alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1





          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Curtis J. Clawson, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
the best of my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Curtis J. Clawson
-------------------------------
Curtis J. Clawson
Chairman of the Board,
President and Chief Executive Officer
December 10, 2003





                                       55
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-64,722-04

EX PARTE CHARLES JOSHUA RAINES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 11768-C IN THE 21ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM BURLESON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault

and was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision. His guilt was adjudicated a few

years later, and he was sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant gave a pro se notice of appeal immediately upon the entry of the judgment

adjudicating his guilt. The appellate court attempted to inform appointed appellate counsel that

Applicant’s general notice of appeal did not invoke the court’s jurisdiction under Texas Rule of

Appellate Procedure 25.2 and ordered appellate counsel to submit a letter identifying the issues to
2

be raised on appeal and explaining how the court had jurisdiction over those issues. Appellate

counsel did not respond, and the appellate court determined that the record did not demonstrate an

issue relating to the trial court’s jurisdiction. As such, the appellate court dismissed the appeal for

want of jurisdiction.

Applicant contends, among other things, that he was denied his right to appellate counsel and

therefore his right to an appeal. Applicant attaches a letter that he recently received from appellate

counsel in support of his claim. In it, appellate counsel states that he never received notice of his

appointment to Applicant’s case and that the relevant appellate documents do not contain his correct

address. Based on the record, we find that Applicant was denied the right to appeal through no fault

of his own but because of a breakdown in the system.

Relief is granted. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Applicant may

file an out-of-time appeal of his conviction in cause number 11768 from the 21st District Court of

Burleson County. Within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate, the trial court shall

determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by

counsel, the trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him on direct appeal. Should Applicant

decide to appeal, he must file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within thirty days from the

date of this Court’s mandate. Applicant’s remaining claims attacking the merits of the conviction

are dismissed. Ex Parte Torres, 943 S.W.2d 469 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles. 

Delivered: November 1, 2023

Do not publish
The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of 1

Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Arthur J.

Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-2461

___________

Jerry Boitnott, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Craig E. Cascarano; Fred Grittner, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: November 4, 1998

 Filed: December 4, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Minnesota inmate Jerry Boitnott appeals the district court’s order dismissing

1

under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A his civil rights action. Having carefully reviewed the record,

we affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in its order. See

8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case No. 8,433.

#### LLOYD v. LUND.

[Cited in Addison v. Duckett. Caso No. 77. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM A. ROMERO, No. CIV S-04-0459-MCE-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

D. RUNNELS,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court are petitioner’s response

to the court’s December 7, 2005, order to show cause (Doc. 27) and petitioner’s motion for leave

to file an amended petition (Doc. 29). 

On December 7, 2005, the court denied petitioner’s motion for an order staying

these proceedings and holding considering of petitioner’s claims in abeyance pending exhaustion

in state court of unexhausted claims (“stay and abeyance order”). The court concluded that a

stay and abeyance was not appropriate because this is not a “mixed” petition scenario where

petitioner has presented numerous claims in the same habeas corpus petition, but some of those

claims are unexhausted. Rather, petitioner sought a stay in order to exhaust completely new

Case 2:04-cv-00459-MCE-CMK Document 31 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

claims which were not included in the instant petition. The court noted that a stay and abeyance

order might be appropriate should petitioner be granted leave to amend the instant petition to

include the unexhausted claims. Petitioner has now sought leave to amend. Respondent will be

directed to respond.

The court’s December 7, 2005, order also addressed petitioner’s failure to comply

with various court orders in this case. In particular, the court noted several instances where

petitioner had not served documents on respondent and directed petitioner to show cause. 

Because it now appears that petitioner has served all relevant documents and understands the

service requirements, the order to show cause will be discharged. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court’s December 7, 2005, order to show cause is discharged; and

2. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, respondent shall file a

response to petitioner’s motion for leave to file an amended petition.

DATED: March 21, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00459-MCE-CMK Document 31 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ID-400-1210-MD-241A] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of public meeting.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Coeur d'Alene District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below. 

# DATES:

April 3, 2007. The meeting will start at 10 a.m. and end no later than 4 p.m. The public comment period will be from 1 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. The meeting will be held at the Idaho Commerce and Labor Career Center office located at 1350 Troy Road in Moscow, Idaho. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Stephanie Snook, RAC Coordinator, BLM Coeur d'Alene District, 3815 Schreiber Way, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83815 or telephone (208) 769-5004. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The 15-member Council advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in Idaho. The agenda will include the following topics: Election of Officers, recreation site planning and fee proposal process and recreation subcommittees. Additional topics may be added and will be included in local media announcements. More information is available at                     *http://www.blm.gov/​rac/​id/​id_​index.htm*.                 

All meetings are open to the public. The public may present written comments to the Council in advance of or at the meeting. Each formal Council meeting will also have time allocated for receiving public comments. Depending on the number of persons wishing to comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may be limited. Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact the BLM as provided above. 

Dated: February 23, 2007. 

Stephanie Snook, 

Acting District Manager.

[FR Doc. E7-3562 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Foresthealth highlights in Oregon**
 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005| 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012| 2013 | 2014| 2015 | 2016
 
SuDoc Number:A 13.154/38:
Item Number:0015-A-47 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000556886
 
August 27, 2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-41119

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NICOLAS ALMANZA ROSAS, also known as Nicolas Almanza,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:13-CR-606-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Nicolas Almanza 

Rosas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Almanza Rosas has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 8, 2014

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-41119 Document: 00512690454 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/08/2014
No. 13-41119

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 13-41119 Document: 00512690454 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/08/2014
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1)
            The report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and





2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated:
      August 10, 2009
                  By:
                  /s/
      Zuosheng YuZuosheng
      Yu(Chief
      Executive
Officer)
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or                15 (d) of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Partnership. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|        | By:    | /s/                Nancy J. Mc Gurk    |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Nancy                J. McGurk         |
|   | Title: | Chief                Financial Officer |
|   | Date:  | August                15, 2005         |

----
February 26, 1945

No. 50044.

Suit 4476.

#### St. *Andrews Textile Co., Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 830 affirmed December 11, 1944. C. A. D. 294.
Before the First Division,

June 24, 1940

No. 44004.

#### Protests 954084-G, etc., of M. Pressner *&*Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

There was testimony that the articles in question are used entirely by adults as noisemakers and as party favors. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 was therefore sustained.
No. 52971.

#### Acadia Manufactures Supply Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 71063-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling) as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3461]

[[Page 9029]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,692]

Anaheim Manufacturing Company, a Subsidiary of Western 
Industries, Including On-Site Leased Workers From Selectemp; Anaheim, 
CA; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for Worker 
Adjustment Assistance and Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 
2273), and Section 246 of the Trade Act of 1974 (26 U.S.C. 2813), as 
amended, the Department of Labor issued a Certification Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 
Trade Adjustment Assistance on January 12, 2007, applicable to workers 
of Anaheim Manufacturing Company, a subsidiary of Western Industries, 
Anaheim, California, including on-site leased workers from Selectemp. 
The notice was published in the Federal Register on January 25, 2007 
(72 FR 3424).
    At the request of the State agency, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers are engaged 
in the production of food waste disposers. Review of the certification 
shows that there was a typographical error in the heading of the 
document which indicated that the workers are certified eligible to 
apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance (ATAA). The heading 
should have read, ``Certification Regarding Eligibility to Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance and Negative Determination Regarding 
Eligibility to Apply for Alternative Trade Adjustment Assistance.'' The 
Department concluded in its initial ATAA investigation that workers of 
the subject firm possess skills that are easily transferable to other 
positions in the local area. Therefore, the worker group cannot be 
certified eligible to apply for ATAA. Accordingly, the certification is 
being amended to correct this error.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-60,692 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Anaheim Manufacturing Company, a subsidiary of 
Western Industries, Anaheim, California, including on-site leased 
workers from Selectemp, who became totally or partially separated 
from employment on or after September 25, 2006 through two years 
from the date of certification, are eligible to apply for adjustment 
assistance under Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974.

    I further determine that all workers of Anaheim Manufacturing 
Company, a subsidiary of Western Industries, Anaheim, California, 
including on-site leased workers from Selectemp, are denied eligibility 
to apply for alternative trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 
of the Trade Act of 1974.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 20th day of February 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-3461 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
```
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1   PATIENT PORTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.


     Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



I, Kevin Kelly, President, and Director "principal executive officer") of
Patient Portal Technologies, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certify that to the best
of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A 1
for the period ended June 30, 2008 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a)[15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.



Dated: November 10, 2008             /s/ KEVIN KELLY
                                     ----------------------
                                     Kevin Kelly
                                     President and Director


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
**AMENDMENT      NO. 3 TO CONSENT TO SUPPLEMENTAL LOAN**

**UNDER      LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT**

**1.**
**Defined      Terms**

**2.**
**Amendments      to Consent**

**3.**
**Increase      in the Availability Block under Loan Agreement**

**4.**
**Amendment      to Waterfall under Loan Agreement**

**5.**
**Amendment      Fee**

**6.**
**Representations,      Warranties and Covenants**

**.  **

**7.**
**Conditions      Precedent**

**.  **

**8.**
**No      Other Changes**

**.**

**9.**
**Successors      and Assigns**

**.**

**10.**
**Counterparts**

**.      **

**11.**
**Required      Lender Authorization**

**[SIGNATURE      PAGE FOLLOWS]**

|   | Read                and Agreed to: |
|--------|------------------------------------|

|   | **JACO                ELECTRONICS, INC.** |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|

|   | **INTERFACE                ELECTRONICS CORP.** |
|--------|------------------------------------------------|

|   | **BANK                OF AMERICA, N.A.,** as a                Lender |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

**THE      CIT GROUP/BUSINESS CREDIT, INC.**
Exhibit 10.10

THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Third Amendment") is made as of the 28th day of February, 2004, by and between International
Multifoods Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation") and Gary E. Costley, a resident of Wayzata, Minnesota (the "Executive").

WHEREAS,
the Corporation and Executive entered into an Employment Agreement, dated as of November 1, 1996, and amended such agreement by First Amendment to Employment Agreement,
dated as of December 19, 1997, and Second Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 13, 2001 (collectively, the "Employment Agreement"); and

WHEREAS,
the Board of Directors of the Corporation elected the Executive to the additional offices of President of the Corporation effective as of February 28, 2004, because of
the relinquishment by Dan C. Swander of the office of President of the Corporation effective as of February 28, 2004 under and pursuant to the terms of a Leave of Absence Agreement, dated
December 23, 2003, between the Corporation and Dan C. Swander.

NOW,
THEREFORE, effective as February 28, 2004, the Employment Agreement is amended as follows:



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation and the Executive have caused this Third Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date and year first above written.

| |  | International Multifoods Corporation
| |  | ------------------------------------
| |  | By:                                 
| |  | Its:                                
| |  | /s/GARY E. COSTLEYGary E. Costley   

---



QuickLinks