10498 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Notices 

2The PRC-wide entity for Axes/Adzes includes 

Jafsam. 

3The PRC-wide entity for Bars/Wedges includes 

SMC and Jafsam. 

4The PRC-wide entity for Hammers/Sledges 

includes SMC, Jafsam, and Huarong. 

5The PRC-wide entity for Picks/Mattocks 

includes Jafsam, TMC, and Huarong. 

Manufacturer/exporter 

(percent) 

Weighted-average 

margin 

Heavy Forged Hand Tools from the PRC: Picks/Mattocks 

PRC-Wide Rate ......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 98.77 

Case briefs from interested parties 

may be submitted not later than 30 days 

of the date of publication of this notice, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c). Rebuttal 

briefs, limited to issues raised in the 

case briefs, will be due five days later, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(d). Parties 

who submit case or rebuttal briefs in 

this proceeding are requested to submit 

with each argument (1) a statement of 

the issue and (2) a brief summary of the 

argument not to exceed five pages. 

Parties are also encouraged to provide a 

table of statutes, regulations, and cases 

cited, and a diskette containing the 

electronic version. 

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice. Interested parties who wish 

to request a hearing or to participate if 

one is requested, must submit a written 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration within 30 days 

of the date of publication of this notice. 

Requests should contain: (1) The party’s 

name, address, and telephone number; 

(2) the number of participants; and (3) 

a list of issues to be discussed. See 19 

CFR 351.310(c). Issues raised in the 

hearing will be limited to those raised 

in the briefs. Any hearing will normally 

be held 37 days after the publication of 

this notice, or the first business day 

thereafter, unless the Department alters 

the date per 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

The Department will issue the final 

results of these reviews, including the 

results of its analysis of issues raised in 

any such written briefs or at the hearing, 

if held, not later than 120 days after the 

date of publication of this notice. 

Assessment Rates 

The Department shall determine, and 

CBP shall assess, antidumping duties on 

all appropriate entries. The Department 

intends to issue appropriate 

appraisement instructions for the 

companies subject to these reviews 

directly to CBP within 15 days of 

publication of the final results of these 

reviews. However, the final results of 

this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of these reviews and for 

future deposits of estimated duties, 

where applicable. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of these 

reviews for all shipments of the subject 

merchandise entered, or withdrawn 

from warehouse, for consumption on or 

after the publication date, as provided 

for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) 

For the exporters listed above, the cash 

deposit rate will be that established in 

the final results of this review (except, 

if the rate is zero or de minimis, no cash 

deposit will be required); (2) for 

previously investigated or reviewed PRC 

and non-PRC exporters not listed above 

that have separate rates, the cash 

deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed review; (3) for 

all PRC exporters of subject 

merchandise which have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be the PRCwide rate for each class or kind of 

merchandise as follows: (a) Axes/Adzes, 

189.37 percent; (b) Hammers/Sledges, 

45.42 percent; (c) Picks/Mattocks, 98.77 

percent; and (d) Bars/Wedges, 139.31 

percent; and (4) for all non-PRC 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own rate, the 

cash deposit rate will be the rate 

applicable to the PRC exporters that 

supplied that non-PRC exporter. These 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a preliminary 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

These administrative reviews and 

notice are in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1), 751(a)(2)(B), and 777(i) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213 and 351.214. 

Dated: February 28, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–4166 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–857, A–201–828] 

Certain Welded Large Diameter Line 

Pipe from Japan and Mexico; Notice of 

Final Results of Five-year (‘‘Sunset’’) 

Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 1, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) initiated the first sunset 

reviews of the antidumping duty orders 

on certain welded large diameter line 

pipe (‘‘welded large diameter pipe’’) 

from Japan and Mexico, pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended, (‘‘the Act’’). On the basis of 

notices of intent to participate and 

adequate substantive responses filed on 

behalf of the domestic interested parties 

and no response from respondent 

interested parties, the Department has 

conducted expedited sunset reviews of 

these antidumping duty orders. As a 

result of these sunset reviews, the 

Department finds that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the level indicated in the 

‘‘Final Results of Reviews’’ section of 

this notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 8, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dena Crossland or Dana Mermelstein, 

AD/CVD Operations, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC, 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–3362 or (202) 482–

1391, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Notices 10499 

Background 

On November 1, 2006, the Department 

initiated the first sunset reviews of the 

antidumping duty orders on welded 

large diameter pipe from Japan and 

Mexico, pursuant to section 751(c) of 

the Act. See Initiation of Five-year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 71 FR 64242 

(November 1, 2006). The Department 

received a Notice of Intent to Participate 

from American Steel Pipe Division of 

ACIPCO, Berg Steel Pipe Corporation, 

Dura–Bond Pipe LLC, Oregon Steel 

Mills, and Stupp Corp. (collectively 

‘‘domestic interested parties’’), within 

the deadline specified in section 

351.218(d)(1)(i) of the Department’s 

regulations. Domestic interested parties 

claimed interested party status under 

section 771(9)(C) of the Act as U.S. 

producers of the subject merchandise. 

We received complete substantive 

responses to the notice of initiation from 

the domestic interested parties within 

the 30-day deadline specified in section 

351.218(d)(3)(i) of the Department’s 

regulations. We received no responses 

from the respondent interested parties 

to these proceedings. As a result, 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the 

Act and section 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of 

the Department’s regulations, the 

Department conducted expedited sunset 

reviews of these orders. 

Scope of the Orders 

Japan 

The product covered by this 

antidumping order is certain welded 

carbon and alloy line pipe, of circular 

cross section and with an outside 

diameter greater than 16 inches, but less 

than 64 inches, in diameter, whether or 

not stencilled. This product is normally 

produced according to American 

Petroleum Institute (‘‘API’’) 

specifications, including Grades A25, A, 

B, and X grades ranging from X42 to 

X80, but can also be produced to other 

specifications. Specifically not included 

within the scope of this investigation is 

American Water Works Association 

(‘‘AWWA’’) specification water and 

sewage pipe and the following size/ 

grade combinations; of line pipe: 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 18 inches and less than 

or equal to 22 inches, with a wall 

thickness measuring 0.750 inch or 

greater, regardless of grade. 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 24 inches and less than 

30 inches, with wall thickness 

measuring greater than 0.875 inches in 

grades A, B, and X42, with wall 

thickness measuring greater than 0.750 

inches in grades X52 through X56, and 

with wall thickness measuring greater 

than 0.688 inches in grades X60 or 

greater. 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 30 inches and less than 

36 inches, with wall thickness 

measuring greater than 1.250 inches in 

grades A, B, and X42, with wall 

thickness measuring greater than 1.000 

inches in grades X52 through X56, and 

with wall thickness measuring greater 

than 0.875 inches in grades X60 or 

greater. 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 36 inches and less than 

42 inches, with wall thickness 

measuring greater than 1.375 inches in 

grades A, B, and X42, with wall 

thickness measuring greater than 1.250 

inches in grades X52 through X56, and 

with wall thickness measuring greater 

than 1.125 inches in grades X60 or 

greater. 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 42 inches and less than 

64 inches, with a wall thickness 

measuring greater than 1.500 inches in 

grades A, B, and X42, with wall 

thickness measuring greater than 1.375 

inches in grades X52 through X56, and 

with wall thickness measuring greater 

than 1.250 inches in grades X60 or 

greater. 

-Having an outside diameter equal to 

48 inches, with a wall thickness 

measuring 1.0 inch or greater, in grades 

X–80 or greater. 

-Having an outside diameter of 48 

inches to and including 52 inches, and 

with a wall thickness of 0.90 inch or 

more in grade X–80. 

-Having an outsides diameter of 48 

inches to and including 52 inches, and 

with a wall thickness of 0.54 inch or 

more in grade X100. 

Scope Clarification: On October 26, 

2006, the Department determined that 

large diameter line pipe with an API 

grade X–80 having an outside diameter 

of 21 inches and wall thickness of 0.625 

inches was excluded from the scope of 

the antidumping duty order on welded 

large diameter pipe from Japan. See 

Final Results of Changed Circumstances 

Review: Certain Welded Large Diameter 

Line Pipe from Japan, 71 FR 62584 

(October 26, 2006). 

The product currently is classified 

under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) item numbers 

7305.11.10.30, 7305.11.10.60, 

7305.11.50.00, 7305.12.10.30, 

7305.12.10.60, 7305.12.50.00, 

7305.19.10.30. 7305.19.10.60, and 

7305.19.50.00. Although the HTSUS 

item numbers are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope is 

dispositive. 

Mexico 

The product covered by this order is 

certain welded carbon and alloy line 

pipe, of circular cross section and with 

an outside diameter greater than 16 

inches, but less than 64 inches, in 

diameter, whether or not stenciled. This 

product is normally produced according 

to American Petroleum Institute (‘‘API’’) 

specifications, including Grades A25, A, 

B, and X grades ranging from X42 to 

X80, but can also be produced to other 

specifications. Specifically not included 

within the scope of this investigation is 

American Water Works Association 

(‘‘AWWA’’) specification water and 

sewage pipe, and the following size/ 

grade combinations of line pipe: 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 18 inches and less than 

or equal to 22 inches, with a wall 

thickness measuring 0.750 inch or 

greater, regardless of grade. 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 24 inches and less than 

30 inches, with wall thickness 

measuring greater than 0.875 inches in 

grades A, B, and X42, with wall 

thickness measuring greater than 0.750 

inches in grades X52 through X56, and 

with wall thickness measuring greater 

than 0.688 inches in grades X60 or 

greater. 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 30 inches and less than 

36 inches, with wall thickness 

measuring greater than 1.250 inches in 

grades A, B, and X42, with wall 

thickness measuring greater than 1.000 

inches in grades X52 through X56, and 

with wall thickness measuring greater 

than 0.875 inches in grades X60 or 

greater. 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 36 inches and less than 

42 inches, with wall thickness 

measuring greater than 1.375 inches in 

grades A, B, and X42, with wall 

thickness measuring greater than 1.250 

inches in grades X52 through X56, and 

with wall thickness measuring greater 

than 1.125 inches in grades X60 or 

greater. 

-Having an outside diameter greater 

than or equal to 42 inches and less than 

64 inches, with a wall thickness 

measuring greater than 1.500 inches in 

grades A, B, and X42, with wall 

thickness measuring greater than 1.375 

inches in grades X52 through X56, and 

with wall thickness measuring greater 

than 1.250 inches in grades X60 or 

greater. 

-Having an outside diameter equal to 

48 inches, with a wall thickness 

measuring 1.0 inch or greater, in grades 

X–80 or greater. 

The product currently is classified 

under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
10500 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 45 / Thursday, March 8, 2007 / Notices 

(‘‘HTSUS’’) item numbers 

7305.11.10.30, 7305.11.10.60, 

7305.11.50.00, 7305.12.10.30, 

7305.12.10.60, 7305.12.50.00, 

7305.19.10.30, 7305.19.10.60, and 

7305.19.50.00. Although the HTSUS 

item numbers are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in these cases are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of 

Expedited Sunset Reviews of the 

Antidumping Duty Orders on Certain 

Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe from 

Japan and Mexico, from Stephen Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, to David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated March 1, 2007 

(‘‘Decision Memo’’), which is hereby 

adopted by this notice. The issues 

discussed in the Decision Memo include 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of dumping and the 

magnitude of the margins likely to 

prevail if the orders were revoked. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in these sunset 

reviews and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public memo, 

which is on file in room B–099 of the 

main Commerce Building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memo can be accessed directly 

on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/ 

index.html, under the heading ‘‘March 

2007.’’ The paper copy and electronic 

version of the Decision Memo are 

identical in content. 

