alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(6)


                    NOTE EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

         THIS NOTE AND EXTENSION MODIFICATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered
into by and between JILCO INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation ("Payor")
and LEONARD M. ROSS, a California resident ("Payee").

         Payor and Payee do hereby mutually acknowledge and agree that Payor is
presently liable for the indebtedness represented by a certain promissory note
payable to Payee dated August 9, 1972 in the original principal amount of FIVE
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00) ("Note"). Payor has requested Payee to extend the
maturity date of said Note and Payor is willing to do so.

         NOW, THEREFORE, FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION IN HAND
RECEIVED, the parties hereto, and each of them, do hereby agree that effective
as of the date hereof, the unpaid principal portion of the Note and all unpaid
accrued interest, if any, shall be all due and payable on December 31, 1994.

         Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to affect the obligation of
Payor regarding the payment of interest accrued on the Note through the date
hereof, or to affect any obligations of Payor under the Note, except as set
forth herein.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, and each of them, have executed
this Agreement as of the 1st day of December, 1992.

                      JILCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                      a California corporation


                      By /s/ Martha J. Kretzmer
                         ----------------------------------
                         Martha J. Kretzmer
                         President

                      "Payor"



                         /s/ Leonard M. Ross
                         ----------------------------------
                         Leonard M. Ross

                      "Payee"
Directions For Printing Air Logic Models

 

The Logic Models presented on this page were originally formatted to be printed out on a Plotter Printer that 

prints 36" long and 48" wide. If you have a Plotter Printer please download from the Plotter side of the table. (Below)

If you do not have access to a plotter printer, the models may be printed on a regular printer. If you are going to 

use a regular printer download from the Regular Printer side of the table. (Below) This will require piecing each model 

together. When printing from Acrobat Reader you should make sure that the Comments Box is checked within the Print 

Range box of the Acrobat Printer Setup Screen. If this box is not checked the page numbers will not print. The diagrams 

below show the order in which the pages will print. This will help in attaching the sheets and putting the models together.

Models with 

3 Pages

Models with 

4 Pages

Models with 

6 Pages

Page 1 Page 2 Page 1 Page 3 Page 1 Page 4

Page 3 Page 2 Page 4 Page 2 Page 5

Page 3 Page 6

Plotter Printer

Model Regular Printer

Plotter1.1.1.pdf - 19KB Subobjective 1.1.1: Attain MAAQS for Ozone Regular1.1.1.pdf - 43KB

Plotter1.1.2.pdf - 22KB Subobjective 1.1.2: NAAQS for Particulate Matter Regular1.1.2.pdf - 39KB

Plotter1.1.3.pdf - 18KB Subobjective 1.1.3: Improve Visibility Regular1.1.3.pdf - 32KB

Plotter1.1.4.pdf - 17KB Subobjective 1.1.4: Attain Carbon Monoxide NAAQS Regular1.1.4.pdf - 38KB

Plotter1.1.5.pdf - 18KB Subobjective 1.1.5: Attain Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS Regular1.1.5.pdf - 40KB

Plotter1.1.6.pdf - 17KB Subobjective 1.1.6: Maintain Nitrogen Dioxide NAAQS Regular1.1.6.pdf - 39KB

Plotter1.1.7.pdf - 16KB Subobjective 1.1.7: Attain Lead NAAQS Regular1.1.7.pdf - 34KB

Plotter1.1.8(a).pdf -

12KB

Subobjective 1.1.8(a): Conduct NAAQS-Related Research 

(Tropospheric Ozone Component)

Regular1.1.8(a).pdf -

23KB

Plotter1.1.8(b).pdf -

14KB

Subobjective 1.1.8(b): Conduct NAAQS-Related Research (Particulate 

Matter Health Risk Model)

Regular1.1.8(b).pdf -

31KB

Plotter1.2.1.pdf - 10KB Subobjective 1.2.1: Conduct Air Toxics Research Regular1.2.1.pdf - 22KB

Plotter1.2.2.pdf - 16KB Subobjective 1.2.2: Characterize Air Toxics Regular1.2.2.pdf - 37KB

Plotter1.2.3.pdf - 17KB Subobjective 1.2.3: Reduce Cancer and Non-Cancer Risks from Air 

Toxics

Regular1.2.3.pdf - 37KB

Plotter1.3.1.pdf - 16KB Subobjective 1.3.1: Reduce Acid Rain Precursors Regular1.3.1.pdf - 33KB
Fw:Published discussion of the Xact Multi Published discussion of the Xact Multi Published discussion of the Xact Multi -Metals CEMS performance while Metals CEMS performance while Metals CEMS performance while 

at Lilly..... at Lilly.....Jacksonville IT Jacksonville IT Jacksonville IT 3,2011

Jeff Ryan Jeff Ryan to: David Ogulei, Sarah Marshall, Charles Hall, Dan 

Bivins, Kim Garnett 09/26/2012 03:38 PM

Info from Rick Lambert to share with you.

____________________________________________________

 Jeff Ryan

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

 Office of Research and Development

 National Risk Management Research Laboratory

 Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division

 Air Pollution Technology Branch

 109 T.W. Alexander Drive

 Mail Drop E305-01

 Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

 (919) 541-1437 (919) 541-0554 FAX

 "And all this science, I don't understand." 

 "It's just my job 5 days a week"

 Elton John - Rocket Man

____________________________________________________

----- Forwarded by Jeff Ryan/RTP/USEPA/US on 09/26/2012 04:36 PM -----

From: Richard H Lambert <lambert_richard_h@lilly.com>

To: Jeff Ryan/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Michael L Foster <foster_michael_l@lilly.com>

Date: 09/26/2012 12:49 PM

Subject: Published discussion of the Xact Multi-Metals CEMS performance while at Lilly..... Jacksonville IT3, 

2011

Jeff,

I thought I would forward several recent publications by Lilly regarding our positive experience with the 

Xact multi-metals CEMS. We can discuss this and any questions you or Region V have on the 

conference call, but I thought the attached publications would provide documentation around our 

experience. I believe we (Lilly) have been very straight forward on our positive experience with the Xact 

and have published this quite a bit.

Once you get an idea of what day(s) and/or times next week work, I will schedule the call.

Rick
Rick Lambert

Eli Lilly

Engineering Tech Center

Phone: 317-276-1820

Cell Phone: 317-319-0523

Email: rhlambert@lilly.com

IT3 Paper on T149 CPT.ppt IT3 Paper on T149 CPT.ppt IT3 2011 Lambert.ppt IT3 2011 Lambert.ppt

Execution of Comprehensive Performance Test using Particulate rev 1.doc
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 (theReport), I, Gail P. Seneca, Chairman of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that tothe best of my knowledge:
 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
Date: August 9, 2004     By: /s/ GAIL P. SENECA       Gail P. Seneca   Chief Executive Officer   (Principal Executive Officer)  
          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and will be retained byLuminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4042 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
(V.D. 123)

#### Manca, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 967240, etc.

(Decided April 1, 1963)

*Eugene R. PieJerell*for the plaintiffs.

*JoJm W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in Manca, *Inc., et al.*v. *United*States, 40 Cust. Ct. 514, Abstract 61799. The conclusion therein, and the judgment issued pursuant thereto, were to the effect that the protests had been prematurely *346filed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge in reappraisement to determine the proper dutiable values in the manner provided by law. (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d).)

Stipulated facts, upon which these cases have been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the microscopes and cabinets therefor, covered by the following entries involved herein, is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value for said merchandise is as follows:

> Entry No. Merchandise United States dollars per each

> 967240 Greenough-Stereo tubes 138.72 less 25%

> Cabinets for above 13.44 “

> WH102257 Dialux Microscopes 572.16 “

> Cabinets for above 21.00 “ “

> 960213 Microscopes BMe 192.64 “

> Cabinets for above 21.00 “

> WH45130 Microscopes BIOPOL 360.08 “

> Cabinets for above 17.92 “

> WH52521 Polarizing Microscopes AM 572.04 “

> Cabinets for above 22.96 “

> WH47396 Microscopes HO 20/02 70.84 “

> Cabinets for above 7.56

> Microscopes HO 20/96 78.68 “

> Cabinets for above 7.56 “ '■ “

On the basis of the record before me, I hold that the proper dutiable values of the merchandise in question are as hereinabove itemized, and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 59539.

protests 234330-K and 237186-K (San Francisco).

#### Ch. Chraime *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Foed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers

Withdrawal of Reasonable Accommodation Request

I, _______________________________, voluntarily withdraw my request for 

reasonable accommodation (RA) dated ___________________, and request closure 

of the file. I understand that FLETC Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Office will 

close the RA file, and discontinue further processing of the request. I understand that I 

may make a request for RA at any time, orally or in writing, to a supervisor or manager 

in my chain of command, the FLETC EEO Office, or if applying for another position, the 

Human Capital Office. I have submitted a signed copy of this written withdrawal to the 

address indicated below: 

FLETC EEO Office

1131 Chapel Crossing Road, TH 379 

Glynco, Georgia 31524

Attention: Disability Program Manager

FLETC-EEO@fletc.dhs.gov

_______________ 

Date

FTC-256-05-06 (01/20)

_________________________________________________

Employee's Name & Signature

Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2004, of El Paso Production Holding Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Lisa A. Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify (i) that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ Lisa A. Stewart
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lisa A. Stewart
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)

                                        October 28, 2004








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Production Holding Company and will be retained by El Paso
Production Holding Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.2


                     CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

          Pursuant to Section 906(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     The undersigned,  being the Chief Financial  Officer of Xanser  Corporation
(the "Company")  hereby  certifies that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended  December 31, 2002,  filed with the United States  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  pursuant to Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934  (15  U.S.C.  78m or  78o(d)),  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that  information  contained in such Annual Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Date:    March 28, 2003


                                                //s//  HOWARD C. WADSWORTH
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Howard C. Wadsworth
                                         Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary
                                         (Chief Financial Officer)
notice of entry pertaining to a purported order dismissing Platte River, the 

order attached to the notice of entry bore no district court file stamp. 

Both appellant and respondent responded to our order to show 

cause, asserting that the claims against Patton were orally dismissed by 

stipulation on October 2, 2013. But as no written stipulation or order has 

been filed, the oral stipulation remains ineffective for final judgment 

purposes. NRCP 41(a); Div. Child & Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial 

Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 451, 92 P.3d 1239, 1243 (2004). Appellant also 

asserts that Platte River was dismissed by district court order, but the 

order attached to its response, like that attached to its docketing 

statement, bears no district court stamp. As a result, that order is 

ineffective. See NRCP 58; Div. Child & Family Servs., 120 Nev. at 451, 92 

P.3d at 1243. Thus, it appears that the district court has not yet entered a 

final judgment resolving all of the claims against all of the parties below. 

As a result, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, and we 

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

R ekvi J. 

Pickering 

1824—ACi r j- Parraguirre Saitta 

cc: Hon. Valorie J. Vega, District Judge 

William C. Turner, Settlement Judge 

Royal & Miles, LLP 

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A el.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

JAMES P. DeFAZIO, et al.,

NO. CIV. S-04-1358 WBS GGH

NO. CIV. S-05-0559 WBS GGH

Plaintiffs, NO. CIV. S-05-1726 WBS GGH

CONSOLIDATED 

v. ORDER RE:REMOVAL OF PLAN

TRUSTEES

HOLLISTER, INC.; et al.,

Defendants.

 ----oo0oo----

At the hearing on June 25, 2007, the parties agreed

that plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment would be

denied without prejudice to its being renewed after resolution of

defendants’ motion to dismiss the third amended complaint. 

However, plaintiffs’ attorneys asked the court to consider their

motion for removal of HolliShare’s trustees.

At common law, a court was empowered to remove a

trustee when it found that continuation as a trustee would harm

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 222 Filed 06/28/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

the beneficiary’s interests. Donovan v. Mazzola, 716 F.2d 1226,

1238 (9th Cir. 1983). “Under the broad remedial provision of

ERISA courts have also found removal of fiduciaries to be an

appropriate remedy upon findings of imprudence, divided

loyalties, and prohibited transactions.” Id. (citing Freund v.

Marshall & Ilsley Bank, 485 F. Supp. 629 (W.D. Wis. 1979);

Marshall v. Kelly, 465 F. Supp. 341 (W.D. Okla. 1978)). 

Plaintiffs request that the court remove HolliShare’s trustees. 

Plaintiffs argue that “where trustees commit numerous

ERISA violations, the district may (in its discretion) remove

those individuals from their position as trustees of the plan.” 

However, because plaintiffs’ summary judgment motions are no

longer before the court, there is nothing upon which the court

could base any finding of ERISA violations, much less imprudence,

divided loyalties, prohibited transaction, or any other basis for

removing the trustees. Ordering the removal of trustees is

something that the court would only do in extraordinary

circumstances after it was fully informed. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion to

remove HolliShare’s trustees be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. 

DATED: June 28, 2007

 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 222 Filed 06/28/07 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10043)

#### Isaac B. Cohen & Sons Corp. D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 985007/2; 967822.

(Decided June 29, 1961)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*William S. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated above for decision upon stipulation, upon the basis of which I find that the proper basis of value of the rubber-soled footwear involved is export value, as defined in section 402a (d), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such value is the appraised unit values, less the item of 2 per centum inspection fees, as stated on the invoices.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit
32.1








KINDER
MORGAN, INC.


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906


OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kinder Morgan, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in
the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Knight Inc. and will be retained by Kinder Morgan, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.








Dated:  March
      5, 2010
            
            /s/
      Richard D. KinderRichard
      D. Kinder
              Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2

ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.
                     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Schall, Chief Financial Officer of Essex Property Trust,
Inc., the general partner of the registrant Essex Portfolio, L.P., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Essex Portfolio,
L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

1. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
2. The general partner's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
3. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
4. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
5. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

1. The general partner's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the general partner's auditors and the audit committee of the
general partner's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

August 13, 2003

By: /s/ MICHAEL J. SCHALL

Michael J. Schall
                  Cheif Financial Officer
                  Essex Property Trust, Inc., general partner of
                  Essex Portfolio, L.P.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 (theReport), I, Christopher J. Zyda, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
Date: May 7, 2004     By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZYDA       Christopher J. Zyda   Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)  
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and will be retained byLuminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.