1928 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

applicable laws and regulations and is 

consistent with the savings association’s 

charter and bylaws. 

(ii) The savings association is at least 

adequately capitalized under § 565.4(b) 

of this chapter and meets the regulatory 

capital requirements at § 567.2 of this 

chapter. 

(iii) The savings association is or will 

be able to service the covered securities. 

(iv) The covered securities are 

consistent with the requirements of this 

section. 

(v) The covered securities and related 

transactions sufficiently transfer risk 

from the Deposit Insurance Fund. 

(vi) OTS has no objection to the 

issuance based on the savings 

association’s overall policies, condition, 

and operations. 

(3) OTS approval or non-objection is 

conditioned upon no material changes 

to the information disclosed in the 

application or notice submitted to OTS. 

OTS may impose such additional 

requirements or conditions as it may 

deem necessary to protect purchasers, 

the savings association, OTS, or the 

Deposit Insurance Fund. 

(e) Amendments. If a savings 

association amends the covered 

securities or related documents 

following the completion of OTS 

review, it must obtain OTS approval or 

non-objection under this section before 

it may include the amended securities 

in supplementary capital. 

(f) Sale of covered securities. The 

savings association must complete the 

sale of covered securities within one 

year after OTS approval or nonobjection under this section. A savings 

association may request an extension of 

the offering period by filing a written 

request with OTS. The savings 

association must demonstrate good 

cause for the extension and file the 

request at least 30 days before the 

expiration of the offering period or any 

extension of the offering period. 

(g) Reports. A savings association 

must file the following information with 

OTS within 30 days after the savings 

association completes the sale of 

covered securities includable as 

supplementary capital. If the savings 

association filed its application or 

notice following the completion of the 

sale, it must submit this information 

with its application or notice: 

(1) A written report indicating the 

number of purchasers, the total dollar 

amount of securities sold, the net 

proceeds received by the savings 

association from the issuance, and the 

amount of covered securities, net of all 

expenses, to be included as 

supplementary capital; 

(2) Three copies of an executed form 

of the securities and a copy of any 

related documents governing the 

issuance or administration of the 

securities; and 

(3) A certification by the appropriate 

executive officer indicating that the 

savings association complied with all 

applicable laws and regulations in 

connection with the offering, issuance, 

and sale of the securities. 

Dated: November 28, 2006. 

By the Office of Thrift Supervision. 

John M. Reich, 

Director. 

[FR Doc. E7–475 Filed 1–16–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6720–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2006–25670; Directorate 

Identifier 2006–NM–027–AD; Amendment 

39–14868; AD 2006–26–10] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model 

A300 B2 and B4 Series Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

Airbus Model A300 B2 and B4 series 

airplanes. This AD requires revising the 

airplane flight manual (AFM) to include 

procedures for resetting the trim and 

pitch trim levers after each landing, 

determining which servomotor moves 

the pitch trim control wheel, and doing 

applicable other specified actions. This 

AD also provides for optional 

terminating actions for those 

requirements. This AD results from a 

report of a sudden nose-up movement 

after disengagement of the autopilot in 

cruise. We are issuing this AD to ensure 

that the flightcrew is aware of the 

procedures for resetting the trim and 

pitch trim levers after each landing and 

to prevent failure of the servomotors of 

the pitch trim systems during flight. 

Failure of the servomotors of the pitch 

trim systems could result in 

uncommanded nose-up movement of 

the control surface of the pitch trim 

systems after disengagement of the 

autopilot in cruise. 

DATES: This AD becomes effective 

February 21, 2007. 

The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

of certain publications listed in the AD 

as of February 21, 2007. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http:// 

dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility, U.S. Department 

of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, 

SW., Nassif Building, Room PL–401, 

Washington, DC. 

Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice 

Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France, 

for service information identified in this 

AD. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas Stafford, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, 

Washington 98057–3356; telephone 

(425) 227–1622; fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Examining the Docket 

You may examine the airworthiness 

directive (AD) docket on the Internet at 

http://dms.dot.gov or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility office 

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except Federal holidays. 

The Docket Management Facility office 

(telephone (800) 647–5227) is located on 

the plaza level of the Nassif Building at 

the street address stated in the 

ADDRESSES section. 

Discussion 

The FAA issued a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR 

part 39 to include an AD that would 

apply to certain Airbus Model A300 B2 

and B4 series airplanes. That NPRM was 

published in the Federal Register on 

August 23, 2006 (71 FR 49385). That 

NPRM proposed to require revising the 

airplane flight manual (AFM) to include 

procedures for resetting the trim and 

pitch trim levers after each landing, 

determining which servomotor moves 

the pitch trim control wheel, and doing 

applicable other specified actions. That 

NPRM also provided for optional 

terminating actions for those 

requirements. 

Comments 

We provided the public the 

opportunity to participate in the 

development of this AD. We have 

considered the comments received. 

Request To Include Procedures From 

the Temporary Revision 

ASTAR Air Cargo (ASTAR) requests 

that paragraph (f) of the NPRM be 

revised to include the AFM procedures 

specified in French airworthiness 

directive F–2003–291 R1, issued July 6, 

2005. ASTAR notes that paragraph (f) of 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 1929 

the NPRM requires revising the AFM by 

‘‘including the information in Airbus 

A300 Temporary Revision (TR) 4.03.00/ 

04, Issue 02, dated November 18, 2003.’’

ASTAR states that TR 4.03.00/04 may 

not be considered active nor accessible 

from Airbus, and that the procedures are 

not included in its A300 United States 

AFM. 

We agree with ASTAR’s request for 

the stated reasons. We have revised 

paragraphs (f) and (g) of this AD 

accordingly. 

Request To Incorporate by Reference 

Service Information in the NPRM 

The Modification and Replacement 

Parts Association (MARPA) requests 

that all service information referenced 

in the NPRM be incorporated by 

reference during the NPRM phase of the 

rulemaking. MARPA states that, when a 

service document is incorporated by 

reference, it loses its private, protected 

status and becomes itself a public 

document. MARPA contends that public 

laws such as ADs must be made public 

because operators cannot comply with 

ADs referencing private writings. 

MARPA expresses concern that failing 

to incorporate by reference essential 

service information could result in a 

court decision invalidating the AD. 

We do not agree that service 

information should be incorporated by 

reference during the NPRM phase of 

rulemaking. The Office of the Federal 

Register (OFR) requires that service 

information that is necessary to do the 

requirements of the AD be incorporated 

by reference during the final rule phase 

of rulemaking. This final rule 

incorporates by reference the service 

information necessary for doing the 

requirements of this AD. Further, we 

point out that while service information 

that is incorporated by reference does 

become public information, it does not 

lose its copyright protection. For that 

reason, we advise the public to contact 

the manufacturer to obtain copies of the 

referenced service information. 

Request To Post Service Information on 

the Docket Management System (DMS) 

MARPA also requests that 

incorporated by reference service 

information be posted on the DMS. 

MARPA states that the OFR’s stated 

purpose of incorporating by reference 

service information in the Federal 

Register is brevity; to keep from 

expanding the Federal Register 

needlessly by publishing service 

information already in the hands of the 

affected individuals. MARPA also states 

that affected individuals has 

traditionally meant aircraft owners and 

operators who are generally provided 

service information by the 

manufacturer. MARPA points out that a 

new class of affected individuals has 

emerged, since the majority of aircraft 

maintenance is now done by specialty 

shops instead of repair organizations, 

component servicing and repairs shops, 

etc. MARPA further points out that 

distributing service information only to 

aircraft owners who are possibly a 

financing or leasing company, may not 

actually reach the person responsible for 

doing the AD. 

In regard to MARPA’s request that 

service information be made available to 

the public by publication in the Federal 

Register, we agree that incorporation by 

reference was authorized to reduce the 

volume of material published in the 

Federal Register and the Code of 

Federal Regulations. However, as 

specified in the Federal Register 

Document Drafting Handbook, the 

Director of the OFR decides when an 

agency may incorporate material by 

reference. As MARPA is aware, the OFR 

files service information for public 

inspection on the workday before the 

date of publication of the AD at its office 

in Washington, DC. As stated in the 

Federal Register Document Drafting 

Handbook, when service information is 

filed for public inspection, anyone may 

inspect or copy file service information 

during the OFR’s hours of business. 

Further questions regarding publication 

of service information in the Federal 

Register or incorporation by reference 

should be directed to the OFR. 

In regard to MARPA’s request to post 

service information on the Department 

of Transportation’s DMS, we are 

currently in the process of reviewing 

issues surrounding the posting of 

service information on the DMS as part 

of an AD docket. Once we have 

thoroughly examined all aspects of this 

issue and have made a final 

determination, we will consider 

whether our current practice needs to be 

revised. No change to the final rule is 

necessary in response to this comment. 

Conclusion 

We have carefully reviewed the 

available data, including the comments 

received, and determined that air safety 

and the public interest require adopting 

the AD with the changes described 

previously. We have determined that 

these changes will neither increase the 

economic burden on any operator nor 

increase the scope of the AD. 

Costs of Compliance 

The following table provides the 

estimated costs for U.S. operators to 

comply with this AD. The average labor 

rate per hour is $80. 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Work hours Parts Cost per airplane 

Number of 

U.S.-registered 

airplanes 

Fleet cost 

AFM revision ......................... 1 None ........... $80 ........................................ 23 $1,840 

Determination if pitch trim 

control wheel moves.

1 None ........... 80 .......................................... 23 1,840. 

Optional replacement ............ 3 $264 ............ 504 ........................................ 23 11,592. 

Optional repetitive preventative maintenance tasks.3 None ........... 240, per task cycle ................ 23 5,520, per task cycle. 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

Section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, 

Aviation Programs, describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, 

‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES

1930 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We have determined that this AD will 

not have federalism implications under 

Executive Order 13132. This AD will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the States, on the relationship between 

the national government and the States, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify that this AD: 

(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and 

(3) Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

We prepared a regulatory evaluation 

of the estimated costs to comply with 

this AD and placed it in the AD docket. 

See the ADDRESSES section for a location 

to examine the regulatory evaluation. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

■ Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as 

follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) amends § 39.13 

by adding the following new 

airworthiness directive (AD): 

2006–26–10 Airbus: Amendment 39–14868. 

Docket No. FAA–2006–25670; 

Directorate Identifier 2006–NM–027–AD. 

Effective Date 

(a) This AD becomes effective February 21, 

2007. 

Affected ADs 

(b) None. 

Applicability 

(c) This AD applies to all Airbus Model 

A300 airplanes; certificated in any category; 

except the following airplanes: 

(1) Model A300 B4–220, A300 B4–203, and 

A300 B2–203 airplanes in a forward facing 

crew cockpit certified configuration; 

(2) Model A300 B4–601, B4–603, B4–620, 

and B4–622 airplanes; 

(3) Model A300 B4–605R and B4–622R 

airplanes; 

(4) Model A300 F4–605R and F4–622R 

airplanes; and 

(5) Airbus Model A300 C4–605R Variant F 

airplanes. 

Unsafe Condition 

(d) This AD results from a report of a 

sudden nose-up movement after 

disengagement of the autopilot in cruise. We 

are issuing this AD to ensure that the 

flightcrew is aware of the procedures for 

resetting the trim and pitch trim levers after 

each landing and to prevent failure of the 

servomotors of the pitch trim systems during 

flight. Failure of the servomotors of the pitch 

trim systems could result in uncommanded 

nose-up movement of the control surface of 

the pitch trim systems after disengagement of 

the autopilot in cruise. 

Compliance 

(e) You are responsible for having the 

actions required by this AD performed within 

the compliance times specified, unless the 

actions have already been done. 

Revision of Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) 

(f) Within 14 days after the effective date 

of this AD, do the action specified in 

paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD. 

(1) Revise the Normal Procedures section 

of the Airbus A300 Flight Manual to include 

the information in Airbus A300 Temporary 

Revision (TR) 4.03.00/04, Issue 02, dated 

November 18, 2003, as specified in the TR. 

Note 1: This may be done by inserting a 

copy of TR 4.03.00/04, Issue 02, in the AFM. 

When the TR or the statement specified in 

paragraph (f)(2) of this AD has been included 

in the general revisions of the AFM, the 

general revisions may be inserted in the 

AFM, provided the relevant information in 

the general revision is identical to that in the 

TR or paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. 

(2) Revise the Normal Procedures section 

of the Airbus A300 Flight Manual to include 

the following operational procedure. This 

may be done by inserting a copy of this AD 

in the AFM. 

