alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2006314EN.01000701.xml

| 21.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2006/C 314/03)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25.1.2006 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 305/05 |
| Member State | Poland |
| Title | Zobowiązania operatorów sieci telefonicznych |
| Legal basis | Ustawa z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o restrukturyzacji zobowiązań koncesyjnych operatorów stacjonarnych sieci telefonicznych |
| Type of measure | Aid scheme |
| Intensity | Measure does not constitute aid |
| Duration | 28 December 2002 — 31 December 2004 |
| Economic sectors | Post and telecommunications |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Minister ds. Łączności |

Date of adoption of the decision

25.1.2006

Reference number of the aid

N 305/05

Member State

Poland

Title

Zobowiązania operatorów sieci telefonicznych

Legal basis

Ustawa z dnia 23 listopada 2002 r. o restrukturyzacji zobowiązań koncesyjnych operatorów stacjonarnych sieci telefonicznych

Type of measure

Aid scheme

Intensity

Measure does not constitute aid

Duration

28 December 2002 — 31 December 2004

Economic sectors

Post and telecommunications

Name and address of the granting authority

Minister ds. Łączności

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

| Date of adoption of the decision | 22.3.2006 |
| --- | --- |
| Reference number of the aid | N 638/05 |
| Member State | France |
| Region | Corse |
| Title | Aide à la création de la chaîne corse Via Stella |
| Legal basis | Convention d'objectifs et de moyens de la chaîne Via Stella entre l'Etat français, la Collectivité Territoriale de Corse et France 3 |
| Type of measure | Individual aid |
| Objective | Sectoral development |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: EUR 6,2 million |
| Duration | 31 December 2008 |
| Economic sectors | Media |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Collectivité Territoriale de Corse |

Date of adoption of the decision

22.3.2006

Reference number of the aid

N 638/05

Member State

France

Region

Corse

Title

Aide à la création de la chaîne corse Via Stella

Legal basis

Convention d'objectifs et de moyens de la chaîne Via Stella entre l'Etat français, la Collectivité Territoriale de Corse et France 3

Type of measure

Individual aid

Objective

Sectoral development

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: EUR 6,2 million

Duration

31 December 2008

Economic sectors

Media

Name and address of the granting authority

Collectivité Territoriale de Corse

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
<PAGE>
 
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Keane, Inc. on Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-00175, 33-16187, 33-00176, 2-76657, 2-
91931, 33-16188, 33-38361, 2-40012, 2-87193, 2-61721, 2-89418, 33-38360, 33-
38361, 33-52760, 33-52758, 33-52756, 33-52762, 333-16113, 333-56119 and 333-
62759) and Form S-3 and S-3/A (File Nos. 333-46329, 333-56733, 333-61741 and
333-66937) of our report dated February 26, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Keane, Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and
1997, and for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1997 and 1996, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                         /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 1999
No. 65485.

#### Empire Findings Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/30615, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of otoscopes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Findings Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 21, C.D. 2148), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

February 15, 1945

No. 50025.

#### Petition 6227-R of Stern Hat Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial the witness for the petitioner testified that he had made all the entries herein; that he and the petitioner, Mr. Stern, had talked with the appraiser advising him that the hats were not sold in Italy but were made specially for the petitioner; and that the appraiser stated if that was the case they could enter them on an export basis, which they did. On appeal to reappraisement the single judge sustained the appraiser in his finding of United States value (Reap. Dec. 4166) and the Third Division affirmed the single judge’s decision (Reap. Dec. 4321). On appeal the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals reversed and remanded the case on the ground that only the sale of merchandise imported previous to the dates of exportation of the merchandise being appraised could be used as a basis for arriving at United States value (26 C. C. P. A. 410, C. A. D. 48). On rehearing (Reap. Dec. 5032), it was held that cost of production was established as to some of the items and that the plaintiff had failed to meet the burden of proof on the balance, so that the appeals were dismissed although tbe appraiser’s finding of United States value was erroneous. The court held that the importer was without intent to defraud the Government or deceive its officials as to the proper value of the merchandise and that there was an honest difference of opinion between the importer and the Government appraiser as to the proper basis of valuation. *(Alex Schechter Corp.*v. *United States,*4 Cust. Ct. 17, C. D. 272 cited.) The petition was therefore granted.
# C_2006301EN.01001001.xml

| 12.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/10

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

(2006/C 301/03)

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: France

Aid No: N 242/06

Title: Rescue aid for the undertaking Hubbard SAS.

Objective: To rescue an undertaking in difficulty.

Legal basis: Circulaire du ministre de l'agriculture et de la pêche DPEI/SDEPA/C 2006-4019 du 15.3.2006

Budget: Overall budget: EUR 4 500 000.

Aid intensity or amount: The aid of EUR 4,5 million is to be paid in the form of a repayable advance subject to an interest rate of 3,7 %.

Duration: Six months.

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

Date of adoption of the decision:

Member State: France

Aid No: N 273/06

Title: Rescue aid for the undertaking SA Tilly-Sabco

Objective: To rescue an undertaking in difficulty

Legal basis: Circulaire du ministre de l'agriculture et de la pêche DPEI/SDEPA/C 2006-4019 du 15.3.2006

Budget: Overall budget: EUR 3 600 000

Aid intensity or amount: The aid of EUR 3,6 million is to be paid in the form of a repayable advance subject to an interest rate of 3,7 %.

Duration: Six months

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/community_law/state_aids/

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6910

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
TYRONE YOUNG , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Danville

. James P. Jones , Senior District Judge. ( 4:18

- cr - 00017

- JPJ

- 1 )

Submitted : February 21 , 2023 Decided: February 24, 2023

Before NIEMEYER and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tyrone Young, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Patrick Jones, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Roanoke, Virginia; Kari Kristina Munro, FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE , PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6910 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Young appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for leave to supplement his motion for relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52( b) and 59(e). We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Young , No. 4:18

- cr - 00017

- JPJ

- 1 (W.D. Va. Aug. 1 , 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequ ately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6910 Doc: 8 Filed: 02/24/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 50024.

#### Protests 110955-K, etc., of Harmar Co. et al. (Louisville).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 61320.

protest 308796-K (New York).

#### The Dynamo Tulle Importing Co., Inc., and H. W. Robinson Air Freight Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk malines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

s0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

146865

DIANE WIEGMANN, Individually and as

Successor Trustee of the ROBERT E.

McGOWAN DECLARATION OF TRUST,

ROBERT E. McGOWAN, JR., and

DONNA GILLUND,

Plaintiffs/Counter

- Defendants

- Appellants,

v SC: 146865

COA: 306137

Berrien CC: 2010

- 000085

- CH

SAMUEL THOMAS and RHONDA THOMAS,

Defendants/Counter

- Plaintiffs

- Appellees,

and

EDMUND J. FREZA, CAROL A. FREZA, and

CHEMICAL BANK,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2013

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Roy Brown, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Wired Associates
     Solutions Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
13th day of June, 2007.


/s/ Roy Brown
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 11, 2022 No. 04-22-00600-CR EX PARTE Rafael Alfaro LEIJA , From the County Court, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10469CR Honorable Tully Shahan, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R On September 7, 2022, appellant filed a notice of appeal from an order denying a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. The clerk’s record, which was filed on September 28, 2022, did not contain a certification of defendant’s right to appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). On October 6, 2022, the County and District Clerk of Kinney County filed a notification of late record stating the clerk’s office had not yet received the trial court’s certification of defendant’s right to appeal. The clerk’s notification stated a supplemental record would be filed “[a]s soon as we receive the Trial Court Certificate.” With exceptions that do not apply here, the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that “[t]he trial court shall enter a certification of the defendant’s right of appeal each time it enters a judgment of guilt or other appealable order[.]” Id. ; see also T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 311.016(2) (“‘Shall’ imposes a duty.”). An order denying a pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus is an appealable order. See Greenwell v. Court of Appeals for the Thirteenth Judicial Dist. , 159 S.W.3d 645, 650 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Ex parte Matthews , 452 S.W.3d 8, 12 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2014, no pet.). Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare and file a certification of appellant’s right to appeal from the order denying appellant’s pretrial application for writ of habeas corpus. We further ORDER the County and District Clerk of Kinney County to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s certification by October 31, 2022.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of October, 2022.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wired Associates Solutions Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacqueline Winwood, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
15th day of June, 2009.


