alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY MARSHALL, No. CIV S-04-1841-LKK-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

FAIRFIELD POLICE 

DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On December 12, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. 

Case 2:04-cv-01841-LKK -CMK Document 34 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 12, 2005, are adopted

in full;

2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.

DATED: February 23, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01841-LKK -CMK Document 34 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 51694.

#### Protest 73445-K of Furness Pacific, Ltd. (San Francisco).

*191Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the lifeboats are similar in all material respects to the so-called “boat hull” covered by *Tregoning Boat Co.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 196, C. D. 971). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. RICHARD GEORGE CUNNINGHAM, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 503 WAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 11th day of February, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 23, Form 10-K 

Kansas City Life Insurance Company 

**Consent of Independent Registered PublicAccounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Kansas City Life Insurance Company: 

We consent to the incorporation by referencein the registration statements (No. 333-89984, No. 333-52290, and No. 333-98805) on Form N-4 of Kansas City Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries (the Company) of our report dated February 28, 2011, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010, and allrelated financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, which reports appear in the December 31, 2010 annual report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Life InsuranceCompany and subsidiaries. 

Our report dated February 28, 2011, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that,effective January 1, 2009 the Company changed its method of accounting for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities due to the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification 320. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

KPMG LLP 

Kansas City, Missouri 

February 28, 2011
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 12-1221.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

Proliferation and 

Assistance to Customs Service 

 Implementing Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and MOLDOVA 

Signed at Chisinau December 21, 2012 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
MOLDOVA 

Weapons: Proliferation and 

Assistance to Customs Service 

 Implementing agreement signed at Chisinau 

 December 21, 2012; 

 Entered into force December 21, 2012.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6467

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BASHAWN LEE HANBERRY, a/k/a BO,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CR-94-185, CA-99-13)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bashawn Lee Hanberry, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith,

Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

March 6, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on March 7, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58

and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date

that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Bashawn Lee Hanberry seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Hanberry, Nos. CR-94-185; CA-99-13

(M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 10.2(1)(b)


		
			Exhibit 10.2(1)(b)
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE
A. H. BELO
SAVINGS PLAN
		

		
			A. H. Belo Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), pursuant to its authority to amend the A. H. Belo Savings Plan (the “Plan”) contained in Article 15, Section 15.1 of the Plan, hereby adopts this Second Amendment to the A. H. Belo Savings Plan (the "Plan").
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			1.Appendix A of the Plan is amended to add AHC Proven Performance Media LLC as a participating employer, and Appendix A is replaced in its entirety to read as follows effective as of September 8, 2016:
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			APPENDIX A

EMPLOYERS AS OF July 22, 2016
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			A. H. Belo Corporation
		

		
			A. H. Belo Management Services, Inc.
		

		
			Al Dia, Inc.
		

		
			CDFX, LLC
		

		
			The Dallas Morning News, Inc.
		

		
			Denton Publishing Company
		

		
			Distribion, Inc.
		

		
			Vertical Nerve, Inc.
		

		
			CDFX, LLC
		

		
			AHC Proven Performance Media LLC
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			2.No other provision of the Plan is amended by this Second Amendment to the Plan.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			Executed at Dallas, Texas, this 8th day of September, 2016.
		

		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
		

			
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						A. H. BELO CORPORATION

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						By:

					
					
						/s/

					
					
						Julie Hoagland

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Name:

					
					
						 

					
					
						Julie Hoagland

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						Title:

					
					
						 

					
					
						Senior Vice President/Chief People Officer

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						 

					
					
						 

				
	
					
						﻿

					
					
						 

					
					
						 

				



		
			﻿
		

		
			﻿
-80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

06/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.56 N 76.20 W Meters AGL
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL WINDER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1944 DFL KJM P

vs.

R.W. SANDHAM, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 13, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01944-DFL -KJM Document 28 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 13, 2006, are adopted in full;

and 

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted. 

DATED: 9/27/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01944-DFL -KJM Document 28 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit (13) b.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ENACTED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the annual report on Form 20-F of Komatsu, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenji Kinoshita, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 30, 2008



By:

/S/ KENJI KINOSHITAKenji KinoshitaDirector and Senior Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer




29
Before the First Division,

April 5, 1949

No. 52988.

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 136247-K (Detroit).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the concentrated ox gall the subject of *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
1 **UNITED ST AT**  **ES ENVIRONMENT AL**  **PROTECTION A GENCY** 

WA SHINGTON DC 20460

June 3, 2011 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Supporting Documentation for Camelina Direct Final Rulemaking FROM: Shary

n Lie , Office of Transportation and Air Quality TO: Docket EPA

- HQ
- OAR
- XXX The following documents were used to support the calculations presented in the Camelina Direct Final Rulemaking and associated Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

 “Final Camelina Calculations for Docket.xls” o This document contains information on the assumptions, conversion factors, yi elds, energy

use, GHG emission, an d net returns used in the camelina Direct Final Rule. o N20 emissions included in “N2O” tab are taken from the “N2O Summary ” tab of the “Final Camelina N2O Calculations for Docket.xls” described below. o Camelina fertilizer application rates, energy use, an d yields are taken from the literature search, which are summarized in the “lit review” tab and described in the Federal Register Notice.  “Final Camelina N2O Calculations for D ocket.xls ” o This document contains the direct fertilizer N2O emissions, indire ct fertilizer N2O emissions, direct N2O emissions from crop residue, and indirect N2O emissions from crop residue for camelina and soy bean biodiesel production in the U.S. o The nitrogen fertilizer application rates for camelina are assumed to be 40 pounds /acre, References for these articles are included in the Federal Register notice associated with this docket. o The nitrogen fertilizer application rates for so yb eans are based on regional application rates used in the FASOM model. These application rates are document ed in the Final RFS2 Rulemaking Docket: EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2005
- 0161
- 3178
.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JUNIOR V. ROWE, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 54, 39 CMR 54

No. 21,561

December 6, 1968

*Captain Frank A. Nelson,*JAGC, USN, and *Lieutenant Commander E. M. Fulton, Jr.,*JAGC, USN, were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam :

Before a special court-martial, the accused was represented by two commissioned officers and a warrant officer, none of whom was a qualified lawyer. He pleaded guilty to, and was convicted of, two specifications of unauthorized absence, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886. During sentence proceedings, one of the three counsel made a brief unsworn statement for the accused, in which he recited certain difficulties the accused had with his wife which “prompted him to go UA.” He also made a brief argument in which he maintained that the accused could “be salvaged for the Marine Corps.” The court imposed a sentence extending to confinement at hard labor for six months and a bad-conduct discharge.

According to the convening authority’s action and the post-trial review, at the time of trial the accused had completed more than two years of service. He served in Vietnam and had been awarded the Vietnam Service Medal with two stars; he also was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal.

Considering the nature and circumstance of the offenses to which he pleaded guilty, the accused’s Vietnam service would, in our opinion, have “manifestly and materially affect[ed] the outcome” of the court-martial’s deliberation, on the sentence had it been brought to its attention. United States v Rosenblatt, 13 USCMA 28, 29, 32 CMR 28. It has been suggested that these awards were before the court members because it is customary for an accused to wear all authorized awards on his uniform. However, evidence &s to them was not presented, *55and we cannot say with any assurance that the court members knew they were entitled to consideration in the deliberations on the sentence. On the record, we are constrained to conclude that the failure of counsel to present evidence of the awards, or specifically to call them to the court members’ attention as matters for their consideration, deprived the accused of effective assistance in regard to the sentence. United States v Broy, 14 USCMA 419, 428, 34 CMR 199; United States v Huff, 11 USCMA 397, 29 CMR 213.

The accused has served the period of confinement adjudged by the court-martial and the punitive discharge has been suspended with provision for automatic remission. These circumstances make it inappropriate to continue the proceedings against him. United States v Sheeks, 16 USCMA 430, 37 CMR 50.

The decision of the board of review is reversed. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside, and the charges are ordered dismissed.

Judge Dakden did not participate in the decision in this ease.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nexicon, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

            1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.


            By: /s/ Richard A. Urrea         May 19, 2005
                ----------------------
                Richard A. Urrea
                President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Nexicon, Inc. and will
be retained by Nexicon, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Homeland Security Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
 AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
 ACTION: General Notice.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code of Federal Regulations at section 111.51(a), the following individual Customs broker licenses and any and all permits have been cancelled due to the death of the broker: Name
License #
Port nameErnest W. Fowble
03272
Seattle.Solveij C. Owen
5440
San Francisco.Bernardo Quan Ng
10052
Los Angeles.
 Dated: February 26, 2007. Daniel Baldwin, Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.


