alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Annual Report of Husky Energy Inc. (the“Company”) onForm 40-F for thefiscal year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John C.S. Lau, President &Chief Executive Officer and in my capacity as Acting ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and  2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.Date: March 14, 2006/s/ John C.S. Lau John C.S. LauPresident & Chief Executive Officer andIn my capacity as Acting Chief Financial Officer
## U.S. Imports by Country of Origin

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_move_impcus_a2_nus_epooxe_im0_mbbl_a.htm



### Data 1: U.S. Fuel Ethanol (Renewable) Imports

SourcekeyMFEIMUS1MFEIM_NUSNEC_1 MFEIM_NUSMN0_1 MFEIM_NUSNAR_1 M_EPOOXE_IM

0_NUSNBE_MBBLMFEIM_NUSNBR_1 MFEIM_NUSNCA_1 MFEIM_NUSNCH_1

DateU.S. Imports

of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from Ecuador of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from NonOPEC Countries of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels) U.S. Imports

from Argentina of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from Belgium of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from Brazil of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from Canada of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels) U.S. Imports

from China of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels) 1993 244 1994 279 1995 387 1996 313 1997 85 1998 66 1999 87 2000 116 2001 315 2002 306 2003 292 2004 3542 3542 2052 148 2005 3234 3234 822 77 2006 17408 17408 45 10783 196 791 2007 10457 100 10457 4403 179 2008 12610 12610 4835 120 2009 4720 4720 125 267 2010 373 373 314 2011 4092 4092 2399 47 2012 11654 11654 2 9606 4MFEIM_NUSNCF_1 MFEIM_NUSNCS_1 MFEIM_NUSNES_1 M_EPOOXE_IM

0_NUSNGT_MBBLMFEIM_NUSNJM_1 MFEIM_NUSNNL_1 MFEIM_NUSNNU_1 MFEIM_NUSNPK_1 MFEIM_NUSNSW_1

U.S. Imports from Congo (Brazzaville) of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from Costa Rica of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from El Salvador of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from Guatemala of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels) U.S. Imports

from Jamaica of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from Netherlands of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels) U.S. Imports

from Nicaragua of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from Pakistan of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels) U.S. Imports

from Sweden of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)

491 128 723 753 563 810 40 769 2108 1898 36 94

1056 1730 1771 4 872 1667 2351 29 270 786 2164 59 293 577 216 594 118 954 95 65MFEIM_NUSNTD_1 MFEIM_NUSNVQ_1

U.S. Imports from Trinidad and Tobago of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels)U.S. Imports

from Virgin Islands of Fuel Ethanol (Thousand Barrels) Total from Brazil and CBI (thousand barrels) Total from Brazil and CBI (mill gal)Total from all

countries (mill gal) 0 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 16 0 0 13 0 0 4 0 0 3 0 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 13 0 0 13 0 0 12 2775 117 149 209 1841 77 136 648 13329 560 731 1156 62 7392 310 439 1559 1177 9922 417 530 1021 87 3397 143 198 59 2 16 776 3752 158 172 10560 444 489
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the December
31, 1998 Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such From 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          36,272
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,871
<ALLOWANCES>                                       725
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,583
<PP&E>                                           3,203
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,923
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,038
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,081
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           130
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,038
<SALES>                                         10,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,251
<CGS>                                            7,580
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,580
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,717
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    46
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    360
<INCOME-TAX>                                       156
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       204
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
# sec6_rbalsh_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RBS - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2019
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


October 18, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 273


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on October 17, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-212825) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 42 (Monday, March 5, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9833]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3728]



[[Page 9833]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed--Taxpayer Burden 
Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed--Taxpayer 
Burden Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The TAP will be discussing issues 
pertaining to increasing compliance and lessening the burden for Small 
Business/Self Employed individuals.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, April 3, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisa Knispel at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-3557.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Small Business/Self Employed--Taxpayer 
Burden Reduction Committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, April 3, 2007 from 12:30 p.m. ET to 1:30 p.m. ET via a 
telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a 
written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-3557, or write 
to Marisa Knispel, TAP Office, 10 Metro Tech Center, 625 Fulton Street, 
Brooklyn, NY 11201. Due to limited conference lines, notification of 
intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be 
made with Marisa Knispel. Ms. Knispel can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 
or 718-488-3557, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 27, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
 [FR Doc. E7-3728 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Record of Ex Parte Contacts

Docket No. FAA-2011-1229 Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-132-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? (You might need to submit a separate 

record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines “Ex Parte Contacts.”)

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE RESPONSE

The Boeing Company Tom Croslin May 17, 

2011

No response

ATA Joe White June 7, 

2011

Nonconcur. Attach a record of comments.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information: Mr. Joe White (ATA) stated that the McDonnell Douglas airplane fuel 

tanks are low flammability. He felt there was no need for addressing ignition sources in such tanks, since 

there has not been any explosion of the DC9 MD80 MD90 airplane fuel tank, and the risk assessment 

should support his position.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDWARD JEFFERSON, No. CIV-S-04-1635 MCE/KJM PS

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

OFFICE, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

actions. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On May 25, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff

has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01635-MCE -KJM Document 9 Filed 06/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 25, 2005, are

adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local

Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

DATED: June 23, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01635-MCE -KJM Document 9 Filed 06/23/05 Page 2 of 2
### THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590



### The Honorable Alvin Brown Mayor ofJacksonville Jacksonville, FL 32202 Dear Mayor Brown: January 9, 2013 i'"....•,J'



### Thank you 

### for your letter supportingthe application ofJetBiue Airways for 

### two within-perimeter slot exemptions at Ronald Reagan Washi11gton National Airport (DCA). JetBlue proposes to serve Jacksonville International Airport with one nonstop round trip perday from DCA. We 

### received JetBiue's application on December 5, 2012. Othertimely applications**w~re** 

### received from Southwest Airlines, proposing one nonstop round trip to**Houston~s**

### William

## P. Hobby Airport, and from US Airways, proposing onenonstop round trip to Will Rogers World Airport in Oklahoma City. As the matter is still pending. Icannot comment onthe merits ofthe points raised in your letter. However, Ican assure you that all applications receivedby the U.S. Departmentof Transportation will be given due and careful consideration. The Department's action on this matter is being administered through apublic docket, which a11ows 

### all interested parties the opportunity to comment Following our normalpractice, I am placing acopy ofyoU!' 

### letter and this response i docket number DOT-OST-20 0-7182. Iappreciate your interest in this matter.

Ray LaHood\



### OFFICE OF MAYOR ALVIN BROWN
ST. JAMES BUILDING PH: (904) 630-1776 FAX: (904} 630-2J91 www.coj.net IIi WEST DUVAL STREET, SUITE 400

JACKSONVILLE. FLORIDA 32202

The Honorable Ray LaHood Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue 

### SE Washington, DC 20590

Dear 

### Mr.

# Sec~ December 5, 2012

I am writing to you as the Mayor ofthe City ofJacksonville to express our support for the application ofJetBlue Airways for new nonstop service between Ronald Reagan Washington NationalAirport and Jacksonville International Airport. With three military bases in the City, and anotherjust to our north, the Jacksonville area has the third largest military presence in the country. Several other government agencies, including a Federal Reserve Branch, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, a U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building, call Jacksonville home. Travel between Jacksonville a11d the Nation's Capital currenlly exceeds 530 people per day. JetBiue's usual low fare stimulation in the market will provide more competitive pricing and assure that Northeast Florida and Southeast Georgia residents have choices for air service to this very important region. Your approval ofJetBlue's service would be a**m<~jor** benefitfor the City ofJacksonville as well as the rest ofNortheast Florida and Southeast Georgia, wherebusinesses and our military have strong links with Washington, D.C. Thank you for your consideration.

Alvin Brown Mayor, City ofJacksonville
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-14	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 7/11/19
**Worksheet Description** 



### Annual_Undiscounted This worksheet pulls undiscounted benefits estimates for the elimination of baseline IM&E losses from other excel workbooks and presents them in a single table. Values in 2011$. **New Units Benefits Inputs_03.20.14** Author: Abt Associates Inc. Created: 03/20/14 Purpose: This is an input file for the New Units Benefits SAS Model.lossmode region com rec_low rec_mean rec_high TE BT SP_survey_low SP_survey_mean

i National 1,817,604 18,209,410 35,278,636 69,546,433 800,836 617,994 1,487,453,843 2,454,098,607

e National 7,494,288 31,934,807 56,071,183 101,785,532 586,193103,774,273 2,797,108,480 4,334,220,816 ie National 9,311,892 50,144,217 91,349,818 171,331,9651,387,030104,392,267 4,284,562,323 6,788,319,423SP_survey_high

3,418,053,205 6,135,330,558 9,553,383,763
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v JAMES R. WOODARD, Captain, U. S. Army, Appellant

18 USCMA 6, 39 CMR 6

No. 21,342

November 1, 1968

*Charles M. Beatty, Jr., Esquire,*was on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel David Rarick, Major Edwin P. Wasinger,*and *Captain Larry S. Seuferer*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

A general court-martial convicted the accused of several offenses, including sodomy, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 925. We granted review to consider whether he was prejudiced as to the latter offense by the admission in evidence , of a book of photographs described as “homosexual literature.”

The law officer overruled a defense objection to admission of the book on the ground that it had probative value to establish motive and “outweigh [ed] the risk of harm to the accused.” The board of review sustained the ruling. We disagree.

Possession of a book of photographs of famous paintings is not evidence that the possessor is a lover of art. Sim*7ilarly, possession of the book admitted in evidence at this trial is not relevant to the alleged act of sodomy. See United States v Warren, 6 USCMA 419, 424, 20 CMR 135; cf. United States v Battista, 14 USCMA 70, 73, 33 CMR 282.

The decision of the board of review as to Charge II and the sentence is reversed. The findings of guilty as to Charge II and the sentence are set aside, and the record of trial is returned to the board of review. In its discretion, the board may direct a rehearing on Charge II and the sentence, or dismiss the charge and reassess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty.
No. 63092.

Suit 4964.

#### Concord Watch Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C.D. 1980 affirmed February 11, 1959. C.A.D. 703.
No. 64845.

#### Venetianaire Corp. of America *v.*United States,

protest 60/14523 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM J. BIGGS AND 

BETTY BIGGS,

Defendants.

CIV S-04-1263 FCD PAN PS

ORDER

—NFN—

On January 27, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion to compel defendants’ depositions and for

sanctions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(d). The motion came on regularly for hearing February 23, 2006. 

John F. Gisla appeared for plaintiff. Defendants neither appeared nor filed any opposition to

plaintiff’s motion. Upon review of plaintiff’s motion and the documents in support thereof, upon

hearing the argument of plaintiff’s counsel and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT

GRANTS PLAINTIFF’S JANUARY 27, 2006, MOTION AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Defendants William and Betty Biggs shall appear for their depositions on Friday,

March 3, 2006, at 10:00 a.m., at the Office of the U.S. Attorney, 501 I Street, Suite 10-100,

Case 2:04-cv-01263-FCD-GGH Document 38 Filed 02/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Plaintiff’s counsel stated at the hearing on this matter that he spent 2 hours waiting for defendants to 1

appear at their depositions noticed for January 27, 2006, 1 hour preparing the instant motion, and .5 hour preparing

for and appearing at the hearing.

2

Sacramento, California 95814. 

2. Defendants shall pay plaintiff the reasonable expenses, including attorney fees,

incurred as a result of defendants’ failure to appear for their duly noticed depositions on January

27, 2006. Defendants shall pay plaintiff $796.25, which includes the fees of plaintiff’s counsel

(3.5 hours at $200 per hour) and the cost of retaining the court reporter ($96.25), both of which 1

the court finds reasonable.

3. Failure of defendants to appear for their depositions on March 3, 2006, may result in

an order striking defendants’ answer to plaintiff’s complaint and instructions to the Clerk of

Court to enter defendants’ default.

DATED: February 23, 2006.

006:bigg1263.ord

Case 2:04-cv-01263-FCD-GGH Document 38 Filed 02/24/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 64862.

#### Frederik Lunning, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/14846 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vases in mineral colors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62694, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM JACKSON KITCHENS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1206 MCE PAN P

vs.

PAT HOUGE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, without counsel, seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983. On March 13, 2006, plaintiff filed a document styled, “Request for Judicial Guidance

Re: Ben Parisi, Potential Defendant - Location.”

Plaintiff asserts he has been unable to locate defendant Parisi and requests advice

on how to proceed.

The court cannot give legal advice.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s March 13, 2006, request

is denied.

DATED: May 17, 2006.

\004\kitc1206.deny request

Case 2:04-cv-01206-MCE -EFB Document 53 Filed 05/18/06 Page 1 of 1
(Reap. Dec. 10058)

#### Ford Motor Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 815093, etc.

(Decided August 9, 1961)

*John A. Moekle*and *James B. O’Boyle*for tlie plaintiff.

*William B. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” attached to and made a part of this decision, present the question of the proper dutiable value of certain importations of automobiles.

Said appeals have been submitted for decision on a stipulation of fact wherein the parties have agreed as follows:

> That the merchandise and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule A, attached hereto, are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and issues in the ease of *Ford Motor Company*v. *United States,*decided in Reap. Dec. 9683 and affirmed in A.R.D. 124, and that the record in said case may be incorporated herein.

> That at the time of exportation of the involved automobiles neither such nor similar automobiles were being freely offered for sale in the country of exportation for home consumption or for export to the United States, nor freely offered for sale in the United States pursuant to Section 402a (e), (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that the cost of production thereof as defined in Section 402a (f) of said Act is the proper basis for appraisement of the involved automobiles.

Upon the record before tbe court, I find and bold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is the proper basis of value for the merchandise in issue and that said value is as shown in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of this decision.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

*435