##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, DC 20549
   FORM 10-Q x
    
    Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2004
 or o
    
    Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  for the transition period from            to
 Commission File Number: 000-31828   LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.  Maryland
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
Organization)
    
    06-1694835
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)909 Montgomery Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, California
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    94133
(Zip Code)
 (415) 486-2110
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code) N/A
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)   Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No
o. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x. The number of shares of our common stock outstanding on July 31, 2004
was 36,900,193.




---



INDEX PAGEPART IITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
    
    
    1ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
    
    
    21ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
    
    
    54ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
    
    
    57PART IIITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
    
    
    57ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES
    
    
    57ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
    
    
    57ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
    
    
    58ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
    
    
    58ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
    
    
    58SIGNATURES
    
    
    59EXHIBIT INDEX
    
    
    60Exhibit 3.3EXHIBIT 31.1EXHIBIT 31.2EXHIBIT 32.1EXHIBIT 32.2
  i




---



##### Table of Contents



CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking
statements. Forward looking statements are those which are not historical in
nature. They can often be identified by their inclusion of words such as
will, anticipate, estimate, should, expect, believe, intend and
similar expressions. Any projection of revenues, earnings or losses, capital
expenditures, distributions, capital structure or other financial terms is a
forward-looking statement. Our forward-looking statements are based upon our managements beliefs,
assumptions and expectations of our future operations and economic performance,
taking into account the information currently available to us. Forward-looking
statements involve risks and uncertainties, some of which are not currently
known to us, that might cause our actual results, performance or financial
condition to be materially different from the expectations of future results,
performance or financial condition we express or imply in any forward-looking
statements. Some of the important factors that could cause our actual results,
performance or financial condition to differ materially from expectations are:  
    
    our limited operating history;
    
    interest rate mismatches between our mortgage-backed securities and our borrowings used to fund
such purchases;
    
    changes in interest rates and mortgage prepayment rates;
    
    effects of interest rate caps on our adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities;
    
    the degree to which our hedging strategies may or may not protect us from interest rate volatility;
    
    potential impacts of our leveraging policies on our net income and cash available for distribution;
    
    our ability to invest up to 10% of our investment portfolio in lower-credit quality
mortgage-backed securities which carry an increased likelihood of default or rating downgrade
relative to investment-grade securities;
    
    our boards ability to change our operating policies and strategies without notice to you or
stockholder approval;
    
    Seneca Capital Management LLCs motivation to recommend riskier investments in an effort to
maximize its incentive compensation under the management agreement;
    
    potential conflicts of interest arising out of our relationship with Seneca Capital Management
LLC, on the one hand, and Seneca Capital Management LLCs relation with other third parties, on
the other hand; and
    
    the other important factors described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including those under
the captions Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, Risk Factors, and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions,
the events described by our forward-looking events might not occur. We qualify
all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary factors. In addition,
you should carefully review the risk factors described in other documents we
file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains market data, industry statistics
and other data that have been obtained from, or compiled from, information made
available by third parties. We have not independently verified their data. ii




---



##### Table of Contents



PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Condensed Financial Statements of Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc.Condensed Balance Sheets at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (unaudited)
    
    
    2Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and for
the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003 (unaudited)
    
    
    3Condensed Statement of Stockholders Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2004 (unaudited)
    
    
    4Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and for the period
from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003 (unaudited)
    
    
    5Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited)
    
    
    6
 1




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) June 30,
    
    December 31,(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
    
    2004
    
    2003Assets:Cash and cash equivalents
    
    $
    5,697
    
    
    $
    7,219Mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale, at fair value
    
    
    139,593
    
    
    
    352,123Mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale, pledged as collateral, at fair value
    
    
    4,075,021
    
    
    
    1,809,822Interest receivable
    
    
    15,883
    
    
    
    7,345Principal receivable
    
    
    14,858
    
    
    
    2,313Futures contracts, at fair value
    
    
    9,232
    
    
    
    Swap contracts, at fair value
    
    
    4,127
    
    
    
    Other assets
    
    
    1,542
    
    
    
    518Total assets
    
    $
    4,265,953
    
    
    $
    2,179,340Liabilities:Repurchase agreements
    
    $
    3,842,872
    
    
    $
    1,728,973Unsettled security purchases
    
    
    
    
    
    
    156,127Cash distribution payable
    
    
    15,867
    
    
    
    5,267Futures contracts, at fair value
    
    
    
    
    
    
    157Accrued interest expense
    
    
    7,586
    
    
    
    3,777Management fee payable, incentive fees payable and other related party liabilities
    
    
    3,079
    
    
    
    1,088Insurance note payable
    
    
    294
    
    
    
    92Accounts payable and accrued expenses
    
    
    3,015
    
    
    
    1,363Total liabilities
    
    
    3,872,713
    
    
    
    1,896,844Stockholders Equity:Preferred stock, par value $0.001:10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Common stock, par value $0.001:100,000,000 shares authorized; 36,900,193 and 24,814,000 shares issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively
    
    
    37
    
    
    
    25Additional paid-in capital
    
    
    475,905
    
    
    
    317,339Deferred compensation
    
    
    (725
    )
    
    
    Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    
    
    (73,073
    )
    
    
    (26,510
    )Accumulated distributions in excess of accumulated earnings
    
    
    (8,904
    )
    
    
    (8,358
    )Total stockholders equity
    
    
    393,240
    
    
    
    282,496Total liabilities and stockholders equity
    
    $
    4,265,953
    
    
    $
    2,179,340
 See notes to financial statements 2




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) For theFor the
    
    For the
    
    Period fromThree Months
    
    Six Months
    
    April 26, 2003Ended
    
    Ended
    
    through(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    June 30, 2003Revenues:Net interest income:Interest income
    
    $
    27,218
    
    
    $
    47,422
    
    
    $
    672Interest expense
    
    
    9,190
    
    
    
    16,017
    
    
    
    164Net interest income
    
    
    18,028
    
    
    
    31,405
    
    
    
    508Expenses:Management fee expense to related party
    
    
    1,086
    
    
    
    1,873
    
    
    
    85Incentive fee expense to related parties
    
    
    1,250
    
    
    
    2,096
    
    
    
    Salaries and benefits
    
    
    110
    
    
    
    206
    
    
    
    Professional services
    
    
    228
    
    
    
    645
    
    
    
    224Board of directors expense
    
    
    63
    
    
    
    119
    
    
    
    22Insurance expense
    
    
    137
    
    
    
    357
    
    
    
    35Custody expense
    
    
    94
    
    
    
    161
    
    
    
    3Other general and administrative expenses
    
    
    106
    
    
    
    194
    
    
    
    2Total expenses
    
    
    3,074
    
    
    
    5,651
    
    
    
    371Net income
    
    $
    14,954
    
    
    $
    25,754
    
    
    $
    137Net income per share  basic
    
    $
    0.41
    
    
    $
    0.83
    
    
    $
    0.04Net income per share  diluted
    
    $
    0.41
    
    
    $
    0.83
    
    
    $
    0.04Weighted-average number of shares outstanding  basic
    
    
    36,814,000
    
    
    
    30,945,868
    
    
    
    3,393,394Weighted-average number of shares outstanding  diluted
    
    
    36,843,531
    
    
    
    30,979,363
    
    
    
    3,393,394
 See notes to financial statements 3




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Unaudited) Common Stock
    
    Additional
    
    
    
    
    
    AccumulatedOther
    
    AccumulatedDistributions inExcess ofPaid-in
    
    Deferred
    
    Comprehensive
    
    Accumulated
    
    Comprehensive(in thousands)
    
    Shares
    
    Par Value
    
    Capital
    
    Compensation
    
    Income /(Loss)
    
    Earnings
    
    Income/(Loss)
    
    TotalBalance, December 31, 2003
    
    
    24,814
    
    
    $
    25
    
    
    $
    317,339
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    (26,510
    )
    
    $
    (8,358
    )
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    282,496Net income
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    25,754
    
    
    
    25,754
    
    
    
    25,754Mortgage-backed securities
available-for-sale, fair
value
adjustment
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (60,590
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (60,590
    )
    
    
    (60,590
    )Futures contracts, fair value
adjustment
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    9,900
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    9,900
    
    
    
    9,900Swap contracts, fair value
adjustment
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4,127
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4,127
    
    
    
    4,127Comprehensive income
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    (20,809
    )Distributions to stockholders
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (26,300
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (26,300
    )Issuance of common stock
    
    
    12,086
    
    
    
    12
    
    
    
    158,563
    
    
    
    (725
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    157,850Amortization of stock options
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    3Balance, June 30, 2004
    
    
    36,900
    
    
    $
    37
    
    
    $
    475,905
    
    
    $
    (725
    )
    
    $
    (73,073
    )
    
    $
    (8,904
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    393,240
 See notes to financial statements 4




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) For theFor the
    
    Period fromSix Months
    
    April 26, 2003Ended
    
    through(in thousands)
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    June 30, 2003Cash flows from operating activities:Net income
    
    $
    25,754
    
    
    $
    137Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:Amortization of premium/discount on mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale
    
    
    14,715
    
    
    
    186Amortization of stock options
    
    
    3
    
    
    
    Ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges
    
    
    (1,411
    )
    
    
    Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Increase in interest receivable, net of purchased interest
    
    
    (1,212
    )
    
    
    (818
    )Increase in other assets
    
    
    (1,749
    )
    
    
    (475
    )Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses
    
    
    1,652
    
    
    
    848Increase in interest payable
    
    
    3,809
    
    
    
    116Increase in management fee payable, incentive fee payable and other related party liabilities
    
    
    3,057
    
    
    
    155Net cash provided by operating activities
    
    
    44,618
    
    
    
    149Cash flows from investing activities:Purchase of mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale
    
    
    (2,789,013
    )
    
    
    (1,315,179
    )Principal payments of mortgage-backed securities
    
    
    485,042
    
    
    
    Net cash used in investing activities
    
    
    (2,303,971
    )
    
    
    (1,315,179
    )Cash flows from financing activities:Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
    
    
    157,508
    
    
    
    159,728Borrowings under repurchase agreements
    
    
    18,054,023
    
    
    
    1,150,673Principal payments on repurchase agreements
    
    
    (15,940,124
    )
    
    
    Payment of cash dividends
    
    
    (15,700
    )
    
    
    Borrowings under margin loan
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4,266Borrowings under note payable, net
    
    
    202
    
    
    
    363Realized gains on Eurodollar futures contracts
    
    
    1,922
    
    
    
    Net cash provided by financing activities
    
    
    2,257,831
    
    
    
    1,315,030Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
    
    
    (1,522
    )
    
    
    (1
    )Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
    
    
    7,219
    
    
    
    1Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
    
    $
    5,697
    
    
    $
    Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:Interest paid
    
    $
    13,255
    
    
    $
    49Non-cash investing and financing activities:Increase/(Decrease) in unsettled security purchases
    
    $
    (156,127
    )
    
    $
    407,777Increase in principal receivable
    
    
    (12,545
    )
    
    
    Incentive fees payable settled through issuance of restricted stock
    
    
    1,066
    
    
    
    Deferred compensation reclassified to stockholders equity upon issuance of restricted stock
    
    
    (725
    )
    
    
    
 See notes to financial statements 5




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) NOTE 1-ACCOUNTING POLICIES Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc., or the Company, is a real estate
investment trust which invests primarily in U.S. agency and other highly-rated
single-family, adjustable-rate, hybrid adjustable-rate and fixed rate
mortgage-backed securities. Seneca Capital Management LLC, or the Manager,
pursuant to a management agreement, or the Management Agreement, manages the
Company and its investment portfolio. The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or
GAAP. Preparing the financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and income
and expenses during the reporting period. The information furnished in these unaudited condensed interim statements
reflects all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for
a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. These adjustments
are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise disclosed in this Form 10-Q.
The results of operations in the interim statements do not necessarily indicate
the results that may be expected for the full year. The interim financial
information should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2003 Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 3, 2004
(file number 001-31828). Descriptions of the significant accounting policies of the Company are
included in Note 1 to financial statements in the Companys 2003 Annual Report
on Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes to these policies during
2004. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, reached a
consensus on Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and
Its Application to Certain Investments. This Issue provides clarification with
respect to the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application
to investments classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,(including individual
securities and investments in mutual funds), and investments accounted for
under the cost method or the equity method. The guidance for evaluating whether
an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired must be applied in
other-than-temporary impairment evaluations made in reporting periods beginning
after June 15, 2004. This Issue did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements. 6




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) NOTE 2-MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES The following table summarizes the Companys mortgage-backed securities
classified as available-for-sale at June 30, 2004, which are carried at fair
value: Hybrid
    
    Balloon
    
    TotalAdjustable-
    
    Adjustable- Rate
    
    Maturity
    
    Mortgage-Rate Securities
    
    Securities
    
    Securities
    
    Backed Securities(in thousands)Amortized cost
    
    $
    152,475
    
    
    $
    4,093,666
    
    
    $
    55,415
    
    
    $
    4,301,556Unrealized gains
    
    
    39
    
    
    
    237
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    276Unrealized losses
    
    
    (4,046
    )
    
    
    (81,465
    )
    
    
    (1,707
    )
    
    
    (87,218
    )Fair value
    
    $
    148,468
    
    
    $
    4,012,438
    
    
    $
    53,708
    
    
    $
    4,214,614% of total
    
    
    3.5
    %
    
    
    95.2
    %
    
    
    1.3
    %
    
    
    100.0
    %
 The following table summarizes the Companys mortgage-backed securities
classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2003, which are carried at
fair value: Hybrid
    
    Balloon
    
    TotalAdjustable-
    
    Adjustable- Rate
    
    Maturity
    
    Mortgage-Rate Securities
    
    Securities
    
    Securities
    
    Backed Securities(in thousands)Amortized cost
    
    $
    187,769
    
    
    $
    1,944,707
    
    
    $
    55,822
    
    
    $
    2,188,298Unrealized gains
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    1,061
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,068Unrealized losses
    
    
    (2,463
    )
    
    
    (23,828
    )
    
    
    (1,130
    )
    
    
    (27,421
    )Fair value
    
    $
    185,313
    
    
    $
    1,921,940
    
    
    $
    54,692
    
    
    $
    2,161,945% of total
    
    
    8.6
    %
    
    
    88.9
    %
    
    
    2.5
    %
    
    
    100.0
    %
 At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, 63.9% and 63.0%, respectively, of
the Companys mortgage-backed securities portfolio, as measured by its fair
value, was agency-guaranteed. Actual maturities of mortgage-backed securities are generally shorter than
stated contractual maturities. Actual maturities of the Companys
mortgage-backed securities are affected by the contractual lives of the
underlying mortgages, periodic payments of principal, and prepayments of
principal. The following table summarizes the Companys mortgage-backed
securities on June 30, 2004 according to their estimated weighted-average life
classifications: Weighted-AverageWeighted-Average Life
    
    Fair Value
    
    Amortized Cost
    
    Coupon(in thousands)Less than one year
    
    $
    210,421
    
    
    $
    213,936
    
    
    
    3.98
    %Greater than one year and less than five years
    
    
    3,922,621
    
    
    
    4,002,959
    
    
    
    4.06
    %Greater than five years
    
    
    81,572
    
    
    
    84,661
    
    
    
    3.50
    %Total
    
    $
    4,214,614
    
    
    $
    4,301,556
    
    
    
    4.05
    %
 7




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) The following table summarizes the Companys mortgage-backed securities on
December 31, 2003 according to their estimated weighted-average life
classifications: Weighted-AverageWeighted-Average Life
    
    Fair Value
    
    Amortized Cost
    
    Coupon(in thousands)Less than one year
    
    $
    299,685
    
    
    $
    304,556
    
    
    
    4.07
    %Greater than one year and less than five years
    
    
    1,829,471
    
    
    
    1,850,899
    
    
    
    4.09
    %Greater than five years
    
    
    32,789
    
    
    
    32,843
    
    
    
    3.96
    %Total
    
    $
    2,161,945
    
    
    $
    2,188,298
    
    
    
    4.09
    %
 The weighted-average lives of the mortgage-backed securities at June 30,
2004 and December 31, 2003 in the tables above are based upon data provided
through subscription-based financial information services, assuming constant
principal prepayment rates to the balloon or reset date for each security. The
prepayment model considers current yield, forward yield, steepness of the yield
curve, current mortgage rates, mortgage rate of the outstanding loan, loan age,
margin and volatility. The actual weighted-average lives of the mortgage-backed securities in the
Companys investment portfolio could be longer or shorter than the estimates in
the table above depending on the actual prepayment rates experienced over the
lives of the applicable securities and are sensitive to changes in both
prepayment rates and interest rates. The following table shows the Companys investments fair value and gross
unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at
June 30, 2004: Less than 12 Months
    
    12 Months or More
    
    TotalGross
    
    
    
    
    
    Gross
    
    
    
    
    
    GrossFair
    
    Unrealized
    
    Fair
    
    Unrealized
    
    Fair
    
    UnrealizedValue
    
    Losses
    
    Value
    
    Losses
    
    Value
    
    Losses(in thousands)Agency-backedMortgage-backed securities
    
    $
    2,112,256
    
    
    $
    (47,896
    )
    
    $
    450,055
    
    
    $
    (12,307
    )
    
    $
    2,562,311
    
    
    $
    (60,203
    )Non-agency-backedMortgage-backed securities
    
    
    1,282,324
    
    
    
    (20,349
    )
    
    
    237,198
    
    
    
    (6,666
    )
    
    
    1,519,522
    
    
    
    (27,015
    )Total temporarily impaired
securities
    
    $
    3,394,580
    
    
    $
    (68,245
    )
    
    $
    687,253
    
    
    $
    (18,973
    )
    
    $
    4,081,833
    
    
    $
    (87,218
    )
 8




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) The following table shows the Companys investments fair value and gross
unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at
December 31, 2003: Less than 12 Months
    
    12 Months or More
    
    TotalGross
    
    
    
    
    
    Gross
    
    
    
    
    
    GrossFair
    
    Unrealized
    
    Fair
    
    Unrealized
    
    Fair
    
    UnrealizedValue
    
    Losses
    
    Value
    
    Losses
    
    Value
    
    Losses(in thousands)Agency-backedMortgage-backed securities
    
    $
    1,109,858
    
    
    $
    (17,261
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    1,109,858
    
    
    $
    (17,261
    )Non-agency-backedMortgage-backed securities
    
    
    644,448
    
    
    
    (10,160
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    644,448
    
    
    
    (10,160
    )Total temporarily impaired
securities
    
    $
    1,754,306
    
    
    $
    (27,421
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    1,754,306
    
    
    $
    (27,421
    )
 At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 the Company was only invested in
AAA-rated non-agency-backed or agency-backed mortgage-backed securities. The
temporary impairment of the available-for-sale securities results from the fair
value of the securities falling below the amortized cost basis. At June 30,
2004 and December 31, 2003, none of the securities held by the Company had been
downgraded by a credit rating agency since their purchase. Management intends
to hold the securities until maturity, allowing for the anticipated recovery in
fair value of the securities held. As such, management does not believe any of
the securities held are other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2004 or
December 31, 2003. NOTE 3-REPURCHASE AGREEMENTS AND OTHER BORROWINGS The Company has entered into repurchase agreements with third party
financial institutions to finance most of its mortgage-backed securities. The
repurchase agreements are short-term borrowings that bear interest rates that
have historically moved in close relationship to the three-month London
Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the
Company had repurchase agreements with an outstanding balance of $3.8 billion
and $1.7 billion, respectively, and with weighted-average interest rates of
1.31% and 1.19%, respectively. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
securities pledged as collateral for repurchase agreements had estimated fair
values of $4.1 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively. 9




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) At June 30, 2004, the repurchase agreements had remaining maturities as
summarized below: Overnight
    
    Between
    
    Between
    
    Between(1 day or
    
    2 and 30
    
    31 and 90
    
    91 and 786less)
    
    days
    
    days
    
    days
    
    Total(in thousands)Agency-backed mortgage-backed securities:Amortized cost of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    $
    22,268
    
    
    $
    369,444
    
    
    $
    1,896,609
    
    
    $
    430,364
    
    
    $
    2,718,685Fair market value of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    
    21,652
    
    
    
    362,590
    
    
    
    1,855,234
    
    
    
    420,284
    
    
    
    2,659,760Repurchase agreement liabilities
associated with these securities
    
    
    19,793
    
    
    
    238,247
    
    
    
    1,856,487
    
    
    
    396,155
    
    
    
    2,510,682Average interest rate of repurchase
agreement liabilities
    
    
    1.15
    %
    
    
    1.14
    %
    
    
    1.33
    %
    
    
    1.12
    %
    
    
    1.28
    %Non-agency-backed mortgage-backed
securities:Amortized cost of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    $
    17
    
    
    $
    71,711
    
    
    $
    328,197
    
    
    $
    1,056,990
    
    
    $
    1,456,915Fair market value of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    
    17
    
    
    
    70,506
    
    
    
    322,365
    
    
    
    1,037,734
    
    
    
    1,430,622Repurchase agreement liabilities
associated with these securities
    
    
    16
    
    
    
    64,404
    
    
    
    297,711
    
    
    
    970,059
    
    
    
    1,332,190Average interest rate of repurchase
agreement liabilities
    
    
    1.15
    %
    
    
    1.15
    %
    
    
    1.40
    %
    
    
    1.37
    %
    
    
    1.36
    %Total:Amortized cost of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    $
    22,285
    
    
    $
    441,155
    
    
    $
    2,224,806
    
    
    $
    1,487,354
    
    
    $
    4,175,600Fair market value of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    
    21,669
    
    
    
    433,096
    
    
    
    2,177,599
    
    
    
    1,458,018
    
    
    
    4,090,382Repurchase agreement liabilities
associated with these securities
    
    
    19,809
    
    
    
    302,651
    
    
    
    2,154,198
    
    
    
    1,366,214
    
    
    
    3,842,872Average interest rate of repurchase
agreement liabilities
    
    
    1.15
    %
    
    
    1.14
    %
    
    
    1.34
    %
    
    
    1.30
    %
    
    
    1.31
    %
 10




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) At December 31, 2003, the repurchase agreements had remaining maturities
as summarized below: Overnight
    
    Between
    
    Between
    
    Between 91(1 day or
    
    2 and 30
    
    31 and 90
    
    and 238less)
    
    days
    
    days
    
    days
    
    Total(in thousands)Agency-backed mortgage-backed securities:Amortized cost of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    14,299
    
    
    $
    302,538
    
    
    $
    1,010,586
    
    
    $
    1,327,423Fair market value of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    
    
    
    
    
    14,065
    
    
    
    302,272
    
    
    
    994,545
    
    
    
    1,310,882Repurchase agreement liabilities
associated with these securities
    
    
    
    
    
    
    12,865
    
    
    
    281,870
    
    
    
    952,532
    
    
    
    1,247,267Average interest rate of repurchase
agreement liabilities
    
    
    0.00
    %
    
    
    1.20
    %
    
    
    1.11
    %
    
    
    1.19
    %
    
    
    1.17
    %Non-agency-backed mortgage-backed
securities:Amortized cost of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    $
    18,475
    
    
    $
    329,592
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    165,608
    
    
    $
    513,675Fair market value of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    
    18,431
    
    
    
    324,769
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    161,881
    
    
    
    505,081Repurchase agreement liabilities
associated with these securities
    
    
    17,490
    
    
    
    306,911
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    157,305
    
    
    
    481,706Average interest rate of repurchase
agreement liabilities
    
    
    1.20
    %
    
    
    1.21
    %
    
    
    0.00
    %
    
    
    1.29
    %
    
    
    1.23
    %Total:Amortized cost of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    $
    18,475
    
    
    $
    343,891
    
    
    $
    302,538
    
    
    $
    1,176,194
    
    
    $
    1,841,098Fair market value of securities sold,
including accrued interest
    
    
    18,431
    
    
    
    338,834
    
    
    
    302,272
    
    
    
    1,156,426
    
    
    
    1,815,963Repurchase agreement liabilities
associated with these securities
    
    
    17,490
    
    
    
    319,776
    
    
    
    281,870
    
    
    
    1,109,837
    
    
    
    1,728,973Average interest rate of repurchase
agreement liabilities
    
    
    1.20
    %
    
    
    1.21
    %
    
    
    1.11
    %
    
    
    1.20
    %
    
    
    1.19
    %
 11




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) At June 30, 2004, the repurchase agreements had the following
counterparties, amounts at risk and weighted-average remaining maturities: Weighted-AverageMaturity ofAmount at
    
    RepurchaseRepurchase Agreement Counterparties
    
    Risk(1)
    
    Agreements(in thousands)
    
    (in days)Banc of America Securities LLC
    
    $
    15,787
    
    
    
    245Bear Stearns & Co.
    
    
    24,992
    
    
    
    61Countrywide Securities Corporation
    
    
    3,658
    
    
    
    318Credit Suisse First Boston LLC
    
    
    32,100
    
    
    
    46Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
    
    
    11,804
    
    
    
    318Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
    
    
    17,385
    
    
    
    65Goldman Sachs & Co.
    
    
    3,038
    
    
    
    58Lehman Brothers Inc.
    
    
    3,952
    
    
    
    63Liquid Funding, Ltd.
    
    
    16,672
    
    
    
    336Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc./Merrill Lynch
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
    
    
    11,472
    
    
    
    46Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.
    
    
    1,330
    
    
    
    63Salomon Smith Barney
    
    
    66,418
    
    
    
    144UBS Securities LLC
    
    
    19,692
    
    
    
    353Wachovia Securities, LLC
    
    
    11,624
    
    
    
    69Total
    
    $
    239,924
    
    
    
    169
  (1)
    
    Equal to the sum of fair value of securities sold plus accrued
interest income minus the sum of repurchase agreement liabilities
plus accrued interest expense. At December 31, 2003, the repurchase agreements had the following
counterparties, amounts at risk and weighted-average remaining maturities: Weighted-AverageMaturity ofAmount at
    
    RepurchaseRepurchase Agreement Counterparties
    
    Risk(1)
    
    Agreements(in thousands)
    
    (in days)Bear Stearns & Co.
    
    $
    8,423
    
    
    
    138Banc of America Securities LLC
    
    
    9,762
    
    
    
    26Countrywide Securities Corporation
    
    
    2,358
    
    
    
    23Credit Suisse First Boston LLC
    
    
    14,350
    
    
    
    130Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
    
    
    2,350
    
    
    
    146Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
    
    
    (279
    )
    
    
    61Goldman Sachs & Co.
    
    
    (390
    )
    
    
    58J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
    
    
    1,649
    
    
    
    177Merrill Lynch Government Securities Inc./Merrill Lynch
Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
    
    
    6,352
    
    
    
    189Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc.
    
    
    972
    
    
    
    61Salomon Smith Barney
    
    
    20,287
    
    
    
    163UBS Securities LLC
    
    
    17,379
    
    
    
    189Total
    
    $
    83,213
    
    
    
    145
  (1)
    
    Equal to the sum of fair value of securities sold plus accrued interest income
minus the sum of repurchase agreement liabilities plus accrued interest
expense. 12




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) The Company had a note payable of $294 thousand and $92 thousand at June
30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, for the purpose of financing its
annual directors and officers insurance premium at the annual interest rate
of 4.91% and 6.50%, respectively. The Company has a margin lending facility with its primary custodian
whereby it may borrow money in connection with the purchase or sale of
securities. The terms of the borrowings, including the rate of interest
payable, will be agreed to with the custodian for each amount borrowed.
Borrowings are repayable immediately upon demand by the custodian. At June 30,
2004 and December 31, 2003, there were no outstanding borrowings under the
margin lending facility. NOTE 4CAPITAL STOCK AND NET INCOME PER SHARE The Company had 100,000,000 shares of par value $0.001 common stock
authorized and 36,900,193 shares and 24,814,000 shares were issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Of the
100,000,000 shares of par value $0.001 common stock authorized, 10,000,000
shares are reserved for issuance in order to pay incentive fees in connection
with the Management Agreement. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
9,918,500 shares and 9,974,349 shares, respectively, remain reserved for
issuance. The Company had 10,000,000 shares of par value $0.001 preferred stock
authorized and none outstanding at June 30, 2004 or December 31, 2003. On March 29, 2004, the Company completed a public offering of 12,000,000
shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value, at an offering price of $14.00
per share. The Company received proceeds from the public offering in the amount
of $157.5 million, net of underwriting discount and other offering costs. The Company calculates basic net income per share by dividing net income
for the period by the weighted-average shares of its common stock outstanding
for that period. Diluted net income per share takes into account the effect of
dilutive instruments, such as stock options and unvested restricted stock, but
uses the average share price for the period in determining the number of
incremental shares that are to be added to the weighted-average number of
shares outstanding. The following table presents a reconciliation of basic and diluted net
income per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004: For the Three Months
    
    For the Six MonthsEnded June 30, 2004
    
    Ended June 30, 2004Basic
    
    Diluted
    
    Basic
    
    DilutedNet income (in thousands)
    
    $
    14,954
    
    
    $
    14,954
    
    
    $
    25,754
    
    
    $
    25,754Weighted-average number
of common shares
outstanding
    
    
    36,814,000
    
    
    
    36,814,000
    
    
    
    30,945,868
    
    
    
    30,945,868Additional shares due to
assumed conversion of
dilutive instruments
    
    
    
    
    
    
    29,531
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    33,495Adjusted
weighted-average number
of common shares
outstanding
    
    
    36,814,000
    
    
    
    36,843,531
    
    
    
    30,945,868
    
    
    
    30,979,363Net income per share
    
    $
    0.41
    
    
    $
    0.41
    
    
    $
    0.83
    
    
    $
    0.83
 For the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003, basic net income
per share was $0.04. The Company had no dilutive instruments and therefore
diluted net income per share was equal to basic net income per share. 13




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) NOTE 52003 STOCK INCENTIVE PLANS The Company adopted a 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 4, 2003,
and a 2003 Outside Advisors Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 4, 2003,
pursuant to which up to 1,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock is
authorized to be awarded at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors. The plans provide for the grant of a variety of long-term
incentive awards to employees and officers of the Company, individual
consultants or advisors who render or have rendered bona fide services, and to
officers, employees or directors of the Manager as an additional means to
attract, motivate, retain and reward eligible persons. These plans provide for
the grant of awards that meet the requirements of Section 422 of the Internal
Revenue Code, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights,
restricted stock, stock units and other stock-based awards, and dividend
equivalent rights. The maximum term of each grant is determined on the grant
date by the Compensation Committee and shall not exceed 10 years. The exercise
price and the vesting requirement of each grant is determined on the grant date
by the Compensation Committee. The following table sets forth the common stock available for grant
at June 30, 2004: 2003 Outside2003 Stock
    
    Advisors StockIncentive Plan
    
    Incentive Plan
    
    TotalShares reserved for issuance
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,000,000
    (1)Granted
    
    
    59,693
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    59,693Forfeited
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Expired
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total available for grant
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    940,307
    (2)
  (1)
    
    At June 4, 2003, adoption date of both stock incentive plans, the maximum number of shares of common stock that may
be issued pursuant to awards granted under these combined plans is 1,000,000 shares.(2)
    
    At June 30, 2004, the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be issued pursuant to awards granted
under these combined plans is 940,307 shares. At June 30, 2004, the Company had outstanding options under the plans with
expiration dates of 2013. The following table summarizes all stock option
transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2004: Weighted-Number of
    
    AverageOptions
    
    Exercise PriceOutstanding at December 31, 2003
    
    
    55,000
    
    
    $
    14.82Granted
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Exercised
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Forfeited
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Outstanding at June 30, 2004
    
    
    55,000
    
    
    $
    14.82
 14




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) The following table summarizes certain information about stock options
outstanding at June 30, 2004: Outstanding
    
    ExercisableWeighted-Average
    
    Weighted-
    
    
    
    
    
    Weighted-Number
    
    Remaining
    
    Average
    
    Number
    
    AverageRange of
    
    of
    
    Life (in
    
    Exercise
    
    of
    
    ExerciseExercise Prices
    
    Options
    
    years)
    
    Price
    
    Options
    
    Price$13.00-$14.00
    
    
    5,000
    
    
    
    9.3
    
    
    $
    13.00
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $14.01-$15.00
    
    
    50,000
    
    
    
    9.1
    
    
    $
    15.00
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $13.00-$15.00
    
    
    55,000
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
 Total stock-based employee compensation expense related to stock options
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was $2 thousand and $3
thousand, respectively. The following table illustrates restricted common stock transactions
during the six months ended June 30, 2004: Number of
    
    Weighted-Restricted
    
    Average IssueCommon Shares
    
    PriceOutstanding at December 31, 2003
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Issued
    
    
    4,693
    
    
    $
    13.79Repurchased
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Outstanding at June 30, 2004
    
