Jump to Navigation


FLRA.gov
                                  
                                  U.S. Federal Labor Relations Authority

                  RSS FEEDS 
Search form

Search
        
        Menu eFilingAvailable Here
                Home

About
    Introduction to the FLRA

Mission

Budget & Performance

Organizational Chart

FLRA Leadership

Press Releases

Public Affairs

FLRA Job PostingsOur Mission

Protecting rights and facilitating stable relationships among federal agencies, labor organizations, and employees while advancing an effective and efficient government through the administration of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.

Feedback about www.FLRA.gov

Let us know what you think about our new and improved website by emailing us at EngagetheFLRA@flra.gov.

Components & Offices
    Components
    The Authority

Office of the General Counsel

The Federal Service Impasses PanelOffices
    Office of Administrative Law Judges

Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Office (CADRO)

Office of Case Intake and Publication

Office of the Executive Director

Office of Inspector General

Office of the SolicitorIs the FLRA hiring?

Find a listing of all of the FLRA's current job openings.

Contact Us

Find a listing of FLRA contacts that you can call for more information.

Case Types
    File a Case

Unfair Labor Practice

Representation

Arbitration

Negotiability

Negotiation Impasse

Other TypesReady to file a case?

Find everything you need to know about filing a case with the FLRA.

Decisions
    Authority Decisions

Administrative Law Judges Decisions

Federal Service Impasses Panel Decisions

Solicitor's Briefs and Court Decisions

Archival Decisions, Legislative History, & Foreign Service Decisions

Quarterly Digest of Authority DecisionsQuarterly Digest of Authority Decisions

Case digests provide a brief synopsis of the most pertinent principles in merits decisions issued by the Authority.

Archival Decisions

Find historical decisions of the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Labor-Management Relations and the Federal Labor Relations Council, as well as Foreign Service Labor Relations Board decisions.

Legislative History

View the legislative history of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, the Civil Service Reform Act, and the Foreign Service Act.

Resources & Training
    Resources
    Quarterly Digest of Authority Decisions

The Statute & Regulations

Information by Case Type

Policy Statements

Guides & Manuals

Forms & ChecklistsTraining
    Upcoming FLRA Training

Training Contacts

FLRA on YouTube

Course Materials

Video Training

Customer FeedbackFLRA Training on YouTube

Watch free online FLRA trainings on our Youtube channel and don’t forget to subscribe to receive updates on new videos. You are here Home Decision on Request for General Statement of Policy and Guidance
 Decision on Request for General Statement of Policy and Guidance
          
                              
          
          
        
        [ v03 p334 ]
 03:0334(53)PS
 
 The decision of the Authority follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 3 FLRA No. 53
 
                                            Case No. 0-PS-11
 
          DECISION ON REQUEST FOR GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY AND
                                 GUIDANCE
 
    AS PREVIOUSLY ANNOUNCED, /1/ THE AUTHORITY RECEIVED A REQUEST FROM
 THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES (AFGE) THAT THE
 AUTHORITY ISSUE A GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY OR GUIDANCE AS TO THE
 OBLIGATION TO NEGOTIATE DURING THE TERM OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
 AGREEMENT.
 
    THE SPECIFIC MATTER AT ISSUE, SUBSTANTIALLY AS STATED BY AFGE, IS THE
 FOLLOWING:
 
    DOES THE EMPLOYER, IN A BARGAINING RELATIONSHIP, HAVE AN OBLIGATION
 TO BARGAIN AT THE
 
    DEMAND OF THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE ON A MANDATORY SUBJECT FOR
 BARGAINING DURING THE TERM
 
    OF AN AGREEMENT, WHETHER THE MATTER UPON WHICH BARGAINING IS DEMANDED
 IS COVERED BY THE TERMS
 
    OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT OR NOT?  STYLED FROM THE
 EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE'S
 
    PERSPECTIVE, DOES THE UNION HAVE THE RIGHT TO DEMAND BARGAINING ON A
 MATTER COVERED BY THE
 
    TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT OR NOT COVERED IN AN AGREEMENT, AND HAVE THE
 EMPLOYER BARGAIN IN GOOD
 
    FAITH?
 
    BEFORE DECIDING WHETHER ISSUANCE OF A POLICY STATEMENT WAS WARRANTED,
 THE AUTHORITY INVITED INTERESTED PERSONS TO EXPRESS THEIR VIEWS IN
 WRITING WITH RESPECT TO THE QUESTION OF WHETHER THE AUTHORITY SHOULD
 ISSUE A POLICY STATEMENT ON THIS MATTER.
 
