alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1   PATIENT PORTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

     Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Kevin Kelly, President, and Director "principal executive officer") of
Patient Portal Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best
of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended June 30, 2006 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a)[15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.

Dated: 1/31/2007                          /s/ KEVIN KELLY
                                         ----------------------
                                         Kevin Kelly
                                         President and Director

















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 31

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Koss, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Koss Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

         a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 18, 2003

/s/ Michael J. Koss
--------------------------------------
Michael J. Koss
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chief Financial Officer
January 25, 1999	Management of Acne 	FAX to: 410-614-9878

	AHCPR Evidence Report

	Feedback Regarding Study Questions and Exclusions

Feedback from:	______________________________________________

			First Name				Last Name

Date:			_______________________

Number of pages (including this one): _______

Study Questions:

We have enclosed the study questions for this project.  These questions were developed based

upon a preliminary review of the evidence and feedback from our Partners and Technical

Experts.  Please provide comments regarding the study questions by writing on and faxing back

the page(s) with the questions and/or provide comments here:

Exclusions:

As outlined in deliverable 5a (enclosed), our literature search and review will be guided by the

study questions, and by inclusion and exclusion criteria.  We would like your confirmation that

we have made appropriate decisions, based upon previous feedback and the preliminary review,

regarding the exclusion criteria we have set.  

1.	In general, we feel that it is beyond the scope of this evidence report to examine endocrinopathies; to do so would necessitate an examination of underlying medical

conditions.  Do you agree that this report should focus on the management of acne in

patients whose exam and medical condition is otherwise normal?  (circle one)

	Yes	No	Comments: __________________________________________________

2.	We have set specific exclusions and include these below.

Please place a check beside those you agree should be excluded from this report:

❏	chloracne	❏	acne rosacea

❏	acne venanta	❏	acne fulminans

❏	acne necroticans	❏	acne agminata

Others?  Please specify:

❏	_________________________	

❏	_____________________________

Notes for study questions:

1.	Outcomes: Outcomes of interest include acne residual, quality of life, cost and other morbidities.  Sequelae of acne (acne residual) include scarring and hyperpigmentation.

2.	Treatment: Includes the following:

	I. Pharmaceutical interventions:	

		(i) FDA approved prescription drugs

		(ii) FDA approved OTC

		(iii) Alternative therapies

		(iv) Pharmaceutical treatments used outside of the United States

	II. Surgical interventions

3.	Patient Age:  We will include all ages in our search.  Where possible, we will stratify by age.  For instance, based on the preliminary literature review, we may stratify Tanner Stage

V by age (adolescents, young adults and older adults).

4.	Acne Severity

5.	Acne Type

6.	Patient Characteristics:  We have listed in the question, patient characteristics that appear to have an influence on the management of acne.  Insurance status of an individual may be

MCO, fee-for-service, no insurance and public assistance. 

7.	Source of care: Includes issue of variation of practice.

8.	Population outcomes

_____________________________________________________________________    _________________________________________

Note:  Study Questions are contained in See Appendix C for Study Questions.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **Certification
        Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 
 **As
        Adopted Pursuant To**
 
 **Section
        906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 I, Gary
        G.
        Brandt , Chief
        Executive Officer of
        Solomon Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 • the
        Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30,
        2006, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
        the
        date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
        or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 • the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
        presented therein.
 
 
 /s/
        Gary G. Brandt
 Gary
        G.
        Brandt
 Chief
        Executive Officer
 (principal
        executive officer)
 May
        15,
        2007
Notice: This opin ion is subject to form al revision before publication in the Atl antic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal

errors so that correc tions m ay be made before the boun d volum es go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF AP P EALS

No. 1 4- BG- 10 9

IN RE: GEORGE J. GEESING Res po nd en t. Reg is tra tio n No. 4 49 22 2 BDN: 4 58 -1 3

BEFORE: Tho m

ps on , Ass oc ia te Ju dg e, an d P ry or an d Neb ek er, Sen io r Ju dg es

.

ORDER (FILED - May 1, 20 14 )

O n c o n s id erat io n of th e cert ifi ed or de r of th e Co ur t of App eal s of Mar y l a n d

su sp en di ng res po nd en t fro m th e pr act ic e of la w in th at juri sd ic ti on fo r a pe rio d of 90 da y s, se e Att or ne

y Gri eva nc e Co m’n of Mar yl an d v

. G ees in g , 80 A.3d 71 8 (Md

. 20 13 ), th is co ur t’s Feb ru ary 12

, 20 14

, or de r su sp en di ng res po nd en t pe nd in g fu rth er act io n of th e co ur t an d di rect in g hi m to sh ow cau se why th e reci pr oc al di sc ip li ne of

a 90 -d ay su sp en si on sh ou ld no t be im po se d, an d t h e s t a te m en ts of Bar Co un se l

reg ard in g reci pr oc al di sc ip li ne , an d it ap pe ari ng th at res po nd en t fil ed an affi da vi t th at

sa ti sf ie s th e req ui rem en ts of D.C. Bar R. XI, §1 4 (g) and In re Gol db er g , 46 0 A.2 d 98 2 (D.C . 19 83 ), it is

ORDERED th at Geo rg e J. Geesi ng , is he reb y su sp en de d from th e pr act ic e of la w i n th e Dis tri ct of Co lu m bi a fo r a pe rio d of 9 0 d a ys n u n c pr o tu nc to Ja nu ary 2

, 20 14

. Se e In re Si bl ey , 9 90 A.2d 48 3 (D.C. 20 10 ), an d In re Fu ll er , 9 30 A.2d 19 4, 19 8 (D.C. 20 07 ) (reb ut ta bl e pr es um pt io n of id en ti cal reci pr oc al di sc ip li ne ap pl ie s to al l ca se s i n wh ic h t he res po nd en t d oe s n ot pa rti ci pa te ).

PER CURIAM
#### Keith A. BATTEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL REFRIGERATED PORT SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-1155.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 18, 2001.

*119Keith A. Batten, pro se. Kevin D. Holden, Spotts, Fain, Buis, Chappell & Anderson, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Keith A. Batten appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in his Title VTI suit for wrongful discrimination. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Batten v. International Refrigerated Port Servs.,*No. CA-00-499 (E.D.Va. Jan. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLESTAE A. TAGGART,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 127 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 7th day of August, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Case 2:04-cv-01709-MCE -CMK   Document 21    Filed 03/14/06   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-20T16:36:28-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TUTUILA F. TUVALU, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1724 DFL KJM P

vs.

JEANNE WOODFORD, et al, 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested extensions of time to file and serve a response to defendant

Sandoval’s motion to dismiss and to file and serve motions to compel discovery. On August 21,

2006, plaintiff filed four motions to compel and a response to the motion to dismiss. They will

be deemed timely filed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: August 22, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/bb

tuva1724.36

Case 2:04-cv-01724-JAM -KJM Document 94 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 49128.

#### Protest 701749-G of Samuels Hat Importing Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of hats known as harvest hats, similar in all material respects to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith the claim at only 25 percent was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Luna Innovations Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Dale E. Messick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ DALE E. MESSICK    
|Dale E. Messick        
|Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2009



42
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 12, 2022

No. 04-22-00124-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF P.R.D., A CHILD

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020PA02325

Honorable Kimberly Burley, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental 

rights. The disposition of this appeal is governed by the standards set forth in Rule 6.2 of the 

Texas Rules of Judicial Administration. TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. Accordingly, this appeal is 

required to be brought to final disposition within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal was 

filed. Id.

Appellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on April 11, 2022. On April 11, 2022, 

appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief. We ORDER that appellant’s brief 

must be filed no later than May 2, 2022. Given the time constraints governing the disposition 

of this appeal, no further extensions of time will be allowed.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
September 14, 1961

Reap. Dec. 10080.

#### National Carloading Corporation *v.*United States,

Motion by plaintiff.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD E. WILMSHURST, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0988 DFL KJM PS

vs.

BILL LOCKYER, Attorney General, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Defendants’ motion to dismiss is pending before the court. Plaintiff has requested

an opportunity to file supplemental briefing.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no later than July 15, 2005,

plaintiff and defendants each may file a supplemental brief addressing the application of 26

U.S.C. § 5848 to the pending motion. The matter thereafter will stand submitted. 

DATED: July 6, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

wilmshurst.sup

Case 2:04-cv-00988-DFL -KJM Document 70 Filed 07/06/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EZELL RAY ADAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1482 DFL PAN P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 3, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and

recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the

findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-01482-DFL-PAN Document 18 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 3, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

DATED: 8/22/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01482-DFL-PAN Document 18 Filed 08/23/05 Page 2 of 2
# ***Exhibit 32.2***

# * *

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of CHAAS Acquisitions, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald J. Gardhouse, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, asadopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)    Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|    /s/ Ronald J. Gardhouse |   |
|--------------------------------------|--------|
| Ronald J. Gardhouse                  |
| Chief Financial Officer              |
| (Principal Financial Officer)        |
| May 12, 2004                         |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet Security Systems, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, the Senior Vice President Finance and Administration and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certifies that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2)   The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
| /s/ RAGHAVAN RAJAJI                        |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Raghavan Rajaji                            |   |   |
| Senior Vice President Finance and          |   |   |
| Administration and Chief Financial Officer |   |   |
|                                       |   |   |
| August 4 , 2006                            |   |   |

 

----
**SANDEE BRYAN** **MARION CHIEF** **JUSTICE KAREN** **ANGELINI MARIALYN** **BARNARD REBECA** **MARTINEZ PATRICIA** **O. ALVAREZ** **LUZ ELENA** **D.CHAPA JASON** **PULLtAM JUSTICES** 

## COURT**OF APPEALS** **FOURTl COURT** **OF APPEALS DISTRICT** **CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE** **CENTER 300** **DOLOROSA, SUITE** **320(1 SAN** **ANTONIO. TEXAS** **78205-3037 WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX** **May 20,** **2015 KEITH** **E. HOTTLE** **CLERK OF** **COURT TELEPHONE** **(210)335-2635 FACSIMILE** **NO. (210)335-2762** **Randall Smidt** **Harris County** **Attorney's Office** **1019 Congress Street.** **Floor 15** **Houston, TX** **77002-1799 Matthew** **Tepper 700** **Jeffrey Way.** **Suite 100** **Round Rock.** **TX 78665** **James S.** **Frost Law** **Office of** **James S.** **Frost 113** **WGonzales Street** **Seguin.TX 78155-5630** **RE: Court of** **Appeals Number:** 

### Style:**04-15-00279-CV Abdul** **H. Nubaili** **V. County** **of Guadalupe** **and Randall** **R. Smidt** 

### Dear**Counsel: After** **reviewing the** **parlies' addendums** **to the** **Civil Docketing** **Statement in** **the above** **numbered and** **styled appeal,** **the court** **has determined** **that this** **dispute is** **appropriate for** **referral**

### to**an Alternative** **Dispute Resolution** **(ADR) procedure.** **See TEX.** **Civ. PraC.** **REM. Code** **ANN. 154.021** **(Vernon 2(105).** **The court** **intends to** **order the** **parlies to** **mediate after** **the court** 

### determines**that it** **has jurisdiction** **to consider** **the appeal** **upon our** **receipt of** **the clerk's** **record. The** **court encourages** **the parties** **to proceed** **to mediation** **prior to** **being ordered** **to do** **so. If** **the parties** **agree to** **mediate, the** **parties should** **notify Margaret** **Adams, the** **court's legal** 

### assistant**in charge** **of ADR.** **The court** **will entertain** **request to** **extend the** **appellate deadline** **for filing** **the reporter's** **record to** **enable the** **parties to** **concentrate on** **the scheduling** **and completion** **of the** **mediation process.** **Any communications** **regarding mediation** **should be** **directed to** **Margaret Adams,** **(210) 335-3854.** **On behalf** **of the** **entire Court.** **thank you** **for your** **cooperation in this** **matter. Very** **truly yours.** **MB.'iua**
Exhibit 32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of m-Wise, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Shay Ben-Asulin,
Chairman of the Board and Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to my knowledge:


            (1) the Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


            (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Shay Ben-Asulin
---------------------------------
Shay Ben-Asulin, Chairman


Dated: November 14, 2005