alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
} . 

SERVED: SEPTEMBER 24, 2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

CEBU AIR INC., 

d/b/a 

Cebu Pacific Air, Inc. 

DOCKET NO. FAA 2014-0414 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

Respondent filed a Request to withdraw Request for Hearing dated September 12,2014. 

14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney 

may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the 

consent of the administrative law judge. If an agency attorney withdraws the complaint or 

a pmiy withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative law judge 

shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." 

WHEREFORE, Respondent's Request to withdraw Request for Hearing having been 

read and considered it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing be and is hereby granted; and 

2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

·······':;··· 

"! . . • ... ;~/.~ -~· ...... " 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

ONE COPY 

Lance Y. Gokongwei, President/CEO 

CEBU Air, Inc. (CEBU PACIFIC), Respondent 

8006 Airline Operations Center 

Domestic Road, Pasay City Philippines 13 01 

TEL: +632-854-0226 

Rick Feller, President 

U-FREIGHT AMERICA, INC. 

320 Corey Way 

San Francisco, CA 94080 

TEL: 650-583-6527 

Carey Terasaki, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, APW-7.1 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Western-Pacific Region 

PO Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7108 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0414 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W ., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W I 000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. · 

2
Part 1, Section VI: USSGL Crosswalks to Reclassified 

Statements

This section includes crosswalks for use in Fiscal Year 2022 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map 

USSGL accounts to external reports in accordance with TFM Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 4700, Federal 

Entity Reporting Requirements for the Financial Report of the United States Government. Each report 

crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or column on the 

reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This subsidiary 

information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional information 

on attributes.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by 

Fiscal Service:

Section VI Page Number

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Balance Sheet (RBS) VI RBS - 1

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Net Cost (RSNC) VI RSNC - 1

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Operations and 

Changes in Net Position (RSOCNP)

VI RSOCNP - 1

Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL LENIOR SMITH,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1594 LKK DAD P

vs.

WARDEN T. FELKER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has requested that this civil rights

action be dismissed. Defendants have filed a statement of non-opposition to voluntary dismissal

of the action without prejudice. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), plaintiff’s request will be

granted.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s October 7, 2005 request for voluntary dismissal is granted;

2. Plaintiff’s applications, requests, and motions filed April 19, 2005 (#16 and

#18); May 4, 2005 (#21 and #23); June 23, 2005 (#27); July 13, 2005 (#29); and August 31, 2005

(#34) are denied as moot;

3. Defendants’ August 29, 2005 request for extension of time (#32) is denied as

moot; and

Case 2:04-cv-01594-LKK -DAD Document 40 Filed 10/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

4. This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED: October 21, 2005.

DAD:13

smit1594.59

Case 2:04-cv-01594-LKK -DAD Document 40 Filed 10/21/05 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

April 28, 1960

No. 64129.

protest 59/27489 (New York).

#### “21” Brands, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.1



AMENDMENT NO. 14
TO THE
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
NUCLEAR FACILITIES QUALIFIED CPUC DECOMMISSIONING
MASTER TRUST AGREEMENT
FOR
SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATIONS




This Amendment No. 14 made this 18th day of February, 2016, by and between San Diego Gas & Electric Company (“Company”) and The Bank of New York Mellon, a New York state bank, successor by operation of law to Mellon Bank, N.A (“Trustee”).
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.12 of the Nuclear Facilities Qualified Decommissioning Master Trust for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Stations dated as of June 29, 1992, as amended (“Agreement”) between the Company and the Trustee, the parties specifically reserve the right to amend the Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Company and the Trustee agree as follows:
		
	1.
	Effective as of March 1, 2016, the Fee Schedule attached as Exhibit C to the Agreement shall be amended by deleting the fee description set forth under the title of “Manual activity charge” in its entirety and replacing it with the following:


“Manual Intervention* where automated solution exists (in addition to transaction fee)    $100.00
*Manual Intervention is defined as transactions not being transmitted to BNY Mellon electronically via standard SWIFT/ISO formatted messages (including instructions that require repair) following SMPG and ISITC best practices, or, via Workbench, our secure, on-line transaction and reporting system.”
		
