alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 78 1 . TRAVI S D. HODGES v . THE STATE.

In J u n e 2 00 2

, Trav i s D. Ho d g es p l ed g ui l t y t o th ree co u n ts o f arm ed ro b b ery

.

Si n ce h i s co n v i ct i o n , Ho d g es h as fi l ed m u l t i p l e p ro s e m o t i o n s i n t h e t ri al co u rt

ch al l en g i n g h i s pl ea an d s en t en ce, al o n g wi t h s ev eral ap p eal s in t h i s Co u rt

. 1 In 2 0 1 7,

Ho d g es fi l ed a m o t i o n fo r o ut -o f-t i m e ap p eal

, as s ert i n g , i n p art

, t h at h i s p l ea was n ot

k n o wi n g l y an d v o l u nt ari l y g i v en

. T h e t r i al co u rt den i ed th e m o t i on , an d Ho d g es

ap p eal ed

. W e affi rm ed

, d et erm i n i n g th at i t was ap p aren t fro m t h e reco rd t h at

Ho d g es ’ s al l eg at i o n s reg ard i n g t h e v al i d i t y o f h i s g u i l t y pl ea l ack ed m eri t

, s o t h e t ri al

co u rt d i d n o t err i n d e n y i n g h i s m o ti o n fo r o u t -o f-t i m e ap p eal

. See Cas e No

.

A1 8 A0 16 8 (J u n

. 2 6

, 2 0 1 8 ). In Oct o b er 2 0 2 1

, Ho d g es fi l ed i n t h e t ri al co u rt a “ m o t i o n

t o v acat e s en t e n c e a n d co nv i ct i o n,” ag ai n arg u i n g t h at hi s p l ea was n o t k n o wi n g l y

an d vo l un t ari l y gi ven

. T h e co u rt co n s tru ed t he fi li ng as a m o ti o n t o wi t h d raw

Ho d g es ’ s g u i l t y p l ea an d d en i ed t h e m o ti o n . Ho d g es fi l ed t h i s ap p eal

.

Ho d ges i s b arred fro m s eek i n g rev i ew o f th e t ri al c o u rt ’ s o rd er d en y i n g h i s

m o ti o n t o wi t h d raw h i s gu i l t y p l ea b ecau s e h e h as al read y rai s ed th is i s s u e i n a

p rev i o u s ap p eal

, Cas e No

. A1 8 A0 1 6 8

. See Ro s s v. S t at e , 3 1 0 Ga. Ap p

. 3 2 6, 3 2 7 (7 1 3

1 M an y o f h i s ap p eal s hav e b een d i sm i s s ed

. See Cas e No s

. A1 6 A2 0 8 3 (Au g. 2 , 2 01 6 ), A1 7 A 1 1 2 5 (Feb . 2 2 , 2 0 17 ), A2 1 A0 4 8 5 (No v . 2 3, 2 0 20 ). January 25, 2022SE2 d 4 3 8 ) (2 0 1 1) (d i sm i s s al o f p rev i o u s ap p eal “ co n s ti t ut es b i n di n g l aw o f t h e cas e”

an d p recl u d es ap p el l at e rev i ew o f i s s u es rai s ed i n p rev i o u s ap p eal ). See al s o Ech o l s

v. S t a t e , 2 4 3 Ga. Ap p. 7 7 5

, 7 7 6 (5 3 4 SE2 d 4 6 4 ) (2 0 00 ) (“ It i s ax i o m at i c t h at t h e s am e

i s su e can n o t be rel i t i g at ed ad i nfi n i t u m .”). Acco rd i ng l y , t h i s ap peal i s h ereb y

DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.
W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 01/25/2022
No. 50073.

#### Protests 991956-G, etc., of Schimmel & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from SEC Form 10K and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                         2218000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  7350000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (44000)
<INVENTORY>                                    5667000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              16824000
<PP&E>                                        11340000
<DEPRECIATION>                               (4952000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                23302000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          8397000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        750000
<OTHER-SE>                                      842000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  23302000
<SALES>                                      101462000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             101462000
<CGS>                                         92098000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 99970000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               45000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2235000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    886000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1349000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1349000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
        

</TABLE>
No. 60856.

#### Gat Cheung Co. and Lun Tai & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 291077-K and 290736-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 60311, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### Leon S. Harris, Plaintiff, and Michael Gangi Plumbing & Heating Contractors, Inc., Appellant, v Stony Clove Lake Acres, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[633 NYS2d 691]

—Cardona, P. J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Connor, J.), entered October 18, 1994 in Greene County, which, *inter alia,*granted the motion of defendant Stony Clove Lake Acres, Inc. for vacatur of a default judgment entered against it.

The issue presented is whether a corporation, dissolved by the Secretary of State, may defend a foreclosure action relating to its corporate assets. We answer in the affirmative. A dissolved corporation retains the power to "continue to function for the purpose of winding up [its] affairs” (Business Corporation Law § 1006 [a]). This includes the power to fulfill or discharge its contracts, collect and sell assets, pay debts and "do all other acts appropriate to liquidate its business” (Business Corporation Law § 1005 [a] [2]). Most importantly, a corporation continues to exist as a legal entity after dissolution for purposes of appearing in legal actions and proceedings *(see, Independent Investor Protective League v Time, Inc.,*50 NY2d 259, 262-263). Hence, it may "sue or be sued in all courts and participate in actions and proceedings * * * in its corporate name” (Business Corporation Law § 1006 [a] [4]; *see, Briere v Barbera,*163 AD2d 659, 660).

