alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency 

          - [FEMA-1678-DR] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Oklahoma (FEMA-1678-DR), dated February 1, 2007, and related determinations. 

# EFFECTIVE DATE:

February 21, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Oklahoma is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the catastrophe declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of February 1, 2007: 

Alfalfa, Canadian, Comanche, Dewey, Garvin, Grant, Greer, Jackson, Jefferson, Kay, Lincoln, Osage, Pontotoc, Pottawatomie, Rogers, Tillman, Tulsa, Washington, Washita, and Woods Counties for Public Assistance. 

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

R. David Paulison, 

Under Secretary for Federal Emergency Management and Director of FEMA. 

 [FR Doc. E7-3651 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P
unis-ex1081_318.htm



Exhibit 10.81

 

AMENDMENT TO LETTER AGREEMENT

THIS AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”), dated and effective as of October 13, 2015, is made by and between UNILIFE CORPORATION (“Unilife”), and MICHAEL C. RATIGAN (“Ratigan”).

WHEREAS, Unilife and Ratigan have entered into a letter agreement, dated as of August 29, 2012 (the “Agreement”), as amended by an agreement dated September 10, 2015, in connection with Ratigan’s employment by Unilife;

WHEREAS, the Agreement provides that Unilife and Ratigan may amend the Agreement by mutual agreement in writing; and

WHEREAS, Unilife and Ratigan desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein; and 

WHEREAS, in consideration for Ratigan’s continued employment, Unilife and Ratigan desire to continue Ratigan’s employment subject to the terms set forth herein.  

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits to be derived herefrom and other good valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

1.The Agreement is amended to add the following paragraph:

Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective with Unilife’s payroll ending October 9, 2015 and through December 31, 2015, Ratigan’s base salary payable during such period shall be reduced by fifty percent (50%).  Effective January 1, 2016, Ratigan shall again be entitled to his base salary payable in accordance with Unilife’s standard payroll practices.

2.Capitalized terms not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Agreement.  This Amendment contains the entire agreement between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Amendment and supersedes any prior agreements or understandings between the parties concerning the subject matter of this Amendment, whether oral or written.  The parties acknowledge, in entering into this Amendment that they have not relied upon any promise or inducement not specifically set forth herein.  All other provisions of the Agreement and any prior amendments not modified or amended by this Amendment shall continue in full force and effect.

3.This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall for all purposes be deemed to be an original and all of which shall constitute the same instrument.

<signature page follows>

DM3\3577814.1



 

IN WITNESS HEREOF, and wishing to be legally bound, Unilife has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer, and Ratigan has executed this Amendment, in each case on the date first set forth above.

 


			
	
UNILIFE CORPORATION

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ John Ryan

	
Title:
	
 
	
SVP, GC & Sec

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
MICHAEL C. RATIGAN

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
/s/ Michael C. Ratigan

	
 
	
 
	
SVP & CCO




 

2

DM3\3577814.1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4282 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4282

To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from implementing any rule or 
  regulation requiring the mandatory use of electronic identification 
                      eartags on cattle and bison.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2024

  Mr. Rounds introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from implementing any rule or 
  regulation requiring the mandatory use of electronic identification 
                      eartags on cattle and bison.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ELECTRONIC IDENTIFICATION EARTAG MANDATES FOR 
              CATTLE AND BISON.

    The Secretary of Agriculture shall not implement any rule or 
regulation requiring the mandatory use of electronic identification 
eartags on cattle or bison.
                                 <all>
```
No. 57280.

protests 193566-K, 196896-K (A), and 196983-K (B) (New York).

#### Freedman & Slater, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hair of the vicuna in the grease, not scoured, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.2
                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott Thompson, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this annual report on form 10-KSB of the X- Change
Corporation, Inc. (the "Company").

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in exchange act rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: April 5, 2007
/S/ Scott R. Thompson
Scott Thompson
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4383 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 to provide for 

environmental infrastructure in coastal Georgia. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 21, 2024 

Mr. OSSOFF (for himself and Mr. WARNOCK) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 

to provide for environmental infrastructure in coastal 

Georgia. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Coastal Georgia Flood5 ing Prevention Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. COASTAL GEORGIA. 

7 Section 219(f) of the Water Resources Development 

8 Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 113 Stat. 334; 136 Stat. 

9 3808) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4383 IS

1 ‘‘(406) COASTAL GEORGIA.—$5,000,000 for en2 vironmental infrastructure, including water and 

3 wastewater infrastructure (including stormwater 

4 management), Glynn County, Chatham County, 

5 Bryan County, Effingham County, McIntosh Coun6 ty, and Camden County, Georgia.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 58020.

Suit 4765.

#### United States *v.*Fuchs Shoe Corporation.

C. D. 1466 reversed December 30, 1953. C. A. D. 547.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 19, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-11233

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

NIAZI MAHMOUD MOHAMED SADDIG,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:02-CR-153-1-A

--------------------

Before DAVIS, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Niazi

Mahmoud Mohamed Saddig has requested leave to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Saddig has not responded to the motion. Our independent

review of counsel’s brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
No. 02-11233

-2-

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the

appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.
|   | Exhibit 21, Form 10-K/A |
|--------|-------------------------|

|   | Kansas City Life Insurance Company |
|--------|------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

|   | **SUBSIDIARIES** |
|--------|------------------|

 

 

 

|   | Kansas City Life Insurance Company's significant                            insurance subsidiaries are: |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

1. Sunset Life Insurance Company of America, a corporation organized            under the laws of the State of Washington and redomesticated to the State of            Missouri.

 

|   | 2. Old American Insurance Company, a corporation                            organized under the laws of the State of Missouri. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | The Company's non-insurance subsidiaries are not                            significant individually or in the aggregate. |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Irwin Financial Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the Report), I,
William I. Miller, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                   
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                     |                       |                                     
|-------------------- | --------------------- | ------------------------------------
|Dated: March 9, 2004 | /s/ William I. Miller
|                     |                       |                                     
|                     |                       | William I. Miller                   
|                     |                       | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:October16,
                2006
            By:
            */s/
              Jay P.
              Nash*Name:Jay
                    P. Nash
                  Title:Chief
                      Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001053178
<NAME>                        SHERWOOD BRANDS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,199,169
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,658,856
<ALLOWANCES>                                   120,816
<INVENTORY>                                    8,903,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               16,686,174
<PP&E>                                         4,088,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                 780,789
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 20,116,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          9,118,605
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       37,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     9,728,570
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   20,116,316
<SALES>                                        37,393,057
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               37,393,057
<CGS>                                          28,188,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,145,199
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               640,765
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             333,130
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,392,771
<INCOME-TAX>                                   500,004
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            892,767
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   892,767
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.24



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Plaintiff’s last request was denied by order filed January 18, 2006. 1

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRENCE BROWNLEE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1330 DFL PAN P

vs.

J. BURLESON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed a renewed motion for the appointment of counsel. The United 1

States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent

indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298

(1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of

counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.

1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the

court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s renewed motion for the

appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01330-DFL-EFB Document 42 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 23, 2006 motion

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: February 28, 2006. 

 

12

brow1330.31

Case 2:04-cv-01330-DFL-EFB Document 42 Filed 03/01/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

February 14, 1951

No. 55239.

#### Continental Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 156966-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum statuettes and rosaries in glass. containers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 54602, the items in question were held dutiable as follows: The statuettes at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as manufactures of metal; the rosaries, being valued at more than $1.25 per dozen, at 30 percent under the *eo nomine*provision therefor in paragraph 1544; and the glass containers at the same rate as their contents as the usual containers for the involved merchandise.
Case No. 13,150.

#### SNOWDEN v. McGUIRE.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 6.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1810.

Evi hence — Costs—Correcting Vbkdict.

1. In an action of assault and battery, the questions, “Who printed the handbill?'’ and ‘"Where was it printed?" are too general: not showing any agency of the defendant.

*7372. If the jury give only one cent damages, believing that it would carry costs, when it would not, they will not be permitted, after the verdict has been taken and they have been discharged from the cause, to go out again to alter their verdict.

Assault and battery.

THE COURT refused to suffer the plaintiff’s witness to be asked by the plaintiff’s counsel where the handbill was printed, as being too general. THE COURT, for the same reason, refused to suffer the witness to be asked who printed it. (THRUSTOX, J., absent.)

After the verdict had been taken for one cent damages, and the jury had been discharged from the cause and retired from the bar. but not out of the passage to the court-house, the foreman came into court, and informed the court that they had understood that one cent damages would carry the costs; and that they supposed, as the assault was admitted, they were bound by law to give damages enough to carry the costs, but they now understood that one cent would not carry the costs.

Mr. Taylor, for plaintiff,

prayed the court to suffer the jury to retire- again and correct their verdict, and stated that such was the practice in Virginia.

Mr. Jones, for defendant, objected.

THE COURT

(THRUSTOX, Circuit Judge, absent)

refused.
No. 51982.

#### Kelbert Watch Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 131341-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.