alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7119

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-262-A; CA-04-635) Submitted: December 23, 2004 Decided: January 7, 2005 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lloyd George Maxwell seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his “New Rules Notice of Motion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [2000]”. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Maxwell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, while we grant his motion to file a supplemental informal brief, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. Additionally, we construe Maxwell’s notice of appeal and informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. SeeUnited States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 540 U.S. 995 (2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive- 3 - § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence that would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the petitioner guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Maxwell’s claims do not satisfy either of these conditions. Therefore, we decline to authorize Maxwell to file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES


                                                                 Percentage
                                                                 of Voting
                                                   Place of      Securities
                    Name                         Organization      Owned
--------------------------------------------     ------------    ----------

Significant subsidiaries of the company:

  Acme Brick Company                               Delaware         100%
  American Tile Supply, Inc.                       Delaware         100%
  Justin Brands, Inc.                              Delaware         100%
     d/b/a Justin Boot Company
     d/b/a Nocona Boot Company
     d/b/a Tony Lama Company, Inc.
     d/b/a Chippewa Shoe Company
  Justin Management Company                        Delaware         100%
     d/b/a Justin Management Company
     d/b/a Northland Publishing Company, Inc.

  All other subsidiaries are omitted from this list because they do not,
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, constitute a significant
subsidiary.  All wholly-owned subsidiaries are included in the consolidated
financial statements.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIMAS O'CAMPO, 

CIV. S-04-1171-DFL-CMK 

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER RE DISPOSITION AFTER

 NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

HOLLYWOOD ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION dba HOLLYWOOD

VIDEO-PARADISE #5968; STANLEY

C. MINASIAN, and DOES 1

through 10, 

Defendants. 

 /

The court has been advised by Scottlynn J. Hubbard, IV

Esq., that this action has been settled. Therefore, it is not

necessary that the action remain upon the court's active

calendar. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 

1. That counsel file settlement/dismissal documents, in

Case 2:04-cv-01171-DFL-CMK Document 21 Filed 07/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160, no later

than August 22, 2005, and,

2. That all hearing dates previously set in this matter

are vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: 7/22/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01171-DFL-CMK Document 21 Filed 07/25/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[House Report 108-284]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

108th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    108-284

======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR THE RECOMMITTAL OF THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY 
     H.R. 2115, FLIGHT 100--CENTURY OF AVIATION REAUTHORIZATION ACT

                                _______
                                

 September 24, 2003.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart of Florida, from the Committee on Rules 
                        submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 377]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 377, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides that upon adoption of the rule, the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 2115, the Flight 100--
Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act, shall be recommitted 
to the conference committee.

                                

```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John F. Burke, Chief Executive Officer of Annuity and Life Re
(Holdings), Ltd. (the Company), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that (1) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2004 (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
(2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: November 8, 2004
    
    /s/ John F. Burke

Name: John F. BurkeTitle: Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit23.1**

**CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued ourreport dated August 15, 2006,accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule included in theAnnual Report of K-tel International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended June30, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report inthe Registration Statements of K-tel International, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No.333-65755 effective November 25, 1987, File No. 333-28815 effective June 9,1997, File No. 333-65755 effective October 15, 1998, File No. 333-74471effective March 16, 1999, File No. 333-31272 effective February 28, 2000, andFile No. 333-39022 effective June 9, 2000).
|                   | /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP |   |
|------------------------|------------------------|--------|
|                   |
|                   |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota |
| September 12, 2006     |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO CANODY,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1168 FCD KJM P

vs.

SCOTT KERNAN, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner inmate proceeding pro se, has filed this application for

a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01168-FCD-KJM Document 12 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 8, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. Respondent’s September 8, 2004 motion to dismiss is granted.

DATED:September 8, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01168-FCD-KJM Document 12 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:04-cv-00476-JAM -KJM Document 22 Filed 06/21/06 Page 1 of 5Case 2:04-cv-00476-JAM -KJM Document 22 Filed 06/21/06 Page 2 of 5Case 2:04-cv-00476-JAM -KJM Document 22 Filed 06/21/06 Page 3 of 5Case 2:04-cv-00476-JAM -KJM Document 22 Filed 06/21/06 Page 4 of 5Case 2:04-cv-00476-JAM -KJM Document 22 Filed 06/21/06 Page 5 of 5
```

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Listed below are the principal subsidiaries of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical
Corporation, the jurisdiction of their incorporation or organization, and the
names under which such subsidiaries do business. Certain subsidiaries are
omitted which, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not
constitute a significant subsidiary.

                                                                            Place of
                                                                            Incorporation
         Name                                                               or Organization
         ----                                                               ---------------
         Alpart Jamaica Inc. .............................................. Delaware
         Alumina Partners of Jamaica (partnership)......................... Delaware
         Anglesey Aluminium Limited........................................ United Kingdom
         Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation.............................. Delaware
         Kaiser Aluminium International, Inc............................... Delaware
         Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical of Canada Limited.................. Ontario
         Kaiser Bauxite Company............................................ Nevada
         Kaiser Bellwood Corporation....................................... Delaware
         Kaiser Finance Corporation ....................................... Delaware
         Kaiser Jamaica Bauxite Company (partnership)...................... Jamaica
         Kaiser Jamaica Corporation........................................ Delaware
         Queensland Alumina Limited........................................ Queensland
         Volta Aluminium Company Limited................................... Ghana
```
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 128595 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128595 COA: 256623 Wayne CC: 87-005567 NANCY KING, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 7, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).

p1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

GRACE LAWRENCE ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 vs. ) 

 ) Civil Action No. 02-CV-4440 

TRANS UNION, LLC ) 

 and ) 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK OF COURT: 

 Kindly enter the appearance of John Soumilas, Esquire, on behalf of Plaintiff in the 

above-captioned matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. 

BY: ____________________________ 

 JAMES A. FRANCIS, ESQUIRE 

 MARK D. MAILMAN, ESQUIRE 

 JOHN SOUMILAS, ESQUIRE 

 Land Title Building, 19th Floor 

 100 South Broad Street 

 Philadelphia, PA 19110 

 (215) 735-8600 

Dated: June 9, 2003 

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 15 Filed 06/09/2003 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

GRACE LAWRENCE ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 vs. ) 

 ) Civil Action No. 02-CV-4440 

TRANS UNION, LLC ) 

 and ) 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, John Soumilas, Esquire, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Entry of Appearance was served by regular mail on:

 Timothy P. Creech, Esquire 

Satzberg, Trichon, Kogan 

& Wertheimer, P.C. 

1818 Market Street, 30th Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

 

FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. 

BY: ____________________________ 

 JAMES A. FRANCIS, ESQUIRE 

 MARK D. MAILMAN, ESQUIRE 

 JOHN SOUMILAS, ESQUIRE 

 Land Title Building, 19th Floor 

 100 South Broad Street 

 Philadelphia, PA 19110 

 (215) 735-8600 

Dated: June 9, 2003 

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 15 Filed 06/09/2003 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIUS LEE JACKSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0983 LKK GGH P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 1, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00983-LKK -GGH Document 58 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 1, 2005, are adopted in full; and 

2. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m), defendant Campbell is dismissed from this

action.

DATED: March 10, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/jack0983.801

Case 2:04-cv-00983-LKK -GGH Document 58 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. (the  "Partnership")
for the  period  ended  March 31, 2006 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Kathleen Skero,
Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 12, 2006
_____________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 8 (Friday, January 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1531]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-333]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at http://www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than February 9, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Andre Anderson, Vice President) 
1000 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:
    1. First Citizens Financial Corporation, Dawsonville, Georgia; to 
become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the 
outstanding shares of First Citizens Bank of Georgia, Dawsonville, 
Georgia (in organization).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, January 9, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-333 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
February24,201 0 \ 3 3 Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretary Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerseyAvenue , S E Washington , D.C

. 

### 2059 0 Subject : Haned a Combinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dea rSecretaryLaHood : A s a dedicate d trave l partne ro fAmerica n Airlines , I a m writin g i n suppor to fAmerican' s applicatio n t o provid e ne wservic e fro m Ne wYork' s Joh n F

. Kenned yInternationa l Airpor t an d Lo s Angele s Internationa l Airpor t t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda

. 1 recogniz e an d applau d yo u an d th e Obam a administratio n fo ryou rsucces s las t Decembe ri n reachin g a landmar k

Ope n Skie s agreemen t wit h Japan , whic h open s u p Haned a t o servic e byU.S

. airlines

. I encourag e you rselectio n o fAmerica n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro m Ne wYor k an d Lo s Angele s t o Haned a i n orde rt o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o fth e world' s financia l an d commerc e centers
. Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o fJapa n Airlines ' oneworl d Allianc e membership , hav e underscore d American' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans-Pacifi cmarket

. America n i s likewis e committe d t o Ne wYor k

an d Lo s Angle s - bot h vita l foca l point s o fbusiness , trade , entertainment , technolog yan d educatio n

- providin g unsurpasse d ai rservic e sinc e th e mid-1900 s Bot h th e Ne wYor k

an d Los Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan t economi cbenefit s fro m thes e propose d ne wflights , a

s wil l American' s customer s an d employees

. However , w e nee d you rhel p t o mak e th e JFK/Haned a connectio n a reality

. Therefore , I strongl yurg e yo u t o sa yye s t o America n Airline s an d it s reques t fo rslot s t o fl yfro m Kenned yt o Haneda ! Sincerely ,
/ /^A.^< £/^Jj^v , C o H.LS

. internationa l Tour s (NY) , Inc

.
Before the Second Division,

May 2, 1947

No. 51691.

#### Protest 916411-G of Halle Bros. Co. (Cleveland).

*190Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.