alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(b)
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony Christon, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jaclyn, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a)      Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b)      Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)      Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

<PAGE>

         (a)      All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b)      Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting.


Date: September 28, 2004               /s/ ANTHONY CHRISTON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Anthony Christon,
                                       Principal Financial Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Glenn T. Mason,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1123 FCD PAN P

vs. Findings and Recommendations

M. Sandham, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner prosecuting this civil rights

action without counsel. March 17, 2005, the court dismissed

plaintiff’s claims against defendant Gender pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A, with leave to amend. The court informed plaintiff he

could proceed against defendants Sandham, Wilson, Stoval, James,

Barron, Runnel, Jackson, Hlusak and Roche by submitting materials

for service within 15 days, but the court would construe his

election so to proceed as consent to dismissal of his claims

against defendant Gender without leave to amend. 

Case 2:04-cv-01123-FCD-EFB Document 15 Filed 06/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

April 4 and 5, 2005, plaintiff submitted materials for

service of defendants Sandham, Wilson, Stoval, James, Barron,

Runnel, Jackson, Hlusak and Roche. I find plaintiff has

consented to dismissal of claims against defendant Gender without

leave to amend. 

Accordingly, the court hereby recommends that claims against

defendant Gender be dismissed without prejudice. 

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: May 31, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01123-FCD-EFB Document 15 Filed 06/01/05 Page 2 of 2
#### SAVINGS BANKS TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK, Defendant-Appellee, and American Savings Bank, Defendant.

No. 1355, Docket 84-7129.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued June 7, 1984.

Decided June 27, 1984.

Peter J. Mastaglio, Garden City, N.Y. (Terry D. Weissman, Cullen & Dykman), Garden City, N.Y., for plaintiff-appellant.

Joseph P. Dailey, New York City (Joseph J. Tesoriero, Breed, Abbott & Morgan), New York City, for defendant-appellee.

Before OAKES and WINTER, Circuit Judges, and MISHLER, District Judge.*

*

 The Honorable Jacob Mishler, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM:

The present case arose out of the theft of a signed but otherwise incomplete teller’s check drawn on an account maintained by Franklin Savings Bank with the plaintiff, Savings Banks Trust Company (“Savings”). Savings received a written stop payment order with respect to the check in question from Franklin. Persons not involved in the present litigation completed the check and proceeded to deposit it in a North Carolina bank. The check came into possession of the defendant Federal Reserve Bank of New York through ordinary collection channels and was presented to Savings for payment. Savings failed to *574dishonor the check or to apprise the defendant of an intention to dishonor within the time specified by the Thrift Institution Collection Arrangement and New York Uniform Commercial Code Section 4-212 (McKinney 1964). Defendant thereupon debited Savings’ account in the amount of the check and Savings brought the present action to recover the amount in question.

Savings’ action against the Federal Reserve Bank is based on a claim that it breached the presenter’s warranty of no material alterations in the check in question as provided by New York Uniform Commercial Code § 4-207(l)(c) (McKinney 1964). However, Section 4-207 accords such a warranty only to a “payor bank ... who in good faith pays or accepts the item.”

Savings argues that the requisite “good faith” exists even when a party has sound reason to be suspicious so long as it does not have actual guilty knowledge. However, knowledge and disregard of suspicious circumstances are sufficient to vitiate an assertion of good faith where negotiable instruments are concerned. *In Re Legel Braswell Government Securities Corp.,*695 F.2d 506 (11th Cir.1983); *Otten v. Marasco,*235 F.Supp. 794 (S.D.N.Y.1964), *aff'd*353 F.2d 563 (2d Cir.1965). *See also*H. Bailey, *Brady on Bank Checks*§ 8.5 (1984 Cum.Supp. No. 1). Since receipt of the stop order by Savings imparted knowledge of suspicious circumstances sufficient to bar an action under Section 4-207, we affirm.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         316,388
<SECURITIES>                                   251,614
<RECEIVABLES>                                      250
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               572,435
<PP&E>                                           8,788
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,535
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 663,071
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,653
<BONDS>                                            112
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       679,950
<OTHER-SE>                                    (36,828)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   663,071
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,965
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,383)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)


</TABLE>
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Search an Audit Log Online

To search an audit log, complete the following steps:

To search an audit log, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, click Audit. The Search Audit Logs page appears.

2. Enter your search criteria.

Under Search Criteria, optional

• Select a Module type

• Enter a User

• Select an OTC Endpoint

• Enter the From and To date and time ranges, required

• Select a Keyword, required

• Select a Category Name, required

• Enter the Terminal ID

• Enter the Batch ID

• Select an Event Type

• Select an Operation Mode

• Module drop-down options vary by user role. Module options include 

Administration, Check Capture, Check Processing, Card Processing, and 

Deposit Processing. 

