alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

EILEEN M. DIEPENBROCK, State Bar No. 119254 

GENE K. CHEEVER, State Bar No. 148063 

DIEPENBROCK HARRISON 

A Professional Corporation 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1800 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 492-5000 

Facsimile: (916) 446-4535 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Scott Hanson, Pat McClain and 

Hanson McClain Retirement Network 

MITCHELL CHYETTE, State Bar No. 113087 

LELAND, PARACHINI, STEINBERG, MATZGER & MELNICK, LLP 

333 Market Street, 27th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94105-2171 

Telephone: (415) 957-1800 

Facsimile: (415) 974-1520 

Attorneys for Burk Rosenthal 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

SCOTT HANSON, an individual; and 

PAT McCLAIN, an individual; 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

BURK ROSENTHAL, an individual, 

 Defendant. 

AND RELATED COUNTER CLAIMS AND 

CROSS-ACTIONS. 

CASE NO. CVS-04-2298 MCE PAN 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all of the parties to this action by and 

through their designated counsel of record that, pursuant to the agreed-upon settlement in this 

Case 2:04-cv-02298-MCE -PAN Document 26 Filed 06/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

matter, the above-captioned action in its entirety, including without limitation the first amended 

complaint and the amended counter-complaint and cross-complaint, shall be, and is hereby 

ordered dismissed with prejudice as to all parties and all causes of action pursuant to Federal 

Rules of Procedure, Rule 41(a). No party to recover costs except as expressly permitted by the 

written settlement agreement. 

This Stipulation may be executed, including by facsimile, in one or more 

counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all together shall 

constitute one and the same document. 

SO STIPULATED

 June 

DATED: May _8_, 2005 DIEPENBROCK HARRISON 

 A Professional Corporation 

By s/ Gene K. Cheever 

 GENE K. CHEEVER 

 Attorneys for Scott Hanson, Pat McClain and 

Hanson McClain Retirement Network 

DATED: June 7, 2005 LELAND, PARACHINI, STEINBERG, 

MATZGER & MELNICK, LLP 

 By s/ Mitchell Chyette 

MITCHELL CHYETTE 

 Attorneys for Burk Rosenthal 

SO ORDERED

DATED: June 15, 2005 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

 

Case 2:04-cv-02298-MCE -PAN Document 26 Filed 06/15/05 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the following certifications are being made to
accompany the Registrants annual report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year
ended June 30, 2003:

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Michael J. Koss, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Koss
Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(i) the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal quarter
ended June 30, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: March 10, 2004

/s/ Michael J. Koss
Michael J. Koss
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDGAR M. COLLINS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2243 LKK KJM P

vs.

U.S. DISTRICT COURT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 21, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and

recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility

to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(f),

service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

Case 2:04-cv-02243-LKK -KJM Document 10 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 21, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: January 12, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/coll2243.802

Case 2:04-cv-02243-LKK -KJM Document 10 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 60843.

#### Metallurg, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 273656-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 6 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Steven Lynn,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-2126 LKK PAN P

vs. Order

A. K. Scribner,

Respondent.

-oOoOctober 20, 2005, respondent requested an extension of time

to file and serve an answer to the petition. Good cause

appearing, respondent’s request is granted and time is extended

until 30 days from the date this order is signed.

So ordered.

Dated: October 25, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02126-ALA Document 21 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 1
EX-4.1


 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 






 SANDRIDGE ENERGY, INC. 

The Corporation will furnish, without charge to each stockholder who so requests, the powers, designations, preferences and relative,
participating, optional or other special rights of each class or series of stock of the Corporation, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. Please direct any such request to the Corporation or the
Transfer Agent. 
  
  

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out
in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

													
	TEN COM	  	–	 	as tenants in common	 		 	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT–	 	........................Custodian...................
	TEN ENT	  	–	 	as tenants by the entireties	 		 		 	            (Cust)	  	(Minor)    
	JT TEN	  	–	 	as joint tenants with right of	 		 		 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors
		  		 	survivorship and not as tenants in common	 		 		 	Act................................................
		  		 	 		 		 	(State)

 Additional abbreviations may also be used even though not in the above list. 

