alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
4.(a).30




Unofficial
Translation





[State
Emblem]





The State of
Israel


Ministry of
Communications





General License for Partner
Communications Ltd. for the Provision of


Mobile Radio Telephone (MRT)
Services using the Cellular Method





Amendment No.
53





By virtue
of the powers of the Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the
Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have
been delegated to us, by all our other powers under any law and after having
given Partner Communications
Company Ltd. (hereinafter: “Partner”) the opportunity to
present their arguments regarding this matter, we hereby amend the General
License for the provision of mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the
cellular method granted to Partner on 7 April 1998,  as
follows:





Amendment
of Article 75





1.
            After
      sub-section 75.8 shall come:
              
              "(d) for a call to an international destination, the
      Licensee can only receive the payment imposed on the international
      operator that is set forth in the interconnect
  regulations."




Commencement





2.
            This
      amendment shall be effective on the effective date of the amendment to the
      interconnect regulations regarding calls from an MRT network to an
      international operator network.





(31
January 2010)





(sgd)
              
              Eden Bar Tal, Adv.
              Director-General
            (sgd)
              
              Zeev Raz
              Temporary Senior Deputy Director-General
              Engineering and Licensing
Exhibit 21.1

KINDER MORGAN, INC.

> 
1-  Kinder Morgan (Delaware), Inc. - DE    2-  Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc. - DE    3-  Kinder Morgan Management, LLC - DE    4-  KMGP Services Company, Inc. - DE    5-  Kinder Morgan Services LLC - DE     6-  KN Cogeneration, Inc. - CO    7-  Thermo Gas Marketing, Inc. - CO    8-  Thermo Project Management, Inc. - CO    9-  Valley Operating, Inc. - CO    10- KN Thermo, L.L.C. - CO    11- Kinder Morgan Ft. Lupton Operator LLC - DE    12- Thermo Greeley, LLC - CO    13- KN Telecommunications, Inc. - CO    14- KN Gas Supply Services, Inc. - CO    15- KN Natural Gas, Inc. - CO    16- Red Rock Energy, LLC - DE    17- Interenergy Corporation - CO    18- Kinder Morgan Power Company - CO    19- KN TransColorado, Inc. - CO    20- KN Wattenberg Transmission Limited Liability Company - CO    21- Slurco Corporation - CO    22- Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company - CO    23- Kinder Morgan Foundation (nonprofit) - CO    24- Western Slope Energy Services, LLC - CO    25- KN Gas Gathering, Inc. - CO    26- MidCon Corp. - DE    27- MidCon Gas Services Corp. - DE    28- MCN Gulf Processing Corp. - DE    29- Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America - DE    30- NGPL Canyon Compression Co. - DE    31- Canyon Creek Compression Company - IL    32- KN Management Corp. - DE    33- MidCon Mexico Pipeline Corp. - DE    34- KN Energy International, Inc. - DE    35- Kinder Morgan Igasamex, Inc. - DE    36- KM International Services, Inc. - DE    37- Lake Power L.L.C. - DE    38- FR Holdings L.L.C. - CO    39- Front Range Energy Associates, LLC -DE    40- Kinder Morgan Michigan LLC - DE    41- Kinder Morgan Kansas LLC - DE    42- Kinder Morgan Illinois LLC - DE    43- Kinder Morgan Missouri LLC - DE    44- Kinder Morgan Power Partners LLC - DE    45- Kinder Morgan Georgia LLC - DE    46- Kinder Morgan Michigan Pipeline LLC - DE    47- Kinder Morgan Virginia LLC - DE    48- Kinder Morgan Arkansas LLC - DE    49- Kinder Morgan Oklahoma LLC - DE    50- Kinder Morgan Alabama LLC - DE    51- KM Turbine Facility #6 LLC - DE    52- KM Turbine Facility #7 LLC - DE    53- Kinder Morgan Operator LLC - DE    54- Kinder Morgan Michigan Operator LLC - DE    55- Kinder Morgan Michigan Servicer LLC - DE    56- Kinder Morgan Michigan Contractor LLC - DE    57- Kinder Morgan Michigan Developer LLC - DE    58- Triton Power Company LLC - DE    59- Triton Power Michigan LLC - DE    60- KMC Thermo, L.L.C. - CO    61- Special Purpose Venture, LLC - OH    62- Wildhorse Energy, LLC - DE    63- TransColorado Gas Transmission Company - NY    64- Administracion y Operacion de Infraestructura, S.A. de C.V. - Mexico    65- GNN Services, S. de R.L. de C.V. - Mexico    66- Gas Natural del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V. - Mexico    67- KN Thermo Acquisition, Inc. - CO    68- Kinder Morgan TransColorado LLC - DE    69- Kinder Morgan TransColorado, Inc. - UT
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.1


