alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4473 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4473

 To limit the definition of commercial in title 9, United States Code.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2024

Mr. Blumenthal introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To limit the definition of commercial in title 9, United States Code.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGREEMENT OR AWARD FALLING UNDER THE CONVENTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 202 of title 9, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by adding ``as modified by section 1 of this title,'' 
        after ``title,''; and
            (2) by adding after the period at the end of the third 
        sentence the following: ``The entirety of section 1 of this 
        title, including all of the exemptions listed in section 1, 
        shall apply to this chapter as if specifically set forth 
        herein.''.
    (b) Intent of Congress.--It is the intent of Congress that the 
definition of commercial in section 202 of title 9, United States Code, 
be limited by limiting the relationships described in section 2 of that 
title to those as modified by section 1 of that title, and 
incorporating the entirety of such section 1, including all of the 
exemptions in that section, into section 202 of that title.
    (c) Retroactive Effect.--This Act shall apply to any action or 
proceeding that is pending on the date of enactment of this Act and any 
action or proceeding initiated on or after such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

May 31, 1962

No. 66819.

#### G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/3753, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of G. *Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2 - Certification

                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                   Sarbanes -
                                Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of American  Construction  Company (the
"Company"),  on Form 10-QSB for the quarter  ended  September  30, 2004 as filed
with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  ("SEC") on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned  officer of the Company  certifies,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:


     i.   the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     ii.  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the  Company and will be  furnished  to the SEC or its staff
upon request.

 /s/ John Chen
-----------------------

John Chen
Chief Financial officer
November 12, 2004





This Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is not "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by
applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                            11,831
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            3,351
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              3,259
<EQUITIES>                                         737
<MORTGAGE>                                       2,543
<REAL-ESTATE>                                      133
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  19,536
<CASH>                                              62
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,576
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                           2,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,446
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 18,888
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 53
<POLICY-OTHER>                                     174
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              329
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                  1,174
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              300
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           129
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,624
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,446
<PREMIUMS>                                         903
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                              1,272
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                 101
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     285
<BENEFITS>                                       1,208
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    726
<INCOME-TAX>                                       256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                470
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       470
<EPS-BASIC>                                       4.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.42
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>                                           
                                                Exhibit 23-a
                                                       


            OPINION AND CONSENT OF COUNSEL
                           


As Senior Vice President-Corporate Services, Corporate
Secretary and Chief Legal Officer of Kansas City Power
& Light Company, I have reviewed the statements as to
matters of law and legal conclusions in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 1996, and consent to the incorporation by reference
of such statements in the Company's previously-filed
Form S-3 Registration Statements (Registration No. 33-
51799 and Registration No. 333-17285) and Form S-8
Registration Statements (Registration No. 33-45618 and
Registration No. 33-58917).




                                /s/ Jeanie Sell Latz
                                    Jeanie Sell Latz

Kansas City, Missouri
March  17, 1997
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER N

. GLASGOW,

Petitioner

- Appellant,

v.

CLARK E. DUCART, Warden,

Respondent

- Appellee. No. 19

- 55606

D.C. No. 2:14

- cv

- 09606

- SVW

FFM

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 11, 2019 **

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Christopher N. Glasgow appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Reviewing de novo, see Smith v.

Rya n , 823 F.3d 1270, 1278 (9th Cir. 2016), we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 16 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 55606

Glasgow contends that there was insufficient evidence to support one of his

convictions for transportation and sale of cocaine base. Viewed in the light most

favorable to the prosecution, the evidence un derlying this count could enable a

rational trier of fact to find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable

doubt. See Jones v. Wood , 207 F.3d 557, 563 (9th Cir. 2000). The state court’s

rejection of this claim, therefore, was neither contr ary to, nor an unreasonable

application of, Jackson v. Virginia , 443 U.S. 307 (1979). S ee 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254(d)(1)

.

