alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0017 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0017

**European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Gabonese Republic (COM(2006)0454 - C6-0303/2006 - 2006/0156(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 250 E , 25/10/2007 P. 0090 - 0091 *

P6_TA(2007)0017

EC-Gabon Fisheries Partnership *

European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a Council regulation on the conclusion of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Gabonese Republic (COM(2006)0454 — C6-0303/2006 — 2006/0156(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation (COM(2006)0454) [1],

- having regard to Article 300(2), first subparagraph of the EC Treaty,

- having regard to Article 300(3), first subparagraph, of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0303/2006),

- having regard to Rules 51 and 83(7) of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Fisheries and the opinions of the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Development (A6-0477/2006),

1. Approves the proposal for a Council regulation as amended and approves conclusion of the agreement;

2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the governments and parliaments of the Member States and of the Gabonese Republic.

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION | AMENDMENTS BY PARLIAMENT |

Amendment 1

Recital 2a (new)

| (2a) The EC financial compensation will be used for the development of coastal populations dependent on fisheries as well as for the creation of small local freezing and processing industries; |

Amendment 2

Article 3a (new)

| Article 3a During the final year of the period of application of the Protocol and before any new agreement is concluded or the period of application of the Agreement attached to this Regulation is extended, the Commission shall submit to the European Parliament and the Council a report on the application of the Agreement and the conditions under which it was implemented. |

Amendment 3

Article 3b (new)

| Article 3b The Commission shall report annually to the European Parliament and the Council on the results of the multiannual sectoral programme described in Article 7 of the Protocol. |

Amendment 4

Article 3c (new)

| Article 3c On the basis of the report submitted by the Commission pursuant to Article 3a and after consulting the European Parliament, the Council shall if appropriate confer upon the Commission a negotiating mandate with a view to the adoption of a new Protocol. |

Amendment 5

Article 3d (new)

| Article 3d The Commission shall evaluate each year whether Member States whose vessels fish under the Agreement have complied with reporting requirements. |

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
(A.R.D. 149)

Entry No. 759497, etc.

#### International Seaway Trading Corp. *v.*United States

Second Division, Appellate Term

(Decided August 14, 1962)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the appellant.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the appellee.

Before Lawrence, Rao, and Eord, Judges

Lawrence, Judge:

This application for review of Reappraisement Decision 10186 (48 Cust. Ct. 575), initial No. R59/18513, which covered the appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made part of this decision, having been formally abandoned, is dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 50451.

#### Protests 69950-K, etc., of Foster Canning Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of dog food similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 175, C. A. D. 304), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 

	
	 






  
 CUSIP 34960W 10 6 
 SEE REVERSE FOR 

CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 FORTERRA, INC. 
 CORPORATE 

DELAWARE 
 Countersigned: 
 AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER &
TRUST COMPANY, LLC 
 6201 15th Avenue 
 Brooklyn, NY 11219 
 By 

Transfer Agent and Registrar Authorized Officer 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 AUTHORIZED: 190,000,000 COMMON SHARES, 
 $0.001 PAR
VALUE PER SHARE 
 This Certifies That 
 is the owner of 
 Fully Paid and Non-Assessable
Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value of 
 FORTERRA, INC. 

transferable on the books of this Corporation in person or by attorney upon surrender of this Certificate duly endorsed or
assigned. This 
 Certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware,
and to the Certificate of Incorporation 
 and the Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This
Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has
caused this Certificate to be signed by the facsimile signatures of its 
 duly authorized officers and to be
sealed with the facsimile seal of the Corporation. 
 Dated: 

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL AND SECRETARY 

001 
 SPECIMEN forterra number shares 







 



 
  
 FORTERRA,
INC. 
 AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC 

TRANSFER FEE: AS REQUIRED 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed 
 as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN COM - as tenants in common 
 TEN ENT - as
tenants by the entireties UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - Custodian 
 JT TEN - as joint tenants with right (Cust) (Minor)

 of survivorship and not as under Uniform Gifts to Minors 

tenants in common 
 Act 
 (State) 

Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER 
 IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 FOR VALUE
RECEIVED, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL
ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE 
 Shares 
 of the Common Stock represented by the within Certificate and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
 Attorney to transfer 
 the said stock on the books
of the within-named Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated:20 , 

Signature: X 
 Signature(s) Guaranteed: 
 Signature: X 

THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE

 IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE

 GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit
Unions) WITH 
 MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40352

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE LUIS SERRATO-BELMONTEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-00-R-1227-1

--------------------

December 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Luis Serrato-Belmontez appeals his guilty–plea

conviction and sentence, arising out of his having been found in

the United States after having been “denied admission, excluded,

deported, or removed” in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Serrato-Belmontez contends his indictment was

unconstitutionally vague because it failed to charge him with any

mens rea. Serrato-Belmontez concedes that his argument is

foreclosed by this court’s precedent in United States v. GuzmanOcampo, 236 F.3d 233, 236 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S.
No. 01-40352

-2-

Ct. 2600 (2001), and United States v. Berrios-Centeno, 250 F.3d

294, 299-300 (5th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 122 S. Ct. 288

(2001), but he wishes to preserve the argument for review by the

Supreme Court.

Serrato-Belmontez also claims his prior conviction for

transporting aliens did not constitute an “aggravated felony”

conviction warranting a 16-level increase in his base offense

level under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A). As Serrato-Belmontez

concedes, this court has already determined that transporting

aliens constitutes an aggravated felony. See United States v.

Monjaras-Castaneda, 190 F.3d 326, 331 (5th Cir. 1999), cert.

denied, 528 U.S. 1194 (2000). Serrato-Belmontez seeks only to

preserve the issue for Supreme Court review. 

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
COMMUNITY BANK OF GEORGIA, INC.
               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14(b) AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


     In  connection with the Quarterly Report of Community Bank of Georgia, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with  the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I,  Lloyd  E. Gunter, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify pursuant to
Rule  15d-14(b)  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     (1)  To  the  best  of  my  knowledge,  the  Report fully complies with the
          requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of  1934;  and

     (2)  To  the  best of my knowledge, the information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results  of  operation  of  the  Company.



November 21, 2003

/s/ Lloyd E. Gunter
-------------------
Lloyd E. Gunter
President / Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
P.1 

OAR Box 1830 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

122) IV-C-88 

Docket Number: 

A-87-11 

Printed 11/13/2008 7:20:57 AM Sheet 122 of 232 
_****>* > 

P.2 

<T _ NJ 

i m.mm '<i 

\ ^W/J S UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

* -VK/-J WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

\TM^ FEB 2 6 1988 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Honorable Edward F. Feighan 

House of Representatives 

Washington, D. C. 20515 

Dear Mr. Feighan: 

Thank you for your letter of February 10, 1988, forwarding 

a letter from one of your constituents, Mr. Charles J. Sims, 

expressing his views of EPA's proposal to require onboard 

refueling emission controls. 

This letter will be placed in the public docket to 

be considered along with many others we have received on 

this important issue. 

Sincerely yours, 

"' >-, v-i r. A M 

Richard D. Wilson 

Director, Office of Mobile Sources 

cc: Docket A-87-11
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AMP Productions, Ltd. on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Mills, Chief
Executive Officer, President, Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


March 11, 2011



By   /s/ Thomas Mills
     Thomas E. Mills
     President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,
     Chief  Financial  Officer,  and
     Principal Accounting Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Willie Bailey, III,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-2067 GEB PAN P

vs. Order

J. Wedell, et al., 

Defendants.

-oOoApril 29, 2005, plaintiff requested an extension of time to

file an amended complaint and “serve” defendants. Good cause

appearing, plaintiff’s request is granted and time to file an

amended complaint is extended until 30 days from the date this

order is signed. The court will order service of defendants if

plaintiff succeeds in pleading cognizable claims.

So ordered.

Dated: May 10, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-02067-GEB-EFB Document 11 Filed 05/11/05 Page 1 of 1
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 8/21/2023 1

No Relief for a Last-Minute Speculative 

Complaint of Voter Suppression by the President 

Mi Familia Vota Education Fund v. Trump 

(Richard J. Leon, D.D.C. 1:20-cv-3030) 

A federal complaint filed thirteen days before the 2020 general election alleged voter suppression by the President over the previous 

few months. The district judge denied immediate relief, finding the 

last-minute allegations to be speculative. 

Subject: Campaign activities. Topic: Laches. 

An organization and two voters filed a federal complaint in the district court 

for the District of Columbia on October 21, 2020, against President Trump, 

the attorney general, and the secretary of homeland security, alleging 

schemes to discourage, inconvenience, and intimidate voters.1

 With their 

complaint, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order, a 

preliminary injunction, and a speedy declaratory judgment.2 Five days later, 

the parties jointly moved for briefing on the other motion to conclude by October 28 with a hearing scheduled for the following day.3

 Judge Richard J. 

Leon agreed to set a telephonic hearing for the afternoon of October 29.4

Judge Leon began the hearing by pointing out that with the election to be 

held in five days, three to five months after the actions complained of, there 

was no time for an effective preliminary injunction, so the relief in question 

would be a temporary restraining order (TRO).5 Judge Leon concluded, 

Well, as is the practice of this Court and all the other judges on our 

court, in the case of TROs, we announce our [decision] on the spot; we 

don’t issue a written opinion. 

This case has more holes than a piece of Swiss cheese, and it’s no surprise, as a result, that it’s being at the 11th hour and 58th minute in the electoral season of our country this year. 

As far as this Court can discern, the Court lacks jurisdiction. The plaintiffs have not demonstrated [sufficient] standing; it’s way too speculative. 

. . . 

. . . 

So for all those reasons, the Court will deny the TRO. The case will be 

moot as of Tuesday.6

The plaintiffs dismissed their case voluntarily the next day.7

1. Complaint, Mi Familia Voter Educ. Fund v. Trump, No. 1:20-cv-3030 (D.D.C. Oct. 21, 

2020), D.E. 1. 

