alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended September 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: November 9, 2007
_____________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
No. 64901.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc., *v.*United States,

protest 59/12858 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, G. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of magnifying glasses the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Sussfeld, Lorsch & Co.*v. *United States*(30 Treas. Dec. 265, T.D. 36174), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 31****Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer****Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**I, Michael J. Koss, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Koss Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
---

---

Exhibit 4.(a).42

[FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY, NOT AN OFFICIAL TRANSLATION]

[State Emblem]

# The State of Israel Ministry
of Communications

General
License for Partner Communications Ltd. for the Provision of Mobile Radio Telephone
(MRT) Services using the Cellular Method

# Amendment No. 27

By virtue of the powers of the
Minister of Communications under Article 4 (e) of the Communications Law
(Telecommunications and Broadcasts), 5742-1982, that have been delegated to us, by all our
other powers under any law, we hereby amend the General License for the provision of
mobile radio telephone (MRT) services using the cellular method granted to Partner
Communications Company Ltd. on 7 April 1998, as follows:

# Amendment of Article 75C

| | 1. | In
Article 75C, the words 9 August 2004 shall be replaced by 9 February
2005".
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

# Amendment of Footnote to
Article 75C

| | 2 | In
footnote (a) of Article 75C, the words for a period of only three months shall
be deleted.
| | - | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 8, 2004

|/s/ Uri Olenik
Uri Olenik, Adv.Director-GeneralMinistry of Communications | /s/ Haim Giron
Haim Giron, Adv.Senior Deputy Director-General,Engineering and Licensing, Ministry ofCommunications
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Exhibit 32.2

KINDER MORGAN, INC.CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

     (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:  March 4, 2005 |  | /s/ C. Park    Shaper                                                  |
|---------------------------------|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                 |  | C. Park Shaper    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4513 

To expand eligibility for Junior Reserve Officers’ Training Corps unit 

participation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2024 

Mrs. CAPITO (for herself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. CORNYN, Mrs. BRITT, Mr. 

CRUZ, Ms. ERNST, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. MORAN, and Mr. BUDD) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To expand eligibility for Junior Reserve Officers’ Training 

Corps unit participation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving JROTC 

5 Programs Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4513 IS

1 SEC. 2. NUMBER OF ENROLLED STUDENTS REQUIREMENT 

2 FOR JUNIOR RESERVE OFFICERS’ TRAINING 

3 CORPS UNIT PARTICIPATION. 

4 Section 2031(b)(1)(A) of title 10, United States 

5 Code, is amended by striking ‘‘or (ii) 100, whichever is 

6 less’’ and inserting ‘‘or (ii) 50, whichever is less’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Before the Third Division,

July 10, 1942

No. 47388.

#### Protest 42618-K of Daniel F. Young, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The merchandise is described on the invoice as “Book Kate Greenway with 72 original drawings (Binding over 20 years old).” At the trial a buyer of works .of art for the Wakefield Book-Shop, the importer in this case, testified that she personally bought the merchandise in London at Spencer’s, a dealer in works of art, books, and drawings. After testifying as to her education and experience along the lines of art she stated that Kate Greenway was an artist, particularly of children, children’s portraits, children’s scenes, etc.; that several exhibitions of Kate Greenway’s works have been held in London, the first in 1891 in the Royal Academy; that she had produced things which were for illustrative use and had written books in which her drawings appeared as illustrar-tions; that she had produced works of the free fine art which were not used for illustrative or utilitarian purposes; that she [the witness] had sold the shipment in this country to an art collector; that from her education and experience she was of the opinion they had not been used for illustrations; that they were unfinished, although signed with the artist’s initials, and they were clean and new and showed no signs of having had “wood blocks or things of that sort made from them”; that from her study of Kate Greenway’s works she had never seen any of these particular drawings used as illustrations; and that in the condition as imported, she believed they could not be used for illustrative or industrial purposes. On cross-examination she testified that besides making drawings for illustrations in her own books, Kate Greenway had made illustrations for books written by other people. On redirect examination she testified that she could see no reason to believe that these drawings were created for industrial or illustrative uses and did not believe that they were. The protest did not challenge the classification of the *382collector on the binding which was separated by the appraiser from the drawings for classification purposes. The court was of the opinion that the uncontradicted testimony in the instant ease was sufficient to make out a *'prima facie*case as the evidence contradicts the collector’s finding that the drawings are articles for industrial use or that they were created as articles of utility. The court therefore found that the drawings herein involved are originals and were not created or used for illustrations or as articles of utility or for industrial purposes and that they are entitled to free entry under paragraph 1807 as claimed. *Tice & Lynch*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 84, C. D. 292) distinguished.
No. 51403.

#### Protests 111013-K, etc., of Kerr-Gifford & Co., Inc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained as to certain items of the merchandise involved.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 7643

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. KENNETH RAY JOHNSON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:07

- cr
- 00316

- LMB

- 1 )

Submitted : March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kenneth Ray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Gerard John Mene, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpub lished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth Ray Johnson appeals the district court’s order s: authorizing the B ureau of Prisons to remit to the district court funds held in Johnson’s trust account as payment

to wards cour t

- ordered restitution; and denying his motion for reconsideration

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson , No. 1:07

- cr
- 00316

- LMB

- 1 (E.D.
Va. Oct. 27 & Dec. 6, 2017) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of William J. Rita, Petitioner, v Howard Malatzky, Respondent.

