alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.



                               /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


                               /s/ Christine R. Piano
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Christine R. Piano
                               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


August 4, 2006
(Reap. Dec. 10429)

#### Western Dairy Products, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. DE-49003.

*372(Decided January 14, 1963)

*Glad*& *Tuttle (.Bdward N. Glad*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Morris- Braverman,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

JOHNSON, Judge:

When this appeal for reappraisement was called for trial, it was submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> Mb. Glad: If it idease the Court, I offer to stipulate that the merchandise involved herein consists of Colby cheese exported from Australia on or about February 28,1962.

> I further offer to stipulate that during the period of exportation there was no foreign or export value for such or similar merchandise as defined by the statute, and that the freely offered United States value for such or similar merchandise was 24.8 cents per pound, net packed.

> Mb. Bbaverman : From information obtained from Examiner Max Ringell, at the Port of Los Angeles, the Government so stipulates.

On the agreed facts, I find that United States value, as that value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that such value is 24.8 cents per pound, net, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 * This matter was determined to be suitable for decision without

oral argument. L.R. 78-230(h).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KERRY ATKINSON, )

) 02:04-cv-2010-GEB-JFM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) ORDER*

)

METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE )

COMPANY, AT&T LONG TERM DISABILITY,)

PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES, )

)

Defendants. )

)

On October 24, 2005, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to

file the Amended Complaint attached to Plaintiff’s motion. Defendants

have not opposed the motion. Since Defendants’ non-opposition is

construed as acquiescence to Plaintiff’s request, it is not necessary

to determine if Plaintiff has satisfied the standards applicable to

her motion. Accordingly, the motion is granted and Plaintiff has

until November 23, 2005, to file and serve the referenced Amended

Complaint.

On the same day that Plaintiff filed her motion for leave to

amend, both Plaintiff and Defendants filed motions for summary

judgment. These motions for summary judgment concern the original

Case 2:04-cv-02010-GEB -JFM Document 47 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

complaint, filed on September 27, 2004. While Plaintiff indicates

that the Amended Complaint only corrects “a technical deficiency” in

the original complaint, “[an] amended complaint supersedes the

original, the latter being treated thereafter as non-existent.” Loux

v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967). The Court is unwilling to

consider and rule on motions directed toward a complaint which will

become “non-existent” when Plaintiff files her Amended Complaint. 

Therefore, the motions for summary judgment filed on October 24, 2005,

will be deemed withdrawn upon the filing of the Amended Complaint. 

To give the parties an opportunity to file amended motions

for summary judgment addressing the Amended Complaint, the Status

(Pretrial Scheduling) Order is amended as follows: The last hearing

date for motions for summary judgment is extended to January 9, 2006,

at 9:00 a.m. The final pretrial conference is re-set for

March 6, 2006, at 2:30 p.m. Trial will remain as set.

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: November 15, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-02010-GEB -JFM Document 47 Filed 11/16/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

Martin L. Jaspovice – SBN 55275

FURTADO, JASPOVICE & SIMONS

A Law Corporation

22274 Main Street

Hayward, California 94541

(510) 582-1080 Telephone

(510) 582-8254 Facsimile

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

LORIE ALMAZAN and ESTHER GALVEZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION

LORIE ALMAZAN and 

ESTHER GALVEZ,

Plaintiffs,

vs.

AZIZURANMAN RAHMANI,; SAYED A.

KARIMI, individually and dba ORANGE CAB

CO.; ORANGE CAB CO.; NATIONAL

RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and

DOES 1 through 20, 

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. 2:04-cv-1872 MCE PAN

ORDER TO SET MANDATORY

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

The stipulation of the parties To Set A Mandatory Settlement Conference Date having been read

and considered, and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that this case is set for a mandatory settlement conference in the

above-entitled court on March 21, 2006 at 02:00 p.m., in Courtroom 3, before the Honorable Morrison

C. England, Jr. Parties shall submit their separate confidential settlement conference statement on or

before March 14, 2006. 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01872-MCE -PAN Document 30 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

The plaintiffs and a representative of defendants* insurance carrier with authority to settle this case are

ordered to appear at said date, time and place with counsel.

Dated: March 6, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01872-MCE -PAN Document 30 Filed 03/06/06 Page 2 of 2
|  |
|--|

|  |
|--|

|  |
|--|

|  |
|--|

|  | **U.S.        Department of Justice****Bureau of Justice Statistics** |  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--|

| **To the BJShome page**
**Publications**
**What's         new****1998 report excluding appendices:****Acrobat         file** (460K) | **Ascii file** (364K)**Appendices 1-5:****Acrobat file**         (302K)  | **Ascii file** (624K)

The "Dissemination         of Sex Offender Registry Data" section of this report has been updated         and is included in ***Summary of State Sex Offender         Registry Dissemination Procedures: Update 1999***.

