alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12

                     FORT JAMES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (A)
                          YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1998

                          (DOLLAR AMOUNTS IN MILLIONS)


                  Pretax income from continuing operations,
                     before minority interest and extraordinary      $  765.8
                     items
                  Add:
                     Interest charged to operations
                                                                        297.1
                     Portion of rental expense representative of
                       interest factor (assumed to be one-third)
                                                                         21.2
                  -----------------------------------------------------------

                        Total earnings, as adjusted                $  1,084.1
                  ===========================================================
                  Fixed Charges:
                     Interest charged to operations                  $  297.1
                     Capitalized interest
                                                                          9.9
                     Portion of rental expense representative of
                       interest factor (assumed to be one-third)
                                                                         21.2
                  -----------------------------------------------------------
                        Total fixed charges                          $  328.2
                  ===========================================================
                  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                     3.30
                  ===========================================================


(a)     In computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings consist of
        income before income taxes, minority interests, extraordinary item, and
        fixed charges excluding capitalized interest. Fixed charges consist of
        interest expense, capitalized interest and that portion of rental
        expense (one-third) deemed representative of the interest factor.
        Earnings and fixed charges also include the Company's proportionate
        share of such amounts for unconsolidated affiliates which are owned 50%
        or more and distributed income from less than 50% owned affiliates.

                                       21
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**





**As
      Adopted Pursuant To**





**Section
      906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Samuel
      F. Occhipinti, Chief Financial Officer of Solomon Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





•  the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





•  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.




By:
            /s/ Samuel F. OcchipintiSamuel
              F. OcchipintiChief
              Financial Officer(principal accounting officer)May 15, 2006
No. 51425.

#### Protests 898464—G, etc., of Julius Kayser & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
62°15'E

61°45'E

61°30°E

61°15'E

ie a4 ] ~
[Fa —
! | tein | x
| es, | a Nee
“ |
| -
2 +4 ee
3. | ln a ee a a a?
st |
I
1 | |
|
| | a
A ~ ¥ oo,
< a, I :
I .
=! l
| :
=) | |
2 | i I
en 1 == $2 == - —|----- -- -!
- ! ! ! :
! | !
| SO ett |
| o | | :
eae | ll |
| On! ;
? Pi ! ‘,
fo | = | ANS
S | = |
=)
°_ Gamelan as = lanai 7 Sa ¢->--~ Se a a C7 a Se
+ | | : \! \
l
| ! 1 4
es a / | )
4! } . Y,
by le
/ | j |’ :
J | 1 | é
| : l
I * us ze Bs
| . |
S | | | i
= veri 3 se a ee a a ne © Mi car arated A Dae Cr mith
3 TS | | 7)
| l | 4
|
l
\ es | | i. 7
i cae i LJ \
gel Eee: . 4
fra = j— | | ; i | |
} "oS | \ YI c%
s lees ».. : 3! aI
=) | Of) | \ _ < I
y i H = L = 4
Ege ae Se a ROS fe Py a | ——-—-----—----}--------} --\----4---—---+-----|-- : |---| 2 -----4-----+-----4--
& | 4
lV : | | \ | |
q | \
| a I | ra
R nia co i: ! 4 pout
0 \ ° as )
\ | ! | : —s
, \ | ae oe
‘ape i 2 ae
2 Ne a~.
3 Me Ig | Be
oO. jae — cee ee eee 22 e222 22 2 Ses eee) eee eee Per ew esse cece cece et eceeee See see e eee ee S22 ee s=s== a SS ae Ae seeeeeqe=—7
oe) 5 8 i re Ssh .
fp, res | NE lc» J { | ~~
Beads | \ r & at :
? AY | \ : LO a ‘
i | \. i, Kh )
| _ ee , I ‘
SS Sean { ! F :
Oo pat: J TM a fn x. |
= iors, psy jan | = !
QO jeeapecso-y--- toofcccocccoc eee ap as | = $—S---- eae -------- Birt ig" fa ag Wp ea |
les ~ ¢ > | ¢ r
ey be oy : 2 : | 7 ‘; o.
aa : | ! ( E | F | . 7
lv | a | ) A { ’
V = . of
I | L. 3 Is {\ = . |
| | | Y ;  Syehe _
| en | f 4 _ oa a
- : | So a ies Ue : ae ! < « Ny
—+—_—— ral ae
S piv tee Wee Ss aaa B Rar. oy [ike soem ania PAS EO Ure fee en ea be =n Fae EE
tO ) Fem N a. } zi ais >
ae) f Cp) yma I | i C % Pal |
j i S Fan} \ os “ % | on ! Ps
, ; I : S
( | se ! tas ot a aie 4
‘ a I I G ; | | I)
| eer 4) N > =i << “I > i
« an} © COC! = i 0 | 1 ~~ 1
eee. og Sl CS N aa:
40) ep) ! = | 2} -
| wa ! \5 | “4 1
8 | : < a
ee A SF 1 ee, SS eee A Be Bare eee egies | SE (ep, PCa re <a ORE CE SE At RR RE a Se Beene | Wis, “nda Rites sey) ss oe ee
a T = : ;
Kp) Q | | I \ \
Oo | |
. 1 | >t
— = : \
| » fe ee |
oe Rites N | te !
Pe REE ! Rape !
A ee | | LA. |
oie | \ | wy | \ I
2 / | 2 | |
S LNoeos oe A Ts | Scanstenk Get bY Saret Peete ore. he ow | ie: So a re
st y, \ K | P yr.
o : . IN Ut. K
- | | ! ot a ee
a“ | = BS i a = ml Mey. y |
. Sve gS 41 Sareea A |
! os S C —_ rug in OO Cy < ra
| ees | : A) iy 4 a |
| — “wh > \ _ > | *., aor
| 49) a) . 5 w Y) I $ I
= te rai | ! ? I L a
=| cn tl é 2 4 4 oh —
Co) en oe 8 i" See a A Rye as Ss Po ha ee + pe ek eae
a) / | : \. ¢ ye |
¢ ‘ I TM~ Re a 1 ; \ |!
: | ; | ~ I é a
l a .} \ tj
f | Lo a \ it
ae s ! \ Se 1
, | ( eh | 'y XY } {
sal i Neb i
S a: ae | jo. | Ss’ S|
S L¢t-—--______ 2 pS aN | fy te ee a ct
NN Ie | 3 ie Laas ix a
oy av 1 =. 1 3 |
el, 2 .
7 _ ! ic st
S S S S S S S
So So =) So So i=) oS
oO oS © Oo So i=) oO
Lo wT op) N = © o>
N N NK KR he — Zo)
isp) > ise) ip) “> ise) isp)

