alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Stephen K. Gartside, Jr., certify that:

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Evolving Systems, Inc.;

2. Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

 
| /s/ STEPHEN K. GARTSIDE, JR.           |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen K. Gartside, Jr.               |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
X
                             EXHIBIT 24

                          POWER OF ATTORNEY

    We, the undersigned officers and directors of Ionics, Incorporated (the
"Company"), hereby severally constitute Arthur L. Goldstein and Stephen
Korn, and each of them, to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities
indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, and any and all amendments to such
Annual Report, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be
signed by our attorneys to such Annual Report and any and all amendments
thereto.

    Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.

     Signature                      Title                    Date


/s/William L. Brown                 Director               March 29, 1996 
William L. Brown

/s/Arnaud de Vitry d'Avaucourt      Director               March 29, 1996 
Arnaud de Vitry
   d'Avaucourt

/s/Lawrence E. Fouraker             Director               March 29, 1996 
Lawrence E. Fouraker

/s/Samuel A. Goldblith              Director               March 29, 1996 
Samuel A. Goldblith

/s/Arthur L. Goldstein              Chairman of the Board  March 29, 1996 
Arthur L. Goldstein                 of Directors, Chief
                                    Executive Officer and  
                                    President (Principal
                                    Executive Officer)

/s/Kachig Kachadurian               Director               March 29, 1996 
Kachig Kachadurian

/s/William E. Katz                  Director               March 29, 1996 
William E. Katz

/s/Robert B. Luick                  Director               March 29, 1996 
Robert B. Luick

/s/John J. Shields                  Director               March 29, 1996 
John J. Shields

/s/Carl S. Sloane                   Director               March 29, 1996 
Carl S. Sloane

/s/Mark S. Wrighton                 Director               March 29, 1996 
Mark S. Wrighton

/s/Allen S. Wyett                   Director               March 29, 1996 
Allen S. Wyett

101/
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN LEE CHRISTMAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0884 FCD EFB P

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner without counsel seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. Plaintiff requests the court to schedule a settlement conference. See Local Rule 16-270.

The must hold a settlement conference in a case unless otherwise ordered by the court, on

objection of a party or for other good cause. Local Rule 16-270(a). 

Nothing in the record suggests defendants are prepared for settlement negotiations.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s July 3, 2006, request for a settlement conference is denied.

So ordered.

Dated: August 29, 2006.

\chri0884.deny settlement conf

Case 2:04-cv-00884-FCD-EFB Document 79 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the annual report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
      to
      the best of his knowledge:





i.
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





ii.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will
      be
      retained by the Company and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff upon
      request.





Date:
                May 15, 2008
            /s/
                John ChenJohn
                ChenDirector
                and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,180
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,022
<ALLOWANCES>                                       267
<INVENTORY>                                      8,561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,510
<PP&E>                                          11,769
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,933
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,096
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,933
<SALES>                                         27,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,140
<CGS>                                           10,226
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (238)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,305
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,462
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,843
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,843
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
(C. D. 250)

#### A. Hirsch & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

United States Customs Court, Third Division

(Decided November 16, 1939)

*Puckhafer, Rode & Rode (George J. Puckhafer*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Webster J. Oliver,*Assistant Attorney General *(Daniel G. McGrath,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Before Cline, Evans and Keefe, Judges; Keefe, J., not participating

Cline, Judge:

In this suit against the United States, the plaintiff claims that the collector of customs at the port of New York erred in assessing duty at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under the pro*272visions of section 304 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 on the ground that ■the merchandise was not legally marked at the time of importation.

At the trial the case was submitted on the record without the introduction of evidence other than that shown by the official papers. The report of the collector reads in part as follows:

> ■The 25 bales officially reported as not marked in a conspicuous place as required by law, were in consequence assessed with marking duty amounting to 10 percent under section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

> Note appraiser’s report (attached to invoice) in answer to collector’s query as .to the marking condition of the mdse, in question.

The report of the appraiser referred to reads as follows:

> Ten of the 35 bales of sheep skins on entry 338352 were properly marked •“Egypt.” The remaining 25 bales when landed did not bear any marking on '■the *outside*to indicate country of origin, hence were reported by this office as mot legally marked.

> The importer later called the inspector’s attention to the fact that the letters TPYGE could be faintly discerned through the covering, and under the supervision of the inspector the covering of such bales was removed and reversed, ■thus showing the word Egypt.

It appears, therefore, that the bales were not marked on the outside when the goods arrived but were stenciled on the inside. The marking was not visible until the cover was removed. There is nothing in the record to show that the skins were marked to show the country of origin.

In the case of *Closset & Devers*v. *United States,*Abstract 37655, the importation consisted of Java tea packed in cases. It was found when the cases were opened that the word “Java” was stamped on the inside of the cases but the outside of the cases bore no marking showing the country of origin. The court found that the marking on the inside of the cases was insufficient to comply with the provisions of section 304. On the authority of the decision cited the protest in this case is overruled. Judgment will be entered in favor of the defendant.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. (the Company) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gail P. Seneca, Chairman of the Board of Directors and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: August 9, 2005     By: /s/ GAIL P. SENECA         Gail P. Seneca    Chief Executive Officer    (Principal Executive Officer)       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toLuminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and will be retained by Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jaclyn, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), the
undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: September 27, 2005           /s/ ROBERT CHESTNOV
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Robert Chestnov, President
                                    (Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: September 27, 2005           /s/ ANTHONY CHRISTON
                                    --------------------------------------
                                    Anthony Christon,
                                    Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Jaclyn, Inc. and will be retained by Jaclyn, Inc. and forwarded
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONELL THOLMER, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1368 GEB CMK P

vs.

PLILER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file his objections to the August 17,

2006 findings and recommendations. In his request, plaintiff states that he failed to file

objections or a request for an extension in a timely manner because he fell very ill with

pneumonia and “valley fever.” Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's October 2, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file his

objections to the August 17, 2006 findings and recommendations. 

DATED: October 17, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01368-GEB -CMK Document 25 Filed 10/17/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 12(a).  COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


                           IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                 Year Ended December 31,
(In Thousands)                         2000       1999       1998       1997       1996
<S>                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
INCLUDING INTEREST ON DEPOSITS

Earnings:
     Earnings before income taxes    $ 59,342   $ 52,637   $ 50,857   $ 42,178   $ 37,287
     Fixed charges from below
                                       93,534     59,491     63,986     49,055     41,625
     Earnings                        $152,876   $112,128   $114,843   $ 91,233   $ 78,912

Fixed charges:
     Interest expense                $ 93,534   $ 59,491   $ 63,986   $ 49,055   $ 41,625

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                                         1.63       1.88       1.79       1.86       1.90

EXCLUDING INTEREST ON DEPOSITS

Earnings:
     Earnings before income taxes    $ 59,342   $ 52,637   $ 50,857   $ 42,178   $ 37,287
     Fixed charges from below
                                       40,719     34,271     40,617     29,092     23,893
     Earnings                        $100,061   $ 86,908   $ 91,474   $ 71,270   $ 61,180

Fixed charges:
     Interest expense, excluding
          interest on deposits       $ 40,719   $ 34,271   $ 40,617   $ 29,092   $ 23,893


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
                                         2.46       2.54       2.25       2.45       2.56
</TABLE>
No. 65490.

#### Cohn-Hall-Marx Co., Div. of United Merchants *&*Mfrs., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/20707 and 60/20708 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of woven silk fabrics in the piece, valued at more than $5.50 per pound, bleached, colored, dyed, or printed, not chiefly used for stenciling purposes in screen-process printing, Jacquard-figured, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 23, 2012 

d0416 

Order 

 

April 23, 2012 

143427(42)(44) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143427 

 COA: 296730 

ROMANDO LEWIS, Wayne CC: 09-020831-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

____________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion to file a supplemental brief is GRANTED. The 

motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 24, 2011 order is considered, and it is 

DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3350]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-200-018]


Rockies Express Pipeline LLC; Notice of Negotiated Rate

February 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 14, 2007, Rockies Express Pipeline LLC 
(REX) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to be effective February 15, 
2007:

Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 22
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 24

    REX stated that a copy of this filing has been served upon all 
parties to this proceeding, REX's customers, the Colorado Public 
Utilities Commission and the Wyoming Public Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e4a2a1b6a7ab8a888d8a81b79194948b9690a482819687ca838b92"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="44020116070b2a282d2a21173134342b363004222136276a232b32">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3350 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We have issued our report dated March 27, 2006, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsincluded in the Annual Report of Xanser Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the RegistrationStatements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-101996, 333-87446, 333-83970, 333-83968, 333-68558, 333-34496,333-60195, 333-22109, 333-14071, 333-14069, 333-14067, 333-08727, 333-08725, 333-08723, 33-58981,33-54027 and 33-41295).GRANT THORNTON LLPDallas, Texas