alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WILLIAM F. DOHERTY, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Petitioner v UNITED STATES, Respondent

20 USCMA 163, 43 CMR 3

Miscellaneous Docket No. 70-67

November 20, 1970

*Frank J. McGee, Jr., Esquire,*counsel for Petitioner.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court

Petitioner has filed a Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Other Appropriate Relief. It is therein averred that a charge alleging the premeditated murder of an unidentified Vietnamese civilian has been preferred against him and has been referred to an investigating officer pursuant to Article 32, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 832. The case of United States v Calley has been referred to trial by general court-martial at Fort Benning, Georgia, and involves a charge of the premeditated murder of several Vietnamese civilians, evidently arising out of generally the same incident involved in the charge against petitioner.

Petitioner declares that because of the publicity attending Lieutenant Cal-ley’s trial, there is a fair risk that he will be denied his right to an impartial Article 32 investigation. Accordingly, he seeks an order delaying the Calley trial until' completion of the investigation and, thereafter, until the charge against him has been dismissed or referred to trial.

In United States v Calley, 19 USCMA 96, 41 CMR 96 (1969), we held that the primary responsibility for protecting the fair and orderly administration of justice from the risks attendant upon news reports or other influences of a potentially prejudicial variety rests with the military judge.

A similar responsibility is placed upon an Article 32 investigating officer. Whether or not he has read *164or heard the reports of the Calley trial, and whether or not he has been influenced thereby, are matters ascertainable upon appropriate inquiry during the course of the investigation. With his responses thus made a part of the record, there is a reasonable basis for decision established for the investigating officer and for all subsequent tribunals authorized to pass upon the investigating officer’s qualifications. Where, as here, there is no indication that the investigating officer has been influenced in any way by the trial of another case, conducted at another station, and involving another individual, no foundation for the relief sought is presented.

The petition is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEKName:
    Freddie M. KotekTitle:
    Chairman of the Board of Directors,
Chief Executive Officer and
President of the Managing General Partner
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB for the Quarter Ended  November 30, 2006 (the "Report") by
Advanced Media Training, Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




January 8, 2007                        By:    /S/ ROB STEVENS
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Rob Stevens
                                              Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                              Financial Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4560 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide that State law shall 

apply to the use of motor vehicles on roads within a System unit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2024 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide that 

State law shall apply to the use of motor vehicles on 

roads within a System unit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. APPLICATION OF STATE LAW APPLICABLE TO 

4 THE USE OF MOTOR VEHICLES ON ROADS 

5 WITHIN A SYSTEM UNIT. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 1015 of 

7 title 54, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

8 end the following: 

9 ‘‘§ 101513. State law 

10 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4560 IS

1 ‘‘(1) OFF-HIGHWAY VEHICLE.—The term ‘off2 highway vehicle’ shall be defined by the State in 

3 which the applicable System unit is located, in ac4 cordance with the law of the State. 

5 ‘‘(2) ROAD.—The term ‘road’ means the main6 traveled surface of a roadway open to motor vehicles 

7 that is owned, controlled, or otherwise administered 

8 by the Service. 

9 ‘‘(b) APPLICABLE LAW.—The law of the State in 

10 which a System unit is located shall apply to the use of 

11 motor vehicles (including off-highway vehicles) on roads 

12 within a System unit. 

13 ‘‘(c) VIOLATIONS.—Violating a provision of State law 

14 applicable to a System unit under subsection (b) shall be 

15 prohibited in the applicable System unit.’’. 

16 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for sub17 chapter II of chapter 1015 of title 54, United States Code, 

18 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘101513. State law.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief
      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section  
1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities   Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.





Date:
                August 25, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Liu BoLiu
                Bo
              Chief
                Executive Officer
              (principal
                executive officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

             CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 16 - GLOBAL INCORPORATED

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corporate Property Associates
16-Global Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June
30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Gordon F. DuGan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Gordon F. DuGan
    -----------------------------
    Grdon F. DuGan
    Vice Chairman and
    Chief Executive Officer

        8/15/2005
   Date

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
No. 57310.

protest 98148-K (New York).

#### P. H. Petry Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

When this ease was called for trial, it was submitted on the same basis as the submission in Abstract 57282, namely, that the right to move to reopen or to set aside the submission was abandoned. An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient' to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protest was overruled. *(T. M. Duche & Sons*v. *United States,*39 C. C. P. A. 186, C. A. D. 485, certiorari denied, *T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc.*v. *United States,*344 U. S. 830, followed.)
February 13, 2013

MEMORANDUM: 2010-2011 Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Data on HCFC-22 Production 

Byproducts

TO: Air Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0354

This memorandum includes data submitted to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under 

Subpart O of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program (40 CFR Part 98). Subpart O covers HFC-23 

emissions associated with HCFC-22 production. Specifically, the following processes are covered by 

this regulation:

• Processes that produce HCFC–22 (chlorodifluoromethane or CHClF2) using chloroform and 

hydrogen fluoride. 

• HFC–23 destruction processes located at HCFC–22 production facilities. 

• HFC–23 destruction processes that destroy more than 2.14 metric tons of HFC–23 per year 

and that are not located at HCFC–22 production facilities. 

Since there is no minimum production threshold, all HCFC-22 production processes in the U.S. (and 

therefore all U.S. producers of HCFC-22) are covered by Subpart O reporting. 

Direct GHG Emissions of HFC-23 Reported by Facility in Metric Tons of CO2e

Facility City State

Total Reported Emissions

(MTCO2e)

2010 2011

DAIKIN AMERICA INC. DECATUR AL 5,324 4,809

DUPONT LOUISVILLE WORKS LOUISVILLE KY 3,265,138 4,710,701

DUPONT WASHINGTON WORKS WASHINGTON WV 16 66

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC -

BATON ROUGE PLANT

BATON 

ROUGE

LA 3,081,312 2,213,055

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC -

GEISMAR COMPLEX

GEISMAR LA 7 5,370

Important Information about this Data Set

- The data was reported to EPA by facilities as of 01/15/2013. EPA continues to quality assure data and may release updated data

later.

- Learn more about what is included in this data set and view related EPA GHG data sources at 

http://epa.gov/ghgreporting/ghgdata/ghgdatasets.html.
EXHIBIT
31.1




I,
Michael Schaffer, certify that:




I have
reviewed this Annual report on Form 10-K of Case Financial, Inc;




Based on
my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this Annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this Annual report;




The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:




(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the company, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
company's internal control over financial reporting;




The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.









/s/
      Michael SchafferMichael
      Schaffer
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              January
      13, 2010
No. 54664.

#### J. & H. Baer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 133048-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of feounsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
# Vital and Health Statistics Series

Print

Minus

Paper copies may be available at a **Government Depository** or a health sciences library near you. Highest numbers are most recent publications.

Subscribe to CDC’s free email service to receive alerts by e-mail when new reports are available.

## Active Series

**Series 1**. Programs and Collection Procedures

Reports describe the programs and data systems of the National Center for Health Statistics, and the data collection and survey methods used. Series 1 reports also include definitions, survey design, estimation, and other material necessary for understanding and analyzing the data.

**Series 2**. Data Evaluation and Methods Research

Reports present new statistical methodology including experimental tests of new survey methods, studies of vital and health statistics collection methods, new analytical techniques, objective evaluations of reliability of collected data, and objective evaluations of reliability of collected data, and contributions to statistical theory. Reports also include comparison of U.S. methodology with those of other countries.

**Series 3**. Analytical and Epidemiological Studies

Reports present data analyses, epidemiological studies, and descriptive statistics based on national surveys and data descriptive statistics based on national surveys and data systems. As of 2015, Series 3 includes reports that would have previously been published in Series 5, 10-15, and 20-23.

## Discontinued Series

        - Series 4 . Documents and Committee Reports
        - Series 5 . International Vital and Health Statistics Reports
        - Series 6 . Cognition and Survey Measurement
        - Series 10 . Data From the National Health Interview Survey
        - Series 11 . Data From the National Health Examination Survey, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, and the Hispanic Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
        - Series 12 . Data From the Institutionalized Populations Surveys
        - Series 13 . Data From the National Health Care Survey
        - Series 14 . Data on Health Resources: Manpower and Facilities
        - Series 15 . Data From Special Surveys
        - Series 16 . Compilations of Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics
        - Series 20 . Data on Mortality
        - Series 21 . Data on Natality, Marriage, and Divorce
        - Series 22 . Data From the National Mortality and Mortality Natality Surveys
        - Series 23 . Data From the National Survey of Family Growth
        - Series 24 . Compilations of Data on Natality, Mortality, Marriage, and Divorce

July 20, 2023
CDC/National Center for Health Statistics

- Facebook
- Twitter
- LinkedIn
- Syndicate
Exhibit 99.2

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Power & Light Company (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bernard J. Beaudoin, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Andrea F. Bielsker, as Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Bernard J. Beaudoin
Name: Bernard J. Beaudoin
Title:   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
Date:   February 28, 2003

/s/Andrea F. Bielsker
Name: Andrea F. Bielsker
Title:   Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Date:   February 28, 2003

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

In the document appearing on page 75496, FR Doc E6-21358, Procurement List Proposed Additions and Deletions, in the issue of December 15, 2006, the Committee published additions and deletions with a comment period to end date of January 21, 2007. The Committee is making a correction to the comment date. The new deadline for the submission of comments is January 14, 2007. 

In the document appearing on page 76966, FR Doc E6-21940, Procurement List Proposed Additions, in the issue of December 22, 2006, Committee published additions and deletions with a comment period to end date of January 28, 2007. The Committee is making a correction to the comment date. The new deadline for the submission of comments is January 21, 2007. 

Sheryl D. Kennerly, 

Director, Information Management.

 [FR Doc. E7-326 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD ROY MILLER, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-2446 DFL KJM P

vs.

A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no

absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d

453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at

any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing

§ 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be

served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. 

Petitioner has also requested an extension of time to file and serve objections to

the February 27, 2006 findings and recommendations. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s March 13, 2006 request for appointment of counsel is denied

without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings;

Case 2:04-cv-02446-JKS Document 25 Filed 03/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2. Petitioner’s March 13, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted in part;

and

3. Petitioner is granted ten days from the date of this order in which to file and

serve objections to the February 27, 2006 findings and recommendations. 

DATED: March 17, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2/mp

mill2446.110+111

Case 2:04-cv-02446-JKS Document 25 Filed 03/17/06 Page 2 of 2