About         the **National Sex Offender Registry Assistance         Program** (NSOR-AP)

         Help for using BJS products**Return         to the BJS home page|         Go to the top of this page****Bureau       of Justice Statistics      U.S. Department of Justice      www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs      Send comments to askbjs@ojp.usdoj.gov      Page last revised on *August 20, 1999*** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 50454.

#### Protest 111815-K/12702 of Standard Fruit & Steamship Co. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the witness for the plaintiff admitted that the certificate of exportation was not filed within the bonded period or at any time before the liquidation of the entry, as required by the customs regulations. Government counsel moved to dismiss the protest upon the ground that it was not filed in accordance with section 514, pointing out that the entry was liquidated on February 1, 1944, and the protest was not filed until May 23, 1944. Inasmuch as the liquidation here complained about became final and conclusive upon all persons on March 31, 1944, it was held that a protest subsequently filed may not be legally acted upon by this court. The motion to dismiss was therefore granted.
# C_2007161EN.01004401.xml

| 13.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/44

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (Codified version)

COM(2006) 812 final — 2006/0264 (COD)

(2007/C 161/13)

On 17 January 2007 the Council decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 95 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the above-mentioned proposal.

The Section for the Single Market, Production and Consumption, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 7 February 2007. The rapporteur was Mr Grasso.

At its 434th plenary session, held on 14 and 15 March 2007 (meeting of 14 March), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 157 votes with three abstentions.

1.   Conclusions and recommendations

| 1.1 | A codification of rules that have frequently been amended is essential if Community law is to be clear and transparent. |
| --- | --- |

1.1

A codification of rules that have frequently been amended is essential if Community law is to be clear and transparent.

| 1.2 | Codification must be undertaken in full compliance with the normal Community legislative procedure. |
| --- | --- |

1.2

Codification must be undertaken in full compliance with the normal Community legislative procedure.

| 1.3 | The purpose of this proposal is to undertake a codification of Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks. The new Directive will supersede the various acts incorporated in it; this proposal fully preserves the content of the acts being codified and hence does no more than bring them together with only such formal amendments as are required by the codification exercise itself. |
| --- | --- |

1.3

The purpose of this proposal is to undertake a codification of Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks. The new Directive will supersede the various acts incorporated in it; this proposal fully preserves the content of the acts being codified and hence does no more than bring them together with only such formal amendments as are required by the codification exercise itself.

| 1.4 | The Committee endorses this codification. |
| --- | --- |

1.4

The Committee endorses this codification.

Brussels, 14 March 2007.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 

FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTERS 

VISITOR ACCESS REQUEST

Privacy Act Statement:

 

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; the Homeland Security Act, codified in Title 6 of the U.S. Code; 44 U.S.C. 3101; and Executive Order (EO) 9397; EO 12968; and 

Federal Property Regulations, issued July 2002.

Purpose: The purpose for collecting and maintaining this information is to allow individuals access associated with DHS/FLETC facilities and perimeter access 

control, as well as visitor security and management.

Routine Uses: System of Records Notice (SORN) DHS/ALL-024 located at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-02-03/html/2010-2206.htm. 

Disclosure: Disclosure of this information is voluntary. Failure to provide requested information may result in denial of access to the FLETC property.

SECTION A - To be completed by Applicant

1. Applicants Full Name:

(Last, First, Middle)

Aliases Used (nicknames, maiden names, etc):

2. Residential Address: Street Address:

City, State, Zip code:

3. Driver's License: State Driver's License #:

4. Country of Citizenship (List all that apply * ): (* If not a U.S. Citizen, you must complete the DHS Form 11055 or 11059)

5. Dual Citizen: Yes No 6. Place of Birth (City and State): 7. Date of Birth:

8. Gender: Male Female 9. Social Security #: 10. Current PIV/CAC Card: Yes No

11. Contact Information: Home or cell phone number: E-mail

12. Date Completed:

SECTION B - To be Completed by Sponsor (Must be a Federal Employee)

1. Sponsor Name: Agency:

E-mail Address: Office/Cell Number:

2. Type of access requested for Applicant: Graduation Guest Frequent Vendor One Time Vendor PO Staff

5 Day or Less Visitor 5 Day or Less Contractor Frequent Visitor Transporter/CU/FLETC REC 

3. Class Number (if a Graduation Guest):

4. Relationship to Applicant (if a Visitor):

5. Company Name (if a Vendor or a 5 Day or Less CTR):

6. Requested Access Dates: Start Date: Work End Date:

SECTION C - To be Completed by FLETC Security

1. NCIC Check:

No Results Found Results Found

ARN:

FBI Number:

2. Type of Badge to be Issued::

5 Day or Less Contractor

Frequent Vendor

Frequent Visitor

5 Day or Less Visitor

Graduation Guest

One Time Vendor

PO Staff

Transporter/CU/FLETC REC

3. OSPR Decision: Approved Denied

Approved Start Date: Approved Expiration Date:

OSPR Initials: Date:

Notes:

FLETC Form 121-00-02 (4/20) Page 1 of 1
# C_2006149EN.01000401.xml

| 27.6.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 149/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 149/4

---

Final report of the Hearing Officer in case COMP/M.3687 — Johnson&Johnson/Guidant

(pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(pursuant to Articles 15 and 16 of Commission Decision 2001/462/EC, ECSC of 23 May 2001 on the terms of reference of Hearing Officers in certain competition proceedings — OJ L 162, 19.6.2001, p. 21)

(2006/C 149/03)

On 15 March 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (‘the Merger Regulation’) by which the undertaking Johnson & Johnson, USA (‘J&J’) acquires control within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Guidant Corporation, USA(‘Guidant’) by way of purchase of shares

At the end of the first phase of the investigation, the Commission concluded that the concentration raised serious doubts as to its compatibility with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. On 22 April 2005, the Commission therefore initiated proceedings in accordance with Article 6(1)(c) of the Merger Regulation.

A statement of objections was sent to J&J on 20 June 2005. The following day, access to the Commission's file was granted. J&J was asked to reply by 27 June 2005. This deadline was complied with.

The parties did not request the opportunity to develop their arguments in a formal oral hearing.

Edwards Lifesciences SA, Sorin SpA, Abott Laboratories and Medtronic Inc were admitted as interested third parties according to Article 18(4) of the Merger Regulation. They were informed of the nature and subject matter of the case, as appropriate.

On 13 July 2005, J&J offered commitments in order to resolve the competition concerns identified in the Statement of Objections. A market test of the commitments was carried out. I have not been asked to verify the objectivity of the market enquiry. The parties did not request further access to the Commission's file, in particular the results of the market test.

In the light of the commitments proposed and having analysed the results of the market test, the draft decision concludes that the proposed concentration is compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement.

I consider that the rights to be heard of all participants to the present proceeding have been respected.

Brussels, 10 August 2005.

Karen WILLIAMS

---
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4467 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4467

  To reauthorize the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2024

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy 
Reauthorization Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT.

    Section 5 of the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 2019 
(Public Law 116-76; 22 U.S.C. 5701 note) is amended by striking ``7 
years after'' and inserting ``12 years after''.

SEC. 3. SUNSET.

    Section 7(h) of the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act of 
2019 (Public Law 116-76; 22 U.S.C. 5701 note) is amended by striking 
``5 years after'' and inserting ``10 years after''.
                                 <all>
```
*No. 54054.*

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 147535-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2011 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacqueline Winwood, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of June, 2011.


/s/  Jacqueline Winwood
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

June 30, 1943

No. 48486.

#### Protest 890794-G of Louis Marbe Cohn (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the hemp hats in question are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218). The claim was therefore sustained as to those hats.
No. 55236.

#### Anglo Oriental Importing & Rug Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 121095-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated .that the merchandise consists of rugs and carpets exported from Iran between the dates of December 21, 1939, and September 26, 1941, and that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 54056. In accordance with stipulation of counsel, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, converting the currency of the invoices, Iranian rials, to United States dollars at the rate of $0.053475 as to all items, except such as were exported for the benefit of drawback.
```

[112th Congress Public Law 254]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[[Page 126 STAT. 2410]]

Public Law 112-254
112th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   211 Hope Street in Mountain View, California, as the ``Lieutenant 
      Kenneth M. Ballard Memorial Post Office''. <<NOTE: Jan. 10, 
                         2013 -  [H.R. 6260]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. LIEUTENANT KENNETH M. BALLARD MEMORIAL POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 211 Hope Street in Mountain View, California, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lieutenant Kenneth M. Ballard Memorial Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lieutenant 
Kenneth M. Ballard Memorial Post Office''.

    Approved January 10, 2013.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6260:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 158 (2012):
            Dec. 19, 20, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 27, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```