9730 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Notices 

1Contrary to the ITC’s statement that the order on 

furfuryl alcohol from Thailand remains in place, the 

Department’s sunset determination in this 

proceeding will, in fact, result in the order being 

revoked. See ITC News Release 06-093 (September 

1, 2006) concerning Inv. Nos. 731-TA-703 and 705 

(Second Review). 

section 751(c) of the Act. See Furfuryl 

Alcohol from Thailand; Preliminary 

Results of the Second Sunset Review of 

the Antidumping Duty Order, 71 FR 

62583 (October 26, 2006) (‘‘Preliminary 

Results’’). 

The Department conducted a 

verification of the data provided by 

Indorama Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd. 

(‘‘Indorama’’) on December 19 and 20, 

2006. The verification report was issued 

on January 3, 2007. 

We provided interested parties an 

opportunity to comment on our 

preliminary results. The Department 

received a case brief from Penn 

Specialty Chemicals, Inc. (‘‘Penn’’) on 

January 16, 2007, and a rebuttal brief 

from Indorama on January 22, 2007. A 

hearing was not held because none was 

requested. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by this 

order is furfuryl alcohol 

(C4H3OCH2OH). Furfuryl alcohol is a 

primary alcohol, and is colorless or pale 

yellow in appearance. It is used in the 

manufacture of resins and as a wetting 

agent and solvent for coating resins, 

nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, and 

other soluble dyes. The product subject 

to this order is classifiable under 

subheading 2932.13.00 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the 

HTSUS subheading is provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, our 

written description of the scope of this 

proceeding is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this sunset review 

are addressed in the ‘‘Issues and 

Decision Memorandum for the Second 

Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Furfuryl Alcohol from 

Thailand; Final Results,’’ to David M. 

Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration, dated February 27, 

2007 (‘‘Decision Memo’’), which is 

hereby adopted by this notice. The 

issues discussed in the Decision Memo 

include the likelihood of continuation 

or recurrence of dumping and the 

magnitude of the margin likely to 

prevail if the antidumping duty order 

were revoked. Parties can find a 

complete discussion of all issues raised 

in this sunset review and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memorandum, which is on file in 

room B–099 of the main Department 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the Decision Memo can be 

accessed directly on the Web at http:// 

ia.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. The paper 

copy and electronic version of the 

Decision Memo are identical in content. 

Final Results of Review and Revocation 

The Department determines that 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand 

is not likely to lead to a continuation or 

recurrence of dumping. Consequently, 

the Department is revoking the 

antidumping duty order on furfuryl 

alcohol from Thailand, pursuant to 

section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.222(i)(1)(ii). Consistent with 19 CFR 

351.222(i)(2)(i) and section 

751(c)(6)(A)(iii) of the Act, this 

revocation will be effective May 4, 2006, 

the fifth anniversary of the date of 

publication in the Federal Register of 

the notice of continuation. See Notice of 

Continuation of Antidumping Duty 

Orders: Furfuryl Alcohol from the 

People’s Republic of China and 

Thailand, 66 FR 22519 (May 4, 2001). 

We will notify the U.S. International 

Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) of our final 

results. We do not intend, however, to 

report a rate to the ITC as a 

determination by the Department that 

revocation of the order would not lead 

to a continuation or recurrence of 

dumping will result in revocation of the 

order.1 Moreover, the ITC has already 

ruled in this proceeding. 

The Department will instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection to 

liquidate without regard to dumping 

duties entries of the subject 

merchandise entered or withdrawn from 

warehouse for consumption on or after 

May 4, 2006, (the effective date), and to 

discontinue collection of cash deposits 

of antidumping duties. 

This sunset review and notice are in 

accordance with sections 751(c), 752, 

and 777(i)(1) of the Act. This notice 

serves as a final reminder to parties 

subject to administrative protective 

order (‘‘APO’’) of their responsibility 

concerning the disposition of 

proprietary material disclosed under 

APO in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.305. Timely notification of return/ 

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Dated: February 27, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–3792 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–588–837] 

Large Newspaper Printing Presses and 

Components Thereof, Whether 

Assembled or Unassembled, from 

Japan: Discontinuation of 

Reconsideration of Sunset Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 24, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Goldberger, Kate Johnson, or 

Rebecca Trainor, AD/CVD Operations, 

Import Administration, International 

Trade Administration, U.S. Department 

of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: 202–482–4136, 202–482–

4929, or 202–482–4007, respectively. 

Discontinuation of Reconsideration of 

Sunset Review 

On April 13, 2006, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) published 

the notice of initiation notice of the 

reconsideration of the sunset review of 

the antidumping duty order on large 

newspaper printing presses and 

components thereof, whether assembled 

or unassembled (LNPP), from Japan. See 

Large Newspaper Printing Presses and 

Components Thereof, Whether 

Assembled or Unassembled, From 

Japan: Reconsideration of Sunset 

Review, 71 FR 19164 (April 13, 2006). 

This review was initiated to reconsider 

the sunset review of the antidumping 

duty order on LNPP from Japan, which 

resulted in the revocation of that 

antidumping duty order. See, Large 

Newspaper Printing Presses and 

Components Thereof, Whether 

Assembled or Unassembled, from Japan 

(A–588–837) and Germany (A–428–821): 

Notice of Final Results of Five-year 

Sunset Reviews and Revocation of 

Antidumping Duty Orders, 67 FR 8522 

(February 25, 2002). The Department 

published its preliminary results in the 

reconsideration of sunset review on 

November 6, 2006. See Large 

Newspaper Printing Presses and 

Components Thereof, Whether 

Assembled or Unassembled, from Japan: 

Preliminary Results of Reconsideration 

of Sunset Review, 71 FR 64927 

(November 6, 2006). 

On January 24, 2007, the Court of 

International Trade (CIT) issued its 

decision in Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, 

Ltd. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 

06–00078, Slip. Op. 07–12 (January 24, 

2007), and ordered the Department to 


erjones on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 42 / Monday, March 5, 2007 / Notices 9731 

1Although Mueller submitted its withdrawal of 

its request for review before the Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Requests for 

Revocation in Part, 72 FR 5005 (February 2, 2007) 

(‘‘Initiation Notice’’), published in the Federal 

Register, Mueller’s withdrawal was submitted after 

the Initiation Notice had been transmitted to the 

Federal Register for publication. 

‘‘discontinue any action in regard to a 

reconsideration’’ of the sunset review. 

Tokyo Kikai Seisakusho, Ltd. v. United 

States. See FULL CITE Slip Op. 07–12. 

In accordance with that is decision, the 

Department is discontinuing action with 

respect toits reconsideration of the 

sunset review. 

Dated: February 26, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–3788 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–881] 

Malleable Cast Iron Pipe Fittings from 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 5, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jennifer Moats, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office 8, Import Administration, Room 

1870, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–5047. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 1, 2006, the Department 

of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) 

published a notice of opportunity to 

request an administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on malleable 

cast iron pipe fittings from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’). See 

Antidumping or Countervailing Duty 

Order, Finding, or Suspended 

Investigation: Opportunity to Request 

Administrative Review, 71 FR 69543 

(December 1, 2006). On December 15, 

2006, Beijing Sai Lin Ke Hardware Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘SLK’’) requested that the 

Department conduct a review of its sales 

and entries of subject merchandise into 

the United States. On January 3, 2007, 

Mueller Comercial de Me ́xico, D. de R.L. 

de C.V. (‘‘Mueller’’) requested that the 

Department conduct an administrative 

review of its sales and entries of subject 

merchandise into the United States. On 

January 4, 2007, SLK withdrew its 

request for review. On January 31, 2007, 

Mueller withdrew its request for an 

administrative review.1 No other parties 

requested a review. On February 2, 

2007, the Department published the 

Initiation Notice covering Mueller, and 

issued an antidumping duty 

questionnaire to Mueller for the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on malleable 

cast iron pipe fittings from the PRC with 

respect to Mueller for the period 

December 1, 2005, through November 

30, 2006. 

Rescission of Review 

The Department’s regulations at 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1) provide that the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review if the party that 

requested the review withdraws its 

request for review within 90 days of the 

date of publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review, or 

withdraws its request at a later date if 

the Department determines that it is 

reasonable to extend the time limit for 

withdrawing the request. Mueller timely 

withdrew its request before the 90-day 

deadline. Therefore, we are rescinding 

this review of the antidumping duty 

order on malleable cast iron pipe fittings 

from the PRC covering the period 

December 1, 2005, through November 

30, 2006. The Department intends to 

issue assessment instructions to U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection 15 days 

after of publication of this rescission. 

Notification Regarding APOs 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 

to govern business proprietary 

information in this segment of the 

proceeding. Timely written notification 

of the return/destruction of APO 

materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with section 777(i)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: February 27, 2007. 

Stephen J. Claeys, 

Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–3797 Filed 3–2–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–886] 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Extension of Time Limit for the Final 

Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 5, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Laurel LaCivita or Matthew Quigley, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 8, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4243 or (202) 482–

4551, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 28, 2005, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of the 

antidumping duty administrative review 

of Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags 

(‘‘PRCBs’’) from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) for the period January 

26, 2004, through July 31, 2005. See 

Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Request for Revocation in 

Part, 70 FR 56631 (September 28, 2005). 

On September 13, 2006, the Department 

published the preliminary results. See 

Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from 

the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, 71 FR 

54021 (September 13, 2006) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). On January 10, 

2007, the Department extended the time 

period for completion of the final results 

of this review. See Polyethylene Retail 

Carrier Bags from the People’s Republic 

of China: Notice of Extension of Time 

Limit for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 72 FR 1216 (January 10, 2007). 

On February 15, 2007, the Department 

extended the time period for completion 

of the final results of this review a 

second time. See Polyethylene Retail 


erjones on PRODPC74 with NOTICES