alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4020 

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the export 

or sale of petroleum products from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve 

to certain entities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Mr. FETTERMAN (for himself, Ms. ERNST, Mr. CASEY, Mr. BROWN, and Mr. 

COTTON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy and Conservation Act to prohibit the export or sale of petroleum products from the 

Strategic Petroleum Reserve to certain entities, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Banning Oil Exports 

5 to Foreign Adversaries Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4020 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN EXPORTS. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Energy Policy and Conserva3 tion Act is amended by inserting after section 163 (42 

4 U.S.C. 6243) the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 164. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN EXPORTS. 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall prohibit the 

7 export or sale of petroleum products drawn down from the 

8 Strategic Petroleum Reserve, under any provision of law, 

9 to— 

10 ‘‘(1) the People’s Republic of China; 

11 ‘‘(2) the Democratic People’s Republic of 

12 Korea; 

13 ‘‘(3) the Russian Federation; 

14 ‘‘(4) the Islamic Republic of Iran; 

15 ‘‘(5) the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela; 

16 ‘‘(6) the Syrian Arab Republic; 

17 ‘‘(7) the Republic of Cuba; and 

18 ‘‘(8) any entity owned, controlled, or influenced 

19 by— 

20 ‘‘(A) a country referred to in any of para21 graphs (1) through (7); or 

22 ‘‘(B) the Chinese Communist Party. 

23 ‘‘(b) WAIVER.—The Secretary may issue a waiver of 

24 the prohibition described in subsection (a) if the Secretary 

25 certifies that any export or sale authorized pursuant to 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4020 IS

1 the waiver is in the national security interests of the 

2 United States. 

3 ‘‘(c) RULE.—Not later than 60 days after the date 

4 of enactment of the Banning Oil Exports to Foreign Ad5 versaries Act, the Secretary shall issue a rule to carry out 

6 this section.’’. 

7 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

8 (1) DRAWDOWN AND SALE OF PETROLEUM

9 PRODUCTS.—Section 161(a) of the Energy Policy 

10 and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6241(a)) is 

11 amended by inserting ‘‘and section 164’’ before the 

12 period at the end. 

13 (2) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of con14 tents for the Energy Policy and Conservation Act is 

15 amended by inserting after the item relating to sec16 tion 163 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 164. Prohibition on certain exports.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1Park City Group, Inc. & SubsidiariesCertification Pursuant To18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant ToSection 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Randall K. Fields, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |  | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of  operations of the Company.
| |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: October 13, 2006

/s/ Randall K. FieldsPrincipal Executive Officer, CEO

(REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ S. TREZEVANT MOORE, JR.S. Trezevant Moore, Jr.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 49153.

#### Petition 6310-R of F. & R. Lazarus & Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From the record the court was of the opinion that the entry at the entered prices.was made in good faith and the petitioner was without intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the goods. The petition was therefore granted.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

CHRISTOPHER DESMOND, 

Defendant Below, 

Appellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Appellee.

§ 

§ 

§ No. 23, 2023 

§ 

§ Court Below: Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 91009844DI 

§ 

§

Submitted: February 2, 2023 

Decided: February 20, 2023 

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices. 

 

ORDER

After consideration of the notice to show cause and the response, it appears to 

the Court that: 

(1) On January 23, 2023, the appellant, Christopher Desmond, filed a 

notice of appeal from a Superior Court order dated January 10, 2023, which denied 

Desmond’s “Motion for the Court to Amend the Unauthorized and Misinformation 

Enclosed in the Presentence Report.” Desmond also filed an incomplete and 

unsigned motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis. 

(2) Desmond has filed numerous writs and motions for postconviction and 

other relief over the years, including at least sixteen motions for postconviction 
2

relief.1 Because of Desmond’s repetitive filing of frivolous claims, in 2014 this 

Court directed the Clerk “to refuse any filing from Desmond unless the filing is 

accompanied by the required filing fee or a completed motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis, with a sworn affidavit containing the certifications under 10 Del. C. § 

8803(e), and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted by this Court.”2 

(3) Following the receipt of the current notice of appeal, the Senior Court 

Clerk issued a notice identifying the 2014 order regarding future filings and directing 

Desmond to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed because he had 

failed to pay the required filing fee or to file a completed motion to proceed in forma 

pauperis with the certifications that he is required to make under 10 Del. C. § 

8803(e). The notice also stated that “[t]o the extent that you submit a completed 

motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis in response to this notice to show 

cause, you must also demonstrate that the issues that you seek to raise have never 

been raised or disposed of before and are not foreclosed by controlling law.” 

(4) In response to the notice to show cause, Desmond has not paid the filing 

fee or provided a completed motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis with 

the required certifications. Instead, he asserts that the Superior Court erred by 

denying his motion seeking amendment of his presentence report, which was 

1 See, e.g., Desmond v. State, 2022 WL 16570935 (Del. Oct. 31, 2022) (affirming denial of 

sixteenth motion for postconviction relief). 

2 Desmond v. State, No. 567, 2014, Docket Entry No. 22 (Del. Feb. 11, 2015). 
3

completed thirty years ago. His response does not address the deficiencies in his 

incomplete, unsigned motion and affidavit to proceed in forma pauperis. The appeal 

is therefore dismissed. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rule 29(b), 

that the appeal is DISMISSED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. 

 Chief Justice
No. 65508.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/17049, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with the stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to September 10, 1955, at 50 cents per dozen, but not less than 45 percent nor inore than 70 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 212, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802),. supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), and (b) all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after September 10, 1955, at 45 percent under said paragraph, as modified *443by the Japanese Protocol to tbe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877).
EPA SANITIZED
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 40
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 40
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 40
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 40
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 40
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 40
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 40
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 40
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 40
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 40
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 40
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 40
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 40
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 40
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 40
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 40
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 40
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 40
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 40
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 40
 

EPA SANITIZED
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 40
EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 40
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 40
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 40
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 40
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 40
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 40
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 40
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 31 of 40
EPA SANITIZED Page 32 of 40
EPA SANITIZED Page 33 of 40
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 34 of 40
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 35 of 40
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 36 of 40
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 37 of 40
EPA SANITIZED Page 38 of 40
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 39 of 40
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 40 of 40
<PAGE>   1
                                                    EXHIBIT 21

                 SUNAMERICA INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


List of subsidiaries and certain other affiliates with percentage of voting 
securities owned by SunAmerica Inc. or SunAmerica Inc.'s subsidiary which is 
the immediate parent.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    PERCENTAGE OF VOTING
                                                    SECURITIES OWNED BY
                                                    COMPANY OR COMPANY'S
                                                    SUBSIDIARY WHICH IS
                                                    THE IMMEDIATE PARENT
                                                    ====================

NAME OF COMPANY
===============
<S>                                                 <C>
ARIZONA CORPORATIONS:                                           %
   Anchor National Life Insurance Company                      100
   SunAmerica Life Insurance Company of America                100
   SunAmerica National Life Insurance Company                  100

CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS:
   CalAmerica Life Insurance Company                           100
   Imperial Premium Finance, Inc.                              100
   Sentra Securities Corporation                               100
   Spellman & Co., Inc.                                        100

COLORADO CORPORATION:
   Resources Trust Company                                     100

DELAWARE CORPORATIONS:
   Imperial Premium Finance, Inc.                              100
   Imperial Premium Funding, Inc.                              100
   Royal Alliance Associates, Inc.                             100
   SunAmerica Asset Management Corp.                           100
   SunAmerica Capital Services, Inc.                           100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust II                                 100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust III                                100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust IV                                 100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust V                                  100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust VI                                 100
   SunAmerica Securities, Inc.                                 100

GEORGIA CORPORATIONS:
   FSC Service Corporation                                     100
   Keogler Investment Advisory, Inc.                           100
   SunAmerica Investments, Inc.                                100

NEW YORK CORPORATIONS:
   Advantage Capital Corporation                               100
   First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company                     100
</TABLE>
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA

VERSUS

JASON M. CHAFFIN

NO. 2021 KW 1627

FEBRUARY 14, 2022

In Re: Jason M. Chaffin, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 

497, 586. 

BEFORE: MCCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

PMC

JEW

MRT

URkTOFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY

A

LERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
----

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                    |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented. |

| Date:  | November 13 2009 |   | /s/ Jerry Treppel              |   |
|--------|------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|
|   |             |   | Jerry Treppel                  |   |
|   |             |   | Chief Executive Officer        |   |
|   |             |   | of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |   |
|   |             |   | (Principal Executive Officer)  |   |
No. P68/280.

protests 58/10496, etc. (Houston).

#### W. R. Zanes & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Beceworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicyles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard &*Co., *Mangano Cycles Co.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

 AIR AND RADIATION

July 2, 2015

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Files on CD for EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827-DRAFT-0453 for GEM – Greenhouse Gas 

Emission Model Executable File

FROM: Christine Brunner

Assessment and Standards Division

Office of Transportation and Air Quality

TO: Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and 

Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2 - Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827

The enclosed CD contains the following file associated with docket item EPA-HQ-OAR-201-0827-

DRAFT-0453. 

1) GEM_P2v1.0_setup_x64.exe

There is no restriction on this file.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TYRONE DANIEL JOHNSON, No. 2:04-cv-1523-MCE-GGH-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

YOLO COUNTY DEPARTMENT

OF HUMAN SERVICES, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On November 10, 2005, the magistrate judge filed Findings

and Recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and

which contained notice to Plaintiff that any Objections to the

Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within twenty (20)

days.

Case 2:04-cv-01523-MCE -GGH Document 25 Filed 03/08/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has filed Objections to the Findings and

Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this Court has conducted a

de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to

be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 10,

2005, are adopted in full; 

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim

upon which relief can be granted.

DATED: March 7, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01523-MCE -GGH Document 25 Filed 03/08/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE ACCOMPANYING QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999             JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998             OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                   3,232
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                   3,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  60,352
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  70,707
<PP&E>                                               0                  21,942
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                 (4,263)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  93,832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  24,769
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                     190
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                  55,267
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  93,832
<SALES>                                         60,585                 190,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,585                 190,712
<CGS>                                           39,984                 124,835
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,984                 124,835
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,001                  67,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 309                     751
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,709)                 (2,701)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,709)                 (2,701)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,709)                 (2,701)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.14)                  (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)                  (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #122003 Limited Partner (the
Partnership) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Nancy J. McGurk, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) 
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) 
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/Nancy J. McGurk
| | --- | ------------------

| | Name: | Nancy J. McGurk
| | ----- | ---------------

| | Title: | Chief Financial
                Officer of the Managing General Partner
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Date: | August 16,2004
| | ----- | --------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE SPITTAL,

Plaintiff,

v.

JAY SCHENIRER, et al.,

 Defendants.

CIV. S-04-1198 GEB PAN PS

ORDER OF RECUSAL

—NFN—

 I hereby recuse myself pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(b)(1)

upon the ground I have a personal bias or prejudice against

plaintiff George Spittal. The clerk is directed to reassign

this matter to another magistrate judge accordingly.

So ordered.

Dated: June 20, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 26 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 1