alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4557 

To authorize the use of off-highway vehicles in certain areas of the Capitol 

Reef National Park, Utah. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2024 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the use of off-highway vehicles in certain areas 

of the Capitol Reef National Park, Utah. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLES IN CERTAIN 

4 AREAS OF THE CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL 

5 PARK, UTAH. 

6 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

7 (1) COVERED ROAD.—The term ‘‘covered road’’ 

8 means the portions of each of Burr Trail Road, Ca9 thedral Road, Hartnet Road, Highway 24, Notom 

10 Bullfrog Road, Polk Creek Road, Oil Ranch Road, 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4557 IS

1 and Baker Ranch Road that are located within the 

2 boundaries of the Capitol Reef National Park in the 

3 State. 

4 (2) OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE.—The term ‘‘off5 highway vehicle’’ has the meaning given the term in 

6 State law. 

7 (3) STATE.—The term ‘‘State’’ means the State 

8 of Utah. 

9 (b) APPLICABLE LAW.—State law shall apply to the 

10 use of motor vehicles (including off-highway vehicles) on 

11 a covered road. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 1

DAVID J. BEAUVAIS (CA Bar # 84275)

1904 Franklin Street, Suite 800

Oakland, California 94612

Telephone: (510) 832-3605

Facsimile: (510) 832-3610

Attorney for Plaintiffs

DENNIS KELLER and 

CRYSTAL KELLER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS KELLER, et al. ) No. CIV.S-04-1325 LKK DAD

) 

)

Plaintiff, )

) 

vs. ) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

) 

)

)

CITY OF STOCKTON et al., )

)

)

Defendants. )

______________________________________) 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED among counsel for all parties that defendants County of

San Joaquin and Jose Romero be dismissed from this action.

DATED: September 1, 2005

s/s David J. Beauvais 

DAVID J. BEAUVAIS

Attorney for Plaintiffs

Case 2:04-cv-01325-LKK -DAD Document 27 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 2

DATED: September 1, 2005

s/s Shelley Green 

Attorney for Defendants

CITY OF STOCKTON, SGT.

PREGITZER, KATHERINE

HENDERSON

DATED: September 1, 2005

s/s Daniel Cederborg 

Attorney for Defendants

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN,

JOSE ROMERO

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 8, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01325-LKK -DAD Document 27 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 11, 2018. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 11, 2018 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0067. JUSTIN NICKSON v. EXPRESS SERVICES INC. et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2018CV830
1 

### Chappell, Regina

From: Sasser, Erika

Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:41 PM

To: Szabo, Aaron; Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Henigin, Mary; Chappell, Regina; Corrales, Mark ; Cooperstein, Sharon; Orlin, David; Hemby,

James; Rush, Alan; Stewart, Lori; Koerber, Mike; South, Peter; Weatherhead, Darryl;

Langdon, Robin; Hetes, Bob; Kopits, Elizabeth

Subject: Part of EO12866 and 13563: Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone

(RIN 2060-AP38)-- RIA (Clean)

Attachments: EO12866-O3-NAAQS-RIN2060-AP38-RIA-FINAL_20150929.docx

Attached please find the clean version of the final O3 NAAQS RIA reflecting changes made in response to interagency

comments. Please let me know if there are any questions about these materials.

Thank you,

Erika1 

### Chappell, Regina

From: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:55 PM

To: Sasser, Erika; Frey, Nathan J.

Cc: Henigin, Mary; Chappell, Regina; Corrales, Mark ; Cooperstein, Sharon; Orlin, David; Hemby,

James; Rush, Alan; Stewart, Lori; Koerber, Mike; South, Peter; Weatherhead, Darryl;

Langdon, Robin; Hetes, Bob; Kopits, Elizabeth

Subject: RE: Part of EO12866 and 13563: Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for

Ozone (RIN 2060-AP38)-- RIA (Clean)

Thanks Erika. Just to confirm, I have received all 3 emails with attachments.

From: Sasser, Erika [mailto:Sasser.Erika@epa.gov]

Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 6:41 PM

To: Szabo, Aaron <Aaron_L_Szabo@omb.eop.gov>; Frey, Nathan J. <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Henigin, Mary <Henigin.Mary@epa.gov>; Chappell, Regina <Chappell.Regina@epa.gov>; Corrales, Mark

<Corrales.Mark@epa.gov>; Cooperstein, Sharon <Cooperstein.Sharon@epa.gov>; Orlin, David <Orlin.David@epa.gov>;

Hemby, James <Hemby.James@epa.gov>; Rush, Alan <Rush.Alan@epa.gov>; Stewart, Lori <Stewart.Lori@epa.gov>;

Koerber, Mike <Koerber.Mike@epa.gov>; South, Peter <South.Peter@epa.gov>; Weatherhead, Darryl

<Weatherhead.Darryl@epa.gov>; Langdon, Robin <Langdon.Robin@epa.gov>; Hetes, Bob <Hetes.Bob@epa.gov>;

Kopits, Elizabeth <Kopits.Elizabeth@epa.gov>

Subject: Part of EO12866 and 13563: Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone (RIN 2060

‐ AP38)

‐‐ RIA

(Clean)

Attached please find the clean version of the final O3 NAAQS RIA reflecting changes made in response to interagency

comments. Please let me know if there are any questions about these materials.

Thank you,

Erika
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIRECTV INC., 2:04-cv-2058-MCE-GGH

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

CRAIG HANRION,

Defendant.

___________________________/

On October 28, 2005, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which

contained notice that any Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations were to be filed within ten (10) days. No

objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the Court presumes any findings of fact are

correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th

Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

Case 2:04-cv-02058-MCE -GGH Document 20 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and,

good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt

the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed October

28, 2005, are ADOPTED; and

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment is

GRANTED. Judgment is rendered in the amount of $10,000 in

damages and $1,463 in attorneys’ fees against defendant Hanrion.

DATED: December 30, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02058-MCE -GGH Document 20 Filed 01/04/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3979]



[[Page 10198]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-305-000]


North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Proposed Change in FERC Gas 
Tariff

February 28, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 23, 2007, North Baja Pipeline, LLC 
(NBP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original 
Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 163, to become effective March 
26, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a4c4f584945646663646f597f7a7a65787e4a6c6f7869246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0a6a5b2a3af8e8c898e85b39590908f9294a086859283ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3979 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 47887.

#### Protest 957185-G of N. Y. Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Marcel irons at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as household utensils, following Abstract 38680; (2) brass base shells at 35 percent under paragraph 353 as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, such as signs, following *New York Merchandise Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 607); and (3) dime banks as hollow ware at 40 percent under paragraph 339, following Abstract 42749.
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements                of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934                (15                U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE:  | May                10, 2006 |   | BY:    | /S/                Scott V. Fainor                              |
|--------|-----------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                        |   |   | Scott                V. Fainor                                  |
|   |                        |   |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer            |
|   |                        |   |   |                                                            |
|   |                        |   |   |                                                            |
|   |                        |   |   |                                                            |
| DATE:  | May                10, 2006 |   | BY:    | /S/                Eugene T. Sobol                              |
|   |                        |   |   | Eugene                T. Sobol                                  |
|   |                        |   |   | Senior                Executive Vice President, Chief Financial |
|   |                        |   |   | Officer                and Treasurer                            |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to KNBT Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained      by KNBT Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.*

----
No. 47387.

#### Protests 849393-G, etc., of Allied Stores Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0878 GEB DAD P

vs.

C/O KISSINGER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On March 8, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed February 25, 2010, denying his motion to compel. Pursuant to E.D. Local

Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to

law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate

judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed February 25, 2010, is affirmed. 

Dated: March 11, 2010

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 202 Filed 03/11/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 202 Filed 03/11/10 Page 2 of 2
inbit_101.htm

EXHIBIT 10.1
 
ACTION BY WRITTEN CONSENT OF DIRECTORS
 
(Nevada Revised Statutes 78.315(2))
 
OF
 
INBIT CORP.
 
A Nevada Corporation
 
The undersigned, Sole Director of INBIT CORP., a Nevada Corporation (the "Corporation") pursuant to the Bylaws of the Corporation and the Nevada Revised Statutes, hereby consents to the following actions of the Corporation as of October 26, 2016. 
 
	1.	APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS


 
RESOLVED: That the Board of Directors hereby accepts the Resignation Letter submitted by Viktor Zeziulia from the offices of President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chairman, Secretary, and Treasurer effective October 26, 2016, and acknowledges that Mr. Zeziulia’s resignation from the Board of Directors is not effective until Ten (10) days following the mailing of the Company’s Schedule 14-F Information Statement to the Company’s shareholders of record.
 
RESOLVED: That the following individuals were appointed to serve as officers and/or directors:
 
	Tan Chee Hong
		CEO, Secretary, Director, Chairman

	 
	 
	 

	Choy Cheng Choong
		CFO, Treasurer, Director

	 
	 
	 

	Loke Yeu Loong
		President, Director

	 
	 
	 

	Teo Joo Meng
		Director

	 
	 
	 

	Zadey Che Wan Bin Abdulla Fadzil
		Director



 
	2.	OMNIBUS RESOLUTION


    
RESOLVED FURTHER, that the foregoing officer of the Corporation, and such persons appointed to act on his behalf pursuant to the foregoing resolutions, are hereby authorized and directed in the name of the Corporation and on its behalf, to execute any additional certificates (including any officer's certificates), agreements, instruments or documents, or any amendments or supplements thereto, or to do or to cause to be done any and all other acts as they shall deem necessary, appropriate or in furtherance of the full effectuation of the purposes of each of the foregoing resolutions.
 
This Unanimous Written Consent of the Board of Directors of INBIT CORP. may be executed in any number of counterparts and each of such counterparts shall for all purposes constitute one Written Consent, notwithstanding that all directors are not signatories to the same counterpart, effective as of the date first written above. This Unanimous Written Consent may be executed by facsimile and such facsimile copy shall be conclusive evidence of the consent and ratification of the matters contained herein by the undersigned director.
 
Dated: October 26, 2016
 
/s/ Viktor Zeziulia                                               
Viktor Zeziulia, Director
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GERALD COLLINS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2049 MCE PAN P

vs.

CALIFORNIA STATE GOVERNOR

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER,

et al., ORDER

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an application for

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that this matter is set for status conference on September 7, 2006, at 11:00 a.m. in

Courtroom # 25. 

DATED: August 28, 2006.

14

coll2049.oah

Case 2:04-cv-02049-MCE -EFB Document 23 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

Ju ly 2 8 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk Ju ly 2 8 , 2017

15 5380 ( 44 )

KERRI HUNTER OTTO, Next Friend of

BAILEY ANN MARIE NOBLE, Minor

, Plaintiff

- Appellee

, SC: 15 5380

v COA: 330214

Benzie CC : 14

- 009969

- NO

INN AT WATERVALE, INC

. , Defendant

- Appellant

. _________________________________________/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Heart of the Lakes Center f or

Land Conservation Policy to file a brief amicus curiae in support of the application for

leave to appeal is GRANTED. The amicus brief will be accepted for filing if submitted

on or before August 18 , 2017

.
The professional 

GIS drone

Technical specifications
Technical specifications

Weight (inc. supplied camera)

Wingspan

Material

Propulsion

Battery

Camera (supplied)

Carry case dimensions

Hardware

Operation

Approx. 0.5 kg (1.1 lbs)

80 cm (31.5 in)

EPP foam, carbon structure & composite parts

Electric pusher propeller, 100 W brushless DC motor

11.1 V, 1350 mAh

WX (18.2 MP) 

83 x 13.5 x 56.5 cm (33 x 5 x 22 in)

30 minutes

36 km/h (10 m/s or 22 mph) 

Up to 1 km (0.6 miles)

6 km2

 / 2.3 mi2 (at 974 m / 3,195 ft altitude AGL)

Up to 25 km/h (7 m/s or 15 mph)

Down to 1.5 cm (0.39 in) per pixel

Yes (inc. mid-air collision avoidance) 

Yes

Approx. 5 m (16.4 ft)

Maximum flight time

Nominal cruise speed

Radio link range

Maximum coverage (single flight)

Wind resistance

Ground Sampling Distance (GSD)

Multi-drone operation

Automatic 3D flight planning

Linear landing accuracy

Package contents

• swinglet CAM complete system with senseFly’s built-in 

autopilot & all electronics (ready to fly)

• Still camera (includes memory card, battery, USB cable and 

charger)

• 2.4 GHz USB radio modem for data link (includes USB cable)

• Lithium-Polymer battery packs (includes charger) 

• Spare propeller

• Carrying case with foam protection

• Remote control & its accessories for 

safety pilots (if legally required) 

• User manual

• Software access codes & license keys 

(eMotion 2, Postflight Terra LT)

• Software included: eMotion & Postflight Terra LT

For swinglet CAM updates

subscribe to our newsletter at

www.sensefly.com
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4686 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4686

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the disclosure of 
    the annual percentage rates applicable to Federal student loans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                July 11 (legislative day, July 10), 2024

  Mr. Barrasso (for himself and Ms. Lummis) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to require the disclosure of 
    the annual percentage rates applicable to Federal student loans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Transparency in Student Lending 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED DISCLOSURES.

    Section 455(p) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 
1087e(p)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Each institution'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--Each institution''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Disclosure of apr prior to disbursement.--In addition 
        to the disclosures required under paragraph (1), each 
        institution and contractor described in such paragraph shall 
        disclose to a borrower before disbursement of a loan made under 
        this part, in writing and in a form the borrower may keep, the 
        annual percentage rate applicable to the loan, taking into 
        account--
                    ``(A) the amount of the loan;
                    ``(B) the stated interest rate of the loan;
                    ``(C) the standard term for a loan of the same 
                type;
                    ``(D) any fees or additional costs associated with 
                the loan; and
                    ``(E) any capitalization of interest on the 
                loan.''.
                                 <all>
```