alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Curative Health Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
Feshbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                                /s/ Joseph Feshbach
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Joseph Feshbach
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                    May 10, 2004
No. 48483.

#### Protests 85861-K, etc., of Hochschild, Kohn & Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT LEE TUNSTALL, JR., No. CIV-S-04-1512 MCE/DAD P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

TINA DAY, ET AL., 

Defendants.

____________________________/

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On March 25, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-01512-MCE -DAD Document 8 Filed 05/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of

the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was

properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep

the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant

to Local Rule 83-182(f), service of documents at the record

address of the party is fully effective.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 25, 2005,

are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to keep

the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-

182(f) and 11-110.

DATED: May 12, 2005

__________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01512-MCE -DAD Document 8 Filed 05/12/05 Page 2 of 2
**R1 R2** 

NOTE: 1) All process transfers occur through closed pipelines except for loading of product delivery truck (flexible hose) and QC sampling (1 - Liter containers with lids). 

### ATTACHMENT

SEVEN: SULFONIC ACID PRODUCTION DIAGRAM

CONFIDENTIAL
No. 63089.

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/12546 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Network Capital, Inc.
File No. 000-32155

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Network Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bruce Cairney,  Chief
Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 19, 2004                                 By: /s/ Bruce Cairney
      ------------                                    --------------------------
                                                                   Bruce Cairney
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Network Capital,  Inc. and will be retained by Network Capital, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

Asof June 30, 2006, subsidiaries of the Company and the jurisdiction in whicheach company was incorporated are listed below. Unless other wise indicated,all of the voting securities of each subsidiary are owned by K-telInternational, Inc. or one of its subsidiaries.

DominionEntertainment, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel Entertainment (CAN)Inc.

Winnipeg,Manitoba (a Canada corporation)

K-tel Entertainment(U.K.) Ltd.

London,England (an England corporation)

K-tel Direct Limited

London,England (an England corporation)

K-tel (Australia) Pty.Limited

Forbes,N.S.W. Australia (an Australian corporation)

K-tel TV, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel Entertainment, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel Services, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

Dominion Vertriebs GmbH

Frankfurt,Germany (a German corporation)

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO CANODY, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1168 FCD KJM P

vs.

SCOTT KERNAN, Warden, et al., 

Respondents. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state prison inmate proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He challenges his 1999 Sacramento Superior Court

conviction for robbery with the use of a weapon and the resulting “three strikes”-based sentence

of forty-one-years-to-life. Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss, alleging that the case is

duplicative of the action already pending in Canody v. Director, Department Of Corrections, 

Civ. No. S-03-2296 GEB JFM P, and that it was not filed within the AEDPA statute of

limitations. 

The instant petition contains four challenges to petitioner’s conviction: (1) denial

of the right to a speedy trial under California Penal Code section 1382; (2) denial of the right to a

line-up before the preliminary hearing; (3) ineffective assistance of counsel, based on counsel’s 

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01168-FCD-KJM Document 9 Filed 08/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

failure to assert petitioner’s right to a speedy trial or adequately argue the motion for a line-up;

and (4) prosecutorial misconduct based on the prosecutor’s use of petitioner’s prior convictions

to ask petitioner to admit he was a thief.

In the previously filed action, which is still pending, petitioner challenges the

same Sacramento Superior Court conviction on the same grounds as in the instant case. See Am.

Pet., Canody v. Director, Department of Corrections, Civ. No. S-03-2296 GEB JFM P (docket

no. 5). 

In light of the prior action, the instant petition is duplicative and must be

dismissed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 (f). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that respondent’s motion to

dismiss be granted. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections

shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised

that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 5, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

cano1168.157

Case 2:04-cv-01168-FCD-KJM Document 9 Filed 08/08/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOWARD ALAN ZOCHLINSKI,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, 

et al.,

Defendants.

CIV. S-04-1702 DFL PAN PS

ORDER

-o0oOn October 28, 2005, plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal

of this court’s September 30, 2005, final judgment and an

application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to Federal Rule

of Appellate Procedure 24(a). 

Plaintiff’s application fails to include the Ninth

Circuit’s “Form 4: Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission

to Appeal in Forma Pauperis,” the completion of which is required

by Rule 24(a)(1)(A). Form 4 is available on the Ninth Circuit’s

Case 2:04-cv-01702-DFL-PAN Document 29 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

website at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov. 

Accordingly, plaintiff shall file a completed Form 4 in

this court within 15 days of service of this order for the

court’s further consideration of his application to proceed on

appeal in forma pauperis.

So ordered.

Dated: November 9, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01702-DFL-PAN Document 29 Filed 11/10/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT PAUL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S 04-1589 DFL GGH P

vs.

T. GUZMAN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On June 17, 2005, plaintiff filed a “Notice of Change of Address.” That

document was not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted to

the court for consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to

be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has

filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendants, then documents submitted by

plaintiff must be served on that attorney and not on the defendants. Every document submitted

conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate

stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and

the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01589-DFL-GGH Document 22 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s June 17, 2005 “Notice of Change of Address”

on counsel for defendants and shall file proper proof of said service. Plaintiff is cautioned that

failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff is further

cautioned that failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and

failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed.

DATED: 7/13/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

paul1589.35

Case 2:04-cv-01589-DFL-GGH Document 22 Filed 07/14/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                      KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                                                      STATE OF
NAME OF COMPANY                                                    INCORPORATION
---------------                                                    -------------

Gas Natural del Noroeste, S.A. de C.V.                                 Mexico

Kinder Morgan (Delaware), Inc.                                         Delaware

Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc.                                               Delaware

Kinder Morgan Power Company                                            Colorado

K N Cogeneration                                                       Colorado

K N Natural Gas, Inc.                                                  Colorado

K N Thermo, LLC                                                        Colorado

K N TransColorado, Inc.                                                Colorado

K N Wattenberg Transmission Limited Liability Company                  Colorado

MidCon Corp.                                                           Delaware

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America                                Delaware

Northern Gas Company                                                   Wyoming

Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company                                     Colorado

Slurco Corporation                                                     Colorado

Thermo Greeley L.L.C.                                                  Colorado
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4218 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 615
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4218

To designate the visitor center for the First State National Historical 
 Park to be located at the Sheriff's House in New Castle, Delaware, as 
                the ``Thomas R. Carper Visitor Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2024

   Mr. Coons introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                           November 21, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the visitor center for the First State National Historical 
 Park to be located at the Sheriff's House in New Castle, Delaware, as 
                the ``Thomas R. Carper Visitor Center''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE VISITOR CENTER FOR THE FIRST STATE 
              NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK IN NEW CASTLE, DELAWARE, AS THE 
              ``THOMAS R. CARPER VISITOR CENTER''.

    (a) Designation.--The visitor center for the First State National 
Historical Park to be located at the Sheriff's House in New Castle, 
Delaware, or any successor to that visitor center that is constructed 
after the date of enactment of this Act and serves as the primary 
visitor center for the First State National Historical Park, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Thomas R. Carper Visitor Center''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the visitor center 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Thomas R. Carper Visitor Center''.
                                                       Calendar No. 615

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4218

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To designate the visitor center for the First State National Historical 
 Park to be located at the Sheriff's House in New Castle, Delaware, as 
                the ``Thomas R. Carper Visitor Center''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 21, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v PAUL W. KINGSTON, Private, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

19 USCMA 7, 41 CMR 7

No. 22,177

October 3, 1969

*Captain John J. Rupreeht,*USMCR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

The law officer’s inquiry into the providency of the accused’s plea of guilty to a charge of desertion, in violation of Article 85, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 885, is comparable to the inquiry made in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247.

The accused, in mitigation, however, confesses to only unauthorized absence. His testimony, therefore, furnishes no support for the providence of his plea of guilty to desertion.

Accordingly, the decision of the board of review is reversed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing may be ordered on the original charge or the Court of Military Review may reassess the sentence on the basis of a finding of guilty of the lesser included offense of absence without leave.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Quinn, Chief Judge

(dissenting):

The record indicates the accused absented himself when he received orders for duty in the Far East. He remained away for almost one year and a half. At trial, he admitted he “didn’t come back voluntarily.” He further admitted he knew “the elements of the offenses” to which he intended to plead guilty and that the decision to plead guilty had “originate [d] ” with him and his counsel and had resulted in a pretrial agreement with the convening authority as to the maximum sentence the latter would approve. The agreer *8ment indicates the accused had consulted with his lawyer in regard to the offenses which were listed in the agreement. There is no doubt in my mind, therefore, that the accused knew and understood the nature and the elements of the offenses to which he had pleaded guilty. United States v Gremillion, 18 USCMA 568, 40 CMR 280; United States v Graan, 18 USCMA 586, 40 CMR 298. I would affirm the decision of the board of review.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

RANDY E. STODGEL, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4747 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 15, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Frederick R. Hardt, Judge. Randy E. Stodgel, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, KELLY, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
|  |  |     |
|--|--|--------------------|

|  |    |  |    |  |    |  |    |  |    |  |    |  |    |  |    |  |    |
|--|--------------|--|--------------|--|--------------|--|--------------|--|--------------|--|--------------|--|--------------|--|--------------|--|--------------|

Email To A Friend  
Spanish Version
Home : Diabetes A-Z List of Topics and Titles :  Diabetes Dictionary Diabetes Dictionary
This dictionary defines words that are often used when people talk or write about diabetes.  It is designed for people who have diabetes and for their families and friends.

The words are listed in alphabetical order.  Some words have many meanings; only those meanings that relate to diabetes are included.  Words that appear in ***bold italic*** are defined elsewhere in the dictionary.  A term will refer the reader to another definition only when the second definition gives additional information about a topic that is directly related to the first term.

Information in this dictionary is not a substitute for your health care professional's advice.

The U.S. Government does not endorse or favor any specific commercial product or company.  Trade, proprietary, or company names appearing in this document are used only because they are considered essential in the context of the information provided.  If a product is not mentioned, this does not mean or imply that the product is unsatisfactory.

Diabetes Dictionary Index
A B C D E F G H I J K L 
M N O P R S T U V W X [Top]National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse
1 Information Way         Bethesda, MD 20892-3560              Email: ndic@info.niddk.nih.gov

The National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse (NDIC) is a service of         the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK).         The NIDDK is part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department         of Health and Human Services. Established in 1978, the clearinghouse provides         information about diabetes to people with diabetes and to their families,         health care professionals, and the public. NDIC answers inquiries, develops         and distributes publications, and works closely with professional and         patient organizations and Government agencies to coordinate resources         about diabetes. 

Publications produced by the clearinghouse are carefully reviewed by both NIDDK 		scientists and outside experts. 

This e-text is not copyrighted. The clearinghouse encourages users of         this e-pub to duplicate and distribute as many copies as desired.

NIH Publication No. 04-3016November 2003
[Top]				  
Diabetes Home | Introduction |  Treatments | Complications |  Statistics | Clinical Trials |  in Spanish | Additional Resources | Order Publications | About Us | 
A-Z List of Diabetes Topics and Titles | Contact Us  | Satisfaction Survey | Health InformationThe NDIC is a service of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of HealthNational Diabetes Information Clearinghouse1 Information WayBethesda, MD 20892-3560Phone: 1-800-860-8747Fax: (703) 821-2098Email: ndic@info.niddk.nih.govPrivacy | Disclaimer | Accessibility