alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Patrick Ronald Holley,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2006 MCE PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

California Department

of Corrections, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner prosecuting this civil rights

action without counsel. 

June 3, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s claims against

the California Department of Corrections and the California

Medical Facility pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, with leave to

amend. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed against

defendants Youngblood, Moreno, D. S. Jones, Davis, R. W.

Williams, M. Veal and K. Aronsen by submitting materials for 

service within 15 days, but the court would construe his election 

Case 2:04-cv-02006-MCE -EFB Document 16 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

so to proceed as consent to dismissal of his claims against the

California Department of Corrections and the California Medical

Facility without leave to amend. 

June 14, 2005, plaintiff submitted materials for service of

defendants Youngblood, Moreno, D. S. Jones, Davis, R. W.

Williams, M. Veal and K. Aronsen. I find plaintiff has consented

to dismissal of claims against the California Department of

Corrections and the California Medical Facility without leave to

amend. 

Accordingly, the court hereby recommends that claims against

the California Department of Corrections and the California

Medical Facility be dismissed without prejudice. 

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: June 21, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02006-MCE -EFB Document 16 Filed 06/21/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK HUNGERFORD, No. CIV S-04-1455-LKK-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

HEROUX, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s second motion for an extension of

time (Doc. 29), filed on January 5, 2006. 

On November 10, 2005, the court issued findings and recommendations and

provided for objections to be filed within ten days of the date of service thereof. On November

29, 2005, the court granted plaintiff a 45-day extension on that deadline. Plaintiff now seeks an

additional 30-day extension. Good cause appearing therefor, the request will be granted. 

Plaintiff is reminded that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right

to appeal any order adopting the findings and recommendations. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d

1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

Case 2:04-cv-01455-LKK -CMK Document 30 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Within 30 days after being served with this order, any party may file

written objections with the court, such document to be captioned “Objections to Magistrate

Judge's Findings and Recommendations.”

DATED: January 11, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01455-LKK -CMK Document 30 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 17

- 00609

- CV

Marta ARREDONDO

, Appellant

v.

TECHSERV CONSULTING AND TRAINING, LTD. , T&D Solutions, LLC, and AEP Texas Central Company, Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Brooks County, Texas Trial Court No. 15

- 08

- 16922

- CV Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order granting appellee T&D Solutions, LLC’s traditional and no

- evidence motions for summary judgment is AFFIRMED as to the claims for negligence per se and gross negligence and REVERSED as to appellant’s negligence claim, and that claim is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings. The trial court’s order granting appellee AEP Texas Central Company’s motions for traditional and no

evidence summary judgment is REVERSED, and appellant’s claims against appellee AEP Texas Central C ompany for negligence, negligence per se, and gross negligence are REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings. The trial court’s order granting Techserv Consulting and Training, LTD.’s traditional and no

- evidence motions for summary judgment is AF FIRMED. Costs of this appeal are taxed against the party incurring the same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 43.4.

SIGNED September 26, 2018.

_____________________________ Irene Rios, Justice
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WORDTECH SYSTEMS INC., a California

corporation,

Plaintiff,

v.

INTEGRATED NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC.,

et al,

Defendants.

CIV S-04-1971 MCE PAN (JFM)

ORDER 

Plaintiff’s motions to compel discovery and for sanctions, filed March 2, 2006

and noticed for hearing on April 13, 2006, are outside the March 20, 2006 discovery deadline set

by the District Judge. Accordingly, the hearings on these matters are dropped from calendar. 

DATED: April 12, 2006.

006:word1971.ord

Case 2:04-cv-01971-TLN-EFB Document 82 Filed 04/12/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4075]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending February 23, 2007

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier
    Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the 
Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 
301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or 
Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. 
Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by 
expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a 
show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final 
order without further proceedings.

    Docket Number: OST-2005-21348.
    Date Filed: February 22, 2007.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 15, 2007.
    Description: Application of Gulfstream Air Charter, Inc. requesting 
the Department approve a change in its name from ``Gulfstream Air 
Charter, Inc.'' to ``Gulfstream Connection, Inc.'', and that the 
Department reissue the commuter air carrier authorization issued on 
February 17, 2006.

    Docket Number: OST-2007-27416.
    Date Filed: February 22, 2007.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: March 15, 2007.
    Description: Application of Aerolineas Galapagos AeroGal, S.A. 
requesting an exemption and a foreign air carrier permit, authorizing 
it to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, 
property and mail between a point or points in Ecuador and the co-
terminal points Miami and New York.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. E7-4075 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TUVALU TUTNILA F.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1724 DFL KJM P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 23, 2004, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying

appointment of counsel and dismissing the complaint with leave to amend some claims, but

without leave to amend others. The order also directed plaintiff to limit his amended complaint

to twenty pages. On January 13, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld

unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, including the

motion for reconsideration, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s

ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 ////

////

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 32 Filed 09/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed December 23, 2004, is affirmed. 

