alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1





KINDER MORGAN, INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906

OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Kinder Morgan, Inc. and will be retained by Kinder Morgan, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|                        |  |                                                         
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------
|Dated:  March 1,
		2007 |  | /s/ Richard D. Kinder                                   
|                        |  | Richard D. Kinder
		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRED GRAVES,,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1279 LKK GGH P

vs.

MIKE KNOWLES, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On March 20, 2006, petitioner filed a motion for the appointment of counsel. 

Because this action is on appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, petitioner’s request

should be addressed to the Ninth Circuit.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to

forward petitioner’s March 20, 2006, motion for the appointment of counsel to the Ninth Circuit.

DATED: 3/31/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

gr1279.cou

Case 2:04-cv-01279-LKK -GGH Document 41 Filed 03/31/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

August 22, 1950

No. 54624.

#### The J L. Hudson Company *v.*United States,

protest 153526-K (Detroit).

*261Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When the case was called for hearing there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. From an examination of papers in the case the court found nothing therein tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
MICHAEL B. BIGELOW

Attorney at Law

State Bar No. 65211

428 J Street, Suite 350

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-0217

Attorney for Defendant

Joshua Phillips

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA PHILLIPS,

Plaintiff,

vs.

SCOTT KENAN, Warden

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIV S-04-1257 GEB GGH P

PROPOSED ORDER

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT

petitioner’s supplemental pleadings shall be due on May 18,

2005.

Dated: 4/27/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

Hon. Gregory G. Hollows

Magistrate Judge 

phil1257.eot04

Case 2:04-cv-01257-GEB-GGH Document 15 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LARRY D. EDWARDS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1164 FCD GGH P

vs.

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 7, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On August

30, 2006, plaintiff was granted an extension of time until September 16, 2006, to file objections.

Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

Case 2:04-cv-01164-FCD-GGH Document 34 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 7, 2006, are adopted in full;

and 

2. Defendant Rohrer’s December 13, 2005, motion for summary judgment is

granted, and judgment is to be entered for defendant.

DATED:September 20, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01164-FCD-GGH Document 34 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 2
# The K larifier TM a c tivated by StormKlear

Keeping water clean in and around jobsites just got easier. How is that possible when today’s standards are tougher than ever you ask? The Klarifier TM activated by StormKlear is the answer!!

Midwest Construction Products ’ Klarifier TM featuring StormKlear’s Dual Biopolymer system incorporates a modified sediment retention bag with preloaded Biopolymer injection system inside. While the common sediment retention bag of the past works well at tak ing some sediment out of the water, they do not get the water to today’s compliancy levels.



## Case study from Bonita Springs May 6 th 

## 2011 Bonita Springs Florida currently has several issues involving keeping their water way s clean. They have been on the

cut ting edge in the use of innovative BMP methods. With many dredge projects shut down d ue to not being able to get their NTUs low enough, and the rainy season on the way, they invited Midwest Construction Produc ts along with their local BMP implementation contractor

, Sweeperman to come up with a solution. Along with the recent introduction of StormKlear to Midwest’s product line the Klarifier TM was designed.

## How does it work?

Contaminated water is pumped from the construction area with a standard jobsite dewatering pump at a rate of 800 to 1000 gallons per minute. The outflow hose of the pump is connected to the Klarifier ’s Activation Injection Port. The Activation Injection Port is part of the Klarifier ’s injection baffle system designed specifically to agitate, dose, and activate the StormKlear Dual Biopolymer system.

## T he treated water is then cast through a specia lized baffle system that helps agitate the water. The water is then forced through a geofilter envelope where the sediment is then contained within the specialized sediment retention bag.

As the bag fills, clean treated water is then forced out of the b ag returning to the contaminated area. The picture below

shows a Bonita Springs city official filling a sample bottle of water coming out of the bag.



## How did we measure success?Background NTU numbers on this project were around 5. Water at the inta ke measured 162 the first test and 187 the
second test taken 10 minutes later . After 2 minutes of running, water measured 43. After 10 minutes of running, water measured 9. After 20 minutes of running water was an astounding 3.2 NTUs!! We came in 1 unde r base, SUCCESS!!

Actual numbers on all tests and a testimonial on how they thought it worked will be provided by Bonita Springs next
week.

This particular Klarifier TM is a 7.5’x15’ bag made from Midwest Construction Products Geoforce Non Woven geotextile with 300 grams of DBP

- 2100 and 300 grams StormKlear Gelfloc pre

- sewn pouches inside our polyester coated non

permeable activation injection system. The Klarifier TM can be made and preloaded to job specific variables! More information, Specifications, and test data to follow.

www.midwestconstruct.com www.ipafes.com www.gabionbaskets.net
Exhibit
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Commission on February 12, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Zuo Sheng Yu, Chief
      Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                February 12, 2007/s/
                Zuo Sheng YuBy:
                Zuo Sheng YuTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer and
                President
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**





**As
      Adopted Pursuant To**





**Section
      906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





I,
      Samuel
      F. Occhipinti, Chief Financial Officer of Solomon Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





• 
      the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
      date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





• the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.








/s/
      Samuel F. Occhipinti


Samuel
      F.
      Occhipinti


Chief
      Financial Officer


(principal
      financial and accounting officer)


August
      20, 2007
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10(iii)(A)(4) 


Amendments to Executive Change of Control Agreement
WHEREAS, Christopher Carroll (the “Executive”) and The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (“Interpublic,” Interpublic and its subsidiaries being referred to herein as the “Company”) are parties to an Executive Change of Control Agreement dated as of May 27, 2010 and amended on August 29, 2013 (the “Agreement”); and
WHEREAS, Section 5.1 of the Agreement states that the Agreement will expire as of September 1, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company wish to extend the Agreement for another three years;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Agreement is hereby amended, effective as of September 1, 2016, as follows:
		
	1.
	Incorporation by Reference.  All provisions of the Agreement are hereby incorporated herein by reference and shall remain in full force and effect except to the extent that such provisions are expressly modified by the provisions of this Amendment.  Words and phrases used in this Amendment shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement unless the context clearly indicates that a different meaning is intended.