    THE AUTHORITY HAS CAREFULLY CONSIDERED THIS REQUEST, INCLUDING THE
 VIEWS SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO THE NOTICE ISSUED BY THE AUTHORITY, AND
 DETERMINED THAT THE REQUEST DOES NOT SATISFY THE STANDARDS GOVERNING THE
 ISSUANCE OF GENERAL STATEMENTS OF POLICY AND GUIDANCE SET FORTH IN
 SECTION 2427.5 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (45 FED.REG.
 3516(1980)), WHICH PROVIDE IN PERTINENT PART:
 
    SEC. 2427.5 STANDARDS GOVERNING ISSUANCE OF GENERAL STATEMENTS OF
 POLICY AND GUIDANCE.
 
    IN DECIDING WHETHER TO ISSUE A GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY OR
 GUIDANCE, THE AUTHORITY SHALL
 
    CONSIDER:
 
    (A) WHETHER THE QUESTION PRESENTED CAN MORE APPROPRIATELY BE RESOLVED
 BY OTHER MEANS;
 
    (B) WHERE OTHER MEANS ARE AVAILABLE, WHETHER AN AUTHORITY STATEMENT
 WOULD PREVENT THE
 
    PROLIFERATION OF CASES INVOLVING THE SAME OR SIMILAR QUESTION(.)
 
    THE MATTER RAISED IN THIS REQUEST FOR A GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY
 OR GUIDANCE CAN BE MORE APPROPRIATELY RESOLVED BY OTHER MEANS.  FOR
 EXAMPLE, THE PROCEDURES SET FORTH IN THE STATUTE AND APPROPRIATE
 REGULATIONS FOR THE RESOLUTION OF UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES PROVIDE A
 MECHANISM FOR THE RESOLUTION OF THE VARIOUS FACTUAL ISSUES INVOLVED IN A
 CHARGE THAT A PARTY HAS REFUSED TO NEGOTIATE IN GOOD FAITH AS REQUIRED
 BY THE STATUTE.  THOSE PROCEDURES ALSO PROVIDE A MECHANISM FOR THE
 RESOLUTION OF ISSUES OF LAW, THAT MAY BE ANCILLARY TO SUCH FACTUAL
 ISSUES, AS TO WHETHER A MATTER PROPOSED FOR NEGOTIATIONS IS WITHIN THE
 DUTY TO NEGOTIATE.
 
    ALSO, AUTHORITY ACTION ON THIS REQUEST IS NOT WARRANTED SINCE IT
 WOULD NOT PREVENT THE PROLIFERATION OF CASES INVOLVING THE SAME OR
 SIMILAR QUESTIONS.  IN THE AUTHORITY'S VIEW, A MEANINGFUL STATEMENT ON
 THE MATTER RAISED IN THE REQUEST WOULD REQUIRE CONJECTURE BY THE
 AUTHORITY ON A WIDE VARIETY OF POTENTIAL CIRCUMSTANCES.  SUCH A
 STATEMENT WOULD CARRY THE POTENTIAL OF UNSETTLING RATHER THAN
 FACILITATING THE UNDERSTANDING OF OTHER PARTIES AS TO HOW THE STATEMENT
 WOULD APPLY IN THEIR PARTICULAR SITUATION.
 
    ACCORDINGLY, THE REQUEST FOR A GENERAL STATEMENT OF POLICY OR
 GUIDANCE IS DENIED.
 
    ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., MAY 30, 1980
 
                       RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN
 
                       HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER
 
                        LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER
 
                     FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
 
    /1/ FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, NOTICE RELATING TO THE
 ISSUANCE OF A POLICY STATEMENT, 44 FED.REG. 63580 (NOV. 5, 1979).
 Federal Labor Relations Authority
1400 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20424
771-444-5801 
Footer Menu Col1
        
    Home
About Us
Components & Offices
Contact Us 
Footer Menu Col2
        
    Case Types
Decisions
Resources & Training 
Promo Menu Block
        
    eFilingAvailable Here
      
            Footer Secondary Menu
        
    FOIA
Inspector General
No FEAR Act & EEO
Whistleblower Protection
Vulnerability Disclosure
OpenGov
508 Compliance
Privacy Policy