alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD DWANE BROOK,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOM L. CAREY, WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

2:04-CV-1254 EJG GGH P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF

DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO

THE COURT’S ORDER

Defendants’ request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s request for

production of documents pursuant to the July 12, 2006, order was considered by this Court, and

good cause appearing:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants shall submit their response to

Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents no later than August 23, 2006.

Dated: 8/15/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

__________________________________

The Honorable Gregory G. Hollows

broo1254.po

Case 2:04-cv-01254-GGH Document 77 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 1
(Reap. Dec. 8647)

Entry No. 9810.

#### W. C. Sullivan & Company *v.*United States

(Decided September 14, 1956)

*Wallace & Schwartz (Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*by *Edward N. Glad*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

*505On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the Techmaster 1144 drawing sets here involved, and that such value was $1.80 per set, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

JAMES P. DeFAZIO,

Plaintiff,

v. NO. CIV. S-04-1358 WBS GGH

HOLLISTER, INC.; et al.,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

STATUS ORDER

After reviewing the parties' Joint Status Report, the

court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference

scheduled for July 30, 2007. 

As there is currently in effect a stay of discovery

entered by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on November 28,

2006; and as the parties have stipulated to August 29, 2007 as

the date by which a response to the Third Amended Complaint is to

be filed;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Status (Pretrial

Scheduling) Conference is rescheduled for September 24, 2007 at

2:00 p.m. in Courtroom No. 5. The parties are required to file a

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 227 Filed 07/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

joint status report no later than September 10, 2007.

DATED: July 13, 2007

 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 227 Filed 07/13/07 Page 2 of 2
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 9/14/2023 1

Dismissing a Defective Pro Se Application 

for a Temporary Restraining Order 

Webb-Goodwin v. Butler 

(Lance M. Africk, E.D. La. 2:04-cv-2653) 

A candidate who came in sixth in an election rife with mechanical 

and logistical difficulties filed a pro se federal complaint to nullify 

the election. The district court denied the plaintiff a temporary restraining order because the plaintiff had shown neither service on 

defendants nor affidavit compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(b). A state-court action also was dismissed for lack of 

service. 

Subject: Voting irregularities. Topics: Enjoining elections; 

voting technology; pro se party; matters for state courts. 

An unsuccessful candidate for Orleans Parish’s school board filed a pro se 

federal complaint in the Eastern District of Louisiana on Friday, September 

24, 2004, to nullify results of a September 18 election and enjoin an October 

2 runoff election because of various alleged errors in election administration.1

 The plaintiff came in sixth among six candidates for the second district.2

 She also filed a pro se action in state court on September 23.3

On September 27, Judge Lance M. Africk denied the plaintiff relief and 

dismissed the complaint without prejudice.4

Although plaintiff avers that she intends to serve the complaint on defendants, there is no evidence before the Court demonstrating that defendants have received notice of this action. . . . 

Plaintiff has not submitted an affidavit nor verified the allegations in 

her complaint. Therefore, plaintiff’s application for an ex parte temporary 

restraining order requesting the above-mentioned relief is not in compliance with [Federal Rule of Civil Procedure] 65(b).5

The state-court action also was dismissed, and the court of appeal affirmed one of the reasons: lack of effective service on all defendants.6

1. Complaint, Webb-Goodwin v. Butler, No. 2:04-cv-2653 (E.D. La. Sept. 24, 2004), D.E. 

1; see James Varney, Candidates File Suits Over Polling Mix-Ups, New Orleans Times Picayune, Sept. 25, 2004, Metro, at 1. 

2. See Aesha Rasheed & Brian Thevenot, School Board Shake-Up, New Orleans Times 

Picayune, Sept. 19, 2004, at 1 (reporting also, “Voting machine problems that left at least 90 

precincts without voting machines well into election day caused problems in five of the seven districts, particularly the 2nd District.”). 

3. Webb-Goodwin v. Butler, 883 So. 2d 534, 536 (La. App. 2004). 

4. Order, Webb-Goodwin, No. 2:04-cv-2653 (E.D. La. Sept. 27, 2004), D.E. 3. 

5. Id. at 2; see Order, id. (Oct. 1, 2004), D.E. 6 (denying reconsideration). 

6. Webb-Goodwin, 883 So. 2d 534, review denied, 883 So. 2d 1041 (La. 2004) (noting failure to timely file); see Susan Finch, Judicial Election to Be Rerun, New Orleans Times Picayune, Oct. 15, 2004, Metro, at 1.
No. 49625.

#### Protest 101835-K of Western States Importing Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An oral stipulation was entered into by counsel to the effect that the proper dutiable weight is 21 pounds. The claim that the liquidation is erroneous was sustained. However, the protest originally claimed 22 pounds to be the proper weight, but a line was drawn through the typewritten figures and the number 21 written alongside. As the court cannot recognize, an unauthorized alteration in the pleadings, and as the protest originally claimed 22 pounds, the court was unable to give plaintiff the benefit of a less quantity and the collector was therefore directed to take duty upon 22 pounds.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II, 

 Plaintiff, No. 2:04-cv-01225 MCE AC P 

 vs. 

TOM L. CAREY, et al., 

 Defendants. ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 / AD TESTIFICANDUM

 Earnest Cassell Woods, II, inmate # D58091, a necessary and material witness in 

proceedings in this case on January 7, 2016, is confined in California State Prison-Centinela, 

2302 Brown Road, Imperial, CA 92251, in the custody of the Warden; in order to secure this 

inmate’s attendance it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue 

commanding the custodian to produce the inmate in Court, 8th Floor, Courtroom 26, United 

States District Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California on August 20, 2015, at 9:00 a.m. 

 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court, 

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to testify in United States District 

Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of court proceedings or 

as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution; 

 2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate 

and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and 

 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to fax a courtesy copy of this order and writ of 

habeas corpus ad testificandum to the Litigation Coordinator at California State Prison-Centinela 

at (760) 337-7650 and serve a courtesy copy on the Out-To-Court Desk, California State Prison - 

Sacramento, P.O. Box 290007, Represa, California 95671. 

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM 

To: The Warden CSP-Centinela, 2302 Brown Road, Imperial, CA 92251: 

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before the United 

States District Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of the 

proceedings or as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above 

institution. 

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the 

inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

DATED: July 31, 2015 

___________/S/ Allison Claire__________ 

 ALLISON CLAIRE 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 349 Filed 07/31/15 Page 1 of 1
EX-4.3



 Exhibit 4.3 

FIRST AMENDMENT, dated as of October 6, 2015 (this “Amendment”), to
the Third Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of April 4, 2014 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”), by and among Athene Holding Ltd., a Bermuda exempted company limited by shares (the
“Company”), and the shareholders party thereto (the “Shareholders”). 
 W I T N
E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Shareholders
desire to amend the Registration Rights Agreement to reflect certain modified terms as set forth below. 
 NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and with the intent
to be legally bound, the parties hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	All capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined in this Amendment are used herein as defined in the Registration Rights Agreement. 


 

	 	2.	Section 1(b) of the Registration Rights Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 


“(b) The Company shall file or, as may be permitted under the Securities Act, submit an initial registration statement with the Commission
under the Securities Act or with any other applicable regulatory authority in connection with its IPO on or prior to June 30, 2016.” 
  

	 	3.	This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York, without giving effect to any law or rule that would cause the laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of New
York to be applied. 

  

	 	4.	This Amendment shall become effective as of the date hereof. From and after the date hereof, all references in the Registration Rights Agreement to the Registration Rights Agreement shall be deemed to be references to
the Registration Rights Agreement as modified hereby. 

  

	 	5.	This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered is an original, but all the counterparts together constitute the same document. 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO THIRD AMENDED AND
RESTATED REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned, having obtained the required consents under the Registration Rights Agreement, have duly executed this Agreement as of the above written date. 
  


			
	ATHENE HOLDING LTD.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Zachary Jones

		 	Name: Zachary Jones
		 	Title: Chief Accounting Officer


 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THIRD
AMENDED AND RESTATED REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
No. 62487.

#### Wall Trading Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 324313-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000054502
<NAME> K N ENERGY, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
   
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          17,005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  298,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     49,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               454,824
<PP&E>                                       1,547,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                 518,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,629,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          498,616
<BONDS>                                        423,676
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,000
<COMMON>                                       151,479
<OTHER-SE>                                     368,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,629,720
<SALES>                                      1,443,174
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,443,174
<CGS>                                        1,062,062
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,308,373
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 99,716
<INCOME-TAX>                                    35,897
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             63,819
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    63,819
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
    

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.2
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Bliss
Essentials Corp. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Howard Gelfand,
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

   (1)  the registration statement fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the registration statement fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.



Date: November 12, 2003        /s/ Howard Gelfand
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Financial Officer of
                              Bliss Essentials Corp., Registrant










                                 16

<PAGE>
### NUMBERS 13
- 16
- 00 392
- CR AND 13
- 16
- 00393
- CR


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

MARCUS ESEDE ALI , A ppellant ,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

On Appeal from the County Court No. 4 of Travis County , Texas.



## ORDER OF ABATEMENT
Before Justices Rodriguez , Contreras, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam
Appellant ’ s counsel, Rickey Jones , has filed a motion requesting to withdraw as

counsel. 1 According to h is motion to withdraw, good cause exists for h im to withdraw

1 Th ese appeals are before the Court on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See T EX . G OV ' T C ODE A NN . § 73.001 (West , Westlaw through 2015 R.S. ).2

because he is now employed by the Travis County District Attorney’s Office. Counsel states that the job was offered to him after he had completed appellant’s brief, but before it was actually filed. Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of new counsel

rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State , 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.

-- Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the

app ointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate court, when faced with a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial c ourt for further proceedings consistent with this order. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appellant ’ s court

- appointed attorney should remain as appellant's counsel; and, if not, whether appellant is entitled to new appointed counsel. I f the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge appellant ’ s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall

enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed, the name, address, telephone number, email address, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be

filed w ith the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of

this order.
It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).2

D elivered and filed this t he 16 th day of February, 2017.
|  Name      of Company                             |  State      of Incorporation |
|--------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                                                   |                              |
| Kansas      City Power & Light Company             | Missouri                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| Kansas City Power & Light      Receivables Company | Delaware                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| Innovative      Energy Consultants Inc.                | Missouri                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| Gregory Acquisition      Corp.                         | Delaware                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| Great Plains Energy Services      Incorporated         | Missouri                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| KLT      Inc.                                          | Missouri                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| KLT      Energy Services Inc.                          | Missouri                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| Custom      Energy Holdings, L.L.C.                    | Delaware                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| Strategic      Energy, L.L.C.                          | Delaware                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| Strategic Receivables,      LLC                        | Delaware                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| Home Service Solutions      Inc.                       | Missouri                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| KLT Investments      Inc.                              | Missouri                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| KLT Gas Inc.                                           | Missouri                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| FAR Gas Acquisitions      Corporation                  | Colorado                          |
|                                                   |                              |
| KLT TelecomInc.                                        | Missouri                          |
|                                                   |                              |
|                                                   |                              |
No. 50427.

#### Protest 942751-G of Donald Hay et al. (Pembina).

*253Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the trial Government counsel consented to the submission of the plaintiffs’ evidence in the form of an affidavit of the owner of the automobile, which was admitted in evidence as exhibit 1. It appears therefrom that the owner of the Plymouth sedan, together with the other five plaintiffs herein, started on a vacation trip, the expenses of the trip to be shared equally among the six plaintiffs; that the owner of the automobile received no compensation for transporting the other plaintiffs; that the owner of the automobile used it in Winnipeg, Canada, for taxi purposes but before leaving the city upon the vacation trip, he obtained a temporary suspension of his taxi license for a period of 2 weeks; and that from the time the owner left the city until his return thereto, he did not conduct his usual commercial business of taxi operator either in the United States or in Canada. Section 308, Tariff Act of 1930, and article 477, Customs Regulations of 1937, provide for free entry of automobiles entering the United States temporarily for touring purposes. It was held that the evidence stands uncontradicted that the automobile was brought into the United States by the owner thereof, a nonresident, whose purpose was to use the vehicle for touring only, and that the owner’s identity and good faith in the use of the automobile while in the United States had been clearly established. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entry and make refund of all of the duties taken.