alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered August 6 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 21
- 00428
- CV
MARCUS JARROD PAYNE , Appellant

V. STACY ELEY (PAYNE) , Appellee On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 20
- 00663

O RDER As directed to do so, appellant has filed written verification he has requested the reporter’s record. Because appellant filed a statement of inability to pay costs
in the trial court and nothing before us reflects he’s been ordered to pay costs, we
ORDER Donna Kindle, Official Court Reporter for the 303rd Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record without costs within thirty days of the date of
this order. See T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 145.We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms.

Kindle and all parties.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
No. 50022.

#### Protests 32731-K, etc., of Copeland & Thompson, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe; J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Copeland & Thompson*v. *206*United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.2

                       AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT made and entered into this June
29, 1999, by and between HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., a Georgia corporation
("Employer"), and MARSHALL B. HUNT ("Employee");

         WHEREAS, Employer and Employee entered into that certain Employment
Agreement dated April 3, 1998 ("Employment Agreement"), and the parties desire
to amend the Employment Agreement in the manner set forth below;

         NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual
promises and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto, intending to be
legally bound, hereby agree as follows:

         SECTION 1

                  Section 3.1(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended,
effective as of May 12, 1999, by changing the amount of the Salary to the
amount of Two Hundred Seventy Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($270,000.00) in the
first sentence in Section 3.1(a). Commencing on May 12, 1999, for all purposes
under the Employment Agreement, the Salary shall be Two Hundred Seventy
Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($270,000.00).

         SECTION 2

                  Except as expressly amended above, all other provisions in
the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. This
Amendment is intended by the parties hereto to be the final expression of their
agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof and is the complete and
exclusive statement of the terms thereof, notwithstanding any representations,
statements, or agreements to the contrary heretofore made. This Amendment may
be modified only by a written instrument signed by all of the parties hereto.
This Amendment shall be deemed to be made in, and in all respects shall be
interpreted, construed, and governed by and in accordance with, the laws of the
State of Georgia. No provision of this Agreement shall be construed against or
interpreted to the disadvantage of any party hereto by any court or other
governmental or judicial authority or by any board of arbitrators by reason of
such party or its counsel having been deemed to have structured or drafted such
provision. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to
Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.

                                          HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.


                                          By:
                                             -----------------------------------
                                             William E. Peterson, Jr., President


                                             -----------------------------------
                                             MARSHALL B. HUNT
Case No. 7,877.

#### KNEE v. AMERICAN STEAMSHIP CO.

[1 Wkly. Notes Cas. 15.]

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 2, 1874.

Seaman’s Wages — Promotion—Right to Increased Wages.

[One having signed articles at a rating of twenty-five dollars per month was on the voyage advanced to a position having a rating of thirty dollars per month, the holder of which had been disrated ten dollars per month. He was promised that the ten dollars should be added to his pay each month. *Held,*that he was entitled to thirty dollars per month, the pay of the position filled by him.]

[See The Alonzo, Case No. 258.]

Libellant shipped on respondent’s steamship Pennsylvania, at Philadelphia, June 25, and signed articles as “second pantryman,” at 823 per month. When four or five days out at sea, the chief steward put him in the *751place of the “second baker,” who had proved incompetent, saying that the second baker had been disrated $10 per month, which would be added to his (libellant’s) wages. The wages of second baker were $30 per month. On arrival of vessel at Philadelphia, respondents offered to pay off libellant at the rate for which he shipped. This he refused, and libelled for wages at the rate of $33 per month.

E. P. Pugh, for libellant, cited The William Martin [Case No. 17,698]; The Exchange [Id; 4,594]; The Porcupine, 1 Hagg. Adm. 381; The Providence, Id. 391; The Gondolier, 3 Hagg. Adm 191; Mitchell v. The Orozimbo [Case No. 9,667].

E. Wilson, Jr., and Mr. Ward, for respondents, cited Harris v. Watson, Peake, 72; Allen v. Hallett [Case No. 223].

THE COUKT

(CADWALADER, District Judge)

held, that, libellant having been advanced to a position, the wages of which were higher than those for which he signed articles, and having filled that position satisfactorily for the remainder of the voyage, he should have been paid off at the rate of the position'to which he was advanced. Decree accordingly for libellant for wages at rate of $30, with costs.
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael J. SINDRAM, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 01-6135.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 18, 2001.

Michael J. Sindram, pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Michael J. Sindram appeals the district court’s marginal order denying his motion for a hearing and appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
No. 49587.

#### Protest 12569-K of Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. (Portland, Maine).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In view of Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. (31 C. C. P. A. 102, C. A. D. 256) the claim for free entry under paragraph 1803 was sustained.
Exhibit 23.1.a

CONSENT OF COUNSEL

       As General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Great Plains Energy Incorporated, I have reviewed the statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and consent to the incorporation by reference of such statements in the Company's previously-filed Form S-3 Registration Statements (Registration No. 333-97263 and Registration No. 333-114486) and Form S-8 Registration Statements (Registration No. 33-45618 and Registration No. 333-120172).

/s/Mark G. English
Street Address (888) 651-6851, (903) 723-0331 Mailing Address 

1000 N. Church St. Fax: (888) 651-6851 P.O. Box 1157 

Palestine, Texas 75801 Email: jeff@coelawfirm.com Palestine, Texas 75802-1157 

January 26, 2015 

Katrina McClenny 

Tyler Court of Appeals 

1517 West Front Street, Suite 354 

Tyler, Texas 75702 

Re: In Re Innovation Resource Solution, LLC, Appeal No. 12-15-00015-CV 

Dear Clerk: 

Please be advised that although a final trial was scheduled in the trial court in the abovereferenced original proceeding, the trial court judge, the Honorable Deborah Oakes Evans, 

stayed the case pending resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus pending before the Court 

of Appeals. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Cordially, 

/s/ Jeffrey L. Coe 

Jeffrey L. Coe 

Attorney at Law 

JEFFREY L. COE

ATTORNEY AT LAW

ACCEPTED

12-15-00015-CV

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

1/26/2015 12:17:01 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 1/26/2015 12:17:01 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4511 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4511

 To provide for the crediting of funds received by the National Guard 
                  Bureau as reimbursement from States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2024

Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Crapo, Ms. 
    Klobuchar, Mr. Daines, Mr. Risch, and Mr. Vance) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the crediting of funds received by the National Guard 
                  Bureau as reimbursement from States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Guarding Readiness Resources Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF FUNDS RECEIVED BY NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU AS 
              REIMBURSEMENT FROM STATES.

    Section 710 of title 32, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Treatment of Reimbursed Funds.--Any funds received by the 
National Guard Bureau from a State, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 
the District of Columbia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands as reimbursement 
under this section for the use of military property--
            ``(1) shall be credited to--
                    ``(A) the appropriation, fund, or account used in 
                incurring the obligation; or
                    ``(B) an appropriate appropriation, fund, or 
                account currently available for the purposes for which 
                the expenditures were made; and
            ``(2) may only be used by the Department of Defense for the 
        repair, maintenance, or other similar functions related 
        directly to assets used by National Guard units while operating 
        under State active duty status.''.
                                 <all>
```
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 11, 2011 | By:  | /s/ Jing Wang                                            |
|-----------------------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |      | Jing WangChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RUBEN J. BONTTY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1491 GEB KJM P

vs.

CAPTAIN S. J. VANCE, et al., 

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

On July 29, 2004, plaintiff filed a complaint for violation of civil rights under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. With his complaint, plaintiff submitted an incomplete application to proceed in

forma pauperis. On August 31, 2004, the court ordered plaintiff to submit a new application to

proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff was specifically informed that the “certificate” portion of

the application appearing on page 2 must be completed and, with his application, plaintiff must

submit a certified copy of his prisoner trust account statement for the preceding six months. 

Plaintiff was informed that failure to comply with the court’s August 31 order would result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

On September 7, 2004, plaintiff submitted a second application to proceed in

forma pauperis. However, the “certificate” section found on page 2 is, again, incomplete and

plaintiff did not submit the required copy of his prisoner trust account statement.

Case 2:04-cv-01491-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 27, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

bont1630.fifp

Case 2:04-cv-01491-GEB -KJM Document 6 Filed 06/28/05 Page 2 of 2
# Comments on All Five of EPA's White Papers on Metha ne and VOC Emissions in the Oil and Natural Gas Sector

gas s white papers regarding methane and VOC emissions in the oil and natural ’ EPA Attached please find comments on all five of sector, released April 15, 2014. of the Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Counc il, Clean Air Task Force, and We submit these comments on behalf ).” Commenters “ Earthworks. Exhibits will follow in consecutive ema ils (together,
Any questions or concerns should be directed to bot h Nathan Matthews and Andres Restrepo: Nathan Matthews Staff Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 2nd St., Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 

### (415) 977-5695 Nathan.Matthews@sierraclub.org Andres Restrepo Associate Attorney Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 50 F Street, NW, Eighth Floor Washington, DC 20001 

### (202) 650-6073 andres.restrepo@sierraclub.org Best regards, Natalie Spiegel

-- **Natalie Spiegel Legal Assistant**  **Sierra Club Environmental Law Program 85 Second Street, Second Floor**  

## Spiegel <natalie.spiegel@sierraclub.org> Natalie Tue 6/17/2014 12:00 AM To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; Cc: Nathan Matthews <nathan.matthews@sierraclub.org>; A ndres Restrepo <andres.restrepo@sierraclub.org>; 

##  1 attachment Sierra Club et al- Comments on EPA Methane White Pap ers FINAL.pdf; 

## Page **1 of**  **2 Comments on All Five of EPA's White Papers on Metha...** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 27/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/** **San Francisco, CA 94105**

**natalie.spiegel@sierraclub.org 415-977-5638**  

## Page **2 of**  **2 Comments on All Five of EPA's White Papers on Metha...** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 27/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AMP Productions, Ltd. on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Mills, Chief
Executive Officer, President, Principal Accounting Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: October 31, 2008                By  /s/ Thomas Mills
                                          Thomas E. Mills
                                          President,  Chief  Executive  Officer,
                                          Chief  Financial  Officer,  and
                                          Principal Accounting Officer
No. 66813.

#### Ephron Gallery *v.*United States,

protest 61/1055 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of artistic antiquities and that the regulations have now been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-30748 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LIONEL BROWN, also known as Fat, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 01-CR-268-2

-------------------- Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Lionel Brown has requested leave to withdraw as counsel and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Brown has filed a response to counsel’s motion, arguing that: (1) the district court erred in increasing his offense level by two pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1 and (2) the increase constitutesNo. 02-30748 -2- an upward departure, which is appealable under the terms of the plea agreement. The waiver of appeal provision contained in the plea agreement prohibits Brown from raising his substantive claim on appeal. See United States v. Gaitan , 171 F.3d 222, 223 (5th Cir. 1999). Our independent review of the briefs and the record discloses no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
ANDERS MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
**EXHIBIT 12.1**

 

**EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY**

 

**STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGSTO FIXED CHARGES**

**(dollars in thousands)**

 
|                                                                            |   | **Year Ended March 31,** |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|                                                                            |   | **2001**                 |   | **2002** |   | **2003** |   |
| Income before income taxes and  extraordinary item                              |   | $                        | 19,021 |   | $ | 5,809 |   | $ | 16,160 |   |
| Fixed charges to be added back to earnings:                                     |   |                     |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest and debt expense, including  capitalized interest                      |   | 46,034                   |   | 43,025 |   | 47,753 |   |
| Rentals (one-third of all rent and related  costs charged to income)            |   | 6,601                    |   | 7,118 |   | 7,219 |   |
| Total fixed charges                                                             |   | 52,635                   |   | 50,143 |   | 54,972 |   |
| Less capitalized interest                                                       |   | —                   |   | 316 |   | 464 |   |
| Earnings before income taxes and fixed  charges, excluding capitalized interest |   | $                        | 71,656 |   | $ | 55,636 |   | $ | 70,668 |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                                              |   | 1.36                     |   | 1.11 |   | 1.29 |   |

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.A CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2005, of
El Paso Production Holding Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lisa A. Stewart, President and Chief Executive
Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Lisa A. StewartLisa A. Stewart 
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)May 12, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Production Holding Company and will be retained by El Paso Production Holding Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.