alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMENDMENT
      TO DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

     

    This
      Amendment to Distribution Agreement made and entered into this 25th day of
      June
      2008 by and between Flurida Group Inc. (hereinafter refers to as “Flurida”),
      having its principal offices at 800 W. 5th
      Ave.
      Suite 210, Naperville, IL 60563, USA, and Zhong Nan Fu Rui Mechanical
      Electronics Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (hereinafter refers to as “Zhong Nan Fu
      Rui”), having its principal offices at Plant 3# Xin`an Industrial Park, Economic
      and Technological Development Zone,Qingdao,China,266500 (collectively, the
      “Parties”).
      

     

    NOW,
      THEREFORE,
      the
      Parties agree to the amendment as follows:

     

    Part
      1 - Cooperation on Ice making product lines 

     

    	A.  	
            Amended
              to read as follows: Zhong
              Nan Fu Rui will design and develop icemakers and ice/water distributing
              systems with input from Flurida Group, Inc. All design and development
              responsibility shall be solely that of Zhong Nan Fu
              Rui.

          


     

    D. 
      Section D added: The purchase price Flurida will pay for all products subject
      to
      this agreement will be comparable to what Flurida would have paid a non-related
      party in arm’s-length transactions

     

    The
      remainder of the Agreement remains valid and in full
      force.

     

    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF,
      the
      Parties having agreed to the terms and conditions set forth herein signify
      their
      intention to be bound thereto through the signatures of their duly authorized
      representatives which are set forth below.

    


    
      	
              Flurida
                Group Inc. 

            	
              Zhong
                Nan Fu Rui 

            
	 	
              Mechanical
                Electronics Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

            
	 	 
	
              By:
                /s/ Jianfeng
                Ding

            	
              By
                /s/ Jianfeng
                Ding

            
	
              President
                

            	
              President
                

            
	 	 
	
              Date:
                June
                25, 2008

            	
              Date:
                June
                25, 2008
No. 61850.

#### Karl B. Rosen et al. *v.*United States,

protests 260244-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *B. L. Lemke & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 253, C. D, 1937), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#                 Book/Printed Material                Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan : country studies
Exhibit 10.16
  KATY
    INDUSTRIES, INC.
 DIRECTOR
    COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
    a.
    Each director receives a $10,000 annual retainer, paid annually
    in advance.  b.
    Each director receives the cash equivalent of 2,000 shares
    of the Companys common stock at the closing stock price
    the day prior to the annual meeting.  c.
    The chair of the Compensation Committee and the chair of the
    Audit Committee each receive an additional $6,000 annual
    retainer, paid annually in advance.    a.
    Each director is paid $2,500 for each full meeting of the board
    of directors he or she attends in person and $1,000 for each
    full meeting of the board of directors he or she attends
    telephonically.b.
    Each director is paid $1,000 for each full committee meeting of
    the board of directors he or she attends in person and $500 for
    each full committee meeting of the board of directors he or she
    attends telephonically.  3.
    Stock Appreciation Rights  a.
    Each director receives an annual stock appreciation right (SAR)
    grant of 2,000 stock appreciation rights at the May meeting of
    the board of directors each year. The exercise price is the fair
    market value on the date of grant. The director may exercise
    these stock appreciation rights at any time during the ten years
    from the date of grant.  4.
    Meeting Expenses  a.
    Katy reimburses directors for their expenses incurred in
    attending meetings of the board of director and committee
    meetings of the board of directors.  5.
    Deferred Compensation Plan  a.
    Each director may defer directors fees, retainers and
    other compensation paid for services as a director until the
    later of the directors attainment of age 62 or
    ceasing to be a director. Each director has 30 days before
    the beginning of a Plan Year (as defined in the Directors
    Deferred Compensation Plan) in which to elect to participate in
    the Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors may
    invest these amounts in one or more investment alternatives
    offered by Katy. Directors may elect to receive distributions of
    deferred amounts in a lump sum or five annual installments.
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
      to
      the best of his knowledge:





i.
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                May 15,
                2007
              
              /s/
                Zuo Sheng
                YuBy:
              Zuo
                Sheng
                YuTitle:
              Chief Executive Officer and
                President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

 

 

 

1 

Joint Notice of Dismissal With Prejudice; Order Thereon 

Case No. CIV.S-04-0930 DAD 

KEITH D. CABLE (SBN 170055) 

CABLE LAW OFFICES 

2377 Gold Meadow Way, Suite 100 

Gold River, California 95670 

Telephone: (916) 631-1588 

Facsimile: (916) 984-5775 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

EDWARD KEMPER 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EDWARD KEMPER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, 

 Defendant. 

Case No. CIV.S-04-0930 DAD 

JOINT NOTICE OF DISMISSAL 

WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER 

THEREON

COMES NOW, the parties to the above-captioned matter, by and through their respective 

undersigned counsel, and hereby files with the Court this Joint Notice of Dismissal with 

Prejudice. Each party to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 

WHEREFORE, the parties move this Court for the entry of the Final Order set forth 

below. 

Dated: April 29, 2005 By: /s/ 

KEITH D. CABLE 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Dated: April 29, 2005 By: /s/ 

ALAN COHEN 

Attorney for Defendant 

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS 

Case 2:04-cv-00930-DAD Document 19 Filed 05/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

 

 

 

2 

Joint Notice of Dismissal With Prejudice; Order Thereon 

Case No. CIV.S-04-0930 DAD 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EDWARD KEMPER, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS, 

Defendant. 

Case No. CIV.S-04-0930 DAD 

 FINAL ORDER 

 

ORDER

Having read the foregoing Joint Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice, and good cause 

appearing therefor, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is hereby dismissed with 

prejudice. Each party to bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. 

Dated: April 29, 2005

Ddad1/orders.consent/kemper0930.dism 

Case 2:04-cv-00930-DAD Document 19 Filed 05/02/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL A. WESBECHER, No. CIV S-04-0807-FCD-CMK

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

DANIEL FOY,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, who is no longer in custody, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

in this petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Following

numerous extensions of time, respondent’s response to the petition is currently due by September

15, 2005. Presently before the court is respondent’s request to suspend briefing and to set a

status conference. Respondent states that petitioner may be willing to voluntarily dismiss the

fourth claim presented in his federal habeas petition following resolution of a related state court

matter.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent’s request to suspend briefing is granted; and

2. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, petitioner shall file a

Case 2:04-cv-00807-FCD-CMK Document 30 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

status report, in writing, setting forth the status of the related state court matter, and also

informing the court whether petitioner desires to abandon any claims currently presented in his

federal habeas petition.

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions,

including dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute. 

DATED: September 8, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00807-FCD-CMK Document 30 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2
National Park Service
**Exhibit
      32.1**











CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of m-Wise, Inc. ("the Company") on Form
      10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mordechai Broudo,
      Chairman of the Board and Secretary, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to my knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully comply with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Mordechai
      Broudo


Mordechai
      Broudo, Chairman





Dated:
      November 14, 2008
EXHIBIT  31.2 CERTIFICATION

I, Sean P. McCarthy, President , certify that:

     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Suncoast
Naturals, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this quarterly report fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
         c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing
theequivalent functions):
         a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
         b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated: August 12, 2004   /s/ SEAN P. McCARTHY
                        -----------------------
                        Sean P. McCarthy
                        President
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on (i) Form S-16 (Nos. 2-51894, 2-55664, 2-63470 and 2-75654), (ii) Form S-8 (Nos. 2-77752, 33-10747, 33-24934, 33-33018, 33-54403, 33-54443, 33-54555, 333-08059, 333-08087, 333-60839, 333-42178, 333-53908, 333-74864, 33-46999, 333-122345, and 333-104264), (iii) Form S-3 (Nos. 2-84910, 33-26314, 33-23880, 33-42698, 33-44871, 33-45091, 33-54317, 33-69432, 333-04385, 333-40869, 333-44421, 333-55921, 333-68257, 333-54896, 333-55866, 333-91257, 333-91316-02, 333-102963, 333-102962-02, 333-122555-01 , 333-123408-01 and 333-129033-01 ), and (iv) Form S-4 (Nos. 333-102873 and 333-130582-01 ) of  Kinder Morgan, Inc. of our report dated March 13, 2006 relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K, and of our report dated March 13, 2006 relating to the financial statements, management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., which appears in Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K which is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K.







PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas

March 13, 2006
#### Kensington Carpet Company *v.*Philadelphia Rapid Transit Company, Appellant.

*Negligence*— Collision *between trolley car and automobile*— Case *for jury.*

In an action for damages for injuries to motor truck, the case is for the jury and a verdict for the plaintiff will be sustained, where the issue is one of fact as to the exact manner in which the accident occurred, and the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Argued October 21, 1924.

Appeal, No. 124, Oct. T., 1924, by defendant, from judgment of Municipal Court, Phila. Co., Feb. T., 1923, No. 304, on verdict for the plaintiff in the case of Kensington Carpet Company v. Phila. Rapid Transit Company.

Before Orlady, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and G-awthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

*115Trespass to recover damages for injuries to motor truck. Before Crane, J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

Verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $880 and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.

*Error assigned*was the refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

*David I. Scanlon,*for appellant.

*William, O. Armstrong,*for appellee.

November 17, 1924:

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

The only assignment of error is to the refusal of judgment n. o. v. Two collisions occurred close together. The damage compensated by the verdict resulted from the second collision. Plaintiff’s truck, in the car tracks in 6th Street, followed a short distance behind a street car approaching Westmoreland Street. The truck driver’s attention being attracted by a boy jumping on the back of the truck, he did not observe until within eight or ten feet of it, that the street car preceding him, had stopped at Westmoreland Street; he then put on brakes and, as he said, “collided slightly with” the trolley car, though without damaging his truck; having followed that street car for several hundred feet, he should have had his truck under control; failing that he was responsible for the collision, a responsibility, however, which is immaterial here, as the verdict implies that the jury accepted his statement that the collision was harmless.

When the truck and street car were standing as the first collision left them, a street car which had followed plaintiff’s truck, and shortly before, had been observed to be 225 feet behind it, ran into and damaged it. That second collision, the jury was warranted in attributing *116to the motorman’s negligence; he had been following the truck with ho obstruction of view for over 200 feet and had seen that it was preceded by another street car, approaching Westmoreland Street, which was a stopping point; it was therefore his duty to have his car under control with relation to the truck ahead of him. His testimony, if believed, relieves him of negligence and charges plaintiff’s driver with responsibility. But we must disregard his evidence in disposing of the point assigned for error, and take the evidence supporting the verdict; so considering the record, the appeal has no merit: Fisher v. Phila. Rapid Transit Co., 82 Pa. Superior Ct. 262, *264;*Gordon v. Traction Co., 247 Pa. 248.

Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit
      31.1




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




I,
      Zuo
      Sheng Yu, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of General Steel Holdings, Inc.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:




(a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
      relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this quarterly report is being prepared;




(b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by
      this report based on such evaluation;




(c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):




(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.


Date:
                February 12, 2007/s/
                Zuo Sheng YuBy:
                Zuo Sheng Yu
                Title:
                  Chief Executive Officer and
                  President