alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

                             As Adopted Pursuant To

                  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Samuel F. Occhipinti, Chief Financial Officer of Solomon Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

      o     the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
            March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
            on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934; and

      o     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company for the periods presented therein.


                                          /s/ Samuel F. Occhipinti
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Samuel F. Occhipinti
                                          Chief Financial Officer
                                          (principal accounting officer)
                                          May 16, 2005
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 August 2006

(2006/C 189/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
combustionsurvey - Fw: Reconsideration information on Dioxin 

 

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/16/2011 03:36PM -----

To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Hunt, Tim" <Tim_Hunt@afandpa.org> 

Date: 07/15/2011 05:03PM 

Cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, "John 

Pinkerton" <jpinkerton@NCASI.org>, "Ashok Jain" <ajain@src-ncasi.org>, 

<Amy_Marshall@URSCorp.com> 

Subject: Reconsideration information on Dioxin 

(See attached file: Why EPA Should Not Establish Numerical DF limits 071511.pdf)

Brian,

In the May 18 Federal Register notice staying the Boiler MACT and CISWI rules, you asked 

for additional information by July 15. The attached paper summarizes what we feel are 

compelling reasons for why work practices are justified for dioxin in Boiler MACT -- 

essentially that the data is below the reliability of the test method making its use 

inappropriate for setting limits given the errors. 

Under CISWI, we realize you must set a limit and can’t rely on work practices so suggest the 

limits not be set below the quantitation limit of 0.3 ng/dscm.

We discussed several of these issues during our June meeting but thought it would be 

helpful to prepare this overview which draws from previously provided information. 

We have also included a colorful bar chart showing how much lower (100 times or more) the 

Boiler and CISWI limits are than any other MACT. It illustrates how problematic the limits are.

From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/16/2011 3:37 PM

Subject: Fw: Reconsideration information on Dioxin

Attachments: Why EPA Should Not Establish Numerical DF limits 071511.pdf

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21B021DO... 8/2/2011
This paper was prepared with contributions from CIBO, ACC, API, NCASI and BPA.

Once you have had a chance to review this information, we would be glad to meet with you. It 

may make sense to have a longer meeting where we can also talk with you about the 

materials NCASI submitted today on carbon monoxide limits (both short term and longer 

term) as well as their papers on test methods and floor setting issues. It may need to be a 

half day or more session given the number and complexity of issues.

Thanks in advance for your consideration of this information and feel free to contact me with 

questions.

Timothy Hunt

Senior Director, Air Quality Programs

AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION

1111 19th Street, NW, Suite 800, Washington, D.C. 20036

Tim_Hunt@afandpa.org

202-463-2588 (phone)

202-463-2423 (fax)

www.afandpa.org

 

 

= 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21B021DO... 8/2/2011
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. (the  "Partnership")
for the  period  ended  March 26, 2004 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, John J.  Fosina,
Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ JOHN J. FOSINA
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John J. Fosina *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 6, 2004
__________________

*  John J. Fosina functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANGELO QUINTIN DOWNEY, 2:04-cv-1725-GEB-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

K. PROSPER,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.-PC. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On April 10, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to plaintiff that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

Case 2:04-cv-01725-GEB-CMK Document 22 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 10, 2006, are adopted in

full;

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted; 

3. This action is dismissed, without prejudice; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.

Dated: May 23, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01725-GEB-CMK Document 22 Filed 05/23/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of PrimeEnergy Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ending December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Drimal Jr., Chief Executive Officer of PrimeEnergy Corporation, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Charles E. Drimal, Jr.
|Chief Executive Officer   
|April 3, 2009
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHANCELLOR WADE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1711 GEB DAD P

vs.

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER FOR PAYMENT

 / OF INMATE FILING FEE

To: The Sheriff of Sacramento County, Attention: Inmate Trust Account, 651 I Street,

Sacramento, California 95814:

Plaintiff, a county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, is

obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $150.00 for this action. Plaintiff has been assessed an

initial partial filing fee of $7.39 for this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Upon

payment of that initial partial filing fee, plaintiff will be obligated to make monthly payments in

the amount of twenty percent of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s trust

account. The Sheriff of Sacramento County is required to send to the Clerk of the Court the

initial partial filing fee and thereafter payments from plaintiff’s inmate trust account each time

the amount in the account exceeds $10.00, until the statutory filing fee of $150.00 is paid in full. 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

Case 2:04-cv-01711-GEB-DAD Document 5 Filed 05/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Sheriff of Sacramento County or a designee shall collect from plaintiff’s

inmate trust account an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $7.39 and shall forward the

amount to the Clerk of the Court. Said payment shall be clearly identified by the name and

number assigned to this action.

2. Thereafter, the Sheriff of Sacramento County or a designee shall collect from

plaintiff’s inmate trust account the $142.61 balance of the filing fee by collecting monthly

payments from plaintiff’s inmate trust account in an amount equal to twenty percent (20%) of the

preceding month’s income credited to the inmate’s trust account and forwarding payments to the

Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 in accordance with 28

U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The payments shall be clearly identified by the name and number assigned

to this action. 

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of

plaintiff’s signed in forma pauperis affidavit on Sheriff of Sacramento County, Attention: Inmate

Trust Account, 651 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814.

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial

Department of the court.

DATED: May 4, 2005.

DAD:4

wade1711.cdc

Case 2:04-cv-01711-GEB-DAD Document 5 Filed 05/05/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4392 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4392

To establish the Southern Border Wall Construction Fund and to transfer 
    unobligated amounts from the Coronavirus State and local fiscal 
recovery funds to such Fund to construct and maintain physical barriers 
                       along the southern border.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2024

Mr. Barrasso (for himself, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Cotton, Ms. 
     Lummis, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Risch, and Ms. Ernst) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To establish the Southern Border Wall Construction Fund and to transfer 
    unobligated amounts from the Coronavirus State and local fiscal 
recovery funds to such Fund to construct and maintain physical barriers 
                       along the southern border.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Build the Wall Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. SOUTHERN BORDER WALL CONSTRUCTION FUND.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established in the general fund of the 
Treasury a separate account, which shall be known as the ``Southern 
Border Wall Construction Fund'' (referred to in this section as the 
``Fund'').
    (b) Deposits.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, there 
shall be immediately deposited into the Fund all of the unobligated 
amounts in the Coronavirus State and local fiscal recovery funds 
established under sections 602 and 603 of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 802 and 803).
    (c) Use of Funds.--Amounts in the Fund shall be used by the 
Secretary of Homeland Security to construct and maintain physical 
barriers along the southern international border of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
10.2


 







REVOLVING
NOTE


 


		$42,000,000.00	October 19, 2016



 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
the undersigned (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., or registered assigns (the
“Lender”), in accordance with the provisions of the Agreement (as hereinafter defined), the principal amount
of each Loan from time to time made by the Lender to the Borrower under that certain Credit Agreement, dated as of October 19,
2016 (as amended, restated, extended, supplemented or otherwise modified in writing from time to time, the “Agreement;”
the terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined), among the Borrower, the Lenders from time to time party thereto,
and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and L/C Issuer.


 


The Borrower promises
to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of each Loan from the date of such Loan until such principal amount is paid in full,
at such interest rates and at such times as provided in the Agreement. All payments of principal and interest shall be made to
the Administrative Agent for the account of the Lender in Dollars in immediately available funds at the Administrative Agent’s
Office. If any amount is not paid in full when due hereunder, such unpaid amount shall bear interest, to be paid upon demand, from
the due date thereof until the date of actual payment (and before as well as after judgment) computed at the per annum rate set
forth in the Agreement.


 


This Note is one of
the Notes referred to in the Agreement, is entitled to the benefits thereof and may be prepaid in whole or in part subject to the
terms and conditions provided therein. This Note is also entitled to the benefits of the Guaranty. Upon the occurrence and continuation
of one or more of the Events of Default specified in the Agreement, all amounts then remaining unpaid on this Note shall become,
or may be declared to be, immediately due and payable all as provided in the Agreement. Loans made by the Lender shall be evidenced
by one or more loan accounts or records maintained by the Lender in the ordinary course of business. The Lender may also attach
schedules to this Note and endorse thereon the date, amount and maturity of its Loans and payments with respect thereto.


 


The Borrower, for itself,
its successors and assigns, hereby waives diligence, presentment, protest and demand and notice of protest, demand, dishonor and
non-payment of this Note.


 


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left
Blank; Signature Page Follows]


 




     


     


    

 


THIS NOTE SHALL BE
GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.


 




	 	Gas Natural Inc.
	 	 
	 	By	/s/ Gregory J. Osborne
	 	Name:  Gregory J. Osborne
	 	Its: President & Chief Executive Officer




 




     


     


    

 


LoanS AND
PAYMENTS with respect thereto





	Date	 	Type of

Loan Made	 	Amount of

Loan Made	 	End of

Interest

Period	 	Amount of

Principal or

Interest

Paid This

Date	 	Outstanding

Principal

Balance

This Date	 	Notation

Made By
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

Stipulation to Dismiss Dynaco, Inc. 

Civil Action No. CIV-S-04-1751 FCD GGH

Page 1 

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO – #084965 (CA) 

JONATHAN T. PECK -- #12303 (VA) 

EVANGELINA FIERRO HERNANDEZ -- #168879 (CA) 

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

 COMMISSION 

San Francisco District Office 

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 625-5622 

Facsimile: (415) 625-5657 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY 

COMMISSION,

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LAMBKA & RENFROE L.L.C., d/b/a/ 

PERKO’S CAFÉ and DYNACO, INC., 

Defendants. 

_______________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. CIV-S-04-1751 FCD GGH

STIPULATION FOR ORDER 

DISMISSING DYNACO, INC. 

 

 

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii), plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity 

Commission and defendant Dynaco, Inc. stipulate that this action and all the claims, issues, and 

allegations that plaintiff asserted or could have asserted in it are and shall be DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE. 

Each party shall pay its own attorneys’fees and costs. 

Case 2:04-cv-01751-FCD-GGH Document 17 Filed 08/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28

Stipulation to Dismiss Dynaco, Inc. 

Civil Action No. CIV-S-04-1751 FCD GGH

Page 2 

Respectfully submitted, 

DATED: ______, 2005 By________________________________ 

WILLIAM TAMAYO 

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

 OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 

 San Francisco District Office 

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 

San Francisco, California 94105 

DATED: ______, 2005 By________________________________ 

JONATHAN PECK 

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

 OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 

 San Francisco District Office 

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 

San Francisco, California 94105 

DATED: ______, 2005 By________________________________ 

EVANGELINA FIERRO HERNANDEZ 

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT 

 OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 

 San Francisco District Office 

350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Telephone: (415) 625-5622 

Facsimile: (415) 625-5657 

DATED: _____, 2005 By______________________________ 

THOMAS NAST 

DYNACO, INC. 

2246 E. Date Avenue 

Fresno, CA 93706 

 Telephone: (559) 485-8520 

 Fascimile: (559) 485-3704

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED: 

DATED: August 1, 2005 

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. ____ 

U.S. District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-01751-FCD-GGH Document 17 Filed 08/01/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 86 (Tuesday, May 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25675-25676]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-10467]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS15-02]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:
    Location: Federal Reserve Board--International Square location, 
1850 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    Date: May 13, 2015.
    Time: 10:30 a.m.
    Status: Open.

Reports

Chairman
Executive Director
ASC Advisory Committee Recommendations
Delegated State Compliance Reviews
Financial Report

Action and Discussion Items

January 14, 2015 Open Session Minutes
AMC Registry Fees
Bulletin 2015-01--State Registration and Supervision of AMCs 2014 ASC 
Annual Report

How To Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting

    If you plan to attend the meeting in person, we ask that you notify 
the

[[Page 25676]]

Federal Reserve Board via email at appraisal-questions@frb.gov, 
requesting a return meeting registration email. The Federal Reserve Law 
Enforcement Unit will then send an email message with a web link where 
you may provide your date of birth and social security number through 
their encrypted system. You may register until close of business May 8, 
2015. You will also be asked to provide identifying information, 
including a valid government-issued photo ID, before being admitted to 
the meeting. Alternatively, you can contact Kevin Wilson at 202-452-
2362 for other registration options. The meeting space is intended to 
accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will not 
accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that 
reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, 
photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device 
designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC meetings.

    Dated: April 29, 2015.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2015-10467 Filed 5-4-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
```