2. Motion, id. (Oct. 21, 2020), D.E. 2. 

3. Joint Motion, id. (Oct. 26, 2020), D.E. 16. 

4. Docket Sheet, id. (Oct. 21, 2020). 

5. Transcript at 6–7, id. (Oct. 29, 2020, filed Nov. 17, 2020), D.E. 25. 

6. Id. at 32–33. 

7. Dismissal Notice, id. (Oct. 30, 2020), D.E. 24.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3885 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0105 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0105

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 April 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation opening tariff quotas for imports into Bulgaria and Romania of raw cane sugar for supply to refineries in the marketing years 2006/2007, 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 (COM(2006)0798 - C6-0003/2007 - 2006/0261(CNS)) **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0158 - 0159 *

P6_TA(2007)0105

Tariff quotas for imports into Bulgaria and Romania of raw cane sugar *

European Parliament legislative resolution of 24 April 2007 on the proposal for a Council regulation opening tariff quotas for imports into Bulgaria and Romania of raw cane sugar for supply to refineries in the marketing years 2006/2007, 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 (COM(2006)0798 — C6-0003/2007 — 2006/0261(CNS))

(Consultation procedure)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the Council (COM(2006)0798) [1],

- having regard to Article 37(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Council consulted Parliament (C6-0003/2007),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (A6-0072/2007),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly, pursuant to Article 250(2) of the EC Treaty;

3. Calls on the Council to notify Parliament if it intends to depart from the text approved by Parliament;

4. Asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to amend the Commission proposal substantially;

5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

TEXT PROPOSED BY THE COMMISSION | AMENDMENTS BY PARLIAMENT |

Amendment 1

Article 1, paragraph 3a (new)

| 3a. From the marketing year 2009/2010, no additional tariff quotas shall be allocated other than under Council Regulation (EC) No 2501/2001 of 10 December 2001 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences for the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 December 2004 [2] (the "Everything But Arms" Regulation) or in relation to preferential market access for African, Caribbean and Pacific States. |

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

[2] OJ L 346, 31.12.2001, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LORENZO CARL PAYNES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1868 MCE KJM P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. 

By an order filed December 30, 2005, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within thirty days, the four USM-285 forms and copies of his May 23, 2005

amended complaint, which are required to effect service on the defendants. On January 19,

2006, plaintiff submitted the four USM-285 forms and summons but failed to submit complete

copies of the May 23, 2005 amended complaint. The filed copies of the amended complaint are

missing exhibits Q through Z.

However, on March 20, 2006, the court directed the U.S. Marshals to serve

summons and complaint. That order is hereby rescinded, to be reissued when plaintiff has

provided complete copies of the amended complaints. 

Case 2:04-cv-01868-MCE -KJM Document 22 Filed 05/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The order of March 20, 2006 is vacated. 

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide plaintiff with a copy of the May

23, 2005 amended complaint. 

3. Within thirty days, plaintiff shall submit to the court five copies of the May 23,

2005 amended complaint including exhibits Q through Z as required to effect service. Failure to

return the copies within the specified time period will result in a recommendation that this action

be dismissed.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S.

Marshal.

DATED: May 16, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/mp

payn1868.8f

Case 2:04-cv-01868-MCE -KJM Document 22 Filed 05/16/06 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 460 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to establish an urban 

Indian organization confer policy for the Department of Health and 

Human Services. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2023 

Ms. SMITH (for herself and Mr. MULLIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Indian Health Care Improvement Act to establish an urban Indian organization confer policy for the 

Department of Health and Human Services. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Urban Indian Health 

5 Confer Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. URBAN INDIAN ORGANIZATION CONFER POLICY. 

7 Section 514 of the Indian Health Care Improvement 

8 Act (25 U.S.C. 1660d) is amended by striking subsection 

9 (b) and inserting the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 460 IS

1 ‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall ensure 

2 that the Service and the other agencies and offices of the 

3 Department confer, to the maximum extent practicable, 

4 with urban Indian organizations in carrying out— 

5 ‘‘(1) this Act; and 

6 ‘‘(2) other provisions of law relating to Indian 

7 health care.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00020-CR

Corey DENTS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR7707

Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 4, 2015

DISMISSED

Corey Dents pleaded nolo contendere to a second offense of Assault-Family pursuant to a 

plea bargain agreement. As part of his plea-bargain, Dents signed a separate “Waiver of Appeal.” 

The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, 

and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Dents timely filed a notice of appeal, the clerk sent copies of the 

certification and notice of appeal to this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, 
04-15-00020-CR

which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has 

been filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). 

The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the 

punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and that the trial court 

denied permission to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). We have reviewed the clerk’s record, 

and the trial court’s certification appears to accurately state that this is a plea bargain case and 

Dents does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) 

(holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s 

certification is accurate). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the 

defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

On January 23, 2015, we gave Dents notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless 

written consent to appeal and an amended certification showing Dents has the right to appeal were 

signed by the trial judge and made part of the appellate record by February 13, 2015. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order), 

disp. on merits, No. 04-03-00176-CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not 

designated for publication). Neither written permission to appeal nor an amended certification 

showing Dents has the right to appeal has been filed. We therefore dismiss this appeal. TEX. R.

APP. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -