alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 52990.

#### European Type Founders, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 51635-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the..entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Reap. Dec. 8683.

#### *Bunge Corporation*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York, N. Y. [Not published.] Motion by plaintiff.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the  Quarter  Ended  August 31, 2008 (the  "Report")  by
Advanced Media Training, Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




October 20, 2008                  By:  /S/ ROBERT STEVENS
                                       -------------------------------------
                                           Robert Stevens
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                           Financial Officer
---

---

Exhibit 4.(a).44

[FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY, NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSLATION]

[State Emblem]

# The State of IsraelMinistry
of Communications

General
License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of Mobile Radio Telephone
(MRT) Services using the Cellular Method

# Amendment No. 29

By virtue of the powers of the
Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law
(Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have been delegated to us, by all our
other powers under any law and after having considered the arguments of Partner
Communications Company Ltd. (hereinafter- Partner) we hereby amend
the General License for the provision of mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the
cellular method granted to Partner on 7 April 1998, as follows:

Amendment of Article 73A

| | 1. | After
the definition of Air time a new definition shall be inserted:
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | "Air time unit" | a time unit of no more than 12 seconds however as of 5 Tevet
                                    5769 (1 January 2009) a time unit of 1 second.
| | --------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amendment of Article 75.10

| | 2. | In Article 75.10-
| | -- | -----------------

| | (a) | In
sub-section (a), instead of units of time of no more than 12 seconds
               (hereinafter: a Unit of Air Time), shall come Air time
               unit.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) | In
sub-section (b), instead of time units of no more than 12 seconds               shall
come Air time unit.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4 Tevet 576516 December
2004

|/s/ Haim Giron
Haim Giron, Adv.Senior Deputy Director-General,Engineering and Licensing, Ministry ofCommunications | /s/ Moshe Galili
Moshe GaliliActing Director GeneralMinistry of Communications
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Before the Second Division,

July 13, 1942

No. 47394.

#### Protests 803399-G, etc., of Abouchar & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 23-a

                  CONSENT OF COUNSEL

     As Senior Vice President-Corporate Services and
Corporate Secretary of Kansas City Power & Light
Company, I have reviewed the statements as to matters
of law and legal conclusions in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000,
and consent to the incorporation by reference of such
statements in the Company's previously-filed Form S-3
Registration Statements (Registration No. 33-51799,
Registration No. 333-50396, and Registration No. 333-
18139) and Form S-8 Registration Statements
(Registration No. 33-45618 and Registration No. 333-
32636).

                          /s/Jeanie Sell Latz
                          Jeanie Sell Latz


Kansas City, Missouri
February 28, 2001
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Teresa G. Alegre,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-2379 FCD PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Gloria Henry, Warden,

Respondent.

-oOoPetitioner, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ

of habeas corpus. She challenges a 1996 murder conviction in San

Joaquin County for which she is serving a sentence of 25 years to

life.

July 7, 2005, respondent moved to the dismiss the petition

as filed outside the time allowed by the statute of limitation. 

A petition for habeas corpus challenging a state conviction

or sentence must be filed within one year from the date on which

the challenged judgment became final by the conclusion of direct 

Case 2:04-cv-02379-FCD-PAN Document 17 Filed 12/28/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

review or the expiration of the time for seeking such review. 28

U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(A). This limitation period is tolled for the

period during which a “properly filed application” for postconviction or other collateral review is pending in state court. 

28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(2).

Petitioner’s conviction was final June 30, 1998, 90 days

after the California Supreme Court denied her petition for

review. The limitation period then commenced and it expired June

29, 1999, long before petitioner filed her first state habeas

petition November 5, 1999. 

Petitioner opposes dismissal. She argues she is uneducated

and does not read or write English. She complains of the

deficient assistance provided by attorney Richard Dangler, whom

she hired in March 2002 to seek post-conviction relief. Events

related to Dangler occurred long after the limitation period

expired and have no relevance to the present motion. Petitioner

has not established any basis for tolling the limitation period

between June and November of 1999 and respondent is entitled to

dismissal.

Accordingly, the court hereby recommends respondent’s July

7, 2005, motion to dismiss be granted and this action be

dismissed as untimely. 

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 10 days of service of these findings and 

Case 2:04-cv-02379-FCD-PAN Document 17 Filed 12/28/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: December 27, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02379-FCD-PAN Document 17 Filed 12/28/05 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIRECTV, INC., a California

corporation,

NO. CIV. S-04-2534 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISPOSAL

DOCUMENTS AFTER

MICHAEL CROW, NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

Defendant.

