alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet Security Systems, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of
the Corporation, certifies that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



/s/ THOMAS E. NOONAN
------------------------------
Thomas E. Noonan
Chief Executive Officer, President and
Chairman of the Board
November 13, 2002
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD BARRON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1197 GEB GGH P

vs.

DR. USHA PAI, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01197-GEB-GGH Document 44 Filed 04/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s March 27, 2006 motion 

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: 4/10/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

barr1197.31

Case 2:04-cv-01197-GEB-GGH Document 44 Filed 04/10/06 Page 2 of 2
Pettiford. Marie (OST) 

CONTROL NO 

From: Iynnmillerw@cox.net

Sent: Thursday, March 04, 20105:27 PM 

To: LaHood, Ray (OST) 

Subject: OST~2010-0018 US-Tokyo (Haneda) Combination Services Allo.cation Proceeding 

Chairman Ray LaHood 

Dear Chairman LaHood, 

RE: OST-2010-0018 US-Tokyo (Haneda) Combination Services Allocation Proceeding~~;! 

As a member of the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA and employee of Delta Airlines I am 


asking you approve our application for the slots in Haneda Japan. 


From 1947 to 1978, pre-merger Northwest Airline crew members served Asia from Haneda, 


becoming a strong presence in the Asian market, and in the process, also supporting our economy 


by opening the door to Japan. Over time Northwest Airlines invested a great amount of resources 


since the first flight left the United States for Haneda, establishing strong relationships in the Asian 


market that have lasted through the years. 


Since merging with Delta, we have become one great airline and in our efforts to continue providing 


both our Asian and U.S. 


customers with the best possible service, it is essential we be approved for these slots. 


United is part of the Star Alliance along with All Nippon Airways, serving Haneda, while American is 


part of the oneworld alliance along with Japan Airlines, also serving Haneda. With Haneda being the 


fourth-busiest airport in the world, it is already a popular destination for our business travelers, and 


with our application approval, it will provide a more competitive market. 


We also believe over time, that we will also have the ability to forge alliances with smaller Japanese 


carriers at Haneda, making the transition from the United States to Asian domestic destinations a 


smooth process. 


Unlike many of the crews working the flights that are provided by the alliance partners of U.S carriers 


with existing service to Haneda, jobs on flights operated by Delta will be American jobs. In a time of 


high employment, with the DOT's approval, we will be able to keep jobs in the United States, rather 


than outsourcing work to foreign nationals. 


As a member of the Association of Flight Attendants - CWA and employee of the New Delta, I am 


asking that you approve our application for these new routes. 


Sincerely, 


LYNN MILLER-WUATELET 


3731 carnation glen 


1 
... __ .-i 

escondido, CA 92025 


2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8733]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States. 
Additional information on all bank holding companies may be obtained 
from the National Information Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 23, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Glenda Wilson, Community 
Affairs Officer) 411 Locust Street, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. Central Bancompany, Inc., Jefferson City, Missouri; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Gardner Bancorp, Inc., Gardner, 
Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First Kansas 
Bank and Trust Company, Gardner, Kansas.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant 
Vice President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Lauritzen Corporation, First National of Nebraska, Inc., and 
First National of Illinois, Inc., all of Omaha, Nebraska; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of First Marengo Financial 
Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of First 
National Bank of Marengo, both in Marengo, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 22, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-3312 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
**Exhibit
      23**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**











We
      have
      issued our reports dated September 24, 2007, accompanying the consolidated
      financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of Jaco
      Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
      30, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports
      in
      the Registration Statements of Jaco Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form
      S-8/S-3 (File No. 33-89994, effective March 3, 1995), as amended by
      Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement of Jaco Electronics
      on Form S-8/S-3 (File No. 333-49873, effective April 10, 1998), the Registration
      Statement of Jaco Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8/S-3 (File
      No.
      333-49877, effective April 10, 1998) and the Registration Statement of Jaco
      Electronics, Inc. and Subsidiaries on Form S-8/S-3 (File No. 333-111065,
      effective December 10, 2003).











GRANT
      THORNTON LLP








Melville,
      New York


September
      24, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARIN DEMETRIUS GREENE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0917 MCE DAD P

vs.

SOLANO COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested a 60-day extension of time to file objections to the findings

and recommendations filed on July 24, 2006. Plaintiff states that he does not have access to the

law library and his materials, and that he will be transferred in thirty-five days. The court will

grant plaintiff a limited extension of time. However, no further extensions will be granted. The

purpose of objections is to provide a party with the opportunity to inform the court which

portions of the findings and recommendations to which objection is made. 28 U.S.C. §

636(b)(1)(C). The statute provides a ten-day period for submitting objections. Here, the court

has already provided plaintiff with twice the required time. In addition, in order for plaintiff to

obtain a de novo review by the District Judge, he is not required to provide additional arguments

or evidence.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00917-MCE -DAD Document 69 Filed 08/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's August 14, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted in part; 

and

2. Plaintiff is granted fifteen days from the date of this order in which to file and

serve his objections to the findings and recommendations. Defendants' reply, if any, shall be

filed five days thereafter.

DATED: August 21, 2006.

DAD:4

green917.eot

Case 2:04-cv-00917-MCE -DAD Document 69 Filed 08/21/06 Page 2 of 2
June 23, 1941

No. 46115.

Suit 4334.

#### D. *& B. Import Corp.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 380 affirmed. C. A. D. 172.
**Part 1Fiscal Year 2015 Reporting**

**SUPPLEMENT         SECTION IV**

**USSGL ACCOUNT ATTRIBUTE DEFINITION REPORT**

**Bulletin No. 2016-02                                                              IV ADR - 1IRC Handout 12/3/15**
Exhibit 99.09


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Jaco  Electronics,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-K  for the  fiscal  year  ending  June 30,  2002 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Joel
Girsky, Chairman,  President and Treasurer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





                                          /s/ Joel Girsky
                                          ----------------------------
                                          Joel Girsky
                                          Chairman, President and Treasurer
                                          September 27, 2002
The Wayback Machine - http://web.archive.org/web/20000817192025/http://www.census.gov:80/industry/ma36l...

Current Industrial Reports

United States Department of Commerce

Economics and Statistics Administration

Bureau of the Census

ELECTRIC LIGHTING FIXTURES - 1996

MA36L(96)-1

Issued September 1997

Information about the scope of the survey, methodology, explanation of terms

and historical notes for this survey may be found in the instruction of the

1995 Manufacturing Profiles, issued June 1997.

These data are also available through the U.S. Department of Commerce and

STAT-USA Electronic Bulletin Board by subscription. To access, dial

202-482-3870 and follow the prompts to register; or call 202-482-1986, for

further information.

Inquiries: Address inquiries concerning these data to U.S. Department of

Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Manufacturing and Construction Division,

Washington, DC 20233, or call Zoraida Arledge 301-457-4800.

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

During 1996, the total value of shipments of electric lighting fixtures was

$5,996.8 million. This represents a 1.1 percent increase from the 1995 total

value of $5,930.4 million. The 1996 includes residential type fixtures,

$972.9 million, a decrease of 1.1 percent from 1995; commercial and institutional

type fixtures, $2,855.1 million, an increase of 2.1 percent from 1995; industrial

type fixtures, $674.7 million, a decrease of 0.2 percent from 1995; and outdoor

lighting equipment, $1,494.1 million, an increase of 1.4 percent from 1995.

Vehicular lighting equipment data were discontinued in 1992.

Table 1. Value of Shipments of Electric Lighting Fixtures: 1987 to 1996

[Millions of dollars]

Product

code Product description 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 

1990 1989 1988 1987

 Electric lighting

 fixtures 1/............. 5,996.8 5,930.4 5,548.0 5,115.0 4,720.1 4,426.0 

4,798.2 4,738.0 4,571.8 4,417.8

36451 Residential type............... 972.9 983.8 1,025.1 996.5 898.2 760.9 

827.6 858.5 877.1 916.1

36462 Commercial and institutional

 type (except spotlight)....... 2,855.1 2,797.3 2,633.7 2,390.8 2,221.2 2,164.8 

2,379.7 2,316.7 2,242.7 2,094.8

36463 Industrial type................ 674.7 676.3 554.9 493.4 442.1 446.4 

529.4 504.6 430.6 419.1

36470 Vehicular lighting equipment... (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) (NA) 1,616.1 

1,620.7 1,570.5 1,564.4 1,368.5

36485 Outdoor lighting equipment..... 1,494.1 1,473.0 1,334.2 1,234.2 1,158.6 1,053.9 

1,061.5 1,058.2 1,021.4 987.8

 NA Not available.

 r/ Revised by 5 percent or more from previously published data.

 1/ Excludes Product Class 36470, Vehicular Lighting Equipment, which is not available after

1991.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANNE NELSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1103 DFL KJM PS

vs.

PLACER COUNTY, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Pending before the court is the motion for summary judgment brought by defendants Armstrong,

Bloomfield, McInerney and Meeh and joinder therein by defendant LaBouff. Upon review of the

file and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff has filed numerous pleadings since commencement of this action. 

Many of the pleadings are not pertinent to issues before the court, are duplicative, or not properly

noticed for hearing. In addition, plaintiff has submitted documents relating to the pending

motion for summary judgment in an untimely manner, which interferes with the orderly

disposition of matters brought before the court. See Local Rule 78-230.

 The multiplicity of plaintiff’s filings are a burden on both the court and

defendants and impede the proper prosecution of this action. Plaintiff’s future filings shall 

Case 2:04-cv-01103-DFL -KJM Document 119 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

therefore be limited. Plaintiff may only file the following documents:

a. Proofs of service regarding summons; 

b. One opposition to any motion filed by defendants (and clearly titled as

such);

c. Only one motion pending at any time. Such motion must be properly

noticed for hearing. Plaintiff is limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in support

of the motion and one reply to any opposition; and 

d. One set of objections to any findings and recommendations.

Failure to comply with this order shall result in improperly filed documents being

stricken from the record and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

2. The motion for summary judgment stands submitted. No further briefing on

the pending motion will be considered by the court.

DATED: February 23, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

nelson.lim

Case 2:04-cv-01103-DFL -KJM Document 119 Filed 02/23/06 Page 2 of 2
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION
906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donovan Jones, Chief Executive Officer of CounterPath
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|/s/ Donovan Jones                     | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Donovan Jones                         | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 

September 15, 2008

I, David Karp, Chief Financial Officer of CounterPath
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|/s/ David Karp                                   | 
|------------------------------------------------ | 
|David Karp                                       | 
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary | 

September 15, 2008

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of American BankNote Holographics, Inc. (the “Company”), that the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company atthe end of the period covered by the Report and the results of operations ofthe Company for the period covered by the Report.
|        | By: /s/ Kenneth H. Traub              |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Kenneth H. Traub                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

Date:  May 15, 2006

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to AmericanBank Note Holographics, Inc. and will be retained by American Bank NoteHolographics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:October16,
                2006
            By:
            */s/
              Jay P. Nash*Name:Jay
                P. NashTitle:Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.