alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.01

      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14

         I, Jason McDiarmid, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Essential Innovations Technology
Corp.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 16, 2006


/s/ Jason McDiarmid
-----------------------------
Jason McDiarmid
Principal Executive Officer
No. 47382.

#### Protests 997050-G, etc., of Union Brokerage Co. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States (5*Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was hold that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported, and that no addition should have been made for the planing, tonguing, and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated November 3, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-213460) of Smart Trust 279,
comprising Smart Trust, CEFA Select BDC Trust, Series 8.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


November 3, 2016
EXHIBIT 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, an officer and/or
director of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, a North Carolina holding company,
does hereby constitute and appoint Robert A. Reed, John D. Hopkins and J.
Gregory Poole, and each of them, with full power of substitution to appoint
any other Senior Officer, Vice President, Secretary or Assistant Secretary of
the Corporation, as his true and lawful attorney and agent, to do any and all
acts and things and to execute any and all instruments which said attorney and
agent may deem necessary or advisable to enable the said Corporation to comply
with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules,
regulations and requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in
respect thereof, in connection with the filing of the annual report for the
year 1997 on Form 10-K, including specifically, but without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, the power and authority to sign for and on behalf
of the undersigned the name of the undersigned as officer and/or director of
the said Corporation to the Form 10-K or to any amendment thereto filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission and to any instrument or document filed
as part of, as an exhibit to or in connection with, said Form 10-K or
amendment; and the undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm as his own act
and deed all that said attorney and agent (or the substitute) shall do or
cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed these presents this
______ day of February, 1998.



                                     ________________________________(SEAL)
                                     Name:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2007-26818.                 

*Date Filed:*                     January 5, 2007.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     TC23 Africa-South East Asia Resolutions and Fares Tables (Memo 0313) Minutes: TC23 Middle East, Africa TC3 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference (Memo 0321) Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.                 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2007-26819.                 

*Date Filed:*                     January 5, 2007.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*                     TC23/123 Middle East-South East Asia Resolutions and Fares Tables (Memo 0308) Minutes: TC23 Middle East, Africa-TC3 Passenger Tariff Coordinating Conference (Memo 0317) Intended effective date: 1 April 2007.                 

Renee V. Wright, 

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. E7-407 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
August 26, 1959

Reap. Dec. 9500.

#### Empire Plastic Corp. *v.*United States,

Motion by plain tiff.
No. 63062.

#### Meer Corporation *v.*United States,

protests 59/14863(A), 58/22047(A), and 59/1841 (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *B. L. Lemke & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 253, C.D. 1937), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61368.

protest 294729-K (New York).

#### E. Safani *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 6594.

#### STATE, EX REL., CHARLES E. GENDRON vs. DEMOCRATIC PARISH EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ET ALS.

Appeal from the 28th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. John the Baptist, No. 485. Honorable John E. Fleury, Judge.

Guión, Lambremont and Chenet, for plaintiff and appellant.

P. E. Edrington, Jr., L. M. Reynaud, for defendant and appellee.

Per Curiam.

This case presents the same question involved in the matter of State, ex rel., Elfer vs. Parish Democratic Exec*272utive Committee, et als., No. 6590 of our docket, this day decided, and for the reasons therein set' forth,

Opinion and decree, December 22nd, 1915.

The judgment herein is annulled and reversed and it is now decreed that there be judgment in favor of relator herein ordering and commanding the respondents here la to print and cause to be printed the name of relator upon all ballots to- be used .and cast at the primary- election to be held in the Parish of St. John the Baptist on January 25, 1916, as a candidate of the Democratic Party for nomination to the office of Justicá of the Peace, Ward 1, of said Parish, .and to certify relator’s name as such candidate to. the Secretary of State of Louisiana; and it is further decreed that respondents pay the costs of both Courts.

Reversed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned officer of Genesis HealthCare Corporation (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|--------------------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May 30, 2006 |   |   | /s/ George V. Hager, Jr.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|               |   |   |  

 

 

George V. Hager, Jr.Chief Executive Officer

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                              5

<S>                                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                         45,328
<SECURITIES>                                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 261,274
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 (127,000)
<INVENTORY>                                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              183,780
<PP&E>                                                        559,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                                (59,006)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              6,828,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       1,044,007
<BONDS>                                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0
<PREFERRED>                                                         0
<COMMON>                                                       24,160
<OTHER-SE>                                                  4,227,905
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                6,828,733
<SALES>                                                       223,749
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              223,749
<CGS>                                                         124,859
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               3,217,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              239,653
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             13,679
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            (3,371,689)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        (3,371,689)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0
<CHANGES>                                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                               (3,371,689)
<EPS-BASIC>                                                     (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.18)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAbgenix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

May 10, 2005

 

 
|   |   | /s/ WILLIAM R. RINGO                                                                   |   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | William R. Ringo  President and Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer) |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Abgenix, Inc. and will be retained by Abgenix, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Case No. 13,170.

#### SOMERS v. TAYLOE.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 138.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1817.

Evidence — Wkitten Contract — Parol—Demand —Waiver.

1. If a written contract between A. and B., for the delivery of corn, contain allusions to C. and D. tending to show their interest in the contract, parol evidence may be given to show that A. was the agent of C., and that B. was the agent of D., and that the contract was made by A. and B. for and in behalf of their respective-principals; and the contract may be admitted in evidence in an action by C. against D. for the nondelivery of the corn which was the subject of the contract.

2. If the defendant positively refused to deliver the corn according to the contract, such refusal dispensed with the necessity of a demand on the part of the plaintiff, and of proof of averment that he was ready at the landing to receive the corn.

This was a special action of assumpsit, for not delivering corn according to a written contract between Greenlow and Raymond. The declaration avers that Greenlow was the agent of Daniel Somers, and Raymond the agent of John Tayloe.

Mr. Swann, for defendant,

objected to the contract being read in evidence on this declaration. because the agreement does not show the agency of the parties, and no parol evidence can be given to explain the written contract.

Mr. Taylor and Mr. Lee, for plaintiff,

observed that the contract was not under seal, and was offered in connection with the letters of Mr. Tayloe acknowledging the contract as his, and as made with Mr. Somers.

THE COURT (nem. con.) was of opinion that as, in the contract, the corn is said to be tbe com upon Colonel Tayloe’s plantation called “Oaken Brow,” and as there are several other references in the contract to Colonel Tay-loe and Mr. Somers, the plaintiff might give parol evidence of the agency of the parties.

Mr. Swann, for defendant, moved the court to instruct the jury that the plaintiff must prove a demand of the corn.

Mr. Taylor, contra. The defendant, by "his letters of the 12th and 24th of June, declares that he will not deliver it. This absolved the plaintiff from his obligation to demand it.

THE COURT (nem. con.) decided that the-demand was waived by the defendant’s declaration that he would not deliver the com.

One count of the declaration averred that the plaintiff was ready at the landing to receive the corn; and Mr. Swann prayed the court to instruct the jury that, upon that count, it was necessary that the plaintiff should prove that fact.

But

THE COURT

decided that the plaintiff need not prove that averment, if lie proves that the defendant waived the demand, by de-*791daring that he would not deliver the corn If demanded.

Verdict for the plaintiff, $375.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD JAMES WILLARD,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0743 FCD DAD P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges the failure of the Board of

Prison Terms (BPT or Board) to find him suitable for parole at two parole suitability hearings. 

He claims, among other things, that his rights pursuant to the Eighth and Fourteenth

Amendments were violated because the Board disregarded regulations ensuring fair suitability

hearings and instead operated under a policy that all murderers be found unsuitable for parole

(claims IV and VI). Respondent did not address these claims in his answer filed January 5, 2005. 

On December 23, 2004, petitioner filed a motion for discovery. Respondent has not filed an

opposition to this motion. 

Good cause appearing, respondent will be directed to file an opposition to

petitioner’s discovery motion and an amended answer responding to petitioner’s claims

Case 2:04-cv-00743-FCD-DAD Document 18 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

numbered IV and VI, described above. Respondent will also be directed to file a paper copy of

his January 5, 2005 answer, in accordance with Local Rule 5-133(f). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within thirty days from the date of this order, respondent shall file an

opposition to petitioner’s December 23, 2004 motion for discovery and an amended answer

addressing petitioner’s claims that his rights pursuant to the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments

were violated because the Board disregarded regulations ensuring fair suitability hearings and

instead operated under a policy that all murderers be found unsuitable for parole; and

2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, respondent shall file a paper

copy of his January 5, 2005 answer, in accordance with Local Rule 5-133(f).

DATED: June 2, 2005.

DAD:8

will743.o

Case 2:04-cv-00743-FCD-DAD Document 18 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2