alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Registered
Accounting Firm The Board of Directors
OpenTV Corp.: We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-74026, No. 333-52180, No. 333-42892, No. 333-37196, No. 333-102944 and No. 333-115373) on Form S-8 and
(No. 333-115374) on Form S-3 of OpenTV Corp. of our reports
dated March 15, 2005, with
respect to the consolidated balance sheets of OpenTV Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004
and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and
comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2004, and the related financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2004, which reports appear in the December 31, 2004,
annual report on Form 10-K of OpenTV Corp. Our report dated March 15, 2005, on management's assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, expresses our opinion that
OpenTV Corp. did not maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 because of the
effect of material weaknesses on the achievement of the objectives of
the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph that
states that certain duties within the company's financial group were
not properly segregated, management's review of certain accruals and
detailed schedules prepared in connection with the Company's
financial reporting process was not effective and that the Company
does not have sufficient technical expertise to properly apply
accounting principles to certain non-routine matters. Our report dated
March 15, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of OpenTV Corp. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and
for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, refers to the Company's adoption of Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," as of January 1, 2002, as more fully
described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. /s/ KPMG San Francisco, California
March 15, 2005
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacqueline Winwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
16th day of March, 2011.


/s/ Jacqueline Winwood
--------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based
on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the
registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial reporting.
  /s/ Mark J. DeCesaris

Mark J. DeCesaris
acting Chief Financial Officer
08/0G/201 0 16:1 2 FA X 202493514 2 FA A •* • DM S 0001/00 1

^ as

_Departmen

t ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^-^^Counsel 80 0 Independence Ave , S

W o f Transportatio

n „ , , . _ r i-,r-onc m Washington , D

C 2059 1 Federa l Aviatro n Administratio

n Augus t 4 , 201 0

/ka^Tion dVealc h /-Attorne y lo r

th e Agenc y
cc : Deann aWeidncr , Es q (b y e-mai l only ) ~C 3 • 1 Vick i Leennon , Esq

. . . • Manager , Adjudicatio n Branch , AGC-43 0 Orvill e Wrigh t

Bldg

. (fOBlOA ) o : ii ; FA A Nationa l Headquarter s ^ 80 0 Independenc e Ave. , S W c 5 Washington , D C 2059 1 RE : Reques t

fo r secon dextensio n o f

time t o file Appeal Brief

, I n th e matte r

o f Darb y Aviation , Inc. , FA

A Docke t numbe r CP08SO0026 , DM S 2008-119 2 Dea r Ms

. Leemon : O n Jul y 23 , 2010 , Th

e Agenc y requeste da

n extensio n o f

tim e t o file abrie f

perfectin g th e Agenc y appeal o f

Judg e Bcnkin' s ord.e

r o n Jun e 3 , 2010

. I

n a n Order serve dJul y 23 , 2010 , th e Decisionmaker , throug h hi s delegate dauthority , extende dth e tim e fo r filing th e brie f unti l Augus t

6 , 2010

. O n Augus t

3 , 2010 , th e partie s me t

i n mediatio n o f

acas e simila

r to thi s no w pendin g before th e ] 1 Circuit

. Durin g th e cours e o f th e discussion s i t

becam e apparen t

that settlemen t

o f all th e case s associate dwit h Darb y Aviation , Inc. , includin g thi s one , i s arealisti c possibility

. I

n that regar dth e mediato r

indicate dthat

th e 11 * Circui t

woul dexten dth e tim e fo r Respondent' s brie f

i n that cas e aji daske dthat

th e partie s als o submi t

areques t fo r a n extensio n in ou r

presen t cas e here

. Th e Respondent' s Attomcy , Deann aWeidner , sai d specificall y that

sh e woul djoi n i n thi s reques t to asecon dextensio n o f

lim e fo r submittin g a brie f i n perfectin g th e appeal

. Therefore , I a mrespectfull y requestin g tha t throug h yoLi

r delegatio n yo u provid e th e consen t o f th e FAA decisionmake r

an dpermi t

th e docke t

cler k to serv e alette r

confirmin g th e secon dextensio n o f time fo r th e Agenc y Appea l Brie f o n eac h part y unti l Septembe r

6 , 2010

. I f you hav e an y furthe

r questions , pleas e d o no t

hesitat e t o contac t

m e at (202 ) 267-9676

. Sincerely , ^ ^^^^ ^ ,,,•.•.,.s . .
No. 62595.

#### Fabry Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 330497-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of headboards similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61224, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 29, 2010 

p0129 

Order 

 

January 29, 2010 

139514 

ERIC A. BRAVERMAN, Guardian and 

Conservator of PAMELLA JEAN SMUTZKI, 

a Legally Incapacitated Individual, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139514 

 COA: 291118 

Oakland CC: 2008-090674-CK 

SENTRY INSURANCE, a Mutual Insurance 

Company, DAIRYLAND INSURANCE 

COMPANY, a subsidiary of Sentry Insurance, 

and GARY K. SMITH INSURANCE, a sole 

proprietorship, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Proposed Intervening DefendantAppellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 7, 2009 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
JOURNAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

The following list shows the significant subsidiaries of the Company as of March
9, 2001, their respective states of incorporation and the percentage of voting
securities of each subsidiary owned by its immediate parent. All companies
listed have been included in the consolidated financial statements filed
herewith.

                                                           Percent of Voting
                                        State              Securities Owned
Subsidiary                              of Incorporation   by Registrant
----------                              ----------------   -------------
Journal Sentinel Inc.                      Wisconsin       100% by Registrant
Journal Broadcast Corporation*
   (d/b/a Journal Broadcast Group)          Nevada         100% by Registrant
NorthStar Print Group, Inc.                 Wisconsin      100% by Registrant
Add, Inc.                                   Wisconsin      100% by Registrant
NorLight Telecommunications, Inc.           Wisconsin      100% by Registrant
IPC Communication Services, Inc.*           Michigan       100% by Registrant

-----------------------------------

*Journal Broadcast Corporation has four (4) subsidiaries operating in the United
States and IPC Communications, Inc. has one (1) subsidiary operating in France
and a subsidiary to begin operations in Dublin, Ireland.

On January 1, 2001, a merger took place to combine NorLight Telecommunications,
Inc. and PrimeNet Marketing Services, Inc. PrimeNet Marketing Services, Inc. was
formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Also on January 1, 2001,
Label Products & Design, Inc. merged into NorthStar Print Group, Inc. Label
Products & Design was formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of NorthStar Print
Group, Inc.

The Company has no controlling parent. Twenty-five million nine hundred and
twenty thousand (25,920,000) shares, or ninety percent (90%), of the Company's
issued common stock at March 9, 2001, are owned of record by the Trust. The
right to vote these shares in most instances resides in the unitholders.
Accordingly, the Company is not controlled by the Trust and does not consider it
to be a "parent" of the Company within the meaning of Regulation 12b-2. See Item
12 "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management."

                                       51
Exhibit 32.2 - Certifications

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the quarterly  report of General Steel  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Commission  on May 16, 2005 (the  "Report"),  I, John Chen,  Director  and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         By: /s/ John Chen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John Chen
                                            Director and Chief Financial Officer


DATED: May 16, 2005
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WILLIAM F. HILL, JR., First Lieutenant, U. S. Army, Appellant

20 USCMA 125, 42 CMR 317

No. 23,083

November 6, 1970

*Colonel Daniel T. Ghent*and *Captain Bernard J. Casey*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel David T. Bryant, Major Edwin P. Wasinger, Captain William R. Steinmetz,*and *Captain M. M. O’Dowd, Jr.,*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

We granted review to consider the propriety of the acceptance of the accused’s plea of guilty to larceny and housebreaking, in violation of Articles 121 and 130, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§921 and 930, respectively. For the reasons set out in our opinion in United States v Palos, 20 USCMA 104, 42 CMR 296, decided this date, we conclude there was no error in the acceptance of the accused’s *126plea of guilty. Accordingly, the decision of the United States Army Court of Military Review is affirmed.

Judge Darden concurs.

Ferguson, Judge

(dissenting) :

I dissent.

I disagree with my brothers’ holding in this case that the plea of guilty was properly accepted by the military judge for the reasons set forth in my separate opinion in United States v Palos, 20 USCMA 104, 42 CMR 296 (1970). The military judge’s failure to make a specific finding on the record that the accused knowingly, intelligently, and consciously waived his right against self-incrimination, his right to trial of the facts by a court-martial, and his right to be confronted by the witnesses against him, is, in my opinion, reversible error. Cf. United States v Donohew, 18 USCMA 149, 39 CMR 149 (1969); United States v Fortier, 19 USCMA 149, 41 CMR 149 (1969). Without this specific finding on the record, the record is not verbatim as required by law. See my separate opinion in *Palos,*supra.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0141 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0141

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 April 2007 on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community of a Framework Agreement on a Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Programme in the Russian Federation and of the Protocol on Claims, Legal Proceedings and Indemnification to the Framework Agreement on a Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Programme in the Russian Federation (COM(2006)0665 - C6-0475/2006 - 2006/0227(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0507 - 0507 *

P6_TA(2007)0141

Framework Agreement on a Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Programme in the Russian Federation *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 April 2007 on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion on behalf of the European Community of a Framework Agreement on a Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Programme in the Russian Federation and of the Protocol on Claims, Legal Proceedings and Indemnification to the Framework Agreement on a Multilateral Nuclear Environmental Programme in the Russian Federation (COM(2006)0665 — C6-0475/2006 — 2006/0227(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2006)0665) [1],

- having regard to Articles 181a and 300(2) first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0475/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A6-0126/2007);

1. Approves the conclusion of the Framework Agreement and the Protocol thereto;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of Norway and Russia.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
No. 52602.

protest 131774-K (San Francisco).

#### R. E. Lyte *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It appeared that the goods were subject to the British purchase tax and on entry a duress certificate was filed in which the importer certified that it had entered the merchandise at a value higher than that defined in the tariff act because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal for reappraisement. The collector disregarded said certificate and liquidated upon the entered value on the ground that the certificate was not signed, the signature being in typewriting. Under authority of *Clinton Smullyan Associates*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 7, C. A. D. 363) the court sustained the claim that the liquidation should have been made upon the basis of the value found by the court on appeal to reappraisement (Reap. Dec. 6478), in which it was held that the British purchase tax was no part of the entered value.
Exhibit 31.02

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

         I, Kenneth G.C. Telford, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB/A of Essential Innovations
Technology Corp.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. [omitted];

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  June 23, 2005


/s/ Kenneth G.C. Telford
---------------------------
Kenneth G.C. Telford
Principal Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report of i-CABLE Communications Limited (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to such officer's knowledge:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date:    June 27, 2003                By:   /s/ Stephen T.H. Ng
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Name:   Stephen T.H. Ng
                                           Title:  Chief Executive Officer




                                       By:   /s/ Samuel S.F. Wong
                                           -------------------------------
                                           Name:   Samuel S. F. Wong
                                           Title:  Chief Financial Officer






The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.
No. 61842.

#### Chicago Macaroni Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 211679-K, etc. (New York).

*529Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of condimento similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Paolo Alonge, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 351, C. D. 1886), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 23.2 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-74026, No. 333-52180,No. 333-42892 and No. 333-37196) of OpenTV Corp. of our report dated January 23, 2002, except as to Note 16, which is as of April 8, 2003, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

San Jose, California 

April 8, 2003
Before the First Division,

November 14, 1960

No. 64872.

#### Booth Fisheries Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 59/15806 and 59/23796 (Portland, Maine).

*368Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.