alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30241 Conference Calendar

JOSEPH BENNETT, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; RICHARD P. IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana, Respondents-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-2166-L

- - - - - - - - - - October 21, 1998 Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and WIENER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joseph Bennett, Louisiana prisoner # 122501, was convicted by a jury of second degree murder. Bennett appeals the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The district court granted Bennett’s request for a certificate of appealability (COA). His request for a COA is construed as a notice of appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his habeas petition. See Stevens v. Heard , 674 F.2d 320, 323 (5th Cir. 1982).No. 98-30241 -2- Bennett challenges the state trial and appellate courts’ determinations that Brandy Ferdinand’s testimony regarding her five-year-old sister Irma Ferdinand’s statements about their mother’s death constituted an exception to hearsay. Federal habeas courts do not reexamine state-court determinations of questions of state law, and this court is limited to deciding whether a conviction violated the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States. Estelle v. McGuire , 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991). By not briefing the Confrontation Clause issue raised in the district court, Bennett has abandoned the issue on appeal.
See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). Bennett does not raise an issue cognizable for habeas review. His appeal is DISMISSED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GYPSIE JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

SAFEWAY, INC.; VONS COMPANIES.

INC., et al.,

Defendant.

 

Case No. CIV.S.04-1881 FCD CMK

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Order

It is HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of the plaintiff, USDC Case No.

CIV.S. 04-1881 FCD CMK, is hereby dismised with prejudice.

DATED: April 25, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01881-FCD-CMK Document 13 Filed 04/25/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23(b), Form 10-K
                                                       Kansas City Life
                                                       Insurance Company




                       Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  2-97351)  pertaining to the Savings and Investment  Plan of Kansas City
Life Insurance Company of our report dated February 27, 1998 with respect to the
financial  statements  and schedules of the Kansas City Life  Insurance  Company
Savings and  Investment  Plan included in this Annual Report (Form 11-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1997.



                                                /s/  Ernst & Young LLP





Kansas City, Missouri
March 23, 1998
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-2178

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus S. RANDOLPH SENGEL; DIETRA Y. TRENT; MARK R. WARNER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-1-JCC) Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 14, 2004 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, O’CONNEL, O’CONNELL & SARSFIELD, Rockville, Maryland; Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We agree with the district court that Sindram has a history of filing vexatious and frivolous cases, many of which resulted in meritless appeals. If Sindram continues this conduct, which waste judicial resources, this court will consider ordering sanctions and a pre-filing injunction. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael J. Sindram appeals a district court order denying his motion for reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b). We have reviewed the district court’s order and the record and find the appeal frivolous. Sindram failed to allege any proper grounds for reconsideration. Moreover, on appeal, he failed to specifically challenge the district court’s findings in this regard. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous. *We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Nancy J. McGurk                                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Nancy                J. McGurk                                         |
| Title: | Chief                Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | August                14, 2006                                         |
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4354 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

107 North Hoyne Avenue in Fritch, Texas, as the ‘‘Chief Zeb Smith 

Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2024 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 107 North Hoyne Avenue in Fritch, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Chief Zeb Smith Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CHIEF ZEB SMITH POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 107 North Hoyne Avenue in 

6 Fritch, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Chief Zeb Smith Post Office’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4354 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Chief Zeb Smith Post 

3 Office’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CONCRETE WASHOUT SYSTEMS, INC., No. CIV.S-04-1005 WBS DAD 

a California corporation,

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

MINEGAR ENVIRONMENTAL

SYSTEMS, INC., a California

corporation, PETER J. MINEGAR,

Defendants.

______________________________/

This matter came before the court on May 6, 2005, for

hearing on plaintiff Concrete Washout Systems, Inc.’s motion to

compel further deposition testimony. Michael Chase appeared on

behalf of plaintiff. Erick C. Howard appeared on behalf of

defendants.

Having considered all written materials submitted in

connection with the motion, and after hearing oral argument, for the

reasons set forth on the record during the hearing, IT IS HEREBY

Case 2:04-cv-01005-WBS-DAD Document 59 Filed 05/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to compel is granted in part and

denied in part. The parties’ requests for sanctions are denied.

DATED: May 13, 2005.

DAD:th

ddad1\orders.civil\concrete1005.oah2

Case 2:04-cv-01005-WBS-DAD Document 59 Filed 05/13/05 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:Ten-year check-up [electronic resource]: have federal agencies responded tocivil rights recommendations?**
 
Volumes: 01 | 02 | 03| 04
 
SuDoc Number:CR 1.2:T 25/2/V.1-
Item Number:0288-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:000572053
 
October 17, 2018
INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No.DA 21-0326 STATE OF MONTANA, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TIMOTHY JOHNSON, Defendant and Appellant.

FiL. FEB
0 9 2023 Bowen Greenwood Glerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana ORDER Pursuant

to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the Appellant

is given anextension

of time until March 10, 2023, to prepare,file, and servethe Appellant's reply brief. No further extensions will be granted. DATED this 9th day of February, 2023. Forthe Court, B3

/• Chief Justice02/09/2023Case Number: DA 21-0326
No. 58003.

protests 188415-K, etc. (Boston).

#### John A. Conkey & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
## ----------- 

## 8 o CO LO ---or­ d:, LO (\J N ,­ (\J LL LO CO LO CJ) d:, LO (\J N ,­ (\J 1-- March 11, 2010 CJ)

,­ The Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
Dear Secretary'LaHood: On behalfKintetsu International, I am writing to express our strong support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Seattle and Haneda. Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for ourregion, where many corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. The growth ofour business ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Our business travelers lookto the convenience offlying intoTokyo's downtown Haneda airport.Seattle.is 

### a proven and successful gateway to Asia. This summerDelta is adding new service to Beijing and Osaka, building SEA-TAC into an important West Coast gateway. The addition ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our business travelers. Thank you for consideration ofthis request.

Frank Lee Presi,dent
. Kintets-qInternatioIlal
.... 

# Go Anywhere wwwkintetsu.com Chicago Cincinnati Los Angeles New Jersey New York San Jose
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEON WILSON CROCKETT, No. CIV S-04-1489-FCD-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

JACK SUTER, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On October 17, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. 

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01489-FCD-CMK Document 16 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 17, 2005, are adopted in

full;

2. This action is dismissed; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.

DATED:November 7, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01489-FCD-CMK Document 16 Filed 11/08/05 Page 2 of 2
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No.  2-90929),  (No.  33-41295),  (No.  33-54027),  (No.
333-14067),  (No. 333-08725),  (No. 333-08727), (No. 33-58981), (No. 333-14069),
(No. 333-14071),  (No. 333-22109) and (No. 333-08723) of Kaneb Services, Inc. of
our report dated February 19, 1998 appearing on page F-1 of this Form 10-K.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 23, 1998
Before the Second Division,

August 8, 1950

No. 54590.

#### F. E. Macartney v. United States,

petition 6614-R (Duluth).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From an examination of the record the court was satisfied that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 52597.

protests 47342-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### Lippincott, Johnson & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




I,
      Zuo
      Sheng Yu, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of General Steel Holdings, Inc.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:




(a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
      relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this quarterly report is being prepared;




(b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by
      this report based on such evaluation;




(c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.









Date:
        February 12, 2007


/s/
                Zuo Sheng YuBy:
                Zuo Sheng YuTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer and
                President
Exhibit 31(a), Form 10-K
                                           Kansas City Life Insurance Company

KANSAS CITY
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSECTION 906 CERTIFICATION



                                                            Year Ended 2003

The undersigned certify
that the registrants Form 10-K report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the registrant.

/s/R. Philip Bixby
R. Philip Bixby
President, Chief Executive Officer,
and Vice Chairman of the Board/s/Tracy W. Knapp
Tracy W. Knapp
Senior Vice President, Finance

Date: March 11, 2004
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4272 

To direct the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library to obtain a 

statue of Shirley Chisholm for placement in the United States Capitol. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 7, 2024 

Mr. WARNOCK (for himself, Ms. BUTLER, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Ms. WARREN, 

Ms. HIRONO, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. SMITH, Mrs. MURRAY, 

Ms. STABENOW, Mr. CASEY, Mr. PADILLA, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To direct the Joint Committee of Congress on the Library 

to obtain a statue of Shirley Chisholm for placement 

in the United States Capitol. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Shirley Chisholm Stat5 ue Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4272 IS

1 SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF STATUE OF SHIRLEY CHISHOLM IN 

2 UNITED STATES CAPITOL. 

3 (a) OBTAINING STATUE.—Not later than 2 years 

4 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Joint Com5 mittee of Congress on the Library shall enter into an 

6 agreement to obtain a statue of Shirley Chisholm, under 

7 such terms and conditions as the Joint Committee con8 siders appropriate consistent with applicable law. The 

9 Joint Committee may authorize the Architect of the Cap10 itol to enter into the agreement and related contracts re11 quired under this subsection on its behalf, under such 

12 terms and conditions as the Joint Committee may require. 

13 (b) PLACEMENT.—The Joint Committee of Congress 

14 on the Library shall place the statue obtained under sub15 section (a) in a permanent public location in the United 

16 States Capitol. 

17 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

18 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

19 necessary to carry out this Act, and any amounts so ap20 propriated shall remain available until expended. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 21





SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT





The following list sets forth subsidiaries of Katy Industries, Inc. as of March 25, 2010, as well as operating divisions of such subsidiaries, with successive indentation indicating parent/subsidiary relationships of such subsidiaries.  The state of jurisdiction or incorporation of each such subsidiary is stated in parentheses.  All such subsidiaries are 100% owned, directly or indirectly, by Katy Industries, Inc.  Omitted subsidiaries do not, in the aggregate, constitute a “significant subsidiary”.





American Gage & Machine Company (Illinois)


WP Liquidating Corp. (Illinois)


Ashford Holding Corp. (Delaware)


Continental Commercial Products, LLC (Delaware)


Continental (division)


Contico (division)


Container (division)


Disco (division)


Gemtex (division)


Glit (division)


Wilen (division)


CEH Limited (U.K.)


GCW, Inc. (Delaware)


HPMI, Inc. (Delaware)


Hermann Lowenstein, Inc. (Delaware)


Katy International, Inc. (British Virgin Islands)


Katy Teweh Inc. (Delaware)


Wabash Holding Corp. (Delaware)


W.J. Smith Wood Preserving Company (Texas)


WII, Inc. (Delaware)


TTI Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)


2155735 Ontario, Inc. (Canada)


Glit/Gemtex, Ltd. (Canada)


Gemtex Canada (Division)


KMG Canada (Division)