 /

Counsel for plaintiff has informed the court that the parties

have settled the above-captioned case. The court now orders that

the dispositional documents disposing of the case be filed no later

than forty-five (45) days from the effective date of this order.

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby

VACATED.

////

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-02534-LKK -DAD Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 13, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02534-LKK -DAD Document 22 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4344]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP05-157-006]

Saltville Gas Storage Company L.L.C.; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 28, 2007, Saltville Gas Storage 
Company L.L.C. (Saltville) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Original Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, reflecting 
an effective date of April 1, 2007:

Original Sheet No. 15
Original Sheet No.16
Original Sheet No. 17
Original Sheet No. 18
Sheet Nos. 19-30

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
[email protected], or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4344 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 On January 26, 2006, this court issued an order adopting the November 2, 2006,

findings and recommendations. This order inadvertently failed to adopt the portion of the

findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of the claims against defendant

Shannon.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL DAVID WHITE,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-2276-GEB-GGH-P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al., AMENDED

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On November 2, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1

Case 2:04-cv-02276-GEB-GGH Document 87 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 2, 2005, are adopted in

full; and 

2. Defendants’ May 19, 2005, motion to dismiss on grounds that plaintiff failed

to exhaust administrative remedies is denied;

3. Defendants’ May 19, 2005, motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is

granted with respect to the following claims: 1) imposition of the R suffix caused plaintiff to not

earn appropriate time credits; 2) the claims against defendants Prosper and Shannon.

Dated: May 1, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02276-GEB-GGH Document 87 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 2
Appendix I

List of Acronyms and Abbreviations
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

I -1

AB Assembly Bill

ARB Air Resources Board

ATCM Airborne Toxic Control Measure

BACT Best available control technology

Board Air Resources Board

Bhp Brake horsepower which is equivalent to horsepower

CAA Federal Clean Air Act

CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association

CARB California Air Resource Board

CCR California Code of Regulations

CEQA California Environmental Quality Act

Certified engine An engine certified to ARB/federal newly manufactured off-road

engine emission standards

CO Carbon Monoxide

CO2 Carbon Dioxide

CI Confidence Interval

Diesel PM Diesel Particulate Matter

District Air pollution control or air quality management district

Diesel Risk Reduction

Plan

Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from

Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles

DOC Diesel Oxidation Catalyst

DOF Department of Finance

DPF Diesel particulate filter

DTSC Department of Toxic Substance Control

EO Executive Officer of the Air Resources Board

FSOR Final Statement of Reasons

FTF Flow-through filter

g/bhp-hr Grams per brake horsepower-hour

GSE Ground Support Equipment

HC Hydrocarbon

hp Horsepower which is equivalent to brake horsepower

H&SC California Health and Safety Code

ISOR Initial Statement of Reasons

μg/m3 Microgram per cubic meter

MOU Memorandum of Understanding
I -2

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard

NO Nitrogen oxide

NO2 Nitrogen dioxide

NOx Oxides of nitrogen

OCS Outer Continental Shelf

OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment

Off-Road Model Off-Road Emissions Model

PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons

PERP ARB’s Statewide Portable Equipment Registration Program

PM Particulate matter

PM10 Particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter

PM2.5 Particulate matter less then 2.5 microns in diameter

ppm Parts per million

Proposed ATCM Proposed air toxic control measure for diesel-fueled portable

engines

ROE Return on Owner's Equity

ROG Reactive Organic Gases

SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction

SIC Standard Industrial Classification

SRP Scientific Review Panel

SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District

SOF Soluble Organic Fraction

SO2 Sulfur Dioxide

TAC Toxic air contaminant

Tier 1-3 engine Engines certified to California/federal newly manufactured Tier 1, 2

or 3 off-road engine emission standards

Tier 4 engine Engines certified to United States Environmental Protection

Agency’s proposed Tier 4 off-road engine emission standards

tpd Tons per day

TSE Tactical Support Equipment

UL Underwriters Lab

Uncertified engine Engines that are not certified to a California/federal newly

manufactured off-road engine emission standard

U. S. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

ALINA GARCIA, Case No. CIV. S-04-1940 DFL GGH

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER RE DISPOSITION AFTER

 NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

INTERSTATE ASSURANCE COMPANY,

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY, JOYCE FRANCIS, 

FAMILY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

and DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Defendants. 

 /

The court has been advised by Robert Milligan, Esq., that

this action has been settled. Therefore, it is not necessary

that the action remain upon the court's active calendar. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. That counsel file settlement/dismissal documents, in

accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160, no later

than May 11, 2006, and,

//

Case 2:04-cv-01940-DFL-GGH Document 34 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. That all hearing dates previously set in this matter

are vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 12, 2006

/s/ David F. Levi 

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01940-DFL-GGH Document 34 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 2
hifr-ex103_435.htm



Exhibit 10.3

 

SECOND AMENDMENT

to Eighth Amended and Restated Rent Supplement

(CREZ Lease)

September 29, 2016

 

This Second Amendment to the Eighth Amended and Restated Rent Supplement (the “Second Amendment”) between Sharyland Distribution and Transmission Services, L.L.C. (“Lessor”) and Sharyland Utilities, L.P. (“Lessee”) is executed and delivered on September 29, 2016 and is effective as of September 22, 2016.  Capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise defined will have the meanings assigned to such terms in the CREZ Lease (as defined below).

 

WHEREAS, Lessor and Lessee are Parties to a Third Amended and Restated Lease Agreement (CREZ Assets) dated as of December 4, 2015 (as amended from time to time in accordance with its terms, the “CREZ Lease”);

 

WHEREAS, on February 26, 2016, the Parties executed the Eighth Amended and Restated Rent Supplement (CREZ Lease) effective as of January 1, 2016 (the “Eighth Amended Supplement”);

 

WHEREAS, on June 20, 2016, the Parties executed the First Amendment to the Eighth Amended Supplement in order to update the ERCOT Transmission Rate Allocation effective as of June 13, 2016; and

 

WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to further amend the Eighth Amended Supplement as set forth herein.

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree to the following:

 

1.Amendment.  The table titled “ERCOT Transmission Rate Allocation” is hereby amended by deleting the table in its entirety and replacing the same with the following:

 

ERCOT Transmission Rate


	
Allocation:
	
between June 20 and October 17, 2013:  65.3%

	
 
	
between October 17, 2013 and February 25, 2014:  84.8%

	
 
	
between February 25, 2014 and May 1, 2014:  83.3%

	
 
	
between May 1, 2014 and October 3, 2014:  80.9%

	
 
	
between October 3, 2014 and March 31, 2015:  75.8%

	
 
	
between April 1, 2015 and October 31, 2015:  72.7%

	
 
	
between November 1, 2015 and June 13, 2016:  65.6%

	
 
	
between June 13, 2016 and September 22, 2016:  56.8%

	
 
	
starting September 22, 2016:  49.0%




 

2.Continuing Effect.  Except as expressly amended by this Second Amendment, the provisions of each of the CREZ Lease and the Eighth Amended Supplement are and shall remain in full force and effect.

 

[Signatures on Following Page]




CREZ LEASE

 



The Parties have executed this Second Amendment as of the date set forth above.

 

 


	
 
	
SHARYLAND UTILITIES, L.P.




 


	
 
	
By:/s/ Greg Wilks

	
 
	
Name:Greg Wilks

	
 
	
Title:Chief Financial Officer




 

 


	
 
	
SHARYLAND DISTRIBUTION &

	
 
	
TRANSMISSION SERVICES, L.L.C.




 


	
 
	
By:/s/ Brant Meleski

	
 
	
Name:Brant Meleski

	
 
	
Title:Chief Financial Officer




 

CREZ LEASE
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Damon Williams, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 949]

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Jerome Hornblass, J.), rendered on or about December 7, 1992, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. *(See, Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on this appeal.

Pursuant to CPL 460.20, defendant has the right to apply for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals by making application to the Chief Judge of that Court and by submitting such application to the Clerk of that Court or to a Justice of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of this Department on reasonable notice to the respondent within thirty (30) days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry.

Denial of the application for permission to appeal by the Judge or Justice first applied to is final and no new application may thereafter be made to any other Judge or Justice. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.
SERVED JUNE 10,2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10GL0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNo.FAA-2010-0539 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009-GL-70-0354) has been 

assigned to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. AH future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronme A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Ju 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP10GL0004 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1OOO' 

ONE COPY 

Courtney E. Felts, Respondent's Counsel 

Staff Attorney, Federal Express, Inc. 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, 3'" Floor 

Memi^his, TN 38125-8800 

TEL: 901-434-8632 

FAX: 901-434-8283 

Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

DesPlaines,IL 60018 

TEL: 847-294-7862 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Rooni E12-3 20 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.