For value received, I,
                                         
                                         
   ,now sell, assign and transfer to 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
  

							
	 			
	 	  		  		  	

  
  

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 

 
  
  

 

                          
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
              shares of the Common Stock represented by this Certificate, and do irrevocably constitute and
appoint                                       
  

                          
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
       Attorney to transfer this stock on the books of the Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. 

Dated
                                        

  

					
		 		 	  

			
		 		 	  

		 	NOTICE:	 	THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.

 Signature(s) Guaranteed: 
  

			
	By
                                         
                                         
                                         
                                         
                	  	
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks,	  	
	Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED	  	
	SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
Case No. 8,437.

#### LLOYD v. YOST.

[Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [WY-923-1310-FI; WYW151267] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed reinstatement of terminated oil and gas lease.

# SUMMARY:

Under the provisions of 30 U.S.C. 188(d) and (e), and 43 CFR 3108.2-3(a) and (b)(1), the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) received a petition for reinstatement from Windsor Wyoming LLC, Discovery Exploration, Inc., Krislen Energy, LC, and The Dean Sanditen Marital Trust for competitive oil and gas lease WYW151267 for land in Park County, Wyoming. The petition was filed on time and was accompanied by all the rentals due since the date the lease terminated under the law. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, Pamela J. Lewis, Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication, at (307) 775-6176. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The lessees have agreed to the amended lease terms for rentals and royalties at rates of $10 per acre or fraction thereof, per year and 16                    2/3                     percent, respectively. The lessees have paid the required $500 administrative fee and $163 to reimburse the Department for the cost of this                     **Federal Register**                     notice. The lessees have met all the requirements for reinstatement of the lease as set out in Sections 31(d) and (e) of the Mineral Lands Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188), and the Bureau of Land Management is proposing to reinstate lease WYW151267 effective October 1, 2006, under the original terms and conditions of the lease and the                           ( print page 10243)                        increased rental and royalty rates cited above. BLM has not issued a valid lease affecting the lands.                 

Pamela J. Lewis, 

Chief, Branch of Fluid Minerals Adjudication.

[FR Doc. E7-4093 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-22-P
(Reap. Dec. 8510)

#### L. E. McCullough & Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 955, etc.

(Decided January 12, 1956)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*Warren E. Burger,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivek, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiffs, and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, subject to the approval of Court, that the merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A, which Schedule A is made a part of this stipulation, consists of illuminating glassware imported from Czechoslovakia which is similar in all material respects to the merchandise that was the subject of decision in the case of *United States v. Nelson Bead Co.,*C. A. D. 590, and that *498the issues involved in said reappraisement appeals set forth in the attached Schedule A are similar in all material respects to the issues in said case.

It is further stipulated and agreed that the record in the case of *United States v. Nelson Bead Co.,*C. A. D. 590 be incorporated in and made a part of the record in the cases set forth in the attached Schedule A.

It is further stipulated and agreed that the appraised values of the merchandise covered by the reappraisement appeals in the attached Schedule A, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the Appraiser in similar cases, are equal to the market values or the prices at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, and that there was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise.

The reappraisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the additions made by the importer on entry because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN HUBBS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2256 GEB DAD P

vs.

STEVEN MAYBERG,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

A recent court order was served on plaintiff at his address of record and was

returned by the postal service marked undeliverable as addressed and unable to forward. It

appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which requires that each

party appearing in propria persona is under a continuing duty to notify the court and all other

parties of any change of address.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for

plaintiff’s failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f)

and 11-110.

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

fifteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

Case 2:04-cv-02256-GEB-DAD Document 22 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. See Martinez

v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: July 28, 2005.

DAD:13

hubb2256.33a

Case 2:04-cv-02256-GEB-DAD Document 22 Filed 07/29/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21

                                 SUBSIDIARIES

THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF THE COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES:

                                                           Percentage of Voting
                                            Organized      Securities Owned By
Name                                      Under Laws of         Keane, Inc.
----                                      -------------    --------------------

Dataskills, Inc.                          Massachusetts           100%
Keane Federal Systems, Inc.                 Delaware              100%
Keane Canada, Inc.                           Canada               100%
169963 Canada, Inc.                          Canada               100%
Keane Securities Corporation              Massachusetts           100%
Keane Technology Services Company          California             100%
Keane Consulting Group                      Illinois              100%
(formally Bricker & Associates, Inc.)
Keane Limited, Inc.                      United Kingdom           100%
Keane Tech, LLC                            Delaware               100%
Keane Business Trust                      Massachusetts           100%
Keane Care, Inc.                           Washington             100%
 (formally Care Computer Systems, Inc.)
Keane Service Company                      California             100%
*Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5 the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-30281 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN B. CORLEY, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:05-CR-50083

Before GARWOOD, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * John B. Corley appeals the sentence imposed following his post-Booker conviction of theft of firearms that were transported in interstate commerce, transporting stolen firearms in interstate commerce, possession of stolen firearms that were transported in interstate commerce, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Corley argues for the first time on appeal that the non-** It does not reflect any general dissatisfaction with the

offense Guidelines. 2 Guidelines sentence imposed by the district court was unreasonable because the distr ict court based its decision on general dissatisfaction with the Guidelines. He also argues that the Guidelines adequately accounted for his criminal behavior. The record indicates that the distric t court correctly calculated the Guidelines range and used the Guidelines as a frame of reference. ** See United States v. Smith , 440 F.3d 704, 707 (5th C ir. 2006). The district court, troubled by Corley’s extensive criminal history (29 criminal history points) and the facts of his offenses, articulated reasons that were consistent with 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) for imposing a non-Guidelines sentence. See id . Moreover, given the seriousness of Corley’s criminal history and offense conduct as found by the district court, the extent of the deviation was not unreasonable. See United States v. Smith , 417 F.3d 483, 491-93 and n.40-42 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S.Ct. 713 (2005). Corley fails to meet his burden of showing that the district court’s non-Guidelines sentence, which was imposed after U nited States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005), was error, plain or otherwise. See United States v. Jones , 444 F.3d 430, 434-36 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S.Ct. 2958 (2006). AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1

FRED M. PLEVIN (SBN 126185) 

MELISSA LISTUG KLICK (SBN 228470) 

PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & CONNAUGHTON LLP

401 B Street, Tenth Floor 

San Diego, California 92101-8214 

Telephone: 619-237-5200 

Facsimile: 619-615-0700 

Attorneys for DEFENDANT 

JENNY CRAIG, INC. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

KARY DELOSIE, GABRIELLE 

STEVENS, AND LISA GARY, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

JENNY CRAIG, INC., JACKIE 

FRENZI, BRANDI MARTIN, AND 

DOES 1-20, 

Defendants. 

CASE NO. CIV S-04-1965 MCE DAD 

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES TO 

EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION 

HEARING CUT-OFF DATE AND 

ORDER 

Courtroom: 3 

Judge: Morrison C. England Jr. 

Complaint Filed: May 21, 2004 

Trial Date: February 15, 2006 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between all of the parties to the abovecaptioned matter that for good cause appearing the Status Order in this matter dated 

December 15, 2004, shall be modified so that all dispositive motions shall be heard no 

later than November 14, 2005. 

All other discovery, including expert witnesses, and trial dates in the action remain 

unchanged by this stipulation. This order shall not form the basis to extend any other cutoff dates, to add any new parties, causes of actions or defenses, or to continue the trial 

date. 

Case 2:04-cv-01965-MCE -DAD Document 7 Filed 08/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

2

This stipulation will advance the fair and efficient administration of justice to 

enable the parties to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations. Toward this end, the 

parties have agreed to attend a mediation and have chosen and retained a mediator. A 

mediation has been scheduled for September 13, 2005, which is the first available date the 

parties and the selected mediator can schedule the mediation. The parties believe that the 

mediation will be more effective in resolving the matter if it is completed before either 

party must exert the time and expense to prepare a dispositive motion. This stipulation 

will not affect the trial date in this matter. 

IT IS HEREBY AGREED: 

Dated: August , 2005 DONLON LAW FIRM 

By: 

RISE DONLON 

Attorneys for PLAINTIFFS KARY 

DELOSIE, GABRIELLE STEVENS 

AND LISA GARY 

Dated: August , 2005 PAUL, PLEVIN, SULLIVAN & 

CONNAUGHTON LLP

By: 

FRED M. PLEVIN 

MELISSA LISTUG KLICK 

Attorneys for DEFENDANT JENNY 

CRAIG, INC. 

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING: 

Dated: August 25, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-01965-MCE -DAD Document 7 Filed 08/25/05 Page 2 of 2