alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN D. TERRITO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1460 MCE PAN P

vs.

RICHARD W. SANDHAM, M.D., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 5, 2006, defendants filed a request for extension of the dispositive

motion deadline in light of plaintiff’s pending transfer. Good cause appearing, the January 27,

2006 dispositive motion deadline will be extended to March 13, 2006. All other dates set in the

August 4, 2005 scheduling order are confirmed.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants’ January 5, 2006

request for extension of time to file dispositive motions is granted. The dispositive motion

deadline is extended to March 13, 2006.

DATED: February 23, 2006.

001; terr1460.tro

Case 2:04-cv-01460-MCE -EFB Document 43 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

February 28, 1952

No. 56428.

protests 8777-K and 55329-K (New York).

#### Tuck High & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of playing cards composed of synthetic resin similar in all material respects to the articles the subject of Abstract 55297. The claim at 20 percent under paragraph! 1558 was therefore sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 28, 2011 

t0620 

Order 

 

June 28, 2011 

142149 & (32)(33) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142149 

 COA: 298635 

Kalamazoo CC: 2005-001534-FC 

JAMES HOWARD BELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 12, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to 

remand and the motion for extension of time are DENIED.
No. 63108.

#### W. R. Zanes & Co. of La., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 315312-K/15049 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose adequate reasons for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
No. 65520.

#### Arthur Garcia *v.*United States,

protest 60/19958 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4511 

To provide for the crediting of funds received by the National Guard Bureau 

as reimbursement from States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2024 

Mr. LEE (for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. CRAPO, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. DAINES, Mr. RISCH, and Mr. VANCE) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To provide for the crediting of funds received by the National 

Guard Bureau as reimbursement from States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guarding Readiness 

5 Resources Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4511 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF FUNDS RECEIVED BY NATIONAL 

2 GUARD BUREAU AS REIMBURSEMENT FROM 

3 STATES. 

4 Section 710 of title 32, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following new sub6 section: 

7 ‘‘(g) TREATMENT OF REIMBURSED FUNDS.—Any 

8 funds received by the National Guard Bureau from a 

9 State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the District of 

10 Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands as reimbursement 

11 under this section for the use of military property— 

12 ‘‘(1) shall be credited to— 

13 ‘‘(A) the appropriation, fund, or account 

14 used in incurring the obligation; or 

15 ‘‘(B) an appropriate appropriation, fund, 

16 or account currently available for the purposes 

17 for which the expenditures were made; and 

18 ‘‘(2) may only be used by the Department of 

19 Defense for the repair, maintenance, or other similar 

20 functions related directly to assets used by National 

21 Guard units while operating under State active duty 

22 status.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PRIME ENERGY
CORPORATION FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,979
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                        43
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,750
<PP&E>                                          42,093
<DEPRECIATION>                                  21,860
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,947
<BONDS>                                         17,716<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           760
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,704<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,915
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,226
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,410
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,002
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    989
<INCOME-TAX>                                        50
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                939
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       939
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
<FN>
<F1>                            F/S SUMMER       SOURCE
CURRENT PORTION LT DEBT            73             CFS
<F2>                            F/S SUMMER       SOURCE
ACCUM. DEFICIT                     53             CFS
TREASURY STOCK                  5,131             CFS
</FN>


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3843]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and ControlSpecial 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): The Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) 
020, ``New Laboratory Tests for Tuberculosis and Detection of Drug 
Resistance'' and SRIB 021, ``Development of Novel Information System 
for Remote Tuberculosis Control and Prevention''

    Correction: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
February 23, 2007, Volume 72, Number 36, page 8166. The reference to 
the acronym SRIB 021 in the SEP title is corrected to read SBIR 021.
    For Further Information Contact: Felix Rogers, PhD, M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Administrator, Coordinating Center for Infectious 
Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, 
Office of the Director, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop E05, 
Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone 404.639.6101.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 28, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office,Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-3843 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH MILLS, No. CIV S-04-1649-DFL-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 1, 2004, the court directed plaintiff to submit either an

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or the filing fee within 30 days. That order was

served by the Clerk of the Court on plaintiff at his address of record. That order was returned as

undeliverable on October 13, 2004. On March 3, 2005, plaintiff submitted a document to the

court. That document reflects that plaintiff changed addresses. In the interest of justice, the court

construes the March 3, 2005, document as a notice of change of address and will direct the Clerk

of the Court to update the court’s docket to reflect plaintiff’s new address. The court will also

provide plaintiff an additional opportunity to comply with the court’s initial September 1, 2004,

order. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with the court’s order may result in dismissal of

Case 2:04-cv-01649-DFL -CMK Document 8 Filed 10/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

this case. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update the court’s docket to reflect the

following address of record for plaintiff, as shown on his March 3, 3005, document:

Metropolitan State Hospital

11401 S. Bloomfield Avenue

Norwalk, California, 90650

2. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to re-serve the court’s September

1, 2004, order on plaintiff at the above address;

3. Within 30 days of the date of re-service of the September 1, 2004, order,

plaintiff shall submit either a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the filing fee

for this action; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new form Application

to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner. 

DATED: October 5, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01649-DFL -CMK Document 8 Filed 10/06/05 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 8509)

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States

Entry No. 11263.

(Decided January 12, 1956)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> *497IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein there was no foreign value or export value or United States value for such or similar merchandise; and that the cost of (a) materials, fabrication, manipulation, or other process employed in manufacturing or producing such or similar merchandise, at a time preceding the date of exportation of the merchandise involved in this case which would ordinarily permit the manufacture or production of said merchandise in the usual course of business plus (b) the usual general expenses (not less than 10 per centum of the costs enumerated in clause (a) above) in the case of such or similar merchandise, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the said merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, plus an addition for profit (not less than 8 per centum of the sum of the amounts enumerated in clauses (a) and (b) above) equal to the profit which ordinarily was added in the case of merchandise of the same general character as the said merchandise by manufacturers or producers in the country of manufacture or production who were engaged in the production or manufacture of merchandise of the same class or kind, was Canadian $00.21 per yard.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was Canadian $0.21 per yard.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Murray v. HDSP [Civ S 04-1367 MCE GGH P]/Stipulation for Dismissal of Glenn James, M.D. Page 1

WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES

1250 Sutterville Road, Ste. 290

Sacramento, CA 95822

(916) 456-1122

(916) 737-1126 (fax)

Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021

Erick C. Turner, CSB #236186

Attorneys for defendants

GLENN JAMES, M.D., JEFFREY ROHLFING, M.D. 

(sued erroneously herein as “Dr. Ralfing”), ROGER COX, M.D.,

S. MICHAEL ROCHE, M.D., HAROLD WAGNER, CCII, 

DANETTE JACKSON, CCII and TOM FELKER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES TAYLOR MURRAY,

Plaintiff,

vs.

H.D.S.P. MEDICAL CARE, DR. BROWN,

DR. JAMES, DR. RALFING, DR. DIAL,

DR. COX, DR. ROCHE,DR. SANDHAM,

CCII WAGNER, CCII JACKSON and T.

FELKER,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO: CIV S 041367 MCE GGH P

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT GLENN

JAMES, M.D.

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01367-MCE -GGH Document 46 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 Murray v. HDSP [Civ S 04-1367 MCE GGH P]/Stipulation for Dismissal of Glenn James, M.D. Page 2

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action that

defendant GLENN JAMES, M.D. be and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice, from the

above-captioned action, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(II), each side to bear its own costs

and attorneys’ fees.

Dated: 3/1/06 /s/ “James Taylor Murray” original signature retained by counsel

JAMES TAYLOR MURRAY, plaintiff, pro per

Dated: 3/8/06 WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES

By: /s/ “Erick C. Turner” original signature retained by counsel

ERICK C. TURNER, CSB 236186

Attorneys for defendants

GLENN JAMES, M.D., JEFFREY ROHLFING, M.D.,

ROGER COX, M.D., S. MICHAEL ROCHE, M.D.,

HAROLD WAGNER, CCII, DANETTE JACKSON,

CCII and TOM FELKER

IT IS SO ORDERED

Dated: 3/22/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

mur1367.stip

Case 2:04-cv-01367-MCE -GGH Document 46 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4578 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to require reports to Congress 

on State Long-Term Care Ombudsman Programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2024 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to require reports to Congress on State Long-Term Care Ombudsman 

Programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Long-Term Care 

5 Transparency Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4578 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPORTING ON STATE LONG-TERM CARE OMBUDS2 MAN PROGRAMS. 

3 Chapter 2 of subtitle A of title VII of the Older Amer4 icans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3058f et seq.) is amended 

5 by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 714. REPORTS TO CONGRESS. 

7 ‘‘Each year, the Assistant Secretary shall submit, to 

8 the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pen9 sions and the Special Committee on Aging of the Senate 

10 and the Committee on Education and the Workforce of 

11 the House of Representatives, a report that— 

12 ‘‘(1) aggregates all reports submitted under sec13 tion 712(h) for such year; and 

14 ‘‘(2) provides a summary of the findings of 

15 such reports.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
ttcm_ex103.htm

EXHIBIT 10.3

 
 
 
 
	 
	1

	

	 


 
 
	 
	2

	

	 


 
 
	 
	3

	

	 


 
 
 
	4
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Katy Industries, Inc. (the registrant);2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results
of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this annual report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Omitted in reliance on SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986 Section III.E];(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in the annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: March 31, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Anthony T. Castor IIIAnthony T. Castor IIIChief Executive Officer
---

Exhibit 31

PROSPERO MINERALS CORP. 
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION

I, Hubert L. Pinder, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Prospero Minerals Corp.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and we have:

a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  presented in this report any change in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5.  The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls.

Date: November 10, 2008

By:/s/ Hubert L. Pinder

Mr. Hubert L. Pinder 
Chief Financial Officer

---