alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 467 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.467

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty three

                                 An Act

 
To modify the age requirement for the Student Incentive Payment Program 
                    of the State maritime academies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Changing Age-Determined Eligibility 
To Student Incentive Payments Act'' or the ``CADETS Act''.
SEC. 2. AGE REQUIREMENT FOR THE STUDENT INCENTIVE PAYMENT PROGRAM OF 
THE STATE MARITIME ACADEMIES.
    Section 51509 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(i) Age Requirement.--The Secretary may make an agreement under 
this section only with a qualified student who will meet the age 
requirement for enlistment or commission in the Navy Reserve at the 
time of graduation from the academy.''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Before the Second Division,

September 5, 1945

No. 50449.

#### Protest 92983-K of Welansky & Goldberg (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The plaintiff submitted uncontradicted evidence consisting of samples of the imported merchandise, oral testimony, and corroborative printed descriptive matter with pictorial representations illustrating the use of said articles as sewing-machine parts in sewing machines valued at less than $75 each. On the established facts it was held that the articles represented by the invoice items above enumerated are properly dutiable as claimed.
EXHIBIT NO. 21- SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRATION
INTERNATIONAL DAIRY QUEEN, INC.

                                                     Jurisdiction of
Subsidiary (1)                                       Incorporation
----------                                           -------------

American Dairy Queen Corporation                     Delaware
Orange Julius of America                             California
DQF, Inc.                                            Minnesota
Golden Skillet International, Inc.                   Minnesota
Karmelkorn Shoppes, Inc.                             Delaware
Dairy Queen of Georgia, Inc.                         Minnesota
Dairy Queen Canada, Inc. (2)(3)                      Canada (Federal)
Dairy Queen Corporate Stores, Inc. (4)(5)(6)         Kentucky

(1) All subsidiaries are 100% owned by Registrant.

(2) IDQ Canada, Inc. {Canada (Federal)} is a wholly-owned subsidiary Of Dairy
    Queen Canada, Inc.

(3) Orange Julius Canada, Ltd. {Canada (Federal)} is a wholly-owned subsidiary
    of Dairy Queen Canada, Inc.

(4) DQ Wholly-Owned Stores, Inc. (Kentucky) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
    Dairy Queen Corporate Stores, Inc.

(5) DQ Joint Venture Stores, Inc. (Kentucky) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
    Dairy Queen Corporate Stores, Inc.

(6) DQ Managed Stores, Inc. (Kentucky) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dairy
    Queen Corporate Stores, Inc.

Registrant also owns 60% of the outstanding capital stock of Firstaff, Inc., a
Minnesota corporation.
No. 65524.

#### Davies, Turner *&*Company *v.*United States,

protest 58/17847 (Philadelphia).

Opinion of

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Twin Mix” the same in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of *The Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 280, C.D. 2142), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 52309.

protests 46201-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
Government Regulatory

 Impact Model

Central ACs and Heat Pumps

STANDARD CASE SCENARIO Base Year

Announce 

Year

Standard 

Year

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 

Income Statement

Unit Sales 1.13 1.12 1.13 1.15 1.18 1.21 1.19 1.21 1.24 1.25 1.27 1.2Revenues 647$ 639$ 644$ 656$ 672$ 690$ 904$ 926$ 944$ 951$ 966$ 968$ 

Cost of Sales

Labor 35$ 35$ 35$ 35$ 36$ 37$ 49$ 50$ 51$ 51$ 52$ 52$ 

Material 410$ 405$ 409$ 416$ 426$ 438$ 573$ 587$ 599$ 603$ 613$ 614$ 

Overhead 48$ 48$ 48$ 49$ 50$ 52$ 68$ 70$ 71$ 71$ 73$ 73$ 

Depreciation 17$ 17$ 17$ 17$ 18$ 18$ 24$ 25$ 25$ 26$ 26$ 26$ 

78.96% 79.03% 79.03%

Selling, General and Administrative

Standard SG&A 91$ 89$ 90$ 92$ 94$ 97$ 127$ 130$ 132$ 133$ 135$ 136$ 

R&D $ 6 6$ 6$ 7$ 7$ 7$ 9$ 9$ 9$ 10$ 10$ 10$ 

Product Conversion Expense -$ -$ 1$ 6$ 13$ 17$ 1$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 

Profit Before Tax 39$ 39$ 38$ 33$ 27$ 25$ 53$ 55$ 56$ 57$ 58$ 58$ 

Taxes 18 $ 18$ 17$ 15$ 12$ 11$ 24$ 25$ 26$ 26$ 26$ 26$ 

Net Income Before Financing 21$ 21$ 21$ 18$ 15$ 14$ 29$ 30$ 31$ 31$ 31$ 32$ 

Cash Flow Statement

Net Income 21$ 21$ 21$ 18$ 15$ 14$ 29$ 30$ 31$ 31$ 31$ 32$ 

Depreciation 17$ 17$ 17$ 17$ 18$ 18$ 24$ 25$ 25$ 26$ 26$ 26$ 

Change in Working Capital -$ 1$ (1)$ (1)$ (1)$ (2)$ (20)$ (2)$ (2)$ (1)$ (1)$ (0

$ 

Cash Flows from Operations 38$ 39$ 37$ 34$ 31$ 30$ 33$ 53$ 55$ 56$ 56$ 57$ 

Ordinary Capital Expenditures (19)$ (18)$ (19)$ (19)$ (19)$ (20)$ (26)$ (27)$ (27)$ (28)$ (28)$ (28