• The From and To Created On Date must be entered in MM/DD/YYYY format and 

cannot exceed 30 days.

• The Keyword and Category Name drop-down options vary by user role. 

Operation Mode options include All, Online, or Offline.

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Event Types are categories of events that are recorded by the audit log.

Table 1. Event Types

Event Type Description

All Includes all event types in the audit log 

Error Error entries are created when the system is unable to 

complete an action.

Informational Information entries are general records of the activity that has 

happened while using OTCnet.

Warning Warning entries are created to inform the user when events of 

note have taken place. This includes cancelling an action, 

deleting information from the system and inactive users.

3. Click Search. The Search Results table appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Audit Log Output

• Run a search (select a module type, FROM and TO dates, and a keyword).

o The search results include all activities in the system that you have access to 

view. 

o Run additional searches, the Search Results table repopulates with the results of 

the new search. 

• Click Download to download the search results. 

• Click Print Audit Log Records to print a formatted audit log record.

• If the audit log records contain Personally Identifiable Information (PII) the data is 

masked.

4. Click the Audit Log ID hyperlink to view additional details for an individual audit log entry. 

The View Audit Log Details page appears as shown in Figure 2.

Application Tip

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 2: Sample View Audit Log Details Page

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

• Click Return Home to the OTCnet Home Page.

Additional Buttons
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

JESSE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. FANNON, et al,

Defendants.

2:04-CV-1317 MCE GGH P

 ORDER

On October 2, 2006, Defendants filed a request to vacate the scheduling order pending

adjudication of their dispositive motion. In consideration, the Court finds good cause to vacate

the scheduling order.

IT IS SO ORDERED. The Court’s January 20, 2006, scheduling order is hereby

vacated in its entirety subject to being reset should there be a need.

Dated: 10/5/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

__________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

wash1317.vac

Case 2:04-cv-01317-MCE -GGH Document 80 Filed 10/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Case 2:04-cv-01317-MCE -GGH Document 80 Filed 10/05/06 Page 2 of 2
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 107 ) ll-E-6 7 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:06

AM Sheet 107 of 264P. 2 

## APR - 7-9 7 HON

14:5 9 CRAN E CO RTE C 01/02/9 7 14:4 0 ©1B19941023 4 

## FA X NO . 335217 1 PB S BT P NC 

## P. 0 2 ©002/00 2 A U 

## J Z 

## dr, Contac t Repor t Plasti c Composite s NESHA P From : Gre g LaFlam , Pacifi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Melani e Proctor , PE S Madelein e Siruro , EPA/ES D Dale : Marc h 11,1996/Apri l 1,199 7 CoM-iiict : Mar k Smith , Jo aPrio r C'>*'Mi>any: Co r Tec , Wasliingio n Cour

t House , O H T^-pSioneNi :v\he n (614 ) 335-626 2 Corne t Six-'..ii-aj-y : * Discuss' * c l th e facility' s munufp.cUiiiu g processe s s o tba

t th e processe s cDuldb e assigne d t o ii-,- j prope r subcategories . 'i'Jl*

e facilit y nuuiufiwhiK s panel s usin g ge l coat o r films, resin, glas s rciuCurccnieiit , an d plywood , fabricatio n i s carrie dou t i n tw o separat

e proces s steps . Th e first ste p i s asemi-continuous , batc h process , ge l coat applicatio n step . Th e ge l coa t i s auiomaticall y spraye dont o filmwhic h i s pulle dpas t areciprocatin g spra

y gu n b y achain . N o ove n i s use dfo

r curing , bu t

emission s fromgel coa

t applicatio n are sen t

to Ih c facility' s ir.ctaerator . 'Hi e secon dste p involve s placin g th e ge l coate dfil monto on e o f

si x specia l table s wliic h operat e a s th e botto mhal f o f amol dfor

th e panel . The resi n i s dispense dfromperforate d trough s whic h mov e dow n th e tabi c over th e panel . A vacuumbag i s the n place dove r th e core , icsin , glass , an dfinis h coa t Th e oven s alternate from

, on e tabl e t o th e nex t

an dcombin e wit h th e ba g t o cur e ih e pane l i n a20-3 0 minut e cycle . Th e cardboar dtrough s ar e drie di n a n enclosure . [Apri l 199 7 update : "Hr

afacilit y fonceil y controlle dstyrea e vapor emission s fiomtroug h fillin g an d diyin g usin g th e Incinerator , bu t i s no t presently doin g so . Thes e emission s ar c low * an dth e f**wUl y i s no t require dt o coatro l themunder it*bperatin

g permi t Th e exces s capacity ofth e incinerato r

i s bein g use dfo

r otiie r purposes. ] Th e facilit y use s dibasi c ester

fo r cleanin g (n o methylen e chloride) . Fille r conten t ofth e resi n matri x i s approximatel y 3 5 percent , bu t ca n b e varied . Tiieir

mixer ha s asmal l porthol e t o receive th e filler

(o r i t can b e covere dcompletely) , Th e mixe r shaf t i s mounte d1hiwg h th ? to p usin g bearin g mounls , wit h n o visibl e gaps . The compan y representative s believe dtha t mos t mixer s hav e n o visibl e gap s i n th e top . REPOR T I S ACCURATE
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Cyco.net,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  each  of the
undersigned,  in the  capacities  and  on  the  dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.


       By:  /s/   Richard A. Urrea   November 22, 2004
         -------------------------
         Richard A. Urrea
         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       22
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8776-8777]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3327]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST]


Group No. 191, Minnesota; Eastern States: Filing of Plat of 
Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Minnesota.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston 
Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands we surveyed are:

Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota

T. 141 N., R. 40 W.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a 
portion of the subdivisional lines; and the dependent resurvey and 
survey of the subdivision of sections 10, 11, 12, 15, 24 and 36, 
Township 141 North, Range 40 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, 
in the State of Minnesota, and was accepted February 15, 2007.

    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be available to the public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the 
plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.


[[Page 8777]]


    Dated: February 15, 2007.
Jerry L. Wahl,
Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
FR Doc. E7-3327 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
From:	Dean, Warren SEA <warren.dean@siemens.com>
Sent:	Monday, June 08, 2009 3:30 PM
To:	Schaffner, Karen S.
Subject:	RE: NOx Chapters:  Siemens TDL NH3 slip

OK

-----Original Message-----
From: Schaffner, Karen S. [mailto:ksschaffner@rti.org]
Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 1:23 PM
To: Dean, Warren SEA
Subject: NOx Chapters: Siemens TDL NH3 slip

Good Afternoon, Mr. Dean:  Thank you very much for the information on Siemens TDL ammonia 
monitoring system you shared today.  I have included a summary of our discussion below and hopefully I 
understood you clearly.  Please feel free to correct me or expand on.  Thank you, Karen Schaffner



The Siemens TDL for ammonia monitoring is in place at approximately 90 to 100 full-scale coal-fired 
units in the U.S.  Facilities measure NH3 slip concentration after the SCR (and SNCR) and before the air 
heater.
Some facilities measure at up to 3 points in the duct between the SCR and AH (for example, at 10 foot 
distances) to account for or eliminate any stratification.  The Siemens TDL unit has a capital cost of 
approximately $40,000 for one point of measurement; measurement at three points could be up to 
$70,000 for capital cost.







Karen Schaffner

Air Quality Engineering Group

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Rd (800 Park, C311)

Research Triangle Park, NC  27709

phone:  (919) 316 3740

fax:  (919) 541 7155
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

JAMES WHITTED : NO. 05-598-02

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2015, upon consideration of defendant’s 

motion under 28 U.S.C. §2255 to vacate, set aside or correct sentence it is ORDERED: 

1. The motion is DENIED.

2. There are no grounds for a certificate of appealability.

3. The Clerk shall close this case. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Michael M. Baylson

__________________________

Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

O:\CRIMINAL CASES\05-598 HARRIS, US V\05CR598-2.102315.ORDER.2255.DOCX

Case 2:05-cr-00598-MMB Document 781 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1097

PHILLIP BONEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:17-cv-00633-RJC-DCK)

Submitted: June 18, 2019 Decided: June 20, 2019

Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Phillip Boney, Appellant Pro Se. Corrine Lenore Lusic, NORTH CAROLINA 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Phillip Boney seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary 

judgment in favor of the North Carolina Department of Public Safety in Boney’s 

employment discrimination action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction 

because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or 

order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. 

App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on December 20, 2018. The 

notice of appeal was filed on January 23, 2019. Because Boney failed to file a timely 

notice of appeal* or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 * Boney mailed his notice of appeal by priority express mail and it was scheduled 

for delivery on January 21, 2019. However, it was not received by the clerk’s office until 

January 23, 2019, and therefore was not timely filed. See Fed. R. App. P 25(a)(2)(A)(i).