alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                         AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Anmore,
Inc. for the Quarter Ending June 30, 2004, I, Giorgio Saumat, Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Anmore, Inc. hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

     1.   Such quarterly report of Form 10-QSB for the period ending June
          30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
          the period ended June 30, 2004, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ANMORE,
          INC.


Dated:    August 19, 2004

ANMORE, INC.


By:  /s/ Giorgio Saumat
-----------------------------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
In-Person Attendees: The Test Procedure for Packaged Terminal Air Conditioners (PTACs) Meeting Meeting Date: Monday, April 28, 2014 Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Email Armstrong, Ashley General Engineer U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence Avenue, SW WashingtonDC 20585-0121 202-586-6590202-586-4617Ashley.Armstrong@ee.doe.gov
Burgos, Javier Senior Consultant Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 South Bedford Street, Suite 400 Burlington MA 01803 781-270-8371 781-270-0418javier.burgos@navigant.com
Case, David Trial Attorney General Counsel 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W. WashingtonDC 20585 202-287-6998 N/A david.case@hq.doe.gov
Fernstrom, Gary Sr. Project Manager CA IOU(s) Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) 13055 Parkhurst Drive Oakland CA 94619 510-363-1787 N/A gfernstrom@msn.com gbf1@pge.com Majette, Ronald Architect, Project Manager U.S. Department of State 950 L'Enfant Plaza, S.W WashingtonDC 20585 202-586-7935 N/A ronald.majette@ee.doe.gov
Petrillo-Groh, Laura G. Senior Certification Engineer Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute (AHRI) 2111 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 500 Arlington VA 22201-3001 703-600-0335 703-552-1942 lpetrillo-groh@ahrinet.org
Tharp, Rusty Director of Regulatory Affairs Goodman Manufacturing Company, L.P. Amana Heating and Air Conditioning 10787 Clay Road Houston TX 77041 713-263-5906713-586-8006 Russell.Tharp@goodmanmfg.com
No. 65505.

#### Seymour Smith & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/8418 (New York).

*442Opinion by

Kao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grape shears similar in all material respects to those the subject of *John H. Graham & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 67, C.D. 2022), the claim of the plaintiff: was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1   SUNCOAST NATURALS, INC.

   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
         (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, William J. Reilly, Chairman, and Director "principal executive officer") of
Suncoast Naturals, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2004 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a)[15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Registrant.


Dated: August 12, 2004    /s/ WILLIAM J. REILLY
                        ---------------------
                          William J. Reilly
                          Chairman and Director
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4364]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration <greek-i>10821 and <greek-i>10822]


Alabama Disaster <greek-i>AL-00007

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for the State of Alabama (FEMA-1687-DR), dated 03/03/2007.
    Incident: Severe Storms and Tornadoes.
    Incident Period: 03/01/2007.
    Effective Date: 03/03/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 05/02/2007.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/03/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 03/03/2007, applications 
for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other 
locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Coffee.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only): Alabama: Covington, 
Crenshaw, Dale, Geneva, and Pike.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                 Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere..................     5.750
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere...............     2.875
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere..................     8.000
  Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit           5.250
   Available Elsewhere........................................
  Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit           4.000
   Available Elsewhere........................................
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses and Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without           4.000
   Credit Available Elsewhere.................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10821B 
and for economic injury is 108220.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008.)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-4364 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

O Z MARTIN, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2234 FCD KJM P

vs.

EDWARD ALMEIDA, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to the

defendants’ June 10, 2005 motion to dismiss. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s June 21, 2005 motion for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and

serve an opposition to the defendants’ June 10, 2005 motion to dismiss. Defendants’ reply, if

any, shall be filed seven days thereafter.

DATED: June 27, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/bb mart2234.36

Case 2:04-cv-02234-FCD-KJM Document 17 Filed 06/28/05 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-60744

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARMAND DWIGHT WILLIAMS, also known as Armoand Dwight

Williams, also known as Manuel Dwight Williams,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:99-CR-2-1-WS

- - - - - - - - - -

 November 10, 2000

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Armand Dwight Williams appeals his conviction of sexual abuse,

in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2242(2)(A). Williams, a member of the

Choctaw Indian tribe, had been accused of engaging in sexual

intercourse with an adult Choctaw female, whom he knew at the time

to be “incapable of appraising the nature of the conduct.”

Williams contends that the evidence was insufficient to

support his conviction, in that the conviction depended on the

victim’s testimony that she had been asleep throughout Williams’
No. 99-60744

-2-

actions of taking off her shorts and initiating sexual intercourse

with her. Because Williams failed to move for a judgment of

acquittal at the close of the evidence, this court reviews the

sufficiency of the evidence only for plain error, meaning that the

conviction will be reversed only to avoid a “manifest miscarriage

of justice.” See United States v. Parker, 133 F.3d 322, 328 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1142 (1998). Because the evidence

was sufficient to authorize the jury to determine that the victim

testified truthfully when she maintained that she had been sleeping

when she awoke to realize that Williams was sexually penetrating

her, no manifest miscarriage of justice is apparent. 

The conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 10

- 00232

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K .M., A

CHILD

------------

FROM THE 231ST DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

On July 7, 2010, and July 20, 2010 , we notified appellant, in accordance

with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless

the $175 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). Appellant has not paid

the $175 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court ’s order of August 28, 2007, 2

w e dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 See Supreme Court of Tex., Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil

Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation , Misc. Docket No. 07

- 9138 (Aug. 28, 2007) (listing

fees in courts of appeals).2

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 5, 2010
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 5 2004 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

CLEO ANTHONY McGREGOR,

Petitioner,

v. JOHN ASHCROFT,

Respondent. No. 04-9593 (BIA No. A44-845-104-Aurora) (Petition for Review)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *
Before, SEYMOUR , HENRY , and TYMKOVICH , Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Cleo McGregor, a native and citizen of J amaica appearing pro se, has filed a paper styled “Detained Alien: Notice o f Appeal, Immediate Action Requested,” which we construe as a petition for rev iew, a motion for a stay of removal pending review, and a request for release f rom immigration custody. The immigration judge found, and petitioner concedes, t hat he is removable because he was convicted of an aggravated felony. He argue s that his conviction should2--

be vacated, but he has only just filed a motion to withdraw his guilty plea in the trial court on September 30, 2004. Congress has removed judicial review of an order of removal of an alien who has committed an aggravated felony. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), 1252(a)(2)(C). As a result, this court does not have jurisdiction over petitioner’s appeal. Khalayleh v. INS , 287 F.3d 978, 979 (10th Cir. 2002); 8 U.S.C. §§ 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), 1252(a)(2)(C). Petitioner’s request for release on bond is denied without prejudice. That request should be raised in the district court in apetition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The motion for a stay of removal is denied, the req uest for immediate release is denied without prejudice, and the petiti on for review is DISMISSED.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT PER CURIAM
Platform Specifications

Lancaster Mk. III, Rev. 4

Aircraft overview parameters:

Type: Single Electric Motor, Fixed Wing

Power source: Lithium-Polymer Battery (3900 mAhr)

Survey altitude: 30m – 300m | 98ft – 984ft

Cruise speed: 12m/s | 27MPH | 43km/h | 23kn

Flight Time: Up to 45 minutes (dependent on environmental conditions)

Max Takeoff weight: 5.5lbs | 2.5kg

Operating temperature: 14F – 140F | -10C - 60C

Telemetry data link: 433MHz Europe or 915MHz North / South America

Emergency override control frequency: 2.4GHz

Aircraft technical parameters:

Endurance: 45 min Survey Area per flight (100m | 328ft alt, visual camera, 70% image overlap): Approximately 300 acres

Weight (no payload): 1.9kg | 4.1lb

Max Payload: 700g | 24.7oz 

Wingspan: 1.5m | 4.9ft

Length: 1.3m | 4.3ft

Operational Sound Intensity at Altitude: Approx. 40dB

Linear Flight Range: 30km (15km roundtrip) | 18.6mi (9.3mi roundtrip)

Communications range (line of site): 2km | 1.2mi

Computation: 720 MHz Dual-Core Linux CPU

Embedded Processing: 1 CPUs

Interfacing: Bluetooth, digital/analog IO, serial, USB, Wi-Fi, Ethernet, IIC

Speed (Cruise): 12-16m/s | 43.2-57.6km/h | 26.8-35.8mph 

Speed (Max): 25m/s | 90km/h | 55.9mph 

Max Wind: 12.5m/s | 45km/h | 27.9mph

Tested Temp Range: -10C to 60C | 14F to 140F 

Maximum operating altitude MSL: 13,123ft (4,000m)

System Diagnostic sample rate: 25Hz

Operational tempo:

Takeoff Distance:

Hand Launch: 0m | 0ft run, 40m | 131ft climb out (distance to 40m | 131ft alt)

Water Launch: 10m | 32.8ft run, 40m | 131ft climb out

Landing Distance:

Min Approach Distance: 200m | 656ft

Landing rollout (distance to stop from touchdown): 2m | 6.6ft (land), 3m | 9.8ft (Water), 6m | 19.7ft (snow)

Packaging:

Total packed weight (including field case): 39lbs | 17.7kg

Field case dimensions: 45” x 16” x 14” | 114.3cm x 40.6cm x 35.6cm

In the USA, aircraft shall be registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification (N-Number) markings

Ground Control Station:

The ground control station will include a single computer in communications contact with the vehicle system. This station will 

primarily act as an information conduit to the operators with little manual control as the nominal vehicle operations will be fully 

autonomous. 

A Futaba-compatible RC transmitter is used to provide remote control capabilities and manual override for the vehicle

Ground Control Station Software:

The Aircraft Ground Station Software is the PrecisionHawk Flight Planner and ArduPlane Mission Planner
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4020 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARL DAVID WHITE,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-2276-GEB-GGH-P

vs.

CA. DEPT. OF CORR., et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 23, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. 

On November 2, 2005, the court granted defendants’ May 19, 2005, motion to

dismiss with thirty days to file an amended complaint with respect to the following claims: 1)

Case 2:04-cv-02276-GEB-GGH Document 88 Filed 06/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

imposition of the R suffix caused plaintiff to suffer from increased risk to safety as to defendants

Rhodes and Jeff; 2) the claims against defendants Ceaglio and Schroers based on plaintiff’s

failure to link these defendants to the alleged deprivations. Thirty days passed and plaintiff did

not file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on January 19, 2006, the magistrate judge

recommended that these claims be dismissed. Plaintiff was granted twenty days to file objections

but failed to do so.

On February 23, 2006, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. On March 23,

2006, the magistrate judge dismissed the second amended complaint because it was untimely and

because it did not cure the pleading defects discussed in the November 2, 2005, order.

Because plaintiff did not file an amended complaint in accordance with the

November 2, 2005, order, the January 19, 2006, findings and recommendations are adopted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 23, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. The December 23, 2005, motion to dismiss filed by defendants Adams, Hough,

Moncayo and Gonzales is granted;

3. The January 19, 2006, findings and recommendations are adopted in full;

4. The remaining claims against defendants Rhodes, Jeff, Ceaglio and Schroers

are dismissed;

5. This action is dismissed.

Dated: June 6, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02276-GEB-GGH Document 88 Filed 06/07/06 Page 2 of 2
**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
   
   In
        connection with the Annual Report of Xraymedia.  on Form 10-KSB for
        the
        period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond Dabney, President and
        Chief Executive Officer of Xraymedia and a member of the Board of
        Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
   (1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
        or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
        condition and result of operations of the Company.
   
   ***/s/
        Raymond Dabney*
 Raymond
        Dabney
 Chief
        Executive Officer
   August
        25, 2005
    **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
   
   In
        connection with the Annual Report of Xraymedia on form 10-KSB for
        the
        period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond Dabney, Secretary,
        Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer Xraymedia and a member of the
        Board
        of Directors, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
   (1)
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
        or 15(d)
        of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2)
          The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial
        condition and result of operations of the Company.
   
   */s/*Raymond Dabney
 Raymond
        Dabney
 Chief
        Financial Officer
   August
        25, 2005
No. 56432.

protest 178177-K (New York).

#### Charmeur Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Iehthyolsulfonate d’Ammonium” similar in all material respects to the ammonium ichthosulfonate passed upon in *United States*v. *Kachurin Drug Company*(39 C. C. P. A. 36, C. A. D. 459), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORIE ALMAZAN and 

ESTHER GALVEZ, 

Plaintiffs,

v.

AZIZURANMAN RAHMANI,

individually and doing

business as ORANGE CAB CO.,

SAYED A. KARIMI, doing

business as ORANGE CAB CO.

and NATIONAL RAILROAD

PASSENGER CORPORATION, 

Defendants.

___________________________/

No. 2:04-cv-1872-MCE-PAN

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND

DISPOSITION

Pursuant to the representations of the attorney for

Plaintiffs, the Court has determined that this case is settled.

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160,

dispositional documents are to be filed on or before April 17,

2006.

///

///

///

///

 

Case 2:04-cv-01872-MCE -PAN Document 35 Filed 03/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Failure to comply with this Order may be grounds for the

imposition of sanctions on any and all counsel as well as any

party or parties who cause non-compliance with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 27, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01872-MCE -PAN Document 35 Filed 03/28/06 Page 2 of 2
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-507 

________________________________________________________________________ 

WEAPONS 

Proliferation 

 Agreement Between 

the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and AZERBAIJAN 

Signed at Washington September 28, 1999 

 

and 

Protocol Amending the Agreement 

Signed at Baku December 29, 2011 
 NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 AZERBAIJAN 

 

 Weapons: Proliferation 

 Agreement signed at Washington 

 September 28, 1999; 

 Entered into force May 7, 2003. 

 And protocol amending the agreement. 

 Signed at Baku December 29, 2011; 

 Entered into force May 24, 2012.