alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TONY MARQUET CAMPBELL, No. CIV-S-04-1709 MCE/CMK P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

G. WOODFORD,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 10, 2005, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings

and Recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and

which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. 

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

Case 2:04-cv-01709-MCE -CMK Document 12 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

Magistrate Judge's analysis. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed November 10,

2005, are adopted in full; 

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment

and close this file.

DATED: December 14, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01709-MCE -CMK Document 12 Filed 12/15/05 Page 2 of 2
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/ A (2) for the period ended March 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas Hagan, Acting Financial Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: April 6, 2009


                                              /s/ Thomas Hagan
                                              Thomas Hagan
                                              Acting Chief Financial Officer



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    In accordance with § 271.25 of its rules regarding availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on January 30-31, 2007.[1] 

                    The Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster price stability and promote sustainable growth in output. To further its long-run objectives, the Committee in the immediate future seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with maintaining the federal funds rate at an average of around 5                    1/4                     percent.                

By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, February 22, 2007.

Vincent R. Reinhart,

Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.

# Footnotes

1.                             Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee meeting on January 30-31, 2007, which includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, D.C. 20551. The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's annual report.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. E7-3543 Field 2-28-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Before Judge Maletz,

February 14, 1968

No. R68/17.

reappraisement R63/760 (Port Huron).

#### F. W. Myers and Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(52 Cust. Ct. 550, Reap. Dec. 10750), the court found and held that the proper basis for appraisement of the pipe organs and parts thereof is constructed value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that such' statutory value is equal to the entered value.
DeFazio et al., v. Hollister, Inc., et al., CIV. S 04-1358 WBS GGH 

Plaintiffs’ request for a Settlement Conference 

Page 1 of 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

----oo0oo---- 

JAMES P. DeFAZIO; et al., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

HOLLISTER, INC.; et al. 

 Defendants. 

NO. CIV. S-04-1358 WBS GGH 

----oo0oo---- 

ORDER 

Plaintiffs have filed an ex parte application for an early settlement 

conference before the assigned Magistrate Judge in this matter. However, 

because defendants do not unequivocally concur in the request, the court will 

not order an early settlement conference at this time. Plaintiffs’ application is 

therefore DENIED, without prejudice to its being renewed at such time as all 

parties might join in the request. 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 297 Filed 11/14/07 Page 1 of 2
DeFazio et al., v. Hollister, Inc., et al., CIV. S 04-1358 WBS GGH 

Plaintiffs’ request for a Settlement Conference 

Page 2 of 2 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 13, 2007 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 297 Filed 11/14/07 Page 2 of 2
**Part 1, Section V: USSGL Crosswalks to Standard**

**External Reports**

This section includes crosswalks for use in Fiscal Year 2019 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map

USSGL accounts to external reports in accordance with current reporting guidance from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB), and the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service).

Each report crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or column on the reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This subsidiary information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional information on attributes.

All crosswalks require pre-closing USSGL account balances.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by OMB and Fiscal Service:

**Section V	Page Number**

Balance Sheet (BS)	V BS - 1

Statement of Net Cost (SNC)	V SNC - 1

Statement of Changes in Net Position (SCNP)	V SCNP - 1

Statement of Custodial Activity (SCA)	V SCA - 1

Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR)	V SBR - 1

SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and	V SF 133/Sch P - 1

Budgetary Resources and Budget Program and Financing Schedule                             

Page 1 of 1

# image1.jpg
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK HUNGERFORD, No. CIV S-04-1455-LKK-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

HEROUX, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On November 10, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

Case 2:04-cv-01455-LKK -CMK Document 32 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed November 10, 2005, are adopted

in full;

2. Plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief is denied;

3. Plaintiff’s request for a hearing (Doc. 21), and request to amend his

motion for injunctive relief (Doc. 22) are denied as moot;

4. Defendant Glover, who is deceased, is dismissed from the action;

5. Defendant Heroux’s motion to dismiss is granted;

6. The complaint is dismissed with leave to amend; and

7. Plaintiff shall file a first amended complaint within 30 days of the date of

service of this order.

DATED: March 20, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01455-LKK -CMK Document 32 Filed 03/21/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      22,327,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               51,295,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,118,000
<INVENTORY>                                 53,369,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           159,553,000
<PP&E>                                      35,400,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,841,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             235,573,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       56,301,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,822,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 129,349,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               235,573,000
<SALES>                                    274,033,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           274,033,000
<CGS>                                      197,633,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              261,854,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (2,622,000)<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             236,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             14,565,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,922,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,643,000
<DISCONTINUED>                               1,959,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,602,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
<FN>
<F1>"Other-Expenses" includes Equity in income of other operations
to be disposed of, $539,000.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #12-2003 Limited
Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      13, 2008
EX-10.16.4



 Exhibit 10.16.4 

Amendment No. 1 to 

ATHENE HOLDING LTD., 

2014 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of Athene Holding Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company limited by shares (the
“Company”) desires to approve this amendment (this “Amendment”) to the 2014 SHARE INCENTIVE PLAN (the “Plan”) to enable Athene Asset Management Company, L.P., a Cayman Islands exempted limited
partnership and any successor entity or new entity that performs similar functions for the Company and its Subsidiaries (the “Asset Management Company”), to participate in the Plan for the benefit of its employees, directors or
consultants; 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and with the intent to be legally bound, the parties hereby agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment are used herein as defined in the Plan. 

  

	 	2.	The following sentence shall be inserted immediately succeeding the first sentence of Article IV of the Plan: 


“To effectuate the grant of Awards to employees or directors or consultants to the Asset Management Company, Awards may be granted to the
Asset Management Company for allocation by the Asset Management Company to such employees, directors or consultants.” 
  

	 	3.	This Amendment shall become effective as of the date hereof. 

  

	 	4.	This Amendment shall not constitute an amendment or waiver of any other provision of the Plan not expressly referred to herein. Except as expressly amended hereby, the provisions of the Plan are and shall remain in
full force and effect. 

  

	 	5.	All questions concerning the construction, interpretation and validity of this Amendment, the Plan and the instruments evidencing the Awards granted thereunder shall be governed by and construed and enforced in
accordance with the domestic laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to any choice or conflict of law provision or rule (whether of the State of Delaware or any other jurisdiction) that would cause the application of the laws of any
jurisdiction other than the State of Delaware. In furtherance of the foregoing, the internal law of the State of Delaware will control the interpretation and construction of this Amendment, even if under such jurisdiction’s choice of law
or conflict of law analysis, the substantive law of some other jurisdiction would ordinarily apply. 

  








	 	6.	From and after the date hereof, all references in the Plan to the Plan shall be deemed to be references to the Plan as modified by this Amendment. 


* * * * * * 
 As adopted by the Board of
Directors of ATHENE HOLDING LTD., on [                    ], 2014. 

  
 2
#### Willie Lee RICHMOND, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS,* Director, Arizona Department of Corrections; and Roger Crist, Superintendent of the Arizona State Prison, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 86-2382.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 17, 1993.

Before: ALARCON and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and STEPHENS,** District Judge.

*

**Samuel A. Lewis and Roger Crist have been substituted for their respective predecessors in office, James R. Ricketts and Donald Wawrzaszek, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c)(1).

**

 The Honorable Albert Lee Stephens, Senior United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation,

Pursuant to the mandate of the United States Supreme Court certified on December 31, 1992 in *Richmond v. Lewis,*— U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 528, 121 L.Ed.2d 411 (1992), we vacate our opinion at 948 F.2d 1473 (9th Cir.1991), reverse the district court, and remand for further proceedings which are consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Appellant’s motion to issue mandate is denied as moot.
**EXHIBIT 31.A** **CERTIFICATION**     I, Dane E. Whitehead, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of El Paso Exploration & Production Company;     2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this Report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this Report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this Report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Dane    E. Whitehead    Dane E. Whitehead
No. 62557.

#### Carson M. Simon & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 295511-K (A) and 295511-K (B) (Philadelphia).

*437Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked *“A”*consist of baptismal fonts or glass mosaics which would now be classified by the appraiser under paragraph 1774, as amended, *supra,*and that the items marked “B” consist of a main altar reredos the same as that the subject of *Bernardini Studios*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 281, C. D. 1942), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet Security Systems, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
Senior Vice President Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of
the Corporation, certifies that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Corporation.

/s/ RICHARD MACCHIA
--------------------------------------------------
Richard Macchia
Senior Vice President Finance and
Administration and Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2004

                                                                              34
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE McGEE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1603 GEB DAD P

vs.

O. DICKINSON, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed January 5, 2006, this court granted plaintiff an additional thirty

days to complete the documents necessary to effect service on defendants Mangis and Diggins. 

The thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s

order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendants

Mangis and Diggins be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 32 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: February 15, 2006.

DAD:lg

rich1603.fusm

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 32 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2