alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1   PATIENT PORTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


     Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Kevin Kelly, President, and Director "principal executive officer") of
Patient Portal Technologies,  Inc. (the "Registrant"),  certify that to the best
of my knowledge,  based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for
the period ended March 31, 2007 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)[15(d)]
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.



Dated: 5/30/2007           /s/ KEVIN KELLY
                          ----------------------
                          Kevin Kelly
                          President and Director











--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

JOHN F. GISLA, SB #42829

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2740

Attorneys for the United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN C. JENSEN,

Plaintiff,

v.

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster

General of the U.S. POSTAL

SERVICE,

Defendant.

CIV S-04-0686-GEB-KJM

JOINT STIPULATION TO ELECT

REFERRAL OF ACTION TO VDRP

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16-

271; ORDER

Pursuant to Local Rule 16-271, the parties hereby jointly agree

to submit the above-entitled action to the Voluntary Dispute

Resolution Program (VDRP).

DATED: September 19, 2005 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

 By: /s/ John F. Gisla 

JOHN F. GISLA

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorneys for the United States

Case 2:04-cv-00686-GEB -KJM Document 25 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

DATED: September 16, 2005 /s/ Hartley D. Alley 

HARTLEY D. ALLEY

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 20, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00686-GEB -KJM Document 25 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 60849.

#### Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 291307-K/14787 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4531 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4531

  To authorize an exception to the prohibition on the construction of 
      naval vessels in foreign shipyards, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2024

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize an exception to the prohibition on the construction of 
      naval vessels in foreign shipyards, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Naval Readiness Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO PROHIBITION ON CONSTRUCTION OF NAVAL VESSELS IN 
              FOREIGN SHIPYARDS.

    Section 8679 of title 10, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``subsection (b)'' and 
        inserting ``subsections (b) and (c)'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following new 
        subsection (c):
    ``(c) Exception for Construction of Naval Vessels in Certain 
Countries.--(1) Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect to the 
construction of a naval vessel otherwise covered by that subsection 
if--
            ``(A) the foreign shipyard concerned is located in--
                    ``(i) a North Atlantic Treaty Organization member 
                country; or
                    ``(ii) a country in the Indo-Pacific region that is 
                party to a mutual defense treaty with United States; 
                and
            ``(B) the cost of the construction concerned is less than 
        the cost would be if such construction occurred in a domestic 
        shipyard.
    ``(2) Before the construction of a naval vessel, or a major 
component of the hull or superstructure of a naval vessel, may commence 
at a foreign shipyard under this subsection, the Secretary of the Navy 
shall submit to Congress a certification that the foreign shipyard is 
not owned or operated by a Chinese company or a multinational company 
domiciled in the People's Republic of China.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 46684.

#### Protests 10933-K, etc., of H. A. Goldstone Lumber Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of the *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protests were sustained to that extent.
Exhibit 10.1








March 20, 2012





Partner Communications Company Ltd.


8 Amal Street


Afeq Industrial Park


Rosh-Ha’ayin 48103


Israel





Dear Sirs:




On behalf of Giza Singer Even, 7 Jabotinsky St. Ramat-Gan (the “Consultant”), I hereby confirm that the Consultant has reviewed the information set forth in the Annul Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 (the “Form 20- F”),   for Partner Communications Company Ltd. under Item 5A.1.3 “Acquisition of 012 Smile”, and in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Form 20-F, with respect to testing for impairment of assets and the results thereof.




The Consultant hereby confirms the information referred to above and consents to being named in the Form 20-F as an “expert”.




By: /s/ __________________


Giza Singer Even LTD.





Name:  Hanoch Papoushado


Title: Partner
No. 48500.

#### Protest 877699-G of J. L. Hudson Co. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise covered by the stipulation was held not subject to countervailing duty.
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4489 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building located at 50 United Nations Plaza in San Francisco, California, as the ‘‘Senator 

Dianne Feinstein Federal Building’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4489 ES

1 SECTION 1. SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN FEDERAL BUILD2 ING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

4 50 United Nations Plaza in San Francisco, California, 

5 shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Senator Dianne 

6 Feinstein Federal Building’’. 

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

9 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

10 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Senator 

11 Dianne Feinstein Federal Building’’. 

Passed the Senate September 25, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4489 

AN ACT 

To designate the Federal building located at 50 

Building’’, and for other purposes. fornia, as the ‘‘Senator Dianne Feinstein Federal United Nations Plaza in San Francisco, Cali-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative. 

# ACTION:

Notice of a partially opened meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Industry Trade Advisory Committee on Small and Minority Business (ITAC-11) will hold a meeting on Monday, March 19, 2007, from 9 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The meeting will be closed to the public from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. and opened to the public from 3 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. 

# DATES:

The meeting is scheduled for March 19, 2007, unless otherwise notified. 

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Ronald Reagan International Trade Center, Trade Information Center, Training Room A. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Laura Hellstern, DFO for ITAC-11 at (202) 482-3222, Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

During the opened portion of the meeting the following agenda items will be considered. 
    - Updates on Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee Export Promotion Programs, particularly trade financing.
    - Government Procurement through International Development Banks.
    - Overview of the Recent U.S. Commercial Service Export Promotion Programs, particularly those that assist small businesses in areas of concern expressed by ITAC-11: Foreign       ( print page 9594)                          government procurement opportunities and trade finance.                 

Tiffany M. Moore, 

Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Intergovernmental Affairs and Public Liaison. 

 [FR Doc. E7-3711 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190-W7-P
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of K-tel International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K forthe period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry Dunmall, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  Thereport fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| By                        | /s/   LARRY  DUNMALL |   |
|---------------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| Larry Dunmall             |                      |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |                      |   |
| September 18, 2006        |                      |   |
|                           |                           |        |  |  |

 

----
No. 60852.

#### R. J. Godwin’s Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 275695-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon;, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Hi Greg,

Keith is in Chicago at the Modeler’s conference this week. I personally do not remember an analysis to justify the 

use of 2005 as a base year for the inventory although he may have done an analysis to show why certain 

monitoring data years may not have been reliable. Keith can chime in on that.

From my end, I know we selected 2005 because Hawaii was already late starting their RH effort and 2005 would 

be the most recent year a full statewide inventory would be required for the NEI reporting. We had better 

stationary source data for calculating 2005 emissions than 2002, plus the NPS at the time, saw no problem with 

us using 2005 as a base year. Hawaii was not included in the WRAP work products so the NPS thought we could 

be flexible in choosing a base year. So 2005 was it.

Did you require a more scientific explanation? If you need an answer before next week and you would like me to 

contact Keith to double check if he has anything, I can call him on the mainland.

Thanks, Priscilla

Priscilla Ligh

Clean Air Branch

Hawaii Department of Health

(808) 586-4200

priscilla.ligh@doh.hawaii.gov

From: Gregory Nudd [mailto:Nudd.Gregory@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:49 AM 

To: McFall, Keith 

RE: analysis of suitability of 2005 base year inventory 

Ligh, Priscilla W K 

to: 

Gregory Nudd 

05/03/2012 04:19 PM 

Cc: 

"McFall, Keith" 

Hide Details 

From: "Ligh, Priscilla W K" <priscilla.ligh@doh.hawaii.gov>

To: Gregory Nudd/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: "McFall, Keith" <Keith.McFall@doh.hawaii.gov>

History: This message has been replied to. 

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\gnudd\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web7761.htm 5/15/2012
Cc: Ligh, Priscilla W K 

Subject: analysis of suitability of 2005 base year inventory

 

Keith, 

I recall that you did an analysis justifying the use of 2005 as the base year of the inventory. Is that correct? Could 

you send me a copy? (Sorry if you already did!) 

Thanks, 

Greg Nudd

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\gnudd\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web7761.htm 5/15/2012
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARVELLOUS A. GREENE, SR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1983 FCD KJM P

vs.

CASTRO,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an amended complaint pursuant

to the court's order of May 2, 2006. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's May 31, 2006 motion for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an

amended complaint. 

DATED: June 19, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/mp

gree1983.36

Case 2:04-cv-01983-FCD-KJM Document 14 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 1
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2014-0187 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-087-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 20110030

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.




                               /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



                               /s/ Christine R. Piano
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Christine R. Piano
                               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Date: August 7, 2008
In The Matter Of: 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

) 

H 

BEM SYSTEMS, INC. 

) FDMS No. FAA-2016-4264 

) 

Respondent 

) FAA Case No. 2015NM730029 

) 

) Hon. Douglas M. Rawald 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR DECISION 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.218(£)(5), Complainant moves for a decision with respect to the 

violations alleged in the complaint. This motion is based on the pleadings. Specifically, in its 

answer to the complaint, BEM Systems, Inc., through its Chief Financial Officer, Mark 

Murset, states that it does not dispute any of the claims in the complaint. Rather, BEM 

Systems, Inc., is only contesting the amount of the civil penalty. 

Based on this answer, there is no genuine issue of material fact with respect to the violations, 

and the Agency is entitled to a decision finding established each allegation set forth in the 

numbered paragraphs in Section II of the complaint and each regulatory violation set forth in 

Section III of the complaint as a matter of law. 

Dated this 15th day of September 2016. 

Patricia A. MeN all 

Acting Assistant Chief Counsel 

for Enforcement 

By: 

Glenn H. Brown 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

222 W 7th A venue Box 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

email: glenn.brown@faa.gov 

telephone: (907) 271-5271 (direct) 

(907) 271-2800 (fax) 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Re: BEM Systems, Inc., 

FDMS No. FAA-2016-4264 

I hereby certify that on this date I have served a copy of the foregoing Motion for Decision by 

postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested and by either facsimile transmission or 

electronic mail, as indicated, to the following: 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald 

Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Fax: 202-366-7536 

BEM Systems, Inc. 

ATTN: Mark Murset, CFO 

100 Passaic A venue 

Chatham, NJ 07928 

Email: mmurset@bemsys.com 

2 

I further certify that on this date I have served the original and one copy of the foregoing Motion 

for Decision by postage-prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested and facsimile, addressed 

as follows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 

Fax: (202) 267-1293 

DATED:-+ I~Qol~ 

Office of Regional Counsel 

222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, AAL-7 

Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7587