    
    4,693
    
    
    $
    13.79
 There were no stock option or restricted common stock transactions during
the period from June 4, 2003, the effective date of the 2003 Stock Incentive
Plan and the 2003 Outside Advisors Stock Incentive Plan, through June 30, 2003. NOTE 6THE MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT The Company has entered into a Management Agreement with the Manager that
provides, among other things, that the Company will pay to the Manager, in
exchange for investment management and certain administrative services, certain
fees and reimbursements, summarized as follows:  
    
    a base management fee equal to a percentage of average net worth
during each fiscal year as defined in the Management Agreement (1% of
the first $300 million plus 0.8% of the amount in excess of $300
million);  
    
    incentive compensation based on the excess of a tiered percentage
(as defined in the Management Agreement as the weighted-average of the
following rates based upon average net invested assets: (1) 20% for
the first $400 million of average net invested assets; and (2) 10% for
the average net invested assets in excess of $400 million) of the
difference between the Companys net income (defined in the Management
Agreement as taxable income before incentive compensation, net
operating losses from prior periods, and items permitted by the
Internal Revenue Code when calculating taxable income for a REIT) and
the threshold return (the amount of net income for the period that
would produce an annualized return on equity, calculated by dividing
the net income, as defined in the Management Agreement, by the average
net invested assets, as defined in the Management Agreement, equal to
the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate for the period plus 2.0%) for the
fiscal period; and  
    
    out-of-pocket expenses and certain other costs incurred by the Manager
and related directly to the Company. 15




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) The base management fee and incentive compensation will be paid quarterly
and are subject to adjustment at the end of each fiscal year based on annual
results. One-half of the incentive compensation will be paid to the Manager in
cash and one-half will be paid in the form of a restricted stock award. The
number of shares issued is based on (a) one-half of the total incentive
compensation for the period, divided by (b) the average of the closing prices
of the common stock over the 30-day period ending three calendar days prior to
the grant date, less a fair market value discount determined by the Companys
Board of Directors. These shares are restricted shares for varying periods of
time, and are forfeitable if the Manager ceases to perform management services
for the Company before the end of the restriction periods. The Companys
restrictions lapse and full rights of ownership vest for one-third of the
shares on the first anniversary of the end of the period in which the incentive
compensation is calculated, for one-third of the shares on the second
anniversary and for the last one-third of the shares on the third anniversary.
Vesting is predicated on the continuing involvement of the Manager in providing
services to the Company. From and after June 11, 2004, the Company is entitled to terminate the
Management Agreement without cause provided that the Company gives the Manager
at least 60 days prior written notice and pays a termination fee and other
unpaid costs and expenses reimbursable to the Manager. If the Companys
terminates the Management Agreement without cause, the Company is required to
pay the Manager a termination fee as follows:  
    
    If the Company terminates the Management Agreement without cause in
connection with a decision to manage its portfolio internally, rather
than by an external manager, the amount of the termination fee shall
be equal to the amount of the highest annual base fee and the highest
annual incentive compensation, for a particular year, earned by the
Manager during any of the three years (or on an annualized basis if a
lesser period) preceding the effective date of the termination, plus
accelerated vesting on the equity component of all incentive
compensation.  
    
    If the Company terminates the Management Agreement without cause for
any other reason, the amount of the termination fee shall be equal to
two times the amount of the highest annual base fee and the highest
annual incentive compensation, for a particular year, earned by the
Manager during any of the three years (or on an annualized basis if a
lesser period) preceding the effective date of the termination, plus
all deferred payments, including accelerated vesting on the equity
component of all incentive compensation. The Company is also entitled to terminate the Management Agreement with
cause, in which case the Company is only obligated to reimburse the Manager for
its unpaid costs and expenses. The Management Agreement contains certain provisions requiring the Company
to indemnify the Manager for costs (e.g., legal costs) the Manager could
potentially incur in fulfilling its duties prescribed in the Management
Agreement or in other agreements related to the Companys activities. The
indemnification provisions do not apply under all circumstances (e.g., if the
Manager is grossly negligent, acted with reckless disregard or engaged in
willful misconduct or active fraud). The provisions contain no limitation on
maximum future payments. The Company has evaluated the impact of these
guarantees on its financial statements and determined that it is immaterial. The base management fee for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004
was $1.1 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The base management fee for
the period from April 26, 2003 to June 30, 2003 was $85 thousand. For the three months ended June 30, 2004, REIT taxable income (before
deducting incentive compensation, net operating losses and certain other items)
was $17.0 million and was greater than the threshold return taxable income of
$7.7 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, REIT taxable income
(before deducting incentive compensation, net operating losses and certain
other items) was $28.2 million and was greater than the threshold return
taxable income of $12.4 million. 16




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) For the three months ended June 30, 2004, total incentive fees earned by
the Manager were $1.8 million, one-half payable in cash and one-half payable in
the form of the Companys common stock. The cash portion of the incentive fee
of $923 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was expensed in that
period. In accordance with SFAS No. 123, and related interpretations, and EITF
96-18, 15.2% of the restricted stock portion of the incentive fees, or $141
thousand, was expensed in the three months ended June 30, 2004. Included in
other assets at June 30, 2004 is $783 thousand of deferred compensation which
will be reclassified to stockholders equity after the restricted stock is
issued and will be expensed over the three-year vesting period of the
restricted stock. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, total incentive fees earned by the
Manager were $3.1 million, one-half payable in cash and one-half payable in the
form of the Companys common stock. The cash portion of the incentive fee of
$1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was expensed in that
period. In accordance with SFAS No. 123, and related interpretations, and EITF
96-18, 15.2% of the restricted stock portion of the incentive fees, or $240
thousand, was expensed in the six months ended June 30, 2004. For the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003, REIT taxable net
income (before deducting incentive compensation, net operating losses and
certain other items) was $298 thousand and was less than the threshold return
net income of $426 thousand and, therefore, no incentive fee was earned by the
Manager or paid by the Company for that period In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, the Companys
Chief Financial Officer earned an incentive fee of $92 thousand for the three
months ended June 30, 2004. This incentive fee is also payable one-half in cash
and one-half in the form of a restricted stock award under the Companys 2003
Stock Incentive Plan. The shares are payable and vest over the same vesting
schedule as the stock issued to the Manager. The cash portion of the incentive
fee of $46 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was expensed in
that period. In accordance with SFAS No. 123, and related interpretations, and
EITF 96-18, 15.2% of the restricted stock portion of the incentive fees, or $7
thousand, was expensed in the three months ended June 30, 2004. Included in
other assets at June 30, 2004 is $39 thousand of deferred compensation which
will be reclassified to stockholders equity after the restricted stock is
issued and will be expensed over the three-year vesting period of the
restricted stock. The Companys Chief Financial Officer earned an incentive fee of $157
thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This incentive fee is payable
one-half in cash and one-half in the form of a restricted stock award under the
Companys 2003 Stock Incentive Plan. The shares are payable and vest over the
same vesting schedule as the stock issued to the Manager. The cash portion of
the incentive fee of $79 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was
expensed in that period. In accordance with SFAS No. 123, and related
interpretations, and EITF 96-18, 15.2% of the restricted stock portion of the
incentive fees, or $12 thousand, was expensed in the six months ended June 30,
2004. The Chief Financial Officer began employment on August 4, 2003. As such,
no incentive compensation was earned by or paid to the Chief Financial Officer
for the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003. NOTE 7RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company was indebted to the
Manager for base management fees of $1.1 million and $418 thousand,
respectively, and incentive fees of $1.8 million and $606 thousand,
respectively. At December 31, 2003 the Company was indebted to the Manager for
reimbursement of expenses of $16 thousand. At June 30, 2004 and December 31,
2003, the Company was indebted to the Companys Chief Financial Officer for
incentive fees of $124 thousand and $30 thousand, respectively, and to officers
and employees of the Company for bonuses and expense reimbursement of $13
thousand and $18 thousand, respectively. These amounts are included in
management fee payable, incentive fees payable and other related party
liabilities. 17




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) The Managers financial relationship with the Company is governed by the
Management Agreement. Under the Management Agreement, the Manager shall be
responsible for all expenses of the personnel employed by the Manager, and all
facilities and overhead expenses of the Manager required for the day-to-day
operations of the Company, and the expenses of a sub-manager, if any. The
Company shall reimburse the Manager for its pro-rata portion of facilities and
overhead expenses to the extent that the Companys employees (who are not also
employed by the Manager) use such facilities or incur such expenses pursuant to
a cost-sharing agreement entered into between the Company and the Manager. At
June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, there were no expenses payable to the
Manager pursuant to the cost-sharing agreement. During the three and six
months ended June 30, 2004, the Company paid the Manager $6 thousand and $12
thousand pursuant to the cost-sharing agreement, respectively. For the period
from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003, there were no costs incurred
pursuant to the cost-sharing agreement. The Company shall pay all other
expenses on behalf of the Company, and shall reimburse the Manager for all
direct expenses incurred on the Companys behalf that are not the Managers
specific responsibility as defined in the Management Agreement. NOTE 8FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS SFAS No. 107, Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments for which it is
practicable to estimate that value. The fair value of mortgage-backed
securities available-for-sale and futures contracts is equal to their carrying
value presented in the balance sheet. The fair value of cash and cash
equivalents, interest receivable, repurchase agreements, unsettled security
purchases, and accrued interest expense, approximates cost at June 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003, due to the short-term nature of these instruments. NOTE 9ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS The following is a summary of the components of accumulated other
comprehensive loss at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003: June 30,
    
    December 31,2004
    
    2003(in thousands)Net unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities available-for-sale
    
    $
    (86,942
    )
    
    $
    (26,353
    )Net deferred realized and unrealized gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges
    
    
    13,869
    
    
    
    (157
    )Accumulated other comprehensive loss
    
    $
    (73,073
    )
    
    $
    (26,510
    )
 See Note 10 for further discussion regarding derivative instruments and
hedging activities. NOTE 10DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES The Company seeks to manage its interest rate risk exposure and protect
the Companys repurchase agreement liabilities against the effects of major
interest rate changes upon their repricing/maturity. Among other strategies,
the Company may use Eurodollar futures contracts and interest rate swaps to
manage this interest rate risk. Derivative instruments are carried at fair
value. 18




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) The following table is a summary of derivative instruments held at June
30, 2004: Unrealized
    
    Unrealized
    
    EstimatedGains
    
    Losses
    
    Fair Value(in thousands)Eurodollar futures contracts sold short
    
    $
    10,398
    
    
    $
    (1,166
    )
    
    $
    9,232Interest rate swap contracts
    
    
    4,127
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    4,127Total derivative instruments
    
    $
    14,525
    
    
    $
    (1,166
    )
    
    $
    13,359
 The following table is a summary of derivative instruments held at
December 31, 2003: Unrealized
    
    Unrealized
    
    EstimatedGains
    
    Losses
    
    Fair Value(in thousands)Eurodollar futures contracts sold short
    
    $
    3
    
    
    $
    (160
    )
    
    $
    (157
    )
 Cash Flow Hedging Strategies Hedging instruments are designated as cash flow hedges, as appropriate,
based upon the specifically identified exposure. The hedged transaction is the
forecasted interest expense on forecasted rollover/reissuance of repurchase
agreements or the interest rate repricing of repurchase agreements for a
specified future time period. The hedged risk is the variability in those
payments due to changes in the benchmark rate. Hedging transactions are
structured at inception so that the notional amounts of the hedge are matched
with an equal amount of repurchase agreements forecasted to be outstanding in
that specified period for which the borrowing rate is not yet fixed. Cash flow
hedging strategies include the utilization of Eurodollar futures contracts and
interest rate swap contracts. Hedging instruments under these strategies are
deemed to be broadly designated to the outstanding repurchase portfolio and the
forecasted rollover thereof. Such forecasted rollovers would also include other
types of borrowing arrangements that may replace the repurchase funding during
the identified hedge time periods. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the
maximum length of time over which the Company is hedging its exposure was 15
months and 12 months, respectively. Prior to the end of the specified hedge time period, the effective portion
of all contract gains and losses (whether realized or unrealized) is recorded
in other comprehensive income or loss. Realized gains and losses are
reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense during the
specified hedge time period. The Company may use Eurodollar futures contracts to hedge the forecasted
interest expense associated with the benchmark rate on forecasted
rollover/reissuance of repurchase agreements or the interest rate repricing of
repurchase agreements for a specified future time period, which is defined as
the calendar quarter immediately following the contract expiration date. Gains
and losses on each contract are associated with forecasted interest expense for
the specified future period. The Company may use interest rate swap contracts to hedge the forecasted
interest expense associated with the benchmark rate on forecasted
rollover/reissuance of repurchase agreements or the interest rate repricing of
repurchase agreements for the period defined by maturity of the interest rate
swap. Cash flows that occur each time the swap is repriced will be associated
with forecasted interest expense for a specified future period, which is
defined as the calendar period preceding each repricing date with the same
number of months as the repricing frequency. 19




---



##### Table of Contents



LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Continued) (Unaudited) The hedge instrument must be highly effective in achieving offsetting
changes in the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged in order to
qualify for hedge accounting. In order to determine whether the hedge
instrument is highly effective, the Company uses regression methodology to
assess the effectiveness of its hedging strategies. Specifically, at the
inception of each new hedge and on an ongoing basis, the Company assesses
effectiveness using ordinary least squares regression to evaluate the
correlation between the rates consistent with the hedge instrument and the
underlying hedged items. A hedge instrument is highly effective if the changes
in the fair value of the derivative provide offset of at least 80% and not more
than 120% of the changes in fair value or cash flows of the hedged item
attributable to the risk being hedged. The futures and interest rate swap
contracts are carried on the balance sheet at fair value. Any ineffectiveness
which arises during the hedging relationship is recognized in interest expense
during the period in which it arises. During both the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, gains of $2.0
million were recognized in interest expense due to hedge ineffectiveness.
During both the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, interest expense was
increased by $412 thousand of amortization of realized losses on futures
contracts and by $511 thousand paid to swap contract counterparties. Based upon
the combined amounts of $1.9 million of net deferred realized gains and $7.8
million of net unrealized gains from Eurodollar futures contracts included in
accumulated other comprehensive income and loss at June 30, 2004, the Company
expects to recognize lower interest expense during the remainder of 2004 and
part of 2005. This amount could differ from amounts actually realized due to
changes in the benchmark rate between June 30, 2004 and when the Eurodollar
futures contracts sold short at June 30, 2004 are covered, as well as the
addition of other hedges subsequent to June 30, 2004. The Company was not engaged in derivative instruments and hedging
activities during the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003. 20




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following discussion of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and
notes to those statements included elsewhere in this document. This discussion
may contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
The words believe, expect, anticipate, estimate, may, will, or
could and similar expressions or the negatives of these words or phrases are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. As a result of many factors,
such as those set forth under Risk Factors and elsewhere in this document,
our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such
forward-looking statements. General Luminent Mortgage Capital, Inc. is a REIT headquartered in San Francisco,
California. We were incorporated in April 2003 to invest primarily in U.S.
agency and other highly-rated, single-family, adjustable-rate, hybrid
adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities, which we acquire in
the secondary market. Substantive operations began in mid-June 2003, after
completing a private placement of our common stock. Our strategy is to acquire
mortgage-related assets, finance these purchases in the capital markets and use
leverage in order to provide an attractive return on stockholders equity.
Through this strategy, we seek to earn income, which is generated from the
spread between the yield on our earning assets and our costs, including the
interest cost of the funds we borrow. We have acquired and will seek to acquire
additional assets that will produce competitive returns, taking into
consideration the amount and nature of the anticipated returns from the
investment, our ability to pledge the investment for secured, collateralized
borrowings and the costs associated with financing, managing, securitizing and
reserving for these investments. Our business is affected by a variety of economic and industry factors.
The most significant risk factors management considers while managing the
business which could have a material adverse effect on the financial condition
and results of operations are:  
    
    interest rate mismatches between our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed
securities and our borrowings used to fund our purchases of mortgage-backed securities;  
    
    increasing or decreasing levels of prepayments on the mortgages underlying our mortgage-backed
securities;  
    
    the potential for increased borrowing costs related to repurchase agreements;  
    
    interest rate caps related to our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities;  
    
    the overall leverage of our portfolio;  
    
    our ability or inability to use derivatives to mitigate our interest rate and prepayment risks;  
    
    the impact that increases in interest rates would have on our book value;  
    
    maintaining adequate borrowing capacity so that we can purchase mortgage-related assets and reach our
desired amount of leverage;  
    
    if we fail to obtain or renew sufficient funding on favorable terms or at all, we will be limited in
our ability to acquire mortgage-related assets;  
    
    possible market developments could cause our lenders to require us to pledge additional assets as
collateral; 21




