alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 186 (Monday, September 26, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59393-59394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-24614]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, October 12, 2011; 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee 37830.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia J. Halsey, Federal 
Coordinator, Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 
2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 241-
1984 or e-mail: halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at 
www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The main meeting presentation will be an update 
on Bear Creek Valley on the Oak Ridge Reservation.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or 
special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact Patricia J. Halsey at least seven days in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Patricia J. Halsey at the address or 
telephone number listed above. Requests must be received five days 
prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include 
the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer 
is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate 
the orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Patricia 
J. Halsey at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will 
also be available at the following Web site: http://

[[Page 59394]]

www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC on September 21, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-24614 Filed 9-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. Chapter 409), and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued011335N
Aeronet, Inc., 42 Corporate Park, Suite 150, Irvine, CA 92606
December 28, 2006.015247NF
Amerindias, Inc., 5220 NW. 72nd Avenue, Bay 3, Miami, FL 33166
November 10, 2006.013692F
Gallagher Transport International, Inc., P.O. Box 39005, Denver, CO 80239
May 30, 2003.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. E7-4106 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TOM L. CAREY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:04-cv-01225 MCE AC P 

ORDER 

 A further hearing on defendant’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement has been 

scheduled for November 4, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. ECF No. 363. Defendant has requested 

permission to invite plaintiff’s mother, the third-party beneficiary to the settlement agreement, to 

participate in the November 4, 2015 hearing via telephone. 

 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant’s request for 

permission to invite the third-party beneficiary to participate in the November 4, 2015 hearing 

(ECF No. 365) is granted. 

DATED: October 26, 2015 

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 366 Filed 10/27/15 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON, No. 2:04-cv-0776-TLN-EFB P 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

 

D.L. RUNNELS, et al., 

 ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 Defendants. AD TESTIFICANDUM

 / 

Vance Edward Johnson, CDCR # P-48409, a necessary and material witness in a 

settlement conference in this case on March 13, 2014, is confined in Pleasant Valley State Prison 

(PVSP), in the custody of the Warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary 

that a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the 

inmate before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison at the U. S. District Court, Courtroom #9, 501 

I Street, Sacramento, California 95814, on Thursday, March 13, 2014 at 1:00 p.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court, 

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a 

settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement 

conference or as ordered by Judge Kellison. 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is 

ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden, PVSP, P.O. Box 8500, Coalinga, California 93210: 

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge Kellison at the 

time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered by Judge 

Kellison. 

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate 

and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

DATED: January 28, 2014. 

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 258 Filed 01/28/14 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Tracey, Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 645]

—Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Montgomery County (Aison, J.), rendered August 16, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In September 1993, defendant was indicted and charged with two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree for selling cocaine to undercover law enforcement agents on two separate occasions. Defendant ultimately pleaded guilty to one count of criminal sale of controlled substance in the third degree. Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to 5 to 10 years in prison and this appeal ensued.

Initially, insofar as the record discloses that defendant entered into a knowing and voluntary waiver of his right to appeal in connection with the plea agreement *(see, People v Muniz,*215 AD2d 881, 883), we find no merit to defendant’s contention that this waiver should be given no effect. In any event, although defendant now challenges the restitution ordered to reimburse funds expended in the "buy and bust” operation leading to his conviction, we note that defendant expressly agreed to this amount *(see, People v Serafini,*213 AD2d 1066, *lv denied*85 NY2d 980). Further, we find no reason to conclude that the subject order of restitution pursuant to Penal Law § 60.27 (9) was illegal simply because it was the District Attorney’s office that originally provided the funds that were expended by the law enforcement personnel involved in the undercover operation. In our view the legislative purpose of "preventing] convicted narcotics offenders from reaping a windfall” (Mem of Senate Sponsor, L 1991, ch 545, 1991 NY Legis Ann, at 300) was fulfilled in this case. Finally, we have examined defendant’s claim that his negotiated sentence is harsh and excessive and find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court *(see, People v Martin,*215 AD2d 942, 942-943).

*739Mercure, J. P., White, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Before the Second Division,

November 27, 1946

No. 51435.

#### Protests 466285-G, etc., of Julius Kayser & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was sustained.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JULIAN J. BUKLEREWICZ, Seaman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

20 USCMA 128, 42 CMR 320

No. 23,284

November 6, 1970

*Captain R. 0. Kellam,*JAGC, USN, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Charles J. Keever,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The pendency of United States v Palos, 20 USCMA 104, 42 CMR 296, decided this date, led us to grant review in this case. For the reasons set out in our opinion in *Palos,*we *affirm*the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review.

Judge Darden concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting):

I dissent.

I disagree with my brothers’ holding in this case that the plea of guilty was properly accepted by the military judge for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Palos, 20 USCMA 104, 42 CMR 296 (1970). The military judge's failure to make a specific finding on the record that the accused knowingly, intelligently, and consciously waived his right against self-incrimination, his right to trial of the facts by a court-martial, and his right to be confronted by the witnesses against him, is, in my opinion, reversible error. Cf. United States v Donohew, 18 USCMA 149, 39 CMR 149 (1969); United States v Fortier, 19 USCMA 149, 41 CMR 149 (1969). Without this specific finding on the record, the record is not verbatim as required by law. See my separate opinion in Palos, supra.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3


ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COMMENCEMENT DATE
This ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COMMENCEMENT DATE is made as of this 7 day of October, 2016, between ARE-PA REGION NO. 7, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Landlord”), and ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA, INC., a Delaware corporation (“Tenant”), and is attached to and made a part of the Lease Agreement dated as of August 9, 2016 (“Lease”), by and between Landlord and Tenant.  Any initially capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Lease.
Landlord and Tenant hereby acknowledge and agree that the Commencement Date of the Base Term of the Lease is October 7, 2016 (subject to the applicable Base Rent Abatement set forth in Section 4(a) of the Lease) and the expiration date of the Base Term of the Lease shall be midnight on April 30, 2027.  In case of a conflict between the terms of the Lease and the terms of this Acknowledgment of Commencement Date, this Acknowledgment of Commencement Date shall control for all purposes.  
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF COMMENCEMENT DATE under seal to be effective on the date first above written.
TENANT:


ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA, INC.,
a Delaware corporation




By:     /s/ Bruce Cousins     (SEAL)
Name:     Bruce Cousins     
Title: EVP and Chief Financial Officer    






LANDLORD:


ARE-PA REGION NO. 7, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company


		
	By:
	ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES, L.P.,


a Delaware limited partnership, 
managing member


		
	By:
	ARE-QRS CORP.,


a Maryland corporation, 
general partner


                        
By:  /s/ Jennifer Banks  (SEAL)
Name: Jennifer Banks    
Title: EVP, General Counsel
Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Commercial Clothes Washers Final Rule Technical Support Document

 

Search Help More Search Options

EERE Information Center 

Printable Version Programs and Offices

Commercial Clothes Washers Final Rule Technical Support Document

Here you will find the technical analysis and results in support of the information presented in 

the final rule for commercial clothes washers.

The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download Adobe Reader.

● Title Page (PDF 17 KB)

● Table of Contents (PDF 13 KB)

Chapters 

● Chapter 1. Introduction (PDF 76 KB)

● Chapter 2. Analytical Framework (PDF 163 KB)

● Chapter 3. Market and Technology Assessment (PDF 693 KB)

● Chapter 4. Screening Analysis (PDF 38 KB)

● Chapter 5. Engineering Analysis (PDF 155 KB)

● Chapter 6. Energy and Water Use Determination (PDF 114 KB)

● Chapter 7. Markups for Equipment Price Determination (PDF 114 KB)

● Chapter 8. Life-Cycle Cost and Payback Period Analysis (PDF 427 KB)

● Chapter 9. Trial Standard Levels (PDF 26 KB)

● Chapter 10. Shipments Analysis (PDF 185 KB)

● Chapter 11. National Impact Analysis (PDF 181 KB)

● Chapter 12. Life-Cycle Cost Subgroup Analysis (PDF 126 KB)

● Chapter 13. Manufacturer Impact Analysis (PDF 713 KB)

● Chapter 14. Utility Impact Analysis (PDF 155 KB)

● Chapter 15. Employment Impact Analysis (PDF 51 KB)

● Chapter 16. Environmental Impact Analysis (PDF 167 KB)

● Chapter 17. Regulatory Impact Analysis (PDF 187 KB)

Appendices

● Appendix 5A AHAM Data Submittal (PDF 33 KB)

● Appendix 8A User Instructions for LCC and PBP Spreadsheets (PDF 28 KB)

● Appendix 8B Uncertainty and Variability (PDF 32 KB)

● Appendix 8C Lifetime Distributions (PDF 35 KB)

● Appendix 10A Relative Price Elasticity of Demand for Appliances (PDF 133 KB)

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/clothes_washers_ecs_final_rule_tsd.html (1 of 2) [1/22/2010 4:41:36 PM]

EERE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 69.1
Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Commercial Clothes Washers Final Rule Technical Support Document

● Appendix 11A User Instructions for Shipments and NIA Spreadsheets (PDF 23 KB)

● Appendix 11B National Equipment and Operating Costs (PDF 33 KB)

● Appendix 11C Market Segment Sensitivity Analysis (PDF 85 KB)

● Appendix 13A The Low-Volume Manufacturer (PDF 58 KB)

● Appendix 13B Government Regulatory Impact Model (GRIM) (PDF 61 KB)

● Appendix 13C Federal Production Tax Credit (PDF 82 KB)

● Appendix 14A Interpolation of Utility and Environmental Results from NEMS-BT Output 

(PDF 32 KB)

● Appendix 17A Regulatory Impact Analysis Supporting Material (PDF 108 KB)

Contact Information

Stephen Witkowski, P.E.

Project Manager 

202-586-7463

Printable Version

Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 01/18/2010 

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/commercial/clothes_washers_ecs_final_rule_tsd.html (2 of 2) [1/22/2010 4:41:36 PM]

EERE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 69.1
No. 61884.

#### Maher-App & Company *v.*United States,

protest 312283-K/14910, (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Outlook for the 24

‐ Hour PM2.5 NAAQS values at the Tacoma South L monitor

The low 2010 and 2011 98 th percentile 24

‐ Hour PM2.5 values brought the 2011 design value (DV) under

the NAAQS. This means the 2012 PM2.5 DV will almost certainly also be below the NAAQS. For the 2012

DV to exceed the NAAQS, the 2012 98 th percentile would have to exceed 49 ug/m 3

. 49 ug/m 3 is the

highest 98 th percentile value ever recorded at South L, and occurred over a decade ago (in 2000), which

was well before the current standard of 35 ug/m 3 and the current thresholds for calling burn bans.

Data from the first half of the 2012 burn season can be used to make an improved prediction for the

2012 98 th percentile, and also the 2012 DV. For context, the current 8 th highest value for 2012 (from Jan

‐

Feb 2012) is 19.4 ug/m 3

, and there were 3 exceedance days, with one being an exceptional event

(caused by widespread power outages) which potentially could be excluded from the 98 th percentile and

DV calculation.

For the following estimate I was conservative and did not exclude the potential exceptional event. I

estimated the likely 98 th percentile for 2012 by taking data from the first half of 2012 and combining it

with randomly generated Nov

‐ Dec 2012. The random Nov

‐ Dec 2012 was generated from daily values

from 12 previous years’ of Nov

‐ Dec. Performing this random generation of a potential Nov

‐ Dec 1012

10,000 times ( a 10,000 trial Monte Carlo simulation) yields a probability of the 2012 98 th percentile

exceeding 49 ug/m 3 of < 0.2%. Thus, the probability of the 2012 DV exceeding the NAAQS is < 0.2%.
No. 58041.

protest 204267-K (New York).

#### Nicholas J. Stevason *v.*United States,

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest consists of two articles described as prayer stands imported for presentation to, and for the use of, the Community of Three Hierarchs of the Greek Orthodox Church. Entry was made under the provisions of paragraph 1774 of the free list of the Tariff Act of 1930, which, at the time of importation, read as follows:

> Par. 1774. Altars, pulpits, communion tables, baptismal fonts, shrines, or parts of any of the foregoing, and statuary (except casts of plaster of Paris, or of compositions of paper or papier-máché), imported in good faith for presentation (without charge) to, and for the use of, any corporation or association organized and operated exclusively for religious purposes.

Free entry under the foregoing provision of law was denied by the collector solely on the ground that the prayer stands were not any of the articles specifically named in the foregoing language, nor parts thereof. They were assessed with duty at the rate of *12%*percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, for furniture of wood, other than chairs. The protest claim is for free entry under paragraph 1774, *supra,*as parts of shrines.

At the trial, it was established that the imported articles are ikon (or icon) prayer stands, to each of which, after importation, an ikon was securely affixed, and the complete entity was used as a unit. It was also established that no church of the Greek Orthodox faith can properly function and perform its services according to the canons of the church without the presence of ikons, which are placed in a position in the church before which all parishioners, upon entry, present themselves and pay proper reverence, and that in their function and use in that church the prayer stand, such as those in issue, is a necessary and indispensable part of the ikon.

It is clear that ikons as used in the Greek Orthodox Church are objects of religious veneration, and, as such, they are within the meaning of the term “shrines,” as used in paragraph 1774, *supra.*See *C. Wildermann Co.*v. *United States,*56 Treas. Dec. 572, T. D. 43713, for an analogous situation. As it appears that the stands here in issue were a necessary and indispensable part of such ikons and as *470there is no question but that the requirements as to importation in good faith for presentation, etc., were met in this case, we hold that they are parts of shrines entitled to free entry under paragraph 1774, *supra.*

Judgment will therefore issue accordingly.
1

MEMORANDUM

Subject: Estimating Potential Biodiesel Consumption Under Cold Weather Limitations

From: Zoltan Jung

To: EPA Air Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0546

To estimate potential biodiesel consumption under cold weather limitations, we used annual 

state-by-state diesel volume consumption estimates derived from the EPA MOtor Vehicle 

Emission Simulator (MOVES). MOVES is a modeling system which estimates emissions of a 

broad range of pollutants from highway mobile sources using estimates of emission rates for 

various emission processes and vehicle activity and population inputs.

The annual diesel volume consumption estimates derived from MOVES were evenly divided 

across twelve months of the year to obtain monthly diesel volume consumption estimates. 

Monthly diesel volume consumption estimates were summed for the twenty most-northern states 

in the U.S. These states appear in green in the chart below. Diesel volume consumption 

estimates for four cold weather months (December through March) for the twenty northern-most 

states were subtracted from the sum total monthly estimates. This total was multiplied by five

volume-percent to derive the final estimate of the volume of B5 biodiesel that could be 

consumed under cold weather limitations for the nation as a whole if B5 is used in all states

during all months, with the exception of the four winter months for the twnety northern-most

states. This was estimated to be about 1.9 billion gallons.

State Estimated Biodiesel 

Consumption (as B5) (gal)

Estimated Annual Diesel 

Consumption (gal)

Alabama 4.4E+07 8.90E+08

Alaska 2.7E+06 8.10E+07

Arizona 5.2E+07 1.00E+09

Arkansas 2.2E+07 4.50E+08

California 1.5E+08 2.90E+09

Colorado 2.4E+07 4.80E+08

Connecticut 9.5E+06 1.90E+08

Delaware 4.3E+06 8.70E+07

Florida 1.3E+08 2.50E+09

Georgia 1.1E+08 2.20E+09
2

Idaho 1.3E+07 3.90E+08

Illinois 7.2E+07 2.10E+09

Indiana 3.9E+07 7.80E+08

Iowa 1.7E+07 5.10E+08

Kansas 2.1E+07 4.10E+08

Kentucky 4.1E+07 8.10E+08

Louisiana 3.4E+07 6.80E+08

Maine 7.3E+06 2.25E+08

Maryland 2.9E+07 5.80E+08

Massachusetts 8.8E+06 2.70E+08

Michigan 3.4E+07 1.04E+09

Minnesota 2.7E+07 8.25E+08

Mississippi 2.9E+07 5.80E+08 Missouri 9.0E+07 1.80E+09

Montana 6.8E+06 2.10E+08

Nebraska 1.2E+07 3.45E+08

Nevada 3.0E+06 6.00E+07

New Hampshire 4.4E+06 1.32E+08

New Jersey 2.9E+07 5.90E+08

New Mexico 2.1E+07 4.30E+08

New York 2.9E+07 8.55E+08

North Carolina 5.7E+07 1.10E+09

North Dakota 5.1E+06 1.50E+08

Ohio 1.0E+08 2.10E+09

Oklahoma 3.6E+07 7.10E+08

Oregon 1.4E+07 4.35E+08

Pennsylvania 5.2E+07 1.50E+09

Rhode Island 2.3E+06 4.70E+07
3

South Carolina 4.4E+07 8.70E+08

South Dakota 5.3E+06 1.65E+08

Tennessee 6.6E+07 1.30E+09

Texas 2.0E+08 4.10E+09

Utah 2.4E+07 4.90E+08

Vermont 2.3E+06 6.90E+07

Virginia 4.4E+07 8.90E+08

Washington 3.2E+07 9.75E+08

West Virginia 1.3E+07 2.60E+08

Wisconsin 3.1E+07 9.45E+08

Wyoming 5.7E+06 1.65E+08

Total 1.85E+09 4.07E+10