alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order - Barbarin v. Scribner, CIV S 04–894 FCD KJM P

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY BARBARIN,

Petitioner,

v.

A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV S 04-0894 FCD KJM P

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and respondent’s counsel having shown extraordinary

circumstances supporting his request for additional time, it is hereby ordered that respondent may

have until November 28, 2005, to respond to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. No further

extensions will be granted. If respondent’s response to the habeas petition is an answer,

petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer. 

If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner’s opposition or statement of nonopposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the motion,

and respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fifteen days thereafter.

DATED: November 15, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00894-MDS Document 26 Filed 11/16/05 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Sherwood Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ending April 30, 2004, the undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: June 11, 2004

 
|   |                                   | /s/ Christopher J.  Willi |   |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Christopher J. Willi                   |                      |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and Secretary |                      |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STRUCTURES UNLIMITED, INC.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1140 PAN (JFM)

vs.

FIRST NATIONAL SURETY 

COMPANY OF AMERICA, and 

DOES 1 through 10, inclusive

Defendants ORDER SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE

 /

Pursuant to the consent of the parties, this action has been reassigned to the

assigned magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Discovery is closed and dispositive motions

have been resolved; this matter needs to be scheduled for trial. Pursuant to the provisions of

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule 16-240, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. A Final Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for Thursday, August 24,

2006, at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom # 25 before the undersigned.

2. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel.

3. The parties shall submit to the court and serve by mail on all other parties, no

later than seven days before the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, a status report

addressing the following matters:

Case 2:04-cv-01140-EFB Document 46 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 a. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cutoff dates for the

scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

 b. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the

relative simplicity or complexity of the action or proceedings;

 c. Whether the case is related to any other case, including matters in

bankruptcy;

 d. Whether the counsel will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this

matter acting as settlement judge and waiving any disqualifications by virtue of his so acting, or

whether they prefer to have a Settlement Conference before another judge;

 e. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this

matter.

4. Plaintiff and counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers

immediately of any settlement or other disposition (see Local Rule 16-160). 

DATED: July 17, 2006.

/001; structures.sco

Case 2:04-cv-01140-EFB Document 46 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 56424.

protests 177127-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Bemporad Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested not found were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 47859.

#### Protests 686023-G, etc., of Philip Lien et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain of the hats in question, valued at less than $3 per dozen, are similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), the claim at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) was sustained.
# C_2006303EN.01001701.xml

| 13.12.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/17

---

Opinion of the 397th advisory committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 17 October 2005 concerning a preliminary draft decision relating to Case COMP/38.281/B.2 — Raw Tobacco Italy

(2006/C 303/13)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the imposition of fines of EUR 1 000 on APTI and UNITAB. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the imposition of fines of EUR 1 000 on APTI and UNITAB.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the other fines. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the other fines.

| 3. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the basic amounts due to attenuating circumstances. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the reduction of the basic amounts due to attenuating circumstances.

| 4. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the amounts of reduction of the fines based on the Commission notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the amounts of reduction of the fines based on the Commission notice on immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases.

| 5. | The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines. |
| --- | --- |

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

| 6. | The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion. |
| --- | --- |

6.

The Advisory Committee asks the Commission to take into account all the other points raised during the discussion.

| 7. | The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          76,446                  98,608
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  247,243                  90,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,012,800                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,697,824                 763,142
<PP&E>                                         551,864                 401,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,147                  99,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,194,381               6,391,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,288,470                 373,377
<BONDS>                                      1,136,805                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         8,959                   6,631
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,185,422               5,938,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,194,381               5,945,063
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,498,793                 959,932
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,863,079               1,123,889
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,340                  13,647
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (376,994)               (177,604)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (376,994)               (177,604)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (376,994)               (177,604)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.046)                  (.028)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.046)                  (.028)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

163612.1 -1- 

WILKE,FLEURY,HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAC RAMENTO [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION TO WITHDRAW (No. CIV.S-04-0482 LKK DAD) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

OPHTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS, a 

California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MARK FUKUHARA, an individual, 

DOUGLAS BURLAND, an individual, 

MICHAEL GERKOVICH, an individual, 

STEVEN LEACH, an individual, 

EDMUND PETERSON, an individual, 

DAN SALOMON, an individual, JOE 

SILVA, an individual, DALE 

BRODSKY, an individual, 

EYEPICTURES, INC., a Missouri 

Corporation, JUSTICE OPHTHALMICS, 

INC., a Tennessee Corporation, ZETA 

DEVELOPMENT LABS, INC., a 

Tennessee Corporation, JOHNNY 

JUSTICE, JR., an individual, DOES ONE 

through TEN, 

Defendants. 

No. CIV.S-04-0482 LKK DAD 

ORDER RE 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

On August 29, 2005, this matter came before the Court on the motion of counsel Daniel P. 

