alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10737)

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 10048-H, etc.

(Decided April 28, 1964)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiff:.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge.

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by counsel for the parties hereto:

> That the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement set forth in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of wire strand exported from Japan during-the period beginning January 31, 1962 and ending March 21, 1962; that wire strand is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that on or immediately preceding the date of exportation of each shipment of wire strand covered by each of the appeals to reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A, the prices at which wire strand, such as or similar to the wire strand described on the invoices covered by the instant appeals to reappraisement were freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal market of Japan in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $245. per metric ton for wire strand of % *538inch diameter and $241. per metric ton for wire strand of %6 inch, and % inch diameter (United States funds).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals to reap-praisement enumerated in Schedule A are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and the entry file covered by each appeal.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value therefor is $245 per metric ton for wire strand of %-inch diameter and $241 per metric ton for wire strand of %6-inch and %-inch diameter (United States funds).

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3996 

To enhance the work of the North Pacific Research Board. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2024 

Mr. SULLIVAN (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To enhance the work of the North Pacific Research Board. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North Pacific Research 

5 Board Enhancement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NORTH PACIFIC RESEARCH BOARD ENHANCEMENT. 

7 Section 401(e) of Public Law 105–83 (111 Stat. 

8 1608; 43 U.S.C. 1474d) is amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (3)— 

10 (A) in subparagraph (L), by striking 

11 ‘‘and’’ after the semicolon; 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3996 IS

1 (B) in subparagraph (M), by striking the 

2 period at the end and inserting a semicolon; 

3 (C) in subparagraph (N), by striking the 

4 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; 

5 (D) by inserting after subparagraph (N) 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(O) one member who shall represent Alaska 

8 Natives and possesses personal knowledge of, and di9 rect experience with, subsistence uses and shall be 

10 nominated by the Board and appointed by the Sec11 retary.’’; and 

12 (E) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘Board members appointed under subpara14 graphs (N) and (O) shall serve for 3-year 

15 terms, and may be reappointed once.’’; and 

16 (2) in paragraph (4)(B), by striking ‘‘Not more 

17 than 15 percent of the funds provided to the Sec18 retary of Commerce under paragraph (1) may be 

19 used to provide support for the Board and admin20 ister grants under this subsection.’’ and inserting 

21 ‘‘The funds provided to the Secretary of Commerce 

22 under paragraph (1) may be used to provide support 

23 for the Board and administer grants under this sub24 section. The Board shall maximize the percentage of 

25 funds directed to research and maintain the highest 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3996 IS

1 quality standards in administering grants under this 

2 subsection. On the date that is 5 years after the 

3 date of enactment of the North Pacific Research 

4 Board Enhancement Act, not more than 15 percent 

5 of the funds provided to the Secretary of Commerce 

6 under paragraph (1) may be used to provide support 

7 for the Board and administer grants under this sub8 section.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          21,408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,226
<ALLOWANCES>                                       605
<INVENTORY>                                     20,144
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,614
<PP&E>                                          39,809
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,590
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 112,338
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,835
<BONDS>                                          3,225
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           199
<OTHER-SE>                                      75,574
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   112,338
<SALES>                                        150,561
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,561
<CGS>                                           58,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,625
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (445)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,471
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,426
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,045
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,045
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.30


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #12-2003 Limited
Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      13, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH DEAN DAWSON, No. 2:04-cv-1746-MCE-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

TEMPLE, et al.,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a

Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. On December 10, 2004, Judgment was entered in this Court

denying the petition. On January 21, 2005, Petitioner filed a

Notice of Appeal. Before Petitioner can appeal this decision, a

Certificate of Appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c);

Fed. R .App. P. 22(b). Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b)

requires the district court judge who rendered a judgment denying

such petition to “either issue a certificate of probable cause or

state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue.”

Case 2:04-cv-01746-MCE -CMK Document 27 Filed 04/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional

requirement. Scott v. Younger, 739 F.2d 1464, 1466 (9th Cir.

1984). Here, the time limit for filing a notice of appeal

following entry of judgment is thirty days. See Fed. R. App. P.

4(a). Petitioner's Notice of Appeal in this action was filed

more than thirty (30) days after entry of Judgment. 

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has

held that the issuance of a certificate of probable cause cannot

vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction if jurisdiction is

not proper in that court. Hayward v. Britt, 572 F.2d 1324, 1325

(9th Cir. 1978). The rationale of Hayward applies with equal

force to a certificate of appealability. For these reasons, the

Court declines to issue a Certificate of Appealability.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATE: April 20, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01746-MCE -CMK Document 27 Filed 04/21/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT (21)

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant


Name:                              Kleinert's, Inc. of Alabama

State of Incorporation:            Alabama

Trading as:                        Kleinert's, Inc. of Alabama


Name:                              Kleinert's, Inc. of Delaware

State of Incorporation:            Delaware

Trading as:                        Kleinert's, Inc. of Delaware


Name:                              Kleinert's, Inc. of New York

State of Incorporation:            New York

Trading as:                        Kleinert's, Inc. of New York


Name:                              Kleinert's, Inc. of Florida

State of Incorporation:            Florida

Trading as:                        Kleinert's, Inc. of Florida


Name:                              Certified Apparel Services of Honduras, S.A.

State of Incorporation:            Honduras, CA.

Trading as:                        Certified Apparel Services of Honduras, S.A.

<PAGE>
No. 51007.

#### Protests 117310-K, etc., of T. Sumida & Co., Ltd., et al. (Honolulu, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit (13) a.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ENACTED BY



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Komatsu, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 3, 2004 as amended by
this Form 20-F/A dated the date hereof (the Report), I, Masahiro Sakane, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 4, 2004



By:

/s/ Masahiro SakaneMasahiro SakanePresident, Chief Executive Officer




27
No. 61371.

protest 296834-K (New York).

#### Gematex Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

GYPSIE JONES, CIV. NO. S-04-1827 DFL CMK

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER RE DISPOSITION AFTER

 NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

R&M ORTIZ, INC., dba GROCERY

OUTLET; JAMES P. READ & STEVEN

M. READ dba READ INVESTMENTS,

Defendants. 

 /

The court has been advised by plaintiff's attorney,

Scottlynn J. Hubbard IV, that this action has been settled. 

Therefore, it is not necessary that the action remain upon the

court's active calendar. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. That counsel file settlement/dismissal documents, in

accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160, no later

than October 20, 2005, and,

Case 2:04-cv-01827-DFL -CMK Document 11 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. That all hearing dates previously set in this matter

are vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 9/21/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01827-DFL -CMK Document 11 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 55255.

#### American Oak Preserving Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 162770-K, etc. (New York).

*364Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Desmond Dwann Shannon

No. 06

- 24

- 00009

- CV Appeal from the 6th District Court of
Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 92360 ).
Panel consists of Chief Justice Stevens and
Justi ces van Cleef and Rambin. Memorandum Opinion delivered by Chief
Justice Stevens

.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of prosecu tion . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the a ppellant, Desmond Dwann Shannon , has adequately indicated his
inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 17, 2024 BY ORDER OF THE COURT SCOTT E. STEVENS CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey , Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 12 (the “Partnership”) for the quarters ended December 31, 2010, September 30, 2010 and June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that such provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for the Partnership’s annual financial statements and except that the Report is a cumulative report covering each of the quarters ended December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2010 and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Melanie R. Wenk


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


Date: August 26, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
Delbeck, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of September, 2008.


/s/ Scott Delbeck
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P. (the Partnership) for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don R. Wellendorf, Chief
Executive Officer of Magellan Midstream Holdings GP, LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.



|                                                                 
|-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                 
|/s/ Don R. Wellendorf                                            
|Don R. Wellendorf, Chief Executive Officer Date: November 6, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership
and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Slip Op. 08-27**
**UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE** BEFORE: Senior Judge Nicholas Tsoucalas

________________________________________ CRAWFISH PROCESSORS ALLIANCE; : LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF : AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY; : BOB ODOM, COMMISSIONER, : : Plaintiffs, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : and : Consol. Court No. : 02-00376 HONTEX ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a : LOUISIANA PACKING COMPANY; : QINGDAO RIRONG FOODSTUFF CO., LTD. : and YANCHENG HAITENG AQUATIC : PRODUCTS & FOODS CO., LTD; : BO ASIA, INC., GRAND NOVA : INTERNATIONAL, INC., PACIFIC : COAST FISHERIES CORP., : FUJIAN PELAGIC FISHERY GROUP CO., : QINGDAO ZHENGRI SEAFOOD CO., LTD. : and YANGCHENG YAOU SEAFOOD CO., : : Defendant-Intervenors : and Plaintiffs. : ________________________________________:
**JUDGMENT** Upon consideration of the Department of Commerce’s Final Remand Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand , filed with the Court on January 28, 2008 (“Final Results ”), the Court finds that those remand results comply with the Court’s remand order in Crawfish Processors Alliance v. United States , 31 CIT __, Slip Op. 07-156 (October 30, 2007) insofar as they treat Fujian Pelagic Fishery Group Co. (“Fujian”) and Pacific Coast Fisheries Corp. (“Pacific Coast”) as affiliated parties pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1677(33)(E). Having done so, Department of Commerce recalculated Fujian’s dumping margin from 174.04% to 60.83% for the period September 1, 1999 through August 31, 2000, the period of review. No party objected to the Final Results . Therefore, it is hereby**ORDERED** that the Final Results are affirmed; and it is further
**ORDERED** that since all other issues have been decided, this case is dismissed.

**SO ORDERED.**

/s/ Nicholas Tsoucalas **NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS SENIOR JUDGE**  Dated: March 5, 2008 New York, New York
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 456 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 456

    To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize non-medical 
 counseling services, provided by certain mental health professionals, 
                         to military families.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2023

  Ms. Sinema (for herself and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following 
   bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize non-medical 
 counseling services, provided by certain mental health professionals, 
                         to military families.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Comforting Our Military Families 
through On-base or Remote Treatment Act'' or the ``COMFORT Act''.

SEC. 2. NON-MEDICAL COUNSELING SERVICES FOR MILITARY FAMILIES.

    (a) Non-Medical Counseling Services.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, a mental health professional described in subsection 
(b) may provide non-medical counseling services to military families at 
any location in a State, the District of Columbia, or a territory or 
possession of the United States, without regard to where the provider 
or recipient of such services is located, if the provision of such 
services is within the scope of the authorized Federal duties of the 
provider.
    (b) Covered Mental Health Professionals.--A mental health 
professional described in this subsection is a person who is--
            (1) a currently licensed or certified mental health care 
        provider who holds an unrestricted license or certification 
        that is--
                    (A) issued by a State, the District of Columbia, or 
                a territory or possession of the United States; and
                    (B) recognized by the Secretary of Defense;
            (2) a member of the uniformed services, a civilian employee 
        of the Department of Defense, or a contractor designated by the 
        Secretary; and
            (3) performing authorized duties for the Department of 
        Defense under a program or activity referred to in subsection 
        (a).
                                 <all>
```