alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Chris Dick, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.


|                       
|-----------------------
|Date: November 14, 2008
|                       
|                       
|                       

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 31.02

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

         I, Kenneth G.C. Telford, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Essential Innovations Technology
Corp.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 16, 2006


/s/ Kenneth G.C. Telford
----------------------------
Kenneth G.C. Telford
Principal Financial Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10742)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1878.

(Decided May 5, 1964)

*Broolcs & Broolcs*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement herein consists of tires, tubes and tapes exported from Holland.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED THAT at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such merchandise as that specified below was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, were the following unit invoiced prices net packed:

> Invoice Per 100

> Tires Tires

> 6400 20 x 1.75 Vredestein Black $50. 66

> Tubes

> 2000 26 x 1.75 Butyl $32. 48

> 2000 24 x 1.75 Butyl $31. 50

> 6400 20 x 1.75 Butyl $28. 57

> Tapes Per 100

> 2000 26 x 1.75 $2. 77

> 2000 24 x 1.75 $2. 77

> 6400 20 x 1.75 $2. 77

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such merchandise as the remainder of the merchandise specified on the invoice herein was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States were the appraised unit prices less *8%*net packed.

> *542IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal to re-.appraisement herein may be submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that tibe proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is statutory export value and hold that such value for the items enumerated below is as follows:

> Invoice Per 100

> Tires Tires

> 6, 400 20 x 1.75 Vredestein Black $50. 66

> Tubes

> 2, 000 26 x 1.75 Butyl $32. 48

> 2, 000 24 x 1.75 Butyl $31. 50

> 6, 400 20 x 1.75 Butyl $28. 57

> Tapes Per 100

> 2, 000 26 x 1.75 $2. 77

> 2, 000 24 x 1.75 $2. 77

> 6, 400 20 x 1.75 $2. 77

and that for all other merchandise included on the invoice, covered by the entry involved herein, said statutory value is the appraised unit prices, less 3 per centum, net, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                  19,831
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  45,760
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                 139,803
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 208,992
<PP&E>                                               0                  46,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  31,017
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 275,507
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  46,750
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   7,040
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 219,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 275,507
<SALES>                                        163,301                 315,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  142,669                 276,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   426                     650
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  50                     100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 21,092                  39,672
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,721                  16,417
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    12,371                  23,255
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18                     .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17                     .33
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver 129582 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129582 COA: 260702 Kent CC: 90-052942-FC CURTIS LEWIS JONES, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e September 14, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

d1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
No. 46139.

#### Protest 26884-K of Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was established that the merchandise consists of miniature china articles in the-shape of teapots, sprinklers, coffee pots, and pitchers used for decorative purposes-and not for the service of meals. As to these items the protest was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6809

JEFFREY A. PLEASANT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PAGE TRUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-04-429-3) Submitted: August 18, 2005 Decided: August 26, 2005 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey A. Pleasant, Appellant Pro Se. Amy L. Marshall, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000). - 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeffrey A. Pleasant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s *order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition and denying his motion for discovery. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Pleasant has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santiago ROSAS-ARTEAGA, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-30202.

D.C. No. CR-99-06006-RHW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted April 17, 2001 *.

Decided May 3, 2001.

Before CHOY, SKOPIL and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Santiago Rosas-Arteaga challenges his sentence, claiming that the district court *502failed to consider the relative culpability of his co-defendants. The record belies that claim. Rosas-Arteaga and co-defendant, Manual Chavez, were both sentenced to the five-year minimum for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime) and two years for violating 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (using a communication facility to commit the felony). Even assuming that Chavez was more culpable, the record indicates that his potential sentence was reduced because he agreed to cooperate and he provided substantial assistance to the Government. Co-defendant Guadalupe Viveros, sentenced to two years for violating § 843(b), was not charged with violating § 924(c) and thus did not face the five-year minimum sentence for that offense. Because there is no substantial disparity or disproportionality in the various sentences and no evidence of an impermissible motive, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing Rosas-Arteaga. *See United States v. Bis-chel,*61 F.3d 1429, 1437 (9th Cir.1995).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Exhibit 31.1

CASH 4 HOMES 247

Certifications

      I, Gordon Forgey, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cash 4Homes 247.

