alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1. 
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. 
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
      Company.




Date:
                November 8, 2006
            By:
            */s/
              John B. Gallagher*Name:
                  John B. Gallagher
                Title:
                    Co-Chief Executive Officer Date:
                  November 8, 2006
              By:
              */s/
                Harry D. Shields*Name:
                      Harry D. Shields
                      Title:
                        Co-Chief Executive
                        Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
as adopted),  Robert L. Walker, Chief Executive Officer of International Leisure
Hosts,  Ltd.  (the  "Company"),  hereby  certifies  that,  to  the  best  of his
knowledge:

1.              The Company's  Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
                March 31,  2003,  to which this  Certification  is  attached  as
                Exhibit  99.1 (the "Annual  Report"),  fully  complies  with the
                requirements  of  section  13(a)  or  15(d)  of  the  Securities
                Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.              The information  contained in the Annual Report fairly presents,
                in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations  of the  Company at the end of the period  covered by
                the Annual  Report and results of  operations of the Company for
                the period covered by the Annual Report.


/s/ Robert L. Walker

Robert L. Walker
Chief Executive Officer
June 15, 2003










                                       32
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUY T. STRINGHAM,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S- 04-1530 DFL GGH P

vs.

R. LEE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. Pursuant to the scheduling order, filed on November 18, 2005, defendants, on April 21,

2006, filed a timely motion for summary judgment. 

In light of the pending dispositive motion, the court will vacate the July 28, 2006

pretrial conference and October 23, 2006 jury trial dates currently set in the November 18, 2005

scheduling order. The dates set for the filing of pretrial statements by the parties in the

scheduling order are also hereby vacated. 

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-01530-JAM-GGH Document 44 Filed 05/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment is due within thirty

days. Any reply will be due seven days after service of the opposition. The dates for the pretrial

conference, including the dates for the filing of pretrial statements, and for a jury trial will be reset, if appropriate, upon adjudication of the pending motion for summary judgment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED

DATED: 5/3/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

stri1530.vac

Case 2:04-cv-01530-JAM-GGH Document 44 Filed 05/04/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY MARSHALL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1694 LKK EFB P

vs.

GARY R. STANTON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner without counsel seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. Defendants request the court to vacate the pretrial and trial dates.

Pursuant to the October 27, 2005, schedule plaintiff had until July 21, 2006, to

file and serve a pretrial statement, defendants had until August 4, 2006, to file and serve a

pretrial statement, pretrial conference is set for August 11, 2006, and trial is set for October 31,

2006.

Defendants’ motion to dismiss is pending.

Accordingly, IT HEREBY IS ORDERED that defendants’ July 25, 2006,

application to vacate the pretrial dates and the trial date is granted.

DATED: August 29, 2006.

\004

\mars1694.vac sched

Case 2:04-cv-01694-LKK -EFB Document 106 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 1
----

|                                    |   | Three months ended |      |   | Three months ended |   |
|-----------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|-----------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                                    |   | March 31, 2011               |      |   | March 31, 2010               |   |
|                                    |   |                         |      |   |                         |   |
| Income available to common stockholders |   | $                            | 36,014    |   |                         | $      | 140,090 |   |
|                                    |   |                         |      |   |                         |   |   |   |
| Weighted average shares outstanding     |   |                         | 2,670,143 |   |                         |   | 2,664,875 |   |
|                                    |   |                         |      |   |                         |   |   |   |
| Basic earnings per share                |   | $                            | 0.01      |   |                         | $      | 0.05 |   |
|                                    |   |                         |      |   |                         |   |   |   |
| Income for diluted earnings per share   |   | $                            | 36,014    |   |                         | $      | 140,090 |   |
|                                    |   |                         |      |   |                         |   |   |   |
| Total weighted average common shares    |   |                         |      |   |                         |   |   |   |
| and equivalents outstanding for         |   |                         |      |   |                         |   |   |   |
| diluted computation                     |   |                         | 2,670,143 |   |                         |   | 2,664,875 |   |
|                                    |   |                         |      |   |                         |   |   |   |
| Diluted earnings per share              |   | $                            | 0.01      |   |                         | $      | 0.05 |   |

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-380]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and 
Texas)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 13, 2007, at 9:30 
a.m. central time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-912-1227, or 
(414) 231-2365.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, February 13, 2007, at 9:30 a.m. Central Time via a telephone 
conference call. You can submit written comments to the Panel by faxing 
to (414) 231-2363, or by mail to Taxpayer Advocacy Panel, Stop1006MIL, 
PO Box 3205, Milwaukee, WI 53201-3205, or you can contact us at http://www.improveirs.org. This meeting is not required to be open to the 
public, but because we are always interested in community input, we 
will accept public comments. Please contact Mary Ann Delzer at 1-888-
912-1227 or (414) 231-2365 for additional information.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 8, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-380 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1 Attachment 

Here is our Network Assessment as requested. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

 

FW: 2010 Network Assessment 

BRIGETTE TOLLSTRUP 

to: 

Katherine Hoag 

05/02/2011 03:00 PM 

Hide Details 

From: "BRIGETTE TOLLSTRUP" <BTOLLSTRUP@airquality.org>

To: Katherine Hoag/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

History: This message has been replied to and forwarded. 

NetworkAssessment2010 SMAQMD.pdf
Exhibit 32.2

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P. (the Partnership) for the quarter ending September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Chandler, Chief Financial
Officer of Magellan Midstream Holdings GP, LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.



|                                                                
|----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                
|/s/ John D. Chandler                                            
|John D. Chandler, Chief Financial Officer Date: November 6, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership
and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PAMELA LEWIS, SBN 116430

COOK BROWN LLP

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 425

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 442-3100

Facsimile: (916) 442-4227

Attorneys for Defendant

SHAM SIDHER and ROMA SIDHER dba QUIZNO’S

JULIE RANEY, SBN 176060

MCDONOUGH HOLLAND & ALLEN

555 CAPITOL MALL, 9 Floor

th

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 444-3900

Facsimile: (916) 444-3249

Attorneys for Defendant

JOHN A FORSTER and LISA FORSTER,

Trustees of the FORSTER FAMILY TRUST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SANFORD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

JOHN A. FORSTER AND LISA

FORSTER, TRUSTEES OF THE

FORSTER FAMILY TRUST, SHAM

SIDHER AND ROMA SIDHER DBA

QUIZNO’S; and DOES 1 through 10,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV.S. 04-1826 MCE GGH

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Case 2:04-cv-01826-MCE -GGH Document 26 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S04-1826 MCE GGH, is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to all parties pursuant to the

request for dismissal filed on September 21, 2005.

Dated: September 28, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01826-MCE -GGH Document 26 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The time for a response from the remaining defendants, CMF-Vacaville and the

California Department of Corrections, has not yet expired.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUY T. STRINGHAM,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S- 04-1530 DFL GGH P

vs.

R. LEE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 

1983. On February 25, 2005, defendants Herrera, Grannis, Allen, Thumser, Schwartz, O’Ran,

Fisher, Providence, and Lee filed their answer to plaintiff’s complaint. On March 3, 2005,

plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction asking the court to grant the relief

preliminarily that he seeks on a permanent basis by his complaint. Defendants have filed no

response to plaintiff’s motion. Moreover, a response to the complaint is overdue from defendant

Bradanick,1 who signed a waiver of service on February 15, 2005, which was filed in this court

on February 23, 2005. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

Case 2:04-cv-01530-JAM-GGH Document 22 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. Defendants Herrera, Grannis, Allen, Thumser, Schwartz, O’Ran, Fisher,

Providence, and Lee must file any response to plaintiff’s March 3, 2005 motion for preliminary

relief within 20 days; and

 2. Defendant Bradanick must show cause, within 10 days, for his failure to

respond timely to plaintiff’s complaint.

DATED: 5/31/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

strin1530.rsp

Case 2:04-cv-01530-JAM-GGH Document 22 Filed 05/31/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 8686]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02599]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property 
Release at Manchester-Boston Regional Airport in Manchester, NH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for Public Comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(d), 
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from 
Manchester-Boston Regional Airport in Manchester, NH to waive the 
surplus property requirements for approximately 19 acres of airport 
property located at Manchester-Boston Regional Airport in Manchester, 
NH. The subject parcels have been used for non-aeronautical purposes 
for over 30 years under temporary relief of surplus property 
requirements. It has been determined through study and master planning 
that the subject parcels will not be needed for aeronautical purposes 
as they are not contiguous to the airport proper. Full and permanent 
relief of the surplus property requirements on these specific parcels 
will allow the airport and its tenants on these parcels to make the 
necessary and aviation-compatible improvements to the parcels. All 
revenues through the leasing of the parcels will continue to be subject 
to the FAAs revenue-use policy and dedicated to the maintenance and 
operation of the Manchester-Boston Regional Airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 8, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this document to Mr. Barry J. Hammer at the 
Federal Aviation Administration, 12 New England Executive Park, 
Burlington, Massachusetts 01803, Telephone 781-238-7625.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Documents are available for review by 
appointment by contacting Mr. David Bush, Telephone 603-624-6539 or by 
contacting Mr. Barry J. Hammer, Federal Aviation Administration, 16 New 
England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts, Telephone 781-238-
7625.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on January 29, 2013.
Mary T. Walsh,
Manager, Airports Division, New England Region.
[FR Doc. 2013-02599 Filed 2-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
No. 58005.

protests 202575-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Winslow & Co., Division of Winslow Bros. & Smith Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliveb, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #12-2003 Limited
Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing
General Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      13, 2008
No. 54653.

#### The Wing On Co. *v.*United States,

protest 96004-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial the defendant contended that the merchandise is dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1538 by similitude to-manufactures of ivory. A Government chemist’s report received in evidence (exhibit 2) states that the sample of the merchandise (exhibit 1) is composed wholly of synthetic phenolic resin with a little pigment but that the resin does not serve as a binding agent. In this connection, the records in Abstracts 45795, 49907, 51306, and 51959 were incorporated herein. The testimony of the examiner in the case of *Wenchow Importing Co.*v. *United States,*Abstract 54651, decided concurrently herewith, was admitted in evidence herein. Said testimony failed to establish that the imported articles were similar to ivory in material, texture, quality, and use, as claimed, and failed to support classification by similitude. *Roovers Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 53, C. D. 1190) cited. On the record presented and following the cited authorities, it was held that the defendant failed to establish its claim that these articles are dutiable under paragraph 1538. The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

ANA MARIA MARTEL

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2826

Attorneys for Federal Defendants

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANDY ADAMS, ET AL.,

Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL.

Defendants, counter-claimants. 

No. CIV. S-04-0979-DFL-CMK

ORDER DISMISSING ANDY ADAMS AND HEATHER ADAMS

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, Andy Adams and Heather Adams, and the

United States of America, Andy Adams and Heather Adams are dismissed as parties herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 10/6/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00979-JAM -CMK Document 79 Filed 10/06/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 54033.

#### Browne Vintners Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 133039-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Greg Pelling, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CounterPath
Corporation for the three-month period ended October 31, 2007 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
CounterPath Corporation

Date: December 17, 2007.

/s/Greg
PellingGreg
PellingChief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
  the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
  written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to CounterPath
  Corporation and will be retained by CounterPath Corporation and furnished to
  the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---