$ 

Conversion Capital Expenditures -$ -$ (1)$ (5)$ (11)$ (13)$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 

Cash Used In Investment (19)$ (18)$ (19)$ (24)$ $ (30) (33)$ (26)$ (27)$ (27)$ (28)$ (28)$ (28

$ 

Net Cash Flow 20$ 20$ 18$ 10$ 1$ (3)$ 7$ 26$ 27$ 28$ 28$ 29$ 

Terminal Value -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 

Present Value Factor 1.0000 0.9413 0.8860 0.8339 0.7850 0.7389 0.6955 0.6546 0.6162 0.5800 0.5459 0.5138 Discounted Cash Flow 20$ 19$ 16$ 9$ 1$ (2)$ 5$ 17$ 17$ 16$ 15$ 15$ 

Industry Value thru 2016 407$ 

8/29/2006 Standard Case
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 47 (Monday, March 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11012-11013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4347]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-313-000]


National Fuel Gas Supply Corporation; Notice of Tariff Filing

March 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 28, 2007, National Fuel Gas Supply 
Corporation (National) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1, Ninety Eighth Revised Sheet No. 9, 
to become effective March 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in

[[Page 11013]]

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing an 
intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89cfccdbcac6e7e5e0e7ecdafcf9f9e6fbfdc9efecfbeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="43050611000c2d2f2a2d26103633332c313703252631206d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4347 Filed 3-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIGUEL E. DIAZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-2375 MCE JFM P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed his second request for an extension of time to file and serve a

second amended complaint pursuant to the court’s order of October 26, 2005. Good cause

appearing, the request will be granted. 

Plaintiff has also requested a court order requiring prison officials to provide him

with additional access to the prison law library. Citing Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343 (1996),

plaintiff contends that he will suffer “actual injury” to his right of court access if prison officials

do not provide him with additional time in the law library because he will be unable to meet

court deadlines set in this and two other actions pending in the United States District Court for

the Northern District of California. 

As noted above, this court will grant plaintiff an additional period in which to file

a second amended complaint. Plaintiff will not suffer “actual injury” in this action to his right of 

Case 2:04-cv-02375-MCE -JFM Document 53 Filed 02/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

court access in the absence of the requested court order. Plaintiff’s motion for court-ordered

access to the law library will therefore be denied. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's December 5, 2005 request for an extension of time is granted; 

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a second

amended complaint; and

3. Plaintiff’s December 5, 2005 motion for court-ordered access to the prison law

library is denied.

DATED: February 6, 2006. 

 

12/mp

diaz2375.36sec

Case 2:04-cv-02375-MCE -JFM Document 53 Filed 02/06/06 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4350 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend acute hospital 

care at home waiver flexibilities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2024 

Mr. CARPER (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina, Ms. SMITH, and Mr. 

TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to extend 

acute hospital care at home waiver flexibilities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hospital Inpatient 

5 Services Modernization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENDING ACUTE HOSPITAL CARE AT HOME 

7 WAIVER FLEXIBILITIES. 

8 Section 1866G of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 1395cc–7) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4350 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘2024’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘2029’’; and 

3 (2) in subsection (b)— 

4 (A) in the heading, by striking ‘‘STUDY

5 AND REPORT’’ and inserting ‘‘STUDIES AND

6 REPORTS’’; and 

7 (B) in paragraph (1)— 

8 (i) in the matter preceding subpara9 graph (A), by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘Not later than September 

11 30, 2024, and again not later than Sep12 tember 30, 2028, the Secretary’’; 

13 (ii) in subparagraph (B)— 

14 (I) in clause (iv), by striking 

15 ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

16 (II) in clause (v), by striking the 

17 period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

18 (III) by adding at the end the 

19 following new clause: 

20 ‘‘(vi) in the case of the second study 

21 conducted under this paragraph, the qual22 ity of care, outcomes, costs, quantity and 

23 intensity of services, and other relevant 

24 metrics between individuals who entered 

25 into the Acute Hospital Care at Home iniVerDate Sep 11 2014 19:36 Jun 18, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4350.IS S4350

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4350 IS

1 tiative directly from an emergency depart2 ment compared with individuals who en3 tered into the Acute Hospital Care at 

4 Home initiative directly from an existing 

5 inpatient stay in a hospital.’’; and 

6 (C) in paragraph (2)— 

7 (i) in the header, by striking ‘‘RE8 PORT’’ and inserting ‘‘REPORTS’’; and 

9 (ii) by inserting ‘‘and again not later 

10 than September 30, 2028,’’ after ‘‘2024,’’; 

11 and 

12 (iii) by striking ‘‘on the study con13 ducted under paragraph (1).’’ and insert14 ing the following: ‘‘on— 

15 ‘‘(A) with respect to the first report sub16 mitted under this paragraph, the first study 

17 conducted under paragraph (1); and 

18 ‘‘(B) with respect to the second report sub19 mitted under this paragraph, the second study 

20 conducted under paragraph (1).’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 53579.

protest 141065-K (New York).

#### Tropical Craft Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399),.the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 54058.

#### Julius Wile Sons & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 134896-K (New York).

Opinion

by Eicwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 10.30**
**NINTH AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT**
THIS NINTH AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and enteredinto this 30th day of June, 2004 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by andbetween Koss Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Licensor”), and JiangsuElectronics Industries Limited, a British Virgin Islands company (“Licensee”).The License Agreement dated November 15, 1991 between Licensee (by way ofassignment) and Licensor, as previously amended and as further amended by thisAmendment, is referred to in this Amendment as the “Agreement”.
For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which arehereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows as ofthe Amendment Effective Date:
1. Exhibit B of the Agreement, under the heading “Home and Portable Products”,is amended as follows:
A. The royalty for “Audio systems of any nature (excluding clockradios and audio systems incorporating clock radios) with a compactdisc player and/or a CD changer” is changed from 1.5% to 1.3%. B. “MP3 players of any nature (but not including solid state MP3players built into headphones)” are added to the “Home and PortableProducts”. Licensee will pay Licensor a royalty of 1.3% for theseproducts.
2. Licensor continues to retain the right to market the following:
A. A solid state MP3 player built into a headphone through all ofLicensor’s distribution channels. B. A solid state MP3 player of any nature other than if built intoa headphone directly to consumers through Licensor’s website, atfactory stores and by direct mail. C. An AM/FM radio built into a headphone through all of Licensor’sdistribution channels. D. Tabletop stereos which are sold at a minimum retail price of$198 through Licensor’s website, at factory stores and by directmail. E. Clock radios which are sold at a minimum retail price of $98through Licensor’s website, at factory stores and by direct mail.
3. If Licensor desires to purchase clock radios, tabletop stereos or MP3players, prior to entering into a purchase agreement for the initial purchase(as opposed to a reorder) of any such products Licensor will present a writtenrequest for quote from Licensee for the applicable products. Such requestshall include specifications, estimated quantities, target price and any otherrelevant information.
4. This Amendment has been jointly drafted by the parties, reflects the partiesmutual intent, and no terms shall be construed more or less favorably to eitherparty on the grounds that is was drafted by such party.
5. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement, as previously amendedby the parties, remains in full force and effect.    KOSS CORPORATION    By: /s/ Michael J. Koss Name: Michael J. Koss Title: CEO/President    JIANGSU ELECTRONICS INDUSTRIES LIMITED    By: /s/ Poon Ka Hung Name: Poon Ka Hung Title: Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 21-10720 

Summary Calendar 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Raul Perez, III 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:20-cr-145-3 

Before Wiener, Dennis, and Haynes, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Raul Perez, III, has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Perez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

March 10, 2022 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 21-10720 Document: 00516233658 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/10/2022
No. 21-10720 

2 

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate 

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and 

the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 21-10720 Document: 00516233658 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/10/2022
No. 51429.

#### Protests 119411-K, etc., of G. H. Mumm Champagne (S. V. C. S.) & Asso., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of the various barrels, casks, packages, etc., was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination, because of breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gaugers’ returns as verified by the affidavits of the importer. The protests were sustained to this extent.
p130465.eng INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0465 Focus Ready Draft 6/10/2013 ENGINEER: Austin \ AH PV (kg/yr): SUBMITTER: USE:

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: Chemical goggles, protective clothing impervious to this material. Respirator: No protection is ordinarily required under normal conditions of use and with adequate ventilation. Respiratory protection must be used if air contamination exceeds acceptable level. Health Effects: Eye: May cause eye irritation. Not known to cause permanent injury to eye tissue. Inhalation: No information available. Skin: Prolonged or repeated skin contact may cause irritation. Not expected to be a skin irritant. Ingestion: No information about adverse effects due to exposure. TLV/PEL: None established for PMN
CRSS :

Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (06/04/2013): Page 1p130465.eng Migration to groundwater:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0465 Page 2p130465.eng Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis: Process Description: Raw materials --> reaction --> polymerization, PMN formed --> distillation --> drumming of PMN substance (liquid, 90%) (submission) ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:
Dermal:

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0465 Page 3p130465.eng Number of Sites/ Location: Days/yr: Basis:
Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: Basis: Inhalation:
Dermal: Page 4p130465.eng

Page 5
No. 52285.

protests 110970-K, etc. (Baltimore).

#### Harmar Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of the various barrels, casks, packages, etc., was lost in transitfrom the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gaugers’ returns as verified by the affidavits of the importer. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 61841.

#### Paolo Alonge, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 211483-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of condimento similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Paolo Alonge, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 351, C. D. 1886), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.