alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

December 23, 1953

No. 57713.

#### J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 187381-K (New York).

*355Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of copper scrap in the shape of rough bars of ingots, of which copper is the component material of chief value, which is secondhand and fit only to be remanu-factured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to entry free of import taxes as well as duty.
Exhibit 23-1.a



                  CONSENT OF COUNSEL


     As Senior Vice President-Corporate Services and
Secretary of Great Plains Energy Incorporated, I have
reviewed the statements as to matters of law and legal
conclusions in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, and consent to the
incorporation by reference of such statements in the
Company's previously-filed Form S-3 Registration
Statement (Registration No. 33-51799) and Form S-8
Registration Statements (Registration No. 33-45618 and
Registration No. 333-32636).



                          /s/Jeanie Sell Latz
                          Jeanie Sell Latz


Kansas City, Missouri
February 26, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN HUBBS,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-2256-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

STEVEN MAYBERG,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 18, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-02256-GEB-DAD Document 69 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 18, 2006 are adopted in full;

2. Defendant’s January 24, 2006 motion for summary judgment is granted with

regard to plaintiff’s federal claims;

3. Plaintiff’s supplemental state law claims are dismissed without prejudice; and

4. This action is dismissed.

Dated: September 19, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02256-GEB-DAD Document 69 Filed 09/20/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

November 19, 1947

No. 52035.

#### Sunrise Co. *v.*United States,

protest 130139-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of music boxes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Thorens Co.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 165, C. D. 965). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roy
Brown, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
13th day of September, 2007.


/s/ Roy Brown
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:04-cv-01868-MCE -KJM   Document 15    Filed 03/20/06   Page 1 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-01868-MCE -KJM   Document 15    Filed 03/20/06   Page 2 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-01868-MCE -KJM   Document 15    Filed 03/20/06   Page 3 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-01868-MCE -KJM   Document 15    Filed 03/20/06   Page 4 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-01868-MCE -KJM   Document 15    Filed 03/20/06   Page 5 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-01868-MCE -KJM   Document 15    Filed 03/20/06   Page 6 of 6
---

---

Exhibit 13.(a).1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Partner Communications Company Ltd. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.        The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

2.        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 10, 2007

| |  | /s/ David Avner
David AvnerChief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 10, 2007

| |  | /s/ Emanuel Avner
Emanuel AvnerChief Financial Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: RELINQUISHMENT OF: D.L.W., JR.,

A MINOR

PETITION OF: B.M.

- W., NATURAL

MOTHER :

:

:

:

:

: No. 570 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 1st day of December, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Before the First Division,

November 13, 1947

No. 52018.

#### Paramount Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 131844-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of alabaster glass beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020). In accordance therewith the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10201-10202]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3976]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-38-000]


Maine Public Utilities Commission, Complainant, v. ISO New 
England, Inc, Respondent; Notice of Complaint

February 28, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 26, 2007, the Maine Public Utilities 
Commission tendered for filing a complaint asking the Commission for an 
order finding that Schedule 2 of the ISO New England, Inc., (ISO-NE), 
Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT), is unjust and unreasonable; and 
directing ISO-NE to modify Schedule 2 of its OATT as described in the 
instant Complaint.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to

[[Page 10202]]

the proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice 
of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The 
Respondent's answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on 
or before the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to 
intervene, and protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adebe8ffeee2c3c1c4c3c8fed8ddddc2dfd9edcbc8dfce83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4e080b1c0d01202227202b1d3b3e3e213c3a0e282b3c2d60292138">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 19, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3976 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

Notice is hereby given that Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., 160 Bovet Road, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94402, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings Which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity/debt security financing to Intacct Corporation (“Intacct”), 125 S. Market Street, Suite 600, San Jose, CA 95113. The financing is contemplated to bridge the company's operations until either the round of equity is raised or a sale occurs. 

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Emergence Capital Partners, L.P. and Emergence Capital Associates, L.P., all Associates of Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., own more than ten percent of Intacct, and therefore Intacct is considered an Associate of Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. as detailed in § 107.50 of the Regulations. 

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416. 

 Dated: January 11, 2007. 

Jaime Guzmán-Fournier, 

Associate Administrator for Investment .

 [FR Doc. E7-3785 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 31.2CERTIFICATIONSI, Enrique Marco, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jafra Worldwide Holdings (Lux) S.àr.l.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date November 10, 2006       /s/ ENRIQUE MARCO Enrique Marco    Chief Financial Officer    (Principal Financial Officer)  
64
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES

THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF THE COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES:

|NAME                         |  | ORGANIZED UNDER LAWS OF |  | PERCENTAGE OF VOTING
SECURITIES OWNED BY
KEANE, INC. |  
|---------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------- | -
|Dataskills, Inc.             |  | Massachusetts           |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane Federal Systems, Inc.  |  | Delaware                |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane Canada, Inc.           |  | Canada                  |  | 100                                                  | %
|169963 Canada, Inc.          |  | Canada                  |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane Securities Corporation |  | Massachusetts           |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane UK Ltd.                |  | United Kingdom          |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane Ltd.                   |  | United Kingdom          |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane Business Trust         |  | Massachusetts           |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane Care, Inc              |  | Washington              |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane Services Company       |  | California              |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane India Holdings, Inc.   |  | Delaware                |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane Mauritius Ltd. One     |  | Mauritius               |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane Mauritius Ltd. Two     |  | Mauritius               |  | 100                                                  | %
|Keane India Ltd.             |  | India                   |  | 100                                                  | %
|Worldzen, Inc.               |  | Delaware                |  | 80                                                   | %

---
No. 50980.

#### Protests 76423-K, etc., of Columbia Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise *251consist of a commodity the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247); On the stipulated facts the merchandise, which includes salt as a substantial component part thereof, was excluded from paragraph 5 and held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
PUBLIC LAW 111–301—DEC. 14, 2010 124 STAT. 3271 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5773: 

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 111–592 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure). 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 156 (2010): 

Sept. 15, considered and passed House. 

Dec. 1, considered and passed Senate. 

Æ 

Public Law 111–301 

111th Congress 

An Act 

To designate the Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in Baltimore, 

Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security Administration Operations 

Building, as the ‘‘Robert M. Ball Federal Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION. 

The Federal building located at 6401 Security Boulevard in 

Baltimore, Maryland, commonly known as the Social Security 

Administration Operations Building, shall be known and designated 

as the ‘‘Robert M. Ball Federal Building’’. 

SEC. 2. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred 

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Robert 

M. Ball Federal Building’’. 

Approved December 14, 2010. 

Dec. 14, 2010 

[H.R. 5773] 


bjneal on DSKFP91QD1PROD with PUBLAWS
No. 59008.

protest 244864-K (New York).

#### Davies, Turner & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2999511-JAN-201112:52 PM
Exhibit



Exhibit  10(iii)A(59)



AMENDMENT No. 6
TO
ACUITY BRANDS, INC
AMENDED AND RESTATED SEVERANCE AGREEMENT




THIS AMENDMENT made and entered into as of the 24th day of October, 2016, by and between ACUITY BRANDS, INC. (the “Company”) and MARK A. BLACK (“Executive”);


W I T N E S S E T H


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive entered into a Severance Agreement, dated as of November 19, 2008 (“Severance Agreement”), and amended as of October 28, 2009, March 30, 2010, March 28, 2014, October 27, 2014, and October 26, 2015, providing for the payment of certain compensation and benefits to Executive if Executive’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances; and


WHEREAS, the parties now desire to amend the Severance Agreement in the manner hereinafter provided;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Severance Agreement is hereby amended, as follows:


1.
Section 4.2 is hereby amended by deleting “100%” from clause (i) and substituting “120%” in lieu thereof.
2.
This Amendment to the Severance Agreement shall be effective as of the date of this Amendment.  Except as hereby modified, the Severance Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


COMPANY


EXECUTIVE                     ACUITY BRANDS, INC.






______________________________        By:  ______________________________
MARK A. BLACK                            Vernon J. Nagel
        Chairman, President and CEO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Application and Order to Extend Time 1 874627v4 33863/0001 

ROBERT R. RUBIN, ESQ. (117428) 

McDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN PC 

Attorneys at Law 

555 Capitol Mall, 9th Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Phone: 916.444.3900 

Fax: 916.444.8334 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

DAVID S. SAVAGE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID S. SAVAGE, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. CIV.S-04-2316 WBS KJM 

APPLICATION TO EXTEND THE 

TIME TO CONDUCT THE HEARING 

ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Counterclaim Plaintiff, 

v. 

DAVID S. SAVAGE and PHYLISS SAVAGE, 

Counterclaim Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Hearing Date: December 12, 2005 

Location: Courtroom 5, 14th Floor 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Currently before the Court is Defendant The United States of America's Motion for Summary 

Judgment against Plaintiff David Savage. The hearing on said motion is currently set for 

December 12, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5. 

The Parties respectfully apply, and hereby stipulate pursuant to LR 83-143 and LR 6-144, to 

an extension of time to continue the hearing to January 9, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5 before 

the Honorable Judge Shubb. This is the Parties' first application for an extension of time. The 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02316-WBS -KJM Document 27 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Application and Order to Extend Time 2 874627v4 33863/0001 

extension is requested due to Plaintiff's counsel's heavy workload during time allotted to Oppose. 

Pursuant to LR 78-230, any Opposition to the Motion shall be due no later than December 27, 2005. 

DATED: November 18 , 2005 

McDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN PC 

Attorneys at Law 

By: __s/Robert R. Rubin_____________________ 

Robert R. Rubin 

Attorneys for Plaintiff David S. Savage 

DATED: November 18 , 2005 

McGREGOR W. SCOTT 

United States Attorney 

By: __s/Richard A. Latterell__________________ 

Richard A. Latterell 

U.S. Department of Justice 

Attorneys for the United States of America 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 18, 2005 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-02316-WBS -KJM Document 27 Filed 11/21/05 Page 2 of 2