alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 52007AP0088 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 52007AP0088

**European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 March 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters (COM(2004)0718 - C6-0154/2004 - 2004/0251(COD)) **

*
Official Journal 027 E , 31/01/2008 P. 0129 - 0129 *

P6_TA(2007)0088

Mediation in civil and commercial matters ***I

European Parliament legislative resolution of 29 March 2007 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters (COM(2004)0718 — C6-0154/2004 — 2004/0251(COD))

(Codecision procedure: first reading)

The European Parliament,

- having regard to the Commission proposal to the European Parliament and the Council (COM(2004)0718),

- having regard to Article 251(2) and Articles 61(c) and 67(5) of the EC Treaty, pursuant to which the Commission submitted the proposal to Parliament (C6-0154/2004),

- having regard to Rule 51 of its Rules of Procedure,

- having regard to the report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (A6-0074/2007),

1. Approves the Commission proposal as amended;

2. Calls on the Commission to refer the matter to Parliament again if it intends to amend the proposal substantially or replace it with another text;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council and the Commission.

--------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Katy Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David J. Feldman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ David J. Feldman


David J. Feldman


Chief Executive Officer


March 25, 2010











The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| **NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS**                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
| **University Currents**
University Programs OverviewUniversity Programs SolicitationsUniversity Currents- 2004:  Spring 2004 Issue    **2003:**Fall 2003 Issue2002:
Winter 2002 Issue
; 
Spring 2002 Issue
- 2001:  Summer 2001 Issue    **2000:**Winter 2000 Issue; Summer 2000 Issue; Spring 2000 Issue1999:
Fall 1999 Issue
; 
Late Summer 1999 Issue
; 
Spring 1999 Issue
- 1998:  Fall 1998 Issue             Page Last Updated: 4/9/04**TOP** |
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Memorandum 

DATE: November 3, 2014 

OFFICE OF 

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND 

POLLUTION PREVENTION 

SUBJECT: Transmission of Background Materials and Charge to the Panel for the December 2 

through 5, 2014 Session of the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) Entitled "Integrated 

Bioactivity and Exposure Ranking: A Computational Approach for the Prioritization and 

Screening of Chemicals in the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program" 

TO: 

FROM: 

THRU: 

Fred Jenkins, Ph.D. 

Designated Federal Official 

FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel 

Office of Science Coordination and Policy 

Steven M. Knott, Director 

Exposure Assessment Coordination and Policy Division 

Office of Science Coordination and Policy 

David Dix, Ph.D., Director 

Office of Science Coordination and Policy 

Transmitted with this memo are copies of the EPA white paper, all background documents, and the charge 

to the Panel for the December 2 through 5, 2014 session of the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) 

reviewing the topic: "Integrated Bioactivity and Exposure Ranking: A Computational Approach for the 

Prioritization and Screening of Chemicals in the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program." These 

documents do not contain any information protected by copyright, protected under statute as Confidential 

Business Information (CBI) or protected from disclosure to foreign and multi-national pesticide producers 

under FIFRA Section 1 O(g). The attached documents include the following: 

Document Title Date 

Integrated Bioactivity and Exposure Ranking: A Computational Approach 

for the Prioritization and Screening of Chemicals in the Endocrine Disruptor November 3, 2014 

Screening Program 

December 2014 FIFRA SAP Charge Questions November 3, 2014 

Appendix 1: ER AUC Scores for Reference Chemicals November 3, 2014 

Appendix 2: ER AUC Scores for All Chemicals November 3, 2014 

Appendix 3: Supplementary Data November 3, 2014 

Appendix 4: NICEATM Uterotrophic Database for Guideline Like Studies November 3, 2014 

Appendix 5: Utero trophic Study Design Radar Plots November 3, 2014 

Appendix 6: Detailed Review ofUterotrophic Study - ToxCast Discordance November 3, 2014 

Appendix 7: AR AUC Scores for Reference Chemicals November 3, 2014 

Appendix 8: AR AUC Scores for All Chemicals November 3, 2014
EXHIBIT 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Richard Macchia, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of InternetSecurity Systems, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end ofthe period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.   Date:May 10, 2004 /s/ Richard Macchia   Richard Macchia Senior Vice President Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer
31
No. 50977.

#### Protest 74531-K of Reichard Coulston, Inc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88. C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of invoice 1224 covered by entry 11252 should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector oh the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jonathan M. McKenzie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:February 26, 2016

/s/ Jonathan M. McKenzie

Jonathan M. McKenzie

Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Jon Garfield, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clearant, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant is made known to us by others within the entity, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information;andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 10, 2006 /s/ JON GARFIELD   Jon Garfield   *Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)*   
23
June 29, 2015

Skypics LLC

41 Ingham Hill Road

Old Saybrook, CT 06475

To whom it may concern:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your March 12, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-0631), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Before the Third Division,

August 29, 1945

No. 50440.

#### Protests 106447-K, etc., of Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. (Indianapolis) .

*256Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protests upon the ground that they were not filed in time. An examination of the protests disclosing that they were filed more than 60 days after liquidation as provided by section 504, Tariff Act of 1930, the motion to dismiss was granted.
No. 62571.

#### Gematex Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 312808-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protest was dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                        5
<CIK>                            0001051829
<NAME>                           MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III
       
<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-16-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-25-1998
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                773,196,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                13,530,930
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            786,726,930
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              786,726,930
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        13,530,930
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                 750,000,000
<COMMON>                                     23,196,000
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                786,726,930
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             38,195,891
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              38,195,891
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          38,195,891
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 38,195,891
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0
        


</TABLE>
----

Information procedure — Technical rules

(2006/C 232/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

Directive 98/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical standards and regulations and of rules on Information Society services. (OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37; OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18).

Notifications of draft national technical rules received by the Commission

The Commission draws attention to the judgement delivered on 30 April 1996 in the ‘CIA Security’ case (C-194/94 — ECR I, p. 2201), in which the Court of Justice ruled that Articles 8 and 9 of Directive 98/34/EC (formerly 83/189/EEC) are to be interpreted as meaning that individuals may rely on them before national courts which must decline to apply a national technical regulation which has not been notified in accordance with the Directive.

This judgement confirms the Commission's communication of 1 October 1986 (OJ C 245, 1.10.1986, p. 4).

Accordingly, breach of the obligation to notify renders the technical regulations concerned inapplicable, and consequently unenforceable against individuals.

For more information on the notification procedure, please write to:

Also consult the website: http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/tris/

If you require any further information on these notifications, please contact the national departments listed below:

LIST OF NATIONAL DEPARTMENTS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF DIRECTIVE 98/34/EC

BELGIUM

CZECH REPUBLIC

DENMARK

GERMANY

ESTONIA

GREECE

SPAIN

FRANCE

IRELAND

ITALY

CYPRUS

LATVIA

LITHUANIA

LUXEMBURG

HUNGARY

MALTA

NETHERLANDS

AUSTRIA

POLAND

PORTUGAL

SLOVENIA

SLOVAKIA

FINLAND

SWEDEN

UNITED KINGDOM

EFTA — ESA

TURKEY

----

(1)  Year — registration number — Member State of origin.

(2)  Period during which the draft may not be adopted.

(3)  No standstill period since the Commission accepts the grounds of urgent adoption invoked by the notifying Member State.

(4)  No standstill period since the measure concerns technical specifications or other requirements or rules on services linked to fiscal or financial measures, pursuant to the third indent of the second paragraph of Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34/EC.

(5)  Information procedure closed.

----