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

      4.    The Registrant's other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and have:

            (a)   designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

            (b)   evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterlyreport (the "Evaluation Date"); and

            (c)   presented in this quarterlyreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of theEvaluation Date;

      5.    The Registrant's other certifying officer and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internalcontrols which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and haveidentified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

      6.    The Registrant's other certifying officer and I haveindicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actionswith regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:   August 19, 2004             /s/ GordonForgey                                                   Gordon Forgey                                                    President and Chief Operating Officer
No. 6596.

#### STATE, EX REL., PIERRE A. CASSAGNE vs. DEMOCRATIC PARISH EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, ET ALS.

Appeal from the 28th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. John the Baptist, No. 482. Honorable John E. Fleury, Judge.

Guión, Lambremont aiid Chenet, for plaintiff and appellant.

*274Opinion and decree, December 22nd, 1915.

P. E. Edrington, Jr., L. M. Reynaud, for defendant and appellee.

Per Curiam.

This case presents the same question involved in the matter of State, ex rel., Elfer vs. Parish Democratic Executive Committee, et als., No. 6590 of our docket, this day-decided, and for the reasons therein set forth,

The judgment herein is annulled and reversed and it is now decreed that there be judgment in favor of relator herein ordering and commanding the respondents herein to print and cause to be printed the name of relator upon all ballots to be used and cast at the primary election to be held in the Parish of St. John the Baptist on January 25, 1916, as a candidate of the Democratic Party for nomination to the office of Police Juror, Ward 5, of said Parish, and to certify relator’s name as such candidate to the Secretary of State of Louisiana; and it is further decreed that respondents pay the costs of both Courts.

Reversed.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0103 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0103

**EC-Malaysia Agreement on certain aspects of air services * **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0157 - 0157 *

P6_TA(2007)0103

EC-Malaysia Agreement on certain aspects of air services *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 April 2007 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Government of Malaysia on certain aspects of air services (COM(2006)0619 — C6-0004/2007 — 2006/0202(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2006)0619) [1],

- having regard to Articles 80(2) and 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0004/2007),

- having regard to Rules 51, 83(7) and 43(1) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0093/2007),

1. Approves the conclusion of the Agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and the Government of Malaysia.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
No. 46106.

#### Protests 783860-G, etc., of United Importers Co. et al. (Portland, Oreg., etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 75-1264.

No. 75-1276.

#### International Union of Electrical Radio & Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, Local 790 *v.*Robbins & Myers, Inc., et al.; and Guy *v.*Robbins & Myers, Inc., et al.

C. A. 6th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 425 U. S. 950.] Motion of petitioners for divided argument granted.
<table>
<caption>

                                                                                                    Exhibit 11.0

                                           COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                                       Three months ended  Three months ended  Six months ended  Six months ended
                                         June 30, 2007       June 30, 2006       June 30, 2007     June 30, 2006
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                       <c>                 <c>                 <c>                <c>
Income (loss) available to common
  stockholders                            $     2,095         $    (4,210)        $   385,428        $    38,530

Weighted average shares outstanding         2,659,568           2,693,286           2,667,358          2,693,678

Basic earnings (loss) per share           $     0.001         $    (0.002)        $      0.14        $     0.014

Income (loss) for diluted earnings
  per share                               $     2,095         $    (4,210)        $   385,428        $    38,530

Total weighted average common shares
  and equivalents outstanding for
  diluted computation                       2,659,568           2,693,286           2,667,358          2,693,678

Diluted earnings (loss) per share         $     0.001         $    (0.002)        $      0.14        $     0.014





                                                           21
</table>
**EXHIBIT 32(i)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Local Telecom Systems,Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-KSB forthe period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Patrick Q. McGeeney, President of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operation of the Company.     /s/ Patrick A. McGeeney       Patrick A. McGeeney     President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  March 7, 2006