alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 48 (Tuesday, March 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 11369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4454]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2006N-0130]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Food Labeling; Trans Fatty Acids in 
Nutrition Labeling

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Food Labeling; Trans Fatty Acids 
in Nutrition Labeling'' has been approved by the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of the Chief 
Information Officer (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,301-827-4659.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of October 12, 2006 
(71 FR 60157), the agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0515. 
The approval expires on January 31, 2010. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets.

    Dated: March 6, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E7-4454 Filed 3-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
Before the Third Division,

May 9, 1960

No. 64146.

protests 58/24773, etc. (New York).

#### Imported Brands, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel thait the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61245, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10141-10142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-570-868)


Folding Metal Tables and Chairs from the People's Republic of 
China: Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of 
the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laurel LaCivita or Matthew Quigley, 
AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4243 or (202) 482-4551, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On July 27, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') 
published the initiation of the administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on folding metal tables and chairs from the 
People's Republic of China (``PRC''). See Initiation of Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews and Request for Revocation 
in Part, 71 FR 42626 (July 27, 2006). This

[[Page 10142]]

review covers the period June 1, 2005, through May 31, 2006. The 
preliminary results of review are currently due no later than March 2, 
2007.

Extension of Time Limit for Preliminary Results of Review

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended (``the Act''), the Department shall make a preliminary 
determination in an administrative review of an antidumping duty order 
within 245 days after the last day of the anniversary month of the date 
of publication of the order. The Act further provides, however, that 
the Department may extend that 245-day period to 365 days if it 
determines it is not practicable to complete the review within the 
foregoing time period.
    The Department finds that it is not practicable to complete the 
preliminary results of the administrative review of folding metal 
tables and chairs from the PRC within this time limit. Specifically, 
due to complex issues related to the selection of surrogate values, we 
find that additional time is needed to complete these preliminary 
results. Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, 
the Department is extending the time period for completion of the 
preliminary results of this review by 90 days until May 31, 2007.
    This notice is published in accordance with sections 751(a)(3)(A) 
and 777(i) of the Act.

    Dated: March 1, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-4048 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Before the Second Division,

April 28, 1955

No. 59015.

protests 229099-K and 227237-K (New York).

#### H. T. Kennedy Co., Inc., and Daniel F. Young, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Aladdin” rail lubricators and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *H. T. Kennedy Co,, Inc.,*and *Daniel F. Young, Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 68, C. D. 1637), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Terry Bennie, * From the 35th District Court

 of Brown County

 Trial Court No. CV1204119.

Vs. No. 11-17-00094-CV * August 3, 2017

City of Bangs, Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has considered Appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss this 

appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred 

by reason of this appeal are taxed against Terry Bennie.
| 1. | to      the best of my knowledge, the Report fully complies with the requirements      of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | to      the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of Registrant. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| October      20, 2009 | By:    | /S/ ROBERT STEVENS               |
|-----------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                  |   | Robert      Stevens              |
|                  |   | Chief      Executive Officer and |
|                  |   | Chief      Financial Officer     |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SC1 17070503.1 1

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

Kurt A. Kappes (State Bar No.: 146384) 

Robert B. Milligan (State Bar No.: 217348) 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2350 

Sacramento, California 95814-4428 

Telephone: (916) 448-0159 

Facsimile: (916) 558-4839 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

Plaintiff Alina Garcia and Defendant Protective Life Insurance Company (successor in 

interest to Interstate Assurance Company) have reached a resolution of this case, including 

Garcia’s claims against Defendant Joyce Francis, who has not appeared in the action. Garcia and 

Protective Life agree to dismiss this action in its entirety with prejudice, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 

41(a). Each party shall bear its own fees and costs in the action. 

// 

// 

ALINA GARCIA,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

INTERSTATE ASSURANCE COMPANY, 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, JOYCE FRANCIS, FAMILY 

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1-

25, inclusive. 

Defendants 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV. S-04-1940 DFL GGH

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE 

Judge: Hon. David F. Levi 

Case 2:04-cv-01940-DFL-GGH Document 36 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SC1 17070503.1 2

The parties seek the Court’s approval of the dismissal of this action with prejudice, 

through the order below. 

DATED: 

By 

Michael Babitske 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ALINA GARCIA 

DATED: May 15, 2006 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 

By 

Kurt A. Kappes 

Attorneys for Defendant 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Date: 5/12/2006 

______________________________ 

DAVID F. LEVI 

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01940-DFL-GGH Document 36 Filed 05/15/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

KATHRYN JEANE PASHUCK, EXECUTRIX 

UNDER WILL OF NELLI CZAJKOWSKY 

AKA ANASTASIA NELLIE CZAJKOWSKY, 

DECEASED

v.

ANDRE TYLER, KEVIN RAVENELL, 

AMIYR A. MUHAMMAD, AND ADAM 

BEYAH

PETITION OF: ANTHONY B. QUINN, 

ESQUIRE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 520 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V.
(KLM Royal Dutch Airlines) (the "COMPANY") on Form 20-F for the period ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Leo M. van Wijk, President & Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



June 12, 2003




LEO M. VAN WIJK


-----------------------------------
Leo M. van Wijk
President & Chief Executive Officer
Before the Third Division,

March 21, 1945

No. 50062.

#### Protests 990043-G, etc., of H. A. Gogarty, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case 2:04-cv-02375-MCE -JFM   Document 52    Filed 01/27/06   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-24T20:58:52-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Exhibit 13.(a).1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Partner Communications Company Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:




1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: March 22, 2010




By: /s/ David Avner

——————————————

Name: David Avner

Title: Chief Executive Officer




Date: March 22, 2010




By: /s/ Emanuel Avner

——————————————

Name: Emanuel Avner

Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 59003.

protest 244967-K (New York).

#### Theodore B. Smith Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The collector’s memorandum states that “As to item (x) case #4, (collages) the collector would not object to a stip. making same dutiable at 10% par 1547-a-TA 30 and TD 51802.” However, since this claim was not made in the protest, and no evidence in support thereof has been offered or received in evidence, the court was constrained to overrule the protest. *(United States*v. *Strauss & Buegeleisen, 20 C. C.*P. A. 378, T. *D.*46184, and *W. T. Grant Company*v. *United States,*38 C. C. P. A. 57, C. A. D. 440, followed.)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4144]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-739 (Second Review)]


Clad Steel Plate From Japan; Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines,\2\ pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on clad 
steel plate from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or 
recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States 
within a reasonably foreseeable time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioners Jennifer A. Hillman and Irving A. Williamson 
not participating.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on October 2, 2006 (71 FR 
57996), and determined on January 5, 2007, that it would conduct an 
expedited review (72 FR 2554, January 19, 2007).
    The Commission's public report Clad Steel Plate from Japan (Inv. 
No. 731-TA-739) (Second Review), USITC Publication 3907, March 2007) 
will contain the views of the Commission developed during the review.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: March 5, 2007.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-4144 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation for Dismissal and Order Thereon Sanford v. TACO BELL, et. al.

 CIV. S.04-2043 W BS PAN

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SANFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

PRB MANAGEMENT, LLC DBA TACO

BELL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV.S. 04-2043 WBS PAN

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON 

Case 2:04-cv-02043-WBS-PAN Document 10 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation for Dismissal and Order Thereon Sanford v. TACO BELL, et. al.

- 2 - CIV. S.04-2043 W BS PAN

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES:

Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Release between plaintiff, JAMES

SANFORD, and defendants, PRB MANAGEMENT, LLC DBA TACO BELL, the parties

hereby request that all parties be dismissed with prejudice from the above-entitled action.

Dated: June 6, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

___/s/ Lynn Hubbard, III____________

LYNN HUBBARD, III 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: _______________, 2005 DESOUZA LAW OFFICES

_____signature on file_________

JACQUELINE DESOUZA

Attorney for Defendant PRB MANAGEMENT,

LLC DBA TACO BELL

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S04-2043 WBS PAN, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 16, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-02043-WBS-PAN Document 10 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 49181.

#### Protest 999043-G of Max Landau & Co. (New York).

*253Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the documentary evidence produced it was found that an error had been made in computing the weights and that 2,463 pounds more accurately represented the tare of the 50 tubs in question than 2,380 pounds and that, therefore, the net weight is 28,142 pounds rather than 28,225 pounds. The collector was therefore directed to reliquidate entry 703527 accordingly.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Kent A. Murphy, certify that: 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Luna Innovations Incorporated; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: August 13, 2007
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

             CORPORATE PROPERTY ASSOCIATES 16 - GLOBAL INCORPORATED


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Corporate Property Associates
16-Global Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March
31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, John J. Park, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


/s/   John J. Park
      ---------------------------

      John J. Park
      Chief Financial Officer
        5/6/2004
      ---------------------------
      Date


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Corporate Property Associates
16-Global Incorporated and will be retained by Corporate Property Associates
16-Global Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Lpath, Inc. (the “Corporation”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, ScottR. Pancoast, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

 
| Date:  May 15, 2009 |                                        |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------|
|                     | /s/  Scott R. Pancoast                      |
|                     | Scott  R. Pancoast                          |
|                     | President  and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                     |                                        |
|                     | /s/  Gary J.G. Atkinson                     |
|                     | Gary  J.G. Atkinson                         |
|                     | Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lpath, Inc.and will be retained by Lpath, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

This certificationaccompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of Lpath, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933,as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether madebefore or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.

 

----