Exhibit A
Severance Matrix Effective August 25, 2016


	
					
	Years of Service
Role Level
	Less than 2 years
Severance Weeks
	>2, less than 5 years
Severance Weeks
	>5, less than 10 years
Severance Weeks
	>10 years
Severance Weeks

	Executive Committee / Executive Officersi / EVP
	16
	24
	36
	52

	Senior Vice President
	13
	20
	30
	42

	Vice President
	10
	16
	24
	32

	Senior Director
	8
	14
	21
	28

	Director
	6
	12
	18
	24

	Levels 2 and 3
	4
	8
	12
	16

	Levels 4 and 5
	3
	6
	9
	12

	Levels 6, 7 and 8
	2
	4
	6
	8










__________________________________
i "Executive officer" shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in Rule 3b-7 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall include those persons designated as "executive officers" by the Cerner Corporation Board of Directors from time to time.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK RONALD HOLLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2006 MCE PAN P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 22, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. On July

26, 2006, defendants requested leave to act beyond time to August 21, 2006, to oppose plaintiff’s

motion for summary judgment and to cross-move for summary judgment. The court finds good

cause and will grant the request. Defendants shall file their opposition and cross-motion on or

before August 21, 2006. Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ opposition and opposition to the crossmotion shall be served on or before September 28, 2006. Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s

opposition shall be served on or before October 6, 2006.

On July 13, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion in limine. Plaintiff is advised that this

motion is premature. Motions in limine are generally filed seven days prior to trial. However,

Case 2:04-cv-02006-MCE -EFB Document 69 Filed 07/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

plaintiff will be instructed, in the court’s pretrial order, when he should file such motions.

Plaintiff’s motion will be denied without prejudice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ July 26, 2006 request is granted.

2. Defendants shall file their opposition and cross-motion on or before August 21,

2006. Plaintiff’s reply to Defendants’ opposition and opposition to the cross-motion shall be

served on or before September 28, 2006. Defendants’ reply to Plaintiff’s opposition shall be

served on or before October 6, 2006.

3. Plaintiff’s July 13, 2006 motion is denied without prejudice.

DATED: July 27, 2006.

001; holl2006.ext

Case 2:04-cv-02006-MCE -EFB Document 69 Filed 07/27/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 49164.

#### Protest 56917-K of F. Blumenthal & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the hats in question are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which record- was-admi.tted~,in evidence hereifl. The protest was therefore sustained" to this extent.
No. 53534.

protests 657671-G, etc. (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT RAMESES,

Petitioner,

v.

SCOTT KERNAN, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV S-04-1173 GEB GGH P

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent’s request for a 30-day extension of time to file an

answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus is hereby granted. The answer to the petition

shall be filed on or before January 28, 2006.

Dated: 1/4/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

___________________________________

HONORABLE GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States Magistrate Judge 

rame1173.por

Case 2:04-cv-01173-GEB -GGH Document 37 Filed 01/04/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 59537.

protests 190852-K, etc. (New York).

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

                             As Adopted Pursuant To

                  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Peter W. DeVecchis, President of Solomon Technologies,  Inc. (the "Company"),
certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

o    the  Company's  Quarterly  Report  on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ended
     September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
     the date hereof (the  "Report")  fully  complies with the  requirements  of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the Company
     for the periods presented therein.


/s/ Peter W. DeVecchis, Jr.
---------------------------
Peter W. DeVecchis, Jr.
President
October 20, 2004


                                      -19-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Pursuant to petitioner’s objections, the court acknowledges that materials before the 1

court suggest that the incident at issue in this action occurred on January 30, 2004, not January

20, 2004 as indicated by the magistrate judge in her findings and recommendations. See Compl.

at 6:16. Also, it appears that all references to defendant Trullinger in Section I. C. 1. of the

findings and recommendations should be to defendant Simmerson.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID EARL WALKER,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-1671-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

K. CLEMENT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 9, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

1

Case 2:04-cv-01671-GEB -KJM Document 46 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 9, 2006, are adopted in full;

and

2. Defendants’ February 24, 2006 motion for summary judgment is denied. 

Dated: September 18, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01671-GEB -KJM Document 46 Filed 09/19/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 54669.

#### Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 95356-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands similar in all material respects to those the ■subject of *United States*v. *Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 78, C. A. D. 401), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133045 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133045 

 COA: 271068 

St. Joseph CC: 03-011902-FC

WILLIAM LESTER SUMMERS,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

p0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Edward L. Stern, certify that:



I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation;



1. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



3. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) [Intentionally Omitted];



c) Evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and;



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the
registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and;



4. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):



a) All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|/s/ Edward L. Stern, |  | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |  | Date: September 24, 2003
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------
Before the Third Division,

January 26, 1944

No. 49169.

#### Protest 102219-K of Chesebro, Robbins & Graham, Inc. (New York).

*251Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise in question consists of frozen frogs’ legs similar to those involved in *Pacific Trading Co.*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 221, C. D. 610), the record in which case was admitted in evidence herein. The protest was sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JOURNAL EMPLOYEES' STOCK TRUST AS OF AND FOR THE 
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               27,887<F1>
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               27,887<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>The only revenue and expense associated with the trust pertain to dividends
received and paid out.  All dividends received are in turn paid out, accounting
for net income of zero ($0).
<F2>Earnings per share is not applicable as net income is zero ($0).
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
No. 57724.

#### Bluefries New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 208139-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50447.

D.C. No. CR-99-02307-RMB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 7, 2001.*

Decided June 21, 2001.

Before D.W. NELSON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Patricia Alvarado appeals her conviction and sentence for possession of marijuana *537with intent to distribute, importation of marijuana, and making a false statement to a customs official. *See*21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 952, 960; 18 U.S.C. § 1001. We affirm.

Alvarado contends that the district court abused its discretion when it admitted evidence that she was to receive a welfare check. We disagree.

We recognize that evidence of Alvarado’s straitened circumstances could not be admitted simply to show that she was poor. *See United States v. Mitchell,*172 F.3d 1104, 1108-09 (9th Cir.1999); *United States v. Jackson,*882 F.2d 1444, 1449 (9th Cir.1989). But the evidence could be admitted for other purposes. *See Jackson,*882 F.2d at 1449-50; *United States v. Feldman,*788 F.2d 544, 557 (9th Cir.1986); *United States v. Saniti,*604 F.2d 603, 604 (9th Cir.1979). Here the evidence was admitted to impeach her testimony that, although she did not have funds available at the time of her arrest, she would get a substantial sum with which to purchase an automobile in the first part of the following month. The district court did not err.1

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. Therefore, whether we review for plain error or for abuse of discretion, the result would be the same. See *Kelly v. City of Oakland,*198 F.3d 779, 786 (9th Cir.1999) (plain error); *United States v. Lui,*941 F.2d 844, 846 (9th Cir.1991) (abuse of discretion).
----

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Jesus R. Adia                                         |         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------------|
|   | Jesus      R. Adia                                        |         |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer                |         |
|   |                                                      |         |
|   |                                                      |         |
|   | /s/ John S. Lotardo                                       |    |
|   | John      S. Lotardo                                      |         |
|   | Executive      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |         |

|  Date: |  May 15,      2008 |   |   |
|-------------|-------------------------|--------|--------|

----