alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the
“Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2010 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Carter J Ward, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.
C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:




(1)       The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)       Information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.





Date:
                        February
      14, 2011
                        
                        /s/
      Carter J. WardCarter
      J. WardChief
      Financial Officer ofElite
      Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Principal Accounting and Financial
      Officer





This
certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Before the First Division,

March 28, 1946

No. 50967.

#### Petition 6441-R of Herbert B. Moller (Tampa).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

From the testimony it appeared that the importer had cabled the manufacturer in Spain for prices on the floats prior to shipment of same but due to unusual wartime conditions did not receive an answer thereto until after entry. When the letter quoting higher prices was received, he did nothing about it, as he figured it was intended to cover only subsequent shipments. On the entire record and from an observation of the demeanor of the witnesses in court, it was held that neither the importer nor his brokers h‘ad any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to deceive or to mislead the appraiser. The petition was therefore granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         680,195                 132,565
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,643,390                 945,239
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (484,227)               (105,795)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,150,133                 443,969
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,186,382               1,540,348
<PP&E>                                      15,400,695               6,829,271
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,271,197)               (920,839)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,305,640              23,104,094
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,732,484               3,358,049
<BONDS>                                     32,395,375              17,197,865
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                     1,125,534                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,052,247               2,548,180
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,305,640              23,104,094
<SALES>                                     17,552,024              10,122,175
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,552,024              10,122,175
<CGS>                                        7,168,978               3,412,161
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,339,433               8,752,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (79,782)                (10,794)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,669,160               1,925,552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,376,787)               (545,343)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    26,350                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,403,137)               (545,343)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,403,137)               (545,343)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.32)                  (0.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>                   0<F1>
<FN>
<F1>Diluted loss per common share has been excluded since the results would be
antidilutive.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ROSA RIVERA KIM,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D15-806

[March 23, 2016]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, Judge; L.T. Case No. 13-2343 CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Tatjana Ostapoff, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No brief filed for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Rosa Rivera Kim appeals her convictions and sentences following an 

open no contest plea. Her assistant public defender filed a motion to 

withdraw as appellate counsel and a supporting brief pursuant to Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We affirm Kim’s convictions and 

sentences, but we remand the case to the trial court with directions to 

enter a corrected written probation order, reflecting that Kim entered a 

plea of nolo contendere, rather than reflecting that she was found guilty 

by jury verdict. 

Affirmed; Remanded with Instructions.

STEVENSON, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DESMON LOEB,

Plaintiff,

v.

T. FELKER, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. 2:04-cv-0730 LKK PAN P

PROPOSED ORDER

On May 10, 2006, defendants requested an extension of time of ten days to file and

serve a motion for summary judgment. 

Good cause appearing, defendants request is granted. Within ten days of the date of

this order, defendants shall file and serve a motion for summary judgment.

Dated: May 16, 2006.

\004

loeb0730.36(a)

Case 2:04-cv-00730-LKK -EFB Document 54 Filed 05/17/06 Page 1 of 1
unis-ex108_929.htm



 

Exhibit 10.8

February 15, 2016

Amgen Inc.

One Amgen Center Drive

Thousand Oaks, CA  91320-1799

Attention:  Corporate Secretary

Re:    Amendment of Exclusivity Letter

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Unilife Corporation (“Unilife”) and Amgen Inc. (“Amgen” and, together with Unilife, the “Parties”) have entered into an exclusivity letter agreement dated December 31, 2015 (the “Exclusivity Letter”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Exclusivity Letter.

Pursuant to Section 13 of the Exclusivity Letter, the Parties intend to hereby amend the Exclusivity Letter, and agree that the Exclusivity Period in Section 1(a) of the Exclusivity Letter shall be extended through and to 11:59 pm Pacific Time on Friday, February 26, 2016 so long as the Parties continue to negotiate in good faith a Transaction. 

 


	
Very truly yours,

	
 

	
UNILIFE CORPORATION

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ John Ryan

	
Name:
	
 
	
John Ryan

	
Title:
	
 
	
SVP, General Counsel & Secretary




CONFIRMED AND AGREED TO:

AMGEN INC.

 


	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ David Piacquad

	
Name: 
	
 
	
David Piacquad

	
Title: 
	
 
	
Sr. Vice President,

	
 
	
 
	
Business Development
6-5-2016

U.S.	Dept.	of	Transportation,

Docket	Operations	West	Building	Ground	Floor,

Room	w12-140	1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	SE.,

Washington,	DC	20590

Submitted	Electronically	via	the	Federal	Docket	Management	System	(FDMS)	

Dear	Sir	or Madam:

Richard	Moore	DBA:	Heavenly	Pictures, has	prepared	the	following	addendum	to	

Exemption	#	12796	Docket	FAA-2015-2626

This	addendum	adds	any	aircraft	identified	on	the	List	of	Approved	Unmanned	

Aerial	Systems	(UAS)	under	Section	333	at	regulatory	docket	FAA–2007–3330	at	

www.regulations.gov,	(which	is	updated	regularly)	when	weighing	less	than	55	

pounds	including	payload.

Allowing	the	use	of	any	aircraft	on	the	List	of	Approved	Unmanned	Systems	(UAS)	

has	been	used	recently	in	exemptions:

• Exemption	No.	15233	Regulatory	Docket	No.	FAA–2015–5418	

• Exemption	No.	15234	Regulatory	Docket	No.	FAA–2015–5360	

• Exemption	No.	15235	Regulatory	Docket	No.	FAA–2015–5272	

• Exemption	No.	15236	Regulatory	Docket	No.	FAA–2015–5253	

• Exemption	No.	15237	Regulatory	Docket	No.	FAA–2015–5236	

The	exemptions	listed	above	are	identical	in	nature	to	Richard Moore’s exemption	

and	therefore	no	new	precedent	would	be	set	by	extending	the	same	List	to	Richard	

Moore.	This	addendum	makes	no	other	changes	to	the	currently	approved	

exemption	12796 and/or	operating	parameters.	The	name	and	contact	information	

of	the	applicant	remains	the	same:	

Sincerely,	

Rick	Moore
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY ROY KEETON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0697 GEB JFM P

vs.

SERGEANT CAROLL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On January 20, 2005, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the

complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant Officer Carver was returned unserved

with a notation that said defendant has retired. Plaintiff must provide additional information if

this defendant is to be served. Plaintiff may seek such information through discovery, the

California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means available to

plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may

seek judicial intervention.

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00697-ALA Document 38 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one USM-285 form,

along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed April 7, 2004;

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form for defendant Officer Carver; 

b. Two copies of the endorsed complaint filed April 7, 2004; and

c. One completed summons form (if not previously provided) 

or show good cause why he cannot provide such information.

DATED: June 2, 2005.

12/kf

keet0697.8e 

Case 2:04-cv-00697-ALA Document 38 Filed 06/03/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY ROY KEETON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0697 GEB JFM P

vs.

SERGEANT CAROLL, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court’s

order filed :

 1 completed summons form

 1 completed USM-285 form

 2 copies of the April 7, 2004 

 Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-00697-ALA Document 38 Filed 06/03/05 Page 3 of 3
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08282013[9/13/2013 12:35:42 PM]

Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION &

INFORMATION POLICY

About OIRA

Information Policy

Federal Collection of

Information

Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside

Communication

Reports to Congress

For Agencies

Statistical Programs &

Standards

Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary

Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units

Date: 8 / 28 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable)

Bob Wayland EPA

Christian Fellner EPA

Barry Ellman EPA

Nick Hudson EPA

Alex Bond National Mining Assoc.

Hal Quinn National Mining Assoc.

Peter Glaser Troatryan Santers National Mining Assoc.

Rich Nolan National Mining Assoc.

Bruce Rodan OSTP

About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home

The White House Blog

Photos & Videos

Photo Galleries

Video

Performances

Live Streams

Podcasts

Briefing Room

Your Weekly Address

Speeches & Remarks

Press Briefings

Statements & Releases

White House Schedule

Presidential Actions

Legislation

Nominations &

Appointments

Disclosures

Issues

Civil Rights

Defense

Disabilities

Economy

Education

Energy & Environment

Ethics

Equal Pay

Foreign Policy

Health Care

Homeland Security

Immigration

The Administration

President Barack Obama

Vice President Joe Biden

First Lady Michelle Obama

Dr. Jill Biden

The Cabinet

White House Staff

Executive Office of the

President

Other Advisory Boards

About the White House

Inside the White House

Presidents

First Ladies

The Oval Office

The Vice President's

Residence & Office

Eisenhower Executive

Office Building

Camp David

Air Force One

White House Fellows

White House Internships

Tours & Events

Our Government

The Executive Branch

The Legislative Branch

The Judicial Branch

The Constitution

Federal Agencies &

Commissions

Elections & Voting

State & Local Government

Resources

Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site Search
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08282013[9/13/2013 12:35:42 PM]

Refinancing

Rural

Service

Seniors & Social Security

Snapshots

Taxes

Technology

Urban and Economic

Mobility

Veterans

Violence Prevention

Women

Mobile Apps

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact

USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

KEVIN ROBERSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

F. BATES,

Defendant.

2:04-CV-S-0772 DFL KJM P

ORDER

On July 13, 2006, Defendant filed a request to vacate the existing scheduling order in

light of the fact that this Court, on June 8, 2006, filed Findings and Recommendations,

recommending that Defendant’s motion for summary judgment be granted and that this action be

dismissed. That recommendation is pending before the Honorable David F. Levi. Based on

defendant’s request, and good cause showing, the prospective dates set in the scheduling order

are hereby vacated and will be reset at a later date if necessary. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 13, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00772-DFL -KJM Document 49 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          22,977
<SECURITIES>                                    39,338
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,020
<PP&E>                                           7,536
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,232
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,914
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,587
<BONDS>                                          1,746
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       105,566
<OTHER-SE>                                    (43,985)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,914
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 133
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,397)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,397)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,397)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1434

ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RATIONALWIKI FOUNDATION,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Liam O’ Grady, District Judge. (1:14-cv-00257-LO-TCB)

Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 28, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Otis Matthews appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 

complaint for failure to prosecute. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Matthews v. 

RationalWIKI Found., No. 1:14-cv-00257-LO-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2017). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Draft Meeting Agenda May 26 -27, 2010

Subcommittee meetings May 26 Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel ( 14th & K Streets, NW D.C.) 8:30 – 12:00 Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovation

1:00 – 3:30 Permits/NSR/Toxics/B act work group joint meeting

Clean Air Excellence Awards Program May 26 Almas Temple ( 1315 K Street next to Hamilton Crowne Plaza) 4:15 – 4:30 Movie – Air Science 40 - Celebrating Four Decades of Innovative Research 4:30 – 6:30 Clean Air Excellence Awards Ceremony 6:30 – 7:45 Awards Reception

Clean Air Act Advisory Committee Full Committee meeting May 27 Almas Temple ( 1315 K Street next to Hamilton Crowne Plaza)

8:00- 8:30 Registration

8:30 – 9:15 Welcome/Opening Comments

U.S. EPA Office of Air And Radiation Assistant Administrator Gina McCarthy

9:15 -9:45 Subcommittee Report Outs Mobile Sources Technical Review Subcommittee Report Out Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovation

Meet 2 of the Clean Air Excellence Award Winners 9:45 – 10:05 Bridging the Gap – Kristin Riott

10:05 – 10:30 ZGreen Certifica tion Program – Mayor Mick Ireland

10:30– 10:45 Break

10:45 – 12:15 BACT Workgroup Update – EPA initial response to Phase 1 BACT Report and status update on phase 2 of workgroup - Workgroup Chairs

12:15 – 1:30 Lunch

1:30 – 2:30 Voluntary and Community Programs Jay Benforado – Environmental Protection Agency

2:30– 3:30 Case Study for Incorporating Reducti ons from Renewable Portfolio Standards and Energy Efficiency Measures in SIPs Chris Stoneman – Environmental Protection Agency

3:30 – 3:45 Public Comments

3:45 – 4:15 Next meeting/Close
**Exhibit 12.1**
**IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION**
**COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                                           Year Ended December 31, (In Thousands) 2004      2003      2002      2001      2000      **Including Interest on Deposits**                                                                                 Earnings:                                        Earnings before income taxes $117,698      $118,402      $86,231      $74,200      $59,342     Fixed charges from below  92,225       99,099       97,795       121,083       93,539                                         Earnings $209,923      $217,501      $184,026      $195,283      $152,881                                                                                  Fixed charges:                                        Interest expense $92,225      $99,099      $97,795      $121,083      $93,539                                                                                  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  2.28   x   2.19   x   1.88   x   1.61   x   1.63   x                                                                              **Excluding Interest on Deposits**                                                                                 Earnings:                                        Earnings before income taxes $117,698      $118,402      $86,231      $74,200      $59,342     Fixed charges from below  47,738       56,734       43,434       47,743       40,719                                         Earnings $165,436      $175,136      $129,665      $121,943      $100,061                                                                                  Fixed charges:                                        Interest expense, excludinginterest on deposits $47,738      $56,734      $43,434      $47,743      $40,719                                                                                  Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  3.47   x   3.09   x   2.99   x   2.55   x   2.46   x
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Israel Bank of Agriculture Ltd. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lea
Patolovsky, General Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Lea Patolovsky
General Manager
July 9, 2003