[FR Doc. E7-4024 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
No. 60844.

#### S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 274438-K (New York).

*534Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Steven L. Beshear Governor Energy and Environment Cabinet Department for Environmental Protection Division for Air Quality 200 Fair Oaks Lane, 1st Floor Frankfort, Kentucky40601-1403 www.air.ky.gov Leonard K. Peters Secretary

February 4,2010 Mr. StanleyMeiburg Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4 SamNunn Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, SW Atlanta, GA 30303-8960 Dear Mr. Meiburg, The Energy and Environment Cabinet requests that the U.S. EPA approve the following amended air quality regulations to Kentucky's State Implementation Plan (SIP) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 7410(a). These regulations become effective in Kentucky on February 5, 2010, and official copies can be found at http://www.lrc.ky.gov/kar/TITLE401.HTM. The statutory authority for theseregulations is given in KRS 224.10- 1 OO(5). 401 KAR 51:OOl. Defmitionsfor 401 KAR Chapter 51. 401 KAR 51:017. Preventionofsignificant deteriorationof air quality. 401 KAR 51:052. Review of new sources in or impactinguponnonattainment areas. Two copies of the amended administrative regulations are enclosed, and electronic versions havebeen emailed directlyto Dick Schutt and Lynorae Benjamin. The Cabinet appreciates your prompt response to this request. If you have any further questions or concerns about this submittal, please feel free to contact Laura Lund at (502) 564- 3999, ext. 4428, or Laura-Lund@ky.gov. Sincerely,
Henry C. A. List, Deputy Secretary for Leonard K. Peters, Secretary Cc: Dick Schutt Lynorae Benjamin HCAL/11 Enclosures

An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/D
UNBRIDLED SPIRIT
From: Szabo, Aaron To: Fisher, Brian ; Risley, David Subject: Summary of Interagency Comments under EO12866 and 13563: Interstate Transport Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS (RIN 2060-AS05): Non-EGU NOx Emission Control Technical Support Document Date: Monday, November 09, 2015 5:36:03 PM Attachments: Summary of Interagency Comments Under EO12866_13563 EPA CSAPR NPRM_NonEG....docx
Attached please find the summary of interagency comments under EO 12866 and 13563 on the Non-EGU NOx Emission Control Technical Support Document for the draft proposed rule entitled, Interstate Transport Rule for the 2008 Ozone NAAQS

. Thank you and please let me know if you have any comments or questions.

Aaron L. Szabo Policy Analyst Office of Management and Budget 202-395-3621 Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 449 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the assignment of patient 

advocates at medical facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2023 

Ms. STABENOW introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the 

assignment of patient advocates at medical facilities of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Patient Advo5 cacy Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PATIENT ADVOCATES AT MEDICAL FACILITIES OF 

7 DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7309A of title 38, United 

9 States Code, is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 449 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as 

2 subsections (f) and (g), respectively; and 

3 (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the fol4 lowing new subsection (e): 

5 ‘‘(e) NUMBER OF PATIENT ADVOCATES.—Beginning 

6 on the date that is one year after the date of the enact7 ment of the Veterans Patient Advocacy Act, the Director 

8 shall ensure that— 

9 ‘‘(1) there is not fewer than one patient advo10 cate for every 13,500 veterans enrolled in the system 

11 of annual patient enrollment of the Department es12 tablished and operated under section 1705(a) of this 

13 title; and 

14 ‘‘(2) highly rural veterans may access the serv15 ices of patient advocates, including, to the extent 

16 practicable, by assigning patient advocates to rural 

17 community-based outpatient clinics.’’. 

18 (b) GAO REPORT.—Not later than two years after 

19 the date of the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller 

20 General of the United States shall submit to the Com21 mittee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and the Com22 mittee on Veterans’ Affairs of the House of Representa23 tives a report evaluating the implementation by the Sec24 retary of Veterans Affairs of subsection (e) of section 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 449 IS

1 7309A of title 38, United States Code, as added by sub2 section (a)(2). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS