alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 62563.

#### The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., and Globe Importing Co. *v.*United States,

protests 323027-K and 316044-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of constituent and integral parts of tiolet-box assemblies the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# EUR-Lex - 52007BP0135(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007BP0135(01)

**1. European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005, Section VII - Committee of the Regions (C6-0470/2006 - 2006/2076(DEC)) **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0339 - 0340 *

1.

European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for implementation of the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005, Section VII — Committee of the Regions (C6-0470/2006 — 2006/2076(DEC))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the European Union general budget for the financial year 2005 [1],

- having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Communities for the financial year 2005 — Volume I (C6-0470/2006) [2],

- having regard to the Annual Report of the Court of Auditors on implementation of the budget for the financial year 2005 and the Court of Auditors' special reports, together with the audited institutions' replies [3],

- having regard to the statement of assurance as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the Court of Auditors pursuant to Article 248 of the EC Treaty [4],

- having regard to Articles 272(10), 274, 275 and 276 of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [5], and in particular Articles 50, 86, 145, 146 and 147 thereof,

- having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Budgetary Control (A6-0106/2007),

1. Grants the Committee of the Regions' Secretary-General discharge for the implementation of the Committee of the Regions budget for the financial year 2005;

2. Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the Council, the Commission, the Court of Justice, the Court of Auditors, the European Economic and Social Committee, the Committee of the Regions, the European Ombudsman and the European Data Protection Supervisor, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

[1] OJ L 60, 8.3.2005.

[2] OJ C 264, 31.10.2006, p. 1.

[3] OJ C 263, 31.10.2006, p. 1.

[4] OJ C 263, 31.10.2006, p. 10.

[5] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

--------------------------------------------------
## *Dermatology*

### Acne

March 2001

----

**Clinical Focus***

- What treatments for managing acne are effective?
- What is the responsiveness of acne to first-line, second-line, and referral treatments?
- What are the side effects of treatment?

*Addressed in the summary or evidence report.

----

*Management of Acne*Summary (Publication No. 01-E018, March 2001)Evidence Report Volume I, Evidence Report Volume II (Publication No. 01-E019, September 2001) (File Download)

EPC: Johns Hopkins UniversityTopic Nominators: American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Dermatology

----

Return to Quick Menu: Evidence Report TopicsReturn to Evidence-based Practice
No. 59574.

protests 176954-K, etc. (New York).

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 65504.

#### Frank P. Dow, Inc., and California Stockmen’s Supply Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/34129 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of foot rot secateurs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64713, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 0 427 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2011 -NM - 202 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
# Book/Printed Material            Image 1 of Ecuador : a country study
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1532 

AN ACT 

To disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle 

for life an individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony involving human trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1532 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Human Trafficking 

3 on Our Roads Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIFETIME DISQUALIFICATION WITHOUT REIN5 STATEMENT. 

6 Section 31310(d) of title 49, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘CONTROLLED

9 SUBSTANCE VIOLATIONS’’ and inserting ‘‘LIFETIME

10 DISQUALIFICATION WITHOUT REINSTATEMENT’’; 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘(1) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE VIOLATIONS.—The 

13 Secretary’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(2) HUMAN TRAFFICKING VIOLATIONS.—The 

16 Secretary shall disqualify from operating a commer17 cial motor vehicle for life an individual who uses a 

18 commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony in19 volving an act or practice described in paragraph (9) 

20 of section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection 

21 Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9)).’’. 

Passed the Senate September 14, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1532 

AN ACT 

To disqualify from operating a commercial motor 

ing human trafficking. cial motor vehicle in committing a felony involvvehicle for life an individual who uses a commer-
January 4, 1943

No. 47885.

Suit 4403.

#### Joseph *B. Greenberg et al.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 626 dismissed October 30, 1942.
AVAQMD Rule 218 and 218.1 B - 3

Continuous Emission Monitoring Final Staff Report: 08/24/12
<PAGE>

SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION

BY THE

PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with this amendment to the Annual Report of KLM Royal Dutch
Airlines (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Leo M. van Wijk, the President & Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C., section 1350, that to my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the
      Company.

Date: August 31, 2004

LEO M. VAN WIJK
President & Chief Executive Officer

                                       65
No. 55961.

protest 157736-K (New York).

#### Metasco, Inc. *v.*United States,

*342Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of musical churches similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 55455, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Map of the world oceans.**
 
SuDoc Number:PREX 3.10/4-17:

Item Number:0856-A-38 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000896149
 
2012 | 2013 | 2015
 
May 14, 2020
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation for Dismissal and Order Thereon JONES v. JO ANN FABRICS, et. al.

 CIV. S.04-1958 FCD CMK

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GYPSIE JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

FCA OF OHIO, INC. DBA JO ANN’S; BILL

AND HELEN KWONG, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV.S. 04-1958 FCD CMK

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON 

Case 2:04-cv-01958-FCD-CMK Document 14 Filed 07/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation for Dismissal and Order Thereon JONES v. JO ANN FABRICS, et. al.

- 2 - CIV. S.04-1958 FCD CMK

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES:

Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Release between plaintiff, GYPSIE

JONES, and defendants, FCA OF OHIO, INC. DBA JO ANN’S; BILL AND HELEN

KWONG, the parties hereby request that all parties be dismissed with prejudice from the

above-entitled action.

Dated: July 21, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

 /s/ Lynn Hubbard, III 

LYNN HUBBARD, III 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: July 21, 2005 BROWN WINFIELD & CANZONERI, INC.

Signature on File 

ADRIAN GUERRA

Attorney for Defendant FCA OF OHOP, INC.

DBA JO ANN’S 

Dated: July 21, 2005 WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK SPROUL

Signature on File 

LIZBETH WEST

Attorney for Defendant BILL AND HELEN

KWONG

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S-04-

1958 FCD CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 22, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01958-FCD-CMK Document 14 Filed 07/22/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 53551.

protests 145247-K, etc. (St. Louis).

#### Burkart Shoe Company *v.*United States,

*166.Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of mats composed wholly of sisal fibers, which sisal fibers are similar in all material respects to those contained in the handbags which were the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4489 

To designate the Federal building located at 50 United Nations Plaza in 

San Francisco, California, as the ‘‘Senator Dianne Feinstein Federal 

Building’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2024 

Mr. PADILLA (for himself and Ms. BUTLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 50 United Nations Plaza in San Francisco, California, as the ‘‘Senator 

Dianne Feinstein Federal Building’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN FEDERAL BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

6 50 United Nations Plaza in San Francisco, California, 

7 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Senator Dianne 

8 Feinstein Federal Building’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4489 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

4 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Senator 

5 Dianne Feinstein Federal Building’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD   Document 267   Filed 01/09/14   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD   Document 267   Filed 01/09/14   Page 2 of 2

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2016-02-09T09:07:28-0500
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 449 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 449

  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the assignment of 
 patient advocates at medical facilities of the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2023

 Ms. Stabenow introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 38, United States Code, to improve the assignment of 
 patient advocates at medical facilities of the Department of Veterans 
                                Affairs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterans Patient Advocacy Act''.

SEC. 2. PATIENT ADVOCATES AT MEDICAL FACILITIES OF DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) In General.--Section 7309A of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsections (e) and (f) as subsections 
        (f) and (g), respectively; and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new 
        subsection (e):
    ``(e) Number of Patient Advocates.--Beginning on the date that is 
one year after the date of the enactment of the Veterans Patient 
Advocacy Act, the Director shall ensure that--
            ``(1) there is not fewer than one patient advocate for 
        every 13,500 veterans enrolled in the system of annual patient 
        enrollment of the Department established and operated under 
        section 1705(a) of this title; and
            ``(2) highly rural veterans may access the services of 
        patient advocates, including, to the extent practicable, by 
        assigning patient advocates to rural community-based outpatient 
        clinics.''.
    (b) GAO Report.--Not later than two years after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall submit to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and 
the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives a 
report evaluating the implementation by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs of subsection (e) of section 7309A of title 38, United States 
Code, as added by subsection (a)(2).
                                 <all>
```
TREATIES AND OTHER INTERNATIONAL ACTS SERIES 03-131.1 

________________________________________________________________________ 

DEFENSE 

Cooperative Projects 

 Memorandum of Understanding Between the 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

and OTHER GOVERNMENTS 

Signed at Washington, Wyton, Rome, and 

Canberra December 16, 2002, and January 7, 

January 17, and January 31, 2003 

with 

Annexes 

and 

Agreements Amending the Memorandum of Understanding 

Signed at Arlington, Copenhagen, Richmond, Wyton, and 

Rome August 27, September 8, September 15, and 

September 29, 2004 

Signed at Arlington, Canberra, Ballerup, Wyton, Ottawa, 

Oslo, and Rome January 29, February 13, February 22, 

March 4, April 16, and April 21, 2008 
 

NOTE BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

 Pursuant to Public Law 89—497, approved July 8, 1966 

(80 Stat. 271; 1 U.S.C. 113)—

“. . .the Treaties and Other International Acts Series issued 

under the authority of the Secretary of State shall be competent 

 evidence . . . of the treaties, international agreements other than 

treaties, and proclamations by the President of such treaties and 

international agreements other than treaties, as the case may be, 

therein contained, in all the courts of law and equity and of maritime 

jurisdiction, and in all the tribunals and public offices of the 

United States, and of the several States, without any further proof 

or authentication thereof.” 
 

 MULTILATERAL 

 Defense: Cooperative Projects 

 Memorandum of understanding signed at 

 Washington, Wyton, Rome, and Canberra 

 December 16, 2002 and January 7, January 17, 

 and January 31, 2003; 

 Entered into force January 31, 2003. 

 With annexes. 

 And agreements amending the memorandum of 

 understanding. 

 Signed at Arlington, Copenhagen, Richmond, 

 Wyton, and Rome August 27, September 8, 

 September 15, and September 29, 2004; 

 Entered into force September 29, 2004. 

 Signed at Arlington, Canberra, Ballerup, Wyton, 

 Ottawa, Oslo, and Rome January 29, 

 February 13, February 22, March 4, April 16, and 

 and April 21, 2008; 

 Entered into force April 21, 2008.
Amended and Restated 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 

First Amendment to the WCI Communities, Inc. 

Amended and Restated 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan 

This First Amendment to the WCI Communities, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan (this “Amendment”) is
adopted as of September 22, 2016 (the “Amendment Date”) by WCI Communities, Inc. (the “Company”) for the purpose of amending the WCI Communities, Inc. Amended and Restated 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan (as it
may be amended from time to time, the “Plan”). Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 

WHEREAS, the Company currently maintains the Plan; 

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan pursuant to Article 9 of the Plan; and 

WHEREAS, this Amendment, together with the Plan (as of immediately prior to the Amendment Date), constitutes the entire Plan as amended
through the Amendment Date. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the Amendment Date, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Section 8.3 of the Plan is hereby removed and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

8.3 Form of Payment. Payment of LTIP Awards may be made in shares of Common Stock; provided, however, in the event the Payment
Event is due to a Change in Control of WCI, (a) pursuant to that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger between WCI and Lennar Corporation dated as of September 22, 2016 (the “Lennar MA”), payment shall be made as set forth
under the terms of the Lennar MA applicable to the treatment of LTIP Awards, or (b) other than pursuant to the Lennar MA, payment shall be made in cash based on the value of shares of Common Stock for purposes of calculation of consideration in
such Change in Control (as determined by the Committee in its discretion). 
 2. Except as set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms. 
 3. This Amendment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with and governed by the
laws of the State of Florida. 
 * * * * * 







 Executed and effective as of the Amendment Date. 

 

			
	WCI COMMUNITIES, INC.
	
	 /s/ Keith Bass

		
	By:	 	Keith Bass
		
	Its:	 	President and Chief Executive Officer


 Signature Page to First Amendment to the WCI Communities, Inc. 

Amended and Restated 2013 Long Term Incentive Plan
Before the First Division,

September 6, 1945

No. 50458.

#### Petition 6460-R of Reedy Forwarding Co. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

From the testimony it appeared that the undervaluation was due to a typographical error rather than lack of knowledge of market value. Upon the record it was held that the petitioner did not conceal from the appraiser or other officials any information relevant to this matter, and that there was no intention to .deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise or defraud the revenue of the United States. The petition was therefore granted.
18.07
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-09-298-CV

IN RE CECIL DARRELL LONG 	RELATOR

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed as moot.  Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed as moot.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  CAYCE, C.J.; LIVINGSTON and GARDNER, JJ. 

DELIVERED:  October 2, 2009
No. 59554.

protest 243918-K (New York).

#### St. Stephen’s Rectory *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Steven Williams, Sr.,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1167 LKK PAN P

vs. Order

Sgt. Nuchols, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoApril 11, 2005, plaintiff requested an extension of time to

submit an in forma pauperis application. Good cause appearing,

plaintiff’s request is granted and the deadline is extended for

30 days from the date this order is signed.

So ordered.

Dated: April 14, 2005

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

PETER A. NOWINSKI

Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01167-LKK -EFB Document 6 Filed 04/19/05 Page 1 of 1