alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 56411.

protest 177861-K (A) (New York).

#### Dover Jewelry Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-0521V

UNPUBLISHED

ALISON MORA,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: June 22, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

David John Carney, Green & Schafle LLC, Philadelphia, PA, for Petitioner.

Sarah Black Rifkin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On January 11, 2021, Alison Mora fil ed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensati on Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she su ffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), result ing from an influenza (“flu”) vaccine administered to her on November 13, 2019. Petition at 1. Petiti oner further alleges that she suffered the

residual effects of her conditi on for more than six months. Pe tition at 4. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 21, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, Respondent states that “petitioner’s injury is consistent with SIRVA as

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned ex planation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims ' website in accordance with the E-Government Act

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information,

the disclosure of which would cons titute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Ac t will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).2 defined by the Vaccine Injury Table. Specif ically, petitioner had no history of pain, inflammation, or dysfunction of her left shoulder; pain occurred within 48 hours after receipt of an intramuscular vaccination; pain was limited to the shoulder in which the vaccine was administered; and no other condition or abnorma lity has been identified to explain petitioner’s shoulder pain”. Id. at 5. Respondent furthe r agrees that Petitioner
suffered the residual effects of her condition for more t han six months and that all prerequisites for compensation under the Act have been satisfied. Id.

In view of Respondent’s position a nd the evidence of record, I find that Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10(iii)(A)(2) 


Amendments to Executive Change of Control Agreement
WHEREAS, Frank Mergenthaler (the “Executive”) and The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (“Interpublic,” Interpublic and its subsidiaries being referred to herein as the “Company”) are parties to an Executive Change of Control Agreement dated as of May 27, 2010 and amended on August 29, 2013 (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, Section 5.1 of the Agreement states that the Agreement will expire as of September 1, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company wish to extend the Agreement for another three years;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of September 1, 2016, as follows:
		
	1.
	Incorporation by Reference.  All provisions of the Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by reference and shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent that such provisions are expressly modified by the provisions of this Amendment.  Words and phrases used in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement unless the context clearly indicates that a different meaning is intended.




		
	2.
	Extension.  Section 5.1(a)(i) of the Agreement is amended by replacing the phrase “September 1, 2016” with “September 1, 2019”.




*                       *                       *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Interpublic, by its duly authorized officer, and Executive have caused this Amendment to the Agreement to be executed.
 	
				
	 
	The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
	 
	Executive

	 
	 
	 
	 

	BY:
	/s/ Andrew Bonzani
	 
	/s/ Frank Mergenthaler

	 
	Andrew Bonzani
	 
	Frank Mergenthaler

	 
	SVP, General Counsel & Secretary
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	DATE:  October 26, 2016
	 
	DATE:  October 26, 2016
No. 52984.

#### Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 122840-K, etc. (New York).

*276Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of m-Wise, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gabriel Kabazo, Chief
      Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Gabriel KabazoGabriel
                Kabazo, Chief Financial Officer





Dated:
      May 15, 2008
PUBLIC LAW 108–73—AUG. 15, 2003 117 STAT. 891

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2465 (S. 1323):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

June 23, considered and passed House.

July 31, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–73

108th Congress

An Act

To extend for six months the period for which chapter 12 of title 11 of the United

States Code is reenacted.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Family Farmer Bankruptcy

Relief Act of 2003’’.

SEC. 2. SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR WHICH CHAPTER 12

OF TITLE 11, UNITED STATES CODE, IS REENACTED.

(a) AMENDMENTS.—Section 149 of title I of division C of Public

Law 105–277 (11 U.S.C. 1201 note) is amended—

(1) by striking ‘‘July 1, 2003’’ each place it appears and

inserting ‘‘January 1, 2004’’; and

(2) in subsection (a)—

(A) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2002’’ and inserting

‘‘June 30, 2003’’; and

(B) by striking ‘‘January 1, 2003’’ and inserting ‘‘July

1, 2003’’.

(b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by subsection

(a) take effect on July 1, 2003.

Approved August 15, 2003.

11 USC 1201

note.

11 USC

1201–1208,

1221–1231.

11 USC 101 note.

Family Farmer

Bankruptcy

Relief Act of

2003.

Aug. 15, 2003

[H.R. 2465]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 48217]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19083]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8413]

Shipping Coordinating Committee; Notice of Committee Meeting

    The Shipping Coordinating Committee (SHC) will conduct an open 
meeting at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday, August 27, 2013, in Room 1303 of the 
United States Coast Guard Headquarters Building, 2100 Second Street 
SW., Washington, DC 20593-0001. The primary purpose of the meeting is 
to prepare for the eighteenth Session of the International Maritime 
Organization's (IMO) Sub-Committee on Dangerous Goods, Solid Cargoes 
and Containers (DSC 18) to be held at the IMO Headquarters, United 
Kingdom, September 16-20, 2013.
    The agenda items to be considered include:

--Adoption of the agenda
--Decisions of other IMO bodies
--Review of general cargo ship safety
--Development of amendments to CSC 1972 and associated circulars
--Development of measures to prevent loss of containers
--Development of amendments to the IMSBC Code and supplements, 
including evaluation of properties of solid bulk cargoes
--Development of amendments to the IMDG Code and supplements, including 
harmonization with the United Nations Recommendations on the transport 
of dangerous goods
--Revision of the guidelines for packing of cargo transport units
--Development of amendments to SOLAS and the relevant codes concerning 
mandatory carriage of appropriate atmosphere testing instruments on 
board ships
--Casualty and incident reports and analysis
--Biennial agenda and provisional agenda for DSC 19
--Any other business
--Report ot the Maritime Safety Committee

    Members of the public may attend this meeting up to the seating 
capacity of the room. To facilitate the building security process, and 
to request reasonable accommodation, those who plan to attend should 
contact the meeting coordinator, Ms. Amy Parker, by email at 
Amy.M.Parker@uscg.mil, by phone at (202) 372-1423, by fax at (202) 372-
1925, or in writing at Commandant (CG-ENG-5), U.S. Coast Guard, 2100 
2nd Street SW., Stop 7126, Washington, DC 20593-7126 not later than 
August 20, 2013, 7 days prior to the meeting. Requests made after 
August 20, 2013 might not be able to be accommodated. Please note that 
due to security considerations, two valid, government issued photo 
identifications must be presented to gain entrance to the Headquarters 
building. The Headquarters building is accessible by taxi and privately 
owned conveyance (public transportation is not generally available). 
However, parking in the vicinity of the building is extremely limited. 
Additional information regarding this and other IMO SHC public meetings 
may be found at: www.uscg.mil/imo.

    Dated: July 31, 2013.
Marc Zlomek,
Executive Secretary, Shipping Coordinating Committee, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2013-19083 Filed 8-6-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-09-P
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Keane, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian T. Keane, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Keane, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: March 15, 2006 |  | /s/BRIAN T. KEANEBrian T. Keane
President and Chief Executive Officer
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

ROSA RIVERA KIM
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 806

[ March 23, 2016 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Bernard I. Bober , Judge; L.T. Case No. 13

- 2343 CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Rosa Rivera Kim appeals her convictions and sente nces following an open no contest plea. Her assistant public defender filed a motion to

withdraw as appellate counsel and a supporting brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We affirm Kim’s convictions and

sentences , but we remand t he case to the trial court with directions to enter a corrected written probation order, reflecting that Kim entered a plea of nolo contendere, rather than reflecting that she was found guilty by jury verdict.

Affirmed; Remanded with Instructions.

S TEVENSON

, L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Before the First Division,

July 31, 1944

No. 49648.

#### Petition 6306-R of G. R. Kirk Co. (Union Brokerage Co.) (Pembina).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

From the testimony of the sole witness who was the manager of the Christmas tree department of the petitioner, and responsible for the values stated in entry, it was found that the petitioner met the burden imposed, and that relief should be allowed. The good faith of petitioner was virtually conceded by the Government. On the record the petition was granted.
Exhibit 23.1.b









             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference  in  the
Registration  Statements on Form S-3 (File No. 33-51799)  and
Form  S-8 (File Nos. 33-45618 and 333-32636) of Great  Plains
Energy  Incorporated  of our report dated  February  5,  2002
relating  to  the  financial statements Great  Plains  Energy
Incorporated and Subsidiaries, which appears in this Form 10-
K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Kansas City, Missouri
February 26, 2002
No. 52012.

#### J. H. Thorp & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 34349-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

October 25, 2007

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-12273

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 03-02783-CV-PT-M

STEVEN ALLAN FIKE, 

individually, 

ANDREA RAIFORD DOXTATOR, 

individually and as mother and 

next friend of April Gowen, a minor, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

ARLENE RICHARDSON, 

Administrator of the estate of 

Billie Nadine Bigham, 

Plaintiff, 

WILLIAM JERRY WESTBROOK, 

Executor of the estate of Nadine Bigham, 

Intervenor-PlaintiffAppellant, 

versus 
2

JOHN EARL PEACE, an individual, 

D.G. TRUCKING COMPANY, 

GENERAL SHALE CORPORATION, 

a corporation, 

a.k.a. General Shale Building Materials, GP, 

a partnership composed of General Shale Building 

Materials, Inc. and Wientzberger Bawotoff 

Industries AG, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

_________________________

(October 25, 2007)

Before BARKETT, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

We find no reversible error in the district court’s grant of Summary

Judgment in favor of General Shale Products, LLC.

AFFIRMED.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 41738

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff-Respondent

,

v.

DANIELLE R. CLAUSEN

,

Defendant-Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2014 Unpublished Opinion No. 786

Filed: October 30, 2014

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, Canyon County. Hon. Molly J. Huskey , District Judge.

Order relinquishing jurisdiction, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public De fender; Brian R. Dickson, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GRATTON, Judge; and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Danielle R. Clausen pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance . I.C. § 37

-
2732(c)(1) . The district court sentenced Clausen to a unified term of seven years, with a

minimum period of confinement of three years . The district court suspended the sentence and

placed Claus en on probation. Thereafter, Clausen admitted to violating the terms of her

probation. The district court revoked the probation, ordered execution of the original sentence,

but retained jurisdiction. Ultimately the district court relinquished jurisdicti on. Clausen filed an

I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of her sentence, which the district court denied. Clausen appeals,

claiming that the district court erred by refusing to gr ant probation.

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district2 court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abu se of that discretion. State v. Hood , 102

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee , 117 Idaho 203, 205

- 06, 786 P.2d 594, 596

-
97 (Ct. App. 1990).

The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the information

before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Clausen has failed to

show that the district court abused its discretion. Accordingly, the order of the district court

relinquishing jurisdiction and Clausen’s sentence are affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JARON BRIGNAC,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0914 LKK CMK P

vs.

J.S. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 20, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00914-LKK -CMK Document 35 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 20, 2005 are adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s May 12, 2005 request to dismiss this action is granted; and

3. Plaintiff’s action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: July 11, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/brig0914.801

Case 2:04-cv-00914-LKK -CMK Document 35 Filed 07/12/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARKLAND GASSOWAY,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1851 WBS DAD P

vs.

SUPERIOR COURT OF

CALIFORNIA, SAN JOAQUIN

COUNTY, et al.,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has filed a document titled “Motion for Procedural Order under Rule

26(b) to Reorder Civil Rights Statute 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Be Order Under

Civil Case # SF086978A.” This incomprehensible filing does not include the case number of

any case filed in this court. The court’s records reflect that petitioner has filed five cases, three

habeas proceedings and two civil rights actions, all of which were closed at least a year ago. IT

IS ORDERED that petitioner’s April 13, 2006 motion is denied. Subsequent documents filed in

this closed case will be disregarded, and no orders will issue in response to future filings.

DATED: April 19, 2006.

DAD:13:mp

gass1851.158

Case 2:04-cv-01851-WBS-DAD Document 10 Filed 04/19/06 Page 1 of 1
Arrangement Letter with John G. Drosdick, dated July 15, 2008


 Exhibit 10.1 
 July 15, 2008 
 Mr. John G. Drosdick 
 Sunoco, Inc. 
 1735 Market Street 
 Suite LL 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 
 Dear Jack: 
 At the request of Sunoco, Inc.’s Board of Directors, you agree to serve as non-executive Chairman of the Board from August 8, 2008 until December 31,
2008. The purpose of this letter is to set forth our agreement as to the compensation that Sunoco, Inc. will pay to you for your service as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Sunoco, Inc. 
 You will continue as a member of our Board of Directors and will serve as the non-executive Chairman of the Board from August 8, 2008 until December 31, 2008.
You have tendered your resignation from the positions of non-executive Chairman of the Board and a director, effective as of December 31, 2008, and such resignation will be automatically effective on such date. During the time you serve as
non-executive Chairman and a director, we will pay you $50,000 per month (pro rated for August 2008) for such service. This compensation is in lieu of the cash- and stock-based compensation we pay to other non-employee directors. 
 In addition, during the period from August 8, 2008 until December 31, 2008, we will provide you with an office and secretarial support. That office will be
located in the Mellon Bank Center. Beginning on January 1, 2009, and continuing for three years until December 31, 2011, Sunoco will provide you with suitable office space, furnishings, supplies and secretarial assistance. Sunoco, or one
of its affiliates, will be the employer of the secretary and will be the lessor under the office lease. We will work with you with respect to selection of the office space. Our obligations under this paragraph will not exceed $75,000 per year. Any
income from this arrangement will be imputed to you. You will not be grossed up for any taxes on such imputed income. 






 July 15, 2008 
 Page 2

 This letter does not impact any benefits or payments you are entitled to receive upon your retirement as an employee of Sunoco, Inc. 
 Jack, let me add my thanks and gratitude for your loyal and dedicated service to Sunoco, Inc. over the past twelve years. I look forward to continuing to serve with you
on the Board of Directors for the remainder of this year. 
 Please review this letter and, if it is acceptable, please sign and return a counterpart
signature page to us. This letter will be effective if signed in counterparts, and delivery of a signature page is effective to bind the parties to this letter. The effective date of this letter is the date hereof. 
 Sincerely, 
 /s/ G. J. Ratcliffe 
  
 G. Jackson Ratcliffe 
 Chair, Sunoco, Inc. Governance Committee of the Board of Directors 
 I
confirm that the contents of this letter reflect our agreement 
 /s/ John G. Drosdick 
  
 Signature