alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3972 

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 

to require the Congressional Budget Office to provide to Congress information on payments from the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust 

Fund and the Disability Insurance Trust Fund, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 19, 2024 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Mr. MANCHIN, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Budget 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to require the Congressional Budget 

Office to provide to Congress information on payments 

from the Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund 

and the Disability Insurance Trust Fund, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Our Seniors Act’’ 

5 or the ‘‘SOS Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3972 IS

1 SEC. 2. INFORMATION ON PAYMENTS FROM THE OLD-AGE 

2 AND SURVIVORS INSURANCE TRUST FUND 

3 AND THE DISABILITY INSURANCE TRUST 

4 FUND. 

5 Section 202(e)(1) of the Congressional Budget and 

6 Impoundment Control Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 602(e)(1)) 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ before ‘‘On or before 

9 February 15’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘including (A) alternative’’ and 

11 inserting the following: ‘‘including— 

12 ‘‘(i) alternative’’; 

13 (3) by striking ‘‘deficits), (B) the levels’’ and 

14 inserting the following: ‘‘deficits); 

15 ‘‘(ii) the levels’’; 

16 (4) by striking ‘‘year, and (C) a statement’’ and 

17 inserting the following: ‘‘year; and 

18 ‘‘(iii) a statement’’; 

19 (5) by striking ‘‘Such report’’ and inserting the 

20 following: 

21 ‘‘(B) Each report under subparagraph (A)’’; 

22 and 

23 (6) by adding at the end the following: 

24 ‘‘(C) Each report under subparagraph (A) shall 

25 include a comparison, expressed in graph format and 

26 included with other information in the report on the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3972 IS

1 Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund and 

2 the Disability Insurance Trust Fund, between— 

3 ‘‘(i) the amount assumed under section 

4 257(b)(1) of the Balanced Budget and Emer5 gency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (2 U.S.C. 

6 907(b)(1)); and 

7 ‘‘(ii) outlays from payments from such 

8 trust funds based on the assumption that pay9 ments would be consistent with the amounts 

10 payable from dedicated funding sources as 

11 under current law.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Case 2:05-cr-00240-GEB     Document 391     Filed 09/06/2006     Page 1 of 6

Case 2:05-cr-00240-GEB     Document 391     Filed 09/06/2006     Page 2 of 6

Case 2:05-cr-00240-GEB     Document 391     Filed 09/06/2006     Page 3 of 6

Case 2:05-cr-00240-GEB     Document 391     Filed 09/06/2006     Page 4 of 6

Case 2:05-cr-00240-GEB     Document 391     Filed 09/06/2006     Page 5 of 6

Case 2:05-cr-00240-GEB     Document 391     Filed 09/06/2006     Page 6 of 6
**Exhibit21**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**

Asof June 30, 2005, subsidiaries of the Company and the jurisdiction in whicheach company was incorporated are listed below. Unless other wise indicated,all of the voting securities of each subsidiary are owned by K-telInternational, Inc. or one of its subsidiaries.

DominionEntertainment, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-telEntertainment (CAN) Inc.

Winnipeg,Manitoba (a Canada corporation)

K-tel MarketingLimited

London,England (an England corporation)

K-telEntertainment (U.K.) Ltd.

London,England (an England corporation)

K-tel DirectLimited

London,England (an England corporation)

K-tel (Australia)Pty. Limited

Southport,Queensland, Australia (an Australian corporation)

Seminars Direct,Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel ConsumerProducts, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel Direct, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel TV, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel Video, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel DVD, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel Online, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-telEntertainment, Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

K-tel Services,Inc.

Minneapolis,Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

DominionVertriebsGmbH

Frankfurt,Germany (a German corporation)

----
exv10w41







Exhibit 10.41




July 14, 2008




Via Email

George Resta

854 St. Edmund Place

Annapolis, MD 21407




	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Re:
	 	Notice of Extension

Convertible Promissory Note dated March 1, 2008






Dear Mr. Resta,



Pursuant to paragraph “3” of the aforementioned promissory note, Ecology Coatings (the “Company)
does hereby elect to extend the term of the note until June 30, 2008. In connection therewith, the
Company has issued you an option to purchase Fifteen Thousand (15,000) shares of the Company’s
common stock. That option grant is included herein for your review and consideration. Please
execute and return at your earliest convenience.



Thank you for your time in addressing this matter.




Yours very truly,




Adam S. Tracy, Esq.

Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary



cc



Richard D. Stromback



enc (1)
'•"'\'' 

US. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

ADDISON JET MANAGEMENT, INC. 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

FDMS FAA-2012-0205 

ORDER TO RESPONDENT TO SHOW CAUSE 

.. 

... 

The Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") has filed a ~otion to Decision 

C'Motion") dated July 13, 2012. The basis for the Motion is Complainant~s.~ssertion that the 

Answer to the Complaint of Respondent Addison Jet Management, Inc. ("Respondent"), together 

with documents already submitted, establish that Respondent committed the violations with 

which it is charged. Complainant argues additionally that its proposed civil penalty of $8,149 

conforms with established guidelines and should be upheld. 

Respondent has failed to answer the Motion. 

WHEREFORE, it is ORDERED as follows: 

1. On or before August 24, 2012, Respondent shall file a response to this Order 

stating why the relief requested in Complainant's Motion should not be granted; ~d 
2 

2. Absent a full and complete response to the ordering paragraph above, Respondent 

may be sanctioned, including, but not limited to, allegations in the Complaint may be deemed 

admitted; Respondent's Request for Hearing may be dismissed; and/or a Default Judgment may 

be entered against Respondent in the fuil amount of the fine requested by the Complainant in its 

Complaint. 

Attachment - Service List 

't 

.. 
SERVJ[CE LIST 

ORIGINAL & 'ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 . 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 1 

ONE COPY 

Gerald P. Shaw, Director of Operations 

Addison Jet Management, Inc., Respondent 

7515 Lemmon Avenue 

Dallas, TX 75209 

Autumn Killingham, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office ofthe ChiefCounsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

TEL: 202-267-7728 

FAX: 202-267-5106 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S,E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2012-0205 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

... 

1 

Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, · DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Cleric,AGC-430. 

-2-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0776 LKK EFB P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 18, 2006, the court directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint. On June 21,

2006, plaintiff filed an amended complaint.

Fo purposes of the initial screening, the amended complaint states cognizable claims for

relief against defendants J. M. Briddle, S. L. Chapman, R. Gower, St. Andre, B. Wilbur, Pribble,

Von Rader, Kelsey, Weaver, C. Houghland, V. Hicks, Martinez, Bedford, Bates, Little, Doyle,

Kelley, J. J. Brown and Arnold for alleged Eighth Amendment violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). 

Accordingly, it hereby is ordered that:

1. Service is appropriate for defendants J. M. Briddle, S. L. Chapman, R. Gower, St.

Andre, B. Wilbur, Pribble, Von Rader, Kelsey, Weaver, C. Houghland, V. Hicks, Martinez,

Bedford, Bates, Little, Doyle, Kelley, J. J. Brown and Arnold.

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 66 Filed 09/08/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff 19 USM-285 forms, one summons, an

instruction sheet and one of the June 21, 2006, pleading.

3. Within 30 days from service of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice

of Submission of Documents and submit it to the court with the completed summons and USM285 forms and 20 copies of the endorsed June 21, 2006, pleading.

4. Upon receipt of the necessary materials, the court will direct the United States

Marshal to serve defendants J. M. Briddle, S. L. Chapman, R. Gower, St. Andre, B. Wilbur,

Pribble, Von Rader, Kelsey, Weaver, C. Houghland, V. Hicks, Martinez, Bedford, Bates, Little,

Doyle, Kelley, J. J. Brown, and Arnold pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without

payment of costs. 

Dated: September 7, 2006.

\john0776.svc ord - amended complaint

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 66 Filed 09/08/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0776 LKK EFB P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order

filed :

 1 completed summons form

 19 completed forms USM-285 

 20 copies of the June 21, 2006 

 Amended Complaint

Dated: 

 

 Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 66 Filed 09/08/06 Page 3 of 3
```

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Listed below are the principal subsidiaries and affiliates of Kaiser Aluminum &
Chemical Corporation, the jurisdiction of their incorporation or organization,
and the names under which such subsidiaries do business. The Company's ownership
is indicated for less than wholly owned affiliates. Certain subsidiaries are
omitted which, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not
constitute a significant subsidiary.

                                                                                    Place of
                                                                                    Incorporation
         Name                                                                       or Organization

         Alpart Jamaica Inc.(1) .......................................             Delaware
         Alumina Partners of Jamaica (partnership) (65%)...............             Delaware
         Anglesey Aluminium Limited (49%)..............................             United Kingdom
         Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation(1).......................             Delaware
         Kaiser Aluminium International, Inc.(1).......................             Delaware
         Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical of Canada Limited(1)...............             Ontario
         Kaiser Bauxite Company(1).....................................             Nevada
         Kaiser Bellwood Corporation(1)................................             Delaware
         Kaiser Finance Corporation(1) ................................             Delaware
         Kaiser Jamaica Bauxite Company (partnership) (49%)............             Jamaica
         Kaiser Jamaica Corporation(1).................................             Delaware
         Queensland Alumina Limited (20%)..............................             Queensland
         Volta Aluminium Company Limited (90%).........................             Ghana

---------------------------
(1)      Filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under the Code.
```
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed May 3, 2023. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D23-129 Lower Tribunal No. F83-9397

________________ 

### Randolph Baggett, Appellant,

vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge. Randolph Baggett, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before EMAS, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ. PER CURIAM.2

Affirmed. See Baggett v. Inch, 349 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021); Baggett v. State, 271 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Baggett v. State, 150 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290- 91 (Fla. 2003) (holding that although res judicata does not prevent a defendant from filing successive 3.800 motions raising new issues, collateral estoppel prevents a defendant from relitigating issues previously presented and decided). See also Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239, 1241 (Fla. 2018) (acknowledging that in State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018), the Florida Supreme Court abrogated Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016): “As we held in Michel, involving a juvenile homicide offender sentenced to life with the possibility of parole after 25 years, Florida's statutory parole process fulfills Graham's requirement that juveniles be given a “meaningful opportunity” to be considered for release during their natural life based upon “normal parole factors,” [Virginia v.] LeBlanc, 137 S.Ct. [1726,] 1729 (2017), as it includes initial and subsequent parole reviews based upon individualized considerations before the Florida Parole Commission that are subject to judicial review. . . .”)
##### 



COMMON SHARES INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF INDIANA IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION NO PAR VALUE FULLYPAID AND NONASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES, NO PAR
VALUE, OF IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION NATIONAL CITY BANK SECRETARY




---



##### 



IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION A STATEMENT, IN FULL, OF THE RELATIVE RIGHTS, INTERESTS, PREFERENCES
AND RESTRICTIONS OF THE CLASS OF SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE
WILL BE FURNISHED BY THE CORPORATION TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON WRITTEN
REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE. SUCH REQUEST MAY BE MADE TO THE CORPORATION
OR THE TRANSFER AGENT. The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this
certificate,. shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations:
TEN COM as tenants in common
TEN ENT  as tenants by the entireties
JT TEN  as joint tenants with right of
Survivorship and not as tenants            Act
in common (State)
Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in            the above list
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT  Custodian
(Cust) (Minor) under Uniform Gifts : to Minors Signature(s) Guaranteed NOTICE            THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAM(S) AS WRITTEN UPON
NOTICE: THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT On ANY CHANGE WHATEVER. By THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN
ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH
MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE
MEDALLION PROGRAM), PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-l5. THIS CERTIFICATE ALSO EVIDENCES AND ENTITLES THE HOLDER HEREOF TO CERTAIN
RIGHTS AS SET FORTH IN THE RIGHTS AGREEMENT BETWEEN IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION (THE
COMPANY) AND IRWIN UNION BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, DATED AS OF MARCH 1. 2001 (THE RIGHTS
AGREEMENT), THE TERMS OF WHICH ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AND A COPY OF
WHICH IS ON FILE AT THE PRINCIPAL OFFICES OF THE COMPANY. UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES, AS
SET FORTH IN THE RIGHTS AGREEMENT, SUCH RIGHTS WILL BE EVIDENCED BY SEPARATE CERTIFICATES
AND WILL NO LONGER BE EVIDENCED BY THIS CERTIFICATE. THE COMPANY WILL MAIL TO THE HOLDER
OF THIS CERTIFICATE A COPY OF THE RIGHTS AGREEMENT, AS IN EFFECT ON THE DATE OF MAILING,
WITHOUT CHARGE PROMPTLY AFTER RECEIPT OF A WRITTEN REQUEST THEREFOR. UNDER CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES SET FORTH IN THE RIGHTS AGREEMENT, RIGHTS ISSUED TO, OR HELD BY, ANY PERSON
WHO IS, WAS OR BECOMES AN ACQUIRING PERSON OR AN AFFILIATE OR ASSOCIATE THEREOF (AS SUCH
TERMS ARE DEFINED IN THE RIGHTS AGREEMENT), WHETHER CURRENTLY HELD BY OR ON BEHALF OF
SUCH PERSON OR BY ANY SUBSEQUENT HOLDER. SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Business Reports: Deposits by OTC Endpoint

To view a deposit by OTC Endpoint report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, click Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Business Reports, click Deposits by OTC Endpoint. The Deposits by OTC 

Endpoint parameters page appears.

3. Enter your search criteria.

• Select the Organization, required

• Select the ALC (Agency Location Code)

• Enter the From: and To: Voucher Date range

• Enter the From: and To: Deposit Total range

• Click Yes or No for Report With Children

• The date range for Voucher Date cannot exceed 15 months.

• Click Yes for Report With Children to generate a report that contains data for the 

selected OTC Endpoint as well as all of the lower level OTC Endpoints. 

• Click No for Report With Children to generate a report that contains data only for 

the selected OTC Endpoint.

4. Click an OTC Endpoint to initiate the report. The Deposits by OTC Endpoint preview page 

appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Deposits by OTC Endpoint Report Preview Page

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• TGA denotes a deposit processing OTC Endpoint.

• CHK denotes a check capture OTC Endpoint.

• M denotes a mapped accounting code; an open lock denotes access permission; 

and a closed lock denotes no access permission.

• CDC denotes card processing OTC Endpoint.

5. Under Export as, you have the following options:

• Select PDF, Excel or Word format

• Click Download

Or

• Click Print PDF Report

• Deposits with a voucher date older than five years does not display on the report but 

they may be viewed from the Historical Reports page (Home>Reports>Historical 

Reports).

• Unconfirmed Foreign Check items entered with a Country of Deposit value of Other

does not display values in the Voucher Amount column.

Click Previous to return to the previous page.

Application Tips

Application Tips

Additional Button
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 10
                                                                      ----------

                         FIFTH INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT
                         -----------------------------

           WHEREAS, J. Crew Group, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the J. Crew
Group, Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan");

           WHEREAS, Section 4.12 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be
amended by the Committee at any time, with exceptions not here material;

           WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan, subject to
shareholder approval, to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved
for issuance upon exercise of options awarded under the Plan;

           WHEREAS, all defined terms used herein shall have the meaning set
forth in the Plan unless specifically defined herein;

           NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, subject to shareholder
approval, as follows:

           1.  The reference to "1,810,000 shares of Common Stock" in the first
sentence of Section 4 of the Plan shall be replaced with a reference to
"1,910,000 shares of Common Stock".

July 24, 2000
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

REX CHAPPELL,

Plaintiff,

v.

C.K. PLILER et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:04-cv-1183 TLN DAD P

ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested 

appointment of counsel.

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require 

counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 

U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the 

voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 

1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). 

The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s 

likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in 

light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. See Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 

1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). Circumstances 

common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not 

Case 2:04-cv-01183-TLN-DB Document 87 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

establish exceptional circumstances that would warrant a request for voluntary assistance of 

counsel. In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of 

counsel (Doc. No. 80) is denied.

Dated: September 25, 2015

DAD:9

chap1183.31

Case 2:04-cv-01183-TLN-DB Document 87 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 2
DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT FACILITY US DEPT ofTRANSPORTATION 1200 NEWJERSEY AVE SE ROOM W12-140 WASHINGTON, DC 20590 DOCUMENT 2012-0350 Dear Committee members, I am a FAA certified, private pilot with 400 hours and I typically fly 40 hours eachyear. This letter is in support ofthe FAAproposal to exemptrecreational pilots from being required to optain 3'rd class physical examx from FAA AMEs as nowrequired under FAR 61.23. The proposal would allowthe exemption for private and recreational pilots who are limited to flying a 180 HP aircraft or less, 4 seats orless, and to only fly daylight VFR. These limitations restrict the flying to fun only purposes. Night flying, IFRflights, and other business-related flights would still require a Class lll exam. Research has shownthat LSA pilots ( exempt from a FAAmedical) are not at risk for medical emergencies while flying. flying for fun, using the pilot's owndetermination ifhe/she is physically fit has shownit does notpresent any adverse medical risk for pilots. Also this will reduce the cost offlying for about 1000,000 pilots by eliminating the expensive FAA requiredphysical exam. Therefore, I endorse this recommendation and hope the FAA will approve this proposal.

# ;{~~"-**20577~~y** 413, Reeds Spring, Mo. 65737 417-272-8190 tinbender@centurytel.net