Final Results of Reviews 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on welded 

large diameter pipe from Japan and 

Mexico would likely lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the following weighted–average 

percentage margins: 

Manufacturers/Exporters/Producers Weighted–Average 

Margin (Percent) 

Japan.

Nippon Steel Corporation ............................ 30.80 

Kawasaki Steel Corporation ..................... 30.80 

All Others ...................... 30.80 

Mexico.

PMT–Tubacero ............. 49.86 

All Others ...................... 49.86 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders 

(‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility 

concerning the return or destruction of 

proprietary information disclosed under 

APO in accordance with section 351.305 

of the Department’s regulations. Timely 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: March 1, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–4164 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

Export Trade Certificate of Review 

ACTION: Notice of Application to Amend 

an Export Trade Certificate of Review. 

SUMMARY: Export Trading Company 

Affairs (‘‘ETCA’’), International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, has received an application 

to amend an Export Trade Certificate of 

Review (‘‘Certificate’’). This notice 

summarizes the proposed amendment 

and requests comments relevant to 

whether the Certificate should be 

issued. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jeffrey Anspacher, Director, Export 

Trading Company Affairs, International 

Trade Administration, (202) 482–5131 

(this is not a toll-free number) or E-mail 

at oetca@ita.doc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title III of 

the Export Trading Company Act of 

1982 (15 U.S.C. 4001–21) authorizes the 

Secretary of Commerce to issue Export 

Trade Certificates of Review. An Export 

Trade Certificate of Review protects the 

holder and the members identified in 

the Certificate from state and federal 

government antitrust actions and from 

private treble damage antitrust actions 

for the export conduct specified in the 

Certificate and carried out in 

compliance with its terms and 

conditions. Section 302(b)(1) of the 

Export Trading Company Act of 1982 

and 15 CFR 325.6(a) require the 

Secretary to publish a notice in the 

Federal Register identifying the 

applicant and summarizing its proposed 

export conduct. 

Request for Public Comments 

Interested parties may submit written 

comments relevant to the determination 

whether an amended Certificate should 

be issued. If the comments include any 

privileged or confidential business 

information, it must be clearly marked 

and a nonconfidential version of the 

comments (identified as such) should be 

included. Any comments not marked 

privileged or confidential business 

information will be deemed to be 

nonconfidential. An original and five (5) 

copies, plus two (2) copies of the 

nonconfidential version, should be 

submitted no later than 20 days after the 

date of this notice to: Export Trading 

Company Affairs, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, Room 7021–B H, 

Washington, DC 20230. Information 

submitted by any person is exempt from 

disclosure under the Freedom of 

Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). 

However, nonconfidential versions of 

the comments will be made available to 

the applicant if necessary for 

determining whether or not to issue the 

Certificate. Comments should refer to 

this application as ‘‘Export Trade 

Certificate of Review, application 

number 06–A0002.’’

A summary of the application for an 

amendment follows. 

Summary of the Application 

Applicant: Necole Shannon Global, 

Inc. (‘‘NSG’’), 7126 E. King Place, Tulsa, 

Oklahoma 74115. 

Contact: Darah Thomas, President, 

Telephone: (918) 834–6277. 

Application No.: 06–A0002. 

Date Deemed Submitted: February 27, 

2007. 

The original NSG Certificate was 

issued on December 14, 2006 (71 FR 

76275, December 20, 2006). 

Proposed Amendment: NSG seeks to 

amend its Certificate to change its name 

from ‘‘Darah Thomas, doing business as 

Necole Shannon Global Export 

Services’’ to the new listing ‘‘Necole 

Shannon Global, Inc.’’

Dated: March 2, 2007. 

Jeffrey C. Anspacher, 

Director, Export Trading Company Affairs. 

[FR Doc. E7–4148 Filed 3–7–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES