10264 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices 

human environment, the NRC staff 

concludes that the proposed action is 

the preferred alternative. 

Agencies and Persons Consulted 

NRC provided a draft of this 

Environmental Assessment to the State 

of Alabama, Department of Radiation 

Control for review on October 31, 2006. 

On November 11, 2006, the State of 

Alabama Department of Radiation 

Control responded by e-mail. The State 

agreed with the conclusions of the EA, 

and otherwise had no substantive 

comments. 

The NRC staff has determined that the 

proposed action is of a procedural 

nature and will not affect listed species 

or critical habitat. Therefore, no further 

consultation is required under Section 7 

of the Endangered Species Act. The 

NRC staff has also determined that the 

proposed action is not the type of 

activity that has the potential to cause 

effects on historic properties. Therefore, 

no further consultation is required 

under Section 106 of the National 

Historic Preservation Act. 

III. Finding of No Significant Impact 

The NRC staff has prepared this EA in 

support of the proposed action. On the 

basis of this EA, the NRC finds that 

there are no significant environmental 

impacts from the proposed action, and 

that preparation of an environmental 

impact statement is not warranted. 

Accordingly, the NRC has determined 

that a Finding of No Significant Impact 

is appropriate. 

IV. Further Information 

Documents related to this action, 

including the application for license 

amendment and supporting 

documentation, are available 

electronically at the NRC’s Electronic 

Reading Room at http://www.nrc.gov/ 

reading-rm/adams.html. From this site, 

you can access the NRC’s Agencywide 

Document Access and Management 

System (ADAMS), which provides text 

and image files of NRC’s public 

documents. The documents related to 

this action are listed below, along with 

their ADAMS accession numbers. 

1. NUREG–1757, ‘‘Consolidated 

NMSS Decommissioning Guidance’’; 

2. Title 10, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 20, Subpart E, 

‘‘Radiological Criteria for License 

Termination’’; 

3. Title 10, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 51, ‘‘Environmental 

Protection Regulations for Domestic 

Licensing and Related Regulatory 

Functions’’; 

4. NUREG–1496, ‘‘Generic 

Environmental Impact Statement in 

Support of Rulemaking on Radiological 

Criteria for License Termination of NRCLicensed Nuclear Facilities’’; 

5. August 1, 2002 U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers (USACE) to NRC 

memorandum (ML031490516); 

6. October 2002 ‘‘Airborne 

Radiological Survey—Main Post and 

Pelham Range, Walkover Radiological 

Survey at Rideout Field and Anomaly 

Surveys on Main Post and Pelham 

Range, Groundwater Investigation—

Burial Mound at Rideout Field’’

(Package ML030100136); 

7. June 2003 ‘‘Final Completion 

Report, Site Investigation at LaGarde 

Park, Anniston, Alabama’’

(ML052710179); 

8. August 25, 2003 NRC Inspection 

Report No. 01–02861–05/03–01 

(ML032380139); 

9. October 13, 2003, STEP, Inc. to 

USACE, ‘‘Removal Action at LaGrange 

Park, Phase II Memorandum’’

(ML052710136); 

10. February 10, 2004, Shaw Group, 

Inc. response to NRC Inspection Report 

01–02861–05/03–01 (ML042100101); 

11. NRC letter dated June 24, 2004, 

acknowledging the receipt of the Army’s 

Airborne Survey Report 

(ML041770403); 

12. May 2004 ‘‘Final Report for 

Removal Action at LaGarde Park’’ (TBS); 

13. April 2005 ‘‘Final Remedial 

Investigation Report, Expanded Site 

Investigation at LaGarde Park, Anniston, 

Alabama’’ (ML061940256); 

14. April 26, 2005, Department of the 

Army request for termination of 

Materials License No. 01–02861–05 

(ML051430344); 

15. August 2005 ‘‘Draft Final 

Remedial Action Report, Final Interim 

Removal Action at LaGarde Park, 

Anniston, Alabama’’ (ML052840081); 

16. November 4, 2005 ‘‘Final 

Remedial Action Report, Final Interim 

Removal Action at LaGarde Park, 

Anniston, Alabama’’ (ML061940267 ); 

17. December 14, 2005 NRC 

Inspection Report 03017584/2005001 

(ML053480096); 

18. May 2006 ‘‘Proposed Plan for the 

LaGarde Park Site of the Former Fort 

McClellan, Anniston, Alabama’’

(ML061940273); and 

19. June 2006 ‘‘Final Decision 

Document for the LaGarde Park Site of 

the former Fort McClellan, Anniston, 

Alabama’’ (ML061940269). 

