alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Brian
Chaiken, the principal financial officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., certify
that:
 
 1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.;
 
 2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.           The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 (b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based upon such evaluation; and
 
 (c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants' fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:
 
 (a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 (b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Dated:  May
      14, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Brian
      ChaikenBrian
      ChaikenChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
```

[108th Congress Public Law 73]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ073.108]

[[Page 117 STAT. 891]]

Public Law 108-73
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To extend for six months the period for which chapter 12 of title 11 of 
  the United States Code is reenacted. <<NOTE: Aug. 15, 2003 -  [H.R. 
                                2465]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Family Farmer 
Bankruptcy Relief Act of 2003.>> 

SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 11 USC 101 note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Family Farmer Bankruptcy Relief Act 
of 2003''.

SEC. 2. SIX-MONTH EXTENSION OF PERIOD FOR WHICH CHAPTER 12 OF TITLE 11, 
            UNITED STATES CODE, IS REENACTED.

    (a) Amendments.--Section <<NOTE: 11 USC 1201-1208, 1221-1231.>> 149 
of title I of division C of Public Law 105-277 (11 U.S.C. 1201 note) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``July 1, 2003'' each place it appears and 
        inserting ``January 1, 2004''; and
            (2) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) by striking ``December 31, 2002'' and inserting 
                ``June 30, 2003''; and
                    (B) by striking ``January 1, 2003'' and inserting 
                ``July 1, 2003''.

    (b) Effective Date.--The <<NOTE: 11 USC 1201 note.>> amendments made 
by subsection (a) take effect on July 1, 2003.

    Approved August 15, 2003.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2465 (S. 1323):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):
            June 23, considered and passed House.
            July 31, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 10/6/2023 1

Enjoining a Water-District Annexation 

for Want of Section 5 Preclearance 

Thelma Area Neighborhood Corporation v. 

Evergreen Underground Water Conservation District 

(Edward C. Prado, W.D. Tex. 5:01-cv-1191) 

A district judge enjoined an election to annex territory to a waterconservation district, because the election had not been precleared 

pursuant to section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. The election was canceled and held three months later than originally scheduled, and annexation failed. 

Subject: Ballot measures. Topics: Section 5 preclearance; 

enjoining elections; ballot measure. 

An organization filed a federal complaint against a water district on December 

28, 2001, in the Western District of Texas to challenge a February 2, 2002, election to annex the southern part of Bexar County, claiming that the election 

had not yet received preclearance pursuant to section 5 of the Voting Rights 

Act.1 With its complaint, the plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order.2

Judge Edward C. Prado set the case for hearing on January 3, 2002.3 Following the hearing, Judge Prado agreed to stay the case until January 14, two 

days before early voting was to begin, to see if preclearance would be granted.4

Because preclearance had not been granted by January 14, Judge Prado enjoined the election.5

 Following the cancelation of the election, Judge Prado dismissed the case on January 25.6

1. Docket Sheet, Thelma Area Neighborhood Corp. v. Evergreen Underground Water 

Conservation Dist., No. 5:01-cv-1191 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2001) (D.E. 1); Temporary Restraining Order, id. (Jan. 14, 2002), D.E. 8; see Voting Rights Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89-110, 

§ 5, 79 Stat. 437, 439, as amended, 52 U.S.C. § 10304 (requiring preclearance of changes to 

voting procedures in jurisdictions with a certified history of discrimination). 

On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court declined to hold section 5 unconstitutional, but the 

Court did hold unconstitutional the criteria for which jurisdictions require section 5 preclearance. Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013). 

2. Docket Sheet, supra note 1 (D.E. 2). 

3. Order, Thelma Area Neighborhood Corp., No. 5:01-cv-1191 (W.D. Tex. Dec. 28, 2001), 

D.E. 3. 

Judge Prado was elevated to the court of appeals on May 5, 2003, and he retired on April 

2, 2018. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc. 

gov/history/judges. 

4. Order, Thelma Area Neighborhood Corp., No. 5:01-cv-1191 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 3, 2002), 

D.E. 6. 

5. Temporary Restraining Order, supra note 1. 

6. Order, Thelma Area Neighborhood Corp., No. 5:01-cv-1191 (W.D. Tex. Jan. 25, 2002), 

D.E. 13; see Jerry Needham, Water District Delays Annexation Election, San Antonio ExpressNews, Jan. 23, 2002, at 8B. 
Enjoining a Water-District Annexation for Want of Section 5 Preclearance 

2 Federal Judicial Center 10/6/2023 

Annexation failed in a May 4 election.7

7. See Jerry Needham, Water Management at Issue in 2 Votes, San Antonio Express-News, 

May 5, 2002, at 8B.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 10596 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

RENE BARRIENTES , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 129

- 11

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rene Barrientes pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine . Included in the calculation of his offense level
was a two

- level enhancement for possession of a firearm pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) and a two

- level enhancement for importation of methamphetamine pursuant to § 2D1.1(b)(5)

. The district court overruled

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 31, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-10596 Document: 00514012902 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2017No. 16

- 10596

2 Barrientes’s objections to the enhancements and sentenced him to 360 months of imprisonment and four years of supervised release. On appeal, Barrientes argues that the district court erred in imposing the enhancement in § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a firearm because he personally did not possess a firearm and he had no knowledge that his codefendants possessed a firearm . He also argues that the distri ct court erred in imposing the enhancement in § 2D1.1(b)(5) for importation of methamphetamine because did not know that the methamphetamine was imported. He concedes that this court has previously rejected both arguments, but respectfully requests that w e revisit our precedent. Barrientes ’s arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Aguilera

Zapata , 901 F.2d 1209, 1215 (5th Cir. 1990), and United States v. Serfass , 684 F.3d 548, 552 (5th Cir. 2012) , respectively

. In Aguilera

- Zapata , we held that
the enhancement in § 2D1.1(b)(1) applies when a codefendant’s possession of a firearm during the offense was reasonably foreseeable. 901 F.2d at 1215. In Serfass , 684 F.3d at 552, we held that the enhancement in § 2D1.1(b)(5) applies when the offense involved the importation of methamphetamine regardless of whether the defendant knew of that importation. Accordingly, the Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brie f is DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-10596 Document: 00514012902 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/31/2017
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Lloyd J. Shulman, certify that:

|  
|--
|1.
|  
|2.
|  
|3.
|  
|4.

|   
|---
|(a)
|   
|(b)
|   
|(c)
|   
|(d)

|  
|--
|5.

|   
|---
|(a)
|   
|(b)

Date: October 6, 2011

|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ LLOYDJ. SHULMANLloyd J. ShulmanPresidentChief Executive Officer



---
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: December 27, 2007By:
    
    /s/ S. Trezevant Moore, Jr.S. Trezevant Moore, Jr.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Report on Form 10-Q/A, Amendment No. 1  to the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Registrant) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2009 (as amended, the Report), I, Chris Dick, Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Registrant as of the
dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Registrant for the periods presented.


|      |                   |                                                              
|----- | ----------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------
|      |                   |                                                              
|Date: | March
    2, 2009 |                                                              
|      |                   | Chris Dick                                                   
|      |                   | Chief Operating Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of
|      |                   | Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.                                  

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, James A. Yost, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company. /s/ James A. YostJames A. YostVice President, Finance and Chief Financial OfficerJune 9, 2004
 41
01.01
No. 61813.

#### Halsey Import Company *v.*United States,

protest 311600-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
**EXHIBIT 23****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:     Form S-8, Nos. 2-36778, 2-56410, 33-30530, and 333-101091 pertaining to theLong Term Stock Incentive Plan and predecessor stock plans, and outstandingeffective registration statements on Form S-16 included in certain such S-8filings;     Form S-8, No. 33-56369, pertaining to the JP Teamshare Plan and GuaranteeThrift Savings Plan and Trust;     Form S-8, Nos. 33-64137, 333-109090, and 333-127845 pertaining to theNon-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan;     Form S-4, No. 333-130226 ofLincoln National Corporation pertaining to theproposed business combination between Lincoln National Corporationand Jefferson-Pilot Corporation;of our reports dated March 10, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements andschedules of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, Jefferson-Pilot Corporation management’s assessment ofthe effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, included in this Annual Report(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 159 (Friday, August 16, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 50137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20126]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8423]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition

    Determinations: ``Dena'inaq' Huch'ulyeshi: The Dena'ina Way of 
Living''
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Dena'inaq' Huch'ulyeshi: The Dena'ina Way 
of Living,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Anchorage Museum, Anchorage, Alaska, from on or about September 15, 
2013, until on or about January 12, 2014, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 9, 2013.
Lee A. Satterfield,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-20126 Filed 8-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ Zachary H. PashelZachary H. PashelPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Antoine N. Watie,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-1289 FCD PAN P

vs. Order

Thomas L. Carey, et al.,

Respondents.

-oOoOctober 11, 2005, petitioner requested an extension of time

to file and serve a reply. Good cause appearing, petitioner’s

request is granted and time is extended until November 1, 2005. 

No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of

manifest injustice. 

So ordered.

Dated: October 25, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01289-FCD-CHS Document 38 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE SPITTAL, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 2:04-cv-1198-GEB-DAD-PS

)

v. )

)

JAY SCHENIRER, et al., )

)

Defendants. ) ORDER

)

On December 13, 2005, Plaintiff filed motions for

reconsideration and recusal. The motion for recusal is denied. 

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is construed as a motion

under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). “There are four

grounds upon which a Rule 59(e) motion may be granted . . .,”

none of which Plaintiff’s motion satisfies. Turner v. Burlington

Northern Santa Fe R. Co., 338 F.3d 1058, 1063 (9th Cir. 2003). 

Therefore, Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 11, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 50 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 50 Filed 01/12/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 46695.

#### Protests 993588-G, etc., of Seaboard Lumber Sales Co., Ltd. (Boston).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protests were sustained to that extent.
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 and
Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427
 
 I, Tammy
Lynn McNabb, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Welwind Energy International
Corp.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting the occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
      May 20, 2008
              
              /s/ Tammy
      Lynn McNabbTammy
      Lynn McNabb
                Principal
      Executive Officer