	2.
	Each Party hereby represents and warrants to the others that it has full authority to enter into this Amendment No. 14 upon the terms and conditions hereof and that the individual executing this Amendment No. 14 on its behalf has the requisite authority to bind that Party.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company, the Trustee, and the California Public Utilities Commission have set their hands and seals in agreement to these amendments as of the latest date set forth below.




SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY




		
	By:
	________________________________________




		
	Date:
	________________________________________




		
	Attest:
	________________________________________






THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON




		
	By:
	________________________________________




		
	Date:
	________________________________________




		
	Attest:
	________________________________________






CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION




		
	By:
	________________________________________




		
	Date:
	________________________________________




		
	Attest:
	________________________________________
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/ A (1) for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas Hagan, Acting Financial Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 6, 2009


                                             /s/ Thomas Hagan
                                             Thomas Hagan
                                             Acting Chief Financial Officer



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 48498.

#### Protests 56365-K, etc., of Geo. Borgfeldt Corp. et al. (Philadelphia, etc.).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Sitestar Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Frank Erhartic, Jr., Chief Executive Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Frank Erhartic, Jr.

Frank Erhartic, Jr.,

Chief Executive Officer, President,

and Chief Financial Officer



Dated:  May 19, 2003
**MEMORANDUM**

**DATE:** 7/29/15 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013 -0602 **SUBJECT:** Discussion of the Clean Power Plan at the DOE WINDExchange Summit **SUMMARY :**  Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan at the DOE WINDExchange Summit in Cocoa, FL, on May 18, 2015 . The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Ken Mitchell /EPA R4 **External Stakeholders** Steve Clemmer, Union of Concerned Scientists Brian O’Hara, Southeastern Wind Coalition Approximately 30 other participants, including various DOE staff (Brie Vanc leve – organizer) **ATTACHMENT**Follow - up answers to meeting participants’ questions provided by Ken

Mitchell/EPA Region 4 to Tom Parker/API Southern Region via email on 5/27/15.
1. **Is methane regulated as a VOC?** This question was raised in the context of our discussion of ozone regulations. In that context, the term "VOC - Volatile Organi c Compounds" is defined in 40 CFR 51.100(s) as follows: “(s) Volatile organic compounds (VOC) means any compound of carbon, excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, carbonic acid, metallic carbides or carbonates, and ammonium carbonate, which participa tes in atmospheric photochemical reactions. (1) This includes any such organic compound **other than the following** , which have been determined to have negligible photochemical reactivity: **methane** ; ethane...” (Emphasis added)
2. **Are additional refinery regulations in the works or anticipated?**  From the conversation at the Charleston API meeting, I understood this to be specifically related to a greenhouse gas (GHG) rule for refineries pursuant to a 2010 settlement agreement between EPA and various petiti oners (see: http://www2.epa.gov/carbon
- pollution - standards/2010
- proposed - settlement- agreements - address - greenhouse - gas - emiss ions ). The Agency is focused on finalizing the proposed Clean Power Plan . **3. When were the current ozone implementation standards completed?**  There are two main rules related to implementing the 2008 ozone NAAQS. The first (the Classification Rule) was i ssued on April 30, 2012. The second (the SIP Requirements Rule) was issued on February 13, 2015 (see: http://epa.gov/airquality/ozonepollution/actions.html#impl ). Note that implementation activities undertaken to meet the 2008 ozone NAAQS are expected to help many areas make progress toward meeting any future revised ozone standards. On November 25, 2014, the EPA proposed tostrengthen the ozone NAAQS in order to ensure that the standards meet

the requirements of the CAA. The EPA will complete that proposed rulemaking by October 1, 2015. In the event EPA takes final action to revise the current (2008) NAAQS, EPA would issue a new implementation rule specific to that future revised NAAQS.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Cyco.net,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

            1.    The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.



                       By:  /s/ Daniel Urrea               August 20, 2004
                            -----------------------
                       Daniel Urrea
                       Chief Financial Officer
No. 47828.

#### Protest 77562-K of A. D. Cohen Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the hats or hoods in question are not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, not blocked or trimmed, and that they are similar to those involved in Abstract 47291, the claim at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
No. 46693.

#### Protests 986017-G, etc., of Wm. J. Jones & Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protests were sustained to that extent.
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB / A (2) for the period ended June 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Kevin Kelly, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 6, 2009

                                         /s/ Kevin Kelly
                                         Kevin Kelly
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4468 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4468

To prohibit the use of Federal funds to finalize, implement, or enforce 
 the interim final rule of the Bureau of Industry and Security of the 
    Department of Commerce entitled ``Revision of Firearms License 
                            Requirements''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2024

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of Federal funds to finalize, implement, or enforce 
 the interim final rule of the Bureau of Industry and Security of the 
    Department of Commerce entitled ``Revision of Firearms License 
                            Requirements''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop the Bureaucratic Ineptitude 
Shuttering Respectable and Upstanding Lawful Exporters Act'' or the 
``Stop the BIS RULE Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FEDERAL FUNDS TO FINALIZE, IMPLEMENT, OR 
              ENFORCE PROPOSED RULE OF BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY.

    No Federal funds may be obligated or expended to finalize, 
implement, or enforce the interim final rule of the Bureau of Industry 
and Security of the Department of Commerce entitled ``Revision of 
Firearms License Requirements'' and published in the Federal Register 
on April 30, 2024 (Docket No. 240419-0113; 89 Fed. Reg. 34680).
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES DIGAETANO,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1445 FCD CMK

vs.

LORI DICARLO, et al., 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 27, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

Although it appears from the file that petitioner's copy of the findings and

recommendations were returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner's

responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local

Rule 83-182(d), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.

Case 2:04-cv-01445-FCD-CMK Document 6 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 27, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. The action is dismissed.

DATED:July 14, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01445-FCD-CMK Document 6 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

October 23, 1951

No. 55937.

protest 151559-K (St. Louis).

#### B. Herder Book Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entry for the date of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entry and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entry are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoice should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949. .
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 8.1

<PAGE>

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

     The table below sets forth certain of our subsidiaries, the names under
which they do business, and their jurisdictions of establishment as of the date
of this annual report.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                          Jurisdiction of
Name of Company                                                                            Establishment
---------------                                                                            -------------
<S>                                                                                       <C>
Sercotel, S.A. de C.V. .................................................................  Mexico
    Inmobiliaria los Cantaros, S.A. de C.V. ............................................  Mexico
    AM Treasury, LLC ...................................................................  Delaware
    Radiomovil Dipsa, S.A. de C.V. (Telcel).............................................  Mexico
        SubDipsa Treasury LLC ..........................................................  Delaware
    TracFone Wireless, Inc. (TracFone) .................................................  Florida
    Occidente y Caribe Celular S.A. (Occel) ............................................  Colombia
    Comunicacion Celular S.A. (Comcel) .................................................  Colombia
    Telecomunicaciones de Guatemala, S.A. (Telgua) .....................................  Guatemala
        Servicios de Comunicaciones Personales Inalambricas, S.A. (Sercom) .............  Guatemala
    Speedy Movil, S.A. de C.V. (Speedy Movil) ..........................................  Mexico
    Consorcio Ecuatoriano de Telecomunicaciones, S.A. CONECEL (Conecel) ................  Ecuador
    Techtel--LMDS Comunicaciones Interactivas, S.A. (Techtel) ..........................  Argentina
    Telstar, S.A. (Telstar) ............................................................  Uruguay
    Telecom Americas Ltd. (Telecom Americas) ...........................................  Bermuda
        ATL--Algar Telecom Leste S.A. (ATL) ............................................  Brazil
        Tess S.A. (Tess) ...............................................................  Brazil
        Americel S.A. (Americel) .......................................................  Brazil
        Telet S.A. (Telet) .............................................................  Brazil
</TABLE>