alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 

The Honorable Alvin Brown 

Mayor of Jacksonville 

Jacksonville, FL 32202 

Dear Mayor Brown: 

January 9, 2013 

i'" ....• ,J' 

Thank you for your letter supporting the application of JetBiue Airways for two within-perimeter 

slot exemptions at Ronald Reagan Washi11gton National Airport (DCA). JetBlue proposes to 

serve Jacksonville International Airport with one nonstop round trip per day from DCA. 

We received JetBiue's application on December 5, 2012. Other timely applications w~re 

received from Southwest Airlines, proposing one nonstop round trip to Houston~s William P. 

Hobby Airport, and from US Airways, proposing one nonstop round trip to Will Rogers World 

Airport in Oklahoma City. 

As the matter is still pending. I cannot comment on the merits of the points raised in your letter. 

However, I can assure you that all applications received by the U.S. Department of 

Transportation will be given due and careful consideration. 

The Department's action on this matter is being administered through a public docket, which 

a11ows all interested parties the opportunity to comment Following our normal practice, I am 

placing a copy of yoU!' letter and this response i docket number DOT-OST-20 0-7182. 

I appreciate your interest in this matter. 

Ray LaHood 
\ 

OFFICE OF MAYOR ALVIN BROWN 

ST. JAMES BUILDING PH: (904) 630-1776 

FAX: (904} 630-2J91 

www.coj.net 

IIi WEST DUVAL STREET, SUITE 400 

JACKSONVILLE. FLORIDA 32202 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. Sec~ 

December 5, 2012 

I am writing to you as the Mayor of the City of Jacksonville to express our support for the 

application of JetBlue Airways for new nonstop service between Ronald Reagan Washington 

National Airport and Jacksonville International Airport. 

With three military bases in the City, and another just to our north, the Jacksonville area has the 

third largest military presence in the country. Several other government agencies, including a 

Federal Reserve Branch, U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, a U.S. Courthouse and Federal Building, 

call Jacksonville home. Travel between Jacksonville a11d the Nation's Capital currenlly exceeds 

530 people per day. JetBiue's usual low fare stimulation in the market will provide more 

competitive pricing and assure that Northeast Florida and Southeast Georgia residents have 

choices for air service to this very important region. 

Your approval of JetBlue's service would be a m<~jor benefit for the City of Jacksonville as well 

as the rest of Northeast Florida and Southeast Georgia, where businesses and our military have 

strong links with Washington, D.C. 

Thank you for your consideration. 

Alvin Brown 

Mayor, City of Jacksonville
Case 2:04-cv-01208-GEB -KJM   Document 92    Filed 11/30/05   Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-01208-GEB -KJM   Document 92    Filed 11/30/05   Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-01208-GEB -KJM   Document 92    Filed 11/30/05   Page 3 of 3

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-27T19:25:46-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
## *Neurology*

### Paralyzed Persons, Urinary Complications

January 1999

----

**Clinical Focus***

- What combination of signs, symptoms, and laboratory findings are associated with risks for persons with paralysis due to neurogenic bladder? 
- What are risk factors for recurrent urinary tract infections (UTls)?
- What are the risks and benefits of long-term use of antibiotic prophylaxis?

*Addressed in the summary or evidence report.

----

*Prevention and Management of Urinary Tract Infections in Paralyzed Persons*Summary (Publication No. 99-E007, January 1999)Evidence Report (Publication No. 99-E008, February 1999)Selected Publications

EPC: Southern California-RANDTopic Nominators: Paralyzed Veterans of America (including 30 local chapters), American Association of Spinal Cord Injury Psychologists,American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, American Paraplegia Society, Association of Rehabilitation Nurses,Consortium of Spinal Cord Medicine

----

Return to Quick Menu: Evidence Report TopicsReturn to Evidence-based Practice
wellquest_s1a-ex1010.htm


     

     

    
      Please
see PDF "wellquest_s1a-ex1010.pdf" for Exhibit 10.10 - Financial Covenant
Compliance Waiver
(Reap. Dec. 8662)

Entry No. D. E. 5111.

#### Universal Foreign Service Co. for Harry H. Lederer & Co. *v.*United States

(Decided September 26, 1956)

*Lawrence & Tuttle {George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General *{Samuel D. Spector,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts. On such facts, I find that the 100 6-volt oilcoils here involved, which were appraised at 4.19.6 each, English currency, plus packing, net, should be properly valued at 4.19.6 each, English currency, less 33% per centum, plus packing 1.0.0 English currency.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e co urt has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 10547 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. J OE MCDONA L D D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e N ort h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 4 : 0 7
- CR- 1 7 4
- ALL
B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D E N N IS, an d P R A D O , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * Th e Feder alPu bl i c D ef enderappointed t o r epr es entJo e M c D onal d has m o ve d f o r l e av e t o w i t hdr aw a nd has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A nder s v. C a lifo r n ia , 3 86 U
. S. 7 38 ( 19 67 )
. M c D o nal d has no tf i l e d a r e s po ns e . Our i nde pe nde ntr e vi e w o f t he r e c o r d a nd c o uns e l ’ s b r i e f di s c l o s e s no no nf

r i vo l o us is s u e fo ra p p e a l. A c c o r d i n g ly , co u n s e l’ s m o tio n fo rle a v e to w ith d r a w is GRANTED, c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a nd t he A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Februar y 18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
©	Copyright	201 6

, Drone	Universities,	All	Rights	Reserved.	Revision	1 6 January	11,	2016 U.S.	Department	of	Transportation,	Docket	Operations

West	Building	Ground	Floor,	Room	w12B140

1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	S.E.

Washington,	DC	20590

Petition	for	Exemption	Under	14	CFR § 11.81.	to	Allow	Commercial

Use	of	Unmanned	Aircraft	Systems

Petitioner :

Michael	Robbins

Drone	Universities ,	LLC

4450	El	Centro	Road	#416

Sacramento,	CA	95834

(858)	216

- 4416 x	103

michael.robbbins@droneuniversities.com Prepared	By:

Sam	Estrin

Drone	Universities,	LLC

4450	El	Centro	Road	#416

Sacramento,	CA	95834

(858)	21 6

- 4416 x	102

sam.estrin@ gmail.com

To	Whom	It	May	Concern,

Re:	Section	333	Exemption	No.	13350,	Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 3209

- Update	to	Exemption	Request	Section	333	of	the	FAA	Reform	Act	and	Part	11	of	the

Federal	Aviation	Regulations	from	14 C.F.R.	45.23(b);14	CFR	Part	21;14	CFR	61.113

(a)	&	(b);	91.7	(a);91.9	(b)	(2);91.103(b);	91.109;91.119;	91.121;

91.151(a);91.203(a)	&	(b);91.405	(a);	91.407(a)	(1);	91.409	(a)	(2);91.417	(a)	&

(b).

This	is	a	request	to	amend Section	333	Exemption	No.	13 350,	Regulatory Docket No.

FAA

- 2015

- 3209

, which	provides Drone	Universities,	LLC with	an	exemption	that

allows	for	limited	commercial	use	of	UAVs

.

In	addition	to	the	UAVs	covered	in	the	original	exemption	request,	we	respectfully

request	permission	to	fl y	the	following	six	(6)	UAVs:

• DJI	Phantom	2	(All	Models)

• DJI	Phantom	3	(All	Models)

• DJI	Inspire	1

• DJI	Inspire	X5

• DJI	S900	(All	Models)

• DJI	S1000	(All	Models)

Please	advise	us	of	any	additional	information	or	changes	that	may	be	required.©	Copyright	201 6

, Drone	Universities,	All	Rights	Reserved.	Revision	1 6 January	11,	2016 Sincerely,

Michael	Robbins,

Director	of	Training,	Drones

Drone	University

0 1 / 11 /20 16
Before the Second Division,

April. 26, 1960

No. 64122.

protest 58/12586 (New York).

#### Lucas Electrical Service, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ammeters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lucas Electrical Services, Inc.,*and *Frank J. Eberle Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 209, C.D. 1776), except that the ammeters in the cited case were parts of automobiles whereas those in question are parts of motorcycles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9607]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3710]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration  10817]

Oregon Disaster  OR-00017

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major 
disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Oregon (FEMA-1683-
DR), dated 02/22/2007.
    Incident: Severe Winter Storm and Flooding.
    Incident Period: 12/14/2006 through 12/15/2006.
    Effective Date: 02/22/2007.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/23/2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street, SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the President's major disaster declaration on 02/22/2007, Private Non-
Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental 
nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above 
or other locally announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Benton, Clatsop Columbia, Lincoln, Polk, Tillamook, 
Wheeler, Yamhill, Confederated Tribes Of The Siletz Indians

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit             5.250
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Businesses And Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit             4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 10817.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Herbert L. Mitchell,
Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.
 [FR Doc. E7-3710 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
```
#### In re Eugene P. GOLDBERG and James W. Burns.

No. 01-1162.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 2, 2001.

ORDER

The appellant having failed to file the brief required by Federal Circuit Rule *95531(a) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the notice of appeal be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           Dec-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                             PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>               2,343,494
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>               231,874
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                    160,980
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                  178,164
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,914,512
<COMMON>                                  449,697
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                  (1,666)
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                       455,934
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>            910,449
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          62
<PREFERRED>                                89,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                      944,136
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                       0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>              26,591
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                       0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                     0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>            944,274
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>           2,914,512
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                 903,919
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                       68,155
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                657,951
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                726,106
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                   177,813
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                        (11,559)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>            166,254
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                   58,083
<NET-INCOME>                              108,171
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                 3,790
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>             104,381
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                   98,421
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                  53,939
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                    216,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                1.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                1.69


</TABLE>
55 MPH 65 MPH

Engine Torque 347.4 Nm Engine Torque Engine Speed 1401 RPM Engine Speed FE 14.26 MPG FE Fuel Rate 3.366g/s Fuel Rate BSFC 237.7494g/(kW-hr) BSFCEngine Torque 434.8 Nm Engine Speed 1655 RPM 11.73 MPG 4.835 g/s 230.9842 g/(kW-hr)
(Reap. Dec. 10720)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United States

Entry No. 1663, etc.

(Decided April 15, 1964)

*Stem & Shostah*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the parties herein:

> XT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the merchandise marked “V” and initialed LP BCA by F. L. Pierce B. C. Arnald on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, which is incorporated herein, that, on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the market values or the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the ex factory invoiced unit values, net packed.

> 2. That all of the merchandise covered by all of the appeals for reappraisement the subject of this stipulation was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

> 3. That as to any of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases which is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, 93 Oust. Ot. 14, issued January 20, 1958, as provided for in See. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> 4. That the footwear covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases is unlike any articles manufactured or produced in the United States.

> 5. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

*515On tbe agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that •valué is defined in section 402a(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the'merchandise herein involved and that such values were the ex-factory invoiced unit values, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





Pursuant  to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the  undersigned officer of Genesis  HealthCare Corporation (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to  the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) that:





| | (1) | The Report    fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and                      
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                              
| | (2) | The    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the    Company.




|Date:    February 8, 2006 | /s/ George    V. Hager, Jr.
|------------------------- | ---------------------------
|                          |                            
|                          | George V.    Hager, Jr.    
|                          | Chief    Executive Officer 




The  foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 1350 of  Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code and is not being filed as part  of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.





---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES P. DeFAZIO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1358 WBS GGH

vs.

HOLLISTER, INC., et al., ORDER

Defendants. 

 /

On May 27, 2009, this court directed defendants to file a statement of compelling

reasons for requiring plaintiffs’ documents listed in support of their opposition to defendants’

motion for summary judgment (#525) to be filed under seal. On June 3, 2009, defendants filed a

statement indicating their position that it was not necessary for any of the documents listed on

docket #525 to be filed under seal, based on their review of the documents and the standards set

forth in this court’s May 11, 2009 order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: to the extent plaintiffs have not done so

already, they shall file documents in support of their opposition to defendants’ statement of

undisputed facts (#525) in the public record.

Dated: June 10, 2009

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_____________________________

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:076

DeFazio1358.conf2.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 551 Filed 06/11/09 Page 1 of 1
No. 46112.

#### Protests 21253-K, etc., of J. Hofert et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 61338.

protest 286786-K (New York).

#### Lang & Marshall Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion 'by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vises the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 59420, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gail P. Seneca, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Luminent MortgageCapital, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004   By: /s/ GAIL P. SENECA  Gail P. Seneca Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)