alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1. 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




Date:
                November 8, 2006
            By:
            */s/
              Jay P. Nash*Name:
                        Jay P. Nash
                        Title:
                          Chief Financial
                          Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8367]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3190]



[[Page 8367]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-34-000]


Entergy Gulf States, Inc.; Notice of Petition for Declaratory 
Order

February 15, 2007.

    Take notice that on January 24, 2007, Entergy Gulf States, Inc. 
(EGSI) submitted a petition requesting that the Commission issue a 
declaratory order finding that the payment of one or more dividends out 
of paid-in capital by EGSI to its parent, Entergy Corporation, under 
the facts and circumstances described in the petition, will not violate 
Section 305(a) of the Federal Power Act.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#561013041519383a3f383305232626392422163033243578313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e3a5a6b1a0ac8d8f8a8d86b09693938c9197a385869180cd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 2, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3190 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Curative Health Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul F.
McConnell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Paul F. McConnell
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Paul F. McConnell
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            August 9, 2005
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 4

- 0307

_____________________________
D EARLYN L OJARES , Appellant,

v.

A LFONSO S ILVA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County

. Robert K. Groeb
, Judge

. July 25, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , R AY , and N ORDBY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Cynthia Stump Swanson, Swanson Law Center, P.A., Gainesville
, for Appellant.

Sabina Tomshinsky, Home Town Law, P.A., Gainesville, for Appellee.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the December
31, 1995 Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-K and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                            2180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    81553
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3340
<INVENTORY>                                     158330
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                250678
<PP&E>                                          252203
<DEPRECIATION>                                  155546
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  376409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            69293
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         69674
<OTHER-SE>                                      166815
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    376409
<SALES>                                         461448
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                461448
<CGS>                                           300842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   300842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1347
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5032
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  40204
<INCOME-TAX>                                     14553
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              25651
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     25651
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .94


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4489 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4489

To designate the Federal building located at 50 United Nations Plaza in 
 San Francisco, California, as the ``Senator Dianne Feinstein Federal 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2024

Mr. Padilla (for himself and Ms. Butler) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the Federal building located at 50 United Nations Plaza in 
 San Francisco, California, as the ``Senator Dianne Feinstein Federal 
                  Building'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN FEDERAL BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The Federal building located at 50 United Nations 
Plaza in San Francisco, California, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Senator Dianne Feinstein Federal Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal building 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Senator Dianne Feinstein Federal Building''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Gordon F. DuGanGordon F. DuGanChief Executive Officer
No. 44015.

#### Protests 803898-G/10544, etc., of M. M. DuPouey et al. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Kinchelob, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTINA MARTINEZ and FERNANDO GALVAN,

Petitioners,

v.

L. A 360 INVESTMENT LLC; AUDREY DEWEY, individually

and as personal representative of the Estate of 

Ray Dewey, deceased,

Respondents.

No. 2D23-420

September 1, 2023

Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Pasco County; 

Susan G. Barthle, Judge. 

Brent Buckman, Port St. Lucie, for Petitioners.

Chelsea Waller-Douthard, of Waller Law, Dade City, for Respondent 

Audrey Dewey, 

No appearance for Respondent L. A 360 Investment LLC.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed.

CASANUEVA, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128409 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128409 

 COA: 260383 

JAMES E. CORBETT,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Wayne CC: 76-636725

93-500022 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2005 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s 

motion for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

s1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
Blueprint





 







 Exhibit 10.3



 


AMENDMENT
TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This
amendment (the Amendment) is executed to clarify certain provisions
of that employment agreement entered into by and between NMI
Health, Inc. and Michael J. Marx (the Parties) dated January 1,
2015 (the Employment Agreement). The term of the Employment
Agreement is stated in Paragraph 2a as two years, subject to
renewal only upon mutual agreement of the Parties. However,
Paragraph 3a of the Employment Agreement contains one sentence
referencing a potential bonus award for completion of three full
years of employment.


