alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 434 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 434

 To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, to 
  modify requirements under that Act relating to exemptions, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2023

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Rubio, Mr. 
 Hagerty, Mr. Risch, and Mrs. Fischer) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938, as amended, to 
  modify requirements under that Act relating to exemptions, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Adversary Influence, 
Disinformation, and Obscured Foreign Financing Act of 2023'' or the 
``PAID OFF Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF EXEMPTIONS UNDER FARA.

    (a) Definition.--Section 1 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act 
of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 611) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(q) The term `country of concern' means--
            ``(1) the People's Republic of China;
            ``(2) the Russian Federation;
            ``(3) the Islamic Republic of Iran;
            ``(4) the Democratic People's Republic of Korea;
            ``(5) the Republic of Cuba; and
            ``(6) the Syrian Arab Republic.''.
    (b) Exemptions.--Section 3 of the Foreign Agents Registration Act 
of 1938, as amended (22 U.S.C. 613), is amended, in the matter 
preceding subsection (a), by inserting ``, except that the exemptions 
under subsections (d)(1) and (h) shall not apply to any agent of a 
foreign principal that is a country of concern'' before the colon.
    (c) Sunset.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) shall 
terminate on October 1, 2026.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

Statement re computation of per share earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                              Year ended               Year ended            Year ended
                                                            September 30,             September 30,         September 30,
                                                                 1999                      1998                 1997
<S>                                                                <C>                    <C>                    <C>
Net income in thousands                                              $13,708                 $5,004                   $790


Weighted average shares outstanding                                7,447,081              7,799,507              7,588,094

Assumed exercise of stock options,
  weighted average of incremental shares                             206,410                171,758                260,895

Assumed purchase of stock under stock
  purchase plan, weighted average                                      3,934                 94,024                 17,761

Diluted shares - adjusted weighted-average shares
and assumed conversions                                            7,657,425              8,065,289              7,866,750


Basic earnings per share                                               $1.84                  $ .64                  $ .10

Diluted earnings per share                                             $1.79                  $ .62                  $ .10
</TABLE>
Case No. 14,453.

#### UNITED STATES v. ANDREWS.

[Cited in U. S. t. Abbott, Case No. 14.416. Nowhere reported: opinion not now accessible.]
No. 53538.

protest 141152-K (Tampa).

#### Imports, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10258]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4012]



[[Page 10258]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 731-TA-895 (Review)]


Pure Magnesium From China

Determination

    On the basis of the record \1\ developed in the subject five-year 
review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) 
determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 
U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act), that revocation of the antidumping duty 
order on certain pure magnesium from China would be likely to lead to 
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the 
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).
    \2\ Commissioners Jennifer A. Hillman and Irving A. Williamson 
not participating. Commissioner Dean A. Pinkert was not a member of 
the Commission at the time of the vote.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background

    The Commission instituted this review on October 2, 2006 (71 FR 
58001) and determined on January 5, 2007 that it would conduct an 
expedited review (72 FR 3876, January 26, 2007).
    The Commission transmitted its determination in this investigation 
to the Secretary of Commerce on March 1, 2007. The views of the 
Commission are contained in USITC Publication 3908 (March 2007), 
entitled Pure Magnesium from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-895 
(Review).

    Issued: March 1, 2007.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. E7-4012 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit
31.2
  CERTIFICATIONS
   I, Thomas
Hagan, certify that:
  1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of  Patient Portal
Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "registrant'');
  2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
  3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
  4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
  a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
  b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
  5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a)
              All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
  and
  b)
              Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.
    Date:
      August 13, 2008
  
 
 By:
              /s/  Thomas
      HaganTHOMAS
      HAGANChief
      Financial Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10702)

#### American Roland Corporation *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 104816; 104815.

(Decided April 1, 1964)

*Eugene R. PioTcrell*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following- stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, defendant, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. The merchandise marked “A” and initialled ECA by Examiner E. C. Alfano on the invoices herein consists of Pyridoxine Hydrochloride exported from Denmark to the United States, during the period from March 31, 1962 through May 14,1962, which was appraised on the basis of foreign value, as that value is defined in Section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Section 8 of the Customs Simplification Act of 1938.

> 2. Pyridoxine Hydrochloride is on the final list promulgated by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, published as T.D. 54521, in the Federal Register, issue of January 20,1958.

> *4833. There is no foreign value as defined, supra, for such or similar merchandise, and that the merchandise should have been appraised on the basis of export value, as defined in Section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, supra.

> 4. No Pyridoxine Hydrochloride was sold or offered for sale for consumption in Denmark.

> 5. At the time of exportation of the merchandise marked “A” as aforesaid, the price at which such merchandise was freely offered for sale for- exportation to the United States, including the cost for all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was:

> Period Dutiable value Basis

> 3/31/62 to 5/14/62 US $58.00 per kilo OIF Export Value

On tlie agreed facts, I find and bold export value, as that value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such values for the respective periods of exportation were as follows:

> *Period Value*

> 3/31/62 to 5/14/62 U.S. $58.00 per kilo CIP

Judgment will issue accordingly.
## Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Skye Lynn Hargett, Appellant

No. 06

- 19

- 00161

- CR v.
The State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 8th District Court of Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 1726154 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered by Ju stice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment and the bill of costs by changing the assessment of attorney fees from $800.00 to $300.00, and we modify the Order to Withdraw Funds by changing the amount of court costs, fees and/or fines from $1

, 654.00 to
$1

, 154.00. As modified, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. We note that the appellant, Skye Lynn Hargett, has adequately indicated h er inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOV EMBER 18, 2019 BY ORDER OF THE COURT JOSH R. MORRISS, III CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST: Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.2   PATIENT PORTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
         (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Thomas Hagan, Financial Officer of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 of the
Registrant (the "Report"):

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a)[15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Registrant.


Dated:  1/31/2007                        /s/ THOMAS HAGAN
                                         -----------------------
                                         Thomas Hagan
                                         Chief Financial Officer

















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with AmendmentNo. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EnerNOC, Inc. (the “Company”), forthe quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Amended Report”), the undersigned, Neal C.Isaacson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuantto Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code, that:

(1)The Amended Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Amended Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

Date: October29, 2007
|   | By:    | /s/ Neal C. Isaacson |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|
|   |   | Neal C. Isaacson          |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EnerNOC,Inc. and will be retained by EnerNOC, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>   5
       
<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Nov-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                Nov-30-1996
<CASH>                                              395
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    23,758
<ALLOWANCES>                                        206
<INVENTORY>                                      18,426
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4,168
<PP&E>                                           17,477
<DEPRECIATION>                                    8,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   62,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23,835
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                          4,249
<OTHER-SE>                                       27,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     62,832
<SALES>                                          86,759
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 86,759
<CGS>                                            71,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    71,113
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  5,941
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   7,773
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2,797
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               2,797
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4,976
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.31
        

</TABLE>
SANFORD v. RED LOBSTER, et al., Case No. CIV S. 04-1535 DFL CMK 

Stipulation to Extend the Date to Take the Deposition of Mickey Barrett 

Page 1 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MARTIN H. ORLICK, SBN 83908 

JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MARMARO 

Two Embarcadero Center 

5

th Floor 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

(415) 398-8080 

Attorney for Defendant 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES SANFORD, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

GMRI, INC. DBA RED LOBSTER, and 

DOES 1 through 10, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV.S 04-1535 DFL CMK 

STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE 

DATE TO TAKE THE DEPOSITION 

OF MICKEY BARRETT 

The parties hereby stipulate to extend the date to conduct the deposition 

of defense expert Mickey Barrett. The current date by which all depositions must 

be completed is August 24, 2005. 

Plaintiff’s counsel had originally noticed Mr. Barrett’s deposition to occur 

on July 8, 2005. However, due to a death in Mr. Barrett’s family, the parties 

agreed to postpone Mr. Barrett’s deposition. Defense counsel agreed to 

produce Mr. Barrett at a later date. 

LYNN HUBBARD III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD, IV, SBN 212970 

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE 

CHICO, CA. 95926 

(530) 895-3252 

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-01535-DFL-CMK Document 16 Filed 08/04/05 Page 1 of 2
SANFORD v. RED LOBSTER, et al., Case No. CIV S. 04-1535 DFL CMK 

Stipulation to Extend the Date to Take the Deposition of Mickey Barrett 

Page 2 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Counsel met and conferred to agree upon a mutually convenient date. 

The deposition of Mickey Barrett was re-noticed for August 4, 2005. The parties 

are circulating settlement documents. Defense counsel is unavailable for 

deposition on August 4, 2005, counsel agreed to reschedule Mr. Barrett’s 

deposition. 

Defense counsel is on vacation from August 15, 2005 through August 23, 

2005. The earliest date to conduct the deposition is August 26, 2005. 

Therefore, the parties respectfully request that the discovery cut-off be 

extended thirty (30) days for the sole purpose of taking the deposition of Mickey 

Barrett. 

If Mickey Barrett is not produced for deposition within the thirty (30) days, 

defendant agrees to withdraw Mr. Barrett as an expert and therefore cannot rely 

on his opinions, testimony and/or written statements at trial or for the defense of 

this action. 

 July 29, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III 

 /s/ Lynn Hubbard, III 

 LYNN HUBBARD, III 

 July 29, 2005 JEFFER, MANGELS, BUTLER & MARMARO 

 Signature on File 

 MARTIN H. ORLICK 

IT IS SO ORDERED: 

That the current discovery cut-off be extended for thirty (30) days to take 

the deposition of Mickey Barrett. Accordingly, the date to take Mickey Barrett’s 

deposition is extended to September 24, 2005. 

Dated : August 3, 2005 /s/ David F. Levi________________

 JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01535-DFL-CMK Document 16 Filed 08/04/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of CEO and CFO Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Great Plains Energy
Incorporated (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2009, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Michael J. Chesser, as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Terry Bassham, as Executive Vice President - Finance
and Strategic Development and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his
knowledge:





(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Michael J. ChesserName:
              Title:
            Michael
      J. Chesser
              Chairman
      of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
            February
      25, 2010/s/
      Terry BasshamName:
              Title:
            Terry
      Bassham
              Executive
      Vice President – Finance and Strategic Development and Chief
      Financial OfficerDate:
            February
      25, 2010





This
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and
is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure
document.  This certification shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to
liability under that section.  This certification shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.1 is
expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such
filing.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Great Plains Energy Incorporated and will
be retained by Great Plains Energy Incorporated and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Order entered September 16 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 21 - 00518 - CV THE STATE OF TEXAS , ET AL. , Appellant s

V. LBJ/BROOKHAVEN INVESTORS, L.P. , Appellee O n Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 20 - 01518

O RDER Before the Court is appellants’ September 14, 2021 unopposed motion for an extension of time to file their brief on the merits. We GRANT the mot ion and extend the time to October 15, 2021

. /s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE