alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Amendment
      No. 2 to the  Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ending
      December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony T. Castor III, Chief Executive Officer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Anthony T. Castor III


Anthony
      T. Castor III


Chief
      Executive Officer


October
      18, 2006





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
      18 of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing. **** A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the
      Company and will
      be retained by the
      Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                          JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION

SUBSIDIARY LISTING AS OF MARCH 4, 2002

Jefferson-Pilot Corporation (North Carolina corp.)

    The Guarantee Life Companies Inc. (Delaware corp.)

       Jefferson Pilot Financial Insurance Company (Nebraska corp.)(2)

          Jefferson Pilot LifeAmerica Insurance Company (New Jersey corp.)

    HARCO Capital Corp. (Delaware corp.)

    Hampshire Funding Inc. (New Hampshire corp.)

    Jefferson-Pilot Capital Trust A (Delaware business trust)

    Jefferson-Pilot Capital Trust B (Delaware business trust)

    Jefferson-Pilot Communications Company (North Carolina corp.)

       Jefferson-Pilot Communications Company of California (North Carolina
       corp.)

       Jefferson-Pilot Communications Company of Virginia (Virginia corp.)

       Jefferson-Pilot Communications/WBTV, Inc. (North Carolina corp.)

       Jefferson-Pilot Sports, Inc. (North Carolina corp.)

       WCSC, Inc. (South Carolina corp.)

          Tall Tower, Inc. (South Carolina corp.)

    Jefferson Pilot Investment Advisory Corporation (Tennessee corp.)

    Jefferson-Pilot Investments, Inc. (North Carolina corp.)

    Jefferson Pilot Variable Corporation (North Carolina corp.)

    Jefferson-Pilot Life Insurance Company (North Carolina corp.)

       Jefferson Standard Life Insurance Company (North Carolina corp.)

    Jefferson Pilot Securities Corporation (New Hampshire corp.)

       Allied Professional Advisors, Inc. (New Hampshire corp.)

       The Polaris Group, Inc. (Connecticut corp.)

          Polaris Financial Services, Inc. (Connecticut corp.)(2)

          Polaris Advisory Services, Inc. (Connecticut corp.)(2)
---------------

Notes:

(1) Each indentation reflects another tier of ownership.
(2) The immediate parent owns 100% of the voting securities of each entity,
    except that Jefferson-Pilot Corporation directly owns 80% of Jefferson Pilot
    Financial Insurance Company, and 10% of each of the lower tier Polaris
    companies is owned by Jefferson Pilot Securities Corporation.
(3) All entities more than 50% owned are listed, except that various
    subsidiaries that in the aggregate are insignificant have been omitted.

                                       E-6
Exhibit (13) a.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ENACTED BY



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Komatsu, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 3, 2004 as amended by the Form 20-F/A (No.1) and this Form 20-F/A (No.2) dated the date hereof (the Report), I, Masahiro Sakane, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, that:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: December 24, 2004



By:

/s/ Masahiro SakaneMasahiro SakanePresident, Chief Executive Officer




3
(Reap. Dec. 10741)

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 3070, etc.

(Decided May 5, 1964)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Tbe appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of tires and tubes and rimtapes or rimbands or tapes exported from Holland.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States were the invoiced unit prices as entered.

> *541IT IS FURTHER, STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals to reap-praisement herein may be submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I fiad that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise involved herein is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the invoice unit prices, as entered.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Luna Innovations Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kent A. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ KENT A. MURPHY                   
|Kent A. Murphy, Ph.D.                
|President and Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2007
(Reap. Dec. 10396)

Entry No. 36832, etc.

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co., a/c Charles Mathieu, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 13, 1962)

*Lamb & Lereh*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Gwilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following agreement entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the merchandise marked “A” and initialed *FHH*by Examiner *Franklin Sennigan,*on all the entries contained in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of Tale, appraised on the basis of United States value, as that value is defined in Section 402(a), Value (Alternative), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the United States value found by the Appraiser on all of the entries contained in Schedule A attached hereto was $68.31 per 2,000 pounds.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that United States value is the proper basis for appraisement and that the correct United States value

> *486on all tlie entries contained in Schedule A attached hereto, as defined aforesaid, is $38.99 per 2,000 pounds.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed, facts, I find and hold United States value, as that value is defined in section 402a, Value (Alternative), of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value is $38.99 per 2,000 pounds in each case.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(a)

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is entered into as
of April 3, 2001, between JACOBSON STORES INC., a Michigan corporation of
Jackson, Michigan (the "Company"), and P. GERALD MILLS, of Chelsea, Michigan
("Mills").

         THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE that the restated Employment Agreement between
them dated as of June 11, 1998, as amended effective April 11, 1999 and April
16, 2000 (the "Agreement"), is further amended effective April 16, 2001, as
follows:

                  EMPLOYMENT AND TERM. The date "April 15, 2001" in paragraph 1
                  of the Agreement, is amended to read "April 15, 2002".

         Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue in
full force and effect.


IN THE PRESENCE OF:                      JACOBSON STORES INC.



/s/     Edward L. Macek                  By: /s/ Paul W. Gilbert
---------------------------                -------------------------------------
                                                Paul W. Gilbert
                                                Its:  Vice Chairman of the Board


/s/     Dana J. Collins                      /s/ P. Gerald Mills
---------------------------                -------------------------------------
                                                 P. Gerald Mills
```

[House Document 113-12]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

113th Congress, 1st Session - - - - - - - - - - - - - House Document 113-12

 
             DEPLOYMENT OF U.S. MILITARY PERSONNEL IN NIGER

                               __________

                             COMMUNICATION

                                  from

                   THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

                              transmitting

A NOTIFICATION THAT THE LAST ELEMENTS OF A DEPLOYMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 
   40 ADDITIONAL U.S. MILITARY PERSONNEL HAVE ENTERED NIGER WITH THE 
                   CONSENT OF THE GOVERNMENT OF NIGER

 February 25, 2013.--Referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs and 
                         ordered to be printed
                                           The White House,
                                     Washington, February 22, 2013.
Hon. John Boehner,
Speaker of the House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
    Dear Mr. Speaker: On February 20, 2013, the last elements 
of a deployment of approximately 40 additional U.S. military 
personnel entered Niger with the consent of the Government of 
Niger. This deployment will provide support for intelligence 
collection and will also facilitate intelligence sharing with 
French forces conducting operations in Mali, and with other 
partners in the region. The total number of U.S. military 
personnel deployed to Niger is approximately 100. The recently 
deployed forces have deployed with weapons for the purpose of 
providing their own force protection and security.
    I directed this deployment of U.S. forces in furtherance of 
U.S. national security interests, and pursuant to my 
constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and 
as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive.
    I am providing this report as part of my efforts to keep 
the Congress fully informed, consistent with the War Powers 
Resolution (Public Law 93-148). I appreciate the support of the 
Congress in this action.
            Sincerely,
                                                      Barack Obama.

                                  

```
Exhibit (13) b.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ENACTED BY



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F of Komatsu, Ltd. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 3, 2004 as amended by
this Form 20-F/A dated the date hereof (the Report), I, Kenji Kinoshita, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (s) 1350, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 4, 2004



By:

/s/ Kenji KinoshitaKenji KinoshitaSenior Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer




28
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.2   PATIENT PORTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


     Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Thomas Hagan, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Patient Portal  Technologies,
Inc. (the "Registrant"),  certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB for the period  ended March 31,
2007 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)[15(d)]
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.


Dated:  5/30/2007            /s/ THOMAS HAGAN
                             -----------------------
                             Thomas Hagan
                             Chief Financial Officer












--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Case No. 14,450.

#### UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 157.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1818.

Bail — Prison Boxds — Action by United States.

A prisoner in execution for debt, at the suit of the United States, is entitled to the benefit of the prison bounds, upon giving sufficient security.

[See Case No. 353.]

The defendant [James Anderson] was brought in by the marshal at the suit of the United States, upon a ca. sa. for debt; and applied for the benefit of the prison bounds, and tendered a bond with sufficient sureties.

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, doubting)

decided that he was entitled to the benefit of the bounds. See Acts Cong. Jan. 0, 1800, § 1 (2 Stat. 4). for the relief of persons imprisoned for debt, and March 3, 1803, §§ 16, 17 (2 Stat. 241), for the relief of insolvent debtors, within the District of Columbia.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4048 

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. COONS, Mr. TILLIS, Ms. STABENOW, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, 

Mr. CRAPO, Ms. SMITH, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation 

Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘North American Wet5 lands Conservation Extension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

7 Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Con8 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking 

9 ‘‘of this Act not to exceed $60,000,000 for each of fiscal 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4048 IS

1 years 2021 through 2025’’ and inserting ‘‘not more than 

2 $65,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 2028’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES JOSEPH DURAN, JR.,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1875 DFL KJM P

vs.

JAMES POPE,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 12, 2005, the court ordered respondent to

show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failing to respond to the court’s May 17, 2005

order. Respondent filed a response to the order to show cause on October 18, 2005. 

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01875-JKS-KJM Document 10 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court’s October 12, 2005 order to show cause is discharged;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve respondent’s counsel with a copy of

petitioner’s November 11, 2004 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus; and

3. Respondent shall file a response to petitioner’s application for writ of habeas

corpus within thirty days of this order. 

DATED: October 25, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

dura1875.ext

Case 2:04-cv-01875-JKS-KJM Document 10 Filed 10/26/05 Page 2 of 2
# ***Exhibit 32.1***

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of CHAAS Acquisitions, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Terence C. Seikel, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/ Terence C. Seikel                 |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Terence C. Seikel                     |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |
| August 11, 2004                       |   |

 

----
No. 58535.

protests 207543-K, etc. (New York).

#### Jos. H. Reinfeld, Inc., and Somerset Importers, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 61859.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 309261-K, 309262-K, and 309263-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of cameras, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

 Docket Number: FAA-2012-1035

 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM235AD

ON CD:

A320-32-1346, R03 --- 1/7/10

A320-32-1346, R02 --- 11/4/09

A320-32-1346, R01 --- 10/27/09

A320-32-1348 --- 12/3/08

A320-32-1349, R03 --- 10/5/11

A320-32-1349, R02 --- 1/16/10

A320-32-1349, R01 --- 8/31/09

A320-32-1349 --- 12/4/08

GE 200-32-535 --- 10/13/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
No. 50059.

#### Petition 6410-R of Acker & Jablow (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the time of importation two questions were raised by the appraiser, one relating to an item of 5 percent which the importer claimed was a buying commission. A test case was established and the importer was sustained. *(Cohen & Mann*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 4647, affirmed in Reap. Dec. 4865.) That decision was followed in connection with the entries involved herein *(Cohen & Mann*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 5967).

The second question arose as to one item invoiced as "Dewet'’ cloth. The customs broker testified that because the merchandise was the first shipment of this kind, the examiner wanted an investigation made; that as a result of said investigation, the examiner found several sales had been made on the other side to small dealers; that the appraiser found there was a foreign-market value; that it was decided to appeal to reappraisement, but when it became impossible to try the case, due to war conditions, the appeal was abandoned. A witness for the petitioner testified that a few sales were made at retail for consumption in Poland; that the merchandise imported by the petitioner was of better quality than that sold in Poland; and that this information was given to the examiner. The court held that the petitioners were without intent to defraud the Government or deceive its officials as to the proper value of the merchandise and that there was an honest difference of opinion between the importer and the Government appraiser as to the proper basis of valuation. *(Syndicate Trading Co.*v. *United States,*13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 409, T. D. 41339, cited.) The petition was therefore granted:
May 7, 1947

No. 51704.

Suit 4551.

#### Whittaker, *Clark & Daniels, Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 985 reversed March 25, 1947. C. A. D. 360.