### TUNNEL KILN SCRUBBER and SHAPES KILN EX$AUST COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT GLEN-GERY CORPORATION IBERIA, OHIO Testing Date: Apri126, 2006

Prepared for: Mr. Jerry Carrier Glen-Gery Corporation 423 S. Pottsville Pike, Box 340 Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555

Prepared by: Air/Compliance Consultants, Inc, 1050 William Pitt Way Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15238 412-826-3636 Project Number: 06-046



# Air/C®mpliance C®nsultnnts, inc.

### TUNNEL KILN SCRUBBER and SIIAPES ICILN EXHAUST COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT GLEN-GERY CORPORATION IBERIA, OHIO Testing Date: April 26, 2006

AIR/COMPLIANCE CONSULTANTS, INC. 

# (Iv'

~ 

# xv ~

**

, 

# ~ /

J0

— 

### James E. Philhppi 

### Senior Project Manager



# ~ Robert N. Frey 

### Vice President

### TABLE OF CONTENTS Pap-e



### 1

, 

### INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1 FIELD PERSONNEL ................................................................................................................. 1 3, SOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ANY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES ................... 1 4. PLANT PROCESS DATA ......................................................................................................... 2 5, TEST METHODS SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 2 5.1, STACK GAS VELOCITY AND VOLUMETRIC FLOW RATE

— 

### USEPA METHODS1 AND 2 ........................................................................................................ 2 5.2. OXYGEN AND CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS

— 

### USEPA METHOD 3 ................. 3 5,3. DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT IN STACK GASES

— 

### USEPA METHOD4 ........................................................................................................................ 3 5.4, PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS

— 

### USEPA METHOD 5 ....................................3 5.5. SLJLFLJR DIOXIDE EMISSIONS

— 

### USEPA METHOD 6 ............................................... 3 5.6, HYDROGEN FLLJORIDE AND HYDROGEN CHLORIDE EMISSIONS

— 

### USEPA METHOD26A .................................................................................................................. 4 6. TESTING LOCATION ................................................................................................................ 4 7, DEVIATIONS FROM THE PROTOCOL ................................................................................. 5 8

, 

### TESTING RESULTS
................................................................................................................... 5 9

. 

### CONCLUSIONS
........................................................................................................................ 5 

### TABLES 1, PM, HCI, and HF Test Results, Tunnel Kiln Outlet 2. Sulfiur Dioxide Test Results, Tunnel Kiln Outlet 3. PM, HCI, and HF Test Results, Shapes Kiln Outlet 4. Sulfur Dioxide Test Results, Shapes Kiln Outlet 5, Stack Test Calculations 

### APPENDICES A. Testing Protocol B. Plant Process Data C, Field and Computerized Data Sheets D. Laboratory Results E. Equipment Calibrations F. Sample Calculations G. Material Balance Data

### TUNNEL KILN SCRUBBER and SFIAPES KILN EXIIAUST COMPLIANCE TEST REPORT GLEN-GERY CORPORATION IBERIA, OIIIO
1. INTRODUCTIONAir/Compliance Consultants, Inc. (ACCI) perfonned a compliance testing program for GlenGery Corporation (Glen-Gery) on their Tunnel and Shape Kiln Outlets. Testing was performed to demonstrate compliance with Title V renewal testing requirements and Permit to Install (PTI) requirements and to establish the site as a synthetic minor hazardous air pollutant (HAP) source. Testing was performed for hydrogen fluoride (HF), hydrogen chloride (HCI), sulfur dioxide (SOZ), and particulate matter (PM) on the Tunnel and Shapes (also known as Shuttle Kiln) Kiln Outlets. A copy of'the testing protocol is located in Appendix A. 

### 2. FIELD PERSONNEL Testing was performed April 26, 2006 by Mr. .Tames Phillippi, Senior Project Scientist; Mr. William Cowell, Senior Engineer; Mr. Michael Cowser, Project Scientist; and Mr. Michael Matvey, Scientist of ACCI. Mr. Jay Pennwell of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency witnessed a portion of the testing program. Mr. Brett Chronister of Glen-Gery served as a liaison for the testing team. 

### 3. SOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ANY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES Glen-Gery operates a brick manufacturing plant in Iberia, Marion County, Ohio. This plant produces a variety of brick products in both residential and commercial sizes and with a full range of product colors, from traditional red brick to gray/white buff-colored brick. The Iberia operation uses seven tunnel dryers, one Tunnel Kiln, and one Shapes (Shuttle) Kiln to produce the final products. The cars carrying green brick move on tracks through the dryers and kilns. Natural gas is the only fuel used to fire the kilns and dryers. The tunnel kiln is equipped with a dry limestone adsorber (DLA) to control HF emissions prior to venting to the atmosphere.

### 2

The DLA unit is Hellmich Model No, FKA 594/350-CT. A top-mounted silo stores approximately 30 cubic meters of crushed limestone granules. The DLA is comprised of a limestone cascade tower with a top mounted limestone feed section. Crushed limestone is delivered to the site via truck and distributed to the tower bin pneumatically. The crushed limestone trickles vertically from the top mounted storage section and passes through horizontal cascades located in the reaction chamber sections of the tower. The DLA is further described in the protocol in Appendix A.
4. PLANT PROCESS DATA Glen-Gery personnel recorded the following process parameters during the testing program for each kiln exhaust: • Kiln througbput (tons frred brick/hour) • Type of brick in kiln during testing • Pressure drop across the DLA • Limestone feed rate Plant process data is located in Appendix B. 5. TEST METHODS SUMMARY Testing was conducted following the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA), Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 60, Appendix A Testing Methods 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 26A. 5.1. Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate — USEPA Methods 1 and 2 USEPA Method 1 was followed to select sample points across the exhaust stack. The presence or absence of cyclonic flow was verified as per USEPA Method 1, Section 11.4 on the exhaust stacks. i1SEPA Method 2 was followed for the determination of gas velocity and volumetric flow rate. This procedure utilized an S-type Pitot tube and inclined manometer to determine stack-gas velocity head. Gas temperature measurements were made using a Type K thermocouple and

49HPROJEC11GIen-Gery &icklW-04616erialCompiience 7eslinBlReportlCompiience Repml Coc

### 3

digital pyrometer. 

