alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,445
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,189
<ALLOWANCES>                                       772
<INVENTORY>                                     22,450
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                85,702
<PP&E>                                          97,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                  72,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 141,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           61,008
<BONDS>                                         36,590
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,914
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,135)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   141,330
<SALES>                                        212,664
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               230,424
<CGS>                                          142,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  152,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                64,061
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,904
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,904
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,904
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.89<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86<F2>
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC PER SFAS 128
<F2>REPRESENTS EARNINGS PER SHARE - DILUTED PER SFAF 128
</FN>


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 9496)

#### Vetrital, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 56002.

(Decided August 26, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Coohran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain glass articles exported from Italy and entered at the port of New York.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value therefor is the unit invoice values, plus 29 cents per square meter, plus 3 per centum, net packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 46715.

#### Protest 946700-G of Collin & Gissel (Galveston).

*420Opinion by

Cline, J.

From the evidence presented and in harmony with *United States*v. *Woodward-Newhouse Co.*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 284, T. D. 39100) and Abstract 40749 it was held that the entered and appraised value of the merchandise is the unit value $0.04064 per pound and that in determining the dutiable value the collector should multiply the total number of pounds of mustard bran in the importation by the unit value,-and, after deducting any nondutiable charges included in such value, assess duty at the appropriate rate on the sum so found. The protest was therefore sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002.**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes LemmerzInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended October 31, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, James A. Yost, Vice President,Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ James A. Yost           James A. Yost *Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer*December 8, 2005
No. 55948.

protests 148352-K, etc. (Cleveland).

#### The Warner and Swasey Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL)

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change 

as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these 

substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on the Internet 

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.

***Final Site*** March 2011

MILFORD CONTAMINATEDAQUIFER Milford, Ohio

Clermont County

 Site Location:

The Milford Contaminated Aquifer site is a ground water plume contaminated with chlorinated solvents in the vicinity of 

Main Street and Lila Avenue in the City of Milford, Clermont County, Ohio.

 Site History:

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were first detected in City of Milford public wells in 1986. The Ohio Environmental 

Protection Agency began searching for the source of the VOC contamination in 1991. Despite several investigations, the 

source of VOC contamination has not been identified. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

Chlorinated solvents detected in ground water at the site include tetrachloroethene (PCE); trichloroethene (TCE); cis-1,2-

dichloroethene (DCE); and 1,1,1-trichloroethane (TCA). The plume is estimated to extend approximately 3,000 feet from 

the well field to its probable origin east of the well field. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment:

The City of Milford’s public supply wells were found to have been contaminated by VOCs. Samples collected from city 

well 3 before treatment contained PCE above its EPA’s Safe Drinking Water Act Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL), 

and TCE, cis-1,2-DCE, and 1,1,1-TCA above background levels. Samples collected from city wells 1 and 2 before 

treatment contained PCE and 1,1,1-TCA above background levels, and a sample collected from city well 4 before treatment 

was found to have 1,1,1-TCA above background levels. The City of Milford’s well field serves 6,000 people.

 Response Activities (to date):

The City of Milford installed and maintains an air stripper to remove VOCs from its treated water.

 Need for NPL Listing:

The State of Ohio referred the site to EPA because of the elevated VOCs found in the ground water that have contaminated 

the City of Milford’s public water supply wells. EPA received a letter of support for placing this site on the NPL from the 

state.
**EXHIBIT 12.1****Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges**                         **Three Months Ended** **Year Ended December 31,** **March 31, 2006** **2005** **2004** **2003** **2002** **2001** **($ in thousands)**Fixed charges:                       Interest expense$97,782  $185,935  $79,053  $39,956  $13,974  $4,286 Interest capitalized 128   932   —   —   —   — Interest portion of rental expense 332   1,244   1,494   843   429   223                         Total fixed charges$98,242  $188,111  $80,547  $40,799  $14,403  $4,509                                                      Earnings:                       Net incomebefore income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change$78,034  $269,072  $205,421  $132,480  $41,582  $6,792 Fixed charges 98,242   188,111   80,547   40,799   14,403   4,509 Less: Interest capitalized (128)  (932)  —   —   —   —                         Total earnings$176,148  $456,251  $285,968  $173,279  $55,985  $11,301                                                 Ratio of earnings to fixed charges **1.8** **x**  **2.4** **x**  **3.6** **x**  **4.2** **x**  **3.9** **x**  **2.5** **x**
No. 59563.

protests 218976-K and 218978-K (New York).

