alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4101

_____________________________ A USTIN L EAVITT ,
Petitioner
,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF H IGHWAY S AFETY AND M OTOR V EHICLES , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

. May 2 , 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

. W OLF , R OBERTS , and W ETHERELL , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 David M. Robbins and Susan Z. Cohen of Epstein & Robbins, Jacksonville
, for Petitioner

. Christie S. Utt, General Counsel, and Brandi Y. Thompson, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board 

          - [Order No. 1503] 

      ( print page 10642)    
Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order: 

*Whereas,*                     the Illinois International Port District, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 22, has applied for manufacturing authority under zone procedures within Subzone 22N, at the Michelin North America, Inc., tire-distribution facility located in Monee, Illinois, to conduct wheel assembly (FTZ Docket 4-2006; filed 2/2/2006);                 

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment has been given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (71 FR 7008, 2/10/06); and,                 

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied, and that the proposal is in the public interest;                 

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby approves the request for manufacturing authority related to wheel assembly, as described in the application and in the                     **Federal Register**                     notice, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.28.                 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 28th day of February 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

 [FR Doc. E7-4286 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4203]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission to OMB for 
Review; Comment Request

AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration (NCUA).

ACTION: Request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The NCUA intends to submit the following information 
collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13, 44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35). This information collection is published to obtain 
comments from the public.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until April 9, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments to 
NCUA Clearance Officer listed below: Clearance Officer: Mr. Neil 
McNamara, National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, 
Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428, Fax No. 703-837-2861, E-mail: 
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or 
a copy of the information collection request, should be directed to 
Tracy Sumpter at the National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke 
Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-3428, or at (703) 518-6444.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal for the following collection of 
information:
    Title: Federal Credit Union (FCU) Recordkeeping of Meeting Minutes 
and Other Documents.
    OMB Number: 3133-0057.
    Form Number: None.
    Type of Review: Reinstatement, without change, of a previously 
approved collection.
    Description: The Federal Credit Union (FCU) Act and NCUA's FCU 
Bylaws require each FCU to prepare and maintain minutes of its board 
and member meetings and copies of other documents and election results. 
Additionally, the board's secretary must inform the NCUA Board of any 
address change of a Federal credit union.
    Respondents: Federal credit unions.
    Estimated No. of Respondents/Recordkeepers: 5,189.
    Estimated Burden Hours per Response: 3.25 hours.
    Frequency of Response: Recordkeeping and reporting on occasion and 
annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 17,902.05 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: N/A.

    By the National Credit Union Administration Board on March 2, 
2007.
Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-4203 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN WASHINGTON WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2291 FCD KJM P

vs.

RICHARD W. SANDHAM, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02291-FCD-KJM Document 13 Filed 08/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s July 28, 2005 request for

the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: August 4, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/kf

will2291.31

Case 2:04-cv-02291-FCD-KJM Document 13 Filed 08/05/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of Sunway Global Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Liu Bo, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.






Date:
      April 14, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Liu BoLiu
      Bo
              Chief
      Executive Officer
              (principal
      executive officer)
(C. D. 252)

#### Leghorn Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States

United States Customs Court, Third Division

(Decided November 29, 1939)

*Strauss & Hedges (J. Bradley Colburn*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Webster J. Oliver,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel G. McGrath,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Before Cline, Evans, and Keefe, Judges.

Cline, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States, arising at the port of New York, in which the plaintiff claims that the collector *276of customs erred in assessing additional duty at tbe rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under section 304 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 on the ground that the merchandise was not legally marked at the time-of importation.

The record shows that the merchandise upon which the additional duty was assessed consists of olive oil imported in drums and the marking on the drums was stenciled thereon backwards, that is, the marking legend was “AISINUT FO TCUDORP” and the customs officers required that they be marked “PRODUCT OF TUNISIA” before they were released from customs custody.

We are of opinion that the marking appearing on the drums of olive oil at the time of importation was not in “legible English words” as-required by section 304 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Accordingly,, the protest is overruled. Judgment will be entered in favor of the-defendant.
ex4-9.htm


Exhibit 4.9

  

WARRANT MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

 

This Warrant Modification Agreement is entered into as of September 30, 2016, between Hercules Technology II, L.P. (the “Warrantholder”) and AcelRx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”). 

 

Recitals

 

A.     On December 16, 2013, the Company issued to Warrantholder a warrant (as amended by that certain Warrant Modification Agreement dated as of September 18, 2015, the “Warrant”) to purchase shares of its Common Stock on such terms as set forth therein. Any terms not specifically defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Warrant.

 

B.     In connection with an amendment to the Loan Agreement of even date herewith, the Company and the Warrantholder now desire to adjust the Exercise Price of the Warrant.

 

Now, therefore, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and Warrantholder agree as follows:

   

1.     The term “Exercise Price” in the Warrant is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:

 

“Exercise Price” means $3.07.

 

2.     Except as specifically set forth in this Warrant Modification Agreement, the Warrant remains unmodified and in full force and effect. 

  

 

***

 

 


 

 




 


     

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by its officers thereunto duly authorized as of the date set forth above.

 

 

	
COMPANY:
	
ACELRX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: 
	
/s/ HOWARD B. ROSEN
	
 

	
 
	
Name:
	
HOWARD B. ROSEN
	
 

	
 
	
Title:
	
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
	
 



 

 

	
WARRANTHOLDER: 
	
HERCULES TECHNOLOGY II, L.P.
	
 

	 	a Delaware limited partnership	 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By: 
	Hercules Technology SBIC Management, LLC, its General Partner	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
By:
	
Hercules Capital, Inc., its Manager
	
 

	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ JENNIFER CHOE 	 
	 	 	Name: Jennifer Choe	 
	 	Title: 	Assistant General Counsel	 


 

 

 

[signature page]
No. 50054.

#### Protests 973057-G, etc., of Philip Bauer Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the-court dismissed the protests.
#### John Kraus, Respondent, v Burton S. August et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

[635 NYS2d 564]

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at *1025Supreme Court, Cosgrove, J. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Cosgrove, J.—Labor Law.) Present—Den-man, P. J., Green, Fallon and Doerr, JJ.
II 

Calendar No. 419 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4541 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make certain provisions 

with respect to qualified ABLE programs permanent. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2024 

Mr. SCHMITT (for himself and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read the first time 

JUNE 17, 2024 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

certain provisions with respect to qualified ABLE programs permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Nationwide 

5 Access to a Better Life Experience Act’’ or the ‘‘ENABLE 

6 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

S 4541 PCS

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INCREASED CON2 TRIBUTIONS TO ABLE ACCOUNTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529A(b)(2)(B)(ii) of the 

4 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘before January 1, 2026’’. 

6 (b) ALLOWANCE OF SAVERS CREDIT.—Section 

7 25B(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 

8 amended by section 103(e)(1) of the SECURE 2.0 Act 

9 of 2022, is amended by striking ‘‘before January 1, 

10 2026,’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 SEC. 3. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF ROLLOVERS TO ABLE 

15 PROGRAMS FROM 529 PROGRAMS. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(c)(3)(C)(i)(III) of 

17 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

18 ‘‘before January 1, 2026,’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to distributions made after the 

21 date which is 10 days after the date of the enactment of 

22 this Act. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 419 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4541 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

ABLE programs permanent. make certain provisions with respect to qualified 

JUNE 17, 2024 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
---

---

Exhibit 4.(a).55

(not
an official translation-for convenience only)



The State of Israel
Ministry of Communications

General License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of
Mobile Radio Telephone (MRT) Services using the Cellular Method

# Amendment No. 42

By virtue of the powers of the
Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law
(Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have been delegated to us, by all our
other powers under any law and after having given Partner Communications Company
Ltd. (hereinafter: Partner) the opportunity to present their
arguments regarding this matter, we hereby amend the General License for the provision of
mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular method granted to Partner on 7
April 1998, as follows:

# Amendment of Article 65

|1. | In
article 65.2, instead of  than 30 days from shall come than
          two days from.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(14 January 2007)

| | (sgd)
Mordechai Mordechai  Director-General | (sgd)
Haim Giron, Adv.Senior Deputy Director-General,Engineering and Licensing
| | --------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASIDNGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 2 zao,; •J) 

MACH ONE AIR CHARTERS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO, [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Proceedings) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2015-0643 

;'=-<: 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR ADDTIONAL TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY 

Complainant, through counsel, moves for a modification to the Procedural Order served 

on June 15,2015, to allow the parties additional time in which to conduct discovery. 

The complaint in this matter was served on April28, 2015, and by Order served on May 

28, 2015, it was assigned to Judge Goodwin. By letter dated June 5, 2015, counsel for Mach One 

Charters, Inc., submitted a letter to Judge Goodwin in which he states he will be out of his office 

from Mid-July through the end of October 2015 and requests that no matters be set during that 

period. Consequently, in the June 15,2015 Procedural Order, the parties were given until 

November 6, 2015, in which to conclude all discovery. 

Three of Complainant's witnesses were deposed on October 29, 2015. These depositions 

were done concurrently with counsel for the pilots who faced certificate actions arising out of the 

incident. On about November 16, 2015, counsel for the pilots informed Complainant that 

because of an oddity with the specific aircraft in question, the checks conducted by two of the 

deposed witnesses may not have been reliable. It is, thus, now apparent that additional discovery 

is needed. 

1 
Complainant requests that the deadline for completing discovery be extended until June 

1, 2016. 

Respectfully submitted this 5th day of January 2016. 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By: 

Glenn H. Brown 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

2 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Re: Mach One Air Charters, Inc. 

FAA Case No. 2014WP210018 

DMS NO. FAA-2015-0643 

I hereby certify that on this date I served a copy ofthe COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR 

ADDTIONAL TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY postage-prepaid, certified mail, return 

receipt requested, addressed as follows: 

Hon Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Steven L. Graff, Respondent's counsel 

Steven L. Graff, Inc. 

43399 Calle De Velardo 

Temecula, CA 92592 

I further certify that on this date I have served the original and a copy of the 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR ADDTIONAL TIME TO CONDUCT DISCOVERY 

by postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

National Enforcement Progr 

Western Team 

222 West 7th Avenue Box 14 

Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587 

3
No. 50048.

#### Protests 14211-K, etc., of Han-Ver Liquor Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400> the court dismissed the protests.
Before the First Division,

February 28, 1951

No. 55258.

#### Continental Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 147399-K and 147774-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum statuettes and rosaries in glass containers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 54602, the items in question were held dutiable as follows: The statuettes at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as manufactures of metal; the rosaries, being valued at more than $1.25 per dozen, at 30 percent under the *eo nomine*provision therefor in paragraph 1544; and the glass containers at the same rate as their contents as the usual containers for the involved merchandise.
No. 60861.

#### Lucas Electrical Services, Inc., and Lep Transports, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 280329-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ammeters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lucas Electrical Services, Inc.,*and *Frank J. Eberle Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 1776), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

December 24, 1941

No. 46720.

#### Protest 843367-G of Parfumerie Lubin (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the bottles in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 40184. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23

(RS LOGO) RYDER SCOTT COMPANY                                FAX (303) 623-4258
          ---------------------
          PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS

<Table>
<S>                       <C>
600 SEVENTEENTH STREET    SUITE 161ON    DENVER, COLORADO 80202-5416    TELEPHONE (303) 623-9147
</Table>





                      CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


         We consent to the use on the Form 10-K of PrimeEnergy Corporation of
our reserve report and all schedules, exhibits, and attachments thereto
incorporated by reference of Form 10-K and to any reference made to us on Form
10-K as a result of such incorporation.

                                          Very truly yours,


                                          /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.

                                          RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.



Denver, Colorado
March 28, 2003




<Table>
<S>                               <C>
1100 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3800        HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218        TEL (713) 651-9191        FAX (713) 651-0849
3700, 700-2ND STREET, S.W.        CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 2W2         TEL (403) 262-2799        FAX (403) 262-2790
</Table>
Before the Second Division,

November 25, 1957

No. 61367.

protest 173829-K (New York).

#### Criterion Lamp & Shade Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.