alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7178

MICHAEL T. WATKINS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; GEORGE ALLEN, Governor; ALEXANDER L. TAYLOR, JR.; RICHARD E.

TRODDEN; STEPHEN W. HAYNIE; ARLINGTON COUNTY,

VIRGINIA; MICHAEL FORTUNE, Lieutenant; JOHN

SARAFINAS, Police Officer; LEONARD HURD,

Police Officer; ARLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION

CENTER; D. F. WARE, Deputy Sheriff; K. C.

LANE, Deputy Sheriff; TERI OSWALD; MICHAEL

PINSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (CA-97-432-3)

Submitted: December 11, 1997 Decided: December 31, 1997

Before HALL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Michael T. Watkins, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Watkins v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-97-432-3 (E.D. Va. Aug.

11, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6905

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

PAUL A. LEE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

Chief District Judge. (CR-89-273, CA-95-76-5)

Submitted: March 31, 1997 Decided: April 9, 1997

Before HALL, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul A. Lee, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. McWilliams, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Lee, Nos. CR-89-273; CA-95-76-5 (N.D.W. Va.

May 24, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Before the First Division,

November 10, 1954

No. 58496.

protest 167751-K (Detroit).

#### P. W. Drittler *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *E. Dillingham, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 555), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1805 as pickets was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING

Appellate case name: Nai (“Jack”) Wang and Wang Investment Houston Partnership v. Jose 

Gonzalez, All American Demolition, LLC, and Nelson Equipment, Ltd.

Appellate case number: 01-11-00434-CV

Trial court case number: 2009-26214

Trial court: 295th District Court, Harris County, Texas

Date motions filed: January 29, 2013, and January 31, 2013

Party filing motion: Jose Gonzalez, All American Demolition, LLC, and Nelson 

Equipment, Ltd.

It is ordered that the motions for rehearing are granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of: Justices Keyes, Massengale, and Brown

Date: May 24, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 20, 2007, from 11:30 a.m. ET. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7979. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10 (a) (2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, March 20, 2007, from 11:30 a.m. ET via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write Sallie Chavez, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Sallie Chavez. Ms. Chavez can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

                    The agenda will include:                     *Various IRS issues*.                 

Dated: February 20, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E7-3424 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT
      10.2

    


    SECOND
      ADDENDUM TO BRIDGE LOAN AGREEMENT DATED MARCH 31, 2008 BETWEEN SINGLE TOUCH
      SYSTEMS INC. (FKA HOSTING SITE NETWORK, INC.) AND SINGLE TOUCH INTERACTIVE,
      INC.

    


    This
      Addendum is made and entered into as of the 27th
      day of
      June 2008. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this
      Addendum shall have the meaning given to them as in the Bridge Loan
      Agreement.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants contained herein and
      intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto agree as
      follows:

    


    1. The
      first
      WHEREAS clause of the Bridge Loan Agreement is amended to read as
      follows:

    


    “WHEREAS,
      Lender and Borrower have agreed upon certain of the terms and conditions of
      a
      merger (the “Merger”) and related transactions (collectively, the
“Transactions”) which is expected to be completed and closed upon no later than
      July 31, 2008 (the “Completion Date”);” 

    


    2. All
      other
      terms of the Bridge Loan Agreement shall continue with full force and
      effect.

    


    3. This
      Addendum may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall
      be
      deemed to be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute
      one
      and the same agreement.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum has been executed by the Parties as of the date
      first above written:

    


    
      	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH INTERACTIVE, INC.

            
	 
	
              By:  /s/
                Anthony Macaluso   

            
	
              Name: Anthony
                Macaluso

            
	
              Title: Chief
                Executive Officer

            
	 
	 
	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH SYSTEMS INC.

              (FKA
                HOSTING SITE NETWORK, INC.).

            
	 
	
              By:  /s/
                Scott Vicari    

            
	
              Name: Scott
                Vicari

            
	
              Title: President
Before the First Division,

July 1, 1942

No. 47344.

#### Protest 711597-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Plaintiff’s witness testified that a javelin (exhibit 1) is an implement of sport, consisting of a wooden shaft with an iron or steel head, 8J4 feet over all, and of a certain required weight. It is used, he stated, in track and field meets and is thrown for distance, being grasped between the fingers and thumb at the point of balance, and after a short run is thrown from a point behind a line. No testimony was offered as to the disci involved, but plaintiff’s counsel suggested that judicial notice be taken of dictionary descriptions of same. The court found that inasmuch as paragraph 1502, “aside from specific provisions for boxing gloves and ice and roller skates, relates only to balls and equipment used in connection with balls,” javelins and disci do not fall within its terms *directly.*It was also found that a designation such as manufactures of wood, or of which wood is the component material of chief value, is such an enumeration as bars the operation of the similitude clause (paragraph 1559). On the record the protest was therefore overruled. *Mason*v. *Robertson*(139 U. S. 624) cited.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9335]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3518]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Report No. 2805]


Petition for Reconsideration of Action in Rulemaking Proceeding

February 2, 2007.
    A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's 
Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published 
pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is 
available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, 
SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy 
contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). 
Oppositions to this petition must be filed by March 16, 2007. See 
Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies 
to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing 
oppositions has expired.
    Subject: In the Matter of Reallocation of 30 MHz of 700 MHz 
Spectrum (747-762/777-792 MHz) from Commercial Use (RM-11348).
    Assignment of 30 MHz of 700 MHz Spectrum (747-762/777-792 MHz) to 
the Public Safety Broadband Trust for Deployment of a Shared Public 
Safety/Commercial Next Generation Wireless Network.
    Number of Petitions Filed: 1.

Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3518 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
SCWC-12-0000836

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

MAYDENE I. SIMMONS,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,

vs.

AQUA HOTELS AND RESORTS, INC., a Foreign Profit Corporation;

KAI MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLC, dba KAUAI BEACH RESORT,

a Domestic Limited Liability Company; 

JOHN DOES 1-10 and JANE DOES 1-10,

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP-12-0000836; CIV. NO. 11-1-0059)

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Petitioners/Defendants-Appellees’ application for writ of

certiorari filed on November 15, 2013, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 23, 2013

Clayton Ikei and 

Jerry Chang, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

for petitioners

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

Stefan Reinke and

Malia Schreck, /s/ Simeon A. Acoba, Jr.

for respondent

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-12-0000836

23-DEC-2013

10:08 AM
Case No. 7,857a.

#### KITTLE v. SCHNEIDER.

[See 30 Fed. 690.]
Exhibit 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual Report of Israel Bank of  Agriculture  Ltd. (the
"Bank") on Form 20-F for the period  ended  December  31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  We, Lea
Patalovsky,  General  Manager  of the Bank,  and Yakov  Cohen,  Chief  Financial
Officer of the Bank,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.

June 26, 2005

Lea Patalovsky
General Manager


/s/ Lea Patalovsky
-------------------------

Yakov Cohen
Chief Financial Officer


/s/ Yakov Cohen
-------------------------
No. 43998.

#### Protests 726520-G, etc., of American Import Co. et al. (Philadelphia, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 9 (Tuesday, January 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1722]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-358]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-8268-4]


Proposed Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement Under Section 
122(g) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 
Liability Act, as Amended, 42 U.S.C. 9622(g), PCB Treatment Inc. 
Superfund Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 122(i) of the Comprehensive 
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended 
(CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed 
administrative settlement for recovery of past response costs 
concerning the PCB Treatment Inc. Superfund Site located at 2100 
Wyandotte Street, Kansas City, Missouri, and 45 Ewing Street, Wyandotte 
County, Kansas with the following settling party: Cargill, Inc. The 
settlement requires Cargill, Inc. to pay to the Hazardous Substance 
Superfund $47,844.97. The settlement includes a covenant not to sue 
Cargill, Inc. pursuant to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a). 
For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, 
the Agency will receive written comments relating to the settlement. 
The Agency will consider all comments and may modify or withdraw its 
consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or 
considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, 
improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any comments received 
will be available for public inspection at the EPA Region VII office 
located at 901 N. 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before February 15, 2007.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlement is available for public inspection 
at the EPA Region VII office, 901 N. 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas, 
Monday through Friday, between the hours of 7 a.m. through 5 p.m. A 
copy of the proposed settlement may be obtained from the Regional 
Hearing Clerk, 901 N. 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas, (913) 551-7567. 
Comments should reference the PCB Treatment, Inc. Superfund Site, EPA 
Docket No. CERCLA-07-2007-0008 and should be addressed to Audrey Asher, 
Senior Assistant Regional Counsel, 901 N. 5th Street, Kansas City, 
Kansas 66101.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Asher at (913) 551-7255.

    Dated: December 21, 2006.
John B. Askew,
Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 
VII.
 [FR Doc. E7-358 Filed 1-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6479
TALIB D. SHABAZZ, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus HAMLETT, Lieutenant; SHIFLETT, Unit Manager; SUSSEX II STATE PRISON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-03-192-3) Submitted: June 18, 2004 Decided: July 16, 2004 Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Talib D. Shabazz, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Talib D. Shabazz appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shabazz v. Hamlett , No. CA-03-192-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS ENGRAHM,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1290 GEB GGH

vs.

COUNTY OF COLUSA et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Previously pending on this court’s law and motion calendar for September 29,

2005, was defendants’ request for independent mental examination. Geoffrey Evers appeared on

behalf of plaintiff. Ralph Nevis appeared for defendants. 

Having reviewed the joint stipulation and heard oral argument, IT IS ORDERED

that defendants’ September 8, 2005 motion to compel mental examination of plaintiff is denied.

DATED: 10/4/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH/076

Engrahm1290.ime.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01290-GEB-GGH Document 56 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 1
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT VICTORIA SZURANT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-282 ) JOSEF AARONSON, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 21, 2018. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Donna Padar Berlin, Judge. Victoria D. Szurant, pro se. Allison M. Perry of Florida Appeals, P.A. Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, SLEET, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
#### Commonwealth *v.*Wagner, Appellant.

November 17, 1924:

Per Curiam,

Appellant was convicted with appellant in No. 80, April Term, 1925, (Com. v. Neff), in which an opinion has this day been filed affirming the conviction. The record shows that appellant was seen on Piper’s Hill with other appellants, but not at the scene of the affray; there is no evidence to connect him with the offenses of which he was convicted; we must therefore sustain his appeal.

Judgment reversed and reeord remitted with instructions to discharge appellant.

Similar judgments were rendered in the eases of

> Commonwealth v. Sliter, appellant, April T., 1925, No. 84;

> Commonwealth v. Koontz, appellant, April T., 1925, No. 89.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-88,825-01

EX PARTE GREGORY LOPEZ, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR2012-396-2 IN THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM COMAL COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual

abuse of a young child and sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals

affirmed his conviction. Lopez v. State, No. 03-13-00852-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 1, 2015) (not

designated for publication). 

Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to notify him that his conviction had been

affirmed. Appellate counsel filed an affidavit. Based on that affidavit, the trial court has entered
2

findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to notify Applicant that his

conviction was affirmed. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956

S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). 

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Third Court of Appeals in cause number 03-13-

00852-CR that affirmed his conviction in cause number CR2012-396 from the 207th District Court

of Comal County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30

days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: September 12, 2018

Do not publish