alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Garry / Gary O'Neill <GOneill@energy.state.ca.us> To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com> CC: <mnichols@arb.ca.gov>, Jim Boyd <Jboyd @energy.state.ca.us>, PanamaBartholomy <Pbarthol@energy.state.ca.us>, Robert Oglesby <ROglesby@energy.state.ca.us>, Saul Gomez <SGomez@energy.state.ca.us>, SarahMichael <SMichael@energy.state.ca.us>, Tony Goncalves <TGoncalv@energy.state.ca.us>, <jones.toni@epa.gov>, <shrager.brian@epa.gov>, <wall.steve@epa.gov>, <Tesnau.Tab@epamail.epa.gov>, <Crawford.Tuttle@fire.ca.gov>, <Martha.Guzman-Aceves@gov.ca.gov>,<julia.levin@resources.ca.gov> Date: 7/15/2011 7:24 PM Subject: Docket Number EPA–HQ–OAR–2 002–0058 Major Source Boiler MACT and CISWI Rules Attachments: Jackson Lisa - biomass rules - 08 19 10 .pdf; Lisa Jackson US EPA Letter 071511 Jim.pdf

To Whom it May Concern:

The California Energy Commission respectfully submits the attached documents on behalf of California's Bioenergy Interagency Working Group regarding U.S. EPA's request for additional data and information related to the Major Source Boiler MACT and CISWI Rules.

Best regards,

Garry O'Neill Renewable Energy Program California Energy Commission Phone: (916) 651-0961 Fax: (916) 653-8251
# C_2006301EN.01001101.xml

| 12.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/11

---

Commission Notice concerning the trade arrangements for agricultural products applicable from 1 January 2007

(2006/C 301/04)

Interested parties are hereby informed that in view of the accession of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union from 1 January 2007, the Community rules on agricultural products will apply to the new Member States starting from this date.

Therefore, the arrangements for trade between Member States will apply to trade between the Community of 25 Member States and the new Member States and between the new Member States themselves in products subject to a common market organisation, without prejudice to possible transitional measures in connection with the new accessions.

Consequently, from 1 January 2007, import licences, export licences and advance fixing certificates may no longer be used in such trade.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAXIMILIANO MENDEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2447 LKK DAD P

vs.

DR. CRAPOTTA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has submitted a letter and copies of documents captioned for filing in this

closed case. On February 24, 2006, this action was dismissed without prejudice for failure to

exhaust administrative remedies prior to bringing the action. On June 1, 2006, plaintiff was

provided with the forms needed to commence a new action. Plaintiff’s September 15, 2006 letter

and documents will be disregarded, and no orders will issue in response to future documents

improperly submitted for filing in this closed case. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 13, 2006.

DAD:13

mend2447.58s

Case 2:04-cv-02447-LKK -DAD Document 42 Filed 10/16/06 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Anmore,
Inc. for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2004, I, Giorgio Saumat, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Anmore, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such quarterly report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending September
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended September 30, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ANMORE,
          INC.


Dated:    November 22, 2004

ANMORE, INC.


By:  /s/ Giorgio Saumat
-----------------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the quarterly Report of United EcoEnergy Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Robert Hipple, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Hipple
-----------------------------
Robert Hipple
Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10195-10196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3964]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL03-230-002]


Entergy Services, Inc.; Notice of Filing

February 27, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 20, 2007, Entergy Services, Inc. 
acting agent for Entergy Gulf States, Inc. filed a compliance filing, 
pursuant to the Commission's January 19, 2007 Order.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the

[[Page 10196]]

Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a 
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any 
FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#50161502131f3e3c393e35032520203f222410363522337e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5f3f0e7f6fadbd9dcdbd0e6c0c5c5dac7c1f5d3d0c7d69bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>, or call 
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 13, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3964 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 65510.

#### Bloomingdale Bros., a Div. of Fed. Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 233362-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8513)

#### Coast Bearing and Specialty Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 18814.

(Decided January 12, 1956)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows concerning the merchandise referred to below:

> 1) As defined in section 402 (a-f), Tariff Act of 1930, there is for the merchandise involved in this appeal no foreign, export or United States value, but the cost of production of the merchandise is the invoice value, as follows: Item No. 59.192.17 (U-1217), $5.35 each; item 59.193.18 (U-1218), $6.25 each; both net packed.

> 2) On this stipulation this case may be deemed to be submitted for decision.

On the agreed facts I find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the invoice values, as follows: Item No. 59.192.17 (U-1217), $5.35 each; item 59.193.18 (U-1218), $6.25 each; both net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 53563.

protests 144195-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Clark Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400' the court dismissed the protests.

Cole, J., dissented on jurisdictional grounds, citing *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.,, et al.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 158, C. D. 1175), *Fuchs Shoe Corp.*v. *United States*(id. 338, Abstract 53250), and *W. R. Zanes & Co.*v. *United States*(id. 339, Abstract 53251).
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-423.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

SCIENTIFIC COOPERATION 

Earth Sciences 

 Agreement Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and GABON 

Signed at Reston and Libreville 

September 26, 2001 and 

April 22 and 23, 2003 

 

 with 

 

Annexes 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
GABON 

Scientific Cooperation: Earth Sciences 

 Agreement signed at Reston and Libreville 

 September 26, 2001 and April 22 and 23, 2003; 

 Entered into force April 23, 2003. 

 With annexes.
No. 54050.

#### Wm. Filenes Sons Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 969189-G, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Exhibit 31.01

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

         I, Jason McDiarmid, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Essential Innovations Technology
Corp.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


Date: September 14, 2006


/s/ Jason McDiarmid
----------------------------
Jason McDiarmid
Principal Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

KEITH T. TOWNS,

Plaintiff, NO. CIV. S-04-1297 FCD DAD

ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. RE SANCTIONS

AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE COMPANY, 

TOWN AND COUNTRY TITLE 

SERVICES, INC.,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

1. The Final Pretrial Conference is continued to Friday,

March 31, 2006 at 2:30 p.m. Plaintiff and Defendant shall file a

Joint Pretrial Statement, on or before March 24, 2006, as

referenced in the Court’s January 3, 2005 Pretrial Scheduling

Order.

2. Plaintiff and Defendant’s counsel are ordered to show

Case 2:04-cv-01855-KJM-EFB Document 27 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

cause why they should not be sanctioned in the amount of $150.00

each, for failing to file a Joint Pretrial Statement.

3. Counsel shall file their responses to the order to show

cause on or before March 24, 2006.

4. A hearing on the order to show cause will follow the

Final Pretrial Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 14, 2006.

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01855-KJM-EFB Document 27 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 2
PUBLIC LAW 112–236—DEC. 28, 2012 126 STAT. 1627 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 3642: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012): 

Nov. 27, considered and passed Senate. 

Dec. 18, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

Public Law 112–236 

112th Congress 

An Act 

To clarify the scope of the Economic Espionage Act of 1996. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Theft of Trade Secrets Clarification Act of 2012’’. 

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT. 

Section 1832(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘or included 

in a product that is produced for or placed in’’ and inserting ‘‘a 

product or service used in or intended for use in’’. 

Approved December 28, 2012. 

Theft of Trade 

Secrets 

Clarification Act 

of 2012. 

18 USC 1 note. 

Dec. 28, 2012 

[S. 3642] 


dkrause on DSKHT7XVN1PROD with PUBLIC LAWS
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4558 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to the right 

of members of a federally recognized Indian Tribe in the United States 

and First Nations individuals in Canada to cross the borders of the 

United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2024 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect 

to the right of members of a federally recognized Indian 

Tribe in the United States and First Nations individuals 

in Canada to cross the borders of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Border Crossing 

5 Parity Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4558 IS

1 SEC. 2. MEMBERS OF A FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED INDIAN 

2 TRIBE IN THE UNITED STATES OR A FIRST 

3 NATION IN CANADA. 

4 Section 289 of the Immigration and Nationality Act 

5 (8 U.S.C. 1359) is amended by striking ‘‘who possess at 

6 least 50 per centum of blood of the American Indian 

7 race.’’ and inserting the following: ‘‘who— 

8 ‘‘(1) are members, or are eligible to become 

9 members, of a federally recognized Indian Tribe in 

10 the United States; or 

11 ‘‘(2)(A) has Indian status in Canada through 

12 registration under the Indian Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. 

13 I–5); or 

14 ‘‘(B) holds membership in a self-governing 

15 First Nation in Canada.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 61363.

protest 316179-K (San Francisco).

#### John L. Westland *&*Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

*499Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described as “Waddling Duck,” contained in cases T 21073 to T 21076, covered by invoice item T 40274, “consists of a figure or image of an animate object, wholly or in chief value of metal, having a movable member or part valued over 30 cents per pound, not having a spring mechanism contained therein,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the article in question. The protest was dismissed as to all other merchandise.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Principal Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ LEO F. WELLS, III      
|Leo F. Wells, III          
|Principal Executive Officer
|May 14, 2008               
|                           
|/s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS    
|Douglas P. Williams        
|Principal Financial Officer
|May 14, 2008
September 15, 2015 

Dear Mr. Spurlock: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA-2015-2313). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make, model, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing,rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) 

for the proposed UAS operation. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 9/29/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARSHALL LOSKOT, an individual; and ) NO. CIV. S-04-1992 GEB PAN

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, )

EDUCATION, SERVICES: HELPING YOU HELP )

OTHERS, a California public benefit )

corporation, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) ORDER

v. ) 

)

UNITED PETROLEUM TRUCK STOP; RAKESH )

SEHGAL, an individual; and SEHGAL, )

INC., a California corporation, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiffs’ counsel filed a unilateral status report one day

late, wherein Plaintiffs request continuance of the Status Conference

now scheduled for June 20, 2005. Plaintiffs are warned that a filing

deadline prescribed in a Rule 16 Order should not be disregarded. 

Plaintiffs and their counsel risk having to respond to an Order to

Show Cause regarding sanctions when they fail to comply with ordered

deadlines.

The status conference is rescheduled for hearing on

August 29, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiffs are required to file a

Case 2:04-cv-01992-GEB-PAN Document 30 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

status report no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the scheduling

conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 9, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01992-GEB-PAN Document 30 Filed 06/10/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 44996.

#### Protest 14698-K of Taiyo Trading Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of cabinets in chief value of wood similar to those the subject of Abstract 37636. The claim at 33)4 percent under paragraph 412 was therefore sustained.