alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         995,810
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,233,562
<ALLOWANCES>                                   189,000
<INVENTORY>                                    473,771
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,564,281
<PP&E>                                       8,930,976
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,969,514
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,593,120
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,169,377
<BONDS>                                      8,814,969
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       577,301
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,031,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,593,120
<SALES>                                     11,051,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,051,227
<CGS>                                        4,718,505
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,338,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (126,666)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,044,063
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                794,834
<INCOME-TAX>                                    95,400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            699,434
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   699,434
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES JIMINEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1532 LKK JFM P

vs.

E. TOWNSELL, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Pursuant to notice, this matter came on for hearing on June 2, 2005 for

consideration of dismissal for lack of prosecution. Plaintiff did not appear at the hearing. Eric

Turner, Esq., appeared as counsel for defendants. On April 22, 2005, plaintiff was ordered to

show cause in person and in writing why this matter should not be dismissed for lack of

prosecution. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to submit a declaration as required by the April

22, 2005 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 

The order to show cause followed plaintiff’s failure to appear at an April 14, 2005

hearing on defendants’ motions to compel production of documents, supplemental responses to

interrogatories, and plaintiff’s deposition, or to respond in any way to said motions. As noted

above, plaintiff did not appear at the show cause hearing, nor did he file the required declaration

or respond in any way to the court’s April 22, 2005 show cause order. This file reflects no

Case 2:04-cv-01532-LKK -JFM Document 50 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

activity by plaintiff for four months. Plaintiff submitted no reasons why this matter should not be

dismissed, did not provide an explanation for lack of activity in this case and described no plans

to prepare this case for trial.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this

action be dismissed for lack of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file

written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be

captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the

objections shall be served and filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties

are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal

the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 21, 2005.

12

jimi1532.55

Case 2:04-cv-01532-LKK -JFM Document 50 Filed 06/22/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jaclyn, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report"), the
undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: September 28, 2006           /s/ ROBERT CHESTNOV
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Robert Chestnov, President
                                    (Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: September 28, 2006           /s/ ANTHONY CHRISTON
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Anthony Christon,
                                    Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Jaclyn, Inc. and will be retained by Jaclyn, Inc. and forwarded
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9981]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3864]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste; Meeting on Planning and 
Procedures; Notice of Meeting

    The Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) will hold a Planning 
and Procedures meeting on March 20, 2007, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville 
Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The entire meeting will be open to public 
attendance, with the exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant 
to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel 
matters that relate solely to internal personnel rules and practices of 
ACNW, and information the release of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
    The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

Tuesday, March 20, 2007--8:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m.

    The Committee will discuss proposed ACNW activities and related 
matters. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze 
relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and 
actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.
    Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or 
written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. 
Antonio F. Dias (Telephone: 301/415-6805) between 8:15 a.m. and 5 p.m. 
(ET) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate 
arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only 
during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public.
    Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by 
contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8:15 a.m. and 5 p.m. 
(ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the 
above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting 
to be advised of any potential changes in the agenda.

    Dated: February 27, 2007.
Antonio F. Dias,
Acting Branch Chief, ACNW.
 [FR Doc. E7-3864 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Docket No. RP00-632-022] 

Take notice that on February 20, 2007, Dominion Transmission, Inc. (DTI) tendered for filing its addendum to the 2006 informational fuel report filed with the Commission on June 30, 2006 in Docket No. RP00-632-021. 

Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the proceeding. 

                    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov.*                     Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.                 

                    This filing is accessible on-line at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*, using the “eLibrary” link and is available for review in the Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an “eSubscription” link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov*, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.                           ( print page 10510)    

*Comment Date:*                     5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 9, 2007.                 

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-4119 Filed 3-7-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

34 36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/16 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.54 N 76.62 WMeters AGL
Annual Commercial Landing Statistics 

NOAA Fisheries | Office of Science &Technology | Fisheries Statistics

Commercial Fisheries 

Contact Us | Site Map 

To summarize landings for an individual species use 

(click on) the 

 

to look up and enter the name in the SPECIES field. We 

recommend you look-up and use the NMFS common 

names because the query depends on matching the name 

in the SPECIES field with the species name in a master 

coding table. If there isn't an exact match the executed 

query will say that there were "no matching records." To 

summarize landings of all species, enter the phrase ALL 

SPECIES COMBINED or ALL SPECIES 

INDIVIDUALLY in the SPECIES field; the first option 

gives you total combined landings while the second 

option indicates total landings for each individual 

species. 

Species Locator

Gray Snapper (Lutjanus griseus)

Photo Credit: Manooch and Raver, ©Copyright

SPECIES: ALL SPECIES COMBINED

YEAR RANGE:

FROM: 

 (Earliest Year) 

TO: (Latest Year) 

2009

2009

Choose the year(s) to begin and end your data summary. If you want data 

for a single year, enter that year (e.g., 1992) in both the FROM and TO 

boxes. A word of caution, landings for the most recent year indicated are 

preliminary and sometimes are highly incomplete. 

GEOGRAPHICAL AREA

STATE/AREA:

All States 

Areas are arranged in geographical order by subregion. For example, the 

option "New England By State" will give you the landings for each of the 

five states listed after the option (Maine to Connecticut). The "New 

England" option will give you the total combined landings of the five 

states. The NMFS "Chesapeake" Region includes bay and oceanic 

landings for Maryland and Virginia. Florida is divided into three areas 

(east coast, west coast, and inland waters) in our surveys. Florida east 

coast and inland water landings are summarized with South Atlantic 

states and Florida west coast landings are summarized when Gulf 

landings are requested. The only way to get total Florida landings 

(west+east+inland waters) is to select the "Florida, State Total" option. 

Commercial landings for Washington, Oregon, California, Hawaii and 

Alaska are listed under the Pacific region. 

OUTPUT FORM:

TABLE 

The summarized data can be viewed in a table format by choosing the 

"Table" option from the OUTPUT FORM; this tabular data with subtotals 

can be printed by choosing the FILE PRINT option from the top menu 

Annual Landings Query Page 1 of 2

http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/commercial/landings/annual_landings.html 7/5/2011
bar. Choose the "ASCII File" option if you want to create a file of these 

data without the subtotals; the data file will not be output to your monitor. 

Submit Query Clear Entries

Photo Credits

All fish pictures, unless otherwise noted, are used with the permission of Charles S. Manooch, III and Duane 

Raver, Jr. These copyrighted pictures are from their book, "Fishermen's Guide: Fishes of the Southeastern 

United States.

This page was last modified August 6, 2007 .

Annual Landings Query Page 2 of 2

http://www.st.nmfs.noaa.gov/st1/commercial/landings/annual_landings.html 7/5/2011
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Robert Elmer Barber,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-1844 MCE PAN P

vs. Order

McGregor W. Scott, et al.,

Respondents.

-oOoJanuary 13, 2006, petitioner requested an extension of time

to file and serve a reply. Good cause appearing, petitioner’s

request is granted and time is extended until 30 days from the

date this order is signed.

So ordered.

Dated: January 19, 2006. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01844-MCE -EFB Document 34 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 1
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

UNPUBLISHED 

November 22, 2016 

v No. 328477 

Wayne Circuit Court 

DEREK JAMES SMITH, LC No. 15-001476-01-FC 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: WILDER, P.J., and CAVANAGH and SERVITTO, JJ. 

SERVITTO, J. (concurring). 

 I concur with the majority’s conclusions regarding defendant’s allegations of error on 

appeal. I write separately, however, to express my extreme shock and disbelief that the trial 

judge in this matter finds it appropriate to adhere to a personal policy of “rewarding” defendants 

who “plead guilty in advance of trial.” While the trial judge stated that her practice was not “to 

punish people for exercising their right to go to trial” the irrefutable and impermissible end result 

is that her policy and practice does exactly that. 

 The right to trial by jury in a criminal felony prosecution is among the most fundamental 

rights provided by our judicial system. See, People v Allen, 466 Mich 86, 90; 643 NW2d 227 

(2002). No price may be exacted, nor a penalty be imposed for exercising a fundamental right. 

People v Snow, 26 Mich App 510, 515; 182 NW2d 820 (1970). To deny concessions to those 

who exercise constitutional rights and grant them to those who waive their rights is to exact a 

price on the exercise of guaranteed rights. This no state may properly do. See United States v 

Jackson, 390 US 570; 88 S Ct 1209; 20 L Ed 2d 138 (1968). When sentencing a defendant, a 

trial court may not consider factors that violate a defendant's constitutional rights. People v 

Godbold, 230 Mich App 508, 512; 585 NW2d 13 (1998)(emphasis added). 

 Moreover, “it is a violation of due process to punish a person for asserting a protected 

statutory or constitutional right.” People v Jones, 252 Mich App 1, 7; 650 NW2d 717 (2002), 

quoting People v Ryan, 451 Mich 30, 35; 545 NW2d 612 (1996). And, “to punish a person 

because he has done what the law plainly allows him to do is a due process violation of the most 

basic sort . . . .” Id. quoting Ryan, 451 Mich at 36. 

 It is not a new tenet of law that a judge may not consider the absence of a plea when 

sentencing a defendant. See, e.g., People v Snow, 26 Mich App 510, 516; 182 NW2d 820 

(1970). A defendant may also not be penalized at sentencing for refusing to admit guilt, People 
-2- 

v Conley, 270 Mich App 301, 315; 715 NW2d 377 (2006), or for exercising his or her right to a 

jury trial. People v Mosko, 190 Mich App 204, 211; 475 NW2d 866 (1991). The trial judge’s 

blatant disregard of years of established case law and her indifference to defendant’s 

constitutional rights, signals a neglect of her duty to sentence a defendant in conformity with the 

law. See, People v Francisco, 474 Mich 82, 91; 711 NW2d 44 (2006). It is unsettling to me to 

know that such a policy that effectively chills the exercise of the fundamental right to a jury trial 

would be exercised by a trial court in this day. 

/s/ Deborah A. Servitto
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4562 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the practice 

of feeding excrement to farm animals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2024 

Mr. BOOKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

prohibit the practice of feeding excrement to farm animals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘NO Stool in Herds’ 

5 Troughs Act’’ or the ‘‘NO SHT Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON INTENTIONAL ADDITION OF EX7 CREMENT TO ANIMAL FOOD. 

8 Section 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 

9 Act (21 U.S.C. 331) is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4562 IS

1 ‘‘(jjj)(1) The manufacture or the introduction or de2 livery for introduction into interstate commerce of an ani3 mal food that contains intentionally-added excrement. 

4 ‘‘(2) For purposes of subparagraph (1), the use of 

5 livestock or poultry manure as crop fertilizer shall not be 

6 considered to be the intentional addition of excrement.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY ROY KEETON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0758 GEB PAN P

vs.

FORSYTHE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file an amended complaint. Good

cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's May 30, 2006 motion for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an 

amended complaint that complies with this court’s April 27, 2006 order.

DATED: June 14, 2006.

/mp:001

keet0758.36

Case 2:04-cv-00758-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 06/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:04-cv-00758-GEB-EFB Document 10 Filed 06/14/06 Page 2 of 2
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Heidi King <hking@omb.eop.gov>, dmancini@omb.eop.gov, Bridgid Curry/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Marta Montoro

Date: 01/22/2010 10:16 PM

Subject:

Clean version of the final NO2 rule

Folks, 

Here is the final package in a clean version. Scott didn't realize he needed to create a redline, so 

he's going to try to do that now. The new language on Regional Administrator authority begins on 

page 132 of the preamble. I thought in the absence of the redline, you could all start with this 

package. Hope this is helpful. 

Lydia
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
             the Report.



                                    /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    John A. Celentano, Jr.
                                    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                    Officer


                                    /s/ Christine R. Piano
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Christine R. Piano
                                    Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                    (principal financial and accounting officer)

February 8, 2006
No. 60052.

#### Antonio Pompeo et al. *v.*United States,

protests 249986-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of superchargers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Antonio Pompeo*(43 C. C. P. A. 9, C. A. D. 602), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.