alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF SUNAMERICA INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        12,582,024
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      81,385
<MORTGAGE>                                   1,652,257
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  105,321
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              16,199,784
<CASH>                                         529,363
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         782,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,726,821
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             13,823,702
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                573,335
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    384,549
<COMMON>                                       119,452
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,156,557
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,726,821
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,155,052
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (30,314)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 220,428
<BENEFITS>                                     662,296
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    108,176
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                          (30,034)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                392,027
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,600
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            274,427
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   274,427
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.95
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
No. 50974.

#### Protests 41995-K, etc., of Hutzler Bros. Co. et al. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 49615.

#### Protest 899819-G of California Importing Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel an allowance of 2)4 percent was made by the court on certain Reggiano cheese similar to that involved in Abstracts 42146 and 42309, and an allowance was also made for- the weight of paper or foil, or both, in which certain cheese was wrapped following Abstracts 36724, 38185. Protest sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Nuchols’

Request for Extension of Time

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

STEVEN WILLIAMS SR.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SERGEANT NUCHOLS, et al.,

Defendants.

2:04-cv-1167 LKK PAN P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

NUCHOLS’ REQUEST

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Defendant Nuchols’ first request for an extension of time to file a response to

Plaintiff’s complaint was considered by this Court, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Nuchols has to and including June 23,

2006 within which to file a response.

DATED: May 25, 2006.

/will2067.ext

Case 2:04-cv-01167-LKK -EFB Document 28 Filed 05/26/06 Page 1 of 1
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 20 13 - 0634 Directorate ID : 20 12 - SW - 023 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland Model EC135P2+ and EC135T2+ Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): One Helicopter in the US Registry . Reason : The proposed actions of this AD are intended to prevent metallic debris from damaging the engine, causing loss of engine power, and subsequent loss of helicopter control. Costs :  Inspecting the upper bearing for corrosion, leaki ng grease, condensation or water would require 4 work - hours for a labor cost of $340. No parts would be needed.

 Deactivating the air conditioning system would require 6 work - hours for a labor cost of $510. No parts would be needed. Executive Order 12866 : C ould the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Matt Wilbanks
ex105.htm


    Exhibit 10.5


      


       

      AMR
Corporation

       

       

      


       

       

      July 15, 2008

       

      Mr.
Thomas W. Horton

      4333 Amon
Carter Boulevard

      Fort
Worth, Texas 76155

      


       

      Re:           Employment
Agreement Extension

       

       

      


       

       

      Dear
Tom:

       

       

      You, AMR Corporation and American
Airlines, Inc. are parties (the “Parties”) to an Employment Agreement dated as
of March 29, 2006 (the “Employment Agreement”). The Parties have agreed to
extend the term of the Employment Agreement and to make other conforming changes
as described in this letter.

       

       

      The Employment Agreement is amended as
follows:

       

       

      
        	
                1.  

              	
                In
      Section 2 of the Employment Agreement, the words “third anniversary” are
      replaced with the words “sixth
anniversary”.

              


      

       

       

      
        	
                2.  

              	
                The
      third and fourth sentences of Section 3(b)(iv) are deleted and replaced
      with the following:  “The Executive shall be provided with one
      and one/third additional years of age and service credit for each year
      worked during the first three years of the Employment Period (for up to a
      maximum of 3.9 years of additional age and service credit) for all
      purposes of American’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Program (the
      “SERP”), all with the effect that the Executive shall be deemed to have
      served continuously with American since August 1985.  The
      additional age and service credit under the SERP shall not be provided if
      the Executive’s employment is terminated by American for Cause or by the
      Executive without Good Reason during the first three years of the
      Employment Period.”

              


      

       

       

      Except as expressly amended by this
letter, the Employment Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in
accordance with its terms.

       

       

      If you agree that this letter sets
forth our understanding with regard to the extension of the term of the
Employment Agreement, please sign this letter where indicated
below.

       

       

       

       

      
 

       

      AMR CORPORATION

      


      


      By:_/s/ Gerard J.
Arpey


      


      


      AMERICAN
AIRLINES, INC.

      


      


      


            By:_/s/ Gerard J.
Arpey

______________________

       

      Agreed to
and Accepted:

       

       

      THOMAS W.
HORTON

       

       

      


       

       

      __________________________                                                                                                Dated:
____________________
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH A. SHERMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Respondent.

CIV S-04-1310 LKK KJM P

ORDER

Respondent has sought an application for an extension of time in which to file an answer

to the petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Respondent’s request for an extension of time is granted;

2. The answer is due within thirty days of the date of this order. Petitioner’s traverse,

if any, is due thirty days after the answer is filed.

DATED: April 22, 2005.

Case 2:04-cv-01310-LKK -KJM Document 24 Filed 04/25/05 Page 1 of 1
Meeting with Representative s from the American Home Furnishings Alliance (AHFA) and Ashley Furniture (July 16, 2013)

Attendees: Brian J. Adams (Ashley Furniture) Chris Andresen (AHFA) Robert Courtnage (EPA) Rebecca Edelstein (EPA)

Sara Kemme (EPA) Barbara Nuckles (Ashley Furniture) Bill Purdue (VP Regulatory Affairs, AHFA) Lynn Vendinello (EPA) Eric Winchester (EPA)

At the request of the American Home Furnishings Alliance (AHFA), EPA met with representatives from AHFA and Ashley Furniture on July 1 6 , 2013 to discuss the proposed rule on Formaldehyde Emissions Standar ds for Composite Wood Products. AHFA and Ashley Furniture expressed concerns about the impact on furniture manufactures of including laminated products in the definition of hardwood ply wood . They specifically mentioned concerns about proposed testing and certification requirements and the economic impact this would have on their industry. AHFA and Ashley also provided emission test data on furniture, which EPA has placed in the docket.

