alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 5,335.

#### The GEORGE KINGMAN.

[7 Wkly. Notes Cas. 50.]

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

May 2, 1879.

Seamen — Action fou Assault by Master.

[A master sued for an assault, and denying the same in his answer, cannot, on proof of the assault, rely upon a justification.]

label for personal damage by Mayhorn against Howes, master of the barque. The libellant was hired as cook and steward of the barque on a voyage to Portugal and back to this port, which was duly performed. During the voyage he was accidentally scalded by hot water, and alleged that before his recovery the master forced him to return to work with threats and oaths. That soon afterward the master assaulted him by kicking him in the face, which resulted in a temporary scar. That upon another occasion the master again assaulted him, and knocked him down with his fist. Each of the assaults was deposed to by one other member of the crew. There was no evidence of any permanent injury to the libellant. Upon the part of the master both assaults were denied, the kicking entirely, aDd as to the blow with the fist, the master deposed that the libellant attempted to pass him on deck on the windward side, and that he merely removed him by a slight push; also, that he was unsatisfactory as a cook, and very insolent under reproof. The master’s testimony was not corroborated by other witnesses.

E. F. Pugh, for libellant,

cited Payne v. Allen [Case No. 10,S55]; The Agincourt, 1 Hagg. Adm. 271; Pars. Mar. Daw, 401; Abb. Shipp. 17S, and notes; The Enchantress, 1 Hagg. Adm. 395.

Henry Flanders, for respondent.

Irrespective of the oath of the master, this is at most a case where the master was compelled to punish an insubordinate seaman. Fuller v. Colby [Case No. 5,149]; Forbes v. Parsons [Id. 4,929].

THE COURT

(BUTLER, District Judge),

referring to the danger both of encouraging such suits, and of refusing parties redress in such cases, held that the assaults had been sufficiently proved, and that as the answer denied the assaults, it was not competent for the respondent to rely on a justification. Decree for libellant for one hundred dollars, with costs.
<PAGE>
                                                                Exhibit 4.(a).35

              [FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY, NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSLATION]

                                 [State Emblem]
                           Ministry of Communications



      General License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of
        Mobile Radio Telephone (MRT) Services using the Cellular Method



                                Amendment No. 20


By virtue of the powers of the Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of
the Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, and after
having considered the arguments of Partner Communications Company Ltd.
(hereinafter: "Partner") we hereby amend the General License for the provision
of mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular method granted to
Partner on 7 April 1998,  as follows:


Amendment of Annex J

     1. In Annex J of the License, after Article 7.3 (h), a new article (i)
        shall be added:

        (i) it shall permit the International Carrier to directly collect
            payment for their services, from a Subscriber who is allocated to
            that International Carrier  and has chosen to receive from it
            charging and collecting services directly; the Licensee shall make
            available to the International Carrier any vital information that
            the International Carrier  may need in Order to provide charging and
            collecting services to an allocated Subscriber;

        (j) shall provide it's services to an allocated Subscriber that has
            chosen to receive charging and collecting services directly from
            their International Carrier on equal conditions and equal rates.




(8 October, 2003)


                   (sgd)                                  (sgd)
               ________________                      _________________
               Uri Olenik, Adv.                       Haim Giron, Adv.
               Director-General              Senior Deputy Director-General,
           Ministry of Communications     Engineering and Licensing, Ministry of
                                                      Communications
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1




               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our reports dated August 15, 2000 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Jaco Electronics, Inc. as of June 30, 2000
and 1999 and for each of the three years in the period ended June 30, 2000
contained in this annual report of Jaco Electronics, Inc. on Form 10-K for the
year ended June 30, 1999. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
the aforementioned reports in the Registration Statement of Jaco Electronics,
Inc. on Form S-8/S-3 (File No. 33-89994, effective March 3, 1995), as amended by
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of Jaco
Electronics, Inc. on Form S-8/S-3 (File No. 33-49873, effective April 10, 1998),
and the Registration Statement of Jaco Electronics, Inc. on Form S-8/S-3 (File
No. 333-49877, effective April 10, 1998).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

GRANT THORNTON LLP


Melville, New York
September 18, 2000
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

IXYS CORPORATION 
 2016
EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 NOTICE OF STOCK OPTION GRANT AND AGREEMENT 

 
  
  

							
	Name:	 		  	Option Number:	  	
	Address:	 		  	Plan Name:	  	2016 Equity Incentive Plan
	Employee ID:	 		  		  	

 Effective
                    , 20    , (“Grant Date”), you have been granted [a qualified/non-qualified] stock option to
purchase                  (                ) shares of IXYS Corporation common stock at
an Exercise Price of $             per share pursuant to the IXYS Corporation 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Except as otherwise defined herein, terms with initial
capital letters shall have the same meanings set forth in the Plan. A copy of the Plan is attached to this Notice and Agreement. The terms and conditions of the Plan are incorporated herein by this reference. Subject to the terms and conditions of
the Plan, this Option shall become “vested” and exercisable over a period of [            (    )] year[s] beginning on the Grant Date as follows: 

[Insert vesting schedule, including acceleration terms (if any)] 

By accepting this grant and exercising any portion of the Option, you represent that you: (i) agree to the terms and conditions of this Notice and
Agreement and the Plan; (ii) have reviewed the Plan and the Notice and Agreement in their entirety, and have had an opportunity to obtain the advice of legal counsel and/or your tax advisor with respect thereto; (iii) fully understand and
accept all provisions hereof; (iv) agree to accept as binding, conclusive, and final all of the Administrator’s decisions regarding, and all interpretations of, the Plan and the Notice and Agreement; and (v) agree to notify the
Company upon any change in your home address indicated above. 
 Please return a signed copy of this Notice of Stock Option Grant and Agreement to
[insert contact name and address of the Company], and retain a copy for your records.  
  

									
	IXYS Corporation	 		 		 	
					
	By:	 	  
	 		 	Dated:	 	  

	[Insert Title]	 		 		 	
				
	PARTICIPANT	 		 		 	
				
	  
	 		 	Dated:	 	  

	[Insert Title]
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4404 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 840 Front Street in Casselton, North Dakota, 

as the ‘‘Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4404 ES

1 SECTION 1. COMMANDER DELBERT AUSTIN OLSON POST 

2 OFFICE. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 840 Front Street in Casselton, 

5 North Dakota, shall be known and designated as the 

6 ‘‘Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

10 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Commander Delbert 

11 Austin Olson Post Office’’. 

Passed the Senate December 19 (legislative day, December 16), 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4404 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostDelbert Austin Olson Post Office’’. Casselton, North Dakota, as the ‘‘Commander al Service located at 840 Front Street in
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE 

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF LAW 

EXAMINERS

:

:

:

:

:

No. 792

SUPREME COURT RULES DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 15th day of February, 2019, Leslie A. Collins, Esquire, Dauphin 

County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Pennsylvania Board of Law Examiners 

for a term of three years, commencing April 1, 2019.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH ABDULLAH,

Plaintiff,

v.

CHOICE GAS & MINIMART; 

NORTH SACRAMENTO LAND CO.,

INC.; BP WEST COASTNPRODUCTS,

LLC and DOES 1 through 10,

inclusive,

Defendants.

____________________________/

No. 2:04-cv-1733-MCE-JFM

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND

DISPOSITION

Pursuant to the representations of the attorney for

plaintiff, the Court has determined that this case is settled.

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160,

dispositional documents are to be filed on or before April 10,

2006. 

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01733-MCE -JFM Document 13 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the

imposition of sanctions on any and all counsel as well as any

party or parties who cause non-compliance with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 21, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01733-MCE -JFM Document 13 Filed 03/21/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4479 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4479

   To require training on the Constitution of the United States for 
               commissioned officers of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2024

  Mr. Cruz (for himself and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require training on the Constitution of the United States for 
               commissioned officers of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Constitutional Orientation Military 
Mandate Amplifying National Duty Act of 2024'' or the ``COMMAND Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED TRAINING ON CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES FOR 
              COMMISSIONED OFFICERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Defense shall ensure that all newly commissioned 
officers of the Armed Forces receive training on the Constitution of 
the United States prior to reporting to their first operational 
assignment. The training shall include--
            (1) education on the centrality of the Constitution to the 
        commitment officers make to serve in the Armed Forces;
            (2) emphasis on the loyalty of officers to the 
        Constitution; and
            (3) instruction on certain aspects of the Constitution 
        relevant to military service, including--
                    (A) civil-military relations;
                    (B) separation of powers; and
                    (C) restrictions on the domestic use of military 
                force.
                                 <all>
```
67°45'E 68°E 68°15'E

“gg
35°30'N
“Go
39 42900 real :
ie
: Jj t
‘i ay
| es
35°15'N
39990000
EXPLANATION 0 10 KILOMETERS
—— Road & Peak |———_
—--— Stream, mostly intermittant [__] Image quadrant or tile 0 5 MILES

O City, town, or village
—- Province boundary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT PAUL, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1589 DFL GGH P 

vs.

T. GUZMAN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 5, 2005, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. That document was

not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted to the court for

consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served

electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a

document with the court on behalf of any defendant, then documents submitted by plaintiff must

be served on that attorney and not on the defendant. Every document submitted conventionally

to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate stating the date an

accurate copy of the document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and the address to

which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s notice of change of address on counsel for

Case 2:04-cv-01589-DFL-GGH Document 23 Filed 07/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

defendants and shall file proper proof of said service. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply 

with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff is further cautioned that failure

to serve any documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and failure to include a proper

certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed.

DATED: 7/25/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

paul1589.35a

 

Case 2:04-cv-01589-DFL-GGH Document 23 Filed 07/25/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**     I, Alain Delongchamp certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clearant, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 9, 2006 /s/ ALAIN DELONGCHAMP   Alain Delongchamp   *President and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)*  
28
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0191 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0191

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 May 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation on organic production and labelling of organic products (COM(2005)0671 - C6-0032/2006 - 2005/0278(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 102 E , 24/04/2008 P. 0108 - 0108 *

P6_TA(2007)0191

Organic production and labelling of organic products *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 22 May 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation on organic production and labelling of organic products (COM(2005)0671 — C6-0032/2006 — 2005/0278(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2005)0671) [1],

- having regard to Article 37 of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0032/2006),

- having regard to the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs on the proposed legal basis,

- having regard to Rules 51 and 35 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development and the opinion of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety (A6-0061/2007);

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended on 29 March 2007 [2];

2. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;

3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

4. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] Texts Adopted, P6_TA(2007)0095.

--------------------------------------------------
Before the Third Division,

April 18, 1947

No. 51670.

#### Protest 121188-K of Britam Agencies (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Inasmuch as no evidence was introduced at the trial to establish whether or not there had been a short-landing of the 26 raincoats, it was held that the affidavits submitted to the collector for the sole purpose of establishing that the regulations were complied with, were insufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s action. *Borgfeldt*v. *United States*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 421, T. D. 39433) and *Altman*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 868) cited. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.




Dated:     February
      14, 2011
                  By:
                  /s/
      Liu BoLiu
      BoChief
      Executive Officer
                    (principal
      executive officer)
36399000
33°20'N

367

33°10'N

3660000

68°30'E 68°40'E

EXPLANATION

—— Road & Peak
—-— Stream, mostly intermittant [__] Image quadrant or tile
City, town, or village |_| Image subarea
—- Province boundary
0 10 KILOMETERS

[}——

0 5 MILES