alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
TIMOTHY WAYNE GUESS, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, V. Civil ActionNo. ERIC HOLDER, U.S. Attorney General, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED SEP 2 62012 Clerk, 

### u.s. District &Bankruptcy Courtsforthe Districtof Columbia


# 12 1603

This matter is before the Court onthe plaintiffs application to proceed informapauperis andhispro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and dismiss the complaint. Itappears that the plaintiffis serving a term ofimprisonment imposed by the United States District for the Eastern District ofVirginia upon his conviction for various drug and weapons offenses. See Compl. at 4, 5. Generally, he alleges that the statutes under whichhe
was prosecuted and sentenced were not properly enacted, that the sentencing court lacked subject matterjurisdiction overhis criminal case, resulting in his false imprisonment. The plaintiff brings a claim against the Attorney General under Bivens v. Six Unknown NamedAgents of the FederalBureau ofNarcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), and asks the Court to declare the statutes invalid and to orderhis immediate release.



# ---- ---....__ The Court

## c~nstrues the complaint as a challenge to the legality ofthe plaintiffs criminal sentence. He must present such a claim to the sentencing court in a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Taylor v. US. Ed. of Parole, 194 F.2d 882, 883 (D.C. Cir. 1952) (stating that a motionunder Section 2255 is the proper vehicle for challenging the constitutionality ofa statute under which a defendant is convicted). Section 2255 provides specifically that: [a] prisoner in custody under sentence ofa court established by Act ofCongress claiming the right to be released upon the ground that the sentence was imposed in violation ofthe Constitution or laws ofthe United States, or that the court was withoutjurisdiction to impose such sentence, or that the sentence was in excess of the maximum authorized by law, or is otherwise subject to collateral attack, may move the court which imposed the sentence to vacate, set aside orcorrect the sentence. 28 U.S.C. 

### §2255(a) (emphasis added). Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint. An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

# /:_~/lu:l 

# j 

# H Uv<Jc____ United States District Judge DATE:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant’s First Request for EOT

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. FLYNN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MARIA G. CHAN, State Bar No. 192130

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 323-1940

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Rose

SF2004401281

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY L. BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al. ,

Defendants.

NO. CIV S-04-0055 LKK GGH-P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S FIRST REQUEST

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

DISCOVERY REQUESTS

Defendants’ first request for an extension of time to served Plaintiff’s with Defendant’s

response to the First Request for Admissions and Second Request for Production of Documents

was considered by the Court, and good cause appearing, Defendant’s request is granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have until September 1, 2005 to serve

Plaintiff with responses to the discovery requests..

DATED: 8/30/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

___________________________ 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States Magistrate Judge

br55.eot.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-00055-LKK -GGH Document 41 Filed 08/30/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1317 MCE GGH P

vs.

J. FANNON, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ June 30, 2006, request to extend the time to file a dispositive

motion is granted;

2. The dispositive motion cut-off date of June 30, 2006, is vacated and re-set for

September 4, 2006.

DATED: 7/21/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:kj

wash1317.eot(1)

Case 2:04-cv-01317-MCE -GGH Document 69 Filed 07/21/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Michael Grady LOCKLEAR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel L. STIENEKE; Michael F. Easley, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 01-6230.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 19, 2001.

Michael Grady Locklear, pro se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Michael Grady Locklear seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 *&*Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeala-bility and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *Locklear v. Stieneke,*No. CA-98-17-1-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
### MEMORANDUM

TO: Lisa Biddle, US EPA/OW/EAD FROM: Meghan Camp, ERG DATE: 18 July 2013 SUBJECT: Materials for the Mississippi Lime Production & Produced Water Congress 2013 On June 26 th 

### and 27 th 

### , ERG the Mississippi Lime Produced Water Conference in Oklahoma City, OK. The conference materials in the following table are provided as attachments:

### Memorandum

1 8 July 2013 Page 2 of 2

2 Table 1. Mississippi Lime Produced Water 201 3 Presentations Referenced in Summary Reference Presentation File Name Presenter Name and Affiliation Presentation Title Black, 2013 10 - day - one - 1100 - galyn - black chesapeake - energy.pdf Galyn Black, Chesapeake Energy Case Study: Design, Implementation and Operation of an Effective Water Transfer System in the Mississippi Lime Colwell, 2013 8 - day - one - 0840 - cecil - colwell.pdf Cecil Colwell, Source Energy Development of Cost - Effective Systems for Handling Produced Water Dees, 2013 16 - day - one - 1335 - john - dees - reeder energy.pdf John Dees, Reeder Energy Mississippi Lime Production & Produced Water Congress 2013

– Re - Using Produced Water Dorn, 2013 15 - day - one - 1335 - forest - dorn iofina - resources - inc.pdf Forrest Dorn, Iofina plc Re - Using Produced Water Garwood, 2013 1 7 - day - one - 1510 - dan - garwood highmount - eandp.pdf Dan Garwood, HighMount E&P How Operators are Minimizing Costs Associated with Gathering and Transporting Produced Water from Wells to Disposal Plants Harpham, 2013 41 - day - one - 830 - stephen - harpham dorado - eandp.pdf Stephen Harpham, Dorado E&P Partners Opening Remarks Murray, 2013 9 - day - one - 0920 - kyle - murray oklahoma - geological - survey.pdf Kyle Murr ay, Oklahoma Geological Survey Examining Water Production Volumes and Produced Water Quality in the Mississippi Lime to Develop Appropriate Management Strategies Smith, 2013 45 - day - two - 1450 - daniel - smith petro - river.pdf Daniel Smith, PetroRiver Oil Optimizing Pressure Drawdown to Improve Oil Recovery Tipton, 2013 18 - day - one - 1635 - steve - tiption newfield - exploration.pdf Steven Tipton, Newfield Exploration Company Outlining Water Storage Options for Fracturing Operations to Highlight Economic Options Unruh, 2013 24 - day - one - 1715 - don - unruh - part one - sullivan - and - co.pdf 25 - day - one - 1715 - don - unruh - part two - sullivan - and - co.pdf Don Unruh, Sullivan and Co. Pinpointing Oil - Water Contact Zones to Identify the Higher Oil Cut, Lower Water Saturation Areas in the Mi ssissippi Lime and Chat
<TABLE> <S> <C>



        <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
BALANCE SHEET, THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, AND THE STATEMENT OF CASH
FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         512,668
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               512,688
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 512,688
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,493
<OTHER-SE>                                     482,195
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   512,688
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                810,206
<INCOME-TAX>                                   275,687
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   810,206
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.04)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC. AS OF AND
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          28,593
<SECURITIES>                                   110,670
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                       999
<INVENTORY>                                      1,392
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               187,003
<PP&E>                                          25,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           43,682
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,566
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,534
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,787
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,595
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,740
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,855
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,855
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 2413

PATRICIA LEVIEGE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. VODAFONE US INC., d/b/a Vodafone Americas , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv - 00374

- LMB

- IDD )

Submitted : May 23, 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Monique Antonia Miles, OLD TOWNE ASSOCIATES, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Emily Crandall Harlan, NIXON PEABODY LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not bind ing precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Patricia Leviege appeals the district court’s orders granting Vodafone US Inc.’s (Vodafone) motion to dismiss Leviege’s employment discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims against Vodafone, and denying Leviege’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 (b) motion for reconsideration of the dismissal order. We have considered the parties’ arguments and have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Leviege v. Vodafone US Inc. , No. 1:16

- cv 00374

- LMB

- IDD ( E.D. Va

. Oct. 4, 2016 & Nov. 9 , 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not ai d the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit
32.2






Section 1350 Certification
of Principal Financial Officer







The
undersigned the Executive Vice President, Finance, and Secretary of Jaco
Electronics, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
the Company for the year ended June 30, 2008 (the “Annual Report”) accompanying
this certification fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
the dates and for the periods presented as required by such report. The
foregoing certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities
as principal financial officer of the Company, my own due diligence and
representations made by certain other members of the Company’s senior
management.







Date:  September
29, 2008





/s/ Jeffrey D.
Gash


Jeffrey
D. Gash


Executive
Vice President, Finance and Secretary


(Principal
Financial Officer)
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-08-271-CV

STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT	APPELLANT	

	V.

CONSTANCE E. MCKINNEY 	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE  67thTH  DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.  

DELIVERED:  November 61320, 2008
LISTING OF SUBSIDIARIES


                                                                 Percentage
                                                                 of Voting
                                                   Place of      Securities
                    Name                         Organization      Owned
--------------------------------------------     ------------    ----------

Significant subsidiaries of the company:

  Acme Brick Company                               Delaware         100%
  American Tile Supply, Inc.                       Delaware         100%
  Featherlite Building Products Corporation        Delaware         100%
  Footwear Management Company                      Delaware         100%
     d/b/a Justin Boot Company
     d/b/a Nocona Boot Company
     d/b/a Tony Lama Company, Inc.
  Justin Management Company                        Delaware         100%
     d/b/a Justin Management Company
     d/b/a Northland Publishing Company, Inc.
  Tradewinds Technologies, Inc.                    Delaware         100%

  All other subsidiaries are omitted from this list because they do not,
considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, constitute a significant
subsidiary.  All wholly-owned subsidiaries are included in the consolidated
financial statements.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4315 — GE/CS/GIMP/JV)

(2006/C 268/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 1 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Exhibit
32.2





Written
Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350





Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Interstate Power and Light
Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.








/s/
William D. Harvey


William
D. Harvey


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer





/s/
Patricia L. Kampling


Patricia
L. Kampling


Executive
Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





February
26, 2010
```
School-Linked Human Services: A Comprehensive Strategy for Aiding
Students at Risk of School Failure (Letter Report, 12/30/93,
GAO/HRD-94-21).

Since 1980, at least 8 states and more than 200 localities have been
delivering a variety of health, social, and educational services to
students--many of whom are at risk of failing in school or dropping out.
These comprehensive school-linked programs are trying to improve the
academic performance and well-being of at-risk students by addressing
their many needs in a coordinated manner at schools.  Some policymakers
view these programs as an efficient, cost-effective way to link at-risk
children and their families with prevention and early intervention
services.  This report (1) reviews the literature to determine the kinds
of school-linked approaches involving students and their families, the
relative strengths and weaknesses of these approaches, and the
circumstances under which each appears most appropriate; (2) identifies
the problems encountered when using the school as a hub for delivering
services; and (3) determines the role that the federal government could
play in promoting promising school-linked approaches.

--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------

 REPORTNUM:  HRD-94-21
     TITLE:  School-Linked Human Services: A Comprehensive Strategy for 
             Aiding Students at Risk of School Failure
      DATE:  12/30/93
   SUBJECT:  Program management
             Educational programs
             Students
             Head-start programs
             Disadvantaged persons
             Education program evaluation
             Public assistance programs
             State-administered programs
             Attrition rates
IDENTIFIER:  Medicaid Program
             Social Services Block Grant
             Special Supplemental Food Program for Women, Infants, and 
             Children
             WIC
             Even Start Program
             Dept. of Education Chapter 1 Program for Educationally 
             Disadvantaged Children
             DOL Summer Training and Education Program
             
************************************************************************

We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.

See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or 
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]
```
EXHIBIT 10.4










NON-INTEREST BEARING PROMISSORY NOTE












	
$125,000.00

	
October 4, 2016















For value received, I, we or either and each of us, whether maker, endorser, or any other party hereto, jointly, severally and in solido, promise to pay to the order of Powin Corporation, a Nevada corporation, ONE HUNDRED TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND NO/100 U.S. DOLLARS ($125,000.00), with no interest bearing upon this note, which said amount shall be due and payable in four (4) consecutive annual installments of THIRTY-ONE THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED FIFTY AND NO/100 U.S. DOLLARS ($31,250.00) on each of December 31, 2017, December 31, 2018, December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2020.







This note may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time without penalty or premium.







Principal hereon is payable at 20550 SW 115th Avenue, Tualatin, Oregon, 97062 or such other place as the holder of this note shall designate in writing.







Any partial prepayment shall be applied and credited to the next annual installment payment(s) due under this note, such that in the event that any annual installment payment has been fully credited due to a partial prepayment, the maker of this note may, but shall not be required to, make further payment for that year.  In the event that any annual installment payment has been partially credited due to a partial prepayment, the maker of this note shall only be required to pay the remaining balance due for that year’s installment payment.







If any one of the installments of this note is not paid when due, then, upon receipt of written notice from the holder of this note, the maker of this note shall make payment within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written notice. Upon failure of the maker of this note to make payment within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written notice, the holder of this note shall have the option to put the maker of this note in default.







The maker of this note, and the endorsers, guarantors, sureties and other parties hereto, hereby severally waive presentment  for payment, demand, demand  for payment,  notice of nonpayment, protest, notice of protest, notice of dishonor and all pleas of division and discussion, and agree that the time of payment hereof may be extended from time to time, one or more times, without notice of such extension or extensions and without previous consent, hereby binding themselves, in solido, unconditionally and as original promissors, for the payment hereof in principal and attorney's fees.







	 	
POWIN INDUSTRIES, SA de CV


	 	 	 
	 	
BY: ROLLAND HOLDING COMPANY, LLC


	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	
BY: /s/

	
Richard A. Rolland


	 	 	
RICHARD A. ROLLAND, its duly


	 	 	
authorized Manager