EPA encouraged AHFA and Ashley Furniture to submit their comments and recommendations to the public docket in regulations.gov so that EPA can carefully consider and respond to them in

the final rule.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-4001]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Enhanced-Use Lease for Development of Transitional Residential 
Homeless Program at the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 
Butler, PA

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Notice of intent to enter into an enhanced-use lease.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
intends to enter into an enhanced-use lease of approximately 0.46 acres 
including a 6,000-square foot building at the VA Medical Center (VAMC) 
in Butler, Pennsylvania. The selected lessee would develop, finance, 
construct, manage, maintain and operate a transitional residential 
homeless program. The lessee also would be required to provide VA with 
in-kind consideration consisting of construction and improvement work 
on the VAMC campus and services relating to shelter, job preparation, 
and referrals for health care programs needs.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Hackman, Office of Asset 
Enterprise Management (004B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 273-5875.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title 38 U.S.C. section 8161 et seq. 
specifically provides that the Secretary may enter into an enhanced-use 
lease if he determines that the implementation of a business plan 
proposed by the Under Secretary for Health for applying the 
consideration under such a lease to the provision of medical care and 
services would result in a demonstrable improvement of services to 
eligible veterans in the geographic service-delivery area within which 
the property is located. This project meets this requirement.

    Approved: February 27, 2007.
R. James Nicholson,
Secretary of Veterans Affairs.
 [FR Doc. E7-4001 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________

m 99-11106

_______________

THEDRO DIGGLES AND DEBRA ANDERSON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

VERSUS

BOEING DEFENSE & SPACESSIRVING CO.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:97-CV-2524-R)

_________________________

November 14, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and SMITH,

Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The plaintiffs appeal only the award of attorneys’ fees. Having reviewed the briefs, the

record, and the applicable law, and having

heard and considered the oral arguments of

counsel, we conclude that the district court

committed no reversible error. 

Irrespective of whether the court was correct in assigning its reasonsfor the assessment

of fees, it is not reasonably deniable that the

plaintiff-appellants were guilty of gross

misconduct and were subject to sanction on

that ground at least. The judgment,

accordingly, is AFFIRMED.**

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has

determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the

limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4. ** Judge Jolly would reverse as to Anderson.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4027 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
escu_ex1010.htm

 EXHIBIT 10.10
 
 
 
 
 
	 
	1

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	2

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	3

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	4

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	5

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	6

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	7

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	8

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	9

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	10

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	11

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	12

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	13

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	14

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	15

	

	 


 
 
 
	 
	16

	

	 


 
 
 
 
	 17
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




We  have  issued  our  reports  dated  September  19,  2003   accompanying   the
consolidated  financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
Jaco Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,
2003. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the
Registration  Statement  of Jaco  Electronics,  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  on Form
S-8/S-3  (File  No.   33-89994,   effective   March  3,  1995),  as  amended  by
Post-Effective   Amendment  No.  1  to  the   Registration   Statement  of  Jaco
Electronics,  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  on  Form  S-8/S-3  (File  No.  333-49873,
effective April 10, 1998) and the  Registration  Statement of Jaco  Electronics,
Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8/S-3 (File No.  333-49877,  effective April 10,
1998).



/s/ Grant Thornton LLP
----------------------
GRANT THORNTON LLP

Melville, New York
September 19, 2003
No. 52588.

protest 102800-K (New York).

#### Toa Kigyo Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose anything that would warrant disturbing the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES TAYLOR MURRAY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1367 MCE GGH P

vs.

H.D.S.P. MEDICAL CARE, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By an order filed June 10, 2005, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and return

to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant

Brown. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the

court’s order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Brown be dismissed from this

action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

Case 2:04-cv-01367-MCE -GGH Document 33 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

(9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: 10/13/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

murr1367.fusm

Case 2:04-cv-01367-MCE -GGH Document 33 Filed 10/13/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4398 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4398

      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a 
               microemployer pension plan startup credit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2024

 Ms. Hassan (for herself and Mr. Budd) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for a 
               microemployer pension plan startup credit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Retirement Investment in Small 
Employers Act''.

SEC. 2. MICROEMPLOYER PENSION PLAN STARTUP CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Section 45E of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(g) Credit for Microemployers.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of a qualified 
        microemployer--
                    ``(A) subsection (a) shall be applied by 
                substituting `100 percent' for `50 percent', and
                    ``(B) subsection (b)(1) shall be applied by 
                substituting `$2,500' for `$500' in subparagraph (A) 
                thereof.
            ``(2) Qualified microemployer.--For purposes of this 
        subsection, the term `qualified microemployer' means an 
        employer which would be an eligible employer if section 
        408(p)(2)(C)(i)(I) were applied by substituting `10' for `100', 
        but only if the eligible employer plan established or 
        maintained by such employer, under the terms of the plan, 
        accepts payment of the matching contribution under section 
        6433.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2026.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1.c


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-97263 on Form S-3, Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-87190
on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-98781 on Form S-8 and Registration
Statement No. 33-45618 on Form S-8 of Great Plains Energy Incorporated of our
report dated February 27, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion
and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to a change in accounting for
goodwill and other intangible assets), appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of Great Plains Energy Incorporated for the year ended December 31, 2002.


/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
February 27, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.A


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
September 30, 2004, of El Paso Production Holding Company (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Lisa A. Stewart, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ Lisa A. Stewart
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Lisa A. Stewart
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)

                                        December 15, 2004








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Production Holding Company and will be retained by El Paso
Production Holding Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.