T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T EB RAHI M KA LATE HE, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 11- 71752 A ge nc yN o. A 078- 908- 098 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay14, 2013 ** B efo re: L E A V Y , T H O M A S , an dM U R G U IA , C i rcu i tJu d g es. E br ahi m K a l a t e he , ana t i ve and c i t i z e n of I r an, pe t i t i ons f

orr e vi e w of

the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order denyi ng hi s m ot i on t o reopen re m ov alproceedi ng s. O ur j uri sdi ct i on i s gov erned b y 8 U . S . C . § 1 25 2. W e r evi ew f o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n . N

aj m ab ad iv. H

older , 597 

# FI LED MA Y20 2 013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 71752 2 F . 3d 98 3, 98 6 (9th C i r. 20 10 ). W e deny i n p art , di sm i ss i n p art , and g ranti n p art the pe t i t i on f

orr e vi e w , and w e r e m and. T he B IA di d n otabuse i t s di sc re t i on i n d enyi ng K al at ehe’ s m ot i on as un t i m el y bec ause the m ot i on w as fi l ed ov erfour ye ar s a ft erthe agency’ s f i nal o r d e r , se e 8 C . F . R . § 1 00 3. 2(c) (2), and the B IA consi dere d the re cord and act ed w ith in its b r o a dd is c r e tio n in d e te rm in in g th a t th e e v id e n c e w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to e s t abl i s h pr i m af

a c i e e l i gi bi l i tyf

orde f e rr a l of r e m ova l unde rthe C onve nt i on A g a in s t T o rtu r e . See Mendez- G ut i errez v . G on zales , 44 4 F . 3d 11 68 , 11 72 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 6 ) ( “v a g u e an dc o n c lu s o rya lle g a tio n s ” in s u f f ic ie n t to e s tab lis h p r im af a c ie e l i gi bi l i ty ) . W e r e

j e c tK a l a t e he ’ s c ont e nt i ons tha tthe B I A f a i l e d t o c ons i de ror i nadequ at el y c on si dere d evi dence, and thatthe B IA appl i ed the w rong l egal s t andar d. W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o r e vi e w K a l a t e he ’ s c ha l l e nge t o hi s unde r l y i ng in a b s e n tia re m ov alorder, because thi s pet i t i on for r evi ew i s unt i m el y a s t o that o r d e r . See 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 ( b ) ( 1 ) ; Mem breno v. G on zales , 425 F . 3d 1227, 1229 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 5 ) . C o n tr aryto K a la te h e ’s a s s e rtio n , th e B I A d idn o t e le c t to r e v is it the i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on. In assessi n g K al at eh e’ s m o t i o n t o reo p en , h o w ev er, th e B IA d i dn o tad d ress K a la te h e ’s a s y lu m an dw ith h o ld in g o f r e m o v a l c la im s . See B rezi l i en v. H older ,11- 71752 3 5 6 9 F . 3 d4 0 3 , 4 1 2 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 9 ) (B IA i s n o tfree t o i g n o re arg u m en t s rai sedb y a pe t i t i one r ) . A c c or di ngl y , w e gr antthe pe t i t i on a s t o K a l a t e he ’ s a s y l um and w ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im s an dr e m an df o rth e a g e n c yto c o n s id e rh is m o tio n to r e o p e n a s to th e s e c la im s . See IN S v. V en tu ra , 53 7 U . S . 12 , 16 -18 (20 02 ) ( per c u r ia m ) . E a c h p artys h a l l b e ari t s o wn c o s t s f o rth i s p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. P E T IT IO N F O R R E V IE W D E N IE D i n p art; D IS M IS S E D i n p art; GR AN T E D i n p a r t ; RE MAND E D.