alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
INVT     InvestAmerica,  Inc.

#148  -  4664  Lougheed  Highway,  Burnaby,  B.C.  V5C  5T5   Canada   Tel (604)
473-9331   Fax  (604)  473-9334

Winjoy  Services  Centre  Limited                             October  20,  2000
Suite  61,  Grosvenor  Close
Shirley  Street
Nassau,  New  Providence
Bahamas

Dear  Sirs:

Reference  is  made  to our agreement of November 22, 1999 pursuant to which you
acquired  preferred  stock  of  INVT  which is convertible into 7,604,980 common
shares  of  INVT  (the  "Shares").

This  confirms  that  you have agreed that the following sale restrictions shall
apply  during  the  5  year  period  following  November  22, 2000 (the "Lock-Up
Period"):

1.     Unless  specifically  authorized  in writing by the Board of Directors of
INVT  (or  an executive officer authorized by the Board) you shall not sell more
than  the  following  number of Shares during the following specified intervals,
subject  to  the  following  rights  of  cumulation  and  early  termination:

     Year  1  -  3  of  Lock-Up  Period:     .15%  (ie. 11,407 Shares) per month
     Year  4  -  5  of  Lock-Up  Period:     .30%  (ie. 22,815 Shares) per month

2.     The  above  monthly  rate  of  sale shall be cumulative for 6 months (ie.
Shares which become eligible for sale in any month may be sold during that month
or in any of the 5 months following).  Any Shares which are not sold during such
6  month  period  may  not  be  sold  until  expiry  of  the  Lock-Up  Period.

3.     If  during the Lock-Up Period INVT stock trades for $10 or more per share
for  60  consecutive  days  at  an  average  volume of 250,000 shares per day or
greater,  the  above  sale restrictions shall be terminated at the conclusion of
such  60  day  period.

You  agree  that  if  you  violate  the  terms  of  this agreement, INVT will be
entitled, without limitation, to obtain injunctive relief against you as well as
any other legal and equitable remedies available, and you will be liable for any
and  all  legal  fees  incurred  by  INVT  in  pursuing  such  remedies.

Please  acknowledge  your  agreement  to  the  foregoing  terms  by  signing and
returning  a  copy  of  this  letter.

Yours  very  truly,

INVESTAMERICA,  INC.          ACKNOWLEDGED  AND  AGREED  by
                              Winjoy  Services  Centre  Limited
By: /s/ signed                By: /s/ signed
Douglas  Smith,
President  and  CEO
67,38/$7,21$1'352326('25'(55( 

),1$/027,21)256800$5<-8'*0(17

























































%(1-$0,1%:$*1(5

8QLWHG6WDWHV$WWRUQH\

'$9,'76+(//('<

$VVLVWDQW86$WWRUQH\

,6WUHHW6XLWH

6DFUDPHQWR&$



$WWRUQH\VIRUWKH86'HSDUWPHQWRIWKH,QWHULRU%XUHDXRI/DQG0DQDJHPHQW

86'HSDUWPHQWRI$JULFXOWXUH)RUHVW6HUYLFH

,17+(81,7('67$7(6',675,&7&2857

($67(51',675,&72)&$/,)251,$

3,75,9(575,%(1$7,9(&2$/,7,21

)250(',&,1(/$.(+,*+/$1'6

'()(16(028176+$67$

%,25(*,21$/(&2/2*<&(17(56$9(

0(',&,1(/$.(&2$/,7,21DQG

0(',&,1(/$.(&,7,=(16)2548$/,7<

(19,5210(17

    3ODLQWLIIV

   Y

%85($82)/$1'0$1$*(0(17

81,7('67$7(6'(3$570(172)7+(

,17(5,2581,7('67$7(6)25(67

6(59,&(81,7('67$7(6'(3$570(17

2)$*5,&8/785(

DQG&$/3,1(&25325$7,21

    'HIHQGDQWV











































&2162/,'$7('&$6(6

12&9-$0$&

12&9-$0$&

67,38/$7,21$1'25'(5

5(),1$/027,21)256800$5<

-8'*0(17

6XEMHFWWRWKH&RXUW¶VDSSURYDODVSURYLGHGEHORZWKHSDUWLHVVWLSXODWHDVIROORZV

3ODLQWLIIVDUHSUHSDULQJDILQDOPRWLRQIRUVXPPDU\MXGJPHQWRQWKHDGPLQLVWUDWLYHUHFRUG

7KHSDUWLHVVWLSXODWHWKDWLIWKH&RXUWGHQLHVWKHSODLQWLIIV¶PRWLRQVXPPDU\MXGJPHQWRQWKH

DGPLQLVWUDWLYHUHFRUGVKRXOGEHHQWHUHGLQIDYRURIWKHGHIHQGDQWVDQGQRFURVVPRWLRQE\WKH

GHIHQGDQWVLVUHTXLUHG 

Case 2:04-cv-00956-JAM-AC Document 123 Filed 02/11/16 Page 1 of 2
67,38/$7,21$1'352326('25'(55( 

),1$/027,21)256800$5<-8'*0(17

























































7KHVFKHGXOHIRUEULHIVDQGKHDULQJVKDOOEHDVIROORZV

3ODLQWLIIV¶PRWLRQDQGVXSSRUWLQJPHPRUDQGXP )HEUXDU\

'HIHQGDQWV¶RSSRVLWLRQ    0DUFK

3ODLQWLIIV¶UHSO\     0DUFK

+HDULQJ      $SULODWSP

'DWHG)HEUXDU\ 5HVSHFWIXOO\VXEPLWWHG

%(1-$0,1%:$*1(5

8QLWHG6WDWHV$WWRUQH\

/s/ David T. Shelledy

 '$9,'76+(//('<

$VVLVWDQW86$WWRUQH\

'DWHG)HEUXDU\ /s/ Deborah Ann Sivas

 '(%25$+$116,9$6

$WWRUQH\IRU3ODLQWLIIV

'DWHG)HEUXDU\ /s/ Thomas Sansonetti

 7+20$66$1621(77,

PROPOSED ORDER 

 ,7,66225'(5('

 'DWHG    V-RKQ$0HQGH]BBBBBBB

 +21-2+1$0(1'(=

Case 2:04-cv-00956-JAM-AC Document 123 Filed 02/11/16 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 11

                   K-TEL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                    (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

                For the years ended June 30, 1996, 1995 and 1994


                                                                   1996        1995        1994
                                                                 -------     -------     -------
Primary earnings per share -
<S>                                                             <C>         <C>         <C>
Weighted average number of issued shares outstanding               3,729       3,711       3,680

Effect of Stock Incentive Plan                                        --          --         142
                                                                 -------     -------     -------

Shares outstanding used to compute primary earnings per share      3,729       3,711       3,822
                                                                 =======     =======     =======

Net Income (Loss)                                                $  (745)    $(2,483)    $   376
                                                                 =======     =======     =======

Primary earnings per share                                       $  (.20)    $  (.67)    $   .10
                                                                 =======     =======     =======

Fully diluted earnings per share -

Weighted average number of shares used
for primary earnings per share                                     3,729       3,711       3,822

Effect of Stock Incentive Plan                                        --          --          --
                                                                 -------     -------     -------

Shares outstanding used to compute
fully diluted earnings per share                                   3,729       3,711       3,822
                                                                 =======     =======     =======

Net Income(Loss)                                                 $  (745)    $(2,483)    $   376
                                                                 =======     =======     =======

Fully diluted earnings per share                                 $  (.20)    $  (.67)    $   .10
                                                                 =======     =======     =======
</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. WR-89,123-01 AND WR-89,123-02

EX PARTE DANIEL ALBERTO MONTOYA, Applicant

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. W14-31191-R(A) AND W14-31192-R(A) 

IN THE 265TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant filed these applications for writs of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded them to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. According

to the record, the trial court held an evidentiary hearing on May 9, 2019, but the transcript of the

hearing was not forwarded to this Court. Under Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal

Procedure, a reporter is required to transcribe a hearing within fifteen days of its conclusion and then

to immediately forward the transcript to the district clerk in the county of conviction. Id. at § 3(d). 

After receiving the transcript, the district clerk is required to forward it, among other things, to this

Court. Id.; see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4).
2

The district clerk shall serve the reporter in Applicant’s case with a copy of this order and

then either forward to this Court the transcript of the evidentiary hearing or certify in writing that the

reporter has not transcribed the hearing. The district clerk shall comply with this order within thirty

days from the date of this order.

Filed: April 9, 2020

Do not publish
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2006/C 275/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----
Exhibit 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual Report of Israel Bank of  Agriculture  Ltd. (the
"Bank") on Form 20-F for the period  ended  December  31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  We, Lea
Patalovsky,  General  Manager  of the Bank,  and Yakov  Cohen,  Chief  Financial
Officer of the Bank,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.

June 27, 2006

Lea Patalovsky
General Manager


/s/ Lea Patalovsky
----------------------

Yakov Cohen
Chief Financial Officer


/s/ Yakov Cohen
----------------------
Supporting Local Jobs

Advanced Technology 

# B&W: WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTIONS
SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK



## Waste-to-Energy (WtE) is a “Clean, Reliable, Renewable source of Energy.”
— EPA


## WtE generates electricity “with less environmental impact than almost any source of electricity.”
—EPA

SOURCE: EPA Municipal Solid Waste combustion produces lower CO 2 emissions than fossil fuel sources Curbing CO 2 Emissions Air Emissions (Pounds per Megawatt Hour)

Oil 1,672 Natural

Gas 1,135 Coal 2,249 MSW 1,016 Powering Community Homes

CLEANER EMISSIONS *  COMBUSTION EFFICIENCY

B&W’s cutting-edge WtE technology sets the standard for highest efficiency and lowest emissions in the U.S. 

# 200+ **FULL TIME**  **JOBS** *****

*FACILITY #2 ONLY
 INCLUDES DIOXINS AND FURANS, ACID GASES AND HEAVY METALS *AT CAPACITY 

# 85,000 * 

# HOMES 1,795,000 * 

# TONS OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE

*AT CAPACITY

= 2,500 FL Homes



### 90–99% REMOVAL 

### 99%
EXHIBIT 99.1


Date: November 19, 2002


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
FrontLine Capital Group (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and exchange commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I Scott H. Rechler, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     as of September 30, 2002 (the last date of the period covered by the
     Report).


                     By: \s\ Scott H. Rechler
                         -------------------------------------------------------
                         Scott H. Rechler, President and Chief Executive Officer
                         (Principal Executive Officer)
May 23, 1962

No. 66793. — Suit 5068.

#### United States *v.*Rt. Rev. Msgr. John F.

C.D. 2228 reversed February 13,1962. C.A.D. 791.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAROLD LEE BRITTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0472 LKK GGH P

vs.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. Plaintiff requests that the court substitute the names of the successors in office as the

named defendants in this action. “When a public officer is a party to an action in his official

capacity and during its pendency...ceases to hold office, ... the officer’s successor is automatically

substituted as a party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1). As plaintiff sues the California Department of

Corrections Director and Chairman of the Board of Prison Terms in their official capacity for

prospective injunctive relief, the current office holders are automatically substituted in as

defendants. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court modify the names of

the defendants in the court’s file as follows: Jeanne S. Woodford, current California Department

of Corrections Director, is substituted in for former CDC Director Alameida, and Margarita E.

Case 2:04-cv-00472-LKK-GGH Document 29 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Perez, current Chairwoman of the Board of Prison Terms, is substituted in for former BPT

Chairman Hepburn. Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d)(1).

DATED: 6/14/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

brit0472.25(d)

Case 2:04-cv-00472-LKK-GGH Document 29 Filed 06/14/05 Page 2 of 2
AMERICAN EXPRESS CERTIFICATE COMPANY
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

City of Minneapolis

State of Minnesota

Each of the undersigned as a director of American Express Certificate Company, a
face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940, hereby constitutes and appoints Paula R. Meyer, Brian J. McGrane, David K.
Stewart, Teresa J. Rasmussen, and H. Bernt von Ohlen or any one of them, as his
or her attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign for him or her in his or her name,
place and stead any and all registration statements and amendments thereto (with
all exhibits and other documents required or desirable in connection therewith)
that may be prepared from time to time in connection with said Company's
existing or future face-amount certificate products - whether pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Investment Company Act of 1940
or otherwise - and periodic reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K
required pursuant to provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any
necessary or appropriate filings with states or other jurisdictions, and grants
to any or all of them the full power and authority to do and perform each and
every act required or necessary or appropriate in connection with such
signatures or filings.

Signed on this 22nd day of February, 2005


/s/ Rodney P. Burwell
--------------------------
    Rodney P. Burwell


/s/ Jean B. Keffeler
--------------------------
    Jean B. Keffeler


/s/ Thomas R. McBurney
--------------------------
    Thomas R. McBurney


/s/ Karen M. Bohn
--------------------------
    Karen M. Bohn
Unassociated Document


    EXHIBIT
      10.2

    


    FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO 

    SHARE
      PURCHASE AGREEMENT

    


    


    This
      First Amendment (“First Amendment”) is made as of this 9th
      day of
      July, 2008, by and between ICC WORLDWIDE, INC. (formerly, Torbay Holdings,
      Inc.), a Delaware corporation (the “Issuer” or the “Company”) and The Melanie S.
      Altholtz Irrevocable Trust which is located at 1800 Second St, Ste 758,
      Sarasota, FL 34236 (“Buyer”). 

    


    WITNESSETH:

    


    WHEREAS,
      the Issuer and the Buyer entered into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Original
      Agreement”) dated December 3, 2007 in which the Issuer sold preferred stock and
      common stock to the Buyer; and

    


    WHEREAS,
      the Issuer and Buyer now seek to amend the Original Agreement to further change
      the Put Option as part of the consideration for a loan being made to the Company
      by two other investors which are requiring preference in the availability of
      cash to pay back the loan. 

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, the Issuer and the Buyer hereby amend the Original Agreement as
      follows: 

    


    1.
      Paragraph 2.1 is deleted in its entirety and replace as follows:

    


    2.1 Starting
      in the third calendar quarter of 2008, the Company will set aside for the
      purchase from the Buyer of shares of Series C Preferred Stock three (3%) of
      its
      positive net income before income taxes which exceeds $50,000 as reported in
      the
      Company’s Form 10-QSB or Form 10-KSB as required to be filed by SEC regulations
      for the calendar quarter for which the election by Buyer is made.

    


    2.
      Paragraph 4.14 is added: 

     

    4.14
       Call
      Option.
      At any
      time and from time to time, the Company may buy back up to 50% of the total
      Series C stock held by the Buyer on the date of the signing of this amendment
      at
      the liquidation price as stated in the designation of the Series C stock. Upon
      tender of the cash to purchase the Series C stock, Buyer may not convert the
      Series C stock which is the subject of the tender, to common stock 

    


    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment has been executed by the parties hereto
      the day and year first above written.

    


    
      	
              Buyer:

            	
              Issuer:

            
	 	 
	
              /s/
                Adam Altholtz

            	
              /s/
                Richard K Lauer

            
	
              Adam
                Altholtz, Trustee

            	
              Richard
                K Lauer, President

            
	
              The
                Melanie S. Altholtz Irrevocable Trust 

            	
              ICC
                Worldwide, Inc.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSHUA PHILLIPS,

Petitioner,

v.

SCOTT KENAN, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV S 04-1257 GEB GGH P

APPLICATION/REQUEST

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Respondent’s application for a 30-day extension of time

in which to file a response in this matter is hereby GRANTED. Respondent’s response is due on

July 18, 2005.

DATED: 6/24/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

phil1257.eot06

Case 2:04-cv-01257-GEB-GGH Document 20 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Airman Basic BRANSON C. RUSSELL

United States Air Force

ACM S32188

09 October 2014

Sentence adjudged 9 October 2013 by SP CM convened at Sheppard Air

Base, Texas . Military Judge: Matthew S. Ward (sitting alone).

Approved S entence: Bad

- conduct discharge, c onfinement for 6 months and

forfeiture of $1010.00 pay per month for six months

.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Captain Thomas A. Smith

.

Appellate Counsel for the Unite d States: Major Daniel J. Breen and Mr.

Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire

.

Before

SARAGOSA

, HECKER , and TELLER

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is subject to editorial correction before final release

.



### PER CURIAM :

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occ urred. Article 66(c),

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed , 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000).

Accor dingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Brian Lee Christman,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-0884 FCD PAN P

vs. Order

California Department of

Corrections, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff requests an extension of time to conduct discovery

because he is in administrative segregation pending transfer and

he is not allowed to have legal materials while housed there. 

The court has made no schedule and so there is no date by

which discovery must be completed.

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-00884-FCD-EFB Document 46 Filed 01/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, plaintiff’s October 28, 2005, request is

denied.

So ordered.

Dated: January 5, 2006. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00884-FCD-EFB Document 46 Filed 01/06/06 Page 2 of 2
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

July 15, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Additional Information for Elevated Productions, LLC (Docket FAA-2015-1693) Regarding Why 

Granting the Petition Will Benefit the Public. 

Dear Sir or Madam:

The Petitioner intends to produce picture and video content. If the petitioner does not have the 

option of using the Petitioner’s UA, the only other way to obtain the aerial footage is by using manned 

aircraft which pose a danger to the pilot as well as individuals on the ground. There are no pilots on 

board the UA and due to the small size of the UA, there is less risk posed to the public on the ground in 

case of an emergency. Additionally, the UA has multiple motors while most manned aircraft have only 

one engine.

Manned airplanes and helicopters produce great amounts of noise pollution disrupting the quiet 

enjoyment of private property of the public on the ground. UA are much quieter and will not disrupt the 

public as much as manned aircraft; thus, the public will benefit from a reduction in noise pollution.

In addition to the noise pollution reduction, engine or turbine powered aircraft produce exhaust 

which affects the environment while the UA of the petitioner are electric and do not produce any 

emission. The environment and the public are benefited by the use of UA.
2

UA use batteries for power which are not as flammable and explosive as 100LL or Jet A. If there 

was an emergency where the UA crashed, there is less chance of individuals being injured from an 

explosion or fire. UA also use smaller propellers than manned helicopters which will cause far less 

damage in the case of a crash than the “grenading” that typically happens during a manned helicopter 

crash.

Lastly, the UA will be operated at lower altitudes than manned aircraft. Thus, the public benefits 

because the danger of a mid-air collision is lessened

If I can be of any assistance to further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me

at (561)222-6979 or at my email jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________

Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 158 Filed 09/12/08 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 158 Filed 09/12/08 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 158 Filed 09/12/08 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 158 Filed 09/12/08 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 158 Filed 09/12/08 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 158 Filed 09/12/08 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 158 Filed 09/12/08 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 158 Filed 09/12/08 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 158 Filed 09/12/08 Page 9 of 9