alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4573 

To extend the obligation deadline of funds made available to recipients under 

the American Rescue Plan Act for the purposes of supporting homeless 

children and youth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2024 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. SULLIVAN, and Ms. SINEMA) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To extend the obligation deadline of funds made available 

to recipients under the American Rescue Plan Act for 

the purposes of supporting homeless children and youth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUPPORTING HOMELESS CHILDREN AND 

4 YOUTH. 

5 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, funds 

6 made available to entities under section 2001(b)(1) of 

7 Public Law 117–2 shall remain available to those entities 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4573 IS

1 for purposes authorized under such section through Sep2 tember 30, 2025. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
JOHNNY WELCH

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 2156

___________ __________________/

Opinion filed August 18, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County

. Mark W. Moseley , Judge

.

Johnny Welch , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 19, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, December 19, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0210. ERIC WENDELL YOUNG v. THE STATE .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 180208
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONELL THOLMER,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2491 FCD PAN P

vs.

C. M. HARRISON,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

In view of the findings and recommendations filed November 23, 2005,

recommending dismissal of this action as time-barred, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s April 15, 2005 motion is denied;

2. Petitioner’s May 2, 2005 motion for protective order is denied;

3. Petitioner’s May 4, 2005 motion for protective order is denied;

4. Petitioner’s May 9, 2005 motion is denied;

5. All of petitioner’s requests for evidentiary hearing are denied;

6. Petitioner’s October 4, 2005 motion for protective order is denied; and

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02491-FCD-EFB Document 37 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

7. Petitioner’s October 14, 2005 motion for stay of these proceedings is denied;

DATED: February 27, 2006. 

12

thol2491.o

Case 2:04-cv-02491-FCD-EFB Document 37 Filed 03/01/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STEPHANIE M. ADRAKTAS 

(No. 215323)

Attorney at Law

448 Page St. 

San Francisco, CA 94102

Telephone (415) 699-1507

Fax Number (415) 626-5475

Attorney for Petitioner

LEO ARCHER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEO ARCHER 

Petitioner,

v.

SOLANO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 

Respondent .

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CIV S-04-2249-MCE KJM P

ORDER SETTING DUE DATE

FOR PETITIONER’S

MOTION TO STAY

For the reasons stated in the petitioner’s Notice of Intent to File Motion to Stay

and based on the information presented in petitioner’s Declaration of Counsel, IT IS 

ORDERED that petitioner file a motion to stay the instant proceedings no later than June

22, 2006. 

DATED: May 10, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02249-MCE -KJM Document 24 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIRECTV, INC., a California )

corporation, ) CIV. S-04-2057 GEB DAD

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

ALLEN VIGGERS, ) CONFERENCE

)

Defendant. )

)

Since Plaintiff’s Status Report, which was filed June 2,

2005, indicates that a ruling on the default judgment hearing

plaintiff seeks is now being considered by the Magistrate Judge, the

presently scheduled Status Conference is continued to September 19,

2005. Plaintiff shall file a status report no later than September 6,

2005, in which Plaintiff is only required to explain the status of the

default issue. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 6, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02057-GEB-DAD Document 25 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 1
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- ) ) Mayflower Communications Company, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 63859 )

Under Contract No. W56JSR-20-D-0021 Delivery Order Nos. W56JSR-20-F-0126

W56JSR-21-F-0020 ) ) )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Edmund M. Amorosi, Esq. Haynes and Boone, LLP Tysons Corner, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Dana J. Chase, Esq. Army Chief Trial Attorney CPT Blaine L. Hutchison, JA LTC Nolan Koon, JA

Trial Attorneys

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties have jointly requested that this appeal be dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Unless either party or the

Board acts to reinstate the appeal within one year from the date of this Order, the dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice.

Dated: April 9, 2024

JOHN J. THRASHER Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63859

, Appeal of Mayflower Communications Company, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: April 9, 20 24

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals
Before the Third Division,

September 26, 1950

No. 54688.

#### Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 946462-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the, court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of
the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ LEO F. WELLS, III      
|Leo F. Wells, III          
|Principal Executive Officer
|May 11, 2010               
|                           
|/s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS    
|Douglas P. Williams        
|Principal Financial Officer
|May 11, 2010
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                            | /s/      Jesus R. Adia            |
|---------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                            | Jesus      R. Adia                |
|                            | President      and                |
|                            | Chief      Executive Officer      |
|                            |                              |
|                            |                              |
|                            |                              |
|                            | /s/      John S. Lotardo          |
|                            | John      S. Lotardo              |
|                            | Executive      Vice President and |
|                            | Chief      Financial Officer      |
|                            |                              |
| Date:      August 14,      2008 |                              |
```
**Exhibit 31.01****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14**

         I, Jason McDiarmid, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Essential Innovations Technology
Corp.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 19, 2006

/s/ Jason McDiarmid          
Jason McDiarmid
Principal Executive Officer
```
No. 52044.

#### Oxford University Press, New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 67220-K (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of books of bona fide foreign authorship, composed in chief value of india paper, weighing over 10 pounds and less than 20)£ pounds to the ream of 288,000 square inches, similar in all material respects (except title) to the books which were the subject of *Oxford University Press, New York, Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 63, C. D. 663). In accordance with stipulation and following the cited authority the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

June 30, 1941

No. 46135.

#### Protest 57810-K of Eurasia Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is in chief value of ramie. On the agreed facts the claim at 24 cents per pound under paragraph 1504 (a) and T. D. 48093 was sustained.
No. 47880.

#### Protests 862221-G, etc., of Kwong Yuen Shing et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Oy Wo Tong*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8675)

Entry No. W-04437.

#### New York Merchandise Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided October 10, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above, with the exception of three cases of wooden spoons marked T. 5683/5685 inclusive, at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less the addition made to meet the advances by the Appraiser in similar cases covering non-dutiable F. O. B. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling, and lighterage.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation,

*532On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, except the three cases of wooden spoons marked T. 5683/5685, inclusive, and that such values were the appraised values, less the addition made to meet the advances by the appraiser in similar cases covering nondutiable f. o. b. charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling, and lighterage.

Insofar as the appeal relates to the three cases of wooden spoons marked T. 5683/5685, inclusive, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Before the Second Division,

September 19, 1950

No. 54671.

#### Atlas Imperial Diesel Engine Co. *v.*United States,

protests 135969-K and 135970-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the rough castings of iron the subject of *United States*v. *The Singer Manufacturing Company*(37 C. C. P. A. 104, C. A. D. 427), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# South Coast

Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178 (909) 396-2000 • www.aqmdsov South Coast 

## AQMD

June 27, 2014 Mr. Jared Blumenfeld, Region Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is responsible for submitting National Core (NCore), State and Local Air Monitoring Stations (SLAMS), Photochemical Assessment Monitoring Stations (PAMS), National Air Toxics Trends Stations (NATTS) and air quality data to the Air Quality System (AQS) for those AQS monitors under the control of SCAQMD. In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58, this letter certifies that the following ambient concentration data and the quality assurance data are completely submitted to AQS:

• 2013 FEM PMth

• 2013 FRM 03
• 2013 FRM NO2

• 2013 FRM CO

• 2013 FRM SO2 The above ambient data are accurate to the best of my knowledge, taking into consideration the quality assurance findings. This letter of certification fulfills in part the certification objectives of the Section 105 Grant for Fiscal Year 2014. A separate letter to certify the remaining 2013 ambient concentration data will be submitted soon to complete the certification objectives. The required summary reports for 2013 have been sent electronically to Mr. Fletcher Clover and Dr. Meredith Kurpius at U.S. EPA Region 9.Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at (909) 396-

3249, or Dr. Andrea Polidori, Quality Assurance Manager, Science and Technology Advancement, at (909) 396-3283.

Matt Miyasa h.D. Deputy Executive Officer Science and Technology Advancement

MMM: LT: AP

cc: P. Fine J. Low R. Eden J. Cassmassi M. Leonard
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 1 -

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON 

Ross Cornell, (SBN 210413)

LAW OFFICES OF ROSS CORNELL, APC

813 East Balboa Boulevard

Newport Beach, California 92663

(949) 723-1794

Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. (SBN 208436)

AZIMY & NATHAN, LLP

18500 Von Karman Ave., Suite 500

Irvine, California 92612

Phone: (949) 486-1888

Fax: (949) 486-1889

Attorneys of Record for Plaintiff,

JOSEPH ABDULLAH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH ABDULLAH, 

 

 Plaintiff,

 

 v.

LA RIVIERA COMMONS

APARTMENTS; WOODMAN GROUP;

IRM CORPORATION; LA RIVIERA

COMMONS, LLC; JCM PARTNERS,

LLC and Does 1 through 10, inclusive. 

 

 

 Defendants.

Case No.: CIV.S-04-1731 LKK KJM

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

AND ORDER THEREON

Related Cases:

1. Civ.S-04-2181 LKK KJM

2. Civ.S-04-2215 LKK KJM

3. Civ.S-04-2185 LKK KJM

 F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)

Case 2:04-cv-01731-LKK -KJM Document 21 Filed 05/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND ORDER THEREON 

Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1) Plaintiff Joseph Abdullah and Defendants 

LA RIVIERA COMMONS APARTMENTS; WOODMAN GROUP; IRM

CORPORATION; LA RIVIERA COMMONS, LLC; JCM PARTNERS, LLC

through their attorneys’ undersigned, stipulate and agree that above-captioned

matter may be dismissed as to all claims and all Defendants, without prejudice,

each party to bear his own costs and attorney’s fees.

DATED: April 28, 2005 AZIMY & NATHAN, LLP

By: /s/ Reuben D. Nathan, Esq.

Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. 

Attorney for Plaintiff, JOSEPH ABDULLAH

DATED: April 28, 2005 NOSSAMAN, GUTHNER, KNOX & ELLIOTT, LLP

By: /s/ Carol Rene Brophy, Esq. as authorized on April 28, 2005

Carol Rene’Brophy, Esq.

Attorney for Defendants,

LA RIVIERA COMMONS

APARTMENTS; WOODMAN

GROUP; IRM CORPORATION; LA

RIVIERA COMMONS, LLC; JCM

PARTNERS, LLC

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that the abovecaptioned matter is dismissed as to all claims and all Defendants, without

prejudice, each party to bear his own costs and attorney’s fees. 

Dated: April 29, 2005. /s/Lawrence K. Karlton

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01731-LKK -KJM Document 21 Filed 05/02/05 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 19, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40584

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NICOLAS PENA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-149-2

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nicolas Pena appeals the 96-month sentence imposed following

his guilty plea conviction for importing cocaine. He argues that

the district court erred by not finding that he played a minor

role in the offense and sentencing him accordingly. As Pena

concedes, this claim is reviewed for plain error only due to his

failure to raise it in the district court. See United States v.

Villegas, 404 F.3d 355, 358 (5th Cir. 2005).

Pena has failed to establish that he was less culpable than

other participants in the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2,
No. 06-40584

-2-

comment. (n.5). He has not shown that the district court plainly

erred in connection with his sentence. The judgment of the

district court is AFFIRMED.