59240 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce the Safety Zone; 

Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier Southeast, 

Chicago, IL listed in 33 CFR 165.931 for 

the following events: 

Navy Pier Fireworks with times and 

dates as follows: 

October 26, 2013 from 9:15 p.m. 

through 9:45 p.m.; 

November 23, 2013 from 8:45 p.m. 

through 9:25 p.m.; 

December 31, 2013 from 6:45 p.m. 

through 7:25 p.m.; 

December 31, 2013 at 11:45 p.m. 

through January 1, 2014 at 12:30 

a.m. 

This safety zone encompasses the 

waters of Lake Michigan within Chicago 

Harbor bounded by coordinates 

beginning at 41°53′26.5′′ N, 087°35′26.5′′ 

W; then south to 41°53′7.6′′ N, 

087°35′26.3′′ W; then west to 41°53′7.6′′ 

N, 087°36′23.2′′ W; then north to 

41°53′26.5′′ N, 087°36′24.6′′ W; then east 

back to the point of origin (NAD 83). All 

vessels must obtain permission from the 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his on-scene representative to enter, 

move within or exit the safety zone. 

Vessels and persons granted permission 

to enter the safety zone shall obey all 

lawful orders or directions of the 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his on-scene representative. 

This notice is issued under authority 

of 33 CFR 165.931 and 5 U.S.C. 552 (a). 

In addition to this notice in the Federal 

Register, the Coast Guard will provide 

the maritime community with advance 

notification of these enforcement 

periods via broadcast Notice to Mariners 

or Local Notice to Mariners. If the 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, 

determines that the safety zone need not 

be enforced for the full duration stated 

in this notice, he may use a Broadcast 

Notice to Mariners to grant general 

permission to enter the safety zone. The 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his on-scene representative may be 

contacted via VHF Channel 16. 

Dated: September 13, 2013. 

M.W. Sibley, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. 2013–23381 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket No. USCG–2013–0309] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Chicago Harbor, Navy 

Pier East, Chicago, IL 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of 

regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce 

the Navy Pier East Safety Zone in 

Chicago Harbor from 9:15 p.m. until 

9:55 p.m. on September 26, 2013. This 

action is necessary and intended to 

ensure safety of life on the navigable 

waters of the United States immediately 

prior to, during, and immediately after 

a fireworks display. Enforcement of this 

safety zone will establish restrictions 

upon, and control movement of, vessels 

in a specified area immediately prior to, 

during, and immediately after a 

fireworks display. During the 

enforcement period, no person or vessel 

may enter the safety zone without 

permission of the Captain of the Port, 

Lake Michigan. 

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 

165.933 will be enforced from 9:15 p.m. 

until 9:55 p.m. on September 26, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice, call 

or email MST1 Joseph McCollum, 

Prevention Department, Coast Guard 

Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at 

414–747–7148, email 

Joseph.P.Mccollum@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast 

Guard will enforce the Safety Zone; 

Chicago Harbor, Navy Pier East, 

Chicago, IL listed in 33 CFR 165.933 for 

a fireworks display from a barge located 

between the Navy Pier in Chicago, IL 

and the breakwall to the east of Navy 

Pier. This zone will be enforced from 

9:15 p.m. until 9:55 p.m. on September 

26, 2013. 

All vessels must obtain permission 

from the Captain of the Port, Lake 

Michigan, or his on-scene representative 

to enter, move within or exit the safety 

zone. Vessels and persons granted 

permission to enter the safety zone shall 

obey all lawful orders or directions of 

the Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, 

or his on-scene representative. 

This notice is issued under authority 

of 33 CFR 165.933 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a). 

In addition to this notice in the Federal 

Register, the Coast Guard will provide 

the maritime community with advance 

notification of this enforcement period 

via broadcast Notice to Mariners or 

Local Notice to Mariners. If the Captain 

of the Port, Lake Michigan, determines 

that the safety zone need not be 

enforced for the full duration stated in 

this notice, he may use a Broadcast 

Notice to Mariners to grant general 

permission to enter the safety zone. The 

Captain of the Port, Lake Michigan, or 

his on-scene representative may be 

contacted via VHF Channel 16. 

Dated: September 13, 2013. 

M.W. Sibley, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port, Lake Michigan. 

[FR Doc. 2013–23383 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0066; FRL–9901–20– 

Region3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Maryland; Adoption of Control 

Techniques Guidelines for 

Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts 

Which Includes Pleasure Craft Coating 

Operations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision 

submitted by the State of Maryland. The 

revision consists of a new regulation 

pertaining to control of volatile organic 

compound (VOC) emissions from 

pleasure craft coating operations. EPA is 

approving the revision to reduce further 

VOC emissions from pleasure craft 

coating operations in accordance with 

the requirements of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA). 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

October 28, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

Number EPA–R03–OAR–2013–0066. All 

documents in the docket are listed in 

the www.regulations.gov Web site. 

Although listed in the electronic docket, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., confidential business 

information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 59241 

available either electronically through 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for 

public inspection during normal 

business hours at the Air Protection 

Division, U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Maryland Department of 

the Environment, 1800 Washington 

Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21230. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gregory Becoat, (215) 814–2036, or by 

email at becoat.gregory@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

On May 16, 2013 (78 FR 28773), EPA 

published a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPR) for the State of 

Maryland. The NPR proposed approval 

of Maryland’s Regulation .27–1 under 

COMAR 26.11.19—Volatile Organic 

Compounds from Specific Processes. On 

January 10, 2013, Maryland submitted 

the formal SIP revision (#12–08) 

adopting the requirements as 

recommended by EPA’s control 

technique guidelines (CTG) for 

Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Plastic 

Coating (MMPPC) operations and as 

recommended by trade associations 

representing the pleasure craft industry. 

II. Summary of SIP Revision 

The SIP revision adds Regulation .27– 

1 under COMAR 26.11.19 in order to: 

(1) Establish applicability for pleasure 

craft and fiberglass boat coating 

operations; (2) establish exemptions; (3) 

add definitions and terms to reflect 

pleasure craft coating operations; (4) 

incorporate by reference the standard 

test method for Specular Gloss; (5) 

establish that the least stringent 

emission limitation is applicable if more 

than one emission limitation applies to 

a specific coating; (6) establish 

application methods; and (7) specify 

VOC limit requirements for pleasure 

craft coating operations. EPA received 

no adverse comments on the NPR to 

approve Maryland’s SIP revision. A 

more complete explanation of the 

amendments and the rationale for EPA’s 

proposed action is explained in the 

technical support document and the 

NPR in support of this final rulemaking 

and will not be restated here. 

III. Final Action 

EPA is approving Maryland’s SIP 

revision adopting a new regulation to 

control VOC emissions from pleasure 

craft coating operations. 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

A. General Requirements 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this rule does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not approved to apply in Indian country 

located in the state, and EPA notes that 

it will not impose substantial direct 

costs on tribal governments or preempt 

tribal law. 

B. Submission to Congress and the 

Comptroller General 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

C. Petitions for Judicial Review 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by November 25, 2013. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action 

approving Maryland’s amendments to 

regulations for the control of VOCs for 

MMPPC may not be challenged later in 

proceedings to enforce its requirements. 

(See section 307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Volatile organic 

compounds. 

Dated: August 29, 2013. 

W.C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES

59242 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 187 / Thursday, September 26, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

Subpart V—Maryland 

■ 2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by adding an entry for 

COMAR 26.11.19.27–1, after the 

existing entry for COMAR 26.11.19.27. 

The added text reads as follows: 

§ 52.1070 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS, TECHNICAL MEMORANDA, AND STATUTES IN THE MARYLAND SIP 

Code of Maryland Administrative Regulations (COMAR) citation 

Title/subject State effective 

date EPA-Approval date 

Additional 

explanation/ 

citation at 

40 CFR 52.1100 

*******

26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds From Specific Processes 

*******

26.11.19.27–1 ........... Control of Volatile Organic Compounds 

from Pleasure Craft Coating Operations.

10/12/12 9/26/13 [Insert page number where the 

document begins].

Regulation Added. 

*******

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2013–23100 Filed 9–25–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R08–OAR–2012–0958; FRL–9786–3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; Utah; 

Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour 

Ozone Standard for Salt Lake County 

and Davis County 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is partially approving 

and partially disapproving State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions 

submitted by the Governor of Utah on 

March 22, 2007. The SIP revision is the 

State of Utah’s maintenance plan for the 

1997 8-hour ozone standard for Salt 

Lake County and Davis County, along 

with associated rules: R307–101–2, 

‘‘Definitions;’’ R307–110–13, ‘‘Section 

IX, Control Measures for Area and Point 

Sources, Part D, Ozone;’’ R307–320, 

‘‘Ozone Maintenance Areas and Ogden 

City: Employer-Based Trip Reduction 

Program;’’ R307–325, ‘‘Ozone 

Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: 

General Requirements;’’ R307–326, 

‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and 

Maintenance Areas: Control of 

Hydrocarbon Emissions in Petroleum 

Refineries;’’ R307–327, ‘‘Ozone 

Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: 

Petroleum Liquid Storage;’’ R307–328, 

‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and 

Maintenance Areas and Utah and Weber 

Counties: Gasoline Transfer and 

Storage;’’ R307–335, ‘‘Ozone 

Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: 

Degreasing and Solvent Cleaning 

Operations;’’ R307–340, ‘‘Ozone 

Nonattainment and Maintenance Areas: 

Surface Coating Processes;’’ R307–341, 

‘‘Ozone Nonattainment and 

Maintenance Areas: Cutback Asphalt;’’ 

and R307–342, ‘‘Ozone Nonattainment 

and Maintenance Areas: Qualification of 

Contractors and Test Procedures for 

Vapor Recovery Systems for Gasoline 

Delivery Tanks.’’ This action is being 

taken under sections 107 and 110 of the 

Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). 

DATES: This action is effective on 

October 28, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket 

Identification No. EPA–R08–OAR– 

2012–0958. All documents in the docket 

are listed at http://www.regulations.gov. 

Although listed in the index, some 

information may not be publicly 

available, i.e., Confidential Business 

Information or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, is not placed on 

the Internet and will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically through 

http://www.regulations.gov or in hard 

copy at EPA Region 8, Air Quality 

Planning Unit (8P–AR), 1595 Wynkoop 

Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, 

excluding federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jody 

Ostendorf, Air Program, Mailcode 8P– 

AR, Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop St., 

Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 

312–7814, ostendorf.jody@epa.gov 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background of State Submittals 

A. Regulatory Context 

B. Ambient Ozone Conditions 

C. Our Proposal 

D. Public Participation 

E. Alternative Methods of Control (AMOC) 

and EPA’s Concurrence Requirement 

II. Final Action 

A. Maintenance Plan 

B. Rules 

III. Issues Raised by Commenters and EPA’s 

Responses 

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

Definitions 

For the purpose of this document, we 

are giving meaning to certain words as 

follows: 

(i) The words or initials Act or CAA mean 

or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the 

context indicates otherwise. 

(ii) The words EPA, we, us or our mean or 

refer to the United States Environmental 

Protection Agency. 

(iii) The initials SIP mean or refer to State 

Implementation Plan. 

(iv) The words State or Utah mean the 

State of Utah, unless the context indicates 

otherwise. 

I. Background of State Submittals 

A. Regulatory Context 

Under the CAA enacted in 1970, EPA 

established national ambient air quality 

standards (NAAQS) for certain 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES