alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 12.1
 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Nine Months Ended
    
    
    Years Ended December 31,September 30, 2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003($ in thousands)Fixed charges (1):Interest expense
    
    $
    529,524
    
    
    $
    847,241
    
    
    $
    606,725
    
    
    $
    185,935
    
    
    $
    79,053
    
    
    $
    39,956Interest capitalized
    
    
    
    
    
    
    357
    
    
    
    414
    
    
    
    932
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest portion of rental expense
    
    
    1,162
    
    
    
    1,697
    
    
    
    1,327
    
    
    
    1,244
    
    
    
    1,494
    
    
    
    843Total fixed charges
    
    $
    530,686
    
    
    $
    849,295
    
    
    $
    608,466
    
    
    $
    188,111
    
    
    $
    80,547
    
    
    $
    40,799Earnings:Net income before noncontrolling
interest expenses and income
taxes
    
    $
    116,743
    
    
    $
    268,788
    
    
    $
    350,749
    
    
    $
    269,072
    
    
    $
    205,421
    
    
    $
    132,480Fixed charges
    
    
    530,686
    
    
    
    849,295
    
    
    
    608,466
    
    
    
    188,111
    
    
    
    80,547
    
    
    
    40,799Less: Interest capitalized
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (357
    )
    
    
    (414
    )
    
    
    (932
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total earnings
    
    $
    647,429
    
    
    $
    1,117,726
    
    
    $
    958,801
    
    
    $
    456,251
    
    
    $
    285,968
    
    
    $
    173,279Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.2x
    
    
    
    1.3 x
    
    
    
    1.6 x
    
    
    
    2.4 x
    
    
    
    3.6 x
    
    
    
    4.2 x
 
 (1)
    
    Excludes interest related to the application of FIN 48.
Exhibit 32.2 - Certifications

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the quarterly  report of General Steel  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Commission on November 14, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, John Chen,  Director and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-  Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         By: /s/ John Chen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John Chen
                                            Director and Chief Financial Officer


DATED: November 14, 2005
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SAM STOCKERO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D16-4051

[July 20, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Lawrence M. Mirman, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 432008CF001833A.

Tanya M. Dugree of the Chamberlin Law Office, Tampa, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, LEVINE and FORST, JJ., concur. 

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Data Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
W. Howe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Robert W. Howe
---------------------------------------

Robert W. Howe
Chief Executive Officer
August 06, 2003
Page **1** of **1**

MEMORANDUM TO: Air and Radiation Docket EPA
- HQ
- OAR
- 2015
- 0091 FROM: EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality DATE: April 1 4 , 2015 SUBJECT: Teleconference with the National Biodiesel Board On March 30, 2015, EPA held a teleconference with staff of the National Biodiesel Board (NBB), upon their request, to discuss the potential steps in the process, pending public comments, that biodiesel producers could follow to submit a new pathway petitio n to EPA requesting qualification to generate renewable identification numbers (RINs) for fuel produced from pennycress oil. **NBB Staff:** 1. Lindsay

Fitzgerald, Director of Regulatory Affairs 2. Larry Schafer, Senior Government Affairs Consultant **EPA Participants:**  1. Aaron Levy, Office of Air and Radiation (OAR) 2. Jon Monger, OAR
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10237]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection


Notice of Cancellation of Customs Broker License Due to Death of 
the License Holder

AGENCY: Bureau of Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security.

ACTION: General Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to Title 19 of the Code 
of Federal Regulations at section 111.51(a), the following individual 
Customs broker licenses and any and all permits have been cancelled due 
to the death of the broker:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                     License
               Name                 <greek-i>           Port name
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ernest W. Fowble.................        03272  Seattle.
Solveij C. Owen..................         5440  San Francisco.
Bernardo Quan Ng.................        10052  Los Angeles.
------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Dated: February 26, 2007.
Daniel Baldwin,
Assistant Commissioner, Office of International Trade.
 [FR Doc. E7-4024 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
Before the Second Division,

January 1, 1943.

No. 47866.

#### Protest 817023-G of W. T. Grant Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel merchandise described as “Cocoa Door Mats,” similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *Penn*(27 C. C. P. A. 242, C. A. D. 93), was held dutiable as claimed.
SANDEE BRYAN MARION

CHIEF JUSTICE

KAREN ANGELINI

MARIALYN BARNARD

REBECA MARTINEZ

PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ

LUZ ELENA D.CHAPA

JASON PULLtAM

JUSTICES

COURT OF APPEALS FOURTl COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER

300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 320(1

SAN ANTONIO. TEXAS 78205-3037

WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX

May 20, 2015

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

TELEPHONE

(210)335-2635

FACSIMILE NO.

(210)335-2762

Randall Smidt

Harris County Attorney's Office

1019 Congress Street. Floor 15

Houston, TX 77002-1799

Matthew Tepper

700 Jeffrey Way. Suite 100

Round Rock. TX 78665

James S. Frost

Law Office of James S. Frost

113 WGonzales Street

Seguin.TX 78155-5630

RE: Court of Appeals Number:

Style:

04-15-00279-CV

Abdul H. Nubaili V. County of Guadalupe and

Randall R. Smidt

Dear Counsel:

After reviewing the parlies' addendums to the Civil Docketing Statement in the abovenumbered and styled appeal, the court has determined that this dispute is appropriate for referral

to an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) procedure. See TEX. Civ. PraC. REM. Code ANN.

154.021 (Vernon 2(105). The court intends to order the parlies to mediate after the court

determines that it has jurisdiction to consider the appeal upon our receipt of the clerk's record.

The court encourages the parties to proceed to mediation prior to being ordered to do so.

If the parties agree to mediate, the parties should notify Margaret Adams, the court's legal

assistant in charge of ADR. The court will entertain request to extend the appellate deadline for

filing the reporter's record to enable the parties to concentrate on the scheduling and completion

of the mediation process. Any communications regarding mediation should be directed to

Margaret Adams, (210) 335-3854.

On behalf of the entire Court. thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Very truly yours.

MB.'iua
## C OURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00309

- CV

Waterway Ranch, LLC

v.

City of Annetta, Texas §

§

§

§ From the 43rd District Court

o f Parker Count y (CV11

- 0288 )

August 22, 2013

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Waterway Ranch, LLC shall pay all of

the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_________________________________ C hief Justice Terrie Livingsto n
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of FLATBUSH  FEDERAL BANCORP,  INC. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
Anthony J. Monteverdi,  Chairman,  President and Chief Executive  Officer of the
Company and John S. Lotardo,  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.

The purpose of this  statement  is solely to comply  with Title 18,  Chapter 63,
Section  1350 of the United  States  Code,  as  amended  by  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                                                     /s/ Anthony J. Monteverdi
                                                     Anthony J. Monteverdi
                                                     Chairman, President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer



                                                     /s/ John S. Lotardo
                                                     -------------------------

                                                     John S. Lotardo
                                                     Senior Vice President and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 16, 2005
      ------------



                                       16
Exhibit 31(d)

WESTAR ENERGY, INC.

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Anthony D. Somma, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2017, of Westar Energy, Inc.;
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  |                                                             
|----- |  | -------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: |  | April 27, 2018 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/    Anthony D. Somma                                     
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Anthony D. Somma                                            
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|      |  |                |  |  |  |     |  | Westar Energy, Inc.
(Reap. Dec. 10408)

#### Gitkin Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 977489.

(Decided December 27, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for tbe plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Quitfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation reading as follows:

> 1. That tbe merchandise and tbe issues involved in tbe above-entitled appeal for reappraisement are tbe same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Gitkin Co.,*A.R.D. 132, and that tbe record in tbe cited case may be incorporated in tbe record herein.

> 2. That at tbe time of exportation of tbe merchandise involved herein, tbe prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in tbe principal markets of tbe country of exportation for exportation to tbe United States, in tbe usual wholesale quantities and in tbe ordinary course of trade including tbe cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing tbe merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to tbe United States, were tbe appraised *per se*unit values, exclusive of tbe amounts described on tbe invoice under tbe beading “Actual Charges”.

> 3. That tbe involved merchandise was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after February 27, 1958, and is not identified in the Final List published by tbe Secretary of tbe Treasury pursuant to tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).

On the agreed facts, I find that export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise involved and that such values were the appraised *per se*unit values, exclusive of the amounts described on the invoice under the heading “Actual Charges.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 63609.

protest 59/10669 (New York).

#### American Leather Specialties Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of harness hardware for use with harness for dogs the same in all material respects as that involved in *International Expediters, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 230, C.D. 1868), the claim of plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1
                         GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Genesis HealthCare Corporation (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect
to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report") that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




Date:    August 11, 2004                             George V. Hager, Jr.
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     George V. Hager, Jr.
                                                     Chief Executive Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.
No. 50433.

#### Protest 104753-K of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted evidence disclosed- that the banks in question are similar to those the subject of Abstract 42749, which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
1

 2

 3

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DANIEL J. BRODERICK, #89424

Federal Defender

ANN C. Mc

CLINTOCK, Bar #141313

Assistant Federal Defender

801 I Street, 3rd Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-5700

Attorney for Petitioner

JOHN HERMAN PIRTLE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN HERMAN PIRTLE,

Petitioner,

 v.

CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON

TERMS, et al.,

Respondents.

_______________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

DC No. 2:04-cv-0518 FCD KJM P

Eastern District of California, Sacramento

ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR

HEARING ON PETITIONER'S

MOTION FOR RELEASE

Date: Chambers

Time: ----

Judge: Hon. Frank C. Damrell, Jr.

Good cause having been shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's

Request to Shorten Time on Petitioner's Motion for Immediate Release is hereby granted. 

Respondent shall file any opposition to Petitioner's motion on or before August 20,

2010. Petitioner’s reply shall be filed on or before August 24, 2010. A hearing is hereby

scheduled on the motion for August 27, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. before District Court Judge Frank C.

Damrell, Jr., in Courtroom No. 2, 15th Floor, of the United States District Court, 501 I Street,

Sacramento, California, 95814. 

Dated: August 16, 2010

_______________________________

FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00518-GEB-CKD Document 48 Filed 08/17/10 Page 1 of 1
Order for Dismissal of Claims (Household) in Fong v Credit Solutions 

1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Mark F. Anderson (SBN 44787) 

Kan Tung Donohoe (SBN 197785) 

Kemnitzer, Anderson, Barron & Ogilvie LLP 

445 Bush Street, 6th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94108 

Ph: (415) 861-2265 

Fax: (415) 861-3151 

mark@kabolaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Cendra S Fong and Michael W Fong 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CENDRA S FONG and MICHAEL W FONG, 

 Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

CREDIT SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; et al, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. C 04 1929 GEB KJM 

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF 

PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS AS AGAINST 

DEFENDANT HSBC BANK 

NEVADA ERRONEOUSLY SUED AS 

HOUSEHOLD FINANCE 

CORPORATION OF CALIFORNIA 

 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, it is hereby ordered that plaintiffs’ claims against 

defendant HSBC Bank Nevada erroneously sued as Household Finance Corporation of California 

are dismissed with prejudice and without costs to any party. 

DATED: August 30, 2005 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-01929-GEB -KJM Document 44 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.1




 


 





October 15, 2016


 


Full Circle Capital Corporation


102 Greenwich Ave, 2nd Floor


Greenwich, CT 06830


Attention: Chief Executive Officer


 


Gentlemen:


 


We refer to the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of June 23, 2016 (the "Merger Agreement"), by and between Full Circle Capital Corporation, a Maryland corporation
(the "Company") and Great Elm Capital Corp., a Maryland corporation ("Newco"). Capitalized terms used in this
letter without definition have the respective meanings given to them in the Merger Agreement.


 


Per Section 6.1(b)(i) of the Merger Agreement,
Newco hereby extends the Termination Date as provided in the Merger Agreement.


 


This letter does not effect any other change
or waiver under the Merger Agreement. Please sign and return one copy of this letter.


 


Very truly yours,


 


GREAT ELM CAPITAL CORP.


 


/s/ Peter A. Reed


Peter A. Reed


Chief Executive Officer


 


Accepted and agreed as of the date first
written above:


 


FULL CIRCLE CAPITAL CORPORATION


 


 


		By:	/s/ Gregg J. Felton



		Name:	Gregg J. Felton



		Title:	CEO



 


Cc: John A. Healy


Harry Pangas
Case No. 9,766.

#### MOORE v. HOUGH.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 561.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1825.

Justices or Peace — Jurisdictional Amount— Several Notes Given for an Entire Debt.

If an entire debt of $250, be settled by the debtor’s giving his five several promissory notes for $50 each, payable at different times; each note is within the jurisdiction of a justice of the peace; and if all the notes have become payable he may issue his five separate warrants, and render judgment against the debtor in each case.

Appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace in five several cases.

The appellant [Alexander Moore], being indebted to the appellee [George S. Hough] in the sum of $250, gave his five several promissory notes to the appellee, payable at different periods. When they had all become payable he obtained from a justice of the peace five *686separate warrants, upon which the appellant was arrested, and judgment was rendered against him in each case; from which judgments he appealed to this court.

Hr. Fendall and Mr. Mason, for appellant,

contended that the splitting up the debt in this way, was a fraud upon the law, and that as the notes were all due and payable and constituted but one debt, the justice of the peace had not jurisdiction. The words of the act of March 1, 1823 [3 Stat. 743], giving jurisdiction to the justice are, “where the real debt and damages do not exceed the sum of fifty dollars.” Here the real debt exceeds that sum, consequently the justice had not jurisdiction of the case.

Mr. Fendall cited Anon., 1 Vent 65; and Girling v. Alders, Id. 73; Clerk v. Andrews, 1 Show. 11; Girling v. Aldas, 2 Keb. 617; Thompson v. Shepherd, 9 Johns. 262; Caze-nove v. Darrell [Case No. 2,539], in this court at November term, 1823.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

But

THE COURT

affirmed the judgments. CRANCH, Chief Judge, would have looked further into the cases, but the other judges seeming to be clearly against the appellant, he acquiesced.