alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5707] 

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.*; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875],                               ( print page 9608)                            I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Great Britons: Treasures from the National Portrait Gallery, London”, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the National Portrait Gallery, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, from on or about April 27, 2007, until on or about September 3, 2007, and at possible additional venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Wolodymyr Sulzynsky, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: (202) 453-8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547-0001. 

Dated: February 26, 2007. 

C. Miller Crouch, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. E7-3674 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICHOLAUS RAMONE EDWARDS,

aka ANSAR MUHAMMAD,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1127 KJM P

vs.

 

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ

of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On February 23, 2010, petitioner filed a motion in

which he asks that this matter be referred back to District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton because

petitioner never consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction. However, the record before the court

indicates that petitioner did consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction in a document he filed on 

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

1

Case 2:04-cv-01127-TJB Document 39 Filed 03/04/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

June 28, 2004. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s “motion to amend due to

clerical mistake” (#36) is denied. 

DATED: March 3, 2010. 

1

edwa1127.con

2

Case 2:04-cv-01127-TJB Document 39 Filed 03/04/10 Page 2 of 2
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,735-02

EX PARTE CHARLES DEVON WASSERMAN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 12-10-11,721-A IN THE 24 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM DEWITT COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to ninety-nine

years’ imprisonment. The ThirteenthCourt of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Wasserman v. State,

13-13-00144-CR (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburgh Aug. 14, 2014)(not designated for

publication). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction,

and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel was ineffective by failing to

consult and hire an expert witness, failing to effectively cross-examine witnesses, failing to call

favorable witnesses, and failing to properly investigate the case and the complainant’s medical

records. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is

the appropriate forum for findings of fact. TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). Trial counsel

has already submitted an affidavit and testified in a habeas hearing held on March 4, 2022. If the

trial court believes further information or testimony would assist in the making of his findings of

fact, the trial court may obtain a supplemental affidavit or hold an additional hearing. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, considering

the totality of the circumstances, the common-law doctrine of laches bars equitable reliefin this case. 

Ex parte Perez, 398 S.W.3d 206 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The trial court shall also make findings

of fact and conclusions of law as to whether, in light of the totality of the evidence presented at trial,

trial counsel’s performance was deficient and Applicant was prejudiced. The trial court may make

any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: April 20, 2022

Do not publish
No. 46713.

#### Protest 71341-K of Jordan Marsh Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) the merchandise in question was held not subject to countervailing duty as claimed.
1

00691991.WPD

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Russell G. Porter, SBN 041020

Martin N. Jensen, SBN 232231

350 University Ave., Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

TEL: 916.929.1481

FAX: 916.927.3706

WILCOXEN, CALLAHAN, MONTGOMERY & DEACON

Daniel E. Wilcoxen, SBN 054805

2114 K Street

Sacramento, California 95816

(916) 442-2777 (telephone)

(916) 442-4118 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KATHLEEN ELLIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHLEEN ELLIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

HOLLISTER, INC., et al.,

Defendants.

 

Case No. CIV.S-04-1358 WBS GGH

[Consolidated Action Master Case

Number]

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING

P L A I N TIF F ’ S EX P A R T E

APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 553 Filed 06/12/09 Page 1 of 2
2

00691991.WPD

Good cause having been shown consistent with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure section

16(b)(4), the Court hereby grants Plaintiff’s ex parte request to further modify the Status Pretrial

Scheduling Order.

The Status Pretrial Scheduling Order shall be further modified as follows:

Plaintiffs’ pretrial statement shall be filed on August 10, 2009. Defendants’ pretrial statement

shall be filed on August 17, 2009. The final pretrial conference is hereby moved to August 24, 2009,

at 2:00 p.m. in courtroom 5.

Dated: June 12, 2009

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 553 Filed 06/12/09 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS WAYNE PERRY,

 Plaintiff,

v.

PAUL ZUPAN, SUZIE ZUPAN,

LATITUDE FINANCIAL 

INCORPORATED,

 Defendants.

CIV S-04-0868 DFL PAN (JFM) PS

ORDER

On June 9, 2006, the Magistrate Judge vacated his May 4, 2006 order denying

defendants’ April 14, 2006 motion for summary judgment and set the matter for hearing on July

27, 2006. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for reconsideration filed May 17, 2006, is hereby

DENIED as moot. 

DATED: 6/12/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00868-JAM-EFB Document 36 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE McGEE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1603 GEB DAD P

vs.

O. DICKINSON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a second amended complaint

pursuant to the court’s order of May 13, 2005. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s May 25, 2005 application for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a

second amended complaint.

DATED: June 3, 2005.

