alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10090)

#### Automatic Vulcanizers Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 733758, etc.

(Decided October 30, 1961)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*William S. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon stipulation reading as follows:

> 1. The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise described in said schedule, with or without qualifying Words and with or without symbols, and on the relevant dates of exportation such or similar merchandise was being freely offered for sale pursuant to Section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, or Section 402(e) of the said Act as it existed prior to the said amendment, as indicated in the attached schedule.

> 2. On the relevant dates of exportation there was no higher export value for such or similar merchandise, as such value is • defined1 in Section 402a (d) of said Act.

> That the above appeals may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation; and that each of the appeals as to alii other merchandisé not above referred to is hereby abandoned.

On the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as it existed prior to the effective date of the amendment thereof by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, or section 402a (c) of the said act, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, depending upon the date of entry or withdrawal from warehouse for consumption, is the proper basis of value of the merchandise described in the attached schedule, and that such value in each case is as shown in the column in said schedule headed “Value.”

In all other respects and as to all other merchandise, the appeals *490for reappraisement, having been abandoned, are, to that extent, dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

*491

*492

*493

*494
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER JAMES,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1574 FCD PAN P

vs.

J. SOLIS, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 31, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01574-FCD-KJN Document 12 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 31, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. Respondent’s October 15, 2004, motion to dismiss is granted and petitioner’s

November 3, 2004, motion to stay this action while he returns to state court with his unexhausted

claim is denied and his November 3, 2004, motion to delete his third claim is granted so this

action proceeds on only the exhausted claims.

DATED:September 21, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01574-FCD-KJN Document 12 Filed 09/21/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 229 (Friday, November 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70913-70914]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28045]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8957]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Islamic Galleries''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Islamic Galleries,'' imported from abroad 
for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Art Institute of Chicago, 
Chicago, Illinois, from on or about December 18, 2014, until on or 
about November 17, 2017, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

[[Page 70914]]

    Dated: November 18, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-28045 Filed 11-26-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v LEONARD C. LaFIRST, Seaman, U. S. Navy, Appellant

18 USCMA 66, 39 CMR 66

No. 21,306

December 13, 1968

*67
      *Lieutenant Robert F. Baldwin,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Commander Walter F. Brown,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Although the documentation as to the circmstances surrounding the composition and organization of the special court-martial that tried this accused is not as complete as that in United States v McLaughlin, 18 USCMA 61, 39 CMR 61, there is sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the convening authority exercised the same sort of control over this court as he did over the court-martial in *McLaughlin.*For the reasons set out in our opinion in that case, we reverse the decision of the board of review here. The findings of guilty and the sentence are set aside, and the Charge is ordered dismissed.

Judge Darden did not participate in the decision in this case.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SCHEER & IMFELD, LLP

SPENCER P. SCHEER # 107750

MICHAEL D. IMFELD # 76851

100 Smith Ranch Rd., Suite 306

San Rafael, CA 94903

Telephone: (415) 491-8900

Facsimile: (415) 491-8910

Attorneys for Plaintiff FRED GRANGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FREDERICK GRANGE,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MODERN GROUP, LTD., et al., 

Defendants.

__________________________________/

Case No. 04-CV-1815 WBS/JM

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

HEARING DATE: Hearing Date

TIME:

JUDGE: Hon. William B. Schubb

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the stipulation of the parties in this case, through

their attorneys, Michael D. Imfeld and Scheer & Imfeld, LLP, for Plaintiff and Eric B. Simon and

Dillingham & Murphy, LLP, for Defendants, that this case is dismissed in its entirety with

prejudice. 

Dated: December 22, 2005

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Case 2:04-cv-01815-WBS -JFM Document 87 Filed 12/22/05 Page 1 of 1
---

---

Exhibit 4.(a).60.4



The State of Israel
Ministry of Communications

|General
License of Partner Fixed Communications Solutions Limited Partnership for the
Provision of Domestic Fixed-Line Telecommunication Services
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# Amendment No. 4

|By
virtue of the powers of the Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the
Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have been
delegated to us, by all our other powers under any law and after having considered the
request of Partner Fixed Communications Solutions Limited Partnership for the Provision of
Domestic Fixed-Line Telecommunication Services, (Partner), we hereby amend the
General License for the provision of Domestic Fixed-Line Telecommunication Services,
granted toPartneron 15 January 2007, as follows:
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# Amendment to Appendix B

| | 1. | In
Appendix B, in article 2-List of Services:
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------

| | a. | After
item no. 4 shall come:
| | -- | ----------------------------



|4a | Digital  Transmission | Provision of transmission services in a digital interface and at different intervals | Immediate | 
|-- | --------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | --------- | 



| | b. | In
item no. 33, in the column of Start Time, shall come April
                    2007 and in the Comments column, at the end shall come in
accordance                     with the service file.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | c. | After
item no. 44 shall come:
| | -- | -----------------------------



|45 | "Dark Fibers" | Connection by "Dark Fibers" between sites | Immediate | 
|-- | ------------- | ----------------------------------------- | --------- | 



(11 July, 2007)

| |                                        |                                    
| | -------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------
|
|
|
|
| | (sgd)                                  | (sgd)                              
| | ___________________Mordechai Mordechai | ___________________Haim Giron, Adv.
| | Director-General                       | Senior Deputy Director-General,    
| |                                        | Engineering and Licensing          



---

---
No. 52306.

protests 946650-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
BRUCE W. NICKERSON, C.B.N. 90760 

231 Manor Drive 

San Carlos, CA 94070 

Tel: (650) 594-0195 

ERIC H. SCHWEITZER 

2150 Tulare Street 

Fresno, CA 93721 

(559) 266-9800 

Attorneys for the Plaintiff Class 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISCTRICT COURT FOR 

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ROBERT T. BROWN, individually and on 

Behalf of a Class of Persons similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

Vs. 

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, SHERIFF 

BAXTER DUNN, DEPUTY RICHARD 

DUNSING, DEPUTY SEMILLO, DEPUTY 

MENDEZ, LT. MENDOZA, and DOES I through 

X, inclusive) 

Defendants. 

) 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) 

)

NO: CIV S 04-2008 FCD/PAN 

Stipulation and Order for 

Continuance 

“AS MODIFIED” 

RECITALS 

1. The pre-trial conference is currently set for March 31, 2006. On March 29, 2006 there will be a 

total eclipse of the sun visible in Turkey. Plaintiff’s counsel, Bruce W. Nickerson has been 

planning on seeing this eclipse for several years, and has airline and hotel reservations for that 

day. It would be extremely difficult if not impossible for him to return March 31 for the pre-trial 

conference. 

Case 2:04-cv-02008-FCD-EFB Document 13 Filed 07/18/05 Page 1 of 2
NOW THEREFORE the parties stipulate as follows: 

The date of the pretrial conference shall be continued one week to April 7, 2006. 

Dated: July 18, 2005 /s-Bruce W. Nickerson

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: July 18, 2005 /s-Daniel C. Cederborg

Attorney for Defendants 

ORDER 

GOOD CAUSE HAVING BEEN SHOWN, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 

that the pretrial conference be continued to April 21, 2006, at 2:30pm. 

Dated: July 18, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

 Honorable Frank C. Damrell 

 U.S. District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-02008-FCD-EFB Document 13 Filed 07/18/05 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1800-1801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-408]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending January 5, 2007

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: OST-1996-2016.
    Date Filed: January 3, 2007.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: January 24, 2007.
    Description: Application of Continental Airlines, Inc., requesting 
renewal of its Route 739 certificate to provide scheduled air 
transportation of persons, property, and mail between Newark and the 
coterminal points Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

    Docket Number: OST-2007-26807.
    Date Filed: January 3, 2007.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: January 24, 2007.
    Description: Application of Inter Island Airways, Inc., requesting 
a certificate of public convenience and necessity authorizing 
interstate and foreign scheduled air transportation of persons, 
property, and mail in the following geographic areas: Tutuila Island, 
American Samoa; Ofu Island and Tau Island of the Manu' a Group in

[[Page 1801]]

American Samoa; and Maota and Faleolo, Independent State of Samoa.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
 [FR Doc. E7-408 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 9, 2018

No. 04-18-00633-CV

CITY OF RIO GRANDE, TEXAS, et al.,

Appellants

v.

BFI WASTE SERVICES OF TEXAS, LP d/b/a Allied Waste Services of Rio Grande Valley,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-15-604

Honorable Migdalia Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellants’ unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby 

GRANTED IN PART. Time is extended to October 29, 2018.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4160 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4160

   To limit the closure or consolidation of any United States Postal 
  Service processing and distribution center in States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2024

 Ms. Lummis (for herself, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Barrasso, and Mrs. Shaheen) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To limit the closure or consolidation of any United States Postal 
  Service processing and distribution center in States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Postal Operations Stay Timely and 
Local Act'' or the ``POSTAL Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CLOSING OR CONSOLIDATING POSTAL SERVICE 
              PROCESSING AND DISTRIBUTION CENTERS IN STATES.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Processing and distribution center.--The term 
        ``processing and distribution center'' means a central mail 
        facility that--
                    (A) distributes and dispatches part or all of both 
                incoming mail and outgoing mail for a designated 
                service area;
                    (B) provides instructions on the preparation of 
                collection mail, dispatch schedules, and sorting plan 
                requirements to mailers; and
                    (C) is a sectional center facility, a general mail 
                facility, or a dedicated mail processing facility 
                without a station or branch.
            (2) State.--The term ``State'' means a State or the 
        District of Columbia.
    (b) Limitation.--The United States Postal Service may not close, 
consolidate, downgrade, or take any other similar action with respect 
to a processing and distribution center in a State if such action would 
result in there being no processing and distribution center located in 
that State or would negatively impact mail delivery.
                                 <all>
```
No. 60058.

#### Oliver Straw Goods Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 283920-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit
      32.1**


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-KSB for the period  ended
      December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350
      of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the SecuritiesExchange
                Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  1350
      and
      is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing
      of
      the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any
      general incorporation language in such filing.





Date:
                April 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Liu
                BoLiu
                Bo
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (principal
                executive officer)