alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 42 (Monday, March 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9762]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3760]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at http://www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 30, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. Community Holding Company of Florida, Inc., Miramar Beach, 
Florida; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of 
the voting shares of Community Bank, Destin, Miramar Beach, Florida (in 
organization).
    2. CNBS Financial Group, Inc., to become a bank holding company by 
acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Community National Bank 
of the South (in organization), both of Lake Mary, Florida.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 28, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-3760 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2004, of El Paso Production Holding Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, D. Mark Leland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify
(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ D. Mark Leland
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        D. Mark Leland
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)

                                        November 19, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Production Holding Company and will be retained by El Paso
Production Holding Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES L. DAVIS a.k.a.,

MICHAEL L. HOLMES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1390 LKK PAN P

vs.

TERESA A. SCHWARTZ,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01390-LKK -EFB Document 21 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s April 24, 2006, motion

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: May 4, 2006.

/mp/004

davi1390.31

Case 2:04-cv-01390-LKK -EFB Document 21 Filed 05/05/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41964

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

BRYAN N. MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 827

Filed: November 25, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Canyon County. Hon. George A. Southworth, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of four years, for felony driving under the influence, affirmed. 

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Kimberly E. Smith, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Russell J. Spencer, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Bryan N. Mendoza pled guilty to felony driving under the influence. I.C. §§ 18-8004, 

18-8005. In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed including an 

allegation that he was a persistent violator. The district court sentenced Mendoza to a unified 

term of ten years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years. Mendoza filed an I.C.R 

35 motion, which the district court denied. Mendoza appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Mendoza’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
No. 66852.

#### Winter, Wolff & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/11216 and 61/18157 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sterilized blue collar pin nails and electrogalvanized collar pin nails, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
DeFazio et al., v. Hollister, Inc., et al., CIV. S 04-1358 WBS GGH 

Page 1 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Lynn Hubbard III (SBN 69773) 

Scottlynn J Hubbard IV (SBN 212970) 

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD 

12 Williamsburg Lane 

Chico, California 95926 

Telephone: (530) 895-3252 

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244 

Attorneys for plaintiffs Jim DeFazio, Theresa Beetham, Brenda Dimaro, DeLane 

Humphries, Hallie Lavick, Michael McNair, Sonya Pace, Judy Seay, Nancy 

Russell Stanton, and Cindy Wirth 

United States District Court 

Eastern District of California 

James DeFazio, et al., 

 Plaintiffs, 

 vs. 

Hollister, Inc., et al., 

 Defendants. 

_____________________________

and consolidated cases. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV. S-04-1358 WBS GGH 

Order Denying Leave for Attorneys 

Scottlynn and Lynn Hubbard to 

Appear Telephonically at October 19, 

2009 Final Pre-Trial Conference. 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 581 Filed 10/16/09 Page 1 of 2
DeFazio et al., v. Hollister, Inc., et al., CIV. S 04-1358 WBS GGH 

Page 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

Upon reviewing and considering Plaintiffs’ ex parte application 

(“Application”) for leave for attorneys Scottlynn Hubbard and Lynn Hubbard to 

appear telephonically at the October 19, 2009 Pretrial Conference, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs’ Application is hereby DENIED, 

without prejudice to counsel asking the Tax Court to appear telephonically at 

the hearing in that matter. 

DATED: October 16, 2009 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 581 Filed 10/16/09 Page 2 of 2
No. 64887.

#### Chemo Puro Mfg. Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/3833 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Before the Third Division,

May 6, 1948

No. 52305.

protests 923060-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*312Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

September 30, 2015

No. 04

- 15

- 00366

- CV

Juan Miguel MATA

, Appellant

v.

Maria Elena MATA

, Appellee

From the County Court

, Dimmit County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2714

Honorable Amado J. Abascal III , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on September 30, 2015

.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 30th day of September, 2015

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 11, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 11, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0067. JUSTIN NICKSON v. EXPRESS SERVICES INC. et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2018CV830
No. 53572.

protest 149282-K (New York).

#### Wilson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of “ox-gall concentrate and/or sheep-gall concentrate” the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
June 1, 2015 

Mr. Jeff Frommer 

Malka Media Group 

51 Harrison St 

Hoboken, NJ 07030 

Dear Mr. Frommer: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your April 30, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1351), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
Before the First Division,

April 10, 1946

No. 51005.

#### Protest 98540-K of Judson Sheldon Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the beef-liver extract passed upon in *United States*v. *Judson Sheldon Corp.*(33 C. C. P. A. 73, C. A. D. 318). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 as claimed.
No. 46726.

#### Protest 969127-G of Wm. Shaland (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of jump sticks or trick paddles in chief value of wood the claim at 33% percent under paragraph 412 was sustained, following Abstract 44028.
No. 58046.

protests 134770-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of internal-combustion engines similar in all material respects to the articles involved in *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. It was held that the value of the items involved is the percentage of the appraised value of said power saws, as noted in green ink on the invoices by the examiner.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 46 (Friday, March 9, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4173]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 2, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. BlackRidge Financial, Inc., Fargo, North Dakota , to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of BlackRidgeBANK, Fargo, North Dakota, a 
de novo bank.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (W. Arthur Tribble, Vice 
President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:
    1. Woodforest Financial Group, Inc., The Woodlands, Texas; to 
acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Olympic Savings, SSB, 
Refugio, Texas. Upon consummation, Woodforest Final Group, Inc., will 
convert Olympic Bank into a federal savings bank and change its name to 
Woodforest Bank, FSB, Refugio, Texas, and thereby engage in owning and 
operating a savings and loan association, pursuant to section 
225.28(b)(4)(ii) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 5, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-4173 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
---

Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flatbush Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Jesus R. Adia, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John S. Lotardo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.








/s/ Jesus R. AdiaJesus R. AdiaPresident andChief Executive Officer/s/ John S. LotardoJohn S. LotardoExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer








Date: August 16, 2010
No. 6595.

#### STATE, EX REL., ADELARD WEBRE, vs. DEMOCRATIC PARISH EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, ET ALS.

Appeal from the 28th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. John the Baptist, No. 486. Honorable John E. Fleury, Judge.

Guión, Lambremont and Chenet, for plaintiff and appellant.

P. E. Edrington, Jr., L. M. Bevnaud, for defendant and appellee.

*273Opinion and decree, December 22nd, 1915.

Per Curiam.

This case presents the same question involved in the matter of State, ex rel., Elfer vs. Parish Democratic Executive Committee, et als., No. 6590 of our docket, this day decided, and for the reasons therein set forth,

The judgment herein is annulled and reversed and it is now decreed that there be judgment in favor of relator herein ordering and commanding the respondents lierem to print and cause to be printed the name of relator upon all ballots to- be used and cast at the primary election to be held in the Parish of St. John the Baptist on January 25, 1916, as a candidate of the Democratic Party for nomination to the office of Police Juror, Ward 2, of said Parish, and to certify relator’s name as such candidate to the Secretary of State of (Louisiana; and it is further decreed that respondents pay the costs of both Courts.

Reversed.
Exhibit 23.1.b

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-97263 and 333-114486 on Form S-3, and Registration Nos. 333-120172 and 33-45618 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 8, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Great Plains Energy Incorporated and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the adoption of a new accounting standard and revisions made to the consolidated statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003) and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Great Plains Energy Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 8, 2006
Case No. 13,181.

#### The SOUTH AMERICAN.

[See Case No. 14,311.]