‘‘APPROACH AND LANDING’’

PITCH TRIM 

—Set TRIM to 1° UP 

—Set both PITCH TRIM levers to OFF 

Note: Check pitch trim wheel and report 

any movement to maintenance.’’

Determination if Pitch Trim Control Wheel 

Moves 

(g) Following accomplishment of the AFM 

revision required by paragraph (f) of this AD: 

After each landing and before shutting down 

the engines, do the AFM procedures 

specified in Airbus A300 TR 4.03.00/04, 

Issue 02, dated November 18, 2003, or 

paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. 

Determination if Servomotor Moves 

(h) Before further flight after any 

movement reported in accordance with 

paragraph (g) of this AD, determine which 

servomotor moves the pitch trim control 

wheel, and do applicable other specified 

actions in accordance with Airbus A300 TR 

22–001, dated April 11, 2003, to Chapter 22–

23–00 of the Airbus A300 Fault Isolation 

Manual. 

Note 2: Airbus A300 TR 22–001 contains 

a typographical error. The TR incorrectly 

refers to ‘‘MM 22–23–39’’ as the appropriate 

source of service information for replacing 

the pitch trim actuator; the correct reference 

is ‘‘MM 22–23–29.’’

Optional Replacement of the Pitch Trim 

Servomotors 

(i) Replace the pitch trim servomotors in 

the attachment area of the horizontal and 

vertical stabilizers with new servomotors, in 

accordance with the Accomplishment 

Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A300–

22–0119, dated May 13, 2005. 

Note 3: Airbus Service Bulletin A300–22–

0119, dated May 13, 2005, refers to Thales 

Service Bulletin V1AM–22–005, Revision 01, 

dated July 27, 2005, as an additional source 

of service information for doing the 

replacement. 

Repetitive Preventative Maintenance Tasks 

(j) Within 12,000 flight hours after 

replacing one or both servomotors in 

accordance with paragraph (h) or (i) of this 

AD, or within 6 months after the effective 

date of this AD, whichever occurs later, do 

the preventative maintenance task of the 

pitch trim servomotor(s), in accordance with 

the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus 

Service Bulletin A300–22–0120, excluding 

Appendix 01, dated May 13, 2005. Repeat the 

preventative maintenance task thereafter at 

intervals not to exceed 12,000 flight hours. 

Note 4: Airbus Service Bulletin A300–22–

0120, dated May 13, 2005, refers to Thales 

Service Bulletin V1AM–22–006, Revision 01, 

dated July 26, 2005, as an additional source 

of service information for doing the 

preventative maintenance task. 

Removal of AFM Revision 

(k) After accomplishing the actions 

specified in paragraph (i) and the initial task 

in paragraph (j) of this AD, the AFM revision 

required by paragraph (f) of this AD may be 

removed, and the requirements of paragraphs 

(g) and (h) of this AD are no longer required. 

No Reporting 

(l) Although Airbus Service Bulletin A300–

22–0120, dated May 13, 2005, specifies to 

submit certain information to the 

manufacturer, this AD does not include that 

requirement. 

Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs) 

(m)(1) The Manager, International Branch, 

ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs 

for this AD, if requested in accordance with 

the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

(2) Before using any AMOC approved in 

accordance with § 39.19 on any airplane to 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 10 / Wednesday, January 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 1931 

which the AMOC applies, notify the 

appropriate principal inspector in the FAA 

Flight Standards Certificate Holding District 

Office. 

Related Information 

(n) French airworthiness directives F–

2003–291 R1, dated July 6, 2005, and F–

2005–109, dated July 6, 2005, also address 

the subject of this AD. 

Material Incorporated by Reference 

(o) You must use the service information 

in Table 1 of this AD to do the actions that 

are required by this AD, unless the AD 

specifies otherwise. If the optional 

replacement is done, you must use the 

service information in Table 2 of this AD to 

do the replacement. The Director of the 

Federal Register approved the incorporation 

by reference of these documents in 

accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. Contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point 

Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, 

France, for a copy of this service information. 

You may review copies at the Docket 

Management Facility, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., 

Room PL–401, Nassif Building, Washington, 

DC; on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or 

at the National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at the NARA, 

call (202) 741–6030, or go to http:// 

www.archives.gov/federal_register/

code_of_federal_regulations/

ibr_locations.html. 

