alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

JOSE A. LOPEZ AND DIANA

LOPEZ,

Plaintiff(s),

vs. CIV-S-04-1447-MCE/GGH

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE 

INSURANCE COMPANY et al.,

Defendant(s).

______________________________________/

 Plaintiff filed a discovery motion on June 7, 2005 set for hearing June 30, 2005

@ 10:00 a.m.. Notwithstanding the three days specified by E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251 the joint

statement shall be filed in no later than five court days before the scheduled hearing.

Notwithstanding E.D. Cal. L.R. 5-133(f), if the joint statement is more than 25 pages, or the

attachments are longer than 50 pages, the copy shall be hand delivered or sent by overnight mail

to chambers on the day of filing. The filing deadline, accordingly, will be June 23, 2005.

The dispute may be organized by category, with specific discovery items attached,

if appropriate, as an exhibit. For each disputed category or individual item, include: (1) the

specific disputed discovery category or item; (2) the response; (3) the moving party’s position;

and (4) the opposition. E.D.Cal. L.R. 37-251(c)(3). Do not file separate briefing. Id.

Privilege objections must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). Except in

extraordinary circumstances, the party claiming privilege may not submit a post-hearing privilege

log. The failure properly to support a privilege objection with a privilege log may be deemed to

waive it. 

The moving party is responsible for filing the joint statement. The opposing party

nevertheless must timely draft and submit its portion. Failure of either party to use best efforts to

ensure timely filing will be cause for sanctions. 

Dated: 6/13/05 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 ___________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

U.S. Magistrate Judge

lopez1447.251-2

Case 2:04-cv-01447-MCE -GGH Document 36 Filed 06/14/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN ELLIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1483 LKK CMK P

vs.

ALBONICO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On August 18, 2005, plaintiff filed a “first amended complaint,” “notice of

motion for first amended complaint” and “declaration in support of notice of motion for first

amended complaint.” Those documents were not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that

every document submitted to the court for consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R.

Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the

U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendants, then

documents submitted by plaintiff must be served on that attorney and not on the defendants. 

Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se)

must include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to

defendants or their attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b)

and (c).

Case 2:04-cv-01483-LKK -CMK Document 18 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s August 18, 2005 “first

amended complaint,” “notice of motion for first amended complaint” and “declaration in support

of notice of motion for first amended complaint” are denied without prejudice. Plaintiff is

cautioned that failure to properly serve any documents subsequently filed in this action, and

failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed.

DATED: August 29, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01483-LKK -CMK Document 18 Filed 08/30/05 Page 2 of 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 27, 2020

No. 04-19-00861-CV

IN THE MATTER OF J.C.W.G.

From the 454th Judicial District Court, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 19-02-13115-CR

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s second request for an extension of time to file his brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on or before March 9, 2020; however, no further extensions will be 

granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of February, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-12279

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cv-00191-KD-M

VERNON MADISON, 

 Petitioner–Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Respondent–Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(January 24, 2018)

Before WILSON, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

MARTIN, Circuit Judge:

The United States Supreme Court reversed our March 15, 2017 opinion in 

this matter on November 6, 2017 and denied a Petition for Rehearing on January 8, 

2018. Our opinion is therefore VACATED, and this action is remanded to the 

District Court for reinstatement of the judgment denying habeas relief. 

Case: 16-12279 Date Filed: 01/24/2018 Page: 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8759-8760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3260]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Health Resources and Services Administration


Notice of Availability of Draft Policy Document for Comment

AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability and solicitation of comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of Availability and request for comments on 
the draft policy document, ``Emergency Management Program 
Expectations,'' prepared by HRSA. This document is currently posted on 
the Internet at http://bphc.hrsa.gov. Comments will be reviewed and 
analyzed, and a summary and general response will be published as soon 
as possible after the deadline for receipt of comments.

[[Page 8760]]


DATES: Comments must be received by April 13, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Please send your comments to the following e-mail address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d796d795a5853584f5c517d554f4e5c135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0e4f0e4c7c5cec5d2c1cce0c8d2d3c18ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Background: HRSA believes that community input is valuable to the 
development of policies and policy documents related to the 
implementation of HRSA programs, including the Health Center Program. 
In the August 29, 2006, Federal Register, HRSA announced its plan to 
periodically, as appropriate, solicit comments on some policies and 
policy documents via the HRSA Web site. The Emergency Management 
Program Expectations document is being posted as part of the 
implementation of this plan.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information on this process, 
see the HRSA notice in the August 29, 2006, Federal Register (71 FR 
51200).

    Dated: February 16, 2007.
Elizabeth M. Duke,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-3260 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Curative Health Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul F.
McConnell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


                                            /s/ Paul F. McConnell
                                            ------------------------------------
                                                Paul F. McConnell
                                                Chief Executive Officer
                                                May 10, 2005
No. 50970.

#### Protests 64224-K, etc., of Copeland & Thompson, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of oatmeals or oatmeal saucers the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Copeland & Thompson*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
November 17, 2015

FAA UAS Integration Office, 800 Independence Ave. SW. Washington DC 20591 To whom it concerns, CORRECTION: Petition for Exemption from Certain Federal Aviation Regulations, Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012
. Notification of Error in Submitted Document Pursuant to Regulaitons.gov Section 333 Exemption Comment: 1j z- 8lou- 9bcw After I submitted my application for an exemption, an independent review of my document was completed and it was highlighted that an error was made in an attempt to simplify the list of regulations from which an exemption is requested . On pages 8 and 21, no mention is made of **14 C.F.R. §91.215 ATC transponder and altitude reporting equipment and use**  **.** Please ensure that this particular regulation is included in the list of exempted regulations. This error in categorical simplification does not change the nature of the document or cause the document to fail to meet any requirement set forth in the Petition Guidelines located at the following address: http://aes.faa.gov/Petition/ Therefore, when my request is formally reviewed and processed, this document should also be utilized to complement my submitted exemption that was submitted to Regulations.gov since the reasoning for relief was (with the exception of this minor detail) properly requested within the original document . If you have any questions, p lease feel free to contact me.
Thank you, Eric Swanson (708) 653 - 6564 support@cardinaluav.com
##### 



Exhibit 10.20
 
  a.
    
    Each non-employee director receives a $10,000 annual
retainer, paid annually in advance.b.
    
    The chair of the Compensation Committee and the chair of the
Audit Committee each receive an additional $6,000 annual retainer, paid annually
in advance.
  a.
    
    Each non-employee director is paid $2,500 for each full Board
meeting he or she attends in person and $1,000 for each full Board meeting he or
she attends telephonically.b.
    
    Each non-employee director is paid $1,000 for each full Committee
meeting he or she attends in person and $500 for each full Committee meeting he or
she attends telephonically.
  a.
    
    Each non-employee director receives an annual option grant of 2,000
options at the May Board Meeting each year. The exercise price is the fair market
value on the date of grant. The director may exercise these options at any time
during the ten years from the date of grant.
  a.
    
    Each non-employee director receives a grant of 2,000 shares
of Katy Common Stock at the May Board Meeting each year. These shares are
unrestricted.
  a.
    
    Katy reimburses directors for their expenses incurred in
attending Board of Director and Committee meetings.
  a.
    
    Each non-employee director may defer directors fees,
retainers and other compensation paid for services as a director until the later
of the directors attainment of age 62 or ceasing to be a director. Each director
has 30 days before the beginning of a Plan Year (as defined in the Directors
Deferred Compensation Plan) in which to elect to participate in the Directors
Deferred Compensation Plan. Directors may invest these amounts in one or more
investment alternatives offered by Katy. Directors may elect to receive
distributions of deferred amounts in a lump sum or five annual installments.
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donovan Jones, Chief Executive Officer of CounterPath
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Donovan
Jones Donovan Jones President and Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2009

I, David Karp, Chief Financial Officer of CounterPath
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ David
Karp David KarpChief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

March 12, 2009

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 AND THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         617,603
<SECURITIES>                                   880,954
<RECEIVABLES>                               43,290,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,111,193
<INVENTORY>                                 53,415,793
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            99,956,622
<PP&E>                                      12,931,845
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,005,111
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,329,093
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       41,572,774
<BONDS>                                     41,965,877
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       625,226
<OTHER-SE>                                  42,165,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               126,329,093
<SALES>                                    209,325,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           209,325,180
<CGS>                                      162,443,001
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              162,443,001
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            34,522,667
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,558,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             10,800,954
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,425,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          6,375,954
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,375,954
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.11


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Only defense counsel filed a status report in this case. At the status conference, plaintiff 1

was questioned about his failure to follow the court’s order to file a status report and cautioned

that future failures to comply with either the Local Rules or court orders could result in

sanctions.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Anthony Alonzo,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S- 04-1622 GEB CMK

vs.

Anthony Principi

Defendant. ORDER

 /

A status conference was held in this matter on September 20, 2005, at 10:00 a.m.

before the Hon. Craig M. Kellison in Redding, California. Plaintiff, Anthony Alonzo, appeared

in propria persona. Joseph E. Maloney appeared telephonically for defendant. Upon

consideration of the status reports on file in this action , discussion of plaintiff and defense 1

counsel and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The plaintiff shall disclose expert witnesses no later than October 28, 2005. 

The defendant shall disclose expert witnesses no later than November 25, 2005. The parties are

reminded of their obligation to supplement these disclosures when required under Fed. R. Civ. P.

Case 2:04-cv-01622-GEB-CMK Document 18 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

26(e)(1).

2. Defendant shall complete and notice to be heard any summary judgment

motion by December 13, 2005. 

2. Discovery shall be completed, and all motions pertaining to discovery shall be

noticed to be heard, by February 27, 2006. 

3. Dispositive motions shall be noticed to be heard by April 24, 2006. 

4. The pretrial conference is set for June 5, 2006 at 2:30 a.m. in courtroom # 10. 

Pretrial statements shall be filed pursuant to Local Rule 16-281.

5. Jury trial of this matter is set for August 8, 2006 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom # 10

before the Honorable Garland E. Burrell. The parties shall file trial briefs pursuant to Local Rule

16-285.

DATED: September 21, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01622-GEB-CMK Document 18 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Katy Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, C.
Michael Jacobi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ C. Michael Jacobi
--------------------
C. Michael Jacobi
Chief Executive Officer
April 14, 2003

* A signed of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Katy Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Katy Industries, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 432 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 432

To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate the Nulhegan River 
 and Paul Stream in the State of Vermont for potential addition to the 
    national wild and scenic rivers system, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 15, 2023

Mr. Welch (for himself and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to designate the Nulhegan River 
 and Paul Stream in the State of Vermont for potential addition to the 
    national wild and scenic rivers system, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nulhegan River and Paul Stream Wild 
and Scenic River Study Act of 2023''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT.

    (a) Designation for Study.--Section 5(a) of the Wild and Scenic 
Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(a)) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(147) Nulhegan river and paul stream, vermont.--The 
        following segments:
                    ``(A) The approximately 22-mile segment of the main 
                stem of the Nulhegan River from the headwaters near 
                Nulhegan Pond to the confluence with the Connecticut 
                River, and any associated tributaries (including the 
                North, Yellow, Black, and East Branches).
                    ``(B) The approximately 18-mile segment of Paul 
                Stream from the headwaters on West Mountain to the 
                confluence with the Connecticut River, and any 
                associated tributaries.''.
    (b) Study and Report.--Section 5(b) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers 
Act (16 U.S.C. 1276(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(24) Nulhegan river and paul stream, vermont.--Not later 
        than 3 years after the date on which funds are made available 
        to carry out this paragraph, the Secretary of the Interior 
        shall--
                    ``(A) complete the study of the Nulhegan River and 
                Paul Stream segments in Vermont described in subsection 
                (a)(147); and
                    ``(B) submit to the appropriate committees of 
                Congress a report describing the results of such 
                study.''.
                                 <all>
```