33°45'N
33°30'N

10 KILOMETERS

EXPLANATION

Peak

&

L_]
CL]

Road
—-— Stream, mostly intermittant

5 MILES

Image quadrant or tile

Image subarea

City, town, or village
—- Province boundary

Ty
**Attachment D**  **Work She ets used to Calculate Industry**  **Labor Costs** This attachment is available as part of the electronic **docket EPA -**  **HQ -**  **OPP -**  **20 15**  **- 0**  **231** and is part of the ICR’s Supporting Statement . **NAICS: 325300 Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other**  **Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing** Labor Category : Formula Managerial Technical Clerical Unloaded Hourl y Rate 1 = W $57.76 $32.46 $18.18 Benefits Percentage 2 Lb = B/W 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $26.00 $14.61 $8.18 Loaded Hourl y Rate Wb = W + B = W(1+Lb) $83.76 $47.07 $26.36 Overhead Percentage 3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50% Overhead per hour OH = Wb*L o $41.88 $23.54 $13.18 Fully L oaded Hourly Rate Wf = Wb + OH = W + B + OH $125.64 $70.61 $39.55 1. Data Source: BLS http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_325300.htm May 201 3 data NAI CS 325300 - Pesticide, Fertilizer, and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing Standard Occupational Codes: Management: 11 - 0000, Management Occupations Technical: 19 - 0000, Life, Phy sical, and Social Science Occupations Clerical: 43 - 0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations 2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour. 3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency , EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition , EPA - 452 - 02 - 001, January 2002, pg. 2 - 34. The loading for indirect costs is within the range of 20 - 70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

MIHAITA CONSTANTIN,

CASE NO. CIV. S-04-1247 WBS PAN

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S

DEPARTMENT; SHERIFF LOU

BLANAS, individually and in

official capacity as Sheriff

of the Sacramento County

Sheriff’s Department; DEPUTY

C. MASON; DEPUTY PARKER;

DEPUTY MORCK; DEPUTY PAI;

DEPUTY DE LA CRUS; DOES I

through XXX, inclusive,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

STATUS ORDER

After reviewing the parties’ separate status

statements, the court makes the following orders:

I. FURTHER STATUS CONFERENCE

A further status conference is scheduled for April 10,

2006 at 9:00 a.m. At that time, the court will consider a new

scheduling order. 

Case 2:04-cv-01247-WBS-PAN Document 27 Filed 01/17/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

II. FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Plaintiff’s counsel has requested additional time to

prepare his pretrial statement, which was due on December 30,

2005, ten court days before the scheduled pretrial conference. 

L.R. 16-281 (E.D. Cal. 1997). In support of this request,

plaintiff’s counsel notes that the plaintiff in this action died

on May 14, 2005 and counsel has not yet been retained by

plaintiff’s estate to pursue the decedent’s claim. Complicating

matters further, plaintiff’s wife, Gabriela Constantin, resides

in Romania and communication with her, which requires the use of

an interpreter, has been “non-existent.” Lucian Stanciu, who has

power of attorney over investigations concerning plaintiff’s

death, has filed a petition for status as Special Administrator

of the estate. However, plaintiff’s counsel has not yet received

an order of appointment establishing the estate’s representative.

In light of these circumstances, the court hereby

vacates the Pretrial Conference scheduled for January 17, 2006. 

A new date will be assigned at the April 10, 2006 status

conference.

III. TRIAL SETTING

The court also hereby vacates the Trial scheduled for

March 14, 2006 for the same reasons explained above. A new date

will be assigned at the April 10, 2006 status conference.

DATED: January 13, 2006

Case 2:04-cv-01247-WBS-PAN Document 27 Filed 01/17/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

Case 2:04-cv-01247-WBS-PAN Document 27 Filed 01/17/06 Page 3 of 3
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4575 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to require the Assistant Secretary 

for Aging to make available to States, area agencies on aging, and 

service providers information and technical assistance to support the 

provision of evidence-informed practices that are likely to improve health 

outcomes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 18, 2024 

Mr. BRAUN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Older Americans Act of 1965 to require the 

Assistant Secretary for Aging to make available to 

States, area agencies on aging, and service providers 

information and technical assistance to support the provision of evidence-informed practices that are likely to 

improve health outcomes, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Evidence-Informed 

5 Health Promotion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4575 IS

1 SEC. 2. EVIDENCE-INFORMED HEALTH PROMOTION. 

2 (a) FUNCTIONS OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY.—Section 

3 202 of the Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3012) 

4 is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a)(28)— 

6 (A) by inserting ‘‘or, as applicable and ap7 propriate, evidence-informed practices that are 

8 likely to improve health outcomes,’’ after ‘‘serv9 ices,’’; and 

10 (B) by inserting ‘‘and practices’’ after 

11 ‘‘such services’’; and 

12 (2) in subsection (b)(9)(B)— 

13 (A) by inserting ‘‘or, as applicable and ap14 propriate, evidence-informed practices that are 

15 likely to improve health outcomes,’’ after ‘‘serv16 ices programs,’’; and 

17 (B) by inserting ‘‘and practices’’ after 

18 ‘‘such services’’. 

19 (b) DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH PROMOTION

20 SERVICES.—Section 361(a) of the Older Americans Act 

21 of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3030m(a)) is amended— 

22 (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘, or, as 

23 applicable and appropriate, evidence-informed prac24 tices that are likely to improve health outcomes,’’ be25 fore ‘‘and information’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4575 IS

1 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘, and, 

2 as applicable and appropriate, evidence-informed 

3 practices that are likely to improve health out4 comes,’’ before ‘‘in different settings’’. 

5 (c) FALLS PREVENTION AND CHRONIC DISEASE

6 SELF-MANAGEMENT EDUCATION.—Section 411(a) of the 

7 Older Americans Act of 1965 (42 U.S.C. 3032(a)) is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (15), by inserting ‘‘or evi10 dence-informed’’ after ‘‘evidence based’’; and 

11 (2) in paragraph (16), by inserting ‘‘or evi12 dence-informed’’ after ‘‘evidence based’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 9/7/2023 1

Challenging Disqualified Votes 

in a Close Election 

Ron Barber for Congress v. Bennett 

(Cindy K. Jorgenson, D. Ariz. 4:14-cv-2489) 

Before the certification of election results in a close election for 

Congress, the trailing candidate filed a federal complaint challenging the disqualification of some votes. The district judge determined that the plaintiff had not justified federal-court interference 

with election administration. 

Subject: Voting irregularities. Topics: Enjoining certification; 

election errors; provisional ballots; intervention; recusal; case 

assignment. 

Twenty days after the 2014 general election, a candidate for Congress 161 

votes behind the election leader filed a federal complaint in the District of 

Arizona challenging how votes were counted.1 With his complaint, the candidate filed an application for a temporary restraining order and a motion 

for a preliminary injunction.2

 The leading candidate filed a motion to intervene on the following day, November 25,3

 and the court ultimately granted 

this motion.4

Because of Judge David C. Bury’s recusal, the court assigned the case to 

Judge Cindy K. Jorgenson, who set the case for hearing on November 26.5 On 

November 27, Judge Jorgenson denied the candidate relief.6 Considering 133 

votes in seven categories of possibly improper exclusion, she concluded that 

“Plaintiffs point to no case where scattered election-procedure violations regarding a small number of voters was found to raise a constitutional violation warranting a federal court’s entry into the details of the administration 

of an election.”7 On February 20, 2015, she approved the parties’ stipulated 

dismissal without prejudice.8

After a recount, the plaintiff’s opponent was declared the winner by 167 

votes.9

1. Complaint, Rob Barber for Congress v. Bennett, No. 4:14-cv-2489 (D. Ariz. Nov. 24, 

2014), D.E. 1; see Rob O’Dell, Barber Sues to Count 133 Votes in Dist. 2 Race, Ariz. Republic, 

Nov. 25, 2014, at A9. 

2. Motion, Rob Barber for Congress, No. 4:14-cv-2489 (D. Ariz. Nov. 24, 2014), D.E. 2. 

3. Intervention Motion, id. (Nov. 25, 2014), D.E. 11. 

4. Minutes, id. (Nov. 26, 2014), D.E. 26; Transcript at 4, id. (Nov. 26, 2014, filed Dec. 2, 

2014), D.E. 30. 

5. Amended Order, id. (Nov. 26, 2014), D.E. 24 (correcting the case caption); Order, id.

(Nov. 25, 2014), D.E. 14; Recusal, id. (Nov. 24, 2014), D.E. 8. 

6. Opinion, id. (Nov. 27, 2014), D.E. 27, 2014 WL 6694451; see Court Rejects Incumbent’s 

Bid on Ballot Count, N.Y. Times, Nov. 28, 2014, at A21. 

7. Opinion, supra note 6, at 11. 

8. Order, Rob Barber for Congress, No. 4:14-cv-2489 (D. Ariz. Feb. 20, 2015), D.E. 34. 

9. See Rebekah L. Sanders, McSally Wins Recount in Bitter House Race, Ariz. Republic, 

Dec. 18, 2014, at A3.
Before the First Division,

June 26, 1940

No. 44027.

#### Protest 975936-G of Iwai & Co., Ltd. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the sample it was found that the merchandise falls squarely within the definition of translucent and that it is not transparent. On the record it was held dutiable at 40 cents per pound under paragraph 31 (b) (1) as claimed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KIET ANH TRAN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1840 MCE DAD P

vs.

W.J. SULLIVAN, Warden, et al.,

 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On April 27, 2005, petitioner filed a reply to respondents’ answer. It does not

appear that petitioner served the reply on respondents. Petitioner will be required to file a proof

of service reflecting the date on which he mailed a copy of his reply to respondents’ counsel.

Respondents request that the court take judicial notice of state court transcripts

lodged in the habeas proceedings of petitioner’s codefendant, Nhat Nguyen. The docket for

Nguyen v. Kane, case No. CIV S-04-1829 GEB JFM P, reveals that the case was filed one day

prior to the filing of this case; the respondents in that case filed their answer on December 2,

2004, and the petitioner filed his reply on January 5, 2005. Both cases are now submitted for

decision. It is likely that the state court record will be needed by more than one judge, or more

than one court, simultaneously. For that reason, respondents will be directed to lodge a duplicate

set of the transcripts in this case.

Case 2:04-cv-01840-MCE -DAD Document 17 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner is granted thirty days to file a proof of service showing that he

mailed a copy of his reply to respondents’ counsel; and

2. Respondents are granted sixty days to lodge a complete set of the state court

transcripts for use in this case.

DATED: May 24, 2005.

DAD:13

tran1840.recs

Case 2:04-cv-01840-MCE -DAD Document 17 Filed 05/25/05 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 5,301.

#### GELL et al. v. JACOBS.

[Cited in Ogden v. Saunders. 12 Wheat. (25 U. S.) 2SU. See Case No. 5,420.)
No. 57704.

#### Hudson Shipping Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 208323-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the papers disclosed that more than 60 days had elapsed after liquidation before the protest was filed. In view of the provisions of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the protest was dismissed.
**Exhibit      10.6**

**JOINDER      AGREEMENT**

|         |                                                         |                                                             |
|--------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|         | **DEBTOR:** SOLOMON                  TECHNOLOGIES, INC. |
|    |                                                    |                                                        |
|         | By:                                                | /s/ Peter              W.              DeVecchis, Jr.  |
|         | Name:              Peter W. DeVecchis, Jr.                   |
|         | Title:              President                           |

|         |                                                                                                                   |                                            |
|--------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------|
|         | **INVESTOR:**                                                                                                          |
|         |                                                                                                                   |
|         | MERIDEN                COOPER CORPORATION401K                PROFIT SHARING PLAN, JOSEPH                COOPER TRUSTEE |
|    |                                                                                                              |                                       |
|         | By:                                                                                                          | /s/ Joseph              Cooper   |
|         | Name:              Joseph Cooper                                                                                       |
|         | Title:              Trustee                                                                                       |

----
No. 46123.

#### Protests 796839-G/84959, etc., of Marshall Field & Co. et al. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Essential Innovations Technology
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jason McDiarmid, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Jason McDiarmid
---------------------------
Jason McDiarmid
Chief Executive Officer
June 13, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.