alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.






Date:January
                18, 2007
            By:
            */s/
                John B. Gallagher*Name:John
                B. GallagherTitle:Co-Chief Executive OfficerDate:January
                18, 2007
            By:
            */s/
                Harry D. Shields*Name:Harry
                D. ShieldsTitle:Co-Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




EXHIBIT
          32.1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LUE LEE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1277 DFL CMK P

vs.

C. W. HARRISON,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 10, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

Case 2:04-cv-01277-DFL-CMK Document 8 Filed 09/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 There is a typographical error at page 3, l. 4; “May 16, 2003" should be “May 16, 1

2004.” The error does not affect the analysis.

2

proper analysis.

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 10, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. Respondent’s motion to dismiss filed October 14, 2004, be granted.

DATED: 9/9/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01277-DFL-CMK Document 8 Filed 09/12/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      Exhibit 23

23. Consent of experts

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-2496) of Keithley Instruments, Inc. of our report
dated November 23, 1998 appearing on page 32 of the Annual Report to
Shareholders which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the
Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on page 18 of this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cleveland, Ohio
December 21, 1998
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES TAYLOR MURRAY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1367 MCE GGH P

vs.

H.D.S.P. MEDICAL CARE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On November 23, 2005, defendants filed a motion to compel. Plaintiff did not file

an opposition. Accordingly, on May 3, 2006, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause within ten

days why defendants’ motion should not be granted. Ten days passed and plaintiff did not

respond to this order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ November 23, 2005, motion to compel is granted;

2. Within twenty days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall provide defendants

with supplemental responses to the discovery requests described in the motion to compel.

DATED: 6/28/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 murr1367.com UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01367-MCE -GGH Document 53 Filed 06/28/06 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v DEAN A. WARBORG, Airman Apprentice, U. S. Navy, Appellant

16 USCMA 32, 36 CMR 188

No. 19,086

February 11, 1966

*Commander Walter F. Brown,*USN, was on the brief for Appellant, Accused.

*Major Paul F. Henderson, Jr.,*USMC, was on the brief for Appellee, United States.

*33Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

At his trial by special court-martial, the accused pleaded guilty to three specifications of absence without leave and one specification of larceny of various Government tools. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for six months, forfeiture of $50.00 per month for six months, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade.

During the formal convening procedures, trial counsel inquired of the court members whether they were aware of any fact which would constitute a ground for challenge against them. Two members replied in the affirmative and recounted information, personally known to them, regarding at least three prior separate offenses, each of which was apparently not involved in this ease. The two members were excused from sitting by the president of the court. Despite these disclosures, however, trial counsel informed the court, at the appropriate place in the trial, that he had no evidence of prior convictions. Under these circumstances, it is obvious that the remaining court members were improperly made aware of information regarding other acts of misconduct by the accused. No instruction limiting the court’s consideration of these matters was given by the president. The effect of such disclosures, under these circumstances, is “a harvest of harm” to be reaped by the accused. United States v Richard, 7 USCMA 46, 51, 21 CMR 172.

The defect, however, goes only to the sentence for the accused by his plea of guilty obviated the need for the members to resolve the issue of guilt or innocence. United States v Lucas, 1 USCMA 19, 1 CMR 19.

We take a contrary view, however, with regard to the effect it’ may have had on the sentence. The purpose of receiving evidence of previous convictions after findings of guilty have been announced is to afford the court-martial information concerning accused’s prior criminal record and, in some instances, to allow the imposition of permissible additional punishments. United States v Kiger, 13 USCMA 522, 33 CMR 54. In this case, trial counsel announced he had no such evidence. Nevertheless, the court members were aware, by reason of the above-indicated admissions of two of their former members, that the accused had previously been guilty of misconduct of a nature at least serious enough *to*disqualify these members from passing judgment and sentence on the present charges. What weight this had on their deliberations, we cannot say, but we believe it sufficiently serious to require a rehearing on sentence by the triers of fact. United States v Beach, 15 USCMA 119, 35 CMR 91.

The decision of the board of review as to the sentence is set aside. The record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of the Navy. A rehearing on sentence may be ordered.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Edward A. Stern, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;

b) [Intentionally omitted].

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,
whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers internal control over financial reporting.



|                                         |  |  |  |                         
|---------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------
|/s/ Edward A. Stern                      |  |  |  |                         
|Edward A. Stern, Chief Financial Officer |  |  |  | Date: September 29, 2008
|(Principal Financial Officer)            |  |  |  |
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-3844

_____________________________

LARRY G. JOSSEY, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

David M. Gooding, Judge.

January 11, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Larry G. Jossey, Jr., pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bliss
Essentials Corp. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard Gelfand,
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.



Date:  May 10, 2004           /s/ Howard Gelfand
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Financial Officer of
                              Bliss Essentials Corp., Registrant











<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          19,221
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,088
<INVENTORY>                                        207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,163
<PP&E>                                           9,072
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,511
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,899
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           168
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,096
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,325
<SALES>                                          3,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,883
<CGS>                                              268
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,837
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,672
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,349)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,349)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.20)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10301]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3943]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Art Advisory Panel--Notice of Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Closed Meeting of Art Advisory Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in 
Washington, DC

DATES: The meeting will be held September 20 and 21, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on 
September 20 and 21, 2007, in Room 4136 beginning at 9:30 a.m., 
Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Carolan, C:AP:ART, 1099 14th 
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. Telephone (202) 435-5609 (not a toll 
free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a 
closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on September 20 
and 21, 2007, in Room 4136 beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court 
Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.
    The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the 
acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved 
in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the 
discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by 
the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103.
    A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned 
with matters listed in section 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), and that 
the meeting will not be open to the public.

Karen S. Ammons,
Deputy Chief, Appeals.
[FR Doc. E7-3943 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without *

oral argument. L.R. 78-230(h).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS ENGRAHM, )

) 02:04-cv-1290-GEB-GGH

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER*

v. )

)

COUNTY OF COLUSA, COUNTY OF COLUSA )

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, JOHN )

S. WRYSINSKI, individually and in )

his capacity as Director of County )

of Colusa Dept. of Public Works, )

DONALD F. STANTON, individually )

and in his capacity as legal )

counsel to County of Colusa, DAVID )

J. Shoemaker, individually and in )

his capacity as CAO/Personnel )

Director of Colusa County Dept. of )

Public Works, )

)

Defendants. )

)

On January 30, 2006, Defendants John S. Wrysinski, Donald F.

Stanton, and David J. Shoemaker (collectively “Defendants”) moved for

an order staying these proceedings until the Ninth Circuit decides

their appeal. The motion concerns Defendants’ Notice of Appeal filed

January 13, 2006, in which they challenge this Court’s denial of their

motion for summary judgment. Defendants argue that because their

Case 2:04-cv-01290-GEB-GGH Document 132 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

motion for summary judgment included a claim of qualified immunity,

the denial of their summary judgment motion and subsequent appeal

result in an automatic stay under Chuman v. Wright, 960 F.2d 104 (9th

Cir. 1992).

Defendants’ argument fails because this Court did not

“arrive at a final, appealable decision on [whether Defendants are

entitled to] qualified immunity.” Way v. County of Ventura, 348 F.3d

808, 810 (9th Cir. 2003). Defendants’ motion for summary judgment was

denied because Defendants failed to comply with Local Rule 56-260(a)’s

requirement that motions for summary judgment be accompanied by a

statement of undisputed facts; and Defendants’ request to file another

motion for summary judgment was denied because Defendants’ failed to

satisfy Rule 16's good cause standard when seeking to modify the law

and motion deadline set by the Rule 16 Scheduling Order. Neither

denial involves the type of decision that is subject to an

interlocutory appeal. Therefore, Defendants’ interlocutory appeal is

frivolous, and their stay motion is denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 22, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01290-GEB-GGH Document 132 Filed 02/23/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] O rder Granting M otion for Stay of Discovery

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

ROBERT R. ANDERSON

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. FLYNN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MEGAN R. O’CARROLL (SBN 215479)

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

Post Office Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-5288

Facsimile: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendant B. Heroux

SA2005101625

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MARK HUNGERFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

BEVERLY HEROUX,

Defendants.

No. CIV S-04-1455 LKK CMK P

ORDER GRANTING

MOTION FOR STAY OF

DISCOVERY

The Court, having considered Defendant’s request for a stay of discovery pending

disposition of Defendant’s motion to dismiss, and good cause having been found:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendant’s motion for stay of discovery is granted and

discovery shall not commence until a scheduling order, if any, is issued in this case. 

DATED: June 2, 2005

/s/ CRAIG M. KELLISON 

Craig M. Kellison

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Hungerford_proposedorder.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01455-LKK -CMK Document 17 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *



In connection with the quarterly report of Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George F. Horner III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 6, 2005 |  | /s/ GEORGE F. HORNER III             
|                  |  | George F. Horner III                 
|                  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification
accompanies this quarterly report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------