DATED: 9/9/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 32 Filed 09/13/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Timothy G. Healy, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof EnerNOC, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SECtransition instructions contained in SEC Release No. 34-54942];

 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

Date: August 13, 2008

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Timothy G. Healy     |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |   | Timothy G. Healy              |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer       |
|   |   | (principal executive officer) |

 

----
No. 53525.

protests 139638-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Raphael Weill & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Before the Third Division,

June 24, 1940

No. 44012.

#### Protest 999361-G of Amtorg Trading Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The protest was submitted without evidence in support of the claims made. On the record presented it was overruled.
No. 50040.

#### Protests 937969-G, etc., of Olivier Straw Goods Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson; J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of (1) racello hats the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 47291; (2) hemp hats similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab,*30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218; and (3) hemp hats similar to those involved in Abstract 46497, which records were admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the items of merchandise in question were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
# EUR-Lex - 52007BP0113(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007BP0113(01)

**1. European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2005 (C6-0386/2006 - 2006/2153(DEC)) **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0183 - 0184 *

1.

European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2005 (C6-0386/2006 — 2006/2153(DEC))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2005 [1],

- having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the financial year 2005, together with the Centre's replies [2],

- having regard to the Council's recommendation of 27 February 2007 (5711/2007 — C6-0080/2007),

- having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [3], and in particular Article 185 thereof,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing a European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training [4], and in particular Article 12a thereof,

- having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [5], and in particular, Article 94 thereof,

- having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Employment and Social Affairs (A6-0097/2007),

1. Grants to the director of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training discharge for the implementation of the Centre's budget for the financial year 2005;

2. Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the director of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

[1] OJ C 266, 31.10.2006, p. 28.

[2] OJ C 312, 19.12.2006, p. 60.

[3] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

[4] OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 2051/2004 (OJ L 355, 1.12.2004, p. 1).

[5] OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

--------------------------------------------------
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 28, 2017

Order 

Clerk

July 28, 2017

155380(44)

KERRI HUNTER OTTO, Next Friend of 

BAILEY ANN MARIE NOBLE, Minor, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 155380

v COA: 330214

Benzie CC: 14-009969-NO

INN AT WATERVALE, INC., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Heart of the Lakes Center for 

Land Conservation Policy to file a brief amicus curiae in support of the application for 

leave to appeal is GRANTED. The amicus brief will be accepted for filing if submitted 

on or before August 18, 2017.
### SERVE D MARC H 7 , 201 1 • v.^ORTATlO N • ' - "PUPATION S

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OPT^IC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C IN TH E MATTE RO F 

### SAMUELJOSEP H LATHA M FA A DOCKE T No . CP10WP000 9 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) DMS No . FAA-2010-0624 ORDE RO FDISMISSA L O n Jul y 21 , 2010 , th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (hereinafte r referre dt o a s "Complainant" ) file daComplaint . O n Jul y 14 , 2010 , Responden t Samue l Josep h Latha m(hereinafte r

"Respondent" ) ha drequeste dahearing . O n Marc h3 , 2011 , Complainan t

withdre w it s Complaint , citin g settlement . 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.21 5 states : "A t an y tim e befor e o r

durin g ahearing , a

n agenc y attorne y ma y withdra w acomplain t o r part y ma y withdra w areques t for ahearin g withou t th e consen t

o f th e administrativ e la w judge . I f an agenc y attorne y withdraw s th e complain t

o r aparty withdraw s th e reques t for ahearin g an dth e answer , th e administrativ e la w judg e shal l dismis s th e proceeding s unde r this subpar t withprejudice. " WHEREFORE , th e withi n file dWithdrawa l o f Complain t

havin g bee n rea dan d considered , i t

i s ORDERE D a s follows :p 1 . Complainant' s Withdrawa l of Complain t

b e an di s hereb y granted ; an d 

# i ^ 1 2 . Thi s proceedin g b e an di s hereb y dismisse dwithprejudice .

M S O ORDERED .

Richar dC . Goodwi n U.S . Administrativ e Law Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No . CP10WP000 9 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Samue l Josep hLatham , Responden t 3369 0 Almon dSt . Wildomar , C A 9259 5 TEL : 951-392-489 7 Lierr e Green , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP- 7 Federal Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 7 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mE12-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

^ Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address ; Hearin g Docket , Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S . W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m 2014 , Washington

, D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6467

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus BASHAWN LEE HANBERRY, a/k/a BO, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-94-185, CA-99-13) Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bashawn Lee Hanberry, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on March 6, 2000, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on March 7, 2000. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: Bashawn Lee Hanberry seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hanberry, Nos. CR-94-185; CA-99-13 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2000). * We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED