alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4514 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4514

 To clarify that amounts from declinations should be deposited in the 
Crime Victims Fund and to temporarily provide additional deposits into 
                        the Crime Victims Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 11, 2024

  Mr. Durbin (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify that amounts from declinations should be deposited in the 
Crime Victims Fund and to temporarily provide additional deposits into 
                        the Crime Victims Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Crime Victims Fund Stabilization Act 
of 2024''.

SEC. 2. DEPOSITS IN CRIME VICTIMS FUND.

    Section 1402(b)(6) of the Victims of Crime Act of 1984 (34 U.S.C. 
20101(b)(6)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) a declination of a criminal prosecution or 
                other similar final disposition not involving a 
                conviction; or
                    ``(D) during the period beginning on the date of 
                enactment of this subparagraph and ending on September 
                30, 2029, sections 3729 through 3731 of title 31, 
                United States Code (commonly known as the `False Claims 
                Act'), except that--
                            ``(i) amounts necessary to remunerate qui 
                        tam plaintiffs as described in subsection (d) 
                        of section 3730 of title 31, United States 
                        Code, are not available for deposit to the 
                        Fund; and
                            ``(ii) amounts necessary to reimburse the 
                        United States Government for the damages which 
                        the Government sustains from an act described 
                        in subsection (a) of section 3729 of title 31, 
                        United States Code, are not available for 
                        deposit to the Fund.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Gary Eshleman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Jafra WorldwideHoldings (Lux) S.àr.l.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls over financial reporting.
Date August 13, 2004       /s/ GARY ESHLEMAN      Gary Eshleman   Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial Officer)  
65
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) Region IV Regulatory Fairness Board and the SBA Office of the National Ombudsman will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, January 17, 2007, at 10 a.m. The meeting will take place at BellSouth Building, Economic Development Theatre, (Mezzanine Level), 333 Commerce Street, Nashville, TN 37201. The purpose of the meeting is to receive comments and testimony from small business owners, small government entities, and small non-profit organizations concerning regulatory enforcement and compliance actions taken by Federal agencies. 

                    Anyone wishing to attend or to make a presentation must contact Jose Mendez, in writing or by fax, in order to be placed on the agenda. Jose Mendez, Agency Event Coordinator, SBA, 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, phone (202) 205-6178 and fax (202) 401-2707, e-mail:                     *Jose.mendez@sba.gov.*

                    For more information, see our Web site at                     *http://www.sba.gov/​ombudsman.*

Matthew Teague, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-401 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of FLATBUSH FEDERAL BANCORP, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Jesus R. Adia, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and John S. Lotardo, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





/s/ Jesus R. AdiaJesus R. AdiaPresident andChief Executive Officer/s/ John S. LotardoJohn S. LotardoExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer





Date: May 17, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4163 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4163

   To require a report on the United States supply of nitrocellulose.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2024

    Mr. Risch (for himself, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. 
Kennedy, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Daines, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Hagerty, Mrs. Fischer, 
   Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Scott of Florida, and Mr. Rounds) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require a report on the United States supply of nitrocellulose.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ammunition Supply Chain Act''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON UNITED STATES SUPPLY OF NITROCELLULOSE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Congress remains concerned about the domestic supply 
        and production of nitrocellulose.
            (2) Any failure or supply shortage could restrict 
        ammunition manufacturing for large and small calibers, harming 
        the commercial marketplace and placing the war fighters at 
        risk.
    (b) Report.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of 
        the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Army shall 
        submit to Congress a report on the United States supply chain 
        for smokeless gunpowder, including nitrocellulose, 
        nitroglycerin, and acid production, essential to ammunition 
        manufacturing.
            (2) Scope.--The report required under paragraph (1) should 
        address the following topics:
                    (A) Improving the sourcing of smokeless gunpowder 
                necessary for the production of ammunition, including 
                nitrocellulose, nitroglycerin, and acid production.
                    (B) Protecting against single points of failure 
                across ammunition supply chain facilities, including 
                primary and secondary locations.
                    (C) Reducing the risk of disruptions caused by 
                global demand for ammunition and ammunition smokeless 
                powder across commercial and non-commercial markets.
                    (D) Utilizing the private and commercial sector's 
                sourcing, manufacturing, and production capacity and 
                expertise to the greatest extent practicable to broaden 
                points of production and private sector investment.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DALJIT S. JANDU,

Plaintiff,

v.

U.S.A., and MIDDLE TENNESSEE

STATE UNIVERSITY,

Defendants.

CIV. S-04-1889-DFL PAN PS

ORDER

-o0oOn May 19, 2005, I directed the Clerk of Court to return

to plaintiff the filing fee in this action and close the file 

due to plaintiff’s failure to file a proper complaint despite

ample opportunity afforded by this court. 

On June 2, 2005, plaintiff filed a one-line letter

addressed to the Clerk of Court stating, “the undersigned

plaintiff shall appreciate settlement in the court.” On October

21, 2005, plaintiff filed a one-sentence “Motion to Reopen and

Case 2:04-cv-01889-DFL-PAN Document 12 Filed 11/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Reconsider Discovery Matter” wherein plaintiff “petitions” for

U.S. Citizenship and damages from Middle Tennessee State

University; attached is a notice to plaintiff to appear October

18, 2005, at the District Adjudications Office of U.S.

Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Plaintiff’s filings subsequent to the closure of this

case are in violation of this court’s order and abuse the court

process. Any further attempts by plaintiff to file a document in

this case shall result in the imposition of monetary sanctions. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b)(1) and (c).

So ordered. 

Dated: November 9, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01889-DFL-PAN Document 12 Filed 11/10/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHRISTOPHER LEE JENKINS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1152 MCE GGH P

vs.

J.G. ARCEO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an amended complaint pursuant

to the court's order of December 12. 2005. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. Plaintiff's January 9, 2006 application for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff must file a second amended complaint on or before February 15,

2006.

DATED: 1/23/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

jenk1152.36

Case 2:04-cv-01152-MCE -GGH Document 31 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 1
Conversation with T. Busby, August 2009
.

Wildwood Consulting To reduce nutrient runoff and satisfy its waste load allocation (WL A) under the Lower St. Johns River total maximum daily load (TMDL), Anheuser Bush used h yacinth management, a baffle sy stem, an d aeration in certain zones of its Lem Turner location. At its Main Street location, it reduced it’s nutrient load by altering its nutrient management plan, and increasing the acreage of its land application of wastewater. Georgia Pacific similarly reduced the quantity

of nutrients added to its treatment ponds.
Exhibit 32.2

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Magellan Midstream Holdings, L.P. (the
Partnership) for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John D. Chandler, Chief Financial Officer of Magellan Midstream Holdings
GP, LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/ John D. Chandler                     
|                                         
|John D. Chandler, Chief Financial Officer
|Date: November 6, 2007                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership
and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

UNIFI, INC. 
 Director
Compensation Policy* 
 (Effective as of October 26, 2016) 

Each director, who is considered “independent” within the meaning of the Director Independence Standards adopted by the Board of Directors, which
are inclusive of Section 303A.02 of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual, will receive the following compensation for service on the Board of Directors: 
  

	 	•	 	$45,000 annual retainer for the Chairman, payable (at the director’s election) in cash or restricted stock units; 

  

	 	•	 	$15,000 annual retainer for the chair of the Audit Committee, payable (at the director’s election) in cash or restricted stock units; 


 

	 	•	 	$10,000 annual retainer for the chairs of the Compensation Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, payable (at the director’s election) in cash or restricted stock units;


  

	 	•	 	an annual equity grant of $125,000 in the form of restricted stock units on the day of election to the Board at the annual shareholders’ meeting, which units vest in full upon grant; and 


 

	 	•	 	reimbursement of reasonable expenses incurred for attending Board and committee meetings. 

 Any
independent director who is initially appointed or elected to the Board of Directors other than at the annual meeting of shareholders will receive an equity grant in the form of restricted stock units one day following such appointment or election,
where the amount of units to be granted would be calculated on a pro rata basis based upon the period between the date of such appointment or election and the anticipated date of the next annual meeting of shareholders. 

Directors who are not determined to be “independent” as defined above will receive no compensation for serving as directors. 

 

	*	Adopted by the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board of Directors on October 26, 2016.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of EnerNOC, Inc.(the “Company”), for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, Neal C. Isaacson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, doeshereby certify, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:November 5, 2007

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Neal C. Isaacson |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Neal C. Isaacson          |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer   |

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to EnerNOC, Inc. and will be retained byEnerNOC, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
# C_2007175EN.01005701.xml

| 27.7.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/57

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending the Directive 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission’

COM(2007) 93 final — 2007/0036 (COD)

(2007/C 175/15)

On 19 April 2007 the Council of the European Union decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 175, paragraph 1 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

Since the Committee has already set out its views on the contents of the proposal in question in its opinion, adopted on 28 April 2004 (1), it decided, at its 436th plenary session of 30 and 31 May 2007 (meeting of 30 May), by 159 votes with 11 abstentions, not to draw up a new opinion on the subject, but to refer to the position it had taken in the above-mentioned document.

1

Brussels, 30 May 2007.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Dimitris DIMITRIADIS

---

(1)  2003/0282 COD, OJ C 117 of 30.4.2004.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

s0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

146865

DIANE WIEGMANN, Individually and as 

Successor Trustee of the ROBERT E. 

McGOWAN DECLARATION OF TRUST, 

ROBERT E. McGOWAN, JR., and 

DONNA GILLUND,

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants- Appellants,

v SC: 146865

COA: 306137

Berrien CC: 2010-000085-CH

SAMUEL THOMAS and RHONDA THOMAS,

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs- Appellees,

and

EDMUND J. FREZA, CAROL A. FREZA, and

CHEMICAL BANK,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 12, 2013 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Case 2:04-cv-01644-GEB-DAD   Document 25    Filed 05/25/06   Page 1 of 5

Case 2:04-cv-01644-GEB-DAD   Document 25    Filed 05/25/06   Page 2 of 5

Case 2:04-cv-01644-GEB-DAD   Document 25    Filed 05/25/06   Page 3 of 5

Case 2:04-cv-01644-GEB-DAD   Document 25    Filed 05/25/06   Page 4 of 5

Case 2:04-cv-01644-GEB-DAD   Document 25    Filed 05/25/06   Page 5 of 5

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-27T09:52:56-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO