alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VAHAN JALADIAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1304 LKK CMK P

vs.

C.A. HUGHES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed a document entitled “first set of interrogators [sic] for

C.A.Hughes, Correctional Counselor I, in according with Rule 33 of the Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure.” Plaintiff is informed that court permission is not necessary for discovery requests

and that neither discovery requests served on an opposing party nor that party’s responses should

be filed until such time as a party becomes dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the

court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties

shall not be filed with the court unless, and until, they are at issue. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 9, 2005 “first set of

interrogators [sic] for C.A.Hughes, Correctional Counselor I, in according with Rule 33 of the

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure” will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff is

cautioned that further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of

Case 2:04-cv-01304-LKK -CMK Document 22 Filed 06/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

court, may result in an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that

this action be dismissed. 

DATED: June 23, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/kf

jala1304.411 

Case 2:04-cv-01304-LKK -CMK Document 22 Filed 06/24/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

VICKI WEST and WENDY FAGUNDES,

individually and on behalf of

others similarly situated,

NO. CIV. S-04-0438 WBS GGH

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE

AND EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS

CIRCLE K STORES, INC.,

Defendant.

----oo0oo----

Stipulation

Plaintiffs Vicki West and Wendy Fagundes, on behalf of

themselves and a proposed class, and defendant Circle K Stores,

Inc., by and through their respective counsel of record, have

agreed to pursue mediation in this case on May 15, 2006 before

the Hon. Richard Neal (Ret.). The parties wish to complete

mediation prior to the hearing on plaintiffs’ motion for class

certification, currently calendared to be heard on April 17,

2006. Accordingly, the parties hereby request the Court to

continue the class certification hearing for forty-five (45) days

Case 2:04-cv-00438-WBS-GGH Document 87 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

to permit adequate time to complete mediation.

Dated: April 10, 2006 DEWEY BALLANTINE LLP

By:__________________

Matthew M. Walsh

Attorneys for Defendant

Circle K Stores, Inc.

Dated: April 10, 2006 McINERNEY & JONES

By:__________________

Charles A. Jones

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and

the Proposed Class

O R D E R

Based upon the foregoing stipulation of the parties,

and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that the hearing

on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification shall be continued

to June 12, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5. 

Regardless of this order, however, the court still

requests that the parties appear on April 17, 2006, at 1:30 p.m.

in Courtroom 5 as previously scheduled. On April 3, 2006,

defendant filed two objections to plaintiffs’ requests for

judicial notice, eleven objections to statements in the

declarations of named plaintiffs Vicki West and Wendy Fagundes

(submitted in support of plaintiffs’ motion), and one objection

to excerpts from the deposition of Robert Crandall. Defendant’s

objections are made primarily on the grounds that the statements

at issue constitute inadmissable personal opinions of lay

witnesses (inappropriate expert testimony), or are conclusory,

lacking in foundation, argumentative, and/or speculative. To

rule on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, the court

must first decide these objections and, in the interest of

Case 2:04-cv-00438-WBS-GGH Document 87 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

avoiding further delay if and when the court finally hears

plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, the court thinks it

best to consider these objections sooner rather than later. 

Accordingly, at the hearing currently set for April 17, 2006, at

1:30 p.m., the court will hear only the evidentiary objections. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 11, 2006

Case 2:04-cv-00438-WBS-GGH Document 87 Filed 04/11/06 Page 3 of 3
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON D.C .. 20460 

June 24, 2015 

MEMORANDUM 

OffiCE; QF 

Ctf£MIC'.l WETY AXO ~llllOH 

PR(\'(H rtOH 

SUBJECT: FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) Waiver Request for the Final Rule: 

FROM: 

Revisions to Minimum Risk Exemption (SAN 5183.1) 

Laura E. Bailey. Supervisor/Executive Secretary ~(A.. fk'£~. FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (7201M) {)(gA r --v 

TO: Jack Housenger, Director 

Office of Pesticide Programs (7501P) 

The FIFRA SAP waives scientific review and comment on the final rule entitled. 

"Revisions to Minimum Risk Exemption." The purpose of the final rule is to: more 

clearly specify the active and inert ingredients permitted in minimum risk pesticide 

products that are exempt from federal registration under the Federal Insecticide. 

Fungicide. and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA); require that manufacturers of these products 

list these ingredients in a clear and specified way on the product labels, and include the 

manufacturer's company name and contact information on the label. The proposed 

revisions are administrative in nature and do not contain scientific issues that require 

the SAP's consideration. 

Attachment 

cc: Ryne Yarger/FEAD (7506P) 

Kathy Davis/FEAD (7506P) 
Juno 5. lOIS 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20460 

orne£ Of CH£\.OC.Al WUY 

A.'\10 POt.U.ITlCN PFif'o't;KT'XIt i 

SUBJECf: Request fOr Waiver of the FIFRA Sci~."n ic ,\ dvisory Panel's (SAP) Review of 

the f inal Rule: Revisions to Minimum Risk Exemption (SAN 5183.1) 

R0~1: l..1um E. Bailey. M.S .. Executive Scc~ 1)' 

FI FRA Scicntilic Advisory Pand 

TO: Stephen J. Klainc. Ph.D .. Choir 

FI FRA Scientific Advisory Panel 

Attached is the tinn.l rule entitled -RC\'isions to linimum Risk Exemption", The purpose 

of the lin.n1 rule is to: more clearly specify the :1ctivc ond inert ingn:dicnts pcnnith.-d in minimum 

risk pesticide product$ th:tt ::m: exempt from fcdcrnl rcgistrntion under the Fcdcml Insecticide. 

Fungicide. and Rodenticide Act {FIFRA): require that m:muf:.cturers of these products list these 

ingredients in :1. ciC'.ar :md sp..."Cilied \\'3)' on tlh! product labels. OJ1d indudc the manufacturer's 

comp3.ny name and con met infom1:ttion on the l:tbcl. These ch;mgcs will pro,•ide compli:mce 

detcm1inations by states. tribes, and the EPA. No ingr. .. '<licnL.r; are b!:ins :t.dded or remo,·cd from 

the minimum risk exemption in this rukmaking. 

The Agency requests that the f lfRA Scientili e Advisory Panel (SA£') waive its review of 

this linal rule bo.."'Causc the clarilication and restructuring of the cum:nt regulJtions arc 

administr.tti\'C in n:llurc and conlain no scientific issues that w:mant rt\•icw by the SAP. 

Ple;asc indicate below whether you concur with this requ est. and I will notify the Agency 

uccordingly. 

ECOMMEN TI : 

The flf RA Scientific Advisory Panel wah·cs scientific rt\•icw ttnd comment on the final 

rule entitled ''Revisions to rvtinimum Risk Exemption". The final rule dOC$ not conlllin scie-ntific 

ssu~o.'S that warrant review by the ll,1nel. 

Concur 

Non-Concur---------------- (Dorc)
**Publications |  PCSD HomeLessons Learned from Collaborative Approaches
NEW NATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES TASK FORCEFinal Draft
**
1 From: Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:43 PM To: RedHill; webmail@doh.hawaii.gov Subject: red hill fuel leak

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

Please route this correspondence to all officials invol ved in drafting the agreement for the plan to contain further contamination of groundwater.

If prudent measures aren’t implemen ted swiftly and aggressively, the cost in dollars, public health and the reputation of all agencies involved stand to suffer greatly. It will be much more costly to address in the future if insufficient stopgap measures are taken.

The present plan calling for “further study, more frequent testing and yet-to-be-determined upgrades to all 20 tanks over 20 years” falls woefully short of the appropr iate response needed to pr otect aquifers which supply residents from Moanalua to Hawaii Kai.

What is the role of the agencies and officials involved if not to work toge ther on damage control on matters like these? If this is not addressed with decisive, swift and aggressive action, you will all be dealing with a much bigger problem in the future. You will be held accountab le for many years to come for the decisions you make

now.

Respectfully,
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3217]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12580-001]


Shenango Dam Hydroelectric Company, LLC; Notice of Surrender of 
Preliminary Permit

February 16, 2007.
    Take notice that Shenango Dam Hydroelectric Company, LLC, permittee 
for the proposed Shenango Dam Project, has requested that its 
preliminary permit be terminated. The permit was issued on August 18, 
2005, and would have expired on July 31, 2008.\1\ The project would 
have been located on the Shenango River in Mercer County, Pennsylvania.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 112 FERC ]62,154.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The permittee filed the request on February 6, 2007, and the 
preliminary permit for Project No. 12580 shall remain in effect through 
the thirtieth day after issuance of this notice unless that day is a 
Saturday, Sunday, part-day holiday that affects the Commission, or 
legal holiday as described in section 18 CFR 385.2007, in which case 
the effective date is the first business day following that day. New 
applications involving this project site, to the extent provided for 
under 18 CFR Part 4, may be filed on the next business day.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3217 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT
      32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
      officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such
      officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
      Quarterly Report on
      Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
      (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
      (subject to the Company's position prevailing in regard to the remaining
      unresolved SEC comment, as more fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the
      information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
              November 9, 2007BY: 
              /s/ Leo Liebowitz(Signature)LEO
              LIEBOWITZChairman
                and Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Kenneth H. Traub,certify that:

(1)       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof American Bank Note Holographics, Inc.;

(2)       Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

(3)       Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

(4)       The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))for the registrant and have:

a.    Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.    Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.    Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)       The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a.    Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b.    Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: May 15, 2006 |   | /s/ Kenneth H. Traub                  |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                    |   | Kenneth H. Traub                      |
|                    |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
AMENDED AND RESTATED  CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
 Company Executive
    Effective Date
   Definitions and Interpretation Rules
 Defined Terms
 Accrued Obligations
 Additional Obligations
  Affiliate 




---



##### 



 Assets 
  the Company 
  Base Compensation  including excluding Base Compensation
  Beneficial Owner  Beneficial Ownership
  Board 
  Cause 
  Change in Control 
  -2-




---



##### 



Asset Sale unless
     Code 
  Committee  Committee provided however
  Company 
 -3-




---



##### 



 Disability 
  Effective Date 
  Employee 
  Employment Termination Date 
  Entity 
  ERISA 
  Exchange Act 
  Excise Tax 
  Executive 
 Expiration Date
  Good Reason  Change in Control Potential Change in Control
    -4-




---



##### 



 Gross-Up Payment 
 -5-




---



##### 



 Highest Base Compensation 
 Incumbent Director 
    Incumbent Directors
   IRS 
  Merger 
  Pension Plan 
  Perquisites 
  Person 
 Potential Change in Control 
   -6-




---



##### 



 Section 409A 
  Section 409A Disability   Section 409A Disability 
  Separation From Service 
  Specified Employee 
  Specified Owner 
      -7-




---



##### 



 Termination of Employment 
  Termination of Employment
  Voting Securities 
 Number and Gender
 Term of Agreement
 Term Expiration Date
 Compensation
 Equity Based Compensation
 -8-




---



##### 



Benefits Following Termination of Employment
 Severance Payment Based Upon Base Compensation
 Pension Plan
 Accident and Health Insurance Benefits Continuation Period
 -9-




---



##### 



Perquisites
 Retiree Medical
 Interest Amount Interest Amount
 -10-




---



##### 



Gross-Up Payments Total Payments Gross-Up Payment
 Tax Counsel Auditor
   -11-




---



##### 



Legal Fees
 -12-




---



##### 



Time of Benefits Payments
 Termination Procedures And Compensation During Dispute
 Notice of Termination Notice of Termination
 Employment Termination Date Employment Termination Date Employment
Termination Date
 Dispute Concerning Termination
 -13-




---



##### 



Compensation During Dispute
 Withholding
 Death of the Executive
 Amendment
 Miscellaneous
 Agreement Not an Employment Contract
  -14-




---



##### 



Alienation Prohibited
 Severability
 Binding Effect
 Settlement of Disputes Concerning Benefits Under this Agreement; Arbitration AAA
 -15-




---



##### 



No Mitigation
 Other Amounts Due
 Notices
 -16-




---



##### 



Disputed Payments and Refusals to Pay
 Funding Rabbi
Trust
 Governing Law
 Compliance With Section 409A .
 Entire Agreement
 -17-




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 FURMANITE CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Howard C. WadsworthName:
    Howard C. WadsworthDate:
    December 31, 2008Title:
    Senior Vice PresidentEXECUTIVEBy:
    /s/ Michael L. RoseAddress:      2435 N Central ExpresswayRichardson, Texas 75080 -18-
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1394 Prepped by Ollie Stewart

Document

Number: 

# 9 ) ll-B- 4 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/3/2008 7:22:10 AM

Sheet 9 of 57P. 2
Docke tNo . A'4A-S2- Categor y JT ' S Th e followin g infonnatio

n i s locate d i

n th e confidentia l file s o

f th e Director , Emissio

n Standard

s Division , Offic e o

f Ai r Qualit

y Plannin g an d . Standards , li . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency

, Researc h Triangle Park

, Nort h Carolin a 27711 . Thi

s Informatio

n i s confidential pendin g final determinatio

n b y th e Administratoran

d i s no tavailabl e fo rpubli c inspection .

on A«y">+ i°jtm>-
-J: ecr /*? <*} /brtf wfst y f, y/rs COr> jr

*"*i'«r J" 

### a 4-0 pay* l^'f

*" W
';•'/•'*•• ' l ^ ."JH" Ts
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 42-6 Filed 12/18/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 42-6 Filed 12/18/2003 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2
                         GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Genesis HealthCare Corporation (the "Company") does hereby certify
with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date: February 13, 2004                    James V. McKeon
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           James V. McKeon
                                           Chief Financial Officer


     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL ANTHONY WESBECHER,

Petitioner,

v.

DANIEL FOY,

Respondent.

CIV S-04-0807 FCD CMK

ORDER

This Court hereby grants Respondent’s requests for an enlargement of time by

thirty (30) additional days, for Respondent to file a responsive brief on or before September 15,

2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

DATED: August 16, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00807-FCD-CMK Document 26 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 1
M14004 – Chemical 4 

Part II, Section A.2 and A.3 – Industrial Sites Controlled by Submitter 

Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release and Disposal Page 1 of 1 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0101 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 042 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GMBH (ECD) Model MBB - BK 117 C - 1 and C - 2 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 108 He licopters in the US Registry . Reason : This AD is being proposed by the failure of a “few” engines to reach the specified one engine - inoperative (OEI) rating at altitudes above 10,000 feet. Costs : Parts per Helicopter Flight check (54 estimated) $ 0 $1,000 each Labor per Helicopter ( 1 x $ 8 5 /work-hour) $ 85 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 1,085 Total US Fleet Cost $ 63,180 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulato ry Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : 

### Ed Cuevas
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

MARCUS WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAVID TRISTAN, et al.,

Defendants.

NO. 2:04-CV-1343 FCD CMK P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ FIRST

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO RESPOND TO

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Good cause appearing, Defendants are granted a 30-day extension of time to respond

to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s complaint shall be due on or before

Monday, November 6, 2006.

October 11, 2006

/s/ CRAIG M. KELLISON 

Craig M. Kellison

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:04-cv-01343-FCD-CMK Document 25 Filed 10/12/06 Page 1 of 1