N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. ALEJANDR

A OC HOA-NAVAR

RETE, a .k.a . M onic a Gonz a le s, a .k.a . Anna Gonz a le z , a .k.a . M o nic a G o nz a le z , a .k.a . Ale ja n dra Oc hoa Nava re tte , a .k.a . Ale ja n dra Oc hoa , a .k.a . Anna Oc hoa , a .k.a . M aria De Je s us Oc hoa , De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 13-50401

D.C . No. 2:12-c r-01068-SVW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Ste phe n V. W ilson, District Judge , Pre s iding Subm itte d De c e m

be r 9, 2014 ** B e fore : WALLAC E, LEAVY, a nd B YB EE, C i rc uit Judge s . Ale ja ndra Oc hoa -Nava

rre te a ppe a l s from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd 

# FIL ED D EC 16 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U
. S
. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).c ha lle nge s the 46-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following her guilty -ple a c onvic tion for ille g a l re e ntry

a fte r de porta

tion, in viola

tion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. W e have jurisdic tion under 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm , but re m and to c o rre c t the judgm e nt. Oc hoa -Nava

rre te c o nte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt viola

te d Fe de ra l R

ule of C rim ina l Proc e dure 32 by fa iling to rule

on he r obje c tion to the pre s e nte nc e re port (“ PSR ” ). The distric t

c ourt did not viola

te R ule 32 be c a

use Oc h oa -Nava

rre te ’ s obje c tion to the

PSR c onc e rne d a

le ga l issue , not a

fa c tua l dispute . Se eUnite d State s v . Graje da , 581 F.3d 1186, 1188-89 (9th C ir. 2009). Oc hoa -Nava

rre te a l so c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt proc e dura lly e rre d by fa iling to re spond to her re que st for a c ultura l a ssim ila

tion depa rture , an d by

fa iling to unde rsta

nd a nd a d dre s s he r m itiga

ting a rgum e nt re g arding there duc e d ne e d for de te rre nc e in vie w of he r e ligibility for a U-visa . W e re vie w for pla in e rror, se e Unite d State s v . Vale nc ia-Barragan , 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th C ir. 2010), a nd find no e rror. The re c ord re fle c ts tha t the distric t c ourt c onside re d Oc hoa -Nava rre te ’ s c ultura l a ssim ila

tion depa rture re que st, prope rly unde rstood a n d c onside re d he r U-visa argum e nt, a

nd suffic ie ntly

e xpla ine d the be low-Guide line s se nte nc e . Se e Rita v . Unite d State

s , 551 U.S. 338, 358-59 (2007). In a c c orda

nc e with Unite d State

s v . Riv e ra-Sanc he

z , 222 F.3d 1057, 1062
1 3 - 5 0 4 0 1 2(9th C ir. 2000), were m and the c a se to thedistric t c ourt with instructions tha t it de le te from

the judgm e nt the re fe re nc e to se c t ion 1326(b)(2). Se eUnite d State s v . He rre ra-Blanc o , 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th C ir. 2000) (re m anding sua sponteto de le te the re fe re n c e to se c tion 1326(b)(2)). AFFIRM E D; RE M ANDE D to c or r e c t the judgm e nt.

1 3 - 5 0 4 0 1 3