alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
I, Dana L. Dabney, Chief Financial Officer of the Circle Group Holdings, Inc.
certify, pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                 (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  May 12, 2004                               /s/ Dana L. Dabney
                                                   ------------------
                                                   Dana L. Dabney
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR CLINTON GIVENS, et al.,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-04-1647 FCD PAN P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed January 19, 2006, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on

defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way

to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:04-cv-01647-FCD-PAN Document 20 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: March 8, 2006. 

/001; give1647.fus

Case 2:04-cv-01647-FCD-PAN Document 20 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005, of
El Paso Production Holding Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, D. Mark Leland, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ D. Mark LelandD. Mark LelandExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)August 5, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Production Holding Company and will be retained by El Paso Production Holding Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
February 17, 1950

No. 54044.

Suit 4605.

#### United States *v.*Olavarria & Co., Inc.

C. D. 1110 affirmed November 7, 1949. C. A. D. 417.
No. 60835.

#### Walter Hart, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 270852-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 61855.

#### Davies, Turner & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 307301-K (New York).

*532Opinion by

J ohnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0                  26,299
<SECURITIES>                                         0                  16,214
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                 103,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 149,338
<PP&E>                                               0                  30,319
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  19,780
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 214,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  23,318
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                   3,343
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 214,569
<SALES>                                        120,900                 339,736
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0                       0
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,705                 308,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   152                     441
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 126                     339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,404                  31,789
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,904                  13,466
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,500                  18,323
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10                     .28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10                     .28


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.




                               /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


                               /s/ Christine R. Piano
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Christine R. Piano
                               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Date: February 9, 2010
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1


                           EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY

                     LISTING OF THE COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                        DATE                      STATE/
                                                        NATURE OF     ACQUIRED        %         COUNTRY OF
NAME                                                    BUSINESS     OR CREATED     OWNED      INCORPORATION
----                                                    --------     ----------     -----      -------------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>            <C>        <C>
Kilsby Jorgensen Steel & Aluminum, S.A. de C.V.           Metal       06/18/92       100%      Mexico
                                                       Distributor

Kilsby Jorgensen Steel & Aluminium Ltd.                   Metal       05/03/90       100%      United Kingdom
                                                       Distributor

Earle M. Jorgensen (Canada) Inc. (formerly Kilsby         Metal       11/13/90       100%      Canada
  Jorgensen Steel & Aluminum Inc.)                     Distributor

Stainless Insurance Ltd.                                 Captive      03/20/96       100%      Bermuda
                                                        Insurance
</TABLE>


                                       54
Exhibit 32.2

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    

In connection with the Annual Report of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), theundersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that: 

     (1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Dated:  March 5, 2004 |  | /s/ C. Park    Shaper                                        |  |
|---------------------------------|--|--------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|                                 |  | C. Park Shaper    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

----

----
September 14, 1949

No. 53553.

protest 107732-K.

#### Thomson Trading Co. *v.*United States,

Motion of 'Government for rehearing denied by order of Chief Judge Oliver and Judge Mollison. — Judge Cole dissenting on jurisdictional grounds, citing *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 158, C. D. 1175), *Fuchs Shoe Corp.*v. *United States*(id. 338, Abstract 53250), and *W. R. Zanes & Co.*v. *United States*(id. 339, Abstract 53251).
No. 49642.

#### Protests 58456-K, etc., of J. H. Spiegel, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel sole crepe rubber similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *F. Lester Kittle, Inc.*(31 C. C. P. A. 233, C. A. D. 276) was held entitled to free entry as claimed.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4082 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  






 
 DELAWARE SEAL 2011 CORPORATE SMART SAND, INC. AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR (Brooklyn, NY)
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY, LLC BY COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: VICE PRESIDENT OF ACCOUNTING, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CONTROLLER AND SECRETARY transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney
upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. Witness the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly
authorized officers. Dated: FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE PER SHARE, OF SMART SAND, INC. IS THE RECORD HOLDER OF THIS CERTIFIES THAT SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS CUSIP 83191H 10 7 INCORPORATED UNDER
THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SHARES COMMON STOCK SMART SAND, INC. 







 



 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT
UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15. Signature(s) Guaranteed: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN
EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. NOTICE: Dated, to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Attorney of the common stock
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Shares For value received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL
SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. (State) Act under Uniform Gifts to Minors (Cust) (Minor) as tenants in common UNIF GIFT MIN ACT Custodian as tenants by the
entireties as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common TEN COM TEN ENT JT TEN The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out
in full according to applicable laws or regulations:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEROME DARNELL WILSON, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1170 LKK KJM P

vs.

CSP SACRAMENTO, 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 7, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01170-LKK -KJM Document 8 Filed 05/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 7, 2005, are adopted in full;

and 

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied without prejudice for failure

to pay the filing fee or submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. 

DATED: May 12, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/wils1170.800.hc

Case 2:04-cv-01170-LKK -KJM Document 8 Filed 05/13/05 Page 2 of 2
Order entered June 21, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00745-CV

No. 05-13-00746-CV

IN RE SENRICK WILKERSON, Relator

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. W10-01183-J

ORDER

The Court has before it relator’s June 18, 2013 “request for court of inquiry hearing.” 

The Court construes the document as a motion for rehearing and DENIES the motion.

/s/ JIM MOSELEY 

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEROLD WASHINGTON : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

NATIONAL RAILROAD

PASSENGER CORP. : NO. 02-4451

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2004 , it is Ordered

that an oral argument on the motion for summary judgment will be

held on February 19, 2004 at 10 :00 a.m. in Courtroom 15-B.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: Michael Owens 

 Deputy Clerk CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, Sr. J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Case 2:02-cv-04451-CG Document 28 Filed 02/04/2004 Page 1 of 1
(Reap. Dec. 10738)

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 383; 349.

(Decided April 28, 1964)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*Jo'hn W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by counsel for the parties hereto:

> That the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated above consists of wire strand exported from Japan during the period beginning January 28, 1982 and ending February 25, 1962; that wire strand is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that on or immediately preceding the date of exportation of each shipment of wire strand covered by each of the appeals to reappraisement enumerated above, the prices at which wire strand, such as or similar to the wire strand described on the invoices covered by the instant appeals to reappraisement were freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal market of Japan in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $241. per metric ton for wire strand of *7Ae*inch diameter (United States funds).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals to re-appraisement enumerated above are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and the entry file covered by each appeal.

*539On tlie agreed facts, I find that tbe proper basis for appraisement of tbe merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402 (b) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that sucb statutory value therefor is $241 per metric ton for wire strand of %6-inch diameter (United States funds).

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN LUCAS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

DONNY YOUNGBLOOD; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-17420 

D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00654-DAD-JLT 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 18, 2019**

Before: CANBY, TASHIMA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. 

John Lucas appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 

action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 

12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 26 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-17420 

The district court properly dismissed Lucas’s action because Lucas failed to 

allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Allen v. Gold Country Casino, 

464 F.3d 1044, 1048 (9th Cir. 2006) (18 U.S.C. § 242 is a “criminal statute[] that 

do[es] not give rise to civil liability”); Jackson v. City of Bremerton, 268 F.3d 646, 

653 (9th Cir. 2001) (“Neither a municipality nor a supervisor . . . can be held liable 

under § 1983 where no injury or constitutional violation has occurred.”); Vill. of 

Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000) (per curiam) (elements of an 

equal protection “class of one” claim); Ellis v. City of San Diego, 176 F.3d 1183, 

1189 (9th Cir. 1999) (the California Penal Code “sections do not create enforceable 

individual rights”); see also Hebbe, 627 F.3d at 341-42 (although pro se pleadings 

are liberally construed, a plaintiff must allege facts sufficient to state a plausible 

claim).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing Lucas’s first 

amended complaint without leave to amend because amendment would have been 

futile. See Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1041 (9th 

Cir. 2011) (setting forth standard of review and explaining that a district court may 

dismiss without leave to amend when amendment would be futile).

Contrary to Lucas’s contention, the district court did not grant defendants’ 

motion for a protective order. 

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 
3 18-17420 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents not presented to the district court. See

United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not 

presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY HARRIS, )

) 2:04-cv-1149-WBS-CBK

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER

v. )

)

CHICO NISSAN, INC. and RAYMOND ) 

L. BOWEN, et al., )

)

Defendant. )

)

Since the confidential settlement conference statements

reveal it would not be fruitful to hold a settlement conference in

this action, the settlement conference scheduled for February 24,

2006, is vacated.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01149-DFL-CMK Document 85 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 1