alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


             Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                           and Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                the Report.




                               /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


                               /s/ Christine R. Piano
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Christine R. Piano
                               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


February 8, 2007
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                             ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.
         SCHEDULE OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                        AND PREFERRED UNIT DISTRIBUTIONS
                         (In thousands, except ratios)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    NINE MONTHS ENDED   YEAR ENDED     YEAR ENDED    YEAR ENDED
                                                       SEPTEMBER 30,   DECEMBER 31,   DECEMBER 31,  DECEMBER 31,
                                                           1998            1997           1996          1995
                                                    -----------------  ------------   ------------  ------------
<S>                                                       <C>           <C>            <C>            <C>    
EARNINGS:
 Income before minority interests and
    extraordinary item                                    $29,667        $34,146        $14,970        $14,244
  Interest expense                                         14,259         12,659         11,442         10,928
  Amortization of deferred financing costs                    553            509            639          1,355
                                                          -------        -------        -------        -------
  TOTAL EARNINGS                                          $44,479        $47,314        $27,051        $26,527
                                                          -------        -------        -------        -------


FIXED CHARGES:
  Interest expense                                        $14,259        $12,659        $11,442        $10,928
  Convertible preferred unit distributions                  2,625          2,681            635             --
  Perpetual preferred unit distributions                    3,789             --             --             --
  Amortization of deferred financing costs                    553            509            639          1,355
  Capitalized interest                                      2,575          1,276            115             92
                                                          -------        -------        -------        -------
  TOTAL FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED
    UNIT DISTRIBUTIONS                                    $23,801        $17,125        $12,831        $12,375

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
  (EXCLUDING PREFERRED UNIT DISTRIBUTIONS)                   2.51X          3.28X          2.22X          2.14X
                                                          =======        =======        =======        =======

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED
  CHARGES AND PREFERRED DISTRIBUTIONS                        1.83X          2.76X          2.11X          2.14X
                                                          =======        =======        =======        =======
</TABLE>
Exhibit 21**SUBSIDIARIES**     Listedbelow are the principal subsidiaries and affiliates of KaiserAluminum & Chemical Corporation,the jurisdiction of their incorporation or organization, and the names under which suchsubsidiaries do business. The Company’s ownership is indicated for less than wholly ownedaffiliates. Certain subsidiaries are omitted which, considered in the aggregate as a singlesubsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.     **Place of**  **Incorporation or****Name** **Organization**Anglesey Aluminium Limited (49%) United KingdomKaiserAluminium International, Inc.(l) DelawareKaiser Aluminum & Chemical of Canada Limited(l) OntarioKaiser Bellwood Corporation(l) Delaware (1) Filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under the Code. (2) Entities that have been materially affected as a result of the commodity asset sales, asdiscussed more fully in Note 1 and 5 of Notes to ConsolidatedFinancial Statements.
 

 
     Principal Domestic Operations Arizona South Carolinaand Administrative Offices      Chandler      Greenwood(Partial List)           Fabricated Products           Fabricated Products       California Tennessee       Foothill Ranch      Jackson            Corporate Headquarters           Fabricated Products       Los Angeles (City of Commerce) Texas       Fabricated Products      Houston          Administrative Offices  Michigan      Sherman       Detroit (Southfield)           Fabricated Products            Automotive Product              Development and Sales Virginia         Richmond              Fabricated Products       Ohio Washington       Newark      Richland            Fabricated Products           Fabricated Products       Oklahoma Trentwood       Tulsa          Fabricated Products      Fabricated ProductsWales, United KingdomPrincipal Worldwide Operations(Partial List) Canada     Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical of        Anglesey Aluminium Ltd.               (49%)                 Canada limited (100%)           Primary Aluminum            Fabricated Products
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIKE YELLEN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-01-2398 MCE GGH P

vs.

DIANE BUTLER, 

Respondents.

 /

JEFFREY BIGGS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1169 FCD GGH P

vs.

GRAY DAVIS, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

NOEL VALDIVIA,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-05-0416 FCD DAD P

vs.

JILL BROWN, et al., NON-RELATED CASE ORDER

Respondents.

_____________________________/

Case 2:04-cv-01169-FCD-GGH Document 31 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has received the Notice of Related Cases concerning the abovecaptioned cases filed March 2, 2005. See Local Rule 83-123, E.D. Cal. The court has

determined, however, that it is inappropriate to relate or reassign the cases, and therefore declines

to do so. This order is issued for informational purposes only and shall have no effect on the

status of the 

cases.

DATED: 5/2/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

yel.rel

Case 2:04-cv-01169-FCD-GGH Document 31 Filed 05/03/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 59553.

protest 237506-K (New York).

#### Reichard-Coulston, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 30, 2013

p0923

Order 

Clerk

September 30, 2013

147185

FREDERICK P. HODGE, II,

Claimant-Appellant,

v SC: 147185

COA: 311019

Oakland CC: 2012-124839-AE

MICHIGAN FIRST CREDIT UNION,

Respondent-Appellee,

and 

DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND

REGULATORY AFFAIRS/UNEMPLOYMENT 

INSURANCE AGENCY,

Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.1






























August 18, 2016


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Homebuilder Corporate Banking
2030 Main Street, Suite 800
Irvine, CA  92614
Attn:  Elena Bennett 

		
	Re:
	M/I Homes, Inc.


$5.0 Million Letter of Credit Facility; Loan WB16900


This letter is in reference to certain letters of credit issued by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the “Bank”) to third parties at the request of M/I Homes, Inc. (the “Applicant”) from time to time (including all extensions and increases thereof, the “Letters of Credit”) pursuant to that certain Continuing Letter of Credit Agreement dated June 4, 2010 in favor of the Bank (as amended, restated or modified from time to time, the “LOC Agreement”).  The Bank and the Applicant are also parties to that certain Security Agreement dated June 4, 2010 (as amended, restated or modified from time to time, the “Security Agreement”) pursuant to which the Applicant deposited into an account at the Bank certain cash collateral to secure the Applicant’s obligations with respect to the Letters of Credit and the LOC Agreement.  Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings given such terms in the LOC Agreement.
This letter confirms our agreement to terminate the LOC Agreement effective September 1, 2016 (the “Termination Date”), and acknowledges that on such Termination Date there are no Letters of Credit remaining outstanding pursuant to the LOC Agreement. 




Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
August 18, 2016
Page 2















Sincerely,


M/I Homes, Inc.






                                            
Name:    Kevin C. Hake
Title:    Senior Vice President and Treasurer    








Acknowledged and Agreed:


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 






                        
Name:  Elena Bennett 
Title:    Senior Vice President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Defendants’ First Request for Extension of Time to File a Motion for Summary Judgment

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JULIUS LEE JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:04-cv-0983 LKK GGH P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO FILE A MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

The Court, having considered Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file a

motion for summary judgment, and good cause having been found.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The deadline for both parties to file a dispositive motion

is extended to May 26, 2006. 

DATED: 4/21/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

______________________________________ 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

jack0983.po.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-00983-LKK -GGH Document 64 Filed 04/24/06 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit      32.1**

|   | 1. | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended September 30, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE:  | November                7, 2005 |   | BY:    | /S/                Scott V. Fainor                              |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                            |   |   | Scott                V. Fainor                                  |
|   |                            |   |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer            |
|   |                            |   |   |                                                            |
|   |                            |   |   |                                                            |
|   |                            |   |   |                                                            |
| DATE:  | November                7, 2005 |   | BY:    | /S/                Eugene T. Sobol                              |
|   |                            |   |   | Eugene                T. Sobol                                  |
|   |                            |   |   | Senior                Executive Vice President, Chief Financial |
|   |                            |   |   | Officer                and Treasurer                            |

----
No. 6561.

#### JOSEPH LALONIER vs. PHILIP WERLEIN CO., LTD.

Syllabus.

Parties undertaking to take the law in their own hands instead of resorting to legal process should be made to feel the weight of judicial condemnation.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “D,” No. 109,469. Honorable Porter Parker, Judge.

Robert 0 ’Connor, for plaintiff and appellant.

Merrick, Gensler & Schwarz, for defendant and appellee.

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

*236There can he no question as to plaintiff’s right to recover damages for the unwarranted trespass committed by defendant. For the evidence is uneontradicted that defendant’s employees, acting under its instructions, and without the consent, knowledge or authority of plaintiff or his wife, and during their absence, unlawfully entered their home and carried away a piano which they had purchased from defendant on the installment plan. In order to collect the past due installment of the price, defendant deliberately took the law in its own hands instead of resorting to the process provided by law for enforcing payment.

The trial Court properly ordered the return of the piano and recognized defendant’s claim and privilege for the balance of the purchase price; but it was an error not to have condemned defendant in damages for its unlawful trespass and conversion. Though'the act was not accompanied by violence it should nevertheless be the subject of judicial condemnation; and we are of opinion that, considering that plaintiff’s home has been invaded and that he has now been deprived of the use of the piano since July, 1914, an award of $200 damages is justifiable.

Thompson vs. Coupland, 6 Ct. of App., 403.

Gerstner vs. Crescent Ice Co., 8 Ct. of App., 209.

Washington vs. Singer Sewing Machine Co., No. 5850 of our docket.

Greenlee vs. Singer Sewing Machine Co., No. 5851 of our docket.

Bettis vs. Singer Sewing Machine Co., No. 5852 of our docket.

Evans vs. Grunewald Piano Co., No. 6173 of our docket.

Act 62 of 1877, E. S., p. 102.

*237Opinion and decree, February 28th, 1916.

The case of Jenks vs. Home Co., 34 A., 1241, is inapplicable, for as was said in Van Wren vs. Flynn, 34 A., 1158, the trespass and removal were accomplished with plaintiff’s knowledge and consent.

The judgment is accordingly reversed in so far as it rejects plaintiff’s claim- for damages and it is now decreed on that score that plaintiff have judgment against defendant for $200, with legal interest from date until paid, the costs of the trial 'Court on the main demand ■-and all costs of this appeal to be borne by defendant, and the costs of the trial Court on the reconventional demand to be paid by plaintiff, and as thus altered and amended the judgment in all other respects is affirmed.

Reversed in part.
Before the Second Division,

June 6, 1968

No. P68/259.

protest 64/24603 (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Becrworti-i, J.

In accordance with stipulation of comisel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard &*Co., *Mangano Cycles Co.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.6




    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.
(the "Issuer") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Curtis J. Clawson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Issuer.


/s/ Curtis J. Clawson
-------------------------------

Curtis J. Clawson
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
June 16, 2003


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Issuer for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Amendment
      No. 1 to the Annual
      Report on Form 10-K of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ending
      December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof (the “Report”), I, Amir Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Amir Rosenthal


Amir
      Rosenthal


Chief
      Financial Officer


October
      18, 2006





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
      18 of
      the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing. A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the
      Company and will
      be retained by the
      Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
(Reap. Dec. 10384)

Entry No. 219, etc.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 4, 1962)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows :

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise which is the subject of the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of phonograph records exported from Mexico after January 1,1960.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that phonograph records are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in *471condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for re-appraisement listed in Schedule B are hereby submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the phonograph records in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the prices shown in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.