### USEPA Method 

### 2 was use'd in conjunction with 

### USEPA Methods 3 and 4 to determine the gas velocity and volumetric flow rate at the stack. 5.2. Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Emissions — USEPA Method 3 Carbon dioxide (COz), oxygen (Oz), and stack-gas molecular weight were analyzed and obtained in accordance with 

### USEPA Method 

### 3, Fyrite gas analyzers were used in the sampling. Three grab samples were taken during each test run. Nitrogen (NZ) was determined by the difference. 5.3. Determination of Moisture Content in Stack Gases — USEPA Method 4 The flue gas moisture content at the stack was determined in accordance with 

### USEPA Method 4. The gas moisture was determined by quantitatively condensing stack gas in chilled impingers and a silica gel absorber. The amount of moishrre condensed was determined by the volume of condensate collected in the impingers and silica gel. 

### A dry gas meter was used to measure the volume of gas sampled. The amount of water condensed and the volume of gas sampled were used to calculate the gas moisture content. Moisture determinations were performed on each test run to allow determination of dry stack-gas molecular weight and to calculate the dry standard cubic feet per minute (DSCFM) flow rate.. The moisture train sampling was combined with the 

### t.TSEPA Method 

### 5/26A, and 

### 6 sampling for each outlet testing location. 5.4. Particulate Matter Emissions — USEPA Method 5 PM emissions were determined in accordance with 

### USEPA Method 

### 5. A sample was drawn isokinetically from the gas stream and collected in a glass nozzle, probe, and on a heated, tared Teflon or quartz filter. 

### A series of glass impingers were used to collect moisture. 

### A calibrated dry gas meter measured the gas sample volume which was at least 

### 36 dry standard cubic feet (DSCF). Sample recovery procedures followed 

### USEPA Method 

### 5 guidelines and samples were analyzed by 

### ACCI, This sampling train was combined with the 

### USEPA Method 

### 26A sampling train. 5.5. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions — USEPA Method 6 SOZ emissions were determined in accordance with 

### USEPA Method 

### 6. A sample was drawn from a single point in the gas stream at a constant rate and collected in a glass probe, and in a

Z: WPROJECAGIen-Gery Brick\06-046 IberialCompliance TeslinglReportlCompliance Reporl tlocC!



### series of glass impingers. The first impinger contained 80% isopropyl alcohol (IPA), and impingers 2 and 3 contained 3% hydrogen peroxide (HZOz). A 47 mm filter was inserted between impingers 1 and 2. A calibrated dry gas meter measured the gas sample volume which was at least 36 DSCF. Sample recovery procedures followed USEPA Method 6 guidelines and samples were analyzed using Ion Chromatography (IC) by Air Quality Services. 5.6. Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Emissions — USEPA Method 26A HF and HCl emissions were determined in accordance with USEPA Method 26A. A sample was withdrawn isokinetically from the gas stream and collected in a glass nozzle, probe, and on a heated, tared Teflon or quartz filter. The filter was connected to a series of four full-sized impingers. The first two impingers contained O.IN sulfuric acid the third impinger was empty and the fourth impinger contained a known quantity of silica gel. The impingers and connecting glassware were rinsed three times with deionized water which was combined with the impinger catch. The HF and HCI samples were analyzed by Ion Chromatography by Air Quality Services.
6. TESTING LOCATION The Tunnel Kiln Scrubber exhausts through a 130' high stack. Two 90° opposed sampling ports are located at a point meeting at least the minimum USEPA Method 1 criteria with the nearest upstream disturbance being a minimum of one-half diameter and the nearest downstream disturbance being at least 2 diameters away (Figure 5 of the Test Protocol, Appendix A). Twelve traverse points (6 per port) were utilized to establish gas flow rate for the 48" diameter exhaust 

### stack. The Shapes Kiln exhausts through a 25" duct which enters the tunnel Kiln scrubber exhaust aRer the control device (Figure 1 of the Test Protocol, Appendix A). Twent,y-four traverse points (12 per port) were utilized to establish gas flow rate for the 27" diameter exhaust stack (Figure 6 of the Test Protocol, Appendix A).

Z:W.PROIECTGIonrvGery 8rick106-0461berialCOmplianco TuslinB

~ ReportlCompllenw Report tloc

## E

7. DEVIATIONS FROM THE PROTOCOL Testing on the Tunnel Kiln Irilet was not completed because the sample port was inaccessible due to lack of clearance with the ceilir,g above the top test port. Sampling was attempted, but the leak check failed because the heated line from the end of the probe to the filter box became loose during testing due to the ceiling obstruction. The use of a single test port, reducing the number of sampling points, or altemate methodologies, was not approved by the OEPA. Therefore, process samples were collected and material balance calculations were performed to determine the inlet loading and system removal efficiency.
El Y 0&1111 `r!7 1

9 *10 * K`7 Tables 1 and 2 contain the PM, HCI, HF, and SOz testing results for the tunnel kiln exhaust, respectively. The Shapes Kiln exhaust PM, HCI, HF, and SOZ testing results are contained in Tables 3 and 4, respectively. Table 5 presents a summary of the material balance calculations. Field and computerized data sheets are contained in Appendix C. Laboratory data and equipment calibrations are contained in Appendices D and E, respectively. Sample calculations for each USEPA testing method for each testing location are contained in Appendix F. Supporting process data for the tunnel kiln material balances and Shapes Kiln emission estimates is included as Appendix O.
9. CONCLUSIONS A compliance testing program was performed Apri126, 2006 for the Glen-Gery Corporation at their Iberia, Ohio facility. Testing was performed on the Tunnel and Shapes Kiln outlets for particulate matter, hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, and sulfur dioxide. Testing was performed to demonstrate compliance with Title V renewal testing requirements and Permit to Install (PTI) requirements and to establish the site as a synthetic minor hazardous air pollutant (HAP) source.

