alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.1
AMENDMENT TO
CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC
AMENDED AND RESTATED 2009 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”) to the Charter Communications, Inc. Amended and Restated 2009 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is dated as of October 25, 2016 (the “Amendment Effective Date”).


1.Non-Transferability of Options.  Section 6.1(a) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated as follows:


No Option shall be transferable by the Optionee other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or pursuant to a domestic relations order (within the meaning of Rule 16a-12 promulgated under the Exchange Act). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion, set forth in the Agreement evidencing an Option at the time of grant or thereafter, that the Option may be transferred to (i) one or more members of the Optionee’s family, (ii) a trust for the benefit of the Optionee and/or one or more members of the Optionee’s family, (iii) a trust under the terms of which the Optionee has retained a “qualified interest” within the meaning of Section 2702(b)(1) of the Code and/or a reversionary interest, or (iv) a corporation, partnership or limited liability company in which the Optionee, a trust described in clauses (ii) or (iii), and/or one or more members of the Optionee’s family own all of the outstanding shares, partnership interests or membership interests, as applicable (any such person or entity, a “Permitted Transferee”).  For this purpose, members of the Optionee’s family shall mean the Optionee’s spouse, parents, children, stepchildren, grandchildren, and more remote descendants, the Optionee’s siblings and descendants of such siblings, and the spouses of such persons.  During the lifetime of the Optionee (or, following transfer, the Permitted Transferee), the Option shall be exercisable only by the Optionee (or, following transfer, the Permitted Transferee).  The terms of an Option shall be final, binding and conclusive upon the beneficiaries, executors, administrators, heirs, successors and Permitted Transferees of the Optionee.


2.Effective Date.  This Amendment shall become effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.  Except as expressly set forth herein, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.


[End of Document]
Exhibit






Exhibit 10.2




Change to Director Compensation




As part of their compensation for service on the Board of Directors of CDI Corp. (the “Company”), each non-employee director of the Company receives, at the beginning of the one-year period between annual meetings of the shareholders of the Company, a grant of shares of Time-Vested Deferred Stock (TVDS).  The shares of TVDS vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, at which time they are converted into an equivalent number of shares of CDI common stock.  Prior to May 2016, the value of the annual TVDS grant to each non-employee director was $100,000.  In May 2016, the Board approved an amendment to this arrangement, imposing a cap of 10,000 shares of TVDS for each annual grant to a director.  Under this amendment, the number of shares of TVDS to be granted to each director annually will equal to the lesser of (a) $100,000 divided by the market price of CDI stock on the date of grant and (b) 10,000 shares.  This change went into effect with the May 2016 TVDS grants to directors, with the result that the number of shares of TVDS awarded to each director was limited to 10,000.  The closing price on the date of grant was $5.64 and, accordingly, the grants had an award date value of $56,400 as compared to $100,000.
No. 51415.

#### Protests 57861-K, etc., of Edward Boote et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keeps, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of oatmeals or oatmeal saucers and chowder cups or puree cups the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Copeland & Thompson, Inc.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833) and *Johnson Bros.*v. *United States*(15 id. 113, C. D. 955). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
No. 60850.

#### Altray Company *v.*United States,

protest 272738-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed.
EXHIBIT 99.1

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

In a letter dated March 25, 2002, our independent public accountants, Arthur
Andersen LLP ("Andersen"), represented to us that their audit of the
consolidated financial statements of Alliant Energy Corporation and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and for the year then ended was subject
to Andersen's quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing
practice to provide reasonable assurance that their engagement was conducted
in compliance with professional standards and that there was appropriate
continuity of Andersen personnel working on the audit, availability of
national office consultation and availability of personnel at foreign
affiliates of Andersen to conduct the relevant portions of the audit.




ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION


By:      /s/ John E. Kratchmer
         ---------------------
Name:        John E. Kratchmer
Title:       Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer


March 25, 2002
EXHIBIT 99
                           ==========

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bliss
Essentials Corp. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Gelfand,
Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the quarterly report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the quarterly report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date: August 10, 2003        /s/ Thomas Gelfand
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer of
                              Bliss Essentials Corp., Registrant
(Reap. Dec. 10051)

#### Webrib Steel Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 9366, etc.

(Decided July 14, 1961)

*Harrington Harlow*for the plaintiff.

*William H. Orriolc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule attached to and made a part of this decision involve th© proper value for dutiable purposes- of certain articles of metal

A stipulation of fact has been entered into by the parties hereto5 wherein it has been ¡agreed that the market value or price at the'time' ©f exportation of the involved merchandise, at which such or similar' *416merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, is the appraised value in each case, less 3 per centum discount. It was further stipulated and agreed by the parties that there was no higher export value for merchandise such as or similar to the merchandise herein involved at the time of exportation thereof.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(c)), as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, is the proper basis for value of the merchandise in issue, and that said value is the appraised value in each case, less 3 per centum discount. As to any other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4188 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4188

 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit trading of water and 
       water rights for future delivery, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2024

  Ms. Warren (for herself, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Markey, and Mr. Sanders) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
           Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit trading of water and 
       water rights for future delivery, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Future of Water Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF TRADING IN WATER AND WATER RIGHTS FOR FUTURE 
              DELIVERY.

    (a) Commodity Exchange Act.--Section 1a(9) of the Commodity 
Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a(9)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(7 U.S.C. 13-1)) and'' and inserting ``(7 
        U.S.C. 13-1)),'';
            (2) by inserting ``water or water rights (or any index, 
        measure, value, or data related to water or water rights), 
        and'' after ``receipts), and''; and
            (3) by striking ``receipts) in which'' and inserting 
        ``receipts, and water or water rights, or any index, measure, 
        value, or data related to water or water rights) in which''.
    (b) Public Law 85-839.--The first section of Public Law 85-839 (7 
U.S.C. 13-1) is amended in the first sentence of subsection (a)--
            (1) by inserting ``water or water rights (or any index, 
        measure, value, or data related to water or water rights),'' 
        after ``sale of''; and
            (2) by striking ``receipts)'' and inserting ``receipts),''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 56395.

petition 6642-R (Memphis).

#### Royal Hickman Industries *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the official record showing that the motion of respondent was well founded, the petition was dismissed.