alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10419)

#### Wheeler & Miller, a/c Shelford, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 32104, etc.

(Decided January 10, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule “A” for decision upon stipulation, reading as follows:

> *3591. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialed JTC (Examiner’s Initials) 'by Examiner John T. Clifford (Examiner’s Name) on the invoices covered by the above-entitled appeals.

> 2. That as so limited the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material ¡respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *Gitkin Co.,*A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 3. That as so limited, the prices at the time of exportation at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for exportation to the United States to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, such prices including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values less the proportionate part of the items on the invoices marked “B” in green ink by the Examiner; and that at the said time of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered or sold for home consumption in the country of exportation.

> 4. That the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption both before and after February 27,1958, and is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to. the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).

> 5. That the appeals enumerated in the attached Schedule “A” may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and the issues described herein above and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find that export value, as defined in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, or section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise to which the appeals have been limited, as described in paragraph 1 of the stipulation, and that such values in any case were the appraised value, less the proportionate part of the items on the invoices marked “B” in green ink by the examiner.

As to all items other than those described in paragraph 1 of the stipulation, the appeals for reappraisement having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Neal C. Isaacson,certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof EnerNOC, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Reserved;

c) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 10, 2007
|        | By:    | /s/ Neal C.  Isaacson                    |   |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Neal C. Isaacson                              |
|   |   | Chief Financial  Officer                      |
|   |   | (principal  financial and accounting officer) |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal Doran v. Staples, et. al.

 CIV. S-04-1613 DFL CMK

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY DORAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

STAPLES INC., ERRONEOUSLY SUED

AS ST A P L E S T HE OFFICE

SUPERSTORE dba STAPLES; PAULINA

DONA CHUNG TRUSTEE OF THE JOHN

CLAYTON CHUNG & PAULINE DONNA

CHUNG REVOCABLE TRUST,

Defendant.

 

Case No. CIV.S-04-1613 DFL CMK

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Case 2:04-cv-01613-DFL-CMK Document 15 Filed 04/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order of Dismissal Doran v. Staples, et. al.

- 2 - CIV. S-04-1613 DFL CMK

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S04-1613 DFL CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: 4/14/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

Chief United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01613-DFL-CMK Document 15 Filed 04/19/05 Page 2 of 2
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 23

- 11256

Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________

LENA MARIE LINDBERG,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus DEAN LACORTE,

owner, beachside storage and office park, TY BERDEAUX, court operations manager, MATTHEW PATTERSON, deputy clerk, SCOTT ELLIS, brevard county clerk of court, retired, ROBERT BLAISE TRETTIS, public defender, USCA11 Case: 23-11256 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2023 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 23

- 11256

et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees.

__________________ __ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 6:21

- cv

- 01747

- RBD

- DCI

____________________
Before W ILSON , B RANCH , and L UCK , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte , for lack of jurisdiction. The statutory time limit required Lena Lindberg to file a notice of appeal on or before May 31 , 2022, which was the next business day after 30 days following the date judgment was deemed

ente red on the district court’s November 29, 2021 dismissal order. 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4 (a)(1)(A), (7)(A), 26(a)(1)(C). However, Lindberg did not file a notice of appeal until April 8, 2023. Additionally , there is no basis in the record for relief under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(5) or 4(a)(6). Accordingly, the notice of appeal is untimely and cannot invoke our appellate jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin. , 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (1 1th Cir. 2010) (noting that t he timely filing of a notice of USCA11 Case: 23-11256 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2023 Page: 2 of 323

- 11256 Opinion of the Court 3
appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement, and we cannot entertain an appeal that is out of time )

.All pending motions are denied as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed u nless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40

- 3 and all other applicable rules. USCA11 Case: 23-11256 Document: 19-1 Date Filed: 06/08/2023 Page: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the use of our report dated February 9, 1998 in this Annual
Report (Form 10-K) of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedules of Jefferson-Pilot
Corporation listed in Item 14(a).  These schedules are the responsibility of
the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits.  In our opinion, the financial statement schedules referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as
a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
9, 1998 with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, and our report
included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial statement
schedules, in the following Registration Statements:

   Form S-8, Nos. 2-36778, 2-56410, and 33-30530, pertaining to the
     Long Term Stock Incentive Plan and predecessor stock plans, and
     outstanding effective registration statements on Form S-16
     included in such S-8 filings;
   Form S-8, No. 33-56369, pertaining to the JP Teamshare Plan;
   Form S-8, No. 33-64137, pertaining to the 1995 Non-Employee Directors'
     Stock Option Plan;
   Form S-3, No. 33-63521, pertaining to debt securities and warrants
     to purchase securities.


                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 20, 1998




EXHIBIT 23

                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our report included in this Form 10-K of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation for the
year ended December 31, 1997, into the Company's previously filed Registration
Statement File Nos. 2-36778, 2-56410, 33-30530, 33-56369, 33-64137, and 33-
63521.


                                               ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Detroit, Michigan
March 26, 1998



EXHUBIT 23

                           ACCOUNTANT'S CONSENT


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 6, 1996, which is included in this annual report on Form 10-K, on the
consolidated financial statements of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation and
subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1995 and the information included
in the financial statements insofar as it relates to 1995, into Jefferson-
Pilot Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement File Nos. 2-36778,
2-56410, 33-30530, 33-56369, 33-64137 and 33-63521.


                                               McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 27, 1998
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Report of ProtoKinetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr.
      John Todd, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the
      following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











/s/
      Dr. John Todd


Dr.
      John
      Todd


President
      and Chief Executive Officer





August
      9,
      2006
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4509 

To authorize the appropriation of amounts for the construction of a consolidated rigging facility for the special operations forces at Hunter Army 

Airfield, Georgia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2024 

Mr. OSSOFF introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To authorize the appropriation of amounts for the construction of a consolidated rigging facility for the special 

operations forces at Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hunter Army Airfield 

5 Support Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4509 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION OF AMOUNTS FOR CONSTRUCTION 

2 OF A CONSOLIDATED RIGGING FACILITY FOR 

3 THE SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES AT HUN4 TER ARMY AIRFIELD, GEORGIA. 

5 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Sec6 retary of Defense for fiscal year 2025 $47,000,000 for the 

7 construction of a consolidated rigging facility for the spe8 cial operations forces at Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Before the Second Division,

November 6, 1947

No. 52007.

#### Century Glove Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 626292-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiffs was therefore sustained.
Before the Third Division,

December 31, 1942

No. 47863.

#### Protest 91984-K of F. Frisch, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Charles E. Drimal Jr.
-------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
March 31, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         700,856
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,714,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                   634,606
<INVENTORY>                                 22,437,720
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            42,950,150
<PP&E>                                       5,227,108
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,447,445
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             102,541,152
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,719,399
<BONDS>                                     46,941,215
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,366
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,703,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               102,541,152
<SALES>                                     57,158,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            57,158,169
<CGS>                                       35,018,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               35,018,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,092,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,013,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,104,168
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,797,753
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,306,415
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,306,415
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17


</TABLE>
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/19

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
Order entered November 1 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 13
- 00958
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF I .L.S., A CHILD On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 09
- 7655 

### O R DER
We REINSTATE this appeal. On September 26, 2013, the Court ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing regarding appellant’s alleged errors and/or omissions from the reporter’s record. The trial court conducted a hearing and filed her findings and a reporter’s record from the hearing. The trial court found three errors in the record and a corrected reporter’s record has been filed with the Court. Before the Court are the following motions filed by appellant: (1) September 23, 2013 motion requesting copies of the origina l and supplemental records; and (2) October 17, 2013 motion requesting that the Clerk of this Court serve all papers issued by the Court on five persons designated by appellant.
We GRANT appellant’s motion requesting copies of the rec ords to the following extent:
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send appellant a paper copy of the following records:1. clerk’s record filed on August 1, 2013;
2. supplemental clerk’s record filed on August 27, 2013;
3. supplemental clerk’s record filed on Sept ember 9, 2013;
4. volumes one through five of the reporter’s record filed on July 19, 2013; and
5. volume one of the supplemental reporter’s record of the final trial held on April 9, 2013 that was filed with this Court on October 25, 2013. With regard to appell ant’s request for service of papers in this cause, we note that the Court is sending copies of correspondence to Annette Littleton, Scott Henson, and Shawn Williams. We DENY appellant’s motion with regard to D. Smith Sims & Associates, LLP and Monica Moor ehead. Appellant shall file his brief on or before DECEMBER 16, 2013

. /s/ DAVID LEWIS JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2004, of El Paso Production Holding Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, D. Mark Leland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



                                        /s/ D. Mark Leland
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        D. Mark Leland
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)

                                        December 15, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Production Holding Company and will be retained by El Paso
Production Holding Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
ttcm_ex102.htm

EXHIBIT 10.2
 
 
 
 
	 
	1

	

	 


 
 
	 
	2

	

	 


 
 
	 
	3

	

	 


 
 
 
	4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Rodney Baylis,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1143 DFL PAN P

vs.

Tom L. Carey, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 31, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

Case 2:04-cv-01143-DFL-PAN Document 7 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 31, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be

granted. 28 U.S.C. §1915A; 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

DATED: 6/30/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01143-DFL-PAN Document 7 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 2