U.S. Department of Commerce

Economics and Statistics Administration

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU

census.gov

Nevada: 2010

Population and Housing Unit Counts

2010 Census of Population and Housing

Issued August 2012

CPH-2-30

Nevada: 2010

Population and Housing Unit Counts

Issued August 2012

CPH-2-30

U.S. Department of Commerce

Rebecca M. Blank, 

Acting Secretary

Rebecca M. Blank, 

Deputy Secretary

Economics and Statistics Administration 

Vacant, 

Under Secretary 

for Economic Affairs

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU 

Thomas L. Mesenbourg, 

Acting Director
ECONOMICS

AND STATISTICS

ADMINISTRATION

SUGGESTED CITATION

U.S. Census Bureau, 

2010 Census of 

Population and Housing, 

Population and 

Housing Unit Counts,

CPH-2-30, Nevada 

U.S. Government Printing Office, 

Washington, DC, 

2012

Economics 

and Statistics 

Administration

Vacant, 

Under Secretary for 

Economic Affairs

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU

Thomas L. Mesenbourg,

Acting Director

Nancy A. Potok, 

Deputy Director and 

Chief Operating Officer

Vacant, 

Associate Director 

for Demographic Programs

Enrique J. Lamas, 

Chief, Population Division
Contents iii

List of Statistical Tables ..................................... v

How to Use This Census Report .............................. I-1

Table Finding Guide ....................................... II-1

User Notes .............................................. III-1

Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places: 2010 ..................... IV-1

Statistical Tables .......................................... 1

Appendixes

A Geographic Terms and Concepts ......................... *

B Definitions of Subject Characteristics ...................... *

C Data Collection and Processing Procedures .................. *

D Questionnaire ........................................ *

E Maps .............................................. E-1

F Operational Overview and Accuracy of the Data .............. *

G Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census 

 of the United States .................................. *

H Acknowledgments .................................... *

*Appendix may be found in the separate volume, CPH-2-A, Population and Housing 

Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, in print and on the Internet at <www.census.gov 

/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>.

CONTENTS

List of Statistical Tables v

LIST Of 

STATISTICAL 

TAbLES

Table 

no. Title Page

1. Population: Earliest Census to 2010; and Housing Units: 

1950 to 2010 ..................................... 1

 State, Urban and Rural

2. Population, Housing Units, and Land Area by Urban and 

Rural and Size of Urban Area: 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

 State, Urban and Rural, Size of Urban Area [Population]

3. Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010 ... 4

 State, Size of Place [Population]

4. Population and Housing Units: 1970 to 2010 ............ 6

 State, County/County Equivalent

5. Population, Housing Units, Land Area, and Density: 2010; 

and Percent Change: 1980 to 2010 .................... 7

 State, County/County Equivalent

6. Rank of Counties by Percent Change in Population: 

2000 to 2010 ...................................... 8

 County/County Equivalent

7. Population by Urban and Rural: 2010 .................. 9

 State, County/County Equivalent

8. Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area 

Measurements and Density: 2010 .................... 10

 State, County/County Equivalent, County Subdivision, Place

9. Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area 

Measurements and Density: 2010 .................... 14

 State, Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

10. Rank by 2010 Population and Housing Units: 

2000 and 2010 .................................... 18

 Place [2,500 or More Population]

11. Rank of Places by Percent Change in Population: 

2000 to 2010 ...................................... 19

 Place [2,500 or More Population]

12. Population and Housing Units for Urban Areas: 2010 ..... 20

 State, Urbanized Area, Urban Cluster

How to Use This Census Report I-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

How to Use This Census Report

CONTENTS

Page

Introduction .................................................................. I-1

How to Find Geographic Areas and Subject Matter Data ................................. I-2

How to Use the Statistical Tables ................................................... I-2

Graphics ..................................................................... I-5

User Notes ................................................................... I-5

Appendixes .................................................................. I-5

INTRODUCTION

Data from the 2010 Census for the United States and Puerto Rico are presented in two printed report series 

and a single report for American Indians and Alaska Natives by tribe:

1. CPH-1, Summary Population and Housing Characteristics

2. CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts

3. CPH-3, Characteristics of American Indians and Alaska Natives by Tribe 

The data from the 2010 Census were derived from a limited number of basic questions asked of the entire 

population and about every housing unit. Appendix D (see Selected Appendixes report at <www.census 

.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>) presents a facsimile of the questionnaire pages used to collect the data 

included in this report. Note that the “long form” data included in previous censuses are not included in 

the 2010 Census. 

The CPH-1, Summary Population and Housing Characteristics, report series provides data based on age, 

Hispanic or Latino origin, household relationship, race, sex, tenure (owner- or renter-occupied), and 

vacancy characteristics. Land area measurements and population density also are provided. This series is 

similar to the Census 2000 PHC-1 series. 

The CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts, report series provides 2010 Census and historical comparisons of the population and housing unit counts. It also provides area measurements and density. The 

user notes section documents geographic changes over the past decade. This series is similar to the 

Census 2000 PHC-3 series. 

In each series, there is one report for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, plus a United 

States summary report. Many tables in the United States summary reports include data for Puerto Rico. 

The CPH-3, Characteristics of American Indians and Alaska Natives by Tribe, report provides population 

and housing information for selected American Indian and Alaska Native tribes. This report is similar to the 

Census 2000 PHC-5 report. This is a single report covering the entire United States. 
I-2 How to Use This Census Report

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

HOW TO FIND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS AND SUBJECT MATTER DATA

This report includes a table finding guide to assist the user in locating those statistical tables that contain 

the desired data. The table finding guide lists alphabetically, by geographic area, the subjects shown in 

this report. To determine which tables in this report show data for a particular topic, find the subject in the 

left-hand column of the table finding guide and then look across the columns using the headings at the top 

for the desired type of geographic area. Figure I-1 is an example of a table finding guide. 

The table finding guide does not include cross-classification of subject-matter items. Additional information to locate data within specific reports is provided in the headnote at the top of the table finding guide 

and in the footnotes at the bottom of the guide. 

Figure I-1.

Geographic area

Population Housing units Area 

measurement

Average per square 

mile of land (density)

Number of 

 2010 Census places

Previous 

censuses

Change 

from 

previous 

census 2010 Census

Previous 

censuses

Change 

from 

previous 

census Total area Land area Population

Housing 

units

THE STATE1 

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 1,2,4,5,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 8,9 2,5,8,9 5,8,9 5,8,9 1,3 Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 – – 3 Current urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 – – – 1950–90 urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 – – – – – Urban and rural by size of place . . . . . . . 3 – – – – – – – – – 3 In urbanized area and in urban cluster . . 2,7,12 – – 2,12 – – – 2 – – – Size of urban area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 – – 2 – – – 2 – – – In place and not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,7 – – – – – – – – – 3

COUNTY2

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,5,6,8 4,6,8 5,6 4,8 4,8 5 8 5,8 5,8 5,8 – Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 – – – – – – – – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6 6 – – – – – – – –

COUNTY SUBDIVISION3

By county . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 8 8 – Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 – By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10a 10a – 10a 10a – – – – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11a 11a 11a – – – – – – – –

PLACE

By county and county subdivision . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 8 8 – Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 – By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 10 – 10 10 – – – – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 11 11 – – – – – – – –

URBAN AREA

Urbanized area and urban cluster . . . . . . 12 – 12 – – – – – – – –

1

 State, District of Columbia, or Puerto Rico .

2

 Parish in Louisiana; city and borough, municipality, borough, or census area in Alaska; and municipio in Puerto Rico; in Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia, one or more cities 

are independent of counties and are treated as statistical equivalents of counties; the entire District of Columbia, which has no counties, is treated as a county equivalent . 3

 County subdivisions within the state are shown alphabetically with places for the following 12 states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, 

New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin .

Table Finding Guide

SUBJECTS BY TYPE OF GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND TABLE NUMBER

The types of geographic areas covered in this report are shown on the side, and subjects are shown at the top. See CPH-2-A, Population and 

Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes (<www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>), for a description of area classifications (Appendix A) 

and for definitions and explanations of subject characteristics (Appendix B).

Table Finding Guide II-1U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

HOW TO USE THE STATISTICAL TABLES

Parts of a Statistical Table

The census data included in printed reports are arranged in tables. Each table includes four major parts: (1) 

heading, (2) boxhead, (3) stub, and (4) data field. A typical census report table is illustrated in Figure I-2.

The heading consists of the table number, title, and headnote. The table number indicates the position of 

the table within the report, while the title is a brief statement indicating the subjects and time reference 

of the data presented in the table. The headnote is enclosed in brackets and is located under the title. It 

contains statements that qualify, explain, or provide information pertaining to the entire table. 
How to Use This Census Report I-3

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

The boxhead is under the heading. This portion of the table, which contains the individual column heads 

or captions, describes the data in each vertical column. In the boxhead of many tables, a spanner appears 

across and above two or more column heads or across two or more lower spanners. The purpose of a 

spanner is to classify or qualify items below it or separate the table into identifiable blocks in terms of 

major aspects of the data. 

The stub is located at the left edge of the table. It includes a listing of line or row captions or descriptions. 

At the top of the stub is the stubhead. The stubhead is considered to be an extension of the table title and 

usually shows generic geographic area designations and restrictions. 

Race in combination with one or more other races Race alone or in combination with one or more other races

Asian

Native

Hawaiian

and Other

Pacic

Islander

American

Indian

and

Alaska

Native

Some

Other Race

Black or

African

White American White

Black or

African

American

American

Indian

and

Alaska

Native Asian

Native

Hawaiian

and Other

Pacic

Islander

Some

Other Race

Table 6.

[For information on condentiality protection, nonsampling error, and denitions, see Selected Appendixes at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-1-a.pdf>]

Population for Selected Categories of Race: 2010

State

County

Place

 Delaware......................................................... 18,775 14,109 5,718 5,152 816 5,026 637,392 205,923 9,899 33,701 1,216 35,545

COUNTY

 Kent County......................................................... 4,523 3,595 1,558 1,215 215 838 114,522 42,508 2,601 4,521 306 4,073

 New Castle County............................................ 10,502 7,949 2,895 3,333 409 3,171 363,457 135,735 4,469 26,633 568 22,286

 Sussex County..................................................... 3,750 2,565 1,265 604 192 1,017 159,413 27,680 2,829 2,547 342 9,186

PLACE

 Arden village, New Castle County................. 3 1 12 0 1 428 6 3 3 0 3

 Ardencroft village, New Castle County.......... 1 0 01 0 0 199 21 0 0 12 0

 Ardentown village, New Castle County......... 8 2 05 0 2 256 4 1 0 0 1 2

 Bear CDP, New Castle County........................ 522 447 149 132 11 201 10,298 7,129 211 944 16 1,527

 Bellefonte town, New Castle County............. 13 5 25 2 7 1,096 80 4 3 19 9

 Bethany Beach town, Sussex County........... 5 3 11 0 0 1,054 5 5 1 0 0

 Bethel town, Sussex County........................... 2 2 00 0 0 164 8 1 0 0 0

 Blades town, Sussex County............................ 45 46 6 0 3 7 802 391 15 10 3 74

 Bowers town, Kent County............................. 3 1 11 0 1 318 7 5 4 0 5

 Bridgeville town, Sussex County................... 62 51 16 8 5 12 1,391 545 19 14 7 152

 Brookside CDP, New Castle County............. 445 325 118 80 35 125 10,218 3,070 172 529 37 912

 Camden town, Kent County............................ 124 104 49 52 0 13 2,413 920 60 180 1 63

 Cheswold town, Kent County........................ 50 32 32 12 10 13 793 497 68 46 10 47

 Claymont CDP, New Castle County.............. 149 112 34 32 5 25 5,435 2,344 62 347 14 240

 Clayton town........................................................ 73 73 21 16 1 13 2,105 791 27 33 1 63

 Kent County (part)............................................ 73 73 21 16 1 13 2,105 791 27 33 1 63

 New Castle County (part).............................. 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 Dagsboro town, Sussex County.................... 17 16 4 3 0 2 706 69 12 3 0 36

 Delaware City city, New Castle County.......... 64 46 16 5 0 5 1,473 231 17 22 0 20

 Delmar town, Sussex County.......................... 75 67 21 7 1 4 1,281 344 27 18 1 19

 Dewey Beach town, Sussex County............. 4 3 00 1 0 318 12 1 3 1 10

 Dover city, Kent County................................... 1,053 1,097 375 328 52 195 18,446 16,312 571 1,310 75 960

 Dover Base Housing CDP, Kent County........ 216 122 47 85 23 37 2,699 580 55 163 32 200

 Edgemoor CDP, New Castle County............ 99 115 39 9 1 16 3,499 2,089 58 72 1 99

 Ellendale town, Sussex County..................... 8 13 6 3 2 0 242 125 6 4 5 15

 Elsmere town, New Castle County................ 165 123 44 33 0 116 4,435 925 92 139 0 786

 Farmington town, Kent County........................ 0 0 00 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0

 Felton town, Kent County................................. 48 38 12 3 0 12 998 290 20 25 1 23

 Fenwick Island town, Sussex County............ 1 0 10 0 0 371 2 3 1 0 3

 Frankford town, Sussex County.................... 10 11 4 0 2 5 407 249 4 2 11 190

 Frederica town, Kent County......................... 32 33 14 2 0 7 558 183 14 9 1 57

 Georgetown town, Sussex County................ 200 85 51 8 2 133 3,191 1,018 328 78 11 2,038

 Glasgow CDP, New Castle County................ 312 276 71 121 6 67 9,505 3,862 119 937 10 309

 Greenville CDP, New Castle County............. 24 10 3 22 0 6 2,018 121 3 0 190 28

 Greenwood town, Sussex County................. 28 12 17 5 0 0 718 211 17 11 0 48

 Harrington city, Kent County......................... 120 102 55 15 10 15 2,568 931 76 43 14 94

 Hartly town, Kent County.................................. 0 0 00 0 0 72 0 0 1 1 0

 Henlopen Acres town, Sussex County.......... 0 0 00 0 0 118 3 1 0 0 0

 Highland Acres CDP, Kent County................ 96 71 24 44 7 14 2,725 579 45 189 10 45

 Hockessin CDP, New Castle County............ 188 38 38 132 8 31 11,712 434 59 1,429 17 102

 Houston town, Kent County.......................... 2 2 01 0 1 346 22 2 0 4 3

 Kent Acres CDP, Kent County......................... 51 38 17 17 1 8 1,302 505 29 65 1 55

 Kenton town, Kent County.............................. 8 6 20 0 0 242 12 2 0 0 13

 Laurel town, Sussex County............................ 135 155 33 38 15 37 1,889 1,668 75 72 33 188

 Leipsic town, Kent County............................... 6 6 00 0 0 170 9 0 4 0 6

 Lewes city, Sussex County................................ 34 26 17 4 1 1 2,502 237 27 14 3 10

 Little Creek town, Kent County........................ 5 1 40 0 0 214 6 1 7 0 1

 Long Neck CDP, Sussex County.................... 6 3 50 0 1 1,896 44 10 7 0 31

 Magnolia town, Kent County......................... 7 2 42 0 1 182 28 14 3 0 6

 Middletown town, New Castle County........... 457 405 107 132 19 131 12,145 5,772 143 841 27 597

 Milford city............................................................ 189 176 65 27 23 60 6,404 2,304 115 137 45 838

 Kent County (part)............................................ 93 91 24 8 8 41 1,906 1,526 53 46 13 374

 Sussex County (part)....................................... 96 85 41 19 15 19 4,498 778 62 91 32 464

 Millsboro town, Sussex County..................... 90 97 29 20 7 23 2,863 792 49 149 7 154

 Millville town, Sussex County........................ 9 1 17 0 0 515 14 1 0 11 12

 Milton town, Sussex County............................ 75 76 20 3 0 12 2,027 497 38 18 1 92

 Newark city, New Castle County................... 626 318 141 325 31 112 26,532 2,412 194 2,570 41 519

 New Castle city, New Castle County............. 101 95 39 19 2 31 3,660 1,530 57 80 2 105

 Newport town, New Castle County................ 29 26 6 5 2 9 744 220 9 2 21 100

 North Star CDP, New Castle County............. 83 20 8 61 0 27 7,066 270 11 687 0 48

 Ocean View town, Sussex County................ 17 8 65 1 3 1,835 24 7 1 29 8

 Odessa town, New Castle County.................. 12 10 4 5 0 2 334 35 4 0 9 2

20 Delaware Summary Population and Housing Characteristics

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Figure I-2.

PARTS OF A STATISTICAL TABLE

Table number and title Headnote

Heading

Stubhead

Stub

Sidehead

State name and

page number Report title

Spanner

Column head

Boxhead

Data 

field
I-4 How to Use This Census Report

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

In the stub, several features are used to help the user better understand the contents of the table. Usually, 

a block of data lines is preceded by a sidehead. The sidehead, similar to a spanner, describes and classifies 

the stub entries following it. The use of indentation in a stub indicates the relationship of one data line to 

another. Indented data lines represent subcategories that, in most instances, sum to a total. Occasionally 

in tables, it is desirable to show one or more single-line subcategories that do not sum to the total. 

