alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      23.1.a





CONSENT
      OF COUNSEL





As
      General Counsel and Assistant Secretary of Great Plains Energy Incorporated,
      I
      have reviewed the statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions in
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and
      consent to the incorporation by reference of such statements in the Company’s
      previously-filed Form S-3 Registration Statements (Registration
      No. 333-97263, Registration No. 333-132829, Registration
      No. 333-114486 and Registration No. 333-133891) and Form S-8 Registration
      Statements (Registration No. 33-45618 and Registration
      No. 333-132828).





/s/Mark
      G. English


Mark
      G.
      English





Kansas
      City, Missouri


February
      27, 2007
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 1 of 10

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 27 Att. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-4 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 10 of 10
## Georgia DepartmentofNatural Resources Environmental Protection Division

A. Stanley Meiberg flPA-UGION H Acting Regional Administrator Atull'i.'A.G4 U.S. EPA, Region 4 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303-3104 RE: Withdrawal ofSection 11O(a)(2)(D)(i)(l) Portion ofthe Georgia's Certification of110(a) Infrastructure Elements forthe 2008 8-HourOzone NAAQs Dear Mr. Meiburg: On March 6, 2012, the Georgia Environmental Division (EPD) submitted a letterto the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certifying that Georgia's current State Implementation Plan (SIP) contains the Section 11O(a) elements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) that meet the requirements of the 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) as revised in 2008. The 11O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) is the interstate transport component, also known as the "good neighbor obligation" and requires the determination of significant contribution to nonattainment or maintenance ofdownwind States. On August 21, 2012, the decision by The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to vacate the 2011 Cross-StateAir Pollution Rule (CSAPR) (EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, No. 11-1302) clarified that only EPA can determine "significant contribution" and that "a SIP cannot be deemed to lack a required submission or be deemed deficient for failing to implement the good neighbor obligation until after EPA has defined the State's good neighbor obligation," which is reiterated in the November 19, 2012 EPA memo from Gina McCarthy, AssistantAdministrator. Atthis time, EPA has yetto determine Georgia's significant contribution ofpollutants, in regards to the 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS, to any downwind State. Therefore, no revision to Georgia's SIP is necessary atthis time to incorporate this element ofSection 11O(a) of the CAA. Once EPA determines Georgia's significant contribution to nonattainment or maintenance areas in downwind States, then EPA may require Georgia to submit a SIP revision under Section 11O(k)(5) or submit a new SIP under Section 110(a)(1) ofthe CAA. Therefore, the certification that GA EPD submitted relating to 11O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) is no longer applicable. As such, the State ofGeorgia hereby withdraws the 11O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) portion ofthe March 6, 2012 submission ofthe Certification of Infrastructure Elements forthe 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS as they pertain to Georgia.A. Stanley Meiburg Page2 of2 

# OCT!OI2013 Ifyou have any questions or need further information, please contact Keith Bentley at (404) 363-7016 orJimmyJohnston at (404) 363-7014. Sincerely,



# . IIC-_

JHT:JPJ:JLK c: Scott Davis, U.S. EPA Region 4 Keith Bentley, EPD, Air Protection Branch JimmyJohnston, EPD, Air Protection Branch
Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers 

Medical Records Request Form

LAST NAME: FIRST NAME: MI:

SSN: DATE OF BIRTH: YR. OF INJURY:

PHONE:

OFFICE: HOME: CELL:

EMAIL: COPY OF DRIVERS LICENSE ATTACHED YES

CLASS: SEX (CHECK ONE) MALE FEMALE

This is to affirm/declare that I request access to medical records maintained by the Federal Law 

Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC) which pertain to me. I understand that knowingly or willfully seeking 

or obtaining access to records about another person under false pretenses is punishable by a fine of up to

$5,000. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

I request that all my located medical records be forwarded to me at the following address: 

ADDRESS:

SIGNATURE: DATE:

PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF A VALID DRIVER’S LICENSE FOR SIGNATURE VERIFICATION.

Penalty under 5 U.S.C. 552a (i) (3)

Any person who knowingly and willfully requests or obtains any record concerning an individual from an Agency under 

false pretenses shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000. Additionally, while not specified in 

the law, the individual whose privacy is violated can seek civil damages against the person who requested the records 

under false pretenses.

PRIVACY ACT NOTICE

The authority for collection of information including Social Security Number (SSN) is derived from 5 U.S.C. Section 301, 

5 U.S.C. Section 4101 et seq., Executive Order No. 11348, and DHS Delegation Number 7050. The SSN is required to 

identify and retrieve health care records. If you furnish none of the information requested, the government will be 

unable to process your request. If you furnish only part of the information required, an attempt will be made to process 

your request. If the information withheld is found to be essential to effectively locating your records, you will be so 

informed.

This all inclusive Privacy Act Statement will apply to all requests for health care records and will become a permanent 

part of your health care record.

NOTE: Medical requests are processed on a first-come, first-served basis. The average processing time for 

Medical requests is four weeks.

(Created December 10, 2013)
**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Earle M.Jorgensen Company (“EMJ”) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,William S. Johnson, as Chief Financial Officer of EMJ, hereby certify pursuantto 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1) This Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) Information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof EMJ.

 
| Date:  June  25, 2004                             |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |
|                                                   |
| /S/ WILLIAM S. JOHNSON                                 |   |
| William S. Johnson                                     |
| Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and  Secretary |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to EMJ and will be retained by EMJ and furnished to theSecurities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 22, 2015.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D14-1298

Lower Tribunal No. 12-28532 B

________________

Justin Hulse,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Bronwyn C.

Miller, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Marti Rothenberg, Assistant Public

Defender, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jonathan Tanoos, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, LAGOA, and SALTER, JJ.

LAGOA, J.

Justin Hulse (“Hulse”) appeals the trial court’s revocation of his community

control and sentence. 
We affirm without discussion the revocation and sentence as the State

proved by a preponderance of the evidence each violation relied on by the trial

court to revoke Hulse’s community control. However, we remand the case to the

trial court for entry of a written order to conform to the trial court’s oral

pronouncement. See Owens v. State, 141 So. 3d 259 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); Brown

v. State, 127 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013); see also Thompson v. State, 965 So.

2d 1250, 1251 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“When a conflict exists between an oral

revocation pronouncement and the written order revoking probation, the oral

pronouncement will control.”).

Order and sentence affirmed; remanded with directions. 

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

STEVEN PAUL GARCIA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 14-10556

D.C. No. 1:13-cr-00141-AWIBAM-1

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Anthony W. Ishii, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 26, 2015** 

Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.

Steven Paul Garcia appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges

the 18-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for escape

from custody, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 751(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), Garcia’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no

FILED

OCT 28 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have

provided Garcia the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se

supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. 

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED. 

2
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2010-0515

Directorate Identifier: 2009NM196AD

670SH-78-029 --- 7/3/08

670SH-78-029, RB --- 11/25/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6934

NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK CONROY, Warden; THOMAS P. CORCORAN,

Former Warden; CHARLES H. SMITH, Assistant

Warden; SAMUEL HAWKINS, Security Chief; LEHRMAN DOTSON, Assistant Warden; MAURICE VICE,

C.O.I.; DAVID BARRELL; COREY BROWN; DARNELL

DUNSTON, Each above defendant is sued in their

official and individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 00-7182

NICHOLAS WARNER JONES, a/k/a Charles Jones,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK CONROY, Warden; JOHN JOSEPH CURRAN,

JR.; WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN; ANGELO LEE, Lieutenant; LARRY TROY, Captain; SHARON MARTIN,

Officer; A. SMITH, Officer,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-00-

1728-L, CA-00-645-L)

Submitted: October 12, 2000 Decided: October 20, 2000

Before WILLIAMS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicholas Warner Jones, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney

General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Nicholas Warner Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See Jones v. Conroy,No. CA-00-1728-L (D.

Md. June 28, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**ESSEX
      PORTFOLIO, L.P.**


**Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Michael T. Dance,
      hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form
      10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the “Form 10-Q”) of Essex Portfolio,
      L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and information
      contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of Essex Portfolio, L.P. at the
      dates of and for the periods presented.











Date:
      May
      9, 2007     /s/
      Michael T. Dance


Michael
      T.
      Dance


Chief
      Financial
      Officer, Executive Vice President,


Essex
      Property Trust, Inc., general partner of


Essex
      Portfolio,
      L.P.
----

----

III Informazioni

Commissione

----

UFFICIO EUROPEO PER LA LOTTA ANTIFRODE (OLAF)

Avviso di posti vacanti di

direttore «Investigazioni e operazioni II» (OLAF.B)

(AD 14 — Rif. COM/2006/10031)

e di direttore «Supporto operativo e politico» (OLAF.C)

(AD 14 — Rif. COM/2006/10032)

(2006/C 238 A/01)

Chi siamo

L’Ufficio europeo per la lotta antifrode (OLAF). La lotta contro le frodi perpetrate a danno degli interessi finanziari delle Comunità europee è un elemento centrale per la credibilità del progetto europeo. A tale lotta tutte le istituzioni dell’UE attribuiscono quindi una priorità di grado elevato. L’OLAF è al tempo stesso un servizio investigativo e la direzione generale della Commissione responsabile dell’elaborazione e dell’attuazione della politica contro le frodi.

Che cosa proponiamo

I candidati devono

I direttori saranno selezionati e nominati dalla Commissione secondo le sue procedure di selezione e di assunzione. La retribuzione e le condizioni di lavoro sono quelle indicate per il grado AD 14 nello statuto dei funzionari delle Comunità europee. La Commissione applica la politica delle pari opportunità.

La descrizione integrale dei posti offerti, i criteri di selezione e le istruzioni per la presentazione delle candidature si trovano sul sito web

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm.

Per presentare la candidatura on-line cliccare su:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html.

In caso di problemi tecnici, inviare un e-mail a:

admin-management-online@ec.europa.eu.

Il termine ultimo per la presentazione delle candidature è il 6 novembre 2006. Per la presentazione on-line il termine scade alle ore 12 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles.

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IMPRIMIS INTERNATIONAL, INC., No. CIV.S-04-1297 FCD DAD 

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER

ROBERT B. FRAIDENBURGH,

Defendant.

 _____________________________/

This matter came before the Court on August 19, 2005, for

hearing on plaintiff’s motion for sanctions pursuant to Federal Rule

of Civil Procedure 37(d). Stephen Bamberger appeared on behalf of

plaintiff. Shawn M. Krogh appeared on behalf of defendant. Having

considered all written materials submitted in connection with the

motion, and after hearing oral argument, for the reasons set forth on

the record during the hearing on the motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01297-FCD-DAD Document 31 Filed 08/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions is denied;

2. Defendant Robert Fraidenburgh shall make himself

available for deposition in Northern California at a time and

location to be agreed upon by the parties; and

3. The parties are directed to contact Maureen Price, the

courtroom deputy of the district judge assigned to this case, at

(916) 930-4163 to explore the possible modification of the pretrial

scheduling order in this action, which the undersigned finds to be

appropriate under the circumstances.

DATED: August 22, 2005.

DAD:th

ddad1\orders.civil\imprimis1297.oah.081905

Case 2:04-cv-01297-FCD-DAD Document 31 Filed 08/22/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

LAKELAND REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM ) 

) 

Plaintiff, ) 

) 

v. ) Civil Case No. 12-600 (RJL) 

) 

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary ) 

Department of Health and Human Services ) 

) 

Defendant. ) 

:/?._ORDER 

(July J6, 20 13) (Dkts. ##9, 11) 

1-L 

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this 'i_ day of 

July 20 13, it is hereby 

ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #11] is 

GRANTED; and it is further 

ORDERED that plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #9] is DENIED; 

and it is further 

1 
ORDERED that the above-captioned case is DISMISSED with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

United States District Judge 

2
Consent of Independent Public Accountants
                          
                          
We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Registration Statement No. 33-8506 on Form S-8
effective September 25, 1986; in Registration
Statement No. 33-25931 on Form S-8 effective
December 28, 1988; in Registration Statement No. 33-
6880 on Form S-8 as amended by Post-Effective
Amendment No. 1 effective December 22, 1989; in
Registration Statement No. 33-32783 on Form S-8
effective January 11, 1990; in Registration
Statement No. 2-72249 on Form S-3 as amended by Post-
Effective Amendment No. 3 to Form S-16 effective
January 17, 1990; in PostEffective Amendment No. 2
to Registration Statement No. 33-6880 on Form S-8
effective April 9, 1990; in Registration Statement
No. 33-32783 on Form S-8 as amended by Post-
Effective Amendment
No. 1 effective April 9, 1990; in Registration
Statement No. 33-47680 on Form S-8 effective May 5,
1992 in Registration Statement No. 2-72249 on Form S-
3 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to
Form S-16 effective April 7, 1994; in Registration
Statement No. 33-29493 on Form S-8 as amended by
Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 effective September
27, 1994; in Registration Statement No. 33-62671 on
Form S-8 effective September 15, 1995; in
Registration Statement No. 33-62669 on Form S-8
effective September 15, 1995; and in Registration
Statement No. 333-26197 on Form S-8 effective April
30, 1997 by Irwin Financial Corporation of our
report, dated January 21, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements of Irwin Financial
Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and 1997
and for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 1998, which report is incorporated
by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Cincinnati, Ohio
March 26, 1999
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 105 (Monday, June 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 31283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12445]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 105 / Monday, June 2, 2014 / 
Notices

[[Page 31283]]

U.S. AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Notice of Public Information Collection Requirements Submitted to 
OMB for Review; ``Correction''

    The United State Agency for International Development (USAID) 
published a New Information Collection to OMB for review and clearance 
under the Paper work Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 notice in 
the Federal Register on May 1, 2014 (79 FR 24667). OIRA's email address 
and the complete physical address were omitted from the published 
notice on May 1, 2014. As a result USAID is issuing this notice to 
correct and extend the due date to June 16, 2014 to allow the public 
the opportunity to provide any comments.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of May 1, 2014, in FR Doc. 2014-09935, on 
page 24667, in first paragraph, third sentence, correct the SUMMARY 
sentence to read:
SUMMARY: U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has 
submitted the following information collection to OMB for review and 
clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. 
Comments regarding this information collection are best assured of 
having their full effect if received within 30 days of this 
notification. Comments should be addressed to: Desk Officer for USAID, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB), 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503 or email 
address: OIRA Submission@OMB.eop.gov. Copies of submission may be 
obtained by calling (202) 712-5007.

    Dated: May 22, 2014.
Lynn P. Winston,
Chief, Bureau for Management, Office of Management Services, 
Information and Records Division, US Agency for International 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2014-12445 Filed 5-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
Before the Third Division,

September 27, 1948

No. 52555.

petition 6625-R (Seattle).

#### Close & Stewart *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial the customs broker and the sole owner of the petitioner testified that when he prepared the entry he made an error in that he *205failed to include certain items as dutiable items; that he deducted what he thought were the transportation charges, which were shown twice on the invoice and were deducted as one item; and that when it was called to his attention, he paid the increased duty. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.