alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CAROL ROYE,

Plaintiff, CIV S-04-2192 DFL KJM PS

v.

FAIR ISAAC AND COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Presently calendared for hearing on May 24, 2006 is defendant Providian’s motion for judgment

on the pleadings. No opposition has been filed. Plaintiff has previously been advised of the

requirements for filing opposition but has once again failed to comply with the Local Rules.

Plaintiff is reminded that Local Rule 78-230(c) provides that opposition to the

granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule

further provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral

arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In

addition, Local Rule 78-230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of

opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that

failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions

Case 2:04-cv-02192-DFL -KJM Document 41 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of May 24, 2006 is vacated. Hearing on defendant’s motion

for judgment on the pleadings is continued to June 21, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26.

2. Plaintiff shall file opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss, no later than

May 31, 2006. Failure to file opposition and appear at the hearing will be deemed as a statement

of non-opposition and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed against

defendant LandSafe under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: May 16, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

roye2.nop

Case 2:04-cv-02192-DFL -KJM Document 41 Filed 05/17/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of General Steel Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Corporation”), does hereby certify that:



The Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q/A”) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|/s/ Zuosheng Yu               | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Zuosheng Yu                   | 
|Chief Executive Officer       | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) | 
|August 29, 2012               | 



|/s/ John Chen                 | 
|----------------------------- | 
|John Chen                     | 
|Chief Financial Officer       | 
|(Principal Financial Officer) | 
|August 29, 2012               |
# sec6_rsnc_2023

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSNC - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2022
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Edward A. Stern, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation for the year ended June 30, 2004;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.



4. The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



5.
The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/ Edward A. Stern,    
|Chief Financial Officer 
|                        
|Date: September 24, 2004
<PAGE>
                               Exhibit 32.2





                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warning Model Management, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10QSB/A for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Stanley Tepper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




 /s/  Stanley Tepper
 ------------------------------
 Stanley Tepper
 Chief Financial Officer
 November 24, 2003


                                       27
No. 50971.

#### Protest 100211-K of Olavarria & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the importer’s oath of short shipment and the United States weigher’s return of weight were offered in evidence. The affidavit of short shipment was admitted in evidence for the sole purpose of establishing that it had been filed in accordance with the regulations. An examination of the entry papers disclosed that the collector assessed duty upon the basis of the net weight of 3,633 bags of sugar. The weigher found a net weight for the 3,624 bags as 358,924 pounds.- From the weight thereof, the average net weight of the nine missing bags was estimated at a total of 891 pounds, bringing the total net weight of the shipment up to 359,815 pounds. No attempt was made by the plaintiff to establish that the nine bags of sugarwere *not*landed in the United States or received by the company. It was held that the plaintiff had failed to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. *(Altman*v. *United States,*13 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 868, followed.) The protest was therefore overruled.
================================================================================

EXHIBIT  31.1 CERTIFICATION


I, Kevin Kelly, President, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Patient
Portal Technologies, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this quarterly report fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
theequivalent functions):

         a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

         6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated: 11/14/07          /s/ KEVIN KELLY
                        ----------------------
                        Kevin Kelly
                        President, Director




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before the Third Division,

December 19, 1941

No. 46712.

#### Protest 68266-K of Sterling Linens, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty as claimed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [AZ-210-07-1220-DA-241A] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting, off-road vehicle route designations. 

# SUMMARY:

To comply with CFR 8340, Off-Road Vehicles, and land use planning for the Bureau of Land Management, Phoenix District, Hassayampa Field Office, Arizona, three route designation public meetings will be held. The purpose of these meetings is to inform the public of the process that will be used, the type of input from the public that would be helpful, and the general schedule leading to final route designations. Maps will be available. Input from the public regarding route connectivity, existing conflicts, and current or desired access will be taken. 

# DATES:

Meetings will be held beginning at 6:30 p.m. and conclude at 8 p.m. as follows: April 24, 2007, at Deer Valley Senior Center, 2001 West Wahalla Lane, Phoenix, Arizona; April 25, 2007, at Morristown Elementary School, 25950 Rockaway Hills Drive, Morristown, Arizona; and April 26, 2007, at Albins Civic Center, 19005 East K-Mine Road Center, Black Canyon City, Arizona. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rich Hanson, Bureau of Land Management, 21605 North 7th Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85027, 623-580-5500. 

Clay Templin, 

Field Manager. 

[FR Doc. E7-4245 Filed 3-8-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-32-P
Exhibit 10(c)

                      AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

           THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is entered
into as of April 10, 2000, between JACOBSON STORES INC., a Michigan
corporation of Jackson, Michigan (the "Company"), and JAMES A. RODEFELD, of
Jackson, Michigan ("Rodefeld").

           THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE that the restated Employment Agreement
between them dated as of June 11, 1998, as amended effective April 11, 1999
(the "Agreement"), is further amended effective April 16, 2000, as follows:

           Compensation. The phrase "Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($250,000)" in paragraph 2 of the amended Agreement is amended to read "Three
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000)".

           Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue
in full force and effect.


IN THE PRESENCE OF:                    JACOBSON STORES INC.



/s/  Dana J. Collins                   By: /s/ P. Gerald Mills
---------------------------                ---------------------------------
                                             P. Gerald Mills
                                             Its: Chairman of the Board and
                                                      Chief Executive Officer







/s/  Timothy J. Spalding               /s/  James A. Rodefeld
---------------------------            -------------------------------------
                                       James A. Rodefeld
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the March
31, 1997 Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                            5154
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    69976
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3339
<INVENTORY>                                     134269
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                216050
<PP&E>                                          274577
<DEPRECIATION>                                  169379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  351558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            58483
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         69674
<OTHER-SE>                                      185247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    351558
<SALES>                                          97606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 97606
<CGS>                                            64235
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    64235
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   456
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   4802
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1753
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3049
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3049
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN RAY BRUMMETT JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1797 GEB JFM P

vs.

CLAIR TESKE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On February 24, 2006, plaintiff has filed a letter addressed to this court appended

to which are discovery documents that plaintiff represents he has sent to defendants and their

attorney. Plaintiff is informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests and

that neither discovery requests served on an opposing party nor that party's responses should be

filed until such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the

court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties

shall not be filed with the court unless, and until, they are at issue. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s February 24, 2006 letter

and the documents appended thereto will be disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that further filing

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01797-GEB -JFM Document 63 Filed 06/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in an order of

sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

DATED: June 5, 2006.

12

brum1797.411

Case 2:04-cv-01797-GEB -JFM Document 63 Filed 06/07/06 Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 52007BP0115(01) - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007BP0115(01)

**1. European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia for the financial year 2005 (C6-0389/2006 - 2006/2156(DEC)) **

*
Official Journal 074 E , 20/03/2008 P. 0196 - 0197 *

1.

European Parliament decision of 24 April 2007 on the discharge for the implementation of the budget of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia for the financial year 2005 (C6-0389/2006 — 2006/2156(DEC))

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the final annual accounts of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia for the financial year 2005 [1],

- having regard to the Court of Auditors' report on the final annual accounts of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia for the financial year 2005, together with the Centre's replies [2],

- having regard to the Council's recommendation of 27 February 2007 (5711/2007 — C6-0080/2007),

- having regard to the EC Treaty, and in particular Article 276 thereof,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities [3], and in particular Article 185 thereof,

- having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1035/97 of 2 June 1997 establishing a European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia [4], and in particular Article 12a thereof,

- having regard to Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002 of 19 November 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 [5], and in particular Article 94 thereof,

- having regard to Rule 71 of and Annex V to its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the Report of the Committee on Budgetary Control and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0118/2007),

1. Grants the director of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia discharge for the implementation of the Centre's budget for the financial year 2005;

2. Sets out its observations in the resolution below;

3. Instructs its President to forward this decision and the resolution that forms an integral part of it to the director of the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the Official Journal of the European Union (L series).

[1] OJ C 266, 31.10.2006, p. 46.

[2] OJ C 312, 19.12.2006, p. 93.

[3] OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1995/2006 (OJ L 390, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

[4] OJ L 151, 10.6.1997, p. 1. Regulation as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1652/2003 (OJ L 245, 29.9.2003, p. 33).

[5] OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72.

--------------------------------------------------