alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31(b)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Anthony Christon, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jaclyn, Inc.;

2.  Based on my  knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a  material  fact  or  omit  to  state  a  material  fact  necessary to make the
statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and  I are responsible for
establishing  and  maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    (a)   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls  and  procedures  to  be designed under our supervision, to
ensure  that  material  information  relating  to  the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    (b)   Evaluated the  effectiveness  of  the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and   presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness  of  the  disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    (c)   Disclosed  in  this  report  any  change  in the registrant's internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred during the registrant's most
recent  fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or  is  reasonably  likely to
materially  affect,  the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other  certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most  recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's  auditors  and  the  audit  committee  of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

    (a)   All  significant  deficiencies  and  material weaknesses in the design
or  operation  of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    (b)   Any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: September 26, 2007           /s/ ANTHONY CHRISTON
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Anthony Christon, Principal Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          49,257
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,938
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,606
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          42,263
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            43,278
<LOANS>                                        412,525
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,620
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,038,307
<DEPOSITS>                                     563,999
<SHORT-TERM>                                   310,279
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             43,238
<LONG-TERM>                                     21,575
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,965
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,038,307
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 36,450
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,949
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                22,762
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                64,161
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,868
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,568
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           35,593
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,073
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                115,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,449
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      32,449
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,083
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.50<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     .05<F1>
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,779
<LOANS-PAST>                                       620
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,863
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    2,490
<RECOVERIES>                                       390
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,620
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,431
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,189
<FN>
<F1>INFORMATION NOT IN 1,000
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order - Barbarin v. Scribner, Warden

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

ROBERT R. ANDERSON

Chief Assistant Attorney General

GERALD A. ENGLER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

PEGGY S. RUFFRA

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

GREGORY A. OTT

Deputy Attorney General

State Bar No. 160803

 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000

 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004

 Telephone: (415) 703-5964

 Fax: (415) 703-1234

 Email: gregory.ott@doj.ca.gov

Attorneys for Respondent

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY BARBARIN,

Petitioner,

v.

A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV S 04-0894 FCD KJM P

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent may have until

September 29, 2005, to file his answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. If the response to

the habeas petition is an answer, petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days

after service of the answer. If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner’s opposition

or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after service

of the motion, and respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fifteen days thereafter.

DATED: August 17, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00894-MDS Document 22 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 1
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersigned, Erik Lagerway, President and COO of Xten Networks, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Xten Networks, Inc. for the nine month period ended January 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Xten Networks Inc.

Dated: March 17, 2005
| /s/ Erik Lagerway |
|-------------------|

Erik Lagerway

President and COO (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 10(f)


                             JACOBSON STORES INC.

                                     1999
                          Management Incentive Plan

Senior management incentives are based on accomplishing the key goals of our
business plan. Incentives are structured to strive for excellence.

The management incentive plan is designed to:

     o foster an awareness of the Company's objective of consistent,
       profitable operation.

     o motivate senior management to meet the shorter term needs of
       shareholders without sacrificing long-term profitability.

     o encourage senior management to "stretch" for higher levels of
       performance in the future.

     o establish target incentives for each participant so that each person
       is aware of what payout percentages can be expected with various
       levels of accomplishment.

     o encourage retention of key employees.

The principal features of the plan include:

     o participation limited to salaried officers of the Company.

     o specific performance criteria and weightings established at the
       beginning of the year for each participant (at the most senior level,
       primary emphasis placed on corporate goal achievement; at the VP-Staff
       level, primary emphasis placed on individual goal achievement).

     o potential payout as a percent of the base salary of each participant
       as follows:

                                    Threshold  Target     Maximum
                                    ---------  ------     -------
Chairman/CEO/President                  0%       35%       52.2%
Vice Chairman                           0        30        45
EVP - Marketing & Stores                0        30        45
SVPs                                    0        25        37.5
VP - Regional Director of Stores        0        20        30
VP - DMM                                0        20        30
VP - Operations                         0        20        30
VP - Staff Positions                    0        15        22.5


     o Threshold corporate performance criteria (announced at the beginning
       of the year) to be achieved before any payout is made under the plan.


                                                                    (3/25/99)
No. 61348.

protests 248762-K, etc. (New York).

#### Union Carbide & Carbon Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protests were dismissed.
(Reap. Dec. 8159)

#### Hawley & Letzerich *v.*United States

Entry No. 110.

(Decided August 5, 1952)

*Philip Stein*for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(John J. Antus,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement presents a somewhat unusual situation in that the appeal was filed prior to any appraisement being made by the appraiser and while the appeal was pending before this court the collector proceeded to liquidate the entry. The official records show that the appeal was filed with the collector on May 15, 1950, and-the appraisement of the merchandise was made on March 30, 1951, while the entry was liquidated on July 31, 1951.

When the case was called for a hearing, counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the same on the ground that it had been prematurely filed. Ruling on the motion was reserved, and is now before me for disposition. The record, as set out above, fully supports the motion to dismiss. The motion is granted and the appeal is accordingly dismissed. Of course, as long as this appeal was pending before this court, the collector had no final appraised value upon which to base a legal liquidation. It is my view, however, that the question of the legality of the liquidation is not before me in this proceeding. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4076 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4076

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1077 River Road, Suite 1, in Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania, as 
                 the ``Susan C. Barnhart Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 8, 2024

  Mr. Casey (for himself and Mr. Fetterman) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 1077 River Road, Suite 1, in Washington Crossing, Pennsylvania, as 
                 the ``Susan C. Barnhart Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SUSAN C. BARNHART POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1077 River Road, Suite 1, in Washington Crossing, 
Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated as the ``Susan C. Barnhart 
Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Susan C. 
Barnhart Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZYDA

Christopher J. ZydaSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II 

 Plaintiff, No. 2:04-cv-1225 MCE AC P 

 vs. 

TOM L. CAREY, et al. 

 Defendants. ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 / AD TESTIFICANDUM

 Earnest Cassell Woods, II, inmate #D-58091, a necessary and material participant in a 

hearing in this case on November 4, 2015, is confined at California State Prison-Centinela, 2302 

Brown Road, Imperial, CA 92251, in the custody of the Warden; in order to secure this inmate’s 

attendance it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the 

custodian to produce the inmate before the Honorable Allison Claire, to appear by telephonicconferencing at California State Prison-Centinela on November 4, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. 

 

 ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: 

 1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court, 

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a hearing by 

telephonic-conferencing before the United States District Court at the time and place above, until 

completion of the hearing or as ordered by the court; 

 2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate 

and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; 

 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to fax a courtesy copy of this order and writ of 

habeas corpus ad testificandum to the Litigation Coordinator at California State Prison-Centinela 

at (760) 337-7650. 

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM 

To: The Warden of California State Prison-Centinela, 2302 Brown Road, Imperial, CA 

92251: 

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to participate in a hearing 

before the United States District Court at the time and place above by telephonic-conferencing, 

until completion of the hearing or as ordered by the court. 

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the 

inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

DATED: October 15, 2015 

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 364 Filed 10/16/15 Page 1 of 1
No. 53540.

protests 138241-K, etc. (New York).

#### The A. W. Fenton Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 6453.

#### AUTO REPAIR & GARAGE COMPANY vs. NEW ORLEANS RAILWAY & LIGHT COMPANY.

Syllabus.

Involves only issues of fact.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “E,” No. 107,993. Honorable Gr. H. Theard, Judge.

Stafford & Robinson, for plaintiff and appellant.

Hall, Monroe & Lemann, for defendant and appellee.

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and' decree of the Court, as follows:

This case involves only issues of fact. From .a judgment adverse to plaintiff, the latter appeals. The matter is submitted on briefs.

The evidence is somewhat conflicting, but on the whole the facts are about as follows:

A party of three were riding in an automobile, whicii owing to a puncture, had lost a tire.

Whilst attempting to cross the track in front of one of defendant’s cars, the left front wheel of the automobile, from which the tire was missing, caught against the nail, causing the machine to slide along the track in the direction of the approaching car.

For some reason, wholly immaterial and perhaps quite natural under the circumstances, the man at the wheel lost control, and in spite of all his efforts could neither turn out of the track nor back the machine.

On the other hand the motorman of the oncoming car did not perceive at once the real situation; but as soon as *56he did so he made every effort to stop his car. In this,, however, he was unsuccessful, being then too close; so that the two vehicles slid together and each received some slight damage.

Opinion and decree, December 6th, 1915.

Irrelevant, narrative and argumentative matters eliminated, this is substantially the testimony of LeBlanc, who was operating' the automobile, of Pillsbury, who was with him, and of the motorman. The only conflict between their testimony (more apparent- than real) being whether or not one or the other of the two vehicles had actually come to a full stop at the moment of the collision. There are other witnesses whose testimony is generally to the same effect.

Upon this state of facts it is clear that there is no room to charge the motorman with fault. The emergency arose suddenly and unexpectedly, and as soon as it arose he did all that he could to escape what was then already inevitable.

Another witness, however, (Chambers, the third occupant of the automobile) makes out a better case for plaintiff, to-wit, that the automobile had 'been stalled for some minutes upon the track in full view of the motorman who was then half a block off, but who instead of making any effort to stop, “deliberately” speeded up his car and recklessly ran into the automobile “full blast.”

But the trial Judge evidently pinned no faith to the testimony of this witness, who is contradicted by every other witness and by all the circumstances; and neither do we.

Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3645]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release Nos. 33-8782, 34-55350; File No. 4-532]


Roundtable on International Financial Reporting Standards 
``Roadmap''

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Notice of roundtable meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Tuesday, March 6, 2007 the Securities and Exchange 
Commission will hold a roundtable discussion on the ``roadmap'' 
regarding International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The 
roadmap describes the path toward eliminating the need for non-U.S. 
companies to reconcile to U.S. GAAP financial statements they prepare 
pursuant to IFRS issued by the International Accounting Standards Board 
in filings with the Commission. The subject matter of the roundtable 
will be the effect on the capital raising process in the U.S. capital 
markets with respect to the roadmap, the effect on investors in the 
U.S. capital markets with respect to the roadmap, and the effect on 
issuers in the U.S capital markets with respect to the roadmap. 
Representative(s) of the following have been invited to participate: 
Issuers, investors, securities counsel, underwriters, credit rating 
agencies, stock exchanges, academia, and audit firms.
    The roundtable will take place at the Commission's headquarters at 
100 F Street, NE., Auditorium, Room L-002, Washington, DC at 10 a.m. 
The public is invited to observe the roundtable discussions. Seating is 
available on a first-come, first-serve basis.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katrina Kimpel at (202) 551-5313.

    Dated: February 26, 2007.

    By the Commission.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3645 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P
Exhibit No. 21

                          JOURNAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

The following list shows the significant subsidiaries of the Company as of March
6, 2002, their respective states of incorporation and the percentage of voting
securities of each subsidiary owned by its immediate parent. All companies
listed have been included in the consolidated financial statements filed
herewith.


                                          State             Percent of Voting
                                           of               Securities Owned
Subsidiary                             Incorporation          by Registrant
----------                             -------------        -----------------
Journal Sentinel Inc.                    Wisconsin         100% by Registrant
Journal Broadcast Corporation*
 (d/b/a Journal Broadcast Group)         Nevada            100% by Registrant
NorthStar Print Group, Inc.              Wisconsin         100% by Registrant
Add, Inc.                                Wisconsin         100% by Registrant
NorLight Telecommunications, Inc.        Wisconsin         100% by Registrant
IPC Communication Services, Inc.*        Michigan          100% by Registrant

----------------

*    Journal Broadcast Corporation has three subsidiaries operating in the
     United States and IPC Communications, Inc. has one subsidiary operating in
     France.

On January 1, 2001, a merger took place to combine NorLight Telecommunications,
Inc. and PrimeNet Marketing Services, Inc. PrimeNet Marketing Services, Inc. was
formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Also on January 1, 2001,
Label Products & Design, Inc. merged into NorthStar Print Group, Inc. Label
Products & Design was formerly a wholly-owned subsidiary of NorthStar Print
Group, Inc.

The Company has no controlling parent. 25,920,000 shares, or ninety percent, of
the Company's issued common stock at March 6, 2002, are owned of record by the
Stock Trust. The right to vote these shares in most instances resides in the
unitholders. Accordingly, the Company is not controlled by the Stock Trust and
does not consider it to be a "parent" of the Company within the meaning of
Regulation 12b-2. See Item 12 "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management."

                                       63