[635 NYS2d 468]

—Application seeking vacatur of a determination made by respondent denied, the cross-motion granted and the petition dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. This proceeding is not properly brought before *this*Court. No opinion. Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Rubin, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Flatbush Federal Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Jesus R. Adia, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John S. Lotardo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  /s/ Jesus R. AdiaJesus R. AdiaPresident andChief Executive Officer/s/ John S. LotardoJohn S. LotardoExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 
 Date: May 16, 2011
Exhibit 32






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of the smaller reporting company of DAM Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Klein, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: September 20, 2011








By: /s/ MARK KLEIN


Mark Klein


Chief Executive Officer and


Chief Financial Officer
No. 56458.

protests 175177-K, etc. (New York).

#### Herman C. Kupper, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 41792.

#### Protests 585491-G, etc., of L. Fatato, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 40880 it was held that an allowance should have been made in the weight of the cheese to compensate for the inedible covering on the outside.
No. 61379.

protests 295989-K, etc (New York).

#### Twin Textiles Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veils or veilings similar in all material, respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Prospero Minerals Corp. (Prospero) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Etoile Pinder, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to s.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Prospero.

PROSPERO MINERALS CORP.

By:/s/ Hubert Pinder

Name: Hubert PinderTitle:Chief Financial Officer 
    Dated: January 24th, 2009

---
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Grant Prideco, Inc.
 September 11, 2007
    
    /s/ Michael McShaneName: Michael McShaneTitle: President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Matthew D. FitzgeraldName: Matthew D. FitzgeraldTitle: Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
No. 50480.

#### Protests 52264-K/90126, etc., of Atlas Grocery Co. et al. (Chicago, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 8506)

#### Intermaritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 741338.

(Decided January 6, 1956)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper value for dutiable purposes of a rivet setting machine, identified on the invoice accompanying the entry covered by this appeal for a reappraisement by the letter “A” and initials “HG” of Examiner H. Golub, is before the court for determination.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that such a machine was freely offered for sale for home consumption in England, the country of exportation, at the time of exportation, to all purchasers in the principal markets of England, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, at £104.0.0 (British sterling) each, plus cases, as invoiced, and that there was no export value for such or similar merchandise.

Upon the agreed facts, I find that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the rivet setting machine in issue, and that such value is £104.0.0 (British sterling) each, plus cases, as invoiced.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 8691)

Entry No. 958936.

#### Carl Zeiss, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 24, 1956)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement consists of 10 pcs. binoculars 7 x 42 and 10 leather carrying cases for the same.

> That at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers, in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, the foreign value of such or similar merchandise being no higher, was as follows in German Deutschemarks, plus packing as invoiced:

> Binoculars — each_195. 00

> Leather Carrying Cases — each_ 16. 50

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeal for reappraisement may be deemed to be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

*545On the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the “10 pcs. binoculars 7 x 42 and 10 leather carrying cases for the same,” and that such values were as follows:

> German deutsehemarks per each

> Binoculars_195. 00

> Leather carrying cases_ 16. 50

> Plus packing, as invoiced

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 50981.

#### Protest 985847-G of Chong Sing & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The uncontradicted testimony of the customs examiner established that the articles described on the invoice as “28 — 6 cases, paper snake” are in fact novelties, being “in no sense a toy.” They are made to simulate a snake, consisting of a head composed of earthenware or clay and a paper body, suspended from a little bamboo stick by a small black thread, and are used at carnivals or beaches. The articles in question were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 409 as claimed. It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of a commodity the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). On the stipulated facts said merchandise, which includes salt as a substantial component part thereof, was excluded from paragraph 5 and held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558.
# C_2006063EN.01003501.xml

| 16.3.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/35

---

United Kingdom Government notice concerning European Parliament and Council Directive 94/22/EC of 30 May 1994 on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2006/C 63/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

ANNOUNCEMENT OF UNITED KINGDOM 24th OFFSHORE OIL AND GAS LICENSING ROUND

DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY

The Petroleum Act 1998

Offshore Licensing Round

The Secretary of State for Trade and Industry invites interested persons to apply for Seaward Production Licences in respect of certain acreage on the United Kingdom Continental Shelf.

This invitation is in respect of those blocks and parts of blocks that are not subject to an existing petroleum production licence on the date of this Notice in the areas shown on maps deposited at the Department of Trade and Industry, where they can be viewed by prior appointment (tel: (44) (0) 20 7215 5032) between 0915 and 1645, Monday to Friday during the period of this notice.

Full details of the offer, including lists and maps of the acreage on offer and guidance about licences, the terms which those licences will include, and how to apply, are available on the Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU) website (see below).

All applications will be judged in accordance with the terms of the Hydrocarbons Licensing Directive Regulations 1995 (S.I. 1995 No. 1434) and against a background of the continuing need for expeditious, thorough, efficient and safe exploration to identify the United Kingdom's oil and gas resources with due regard to environmental considerations. The criteria are available in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ C 56, 4.3.2004, p. 3) paragraphs 9 to 14 inclusive. Further guidance detailing the above which accompany this offer can be viewed on the Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU) website: http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/

Licences

Where the Secretary of State offers a licence pursuant to this invitation, the offer will be made within twelve months of the date of this Notice.

The Secretary of State accepts no liability for any costs incurred by the applicant in considering or making its application.

Strategic Environmental Assessment

DTI has conducted a Strategic Environmental Assessment of all of the area to be offered to the standard required in Directive 2001/42/EC on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment. The finding of the assessment can be found at the Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU) website: http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/

Licence Administration: Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU), Department of Trade and Industry, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET, United Kingdom (tel: (44) (0) 20 7215 5032, fax: (44) (0) 20 7215 5070).

Energy Resources Development Unit (ERDU) website: http://www.og.dti.gov.uk/

---