alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
.' FORT

10VA DODGE--:~

March 19, 2014

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer

Chief, Essential Air Service Division

Office of Aviation Analysis

US Department of Transportation

400 7thSt. SW

Washington, D.C. 20050

RE: Request for Comments for Essential Air Service Proposals Submitted February 21, 2014

DOCKETDOT-OST-2001-10682; Fort Dodge

DOCKETDOT-OST-2001-10684; Mason City

On behalf of both of our communities, we respectfully request that the DOT reject both ofthe submitted

proposals, and allow for another solicitation of proposals with a six week submittal period.

The reason is we wish to explore all opportunities with air carriers on proposals that meet the needs of our

communities.

In addition, we have the following concerns with the two proposals submitted:

• Great Lakes Aviation, LTD.

o Concerns with past experience regarding unreliabilitv and non-competitive fares.

• Multi-Aero Inc. d/b/a/ Air Choice One

o Concerns with utilizing a single engine aircraft as opposed to a twin engine aircraft and the effect

that has on the duration of the flight.

Both of our communities were able to support larger seat aircraft with more available annual seats. We are

concerned with the language of 49 USC41742 which could jeopardize our ability to receive twin-engine aircraft if we

have single-engine aircraft service for 60 consecutive days. It is counterproductive to the long term development and

success of air service to keep reducing the seat capacities at our communities.

Respectively,

Eric Bookmeyer

Mayor of Mason City

Matt Bemrich

Mayor of Fort Dodge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AS OF
AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000054003
<NAME> EARLE M. JORGENSEN CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          20,763
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  105,704
<ALLOWANCES>                                       406
<INVENTORY>                                    180,403
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               310,148
<PP&E>                                         160,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 443,821
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          153,648
<BONDS>                                        310,734
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,919)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   443,821
<SALES>                                      1,050,005
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,050,005
<CGS>                                          755,381
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  755,381
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   414
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,059
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,708
<INCOME-TAX>                                       873
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             24,855
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  9,075
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,760
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-88,825-01
EX P ARTE GREG ORY LOPEZ , Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. CR2012-396- 2 IN THE 207T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM COMAL COUNTY
Per curiam . O PI N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Art i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual abuse of a young child and sentenc ed to fifty year s’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Lopez v. State , No. 03-13-00852- CR (Tex. App.—Austin Oct. 1, 2015) (not designated f

or publication). Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to notify him that his conviction had been aff irmed. Appellate counsel filed an aff idavit. Ba s ed o n that aff

idavit, the trial court has enter ed2

finding s of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to notify Applicant that his conviction was aff

irm ed. The trial court rec ommends that relief be grante d. Ex parte W ilson , 956 S.W .2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionar

y revie w of the judgme nt of the Third Co urt o f Ap p ea ls in cause number 03-13- 00852-CR that aff

irmed his conviction in cause number CR2012-396 from the 207th District Court of Comal County
. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionar y review with this Court within 30 day s of the dateon which this Court’s mandate issues.

Deliver ed: September 12, 2018 Do not publish
No. 54644.

#### J. & H. Baer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 133651-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Curative Health Services, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JohnC. Prior, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

1.     The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.     The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/    | John C. Prior           |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   |   | John C. Prior           |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | May 22, 2006            |

 

----
No. 52247.

protests 511171-G, etc. (New York).

#### Van Raalte Co. *v.*United States,

*293Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDEDMarch 31, 2011
    
    
    March 31, 2010MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST V
    
    
    FUNDING V, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST V
    
    
    FUNDING V, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    15,949
    
    
    $
    18,582
    
    
    $
    15,949
    
    
    $
    18,582Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    15,470
    
    
    
    15,949
    
    
    
    15,470
    
    
    
    15,949Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    15,470
    
    
    $
    15,949
    
    
    $
    15,470
    
    
    $
    15,949Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
ERRATA FOR 

Poeter, E. P., and Hill, M. C., 1998, 

Documentation of UCODE, A Computer Code for Universal Inverse Modeling: 

U.S. Geological Survey water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4080, 116p. 

6/30/99 

Page Correction

8 and 9 In both equations 1 and 2, the quantities in the denominator on the right-hand side 

should be scalars instead of vectors. Vectors are indicated now because of the bold 

type. The denominator on the right-hand side of equation 1 should be ∆b; the

denominator of equation 2 should be 2∆b. 

22 

(relates to 

change 

on p. 48-

50) 

Replace fn with temp in the filenames with suffixes u44, p44, f44, e44, u45, p45, f45, 

e45. So, the list of filenames should be: 

 temp.u44, temp.p44, temp.f44, temp.e44, 

 temp.u45, temp.p45, temp.f45, temp.e45 

48-50 For PHASE=44, include the following sentence before item 1: 

Copy or rename temp.u44 to fn.u44, temp.e44 to fn.e44, temp.p44 to fn.p44 and, 

if used, temp.f44 to fn.f44. 

For PHASE=45, include the following sentence before item 1: 

Copy or rename temp.u45 to fn.u45, temp.e45 to fn.e45, temp.p45 to fn.p45 and, 

if used, temp.f45 to fn.f45. 

48 In the last line of text, 45 should be 44. 

26, 30, 78 The variable SOSR is identical to variable SOSC of MODFLOWP. 

55 The first sentence on the fourth line from the bottom should read: 

 Generally, the user does not access the latter file. 

56, 

Table 3 

Second row after titles. In the right-hand column, the first sentence should read 

“The maximum and minimum weighted residuals...” 

The second sentence should be deleted. 

57, 

Table 4 

In the fourth row from the bottom, the text in right column which now reads 

“Confidence intervals on” should read “Standard deviations for”.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service 

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Intergovernmental Advisory Committee (IAC), Northwest Forest Plan (NWFP), has scheduled a meeting on March 20, 2007 from 8 a.m. to 12 noon. at the DoubleTree Hotel & Executive Meeting Center, 1000 NE Multnomah, Portland, Oregon 97232, (503) 281-6111, in the Multnomah Conference room. We will provide participants with updates on several ongoing projects of interest including monitoring, agency plan revisions, research activities, etc. 

The meeting is open to the public and fully accessible for people with disabilities. A 10-minute time slot is reserved for public comments at 8:10 a.m. Interpreters are available upon request at least 10 days prior to the meeting. Written comments may be submitted for the meeting record. Interested persons are encouraged to attend. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Questions regarding this meeting may be directed to Kath Collier, Management Analyst, Regional Ecosystem Office, 333 SW. First Avenue, P.O. Box 3623, Portland, OR 97208 (telephone: 503-808-2165). 

Dated: February 20, 2007. 

Anne Badgley, 

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. E7-3564 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
**EXHIBIT 32.2**
**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc.(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004(the Report), I, Christopher J. Zyda, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.
Date: November 9, 2004   By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZYDA  Christopher J. Zyda Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and will be retained byLuminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John
Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)
            The
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      May 10, 2010
              By:
              /s/ John ChenJohn
      Chen
                Chief
      Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN ELLIS, No. CIV S-04-1483-LKK-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

ALBONICO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s January 10, 2006, order denying appointment of counsel.

Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 72-303(b), “rulings by

Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within ten

court days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties.” Here, the motion for

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order was filed on April 19, 2006, which is more than

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-01483-LKK -CMK Document 49 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1 Pursuant to Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988), for pro se prisoner litigants

seeking reconsideration, the court has calculated the 10-day period from the date the motion was

delivered to prison authorities for mailing to the court. Otherwise, the 10-day period has been

calculated based on the date the motion for reconsideration was actually filed. 

2

10 days from the date of service of the magistrate judge’s order.1

 The motion is, therefore,

untimely.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is

denied as untimely.

DATED: July 17, 2006.

 

Lawrence K. Karlton

Senior Judge

U.S. District Court

Case 2:04-cv-01483-LKK -CMK Document 49 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DWAYNE EICHLER,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-1108-GEB-JFM-P

vs.

CDC OFFICER SHERBURN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 29, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Defendants

have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01108-GEB-JFM Document 126 Filed 11/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 29, 2006 are adopted in

full;

2. The July 24, 2006 motion for summary judgment filed by defendants Sherburn

and Lebeck is denied (Docket No. 103); and

3. This action is remanded to the magistrate judge for further scheduling order.

Dated: October 31, 2006

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01108-GEB-JFM Document 126 Filed 11/01/06 Page 2 of 2
NUMBER 13-14-00492-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE PENSION ADVISORY GROUP, INC. AND

PAUL D. HINSON

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Relators, Pension Advisory Group, Inc. and Paul D. Hinson, filed a petition for writ 

of mandamus in the above cause on September 2, 2014. Through this original 

proceeding, relators seek to: (1) compel the trial court to withdraw its order overruling 

relators’ objections to and affirming an omnibus order issued by the special master, and 

(2) grant a de novo hearing and determination on the issues addressed by that order. 

The Court requests that the real parties in interest, Fidelity Security Life Insurance 

Company and David Smith, or any others whose interest would be directly affected by the 
2

relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the 

expiration of seven days from the date of this order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

4th day of September, 2014.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Sherwood Brands, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Uziel Frydman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted
pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



Dated:
December 10, 2002

| |  | /s/UZIEL FRYDMANUziel Frydman
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 102

Unemployed

Number in thousands

70 to 74 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU03024941Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Unemployment Level - 70-74 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:10:13 PM)
Exhibit 32.2 - Certifications

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the quarterly  report of General Steel  Holdings,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Commission on August 15, 2005 (the "Report"),  I, John Chen,  Director and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

                                         By: /s/ John Chen
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            John Chen
                                            Director and Chief Financial Officer


DATED: August 15, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           5,178
<SECURITIES>                                    95,178
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                       210
<INVENTORY>                                        328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               109,064
<PP&E>                                           7,947
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,687
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 124,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,864
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   124,818
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                57,738
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   36,201
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   763
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  39
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,761
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,091
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,670
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,670
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99


</TABLE>