alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (Nos. 33-00175, 33-16187, 33-00176, 2-76657, 2-91931, 33-16188,
33-38361, 2-40012, 2-87193, 2-61721, 2-89418, 33-38360, 33-38361, 33-52760,
33-52758, 33-52756, 33-52762, 333-16113, 333-56119 and 333-62759) and Forms S-3
and S-3/A (Nos. 333-46329, 333-56733, 333-61741 and 333-66937) of Keane, Inc.
and in the related Prospectus' of our report dated March 13, 2000, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Keane, Inc. included in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,1999.

                                                         /s/ Ernst and Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 23, 2000
BEFORE THE THIRD DIVISION,

December 2, 1954

No. 58552.

protests 182088-K, etc. (New York).

#### Dreyfus Ashby & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S EL EVENTH CI RCUI T APRI L 5, 2011 J OHN L EY CL ERK [ D O N O T P U B L I S H ]

I N T H E U N I T E D S T A T E S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S

F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C I R C U I T

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ N o

. 1 0

- 1 2 1 1 6 N o n
- A r g u m e n t C a l e n d a r

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ D

. C

. D o c k e t N o

. 1 : 0 9

- c r
- 2 0 5 4 5

- A J

- 1

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e ,

v e r s u s

J O S E C A R R E N O ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A p p e a l f r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f F l o r i d a

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ( A p r i l 5 , 2 0 1 1 )

B e f o r e E D M O N D S O N , W I L S O N a n d B L A C K , C i r c u i t J u d g e s

.
P E R C U R I A M :

H e c t o r F l o r e s , a p p o i n t e d c o u n s e l f o r J o s e C a r r e n o i n t h i s d i r e c t c r i m i n a l

a p p e a l , h a s f

i l e d a m o t i o n t o w i t h d r a w f r o m f u r t h e r r e p r e s e n t a t i o n o f t h e a p p e l l a n t ,b e c a u s e c o u n s e l b e l i e v e s t h a t t h e a p p e a l i s w i t h o u t m e r i t

. C o u n s e l h a s f i l e d a b r i e f

p u r s u a n t t o A n d e r s v

. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 , 8 7 S

. C t

. 1 3 9 6 , 1 8 L

. E d

. 2 d 4 9 3
( 1 9 6 7 )

.
O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d r e v e a l s t h a t c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t o f

t h e r e l a t i v e m e r i t o f t h e a p p e a l i s c o r r e c t

. B e c a u s e i n d e p e n d e n t e x a m i n a t i o n o f t h e

e n t i r e r e c o r d r e v e a l s n o a r g u a b l y m e r i t o r i o u s i s s u e s o f m e r i t , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n t o

w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , a n d C a r r e n o ’ s c o n v i c t i o n a n d s e n t e n c e a r e A F F I R M E D

.

2
Case Mb. 9,790.

#### MORDECAI et al. v. The MARY EDDY.

District Court, D. South Carolina.

Maritime Lien — Definition — Distinguished from Equitable Lien.

[MAGRATH, District Judge,

cites from The. Young Mechanic, Case No. 18,180, the remark by Judge Curtis wherein he distinguished a maritime from an equitable lien, and adopted the definition by Pothier of an hypothecation, as an accurate description of a maritime lien under our law, — “the right which a creditor has in a thing of another, which right consists in the power to cause that thing to be sold in order to have the debt paid out of the price,”— and adds that a maritime lien, in general, gives no right to the creditor to take possession; that is executed by the suit in rem.]

[Nowhere reported: opinion not,now accessible. The above statement of the point determined was taken from Cohen’s Adm. Law, 202.]
No. 50478.

#### Protests 8135-K/88815, etc., of American Express Co. et al. (Chicago, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 51997.

