alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

*Correction:*                     This notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 23, 2007, Volume 72, Number 36, page 8166. The reference to the acronym SRIB 021 in the SEP title is corrected to read SBIR 021.                

*For Further Information Contact:*                     Felix Rogers, PhD, M.P.H., Scientific Review Administrator, Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Office of the Director, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop E05, Atlanta, GA 30333, Telephone 404.639.6101.                

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: February 28, 2007.

Elaine L. Baker,

Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. E7-3843 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                CERTIFICATION OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of OpenTV Corp. for the
period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, each of the undersigned officers of OpenTV Corp.
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:

     (1)  the annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of OpenTV Corp.

Date:  March 15, 2004
                                                      /s/ James J. Ackerman
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      James J. Ackerman
                                                      Chief Executive Officer



Date:  March 15, 2004
                                                      /s/ Richard Hornstein
                                                      --------------------------
                                                      Richard Hornstein
                                                      Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ LEO F. WELLS, III                   
|Leo F. Wells, III                       
|Principal Executive Officer May 13, 2009
|                                        
|/s/ DOUGLAS P. WILLIAMS                 
|Douglas P. Williams                     
|Principal Financial Officer May 13, 2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIGUEL E. DIAZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2375 MCE JFM P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed his second request for an extension of time to file a second

amended complaint pursuant to the court’s order of February 6, 2006. Good cause appearing, the

request will be granted. No further extensions of time will be granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's March 6, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a

second amended complaint. No further extensions of time will be granted.

DATED: March 15, 2006. 

12/mp;diaz2375.36sec(2)

Case 2:04-cv-02375-MCE -JFM Document 55 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 60872.

#### J. M. P. R. Trading Corp. and Alltransport, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 227236-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of monofilament fishing lines the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 60183, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 52996.

#### Balfour Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 124427-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
No. 55959.

protests 141812-K and 144073-K (New York).

#### C. J. Holt & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the tires and tubes and the issues involved are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *C. J. Holt & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 1352), the claim for allowance of drawback was sustained as to the tires and tubes mounted on the spare wheels of the exported automobiles.
No. 44028.

#### Protest 975171-G of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was conceded that certain items were composed in chief value of wood and that certain other items were composed in chief value of shell. From the testimony it was found that they are not chiefly used for the amusement of children. The claims at *33}i*percent under paragraph 412 and at 35 percent under paragraph 1538 were therefore sustained.
(November 9, 1995)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenneth L. Horton, Jr., Appellant.

[633 NYS2d 655]

—Spain, J.

*723Appeals (1) from a judgment of the County Court of Tioga County (Sgueglia, J.), rendered November 1, 1993, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree, (2) from an order of said court (Callanan, Sr., J.), entered April 25, 1994, which directed restitution, and (3) by permission, from an order of said court (Sgueglia, J.), entered August 26,1994, which denied defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, without a hearing.

On August 7,1993, a felony complaint was filed in the Owego Village Court in Tioga County charging defendant with one count of burglary in the second degree. As conceded by the People, defendant was neither arraigned in the local criminal court nor was his case held for Grand Jury action *(see,*CPL 195.10 [1] [a]). On September 21, 1993, defendant executed a written waiver of indictment and consented to be prosecuted by a superior court information charging burglary in the third degree and petit larceny. Following the entry of defendant’s plea of guilty to the single count of burglary in the third degree in satisfaction of this instrument, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to 3 to 6 years in prison. A restitution hearing was later held and defendant was directed to pay $1,050 in restitution. Defendant thereafter unsuccessfully moved pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the conviction. Defendant now appeals from his conviction, the restitution order and from County Court’s denial of his CPL 440.10 motion.

Defendant’s conviction must be reversed. There is no dispute that the superior court information upon which he was prosecuted was jurisdictionally defective due to lack of compliance with CPL 195.10 (1) (a) *(see, People v Rancka,*193 AD2d 1124, 1125; *People v Johnson,*187 AD2d 990). Accordingly, the superior court information must be dismissed, the restitution order vacated and the matter remitted to the court of original jurisdiction for further proceedings on the felony complaint *(see, People v Jacoy,*138 AD2d 837, 838). Given this result, it is not necessary to address defendant’s remaining arguments.

Mikoll, J. P., Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment and order entered April 25, 1994 are reversed, on the law, guilty plea vacated, superior court information dismissed, and matter remitted to the Owego Village Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this Court’s decision. Ordered that the appeal from order entered August 26,1994 is dismissed, as academic.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0174 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0174

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 May 2007 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (13736/1/2006 - C6-0042/2007 - 2000/0212(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 076 E , 27/03/2008 P. 0092 - 0092 *

P6_TA(2007)0174

Public passenger transport services by rail and road ***II

European Parliament legislative resolution of 10 May 2007 on the Council common position for adopting a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on public passenger transport services by rail and by road and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) Nos 1191/69 and 1107/70 (13736/1/2006 — C6-0042/2007 — 2000/0212(COD))

(Codecision procedure: second reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Council common position (13736/1/2006 — C6-0042/2007) [1],

- having regard to its position at first reading [2] on the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2000)0007) [3],

- having regard to the first amended Commission proposal (COM(2002)0107) [4],

- having regard to the second amended Commission proposal (COM(2005)0319) [5],

- having regard to Article 251(2) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Rule 62 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0131/2007);

1. Approves the common position as amended;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] OJ C 70 E, 27.3.2007, p. 1.

[2] OJ C 140 E, 13.6.2002, p. 262.

[3] OJ C 365 E, 19.12.2000, p. 169.

[4] OJ C 151 E, 25.6.2002, p. 146.

[5] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
No. 52617.

protest 61124-K (New York).

#### Ellis Silver Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*221Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on entries 813416 and 814708. The protest was sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TUTUILA F. TUVALU,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1724 DFL KJM P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On February 3, 2006, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the

complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant Sandoval was returned unserved because

"unable to locate." Plaintiff must provide additional information to serve this defendant. 

Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through discovery, the California Public Records

Act, Calif. Gov't. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means available to plaintiff. If access to the

required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may seek judicial intervention.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one USM-285 form,

along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed April 11, 2005;

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 45 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant; 

b. Two copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed April 11, 2005;

and

c. One completed summons form (if not previously provided) 

or show good cause why he cannot provide such information.

DATED: March 13, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/mp

tuva1724.8e

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 45 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TUTUILA F. TUVALU,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1724 DFL KJM P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 1 completed summons form

 1 completed USM-285 forms

 2 copies of the April 11, 2005 

 Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 45 Filed 03/14/06 Page 3 of 3
No. 58573.

protest 194435-K/4080 (Chicago).

#### Davies Turner & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wooden roosters similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 55996, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 48460.

#### Protests 980950-G, etc., of Gellman Bros. et al. (Minneapolis, etc.).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy
Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of September, 2008.


/s/ Roy Brown
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4047 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Before the First Division,

December 19, 1940

No. 44991.

#### Protest 783707-G of Burr & Keeler (New York).

Opinion by

Brown, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is wool hoods similar to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protest was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 Plaintiff’s counsel failed to timely file a motion for

summary judgment to be heard before the close of law and motion

practice set by the court’s Status Order.

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v. NO. CIV. S-04-2483 LKK/DAD

RODNEY L. CUNNINGHAM;

PAMELA L. CUNNINGHAM; and

GUILD MORTGAGE CO.,

Defendants.

 /

On January 5, 2006, plaintiff’s counsel in the abovecaptioned case was ordered to show cause why sanctions should not

be imposed for failure to comply with the deadlines set in the

court’s Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order.1 The court is in

receipt of plaintiff counsel’s response. 

No good cause being shown, counsel for plaintiff is sanctioned

in the amount of one hundred and fifty ($150.00) dollars. This sum

Case 2:04-cv-02483-LKK -DAD Document 39 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

shall be paid to the Clerk of the Court no later than thirty (30)

days from the effective date of this order. Counsel shall file an

affidavit accompanying the payment of this sanction which states

that it is paid personally by counsel, out of personal funds, and

is not and will not be billed, directly or indirectly, to the

client or in any way made the responsibility of the client as

attorneys' fees or costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: January 17, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-02483-LKK -DAD Document 39 Filed 01/19/06 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 467 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 467

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To modify the age requirement for the Student Incentive Payment Program 
                    of the State maritime academies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Changing Age-Determined Eligibility 
To Student Incentive Payments Act'' or the ``CADETS Act''.

SEC. 2. AGE REQUIREMENT FOR THE STUDENT INCENTIVE PAYMENT PROGRAM OF 
              THE STATE MARITIME ACADEMIES.

    Section 51509 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(i) Age Requirement.--The Secretary may make an agreement under 
this section only with a qualified student who will meet the age 
requirement for enlistment or commission in the Navy Reserve at the 
time of graduation from the academy.''.

            Passed the Senate May 16, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 467

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To modify the age requirement for the Student Incentive Payment Program 
                    of the State maritime academies.
```
No. 46735.

#### Protests 507925-G, etc., of Intersales Corp. of America et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the dogskins in question are undressed, the same as those the subject of *Brachman*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 153, C. D. 389). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

November 5, 1951

No. 55972.

petition 6805-R (New York).

#### Majestic Shipping & Forwarding Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The import manager of the petitioner testified that prior to making entry, he submitted the invoice to the appraiser for information as to the proper dutiable value and that in filing the original entry, petitioner entered on the basis as returned to it by the appraiser on the submission sheet. After the original entry was filed, petitioner was advised by the appraiser to amend certain items in the entry. It appeared from the official papers that the appraisement of the merchandise was completed prior to the payment of the additional duties incurred by reason of the amended entry. Upon the record presented it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.