alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
10.1.35





Discretionary
Bonus Agreement





This
Agreement is entered into effective as of May 5, 2009, by and between Great
Plains Energy Incorporated (the “Company”) and Barbara B. Curry (the
“Executive”).





WHEREAS,
the independent members of the Board of Directors of the Company on May 5, 2009,
authorized the payment of certain discretionary cash bonuses (the “Bonuses) to
the Executive; and





WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive wish to memorialize the terms and conditions of
the Bonuses.





NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, and of other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
Company and the Executive agree as follows:





1.  Payment of
Bonuses.  The Company shall pay the Executive a Bonus of
$77,500 in cash, less all applicable employment, payroll and other withholdings,
on each of February 10, 2010 and February 10, 2011.





2.  Payment Not Conditioned On
Continued Employment.  Except as set forth in this Agreement,
the Company’s obligation to pay the Bonuses is absolute, and is not conditioned
on the Executive’s continued employment with the Company.





3.  Bonuses Subject to
Reimbursement Obligations.  Executive acknowledges that awards
under the Company’s Annual Incentive Plan and Long-Term Incentive Plan (the
“Plans”) are subject to reimbursement if and to the extent the awards reflected
the achievement of financial results that were subsequently the subject of a
restatement, or the achievement of other objectives that were subsequently found
to be inaccurately measured, and a lower award would have occurred based on the
restated financial results or inaccurately measured
objectives.  Executive further acknowledges that in the event the
Executive is required to reimburse the Company for awards under the Plans, the
Company may, among other actions it may take in its discretion, reduce or
eliminate the amount of the Bonuses payable to Executive as may be required to
satisfy Executive’s reimbursement obligations.




4.  Choice of
Law.  This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the
laws of the State of Missouri. Any dispute relating to this Agreement shall be
brought in an appropriate Circuit Court of Missouri or the U.S. District Court
for the Western District of Missouri.






5.  Entire
Agreement.  This Agreement contains the entire agreement
between the Executive and Company concerning the foregoing matters and no
change, modification, or waiver of any provision hereof will be valid unless in
writing and signed by the parties to be bound.




[signature
page follows]











In
witness whereof, the Company and the Executive have signed this Agreement as of
the date first written above.








Great
      Plains Energy Incorporated
            ExecutiveBy:________________________
            ___________________________Michael
      J. Chesser
            Barbara
      B. CurryChairman
      of the Board andChief
      Executive Officer
Before the Third Division,

April 8, 1948

No. 52261.

protests 61892-K, etc. (New York).

#### H. W. Baker Linen Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Reset an LVD

To reset a Local Verification Database (LVD), complete the following steps:

1. From the Check Processing tab, select Manage Verification>Reset LVD. The Review 

LVD Reset page appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Reset LVD

• The Reset LVD function removes everything on the LVD in anticipation of a full 

replacement with new LVD records. If an LVD is reset without downloading the new 

LVD, the verification of the checks presented does not occur.

• Resetting the LVD is a mandatory step for agencies upgrading from a pre-1.3.2 

OTCnet Offline Check Capture software version to a 1.3.2 OTCnet Offline Check 

Capture software version or above.

• Before resetting an LVD, you must log in using the OTCnet Offline icon on your 

terminal’s desktop or access your Start Menu under Programs and enter your 

credentials. Internet connection is not required to reset an LVD.

2. Click Submit. The LVD Reset dialog box appears.

3. Click Submit. A Confirmation page appears stating that the verification records are deleted.

Click Return Home to the OTCnet Home Page.

Application Tips

Additional Button
****U. S. Department of Health and Human Services****U.S. Food & Drug Administration****C**enter for**F**ood**S**afety &**A**pplied**N**utrition**DietarySupplements**Skip navigation **Contents**
**Overview**
**Warnings and Safety Information**
**Adverse Event Reporting**
**Announcements & Meetings**
**General Information**
**Industry Information & Regulations**
**Questions & Answers**
**Other Sources of Information****Adverse Event Reporting**
Report a Problem  |  CFSAN Adverse Event Reporting System  |  Report Unlawful Sales on the Internet
**Report an Illness or InjuryAssociated With a Dietary Supplement**
FDA can be contacted to report general complaints or concerns aboutfood products, including dietary supplements. You maytelephone or write to FDA.
If you think you have suffered a serious harmful effect or illness froma dietary supplement, your health care provider can report this bycalling FDA's MedWatch hotline at 1-800-FDA-1088 or using thewebsite http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/report/hcp.htm. TheMedWatch program allows health care providers to reportproblems possibly caused by FDA-regulated products such asdrugs, medical devices, medical foods and dietary supplements.The identity of the patient is kept confidential.
Consumers may also report an adverse event or illness they believeto be related to the use of a dietary supplement by calling FDA at1-800-FDA-1088 or using the websitehttp://www.fda.gov/medwatch/report/consumer/consumer.htm.FDA would like to know when a product causes a problem even if youare unsure the product caused the problem or even if you do notvisit a doctor or clinic.
**CFSAN Adverse Event Reporting System**- Letter to Stakeholders:Announcing CAERS - the CFSAN Adverse Event Reporting System   August 29, 2002 Special Nutritionals Adverse Event Monitoring SystemWebsite Removed August 29, 2002
**Unlawful Sales of Dietary Supplements on the Internet**- ReportingUnlawful Sales of Medical Products on the Internet  (includes foods and dietary supplements)           Dietary Supplements    Foods Home  |  FDA Home  |  HHS Home  |  Search/Subject Index  |  Disclaimers & Privacy Policy  |  Accessibility/HelpHypertext updated by dms/cjm/kwg 2003-MAR-13   
 
 
 

**
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Audit Committee

Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation 

180 Van Riper Avenue 

Elmwood Park, NJ 07407 

We hereby consent to the use of our report dated September 22, 2005, except for thereclassification paragraph in Note A as to which the date is December 23, 2005; on the consolidated balance sheets of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and on the related consolidated statements ofoperations, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the years then ended in the annual Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006. Such report is being included in the unaudited financial informationprepared by management in documents filed by Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

**/s/ Gregory,Sharer & Stuart, P.A.**

St. Petersburg, Florida 

September 26, 2006 

 

42
Exhibit 12.2

# KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT
COMPANY

# COMPUTATION OF RATIO
OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|2003                               
|
|(Thousands)                        
|Income from continuing operations  
|before cumulative effect of changes
|in accounting principle            
|Add:                               
|Equity investment (income) loss    
|Minority interests in subsidiaries 
|                                   
|Income subtotal                    
|                                   
|                                   
|Add:                               
|Taxes on income                    
|Kansas City earnings tax           
|                                   
|Total taxes on income              
|                                   
|                                   
|Interest on value of leased        
|property                           
|Interest on long-term debt         
|Interest on short-term debt        
|Mandatorily redeemable Preferred   
|Securities                         
|Other interest expense             
|and amortization                   
|                                   
|                                   
|Total fixed charges                
|                                   
|                                   
|Earnings before taxes on           
|income and fixed charges           
|                                   
|                                   
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges 
|
Environmental Quality, Dept of 

Agencywide Program Unit Summary Versio2011-13 Biennium

Summary Cross Reference Number

2011-13

Agency

Request

Budget

2009-11 Leg

Approved

Budget

2009-11 Leg

Adopted

Budget

2007-09

Actuals

Cross Reference Description

001-00-00-00000 Air Quality

General Fund 9,557,999 7,768,464 7,633,053 8,249,664 Other Funds 31,479,705 38,514,722 38,514,722 42,977,675 Federal Funds 4,897,199 7,447,395 7,447,395 8,781,418 

All Funds 45,934,903 53,730,581 53,595,170 60,008,757 

002-00-00-00000 Water Quality

General Fund 19,407,897 19,314,798 19,126,500 21,364,985 Lottery Funds 5,610,171 5,426,117 5,415,717 5,632,937 Other Funds 17,714,771 21,168,587 21,165,014 22,053,405 Federal Funds 10,606,019 12,049,066 12,049,066 12,538,370 

All Funds 53,338,858 57,958,568 57,756,297 61,589,697 

003-00-00-00000 Land Quality

General Fund 2,091,894 995,736 967,313 1,925,335 Other Funds 46,356,874 55,581,888 55,581,888 56,407,864 Federal Funds 10,473,867 15,408,604 15,408,604 11,337,457 

All Funds 58,922,635 71,986,228 71,957,805 69,670,656 

004-00-00-00000 Agency Management

Other Funds 20,666,415 21,249,534 21,249,534 23,338,013 

_____ Agency Request _____ Governor's Recommended 

2011-13 Biennium Page __________ Agen
Environmental Quality, Dept of 

Agencywide Program Unit Summary Versio2011-13 Biennium

Summary Cross Reference Number

2011-13

Agency

Request

Budget

2009-11 Leg

Approved

Budget

2009-11 Leg

Adopted

Budget

2007-09

Actuals

Cross Reference Description

005-00-00-00000 Cross-Media

General Fund 674,001 658,776 658,776 742,324 Other Funds 354,164 149,645 149,645 171,191 Federal Funds 475,422 1,030,249 1,030,249 1,127,660 

All Funds 1,503,587 1,838,670 1,838,670 2,041,175 

008-00-00-00000 Non-Limited

Other Funds 133,527,390 174,778,200 174,778,200 110,225,000 

009-00-00-00000 PCBF Debt Service

General Fund 4,712,840 4,592,353 4,592,353 5,573,180 Other Funds 4,643,292 15,492,548 15,492,548 16,388,801 

All Funds 9,356,132 20,084,901 20,084,901 21,961,981 

TOTAL AGENCY

General Fund 36,444,631 33,330,127 32,977,995 37,855,488 Lottery Funds 5,610,171 5,426,117 5,415,717 5,632,937 Other Funds 254,742,611 326,935,124 326,931,551 271,561,949 Federal Funds 26,452,507 35,935,314 35,935,314 33,784,905 

All Funds 323,249,920 401,626,682 401,260,577 348,835,279 

_____ Agency Request _____ Governor's Recommended 

2011-13 Biennium Page __________ Agen
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Trey Resources, Inc. ("the
Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I,
Mark Meller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge
and belief, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                        Date: June 9, 2004


                                        By /s/ Mark Meller
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark Meller
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer and Director
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN MENZIES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1009 DFL KJM PS

vs.

MARY MUSE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees came on regularly for hearing on May 25,

2005 before the undersigned. Plaintiff appeared in propria persona. Franklin Gumpert appeared

for defendants El Dorado County Grand Jury, Warren, Lacy, Roth, Brunner and Gumpert. Upon

review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of plaintiff and 

counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within seven days from the date of this order, defense counsel shall submit for

in camera review the billing records pertaining to this action.

2. Within seven days from the date of this order, defendants shall submit

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01009-DFL -KJM Document 79 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

evidence regarding the prevailing rates for defense counsel in the Eastern District performing

work similar to the defense of the instant action.

DATED: May 26, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

menzies.oah

Case 2:04-cv-01009-DFL -KJM Document 79 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 56414.

protests 166987-K, etc. (New York).

#### J. Eisenberg, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
July 29, 2015

ID: FAA-2015-0953-000

United States Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012

Dear Sir or Madam:

In response to you letter dated July 2, 2015, we wish to provide you the following 

information as per your request. 

The specific reasons we seek relief is to operate in the following areas of commerce:

1. Closed Set Filming

 Our MPTOM is outlined in the documents we provided in our original exemption 

request. Please refer to the two published documents labeled:

A. Seminole Club, Inc. d/b/a Flatwater Studios – UAV Flight Operations Manual

B. Seminole Club, Inc. d/b/a Flatwater Studios – Preflight Checklist

2. Geographical Mapping

3. Agricultural Mapping and Analysis

4. Real Estate Photography and Video

5. General Aerial Photography and Video

In addition, we are providing to you all of the Release forms we currently use in out film 

and photography operations. 

We hope this information helps clear up any concerns the FAA has toward our approval 

process. If more information is needed, we are always available to provide to your office 

any and all requested documentation. Thank you for you time and consideration.

Sincerely,
Curt Daniels

Seminole Club, Inc.

DBA: Flatwater Studios

709 West Park Ave

Suite D

Edgewater, FL 32132
(Reap. Dec. 8667)

Entry No. 74580.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 10, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the export value of the merchandise at the time of exportation to the United States covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above, with the exception of the metal triple bicycle horns in case T4370, at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less additions made to meet the advances by the Appraiser in similar cases covering the non-dutiable so-called (F. O. B.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling and lighterage added by the importer on entry.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, except the metal triple bicycle horns in case T4370, and that such value was the appraised value, less additions made to meet the advances by the appraiser in similar cases covering the nondutiable so-called (f. o. b.) charges for inland freight, insurance premium, storage, hauling, and lighterage, added by the importer on entry.

Insofar as the appeal relates to the metal triple bicycle horns in case T4370, it is hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3699]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

(A-549-817)


Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from Thailand: 
Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 2, 2007

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Bailey or Dena Crossland, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0193 or (202) 482-3362, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 8, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the 
Department'') published the preliminary results of the administrative 
review of the antidumping duty order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel 
flat products (``hot-rolled steel'') from Thailand covering the period 
November 1, 2004, through October 31, 2005. See Certain Hot-Rolled 
Carbon Steel Flat Products From Thailand; Preliminary Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission in Part, 71 FR 
65458 (November 8, 2006). The final results for the antidumping duty 
administrative review of hot-rolled steel from Thailand are currently 
due no later than March 8, 2007.

Extension of Time Limits for Final Results of Review

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the 
Act''), requires the Department to issue the final results within 120 
days after the date on which the preliminary results are published. 
However, if it is not practicable to complete the review within that 
time period, section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act allows the Department to 
extend the time limit of the final results to 180 days from the date of 
publication of the preliminary results.
    Due to the complexity of the affiliation issue present in this 
administrative review, as well as the demands of other proceedings 
handled by the office administering this review, the Department has 
determined that it is not practicable to complete this review within 
the original time period. Accordingly, the Department is extending the 
time for completion of the final results to 180 days from the 
publication date of the preliminary results, until no later than May 7, 
2007, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: February 23, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-3699 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC FORM 10K
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                       3,673,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,533,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                    42,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,402,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,240,000
<PP&E>                                      12,742,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,898,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,137,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,025,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       750,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     842,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,137,000
<SALES>                                     76,465,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            76,465,000
<CGS>                                       73,176,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               80,250,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,821,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,509,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,312,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,312,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.08)
        

</TABLE>