alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRACY ROMARA FOLEY, No. 2:04-cv-1223-MCE-GGH-P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

M.S. EVANS, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an

Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On January 19, 2006, the magistrate judge filed Findings and

Recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any Objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days. 

Case 2:04-cv-01223-MCE-GGH Document 15 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Neither party has filed Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the Findings and

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 19, 2006,

are adopted in full; and 

2. Respondent’s March 3, 2005, Motion to Dismiss is

granted, and this action is dismissed with prejudice.

DATED: March 8, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01223-MCE-GGH Document 15 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 58024.

protests 124610-K, etc. (New York).

#### M. Kopit Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8164)

#### S. H. Pomerance Co., Inc., a/c Norman M. Morris Watch Corp. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 714496, etc.

(Decided September 15, 1952)

*Lane, Young & Fox (William H. Fox*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

With regard to the first 10 appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made a part of this decision, it has been agreed between the parties hereto that the market value or the price at the time of exportation to the United States of the watch movements, watchcases, and watch parts covered by said appeals, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised value less 5 per centum of the *per se*unit appraised values, and that there was no higher export value.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. O. § 1402 (c)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for determining the values of the merchandise covered by the first 10 appeals listed in the attached schedule “A” and that such values were the appraised values less 5 per centum of the *per se*unit appraised values.

As to the remaining 157 appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made a part of this decision, the appeals, having been formally abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
69°45'E 70°E

35°45'N

39 A eoo

aggre Me ee ae oD
35°30'N A 3

39 i on

394 0000

&

EXPLANATION | 0 10 KILOMETERS

—— Road & Peak |——_

—--— Stream, mostly intermittant [__] Image quadrant or tile 0 5 MILES
O City, town, or village |_| Image subarea

—- Province boundary
EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp.(the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May 7, 2010





BY:/s/ Thomas J. Stirnweis


(Signature)


THOMAS J. STIRNWEIS


Vice President, Treasurer and


Chief Financial Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 49174.

#### Protests 47313-K, etc., of Fook Lee & Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protests were sustained.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Section 18 of the Vocera Communications, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended October 26, 2016 
 18. REPRICING; EXCHANGE AND BUYOUT OF AWARDS. The repricing of Options or SARs is not permitted without prior stockholder approval. Repricing is defined as amending the terms of outstanding
Options or SARS to reduce the exercise price, substituting or exchanging outstanding Options or SARs with or for Options or SARs with an exercise price that is less than the exercise price of the original Options or SARs or buying out Options or
SARs with an exercise price that is above the then-current fair market value of the Shares for cash or other Awards. The Committee may, at any time or from time to time authorize the Company, in the case of an Option or SAR exchange with stockholder
approval, and with the consent of the respective Participants (unless not required pursuant to Section 5.9 of the Plan), to pay cash or issue new Awards in exchange for the surrender and cancellation of any, or all, outstanding Awards.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of m-Wise, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mordechai Broudo,
      Chairman of the Board and Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Mordechai BroudoMordechai
                Broudo, Chairman





Dated:
      May 15, 2008
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 25 , 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00738

- CV

DAVID CASH MOORE , Appellant

V. SHARON D. ALLEN, ET AL , Appellee

On Appeal from the 412th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 73303I

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an attempted appeal from an order granting a motion to strike appellant’s pleadings to intervene in Danny Jones v. Sharon D. Allen, et al , (412th District Court, Brazoria County, Texas, trial court cause number 73301I). Because the record does not contain a final judgment in that case, this is an interlocutory matter that is not permitted to be appealed by statute. See Jack B. Anglin Co. v. Tipps , 842 S.W.2d 266, 272 (Tex. 1992).2 On October 29, 2014 , notification was transmitted to all parties of the

court ’ s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a). Appellant filed no response.
Accordingly
, the appeal is ordered dismissed and appellant’s pending
motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices McCally, Brown and Wise

.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 31.02

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

         I, Kenneth G.C. Telford, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Essential Innovations Technology
Corp.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 20, 2004


/s/ Kenneth G.C. Telford
-----------------------------
Kenneth G.C. Telford
Principal Financial Officer
No. 55253.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protests 145636-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
60°0'0"E 62°0'0"E 64°0'0"E 66°0'0"E 68°0'0"E 70°0'0"E 72°0'0"E 74°0'0"E 76°0'0"E

38°0'0"N

36°0'0"N

34°0'0"N

32°0'0"N

30°0'0"N

1 Khanneshin

Carbonatite

EXPLANATION

Area of interest

Province border

Country border

Scale 1:7,000,000

15 South Helmand

Travertine, copper, gold

10 Tourmaline

Tin

9 Dusar-Shaida

Copper, tin

20 Herat

Baruim, limestone

12 Nalbandon

Lead, zinc

 11

KharnakKanjar

Mercury

 21

Bakhud

Flourite

8 Kundalyan

Gold, copper

22 Uruzgan

Tin, tungsten

7 Zarkashan

Gold, copper

14 Katawas

Gold

23 Ghunday-Achin

Magnesite, talc

5 Aynak

Copper

3 Haji-Gak

Iron

2 Balkhab

Copper

16 Baghlan

Clay, gypsum

 18

Dudkash

Industrial

minerals

19 Kunduz

Celestite

13 Panjsher Valley

Emeralds, 

 silver

24 Nuristan

Pegmatites

17 Takhar

Evaporite

 4

 North 

Takhar

Placer gold

 6

Badakhshan

Lode gold

HERAT

FARAH

NIMROZ

HELMAND

KANDAHAR

ZABUL

GHAZNI

PAKTIKA

URUZGAN

GHOR

DAYKUNDI

BADGHIS

FARYAB

SARI-PUL

JAWZJAN

BALKH

SAMANGAN

BAMYAN

WARDAK

LOGAR

KABUL

PAKTYA

KHOST

NANGARHAR

LAGHMAN

KUNAR

BADAKHSHAN

TAKHAR

KUNDUZ

BAGHLAN

PARWAN KAPISA

NURISTAN

0 100 200 KILOMETERS

0 75 150 MILES

PANJSHER
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 30 , 2024

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 24

- 00126

- CV

ELLIOT BERRY , Appellant

V.

CAMDEN DEVELOPMENT INC , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4 Harris County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. 1216432

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 31, 2024

. The clerk’s
record was filed April 3, 2024

. The reporter’s record was not filed. No brief was
filed.

On May 6, 2024 , we issued a not ice stating t h at unless appellant s filed a brief within ten days the appeal was subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P . 42.3(b).2 Appellant filed no brief or other response. Accordingly, the appeal is orde red
dismissed.

P E R CURIAM

P anel co nsists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and H assan.
Case 2:04-cv-01787-KJM   Document 70    Filed 05/23/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-27T22:55:17-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
BEFORE the Third Division,

March 28, 1945

No. 50067.

#### Protests 37651-K, etc., of Tambara & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated and agreed that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Mutual Supply Co.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 136, C. D. 842), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATIONAL BROOM COMPANY OF ) 2:04-cv-1974-GEB-PAN 

CALIFORNIA, INC. DBA JLR GEAR, )

)

Plaintiff, ) AMENDED ORDER

)

v. ) 

)

SOLAR WIDE INDUSTRIAL, LTD., )

HUGHES SANONER, MICHAEL J. )

DOHERTY, PRINCESS INTERNATIONAL, )

INC., and JOSEPH FRIEDMAN, )

)

Defendants. )

)

On August 24, 2005, an Order was filed granting Attorney

Gregory T. Meath’s motion to withdraw as counsel of record for

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant National Broom Company of California

dba JLR Gear, and Cross-Defendant Jacob Rothman, effective at 3:00

p.m. on September 26, 2005. Today, Chambers received a declaration

filed by Jacob Rothman on August 22, 2005, in which Mr. Rothman

requests that “the court . . . require Mr. Meath to remain attorney of

record for 45 days.” The request for additional time is granted and

it is assumed that Mr. Rothman seeks 45 days from the date of

execution of his declaration to retain substitute counsel. Therefore,

Gregory T. Meath’s motion is granted effective at 3:00 p.m. on October

3, 2005. If JLR Gear has not substituted counsel in accordance with

Case 2:04-cv-01974-GEB-PAN Document 104 Filed 08/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Local Rule 83-182 by 3:00 p.m. on October 3, 2005, JLR Gear will

suffer the consequences of not having counsel.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 24, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01974-GEB-PAN Document 104 Filed 08/25/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 64161.

protest 59/30811 (New York).

#### Frederik Lunning, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In' accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vases in mineral colors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62694, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[111th Congress Public Law 301]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 124 STAT. 3271]]

Public Law 111-301
111th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in 
       Baltimore, Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security 
  Administration Operations Building, as the ``Robert M. Ball Federal 
           Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 14, 2010 -  [H.R. 5773]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in 
Baltimore, Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security 
Administration Operations Building, shall be known and designated as the 
``Robert M. Ball Federal Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert M. Ball 
Federal Building''.

    Approved December 14, 2010.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5773:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111-592 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010):
            Sept. 15, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 1, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
No. 58978.

protests 191674-K, etc. (New York).

#### Caron Spinning Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “T. D. 53159 Glean Content” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this cáse.
EPA FORM 6100-4 (DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form) Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form

This form is intended to capture the prime contractor’s actual and/or anticipated use of identified certified DBE 1 subcontractors 2 and the estimated dollar amount of each subcontract. An EPA Financial Assistance Agreement Recipient must require its prime contractors to complete this form and include it in the bid or proposal package. Prime contractors should also maintain a copy of this form on file.

Prime Contractor Name Project Name

Bid/ Proposal No. Assistance Agreement ID No. (if known) Point of Contact

Address
Telephone No. Email Address
Issuing/Funding Entity:

I have identified potential DBE certified subcontractors ___ YES ___ NO If yes, please complete the tabl e below. If no, please explain:

Subcontractor Name/ Company Name Company Address/ Phone/ Email Est. Dollar Amt Currently

DBE Certified?

1 A DBE is a Disadvantaged, Minority, or Woman Business Enterprise that has been certified by an entity from which EPA accepts certifications as described in 40 CFR 33.204-33.205 or certified by EPA. EPA accepts certifications from entities that meet or exceed EPA certification standards as described in 40 CFR 33.202.

2 Subcontractor is defined as a company, firm, joint venture, or individual who enters into an agreement with a contractor to provide services pursuant to an EPA award of financial assistance. Continue on back if needed OMB Control No: 2090-0030 Approval Expires: XX/XX/XXEPA FORM 6100-4 (DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form) OMB Control No: Approved: Approval Expires:

Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program

DBE Subcontractor Utilization Form

I certify under penalty of perjury that the forgoing statements are true and correct. Signing this form does not signify a commitment to utilize the subcontractors above. I am aware of that in the event of a replacement of a subcontractor, I will adhere to the replacement requirements set forth in 40 CFR Part 33 Section 33.302 (c).

The public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response. Send comments on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including through the use of automated collection techniques to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. Include the OMB control number in any correspondence. Do not send the completed form to this address.

Prime Contractor Signature Print Name

Title Date