 


The
Parties hereby agree that there was no intention to commit to or
guarantee any offer of employment, salary or bonus beyond the
original two- year term. In order to eliminate any question
regarding the above, Paragraph 3a is hereby amended to remove all
reference to a potential third year, to read in full as
follows:


 


3a. The
Company will pay Michael Marx an annual base salary of $100,000 in
26 equal bi-weekly installments.  Such salary will be reviewed
at least annually by the President and the board of directors with
performance reviews every six months. Upon execution of this
agreement, Michael Marx shall receive a signing bonus of 225,000
shares of the Company’s restricted common stock.  At the
end of one full year of employment, the Company shall issue Michael
Marx 750,000 shares of restricted common stock. At the end of two
full years of employment, the Company shall issue Michael Marx
another 850,000 shares of restricted common stock. Additional bonus
compensation may be awarded from time to time, at the
Company’s sole discretion, in the form of Company
stock.


 


All
other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain as
written.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Michael Marx has executed this
Amendment on this 30 day of September 2016.


 


NMI
Health,
Inc.                                                                                    
Michael Marx


 


 



/s/ 
Edward J Suydam
                                                
                 
          
/s/ Michael
Marx


Edward
J Suydam, President
and                                                           
Michael Marx, Chief Financial Officer


Chief
Executive Officer
No. 59000.

protest 229076-K (New York).

#### Mercantile Metal & Ore Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that 3 cases out of 200 cases of ferrotung-sten reported by the inspector as manifested but not found were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as was reported by the inspector as manifested but not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
(Reap. Dec. 10411)

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 651, etc.

(Decided December 27, 1962)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (Allerton JeO. Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Qnilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(James F. O’Hara,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

*351KichakdsoN, Judge:

The involved merchandise consists of woven fabrics of wool, which were exported from Scotland and England and entered at Cincinnati, Ohio. The merchandise is covered by nine reappraisement appeals, which were consolidated for trial. These appeals were submitted for decision upon a stipulation reading as follows:

> Mb. Tompkins: I oilier to stipulate that the merchandise on the invoices before the court consists of woven fabrics of wool imported from Scotland during the period from January 1961 through August 1961, and not on the final list, T.D. 54521.

> I further offer to stipulate that on the dates of exportation the export values, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, were the invoiced unit prices less 3% percent, plus the cases or packing as invoiced, prorated.

> Me. O’Haea: I have discussed these cases with Deputy Appraiser Jedlicka and with his concurrence we so stipulated.

On the agreed facts, I find that export value, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1401a(b) (section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeals, enumerated in the attached schedule, and that such values are the invoice unit prices, less 3% per centum, plus the cases or packing, as invoiced, prorated.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 46710.

#### Protest 69707-K of Lanz of Salzburg (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the wool hats in question are similar in all material respects to the finished hats the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). In accordance therewith the claim at 50 cents per pound and 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1115(a) was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARCHIE R. BYRD,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2027 LKK DAD P

vs.

FRESNO COUNTY COURT,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 5, 2004, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02027-LKK -DAD Document 6 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 5, 2004, are adopted in full;

and 

2. The petition is denied for failure to exhaust state remedies.

DATED: August 2, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02027-LKK -DAD Document 6 Filed 08/02/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4731 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4731

  To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to provide for food-based 
                             interventions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2024

 Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to provide for food-based 
                             interventions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Disease Intervention through 
Nutrition Education Act'' or the ``DINE Act''.

SEC. 2. FOOD-BASED INTERVENTIONS.

    (a) Definition of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion 
Services.--Section 102(14) of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 
U.S.C. 3002(14)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by inserting ``screening for 
        eligibility for Federal and non-Federal (including community-
        based) food is medicine programs and'' before ``routine'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ``, including 
        referrals to Federal and non-Federal (including community-
        based) food is medicine programs, if appropriate'' after 
        ``caregivers''; and
            (3) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ``(including from 
        medically tailored meals and produce prescriptions)'' after 
        ``improved nutrition''.
    (b) Administration of Nutrition Services.--Section 205(a)(2)(A) of 
the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3016(a)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (vi), by inserting ``, including the use of 
        innovative approaches, including food-based interventions, such 
        as produce prescriptions'' after ``systems''; and
            (2) in clause (viii), by inserting ``and innovative 
        approaches, including intervention programs, such as produce 
        prescriptions,'' after ``including strategies''.
    (c) Nutrition Education.--Section 214(2)(C) of the Older Americans 
Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3020e(2)(C)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``interventions and'' after ``other''; and
            (2) by inserting ``and referral to food-based intervention 
        programs'' after ``and counseling''.
                                 <all>
```