alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February
4, 2002 with respect to the consolidated financial statements included in this
Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, and our report
included in the following paragraph with respect to the financial statement
schedules, in the following Registration Statements:

        Form S-8, Nos. 2-36778, 2-56410, and 33-30530, pertaining to the Long
        Term Stock Incentive Plan and predecessor stock plans, and outstanding
        effective registration statements on Form S-16 included in such S-8
        filings;

        Form S-8, No. 33-56369, pertaining to the JP Teamshare Plan; and

        Form S-8, No. 33-64137, pertaining to the Non-Employee Directors' Stock
        Option Plan.

     Our audit also included the financial statement schedules of
Jefferson-Pilot Corporation listed in Item 14(a). These schedules are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedules
referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements
taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.

                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina
March 25, 2002

                                       E-7
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)   | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Nancy J. McGurk                                     |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Nancy                J. McGurk                                         |
| Title: | Chief                Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner |
| Date:  | November                13, 2006                                       |
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY SHAWN HENDERSON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1341 GEB CMK P

vs.

MIKE KNOWLES, Warden, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no

absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d

453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at

any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing

§ 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be

served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s February 16, 2007

request for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a

later stage of the proceedings.

DATED: March 7, 2007.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01341-GEB-CMK Document 33 Filed 03/07/07 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD DENNIS BLAMEY,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1256 LKK DAD P

vs.

TOM CAREY, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 5, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01256-LKK -DAD Document 32 Filed 08/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 5, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner’s January 28, 2005 motion for preliminary injunction and

declaratory relief is denied.

DATED: August 22, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/blam1256.805pi

Case 2:04-cv-01256-LKK -DAD Document 32 Filed 08/22/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 61816.

#### Falcon Import Co. *v.*United States,

protest 227315-K.

—Protest abandoned February 20, 1958. (Not published.) (Initial No. 158214-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF EARNINGS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITE
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         463,352
<SECURITIES>                                   627,179
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,854,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                   846,082
<INVENTORY>                                 33,311,201
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            59,047,802
<PP&E>                                       7,336,443
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,327,398
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              69,995,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,901,366
<BONDS>                                     16,202,549
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       397,572
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,494,191
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                69,995,678
<SALES>                                    155,097,745
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           155,097,745
<CGS>                                      122,993,172
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              122,993,172
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            27,639,567
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             971,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,493,753
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,415,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,078,753
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,078,753
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>
**BRIEFINGON TRAGEDYALONG THE ARIZONA-MEXICOBORDER: UNDOCUMENTEDIMMIGRANTSFACEDEATHIN THE DESERT**

**BEFORETHE ARIZONAADVISORYCOMMITTEETOTHE U.S. COMMISSIONON CIVILRIGHTS**

**TUCSON**

**AUGUST 23, 2002**

Membersof the Arizona Advisory Committee

ExecutiveSummary

Transcript
exhibit04_17.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



  





 



Summary of Seventh Amendment to Agreement to Supply Sugarcane, entered into by BrasilAgro and Brenco, on August 26, 2016, in connection with Fazenda Alto Taquari


Parties: Brasilagro – Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas and Brenco – Companhia Brasileira de Energia Renovável


Purpose: On May 8, 2015, Brasilagro granted to Brenco full, general, irrevocable and irreversible discharge of Brenco’s debts and obligations under the agreement. However, in 2016 Brasilagro identified that the amount  of R$ 317,373.53 had not been paid.  The purpose of the Seventh Amendment is to exclude the amount of R$ 317,373.53 from the discharge, recognizing the  mentioned debt.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at June 30, 1999 and the Statement of Operations for the
three months ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                 273
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          10,548
<ALLOWANCES>                           0
<INVENTORY>                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       10,548
<PP&E>                                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         15,007,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  401,497
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               12,123
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           15,027,635
<SALES>                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       0
<CGS>                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          23,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (23,803)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           (23,803)
<EPS-BASIC>                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0



</TABLE>
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10018.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10018.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Case 2:04-cv-01282-DFL-PAN   Document 17    Filed 07/28/05   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-01282-DFL-PAN   Document 17    Filed 07/28/05   Page 2 of 2

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-22T16:13:10-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Date:August 4, 2000

To:Wendy M. Comes, Executive Director

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

From:Judy Yuran, Chairman

Standard General Ledger – Issues Resolution Committee

Subject:Issues Resolution Committee (IRC) Response to the Exposure Draft of Credit Program Reconciliation and Technical Amendments to Accounting

Standards for Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees in Statements of Federal Financial Accounting Standards No. 2 and No. 18 

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Exposure Draft (ED) of Credit Program Reconciliation and Technical Amendments to Accounting Standards for Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees in Statements of Federal Financial Accounting Standards No. 2 and No. 18, dated May 10, 2000. The Issues Resolution Committee did not see a direct impact on the Standard General Ledger and therefore does not have any comments at this time.

Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this exposure draft.  Please feel free to call me on (202) 874-6308 if you need additional information.
No. 49641.

#### Protests 58454-K, etc., of Charles T. Wilson Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel sole crepe rubber similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *F. Lester Kittle, Inc.*(31 C. C. P. A. 233, C. A. D. 276) was held entitled to free entry as claimed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration 

# AGENCY:

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

The United States Grain Standards Act, as amended (Act), provides for state agency delegations at export port locations within a state. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (Minnesota) is delegated to provide official export inspection and weighing services. Minnesota requested that they cease providing official services on April 2, 2007. Accordingly, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA (GIPSA) is announcing that Minnesota's delegation will be cancelled effective April 2, 2007. 

# DATES:

Effective April 2, 2007. 

# ADDRESSES:

USDA, GIPSA, Karen Guagliardo, Chief, Review Branch, Compliance Division, STOP 3604, room 1647-S, 1400 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20250-3604. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Karen Guagliardo at 202-720-8262, e-mail                         *Karen.W.Guagliardo@usda.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This action has been reviewed and determined not to be a rule or regulation as defined in Executive Order 12866 and Departmental Regulation 1512-1; therefore, the Executive Order and Departmental Regulation do not apply to this action. 

Section 7(e)(2) of the Act authorizes GIPSA' Administrator to delegate authority to a qualified State agency to perform all or specified functions involved in official inspection at export port locations within the state. Minnesota has been delegated authority to provide official export and weighing services since April 7, 1978. On January 2, 2007, Minnesota requested that they cease providing official services on April 2, 2007. Accordingly, Minnesota's delegation will be cancelled. For export services in Minnesota after April 2, 2007, contact David Mundwiler, Field Office Manager, Toledo, Ohio, telephone number 419-259-6276. 

Authority:7 U.S.C. 71*et seq.*

Pat Donohue-Galvin, 

Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration.

 [FR Doc. E7-3646 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE 
 MOODY’S CORPORATION 

CAREER TRANSITION PLAN 
 The Moody’s Corporation Career Transition Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective as of the date this Fourth Amendment is adopted except where otherwise noted: 

 

	 	1.	Section 2 of Schedule C is amended by changing the first sentence to read: “All initial and disputed claims for benefits under the Plan shall be submitted to
the Senior Vice President Manager– Global Compensation or such other person designated by the Committee (the “Claims Administrator”).”
#### Estate of James G. FRAZIER, Deceased James G. Frazier, Jr., Executor Petitioner-Appellant, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-70012.

Tax Court No. 18886-97.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 11, 2001.

Decided May 3, 2001.

Before BEEZER, O’SCANNLAIN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue *503issued a notice of deficiency against the estate of James G. Frazier, alleging that certain improvements made by a commercial tenant upon property owned by Frazier had become the property of Frazier himself by the time of his death. The improvements at issue were made by Frazier Nut Farms, Inc. (“FNF”), a company Frazier had incorporated in 1981 and of which he was part owner at the time of his death. Shortly after incorporating FNF, Frazier granted the company a ten-year lease for five acres of land that he owned in Waterford, California. During the term of the lease, FNF installed buildings and other improvements upon the property at its expense. When the initial term of the lease expired, FNF remained on the land with the implied consent of Frazier and his family. Frazier died three months later.

Frazier’s executor filed the estate’s tax return based on the assumption that it owned the Waterford real property but not the improvements that FNF had made to it. The IRS disagreed, believing that the value of the estate included the value of the improvements. After its review, the Tax Court sided with the Commissioner and ruled that, under California law, ownership of the improvements passed to Frazier at the end of FNF’s original lease term. The estate appeals this decision.

We review the Tax Court’s conclusions of federal and state law *de novo. Estate of Rapp v. Commissioner,*140 F.3d 1211, 1215 (9th Cir.1998). The context of the agreement between FNF and Frazier leads us to conclude that FNF’s lease included an implied right to remove trade fixtures and an implied agreement that any holdover tenancy would continue according to the terms of the original lease (except as to duration). As a result, we believe that under California law FNF retained the right to remove trade fixtures it had installed on the Waterford property even after Frazier’s death. *See Woods v. Bank of Haywards,*10 Cal.App. 93, 106 P. 730 (1909). We believe that *Wadman v. Burke,*147 Cal. 351, 81 P. 1012 (1905), is inapposite because FNF and Frazier did not execute a new lease after the expiration of their original agreement. We therefore remand to the Tax Court for a determination of whether the improvements at issue were “trade fixtures” within the meaning of Cal. Civ.Code § 1019.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts *503of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Power & Light Company (the "Company") for the annual period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), William H. Downey, as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Andrea F. Bielsker, as Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|             | /s/William H. Downey                                                                       
|------------ | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |                                                                                            
|Name:
Title: | William H. Downey
President and Chief Executive Officer                                    
|Date:        | March 10, 2004                                                                             
|             |                                                                                            
|             | /s/Andrea F. Bielsker                                                                      
|             |                                                                                            
|Name:
Title: | Andrea F. Bielsker 
Senior Vice President - Finance, Chief Financial 
Officer and Treasurer
|Date:        | March 10, 2004                                                                             

This certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 except to the extent this Exhibit 32.2 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kansas City Power & Light Company and will be retained by Kansas City Power & Light Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.