alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FLATBUSH FEDERAL BANCORP, INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we,
Anthony J. Monteverdi, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and John S. Lotardo, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                                                /s/ Anthony J. Monteverdi
                                                -----------------------------
                                                Anthony J. Monteverdi
                                                Chairman, President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                                /s/ John S. Lotardo
                                                -----------------------------
                                                John S. Lotardo
                                                Vice President and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

Date: 08/16/04


                                       16
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Kimball International,Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I, Robert F. Schneider, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 

 

|   | /s/ Robert F. Schneider                                                     |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | ROBERT F. SCHNEIDER    Executive Vice President,    Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | August 30, 2010                                                             |   |
Case No. 6,736.

#### HOUSE v. CASH.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 73.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term. 1813.

Depositions — Admissibility op — Time op Taking.

When notice is given that a deposition will be taken between certain hours, it is not necessary to wait till the last hour.

Mr. Taylor, for defendant,

objected to a deposition, because the defendant attended at three o’clock, and the deposition had been taken before that hour; the notice being that it would be taken between the hours of 11 a. m. and 5 p. m. He contended that the plaintiff was bound to keep open the examination during the whole time.

But THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge,)

overruled the objection.
No. 54060.

#### Henry L. Goetz et al. *v.*United States,

protests 143579-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 58028.

protests 207486-K etc. (New York).

#### Leading Forwarders, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veils or veilings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57645, the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Bulletin No. 2018-04

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to Bulletin No. 2017-06, U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) - A Treasury

Financial Manual (TFM) Supplement

1. Purpose-This TFM Bulletin notifies agencies that Part 2 of the USSGL Supplement has been revised

for Fiscal Year (FY) 2018.

2. Summary of Changes-The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. The

summary header "Consolidated" refers to all changes to date for FY 2017 and FY 2018.

3. Changes by Part/Section/File

Part 2-FY 2018 Reporting changes to files in Sections III, IV, V, VI, and VII:

Section III: Account Transactions

Transactions

T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

USSGL Account Attribute Definition Report

USSGL Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2018 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

Statement of Changes in Net Position

Statement of Budgetary Resources 

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources & Schedule P

Budget Program and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2018 Reporting

Reclassified Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position

Page 1 of 2
Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2018 Reporting

Validation Summary

Validation Detail

Edit Summary

Edit Detail

Closing Edits

4. Effective Date

This Bulletin is effective immediately.

5. Inquiries

Direct questions concerning this Bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Jaime M. Saling

Director, Financial Reports and Analysis Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Telephone: 304-480-6485

Fax: 304-480-5176

Date: March 21, 2018

Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0211

CITY OF MISSOULA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SCOTT ANTHONY CHARLIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until October 6, 2023, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s opening brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 30 2023

08/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0211
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

GARDEN CITY BOXING CLUB, INC.,

NO. CIV. S-04-1860 FCD GGH

Plaintiff,

ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

v. RE: SANCTIONS

SALVADOR PEREZ, 

Defendant.

----oo0oo----

Plaintiff filed this action on September 7, 2004.

On October 26, 2004, plaintiff filed a return of service

executed as to the only defendant. On June 22, 2005, the

court issued a minute order directing plaintiff’s counsel to

file a Joint Status Report no later than July 18, 2005. As

of August 18, 2005 no report has been filed. 

Accordingly, the court makes the following orders:

1. Plaintiff’s counsel is ordered to show cause why he 

should not be sanctioned in the amount of $150.00 for failing to

file a joint status report and to show cause why plaintiff's case

Case 2:04-cv-01860-FCD-GGH Document 6 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. 

2. Plaintiff’s counsel shall file a response to the order

to show cause on or before August 30, 2005.

3. A hearing on this order to show cause is set for

Friday, September 9, 2005 at 10:00 a.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 18, 2005.

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL, Jr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01860-FCD-GGH Document 6 Filed 08/18/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4608 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4608

To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to authorize the 
         use of individual training accounts for certain youth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2024

 Mr. Hickenlooper introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act to authorize the 
         use of individual training accounts for certain youth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Building Youth Workforce Skills 
Act''.

SEC. 2. YOUTH WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACTIVITIES.

    Section 129(c) of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (29 
U.S.C. 3164(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(9) Individual training accounts.--Funds allocated as 
        described in paragraph (1) to a local area may be used to pay, 
        through an individual training account, an eligible provider of 
        training services described in section 122(d)(1) for training 
        services described in section 134(c)(3) provided to an in-
        school youth who is not younger than age 16 and not older than 
        age 21, or any out-of-school youth, in the same manner that an 
        individual training account is used to pay an eligible provider 
        of training services under subparagraphs (F)(iii) and (G) of 
        section 134(c)(3) for training services provided to an adult or 
        dislocated worker.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOCK McNEELY,

Petitioner,

v.

LOU BLANAS,

Respondent.

 /

Civ. S-00-1358 DFL PAN P

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER

DOCK McNEELY, Civ. S-00-1508 WBS DAD

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.

Defendants.

 /

DOCK McNEELY, Civ. S-00-2797 DFL PAN P

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.

Defendants.

 /

Case 2:04-cv-01215-DFL -PAN Document 54 Filed 02/01/06 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

DOCK McNEELY, Civ. S-01-2084 EJG GGH P

Plaintiff,

v.

ROY K. SIMMONS, et al.

Defendants.

 /

DOCK McNEELY, Civ. S-03-2172 DFL PAN 

Plaintiff,

v.

EDWARD BONNER, et al.

Defendants.

 /

DOCK McNEELY, Civ. S-04-0062 DFL PAN 

Plaintiff,

v.

LOU BLANAS, et al.

Defendants.

 /

DOCK McNEELY, Civ. S-04-1215 DFL PAN 

Plaintiff,

v.

EDWARD BONNER, et al.

Defendants.

 /

Case 2:04-cv-01215-DFL -PAN Document 54 Filed 02/01/06 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

DOCK McNEELY, Civ. S-05-1401 MCE DAD

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.

Defendants.

 /

DOCK McNEELY, Civ. S-05-2549 WBS DAD

Plaintiff,

v.

PLACER COUNTY, et al.

Defendants.

 /

A Notice of Related Cases was filed concerning the above

captioned cases on December 16, 2005. See Local Rule 83-123

(E.D. Cal. 2005). On review of the cases, the court finds that

the cases ought not be related or reassigned. This order is

issued for informational purposes only, and shall have no effect

on the status of the cases, including any previous Related (or

Non-Related) Case Order of this court. Therefore, they shall not

be considered related.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 1/31/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01215-DFL -PAN Document 54 Filed 02/01/06 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

4

Case 2:04-cv-01215-DFL -PAN Document 54 Filed 02/01/06 Page 4 of 4
No. 58551.

protests 165389-K, etc. (Buffalo).

#### Carey & Skinner, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of internal-combustion gasoline engines, carburetor type, or parts thereof, in chief value of metal, imported separately or in a knocked-down condition, with saws or together with an assortment of saw parts, and that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the engines, imported with saws, the subject of Geo. *S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0047 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0047

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on readmission (8779/2006 - COM(2006)0191 - C6-0168/2006 - 2006/0064(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 287 E , 29/11/2007 P. 0510 - 0510 *

P6_TA(2007)0047

EC-Russia Readmission Agreement *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council decision concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and the Russian Federation on readmission (8779/2006 — COM(2006)0191 — C6-0168/2006 — 2006/0064(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council decision (COM(2006)0191) [1],

- having regard to Articles 63(3)(b) and 300(2), first subparagraph, first sentence, of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0168/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Foreign Affairs (A6-0028/2007),

1. Approves the conclusion of the Agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Russian Federation.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
No. 60854.

#### Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc., and J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 227521-K and 229435-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal dime savings banks the same in all material respects as those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Luna Innovations Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dale E. Messick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DALE E. MESSICK    
|Dale E. Messick        
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 6,
2008.
Exhibit 10.5

 

Execution Version

 

NorthStar Asset Management Group, Inc.

 

October 13, 2016

 

Albert Tylis

c/o NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc.

399 Park Avenue, 18th Floor

New York, NY  10022

 

Dear Al:

 

The purpose of this letter is to amend the letter agreement entered into by and among you Northstar Asset Management Group Inc. (“NSAM”) and NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (“NRF”) dated as of June 2, 2016 (the “Original Letter Agreement”).  All capitalized terms in this letter that are not otherwise defined will have the meaning set forth in the Original Letter Agreement.

 

The parties acknowledge and agree that the last sentence of the third paragraph of the Original Letter Agreement will be deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:

 

“The number of Shares subject to the Replacement Award will be determined by dividing (i) $29,930,569 by (ii) the greater of (A) the volume weighted average price of a Share over the first five trading days immediately following the Closing Date and (B) $15 per Share.”

 

Except as expressly amended hereby, the Original Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms.

 

This letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

 

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 











 

Please sign below to indicate your acknowledgement and acceptance of the terms of this side letter.

 

 

	
 
    	
Very   truly yours, 

 

NORTHSTAR   ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   RONALD J. LIEBERMAN
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Ronald   J. Lieberman
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Executive   Vice President, General counsel & Secretary
    


 

 

Agreed to and acknowledged

as of the 13th day of October, 2016:

 

 

	
/s/ ALBERT TYLIS
    	
 
    


 

[SIGNATURE PAGE TYLIS SIDE LETTER]

 











 

Agreed to and acknowledged by:

 

NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP.

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   DEBRA A. HESS
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Debra   A. Hess
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Chief   Financial Officer
    	
 
    


 

[SIGNATURE PAGE TYLIS SIDE LETTER]
(Reap. Dec. 10743)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1928.

(Decided May 5, 1964)

*Broohs & Broohs*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Oourt, that the merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement herein consists of tires, tubes and rim tapes exported from Holland.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such merchandise as that specified below was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the *543usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, were the following unit invoiced prices net packed:

> Invoice

> Tubes Per 100

> 4000 24 X 1.75 butyl $31.50

> Rim Tapes Per 100

> 4000 $2.77

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such merchandise as the remainder of the merchandise specified on the invoice herein was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market’ of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States were the appraised unit prices less 3% net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal to re-appraisement herein may be submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is statutory export value and hold that such value for the items enumerated below is as follows:

> Invoice

> Tubes Per 100

> 4,000 24 X 1.75 butyl $31.50

> Rim Tapes

> 4,000 $2.77

and that for all other merchandise included on the invoice, covered by the entry involved herein, said statutory value is the appraised unit prices, less 3 per centum, net, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Ronald B. Clark, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jafra Worldwide Holdings (Lux) S.àr.l.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and
5.  The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Date    May 16, 2005               /s/ RONALD B. CLARK   Ronald B. Clark   Chief Executive Officer   
54