alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           Dec-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                             PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               2,323,555
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               345,126
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                    204,537
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  184,815
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,058,033
<COMMON>                                  449,697
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  (1,664)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       428,452
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>            878,420
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          62
<PREFERRED>                                89,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                      934,007
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                          1,243
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>              74,180
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          1,083,056
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           3,058,033
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                 895,943
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                       71,113
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                662,108
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                733,221
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   162,722
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                        (13,980)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            148,742
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   72,182
<NET-INCOME>                               76,560
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 3,789
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>              72,771
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  100,269
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                  60,298
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                    208,484
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                1.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.18


</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

March 21, 1945

No. 50061.

#### Protests 940912-G, etc., of A. D. Cohen Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony established that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats similar to those involved in Abstract 47291, which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the items in question were held dutiable as claimed.
No. 46140.

#### Protest 999961-G of Lady Handicraft Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the evidence it was found that the weight of the yarn in question is 2,202)4 pounds rather than 2,226% pounds. The protest was accordingly sustained.
No. 51722.

#### Protest 118663-K of Paramount Distillers, Inc. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of barrels numbered 4, 16, 25, 27, 49, 53, 67, 88, 101, 121, 122, 136, 137, 142, 153, 154, 160, 164, and 194, was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.
No. 57301.

protests 30436-K, etc. (New York).

#### China Korean Fur Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
No. 60066.

#### Gold-Silver & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 234317-K, etc. (San Francisco).

*488Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of percussion caps similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gold-Silver & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 51, C. D. 1753), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 52282.

protest 131695-K (New York).

#### Silverite Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of cereal or baby dishes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Thorens, Inc.*v. *United States*(19 Cust. Ct. 67, C. D. 1069). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0003 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0003

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways and Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure (5895/2/2006 - C6-0309/2006 - 2004/0047(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 244 E , 18/10/2007 P. 0119 - 0119 *

P6_TA(2007)0003

Development of the Community's railways ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Directive 91/440/EEC on the development of the Community's railways and Directive 2001/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the allocation of railway infrastructure capacity and the levying of charges for the use of railway infrastructure (5895/2/2006 — C6-0309/2006 — 2004/0047(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (5895/2/2006 — C6-0309/2006) [1],

- having regard to its position at first reading [2] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2004)0139) [3],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0475/2006),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 289 E, 28.11.2006, p. 30.

[2] OJ C 227 E, 21.9.2006, p. 460.

[3] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4609 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to submit a report 

to Congress on vessel fires and responses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2024 

Mr. BOOKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To direct the Comptroller General of the United States to 

submit a report to Congress on vessel fires and responses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. GAO REPORT ON VESSEL FIRES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General 

6 of the United States shall submit to the Committee on 

7 Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Rep8 resentatives and the Committee on Commerce, Science, 

9 and Transportation of the Senate a report on the state 

10 of marine firefighting authorities, jurisdiction, plan reVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:29 Aug 07, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4609.IS S4609

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4609 IS

1 view, and other considerations with respect to vessel fires 

2 at waterfront facilities and within the navigable waters of 

3 the United States up to 3 nautical miles from the shore4 line. 

5 (b) CONTENTS.—In carrying out subsection (a), the 

6 Comptroller General shall— 

7 (1) examine factors that affect Federal and 

8 non-Federal collaboration aimed at reducing vessel 

9 and waterfront facility fire risk to local communities; 

10 (2) focus on the prevalence and frequency of 

11 vessel fires described in subsection (a); and 

12 (3) make recommendations for preparedness, 

13 responses to, training for, and other items for con14 sideration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
kool_ex1014.htm

EXHIBIT 10.14
 
 
 
 
	 
	1

	

	 


 
 
	 
	2

	

	 


 
 
	 
	3

	

	 


 
 
	 
	4

	

	 


 
 
	 
	5

	

	 


 
 
	 
	6

	

	 


 
 
	 
	7

	

	 


 
 
	 
	8

	

	 


 
 
	 
	9

	

	 


 
 
	 
	10

	

	 


 
 
	 
	11

	

	 


 
 
 
 
	12
No. R68/3.

reappraisement R61/3928 (New York).

#### The Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*1058In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *International Packers, Limited*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 636, Reap Dec. 11147), the court found and held that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for determining value of the canned corned beef exported from Argentina during the period January 1,1959, through December 31,1959, described on the invoice of the entry covered by this appeal for reappraisement and that such value per dozen tins is $2.7939, net packed.
No. 62552.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 310612-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of illuminating articles, wholly or in chief value of metal, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICIA E. OETTING, No. CIV S-04-1180 MCE KJM P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

GLORIA HENRY, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prison inmate proceeding pro se, has

filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local

General Order No. 262.

On June 27, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which

contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-01180-MCE -KJM Document 10 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Neither party has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 27, 2005,

are adopted in full; and 

2. Respondent’s September 2, 2004 motion to dismiss is

granted.

DATED: August 18, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01180-MCE -KJM Document 10 Filed 08/18/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH ROBINSON,

Plaintiff, 2:04-1888-GEB-DAD-PS

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On October 24, 2005, the magistrate judge filed

findings and recommendations herein which were served on all

parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed

within ten days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings

and recommendations and defendants have filed a reply.

Case 2:04-cv-01888-GEB-DAD Document 85 Filed 11/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 24,

2005, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendants Reichle and Hagwood are dismissed from

this action pursuant to plaintiff’s voluntary request. See Fed.

R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2);

3. The pending motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule

12(b)(6) is granted as to defendants Plumas County, Jeff Cunan

and Gary McGowan;

4. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is dismissed

without further leave to amend; and

5. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

Dated: November 22, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01888-GEB-DAD Document 85 Filed 11/22/05 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 8670)

Entry No. W-03186.

#### N. Y. Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 10, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise, consisting of rubber goods, toys and other novelties from Japan, purchased from the following concerns and embraced in the cases as noted herewith:

> Order Nos. Purchased from

> 26439 Sankyo Rubber Co., Ltd.

> 25927 Tagisishi Rubber Co.

> 26917 Ireyama Antimone Co.

> 26516 Hirano Shoten

> 27357 Marukin Shoten

> 20020 Tanaka Shoten

> which appear on the invoices covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above, at the time of exportation to the United States at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for salé to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges' and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less the addition made to meet the advances by the Appraiser in similar cases covering nondutiable so-called (E. O. B.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this stipulation is limited to the items embraced in the cases purchased from the firms enumerated above.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise identified below:

> *527Order Nos. Purchased from

> 26489 Sankyo Rubber Co., Ltd. 25927 Tagisishi Rubber Co.

> 26917 Ireyama Antimone Co.

> 26516 Hirano Shoten

> 27357 Marukin Shoten

> 20020 Tanaka Shoten

and that such values were the appraised values, less the addition made to meet the advances by the appraiser in similar cases covering non-dutiable so-called (f. o. b.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling, and lighterage.

Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 55952.

protests 152840-K, etc. (New York).

#### J. Blank et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices *340should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 On June 2, 2005, plaintiff prematurely filed a notice of appeal and a motion to amend or 1

alter judgment under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVELLOUS A. GREENE, SR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1217 DFL KJM P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 17, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

1

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01217-DFL -KJM Document 10 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 17, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice to plaintiff filing his state law

claims in state court. 

DATED: 6/23/2005

 /s/ David F. Levi 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

gree1217.800

Case 2:04-cv-01217-DFL -KJM Document 10 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas E. Mills, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMP Productions,
Ltd.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6.     I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

February 12, 2010



                                          By /s/ Thomas Mills
                                          Thomas E. Mills
                                          President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,
                                          Chief  Financial  Officer,  and
                                          Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1














CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of FLATBUSH FEDERAL BANCORP, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Jesus R. Adia, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John S. Lotardo,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.














/s/ Jesus R. AdiaJesus R. AdiaPresident andChief Executive Officer/s/ John S. LotardoJohn S. LotardoExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer





Date: November 16, 2009








28
Before the First Division,

February 21, 1950

No. 54045.

#### West Coast Trading Company and Mattoon & Company *v.*United States,

petition 6556-R (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The petition was dismissed.