alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

Sutton, Tia

From: Timothy.Mullins@dot.gov

Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015 11:57 AM

To: Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov; Hengst, Benjamin; Sutton, Tia; james.tamm@dot.gov

Cc: Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on HD Phase II NOPR 

Attachments: EPA and NHTSA Responses to Interagency Line Item Comments Received on Ju....docx

Chad and Chandana, 

We have accepted and incorporated these specific interagency recommended edits, except as noted and explained in 

the attached file. 

Thanks, 

Tim 

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, June 05, 2015 5:57 PM 

To: 'Hengst, Benjamin'; 'Sutton, Tia'; Mullins, Timothy (OST); Tamm, James (NHTSA) 

Cc: Achanta, Chandana L. 

Subject: RE: EO 12866 Interagency Comments on HD Phase II NOPR 

All, Few responses to the redline passback from 5_29. Please let me know if you would like to discuss. Thanks, Chad
```

[112th Congress Public Law 247]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 2389]]

Public Law 112-247
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    8771 Auburn Folsom Road in Roseville, California, as the ``Lance 
  Corporal Victor A. Dew Post Office''. <<NOTE: Jan. 10, 2013 -  [H.R. 
                                3892]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL VICTOR A. DEW POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8771 Auburn Folsom Road in Roseville, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Lance Corporal Victor A. Dew Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lance 
Corporal Victor A. Dew Post Office''.

    Approved January 10, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 3892:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Nov. 28, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 27, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 10426)

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 8616, etc.

(Decided January 14, 1963)

*Richard Van Steenburgh*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, con*365sists of birch plywood, exported from Finland in the years 1953,1954, 1955,1956, and 1957.

Counsel for the parties have stipulated and agreed that the merchandise and issues involved in the said appeals are the same in all material respects as those in the case of *United States*v. *Plywood & Door Manufacturers*Corporation, 46 Cust. Ct. 797, A.R.D. 133, decided on remand in *Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation*v. *United*States, 48 Cust. Ct. 526, Reap. Dec. 10151, and that the record in that case be incorporated as part of the record herein.

The appeals have been submitted for decision on written stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the birch plywood involved and that such values are those set forth in column “4” of said schedule, packed, less the prorated amounts of the nondutiable charges set forth directly after the description of the merchandise in each said reappraisement case set forth in schedule “A.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0067 - EN

*|*

# 52007AP0067

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 March 2007 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency (COM(2005)0579 - C6-0403/2006 - 2005/0228(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 301 E , 13/12/2007 P. 0103 - 0103 *

P6_TA(2007)0067

European Aviation Safety Agency ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution of 14 March 2007 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EC) No 1592/2002 of 15 July 2002 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency (COM(2005)0579 — C6-0403/2006 — 2005/0228(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2005)0579) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 80(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0403/2006),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Budgets (A6-0023/2007),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Considers that the reference amount indicated in the legislative proposal must be compatible with the ceiling of heading 1a of the financial framework and with the provisions of point 47 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management [2],

3. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

4. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
No. 50464.

#### Protests 78781-K, etc., of Mutual Trading Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

*262Opinion by

Cline, J.

In view of stipulation of counsel and the cited authorities, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) The merchandise represented by the items marked “A” on the invoices similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co.*(32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303), held free of duty under paragraph 1705 as kelp; (2) the merchandise represented by the items marked *“B”*on the invoices, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co., supra,*held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured; and (3) the merchandise marked with the letter “C” on the invoices, the same as that the subject of *Enbun*v. *United States*(19 C. C. P. A. 79, T. D. 45224), held dutiable at *V/i*cents per pound under paragraph 717 (c) as fish, dried and unsalted. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 31.2.a

CERTIFICATIONS





|I, William H. Downey, certify that:
|-----------------------------------
|                                   
|1.                                 
|                                   
|2.                                 
|                                   
|3.                                 
|                                   
|4.                                 
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|5.                                 
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   
|                                   



|Date: | March 10, 2004 |  | /s/William H. Downey                                   
|----- | -------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|      |                |  |                                                        
|      |                |  | William H. Downey
President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 43996.

#### Protests 783819-G, etc., of Hawley & Letzerich (Galveston).

*256Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Randolph,

Cregger & 25

Chalfant

26

 - 1 -

RANDOLPH, CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

ROBERT L. CHALFANT, State Bar No. 203051

THOMAS A. CREGGER, State Bar No. 124402

1000 G Street, Suite 100 

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-4443

Telecopier: (916) 443-2124

Attorneys for Defendant

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY OF ELK

GROVE, ELK GROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

SERGEANT M. BOYES, DEPUTY M. ROGERS,

DEPUTY P. McCLUNG, and DEPUTY K. BUNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DANIELLE DARDEN; JESSE BLUNT,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, 

DOES 1- 10, inclusive,

Defendants.

 /

No. CIV.S-04-1743 MCE DAD

STIPULATION RE MENTAL AND

PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS OF

PLAINTIFFS [FRCP 35]; ORDER 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, CITY

OF ELK GROVE, ELK GROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT M. BOYES, DEPUTY

M. ROGERS, DEPUTY P. McCLUNG, and DEPUTY K. BUNN and Plaintiffs JESSE BLUNT

and DANIELLE DARDEN, through their respective counsel, and pursuant to FRCP 35, that the

following mental and/or physical examinations may be taken.

1. Mental examination of Plaintiff JESSE BLUNT, to include psychological testing

and interview by a psychologist or psychiatrist.

2. Physical examination of Plaintiff JESSE BLUNT, to be completed by an orthopedic

or neurologic specialist. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-01743-MCE -DAD Document 22 Filed 08/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

Randolph,

Cregger & 25

Chalfant

26

 - 2 -

The exam may consist of the following: submission to plaintiff of a written questionnaire;

interview by physician and/or staff; neurologic and/or orthopedic physical examination.

3. Mental examination of Plaintiff DANIELLE DARDEN, to include psychological

testing and interview by a psychologist of psychiatrist.

4. Defendants will provide plaintiffs’ attorney with copies of all medical and

psychological reports, including all raw data, test results, copies of tests administered to plaintiffs,

written questionnaires filled out by plaintiffs and copies of all interviews of plaintiffs, tape

recordings and all other materials associated with plaintiffs examinations.

Dated: 8/5/ , 2005

_/s/ Charles Bonner ______________

 CHARLES BONNER

Attorneys for Plaintiffs DANIELLE DARDEN and

JESSE BLUNT

Dated: 8/23 , 2005 RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

 /s/ Thomas A. Cregger SBN 124402 

 ROBERT L. CHALFANT

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO, CITY OF ELK GROVE, ELK

GROVE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SERGEANT

M. BOYES, DEPUTY M. ROGERS, DEPUTY P.

McCLUNG, and DEPUTY K. BUNN

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 26, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01743-MCE -DAD Document 22 Filed 08/26/05 Page 2 of 2
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View a Check Capture Terminal Offline Configuration 

To view check capture terminal configuration settings, complete the following steps:

1. Click the Administration tab and select Manage Check Processing>Terminal 

Configuration>View. The View page appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. View Terminal Configuration Page

Click Return Home to the OTCnet Home Page.

Additional Button
<PAGE>66


                                                                     EXHIBIT 21



                               Subsidiaries of the Company


        As of March 19, 1999, the Company owned or controlled the following
percentages of the capital stock of the corporations listed below:


                                          State or Country of
        Name of Corporation                  Incorporation             % Owned


Kollmorgen Overseas Development
    Corporation                               Delaware                   100

Proto-Power Corporation                       Delaware                   100

Kollmorgen Tandon (India)                     India                       51

Tianjin Kollmorgen Industrial                 Peoples' Republic
    Drives Corporation                        of China                    80

Artus Group                                   France                     100
        Kollmorgen Artus
        Societe Anonyme Cryla

Kollmorgen Seidel Servo Drives GmbH           Germany                   100

Kollmorgen Servotronix, Ltd.                  Israel                    100

Kollmorgen Magnedyne Corporation              Delaware                  100
### U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT

U.S. Department of Energy Room IE-245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington , DC 20585 Thursday, August 23, 2007


## Purpose
The Department of Energy (DOE) will present its methodology for the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) analysis and example results. The Department also will explain its plans for the remaining analysis-the analysis to support the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR)-and will seek input from stakeholders on its planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.


## Agenda
9:00-9 : 05 am Welcome 9:05-9:15 am Opening Remarks , Introductions and Agenda Review

Doug Brookman
9:15-9:30 am Rulemaking overview Charles Llenza 

### Overview of the analyses in the rulemaking, the tools DOE uses to generate results for each analysis, and the issues on which DOE would like input during today's meeting.
9:30-10 : 00 am Comments from Participants Doug Brookman Open forum for participants to make a brief summary statement and/or identify their key issues regarding the ANOPR analyses, methods, and data. 

### 10:00-11:15 am Engineering Analysis Aris Marantan and Mike Christopher Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the market and technology assessment, screening analysis, and engineering analysis, and a characterization of the results.


### 11:15-11:30 am Break11:30 am-12:45 pm Life-Cycle Cost Analysis David Winiarski and Mike Scott Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the markups to determine equipment price analysis, energy use characterization, life-cycle cost and payback period analyses, and a characterization of the results.


### 12:45-1 :45 pm Break for Lunch (on your own) 1:45-3:00 pm National Impact Analysis

David Winiarski and Mike Scott Summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the national energy savings, net present value, and shipments analysis, and a characterization of the results. 3:00-3:30 pm Discussion of Other Issues

Doug Brookman Open forum to discuss any remaining questions or issues identified by participants.


### 3:30-3:45 pm Break 3:45-4:30 pm NOPR Analyses

David Winiarski and Mike Scott Summary presentation and discussion regarding the planned revisions to the ANOPR analyses, and the planned approach and factors that will be considered for the manufacturer, utility, employment, and regulatory impact analyses, and the environmental assessment.
4:30-5: 00 pm Next Steps and Closing Remarks

Aris Marantan and Charles Llenza 

### Participants will discuss outstanding issues and concluding remarks. 5:00 pm Adjourn
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of CHAAS Acquisitions, LLC (the "Company")
        on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ronald J.
        Gardhouse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
        U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
        of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.
 
 
 
 
 /s/
        RONALD J. GARDHOUSE
 Ronald
        J. Gardhouse
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 (Principal
        Financial Officer)
 August
        18, 2006
Exhibit







Exhibit 10.8



Amendment Number 2
to the


ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY


LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2014)




WHEREAS, Erie Indemnity Company (the “Company”) established the Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) effective March 2, 2004, most recently restated the Plan effective January 1, 2014, and amended that restatement by Amendment No. 1, effective February 18, 2015, and
WHEREAS, under Section 14 of the Plan, the board of directors of the Company reserved authority to amend the Plan, and
WHEREAS, the board of directors desires to amend the Plan to allow for the deferral of the payment of awards under the Plan, at the election of a participant,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended as follows, effective August 1, 2016:
1.Section 10(a) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:
          (a)    Timing of Payment.  Unless the Participant has a deferral election in effect pursuant to subsection (d), the Company shall pay to the Participant the number of Shares of Common Stock earned and vested pursuant to an award of Restricted Performance Shares, the dollar amount earned and vested pursuant to an award of Performance Units, or the dollar amount payable with respect to the number of Phantom Stock Shares earned and vested pursuant to an award of Phantom Stock, in the first calendar year beginning after the end of the Performance Period for the award, as promptly as reasonably practicable following the Committee’s determination and certification of the award as set forth in Section 8(f), subject to subsections (b) and (c) below.
2.A new subsection (d) is added to Section 10 of the Plan, to read as follows:
                                  (d)           Deferral.  A Participant may elect to defer all or a portion (in whole percentages) of his or her vested interest in an award, in accordance with the terms of a deferral agreement entered into between the Participant and the Company pursuant to the Erie Indemnity Company Incentive Compensation Deferral Plan, as it may be amended from time to time (the “Deferral Plan”), to the extent the Participant is eligible to participate in the Deferral Plan.  An election to defer must be made before the beginning of the Performance Period to which the award relates, except as otherwise allowed under the Deferral Plan for a new employee or a newly-promoted employee.  No amount in excess of the amount of the award deferred shall be payable to the Participant for such deferral, except as may be based upon either an actual or 







deemed reasonable rate of interest or on one or more actual or deemed investment vehicles as made available from time to time by the Company pursuant to the Deferral Plan.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of the Company has caused this document to be executed this 1st day of August, 2016.




ERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY






By /s/ Gregory J. Gutting            
Gregory J. Gutting
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer












2
Exhibit_101_CFO_comp


		
			Exhibit 10.1
		

		
			October 25, 2016
		

		
			Simon Biddiscombe
		

		
			Re:  Amendment to Employment Offer Letter and Severance Benefit Plan Participation Notice between MobileIron, Inc. and Simon Biddiscombe, dated October 25, 2016
		

		
			Dear Simon, 
		

		
			This letter serves to confirm that: 
		

			
	
			
				 1.
			

			
	
			
			Section 6(c) (Commuting Expenses) of your offer letter dated April 30, 2015 (the “Offer Letter”) shall be and hereby is amended to include the following sentence at the end of the section:  “MobileIron will cover taxes associated with commute travel and lodging.”




		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 2.
			

			
	
			
			The definition of “Constructive Termination” for the purpose of your Severance Benefit Plan Participation Notice dated May 10, 2016, as amended (the “Participation Notice”) shall be and hereby is amended to include the following additional subsection (iv) as an additional event or action that will constitute grounds for a “Constructive Termination” (subject to the other provisions of the definition of “Constructive Termination”):  




		
			 
		

		
			“(iv)   a material reduction of Participant’s duties, authority or responsibilities relative to Participant’s duties, authority or responsibilities as in effect immediately prior to such reduction, provided that such a “reduction” will not be deemed to occur if Participant’s duties, title, authority, and responsibilities with respect to the successor subsidiary or division of the parent entity following a Change in Control are substantially similar to Participant’s duties, title, authority and responsibilities with respect to the business of the Company immediately prior to the Change in Control.”
		

		
			 
		

		
			As amended hereby, the Offer Letter and Participation Notice shall continue with full force and effect.  
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			Sincerely,
		

		
			 
		

		
			/s/ Laurel Finch
		

		
			Laurel Finch 
		

		
			VP, General Counsel
		

		
			 
		

		
			ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
		

		
			 
		

		
			 
		

		
			/s/ Simon Biddiscombe 
		

		
			Simon Biddiscombe
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Foundation Capital Partners II, LLLP (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the accounting period ended September 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.

This Certificate is given pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and for no other purpose.

| | /s/ A.J. Braswell                                                                                                                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | A.J. Braswell, Chief Executive Officer
of Foundation Capital Resources, Inc., 
General Partner of Foundation Capital 
Partners II, LLLP
Date: November 10, 2003
| |                                                                                                                                                                
| |                                                                                                                                                                
| |                                                                                                                                                                
| | /s/ Bobby D. Ray                                                                                                                                               
| | Bobby D. Ray, Chief Financial Officer
of Foundation Capital Resources, Inc.,
General Partner of Foundation Capital
Partners II, LLLP
Date: November 10, 2003