alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
Medical Malpractice: Maine's Use of Practice Guidelines to Reduce Costs
(Letter Report, 10/25/93, GAO/HRD-94-8).

As part of a larger goal of reducing health care costs and improving
medical care, Maine is testing an innovative medical malpractice reform
initiative.  Maine has incorporated into state law 20 practice
guidelines for four specialties: anesthesiology, emergency medicine,
obstetrics and gynecology, and radiology.  This effort seeks to resolve
malpractice claims by eliminating the need to litigate to establish the
standard of care.  Maine officials expect that the practice guidelines
will decrease doctors' motivation to do medically unnecessary tests and
will lower health care costs.  Maine was able to incorporate the
practice guidelines into law by (1) gaining broad involvement of those
affected by the guidelines, (2) ensuring that those developing and
choosing the guidelines were accountable to the public, and (3)
protecting the physicians who use the guidelines in their practice.
Specifically, the project was developed and is overseen by health care
providers, payers, and consumers.  To persuade Maine's doctors to
participate in the project once it was developed, the project provides
physicians complying with the guidelines a defense in future malpractice
lawsuits.  With these components, the majority of eligible doctors opted
to participate in the project.

--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------

 REPORTNUM:  HRD-94-8
     TITLE:  Medical Malpractice: Maine's Use of Practice Guidelines to 
             Reduce Costs
      DATE:  10/25/93
   SUBJECT:  Malpractice (medical)
             Health care cost control
             Health care services
             Physicians
             State-administered programs
             Health care programs
             Liability (legal)
             Program evaluation
             Quality assurance
             Risk management
IDENTIFIER:  Maine
             Maine Medical Liability Demonstration Project
             National Health Care Reform Initiative
             Clinton Health Care Plan
             Health Security Act
             
************************************************************************

We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.

See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or 
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]
```
# C_2006288EN.01002601.xml

| 25.11.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/26

---

Annual Report 2005

(2006/C 288/18)

The European Ombudsman has presented his Annual Report for the year 2005 to the European Parliament, in accordance with Article 195 (1) of the Treaty establishing the European Community and Article 3 (8) of the Decision of the European Parliament on the Regulations and General Conditions Governing the performance of the Ombudsman's Duties.

The Annual Report as well as a shorter version containing only the Executive Summary and the Statistics are available on the European Ombudsman's website in all 20 official languages at:

http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu

Paper copies of these publications can be requested free of charge from the European Ombudsman's office:

| 1, Avenue du Président Robert Schuman |
| --- |
| B.P. 403 |
| F-67001 Strasbourg Cedex |
| Tel. (33-3) 88 17 23 13 |
| Fax (33-3) 88 17 90 62 |
| E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu |

1, Avenue du Président Robert Schuman

B.P. 403

F-67001 Strasbourg Cedex

Tel. (33-3) 88 17 23 13

Fax (33-3) 88 17 90 62

E-mail: eo@ombudsman.europa.eu

---
# C_2006251EN.01002001.xml

| 17.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/20

---

Member States notifications in accordance with Article 5 of Decision 895/2006 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 introducing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia of certain documents as equivalent to their national visas for the purposes of transit through their territories

1

and

Article 4 of Decision 896/2006 (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 2006 establishing a simplified regime for the control of persons at the external borders based on the unilateral recognition by the Member States of certain residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein for the purpose of transit through their territory

2

(2006/C 251/06)

The following Member States that acceded in 2004 have notified that they will fully implement Decision 895/2006 and Decision 896/2006 from the date indicated in the following table:

| | Date of implementation |
| --- | --- |
| Decision 895/2006:
  Visas and residence permits issued by Schengen Member States and all Member States that acceded in 2004 | Decision 896/2006:
  Residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein |
| Cyprus | 10 July 2006 | 10 July 2006 |
| Czech Republic | 1 September 2006 | 1 September 2006 |
| Hungary | 1 September 2006 | 1 September 2006 |
| Latvia | 1 December 2006 | 1 December 2006 |
| Malta | 1 October 2006 | 1 October 2006 |
| Poland | 1 August 2006 | 1 August 2006 |
| Slovenia | 10 July 2006 | 10 July 2006 |
| Slovakia | 1 October 2006 | 1 October 2006 |

Date of implementation

Decision 895/2006:

Visas and residence permits issued by Schengen Member States and all Member States that acceded in 2004

Decision 896/2006:

Residence permits issued by Switzerland and Liechtenstein

Cyprus

10 July 2006

10 July 2006

Czech Republic

1 September 2006

1 September 2006

Hungary

1 September 2006

1 September 2006

Latvia

1 December 2006

1 December 2006

Malta

1 October 2006

1 October 2006

Poland

1 August 2006

1 August 2006

Slovenia

10 July 2006

10 July 2006

Slovakia

1 October 2006

1 October 2006

Estonia and Lithuania have notified that they will not implement both Decisions.

---

(1)  OJ L 167, 20.6.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 167, 20.6.2006, p. 8.

2

---
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4418 — Nycomed Group/Altana Pharma)

(2006/C 283/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned officer of Genesis HealthCare Corporation (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) that:


| | (1) | The Report
       fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                
| | (2) | The information
       contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
    financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                

|      |                |                        
|----- | -------------- | -----------------------
|Date: | August 9, 2005 | /s/ James V. McKeon    
|      |                |                        
|      |                | James V. McKeon        
|      |                | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.


---
No. 65507.

#### National Silver Company *v.*United States,

protests 285901-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore*& *Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Upgrade OTCnet Offline Check Capture Software

To upgrade OTCnet Offline Check Capture software, complete the following steps:

1. Close any open batches and upload all existing batches in Batch Management.

2. From the Windows Start Button menu, select Stop OTCnet Offline to stop the offline 

application as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Stop OTCnet Offline

3. After downloading the latest version of OTCnet Offline, locate the folder on the workstation 

where the OTCnet Offline zip file resides e.g., your Downloads folder. Double click the zip 

file. Double click the EXE file to start the installation. Welcome to OTCnet Offline QA Setup 

program dialog box appears. 

4. Select Next. The Destination Location dialog box appears as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Destination Location
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• To install the software to another folder destination, select Browse to select a 

different folder. 

• Select Back to go back.

• Select Cancel to exit the setup.

5. Select Next. The Start Installation dialog box appears.

6. Select Next. The CCA Offline User Credentials dialog box appears. 

7. Enter your User ID and Offline Password in the appropriate text boxes and select Next. 

Wait while the files install.

• If an incorrect User ID and/or Offline Password is entered, an Installation Error

dialog box message appears stating that the entered username (User ID) and/or 

password is invalid as shown in Figure 3.

• Select OK. The upgrade process is cancelled. 

• Run the installer again and enter the correct credentials.

Figure 3. Installation Error

8. After the OTCnet Offline has been successfully installed message appears, select Finish. 

You have the upgraded version of OTCnet Offline Check Capture Software.

• The Offline Installer verifies that Java is installed on the workstation.

• If Java is not installed, you will receive a “Java must be installed for the Offline to 

function. The JAVA_HOME environment variable must also be set pointing to the 

main Java installation folder” message. A Windows Administrator must install 

Java.

Application Tips

Application Tips

Application Tip
No. 47353.

#### Protests 78661-K, etc., of Rodier, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following Abstract 45938 the protests were sustained as to certain of the items, in accordance with stipulation of counsel
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4031 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
**ArcelorMittal**

 P erformance testing , average emission rate (lb SO 2 /hr) : o 2007

– 13.8 o 2008

– 25.7 o 2009

– 24.6 o 2011

– 23 .0  Facility suggested following limits: o 2.0 lbs SO 2 /MM Btu o This limit is not based on the performance of a wet scrubber (which is in op eration at the facility)  MPCA set BART at 0. 1 65 lb SO 2 /LT , measured on a 30 day rolling average; applies when burning natural gas  Converting MPCA limit gives : o 59.4 lb SO 2 /hr based on 360 LT/hr production rate (average production rate from 2011 test) o 38.9 lb SO 2 /hr based on 235 LT/hr production rate (average production rate from 2008 test

– test with highest emissions rate )  Set limit at 23.0 lb SO 2 /hr, measured on a 30 - day rolling average; does not apply when burning fuel oil
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24


                        [RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]



                         CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY


        We consent to the use on form 10-KSB of PrimeEnergy Corporation of our
reserve report and all schedules, exhibits, and attachments thereto incorporated
by reference of Form 10-KSB and to any reference made to us on Form 10-KSB as a
result of such incorporation.

                                         Very Truly Yours,

                                         /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                             PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

                                         RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                         PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



Denver, Colorado
March 15, 1997
(Reap. Dec. 10414)

#### Ideal Toy Corp. Wedemann & Godknecht, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1044695.

(Decided January 8, 1963)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiffs.

*Joseph D. Gmlfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Foed, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto that the merchandise consists of injection molds composed wholly or in chief value of steel exported from Portugal on or about June 3,1961, and that such merchandise is not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and is subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $5,105 for merchandise described as pitcher base mold No. 8665, pitcher cover No. 8665 and crisper top mold No. 8666 rather than the appraised value of $5,555.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal for reap-praisement may be submitted on this stipulation.

*354Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts, I find that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, and T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and I hold that such statutory value is $5,105 for merchandise described as pitcher base mold No. 8665, pitcher cover No. 8665, and crisper top mold No. 8666.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1Plaintiff was cautioned on June 24, 2005 that he was required to properly serve all

documents which he submitted to the court for consideration. (Doc. 42.) 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY JACKSON SEELEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1800 DFL CMK P

vs.

TERESA A. SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On July 14, 2005, plaintiff filed a letter. The letter was not served on defendants. 

Plaintiff is again advised1 that every document submitted to the court for consideration must be

served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served electronically are usually

served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. 

To comply with the service requirement, plaintiff must file his original document

along with a proof of service, stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to

defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c). Plaintiff

must file a copy of his document only if his original document exceeds twenty-five pages. 

Case 2:04-cv-01800-DFL-CMK Document 49 Filed 07/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s July 14, 2005 letter shall

be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to serve any

documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and failure to include a proper certificate of

service with such filing, may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

DATED: July 21, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01800-DFL-CMK Document 49 Filed 07/22/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerry Treppel, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:
February 12, 2010

/s/ Jerry TreppelJerry TreppelChief Executive Officerof Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Principal Executive Officer)




This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 45 (Thursday, March 8, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10531-10532]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4094]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Ocean Transportation Intermediary License Revocations

    The Federal Maritime Commission hereby gives notice that the 
following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been revoked 
pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 
409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing 
of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR Part 515, effective on 
the corresponding date shown below:

License Number: 018793F.
Name: Berr International, Inc.
Address: 8344 NW 30th Terrace, Miami, FL 33122.
Date Revoked: February 17, 2007.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

License Number: 003147NF.

[[Page 10532]]

Name: Eagle Shipping & Trading Corporation.
Address: 1380 Flatbush Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11210.
Date Revoked: February 17, 2007.
Reason: Failed to maintain valid bonds.

License Number: 002880NF.
Name: Four Stars Forwarding.
Address: Box 26046, San Diego, CA 92196.
Date Revoked: February 15, 2007.
Reason: Surrendered license voluntarily.

License Number: 003973F.
Name: Freight Service Network Inc.
Address: 831-A Foster Ave., Bensenville, IL 60106.
Date Revoked: February 18, 2007.
Reason: Failed to maintain a valid bond.

Sandra L. Kusumoto,
Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.
 [FR Doc. E7-4094 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Michael D. Stern, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A (Amendment No. 1) of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          |  | 
|----------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Michael D. Stern                     
|Michael D. Stern, Chief Executive Officer
|Date: October 27, 2006
<PAGE>

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

BY THE

PRESIDENT & CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Leo M. van Wijk, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of KLM Royal Dutch Airlines,
a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared; and

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
         covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
         reasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 31, 2004

LEO M. VAN WIJK
President & Chief Executive Officer

                                       63