alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20000817192043/http://www.census.gov:80/industry/ma36l...

MA36L-ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES

1992

Contact person: Louise Beckett, 301-763-4085

For survey methodology and definitions of terms, see the 1991 publication,

MA36L(91)-1, issued August 1992. Printed data tables will be available

at the end of each data year through an annual compendium publication, which

will include information on all Current Industrial Reports.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

 During 1992, the total value of shipments of electric

lighting fixtures was $4,559.1 million. This represents a

3 percent increase from the 1991 total value of $4,425.9

million. The 1992 figure includes residential type fixtures,

$787.8 million, an increase of 4 percent from 1991;

commercial and institutional type fixtures, $2,206.3 million, an increase of 2 percent from 1991; industrial type

fixtures, $453.3 million, an increase of 2 percent from

1991; and outdoor lighting equipment, $1,111.7 million,

an increase of 5 percent from 1991.

 Vehicular lighting equipment data were discontinued

in 1992.

 A description of the survey methodology and related

information appears on page 6.

Table 1. VALUE OF SHIPMENTS OF ELECTRIC FIXTURES: 1982 TO 1992

(Millions of dollars)

Product

 code Product description 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 

1986 1985 1984 1983 1982

 Electric lighting

 fixtures 1/............. 4,559.1 4,426.0 4,798.2 4,738.0 4,571.8 4,417.8 

4,102.8 3,913.8 3,645.3 3,170.6 2,757.8

 36451 Residential type......... 787.8 760.9 827.6 858.5 877.1 916.1 

844.9 786.8 772.0 640.9 463.9

 36462 Commercial and institu-

 tional type, except

 spotlight............... 2,206.3 2,164.8 2,379.7 2,316.7 2,242.7 2,094.8 

1,940.2 1,832.3 1,685.0 1,453.8 1,253.9

 36463 Industrial type.......... 453.3 446.4 529.4 504.6 430.6 419.1 

400.9 389.2 358.0 328.7 366.9

 36470 Vehicular lighting equip-

 ment.................... (NA) 1,616.1 1,620.7 1,570.5 1,564.4 1,368.5 

1,222.4 1,001.2 925.5 779.4 654.7

 36485 Outdoor lighting equip-

 ment.................... 1,111.7 1,053.9 1,061.5 1,058.2 1,021.4 987.8 

916.8 905.5 830.3 747.2 673.1

 (NA) Not available.

 1/Excludes Product Class 36470, Vehicular Lighting Equipment, which will not be available after

1991.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 4, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00259

- CR

EX PARTE Juan Gabriel COLORADO CARRILLO

From the County Court

, Kinney County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10367CR

Hon orable Roland Andrade

, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice

Juan Gabriel Colorado Carrillo filed an “Emergency Motion for Temporary Stay of

Proceedings” seeking a stay of the trial court proceedings in Cause No. 10367CR, in Kinney

County Court pending this c ourt’s dec ision on his appeal. T he trial in this case is scheduled to

commence on May 9, 2022.

We grant the motion for temporary stay and order all trial court proceedings in Cause

No. 10367CR, in Kinney County Court , including the trial scheduled for May 9, 2022, stayed

pending this c ourt’s decision on this appeal

.

It is so ORDERED on May 4, 2022

.

P ER CURIAM

ATTESTED T O:

__________________________

M ichael A. C ruz

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

The Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste (ACNW) will hold a Planning and Procedures meeting on March 20, 2007, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. The entire meeting will be open to public attendance, with the exception of a portion that may be closed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) and (6) to discuss organizational and personnel matters that relate solely to internal personnel rules and practices of ACNW, and information the release of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

## Tuesday, March 20, 2007—8:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m.

The Committee will discuss proposed ACNW activities and related matters. The purpose of this meeting is to gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee.

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Mr. Antonio F. Dias (Telephone: 301/415-6805) between 8:15 a.m. and 5 p.m. (ET) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted only during those portions of the meeting that are open to the public.

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 8:15 a.m. and 5 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes in the agenda.

Dated: February 27, 2007.

Antonio F. Dias,

Acting Branch Chief, ACNW.

 [FR Doc. E7-3864 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 32(a), Form 10-K

Kansas City Life Insurance Company

KANSAS CITY LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Year Ended 2010

The undersigned certify that the registrants Form 10-K report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.



|                                                                             
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ R. Philip Bixby                                                          
|R. Philip Bixby President,
Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board
|                                                                             
|/s/ Tracy W. Knapp                                                           
|Tracy W. Knapp Senior Vice
President, Finance Date: February 28, 2011
No. 58979.

protest 239001-K (New York).

#### Caron Spinning Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “T. D. 53159 Clean Content per cent” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Training
- What's New with Pay.gov?

# What's New with Pay.gov?

Audience:

Open to all federal employees

----

Location:

Online

----

Duration:

 Wednesday, February 26, 2020 | 10:00 am - 11:00 am ET

----

Cost:

Free

----

Hosted by:

Revenue Collections Management

----

Point of Contact:

ARM@fiscal.treasury.gov

## Event Details:

This webinar will provide an overview of recent Pay.gov enhancements, including the refreshed look of the Pay.gov interface and updates that have been made to our eBilling service. 

Topics will include:

- Overview of the new and improved Pay.gov agency site 
- Review of the eBilling services features and benefits 
- Communication between your agency and Pay.gov for future releases 

Please register using the form below.

 

### Registration Form

Fields marked with an asterisk(*) are required.

Last modified 08/08/21
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3935 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from finalizing, 

implementing, or enforcing the proposed rule, entitled ‘‘Safe and Appropriate Foster Care Placement Requirements for Titles IV–E and IV– 

B’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2024 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mrs. HYDE-SMITH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services 

from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing the proposed 

rule, entitled ‘‘Safe and Appropriate Foster Care Placement Requirements for Titles IV–E and IV–B’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Religious 

5 Freedom for Foster Families Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3935 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RULEMAKING. 

2 The Secretary of Health and Human Services may 

3 not finalize, implement, or enforce the proposed rule, enti4 tled ‘‘Safe and Appropriate Foster Care Placement Re5 quirements for Titles IV–E and IV–B’’ (88 Fed. Reg. 

6 66752; published September 28, 2023), or any substan7 tially similar rule. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 66822.

#### Louis Greenberg & Son, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/24305, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Eord, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65737, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
exhibit10_5.htm


     

    OroAndes
Resource Corp.

     

    


    TERMINATION
AGREEMENT

     

    THIS
AGREEMENT made as of July 8, 2008

     

    BETWEEN:

     

    OROANDES RESOURCE CORP.
(formerly AVALANCHE
MINERALS LTD.), a corporation incorporated under the laws of Canada,
having offices at Suite 910-510 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC, V6C
3A8

     

    (“OroAndes”)

     

    AND:

     

    ALMADORO MINERALS CORP.
(formerly OPES
EXPLORATION INC.), a Nevada corporation having an address at 9620
Williams Road, Richmond, BC, V7A 1H2

     

    (“Almadoro”)

     

    THIS
AGREEMENT witnesses that in consideration of the premises, the sum of $10 now
paid by each of the parties to the other and the mutual covenants and agreements
hereinafter set forth, the parties agree as follows:

     

    
      	
              1.  

            	
              The
      Mining Option Agreement (the “Mining Option Agreement”) between OroAndes
      and Almadoro made as of the 27th
      day of December, 2007 with respect to certain mining claims in Ecuador is
      hereby terminated.  Neither party shall have any further rights
      or obligations under the Mining Option
  Agreement.

            


    

     

    
      	
              2.  

            	
              OreAndes
      shall forthwith refund to Almadoro the sum of $20,000 paid by Almadoro
      under the Mining Option Agreement and Almadoro agrees that no other
      amounts paid by Almadoro under or in connection with the Mining Option
      Agreement are to be refunded or repaid to
it.

            


    

     

    
      	
              3.  

            	
              This
      Agreement is the entire agreement of the parties pertaining to the subject
      matter hereof.

            


    

     

    
      	
              4.  

            	
              This
      Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws
      of the Province of British Columbia and the federal laws of Canada
      applicable therein.

            


    

    


    


    Suite
910- 510 Burrard Street, Vancouver B.C. V6C 3A8

    Phone#
604-662-8186 Fax# 604-662-8170 Email: itranstech@yahoo.com

     

     

    
      
         

      

      
        Page
- 1

        
          

        

      

      
         

      

    

     

     

    THE PARTIES have executed this Agreement as of the date first
above written.

     

     

     

    OROANDES
RESOURCE
CORP.                                                                                                ALMADORO
MINERALS CORP.

    


    By:           /s/
Authorized
Signatory                                                                           By:           /s/
Authorized Signatory

     

    


     

    Authorized
Signatory                                                                                                Authorized
Signatory

    


    


    


    
      
         

      

      
        Page
- 2
# Authority Decisions

- 73 FLRA 839 American Federation of Government Employees, Local 480, Council of Prison Locals #33 (Union) and United States Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Welch, West Virginia (Agency)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 839 Issuance Number: 165Issuance Date: March 29, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5942Arbitrator: Shoub
- 73 FLRA 835 United States Department of Justice, Federal Correctional Complex, Victorville, California (Agency) and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3969, Council of Prison Locals #33 (Union)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 835 Issuance Number: 164Issuance Date: March 22, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5894Arbitrator: Burke
- 73 FLRA 830 Sport Air Traffic Controllers Organization (Union) and United States Department of the Air Force, 412 Test Wing, Edwards Air Force Base, California (Agency)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 830 Issuance Number: 163Issuance Date: March 20, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5929Arbitrator: Monat
- 73 FLRA 827 United States Department of the Army, U.S. Army Garrison, Picatinny Arsenal, New Jersey (Agency) and International Association of Firefighters, Local F-169 (Union)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 827 Issuance Number: 162Issuance Date: March 13, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5864Arbitrator: Herring
- 73 FLRA 822 United States Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service (Agency) and National Treasury Employees Union (Union)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 822 Issuance Number: 161Issuance Date: March 6, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5787Arbitrator: Vaughn
- 73 FLRA 816 National Treasury Employees Union (Union) and Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Agency)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 816 Issuance Number: 160Issuance Date: February 29, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5904Arbitrator: Kaplan
- 73 FLRA 812 Association of Civilian Technicians, Kentucky Long Rifle Chapter 83&nbsp;(Union) and&nbsp;United States Department of the Army, National Guard Bureau, Kentucky Army National Guard (Agency)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 812 Issuance Number: 159Issuance Date: February 29, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5823Arbitrator: Guest
- 73 FLRA 809 United States Department of the Army, Arizona Deparment of Emergency &amp; Military Affairs, Arizona Army National Guard (Agency)&nbsp;and Association of Civilian Technicians, Chapter 61 (Union)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 809 Issuance Number: 158Issuance Date: February 28, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5860Arbitrator: Scholtz
- 73 FLRA 799 United States Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection (Agency) and National Treasury Employees Union (Union)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 799 Issuance Number: 157Issuance Date: February 27, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5836Arbitrator: Mastriani
- 73 FLRA 794 United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Winston-Salem, North Carolina (Agency) and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 25 (Union)Citation Number: 73 FLRA 794 Issuance Number: 156Issuance Date: February 20, 2024Case Number: 0-AR-5923Arbitrator: Flame
Exhibit 99.1
-------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Global Golf Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 28, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ford Sinclair, the
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 21, 2003                         /s/ Ford Sinclair
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Ford Sinclair, President
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 29, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00528

- CV

IN RE VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION ; Valero Refining

- New Orleans, LLC; Valero Refining

- Texas, L.P.; Valero Services, Inc.; Valero Unit Investments, LLC; Valero Retail Holdings, Inc.; Valero Internati onal Holdings, Inc.; and Valero Refining and Marketing Co.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Jason Pulliam, Justice

On August 18 , 2016, R elator filed a petiti on for writ of mandamus. The court has considered the petition and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a). The court’s opinion will issu e at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on September 29, 2016

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my han d and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of September, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle , Clerk

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2011

- CI

- 04253, styled Judith Albarran et al v. Koch Specialty Plant Services, et al , pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Michael E. Mery presiding.
Case 2:05-cr-00240-GEB Document 181 Filed 02/03/2006 Page 1 of 3Case 2:05-cr-00240-GEB Document 181 Filed 02/03/2006 Page 2 of 3Case 2:05-cr-00240-GEB Document 181 Filed 02/03/2006 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
December 31, 1996 Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-K
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                            3215
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    83384
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3069
<INVENTORY>                                     129146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                225961
<PP&E>                                          271095
<DEPRECIATION>                                  165598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  360078
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            60908
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         69674
<OTHER-SE>                                      183182
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    360078
<SALES>                                         447772
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                447772
<CGS>                                           292858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   292858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2707
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                3367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  36622
<INCOME-TAX>                                     13257
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              23365
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     23365
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .87
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order re First Request for an Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

JESSE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. FANNON, et al.,

Defendants.

CIV-S-04-1317 MCE GGH P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF

TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

DISCOVERY REQUESTS

Defendants’ first request for an extension of time to serve discovery responses to

Plaintiff’s request for interrogatories, admissions and production of documents was considered

by this Court and, good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants have 30 days from December 29, 2005,

to and including January 30, 2006, to serve their responses to Plaintiff’s discovery requests.

DATED: 1/6/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

___________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

wash1317.eot.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01317-MCE -GGH Document 44 Filed 01/06/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 61345.

protest 264611-K (New York).

#### Marak Sales Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the importing vessel did, in fact, leave Mexico on April 19, 1954. In view of the stipulation and following Abstract 47519, *United States*v. *Abell Forwarding Co., Inc.,*73 Treas. Dec. 1426, Reap. Dec. 4248, and *Forman*v. *Peaslee,*9 Fed. Cas. 452, it was held that the rate of exchange in effect on the date of exportation, April 19, 1954, should have been used to convert the Mexican currency to American dollars in liquidating the involved entries. ( Accordingly, the protest was sustained, and the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries and make refund accordingly.