		
	2.
	Extension.  Section 5.1(a)(i) of the Agreement is amended by replacing the phrase “September 1, 2016” with “September 1, 2019”.




*                       *                       *
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Interpublic, by its duly authorized officer, and Executive have caused this Amendment to the Agreement to be executed.
 	
				
	 
	The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc.
	 
	Executive

	 
	 
	 
	 

	BY:
	/s/ Andrew Bonzani
	 
	/s/ Christopher Carroll

	 
	Andrew Bonzani
	 
	Christopher Carroll

	 
	SVP, General Counsel & Secretary
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	DATE:  October 26, 2016
	 
	DATE:  October 26, 2016
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet Security Systems, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, the Senior Vice President Finance and Administration and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certifies that:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  RAGHAVAN RAJAJI                        |   |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|
| Raghavan  Rajaji                            |
| Senior  Vice President Finance and          |
| Administration  and Chief Financial Officer |
|                                        |
| May  5, 2006                                |

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
EXCHANGE ACT RULE 15d-14(b) AND
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

          In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Bliss
Essentials Corp. ("Registrant") for the period ending September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Thomas Gelfand, Chief Executive Officer and President of
Registrant, certify, to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule
15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Registrant.

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Bliss Essentials
Corp. and will be retained by Bliss Essentials Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date:  November 12, 2004             /s/ Thomas Gelfand
                                     ----------------------------------
                                     Chief Executive Officer of
                                     Bliss Essentials Corp., Registrant
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STANLEY GREEN, No. CIV S-04-1835-MCE-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

JAMES YATES, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel and in forma

pauperis, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending

before the court is respondents’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 28), filed on February 6, 2006. 

Respondents’ motion is based on the recent death of petitioner, which has been established to the

court through documents attached to the motion. The death of the petitioner renders a habeas

action moot. See Dove v. United States, 423 U.S. 325 (1976) (per curiam) (dismissing certiorari

petition because petitioner had died). Therefore, dismissal is appropriate.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that this petition be

dismissed.

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01835-MCE -CMK Document 29 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive

the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 6, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01835-MCE -CMK Document 29 Filed 04/07/06 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4530 

To authorize an exception to the restriction on construction of Coast Guard 

vessels in foreign shipyards for certain construction in shipyards in 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 13, 2024 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To authorize an exception to the restriction on construction 

of Coast Guard vessels in foreign shipyards for certain 

construction in shipyards in North Atlantic Treaty Organization countries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Coast Guard 

5 Readiness Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4530 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO RESTRICTION ON CONSTRUCTION 

2 OF COAST GUARD VESSELS IN FOREIGN SHIP3 YARDS FOR CERTAIN CONSTRUCTION IN 

4 SHIPYARDS IN NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY OR5 GANIZATION MEMBER COUNTRIES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1151 of title 14, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘subsection 

9 (b)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsections (b) and (c)’’; and 

10 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub11 section: 

12 ‘‘(c)(1) Subsection (a) shall not apply with respect 

13 to construction otherwise covered by that subsection if— 

14 ‘‘(A) the foreign shipyard concerned is located 

15 in— 

16 ‘‘(i) a North Atlantic Treaty Organization 

17 member country; or 

18 ‘‘(ii) a country in the Indo-Pacific region 

19 that is party to a mutual defense treaty with 

20 United States; and 

21 ‘‘(B) the cost of the construction concerned is 

22 less than the cost would be if such construction oc23 curred in a domestic shipyard. 

24 ‘‘(2) Before the construction of a Coast Guard vessel, 

25 or a major component of the hull or superstructure of a 

26 Coast Guard vessel, may commence at a foreign shipyard 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4530 IS

1 under this subsection, the Commandant shall submit to 

2 Congress a certification that the foreign shipyard is not 

3 owned or operated by a Chinese company or a multi4 national company domiciled in the People’s Republic of 

5 China.’’. 

6 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 8679(a) of 

7 title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘and 

8 section 1151(c) of title 14’’ after ‘‘in subsection (b)’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 57292.

protest 196266-K (New York).

#### The Garfel Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0094 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0094

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 March 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners (COM(2005)0593 - C6-0039/2006 - 2005/0242(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 027 E , 31/01/2008 P. 0166 - 0166 *

P6_TA(2007)0094

Civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 March 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the civil liability and financial guarantees of shipowners (COM(2005)0593 — C6-0039/2006 — 2005/0242(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2005)0593) [1],

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Article 80(2) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0039/2006),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Transport and Tourism and the opinion of the Committee on Legal Affairs (A6-0055/2007),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and Commission.

[1] Not yet published in OJ.

--------------------------------------------------
February 9, 1950

No. 54043.

#### Tice & Lynch *v.*United States,

protest 135206-K.

C. D. 1200. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
bicx_ex102.htm

  EXHIBIT 10.2
 
    	 
	1

	

	 


  

	 
	2

	

	 


 

	 
	3

	

	 


 

	 
	4

	

	 


 

	 
	5

	

	 


 

	 
	6

	

	 


 

	 
	7

	

	 


  
 
  
 
	 
	8

	

	 


 

	 
	9

	

	 


 

	 
	10

	

	 


 

 
	11
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.7




    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.
(the "Issuer") on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James A. Yost, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Issuer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:

    1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Issuer.


/s/ James A. Yost
-------------------------------

James A. Yost
Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer
June 16, 2003


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Issuer for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.