alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

NO. CIV. S-04-1986 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISPOSAL

DOCUMENTS AFTER

NATOMAS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Counsel has informed the court that the parties have settled

the above-captioned case. The court now orders that the

dispositional documents disposing of the case be filed no later

than seventy-five (75) days from the effective date of this order.

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby

VACATED.

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01986-LKK -DAD Document 70 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 29, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01986-LKK -DAD Document 70 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4467 

To reauthorize the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Hong Kong Human Rights and 

Democracy Act of 2019. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hong Kong Human 

5 Rights and Democracy Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIRE7 MENT. 

8 Section 5 of the Hong Kong Human Rights and De9 mocracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116–76; 22 U.S.C. 

10 5701 note) is amended by striking ‘‘7 years after’’ and 

11 inserting ‘‘12 years after’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4467 IS

1 SEC. 3. SUNSET. 

2 Section 7(h) of the Hong Kong Human Rights and 

3 Democracy Act of 2019 (Public Law 116–76; 22 U.S.C. 

4 5701 note) is amended by striking ‘‘5 years after’’ and 

5 inserting ‘‘10 years after’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 46729.

#### Protest 66098-K of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. (New York).

*422Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the lighter parts are similar to those the subject of *Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc.*v. *United States*(1 Cust. Ct. 301, C. D. 70) and Abstract 41307. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at two-thirds of 1 cent each and two-fifths of 1 cent per dozen for each 1 cent the value exceeds 20 cents per dozen and 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1527 in view of T. D. 48316.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO KEOLA,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1935 FCD GGH P

vs.

M. KNOWLES, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 20, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01935-FCD-GGH Document 10 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 20, 2005, are adopted in full;

and 

2. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

DATED:August 22, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01935-FCD-GGH Document 10 Filed 08/23/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EnerNOC, Inc. (the “Company”), for the quarter ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Timothy G. Healy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Neil Moses, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 7, 2015





By:/s/ Timothy G. HealyTimothy G. HealyChief Executive OfficerBy:/s/ Neil MosesNeil MosesChief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 24



                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, an officer and/or director
of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, a North Carolina holding company, does hereby
constitute and appoint John D. Hopkins, Robert A. Reed, Richard T. Stange, and
Andrea H. Fox, and each of them (with full power of substitution to appoint any
Senior Officer, Vice President, Secretary or Assistant Secretary of the Company)
as his or her true and lawful attorney and agent, to do any and all acts and
things and to execute any and all instruments which said attorney and agent may
deem necessary or advisable to enable the Corporation to comply with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission in respect thereof, in
connection with the filing of the annual report for the year 2000 or any later
year on Form 10-K, including specifically, but without limiting the generality
of the foregoing, the power and authority to sign for and on behalf of the
undersigned the name of the undersigned as officer and/or director of the said
corporation to any such Form 10-K or to any amendment thereto filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and to any instrument or document filed as
part of, as an exhibit to or in connection with, said Form 10-K; and the
undersigned does hereby ratify and confirm as his own act and deed all that said
attorney and agent (or the substitute) shall do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed these presents.


(SEAL)
                                              __________________________________
                                              Name:
                                              Date:  February 12, 2001
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

# AGENCY:

Bureau of International Labor Affairs, Office of Trade and Labor Affairs, Department of Labor. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice extends the closing date for SGA 07-04 until April 9, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Lisa Harvey, Department of Labor, Procurement Services Center, Room S-4307, 200 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington DC 20210, Telephone (202) 693-4592, e-mail:                         *Harvey-lisa@dol.gov.*

Signed this 5th day of March 2007. 

Lisa Harvey, 

Grant Officer. 

[FR Doc. E7-4181 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-28-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

) 2:04-cv-2299-GEB-GGH

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

RENEE M. ENRIQUEZ, NICHOL )

ENRIQUEZ, JUSTIN ENRIQUEZ, )

)

Defendants. )

)

)

THE UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

) 2:05-cv-2162-MCE-JFM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

CHRISTINA GOODMAN and RENEE M. ) ORDER RELATING CASES

ENRIQUEZ, )

)

Defendants. )

)

On November 29, 2005, Defendant Renee M. Enriquez filed a

“Notice of Related Cases” in the above actions. Examination of the

actions reveals they are related within the meaning of Local Rule 83-

123(a). Accordingly, the assignment of the actions to the same judge

Case 2:04-cv-02299-GEB-GGH Document 26 Filed 12/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

and magistrate judge is likely to effect a substantial savings of

judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties.

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under

Local Rule 83-123 merely results in the actions being assigned to the

same judge and magistrate judge; no consolidation of the actions is

effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are

generally assigned to the judge and magistrate judge to whom the first

filed action was assigned. 

Therefore, action number 2:05-cv-2162-MCE-JFM is reassigned

to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., and Magistrate Judge Gregory G.

Hollows for all further proceedings. Henceforth, the caption on

documents filed in the reassigned case shall show the action number as 

“2:05-cv-2162-GEB-GGH.” Further, any dates currently set in this

reassigned case only are VACATED and the Clerk of Court is directed to

issue an Order Setting Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference in the

reassigned case. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate

for this reassignment.

DATED: December 27, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-02299-GEB-GGH Document 26 Filed 12/27/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY DORAN

Plaintiff,

v.

R&D FOODS, INC. DBA CARL’S JR.;

CARL KARCHER ENTERPRISES; JACK

R. BRINK, TRUSTEES OF THE BRINK

FAMILY TRUST, et al.,

Defendant.

 

Case No. CIV.S-04-1806 LKK CMK

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S04-1806 LKK CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: May 24, 2005. /s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01806-LKK -CMK Document 14 Filed 05/24/05 Page 1 of 1
- 1 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. (SBN 208436) 

AZIMY & NATHAN, LLP 

18500 Von Karman Ave., Suite 500 

Irvine, California 92612 

Phone: (949) 486-1888 

Fax: (949) 486-1889 

Email: r.n@azimynathan.com 

 e.a@azimynathan.com 

Attorneys of Record for Plaintiff, 

JOSEPH ABDULLAH 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSEPH ABDULLAH, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 

 v. 

CHOICE GAS & MINIMART; NORTH 

SACRAMENTO LAND CO., INC.; BP 

WEST COAST PRODUCTS, LLC and 

Does 1 through 10, inclusive. 

 

 Defendants. 

Case No.: 2:04-cv-1733 MCE JFM 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

AND ORDER THEREON 

 F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1)

/// 

/// 

/// 

Case 2:04-cv-01733-MCE -JFM Document 15 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 3
- 2 - 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(1) Plaintiff Joseph Abdullah and Defendants 

1500 Del Paso Blvd., Inc. and North Sacramento Land Co., Inc., through their 

attorneys undersigned, stipulate and agree that the above-captioned matter may be 

dismissed as to all claims and all defendants, with prejudice, each party to bear his 

own attorneys’ fees and costs. 

DATED: March 31, 2006 AZIMY & NATHAN, LLP 

 By: /s/ Reuben D. Nathan, Esq.

 Reuben D. Nathan, Esq. 

 Attorney for Plaintiff, 

 Joseph Abdullah 

DATED: March 23, 2006 EMPLOYMENT RIGHTS 

ATTORNEYS 

 By: /s/ Richard D. Schramm, Esq. as authorized on March 23, 2006

 Richard D. Schramm, Esq. 

Attorney for Defendants, 

1500 Del Paso Blvd., Inc. and North 

Sacramento Land Co., Inc.

Case 2:04-cv-01733-MCE -JFM Document 15 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 3
- 3 - 

1 ORDER

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, 

IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned matter is dismissed as to all 

claims and all defendants, with prejudice, each party to bear his own attorneys’ 

fees and costs. 

Dated: April 10, 2006

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01733-MCE -JFM Document 15 Filed 04/11/06 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2484

CHARLES GRAY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES L. ELLIS ALDRIDGE; ODESSA CLARK, her

heirs, successors, and assigns, individually;

GROVER LEE MOORE, his heirs, successors and

assigns, individually; ANNIE MOORE, her heirs,

successors, and assigns, individually; JOHN H.

HARMON, Attorney at Law; CARRIE M. GODETTE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

CLEVELAND CLARK; DAVID M. ALDRIDGE; ANNIE MAE

ALDRIDGE; SALOMON MOORE; JOHN I. MORGAN,

Register of Deeds of Beaufort County; BETTY

WAILARD, Deputy Beaufort County Register of

Deeds; BEAUFORT COUNTY, North Carolina,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,

District Judge. (CA-93-152-4-H)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: April 22, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.
2
3

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Gray, Appellant Pro Se. Milton E. Moore, MOORE, MOORE &

RODGERS, Williamston, North Carolina; James Wilson Swindell, High

Point, North Carolina; John H. Harmon, HARMON & RAYNOR, New Bern,

North Carolina; Franics Blackwell Stith, STITH & STITH, P.A., New

Bern, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his Complaint for failure to prosecute, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.

41(b). Our review of the record and the district court's order

adopting the recommendations of the magistrate judge disclose no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Gray v. Aldridge, No. CA-93-152-4-H (E.D.N.C. May

25, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case No. 7,871.

#### KLOTS et al. v. The RED JACKET.

[N. Y. Times.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Feb. 6, 1863.

Collision — Weight op Evidence of Passengers.

[In collision cases the testimony of passengers, who have no practical knowledge of seamanship, should be received with caution.]

This case was a libel filed by the owners of the schooner Henry Ransom to recover the damages occasioned to her by a collision with the steamer on June 2, 1860. The libelant alleged that the schooner was bound from Elizabethport, New Jersey, to Pawtucket, Rhode Island, with a cargo of coal. That while in the channel leading from Elizabethport to the Kills, the wind being fresh from the north, and the schooner elosehauled on her larboard tack, with a double-reefed mainsail, she saw the steamer, which had left Staten Island, bound for Elizabethport, and was heading north of the schooner. That the channel was three hundred feet wide, and there was room enough for the steamer to have passed on that side, but the steamer sheered to the south, and crowded on the schooner, which at the last moment ported her helm to avoid the collision, but too late. The Elizabeth-port and New York Ferry Company, claimants of the steamer, denied the case set .up by the libelants, and alleged that the collision was caused by the schooner’s crossing the channel and running into the steamboat

Scudder & Carter, for libelants.

Mr. Morton, for claimants.

SHIPMAN, District Judge.

This libel is brought to recover damages for a collision which occurred in the Kills on the 2d of June, 1860, which resulted in the sinking of the schooner of the libelants, as they allege, through the carelessness of those in charge of the steamer. The case presents an instance of the obstinate and irreconcilable conflict of evidence. The collision of the witnesses is as palpable as that of the vessels. But I think that the narrative of those on board the schooner is the more clear, intelligent and reliable. It is certainly more so than the account given by those in charge of the steamer, and, were it not for the testimony of some passengers on board of the latter, the weight of evidence would be clearly in favor of the libelants. The testimony of passengers, however, who have -no practical knowledge of the navigation of vessels, is not always reliable in cases of collision of this character. To the greater clearness and consistency of the li-belants' witnesses must be added the character and direction of the wound inflicted on the hull of the schooner by the stem of the steamer. This wound, as it stands clearly on the proofs, could not have beén produced by a collision at the angle described by the claimants’ witnesses, while its shape and direction tend directly to confirm the witnesses for the libelants. And I think it shows with reasonable certainty that the steamer was at fault in not giving the schooner sufficient room, under the circumstances, to pass safely to the southward of her. Decree for libelants, with a reference.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10530-10531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4085]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Security for the Protection of the Public Indemnification of 
Passenger for Nonperformance of Transportation; Notice of Issuance of 
Certificate (Performance)

    Notice is hereby given that the following have been issued a 
Certificate of Financial Responsibility for

[[Page 10531]]

Indemnification of Passengers for Nonperformance of Transportation 
pursuant to the provisions of Section 3, Public Law 89-777 (46 App. 
U.S.C. 817 (e)) and the Federal Maritime Commission's implementing 
regulations at 46 CFR part 540, as amended:

Ambassadors International, Inc., Ambassadors Cruise Group, LLC d/b/a 
Majestic America Line, DQSC Operations, LLC d/b/a Delta Queen Steamboat 
Company, American West Steamboat Company LLC d/b/a American West 
Steamboat Company, DQ Boat, LLC and AQ Boat, LLC, MQ Boat, LLC, EN Boat 
LLC, QW Boat LLC, 1071 Camelback Street, Newport Beach, CA 92660.
Vessels: AMERICAN QUEEN, DELTA QUEEN, MISSISSIPPI QUEEN, EMPRESS OF THE 
NORTH, QUEEN OF THE WEST, COLUMBIA QUEEN.

Fred Olsen Cruise Lines Ltd., Fred. Olsen House, White House Road, 
Ipswich, Suff IP1 5LL, United Kingdom.
Vessel: BALMORAL.

MSC Corciere S.P.A. d/b/a MSC Cruises, Piazza Garibaldi 91, Naples, 
80142 Italy.
Vessel: MUSICA, OPERA, LIRICA.

    Dated: March 2, 2007.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4085 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
**EPA, California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR), Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory** 

**Authority (PMRA) discuss imidacloprid pollinator fi eld studies with Bayer CropScience (Bayer)** 
**Monday December 16, 2013**
California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR ): Ann Prichard, Liz Pelham, Denise Alder, Rich Bireley, John Troiano, Jill Townzen, Marylou V erder-Carlos,
Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Authorit y (PMRA): Connie Hart, Wayne Hou, Tina Singal, Mary Mitchell, Nicole Lauro, Barbara Martinovic-Bar rett
Bayer CropScience: David Fischer, Clive Halder, Li sa Bowers, Allen Olmstead, Jeff Parsons, Pete Cody, Dana Sergeant
EPA: Rusty Wasem, Tom Moriarty, Neil Anderson, Ste ven Snyderman, Keith Sappington, Anita Pease, Don Brady, Clayton Myers, Elizabeth Hill, Michael W agman, TJ Wyatt, Carissa Cyran, Meghan Radtke, Michelle Ranville, Frank Faruggia

All three Agencies participated in a conference cal l with Bayer to discuss upcoming pollinator field effects studies required to support the registratio n review of imidacloprid. Rationales for requiring the studies and timing of the studies were discussed as were how the Agencies intend to use the studies fo r risk assessment and risk management.
No. 50445.

Suit 4506

#### *United States*v. *Samuel Dunkel & Co., Inc.*

C. D. 899 reversed July 3, 1945. C. A. D. 317.
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nigel W. Bennett, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A of OpenTV Corp. for the period ended December 31, 2008; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
April 30, 2009



/s/    NIGEL W.
BENNETTChief Executive Officer