alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 23, 2013

NO. 03-13-00194-CV

Blake B. Naleid, Appellant

v.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trust 2004-8AR, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

THIS DAY came on to be submitted to this Court appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal in the 

above cause, and the Court having fully considered said motion, and being of the opinion that 

same should be granted: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that said 

motion is granted, and that the appeal is dismissed. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellant

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision 

be certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**INTERLINE BRANDS, INC.**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Interline Brands, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 1, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Michael J. Grebe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   /S/ MICHAEL J. GREBE      |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Michael J. Grebe                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 11, 2005                       |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           3,995
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                       630
<INVENTORY>                                     17,426
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,740
<PP&E>                                          37,873
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,531
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  73,834
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,061
<BONDS>                                         13,308
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           186
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    73,834
<SALES>                                        118,946
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               118,946
<CGS>                                           46,140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,140
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 819
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,324)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (884)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,540)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.70)
        

</TABLE>
Reap. Dec. 10084.

#### Marvin Accessories, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Motion by plaintiffs.
No. 59550.

protests 261646-K, etc. (New York).

#### Camilli Albert & Laloue, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*342Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 6,741.

#### HOVEY v. The FRANCIS SKIDDY.

[43 Hunt. Mer. Mag. (1860) 68.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Collision — N egligence.

[A tug with a tow and a steamboat were navigated at a low rate- of speed in. the Hudson river, in a fog so thick that they were first warned of their dangerous proximity by the noise of each other's paddles when about 200 feet apart. The tug immediately reversed. The steamboat stopped, and then tried to cross the tug’s bows, and collided with the tow. *Hdd,*it appearing thar if the steamboat had reversed at once the collision • would not have happened, that she should be held solely in fault.] *603on the river so thick that the boats were' first warned of their dangerous proximity by the noise of each other’s ’ paddles, at a distance of some two or three hundred feet apart. The commissioner reported in favor of the libellant.

*602This case came up on exceptions to the report of the commissioner to whom the case was referred under the rules of January-term, 1859. The action was brought by [Alfred H. Hovey], the owner of the canal boat • Atlantic, to recover the damages occasioned by her being run into by the Skiddy on the Hudson river. The boat was in tow of the steam tug Illinois. There was a fog up-

*603HELD

BY THE COURT

(BETTS, District Judge):

That the commissioner had authority to hear the case under the rules. That the case is one of admiralty jurisdiction. That on the facts both vessels were culpable in being kept under headway in such a state of the atmosphere, though their fault was mitigated by their being driven at so low a rate of speed. That, if this fault had continued until the collision, it would have been a case- of mutual fault, .calling for an apportionment of the damages. That on the proofs, however, the tug stopped and backed at such a distance, that a like proceeding on the part of the Skiddy would probably have prevented a collision, and this fault no longer remained common to both. That, . when it was ascertained on the Skiddy that she was stopping in a critical closeness to the tug, she was started ahead, crossing the bows of the tug, and that this proceeding was a fault casting the blame of the collision upon her. That the pleadings on both -sides are faulty in not setting forth distinctly all the facts material to be proved to support the ease of the prosecution or defence, and proofs on those points not alleged would have been legally inadmissible. That the court also might refuse to decide those points not specifically at issue on the pleadings, but as the case has been fully discussed on the merits, and the pleadings can be reformed on an appeal, if one is taken, the court will decide on the law and facts of the case that the findings of the commissioner are correct, and that the exceptions must be overruled. Decree, therefore, for li-belant, with a reference to ascertain the damages.
No. 59542.

protest 237413-K (New York).

#### Marino Bros. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Pecorino (sheep’s milk) cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fontana Hollywood Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1503), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4576 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4576

    To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies 
  Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize the Colorado River System 
                      conservation pilot program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 18, 2024

 Mr. Hickenlooper (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Romney, Mr. Bennet, 
and Ms. Lummis) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Energy and Water Development and Related Agencies 
  Appropriations Act, 2015, to reauthorize the Colorado River System 
                      conservation pilot program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Colorado River Basin System 
Conservation Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF COLORADO RIVER SYSTEM CONSERVATION PILOT 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 206 of the Energy and Water Development and Related 
Agencies Appropriations Act, 2015 (43 U.S.C. 620 note; Public Law 113-
235), is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(2), by striking ``this Act'' and 
        inserting ``the Colorado River Basin System Conservation 
        Extension Act'';
            (2) in subsection (c)(2), by striking ``2024'' and 
        inserting ``2026''; and
            (3) in subsection (d), by striking ``2025'' and inserting 
        ``2027''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 52310.

protests 966583-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Wo Kee & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*313Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342) at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 as oranges; (2) apricot kernels the same as those involved in Abstract 34104 at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 762; and (3) Chinese drugs similar to those passed upon in *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372) were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs.
No. 44018.

#### Protest 803666-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Butler*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 120 C. D. 303) the Rockingham-ware in question was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 210 as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2

KINDER MORGAN, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 
OF THE 
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kinder Morgan, Inc. and will be retained by Kinder Morgan, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|                         |  |                                                            
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  March
  14, 2006 |  | /s/ Kimberly A. Dang                                       
|                         |  | Kimberly A. Dang
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer





---

---
No. 58547.

protest 225647-K (New York).

#### William A. Hoffman, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
2/21/23, 1:42 PM Wayback Machine

https://web.archive.org/web/20061101235344/http://www.census.gov/ftp/pub/industry/m37g9713.txt 1/1

The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20061101235344/http://www.census.gov/ftp/pub/industry/...

Current Industrial Reports

United States Department of Commerce

Economics and Statistics Administration

Bureau of the Census

Civil Aircraft and Aircraft Engines - 1997

M37G(97)-1

Issued July 24, 1998

Revised August 6, 1998

Revised August 14, 1998

Revised August 27, 1998

Information about the scope of the survey, methodology, explanation of terms

and historical notes for this survey may be found in the 1996 Manufacturing

Profiles issued July 1998.

These data are also available through the U.S. Department of Commerce and

STAT-USA Electronic Bulletin Board by subscription. To access, dial 202-482-3870

and follow the prompts to register; or call 202-482-1986, for further information.

Also, you may call 202-482-1986-STAT-USA, for further information. The Internet

address is: stat-usa.gov/.

For mail or fax copies of the publication, contact the Manufacturing and Construction

Division Information Center, 301-457-4673.

Address inquiries concerning these data to U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the

Census, Manufacturing and Construction Division, Washington, DC, 20233 or call

J. Christian Savage 301-457-1307.

Table 1. Quantity and Value of Shipments of Complete Civil Aircraft: 1997 and 1996

[Quantity in units. Value in thousands of dollars.]

 No. 1997 1996

Product Product description of

 code cos. Quantity Value Quantity 

Value

37215 -- Complete civil aircraft......... 35 6,557 30,087,152 5,633 

21,363,323

 Civil aircraft (fixed wing, powered).... 15 2,358 29,834,473 1,649 

21,158,854

37215 04 Unladen weight not exceeding

 2,000 kg (4,409 lbs.)................ 13 1,447 1,068,607 1,005 

848,888

37215 05 Unladen weight exceeding 2,000 kg

 (4,409 lbs.) but not exceeding

 15,000 kg (33,069 lbs.) 1/.......... 6 (D) (D) (D) 

(D)

37215 07 Unladen weight exceeding

 15,000 kg (33,069 lbs.) 1/.......... 3 911 28,765,866 644 

20,309,966

 Helicopters (rotary wing)............... 6 409 217,486 334 

179,290

37215 32 Unladen weight not exceeding

 2,000 kg (4,409 lbs.) 2/............. 5 (D) (D) (D) 

(D)

37215 34 Unladen weight exceeding

 2,000 kg (4,409 lbs.) 2/............. 2 409 217,486 334 

179 290
No. 54042.

#### Chas. Hall, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 147856-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 57293.

protest 196775-K (New York).

#### Sipanam, Incorporated *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
(Reap. Dec. 9504)

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1632-T.

(Decided September 15, 1959)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Goehran Doul),*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to one railway flanger car, No. DWP-56490, exported from Canada and entered at the port of International Falls-Ranier, Minn

Stipulated facts, upon which the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the railway flanger car in question is cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff' Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is. $8,579.81 (Canadian currency), and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-402]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Women's Business Council; Public Meeting

    In accordance with the Women's Business Ownership Act, Public Law 
106-554 as amended, the National Women's Business Council (NWBC) will 
hold a public meeting on Wednesday, February 7, 2007, starting at 8:30 
a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The meeting will take place at the U.S. Small 
Business Administration, Eisenhower Conference Rooms A & B, 409 Third 
Street, SW., Second floor, Washington, DC 20024.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the NWBC's fiscal year 
2007 strategy, agenda and action items, legislative updates, and status 
of fiscal year 2006 projects, along with an exchange of ideas about 
goals for the women's business community for the next three, five and 
ten years. Anyone wishing to attend the Council meeting must contact 
Katherine Stanley no later than Friday, February 2, 2007 by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5d363c2935382f343338732e293c333138241d2e3f3c733a322b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1cac0d5c9c4d3c8cfc48fd2d5c0cfcdc4d8e1d2c3c08fc6ced7">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to 202-205-6825. Anyone wishing to 
make a presentation to the Council during the meeting must contact 
Margaret M. Barton in writing at the National Women's Business Council, 
409 Third Street, SW., Suite 210, Washington, DC 20024, by e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#216c405346405344550f434053554e4f615243400f464e57"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="470a26352026352233692526353328290734252669202831">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to 202-205-6825 by Friday, January 26, 
2007, in order to be put on the agenda.

Matthew Teague,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-402 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
---

Exhibit 32.2

|CERTIFICATION                                                             
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350                                        
|As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"). I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: | May
      17, 2006 |  | /s/
      Abbas Salih     
|----- | ------------------ |  | --------------------------
|      |                    |  | Abbas Salih, CFO, Director

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARSHALL LOSKOT, an individual; )

and DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT ) CIV. S-04-1992 GEB PAN

EDUCATION, SERVICES: HELPING YOU )

HELP OTHERS, a California public )

benefit corporation, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) ORDER CONTINUING STATUS

) (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING)

UNITED PETROLEUM TRUCK STOP; ) CONFERENCE

RAKESH SEHGAL, an individual; and )

SEHGAL, INC., a California )

corporation, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiff’s Status Report, filed on August 15, 2005, reveals

that the Magistrate Judge has submitted matters for decision. 

Therefore, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for

August 29, 2005, is continued to October 31, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. 

Plaintiffs shall file a status report no later than October 17, 2005,

in which Plaintiffs are only required to explain the above referenced

submitted matters.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 19, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01992-GEB-PAN Document 32 Filed 08/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 2:04-cv-01992-GEB-PAN Document 32 Filed 08/19/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,506
<ALLOWANCES>                                        26
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,209
<PP&E>                                          47,415
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,925
<BONDS>                                         18,865<F1>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           760
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,856<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,668
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                28,725
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,734
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,149
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,136
<INCOME-TAX>                                       112
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,024
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
<FN>
<F1>CURRENT PORTION LT DEBT                          0
<F2>RETAINED EARNINGS                              971
<F2>TREASURY STOCK                               6,003
</FN>


</TABLE>