The motion to expand the certificate of appealability is denied. See Hiivala

v. Wood , 195 F.3d 1098, 1104

- 05 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10215-10216]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4043]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisition of Shares of Bank or 
Bank Holding Companies

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec. [thinsp]225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire a bank or bank holding company. 
The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth 
in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal

[[Page 10216]]

Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the office of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 22, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Mitchell J. Bennett, Falls of the Rough, Kentucky 
(individually), and the Bennett Family Control Group, to retain Farmers 
Bancshares, Inc., Hardinsburg, Kentucky, and thereby indirectly acquire 
The Farmers Bank, Hardinsburg, Kentucky, and Leitchfield Deposit Bank & 
Trust Company, Leitchfield, Kentucky. The Control Group consists of 
Mitchell J. Bennett, Mitchell Bennett, Pam Bennett, and Mason Bennett, 
all of the Falls of the Rough, Kentucky; Charles D. Bennett, Jeanette 
Bennett, and Annette Martin, all of Hardinsburg, Kentucky; David C. 
Bennett, Maria L. Bennett, Roark Wilson, Sienna Wilson, and the C & J 
Bennett Family Limited Partnership, all of Leitchfield, Kentucky; 
Matthew Burden, and Zander Burden, both of Atlanta, Georgia; Rebecca 
Bennett, Bowling Green, Kentucky, and Sarah Bennett, Gardner, Colorado.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (David Tatum, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303:
    2. United Americas Bankshares, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, (after-the-
fact) change in control notice filed by Mr. Salvador Diaz-Verson, 
Sarasota, Florida, to retain shares of United Americas Bankshares, 
Inc., and indirectly acquire United Americas Bank, National 
Association, both of Atlanta, Georgia.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 2, 2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-4043 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
Exhibit 10.27.3.3

Loan Modification

This Loan Modification is executed this 10th day of January, 2011, to be effective on the 3rdday of January, 2011 (the Effective Date) by and among ARTIC MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, a corporation
incorporated under the laws of Panama (Artic), the address for which, for purposes hereof, is Attn: Matthias Eckenstein Solothurnerstrasse 94, CH-4008, Basel, Switzerland, Prime Offshore L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company (the
Borrower) and PrimeEnergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and amends that certain Amended and Restated Loan Modification dated July 21, 2010 effective on the 30 day of June, 2009 by and among parties hereto (the
Agreement).

1. On January 19, 2011 Borrower shall pay Artic $4,000,000 after which the outstanding principal balance on the
Artic loan will be $16,000,000.

2. Item 3 (iii) of the Agreement will be amended as follows:

(iii) if by June 30 of each calendar year on which shares of the common stock of PrimeEnergy Corporation may be traded on the
exchange on which shares of the common stock of PrimeEnergy Corporation are then listed, commencing with June 30, 2012, the Artic loan has not been paid in full and the commitment of Artic to make further advances to the Borrower terminated, as
additional consideration for the Artic loan, PrimeEnergy Corporation will, on or as soon as practicable after each such date, issue to Artic a number of shares (rounded upward, if necessary, to avoid the issuance of any fractional share) of its
common stock equal to the quotient of (a) five percent (5%) of the principal balance of the Artic loan at each relevant date divided by (b) the closing price for shares of the common stock of PrimeEnergy Corporation at each such date
on the exchange on which shares of the common stock of PrimeEnergy Corporation are then listed.

This Loan Modification is to be governed by
the laws of the State of New York.



|                              |  |                        
|----------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|ARTIC MANAGEMENT CORPORATION 
|                              | 
|By:                           |  | /s/ Matthias Eckenstein
|Matthias Eckenstein
President



|                                            |  |                        
|------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|PRIME OFFSHORE L.L.C.                      
|                                            | 
|By:                                         |  | /s/ Beverly A. Cummings
|Beverly A. Cummings
Chief Executive Officer



|                                               |  |                           
|---------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------
|PRIMEENERGY CORPORATION                       
|                                               | 
|By:                                            |  | /s/ Charles E. Drimal, Jr.
|Charles E. Drimal, Jr. Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                       ----------------------------------




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectuses
constituting part of these Registration Statements on Form S-8 pertaining to the
1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-28799), 1997 Non-employee Directors
Stock Plan (No. 333-24439), Long-term Performance Based Incentive Plan (No.
333-24441) and the 1997 Employee Incentive Stock Plan (No. 333-24437) and on
Form S-3 pertaining to Debt Securities; Preferred Stock; Common Stock; Warrants
to Purchase Debt Securities, Preferred Stock and Common Stock; Stock Purchase
Contracts; and Stock Purchase Units (No. 333-31619) of SunAmerica Inc. of our
report dated November 9, 1998 appearing on page F-2 of SunAmerica Inc.'s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1998. We also consent to
the incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial Statement
Schedules, which appears on page S-2 of this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
December 18, 1998
No. 61840.

#### L. H. Graves *v.*United States,

protests 245047-K, etc. (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4351 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 428
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4351

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize certain poison 
                           control programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 15, 2024

 Mrs. Murray (for herself, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Lujan, and Mr. Romney) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

                             June 18, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Sanders, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize certain poison 
                           control programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Poison Control Centers 
Reauthorization Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF POISON CONTROL PROGRAMS.

    (a) National Toll-Free Number and Other Communication 
Capabilities.--Section 1271(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 300d-71(c)) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2020 through 
2024'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2025 through 2029''.
    (b) Promoting Poison Control Center Utilization.--Section 1272(c) 
of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-72(c)) is amended by 
striking ``fiscal years 2020 through 2024'' and inserting ``fiscal 
years 2025 through 2029''.
    (c) Poison Control Center Grant Program.--Section 1273(g) of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300d-73(g)) is amended by striking 
``fiscal years 2020 through 2024'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2025 
through 2029''.
                                                       Calendar No. 428

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4351

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize certain poison 
                           control programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 18, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Romeo Torres GARALDE; Marissa Villon Garalde; Anna Francisca Garalde; Romeo Villon Garalde, Jr., Petitioners, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 99-71320.

INS Nos. [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ], [ AXX-XXX-XXX ].

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 21, 2001.

*544Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Romeo Torres Garalde, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation.1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a),2 and we deny the petition.

We review for substantial evidence the BIA’s determination that Garalde has failed to establish asylum eligibility because he has failed to demonstrate persecution or well-founded fear thereof on account of membership in a particular social group, political opinion, or any other prohibited ground. *Singh v. INS,*134 F.3d 962, 966 (9th Cir.1998). To reverse the BIA’s decision we must find that the evidence not only supports a contrary conclusion, but compels it. *Id.*

We deny Gar aide’s petition for review because the evidence does not compel the conclusion that Gar aide’s alleged persecutors were or would be motivated by his real or imputed political opinions or by his membership in a particular social group. *See INS v. Elias-Zacarias,*502 U.S. 478, 482, 112 S.Ct. 812, 117 L.Ed.2d 38 (1992). Because the evidence does not compel a finding of eligibility for asylum, it necessarily does not compel a finding that Gar-alde has satisfied the more stringent standard for withholding of deportation. *See Singh,*134 F.3d at 971.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Garalde is the primary applicant for asylum; the claims of his wife and two children are derivative of his application.

2

. The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 ("IIRIRA”), Pub. L. No. 104-208, 110 Stat. 3009 (Sept. 30, 1996), replaced this section with a new judicial review provision codified at 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Under IIRIRA’s transitional rules, however, this new provision does not apply to proceedings initiated prior to April 1, 1997 that result in a final deportation order entered after October 30, 1996. We therefore continue to exercise jurisdiction over Garalde's action under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a). IIRIRA § 309(c)(1); *Kalaw v. INS,*133 F.3d 1147, 1150-51 (9th Cir.1997).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEMIAN TREVOR O’KEEFE,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-04-1695 WBS GGH PS

vs.

EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On January 14, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. No objections were

filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-01695-GGH Document 67 Filed 02/26/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 14, 2010, are ADOPTED;

and

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (docket no. 57) is denied.

DATED: February 26, 2010

 

okee1695.CJRA

Case 2:04-cv-01695-GGH Document 67 Filed 02/26/10 Page 2 of 2