alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Matthew Rodriquez 

Secretary for 

Environmental Protection 

October 21 , 2014 

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

Regional Administrator 

Region 9 

Air Resources Board 

Mary D. Nichols, Chairman 

1001 I Street • P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95812 • www.arb.ca.gov 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

Governor 

The Air Resources Board (ARB) is submitting to the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (U.S. EPA) the 2014 Update to the Air Quality Maintenance Plan and 

Redesignation Request for the Town of Mammoth Lakes (Maintenance Plan/ 

Redesignation Request). The Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (District) 

adopted the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request on May 5, 2014, as a revision to 

the California State Implementation Plan (SIP), and transmitted it to ARB on 

May 22, 2014. 

During the District's 30-day notice, the transportation conformity budgets were updated 

to encompass the entire non-attainment area. To satisfy the public noticing 

requirement, ARB noticed the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request for public 

comment 30 days prior to its September 18, 2014, public hearing to approve the 

Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request. ARB received no public comments on the 

Maintenance Plan/Redesignation Request either prior to or during the public hearing. 

This submittal includes two paper copies and one electronic media copy of the SIP 

revision materials identified as follows: 

I. The District transmittal package, including public notice, public hearing, and 

District Board adoption documentation. 

II. ARB public notice and transcript of ARB's public meeting. 

Ill. ARB Board Resolution 14-27 approving the Maintenance Plan/Redesignation 

Request as a proposed revision to California's State Implementation Plan. 

IV. SIP Submittal Checklist. 

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. 

For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.gov. 

California Environmental Protection Agency 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

October21, 2014 

Page 2 

ARB is committed to working with U.S. EPA staff to provide any additional clarifying 

information needed. If you have any questions, please call Ms. Lynn Terry, Deputy 

Executive Officer, at (916) 322-2739, or Mr. Kurt Karperos, Chief, Air Quality Planning 

and Science Division, at (916) 445-5610. 

Sincerely, 

(-~~'511 

RJ~hard M._c_i!f;fJ 

Executive Officer 

Enclosures 

cc: (with Board Resolution 14-27 only) 

Dr. Deborah Jordan, Director 

Region 9, Air Division 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Mr. Theodore D. Schade 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District 

157 Short Street 

Bishop, California 93514-6109 

Ms. Lynn Terry 

Deputy Executive Officer 

Air Resources Board 

Ms. Sylvia Vanderspek, Chief 

Air Quality Planning Branch
[Exhibit 32.2]

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Demco Industries, Inc.
(the "Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul Hines, Chief Financial Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 907 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated: April 12, 2005

                               /s/ Paul Hines
                               -----------------------------------
                               Paul Hines, Chief Financial Officer
                               Demco Industries, Inc.
(Reap. Dec. 10739)

#### United States *v.*W. R. Zanes & Co.

Entry No. 15322-H.

(Decided April 28, 1964)

*John*TV. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *(Sheila N. Ziff,*trial attorney), for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Wilson, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of certain sewing machine cabinets, exported from Norway, tbe only item in question being that of ocean freight.

Tbe record herein discloses that tbe merchandise was appraised at invoiced units “less ocean freight of $1051.46.” It appears that the stated amount for ocean freight was in error, the correct amount of ocean freight being $51.46 (plaintiff’s exhibit 1).

Accordingly, I find and hold that the proper value of the involved merchandise is the same as that at which the merchandise was appraised, with the exception that the amount of ocean freight properly deductible from the appraised value is $51.46 as agreed to by the parties herein.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4492 

To improve the transparency of Amtrak operations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 11, 2024 

Mrs. FISCHER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To improve the transparency of Amtrak operations, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Amtrak Transparency 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETINGS. 

7 Section 24302 of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)(6), by striking ‘‘in an open 

10 meeting’’; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4492 IS

1 (2) by amending subsection (e) to read as fol2 lows: 

3 ‘‘(e) MEETINGS.— 

4 ‘‘(1) QUORUM.—A majority of the members 

5 serving on the Board who are eligible to vote shall 

6 constitute a quorum for doing business. 

7 ‘‘(2) NOTICE; OPEN MEETINGS.— 

8 ‘‘(A) NOTICE.—Not later than 30 days be9 fore convening any meeting of the Board, the 

10 Board shall post, on a publicly accessible 

11 website, an announcement of the meeting that 

12 includes the anticipated agenda for the meeting. 

13 ‘‘(B) OPEN MEETINGS.—All meetings of 

14 the Board shall comply with the requirements 

15 set forth in section 552b of title 5. 

16 ‘‘(3) ANNUAL MEETING WITH STATES.—Not 

17 less frequently than annually, the Board shall con18 vene a meeting to which the head of the Department 

19 of Transportation of each State traversed by a long20 distance route or State-supported route, or the des21 ignee of such State official, shall be invited to par22 ticipate.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4492 IS

1 SEC. 3. DISCRETIONARY BONUS DISCLOSURE REQUIRE2 MENT. 

3 Section 24303(b) of title 49, United States Code, is 

4 amended by striking ‘‘The preceding sentence’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘Amtrak shall publicly disclose the amount of each 

6 discretionary bonus paid to any officer or non-bargaining 

7 unit employee. The 2 preceding sentences’’. 

8 SEC. 4. DISCLOSURE OF VENDOR AGREEMENTS. 

9 Section 24315(h) of title 49, United States Code, is 

10 amended by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Upon re11 quest, Amtrak shall disclose to a State or the State-Am12 trak Intercity Passenger Rail Committee, any vendor 

13 agreement valued at not less than $250,000 for services 

14 procured to implement a service on a State-supported 

15 route.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Keane, Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John J. Leahy Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|Date: March 15, 2004 |  | /s/JOHN J. LEAHYJohn J. Leahy
Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
Exhibit 32.2

                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

                             As Adopted Pursuant To

                  Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Samuel F. Occhipinti,  Chief Financial Officer of Solomon Technologies,  Inc.
(the "Company"),  certify,  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

o    the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June
     30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date
     hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

o    the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the Company
     for the periods presented therein.


/s/ Samuel F. Occhipinti
------------------------
Samuel F. Occhipinti
Chief Financial Officer
October 20, 2004



                                      -20-
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.A CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2005, of
El Paso Production Holding Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lisa A. Stewart, President and Chief Executive
Officer, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Lisa A. StewartLisa A. StewartPresident(Principal Executive Officer)November 7, 2005
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Production Holding Company and will be retained by El Paso Production Holding Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L
- _,) ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22-0435
STATE OF MONTANA, 

### AUG 2 3 2022

Plaintiffand Appellee, v. JAY PAGELER,

Defendant and Appellant. Bowen UreenwoocI Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Jay Pageler has filed a Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal from his April 2021 judgment and sentence. On April 13, 2021, the Eighteenth Judicial District Court, Gallatin County, sentenced Pageler to the Department ofCorrections for a fifteen-year, suspended term, for felony robbery. Pageler also received a concurrent, suspended term oftwelve months in jail formisdemeanor fleeingoreludingapeaceofficer. TheDistrict Court awardedPageler 223 daysofcredit fortime served, andthecourt designated him a violent offender. Pageler is not incarcerated, and is serving his probationary term in Idaho. Pageler states only that he has obtained two new mental health evaluations, diagnosing him with autism and severe post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), but offers no connection ofthis to, or other explanation for, the failure to file a notice ofappeal. M. R. App. P. 4(6) allows this Court to grant an out-of-time appeal "[i]n the infrequent harsh case and under extraordinary circumstances amounting to a gross miscarriage of justice[.]" "Extraordinary circumstances do not include mere mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect." M. R. App. P. 4(6). We concludePageler has not demonstrated extraordinary circumstances, amounting to a gross miscarriage ofjustice, that would entitle him to an out-of-time appeal under the Rules ofAppellate Procedure. Accordingly, 08/23/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0435IT IS ORDERED that Pageler's Petition for an Out-of-Time Appeal is DENIED and

DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to Bjorn E. Boyer, Gallatin County Deputy Attorney: to Austin Knudsen. Attorney General, along with a copy of Pageler's Petition; and to Jav Pageler personally. DATED this

—day ofAugust, 2022.

Justices
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Irwin Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), I,
William I. Miller, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: March 17, 2003               /s/ William I. Miller
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 William I. Miller
                                 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
No. 53557.

protest 109712-K (Galveston).

#### P. M. Wimberly *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest..

Cole, J., dissented on jurisdictional grounds, citing *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 158, C. D. 1175), *Fuchs Shoe Corp.*v. *United States*(id. 338, Abstract 53250), and *W. R. Zanes & Co.*v. *United States*(id. 339, Abstract 53251).
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Clearant, Inc. (the Company) for the
quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Donald J. Lewis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ DONALD J. LEWIS
    
    May 16, 2005Donald J. Lewis
    
    DateChief Executive Officer
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX) 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

September 16, 2014

J udge James E. Klager

County Court At Law #4

Nueces County Courthouse

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Mark Skurka

District Attorney

901 Leopard Street, Room 205

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. David Jakubowski

Asst. District Attorney

901 Leopard Street, Room 206

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Patsy Perez

District Clerk

901 Leopard St., Suite 313

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Douglas K. Norman

Assistant District Attorney

901 Leopard, Room 206

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Hon. Travis W. Berry

Attorney at Law

P.O. Box 6333

Corpus Christi, TX 78466

- 6333

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 13

- 00358

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. 13

- 714

- 4

Style: THE STATE OF TEXAS v. BONNIE DOWNS

Dear Sir/Madam :

Enclosed please find copy of an order issued by this Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER: ch

Enc.
118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 41 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the READ Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 41 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘READ Act Reauthor3 ization Act of 2023’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

5 Section 4(a) of the Reinforcing Education Account6 ability in Development Act (division A of Public Law 115– 

7 56; 22 U.S.C. 2151c note) is amended by striking ‘‘during 

8 the following five fiscal years’’ and inserting ‘‘during the 

9 following ten fiscal years’’. 

Passed the Senate November 6, 2023. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 41 

AN ACT 

To reauthorize the READ Act.
November 18, 1946

No. 51419.

Suit 4497.

#### *American Mail Line, Ltd.*v. *United States,*

C. D. 885 dismissed by stipulation on September 30, 1946.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RYDEX, LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY,

MAZDA MOTOR OF AMERICA, INC.

(DOING BUSINESS AS MAZDA NORTH AMERICAN 

OPERATIONS),

Defendants-Cross Appellants

TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant

AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., 

SUBARU OF AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants

______________________ 

2013-1462, 2013-1463

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Texas in No. 11-CV-0122, Judge 

Vanessa D. Gilmore.
 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

STAMATIOS STAMOULIS, Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLC, 

Wilmington, DE, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

DOMINIC FRANCIS PERELLA, Hogan Lovells US LLP, 

Washington, DC, argued for defendant-cross appellants. 

Also represented by JASON R. MUDD, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS. JEFFREY SCOTT PATTERSON, Hartline 

Dacus Barger Dreyer LLP, Dallas, TX, for defendant-cross 

appellant Nissan North America, Inc. ERIC W.

SCHWEIBENZ, Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, for plaintiff-cross appellant 

Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. Also represented by 

RICHARD D. KELLY, ROBERT CARTER MATTSON. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and 

O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 18, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
No. 50448.

#### Protest 936420-G of Winograd Bros., Inc. (New York).

*258Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the goatskins are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros,*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE McGEE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1603 GEB DAD P

vs.

O. DICKINSON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff seeks

relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On August 22, 2005, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the

second amended complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendants Mangis and Diggins

was returned unserved because the California Department of Corrections was unable to locate the

defendants. Plaintiff must provide additional information to serve these defendants. Plaintiff

shall promptly seek such information through discovery, the California Public Records Act,

Calif. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means available to plaintiff. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff two USM-285 forms,

along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the June 20, 2005 second amended complaint;

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 19 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. A completed USM-285 form for defendant Mangis and a completed

USM-285 form for defendant Diggins; 

b. Three copies of the endorsed second amended complaint filed June 20,

2005; and

c. One completed summons form (if not previously provided) 

or show good cause why he cannot provide such information.

DATED: October 26, 2005.

DAD:bb/4

rich1603.8e 

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 19 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEWAYNE McGEE RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1603 GEB DAD P

vs.

O. DICKINSON, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court’s

order filed :

 One completed summons form

 Two completed USM-285 forms

 Three copies of the June 20, 2005 

 Second Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-01603-GEB-DAD Document 19 Filed 10/27/05 Page 3 of 3