alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8661)

Entry No. 852456.

#### Otto Kadmon *v.*United States

(Decided September 26, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant *Attorney*General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above consists of electric bulbs imported from Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the export values at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of Japan in the usual wholesale quantity in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including the costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States are the appraised value less the item covering buying commission as stated on the invoice. There was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the appraised value, less the item covering buying commission as stated on the invoice.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES P. DeFAZIO,

Plaintiff,

v. NO. CIV. S-04-1358 LKK/GGH

HOLLISTER, INC., et al,

Defendants.

 /

KATHLEEN ELLIS,

Plaintiff,

v. NO. CIV. S-05-559 LKK/GGH

HOLLISTER, INC., et al,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

BRENDA DIMARO and HALLIE LAVICK,

Plaintiffs,

v. NO. CIV. S-05-1726 LKK/GGH

HOLLISTER, INC., et al,

Defendants.

_________________________________/

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 131 Filed 09/12/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

ORDER OF RECUSAL AND REASSIGNMENT

It appearing to the undersigned, the judge to whom this case

is presently assigned for all purposes, that the provisions of 28

U.S.C. § 455 mandate the disqualification of the undersigned,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the undersigned recuses himself as

the judge to whom this case is assigned.

DATED: September 6, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED:

1. All currently scheduled dates in the above-captioned

action are VACATED;

2. The Clerk of the Court reassign this case to another

judge for all further proceedings, making appropriate adjustments

in the assignments of civil cases to compensate for such

reassignment; and

4. This case is REASSIGNED to the Honorable

David F. Levi.

DATED: September 11, 2006.

DAVID F. LEVI

Chief United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 131 Filed 09/12/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 131 Filed 09/12/06 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of Internet Security Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) forthe period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certifiesthat:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ THOMAS E. NOONAN    |   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|--------|
| Thomas E. Noonan        |   |
| Chairman, President and |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| August 9, 2005     |   |

 

----
**Exhibit
          32.2**
 
 **Certification
          Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**
 
 **As
          Adopted Pursuant To**
 
 **Section
          906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
 
 I,
          Samuel
          F. Occhipinti, Chief Financial Officer of Solomon Technologies, Inc. (the
          “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
          18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:
 
 •  the
          Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30,
          2006, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
          on the
          date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 •  the
          information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
          the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the
          periods
          presented therein.
 
 
 /s/
          Samuel F. Occhipinti
 Samuel
          F.
          Occhipinti
 Chief
          Financial Officer
 (principal
          financial and accounting officer)
 May
          15,
          2007
No. 48487.

#### Petition 6146-R of Rich’s, Inc. (Atlanta).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The court was satisfied from the circumstances sur-, rounding the transaction, as disclosed by the record, that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES L. DAVIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1390 LKK EFB P

vs.

TERESA A. SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 22, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion for an order directing he be given

access to the law library, legal supplies and his legal materials. On May 26, 2006, the court

issued a notice requiring defendants to respond. On July 26, 2006, defendants filed a motion for

clarification of the May 26, 2006, notice.

Defendants must respond to plaintiff’s May 22, 2006, motion for a preliminary

injunction.

////

////

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01390-LKK -EFB Document 39 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, defendants' opposition to the motion for a preliminary injunction is

due not more than 21 days from the date of this order; plaintiff's reply is due seven days after the

opposition is served. See Local Rule 78-230(m).

So ordered.

Dated: August 29, 2006.

\davi1390.45

Case 2:04-cv-01390-LKK -EFB Document 39 Filed 08/29/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARA FLAMM : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.; JOSHUA SARNER; : NO. 02-4302

LEONARD SARNER, ESQUIRE; :

JODI H. BROWN, M.D.; JOHN MATUSAVAGE; :

JOHN DOE PROCESS SERVER, INDIVIDUALLY AND :

AS AGENT FOR SARNER 7 ASSOCIATES, P.C.; :

JOSHUA SARNER, ESQUIRE; LEONARD SARNER, :

ESQUIRE; AND JODI H. BROWN, M.D. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th dayofMarch, 2003, after conducting a telephone discovery conference

with counsel in the above-captioned matter, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall answer

Defendant John Matusavage’s interrogatories directed to Plaintiff and his request for production of

documents to Plaintiff within five (5) days of the date of this Order.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 45 Filed 03/10/2003 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

Arthur Clinton Givens, et al.,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. 04-1647 FCD PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

Sacramento County, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoMarch 21, 2005, an order served on plaintiff Givens was

returned by the postal service as undeliverable. Plaintiff has

failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182(d), which requires a

party appearing pro se inform the court of any address change.

Accordingly, the court hereby recommends plaintiff Givens’

claims be dismissed without prejudice and he be terminated as a

plaintiff herein. L.R. 83-183(b) (dismissal appropriate where

pro se plaintiff fails to notify court of current address within

60 days of return of mail by U.S. Postal Service). 

Case 2:04-cv-01647-FCD-PAN Document 13 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Within 20 days after being

served with these findings and recommendations, either plaintiff

may file written objections. The document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” 

The district judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings

and recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: June 29, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01647-FCD-PAN Document 13 Filed 06/30/05 Page 2 of 2
,-~ South Coast

~≥-‘ Air QualIty Management District

AQMD 21865 E. Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 (909) 396-2000’ http://www.aqmd.gov

May 16, 1997

RECEIVED Mr. Harry A. Metzger, Manager

Rule Evaluation Section MAY 22

Emissions Assessment Branch

Air Resources Board RULE EVALUATION SECTION

P 0 Box 2815 AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Sacramento, CA 95812

Dear Mr. Metzger:

SiP Submittal: Rule 1610 - Old-Vehicle Scrapping

Attached you will find information pertaining to Rule 1610, Old-Vehicle Scrapping, which was

amended by the District Board on May 9, 1997. We are requesting that, upon your review and

concurrence, the attached information be provided to EPA for its review and inclusion in the SIP.

Rules 1401 and 1402, referenced in the amendment ofRule 1610, are not to be considered part of

the SIP.

Ifyou have any questions on this submittal, please contact Dave Coel at (909) 396-3143.

Barry R. Wallerstein, D.Env.

Deputy Executive Officer

Planning, Transportation &

Information Management

BRW:HH:DRC:Lfl

Attachments:

SIP Completeness Checklist

Clean and strikeout copies of amended rule

Referenced Documents

Proof ofPublication

Signed Board Resolution

APCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form

SIP Approvability Checklist - Enforceability

StaffReport (Board Letter)

cc: Dan Meer/EPA Region IX (w/o attachments)

Geri.Koerner/SCAQMD (w/o attachments)

Ed PupkaJSCAQMD (w/o attachments)

Henry Hogo/SCAQMD (w/o attachments)

Dave C0eIJSCAQMD (w/o attachments)

Rule 1610 Administrative File (w/o attachments)

SIP File (w/attachments)

(SIP/XI: 1610) —

1947• 1997 ) •~ YEARS OF PROGRESS TOWARD CLEAN AIR

CLEAN AIR IS EVERY BODY’S BUSINESS
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4351 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4351

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize certain poison 
                           control programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Poison Control Centers 
Reauthorization Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF POISON CONTROL PROGRAMS.

    (a) National Toll-Free Number and Other Communication 
Capabilities.--Section 1271(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 300d-71(c)) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2020 through 
2024'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2025 through 2029''.
    (b) Promoting Poison Control Center Utilization.--Section 1272(c) 
of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-72(c)) is amended by 
striking ``fiscal years 2020 through 2024'' and inserting ``fiscal 
years 2025 through 2029''.
    (c) Poison Control Center Grant Program.--Section 1273(g) of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-73(g)) is amended by striking 
``fiscal years 2020 through 2024'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2025 
through 2029''.

            Passed the Senate July 11 (legislative day, July 10), 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4351

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize certain poison 
                           control programs.
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Christopher J. Zyda, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Luminent MortgageCapital, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 7, 2004     By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZYDA       Christopher J. Zyda   Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Dolan Chemical Laboratory 4001 Bixby Road Groveport, OH 43125 T: 614-836-4221, Audinet 210-4221 F: 614-836-4168, Audinet 210-4168 http://aepenv/labs 

### Water Analysis Location: Mountaineer Plant Report Date: 7/24/2012 Form REP-703 Rev. 0, 4/2012



### Sample Number: 122993-001 Date Collected: 07/11/2012 08:40 Date Received:7/11/2012 

### Trip Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 0.6 0.5 BSS EPA 1631E 0.2 07/20/2012 

### Sample Number: 122993-002 Date Collected:07/11/2012 08:40 Date Received:7/11/2012 

### Field Blank Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 0.8 0.5 BSS EPA 1631E 0.2 07/20/2012 

### Sample Number: 122993-003 Date Collected:07/11/2012 08:40 Date Received:7/11/2012 

### Plant Outfall #001 Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 3.6 2 BSS EPA 1631E 0.8 07/20/2012 

### Sample Number: 122993-004 Date Collected:07/11/2012 08:05 Date Received:7/11/2012 

### CPS Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 124 10 BSS EPA 1631E 4 07/20/2012 

### Sample Number: 122993-005 Date Collected:07/11/2012 08:05 Date Received:7/11/2012 

### Bioreactor Effluent Units Parameter Result RL Analysis By Analysis Date/Time Method MDL Data Qual ng/L Mercury, Hg 4.9 5 BSS EPA 1631E 2 07/20/2012 J

Mountaineer Plant, 122993 Page 1 of 2THIS TEST REPORT RELATES ONLY TO THE ITEMS TESTED AND SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED EXCEPT IN FULL WITHOUT WRITTEN

APPROVAL OF THE LABORATORY. ALL TEST RESULTS MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ACCREDITING AUTHORITY, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. U: Analyte was analyzed and not detected at or above adjusted Method Detection Limit J: Analyte was positively identified, though the quantitation was below Reporting Limit. Brian Snyder, Chemist II Email bssnyder@aep.com Tel. 614-836-4224 Fax 614-836-4168 Audinet 210-4224

Mountaineer Plant, 122993 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002.**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes LemmerzInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for thequarterly period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, James A. Yost, Vice President,Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     /s/ James A. Yost           James A. Yost *Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer*December 11, 2006
# ITil f ,IGHIT.

2012 Board ofDirectors

David Knies

- Chairman Bruce Bromberg- Vice Chairman

Bruce Bromberg- Treasurer jonathan Steiner- Secretary Michael Coviello

- Director

Paul Gryglas

- Director Henrique Rodriguez

- Director Tom Powers- Chairman Emeritus

MISSION HOTLINE

(800) 276-0300

WEBSITE www.VitaiFlight.org Tuesday, July 24, 2012 DocketManagementFacility US Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. West Building Ground Floor Room Wl2-140 Washington, DC 20590**·~** !'.! ( .•.l·

Re: Petition for Exemption,§ 61.113(c) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (14 CFR) To Whom ItMay Concern: Ourorganization is a state and federally registered 501(c)3 not-for-profit charity. We coordinate free airtransportation for the needy. Many people refer to what we do as "flights ofmercy," "angel flights," or "compassion flights." I am writing today to formally petition your office for an exemption from § 61.113(c) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (14 CFR). We are requesting an effective date on or about December 1, 2012. We specifically request one with stipulations similarto those contained in exemption number 10513 (Regulatory DocketFAA-2011-1070.) The exemption, ifgranted, would allow us to reimburse our volunteer pilots for the cost of fuel when flying charitable flights. Fuel costs have been on a steady rise for nearly a decade. The pilots who volunteerto fly for us have been voicing their concerns about this cost eventually reaching a prohibitive level. Itis ourhope that an exemption would allow us to use money donated, specifically for mission fuel, to relieve that burden for participantpilots. Itis our beliefthat it would lead to more pilots flying more charitable flights. Since we coordinate missions for all those in need, as well as specific programs atthe VA Medical Center in West Palm Beach, the exemption would certainly benefitthe

### public, as well as the volunteer pilots. As I'm sure you are aware, similar exemptions have been granted under numbers I0009A, 1 0019A, and 10513. The flight standards that we currently require ofvolunteer pilots meet and/or exceed the standards set in the exemptions mentioned above. When reviewing the exemptions previously issued, safety is actually improved through more recurrenttraining, higher approach minimums, and educational courses. Accordingly, there is no safety downside. IfFederal Register publication is deemed necessary, we are requesting an exemption on behalf ofour member pilots from§ 61.113(c) ofTitle 14, Code ofFederal Regulations (14 CFR). The exemption, ifgranted, would allow us to reimburse volunteer pilots for the cost offuel when flying charitable flights. I can be contacted by mail at: PO Box 1767, Pompano Beach, FL 33061; by facsimile at: (205) 278-1490; by telephone at: (256) 658-7475; orby email at: david@vitaltlight.org.

P.O. Box 1767, Pompano Beach, Florida 33061 "OurPassion is Flying.... OurMission- Helping People"

# ~(L' David M Knies Chairman Vital Flight, Inc.
Cc: John S. Duncan, Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service, FAA

P.O. Box 1767, Pompano Beach, Florida 33061 "OurPassion is Flying.... OurMission- Helping People"