DAD:bb

rich1603.36(2) 

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 12 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 1
November 13, 1957

No. 61355.

protests 282339-K, 282340-K, and 282341-K.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

C. D. 1887. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
AFS-16-8938-E April 15, 2016

Exemption No. 10679B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-1208

Ms. Sheryl L. Oxley

Aviation Maintenance C oordinator/Instructor

Tulsa Tech

801 E. 91 st Street Tulsa, OK 74132

Dear Mr. Dickson:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 10679, as amended. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 2, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Tulsa Tech for an extension of Exemption No. 10679, as amended. That exemption from § 147.21 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) permits Tulsa Tech students that participat e in the KidVenture/Oshkosh AirVenture program and allows authorized faculty members of Tulsa Tech to determine if the student time dedicated to preparing for and participating in the KidVen ture/Oshkosh AirVenture program activities may

be considered creditable to satisfy the requirements of § 147.21.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to Tulsa Tech.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justificati on for the issuance of Exemption No. 10679, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant Tulsa Tech (TT) an exemption from 14 CFR § 147.21 to allow Tulsa Tech students that partic ipate in the KidVenture/Oshkosh AirVenture program, and to allow authorized faculty member s of Tulsa Tech to determine if the student time dedicated to preparing for and particip ating in the KidVentu re/Oshkosh AirVenture program activities may be considered credit able to satisfy the requirements of § 147.21, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. The exemption is valid only for substitu tion of the curriculum requirements of § 147.21 for the purpose of student participa tion in KidVenture/Oshkosh AirVenture program activities.

2. Only authorized faculty me mbers of Tulsa Tech, whose students participate, may determine if the student’s time (dedicated to preparing for, and participating in, the KidVenture/Oshkosh AirVenture activities) may be considered creditable to satisfy the requirements of § 147.21.

3. Creditable time is limited to a maximum of 42 hours per participating student, per

year.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 10679, as amended, to May 31, 2018, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

//s//

John Barbagallo Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service
Order filed, September 17, 2013.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 13

- 00218

- CR

____________

DANIEL MICAH VERMILY EA , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 176th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1335846



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due August 5, 2013. See Tex. R. App.

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record.

Volume 4 of t he record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s

record has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Marcia Barnett, the court reporter, to file Volume 4 of the record

in this appeal within 20 days of the date of this order

.PER CURIAM
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.B CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2006, of
El Paso Exploration
& Production Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dane E. Whitehead, Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify (i) that
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that
the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. /s/ Dane E. WhiteheadDane E. WhiteheadSenior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)August 7, 2006
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Exploration
& Production Company and will be retained by El Paso Exploration & Production
Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 49656.

#### Protests 977587-G/88284, etc., of Joseph Antognoli & Co. et al. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

On cheese similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 42146, an allowance of 2)4 percent was made to compensate for the weight of foreign substances on the outside, and in Reggiano cheese similar to that involved in *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 d. 270, C. D. 706) an allowancé of 1 percent was made.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Brian Christman,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-0884 FCD PAN P

vs. Order

California Department of

Corrections, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoOctober 28, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for a

preliminary injunction without the proof of service required by

Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 and Local Rule 5-135. Plaintiff shall file a

proof of service within ten days. Otherwise the court will take

no action on it.

So ordered.

Dated: December 13, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00884-FCD-EFB Document 44 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9324]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3604]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-178-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Proposed 
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

February 23, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 20, 2007, Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation (Transco) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, Ninth Revised Sheet No. 250A, 
Original Sheet No. 374V, and Original Sheet No. 374V.01, to become 
effective March 22, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1f595a4d5c50717376717a4c6a6f6f706d6b5f797a6d7c31787069"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c3a392e3f3312101512192f090c0c130e083c1a190e1f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3604 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |
|--------|--------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 11, 2011 | By:  | /s/ Yongqing Ma                                            |
|-----------------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |      | Yongqing MaChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |

----
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of m-Wise, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Gabriel Kabazo, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:





(1)  the Report fully
comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gabriel KabazoGabriel
      Kabazo, Chief Financial OfficerDated:
      November 13, 2009
<PAGE>   1



<PAGE> 1

                                   EXHIBIT 21

                  SUNAMERICA INC. AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES

List of subsidiaries and certain other affiliates with percentage of voting
securities owned by SunAmerica Inc. or SunAmerica Inc.'s subsidiary which is
the immediate parent.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     PERCENTAGE OF VOTING
                                                     SECURITIES OWNED BY    
                                                     COMPANY OR COMPANY'S
                                                     SUBSIDIARY WHICH IS THE
NAME OF COMPANY                                      IMMEDIATE PARENT
===============                                      =======================
<S>                                                          <C>
ARIZONA CORPORATIONS:                                         %
   Anchor National Life Insurance Company                     100
   SunAmerica Life Insurance Company of America               100
   SunAmerica National Life Insurance Company                 100

CALIFORNIA CORPORATIONS:
   CalFarm Life Insurance Company                             100
   Imperial Premium Finance of California, Inc.               100

COLORADO CORPORATION:
   Resources Trust Company                                    100

DELAWARE CORPORATIONS:
   Royal Alliance Associates, Inc.                            100
   SunAmerica Asset Management Corp.                          100
   SunAmerica Capital Services, Inc.                          100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust II                                100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust III                               100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust IV                                100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust V                                 100
   SunAmerica Capital Trust VI                                100
   SunAmerica Fund Services, Inc.                             100
   Imperial Premium Finance, Inc.                             100
   SunAmerica Securities, Inc.                                100

GEORGIA CORPORATIONS:
   SunAmerica Financial, Inc.                                 100
   Koegler Investment Advisory, Inc.                          100

NEW YORK CORPORATIONS:
   Advantage Capital Corporation                              100
   First SunAmerica Life Insurance Company                    100
   John Alden Life Insurance Company of New York              100
</TABLE>