alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4351 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize 

certain poison control programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4351 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Poison Control Centers 

3 Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF POISON CONTROL PRO5 GRAMS. 

6 (a) NATIONAL TOLL-FREE NUMBER AND OTHER

7 COMMUNICATION CAPABILITIES.—Section 1271(c) of the 

8 Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d–71(c)) is 

9 amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 2020 through 2024’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2025 through 2029’’. 

11 (b) PROMOTING POISON CONTROL CENTER UTILIZA12 TION.—Section 1272(c) of the Public Health Service Act 

13 (42 U.S.C. 300d–72(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal 

14 years 2020 through 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 

15 2025 through 2029’’. 

16 (c) POISON CONTROL CENTER GRANT PROGRAM.— 

17 Section 1273(g) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

18 U.S.C. 300d–73(g)) is amended by striking ‘‘fiscal years 

19 2020 through 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 2025 

20 through 2029’’. 

Passed the Senate July 11 (legislative day, July 10), 

2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4351 

AN ACT 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to 

reauthorize certain poison control programs.
No. 59527.

protest 839528-G (New York).

#### M. Modlin & Son *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of moufflons the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57768, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vitasti, Inc.  (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tammy-Lynn McNabb,
      Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: May
      21,
      2006


By: /s/
      TAMMY-LYNN MCNABB





Name:
      Tammy-Lynn McNabb


Title:
        Chief Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0776 LKK PAN P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On November 30, 2005, the court gave plaintiff time to file an amended

complaint. On January 9, 2006, plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On March 9, 2006,

plaintiff filed a request for an order directing the United States Marshal to serve process on

defendants and a request to “lodge” in chambers a copy of his complaint.

The court addresses the amended complaint in a separate order. Plaintiff’s other

request has no basis in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the court will disregard plaintiff’s

March 9, 2006, request for an order directing the United States marshal to serve process on 

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 58 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

defendants and request to “lodge” in chambers a copy of his complaint. The Clerk of the Court is

directed to make a notation on the requests to that effect.

DATED: April 24, 2006.

\004;john0776.disregard

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 58 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4411 

To require Transmission Organizations to allow aggregators of retail customers to submit to organized wholesale electric markets bids that aggregate demand flexibility of customers of certain utilities, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mr. DURBIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require Transmission Organizations to allow aggregators 

of retail customers to submit to organized wholesale electric markets bids that aggregate demand flexibility of 

customers of certain utilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsive Energy De5 mand Unlocks Clean Energy Act’’ or the ‘‘REDUCE 

6 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4411 IS

1 SEC. 2. AGGREGATOR BIDDING INTO ORGANIZED POWER 

2 MARKETS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any prohibition 

4 established by State law or a State commission (as defined 

5 in section 3 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 796)) 

6 with respect to who may bid into an organized wholesale 

7 electric market, each Transmission Organization shall, 

8 consistent with any applicable market rules that do not 

9 establish such a prohibition, allow aggregators of retail 

10 customers to submit bids that aggregate demand flexibility 

11 of customers of utilities that distributed more than 

12 4,000,000 megawatt-hours in the previous fiscal year. 

13 (b) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 1 year after the 

14 date of enactment of this Act, the Federal Energy Regu15 latory Commission shall issue a rule to carry out the re16 quirements of subsection (a). 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES JOSEPH DURAN, JR.,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1875 DFL KJM P

vs.

JAMES POPE,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 12, 2005, the court ordered respondent to

show cause why he should not be sanctioned for failing to respond to the court’s May 17, 2005

order. Respondent filed a response to the order to show cause on October 18, 2005. 

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01875-JKS-KJM Document 9 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court’s October 12, 2005 order to show cause is discharged;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve respondent’s counsel with a copy of

petitioner’s November 11, 2004 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus; and

3. Respondent shall file a response to petitioner’s application for writ of habeas

corpus within thirty days of this order. 

DATED: October 25, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

dura1875.ext

Case 2:04-cv-01875-JKS-KJM Document 9 Filed 10/26/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Cyco.net,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  each  of the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.




       By:  /s/   Daniel  Urrea      November 22, 2004
         -------------------------
         Daniel Urrea
         Chief Financial Officer



                                       23
Exhibit 10.1

 

Execution Version

 

NorthStar Asset Management Group, Inc.

 

October 13, 2016

 

Debra Hess

c/o NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc.

399 Park Avenue, 18th Floor

New York, NY  10022

 

Dear Debra:

 

The purpose of this letter is to amend the letter agreement entered into by and among you Northstar Asset Management Group Inc. (“NSAM”) and NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (“NRF”) dated as of June 2, 2016 (the “Original Letter Agreement”).  All capitalized terms in this letter that are not otherwise defined will have the meaning set forth in the Original Letter Agreement.

 

The parties acknowledge and agree that the last sentence of the third paragraph of the Original Letter Agreement will be deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:

 

“The number of Shares subject to the Replacement Award will be determined by dividing (i) $8,622,725 by (ii) the greater of (A) the volume weighted average price of a Share over the first five trading days immediately following the Closing Date and (B) $15 per Share.”

 

Except as expressly amended hereby, the Original Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms.

 

This letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

 

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 











 

Please sign below to indicate your acknowledgement and acceptance of the terms of this side letter.

 

 

	
 
    	
Very   truly yours, 

 

NORTHSTAR   ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   RONALD J. LIEBERMAN
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Ronald   J. Lieberman
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Executive   Vice President, General counsel & Secretary
    


 

 

Agreed to and acknowledged

as of the 13th day of October, 2016:

 

 

	
/s/ DEBRA A. HESS
    	
 
    


 

[SIGNATURE PAGE HESS SIDE LETTER]

 











 

Agreed to and acknowledged by:

 

NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP.

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   ALBERT TYLIS
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Albert   Tylis
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
President
    	
 
    


 

[SIGNATURE PAGE HESS SIDE LETTER]
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 15

- 00020

- CR Corey DENTS , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 290th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2014CR7707 Honorable Melisa Skinner, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice Delivered and Filed: March 4, 2015
DIS MISSED Corey Dents pleaded nolo contendere to a second offense of Assault

- Family pursuant to a plea bargain agreement

. As part of his ple a - bargain, Dents signed a separate “Waiver of Appeal.” The trial court imposed sentence and signed a certificate stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See
T E X
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Dents timely filed a notice of appeal, the clerk sent copies of the certification and notice of appeal to this court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record,04

- 15

- 00020

- CR which includes the plea bargain agreement and the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by t he prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant and that the trial court denied permission to appeal

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). We have reviewed the clerk’s record, and the trial court’s certification appears to accurately state that this is a plea barg ain case and
Dents does not have a right to appeal. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). This court must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).
On January 23, 2015, we gave Dents notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless written consent to appeal an d an amended certification showing Dents has the right to appeal were signed by the trial judge and made part of the appellate record by February 13, 2015. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, ord er), disp. on merits , No. 04

- 03

- 00176

- CR, 2003 WL 21508347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). Neither written permission to appeal nor an amended certification showing Dents has the right to appeal has been filed. We therefore dis miss this appeal. T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2

-
EXHIBIT 99(i)

                                 CERTIFICATION
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE
             UNITED STATES CODE AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of J.W.
Mays, Inc. for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Lloyd
J. Shulman, Chairman, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating
Officer of J.W. Mays, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     J.W. Mays, Inc.

Dated: October 11, 2002

                                                /s/ Lloyd J. Shulman
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Lloyd J. Shulman
                                            Chairman, President, Chief Executive
                                            Officer and Chief Operating Officer



                                       19
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Donald J. Lewis, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clearant, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures asof the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s abilityto record, process, summarize, and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 9, 2005 /s/ Donald J. Lewis   Donald J. Lewis  *Chief Financial Officer*  *(Principal Financial Officer)*
No. 52587. protest 132458-K (San Francisco).

#### Arthur J. Fritz & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It appeared that the goods were subject to the British purchase tax and on entry a duress certificate was filed in which the importer certified that it had entered the merchandise at a value higher than that defined in the tariff act because of advances by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal for reappraisement. The collector disregarded said certificate and liquidated upon the entered value bn the ground that the certificate was not signed, the signature being in typewriting. Under authority of *Clinton Smullyan Associates*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 7, C. A. D. 363) the court sustained the claim that the liquidation should have been made upon the basis of the value found by the court on appeal to reappraisement (Reap. Dec. 6478), in which it was held that the British purchase tax was no part of the entered value.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH W. MILLS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1661 WBS PAN P

vs.

COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, 

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On February 1, 2006, plaintiff filed a document styled as a “Request for

Declaration of Judgment,” and on July 17, 2006, plaintiff filed another document. This civil

rights action was closed on October 5, 2004. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff

since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. 

DATED: August 29, 2006.

12

mill661.58

Case 2:04-cv-01661-WBS-PAN Document 9 Filed 08/30/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23, Form 10-K            Kansas City Life Insurance Company

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors            Kansas City Life Insurance Company:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (Nos. 333-89984, 333-52290, and 333-98805) on Form N-4 of Kansas City Life Insurance Company of our report dated February 27, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Kansas City Life Insurance Company as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated            statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and all related financial statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which appears in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Life Insurance Company. Our report dated February 27, 2009 on the consolidated financial statements also contains            an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company adopted American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 05-1, *Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges in Insurance Contracts*, effective January 1, 2007 and Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, *Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Ta**xes – an            interpretation of FASB **Statement 109*, effective January 1, 2007.

/s/KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP

Kansas City, Missouri            February 27, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DoD. 

# ACTION:

Notice to Delete Systems of Records. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy is deleting two system of records notices from its existing inventory of records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. 

# DATES:

Effective March 7, 2007. 

# ADDRESSES:

Department of the Navy, PA/FOIA Policy Branch, Chief of Naval Operations, (DNS-36), 2000 Navy Pentagon, Washington, DC 20350-2000. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Doris Lama at (202) 685-6545. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Department of the Navy systems of records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and are available from the address above.                 

The proposed deletions are not within the purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, which requires the submission of a new or altered system report. 

Dated: February 28, 2007. 

C.R. Choate, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

## Deletion: 

## N01070-4 

Naval Reserve Security Group Personnel Records (February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10697). 

*Reason:*                     System is obsolete. Information on reservists is maintained in their military personnel file, security clearance file, etc.                 

## N04410-1 

File of Records of Acquisition, Transfer and Disposal of Privately Owned Vehicles (September 20, 1993, 58 FR 48852). 

*Reason:*                     Activity has been disestablished and all files destroyed.                 

[FR Doc. E7-4026 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-06-P