alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





i.
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or


its
      staff
      upon request.





Date: November
              14,, 2007
            By:
            /s/ John
              ChenBy:
              John ChenTitle:
              Director and Chief Financial Officer
1-WA/2721277.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, 

LLC, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 05-6020 (PBT) 

RULE 7.1 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

 Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs Blackwater 

Security Consulting LLC and Blackwater Lodge & Training Center, Inc. state that they are 

wholly-owned subsidiaries of The Prince Group. No publicly-held corporation owns ten percent 

(10%) or more of the stock of any of the foregoing entities. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 _______________________________ 

Dated: March 20, 2007 Dennis J. Valenza 

 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 1701 Market Street 

 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103 

 215.963.5000 

 215.963.5001 (facsimile) 

Paul A. Zevnik 

Howard T. Weir 

Harvey Bartle, IV 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

202.739.3000 

202.739.3001 (facsimile) 

s/ Harvey Bartle, IV 

Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 40 Filed 03/20/2007 Page 1 of 1

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 40

Dockets.Justia.com
No. 59515.

protests 192627-K and 214325-K (Seattle).

#### Arthur J. Humphreys *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the .merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3992 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from 

directly making loans under the 7(a) loan program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2024 

Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. RISCH, Mr. 

CRAMER, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. DAINES, Mr. LANKFORD, Ms. ERNST, Mr. 

CORNYN, Mr. BUDD, Mr. COTTON, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. BRAUN, 

and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Administrator of the Small Business Administration from directly making loans under the 7(a) loan 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Access to 

5 Credit for Small Businesses Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DIRECT 7(a) LOANS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any provision of 

8 subsection (a) of section 7 of the Small Business Act (15 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3992 IS

1 U.S.C. 636(a)), the Administrator of the Small Business 

2 Administration may not directly make a loan pursuant to 

3 such subsection. 

4 (b) EXISTING LOANS.—The Administrator of the 

5 Small Business Administration shall service a direct loan 

6 made under section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 

7 U.S.C. 636(a)) if such loan was made before the date of 

8 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Jon Garfield, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clearant, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 4, 2006 /s/ JON GARFIELD   Jon Garfield   *Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)*  
27
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4539 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make certain provisions 

with respect to qualified ABLE programs permanent. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2024 

Mr. SCHMITT (for himself, Mr. CASEY, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. 

COTTON, Mr. WELCH, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. KAINE, Mrs. BRITT, Ms. 

KLOBUCHAR, Mr. MULLIN, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

certain provisions with respect to qualified ABLE programs permanent. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Nationwide 

5 Access to a Better Life Experience Act’’ or the ‘‘ENABLE 

6 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4539 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF INCREASED CON2 TRIBUTIONS TO ABLE ACCOUNTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529A(b)(2)(B)(ii) of the 

4 Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘before January 1, 2026’’. 

6 (b) ALLOWANCE OF SAVERS CREDIT.—Section 

7 25B(d)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as 

8 amended by section 103(e)(1) of the SECURE 2.0 Act 

9 of 2022, is amended by striking ‘‘before January 1, 

10 2026,’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 SEC. 3. PERMANENT EXTENSION OF ROLLOVERS TO ABLE 

15 PROGRAMS FROM 529 PROGRAMS. 

16 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 529(c)(3)(C)(i)(III) of 

17 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking 

18 ‘‘before January 1, 2026,’’. 

19 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

20 this section shall apply to distributions made after the 

21 date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 52976.

#### Griggs, Cooper & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 115261-K/12755 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protest was overruled in all other respects.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DOMINICK HARVEY, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-2965

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed February 6, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for Hillsborough County; Kimberly K.

Fernandez, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Lee v. State, 679 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 1996); Edwards v. 

State, 830 So. 2d 141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002). 

CASANUEVA, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
```

                          AMENDMENT TO THE BY-LAWS OF
                        NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION

This Amendment to the By-laws of Navistar Financial Corporation is made and
is effective as of the 1st day of February 2003.  Capitalized terms used in
this Amendment and not otherwise defined in it shall have the meaning given
to them in the By-laws.

(a)   The first sentence of Article III, Section 3 is hereby deleted and the
        following sentence is inserted in its place: "The President shall have
        such powers and perform such duties as may be prescribed by the Board
        of Directors at the time of his or her election and such powers and
        duties as may be assigned to him or her from time to time by the Board
        of Directors."

(b)   Article III, Section is amended by the insertion of the phrase "a Chief
        Executive Officer," immediately after the phrase "a Chairman of the
        Board".

(c)   Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 each shall be renumbered to 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
        and 8 respectively, and a new Section 2 shall be added which shall
        read in its entirety as follows:  "SECTION 2.  Chief Executive
        Officer.  The Chief Executive Officer shall have the powers and
        perform the duties incident to that position.  He or she shall be in
        general and active charge of the business operations of the
        Corporation, and shall be its principal executive officer.  He or she
        shall have such powers and perform such other duties as may be
        prescribed by the Board of Directors or provided in the By-laws".

IN WITNESS WHEROF, this Amendment, which restates and integrates and further
amends the provisions of the By-Laws as heretofore amended or supplement, has
been duly adopted by the Corporation's Board of Directors as of the day and
year first above written.

                NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION

                /s/PHYLLIS E. COCHRAN
                   Phyllis E. Cochran

                   Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



KREISLER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Edward A. Stern, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 24, 2004 |  | /s/ Edward A. Stern,   
|                         |  | Edward A. Stern        
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer
No. 57712.

#### F. L. Kraemer & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 199553-K(A) (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of crude rubber dust which is a manufacture, composed wholly or in chief value of india rubber, known as “hard rubber,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
COMMITTEES 

NATURAL RESOURCES, CHAIR 

SELECT COMMITTEE ON DISABILITIES, CHAIR 

SELECT COMMITTEE ON WINE, CHAIR 

JOINT COMMITTEE ON FISHERIES AND 

AQUACULTURE, CHAIR 

BUDGET 

BUDGET SUBCOMMITTEE #1 

JOINT LEGISLATIVE BUDGET 

ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY AND 

TOXIC MATERIALS 

GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION WESLEY CHESBRO 

ASSEMBLYMEMBER, FIRST DISTRICT 

July 28,2011 

STATE CAPITOL 

P.O. BOX 942849 

SACRAMENTO, CA 94249-0001 

(916)319-2001 

FAX (916) 319-2101 

DISTRICT OFFICES 

710E. STREET, SUITE 150 

EUREKA, CA 95501 

(707)445-7014 

FAX (707) 445-6607 

50 "D" STREET, SUITE 450 

SANTA ROSA, CA 95404 

(707) 576-2526 

FAX (707) 576-2297 

311 N. STATE STREET 

UKIAH, CA 95482 

(707) 463-5770 

FAX (707) 463-5773 

Aloha Ley 

Associate Director, X-50 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE W86-310 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Docket: DOT-OST-2011-0119 

Humboldt County, Arcata/Eureka Airport 

ro 

CO 

50: ^ 

Dear Ms. Ley: 

As California State Assemblyman Representing the First District, I strongly support the air 

service proposal detailed in the Small Community Air Service Development Program grant 

application. Arcata/Eureka plays an important role in providing support to business, 

government, education, and leisure travel to and from this northwestern coastal California 

community. 

Growth of the Arcata/Eureka economy over the past few years has been fueled by the presence of 

the Arcata/Eureka Airport. Future community growth and economic development depends in 

part on the Airport's ability to meet the growing needs of local business as well as that of 

companies considering Arcata/Eureka as a location for their operations. 

Arcata/Eureka Airport has forged strong ties with the business community to attract better air 

service. We appreciate the opportunity to expand that partnership to include the United States 

Department of Transportation though the Small Community Air Service Development Program. 

Respectfully, 

ASSEMBLYMAN WESLEY CHESBRO, 1'* Assembly District 

WC:gam 

cc: Trina Froehlich, CPA/Senior Consultant, Mead & Hunt, Inc/M & H Architure, Inc. 476 

Salty Way, Eugene, OR 97404 

cc: Jacquelyn Hulsey, CAE Aviation Division Manager, Public Works - Division of Aviation, 

1106 2"*' Street, Eureka, CA 95501 -^^S=^-

Printed on Recycled Paper
Order entered September 16, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00518-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS, ET AL., Appellants

V.

LBJ/BROOKHAVEN INVESTORS, L.P., Appellee

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-20-01518

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ September 14, 2021 unopposed motion for an 