TABLE 1.—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS

Service information Revision/issue level Date 

(1) Airbus A300 Temporary Revision 22–001 to Chapter 22–23–00 of the Airbus A300 Fault Isolation Manual.Original .................... April 11, 2003. 

(2) Airbus A300 Temporary Revision 4.03.00/04 to Airbus 300 Flight Manual .................................. Issue 02 ................... November 18, 2003. 

(3) Airbus Service Bulletin A300–22–0120, excluding Appendix 01 .................................................. Original .................... May 13, 2005. 

TABLE 2.—MATERIAL INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE FOR OPTIONAL ACTIONS

Service information Revision level Date 

Airbus Service Bulletin A300–22–0119 ............................................................................................... Original .................... May 13, 2005. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

December 21, 2006. 

Ali Bahrami, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. E7–399 Filed 1–16–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Office of Surface Mining Reclamation 

and Enforcement 

30 CFR Part 948 

[WV–111–FOR] 

West Virginia Abandoned Mine Lands 

Reclamation Plan 

AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM), 

Interior. 

ACTION: Final rule; approval of 

amendment. 

SUMMARY: We (OSM) are announcing the 

approval of an amendment to the West 

Virginia Abandoned Mine Lands 

Reclamation (AMLR) Plan under the 

Surface Mining Control and 

Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the 

Act). The amendment makes numerous 

revisions throughout the State’s AMLR 

Plan, and it is intended to update and 

improve the effectiveness of the West 

Virginia AMLR Plan. 

DATES: Effective date: January 17, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Roger W. Calhoun, Director, Charleston 

Field Office, Office of Surface Mining 

Reclamation and Enforcement, 1027 

Virginia Street, East, Charleston, West 

Virginia 25301, Telephone: (304) 347–

7158. E-mail: chfo@osmre.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background on the Abandoned Mine Lands 

Reclamation Program 

II. Submission of the Amendment 

III. OSM’s Findings 

IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments 

V. OSM’s Decision 

VI. Procedural Determinations 

I. Background on the Abandoned Mine 

Lands Reclamation Program 

The West Virginia AMLR Program 

was established by Title IV of SMCRA 

(30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.) in response to 

concerns over extensive environmental 

damage caused by past coal mining 

activities. The program is funded by a 

reclamation fee collected on each ton of 

coal that is produced. The money 

collected is used to finance the 

reclamation of abandoned coal mines 

and for other authorized activities. 

Section 405 of the Act allows States and 

Indian Tribes to assume exclusive 

responsibility for reclamation activity 

within the State or on Indian lands if 

they develop and submit to the 

Secretary of the Interior for approval, a 

program (often referred to as a plan) for 

the reclamation of abandoned coal 

mined lands. The West Virginia AMLR 

Plan was approved by OSM effective 

February 23, 1981. You can find 

additional information about the West 

Virginia AMLR Plan at 30 CFR 948.20, 

948.25, and 948.26. 

II. Submission of the Amendment 

By letter dated June 27, 2006 

(Administrative Record Number WV–

1469), the West Virginia Department of 

Environmental Protection (WVDEP), 

Office of Abandoned Mine Lands and 

Reclamation submitted an amendment 

to its AMLR Plan under SMCRA (30 

U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). The amendment 

consists of numerous changes 

throughout the AMLR Plan, some of 

which concern the AML Enhancement 

Rule. In its submittal of the amendment, 

the WVDEP stated that the revision 

incorporates the AML Enhancement 

Rule at 30 CFR Parts 707 and 874, as 

published by OSM in the Federal 

Register on Friday, February 12, 1999 

(64 FR 7470–7483). 

In its submittal letter, the State noted 

that the amendment also contains minor 

organizational and operational changes. 

Minor changes, such as organizational 

changes, re-numbering of sections, 

updating the name of departments or 

agencies, deletion of historical narrative, 

and the correction of typographical and 

grammatical errors, are non-substantive 

changes that do not affect the basis of 

the original approval of the West 

Virginia AMLR Plan. Therefore, we did 

not identify such non-substantive 

changes in our published proposed rule 

notice. 

We announced receipt of the 

proposed amendment in the September 

18, 2006, Federal Register (71 FR 

mstockstill on PROD1PC61 with RULES