The data field is that part of the statistical table that contains the data. It extends from the bottom of the 

boxhead to the bottom of the table and from the right of the stub to the right edge of the page. 

Both geographic and subject-matter terms appear in tables. It is important to read the definitions of the 

terms used in the tables because census terms often are defined in special ways that reflect the manner in 

which the questions were asked and the data were tabulated. Definitions of geographic terms are provided 

in Appendix A of CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes (<www.census.gov 

/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>). Census tables often include derived measures such as medians, means, percentages, and ratios. These and other subject-matter terms are defined in Appendix B of the same report. 

Symbols and Geographic Abbreviations

The following symbols are used in the tables and explanations of subjects covered in 2010 Census reports:

• A dash ‘‘–’’ represents zero or a derived measure that rounds to less than 0.1. 

• (X) means not applicable. In the 1990 and earlier decennial census reports, three dots ‘‘. . . ’’ meant not 

applicable. 

• (NA) means not available. 

• The superscript prefix ‘‘r’’ indicates that a Census 2000 count has been revised since the publication 

of the Census 2000 reports as a result of certified Count Question Resolution (CQR) changes (see also 

<www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/notes/errata.pdf>). This symbol appears only in the 2010 Census 

CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts, report series. 

• A minus sign ‘‘–’’ preceding a figure denotes decrease. The minus sign appears only in the 2010 Census 

CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts, report series. 

The following are examples of geographic abbreviations and terms that may be used in the tables in this 

report:

• A ‘‘(part)’’ next to the name of a geographic area in a hierarchical presentation indicates that the geographic entity is located only partially in the superior geographic entity. For example, a ‘‘(part)’’ next to a 

place name in a county subdivision-place hierarchy indicates that the place is located in more than one 

county subdivision. (Places also may be ‘‘split’’ by county, congressional district, urban/rural, metropolitan area, voting district, and other geographic boundaries, depending on the presentation.) Other geographic entities also can be ‘‘split’’ by a higher-level entity. The exception is a tabulation block, which is 

unique within all geographic entities in census products. 

• ANVSA is Alaska Native village statistical area. 

• ANRC is Alaska Native Regional Corporation. 

• CCD is census county division. 

• CDP is census designated place. 

• CSA is combined statistical area. 

• NECTA is New England city and town area. 

• Metro Area is metropolitan statistical area. 
How to Use This Census Report I-5

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

• Micro Area is micropolitan statistical area. 

• OTSA is Oklahoma tribal statistical area. 

• SDTSA is state designated tribal statistical area. 

• TDSA is tribal designated statistical area. 

• UT is unorganized territory. 

GRAPHICS

Charts, statistical maps, and other graphic summaries are included in some 2010 Census reports. 

USER NOTES

User notes include general explanatory information, historical notes, and geographic notes. They also provide information about unique characteristics of the report and sometimes changes or corrections made 

too late to be reflected in the text or tables themselves. However, sometimes this information becomes 

available too late to be reflected even in the user notes. Therefore, updates are available in the Notes and 

Errata document at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/notes/errata.pdf>. 

APPENDIXES

Appendixes A through D, and F through H, described below, are in the separate printed volume, CPH-2-A, 

Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, or on the Internet at <www.census.gov/prod 

/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>. Appendix E is included in this report. 

Appendix A, Geographic Terms and Concepts. Provides definitions of the types of geographic areas 

and related information used in census products. 

Appendix B, Definitions of Subject Characteristics. Contains definitions for the subject-matter terms 

used in census products, including explanations of derived measures, limitations of the data, and comparability with previous censuses. The subjects are listed alphabetically. Population characteristics are 

defined first, followed by the definitions of the housing subjects. 

Appendix C, Data Collection and Processing Procedures. Explains the 2010 Census mission and 

scope and provides thumbnail descriptions of 2010 Census operations. 

Appendix D, Questionnaire. Presents a facsimile of the 2010 Census questionnaire used to collect the 

data in this report. 

Appendix E, Maps. Contains maps depicting the geographic areas shown in this report. 

Appendix F, Operational Overview and Accuracy of the Data. Provides information on 2010 Census 

operations, including group quarters enumeration, confidentiality of the data, imputation of housing unit 

status and population counts, sources of errors in the data, and data editing. 

Appendix G, Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census of the United States. 

Contains a description of the residence rule and residence situations used by Census Bureau staff to 

guide decisions on where people should be counted in the 2010 Census. This document is the basis for 

residence-related sections of questionnaires, collection instruments, field materials, and training materials. 

Appendix H, Acknowledgments. Lists many of the U.S. Census Bureau staff who participated in report 

preparation. 

Table Finding Guide II-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Table finding Guide SUBJECTS BY TYPE OF GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND TABLE NUMBER The types of geographic areas covered in this report are shown on the side, and subjects are shown at the top. See CPH-2-

Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes (<www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>), for a description of area classiand for definitions and explanations of subject characteristics (Appendix B).

Geographic area

Population Housing units Area measurement Av

mi

 2010 Census 

Previous 

censuses

Change 

from 

previous 

census 2010 Census

Previous 

censuses

Change 

from 

previous 

census Total area Land area Po

THE STATE1 

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 1,2,4,5,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 8,9 2,5,8,9 

Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 Current urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 1950–90 urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 – – Urban and rural by size of place . . . . . . . 3 – – – – – – – In urbanized area and in urban cluster . . 2,7,12 – – 2,12 – – – 2 Size of urban area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 – – 2 – – – 2 In place and not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . .COUNTY2

3,7 – – – – – – – 

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,5,6,8 4,6,8 5,6 4,8 4,8 5 8 5,8 Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 – – – – – – – 

By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . .COUNTY SUBDIVISION3

6 6 6 – – – – – 

By county . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10a 10a – 10a 10a – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . .PLACE

11a 11a 11a – – – – – 

By county and county subdivision . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 10 – 10 10 – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . .URBAN AREA

11 11 11 – – – – – 

Urbanized area and urban cluster . . . . . . 12 – 12 – – – – – 

1 State, District of Columbia, or Puerto Rico .2 Parish in Louisiana; city and borough, municipality, borough, or census area in Alaska; and municipio in Puerto Rico; in Maryland, Missouri, Nevada

are independent of counties and are treated as statistical equivalents of counties; the entire District of Columbia, which has no counties, is treated as a c

3 County subdivisions within the state are shown alphabetically with places for the following 12 states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, 

New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin .

User Notes III-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

User Notes

Additional information concerning this 2010 Census product may become available after this report is 

published. This information, called Notes and Errata, is available in portable document format (PDF) on the 

U.S. Census Bureau’s Internet site at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/notes/errata.pdf>.

GENERAL NOTES

User Note 1

The user should be aware that there are limitations to many of these data. Please refer to the text provided 

with this report for further explanation of the limitations of the data. The population and other data shown 

for the 2010 Census in this report are as of April 1, 2010; the boundaries used for all geographic entities 

are as of January 1, 2010. All boundaries are intended for Census Bureau statistical data collection and presentation only; their depiction and designation for statistical purposes do not constitute a determination of 

jurisdictional authority or entitlement. Corrections to the 2010 Census data as a result of certified Count 

Question Resolution (CQR) changes are available from the Census Bureau’s Internet site at <www.census 

.gov/prod/cen2010/notes/errata.pdf>.

User Note 2

Data comparability for county subdivisions is shown only when the county subdivision contains substantially the same territory as reported for Census 2000 (generally defined as at least 60 percent of the 

previous territory). There is no comparability provided for county subdivisions that have been extensively 

revised. Revised entities are noted by and within county. Changes to a geographic entity can be the result 

of legal change actions, statistical redefinition, correction of previous boundary or drafting errors, or new 

erroneous information.

Incorporated place and census designated place (CDP) comparability is provided for all places that retained 

their name or general area without regard to the amount of territorial change between censuses. Place 

comparability is not shown if the entity is new for the 2010 Census or is the result of a merger that created an entirely new entity, or if a 2010 Census geographic area shares no area with a Census 2000 area 

of the same name. American Indian area (including tribal subdivisions), Alaska Native area, and Hawaiian 

home land comparability follows the same rules as for place comparability.

User Note 3

When applicable, tables show the revised Census 2000 population and/or housing unit counts that 

resulted from the Count Question Resolution (CQR) program. These revised counts are accompanied by a 

prefix “r” symbol in the data tables.

Derived values (e.g., percent distribution, density, or change) that are calculated from Census 2000 population or housing unit counts only account for the aforementioned CQR revisions in certain cases. 

• Calculations include the corrected Census 2000 counts when a table:

o Shows population or housing unit change (or percent change) from 2000 to 2010.

o Shows population or housing unit change (or percent change) from 1990 to 2000, and also shows 

the 2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from.

o Shows population or housing unit density or percent distribution in 2000, and also shows the 2000 

population or housing unit count that it is derived from.
III-2 User Notes

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

• Calculations do not include the corrected Census 2000 counts when a table:

o Shows population or housing unit change (or percent change) from 1990 to 2000, but does not 

show the 2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from.

o Shows population or housing unit density or percent distribution in 2000, but does not show the 

2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from. 

• When a table shows component parts of a revised 2000 population or housing unit count (e.g., classified by urban/rural or by size of place), the component parts may not sum to the total population 

or housing unit count, because the component parts were not revised during the 2000 CQR program. 

Therefore, any derived values (e.g., percent distribution or number of places by population size) for the 

component parts cannot account for the revised Census 2000 counts either.

HISTORICAL NOTES

The United States acquired the area of Nevada from Mexico in 1848 and primarily included in Utah 

Territory with a small part in New Mexico Territory when each was organized in 1850. Nevada Territory 

was organized from the western part of Utah Territory on March 2, 1861. The territory added area along 

the eastern boundary from Utah Territory in 1862. Nevada was admitted to the Union on October 31, 

1864, as the 36th state. In 1866, additional territory on the east and southeast was added from Utah and 

Arizona territories, and the state assumed generally the same boundary as the present state.

Although the territory had not yet been legally established, census data for Nevada are available beginning with the 1860 census. The 1860 census population is for the area of present-day Nevada formed 

from Utah Territory. The portion of present-day Nevada then in New Mexico Territory was not enumerated 

in 1860. The population of the entire legally established Utah Territory (of which the area of Nevada was 

a part) in 1860 was 47,130. For an explanation of the revision to the 1870 population of Nevada, see 

Richard L. Forstall, Population of States and Counties of the United States: 1790-1990, Washington, DC: 

U.S. Government Printing Office, 1996, page 104.

GEOGRAPHIC NOTES

Nevada is divided into 16 counties and one county equivalent. Carson City is an independent city not 

within any county, and the Census Bureau treats it as equivalent to a county for data presentation purposes. The 71 county subdivisions in the state are census county divisions (CCDs), which are statistical 

subdivisions delineated for presentation of decennial census data.

There are 19 incorporated places and 110 CDPs in Nevada. Incorporated places in the state are legally 

described as cities, except for Carson City, which has no legal description. The Census Bureau treats all 

incorporated places and CDPs as dependent within CCDs.

GEOGRAPHIC CHANGE NOTES

The Geographic Change Notes listed below document high-level geographic entities—American Indian 

areas, Alaska Native areas, and Hawaiian home lands; counties and their equivalents; county subdivisions; and places—that are different from the information reported in Census 2000. The notes identify 

geographic entities whose name, legal description, and/or boundary have changed, entities that no longer 

exist, newly established entities (both legal and statistical), and changes in geographic relationships, such 

as places that exist in one county and have expanded into or withdrawn from another county (the notes 

do not identify the other county(ies) in which the entity exists; this can be determined from Table 9 of 

this publication), places that have been removed from comparable 2000 county subdivisions, and places 

that have become independent of or dependent within one or more county subdivisions. The changes 

are reported by and within county; counties without changes are not shown in the listing. Changes to 

American Indian areas, Alaska Native areas, and Hawaiian home lands appear after the list of counties; 

areas with no changes are not shown. A few of the reported changes in name, legal status, or legal relationship may be incorrect; if so, the correct version is shown in any Correction Notes section above. Some 
User Notes III-3

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

changes are the result of legal actions that took place prior to Census 2000 but were not reported in 

that census.

For the 2010 Census, the notes reflect any boundary change that affects a geographic entity, regardless 

of whether it is the result of legal action, redefinition of a statistical entity, correction of a previous drafting error, or new erroneous information. Between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census, the Census Bureau 

invested in improving the coordinate accuracy of its geographic database. As a result, the geographic 

positions of boundaries may be different between the two censuses even though little or no change actually occurred to the boundaries. In compiling the Geographic Change Notes, the Census Bureau inspected 

the many corrections to determine if a change actually affected significant land area or population. For 

example, the county-level text ‘‘all MCDs [minor civil divisions] revised’’ may reflect a legal redistricting of 

all county subdivisions in the county, a major or minor relocation of county subdivision boundaries due 

to more accurate mapping or more accurate boundary information, or a combination of these that, in one 

way or another, affect every county subdivision in a county. Boundary corrections that resulted in incorporated places gaining or losing territory are shown as annexations or detachments even if no legal action 

occurred between 2000 and 2010. Most places shown with a detachment resulted from such corrections. 

In states whose legal entities rarely undergo a legal boundary change, such as the New England states, 

most of the entities reported to have annexed, detached, exchanged, gained, or lost territory did so as the 

result of mapping changes, not legal actions. The extent and location of the boundary changes affecting 

any particular entity can be determined by comparing the TIGER/Line® Shapefiles, Cartographic Boundary 

Files, or a comparable set of maps for the 2000 and 2010 censuses.

Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places

Churchill County—Annexations: Fallon city.

Clark County—County Changes: Clark CCD, Clark County, lost area to Pahrump CCD, Nye County; CCD 

Changes: Clark CCD exchanged area with Las Vegas CCD; Annexations: Boulder City, Henderson, Las 

Vegas, Mesquite, and North Las Vegas cities; Detachments: Henderson (to Paradise CDP), Las Vegas, 

and Mesquite cities; New CDPs: Nelson; CDP Changes: Bunkerville CDP part annexed to Mesquite city; 

Enterprise CDP part annexed to Henderson city and lost additional area; Indian Springs CDP lost area; 

Nellis AFB CDP part annexed to North Las Vegas city and lost area to Sunrise Manor CDP; Paradise CDP 

gained area detached from Henderson city, gained additional area, and part annexed to Henderson city; 

Spring Valley CDP gained area, lost area to Summerlin South CDP, and lost additional area; Summerlin 

South CDP gained area from Spring Valley CDP, gained additional area, and lost area; Sunrise Manor CDP 

gained area from Nellis AFB CDP, gained additional area, part annexed to North Las Vegas city, lost area to 

Whitney CDP, and lost additional area; Whitney CDP gained area from Sunrise Manor CDP, gained additional 

area, part annexed to Henderson city, and lost additional area; Deleted Relationships: Spring Valley CDP 

removed from Clark CCD.

Douglas County—CCD Changes: Gardnerville-Minden CCD gained area from Pine Nut CCD; New CDPs:

Carter Springs, Double Spring, East Valley, Fish Springs, Genoa, Glenbrook, Lakeridge, Logan Creek, Round 

Hill Village (formed from part of deleted Zephyr Cove-Round Hill Village CDP); Ruhenstroth, Skyland, 

Topaz Lake, Topaz Ranch Estates, and Zephyr Cove (formed from part of deleted Zephyr Cove-Round Hill 

Village CDP); Deleted CDPs: Zephyr Cove-Round Hill Village (split to form Round Hill Village and Zephyr 

Hill CDPs); CDP Changes: Gardnerville Ranchos, Indian Hills, and Johnson Lane CDPs gained area; Deleted 

Relationships: Indian Hills CDP removed from Gardnerville-Minden CCD.

Elko County—Annexations: Carlin, Elko, and Wells cities; New CDPs: Jackpot, Lamoille, Montello, Oasis, 

and Osino.

Esmeralda County—Name Changes: Silver Peak CCD name corrected from Silverpeak; New CDPs: Dyer, 

Goldfield, and Silver Peak.

Eureka County—New CDPs: Crescent Valley and Eureka.
III-4 User Notes

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Humboldt County—Name Changes: Fort McDermitt CDP name changed from McDermitt; CCD Changes:

Winnemucca CCD gained area from Golconda CCD; Annexations: Winnemucca city; Detachments:

Winnemucca city; New CDPs: Denio, Golconda, McDermitt [Note: New McDermitt CDP contains no area in 

the 2000 McDermitt CDP], Orovada, Paradise Valley, and Valmy; CDP Changes: Fort McDermitt CDP gained 

area; Deleted Relationships: Winnemucca city removed from Golconda CCD due to CCD boundary change.

Lander County—New CDPs: Austin and Kingston; CDP Changes: Battle Mountain CDP gained area.

Lincoln County—CCD Changes: Alamo CCD gained area from Caliente CCD; New CDPs: Alamo, Beaverdam, 

Bennett Springs, Dry Valley, Hiko, Mount Wilson, Panaca, Pioche, Rachel, and Ursine.

Lyon County—County Changes: Fernley CCD, Lyon County, gained area from Pyramid Lake CCD, Washoe 

County; Incorporations: Fernley city in 2001 (formed from parts of Fernley and Silver Springs CDPs and 

additional area); CCD Changes: Fernley CCD gained area from Silver Springs CCD; Yerington CCD gained 

area from Smith Valley CCD; Annexations: Fernley and Yerington cities; New CDPs: Stagecoach; Deleted 

CDPs: Fernley (incorporated); CDP Changes: Silver Springs CDP part incorporated into Fernley city.

Mineral County—CCD Changes: Hawthorne CCD gained area from Walker River CCD; New CDPs: Mina 

and Walker Lake; CDP Changes: Hawthorne CDP gained area; Schurz CDP lost area; Deleted Relationships:

Schurz CDP removed from Hawthorne CCD.

Nye County—Name Changes: Ralston Valley CCD name changed from Ralston; County Changes: Pahrump 

CCD gained area from Clark CCD, Clark County; CCD Changes: Beatty CCD exchanged area with Yucca Flat 

CCD; Crystal CCD merged into Pahrump CCD; Disincorporations: Gabbs city in 2001 (defined as a CDP in 

substantively smaller boundaries for 2010); New CDPs: Gabbs (formed from part of disincorporated Gabbs 

city and additional area).

Pershing County—CCD Changes: Lovelock CCD gained area from Imlay CCD; Annexations: Lovelock city; 

New CDPs: Grass Valley, Humboldt River Ranch, and Imlay.

Storey County—New CDPs: Virginia City.

Washoe County—County Changes: Pyramid Lake CCD, Washoe County, lost area to Fernley CCD, Lyon 

County; CCD Changes: Incline Village CCD exchanged area with Reno Southwest CCD; North Valleys CCD 

exchanged area with Verdi CCD and lost area to Reno North CCD; Pyramid Lake CCD gained area from 

Warm Springs-Truckee Canyon CCD; Reno North CCD gained area from North Valleys CCD; Reno Southwest 

exchanged area with Incline Village CCD and lost area to Verdi and Washoe Valley CCDs; Sparks CCD 

exchanged area with Warm Springs-Truckee Canyon CCD; Sun Valley CCD exchanged area with Warm 

Springs-Truckee Canyon CCD; Verdi CCD gained area from Reno Southwest CCD and exchanged area 

with North Valleys CCD; Warm Springs-Truckee Canyon CCD exchanged area with Sparks and Sun Valley 

CCDs and lost area to Pyramid Lake CCD; Washoe Valley CCD gained area from Reno Southwest CCD; 

Annexations: Reno and Sparks cities; Detachments: Reno and Sparks (including part to Reno city) cities; 

New CDPs: Crystal Bay (formed from part of deleted Incline Village-Crystal Bay CDP), Empire (formed from 

part of deleted Gerlach-Empire CDP), Gerlach (formed from part of deleted Gerlach-Empire CDP), Golden 

Valley (formed from part of deleted Lemmon Valley-Golden Valley CDP), Incline Village (formed from part 

of deleted Incline Village-Crystal Bay CDP), Lemmon Valley (formed from part of deleted Lemmon ValleyGolden Valley CDP), Mogul (formed from part of deleted Verdi-Mogul CDP and additional area), Verdi 

(formed from part of deleted Verdi-Mogul CDP), and Washoe Valley; Deleted CDPs: Gerlach-Empire (split 

to form Empire and Gerlach CDPs), Incline Village-Crystal Bay (split to form Crystal Bay and Incline Village 

CDPs), Lemmon Valley-Golden Valley (part annexed to Reno city and remainder taken to form Golden Valley 

and Lemmon Valley CDPs), and Verdi-Mogul (part annexed to Reno city and remainder taken to form Verdi 

CDP and part of Mogul CDP); CDP Changes: Cold Springs CDP part annexed to Reno city and lost additional 

area; Spanish Springs CDP part annexed to Sparks city; Sun Valley CDP part annexed to Reno city.

White Pine County—Annexations: Ely city; New CDPs: Baker, Lund, Preston, and Ruth.
User Notes III-5

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

American Indian Areas

Ely Reservation—Gained area in White Pine County.

Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Colony and Off-Reservation Trust Land—Reservation portion part converted to offreservation trust land in Churchill County; Added additional off-reservation trust land in Churchill and 

Lyon Counties.

Fort McDermitt Indian Reservation (part)—Name corrected from Fort McDermitt Reservation.

Las Vegas Indian Colony—Name corrected from Las Vegas Colony.

Lovelock Indian Colony—Name corrected from Lovelock Colony.

Moapa River Indian Reservation—Name corrected from Moapa River Reservation.

Pyramid Lake Paiute Reservation—Name changed from Pyramid Lake Reservation; Gained area in Lyon, 

Storey, and Washoe Counties.

Reno-Sparks Indian Colony—Name corrected from Reno-Sparks Colony; Gained and lost area in Washoe 

County.

Stewart Community—Lost area in Douglas County.

Summit Lake Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land—Added off-reservation trust land in Humboldt 

County.

Timbi-Sha Shoshone Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land (part)—New area for 2010 in Esmeralda 

and Nye Counties.

Washoe Ranches Trust Land (part)—New area for 2010 in Carson City and Douglas and Lyon Counties.

Winnemucca Indian Colony—Name corrected from Winnemucca Colony.

Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places IV-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places: 2010

Urban Area Place Within Urban Area

URBANIZED AREA

Carson City, NV Urbanized Area

Las Vegas--Henderson, NV Urbanized Area

Reno, NV--CA Urbanized Area (part)

URBAN CLUSTER

Battle Mountain, NV Urban Cluster

Boulder City, NV Urban Cluster

Bullhead City, AZ--NV Urban Cluster (part)

Dayton, NV Urban Cluster

Elko, NV Urban Cluster

Ely, NV Urban Cluster

Fallon, NV Urban Cluster

Fernley, NV Urban Cluster

Gardnerville Ranchos, NV Urban Cluster

Hawthorne, NV Urban Cluster

Incline Village, NV--CA Urban Cluster (part)

Johnson Lane, NV Urban Cluster

Laughlin, NV Urban Cluster

Mesquite, NV--AZ Urban Cluster (part)

Moapa Valley, NV Urban Cluster

Pahrump, NV Urban Cluster

South Lake Tahoe, CA--NV Urban Cluster (part)

Spring Creek North, NV Urban Cluster

Spring Creek South, NV Urban Cluster

Washoe Valley, NV Urban Cluster

West Wendover, NV--UT Urban Cluster (part)

Winnemucca, NV Urban Cluster

Yerington, NV Urban Cluster

Carson City (part)

Indian Hills CDP (part)

Enterprise CDP (part)

Henderson city (part)

Las Vegas city (part)

Nellis AFB CDP (part)

North Las Vegas city (part)

Paradise CDP

Spring Valley CDP

Summerlin South CDP (part)

Sunrise Manor CDP (part)

Whitney CDP

Winchester CDP

Cold Springs CDP (part)

Golden Valley CDP (part)

Lemmon Valley CDP (part)

Mogul CDP (part)

Reno city (part)

Spanish Springs CDP (part)

Sparks city (part)

Sun Valley CDP (part)

Verdi CDP (part)

Battle Mountain CDP (part)

Boulder City city (part)

Laughlin CDP (part)

Dayton CDP (part)

Elko city (part)

Ely city (part)

Fallon city (part)

Fernley city (part)

Wadsworth CDP (part)

Gardnerville CDP (part)

Gardnerville Ranchos CDP (part)

Minden CDP (part)

Ruhenstroth CDP (part)

Hawthorne CDP (part)

Crystal Bay CDP (part)

Incline Village CDP (part)

Johnson Lane CDP (part)

Laughlin CDP (part)

Mesquite city (part)

Moapa Valley CDP (part)

Pahrump CDP (part)

Kingsbury CDP (part)

Round Hill Village CDP (part)

Stateline CDP (part)

Spring Creek CDP (part)

Spring Creek CDP (part)

Washoe Valley CDP (part)

West Wendover city (part)

Winnemucca city (part)

Yerington city (part)

Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 1. 

Population: Earliest Census to 2010; and Housing Units: 1950 to 2010

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Urban and Rural

State total Urban Rural Percent of total

Number

Change from 

preceding census

Number of 

places of 

2,500 or 

more Number

Change from 

preceding census

Number

Change from 

preceding census

Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Urban Rural

POPULATION

Current urban definition:

 2010 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700,551 702,294 35 .1 42 2,543,797 715,151 39 .1 156,754 –12,857 –7 .6 94 .2 5 .8

 2000 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,998,257 796,582 66 .3 44 1,828,646 778,675 74 .2 169,611 17,749 11 .7 91 .5 8 .5

 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1950–90 urban definition:

1,201,675 (X) (X) 32 1,049,971 (X) (X) 151,862 (X) (X) 87 .4 12 .6

 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,201,675 401,167 50 .1 32 1,061,444 378,497 55 .4 140,389 22,843 19 .4 88 .3 11 .7

 1980 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800,508 311,770 63 .8 24 682,947 287,611 72 .8 117,546 24,144 25 .8 85 .3 14 .7

 1970 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 488,738 203,460 71 .3 18 395,336 194,632 97 .0 93,402 8,828 10 .4 80 .9 19 .1

 1960 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285,278 125,195 78 .2 12 200,704 109,079 119 .0 84,574 16,116 23 .5 70 .4 29 .6

 1950 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pre-1950 urban definition:

 160,083 (X) (X) 10 91,625 (X) (X) 68,458 (X) (X) 57 .2 42 .8

 1960 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285,278 125,195 78 .2 11 189,165 105,086 125 .0 96,113 20,109 26 .5 66 .3 33 .7

 1950 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160,083 49,836 45 .2 8 84,079 40,788 94 .2 76,004 9,048 13 .5 52 .5 47 .5

 1940 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110,247 19,189 21 .1 5 43,291 8,827 25 .6 66,956 10,362 18 .3 39 .3 60 .7

 1930 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91,058 13,651 17 .6 5 34,464 19,210 125 .9 56,594 –5,559 –8 .9 37 .8 62 .2

 1920 (Jan . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77,407 –4,468 –5 .5 2 15,254 1,887 14 .1 62,153 –6,355 –9 .3 19 .7 80 .3

 1910 (Apr . 15) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,875 39,540 93 .4 2 13,367 6,172 85 .8 68,508 33,368 95 .0 16 .3 83 .7

 1900 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,335 –5,020 –10 .6 2 7,195 –8,829 –55 .1 35,140 3,809 12 .2 17 .0 83 .0

 1890 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47,355 –14,911 –23 .9 3 16,024 –3,329 –17 .2 31,331 –11,582 –27 .0 33 .8 66 .2

 1880 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62,266 19,325 45 .0 3 19,353 12,305 174 .6 42,913 7,020 19 .6 31 .1 68 .9

 1870 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,941 36,084 526 .2 1 7,048 7,048 (X) 35,893 29,036 423 .5 16 .4 83 .6

 1860 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

HOUSING UNITS

Current urban definition:

 6,857 (X) (X) – – (X) (X) 6,857 (X) (X) – 100 .0

 2010 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,173,814 346,357 41 .9 (X) 1,097,550 347,620 46 .4 76,264 –1,263 –1 .6 93 .5 6 .5

 2000 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 827,457 308,680 59 .5 (X) 749,930 298,568 66 .1 77,527 10,031 14 .9 90 .6 9 .4

 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1950–90 urban definition:

518,777 (X) (X) (X) 451,362 (X) (X) 67,496 (X) (X) 87 .0 13 .0

 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 518,777 178,821 52 .6 (X) 456,793 167,397 57 .8 62,065 11,512 22 .8 88 .0 12 .0

 1980 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 339,956 167,398 97 .0 (X) 289,396 151,960 110 .6 50,553 15,431 43 .9 85 .1 14 .9

 1970 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172,558 70,935 69 .8 (X) 137,436 67,057 95 .3 35,122 3,878 12 .4 79 .6 20 .4

 1960 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101,623 45,108 79 .8 (X) 70,379 38,830 123 .1 31,244 6,278 25 .1 69 .3 30 .7

 1950 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,515 (X) (X) (X) 31,549 (X) (X) 24,966 (X) (X) 55 .8 44 .2
2 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 2. 

Population, Housing Units, and Land Area by Urban and Rural and Size of Urban Area: 2010

[Areas classified by population size . For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Urban and Rural

Size of Urban Area [Population]

Population Housing units Land area Number of urban areas

Total

Percent 

distribution Total

Percent 

distribution

In square 

miles

Percent 

distribution Total

Entirely in 

state

Partly in 

state

 Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700,551 100 .0 1,173,814 100 .0 109,781 100 .0 26 20 6

 Urban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,543,797 94 .2 1,097,550 93 .5 767 0 .7 26 20 6

In urbanized area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,336,222 86 .5 999,698 85 .2 604 0 .6 3 2 1

 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,886,011 69 .8 806,755 68 .7 417 0 .4 1 1 –

 500,000 to 999,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – –

 250,000 to 499,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 392,132 14 .5 168,321 14 .3 164 0 .2 1 – 1

 100,000 to 249,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – –

 50,000 to 99,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,079 2 .2 24,622 2 .1 23 – 1 1 –

In urban cluster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207,575 7 .7 97,852 8 .3 163 0 .2 23 18 5

 25,000 to 49,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,624 1 .1 15,261 1 .3 46 – 3 1 2

 10,000 to 24,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131,360 4 .9 61,900 5 .3 83 0 .1 9 7 2

 5,000 to 9,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,437 0 .8 9,934 0 .9 14 – 4 3 1

 2,500 to 4,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,154 0 .9 10,757 0 .9 19 – 7 7 –

 Cumulative summary:

Urban area of—

 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,886,011 69 .8 806,755 68 .7 417 0 .4 1 1 –

 500,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,886,011 69 .8 806,755 68 .7 417 0 .4 1 1 –

 250,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,278,143 84 .4 975,076 83 .1 581 0 .5 2 1 1

 100,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,278,143 84 .4 975,076 83 .1 581 0 .5 2 1 1

 50,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,336,222 86 .5 999,698 85 .2 604 0 .6 3 2 1

 25,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,366,846 87 .6 1,014,959 86 .5 651 0 .6 6 3 3

 10,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,498,206 92 .5 1,076,859 91 .7 734 0 .7 15 10 5

 5,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,519,643 93 .3 1,086,793 92 .6 748 0 .7 19 13 6

 2,500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,543,797 94 .2 1,097,550 93 .5 767 0 .7 26 20 6

 Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156,754 5 .8 76,264 6 .5 109,014 99 .3 (X) (X) (X)
Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 3

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

This page is intentionally blank.
4 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 3.

Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010

[Places classified by population size . For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Total Urban

In place

State All urban places Entirely urban places Partly urban places Size of Place [Population] Percent (entirely or partly urban)

Number of of total Number of Number of Number of Not in 

Population places population Total Population places Population places Population places place

 Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700,551 129 100 .0 2,543,797 2,456,407 50 468,125 4 1,988,282 46 87,390

 In place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,549,441 129 94 .4 2,456,407 2,456,407 50 468,125 4 1,988,282 46 (X)

 Not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151,110 (X) 5 .6 87,390 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 87,390

In place of—

 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X)

 500,000 to 999,999 . . . . . . . . . . 583,756 1 21 .6 583,505 583,505 1 – – 583,505 1 (X)

 250,000 to 499,999 . . . . . . . . . . 257,729 1 9 .5 255,330 255,330 1 – – 255,330 1 (X)

 100,000 to 249,999 . . . . . . . . . . 1,141,597 6 42 .3 1,138,869 1,138,869 6 401,562 2 737,307 4 (X)

 50,000 to 99,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 145,538 2 5 .4 142,455 142,455 2 – – 142,455 2 (X)

 25,000 to 49,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 103,004 3 3 .8 95,009 95,009 3 66,563 2 28,446 1 (X)

 10,000 to 24,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,085 9 5 .6 137,281 137,281 9 – – 137,281 9 (X)

 5,000 to 9,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,643 12 3 .1 69,519 69,519 11 – – 69,519 11 (X)

 2,500 to 4,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,824 8 1 .0 26,596 26,596 8 – – 26,596 8 (X)

 2,000 to 2,499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,049 4 0 .3 1,087 1,087 1 – – 1,087 1 (X)

 1,500 to 1,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,428 5 0 .3 1,417 1,417 1 – – 1,417 1 (X)

 1,000 to 1,499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,818 14 0 .6 3,427 3,427 3 – – 3,427 3 (X)

 500 to 999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,123 16 0 .5 1,607 1,607 3 – – 1,607 3 (X)

 200 to 499 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,177 21 0 .2 305 305 1 – – 305 1 (X)

 Less than 200 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,670 27 0 .1 – – – – – – – (X)

Cumulative summary:

In place of—

 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X)

 500,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . 583,756 1 21 .6 583,505 583,505 1 – – 583,505 1 (X)

 250,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . 841,485 2 31 .2 838,835 838,835 2 – – 838,835 2 (X)

 100,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,983,082 8 73 .4 1,977,704 1,977,704 8 401,562 2 1,576,142 6 (X)

 50,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,128,620 10 78 .8 2,120,159 2,120,159 10 401,562 2 1,718,597 8 (X)

 25,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,231,624 13 82 .6 2,215,168 2,215,168 13 468,125 4 1,747,043 9 (X)

 10,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,381,709 22 88 .2 2,352,449 2,352,449 22 468,125 4 1,884,324 18 (X)

 5,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,466,352 34 91 .3 2,421,968 2,421,968 33 468,125 4 1,953,843 29 (X)

 2,500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,494,176 42 92 .4 2,448,564 2,448,564 41 468,125 4 1,980,439 37 (X)

 2,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,503,225 46 92 .7 2,449,651 2,449,651 42 468,125 4 1,981,526 38 (X)

 1,500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,511,653 51 93 .0 2,451,068 2,451,068 43 468,125 4 1,982,943 39 (X)

 1,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,528,471 65 93 .6 2,454,495 2,454,495 46 468,125 4 1,986,370 42 (X)

 500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,540,594 81 94 .1 2,456,102 2,456,102 49 468,125 4 1,987,977 45 (X)

 200 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,546,771 102 94 .3 2,456,407 2,456,407 50 468,125 4 1,988,282 46 (X)
Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 5

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 3.

Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010—Con.

[Places classified by population size . For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Rural

State 

Size of Place [Population]

Total

In place

Not in 

place

All rural places 

(entirely or partly rural) Entirely rural places Partly rural places

Population

Number of 

places Population

Number of 

places Population

Number of 

places

156,754 93,034 125 50,115 79 42,919 46 63,720 Nevada

93,034 93,034 125 50,115 79 42,919 46 (X) In place

63,720 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 63,720 Not in place

In place of––

– – – – – – – (X) 1,000,000 or more

251 251 1 – – 251 1 (X) 500,000 to 999,999

2,399 2,399 1 – – 2,399 1 (X) 250,000 to 499,999

2,728 2,728 4 – – 2,728 4 (X) 100,000 to 249,999

3,083 3,083 2 – – 3,083 2 (X) 50,000 to 99,999

7,995 7,995 1 – – 7,995 1 (X) 25,000 to 49,999

12,804 12,804 9 – – 12,804 9 (X) 10,000 to 24,999

15,124 15,124 12 5,296 1 9,828 11 (X) 5,000 to 9,999

1,228 1,228 8 – – 1,228 8 (X) 2,500 to 4,999

7,962 7,962 4 6,897 3 1,065 1 (X) 2,000 to 2,499

7,011 7,011 5 6,872 4 139 1 (X) 1,500 to 1,999

13,391 13,391 14 12,820 11 571 3 (X) 1,000 to 1,499

10,516 10,516 16 9,688 13 828 3 (X) 500 to 999

5,872 5,872 21 5,872 20 – 1 (X) 200 to 499

2,670 2,670 27 2,670 27 – – (X) Less than 200

 Cumulative summary:

In place of––

– – – – – – – (X) 1,000,000 or more

251 251 1 – – 251 1 (X) 500,000 or more

2,650 2,650 2 – – 2,650 2 (X) 250,000 or more

5,378 5,378 6 – – 5,378 6 (X) 100,000 or more

8,461 8,461 8 – – 8,461 8 (X) 50,000 or more

16,456 16,456 9 – – 16,456 9 (X) 25,000 or more

29,260 29,260 18 – – 29,260 18 (X) 10,000 or more

44,384 44,384 30 5,296 1 39,088 29 (X) 5,000 or more

45,612 45,612 38 5,296 1 40,316 37 (X) 2,500 or more

53,574 53,574 42 12,193 4 41,381 38 (X) 2,000 or more

60,585 60,585 47 19,065 8 41,520 39 (X) 1,500 or more

73,976 73,976 61 31,885 19 42,091 42 (X) 1,000 or more

84,492 84,492 77 41,573 32 42,919 45 (X) 500 or more

90,364 90,364 98 47,445 52 42,919 46 (X) 200 or more
6 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 4. 

Population and Housing Units: 1970 to 2010

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990 1980 1970 2010 2000 1990 1980 1970

 Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700,551 1,998,257 1,201,675 800,508 488,738 1,173,814 827,457 518,777 339,956 172,558

Churchill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,877 23,982 17,938 13,917 10,513 10,826 9,732 7,290 5,774 3,724

Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,951,269 1,375,765 741,368 463,087 273,288 840,343 559,799 317,134 190,607 93,047

Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,997 41,259 27,637 19,421 6,882 23,671 19,006 14,121 9,399 3,205

Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,818 45,291 33,463 17,269 13,958 19,566 18,456 13,434 7,667 5,313

Esmeralda County . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 971 1,344 777 629 850 833 966 368 422

Eureka County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,987 1,651 1,547 1,198 948 1,076 1,025 817 605 370

Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,528 16,106 12,844 9,449 6,375 7,123 6,954 5,044 3,835 2,388

Lander County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,775 5,794 6,266 4,076 2,666 2,575 2,780 2,586 1,664 907

Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,345 4,165 3,775 3,732 2,557 2,730 2,178 1,800 1,685 1,043

Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,980 34,501 20,001 13,594 8,221 22,547 14,279 8,722 5,815 2,922

Mineral County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,772 5,071 6,475 6,217 7,051 2,830 2,866 2,994 3,019 2,478

Nye County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,946 32,485 17,781 9,048 5,599 22,350 15,934 8,073 4,292 2,098

Pershing County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,753 6,693 4,336 3,408 2,670 2,464 2,389 1,908 1,414 1,121

Storey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,010 3,399 2,526 1,503 695 1,990 1,596 1,085 726 361

Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421,407 339,486 254,667 193,623 121,068 184,841 143,908 112,193 86,051 44,722

White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,030 9,181 9,264 8,167 10,150 4,498 4,439 3,982 3,664 3,339

Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,274 52,457 40,443 32,022 15,468 23,534 21,283 16,628 13,371 5,098
Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 7

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 5. 

Population, Housing Units, Land Area, and Density: 2010; and Percent Change: 1980 to 2010

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

Population

Housing 

units

Land area 

in square 

miles

Average per square 

mile of land Percent change

Population 

density

Housing 

unit 

density

Population Housing units

2000 to 

2010

1990 to 

2000

1980 to 

1990

2000 to 

2010

1990 to 

2000

1980 to 

1990

 Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700,551 1,173,814 109,781 .18 24 .6 10 .7 35 .1 66 .3 50 .1 41 .9 59 .5 52 .6

Churchill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,877 10,826 4,930 .46 5 .0 2 .2 3 .7 33 .7 28 .9 11 .2 33 .5 26 .3

Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,951,269 840,343 7,891 .43 247 .3 106 .5 41 .8 85 .6 60 .1 50 .1 76 .5 66 .4

Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,997 23,671 709 .72 66 .2 33 .4 13 .9 49 .3 42 .3 24 .5 34 .6 50 .2

Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,818 19,566 17,169 .83 2 .8 1 .1 7 .8 35 .3 93 .8 6 .0 37 .4 75 .2

Esmeralda County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 850 3,581 .88 0 .2 0 .2 –19 .4 –27 .8 73 .0 2 .0 –13 .8 162 .5

Eureka County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,987 1,076 4,175 .68 0 .5 0 .3 20 .4 6 .7 29 .1 5 .0 25 .5 35 .0

Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,528 7,123 9,640 .76 1 .7 0 .7 2 .6 25 .4 35 .9 2 .4 37 .9 31 .5

Lander County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,775 2,575 5,490 .10 1 .1 0 .5 –0 .3 –7 .5 53 .7 –7 .4 7 .5 55 .4

Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,345 2,730 10,633 .20 0 .5 0 .3 28 .3 10 .3 1 .2 25 .3 21 .0 6 .8

Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,980 22,547 2,001 .19 26 .0 11 .3 50 .7 72 .5 47 .1 57 .9 63 .7 50 .0

Mineral County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,772 2,830 3,752 .84 1 .3 0 .8 –5 .9 –21 .7 4 .1 –1 .3 –4 .3 –0 .8

Nye County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,946 22,350 18,181 .92 2 .4 1 .2 35 .3 82 .7 96 .5 40 .3 97 .4 88 .1

Pershing County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,753 2,464 6,036 .56 1 .1 0 .4 0 .9 54 .4 27 .2 3 .1 25 .2 34 .9

Storey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,010 1,990 262 .92 15 .3 7 .6 18 .0 34 .6 68 .1 24 .7 47 .1 49 .4

Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421,407 184,841 6,302 .37 66 .9 29 .3 24 .1 33 .3 31 .5 28 .4 28 .3 30 .4

White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,030 4,498 8,875 .65 1 .1 0 .5 9 .2 –0 .9 13 .4 1 .3 11 .5 8 .7

Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,274 23,534 144 .66 382 .1 162 .7 5 .4 29 .7 26 .3 10 .6 28 .0 24 .4
8 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 6. 

Rank of Counties by Percent Change in 

Population: 2000 to 2010 

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .”

information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

 For 

County/County Equivalent Population Percent change

2010 2000 Rank Percent

Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,980 34,501 1 50 .7

Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,951,269 1,375,765 2 41 .8

Nye County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,946 32,485 3 35 .3

Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,345 4,165 4 28 .3

Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421,407 339,486 5 24 .1

Eureka County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,987 1,651 6 20 .4

Storey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,010 3,399 7 18 .0

Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,997 41,259 8 13 .9

White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,030 9,181 9 9 .2

Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,818 45,291 10 7 .8

Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,274 52,457 11 5 .4

Churchill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,877 23,982 12 3 .7

Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,528 16,106 13 2 .6

Pershing County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,753 6,693 14 0 .9

Lander County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,775 5,794 15 –0 .3

Mineral County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,772 5,071 16 –5 .9

Esmeralda County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 971 17 –19 .4
Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 9

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 7. 

Population by Urban and Rural: 2010

[For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent Total 

population

Urban Rural Percent of total 

population

Total

In urbanized 

area

In urban 

cluster Total In place Not in place Urban Rural

 Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700,551 2,543,797 2,336,222 207,575 156,754 93,034 63,720 94 .2 5 .8

Churchill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,877 16,241 – 16,241 8,636 725 7,911 65 .3 34 .7

Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,951,269 1,925,784 1,886,011 39,773 25,485 16,637 8,848 98 .7 1 .3

Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,997 32,168 4,726 27,442 14,829 12,149 2,680 68 .4 31 .6

Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,818 30,340 – 30,340 18,478 12,841 5,637 62 .1 37 .9

Esmeralda County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 – – – 783 634 149 – 100 .0

Eureka County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,987 – – – 1,987 1,002 985 – 100 .0

Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,528 10,268 – 10,268 6,260 1,302 4,958 62 .1 37 .9

Lander County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,775 3,520 – 3,520 2,255 420 1,835 61 .0 39 .0

Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,345 – – – 5,345 4,726 619 – 100 .0

Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,980 32,780 754 32,026 19,200 12,273 6,927 63 .1 36 .9

Mineral County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,772 3,249 – 3,249 1,523 1,108 415 68 .1 31 .9

Nye County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,946 28,446 – 28,446 15,500 11,752 3,748 64 .7 35 .3

Pershing County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,753 – – – 6,753 3,345 3,408 – 100 .0

Storey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,010 295 – 295 3,715 855 2,860 7 .4 92 .6

Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421,407 403,426 392,132 11,294 17,981 8,477 9,504 95 .7 4 .3

White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,030 4,681 – 4,681 5,349 2,113 3,236 46 .7 53 .3

Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,274 52,599 52,599 – 2,675 2,675 – 95 .2 4 .8
10 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700,551 1,998,257 1,201,675 1,173,814 827,457 518,777 110,571 .82 109,781 .18 24 .6 10 .7

Churchill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,877 23,982 17,938 10,826 9,732 7,290 5,024 .06 4,930 .46 5 .0 2 .2

 Carson Sink CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 35 11 13 14 6 1,196 .23 1,175 .69 – –

 Dixie Valley CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 135 167 94 114 196 2,849 .30 2,800 .93 0 .1 –

 Fallon CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,678 23,812 17,760 10,719 9,604 7,088 978 .52 953 .83 25 .9 11 .2

 Fallon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,606 7,536 6,430 3,979 3,336 2,760 3 .65 3 .63 2,370 .8 1,096 .1

 Fallon Station CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 1,265 1,092 229 360 300 2 .47 2 .47 285 .4 92 .7

Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,951,269 1,375,765 741,368 840,343 559,799 317,134 8,060 .81 7,891 .43 247 .3 106 .5

 Clark CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 179,324 49,281 25,872 82,530 22,241 10,960 7,584 .25 7,414 .99 24 .2 11 .1

 Blue Diamond CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 290 282 (X) 135 125 (X) 7 .22 7 .22 40 .2 18 .7

 Boulder City city (part) . . . . . . . . . 2 – – 2 – – 169 .94 169 .94 – –

 Bunkerville CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,303 1,014 (X) 381 277 (X) 43 .27 42 .78 30 .5 8 .9

 Cal-Nev-Ari CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 278 (X) 168 199 (X) 2 .27 2 .27 107 .5 74 .0

 Enterprise CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 44,120 1,000 827 18,204 387 334 18 .35 18 .35 2,404 .4 992 .0

 Goodsprings CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 232 (X) 124 122 (X) 1 .43 1 .43 160 .1 86 .7

 Henderson city (part) . . . . . . . . . . 32,688 2,583 – 16,755 1,290 – 27 .69 27 .69 1,180 .5 605 .1

 Indian Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 991 1,302 1,164 548 657 510 18 .01 18 .01 55 .0 30 .4

 Las Vegas city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 12,202 – – 4,957 – – 29 .18 29 .18 418 .2 169 .9

 Laughlin CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,323 7,076 4,791 4,966 4,127 2,637 89 .39 88 .04 83 .2 56 .4

 Mesquite city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,276 9,389 1,871 8,911 4,442 684 32 .35 31 .89 479 .0 279 .4

 Moapa Town CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,025 928 (X) 379 310 (X) 150 .82 150 .82 6 .8 2 .5

 Moapa Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,924 5,784 3,444 2,793 2,213 1,415 43 .70 43 .67 158 .6 64 .0

 Mount Charleston CDP . . . . . . . . 357 285 (X) 504 362 (X) 29 .29 29 .29 12 .2 17 .2

 Nelson CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 (X) (X) 43 (X) (X) 4 .80 4 .80 7 .7 9 .0

 North Las Vegas city (part) . . . . . . 128 – – – – – 40 .46 40 .46 3 .2 –

 Sandy Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,051 1,804 (X) 1,024 811 (X) 56 .00 56 .00 36 .6 18 .3

 Searchlight CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 539 576 (X) 461 444 (X) 13 .13 13 .13 41 .1 35 .1

 Summerlin South CDP (part) . . . . 16,800 505 (X) 8,090 283 (X) 8 .59 8 .59 1,955 .8 941 .8

 Sunrise Manor CDP (part) . . . . . . 9,468 7,952 4,451 4,092 3,138 1,599 7 .91 7 .91 1,197 .0 517 .3

 Las Vegas CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,771,945 1,326,484 715,587 757,813 537,558 306,228 476 .57 476 .44 3,719 .1 1,590 .6

 Boulder City city (part) . . . . . . . . . 15,021 14,966 12,567 7,410 6,979 5,390 38 .61 38 .58 389 .3 192 .1

 Enterprise CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 64,361 13,676 5,585 31,359 6,222 2,172 28 .16 28 .16 2,285 .5 1,113 .6

 Henderson city (part) . . . . . . . . . . 225,041 172,798 64,942 96,831 69,859 25,400 80 .04 80 .04 2,811 .6 1,209 .8

 Las Vegas city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 571,554 r 479,137 258,295 238,744 190,724 109,670 106 .69 106 .64 5,359 .7 2,238 .8

 Nellis AFB CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,187 8,896 8,377 1,068 3,040 2,065 2 .71 2 .71 1,176 .0 394 .1

 North Las Vegas city (part) . . . . . . 216,833 115,488 47,707 76,073 36,600 15,837 60 .93 60 .89 3,561 .1 1,249 .4

 Paradise CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223,167 186,070 124,682 114,296 85,398 63,924 46 .72 46 .72 4,776 .7 2,446 .4

 Spring Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 178,395 117,390 51,726 83,678 52,870 22,236 33 .23 33 .23 5,368 .5 2,518 .1

 Summerlin South CDP (part) . . . . 7,285 3,230 (X) 3,452 1,472 (X) 1 .06 1 .06 6,872 .6 3,256 .6

 Sunrise Manor CDP (part) . . . . . . 179,904 148,168 90,911 66,163 55,272 35,665 25 .44 25 .44 7,071 .7 2,600 .7

 Whitney CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,585 18,273 (X) 16,420 7,849 (X) 6 .74 6 .74 5,724 .8 2,436 .2

 Winchester CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,978 26,958 23,365 14,969 13,535 12,485 4 .34 4 .34 6,446 .5 3,449 .1

Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46,997 41,259 27,637 23,671 19,006 14,121 737 .64 709 .72 66 .2 33 .4

 Gardnerville-Minden CCD . . . . . . . . 30,220 24,974 15,639 13,203 9,887 6,322 171 .52 170 .74 177 .0 77 .3

 Carter Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 553 (X) (X) 241 (X) (X) 2 .80 2 .80 197 .5 86 .1

 East Valley CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 955 (X) (X) 444 (X) (X) 5 .79 5 .67 168 .4 78 .3

 Fish Springs CDP (part) . . . . . . . . 231 (X) (X) 101 (X) (X) 1 .13 1 .13 204 .4 89 .4

 Gardnerville CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,656 3,357 2,177 2,687 1,556 1,051 4 .80 4 .80 1,178 .3 559 .8

 Gardnerville Ranchos CDP . . . . . 11,312 11,054 7,455 4,745 4,123 2,810 15 .02 15 .02 753 .1 315 .9

 Johnson Lane CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 6,490 4,837 2,551 2,643 1,829 943 21 .88 21 .87 296 .8 120 .9

 Minden CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,001 2,836 1,441 1,479 1,231 688 4 .25 4 .23 709 .5 349 .6

 Ruhenstroth CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,293 (X) (X) 556 (X) (X) 2 .81 2 .81 460 .1 197 .9

 Genoa-Jacks Valley CCD . . . . . . . . . 8,232 6,631 4,158 3,927 2,752 1,671 66 .71 66 .65 123 .5 58 .9

 Genoa CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 (X) (X) 581 (X) (X) 9 .19 9 .19 102 .2 63 .2

 Indian Hills CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,627 4,407 2,544 2,394 1,737 963 14 .61 14 .61 385 .1 163 .9

 Pine Nut CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 958 787 296 413 313 122 226 .81 226 .80 4 .2 1 .8

 East Valley CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 519 (X) (X) 222 (X) (X) 3 .74 3 .74 138 .8 59 .4

 Fish Springs CDP (part) . . . . . . . . 417 (X) (X) 174 (X) (X) 8 .06 8 .06 51 .7 21 .6

 Topaz Lake CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,185 2,128 1,429 1,276 1,092 796 179 .83 178 .25 12 .3 7 .2

 Double Spring CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 158 (X) (X) 71 (X) (X) 8 .77 8 .77 18 .0 8 .1

 Topaz Lake CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 (X) (X) 142 (X) (X) 1 .69 1 .19 131 .9 119 .3

 Topaz Ranch Estates CDP . . . . . . 1,501 (X) (X) 829 (X) (X) 14 .39 14 .39 104 .3 57 .6

 Zephyr Cove CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,402 6,739 6,115 4,852 4,962 5,210 92 .76 67 .28 80 .3 72 .1

 Glenbrook CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 (X) (X) 373 (X) (X) 4 .01 3 .79 56 .7 98 .4

 Kingsbury CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,152 2,624 2,238 1,868 1,925 2,154 21 .81 21 .81 98 .7 85 .6

 Lakeridge CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 (X) (X) 355 (X) (X) 1 .53 1 .46 254 .1 243 .2

 Logan Creek CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 (X) (X) 31 (X) (X) 1 .81 1 .75 14 .9 17 .7

 Round Hill Village CDP . . . . . . . . . 759 (X) (X) 773 (X) (X) 5 .92 5 .79 131 .1 133 .5

 Skyland CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376 (X) (X) 265 (X) (X) 4 .46 4 .36 86 .2 60 .8

 Stateline CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 1,215 1,379 463 562 637 0 .82 0 .72 1,169 .4 643 .1

 Zephyr Cove CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 565 (X) (X) 663 (X) (X) 2 .24 2 .12 266 .5 312 .7
Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 11

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 Nevada—Con .

Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48,818 45,291 33,463 19,566 18,456 13,434 17,202 .95 17,169 .83 2 .8 1 .1

 Carlin CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,396 2,347 2,300 1,057 1,040 936 443 .47 443 .37 5 .4 2 .4

 Carlin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,368 2,161 2,220 1,043 1,014 888 10 .44 10 .44 226 .8 99 .9

 Elko CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,944 32,823 24,246 14,149 12,934 9,115 2,865 .64 2,863 .13 12 .9 4 .9

 Elko city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,297 16,708 14,836 7,221 6,948 5,887 17 .64 17 .64 1,037 .2 409 .4

 Lamoille CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 (X) (X) 75 (X) (X) 1 .84 1 .84 57 .1 40 .8

 Osino CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 709 (X) (X) 239 (X) (X) 2 .48 2 .48 285 .9 96 .4

 Spring Creek CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,361 10,548 5,866 4,394 3,660 1,914 58 .84 58 .77 210 .3 74 .8

 Jackpot CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,285 1,214 1,159 701 532 580 1,405 .30 1,404 .97 0 .9 0 .5

 Jackpot CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,195 (X) (X) 622 (X) (X) 3 .93 3 .88 308 .0 160 .3

 Jarbidge CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 112 113 157 191 143 1,816 .16 1,815 .34 0 .1 0 .1

 Montello CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 487 213 271 347 166 1,682 .41 1,681 .14 0 .2 0 .2

 Montello CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 (X) (X) 89 (X) (X) 0 .40 0 .40 210 .0 222 .5

 Oasis CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) 0 .89 0 .89 32 .6 22 .5

 Mountain City CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,245 1,442 1,333 683 717 691 3,863 .96 3,851 .08 0 .3 0 .2

 Owyhee CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 1,017 908 393 371 353 225 .91 225 .30 4 .2 1 .7

 Wells CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,059 2,117 1,992 1,029 1,046 932 3,455 .37 3,442 .40 0 .6 0 .3

 Wells city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,292 1,346 1,256 641 633 562 6 .90 6 .90 187 .2 92 .9

 West Wendover CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,433 4,749 2,174 1,519 1,649 898 1,670 .64 1,668 .39 2 .7 0 .9

 West Wendover city . . . . . . . . . . . 4,410 4,721 (X) 1,504 1,626 (X) 7 .48 7 .48 589 .6 201 .1

Esmeralda County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 971 1,344 850 833 966 3,589 .04 3,581 .88 0 .2 0 .2

 Goldfield CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 307 440 659 458 434 572 1,524 .24 1,524 .18 0 .2 0 .3

 Goldfield CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 (X) (X) 321 (X) (X) 1 .48 1 .48 181 .1 216 .9

 Silver Peak CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476 531 685 392 399 394 2,064 .80 2,057 .70 0 .2 0 .2

 Dyer CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 (X) (X) 183 (X) (X) 32 .58 32 .49 8 .0 5 .6

 Silver Peak CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 (X) (X) 133 (X) (X) 0 .99 0 .99 108 .1 134 .3

Eureka County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,987 1,651 1,547 1,076 1,025 817 4,179 .96 4,175 .68 0 .5 0 .3

 Beowawe CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 636 548 440 377 404 275 1,860 .30 1,857 .72 0 .3 0 .2

 Crescent Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . 392 (X) (X) 237 (X) (X) 2 .23 2 .23 175 .8 106 .3

 Eureka CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,351 1,103 1,107 699 621 542 2,319 .66 2,317 .97 0 .6 0 .3

 Eureka CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610 (X) (X) 346 (X) (X) 1 .40 1 .40 435 .7 247 .1

Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,528 16,106 12,844 7,123 6,954 5,044 9,657 .82 9,640 .76 1 .7 0 .7

 Golconda CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,579 9,952 429 750 4,269 227 1,671 .21 1,664 .28 0 .9 0 .5

 Golconda CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 (X) (X) 129 (X) (X) 9 .04 9 .04 23 .7 14 .3

 Valmy CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 (X) (X) 35 (X) (X) 3 .66 3 .66 10 .1 9 .6

 McDermitt CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,099 1,240 1,192 609 604 534 2,192 .13 2,188 .17 0 .5 0 .3

 Fort McDermitt CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 341 269 373 125 107 133 17 .93 17 .93 19 .0 7 .0

 McDermitt CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 (X) (X) 101 (X) (X) 3 .28 3 .28 52 .4 30 .8

 Orovada CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 (X) (X) 96 (X) (X) 45 .30 45 .30 3 .4 2 .1

 Paradise Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . 109 (X) (X) 92 (X) (X) 15 .95 15 .94 6 .8 5 .8

 Summit Lake CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 318 292 281 232 193 178 3,516 .13 3,510 .07 0 .1 0 .1

 Denio CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 (X) (X) 44 (X) (X) 16 .12 16 .12 2 .9 2 .7

 Winnemucca CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,532 4,622 10,942 5,532 1,888 4,105 2,278 .35 2,278 .24 5 .9 2 .4

 Winnemucca city . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,396 1,266 6,102 3,214 646 2,429 9 .39 9 .39 787 .6 342 .3

Lander County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,775 5,794 6,266 2,575 2,780 2,586 5,519 .49 5,490 .10 1 .1 0 .5

 Austin CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 528 468 990 423 372 537 3,782 .83 3,753 .51 0 .1 0 .1

 Austin CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 (X) (X) 162 (X) (X) 1 .12 1 .12 171 .4 144 .6

 Kingston CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 (X) (X) 124 (X) (X) 4 .07 4 .07 27 .8 30 .5

 Battle Mountain CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,247 5,326 5,276 2,152 2,408 2,049 1,736 .66 1,736 .59 3 .0 1 .2

 Battle Mountain CDP . . . . . . . . . . 3,635 2,871 3,542 1,518 1,455 1,431 3 .57 3 .57 1,018 .2 425 .2

Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,345 4,165 3,775 2,730 2,178 1,800 10,636 .99 10,633 .20 0 .5 0 .3

 Alamo CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,398 1,096 1,023 634 542 440 4,369 .22 4,366 .66 0 .3 0 .1

 Alamo CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,080 (X) (X) 457 (X) (X) 30 .28 30 .28 35 .7 15 .1

 Hiko CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 (X) (X) 50 (X) (X) 23 .74 23 .41 5 .1 2 .1

 Rachel CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 (X) (X) 45 (X) (X) 7 .63 7 .63 7 .1 5 .9

 Caliente CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,263 1,204 1,148 585 546 490 2,591 .60 2,591 .05 0 .5 0 .2

 Caliente city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,130 1,123 1,111 530 479 449 1 .86 1 .86 607 .5 284 .9

 Pioche CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,684 1,865 1,604 1,511 1,090 870 3,676 .17 3,675 .49 0 .7 0 .4

 Beaverdam CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 (X) (X) 26 (X) (X) 3 .85 3 .85 11 .4 6 .8

 Bennett Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . 132 (X) (X) 69 (X) (X) 11 .86 11 .86 11 .1 5 .8

 Caliente city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – –

 Dry Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 (X) (X) 33 (X) (X) 3 .79 3 .79 20 .6 8 .7

 Mount Wilson CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 (X) (X) 75 (X) (X) 4 .61 4 .61 7 .2 16 .3

 Panaca CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 (X) (X) 426 (X) (X) 3 .26 3 .26 295 .4 130 .7

 Pioche CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,002 (X) (X) 564 (X) (X) 6 .15 6 .15 162 .9 91 .7

 Ursine CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 (X) (X) 87 (X) (X) 4 .34 4 .34 21 .0 20 .0
12 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 Nevada—Con .

Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,980 34,501 20,001 22,547 14,279 8,722 2,024 .20 2,001 .19 26 .0 11 .3

 Dayton CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,276 9,682 4,321 6,412 3,794 1,804 213 .54 213 .42 71 .6 30 .0

 Dayton CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,964 5,907 2,217 3,766 2,322 920 31 .82 31 .81 281 .8 118 .4

 Fernley CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,519 8,596 5,188 8,033 3,452 2,049 184 .61 177 .75 109 .8 45 .2

 Fernley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,368 8,543 5,164 7,975 3,432 2,030 128 .86 122 .12 158 .6 65 .3

 Silver Springs CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,629 6,691 3,261 3,508 2,776 1,482 510 .96 499 .42 15 .3 7 .0

 Silver Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,296 4,708 2,253 2,456 1,935 1,081 77 .11 71 .60 74 .0 34 .3

 Stagecoach CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,874 (X) (X) 840 (X) (X) 8 .35 8 .35 224 .4 100 .6

 Smith Valley CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,670 1,564 1,139 840 697 503 572 .74 569 .21 2 .9 1 .5

 Smith Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,603 1,425 1,033 800 609 438 122 .55 120 .62 13 .3 6 .6

 Yerington CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,886 7,968 6,092 3,754 3,560 2,884 542 .36 541 .38 14 .6 6 .9

 Yerington city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,048 2,883 2,367 1,507 1,359 1,123 8 .60 8 .60 354 .4 175 .2

Mineral County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,772 5,071 6,475 2,830 2,866 2,994 3,812 .98 3,752 .84 1 .3 0 .8

 Hawthorne CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,789 3,928 5,169 2,225 2,239 2,364 993 .05 941 .01 4 .0 2 .4

 Hawthorne CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,269 3,311 4,162 1,864 1,883 1,858 1 .62 1 .62 2,017 .9 1,150 .6

 Walker Lake CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 (X) (X) 226 (X) (X) 1 .36 1 .36 202 .2 166 .2

 Mina CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 233 284 484 240 279 331 1,650 .29 1,648 .95 0 .1 0 .1

 Mina CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 (X) (X) 158 (X) (X) 2 .41 2 .41 64 .3 65 .6

 Walker River CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 750 859 822 365 348 299 1,169 .63 1,162 .88 0 .6 0 .3

 Schurz CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 658 721 617 322 312 249 58 .54 57 .74 11 .4 5 .6

Nye County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,946 32,485 17,781 22,350 15,934 8,073 18,198 .61 18,181 .92 2 .4 1 .2

 Amargosa Valley CCD . . . . . . . . . . . 1,456 1,176 786 711 541 334 527 .63 527 .57 2 .8 1 .3

 Beatty CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,032 1,173 1,652 714 752 902 1,077 .14 1,074 .92 1 .0 0 .7

 Beatty CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,010 1,154 1,623 700 740 869 174 .14 174 .11 5 .8 4 .0

 Duckwater CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 250 298 163 154 215 4,348 .61 4,346 .18 0 .1 –

 Gabbs CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 525 503 812 298 281 359 1,780 .31 1,779 .47 0 .3 0 .2

 Gabbs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 318 667 183 183 290 2 .25 2 .25 119 .6 81 .3

 Pahrump CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,583 17,601 7,425 17,918 8,351 3,508 716 .91 716 .74 51 .0 25 .0

 Pahrump CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,441 17,601 7,409 17,824 8,351 3,501 301 .88 301 .73 120 .8 59 .1

 Ralston Valley CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 39 122 40 24 62 2,880 .70 2,879 .01 – –

 Round Mountain CCD . . . . . . . . . . . 1,577 1,825 1,923 910 872 891 2,560 .13 2,557 .28 0 .6 0 .4

 Tonopah CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,497 2,783 3,680 1,596 1,589 1,753 120 .67 120 .67 20 .7 13 .2

 Tonopah CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,478 2,627 3,616 1,576 1,561 1,713 16 .24 16 .24 152 .6 97 .0

 Yucca Flat CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – 1,016 – – – 4,186 .51 4,180 .10 – –

Pershing County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,753 6,693 4,336 2,464 2,389 1,908 6,067 .43 6,036 .56 1 .1 0 .4

 Imlay CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,914 1,912 1,104 926 885 546 4,242 .60 4,217 .93 0 .5 0 .2

 Grass Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,161 (X) (X) 466 (X) (X) 34 .51 34 .51 33 .6 13 .5

 Humboldt River Ranch CDP . . . . . 119 (X) (X) 70 (X) (X) 12 .87 12 .87 9 .2 5 .4

 Imlay CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 (X) (X) 113 (X) (X) 1 .18 1 .18 144 .9 95 .8

 Lovelock CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,839 4,781 3,232 1,538 1,504 1,362 1,824 .82 1,818 .63 2 .7 0 .8

 Lovelock city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,894 2,003 2,069 945 951 892 0 .85 0 .85 2,228 .2 1,111 .8

Storey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,010 3,399 2,526 1,990 1,596 1,085 263 .64 262 .92 15 .3 7 .6

 Clark CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,123 882 700 558 461 292 133 .68 133 .23 8 .4 4 .2

 Virginia City CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,887 2,517 1,826 1,432 1,135 793 129 .97 129 .69 22 .3 11 .0

 Virginia City CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 (X) (X) 488 (X) (X) 0 .87 0 .87 982 .8 560 .9

Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 421,407 339,486 254,667 184,841 143,908 112,193 6,542 .21 6,302 .37 66 .9 29 .3

 High Desert CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 567 912 (X) 418 487 (X) 4,405 .78 4,389 .64 0 .1 0 .1

 Empire CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217 (X) (X) 126 (X) (X) 5 .13 5 .13 42 .3 24 .6

 Gerlach CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 (X) (X) 151 (X) (X) 3 .13 3 .13 65 .8 48 .2

 Incline Village CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,087 9,952 7,567 7,954 7,664 6,774 46 .96 25 .43 357 .3 312 .8

 Crystal Bay CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 (X) (X) 285 (X) (X) 0 .78 0 .45 677 .8 633 .3

 Incline Village CDP (part) . . . . . . . 8,777 (X) (X) 7,667 (X) (X) 18 .43 18 .22 481 .7 420 .8

 North Valleys CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51,813 34,002 (X) 19,127 12,155 (X) 266 .72 262 .78 197 .2 72 .8

 Cold Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,544 3,834 (X) 3,210 1,382 (X) 8 .75 8 .75 976 .5 366 .9

 Golden Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,556 (X) (X) 619 (X) (X) 3 .61 3 .61 431 .0 171 .5

 Lemmon Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . 5,040 (X) (X) 1,897 (X) (X) 18 .40 17 .19 293 .2 110 .4

 Reno city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,710 18,379 (X) 11,299 6,365 (X) 38 .00 35 .49 893 .5 318 .4

 Pyramid Lake CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,654 1,714 1,438 694 668 620 901 .91 713 .81 2 .3 1 .0

 Nixon CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 418 (X) 142 144 (X) 6 .32 6 .32 59 .2 22 .5

 Sutcliffe CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 281 (X) 120 113 (X) 10 .00 10 .00 25 .3 12 .0

 Wadsworth CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 881 640 350 360 292 3 .72 3 .72 224 .2 94 .1

 Reno North CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,633 71,163 (X) 38,187 30,938 (X) 21 .75 21 .66 3,768 .8 1,763 .0

 Mogul CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 (X) (X) 40 (X) (X) 0 .40 0 .40 290 .0 100 .0

 Reno city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79,336 67,667 (X) 37,329 29,621 (X) 18 .49 18 .40 4,311 .7 2,028 .8

 Sparks city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,099 2,153 (X) 785 828 (X) 0 .29 0 .29 7,237 .9 2,706 .9
Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 13

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 Nevada—Con .

Washoe County—Con .

 Reno Southeast CCD . . . . . . . . . . . 69,660 54,622 (X) 31,368 24,178 (X) 46 .89 46 .76 1,489 .7 670 .8

 Reno city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64,473 49,489 (X) 29,159 22,146 (X) 22 .88 22 .76 2,832 .7 1,281 .2

 Reno Southwest CCD . . . . . . . . . . . 57,544 53,634 (X) 27,610 24,483 (X) 145 .26 145 .13 396 .5 190 .2

 Incline Village CDP (part) . . . . . . . – (X) (X) – (X) (X) 3 .30 3 .30 – –

 Reno city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43,089 43,073 (X) 21,800 20,427 (X) 15 .10 15 .00 2,872 .6 1,453 .3

 Sparks CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57,101 55,794 (X) 23,697 21,901 (X) 16 .26 16 .25 3,513 .9 1,458 .3

 Reno city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – (X) (X) – (X) (X) – – – –

 Sparks city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56,480 55,186 (X) 23,432 21,668 (X) 15 .08 15 .08 3,745 .4 1,553 .8

 Sun Valley CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,337 21,002 (X) 7,182 7,464 (X) 15 .13 15 .13 1,344 .2 474 .7

 Reno city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,330 1,631 (X) 991 802 (X) 1 .02 1 .02 2,284 .3 971 .6

 Sparks city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 42 (X) 5 10 (X) 0 .30 0 .30 60 .0 16 .7

 Sun Valley CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 17,989 19,329 (X) 6,186 6,652 (X) 13 .79 13 .79 1,304 .5 448 .6

 Verdi CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,892 3,193 (X) 3,182 1,306 (X) 27 .06 26 .82 257 .0 118 .6

 Mogul CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,174 (X) (X) 483 (X) (X) 1 .08 1 .07 1,097 .2 451 .4

 Reno city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,283 241 (X) 2,004 92 (X) 10 .21 10 .17 421 .1 197 .1

 Verdi CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,415 (X) (X) 686 (X) (X) 3 .49 3 .37 419 .9 203 .6

 Warm Springs-Truckee 

 Canyon CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,378 22,054 (X) 19,983 8,151 (X) 515 .44 514 .85 101 .7 38 .8

 Spanish Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . 15,064 9,018 (X) 5,619 3,078 (X) 55 .99 55 .66 270 .6 101 .0

 Sparks city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31,667 8,965 (X) 12,233 3,519 (X) 20 .25 20 .08 1,577 .0 609 .2

 Sun Valley CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 1,310 132 (X) 462 51 (X) 1 .11 1 .11 1,180 .2 416 .2

 Washoe Valley CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,741 11,444 (X) 5,439 4,513 (X) 133 .06 124 .10 102 .7 43 .8

 Reno city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – (X) (X) – (X) (X) 0 .18 0 .18 – –

 Washoe Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 3,019 (X) (X) 1,311 (X) (X) 5 .04 5 .04 599 .0 260 .1

White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,030 9,181 9,264 4,498 4,439 3,982 8,896 .76 8,875 .65 1 .1 0 .5

 Baker CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 363 382 337 222 237 265 3,319 .36 3,305 .26 0 .1 0 .1

 Baker CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 (X) (X) 38 (X) (X) 0 .91 0 .90 75 .6 42 .2

 Cherry Creek CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 93 153 101 136 144 2,440 .44 2,434 .12 – –

 Ely CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,941 5,535 5,846 2,909 2,847 2,437 539 .94 539 .73 11 .0 5 .4

 Ely city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,255 4,041 4,756 2,185 2,205 2,098 7 .64 7 .64 556 .9 286 .0

 Lund CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 538 372 476 230 202 207 1,625 .88 1,625 .80 0 .3 0 .1

 Lund CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282 (X) (X) 115 (X) (X) 1 .70 1 .70 165 .9 67 .6

 Preston CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 (X) (X) 39 (X) (X) 1 .18 1 .18 66 .1 33 .1

 McGill CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,447 2,293 1,900 742 727 689 721 .31 720 .89 2 .0 1 .0

 McGill CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,148 1,054 1,258 582 599 576 1 .09 1 .09 1,053 .2 533 .9

 Ruth CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,669 506 552 294 290 240 249 .83 249 .83 6 .7 1 .2

 Ruth CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440 (X) (X) 247 (X) (X) 0 .35 0 .35 1,257 .1 705 .7

Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,274 52,457 40,443 23,534 21,283 16,628 157 .24 144 .66 382 .1 162 .7

 Carson City CCD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,274 52,457 40,443 23,534 21,283 16,628 157 .24 144 .66 382 .1 162 .7

 Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,274 52,457 40,443 23,534 21,283 16,628 157 .24 144 .66 382 .1 162 .7
14 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Population Housing units

State Percent Percent 

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision change change 

2000 to 2000 to 

2010 2000 1990 2010 2010 2000 1990 2010

 Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700,551 1,998,257 1,201,675 35 .1 1,173,814 827,457 518,777 41 .9

Alamo CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,080 (X) (X) (X) 457 (X) (X) (X)

Austin CDP, Lander County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 (X) (X) (X) 162 (X) (X) (X)

Baker CDP, White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 (X) (X) (X) 38 (X) (X) (X)

Battle Mountain CDP, Lander County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,635 2,871 3,542 26 .6 1,518 1,455 1,431 4 .3

Beatty CDP, Nye County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,010 1,154 1,623 –12 .5 700 740 869 –5 .4

Beaverdam CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 (X) (X) (X) 26 (X) (X) (X)

Bennett Springs CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 (X) (X) (X) 69 (X) (X) (X)

Blue Diamond CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 290 282 (X) 2 .8 135 125 (X) 8 .0

Boulder City city, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,023 14,966 12,567 0 .4 7,412 6,979 5,390 6 .2

Bunkerville CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,303 1,014 (X) 28 .5 381 277 (X) 37 .5

Caliente city, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,130 1,123 1,111 0 .6 530 479 449 10 .6

Cal-Nev-Ari CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 278 (X) –12 .2 168 199 (X) –15 .6

Carlin city, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,368 2,161 2,220 9 .6 1,043 1,014 888 2 .9

Carson City, Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,274 52,457 40,443 5 .4 23,534 21,283 16,628 10 .6

Carter Springs CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 553 (X) (X) (X) 241 (X) (X) (X)

Cold Springs CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,544 3,834 (X) 122 .8 3,210 1,382 (X) 132 .3

Crescent Valley CDP, Eureka County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392 (X) (X) (X) 237 (X) (X) (X)

Crystal Bay CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 (X) (X) (X) 285 (X) (X) (X)

Dayton CDP, Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,964 5,907 2,217 51 .8 3,766 2,322 920 62 .2

Denio CDP, Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 (X) (X) (X) 44 (X) (X) (X)

Double Spring CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 (X) (X) (X) 71 (X) (X) (X)

Dry Valley CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 (X) (X) (X) 33 (X) (X) (X)

Dyer CDP, Esmeralda County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 (X) (X) (X) 183 (X) (X) (X)

East Valley CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,474 (X) (X) (X) 666 (X) (X) (X)

Elko city, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,297 16,708 14,836 9 .5 7,221 6,948 5,887 3 .9

Ely city, White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,255 4,041 4,756 5 .3 2,185 2,205 2,098 –0 .9

Empire CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217 (X) (X) (X) 126 (X) (X) (X)

Enterprise CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108,481 14,676 6,412 639 .2 49,563 6,609 2,506 649 .9

Eureka CDP, Eureka County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 610 (X) (X) (X) 346 (X) (X) (X)

Fallon city, Churchill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,606 7,536 6,430 14 .2 3,979 3,336 2,760 19 .3

Fallon Station CDP, Churchill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 1,265 1,092 –44 .3 229 360 300 –36 .4

Fernley city, Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,368 8,543 5,164 126 .7 7,975 3,432 2,030 132 .4

Fish Springs CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 648 (X) (X) (X) 275 (X) (X) (X)

Fort McDermitt CDP, Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 269 373 26 .8 125 107 133 16 .8

Gabbs CDP, Nye County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269 318 667 –15 .4 183 183 290 –

Gardnerville CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,656 3,357 2,177 68 .5 2,687 1,556 1,051 72 .7

Gardnerville Ranchos CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . 11,312 11,054 7,455 2 .3 4,745 4,123 2,810 15 .1

Genoa CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 939 (X) (X) (X) 581 (X) (X) (X)

Gerlach CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 206 (X) (X) (X) 151 (X) (X) (X)

Glenbrook CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215 (X) (X) (X) 373 (X) (X) (X)

Golconda CDP, Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 (X) (X) (X) 129 (X) (X) (X)

Golden Valley CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,556 (X) (X) (X) 619 (X) (X) (X)

Goldfield CDP, Esmeralda County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 268 (X) (X) (X) 321 (X) (X) (X)

Goodsprings CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 232 (X) –1 .3 124 122 (X) 1 .6

Grass Valley CDP, Pershing County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,161 (X) (X) (X) 466 (X) (X) (X)

Hawthorne CDP, Mineral County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,269 3,311 4,162 –1 .3 1,864 1,883 1,858 –1 .0

Henderson city, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257,729 175,381 64,948 47 .0 113,586 71,149 25,404 59 .6

Hiko CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 (X) (X) (X) 50 (X) (X) (X)

Humboldt River Ranch CDP, Pershing County . . . . . . . . . 119 (X) (X) (X) 70 (X) (X) (X)

Imlay CDP, Pershing County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 (X) (X) (X) 113 (X) (X) (X)

Incline Village CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,777 (X) (X) (X) 7,667 (X) (X) (X)

Indian Hills CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,627 4,407 2,544 27 .7 2,394 1,737 963 37 .8

Indian Springs CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 991 1,302 1,164 –23 .9 548 657 510 –16 .6

Jackpot CDP, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,195 (X) (X) (X) 622 (X) (X) (X)

Johnson Lane CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,490 4,837 2,551 34 .2 2,643 1,829 943 44 .5

Kingsbury CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,152 2,624 2,238 –18 .0 1,868 1,925 2,154 –3 .0

Kingston CDP, Lander County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 113 (X) (X) (X) 124 (X) (X) (X)

Lakeridge CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 (X) (X) (X) 355 (X) (X) (X)

Lamoille CDP, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 (X) (X) (X) 75 (X) (X) (X)

Las Vegas city, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 583,756 r 479,137 258,204 21 .8 243,701 190,724 109,616 27 .8

Laughlin CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,323 7,076 4,791 3 .5 4,966 4,127 2,637 20 .3

Lemmon Valley CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,040 (X) (X) (X) 1,897 (X) (X) (X)

Logan Creek CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 (X) (X) (X) 31 (X) (X) (X)

Lovelock city, Pershing County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,894 2,003 2,069 –5 .4 945 951 892 –0 .6

Lund CDP, White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282 (X) (X) (X) 115 (X) (X) (X)

McDermitt CDP, Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 (X) (X) (X) 101 (X) (X) (X)

McGill CDP, White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,148 1,054 1,258 8 .9 582 599 576 –2 .8

Mesquite city, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,276 9,389 1,871 62 .7 8,911 4,442 684 100 .6

Mina CDP, Mineral County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 (X) (X) (X) 158 (X) (X) (X)

Minden CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,001 2,836 1,441 5 .8 1,479 1,231 688 20 .1
Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 15

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Area measurements in square miles Average per square mile of land

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Total area Land area Population density Housing unit density

110,571 .82 109,781 .18 24 .6 10 .7 Nevada

30 .28 30 .28 35 .7 15 .1 Alamo CDP, Lincoln County

1 .12 1 .12 171 .4 144 .6 Austin CDP, Lander County

0 .91 0 .90 75 .6 42 .2 Baker CDP, White Pine County

3 .57 3 .57 1,018 .2 425 .2 Battle Mountain CDP, Lander County

174 .14 174 .11 5 .8 4 .0 Beatty CDP, Nye County

3 .85 3 .85 11 .4 6 .8 Beaverdam CDP, Lincoln County

11 .86 11 .86 11 .1 5 .8 Bennett Springs CDP, Lincoln County

7 .22 7 .22 40 .2 18 .7 Blue Diamond CDP, Clark County

208 .56 208 .52 72 .0 35 .5 Boulder City city, Clark County

43 .27 42 .78 30 .5 8 .9 Bunkerville CDP, Clark County

1 .87 1 .87 604 .3 283 .4 Caliente city, Lincoln County

2 .27 2 .27 107 .5 74 .0 Cal-Nev-Ari CDP, Clark County

10 .44 10 .44 226 .8 99 .9 Carlin city, Elko County

157 .24 144 .66 382 .1 162 .7 Carson City, Carson City

2 .80 2 .80 197 .5 86 .1 Carter Springs CDP, Douglas County

8 .75 8 .75 976 .5 366 .9 Cold Springs CDP, Washoe County

2 .23 2 .23 175 .8 106 .3 Crescent Valley CDP, Eureka County

0 .78 0 .45 677 .8 633 .3 Crystal Bay CDP, Washoe County

31 .82 31 .81 281 .8 118 .4 Dayton CDP, Lyon County

16 .12 16 .12 2 .9 2 .7 Denio CDP, Humboldt County

8 .77 8 .77 18 .0 8 .1 Double Spring CDP, Douglas County

3 .79 3 .79 20 .6 8 .7 Dry Valley CDP, Lincoln County

32 .58 32 .49 8 .0 5 .6 Dyer CDP, Esmeralda County

9 .53 9 .40 156 .8 70 .9 East Valley CDP, Douglas County

17 .64 17 .64 1,037 .2 409 .4 Elko city, Elko County

7 .64 7 .64 556 .9 286 .0 Ely city, White Pine County

5 .13 5 .13 42 .3 24 .6 Empire CDP, Washoe County

46 .51 46 .51 2,332 .4 1,065 .6 Enterprise CDP, Clark County

1 .40 1 .40 435 .7 247 .1 Eureka CDP, Eureka County

3 .65 3 .63 2,370 .8 1,096 .1 Fallon city, Churchill County

2 .47 2 .47 285 .4 92 .7 Fallon Station CDP, Churchill County

128 .86 122 .12 158 .6 65 .3 Fernley city, Lyon County

9 .19 9 .19 70 .5 29 .9 Fish Springs CDP, Douglas County

17 .93 17 .93 19 .0 7 .0 Fort McDermitt CDP, Humboldt County

2 .25 2 .25 119 .6 81 .3 Gabbs CDP, Nye County

4 .80 4 .80 1,178 .3 559 .8 Gardnerville CDP, Douglas County

15 .02 15 .02 753 .1 315 .9 Gardnerville Ranchos CDP, Douglas County

9 .19 9 .19 102 .2 63 .2 Genoa CDP, Douglas County

3 .13 3 .13 65 .8 48 .2 Gerlach CDP, Washoe County

4 .01 3 .79 56 .7 98 .4 Glenbrook CDP, Douglas County

9 .04 9 .04 23 .7 14 .3 Golconda CDP, Humboldt County

3 .61 3 .61 431 .0 171 .5 Golden Valley CDP, Washoe County

1 .48 1 .48 181 .1 216 .9 Goldfield CDP, Esmeralda County

1 .43 1 .43 160 .1 86 .7 Goodsprings CDP, Clark County

34 .51 34 .51 33 .6 13 .5 Grass Valley CDP, Pershing County

1 .62 1 .62 2,017 .9 1,150 .6 Hawthorne CDP, Mineral County

107 .73 107 .73 2,392 .4 1,054 .4 Henderson city, Clark County

23 .74 23 .41 5 .1 2 .1 Hiko CDP, Lincoln County

12 .87 12 .87 9 .2 5 .4 Humboldt River Ranch CDP, Pershing County

1 .18 1 .18 144 .9 95 .8 Imlay CDP, Pershing County

21 .74 21 .53 407 .7 356 .1 Incline Village CDP, Washoe County

14 .61 14 .61 385 .1 163 .9 Indian Hills CDP, Douglas County

18 .01 18 .01 55 .0 30 .4 Indian Springs CDP, Clark County

3 .93 3 .88 308 .0 160 .3 Jackpot CDP, Elko County

21 .88 21 .87 296 .8 120 .9 Johnson Lane CDP, Douglas County

21 .81 21 .81 98 .7 85 .6 Kingsbury CDP, Douglas County

4 .07 4 .07 27 .8 30 .5 Kingston CDP, Lander County

1 .53 1 .46 254 .1 243 .2 Lakeridge CDP, Douglas County

1 .84 1 .84 57 .1 40 .8 Lamoille CDP, Elko County

135 .87 135 .81 4,298 .3 1,794 .4 Las Vegas city, Clark County

89 .39 88 .04 83 .2 56 .4 Laughlin CDP, Clark County

18 .40 17 .19 293 .2 110 .4 Lemmon Valley CDP, Washoe County

1 .81 1 .75 14 .9 17 .7 Logan Creek CDP, Douglas County

0 .85 0 .85 2,228 .2 1,111 .8 Lovelock city, Pershing County

1 .70 1 .70 165 .9 67 .6 Lund CDP, White Pine County

3 .28 3 .28 52 .4 30 .8 McDermitt CDP, Humboldt County

1 .09 1 .09 1,053 .2 533 .9 McGill CDP, White Pine County

32 .35 31 .89 479 .0 279 .4 Mesquite city, Clark County

2 .41 2 .41 64 .3 65 .6 Mina CDP, Mineral County

4 .25 4 .23 709 .5 349 .6 Minden CDP, Douglas County
16 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010 2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010

Moapa Town CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,025 928 (X) 10 .5 379 310 (X) 22 .3

Moapa Valley CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,924 5,784 3,444 19 .7 2,793 2,213 1,415 26 .2

Mogul CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,290 (X) (X) (X) 523 (X) (X) (X)

Montello CDP, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 (X) (X) (X) 89 (X) (X) (X)

Mount Charleston CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 285 (X) 25 .3 504 362 (X) 39 .2

Mount Wilson CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 (X) (X) (X) 75 (X) (X) (X)

Nellis AFB CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,187 8,896 8,377 –64 .2 1,068 3,040 2,065 –64 .9

Nelson CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 (X) (X) (X) 43 (X) (X) (X)

Nixon CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 374 418 (X) –10 .5 142 144 (X) –1 .4

North Las Vegas city, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216,961 115,488 47,849 87 .9 76,073 36,600 15,881 107 .8

Oasis CDP, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 (X) (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) (X)

Orovada CDP, Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 (X) (X) (X) 96 (X) (X) (X)

Osino CDP, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 709 (X) (X) (X) 239 (X) (X) (X)

Owyhee CDP, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 953 1,017 908 –6 .3 393 371 353 5 .9

Pahrump CDP, Nye County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,441 24,631 7,424 47 .9 17,824 11,651 3,509 53 .0

Panaca CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 963 (X) (X) (X) 426 (X) (X) (X)

Paradise CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223,167 186,070 124,682 19 .9 114,296 85,398 63,924 33 .8

Paradise Valley CDP, Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 (X) (X) (X) 92 (X) (X) (X)

Pioche CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,002 (X) (X) (X) 564 (X) (X) (X)

Preston CDP, White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 (X) (X) (X) 39 (X) (X) (X)

Rachel CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 (X) (X) (X) 45 (X) (X) (X)

Reno city, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225,221 180,480 133,850 24 .8 102,582 79,453 61,384 29 .1

Round Hill Village CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 759 (X) (X) (X) 773 (X) (X) (X)

Ruhenstroth CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,293 (X) (X) (X) 556 (X) (X) (X)

Ruth CDP, White Pine County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 440 (X) (X) (X) 247 (X) (X) (X)

Sandy Valley CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,051 1,804 (X) 13 .7 1,024 811 (X) 26 .3

Schurz CDP, Mineral County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 658 721 617 –8 .7 322 312 249 3 .2

Searchlight CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 539 576 (X) –6 .4 461 444 (X) 3 .8

Silver Peak CDP, Esmeralda County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 (X) (X) (X) 133 (X) (X) (X)

Silver Springs CDP, Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,296 4,708 2,253 12 .5 2,456 1,935 1,061 26 .9

Skyland CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 376 (X) (X) (X) 265 (X) (X) (X)

Smith Valley CDP, Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,603 1,425 1,033 12 .5 800 609 438 31 .4

Spanish Springs CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,064 9,018 (X) 67 .0 5,619 3,078 (X) 82 .6

Sparks city, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,264 66,346 53,367 36 .1 36,455 26,025 21,660 40 .1

Spring Creek CDP, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,361 10,548 5,866 17 .2 4,394 3,660 1,914 20 .1

Spring Valley CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178,395 117,390 51,726 52 .0 83,678 52,870 22,236 58 .3

Stagecoach CDP, Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,874 (X) (X) (X) 840 (X) (X) (X)

Stateline CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842 1,215 1,379 –30 .7 463 562 637 –17 .6

Summerlin South CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,085 3,735 (X) 544 .8 11,542 1,755 (X) 557 .7

Sunrise Manor CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189,372 156,120 95,362 21 .3 70,255 58,410 37,264 20 .3

Sun Valley CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,299 19,461 11,391 –0 .8 6,648 6,703 4,257 –0 .8

Sutcliffe CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 281 (X) –10 .0 120 113 (X) 6 .2

Tonopah CDP, Nye County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,478 2,627 3,616 –5 .7 1,576 1,561 1,713 1 .0

Topaz Lake CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 (X) (X) (X) 142 (X) (X) (X)

Topaz Ranch Estates CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . 1,501 (X) (X) (X) 829 (X) (X) (X)

Ursine CDP, Lincoln County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 (X) (X) (X) 87 (X) (X) (X)

Valmy CDP, Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 (X) (X) (X) 35 (X) (X) (X)

Verdi CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,415 (X) (X) (X) 686 (X) (X) (X)

Virginia City CDP, Storey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 855 (X) (X) (X) 488 (X) (X) (X)

Wadsworth CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 834 881 640 –5 .3 350 360 292 –2 .8

Walker Lake CDP, Mineral County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 (X) (X) (X) 226 (X) (X) (X)

Washoe Valley CDP, Washoe County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,019 (X) (X) (X) 1,311 (X) (X) (X)

Wells city, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,292 1,346 1,256 –4 .0 641 633 562 1 .3

West Wendover city, Elko County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,410 4,721 (X) –6 .6 1,504 1,626 (X) –7 .5

Whitney CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,585 18,273 (X) 111 .2 16,420 7,849 (X) 109 .2

Winchester CDP, Clark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,978 26,958 23,365 3 .8 14,969 13,535 12,485 10 .6

Winnemucca city, Humboldt County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,396 7,174 6,102 3 .1 3,214 3,280 2,429 –2 .0

Yerington city, Lyon County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,048 2,883 2,367 5 .7 1,507 1,359 1,123 10 .9

Zephyr Cove CDP, Douglas County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 565 (X) (X) (X) 663 (X) (X) (X)
Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 17

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Area measurements in square miles Average per square mile of land

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Total area Land area Population density Housing unit density

150 .82 150 .82 6 .8 2 .5 Moapa Town CDP, Clark County

43 .70 43 .67 158 .6 64 .0 Moapa Valley CDP, Clark County

1 .48 1 .47 877 .6 355 .8 Mogul CDP, Washoe County

0 .40 0 .40 210 .0 222 .5 Montello CDP, Elko County

29 .29 29 .29 12 .2 17 .2 Mount Charleston CDP, Clark County

4 .61 4 .61 7 .2 16 .3 Mount Wilson CDP, Lincoln County

2 .71 2 .71 1,176 .0 394 .1 Nellis AFB CDP, Clark County

4 .80 4 .80 7 .7 9 .0 Nelson CDP, Clark County

6 .32 6 .32 59 .2 22 .5 Nixon CDP, Washoe County

101 .39 101 .35 2,140 .7 750 .6 North Las Vegas city, Clark County

0 .89 0 .89 32 .6 22 .5 Oasis CDP, Elko County

45 .30 45 .30 3 .4 2 .1 Orovada CDP, Humboldt County

2 .48 2 .48 285 .9 96 .4 Osino CDP, Elko County

225 .91 225 .30 4 .2 1 .7 Owyhee CDP, Elko County

301 .88 301 .73 120 .8 59 .1 Pahrump CDP, Nye County

3 .26 3 .26 295 .4 130 .7 Panaca CDP, Lincoln County

46 .72 46 .72 4,776 .7 2,446 .4 Paradise CDP, Clark County

15 .95 15 .94 6 .8 5 .8 Paradise Valley CDP, Humboldt County

6 .15 6 .15 162 .9 91 .7 Pioche CDP, Lincoln County

1 .18 1 .18 66 .1 33 .1 Preston CDP, White Pine County

7 .63 7 .63 7 .1 5 .9 Rachel CDP, Lincoln County

105 .88 103 .01 2,186 .4 995 .8 Reno city, Washoe County

5 .92 5 .79 131 .1 133 .5 Round Hill Village CDP, Douglas County

2 .81 2 .81 460 .1 197 .9 Ruhenstroth CDP, Douglas County

0 .35 0 .35 1,257 .1 705 .7 Ruth CDP, White Pine County

56 .00 56 .00 36 .6 18 .3 Sandy Valley CDP, Clark County

58 .54 57 .74 11 .4 5 .6 Schurz CDP, Mineral County

13 .13 13 .13 41 .1 35 .1 Searchlight CDP, Clark County

0 .99 0 .99 108 .1 134 .3 Silver Peak CDP, Esmeralda County

77 .11 71 .60 74 .0 34 .3 Silver Springs CDP, Lyon County

4 .46 4 .36 86 .2 60 .8 Skyland CDP, Douglas County

122 .55 120 .62 13 .3 6 .6 Smith Valley CDP, Lyon County

55 .99 55 .66 270 .6 101 .0 Spanish Springs CDP, Washoe County

35 .93 35 .76 2,524 .2 1,019 .4 Sparks city, Washoe County

58 .84 58 .77 210 .3 74 .8 Spring Creek CDP, Elko County

33 .23 33 .23 5,368 .5 2,518 .1 Spring Valley CDP, Clark County

8 .35 8 .35 224 .4 100 .6 Stagecoach CDP, Lyon County

0 .82 0 .72 1,169 .4 643 .1 Stateline CDP, Douglas County

9 .64 9 .64 2,498 .4 1,197 .3 Summerlin South CDP, Clark County

33 .35 33 .35 5,678 .3 2,106 .6 Sunrise Manor CDP, Clark County

14 .90 14 .90 1,295 .2 446 .2 Sun Valley CDP, Washoe County

10 .00 10 .00 25 .3 12 .0 Sutcliffe CDP, Washoe County

16 .24 16 .24 152 .6 97 .0 Tonopah CDP, Nye County

1 .69 1 .19 131 .9 119 .3 Topaz Lake CDP, Douglas County

14 .39 14 .39 104 .3 57 .6 Topaz Ranch Estates CDP, Douglas County

4 .34 4 .34 21 .0 20 .0 Ursine CDP, Lincoln County

3 .66 3 .66 10 .1 9 .6 Valmy CDP, Humboldt County

3 .49 3 .37 419 .9 203 .6 Verdi CDP, Washoe County

0 .87 0 .87 982 .8 560 .9 Virginia City CDP, Storey County

3 .72 3 .72 224 .2 94 .1 Wadsworth CDP, Washoe County

1 .36 1 .36 202 .2 166 .2 Walker Lake CDP, Mineral County

5 .04 5 .04 599 .0 260 .1 Washoe Valley CDP, Washoe County

6 .90 6 .90 187 .2 92 .9 Wells city, Elko County

7 .48 7 .48 589 .6 201 .1 West Wendover city, Elko County

6 .74 6 .74 5,724 .8 2,436 .2 Whitney CDP, Clark County

4 .34 4 .34 6,446 .5 3,449 .1 Winchester CDP, Clark County

9 .39 9 .39 787 .6 342 .3 Winnemucca city, Humboldt County

8 .60 8 .60 354 .4 175 .2 Yerington city, Lyon County

2 .24 2 .12 266 .5 312 .7 Zephyr Cove CDP, Douglas County
18 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 10. 

Rank by 2010 Population and Housing Units: 2000 and 2010 

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Population Housing units Place [2,500 or More Population]

2010 rank 2010 2000 2010 rank 2010 2000

Las Vegas city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 583,756 r 479,137 1 243,701 190,724

Henderson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 257,729 175,381 3 113,586 71,149

Reno city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 225,221 180,480 4 102,582 79,453

Paradise CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 223,167 186,070 2 114,296 85,398

North Las Vegas city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 216,961 115,488 6 76,073 36,600

Sunrise Manor CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 189,372 156,120 7 70,255 58,410

Spring Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 178,395 117,390 5 83,678 52,870

Enterprise CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 108,481 14,676 8 49,563 6,609

Sparks city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 90,264 66,346 9 36,455 26,025

Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 55,274 52,457 10 23,534 21,283

Whitney CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 38,585 18,273 12 16,420 7,849

Pahrump CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 36,441 24,631 11 17,824 11,651

Winchester CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 27,978 26,958 13 14,969 13,535

Summerlin South CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 24,085 3,735 14 11,542 1,755

Fernley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 19,368 8,543 16 7,975 3,432

Sun Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 19,299 19,461 20 6,648 6,703

Elko city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 18,297 16,708 19 7,221 6,948

Mesquite city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 15,276 9,389 15 8,911 4,442

Spanish Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 15,064 9,018 21 5,619 3,078

Boulder City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 15,023 14,966 18 7,412 6,979

Spring Creek CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 12,361 10,548 24 4,394 3,660

Gardnerville Ranchos CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 11,312 11,054 23 4,745 4,123

Dayton CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 8,964 5,907 26 3,766 2,322

Incline Village CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 8,777 (X) 17 7,667 (X)

Fallon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 8,606 7,536 25 3,979 3,336

Cold Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 8,544 3,834 28 3,210 1,382

Winnemucca city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 7,396 7,174 27 3,214 3,280

Laughlin CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 7,323 7,076 22 4,966 4,127

Moapa Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 6,924 5,784 29 2,793 2,213

Johnson Lane CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 6,490 4,837 31 2,643 1,829

Gardnerville CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 5,656 3,357 30 2,687 1,556

Indian Hills CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 5,627 4,407 33 2,394 1,737

Silver Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 5,296 4,708 32 2,456 1,935

Lemmon Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 5,040 (X) 35 1,897 (X)

West Wendover city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 4,410 4,721 39 1,504 1,626

Ely city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 4,255 4,041 34 2,185 2,205

Battle Mountain CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3,635 2,871 37 1,518 1,455

Hawthorne CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 3,269 3,311 36 1,864 1,883

Nellis AFB CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3,187 8,896 42 1,068 3,040

Yerington city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3,048 2,883 38 1,507 1,359

Washoe Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3,019 (X) 41 1,311 (X)

Minden CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3,001 2,836 40 1,479 1,231
Population and Housing Unit Counts Nevada 19

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 11. 

