alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. (the
"Partnership") for the period ended June 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ahmass L.
Fakahany, Regular Trustee of the Trust and Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust
    and the Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ AHMASS L. FAKAHANY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Ahmass L. Fakahany *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee




                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.


                               By: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner



                               By:  /s/ AHMASS L. FAKAHANY
                                    --------------------------------------------
                               Name:    Ahmass L. Fakahany *
                               Title:   Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer



Dated: August 7, 2003
_____________________

*  Ahmass L. Fakahany functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of each of the Trust and the Partnership for
   purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(vi)



                    Special Retirement Benefit Adjustment for

                                 Kenneth Mlekush


     Upon normal retirement at age 65, the Corporation will increase the accrued
benefit from a projected 27.3% of final average earnings to 40% of final average
earnings in light of Mr. Mlekush's substantial contribution to the growth and
development of Jefferson Pilot Financial over the past 8 years. This benefit
will not vest until age 65, except that in the case of a triggering event
providing the benefits under Section 1 of the Corporation's Executive Change in
Control Severance Plan, the benefit will become vested immediately.

     This benefit will be payable under the Corporation's Executive Special
Supplemental Benefit.



                                      E-5
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4453 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4453

       To require the United States Postal Service to implement 
recommendations from the Inspector General of the United States Postal 
Service for decreasing instances of delayed mail and improving staffing 
                 and training, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 4, 2024

 Ms. Klobuchar introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To require the United States Postal Service to implement 
recommendations from the Inspector General of the United States Postal 
Service for decreasing instances of delayed mail and improving staffing 
                 and training, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Rural Mail Delivery Improvement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR THE POSTAL SERVICE TO IMPLEMENT CERTAIN 
              RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the United States Postal Service shall review and, to the extent 
practicable, implement the recommendations of the Inspector General of 
the United States Postal Service with respect to delayed mail, 
staffing, and training in the report by the Office of the Inspector 
General of the United States Postal Service entitled ``Delivery in 
Northern Minnesota: Audit Report'' (24-048-R24), dated May 6, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
No. 52010.

#### Wimelbacher & Rice *v.*United States,

protests 52011-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                          Exhibit 23-b
                                                                      
                                                                      
                                                                      
                                                                      
                                                                      
                                                                      
                                                                      
                                                                      
                                                                      
                  CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                                   
                                   
                                   


      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statement of Kansas City Power & Light Company on Form S-3 (File  Nos.
33-51799 and 333-17285) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-45618 and 33-58917)
of  our  report  dated  February  14,  1997,  on  our  audits  of  the
consolidated financial statements of Kansas City Power & Light Company
and  Subsidiary as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and  for  the  years
ended  December 31, 1996, 1995, and 1994, which report is included  in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




                                        /s/Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
                                          COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.




Kansas City, Missouri
March 14, 1997
No. 43991.

#### Protest 927041-G of Martinez Bros. (San Antonio).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
APPENDIX C

Page 1

SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

DOCKET DOT-OST-20110119

SUMMARY INFORMATION

All applicants must submit this information with their proposal, along with a completed form 

SF424 on http://www.grants.gov. 

A. APPLICANT INFORMATION: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

Not a Consortium Interstate Consortium Intrastate Consortium

Community now receives EAS subsidy

Community (or Consortium member) previously received a Small Community Grant

 

If previous recipient: Date of grant: Expiration date of grant:

B. PUBLIC/PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS: (LIST ORGANIZATION NAMES)

PUBLIC PRIVATE

1. 1.

2. 2.

3. 3.

4. 4.

5. 5.

C. PROJECT PROPOSAL: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)

Marketing Upgrade Aircraft New Route

Travel Bank Service Restoration Subsidy

Surface Transportation Regional Service Revenue Guarantee

Launch New Carrier Start-up Cost Offset First Service

Study Secure Additional Service Other (explain below)
APPENDIX C

Page 2

D. EXISTING LANDING AIDS AT LOCAL AIRPORT:

Full ILS Outer/Middle Marker Published Instrument Approach

Localizer Other (specify)

E. PROJECT COST: DO NOT ENTER TEXT IN SHADED AREA

LINE DESCRIPTION SUB TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT

1 Federal amount requested

2 State cash financial contribution

Local cash financial contribution

3a Airport cash funds

3b Non-airport cash funds

3 Total local cash funds (3a + 3b)

4 TOTAL CASH FUNDING (1+2+3)

In-Kind contribution

5a Airport In-Kind contribution**

5b Other In-Kind contribution**

5 TOTAL IN-KIND CONTRIBUTION 

(7a + 7b)

6 TOTAL PROJECT COST (4+8)

F. IN-KIND CONTRIBUTIONS**

For funds in lines 7a (Airport In-Kind contribution) and 7b (Other In-Kind contribution), please 

describe the source(s) of fund(s) for each.
APPENDIX C

Page 3

F. IS THIS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372

PROCESS?

a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 

Process for review on (date) _____________.

b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372, but has not been selected by the State for review.

c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

G. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT? (IF “YES”, PROVIDE 

EXPLANATION)

No Yes (explain) 

______________________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________________
**EXHIBIT 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002.**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes LemmerzInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarterly period ended April 30, 2005 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, James A. Yost, Vice President,Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of my knowledge:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     /s/ James A. Yost           James A. Yost *Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer*June 8, 2005
42
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE DENNIS ROUNDS, JR.,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1232 LKK DAD P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DIRECTOR OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges the loss of good time credits

following his disciplinary hearing on August 11, 2001. Pending before the court is petitioner’s

document styled, “Petitioner’s Ex Parte Motion For An Expedited Determination Of The

Magistrate Judge’s Recommendations And Findings.” Petitioner requests that the court issue its

findings and recommendations because he has a parole hearing scheduled in March of 2006, and

at past hearings, parole was denied because of the disciplinary ruling. 

The motion will be denied. This case is now submitted and in due course, the

court will issue its findings and recommendations as the court’s caseload will allow. 

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01232-LKK -DAD Document 9 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s January 6, 2006 ex

parte motion for an expedited determination by the magistrate judge, is denied.

DATED: February 15, 2006.

DAD:4

roun1232.stat

Case 2:04-cv-01232-LKK -DAD Document 9 Filed 02/16/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 49643.

#### Protests 72404-K, etc., of Littlejohn & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel sole crepe rubber similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *F. Lester Kittle, Inc.*(31 C. C. P. A. 233, C. A. D. 276) was held entitled to free entry as claimed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet Security Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company, certifies that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ THOMAS E. NOONAN   
|Thomas E. Noonan       
|Chairman, President and
|Chief Executive Officer



May 10, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 11



11. Statement re computation of per share earnings

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  Year ended             Year ended             Year ended
                                                              September 30, 2001     September 30, 2000     September 30, 1999

<S>                                                               <C>                    <C>                    <C>
Net income in thousands                                              $17,392                $21,045                $13,708


Weighted average shares outstanding                               15,724,423             14,698,456             14,894,162

Assumed exercise of stock options,
  weighted average of incremental shares                             770,231              1,384,753                412,820

Assumed purchase of stock under stock
  purchase plan, weighted average                                     88,372                 84,644                  7,868

Diluted shares - adjusted weighted-average shares
and assumed conversions                                           16,583,026             16,167,853             15,314,850


Basic earnings per share                                               $1.06                  $1.43                  $0.92

Diluted earnings per share                                             $1.05                  $1.30                  $0.90
</TABLE>
# sec5_custodialact_2019

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2018-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCA - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BAugust 2018
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Bruk, CEO, Secretary, Treasurer and a director of Xten Networks, Inc., certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xten Networks, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)	Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.	The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 14, 2004

/s/ Mark Bruk					Mark Bruk
CEO, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
No. 57272.

Suit 4705.

#### Werner G. Smith Co. Div. Archer Daniels Midland Co. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1357 affirmed December 17, 1952. C. A. D. 503.
- 1

- 

### S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N

**C O U R T O F A P P E A L S**

JEFFREY FLINT,

Plaintiff

- Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 27, 2018

v No. 340043

Genesee Circuit Court JOY SWEETIN, LC No. 17

- 321598

- DC

Defendant

- Appellee.

Before: M. J. K ELLY

, P .J., and J ANSEN and M ETER , JJ.

J ANSEN

, J

. ( dissenting )

Because I would not have granted defendant sole legal custody of the minor child, I

dissent.

The trial court almost exclusively relied on the “education component” in awarding defendant sole legal custody. Specifically, the trial court found that up until its ruling, the parties had been unable to agree on where the minor child would attend schoo l. Although disagreement on education is a factor properly considered by the trial court when awarding legal custody, in my view, the trial court adequately addressed the educational issue by awarding defendant physical custody of the minor child during t he school year, and granting plaintiff parenting time. Accordingly, the educational issue was resolved.

The only other factor cited by the trial court when awarding defendant sole legal custody was that parenting time exchanges were to take place at a police station. However, I do not believe that requiring parenting time exchanges take place at a police station justifies plaintiff losing the ability to have a say in legal or medical decisions regarding the minor child. This is particularly true where plaintiff consistently played an active role in the minor child’ s life, an d an established custodial environment existed with plaintiff. Further, with respect to the best interest factors, absent the educational issues, the trial court found the parties were virtually equal.

Based on the foregoing, I would vacate the portion of the trial court’s order granting defendant sole legal custody.

/s/ Kathleen Jansen
No. 54035.

#### Empire Twine & Yarn Co., Inc., and Antonio Piccini *v.*United States,

protests 140509-K and 138078-K (New York).

*374Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1803-1804]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-377]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer 
service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, February 20, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 
(toll-free), or 718-488-2085 (non toll-free).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, February 20, 2007 from 9 am ET to 
10 am ET via a telephone conference call. Individual comments will be 
limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the TAP consider a 
written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write 
Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, 
Brooklyn, NY 11201. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. Ms. Jenkins can be reached at 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-

[[Page 1804]]

488-2085, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: January 8, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-377 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 23.1.a



CONSENT OF COUNSEL

As Executive Vice President-Corporate and Shared Services and Secretary of Great Plains Energy Incorporated, I have reviewed the statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and consent to the incorporation by reference of such statements in the Company's previously-filed Form S-3 Registration Statements (Registration No. 333-97263 and Registration No. 333-87190) and Form S-8 Registration Statements (Registration No. 33-45618 and Registration No. 333-98781).

/s/Jeanie Sell Latz
Jeanie Sell Latz

Kansas City, Missouri
March 10, 2004