alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

       (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

       (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                the Report.


                                       /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John A. Celentano, Jr.
                                       Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                       Officer


                                       /s/ Christine R. Piano
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Christine R. Piano
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

November 2, 2005
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4404 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

840 Front Street in Casselton, North Dakota, as the ‘‘Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2024 

Mr. CRAMER (for himself and Mr. HOEVEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 840 Front Street in Casselton, North Dakota, 

as the ‘‘Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. COMMANDER DELBERT AUSTIN OLSON POST 

4 OFFICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 840 Front Street in Casselton, 

7 North Dakota, shall be known and designated as the 

8 ‘‘Commander Delbert Austin Olson Post Office’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4404 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Commander Delbert 

5 Austin Olson Post Office’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 58534.

protests 207359-K, etc. (New York).

#### R. U. Delapenha & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9309]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3611]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 021607E]


International Whaling Commission; 59th Annual Meeting; 
Nominations

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; request for nominations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is a call for nominees for the U.S. Delegation to 
the May 2007 International Whaling Commission (IWC) annual meeting. The 
non-federal representative(s) selected as a result of this nomination 
process is(are) responsible for providing input and recommendations to 
the U.S. IWC Commissioner representing the positions of non-
governmental organizations. Generally, only one non-governmental 
position is selected for the U.S. Delegation.

DATES: The IWC is holding its 59th annual meeting from May 28-31, 2007, 
in Anchorage, Alaska. All written nominations for the U.S. Delegation 
to the IWC annual meeting must be received by March 30, 2007.

ADDRESSES: All nominations for the U.S. Delegation to the IWC annual 
meeting should be addressed to Bill Hogarth, U.S. Commissioner to the 
IWC, and sent via post to: Cheri McCarty, National Marine Fisheries 
Service, Office of International Affairs, 1315 East West Highway, SSMC3 
Room 12603, Silver Spring, MD 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cheri McCarty, 301-713-9090, ext. 183.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary of Commerce is charged with 
the responsibility of discharging the domestic obligations of the 
United States under the International Convention for the Regulation of 
Whaling, 1946. The U.S. IWC Commissioner has responsibility for the 
preparation and negotiation of U.S. positions on international issues 
concerning whaling and for all matters involving the IWC. He is staffed 
by the Department of Commerce and assisted by the Department of State, 
the Department of the Interior, the Marine Mammal Commission, and by 
other agencies. The non-federal representative(s) selected as a result 
of this nomination process is(are) responsible for providing input and 
recommendations to the U.S. IWC Commissioner representing the positions 
of non-governmental organizations. Generally, only one non-governmental 
position is selected for the U.S. Delegation.

    Dated: February 23, 2007.
William T. Hogarth,
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries 
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-3611 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION 

CONCERNING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES P. DeFAZIO, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HOLLISTER, INC.; et. al., 

Defendants. 

Case No.: CIV.S-04-1358 WBS GGH 

[Consolidated Master Case Number] 

ORDER REGARDING REQUEST FOR 

CLARIFICATION CONCERNING 

FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS 

THE FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 

Judge William B. Shubb 

Complaint 

Filed: July 15, 2004 

KATHLEEN ELLIS, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

HOLLISTER INCORPORATED et al., 

Defendants. 

Complaint 

Filed: March 22, 2005 

BRENDA DIMARO and 

HOLLIE LAVICK, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

HOLLISTER INCORPORATED, et al.,

Defendants. 

Complaint 

Filed: August 25, 2005 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 384 Filed 08/26/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 

PROPOSED ORDER ON STIPULATION REGARDING REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION 

CONCERNING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

The plaintiffs (other than plaintiff Kathleen Ellis) and defendants, The Firm of 

John Dickinson Schneider, Inc. (“JDS”), Hollister Incorporated (“Hollister”), Alan F. 

Herbert and Richard I. Fremgen have stipulated and jointly requested that the Court 

conduct a telephonic conference with counsel (a) to clarify what effect, if any, Rule 

12(d) of the Federal Rules of Procedure will have on defendants’ presently pending 

Motion to Dismiss Certain Claims in the Fifth Amended Complaint; and (b) to 

address the appropriate course of further proceedings on defendants’ pending 

Motion to Dismiss. The court, however, declines to hold such a hearing. Whatever 

effect Rule 12(c) may or may not have on defendant’s pending motion is a question 

of law, which the court will have to determine after considering the respective 

positions of the parties as set forth in their pleadings and arguments. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 26, 2008 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 384 Filed 08/26/08 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10071)

#### Margaret & William Zimmerman *v.*United States

Entry No. 977005.

(Decided August 22, 1961)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*William B. Orriclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

When the above-enumerated appeal for a re-appraisement was called for hearing, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff. The court thereupon ordered the case submitted.

Eule 5(a) of the rules of the court provides that—

> The submission for decision of any case shall be made in open court by the parties thereto or their attorneys, or by stipulation, or by written request to the court, or by the court on its own motion. Where the plaintiff, petitioner, or appellant, or his attorney, in a ease does not appear when the same is called, and after the opposite party has had opportunity to present evidence on the issues, it may be deemed submitted and may be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein.

Accordingly, I have examined the record in the appeal before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find and hold, therefore, that the proper value of the merchandise is the value returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
f * PD-1461-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/9/2015 5:20:52 PM Accepted 12/11/2015 12:15:40 PM 

## NO. PD-1461-15 ABELAC?Irk JACOB WESLEYFAUDI § IN THE COURT OF § VS. § CRIMINALAPPEALS 

# STATEOFTEXAS § OFTEXAS A^MUjSECOND MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARYREVIEW TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT: 

### Now comes Jacob Wesley Faudi, Appellant in the above styled and numbered cause, and moves for an extension oftime ofone week to file a petition 

### for discretionary review, and for good cause shows the following: 1. On October 8, 2015, the Court of Appeals affirmed appellant's conviction. Jacob Wesley Faudi v. State, 2015 WL 5965362. 

### 2. The Court has previously granted one extension until 12/9/2015 to 

### submit his petition. This previous request was made because ofmultiple cases that Appellate Counsel was working on including presenting oral argument in cause no. 14-51173 in the 5th Circuit Court ofAppeals on 12/2/2015. Appellate Counsel 

### anticipated completing the PDR in this case over the past week, but has been 

### unable to do so.Appellate Counsel needs oneadditional week to complete it, until December 16, 2015. FILED IN 

### 3. Defendant is currently incarcerated. COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEALS December 11, 2015 ABELACOSTA, CLERKWHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, appellant respectfully requests an extension ofone week, i.e. until December 16, 2015, to file a petition for discretionary review. 

### Respectfully submitted, Law Office ofDenton B. Lessman 100 N. 6th Street, Ste. 702 Waco, TX 76701 Tel: (254) 776-4544 Fax:(254)776-4551

By: Denton B. Lessman State Bar No. 24042474 

### DLessmanAtty@aol.com Attorney for Jacob Wesley Faudi

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

### This is to certify that on December 10, 2015, a true and correct copy ofthe above and foregoing document was served on the State Prosecutor's Office and the McLennan CountyDistrictAttorney's Office via facsimile.

Denton B. Lessman
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER



I, Nelson A. Locke, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Amstar Financial Services, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2003

/s/Nelson A. Locke
------------------------
Nelson A. Locke
Chief Executive Officer



                                       13
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10197]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3963]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL03-229-002]


Nevada Power Company; Notice of Filing

February 27, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 20, 2007, Nevada Power Company filed a 
compliance filing consisting of an amended interconnection agreement 
with Mirant Las Vegas, LLC, the Mirant Las Vegas, LLC Final 
Interconnection Audit, and a Mirant settlement calculation, pursuant to 
Paragraphs (B) and (C) of the Commission's January 19, 2007 Order.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a4e2e1f6e7ebcac8cdcac1f7d1d4d4cbd6d0e4c2c1d6c78ac3cbd2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6e282b3c2d21000207000b3d1b1e1e011c1a2e080b1c0d40090118">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 13, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3963 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
R

o

p

e

r

s

M

aje

s

ki K

o

h

n

&

B

e

ntle

y

A

Professional Corporation

Redwood City

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

RC1/373300.1/RMF - 1 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: FILING OF AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM 

CASE NO. CIV-S-04-1447 MCE (GGH) 

PAMELA E. COGAN (SBN 105089) 

ROBERT M. FORNI, JR. (SBN 180841) 

ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 

1001 Marshall Street, Third Floor 

Redwood City, CA 94063 

Telephone: (650) 364-8200 

Facsimile: (650) 780-1701 

Email: pcogan@ropers.com

rforni@ropers.com

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JOSE A. LOPEZ and DIANA LOPEZ, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, JOSE A. LOPEZ, JR., and 

DOES 1-20, 

Defendant. 

CASE NO. CIV-S-04-1447 MCE (GGH) 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: FILING 

OF AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM [L.R. 83-

143] 

Honorable Morrison C. England, Jr. 

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Counterclaimant, 

v. 

JOSE A. LOPEZ, DIANA LOPEZ, and 

JOSE A. LOPEZ, JR., 

Counter-Defendants. 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between plaintiffs/counterdefendants JOSE A. LOPEZ and DIANA LOPEZ and defendant/counterclaimant LIBERTY 

MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, through their respective attorneys of record, that 

defendant and counterclaimant may file an Amended Counterclaim in this action, a copy of which 

is attached hereto as Exhibit “A.” 

Case 2:04-cv-01447-MCE -GGH Document 32 Filed 05/23/05 Page 1 of 2
R

o

p

e

r

s

M

aje

s

ki K

o

h

n

&

B

e

ntle

y

A

Professional Corporation

Redwood City

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

- 2 - 

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that plaintiffs/counter-defendants 

waive notice and service of the Amended Counterclaim and shall not be required to reply to the 

Amended Counterclaim, and that all denials, objections, responses and affirmative defenses 

contained in the reply filed by plaintiffs/counter-defendants to the original Counterclaim shall be, 

and hereby are, responsive to the Amended Counterclaim. 

IT IS SO STIPULATED. 

Dated: April _____, 2005 SCHWARZKOPF & ALLIN 

By: 

JON S. ALLIN 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants, 

JOSE A. LOPEZ and DIANA LOPEZ 

Dated: April _____, 2005 ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY 

By: 

PAMELA E. COGAN 

ROBERT M. FORNI, JR. 

Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant, 

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE 

COMPANY 

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: May 20, 2005 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:04-cv-01447-MCE -GGH Document 32 Filed 05/23/05 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION


     To my  knowledge,  this Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June 30,
2002,  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, and the  information  contained in this Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of BCSB Bankcorp Inc.


                                By: /s/ Gary C. Loraditch
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Name: Gary C. Loraditch
                                    Title: President



                                By: /s/ Bonnie M. Klein
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                    Name: Bonnie M. Klein
                                    Title: Vice President, Treasurer

Date: August 12, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY ROY KEETON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0697 GEB JFM P

vs.

SERGEANT CAROLL, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed June 3, 2005, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return

to the court, within sixty days, the USM-285 form and other document necessary to effect service

on defendant Officer Carver, or to show cause why he could not provide the required

information. That sixty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way

to the court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendant

Carver be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

Case 2:04-cv-00697-ALA Document 48 Filed 08/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 22, 2005. 

/keet0697.fusm2

Case 2:04-cv-00697-ALA Document 48 Filed 08/22/05 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

June 21, 1956

No. 60059.

#### S. S. Kresge Co. *v.*United States,

protest 242434-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the articles in question are toys made of wood shavings, sculptured into shape, tied with wire, and then covered with fur; that they are not “stuffed animal figures not having a spring mechanism”; and that they are not composed in chief value of china, porcelain, parían, bisque, earthenware, or stoneware, or wholly or in chief value of rubber. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.