alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 52628.

protest 131564-K (New York).

#### Joseph Ullmann Brokerage Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
No. 42892.

#### Protests 984300-G, etc., of Alliance Distributors, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

Following the authorities cited in abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND THE STATEMENT OF INCOME AND THE STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,628,952
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                     32,955
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         177,599
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       363,908
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,203,414
<COMMON>                                     1,065,634
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            120,443
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,186,077
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           684,082
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              50,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   16,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,267,255
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,203,414
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      623,868
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            51,787
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     413,991
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     474,864
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        149,004
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              11,302
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 160,306
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        49,433
<NET-INCOME>                                   110,873
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  110,873
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                             0
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       47,073
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         190,777
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Andrew
Stewart, the President, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer
of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I
L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the
Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.








Date: November 16,
      2009
            /s/ Andrew
      StewartAndrew
      StewartPresident and
      Chief Executive Officer
(Reap. Dec. 8521)

#### United States *v.*D. C. Anduews & Co., Inc.

Entry No. 863928.

(Decided January 20, 1956)

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Eicwall, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned that at the time of exportation of the involved 100 Dairy Milk bars (8,800 outers), no foreign or export value, as defined in Section 402 (c) and (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, existed therefor.

> That the United States value thereof as defined in Section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, was $1.1997 per outer, net.

> That this case is submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the United States value, as that value is defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the 10-cent dairy milk bars here involved, and that such value was $1.1997 per outer, net.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH MILLS, No. CIV S-04-2217-DFL-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s address of record is in French Camp, California. On November

4, 2004, however, an order served on plaintiff at this address was returned by the U.S. Post Office

as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not filed a notice of change of address or otherwise informed the

court and defendants of a new address as required by Eastern District of California Local Rule 83-

183(b). 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-02217-DFL-CMK Document 6 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause in

writing, within 20 days of the date of service of this order, why this action should not be

dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with rules. See Local Rule 11-110. If the

French Camp address is no longer plaintiff’s current address, plaintiff shall also file and serve,

simultaneous with his response to this order to show cause, a notice of change of address. 

DATED: September 21, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02217-DFL-CMK Document 6 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 50052.

#### Protests 67037-K, etc., of Fritzsche Bros., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the-court dismissed the protests.
No. 50071.

#### Protests 90034-K, etc., of Geo. Lueders & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(A. R. D. 3)

#### F. L. Kraemer & Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 800778; 707795.

Second Division, Appellate Term

(Decided July 21, 1952)

*Sharretts, Hillis & Paley (Howard C. Carter*of counsel) for the appellant.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee.

Before La whence, Rao, and Fobd, Judges

Lawrence, Judge:

These applications for review having been formally abandoned are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ELAINE T. ACQUAVIVA,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 383 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of January, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ First Request For An

Extension of Time To Respond To Plai 1 ntiff’s Complaint

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

MONICA N. ANDERSON

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

JODIE A. SCHWAB (SBN 223131)

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 327-1145

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Clayton, Reuter, 

Glensor, Phillips, Gentry, Ayers, Shepherd, 

Kelsch, Grannis, Coombs, and Ramirez

48149286-SA2005300304

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 SACRAMENTO DIVISION

NORMAN TIMOTHY GREGORY,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. AYERS, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CIV S-04-2523 DFL PAN P

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ FIRST REQUEST

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

COMPLAINT

Defendants’ first request for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading to

Plaintiff’s complaint was considered by this Court and, good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, from the date this order is served, Defendants have

30 days, up to and including August 16, 2005, to file their response to Plaintiff’s complaint.

Dated: July 19, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02523-RRB-EFB Document 11 Filed 07/20/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Clarence Montgomery,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1529 LKK PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Tom L. Carey,

Defendant.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner without counsel prosecuting a

civil rights action. 

March 17, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to submit

materials for service of process upon defendant within 30 days. 

He did not. May 11, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to show

cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to

serve process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Plaintiff did not

respond. 

Accordingly, I hereby recommend this action be dismissed

Case 2:04-cv-01529-LKK -PAN Document 5 Filed 07/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

without prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: July 7, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01529-LKK -PAN Document 5 Filed 07/07/05 Page 2 of 2
10872/0005/581524.1 Amended Judgment 

 Case No.: CIV.S-04-2344 LKK JFM

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MICHAEL DAUGHERTY, 

Defendant. 

AND RELATED COUNTERACTIONS 

Case No.: CIV.S-04-2344 LKK JFM

AMENDED JUDGMENT 

DECISION BY THE COURT: This action came on for hearing on a 

summary judgment motion filed by Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Ford Motor 

Credit Company against Defendants and Counterclaimants Michael Daugherty and 

Daugherty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. The issues have been heard and a decision has 

been rendered. The findings of the Court are contained in an Order dated May 1, 

2006, and entered May 2, 2006. Pursuant to that Order, the Court enters Judgment 

as follows: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment 

is entered in favor of Ford Motor Credit Company and against Michael Daugherty 

and Daugherty Lincoln Mercury for the following amounts: 

Principal: $374,711.14 

Interest: $130,506.53 

Total: $505,217.67 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02344-LKK -JFM Document 112 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - 

10872/0005/581524.1 Amended Judgment 

 Case No.: CIV.S-04-2344 LKK JFM

1

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to be determined by noticed motion 

pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54 and Local Rule 78-230. 

The Counterclaims and Third-party Claims filed by Michael Daugherty and 

Daugherty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. against Ford Motor Credit Company and Ford 

Motor Company are denied in their entirety and dismissed with prejudice. Michael 

Daugherty and Daugherty Lincoln Mercury shall take nothing by any of their 

affirmative claims. 

DATE: May 15, 2006 

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON 

Senior Judge 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02344-LKK -JFM Document 112 Filed 05/16/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 66820.

#### J. J. Newberry Co. *v.*United States,

protest 61/12872 (New York).

*471Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of birdcages in chief value of metal, not plated with gold, platinum, or silver, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Heemsoth & Basse*v. *United States*(72 Treas. Dec. 385, T.D. 49191), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES -0XLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Diversified Thermal Solutions,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Julie R. Dean, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

March 27, 2004                              /s/ Julie R. Dean
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Julie R. Dean
                                            Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EnerNOC, Inc. (the “Company”), forthe quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Timothy G. Healy,Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Neal C. Isaacson, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 ofChapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 13,2008

 
| By:    | /s/ Timothy G. Healy    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | Timothy G. Healy        |   |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   |                    |   |
| By:    | /s/ Neal C. Isaacson    |   |
|   | Neal C. Isaacson        |   |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EnerNOC, Inc.and will be retained by EnerNOC, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Rule-Making Cover Sheet ;J_O 10 .- 30? 

TO: Secretary of State 

ATTN: Administrative Procedure Officer 

1. 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

State House Station 101, Augusta, Maine 04333-- "'cccPTCT!!'OI~--­

FlUNG . 

Agency: Department of Environmental Protection JUL 15 2010 

Agency umbrella and unit number: 06-096 L-~~CR€TARV OF STATE 

Title of rule: Control ofVolatile Organic Compounds From Flexible Package Printing 

Chapter number assigned to the rule: 154 

Date(s)/metbod(s) of notice: On March 3, 2010 in the Kennebce Journal, Portland Press Herald, 

Bangor Daily News, Lewiston Sun Jownal and Waterville Morning Sentinel. 

Date(s)/place(s) ofhearing(s): 

hearing 

Type: X new rule 

30-day written comment period, opportunity for public 

_partial amendment(s) of existing rule 

_suspension of existing rule _repeal of rule _ emergency rule 

_repeal and replace: complete replacement of existing chapter, with former version 

simultaneously repealed. 

8. Name/phone of agency contact person: Jeffrey Crawford (207) 287-2437 

9. If a major substantive rule under Title 5, c. 375, sub-CIT-A, check one of the following: 

_Provisional adoption _ Final adoption 

(prior to Legislative review) 

_ Emergency adoption of major-substantive rule 

10. Certification Statement: I, David P. Littell hereby cenify that the attached is a true copy of the rule(s) 

described above and lawfully adopted by The Board of Environmental Protection on June 17. 2010. ,.,.-- . 

1 further certify that all porti.on80f this rule e adopted in compliance with the re · ements of the 

Maine Administrative P edure Act. 

Signature 

(original signature, personally signed by an Assistant Attorney General 

EFFECTIVE OATE~ 'JUL ! O 2010
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ELLEN PAPADAKIS, SBN 186621

THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP

101 2 Street, 18 Floor

nd th

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: (415) 371-1200

Facsimile: (415) 371-1211

Attorneys for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SANFORD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

TONIS OIL INC. DBA SHELL; EQUILON

ENTERPRISE, LLC; and DOES 1 through

10,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV.S. 04-1360 MCE CMK

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON 

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01360-MCE -CMK Document 15 Filed 09/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES:

Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Release between plaintiff, James

Sanford, and defendants, Tonis Oil, Inc. dba Shell and Equilon Enterprises, LLC, the

parties hereby request that all parties be dismissed with prejudice from the aboveentitled action.

Dated: September 8, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

/s/ Scottlynn J. Hubbard, IV

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD, IV 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: September 8, 2005 THELEN REID & PRIEST LLP

Signature On File

ELLEN PAPADAKIS, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendants

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S04-1360 MCE CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: September 14, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01360-MCE -CMK Document 15 Filed 09/14/05 Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0089 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0089

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 March 2007 on the proposal for a Council decision on the Community participation in the capital increase of the European Investment Fund (COM(2006)0621 - C6-0426/2006 - 2006/0203(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 027 E , 31/01/2008 P. 0136 - 0137 *

P6_TA(2007)0089

Community participation in the capital increase of the European Investment Fund *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 March 2007 on the proposal for a Council decision on the Community participation in the capital increase of the European Investment Fund (COM(2006)0621 — C6-0426/2006 — 2006/0203(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2006)0621) [1],

- having regard to Article 3 of Council Decision 94/375/EC of 6 June 1994 on Community membership of the European Investment Fund [2], pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0426/2006),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgets (A6-0065/2007),

1. Approves the Commission proposal;

2. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

3. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] OJ L 173, 7.7.1994, p. 12.

--------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Kimball International,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, James C. Thyen, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

|   | /s/ James C. Thyen                                      |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | JAMES C. THYEN    President,    Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | August 30, 2010                                         |   |