If you do not have access to ADAMS, 

or if there are problems in accessing the 

documents located in ADAMS, contact 

the NRC Public Document Room (PDR) 

Reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–

415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov. 

These documents may also be viewed 

electronically on the public computers 

located at the NRC’s PDR, O 1 F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, MD 20852. The PDR 

reproduction contractor will copy 

documents for a fee. 

Dated at King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, this 

27th day of February, 2007. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Marie Miller, 

Chief, Materials Security & Industrial Branch, 

Division of Nuclear Materials Safety, Region 

I. 

[FR Doc. E7–4096 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRADE REPRESENTATIVE 

Determination Regarding Waiver of 

Discriminatory Purchasing 

Requirements With Respect to Goods 

and Services Covered by Chapter 9 of 

the Dominican Republic-Central 

America-United States Free Trade 

Agreement for the Dominican Republic 

AGENCY: Office of the United States 

Trade Representative. 

ACTION: Determination Regarding 

Waiver of Discriminatory Purchasing 

Requirements under the Trade 

Agreements Act of 1979. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 1, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean 

Heilman Grier, Senior Procurement 

Negotiator, Office of the United States 

Trade Representative, (202) 395–9476. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 

5, 2004, the United States and the 

Dominican Republic entered into the 

Dominican Republic-Central AmericaUnited States Free Trade Agreement 

(‘‘the CAFTA–DR’’). Chapter 9 of the 

CAFTA–DR sets forth certain 

obligations with respect to government 

procurement of goods and services, as 

specified in Annex 9.1.2(b)(i) of the 

CAFTA–DR. On August 2, 2005, the 

President signed into law the 

Dominican Republic-Central AmericaUnited States Free Trade Agreement 

Implementation Act (‘‘the Act’’) (Pub. L. 

No. 109–53, 119 Stat. 462). In section 

101(a) of the Act, the Congress approved 

the CAFTA–DR. The CAFTA–DR will 

enter into force on March 1, 2007, for 

the Dominican Republic. 

Section 1–201 of Executive Order 

12260 of December 31, 1980 delegated 

the functions of the President under 

Sections 301 and 302 of the Trade 

Agreements Act of 1979 (‘‘the Trade 

Agreements Act’’) (19 U.S.C. 2511, 

2512) to the United States Trade 

Representative. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 44 / Wednesday, March 7, 2007 / Notices 10265 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(5). 

5See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54709 

(November 3, 2006), 71 FR 65847 (November 9, 

2006) (SR–Amex–2006–72) (Order Approving a 

Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No 1 

Thereto, and Notice of Filing and Order Granting 

Accelerated Approval to Amendment No. 3, to 

Adopt New Rules to Implement on a Pilot Basis an 

Initial Version of AEMI, Its Proposed New Hybrid 

Market Trading Platform for Equity Products and 

Exchange Traded Funds). 

Determination: In conformity with 

sections 301 and 302 of the Trade 

Agreements Act, and in order to carry 

out U.S. obligations under the CAFTA–

DR, I hereby determine that: 

1. The Dominican Republic is a 

country, other than a major 

industrialized country, which, pursuant 

to the CAFTA–DR, will provide 

appropriate reciprocal competitive 

government procurement opportunities 

to United States products and services 

and suppliers of such products and 

services. In accordance with Section 

301(b)(3) of the Trade Agreements Act, 

the Dominican Republic is so 

designated for purposes of Section 

301(a) of the Trade Agreements Act. 

