alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD BARRON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1197 GEB GGH P

vs.

DR. USHA PAI, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 2, 2006, the court ordered plaintiff to file a pretrial statement within

thirty days. On August 22, 2006, plaintiff filed a document labeled pretrial statement. However,

this document does not comply with Local Rule 16-281 which sets forth the required contents for

pretrial statements.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s August 22, 2006, pretrial statement is disregarded;

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a pretrial

statement which complies with Local Rule 16-281;

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01197-GEB-GGH Document 56 Filed 09/06/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of Local Rule 16-

281.

DATED: 9/6/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:kj

bar1197.ord

Case 2:04-cv-01197-GEB-GGH Document 56 Filed 09/06/06 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN ELLIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1483 LKK CMK P

vs.

ALBONICO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 / AD TESTIFICANDUM

Benjamin Ellis, inmate #P-16230, a necessary and material witness in proceedings

in this case on April 20, 2010, is confined in Salinas Valley State Prison, Soledad, California, in

the custody of the Warden; in order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ

of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate in

Court, 15 Floor, Courtroom 4, United States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California th

on April 20, 2010, at 10:30 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to testify in United States District

Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of court proceedings or

as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution; 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this

inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order and

writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum on the Out-To-Court Desk, California State Prison -

Sacramento, P.O. Box 290007, Represa, California 95671.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden Anthony Hedgpeth, Salinas Valley State Prison, 31625 Highway 101, P.O.

Box 1020, Soledad, California 93960-1020:

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before the

United States District Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of

the proceedings or as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above

institution.

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody

of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

DATED: March 25, 2010

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01483-LKK -CMK Document 159 Filed 03/26/10 Page 1 of 1
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Reports, Statements & Publications
- Monthly Treasury Statement
- Previous Issues
- Historical Information

# Historical Reports (1954 – 1998) 

October 1997 – September 1998October 1996 – September 1997October 1995 – September 1996October 1993 – September 1995October 1991 – September 1993October 1989 – September 1991October 1988 – September 1989 October 1987 – September 1988 October 1986 – September 1987 October 1985 – September 1986 October 1984 – September 1985 October 1983 – September 1984 October 1982 – September 1983October 1981 – September 1982 October 1980 – September 1981 October 1979 – September 1980 October 1978 – September 1979October 1977 – September 1978October 1976 – September 1977January 1976 – September 1976January 1973 – December 1975January 1970 – December 1972 January 1967 – December 1969January 1964 – December 1966 January 1963 – December 1963January 1958 – December 1962February 1954 – December 1957

Last modified 03/23/21
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           Dec-31-1998
<BOOK-VALUE>                             PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               2,316,448
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               343,247
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                    188,181
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  164,488
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,012,364
<COMMON>                                  449,697
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  (1,668)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       443,699
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>            891,802
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          62
<PREFERRED>                                89,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                      749,283
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                         10,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>             163,630
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>          1,108,661
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           3,012,364
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                 938,941
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                       78,782
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                675,994
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                754,776
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   184,165
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                          8,297
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            192,462
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   71,740
<NET-INCOME>                              120,722
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 3,884
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>             116,838
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                  101,495
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                  57,012
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                    302,663
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                1.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.89


</TABLE>
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 1 1 0 5 2 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. R A Y M O N D G A R C I A C A R M O N A , J R

. , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 1 : 0 8

- C R

- 4 3

- 3

B e f o r e D A V I S , S M I T H , a n d W I E N E R , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t R a y m o n d G a r c i a C a r m o n a , J r
. , h a s

m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. C a r m o n a h a s n o t f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D August 17, 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-11052 Document: 00511205710 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
Before Chief Judge Rao,

January 10, 1968

No. R68/6.

reappraisement R65/9652 (San Francisco).

#### Lolly Togs, Ltd. *v.*United States,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *Lollytogs, Ltd.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 608, Reap. Dec. 11073), the court *1059found and Reid that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise (children’s clothing) and that said value is represented by the invoice unit f.o.b. values, net packed, exclusion of any additional charges or commissions.
Exhibit 23(b), Form 10-K
Kansas City Life Insurance Company


Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 2-97351) pertaining to the Savings and Investment Plan of Kansas City
Life Insurance Company of our report dated February 23, 1996, with respect to
the financial statements and schedules of the Kansas City Life Insurance Company
Savings and Investment Plan included in this Annual Report (Form 11-K) for the
year ended December 31, 1995.



 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 22, 1996
No. 59530.

protests 189473-K, etc. (Providence).

#### Walker Top Associates *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was orally stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*
      *335v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content (T. D. 53159),” as indicated in exhibit 1, received in evidence herein and made a part of the decision in this case.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The X-Change  Corporation,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2004, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Chief  Financial
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

(1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/S/ Scott Thompson
Scott Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


April 13, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB soley
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Curative Health Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul F. McConnell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                        /s/ Paul F. McConnell
                                        ---------------------------------
                                            Paul F. McConnell
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            November 14, 2005
Exhibit 10.2

 

Execution Version

 

NorthStar Asset Management Group, Inc.

 

October 13, 2016

 

Daniel Gilbert

c/o NorthStar Asset Management Group Inc.

399 Park Avenue, 18th Floor

New York, NY  10022

 

Dear Daniel:

 

The purpose of this letter is to amend the letter agreement entered into by and among you Northstar Asset Management Group Inc. (“NSAM”), NorthStar Realty Finance Corp. (“NRF”), Northstar Asset Management Group, Ltd. and NSAM Bermuda, Ltd dated as of June 2, 2016, as amended (the “Original Letter Agreement”).  All capitalized terms in this letter that are not otherwise defined will have the meaning set forth in the Original Letter Agreement.

 

The parties acknowledge and agree that the last sentence of the third paragraph of the Original Letter Agreement will be deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following:

 

“The number of Shares subject to the Replacement Award will be determined by dividing (i) $23,082,043 by (ii) the greater of (A) the volume weighted average price of a Share over the first five trading days immediately following the Closing Date and (B) $15 per Share.”

 

Except as expressly amended hereby, the Original Letter Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its original terms.

 

This letter agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

 

[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

 











 

Please sign below to indicate your acknowledgement and acceptance of the terms of this side letter.

 

 

	
 
    	
Very   truly yours, 

 

NORTHSTAR   ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   RONALD J. LIEBERMAN
    
	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Ronald   J. Lieberman
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Executive   Vice President, General counsel & Secretary
    


 

 

Agreed to and acknowledged

as of the 13th day of October, 2016:

 

 

	
/s/ Daniel Gilbert
    	
 
    


 

[SIGNATURE PAGE GILBERT SIDE LETTER]

 











 

Agreed to and acknowledged by:

 

NORTHSTAR REALTY FINANCE CORP.

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   DEBRA A. HESS
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Debra   A. Hess
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Chief   Financial Officer
    	
 
    


 

 

NORTHSTAR ASSET MANAGEMENT GROUP, LTD

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   RONALD J. LIEBERMAN
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Ronald   J. Lieberman
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Executive   Vice President, General counsel & Secretary
    	
 
    


 

 

NSAM BERMUDA, LTD.

 

	
By:
    	
/s/   STEVEN B. KAUFF
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
Steven   B. Kauff
    	
 
    
	
Title:
    	
Director
    	
 
    


 

[SIGNATURE PAGE GILBERT SIDE LETTER]
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4456 

To amend the Granger-Thye Act to modify the maximum term for certain 

special use permits for housing. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2024 

Mr. BARRASSO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Granger-Thye Act to modify the maximum 

term for certain special use permits for housing. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FOREST SERVICE SPECIAL USE PERMITS FOR 

4 HOUSING. 

5 Section 7 of the Act of April 24, 1950 (commonly 

6 known as the ‘‘Granger-Thye Act’’) (64 Stat. 84, chapter 

7 97; 16 U.S.C. 580d), is amended by striking ‘‘thirty years 

8 as determined by him’’ and inserting ‘‘30 years, or in the 

9 case of a permit for housing that is located west of the 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4456 IS

1 100th meridian in the contiguous 48 States, 100 years, 

2 as determined by the Secretary of Agriculture’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HOLMES PRODUCTS CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           9,484
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,292
<ALLOWANCES>                                       592
<INVENTORY>                                     57,783
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               102,725
<PP&E>                                          36,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,790
<BONDS>                                        125,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,314
<OTHER-SE>                                    (41,019)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,895
<SALES>                                         44,895
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,895
<CGS>                                           30,830
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,830
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,691<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,432
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    382
<INCOME-TAX>                                        96
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                286
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       286
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Product development expenses.
<F2>The Company's shares are not publicly traded.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4458 

To reauthorize the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 4, 2024 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act 

of 2006, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Water Supply 

5 Program Reauthorization Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF RECLAMATION RURAL 

7 WATER SUPPLY ACT OF 2006. 

8 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

9 109(a) of the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4458 IS

1 2006 (43 U.S.C. 2408(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘2016’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘2032’’. 

3 (b) TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY.—Section 110 of 

4 the Reclamation Rural Water Supply Act of 2006 (43 

5 U.S.C. 2409) is amended by striking ‘‘2016’’ and insert6 ing ‘‘2032’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLINTON HARRY STODDARD, No. CIV S-04-1517-FCD-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, filed this action on August 2, 2004. On that

same date, the court issued an order requiring plaintiff to serve the defendant in a timely manner

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). To date, more than 120 days have passed since

the complaint was filed and it appears that the defendant has not been served. 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01517-FCD-CMK Document 7 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause in

writing, within 20 days of the date of service of this order, why this action should not be

dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with rules and court order. See Local

Rule 11-110.

DATED: September 21, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01517-FCD-CMK Document 7 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 60833.

#### Maher-App & Company *v.*United States,

protests 259188-K/14498 and 259189-K/14536 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.