#### Wimelbacher & Rice et al. *v.*United States,

protests 9615-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0139 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0139

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 April 2007 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Multilateral Agreement between the Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, the European Community, the Republic of Iceland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Kingdom of Norway, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) (COM(2006)0113 - C6-0218/2006 - 2006/0036(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0506 - 0506 *

P6_TA(2007)0139

Multilateral Agreement on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 April 2007 on the proposal for a Council decision on the conclusion of the Multilateral Agreement between the Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Bulgaria, the Republic of Croatia, the European Community, the Republic of Iceland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Kingdom of Norway, Serbia and Montenegro, Romania and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo on the Establishment of a European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) (COM(2006)0113 — C6-0218/2006 — 2006/0036(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2006)0113) [1],

- having regard to Article 80(2), in conjunction with Article 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, and Article 300(4) of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0218/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A6-0060/2007);

1. Approves the conclusion of the Agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Republic of Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Republic of Croatia, the Republic of Iceland, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, the Republic of Montenegro, the Kingdom of Norway, the Republic of Serbia and the United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
No. 49654.

#### Protest 58453-K of M. Barbanell, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel sole crepe ■rubber similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *F. Lester Kittle, Inc.*(31 C. C. P. A. 233, C. A. D. 276) was held entitled to free entry as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT

(Section 906 Certification)

Thomas E. Vessey and Beth Sanders hereby certify as follows:

1. They are the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of 1st Centennial Bancorp.

2. The Form 10-K of 1st Centennial Bancorp for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o (d)) and the information contained in the report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 1st Centennial
Bancorp.



|                     |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: March 06, 2008 |  | /s/    Thomas E.
Vessey                  
|                     |  | Thomas E. Vessey, Chief Executive Officer
|                     | 
|Date: March 06, 2008 |  | /s/    Beth
Sanders                      
|                     |  | Beth Sanders, Chief Financial Officer
Case No. 15,076.

#### UNITED STATES v. FAULBREE.

[See Case No. 3,393.]
No. 50468.

#### Protests 103203-K/ 91360, etc., of Grow & Cuttle, Inc., et al. (Chicago and Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**





**As
      Adopted Pursuant To**





**Section
      906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Peter
      W. DeVecchis, President of Solomon Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), certify,
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, that:





• the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





•  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.





By:
            /s/ Peter
                W. DeVecchis, Jr.Peter
                W. DeVecchis, Jr.President(principal executive officer)May 15, 2006
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 445 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final rule relating to 

removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears 

from the Federal list of endangered and threatened wildlife, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2023 

Ms. LUMMIS (for herself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. DAINES, and Mr. 

RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to reissue a final 

rule relating to removing the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem population of grizzly bears from the Federal list 

of endangered and threatened wildlife, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Grizzly Bear State 

5 Management Act of 2023’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 445 IS

1 SEC. 2. REISSUANCE OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO GREAT2 ER YELLOWSTONE ECOSYSTEM POPULATION 

3 OF GRIZZLY BEARS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall reissue the final rule entitled ‘‘Endangered and 

7 Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Removing the Greater 

8 Yellowstone Ecosystem Population of Grizzly Bears From 

9 the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife’’ 

10 (82 Fed. Reg. 30502 (June 30, 2017)), without regard 

11 to any other provision of law that applies to the issuance 

12 of that final rule. 

13 (b) NO JUDICIAL REVIEW.—The reissuance of the 

14 final rule described in subsection (a) (including this sec15 tion) shall not be subject to judicial review. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2008010EN.01002201.xml

| 15.1.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 10/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 10/22

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on statutory plates and inscriptions for motor vehicles and their trailers, and their location and method of attachment’

COM(2007) 344 final — 2007/0119 (COD)

(2008/C 10/07)

On 13 July 2007 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 438th plenary session of 26 and 27 September 2007 (meeting of 26 September), with 165 votes in favour and 8 abstentions, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 26 September 2007.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
Before the Third Division,

August 8, 1944

No. 49662.

#### Protests 89464-K, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is the same as that passed upon in *Richardson*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 6, C. D. 823), the protests were sustained as to the claim made.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned officer or director of
Kinder Morgan Inc., a Kansas corporation, (the "Company"), hereby constitutes
and appoints Joseph Listengart and C. Park Shaper, and each of them (with full
power to each of them to act alone), the undersigned's true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, for the undersigned and on the undersigned's behalf
and in the undersigned's name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to
sign, execute and file with the Securities and Exchange Commission an amendment
to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2000, together with all amendments thereto, with all exhibits and any and
all documents required to be filed with respect thereto, including a Form S-3,
with any regulatory authority, granting unto said attorneys, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises in order to
effectuate the same as fully to all intents and purposes as the undersigned
might or could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or either of them, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue thereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereto signed this power of
attorney this 20th day of April, 2000.



/s/ William V. Morgan                   /s/ Ted A. Gardner
-------------------------------         -------------------------------
William V. Morgan                       Ted A. Gardner

/s/ Richard D. Kinder                   /s/ William J. Hybl
-------------------------------         -------------------------------
Richard D. Kinder                       William J. Hybl

/s/ C. Park Shaper                      /s/ Edward Randall, III
-------------------------------         -------------------------------
C. Park Shaper                          Edward Randall, III

/s/ Edward H. Austin, Jr.               /s/ Fayez Sarofim
-------------------------------         -------------------------------
Edward H. Austin, Jr.                   Fayez Sarofim

/s/ Charles W. Battey                   /s/ H.A. True, III
-------------------------------         -------------------------------
Charles W. Battey                       H.A. True, III

/s/ Stewart A. Bliss
-------------------------------
Stewart A. Bliss
# 

# BILL OF COSTS

## TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, TENTH DISTRICT, AT WACO

No. 10-13-00392-CV

**Stuart Fetter**

**v.**

**Marshall Brown, Allison Madison and Lauren Wilson**

(No. 2011-1908-5 IN 414th District Court OF McLennan COUNTY)

**Balance of costs owing to the Tenth Court of Appeals, Waco, Texas:  0.00**

***Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.***

I, **SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK** OF THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

**IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF,**witness my hand and the Seal of the **COURT OF APPEALS**for the Tenth District of Texas, this March 24, 2015.

SHARRI ROESSLER, CLERK

By:___________________________

Nell Hegefeld, Deputy Clerk
No. 61370.

protest 296248-K (New York).

#### Colvin Laboratories, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
Selected Clinical Abbreviations Used in the Evidence Tables

bid		twice daily

BP		benzoyl peroxide

cyp		cyproterone

E		erithromycin

EE		ethinyl estradiol

GI		gastrointestinal

gyn		gynecological

NS		not significant

OTC		over the counter

qd		once a day

qhs		once at bedtime

qid		four times a day

qod		every other day

rbg		retinyl beta-glucuronide

sqrt		square root

sul		sulfur

tfd		fractionated dialyzable transfer factor

tid		three times a day

tet		tetracycline

tret		tretinoin

VAS		Visual Analogue Scale

wks		week

y/yr		year
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS EUGENE MOORE, No. 2:04-cv-1895-MCE-EFB-PS

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

THE AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY,

INC.; PHILLIP MORRIS INCORPORATED;

R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY;

BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOBACCO 

CORPORATION; BRITISH AMERICAN

TOBACCO CO., LTD.; LIGGET GROUP,

INC.; LIGGET & MYERS, INC.; THE 

COUNCIL FOR TOBACCO 

RESEARCH-U.S.A., INC.; THE TOBACCO 

INSTITUTE, INC.; and LORILLARD 

TOBACCO COMPANY,

Defendants.

________________________________________/

On August 14, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff filed late objections on

September 20, 2006, and they were considered by the undersigned.

///

Case 2:04-cv-01895-MCE -EFB Document 40 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which

objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore

Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982). As

to any portion of the proposed findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the court

assumes its correctness and decides the motions on the applicable law. See Orand v. U.S., 602

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed August 15, 2004, are ADOPTED; 

2. Defendant’s September 15, 2004 motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. Defendant Brown & Williamson is dismissed from this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12(b)(5) for insufficiency of service of process.

DATED: September 27, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01895-MCE -EFB Document 40 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 50473.

#### Protests 57851-K, etc., of Armand Sacer et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801)j which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10509-10510]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP00-632-022]


Dominion Transmission, Inc.; Notice of Compliance Filing

March 2, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 20, 2007, Dominion Transmission, Inc. 
(DTI) tendered for filing its addendum to the 2006 informational fuel 
report filed with the Commission on June 30, 2006 in Docket No. RP00-
632-021.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e383b2c3d31101217101b2d0b0e0e110c0a3e181b0c1d50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcbab9aebfb39290959299af898c8c938e88bc9a998e9fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

[[Page 10510]]

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 9, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-4119 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>