Rank of Places by Percent Change in 

Population: 2000 to 2010 

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .”

information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

 For 

Place [2,500 or More Population] Population Percent change

2010 2000 Rank Percent

Enterprise CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108,481 14,676 1 639 .17

Summerlin South CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,085 3,735 2 544 .85

Fernley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,368 8,543 3 126 .71

Cold Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,544 3,834 4 122 .85

Whitney CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38,585 18,273 5 111 .16

North Las Vegas city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216,961 115,488 6 87 .86

Gardnerville CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,656 3,357 7 68 .48

Spanish Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,064 9,018 8 67 .04

Mesquite city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,276 9,389 9 62 .70

Spring Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 178,395 117,390 10 51 .97

Dayton CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,964 5,907 11 51 .75

Pahrump CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,441 24,631 12 47 .95

Henderson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257,729 175,381 13 46 .95

Sparks city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90,264 66,346 14 36 .05

Johnson Lane CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,490 4,837 15 34 .17

Indian Hills CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,627 4,407 16 27 .68

Battle Mountain CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,635 2,871 17 26 .61

Reno city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225,221 180,480 18 24 .79

Las Vegas city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 583,756 r 479,137 19 21 .83

Sunrise Manor CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 189,372 156,120 20 21 .30

Paradise CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223,167 186,070 21 19 .94

Moapa Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,924 5,784 22 19 .71

Spring Creek CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,361 10,548 23 17 .19

Fallon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,606 7,536 24 14 .20

Silver Springs CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,296 4,708 25 12 .49

Elko city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,297 16,708 26 9 .51

Minden CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,001 2,836 27 5 .82

Yerington city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,048 2,883 28 5 .72

Carson City . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,274 52,457 29 5 .37

Ely city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,255 4,041 30 5 .30

Winchester CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,978 26,958 31 3 .78

Laughlin CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,323 7,076 32 3 .49

Winnemucca city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,396 7,174 33 3 .09

Gardnerville Ranchos CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,312 11,054 34 2 .33

Boulder City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,023 14,966 35 0 .38

Sun Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,299 19,461 36 –0 .83

Hawthorne CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,269 3,311 37 –1 .27

West Wendover city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,410 4,721 38 –6 .59

Nellis AFB CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,187 8,896 39 –64 .17

Incline Village CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,777 (X) (X) (X)

Lemmon Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,040 (X) (X) (X)

Washoe Valley CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,019 (X) (X) (X)
20 Nevada Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 12. 

Population and Housing Units for Urban Areas: 2010

[For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Urbanized Area

Urban Cluster

State total Total for urban areas crossing 

state lines

Population Housing units Population Housing units

 Nevada . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,700,551 1,173,814 (X) (X)

 Urban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,543,797 1,097,550 (X) (X)

In urbanized area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,336,222 999,698 (X) (X)

In urban cluster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207,575 97,852 (X) (X)

 Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156,754 76,264 (X) (X)

URBANIZED AREA

Carson City, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58,079 24,622 (X) (X)

Las Vegas--Henderson, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,886,011 806,755 (X) (X)

Reno, NV--CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 392,132 168,321 392,141 168,328

URBAN CLUSTER

Battle Mountain, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,520 1,466 (X) (X)

Boulder City, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,866 6,981 (X) (X)

Bullhead City, AZ--NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 180 146 48,656 27,288

Dayton, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,127 4,569 (X) (X)

Elko, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,948 7,420 (X) (X)

Ely, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,681 2,331 (X) (X)

Fallon, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,241 7,098 (X) (X)

Fernley, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,979 7,829 (X) (X)

Gardnerville Ranchos, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,107 8,897 (X) (X)

Hawthorne, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,249 1,863 (X) (X)

Incline Village, NV--CA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,953 7,071 13,022 11,077

Johnson Lane, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,337 2,164 (X) (X)

Laughlin, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,949 3,949 (X) (X)

Mesquite, NV--AZ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,871 7,810 14,284 8,051

Moapa Valley, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,907 2,382 (X) (X)

Pahrump, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,446 13,834 (X) (X)

South Lake Tahoe, CA--NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,998 1,281 29,107 20,291

Spring Creek North, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,286 1,205 (X) (X)

Spring Creek South, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,862 1,295 (X) (X)

Washoe Valley, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,645 1,160 (X) (X)

West Wendover, NV--UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,244 1,439 5,365 1,894

Winnemucca, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,268 4,225 (X) (X)

Yerington, NV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,911 1,437 (X) (X)
Appendixes 

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Appendixes

Several appendixes traditionally found in printed reports are now available in a separate volume. For the 

following, see CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, in print or on the 

Internet at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf> :

Appendix A. Geographic Terms and Concepts

Appendix B. Definitions of Subject Characteristics

Appendix C. Data Collection and Processing Procedures

Appendix D. Questionnaire

Appendix F. Operational Overview and Accuracy of the Data

Appendix G. Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census of the United States

Appendix H. Acknowledgments

This Appendix section contains:

 Appendix E. Maps

Maps Nevada E-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Appendix E.

Maps

CHURCHILL

CLARK

DOUGLAS

ELKO

ESMERALDA

EUREKA

HUMBOLDT

LANDER

LINCOLN

LYON

WASHOE

WHITE PINE

MINERAL

NYE

PERSHING

STOREY

Carson City

UTAH

ARIZONA

CALIFORNIA

OREGON IDAHO

113°

113°

114°

114°

115°

115°

116°

116°

117°

117°

118°

118°

119°

119°

120°

121° 120°

42° 42°

41° 41°

40° 40°

39° 39°

38° 38°

37° 37°

36° 36°

35° 35°

Counties and Independent City

0 20 40 60 Kilometers

0 20 40 60 Miles

LEGEND

IDAHO State

Note: All boundaries and names are

as of January 1, 2010.

CLARK County

Carson City Independent City
E-2 Nevada Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend, Section Locator, and Location Index

Carson

City

NYE

ELKO

CLARK

LINCOLN

HUMBOLDT

WASHOE

WHITE PINE

LANDER

PERSHING

EUREKA

CHURCHILL

MINERAL

LYON

ESMERALDA

DOUGLAS

STOREY

1

Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend

Census Designated Place

Large River, Lake, Water Body,

or Shoreline

Zena

Lake Erie

American Indian Reservation

(Federal) CAMPO

ZIA Off-Reservation Trust Land

Inset

A fishhook joins contiguous and/or discontiguous

parts of the same geographic entity.

SEE INSET A

State

Incorporated Place1 ROME

YORK County Subdivision1

ERIE County or Independent City

Note: All legal and statistical area boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. Where international, state, county, independent city, and/or county subdivision boundaries

coincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for the highest level of these geographic entities. The county and independent city boundaries are always shown. Where a county

subdivision boundary symbol coincides with a place boundary, the map does not show the place boundary symbol. Where American Indian Reservation (Federal), American Indian

Reservation (State), State Designated Tribal Statistical Area, and/or Tribal Designated Statistical Area boundaries coincide with a county subdivision boundary, the map does not

show the county subdivision boundary symbol. Any geographic entity name may include ’(pt)’ if some portion of the entity extends beyond the limits of the map area displayed on

the page, or if multiple discontiguous pieces of the entity have been discretely labeled on the page. A geographic entity name may include ’(pts)’ if many discontiguous pieces

exist for that entity that cannot be discretely labeled. The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau statistical data collection and tabulation purposes only; their

depiction and designation for statistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority or rights of ownership or entitlement.

1

 A ’*’ following a place name indicates that the place is an independent city and coextensive with a separate county subdivision. The county subdivision name is shown only if 

different than the name of the place.

Section Locator

LEGEND

ADAMS County

1 Map Section

Carson City Independent City
Maps Nevada E-3

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend, Section Locator, and Location Index

COUNTY/

INDEPENDENT CITY

Carson City 1

Churchill 1

Clark 1

Douglas 1

Elko 1

Esmeralda 1

Eureka 1

Humboldt 1

Lander 1

Lincoln 1

Lyon 1

Mineral 1

Nye 1

Pershing 1

Storey 1

Washoe 1

White Pine 1

County and Independent City Location Index

This list presents the map section numbers for each county and independent city in the state.

 Map section numbers refer to the geographic areas reference maps only.

MAP

SEC
E-4 Nevada Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

CHURCHILL

CLARK

DOUGLAS

ELKO

ESMERALDA

EUREKA

HUMBOLDT

LANDER

LINCOLN

LYON

MINERAL NYE

PERSHING

STOREY

WASHOE

WHITE

PINE

LOVE LOCK

WELLS

1

2

Ruth

SEE INSET C

SEE

INSET A 1 2

3

KEY

1 SOUTH FORK (pts)

ELKO

2 SOUTH FORK (pts)

CHURCHILL

1 FALLON PAIUTE-SHOSHONE (COLONY) (pt)

4 FALLON PAIUTE-SHOSHONE (RESERVATION)

2

3

FALLON PAIUTE-SHOSHONE (COLONY)

FALLON PAIUTE-SHOSHONE (RESERVATION)

Wadsworth

SEE

INSET B

CALIENTE

CARLIN

ELKO

ELY

FALLON

LOVELOCK

WELLS

WEST WENDOVER

WINNEMUCCA

Denio

Dry

Valley

Dyer

Empire

Eureka

Fallon

Station

Fort McDermitt

Gabbs

Gerlach

Golconda

Goldfield

Mina

Montello

Mount Wilson

Nixon

Grass

Valley

Hawthorne

Hiko

Humboldt

River

Ranch

Imlay

Jackpot

Kingston

Lamoille

Lund

McDermitt

McGill

Alamo

Austin

Baker

Battle

Mountain

Beatty

Beaverdam

Bennett

Springs

Crescent

Valley

Oasis

Orovada

Osino

Owyhee

Pahrump

Panaca

Paradise

Valley

Pioche

Preston

Rachel

Schurz

Silver

Peak

Spring

Creek

Sutcliffe

Tonopah

Ursine

Valmy

Walker Lake

FORT

McDERMITT

(pt)

GOSHUTE

(pt)

ELY

ELY

PYRAMID

LAKE

PAIUTE (pt)

WINNEMUCCA

TIMBI-SHA

SHOSHONE (pt)

SOUTH

FORK

SUMMIT

LAKE

WALKER

RIVER (pt)

YOMBA

(pts) DUCKWATER

ELKO

BATTLE

MOUNTAIN

DUCK

VALLEY (pt)

4

SOUTH

FORK (pts)

SUMMIT

LAKE

CARSON

SINK DIXIE VALLEY

FALLON

CARLIN ELKO

JACKPOT

JARBIDGE

MONTELLO

MOUNTAIN CITY

WELLS

WEST WENDOVER

GOLDFIELD

SILVER PEAK

BEOWAWE

EUREKA

GOLCONDA

McDERMITT

SUMMIT

LAKE WINNEMUCCA

AUSTIN

BATTLE

MOUNTAIN

ALAMO CALIENTE

PIOCHE HAWTHORNE

MINA

WALKER

RIVER

AMARGOSA VALLEY BEATTY

DUCKWATER

GABBS

PAHRUMP

RALSTON

VALLEY

ROUND MOUNTAIN

TONOPAH

YUCCA FLAT

IMLAY

LOVELOCK

HIGH DESERT

PYRAMID LAKE

BAKER

CHERRY CREEK

ELY

LUND

McGILL

RUTH

Lake Mead

Pyramid

Lake

Walker

Lake

Winnemucca

Lake

114°

114°

115°

115°

116°

116°

117°

117°

118°

118°

119°

119°

120°

120°

42°

42°

41°41°

40°

40°

39°

39°

38°38°

37°37°

36°

36°

35°35°

American Indian Areas, Counties,

Independent City, County Subdivisions, and Other Places - Section 1

0 25 50 75 Kilometers

0 25 50 75 Miles
Maps Nevada E-5

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

STOREY

WASHOE (pt)

RENO (pt)

RENO (pt)

RENO

(pt)

RENO (pt)

RENO (pt)

RENO (pt) RENO (pt)

SPARKS (pt) SPARKS (pt)

Crystal

Bay

Golden

Valley

Mogul

Incline Village

Lemmon

Valley

Cold

Springs

Spanish Springs

Sun

Valley

Verdi

Virginia City Washoe

Valley

PYRAMID LAKE

PAIUTE (pt)

RENOSPARKS (pt)

RENOSPARKS

(pt)

RENOSPARKS (pt)

RENOSPARKS (pt)

RENOSPARKS (pt)

CLARK

VIRGINIA CITY

INCLINE

VILLAGE

NORTH VALLEYS

RENO NORTH

RENO SOUTHEAST

RENO SOUTHWEST

SPARKS

SUN

VALLEY

VERDI

WARM SPRINGS-TRUCKEE CANYON

WASHOE VALLEY

Lake Tahoe

119°30’

119°30’

120°

120°

40°

40°

39°30’

39°30’

American Indian Areas, Counties,

Independent City, County Subdivisions, and Other Places - Inset A

0 2 4 6 Kilometers

0 2 4 6 Miles
E-6 Nevada Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

DOUGLAS

LYON

WASHOE

RANCHES

(pts)

WASHOE

RANCHES

(pts)

1

2

KEY

1 Ruhenstroth

2 Carter Springs

DOUGLAS

CARSON CITY*

FERNLEY

YERINGTON

Dayton

Double Spring

East

Valley

Fish

Springs

Gardnerville

Gardner- ville Ranchos

Genoa

Glenbrook

Minden

Indian

Hills

Johnson

Lane

Kingsbury

Lakeridge

Logan

Creek

Round Hill Village

Silver Springs

Skyland

Smith Valley

Stagecoach

Stateline

Topaz

Lake

Topaz

Ranch

Estates

Zephyr Cove

PYRAMID LAKE

PAIUTE (pt)

STEWART

WALKER

RIVER (pt)

YERINGTON

DRESSLER- VILLE

CAMPBELL

CARSON

FALLON PAIUTE- SHOSHONE (COLONY) (pt)

WASHOE RANCHES (pt)

WASHOE

RANCHES (pts)

GARDNERVILLE- MINDEN

GENOAJACKS

VALLEY

PINE NUT

TOPAZ LAKE

ZEPHYR

COVE

DAYTON

FERNLEY

SILVER SPRINGS

SMITH VALLEY

YERINGTON

Lake

Tahoe

119°

119°

119°30’

119°30’

120°

120°

39°30’

39°30’

39°

39°

38°30’

38°30’

American Indian Areas, Counties,

Independent City, County Subdivisions, and Other Places - Inset B

0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles
Maps Nevada E-7

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

CLARK

BOULDER CITY

HENDERSON

LAS

VEGAS

MESQUITE

NORTH LAS VEGAS

Enterprise

Moapa Town

Moapa Valley

Mount

Charleston

Nellis AFB

Nelson

Goodsprings

Indian Springs

Laughlin

Blue Diamond

Bunkerville

Cal-Nev-Ari

Paradise

Sandy Valley

Searchlight

Spring

Valley

Summerlin South

Sunrise

Manor

Whitney

Winchester

FORT

MOJAVE (pt)

LAS VEGAS (pt)

LAS VEGAS (pt)

MOAPA RIVER

CLARK

LAS

VEGAS

Lake Mead 114°

114°30’

114°30’

115°

115°

115°30’

115°30’

36°30’

36°30’

36°

36°

35°30’

35°30’

35°

35°

American Indian Areas, Counties,

Independent City, County Subdivisions, and Other Places - Inset C

0 5 10 15 Kilometers

0 5 10 15 Miles
E-8 Nevada Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

CALIFORNIA

Carson City

Elko

Fallon Fernley

Gardnerville

Ranchos

Las Vegas

Paradise

Pahrump

Reno Sparks

CALIFORNIA

CHURCHILL

CLARK

DOUGLAS

ELKO

ESMERALDA

EUREKA

HUMBOLDT

LANDER

LINCOLN

LYON

WASHOE

WHITE PINE

MINERAL

NYE

PERSHING

STOREY CARSON

CITY*

UTAH

ARIZONA

OREGON IDAHO

Elko

Fallon

Fernley

Gardnerville

Ranchos

Pahrump

CARSON CITY

LAS VEGAS-PARADISE

RENOSPARKS

Las Vegas-Paradise-Pahrump

RenoSparksFernley

Sacramento--

Arden-Arcade--

Yuba City

(Part)

114°

114°

115°

115°

116°

116°

117°

117°

118°

118°

119°

119°

120°

120°

42° 42°

41° 41°

40° 40°

39° 39°

38° 38°

37° 37°

36° 36°

35° 35°

Core Based Statistical Areas, Counties, Independent City, and Principal Cities

0 20 40 60 Miles

0 20 40 60 Kilometers

LEGEND

Las Vegas-Paradise-Pahrump Combined Statistical Area

Fallon Micropolitan Statistical Area

RENO-SPARKS Metropolitan Statistical Area

CBSA boundaries and names are as of December 2009. All

other boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010.

CALIFORNIA State

CARSON CITY* Independent City

CLARKE County

Carson City Principal City

State capital underlined

County outside Nevada
Maps Nevada E-9

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Urban Areas

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

ARIZONA

CALIFORNIA

OREGON IDAHO

UTAH

CARSON CITY

LAS VEGAS--

HENDERSON

RENO,

NV--CA

Battle

Mountain

Bullhead City, AZ--NV

Boulder

City

Dayton

Fallon Fernley

Elko

Ely

Gardnerville

Ranchos

Hawthorne

Incline Village, NV--CA

Johnson

Lane

Laughlin

Washoe Valley

West Wendover, NV--UT

Yerington South Lake

Tahoe, CA--NV

Spring Creek North

Spring Creek South

Mesquite, NV--AZ

Moapa Valley

Pahrump

Winnemucca

114°

114°

115°

115°

116°

116°

117°

117°

118°

118°

119°

119°

120°

120°

42° 42°

41° 41°

40° 40°

39° 39°

38° 38°

37° 37°

36° 36°

35° 35°

± 0 10 20 30 Kilometers

0 10 20 30 Miles

LEGEND

URBANIZED AREA

All legal and statistical area boundaries are as

of January 1, 2010. Urban Areas are based 

on results from the 2010 Decennial Census.

# Urban Cluster

County or Equivalent Area Boundary

STATE