alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10198-10199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3999]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-311-000]


Northern Border Pipeline Company; Notice Of Tariff Filing

March 1, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 27, 2007, Northern Border Pipeline 
Company (Northern Border) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets attached to the 
filing, to become effective April 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed

[[Page 10199]]

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adebe8ffeee2c3c1c4c3c8fed8ddddc2dfd9edcbc8dfce83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3e5e6f1e0eccdcfcacdc6f0d6d3d3ccd1d7e3c5c6d1c08dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3999 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 27, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

128964 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan DEWEY TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 128964 COA: 259681 WCAC: 01-000381 CROWN VANTAGE CORPORATION, and INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1219 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 27, 2005

Clerk
No. 54067.

#### Consumer’s Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 51761-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1830 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 122 ) IV-C-8

8 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:57

AM Sheet 122 of 232_****>* > P. 2

< T _N J i m.mm '<

i \ ^W/J S UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO NAGENC Y * -VK/-J

WASHINGTON, D.C . 2046 0 

### \TM^ FE B 

### 2 6 198 8

OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N Honorabl e Edwar d F . Feigha n Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D . C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Feighan : Thank yo u fo r you r lette r o f February10 , 1988 , forwarding a lette r fro

mon e o f you r constituents , Mr . Charle s J . Sims , expressing hi s view s o f EPA' s proposa l t o requir e onboar d refueling emissio n controls . Thi s lette r wil l be place d in the publi c docke t t o be considere d alon

g wit h man

yother s w e hav e receive d o n thi s importan t issue . Sincerel yyours ,

" ' >- , v- i r . A M Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s cc : Docke t A-87-1 1
No. 46728.

#### Protest 67340-K of G. A. Westphal & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the music boxes in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 28022 the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 1541 was sustained. >
Before The Third Division,

October 13, 1948

No. 52613.

protests 56708-K and 56705-K (Cleveland).

#### The May Company and The A. W. Fenton Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
**Exhibit 32.01**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION** **1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report of Essential Innovations Technology Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jason McDiarmid, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Jason McDiarmid

Jason McDiarmid

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer

September 22, 2008

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 11.0

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             Three months ended       Three months ended
                                                               March 31, 2006           March 31, 2005
                                                          --------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>                      <C>
Income available to common stockholders                                  42,740                  102,883

Weighted average shares outstanding                                   2,694,074                2,663,059

Basic earnings per share                                                   0.02                     0.04

Income for diluted earnings per share                                    42,740                  102,883

Total weighted average common shares and
    equivalents outstanding for diluted computation                   2,694,074                2,663,059

Diluted earnings per share                                                 0.02                     0.04
</TABLE>

                                       18
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FERNANDO SHAH,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1323 DFL KJM P

vs.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, et al., ORDER

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-01323-DFL -KJM Document 5 Filed 06/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 8, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED: 6/24/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01323-DFL -KJM Document 5 Filed 06/27/05 Page 2 of 2
PUBLIC LAW 111–299—DEC. 14, 2010 124 STAT. 3269 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5706: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111–591 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Sept. 15, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 1, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–299 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the building occupied by the Government Printing Office located at 

31451 East United Avenue in Pueblo, Colorado, as the ‘‘Frank Evans Government 

Printing Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The building occupied by the Government Printing Office 

located at 31451 East United Avenue in Pueblo, Colorado, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘Frank Evans Government Printing 

Office Building’’ during the period in which the building is occupied 

by the Government Printing Office. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

With respect to the period in which the building referred to 

in section 1 is occupied by the Government Printing Office, any 

reference in a law, map, regulation, document, record, or other 

paper of the United States to that building shall be deemed to 

be a reference to the ‘‘Frank Evans Government Printing Office 

Building’’. 

Approved December 14, 2010. 

Dec. 14, 2010 

[H.R. 5706] 


ebenthall on DSK9Q6SHH1PROD with PUBLAW
No. 55944.

protests 172160-K, etc. (New York).

#### C. N. Cangemi et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400' the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P. (the
Partnership) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Chandler, Chief Financial Officer of Magellan Midstream Holdings
GP, LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ John D. Chandler                     
|John D. Chandler, Chief Financial Officer
|Date: November 3, 2008                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership
and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(C. D. 511)

#### Leo G. Stein *&*Co. *v.*United States

United States Customs Court, Third Division

(Decided June 6, 1941)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*(J. *Stuart Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Charles D. Lawrence,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *{Richard H. Welsh*and *Joseph A. Howard, Jr.,*special attorneys), for the defendant.