#### Aeolian Shipping Co. (Transferee) and Geo. E. Athans Co. (Transferee) *v.*United States,

*347Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Pecorino cheese and Peta cheese similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Fontana Hollywood Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1503) and *Lekas & Drivas, Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 242, C. D. 1660), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4372 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4372

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs to pay costs associated with the delivery of 
  automobiles or other conveyances to eligible persons, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 21, 2024

  Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Schatz) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
     Veterans Affairs to pay costs associated with the delivery of 
  automobiles or other conveyances to eligible persons, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Deliver for Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORITY FOR DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS COVERAGE OF COSTS 
              ASSOCIATED WITH DELIVERY OF AUTOMOBILES OR OTHER 
              CONVEYANCES TO ELIGIBLE PERSONS.

    Section 3902(a) of title 38, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``and the total shipping price to deliver the automobile or 
other conveyance to the eligible person'' after ``the total purchase 
price of the automobile or other conveyance''.

SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN HOUSING LOAN FEES.

    The loan fee table in section 3729(b)(2) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``November 15, 2031'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``November 20, 2031''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


             Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                           and Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.




                               /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



                               /s/ Christine R. Piano
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Christine R. Piano
                               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Date: August 7, 2007
Case No. 8,450.

#### LOCKWOOD et al. v. The GRACE GIRDLER.

[N. Y. Times,

March 30, 1864.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

1864.1

Collision — Between Sail Vessels in East River — Inevitable Accident.

The libelants [John W. Lockwood and others] w'ere owners of the yacht Ariel, w’hieh was run into by the Grace Girdler on August 5, 1SG3, in the Eastriver, off the foot of Stanton street. The vessels were both beating down the river with the wind to the eastward of south. They had just run out their long tacks, running from the Long Island shore to near the foot of Stanton street, where both went about. The Ariel went about first, and was a little to the leeward of the Girdler. Both vessels were then on their short tacks, the Ariel being a little in advance. As she began to make headway, she discovered a ferry-boat coming up the river, to avoid which she luffed and was brought into the track of the Grace Girdler, and the collision took place.

Mr. Black, for libelants.

Beebe. Dean & Donohu, for respondents.

Before SHIPMAN, District Judge.

1

 [Affirmed by circuit court; case unreported. Decree of circuit court affirmed by supreme court in 7 Wall. (74 U. S.) 196.]

HELD BY THE COURT:

That the witnesses do not materially differ, except as to the distance from the docks at which it took place, and the speed of the Girdler. That the Girdler having just gone about, and having but little headway on, it was not in her power to have luffed so as have avoided the Ariel. No collision could have taken place but from *763the untoward circumstance that the ferryboat was passing across the track of the vessels just as they had gone about. The luffing of the Ariel was necessary to avoid the ferry-boat, but it unfortunately brought her across the track of the Grace Girdler at a moment when she had no power to avoid a collision. That the collision must be considered an inevitable accident.

[NOTE. The libelants appealed to the circuit court, which affirmed this decision. Case not reported. From the decision of the circuit court they appealed to the supreme court, where the decision was again affirmed. Mr, Justice Swayne delivered the opinion of the court. He considered that from all the testimony in the case it is a fair presumption that the accident was inevitable. He said: “Inevitable accident is where a vessel is pursuing a lawful avocation in a lawful manner, using the proper precautions against danger, and an accident occurs. The highest degree of caution that can be used is not required. It is enough that it is reasonable under the circumstances. — such as is usual in similar cases, and has been found by long experience to be sufficient to answer the end in view, the safety of life and property.-’ But if the accident was not inevitable, the learned justice considered the Ariel to be in fault, or at least there is doubt. He says: “Where there is a reasonable doubt as to which party is to blame, the loss must be sustained by the party on whom it has fallen.” 7 Wall. (74 U. S.) 19G.]

Libel dismissed, with costs.
<PAGE>

                                           Exhibit 23-a

                           
                  CONSENT OF COUNSEL

     As   Senior   Vice  President-Corporate  Services,
Corporate  Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of  Kansas
City  Power  &  Light  Company,  I  have  reviewed  the
statements  as to matters of law and legal  conclusions
in  the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year
ended   December   31,  1998,  and   consent   to   the
incorporation  by reference of such statements  in  the
Company's   previously-filed  Form   S-3   Registration
Statements  (Registration  No.  33-51799,  Registration
No. 333-17285, and Registration No. 333-18139) and Form
S-8  Registration Statements (Registration No. 33-45618
and Registration No. 333-49353).

                          /s/Jeanie Sell Latz
                             Jeanie Sell Latz

Kansas City, Missouri
March 16, 1999
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 453 

To prohibit the implementation of new requirements to report bank account 

deposits and withdrawals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. 

MARSHALL, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. WICKER, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. CASSIDY, 

Mr. COTTON, Mr. DAINES, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. PAUL, 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. VANCE, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. 

GRAHAM, Mr. HOEVEN, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. RISCH, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. 

THUNE, Mr. MORAN, Ms. ERNST, and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the implementation of new requirements to report 

bank account deposits and withdrawals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibiting IRS Fi5 nancial Surveillance Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 453 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON NEW REQUIREMENTS TO REPORT 

2 BANK ACCOUNT DEPOSITS AND WITH3 DRAWALS. 

4 The Secretary of the Treasury (including any dele5 gate of the Secretary) may not require any financial insti6 tution to report— 

7 (1) the inflows or outflows of any account main8 tained by such institution, or 

9 (2) any balances, transactions, transfers, or 

10 similar information with respect to any such ac11 count, 

12 except to the extent that such reporting is required under 

13 any program, or other provision of law, as in effect on 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No. 48518.

#### Protest 28403-K of Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc. (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the • authority of Abstracts 42749 and 47546 the dime banks in question were held • dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339 as claimed.
No. 64865.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States,

protest 60/2364 (Seattle).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0005 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0005

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on international rail passengers' rights and obligations (5892/1/2006 - C6-0311/2006 - 2004/0049(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 244 E , 18/10/2007 P. 0159 - 0159 *

P6_TA(2007)0005

International rail passengers' rights and obligations ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution on the Council common position with a view to the adoption of a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on international rail passengers' rights and obligations (5892/1/2006 — C6-0311/2006 — 2004/0049(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (5892/1/2006 — C6-0311/2006) [1],

- having regard to its position at first reading [2] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2004)0143) [3],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0479/2006),

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 289 E, 28.11.2006, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 227 E, 21.9.2006, p. 490.

[3] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Medical Products,
Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Marshall B. Hunt
--------------------
Marshall B. Hunt
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
December 19, 1941

No. 46717.

Suit 4340.

#### United *States*v. *American Machine & Metals, Inc.*

C. D. 373 affirmed. C. A. D. 183.
From:     "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>                                                                                         

To:           Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA                                                                                                           

Cc:    Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA                                                                                                       

Date:      07/26/2010 09:37 AM                                                                                                                      

Subject:    RE: Portland Cement Supplemental Documents requested                                                                                    

Hi Keith,

Thank you for sending the of the ISIS model and the Engineering Analysis and Economic Impacts

Analysis.  I’d like to request the following document as well:

      ‐   Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document: NESHAP from the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry (RIA, p. 5‐1)

I’ve consolidated the list of documents we’ve asked for so far in one place – do you know when they will

be ready?

      ‐          Summary of Public Comments and Response document (p. 13)

      ‐          “Review of Environmental Justice Impacts”, June 2010 (p. 303)

      ‐          Floor Calculations for Final Portland Cement NESHAP (p.  33)

      ‐          Summary of Organic HAP Test Data (p. 57)  

‐          And if this has been updated, the Summary of Environmental and Cost Impacts of Proposed

Revisions to Portland Cement National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
No. 49183.

#### Protest 14705-K of Max Landau & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the documentary evidence produced the court found that the net dutiable weight is 21,944 pounds. The protest was therefore sustained to this extent.
No. 61359.

protests 252497-K (B), 278135-K, and 278212-K (New York).

#### Hershey Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items in question are not in chief value of galalith but that they are in chief value of steel, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.