alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**724 CA 12-02207**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

PATRICIA J. CURTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER

NEW YORK STATE COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE AT CORNELL, CORNELL UNIVERSITY, NELSON ROTH, VALERIE CROSS, HUNTER RAWLINGS, III, DONALD SMITH, KATHERINE EDMONDSON, LISA CLARK, SUSAN STEVENS SUAREZ, LINDA ALLEN MIZER, WENDY TARLOW, WALTER LYNN AND DANILEE POPPENSIEK, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

PATRICIA J. CURTO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT PRO SE.

VALERIE CROSS DORN, ITHACA, FOR DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Walker, A.J.), entered January 30, 2012. The order granted the motion of defendants-respondents to dismiss the complaint.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Matter of Laborers Intl. Union of N. Am., Local 210, AFL-CIO v Shevlin-Manning, Inc. , 147 AD2d 977).

Entered: June 7, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ABRAHIM RODRIGUEZ MENDEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1949 LKK DAD P

vs.

CRUZ BUSTAMANTE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed October 28, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do

so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:04-cv-01949-LKK -DAD Document 14 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: December 6, 2005.

DAD:lg

mend1949.fta

Case 2:04-cv-01949-LKK -DAD Document 14 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO MINOR JUDICIARY EDUCATION BOARD : : : No. 375 MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET **O R D E R PER CURIA**  **M:**

AND NOW , this 19 th day of August, 2014 , Richard E. Hammon,* Cumberland County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Minor Judiciary Education Board for a term expiring July 1, 201 7
. *Lay elector
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                 CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas E. Mills, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AMP Productions,
Ltd.;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

6.     I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant
changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including
any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses.

February 9, 2009



By /s/ Thomas Mills
   Thomas E. Mills
   President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,
   Chief  Financial  Officer,  and
   Principal Accounting Officer
# C_2006332EN.01000201.xml

| 30.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 332/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 332/2

---

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Regulation No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)
   (2)

1

2

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 332/02)

AUSTRIA

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation No 2407/92

| Name of air carrier | Address of air carrier | Permitted to carry | Decision effective since |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| AVAG AIR GmbH für Luftfahrt | A-5035 Salzburg — Flughafen |
| Innsbrucker Bundesstr. 111 |

Name of air carrier

Address of air carrier

Permitted to carry

Decision effective since

AVAG AIR GmbH für Luftfahrt

A-5035 Salzburg — Flughafen

Innsbrucker Bundesstr. 111

passengers, mail, cargo

2.11.2006

---

(1)  OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

1

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

2

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER JAMES,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1574 FCD PAN P

vs.

J. SOLIS, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner paid the filing fee. 

On September 21, 2005, the district court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss

petitioner’s third claim for relief for failure to exhaust available state remedies, denied

petitioner’s motion to stay pending exhaustion of that claim, and granted petitioner’s alternative

motion to delete the third claim for relief. This action therefore proceeds on petitioner’s first and

second claims for relief. Since petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed

violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to answer those two

claims.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within 45 days from the date of this order, respondent shall file and serve an

answer to the first and second claims for relief in the petition for writ of habeas filed in this court

Case 2:04-cv-01574-FCD-KJN Document 14 Filed 05/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The action was transferred to this court from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of California and filed herein on that date.

2

on August 5, 2004.1 See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondent shall include

with the answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the

issues presented in the application. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases; and

2. Petitioner’s reply, if any, is due on or before 30 days from the date

respondent’s answer is filed. 

DATED: May 11, 2006.

\004;jame1574.100 

Case 2:04-cv-01574-FCD-KJN Document 14 Filed 05/12/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRUCE SENATOR,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1653 GEB KJM PS

vs.

BAXTER DUNN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

actions. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On April 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

Case 2:04-cv-01653-GEB -KJM Document 10 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 8,

2005, are adopted in full; and

2. These action is dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

Dated: June 9, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01653-GEB -KJM Document 10 Filed 06/10/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 47853.

#### Protest 69706-K of Lou I. Lubin, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson , J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the racello hats or hoods are not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, and not blocked or trimmed, the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 47291, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
No. 63112.

#### C. P. Goerz American Optical Company and Grosse’ Jewels, N.Y. *v.*United States,

protests 58/16939 and 58/18531 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protests were dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3946 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3946

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Major Billy D. 
                          Waugh Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SERGEANT MAJOR BILLY D. WAUGH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Major Billy D. Waugh Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Major Billy D. Waugh Post Office''.

            Passed the Senate November 19, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3946

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
at 1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Major Billy D. 
                          Waugh Post Office''.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4636 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4636

    To require reporting on offerors that have denied requests for 
                   uncertified cost or pricing data.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              July 8, 2024

  Mr. Peters introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require reporting on offerors that have denied requests for 
                   uncertified cost or pricing data.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Contract Pricing Data Transparency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT TO REPORT OFFERORS THAT HAVE DENIED REQUESTS FOR 
              UNCERTIFIED COST OR PRICING DATA.

    Section 3705(b)(2)(B) of title 10, United States Code, is amended 
by striking ``may include a notation on such offerors in the system 
used by the Federal Government to monitor or record contractor past 
performance'' and inserting ``shall include an entry on such offerors 
in the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System 
within the System for Award Management''.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

December 10, 1958

No. 62562.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 298212-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise in question consist of illuminating articles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

August 11, 1944

No. 49668.

#### Protest 412360-G of Quong Lee & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial counsel for plaintiff stated that the entry was with the papers but that the invoice in the case had been lost. The parties stipulated that the merchandise in three cases, numbers 23 to 25, consists of bak hop, which is a crude drug. On the record as made the protest was sustained to this extent.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.
-----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
March 30, 2004
No. 59572.

protests 227951-K, etc. (New York).

#### Astoria Pan Americana, Inc., and J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ficin powder or *leche de oje en polvo*the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Astoria Pan-Americana, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 243, C. D. 1608), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

December 23, 1942

No. 47836.

#### Protest 43124-K of Butler Bros. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *N. Minami & Co.*(29 C. C. P. A. 169, C. A. D. 188) the protest was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIUS LEE JACKSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0983 LKK GGH P

vs.

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00983-LKK -GGH Document 40 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel

is denied.

DATED: 7/13/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

jack0983.31 

Case 2:04-cv-00983-LKK -GGH Document 40 Filed 07/14/05 Page 2 of 2
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA-2012 - 1035 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM235AD

ON CD: A320 -32 - 1346, R03 --- 1/7/10 A320 -32 - 1346, R02 --- 11/4/09 A320 -32 - 1346, R01 --- 10/27/09 A320 -32 - 1348 --- 12/3/08 A320 -32 - 1349, R03 --- 10/5/11 A320 -32 - 1349, R02 --- 1/16/10 A320 -32 - 1349, R01 --- 8/31/09 A320 -32 - 1349 --- 12/4/08 GE 200 - 32 - 535 --- 10/13/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
<PAGE>
                                                          Exhibit 23-b
                                                                      
                CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Kansas City Power & Light Company on Form S-3 (File  Nos.
33-51799,  333-17285 and 333-18139) and Form S-8 (File  Nos.  33-45618
and  33-58917) of our report dated January 30, 1998, on our audits  of
the  consolidated financial statements of Kansas City  Power  &  Light
Company  and Subsidiary as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for  the
years  ended  December  31,  1997, 1996, and  1995,  which  report  is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

                                        /s/Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Kansas City, Missouri
March 13, 1998
No. 61863.

#### Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 309627-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 65518.

#### A. *&*P. Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/644, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8674)

Entry No. 1387.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 10, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for tbe plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between tbe respective parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise consisting of 50 cases of Chip Blinds marked K-8387/8436, inclusive, and 4 cases of straw Hot Plates marked K-8371/74, inclusive, at the time of exportation to the United States which appear on invoices covered by tne Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above, at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less the addition made to meet the advances by the Appraiser in similar cases covering non-dutiable so-called (P. O. B.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reapr praisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

*531On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the 50 cases of chip blinds marked K-8387/8436, inclusive, and 4 cases of straw hot plates marked K-8371/74, inclusive, and that such values were the appraised values, less the addition made to meet the advances by the appraiser in similar cases covering nondutiable so-called (f. o. b.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling, and lighterage.

Insofar as the appeal relates to all other merchandise, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TARVARIS HARRIS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-1344

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed September 18, 2020.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for DeSoto

County; Don T. Hall, Judge.

Tarvaris Harris, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa,

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.