Before Cline and Keefe, Judges

Keefe, Judge:

This suit involves the classification of certain Dalmore Octagon Curriers Clearing Stones imported from Glasgow, Scotland. The merchandise was assessed for duty at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 214 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as earthy or mineral substances. The plaintiffs claim that these particular articles consist of hones or whetstones and as such are entitled to free entry under the *eo nomine*provision therefor in paragraph 1692.

At the trial two witnesses testified for the plaintiffs that the stones in question are used to sharpen knives such as are used in tanners’ establishments and are sold for that purpose throughout the country, *444and that practically every tannery has one or more stones ranging in size from 4 up to 8 inches, octagon shape, for the purpose of sharpening small trimming knives, currier’s knives, and slicker knives. In the opinion of the witnesses a hone consisted of a long, narrow-stone, 7 or 8 inches long and 2 inches wide, while a whetstone is larger in size but used for the same purpose and included the stones in question.

One witness testified for the Government that stones similar to the stones in question are principally used to polish copper cylinders that are used in rotogravure printing and by textile printers. The witness admitted, however, that the rotogravure printer prefers a larger stone, and it is quite possible that stones measuring 6 by 6 inches, 7 by 7 inches, or 8 by 8 inches, might be used for purposes other than rotogravure work, and that it was quite possible that they might be used chiefly by tanners as whetstones as distinguished from the use to which such stones would be applied by rotogravure printers or in textile works.

The stones in question herein range in size from 4 by 4K inches to 8 by 8 inches by *l}í*to 5 inches in thickness. The preponderance of evidence produced unquestionably establishes that clearing stones in the sizes here imported are whetstones and principally used for that purpose. In fact, counsel for the Government admitted that there is no question about such stones being used for the sharpening of knives. Judgment will therefore be entered in favor of the plaintiffs, directing the collector to reliquidate the entry, making refund of all duty taken.
No. 57720.

#### Mutual Supply Co. *v.*United States,

protest 205609-K (San Francisco) .

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as that involved in *United States*v. *Nippon Co.*(32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked with the letter “A” were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1705 as kelp, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured.
(Reap. Dec. 9486)

#### Global Commodities Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 780439.

(Decided July 31, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidsoníov*the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement on a stipulation upon the agreed facts in which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved, and that such value was the appraised value, packed, less 5 per centum buying commission as indicated on the invoice.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of Sitestar Corporation, (the “Company”) on
Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Frank Erhartic,
Jr., Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and Daniel Judd,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1.  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Frank Erhartic,
      Jr.
                  
                  /s/ Daniel JuddFrank
      Erhartic, Jr.
                  
                  Daniel
      JuddChief
      Executive Officer and President
                  
                  Chief
      Financial OfficerMay
      18, 2009
                  
                  May
      18, 2009
No. 55962.

protests 146767-K, etc. (New York).

#### Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Nilo P, a combination of castor oil, oleic acid, and caustic potash, similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 55174, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES T. DAVIS, No. 2:04-cv-0878 GEB DAD P

Plaintiff, ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT

vs. CHARLES T. DAVIS, CDCR #P-05063,

PLAINTIFF

C/O KISSINGER, et al.,

DATE: October 23, 2012

Defendants. TIME: 9:00 a.m.

 /

Charles Davis, CDCR inmate # P-05063, a necessary and material witness in a

settlement conference in this case on October 23, 2012, is confined in Pleasant Valley State

Prison (PVSP), 24863 West Jayne Avenue, Coalinga, California 93210, in the custody of the

Warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus

ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before Magistrate

Judge Gregory G. Hollows at the U.S. District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814

in Courtroom #9, at 9:00 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum (Docket No. 213) entered

August 2, 2012 is hereby VACATED.

2. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a settlement

conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as

ordered by Judge Hollows; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution or other

appropriate facility at the discretion of the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation; 

3. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this

inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden, PVSP, P. O. Box 8500, Coalinga, California, 93210:

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge

Hollows, at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered

by Judge Hollows; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution, or other

appropriate facility at the discretion of the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation. This inmate’s legal property, relevant to the above entitled case, shall accompany

the inmate.

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

1

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 215 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody

of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

DATED: September 13, 2012.

DAD:dpw

DAD1/prisoner-civil rights/davi0878.841(2)

2

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 215 Filed 09/14/12 Page 2 of 2