alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4466 

To direct the Attorney General to prepare a report on the Department 

of Justice activities related to countering Chinese national security 

threats, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2024 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Attorney General to prepare a report on the 

Department of Justice activities related to countering 

Chinese national security threats, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Countering Chinese 

5 Espionage Reporting Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4466 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ACTIVITIES 

2 RELATED TO COUNTERING CHINESE NA3 TIONAL SECURITY THREATS. 

4 (a) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 90 days after the 

5 date of enactment of this Act, and each year thereafter 

6 for 7 years, the Attorney General shall submit to the Com7 mittees on the Judiciary of the Senate and of the House 

8 of Representatives, and make publicly available on the 

9 website of the Department of Justice, a report that in10 cludes each of the following: 

11 (1) A description of the activities and oper12 ations of the Department of Justice related to coun13 tering Chinese national security threats and espio14 nage in the United States, including— 

15 (A) theft of United States intellectual 

16 property (including trade secrets) and research; 

17 and 

18 (B) threats from non-traditional collectors, 

19 such as researchers in laboratories, at univer20 sities, and at defense industrial base facilities 

21 (as that term is defined in section 2208(u)(3) 

22 of title 10, United States Code). 

23 (2) An accounting of the resources of the De24 partment of Justice that are dedicated to programs 

25 aimed at combating national security threats posed 

26 by the Chinese Communist Party, and any supVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:19 Jul 24, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4466.IS S4466

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4466 IS

1 porting information as to the efficacy of each such 

2 program. 

3 (3) A detailed description of the measures used 

4 to ensure the protection of civil rights, civil liberties, 

5 and privacy rights of United States persons in car6 rying out the activities, operations, and programs 

7 described in paragraphs (1) and (2). 

8 (b) FORM.—The report under subsection (a) shall be 

9 submitted in unclassified form, but may include a classi10 fied annex. 

11 (c) CONSULTATION.—In preparing the report under 

12 subsection (a), the Attorney General shall collaborate with 

13 the Director of National Intelligence, the Secretary of 

14 Homeland Security, the Secretary of Defense, and any 

15 other appropriate officials. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 52592.

protests 991398-G, etc. (Boston, Chicago, and Tampa).

#### Dolliff & McGrath et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
AFS-12-032-E December 2, 2011

Exemption No. 10031A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2002-11937

Mr. Travis J. Garnick

President Butler Aircraft Company

1050 Southeast Sisters Avenue Redmond, OR 97756

Dear Mr. Garnick:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10031. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 12, 2011, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Butler Aircraft Company (Butler) for an extension of Exemption No. 10031. That exemption from § 91.611 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Butler to conduct ferry flights with one engine inopera tive on its DC-6/DC-7 aircraft (registration Nos. N401US, N6353C, and N838D) without obtaini ng a special flight permit for each flight.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Butler.

Our Decision

The FAA has determ ined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10031 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. This exemption applies to the following DC-6/DC-7 series aircraft operated by Butler: registration Nos. N401US, N6353C, and N838D.

2. All one-engine-inoperative ferry flights must be conducted in accordance with the provisions contained in the FAA-approved flight manual required by Aircraft Specification Nos. A-781 and 4A10.

3. The airplane flight manual and operator’s manual must contain performance data and operating and maintenance procedures for the safe operation of the airplane as required by § 91.611 and approved by the FAA Flight Standards District Office responsible for Butler.

4. Flights will be permitted only when visual flight rules conditions exist at points of takeoff and landing or any alternate points of landing and must be limited to crew essential to the purpose of the flight.

5. Each pilot in command must be given adequate training in three-engine ferry flight operation and an appropriate entry made in his/her logbook by a person so authorized by Butler.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 10031 to March 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 10031 remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 10031.

Sincerely,

/s/

John W. McGraw Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v SAMUEL HUFF, Jr., Seaman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

19 USCMA 56, 41 CMR 56

No. 22,324

November 7, 1969

*Captain Jeffery W. Maurer,*USMC, and *Lieutenant Kenneth F. Ripple,*JAGC, USNR, were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC, and *Captain Patricia A. Murphy,*USMC, were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

PER Curiam:

The accused was convicted by a special court-martial of various acts of misconduct directed against other members of the armed forces. He contends that since the offenses were committed in the civilian community and are cognizable in a civilian court they are not triable by court-martial under O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969).

Assaults and other injuries by one member of the armed forces against another are acts having military significance and are, therefore, not within the constitutional limitation on court-martial jurisdiction expounded in the *O’Callahan*case. United States v Plamondon, 19 USCMA 22, 41 CMR 22. The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
No. 47366.

#### Protests 1506-K, etc., of Border Brokerage Co., Inc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. *Ct.*161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held *377that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported, and that no addition should have been made for the planing, tonguing, and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE McGEE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1603 GEB DAD P

vs.

O. DICKINSON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 17, 2006, defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, or in

the alternative, summary adjudication. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to the motion or

statement of non-opposition to the motion. The court will order plaintiff to file a response.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days from the

service of this order, plaintiff shall file his opposition to defendants’ March 17, 2006 motion for

summary judgment or summary adjudication, or a statement of non-opposition to the granting of

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 36 Filed 09/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

the motion. Should plaintiff fail to comply with this court’s order, the court will recommend that

this action be dismissed. 

DATED: September 22, 2006.

DAD:4

rich1603.fto

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 36 Filed 09/25/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

October 18, 1951

No. 55927.

petition 6777-R (Pembina).

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

When this case was called for trial there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. An examination of the official record failing to disclose any reason which would justify granting the petition, same was denied.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000Draft&K000000 Bulletin No. 2017-07	&"Arial,Bold"VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 07-20-17
Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 1 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 2 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 3 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 4 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 5 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 6 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 7 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 8 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 9 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 10 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 11 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 12 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 13 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 14 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 15 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 16 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 17 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 18 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 19 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 20 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 21 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 22 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 23 of 24

Case 2:04-cv-01790-KJM   Document 26    Filed 12/16/05   Page 24 of 24

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-24T21:05:23-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# San Joaquin 

# Valley AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

March 30,2007 Mr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluations Section California Air Resources Board P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 9581 2 Dear Mr. Guzzetta: Attached isthe Rule Action Package for Rule 4565 (Biosolids, Animal Manure, and Poultry Litter Operations),which was adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Governing Board on March 15, 2007. We request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit Rule 4565 and the appropriate documentationto the United States Enviror~mental ProtectionAgency (EPA) as a State lrr~plerr~entatior~ Plan (SIP) revision. Includedwith this Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 2. Clean Copy 

### of Rule 4565 3. Evidence of Public Hearing 4. Governing Board Resolution 5. ARB APCDIAQMD Rule Evaluation Form 6. Non-EPA Test Methods 7. Governing Board Memo 8. Staff Reportwith appendices, including Public Comments and District Responses. The Rule Action Package is being transn-~itted by e-mail to ARB staff. If you have any questions, please contact Sandra Lowe-Leseth at (559) 230-5833 or by e-mail at 

### sandra.loweleseth@vaIleyair.org. The District thanks you and your staff for your assistance. Sincerely,
Scott Nester Director of Planning Attachments

Northern Region Central Region (Main Office) Southern Region 4800 Enterprise Way 1990 E. Gettyshurg Avenue 2700 M Street, Suite 275 Modesto, CA 95356-8718 Fresno, CA 93726-0244 Bakersfield, CA 93301-2373 Tel: (209)557-6400 FAX: (209)557-6475 Tel: (559)230-6000 FAX: (559)230.6061 Tel: 1661)326-6900 FAX: (661)326-6985 www.valleyair.org Printedon recycled paper. 0
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gail P. Seneca, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Luminent MortgageCapital, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004     By: /s/ GAIL P. SENECA       Gail P. Seneca   Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4473 

To limit the definition of commercial in title 9, United States Code. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2024 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To limit the definition of commercial in title 9, United States 

Code. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AGREEMENT OR AWARD FALLING UNDER THE 

4 CONVENTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 202 of title 9, United 

6 States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by adding ‘‘as modified by section 1 of this 

8 title,’’ after ‘‘title,’’; and 

9 (2) by adding after the period at the end of the 

10 third sentence the following: ‘‘The entirety of section 

11 1 of this title, including all of the exemptions listed 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4473 IS

1 in section 1, shall apply to this chapter as if specifi2 cally set forth herein.’’. 

3 (b) INTENT OF CONGRESS.—It is the intent of Con4 gress that the definition of commercial in section 202 of 

5 title 9, United States Code, be limited by limiting the rela6 tionships described in section 2 of that title to those as 

7 modified by section 1 of that title, and incorporating the 

8 entirety of such section 1, including all of the exemptions 

9 in that section, into section 202 of that title. 

10 (c) RETROACTIVE EFFECT.—This Act shall apply to 

11 any action or proceeding that is pending on the date of 

12 enactment of this Act and any action or proceeding initi13 ated on or after such date of enactment. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Before the First Division,

September 7, 1949

No. 53531.

protests 117256-K, etc. (New York).

#### Griffon Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bottles the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Griffon Importing Co.*v. *United States*(36 C. C. P. A. 121, C. A.D. 408), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2006303EN.01002601.xml

| 13.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/26

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on given at its 408th meeting on 28 April 2006 concerning a draft decision relating to Case COMP/C.38.620 Hydrogen Peroxide and Perborate

(2006/C 303/19)

| (1) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the basic amounts of the fines.

| (2) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the increase of the basic amount due to aggravating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the increase of the basic amount due to aggravating circumstances.

| (3) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the reduction of the basic amount due to attenuating circumstances? |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the reduction of the basic amount due to attenuating circumstances?

| (4) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the amounts of reduction of the fine based on the 2002 Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines in cartel cases. A minority disagrees. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the amounts of reduction of the fine based on the 2002 Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines in cartel cases. A minority disagrees.

| (5) | The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines. A minority disagrees. |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The Advisory Committee agrees with the European Commission on the final amounts of the fines. A minority disagrees.

| (6) | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
**Delaware’s 1997 PM 2.5**  **Attainment Demonstration Plan -**  **MOVES Input and Output Files**

The file size of this document is greater than 50MB. Because of its unusually large size, this document is not available for download from www.regulations.gov . Copies of this document are available for public inspection at the EPA Region III address listed in the Federal Register Proposed Rules document. For further information, EPA Region III’s point of contact (POC) is listed in this docket. **Appendix A. 2012 MOVES Output and Input Files** Fuel Formation, pages 1 - 242 Fuel Supply, page 1 Road Ty pe Distribution, pages 1 -2 Vehicle Ty

pe VMT Year 2012, page 1 Vehicle Ty

pe VMT Monthly Fraction, pages 1 - 7 Vehicle Ty

pe VMT D ay

Fraction, pages 1 - 34 Vehicle Ty

pe VMT Hourly Fraction, pages 1 - 68 Meteorology

Data, pages 1 - 6 Age Distribution, pages 1 - 9 Source Ty

pe Population, page 1 NCC IM to be used, pages 1 - 3 Run Specs, pages 1 - 63 New Castle County

2012 MOVES Output, page 1 Speed Distribution Spring 2012, pages 1 - 908 Speed Distribution Fall 2012, pages 1 - 869 Speed Distribution Summer 2012, pages 1 - 869 Speed Distribution Winter 2012, pages 1 - 8692

**Appendix B. 2009 MOVES and 2009 MOBILE6 Input and Output File s**  Fuel Formation, pages 1 - 203 Fuel Supply, page 1 Road Ty pe Distribution, pages 1 -2 Vehicle Ty

pe VMT Year 2009, page 1 Vehicle Ty

pe VMT Monthly Fraction, pages 1 - 7 Vehicle Ty

pe VMT Day

Fraction, pages 1 - 34 Vehicle Ty

pe VMT Hourly Fraction, pages 1 - 68 Meteorology

Data, pages 1 - 6 Age Distribution, pages 1 - 9 Source Ty

pe Population, page 1 IM Program, pages 1 - 3 NCC IM to be used, pages 1 - 3 Run Specs, pages 1 -24 New Castle County

2009 MOVES Output, page 1 Speed Distribution Spring 20 09, pages 1 - 1289 Speed Distribution Fall 2012, pages 1 - 888 Speed Distribution Summer 2012, pages 1 - 1289 Speed Distribution Winter 2012, pages 1 - 888