/s/ Jacqueline Winwood
-------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**





**As
      Adopted Pursuant To**





**Section
      906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Samuel
      F. Occhipinti, Chief Financial Officer of Solomon Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





• 
      the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September
      30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





• the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.





/s/
            Samuel
                F. OcchipintiSamuel
              F. OcchipintiChief
              Financial Officer(principal
              financial and accounting officerNovember
              15, 2007
**
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) andRule 15d-14(a)**

**of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

I, Charles E. Drimal, Jr., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of PrimeEnergy ResourcesCorporation; and 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. 

 
Date: April 17, 2019  
/s/ Charles E. Drimal, Jr.
  Charles E. Drimal, Jr.  Chairman, President**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD T. KENNEDY, No. CIV S-04-1591-DFL-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed this action on August 6, 2004. The matter

was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On October 21, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff's copy of the findings and

recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff's responsibility to

keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(d),

Case 2:04-cv-01591-DFL-CMK Document 6 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 21, 2005, are adopted in

full;

2. This action is dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with

court orders and rules; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. 

DATED: 12/22/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01591-DFL-CMK Document 6 Filed 12/29/05 Page 2 of 2
I-1

LCC IC

OC

r

t

t

= +

+

∑

(1 )

(5.1)

APPENDIX I: ERRATA APPENDIX

I.1 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 4

page 4-12:

Table 4.8 Revised Reverse Engineering Production Cost Multipliers for 3-ton Unitary

Equipment

Efficiency

Level

(SEER)

Split Air

Conditioner

(cased coil)

Split Air

Conditioner

(fancoil)

Split Heat Pump Packaged Air

Conditioner

Packaged Heat

Pump

Original Revised Original Revised Original Revised Original Revised Original Revised

10 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

11 1.12 1.12 1.21 1.16 -- 1.05 -- 1.09 -- 1.08

12 1.28 1.28 -- 1.25 1.11 1.13 1.14 1.16 1.10 1.13

13 1.44 1.44 1.66 1.42 1.35 1.30 1.47 1.43 -- 1.38

14 1.60 1.60 1.76 1.82 1.63 1.79 -- 1.74 -- 1.74

15 -- -- 1.96 1.99 1.84 1.94 -- 1.87 -- 1.86

page 4-23: Replace first sentence, first paragraph with the following:

The highest efficiency level that is “technologically feasible” is known as “Max Tech.”

page 4-36: Replace last sentence, first paragraph with the following:

However, along with other potential drawbacks, not being applicable to indoor coil and heat pump

applications limits its potential use to cooling-only condensers.

I.2 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 5

page 5-9:

 EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 312
I-2

U year age U year age

U

U

movals tired

movals

age

tired

age

Re Re

Re

Re

( , ) = ( , ) ⋅

∑

∑

=

=

1

30

1

30 (6.6)

( )

( )

PBP years Rebutt

$2510 $2243

$355 $310 = .

−

−

= 58

[ ( )]

Prob

Price-PWF*OS) Income

=

+

− + ⋅

1

1

a b

e

(

(6.24)

page 5-65: Replace first sentence, first paragraph with the following:

The assumed annualized repair cost for baseline efficiency centralair-conditioning and heat pump

equipment (i.e., the cost the consumer pays annually for repairing equipment) and equipment with

efficiencies greater than 13 SEER are based on the following expression:

page 5-111:

I.3 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 6

page 6-9:

page 6-23:

 EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 312
I-3

-40

-35

-30

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

20062011201620212026

Year

Jobs (Thousands)

Trial Standard 1

Trial Standard 2

Trial Standard 3

Trial Standard 4

Trial Standard 5

Figure 12.3 Employment Impacts of Changes in Equipment Cost

I.4 ERRATA TO CHAPTER 12

page 12-5:

 EE-RM-STD-98-440 COMMENT 312
Exhibit 32.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christine R. Piano, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
           15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
           material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
           of the Company.



August 11, 2004                                /s/ Christine R. Piano
---------------------                          ---------------------------------
                                               Chief Financial Officer