Maguire (“Maguire”) and Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney, LLP (“Wilke Fleury”) to 

withdraw as counsel for Defendants Joe Silva (“Silva”) and Douglas Burland (“Burland”). 

Anthony J. DeCristoforo appeared on behalf of Maguire and Wilke Fleury. No other appearances 

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 153 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

163612.1 -2- 

WILKE,FLEURY,HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW

SAC RAMENTO [PROPOSED] ORDER RE MOTION TO WITHDRAW (No. CIV.S-04-0482 LKK DAD)

were made. 

Based on the papers and pleadings filed herein, and after oral argument, the Court hereby 

orders as follows: 

1. The motion of Maguire and Wilke Fleury to withdraw as counsel for Silva and 

Burland is GRANTED. 

2. If they have not already done so, Maguire and Wilke Fleury shall transmit their 

files to Silva and Burland (or, if applicable, new counsel for Silva and Burland) within fourteen 

(14) days of the date of this Order. 

3. A status conference is set for October 24, 2005 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 4. Silva 

and Burland are ordered to appear at the status conference, unless they have retained new counsel 

by that date, in which case their new counsel shall appear. 

4. The Court hereby modifies its Order of April 6, 2004, in which Wilke Fleury was 

ordered to preserve backup tapes that were made by Plaintiff of Defendants’ computer hard drives 

and other electronic storage media. Wilke Fleury is relieved of its obligation to maintain the 

backup tapes and is ordered to transfer the tapes to counsel for Defendant Zeta Development 

Labs, Inc. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: September 1, 2005 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton

 Lawrence K. Karlton 

 Senior Judge 

 

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 153 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 2
July 30, 2013

Mr. Michael Rentz

Analar Corporation

41 Airpark Road

Princeton, NJ 08540

Dear Mr. Rentz:

This is in response to your June 7, 2013 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA-2013-0510) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration on behalf of Analar Corporation (Analar) for 

an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That 

exemption, if granted, would allow Analar to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one 

testing program.

On July 15, 2013, the FAA published the Combined Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs 

final rule (78 FR 41999) relating to air carrier operators and commuter or on-demand 

operators that also conduct commercial air tour operations to combine the drug and alcohol 

testing required for each operation into one testing program. A copy of this rule change is 

enclosed for your information.

If you have any questions, please contact the FAAs Drug Abatement Division at (202) 267-

8442 or drugabatement@faa.gov. Because the relief you seek is now covered under the new 

rule, we will take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Ida M. Klepper

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Exhibit 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Bernard Berk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition
        of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result
    of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

|      |  |                   |  |                             | 
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | --------------------------- | 
|Date: |  | February 14, 2008 |  | /s/
    Bernard Berk        | 
|      |  |                   |  | Bernard Berk                | 
|      |  |                   |  | Chief Executive Officer of  | 
|      |  |                   |  | Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Bruk, CEO, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of Xten Networks, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xten Networks, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: December 3, 2004

/s/ Mark Bruk					Mark Bruk
CEO, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 27 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 12 of 12
##### 



Exhibit 10.15
 AMENDMENT, FREEZE AND TERMINATION AGREEMENT TO THE
XANSER CORPORATION
1996 SUPPLEMENTAL DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 THIS AMENDMENT, FREEZE AND TERMINATION AGREEMENT Sponsor
 W I T N E S S E T H:
 WHEREAS Plan
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS Valero Termination Date
 NOW, THEREFORE
  Eligibility, Benefit Accruals, Vesting And Computation And Payment Of
Benefits Incident To Freezing And Termination Of The Plan.
 Eligibility.
 - 1 -




---



##### 



Final Valuation Date Valero Merger Agreement
 Benefit Accrual.
 Vesting
 Computation of Benefits Payable Under the Plan as of the Final Valuation
Date.
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Payment of Benefits Payable Under the Plan on the Final Valuation Date.
  - 3 -




---



##### 



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF
 XANSER CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ William H. KettlerTitle:


    Vice
President
March 6, 1946

No. 50937.

Abstract 50726.

#### Protest 58462-K of S. S. Schultz & Co., Inc.

Motion of Government for rehearing granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE SPITTAL,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-1198-GEB-DAD-PS

vs.

JAY SCHENIRER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed

findings and recommendations herein which were served on all

parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed

within ten days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings

and recommendations.

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 45 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 8,

2005, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. no. 29) is

granted;

3. Plaintiff’s motion re contempt (Doc. no. 36) is

denied;

4. Plaintiff’s amended complaint is dismissed with

prejudice; and

5. The Clerk is directed to close this case.

DATED: December 6, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 45 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 64861.

#### Frederik Lunning, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/8259 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vases in mineral colors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62694, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.