10150 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices 

established in the Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: 

Sparklers from the People’s Republic of 

China, 56 FR 20588 (May 6, 1991) 

(‘‘Sparklers’’), as amplified by the Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value: Silicon Carbide from the 

People’s Republic of China, 59 FR 22585 

(May 2, 1994). Under the separate–rates 

criteria, the Department assigns separate 

rates in NME cases only if the 

respondent can demonstrate the absence 

of both de jure and de facto 

governmental control over export 

activities. 

By failing to allow the Department to 

verify the accuracy of their submissions, 

Leping Lotai, Nanjing Merry, and 

Shanghai Strong, have not demonstrated 

they are free of government control and 

are therefore not eligible to receive a 

separate rate. In the Notices of 

Initiation, the Department stated that an 

exporter unable to demonstrate the 

company’s eligibility for a separate rate 

does not meet the requirements of 19 

CFR 351.214(b)(2)(iii) and its new 

shipper review will be rescinded. See 

May 5, 2006, Initiation Notice at 26454; 

see also May 31, 2006, Initiation Notice 

at 30866. Therefore, the Department is 

preliminarily rescinding the new 

shipper reviews of Leping Lotai, 

Nanjing Merry, and Shanghai Strong. 

See, e.g., Notice of Preliminary Results 

of Antidumping Duty New Shipper 

Review and Rescission of New Shipper 

Reviews: Freshwater Crawfish Tail Meat 

from the People’s Republic of China, 69 

FR 53669 (September 2, 2004); see also 

Brake Rotors From the People’s 

Republic of China: Rescission of Second 

New Shipper Review and Final Results 

and Partial Rescission of First 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 64 FR 61581 (November 12, 

1999). 

Schedule for Final Results of Review 

Unless otherwise notified by the 

Department, interested parties may 

submit case briefs within 30 days of the 

date of publication of this notice in 

accordance with section 351.309(c)(ii) of 

the Department’s regulations. As part of 

the case brief, parties are encouraged to 

provide a summary of the arguments not 

to exceed five pages and a table of 

statutes, regulations, and cases cited. 

Rebuttal briefs, which must be limited 

to issues raised in the case briefs, must 

be filed within five days after the case 

brief is filed. 

Any interested party may request a 

hearing within 30 days of publication of 

this notice in accordance with section 

351.310(c) of the Department’s 

regulations. Any hearing would 

normally be held 37 days after the 

publication of this notice, or the first 

workday thereafter, at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue N.W., 

Washington, DC 20230. Individuals who 

wish to request a hearing must submit 

a written request within 30 days of the 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register to the Assistant Secretary for 

Import Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, Room 1870, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230. Requests for a 

public hearing should contain: (1) the 

party’s name, address, and telephone 

number; (2) the number of participants; 

and, (3) to the extent practicable, an 

identification of the arguments to be 

raised at the hearing. If a hearing is 

held, an interested party must limit its 

presentation only to arguments raised in 

its briefs. Parties should confirm by 

telephone the time, date, and place of 

the hearing 48 hours before the 

scheduled time. 

The Department will issue the final 

results of this new shipper review, 

which will include the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in the briefs, 

within 90 days from the date of the 

preliminary results, unless the time 

limit is extended. 

Notification 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders (APO) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely 

written notification of the return/ 

destruction of APO material or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanctions. 

These new shipper reviews and this 

notice are published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: February 22, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–4068 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–357–812, A–570–863] 

Honey From Argentina and the 

People’s Republic of China; Final 

Results of the Expedited Five-Year 

(‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews of Antidumping 

Duty Orders 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On November 1, 2006, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) initiated sunset reviews of 

the antidumping duty orders on honey 

from Argentina and the People’s 

Republic of China (PRC) pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act). On the basis of 

notices of intent to participate and 

adequate substantive responses filed on 

behalf of domestic interested parties, 

and no response from respondent 

interested parties, the Department 

conducted expedited (120-day) sunset 

reviews of these antidumping duty 

orders. As a result of these sunset 

reviews, the Department finds that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

at the levels identified below in the 

‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 7, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Deborah 

Scott, AD/CVD Operations, Office 7 

(Argentina), Catherine Bertrand, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office 9 (PRC) or Dana 

Mermelstein, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 6, Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–2657, (202) 482–3207 or (202) 482–

1391, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Background 

On November 1, 2006, the Department 

initiated sunset reviews of the 

antidumping duty orders on honey from 

Argentina and the PRC pursuant to 

section 751(c) of the Act. See Initiation 

of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews, 71 FR 

64242 (November 1, 2006). The 

Department received notices of intent to 

participate from two domestic interested 

parties, American Honey Producers 

Association and Sioux Honey 

Association (collectively, domestic 

interested parties), within the deadline 

specified in section 351.218(d)(1)(i) of 

the Department’s regulations. Domestic 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices 10151 

interested parties claimed interested 

party status under section 771(9)(C) of 

the Act as U.S. producers of a domestic 

like product and under section 771(9)(E) 

as a trade association whose members 

produce the domestic like product in 

the United States. We received complete 

substantive responses from domestic 

interested parties within the 30-day 

deadline specified in 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). However, we did not 

receive any responses from any 

respondent interested parties. As a 

result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) 

of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), the Department 

conducted expedited sunset reviews of 

these orders. 

Scope of the Orders 

For purposes of these orders, the 

products covered are natural honey, 

artificial honey containing more than 50 

percent natural honey by weight, 

preparations of natural honey 

containing more than 50 percent natural 

honey by weight, and flavored honey. 

The subject merchandise includes all 

grades and colors of honey whether in 

liquid, creamed, comb, cut comb, or 

chunk form, and whether packaged for 

retail or in bulk form. 

The merchandise covered by these 

orders is currently classifiable under 

subheadings 0409.00.00, 1702.90.90, 

and 2106.90.99 of the Harmonized 

Tariff Schedule of the United States 

(HTSUS). Although the HTSUS 

subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

Department’s written description of the 

merchandise under this order is 

dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in these cases are 

addressed in the ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum’’ from Stephen Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD 

Operations, Import Administration, to 

David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary 

for Import Administration, dated March 

1, 2007 (Decision Memorandum), which 

is hereby adopted by this notice. The 

issues discussed in the Decision 

Memorandum include the likelihood of 

continuation or recurrence of dumping 

and the magnitude of the margin likely 

to prevail if the orders were revoked. 

Parties can find a complete discussion 

of all issues raised in these sunset 

reviews and the corresponding 

recommendations in this public 

memorandum, which is on file in room 

B–099 of the main Department building. 

In addition, a complete version of the 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly on the Internet at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/. The paper copy and 

electronic version of the Decision 

Memorandum are identical in content. 

Final Results of Sunset Reviews 

We determine that revocation of the 

antidumping duty orders on honey from 

Argentina and the PRC would likely 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

dumping at the following percentage 

weighted-average margins: 

Manufacturers/exporters/producers 

Weighted-average 

margin 

(percent) 

Argentina: 

Asociacion de Cooperativas Argentinas (ACA) ..................................................................................................................... 37.44 

Radix S.R.L. (Radix) ............................................................................................................................................................... 32.56 

ConAgra Argentina ................................................................................................................................................................. 60.67 

All Others ................................................................................................................................................................................ 35.76 

PRC: 

Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Native Produce and Animal By-Products Import and Export Corporation ................. 57.13 

Kunshan Foreign Trading Co ................................................................................................................................................. 49.60 

Zhejiang Native Produce and Animal By-Products Import and Export Corp ......................................................................... 25.88 

High Hope International Group Jiangsu Foodstuffs Import and Export Corp ........................................................................ 45.46 

Shanghai Eswell Enterprise Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... 45.46 

Anhui Native Produce Import and Export Corporation .......................................................................................................... 45.46 

Henan Native Produce Import and Export Corporation ......................................................................................................... 45.46 

PRC-Wide rate ....................................................................................................................................................................... 183.80 

This notice also serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective orders (APO) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a violation which is subject to 

sanction. 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results and this notice in accordance 

with sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) 

of the Act. 

Dated: March 1, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–4052 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–533–810) 

Notice of Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, Intent to Rescind and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review: Stainless Steel 

Bar from India 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

is conducting an administrative review 

of the antidumping duty order on 

stainless steel bar from India. The 

period of review is February 1, 2005, 

through January 31, 2006. This review 

covers imports of stainless steel bar 

from eight producers/exporters. 

We preliminarily find that sales of the 

subject merchandise have been made 

below normal value. In addition, based 

on the preliminary results for the 

respondents selected for individual 

review, we have preliminarily 

determined a weighted–average margin 

for those companies for which a review 

was requested, but that were not 

selected for individual review. 

If these preliminary results are 

adopted in our final results, we will 

instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection to assess antidumping duties 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES