alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4478 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit access by certain 

individuals to certain areas of airports, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to prohibit access 

by certain individuals to certain areas of airports, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Airports From 

5 Enemies Act’’ or the ‘‘SAFE Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4478 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ACCESS BY CERTAIN INDIVID2 UALS TO CERTAIN AREAS OF AIRPORTS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter I of chapter 449 of 

4 title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

5 end the following: 

6 ‘‘§ 44930. Prohibition on certain access by certain in7 dividuals 

8 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘se9 cured area’, ‘Security Identification Display Area’, and 

10 ‘sterile area’ have the meanings given such terms in sec11 tion 1540.5 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations. 

12 ‘‘(b) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other pro13 vision of law, the Administrator of the Transportation Se14 curity Administration may not permit any access to the 

15 locations specified in subsection (c) to any individual who 

16 is a representative of, or acting on behalf of, a country 

17 specified in subsection (d). 

18 ‘‘(c) LOCATIONS SPECIFIED.—The locations specified 

19 in this subsection are the following: 

20 ‘‘(1) The secured area of an airport. 

21 ‘‘(2) The Security Identification Display Area 

22 of an airport. 

23 ‘‘(3) The sterile area of an airport. 

24 ‘‘(4) The air cargo area of an airport. 

25 ‘‘(d) COUNTRIES SPECIFIED.—A country specified in 

26 this subsection is a country the government of which the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4478 IS

1 Secretary of State determines, or has determined at any 

2 time during the immediately preceding 3 years, has re3 peatedly provided support for international terrorism pur4 suant to— 

5 ‘‘(1) section 1754(c)(1)(A) of the Export Con6 trol Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4813(c)(1)(A)); 

7 ‘‘(2) section 620A of the Foreign Assistance 

8 Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371); 

9 ‘‘(3) section 40 of the Arms Export Control Act 

10 (22 U.S.C. 2780); or 

11 ‘‘(4) any other provision of law.’’. 

12 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of contents 

13 for subchapter I of chapter 449 of title 49, United States 

14 Code, is amended by adding at the following: 

‘‘44930. Prohibition on certain access by certain individuals.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen K. Gartside, Jr.,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Evolving Systems, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Date: May 5,  2006                |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| /s/ STEPHEN K.  GARTSIDE, JR.     |   |
| Stephen K.  Gartside, Jr.         |
| President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS MARTEL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0014 DFL PAN P

vs.

R.L. ANDREASEN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 13, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion for appointment of counsel. The

United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to

represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296,

298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance

of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.

1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the

court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s motion for the

appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

On July 19, 2006, defendants filed a request for an extension of time to complete

discovery on the claims against defendant Baughman, and for an extension of time to file

Case 2:04-cv-00014-ALA Document 58 Filed 07/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

dispositive motions. Pursuant to the scheduling order filed January 27, 2006, discovery was to

be completed by May 26, 2006, and dispositive motions were due by July 21, 2006. The record

reflects that a request for waiver of service of process was sent to defendant Baughman on May

23, 2006, after expiration of time set for completion of discovery, and that his answer to the

amended complaint was timely filed on July 18, 2006. Good cause appearing, defendants’

request will be granted and the court will separately issue a revised scheduling order for this

action. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s July 13, 2006 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied; 

2. Defendants’ July 19, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted; and

3. A revised scheduling order for this action will issue forthwith.

DATED: July 27, 2006.

12/mp

mart0014.31

Case 2:04-cv-00014-ALA Document 58 Filed 07/28/06 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 10.21****FIRST AMENDMENT**     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT, dated as of February 7, 2005 (this “Amendment”) to that certainReceivables Financing Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2004 (the “Financing Agreement”),among HL Funding II, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), CAFCO, LLC, as an“Investor”, Citibank, N.A., as a “Bank”, Citicorp North America, Inc., as the program agent(“Program Agent”) and as an “Investor Agent”, HLI Operating Company, Inc., as “Servicer”(“HLIOC”) and Citibank, N.A., as the “Disbursement Agent”, and the other financialinstitutions from time to time a party thereto, as “Investors”, “Banks” and/or “Investor Agents”(as each such quoted term is defined in the Financing Agreement), is by and among the Borrower,HLIOC, the Program Agent, the Bank, the Investor Agent, the Investor and the Disbursement Agent.Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them inthe Financing Agreement, as amended hereby.SECTION 1. Amendment. For valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which ishereby acknowledged, and subject to the fulfillment of the conditions set forth below, the partieshereto agree that the Financing Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the definition of“Originator” in its entirety and substituting the following in its stead:“Originator” means each of the Persons designated as such onSchedule 1.01-4, as such Schedule 1.01-4 may,notwithstanding Section 11.01 of the Financing Agreement, be amended,restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time with thewritten consent of the Program Agent and the Borrower.SECTION 2. Representations and Warranties. Each of the Borrower and Servicer (each an“HL Person”) hereby severally represents and warrants to each Investor, Bank, InvestorAgent, the Program Agent and the Disbursement Agent that, as of the Effective Date: (a) all of therepresentations and warranties of such HL Person in the Financing Agreement and in the otherTransaction Documents are true and correct in all material respects on and as of the Effective Dateas though made to each Investor, Bank, Investor Agent, the Program Agent and the Disbursement Agenton and as of such date (other than representations and warranties which expressly speak or aredeemed made as of a different date, which representations shall be made only on such date), and (b)no Event of Termination or Incipient Event of Termination has occurred and is continuing.SECTION 3. Effective Date. This Amendment shall become effective as of the date firstabove written (the “Effective Date”) upon the satisfaction of the following conditions:     (a) The Program Agent shall have received counterparts hereof executed by each of the partieshereto; and     (b) Each of the representations and warranties contained in this Amendment shall be trueand correct in all material respects on and as of the Effective Date. Citicorp North America, Inc./HL Funding II, Inc.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE McGEE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1603 GEB DAD P

vs.

O. DICKINSON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed May 13, 2005, plaintiff's amended complaint

was dismissed with leave to file a second amended complaint. Plaintiff has now filed a second

amended complaint.

The second amended complaint states a cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of the second amended complaint

are proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: Chief Medical Officer

R.W. Sandham, Dr. O. Dickinson, Dr. G. James, Chief Physician and Surgeon S.M. Roche, Dr.

W. Diggins, and Dr. P. Mangis. 

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 14 Filed 07/21/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff six USM-285 forms, one summons,

an instruction sheet and a copy of the second amended complaint filed June 20, 2005.

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;

b. One completed summons;

c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 1

above; and 

d. Seven copies of the endorsed second amended complaint filed June 20,

2005. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States

Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4

without payment of costs. 

DATED: July 20, 2005.

DAD:4

rich1603.1amd

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 14 Filed 07/21/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE McGEE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1603 GEB DAD P

vs.

O. DICKINSON, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 completed summons form

 completed USM-285 forms

 copies of the 

 Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 14 Filed 07/21/05 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN WILLIAM WALLACE,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-04-0680 WBS GGH PS

vs.

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On October 11, 2005, plaintiff filed two documents, both styled “Report and

Complaint.” This action was closed on July 16, 2004. Plaintiff’s filings do not appear to be ones

contemplated by the Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure. Therefore, these documents

will be placed in the file and disregarded.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 10/31/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:mb

Wallace680.ord

Case 2:04-cv-00680-WBS-GGH Document 17 Filed 10/31/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.2.d


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-18139 on Form S-3 of Kansas City Power & Light Company of our report dated
January 30, 2002 (relating to the financial statements of DTI Holdings, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") not presented separately herein and which report
expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring
to the Company's filing for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Federal
Bankruptcy Code, substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a
going concern and an impairment charge recorded by the Company), appearing in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Power & Light Company for the year
ended December 31, 2002.


/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
February 27, 2003
**Exhibit      32.1**

| 1.   | The                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period                ended September 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the                requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                Act of                1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the                Company. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| DATE:  | November                5, 2007 |   | BY:    | /S/                Scott V. Fainor                              |
|--------|---------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                            |   |   | Scott                V. Fainor                                  |
|   |                            |   |   | President                and Chief Executive Officer            |
|   |                            |   |   |                                                            |
|   |                            |   |   |                                                            |
|   |                            |   |   |                                                            |
| DATE:  | November                5, 2007 |   | BY:    | /S/                Eugene T. Sobol                              |
|   |                            |   |   | Eugene                T. Sobol                                  |
|   |                            |   |   | Senior                Executive Vice President, Chief Financial |
|   |                            |   |   | Officer                and Treasurer                            |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to KNBT Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained      by KNBT Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission      or      its staff upon request.*
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY L. BROWN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0055 LKK GGH P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve a response to

defendant’s November 21, 2005 cross motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s December 7, 2005 motion for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and

serve a response to defendant’s November 21, 2005 cross motion for summary judgment. 

Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed seven days thereafter.

DATED: 12/21/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:mp; brow0055.36

Case 2:04-cv-00055-LKK -GGH Document 51 Filed 12/22/05 Page 1 of 1
|  |  | To provide better service in alerting the American                  people to unsafe, hazardous or defective products, six federal agencies with vastly different                  jurisdictions have joined together to create www.recalls.gov -- a "one stop shop" for U.S. Government                  recalls.

Follow the tabs above to obtain the latest recall                  information, to report a dangerous product, or to learn important safety tips.
Consumer Products | Motor Vehicles | Boats | Food | Medicine | Cosmetics | Environmental Products
Privacy and Security Notice.            Vulnerability Disclosure Policy.            This site is provided as a resource for federal recalls.            Please direct questions about specific recalls to the appropriate agencies listed above. Questions about            this web site can be directed to webteam@cpsc.gov |
|--|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY BARBARIN, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0894 FCD KJM P

vs.

A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an amended petition for a

writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Because petitioner may be entitled to relief if the claimed violation of

constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner’s

amended habeas petition.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner’s habeas petition

within sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An

answer shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the issues

presented in the petition. See Rule 5, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

Case 2:04-cv-00894-MDS Document 19 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. If the response to the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner’s reply, if any,

shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer;

3. If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner’s opposition or

statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after

service of the motion, and respondents’ reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fifteen days

thereafter; and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of

the amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Jo Graves,

Senior Assistant Attorney General.

DATED: June 15, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

barb0894.100

Case 2:04-cv-00894-MDS Document 19 Filed 06/16/05 Page 2 of 2