alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 58969.

protests 148193-K, etc. (New York).

#### Antoine Chiris Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2


CSS Industries, Inc.
(the “Company”)


Summary of Commission Arrangement with Carey Edwards
On August 1, 2016, the Human Resources Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved a sales commission arrangement under which sales commissions may be paid to the Company’s Executive Vice President of Sales, Carey Edwards, based on net sales generated from the sale and shipment of certain goods to certain customers during the period beginning August 1, 2016 and ending March 31, 2017 (the “program period”).  The commission rates vary depending on the level of eligible net sales achieved during the program period and fall within a range of 2 to 3% of eligible net sales.  Any commissions earned under this arrangement are subject to approval by the Human Resources Committee, and the amount so approved will be paid in June 2017.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 42542

STATE OF IDAHO ,

Plaintiff

- Respondent ,

v.

PATRICK M. TWEEDIE ,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 415

Filed: March 4, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED OPINION AND SHALL NOT BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho,
Teton County. Hon. Gregory W. Moeller , District Judge.

Order granting, in part, Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed

.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________
Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Patrick M. Tweedie pled guilty to rape , Idaho Code § 18

- 6101(2) . The district court

imposed a unified sentence of sixteen years, with four years determinate

. Tweedie filed an Idaho

Criminal Rule 35 motion for reduction of sentence, which the district court granted in part,
reducing Tweedie’s sentence to a unified fourteen years, with three years determinate

. Tweedie

appeals , contending the district court abused its discretion by declining to further reduce his

sentence

. A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency,

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton , 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d2

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee , 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the

motion. State v. Huffman , 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the

record, including any new information submitted with Tweedie ’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude

no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order g ranting, in part,

Tweedie ’s Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN EPPS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1047 MCE KJM P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no

absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d

453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at

any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing

§ 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be

served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. 

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01047-MCE -KJM Document 31 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s February 10, 2006

motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a

later stage of the proceedings.

DATED: April 25, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1/mp

epps1047.110

Case 2:04-cv-01047-MCE -KJM Document 31 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc. (the
“Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kevin
Kelly, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date: May
13, 2010





/s/ Kevin
      KellyKevin
      KellyChief
      Executive Officer




---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID SOTO,

Petitioner,

v.

EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Respondents.

CIV S-04-1432 LKK DAD P

ORDER

Respondents have requested a thirty (30) day extension of time in which to file an answer to

the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Respondents

are granted an extension of time to and including December 19, 2005, in which to file an answer to the

petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner.

DATED: November 16, 2005.

DAD:4

soto1432.eot

Case 2:04-cv-01432-LKK -DAD Document 28 Filed 11/17/05 Page 1 of 1
EX-4.1






Exhibit 4.1




[English Translation from the Hebrew Original]




Protocol from a Meeting of the Board of Directors Held on March 11, 2007




A quorum was present and participating.



[other items intentionally deleted]



Increase the Option Plan with an Additional 500,000 Options




     Doron Birger stated that very few options remain to be granted under the 2003 option plan and
recommended increasing the plan by an additional 500,000 options to one million.


RESOLVED: to increase the number of options under the plan by an additional 500,000 to one million
options.
No. 55242.

#### Orbis Products Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 148198-K, etc. (New York)

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Exhibit
23, Form 10-K
 Kansas
City Life Insurance Company
 
 
  Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  The Board
of Directors
  Kansas
City Life Insurance Company:
  
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
(No. 333-89984, No. 333-52290, and No. 333-98805) on Form N-4 of Kansas
City Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries (the Company) of our report dated
February 26, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the
Company as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and all related financial
statement schedules, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2009, which report appears in the December 31,
2009 annual report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Life Insurance
Company.
 
 Our
report dated February 26, 2010, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company changed its method of accounting for other-than-temporary
impairments of debt securities due to the adoption of new accounting
requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB),
effective January 1, 2009, the Company changed its method of recognizing and
measuring the tax effects related to uncertain tax positions due to the adoption
of new accounting requirements issued by the FASB, effective January 1, 2007,
and the Company changed its method of deferred acquisition costs on internal
replacements of insurance contracts due to the adoption of new accounting
requirements issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants,
effective January 1, 2007.
  /s/KPMG
LLP
 KPMG
LLP
  Kansas
City, Missouri
  February
26, 2010
No. 49623.

#### Protest 955323-G of Kraft Associated Distributors (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel an allowance of 2)4 percent was made on certain Edam and Gouda cheese similar to that passed upon in Abstracts 42146 and 42309. An allowance was also made for the weight *261of the paper or foil, or both, in which certain Roquefort cheese, stipulated to be similar to that passed upon in Abstracts 36724 and 38185, was wrapped.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 19

- 20610 Conference Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Trayvees Duncan**

**- Bush,** 

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 7

- 5

Before **Graves, Willett,** and **Duncan,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Trayvees Duncan

- Bush has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Duncan

- Bush has not filed a response. We have reviewed

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 11, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-20610 Document: 00515897276 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/11/2021No. 19

- 20610

2 counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 19-20610 Document: 00515897276 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/11/2021
*No.*65499.

#### Sears, Roebuck and *Co. v.*United States,

protests 59/10579, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY MARSHALL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1694 LKK PAN P

vs.

SHERIFF GARY R. STANTON,

et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On April 13, 2006, defendant filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 

Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file

written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any

opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” On April 12, 2005, plaintiff was advised of the

requirements for filing an opposition to the motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may

be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. 

Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be

grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the

inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed April 12, 2005, plaintiff was advised that failure

to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be dismissed.

Case 2:04-cv-01694-LKK -EFB Document 92 Filed 06/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the

date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any he has, to the motion to dismiss or a

statement of non-opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

DATED: June 13, 2006.

12

mars1694.46osc

Case 2:04-cv-01694-LKK -EFB Document 92 Filed 06/14/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 11 (a)**
**IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES**
**EXHIBIT 11(a) — COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE**             **Year Ended December 31,** **2003** **2002** **2001**Average number of shares outstanding  27,915   26,829   21,175              Net income before cumulative effect of change inaccounting principle $72,817  $52,833  $45,341              Basic earnings per share before cumulative effectof change in accounting principle $2.61  $1.97  $2.14              Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  —  $495  $175              Net income $72,817  $53,328  $45,516              Basic earnings per share $2.61  $1.99  $2.15              Diluted shares outstanding            Average number of shares outstanding  27,915   26,829   21,175 Assumed conversion of preferred shares (Note 1)  2,610   2,610   2,610 Assumed conversion of convertible trustpreferred shares (Note 1)  —   72   96 Assumed exercise of stock options (Note 2)  325   164   292              Total shares  30,850   29,675   24,173              Net income $72,817  $52,833  $45,341 Add back interest on convertible shares (Note 1)  2,715   2,801   2,801              Net income before cumulative effect of change inaccounting principle $75,532  $55,634  $48,142              Diluted earnings per share before cumulativeeffect of change in accounting principle $2.45  $1.87  $1.99              Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle  —   495   175              Net income $75,532  $56,129  $48,317              Diluted earnings per share $2.45  $1.89  $2.00              
(1) The dilutive effect of convertible shares is based on the if converted method. (2) The dilutive effect of stock options is based on the Treasury Stock method.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration 

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given of a correction of a Notice of Meeting for the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment (CSAT) National Advisory Council to be held February 28 and March 1, 2007. 

                    Public notice was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 8, 2007, Volume 72, Number 26, page 5988 that the CSAT National Advisory Council would meet on February 28 and March 1 at 1 Choke Cherry Road, Sugar Loaf and Seneca Conferences, Rockville, Maryland. The meeting site and meeting dates have changed to: Washington, DC North/Gaithersburg Hilton, 620 Perry Parkway, Gaithersburg, Maryland, March 21, 9 a.m.-4 p.m., and March 22, 9 a.m.-1 p.m. The agenda has also changed to reflect the March Meeting. The contact for additional information remains as announced.                 

Dated: February 21, 2007. 

Toian Vaughn, 

Committee Management Officer, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

[FR Doc. E7-3453 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
No. 47860.

#### Protests 836392-G, etc., of International Harvest Hat Co. et al. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the hats in question consist of chip hats, the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 41666. In accordance therewith the claim at *12}i*percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and the said T. D. 48075 was sustained.
Exhibit 23

                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference:


      (i)   in  Registration  Statement  No.  33-54491  on  Form  S-8
pertaining  to  the  James River Corporation  of  Virginia  StockPlus
Investment Plan;

      (ii)   in  Registration  Statement No.  33-57153  on  Form  S-8
pertaining  to  the  James  River Corporation  of  Virginia  Canadian
Employees Stock Purchase Plan;

      (iii)   in  Registration Statement No.  33-43894  on  Form  S-8
pertaining  to the James River Corporation of Virginia  Stock  Option
Plan for Outside Directors;

       (iv)   in  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  1  to  Registration
Statement   No.  2-83979  on  Form  S-8,  serving  as  Post-Effective
Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement No. 2-64057, and  as  Post-
Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 2-76900, each
pertaining  to the James River Corporation of Virginia  Stock  Option
Plan;
      (v)   in  Registration  Statement  No.  33-56657  on  Form  S-8
pertaining  to  the  James River Corporation of Virginia  1987  Stock
Option Plan;

     (vi)  in Registration Statement No. 33-53413 on Form S-3
pertaining to the shelf registration of $600,000,000 of debt securities 
of James River Corporation of Virginia;

      (vii)   in  Registration Statement No. 333-02217  on  Form  S-8
pertaining  to  the  James River Corporation of Virginia  1996  Stock
Incentive Plan; and

      (viii)   in  Registration Statement No. 333-02213 on  Form  S-8
pertaining to the James River Corporation of Virginia Director  Stock
Ownership Plan

of  our  report, dated January 23, 1997, except as to the information
presented in Note 17, for which the date is February 21, 1997, on our
audits  of  the  consolidated financial  statements  of  James  River
Corporation of Virginia and Subsidiaries as of December 29, 1996  and
December  31,  1995, and for each of the three fiscal  years  in  the
period  ended  December  29, 1996, which report  is  incorporated  by
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                   COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Richmond, Virginia
March 26, 1997


                                 E-6
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0028. JABBAR MUHAMMAD ALI WILLIAMS v. THE STATE.

Jabbar Muhammad AliWilliams pleaded guilty to possession ofmarijuanawith

intent to distribute. Four days later, he later filed a motion to withdraw his guilty

plea, which the trial court denied. Williams then filed a “Request for Certificate of

Probable Cause” in the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court docketed the filing as an

application for discretionary appeal of the trial court’s order denying Williams’s

motion to withdraw his guilty plea and transferred the case here. 

An order denying a motion to withdraw a guilty plea may be appealed directly.

See Smith v. State, 283 Ga. 376 (659 SE2d 380) (2008). We will grant a timely filed

application for discretionary appeal if the lower court’s order is subject to direct

appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (j). Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED,

and Williams shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal

in the trial court. If he has already filed a timely notice of appeal in the trial court, he

need not file a second notice. The clerk of the superior court is directed to include a

copy of this order in the appeal record transmitted to this Court.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 22, 2018

08/22/2018
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4000 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Exhibit 31.1

Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, My E. Chung, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Luna Innovations Incorporated; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: August 10, 2012



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/    My E. Chung                               
|My E. Chung President and Chief Executive Officer