North Dakota: 2010

Population and Housing Unit Counts

2010 Census of Population and Housing

Issued June 2012

CPH-2-36

U.S. Department of Commerce

Economics and Statistics Administration

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU

census.gov

U.S. Department of Commerce

Rebecca M. Blank, 

Acting Secretary

Rebecca M. Blank, 

Deputy Secretary

Economics and Statistics Administration 

Vacant, 

Under Secretary 

for Economic Affairs

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU 

Robert M. Groves, 

Director

North Dakota: 2010

Population and Housing Unit Counts

Issued June 2012

CPH-2-36
ECONOMICS

AND STATISTICS

ADMINISTRATION

SUGGESTED CITATION

U.S. Census Bureau, 

2010 Census of 

Population and Housing, 

Population and 

Housing Unit Counts,

CPH-2-36, North Dakota 

U.S. Government Printing Office, 

Washington, DC, 

2012

Economics 

and Statistics 

Administration

Vacant, 

Under Secretary for 

Economic Affairs

U.S. CENSUS BUREAU

Robert M. Groves,

Director

Thomas L. Mesenbourg, 

Deputy Director and 

Chief Operating Officer

Nancy A. Potok, 

Associate Director 

for Demographic Programs

Enrique J. Lamas, 

Chief, Population Division
Contents iii

List of Statistical Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v

How to Use This Census Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I-1

Table Finding Guide . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II-1

User Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . III-1

Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places: 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV-1

Statistical Tables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Appendixes

A Geographic Terms and Concepts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *

B Definitions of Subject Characteristics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *

C Data Collection and Processing Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *

D Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *

E Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . E-1

F Operational Overview and Accuracy of the Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . *

G Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census 

 of the United States . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *

H Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . *

*Appendix may be found in the separate volume, CPH-2-A, Population and Housing 

Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, in print and on the Internet at <www.census.gov

/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>.

CONTENTS

List of Statistical Tables v

Table 

no. Title Page

1. Population: Earliest Census to 2010; and Housing Units: 

1950 to 2010 ..................................... 1

 State, Urban and Rural

2. Population, Housing Units, and Land Area by Urban and 

Rural and Size of Urban Area: 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

 State, Urban and Rural, Size of Urban Area [Population]

3. Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010 ... 4

 State, Size of Place [Population]

4. Population and Housing Units: 1970 to 2010 ............ 6

 State, County/County Equivalent

5. Population, Housing Units, Land Area, and Density: 2010; 

and Percent Change: 1980 to 2010 .................... 7

 State, County/County Equivalent

6. Rank of Counties by Percent Change in Population: 

2000 to 2010 ...................................... 8

 County/County Equivalent

7. Population by Urban and Rural: 2010 .................. 9

 State, County/County Equivalent

8. Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area 

Measurements and Density: 2010 .................... 10

 State, County/County Equivalent, County Subdivision, Place

9. Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area 

Measurements and Density: 2010 .................... 40

 State, Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

10. Rank by 2010 Population and Housing Units: 

2000 and 2010 .................................... 52

 Place [2,500 or More Population]

11. Rank of Places by Percent Change in Population: 

2000 to 2010 ...................................... 53

 Place [2,500 or More Population]

12. Population and Housing Units for Urban Areas: 2010 ..... 54

 State, Urbanized Area, Urban Cluster

LIST Of 

STATISTICAL 

TAbLES

How to Use This Census Report I-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

How to Use This Census Report

CONTENTS

Page

Introduction .................................................................. I-1

How to Find Geographic Areas and Subject Matter Data ................................. I-2

How to Use the Statistical Tables ................................................... I-2

Graphics ..................................................................... I-5

User Notes ................................................................... I-5

Appendixes .................................................................. I-5

INTRODUCTION

Data from the 2010 Census for the United States and Puerto Rico are presented in two printed report series 

and a single report for American Indians and Alaska Natives by tribe:

1. CPH-1, Summary Population and Housing Characteristics

2. CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts

3. CPH-3, Characteristics of American Indians and Alaska Natives by Tribe 

The data from the 2010 Census were derived from a limited number of basic questions asked of the entire 

population and about every housing unit. Appendix D (see Selected Appendixes report at <www.census 

.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>) presents a facsimile of the questionnaire pages used to collect the data 

included in this report. Note that the “long form” data included in previous censuses are not included in 

the 2010 Census. 

The CPH-1, Summary Population and Housing Characteristics, report series provides data based on age, 

Hispanic or Latino origin, household relationship, race, sex, tenure (owner- or renter-occupied), and 

vacancy characteristics. Land area measurements and population density also are provided. This series is 

similar to the Census 2000 PHC-1 series. 

The CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts, report series provides 2010 Census and historical comparisons of the population and housing unit counts. It also provides area measurements and density. The 

user notes section documents geographic changes over the past decade. This series is similar to the 

Census 2000 PHC-3 series. 

In each series, there is one report for each state, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico, plus a United 

States summary report. Many tables in the United States summary reports include data for Puerto Rico. 

The CPH-3, Characteristics of American Indians and Alaska Natives by Tribe, report provides population 

and housing information for selected American Indian and Alaska Native tribes. This report is similar to the 

Census 2000 PHC-5 report. This is a single report covering the entire United States. 
I-2 How to Use This Census Report

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

HOW TO FIND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS AND SUBJECT MATTER DATA

This report includes a table finding guide to assist the user in locating those statistical tables that contain 

the desired data. The table finding guide lists alphabetically, by geographic area, the subjects shown in 

this report. To determine which tables in this report show data for a particular topic, find the subject in the 

left-hand column of the table finding guide and then look across the columns using the headings at the top 

for the desired type of geographic area. Figure I-1 is an example of a table finding guide. 

The table finding guide does not include cross-classification of subject-matter items. Additional information to locate data within specific reports is provided in the headnote at the top of the table finding guide 

and in the footnotes at the bottom of the guide. 

Figure I-1.

Geographic area

Population Housing units Area 

measurement

Average per square 

mile of land (density)

Number of 

 2010 Census places

Previous 

censuses

Change 

from 

previous 

census 2010 Census

Previous 

censuses

Change 

from 

previous 

census Total area Land area Population

Housing 

units

THE STATE1 

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 1,2,4,5,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 8,9 2,5,8,9 5,8,9 5,8,9 1,3 Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 – – 3 Current urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 – – – 1950–90 urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 – – – – – Urban and rural by size of place . . . . . . . 3 – – – – – – – – – 3 In urbanized area and in urban cluster . . 2,7,12 – – 2,12 – – – 2 – – – Size of urban area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 – – 2 – – – 2 – – – In place and not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,7 – – – – – – – – – 3

COUNTY2

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,5,6,8 4,6,8 5,6 4,8 4,8 5 8 5,8 5,8 5,8 – Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 – – – – – – – – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6 6 – – – – – – – –

COUNTY SUBDIVISION3

By county . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 8 8 – Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 – By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10a 10a – 10a 10a – – – – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11a 11a 11a – – – – – – – –

PLACE

By county and county subdivision . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 8 8 – Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 – By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 10 – 10 10 – – – – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 11 11 – – – – – – – –

URBAN AREA

Urbanized area and urban cluster . . . . . . 12 – 12 – – – – – – – –

1

 State, District of Columbia, or Puerto Rico .

2

 Parish in Louisiana; city and borough, municipality, borough, or census area in Alaska; and municipio in Puerto Rico; in Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia, one or more cities 

are independent of counties and are treated as statistical equivalents of counties; the entire District of Columbia, which has no counties, is treated as a county equivalent . 3

 County subdivisions within the state are shown alphabetically with places for the following 12 states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, 

New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin .

Table Finding Guide

SUBJECTS BY TYPE OF GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND TABLE NUMBER

The types of geographic areas covered in this report are shown on the side, and subjects are shown at the top. See CPH-2-A, Population and 

Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes (<www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>), for a description of area classifications (Appendix A) 

and for definitions and explanations of subject characteristics (Appendix B).

Table Finding Guide II-1U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

HOW TO USE THE STATISTICAL TABLES

Parts of a Statistical Table

The census data included in printed reports are arranged in tables. Each table includes four major parts: (1) 

heading, (2) boxhead, (3) stub, and (4) data field. A typical census report table is illustrated in Figure I-2.

The heading consists of the table number, title, and headnote. The table number indicates the position of 

the table within the report, while the title is a brief statement indicating the subjects and time reference 

of the data presented in the table. The headnote is enclosed in brackets and is located under the title. It 

contains statements that qualify, explain, or provide information pertaining to the entire table. 
How to Use This Census Report I-3

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

The boxhead is under the heading. This portion of the table, which contains the individual column heads 

or captions, describes the data in each vertical column. In the boxhead of many tables, a spanner appears 

across and above two or more column heads or across two or more lower spanners. The purpose of a 

spanner is to classify or qualify items below it or separate the table into identifiable blocks in terms of 

major aspects of the data. 

The stub is located at the left edge of the table. It includes a listing of line or row captions or descriptions. 

At the top of the stub is the stubhead. The stubhead is considered to be an extension of the table title and 

usually shows generic geographic area designations and restrictions. 

Race in combination with one or more other races Race alone or in combination with one or more other races

Asian

Native

Hawaiian

and Other

Pacic

Islander

American

Indian

and

Alaska

Native

Some

Other Race

Black or

African

White American White

Black or

African

American

American

Indian

and

Alaska

Native Asian

Native

Hawaiian

and Other

Pacic

Islander

Some

Other Race

Table 6.

[For information on condentiality protection, nonsampling error, and denitions, see Selected Appendixes at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-1-a.pdf>]

Population for Selected Categories of Race: 2010

State

County

Place

 Delaware......................................................... 18,775 14,109 5,718 5,152 816 5,026 637,392 205,923 9,899 33,701 1,216 35,545

COUNTY

 Kent County......................................................... 4,523 3,595 1,558 1,215 215 838 114,522 42,508 2,601 4,521 306 4,073

 New Castle County............................................ 10,502 7,949 2,895 3,333 409 3,171 363,457 135,735 4,469 26,633 568 22,286

 Sussex County..................................................... 3,750 2,565 1,265 604 192 1,017 159,413 27,680 2,829 2,547 342 9,186

PLACE

 Arden village, New Castle County................. 3 1 12 0 1 428 6 3 3 0 3

 Ardencroft village, New Castle County.......... 1 0 01 0 0 199 21 0 0 12 0

 Ardentown village, New Castle County......... 8 2 05 0 2 256 4 1 0 0 1 2

 Bear CDP, New Castle County........................ 522 447 149 132 11 201 10,298 7,129 211 944 16 1,527

 Bellefonte town, New Castle County............. 13 5 25 2 7 1,096 80 4 3 19 9

 Bethany Beach town, Sussex County........... 5 3 11 0 0 1,054 5 5 1 0 0

 Bethel town, Sussex County........................... 2 2 00 0 0 164 8 1 0 0 0

 Blades town, Sussex County............................ 45 46 6 0 3 7 802 391 15 10 3 74

 Bowers town, Kent County............................. 3 1 11 0 1 318 7 5 4 0 5

 Bridgeville town, Sussex County................... 62 51 16 8 5 12 1,391 545 19 14 7 152

 Brookside CDP, New Castle County............. 445 325 118 80 35 125 10,218 3,070 172 529 37 912

 Camden town, Kent County............................ 124 104 49 52 0 13 2,413 920 60 180 1 63

 Cheswold town, Kent County........................ 50 32 32 12 10 13 793 497 68 46 10 47

 Claymont CDP, New Castle County.............. 149 112 34 32 5 25 5,435 2,344 62 347 14 240

 Clayton town........................................................ 73 73 21 16 1 13 2,105 791 27 33 1 63

 Kent County (part)............................................ 73 73 21 16 1 13 2,105 791 27 33 1 63

 New Castle County (part).............................. 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

 Dagsboro town, Sussex County.................... 17 16 4 3 0 2 706 69 12 3 0 36

 Delaware City city, New Castle County.......... 64 46 16 5 0 5 1,473 231 17 22 0 20

 Delmar town, Sussex County.......................... 75 67 21 7 1 4 1,281 344 27 18 1 19

 Dewey Beach town, Sussex County............. 4 3 00 1 0 318 12 1 3 1 10

 Dover city, Kent County................................... 1,053 1,097 375 328 52 195 18,446 16,312 571 1,310 75 960

 Dover Base Housing CDP, Kent County........ 216 122 47 85 23 37 2,699 580 55 163 32 200

 Edgemoor CDP, New Castle County............ 99 115 39 9 1 16 3,499 2,089 58 72 1 99

 Ellendale town, Sussex County..................... 8 13 6 3 2 0 242 125 6 4 5 15

 Elsmere town, New Castle County................ 165 123 44 33 0 116 4,435 925 92 139 0 786

 Farmington town, Kent County........................ 0 0 00 0 0 110 0 0 0 0 0

 Felton town, Kent County................................. 48 38 12 3 0 12 998 290 20 25 1 23

 Fenwick Island town, Sussex County............ 1 0 10 0 0 371 2 3 1 0 3

 Frankford town, Sussex County.................... 10 11 4 0 2 5 407 249 4 2 11 190

 Frederica town, Kent County......................... 32 33 14 2 0 7 558 183 14 9 1 57

 Georgetown town, Sussex County................ 200 85 51 8 2 133 3,191 1,018 328 78 11 2,038

 Glasgow CDP, New Castle County................ 312 276 71 121 6 67 9,505 3,862 119 937 10 309

 Greenville CDP, New Castle County............. 24 10 3 22 0 6 2,018 121 3 0 190 28

 Greenwood town, Sussex County................. 28 12 17 5 0 0 718 211 17 11 0 48

 Harrington city, Kent County......................... 120 102 55 15 10 15 2,568 931 76 43 14 94

 Hartly town, Kent County.................................. 0 0 00 0 0 72 0 0 1 1 0

 Henlopen Acres town, Sussex County.......... 0 0 00 0 0 118 3 1 0 0 0

 Highland Acres CDP, Kent County................ 96 71 24 44 7 14 2,725 579 45 189 10 45

 Hockessin CDP, New Castle County............ 188 38 38 132 8 31 11,712 434 59 1,429 17 102

 Houston town, Kent County.......................... 2 2 01 0 1 346 22 2 0 4 3

 Kent Acres CDP, Kent County......................... 51 38 17 17 1 8 1,302 505 29 65 1 55

 Kenton town, Kent County.............................. 8 6 20 0 0 242 12 2 0 0 13

 Laurel town, Sussex County............................ 135 155 33 38 15 37 1,889 1,668 75 72 33 188

 Leipsic town, Kent County............................... 6 6 00 0 0 170 9 0 4 0 6

 Lewes city, Sussex County................................ 34 26 17 4 1 1 2,502 237 27 14 3 10

 Little Creek town, Kent County........................ 5 1 40 0 0 214 6 1 7 0 1

 Long Neck CDP, Sussex County.................... 6 3 50 0 1 1,896 44 10 7 0 31

 Magnolia town, Kent County......................... 7 2 42 0 1 182 28 14 3 0 6

 Middletown town, New Castle County........... 457 405 107 132 19 131 12,145 5,772 143 841 27 597

 Milford city............................................................ 189 176 65 27 23 60 6,404 2,304 115 137 45 838

 Kent County (part)............................................ 93 91 24 8 8 41 1,906 1,526 53 46 13 374

 Sussex County (part)....................................... 96 85 41 19 15 19 4,498 778 62 91 32 464

 Millsboro town, Sussex County..................... 90 97 29 20 7 23 2,863 792 49 149 7 154

 Millville town, Sussex County........................ 9 1 17 0 0 515 14 1 0 11 12

 Milton town, Sussex County............................ 75 76 20 3 0 12 2,027 497 38 18 1 92

 Newark city, New Castle County................... 626 318 141 325 31 112 26,532 2,412 194 2,570 41 519

 New Castle city, New Castle County............. 101 95 39 19 2 31 3,660 1,530 57 80 2 105

 Newport town, New Castle County................ 29 26 6 5 2 9 744 220 9 2 21 100

 North Star CDP, New Castle County............. 83 20 8 61 0 27 7,066 270 11 687 0 48

 Ocean View town, Sussex County................ 17 8 65 1 3 1,835 24 7 1 29 8

 Odessa town, New Castle County.................. 12 10 4 5 0 2 334 35 4 0 9 2

20 Delaware Summary Population and Housing Characteristics

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Figure I-2.

PARTS OF A STATISTICAL TABLE

Table number and title Headnote

Heading

Stubhead

Stub

Sidehead

State name and

page number Report title

Spanner

Column head

Boxhead

Data 

field
I-4 How to Use This Census Report

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

In the stub, several features are used to help the user better understand the contents of the table. Usually, 

a block of data lines is preceded by a sidehead. The sidehead, similar to a spanner, describes and classifies 

the stub entries following it. The use of indentation in a stub indicates the relationship of one data line to 

another. Indented data lines represent subcategories that, in most instances, sum to a total. Occasionally 

in tables, it is desirable to show one or more single-line subcategories that do not sum to the total. 

The data field is that part of the statistical table that contains the data. It extends from the bottom of the 

boxhead to the bottom of the table and from the right of the stub to the right edge of the page. 

Both geographic and subject-matter terms appear in tables. It is important to read the definitions of the 

terms used in the tables because census terms often are defined in special ways that reflect the manner in 

which the questions were asked and the data were tabulated. Definitions of geographic terms are provided 

in Appendix A of CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes (<www.census.gov 

/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>). Census tables often include derived measures such as medians, means, percentages, and ratios. These and other subject-matter terms are defined in Appendix B of the same report. 

Symbols and Geographic Abbreviations

The following symbols are used in the tables and explanations of subjects covered in 2010 Census reports:

• A dash ‘‘–’’ represents zero or a derived measure that rounds to less than 0.1. 

• (X) means not applicable. In the 1990 and earlier decennial census reports, three dots ‘‘. . . ’’ meant not 

applicable. 

• (NA) means not available. 

• The superscript prefix ‘‘r’’ indicates that a Census 2000 count has been revised since the publication 

of the Census 2000 reports as a result of certified Count Question Resolution (CQR) changes (see also 

<www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/notes/errata.pdf>). This symbol appears only in the 2010 Census 

CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts, report series. 

• A minus sign ‘‘–’’ preceding a figure denotes decrease. The minus sign appears only in the 2010 Census 

CPH-2, Population and Housing Unit Counts, report series. 

The following are examples of geographic abbreviations and terms that may be used in the tables in this 

report:

• A ‘‘(part)’’ next to the name of a geographic area in a hierarchical presentation indicates that the geographic entity is located only partially in the superior geographic entity. For example, a ‘‘(part)’’ next to a 

place name in a county subdivision-place hierarchy indicates that the place is located in more than one 

county subdivision. (Places also may be ‘‘split’’ by county, congressional district, urban/rural, metropolitan area, voting district, and other geographic boundaries, depending on the presentation.) Other geographic entities also can be ‘‘split’’ by a higher-level entity. The exception is a tabulation block, which is 

unique within all geographic entities in census products. 

• ANVSA is Alaska Native village statistical area. 

• ANRC is Alaska Native Regional Corporation. 

• CCD is census county division. 

• CDP is census designated place. 

• CSA is combined statistical area. 

• NECTA is New England city and town area. 

• Metro Area is metropolitan statistical area. 
How to Use This Census Report I-5

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

• Micro Area is micropolitan statistical area. 

• OTSA is Oklahoma tribal statistical area. 

• SDTSA is state designated tribal statistical area. 

• TDSA is tribal designated statistical area. 

• UT is unorganized territory. 

GRAPHICS

Charts, statistical maps, and other graphic summaries are included in some 2010 Census reports. 

USER NOTES

User notes include general explanatory information, historical notes, and geographic notes. They also provide information about unique characteristics of the report and sometimes changes or corrections made 

too late to be reflected in the text or tables themselves. However, sometimes this information becomes 

available too late to be reflected even in the user notes. Therefore, updates are available in the Notes and 

Errata document at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/notes/errata.pdf>. 

APPENDIXES

Appendixes A through D, and F through H, described below, are in the separate printed volume, CPH-2-A, 

Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, or on the Internet at <www.census.gov/prod 

/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>. Appendix E is included in this report. 

Appendix A, Geographic Terms and Concepts. Provides definitions of the types of geographic areas 

and related information used in census products. 

Appendix B, Definitions of Subject Characteristics. Contains definitions for the subject-matter terms 

used in census products, including explanations of derived measures, limitations of the data, and comparability with previous censuses. The subjects are listed alphabetically. Population characteristics are 

defined first, followed by the definitions of the housing subjects. 

Appendix C, Data Collection and Processing Procedures. Explains the 2010 Census mission and 

scope and provides thumbnail descriptions of 2010 Census operations. 

Appendix D, Questionnaire. Presents a facsimile of the 2010 Census questionnaire used to collect the 

data in this report. 

Appendix E, Maps. Contains maps depicting the geographic areas shown in this report. 

Appendix F, Operational Overview and Accuracy of the Data. Provides information on 2010 Census 

operations, including group quarters enumeration, confidentiality of the data, imputation of housing unit 

status and population counts, sources of errors in the data, and data editing. 

Appendix G, Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census of the United States. 

Contains a description of the residence rule and residence situations used by Census Bureau staff to 

guide decisions on where people should be counted in the 2010 Census. This document is the basis for 

residence-related sections of questionnaires, collection instruments, field materials, and training materials. 

Appendix H, Acknowledgments. Lists many of the U.S. Census Bureau staff who participated in report 

preparation. 

Table Finding Guide II-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Geographic area

Population Housing units Area measurement Av

mi

 2010 Census 

Previous 

censuses

Change 

from 

previous 

census 2010 Census

Previous 

censuses

Change 

from 

previous 

census Total area Land area Po

THE STATE1 

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,4,5,7,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 1,2,4,5,8,9,12 1,4,8,9 1,5,9 8,9 2,5,8,9 Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,3,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 Current urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,2,7,12 1 1 1,2,12 1 1 – 2 1950–90 urban definition . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 – – 

Urban and rural by size of place . . . . . . . 3 – – – – – – – In urbanized area and in urban cluster . . 2,7,12 – – 2,12 – – – 2 

Size of urban area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 – – 2 – – – 2 

In place and not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,7 – – – – – – – 

COUNTY2

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,5,6,8 4,6,8 5,6 4,8 4,8 5 8 5,8 

Urban and rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 – – – – – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 6 6 – – – – – COUNTY SUBDIVISION3

By county . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 

Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 

By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10a 10a – 10a 10a – – – By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11a 11a 11a – – – – – 

PLACEBy county and county subdivision . . . . . . 8 8 – 8 8 – 8 8 

Alphabetically . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 

By 2010 rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 10 – 10 10 – – – 

By percent change rank . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 11 11 – – – – – 

URBAN AREAUrbanized area and urban cluster . . . . . . 12 – 12 – – – – – 

1 State, District of Columbia, or Puerto Rico .2 Parish in Louisiana; city and borough, municipality, borough, or census area in Alaska; and municipio in Puerto Rico; in Maryland, Missouri, Nevada

are independent of counties and are treated as statistical equivalents of counties; the entire District of Columbia, which has no counties, is treated as a c

3 County subdivisions within the state are shown alphabetically with places for the following 12 states: Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, 

New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin .

SUBJECTS BY TYPE OF GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND TABLE NUMBERThe types of geographic areas covered in this report are shown on the side, and subjects are shown at the top. See CPH-2-Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes (<www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf>), for a description of area classiand for definitions and explanations of subject characteristics (Appendix B).

able fT inding Guide

User Notes III-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

User Notes

Additional information concerning this 2010 Census product may become available after this report is 

published. This information, called Notes and Errata, is available in portable document format (PDF) on the 

U.S. Census Bureau’s Internet site at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/notes/errata.pdf>.

GENERAL NOTES

User Note 1

The user should be aware that there are limitations to many of these data. Please refer to the text provided 

with this report for further explanation of the limitations of the data. The population and other data shown 

for the 2010 Census in this report are as of April 1, 2010; the boundaries used for all geographic entities 

are as of January 1, 2010. All boundaries are intended for Census Bureau statistical data collection and 

presentation only; their depiction and designation for statistical purposes do not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority or entitlement. Corrections to the 2010 Census data as a result of certified 

Count Question Resolution (CQR) changes are available from the Census Bureau’s Internet site at 

<www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/notes/errata.pdf>.

User Note 2

Data comparability for county subdivisions is shown only when the county subdivision contains substantially the same territory as reported for Census 2000 (generally defined as at least 60 percent of the 

previous territory). There is no comparability provided for county subdivisions that have been extensively 

revised. Revised entities are noted by and within county. Changes to a geographic entity can be the result 

of legal change actions, statistical redefinition, correction of previous boundary or drafting errors, or new 

erroneous information.

Incorporated place and census designated place (CDP) comparability is provided for all places that retained 

their name or general area without regard to the amount of territorial change between censuses. Place 

comparability is not shown if the entity is new for the 2010 Census or is the result of a merger that created 

an entirely new entity, or if a 2010 Census geographic area shares no area with a Census 2000 area of the 

same name. American Indian area (including tribal subdivisions), Alaska Native area, and Hawaiian home 

land comparability follows the same rules as for place comparability.

User Note 3

When applicable, tables show the revised Census 2000 population and/or housing unit counts that 

resulted from the Count Question Resolution (CQR) program. These revised counts are accompanied by a 

prefix “r” symbol in the data tables.

Derived values (e.g., percent distribution, density, or change) that are calculated from Census 2000 population or housing unit counts only account for the aforementioned CQR revisions in certain cases. 

• Calculations include the corrected Census 2000 counts when a table:

o Shows population or housing unit change (or percent change) from 2000 to 2010.

o Shows population or housing unit change (or percent change) from 1990 to 2000, and also shows 

the 2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from.

o Shows population or housing unit density or percent distribution in 2000, and also shows the 2000 

population or housing unit count that it is derived from.
III-2 User Notes

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

• Calculations do not include the corrected Census 2000 counts when a table:

o Shows population or housing unit change (or percent change) from 1990 to 2000, but does not 

show the 2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from.

o Shows population or housing unit density or percent distribution in 2000, but does not show the 

2000 population or housing unit count that it is derived from. 

• When a table shows component parts of a revised 2000 population or housing unit count (e.g., classified by urban/rural or by size of place), the component parts may not sum to the total population 

or housing unit count, because the component parts were not revised during the 2000 CQR program. 

Therefore, any derived values (e.g., percent distribution or number of places by population size) for the 

component parts cannot account for the revised Census 2000 counts either.

HISTORICAL NOTES

The United States acquired most of the area of North Dakota from France in 1803 as part of the Louisiana 

Purchase. It obtained the area in the north and northeast part of the present-day state by a convention, 

signed with Great Britain in 1818 that extended the northern boundary along the 49th parallel. Dakota 

Territory was organized on March 2, 1861, from unorganized area formerly within Minnesota Territory and 

part of Nebraska Territory. Dakota Territory included all of the present-day states of North Dakota and 

South Dakota, most of Montana, the northern half of Wyoming, and a small part of Nebraska. The territory 

was reduced in 1863 with the organization of Idaho Territory, enlarged in 1864 with the addition of most 

of the remainder of present-day Wyoming, and again reduced with the organization of Wyoming Territory 

in 1868. In 1882, the state of Nebraska acquired an area north of the Keya Paha River and Niobrara River. 

North Dakota was admitted to the Union simultaneously with South Dakota on November 2, 1889, as the 

39th and 40th states, with generally the same boundaries as the present states. 

Census data for the combined area in present-day North Dakota and South Dakota are available in the 

1860 census (and listed in national tables with South Dakota). The 1860 census population is for territory 

reported as ‘‘unorganized Dakota’’ and includes population in areas now in Montana. The 1860 population 

excludes some population enumerated in Nebraska Territory. Although the state had not yet been legally 

established, the 1870 and 1880 populations generally are for the area of the present state. The population 

of Dakota Territory as legally established was 135,177 in 1880 and 14,181 in 1870.

GEOGRAPHIC NOTES

North Dakota is divided into 53 counties. The 1,765 county subdivisions in the state include 1,317 governmentally functioning townships. In 28 counties, some or all of the territory is not organized into townships, and the Census Bureau recognizes 84 unorganized territories in those areas. All 357 incorporated 

places are independent of any county subdivision, creating 364 entities that the Census Bureau treats as 

equivalent to county subdivisions. There are 44 CDPs in North Dakota. Incorporated places in the state are 

legally described as cities, and all are independent of any county subdivision. The Census Bureau treats all 

CDPs as dependent within county subdivisions.

GEOGRAPHIC CHANGE NOTES

The Geographic Change Notes listed below document high-level geographic entities—American Indian 

areas, Alaska Native areas, and Hawaiian home lands; counties and their equivalents; county subdivisions; and places—that are different from the information reported in Census 2000. The notes identify 

geographic entities whose name, legal description, and/or boundary have changed, entities that no longer 

exist, newly established entities (both legal and statistical), and changes in geographic relationships, such 

as places that exist in one county and have expanded into or withdrawn from another county (the notes 

do not identify the other county(ies) in which the entity exists; this can be determined from Table 9 of 

this publication), places that have been removed from comparable 2000 county subdivisions, and places 

that have become independent of or dependent within one or more county subdivisions. The changes are 
User Notes III-3

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

reported by and within county; counties without changes are not shown in the listing. Changes to American Indian areas, Alaska Native areas, and Hawaiian home lands appear after the list of counties; areas with 

no changes are not shown. A few of the reported changes in name, legal status, or legal relationship may 

be incorrect; if so, the correct version is shown in any Correction Notes section above. Some changes are 

the result of legal actions that took place prior to Census 2000 but were not reported in that census.

For the 2010 Census, the notes reflect any boundary change that affects a geographic entity, regardless 

of whether it is the result of legal action, redefinition of a statistical entity, correction of a previous drafting error, or new erroneous information. Between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census, the Census Bureau 

invested in improving the coordinate accuracy of its geographic database. As a result, the geographic 

positions of boundaries may be different between the two censuses even though little or no change actually occurred to the boundaries. In compiling the Geographic Change Notes, the Census Bureau inspected 

the many corrections to determine if a change actually affected significant land area or population. For 

example, the county-level text ‘‘all MCDs [minor civil divisions] revised’’ may reflect a legal redistricting 

of all county subdivisions in the county, a major or minor relocation of county subdivision boundaries due 

to more accurate mapping or more accurate boundary information, or a combination of these that, in one 

way or another, affect every county subdivision in a county. Boundary corrections that resulted in incorporated places gaining or losing territory are shown as annexations or detachments even if no legal action 

occurred between 2000 and 2010. Most places shown with a detachment resulted from such corrections. 

In states whose legal entities rarely undergo a legal boundary change, such as the New England states, 

most of the entities reported to have annexed, detached, exchanged, gained, or lost territory did so as the 

result of mapping changes, not legal actions. The extent and location of the boundary changes affecting 

any particular entity can be determined by comparing the TIGER/Line® Shapefiles, Cartographic Boundary 

Files, or a comparable set of maps for the 2000 and 2010 censuses.

Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places

Adams County—Disorganizations: Whetstone township in 2006 (included in West Adams UT); MCD 

Changes: West Adams UT formed from merger of disorganized Whetstone township and Lemmon UT.

Barnes County—Annexations from MCDs: Valley City city from Valley township; Wimbledon city from 

Pierce township.

Benson County—MCD Changes: Lohnes township gained area from Warwick township; Annexations from 

MCDs: Minnewaukan city from West Bay township; Detachments to MCDs: Minnewaukan city to West Bay 

township; CDP Changes: Fort Totten CDP gained area.

Bottineau County—MCD Changes: Starbuck township gained area from Stone Creek township; Annexations 

from MCDs: Bottineau city from Whitteron township; Maxbass city from Hastings township; Detachments to 

MCDs: Maxbass city to Hastings township.

Bowman County—Annexations from MCDs: Bowman city from Bowman township.

Burke County—Disincorporations: Larson city in 2003 (added to Keller township and defined as a CDP for 

2010); New CDPs: Larson (formed from part of disincorporated Larson city and additional area).

Burleigh County—Annexations from MCDs: Bismarck city from Apple Creek, Gibbs, and Hay Creek townships and Lincoln-Fort Rice UT; Lincoln city from Apple Creek township; Detachments to MCDs: Bismarck 

city to Gibbs and Hay Creek townships; Lincoln city to Apple Creek township; New CDPs: Driscoll 

and Menoken.

Cass County—Annexations from MCDs: Arthur city from Arthur township; Casselton city from Casselton 

and Everest townships; Davenport city from Davenport township; Fargo city from Barnes, Pleasant, Reed, 

and Stanley townships; Harwood city from Harwood and Reed townships; Horace city from Normanna, 

Pleasant, Stanley, and Warren townships; Kindred city from Normanna township; Leonard city from Leonard 
III-4 User Notes

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

township; West Fargo city from Barnes, Mapleton, and Reed townships; Detachments to MCDs: Briarwood 

city to Stanley township; Casselton city to Everest township; New CDPs: Brooktree Park and Embden.

Cavalier County—Disincorporations: Hove Mobile Park city in 2002 (added to Osnabrock township); 

Annexations from MCDs: Milton city from Montrose township; Munich city from Henderson and Trier 

townships; Detachments: Munich city to Henderson and Trier townships.

Dickey County—Annexations from MCDs: Ellendale city from Ellendale township; Fullerton city from Maple 

township; Oakes city from Bear Creek township; Detachments to MCDs: Oakes city to Bear Creek township.

Divide County—Annexations from MCDs: Crosby city from Fillmore township; Noonan city from 

Coalfield township.

Dunn County—New CDPs: Manning.

Emmons County—Disorganizations: Hazelton township in 2001 and Buchanan Valley, Lincoln, and Tell 

townships in 2007 (all added to North Emmons UT); MCD Changes: North Emmons UT includes disorganized Buchanan Valley, Hazelton, Lincoln, and Tell townships and gained area from parts of deleted 

Northeast Emmons and West Emmons UTs; South Emmons UT gained area from parts of deleted Northeast 

Emmons and West Emmons UTs; Annexations from MCDs: Hazelton city from North Emmons UT; 

Detachments to MCDs: Strasburg city to South Emmons UT.

Foster County—Annexations from MCDs: Carrington city from Carrington and Wyard townships; Glenfield 

city from Glenfield township.

Golden Valley County—Disorganizations: Elmwood township in 2006 (taken to form Elmwood UT); 

Annexations from MCDs: Beach city from Beach township; Detachments to MCDs: Beach city to 

Beach township.

Grand Forks County—Annexations from MCDs: Grand Forks city from Brenna and Grand Forks townships; 

Larimore city from Larimore township; Manvel city from Ferry township; Northwood city from Northwood 

township; Detachments to MCDs: Larimore city to Larimore township.

Grant County—Disorganizations: Otter Creek in 2000 (added to East Grant UT); Annexations from MCDs:

Elgin city from Minnie township; New CDPs: Heil and Raleigh.

Griggs County—New CDPs: Jessie and Sutton.

Hettinger County—Disorganizations: Alden and Indian Creek townships in 2005 (merged to form Central 

Hettinger UT).

Kidder County—Disorganizations: Kickapoo township in 1996 (not reported until 2006) (taken to form 

Kickapoo UT); Annexations from MCDs: Tappen city from Tappen township; Detachments to MCDs: Dawson 

city to Sibley township; Tappen city to Tappen township.

LaMoure County—Annexations from MCDs: Kulm city from Norden township; LaMoure city from 

Ryan township.

Logan County—Disorganizations: Bryant (in 2009), Dixon (in 2001), and Starkey (in 2005) townships (all 

added to West Logan UT); MCD Changes: West Logan UT includes disorganized Bryant, Dixon, and Starkey 

townships and gained area from East Logan UT; Annexations from MCDs: Napoleon city from West 

Logan UT,

McKenzie County—Disincorporations: Rawson city in 2002 (parts added to Alex and Arnegard townships); 

Mergers: Elk, Poe, and Wilbur townships merged to form Tri township in 2002; Detachments to MCDs: 

Watford City city to Central McKenzie UT; New CDPs: East Fairview.
User Notes III-5

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

McLean County—Annexations from MCDs: Garrison city from North Central McLean UT; Turtle Lake city 

from Lake Williams township; Underwood city from Underwood UT; Detachments to MCDs: Garrison city 

to North Central McLean UT.

Mercer County—Annexations from MCDs: Beulah city from West Mercer UT; Hazen city from East 

Mercer UT.

Morton County—Annexations from MCDs: Glen Ullin city from West Morton UT; Mandan city from Captain’s 

Landing township and Mandan UT; New CDPs: Harmon.

Mountrail County—Annexations from MCDs: New Town city from Osborn township; Stanley city from Idaho 

township; Detachments to MCDs: Stanley city to Idaho township.

Nelson County—New CDPs: Dahlen.

Oliver County—Annexations from MCDs: Center city from East Oliver UT.

Pembina County—Annexations from MCDs: Cavalier city from Cavalier township; Drayton city from Drayton 

township; Detachments to MCDs: Bathgate city to Bathgate township; Hamilton city to Hamilton township.

Pierce County—Name Changes: Alexanter township name corrected from Alexander; Annexations from 

MCDs: Rugby city from North Pierce UT; New CDPs: Barton, Orrin, and Selz.

Ramsey County—Name Changes: Hope township name changed from Nixon; Organizations: North Creel 

township organized in 2000 from part of Creel township; Annexations from MCDs: Devils Lake city from 

Creel and North Creel townships; Detachments to MCDs: Devils Lake city to Creel township.

Ransom County—Annexations from MCDs: Enderlin city from Liberty township; Sheldon city from Greene 

township; New CDPs: Englevale and McLeod.

Richland County—Annexations from MCDs: Christine city from Eagle township; Colfax city from Colfax 

township; Hankinson city from Waldo township; Wahpeton city from Center and Dwight townships.

Rolette County—Annexations from MCDs: Rolla city from East Rolette UT; St. John city from North Rolette 

UT; New CDPs: Green Acres; CDP Changes: East Dunseith and Shell Valley CDPs gained area.

Sargent County—Annexations from MCDs: Gwinner city from Whitestone Hill township; New CDPs: 

De Lamere.

Sheridan County—Disorganizations: Holmes and New Germantown townships in 2004 (both added to 

North Sheridan UT); MCD Changes: Central Sheridan UT merged into North Sheridan UT; North Sheridan 

UT includes disorganized Holmes and New Germantown townships and merged Central Sheridan UT; 

Annexations from MCDs: Martin city from Martin township; New CDPs: Denhoff.

Sioux County—New CDPs: Porcupine.

Slope County—Disorganizations: Dovre township in 2003 (taken to form part of Northeast Slope UT); Slope 

Center township in 2007 (taken to form part of Central Slope UT); Sunshine township in 2008 (added to 

Northwest Slope UT); MCD Changes: Central Slope UT formed from merger of disorganized Slope Center 

township and Chalky Butte UT; Northeast Slope UT formed from merger of disorganized Dovre township 

and E-Six UT; Northwest Slope UT includes disorganized Sunshine township and gained area from West 

Slope UT; West Slope UT lost area to Northwest Slope UT.

Stark County—Annexations from MCDs: Dickinson city from Dickinson North UT.

Stutsman County—Annexations from MCDs: Jamestown city from Bloom, Homer, and Woodbury townships; 

Detachments to MCDs: Montpelier city to Montpelier township; New CDPs: Spiritwood and Ypsilanti.

Towner County—Disincorporations: Maza city in 2002 (added to Maza township).
III-6 User Notes

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Traill County—Annexations from MCDs: Hillsboro city from Hillsboro township; Mayville city from Mayville 

township; New CDPs: Blanchard and Caledonia.

Walsh County—Annexations from MCDs: Edinburg city from Lampton township; New CDPs: Auburn 

and Nash.

Ward County—Annexations from MCDs: Berthold city from Berthold township; Burlington city from 

Burlington township; Minot city from Afton, Harrison, and Nedrose townships; Detachments to MCDs: 

Berthold city to Berthold township; New CDPs: Foxholm, Logan, and Ruthville; CDP Changes: Minot AFB 

CDP gained and lost area.

Wells County—Annexations from MCDs: Harvey city from Hillsdale and Wells townships; Detachments to 

MCDs: Harvey city to Wells township; New CDPs: Heimdal.

Williams County—Disorganizations: Hofflund township (added to Southeast Williams UT); Organizations:

Pherrin township organized from all of Pherrin UT; MCD Changes: Disorganized Hofflund township and 

Nesson Valley UT merged into Southeast Williams UT; Annexations from MCDs: Williston city from Stony 

Creek and Williston townships.

American Indian Areas

Lake Traverse Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land (part)—Added off-reservation trust land in 

Richland County; Tribal Subdivision Change: Heipa District gained area not in a 2000 tribal subdivision in 

Richland County.

Spirit Lake Reservation—Lost area and removed from Wells County and lost additional area in Benson, 

Eddy, and Ramsey counties; Tribal Subdivision Changes: Crow Hill and St. Michael Districts lost primarily water area to area not in a 2010 tribal subdivision in Benson and Ramsey Counties; Fort Totten District 

lost primarily water area to area not in a 2010 tribal subdivision in Benson and Ramsey Counties (removed 

from Ramsey County); Wood Lake District lost primarily water area to area not in a 2010 tribal subdivision 

in Benson County.

Turtle Mountain Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land (part)—Off-reservation trust land portion lost 

area in Rolette County.
Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places IV-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places: 2010 

Urban Area Place Within Urban Area

URBANIZED AREA

Bismarck, ND Urbanized Area Bismarck city (part)

Mandan city (part)

Fargo, ND--MN Urbanized Area Briarwood city (part)

Fargo city (part)

Frontier city

Horace city (part)

North River city (part)

Prairie Rose city

West Fargo city (part)

Grand Forks, ND--MN Urbanized Area (part) Grand Forks city (part)

URBAN CLUSTER

Beulah, ND Urban Cluster Beulah city (part)

Devils Lake, ND Urban Cluster Devils Lake city (part)

Dickinson, ND Urban Cluster Dickinson city (part)

Grafton, ND Urban Cluster Grafton city (part)

Grand Forks AFB, ND Urban Cluster Emerado city (part)

Grand Forks AFB CDP (part)

Jamestown, ND Urban Cluster Jamestown city (part)

Lincoln, ND Urban Cluster Lincoln city (part)

Minot, ND Urban Cluster Minot city (part)

Minot AFB, ND Urban Cluster Minot AFB CDP (part)

Rugby, ND Urban Cluster Rugby city (part)

Valley City, ND Urban Cluster Valley City city (part)

Wahpeton, ND--MN Urban Cluster (part) Wahpeton city (part)

Williston, ND Urban Cluster Williston city (part)

Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 1. 

Population: Earliest Census to 2010; and Housing Units: 1950 to 2010

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State total Urban Rural Percent of total

State Change from Number of Change from Change from 

Urban and Rural preceding census places of preceding census preceding census 2,500 or 

Number Number Percent more Number Number Percent Number Number Percent Urban Rural

POPULATION

Current urban definition:

 2010 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 30,391 4 .7 16 402,872 43,914 12 .2 269,719 –13,523 –4 .8 59 .9 40 .1

 2000 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 642,200 3,400 0 .5 17 358,958 17,786 5 .2 283,242 –14,386 –4 .8 55 .9 44 .1

 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1950–90 urban definition:

638,800 (X) (X) 19 341,172 (X) (X) 297,628 (X) (X) 53 .4 46 .6

 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 638,800 –13,917 –2 .1 19 340,339 22,029 6 .9 298,461 –35,946 –10 .7 53 .3 46 .7

 1980 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 652,717 34,925 5 .7 20 318,310 44,868 16 .4 334,407 –9,912 –2 .9 48 .8 51 .2

 1970 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 617,792 –14,654 –2 .3 18 273,442 50,734 22 .8 344,319 –65,419 –16 .0 44 .3 55 .7

 1960 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 632,446 12,810 2 .1 15 222,708 57,891 35 .1 409,738 –45,081 –9 .9 35 .2 64 .8

 1950 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pre-1950 urban definition:

619,636 (X) (X) 13 164,817 (X) (X) 454,819 (X) (X) 26 .6 73 .4

 1960 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 632,446 12,810 2 .1 15 221,694 56,877 34 .5 410,752 –44,067 –9 .7 35 .1 64 .9

 1950 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 619,636 –22,299 –3 .5 13 164,817 32,894 24 .9 454,819 –55,193 –10 .8 26 .6 73 .4

 1940 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 641,935 –38,910 –5 .7 12 131,923 18,617 16 .4 510,012 –57,527 –10 .1 20 .6 79 .4

 1930 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 680,845 33,973 5 .3 12 113,306 25,067 28 .4 567,539 8,906 1 .6 16 .6 83 .4

 1920 (Jan . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 646,872 69,816 12 .1 12 88,239 25,003 39 .5 558,633 44,813 8 .7 13 .6 86 .4

 1910 (Apr . 15) . . . . . . . . . . . . 577,056 257,910 80 .8 10 63,236 39,823 170 .1 513,820 218,087 73 .7 11 .0 89 .0

 1900 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 319,146 128,163 67 .1 4 23,413 12,770 120 .0 295,733 115,393 64 .0 7 .3 92 .7

 1890 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190,983 154,074 417 .4 2 10,643 7,950 295 .2 180,340 146,124 427 .1 5 .6 94 .4

 1880 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,909 34,504 1,434 .7 1 2,693 2,693 (X) 34,216 31,811 1,322 .7 7 .3 92 .7

 1870 (June 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

HOUSING UNITS

Current urban definition:

2,405 (X) (X) – – (X) (X) 2,405 (X) (X) – 100 .0

 2010 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 317,498 27,820 9 .6 (X) 182,040 25,495 16 .3 135,458 2,326 1 .7 57 .3 42 .7

 2000 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . r 289,678 13,338 4 .8 (X) 156,545 16,590 11 .9 133,132 –3,253 –2 .4 54 .0 46 .0

 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1950–90 urban definition:

276,340 (X) (X) (X) 139,955 (X) (X) 136,385 (X) (X) 50 .6 49 .4

 1990 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276,340 17,568 6 .8 (X) 139,382 17,301 14 .2 136,958 267 0 .2 50 .4 49 .6

 1980 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258,772 54,537 26 .7 (X) 122,081 38,059 45 .3 136,691 16,491 13 .7 47 .2 52 .8

 1970 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204,235 9,638 5 .0 (X) 84,022 17,845 27 .0 120,200 –8,220 –6 .4 41 .1 58 .9

 1960 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194,597 18,828 10 .7 (X) 66,177 19,967 43 .2 128,420 –1,139 –0 .9 34 .0 66 .0

 1950 (Apr . 1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175,769 (X) (X) (X) 46,210 (X) (X) 129,559 (X) (X) 26 .3 73 .7
2 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 2. 

Population, Housing Units, and Land Area by Urban and Rural and Size of Urban Area: 2010

[Areas classified by population size . For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Urban and Rural

Size of Urban Area [Population]

Population Housing units Land area Number of urban areas

Total

Percent 

distribution Total

Percent 

distribution

In square 

miles

Percent 

distribution Total

Entirely in 

state

Partly in 

state

 North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 100 .0 317,498 100 .0 69,001 100 .0 16 13 3

 Urban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402,872 59 .9 182,040 57 .3 184 0 .3 16 13 3

In urbanized area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,056 40 .0 122,440 38 .6 112 0 .2 3 1 2

 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – –

 500,000 to 999,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – –

 250,000 to 499,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – –

 100,000 to 249,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,149 20 .0 61,615 19 .4 53 0 .1 1 – 1

 50,000 to 99,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,907 20 .1 60,825 19 .2 59 0 .1 2 1 1

In urban cluster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133,816 19 .9 59,600 18 .8 72 0 .1 13 12 1

 25,000 to 49,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,650 6 .3 19,484 6 .1 22 – 1 1 –

 10,000 to 24,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55,831 8 .3 24,909 7 .9 29 – 4 3 1

 5,000 to 9,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,654 2 .9 8,391 2 .6 12 – 3 3 –

 2,500 to 4,999 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,681 2 .3 6,816 2 .2 8 – 5 5 –

 Cumulative summary:

Urban area of —

 1,000,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – –

 500,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – –

 250,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – –

 100,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,149 20 .0 61,615 19 .4 53 0 .1 1 – 1

 50,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,056 40 .0 122,440 38 .6 112 0 .2 3 1 2

 25,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 311,706 46 .3 141,924 44 .7 135 0 .2 4 2 2

 10,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367,537 54 .6 166,833 52 .6 164 0 .2 8 5 3

 5,000 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 387,191 57 .6 175,224 55 .2 176 0 .3 11 8 3

 2,500 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402,872 59 .9 182,040 57 .3 184 0 .3 16 13 3

 Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,719 40 .1 135,458 42 .7 68,817 99 .7 (X) (X) (X)
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 3

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

This page is intentionally blank.
4 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 3. 

Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010

[Places classified by population size. For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Size of Place [Population]

Total Urban 

Population

Number of 

places

Percent

of total 

population Total

In place

Not in 

place 

All urban places

(entirely or partly urban) Entirely urban places Partly urban places 

Population

Number of 

places Population

Number of 

places Population

Number of 

places 

 North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 401 100.0 402,872 395,625 24 287 2 395,338 22 7,247 

 In place . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 524,124 401 77.9 395,625 395,625 24 287 2 395,338 22 (X) 

 Not in place . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148,467 (X) 22.1 7,247 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 7,247 

In place of–— 

1,000,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) 

500,000 to 999,999. . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) 

250,000 to 499,999. . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) 

100,000 to 249,999. . . . . . . . . . 105,549 1 15.7 105,426 105,426 1 – – 105,426 1 (X) 

50,000 to 99,999. . . . . . . . . . . . 114,110 2 17.0 113,982 113,982 2 – – 113,982 2 (X) 

25,000 to 49,999. . . . . . . . . . . . 66,718 2 9.9 66,582 66,582 2 – – 66,582 2 (X) 

10,000 to 24,999. . . . . . . . . . . . 66,261 4 9.9 65,498 65,498 4 – – 65,498 4 (X) 

5,000 to 9,999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,013 4 4.0 26,955 26,955 4 – – 26,955 4 (X) 

2,500 to 4,999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10,281 3 1.5 9,983 9,983 3 – – 9,983 3 (X) 

2,000 to 2,499. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,451 9 3.0 6,444 6,444 3 – – 6,444 3 (X) 

1,500 to 1,999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,297 8 2.1 – – – – – – – (X) 

1,000 to 1,499. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,712 21 3.8 – – – – – – – (X) 

500 to 999. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,105 50 5.4 – – – – – – – (X) 

200 to 499. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,866 66 3.0 623 623 2 214 1 409 1 (X) 

Less than 200. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,761 231 2.6 132 132 3 73 1 59 2 (X) 

Cumulative summary: 

In place of— 

1,000,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) 

500,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) 

250,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – – – – – (X) 

100,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 1 15.7 105,426 105,426 1 – – 105,426 1 (X) 

50,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 219,659 3 32.7 219,408 219,408 3 – – 219,408 3 (X) 

25,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 286,377 5 42.6 285,990 285,990 5 – – 285,990 5 (X) 

10,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352,638 9 52.4 351,488 351,488 9 – – 351,488 9 (X) 

5,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 379,651 13 56.5 378,443 378,443 13 – – 378,443 13 (X) 

2,500 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 389,932 16 58.0 388,426 388,426 16 – – 388,426 16 (X) 

2,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 410,383 25 61.0 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 

1,500 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 424,680 33 63.1 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 

1,000 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 450,392 54 67.0 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 

500 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 486,497 104 72.3 394,870 394,870 19 – – 394,870 19 (X) 

200 or more. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 506,363 170 75.3 395,493 395,493 21 214 1 395,279 20 (X) 
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 5

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 3. 

Population by Urban and Rural and Size of Place: 2010—Con.

[Places classified by population size. For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Rural

State

Size of Place [Population]

Total

In place

Not in 

place

All rural places

(entirely or partly rural) Entirely rural places Partly rural places

Population

Number of 

places Population

Number of 

places Population

Number of 

places

269,719 128,499 399 126,159 377 2,340 22 141,220 North Dakota

128,499 128,499 399 126,159 377 2,340 22 (X) In place

141,220 (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) (X) 141,220 Not in place

In place of—

– – – – – – – (X) 1,000,000 or more

– – – – – – – (X) 500,000 to 999,999

– – – – – – – (X) 250,000 to 499,999

123 123 1 – – 123 1 (X) 100,000 to 249,999

128 128 2 – – 128 2 (X) 50,000 to 99,999

136 136 2 – – 136 2 (X) 25,000 to 49,999

763 763 4 – – 763 4 (X) 10,000 to 24,999

58 58 4 – – 58 4 (X) 5,000 to 9,999

298 298 3 – – 298 3 (X) 2,500 to 4,999

14,007 14,007 9 13,248 6 759 3 (X) 2,000 to 2,499

14,297 14,297 8 14,297 8 – – (X) 1,500 to 1,999

25,712 25,712 21 25,712 21 – – (X) 1,000 to 1,499

36,105 36,105 50 36,105 50 – – (X) 500 to 999

19,243 19,243 65 19,238 64 5 1 (X) 200 to 499

17,629 17,629 230 17,559 228 70 2 (X) Less than 200

Cumulative summary:

In place of—

– – – – – – – (X) 1,000,000 or more

– – – – – – – (X) 500,000 or more

– – – – – – – (X) 250,000 or more

123 123 1 – – 123 1 (X) 100,000 or more

251 251 3 – – 251 3 (X) 50,000 or more

387 387 5 – – 387 5 (X) 25,000 or more

1,150 1,150 9 – – 1,150 9 (X) 10,000 or more

1,208 1,208 13 – – 1,208 13 (X) 5,000 or more

1,506 1,506 16 – – 1,506 16 (X) 2,500 or more

15,513 15,513 25 13,248 6 2,265 19 (X) 2,000 or more

29,810 29,810 33 27,545 14 2,265 19 (X) 1,500 or more

55,522 55,522 54 53,257 35 2,265 19 (X) 1,000 or more

91,627 91,627 104 89,362 85 2,265 19 (X) 500 or more

110,870 110,870 169 108,600 149 2,270 20 (X) 200 or more
6 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 4. 

Population and Housing Units: 1970 to 2010

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990 1980 1970 2010 2000 1990 1980 1970

 North Dakota . . . . . . . . 672,591 642,200 638,800 652,717 617,792 317,498 r 289,678 276,340 258,772 204,235

Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 2,593 3,174 3,584 3,832 1,377 1,416 1,504 1,563 1,317

Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 11,775 12,545 13,960 14,669 5,704 5,599 5,801 5,976 5,302

Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 6,964 7,198 7,944 8,245 2,950 2,932 3,163 3,084 2,718

Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 888 1,108 1,138 1,198 484 529 533 517 392

Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 7,149 8,011 9,239 9,496 4,341 4,409 4,661 4,679 4,009

Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 3,242 3,596 4,229 3,901 1,683 1,596 1,691 1,722 1,365

Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 2,242 3,002 3,822 4,739 1,340 1,412 1,691 1,816 1,813

Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 69,416 60,131 54,811 40,714 35,754 r 29,004 23,803 20,848 12,983

Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 123,138 102,874 88,247 73,653 67,938 53,790 42,407 35,215 24,278

Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 4,831 6,064 7,636 8,213 2,309 2,725 3,038 3,123 2,932

Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 5,757 6,107 7,207 6,976 2,636 2,656 2,763 2,838 2,471

Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 2,283 2,899 3,494 4,564 1,324 1,469 1,667 1,783 1,667

Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 3,600 4,005 4,627 4,895 2,132 1,965 2,057 1,849 1,605

Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 2,757 2,951 3,554 4,103 1,323 1,418 1,470 1,541 1,477

Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 4,331 4,830 5,877 7,200 2,085 2,168 2,200 2,322 2,167

Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 3,759 3,983 4,611 4,832 1,801 1,793 1,876 1,827 1,649

Golden Valley County . . . . . . . 1,680 1,924 2,108 2,391 2,611 967 973 1,035 1,033 915

Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . 66,861 66,109 70,683 66,100 61,102 29,344 27,373 27,085 24,563 18,192

Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 2,841 3,549 4,274 5,009 1,690 1,722 2,011 1,969 1,649

Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 2,754 3,303 3,714 4,184 1,461 1,521 1,660 1,739 1,658

Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 2,715 3,445 4,275 5,075 1,414 1,419 1,637 1,668 1,579

Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 2,753 3,332 3,833 4,362 1,674 1,610 1,672 1,740 1,505

LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 4,701 5,383 6,473 7,117 2,238 2,271 2,434 2,527 2,550

Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 2,308 2,847 3,493 4,245 1,144 1,193 1,335 1,422 1,384

McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 5,987 6,528 7,858 8,977 2,948 2,983 3,320 3,437 3,223

McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 3,390 4,021 4,800 5,545 1,858 1,853 2,031 2,197 1,982

McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 5,737 6,383 7,132 6,127 3,090 2,719 3,178 2,944 2,227

McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 9,311 10,457 12,383 11,251 5,590 5,264 5,515 5,754 4,282

Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 8,644 9,808 9,404 6,175 4,450 4,402 4,496 3,978 2,253

Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 25,303 23,700 25,177 20,310 12,079 10,587 9,467 9,382 6,317

Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 6,631 7,021 7,679 8,437 4,119 3,438 3,675 3,201 3,176

Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 3,715 4,410 5,233 5,807 1,927 2,014 2,261 2,442 2,214

Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 2,065 2,381 2,495 2,322 905 903 968 960 753

Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 8,585 9,238 10,399 10,728 3,859 4,115 4,294 4,438 3,894

Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 4,675 5,052 6,166 6,323 2,199 2,269 2,355 2,376 2,076

Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 12,066 12,681 13,048 12,915 5,615 5,729 5,616 5,259 4,387

Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 5,890 5,921 6,698 7,102 2,656 2,604 2,569 2,712 2,602

Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 2,610 3,160 3,608 3,828 1,386 1,413 1,558 1,530 1,395

Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 17,998 18,148 19,207 18,089 7,503 7,575 7,394 7,182 5,749

Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 13,674 12,772 12,177 11,549 5,372 5,027 4,742 3,923 3,015

Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 4,366 4,549 5,512 5,937 2,004 2,016 2,057 2,210 2,025

Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 1,710 2,148 2,819 3,232 894 924 1,061 1,180 1,202

Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 4,044 3,761 3,620 3,632 1,311 1,216 1,175 1,062 943

Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 767 907 1,157 1,484 436 451 481 513 477

Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 22,636 22,832 23,697 19,613 10,735 9,722 9,585 8,487 5,748

Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 2,258 2,420 3,106 3,749 1,171 1,231 1,311 1,447 1,394

Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 21,908 22,241 24,154 23,550 9,862 9,817 9,770 9,663 7,741

Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 2,876 3,627 4,052 4,645 1,449 1,558 1,770 1,692 1,684

Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 8,477 8,752 9,624 9,571 3,780 3,708 3,770 3,926 3,529

Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 12,389 13,840 15,371 16,251 5,498 5,757 6,093 6,153 5,307

Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 58,795 57,921 58,392 58,560 26,744 25,097 23,585 21,521 17,402

Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 5,102 5,864 6,979 7,847 2,481 2,643 2,869 2,886 2,881

Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 19,761 21,129 22,237 19,301 10,464 9,680 10,180 8,953 6,780
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 7

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 5. 

Population, Housing Units, Land Area, and Density: 2010; and Percent Change: 1980 to 2010

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

Population

Housing 

units

Land area 

in square 

miles

Average per square 

mile of land Percent change

Population 

density

Housing 

unit 

density

Population Housing units

2000 to 

2010

1990 to 

2000

1980 to 

1990

2000 to 

2010

1990 to 

2000

1980 to 

1990

 North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 317,498 69,000 .80 9 .7 4 .6 4 .7 0 .5 –2 .1 9 .6 4 .8 6 .8

Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 1,377 987 .62 2 .4 1 .4 –9 .6 –18 .3 –11 .4 –2 .8 –5 .9 –3 .8

Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 5,704 1,491 .55 7 .4 3 .8 –6 .0 –6 .1 –10 .1 1 .9 –3 .5 –2 .9

Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 2,950 1,388 .71 4 .8 2 .1 –4 .4 –3 .3 –9 .4 0 .6 –7 .3 2 .6

Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 484 1,148 .85 0 .7 0 .4 –11 .8 –19 .9 –2 .6 –8 .5 –0 .8 3 .1

Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 4,341 1,668 .42 3 .9 2 .6 –10 .1 –10 .8 –13 .3 –1 .5 –5 .4 –0 .4

Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 1,683 1,161 .81 2 .7 1 .4 –2 .8 –9 .8 –15 .0 5 .5 –5 .6 –1 .8

Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 1,340 1,103 .57 1 .8 1 .2 –12 .2 –25 .3 –21 .5 –5 .1 –16 .5 –6 .9

Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 35,754 1,632 .65 49 .8 21 .9 17 .1 15 .4 9 .7 23 .3 21 .8 14 .2

Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 67,938 1,764 .94 84 .9 38 .5 21 .6 19 .7 16 .6 26 .3 26 .8 20 .4

Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 2,309 1,488 .75 2 .7 1 .6 –17 .3 –20 .3 –20 .6 –15 .3 –10 .3 –2 .7

Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 2,636 1,131 .47 4 .7 2 .3 –8 .1 –5 .7 –15 .3 –0 .8 –3 .9 –2 .6

Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 1,324 1,260 .79 1 .6 1 .1 –9 .3 –21 .2 –17 .0 –9 .9 –11 .9 –6 .5

Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 2,132 2,008 .46 1 .8 1 .1 –1 .8 –10 .1 –13 .4 8 .5 –4 .5 11 .2

Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 1,323 630 .17 3 .8 2 .1 –13 .5 –6 .6 –17 .0 –6 .7 –3 .5 –4 .6

Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 2,085 1,510 .43 2 .4 1 .4 –18 .0 –10 .3 –17 .8 –3 .8 –1 .5 –5 .3

Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 1,801 635 .45 5 .3 2 .8 –11 .1 –5 .6 –13 .6 0 .4 –4 .4 2 .7

Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,680 967 1,000 .79 1 .7 1 .0 –12 .7 –8 .7 –11 .8 –0 .6 –6 .0 0 .2

Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,861 29,344 1,436 .38 46 .5 20 .4 1 .1 –6 .5 6 .9 7 .2 1 .1 10 .3

Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 1,690 1,659 .14 1 .4 1 .0 –15 .7 –19 .9 –17 .0 –1 .9 –14 .4 2 .1

Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 1,461 708 .81 3 .4 2 .1 –12 .1 –16 .6 –11 .1 –3 .9 –8 .4 –4 .5

Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 1,414 1,132 .22 2 .2 1 .2 –8 .8 –21 .2 –19 .4 –0 .4 –13 .3 –1 .9

Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 1,674 1,351 .19 1 .8 1 .2 –11 .6 –17 .4 –13 .1 4 .0 –3 .7 –3 .9

LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 2,238 1,145 .94 3 .6 2 .0 –12 .0 –12 .7 –16 .8 –1 .5 –6 .7 –3 .7

Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 1,144 992 .82 2 .0 1 .2 –13 .8 –18 .9 –18 .5 –4 .1 –10 .6 –6 .1

McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 2,948 1,873 .95 2 .9 1 .6 –9 .9 –8 .3 –16 .9 –1 .2 –10 .2 –3 .4

McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 1,858 974 .73 2 .9 1 .9 –17 .1 –15 .7 –16 .2 0 .3 –8 .8 –7 .6

McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 3,090 2,760 .32 2 .3 1 .1 10 .9 –10 .1 –10 .5 13 .6 –14 .4 7 .9

McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 5,590 2,110 .88 4 .2 2 .6 –3 .7 –11 .0 –15 .6 6 .2 –4 .6 –4 .2

Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 4,450 1,042 .96 8 .1 4 .3 –2 .5 –11 .9 4 .3 1 .1 –2 .1 13 .0

Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 12,079 1,926 .27 14 .3 6 .3 8 .6 6 .8 –5 .9 14 .1 11 .8 0 .9

Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 4,119 1,825 .30 4 .2 2 .3 15 .7 –5 .6 –8 .6 19 .8 –6 .4 14 .8

Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 1,927 981 .77 3 .2 2 .0 –15 .9 –15 .8 –15 .7 –4 .3 –10 .9 –7 .4

Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 905 722 .51 2 .6 1 .3 –10 .6 –13 .3 –4 .6 0 .2 –6 .7 0 .8

Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 3,859 1,118 .69 6 .6 3 .4 –13 .7 –7 .1 –11 .2 –6 .2 –4 .2 –3 .2

Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 2,199 1,018 .60 4 .3 2 .2 –6 .8 –7 .5 –18 .1 –3 .1 –3 .7 –0 .9

Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 5,615 1,186 .85 9 .6 4 .7 –5 .1 –4 .8 –2 .8 –2 .0 2 .0 6 .8

Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 2,656 862 .36 6 .3 3 .1 –7 .4 –0 .5 –11 .6 2 .0 1 .4 –5 .3

Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 1,386 877 .05 2 .8 1 .6 –5 .4 –17 .4 –12 .4 –1 .9 –9 .3 1 .8

Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 7,503 1,435 .78 11 .4 5 .2 –9 .3 –0 .8 –5 .5 –1 .0 2 .4 3 .0

Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 5,372 903 .08 15 .4 5 .9 1 .9 7 .1 4 .9 6 .9 6 .0 20 .9

Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 2,004 858 .51 4 .5 2 .3 –12 .3 –4 .0 –17 .5 –0 .6 –2 .0 –6 .9

Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 894 972 .38 1 .4 0 .9 –22 .7 –20 .4 –23 .8 –3 .2 –12 .9 –10 .1

Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 1,311 1,094 .09 3 .8 1 .2 2 .7 7 .5 3 .9 7 .8 3 .5 10 .6

Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 436 1,214 .92 0 .6 0 .4 –5 .2 –15 .4 –21 .6 –3 .3 –6 .2 –6 .2

Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 10,735 1,334 .74 18 .1 8 .0 6 .9 –0 .9 –3 .7 10 .4 1 .4 12 .9

Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 1,171 712 .22 2 .8 1 .6 –12 .5 –6 .7 –22 .1 –4 .9 –6 .1 –9 .4

Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 9,862 2,221 .72 9 .5 4 .4 –3 .7 –1 .5 –7 .9 0 .5 0 .5 1 .1

Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 1,449 1,024 .56 2 .2 1 .4 –21 .9 –20 .7 –10 .5 –7 .0 –12 .0 4 .6

Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 3,780 861 .95 9 .4 4 .4 –4 .2 –3 .1 –9 .1 1 .9 –1 .6 –4 .0

Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 5,498 1,281 .93 8 .7 4 .3 –10 .3 –10 .5 –10 .0 –4 .5 –5 .5 –1 .0

Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 26,744 2,013 .28 30 .6 13 .3 4 .9 1 .5 –0 .8 6 .6 6 .4 9 .6

Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 2,481 1,271 .05 3 .3 2 .0 –17 .5 –13 .0 –16 .0 –6 .1 –7 .9 –0 .6

Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 10,464 2,077 .40 10 .8 5 .0 13 .3 –6 .5 –5 .0 8 .1 –4 .9 13 .7
8 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 6. 

Rank of Counties by Percent Change in 

Population: 2000 to 2010 

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .”

information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

 For 

County/County Equivalent Population Percent change

2010 2000 Rank Percent

Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 123,138 1 21 .6

Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 69,416 2 17 .1

Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 6,631 3 15 .7

Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 19,761 4 13 .3

McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 5,737 5 10 .9

Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 25,303 6 8 .6

Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 22,636 7 6 .9

Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 58,795 8 4 .9

Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 4,044 9 2 .7

Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 13,674 10 1 .9

Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,861 66,109 11 1 .1

Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 3,600 12 –1 .8

Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 8,644 13 –2 .5

Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 3,242 14 –2 .8

Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 21,908 15 –3 .7

McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 9,311 16 –3 .7

Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 8,477 17 –4 .2

Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 6,964 18 –4 .4

Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 12,066 19 –5 .1

Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 767 20 –5 .2

Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 2,610 21 –5 .4

Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 11,775 22 –6 .0

Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 4,675 23 –6 .8

Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 5,890 24 –7 .4

Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 5,757 25 –8 .1

Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 2,715 26 –8 .8

Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 2,283 27 –9 .3

Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 17,998 28 –9 .3

Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 2,593 29 –9 .6

McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 5,987 30 –9 .9

Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 7,149 31 –10 .1

Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 12,389 32 –10 .3

Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 2,065 33 –10 .6

Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 3,759 34 –11 .1

Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 2,753 35 –11 .6

Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 888 36 –11 .8

LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 4,701 37 –12 .0

Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 2,754 38 –12 .1

Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 2,242 39 –12 .2

Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 4,366 40 –12 .3

Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 2,258 41 –12 .5

Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,680 1,924 42 –12 .7

Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 2,757 43 –13 .5

Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 8,585 44 –13 .7

Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 2,308 45 –13 .8

Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 2,841 46 –15 .7

Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 3,715 47 –15 .9

McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 3,390 48 –17 .1

Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 4,831 49 –17 .3

Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 5,102 50 –17 .5

Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 4,331 51 –18 .0

Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 2,876 52 –21 .9

Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 1,710 53 –22 .7
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 9

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 7. 

Population by Urban and Rural: 2010

[For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent Total 

population

Urban Rural Percent of total 

population

Total

In urbanized 

area

In urban 

cluster Total In place Not in place Urban Rural

 North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 402,872 269,056 133,816 269,719 128,499 141,220 59 .9 40 .1

Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 – – – 2,343 1,438 905 – 100 .0

Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 6,689 – 6,689 4,377 1,148 3,229 60 .4 39 .6

Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 – – – 6,660 2,629 4,031 – 100 .0

Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 – – – 783 112 671 – 100 .0

Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 – – – 6,429 3,441 2,988 – 100 .0

Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 – – – 3,151 2,116 1,035 – 100 .0

Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 – – – 1,968 1,108 860 – 100 .0

Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 66,227 63,235 2,992 15,081 685 14,396 81 .5 18 .5

Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 134,149 134,149 – 15,629 9,119 6,510 89 .6 10 .4

Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 – – – 3,993 2,493 1,500 – 100 .0

Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 – – – 5,289 3,416 1,873 – 100 .0

Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 – – – 2,071 1,239 832 – 100 .0

Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 – – – 3,536 1,246 2,290 – 100 .0

Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 – – – 2,385 1,595 790 – 100 .0

Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 – – – 3,550 1,833 1,717 – 100 .0

Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 – – – 3,343 2,275 1,068 – 100 .0

Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . 1,680 – – – 1,680 1,136 544 – 100 .0

Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,861 55,649 52,952 2,697 11,212 4,170 7,042 83 .2 16 .8

Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 – – – 2,394 1,199 1,195 – 100 .0

Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 – – – 2,420 1,340 1,080 – 100 .0

Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 – – – 2,477 1,481 996 – 100 .0

Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 – – – 2,435 1,160 1,275 – 100 .0

LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 – – – 4,139 2,172 1,967 – 100 .0

Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 – – – 1,990 1,162 828 – 100 .0

McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 – – – 5,395 2,770 2,625 – 100 .0

McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 – – – 2,809 1,913 896 – 100 .0

McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 – – – 6,360 3,271 3,089 – 100 .0

McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 – – – 8,962 5,794 3,168 – 100 .0

Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 2,949 – 2,949 5,475 3,497 1,978 35 .0 65 .0

Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 18,720 18,720 – 8,751 3,068 5,683 68 .1 31 .9

Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 – – – 7,673 4,708 2,965 – 100 .0

Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 – – – 3,126 1,983 1,143 – 100 .0

Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 – – – 1,846 571 1,275 – 100 .0

Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 – – – 7,413 4,795 2,618 – 100 .0

Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 2,824 – 2,824 1,533 244 1,289 64 .8 35 .2

Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 7,444 – 7,444 4,007 610 3,397 65 .0 35 .0

Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 – – – 5,457 3,321 2,136 – 100 .0

Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 – – – 2,470 1,468 1,002 – 100 .0

Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 7,834 – 7,834 8,487 3,600 4,887 48 .0 52 .0

Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 – – – 13,937 7,358 6,579 – 100 .0

Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 – – – 3,829 2,300 1,529 – 100 .0

Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 – – – 1,321 576 745 – 100 .0

Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 – – – 4,153 1,448 2,705 – 100 .0

Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 – – – 727 156 571 – 100 .0

Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 17,586 – 17,586 6,613 2,344 4,269 72 .7 27 .3

Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 – – – 1,975 830 1,145 – 100 .0

Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 15,284 – 15,284 5,816 1,565 4,251 72 .4 27 .6

Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 – – – 2,246 1,395 851 – 100 .0

Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 – – – 8,121 5,592 2,529 – 100 .0

Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 4,219 – 4,219 6,900 3,386 3,514 37 .9 62 .1

Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 48,171 – 48,171 13,504 5,108 8,396 78 .1 21 .9

Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 – – – 4,207 2,685 1,522 – 100 .0

Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 15,127 – 15,127 7,271 2,430 4,841 67 .5 32 .5
10 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 642,200 638,800 317,498 r 289,678 276,340 70,698 .32 69,000 .80 9 .7 4 .6

Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,343 2,593 3,174 1,377 1,416 1,504 988 .71 987 .62 2 .4 1 .4

 Beisigl township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 25 25 11 13 10 36 .06 36 .04 0 .6 0 .3

 Bucyrus city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 22 17 16 14 0 .35 0 .35 77 .1 48 .6

 Bucyrus township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 40 36 19 19 20 35 .58 35 .58 0 .8 0 .5

 Cedar township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 21 21 12 10 10 31 .65 31 .65 0 .8 0 .4

 Central Adams UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 64 95 37 35 40 71 .94 71 .92 0 .8 0 .5

 Chandler township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 9 29 9 9 12 36 .03 36 .01 0 .4 0 .2

 Clermont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 25 32 17 14 15 35 .93 35 .89 1 .0 0 .5

 Darling Springs township . . . . . . . . . 22 32 31 14 16 18 31 .08 31 .08 0 .7 0 .5

 Duck Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 33 41 11 11 13 35 .93 35 .93 0 .7 0 .3

 East Adams UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 192 146 97 102 70 215 .73 215 .61 0 .7 0 .4

 Gilstrap township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 28 36 11 11 12 35 .94 35 .93 0 .6 0 .3

 Haynes city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 19 37 16 15 16 0 .14 0 .14 164 .3 114 .3

 Hettinger city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,226 1,307 1,574 704 720 769 0 .86 0 .85 1,442 .4 828 .2

 Hettinger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 195 198 218 108 100 102 35 .10 34 .89 5 .6 3 .1

 Holden UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 32 (X) 18 15 (X) 35 .94 35 .94 0 .6 0 .5

 Lightning Creek township . . . . . . . . . 14 24 22 9 10 14 36 .06 36 .06 0 .4 0 .2

 Maine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 18 32 12 13 12 31 .73 31 .73 0 .7 0 .4

 Orange township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 40 15 17 20 35 .94 35 .80 0 .6 0 .4

 Reeder city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 181 252 114 130 136 0 .62 0 .62 261 .3 183 .9

 Reeder township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 38 51 23 22 27 35 .23 35 .07 1 .1 0 .7

 Scott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 124 150 49 50 54 36 .05 35 .84 3 .0 1 .4

 South Fork township . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 23 17 8 11 10 36 .05 36 .05 0 .3 0 .2

 Taylor Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 19 34 9 12 13 35 .90 35 .89 0 .4 0 .3

 West Adams UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) 66 .95 66 .88 0 .5 0 .3

 Wolf Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 39 52 17 21 20 35 .95 35 .89 0 .7 0 .5

Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,066 11,775 12,545 5,704 5,599 5,801 1,513 .40 1,491 .55 7 .4 3 .8

 Alta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 98 107 45 43 45 36 .20 36 .19 3 .0 1 .2

 Anderson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 56 64 23 23 31 36 .15 35 .81 1 .5 0 .6

 Ashtabula township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 93 119 179 145 159 36 .18 32 .77 3 .4 5 .5

 Baldwin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 34 39 20 19 23 36 .26 35 .48 0 .9 0 .6

 Binghampton township . . . . . . . . . . . 76 100 113 39 39 45 35 .62 35 .54 2 .1 1 .1

 Brimer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 66 70 23 28 29 35 .98 35 .52 1 .7 0 .6

 Cuba township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 89 85 32 33 35 35 .74 35 .71 2 .1 0 .9

 Dazey city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 91 129 56 47 52 0 .38 0 .38 273 .7 147 .4

 Dazey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 59 72 22 21 29 35 .39 35 .00 1 .5 0 .6

 Eckelson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 95 100 54 50 54 36 .30 34 .92 3 .2 1 .5

 Edna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 74 95 30 32 37 35 .79 34 .44 2 .2 0 .9

 Ellsbury township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 28 59 15 14 23 35 .94 35 .94 0 .8 0 .4

 Fingal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 133 138 57 62 69 0 .42 0 .42 231 .0 135 .7

 Getchell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 68 81 49 33 42 35 .82 34 .78 2 .1 1 .4

 Grand Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . 48 49 43 24 21 23 36 .19 36 .19 1 .3 0 .7

 Green township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 97 88 38 40 44 35 .81 35 .35 2 .4 1 .1

 Greenland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 52 75 25 25 31 36 .17 36 .17 1 .2 0 .7

 Hemen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 38 50 14 14 22 36 .09 35 .16 0 .8 0 .4

 Hobart township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 149 137 55 61 55 36 .06 34 .38 3 .2 1 .6

 Kathryn city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 63 72 37 43 46 0 .59 0 .59 88 .1 62 .7

 Lake Town township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 40 56 20 23 29 35 .55 34 .55 1 .1 0 .6

 Leal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 36 35 11 12 16 0 .14 0 .14 142 .9 78 .6

 Litchville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 191 205 98 110 125 1 .48 1 .48 116 .2 66 .2

 Mansfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 41 38 15 17 23 36 .27 35 .73 1 .1 0 .4

 Marsh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 283 229 246 102 85 85 35 .96 35 .91 7 .9 2 .8

 Meadow Lake township . . . . . . . . . . 81 93 95 29 32 36 36 .37 36 .11 2 .2 0 .8

 Minnie Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 50 63 75 26 26 32 36 .14 36 .13 1 .4 0 .7

 Nelson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 61 79 29 29 30 36 .02 35 .98 1 .6 0 .8

 Noltimier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 89 91 34 37 38 36 .07 35 .96 1 .8 0 .9

 Nome city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 70 82 35 38 43 0 .41 0 .41 151 .2 85 .4

 Norma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 54 58 24 27 27 35 .96 35 .67 1 .0 0 .7

 Oakhill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 79 95 31 32 42 35 .50 35 .41 1 .4 0 .9

 Oriska city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 128 103 63 57 48 0 .28 0 .28 421 .4 225 .0

 Oriska township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 72 128 30 30 48 35 .17 35 .08 1 .9 0 .9

 Pierce township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 91 79 28 32 34 35 .34 35 .17 2 .1 0 .8

 Pillsbury city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 24 31 12 11 18 0 .26 0 .26 46 .2 46 .2

 Potter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 41 90 23 23 40 35 .56 32 .77 1 .0 0 .7

 Raritan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 108 124 48 46 49 35 .99 35 .97 2 .6 1 .3

 Rogers city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 61 69 28 29 33 0 .98 0 .98 46 .9 28 .6
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 11

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Barnes County—Con .

 Rogers township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 42 44 17 21 27 34 .92 34 .73 1 .2 0 .5

 Rosebud township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 68 65 30 30 31 35 .01 34 .93 1 .6 0 .9

 Sanborn city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 194 164 80 80 80 0 .55 0 .55 349 .1 145 .5

 Sibley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 46 41 50 59 53 0 .04 0 .04 750 .0 1,250 .0

 Sibley Trail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 85 78 113 85 82 36 .16 33 .96 2 .7 3 .3

 Skandia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 54 67 25 26 29 35 .89 35 .17 1 .1 0 .7

 Spring Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 74 85 84 46 48 47 35 .52 35 .49 2 .1 1 .3

 Springvale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 60 82 23 24 30 35 .90 35 .90 1 .5 0 .6

 Stewart township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 124 88 44 44 42 36 .14 36 .14 2 .5 1 .2

 Svea township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 43 67 25 23 33 35 .88 35 .88 1 .1 0 .7

 Thordenskjold township . . . . . . . . . . 67 79 95 30 40 43 35 .63 35 .62 1 .9 0 .8

 Tower City city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – 1 1 2 0 .62 0 .62 – 1 .6

 Uxbridge township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 111 106 37 34 44 35 .92 35 .13 2 .5 1 .1

 Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 536 565 539 210 195 179 32 .68 32 .65 16 .4 6 .4

 Valley City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,585 6,826 7,163 3,307 3,250 3,222 3 .46 3 .46 1,903 .2 955 .8

 Weimer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 53 72 24 24 27 36 .03 36 .03 1 .3 0 .7

 Wimbledon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 237 275 119 126 140 0 .53 0 .53 407 .5 224 .5

Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,660 6,964 7,198 2,950 2,932 3,163 1,439 .50 1,388 .71 4 .8 2 .1

 Albert township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 61 81 29 28 36 35 .91 35 .57 1 .4 0 .8

 Arne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 51 57 24 27 32 35 .89 35 .38 1 .2 0 .7

 Aurora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 28 35 18 17 24 36 .03 35 .80 0 .9 0 .5

 Beaver township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 39 35 16 16 17 35 .79 32 .93 0 .8 0 .5

 Brinsmade city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 29 21 20 24 17 0 .23 0 .23 152 .2 87 .0

 Broe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 43 55 22 25 32 36 .04 35 .50 1 .0 0 .6

 Butte Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 87 113 37 42 55 35 .95 35 .31 1 .6 1 .0

 East Fork township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 36 49 15 17 19 35 .95 35 .91 1 .0 0 .4

 Eldon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 53 70 23 27 32 36 .07 35 .99 1 .0 0 .6

 Esmond city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 159 196 106 114 126 0 .46 0 .46 217 .4 230 .4

 Esmond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 50 73 24 27 35 35 .61 34 .76 1 .1 0 .7

 Fort Totten UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,638 1,614 1,359 425 421 431 35 .12 32 .30 50 .7 13 .2

 Fort Totten CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,243 952 867 295 255 241 8 .84 8 .60 144 .5 34 .3

 Hesper township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 83 86 31 38 41 36 .09 35 .39 1 .6 0 .9

 Impark township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 40 65 20 30 37 36 .00 31 .68 0 .9 0 .6

 Iowa township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 33 30 10 10 9 35 .89 33 .57 0 .7 0 .3

 Irvine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 24 43 12 14 28 36 .60 35 .89 0 .4 0 .3

 Isabel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 70 40 33 33 40 36 .10 35 .50 1 .3 0 .9

 Knox city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 59 45 26 28 25 0 .50 0 .50 50 .0 52 .0

 Knox township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 36 55 15 16 22 36 .39 35 .79 0 .8 0 .4

 Lake Ibsen township . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 39 35 14 18 23 35 .91 33 .65 0 .7 0 .4

 Lallie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 453 364 295 119 106 91 54 .41 48 .97 9 .3 2 .4

 Lallie North UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 20 16 15 7 9 28 .53 24 .60 1 .6 0 .6

 Leeds city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427 464 542 266 282 302 0 .45 0 .45 948 .9 591 .1

 Leeds township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 83 86 40 38 41 36 .36 35 .70 2 .5 1 .1

 Lohnes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 14 26 71 12 18 21 .71 19 .96 1 .8 3 .6

 McClellan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 34 69 21 24 28 35 .96 35 .82 1 .3 0 .6

 Maddock city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 498 559 253 276 298 0 .89 0 .89 429 .2 284 .3

 Minco township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 22 44 15 11 16 29 .01 28 .55 0 .7 0 .5

 Minnewaukan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 318 401 178 199 203 0 .27 0 .27 829 .6 659 .3

 Mission township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,087 1,077 1,044 321 300 300 44 .76 39 .96 27 .2 8 .0

 Normania township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 56 63 22 25 31 35 .89 34 .40 1 .3 0 .6

 North Viking township . . . . . . . . . . . 59 70 82 32 32 37 35 .16 35 .01 1 .7 0 .9

 Oberon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 81 103 58 46 64 0 .34 0 .34 308 .8 170 .6

 Oberon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 91 87 41 42 42 57 .91 57 .39 1 .2 0 .7

 Pleasant Lake township . . . . . . . . . . 74 80 73 31 30 30 36 .58 34 .05 2 .2 0 .9

 Rich Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 46 59 19 27 26 36 .06 35 .98 1 .1 0 .5

 Riggin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 63 78 23 27 39 47 .87 46 .59 1 .0 0 .5

 Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 39 55 17 17 24 36 .44 36 .12 0 .8 0 .5

 South Viking township . . . . . . . . . . . 61 69 74 27 32 35 35 .83 35 .60 1 .7 0 .8

 Twin Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 43 63 23 25 23 35 .98 33 .87 1 .2 0 .7

 Twin Tree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 50 66 51 19 22 36 .55 36 .34 3 .9 1 .4

 Warwick city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 75 80 32 47 49 1 .00 0 .65 100 .0 49 .2

 Warwick township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 78 45 22 23 35 35 .06 32 .96 1 .9 0 .7

 West Antelope township . . . . . . . . . . 21 33 44 16 17 21 35 .91 35 .80 0 .6 0 .4

 West Bay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 60 83 30 31 34 35 .50 35 .29 1 .6 0 .9

 Wood Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 522 440 391 242 207 206 36 .01 34 .79 15 .0 7 .0

 York city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 26 35 23 32 35 0 .23 0 .23 100 .0 100 .0

 York township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 36 39 22 26 23 36 .30 36 .03 0 .7 0 .6
12 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 888 1,108 484 529 533 1,153 .48 1,148 .85 0 .7 0 .4

 Medora city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 100 101 102 117 77 0 .37 0 .36 311 .1 283 .3

 North Billings UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467 545 729 252 267 291 809 .00 806 .15 0 .6 0 .3

 South Billings UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 243 278 130 145 165 344 .10 342 .35 0 .6 0 .4

Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,429 7,149 8,011 4,341 4,409 4,661 1,697 .35 1,668 .42 3 .9 2 .6

 Amity township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 35 47 19 19 22 36 .09 36 .00 0 .9 0 .5

 Antler city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 47 74 29 44 55 0 .16 0 .16 168 .8 181 .3

 Antler township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 78 83 37 43 41 43 .58 43 .56 1 .3 0 .8

 Bentinck township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 32 52 14 17 25 35 .96 35 .71 0 .7 0 .4

 Blaine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 30 37 11 11 14 35 .91 35 .89 0 .7 0 .3

 Bottineau city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,211 2,336 2,598 1,085 1,114 1,164 1 .09 1 .09 2,028 .4 995 .4

 Brander township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 60 53 22 21 30 35 .99 35 .73 1 .5 0 .6

 Cecil township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 28 36 14 15 19 35 .41 35 .25 0 .5 0 .4

 Chatfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 45 61 22 22 27 35 .94 35 .88 1 .2 0 .6

 Cordelia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 119 110 48 48 48 35 .75 34 .60 2 .8 1 .4

 Cut Bank township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 56 81 23 32 35 35 .93 35 .90 1 .0 0 .6

 Dalen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 111 131 58 59 83 43 .84 42 .82 2 .7 1 .4

 Eidsvold township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 38 63 28 37 46 59 .56 58 .66 0 .6 0 .5

 Elms township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 54 58 25 22 27 35 .96 35 .95 1 .6 0 .7

 Elysian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 37 62 18 20 27 35 .85 35 .78 0 .9 0 .5

 Gardena city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 38 41 21 21 28 0 .32 0 .32 90 .6 65 .6

 Haram township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 85 92 38 44 42 43 .61 43 .55 1 .7 0 .9

 Hastings township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 55 74 24 31 38 35 .86 35 .80 1 .3 0 .7

 Hoffman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 19 14 8 8 7 35 .85 35 .72 0 .5 0 .2

 Homen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 122 129 152 112 126 44 .52 38 .71 3 .0 3 .9

 Kane township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 71 92 31 35 36 32 .84 31 .55 1 .8 1 .0

 Kramer city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 44 51 41 43 46 0 .15 0 .15 193 .3 273 .3

 Landa city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 28 38 22 28 29 0 .08 0 .08 475 .0 275 .0

 Lansford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 245 253 249 128 131 130 0 .35 0 .35 700 .0 365 .7

 Lansford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 63 65 28 28 28 35 .54 35 .51 2 .1 0 .8

 Lewis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 39 45 15 19 21 35 .95 35 .95 0 .9 0 .4

 Lordsburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 22 32 12 12 19 36 .17 35 .34 0 .5 0 .3

 Maxbass city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 91 123 61 70 77 0 .17 0 .17 494 .1 358 .8

 Mount Rose township . . . . . . . . . . . 59 64 65 29 28 27 36 .01 36 .01 1 .6 0 .8

 Newborg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 30 54 20 12 25 35 .98 35 .58 1 .2 0 .6

 Newburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 88 104 62 64 66 0 .13 0 .13 846 .2 476 .9

 Oak Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 26 41 16 22 23 35 .44 35 .44 0 .7 0 .5

 Oak Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 62 62 29 30 32 36 .10 36 .02 1 .4 0 .8

 Ostby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 65 73 28 31 32 35 .48 35 .45 1 .3 0 .8

 Overly city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 19 25 11 10 13 0 .36 0 .36 50 .0 30 .6

 Peabody township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 16 12 8 8 10 36 .05 35 .60 0 .5 0 .2

 Pickering township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 193 213 218 84 89 89 35 .57 35 .56 5 .4 2 .4

 Renville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 32 36 16 18 24 35 .96 35 .89 0 .9 0 .4

 Richburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 49 98 25 29 36 45 .39 43 .32 0 .9 0 .6

 Roland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 538 545 426 1,075 1,007 961 43 .94 38 .12 14 .1 28 .2

 Scandia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 54 88 39 44 48 43 .86 43 .86 1 .0 0 .9

 Scotia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 64 89 32 39 42 41 .32 40 .18 1 .2 0 .8

 Sergius township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 79 91 33 38 38 48 .75 47 .76 1 .1 0 .7

 Sherman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 69 76 31 33 35 35 .92 35 .91 1 .9 0 .9

 Souris city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 83 97 45 46 57 0 .10 0 .10 580 .0 450 .0

 Starbuck township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 38 29 21 19 22 40 .49 39 .25 0 .8 0 .5

 Stone Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 19 28 32 16 15 17 28 .25 27 .84 0 .7 0 .6

 Tacoma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 94 93 42 40 40 42 .03 39 .39 1 .5 1 .1

 Wayne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 27 36 16 15 18 43 .81 43 .52 0 .7 0 .4

 Wellington township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 58 53 23 24 24 36 .07 35 .99 0 .8 0 .6

 Westhope city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 578 218 268 246 0 .33 0 .33 1,300 .0 660 .6

 Wheaton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 58 65 24 36 36 43 .63 43 .37 1 .3 0 .6

 Whitby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 17 27 7 8 10 36 .27 36 .27 0 .2 0 .2

 Whitteron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 447 511 219 169 203 35 .13 34 .66 11 .7 6 .3

 Willow City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 221 281 123 143 172 0 .45 0 .45 362 .2 273 .3

 Willow Vale township . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 34 46 15 18 21 36 .11 35 .90 0 .7 0 .4

Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,151 3,242 3,596 1,683 1,596 1,691 1,167 .05 1,161 .81 2 .7 1 .4

 Adelaide township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 31 37 14 12 12 35 .70 35 .67 0 .8 0 .4

 Amor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 28 11 12 17 35 .88 35 .85 0 .4 0 .3

 Bowman city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,650 1,600 1,741 867 799 837 1 .53 1 .53 1,078 .4 566 .7
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 13

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Bowman County—Con .

 Bowman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 257 269 278 119 107 109 34 .32 34 .24 7 .5 3 .5

 Boyesen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 20 42 9 9 14 35 .93 35 .82 0 .6 0 .3

 Buena Vista township . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 31 39 12 13 16 30 .57 30 .57 0 .7 0 .4

 Fischbein township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 20 27 12 14 18 35 .41 35 .11 0 .4 0 .3

 Gascoyne city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 22 10 15 12 1 .00 1 .00 16 .0 10 .0

 Gascoyne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 20 25 12 16 12 35 .54 35 .48 0 .4 0 .3

 Gem township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 19 27 12 8 9 35 .94 35 .85 0 .6 0 .3

 Goldfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 31 42 26 25 21 36 .02 36 .01 1 .0 0 .7

 Grainbelt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 50 42 15 18 17 30 .58 30 .57 0 .8 0 .5

 Grand River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 27 36 8 7 11 35 .93 35 .92 0 .3 0 .2

 Haley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 23 28 24 19 21 36 .01 35 .97 0 .6 0 .7

 Hart UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 27 18 11 11 13 35 .88 35 .85 0 .7 0 .3

 Ladd township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 26 34 11 11 12 36 .03 36 .03 0 .4 0 .3

 Langberg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 16 42 9 8 15 35 .90 35 .84 0 .4 0 .3

 Marion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 21 15 11 11 7 30 .72 30 .53 0 .6 0 .4

 Minnehaha township . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 22 30 12 9 15 36 .01 32 .90 0 .7 0 .4

 Nebo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 40 44 17 18 17 35 .88 35 .86 0 .7 0 .5

 Rhame city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 189 186 107 117 105 1 .50 1 .50 112 .7 71 .3

 Rhame township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 32 43 14 13 19 29 .17 29 .06 0 .9 0 .5

 Scranton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 304 294 147 139 155 0 .90 0 .90 312 .2 163 .3

 Scranton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 73 130 34 36 52 35 .01 34 .92 1 .9 1 .0

 Star township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 38 43 17 15 17 30 .61 30 .50 1 .6 0 .6

 Stillwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 32 38 14 15 17 30 .60 30 .59 0 .9 0 .5

 Sunny Slope township . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10 8 6 7 6 51 .23 51 .12 0 .2 0 .1

 Talbot township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 80 98 45 38 40 35 .85 35 .82 2 .9 1 .3

 West Bowman UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 106 107 57 54 50 285 .45 284 .93 0 .4 0 .2

 Whiting township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 39 52 20 20 25 35 .94 35 .87 0 .9 0 .6

Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,968 2,242 3,002 1,340 1,412 1,691 1,128 .92 1,103 .57 1 .8 1 .2

 Battleview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 88 138 51 48 51 35 .88 35 .58 2 .2 1 .4

 Bowbells city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 406 498 223 214 258 0 .80 0 .80 420 .0 278 .8

 Bowbells township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 43 57 22 22 29 35 .46 35 .11 1 .2 0 .6

 Carter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 14 20 11 9 14 35 .92 35 .12 0 .4 0 .3

 Clayton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 33 34 14 15 15 36 .06 35 .44 1 .0 0 .4

 Cleary township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 42 47 17 16 21 35 .97 35 .30 1 .0 0 .5

 Columbus city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 151 223 130 142 160 0 .27 0 .27 492 .6 481 .5

 Colville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 70 59 35 32 38 34 .62 33 .26 2 .0 1 .1

 Dale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 30 37 17 19 27 36 .08 35 .47 0 .8 0 .5

 Dimond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 15 29 9 8 17 35 .70 32 .83 0 .5 0 .3

 Fay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 26 43 14 17 20 35 .89 35 .85 0 .6 0 .4

 Flaxton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 73 121 69 77 99 0 .28 0 .28 235 .7 246 .4

 Foothills township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 27 58 19 21 24 35 .98 35 .18 0 .6 0 .5

 Forthun township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 11 21 12 13 17 43 .28 43 .22 0 .3 0 .3

 Garness township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 69 75 27 29 34 35 .97 35 .73 1 .1 0 .8

 Harmonious township . . . . . . . . . . . 20 24 39 20 18 21 36 .03 35 .49 0 .6 0 .6

 Kandiyohi township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 27 30 15 10 14 35 .90 33 .22 1 .2 0 .5

 Keller township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 35 33 27 13 13 36 .05 35 .80 0 .9 0 .8

 Larson CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) 0 .41 0 .41 29 .3 34 .1

 Lakeview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 13 15 12 9 15 51 .56 49 .66 0 .3 0 .2

 Leaf Mountain township . . . . . . . . . . 21 34 34 19 26 26 35 .99 34 .78 0 .6 0 .5

 Lignite city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 174 242 96 111 126 0 .14 0 .14 1,107 .1 685 .7

 Lucy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 15 36 16 12 18 36 .09 34 .39 0 .8 0 .5

 Minnesota township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 23 35 17 14 24 53 .45 52 .47 0 .4 0 .3

 North Burke UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3 4 2 2 4 12 .39 11 .58 0 .3 0 .2

 North Star township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 48 62 23 29 37 40 .47 39 .93 0 .9 0 .6

 Portal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 131 192 80 98 104 0 .56 0 .56 225 .0 142 .9

 Portal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 42 47 19 24 30 42 .77 42 .58 0 .6 0 .4

 Powers Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 309 408 172 183 221 1 .23 0 .99 282 .8 173 .7

 Richland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 24 36 17 20 24 42 .79 42 .59 0 .4 0 .4

 Roseland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 30 32 15 18 19 35 .91 35 .73 0 .7 0 .4

 Short Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 37 37 65 28 29 36 43 .03 42 .78 0 .9 0 .7

 Soo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 27 47 18 19 24 42 .98 42 .68 0 .6 0 .4

 Thorson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 34 32 18 18 19 35 .91 35 .55 0 .7 0 .5

 Vale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 21 28 13 15 17 35 .72 34 .76 0 .7 0 .4

 Vanville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 30 34 13 14 17 35 .77 33 .40 0 .6 0 .4

 Ward township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 46 65 30 35 45 36 .00 35 .04 1 .5 0 .9
14 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,308 69,416 60,131 35,754 r 29,004 23,803 1,668 .30 1,632 .65 49 .8 21 .9

 Apple Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 2,652 1,243 1,039 955 484 347 34 .90 34 .85 76 .1 27 .4

 Bismarck city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,272 r 55,392 49,272 28,648 r 24,218 20,047 31 .23 30 .84 1,986 .8 928 .9

 Boyd township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 136 96 55 49 39 35 .99 35 .99 3 .7 1 .5

 Burnt Creek-Riverview UT . . . . . . . . 2,254 1,306 754 815 458 251 58 .93 58 .01 38 .9 14 .0

 Canfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 15 24 9 10 10 35 .94 35 .51 0 .3 0 .3

 Christiania township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 35 47 18 18 20 36 .00 35 .97 1 .0 0 .5

 Clear Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 30 31 14 13 19 36 .10 35 .91 1 .0 0 .4

 Crofte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199 139 152 74 57 62 36 .16 36 .16 5 .5 2 .0

 Cromwell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 27 35 15 14 14 36 .21 36 .21 1 .0 0 .4

 Driscoll township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 163 177 79 81 81 36 .05 35 .93 4 .6 2 .2

 Driscoll CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 (X) (X) 44 (X) (X) 0 .58 0 .58 141 .4 75 .9

 Ecklund township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 105 124 58 53 59 53 .93 53 .93 1 .9 1 .1

 Estherville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 28 33 21 18 23 35 .49 35 .49 0 .9 0 .6

 Florence Lake township . . . . . . . . . . 9 14 25 6 9 8 34 .96 32 .10 0 .3 0 .2

 Francis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 28 39 14 14 15 35 .83 35 .83 0 .7 0 .4

 Ghylin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 36 39 21 20 24 35 .65 35 .65 1 .2 0 .6

 Gibbs township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,858 981 739 671 339 233 35 .01 34 .99 53 .1 19 .2

 Glenview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 148 160 88 59 62 39 .35 38 .73 5 .6 2 .3

 Grass Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 74 67 35 29 30 36 .03 35 .46 1 .9 1 .0

 Harriet-Lien township . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 74 (X) 34 33 (X) 71 .92 68 .95 1 .0 0 .5

 Hay Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,057 2,650 1,908 1,339 866 681 28 .15 27 .41 148 .0 48 .9

 Hazel Grove township . . . . . . . . . . . 15 18 23 11 10 10 34 .95 34 .13 0 .4 0 .3

 Lincoln city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,406 1,730 1,132 836 541 346 1 .12 1 .12 2,148 .2 746 .4

 Lincoln-Fort Rice UT . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,850 r 3,179 2,259 1,033 753 532 28 .67 26 .42 145 .7 39 .1

 Logan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 47 47 18 17 24 36 .03 35 .82 1 .0 0 .5

 Long Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 109 100 58 46 64 36 .03 32 .25 3 .2 1 .8

 Lyman UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 15 (X) 7 7 (X) 36 .13 35 .97 0 .3 0 .2

 McKenzie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 83 85 49 36 49 35 .92 35 .86 2 .5 1 .4

 Menoken township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 147 137 70 63 56 35 .93 35 .87 4 .3 2 .0

 Menoken CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 (X) (X) 31 (X) (X) 2 .24 2 .18 32 .1 14 .2

 Missouri township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168 132 86 59 50 31 29 .36 23 .63 7 .1 2 .5

 Morton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 50 45 21 19 22 35 .98 35 .96 1 .2 0 .6

 Naughton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 141 144 68 49 44 35 .98 35 .98 4 .4 1 .9

 Painted Woods township . . . . . . . . . 118 111 110 56 45 46 37 .65 36 .32 3 .2 1 .5

 Phoenix UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 20 8 9 10 35 .92 34 .82 0 .5 0 .2

 Regan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 43 51 31 32 29 1 .01 1 .01 42 .6 30 .7

 Richmond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 39 45 17 19 23 36 .09 35 .00 0 .9 0 .5

 Rock Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 30 44 19 20 20 36 .11 36 .11 0 .7 0 .5

 Schrunk township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 26 29 10 11 11 34 .43 32 .71 0 .6 0 .3

 Sibley Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 26 31 12 13 15 36 .00 35 .99 0 .4 0 .3

 Steiber township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 18 29 14 12 13 34 .27 34 .17 0 .7 0 .4

 Sterling township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149 172 183 80 87 84 35 .93 35 .93 4 .1 2 .2

 Taft township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 50 33 15 20 21 35 .95 35 .81 0 .9 0 .4

 Telfer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 64 61 28 30 23 36 .08 36 .02 2 .1 0 .8

 Thelma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 19 27 10 10 9 36 .10 34 .16 0 .5 0 .3

 Trygg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 47 44 17 18 16 36 .03 36 .03 1 .1 0 .5

 Wild Rose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 23 31 8 9 14 36 .01 31 .72 0 .6 0 .3

 Wilson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 50 49 25 26 27 34 .49 33 .67 1 .2 0 .7

 Wilton city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 242 176 103 106 81 0 .26 0 .25 644 .0 412 .0

 Wing city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 124 208 90 89 97 0 .59 0 .59 257 .6 152 .5

 Wing township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 34 33 12 15 13 35 .43 35 .42 0 .8 0 .3

Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 149,778 123,138 102,874 67,938 53,790 42,407 1,767 .90 1,764 .94 84 .9 38 .5

 Addison township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 104 95 40 38 38 35 .97 35 .97 2 .5 1 .1

 Alice city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 56 62 21 25 30 0 .96 0 .96 41 .7 21 .9

 Amenia city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 89 82 38 35 31 1 .43 1 .43 65 .7 26 .6

 Amenia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 112 132 49 42 48 34 .63 34 .62 3 .0 1 .4

 Argusville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475 147 161 152 65 56 4 .01 4 .01 118 .5 37 .9

 Arthur city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337 402 400 144 140 133 1 .52 1 .52 221 .7 94 .7

 Arthur township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 82 71 29 31 33 34 .54 34 .54 2 .3 0 .8

 Ayr city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 19 10 13 14 0 .08 0 .08 212 .5 125 .0

 Ayr township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 78 78 35 37 39 36 .02 36 .02 2 .0 1 .0

 Barnes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 525 289 13 173 96 0 .99 0 .97 25 .8 13 .4

 Bell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 41 52 18 18 19 35 .91 35 .91 1 .0 0 .5

 Berlin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 136 133 48 51 46 34 .19 34 .19 3 .6 1 .4

 Briarwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 78 88 28 26 27 0 .15 0 .15 486 .7 186 .7
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 15

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Cass County—Con .

 Buffalo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 209 204 101 105 108 0 .23 0 .23 817 .4 439 .1

 Buffalo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 79 77 35 31 31 35 .94 35 .90 2 .3 1 .0

 Casselton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,329 1,855 1,601 926 738 664 1 .90 1 .87 1,245 .5 495 .2

 Casselton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 117 111 32 55 36 33 .87 33 .87 2 .3 0 .9

 Clifton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 71 78 30 29 38 35 .36 35 .14 2 .1 0 .9

 Cornell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 60 90 24 25 28 36 .10 36 .10 1 .6 0 .7

 Davenport city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 261 218 96 92 78 0 .27 0 .27 933 .3 355 .6

 Davenport township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 134 131 59 52 56 35 .92 35 .92 4 .0 1 .6

 Dows township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 63 76 20 22 28 36 .01 36 .01 1 .2 0 .6

 Durbin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 92 106 42 39 39 35 .12 35 .07 2 .4 1 .2

 Eldred township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 91 115 47 44 51 35 .44 35 .29 3 .0 1 .3

 Embden CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 43 (X) (X) 19 (X) (X) 0 .29 0 .29 148 .3 65 .5

 Empire township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 109 124 51 50 49 35 .94 35 .93 3 .2 1 .4

 Enderlin city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 17 3 2 5 0 .03 0 .03 133 .3 100 .0

 Erie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 134 135 52 61 60 36 .03 35 .85 3 .0 1 .5

 Erie CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 65 (X) 26 35 (X) 2 .01 2 .01 24 .9 12 .9

 Everest township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 98 126 45 43 50 35 .13 35 .13 2 .5 1 .3

 Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 90,599 74,084 49,956 41,200 31,704 48 .82 48 .82 2,162 .0 1,023 .3

 Fargo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 – 3 2 – 0 .10 0 .10 40 .0 30 .0

 Frontier city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 273 218 76 78 57 0 .19 0 .19 1,126 .3 400 .0

 Gardner city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 80 85 35 39 42 0 .50 0 .50 148 .0 70 .0

 Gardner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 123 115 46 48 44 35 .60 35 .60 3 .0 1 .3

 Gill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 104 115 43 39 41 36 .01 35 .96 3 .3 1 .2

 Grandin city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 173 181 213 77 80 77 0 .15 0 .15 1,153 .3 513 .3

 Gunkel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 55 72 22 22 26 36 .18 36 .18 1 .2 0 .6

 Harmony township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 93 93 32 40 38 34 .53 34 .43 2 .4 0 .9

 Harwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 718 607 590 248 201 172 1 .27 1 .26 569 .8 196 .8

 Harwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 352 291 322 130 104 108 31 .01 30 .98 11 .4 4 .2

 Brooktree Park CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 80 (X) (X) 29 (X) (X) 0 .18 0 .18 444 .4 161 .1

 Highland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 116 144 44 44 49 35 .93 35 .74 2 .6 1 .2

 Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 51 64 26 28 26 35 .86 35 .86 1 .5 0 .7

 Horace city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,430 915 662 826 311 216 10 .77 10 .77 225 .6 76 .7

 Howes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 82 99 32 31 36 35 .82 35 .70 2 .2 0 .9

 Embden CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 16 (X) (X) 7 (X) (X) 0 .43 0 .43 37 .2 16 .3

 Hunter city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 261 326 341 138 160 168 1 .53 1 .51 172 .8 91 .4

 Hunter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 86 95 36 38 39 34 .38 34 .32 1 .9 1 .0

 Kindred city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 692 614 569 289 267 246 1 .45 1 .45 477 .2 199 .3

 Kinyon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 103 100 41 39 36 36 .02 36 .02 2 .5 1 .1

 Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 47 59 18 19 23 36 .05 35 .99 0 .9 0 .5

 Leonard city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 255 310 121 124 137 0 .75 0 .75 297 .3 161 .3

 Leonard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 103 121 42 40 44 35 .23 35 .23 3 .1 1 .2

 Maple River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 126 125 55 53 56 35 .69 35 .65 3 .6 1 .5

 Mapleton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 762 606 682 264 193 203 4 .00 4 .00 190 .5 66 .0

 Mapleton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 251 269 71 88 96 34 .02 33 .87 5 .6 2 .1

 Noble township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 89 99 40 35 38 31 .40 31 .40 2 .4 1 .3

 Normanna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 333 339 340 128 122 124 34 .47 34 .47 9 .7 3 .7

 North River city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 65 68 24 19 20 0 .07 0 .06 933 .3 400 .0

 Oxbow city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 248 100 108 84 40 0 .42 0 .42 726 .2 257 .1

 Page city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 225 266 121 125 144 0 .18 0 .18 1,288 .9 672 .2

 Page township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 60 59 21 26 26 35 .82 35 .80 1 .5 0 .6

 Pleasant township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468 426 354 185 156 120 36 .68 36 .62 12 .8 5 .1

 Pontiac township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 100 108 47 42 50 35 .92 35 .12 2 .8 1 .3

 Prairie Rose city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 68 78 26 20 23 0 .04 0 .04 1,825 .0 650 .0

 Raymond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 254 270 284 101 98 91 34 .43 34 .36 7 .4 2 .9

 Reed township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,175 1,224 1,046 414 384 346 20 .37 20 .26 58 .0 20 .4

 Reile’s Acres city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513 254 210 147 72 56 0 .48 0 .48 1,068 .8 306 .3

 Rich township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 79 81 28 31 33 36 .14 36 .10 1 .8 0 .8

 Rochester township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 70 46 25 27 29 36 .06 36 .06 1 .5 0 .7

 Rush River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 107 107 40 42 48 36 .43 36 .42 2 .3 1 .1

 Stanley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,218 2,296 1,933 454 769 611 25 .26 25 .26 48 .2 18 .0

 Tower township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 67 66 24 25 26 34 .56 34 .56 1 .6 0 .7

 Tower City city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 252 233 114 112 115 1 .46 1 .46 173 .3 78 .1

 Walburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 175 188 65 74 79 35 .98 35 .98 4 .2 1 .8

 Warren township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 133 133 55 51 48 35 .65 35 .65 3 .9 1 .5

 Watson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 90 123 42 44 46 35 .99 35 .99 2 .6 1 .2

 West Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,830 14,940 12,287 10,760 5,968 4,574 14 .71 14 .44 1,788 .8 745 .2

 Wheatland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 147 153 68 62 68 36 .12 36 .11 4 .4 1 .9

 Wheatland CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 60 (X) 33 28 (X) 4 .01 4 .01 17 .0 8 .2

 Wiser township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 70 93 42 32 37 33 .68 33 .68 2 .6 1 .2
16 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,993 4,831 6,064 2,309 2,725 3,038 1,509 .96 1,488 .75 2 .7 1 .6

 Alma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 37 62 20 25 27 35 .76 35 .67 0 .8 0 .6

 Alsen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 68 113 28 45 67 29 .89 29 .36 1 .2 1 .0

 Banner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 43 58 17 18 27 29 .90 29 .07 1 .0 0 .6

 Billings township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 26 37 13 11 12 28 .48 28 .21 0 .5 0 .5

 Bruce township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 31 56 14 21 27 36 .10 35 .30 0 .5 0 .4

 Byron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 22 46 18 22 29 44 .97 44 .44 0 .6 0 .4

 Calio city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 24 43 13 17 20 8 .89 8 .15 2 .7 1 .6

 Calvin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 27 10 19 22 0 .22 0 .22 90 .9 45 .5

 Cypress township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 53 89 22 27 34 44 .45 44 .40 0 .9 0 .5

 Dresden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 50 74 19 25 29 44 .70 43 .87 0 .9 0 .4

 Easby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 52 48 19 23 33 36 .05 35 .82 1 .1 0 .5

 East Alma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 26 35 17 15 23 35 .96 35 .93 0 .6 0 .5

 Elgin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 232 310 98 97 111 34 .50 34 .23 7 .1 2 .9

 Fremont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 69 110 36 39 49 55 .48 55 .41 1 .0 0 .6

 Glenila township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 29 34 10 16 23 35 .88 35 .75 0 .4 0 .3

 Gordon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 19 31 11 14 24 27 .04 26 .64 0 .4 0 .4

 Grey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 22 46 13 19 23 36 .12 35 .50 0 .6 0 .4

 Hannah city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 20 49 14 24 49 0 .19 0 .19 78 .9 73 .7

 Harvey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 36 79 25 27 30 35 .91 35 .76 0 .9 0 .7

 Hay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 53 67 23 26 34 35 .96 35 .86 1 .0 0 .6

 Henderson township . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 54 63 18 20 24 29 .15 27 .92 1 .4 0 .6

 Hope township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 42 63 19 23 31 29 .75 29 .62 0 .8 0 .6

 Huron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 34 48 15 20 24 36 .08 35 .68 0 .7 0 .4

 Langdon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,878 2,101 2,241 1,057 1,178 1,109 1 .68 1 .65 1,138 .2 640 .6

 Langdon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 38 54 15 22 26 36 .13 35 .96 0 .8 0 .4

 Linden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 31 46 12 18 23 44 .44 42 .62 0 .6 0 .3

 Loam township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 47 58 19 27 35 34 .42 34 .34 1 .2 0 .6

 Loma city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 21 27 13 10 13 26 .83 26 .43 0 .6 0 .5

 Manilla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 112 172 39 45 62 36 .04 35 .73 2 .3 1 .1

 Milton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 85 133 40 60 81 0 .51 0 .51 113 .7 78 .4

 Minto township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 34 45 11 19 22 35 .83 34 .92 0 .7 0 .3

 Montrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 72 75 32 40 51 35 .31 35 .26 1 .2 0 .9

 Moscow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 31 46 12 23 30 36 .00 34 .99 0 .5 0 .3

 Mount Carmel township . . . . . . . . . . 41 78 104 26 48 52 45 .03 44 .35 0 .9 0 .6

 Munich city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 268 310 116 124 135 1 .44 1 .43 146 .9 81 .1

 Nekoma city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 51 63 36 41 51 0 .36 0 .36 138 .9 100 .0

 Nekoma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 47 53 17 20 27 35 .62 35 .15 0 .7 0 .5

 North Loma township . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 19 34 6 10 11 18 .24 18 .09 0 .5 0 .3

 North Olga township . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 52 75 28 32 40 41 .70 41 .68 0 .9 0 .7

 Osford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 47 55 25 26 36 35 .85 35 .80 1 .3 0 .7

 Osnabrock city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 174 214 73 85 90 0 .30 0 .30 446 .7 243 .3

 Osnabrock township . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 48 51 22 24 30 35 .94 35 .50 1 .0 0 .6

 Perry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 47 72 25 26 30 36 .04 35 .83 1 .3 0 .7

 Sarles city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 22 83 26 42 55 0 .19 0 .19 126 .3 136 .8

 Seivert township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 25 31 9 14 15 29 .93 28 .06 0 .5 0 .3

 South Dresden township . . . . . . . . . 33 43 67 20 29 35 35 .91 35 .37 0 .9 0 .6

 South Olga township . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 52 77 27 33 35 35 .88 35 .80 1 .1 0 .8

 Storlie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 20 30 10 11 16 25 .44 25 .10 0 .8 0 .4

 Trier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 51 67 22 24 25 32 .27 30 .35 1 .6 0 .7

 Wales city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 30 48 20 31 43 0 .24 0 .23 134 .8 87 .0

 Waterloo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 58 65 17 21 34 35 .98 35 .34 1 .0 0 .5

 West Hope township . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 57 78 42 48 53 44 .98 44 .39 1 .0 0 .9

Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,289 5,757 6,107 2,636 2,656 2,763 1,142 .13 1,131 .47 4 .7 2 .3

 Ada township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 60 54 23 23 30 35 .98 35 .98 1 .4 0 .6

 Albertha township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 20 33 11 12 13 35 .98 33 .66 0 .7 0 .3

 Albion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 51 59 18 20 24 36 .17 36 .06 1 .2 0 .5

 Bear Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 184 181 74 70 68 30 .11 30 .01 6 .1 2 .5

 Clement township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 107 126 48 47 54 45 .66 45 .28 2 .4 1 .1

 Divide township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 89 81 36 31 34 35 .36 35 .13 2 .2 1 .0

 Elden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 83 79 36 36 39 36 .16 36 .16 2 .0 1 .0

 Ellendale city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,394 1,559 1,798 698 750 765 1 .52 1 .52 917 .1 459 .2

 Ellendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 115 136 53 54 62 34 .55 34 .49 3 .3 1 .5

 Elm township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 78 76 65 60 74 36 .14 35 .87 2 .1 1 .8

 Forbes city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 64 72 41 39 44 0 .25 0 .25 212 .0 164 .0

 Fullerton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 85 94 39 39 41 0 .39 0 .39 138 .5 100 .0
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 17

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Dickey County—Con .

 German township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 46 13 14 19 35 .48 34 .01 0 .5 0 .4

 Grand Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 25 29 38 21 20 22 36 .21 36 .04 0 .7 0 .6

 Hamburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 24 27 16 16 23 36 .23 36 .18 0 .9 0 .4

 Hudson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 77 97 33 33 38 34 .27 33 .94 2 .6 1 .0

 James River Valley township . . . . . . 40 51 50 19 21 24 28 .60 28 .60 1 .4 0 .7

 Kent township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 25 34 15 10 16 35 .91 35 .88 0 .8 0 .4

 Kentner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 167 150 51 43 40 36 .12 36 .11 5 .1 1 .4

 Keystone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 50 51 18 19 22 35 .89 35 .89 1 .2 0 .5

 Lorraine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 52 54 19 21 23 35 .64 35 .61 1 .0 0 .5

 Lovell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 48 69 24 26 35 44 .06 43 .57 1 .0 0 .6

 Ludden city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 29 41 19 18 26 0 .77 0 .77 29 .9 24 .7

 Maple township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 54 75 26 25 29 35 .76 35 .74 1 .4 0 .7

 Monango city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 28 53 22 18 32 0 .37 0 .37 97 .3 59 .5

 Northwest township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 22 37 12 13 18 33 .26 32 .73 0 .6 0 .4

 Oakes city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,856 1,979 1,775 912 908 829 1 .64 1 .64 1,131 .7 556 .1

 Port Emma township . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 68 62 27 27 37 26 .98 26 .49 1 .3 1 .0

 Porter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 51 66 25 27 30 35 .54 35 .27 1 .4 0 .7

 Potsdam township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 39 59 18 22 24 34 .51 34 .47 1 .1 0 .5

 Riverdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 89 87 48 39 38 37 .41 37 .07 2 .6 1 .3

 Spring Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 28 30 31 17 17 18 35 .55 33 .27 0 .8 0 .5

 Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 38 68 22 20 29 35 .33 35 .33 0 .8 0 .6

 Van Meter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 107 119 41 41 48 36 .08 36 .08 2 .1 1 .1

 Whitestone township . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 33 40 13 13 18 36 .52 36 .17 0 .8 0 .4

 Wright township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 76 92 27 28 32 35 .49 35 .29 1 .4 0 .8

 Yorktown township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 41 48 20 19 21 35 .80 35 .80 1 .4 0 .6

 Young township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 32 40 16 17 17 34 .42 34 .35 1 .0 0 .5

Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,071 2,283 2,899 1,324 1,469 1,667 1,294 .23 1,260 .79 1 .6 1 .1

 Alexandria township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 14 27 11 10 17 36 .10 35 .74 0 .4 0 .3

 Ambrose city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 23 48 29 41 47 1 .07 1 .07 24 .3 27 .1

 Ambrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 28 43 21 25 25 42 .36 41 .66 0 .4 0 .5

 Blooming Prairie township . . . . . . . . 50 51 62 25 28 38 43 .27 42 .17 1 .2 0 .6

 Blooming Valley township . . . . . . . . . 47 51 57 20 23 27 36 .09 35 .56 1 .3 0 .6

 Border township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 44 18 19 19 36 .04 35 .22 0 .6 0 .5

 Burg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 36 31 14 17 19 36 .09 35 .63 0 .7 0 .4

 Clinton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 16 19 11 14 16 36 .05 35 .44 0 .4 0 .3

 Coalfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 51 64 27 39 35 35 .65 35 .40 1 .0 0 .8

 Crosby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,070 1,089 1,312 613 637 687 1 .37 1 .37 781 .0 447 .4

 Daneville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 36 52 23 25 28 51 .91 50 .60 0 .7 0 .5

 De Witt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 38 32 14 21 18 42 .30 41 .21 0 .4 0 .3

 Elkhorn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 28 38 15 18 20 62 .47 59 .51 0 .4 0 .3

 Fertile Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 23 25 23 14 20 25 68 .90 64 .69 0 .4 0 .2

 Fillmore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 44 46 28 28 26 42 .01 40 .86 0 .9 0 .7

 Fortuna city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 31 53 26 39 46 1 .01 1 .00 22 .0 26 .0

 Frazier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 23 32 13 13 16 36 .04 35 .05 0 .6 0 .4

 Frederick township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 37 43 16 24 28 35 .90 35 .77 0 .5 0 .4

 Garnet township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 16 28 11 13 23 35 .73 35 .44 0 .6 0 .3

 Gooseneck township . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 39 54 25 26 27 43 .28 42 .46 0 .7 0 .6

 Hawkeye township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 35 48 22 20 24 36 .02 35 .22 0 .9 0 .6

 Hayland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 34 40 16 19 20 35 .95 35 .07 0 .6 0 .5

 Lincoln Valley township . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 39 13 19 18 36 .01 35 .30 0 .6 0 .4

 Long Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 38 49 18 23 29 43 .50 42 .59 0 .9 0 .4

 Mentor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 24 31 15 21 24 43 .24 42 .68 0 .4 0 .4

 Noonan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 154 231 107 116 148 0 .31 0 .30 403 .3 356 .7

 Palmer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 15 17 13 10 10 35 .88 35 .26 0 .5 0 .4

 Plumer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 9 8 4 9 13 36 .05 34 .88 0 .3 0 .1

 Sioux Trail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 32 43 20 21 24 35 .84 35 .64 0 .7 0 .6

 Smoky Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . 34 21 34 17 18 22 35 .95 35 .18 1 .0 0 .5

 Stoneview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 14 24 16 16 23 35 .77 35 .27 0 .6 0 .5

 Troy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 62 68 27 25 31 35 .96 34 .38 1 .3 0 .8

 Twin Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 17 33 13 14 16 36 .05 34 .69 0 .5 0 .4

 Upland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 23 31 13 13 17 36 .05 35 .12 0 .6 0 .4

 Westby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 61 74 31 34 45 51 .87 48 .21 1 .1 0 .6

 Writing Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . 7 16 21 5 11 16 36 .14 35 .13 0 .2 0 .1
18 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,536 3,600 4,005 2,132 1,965 2,057 2,082 .04 2,008 .46 1 .8 1 .1

 Dodge city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 125 135 67 73 74 0 .47 0 .47 185 .1 142 .6

 Dunn Center city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 122 128 80 81 80 0 .39 0 .39 374 .4 205 .1

 Fort Berthold UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 435 402 (X) 496 350 (X) 417 .72 356 .74 1 .2 1 .4

 Halliday city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 227 288 135 155 182 0 .46 0 .46 408 .7 293 .5

 Halliday UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 411 458 847 254 257 469 504 .61 497 .50 0 .8 0 .5

 Killdeer city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 751 713 722 342 351 367 0 .94 0 .94 798 .9 363 .8

 Killdeer UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 917 856 (X) 469 417 (X) 663 .01 658 .95 1 .4 0 .7

 Manning CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) 0 .57 0 .57 129 .8 52 .6

 South Dunn UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601 697 (X) 289 281 (X) 494 .44 493 .03 1 .2 0 .6

Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,385 2,757 2,951 1,323 1,418 1,470 644 .11 630 .17 3 .8 2 .1

 Bush township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 54 58 20 22 27 36 .20 35 .50 1 .1 0 .6

 Cherry Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 33 35 49 16 17 20 34 .94 33 .38 1 .0 0 .5

 Columbia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 44 61 20 22 25 35 .06 34 .93 1 .0 0 .6

 Colvin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 81 64 34 32 37 36 .08 35 .53 1 .7 1 .0

 Eddy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 48 46 20 21 26 36 .46 35 .80 1 .1 0 .6

 Freeborn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 78 91 48 44 56 36 .38 36 .06 2 .8 1 .3

 Gates township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 56 75 26 31 52 35 .86 35 .49 1 .2 0 .7

 Grandfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 41 56 19 20 28 35 .93 35 .84 0 .6 0 .5

 Hillsdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 48 44 21 19 20 36 .41 34 .82 1 .2 0 .6

 Lake Washington township . . . . . . . 27 33 32 13 15 19 35 .92 31 .80 0 .8 0 .4

 Munster township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 80 87 28 31 37 36 .07 35 .91 1 .6 0 .8

 New Rockford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,391 1,463 1,604 750 778 760 1 .54 1 .51 921 .2 496 .7

 New Rockford township . . . . . . . . . . 81 105 88 41 46 45 34 .74 34 .52 2 .3 1 .2

 Paradise township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 43 31 18 18 20 35 .22 32 .98 1 .2 0 .5

 Pleasant Prairie township . . . . . . . . 32 39 57 18 19 28 34 .81 34 .56 0 .9 0 .5

 Rosefield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 58 61 22 24 30 35 .11 34 .96 0 .9 0 .6

 Sheldon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 22 45 16 17 19 36 .08 35 .75 0 .6 0 .4

 Sheyenne city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 318 272 147 187 155 0 .16 0 .16 1,275 .0 918 .8

 Superior township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 68 86 28 34 44 35 .00 34 .73 1 .6 0 .8

 Tiffany township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 43 44 18 21 22 36 .13 35 .94 0 .9 0 .5

Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,550 4,331 4,830 2,085 2,168 2,200 1,555 .02 1,510 .43 2 .4 1 .4

 Braddock city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 43 56 24 27 31 0 .25 0 .25 84 .0 96 .0

 Campbell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 66 83 35 37 43 36 .74 34 .82 1 .9 1 .0

 Hague city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 91 109 51 53 59 0 .27 0 .27 263 .0 188 .9

 Hazelton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 237 240 126 129 126 0 .36 0 .36 652 .8 350 .0

 Linton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,097 1,321 1,410 642 701 684 0 .75 0 .75 1,462 .7 856 .0

 North Emmons UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 832 59 (X) 468 25 (X) 791 .85 774 .33 1 .1 0 .6

 South Emmons UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 820 685 775 515 271 276 724 .50 699 .36 1 .2 0 .7

 Strasburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409 549 553 224 245 241 0 .30 0 .30 1,363 .3 746 .7

Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,343 3,759 3,983 1,801 1,793 1,876 646 .82 635 .45 5 .3 2 .8

 Birtsell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 114 121 43 47 48 35 .88 35 .75 2 .7 1 .2

 Bordulac township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 97 104 40 38 44 35 .90 34 .03 2 .2 1 .2

 Bucephalia township . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 61 63 25 27 29 36 .09 35 .43 1 .2 0 .7

 Carrington city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,065 2,268 2,267 1,057 1,057 1,047 2 .11 2 .11 978 .7 500 .9

 Carrington township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 182 183 80 66 78 34 .38 34 .04 6 .0 2 .4

 Eastman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 39 14 12 20 36 .05 35 .59 0 .5 0 .4

 Estabrook township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 67 72 30 32 30 35 .90 35 .88 2 .1 0 .8

 Florance township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 46 89 99 84 91 35 .89 34 .73 0 .9 2 .9

 Glenfield city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 134 118 57 59 62 0 .14 0 .14 650 .0 407 .1

 Glenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 68 85 32 34 38 35 .83 35 .70 1 .4 0 .9

 Grace City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 71 108 36 39 49 0 .40 0 .40 157 .5 90 .0

 Haven township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 47 50 24 23 23 35 .92 35 .29 1 .0 0 .7

 Larrabee township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 46 60 22 23 25 35 .50 34 .81 1 .6 0 .6

 Longview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 53 56 26 25 32 36 .12 35 .36 1 .3 0 .7

 McHenry city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 71 85 37 45 57 0 .25 0 .25 224 .0 148 .0

 McHenry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 65 87 29 28 34 35 .66 35 .01 1 .5 0 .8

 McKinnon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 36 43 16 19 22 36 .04 35 .66 0 .7 0 .4

 Melville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 38 55 26 23 27 36 .09 34 .33 1 .0 0 .8

 Nordmore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 70 90 28 30 35 35 .67 35 .54 1 .8 0 .8

 Rolling Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . 32 41 52 21 20 24 35 .97 35 .69 0 .9 0 .6

 Rose Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 90 94 34 37 34 35 .69 35 .10 1 .9 1 .0

 Wyard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 71 62 25 25 27 35 .33 34 .59 1 .8 0 .7
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 19

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,680 1,924 2,108 967 973 1,035 1,002 .39 1,000 .79 1 .7 1 .0

 Beach city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,019 1,116 1,205 601 570 614 1 .93 1 .93 528 .0 311 .4

 Beach township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 189 201 57 56 64 105 .01 104 .91 1 .5 0 .5

 Bullion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 25 50 11 19 25 35 .88 35 .86 0 .8 0 .3

 Delhi township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 43 46 17 17 18 35 .90 35 .85 0 .8 0 .5

 East Golden Valley UT . . . . . . . . . . . 22 12 13 7 4 5 71 .30 71 .15 0 .3 0 .1

 Elk Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 11 10 6 5 6 35 .73 35 .66 0 .2 0 .2

 Elmwood UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 9 13 9 8 7 35 .61 35 .58 0 .5 0 .3

 Garner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 28 25 13 17 12 35 .89 35 .86 0 .4 0 .4

 Golva city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 106 101 52 71 62 0 .33 0 .33 184 .8 157 .6

 Henry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 27 27 17 20 15 72 .46 72 .40 0 .3 0 .2

 Lone Tree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 156 166 62 64 70 105 .20 105 .07 1 .2 0 .6

 North Golden Valley UT . . . . . . . . . . 22 32 35 16 16 19 143 .30 143 .15 0 .2 0 .1

 Pearl township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 9 12 5 5 6 72 .30 72 .19 0 .1 0 .1

 Saddle Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . 25 27 40 21 17 23 35 .46 35 .28 0 .7 0 .6

 Sentinel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 45 62 28 28 32 143 .64 143 .35 0 .3 0 .2

 Sentinel Butte city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 62 79 38 44 45 1 .06 1 .04 53 .8 36 .5

 South Golden Valley UT . . . . . . . . . . 15 27 23 7 12 12 71 .40 71 .16 0 .2 0 .1

Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,861 66,109 70,683 29,344 27,373 27,085 1,439 .50 1,436 .38 46 .5 20 .4

 Agnes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 83 94 43 45 51 36 .12 36 .12 2 .0 1 .2

 Allendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 470 368 284 159 121 90 35 .96 35 .92 13 .1 4 .4

 Americus township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 159 162 161 65 66 69 36 .03 36 .01 4 .4 1 .8

 Arvilla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 338 334 322 148 142 140 35 .84 35 .84 9 .4 4 .1

 Avon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 86 141 48 47 53 35 .87 35 .87 2 .2 1 .3

 Bentru township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 64 52 28 24 30 17 .73 17 .60 4 .4 1 .6

 Blooming township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295 761 1,456 124 226 480 34 .85 34 .53 8 .5 3 .6

 Grand Forks AFB CDP (part) . . . . – 490 1,220 – 108 362 0 .83 0 .83 – –

 Brenna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 725 638 526 263 225 178 36 .01 35 .98 20 .2 7 .3

 Chester township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 155 150 66 72 61 36 .15 36 .15 3 .4 1 .8

 Elkmount township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 54 53 22 26 27 35 .99 35 .86 1 .4 0 .6

 Elm Grove township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 123 134 69 69 67 36 .47 36 .47 3 .3 1 .9

 Emerado city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 510 483 233 328 277 0 .31 0 .31 1,335 .5 751 .6

 Fairfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 126 106 48 43 38 35 .53 35 .51 3 .3 1 .4

 Falconer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 304 313 314 117 111 109 12 .51 12 .37 24 .6 9 .5

 Ferry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 359 380 373 151 141 134 46 .18 45 .99 7 .8 3 .3

 Gilby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 243 262 110 114 117 0 .17 0 .17 1,394 .1 647 .1

 Gilby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 122 133 48 52 56 36 .05 36 .05 2 .2 1 .3

 Grace township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 82 90 36 35 34 36 .40 36 .38 2 .2 1 .0

 Grand Forks city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,838 r 49,366 49,417 23,449 r 20,873 19,586 20 .09 19 .90 2,655 .2 1,178 .3

 Grand Forks township . . . . . . . . . . . 505 r 403 470 207 r 149 152 11 .02 10 .95 46 .1 18 .9

 Hegton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 172 195 81 71 70 36 .54 36 .19 5 .6 2 .2

 Inkster city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 102 95 50 55 66 1 .00 1 .00 50 .0 50 .0

 Inkster township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 127 127 45 42 44 35 .58 35 .41 3 .9 1 .3

 Johnstown township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 91 109 44 49 60 36 .20 36 .20 2 .2 1 .2

 Lakeville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 71 91 37 32 42 35 .95 35 .47 1 .9 1 .0

 Larimore city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,346 1,433 1,464 623 620 654 0 .59 0 .59 2,281 .4 1,055 .9

 Larimore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 122 151 55 55 57 35 .84 35 .82 3 .3 1 .5

 Levant township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 56 59 26 30 32 35 .95 35 .95 1 .6 0 .7

 Lind township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 65 86 32 31 31 36 .15 36 .11 1 .7 0 .9

 Logan Center township . . . . . . . . . . 44 48 63 22 22 26 36 .10 36 .08 1 .2 0 .6

 Loretta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 52 69 28 30 31 36 .14 36 .14 1 .4 0 .8

 Manvel city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 370 333 149 144 129 0 .29 0 .29 1,241 .4 513 .8

 Mekinock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,535 4,529 8,316 892 1,494 2,352 36 .47 36 .47 69 .5 24 .5

 Grand Forks AFB CDP (part) . . . . 2,367 4,342 8,123 807 1,408 2,256 7 .31 7 .31 323 .8 110 .4

 Michigan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 161 162 56 61 61 36 .07 36 .05 3 .9 1 .6

 Moraine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 77 121 32 33 37 35 .91 35 .87 1 .8 0 .9

 Niagara city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 57 73 29 35 37 0 .97 0 .94 56 .4 30 .9

 Niagara township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 94 91 35 38 35 35 .21 35 .16 2 .0 1 .0

 Northwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 959 1,166 443 459 503 1 .27 1 .27 744 .1 348 .8

 Northwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 138 160 54 53 56 34 .52 34 .52 4 .0 1 .6

 Oakville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 200 238 176 100 88 66 35 .11 35 .06 5 .7 2 .9

 Pleasant View township . . . . . . . . . . 138 135 163 58 54 55 36 .05 36 .05 3 .8 1 .6

 Plymouth township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 71 107 36 43 52 36 .11 36 .05 1 .9 1 .0

 Reynolds city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 126 107 44 49 50 0 .25 0 .25 372 .0 176 .0

 Rye township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 297 261 213 124 99 73 33 .34 33 .34 8 .9 3 .7

 Strabane township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 136 154 48 57 66 35 .56 35 .55 2 .8 1 .4
20 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Grand Forks County—Con .

 Thompson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 1,006 930 362 339 294 0 .46 0 .46 2,143 .5 787 .0

 Turtle River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 174 218 177 66 72 68 33 .56 33 .29 5 .2 2 .0

 Union township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 209 201 78 74 81 35 .95 35 .93 5 .4 2 .2

 Walle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 457 369 277 177 145 116 38 .91 38 .72 11 .8 4 .6

 Washington township . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 134 125 49 50 51 36 .04 36 .04 3 .2 1 .4

 Wheatfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 109 100 35 40 41 36 .14 36 .14 2 .0 1 .0

Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,394 2,841 3,549 1,690 1,722 2,011 1,665 .92 1,659 .14 1 .4 1 .0

 Carson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 319 383 194 201 224 4 .02 4 .02 72 .9 48 .3

 East Grant UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 540 684 714 301 294 310 750 .57 750 .22 0 .7 0 .4

 Elgin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 642 659 765 416 379 415 1 .05 1 .05 611 .4 396 .2

 Elm township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 57 70 26 35 41 34 .75 34 .75 1 .3 0 .7

 Heil CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 (X) (X) 11 (X) (X) 0 .20 0 .20 75 .0 55 .0

 Fisher township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 24 36 11 11 13 32 .99 32 .94 0 .5 0 .3

 Freda township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 12 21 5 5 10 35 .96 35 .92 0 .3 0 .1

 Howe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 11 16 7 5 12 31 .66 31 .63 0 .4 0 .2

 Lark township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 60 68 22 26 30 36 .00 36 .00 1 .3 0 .6

 Leipzig township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 55 83 26 23 32 35 .98 35 .98 1 .1 0 .7

 Leith city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 28 43 18 21 28 1 .25 1 .23 13 .0 14 .6

 Minnie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 76 102 35 38 44 34 .70 34 .70 1 .8 1 .0

 New Leipzig city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 274 326 155 164 180 0 .89 0 .89 248 .3 174 .2

 Pretty Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 18 31 12 13 16 35 .82 35 .82 0 .4 0 .3

 Raleigh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 62 86 29 37 45 36 .01 35 .99 1 .0 0 .8

 Raleigh CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (X) (X) 9 (X) (X) 0 .29 0 .29 41 .4 31 .0

 Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 32 8 10 15 35 .58 35 .58 0 .4 0 .2

 West Grant UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 343 404 559 410 429 512 518 .29 512 .09 0 .7 0 .8

 Winona township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 48 39 15 17 15 40 .40 40 .33 1 .0 0 .4

Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,420 2,754 3,303 1,461 1,521 1,660 716 .44 708 .81 3 .4 2 .1

 Addie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 53 70 34 34 38 35 .58 33 .27 1 .9 1 .0

 Ball Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 82 109 32 34 39 36 .49 36 .49 1 .5 0 .9

 Bartley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 31 46 17 19 21 34 .88 34 .32 0 .7 0 .5

 Binford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 201 233 125 120 129 0 .35 0 .35 522 .9 357 .1

 Broadview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 35 53 22 23 30 35 .38 33 .92 1 .1 0 .6

 Bryan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 63 70 24 26 30 35 .97 35 .95 1 .1 0 .7

 Clearfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 49 65 26 24 32 35 .99 35 .36 1 .2 0 .7

 Cooperstown city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 1,053 1,247 543 563 595 0 .97 0 .97 1,014 .4 559 .8

 Cooperstown township . . . . . . . . . . . 56 82 86 32 33 35 35 .75 35 .45 1 .6 0 .9

 Dover township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 55 57 25 25 25 35 .35 35 .19 1 .3 0 .7

 Greenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 92 117 50 51 66 34 .91 34 .91 2 .9 1 .4

 Hannaford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 181 204 79 85 92 0 .22 0 .22 595 .5 359 .1

 Helena township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 58 64 24 28 36 36 .08 35 .98 1 .4 0 .7

 Kingsley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 59 74 25 24 30 36 .04 36 .04 1 .4 0 .7

 Lenora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 87 97 32 36 39 35 .24 34 .79 1 .7 0 .9

 Mabel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 81 110 47 54 64 36 .10 35 .99 1 .4 1 .3

 Sutton CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 (X) (X) 23 (X) (X) 0 .20 0 .20 85 .0 115 .0

 Pilot Mound township . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 59 81 28 31 37 36 .20 36 .06 1 .1 0 .8

 Romness township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 50 50 23 25 29 35 .77 35 .72 1 .0 0 .6

 Rosendal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 40 54 71 79 89 35 .26 34 .78 1 .0 2 .0

 Sverdrup township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 90 109 42 46 45 36 .05 36 .01 2 .6 1 .2

 Tyrol township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 125 161 56 57 61 36 .86 36 .67 3 .2 1 .5

 Jessie CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) 0 .47 0 .47 53 .2 29 .8

 Washburn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 73 67 31 30 31 35 .89 35 .86 1 .9 0 .9

 Willow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 55 79 73 74 67 35 .11 34 .52 1 .5 2 .1

Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,477 2,715 3,445 1,414 1,419 1,637 1,133 .78 1,132 .22 2 .2 1 .2

 Acme township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 37 34 14 16 16 36 .02 36 .01 0 .7 0 .4

 Ashby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 8 10 5 5 7 32 .18 32 .18 0 .1 0 .2

 Baer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 31 41 12 12 16 32 .34 32 .26 0 .8 0 .4

 Beery township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 30 (X) 13 15 (X) 35 .46 35 .26 0 .9 0 .4

 Black Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 46 47 20 16 16 35 .80 35 .80 1 .1 0 .6

 Brittian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 15 25 12 12 14 35 .78 35 .70 0 .5 0 .3

 Campbell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 37 62 20 17 23 35 .15 35 .13 0 .8 0 .6

 Cannon Ball township . . . . . . . . . . . 45 60 104 33 33 37 35 .99 35 .99 1 .3 0 .9

 Castle Rock township . . . . . . . . . . . 49 80 96 33 37 51 35 .93 35 .92 1 .4 0 .9

 Central Hettinger UT . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 (X) (X) 24 (X) (X) 71 .62 71 .52 0 .6 0 .3
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 21

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Hettinger County—Con .

 Chilton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 42 36 16 14 18 36 .24 36 .20 0 .9 0 .4

 Clark township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 24 32 13 12 13 35 .52 35 .51 0 .9 0 .4

 Farina township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 29 52 17 14 15 36 .47 36 .27 0 .5 0 .5

 Havelock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 27 34 12 13 17 35 .58 35 .57 0 .6 0 .3

 Highland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 24 34 12 11 13 34 .39 34 .37 0 .4 0 .3

 Kennedy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 36 63 24 22 29 36 .14 36 .07 0 .9 0 .7

 Kern township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 22 14 12 8 32 .38 32 .36 0 .6 0 .4

 Kunze township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 46 66 31 29 31 36 .46 36 .43 1 .4 0 .9

 Madison township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 52 55 15 15 16 36 .32 36 .32 1 .1 0 .4

 Merrill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 13 11 8 10 8 32 .29 32 .03 0 .3 0 .2

 Mott city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 721 808 1,019 415 441 506 0 .90 0 .90 801 .1 461 .1

 Mott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 40 69 32 22 29 35 .27 35 .20 1 .7 0 .9

 New England city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600 555 663 319 320 363 0 .49 0 .49 1,224 .5 651 .0

 New England township . . . . . . . . . . 107 107 124 47 44 46 35 .58 35 .58 3 .0 1 .3

 Odessa township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 17 25 9 9 10 35 .83 35 .77 0 .4 0 .3

 Regent city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 211 268 120 126 142 0 .56 0 .56 285 .7 214 .3

 Rifle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 46 55 20 18 21 35 .56 35 .54 1 .2 0 .6

 St . Croix township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 46 48 16 15 16 36 .66 36 .66 0 .9 0 .4

 Solon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 33 42 19 17 19 35 .97 35 .89 0 .6 0 .5

 Steiner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 36 33 14 15 15 35 .07 35 .03 0 .7 0 .4

 Strehlow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 27 46 13 12 19 35 .96 35 .88 0 .8 0 .4

 Tepee Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 37 54 19 17 17 35 .81 35 .80 1 .1 0 .5

 Wagendorf township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 24 46 11 13 23 35 .97 35 .96 0 .5 0 .3

 Walker township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 36 12 11 15 36 .11 36 .07 0 .6 0 .3

Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,435 2,753 3,332 1,674 1,610 1,672 1,432 .91 1,351 .19 1 .8 1 .2

 Allen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 68 66 23 25 24 35 .29 34 .19 1 .6 0 .7

 Atwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 29 47 16 19 21 35 .53 33 .49 0 .6 0 .5

 Baker township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 39 60 20 19 21 39 .93 39 .30 1 .0 0 .5

 Buckeye township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 30 34 19 18 21 35 .88 32 .53 0 .9 0 .6

 Bunker township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 35 48 17 18 21 36 .07 36 .01 0 .6 0 .5

 Chestina township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 21 40 14 14 14 35 .98 35 .73 0 .7 0 .4

 Clear Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 56 65 28 28 32 35 .55 34 .51 1 .1 0 .8

 Crown Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 19 25 10 8 12 32 .27 30 .80 0 .2 0 .3

 Crystal Springs township . . . . . . . . . 32 45 64 25 25 27 36 .05 35 .41 0 .9 0 .7

 Dawson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 75 78 54 52 50 0 .34 0 .34 179 .4 158 .8

 Excelsior township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 26 46 16 11 14 36 .09 35 .57 1 .0 0 .4

 Frettim township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 22 39 16 14 16 35 .83 33 .27 0 .3 0 .5

 Graf township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 39 17 19 21 36 .00 31 .40 0 .6 0 .5

 Haynes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 19 27 9 9 12 35 .84 34 .34 0 .5 0 .3

 Kickapoo UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 16 29 10 9 10 35 .50 33 .03 0 .2 0 .3

 Lake Williams township . . . . . . . . . . 22 18 39 32 25 24 35 .82 31 .27 0 .7 1 .0

 Manning township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 77 103 38 38 32 71 .59 69 .34 0 .9 0 .5

 Merkel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 39 65 21 21 25 71 .59 65 .64 0 .4 0 .3

 Northwest township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 26 34 13 12 12 34 .46 32 .80 0 .7 0 .4

 Peace township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 33 49 12 17 17 36 .16 34 .02 0 .8 0 .4

 Petersville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 27 43 17 22 22 35 .94 34 .01 0 .4 0 .5

 Pettibone city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 88 93 62 60 66 0 .17 0 .17 411 .8 364 .7

 Pettibone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 50 70 31 26 29 35 .75 32 .13 1 .4 1 .0

 Pleasant Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . 56 50 59 25 21 24 35 .96 35 .45 1 .6 0 .7

 Quinby township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9 23 8 6 8 35 .96 29 .27 0 .2 0 .3

 Rexine township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 4 28 7 7 13 35 .56 33 .95 0 .1 0 .2

 Robinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 71 87 56 56 61 0 .17 0 .17 217 .6 329 .4

 Robinson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 38 61 21 21 23 35 .94 34 .40 1 .0 0 .6

 Sibley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 100 91 217 192 192 35 .66 31 .64 2 .4 6 .9

 South Kidder UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 38 36 25 14 15 36 .07 33 .12 2 .4 0 .8

 Steele city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715 761 762 362 367 351 0 .57 0 .57 1,254 .4 635 .1

 Stewart township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 19 34 13 12 12 34 .64 33 .27 0 .8 0 .4

 Tanner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 33 41 20 16 19 36 .34 34 .10 0 .8 0 .6

 Tappen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 210 239 106 100 114 1 .05 1 .05 187 .6 101 .0

 Tappen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 90 95 37 32 32 34 .91 34 .68 2 .6 1 .1

 Tuttle city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 106 160 69 79 86 0 .25 0 .25 320 .0 276 .0

 Tuttle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 56 89 33 33 32 35 .49 34 .48 1 .1 1 .0

 Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 38 42 13 14 15 36 .00 34 .67 0 .7 0 .4

 Vernon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 35 45 42 35 34 36 .03 29 .98 0 .9 1 .4

 Wallace township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 25 33 13 14 14 35 .57 34 .13 0 .7 0 .4
22 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Kidder County—Con .

 Weiser township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 41 53 21 26 25 35 .92 34 .86 1 .0 0 .6

 Westford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 40 40 16 15 14 36 .14 33 .40 0 .8 0 .5

 Williams township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 21 22 10 8 9 36 .24 33 .81 0 .4 0 .3

 Woodlawn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 89 89 40 33 36 34 .81 34 .66 2 .7 1 .2

LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,139 4,701 5,383 2,238 2,271 2,434 1,150 .89 1,145 .94 3 .6 2 .0

 Adrian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 110 132 58 52 56 35 .98 35 .97 2 .8 1 .6

 Badger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 59 64 24 23 26 36 .09 35 .79 1 .5 0 .7

 Berlin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 35 38 18 20 18 0 .10 0 .10 340 .0 180 .0

 Black Loam township . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 65 79 29 32 32 36 .03 35 .96 1 .2 0 .8

 Bluebird township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 41 68 24 30 34 35 .63 35 .57 1 .0 0 .7

 Dean township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 205 215 68 61 59 34 .78 34 .35 6 .5 2 .0

 Dickey city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 57 53 31 31 31 0 .22 0 .22 190 .9 140 .9

 Edgeley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 563 637 680 313 336 340 0 .75 0 .75 750 .7 417 .3

 Gladstone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 62 90 30 29 37 36 .01 36 .01 1 .4 0 .8

 Glen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 47 58 31 29 37 35 .37 33 .99 1 .1 0 .9

 Glenmore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 71 74 29 33 32 35 .96 35 .96 1 .5 0 .8

 Golden Glen township . . . . . . . . . . . 108 111 136 57 46 57 35 .35 35 .27 3 .1 1 .6

 Grand Rapids township . . . . . . . . . . 90 101 120 42 44 44 35 .94 35 .94 2 .5 1 .2

 Grandview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 55 85 27 28 34 35 .92 35 .85 1 .3 0 .8

 Greenville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 80 94 31 35 31 35 .96 35 .87 1 .3 0 .9

 Henrietta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 90 85 32 32 32 36 .04 36 .01 2 .3 0 .9

 Jud city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 76 84 50 51 53 0 .25 0 .25 288 .0 200 .0

 Kennison township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 99 120 52 58 60 35 .85 35 .83 3 .0 1 .5

 Kulm city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 354 422 514 248 251 283 0 .38 0 .38 931 .6 652 .6

 LaMoure city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 889 944 970 436 433 430 1 .32 1 .32 673 .5 330 .3

 Litchville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 69 90 30 36 45 36 .06 36 .00 1 .4 0 .8

 Marion city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 146 169 81 86 92 1 .00 0 .84 158 .3 96 .4

 Mikkelson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 42 63 23 23 25 35 .69 35 .61 1 .0 0 .6

 Nora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 81 87 30 30 34 36 .01 35 .95 2 .0 0 .8

 Norden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 60 77 29 30 32 35 .61 35 .56 1 .4 0 .8

 Ovid township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 60 81 25 27 32 35 .83 35 .33 1 .3 0 .7

 Pearl Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 61 81 26 24 27 36 .03 35 .27 1 .5 0 .7

 Pomona View township . . . . . . . . . . 22 19 43 15 12 26 35 .97 35 .84 0 .6 0 .4

 Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 51 84 32 40 43 36 .13 36 .12 1 .2 0 .9

 Raney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 30 33 14 12 20 35 .47 35 .43 0 .7 0 .4

 Ray township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 47 64 20 22 28 35 .96 35 .96 1 .2 0 .6

 Roscoe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 58 96 33 27 34 35 .91 35 .91 1 .6 0 .9

 Russell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 52 71 27 28 33 36 .00 35 .99 1 .0 0 .8

 Ryan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 95 107 35 36 40 35 .87 35 .59 2 .0 1 .0

 Saratoga township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 57 62 26 26 29 36 .19 36 .15 1 .4 0 .7

 Sheridan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 33 51 22 20 19 35 .03 34 .90 0 .8 0 .6

 Swede township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 61 61 34 26 39 35 .78 35 .72 1 .0 1 .0

 Verona city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 108 103 47 53 53 0 .25 0 .25 340 .0 188 .0

 Wano township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 59 62 15 17 22 36 .04 36 .04 1 .0 0 .4

 Willowbank township . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 145 139 44 42 35 36 .12 36 .09 3 .7 1 .2

Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,990 2,308 2,847 1,144 1,193 1,335 1,011 .24 992 .82 2 .0 1 .2

 East Logan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 412 594 168 214 257 314 .07 304 .77 0 .9 0 .6

 Finn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 33 29 18 19 17 34 .64 33 .80 0 .5 0 .5

 Fredonia city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 51 66 37 30 37 0 .24 0 .24 191 .7 154 .2

 Gackle city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 335 450 211 212 221 0 .56 0 .54 574 .1 390 .7

 Glendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 56 67 23 23 23 36 .74 36 .68 1 .5 0 .6

 Gutschmidt township . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 42 48 18 19 23 36 .45 35 .99 0 .8 0 .5

 Haag township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 37 47 13 21 25 35 .96 35 .96 0 .7 0 .4

 Janke township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 30 41 18 20 23 36 .16 35 .99 0 .8 0 .5

 Lehr city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 25 44 20 22 27 0 .07 0 .07 200 .0 285 .7

 Napoleon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 792 857 930 401 420 460 1 .40 1 .40 565 .7 286 .4

 Red Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 39 59 28 29 42 35 .70 33 .57 1 .3 0 .8

 Sealy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 31 40 11 14 16 36 .52 36 .36 0 .6 0 .3

 West Logan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 346 221 266 178 89 97 442 .73 437 .42 0 .8 0 .4

McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,395 5,987 6,528 2,948 2,983 3,320 1,911 .54 1,873 .95 2 .9 1 .6

 Anamoose city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 282 277 140 149 161 0 .62 0 .61 372 .1 229 .5

 Anamoose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 68 89 37 31 35 35 .47 35 .07 1 .8 1 .1

 Balfour city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 20 33 18 21 35 0 .49 0 .49 53 .1 36 .7
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 23

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

McHenry County—Con .

 Balfour township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 59 49 22 21 27 35 .69 35 .02 1 .1 0 .6

 Bantry city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 19 16 8 11 22 0 .17 0 .17 82 .4 47 .1

 Bantry township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 46 66 22 22 31 35 .79 35 .70 1 .0 0 .6

 Bergen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 11 15 10 11 9 0 .74 0 .74 9 .5 13 .5

 Berwick township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 62 93 27 27 37 36 .32 36 .08 1 .6 0 .7

 Bjornson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 59 56 22 23 26 35 .67 35 .39 1 .2 0 .6

 Brown township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 81 81 28 28 32 35 .42 35 .22 2 .3 0 .8

 Cottonwood Lake township . . . . . . . 20 27 36 14 14 19 36 .01 34 .24 0 .6 0 .4

 Deep River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 82 59 26 37 36 36 .15 36 .06 1 .3 0 .7

 Deering city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 118 99 44 50 59 0 .07 0 .07 1,400 .0 628 .6

 Deering township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 91 101 49 39 41 36 .04 35 .95 3 .0 1 .4

 Denbigh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 72 71 38 32 29 36 .47 36 .12 2 .3 1 .1

 Drake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 322 361 200 201 228 2 .02 1 .97 139 .6 101 .5

 East McHenry UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 130 122 49 53 68 179 .98 175 .56 0 .5 0 .3

 Egg Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 58 55 30 26 25 36 .40 34 .29 1 .9 0 .9

 Falsen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 43 13 13 18 35 .93 35 .85 0 .6 0 .4

 Gilmore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 16 20 9 8 11 36 .16 35 .49 0 .4 0 .3

 Granville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 286 236 135 141 142 0 .28 0 .27 892 .6 500 .0

 Granville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 107 114 46 38 48 35 .94 35 .16 3 .0 1 .3

 Grilley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 57 78 28 28 34 36 .03 35 .93 1 .5 0 .8

 Hendrickson township . . . . . . . . . . . 55 76 71 30 30 33 36 .15 36 .07 1 .5 0 .8

 Karlsruhe city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 119 143 61 70 76 0 .75 0 .75 109 .3 81 .3

 Karlsruhe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 60 63 24 25 28 35 .39 34 .28 1 .1 0 .7

 Kief city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 13 24 12 18 21 1 .24 1 .22 10 .7 9 .8

 Kottke Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 49 58 43 20 22 24 35 .64 35 .64 1 .4 0 .6

 Lake George township . . . . . . . . . . . 40 59 77 20 28 30 36 .08 35 .25 1 .1 0 .6

 Lake Hester township . . . . . . . . . . . 45 58 74 30 28 34 35 .96 35 .67 1 .3 0 .8

 Land township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 48 64 22 19 27 34 .77 34 .36 1 .1 0 .6

 Layton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 37 39 19 21 22 36 .05 35 .97 0 .8 0 .5

 Lebanon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 80 111 42 40 47 36 .11 35 .50 2 .2 1 .2

 Little Deep township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 49 54 23 27 29 36 .31 36 .29 1 .4 0 .6

 Meadow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 39 80 28 31 37 35 .46 30 .83 1 .4 0 .9

 Mouse River township . . . . . . . . . . . 15 22 36 12 11 16 35 .97 31 .27 0 .5 0 .4

 Newport township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 125 140 50 51 55 35 .73 35 .73 2 .5 1 .4

 Normal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 67 80 37 30 36 35 .74 35 .64 1 .9 1 .0

 Northeast McHenry UT . . . . . . . . . . 98 109 (X) 54 51 (X) 108 .11 107 .66 0 .9 0 .5

 North Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . . 103 89 110 47 42 40 35 .86 35 .83 2 .9 1 .3

 Norwich township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 148 167 65 60 65 35 .72 35 .62 4 .0 1 .8

 Odin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 38 59 24 22 23 36 .15 34 .42 1 .3 0 .7

 Olivia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 51 66 20 22 26 35 .91 35 .87 1 .1 0 .6

 Pratt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 36 51 28 25 29 36 .00 35 .98 1 .4 0 .8

 Riga township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 81 91 33 31 55 36 .38 34 .87 2 .3 0 .9

 Rose Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 29 26 13 13 14 35 .94 35 .81 0 .5 0 .4

 Round Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 43 49 16 21 22 36 .07 32 .53 1 .2 0 .5

 Saline township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 36 31 11 15 11 36 .27 36 .15 0 .7 0 .3

 Schiller township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 70 95 35 28 32 36 .43 35 .43 1 .4 1 .0

 Spring Grove township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 40 48 26 25 25 33 .97 32 .14 1 .2 0 .8

 Strege township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 56 67 27 25 31 36 .19 35 .27 1 .1 0 .8

 Towner city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533 574 669 337 335 362 0 .81 0 .81 658 .0 416 .0

 Upham city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 155 205 112 120 134 0 .33 0 .33 393 .9 339 .4

 Velva city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,084 1,049 968 493 483 486 0 .83 0 .83 1,306 .0 594 .0

 Velva township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 182 163 65 84 64 35 .13 35 .03 5 .2 1 .9

 Villard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 36 43 19 21 26 36 .01 35 .75 0 .4 0 .5

 Voltaire city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 51 63 22 21 26 0 .40 0 .40 100 .0 55 .0

 Voltaire township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 38 36 18 20 24 35 .43 35 .05 0 .9 0 .5

 Wagar township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 32 54 19 19 28 36 .07 36 .01 0 .8 0 .5

 Willow Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 40 62 19 25 33 36 .35 36 .24 1 .1 0 .5

McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,809 3,390 4,021 1,858 1,853 2,031 994 .74 974 .73 2 .9 1 .9

 Ashley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749 882 1,052 520 528 548 0 .63 0 .63 1,188 .9 825 .4

 East McIntosh UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278 365 454 183 185 204 360 .05 347 .57 0 .8 0 .5

 Lehr city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 89 147 80 76 96 0 .11 0 .11 600 .0 727 .3

 Northwest McIntosh UT . . . . . . . . . . 349 414 498 251 237 276 325 .91 321 .14 1 .1 0 .8

 Roloff township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 21 38 16 13 13 34 .03 33 .88 0 .4 0 .5

 Southwest McIntosh UT . . . . . . . . . . 257 333 434 181 165 193 272 .19 269 .59 1 .0 0 .7

 Venturia city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 23 30 12 14 18 0 .06 0 .06 166 .7 200 .0

 Wishek city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,002 1,122 1,171 516 532 569 1 .45 1 .44 695 .8 358 .3

 Zeeland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 141 197 99 103 114 0 .30 0 .30 286 .7 330 .0
24 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,360 5,737 6,383 3,090 2,719 3,178 2,860 .78 2,760 .32 2 .3 1 .1

 Alex township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 49 56 25 18 21 34 .49 34 .45 1 .7 0 .7

 Alexander city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 217 216 120 106 115 1 .44 1 .43 155 .9 83 .9

 Antelope Creek township . . . . . . . . . 15 19 18 13 13 12 35 .98 35 .95 0 .4 0 .4

 Arnegard city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 105 122 59 60 84 0 .25 0 .25 460 .0 236 .0

 Arnegard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 57 68 32 32 43 35 .63 35 .58 1 .8 0 .9

 Blue Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 59 81 33 36 38 35 .68 34 .50 2 .3 1 .0

 Central McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . . . . 717 689 862 351 307 381 417 .38 416 .10 1 .7 0 .8

 Charbon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 35 59 22 22 32 35 .84 35 .78 1 .0 0 .6

 East McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 23 (X) 10 11 (X) 31 .59 31 .58 1 .4 0 .3

 Elm Tree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 50 60 29 29 33 43 .89 39 .03 1 .1 0 .7

 Fort Berthold UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,399 1,207 (X) 516 336 (X) 161 .63 150 .14 9 .3 3 .4

 Four Bears Village CDP . . . . . . . . 517 364 309 155 90 87 1 .04 1 .04 497 .1 149 .0

 Mandaree CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 596 558 367 173 151 131 11 .22 11 .21 53 .2 15 .4

 Grail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 44 62 23 20 25 31 .65 31 .65 1 .2 0 .7

 Hawkeye township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 49 73 27 28 36 33 .56 33 .54 1 .5 0 .8

 Keene township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 35 44 16 15 19 36 .88 36 .88 1 .1 0 .4

 North McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 417 458 503 198 191 219 399 .55 379 .20 1 .1 0 .5

 Randolph township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 15 15 15 12 17 35 .81 35 .74 0 .4 0 .4

 Riverview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 12 5 8 12 5 61 .26 43 .86 0 .3 0 .2

 Sioux township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 113 146 61 62 77 70 .14 64 .41 1 .7 0 .9

 Southeast McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . 234 218 (X) 147 137 (X) 403 .45 401 .59 0 .6 0 .4

 Southwest McKenzie UT . . . . . . . . . 271 274 284 137 139 137 687 .38 684 .12 0 .4 0 .2

 Tri township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 (X) (X) 39 (X) (X) 124 .81 113 .82 0 .9 0 .3

 Twin Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 88 81 112 106 123 98 .73 79 .13 1 .4 1 .4

 Watford City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,744 1,435 1,784 873 790 913 1 .42 1 .40 1,245 .7 623 .6

 Yellowstone township . . . . . . . . . . . . 417 409 514 224 193 317 42 .33 40 .20 10 .4 5 .6

 East Fairview CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 (X) (X) 48 (X) (X) 0 .38 0 .38 200 .0 126 .3

McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,962 9,311 10,457 5,590 5,264 5,515 2,328 .02 2,110 .88 4 .2 2 .6

 Amundsville township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 62 80 24 28 34 36 .01 35 .92 1 .1 0 .7

 Andrews township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 54 47 24 22 24 35 .79 35 .78 1 .4 0 .7

 Aurena township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 36 16 15 19 36 .04 35 .60 0 .6 0 .4

 Benedict city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 53 52 35 27 30 0 .25 0 .25 264 .0 140 .0

 Blackwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 37 59 19 19 27 35 .47 35 .34 0 .8 0 .5

 Blue Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 22 29 15 16 23 35 .96 35 .88 0 .4 0 .4

 Butte city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 92 129 84 82 90 0 .25 0 .25 272 .0 336 .0

 Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 19 29 14 13 17 36 .03 35 .66 0 .4 0 .4

 Byersville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 16 39 11 13 17 36 .06 34 .81 0 .3 0 .3

 Coleharbor city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 106 88 51 56 58 0 .18 0 .18 438 .9 283 .3

 Cremerville township . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 45 63 14 17 33 35 .79 35 .74 0 .8 0 .4

 Deepwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 29 32 15 19 23 36 .05 36 .05 0 .6 0 .4

 Dogden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 58 73 31 31 40 35 .75 35 .35 1 .3 0 .9

 Douglas township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 49 53 20 22 22 35 .97 35 .72 1 .0 0 .6

 East McLean UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 102 111 120 120 144 70 .49 67 .84 1 .4 1 .8

 Fort Berthold UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 563 551 (X) 337 294 (X) 303 .45 201 .42 2 .8 1 .7

 White Shield CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 348 274 112 108 96 3 .80 3 .80 88 .4 29 .5

 Garrison city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,453 1,318 1,530 737 655 733 1 .38 1 .38 1,052 .9 534 .1

 Gate township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 25 33 14 15 21 35 .90 35 .69 0 .6 0 .4

 Greatstone township . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 37 50 22 22 22 36 .02 36 .01 1 .2 0 .6

 Horseshoe Valley township . . . . . . . 27 39 55 87 87 20 36 .05 35 .28 0 .8 2 .5

 Lake Williams township . . . . . . . . . . 59 66 82 31 34 35 35 .57 32 .40 1 .8 1 .0

 Longfellow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 31 55 16 18 22 36 .14 36 .09 1 .1 0 .4

 Loquemont township . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 57 80 34 28 34 35 .94 35 .90 1 .7 0 .9

 McGinnis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 81 89 27 28 30 36 .10 35 .42 1 .6 0 .8

 Malcolm township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 105 86 108 95 93 35 .45 26 .91 2 .9 4 .0

 Max city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334 278 301 164 150 155 0 .78 0 .78 428 .2 210 .3

 Medicine Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . 45 47 68 23 23 22 35 .05 34 .23 1 .3 0 .7

 Mercer city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 86 104 58 56 57 0 .23 0 .22 427 .3 263 .6

 Mercer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 32 38 19 22 23 35 .85 35 .10 1 .0 0 .5

 North Central McLean UT . . . . . . . . 527 461 393 266 222 206 197 .31 170 .60 3 .1 1 .6

 Otis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 57 65 120 102 175 35 .81 35 .15 1 .2 3 .4

 Riverdale city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 273 283 188 157 135 1 .35 1 .35 151 .9 139 .3

 Roseglen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 58 86 21 26 35 35 .96 35 .68 1 .0 0 .6

 Rosemont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 46 50 20 19 22 35 .99 35 .79 0 .9 0 .6

 Ruso city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 8 3 3 5 0 .25 0 .25 16 .0 12 .0

 St . Mary township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 147 152 100 177 144 105 35 .01 33 .24 4 .4 5 .3
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 25

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

McLean County—Con .

 Snow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 81 77 67 62 52 35 .47 21 .48 3 .7 3 .1

 South McLean UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 700 685 765 373 338 347 377 .00 370 .58 1 .9 1 .0

 Turtle Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 581 580 681 340 329 364 0 .52 0 .51 1,139 .2 666 .7

 Turtle Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 51 69 23 23 25 35 .96 33 .98 1 .3 0 .7

 Underwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 778 812 976 377 381 464 0 .91 0 .91 854 .9 414 .3

 Underwood UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 288 370 127 144 146 201 .75 181 .54 1 .2 0 .7

 Victoria township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 35 41 32 28 16 35 .95 31 .16 1 .2 1 .0

 Washburn city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,246 1,389 1,506 661 659 654 1 .89 1 .79 696 .1 369 .3

 West McLean UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177 195 (X) 132 126 (X) 130 .60 115 .89 1 .5 1 .1

 Wilton city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550 565 552 255 241 242 0 .38 0 .38 1,447 .4 671 .1

 Wise township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 59 48 238 233 228 35 .91 33 .38 1 .1 7 .1

Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,424 8,644 9,808 4,450 4,402 4,496 1,112 .49 1,042 .96 8 .1 4 .3

 Beulah city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,121 3,152 3,363 1,508 1,475 1,437 2 .52 2 .49 1,253 .4 605 .6

 East Mercer UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,140 1,153 1,254 815 749 727 379 .52 344 .60 3 .3 2 .4

 Fort Berthold UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 70 (X) 44 45 (X) 85 .44 57 .12 1 .1 0 .8

 Golden Valley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 183 239 117 124 139 0 .73 0 .73 249 .3 160 .3

 Hazen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,411 2,457 2,818 1,074 1,131 1,118 1 .27 1 .27 1,898 .4 845 .7

 Pick City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 166 203 132 117 129 0 .18 0 .18 683 .3 733 .3

 Stanton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366 345 517 198 198 230 0 .48 0 .47 778 .7 421 .3

 West Mercer UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 782 887 1,127 427 434 554 641 .31 635 .05 1 .2 0 .7

 Zap city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 231 287 135 129 162 1 .05 1 .04 227 .9 129 .8

Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27,471 25,303 23,700 12,079 10,587 9,467 1,945 .45 1,926 .27 14 .3 6 .3

 Almont city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 89 117 66 63 76 2 .64 2 .64 46 .2 25 .0

 Captain’s Landing township . . . . . . . 120 153 138 51 57 46 0 .43 0 .31 387 .1 164 .5

 East Morton UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,806 2,611 2,609 1,175 1,009 951 1,042 .72 1,027 .68 2 .7 1 .1

 Harmon CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 145 (X) (X) 49 (X) (X) 1 .57 1 .57 92 .4 31 .2

 Flasher city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 285 317 135 155 170 0 .71 0 .70 331 .4 192 .9

 Glen Ullin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 807 865 927 416 405 437 1 .07 1 .04 776 .0 400 .0

 Hebron city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 747 803 888 396 434 470 1 .49 1 .49 501 .3 265 .8

 Mandan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,331 16,718 15,177 7,950 6,958 5,910 11 .13 11 .03 1,661 .9 720 .8

 Mandan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,339 1,603 (X) 951 577 (X) 63 .97 62 .07 37 .7 15 .3

 New Salem city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 938 909 449 448 442 1 .47 1 .46 647 .9 307 .5

 West Morton UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,021 1,238 1,245 490 481 494 819 .82 817 .86 1 .2 0 .6

Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,673 6,631 7,021 4,119 3,438 3,675 1,941 .57 1,825 .30 4 .2 2 .3

 Alger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 34 43 26 19 18 35 .85 35 .39 1 .0 0 .7

 Austin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 34 35 15 21 17 35 .84 35 .67 1 .0 0 .4

 Banner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 39 49 18 16 19 35 .82 35 .79 0 .9 0 .5

 Bicker township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 45 58 21 18 24 35 .92 35 .79 1 .0 0 .6

 Big Bend township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 45 56 18 15 16 36 .54 31 .42 1 .1 0 .6

 Brookbank township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 28 41 15 15 13 35 .92 35 .91 0 .9 0 .4

 Burke township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 35 43 17 14 19 35 .72 35 .54 1 .1 0 .5

 Clearwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 23 31 54 41 53 36 .05 35 .47 1 .6 1 .5

 Cottonwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 37 51 20 17 21 35 .99 33 .67 1 .0 0 .6

 Crane Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 84 43 39 27 17 23 35 .98 35 .70 2 .4 0 .8

 Crowfoot township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 22 27 13 16 21 35 .98 34 .70 0 .5 0 .4

 Debing township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 40 56 25 20 25 35 .94 35 .63 1 .2 0 .7

 Egan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 46 66 19 22 33 36 .55 34 .00 1 .1 0 .6

 Fertile township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 63 75 25 23 30 35 .81 35 .80 1 .9 0 .7

 Howie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 46 41 15 14 13 35 .77 26 .89 1 .8 0 .6

 Idaho township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493 163 171 81 73 82 34 .75 33 .60 14 .7 2 .4

 James Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 39 50 22 16 22 36 .06 31 .82 1 .0 0 .7

 Kickapoo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 12 17 10 6 10 35 .89 33 .41 0 .8 0 .3

 Knife River township . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 20 23 22 12 15 35 .97 35 .69 1 .0 0 .6

 Liberty township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 15 19 183 147 119 35 .70 13 .46 1 .7 13 .6

 Lostwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 33 47 23 20 22 35 .85 34 .28 1 .2 0 .7

 Lowland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 60 71 26 31 37 36 .08 34 .47 1 .5 0 .8

 McAlmond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 38 36 17 18 21 35 .82 35 .02 1 .0 0 .5

 McGahan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 31 68 23 13 31 36 .50 34 .59 1 .6 0 .7

 Manitou township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 50 60 29 24 30 36 .69 36 .23 2 .7 0 .8

 Model township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 55 78 28 29 30 36 .52 36 .39 1 .7 0 .8

 Mountrail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 31 43 14 13 23 35 .88 35 .84 0 .8 0 .4

 Myrtle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 33 44 18 17 21 36 .52 36 .40 0 .6 0 .5

 New Town city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,925 1,367 1,388 701 512 553 1 .28 1 .28 1,503 .9 547 .7
26 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Mountrail County—Con .

 Oakland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 28 33 19 15 18 35 .95 35 .17 0 .7 0 .5

 Osborn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 285 555 375 110 190 123 35 .28 30 .30 9 .4 3 .6

 Osloe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 47 54 19 18 23 35 .98 35 .08 1 .2 0 .5

 Palermo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 77 95 67 53 60 2 .21 2 .20 33 .6 30 .5

 Palermo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 32 38 18 14 18 34 .21 33 .05 1 .0 0 .5

 Parshall city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 981 943 364 392 403 0 .55 0 .55 1,641 .8 661 .8

 Parshall township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 55 70 32 31 31 36 .02 35 .98 1 .5 0 .9

 Plaza city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 167 193 114 115 126 1 .14 1 .12 152 .7 101 .8

 Plaza township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 46 44 24 25 24 36 .17 36 .17 1 .1 0 .7

 Powers township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 20 15 23 19 34 36 .02 34 .41 1 .0 0 .7

 Powers Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 54 55 68 26 25 35 35 .87 35 .56 1 .5 0 .7

 Purcell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 47 60 23 19 22 35 .91 35 .50 1 .6 0 .6

 Rat Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 28 27 10 11 12 35 .88 35 .73 0 .6 0 .3

 Redmond township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 15 19 9 8 11 35 .98 33 .53 0 .1 0 .3

 Ross city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 48 61 54 29 40 0 .28 0 .28 346 .4 192 .9

 Ross township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 39 43 24 23 22 36 .32 35 .61 1 .2 0 .7

 Shell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 38 38 18 19 20 35 .97 35 .96 0 .8 0 .5

 Sidonia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 21 31 9 11 17 36 .00 34 .64 0 .4 0 .3

 Sikes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 50 55 29 23 27 35 .98 35 .52 2 .4 0 .8

 Sorkness township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 36 38 15 15 19 36 .13 35 .63 1 .0 0 .4

 Southwest Mountrail UT . . . . . . . . . . 66 55 41 174 55 31 58 .26 44 .99 1 .5 3 .9

 Spring Coulee township . . . . . . . . . . 39 61 72 27 30 31 35 .26 35 .15 1 .1 0 .8

 Stanley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,458 1,279 1,371 718 664 678 1 .83 1 .82 801 .1 394 .5

 Stave township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 36 48 16 14 20 36 .06 33 .31 1 .0 0 .5

 Van Hook township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 42 72 348 256 215 36 .45 32 .89 3 .2 10 .6

 Wayzetta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 24 38 14 13 18 35 .97 35 .90 0 .6 0 .4

 West Mountrail UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 114 139 220 82 150 114 .79 93 .58 1 .6 2 .4

 White Earth city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 63 73 37 27 57 1 .50 1 .50 53 .3 24 .7

 White Earth township . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 45 41 33 23 29 34 .41 34 .33 1 .7 1 .0

Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,126 3,715 4,410 1,927 2,014 2,261 1,008 .82 981 .77 3 .2 2 .0

 Adler township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 47 56 21 25 28 35 .98 35 .84 0 .8 0 .6

 Aneta city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 284 314 142 155 164 0 .99 0 .99 224 .2 143 .4

 Bergen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 48 89 29 26 39 35 .90 35 .32 1 .1 0 .8

 Central township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 38 63 19 24 28 36 .00 34 .83 0 .8 0 .5

 Clara township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 31 41 21 22 24 36 .03 34 .63 0 .6 0 .6

 Dahlen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 93 103 44 48 61 35 .96 35 .71 1 .9 1 .2

 Dahlen CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) 0 .14 0 .14 128 .6 121 .4

 Dayton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 84 81 39 37 38 34 .85 34 .51 2 .0 1 .1

 Dodds township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 51 59 24 24 25 36 .33 35 .93 1 .2 0 .7

 Enterprise township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 31 58 22 20 27 36 .05 35 .19 0 .8 0 .6

 Field township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 45 58 22 27 33 35 .96 35 .87 1 .2 0 .6

 Forde township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 35 61 28 27 37 35 .99 35 .35 1 .0 0 .8

 Hamlin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 80 70 34 38 36 34 .77 34 .66 2 .0 1 .0

 Illinois township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 32 34 15 19 24 36 .24 35 .02 2 .0 0 .4

 Lakota city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672 781 898 403 387 429 1 .03 1 .03 652 .4 391 .3

 Lakota township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 68 79 27 32 34 35 .08 34 .18 1 .5 0 .8

 Lee township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 71 88 32 44 45 35 .97 35 .80 1 .2 0 .9

 Leval township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 39 48 24 25 26 35 .87 31 .78 0 .9 0 .8

 McVille city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 470 559 247 266 281 1 .51 1 .44 242 .4 171 .5

 Melvin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 35 38 23 21 25 35 .92 34 .74 0 .8 0 .7

 Michigan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 60 82 34 29 37 59 .72 57 .46 1 .0 0 .6

 Michigan City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 345 413 173 176 201 0 .53 0 .51 576 .5 339 .2

 Nash township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 55 75 28 29 29 36 .05 35 .77 1 .5 0 .8

 Nesheim township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 38 49 23 23 27 35 .81 35 .74 1 .2 0 .6

 Ora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 73 61 27 32 35 35 .11 34 .41 2 .0 0 .8

 Osago township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 35 39 26 21 26 35 .60 35 .40 0 .9 0 .7

 Pekin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 80 101 50 63 70 0 .25 0 .25 280 .0 200 .0

 Petersburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 195 219 99 106 116 1 .04 1 .03 186 .4 96 .1

 Petersburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 42 54 23 25 27 47 .35 46 .26 0 .6 0 .5

 Rubin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 40 62 19 19 28 36 .10 34 .04 1 .1 0 .6

 Rugh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 38 51 18 20 24 35 .90 35 .79 0 .7 0 .5

 Sarnia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 66 83 41 44 60 36 .00 34 .77 1 .1 1 .2

 Tolna city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 202 230 109 118 122 0 .76 0 .76 218 .4 143 .4

 Wamduska township . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 40 48 22 20 27 35 .84 31 .09 1 .1 0 .7

 Williams township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 43 46 19 22 28 36 .35 35 .67 1 .3 0 .5
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 27

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,846 2,065 2,381 905 903 968 731 .19 722 .51 2 .6 1 .3

 Center city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 571 678 826 310 310 351 0 .46 0 .46 1,241 .3 673 .9

 East Oliver UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 876 872 980 390 371 388 444 .15 436 .60 2 .0 0 .9

 West Oliver UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 399 515 575 205 222 229 286 .58 285 .45 1 .4 0 .7

Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,413 8,585 9,238 3,859 4,115 4,294 1,121 .40 1,118 .69 6 .6 3 .4

 Advance township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 143 205 69 70 79 35 .89 35 .87 3 .6 1 .9

 Akra township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 252 260 103 107 105 35 .94 35 .56 6 .4 2 .9

 Bathgate city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 66 75 25 28 33 0 .27 0 .27 159 .3 92 .6

 Bathgate township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 45 94 31 30 33 26 .52 26 .52 2 .7 1 .2

 Beaulieu township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 154 205 66 60 90 36 .04 35 .95 4 .3 1 .8

 Canton City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 42 64 32 29 33 0 .14 0 .14 321 .4 228 .6

 Carlisle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 134 163 54 66 80 71 .66 71 .66 1 .4 0 .8

 Cavalier city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,302 1,537 1,508 723 750 717 0 .82 0 .82 1,587 .8 881 .7

 Cavalier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 588 652 672 258 264 264 70 .79 70 .73 8 .3 3 .6

 Crystal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 167 199 78 92 96 0 .65 0 .65 212 .3 120 .0

 Crystal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 73 103 32 37 41 35 .50 35 .50 1 .4 0 .9

 Drayton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 913 961 422 440 447 0 .65 0 .65 1,267 .7 649 .2

 Drayton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 33 47 19 26 33 35 .32 34 .88 0 .8 0 .5

 Elora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 81 82 32 35 47 35 .77 35 .77 1 .7 0 .9

 Felson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 102 113 43 47 59 44 .82 44 .82 1 .9 1 .0

 Gardar township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 89 112 58 61 62 35 .90 35 .90 2 .6 1 .6

 Hamilton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 73 74 37 40 43 0 .27 0 .27 225 .9 137 .0

 Hamilton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 53 61 30 38 35 44 .65 44 .65 0 .9 0 .7

 Joliette township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 91 118 46 50 59 70 .82 70 .04 1 .0 0 .7

 La Moure township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 131 134 54 59 56 35 .97 35 .91 3 .0 1 .5

 Lincoln township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 47 92 23 28 50 46 .62 46 .29 0 .9 0 .5

 Lodema township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 115 121 46 49 56 36 .19 36 .19 1 .9 1 .3

 Midland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 98 133 45 57 67 69 .88 69 .85 1 .0 0 .6

 Mountain city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 133 134 42 55 57 0 .14 0 .14 657 .1 300 .0

 Neche city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 437 434 168 188 200 0 .35 0 .35 1,060 .0 480 .0

 Neche township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 73 66 21 24 37 49 .06 49 .03 0 .8 0 .4

 Park township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 67 83 31 35 41 35 .92 35 .91 1 .7 0 .9

 Pembina city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 642 642 279 274 265 0 .77 0 .76 778 .9 367 .1

 Pembina township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 99 102 56 51 57 64 .85 64 .48 1 .3 0 .9

 St . Joseph township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 119 164 51 63 66 44 .92 44 .88 2 .1 1 .1

 St . Thomas city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 447 444 182 201 207 1 .06 1 .06 312 .3 171 .7

 St . Thomas township . . . . . . . . . . . . 119 165 163 69 81 89 71 .93 71 .92 1 .7 1 .0

 Thingvalla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 121 154 58 66 83 36 .04 36 .03 2 .8 1 .6

 Walhalla city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 1,057 1,131 515 556 552 1 .07 1 .05 948 .6 490 .5

 Walhalla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 134 125 61 58 55 44 .22 44 .17 2 .9 1 .4

Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,357 4,675 5,052 2,199 2,269 2,355 1,082 .33 1,018 .60 4 .3 2 .2

 Alexanter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 30 53 21 22 24 35 .88 35 .15 0 .8 0 .6

 Antelope Lake township . . . . . . . . . . 30 27 31 12 14 14 36 .17 31 .74 0 .9 0 .4

 Balta city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 73 79 47 49 56 0 .25 0 .22 295 .5 213 .6

 Balta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 42 53 16 14 24 35 .68 33 .95 0 .6 0 .5

 Central Pierce UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 23 29 10 12 14 36 .16 33 .26 0 .4 0 .3

 Elling township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 53 76 30 37 42 36 .24 34 .22 1 .3 0 .9

 Orrin CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) 0 .23 0 .23 95 .7 73 .9

 Elverum township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 50 72 24 27 29 35 .91 32 .15 1 .1 0 .7

 Hagel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 97 97 48 51 57 35 .94 35 .82 2 .4 1 .3

 Selz CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) 0 .14 0 .14 328 .6 214 .3

 Jefferson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 56 65 18 18 22 36 .19 35 .07 1 .3 0 .5

 Meyer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 93 97 33 34 31 36 .82 34 .05 2 .7 1 .0

 Ness township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 78 103 30 26 36 36 .74 36 .52 2 .3 0 .8

 North Pierce UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 509 609 781 281 301 353 395 .26 370 .09 1 .4 0 .8

 Barton CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) 0 .44 0 .34 58 .8 50 .0

 Reno Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 47 47 21 24 22 35 .95 34 .58 1 .1 0 .6

 Rugby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,876 2,939 2,909 1,407 1,434 1,369 1 .94 1 .94 1,482 .5 725 .3

 Rush Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 33 47 16 15 19 36 .11 34 .82 1 .1 0 .5

 South Pierce UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 118 129 48 48 54 107 .93 97 .10 0 .9 0 .5

 Torgerson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 73 87 26 26 28 35 .44 33 .18 1 .9 0 .8

 Truman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 52 65 26 25 33 35 .82 35 .36 1 .5 0 .7

 Tuscarora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 68 91 29 30 34 35 .87 34 .63 1 .8 0 .8

 White township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 64 61 29 32 35 35 .86 34 .59 1 .4 0 .8

 Wolford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 50 56 27 30 33 0 .16 0 .16 225 .0 168 .8
28 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,451 12,066 12,681 5,615 5,729 5,616 1,300 .91 1,186 .85 9 .6 4 .7

 Bartlett township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 64 92 45 41 48 36 .00 34 .69 2 .0 1 .3

 Brocket city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 65 81 38 35 43 0 .78 0 .77 74 .0 49 .4

 Cato township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 27 42 9 9 18 36 .16 35 .64 0 .5 0 .3

 Chain Lakes township . . . . . . . . . . . 12 20 24 8 10 18 36 .78 25 .65 0 .5 0 .3

 Churchs Ferry city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 77 118 5 46 58 0 .43 0 .43 27 .9 11 .6

 Coulee township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 108 135 36 50 73 35 .51 35 .29 1 .8 1 .0

 Crary city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 149 145 51 54 51 0 .93 0 .89 159 .6 57 .3

 Creel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,305 1,776 1,572 527 704 610 30 .20 14 .58 89 .5 36 .1

 De Groat township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 36 40 14 18 23 36 .57 31 .83 0 .7 0 .4

 Devils Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,141 7,222 7,782 3,481 3,508 3,325 6 .51 6 .50 1,098 .6 535 .5

 Dry Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 59 54 20 20 23 36 .04 29 .88 1 .5 0 .7

 Edmore city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 256 329 125 143 163 0 .27 0 .27 674 .1 463 .0

 Fancher township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 63 67 24 28 30 35 .74 35 .24 1 .4 0 .7

 Freshwater township . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 81 77 31 30 32 35 .99 27 .72 2 .7 1 .1

 Grand Harbor township . . . . . . . . . . 163 181 (X) 95 82 (X) 36 .03 34 .12 4 .8 2 .8

 Hammer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 85 76 33 28 31 35 .86 35 .15 1 .5 0 .9

 Hampden city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 60 89 35 53 58 0 .17 0 .17 282 .4 205 .9

 Harding township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 41 51 18 19 26 36 .53 36 .45 0 .9 0 .5

 Highland Center township . . . . . . . . 43 49 66 23 27 36 36 .01 35 .80 1 .2 0 .6

 Hope township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 15 29 11 12 17 35 .94 34 .21 0 .2 0 .3

 Klingstrup township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 56 72 24 25 37 35 .87 35 .87 1 .3 0 .7

 Lawton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 42 63 33 38 42 1 .00 0 .92 32 .6 35 .9

 Lawton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 39 44 21 23 23 35 .29 34 .39 0 .8 0 .6

 Lillehoff township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 30 50 26 22 35 35 .09 33 .68 0 .7 0 .8

 Minnewaukan township . . . . . . . . . . 199 154 133 70 60 52 36 .04 34 .56 5 .8 2 .0

 Morris township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 57 66 24 22 28 36 .02 32 .98 1 .6 0 .7

 Newbre township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 25 24 15 15 17 36 .13 34 .07 1 .1 0 .4

 Newland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 41 64 19 20 29 36 .06 35 .62 0 .7 0 .5

 Noonan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 47 57 16 15 19 35 .90 33 .79 0 .9 0 .5

 North Creel township . . . . . . . . . . . . 426 (X) (X) 180 (X) (X) 31 .59 30 .08 14 .2 6 .0

 Northfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 46 59 20 21 29 35 .69 34 .76 0 .8 0 .6

 Odessa township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 56 56 28 22 31 46 .21 37 .90 1 .3 0 .7

 Ontario township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 80 78 28 32 33 35 .91 33 .92 2 .1 0 .8

 Overland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 21 28 10 9 11 36 .00 35 .60 0 .4 0 .3

 Pelican township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 50 63 20 20 30 26 .79 25 .79 1 .5 0 .8

 Poplar Grove township . . . . . . . . . . . 218 214 (X) 130 131 (X) 35 .04 16 .22 13 .4 8 .0

 Prospect township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 33 46 19 19 23 35 .99 35 .76 0 .7 0 .5

 Royal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 30 35 17 20 21 35 .98 34 .99 0 .7 0 .5

 South Minnewaukan township . . . . . 225 197 72 103 88 30 41 .52 29 .09 7 .7 3 .5

 Starkweather city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 157 197 74 89 88 0 .14 0 .14 835 .7 528 .6

 Stevens township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 66 71 29 29 29 35 .03 33 .73 2 .0 0 .9

 Sullivan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 33 48 16 20 25 36 .07 35 .53 0 .7 0 .5

 Triumph township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 58 47 20 24 23 36 .60 36 .11 1 .1 0 .6

 Webster township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 100 108 44 48 53 36 .48 36 .07 1 .9 1 .2

Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,457 5,890 5,921 2,656 2,604 2,569 863 .74 862 .36 6 .3 3 .1

 Aliceton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 119 132 50 50 49 36 .23 36 .11 3 .4 1 .4

 Alleghany township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 60 62 24 24 27 36 .11 36 .10 1 .5 0 .7

 Bale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 75 95 38 32 37 36 .01 36 .00 2 .3 1 .1

 Big Bend township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 153 156 149 58 54 54 36 .36 36 .26 4 .2 1 .6

 Casey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 85 87 37 33 33 36 .32 36 .29 2 .5 1 .0

 Coburn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 59 76 26 26 27 35 .83 35 .82 1 .7 0 .7

 Elliott city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 44 32 15 18 16 0 .15 0 .15 166 .7 100 .0

 Elliott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 95 78 32 31 32 35 .78 35 .76 2 .2 0 .9

 Englevale CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . 11 (X) (X) 3 (X) (X) 0 .99 0 .99 11 .1 3 .0

 Enderlin city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 942 980 451 479 475 1 .41 1 .41 625 .5 319 .9

 Fort Ransom city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 70 111 64 44 65 0 .30 0 .30 256 .7 213 .3

 Fort Ransom township . . . . . . . . . . . 96 86 85 45 38 40 35 .48 35 .46 2 .7 1 .3

 Greene township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 126 146 49 49 53 35 .25 34 .79 3 .1 1 .4

 Hanson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 65 96 35 31 40 35 .98 35 .96 1 .9 1 .0

 Englevale CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . 29 (X) (X) 18 (X) (X) 0 .50 0 .50 58 .0 36 .0

 Island Park township . . . . . . . . . . . . 262 299 300 114 129 125 33 .89 33 .84 7 .7 3 .4

 Isley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 48 44 16 17 20 36 .11 35 .88 1 .2 0 .4

 Liberty township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 118 132 55 52 53 34 .35 34 .34 3 .4 1 .6

 Lisbon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,154 2,292 2,177 1,090 1,017 940 2 .25 2 .25 957 .3 484 .4

 Moore township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 101 116 41 44 49 35 .71 35 .71 2 .6 1 .1
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 29

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Ransom County—Con .

 Northland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 98 80 27 50 36 35 .78 35 .73 1 .5 0 .8

 Owego township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 35 32 11 9 13 36 .06 36 .03 0 .6 0 .3

 Preston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 90 94 40 38 44 35 .70 35 .67 2 .2 1 .1

 Rosemeade township . . . . . . . . . . . 39 37 55 19 17 22 36 .28 36 .26 1 .1 0 .5

 Sandoun township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 85 70 38 39 41 36 .05 36 .05 1 .8 1 .1

 McLeod CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) 0 .77 0 .77 35 .1 26 .0

 Scoville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 30 37 13 13 14 18 .05 18 .05 1 .9 0 .7

 Sheldon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 135 149 61 71 74 0 .22 0 .22 527 .3 277 .3

 Shenford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 140 143 62 60 57 53 .73 53 .66 2 .2 1 .2

 Springer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 88 82 35 36 36 35 .97 35 .92 1 .6 1 .0

 Sydna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 182 133 52 47 43 36 .33 36 .33 5 .3 1 .4

 Tuller township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 130 148 58 56 54 36 .02 36 .01 3 .0 1 .6

Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,470 2,610 3,160 1,386 1,413 1,558 892 .75 877 .05 2 .8 1 .6

 Brandon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 67 80 32 31 41 34 .87 34 .74 2 .1 0 .9

 Callahan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 29 56 12 17 27 35 .66 31 .52 0 .9 0 .4

 Clay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 44 42 22 21 24 35 .91 35 .86 1 .1 0 .6

 Colquhoun township . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 75 97 29 32 44 43 .18 43 .17 1 .5 0 .7

 Eden Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 53 59 23 26 28 43 .64 43 .50 1 .0 0 .5

 Ensign township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 75 75 56 33 32 35 .75 35 .74 3 .6 1 .6

 Fairbanks township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 52 77 23 23 32 35 .99 35 .72 1 .0 0 .6

 Glenburn city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 374 439 183 181 182 0 .25 0 .25 1,520 .0 732 .0

 Grano city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9 9 3 5 3 0 .30 0 .30 23 .3 10 .0

 Grassland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 30 47 14 15 21 35 .72 33 .23 0 .6 0 .4

 Grover township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 29 46 17 19 22 35 .84 35 .83 0 .8 0 .5

 Hamerly township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 23 44 15 19 20 35 .86 35 .86 0 .7 0 .4

 Hamlet township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 59 77 23 22 27 35 .94 35 .70 1 .4 0 .6

 Hurley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 52 65 26 27 29 35 .67 35 .64 1 .1 0 .7

 Ivanhoe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 46 54 21 21 33 35 .93 35 .93 0 .8 0 .6

 Lockwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 24 23 9 9 14 35 .92 35 .60 0 .7 0 .3

 Loraine city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 19 15 7 8 11 0 .25 0 .25 36 .0 28 .0

 McKinney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 43 64 151 141 122 35 .86 35 .30 1 .8 4 .3

 Mohall city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 812 931 372 397 427 1 .08 1 .08 725 .0 344 .4

 Muskego township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 44 80 22 20 33 36 .06 31 .54 1 .2 0 .7

 Plain township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 34 46 16 18 26 36 .13 35 .78 0 .8 0 .4

 Prescott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 35 37 13 12 14 36 .02 35 .95 0 .8 0 .4

 Prosperity township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 38 48 18 24 24 43 .43 43 .39 0 .6 0 .4

 Rockford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 49 81 28 28 32 35 .96 35 .94 1 .3 0 .8

 Roosevelt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 33 41 17 22 26 35 .78 33 .63 0 .7 0 .5

 Sherwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 255 286 133 138 144 0 .31 0 .31 780 .6 429 .0

 Stafford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 51 56 21 24 29 43 .46 43 .36 0 .9 0 .5

 Tolley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 63 79 40 39 47 0 .13 0 .13 361 .5 307 .7

 Van Buren township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 44 59 23 21 21 36 .06 36 .02 1 .3 0 .6

 White Ash township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 49 47 17 20 23 35 .80 35 .80 0 .9 0 .5

Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,321 17,998 18,148 7,503 7,575 7,394 1,445 .45 1,435 .78 11 .4 5 .2

 Abercrombie city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 296 252 121 138 121 0 .61 0 .61 431 .1 198 .4

 Abercrombie township . . . . . . . . . . . 268 285 286 118 117 119 60 .77 60 .77 4 .4 1 .9

 Antelope township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 116 127 46 48 49 36 .02 36 .02 3 .1 1 .3

 Barney city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 69 79 28 28 27 0 .16 0 .16 325 .0 175 .0

 Barney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 148 143 50 48 51 35 .38 35 .38 3 .8 1 .4

 Barrie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 198 150 80 69 62 35 .18 35 .18 5 .4 2 .3

 Belford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 134 162 50 52 59 35 .68 35 .68 3 .4 1 .4

 Brandenburg township . . . . . . . . . . . 102 142 127 44 50 52 35 .25 35 .25 2 .9 1 .2

 Brightwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . 203 r 202 184 92 100 93 34 .67 32 .70 6 .2 2 .8

 Center township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 465 512 423 178 203 148 44 .42 44 .42 10 .5 4 .0

 Christine city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 153 140 67 61 59 0 .19 0 .19 789 .5 352 .6

 Colfax city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 91 80 48 44 39 1 .02 1 .02 118 .6 47 .1

 Colfax township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 241 220 201 95 83 77 59 .11 59 .11 4 .1 1 .6

 Danton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 153 159 54 57 60 35 .06 35 .06 3 .9 1 .5

 Devillo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 109 121 38 45 46 35 .98 35 .98 2 .3 1 .1

 Dexter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 95 106 37 40 41 35 .83 35 .01 1 .9 1 .1

 Duerr township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 135 173 60 64 77 64 .07 62 .89 1 .9 1 .0

 Dwight city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 75 83 34 36 38 0 .20 0 .20 410 .0 170 .0

 Dwight township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 313 286 260 119 107 84 45 .33 45 .21 6 .9 2 .6

 Eagle township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 247 237 105 95 102 42 .26 42 .26 6 .0 2 .5
30 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Richland County—Con .

 Elma township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 77 102 33 31 33 36 .47 35 .55 2 .2 0 .9

 Fairmount city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 406 427 195 202 204 0 .32 0 .32 1,146 .9 609 .4

 Fairmount township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 111 130 42 44 50 40 .88 40 .88 2 .2 1 .0

 Freeman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 51 58 23 24 23 35 .88 35 .88 1 .1 0 .6

 Garborg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 89 105 43 39 45 36 .05 36 .05 2 .7 1 .2

 Grant township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 130 190 50 54 64 35 .30 33 .60 3 .0 1 .5

 Great Bend city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 118 108 38 42 47 0 .55 0 .55 109 .1 69 .1

 Greendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 124 121 42 45 51 36 .27 36 .21 2 .9 1 .2

 Hankinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 919 1,058 1,038 501 524 510 1 .59 1 .59 578 .0 315 .1

 Helendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 112 108 46 44 43 35 .01 35 .01 3 .0 1 .3

 Homestead township . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 127 118 35 43 42 36 .07 36 .07 2 .5 1 .0

 Ibsen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 115 144 52 58 59 36 .24 36 .24 2 .9 1 .4

 LaMars township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 95 102 41 40 45 35 .93 35 .93 2 .2 1 .1

 Liberty Grove township . . . . . . . . . . 114 100 117 45 47 53 35 .86 35 .84 3 .2 1 .3

 Lidgerwood city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 652 r 781 799 417 404 431 0 .66 0 .66 987 .9 631 .8

 Mantador city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 71 77 36 37 37 0 .14 0 .14 457 .1 257 .1

 Mooreton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 204 193 92 95 94 0 .27 0 .27 729 .6 340 .7

 Mooreton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 124 120 47 49 50 35 .19 35 .14 3 .3 1 .3

 Moran township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 80 89 31 32 40 35 .55 32 .82 2 .1 0 .9

 Nansen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 118 112 42 48 48 36 .00 36 .00 2 .4 1 .2

 Sheyenne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 50 62 24 23 23 35 .66 35 .64 1 .4 0 .7

 Summit township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217 247 245 93 92 102 53 .38 53 .36 4 .1 1 .7

 Viking township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 63 71 37 34 32 36 .12 36 .12 1 .9 1 .0

 Wahpeton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,766 8,586 8,751 3,482 3,492 3,317 5 .29 5 .29 1,468 .1 658 .2

 Walcott city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 189 178 103 89 83 1 .02 1 .02 230 .4 101 .0

 Walcott township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 326 338 302 124 115 120 58 .74 58 .74 5 .5 2 .1

 Waldo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 77 101 42 35 40 35 .35 35 .31 2 .9 1 .2

 West End township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 56 52 16 20 18 36 .12 36 .12 1 .1 0 .4

 Wyndmere city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 501 226 247 232 0 .88 0 .88 487 .5 256 .8

 Wyndmere township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 102 134 41 41 54 35 .47 35 .47 2 .3 1 .2

Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,937 13,674 12,772 5,372 5,027 4,742 939 .34 903 .08 15 .4 5 .9

 Dunseith city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 773 739 723 299 282 267 1 .00 1 .00 773 .0 299 .0

 East Rolette UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 493 546 585 214 218 236 261 .30 254 .87 1 .9 0 .8

 Kohlmeier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 33 49 15 20 21 35 .69 35 .26 0 .8 0 .4

 Maryville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 27 49 18 14 20 36 .02 35 .73 1 .0 0 .5

 Mylo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 19 20 12 14 13 0 .91 0 .91 22 .0 13 .2

 North Rolette UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,517 3,261 3,045 1,351 1,162 1,073 281 .01 261 .79 13 .4 5 .2

 East Dunseith CDP . . . . . . . . . . . 500 219 260 152 60 68 5 .21 5 .13 97 .5 29 .6

 Rolette city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 594 538 623 284 286 298 0 .99 0 .99 600 .0 286 .9

 Rolla city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,280 1,417 1,371 619 656 647 1 .43 1 .43 895 .1 432 .9

 St . John city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 358 368 151 154 141 0 .45 0 .45 757 .8 335 .6

 Shell Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 449 470 426 137 128 115 36 .12 35 .58 12 .6 3 .9

 Shell Valley CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 374 395 343 109 103 90 5 .03 5 .03 74 .4 21 .7

 South Rolette UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375 419 210 169 167 86 176 .60 171 .60 2 .2 1 .0

 South Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . 31 32 40 14 15 15 35 .96 35 .95 0 .9 0 .4

 Turtle Mountain UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,000 5,815 4,940 2,089 1,911 1,699 71 .85 67 .53 88 .8 30 .9

 Belcourt CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,078 2,440 2,458 783 856 864 6 .01 5 .81 357 .7 134 .8

 Green Acres CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 575 (X) (X) 163 (X) (X) 1 .50 1 .50 383 .3 108 .7

 Shell Valley CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 823 (X) (X) 284 (X) (X) 10 .01 9 .98 82 .5 28 .5

Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,829 4,366 4,549 2,004 2,016 2,057 866 .90 858 .51 4 .5 2 .3

 Bowen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 98 110 33 37 36 35 .71 35 .71 1 .9 0 .9

 Brampton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 66 93 35 38 51 36 .43 36 .38 1 .6 1 .0

 Cayuga city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 61 60 26 32 39 0 .99 0 .99 27 .3 26 .3

 Cogswell city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 165 184 73 81 105 0 .33 0 .33 300 .0 221 .2

 Denver township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 78 92 41 41 40 35 .44 34 .87 1 .6 1 .2

 Dunbar township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 103 95 112 44 43 45 36 .09 36 .08 2 .9 1 .2

 Forman city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504 506 586 255 256 263 0 .71 0 .70 720 .0 364 .3

 Forman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 69 72 29 26 33 35 .32 35 .32 1 .4 0 .8

 Gwinner city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 753 717 585 370 329 246 2 .08 2 .08 362 .0 177 .9

 Hall township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 188 165 59 73 78 36 .06 36 .02 3 .6 1 .6

 De Lamere CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) 0 .26 0 .26 115 .4 53 .8

 Harlem township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 52 32 25 22 16 36 .08 35 .95 1 .1 0 .7

 Havana city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 94 124 47 51 61 0 .38 0 .37 191 .9 127 .0

 Herman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 83 122 29 30 42 35 .94 35 .90 1 .6 0 .8
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 31

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Sargent County—Con .

 Jackson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 40 42 19 21 26 35 .81 35 .81 0 .9 0 .5

 Kingston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 107 136 52 52 61 42 .32 41 .94 2 .0 1 .2

 Marboe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 39 72 20 27 28 27 .28 26 .35 1 .1 0 .8

 Milnor city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 653 711 651 350 338 307 1 .01 0 .94 694 .7 372 .3

 Milnor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 97 111 44 42 40 34 .21 32 .64 3 .0 1 .3

 Ransom township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 78 107 31 36 44 35 .20 35 .06 1 .6 0 .9

 Rutland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 220 212 98 102 115 0 .38 0 .38 428 .9 257 .9

 Rutland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 83 65 28 28 30 35 .67 35 .42 1 .6 0 .8

 Sargent township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 49 75 24 23 30 35 .88 35 .88 0 .9 0 .7

 Shuman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 79 80 32 33 40 35 .65 34 .92 1 .7 0 .9

 Southwest township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 24 37 9 9 16 36 .10 36 .01 0 .5 0 .2

 Taylor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 42 44 16 21 23 36 .23 36 .03 1 .1 0 .4

 Tewaukon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 71 76 29 29 28 39 .04 37 .50 1 .4 0 .8

 Verner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 51 58 18 21 30 35 .78 35 .38 1 .2 0 .5

 Vivian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 109 151 60 58 64 35 .59 35 .10 4 .0 1 .7

 Weber township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 87 104 32 37 42 40 .27 39 .73 1 .8 0 .8

 Whitestone Hill township . . . . . . . . . 85 98 97 39 38 39 33 .30 33 .22 2 .6 1 .2

 Willey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 109 94 37 42 39 35 .64 35 .50 2 .8 1 .0

Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,321 1,710 2,148 894 924 1,061 1,005 .64 972 .38 1 .4 0 .9

 Berlin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 58 60 22 23 27 36 .05 34 .49 1 .2 0 .6

 Boone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 24 35 13 16 22 35 .92 35 .27 0 .5 0 .4

 Denhoff township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 27 56 33 28 38 36 .08 34 .18 0 .9 1 .0

 Denhoff CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) 0 .66 0 .66 30 .3 31 .8

 Edgemont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 9 18 8 10 8 36 .25 35 .49 0 .5 0 .2

 Fairview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 8 33 4 4 12 35 .18 34 .98 0 .2 0 .1

 Goodrich city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 163 192 107 113 122 0 .29 0 .28 350 .0 382 .1

 Goodrich township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 36 81 23 27 48 35 .71 33 .51 0 .9 0 .7

 Highland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 23 55 12 15 23 36 .03 35 .27 0 .5 0 .3

 Lincoln Dale township . . . . . . . . . . . 27 31 38 15 17 19 35 .24 34 .99 0 .8 0 .4

 McClusky city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 415 492 278 247 267 0 .39 0 .39 974 .4 712 .8

 McClusky township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 73 85 31 35 35 35 .73 35 .26 1 .6 0 .9

 Martin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 96 117 43 48 56 0 .09 0 .09 866 .7 477 .8

 Martin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 72 69 30 30 30 35 .91 34 .73 1 .2 0 .9

 Mauch township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 26 31 10 15 14 36 .13 32 .76 0 .2 0 .3

 North Sheridan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 292 66 74 155 29 27 328 .13 319 .48 0 .9 0 .5

 Pickard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 37 49 17 19 19 36 .04 34 .82 0 .8 0 .5

 Prophets township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 38 (X) 15 17 (X) 36 .04 35 .48 0 .6 0 .4

 Rosenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 46 58 19 19 24 35 .92 33 .81 1 .0 0 .6

 South Sheridan UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 98 116 36 45 57 138 .56 134 .73 0 .5 0 .3

 Strassburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 50 61 23 25 31 35 .96 32 .35 1 .1 0 .7

Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,153 4,044 3,761 1,311 1,216 1,175 1,128 .25 1,094 .09 3 .8 1 .2

 Fort Yates city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 228 183 73 78 78 0 .06 0 .06 3,066 .7 1,216 .7

 Fort Yates UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,239 2,073 1,913 641 568 517 188 .03 167 .50 13 .4 3 .8

 Menz township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 29 39 15 14 19 46 .74 46 .70 0 .6 0 .3

 North Sioux UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,200 1,114 926 335 287 256 323 .07 309 .95 3 .9 1 .1

 Cannon Ball CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 864 702 227 208 180 96 .67 88 .27 9 .9 2 .6

 Porcupine CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 (X) (X) 40 (X) (X) 0 .20 0 .20 730 .0 200 .0

 Selfridge city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 223 242 76 85 108 0 .27 0 .27 592 .6 281 .5

 Solen city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 86 92 44 43 42 0 .30 0 .30 276 .7 146 .7

 Southwest Sioux UT . . . . . . . . . . . . 259 291 366 127 141 155 569 .77 569 .30 0 .5 0 .2

Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 727 767 907 436 451 481 1,219 .16 1,214 .92 0 .6 0 .4

 Amidon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 24 17 17 22 0 .64 0 .64 31 .3 26 .6

 Bucklin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 9 8 8 6 5 32 .20 32 .17 0 .6 0 .2

 Carroll township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 13 20 8 7 13 35 .99 35 .99 0 .3 0 .2

 Cash township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 23 24 13 10 8 36 .03 35 .69 0 .9 0 .4

 Cedar Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 25 31 36 13 18 18 36 .03 35 .74 0 .7 0 .4

 Central Slope UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) 9 (X) (X) 71 .75 71 .67 0 .3 0 .1

 Connor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 26 30 17 17 18 35 .89 35 .82 0 .8 0 .5

 Crawford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 25 31 16 10 12 35 .94 35 .89 0 .9 0 .4

 Deep Creek UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 23 27 11 10 11 35 .87 35 .70 0 .6 0 .3

 Harper township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7 7 4 8 7 35 .73 35 .67 0 .1 0 .1

 Hughes township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 12 11 5 6 4 35 .33 35 .10 0 .2 0 .1

 Hume township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 23 25 17 16 16 35 .48 35 .48 0 .7 0 .5
32 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Slope County—Con .

 Marmarth city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 140 144 93 101 99 2 .53 2 .50 54 .4 37 .2

 Mineral Springs township . . . . . . . . . 23 27 37 13 15 13 35 .92 35 .89 0 .6 0 .4

 Moord township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 24 17 9 10 12 35 .32 35 .28 0 .5 0 .3

 Mound township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 9 13 7 10 9 35 .86 35 .79 0 .2 0 .2

 Northeast Slope UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 (X) (X) 39 (X) (X) 72 .69 72 .64 1 .0 0 .5

 Northwest Slope UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 60 74 33 28 31 195 .75 194 .34 0 .3 0 .2

 Peaceful Valley township . . . . . . . . . 19 31 30 14 14 16 36 .93 36 .89 0 .5 0 .4

 Rainy Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 31 29 18 18 23 35 .85 35 .85 0 .8 0 .5

 Richland Center township . . . . . . . . 5 5 7 6 5 5 35 .66 35 .63 0 .1 0 .2

 Sand Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 35 49 18 20 19 70 .99 70 .85 0 .5 0 .3

 Sheets township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 32 46 12 14 18 35 .94 35 .83 0 .6 0 .3

 West Slope UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 25 10 12 11 127 .06 126 .36 0 .1 0 .1

 White Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 21 27 11 13 14 35 .86 35 .58 0 .6 0 .3

 Woodberry township . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 24 30 15 17 18 35 .92 35 .92 0 .9 0 .4

Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,199 22,636 22,832 10,735 9,722 9,585 1,340 .19 1,334 .74 18 .1 8 .0

 Belfield city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800 866 887 418 439 455 1 .09 1 .08 740 .7 387 .0

 Dickinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,787 16,010 16,097 7,865 7,033 6,838 10 .03 9 .96 1,785 .8 789 .7

 Dickinson North UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,616 2,506 2,315 1,055 904 813 270 .42 268 .26 9 .8 3 .9

 Dickinson South UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . 516 561 601 217 206 225 205 .23 204 .95 2 .5 1 .1

 East Stark UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 667 736 904 310 309 389 548 .19 545 .93 1 .2 0 .6

 Gladstone city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 248 224 113 106 96 0 .35 0 .34 702 .9 332 .4

 Richardton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529 619 625 285 285 290 0 .36 0 .36 1,469 .4 791 .7

 South Heart city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 307 322 129 119 122 0 .95 0 .94 320 .2 137 .2

 Taylor city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 150 163 96 83 99 0 .50 0 .50 296 .0 192 .0

 West Stark UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 596 633 594 247 238 258 303 .06 302 .40 2 .0 0 .8

Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,975 2,258 2,420 1,171 1,231 1,311 715 .46 712 .22 2 .8 1 .6

 Beaver Creek township . . . . . . . . . . 77 84 114 40 40 43 35 .62 34 .70 2 .2 1 .2

 Broadlawn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 42 59 23 22 27 35 .31 35 .25 1 .2 0 .7

 Carpenter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 45 53 23 27 26 35 .02 35 .02 1 .5 0 .7

 Colgate township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 93 98 34 40 40 35 .39 35 .39 2 .6 1 .0

 Easton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 62 78 26 32 35 36 .05 36 .03 1 .5 0 .7

 Edendale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 60 72 26 29 30 36 .01 36 .01 1 .7 0 .7

 Enger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 80 98 37 35 45 35 .80 35 .78 2 .1 1 .0

 Finley city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 515 543 245 256 289 3 .47 3 .47 128 .2 70 .6

 Finley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 64 65 26 27 30 32 .46 32 .39 1 .6 0 .8

 Franklin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 41 49 24 24 23 35 .99 35 .84 1 .1 0 .7

 Golden Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 59 73 68 171 172 157 36 .01 34 .85 1 .7 4 .9

 Greenview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 38 64 20 27 26 36 .03 35 .99 1 .2 0 .6

 Hope city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 258 303 281 155 155 163 0 .62 0 .62 416 .1 250 .0

 Hugo township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 62 61 21 22 25 35 .86 35 .86 1 .2 0 .6

 Luverne city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 44 41 21 23 23 0 .26 0 .26 119 .2 80 .8

 Melrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 63 73 22 28 31 36 .04 35 .88 1 .1 0 .6

 Newburgh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 113 102 39 45 49 35 .75 35 .75 2 .5 1 .1

 Primrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 95 90 31 37 41 35 .92 35 .92 2 .0 0 .9

 Riverside township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 41 55 20 22 26 36 .13 36 .05 1 .1 0 .6

 Sharon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 109 119 73 76 79 1 .55 1 .54 62 .3 47 .4

 Sharon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 44 44 16 18 20 33 .84 33 .81 1 .4 0 .5

 Sherbrooke township . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 62 59 24 25 26 35 .98 35 .98 1 .4 0 .7

 Westfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 70 73 28 29 31 35 .40 35 .38 1 .7 0 .8

 Willow Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 55 61 26 20 26 34 .94 34 .44 1 .6 0 .8

Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21,100 21,908 22,241 9,862 9,817 9,770 2,297 .91 2,221 .72 9 .5 4 .4

 Alexander township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 28 49 12 13 17 35 .90 35 .61 0 .7 0 .3

 Ashland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 76 86 32 32 33 35 .41 33 .97 1 .9 0 .9

 Bloom township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 554 609 511 208 189 178 34 .35 33 .78 16 .4 6 .2

 Bloomenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . 34 45 51 19 16 18 36 .02 34 .28 1 .0 0 .6

 Buchanan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 77 40 34 29 15 0 .08 0 .08 1,125 .0 425 .0

 Buchanan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 102 123 42 39 50 35 .87 33 .90 2 .9 1 .2

 Chase Lake UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3 6 2 1 3 35 .80 30 .95 0 .1 0 .1

 Chicago township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 54 55 24 23 25 35 .60 33 .73 1 .4 0 .7

 Cleveland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 112 121 54 59 58 0 .18 0 .18 461 .1 300 .0

 Conklin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 12 16 6 5 8 35 .88 34 .30 0 .3 0 .2

 Corinne township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 60 38 19 24 24 35 .59 35 .49 1 .2 0 .5

 Corwin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 118 95 42 51 47 36 .03 36 .03 2 .8 1 .2

 Ypsilanti CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 23 (X) (X) 9 (X) (X) 0 .06 0 .06 383 .3 150 .0
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 33

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Stutsman County—Con .

 Courtenay city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 53 70 26 30 40 0 .44 0 .44 102 .3 59 .1

 Courtenay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 31 58 17 18 20 35 .49 35 .24 1 .0 0 .5

 Cusator township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 36 58 17 20 21 35 .57 34 .88 0 .7 0 .5

 Deer Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 28 30 13 14 15 35 .88 34 .45 0 .8 0 .4

 Durham township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 62 77 29 28 28 35 .96 35 .45 1 .4 0 .8

 Edmunds township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 43 74 21 28 35 35 .41 34 .77 1 .0 0 .6

 Eldridge township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 154 162 64 69 66 35 .74 34 .74 3 .5 1 .8

 Flint township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 66 53 20 25 23 35 .52 32 .89 1 .2 0 .6

 Fried township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 183 177 84 71 86 36 .00 35 .33 4 .4 2 .4

 Gerber township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 10 19 7 7 11 35 .68 33 .58 0 .3 0 .2

 Germania township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 29 45 14 17 20 35 .94 35 .61 0 .5 0 .4

 Glacier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 29 46 14 14 19 35 .64 34 .67 0 .6 0 .4

 Gray township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 41 55 18 16 22 34 .62 33 .74 1 .2 0 .5

 Griffin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 51 68 28 27 29 36 .03 35 .91 1 .4 0 .8

 Hidden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 43 58 21 19 22 36 .02 35 .30 1 .4 0 .6

 Homer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 289 331 312 123 125 118 34 .07 34 .07 8 .5 3 .6

 Iosco township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 16 15 8 8 7 35 .89 33 .60 0 .5 0 .2

 Jamestown city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,427 15,527 15,571 6,983 6,970 6,740 12 .88 12 .83 1,202 .4 544 .3

 Jim River Valley township . . . . . . . . . 38 45 61 20 18 20 35 .88 34 .13 1 .1 0 .6

 Kensal city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 161 191 83 86 93 0 .60 0 .60 271 .7 138 .3

 Kensal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 58 48 21 21 22 34 .92 32 .21 1 .4 0 .7

 Lenton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 62 72 29 26 28 36 .19 36 .18 1 .8 0 .8

 Lippert township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 111 110 37 37 45 36 .16 35 .75 2 .7 1 .0

 Lowery township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 36 48 16 19 25 35 .32 34 .21 1 .0 0 .5

 Lyon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 27 25 10 11 14 35 .85 33 .03 0 .6 0 .3

 Manns township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 61 74 33 30 30 36 .09 36 .08 2 .2 0 .9

 Marstonmoor township . . . . . . . . . . . 23 26 39 12 12 15 35 .87 34 .50 0 .7 0 .3

 Medina city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 335 387 182 209 213 1 .02 1 .02 302 .0 178 .4

 Midway township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 579 636 599 276 256 253 28 .61 26 .75 21 .6 10 .3

 Montpelier city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 103 82 46 45 40 0 .18 0 .18 483 .3 255 .6

 Montpelier township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 82 76 30 31 28 35 .82 35 .82 2 .0 0 .8

 Moon Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 65 78 26 25 28 35 .04 34 .34 1 .9 0 .8

 Newbury township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 61 56 21 22 26 36 .09 34 .62 1 .5 0 .6

 Nogosek township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 37 43 18 17 18 35 .51 35 .04 0 .6 0 .5

 Northwest Stutsman UT . . . . . . . . . . 15 26 24 9 9 10 35 .78 34 .33 0 .4 0 .3

 Paris township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 23 42 16 18 21 35 .93 32 .79 0 .7 0 .5

 Peterson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 40 56 18 17 21 36 .25 34 .51 1 .0 0 .5

 Pingree city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 66 61 29 32 36 0 .18 0 .18 333 .3 161 .1

 Pingree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49 45 42 21 22 21 35 .67 34 .96 1 .4 0 .6

 Pipestem Valley township . . . . . . . . . 35 38 50 24 20 30 35 .84 35 .61 1 .0 0 .7

 Plainview township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 45 63 26 26 26 35 .96 35 .91 1 .1 0 .7

 Rose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 71 76 29 24 30 36 .03 35 .08 2 .1 0 .8

 Round Top township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 17 32 10 7 9 35 .83 33 .66 0 .3 0 .3

 St . Paul township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 79 71 33 27 29 35 .98 32 .22 2 .2 1 .0

 Severn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 76 55 23 26 23 36 .16 35 .98 1 .4 0 .6

 Sharlow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 72 70 23 24 23 36 .25 36 .21 1 .5 0 .6

 Sinclair township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 33 39 15 16 17 35 .90 34 .20 0 .9 0 .4

 Spiritwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 103 99 42 43 43 36 .09 35 .76 2 .0 1 .2

 Spiritwood CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) 19 (X) (X) 0 .88 0 .88 20 .5 21 .6

 Spiritwood Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 72 61 99 63 96 1 .79 1 .07 84 .1 92 .5

 Stirton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 83 82 33 36 32 35 .87 32 .89 2 .1 1 .0

 Streeter city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 172 161 125 125 140 0 .35 0 .35 485 .7 357 .1

 Streeter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 63 62 36 33 33 35 .75 34 .80 1 .6 1 .0

 Strong township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 28 60 16 17 31 35 .61 33 .73 0 .6 0 .5

 Sydney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 93 92 40 42 42 36 .26 36 .13 2 .2 1 .1

 Valley Spring township . . . . . . . . . . . 19 27 33 11 12 15 36 .01 33 .80 0 .6 0 .3

 Wadsworth township . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 38 35 13 15 16 35 .60 32 .67 0 .7 0 .4

 Walters township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 65 69 25 24 26 35 .61 35 .47 1 .2 0 .7

 Weld township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 36 39 18 22 21 36 .32 33 .95 0 .9 0 .5

 Windsor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 43 58 27 23 28 34 .95 34 .21 1 .7 0 .8

 Winfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 75 81 33 30 31 36 .16 36 .07 2 .3 0 .9

 Woodbury township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 196 244 89 85 86 34 .84 34 .68 6 .0 2 .6

 Woodworth city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 80 102 52 56 63 0 .22 0 .22 227 .3 236 .4

 Ypsilanti township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 168 154 66 71 75 36 .03 36 .03 3 .6 1 .8

 Ypsilanti CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 81 (X) (X) 43 (X) (X) 0 .49 0 .49 165 .3 87 .8
34 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,246 2,876 3,627 1,449 1,558 1,770 1,041 .48 1,024 .56 2 .2 1 .4

 Armourdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 65 66 24 27 29 36 .06 35 .73 1 .3 0 .7

 Atkins township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 33 52 15 16 19 36 .06 35 .11 1 .0 0 .4

 Bethel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 25 24 13 13 21 35 .95 35 .67 0 .9 0 .4

 Bisbee city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 167 227 97 102 121 0 .26 0 .26 484 .6 373 .1

 Cando city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,115 1,342 1,564 701 707 722 0 .63 0 .63 1,769 .8 1,112 .7

 Cando township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 84 119 37 40 50 35 .53 35 .12 2 .3 1 .1

 Coolin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 20 45 12 15 19 36 .04 35 .87 1 .1 0 .3

 Crocus township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 54 69 24 25 29 35 .99 35 .05 1 .3 0 .7

 Dash township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 45 56 22 28 35 45 .07 44 .30 0 .6 0 .5

 Egeland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 49 103 42 48 51 0 .38 0 .38 73 .7 110 .5

 Gerrard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 38 39 11 16 22 35 .87 35 .51 0 .4 0 .3

 Grainfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 52 57 21 28 35 35 .72 35 .63 1 .0 0 .6

 Hansboro city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 8 20 14 13 16 0 .19 0 .19 63 .2 73 .7

 Howell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 53 73 19 23 25 35 .99 35 .67 0 .8 0 .5

 Lansing township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 7 13 5 10 18 36 .26 36 .13 0 .1 0 .1

 Maza township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 21 36 17 19 20 36 .18 35 .04 0 .4 0 .5

 Monroe township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 36 30 14 16 20 36 .01 35 .98 0 .8 0 .4

 Mount View township . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 59 64 25 24 25 35 .84 35 .28 1 .5 0 .7

 New City township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 27 34 12 13 23 35 .72 35 .69 0 .5 0 .3

 Olson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 37 58 19 22 32 35 .99 35 .03 0 .5 0 .5

 Paulson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 39 58 15 18 22 36 .06 34 .91 0 .9 0 .4

 Perth city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 13 22 6 6 13 0 .13 0 .13 69 .2 46 .2

 Picton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 49 50 18 19 24 44 .33 44 .11 0 .6 0 .4

 Rocklake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 194 221 103 116 129 0 .22 0 .22 459 .1 468 .2

 Rock Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 25 36 11 15 17 35 .61 33 .41 0 .4 0 .3

 Sarles city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 3 1 2 2 0 .02 0 .02 200 .0 50 .0

 Sidney township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 53 87 22 22 30 44 .36 43 .98 1 .1 0 .5

 Smith township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 17 46 11 15 23 43 .96 43 .29 0 .4 0 .3

 Sorenson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 26 46 14 16 27 35 .77 35 .11 0 .6 0 .4

 Springfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 35 47 23 23 27 36 .07 34 .65 0 .4 0 .7

 Teddy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 43 82 20 23 28 36 .09 35 .85 1 .0 0 .6

 Twin Hill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 45 44 19 19 19 35 .81 34 .91 1 .1 0 .5

 Victor township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 24 23 12 13 20 35 .60 34 .83 0 .7 0 .3

 Virginia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 21 51 9 17 21 35 .70 34 .97 0 .4 0 .3

 Zion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 62 50 21 24 30 36 .03 35 .91 1 .4 0 .6

Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,121 8,477 8,752 3,780 3,708 3,770 862 .51 861 .95 9 .4 4 .4

 Belmont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 64 77 32 30 40 25 .01 25 .01 3 .0 1 .3

 Bingham township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 86 108 37 42 51 30 .09 30 .04 2 .3 1 .2

 Blanchard township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 84 117 41 38 46 36 .01 36 .01 2 .4 1 .1

 Blanchard CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . 26 (X) (X) 11 (X) (X) 0 .23 0 .23 113 .0 47 .8

 Bloomfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 138 153 55 54 60 36 .06 36 .06 3 .6 1 .5

 Blanchard CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . – (X) (X) – (X) (X) 0 .03 0 .03 – –

 Bohnsack township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 65 64 27 28 29 35 .06 35 .06 1 .6 0 .8

 Buxton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 350 343 144 141 143 0 .20 0 .20 1,615 .0 720 .0

 Buxton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 112 81 42 46 36 35 .11 35 .11 3 .0 1 .2

 Caledonia township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 132 154 54 50 62 29 .54 29 .54 3 .8 1 .8

 Caledonia CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) 0 .52 0 .52 75 .0 38 .5

 Clifford city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 51 51 23 26 23 0 .14 0 .14 314 .3 164 .3

 Eldorado township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 132 175 51 56 68 36 .18 35 .81 3 .0 1 .4

 Elm River township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 52 47 18 19 32 28 .99 28 .99 1 .1 0 .6

 Ervin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 165 178 75 75 76 36 .42 36 .40 4 .4 2 .1

 Galesburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 157 161 64 76 82 0 .17 0 .17 635 .3 376 .5

 Galesburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 107 127 44 49 49 34 .97 34 .88 2 .4 1 .3

 Garfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 212 170 71 75 66 34 .93 34 .93 4 .8 2 .0

 Grandin city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – – – 0 .02 0 .02 – –

 Greenfield township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 65 56 27 26 26 35 .34 35 .34 2 .0 0 .8

 Hatton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 777 707 800 394 331 334 0 .61 0 .61 1,273 .8 645 .9

 Herberg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 89 124 27 31 42 33 .76 33 .72 1 .9 0 .8

 Hillsboro city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,603 1,563 1,488 763 727 714 1 .09 1 .09 1,470 .6 700 .0

 Hillsboro township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 122 106 63 47 47 34 .81 34 .81 3 .8 1 .8

 Kelso township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 91 96 33 37 41 35 .07 35 .07 2 .0 0 .9

 Lindaas township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 105 127 46 48 50 34 .89 34 .89 3 .3 1 .3

 Mayville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,858 1,953 2,092 872 876 866 1 .92 1 .92 967 .7 454 .2

 Mayville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 151 159 55 54 60 34 .92 34 .92 3 .8 1 .6

 Morgan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 99 111 39 49 49 35 .94 35 .94 2 .5 1 .1
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 35

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Traill County—Con .

 Norman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 57 77 29 28 33 35 .83 35 .83 2 .1 0 .8

 Norway township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 155 172 67 58 70 35 .70 35 .70 4 .7 1 .9

 Portland city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 606 604 602 297 286 268 0 .86 0 .86 704 .7 345 .3

 Reynolds city (part) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 224 192 83 86 78 0 .43 0 .43 483 .7 193 .0

 Roseville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 127 115 42 46 48 35 .55 35 .55 3 .1 1 .2

 Stavanger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 125 115 44 47 48 36 .20 36 .20 3 .0 1 .2

 Viking township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 204 170 72 78 80 34 .83 34 .83 4 .9 2 .1

 Wold township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 129 144 49 48 53 35 .85 35 .85 2 .8 1 .4

Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,119 12,389 13,840 5,498 5,757 6,093 1,294 .10 1,281 .93 8 .7 4 .3

 Acton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 109 154 45 48 64 38 .07 37 .64 2 .6 1 .2

 Adams city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 203 248 98 118 146 1 .02 1 .00 127 .0 98 .0

 Adams township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 69 64 28 31 35 35 .01 34 .33 1 .3 0 .8

 Ardoch city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 61 49 39 41 29 0 .26 0 .26 257 .7 150 .0

 Ardoch township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 93 115 35 37 53 35 .45 34 .02 2 .0 1 .0

 Cleveland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 99 123 39 40 44 35 .96 35 .75 2 .1 1 .1

 Conway city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 23 24 15 11 15 0 .22 0 .22 104 .5 68 .2

 Dewey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 43 48 18 20 29 36 .06 35 .61 1 .1 0 .5

 Dundee township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 107 123 58 68 64 35 .98 35 .98 2 .5 1 .6

 Eden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 56 72 23 22 27 35 .81 35 .81 1 .2 0 .6

 Edinburg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 252 284 125 132 137 0 .31 0 .31 632 .3 403 .2

 Fairdale city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 51 76 33 38 43 0 .31 0 .31 122 .6 106 .5

 Farmington township . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 177 204 81 82 101 36 .30 36 .30 4 .8 2 .2

 Auburn CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) 1 .01 1 .01 47 .5 20 .8

 Nash CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 (X) (X) 13 (X) (X) 1 .02 1 .02 31 .4 12 .7

 Fertile township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 250 246 285 94 100 107 36 .10 36 .10 6 .9 2 .6

 Fordville city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 266 299 121 131 138 1 .01 1 .01 209 .9 119 .8

 Forest River city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 154 148 59 68 69 0 .50 0 .50 250 .0 118 .0

 Forest River township . . . . . . . . . . . 63 100 136 31 47 49 35 .65 35 .65 1 .8 0 .9

 Glenwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 201 213 245 98 103 109 35 .73 35 .73 5 .6 2 .7

 Golden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 101 131 48 47 52 36 .00 35 .80 2 .8 1 .3

 Grafton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,284 4,516 4,884 1,990 2,005 2,051 3 .40 3 .40 1,260 .0 585 .3

 Grafton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 288 327 369 118 136 126 34 .21 34 .21 8 .4 3 .4

 Harriston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 162 172 67 79 81 34 .35 34 .35 3 .8 2 .0

 Hoople city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 292 310 135 148 145 0 .36 0 .36 672 .2 375 .0

 Kensington township . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 262 291 108 100 96 33 .86 33 .79 7 .2 3 .2

 Kinloss township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 56 75 23 25 33 35 .72 35 .32 0 .9 0 .7

 Lampton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 107 169 50 54 74 35 .68 35 .64 3 .0 1 .4

 Lankin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 131 152 72 83 89 0 .35 0 .35 280 .0 205 .7

 Latona township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 55 82 30 27 33 36 .21 35 .08 1 .6 0 .9

 Martin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 112 114 44 43 59 34 .94 34 .16 3 .3 1 .3

 Medford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 69 78 31 33 33 34 .94 34 .94 1 .8 0 .9

 Minto city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 604 657 560 294 298 255 1 .42 1 .42 425 .4 207 .0

 Norton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 111 115 37 42 50 35 .82 35 .71 1 .9 1 .0

 Oakwood township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 228 300 304 100 107 123 33 .53 33 .53 6 .8 3 .0

 Ops township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 77 74 30 31 37 36 .02 36 .02 1 .7 0 .8

 Park River city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,403 1,535 1,725 734 760 793 2 .17 2 .17 646 .5 338 .2

 Perth township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 63 84 25 29 33 35 .94 34 .70 1 .5 0 .7

 Pisek city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 96 130 60 60 71 0 .12 0 .12 883 .3 500 .0

 Prairie Centre township . . . . . . . . . . 107 111 (X) 49 58 (X) 36 .19 36 .19 3 .0 1 .4

 Pulaski township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 106 119 39 52 64 34 .48 34 .14 2 .6 1 .1

 Rushford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 90 124 37 40 46 36 .01 36 .01 2 .4 1 .0

 St . Andrews township . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 55 68 39 37 39 36 .81 36 .34 1 .4 1 .1

 Sauter township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 48 61 29 30 32 35 .99 34 .83 1 .1 0 .8

 Shepherd township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 36 55 18 21 29 36 .14 34 .63 1 .1 0 .5

 Silvesta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 56 75 28 32 35 35 .92 35 .15 1 .1 0 .8

 Tiber township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 98 124 44 47 51 35 .90 35 .80 2 .0 1 .2

 Vernon township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88 92 124 40 45 49 36 .08 36 .08 2 .4 1 .1

 Vesta township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 48 44 17 20 27 36 .04 35 .86 0 .9 0 .5

 Walsh Centre township . . . . . . . . . . 154 156 208 69 71 90 36 .22 36 .22 4 .3 1 .9

 Walshville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 142 191 53 60 67 33 .53 33 .10 3 .4 1 .6

Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,675 58,795 57,921 26,744 25,097 23,585 2,055 .96 2,013 .28 30 .6 13 .3

 Afton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 609 515 506 228 201 174 35 .65 35 .49 17 .2 6 .4

 Anna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 35 37 16 17 18 36 .43 35 .12 0 .8 0 .5

 Baden township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 43 48 23 22 19 35 .69 34 .75 1 .0 0 .7
36 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Ward County—Con .

 Berthold city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454 466 409 178 181 171 0 .37 0 .37 1,227 .0 481 .1

 Berthold township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 58 83 33 29 38 36 .13 35 .86 2 .1 0 .9

 Brillian township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 68 43 25 27 20 36 .21 36 .20 1 .6 0 .7

 Burlington city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,060 1,096 995 410 388 372 0 .64 0 .64 1,656 .3 640 .6

 Burlington township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 388 356 288 153 135 106 35 .37 35 .31 11 .0 4 .3

 Burt township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 94 90 42 40 38 36 .12 35 .69 2 .9 1 .2

 Cameron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 40 42 17 22 22 35 .52 34 .60 1 .0 0 .5

 Carbondale township . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 59 64 29 33 40 35 .52 35 .51 1 .3 0 .8

 Carpio city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 148 178 83 90 94 0 .59 0 .59 266 .1 140 .7

 Carpio township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 62 63 26 27 32 35 .75 35 .75 1 .9 0 .7

 Denmark township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 77 65 33 37 34 35 .91 33 .73 2 .7 1 .0

 Des Lacs city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 209 216 78 76 74 0 .56 0 .53 384 .9 147 .2

 Des Lacs township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 114 90 38 45 35 35 .37 35 .10 2 .4 1 .1

 Donnybrook city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 90 106 37 46 59 0 .70 0 .70 84 .3 52 .9

 Douglas city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 64 93 40 44 45 0 .31 0 .29 220 .7 137 .9

 Elmdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 89 64 27 35 31 35 .98 35 .52 1 .4 0 .8

 Eureka township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 335 305 156 144 128 36 .47 35 .98 10 .2 4 .3

 Ruthville CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 47 (X) (X) 27 (X) (X) 0 .11 0 .11 427 .3 245 .5

 Evergreen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 6 8 3 4 5 35 .83 33 .56 0 .2 0 .1

 Foxholm township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 91 88 66 61 60 36 .37 36 .37 3 .3 1 .8

 Foxholm CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 (X) (X) 38 (X) (X) 0 .96 0 .96 78 .1 39 .6

 Freedom township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 135 127 143 61 59 60 36 .05 35 .42 3 .8 1 .7

 Gasman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 123 100 66 51 56 36 .16 34 .97 4 .5 1 .9

 Greely township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 23 37 15 16 18 35 .85 34 .82 0 .5 0 .4

 Greenbush township . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 44 15 19 23 35 .80 35 .80 0 .6 0 .4

 Harrison township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,872 1,402 1,268 710 518 454 22 .49 22 .46 83 .3 31 .6

 Hiddenwood township . . . . . . . . . . . 24 33 60 21 21 29 35 .91 35 .37 0 .7 0 .6

 Hilton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 49 49 24 21 24 36 .22 35 .88 1 .5 0 .7

 Iota Flat township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 55 85 22 26 30 36 .11 35 .38 1 .1 0 .6

 Kenmare city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,096 1,081 1,214 558 553 637 1 .24 1 .24 883 .9 450 .0

 Kenmare township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 97 106 45 42 42 34 .52 33 .31 3 .1 1 .4

 Kirkelie township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436 401 372 170 147 137 36 .45 36 .39 12 .0 4 .7

 Linton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 38 35 14 17 16 36 .01 34 .48 0 .9 0 .4

 Lund township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 42 49 23 22 23 36 .00 34 .80 1 .4 0 .7

 McKinley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 140 152 60 56 53 36 .53 36 .48 3 .8 1 .6

 Makoti city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 145 145 87 89 92 0 .20 0 .20 770 .0 435 .0

 Mandan township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 56 65 22 17 18 35 .86 34 .17 1 .5 0 .6

 Margaret township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 124 67 37 34 34 36 .10 36 .03 2 .4 1 .0

 Maryland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 78 85 26 27 27 36 .30 36 .19 1 .9 0 .7

 Mayland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 42 57 23 22 23 35 .90 35 .79 2 .0 0 .6

 Minot city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,888 36,567 34,544 18,744 16,475 15,040 17 .45 17 .43 2,345 .8 1,075 .4

 Nedrose township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,252 2,149 2,077 892 821 753 32 .24 31 .56 71 .4 28 .3

 Newman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 62 85 28 38 38 36 .08 35 .88 1 .5 0 .8

 New Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 218 221 90 75 76 36 .06 35 .98 6 .6 2 .5

 Orlien township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 47 53 26 26 26 36 .36 35 .64 1 .3 0 .7

 Passport township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 51 51 18 18 21 36 .50 33 .41 1 .4 0 .5

 Ree township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 30 38 13 21 24 36 .07 34 .22 0 .6 0 .4

 Rice Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 53 54 173 177 166 36 .25 34 .41 1 .9 5 .0

 Rolling Green township . . . . . . . . . . 85 93 96 39 38 38 35 .88 34 .12 2 .5 1 .1

 Rushville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81 97 81 30 31 38 35 .86 35 .21 2 .3 0 .9

 Ryder city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 92 121 62 67 72 0 .34 0 .33 257 .6 187 .9

 Ryder township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 61 53 20 29 25 35 .51 34 .86 1 .0 0 .6

 St . Marys township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 42 51 21 20 25 36 .13 34 .89 1 .5 0 .6

 Sauk Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . . 23 29 38 13 14 19 35 .87 35 .81 0 .6 0 .4

 Sawyer city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 377 319 150 162 143 0 .48 0 .48 743 .8 312 .5

 Sawyer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 196 174 76 76 71 35 .55 35 .50 5 .2 2 .1

 Shealy township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 41 (X) 14 16 (X) 35 .97 35 .15 0 .8 0 .4

 Spencer township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 59 100 30 36 37 35 .95 34 .97 1 .3 0 .9

 Spring Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 35 36 15 14 15 35 .88 34 .71 0 .8 0 .4

 Sundre township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 970 1,006 900 384 376 323 35 .96 35 .72 27 .2 10 .8

 Logan CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 (X) (X) 79 (X) (X) 1 .47 1 .46 132 .9 54 .1

 Surrey city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 917 856 335 313 302 0 .99 0 .98 953 .1 341 .8

 Surrey township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 284 253 121 102 89 35 .06 35 .02 10 .0 3 .5

 Tatman township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,992 4,220 6,126 1,012 1,519 1,533 36 .08 35 .92 83 .3 28 .2

 Minot AFB CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 2,766 3,986 5,866 892 1,393 1,410 2 .11 2 .00 1,383 .0 446 .0

 Ruthville CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . . . 144 (X) (X) 87 (X) (X) 0 .05 0 .05 2,880 .0 1,740 .0
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 37

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Ward County—Con .

 Tolgen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 16 29 16 11 12 35 .89 33 .68 0 .9 0 .5

 Torning township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 48 54 27 27 25 36 .18 34 .40 1 .9 0 .8

 Vang township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 49 57 20 21 18 35 .94 34 .28 1 .2 0 .6

 Waterford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,807 3,659 3,277 591 1,070 1,186 36 .14 35 .82 78 .4 16 .5

 Minot AFB CDP (part) . . . . . . . . . 2,755 3,613 3,229 571 1,048 1,165 5 .56 5 .35 515 .0 106 .7

 Willis township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 100 115 44 43 42 36 .08 36 .06 2 .9 1 .2

Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,207 5,102 5,864 2,481 2,643 2,869 1,290 .37 1,271 .05 3 .3 2 .0

 Berlin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 38 54 17 19 26 36 .04 34 .78 0 .8 0 .5

 Bilodeau township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 46 61 18 21 24 35 .78 35 .57 1 .2 0 .5

 Bowdon city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 139 196 94 104 121 0 .25 0 .25 524 .0 376 .0

 Bremen township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 67 108 32 33 54 36 .06 35 .83 1 .3 0 .9

 Bull Moose township . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 51 67 21 24 27 35 .65 33 .51 1 .0 0 .6

 Cathay city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 56 54 29 37 36 0 .18 0 .18 238 .9 161 .1

 Cathay township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 63 61 29 31 35 35 .74 35 .65 1 .6 0 .8

 Chaseley township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 54 68 29 37 38 35 .97 35 .16 1 .1 0 .8

 Crystal Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 32 37 45 18 19 17 35 .95 35 .52 0 .9 0 .5

 Delger township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 36 52 19 21 24 35 .98 35 .77 0 .7 0 .5

 Fairville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 53 53 18 21 24 35 .39 35 .36 1 .0 0 .5

 Fessenden city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 625 655 289 306 345 0 .45 0 .45 1,064 .4 642 .2

 Forward township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 96 105 40 42 41 36 .06 35 .57 2 .2 1 .1

 Fram township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 69 95 38 35 40 36 .00 35 .97 1 .6 1 .1

 Germantown township . . . . . . . . . . . 29 35 51 19 19 23 35 .27 35 .08 0 .8 0 .5

 Haaland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 54 59 26 28 28 35 .56 35 .35 1 .3 0 .7

 Hamberg city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 28 19 15 15 16 0 .40 0 .40 52 .5 37 .5

 Hamburg township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 67 61 20 26 30 35 .98 35 .25 1 .1 0 .6

 Harvey city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,783 1,989 2,263 997 1,056 1,060 1 .88 1 .88 948 .4 530 .3

 Hawksnest township . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 38 45 12 20 18 36 .08 35 .92 0 .6 0 .3

 Heimdal township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 62 85 58 48 59 35 .98 35 .59 1 .6 1 .6

 Heimdal CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 (X) (X) 33 (X) (X) 0 .47 0 .47 57 .4 70 .2

 Hillsdale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107 136 149 49 52 48 35 .88 35 .71 3 .0 1 .4

 Hurdsfield city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 91 92 61 65 71 0 .27 0 .27 311 .1 225 .9

 Johnson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 60 57 15 19 23 36 .21 35 .30 1 .0 0 .4

 Lynn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 40 35 12 13 15 36 .16 34 .71 0 .6 0 .3

 Manfred township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 56 73 25 30 48 36 .03 35 .85 1 .1 0 .7

 Norway Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . 46 67 88 31 30 44 35 .52 34 .64 1 .3 0 .9

 Oshkosh township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 55 55 29 29 30 34 .81 34 .75 1 .6 0 .8

 Pony Gulch township . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 57 58 24 25 29 35 .12 35 .11 1 .3 0 .7

 Progress township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 36 45 14 18 20 35 .86 34 .86 0 .6 0 .4

 Rusland township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 37 54 21 22 23 35 .23 34 .71 1 .1 0 .6

 St . Anna township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 25 34 14 15 16 34 .94 33 .29 0 .5 0 .4

 Silver Lake township . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 27 33 15 14 14 36 .03 34 .83 0 .6 0 .4

 South Cottonwood township . . . . . . 40 52 78 26 25 28 35 .90 35 .40 1 .1 0 .7

 Speedwell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 68 76 35 35 49 36 .06 35 .74 1 .6 1 .0

 Sykeston city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 153 167 85 95 102 0 .38 0 .38 307 .9 223 .7

 Sykeston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 54 54 23 25 25 35 .43 34 .92 1 .2 0 .7

 Valhalla township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 32 45 19 17 33 35 .98 35 .45 0 .6 0 .5

 Wells township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 127 137 55 48 51 34 .21 33 .63 3 .0 1 .6

 Western township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 86 115 36 34 39 35 .97 35 .56 2 .4 1 .0

 West Norway township . . . . . . . . . . . 35 57 73 22 27 27 36 .00 35 .83 1 .0 0 .6

 West Ontario township . . . . . . . . . . . 32 49 44 19 24 26 35 .74 35 .40 0 .9 0 .5

 Woodward township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 34 45 13 19 22 35 .96 35 .69 0 .6 0 .4

Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22,398 19,761 21,129 10,464 9,680 10,180 2,147 .87 2,077 .40 10 .8 5 .0

 Alamo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 51 69 41 43 46 0 .57 0 .55 103 .6 74 .5

 Athens township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 28 28 13 18 17 36 .00 35 .87 0 .6 0 .4

 Barr Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 27 19 10 12 12 35 .81 35 .68 0 .3 0 .3

 Big Meadow township . . . . . . . . . . . 27 25 31 14 20 23 35 .89 34 .89 0 .8 0 .4

 Big Stone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 32 39 17 16 25 35 .87 35 .71 0 .9 0 .5

 Blacktail township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 63 44 137 163 144 36 .07 35 .83 1 .7 3 .8

 Blue Ridge township . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 32 40 20 22 26 36 .05 33 .93 1 .0 0 .6

 Bonetraill township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 24 24 14 14 14 36 .01 36 .01 0 .5 0 .4

 Brooklyn township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 35 11 15 14 35 .63 35 .62 0 .8 0 .3

 Buford township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 136 193 32 68 94 35 .48 33 .79 2 .2 0 .9

 Bull Butte township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 16 23 15 18 18 51 .43 51 .32 0 .3 0 .3

 Champion township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 19 20 9 10 13 35 .99 35 .87 0 .4 0 .3
38 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 8. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

County/County Equivalent

County Subdivision

Place

Population Housing units Area measurements in 

square miles

Average per square mile 

of land

2010 2000 1990 2010 2000 1990 Total area Land area

Population 

density

Housing unit 

density

 North Dakota—Con .

Williams County—Con .

 Climax township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 20 19 15 13 15 32 .90 32 .87 0 .3 0 .5

 Cow Creek UT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 14 (X) 13 12 (X) 36 .37 36 .35 0 .5 0 .4

 Dry Fork township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 29 36 23 17 22 35 .85 35 .82 1 .2 0 .6

 Dublin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 20 15 7 8 10 36 .02 35 .77 0 .4 0 .2

 East Fork township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 15 24 11 11 13 36 .38 36 .36 0 .5 0 .3

 Ellisville township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 11 29 15 14 21 35 .92 35 .80 0 .4 0 .4

 Epping city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 79 64 40 41 39 0 .38 0 .38 263 .2 105 .3

 Equality township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 47 48 23 22 25 35 .19 35 .14 1 .3 0 .7

 Farmvale township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 36 39 16 22 20 35 .87 35 .83 1 .0 0 .4

 Golden Valley township . . . . . . . . . . 19 23 32 14 13 19 36 .09 35 .96 0 .5 0 .4

 Good Luck township . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 17 32 13 12 18 35 .87 35 .86 0 .7 0 .4

 Grenora city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 202 261 121 139 170 0 .61 0 .61 400 .0 198 .4

 Grenora township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 16 22 6 6 9 32 .39 31 .49 0 .3 0 .2

 Hardscrabble township . . . . . . . . . . . 86 88 88 36 32 33 50 .26 50 .25 1 .7 0 .7

 Hazel township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 31 45 24 25 31 35 .57 35 .16 0 .6 0 .7

 Hebron township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 23 34 18 17 27 50 .42 50 .42 0 .7 0 .4

 Judson township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 144 164 61 55 64 35 .87 35 .85 3 .6 1 .7

 Lindahl township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 38 37 21 24 27 35 .87 35 .64 1 .3 0 .6

 Marshall township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 28 43 18 19 22 36 .32 36 .32 1 .4 0 .5

 Missouri Ridge township . . . . . . . . . 496 429 446 202 171 178 35 .94 35 .89 13 .8 5 .6

 Mont township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 43 45 22 22 24 35 .93 35 .91 1 .3 0 .6

 New Home township . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 16 30 12 15 18 35 .99 35 .98 0 .1 0 .3

 Oliver township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 6 17 9 10 10 36 .01 35 .99 0 .2 0 .3

 Orthell township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 12 19 9 8 14 35 .93 35 .89 0 .3 0 .3

 Pherrin township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 276 291 (X) 104 113 (X) 35 .84 35 .78 7 .7 2 .9

 Pleasant Valley township . . . . . . . . . 121 135 173 69 65 67 36 .34 36 .34 3 .3 1 .9

 Rainbow township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 19 17 14 15 18 35 .90 35 .74 0 .4 0 .4

 Ray city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 534 603 301 296 316 1 .04 1 .01 586 .1 298 .0

 Rock Island township . . . . . . . . . . . . – 4 8 5 5 9 35 .20 34 .39 – 0 .1

 Round Prairie township . . . . . . . . . . 118 125 133 54 51 56 50 .60 50 .58 2 .3 1 .1

 Sauk Valley township . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 80 94 56 55 64 35 .75 35 .57 1 .7 1 .6

 Scorio township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 32 54 29 39 47 35 .78 34 .96 1 .1 0 .8

 Southeast Williams UT . . . . . . . . . . . 78 15 10 138 17 10 78 .60 54 .70 1 .4 2 .5

 South Meadow township . . . . . . . . . 23 35 35 15 20 22 36 .00 35 .71 0 .6 0 .4

 Springbrook city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 29 14 20 14 0 .37 0 .37 73 .0 37 .8

 Springbrook township . . . . . . . . . . . 67 44 67 24 17 30 35 .07 34 .81 1 .9 0 .7

 Stony Creek township . . . . . . . . . . . 558 476 474 217 180 192 63 .29 50 .38 11 .1 4 .3

 Strandahl township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 21 32 14 13 19 32 .70 32 .53 0 .6 0 .4

 Tioga city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,230 1,125 1,278 619 569 602 1 .39 1 .31 938 .9 472 .5

 Tioga township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 84 137 73 40 55 34 .59 34 .44 3 .0 2 .1

 Trenton township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541 524 525 209 194 194 32 .48 30 .53 17 .7 6 .8

 Truax township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 190 122 97 110 109 113 57 .10 49 .30 3 .9 2 .2

 Twelve Mile township . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 80 111 49 40 71 69 .97 62 .23 1 .2 0 .8

 Tyrone township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 44 49 18 23 24 36 .33 36 .33 0 .9 0 .5

 View township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 44 41 19 17 17 35 .84 35 .80 0 .9 0 .5

 West Bank township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 57 68 29 27 29 36 .57 36 .57 1 .4 0 .8

 Wheelock township . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 55 39 20 30 14 36 .04 36 .03 2 .0 0 .6

 Wildrose city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 129 193 91 102 114 0 .29 0 .29 379 .3 313 .8

 Williston city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,716 12,512 13,136 6,542 5,912 6,084 7 .56 7 .50 1,962 .1 872 .3

 Williston township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,307 1,193 1,204 530 445 482 26 .43 21 .76 60 .1 24 .4

 Winner township . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 40 45 19 22 24 36 .04 35 .82 0 .7 0 .5
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 39

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

This page is intentionally blank.
40 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010 2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010

 North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 642,200 638,800 4 .7 317,498 r 289,678 276,340 9 .6

Abercrombie city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 263 296 252 –11 .1 121 138 121 –12 .3

Adams city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 203 248 –37 .4 98 118 146 –16 .9

Alamo city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 51 69 11 .8 41 43 46 –4 .7

Alexander city, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 217 216 2 .8 120 106 115 13 .2

Alice city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 56 62 –28 .6 21 25 30 –16 .0

Almont city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122 89 117 37 .1 66 63 76 4 .8

Alsen city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 68 113 –48 .5 28 45 67 –37 .8

Ambrose city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 23 48 13 .0 29 41 47 –29 .3

Amenia city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 89 82 5 .6 38 35 31 8 .6

Amidon city, Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 24 –23 .1 17 17 22 –

Anamoose city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 227 282 277 –19 .5 140 149 161 –6 .0

Aneta city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 284 314 –21 .8 142 155 164 –8 .4

Antler city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 47 74 –42 .6 29 44 55 –34 .1

Ardoch city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 61 49 9 .8 39 41 29 –4 .9

Argusville city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475 147 161 223 .1 152 65 56 133 .8

Arnegard city, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115 105 122 9 .5 59 60 84 –1 .7

Arthur city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 337 402 400 –16 .2 144 140 133 2 .9

Ashley city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 749 882 1,052 –15 .1 520 528 548 –1 .5

Auburn CDP, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 (X) (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) (X)

Ayr city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 23 19 –26 .1 10 13 14 –23 .1

Balfour city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 20 33 30 .0 18 21 35 –14 .3

Balta city, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 73 79 –11 .0 47 49 56 –4 .1

Bantry city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 19 16 –26 .3 8 11 22 –27 .3

Barney city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52 69 79 –24 .6 28 28 27 –

Barton CDP, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) (X)

Bathgate city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 66 75 –34 .8 25 28 33 –10 .7

Beach city, Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,019 1,116 1,205 –8 .7 601 570 614 5 .4

Belcourt CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,078 2,440 2,458 –14 .8 783 856 864 –8 .5

Belfield city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 800 866 887 –7 .6 418 439 455 –4 .8

Benedict city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 53 52 24 .5 35 27 30 29 .6

Bergen city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 11 15 –36 .4 10 11 9 –9 .1

Berlin city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 35 38 –2 .9 18 20 18 –10 .0

Berthold city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 454 466 409 –2 .6 178 181 171 –1 .7

Beulah city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,121 3,152 3,363 –1 .0 1,508 1,475 1,437 2 .2

Binford city, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183 201 233 –9 .0 125 120 129 4 .2

Bisbee city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 167 227 –24 .6 97 102 121 –4 .9

Bismarck city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,272 r 55,392 49,272 10 .6 28,648 r 24,218 20,047 18 .3

Blanchard CDP, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 (X) (X) (X) 11 (X) (X) (X)

Bottineau city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,211 2,336 2,598 –5 .4 1,085 1,114 1,164 –2 .6

Bowbells city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 406 498 –17 .2 223 214 258 4 .2

Bowdon city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131 139 196 –5 .8 94 104 121 –9 .6

Bowman city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,650 1,600 1,741 3 .1 867 799 837 8 .5

Braddock city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 43 56 –51 .2 24 27 31 –11 .1

Briarwood city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 78 88 –6 .4 28 26 27 7 .7

Brinsmade city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 29 21 20 .7 20 24 17 –16 .7

Brocket city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 65 81 –12 .3 38 35 43 8 .6

Brooktree Park CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 (X) (X) (X) 29 (X) (X) (X)

Buchanan city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 77 40 16 .9 34 29 15 17 .2

Bucyrus city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 22 3 .8 17 16 14 6 .3

Buffalo city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 209 204 –10 .0 101 105 108 –3 .8

Burlington city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,060 1,096 995 –3 .3 410 388 372 5 .7

Butte city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 92 129 –26 .1 84 82 90 2 .4

Buxton city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 323 350 343 –7 .7 144 141 143 2 .1

Caledonia CDP, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 (X) (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) (X)

Calio city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 24 43 –8 .3 13 17 20 –23 .5

Calvin city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 26 27 –23 .1 10 19 22 –47 .4

Cando city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,115 1,342 1,564 –16 .9 701 707 722 –0 .8

Cannon Ball CDP, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 875 864 702 1 .3 227 208 180 9 .1

Canton City city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 42 64 7 .1 32 29 33 10 .3

Carpio city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 148 178 6 .1 83 90 94 –7 .8

Carrington city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,065 2,268 2,267 –9 .0 1,057 1,057 1,047 –

Carson city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 293 319 383 –8 .2 194 201 224 –3 .5

Casselton city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,329 1,855 1,601 25 .6 926 738 664 25 .5

Cathay city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 56 54 –23 .2 29 37 36 –21 .6

Cavalier city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,302 1,537 1,508 –15 .3 723 750 717 –3 .6

Cayuga city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 61 60 –55 .7 26 32 39 –18 .8

Center city, Oliver County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 571 678 826 –15 .8 310 310 351 –

Christine city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 153 140 –2 .0 67 61 59 9 .8

Churchs Ferry city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 77 118 –84 .4 5 46 58 –89 .1

Cleveland city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 112 121 –25 .9 54 59 58 –8 .5
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 41

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Area measurements in square miles Average per square mile of land

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Total area Land area Population density Housing unit density

70,698 .32 69,000 .80 9 .7 4 .6 North Dakota

0 .61 0 .61 431 .1 198 .4 Abercrombie city, Richland County

1 .02 1 .00 127 .0 98 .0 Adams city, Walsh County

0 .57 0 .55 103 .6 74 .5 Alamo city, Williams County

1 .44 1 .43 155 .9 83 .9 Alexander city, McKenzie County

0 .96 0 .96 41 .7 21 .9 Alice city, Cass County

2 .64 2 .64 46 .2 25 .0 Almont city, Morton County

29 .89 29 .36 1 .2 1 .0 Alsen city, Cavalier County

1 .07 1 .07 24 .3 27 .1 Ambrose city, Divide County

1 .43 1 .43 65 .7 26 .6 Amenia city, Cass County

0 .64 0 .64 31 .3 26 .6 Amidon city, Slope County

0 .62 0 .61 372 .1 229 .5 Anamoose city, McHenry County

0 .99 0 .99 224 .2 143 .4 Aneta city, Nelson County

0 .16 0 .16 168 .8 181 .3 Antler city, Bottineau County

0 .26 0 .26 257 .7 150 .0 Ardoch city, Walsh County

4 .01 4 .01 118 .5 37 .9 Argusville city, Cass County

0 .25 0 .25 460 .0 236 .0 Arnegard city, McKenzie County

1 .52 1 .52 221 .7 94 .7 Arthur city, Cass County

0 .63 0 .63 1,188 .9 825 .4 Ashley city, McIntosh County

1 .01 1 .01 47 .5 20 .8 Auburn CDP, Walsh County

0 .08 0 .08 212 .5 125 .0 Ayr city, Cass County

0 .49 0 .49 53 .1 36 .7 Balfour city, McHenry County

0 .25 0 .22 295 .5 213 .6 Balta city, Pierce County

0 .17 0 .17 82 .4 47 .1 Bantry city, McHenry County

0 .16 0 .16 325 .0 175 .0 Barney city, Richland County

0 .44 0 .34 58 .8 50 .0 Barton CDP, Pierce County

0 .27 0 .27 159 .3 92 .6 Bathgate city, Pembina County

1 .93 1 .93 528 .0 311 .4 Beach city, Golden Valley County

6 .01 5 .81 357 .7 134 .8 Belcourt CDP, Rolette County

1 .09 1 .08 740 .7 387 .0 Belfield city, Stark County

0 .25 0 .25 264 .0 140 .0 Benedict city, McLean County

0 .74 0 .74 9 .5 13 .5 Bergen city, McHenry County

0 .10 0 .10 340 .0 180 .0 Berlin city, LaMoure County

0 .37 0 .37 1,227 .0 481 .1 Berthold city, Ward County

2 .52 2 .49 1,253 .4 605 .6 Beulah city, Mercer County

0 .35 0 .35 522 .9 357 .1 Binford city, Griggs County

0 .26 0 .26 484 .6 373 .1 Bisbee city, Towner County

31 .23 30 .84 1,986 .8 928 .9 Bismarck city, Burleigh County

0 .25 0 .25 104 .0 44 .0 Blanchard CDP, Traill County

1 .09 1 .09 2,028 .4 995 .4 Bottineau city, Bottineau County

0 .80 0 .80 420 .0 278 .8 Bowbells city, Burke County

0 .25 0 .25 524 .0 376 .0 Bowdon city, Wells County

1 .53 1 .53 1,078 .4 566 .7 Bowman city, Bowman County

0 .25 0 .25 84 .0 96 .0 Braddock city, Emmons County

0 .15 0 .15 486 .7 186 .7 Briarwood city, Cass County

0 .23 0 .23 152 .2 87 .0 Brinsmade city, Benson County

0 .78 0 .77 74 .0 49 .4 Brocket city, Ramsey County

0 .18 0 .18 444 .4 161 .1 Brooktree Park CDP, Cass County

0 .08 0 .08 1,125 .0 425 .0 Buchanan city, Stutsman County

0 .35 0 .35 77 .1 48 .6 Bucyrus city, Adams County

0 .23 0 .23 817 .4 439 .1 Buffalo city, Cass County

0 .64 0 .64 1,656 .3 640 .6 Burlington city, Ward County

0 .25 0 .25 272 .0 336 .0 Butte city, McLean County

0 .20 0 .20 1,615 .0 720 .0 Buxton city, Traill County

0 .52 0 .52 75 .0 38 .5 Caledonia CDP, Traill County

8 .89 8 .15 2 .7 1 .6 Calio city, Cavalier County

0 .22 0 .22 90 .9 45 .5 Calvin city, Cavalier County

0 .63 0 .63 1,769 .8 1,112 .7 Cando city, Towner County

96 .67 88 .27 9 .9 2 .6 Cannon Ball CDP, Sioux County

0 .14 0 .14 321 .4 228 .6 Canton City city, Pembina County

0 .59 0 .59 266 .1 140 .7 Carpio city, Ward County

2 .11 2 .11 978 .7 500 .9 Carrington city, Foster County

4 .02 4 .02 72 .9 48 .3 Carson city, Grant County

1 .90 1 .87 1,245 .5 495 .2 Casselton city, Cass County

0 .18 0 .18 238 .9 161 .1 Cathay city, Wells County

0 .82 0 .82 1,587 .8 881 .7 Cavalier city, Pembina County

0 .99 0 .99 27 .3 26 .3 Cayuga city, Sargent County

0 .46 0 .46 1,241 .3 673 .9 Center city, Oliver County

0 .19 0 .19 789 .5 352 .6 Christine city, Richland County

0 .43 0 .43 27 .9 11 .6 Churchs Ferry city, Ramsey County

0 .18 0 .18 461 .1 300 .0 Cleveland city, Stutsman County
42 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010 2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010

Clifford city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 51 51 –13 .7 23 26 23 –11 .5

Cogswell city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 165 184 –40 .0 73 81 105 –9 .9

Coleharbor city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 106 88 –25 .5 51 56 58 –8 .9

Colfax city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 91 80 33 .0 48 44 39 9 .1

Columbus city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 151 223 –11 .9 130 142 160 –8 .5

Conway city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 23 24 – 15 11 15 36 .4

Cooperstown city, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 984 1,053 1,247 –6 .6 543 563 595 –3 .6

Courtenay city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 53 70 –15 .1 26 30 40 –13 .3

Crary city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 149 145 –4 .7 51 54 51 –5 .6

Crosby city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,070 1,089 1,312 –1 .7 613 637 687 –3 .8

Crystal city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 167 199 –17 .4 78 92 96 –15 .2

Dahlen CDP, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) (X)

Davenport city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 252 261 218 –3 .4 96 92 78 4 .3

Dawson city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 75 78 –18 .7 54 52 50 3 .8

Dazey city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 91 129 14 .3 56 47 52 19 .1

Deering city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 118 99 –16 .9 44 50 59 –12 .0

De Lamere CDP, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 (X) (X) (X) 14 (X) (X) (X)

Denhoff CDP, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 (X) (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) (X)

Des Lacs city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 209 216 –2 .4 78 76 74 2 .6

Devils Lake city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,141 7,222 7,782 –1 .1 3,481 3,508 3,325 –0 .8

Dickey city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 57 53 –26 .3 31 31 31 –

Dickinson city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,787 16,010 16,097 11 .1 7,865 7,033 6,838 11 .8

Dodge city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 125 135 –30 .4 67 73 74 –8 .2

Donnybrook city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 90 106 –34 .4 37 46 59 –19 .6

Douglas city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 64 93 – 40 44 45 –9 .1

Drake city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 275 322 361 –14 .6 200 201 228 –0 .5

Drayton city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 824 913 961 –9 .7 422 440 447 –4 .1

Driscoll CDP, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 (X) (X) (X) 44 (X) (X) (X)

Dunn Center city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 122 128 19 .7 80 81 80 –1 .2

Dunseith city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 773 739 723 4 .6 299 282 267 6 .0

Dwight city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 75 83 9 .3 34 36 38 –5 .6

East Dunseith CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 500 219 260 128 .3 152 60 68 153 .3

East Fairview CDP, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76 (X) (X) (X) 48 (X) (X) (X)

Edgeley city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 563 637 680 –11 .6 313 336 340 –6 .8

Edinburg city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 196 252 284 –22 .2 125 132 137 –5 .3

Edmore city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182 256 329 –28 .9 125 143 163 –12 .6

Egeland city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 49 103 –42 .9 42 48 51 –12 .5

Elgin city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 642 659 765 –2 .6 416 379 415 9 .8

Ellendale city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,394 1,559 1,798 –10 .6 698 750 765 –6 .9

Elliott city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 44 32 –43 .2 15 18 16 –16 .7

Embden CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 (X) (X) (X) 26 (X) (X) (X)

Emerado city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 414 510 483 –18 .8 233 328 277 –29 .0

Enderlin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 886 947 997 –6 .4 454 481 480 –5 .6

 Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 5 17 –20 .0 3 2 5 50 .0

 Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 882 942 980 –6 .4 451 479 475 –5 .8

Englevale CDP, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 (X) (X) (X) 21 (X) (X) (X)

Epping city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 79 64 26 .6 40 41 39 –2 .4

Erie CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 65 (X) –23 .1 26 35 (X) –25 .7

Esmond city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 159 196 –37 .1 106 114 126 –7 .0

Fairdale city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 51 76 –25 .5 33 38 43 –13 .2

Fairmount city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 367 406 427 –9 .6 195 202 204 –3 .5

Fargo city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 90,599 74,084 16 .5 49,956 41,200 31,704 21 .3

Fessenden city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 479 625 655 –23 .4 289 306 345 –5 .6

Fingal city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 133 138 –27 .1 57 62 69 –8 .1

Finley city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 445 515 543 –13 .6 245 256 289 –4 .3

Flasher city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 285 317 –18 .6 135 155 170 –12 .9

Flaxton city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 73 121 –9 .6 69 77 99 –10 .4

Forbes city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 64 72 –17 .2 41 39 44 5 .1

Fordville city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 266 299 –20 .3 121 131 138 –7 .6

Forest River city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125 154 148 –18 .8 59 68 69 –13 .2

Forman city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 504 506 586 –0 .4 255 256 263 –0 .4

Fort Ransom city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 70 111 10 .0 64 44 65 45 .5

Fort Totten CDP, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,243 952 867 30 .6 295 255 241 15 .7

Fortuna city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 31 53 –29 .0 26 39 46 –33 .3

Fort Yates city, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 228 183 –19 .3 73 78 78 –6 .4

Four Bears Village CDP, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . 517 364 309 42 .0 155 90 87 72 .2

Foxholm CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 (X) (X) (X) 38 (X) (X) (X)

Fredonia city, Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 51 66 –9 .8 37 30 37 23 .3

Frontier city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 214 273 218 –21 .6 76 78 57 –2 .6

Fullerton city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 85 94 –36 .5 39 39 41 –

Gackle city, Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 310 335 450 –7 .5 211 212 221 –0 .5

Galesburg city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108 157 161 –31 .2 64 76 82 –15 .8

Gardena city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 38 41 –23 .7 21 21 28 –
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 43

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Area measurements in square miles Average per square mile of land

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Total area Land area Population density Housing unit density

0 .14 0 .14 314 .3 164 .3 Clifford city, Traill County

0 .33 0 .33 300 .0 221 .2 Cogswell city, Sargent County

0 .18 0 .18 438 .9 283 .3 Coleharbor city, McLean County

1 .02 1 .02 118 .6 47 .1 Colfax city, Richland County

0 .27 0 .27 492 .6 481 .5 Columbus city, Burke County

0 .22 0 .22 104 .5 68 .2 Conway city, Walsh County

0 .97 0 .97 1,014 .4 559 .8 Cooperstown city, Griggs County

0 .44 0 .44 102 .3 59 .1 Courtenay city, Stutsman County

0 .93 0 .89 159 .6 57 .3 Crary city, Ramsey County

1 .37 1 .37 781 .0 447 .4 Crosby city, Divide County

0 .65 0 .65 212 .3 120 .0 Crystal city, Pembina County

0 .14 0 .14 128 .6 121 .4 Dahlen CDP, Nelson County

0 .27 0 .27 933 .3 355 .6 Davenport city, Cass County

0 .34 0 .34 179 .4 158 .8 Dawson city, Kidder County

0 .38 0 .38 273 .7 147 .4 Dazey city, Barnes County

0 .07 0 .07 1,400 .0 628 .6 Deering city, McHenry County

0 .26 0 .26 115 .4 53 .8 De Lamere CDP, Sargent County

0 .66 0 .66 30 .3 31 .8 Denhoff CDP, Sheridan County

0 .56 0 .53 384 .9 147 .2 Des Lacs city, Ward County

6 .51 6 .50 1,098 .6 535 .5 Devils Lake city, Ramsey County

0 .22 0 .22 190 .9 140 .9 Dickey city, LaMoure County

10 .03 9 .96 1,785 .8 789 .7 Dickinson city, Stark County

0 .47 0 .47 185 .1 142 .6 Dodge city, Dunn County

0 .70 0 .70 84 .3 52 .9 Donnybrook city, Ward County

0 .31 0 .29 220 .7 137 .9 Douglas city, Ward County

2 .02 1 .97 139 .6 101 .5 Drake city, McHenry County

0 .65 0 .65 1,267 .7 649 .2 Drayton city, Pembina County

0 .58 0 .58 141 .4 75 .9 Driscoll CDP, Burleigh County

0 .39 0 .39 374 .4 205 .1 Dunn Center city, Dunn County

1 .00 1 .00 773 .0 299 .0 Dunseith city, Rolette County

0 .20 0 .20 410 .0 170 .0 Dwight city, Richland County

5 .21 5 .13 97 .5 29 .6 East Dunseith CDP, Rolette County

0 .38 0 .38 200 .0 126 .3 East Fairview CDP, McKenzie County

0 .75 0 .75 750 .7 417 .3 Edgeley city, LaMoure County

0 .31 0 .31 632 .3 403 .2 Edinburg city, Walsh County

0 .27 0 .27 674 .1 463 .0 Edmore city, Ramsey County

0 .38 0 .38 73 .7 110 .5 Egeland city, Towner County

1 .05 1 .05 611 .4 396 .2 Elgin city, Grant County

1 .52 1 .52 917 .1 459 .2 Ellendale city, Dickey County

0 .15 0 .15 166 .7 100 .0 Elliott city, Ransom County

0 .72 0 .72 81 .9 36 .1 Embden CDP, Cass County

0 .31 0 .31 1,335 .5 751 .6 Emerado city, Grand Forks County

1 .44 1 .44 615 .3 315 .3 Enderlin city

0 .03 0 .03 133 .3 100 .0 Cass County

1 .41 1 .41 625 .5 319 .9 Ransom County

1 .49 1 .49 26 .8 14 .1 Englevale CDP, Ransom County

0 .38 0 .38 263 .2 105 .3 Epping city, Williams County

2 .01 2 .01 24 .9 12 .9 Erie CDP, Cass County

0 .46 0 .46 217 .4 230 .4 Esmond city, Benson County

0 .31 0 .31 122 .6 106 .5 Fairdale city, Walsh County

0 .32 0 .32 1,146 .9 609 .4 Fairmount city, Richland County

48 .82 48 .82 2,162 .0 1,023 .3 Fargo city, Cass County

0 .45 0 .45 1,064 .4 642 .2 Fessenden city, Wells County

0 .42 0 .42 231 .0 135 .7 Fingal city, Barnes County

3 .47 3 .47 128 .2 70 .6 Finley city, Steele County

0 .71 0 .70 331 .4 192 .9 Flasher city, Morton County

0 .28 0 .28 235 .7 246 .4 Flaxton city, Burke County

0 .25 0 .25 212 .0 164 .0 Forbes city, Dickey County

1 .01 1 .01 209 .9 119 .8 Fordville city, Walsh County

0 .50 0 .50 250 .0 118 .0 Forest River city, Walsh County

0 .71 0 .70 720 .0 364 .3 Forman city, Sargent County

0 .30 0 .30 256 .7 213 .3 Fort Ransom city, Ransom County

8 .84 8 .60 144 .5 34 .3 Fort Totten CDP, Benson County

1 .01 1 .00 22 .0 26 .0 Fortuna city, Divide County

0 .06 0 .06 3,066 .7 1,216 .7 Fort Yates city, Sioux County

1 .04 1 .04 497 .1 149 .0 Four Bears Village CDP, McKenzie County

0 .96 0 .96 78 .1 39 .6 Foxholm CDP, Ward County

0 .24 0 .24 191 .7 154 .2 Fredonia city, Logan County

0 .19 0 .19 1,126 .3 400 .0 Frontier city, Cass County

0 .39 0 .39 138 .5 100 .0 Fullerton city, Dickey County

0 .56 0 .54 574 .1 390 .7 Gackle city, Logan County

0 .17 0 .17 635 .3 376 .5 Galesburg city, Traill County

0 .32 0 .32 90 .6 65 .6 Gardena city, Bottineau County
44 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010 2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010

Gardner city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Garrison city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gascoyne city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . .

Gilby city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . .

Gladstone city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Glenburn city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Glenfield city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Glen Ullin city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Golden Valley city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . .

Golva city, Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . .

Goodrich city, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . .

Grace City city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Grafton city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Grand Forks city, Grand Forks County . . . . .

Grand Forks AFB CDP, Grand Forks County

Grandin city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Grano city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Granville city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . .

Great Bend city, Richland County . . . . . . . . .

Green Acres CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . .

Grenora city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gwinner city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hague city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Halliday city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hamberg city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hamilton city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . .

Hampden city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . .

Hankinson city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . .

Hannaford city, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hannah city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hansboro city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Harmon CDP, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Harvey city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Harwood city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hatton city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Havana city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Haynes city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hazelton city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . .

Hazen city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hebron city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Heil CDP, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Heimdal CDP, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hettinger city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hillsboro city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hoople city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hope city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Horace city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hunter city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Hurdsfield city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Inkster city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . .

Jamestown city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . .

Jessie CDP, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Jud city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Karlsruhe city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . .

Kathryn city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Kenmare city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Kensal city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Kief city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Killdeer city, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Kindred city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Knox city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Kramer city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Kulm city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Lakota city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LaMoure city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . .

Landa city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Langdon city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . .

Lankin city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Lansford city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . .

Larimore city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . .

Larson CDP, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

 . . . . . . . . .

74

1,453

16

237

239

380

91

807

182

61

98

63

4,284

52,838

2,367

173

173

–

7

241

60

575

244

753

71

188

21

61

48

919

131

15

12

145

1,783

718

777

71

23

235

2,411

747

15

27

1,226

1,603

242

258

2,430

261

84

50

15,427

25

72

82

52

1,096

163

13

751

692

25

29

354

672

889

38

1,878

98

245

1,346

12

r

80

1,318

23

243

248

374

134

865

183

106

163

71

4,516

49,366

4,832

181

181

–

9

286

118

(X)

202

717

91

227

28

73

60

1,058

181

20

8

(X)

1,989

607

707

94

19

237

2,457

803

(X)

(X)

1,307

1,563

292

303

915

326

91

102

15,527

(X)

76

119

63

1,081

161

13

713

614

59

44

422

781

944

28

2,101

131

253

1,433

17

85

1,530

22

262

224

439

118

927

239

101

192

108

4,884

49,417

9,343

213

213

–

9

236

108

(X)

261

585

109

288

19

74

89

1,038

204

49

20

(X)

2,263

590

800

124

37

240

2,818

888

(X)

(X)

1,574

1,488

310

281

662

341

92

95

15,571

(X)

84

143

72

1,214

191

24

722

569

45

51

514

898

970

38

2,241

152

249

1,464

26

–7 .5

10 .2

–30 .4

–2 .5

–3 .6

1 .6

–32 .1

–6 .7

–0 .5

–42 .5

–39 .9

–11 .3

–5 .1

7 .0

–51 .0

–4 .4

–4 .4

–

–22 .2

–15 .7

–49 .2

(X)

20 .8

5 .0

–22 .0

–17 .2

–25 .0

–16 .4

–20 .0

–13 .1

–27 .6

–25 .0

50 .0

(X)

–10 .4

18 .3

9 .9

–24 .5

21 .1

–0 .8

–1 .9

–7 .0

(X)

(X)

–6 .2

2 .6

–17 .1

–14 .9

165 .6

–19 .9

–7 .7

–51 .0

–0 .6

(X)

–5 .3

–31 .1

–17 .5

1 .4

1 .2

–

5 .3

12 .7

–57 .6

–34 .1

–16 .1

–14 .0

–5 .8

35 .7

–10 .6

–25 .2

–3 .2

–6 .1

–29 .4

35

737

10

110

113

183

57

416

117

52

107

36

1,990

23,449

807

77

77

–

3

135

38

163

121

370

51

135

15

37

35

501

79

14

14

49

997

248

394

47

16

126

1,074

396

11

33

704

763

135

155

826

138

61

50

6,983

14

50

61

37

558

83

12

342

289

26

41

248

403

436

22

1,057

72

128

623

14

r

39

655

15

114

106

181

59

405

124

71

113

39

2,005

20,873

1,516

80

80

–

5

141

42

(X)

139

329

53

155

15

40

53

524

85

24

13

(X)

1,056

201

331

51

15

129

1,131

434

(X)

(X)

720

727

148

155

311

160

65

55

6,970

(X)

51

70

43

553

86

18

351

267

28

43

251

387

433

28

1,178

83

131

620

13

42

733

12

117

96

182

62

437

139

62

122

49

2,051

19,586

2,618

77

77

–

3

142

47

(X)

170

246

59

182

16

43

58

510

92

49

16

(X)

1,060

172

334

61

16

126

1,118

470

(X)

(X)

769

714

145

163

216

168

71

66

6,740

(X)

53

76

46

637

93

21

367

246

25

46

283

429

430

29

1,109

89

130

654

13

–10 .3

12 .5

–33 .3

–3 .5

6 .6

1 .1

–3 .4

2 .7

–5 .6

–26 .8

–5 .3

–7 .7

–0 .7

12 .3

–46 .8

–3 .8

–3 .8

–

–40 .0

–4 .3

–9 .5

(X)

–12 .9

12 .5

–3 .8

–12 .9

–

–7 .5

–34 .0

–4 .4

–7 .1

–41 .7

7 .7

(X)

–5 .6

23 .4

19 .0

–7 .8

6 .7

–2 .3

–5 .0

–8 .8

(X)

(X)

–2 .2

5 .0

–8 .8

–

165 .6

–13 .8

–6 .2

–9 .1

0 .2

(X)

–2 .0

–12 .9

–14 .0

0 .9

–3 .5

–33 .3

–2 .6

8 .2

–7 .1

–4 .7

–1 .2

4 .1

0 .7

–21 .4

–10 .3

–13 .3

–2 .3

0 .5

7 .7
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 45

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Area measurements in square miles Average per square mile of land

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Total area Land area Population density Housing unit density

0 .50 0 .50 148 .0 70 .0 Gardner city, Cass County

1 .38 1 .38 1,052 .9 534 .1 Garrison city, McLean County

1 .00 1 .00 16 .0 10 .0 Gascoyne city, Bowman County

0 .17 0 .17 1,394 .1 647 .1 Gilby city, Grand Forks County

0 .35 0 .34 702 .9 332 .4 Gladstone city, Stark County

0 .25 0 .25 1,520 .0 732 .0 Glenburn city, Renville County

0 .14 0 .14 650 .0 407 .1 Glenfield city, Foster County

1 .07 1 .04 776 .0 400 .0 Glen Ullin city, Morton County

0 .73 0 .73 249 .3 160 .3 Golden Valley city, Mercer County

0 .33 0 .33 184 .8 157 .6 Golva city, Golden Valley County

0 .29 0 .28 350 .0 382 .1 Goodrich city, Sheridan County

0 .40 0 .40 157 .5 90 .0 Grace City city, Foster County

3 .40 3 .40 1,260 .0 585 .3 Grafton city, Walsh County

20 .09 19 .90 2,655 .2 1,178 .3 Grand Forks city, Grand Forks County

8 .13 8 .13 291 .1 99 .3 Grand Forks AFB CDP, Grand Forks County

0 .17 0 .17 1,017 .6 452 .9 Grandin city

0 .15 0 .15 1,153 .3 513 .3 Cass County

0 .02 0 .02 – – Traill County

0 .30 0 .30 23 .3 10 .0 Grano city, Renville County

0 .28 0 .27 892 .6 500 .0 Granville city, McHenry County

0 .55 0 .55 109 .1 69 .1 Great Bend city, Richland County

1 .50 1 .50 383 .3 108 .7 Green Acres CDP, Rolette County

0 .61 0 .61 400 .0 198 .4 Grenora city, Williams County

2 .08 2 .08 362 .0 177 .9 Gwinner city, Sargent County

0 .27 0 .27 263 .0 188 .9 Hague city, Emmons County

0 .46 0 .46 408 .7 293 .5 Halliday city, Dunn County

0 .40 0 .40 52 .5 37 .5 Hamberg city, Wells County

0 .27 0 .27 225 .9 137 .0 Hamilton city, Pembina County

0 .17 0 .17 282 .4 205 .9 Hampden city, Ramsey County

1 .59 1 .59 578 .0 315 .1 Hankinson city, Richland County

0 .22 0 .22 595 .5 359 .1 Hannaford city, Griggs County

0 .19 0 .19 78 .9 73 .7 Hannah city, Cavalier County

0 .19 0 .19 63 .2 73 .7 Hansboro city, Towner County

1 .57 1 .57 92 .4 31 .2 Harmon CDP, Morton County

1 .88 1 .88 948 .4 530 .3 Harvey city, Wells County

1 .27 1 .26 569 .8 196 .8 Harwood city, Cass County

0 .61 0 .61 1,273 .8 645 .9 Hatton city, Traill County

0 .38 0 .37 191 .9 127 .0 Havana city, Sargent County

0 .14 0 .14 164 .3 114 .3 Haynes city, Adams County

0 .36 0 .36 652 .8 350 .0 Hazelton city, Emmons County

1 .27 1 .27 1,898 .4 845 .7 Hazen city, Mercer County

1 .49 1 .49 501 .3 265 .8 Hebron city, Morton County

0 .20 0 .20 75 .0 55 .0 Heil CDP, Grant County

0 .47 0 .47 57 .4 70 .2 Heimdal CDP, Wells County

0 .86 0 .85 1,442 .4 828 .2 Hettinger city, Adams County

1 .09 1 .09 1,470 .6 700 .0 Hillsboro city, Traill County

0 .36 0 .36 672 .2 375 .0 Hoople city, Walsh County

0 .62 0 .62 416 .1 250 .0 Hope city, Steele County

10 .77 10 .77 225 .6 76 .7 Horace city, Cass County

1 .53 1 .51 172 .8 91 .4 Hunter city, Cass County

0 .27 0 .27 311 .1 225 .9 Hurdsfield city, Wells County

1 .00 1 .00 50 .0 50 .0 Inkster city, Grand Forks County

12 .88 12 .83 1,202 .4 544 .3 Jamestown city, Stutsman County

0 .47 0 .47 53 .2 29 .8 Jessie CDP, Griggs County

0 .25 0 .25 288 .0 200 .0 Jud city, LaMoure County

0 .75 0 .75 109 .3 81 .3 Karlsruhe city, McHenry County

0 .59 0 .59 88 .1 62 .7 Kathryn city, Barnes County

1 .24 1 .24 883 .9 450 .0 Kenmare city, Ward County

0 .60 0 .60 271 .7 138 .3 Kensal city, Stutsman County

1 .24 1 .22 10 .7 9 .8 Kief city, McHenry County

0 .94 0 .94 798 .9 363 .8 Killdeer city, Dunn County

1 .45 1 .45 477 .2 199 .3 Kindred city, Cass County

0 .50 0 .50 50 .0 52 .0 Knox city, Benson County

0 .15 0 .15 193 .3 273 .3 Kramer city, Bottineau County

0 .38 0 .38 931 .6 652 .6 Kulm city, LaMoure County

1 .03 1 .03 652 .4 391 .3 Lakota city, Nelson County

1 .32 1 .32 673 .5 330 .3 LaMoure city, LaMoure County

0 .08 0 .08 475 .0 275 .0 Landa city, Bottineau County

1 .68 1 .65 1,138 .2 640 .6 Langdon city, Cavalier County

0 .35 0 .35 280 .0 205 .7 Lankin city, Walsh County

0 .35 0 .35 700 .0 365 .7 Lansford city, Bottineau County

0 .59 0 .59 2,281 .4 1,055 .9 Larimore city, Grand Forks County

0 .41 0 .41 29 .3 34 .1 Larson CDP, Burke County
46 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010 2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010

Lawton city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 42 63 –28 .6 33 38 42 –13 .2

Leal city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 36 35 –44 .4 11 12 16 –8 .3

Leeds city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 427 464 542 –8 .0 266 282 302 –5 .7

Lehr city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 114 191 –29 .8 100 98 123 2 .0

 Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 25 44 –44 .0 20 22 27 –9 .1

 McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 89 147 –25 .8 80 76 96 5 .3

Leith city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 28 43 –42 .9 18 21 28 –14 .3

Leonard city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 255 310 –12 .5 121 124 137 –2 .4

Lidgerwood city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 652 r 781 799 –16 .5 417 404 431 3 .2

Lignite city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 155 174 242 –10 .9 96 111 126 –13 .5

Lincoln city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,406 1,730 1,132 39 .1 836 541 346 54 .5

Linton city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,097 1,321 1,410 –17 .0 642 701 684 –8 .4

Lisbon city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,154 2,292 2,177 –6 .0 1,090 1,017 940 7 .2

Litchville city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 172 191 205 –9 .9 98 110 125 –10 .9

Logan CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 194 (X) (X) (X) 79 (X) (X) (X)

Loma city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 21 27 –23 .8 13 10 13 30 .0

Loraine city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 19 15 –52 .6 7 8 11 –12 .5

Ludden city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 29 41 –20 .7 19 18 26 5 .6

Luverne city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 44 41 –29 .5 21 23 23 –8 .7

McClusky city, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 380 415 492 –8 .4 278 247 267 12 .6

McHenry city, Foster County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 71 85 –21 .1 37 45 57 –17 .8

McLeod CDP, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 (X) (X) (X) 20 (X) (X) (X)

McVille city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 470 559 –25 .7 247 266 281 –7 .1

Maddock city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 382 498 559 –23 .3 253 276 298 –8 .3

Makoti city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 145 145 6 .2 87 89 92 –2 .2

Mandan city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,331 16,718 15,177 9 .6 7,950 6,958 5,910 14 .3

Mandaree CDP, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 596 558 367 6 .8 173 151 131 14 .6

Manning CDP, Dunn County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 (X) (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) (X)

Mantador city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 71 77 –9 .9 36 37 37 –2 .7

Manvel city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 360 370 333 –2 .7 149 144 129 3 .5

Mapleton city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 762 606 682 25 .7 264 193 203 36 .8

Marion city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 146 169 –8 .9 81 86 92 –5 .8

Marmarth city, Slope County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 140 144 –2 .9 93 101 99 –7 .9

Martin city, Sheridan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 96 117 –18 .8 43 48 56 –10 .4

Max city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 334 278 301 20 .1 164 150 155 9 .3

Maxbass city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 91 123 –7 .7 61 70 77 –12 .9

Mayville city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,858 1,953 2,092 –4 .9 872 876 866 –0 .5

Medina city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 308 335 387 –8 .1 182 209 213 –12 .9

Medora city, Billings County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112 100 101 12 .0 102 117 77 –12 .8

Menoken CDP, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 (X) (X) (X) 31 (X) (X) (X)

Mercer city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 94 86 104 9 .3 58 56 57 3 .6

Michigan City city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 294 345 413 –14 .8 173 176 201 –1 .7

Milnor city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 653 711 651 –8 .2 350 338 307 3 .6

Milton city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 85 133 –31 .8 40 60 81 –33 .3

Minnewaukan city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 224 318 401 –29 .6 178 199 203 –10 .6

Minot city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,888 36,567 34,544 11 .8 18,744 16,475 15,040 13 .8

Minot AFB CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,521 7,599 9,095 –27 .3 1,463 2,441 2,575 –40 .1

Minto city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 604 657 560 –8 .1 294 298 255 –1 .3

Mohall city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783 812 931 –3 .6 372 397 427 –6 .3

Monango city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 28 53 28 .6 22 18 32 22 .2

Montpelier city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87 103 82 –15 .5 46 45 40 2 .2

Mooreton city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 204 193 –3 .4 92 95 94 –3 .2

Mott city, Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 721 808 1,019 –10 .8 415 441 506 –5 .9

Mountain city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 133 134 –30 .8 42 55 57 –23 .6

Munich city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 210 268 310 –21 .6 116 124 135 –6 .5

Mylo city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 19 20 5 .3 12 14 13 –14 .3

Napoleon city, Logan County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 792 857 930 –7 .6 401 420 460 –4 .5

Nash CDP, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 (X) (X) (X) 13 (X) (X) (X)

Neche city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371 437 434 –15 .1 168 188 200 –10 .6

Nekoma city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 51 63 –2 .0 36 41 51 –12 .2

Newburg city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 88 104 25 .0 62 64 66 –3 .1

New England city, Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 600 555 663 8 .1 319 320 363 –0 .3

New Leipzig city, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 274 326 –19 .3 155 164 180 –5 .5

New Rockford city, Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,391 1,463 1,604 –4 .9 750 778 760 –3 .6

New Salem city, Morton County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 946 938 909 0 .9 449 448 442 0 .2

New Town city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,925 1,367 1,388 40 .8 701 512 553 36 .9

Niagara city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 57 73 –7 .0 29 35 37 –17 .1

Nome city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62 70 82 –11 .4 35 38 43 –7 .9

Noonan city, Divide County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 154 231 –21 .4 107 116 148 –7 .8

North River city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 65 68 –13 .8 24 19 20 26 .3

Northwood city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 945 959 1,166 –1 .5 443 459 503 –3 .5

Oakes city, Dickey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,856 1,979 1,775 –6 .2 912 908 829 0 .4

Oberon city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 81 103 29 .6 58 46 64 26 .1
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 47

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Area measurements in square miles Average per square mile of land

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Total area Land area Population density Housing unit density

1 .00 0 .92 32 .6 35 .9 Lawton city, Ramsey County

0 .14 0 .14 142 .9 78 .6 Leal city, Barnes County

0 .45 0 .45 948 .9 591 .1 Leeds city, Benson County

0 .19 0 .19 421 .1 526 .3 Lehr city

0 .07 0 .07 200 .0 285 .7 Logan County

0 .11 0 .11 600 .0 727 .3 McIntosh County

1 .25 1 .23 13 .0 14 .6 Leith city, Grant County

0 .75 0 .75 297 .3 161 .3 Leonard city, Cass County

0 .66 0 .66 987 .9 631 .8 Lidgerwood city, Richland County

0 .14 0 .14 1,107 .1 685 .7 Lignite city, Burke County

1 .12 1 .12 2,148 .2 746 .4 Lincoln city, Burleigh County

0 .75 0 .75 1,462 .7 856 .0 Linton city, Emmons County

2 .25 2 .25 957 .3 484 .4 Lisbon city, Ransom County

1 .48 1 .48 116 .2 66 .2 Litchville city, Barnes County

1 .47 1 .46 132 .9 54 .1 Logan CDP, Ward County

26 .83 26 .43 0 .6 0 .5 Loma city, Cavalier County

0 .25 0 .25 36 .0 28 .0 Loraine city, Renville County

0 .77 0 .77 29 .9 24 .7 Ludden city, Dickey County

0 .26 0 .26 119 .2 80 .8 Luverne city, Steele County

0 .39 0 .39 974 .4 712 .8 McClusky city, Sheridan County

0 .25 0 .25 224 .0 148 .0 McHenry city, Foster County

0 .77 0 .77 35 .1 26 .0 McLeod CDP, Ransom County

1 .51 1 .44 242 .4 171 .5 McVille city, Nelson County

0 .89 0 .89 429 .2 284 .3 Maddock city, Benson County

0 .20 0 .20 770 .0 435 .0 Makoti city, Ward County

11 .13 11 .03 1,661 .9 720 .8 Mandan city, Morton County

11 .22 11 .21 53 .2 15 .4 Mandaree CDP, McKenzie County

0 .57 0 .57 129 .8 52 .6 Manning CDP, Dunn County

0 .14 0 .14 457 .1 257 .1 Mantador city, Richland County

0 .29 0 .29 1,241 .4 513 .8 Manvel city, Grand Forks County

4 .00 4 .00 190 .5 66 .0 Mapleton city, Cass County

1 .00 0 .84 158 .3 96 .4 Marion city, LaMoure County

2 .53 2 .50 54 .4 37 .2 Marmarth city, Slope County

0 .09 0 .09 866 .7 477 .8 Martin city, Sheridan County

0 .78 0 .78 428 .2 210 .3 Max city, McLean County

0 .17 0 .17 494 .1 358 .8 Maxbass city, Bottineau County

1 .92 1 .92 967 .7 454 .2 Mayville city, Traill County

1 .02 1 .02 302 .0 178 .4 Medina city, Stutsman County

0 .37 0 .36 311 .1 283 .3 Medora city, Billings County

2 .24 2 .18 32 .1 14 .2 Menoken CDP, Burleigh County

0 .23 0 .22 427 .3 263 .6 Mercer city, McLean County

0 .53 0 .51 576 .5 339 .2 Michigan City city, Nelson County

1 .01 0 .94 694 .7 372 .3 Milnor city, Sargent County

0 .51 0 .51 113 .7 78 .4 Milton city, Cavalier County

0 .27 0 .27 829 .6 659 .3 Minnewaukan city, Benson County

17 .45 17 .43 2,345 .8 1,075 .4 Minot city, Ward County

7 .67 7 .35 751 .2 199 .0 Minot AFB CDP, Ward County

1 .42 1 .42 425 .4 207 .0 Minto city, Walsh County

1 .08 1 .08 725 .0 344 .4 Mohall city, Renville County

0 .37 0 .37 97 .3 59 .5 Monango city, Dickey County

0 .18 0 .18 483 .3 255 .6 Montpelier city, Stutsman County

0 .27 0 .27 729 .6 340 .7 Mooreton city, Richland County

0 .90 0 .90 801 .1 461 .1 Mott city, Hettinger County

0 .14 0 .14 657 .1 300 .0 Mountain city, Pembina County

1 .44 1 .43 146 .9 81 .1 Munich city, Cavalier County

0 .91 0 .91 22 .0 13 .2 Mylo city, Rolette County

1 .40 1 .40 565 .7 286 .4 Napoleon city, Logan County

1 .02 1 .02 31 .4 12 .7 Nash CDP, Walsh County

0 .35 0 .35 1,060 .0 480 .0 Neche city, Pembina County

0 .36 0 .36 138 .9 100 .0 Nekoma city, Cavalier County

0 .13 0 .13 846 .2 476 .9 Newburg city, Bottineau County

0 .49 0 .49 1,224 .5 651 .0 New England city, Hettinger County

0 .89 0 .89 248 .3 174 .2 New Leipzig city, Grant County

1 .54 1 .51 921 .2 496 .7 New Rockford city, Eddy County

1 .47 1 .46 647 .9 307 .5 New Salem city, Morton County

1 .28 1 .28 1,503 .9 547 .7 New Town city, Mountrail County

0 .97 0 .94 56 .4 30 .9 Niagara city, Grand Forks County

0 .41 0 .41 151 .2 85 .4 Nome city, Barnes County

0 .31 0 .30 403 .3 356 .7 Noonan city, Divide County

0 .07 0 .06 933 .3 400 .0 North River city, Cass County

1 .27 1 .27 744 .1 348 .8 Northwood city, Grand Forks County

1 .64 1 .64 1,131 .7 556 .1 Oakes city, Dickey County

0 .34 0 .34 308 .8 170 .6 Oberon city, Benson County
48 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010 2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010

Oriska city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118 128 103 –7 .8 63 57 48 10 .5

Orrin CDP, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 (X) (X) (X) 17 (X) (X) (X)

Osnabrock city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 174 214 –23 .0 73 85 90 –14 .1

Overly city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 19 25 –5 .3 11 10 13 10 .0

Oxbow city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 305 248 100 23 .0 108 84 40 28 .6

Page city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 225 266 3 .1 121 125 144 –3 .2

Palermo city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 77 95 –3 .9 67 53 60 26 .4

Park River city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,403 1,535 1,725 –8 .6 734 760 793 –3 .4

Parshall city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 903 981 943 –8 .0 364 392 403 –7 .1

Pekin city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 80 101 –12 .5 50 63 70 –20 .6

Pembina city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 642 642 –7 .8 279 274 265 1 .8

Perth city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 13 22 –30 .8 6 6 13 –

Petersburg city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 195 219 –1 .5 99 106 116 –6 .6

Pettibone city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 88 93 –20 .5 62 60 66 3 .3

Pick City city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123 166 203 –25 .9 132 117 129 12 .8

Pillsbury city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 24 31 –50 .0 12 11 18 9 .1

Pingree city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60 66 61 –9 .1 29 32 36 –9 .4

Pisek city, Walsh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 96 130 10 .4 60 60 71 –

Plaza city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 171 167 193 2 .4 114 115 126 –0 .9

Porcupine CDP, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 146 (X) (X) (X) 40 (X) (X) (X)

Portal city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126 131 192 –3 .8 80 98 104 –18 .4

Portland city, Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 606 604 602 0 .3 297 286 268 3 .8

Powers Lake city, Burke County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 280 309 408 –9 .4 172 183 221 –6 .0

Prairie Rose city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 68 78 7 .4 26 20 23 30 .0

Raleigh CDP, Grant County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (X) (X) (X) 9 (X) (X) (X)

Ray city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 592 534 603 10 .9 301 296 316 1 .7

Reeder city, Adams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 162 181 252 –10 .5 114 130 136 –12 .3

Regan city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 43 51 – 31 32 29 –3 .1

Regent city, Hettinger County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 211 268 –24 .2 120 126 142 –4 .8

Reile’s Acres city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 513 254 210 102 .0 147 72 56 104 .2

Reynolds city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 350 299 –14 .0 127 135 128 –5 .9

 Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 126 107 –26 .2 44 49 50 –10 .2

 Traill County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 208 224 192 –7 .1 83 86 78 –3 .5

Rhame city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 169 189 186 –10 .6 107 117 105 –8 .5

Richardton city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 529 619 625 –14 .5 285 285 290 –

Riverdale city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205 273 283 –24 .9 188 157 135 19 .7

Robinson city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 71 87 –47 .9 56 56 61 –

Rocklake city, Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101 194 221 –47 .9 103 116 129 –11 .2

Rogers city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 61 69 –24 .6 28 29 33 –3 .4

Rolette city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 594 538 623 10 .4 284 286 298 –0 .7

Rolla city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,280 1,417 1,371 –9 .7 619 656 647 –5 .6

Ross city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 48 61 102 .1 54 29 40 86 .2

Rugby city, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,876 2,939 2,909 –2 .1 1,407 1,434 1,369 –1 .9

Ruso city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 6 8 –33 .3 3 3 5 –

Ruthville CDP, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191 (X) (X) (X) 114 (X) (X) (X)

Rutland city, Sargent County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 220 212 –25 .9 98 102 115 –3 .9

Ryder city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 92 121 –7 .6 62 67 72 –7 .5

St . John city, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 341 358 368 –4 .7 151 154 141 –1 .9

St . Thomas city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 331 447 444 –26 .0 182 201 207 –9 .5

Sanborn city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 192 194 164 –1 .0 80 80 80 –

Sarles city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 25 86 12 .0 27 44 57 –38 .6

 Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 22 83 9 .1 26 42 55 –38 .1

 Towner County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3 3 33 .3 1 2 2 –50 .0

Sawyer city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 357 377 319 –5 .3 150 162 143 –7 .4

Scranton city, Bowman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 281 304 294 –7 .6 147 139 155 5 .8

Selfridge city, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 160 223 242 –28 .3 76 85 108 –10 .6

Selz CDP, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 (X) (X) (X) 30 (X) (X) (X)

Sentinel Butte city, Golden Valley County . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 62 79 –9 .7 38 44 45 –13 .6

Sharon city, Steele County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 109 119 –11 .9 73 76 79 –3 .9

Sheldon city, Ransom County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 116 135 149 –14 .1 61 71 74 –14 .1

Shell Valley CDP, Rolette County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,197 395 343 203 .0 393 103 90 281 .6

Sherwood city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 242 255 286 –5 .1 133 138 144 –3 .6

Sheyenne city, Eddy County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204 318 272 –35 .8 147 187 155 –21 .4

Sibley city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 46 41 –34 .8 50 59 53 –15 .3

Solen city, Sioux County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 86 92 –3 .5 44 43 42 2 .3

Souris city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58 83 97 –30 .1 45 46 57 –2 .2

South Heart city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 301 307 322 –2 .0 129 119 122 8 .4

Spiritwood CDP, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (X) (X) (X) 19 (X) (X) (X)

Spiritwood Lake city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 72 61 25 .0 99 63 96 57 .1

Springbrook city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 26 29 3 .8 14 20 14 –30 .0

Stanley city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,458 1,279 1,371 14 .0 718 664 678 8 .1

Stanton city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366 345 517 6 .1 198 198 230 –

Starkweather city, Ramsey County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 157 197 –25 .5 74 89 88 –16 .9
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 49

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Area measurements in square miles Average per square mile of land

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Total area Land area Population density Housing unit density

0 .28 0 .28 421 .4 225 .0 Oriska city, Barnes County

0 .23 0 .23 95 .7 73 .9 Orrin CDP, Pierce County

0 .30 0 .30 446 .7 243 .3 Osnabrock city, Cavalier County

0 .36 0 .36 50 .0 30 .6 Overly city, Bottineau County

0 .42 0 .42 726 .2 257 .1 Oxbow city, Cass County

0 .18 0 .18 1,288 .9 672 .2 Page city, Cass County

2 .21 2 .20 33 .6 30 .5 Palermo city, Mountrail County

2 .17 2 .17 646 .5 338 .2 Park River city, Walsh County

0 .55 0 .55 1,641 .8 661 .8 Parshall city, Mountrail County

0 .25 0 .25 280 .0 200 .0 Pekin city, Nelson County

0 .77 0 .76 778 .9 367 .1 Pembina city, Pembina County

0 .13 0 .13 69 .2 46 .2 Perth city, Towner County

1 .04 1 .03 186 .4 96 .1 Petersburg city, Nelson County

0 .17 0 .17 411 .8 364 .7 Pettibone city, Kidder County

0 .18 0 .18 683 .3 733 .3 Pick City city, Mercer County

0 .26 0 .26 46 .2 46 .2 Pillsbury city, Barnes County

0 .18 0 .18 333 .3 161 .1 Pingree city, Stutsman County

0 .12 0 .12 883 .3 500 .0 Pisek city, Walsh County

1 .14 1 .12 152 .7 101 .8 Plaza city, Mountrail County

0 .20 0 .20 730 .0 200 .0 Porcupine CDP, Sioux County

0 .56 0 .56 225 .0 142 .9 Portal city, Burke County

0 .86 0 .86 704 .7 345 .3 Portland city, Traill County

1 .23 0 .99 282 .8 173 .7 Powers Lake city, Burke County

0 .04 0 .04 1,825 .0 650 .0 Prairie Rose city, Cass County

0 .29 0 .29 41 .4 31 .0 Raleigh CDP, Grant County

1 .04 1 .01 586 .1 298 .0 Ray city, Williams County

0 .62 0 .62 261 .3 183 .9 Reeder city, Adams County

1 .01 1 .01 42 .6 30 .7 Regan city, Burleigh County

0 .56 0 .56 285 .7 214 .3 Regent city, Hettinger County

0 .48 0 .48 1,068 .8 306 .3 Reile’s Acres city, Cass County

0 .67 0 .67 449 .3 189 .6 Reynolds city

0 .25 0 .25 372 .0 176 .0 Grand Forks County

0 .43 0 .43 483 .7 193 .0 Traill County

1 .50 1 .50 112 .7 71 .3 Rhame city, Bowman County

0 .36 0 .36 1,469 .4 791 .7 Richardton city, Stark County

1 .35 1 .35 151 .9 139 .3 Riverdale city, McLean County

0 .17 0 .17 217 .6 329 .4 Robinson city, Kidder County

0 .22 0 .22 459 .1 468 .2 Rocklake city, Towner County

0 .98 0 .98 46 .9 28 .6 Rogers city, Barnes County

0 .99 0 .99 600 .0 286 .9 Rolette city, Rolette County

1 .43 1 .43 895 .1 432 .9 Rolla city, Rolette County

0 .28 0 .28 346 .4 192 .9 Ross city, Mountrail County

1 .94 1 .94 1,482 .5 725 .3 Rugby city, Pierce County

0 .25 0 .25 16 .0 12 .0 Ruso city, McLean County

0 .15 0 .15 1,273 .3 760 .0 Ruthville CDP, Ward County

0 .38 0 .38 428 .9 257 .9 Rutland city, Sargent County

0 .34 0 .33 257 .6 187 .9 Ryder city, Ward County

0 .45 0 .45 757 .8 335 .6 St . John city, Rolette County

1 .06 1 .06 312 .3 171 .7 St . Thomas city, Pembina County

0 .55 0 .55 349 .1 145 .5 Sanborn city, Barnes County

0 .22 0 .22 127 .3 122 .7 Sarles city

0 .19 0 .19 126 .3 136 .8 Cavalier County

0 .02 0 .02 200 .0 50 .0 Towner County

0 .48 0 .48 743 .8 312 .5 Sawyer city, Ward County

0 .90 0 .90 312 .2 163 .3 Scranton city, Bowman County

0 .27 0 .27 592 .6 281 .5 Selfridge city, Sioux County

0 .14 0 .14 328 .6 214 .3 Selz CDP, Pierce County

1 .06 1 .04 53 .8 36 .5 Sentinel Butte city, Golden Valley County

1 .55 1 .54 62 .3 47 .4 Sharon city, Steele County

0 .22 0 .22 527 .3 277 .3 Sheldon city, Ransom County

15 .04 15 .00 79 .8 26 .2 Shell Valley CDP, Rolette County

0 .31 0 .31 780 .6 429 .0 Sherwood city, Renville County

0 .16 0 .16 1,275 .0 918 .8 Sheyenne city, Eddy County

0 .04 0 .04 750 .0 1,250 .0 Sibley city, Barnes County

0 .30 0 .30 276 .7 146 .7 Solen city, Sioux County

0 .10 0 .10 580 .0 450 .0 Souris city, Bottineau County

0 .95 0 .94 320 .2 137 .2 South Heart city, Stark County

0 .88 0 .88 20 .5 21 .6 Spiritwood CDP, Stutsman County

1 .79 1 .07 84 .1 92 .5 Spiritwood Lake city, Stutsman County

0 .37 0 .37 73 .0 37 .8 Springbrook city, Williams County

1 .83 1 .82 801 .1 394 .5 Stanley city, Mountrail County

0 .48 0 .47 778 .7 421 .3 Stanton city, Mercer County

0 .14 0 .14 835 .7 528 .6 Starkweather city, Ramsey County
50 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Population Housing units

2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010 2010 2000 1990

Percent 

change 

2000 to 

2010

Steele city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 715 761 762 –6 .0 362 367 351 –1 .4

Strasburg city, Emmons County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 409 549 553 –25 .5 224 245 241 –8 .6

Streeter city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 170 172 161 –1 .2 125 125 140 –

Surrey city, Ward County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 934 917 856 1 .9 335 313 302 7 .0

Sutton CDP, Griggs County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 (X) (X) (X) 23 (X) (X) (X)

Sykeston city, Wells County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 153 167 –23 .5 85 95 102 –10 .5

Tappen city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 197 210 239 –6 .2 106 100 114 6 .0

Taylor city, Stark County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 148 150 163 –1 .3 96 83 99 15 .7

Thompson city, Grand Forks County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 986 1,006 930 –2 .0 362 339 294 6 .8

Tioga city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,230 1,125 1,278 9 .3 619 569 602 8 .8

Tolley city, Renville County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 63 79 –25 .4 40 39 47 2 .6

Tolna city, Nelson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 166 202 230 –17 .8 109 118 122 –7 .6

Tower City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 252 233 0 .4 115 113 117 1 .8

 Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . – – – – 1 1 2 –

 Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 253 252 233 0 .4 114 112 115 1 .8

Towner city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 533 574 669 –7 .1 337 335 362 0 .6

Turtle Lake city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 581 580 681 0 .2 340 329 364 3 .3

Tuttle city, Kidder County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 106 160 –24 .5 69 79 86 –12 .7

Underwood city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 778 812 976 –4 .2 377 381 464 –1 .0

Upham city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 155 205 –16 .1 112 120 134 –6 .7

Valley City city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,585 6,826 7,163 –3 .5 3,307 3,250 3,222 1 .8

Velva city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,084 1,049 968 3 .3 493 483 486 2 .1

Venturia city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 23 30 –56 .5 12 14 18 –14 .3

Verona city, LaMoure County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85 108 103 –21 .3 47 53 53 –11 .3

Voltaire city, McHenry County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 51 63 –21 .6 22 21 26 4 .8

Wahpeton city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,766 8,586 8,751 –9 .6 3,482 3,492 3,317 –0 .3

Walcott city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 189 178 24 .3 103 89 83 15 .7

Wales city, Cavalier County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 30 48 3 .3 20 31 43 –35 .5

Walhalla city, Pembina County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 996 1,057 1,131 –5 .8 515 556 552 –7 .4

Warwick city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 65 75 80 –13 .3 32 47 49 –31 .9

Washburn city, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,246 1,389 1,506 –10 .3 661 659 654 0 .3

Watford City city, McKenzie County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,744 1,435 1,784 21 .5 873 790 913 10 .5

West Fargo city, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,830 14,940 12,287 72 .9 10,760 5,968 4,574 80 .3

Westhope city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 578 –19 .5 218 268 246 –18 .7

Wheatland CDP, Cass County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 60 (X) 13 .3 33 28 (X) 17 .9

White Earth city, Mountrail County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 63 73 27 .0 37 27 57 37 .0

White Shield CDP, McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 336 348 274 –3 .4 112 108 96 3 .7

Wildrose city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110 129 193 –14 .7 91 102 114 –10 .8

Williston city, Williams County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,716 12,512 13,136 17 .6 6,542 5,912 6,084 10 .7

Willow City city, Bottineau County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 163 221 281 –26 .2 123 143 172 –14 .0

Wilton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 711 807 728 –11 .9 358 347 323 3 .2

 Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 161 242 176 –33 .5 103 106 81 –2 .8

 McLean County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 550 565 552 –2 .7 255 241 242 5 .8

Wimbledon city, Barnes County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 237 275 –8 .9 119 126 140 –5 .6

Wing city, Burleigh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 152 124 208 22 .6 90 89 97 1 .1

Wishek city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,002 1,122 1,171 –10 .7 516 532 569 –3 .0

Wolford city, Pierce County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 50 56 –28 .0 27 30 33 –10 .0

Woodworth city, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 80 102 –37 .5 52 56 63 –7 .1

Wyndmere city, Richland County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 429 533 501 –19 .5 226 247 232 –8 .5

York city, Benson County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 26 35 –11 .5 23 32 35 –28 .1

Ypsilanti CDP, Stutsman County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 (X) (X) (X) 52 (X) (X) (X)

Zap city, Mercer County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 237 231 287 2 .6 135 129 162 4 .7

Zeeland city, McIntosh County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 141 197 –39 .0 99 103 114 –3 .9
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 51

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 9. 

Population and Housing Units: 1990 to 2010; and Area Measurements and Density: 2010—Con.

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Area measurements in square miles Average per square mile of land

State

Place and [in Selected States] County Subdivision

Total area Land area Population density Housing unit density

0 .57 0 .57 1,254 .4 635 .1 Steele city, Kidder County

0 .30 0 .30 1,363 .3 746 .7 Strasburg city, Emmons County

0 .35 0 .35 485 .7 357 .1 Streeter city, Stutsman County

0 .99 0 .98 953 .1 341 .8 Surrey city, Ward County

0 .20 0 .20 85 .0 115 .0 Sutton CDP, Griggs County

0 .38 0 .38 307 .9 223 .7 Sykeston city, Wells County

1 .05 1 .05 187 .6 101 .0 Tappen city, Kidder County

0 .50 0 .50 296 .0 192 .0 Taylor city, Stark County

0 .46 0 .46 2,143 .5 787 .0 Thompson city, Grand Forks County

1 .39 1 .31 938 .9 472 .5 Tioga city, Williams County

0 .13 0 .13 361 .5 307 .7 Tolley city, Renville County

0 .76 0 .76 218 .4 143 .4 Tolna city, Nelson County

2 .08 2 .08 121 .6 55 .3 Tower City city

0 .62 0 .62 – 1 .6 Barnes County

1 .46 1 .46 173 .3 78 .1 Cass County

0 .81 0 .81 658 .0 416 .0 Towner city, McHenry County

0 .52 0 .51 1,139 .2 666 .7 Turtle Lake city, McLean County

0 .25 0 .25 320 .0 276 .0 Tuttle city, Kidder County

0 .91 0 .91 854 .9 414 .3 Underwood city, McLean County

0 .33 0 .33 393 .9 339 .4 Upham city, McHenry County

3 .46 3 .46 1,903 .2 955 .8 Valley City city, Barnes County

0 .83 0 .83 1,306 .0 594 .0 Velva city, McHenry County

0 .06 0 .06 166 .7 200 .0 Venturia city, McIntosh County

0 .25 0 .25 340 .0 188 .0 Verona city, LaMoure County

0 .40 0 .40 100 .0 55 .0 Voltaire city, McHenry County

5 .29 5 .29 1,468 .1 658 .2 Wahpeton city, Richland County

1 .02 1 .02 230 .4 101 .0 Walcott city, Richland County

0 .24 0 .23 134 .8 87 .0 Wales city, Cavalier County

1 .07 1 .05 948 .6 490 .5 Walhalla city, Pembina County

1 .00 0 .65 100 .0 49 .2 Warwick city, Benson County

1 .89 1 .79 696 .1 369 .3 Washburn city, McLean County

1 .42 1 .40 1,245 .7 623 .6 Watford City city, McKenzie County

14 .71 14 .44 1,788 .8 745 .2 West Fargo city, Cass County

0 .33 0 .33 1,300 .0 660 .6 Westhope city, Bottineau County

4 .01 4 .01 17 .0 8 .2 Wheatland CDP, Cass County

1 .50 1 .50 53 .3 24 .7 White Earth city, Mountrail County

3 .80 3 .80 88 .4 29 .5 White Shield CDP, McLean County

0 .29 0 .29 379 .3 313 .8 Wildrose city, Williams County

7 .56 7 .50 1,962 .1 872 .3 Williston city, Williams County

0 .45 0 .45 362 .2 273 .3 Willow City city, Bottineau County

0 .64 0 .63 1,128 .6 568 .3 Wilton city

0 .26 0 .25 644 .0 412 .0 Burleigh County

0 .38 0 .38 1,447 .4 671 .1 McLean County

0 .53 0 .53 407 .5 224 .5 Wimbledon city, Barnes County

0 .59 0 .59 257 .6 152 .5 Wing city, Burleigh County

1 .45 1 .44 695 .8 358 .3 Wishek city, McIntosh County

0 .16 0 .16 225 .0 168 .8 Wolford city, Pierce County

0 .22 0 .22 227 .3 236 .4 Woodworth city, Stutsman County

0 .88 0 .88 487 .5 256 .8 Wyndmere city, Richland County

0 .23 0 .23 100 .0 100 .0 York city, Benson County

0 .55 0 .55 189 .1 94 .5 Ypsilanti CDP, Stutsman County

1 .05 1 .04 227 .9 129 .8 Zap city, Mercer County

0 .30 0 .30 286 .7 330 .0 Zeeland city, McIntosh County
52 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 10. 

Rank by 2010 Population and Housing Units: 2000 and 2010 

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Place [2,500 or More Population] Population Housing units

2010 rank 2010 2000 2010 rank 2010 2000

Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 105,549 90,599 1 49,956 41,200

Bismarck city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 61,272 r 55,392 2 28,648 r 24,218

Grand Forks city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 52,838 r 49,366 3 23,449 r 20,873

Minot city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 40,888 36,567 4 18,744 16,475

West Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 25,830 14,940 5 10,760 5,968

Mandan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 18,331 16,718 6 7,950 6,958

Dickinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 17,787 16,010 7 7,865 7,033

Jamestown city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 15,427 15,527 8 6,983 6,970

Williston city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 14,716 12,512 9 6,542 5,912

Wahpeton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 7,766 8,586 10 3,482 3,492

Devils Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 7,141 7,222 11 3,481 3,508

Valley City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 6,585 6,826 12 3,307 3,250

Minot AFB CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 5,521 7,599 15 1,463 2,441

Grafton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 4,284 4,516 13 1,990 2,005

Beulah city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 3,121 3,152 14 1,508 1,475

Rugby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2,876 2,939 16 1,407 1,434
Population and Housing Unit Counts North Dakota 53

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 11. 

Rank of Places by Percent Change in Population: 

2000 to 2010 

[For information concerning historical counts and geographic change, see “User Notes .” For 

information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

Population Percent change Place [2,500 or More Population]

2010 2000 Rank Percent

West Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25,830 14,940 1 72 .89

Williston city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,716 12,512 2 17 .62

Fargo city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105,549 90,599 3 16 .50

Minot city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,888 36,567 4 11 .82

Dickinson city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,787 16,010 5 11 .10

Bismarck city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61,272 r 55,392 6 10 .62

Mandan city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,331 16,718 7 9 .65

Grand Forks city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,838 r 49,366 8 7 .03

Jamestown city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,427 15,527 9 –0 .64

Beulah city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,121 3,152 10 –0 .98

Devils Lake city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,141 7,222 11 –1 .12

Rugby city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,876 2,939 12 –2 .14

Valley City city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,585 6,826 13 –3 .53

Grafton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,284 4,516 14 –5 .14

Wahpeton city . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,766 8,586 15 –9 .55

Minot AFB CDP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,521 7,599 16 –27 .35
54 North Dakota Population and Housing Unit Counts

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Table 12. 

Population and Housing Units for Urban Areas: 2010

[For information on confidentiality, nonsampling error, and definitions, see Appendixes]

State

Urbanized Area

Urban Cluster

State total Total for urban areas crossing 

state lines

Population Housing units Population Housing units

 North Dakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 672,591 317,498 (X) (X)

 Urban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402,872 182,040 (X) (X)

In urbanized area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,056 122,440 (X) (X)

In urban cluster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133,816 59,600 (X) (X)

 Rural . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 269,719 135,458 (X) (X)

URBANIZED AREA

Bismarck, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 81,955 37,317 (X) (X)

Fargo, ND--MN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134,149 61,615 176,676 78,728

Grand Forks, ND--MN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52,952 23,508 61,270 27,032

URBAN CLUSTER

Beulah, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,949 1,442 (X) (X)

Devils Lake, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,444 3,586 (X) (X)

Dickinson, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17,586 7,761 (X) (X)

Grafton, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,219 1,956 (X) (X)

Grand Forks AFB, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,697 989 (X) (X)

Jamestown, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,284 6,920 (X) (X)

Lincoln, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,992 1,047 (X) (X)

Minot, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42,650 19,484 (X) (X)

Minot AFB, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,521 1,463 (X) (X)

Rugby, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,824 1,382 (X) (X)

Valley City, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,689 3,342 (X) (X)

Wahpeton, ND--MN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,834 3,509 11,113 5,065

Williston, ND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,127 6,719 (X) (X)
Appendixes 

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Appendixes

Several appendixes traditionally found in printed reports are now available in a separate volume. For the 

following, see CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, in print or on the 

Internet at <www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/cph-2-a.pdf> :

Appendix A. Geographic Terms and Concepts

Appendix B. Definitions of Subject Characteristics

Appendix C. Data Collection and Processing Procedures

Appendix D. Questionnaire

Appendix F. Operational Overview and Accuracy of the Data

Appendix G. Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census of the United States

Appendix H. Acknowledgments

This Appendix section contains:

 Appendix E. Maps

Maps North Dakota E-1

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Appendix E. 

Maps

CANADA

RANSOM

RENVILLE

ROLETTE

SARGENT

SHERIDAN

SLOPE

STARK

STUTSMAN

TOWNER

ADAMS

BARNES

BENSON

BILLINGS

BOTTINEAU

BOWMAN

CASS

EDDY

GRAND FORKS

GRANT

McINTOSH

McKENZIE

MORTON

PEMBINA

RAMSEY

RICHLAND

SIOUX

STEELE TRAILL

WALSH WILLIAMS

BURKE

BURLEIGH

CAVALIER

DICKEY

DIVIDE

DUNN

EMMONS

FOSTER

GOLDEN

VALLEY

GRIGGS

HETTINGER

KIDDER

LaMOURE LOGAN

McHENRY

MERCER

MOUNTRAIL

NELSON

OLIVER

PIERCE

WARD

WELLS

McLEAN

MONTANA

MINNESOTA

SOUTH DAKOTA

100°

100°

97°

97°

98°

98°

99°

99°

101°

101°

102°

102°

103°

103°

104°

104°

49°

49°

48°

48°

47°

47°

46°

46°

45°

45°

Counties

LEGEND

CANADA International

MONTANA State

BURLEIGH County

Note: All boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010.

0 20 40 60 Kilometers0 20 40 60 Miles
E-2 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend, Section Locator, and Location Index

DUNN

CASS

WARD

McLEAN

McKENZIE

GRANT

MORTON

WILLIAMS

STARK

STUTSMAN

McHENRY

WELLS

SLOPE

KIDDER BARNES

WALSH

DIVIDE

SIOUX

EMMONS

BENSON

BURKE

BURLEIGH

MOUNTRAIL RAMSEY

CAVALIER

DICKEY

PIERCE

BOTTINEAU

LOGAN

ADAMS

RICHLAND

MERCER

NELSON

BOWMAN

BILLINGS

PEMBINA

TRAILL

LaMOURE

EDDY

TOWNER

ROLETTE

RANSOM

GRAND

FORKS

OLIVER

HETTINGER

STEELE

SHERIDAN

McINTOSH SARGENT

FOSTER GRIGGS

RENVILLE

GOLDEN

VALLEY

6

4

3

5

2

1

9

7

8

11

10

Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend

Census Designated Place

Large River, Lake, Water Body,

or Shoreline

Zena

Lake Erie

American Indian Reservation

(Federal) CAMPO 1

ZIA Off-Reservation Trust Land

Inset

A fishhook joins contiguous and/or discontiguous

parts of the same geographic entity.

SEE INSET A

LEGEND

ADAMS County

1 Map Section

2

 A ’°’ following a place name indicates that the place is an independent place or independent city. An independent place is not part of any legal county subdivision and thus

serves as the statistical equivalent of a legal county subdivision. An independent city is not part of any county or legal county subdivision and thus serves as both the statistical

equivalent of a county and a legal county subdivision. The name for the county subdivision is always the same as that of the place and never shown separately on the map.

State

Incorporated Place2 ROME

YORK County Subdivision2

ERIE County

International

Section Locator

Note: All legal and statistical area boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. Where international, state, county, independent city, and/or county subdivision boundaries

coincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for the highest level of these geographic entities. The county and independent city boundaries are always shown. Where a county

subdivision boundary symbol coincides with a place boundary, the map does not show the place boundary symbol. Where American Indian Reservation (Federal), American Indian

Reservation (State), State Designated Tribal Statistical Area, and/or Tribal Designated Statistical Area boundaries coincide with a county subdivision boundary, the map does not

show the county subdivision boundary symbol. Any geographic entity name may include ’(pt)’ if some portion of the entity extends beyond the limits of the map area displayed on

the page, or if multiple discontiguous pieces of the entity have been discretely labeled on the page. A geographic entity name may include ’(pts)’ if many discontiguous pieces

exist for that entity that cannot be discretely labeled. The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau statistical data collection and tabulation purposes only; their

depiction and designation for statistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority or rights of ownership or entitlement.

1

 A ’ ’ following an American Indian area name indicates that tribal subdivisions are defined for that area. The tribal subdivision boundaries are displayed on the tribal subdivision

map(s) immediately following the geographic areas reference maps. *
Maps North Dakota E-3

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

COUNTY MAP

SEC

Adams 8

Barnes 6

Benson 3

Billings 4

Bottineau 2

Bowman 8

Burke 1

Burleigh 5

Cass 11

Cavalier 3

Dickey 10

Divide 1

Dunn 4

Eddy 6

Emmons 9

Foster 6

Golden Valley 4

Grand Forks 7

Grant 9

Griggs 6

Hettinger 8

Kidder 6

LaMoure 10

Logan 10

McHenry 2

McIntosh 10

McKenzie 4

McLean 5

Mercer 5

Morton 9

Mountrail 1

Nelson 3

Oliver 5

Pembina 7

Pierce 3

Ramsey 3

Ransom 11

Renville 2

Richland 11

Rolette 3

Sargent 11

Sheridan 5

Sioux 9

Slope 8

Stark 4

Steele 6

Stutsman 6

Towner 3

Traill 7

Walsh 7

Ward 2

Wells 6

Williams 1

 Map section numbers refer to the geographic areas reference maps only.

This list presents the map section numbers for each county in the state.

County Location Index

Geographic Areas Reference Map Legend, Section Locator, and Location Index
E-4 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

BURKE

DIVIDE

MOUNTRAIL

WILLIAMS

CLEARWATER

WILLISTON

COLUMBUS°

CROSBY°

BOWBELLS°

ALAMO°

AMBROSE°

GRENORA°

EPPING°

FLAXTON°

FORTUNA°

LIGNITE°

NEWTOWN°

NOONAN°

SPRINGBROOK° STANLEY°

PALERMO°

PARSHALL°

PLAZA°

PORTAL°

POWERS

LAKE°

RAY°

ROSS°

TIOGA°

WHITE

EARTH°

WILDROSE°

WILLISTON°

Larson

FORT BERTHOLD* (pt)

TURTLE

MOUNTAIN

(pts)

TURTLE

MOUNTAIN

(pt)

TURTLEMOUNTAIN(pts)

TURTLE

MOUNTAIN

(pts)

TURTLE

MOUNTAIN (pts)

TURTLE

MOUNTAIN

(pt)

BATTLEVIEW

BOWBELLS

CARTER

CLAYTON

CLEARY

COLVILLE

DALE

DIMOND

FAY

FOOTHILLS

FORTHUN

GARNESS

HARMONIOUS

KANDIYOHI

KELLER

LAKEVIEW

LEAF

MOUNTAIN

LUCY

MINNESOTA

NORTH

BURKE

NORTH

STAR PORTAL RICHLAND

ROSELAND

SHORT

CREEK SOO

THORSON

VALE

VANVILLE

WARD

ALEXANDRIA

AMBROSE

BLOOMING

PRAIRIE

BLOOMING

VALLEY

BORDER

BURG

CLINTON

COALFIELD

DANEVILLE

DE WITT ELKHORN

FERTILE VALLEY

FILLMORE

FRAZIER

FREDERICK GARNET

GOOSENECK

HAWKEYE

HAYLAND

LINCOLN

VALLEY

LONG

CREEK MENTOR

PALMER

PLUMER

SIOUX

TRAIL SMOKY BUTTE

STONEVIEW

TROY TWIN BUTTE

UPLAND

WESTBY

WRITING

ROCK

ALGER

AUSTIN

BANNER

BICKER

BIG

BEND

BROOKBANK

BURKE

COTTONWOOD

CRANE

CREEK

CROWFOOT

DEBING

EGAN

FERTILE

HOWIE

IDAHO

JAMES

HILL

KICKAPOO

KNIFE

RIVER

LIBERTY

LOSTWOOD LOWLAND

McALMOND

McGAHAN MANITOU

MODEL

MOUNTRAIL

MYRTLE

OAKLAND

OSBORN

OSLOE

PALERMO

PARSHALL PLAZA

POWERS POWERS LAKE

PURCELL

RAT

LAKE

REDMOND

ROSS

SHELL

SIDONIA

SIKES

SORKNESS

SOUTHWEST

MOUNTRAIL

SPRING

COULEE

STAVE

VAN

HOOK

WAYZETTA

WEST

MOUNTRAIL

WHITE

EARTH

ROCK

ISLAND

ROUND

PRAIRIE

SAUK

VALLEY

SCORIO

SOUTHEAST WILLIAMS

SOUTH

MEADOW

SPRINGBROOK

STONY

CREEK

STRANDAHL

TIOGA

TRENTON

TRUAX

TWELVE

MILE

TYRONE

VIEW

WEST

BANK

WHEELOCK

WINNER

ATHENS

BARR

BUTTE BIG

MEADOW

BIG

STONE

BLACKTAIL

BLUE

RIDGE

BONETRAILL

BROOKLYN

BUFORD

BULL

BUTTE

CHAMPION

CLIMAX

COW

CREEK

DRY

FORK

DUBLIN

EAST

FORK

ELLISVILLE

EQUALITY

FARMVALE

GOLDEN

VALLEY

GOOD

LUCK

GRENORA

HARDSCRABBLE

HAZEL

HEBRON

JUDSON

LINDAHL

MARSHALL

MISSOURI

RIDGE MONT

NEW

HOME

OLIVER

ORTHELL

PHERRIN

PLEASANT

VALLEY

RAINBOW

SEE

SECTION 2

SEE

SECTION 4

SEE

SECTION 5

Lake Sakakawea

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 1

0 4 8 12 Kilometers0 4 8 12 Miles

102°

102°

102°30’

102°30’

103°

103°

103°30’

103°30’

104°

104°

49°

49°

48°30’

48°30’

48°

48°
Maps North Dakota E-5

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

BOTTINEAU

McHENRY

RENVILLE

WARD

MINOT°

WATERFORD

BALFOUR°

BANTRY°

BERGEN°

BERTHOLD°

BOTTINEAU°

BURLINGTON°

CARPIO°

ANAMOOSE°

ANTLER°

GRANO°

GRANVILLE°

DEERING°

DES

LACS°

DONNYBROOK°

DOUGLAS°

DRAKE°

GARDENA°

GLENBURN°

LORAINE°

KARLSRUHE°

KENMARE°

KIEF°

KRAMER°

LANDA°

LANSFORD°

MAKOTI°

MAXBASS°

NEWBURG°

MOHALL°

SOURIS°

SURREY°

OVERLY°

RYDER°

SAWYER°

SHERWOOD°

TOLLEY°

TOWNER°

UPHAM°

VELVA°

VOLTAIRE°

WESTHOPE°

WILLOW

CITY°

Foxholm

Logan

MinotAFB

Ruthville

FORT

BERTHOLD* (pt)

TURTLEMOUNTAIN(pt)

AMITY

ANTLER

BENTINCK

BLAINE

BRANDER

CECIL

CHATFIELD

CORDELIA

CUT

BANK

DALEN

EIDSVOLD

ELMS

ELYSIAN

HARAM

HASTINGS

HOFFMAN

HOMEN

KANE

LANSFORD

LEWIS

LORDSBURG

MOUNT

ROSE NEWBORG OAK

CREEK

OAK

VALLEY

OSTBY

PEABODY PICKER- ING

RENVILLE

RICHBURG

ROLAND SCANDIA SCOTIA

SERGIUS SHERMAN

STARBUCK

STONE

CREEK TACOMA

WAYNE

WELLINGTON

WHEATON

WHITBY

WHITTERON

WILLOW

VALE

ANAMOOSE

BALFOUR

BANTRY

BERWICK

BJORNSON

NORWICH

NORTH

PRAIRIE

ODIN

OLIVIA

BROWN

COTTONWOOD

LAKE

DEEP

RIVER

DEERING

LAKE

GEORGE

LAKE

HESTER

LAND

LAYTON

LEBANON

PRATT

RIGA

ROSE

HILL

ROUND

LAKE

SALINE

DENBIGH

EAST

McHENRY

EGG

CREEK

FALSEN

GILMORE

GRANVILLE

LITTLE

DEEP

MEADOW

MOUSE

RIVER

NEWPORT

NORMAL

NORTHEAST

McHENRY

SCHILLER

SPRING

GROVE

STREGE

VELVA

VILLARD

GRILLEY

HENDRICKSON

KARLSRUHE

KOTTKE

VALLEY

BRANDON

CALLAHAN

CLAY

COLQUHOUN EDEN

VALLEY

ENSIGN

FAIRBANKS

GRASSLAND

GROVER HAMERLY

HAMLET

HURLEY

IVANHOE LOCK- WOOD

McKINNEY

MUSKEGO PLAIN PRESCOTT

PROSPERITY

ROCKFORD

ROOSEVELT

STAFFORD

VAN

BUREN

WHITE

ASH

VOLTAIRE

WAGAR

WILLOW

CREEK

RICE

LAKE

ROLLING

GREEN

RUSHVILLE RYDER

ST.

MARYS

SAUK

PRAIRIE

SAWYER

SHEALY

SPENCER

SPRING

LAKE

SUNDRE

SURREY

TATMAN

TOLGEN

TORNING VANG WILLIS

AFTON

ANNA

BADEN

BERTHOLD

BRILLIAN

BURLINGTON

BURT

CAMERON

CARBONDALE

CARPIO

DENMARK

DES

LACS

ELMDALE

EUREKA

EVERGREEN

FOXHOLM

FREEDOM

GASMAN

GREELY

GREENBUSH

HARRISON

HIDDENWOOD

HILTON

IOTA

FLAT

KENMARE

KIRKELIE

LINTON LUND

McKINLEY

MANDAN

MARGARET

MARYLAND

MAYLAND

NEDROSE

NEWMAN

NEW

PRAIRIE

ORLIEN

PASSPORT

REE

SEE

SECTION 1 SEE

SECTION 3

SEE

SECTION 5

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 2

100°

100° 100°30’

100°30’ 101°

101°

101°30’

101°30’

102°

102°

102°30’

102°30’

49°

49°

48°30’

48°30’

48°

48°

0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles
E-6 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

BENSON

CAVALIER

NELSON

PIERCE

RAMSEY

ROLETTE

TOWNER

TURTLE

MOUNTAIN (pt)

DEVILSLAKE°

SOUTH

MINNEWAUKAN

BRINSMADE°

MINNEWAUKAN°

Fort

Totten

LALLIE

NORTH

FORT

TOTTEN

KEY

1 POPLAR GROVE

ROLETTE

1 TURTLE MOUNTAIN

RAMSEY

BALTA°

BISBEE°

CHURCHSFERRY°

CRARY°

BROCKET°

CALIO°

CALVIN°

CANDO°

ALSEN°

ANETA°

DUNSEITH°

EDMORE°

EGELAND°

ESMOND°

LAWTON°

LEEDS°

LOMA°

HAMPDEN°

HANNAH° HANSBORO°

KNOX°

LAKOTA°

LANGDON°

McVILLE°

MADDOCK°

NEKOMA°

MICHIGAN

CITY°

MILTON°

MUNICH°

MYLO°

STARKWEATHER°

OBERON°

OSNABROCK°

PEKIN°

PERTH°

PETERSBURG°

ROCKLAKE°

ROLETTE°

ROLLA°

RUGBY°

ST. JOHN°

SARLES°

TOLNA°

WALES°

WARWICK°

WOLFORD°

YORK°

GreenAcres

Orrin

Selz

Shell

Valley

Barton

Belcourt

Dahlen

East

Dunseith

SPIRIT LAKE* (pt)

1

TURTLE

MOUNTAIN

(pts)

ALBERT

ARNE

AURORA

BEAVER

BROE BUTTE VALLEY

EAST

FORK

ELDON

ESMOND

HESPER

IMPARK

IOWA

IRVINE KNOX

ISABEL

LAKE

IBSEN

LALLIE

LEEDS

LOHNES

McCLELLAN

MINCO

MISSION

NORMANIA

NORTH

VIKING

OBERON

PLEASANT

LAKE

RICH

VALLEY

RIGGIN

ROCK

SOUTH

VIKING

TWIN

LAKE

TWIN

TREE

WARWICK WEST

ANTELOPE

WEST

BAY

WOOD

LAKE

YORK

ALMA

BANNER BILLINGS

BRUCE

BYRON

CYPRESS

DRESDEN

EASBY

EAST

ALMA

ELGIN

FREMONT

GLENILA

GORDON

GREY HARVEY

HAY

HENDERSON

HOPE

HURON

LANGDON

LINDEN

LOAM

MANILLA

MINTO

MONTROSE

MOSCOW

MOUNT

CARMEL

NEKOMA

NORTH

LOMA

NORTH

OLGA

OSFORD OSNA- BROCK

PERRY

SEIVERT

SOUTH

DRESDEN

SOUTH

OLGA

STORLIE

TRIER

WATERLOO

WEST

HOPE

LEE

LEVAL MELVIN

MICHIGAN

NASH

NESHEIM

ORA

OSAGO

PETERSBURG

RUBIN

RUGH

SARNIA

WAMDUSKA

WILLIAMS

ALEXANTER ANTELOPE LAKE

BALTA

CENTRAL

PIERCE

ELLING

ELVERUM

HAGEL

JEFFERSON

MEYER NESS

NORTH PIERCE

RENO

VALLEY

RUSH

LAKE

SOUTH

PIERCE

TORGERSON

TRUMAN

TUSCARORA

WHITE

BARTLETT

CATO CHAIN

LAKES

COULEE

CREEL

DE

GROAT

DRY

LAKE

FANCHER

FRESHWATER

GRAND

HARBOR

HAMMER

HARDING

HIGHLAND

CENTER

HOPE

KLINGSTRUP

LAWTON

LILLEHOFF

MORRIS

MINNEWAUKAN

ADLER

BERGEN

CENTRAL

NEWBRE

NEWLAND

NOONAN

NORTH

CREEL

NORTHFIELD

ODESSA

ONTARIO

EAST ROLETTE KOHLMEIER

MARYVILLE

NORTH ROLETTE

SHELL

VALLEY

CLARA DAHLEN

DAYTON

DODDS

ENTERPRISE

FIELD

OVERLAND

PELICAN

1

PROSPECT ROYAL

STEVENS

SOUTH ROLETTE

SOUTH

VALLEY

TURTLE MOUNTAIN

FORDE

HAMLIN

ILLINOIS

LAKOTA

SULLIVAN

TRIUMPH WEBSTER

ARMOURDALE

ATKINS

BETHEL CANDO

COOLIN

CROCUS

DASH

GERRARD

GRAINFIELD

HOWELL

LANSING

MAZA

MOUNT

MONROE

VIEW

NEW

CITY

OLSON

PAULSON

PICTON

ROCK

LAKE

SIDNEY

SMITH

SORENSON

SPRINGFIELD

TEDDY

TWIN

HILL

VICTOR

VIRGINIA

ZION

SEE

SECTION 2

SEE

SECTION 5 SEE

SECTION 6

SEE

SECTION 7

Devils

Lake

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 3

98°

98°

98°30’

98°30’

99°

99°

99°30’

99°30’

100°

100°

49°

49°

48°30’

48°30’

48°

48°

0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles
Maps North Dakota E-7

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

BILLINGS

DUNN

GOLDEN

VALLEY

McKENZIE

STARK

YELLOWSTONE

BEACH°

BELFIELD°

ALEXANDER° ARNEGARD°

GOLVA°

HALLIDAY°

DICKINSON°

DODGE°

DUNN

CENTER°

GLADSTONE°

KILLDEER°

MEDORA°

SOUTH

HEART° RICHARDTON°

SENTINEL

BUTTE°

TAYLOR°

WATFORD CITY°

East

Fairview

Four

Bears

Village

Mandaree

Manning

FORT BERTHOLD* (pt)

NORTH BILLINGS

SOUTH BILLINGS EAST

GOLDEN

VALLEY

ELK

CREEK

ELMWOOD

GARNER

HENRY

LONE

TREE

NORTH

GOLDEN

VALLEY

PEARL

SADDLE

BUTTE

SENTINEL

SOUTH

GOLDEN

VALLEY

FORT BERTHOLD

HALLIDAY

KILLDEER

SOUTH DUNN

BEACH

BULLION

DELHI

DICKINSON NORTH

DICKINSON SOUTH

WEST STARK EAST STARK

ALEX

ANTELOPE

CREEK

ARNEGARD

BLUE

BUTTE

CENTRAL McKENZIE

CHARBON EAST

McKEN- ZIE

ELM

TREE

FORT BERTHOLD

GRAIL

KEENE HAWKEYE

NORTH McKENZIE

RANDOLPH

RIVERVIEW

SIOUX

SOUTHEAST McKENZIE

SOUTHWEST McKENZIE

TRI

TWIN

VALLEY

SEE

SECTION 1

SEE

SECTION 5

SEE

SECTION 8

SEE

SECTION 9

Lake Sakakawea

102°30’

102°30’

103°

103°

103°30’

103°30’

104°

104°

102°

48°

48°

47°30’

47°30’

47°

47°

46°30’

46°30’

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 4

0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles
E-8 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

BURLEIGH

McLEAN

MERCER

OLIVER

SHERIDAN

COLEHARBOR°

HORSESHOE

VALLEY

LINCOLNFORT RICE

BISMARCK°

BENEDICT°

BEULAH°

CENTER°

BUTTE°

GOLDEN

VALLEY°

GOODRICH°

GARRISON°

LINCOLN°

HAZEN°

McCLUSKY°

MARTIN°

MAX°

MERCER°

STANTON°

PICK CITY°

REGAN°

RIVERDALE°

RUSO°

TURTLE

LAKE°

UNDERWOOD°

WASHBURN°

WILTON°

WING°

ZAP°

Menoken

White

Shield

Denhoff

Driscoll

FORT

BERTHOLD*

(pt)

TURTLEMOUNTAIN(pts)

APPLE

CREEK

BOYD

BURNT CREEKRIVERVIEW

CANFIELD

CHRISTIANIA CLEAR LAKE

CROFTE CROM- WELL

DRISCOLL

ECKLUND

ESTHERVILLE

FLORENCE

LAKE

FRANCIS

GHYLIN

GIBBS

GLENVIEW

GRASS

LAKE

HARRIETLIEN

HAY CREEK

HAZEL

GROVE

LOGAN

LONG

LAKE

LYMAN

McKENZIE

MENOKEN

MISSOURI

MORTON

NAUGHTON

PAINTED

WOODS

PHOENIX RICHMOND

ROCK

HILL

SCHRUNK

SIBLEY

BUTTE

STEIBER

STERLING

TAFT

TELFER

THELMA

TRYGG

WILD

ROSE

WILSON

WING

AMUNDSVILLE

ANDREWS

AURENA

BLACKWATER

BLUE

HILL BUTTE

BYERSVILLE

CREMERVILLE

DEEPWATER

DOGDEN

DOUGLAS

EAST McLEAN

FORT

BERTHOLD

GATE

GREATSTONE

LAKE

WILLIAMS

LONGFELLOW

EAST OLIVER

WEST OLIVER

BERLIN

LOQUEMONT

McGINNIS

MALCOLM MEDICINE HILL

MERCER

NORTH

CENTRAL

McLEAN

OTIS

ROSEGLEN

BOONE

DENHOFF

EDGEMONT

FAIRVIEW

ROSEMONT

ST.

MARY

SNOW

SOUTH McLEAN

TURTLE

LAKE

VICTORIA

UNDERWOOD

WEST McLEAN

WISE

EAST MERCER

FORT BERTHOLD

WEST MERCER

GOODRICH

HIGHLAND

LINCOLN

DALE

McCLUSKY

MARTIN

MAUCH

NORTH

SHERIDAN

PICKARD

PROPHETS

ROSENFIELD

SOUTH SHERIDAN

STRASSBURG

SEE

SECTION 1 SEE SECTION 2 SEE SECTION 3

SEE

SECTION 4

SEE

SECTION 6

SEE

SECTION 9

Lake

Sakakawea

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 5

100°

100° 100°30’

100°30’ 101°

101°

101°30’

101°30’

102°

102°

102°30’

102°30’

47°30’

47°30’

47°

47°

0 4 8 12 Kilometers0 4 8 12 Miles
Maps North Dakota E-9

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

BARNES

EDDY

FOSTER

GRIGGS

KIDDER

STEELE

STUTSMAN

WELLS

SOUTH

COTTONWOOD

LAKE

WASHINGTON NEW ROCK- FORD°

CARRINGTON

CARRINGTON°

GLENFIELD° CLEARFIELD

COOPERSTOWN

COOPERSTOWN°

HANNAFORD°

WIMBLEDON°

PILLSBURY°

VALLEY

CITY°

TOWER

CITY°

(pt)

BINGHAMPTON

LITCHVILLE°

THORDENSKJOLD

NORTHWEST

STUTSMAN COURTCOURT- ENAY° ENAY

WOODWORTH° SPIRITWOOD

LAKE°

JAMESTOWN°

MONTPELIER°

MONTPELIER

PETTIBONE°

BINFORD°

CLEVELAND°

DAWSON°

DAZEY°

BOWDON°

BUCHANAN°

CATHAY°

GRACE

CITY°

FESSENDEN°

FINGAL°

FINLEY°

LEAL°

HAMBERG° HARVEY°

HOPE°

HURDSFIELD°

KATHRYN°

KENSAL°

LUVERNE°

McHENRY°

MEDINA°

NOME°

SHEYENNE°

SIBLEY°

STEELE°

STREETER°

SYKESTON°

ORISKA°

PINGREE°

ROBINSON°

ROGERS°

SANBORN°

SHARON°

TAPPEN°

TUTTLE°

Heimdal

Jessie

Spiritwood

Sutton

Ypsilanti

SPIRIT LAKE* (pt)

ALTA

ANDERSON

ASHTABULA

BALDWIN

BRIMER

CUBA

DAZEY

ECKELSON

EDNA

ELLSBURY

GETCHELL

GRAND

PRAIRIE

GREEN

GREENLAND

HEMEN

HOBART

LAKE

TOWN

MANSFIELD MARSH

MEADOW

LAKE

MINNIE

LAKE

NELSON

NOLTIMIER

NORMA

OAKHILL

ORISKA

PIERCE

POTTER

RARITAN

ROGERS

ROSEBUD

SIBLEY

TRAIL

SKANDIA

SPRING

CREEK

SPRINGVALE

STEWART

SVEA

UXBRIDGE

VALLEY

WEIMER

ALLEN

ATWOOD

BAKER

BUCKEYE

BUNKER

CHESTINA

CLEAR

LAKE

CROWN

HILL

CRYSTAL

SPRINGS

EXCELSIOR

FRETTIM

GRAF

HAYNES

KICKAPOO

LAKE

WILLIAMS

MANNING

MERKEL

NORTHWEST

PEACE

PETERSVILLE

PETTIBONE

PLEASANT

HILL

QUINBY

REXINE

ROBINSON

SIBLEY

BUSH

CHERRY

LAKE COLUMBIA

COLVIN

EDDY

SOUTH

KIDDER

STEWART

TANNER

TAPPEN

FREEBORN

GATES

GRANDFIELD

HILLSDALE

TUTTLE

VALLEY

VERNON

WALLACE

WEISER

MUNSTER

NEW

ROCKFORD

PARADISE PLEASANT

PRAIRIE

ADDIE

BALL HILL

BARTLEY BROAD- VIEW

BRYAN

WESTFORD WILLIAMS

WOODLAWN

ROSEFIELD

SHELDON

SUPERIOR

TIFFANY

DOVER GREENFIELD

BIRTSELL

BORDULAC

BUCEPHALIA

HELENA

KINGSLEY

LENORA

MABEL

PILOT

MOUND

EASTMAN

ESTABROOK FLORANCE

GLENFIELD HAVEN

LARRABEE

LONGVIEW

ROMNESS

ROSENDAL

SVERDRUP

TYROL

WASHBURN

McHENRY

McKINNON MELVILLE

NORDMORE

WILLOW

ROLLING

PRAIRIE

ROSE HILL

WYARD

BEAVER

CREEK

BROADLAWN CARPEN- TER COLGATE

EASTON

ENGER

EDENDALE

CUSATOR

DEER

LAKE

DURHAM

EDMUNDS

ELDRIDGE

FLINT

FRIED

GERBER

GERMANIA

GLACIER

GRAY

GRIFFIN

HIDDEN

HOMER

BERLIN

BILODEAU

BREMEN

BULL

MOOSE

CATHAY

IOSCO

JIM

RIVER

VALLEY

KENSAL

LIPPERT

LENTON

CHASELEY

CRYSTAL

LAKE DELGER

FAIRVILLE

FORWARD

LOWERY

LYON

MANNS

MARSTONMOOR

MIDWAY

FRAM

GERMANTOWN

HAALAND

HAMBURG

MOON

LAKE

NEWBURY

NOGOSEK

PARIS

PETERSON

PINGREE

HAWKSNEST

HEIMDAL HILLSDALE

JOHNSON LYNN

MANFRED

PIPESTEM

VALLEY

PLAINVIEW

ROSE

ROUND

TOP

NORWAY

LAKE

OSHKOSH

PONY

GULCH

PROGRESS

RUSLAND

ST. PAUL

SEVERN SHARLOW

SINCLAIR

SPIRITWOOD

STIRTON

STREETER

ST. ANNA

SILVER

LAKE

SPEEDWELL SYKESTON

VALHALLA

WELLS

STRONG

SYDNEY

VALLEY

SPRING

WADSWORTH

WALTERS

WESTERN

WEST

NORWAY

WEST

ONTARIO

WOODWARD

WELD WINDSOR

WINFIELD WOOD- BURY

YPSILANTI

FINLEY

FRANKLIN

GOLDEN

LAKE

GREENVIEW

HUGO MELROSE

NEWBURGH

PRIMROSE

RIVERSIDE

SHARON

SHERBROOKE

WESTFIELD

WILLOW

LAKE

ALEXANDER

ASHLAND

BLOOM

BLOOMENFIELD

BUCHANAN

CHASE

LAKE

CHICAGO

CONKLIN CORINNE

CORWIN

SEE

SECTION 3

SEE

SECTION

5

SEE

SECTION 7

SEE

SECTION 9

SEE

SECTION 10

SEE

SECTION 11

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 6

100°

100°

97°30’

97°30’

98°

98°

98°30’

98°30’

99°

99°

99°30’

99°30’

47°30’

47°30’

47°

47° 46°30’

0 4 8 12 Kilometers0 4 8 12 Miles
E-10 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

GRAND FORKS

PEMBINA

TRAILL

WALSH

THINGVALLA

MOUNTAIN°

FARMING- TON

PARK

RIVER°

PISEK°

FOREST

RIVER°

Grand

Forks

AFB

FALCONER

LARIMORE°

EMERADO°

GRAND

FORKS°

GRAND

FORKS

NORTHWOOD° BENTRU

BELMONT

BINGHAM

CALEDONIA

HILLSBORO°

BATHGATE°

CLIFFORD°

CONWAY°

CRYSTAL°

BUXTON°

CANTON CITY°

CAVALIER°

ADAMS°

ARDOCH°

GRAFTON°

GRANDIN° (pt)

DRAYTON°

EDINBURG°

FAIRDALE°

FORDVILLE°

GALESBURG°

GILBY°

HAMILTON°

HATTON°

HOOPLE°

INKSTER°

LANKIN°

MANVEL°

MAYVILLE°

NECHE°

NIAGARA°

MINTO°

PEMBINA°

PORTLAND°

REYNOLDS°

ST. THOMAS°

THOMPSON°

WALHALLA°

Nash

Auburn

Blanchard

Caledonia

AGNES

ALLENDALE

AMERICUS

ARVILLA

AVON

BLOOMING

BRENNA

CHESTER

ELKMOUNT

ELM

GROVE

FAIRFIELD

GILBY FERRY

GRACE

HEGTON

INKSTER

JOHNSTOWN

LAKEVILLE

LARIMORE

LEVANT

LIND

LOGAN

CENTER

LORETTA

MEKINOCK

MICHIGAN

MORAINE

NIAGARA

NORTHWOOD

OAKVILLE

PLEASANT VIEW

PLYMOUTH

RYE

STRABANE

TURTLE

RIVER

UNION

WALLE

WASHING- TON

WHEATFIELD

ADVANCE

AKRA

BATHGATE

BEAULIEU

CARLISLE

CAVALIER

CRYSTAL

DRAYTON

ELORA

FELSON

GARDAR

HAMILTON JOLIETTE

LA MOURE

LINCOLN LODEMA

MIDLAND

NECHE

PARK

PEMBINA ST. JOSEPH

ST. THOMAS

WALHALLA

BUXTON

ELDORADO

ELM

RIVER

ERVIN

GALESBURG

GARFIELD

GREENFIELD

HERBERG HILLSBORO

KELSO

LINDAAS

MAYVILLE

MORGAN

NORMAN

NORWAY ROSEVILLE

STAVANGER

VIKING WOLD

ACTON

ADAMS

ARDOCH

CLEVELAND

DEWEY

DUNDEE

EDEN

FERTILE

FOREST

RIVER

GLENWOOD

GOLDEN

GRAFTON

HARRIS- TON

KENSING- TON

KINLOSS

LAMPTON

LATONA

MARTIN

MEDFORD

NORTON

OAKWOOD

OPS PERTH

PRAIRIE

CENTRE

PULASKI

RUSHFORD

ST. ANDREWS

SAUTER

SHEPHERD

SILVESTA TIBER

VERNON

VESTA

WALSH

CENTRE

WALSHVILLE

BLANCHARD BLOOMFIELD

BOHNSACK

SEE

SECTION 3

SEE

SECTION 6

SEE

SECTION 11

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 7 96°30’

97°

97°

97°30’

97°30’

98°

98°

98°30’

98°30’

49° 48°30’

48°30’

48°

48°

47°30’

47°30’

0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles
Maps North Dakota E-11

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

ADAMS BOWMAN

HETTINGER SLOPE

MARMARTH°

GASCOYNE°

BOWMAN°

BUCYRUS°

AMIDON°

HAYNES°

HETTINGER°

NEW

ENGLAND°

MOTT°

REEDER°

REGENT°

RHAME°

SCRANTON°

LIGHTNING

CREEK

MAINE

ORANGE

REEDER

SCOTT

SOUTH

FORK

TAYLOR

BUTTE

WEST

ADAMS

WOLF

BUTTE BEISIGL

BUCYRUS

CEDAR

CENTRAL

ADAMS

CHANDLER

CLERMONT

DARLING

SPRINGS

DUCK

CREEK

EAST ADAMS

GILSTRAP HETTINGER

HOLDEN

ADELAIDE

AMOR

BOWMAN

BOYESEN

BUENA

VISTA

FISCHBEIN

GASCOYNE GEM

GOLDFIELD

GRAINBELT

GRAND

RIVER HALEY

HART

LADD LANGBERG

MARION

MINNEHAHA

RHAME

NEBO

SCRANTON

STAR STILLWATER

SUNNY

SLOPE

TALBOT

WEST BOWMAN WHITING

CASTLE

ROCK

CENTRAL

HETTINGER

CHILTON

CLARK

FARINA

HAVELOCK

HIGHLAND

KENNEDY

KERN

KUNZE MADISON

MERRILL

MOTT

NEW

ENGLAND

ODESSA

RIFLE

ST.

CROIX

SOLON

STEINER

STREHLOW TEPEE BUTTE

WAGENDORF

WALKER ACME

ASHBY BAER

BEERY

BLACK

BUTTE

BRITTIAN

CAMPBELL

CANNON

BALL

MOUND

NORTHEAST

SLOPE

NORTHWEST SLOPE PEACEFUL

VALLEY

RAINY

BUTTE

RICHLAND

CENTER

SAND CREEK

SHEETS

WEST SLOPE

BUCKLIN

CARROLL

CASH CEDAR

CREEK

CENTRAL SLOPE

CONNOR

CRAWFORD

WHITE

LAKE

WOODBERRY DEEP CREEK

HARPER

HUGHES

HUME

MINERAL

SPRINGS

MOORD

SEE

SECTION 4

SEE

SECTION 9

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 8

102°

102°

102°30’

102°30’

103°

103°

103°30’

103°30’

104°

104°

47°

46°30’

46°30’

46°

46°

0 4 8 12 Kilometers0 4 8 12 Miles
E-12 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

EMMONS GRANT

MORTON

SIOUX

LakeOahe

BRADDOCK°

CARSON°

ALMONT°

GLEN ULLIN°

HAGUE°

ELGIN°

FLASHER°

FORT

YATES°

LEITH°

LINTON°

HAZELTON°

HEBRON°

MANDAN°

NEW

LEIPZIG°

NEW SALEM°

SOLEN°

STRASBURG°

SELFRIDGE°

Harmon

Heil

Porcupine

Raleigh

Cannon

Ball

STANDING ROCK* (pt)

EAST GRANT

ELM

FISHER

FREDA

HOWE

LARK

LEIPZIG

MINNIE

PRETTY

ROCK

RALEIGH

ROCK

WEST GRANT

WINONA

CAMPBELL

NORTH EMMONS

SOUTH EMMONS

SOUTHWEST SIOUX

CAPTAIN’SLANDING

EAST MORTON

MANDAN WEST MORTON

FORT

YATES

MENZ

NORTH SIOUX

SEE

SECTION 4

SEE

SECTION 5

SEE

SECTION 6

SEE

SECTION 8

SEE

SECTION 10

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 9

100°

100° 100°30’

100°30’ 101°

101°

101°30’

101°30’

102°

102°

47°

47°

46°30’

46°30’

46°

46°

0 4 8 12 Kilometers0 4 8 12 Miles
Maps North Dakota E-13

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

DICKEY

LaMOURE

LOGAN

McINTOSH

ELLENDALE°

FULLERTON°

ASHLEY°

DICKEY°

BERLIN°

EDGELEY°

FORBES°

GACKLE°

FREDONIA°

LEHR°

JUD°

KULM°

LaMOURE°

LUDDEN°

MARION°

NAPOLEON°

MONANGO°

OAKES°

VENTURIA°

VERONA°

WISHEK°

ZEELAND°

SARATOGA

SHERIDAN

SWEDE

WANO

WILLOWBANK

EAST

LOGAN

MAPLE

NORTHWEST

PORT

EMMA

PORTER POTSDAM

FINN GLENDALE

GUTSCHMIDT

HAAG

RIVERDALE SPRING

VALLEY

VALLEY

VAN

METER

WHITESTONE

JANKE RED

LAKE

SEALY

WEST LOGAN

WRIGHT

YORKTOWN

YOUNG

ADRIAN

BADGER

BLACK

LOAM BLUEBIRD

DEAN

GLADSTONE

GLEN

GLENMORE

GOLDEN

GLEN

GRANDGRAND

RAPIDS

VIEW

GREENVILLE HENRI- ETTA

KENNISON LITCH- VILLE MIKKEL- SON

NORA

ADA ALBERTHA

ALBION

BEAR

CREEK CLEMENT

DIVIDE

ELDEN

NORDEN

OVID

PEARL

LAKE

POMONA

VIEW

PRAIRIE

RANEY

ELLENDALE

ELM

GERMAN

GRAND

VALLEY

RAY

ROSCOE RUSSELL

RYAN

HAMBURG

HUDSON

JAMES

RIVER

VALLEY

KENT

KENTNER

KEYSTONE

LORRAINE

LOVELL

EAST

McINTOSH

NORTHWEST McINTOSH

ROLOFF

SOUTHWEST McINTOSH

SEE

SECTION 6

SEE

SECTION 9

SEE

SECTION 11

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 10

98°

98°

98°30’

98°30’

99°

99°

99°30’

99°30’

100°

100°

47° 46°30’

46°30’

46°

46°

0 4 8 12 Kilometers0 4 8 12 Miles
E-14 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

CASS

RANSOM

RICHLAND

SARGENT

ARGUSVILLE°

HARWOOD

Wheatland CASSELTON° MAPLE- TON°

DAVENPORT°

KINDRED°

WHITESTONE

HILL

ROCHESTER

AYR°

BARNEY°

CHRISTINE°

COGSWELL°

COLFAX°

BRIARWOOD°

BUFFALO°

CAYUGA°

ABERCROMBIE°

ALICE°

AMENIA°

ARTHUR°

GRANDIN° (pt)

GREAT

BEND°

GWINNER°

DWIGHT°

ELLIOTT°

ENDERLIN°

FAIRMOUNT°

FARGO°

FORMAN°

FORT RANSOM°

FRONTIER°

GARDNER°

LEONARD°

LIDGERWOOD°

LISBON°

HANKIN- SON°

HARWOOD°

HAVANA°

HORACE°

HUNTER°

MANTADOR°

NORTH RIVER°

MILNOR°

MOORETON°

OXBOW°

PAGE°

PRAIRIE ROSE°

REILE’S

ACRES°

RUTLAND°

SHELDON°

TOWER

CITY° (pt)

WAHPETON°

WALCOTT°

WEST FARGO°

WYNDMERE°

Embden

Englevale

Erie

McLeod

Brooktree Park

De Lamere

LAKE TRAVERSE* (pt) LAKE TRAVERSE (pt)

ADDISON

AMENIA

ARTHUR

AYR

BARNES

BELL

BERLIN

BUFFALO

CASSEL- TON

CLIFTON

CORNELL

DAVENPORT

DOWS

DURBIN

ELDRED

EMPIRE

ERIE

EVEREST

FARGO

GARDNER

GILL

GUNKEL

HARMONY

HIGHLAND

HILL HOWES

HUNTER

KINYON

LAKE

LEONARD

MAPLE

RIVER

MAPLETON

NOBLE

NORMANNA

PAGE

PLEASANT

PONTIAC

RAYMOND REED

RICH

RUSH

RIVER

STANLEY

TOWER

WALBURG WARREN

WATSON

WHEATLAND

WISER

FORMAN

HALL

HARLEM HERMAN

JACKSON

BIG

BEND

CASEY

COBURN

ELLIOTT

KINGSTON

MARBOE

MILNOR

RANSOM

FORT

RANSOM

GREENE

HANSON

ISLAND

PARK

ISLEY

LIBERTY

RUTLAND

SARGENT

SHUMAN

SOUTHWEST TAYLOR TEWAUKON

MOORE NORTHLAND

OWEGO

PRESTON

ROSEMEADE

SANDOUN

SCOVILLE

VERNER

VIVIAN

WEBER

WILLEY

SHENFORD

SPRINGER

SYDNA

TULLER

ABERCROMBIE

ANTELOPE

BARNEY

BARRIE

BELFORD BRANDEN- BURG

BRIGHTWOOD

CENTER

COLFAX

DANTON

DEVILLO

DEXTER

DUERR

DWIGHT

EAGLE

ELMA FAIRMOUNT

FREEMAN GARBORG

GRANT

GREENDALE

HELENDALE

HOMESTEAD IBSEN

LaMARS

LIBERTY

GROVE

MOORE- TON

MORAN

NANSEN

SHEYENNE

SUMMIT

VIKING

WALCOTT

WALDO

WEST

END

WYNDMERE

BOWEN

BRAMPTON

DENVER

DUNBAR

ALLEGHANY BALE ALICETON

SEE

SECTION 6

SEE

SECTION 7

SEE

SECTION 10

American Indian Areas, Counties, County Subdivisions, and Places - Section 11

96°30’

96°30’

97°

97°

97°30’

97°30’

98°

98°

47°

47°

46°30’

46°30’

46°

46°

0 4 8 12 Kilometers

0 4 8 12 Miles
Maps North Dakota E-15

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Mandaree

Parshall

White Shield

Shell Creek

Twin Buttes

Four Bears

American Indian Reservation, Tribal Subdivisions - Fort Berthold 0 2 4 6 Kilometers 0 2 4 6 Miles Area Locator Map Map Legend Note: All legal boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. Where the boundaries coincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for the American Indian reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. Any geographic entity name may include ’(pt)’ if some portion of the entity extends beyond the limits of the map area displayed on the page, or if multiple discontiguous pieces of the entity have been discretely labeled on the page. A geographic entity name may include ’(pts)’ if many discontiguous pieces exists for that entity that cannot be discretely labeled. The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau statistical data collection and tabulation purposes only; their depiction and designation for statistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority or rights of ownership or entitlement. American Indian Reservation Tribal Subdivision
E-16 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Heipa

(pt)

American Indian Reservation and Off-Reservation Trust Land, Tribal Subdivisions -

Lake Traverse (pt)

0 2 4 6 Kilometers0246 Miles

Area Locator Map

Map Legend

American Indian Reservation/Off-Reservation Trust LandTribal Subdivision

Note: All legal boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. Wherethe boundaries coincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for theAmerican Indian reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. Anygeographic entity name may include ’(pt)’ if some portion of the entityextends beyond the limits of the map area displayed on the page, or ifmultiple discontiguous pieces of the entity have been discretely labeledon the page. A geographic entity name may include ’(pts)’ if many discontiguous pieces exists for that entity that cannot be discretely labeled.The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau statistical datacollection and tabulation purposes only; their depiction and designation forstatistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional

authority or rights of ownership or entitlement.
Maps North Dakota E-17

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

Crow Hill

(pt)

Fort Totten

(pt)

St. Michael

(pt)

Wood Lake

Crow Hill

(pt)

St. Michael

(pt)

Fort Totten

(pt)

American Indian Reservation, Tribal Subdivisions - Spirit Lake

0 1 2 3 Kilometers

0 1 2 3 Miles

Area Locator Map

Map Legend

American Indian Reservation

Tribal Subdivision

Note: All legal boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. Wherethe boundaries coincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for theAmerican Indian reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. Anygeographic entity name may include ’(pt)’ if some portion of the entityextends beyond the limits of the map area displayed on the page, or ifmultiple discontiguous pieces of the entity have been discretely labeledon the page. A geographic entity name may include ’(pts)’ if many discontiguous pieces exists for that entity that cannot be discretely labeled.The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau statistical datacollection and tabulation purposes only; their depiction and designation forstatistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional

authority or rights of ownership or entitlement.
E-18 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census Porcupine

Cannonball

Fort Yates

Kenel

(pt)

American Indian Reservation, Tribal Subdivisions - Standing Rock (pt) 0 3 6 9 Kilometers 0 3 6 9 Miles Area Locator Map Map Legend American Indian Reservation Tribal Subdivision Note: All legal boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010. Where the boundaries coincide, the map shows the boundary symbol for the American Indian reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. Any geographic entity name may include ’(pt)’ if some portion of the entity extends beyond the limits of the map area displayed on the page, or if multiple discontiguous pieces of the entity have been discretely labeled on the page. A geographic entity name may include ’(pts)’ if many discontiguous pieces exists for that entity that cannot be discretely labeled. The boundaries shown on this map are for Census Bureau statistical data collection and tabulation purposes only; their depiction and designation for statistical purposes does not constitute a determination of jurisdictional authority or rights of ownership or entitlement.
Maps North Dakota E-19

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census CANADA

POLK

(PART)

CLAY

WILKIN

Bismarck

Dickinson Fargo

Grand Forks

Jamestown

Minot

Wahpeton

Williston

RANSOM

RENVILLE

ROLETTE

SARGENT

SHERIDAN

SLOPE

STARK

STUTSMAN

TOWNER

ADAMS

BARNES

BENSON

BILLINGS

BOTTINEAU

BOWMAN

CASS

EDDY

GRAND FORKS

GRANT

McINTOSH

McKENZIE

MORTON

PEMBINA

RAMSEY

RICHLAND

SIOUX

STEELE TRAILL

WALSH WILLIAMS

BURKE

BURLEIGH

CAVALIER

DICKEY

DIVIDE

DUNN

EMMONS

FOSTER

GOLDEN

VALLEY

GRIGGS

HETTINGER

KIDDER

LaMOURE LOGAN

McHENRY

MERCER

MOUNTRAIL

NELSON

OLIVER

PIERCE

WARD

WELLS

McLEAN

MONTANA

MINNESOTA

SOUTH DAKOTA

Dickinson

Jamestown

Minot

Wahpeton

Williston

BISMARCK

FARGO

GRAND

FORKS

(PART)

FargoWahpeton

Core Based Statistical Areas, Counties, and Principal Cities

100°

100°

96°

96°

97°

97°

98°

98°

99°

99°

101°

101°

102°

102°

103°

103°

104°

104°

49°

49°

48°

48°

47°

47°

46°

46°

45°

45°

0 20 40 60 Kilometers0 20 40 60 Miles

LEGEND

Fargo-Wahpeton Combined Statistical Area

Minot Micropolitan Statistical Area

BISMARCK Metropolitan Statistical Area

CBSA boundaries and names are as of December 2009. Allother boundaries and names are as of January 1, 2010.

MONTANA State

GRAND FORKS County

CANADA International

Bismarck

County outside North Dakota

Principal City

State capital underlined
E-20 North Dakota Maps

U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

Beulah

Devils Lake

Dickinson

Grand Forks

AFB

Lincoln

Minot

Valley City

Wahpeton, ND--MN

Rugby

Williston

Grafton

Jamestown

Minot AFB

BISMARCK

FARGO, ND--MN

GRAND FORKS, ND--MN

MINNESOTA

MONTANA

SOUTH DAKOTA

CANADA

100°

100°

97°

97°

98°

98°

99°

99°

101°

101°

102°

102°

103°

103°

104°

104°

49° 49°48° 48°47° 47°46° 46°45° 45°

Urban Areas

URBANIZED AREA

LEGEND

All legal and statistical area boundaries are asof January 1, 2010. Urban Areas are based on results from the 2010 Decennial Census.

INTERNATIONAL

STATE

#

County Boundary

Urban Cluster

±

0 9 18 27 Kilometers

0 9 18 27 Miles