Therefore, defendant Stony Clove Lake Acres, Inc. (hereinafter defendant) may defend the foreclosure action against it in an effort to wind up its business affairs. We also concur with Supreme Court’s action in vacating the default judgment against defendant on the ground that defendant’s default was excusable under the circumstances presented here *(see, Pick*
      *834
      *ney v Wood, 165*AD2d 949, 951; *Bradley v Rogers, 125*AD2d 782, 783) and that it possessed a meritorious defense *(see, McKay v Longman,*199 AD2d 941). Finally, we reject the contention that defendant is guilty of laches, there having been no showing that plaintiffs have been prejudiced by the delay in question *(see, First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn, v Capalongo, 152*AD2d 833, 834, *lv dismissed*74 NY2d 945).

Mikoll, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
From: <james.tamm@dot.gov>

To: <Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Ed Nam/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, Robin Moran/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, <rebecca.yoon@dot.gov>, <Steve.Wood@do t.gov>

Date: 09/29/2010 08:31 PM

Subject: 2017

- 2025 CAFE and GHG NOI and TAR

- Updated Versions Based on Interagency Comments

Chandana,

Attached are updated versions of the 2017

- 2025 CAFE and GHG NOI and TAR based on all interagency

comments received to date. Changes in the TAR are also being reviewed with CARB. Unless there are

additional comments, EPA and NHTSA consider these drafts as final, and clean versions will be loaded

into ROCIS tomorrow morning. There are two files each, one with track changes and the other clean.



### Thank you in advance for coordinating interagency sign

- off.

Jim

James Tamm

Fuel Economy Division Chief

Office of Ru lemaking

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Rm W45

- 340

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE

Washington, DC 20590

202

- 493

- 0515
Before the First Division,

April 29, 1954

No. 58039.

protest 210671-K (New York).

#### M. Pressner & Co. *v.*United States,

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case relates to certain metal rings od the top of which is inserted a very cheap direction finder, which, in a vague and inaccurate sort of a way, indicates the points of the compass. The bottom of the circle is split so that it can be bent very readily (plaintiff's exhibit 1). The articles were assessed with duty at the rate of 55 per centum ad valorem, as jewelry, under paragraph 1527 (a) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802. Plaintiff claims classification for the merchandise as manufactures composed in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, and dutiable at the rate of 2254 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 51802.

The record consists of a sample of the imported merchandise, exhibit 1, *supra,*and the testimony of three commercial witnesses, all of whom appeared on behalf of plaintiff. A summary of the evidence follows:

The articles in question are sold to advertising agencies, novelty jobbers, candy stores, and five-and-ten cent stores. They are chiefly, if not exclusively, used on camping trips by boy scouts, between the ages of 7 and 13 years, as direction finders. The peculiar construction of these rings permits them to be used in different ways. The opening between the two shanks serves to make the ring adjustable to the size of a finger on which it is fitted, and for attachment to a knapsack or a belt, or fitted to fishing tackle.

The sample of the present merchandise, exhibit 1, corroborates the oral testimony to the effect that these rings are not ornamental or decorative in character. They are obviously cheap novelties. The testimony shows them to be a “five-cent item.” A sample is frequently a potent witness. *Marshall Field & Co.*v. *United States,*20 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 225, T. D. 46037. The appearance and the construction of the sample before us support plaintiff’s testimony to the effect that the present merchandise is not jewelry.

Since the parties have stipulated that the articles under consideration are composed “of base metal not plated with silver, gold or platinum and not covered with gold or lacquer,” we hold them to be properly classifiable under said modified paragraph 397 and dutiable at the rate of 22K per centum, as alleged by plaintiff.

The protest is sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NO. 2:04-cv-1955-MCE-PAN (JFM)

the STATE OF CALIFORNIA 

ex rel. MIKE STIERLI,

Relator Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

SHASTA SERVICES INC. dba

TIMBERWORKS; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive,

Qui Tam Defendants.

----oo0oo----

Qui Tam Plaintiff Mike Stierli (“Stierli”) has brought an Ex

Parte Application for an order vacating or continuing the hearing

on the Motion to Dismiss brought by the State of California, as

the Real Party in Interest in this proceeding. Said Application

is DENIED. Stierli has made no showing to justify relief on an

ex parte basis, as opposed to hearing the State’s Motion to

Dismiss as regularly scheduled. 

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01955-MCE -PAN Document 56 Filed 04/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Said Motion remains set for May 1, 2006, with opposition and

reply, if any, due in accordance with Local Rule 78-230 (c) and

(d). 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 18, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01955-MCE -PAN Document 56 Filed 04/18/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of WNC Housing Tax Credit Fund VI, L.P., Series 12 (the “Partnership”) for the quarters ended December 31, 2008, September 30, 2008 and June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Melanie R. Wenk, Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc., general partner of the Partnership’s general partner, hereby certify that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that such provisions require the audit report of Local Limited Partnership financial statements to refer to the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board for the Partnership’s annual financial statements and except that the Report is a cumulative report covering each of the quarters ended December 31, September 30 and June 30, 2008 and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Partnership.











/s/Melanie R. Wenk


Melanie R. Wenk


Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of WNC & Associates, Inc.


Date: August 26, 2011
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Strategic Internet Investments, Incorporated
  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
  I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the company, certify, pursuant to
  18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sction
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Signed: /s/ Abbas Salih
               
  Abbas Salih, CFO

Dated:
    April 13, 2004

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10290]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4073]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending February 
9, 2007

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: OST-2007-27218.
    Date Filed: February 6, 2007.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 526--Resolution 010j, TC3 Japan, Korea-South 
East Asia, Special Passenger Amending Resolution, Between Hong Kong SAR 
and Korea (Rep. of); Intended effective date: 15 February 2007.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E7-4073 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. NO. CIV. S-04-2483 LKK/DAD

RODNEY L. CUNNINGHAM;

PAMELA L. CUNNINGHAM; and

GUILD MORTGAGE CO.,

Defendants.

 /

On February 22, 2006, the court ordered counsel for defendants

to show cause in writing not later than ten (10) days from the

effective date of the order why sanctions should not issue for

failure to file a timely opposition. The government’s motion for

summary judgment was consequently CONTINUED to March 27, 2006 at

10:00 a.m. Defendants have failed to respond to the court’s

February 22, 2006 order to show cause and have also failed to file

an opposition brief or statement of non-opposition in accordance

with the Local Rules. 

////

Case 2:04-cv-02483-LKK -DAD Document 45 Filed 03/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, the court hereby ORDERS as follows:

1. The government’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

2. Counsel for defendants is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in

writing not later than ten (10) days from the effective date of

this order why he should not be further sanctioned for failure to

respond to the court’s February 22, 2006 order to show cause and

for failure to file an opposition brief or a statement of nonopposition brief pursuant to the Local Rules.

3. Defendant’s counsel is hereby SANCTIONED in the amount of

one hundred and fifty ($150.00). This sum shall be paid to the

Clerk of the Court no later than thirty (30) days from the

effective date of this order. Counsel shall file an affidavit

accompanying the payment of this sanction which states that it is

paid personally by counsel, out of personal funds, and is not and

will not be billed, directly or indirectly, to the client or in any

way made the responsibility of the client as attorneys' fees or

costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 22, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02483-LKK -DAD Document 45 Filed 03/24/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 60021.

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 176733-K and 179048-K (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef or veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 WRITTEN STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    Information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.
 /s/ dennis r. glassDennis R. GlassChief Executive OfficerApril 30, 2006/s/ reggie d. adamsonReggie D. AdamsonChief Financial Officer(Acting)April 30, 2006
 E-6
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The court assumes petitioner’s counsel will ensure that he receives a copy of this order. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEO ARCHER,

Petitioner, No. CIV-S-04-2249 MCE KJM P 

vs.

SOLANO COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a California detainee proceeding with counsel with an application for

writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner has filed two documents with the court. Because petitioner has

counsel the documents will not be considered. Petitioner is informed that he generally should not

file documents with the court, except through counsel.1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the documents filed by petitioner on April 20 and 24, 2006 shall be placed in the

court’s file and disregarded.

DATED: May 10, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1 arch2249.con

Case 2:04-cv-02249-MCE -KJM Document 23 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 1
# AD Grid Sheet Docket No.: FAA-2014-1123 Directorate Identifi er: 2014-CE- 037-AD AD Action: Final rule; request for comments This final draft applies toGA 8 Airvan (Pty) Ltd GA8-TC320 Airplanes; installation of fire-resistant washer and inspection ofthe engine isolator mount orientation. If acceptable, please sign the grid on the right with your first initial and full last name to show concurrence. CO N CURRENCES ROUTING SYM80l

ACE-112 D RUDOLPH

ROUTI NG SYMBOL ACE - 7 L

EGAL
DATE 

## t)•['(J ROUT1NG SYM90L ACE-113 R BALDWIN

ROUTING SYMBOL ACE-113 SR TW

ROUTI NG SYMBOL ACE-113MGR

RTGSYMBOL ACE - 101 MGR

RounNG SYI.IBOL ACE -100MGR

### Wessley, Scott (FAA) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Subject: Bateman , Marcy ( FAA) Tuesday, October 

### 13 , 2015 

### 10:13 AM 'AIR-ACE-100-KC FW: De l egat ion of Authori ty Wes wi ll be Acti ng Man age r th rough Fri da y, Octo b e r 

### 16. From: Bateman, Marcy 

### (FAA) 

### Sent: Tuesday, October 

### 13, 2015 10:12 AM 

### To: 'AIR-ACE-100-KC 

### Subject: Delegation of Authority Wes Ryan will be the Acting Mana ger for ACE-110 starting today at 2:00p.m. today through Friday , October 23.

1