2. Accordingly, beginning on March 1, 

2007, with respect to eligible products 

(namely, those goods and services 

covered under the CAFTA–DR for 

procurement by the United States) of the 

Dominican Republic and suppliers of 

such products, the application of any 

law, regulation, procedure, or practice 

regarding government procurement that 

would, if applied to such products and 

suppliers, result in treatment less 

favorable than that accorded—

(A) To United States products and 

suppliers of such products; or 

(B) To eligible products of another foreign 

country or instrumentality which is a party 

to the Agreement on Government 

Procurement referred to in section 101(d)(17) 

of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (19 

U.S.C. 3511(d)(17)) and suppliers of such 

products, shall be waived. This waiver shall 

be applied by all entities listed in the 

Schedule of the United States to Section A 

of Annex 9.1.2(b)(i) and in List A of Section 

C of Annex 9.1.2(b)(i) of the CAFTA–DR. 

3. The Trade Representative may 

modify or withdraw the designation in 

paragraph 1 and the waiver in paragraph 

2. 

Dated: February 28, 2007. 

Susan C. Schwab, 

United States Trade Representative. 

[FR Doc. E7–4020 Filed 3–6–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3190–W7–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–55368; File No. SR–Amex–

2007–26] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice 

of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness 

of Proposed Rule Change To Revise 

the AEMI and AEMI–One Rules 

Relating to the Publishing of Manual 

Quotations and Re-Enabling Auto-Ex 

February 28, 2007. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on February 

27, 2007, the American Stock Exchange 

LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with 

the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change as described in 

Items I, II, and III below, which Items 

have been substantially prepared by the 

Exchange. Amex has filed this proposal 

pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the 

Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(5) thereunder,4

which renders it effective upon filing 

with the Commission. The Commission 

is publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Exchange proposes to adopt 

changes to its AEMI and AEMI–One 

rules to address a situation that the 

Exchange has encountered in publishing 

its manual, non-firm quote following a 

tolerance breach that disables the 

Exchange’s automatic execution 

functionality (‘‘auto-ex’’). Under certain 

circumstances, displaying the price of 

the national best bid (‘‘NBB’’) or 

national best offer (‘‘NBO’’) (as the case 

may be) as part of such a non-firm quote 

(as provided in the current AEMI and 

AEMI–One rules) may result in the 

Exchange publishing a locked or crossed 

quotation. To avoid this situation, the 

Exchange is proposing to amend Rules 

128A–AEMI–One(g) and 128A–AEMI(g) 

to provide instead for using the price of 

the best bid, offer, or order (as the case 

may be) in AEMI, rather than the NBB 

or NBO, under these circumstances. 

Related changes to Rules 123–AEMI–

One(h) and 123–AEMI(h) would clarify 

that all such non-firm quotes 

disseminated through the AEMI 

platform are indicative only. In 

addition, the Exchange is proposing the 

addition of a phrase to each of Rules 

128A–AEMI–One(g) and 128A–AEMI(g) 

to clarify that the obligation of the 

Specialist is to ‘‘attempt to’’ pair off the 

remainder of an aggressing order that 

results in a locked or crossed AEMI 

Book to re-enable auto-ex prior to the 

expiration of a ten-second time period. 

The Exchange also is proposing an 

unrelated change to the text of Rules 

1A–AEMI–One(b) and 1A–AEMI(b) to 

clarify the applicability of crossreferences in the Exchange’s rules to a 

legacy rule that is no longer applicable 

due to having been superseded by a 

corresponding AEMI or AEMI–One rule. 

The text of the proposed rule change 

is available on the Amex’s Web site at 

http://www.amex.com, at the 

Exchange’s principal office, and at the 

Commission’s Public Reference Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, 

Amex included statements concerning 

the purpose of and basis for the 

proposed rule change and discussed any 

comments it received on the proposed 

rule change. The text of these statements 

may be examined at the places specified 

in Item IV below. Amex has prepared 

summaries, set forth in sections A, B, 

and C below, of the most significant 

aspects of such statements. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and the 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange has recently adopted 

two sets of rules in connection with the 

operation of its new hybrid market 

trading platform for equity products and 

exchange-traded funds, designated as 

AEMISM (the ‘‘Auction and Electronic 

Market Integration’’ platform). The 

initial version of AEMI is referred to as 

‘‘AEMI–One’’ and is currently 

operational on a pilot basis 5 through the 

day prior to the final date set by the 

Commission for full operation of all 

automated trading centers that intend to 

qualify their quotations for tradeVerDate Aug<31>2005 18:25 Mar 06, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\07MRN1.SGM 07MRN1

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES