Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Notices 9513 

to assess antidumping duties on all 

imports of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the effective 

date of the suspension of liquidation. 

Notification Regarding APO 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to the parties subject to administrative 

protective order (‘‘APO’’) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely 

notification of return or destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. This 

determination and notice are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. 

This determination and notice are 

issued and published in accordance 

with sections 735(d) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: February 23, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I 

Changes from the Preliminary 

Determination 

General Issues 

Comment 1: Whether to Clarify the 

Scope With Respect to Blended 

Products 

Comment 2: Whether to Exclude 

Carbochem Products from the Scope 

Comment 3: Whether to Correct Freight 

Ministerial Error 

Comment 4: Whether to Change the 

Department’s Zeroing Methodology 

Comment 5: Whether to Grant a By–

Product Offset for Activated Carbon 

Products 

Comment 6: Treatment of Non–

Production Electricity and Labor 

Company–Specific Issues 

Jacobi Issues 

Comment 7: Whether to Apply Total 

Adverse Facts Available to Jacobi 

Comment 8: Treatment of Powdered 

Activated Carbon Sold to the United 

States 

Comment 9: Whether to Recalculate 

Jacobi’s FOPs to Include By–products in 

the Denominator 

Comment 10: Whether to Apply 

Adverse Facts Available for DTFH 

Comment 11: Whether to Apply 

Adverse Facts Available to Jacobi’s 

Electricity and Labor 

Comment 12: Treatment of Impregnated 

Material at NXGH for which No Data 

Were Reported 

Comment 13: Whether to Impute 

Verification Findings of NXGH and 

DTHB to Jacobi’s Other Suppliers 

Comment 14: Treatment of Water 

Comment 15: Treatment of Packing and 

Factory Labor 

Comment 16: Valuation of Carbonized 

Material 

Comment 17: Valuation of Coal 

Comment 18: Valuation of Chemical 

Inputs 

Comment 19: Calculation of Indirect 

Selling Expense 

CCT Issues 

Comment 20: Whether to Continue to 

Apply Adverse Facts Available to 

Certain CCT Suppliers 

Comment 21: PXZ’s Pressroom Product 

Comment 22: Whether to Impute the 

Verification Findings of NXGH to CCT 

Comment 23: Production Denominator 

Comment 24: Calculation of Indirect 

Selling Expense 

Comment 25: U.S. Warehousing 

Expense 

Comment 26: Marine Insurance 

Jilin Issues 

Comment 27: Whether to Apply 

Adverse Facts Available to Jilin Bright 

Future 

[FR Doc. E7–3693 Filed 3–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–427–801) 

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from 

France: Initiation of an Antidumping 

Duty Changed–Circumstances Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to a request for a 

changed–circumstances review from 

Societe Nouvelle de Fabrication 

Aeronautique S.A.S.U., SKF France 

S.A., and SKF Aerospace France S.A.S. 

and pursuant to section 751(b) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and 19 

CFR § 351.216 and 351.221(c)(3), the 

Department of Commerce is initiating a 

changed–circumstances review of the 

antidumping duty order on ball bearings 

and parts thereof from France. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 2, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Edythe Artman at (202) 482–3931 or 

Richard Rimlinger at (202) 482–4477, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office 5, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published antidumping 

duty orders on ball bearings, cylindrical 

roller bearings, and spherical plain 

bearings and parts thereof from France 

on May 15, 1989. See Antidumping Duty 

Orders: Ball Bearings, Cylindrical Roller 

Bearings, Spherical Plain Bearings, and 

Parts Thereof From France, 54 FR 20902 

(May 15, 1989). The order on cylindrical 

roller bearings and parts thereof from 

France was revoked, effective January 1, 

2000. See Revocation of Antidumping 

Duty Orders on Certain Bearings From 

Hungary, Japan, Romania, Sweden, 

France, Germany, Italy, and the United 

Kingdom, 65 FR 42667 (July 11, 2000). 

The order on spherical plain bearings 

and parts thereof from France was also 

revoked, effective July 11, 2005. See 

Antifriction Bearings and Parts Thereof 

from France and Singapore: Revocation 

of Antidumping Duty Orders, 71 FR 

54468 (September 15, 2006). 

Societe Nouvelle de Fabrication 

Aeronautique S.A.S.U. (SNFA) and SKF 

France S.A. have participated in 

numerous administrative reviews of the 

order on ball bearings and parts thereof 

from France. On August 11, 2000, the 

Department revoked the order, effective 

May 1, 1999, with respect to sales of 

bearings by SNFA. See Antifriction 

Bearings (Other Than Tapered Roller 

Bearings) and Parts Thereof from 

France, Germany, Italy, Japan, 

Romania, Singapore, Sweden and the 

United Kingdom; Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Revocation of Orders in 

Part, 65 FR 49219 (August 11, 2000). 

On January 9, 2007, SNFA and SKF 

France S.A. and SKF Aerospace France 

S.A.S. (collectively SKF France) 

requested that the Department initiate 

and conduct a changed–circumstances 

review in order to determine that, for 

purposes of the order on ball bearings 

and parts thereof, SNFA is not a 

successor–in-interest to SKF France 

following SNFA’s acquisition by that 

company and that it is the successor–ininterest to the pre–acquisition SNFA. 

We did not receive any other 

comments. 

Scope of the Order 

The products covered by these orders 

are ball bearings (other than tapered 

roller bearings) and parts thereof. These 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
9514 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Notices 

products include all bearings that 

employ balls as the rolling element. 

Imports of these products are classified 

under the following categories: 

antifriction balls, ball bearings with 

integral shafts, ball bearings (including 

radial ball bearings) and parts thereof, 

and housed or mounted ball bearing 

units and parts thereof. 

Imports of these products are 

classified under the following 

Harmonized Tariff Schedules of the 

United States (HTSUS) subheadings: 

3926.90.45, 4016.93.00, 4016.93.10, 

4016.93.50, 6909.19.5010, 8431.20.00, 

8431.39.0010, 8482.10.10, 8482.10.50, 

8482.80.00, 8482.91.00, 8482.99.05, 

8482.99.2580, 8482.99.35, 8482.99.6595, 

8483.20.40, 8483.20.80, 8483.50.8040, 

8483.50.90, 8483.90.20, 8483.90.30, 

8483.90.70, 8708.50.50, 8708.60.50, 

8708.60.80, 8708.70.6060, 8708.70.8050, 

8708.93.30, 8708.93.5000, 8708.93.6000, 

8708.93.75, 8708.99.06, 8708.99.31, 

8708.99.4960, 8708.99.50, 8708.99.5800, 

8708.99.8080, 8803.10.00, 8803.20.00, 

8803.30.00, 8803.90.30, and 8803.90.90. 

Although the HTSUS item numbers 

above are provided for convenience and 

customs purposes, written descriptions 

of the scope of this order remain 

dispositive. 

For a listing of scope determinations 

which pertain to the order on ball 

bearings and parts thereof, see the Scope 

Determination Memorandum (Scope 

Memorandum) from the Antifriction 

Bearings Team to Laurie Parkhill, dated 

March 2, 2006. The Scope 

Memorandum is on file in the Central 

Records Unit (CRU), main Commerce 

building, Room B–099, in the General 

Issues record (A–100–001) for the 2004/ 

2005 administrative reviews of the 

orders on antifriction bearings. 

Initiation of Changed–Circumstances 

Review 

Pursuant to section 751(b)(1) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and 19 CFR § 351.216 (2005), the 

Department will conduct a changed–

circumstances review upon receipt of 

information concerning, or a request 

from an interested party for a review of, 

an antidumping duty order which 

shows changed circumstances sufficient 

to warrant a review of the order. SNFA 

and SKF France claim that they have 

satisfied the criteria to warrant such a 

review. See 19 CFR § 351.216(d). We 

agree that the information submitted by 

SNFA and SKF France demonstrates 

changed circumstances sufficient to 

warrant a review. Therefore, in 

accordance with the above–referenced 

regulation, the Department is initiating 

a changed–circumstances review. 

SNFA and SKF France also claim that 

the information contained in their 

January 9, 2007, request demonstrates 

that the post–acquisition SNFA is the 

successor–in-interest to the pre–

acquisition SNFA. The requesting 

parties ask that the Department thus 

refrain from issuing a changed–

circumstances questionnaire. The 

Department finds that the request does 

not clearly establish the entity to which 

SNFA is the successor–in-interest. 

Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

§ 351.221(b)(2) and (4) and 19 CFR 

§ 351.221(c)(3)(i), we will issue a 

questionnaire requesting factual 

information for the review and will 

publish a notice of preliminary results 

of the antidumping duty changed–

circumstances review in the Federal 

Register. The notice will set forth the 

factual and legal conclusions upon 

which our preliminary results are based. 

Pursuant to 19 CFR § 351.221(b)(4)(ii), 

interested parties will have an 

opportunity to comment on the 

preliminary results of review. We will 

issue final results of review no later 

than the regulatory deadline in 

accordance with 19 CFR § 351.216(e). 

During the course of this antidumping 

duty changed–circumstances review, we 

will not change the cash–deposit 

requirements for the subject 

merchandise. The cash–deposit rate will 

be altered, if warranted, pursuant only 

to the final results of this review. 

This notice of initiation is in 

accordance with section 751(b)(1) of the 

Act, 19 CFR § 351.216(b) and (d), and 19 

CFR § 351.221(b)(1). 

Dated: February 23, 2007. 

David M. Spooner, 

Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–3697 Filed 3–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

(A–427–808) 

Certain Corrosion–Resistant Carbon 

Steel Flat Products from France: 

Notice of Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (the Department) is 

rescinding its administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on certain 

corrosion–resistant carbon steel flat 

products (CORE) from France for the 

period August 1, 2005, through July 31, 

2006. 

EFFECTIVE DATE: March 2, 2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy 

Lao or Angelica Mendoza, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office 7, Import 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–7924 and (202) 

482–3019, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On August 1, 2006, the Department 

published in the Federal Register its 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CORE from 

France. See Antidumping or 

Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 

Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review, 71 

FR 43441 (August 1, 2006). In response, 

on August 31, 2006, United States Steel 

Corporation (U.S. Steel), a domestic 

interested party, requested an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on CORE from 

France for the period of review (POR) of 

August 1, 2005, through July 31, 2006, 

with respect to entries of merchandise 

exported or shipped by Duferco Coating 

SA and Sorral SA (collectively, Duferco 

Sorral). Respondent Duferco Sorral did 

not request an administrative review. 

On September 29, 2006, the Department 

initiated an administrative review of 

Duferco Sorral. See Initiation of 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Administrative, 71 FR 57465 (September 

29, 2006). On October 16, 2006, the 

Department issued its antidumping duty 

questionnaire to Duferco Sorral. On 

November 13, 2006, Duferco Sorral and 

its U.S. affiliate, Duferco Steel, Inc., 

filed certifications that they did not, 

directly or indirectly, enter for 

consumption, or sell, export, or ship for 

entry for consumption in the United 

States, subject merchandise during the 

POR. See Letter to the Secretary from 

White and Case LLP, dated November 

13, 2006. 

On December 11, 2006, the 

Department issued a ‘‘No Shipment 

Inquiry’’ to U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP) to confirm that there 

were no shipments or entries of CORE 

from France exported by Duferco Sorral 

during the POR of the instant 

administrative review. On December 27, 

2006, the Department confirmed, based 

on its internal review of CBP data and 

the results of its CBP inquiry, there were 

no entries of subject merchandise 

exported or shipped by Duferco Sorral 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES