alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.2
                           ============

        Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
----------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10QSB of Bliss
Essentials Corp. (Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Gelfand,
Chief Executive Officer of Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:

   (1)  the registration statement fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
        1934; and

   (2)  the information contained in the registration statement fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of Registrant.


Date: November 12, 2003        /s/ Thomas Gelfand
                              ----------------------------------
                              Chief Executive Officer of
                              Bliss Essentials Corp., Registrant













                                15
<PAGE>
-79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/19 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 21(a).  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                            STATE OR OTHER
                                                            JURISDICTION OF
                                                             INCORPORATION
NAME                                                        OR ORGANIZATION
----                                                        ---------------

Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company                            Indiana
         Irwin Union Collateral, Inc.                         Indiana
         Irwin Union Realty Corporation                       Indiana
         Irwin Union Insurance, Inc.                          Indiana
         Irwin Union Securities, Inc.                         Indiana
         Irwin Funding Corp.                                  Delaware
         Irwin Funding Corp. II                               Delaware
         Irwin Union Advisory Services, Inc.                  Indiana
         Irwin Reinsurance Corporation                        Vermont
         Irwin International Corporation                      Edge Act
               Onset Capital Corporation                      Canada

IFC Mortgage Corporation                                      Indiana
         Irwin Mortgage Corporation                           Indiana

Irwin Union Investor Services, Inc.                           Indiana

Irwin Home Equity Corporation                                 Indiana
         IHE Funding Corp.                                    Delaware

Irwin Equipment Finance Corp.                                 Indiana
         Irwin Leasing Corporation                            Illinois

Irwin Union Bank, F.S.B.                                      Federal

Irwin Union Credit Insurance Corporation                      Arizona

IFC Capital Trust I                                           Delaware

IFC Capital Trust II                                          Delaware

IFC Capital Trust III                                         Delaware

Irwin Business Finance Corporation                            Indiana

Irwin Ventures LLC                                            Delaware
         Irwin Ventures SBIC LLC                              Delaware
CC_____MARYLANDDEPARTMENTOFTHEENVIRONMENT1800WashingtonBoulevard•BaltimoreMD21230IVIDE410-537-3000•1-800-633-6101MartinO’MalleyShariT.WilsonGovernorSecretaryAnthonyG.BrownRobertM.Summers,Ph.D.LieutenantGovernorDeputySecretaryJanuary27,2010Mr.ShawnM.Garvin,RegionalAdministratorU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyRegion111-MiddleAtlanticRegion(3RAOO)1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,PA19103-2029DearMr.Garvin:TheMarylandDepartmentoftheEnvironment’s2009Ozoneambientconcentrationdata,alongwiththequalityassurancedataiscompletelysubmittedtotheNationalAirQualitydatabase,AQS.ThedatawasreviewedandcertifiedascorrecttothebestoftheirknowledgetakingintoconsiderationthequalityassurancefindingsbytheAmbientAirMonitoringProgram,AirandRadiationManagementAdministration.TheAMP45Oreportisincludedwiththisletter.The2009OzonesitesarelistedintheAMP45O(reportID:710026).TheAMP255(reportID:710307)isalsoincludedwiththisletter.Thisreportcontainstheprecisionandaccuracysummariesforthe2009Ozonedata.AstheseniorairpollutionofficialfortheStateofMaryland,IagreewiththeAmbientAirMonitoringProgram’sassessmentofthe2009Ozonedata.IrequestthatthedatabeincludedasearlycertifiedofficialdataforMarylandintheNationalAirQualitydatabase.MDEissubmittingthisdataforearlycertificationsothatitcanbereviewedbyEPAfortheBaltimoreMetroandCecilCounty8-hourOzone1-yearattainmentdateextensionprocess.OnceRegion3’sreviewofthecertificationpackageiscompletepleaseforwardittoMr.DavidLutz,DataCertificationContact,USEPA(D243-02),U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,ResearchTrianglePark,NC27711forinsertionintotheAQSdatabaseascertified2009MarylandOzonedata.Sincy,*Geoe(Tad)Aburn,DirectorAirandRadiationManagementAdministrationTAD/EGcc:WalterWilkie,EPA,RegionIIIEdwinGluthRecycledPaperwww.mde.state.md.usTTYUsers1-800-735-2258ViaMarylandRelayService
EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #122003 Limited Partnership (the
Partnership) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) 
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) 
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | By: | /s/Freddie M. Kotek
| | --- | -------------------

| | Name: | Freddie M. Kotek
| | ----- | ----------------

| | Title: | Chief Executive
              Officer of the Managing General Partner
| | ------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------

| | Date: | August 16,2004
| | ----- | --------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS A. HIGHTOWER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0887 GEB GGH P

vs.

ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 17, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order

and a request to stay the scheduling order. Plaintiff alleges that on March 25, 2006, he was

placed in administrative segregation (ad seg) after being accused of threatening a correctional

officer. Plaintiff alleges that he does not have access to his legal property.

Local Rule 72-302 of the Eastern District of California permits magistrate judges

to handle all aspects of a prisoner’s case short of jury trial. It has also been interpreted as

authorizing magistrate judges to issue orders under § 636(b)(1)(A) for non-dispositive motions or

motions not involving injunctive relief. See also United States v. Raddatz, 447 U.S. 667, 673,

100 S. Ct. 2406, 2411 (1980) (magistrate judge may hear any pretrial matter except “dispositive”

motions).

Case 2:04-cv-00887-GEB-GGH Document 47 Filed 05/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 Therefore, the fact that parties are directed in their activities by a magistrate judge

cannot, without more, transform the matter at hand into an “injunctive” relief matter governed by 

§ 636(b)(1)(B). See, e.g., Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, 951 F.2d 236 (9th Cir.

1991) (magistrate judge may compel a party to pay prospective sanctions of $500.00 per day

during period of non-compliance with discovery orders to ensure compliance). It is only when

the “injunctive” relief sought goes to the merits of plaintiff’s actions or to complete stays of an

action that orders under § 636(b)(1)(A) are precluded. See, e.g., Reynaga v. Cammisa, 971 F.2d

414 (9th Cir. 1992).

In the instant case, plaintiff’s request does not go to the merits of plaintiff’s

action. Accordingly, this matter may be handled by court order.

Plaintiff is directed to inform the court whether he has been granted access to his

legal property regarding this action since the filing of his motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s April 17, 2006, motion for injunctive relief is construed as a motion

for a protective order;

2. Plaintiff shall inform the court within twenty days of the date of this order

regarding whether he has access to his legal property regarding this action. 

DATED: 5/10/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

high887.ord

Case 2:04-cv-00887-GEB-GGH Document 47 Filed 05/11/06 Page 2 of 2
March 31, 1953

Hon. William H. Scott Opi.nion No. S-22 Crimina~l

District Attorney Civil CourtsBullding Re: Applicabil~ity of the motor Houston 2, Texas vehl~cle transfer tax to the submIttedtransact!onbetween Johnston Oil,Field Service Corporation and Johnston Testers, Inc. Attention: Hon. James R. Gough

Assistent~

District Attorney Deer Sir:

You request the~opinion of this office es to whether-e certain transfer of motor vehicles between the,Johnston Oil Field Service Corporationend Johnston Testers, Inc. Is subject to the tex levied by Article 7047k, Civil Statutes,

The facts seem to be es follows: All of the capital stock of Johnston Oil Field S,ervice CorporatLon, e Texas corporation, was acquired by the Johnston Testers, Inc., e Delewere corporetion,with a permit to do business in the State of Texas. This being accomplished the Johnston Oil Field Service Corporetionwes liquidatedby transfer of ~11 the assets of the Johnston 011 Field Service Corporation, includingthe motor'vehlcles owned end registeredby the Johnston Oil Field Service'Corporetlon. There wes in fact a merger of the Johnston~OilField ServLce Corporationwith the Johnston Testers, Inc.,without consideretion.

transectiondoes nc

We ere of the opinion thet under the conceded facts this

)tconstitute a taxable sale of the motor .C.S'.There is vehiclesunder the provisions of Article 7047k,V no case in this ?,tateor I,n any other jurisdictionwhich our re- '. search has revealed exactly inpoint. In the cese of Jones, Collector of InternalRevenue v. Noble Drill!ng Comoang Incorporated, 135 Fed. 2d 721, involvi~ng facts somewhat simiier, the court said:

"Themerger agreementwas without ConsideratSon. There.wes e statutorymerger, not a mere sale of assets." It appears that if there be a merger of two corporations, either by contract or by operation of law,wlthout considerationHon. WIllfern H. Scott, page 2 s-22

moving to the liquidated corporation, it does not have the effect of converting the transfer of the essets of the liquidated corporation to the surviving corporation Intoa sale of the assets.

We do not think the facts here are enalegous to the factsupon which our previous OpinionNo. v-36 (1947) isbased. A transfer of the motor vehiclesby the pertnership to the corporation in OpinionNo. v-36 wes concededlybased upon the value of the motor VehiCleB transferred, henceupon a 'substantleland ascertainable consideration. Such 1,s not the cese here. SUMMARY There'ls not e sele of motor vehicleswithin the.provisions of the motor vehi,cle~ sales tax imposed by Article 7047k-upon the transfer of motor vehicles from a Liquidated corporationto the surviving corporetionby e merger of the corporations when the mergerwes without consideration. Yours very truly, JOHN BEN SHEPPRRb Attorney General

APPROVED: W.V. Geppert' TaxationDivision Willis Gresham Reviewer Robert S. Trotti FLrst Assistant John Ben Shepperd Attorney General LPL:MG9c By: s/L. P. Lollar L. .P.Lollar Assistant
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.B

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2004, of El Paso Production Holding Company (the "Company") as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, D. Mark Leland, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify
(i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ D. Mark Leland
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        D. Mark Leland
                                        Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)

                                        October 28, 2004



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to El Paso Production Holding Company and will be retained by El Paso
Production Holding Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1

The X-Change Corporation
File No. 000-53132
Form 10-K
For the year ended December 31, 2011

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The X-Change Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2011 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, R. Wayne Duke,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of the  Company,
certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 4, 2012                       By: /s/ R. Wayne Duke
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            R. Wayne Duke
                                            Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Acting Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to The  X-Change  Corporation  and will be  retained  by The  X-Change
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Exhibit 24

                         POWER OF ATTORNEY

       The  undersigned   hereby constitute   and  appoint IRVING
WEISER, LOUIS  C. FORNETTI and  DANIEL J.  REUSS and each of them
his  true  and  lawful  attorneys-in-fact and  agents,  with full
powers  of  substitution and resubstitution,  for him and  in his
name, place  and  stead,  in  any and all capacities, to sign the
Annual  Report  on Form 10-K of Intera Financial Incorporated for
the  fiscal  year ending December  31, 1996  and  all  amendments
to  such    Annual Report   on Form  10-K, and  to file  the same
with all exhibits thereto,  and other  documents  in   connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,  granting
unto  said attorneys-in-fact and  agents, each acting alone, full
power and authority to do and perform to all intents and purposes
as  he might or could do  in person,  hereby  ratifying all  that
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting    alone,  or  his
substitutes, may  lawfully do  or cause  to  be  done  by  virtue
thereof.


SIGNATURE                            DATE
-------------------------            ----------------

John C. Appel                        February 4, 1997
-------------------------
John C. Appel

J. Evans Attwell                     February 4, 1997
-------------------------
J. Evans Attwell

Susan S. Boren                       February 4, 1997
-------------------------
Susan S. Boren

F. Gregory Fitz-Gerald               February 4, 1997
-------------------------
F. Gregory Fitz-Gerald

Louis C. Fornetti                    February 4, 1997
-------------------------
Louis C. Fornetti

William A. Johnstone                 February 4, 1997
-------------------------
William A. Johnstone

Daniel J. Reuss                      February 4, 1997
-------------------------
Daniel J. Reuss

C.A. Rundell, Jr.                    February 4, 1997
-------------------------
C.A. Rundell, Jr.

Robert L. Ryan                       February 4, 1997
-------------------------
Robert L. Ryan

Arthur R. Schulze, Jr.               February 4, 1997
-------------------------
Arthur R. Schulze, Jr.

Irving Weiser                        February 4, 1996
-------------------------
Irving Weiser
(Reap. Dec. 10045)

#### Akron Tire Supply Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 14399; 14865.

(Decided July 7, 1961)

*Tompkins é Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*William B. OrricJc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items on the invoices covered by the above-specified reappraisement appeals, which are marked with A, or O and the initials RMM, Examiner R. M. Maben consist of the following identified articles, which are not specified in the Final List as set forth in T.D. 54521 and which fall within the following classifications as set forth in the Tariff Act of 1930 as modified:

> Items marked Notice of articles Glassification

> A Parts of automobile trucks, other. 10%% Par. 369(c)

> C Parts of agricultural implements. Free Par. 1604

> That at the time of exportation said items marked A, or C had “export values” as defined in Section 402, Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that said “export values” were the appraised unit values as checked in red on the invoices, or attachments thereto, less 50%, less ocean freight and insurance, and plus export packing as specified on the invoices.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement on the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 296, T.D. 54165, and hold that such statutory value for this merchandise is the appraised unit values as checked in red on the invoices, or attachments thereto, less 50 per centum, less ocean freight and insurance, plus export packing, as specified on the invoices.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD BARRON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-01197 GEB GGH P

vs.

DR. USHA PAI, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On June 15, 2005, plaintiff filed a letter. That document was not served on

defendants. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted to the court for consideration

must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served electronically are

usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a document with the

court on behalf of any defendants, then documents submitted by plaintiff must be served on that

attorney and not on the defendants. Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g.,

by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the

document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See

Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c). 

Plaintiff’s June 15, 2005, letter is disregarded for his failure to serve it on

defendants’ counsel. Plaintiff is informed that he has no deadlines pending at this time.

Case 2:04-cv-01197-GEB-GGH Document 38 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 15, 2005 letter is

disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to properly serve any documents subsequently

filed in this action, and failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may

result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

DATED: 7/13/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:kf

barr1197.35 

Case 2:04-cv-01197-GEB-GGH Document 38 Filed 07/14/05 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4282 

To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from implementing any rule or 

regulation requiring the mandatory use of electronic identification eartags 

on cattle and bison. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 8, 2024 

Mr. ROUNDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To prohibit the Secretary of Agriculture from implementing 

any rule or regulation requiring the mandatory use of 

electronic identification eartags on cattle and bison. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON ELECTRONIC IDENTIFICA4 TION EARTAG MANDATES FOR CATTLE AND 

5 BISON. 

6 The Secretary of Agriculture shall not implement any 

7 rule or regulation requiring the mandatory use of elec8 tronic identification eartags on cattle or bison. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
      32.2








CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-QSB
      for the quarter ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Alan G.
      Orlowsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Z Trim Holdings, Inc. certify, pursuant Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Z Trim
      Holdings, Inc.





Dated:
      May 9, 2007


By
      /s/
      Alan G. Orlowsky





Alan
      G.
      Orlowsky


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Financial Officer)