Za4PROJECT1GIemGery Brick\B6

~ 0461barielCompliance TestlnBARepotllCompllence Report.doe

# ,. - 

# ;

•. 

# _ .Table I PM, HCI, and HF Test Results, Tunnel Kiln Outlet G1en Gery Corporation, lberia Plant, Iberia, Ohio
Test Parameters Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 26-Apr-06 26-Apr-06 26-Apr-06 Start Time 10:00 AM 12:53 PM 3:00 PM End Time 11:17 AM 1:56 PM 4:02 PM Flow Rate (ACFM) 35,889 38,439 37,489 37,273 Flow Rate (SCFM) 20,896 22,340 21,877 21,704 Flow Rate (DSCFM) 19,114 20,311 19,750 19,725 Sample Volume (DSCF) 39.947 41 190 40.212 40.450 Carbon Dioxide (CO,) (dry volume %) 6.00 600 6.00 6.00 Oxygen (O Z ) (dry volume %) 14.00 1400 14, 00 1400 Water Vapor (H 2 0) (volume %) 8,53 908 9,72 9.11 StackTempemture (°F) 4161 416.2 411.1 414A Percent of Isokinetic Sampling (%) 102.42 99.39 99.78 100.5 Results Particulate Matter (PM) Mass Collected (mg) 16.33 2543 37.10 2628 Emission Concentration (gr/DSCF) 0 006 0.010 0.014 0.010 Emission Rate (lb/hr) L 03 1.66 241 1 70 Emission Rate 1 (ton/yr) 453 7,26 1055 7.45 Hydrogen Chlor7de (HCI) Emission Mass (mg) 14.70 12.90 11.90 13.17 EmissionRate (Ib/hr) 0.93 0.84 0,77 0,85 Emission Rate 1 (ton/yr) 408 3,69 3,39 3 72 Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) Emission Mass (mg) 8.20 8.40 8.70 8.43 Emission Rate (lb/hr) 0.57 0,60 0.63 0.60 Emission Rate t (ton/yr) 2,49 264 2.74 2.62 Ton per year calculations are based on 8,760 hours of operation
ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute SCFM Standard cubic feet per minute DSCFM Dry standard cubic feet per minute DSCF Dry standard cubic feet °F Degrees Fahrenheit Ib/hr Pounds per Hour gr/DSCF Grains per dry standard cubic feet mg Milligrams % Percent

Za4PROdECT1GIen-GCry Br1ck106-046 Iberia\Compliance Testing\Tunnel Kiln Outiel\Methotl 526A Tunnel Kiln Outlet Iberia. Summary 5/1912006Table 2. Sulfur Dioxide Test Results, Tunnel Kiln Outlet Glen Gery Corpomtion, Iberia Plant, iberia, Ohio

Test Purnmeters Run I Run 2 Run 3 Average
Date 26-Apr-06 26-Aprrv06 26-Apr-06 Start Time 10:00 AM 12:53 PM 3:00 PM End Time 11:00 AM 1:53 PM 4:00 PM Flow Rate (ACFM) 35,889 38,439 37,489 37,273 Flow Rate (SCFM) 20,893 22,375 21,949 21,739 Flow Rate (DSCFM) 20,261 20,743 20,281 20,428 SampleVolume (DSCF) 41.412 42445 41.400 41752 Carbon Dioxide (CO,) (dry volume %) 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 Oxygen (O,) (dry volume %) 14.00 1400 14.00 1400 Water Vapor (H2O) (volume %) 3.03 729 7.60 5.97 Stack Temperature ("F) 41608 416.17 41108 414.44 Results Sulfur Dioxide (SO y ) Results Mass Collected (mg) 4732 508,0 421.0 4674 Emission Rate (Ib/hr) 30.62 3284 2728 30.25 Emission Rate (ton/yr) 134.1 143.8 119.5 132.5 ' Tons per year calculations based on 8,760 hours of operation % Percent ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute SCFM Standard cubic feet per minute DSCFM Dry standard cubic feet per minute DSCF Dry standard cubic feet °F Degrees Fahrenheit Ib/hr Pounds per hour mg Milligrams

ZIWPROJECT\Glen-Getyatick\66-e461bena\CompliancnTesling\TunnelKilnON@WdelhodBTUnneIKIInOWeL Snmmary 51192oo4Table 3. PM, HCI, and HF Test Results, Shapes Kiln Outlet Glen Gery Corporation, Iberia Plant, Iberia, Ohio
Test Parameters Run 1 Run 2 Run :3 Average
Date 4/26/2006 4/26/2006 4/26/2006 Start Time ] 0:00 AM 12:53 PM 3:00 PM E.nd Time 11:47 AM 1:56 PM 4:02 PM Flow Rate (ACFM) 5,885 5,387 5,480 5,584 FlowRate (SCFM) 4,469 3,982 4,025 4,159 F1owRate (DSCFM) 4,453 3,903 3,989 4,115 SampleVolume (DSCF) 47.195 43344 43.280 44606 Carbon Dioxide (CO Z ) (dry volume %) 0.00 0.00 0,00 000 Oxygen (O,) (dry volume %) 21,00 21,00 21,00 21.00 Water Vapor (H 2 0) (volume %) 0.35 1.99 0.87 1.07 Stack Temperature (°F) 2180 2366 239.8 231.5 Percent of Isokinetic Sampling (%) 96.70 101.35 9900 99.0 Results Particulate Matter (PM) Mass Collected (mg) 4,86 8 16 7.39 6.80 Emission Concentration (gr/DSCF) 0.002 0 003 0 003 0 002 Emission Rate (Ib/hr) 11061 0 097 0 090 0,083 Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Emission Mass (mg) 6,90 340 2.10 4.13 Emission Rate (lb/hr) 009 004 003 005 Hydrofluoric Acid (HF) Emission Mass (mg) 21 40 30.90 1880 20.10 E.mission Rate (lb/hr) 0.27 038 0.23 0.29
ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute SCFM Standard cubic feet per minute DSCFM Dry standard cubic feet per minute DSCF Dry standard cubic feet °F Degrees Fahrenheit Ib/hr Pounds per I-tour gr/DSCF Graitis per dty standard cubic feet mg Milligrams % Percent

Z:W,PRO.lECTlGIen-Geiy Bric1606-04616erialCompiiance Tesling\Shapes Kiln Outle11tv7ethod 5.26A Shapes Kiln Oullet. Summary 6R12006Table 4 Sulfur Dioxide Test Results, Shapes Kiln Outlet Glen Gery Corporation, Iberia Plant, Iberia, Ohio

Test Parameters Run I Run 2 Run 3 Average Date 26-Apr-06 26-Apr-06 26-Apr-06 Start Time ] 0:02 AM 12:54 PM 3:02 PM End Time 11:02 AM 1:54 PM 4:02 PM Flow Rate (ACFM) 5,885 5,387 5,480 5,584 FlowRate (SCFM) 4,480 3,987 4,022 4,163 Flow Rate (DSCFM) 4,387 3,901 3,979 4,089 Sample Volume (DSCF) 42 568 42,099 41 761 42 143 Carbon Dioxide (CO,) (dry volume %) 000 000 000 000 Oxygen (O,) (dry volume %) 21 ,00 21 .00 21 ,00 21.00 Water Vapor (H 2 0) (volume %) 2.08 2.16 1,07 1 77 StackTemperature (°F) 21633 235.75 24033 230.81 Results Sulfur Dioxide (SO Z ) Results MassCollected (mg) 43,1 106.9 523 67,4 Emission Rate (1b/hr) 0.59 1 31 066 0.85
% Percent ACFM Actual cubic feet per minute SCFM Standard cubic feet per minute DSCFM Dry standard cubic feet per minute DSCF Dry standard cubic feet °F Degrees Fahrenheit 1b/hr Pounds per hour mg Milligrams

ZY+PROIECTGIen-Gery Brick106-e46 Ibena\Compliance Testing\Shapes Kiln OutletWethod 8 Shapes Kiln Outlet. Summary 6

~ J20U6

### Table 5. Stack Test Calculations, Apri126, 2006

rlen Gery Iberia, Ohio

Tunnel Kiln Process Data Push Rate # Bricks per Car Weight of 1 Brick Process Rate Process Rate

Mass Balance Results Car Number MB 1-59 Car Number MB 8-59 Car Number MB 15-59 Average Inlet Emissions Rate Cars/day 23 Bricks/Car 9,360 Ib 3.8 lb Brick/hr 34,086 tons Brick/hr 17.04
HF HCI SO Z ]b HF / 

### ton fired clay 0.22 0.07 1,905 lb HF / 

### ton fired clay 0.36 0.03 2.011 lb HF / 

### ton fired clay 0.24 0.11 1,799 lb HF / 

### ton fired clay 0.27 0-07 1,91 Ib HF/hr 4.66 1-19 32,47

Stack Test Results Tunnel Kiln (includes Shapes) lb HF /hr 0.6 0.85 29.93 Shapes Kiln Ib HF /hr 030 0.05 0,084 Outlet Emissions Rate ]b HF /hr 0.30 0.80 29,85
Control Efficiency % 

### 93,6 32.9 N

Z:\APROJECIIGIen-Gery Brick\06-046lberia\Comptiance Testing\Shapes Kiln Outlet\Method 8 Shapes Kiln Outlet Table 5 612/2006

# APPENDIX A

'

~ 

### ; ;•: ~ ~ 

### 'f;

### TUNNEL KILN SCRUSBER and S)EIAPES KILN E1{T3AUST COMPLIANCE TEST PROTOCOL GLEN-GERY CORPORATION IBERIA, OHIO
March 2006

Prepared for: Mr. .lerry Carrier Glen-Gery Corporation 423 S. Pottsville Pike, Box 340 Shoemakersville, Pennsylvania 19555

Prepared by: Air/Compliance Consultants, Inc. 1050 William Pitt Way Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania 15238 412-826-3636 Project Nmnber: 06-046

r' 1 I l i

### TUNNEL I(H,N SCRTJSBER and SIiAPES IOLN EXHATJST COMPLIANCE TEST PROTOCOI, GLEN-GERY CORPORATION M ia blS
ff u ~~ _ ... 11 ?

A.IR/CON1P'L7ANCE CONSULTtlNTS, IIVC. 

# J afvv az~ T 

# - ak.0 9-v

~ 

# ' James E. Phillippi 

# ~ Senioi Project Manager


# 1 0/ Robert N. Frey Vice President

### TABLE OF CONTENTS Paae



### I COMPANY AND TESTING FIRM INFORMATION.... ........__ 

# . ..... ._ 2. TESTING LOCATION ..
.......... 

# . _,. ..... 

# _ 

# _.. . i 3 ANALYTICAL LABORATORY INFORMATION-.. .. ..... .._ 

# - _ . .. ..........._ 

# , . .... .1 4. RELEVANT OEPA CORRESPONDENCE.._ .... 

# . ... ......... .:. .:....... ... ......... ...__ 2 5 OBTECTIVES OF TESTING PROGRAM.... 

# - _ _ . 

# .. .. _. . 

# ._. _ _.. ..-...... 

# _ 

# .. _., ,2 6 SOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ANY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES --.2 7 SIMPLE BLOCK. DIAGRAM .... 

# _ _ ..... .. .. 

# . ........ 

# _ 

# .. . 

# ., _ 

# _.. 3 8. PROCESS OPERATING CONDiTIONS 

# _ 

# _.. . _ . 3 9 PROCESS PARAMETERS. 

# ._ _ , ... .. __._ 

# . . . . . . _.._... 

# . ... 

# _ . ... .. 

# . . .. ...- .3 10 TEST METHODS SUMMARY. 

# __ - _ 

# _. . _ 

# _._. .. . . . ........ 

# . . 4 11. SAMPLE COLLHCTION AND RECOVERY..... .._-.. ._ __..,_. .... ....:..__ ................. 4 11 TESTING LOCATION 

# .. ._ _...._6 13 SAMPLE HANDLING PROCEDURES 

# . _ , .. _.__.. .. 

# . 

# _.., _ ... 

# . . 

# ._ _ ... 7 14 FORMULAS TO BE USED IN DATA REDUCTION ...... .. .. ..... 

# . ...._... .... 

# _ . -

.,. 

# 7 15, EXAMPLES OF FIELD DATA SHEETS 

# , .. . . ....... ..,. . .. ... . . _.. _... ._..__ _. . .7 16. TESTINGSCHEDULE- 

# _.. ._ __......_ ._...... .... ...8 

# 17. REPORTING 

# . . .. __... . _.- .. ..... _ . ... . . 8
FIGUI2ES 

### 1. Process Flow Diagram 2 USEPA MeUiod 5/26A Sampling Tiain Schematic 3, USEPA Metbod 6 Sampling Train Schematic 4.. Tunnel Kiln Scrubber Inlet Sampling Port Diagrarn 5 Tunnel ICiln Scrubber Outlet Sanipling Port Diagram 6 Sbapes Kiln Exhaust Duct Diagram APPENDICES 

### A OEPA Intent to Test Fonns B Sample Calculations C- Sainple Data SheetsTUNNEL IQLN SCRUBBER and SIIAPES IOLN EXI3AUST COMPLIANCE TEST PROTOCOL GLEN-GERY CORPORATION IBERIA, OHIO
1. COMPANY AND TESTING FIRM INFORMATION COMPANY CONTACT TESTING CONTACT Mr. Teny Carrier Glen-Gery Corporation 423 S. Pottsville Pilce Shoemalcersville, Pennsylvania (610) 698-4627 — Telephone (610) 562-2084 — Facsimile jcarTier@gle.ngerybricic.com Mr. James E Phillippi Air/Compliance Consultants, Inc. 1050 William Pitt Way 19555 Pittsburgh,Pennsylvania 15238

(412) 826-3636 — Telephone (412) 826-3640 — Facsimile jphill@air-comp com
2. TESTING LOCATION Glen-Gery Corporation Iberia Plant P O. Box 207 — County Line Rd_ 9 Iberia, Oliio 43325-0208 (419) 468-5002 - Telephone 3. ANALYTICAL LABORATORY INFORMATION Hydrogen fluoiide (HF) and hydrogen chloride (HCl) analysis wi11 be completed by: Ms NancyM Kotsko Air Quality $ervices 4527 Clairton Blvd Pittsburgh, PA 15236 (412) 881-5630 — Telephone PA Laboratory Registration No, 02-711 Particulate matter (PM) analysis will be completed by: Mr James E Phillippi Air Compliance Consultants, Inc. 1050 William Pitt Way Pittsburgh,PA 15238 (412) 826-3636 — Telephone PA Laboratory Registration No. 02-7422

4. RELEVANT OEPA CORRESPONDENCE Appendix A contains the Intent to Test forms for tlre Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA).
5. OBJECTIVES OF TESTING PROGRAM Testing is being conducted to determine compliance witli I-IF, PM, and sulfur dioxide (SOz) emission limits and removal efficiency forHF as described below:

_ Tunnel I{iln (P008) Shapes Kiln (POI1) Pollutaut Inlet to Scrubbert' 1 Outlet from Scrubber ( 

### ' ) In duct prior to stacict' 1 HF Title V and PTI PTI PTI & Title V HCl PTI PTI SOZ Title V Titie V PM Title V Title V PTI - Pernzit to hrstall Notes:
t ]) Emissions from the Tunnel I{iln (P008) measured prior to mixing with emissions from the Shapes Kiln. (Z) Emissions from the Shapes I<iln (P011) measured prior to mixing with emissions fiom the Tunnel Kiln Testing is being completed to establisli the site as a syntlietic minor hazardous air pollutant (I-IAP) source, to meet PTI requirements, and to meet Title V renewal testing requirements
6. SOURCE DESCRIPTION AND ANY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DEVICES Glen-Gery Corporation (Glen-Gery) owns and operates a bricic manufacturing plant in Marion County, Ohio. This plant produces a variety of brick products in both residential and commercial sizes and with a full range of product colors, from traditional red bricic to gray/wlrite buff-colored bricic

AServerllapro)edlGlervGCry BrickW6A461berin Swbber CampliancelPmlocolW evi5ed Prolornl vnlh PA1 antl S02doc3

The Iberia operation uses seven tunnel dryers, one tunnel kiln, and one shuttle kiln to produce the final products. The cars can-ying green brick move on tracks tluough the dryers and I<ilns, Natural gas is the only fuel used to fire the kilns and dryers. The tunnel kiln is equipped with a dry limestone adsorber (DLA) to control HF emissions prior to venting to the atmospliere The DLA unit is Hellmich Model No FICA 594/350-CT- A top-mounted silo stores approximately 30 cubic meters of crushed limestone granules. The DLA is comprised of a limestone cascade tower with a top mounted limestone feed section. Crushed limestone will be delivered to the site via truck and distributed to the tower bin pneumatically. The crushed limestone will trickle vertically from the top mounted storage section and pass through horizontal cascades located in the reaction chamber sections of the tower, The DLA is fnrther descr'ibed in the corresponding 2006 Permit-To-Install (PTI) establishing synthetic minor HAP limits for the plant.
7. SIMPLE BLOCK DIAGRAMFigrue I provides a simple block diagram8: PROCESS OPERATING CONDITIONS Testing will take place during periods of maximum production.
9. PROCESS PARAMETERS Glen-Gery personnel will be responsible for recording the following process parameters during the testing period: • IGIn 8uoughput (tons frred brick/hour); • Type of brick in lciln during testing; • Pressure drop across the DLA; and • Limestone feed rate.

1i5erveriUplojecllGlervGCry Btick1U6 046 ibedx Swbber CampllanceNlol000llRevised Pmioml vrilh PM and 502 CocIII



### 10. TEST METHODS SUMMARY 1'esting will be conducted following the United States Environmental Protection Agency's (USL•PA), Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Part 60, Appendix A Testing Methods.. The following is a summary table listing testing methods for the program:
USEPA Method 1 "Sample and Velocity Traverses for Stationary Sources" USEPA Method 2 "Determination of Stacic Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate (Type S Pitot Tube)" USEPA Metliod 3 "Gas Analysis for Carbon Dioxide, Oxygen, Excess Air, and Dry Moleeular Weight" USEPA Method 4 "Determination ofMoisture Content in Stacic Gasses" USEPA Method 5 "Determination of Particulate Matter from Stationary Sources" i7SEPA Method 6 "Determination of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions from Stationary Sources" USEPA Method 26A "Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions from Stationary
. Sources, lsokinetic Method"
11. SAMPLE COLLECTION AND RECOVERY 11.1. Traverse Point Selection — USEPA Method 1 USEPA Method 1 will be followed for the determinations of traverse point selection 11.2. Stacic Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate — USEPA Method 2 USEPA Metliod 2 will be followed for the detennination of gas velocity and volumetric flow rate. This procedure utilizes an S-type Pitot tube and inclined manometer to determine stacic-gas velocity head. Gas temperature measurements will be made using a Type K thermocouple and digital pyrometer.

\15erver1\iproject\GICm Gery 8r16N6-0461Cedn Snubber CompilancelProlomllRevLetl Pmlomi vdlh PM and 502 tloc9

11.3. Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide Emissions — USEPA Metbod 3 Carbon dioxide (COZ), oxygen (02), and stacic-gas molecular weiglit will be analyzed and obtained in accordance with USEPA Method 3. Fyrite gas analyzers will be used in the sampling Three grab samples will be talcen during each test run. Nitrogen (Nz) will be detemuned by the difference. 11,4. Determination of Moisture Content in Stacic Gases — USEPA Method 4 The flue gas moisture eontent at the stacic will be determined in aecordance with USEPA Method 4 The gas moisture will be determined by quantitatively condensing stacic gas in chilled impingers and a silica gel absorber The amount of moisture condensed will be deternuned by the volume of condensate collected in the impingers and silica gel. A dry gas meter will be used to measure the volume of gas sampled The amount of water condensed and the volume of gas sampled will be used to calculate the gas nioisture content Moisture determination will be performed on each test run to allow determination of dry stacic-gas molecular weight and to calculate the dry standar'd cubic feet per minute (DSCFM) flow rate The moistur'e train sampling will be combined with the iJSEPA Method 5/26A, and 6 sampling. 11.5. Particulate Matter Emissions — USEPA Method 5 PM emissions wi11 be detemiined in accordance witlr USEPA Method 5.. A sample will be drawn isolcinetically from the gas stream and collected in a glass nozzle, probe, and on a heated, tared Teflon or quartz flter A series of glass impingers will be used to collect moisture. A calibrated dry gas meter will measure the gas sample volume which will be at least 36 dry standard cubic feet (DSCF) Sample recovery procedures will follow USEPA Metlrod 5 guidelines and samples will be analyzed by ACCI_ This sampling train will be combined with the USEPA Method 26A sampling train.. Figure 2 eontains a diagram of the USEPA Metliod 5/26A train. 11.6. Sulfur Dioxide Emissions — USEPA Method 6 S02 emissions will be determined in accordance witli USEPA Method 6 A sample will be dr'awn fronr a single point in the gas stream at a constant rate of approximately 0 75 cubic feet per mir7ute (CFM), and collected in a glass probe, and in a series of glass impingers. The first

\\Servert ~ ipm
~ ecltGlen-Gery Mch\66-0A6lbeflo Scmbber CortqllancelPmloml\Revisetl Pmloml vAh Pht ontl 502 tloc

### E.

impinger will contain 80% isopropyl alcohol (IPA), and impingers 2 and 3 will contain 3% hydrogen peroxide (HzOZ). A glass wool plug or equivalent will be inserted between impingers 1 and 2. A calibrated dry gas ineter will measure the gas sample volume wlriclr will be at least .36 DSCF Sample recovery procedures will follow USEPA Method 6 guidelines and samples wi11 be analyzed using Ion Cliromatography (IC) by Air Quality Services., Figure 3 is a Method 6 sarnpling train schematic 11.7. Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Emissions - USEPA 1Vlethod 26A I

- ]F and HCl eniissions will be detennined in accordance with USEPA Method 26A A san<ple will be withdrawn isolcinetically from the gas stream and collected in a glass nozzle, probe, and on a heated, tared Teflon or quartz filter. The filter will be connected to a series of four full sized impingers. The first two impingers will contain O IN sulfuric acid the third impinger will be empty and the fourtlr impinger will contain a Icnown quantity of silica gel. The impingers and connecting glassware will be rinsed three times with deionized water which will be combined with the impinger catch. The HF and HCI samples will be analyzed by Ion Cliromatography by Air Quality Serviees 12, TESTING LOCATION The Tunnel IGIn Scntbber inlet testing location contains two 90° opposed sampling ports The inlet duct is 48" in diameter and the nearest downstream disturbance is approximately 025 diameters away, and the nearest upstream disturbance is approximately 175 diameters away These test ports do not ineet the required dimensions in USEPA Method l Cyclonic flow checics will be made prior to testing and the maximum of twenty-forir tiaverse points (12 per diameter) will be u6lized on the scmbber inlet testing location Figure 4 shows a diagram of the Tunnel ICiln Scrubber Inlet sampling ports. The Twmel ICiln Scrubber exhausts tlirough a 130' stacl< Two 90° opposed sainpling ports are located at a point meeting at least the minimum USEPA Method I criteria witl7 the nearest upstream dislurbance being a minimum of one-half diameter and the nearest downstream disthtrbance being at least 2 diaineters away.. It is assuined that 12 traverse points (6 per port) will

t1,Serverl

~ projecBGlem GCry BdckmB-04e Iberio Snubber Ca
~ liancelPmlocoMeNSed Pmlornl w1th PA1 ontl 502 doc7

be utilized to establish gas flow rate for the 48" diameter exhaust stacic Figure 5 shows a diagram of the Tunnel ICiln Outlet sampling ports. The Sliapes ICiln exhausts through a 25" duct which enters the tunnel Kiln scrubber exliaust after the control device. Figure 6 shows a diagram of the Shapes ICiln Exlraust. All dimensions will be verified in the field and sampling points selected according to USEPA Method I . Sample Point Information: USEPA Points Minutes Total Location Constituent Method Per Port Per Point Minutes (minimum) Tunnel Kiln I

- IF PM, S02 1-5, 6, 26A 6 2.5 60 Scrubber Outlet Tunnel ICiln HCI, HF 1-4, 26A 12 2.5 60 ScrubberInlet Shapes ICiln BF, S02 1-5, 6, 26A 6 2.5 60



### Hi 1.3. SAMPLE HANDLING PILOC);DURES All sample recovery and handling procedures will follow the respective USEPA Method guidelines Chain of Custody Forms will be completed and accompany samples to the laboratory
14. FORMULAS TO BE USED IN DATA REDUCTION See Appendix B. 15. EXAMPLES OF FIELD DATA SHEETS See Appendix C

t1Scrvm9apro)etllGlem Gery Grirhl0&04610etlx swbbet CompiioncelProlomilFevlseJ Pmloml vAlh P!d anE S02Aoe

## e

16. TESTING SCHEDIJLR Testing has tentatively been scheduled for March 2006.. Testing will be scheduled in accordance with the construction petmit. The OEPA is being notified a minimum of 30 days prior to the testing date.
17. REPORTING At the conclusion of the compliance testing program, a test report summarizing the findings of ihe emission test program will be prepared in accordance with USEPA and OEPA requirements Included in the report will be a sampling procedure description, individuals present during the test program, removal efficiency for I3P, and emission rates for HF, HCI, PM, and S02 from both the tumiel lciln (P008) and shuttle kiln (P011) . The report will also contain all field data sheets, calibration slieets, laboratory analysis, and supporting sample calculations The final report will be submitted within 45 days after the testing is completed.

\15erver1lopiojecirGlerr GCry 0dck1060461betla 6cmbber CompiixncelProlocoN2evised Prolocol Mib P1d antl 502 tloc~ ~~ E ~ "~ 

# I {

~~ 

# € _"

~ ~, 

# t {

~ 

# S 't,_

~ 

# . [~ ~

~ 

### C p bD

~ w
~ N ~

4 g ~ ~

a 

## .n 6 5



## = Q Q ~ 

### .. C D ~ eJ m 

### o`u
Qw ~ m

~ a

~ tz rn

~x ~ S+ N (/ ~ R

U O rn O

m

~ D Uj

~ u n
Cr 

### ~ - 2

~ ~

~ i

~ ~ H M 

### ^_ u J O
~ O 

# ~ ~ ~ 

# z ~

~ ~

~ U 

# a G:1 U 

# z a ca

v =

~ u+

~ c c 6 

# °
V ~ ` N di V 

# M

11- 01;- - ~

~ N 

# _m W i3 ? W W 

# z>
m m ~ c~~ W ~ _-
. UC 

# mE F

~ a '

EW 

# M = ~

a 7 a o

~ 1 a

UWW Wm C

oti o v o m N— Y ~ yO ❑ ~ N~ EN m

~ W

v ~I g — ~) o ' N ~ 

# m E °

N UO^ W ~ O

~ 

### S V a ° v ~~5 

# wdm

~
@ 3 11. ~ ° o N P N av

a `m N ~ ~ L ~ M 2



## z 

# ~ F U 

## z

~ 

### a a

~ ¢ m ¢ ~ N
~ Q 0 

### x F U ~ d a. f ~t ~ D



## O , ~ N C. G 

## V
~ ~ ~ C 4 V ° 

# h 

# ] g l 

# s N 

# A ;v l,a.

~ ..

### a_c 0 0 c. w 

# o~

~ ~ p U w N

d ~ 7

~ zq OI o) ~ 0 0
~ ~ ~

0 3

a`

Cl V 

### ° u

v p 

## ~ u 

### [a

~ u a 

## aa — w

~ ¢ 0 rn u E U U O 5 I+ U 

### a U

.~ ❑ t~ Q



### y u U 

## ~ wzA ~ L
n



### r,

N

o 

## ~ ~ z e T s e t a 9 0 4 L L z L
0 

## 0

~ ~ m i-i 

# z

~



### ~ O
~ 

### O 

## U

~ G'a C7 

# z a

~



### V C 

### O " - N
V = ~ y r 0 <t vQ 

# I '= I

~ ~ C 4

O D\ G E c U i u

h U V 7 

### wz ❑

~ 

# rl p 

# ~ H CJ ~ v~ 

## z 

## H H

~ 

# z 0 

# U U



# ~ 111 ~~~ 111 

### 0 L`

~ r \ H



### ~
~ 

## E 

## A

~ A

~

F

~ M 

# ~ T

° W U C

a ~ Q O e

~ U V ~ w z O

p l O 4 ~ 0

~ ~ 

### ~ a 

### ~
~

~ 

# ~ 0
~ 0 U a

~ M

~ 

### c

u ~ P~.

~ u C u

~ 0 `u 

### ~

~ ~ ~ a ~ 

# O
o ~ 

## ~ 

# a 

# ii
m ei 

# a c a w ~ 

# 4 7 ~ bD W

V C: C ~ 6 y~

~ d v ° 

# w Fo- Q 

# a

~ x

## QI'Q I

~ a 

# c rn b D V ~

~ V

~ y _C ~ ~ U wzca ~ 

## U
~ v.i

~ 

## ~ 

# Z O 

# U V 

# ~

~ 

### O
~

~ i

~ 

## I H

^ r^ VJ 

# H G r, A O ~

~

~ F~ 

## 10

0 ~+ q U a ~ ~

~ o F 

## O Q Q L U !J U wz f

~ 

## NI p

~ 

## l ~
~ 0

M
O


## ~ O
~ O 

### U 

# a V

~ C> 

## W F~ O ~ d0 2 bD 3 r

a`

~ a 0 .~

v 0 ~ 

### ~

V s w V
~

~ 

### a 

# c w 

# I

a e ~ ~ C 0 0 o, w



## W v Y ~ C ~

~ O Q ~ t v



# ~ - Q a

### ~~~ ~mg , 

# EUz: 111I

0 

# O ILt 

# E' 0,

o? E ~
12

z E
z z

> 

# H R:

L~ A

Ei 

### s

O E

z u

W , EXU Z E

' U x z 

### r 

# o A



### 2 

# 40 

# HE

aa¢X ~ n=D

S O

E

.

- g

A

Nc

- E

&X 7- 

## E h7

0 - E 

# OH a E

o. x 

## 6 

# F] LJ S

Z- 

## 1 m i 

## o 4 

## %E t; 

## E Z

21 

## s u

4 

## 1

Z 

## E E A

~ 4 ?S 6 oi O
LL

2: 

### ~~~~ m - Z~ Q =_ E
E --

SS

O E Ei

u oiHE FOLLOWINO ADDITIONAL INFOflMAT10N SHAL L. BE SUBMITTED AS ATRACIiMENTS:

F Samplc Train lnformation: I A schcmatic diagram ot each sampling train 2 The type or lypes of capture media to be used lo collect each gas slremn pollmonl ( Include frller specificalion shects) 3 Sample lubc lype. (c g., glass, icflon. stainless stcel, cic ) 4 Probe cleaning mclhod and solvent lo bc used, if applicable G LoboratoryAnulysis A descriplion of the laborntory nnulysis methods lo be used lo dclermine the wncenbation of cach pollutnnt H DcAcriplion of Operalion: A descriplion of ony opemlion, process or activily Ihat could vcnt exlraust gases to the Icsl slack This shall includc lhc descriplion and fecd rnte of nll materinis capable of pradueing pollutnnl emissions used in eoch seporale operptfon Notc 1: All Iesting shnil be performed al maximum rnle caPoeity ns specified by thc equipment manufaclurer or at the maximum

rnte actully used in lhe emissions unil operation, whichever is grcater. or at any rate speciGed by the ndminisuator Notc 2: If the emissions unit is nnt operated at maximum cnpacily, or as close as possible Ihercto, lhc cmissions unit might

bc dcralcd to lhot productinn copacily Notc 3: Produclion rccords nnd pammctric monitoring rccords must bc includcd in Oro fnal rcport Stnck nnd Vent Descriplion: A dimensional skcich or sketches showing thc plan and elevalion view of'the entire ducting and stack armngcmcnl The sketch should include thc rclative position of nl) processed or operations vcnling to the stack or vent to be tesled It should also includc Iltc posilion of ihe porls rclativc to thc ncnresl upsucam and downstrcam gas (low dislurbancc or ducl dimcnsional c6angc Thc skciches sllould include thc rclalive position.. type, and manufacturets clalmcd cfGciency of all gns cicnning equipment A cross scctional dimcnsional skctch of lhc stack or duct al the sampling pons. showing Ihc posilion of sampling points In case of a rectangulor ducl. shove division of ducl into equal nreas Safety: Describc all possible safety hulnrds ineluding such items as Ihe presence ofioxic fumes high noise Ievcls, mes where eyc prolcclfon is required. etc Noto: Conditions considered unsnfe n1 thc lime of Ihe test ivill cause postponemerrl Test Rcpon: The final test rcpon must contain, ns a minimum. Ihc following infonnatinn to be ncecpmble: All mw dala shccts. including slrip charts wbure npplicnblc Proccss dnm Rcsulls of audit samplcs Alllab analyses dnta All calibmtion datn Complcic chain-of-custody rccords for all samplcs rcmovcd from !he fzcility for recovcry and/or nnalysis All formulas used in calculating emission rntes if difrerent Ihnn specifred in the npplicable reference medrod An cxpinnalion of nll dismptions encountered during Ihe Icsl period. (i c. Meler box changes, process shntdowns. brokcn glasswarc. ctc ) Backholf anulysis if dcicrmining porticalatc cmissions thal arc 10 microns in aerodynamic diamcicr or Icss Notc: In accordancc wilh OAC 3745-15-04 Ihe mpon must bc submittcd within 30 days of conducting thc tcst L Test Postponcmcnt It is underslnndable ihnl a test tvill necd lo be postponed duc lo circumslances tbnt would not ollow representotive eondilions to bc e5tablishcd such ns recent maintcnance or modihcolion, equipmeni failure. or lhc absence of key personncl flowever. concern thal n Icst will result in a dctcnninotion of non-compliancc is not n valid renson for puslponcmcnt nnd n f:rcility dccision to posrpone wilhout a vnlid renson may result in enforcement action xgninst the facility OAIn F.P.I fnrm nArn7

RScrvcriWpmjccnGlcn-Gcry nri
~ 106=046 Ibnin Snublmr ComplionccNrotomllCapy of Imcnllu Tcn Fvrtn EAP Poge 2