alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donovan Jones, Chief Executive Officer of CounterPath
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|/s/ Donovan Jones                     | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Donovan Jones                         | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 

March 10, 2011

I, David Karp, Chief Financial Officer of CounterPath
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|/s/ David Karp                                   | 
|------------------------------------------------ | 
|David Karp                                       | 
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary | 
|                                                 | 
|March 10, 2011                                   | 

---
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Matthew A. Jones                                    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Matthew                A. Jones                                        |
| Title: | Chief                Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | August                13, 2007                                         |
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AMP Productions, Ltd. on Form 10-QSB
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Mills, Chief Executive
Officer, President, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: August 1, 2006     By /s/ Thomas Mills
                         Thomas E. Mills
                         President & Chief Financial Officer
1

FILED

November 25, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE, )

et al., )

)

Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) Davidson Chancery

)

)

Vs. ) Supreme Court

) No. 01S01-9711-CH-00242

)

BROOK THOMPSON, in his official )

capacity as the State Election )

Coordinator, et al., )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

O R D E R

We granted this expedited appeal pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-3-

201(d) in order to determine a question of unusual public importance--whether 1997

Tenn. Pub. Acts, ch. 98, (“the Act”), violates the Tennessee Constitution. The

Chancery Court held that the Act is constitutional. We conclude, however, that the

Act violates Article II, § 17 of the Tennessee Constitution because the body of the

Act is broader than its caption. Accordingly, we reverse. A full opinion based on

this order will follow.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
No. 46701.

#### Protests 65281-K, etc., of New York Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the opera glasses are similar to those the subject of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 74). In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 228 (b) as claimed.
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Luna Innovations Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kent A. Murphy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|                                                           
|/s/ KENT A. MURPHY                                         
|Kent A. Murphy, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive Officer

May 9, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAMON ALLGIRE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1680 MCE GGH P

vs.

WARDEN R.A. CASTRO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On November 9, 2005, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. On

September 26, 2005, defendants filed a motion to dismiss, after which, on October 11, 2005,

defendants filed an amended declaration of service; however, that re-service was upon his prior

address. Plaintiff may not have received the pending motion, in light of his most recent change

in address. Although plaintiff failed to serve his most recent change of address, in order to

obviate further delay, the court will now direct defendants to once again re-serve plaintiff with

their motion to dismiss, this time at the address set forth in docket entry # 21, within ten (10)

days. 

Notwithstanding the exception to the requirement of service of the notice of

change of address the court has made in this instance, plaintiff is advised that every document

submitted to the court for consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. 

Case 2:04-cv-01680-MCE -GGH Document 22 Filed 12/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Documents not to be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. 

If an attorney has filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendant, then documents

submitted by plaintiff must be served on that attorney and not on the defendants. Every

document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must

include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to defendants

or their attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants must re-serve their motion to dismiss, originally filed on

September 26, 2005 (and re-served at his former address on October 11, 2005), within ten days

from the date of this order upon plaintiff at his current address as set forth in docket entry # 21.

2. Plaintiff will have 30 days from the date of re-service to file any opposition;

failure to do so shall be deemed a waiver of opposition;

3. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in

this action properly, and failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may

result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

DATED: 12/21/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

allg1680.rsv

 

Case 2:04-cv-01680-MCE -GGH Document 22 Filed 12/22/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Curtis J. Clawson, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hayes LemmerzInternational, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: June 9, 2004                                      /s/ Curtis J. Clawson   Curtis J. Clawson   Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer  
38
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9517]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3696]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 022607E]


International Whaling Commission; 59th Annual Meeting; 
Announcement of Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), NationalOceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the date and location of the public 
meeting being held prior to the 59th annual International Whaling 
Commission (IWC) meeting.

DATES: The public meeting will be held April 5, 2007, at 1 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the NOAA Science Center Room, 
1301 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheri McCarty, 301-713-9090, Extension 
183.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary of Commerce is charged
    with the responsibility of discharging the domestic obligations of 
the United States under the International Convention for the Regulation 
of Whaling, 1946. The U.S. Commissioner has responsibility for the 
preparation and negotiation of U.S. positions on international issues 
concerning whaling and for all matters involving the IWC. He is staffed 
by the Department of Commerce and assisted by the Department of State, 
the Department of the Interior, Marine Mammal Commission, and by other 
agencies.
    Once the draft agenda for the annual IWC meeting is completed, it 
will be posted on the IWC Secretariat's website at http://www.iwcoffice.org.
    Each year NOAA holds a meeting prior to the annual IWC meeting to 
discuss the tentative U.S. positions for the upcoming IWC meeting. 
Because the meeting discusses U.S. positions, the substance of the 
meeting must be kept confidential. Any U.S. citizen with an 
identifiable interest in U.S. whale conservation policy may 
participate, but NOAA reserves the authority to inquire about the 
interests of any person who appears at a meeting and to determine the 
appropriateness of that person's participation.
    Persons who represent foreign interests may not attend. These 
stringent measures are necessary to protect the confidentiality of U.S. 
negotiating positions and are a necessary basis for the relatively open 
process of preparing for IWC meetings.
    The meeting will be held at 1 p.m. at the NOAA Science Center Room, 
1301 East West Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910. Photo identification 
is required to enter the building.

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to the Cheri McCarty, 301-713-9090 by 
March 26, 2007.

    Dated: February 26, 2007.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-3696 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**





**As
      Adopted Pursuant To**





**Section
      906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Gary
      G. Brandt , Chief Executive Officer of Solomon Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





•    
      the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





•    
      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for
      the periods presented therein.








/s/
      Gary G. Brandt


Gary
      G.
      Brandt


Chief
      Executive Officer


(principal
      executive officer)


August
      20, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES P. DeFAZIO,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-04-1358 DFL GGH

vs. (Consolidated Master Case Number)

HOLLISTER, INC., et al.,

Defendants. 

 /

KATHLEEN ELLIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-05-0559 DFL GGH

vs.

HOLLISTER, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

_______________________________/

BRENDA DIMARO & HOLLIE LAVICK,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-05-1726 DFL GGH

vs.

HOLLISTER, INC., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

_______________________________/

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 157 Filed 11/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The undersigned is in receipt of the parties’ proposed discovery plan and

plaintiff’s request to supplement the discovery plan. In order to have a meaningful discovery

order issue, the discovery events in the case cannot be permitted to outrun the ability of an order

to control them. Therefore, discovery is stayed in all captioned cases until the court issues its

combined discovery order. That is, no further discovery requests shall issue until further order of

the court, and for pending discovery requests, no responses need be made until further order of

the court.

The undersigned recognizes the need to issue a discovery order expeditiously, and

has placed this matter at the “top of his pile.” While the undersigned cannot promise that a more

emergent matter will not temporarily displace the need to issue a discovery order in these cases,

or that there are no unrelated events on the court’s calendar, every effort will be made to

continuously work on the discovery order. 

DATED: 11/28/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

defazio.ord

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 157 Filed 11/28/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLOS TOMAS GARCIA,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1779 MCE DAD P

vs.

KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondents’ July 19, 2005, request for leave to file a supplemental answer is

granted;

2. Petitioner may file and serve a reply within thirty days after service of this

order;

3. The Clerk shall file the fourteen-page supplemental answer submitted as

Attachment 1 to respondents’ July 19, 2005 request, excluding the attachment cover page; and

4. Kathy Mendoza-Powers is substituted for Tom Carey as respondent.

DATED: July 21, 2005.

DAD:13

garc1779.suppans

Case 2:04-cv-01779-MCE -DAD Document 18 Filed 07/21/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1



|                                                                                                       |  |                   
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------
|LOGO                                                                                                   |  | FAX (303) 623-4258
|                                                                                                      
|621 SEVENTEENTH STREET        SUITE 1550        DENVER, COLORADO
80293        TELEPHONE (303) 623-9147

CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT
COMPANY, L.P.

We consent to the filing of our summary reserve report dated April 14, 2010, as Exhibit 99.1 to the PrimeEnergy
Corporation amendment on Form 10-K/A to the PrimeEnergy Corporation annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.



Very Truly YoursLOGORYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


Denver, Colorado

February 23, 2011



|                           |  |                           |  |                    |  |                   
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------
|1100 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3800 |  | HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218 |  | TEL (713) 651-9191 |  | FAX (713) 651-0849
|1200, 530-8TH AVENUE, S.W. |  | CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 358  |  | TEL (403) 262-2799 |  | FAX (403) 262-2790
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTIAGO SOTO

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0571 FCD GGH P

vs.

WARDEN D.L. RUNNELS,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 17, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunctive relief

which goes to the merits of his complaint. Defendant is directed to file any opposition to the

motion within 15 days of the date of this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: 5/3/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

soto0571.rsp

Case 2:04-cv-00571-FCD-GGH Document 19 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 1
July 1, 2015 

Mr. Robert Hixon 

Western Data Systems Inc. (CNI) 

2161 West Anderson Lane 

Austin, TX 78757 

Dear Mr. Hixon: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request 

We entered your April 22, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Western Data Systems Inc. 

(CNI) into the public docket (No. FAA−2015−1210), but we are unable to process your 

request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of 

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of 

the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division

Enclosure