alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADY ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2136 GEB PAN P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner without counsel seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. 

On January 25, 2006, the court directed plaintiff to complete and to return to the

court two USM-285 forms and two copies of the amended complaint, which are required to

effect service on defendants Rumble and Mangis. On March 8, 2006, plaintiff submitted two

copies of the June 13, 2005, amended complaint and a USM-285 form for defendant Rumble. 

Plaintiff did not submit a USM-285 form for defendant Mangis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff one USM-285 form; and

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02136-GEB-EFB Document 89 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit to the court

one USM-285 form for defendant Mangis. Failure to comply with this order will result in a 

recommendation that claims against defendant Mangis be dismissed. 

DATED: March 30, 2006.

/mp

/004;arms2136.8f(2)

Case 2:04-cv-02136-GEB-EFB Document 89 Filed 03/31/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 10.10

                                    AMENDMENT
                                     TO THE
                        CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN


         WHEREAS, the Clifton Savings Bank (the "Bank") previously adopted the
Plan to provide eligible employees with severance benefits in the event of
termination of employment in connection with a change in control; and

         WHEREAS, the terms of the Plan allow the board of directors of the Bank
to amend the Plan at any time; and

         WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Bank desires to amend the Plan
to ensure compliance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the Bank amends the Plan as follows:

          A new Section 11 is added to the Plan to read as follows:

          "Section 11. Section 409A. If when termination of employment occurs an
          employee is a "specified employee" (within the meaning of Section 409A
          of the Code), and if the cash severance payment under Section 3 would
          be considered deferred compensation under Section 409A of the Code,
          and, finally, if an exemption from the six-month delay requirement of
          Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code is not available, the employee's
          severance benefit shall be paid to the employee in a single lump sum,
          without interest, on the first payroll date of the seventh month after
          the month in which the employee's employment terminates, provided the
          termination of employment constitutes a "separation from service"
          under Section 409A of the Code. References in this Plan to Section
          409A of the Code include rules, regulations, and guidance of general
          application issued by the Department of the Treasury under Section
          409A of the Code."


                             SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATE

The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the Secretary of Clifton Savings
Bank; that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of resolutions adopted at a
meeting of the Board of Directors of the Savings Bank held on December 3, 2008,
at which meeting a quorum was at all times present and acting; that the passage
of said resolutions was in all respects legal; and that said resolutions are in
full force and effect.

Date: December 17, 2008                        /s/ Walter Celuch
                                               --------------------------------
                                               Walter Celuch
                                               Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH LEE HARRIS,

NO. CIV. S-04-1646 MCE/PAN P

Petitioner,

v. O R D E R

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a

petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner asserts that

he is a putative member of the class in Valdivia v. Schwarzenegger,

Case No. Civ. S-94-671 LKK/GGH, and that his current custody

violates the conditions set out in the Consent Decree in that case.

Accordingly, the court hereby ORDERS that:

1. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of the petition on

class plaintiffs’ counsel in Valdivia; and

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01646-MCE -PAN Document 7 Filed 05/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The Clerk is directed to administratively close the case.

IT IS ORDERED.

DATED: May 19, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01646-MCE -PAN Document 7 Filed 05/20/05 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

June 11, 1962

No. 66848.

#### Lewis & Pina *v.*United States,

protests 60/27883, *etc.*(Laredo).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of face brick similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Bunker Hill Brick & Supply, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 2240), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# ***Exhibit 32.1***

# * *

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CHAAS Acquisitions, LLC (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Terence C. Seikel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 
|    /s/ Terence C. Seikel    |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Terence C. Seikel                     |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |
| May 122004                            |

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

William Jackson Kitchens,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1206 MCE PAN P

vs. Order

Pat Houge, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis and

without counsel in a civil rights action. 

The United States Marshal has returned process directed to

defendant Ben Parisi unserved because he could not be found. 

Plaintiff must provide new information about where this defendant

may be served with process. Plaintiff may seek such information

through discovery, the California Public Records Act, California

Government Code § 6250, et seq., or any other means available but 

must proceed with haste because Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) requires an

Case 2:04-cv-01206-MCE -EFB Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

action be dismissed as to a defendant not served within 120 days

after filing the complaint unless the time is enlarged based upon

a demonstration of good cause. If plaintiff’s access to the

required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff

may seek judicial intervention.

Accordingly:

1. The clerk of the court shall mail plaintiff one form

USM-285 and a copy of the pleading filed May 6, 2004.

2. Within 90 days from the date this order is signed,

plaintiff may submit the attached Notice of Submission of

Documents with a completed form USM-285 providing instructions

for service of process upon defendant Ben Parisi and two copies

of the pleading provided to plaintiff. 

3. If plaintiff does not provide new instructions for

service of process upon defendant Ben Parisi within the time

allowed or show good cause for such failure I will recommend this

action be dismissed as to that defendant.

So ordered.

Dated: November 8, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01206-MCE -EFB Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

William Jackson Kitchens,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S-04-1206 MCE PAN P

vs. Notice of Submission of Documents

Pat Houge, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff hereby submits the following documents in

compliance with the court's order filed :

 1 completed summons form

 1 completed form USM-285 

 2 copies of the May 6, 2004 

 Complaint

Dated: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-01206-MCE -EFB Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 3 of 3
No. 51711.

#### Protests 55965-K, etc., of Copeland & Thompson, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of oatmeals or oatmeal saucers the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Copeland & Thompson, Inc.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
No. 61373.

protest 301023-K (New York).

#### The Florn Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN HARDNEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1897 LKK GGH P

vs.

TOM CAREY, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 10, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Plaintiff did

not oppose the motion.

Defendants served their motion on plaintiff at California State Prison-Lancaster. 

On December 6, 2005, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address stating that on November 8,

2005, he transferred to California State Prison-Sacramento. On January 9, 2006, plaintiff filed

another notice of change of address stating that on December 22, 2005, he returned to Lancaster.

Based on plaintiff’s recent transfers, it is unclear whether he received defendants’

motion.

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01897-LKK -GGH Document 40 Filed 02/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within ten days of the date of this order, defendants shall re-serve plaintiff at

Lancaster with the motion to dismiss and file proof of service;

2. Plaintiff’s failure to file a timely opposition to defendants’ motion will be

deemed a waiver of opposition.

DATED: 2/3/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

har1897.ord

Case 2:04-cv-01897-LKK -GGH Document 40 Filed 02/03/06 Page 2 of 2
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-801 

________________________________________________________________________ 

MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE 

 Treaty Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and LIECHTENSTEIN 

Signed at Vaduz July 8, 2002 

with 

Exchange of Notes 

 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 LIECHTENSTEIN 

 Mutual Legal Assistance 

Treaty signed at Vaduz July 8, 2002; 

Transmitted by the President of the United States of America 

 to the Senate September 5, 2002 (Treaty Doc. 107-16, 

 107th Congress, 2d Session); 

Reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations 

 October 8, 2002 (Senate Executive Report No. 107-15, 

 107th Congress, 2d Session); 

Advice and consent to ratification by the Senate 

 November 14, 2002; 

Ratified by the President March 19, 2003; 

Ratified by Liechtenstein April 17, 2003; 

Exchange of instruments of ratification at Washington 

 June 5, 2003; 

Entered into force August 1, 2003. 

With exchange of notes. 


































NOTE: It is noted that in Artikel 7, the second paragraph numbered "2" should be numbered "3".








NOTE: It is noted that the title for "Artikel 18" differs from what is listed in the Table of Contents fo
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 -1-

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

RICHARD A. LATTERELL

Trial Attorney, Tax Division

United States Department of Justice

P.O. Box 683, Ben Franklin Station

Washington, DC 20044-0683

Telephone: (202) 307-6422

Facsimile: (202) 307-0054

Email: Richard.A.Latterell@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - AT SACRAMENTO

DAVID S. SAVAGE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Defendant. )

)

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Counterclaim Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

DAVID S. SAVAGE and PHYLISS SAVAGE, )

)

Counterclaim Defendants. )

)

)

Civil No. CIV.S-04-2316 WBS KJM

STIPULATED APPLICATION FOR

EXTENSION OF HEARING ON

SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION 

(THIRD REQUEST) AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

Currently before the Court is defendant the United States of America's Motion for

Summary Judgment against Plaintiff David Savage. Plaintiff David Savage has filed his response

in opposition, and the United States has filed its reply. 

The hearing on said motion is currently set for January 23, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. (PST) in

Courtroom 5. The parties respectfully apply and hereby stipulate, pursuant to LR 83-143 and LR

Case 2:04-cv-02316-WBS -KJM Document 41 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Joint Application for Extension Savage v. United States

-2- CIV. S-04-2316 WBS KJM

6-144, to an extension of time to continue the hearing to Friday, February 10, 2006 at 10:00 a.m.

in Courtroom 5 before the Honorable Judge Shubb. This is the Parties' third application for an

extension of time and is requested because counsel for the United States, who is based in

Washington, D.C., has another hearing in Sacramento on Friday morning, February 10, 2006. 

Respectfully submitted this 13 day of January, 2006. th

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

 /s/ Richard A. Latterell 

RICHARD A. LATTERELL

Trial Attorney, Tax Division

U.S. Department of Justice

Post Office Box 683

Ben Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Telephone: (202) 307-6422

Facsimile: (202) 307-0054

Email: Richard.A.Latterell@usdoj.gov

Attorneys for the United States of America

 /s/ Robert R. Rubin 

ROBERT R. RUBIN, ESQ.

McDonough Holland & Allen PC

555 Capitol Mall, 9th floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 444-3900

Facsimile: (916) 444-8334

Email: brubin@mhalaw.com

Attorney for plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-02316-WBS -KJM Document 41 Filed 01/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Joint Application for Extension Savage v. United States

-3- CIV. S-04-2316 WBS KJM

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Please do not request any more continuances.

DATED: January 18, 2006

Case 2:04-cv-02316-WBS -KJM Document 41 Filed 01/18/06 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerry Treppel, Chief
Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.




Date:
      August 16,
      2010
              
              /s/ Jerry TreppelJerry
      TreppelChief
      Executive Officerof
      Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Principal
      Executive Officer)





This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Before the Second Division,

January 2, 1943

No. 47871.

#### Protest 84414-K of American Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 43372 the claim that the tape measures in question are dutiable as household utensils at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Cancellation notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed Taxpayer Burden Reduction Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel has been cancelled (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting that was scheduled Tuesday, March 27, 2007 from 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. ET has been cancelled. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed-Taxpayer Burden Reduction Issue Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel was cancelled for Tuesday, March 27, 2007, for 12:30 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call as published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 22, 2007. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557 or write Marisa Knispel, TAP Office, 10 Metro Tech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201. You may also post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

Dated: February 27, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E7-3727 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. D-85.

#### In re Disbarment of Rothbart.

It is ordered that Charles J. Rothbart, of Northglenn, Colo., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6569

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee, versus CLARENCE COLLINS, Plaintiff - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-94-138, CA-97-221) Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: December 8, 2000 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* While the district court incorrectly noted the possibility that Collins’ § 2255 motion, filed on April 24, 1997, might be untimely, it did not base its dismissal on this ground. As we recently concluded, a § 2255 motion filed on that date is timely. See Hernandez v. Caldwell , 225 F.3d 435, 439 (4th Cir. 2000). 2 PER CURIAM: Clarence Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Collins , Nos. CR-94-138; CA-97-221 (W.D.N.C. filed Apr. 5, 2000; entered Apr. 10, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED