alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Waiver of Withdrawal Charge for Terminal Illness Rider



 Brighthouse Life Insurance Company of NY 

[200 Park Avenue 
 New York, New
York   10166] 
 WAIVER OF WITHDRAWAL CHARGE FOR TERMINAL ILLNESS RIDER 

This Rider forms a part of the Contract to which it is attached and is effective as of the Issue Date. In the case of a conflict with any
provision in the Contract, the provisions of this Rider will control. This Rider is irrevocable and its provisions will remain in part of the Contract until the earlier of the Annuity Date or the date the Contract terminates. This Rider amends
the Contract as follows: 
 The following provisions are added to the Contract: 

WAIVER OF WITHDRAWAL CHARGE FOR TERMINAL ILLNESS 

After the first Contract Anniversary, the Withdrawal Charge attributable to such withdrawal will be waived upon a withdrawal if: 

 

	1.	 you are terminally ill and not expected to live more than 12 months; 



	2.	 a Qualified Physician certifies to your illness and life expectancy; 



	3.	 you had not been diagnosed with the terminal illness as of the Issue Date; 



	4.	 you have been the Owner continuously since the Issue Date or you are a Spousal Beneficiary who continues the
Contract under the Spousal Continuation During Accumulation Period Option; and 



	5.	 you were less than the Maximum Terminal Illness Rider Issue Age specified on the Contract Schedule on the
Issue Date. 


 In the case of Joint Owners, this Rider applies to either Joint Owner. If the Owner is not a natural
person, this Rider applies to the Annuitant provided the Annuitant has continuously been the Annuitant since the Issue Date. 
 Qualified
Physician is any person duly licensed and legally qualified to diagnose and treat sickness and injuries. A physician must be providing services within the scope of his or her license. A Physician may not be a member of the Owner’s immediate
family. Immediate family members include the Owner’s spouse, children, parents, grandparents, grandchildren, siblings and in-laws. 

Brighthouse Life Insurance Company of NY has caused this Rider to be signed by its [Secretary]. 

 

	
	[
	
	



]
	 [Christine M. DeBiase

	 Secretary]



  
 ML-1216 (01/01/02)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEWIS JENKINS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1656 FCD GGH P

vs.

STEVEN CAMBRA, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file and serve an opposition to the

respondents’ answer. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s May 11, 2005 application for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Petitioner shall file and serve an opposition to the respondents’ answer on or

before May 26, 2005.

DATED: 5/17/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

jenk1656.111(2)

Case 2:04-cv-01656-FCD-GGH Document 16 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 1
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.2   PATIENT PORTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


     Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Thomas Hagan, Acting Chief Financial Officer of Patient Portal Technologies,
Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a
review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007
of the Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a)[15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.


Dated:  8/10/2007            /s/ THOMAS HAGAN
                             -----------------------
                             Thomas Hagan
                             Chief Financial Officer








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 58010.

protest 218038-K (New York).

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

*460Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the one case of earthenware, number 3258/6, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAVIER RAIGOZA, )

) 2:04-cv-1208-GEB-KJM

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER

v. )

)

ARAMARK CORPORATION; ARAMARK )

UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL GROUP, )

INC.; MICHAEL BRODEUR; BILL )

VERVALIN; KERM HANSEN; JACOB )

VERVALIN, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Since this action settled on February 22, 2006, the trial

scheduled to commence on March 28, 2006, is vacated. However, the

Order to Show Cause hearing scheduled to commence at 3:30 p.m. on

March 20, 2006, remains unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 1, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01208-GEB -KJM Document 109 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MARCUS JAMES SMITH,

Petitioner,

v.

CLAUDE E. FINN, Warden,

Respondents.

NO. CIV S-04-1442 DFL GGH P

ORDER DENYING REQUEST

TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL

ANSWER

Respondents seek leave to file a supplemental answer to the petition for writ of habeas

corpus. This matter has been submitted since October 28, 2004. The undersigned does not need

the parties to brief the question of whether or not the court has subject matter jurisdiction based

on the recent decisions of In re: Dannenberg, 34 Cal. 4th 1061, 23 Cal. Rptr.3d 417 (2005), and

Sass v. California Bd. of Prison Terms, No. Civ. S-01-0835 MCE KJM P, ___ F. Supp. 2d ___

[2005 WL 1406100] (E.D. Cal. June 15, 2005). It is sufficient that this court takes judicial notice

of these cases. Accordingly, respondents’ request to file a supplemental answer to the petition

for writ of habeas corpus is denied. 

DATED: 8/11/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

Magistrate Judge

smit1442.po.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01442-JKS-GGH Document 9 Filed 08/12/05 Page 1 of 1
1 The Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 09-1996

___________ Demetrius Ramon Akkard, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Jason Jones; Dollie Ann-Marie * Simmons; Donny Brian Dahl; Sgt. * [UNPUBLISHED] Jason McDonald, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: January 14, 2010 Filed: January 20, 2010

___________ Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Demetrius Akkard appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action asserting failure-to-prot ect claims against employees of the Miller County Correctional Facility in their individual and official capacities. Upon careful review, we find no basis for reversal. See Norman v. Schuetzle , 585 F.3d-2- 1097, 1101 (8th Cir. 2009) (no s howing of failure to protect where prison official was not aware inmate was at riskto be assaulted by other in mate); Brockinton v. City of Sherwood , 503 F.3d 667, 674 (8th Cir. 2007) (suit against governmental actor in official capacity is treated as suit ag ainst governmental entity itself; because governmental entity cannot be held vicariously liable under § 1983 for its agents’ acts, plaintiff must identify governmental policy or custom that caused plaintiff’s injury to recover from governmental entity under § 1983). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS OF**

**CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Paul K. Laikind, ChiefExecutive Officer of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

 

1. The Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periodcovered by the Report.

 
|   | Date: May 2, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Paul K. Laikind                              |
|--------|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|
|   |                   |   | Paul K. Laikind, Ph.D.,*Chief Executive Officer* |

 

I, John W. Beck, ChiefFinancial Officer of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:

 

1. The Quarterly Reporton Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periodcovered by the Report.

 
|   | Date: May 2, 2008 | By:    | /s/ John W. Beck                               |
|--------|------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|   |                   |   | John W. Beck, C.P.A.,*Chief Financial Officer* |

 

A signed original ofthese certifications has been provided to Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. andwill be retained by Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc. and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

These certifications arebeing furnished solely to accompany this quarterly report pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated byreference into any filing of Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc., whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

----
No. 50444.

Suit 4505

#### United *States*v. *Samuel Dunkel & Co., Inc.*

Abstract 49838 reversed July 3, 1945. C. A. D. 317.
### Hydrogeology of Picacho Basin, south-central Arizona

By: Donald R. PoolRob Carruth**Wesley D. Meehan

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wri004277

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

The hydrogeology of Picacho Basin was studied to define the stratigraphy, basin structure, physicaland hydraulic properties of the basin sediments, and predevelopment and postdevelopment conditions ofground-water flow as of 1985. The study area includes about 900 square miles and contains a sedimentfilledasymmetric graben. The greatest sediment thickness occurs along the east margin of the graben.Basin sediments contain the principal water-bearing units and are separated into lower, middle, and upperunits. The lower unit is several thousand feet thick and contains a conglomerate facies and a playa faciesthat contains a thick evaporite sequence. The middle and upper units contain alluvial and playa facies thatare as much as 1,500 feet thick. Ground water occurs in lower and upper aquifer systems separated by amiddle confining unit that comprises the playa facies of the three units. Hydraulic properties andcompressibility of the middle and upper units are much greater than those of the lower unit. Vertical-headgradients exist, and vertical flow occurs within and between the aquifer systems.

Early development of surface-water supplies resulted in increased recharge through deep percolationof irrigation water. Later development of the ground-water supplies resulted in extensive water-leveldeclines, changes in the direction of ground-water flow, removal of water from storage, aquifercompaction, land subsidence, and earth fissures. Dewatering of pore spaces in the upper unit has been theprimary source of water; however, as much as 80 percent of the water derived from storage in the Eloyarea has resulted from compaction of pore spaces.

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
No. 66811.

#### J. W. Lewis *v.*United States,

protests 58/11993, etc. (Laredo).

*469Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of face brick similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Bunker Hill Brick & Supply, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 95, C.D. 2240), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KENNETH MILLS, No. CIV S-04-1649-DFL-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 1, 2004, the court directed plaintiff to submit either an

application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or the filing fee within 30 days. That order was

served by the Clerk of the Court on plaintiff at the following address, which was plaintiff’s

address of record as of the date of service: 

San Joaquin County Jail

999 West Matthews Road

French Camp, CA 95231

That order was returned as undeliverable on October 13, 2004. 

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01649-DFL -CMK Document 10 Filed 10/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On March 3, 2005, plaintiff submitted a document to the court. That document

reflects that plaintiff changed addresses. In the interest of justice, On October 6, 2005, the court

issued an order construing the March 3, 2005, document as a notice of change of address to the

following:

Metropolitan State Hospital

11401 S. Bloomfield Avenue

Norwalk, California, 90650

The October 6, 2005, order also provided plaintiff an additional opportunity to comply with the

court’s initial September 1, 2004, order, and warned plaintiff that failure to comply may result in

dismissal of this case. The October 6, 2005, order was also returned as undeliverable. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 20 days after the date of

service of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to

comply with court orders and rules; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order, along with copies of

the court’s September 1, 2004, and October 6, 2005, orders on plaintiff at both of the following

addresses:

Metropolitan State Hospital

11401 S. Bloomfield Avenue

Norwalk, California, 90650

San Joaquin County Jail

999 West Matthews Road

French Camp, CA 95231

DATED: October 20, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01649-DFL -CMK Document 10 Filed 10/21/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM J. BIGGS AND BETTY BIGGS,

Defendants.

CIV S-04-1263-FCD-PAN

MODIFIED SCHEDULING ORDER

For good cause shown the November 9, 2005 SCHEDULING

ORDER is modified by extending the pretrial dates as follows:

September 11, 2006 Discovery cutoff

October 26, 2006 Deadline to file dispositive motions

March 8, 2007, at 11:00 a.m. Pretrial Conference (Ctrm. 25)

June 5, 2007, at 9:00 a.m. Trial (Ctrm. 2)

DATED: April 24, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01263-FCD-GGH Document 48 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 1
```
Drug Use Among Youth: No Simple Answers to Guide Prevention (Letter
Report, 12/29/93, GAO/HRD-94-24).

Although the use of illegal drugs and alcohol among adolescents has
declined from the peak levels of the late 1970s and early 1980s, it
remains widespread.  The many social ills that accompany drug and
alcohol use remain a serious public policy concern throughout American
society.  This report (1) describes the prevalence of drug and alcohol
use among various groups of young people; (2) describes the relationship
between drug and alcohol use; (3) identifies risk factors most related
to drug and alcohol use by youth; (4) identifies and describes federal
programs aimed at drug risk factors; and (5) on the basis of GAO's
analysis, describes what set of policies might constitute a reasonable
prevention/intervention strategy.

--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------

 REPORTNUM:  HRD-94-24
     TITLE:  Drug Use Among Youth: No Simple Answers to Guide Prevention
      DATE:  12/29/93
   SUBJECT:  Data collection operations
             Drug abuse
             Narcotics
             Controlled substances
             Alcohol abuse
             Drug treatment
             Federal programs
             Minors
             Juvenile delinquency
             Surveys
IDENTIFIER:  NIDA National Household Survey on Drug Abuse
             NIDA High School Senior Survey
             National Longitudinal Survey of Youth
             Dept. of Education Drug-Free Schools and Communities Program
             HHS High Risk Youth Program
             Community Youth Activity Block Grant
             HHS Drug Abuse Prevention Program for Runaway and Homeless 
             Youth
             Health Services to the Homeless Project Grant
             DOJ Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Program
             Head Start Program
             Social Services Block Grant
             
************************************************************************

We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.

See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or 
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 10, 2022.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-59

Lower Tribunal No. F20-12118

________________

Jason A. Johnson,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An appeal conducted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge.

Jason A. Johnson, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and HENDON, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
## 'Q{?&~k

# ~a9- 

# ce[?3

, Appendix 

### Pacific Wings, L.L.C. Provision for Essential Air Service at KAMUELA (MUE), HAWAII KAHULUI (OGG) Service Calculation of Annual Subsidy Needed

2 rountrips M-F, 1 roundtrip Saturday, 1 roundtrip Sunday

Aircraft type Cessna208B Seats perdeparture 9 Average completion factor: 98.0% Departures 1,223 ' Block hours: 775

OGG-MUE Other revenue Total operating revenue Operating expense: Flying Operations Fuel and Oil Aircraft and Hull Insurance Maintenance Intoaircraft and leaseexpense Direct Expense Indirects Total Operating Expense Return at 5% ofoperating expense Total Economic Cost Annual Subsidy Need @ 98%



# • Passengers 1,000 Average fare

$88,10
No. 61332.

protests 104836-K, etc. (New York).

#### Art E. Weiss Co., Inc., and Rietmann Pilcer Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fox skins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388) or *Sam Forwand Co.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 232, C. D. 1829), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 3.1.2**

**CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT**

**OF**

**CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION**

**OF**

**KREISLER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION**

**AS OF**

**MARCH 10, 1969**

The Certificate of Incorporation of the Delaware Corporation [Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation] is hereby amended by striking out Paragraph 4 of Article “EIGHTH” thereof and substituting in lieu of saidParagraph 4 of Article “EIGHTH” the following new Paragraph: 

“4. In lieu of taking any permissive orrequisite action by vote at a meeting of stockholders, any such vote and any such meeting may be dispensed with if either all of the stockholders entitled to vote upon the action at any such meeting shall consent in writing to any such corporateaction being taken or if less than all of the stockholders entitled to vote upon the action at any such meeting shall consent in writing to any such corporate action being taken; provided, that any such action taken upon less than the unanimouswritten consent of all stockholders entitled to vote upon any such action shall be by written consent of the stockholders holding at least the minimum percentage of the votes required to be cast to authorize any such action under the provisions ofthe General Corporation Law; and, provided, that prompt notice be given to all stockholders entitled to vote on any such action of the taking of such action without a meeting and by less than unanimous written consent.”