alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      31.2





CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




I,
      John
      Chen, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of General Steel Holdings, Inc.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:




(a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
      relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this quarterly report is being prepared;




(b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by
      this report based on such evaluation;




(c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):





(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.


Date:
                February 12, 2007/s/
                John ChenBy:
                John Chen
                Title:
                  Director and Chief Financial
                  Officer
Appendix C: Study Questions

	Management of Acne – AHCPR Evidence Report

	Study QuestionsManagement of Acne – AHCPR Evidence Report

	Study Questions

Question 1

What is the effect on  of in with 

acne, and with   , who are treated by ?

Question 2

What are the 

of acne and its sequelae in a population?
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. (the  "Partnership")
for the  period  ended  June 29, 2007 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Kathleen Skero,
Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ GARY CARLIN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Gary Carlin *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: August 10, 2007
_____________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
No. 47854.

#### Protests 30615-K, etc., of A. Eckstein & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the racello hats or hoods are not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, and not blocked or trimmed, the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 47291, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4483 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4483

   To extend, and repeal the waiver authority under, the Protecting 
                 Europe's Energy Security Act of 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2024

    Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Cotton, and Mr. Risch) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To extend, and repeal the waiver authority under, the Protecting 
                 Europe's Energy Security Act of 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Securing Europe's Energy Security 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF, AND REPEAL OF WAIVER UNDER, PROTECTING EUROPE'S 
              ENERGY SECURITY ACT OF 2019.

    Section 7503 of the Protecting Europe's Energy Security Act of 2019 
(title LXXV of Public Law 116-92; 22 U.S.C. 9526 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (f); and
            (2) in subsection (h)(2), by striking ``the date that is'' 
        and all that follows and inserting ``January 1, 2031.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN MONTUE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1697 FCD JFM P

vs.

MIKE KNOWLES, et al., 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an application for a

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges a March 13, 2002

decision of a panel of the California Board of Prison Terms (Board) to deny him a parole date. 

This matter is before the court on respondents’ motion to dismiss.

Respondents contend that petitioner has no federally protected liberty interest in

parole under California law and, therefore, that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. To

support that contention, respondents rely on an order of the district court in Sass v. California

Board of Prison Terms, 376 F.Supp.2d 975 (E.D.Cal. 2005). The Sass case is set for oral

argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on March 16, 2006. Good

cause appearing, respondents’ motion will be denied without prejudice to its renewal, as

appropriate, not later than thirty days after any decision by the court of appeals in Sass. 

Case 2:04-cv-01697-FCD-JFM Document 42 Filed 02/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondents’

August 9, 2005 motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice.

DATED: February 21, 2006. 

12

mont1697.dmtd

Case 2:04-cv-01697-FCD-JFM Document 42 Filed 02/21/06 Page 2 of 2
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 8 -00 732 -CV In re Austin Ind ependent School District ORIG IN A L PR OC E E D IN GFR OM T R A V IS C OU N T Y M E M O R

A N D UM O P I N I O N The Austin Independe nt School District’s petit ion for writ of mandamus is denied. We vacate the Court’s Nove mber 26, 2008 stay order .

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pember ton and Waldrop Filed: F ebrua

ry 12, 2009
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Airman JOSHUA B. COLLYMORE

United States Air Force

ACM S32222

29 December 2014

Sentence adjudged 31 January 2014 by SP CM convened at Cannon Air

Force Base

, New Mexico . Military Judge: Christopher M. Schumann

(sitting alone).

Approved S entence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 7 months

, and reduction to E

- 1

.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Captain Melissa Biedermann

.

Appellate Counsel for the United S tates: Lieutenant Colonel Katherine E.

Oler.

Before

MITCHELL, WEBER, and BENNETT

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent

under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4

.



### PER CURIAM :

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occ urred. * 

### Article 66(c),

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed , 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2 000).

 The Court notes that the Court

- Martial Order (CMO), dated 14 March 2014 incorrectly omits the minor changes

(pen & ink changes) to Specification 2 of Charge II and lists the incorrect dates for Specification 2 of Charge IV.

The Court orders the p romulgation of a corrected CMO.ACM S32222 2 

### Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
CASE DIGEST: U.S. DOJ, Fed. BOP, Fed. Corr. Complex, Victorville, Cal., 

73 FLRA 835 (2024)

The Arbitrator issued an award finding the Agency denied overtime opportunities 

to a correctional officer on a continuous and ongoing basis. The Agency filed exceptions 

to the award on nonfact and exceeded-authority grounds. Because the Agency did not 

demonstrate that the award was deficient on either ground, the Authority denied the 

exceptions.

This case digest is a summary of a decision issued by the Federal Labor Relations 

Authority, with a short description of the issues and facts of the case. Descriptions 

contained in this case digest are for informational purposes only, do not constitute legal 

precedent, and are not intended to be a substitute for the opinion of the Authority.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J A ME S A R T H U R MU L G R E W, P e titio n e r- A p p e llan t, v. M . M c D O N A L D , W ar de n, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 17737 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 9 - c v - 0 0 7 6 7 - M CE ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia M orr i s on C . E ngl and, J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d Jul y17, 2012 ** B e f o r e : S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS I L V E R M A N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . C al i forni a s t at e pri soner J am es A rthu r M ul grew appeal s f rom the di stri ct c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t d is m is s in g h is 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 h ab e a s p e titio n a s u n tim e ly . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n dw e a f f i rm. M ul grew cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d i n d i sm i ss i ng hi s pet i t i on as 

# FI LED JU L 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 17737 2 unt i m e l y . W e ne e d notde c i de w he the rM ul gr e w w a s e nt i t l e d t o anyf orm of to llin g to r e n d e rh is p e titio n tim e lyb e c au s e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt la c k e dju r is d ic tio n to c o n s id e rth e p e titio n . See 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4(a) ; B a ile yv . Hill , 599 F . 3d 976, 982 (9 th C ir. 2 0 1 0 ) ( “§ 2 2 5 4 (a ) d o es n o t co n fe r ju risd icti o n o v era s tate p riso n er ’s i n-cust od y c hal l enge t o a re st i tut i on order i m po se d as partof a c ri m i nal se nt ence ”) ; W a sh i n g to n v. L a m

p ert , 42 2 F . 3d 86 4, 86 9 (9th C i r. 20 05 ) ( re vi ew i ng courtm ay a f f irm o n a n yg r o u n ds up p o rte db yth e r e c o r d ) . AF F I RME D.
(Reap. Dec. 10065)

#### BARNES HIND LABORATORIES, INC. *V.*UNITED STATES

Entry No. 15352.

(Decided August 17, 1961)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*William S. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court:

> That the merchandise the subject of the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement, limited to the item stated below, is properly dutiable on the basis of American Selling Price as defined in Section 402(g), Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

> That the said American Selling Price as defined in Section 402(g), Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, was as follows for the export period indicated.

> Item Export period Price

> Amino Salicylic Acid 1958 $3.40 per lb. less 1% net packed

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question, and that such value for the involved item at the time of exportation was $3.40 per pound, less 1 per centum, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 10.3

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                       TO
                         CURATIVE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.
                     NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTION PLAN

      The Company's Board of Directors has adopted, subject to shareholder
approval, amendments to the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the
"Director Plan") which provide that

      (a) the initial and annual option grants made to non-employee directors
      under the Director Plan upon their re-election to the Board of Directors
      be increased from 12,000 shares to 15,000 shares,

      (b) the initial and annual option grants described in clause (a) above be
      immediately fully vested and exercisable,

      (c) the non-employee directors elected at the Company's 2002 Annual
      Meeting shall each be granted an option for 45,000 shares under the
      Director Plan upon their re-election, which option shall be exercisable
      immediately as to one third of the shares, and shall become exercisable as
      to another third of the shares on the first anniversary of its grant and
      as to the final third on the second anniversary of its grant,

      (d) the option granted pursuant to clause (c) above shall become fully
      vested and exercisable in the event of a change in control of the Company
      in accordance with the terms of the Director Plan, and

      (e) any non-employee director that is granted an option pursuant to clause
      (c) above shall not be eligible to receive an annual option grant
      otherwise due under the Director Plan upon re-election to the Board of
      Director at the Company's 2002 Annual Meeting or at the annual shareholder
      meetings to be held in 2003 and 2004.

Dated April 25, 2002
Approved by Shareholders May 30, 2002
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

Nos. 06-18-00025-CR &

 06-18-00026-CR

BRADLEY CURTIS KOUGHER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 8th District Court

Hopkins County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 1726304 & 1726305

Before Morriss, C.J., Burgess and Stevens, JJ.
2

O R D E R

Court reporter Jana Atchison Rushing recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate 

cause numbers 06-18-00025-CR and 06-18-00026-CR, styled Bradley Curtis Kougher v. The State 

of Texas, trial court cause numbers 1726304 and 1726305, respectively, in the 8th Judicial District 

Court of Hopkins County, Texas. A copy of this record has been requested by a family member 

of Bradley Curtis Kougher.

After receiving that request, we asked Rushing if she would voluntarily redact the sensitive 

data from the record before we were faced with the prospect of disclosing an unredacted copy of 

the reporter’s record. Rushing has respectfully declined to redact the sensitive data, on a voluntary 

basis. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10. Sensitive data includes,

(1) A driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax 

identification number or similar government-issued personal identification number;

(2) bank account number, credit card number, and other financial account 

number;

(3) a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor 

at the time the offense was committed.

TEX. R. APP. 9.10(a). Rule 9.10(b) provides that, “[u]nless a court orders otherwise, an electronic 

or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive 

data.” Further, “[t]he filing of a document constitutes a certification by the filer that the document 

complies with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this rule.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(e). 
3

Having determined that volumes 1 and 3 through 9 of the reporter’s record contain sensitive 

data, as that term is defined by Rule 9.10, we hereby ORDER Rushing to redact from these 

volumes any and all sensitive data they contain.1

Those volumes of the so redacted reporter’s record are to be received by this Court no later 

than Thursday, August 8, 2019. If any of such redacted volumes are not received by August 8, we 

warn Rushing that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she 

should not be held in contempt of this Court for failing to obey its order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT

Date: July 16, 2019

 1

These volumes contain the names of five persons who were minors when the offense was committed. See TEX. R.

APP. 9.10(a)(3). In accordance with Rule 9.10(d), “Sensitive data must be redacted by using the letter ‘X’ in place of 

each omitted digit or character or by removing the sensitive data in a manner indicating that the data has been 

redacted.” TEX. R. APP. P. 9.10(d).
Case 2:04-cv-01339-MCE-AC   Document 46   Filed 10/21/05   Page 1 of 4

Case 2:04-cv-01339-MCE-AC   Document 46   Filed 10/21/05   Page 2 of 4

Case 2:04-cv-01339-MCE-AC   Document 46   Filed 10/21/05   Page 3 of 4

Case 2:04-cv-01339-MCE-AC   Document 46   Filed 10/21/05   Page 4 of 4

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2017-03-16T12:09:48-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2004, of El Paso Production Holding Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Lisa A. Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify (i) that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ Lisa A. Stewart
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lisa A. Stewart
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)

                                        November 19, 2004








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Production Holding Company and will be retained by El Paso
Production Holding Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
REED

S

MIT

H LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

– 1 – DOCSOAK-9791697.1-ECHERN 9/26/05 3:38 PM

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Robert D. Phillips, Jr. (SBN 82639) 

Eugenia S. Chern (SBN 215092) 

REED SMITH LLP

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2400 

Oakland, CA 94612-3572 

Mailing Address:

P.O. Box 2084 

Oakland, CA 94604-2084 

Telephone: 510.763.2000 

Facsimile: 510.273.8832 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Minnesota Life Insurance Company, 

erroneously sued as Minnesota Mutual Life 

Insurance Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALLEN WALL, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant. 

Case No. CIV.S-04-1314 WBS DAD 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Case 2:04-cv-01314-WBS-DAD Document 32 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 2
REED

S

MIT

H LLP

A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

– 2 – DOCSOAK-9791697.1-ECHERN 9/26/05 3:38 PM

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Allen Wall and defendant 

Minnesota Life Insurance Company, erroneously sued as Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance 

Company, through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action be and hereby is 

dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41 (a)(1). 

The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorney fees. 

DATED: September 14, 2005. 

By /s/ James L. Bianchi 

James L. Bianchi 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Allen Wall 

DATED: September 23, 2005. 

REED SMITH LLP

By /s/ Eugenia S. Chern 

Eugenia S. Chern 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Minnesota Life Insurance Company, erroneously 

sued as Minnesota Mutual Life Insurance Company 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 26, 2005 

Case 2:04-cv-01314-WBS-DAD Document 32 Filed 09/27/05 Page 2 of 2