alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORT JAMES
CORPORATION DECEMBER 26, 1999 FORM 10-K FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<CIK> 0000053117
<NAME> FORT JAMES CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                             10
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     881
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                       790
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,828
<PP&E>                                          7,858
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  7,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,270
<BONDS>                                         3,432
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           21
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,106
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    7,258
<SALES>                                         6,827
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                6,827
<CGS>                                         (4,725)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 (6,112)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   28
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (239)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   504
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (155)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               350
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (6)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   195
<CHANGES>                                        (22)
<NET-INCOME>                                      517
<EPS-BASIC>                                    2.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    2.35



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIM ISAAC,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1707 KJM

vs.

MORGAN STANLEY DW, INC., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

A status conference was held in this matter on April 27, 2005 before the

undersigned. William Torngren appeared for plaintiff. Kenneth Mennemeier appeared for

defendant Morgan Stanley. No appearance was made for third party defendant Isaac, proceeding

in propria persona. Upon consideration of the status report on file in this action, discussion of

counsel and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The parties shall proceed with discovery as described in the plan set forth in

Part 7(b) of the joint status report filed April 20, 2005.

2. A further joint status report shall be filed no later than May 31, 2005 advising

the court of the status of the case. If the parties have determined by May 31st that mediation or

further settlement discussions are appropriate at this time, the joint status report shall propose a

period of time for completion of such discussions. If the parties have determined that mediation

Case 2:04-cv-01707-KJM Document 27 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

or further settlement discussions are not appropriate at this time, the joint status report shall

propose dates for litigation of this matter, as required by Local Rule 16-240(a)(9).

DATED: April 28, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

isaac.oas

Case 2:04-cv-01707-KJM Document 27 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 2
----

----

|   | 1. | In article 55.4(a1)(6) after the words "within seven (7) working days from the said date";" shall come" Notwithstanding, a subscriber who is not a new subscriber, that does not use the services set forth in section 3 of the form as of November 1, 2011 and did not relay his response to the licensee with respect to the form by December 1, 2011, the licensee may block the subscriber from receiving the said services as of December 1, 2011;" |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The commencement of this amendment in on the date of its signature. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (sgd)                                   |                                        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Haim Giron Senior Deputy Engineering& Licensing                                                                                                                                                          | Eden Bar TalDirector General                                                                                                                                                                                                         |

----

----
### APPENDIX 5A. AHAM DATA SUBMITTAL

TABLE OF CONTENTS

5A.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 5A-1 5A.2 AHAM COMMERCIAL CLOTHES WASH ER DATA SUBMITTAL ............... 5A-1

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 5A.2.1 AHAM Commercial Clothes Washer Shipments, Average Energy and Water Use, and Incremental Cost Data Submittal ...................................... 5A-2

5A-i

### APPENDIX 5A. AHAM DATA SUBMITTAL

5A.1 INTRODUCTION This appendix presents the shipments and incremental cost data submitted to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by the Associatio n of Home Appliance Manufacturers (AHAM) in support of the engineering analysis for this rulemaking. Information was provided for commercial clothes washers (CCWs) in response to data request sheets generated by DOE and provided to AHAM. See chapter 5 of the techni cal support document (TSD) for details of the engineering analysis for wh ich these data were used.

5A.2 AHAM COMMERCIAL CLOTHES WASHER DATA SUBMITTAL AHAM supplied shipments, average energy and water use, and increm ental cost data to DOE, representing the aggregated inputs from manufacturers which produce the significant majority of CCWs.
Figure 5A.2.1 reproduces the tables of CCW data submitted to DOE by AHAM. The first table, designated Part I in AHAM's submittal, contains the annual shipments data along with the shipment-weighted average modified energy factor (MEF) and water factor (WF) from 2002 to 2005.
Part II provides average energy and water us e for a baseline CCW w ith an MEF of 1.26. Part III contains shipment-w eighted incremental costs for two efficiency levels: MEF=1.42/WF=9.5 and MEF=2.0/WF=5.5. Data were not provided at other efficiency levels due to confidentiality concerns.

5A-1

### Figure 5A.2.1 AHAM Commercial Clothes Washer Shipments, Average Energy and Water Use, and Incremental Cost Data Submittal


### Commercial Clothes Washers (CCW)

Part I: Annual Shipments & Shipment-Weighted MEF and WF - Vertical and Horizontal Axis Combined

YEAR TOTAL SHIPMENTS MEF WF
2002 175,187 1.30 11.77 2003 190,720 1.33 11.42 2004 178,382 1.33 11.33 2005 177,394 1.41 10.91

Part II: Average Energy and Water Use for Vertical Axis CCW with MEF of 1.26

MEF TYPE Average WF Average cu.ft Average Hot Water kWh/cycle Average Machine kWh/cycle Average Dr y er kWh/cycle Average Standb y W Average Water use gallons/cycle
1.26 V 11.1 3.1 0.87 0.18 1.38 * 34.3

* insufficient data reported
Part III: Aggregated Shipment-Weighted Incremental Cost to go from current 1.26 MEF standard to levels indicated below

MEF: 1.42 1.6 1.72 1.8 2 2.2 Water Factor: 9.5 8.5 8 7.5 5.5 5.1 Shipment-Weighted

Incremental Cost: $74.63 * * * $316.35 *

* insufficient data reported

5A-2
No. 48524.

#### Protest 812182-G of Baker, Carver & Morrell Ship Supplies (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the merchandise consisted of 14 drums containing boiler compound; that tags bearing the word “Norway” were attached by wire to the caps of the drum; and that the importer was required to stencil the words “Product of Norway” on the drums before they were released. The plaintiff cited Abstract 42581 and *Greene*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 97, C. D. 296), in which cases the marking was placed on paper tags and attached in such manner that it would not be removed when the containers were opened. .'The court stated that the cap of a drum is a part of the drum and quite different from a string closing the mouth of a bag, that it would not be removed from a drum containing liquid, and, even if it were removed to examine the liquid it would necessarily be replaced on the drum to protect the contents; and that such merchandise as that involved herein usually goes to the consumer in the original drum as imported. On the record it was held that the merchandise was legally marked. *United States*v. *Monteverde & Parodi*(26 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 21 distinguished.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WAYMAN STRICKLAND,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2334 KJM

vs.

CITY OF STOCKTON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Calendared for hearing on June 28, 2006 is defendants’ motion for summary

judgment. Plaintiff has filed a statement of no opposition to the motion. It is not clear from

plaintiff’s statement whether he intends dismissal of the entire action or whether he intends to

pursue this action against the non-moving defendants, who have yet to appear.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Hearing on defendant’s motion for summary judgment is vacated.

2. Within ten days from the date this order is filed, plaintiff shall file a statement

indicating whether dismissal should be entered on the entire action.

DATED: June 16, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006 strickland.dis

Case 2:04-cv-02334-KJM Document 17 Filed 06/16/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32(a)

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

         I, Joseph P. Keithley, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Keithley Instruments, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

         (1) The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended
         September 30, 2003 which this certification accompanies fully complies
         with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
         Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Joseph P. Keithley
-------------------------------------------
Joseph P. Keithley
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
December 17, 2003

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Keithley
Instruments, Inc. and will be retained by Keithley Instruments, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 52311.

protests 972085-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Wing Hop Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342) at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 as oranges; (2) bak hop, lily bulbs (bak hop), lo hon qua, lotus nuts, sar sum, wai san kwok, wai san (stick), and yuk ehok the same as the merchandise passed upon in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust Ct. 70, C. D. 372) were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs; (3) sar sum pen, wai san pen, and yuk juk (tsuk) pen similar to the merchandise involved in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States, supra,*at 10 percent ad valorem under paragraph 34 as drugs, advanced; and (4) fish in lard with beans similar to that the subject of Abstract 42516 at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as nonenumerated manufactured articles.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK VALENZUELA, JR., No. CIV S-04-0460 MCE JFM P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

SCOTT KERNAN, WARDEN, ET AL., 

Respondents. 

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely

filed a notice of appeal of this court’s September 7, 2005

dismissal of his application for a writ of habeas corpus as

barred by the statute of limitations. Before petitioner can

appeal this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253 “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

///

Case 2:04-cv-00460-MCE -JFM Document 14 Filed 10/17/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court must either issue a certificate of appealability

indicating which issues satisfy the required showing or must

state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. Fed.

R. App. P. 22(b).

Where, as here, the petition was dismissed on procedural

grounds, a certificate of appealability “should issue if the

prisoner can show: (1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it

debatable whether the district court was correct in its

procedural ruling’; and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would find it

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial

of a constitutional right.’” Morris v. Woodford, 229 F.3d 775,

780 (9th Cir. 2000) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 120

S.Ct. 1595, 1604 (2000)).

After careful review of the entire record herein, this court

finds that petitioner has not satisfied the first requirement for

issuance of a certificate of appealability in this case.

Specifically, there is no showing that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether this action is barred by the statute of

limitations. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should

not issue in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 14, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00460-MCE -JFM Document 14 Filed 10/17/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Case 2:04-cv-00460-MCE -JFM Document 14 Filed 10/17/05 Page 3 of 3
No. 66829.

#### Baron Tube Company and W. R. Zanes & Company *v.*United States,

protests 261953-K, etc. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of seamless steel oil-well casings, not advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Supply & Mfg. Co., The Crispin Company*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 1804), the claim at one-tenth of 1 cent per pound was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of seamless steel oil-well casings, advanced beyond hammering, rolling, or casting, the same as those involved in *Humble Oil & Refining Co. et al.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 32, C.D. 1577), were held dutiable at 7% percent ad valorem, as claimed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4530 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4530

 To authorize an exception to the restriction on construction of Coast 
    Guard vessels in foreign shipyards for certain construction in 
  shipyards in North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2024

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize an exception to the restriction on construction of Coast 
    Guard vessels in foreign shipyards for certain construction in 
  shipyards in North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Coast Guard Readiness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTION ON CONSTRUCTION OF COAST GUARD VESSELS 
              IN FOREIGN SHIPYARDS FOR CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION IN 
              SHIPYARDS IN NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION MEMBER 
              COUNTRIES.

    (a) In General.--Section 1151 of title 14, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``subsection (b)'' and 
        inserting ``subsections (b) and (c)''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(c)(1) Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to 
construction otherwise covered by that subsection if--
            ``(A) the foreign shipyard concerned is located in--
                    ``(i) a North Atlantic Treaty Organization member 
                country; or
                    ``(ii) a country in the Indo-Pacific region that is 
                party to a mutual defense treaty with United States; 
                and
            ``(B) the cost of the construction concerned is less than 
        the cost would be if such construction occurred in a domestic 
        shipyard.
    ``(2) Before the construction of a Coast Guard vessel, or a major 
component of the hull or superstructure of a Coast Guard vessel, may 
commence at a foreign shipyard under this subsection, the Commandant 
shall submit to Congress a certification that the foreign shipyard is 
not owned or operated by a Chinese company or a multinational company 
domiciled in the People's Republic of China.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 8679(a) of title 10, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting ``and section 1151(c) of title 
14'' after ``in subsection (b)''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.6


 


October 7, 2016


 


AR Capital Acquisition Corp.


405 Park Avenue, 14th Floor


New York, New York 10022


Facsimile: (212) 421-4799


 


Re: Dividend Waiver Letter


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


In connection with
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by that certain Agreement dated as of September 16, 2016 (as amended, the “Agreement”,
capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement), by and among AR
Capital Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), Axar Master Fund Ltd., a Cayman Islands
exempted company (“Axar”), and AR Capital, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“AR
Capital”), each of Axar and the undersigned independent directors of the Company hereby waives with respect to their
respective Founder Shares to be held following the Closing, any right to receive the Warrant Dividends. Axar further waives, with
respect to the Founder Warrants to be held by it following the Closing, any rights or adjustments under the Warrant Agreement in
respect of the Warrant Dividends.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Dr. Robert J. Froehlich
	 	 	Dr. Robert J. Froehlich
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ David Gong
	 	 	David Gong
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ P. Sue Perrotty
	 	 	P. Sue Perrotty
	 	 	 
	 	AXAR MASTER FUND LTD.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Andrew Axelrod
	 	 	Name: Andrew Axelrod
	 	 	Title: Director


 


[Signature Page to Dividend Waiver]


 




     


     


    

 


	ACKNOWLEDGED BY: 	 
	 	 
	AR CAPITAL ACQUISITION CORP.	 
	 	 
	By:	 /s/ William Kahane	 
	 	Name: William Kahane	 
	 	Title: CEO	 


 


[Signature Page to Dividend Waiver]
23.02
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Region II Regulatory Fairness Board and the SBA Office of the National Ombudsman will hold a public hearing on Friday, January 26, 2007, at 10 a.m. The meeting will take place at Madison Square Garden—Theater Entrance, 7th Avenue between W 32nd and W 33rd Streets, New York, NY 10001. The purpose of the meeting is to receive comments and testimony from small business owners, small government entities, and small non-profit organizations concerning regulatory enforcement and compliance actions taken by Federal agencies. 

                    Anyone wishing to attend or to make a presentation must contact Herbert Austin, in writing or by fax, in order to be placed on the agenda. Herbert Austin, Deputy District Director, SBA, New York District Office, 26 Federal Plaza, Suite 3100, New York, NY 10278, phone (212) 264-1482 and fax (202) 401-2224, e-mail:                     *Herbert.austin@sba.gov.*

                    For more information, see our Web site at                     *http://www.sba.gov/​ombudsman.*

Matthew Teague, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-400 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P