alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STEPHEN L. DAVIS (State Bar No. 149817) 

MARK R. LEONARD (State Bar No. 219186) 

DAVIS & LEONARD, LLP 

8880 Cal Center Drive 

Suite 180 

Sacramento, California 95826 

Telephone: (916) 362-9000 

Fax: (916) 362-9066 

E-mail: mleonard@davisandleonard.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Jason Isaksen 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JASON ISAKSEN, an individual, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

MAZU PUBLISHING COMPANY, an Oregon 

Corporation, and MATTHEW GAGNON, an 

individual, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO. CIV S-04-2240 WBS CMK 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH 

PREJUDICE PLAINTIFFS’ COMPLAINT 

AGAINST DEFENDANTSAND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through 

their designated counsel, as provided by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) that 

plaintiff Jason Isaksen dismisses the above-captioned action with prejudice. 

// 

// 

// 

// 

// 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02240-WBS-CMK Document 48 Filed 04/21/06 Page 1 of 3
2 

 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Dated: April 20, 2006. 

DAVIS & LEONARD, LLP 

/s/ Mark R. Leonard 

Mark R. Leonard 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Jason Isaksen 

 

Dated: April 20, 2006. 

ANTHONY DEGIDIO 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

/s/ Anthony J. DeGidio 

Anthony J. DeGidio 

Attorney for Defendants 

Matthew Gagnon and Mazu Publishing Co. 

Dated: April 20, 2006. 

MALOVOS & MENDOZA, LLP 

/s/ Joanna R. Mendoza 

Joanna R. Mendoza 

Attorney for Defendants 

Matthew Gagnon and Mazu Publishing Co. 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02240-WBS-CMK Document 48 Filed 04/21/06 Page 2 of 3
3 

 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER 

Having considered the above Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, and good 

cause appearing therefor, the Stipulation shall become and hereby is an Order of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 20, 2006

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02240-WBS-CMK Document 48 Filed 04/21/06 Page 3 of 3
Before the Second Division,

October 31, 1947

No. 51994.

#### Sand & Siman *v.*United States,

protests 954677-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VISION SERVICE PLAN,

NO. CIV. S-04-1993 LKK/JFM

Plaintiff,

v.

O R D E R

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

 /

The court is in receipt of the parties’ stipulations to allow

Boys and Girls Club of America, the American Red Cross, and

National Association of Community Health Centers, Inc., a twentyone (21) day extension of time, until Thursday, October 6, 2005,

to produce documents which respond to the subpoena. Having

considered the parties’ stipulations, the court hereby ORDERS as

follows:

1. The Boys and Girls Club of America, American Red Cross and

National Association of Community Health Centers, Inc. are allowed

the requested twenty-one (21) day extension; and

////

Case 2:04-cv-01993-LKK -JFM Document 48 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The deadline for discovery, as set forth in the court’s

Status Order, is EXTENDED for this sole purpose.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: September 19, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01993-LKK -JFM Document 48 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-3271-EM] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Colorado (FEMA-3271-EM), dated January 7, 2007, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

February 12, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an emergency declaration for the State of Colorado is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared an emergency by the President in his declaration of January 7, 2007: 

Cheyenne, Huerfano, and Kiowa Counties for emergency protective measures (Category B), including snow removal, under the Public Assistance program for any continuous 48-hour period during or proximate to the incident period.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA.

 [FR Doc. E7-2948 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
PUBLIC LAW 111–310—DEC 15, 2010 124 STAT. 3293 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6118: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Sept. 28, 29, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 2, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–310 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, in Washington, D.C., as the ‘‘Dorothy I. Height Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DOROTHY I. HEIGHT POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 2 Massachusetts Avenue, NE, in Washington, 

D.C., shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dorothy I. Height 

Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Dorothy I. Height Post Office’’. 

Approved December 15, 2010. 

2 USC 2021 note. 

Dec. 15, 2010 

[H.R. 6118] 


kgrant on DSKHRRP4G1PROD with PUBLAW
Exhibit 32.1 

CERTIFICATION 

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Timothy C. Rodell, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of GlobeImmune, Inc. (the “Company”), and C. Jeffrey Dekker, the Vice President, Finance and Treasurer, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge: 

1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and 

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have set their hands hereto as of the 15th day of August 2014. 

 

| /s/ Timothy C. Rodell                      |   | /s/ C. Jeffrey Dekker            |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
| Timothy C. Rodell                               |   | C. Jeffrey Dekker                     |
| Chief Executive Officer, President and Director |   | Vice President, Finance and Treasurer |

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of GlobeImmune, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 65516.

#### President Novelty & Jewelry Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/26593 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of compass rings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58039, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24(a)

                         AMERIPRISE CERTIFICATE COMPANY
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

City of Minneapolis
State of Minnesota

Each of the undersigned as a director of Ameriprise Certificate Company, a
face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940, hereby constitutes and appoints William F. (Ted) Truscott, Brian J.
McGrane, David K. Stewart, Scott R. Plummer and Christopher O. Petersen or any
one of them, as his or her attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign for him or her in
his or her name, place and stead any and all registration statements and
amendments thereto (with all exhibits and other documents required or desirable
in connection therewith) that may be prepared from time to time in connection
with said Company's existing or future face-amount certificate products--whether
pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Investment
Company Act of 1940 or otherwise--and periodic and other reports, and amendments
thereto, including those on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, as required
pursuant to provisions of applicable federal securities laws, and any necessary
or appropriate filings with states or other jurisdictions, and grants to any or
all of them the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
required or necessary or appropriate in connection with such signatures or
filings.

Signed on this 19th day of February, 2008


/s/ Rodney P. Burwell
-------------------------------------
Name: Rodney P. Burwell


/s/ Jean B. Keffeler
-------------------------------------
Name: Jean B. Keffeler


/s/ Thomas R. McBurney
-------------------------------------
Name: Thomas R. McBurney


/s/ Karen M. Bohn
-------------------------------------
Name: Karen M. Bohn
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ Request for EOT

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRICK R. HOLLEY, Sr.,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. 2:04-cv-2006 MCE PAN P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ FIRST REQUEST

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE AN OPPOSITION TO

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

COMPEL

Defendants’ first request for an extension of time to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s

motion to compel was considered by the Court, and good cause appearing, Defendants’ request is

granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants shall have until May 12, 2006, to file the

opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to compel.

DATED: April 25, 2006. 

holl2006.eot.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-02006-MCE -EFB Document 56 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-7161

FRANK C. BRIDGES, JR.,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

GORDON H. MANSFIELD, Acting Se cretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

William S. Harwood, Jr. , Verrill Dana, LLP, of Portland, Maine, argued for

claimant-appellant.

Michael N. O’Connell , Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil

Division, United States Depa rtment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for

respondent-appellee. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler , Acting Attorney

General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Franklin E. White, Jr. , Assistant Director.

Of counsel on the brief were David J. Barrans , Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and

Ethan G. Kalett , Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington,

DC.

Appealed from: United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Chief Judge William P. Greene, Jr.NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-7161

FRANK C. BRIDGES, JR.,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

GORDON H. MANSFIELD, Acting Secr etary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.



# Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR VETERANS CLAIMS

in CASE NO(S). 04-1245

This CAUSE having been he ard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (SCHALL, BRYSON, AND MOORE, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.



### ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: October 11, 2007 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
No. 54072.

#### Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 125827-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P. (the
Partnership) for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Don R. Wellendorf, Chief Executive Officer of Magellan Midstream Holdings
GP, LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ Don R. Wellendorf                     
|Don R. Wellendorf, Chief Executive Officer
|Date: November 3, 2008                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership
and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL
Before the First Division,

June 25, 1942

No. 47336.

#### Protest 894181-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Plaintiff’s witness testified that in the game of badminton the shuttlecock is batted back and forth with strung racquets, over a net, the object of the game being to keep the shuttlecock in continuous motion off the ground; that the racquets are approximately the length of tennis racquets but of much frailer construction and weigh only about half as much; that the court for playing such games is approximately one-half the size of a tennis court, the markings thereof and the rules of play being similar, although the method of scoring is different; and that the effect of the feathers is to keep the course of the shuttlecock straight and to slow down its motion in order to keep it within the limits of the court, also to give a certain amount of buoyancy. He further testified that badminton can be played with a ball instead of a shuttlecock but that he would not call the article which was received in evidence in this case as exhibit 1 a ball. Exhibit 1 consists of a rounded piece of resilient material with a crown of feathers. From the dictionary definitions of a ball and from the testimony produced the court stated it is obvious that the article at bar does not fall within the definition of a ball and is not a ball within the common meaning of that term. The shuttlecocks in question were therefore hefd not dutiable *directly*under paragraph 1502. In the opinion of the- court the similitude clause in paragraph 1559 cannot be invoked in the determination of the classification of the shuttlecocks at bar for the reason that they are “enumerated” in the act within the meaning of that term as used in the clause. As there appeared to be no dispute that the shuttlecocks in question are composed in chief value of feathers, in the absence of a more specific provision they were held dutiable as articles in chief value of feathers, not specially provided for, at 60 percent under paragraph 1518, as classified. *United States*v. *Cochran*(3 Ct. Cust. Appls. 57, T. D. 32349) and *Powell*v. *United States*(T. D. 46711) cited.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIRECTV, INC., a California

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

WENDELL MCGOWEN,

Defendant.

____________________________/

No. CIV-S-04-2035 MCE/KJM

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND

DISPOSITION

Pursuant to the representations of the attorney for

plaintiff, the court has determined that this case is settled.

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160,

dispositional documents are to be filed on or before September

19, 2005.

///

///

///

///

///

///

///

 

Case 2:04-cv-02035-MCE -KJM Document 14 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the

imposition of sanctions on any and all counsel as well as any

party or parties who cause non-compliance with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 2, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02035-MCE -KJM Document 14 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 2
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Anmore, Inc. for the Quarter Ending September 30, 2005, I, Giorgio Saumat, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Anmore, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that: 

 

1.     Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.     The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, fairly represents in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Anmore, Inc. 

 
| Dated: November 21, 2005 |
|--------------------------|

 

**ANMORE, INC.**

 
| By: | */s/ Giorgio Saumat*Principal Executive Officer andPrincipal Financial Officer |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit
32.2





Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Power &
Light Company (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Michael J. Chesser, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Terry Bassham, as Executive Vice President –
Finance and Strategic Development and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Michael J. ChesserName:
              Title:
            Michael
      J. Chesser
              Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            February
      25, 2010/s/
      Terry BasshamName:
              Title:
            Terry
      Bassham
              Executive
      Vice President – Finance and Strategic Development and Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
            February
      25, 2010





This
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to
liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is
expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such
filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Kansas City Power & Light Company
and will be retained by Kansas City Power & Light Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.