alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20010109084100/http://www.census.gov:80/industry/ma36l...

MA36L -- ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES

1993

Contact person: Belva Kirk (301) 763-4132

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

 During 1993, the total value of shipments of electric lighting fixtures was $5,045.5 million. 

This represents a 7 percent

increase from the 1992 total value of $4,720.1 million. The 1993 figure includes residential type

fixtures, $994.8 million,

an increase of 11 percent from 1992; commercial and institutional type fixtures, $2,340.8 million,

an increase of 5 percent

from 1992; industrial type fixtures, $480.6 million, an increase of 9 percent from 1992; and

outdoor lighting equipment,

$1,229.3 million, an increase of 6 percent from 1992.

 Vehicular lighting equipment data were discontinued in 1992.

Table 1. VALUE OF SHIPMENTS OF ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES: 1984 TO 1993

(Millions of dollars)

Product

 code Product description 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 

1986 1985 1984

 Electric lighting

 fixtures/1................. 5,045.5 r/4,720. 4,426.0 4,798.2 4,738.0 4,571.8 4,417.8 

4,102.8 3,913.8 3,645.3

36451 Residential type............ 994.8 r/898.2 760.9 827.6 858.5 877.1 916.1 

844.9 786.8 772.0

36462 Commercial and institutional

 type (except spotlight)... 2,340.8 2,221.2 2,164.8 2,379.7 2,316.7 2,242.7 2,094.8 

1,940.2 1,832.3 1,685.0

36463 Industrial type............. 480.6 442.1 446.4 529.4 504.6 430.6 419.1 

400.9 389.2 358.0

36470 Vehicular lighting equipment (NA) (NA) 1,616.1 1,620.7 1,570.5 1,564.4 1,368.5 

1,222.4 1,001.2 925.5

36485 Outdoor lighting equipment.. 1,229.3 1,158.6 1,053.9 1,061.5 1,058.2 1,021.4 987.8 

916.8 905.5 830.3

 r/ Revised by 5 percent or more from previously published data.

 1/ Excludes Product Class 36470, Vehicular Lighting Equipment, which will not be available after

1991. (NA) Not

 available.

Table 2. QUANTITY AND VALUE OF SHIPMENTS OF ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES: 1993 AND 1992

(Quantity in 1,000 units; value in $1,000)

 No. 1993 

1992

 Product of

 code Product description cos. Quantity Value 

Quantity Value

 36451 -- Electric lighting fixtures, residential type.............. 120 (X) 994,787 

(X) r/898,179

 Incandescent, excluding PAR lampholders and

 floodlights:

 Interior, including bath or kitchen:

 36451 11 Ceiling or pendant.................................. 78 17,788 a/328,522 

18 532 303 857
EX-23.c
Consent of Independent Auditors

                         Independent Accountants' Consent



The Board of Directors
Kansas City Life Insurance Company:


We  consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration   statement
(No.2-07351)  on Form S-8 of Kansas  City Life  Insurance  Company of our report
dated March 20, 2001,  relating to the  financial  statements  and  supplemental
schedule of the Kansas City Life  Insurance  Company  Savings and Profit Sharing
Plan,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 11-K
of Kansas City Life Insurance Company.

                                    KPMG LLP


Omaha, Nebraska
March 23, 2001
(ppb) Chronic

SARs

SAR Class

New Chemcial Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair:
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2001 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:
                October
                16, 2006
            By:
            */s/
              Jay P. Nash*Name:Jay
                P. NashTitle:Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Request for Dismissal and Order Thereon Sanford v. Roseville Cycle, Inc., et al.

 CIV. S-04-1114 DFL CMK

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

STEPHEN E. HORAN, SBN 125241

JEFFREY D. CHRISTENSEN, SBN 226716

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

650 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, CA 95825 

Telephone: (916) 929-1481

Facsimile: (916) 927-3706

Attorneys for Defendant 

ROSEVILLE CYCLE, INC. 

and SACRAMENTO MOTOR SPORTS, INC.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES SANFORD,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROSEVILLE CYCLE, INC.; SACRAMENTO

MOTOR SPORTS; CYNTHIA JOHNSTON;

and DOES 1 through 10.

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV. S-04-1114 DFL CMK

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON AS TO

DEFENDANTS ROSEVILLE CYCLE

INC. AND SACRAMENTO MOTOR

SPORTS, INC. ONLY

Case 2:04-cv-01114-JAM-CMK Document 19 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Request for Dismissal and Order Thereon Sanford v. Roseville Cycle, Inc., et al.

- 2 - CIV. S-04-1114 DFL CMK

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES:

Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Release between plaintiff, James

Sanford, and defendants, Roseville Cycle Inc. And Sacramento Motor Sports, Inc., the

parties hereby request that Roseville Cycle Inc. And Sacramento Motor Sports, Inc.

ONLY be dismissed with prejudice from the above-entitled action.

Nothing is this Request for Dismissal shall be construed to affect plaintiff’s

complaint and claims in the above-referenced case against defendants other than

defendants Roseville Cycle Inc. And Sacramento Motor Sports, Inc.

Dated: November 9, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

/s/ Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD, IV 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: September 7, 2005 PORTER SCOTT WEIBERG & DELEHANT

Signature On File

STEPHEN HORAN, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendants Roseville Cycle Inc.

And Sacramento Motor Sports, Inc.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S04-1114 DFL CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice as to Roseville Cycle Inc. and

Sacramento Motor Sports, Inc. only.

Dated: 11/10/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01114-JAM-CMK Document 19 Filed 11/14/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Request for Dismissal and Order Thereon Sanford v. Roseville Cycle, Inc., et al.

- 3 - CIV. S-04-1114 DFL CMK

Case 2:04-cv-01114-JAM-CMK Document 19 Filed 11/14/05 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRCATED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         343,648
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  641,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     79,869
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,138,823
<PP&E>                                          12,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,153,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          792,804
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,462
<OTHER-SE>                                     328,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,153,998
<SALES>                                      2,178,859
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,178,859
<CGS>                                        1,237,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,237,475
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,044,253
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,086)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,334
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (109,420)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (109,420)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.011)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.010)



</TABLE>
No. 55913.

protests 150054-K/13008, etc. (New Orleans).

#### Frederick Stearns & Company, Frederick Stearns & Company Division of Sterling Drug, Inc., Successor *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of liver concentrate the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in Abstract 55240. The cited case found that the liver concentrate was an uncompounded, inedible substance, containing no alcohol and possessing a therapeutic element making the product available as a remedy for anemia, and that the grinding of the liver into powdered form to produce the imported commodity was a process that advanced the merchandise beyond what was necessary to prevent deterioration, thereby removing the drug from a crude state and bringing it into an advanced condition. Accordingly, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1317 MCE GGH P

vs.

J. FANNON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve a response to

defendants’ May 15, 2006 request for an extension of time to take plaintiff’s deposition and to

extend the time for filing dispositive motions. On May 24, 2006, the court granted defendants’

motion. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion is denied. The court will grant plaintiff an extension of

ten days to file a request for reconsideration of the May 24, 2006, order.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's June 7, 2006 application for an extension of time is denied;

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01317-MCE -GGH Document 59 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file a request for

reconsideration of the May 24, 2006, order. 

DATED: 6/19/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:mp; wash1317.36

Case 2:04-cv-01317-MCE -GGH Document 59 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORIO PORTILLA JUAREZ,

Petitioner,

 v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, Attorney

General,

Respondent.

No. 15-71903

Agency No. A205-527-967

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2017** 

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Gregorio Portilla Juarez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of

removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

FILED

FEB 22 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
questions of law and claims of due process violations. Mohammed v. Gonzales,

400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err by denying Portilla Juarez’s application for cancellation

of removal, where he lacked any qualifying relatives at the time of his final

removal hearing. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229b(b)(1)(D) (an applicant for cancellation of

removal must establish the requisite hardship to a “spouse, parent or child”),

1101(b)(1) (“The term ‘child’ means an unmarried person under twenty-one years

of age . . . .”). Portilla Juarez’s contentions that the agency erred in relying on

Matter of Isidro-Zamorano, 25 I. & N. Dec. 829, 829 (BIA 2012), in determining

his daughter was not a qualifying relative and should have applied the dictionary

definition of child are foreclosed by our decision in Mendez-Garcia v. Lynch, 840

F.3d 655, 663-65 (9th Cir. 2016) (deferring to the BIA’s conclusion in Matter of

Isidro-Zamorano that an applicant for cancellation of removal must show hardship

to qualifying relative at the time the IJ adjudicates the application, and rejecting

petitioner’s argument that agency should have used dictionary definition); Lata v.

INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000). We are not persuaded by Portilla

Juarez’s contention that Matter of Isidro-Zamorano is distinguishable. 

Portilla Juarez’s contentions that his due process rights were violated

because he had an alleged settled expectation that he could receive cancellation of

2 15-71903
removal, or because the agency did not adjudicate his application for relief before

his daughter turned twenty-one are also foreclosed by Mendez-Garcia, 840 F.3d at

665-69. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

3 15-71903
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

JAMES P. DeFAZIO, et al.,

NO. CIV. S-04-1358 WBS GGH

NO. CIV. S-05-0559 WBS GGH

Plaintiffs, NO. CIV. S-05-1726 WBS GGH

CONSOLIDATED 

v. ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION

HOLLISTER, INC.; et al.,

Defendants.

 ----oo0oo----

In light of the letter from plaintiff’s counsel

received on November 19, 2007, plaintiffs are granted leave to

file a Motion for Clarification of this court’s November 1, 2007

order. Such motion shall be filed within fourteen (14) calendar

days from the date of this order and noticed for hearing on the

court’s next available law and motion calendar consistent with

the provisions of Local Rule 78-230(b). The time for plaintiffs

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 302 Filed 11/21/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

to file a fourth amended complaint is hereby extended to ten (10)

days after the hearing on the Motion for Clarification.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 21, 2007

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 302 Filed 11/21/07 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>       DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>            DEC-31-1998

<CASH>                          10,498,060 
<SECURITIES>                          0    
<RECEIVABLES>                         0    
<ALLOWANCES>                          0    
<INVENTORY>                           0    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                10,498,060 
<PP&E>                                0    
<DEPRECIATION>                        0    
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  10,498,060 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 0    
<BONDS>                               0    
<COMMON>                              0    
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0    
<PREFERRED>                           0    
<OTHER-SE>                      10,498,060 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    10,498,060 
<SALES>                          3,273,899 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 3,570,109 
<CGS>                                 0    
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    1,485,642 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   514,293 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0    
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 195,214 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  1,374,960 
<INCOME-TAX>                          0    
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                794,940 
<DISCONTINUED>                   3,493,807 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    (41,166)
<CHANGES>                             0    
<NET-INCOME>                     4,247,581 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        92.06 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        92.06 

        



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARIN DEMETRIUS GREENE, No. 2:04-cv-0917-MCE-DAD-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 24, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which

were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections

to the findings and recommendations and defendant has filed a reply.

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-00917-MCE -DAD Document 72 Filed 09/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304,

this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file,

the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 24, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant’s September 27, 2005 motion for summary judgment is granted;

and

3. This action is dismissed.

DATED: September 18, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00917-MCE -DAD Document 72 Filed 09/18/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

March 31, 1949

No. 52981.

#### New York Auction Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 140914-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
Before the Third Division,

February 16, 1945

No. 50029.

#### Protests 985967-G, etc., of Hosada Bros. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same-as that passed upon in *Mutual Supply Co.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 136, C. D. 842), the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular" 		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection VII 

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"December 2018
Exhibit 32.2 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 Of The United States Code I, Ernest J. Mrozek, the
Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify
that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007,
fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of The ServiceMaster Company. /s/ Ernest J. MrozekErnest J. MrozekVice Chairman and Chief
 Financial OfficerAugust 9, 2007 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The
ServiceMaster Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 52
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000540 02-DEC-2015 07:54 AM
# sec6_rsonp_2021

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSOCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2021
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 84 Filed 09/29/2004 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 84 Filed 09/29/2004 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 84 Filed 09/29/2004 Page 3 of 3
No. 61344.

protests 210589-K, etc. (New York).

#### Koscherak Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

*491Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.