alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
11. Statement re computation of per share earnings





Year ended September 30,
2002


Year ended September 30,
2001

Year ended September 30,
2000Net (loss) income in thousands

$
(3,080
)

$
17,392

$
21,045Weighted average shares outstanding


15,686,557



15,724,423


14,698,456Assumed exercise of stock options, weighted average of incremental shares






770,231


1,384,753Assumed purchase of stock under stock purchase plan, weighted average






88,372


84,644Diluted shares  adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions


15,686,557



16,583,026


16,167,853Basic (loss) earnings per share

$
(0.20
)

$
1.11

$
1.43Diluted (loss) earnings per share

$
(0.20
)

$
1.05

$
1.30
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4458 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4458

To reauthorize the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

  Mr. Rounds (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To reauthorize the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Water Supply Program 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF RECLAMATION RURAL WATER SUPPLY ACT OF 2006.

    (a) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 109(a) of the 
Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 2408(a)) is 
amended by striking ``2016'' and inserting ``2032''.
    (b) Termination of Authority.--Section 110 of the Reclamation Rural 
Water Supply Act of 2006 (43 U.S.C. 2409) is amended by striking 
``2016'' and inserting ``2032''.
                                 <all>
```
MICHAEL ALLEN SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5622

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 5, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Lacey Kantor, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         617,520                  54,752
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  556,847                 250,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,542,250               3,268,303
<PP&E>                                         711,415                 680,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                 138,371                 292,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,904,312               9,005,233
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,157,042               4,078,040
<BONDS>                                      2,614,448               1,153,045
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         7,287                   9,462
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,098,535               3,714,864
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,904,312               9,005,233
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,984,009               4,922,941
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,863,589               6,326,712
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             470,151                  64,067
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (5,349,731)             (1,467,818)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (5,349,731)             (1,467,818)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (5,349,731)             (1,467,818)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.795)                  (.164)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.795)                  (.164)


</TABLE>
MICHAEL B. HORROW #162917

DONAHUE & HORROW LLP

222 North Sepulveda Blvd.

20th Floor

El Segundo, CA 90245

Telephone: (310) 335-2006

Fax: (310) 335-2001

Email: mhorrow@donahuehorrow.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ALFRED J. ANTONINI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALFRED J. ANTONINI,

Plaintiff,

vs.

THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE

COMPANY OF AMERICA, THE

PRUDENTIAL WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN,

THE PRUDENTIAL RETIREMENT PLAN, , 

Defendants.

Case No.: CIV. 04-0505 WBS KJM - PS

[The Honorable William B. Shubb]

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE

ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED BY AND BETWEEN plaintiff ALFRED J. ANTONINI, and

defendants PRUDENTIAL INSRUANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA et al., and their attorneys of

record, that the parties have resolved this matter in its entirety.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Donahue & Horrow LLP

Case 2:04-cv-00505-WBS -KJM Document 63 Filed 02/06/07 Page 1 of 2
IT IS HEREBY AGREED that the complaint on file herein shall be dismissed with prejudice,

each side to bear their own attorney fees and costs.

Dated: February 2, 2007 DONAHUE & HORROW LLP

/s/

 

MICHAEL B. HORROW

Attorneys for Plaintiff

ALFRED J. ANTONINI

Dated: February 2, 2007 WILSON, ELSER, MOSCOWITZ, EDELMAN &

DICKER LLP

/s/

 

SHERIDA STROBLE

Attorneys for Defendants

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

et al.,

O R D E R

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 5, 2007

Case 2:04-cv-00505-WBS -KJM Document 63 Filed 02/06/07 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4540 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4540

To enable passenger vessels that were not built in the United States to 
         receive coastwise endorsement, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2024

    Mr. Lee introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To enable passenger vessels that were not built in the United States to 
         receive coastwise endorsement, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Jobs in American Ports 
Act''.

SEC. 2. COASTWISE ENDORSEMENT FOR PASSENGER VESSELS.

    (a) In General.--Section 12112(a)(2)(B) of title 46, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii), by striking ``; or'' and inserting a 
        semicolon;
            (2) in clause (iii), by striking ``; and'' and inserting 
        ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                            ``(iv) is a vessel that transports 
                        passengers between ports or places in the 
                        United States to which the coastwise laws 
                        apply, either directly or via a foreign port; 
                        and''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 12121 of title 46, United States 
Code, is repealed.
    (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in the amendments made by this 
section shall be construed to exempt a vessel that transports 
passengers between ports or places in the United States to which the 
coastwise laws apply, either directly or via a foreign port, from any 
applicable law of the United States except as explicitly provided in 
such amendments.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





This Certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation (the company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. To
the best of my knowledge, the undersigned, in my capacities as set forth below, hereby certifies that:





| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    EDWARD L.
STERN Edward L. Stern

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date:  September 25, 2002







14
Before the Third Division,

April 5, 1949

No. 52989.

#### Givilliam Manufacturing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 47371-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

*277Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It-was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
# C_2006259EN.01000401.xml

| 27.10.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 259/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.10.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/4

---

Reply by the Council Presidency and the Commission to the letter from the USA's Department of Homeland Security

(2006/C 259/02)

| ‘Stewart Baker |
| --- |
| Assistant Secretary for Policy |
| U.S. Department for Homeland Security |
| Washington DC 20528 |

‘Stewart Baker

Assistant Secretary for Policy

U.S. Department for Homeland Security

Washington DC 20528

Dear Stewart,

On 11 October 2006 we received, by electronic transmission, your letter to the Council Presidency and the Commission, concerning the interpretation of certain provisions of the Undertakings issued by DHS on 11 May 2004 in connection with the transfer by air carriers of passenger name record (PNR) data.

While taking note of the content of your letter, we wish to reaffirm the importance that the EU and its Member States attach to respect for fundamental rights, in particular to the protection of personal data.

The commitments of DHS to continue to implement the Undertakings allow the EU to deem that, for purposes of the implementation of the Agreement, it ensures an adequate level of data protection.

Yours sincerely,

Irma ERTMAN

Jonathan FAULL’

---
Exhibit
      31.2














CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




I,
      John
      Chen, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of General Steel Holdings, Inc.;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
      a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
      made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
      not
      misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
      condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:




(a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
      relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
      known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in
      which this quarterly report is being prepared;




(b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by
      this report based on such evaluation;




(c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
      registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):












(a)  All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




(b)  Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls.















Date:
                November 14, 2006/s/
                John Chen_________________________________By:
                John ChenTitle:
                Director and Chief Financial
                Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Steven Lloyd Hronis,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1302 LKK PAN P

vs. Order

Runnels, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoNovember 19, 2004, the court denied plaintiff’s motion for

leave to proceed in forma pauperis upon the ground the

allegations in the complaint were in the realm of the fantastic,

delusional and irrational and so were frivolous. Plaintiff has

not paid the $150 filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)

(2000), and if he did this action would be dismissed as frivolous

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(c)(1), requiring courts to dismiss 

on their own motion frivolous suits brought by prisoners.

///

Case 2:04-cv-01302-LKK -PAN Document 11 Filed 04/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, the clerk of the court is directed to close

this file.

Dated: April 26, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01302-LKK -PAN Document 11 Filed 04/27/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1621 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1621

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 5, 2018

            Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To require the Federal Communications Commission to establish a 
 methodology for the collection by the Commission of information about 
 commercial mobile service and commercial mobile data service, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Wireless Access Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. METHODOLOGY FOR COLLECTION OF MOBILE SERVICE COVERAGE DATA.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``commercial mobile data service'' has the 
        meaning given the term in section 6001 of the Middle Class Tax 
        Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012 (47 U.S.C. 1401);
            (2) the term ``commercial mobile service'' has the meaning 
        given the term in section 332(d) of the Communications Act of 
        1934 (47 U.S.C. 332(d));
            (3) the term ``Commission'' means the Federal 
        Communications Commission;
            (4) the term ``coverage data'' means, if commercial mobile 
        service or commercial mobile data service is available, 
        information about the service, which may include available 
        speed tiers and performance characteristics; and
            (5) the term ``Universal Service program'' means the 
        universal service support mechanisms established under section 
        254 of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 254) and the 
        regulations issued under that section.
    (b) Methodology Established.--Not later than 180 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall promulgate 
regulations to establish a methodology that shall apply to the 
collection of coverage data by the Commission for the purposes of--
            (1) the Universal Service program; or
            (2) any other similar program.
    (c) Requirements.--The methodology established under subsection (b) 
shall--
            (1) contain standard definitions for different speed tiers, 
        such as the 2G, 3G, 4G, and 4G LTE tiers;
            (2) ensure that coverage data is collected in a consistent 
        and robust way;
            (3) improve the validity and reliability of coverage data; 
        and
            (4) increase the efficiency of coverage data collection.

            Passed the Senate March 1, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
No. 51995.

#### Lustgarten Fabrics, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 6997-K, etc. (New York).

*161Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It appeared from the testimony that the merchandise is of the same dutiable character as the umbrella cloth covered by *Caesar & Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 455, C. D. 515). On the authority of the cited case the protests were sustained as. to all of the claims made, according to the dates of entry or withdrawal from warehouse.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Chris Dick, Chief
Operating Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The
 Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                
| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | (2) The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant as of the
 dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Registrant
 for the periods presented.

|                      |                                                                                           
|--------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 19, 2009 | /s/ Chris
 Dick                                                                           
|                      |                                                                                           
|                      | Chris Dick                                                                                
|                      | Chief
 Operating Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
|                      | (Principal Executive
 Officer)                                                            

This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---