extension of time to file their brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and 

extend the time to October 15, 2021.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03625

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03625\03625_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03625\03625_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03625\03625_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03625\03625_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03625\03625_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03625\03625_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03625\03625_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03625\03625_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03625\Certification Statement_03625.pdf Plant certification statement

03625\Supporting Documents\C2-31 Fly Ash.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03625\Supporting Documents\C3-36 diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03625\Supporting Documents\GoogleMap1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03625\Supporting Documents\GoogleMap2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03625\Supporting Documents\SiteDrainageMap.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03625\Supporting Documents\WB1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

Robert L. Zaletel, Esq. (SB# 096262)

McQUAID BEDFORD & VAN ZANDT LLP

221 Main Street, 16 Floor th

San Francisco, CA 94105

Telephone: 415/905-0200

Facsimile: 415/905-0202

RZaletel@mbvz.com

Attorneys for Defendant

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VINCENT A. THOMAS,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

and DOES 1-100, 

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV S-04-1007 FCD GGH

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE, AND ORDER THEREON

Pursuant to the settlement between the parties, they hereby stipulate through their

undersigned counsel that this action be dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear its own costs and

attorneys fees.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

Dated: July 25, 2005 McQUAID BEDFORD & VAN ZANDT, LLP

By: /s/Robert Zaletel 

Robert L. Zaletel

Attorneys for Defendant

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

Case 2:04-cv-01007-FCD-GGH Document 26 Filed 08/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: July 27, 2005 LEO F. DONAHUE, INC.

By: /s/ Leo F. Donahue 

Leo F. Donahue

Attorneys for Plaintiff

VINCENT A. THOMAS

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

DATED: August 3, 2005.

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

Honorable Frank C. Damrell, Jr.

US District Judge 

G:\DOCS\FCD\orders to be signed\THOMAS-UP dism 0803.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01007-FCD-GGH Document 26 Filed 08/03/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 52968.

#### W. T. Grant Company *v.*United States,

protest 910480-G/11096 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 26, 2012

h1217

Order 

December 26, 2012

145936

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145936

COA: 305368

Saginaw CC: 10-034104-FC

WENDOR MONCADO, SR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WALLACE ORR, Private First Class, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 19, 39 CMR 19

No. 21,233

November 15, 1968

*Lieutenant David E. Miller,*JAGC, USNR, was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel C. R. Larouche,*USMC, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The decision of the board of review as to the Additional Charge and its specification is reversed. United States v Tassos, 18 USCMA 12, 39 CMR 12, this day decided. The findings of guilty as to the Additional Charge and its specification are set aside and the Charge is ordered dismissed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for submission to the board of review for reconsideration of the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty.
### REGULATORY EVALUATION

Din-eCiOl-ate 

### identifier: 2008-NM-205-AD

Execut"1ve Order 12866: 

### Could the AD beconsidered a"significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) 

### DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Isthe AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) 

### Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entit.ies? YES () explain NO (X) HnEf"astate Aviation 

### in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is

### it appropriate to include specific 

### requirements foraircraft operated inAlaska, where aviation might bethe only mode of transportation? YES () explam NO (X)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

GREGORY ESKRIDGE,

Plaintiff,

v.

A. CORREA, et al.,

Defendants.

2:04-CV-0865 LKK GGH P

ORDER

The Court, having considered Defendants’ request for an extension of time to serve

responses to Plaintiff’s first set of interrogatories and request for production of documents, and

good cause having been found:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendants shall be granted an extension of time, to and

including March 16, 2006, to complete and serve responses to Plaintiff’s first set of

Interrogatories, first request for admissions, and request for production of documents.

Dated:2/28/06 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

__________________________________

The Honorable Gregory G. Hollows

esk865.eot

Case 2:04-cv-00865-LKK -GGH Document 49 Filed 02/28/06 Page 1 of 1