alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Contract Schedule










	
Owner:

	
[John Doe]

	
Contract Number:

	
[??687456]


	
[Joint Owner:

	
[Jane Doe]]

	
Issue Date:

	
[04/15/10]


	
Annuitant:

	
[John Doe]

	
Scheduled Annuity Date:

	
[04/01/65]


	
Determining Life (Lives):

	
[John Doe]

	
Maximum Issue Age:

	
[80]


	 	
[Jane Doe]

	 	 








	
Purchase Payments

	 
	
Initial Purchase Payment:

	
$[10,000.00]


	
Minimum Additional Purchase Payment:

	
$[50.00]


	
Maximum Total Purchase Payments:

	
$[1 million]


	 	 
	
Transfers

	 
	
Number of Free Transfers Permitted:

	
[12] each Contract Year


	
Transfer Fee:

	
$25.00 for each transfer in excess of the free transfers permitted


	
Transfer Index Anniversary:

	
Every [Sixth] Index Anniversary


	 	 
	
Contract Charges

	 
	
Product Fee:

	
[0.25]%


	
Contract Maintenance Charge:

	
$[50.00] each Contract Year


	
Designated Amount:

	
Contract Value must be $[100,000.00] to waive the Contract Maintenance Charge


	 	 
	
Withdrawals

	 
	
Minimum Partial Withdrawal:

	
$[100.00]


	
Minimum Required Value:

	
$[2,000.00]


	
Free Withdrawal Amount:

	
[10]% of total Purchase Payments










Withdrawal Charge Percentages Table







	 	
Number of Complete Years Since Receipt of Purchase Payment

	
Charge


	
0

	
6.50%


	
1

	
6.00%


	
2

	
5.00%


	
3

	
4.00%


	
4

	
2.00%


	
5

	
1.00%


	
6 years or more

	
0%










	
Annuity Payments

	 
	
Minimum Annuity Payment:

	
$[100.00]


	
Annuity Mortality Table:

	
[Annuity 2000 Mortality Table]


	
Minimum Annual Annuity Payment Rate:

	
[1.00]%


	
Allowed Payees:

	
[Financial institution, qualified plan, court-ordered individual]












S40875-ADV-NY [3A]















Guaranteed Purchase Rate Table


Upon request, we will furnish rates for ages and guaranteed periods not shown.







	
Annuity Options - Guaranteed monthly annuity payments per $1,000


 


	 	
Option 1

	
Option 2

	
Option 3

	
Option 4

	
Option 5


	 	
Life Annuity

	
Life with 10-year guaranteed period

	
Life with 20-year guaranteed period

	
100% joint and survivor

	
100% joint and survivor with10-year guaranteed period

	
Refund Life Annuity


	
Age on


Annuity Date

	
Male

	
Female

	
Male

	
Female

	
Male

	
Female

	
Male & Female


Same Age

	
Male & Female


Same Age

	
Male

	
Female


	
30

	
[2.08

	
1.97

	
2.08

	
1.97

	
2.07

	
1.97

	
1.84

	
1.84

	
2.00

	
1.92


	
40

	
2.45

	
2.29

	
2.45

	
2.29

	
2.42

	
2.28

	
2.10

	
2.10

	
2.29

	
2.19


	
50

	
3.02

	
2.78

	
3.00

	
2.77

	
2.92

	
2.73

	
2.49

	
2.49

	
2.70

	
2.57


	
60

	
3.95

	
3.57

	
3.87

	
3.53

	
3.59

	
3.37

	
3.12

	
3.11

	
3.29

	
3.14


	
70

	
5.66

	
5.03

	
5.28

	
4.83

	
4.24

	
4.13

	
4.22

	
4.20

	
4.18

	
4.00


	
80

	
8.93

	
8.09

	
7.07

	
6.79

	
4.55

	
4.53

	
6.37

	
6.04

	
5.54

	
5.38


	
90

	
15.24

	
14.64

	
8.36

	
8.30

	
4.59

	
4.59

	
10.68

	
7.98

	
7.66

	
7.50]











S40875-ADV-NY [3A]
#### State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. Timothy L. Davis, *Appellant.*

No. 48,290

Opinion filed December 11, 1976.

*Brett H. Robinson,*Assistant Public Defender, of Topeka, argued the cause, and *William*G. *Thomton,*Legal Intern to the Public Defender, of Topeka, was with him on the brief for the appellant.

*Gene M. Olander,*District Attorney, argued the cause, and *Curt T. Schneider,*Attorney General, was with him on the brief for the appellee.

*Harry F. Swanger, Esq.,*and *Stella Schoen,*National Juvenile Law Center, Saint Louis University School of Law, St. Louis, Missouri, were on the brief amicus curiae.

Fatzer, C. J.

Affirmed.
No. 66840.

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/23880, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decharacterized horsemeat, fresh, chilled, or frozen, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 66254, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Respondent, No. CR-S-02-0491 WBS KJM P

vs.

DEE LAIL,

Movant. ORDER

 /

Movant is a federal prisoner proceeding with a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 13, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01863-WBS -KJM Document 1 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 13, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s July 12, 2005 motion to dismiss is granted;

3. This case is closed; and

4. The clerk of the court is directed to close the companion civil case

No. CIV S-04-1863 WBS KJM P.

DATED: February 17, 2006

/lail0491.801

Case 2:04-cv-01863-WBS -KJM Document 1 Filed 02/22/06 Page 2 of 2
PUBLIC LAW 112–255—JAN. 10, 2013 126 STAT. 2411 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6379: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Dec. 19, 20, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 27, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–255 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6239 Savannah 

Highway in Ravenel, South Carolina, as the ‘‘Representative Curtis B. Inabinett, 

Sr. Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. REPRESENTATIVE CURTIS B. INABINETT, SR. POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 6239 Savannah Highway in Ravenel, South Carolina, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Representative Curtis 

B. Inabinett, Sr. Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Representative Curtis B. Inabinett, Sr. Post Office’’. 

Approved January 10, 2013. 

Jan. 10, 2013 

[H.R. 6379] 


ccoleman on DSK8P6SHH1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
**Exhibit
      32.2**








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of m-Wise, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gabriel Kabazo, Chief
      Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Gabriel
      Kabazo


Gabriel
      Kabazo, Chief Financial Officer





Dated:
      November 14, 2008
No. 44011.

#### Protests 682412-G, etc., of Akawo & Co., Ltd., et al. (Baltimore and Norfolk).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
No. 50457.

#### Protests 54452-K, etc., of Eugene Dietzgen Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case No. 6,756.

#### HOWARD v. COBB.

[The case reported under above title in 13 Leg. Int. 301, 19 Law Rep. 377, and 36 Hunt, Mer. Mag. 707, is the same as Case No. 2,924.}
No. 57714.

#### Barnett International Forwarders, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 207519-K (New York).

Rao, Judge:

An importation from France, consisting of three cases of printed matter, was classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as pamphlets of *bona fide*foreign authorship, and assessed with duty at the rate of 5 per centum ad valorem, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1410 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T. D. 51802.

It is claimed in the protest filed against said assessment that the merchandise in question is entitled to entry free of duty, within the provisions of paragraph 1629 of said act, as material “printed at the instruction and expense of the French Government.”

When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance in behalf of the plaintiff. Accordingly, and pursuant to rule 5 of the Rules of the United States Customs Court, the ease was ordered submitted.

An examination of the official papers herein reveals no facts which would warrant overruling the presumptively correct action taken by the collector, despite the presence among said papers of a document entitled “Memorandum Re Protest No. 15455, 1952” which contains the following statement:

> As to item L’Economie *only,*although claim thereunder was not made in protest, this office is satisfied to stipulate this item free of duty under Par. 1630 as publications in a language other than English. [Italics quoted.]

Inasmuch as the said memorandum is dated May 25, 1953, and does not otherwise appear to have been completed within 90 days from November 19, 1952, the date of the filing of the protest, the collector was without jurisdiction to make the said recommendation. See section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

Moreover, the claim in the protest is confined to the allegation that the merchandise is entitled to free entry by virtue of the provisions of paragraph 1629 of said act. There is no claim asserting the applicability of paragraph 1630 thereof, or that the item L’Economie is entitled to entry free of duty as a publication printed wholly or in a language other than English.

Neither is there a provision in said paragraph 1629 for material printed at the instruction and expense of a foreign Government.

For the foregoing reasons, the claim in the protest is overruled. Judgment will be entered accordingly.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6561

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DANA DEMONE BRINSON, a/k/a Rock,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief

District Judge. (CR-93-11-V, CA-95-187-V)

Submitted: October 23, 1997 Decided: November 14, 1997

Before HAMILTON and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dana Demone Brinson, Appellant Pro Se. Jerry Wayne Miller, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Brinson, Nos. CR-93-11-V; CA-95-187-V

(W.D.N.C. Mar. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In  connection  with the  quarterly  report of  Strategy  International
Insurance  Group,  Inc (the  "Company")  on Form  10-QSB for the  period  ending
October  31,  2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on
December __, 2004 (the "Report"),  I, Stephen Stonhill,  Chief Executive Officer
of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                /s/ Stephen Stonhill
                -----------------------
                Stephen Stonhill
                Chief Executive Officer
                December 20, 2004

A signed  original of this  certification  has been  provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                                      -10-
Order filed January 6, 2015. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00431-CV

____________

JASMINE RICKS, Appellant

V.

QUALITY CARRIERS, INC. & CRAIG L. SMITH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-17716

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due December 17, 2014. No brief or motion for 

extension of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before February 5, 2015, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer


of
Rainier Pacific Financial Group, Inc.


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The undersigned hereby certifies,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2009, that:





1.
            the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations as
      of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
      included in such report.

















/s/John A. Hall


John
A. Hall


President
and Chief Executive Officer,


Interim
Chief Financial Officer








Dated:
November 9, 2009




44
No. 46134.

#### Protests 960902-G, etc., of Cambosco Scientific Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 51718.

#### Protests 116104-K, etc., of Imported Liquors Co. et al. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of certain cases was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the ■loss appearing upon the inspectors’ returns as verified by the affidavits of the importers. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 64138.

protest 59/17835 (Los Angeles).

#### The American Import Co. *v.*United States,

*452Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the the merchandise consists of glass ornamental novelties similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62984, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 48475.

#### Protests 93571-K, etc., of Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
---

---

# Exhibit 14.(a).1



| |                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Kesselman & KesselmanCertified Public Accountants
Trade Tower, 25 Hamered Street
Tel Aviv 68125 Israel
P.O Box 452 Tel Aviv 61003
Telephone +972-3-7954555
Facsimile +972-3-7954556

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-14222) of
Partner Communications Company Ltd., of our report dated June 6, 2007, relating to the
financial statements, which appears in this Form 20-F.

|Tel-Aviv, Israel |  | /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman
Kesselman & Kesselman Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
|---------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 6, 2007



---

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, Bar #89424

Acting Federal Defender

DAVID M. PORTER, Bar #127024

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-5700

Attorney for Petitioner

ROBERT RAMESES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT RAMESES,

Petitioner,

v.

SCOTT KERNAN, Warden,

Respondent.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. Civ. S-04-1173 GEB GGH P

UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO EXTEND

DEADLINE FOR FILING TRAVERSE;

ORDER

Judge: Hon. Gregory G. Hollows

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-142, Petitioner, ROBERT RAMESES, by and

through his counsel, Assistant Federal Defender David M. Porter, 

hereby requests an extension of 30 days in which to file the traverse, 

which is currently due on March 29, 2006. 

This extension is the second extension requested, one earlier

extension of thirty days having been granted, and it is being sought

because of the undersigned’s duties in other cases, including filing

one opening and three appellate reply briefs, a Ninth Circuit oral

argument, and a supplemental brief.

This extension is not interposed to unduly delay the proceedings,

to gain unfair advantage, or for any other improper purpose. The

undersigned has contacted respondent's counsel, Deputy Attorney General

Case 2:04-cv-01173-GEB -GGH Document 44 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Mathew K. Chan, who graciously indicated that he has no opposition to

the requested extension. Mr. Rameses has been notified and personally

joins in this request. Accordingly, petitioner requests this Court

enter the order lodged with this request.

Dated: March 28, 2006

Respectfully submitted,

DANIEL J. BRODERICK

Acting Federal Defender

 /s/ David M. Porter 

DAVID M. PORTER

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Petitioner

ROBERT RAMESES

O R D E R

Pursuant to the request of petitioner, and good cause appearing

therefor, it is hereby ORDERED that the traverse may be filed on or

before April 28, 2006.

DATED: 4/10/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

___________________________

HONORABLE GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States Magistrate Judge

rame1173.po2

Case 2:04-cv-01173-GEB -GGH Document 44 Filed 04/10/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 6742.

#### STATE OF LOUISIANA vs. B. C. BROWN.

Syllabus.

A maker and vendor of ice eream is not a manufacturer “in any sense of the term.” *City vs. Mannessier,*32 *An.,*1075.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Divisions “A” and “B,” No. 116,028. Honorables T. C. W. Ellis and F. D. King, Judges.

James R. Parkerson, for plaintiff and appellee.

Stafford & Robinson, for defendant and appellant.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

The State claims a license' tax which defendant resists on the ground that he is a manufacturer.

His product is ice cream; and it is shown by the evi- ' dence that his- plant is of the most modern and sanitary construction.

*473Opinion and decree, June 12th, 1916.

Rehearing refused, June 20th, 1916.

It is a large establishment, requiring a large investment of capital, operated by powerful machinery, giving employment to a large number of persons, doing an extensive business reaching even beyond the limits of the State; an establishment which may justly be termed a credit to the commerce of the city and' the enterprise of defendant.

But the fact remains that his product is ice cream (a delicacy too well known to need any particular description).

And the Supreme Court of the State, under a state of facts not essentially different from those at bar, has decided point blank that such an establishment was not a manufactory “in any sense of the word.”

City vs. Mannessier, 32 An., 1075.

We feel no more at liberty to disregard this opinion than did the District Judge, and must therefore affirm his judgment.

Judgment affirmed.
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 23, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Jing Wang                  |   |
|--------------------|--------|-------------------------------------|--------|
|               |   | Jing Wang                           |   |
|               |   | Chief Executive Officer             |   |
|               |   |  (Principal Executive Officer) |   |

----
No. 63105.

#### M. Pressner *&*Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/14784, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell water flowers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 61346, except that the merchandise herein is in chief value of shell, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.