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    if our assets are insufficient to meet the collateral requirements, we might be compelled to liquidate
particular assets at inopportune times and at disadvantageous prices;  
    
    competition might prevent us from acquiring mortgage-backed securities at favorable yields, which would
harm our results of operations;  
    
    if we are disqualified as a REIT, we will be subject to tax as a regular corporation and face
substantial tax liability; and  
    
    complying with REIT requirements might cause us to forego otherwise attractive opportunities. Management has established interest rate risk and other policies for
managing the portfolio of mortgage-backed securities and the related borrowings
outstanding. These policies include, without limitation, evaluating the level
of risk we assume when purchasing adjustable-rate or hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities which are subject to periodic and lifetime interest
rate caps, matching the interest rates on our assets and liabilities, acquiring
new mortgage-backed securities to replace prepaid securities, purchasing
mortgage-backed securities that we believe to have favorable-risk adjusted
expected returns relative to the market interest rates at the time of purchase,
borrowing between eight and 12 times the amount of our stockholders equity,
entering into derivative transactions to protect us from rising interest rates
on our repurchase agreements, and monitoring our qualification as a REIT. Refer to the section titled Risk Factors for additional discussion
regarding these and other risk factors which affect our business. Refer to the
section titled Interest Rate Risk of Item 3 of Part I, Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk, for additional interest rate risk
discussion. Critical Accounting Policies Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. These
accounting principles require us to make some complex and subjective decisions
and assessments. Our most critical accounting policies involve decisions and
assessments which could significantly affect our reported assets and
liabilities, as well as our reported revenues and expenses. We believe that all
of the decisions and assessments upon which our financial statements are based
were reasonable at the time made based upon information available to us at that
time. Descriptions of the significant accounting policies of the Company are
included in Note 1 to financial statements in the Companys 2003 Annual Report
on Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes to these policies during
2004. Management has identified our most critical accounting policies to be
the following: Classifications of Investment Securities Our investments in mortgage-backed securities are classified as
available-for-sale securities which are carried on the balance sheet at their
fair value. The classification of the securities as available-for-sale results
in changes in fair value being recorded as adjustments to accumulated other
comprehensive loss, which is a component of stockholders equity, rather than
immediately through earnings. If available-for-sale securities were classified
as trading securities, there could be substantially greater volatility in
earnings from period-to-period. Valuations of Mortgage-backed Securities Our mortgage-backed securities have fair values as determined by our
Manager with reference to price estimates provided by independent pricing
services and dealers in the securities. Because the price estimates may vary to
some degree between sources, our Manager must make certain judgments and
assumptions about the appropriate price to use to calculate the fair values for
financial reporting purposes. Different judgments and assumptions could result
in different presentations of value. 22




---



##### Table of Contents



When the fair value of an available-for-sale security is less than
amortized cost, management considers whether there is an other-than-temporary
impairment in the value of the security. If, in managements judgment, an
other-than-temporary impairment exists, the cost basis of the security is
written down to the then-current fair value, and the unrealized loss is
transferred from accumulated other comprehensive loss as an immediate reduction
of current earnings (as if the loss had been realized in the period of
impairment). The determination of other-than-temporary impairment is a
subjective process, and different judgments and assumptions could affect the
timing of loss realization. Management considers the following factors when evaluating the securities
for an other-than-temporary impairment:  
    
    the length of the time and the extent to which the market value has been less than the amortized cost;  
    
    whether the security has been downgraded by a rating agency; and  
    
    our intent to hold the security for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery
in market value. The determination of other-than-temporary impairment is evaluated at least
quarterly. If in the future management determines an impairment to be
other-than-temporary we may need to realize a loss that would have an impact on
future income. Interest Income Recognition Interest income on our mortgage-backed securities is accrued based on the
actual coupon rate and the outstanding principal amount of the underlying
mortgages. Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted into interest
income over the lives of the securities using the effective yield method
adjusted for the effects of estimated prepayments based on Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS, No. 91, Accounting for Nonrefundable
Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial
Direct Costs of Leases.If our estimate of prepayments is incorrect, we may be
required to make an adjustment to the amortization or accretion of premiums and
discounts that would have an impact on future income. Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities Our policies permit us to enter into derivative contracts, including
Eurodollar futures contracts and interest rate swaps, as a means of mitigating
our interest rate risk on forecasted interest expense associated with the
benchmark rate on forecasted rollover/reissuance of repurchase agreements or
the interest rate repricing of repurchase agreements, or hedged items, for a
specified future time period. At June 30, 2004, we have engaged in short sales of Eurodollar futures
contracts to mitigate our interest rate risk for the specified future time
period, which is defined as the calendar quarter immediately following the
contract expiration date. The value of these futures contracts is
marked-to-market daily in our margin account with the custodian. Based upon the
daily market value of these futures contracts, we either receive funds into, or
wire funds into, our margin account with the custodian to ensure that an
appropriate margin account balance is maintained at all times through the
expiration of the contracts. At June 30, 2004, we have engaged in interest rate swap contracts to
mitigate our interest rate risk for the period defined by the maturity of the
swap. Cash flows that occur each time the swap is repriced are associated with
forecasted interest expense for a specified future period, which is defined as
the calendar period preceding each repricing date with the same number of
months as the repricing frequency. The futures and interest rate swap contracts, or hedge instruments, have
been designated as cash flow hedges and are evaluated at inception and on an
ongoing basis in order to determine whether they qualify for hedge accounting
under SFAS No. 133, as amended and interpreted. The hedge instrument must be
highly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the hedged item
attributable to the risk being hedged in order to qualify for hedge 23




---



##### Table of Contents



accounting. In order to determine whether the hedge instrument is highly
effective, we use regression methodology to assess the effectiveness of our
hedging strategies. Specifically, at the inception of each new hedge and on an
ongoing basis, we assess effectiveness using ordinary least squares
regression to evaluate the correlation between the rates consistent with the
hedge instrument and the underlying hedged items. A hedge instrument is highly
effective if the changes in the fair value of the derivative provide offset of
at least 80% and not more than 120% of the changes in fair value or cash flows
of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. The futures and
interest rate swap contracts are carried on the balance sheet at fair value.
Any ineffectiveness which arises during the hedging relationship, is recognized
in interest expense during the period in which it arises. Prior to the end of
the specified hedge time period the effective portion of all contract gains and
losses (whether realized or unrealized) is recorded in other comprehensive
income or loss. Realized gains and losses on futures contracts are reclassified
into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense during the specified hedge
time period. Realized gains and losses on interest rate swap contracts are
reclassified into earnings as an adjustment to interest expense during the
period subsequent to the swap repricing date through the remaining maturity of
the swap. For REIT taxable net income purposes, realized gains and losses on
futures and interest rate swap contracts are reclassified into earnings
immediately when positions are closed or have expired. We are not required to account for the futures and interest rate swap
contracts using hedge accounting as described above. If we decided not to
designate the futures and interest rate swap contracts as hedges and to monitor
their effectiveness as hedges, or if we entered into other types of financial
instruments that did not meet the criteria to be designated as hedges, changes
in the fair values of these instruments would be recorded in the statement of
operations, potentially resulting in increased volatility in our earnings. Management Incentive Compensation Expense The Management Agreement provides for the payment of incentive
compensation to the Manager if our financial performance exceeds certain
benchmarks. Incentive compensation is calculated on a cumulative, quarterly
basis for GAAP purposes and on a stand-alone quarterly basis with an annual
cumulative reconciliation calculation for incentive compensation payment
purposes. During each quarter of the fiscal year, we will calculate the
incentive compensation expense quarterly, on a cumulative basis, making any
necessary adjustments for any expensed amounts that were recognized in previous
quarters. As a result, if we experience poor quarterly performance in a
particular quarter and this causes the cumulative incentive compensation
expense for the current quarter to be lower than the cumulative incentive
compensation for the prior quarter, we will record a negative incentive
compensation expense in the current quarter. The incentive compensation is
payable one-half in cash and one-half in the form of our restricted common
stock. For the first, second and third quarters of each fiscal year, incentive
compensation payments actually paid to the Manager are calculated based upon
the net income and relevant performance thresholds solely for the applicable
quarter, and a cumulative calculation is performed at the end of the fiscal
year. As a result, during the first three quarters of each fiscal year there
will be differences between incentive compensation expense, for GAAP purposes,
and the incentive compensation amounts actually paid to the Manager. Any
differences between these amounts will be reflected on the balance sheet as a
receivable due from or payable due to the Manager. In addition, when each
annual cumulative incentive compensation calculation and reconciliation is
performed, the Manager may be required to return cash incentive compensation
payments earlier received or shares of common stock earlier granted, as
applicable, to it as part of its incentive compensation payments for the first
three quarters of the fiscal year. The cash portion of the incentive compensation is accrued and expensed
during the period for which it is calculated and paid. We account for the
restricted stock portion of the incentive compensation in accordance with SFAS
No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, and related interpretations,
and EITF 96-18, Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than
Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services. This restricted stock portion of the incentive compensation will be
granted to the Manager on a quarterly basis pursuant to the terms of the
Management Agreement. The number of shares issued is based on (a) one-half of
the total incentive compensation for the period, divided by (b) the average of
the closing prices of the common stock 24




---



##### Table of Contents



over the 30-day period ending three calendar days prior to the grant date,
less a fair market value discount determined by our board of directors to
account for the transfer restrictions during the vesting period. During periods
of lower stock prices, we will issue more restricted common stock to the
Manager under the Management Agreement to pay for the same amount of incentive
compensation earned in periods that had higher stock prices. Over the vesting
period, any additional shares issued would have a dilutive effect on book value
and net income per share. On the date of each restricted stock grant to the Manager under the
Management Agreement, the fair market value of the common stock is recorded in
the stockholders equity section of our balance sheet as common stock and
additional paid-in capital. The corresponding portion of any restricted stock
grant that is not expensed is reflected in the stockholders equity section of
our balance sheet as deferred compensation. Each quarters incentive
compensation restricted stock grant to the Manager is divided into three
tranches. The first tranche will vest over a one-year period and be expensed
over a five-quarter period, beginning in the quarter in which it was earned.
The second tranche will vest over a two-year period and be expensed over a
nine-quarter period beginning in the quarter in which it was earned. The third
tranche will vest over a three-year period and be expensed over a
thirteen-quarter period beginning in the quarter in which it was earned. As a
result of this vesting schedule for the restricted stock granted to the
Manager, we will incur incentive compensation expense in each of the periods
following the grant of the restricted stock over a three-year period. We will
continue to incur incentive compensation expense related to each restricted
stock grant, even in subsequent periods in which the Manager did not earn
incentive compensation under the Management Agreement. As the price of our common stock changes in future periods, the fair value
of the unvested portions of shares paid to the Manager pursuant to the
Management Agreement shall be marked-to-market, with corresponding entries on
the balance sheet. The net effect of any mark-to-market adjustments to the
value of the unvested portions of the restricted stock shall be expensed in
future periods, on a ratable basis, according to the remaining vesting
schedules of each respective tranche of restricted common stock. Accordingly,
incentive compensation expense related to the portion of the incentive
compensation paid to the Manager in each restricted stock grant may be higher
or lower from one reporting period to the next, and may vary throughout the
vesting period. For example, future incentive compensation expense related to
previously issued but unvested restricted stock will be higher during periods
of increasing stock prices, and lower during periods of decreasing stock
prices. In addition, over the vesting period for each restricted stock grant,
our stockholders equity will increase or decrease based upon the current
market price of our stock. As a result, this will have the effect of increasing
or decreasing our net worth, the factor used in calculating the Managers base
management fee, and may increase or decrease the amount of base management fees
in future periods. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, it is possible for the Manager to
earn incentive compensation each quarter and, as a result, receive a restricted
stock grant each quarter. As the Manager is granted multiple tranches of
restricted common stock for incentive compensation, we will experience
increasing management fee expense due to the cumulative impact of multiple
tranches and vesting schedules of restricted stock grants, and the
mark-to-market impact of the unvested portions of these grants. This will be
true even in periods where there is little change in our income or stock price. We also pay an incentive fee, in the form of cash and restricted stock, to
our Chief Financial Officer, in accordance with the terms of his employment
agreement. The incentive fee is accounted for in the same manner as the
incentive fee earned by the Manager. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In March 2004, the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, reached a
consensus on Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and
Its Application to Certain Investments. This Issue provides clarification with
respect to the meaning of other-than-temporary impairment and its application
to investments classified as either available-for-sale or held-to-maturity
under Statement of Financial Accounting Standard, or SFAS, No. 115, Accounting
for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,(including individual
securities and investments in mutual funds), and investments accounted for
under the cost method or the equity method. The guidance for evaluating whether
an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired must be applied in other-than- 25




---



##### Table of Contents



temporary impairment evaluations made in reporting periods beginning after
June 15, 2004. This Issue did not have a material impact on the Companys
financial statements. Financial Condition Mortgage-Backed Securities At June 30, 2004, we held $4.2 billion of mortgage-backed securities at
fair value, net of unrealized gains of $276 thousand and unrealized losses of
$87.2 million. At December 31, 2003, we held $2.2 billion of mortgage-backed
securities at fair value, net of unrealized gains of $1.1 million and
unrealized losses of $27.4 million. The increase in mortgage-backed securities
held is primarily the result of the public offering which was completed on
March 29, 2004. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, all of the
mortgage-backed securities in our portfolio were purchased at a premium to
their par value and our portfolio had a weighted-average amortized cost of
101.8% and 102.2% of face amount, respectively. Fair value was below amortized cost for certain of the securities held at
June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003,
our entire portfolio was invested in AAA-rated non-agency-backed or
agency-backed mortgage-backed securities. None of the securities held had been
downgraded by a credit rating agency since their purchase. In addition, we
intend to hold the securities until maturity, allowing for the anticipated
recovery in fair value of the securities held. As such, we do not believe any
of the securities held are other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2004 and
December 31, 2003. The stated contractual final maturity of the mortgage loans underlying our
portfolio of mortgage-backed securities ranges up to 30 years, however, the
expected maturities are subject to change based on the prepayments of the
underlying mortgage loans. The following table sets forth the maturity dates,
by year, and percentage composition related to the assets that comprise our
investment portfolio at June 30, 2004: Weighted-Average
    
    % ofAsset
    
    Final Maturity
    
    TotalAdjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities
    
    
    2033
    
    
    
    3.5
    %Hybrid Adjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities
    
    
    2034
    
    
    
    95.2
    %Balloon Mortgage-Backed Securities
    
    
    2033
    
    
    
    1.3
    %Fixed-Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A
 The following table sets forth the maturity dates, by year, and percentage
composition related to the assets that comprise our investment portfolio at
December 31, 2003: Weighted-Average
    
    % ofAsset
    
    Final Maturity
    
    TotalAdjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities
    
    
    2033
    
    
    
    8.6
    %Hybrid Adjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities
    
    
    2033
    
    
    
    88.9
    %Balloon Mortgage-Backed Securities
    
    
    2033
    
    
    
    2.5
    %Fixed-Rate Mortgage-Backed Securities
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A
 Actual maturities of mortgage-backed securities are generally shorter than
stated contractual maturities. Actual maturities of our mortgage-backed
securities are affected by the contractual lives of the underlying mortgages,
periodic payments of principal, and prepayments of principal. The principal payment rate on our mortgage-backed securities, an annual
rate of principal paydowns for our mortgage-backed securities relative to the
outstanding principal balance of our mortgage-backed securities, was 33% and
28% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, respectively. The
principal payment rate for the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003
is considered not meaningful as the Company was organized on April 25, 2003 and
substantive operations did not begin until mid-June 2003. The principal payment
rate attempts to predict the percentage of principal that will paydown over the
next 12 months based on historical principal paydowns. The principal payment
rate for the second quarter of 2004 increased in comparison to the first
quarter of 26




---



##### Table of Contents



2004 primarily due to the residual effects of the lower interest rate
environment in the first quarter of 2004. By June 30, 2004 the residual effects
of the lower interest rate environment had weakened, resulting in a principal
payment rate of 28% for the month ended June 30, 2004. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the weighted-average effective
duration of the securities in our overall investment portfolio, assuming
constant prepayment rates, or CPR, to the balloon or reset date, or the CPB
duration, was 2.12 years and 1.75 years, respectively. CPR is a measure of the
rate of prepayment for our mortgage-backed securities, expressed as an annual
rate relative to the outstanding principal balance of our mortgage-backed
securities. CPB is similar to CPR except that it also assumes that the hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities prepay in full at their next reset
date. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the mortgages underlying our
hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities had fixed interest rates for
a weighted-average of approximately 41 months and 43 months, respectively,
after which time the interest rates reset and become adjustable. The average
length of time until maturity of those mortgages was 30 years. Those mortgages
are also subject to interest rate caps that limit the amount that the
applicable interest rate can increase during any year, known as an annual cap,
and through the maturity of the applicable security, known as a lifetime cap.
At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the mortgages underlying our hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities had average annual caps of 2.34% and
2.47%, respectively, and average lifetime caps of 9.90% and 10.03%,
respectively. The following table summarizes our mortgage-backed securities at June 30,
2004, according to their estimated weighted-average life classifications: Weighted-AverageWeighted-Average Life
    
    Fair Value
    
    Amortized Cost
    
    Coupon(in thousands)Less than one year
    
    $
    210,421
    
    
    $
    213,937
    
    
    
    3.98
    %Greater than one year and less than five years
    
    
    3,922,621
    
    
    
    4,002,959
    
    
    
    4.06
    %Greater than five years
    
    
    81,572
    
    
    
    84,661
    
    
    
    3.50
    %Total
    
    $
    4,214,614
    
    
    $
    4,301,557
    
    
    
    4.05
    %
 The following table summarizes our mortgage-backed securities at December
31, 2003 according to their estimated weighted-average life classifications: Weighted-AverageWeighted-Average Life
    
    Fair Value
    
    Amortized Cost
    
    Coupon(in thousands)Less than one year
    
    $
    299,685
    
    
    $
    304,556
    
    
    
    4.07
    %Greater than one year and less than five years
    
    
    1,829,471
    
    
    
    1,850,899
    
    
    
    4.09
    %Greater than five years
    
    
    32,789
    
    
    
    32,843
    
    
    
    3.96
    %Total
    
    $
    2,161,945
    
    
    $
    2,188,298
    
    
    
    4.09
    %
 The weighted-average lives of the mortgage-backed securities at June 30,
2004 and December 31, 2003 in the tables above are based upon data provided
through a subscription-based financial information service provided by a major
investment bank, assuming constant principal prepayment rates to the balloon or
reset date for each security. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the
weighted-average lives were calculated using estimated prepayment speeds or
actual prepayment speed history. The weighted-average lives for some of the
mortgage-backed securities included in the table above were estimated using
expected prepayment speeds for pools, since certain pools were new issues and
did not have historical performance data available. The prepayment model
considers current yield, forward yield, steepness of the yield curve, current
mortgage rates, the mortgage rate of the outstanding loan, loan age, margin and
volatility. 27




---



##### Table of Contents



The actual weighted-average lives of the mortgage-backed securities in our
investment portfolio could be longer or shorter than the estimates in the
tables above depending on the actual prepayment rates experienced over the life
of the applicable securities and is sensitive to changes in both prepayment
rates and interest rates. Equity Securities Our investment policies allow us to acquire a limited amount of equity
securities, including common and preferred shares issued by other real estate
investment trusts. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we did not hold any
such equity securities. Unsettled Securities Purchases At June 30, 2004, we had no unsettled security trades. At December 31,
2003, we had unsettled securities purchases of $156.1 million. Of the $156.1
million of unsettled securities purchases at December 31, 2003, $59.8 million
were related to to be announced, or TBA, mortgage-backed securities. Other Assets We had other assets of $32.3 million and $10.2 million at June 30, 2004
and December 31, 2003, respectively. Other assets at June 30, 2004 consist
primarily of interest receivable of $15.9 million, principal receivable of
$14.9 million, prepaid directors and officers liability insurance of $411
thousand and deferred compensation of $825 thousand. Other assets at December
31, 2003 consist primarily of interest receivable of $7.3 million and principal
receivable of $2.3 million. Hedging Instruments Hedging involves risk and typically involves costs, including transaction
costs. The costs of hedging can increase as the period covered by the hedging
increases and during periods of rising and volatile interest rates. We may
increase our hedging activity and, thus, increase our hedging costs during such
periods when interest rates are volatile or rising. We generally intend to
hedge as much of the interest rate risk as our Manager determines is in the
best interest of our stockholders, after considering the cost of such hedging
transactions and our desire to maintain our status as a REIT. Our policies do
not contain specific requirements as to the percentages or amount of interest
rate risk that our Manager is required to hedge. There can be no assurance that
our hedging activities will have the desired beneficial impact on our results
of operations or financial condition. Moreover, no hedging activity can
completely insulate us from the risks associated with changes in interest rates
and prepayment rates. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we have engaged in short sales of
Eurodollar futures contracts as a means of mitigating our interest rate risk on
forecasted interest expense associated with the benchmark rate on forecasted
rollover/reissuance of repurchase agreements or the interest rate repricing of
repurchase agreements, or hedged item, for a specified future time period,
which is defined as the calendar quarter immediately following the contract
expiration date. At June 30, 2004, we had short positions on 9,850 Eurodollar
futures contracts, which expire in September 2004, December 2004, March 2005
and June 2005, with a notional amount totaling $9.9 billion. At December 31,
2003, we had short positions on 2,090 Eurodollar futures contracts, which
expire in June 2004, September 2004, and December 2004, with a notional amount
totaling $2.1 billion. The value of these futures contracts is marked-to-market
daily in our margin account with the custodian. Based upon the daily market
value of these futures contracts, we either receive funds into, or wire funds
into, our margin account with the custodian to ensure that an appropriate
margin account balance is maintained at all times through the expiration of the
contracts. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the fair value of the
Eurodollar futures contracts was $9.2 million recorded in assets and $157
thousand recorded in liabilities, respectively. At June 30, 2004, we have engaged in interest rate swap contracts to
mitigate our interest rate risk for the period defined by maturity of the
interest rate swap. Cash flows that occur each time the swap is repriced are
associated with forecasted interest expense for a specified future period,
which is defined as the calendar period preceding each repricing date with the
same number of months as the repricing frequency. At June 30, 2004, the 28




---



##### Table of Contents



current notional amount of interest rate swap contracts totaled $1.0
billion and the fair value of the interest rate swap contracts was $4.1
million. There were no interest rate swap contracts at December 31, 2003. Liabilities We have entered into repurchase agreements to finance some of our
acquisitions of mortgage-backed securities. None of the counterparties to these
agreements are affiliates of the Manager or us. These agreements are secured by
our mortgage-backed securities and bear interest rates that have historically
moved in close relationship to LIBOR. At June 30, 2004, we had established 18
borrowing arrangements with various investment banking firms and other lenders,
14 of which were in use at June 30, 2004. At June 30, 2004, we had outstanding $3.8 billion of repurchase agreements
with a weighted-average current borrowing rate of 1.31%, $322.5 million of
which matures within 30 days, $2.1 billion of which matures between 31 and 90
days, and $1.4 billion of which matures in greater than 90 days. At December
31, 2003, we had outstanding $1.7 billion of repurchase agreements with a
weighted-average current borrowing rate of 1.19%, $337.3 million of which
matures within 30 days, $281.9 million of which matures between 31 and 90 days,
and $1.1 billion of which matures in greater than 90 days. The increase in
outstanding repurchase agreements is primarily due to the public offering which
was completed on March 29, 2004. We used the net proceeds of that follow-on
equity offering to purchase mortgage-backed securities through leverage. It is
our present intention to seek to renew the repurchase agreements outstanding at
June 30, 2004 as they mature under the then-applicable borrowing terms of the
counterparties to our repurchase agreements. At June 30, 2004 and December 31,
2003, the repurchase agreements were secured by mortgage-backed securities with
an estimated fair value of $4.1 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively, and had
a weighted-average maturity of 169 days and 145 days, respectively. The net
amount at risk, defined as the sum of the fair value of securities sold plus
accrued interest income minus the sum of repurchase agreement liabilities plus
accrued interest expense, with all counterparties was $239.9 million and $83.2
million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. After consideration of the terms of our Eurodollar futures and interest
rate swap contracts, the weighted-average maturity of our total liabilities was
383 days and 255 days at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The
increase in the weighted-average maturity of our total liabilities is primarily
attributed to the use of interest rate swap contracts during the three months
ended June 30, 2004 to hedge the impact of changes in interest rates on our
liability costs. We had $29.8 million and $167.9 million of other liabilities at June 30,
2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Other liabilities at June 30, 2004
consisted primarily of $15.9 million of cash distribution payable, $7.6 million
of accrued interest expense on repurchase agreements, $3.1 million of
management fees payable, incentive fees payable and other related party
liabilities, and $2.6 million of collateral held from counterparties. Other
liabilities at December 31, 2003, consisted primarily of $156.1 million of
unsettled securities purchases, $5.3 million of cash distribution payable, $3.8
million of accrued interest expense on repurchase agreements, and $2.5 million
of management fee payable, incentive fees payable and other related party
liabilities. We have a margin lending facility with our primary custodian from which we
may borrow money in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. The
terms of the borrowings, including the rate of interest payable, are agreed to
with the custodian for each amount borrowed. Borrowings are repayable
immediately upon demand by the custodian. At June 30, 2004 and December 31,
2003, there were no outstanding borrowings under the margin lending facility. Stockholders Equity Stockholders equity at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 was $393.2
million and $282.5 million, respectively, which included $86.9 million and
$26.3 million, respectively, of unrealized losses on mortgage-backed securities
available-for-sale and $13.8 million and ($157) thousand, respectively, of net
deferred realized and unrealized gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges presented
as accumulated other comprehensive loss. 29




---



##### Table of Contents



Weighted-average stockholders equity and return on average equity for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2004 were $412.7 million and 14.58%, and
$357.6 million and 14.48%, respectively. Return on average equity is defined as
annualized net income divided by weighted-average stockholders equity. Weighted-average stockholders equity and return on average equity for the
period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003 is considered not meaningful
as the Company was organized on April 25, 2003 and substantive operations did
not begin until mid-June 2003. Our book value at June 30, 2004 was as follows: TotalStockholders
    
    Book ValueEquity
    
    per Share (1)(in thousands)Total stockholders equity (GAAP)
    
    $
    393,240
    
    
    $
    10.66Addback/(Subtract)Accumulated other comprehensive loss on mortgage-backed securities
    
    
    86,942
    
    
    
    2.35Accumulated other comprehensive income on interest rate swap
contracts
    
    
    (4,127
    )
    
    
    (0.11
    )Total stockholders equity, excluding accumulated other comprehensive
loss on mortgage-backed securities and interest rate swap
contracts (NON-GAAP)
    
    $
    476,055
    
    
    $
    12.90
  (1)
    
    Based on 36,900,193 shares outstanding at June 30, 2004 Our book value at December 31, 2003 was as follows: TotalStockholders
    
    Book ValueEquity
    
    per Share (1)(in thousands)Total stockholders equity (GAAP)
    
    $
    282,496
    
    
    $
    11.38AddbackAccumulated other comprehensive loss on mortgage-backed securities
    
    
    26,353
    
    
    
    1.07Total stockholders equity, excluding accumulated other comprehensive
loss on mortgage-backed securities (NON-GAAP)
    
    $
    308,849
    
    
    $
    12.45
  (1)
    
    Based on 24,814,000 shares outstanding at December 31, 2003 Management believes that total stockholders equity, excluding accumulated
other comprehensive income and loss on mortgage-backed securities and interest
rate swap contracts, is a useful measure to investors because book value
unadjusted for temporary changes in fair value more closely represents the cost
basis of our invested assets, net of our leverage, which is the basis for our
net interest income and our distributions to stockholders under the provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code governing REIT distributions. Results of Operations For the three months ended June 30, 2004, net income was $15.0 million or
$0.41 per weighted-average share outstanding (basic and diluted). For the same
period, interest income, net of premium amortization, was approximately $27.2
million, and was primarily earned from investments in mortgage-backed
securities. On March 29, 2004, we completed a public offering of 12,000,000
shares of common stock. Interest income during the three months ended June 30,
2004 reflects the impact of this public offering, however, a substantial
portion of the securities purchased as a result of the public offering were not
settled for the full three month period. As such, interest income is lower than
would be expected for a full quarterly period. Prepayment activity increased
during the 30




---



##### Table of Contents



three months ended June 30, 2004 due to the residual effects of the lower
interest rate environment during the first quarter of 2004. By June 30, 2004,
the residual effects of the lower interest rate environment had weakened,
resulting in decreased prepayment activity during the month ended June 30,
2004. The principal payment rate for the month ended June 30, 2004 was 28%.
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was $9.2 million and
was primarily due to liability costs on short-term borrowings. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, net income was $25.8 million or
$0.83 per weighted-average share outstanding (basic and diluted). For the same
period, interest income, net of premium amortization, was approximately $47.4
million, and was primarily earned from investments in mortgage-backed
securities. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was
$16.0 million and was primarily due to liability costs on short-term
borrowings. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, the weighted-average
yield on average earning assets, net of amortization of premium, was 2.99% and
3.08%, respectively, and the cost of funds on our repurchase agreement
liabilities was 1.08% and 1.12%, respectively, resulting in a net interest
spread of 1.91% and 1.96%, respectively. Cost of funds is defined as total
interest expense divided by average repurchase agreement liabilities. Refer to
the section titled Critical Accounting Policies for a description of our
accounting policy for derivative instruments and hedging activities and the
impact on interest expense. Interest expense for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2004 was calculated as follows: Percentage
    
    
    
    
    
    Percentageof Average
    
    
    
    
    
    of AverageFor the Three
    
    Repurchase
    
    For the Six
    
    RepurchaseMonths Ended
    
    Agreement
    
    Months Ended
    
    AgreementJune 30, 2004
    
    Liabilities
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    Liabilities(in thousands)
    
    
    
    
    
    (in thousands)Interest expense on repurchase agreement liabilities
    
    $
    10,248
    
    
    
    1.21
    %
    
    $
    17,060
    
    
    
    1.19
    %Net hedge ineffectiveness gains on futures and
interest rate swap contracts
    
    
    (1,997
    )
    
    
    (0.24
    )
    
    
    (1,983
    )
    
    
    (0.14
    )Amortization of net realized losses on futures and
interest rate swap contracts
    
    
    412
    
    
    
    0.05
    
    
    
    412
    
    
    
    0.03Net interest expense on interest rate swap contracts
    
    
    511
    
    
    
    0.06
    
    
    
    511
    
    
    
    0.04Other
    
    
    16
    
    
    nm
    
    
    17
    
    
    nmTotal interest expense
    
    $
    9,190
    
    
    
    1.08
    %
    
    $
    16,017
    
    
    
    1.12
    %
 nm = not meaningful The net hedge ineffectiveness gains recognized in interest expense during
the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 are primarily due to an adjustment
to the construction of the hypothetical derivative in accordance with our SFAS
No. 133 accounting policy which is used to measure hedge ineffectiveness on our
Eurodollar futures contracts. We changed the term of our forecasted repurchase
agreement liabilities to more closely conform with common industry issuance
terms. We do not anticipate further changes to the term of our forecasted repurchase
agreement liabilities, and therefore we believe that we will incur no future
ineffectiveness from this change. As required by SFAS No. 133, we recognized
one-time gains in the form of hedge ineffectiveness on our Eurodollar futures
contracts during the three months ended June 30, 2004. The impact of this was
that a portion of the liabilities we had hedged in anticipation of rising
interest rates were recognized as gains or offsets to our interest expense in
the second quarter of 2004. At June 30, 2004, the maximum length of time over
which we were hedging our exposure was 15 months. Average repurchase agreement liabilities during the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2004 were $3.4 billion and $2.8 billion, respectively. For the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003, net income was
$137 thousand or $0.04 per weighted-average share outstanding (basic and
diluted). We were organized on April 25, 2003 and substantive operation began
in mid-June 2003, after completing a private placement of our common stock.
Interest income of $672 thousand and interest expense of $164 thousand during
the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003 31




---



##### Table of Contents



is not indicative of a full quarterly period of financial results and,
therefore, the weighted-average yield on average earning assets and the cost of
funds on our repurchase agreement liabilities for the period April 26, 2003
through June 30, 2003 considered not meaningful. Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2004 were $3.1
million. Base management fees to the Manager under the Management Agreement, which
were $1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004, are based on a
percentage of our average net worth. Average net worth for these purposes is
calculated on a monthly basis and equals the difference between the aggregate
book value of our consolidated assets prior to accumulated depreciation and
other non-cash items, including the fair market value adjustment on
mortgage-backed securities, minus the aggregate book value of our consolidated
liabilities. Incentive fee expense to related parties for the three months ended June
30, 2004 was $1.2 million. Incentive compensation is earned by related parties
when REIT taxable net income (before deducting incentive compensation, net
operating losses and certain other items) relative to the average net invested
assets for the period, as defined in the Management Agreement, exceeds the
threshold return taxable income that would have produced an annualized return
on equity equal to the sum of the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate plus 2.0% for the
same period. For the three months ended June 30, 2004, total incentive
compensation earned by the Manager was $1.8 million, one-half payable in cash
and one-half payable in the form of the Companys common stock. The cash
portion of the incentive fee of $923 thousand for the three months ended June
30, 2004 was expensed in that period as well as 15.2% of the restricted stock
portion of the incentive fees of $141 thousand. In accordance with the terms of
his employment agreement, the Companys Chief Financial Officer earned an
incentive fee for the three months ended June 30, 2004 of $92 thousand. This
incentive fee is also payable one-half in cash and one-half in the form of a
restricted stock award under the Companys 2003 Stock Incentive Plan. The
shares are payable and vest over the same vesting schedule as the stock issued
to the Manager. The cash portion of the incentive fee of $46 thousand for the
three months ended June 30, 2004 was expensed in that period as well as 15.2%
of the restricted stock portion of the incentive fees of $7 thousand. The
remaining incentive fee expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004
consists primarily of the change in fair value of unvested restricted stock
awards. Professional services expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004 of
$228 thousand includes legal, accounting and other professional services
provided to us. The insurance expense for the same period of $137 thousand
consists primarily of premium for directors and officers insurance. Custody
expense of $94 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004 includes the
services provided by our primary custodian. These expenses may vary based on
levels of activity within the portfolio. Other general and administrative
expenses of $106 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2004 consists
primarily of printing costs related to our annual report and proxy and NYSE
listing fees. Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 were $5.7
million. Base management fees to the Manager under the Management Agreement, which
were $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004, are based on a
percentage of our average net worth. Incentive fee expense to related parties for the six months ended June 30,
2004 was $2.1 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, total incentive
compensation earned by the Manager was $3.1 million, one-half payable in cash
and one-half payable in the form of the Companys common stock. The cash
portion of the incentive fee of $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30,
2004 was expensed in that period as well as 15.2% of the restricted stock
portion of the incentive fees of $240 thousand. In accordance with the terms of
his employment agreement, the Companys Chief Financial Officer earned an
incentive fee for the six months ended June 30, 2004 of $157 thousand. This
incentive fee is also payable one-half in cash and one-half in the form of a
restricted stock award under the Companys 2003 Stock Incentive Plan. The
shares are payable and vest over the same vesting schedule as the stock issued
to the Manager. The cash portion of the incentive fee of $79 thousand for the
six months ended June 30, 2004 was expensed in that period as well as 15.2% of
the restricted stock portion of the incentive fees of $12 thousand. 32




---



##### Table of Contents



Professional services expense for the six months ended June 30, 2004 of
$645 thousand includes legal, accounting and other professional services
provided to us. Included in this balance were costs related to the filing of
our resale shelf registration statement totaling $111 thousand. The insurance
expense for the same period of $357 thousand consists primarily of premium for
directors and officers insurance. Custody expense of $161 thousand for the six
months ended June 30, 2004 includes the services provided by our primary
custodian. These expenses may vary based on levels of activity within the
portfolio. Other general and administrative expenses of $194 thousand for the
six months ended June 30, 2004 consists primarily of printing costs related to
the filing of our resale shelf registration statement, our annual report and
proxy and NYSE listing fees. Operating expenses for the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30,
2003 were $371 thousand. Base management fees to the Manager of $85 thousand for the period from
April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003, which are based on a percentage of our
average net worth, were prorated for the portion of the period following the
completion of our June 2003 private placement. We did not pay incentive compensation to the Manager for the period from
April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003. Because of the timing of the Companys
initial investment of portfolio assets (investment activities began on June 11,
2003, the first security purchase settled on June 16, 2003, and $407.8 million
of securities had yet to settle at June 30, 2003), interest income for the
period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003 was substantially lower than
would be expected for a typical full period, both in an absolute sense and also
relative to the average net invested assets for the period. However, for
incentive compensation purposes the calculation for threshold return net
income is based on average net invested assets for the period with no
adjustments made to account for such timing differences. As a result, REIT
taxable net income (before deducting incentive compensation, net operating
losses and certain other items), for the period from April 26, 2003 through
June 30, 2003, was $298 thousand and was less than the threshold return net
income of $426 thousand and, therefore, no incentive fee was earned by the
Manager or paid by the Company for that period. Other operating expenses of $286 thousand for the period from April 26,
2003 through June 30, 2003 were high in proportion to gross interest income and
expense and to net interest income. Included in other operating expenses were
professional services expenses of $224 thousand. These expenses were high
because of the costs of start-up activities involved in the formation of our
company. REIT taxable net income is calculated according to the requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code, rather than GAAP. The following table reconciles GAAP
net income to REIT taxable net income for the three and six months ended June
30, 2004 and for the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2004: For the PeriodFor the Three
    
    For the Six
    
    from April 26,Months Ended
    
    Months Ended
    
    2003 throughJune 30, 2004
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    June 30, 2003(in thousands)GAAP net income
    
    $
    14,954
    
    
    $
    25,754
    
    
    $
    137Adjustments to GAAP net income:Addback of organizational costs expensed during the period
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    163Amortization of organizational costs
    
    
    (8
    )
    
    
    (16
    )
    
    
    (2
    )Addback of stock compensation expense for unvested options
    
    
    2
    
    
    
    4
    
    
    
    Addback of stock compensation expense for unvested restricted stock
    
    
    280
    
    
    
    441
    
    
    
    Subtract net hedge ineffectiveness gains on futures and interest rate
swap contracts
    
    
    (1,422
    )
    
    
    (1,412
    )
    
    
    Addback net realized gains on futures contracts and interest rate swap
contracts
    
    
    2,334
    
    
    
    1,922
    
    
    
    Subtract dividend equivalent rights on restricted stock
    
    
    (37
    )
    
    
    (49
    )
    
    
    Net adjustments to GAAP net income
    
    
    1,149
    
    
    
    890
    
    
    
    161REIT taxable net income
    
    $
    16,103
    
    
    $
    26,644
    
    
    $
    298
 33




---



##### Table of Contents



Undistributed REIT taxable net income for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2004 and for the period from April 26, 2003 through June 30, 2003: For the PeriodFor the Three
    
    For the Six
    
    from April 26,Months Ended
    
    Months Ended
    
    2003 throughJune 30, 2004
    
    June 30, 2004
    
    June 30, 2003(in thousands, except per share data)Undistributed REIT taxable net income, beginning of period
    
    $
    400
    
    
    $
    281
    
    
    $
    REIT taxable net income earned during period
    
    
    16,103
    
    
    
    26,644
    
    
    
    298Distributions declared during period, net of dividend equivalent rights
on restricted stock
    
    
    (15,830
    )
    
    
    (26,252
    )
    
    
    Undistributed REIT taxable net income, end of period
    
    $
    673
    
    
    $
    673
    
    
    $
    298Cash distributions per share declared during period
    
    $
    0.43
    
    
    $
    0.85
    
    
    
    Percentage of REIT taxable net income distributed
    
    
    98.3
    %
    
    
    98.5
    %
    
    
    
 We believe that these presentations of our REIT taxable net income are
useful to investors because they are directly related to the distributions we
are required to make in order to retain our REIT status and to the calculations
of the incentive compensation payable to related parties (before deducting
incentive compensation, net operating losses and certain other items). There
are limitations associated with REIT taxable net income, and by itself it is an
incomplete measure of our financial performance over any period. As a result,
our REIT taxable net income should be considered in addition to, and not as a
substitute for, our GAAP-based net income as a measure of our financial
performance. Contractual Obligations and Commitments At June 30, 2004, we had entered into a Management Agreement with our
Manager. See Note 6 to the financial statements for significant terms of the
Management Agreement. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Since inception, we have not maintained any relationships with
unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often
referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, established for
the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other
contractually narrow or limited purposes. Further, we have not guaranteed any
obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any commitment or intent
to provide additional funding to any such entities. Accordingly, we are not
materially exposed to any market, credit, liquidity or financing risk that
could arise if we had engaged in such relationships. Liquidity and Capital Resources Our primary source of funds at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003
consisted of repurchase agreements totaling $3.8 billion and $1.7 billion,
respectively, with a weighted-average current borrowing rate of 1.31% and
1.19%, respectively, which we used to finance acquisition of mortgage-related
assets. We expect to continue to borrow funds in the form of repurchase
agreements. At June 30, 2004, we had established 18 borrowing arrangements with
various investment banking firms and other lenders, 14 of which were in use on
June 30, 2004. Increases in short-term interest rates could negatively impact
the valuation of our mortgage-related assets, which could limit our borrowing
ability or cause our lenders to initiate margin calls. Amounts due upon
maturity of our repurchase agreements will be funded primarily through the
rollover/reissuance of repurchase agreements and monthly principal and interest
payments received on our mortgage-backed securities. We generally seek to
borrow between eight and 12 times the amount of our equity. Our leverage
ratio, defined as total repurchase agreements divided by total stockholders
equity, at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, was 9.8 and 6.1 times,
respectively. We have a margin lending facility with our primary custodian from which we
may borrow money in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. The
terms of the borrowings, including the rate of interest payable, are agreed to
with the custodian for each amount borrowed. Borrowings are repayable
immediately upon 34




---



##### Table of Contents



demand by the custodian. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, there
were no outstanding borrowings under the margin lending facility. For liquidity, we also rely on cash flows from operations, primarily
monthly principal and interest payments to be received on our mortgage-backed
securities, as well as any primary securities offerings authorized by our board
of directors. On April 26, 2004, we paid a cash distribution of $0.42 per share to our
stockholders of record on March 19, 2004. The distribution was paid to
stockholders of the 24,841,146 shares outstanding on the record date, which was
prior to the completion of our March 29, 2004 public offering. On June 28,
2004, we declared a cash distribution of $0.43 per share to our stockholders of
record on July 8, 2004. We will pay the distribution on August 17, 2004. Both
of these distributions are taxable dividends and are not considered a return of
capital. Distributions are funded with cash flows from our ongoing operations,
including principal and interest payments received on our mortgage-backed
securities. We did not distribute $281 thousand of our REIT taxable net income
for the period from April 26, 2003 through December 31, 2003. During 2004, a
spillback distribution in this amount was approved by our board of directors. We believe that equity capital, combined with the cash flows from
operations and the utilization of borrowings, will be sufficient to enable us
to meet anticipated liquidity requirements. However, an increase in interest
rates substantially above our expectations could cause a liquidity shortfall.
If our cash resources are at any time insufficient to satisfy our liquidity
requirements, we may be required to liquidate mortgage-backed securities or
sell debt or additional equity securities. If required, the sale of
mortgage-backed securities at prices lower than the carrying value of such
assets would result in losses and reduced income. We intend to increase our capital resources by making additional offerings
of equity and debt securities, possibly including classes of preferred stock,
common stock, commercial paper, medium-term notes, collateralized mortgage
obligations and senior or subordinated notes. Such financings will depend on
market conditions for capital raises and for the investment of any net proceeds
therefrom. All debt securities, other borrowings, and classes of preferred
stock will be senior to the common stock in a liquidation of our Company. Inflation Virtually all of our assets and liabilities are financial in nature. As a
result, interest rates and other factors influence our performance far more so
than does inflation. Changes in interest rates do not necessarily correlate
with inflation rates or changes in inflation rates. Our financial statements
are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States and our distributions are determined by our board of directors
based primarily by our net income as calculated for tax purposes; in each case,
our activities and balance sheet are measured with reference to historical cost
and or fair market value without considering inflation. 35




---



##### Table of Contents



Risk Factors Risks Related to Our Business We have a limited operating history and might not be able to operate our
business or implement our operating policies and strategies successfully. We began operations in June 2003, and we have a limited operating history.
The results of our operations will depend on many factors, including the
availability of opportunities for the acquisition of mortgage-related assets,
the level and volatility of interest rates, readily accessible short- and
long-term funding alternatives in the financial markets and economic
conditions. Moreover, delays in fully leveraging and investing the net proceeds
of our public offerings may cause our performance to be weaker than other fully
leveraged and invested mortgage REITs pursuing comparable investment
strategies. You will not have the opportunity to evaluate the manner in which
we invest or the economic merits of particular assets to be acquired.
Furthermore, we face the risk that we might not successfully operate our
business or implement our operating policies and strategies as described in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our investment guidelines permit us to invest up to 10% of our assets in
unrated mortgage-related assets, including mortgage-backed securities rated
below investment-grade, which carry a greater likelihood of default or rating
downgrade than investments in investment-grade mortgage-backed securities and
may cause us to suffer losses. Our asset acquisition policy provides us with the ability to acquire
significant amounts of lower credit quality mortgage-related assets, including
mortgage-backed securities that are not rated at least investment grade by at
least one nationally-recognized statistical rating organization. Under our
policy, up to 10% of our total assets may be non-investment grade
mortgage-backed securities or other investments such as leveraged mortgage
derivative securities, shares of other REITs, mortgage loans or other
mortgage-related investments. If we acquire non-investment-grade
mortgage-backed securities, we are more likely to incur losses because the
mortgages underlying those securities are made to borrowers possessing
lower-quality credit. While all agency certificates are subject to a risk of
default, that risk is greater with non-investment grade mortgage-backed
securities. In addition, the rating agencies are more likely to downgrade the
credit quality of those securities, which would reduce the value of those
securities. Interest rate mismatches between our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities and the borrowings used to fund our purchases of
such mortgage-backed securities might reduce our net income or result in losses
during periods of changing interest rates. We invest primarily in adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities. The mortgages underlying adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities have interest rates that reset periodically,
typically every six months or on an annual basis, based upon market-based
indices of interest rates such as U.S. Treasury bonds or LIBOR. The mortgages
underlying hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities have interest
rates that are fixed for the first few years of the loantypically three, five,
seven or 10 yearsand thereafter their interest rates reset periodically
similar to the mortgages underlying adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities.
We have funded our acquisitions and expect to fund our future acquisitions of
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities in part
with borrowings that have interest rates based on indices and repricing terms
similar to, but with shorter maturities than, the interest rate indices and
repricing terms of the adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities. On June 30, 2004, 98.7% of our investment portfolio
was invested in adjustable-rate or hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed
securities having a weighted-average term to next rate adjustment of
approximately 40 months, while our borrowings had a weighted-average term to
next rate adjustment of approximately 55 days. After consideration of the
duration on our Eurodollar futures and interest rate swap contracts, our
weighted-average maturity of our total liabilities was 383 days. The phrase
weighted average term to next rate adjustment refers to the average of the
periods of time that must elapse before the interest rates adjust for all of
the mortgages underlying our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities in our portfolio, which average is weighted in
proportion to the book values of the applicable securities. During 36




---



##### Table of Contents



periods of changing interest rates, this interest rate mismatch between
our assets and liabilities could reduce or eliminate our net income and
distributions to our stockholders and could cause us to suffer a loss. Accordingly, in a period of rising interest rates, we could experience a
decrease in, or elimination of, net income or a net loss because the interest
rates on our borrowings adjust faster than the interest rates on our
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. Increased levels of prepayments on the mortgages underlying our mortgage-backed
securities might decrease our net interest income or result in a net loss. The mortgage-backed securities that we acquire generally represent
interests in pools of mortgage loans. The principal and interest payments we
receive from our mortgage-backed securities are generally funded by the
payments that mortgage borrowers make on those underlying mortgage loans. When
borrowers pre-pay their mortgage loans sooner than expected, corresponding
prepayments on the mortgage-backed securities occur sooner than expected by the
marketplace. Sooner-than-expected prepayments could harm our results of
operations in the following ways, among others:  
    
    We seek to purchase mortgage-backed securities that we believe to have
favorable risk-adjusted expected returns relative to market interest
rates at the time of purchase. If the coupon interest rate for a
mortgage-backed security is higher than the market interest rate at
the time it is purchased, then that mortgage-backed security will be
acquired at a premium to its par value. In accordance with applicable
accounting rules, we are required to amortize any premiums or
discounts related to our mortgage-backed securities over their
expected terms. The amortization of a premium reduces interest income,
while the amortization of a discount increases interest income. The
expected terms for mortgage-backed securities are a function of the
prepayment rates for the mortgages underlying the mortgage-backed
securities. Mortgage-backed securities that are at a premium to their
par value are more likely to experience prepayment of some or all of
their principal through refinancings. If the mortgages underlying our
premium mortgage-backed securities are prepaid in whole or in part
more quickly than their respective maturity dates, then we must also
amortize their respective premiums more quickly, which would decrease
our net interest income and harm our profitability.  
    
    A substantial portion of our adjustable-rate mortgage-backed
securities may bear interest at rates that are lower than their
fully-indexed rates, which refers to their applicable index rates
plus a margin. If an adjustable-rate mortgage-backed security is
prepaid prior to or soon after the time of adjustment to a
fully-indexed rate, we will have held that mortgage-backed security
while it was less profitable and lost the opportunity to receive
interest at the fully-indexed rate over the remainder of its expected
life.  
    
    If we are unable to acquire new mortgage-backed securities to replace
the prepaid mortgage-backed securities, our financial condition,
results of operations and cash flow may suffer and we could incur
losses. Prepayment rates generally increase when interest rates decline and
decrease when interest rates rise, however, changes in prepayment
rates may lag
behind changes in interest rates and are difficult to predict. Prepayment rates
also may be affected by other factors, including, without limitation,
conditions in the housing and financial markets, general economic conditions
and the relative interest rates on adjustable-rate and fixed-rate mortgage
loans. While we seek to minimize prepayment risk, we must balance prepayment
risk against other risks and the potential returns of each investment when
selecting investments. No strategy can completely insulate us from prepayment
or other such risks. 37




---



##### Table of Contents



We may incur increased borrowing costs related to repurchase agreements that
would harm our results of operations. Our borrowing costs under repurchase agreements are generally adjustable
and correspond to short-term interest rates, such as LIBOR or a short-term
Treasury index, plus or minus a margin. The margins on these borrowings over or
under short-term interest rates may vary depending upon a number of factors,
including, without limitation the following:  
    
    the movement of interest rates;  
    
    the availability of financing in the market; and  
    
    the value and liquidity of our mortgage-backed securities. Most of our borrowings are collateralized borrowings in the form of
repurchase agreements. If the interest rates on these repurchase agreements
increase, our results of operations will be harmed and we may have losses. Interest rate caps related to our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities may reduce our income or cause us to suffer a loss
during periods of rising interest rates. The mortgages underlying our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities are typically subject to periodic and lifetime
interest rate caps. Periodic interest rate caps limit the amount that the
interest rate of a mortgage can increase during any given period. Lifetime
interest rate caps limit the amount an interest rate can increase through the
maturity of a mortgage. At June 30, 2004, 98.7% of our mortgage-backed
securities were based on adjustable-rate or hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages,
substantially all of which were subject to interest rate caps. The percentage
of adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities in our
investment portfolio which are subject to periodic interest rate caps every six
months or annually were 20.5% and 78.2%, respectively. Our borrowings are not subject to similar restrictions. The periodic
adjustments to the interest rates of the mortgages underlying our
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities are based
on changes in an objective index. Substantially all of the mortgages underlying
our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities
adjust their interest rates based on one of two main indices, the U.S. Treasury
index, a monthly or weekly average yield of benchmark U.S. Treasury securities
as published by the Federal Reserve Board, or LIBOR, the interest rate that
banks in London offer for deposits in London of U.S. dollars. The percentages
of the mortgages underlying the adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities in our investment portfolio at June 30, 2004 with
interest rates that reset based on the U.S. Treasury or LIBOR indices were
37.3% and 61.4%, respectively. Accordingly, in a period of rapidly increasing interest rates, the
interest rates paid on our borrowings could increase without limitation while
interest rate caps could limit the increases in the yields on our
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. This
problem is magnified for adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities that are not fully indexed. Further, some of the
mortgages underlying our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic payment caps that result
in a portion of the interest being deferred and added to the principal
outstanding. As a result, we may receive less cash income on adjustable-rate
and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities than we need to pay
interest on our related borrowings. These factors could reduce our net interest
income or cause us to suffer a net loss. We might experience reduced net interest income or a loss from holding
fixed-rate investments during periods of rising interest rates. A significant portion of our investment portfolio consists of hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. At June 30, 2004, 95.2% of our
investment portfolio consisted of hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed
securities. We may also invest in fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities from
time to time, however, at June 30, 2004, none of our portfolio consisted of
fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities. We fund our acquisition of fixed-rate 38




---



##### Table of Contents



mortgage-backed securities, including those based on balloon maturity and
hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages, in part
with short-term repurchase agreements and term loans. During periods of
rising interest rates, our costs associated with borrowings used to fund the
acquisition of fixed-rate mortgage-backed securities are subject to increases
while the income we earn from these assets remains substantially fixed. This
would reduce and could eliminate the net interest spread between the fixed-rate
mortgage-backed securities that we purchase and our borrowings used to purchase
them, which would reduce our net interest income and could cause us to suffer a
loss. Our leverage strategy increases the risks of our operations, which could reduce
our net income and the amount available for distributions or cause us to suffer
a loss. We generally seek to borrow between eight and 12 times the amount of our
equity, although at times our borrowings may be above or below this amount. We
incur this indebtedness by borrowing against a substantial portion of the
market value of our mortgage-backed securities. Our total indebtedness,
however, is not expressly limited by our policies and will depend on our and
our prospective lenders estimate of the stability of our portfolios cash
flow. We face the risk that we might not be able to meet our debt service
obligations or a lenders margin requirements from our income and, to the
extent we cannot, we might be forced to liquidate some of our assets at
disadvantageous prices. Our use of leverage amplifies the risks associated with
other risk factors, which could reduce our net income and the amount available
for distributions or cause us to suffer a loss. For example:  
    
    A majority of our borrowings are secured by our mortgage-backed
securities, generally under repurchase agreements. A decline in the
market value of the mortgage-backed securities used to secure these
debt obligations could limit our ability to borrow or result in
lenders requiring us to pledge additional collateral to secure our
borrowings. In that situation, we could be required to sell
mortgage-backed securities under adverse market conditions in order to
obtain the additional collateral required by the lender. If these
sales are made at prices lower than the carrying value of the
mortgage-backed securities, we would experience losses.  
    
    A default under a mortgage-related asset that constitutes collateral
for a loan could also result in an involuntary liquidation of the
mortgage-related asset, including any cross-collateralized
mortgage-backed securities. This would result in a loss to us of the
difference between the value of the mortgage-related asset upon
liquidation and the amount borrowed against the mortgage-related
asset.  
    
    To the extent we are compelled to liquidate qualified REIT assets to
repay debts, our compliance with the REIT rules regarding our assets
and our sources of income could be negatively affected, which could
jeopardize our status as a REIT. Losing our REIT status would cause us
to lose tax advantages applicable to REITs and would decrease our
overall profitability and distributions to our stockholders.  
    
    If we experience losses as a result of our leverage policy, such
losses would reduce the amounts available for distribution to our
stockholders. We might not be able to use derivatives to mitigate our interest rate and
prepayment risks. Our policies permit us to enter into interest rate swaps, caps and floors
and other derivative transactions to help us reduce our interest rate and
prepayment risks. At June 30, 2004, we were engaged in short sales of
Eurodollar futures and interest rate swap contracts in order to hedge the
impact of changes in interest rates on our liability costs. In the future,
these transactions might mitigate our interest rate and prepayment risks, but
cannot eliminate these risks. Moreover, the use of derivative transactions
could have a negative impact on our earnings and our status as a REIT and,
therefore, our use of such derivatives could be limited. We may enter into ineffective derivative transactions or other hedging
activities that may reduce our net interest income or cause us to suffer
losses. Our policies permit us to, but we are not required to, enter into
derivative transactions such as interest rate swaps, caps and floors and other
derivative transactions to help us seek to reduce our interest rate and
prepayment risks. The effectiveness of any derivative transactions will depend
significantly upon whether we correctly quantify 39




---



##### Table of Contents



the interest rate or
prepayment risks being hedged, our execution of and ongoing monitoring of our
hedging activities, and the treatment of such hedging activities for GAAP
accounting purposes. At June 30, 2004, we were engaged in short sales of Eurodollar futures and
interest rate swap contracts in order to hedge the impact of changes in
interest rates on our liability costs. In the case of these hedges, and any
other future efforts to hedge the effects of interest rate changes on our
liability costs, if we enter into hedging instruments that have higher interest
rates embedded in them as a result of the forward yield curve, and at the end
of the term of these hedging instruments the spot market interest rates for the
liabilities that we hedged are actually lower, then we will have locked in
higher interest rates for our liabilities than would be available in the spot
market at the time and this could result in a narrowing of our net interest
rate spread or result in losses. In some situations, we may sell assets or
hedging instruments at a loss in order to maintain adequate liquidity. In addition, we apply SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities, as amended and interpreted, and record derivatives at
fair value. If the derivatives meet the criteria to be accounted for as hedging
transactions, the effects of the transactions could be materially different as
to timing than if they do not qualify as hedges, and this may cause a narrowing
of our net interest rate spread or result in losses. An increase in interest rates might adversely affect our book value. We use changes in 10-year U.S. Treasury yields as a reference indicator
for changes in interest rates because it is a common market benchmark.
Increases in the general level of interest rates can cause the fair market
value of our assets to decline, particularly those mortgage-backed securities
whose underlying mortgages have fixed-rate components. Our fixed-rate mortgage
securities and our hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities (during
the fixed-rate component of the mortgages underlying such securities) will
generally be more negatively affected by such increases than our
adjustable-rate mortgage securities. In accordance with GAAP, we will be
required to reduce the carrying value of our mortgage-backed securities by the
amount of any decrease in the fair value of our mortgage-backed securities
compared to their respective amortized costs. If unrealized losses in fair
value occur, we will have to either reduce current earnings or reduce
stockholders equity without immediately affecting current earnings, depending
on how we classify such mortgage-backed securities under GAAP. In either case,
our net book value will decrease to the extent of any realized or unrealized
losses in fair value. We may invest in leveraged mortgage derivative securities that generally
experience greater volatility in market prices, and thus expose us to greater
risk with respect to their rate of return. We may acquire leveraged mortgage derivative securities that expose us to
a high level of interest rate risk. The characteristics of leveraged mortgage
derivative securities cause those securities to experience greater volatility
in their market prices. Thus, acquisition of leveraged mortgage derivative
securities will expose us to the risk of greater volatility in our portfolio,
which could reduce our net income and harm our overall results of operations. We depend on borrowings to purchase mortgage-related assets and reach our
desired amount of leverage. If we fail to obtain or renew sufficient funding on
favorable terms or at all, we will be limited in our ability to acquire
mortgage-related assets, which will harm our results of operations. We depend on short-term borrowings to fund acquisitions of
mortgage-related assets and reach our desired amount of leverage. Accordingly,
our ability to achieve our investment and leverage objectives depends on our
ability to borrow money in sufficient amounts and on favorable terms. In
addition, we must be able to renew or replace our maturing short-term
borrowings on a continuous basis. We depend on a few lenders to provide the
primary credit facilities for our purchases of mortgage-related assets. In
addition, our existing indebtedness may limit our ability to make additional
borrowings. If our lenders do not allow us to renew our borrowings or we cannot
replace maturing borrowings on favorable terms or at all, we might have to sell
our mortgage-related assets under adverse market conditions, which would harm
our results of operations and may result in permanent losses. 40




---



##### Table of Contents



Possible market developments could cause our lenders to require us to pledge
additional assets as collateral. If our assets are insufficient to meet the
collateral requirements, we might be compelled to liquidate particular assets
at inopportune times and at disadvantageous prices. Possible market developments, including a sharp or prolonged rise in
interest rates, a change in prepayment rates or increasing market concern about
the value or liquidity of one or more types of mortgage-backed securities in
which our portfolio is concentrated, might reduce the market value of our
portfolio, which might cause our lenders to require additional collateral. Any
requirement for additional collateral might compel us to liquidate our assets
at inopportune times and at disadvantageous prices, thereby harming our
operating results. If we sell mortgage-backed securities at prices lower than
the carrying value of the mortgage-backed securities, we would experience
losses. Our use of repurchase agreements to borrow funds may give our lenders greater
rights in the event that either we or any of our lenders file for bankruptcy. Our borrowings under repurchase agreements may qualify for special
treatment under the bankruptcy code, giving our lenders the ability to avoid
the automatic stay provisions of the bankruptcy code and to take possession of
and liquidate our collateral under the repurchase agreements without delay if
we file for bankruptcy. Furthermore, the special treatment of repurchase
agreements under the bankruptcy code may make it difficult for us to recover
our pledged assets in the event that any of our lenders files for bankruptcy.
Thus, the use of repurchase agreements exposes our pledged assets to risk in
the event of a bankruptcy filing by either any of our lenders or us. Because the assets that we acquire might experience periods of illiquidity, we
might be prevented from selling our mortgage-related assets at opportune times
and prices. We bear the risk of being unable to dispose of our mortgage-related assets
at advantageous times and prices or in a timely manner because mortgage-related
assets generally experience periods of illiquidity. The lack of liquidity might
result from the absence of a willing buyer or an established market for these
assets, as well as legal or contractual restrictions on resale. If we are
unable to sell our mortgage-related assets at opportune times, we might suffer
a loss and/or reduce our distributions. Our board of directors may change our operating policies and strategies without
prior notice or stockholder approval and such changes could harm our business
and results of operations and the value of our stock. Our board of directors has the authority to modify or waive our current
operating policies and our strategies (including our election to operate as a
REIT) without prior notice and without stockholder approval. We cannot predict
the effect any changes to our current operating policies and strategies would
have on our business, operating results and value of our stock. However, the
effects might be adverse. Competition might prevent us from acquiring mortgage-backed securities at
favorable yields, which would harm our results of operations. Our net income depends on our ability to acquire mortgage-backed
securities at favorable spreads over our borrowing costs. In acquiring
mortgage-backed securities, we compete with other REITs, investment banking
firms, savings and loan associations, banks, insurance companies, mutual funds,
other lenders and other entities that purchase mortgage-backed securities, many
of which have greater financial resources than we do. As a result, we may not
be able to acquire sufficient mortgage-backed securities at favorable spreads
over our borrowing costs, which would harm our results of operations. Defaults on the mortgage loans underlying our mortgage-backed securities may
reduce the value of our investment portfolio and may harm our results of
operations. We bear the risk of any losses resulting from any defaults on the mortgage
loans underlying the mortgage-backed securities in our investment portfolio.
Many of the mortgage-backed securities that we acquire will have one or more
forms of credit enhancement provided by third parties, such as insurance
against risk of loss due to default on the underlying mortgage loans or
bankruptcy, fraud and special hazard losses. To the extent that third parties 41




---



##### Table of Contents



have been contracted to insure against these types of losses, the value of such
insurance will depend in part on the creditworthiness and claims-paying ability
of the insurer and the timeliness of reimbursement in the event of a default on
the underlying obligations. Further, the insurance coverage for various types
of losses is limited in amount, and losses in excess of these limitations would
be borne by us. Other mortgage-backed securities that we purchase will be subject to
limited guarantees of the payment of limited amounts of principal and interest
on mortgage loans underlying such mortgage-backed securities, either by
federal government agencies, including Ginnie Mae, by federally-chartered
corporations, including Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or by other corporate
guarantors. While Ginnie Maes obligations are backed by the full faith and
credit of the United States, the obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and
other corporate guarantors are solely their own. As a result, a substantial
deterioration in the financial strength of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or other
corporate guarantors could increase our exposure to future delinquencies,
defaults or credit losses on our holdings of Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac-backed
mortgage-backed securities or other corporate-backed mortgage-backed
securities, and could harm our results of operations. In addition, while
Freddie Mac guarantees the eventual payment of principal, it does not guarantee
the timely payment thereof, and our results of operations may be harmed if
borrowers are late or delinquent in their payments on mortgages underlying
Freddie Mac-backed mortgage-backed securities. Moreover, Fannie Mae, Freddie
Mac, Ginnie Mae and other corporate guarantees relate only to payments of
limited amounts of principal and interest on the mortgages underlying such
agency-backed or corporate-backed securities, and do not guarantee the market
value of such mortgage-backed securities or the yields on such mortgage-backed
securities. As a result, we remain subject to interest rate risks, prepayment
risks, extension risks and other risks associated with our investment in such
mortgage-backed securities and may experience losses in our investment
portfolio. We remain subject to losses despite our strategy of investing in highly-rated
mortgage-backed securities. Our investment guidelines provide that at least 90% of our assets must be
invested in mortgage-backed securities that are either agency-backed or are
rated at least investment grade by at least one rating agency. While
highly-rated mortgage-backed securities are generally subject to a lower risk
of default than lower credit quality mortgage-backed securities and may benefit
from third-party credit enhancements such as insurance or corporate guarantees,
there is no assurance that such mortgage-backed securities will not be subject
to credit losses. Furthermore, ratings are subject to change over time as a
result of a number of factors, including greater than expected delinquencies,
defaults or credit losses, or a deterioration in the financial strength of
corporate guarantors, any of which may reduce the market value of such
securities. Furthermore, ratings do not take into account the reasonableness of
the issue price, interest risks, prepayment risks, extension risks or other
risks associated with such mortgage-backed securities. As a result, while we
attempt to mitigate our exposure to credit risk on a relative basis by focusing
on highly-rated mortgage-backed securities, we cannot eliminate such credit
risks and remain subject to other risks to our investment portfolio and may
suffer losses, which may harm the market price of our common stock. Decreases in the value of the property underlying our mortgage-backed
securities might decrease the value of our assets. The mortgage-backed securities in which we invest are secured by
underlying real property interests. To the extent that the value of the
property underlying our mortgage-backed securities decreases, our security
might be impaired, which might decrease the value of our assets. Insurance will not cover all potential losses on the underlying real property
and the absence thereof may harm the value of our assets. Under our asset acquisition policy, we are permitted to invest up to a
maximum of 10% of our total assets in assets other than mortgage-backed
securities guaranteed by federal agencies or federally chartered entities such
as Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae, or rated as at least investment grade
by a nationally recognized statistical rating agency. Mortgage loans fall
outside of this category of investments under our investment guidelines and are
subject to the 10% limitation. If we elect in the future to purchase mortgage
loans, we may require that each of the mortgage loans that we purchase include
comprehensive insurance covering the underlying real property, including 42




---



##### Table of Contents



liability, fire and extended coverage. There are certain types of losses,
however, generally of a catastrophic nature, such as earthquakes, floods and
hurricanes, that may be uninsurable or not economically insurable. Inflation,
changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations, and
other factors also might make it infeasible to use insurance proceeds to
replace a property if it is damaged or destroyed. Under such circumstances, the
insurance proceeds, if any, might not be adequate to restore the economic value
of the underlying real property, which might impair our security and decrease
the value of our assets. Distressed mortgage loans have a higher risk of future default. If we elect in the future to purchase mortgage loans, we may purchase
distressed mortgage loans as well as mortgage loans that have had a history of
delinquencies. These distressed mortgage loans may be in default or may have a
greater than normal risk of future defaults and delinquencies, as compared to a
pool of newly-originated, high quality loans of comparable type, size and
geographic concentration. Returns on an investment of this type depend on
accurate pricing of such investment, the borrowers ability to make required
payments or, in the event of default, the ability of the loans servicer to
foreclose and liquidate the mortgage loan. We cannot assure you that the
servicer will be able to liquidate a defaulted mortgage loan in a
cost-effective manner, at an advantageous price or in a timely manner. Subordinated loans on real estate are subject to higher risks. If we elect in the future to purchase mortgage loans, we may acquire loans
secured by commercial properties, including loans that are subordinate to first
liens on the underlying commercial real estate. Subordinated mortgage loans are
subject to greater risks of loss than first lien mortgage loans. An overall
decline in the real estate market could reduce the value of the real property
securing such loans such that the aggregate outstanding balance of the
second-lien loan and the balance of the more senior loan on the real property
exceed the value of the real property. We depend on our key personnel and the loss of any of our key personnel could
severely and detrimentally affect our operations. We depend on the diligence, experience and skill of our officers and the
people working on behalf of our Manager for the selection, acquisition,
structuring and monitoring of our mortgage-related assets and associated
borrowings. Our key officers include Gail Seneca, Albert Gutierrez, Christopher
Zyda, Andrew Chow and Troy Grande. We have not entered into employment
agreements with our senior officers other than Mr. Zyda, who is our Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer. With the exception of Mr. Zyda, we do
not currently employ other senior officers dedicated solely to our business,
and our officers are free to engage in competitive activities in our industry.
The loss of any key person could harm our business, financial condition, cash
flow and results of operations. Risks Related to Our Manager The Manager has not previously managed a REIT and we cannot assure you that the
Managers past experience will be sufficient to successfully manage our
business as a REIT. Seneca Capital Management LLC has not previously managed a REIT, and does
not have any prior experience in complying with the income, asset and other
limitations imposed by the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. Those
provisions are complex and the failure to comply with those provisions in a
timely manner could prevent us from qualifying as a REIT or could force us to
pay unexpected taxes and penalties. In such event, our net income would be
reduced and we could incur a loss. Our Manager has significant influence over our affairs, and might cause us to
engage in transactions that are not in our or our stockholders best interests. In addition to managing us and having at least two of its designees as
members of our board, the Manager provides advice on our operating policies and
strategies. The Manager may also cause us to engage in future 43




---



##### Table of Contents



transactions with
the Manager and its affiliates, subject to the approval of, or guidelines
approved by, the independent members of our board of directors. Our directors,
however, rely primarily on information supplied by our Manager in reaching
their determinations. Accordingly, our Manager has significant influence over
our affairs, and may cause us to engage in transactions which are not in our or
our stockholders best interests. Our Manager and its affiliates might allocate mortgage-related opportunities to
other entities, and thus might divert attractive investment opportunities away
from us. Our operations and assets are managed by specified individuals at the
Manager. The Manager and its affiliates, including some of our officers, manage
portfolios for parties unrelated to us. These multiple responsibilities might
create conflicts of interest for the Manager and these individuals if they are
presented with opportunities that might benefit us and their other clients. The
Manager and these individuals must allocate investments among our portfolio and
their other clients by determining the entity or account for which the
investment is most suitable. In making this determination, the Manager and
these individuals consider the investment strategy and guidelines of each
entity or account with respect to the acquisition of assets, leverage,
liquidity and other factors that the Manager and these individuals determine to
be appropriate. However, the Manager and those working on its behalf have no
obligation to make any specific investment opportunities available to us and
the above-mentioned conflicts of interest might result in decisions or
allocations of investments that are not in our or our stockholders best
interests. We will pay the Manager incentive compensation based on our portfolios
performance. This arrangement may lead the Manager to recommend riskier or more
speculative investments in an effort to maximize its incentive compensation. In addition to its base management fee, the Manager earns incentive
compensation for each fiscal quarter equal to a specified percentage of the
amount by which our return on equity, before deducting incentive compensation,
exceeds a return based on the 10 year U.S. Treasury rate plus 2%. The
percentage for this calculation is the weighted average of the following
percentages based on our average net invested assets for the period:  
    
    20% for the first $400 million of our average net invested assets; and  
    
    10% of our average net invested assets in excess of $400 million. Pursuant to the formula for calculating the Managers incentive
compensation, the Manager shares in our profits but not in our losses.
Consequently, as the Manager evaluates different mortgage-backed securities and
other investments for our account, there is a risk that the Manager will cause
us to assume more risk than is prudent in an attempt to increase its incentive
compensation. Other key criteria related to determining appropriate investments
and investment strategies, including the preservation of capital, might be
under-weighted if the Manager focuses exclusively or disproportionately on
maximizing its income. We may be obligated to pay the Manager incentive compensation even if we incur
a loss. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, the Manager is entitled to receive
incentive compensation for each fiscal quarter in an amount equal to a tiered
percentage of the excess of our taxable income for that quarter (before
deducting incentive compensation, net operating losses and certain other items)
above a threshold return for that quarter. In addition, the Management
Agreement further provides that our taxable income for incentive compensation
purposes excludes net capital losses that we may incur in the fiscal quarter,
even if such capital losses result in a net loss in our statement of operations
for that quarter. Thus, we may be required to pay the Manager incentive
compensation for a fiscal quarter even if there is a decline in the value of
our portfolio or we incur a net loss for that quarter. 44




---



##### Table of Contents



During periods of declining market prices for shares of our common stock, we
may be required to issue greater numbers of shares to the Manager for the same
amount of incentive compensation arising under the Management Agreement, which
will have a dilutive effect on our stockholders that may harm the market price
of our common stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, the incentive
compensation payable to the Manager for each fiscal quarter is paid one-half in
cash and one-half in restricted shares of our common stock. The number of
shares to be issued to the Manager is based on (a) one-half of the total
incentive compensation for the period, divided by (b) the average of the
closing prices of the common stock over the 30-day period ending three calendar
days prior to the grant date, less a fair market value discount determined by
our board of directors. During periods of
declining market prices for shares of our common stock, we may be required
to issue more shares to the Manager for the same amount of incentive
compensation. Although these shares will initially be subject to restrictions
on transfer which lapse ratably over a three-year period, the issuance of these
shares will have a dilutive effect on our stockholders which may harm the
market price of our common stock. Because the Manager might receive a significant fee if we terminate the
Management Agreement, economic considerations might preclude us from
terminating the Management Agreement in the event that the Manager fails to
meet our expectations. If we terminate the Management Agreement without cause or because we
decide to manage our company internally or if the Manager terminates the
management in the event of a change of control, then we will have to pay a
significant fee to the Manager. The amount of the fee depends on whether:  
    
    we terminate the Management Agreement without cause in connection with
a decision to manage our portfolio internally, in which case we will
be obligated to pay to the Manager a fee equal to the highest amount
of management fees incurred in a particular year during the then three
most recent years; or  
    
    our decision to terminate the Management Agreement without cause is
for a reason other than our decision to manage our portfolio
internally, in which case we will be obligated to pay the Manager an
amount equal to two times the highest amount of management fees
incurred in a particular year during the then three most recent years. In each of the above cases, the Manager will also receive accelerated
vesting of the equity component of its incentive compensation. The actual
amount of such fee cannot be known at this time because it is based in part on
the performance of our portfolio of mortgage-backed securities. Paying this fee
would reduce significantly the cash available for distribution to our
stockholders and might cause us to suffer a net operating loss. Consequently,
terminating the Management Agreement might not be advisable even if we
determine that it would be more efficient to operate with an internal
management structure or if we are otherwise dissatisfied with the Managers
performance. Investors may not be able to estimate with certainty the aggregate fees and
expense reimbursements that will be paid to the Manager under the Management
Agreement and the cost-sharing agreement due to the time and manner in which
the Managers incentive compensation and expense reimbursements are determined. The Manager may be entitled to substantial fees pursuant to the Management
Agreement. The Managers base management fee is calculated as a percentage of
our average net worth. The Managers incentive compensation is calculated as a
tiered percentage of our taxable income (before deducting certain items) in
excess of a threshold amount of taxable income and is indeterminable in advance
of a particular period. Since future payments of base management fees,
incentive compensation and expense reimbursements are determined at future
dates based upon our then-applicable average net worth, results of operations
and actual expenses incurred by the Manager, such fees and expense
reimbursements cannot be estimated with mathematical certainty. Any base
management fees, incentive compensation or expense reimbursements payable to
the Manager may be materially greater or less than the historical amounts and
we can provide no assurance at this time as to the amount of any such base
management fee, incentive compensation or expense reimbursements that may be
payable to the Manager in the future. 45




---



##### Table of Contents



The Manager may render services to other mortgage investors, which could reduce
the amount of time and effort that the Manager devotes to us. Our Management Agreement with the Manager does not restrict the right of
the Manager, any persons working on its behalf or any of its affiliates, to
carry on their respective businesses, including the rendering of advice to
others regarding the purchase of mortgage-backed securities that would meet our
investment criteria. In addition, the Management Agreement does not specify a
minimum time period that the Manager and its personnel must devote to managing
our investments. The ability of the Manager to engage in these other business
activities, and specifically to manage mortgage-related assets for third
parties, could reduce the time and effort it spends managing our portfolio to
the detriment of our investment returns. The Managers liability is limited under the Management Agreement, and we have
agreed to indemnify the Manager against certain liabilities. The Manager has not assumed any responsibility to us other than to render
the services described in the Management Agreement, and will not be responsible
for any action of our board of directors in declining to follow the Managers
advice or recommendations. The Manager and its directors, officers and
employees will not be liable to us for acts performed by its officers,
directors, or employees in accordance with and pursuant to the Management
Agreement, except for acts constituting gross negligence, recklessness, willful
misconduct or active fraud in connection with their duties under the Management
Agreement. We have agreed to indemnify the Manager and its directors, officers
and employees with respect to all expenses, losses, damages, liabilities,
demands, charges and claims arising from acts of the Manager not constituting
gross negligence, recklessness, willful misconduct or active fraud. Legal and Tax Risks If we are disqualified as a REIT, we will be subject to tax as a regular
corporation and face substantial tax liability. Qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and
complex U.S. federal income tax code provisions for which only a limited number
of judicial or administrative interpretations exist. Accordingly, it is not
certain we will be able to remain qualified as a REIT for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. Even a technical or inadvertent mistake could jeopardize our REIT
status. Furthermore, Congress or the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS,
might change tax laws or regulations and the courts might issue new rulings, in
each case potentially having retroactive effect, that could make it more
difficult or impossible for us to qualify as a REIT. If we fail to qualify as a
REIT in any tax year, then:  
    
    we would be taxed as a regular domestic corporation, which, among
other things, means that we would be unable to deduct distributions to
stockholders in computing taxable income and we would be subject to
U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income at regular corporate
rates;  
    
    any resulting tax liability could be substantial, would reduce the
amount of cash available for distribution to stockholders, and could
force us to liquidate assets at inopportune times, causing lower
income or higher losses than would result if these assets were not
liquidated; and  
    
    unless we were entitled to relief under applicable statutory
provisions, we would be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the
subsequent four taxable years following the year during which we lost
our qualification and, thus, our cash available for distribution to
our stockholders would be reduced for each of the years during which
we did not qualify as a REIT. Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we might face other tax liabilities
that reduce our cash flow. Further, we might be subject to federal, state and
local taxes on our income and property. Any of these taxes would decrease cash
available for distribution to our stockholders. 46




---



##### Table of Contents



Complying with the REIT requirements might cause us to forego otherwise
attractive opportunities. In order to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we
must satisfy tests concerning, among other things, our sources of income, the
nature and diversification of our mortgage-backed securities, the amounts we
distribute to our stockholders and the ownership of our stock. We may also be
required to make distributions to our stockholders at disadvantageous times or
when we do not have funds readily available for distribution. Thus, compliance
with REIT requirements may cause us to forego opportunities we would otherwise
pursue. In addition, the REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code impose a
100% tax on income from prohibited transactions. Prohibited transactions
generally include sales of assets that constitute inventory or other property
held for sale in the ordinary course of a business, other than foreclosure
property. This 100% tax could impact our desire to sell mortgage-backed
securities at otherwise opportune times if we believe such sales could be
considered a prohibited transaction. Complying with the REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge
effectively. The existing REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code substantially
limit our ability to hedge mortgage-backed securities and related borrowings.
Under these provisions, our annual income from qualified hedges, together with
any other income not generated from qualified REIT real estate assets, is
limited to less than 25% of our gross income. In addition, we must limit our
aggregate income from hedging and services from all sources, other than from
qualified REIT real estate assets or qualified hedges, to less than 5% of our
annual gross income. As a result, we might in the future have to limit our use
of advantageous hedging techniques. This could leave us exposed to greater
risks associated with changes in interest rates than we would otherwise want to
bear. If we were to violate the 25% or 5% limitations, we might have to pay a
penalty tax equal to the amount of our income in excess of those limitations,
multiplied by a fraction intended to reflect our profitability. If we fail to
satisfy the 25% or 5% limitations, unless our failure was due to reasonable
cause and not due to willful neglect, we could lose our REIT status for federal
income tax purposes. Complying with the REIT requirements may force us to liquidate otherwise
attractive investments. In order to qualify as a REIT, we must ensure that at the end of each
calendar quarter at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash
items, government securities and qualified REIT real estate assets. The
remainder of our investment in securities generally cannot include more than
10% of the outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of
the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition,
generally, no more than 5% of the value of our assets can consist of the
securities of any one issuer. If we fail to comply with these requirements, we
must dispose of a portion of our assets within 30 days after the end of the
calendar quarter in order to avoid losing our REIT status and suffering adverse
tax consequences. Complying with the REIT requirements may force us to borrow to make
distributions to our stockholders. As a REIT, we must distribute 90% of our annual taxable income (subject to
certain adjustments) to our stockholders. From time to time, we might generate
taxable income greater than our net income for financial reporting purposes
from, among other things, amortization of capitalized purchase premiums, or our
taxable income might be greater than our cash flow available for distribution
to our stockholders. If we do not have other funds available in these
situations, we might be unable to distribute 90% of our taxable income as
required by the REIT rules. In that case, we would need to borrow funds, sell a
portion of our mortgage-backed securities potentially at disadvantageous prices
or find another alternative source of funds. These alternatives could increase
our costs or reduce our equity and reduce amounts available to invest in
mortgage-backed securities. 47




---



##### Table of Contents



Failure to maintain an exemption from the Investment Company Act, would harm
our results of operations. We intend to conduct our business so as not to become regulated as an
investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. If we
fail to qualify for this exemption, our ability to use leverage would be
substantially reduced and we would be unable to conduct our business as
described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The Investment Company Act exempts entities that are primarily engaged in
the business of purchasing or otherwise acquiring mortgages and other liens on,
and interests in, real estate. Under the current interpretation of the SEC
staff, in order to qualify for this exemption, we must maintain at least 55% of
our assets directly in these qualifying real estate interests. Mortgage-backed
securities that do not represent all of the certificates issued with respect to
an underlying pool of mortgages may be treated as separate from the underlying
mortgage loans and, thus, may not qualify for purposes of the 55% requirement.
Therefore, our ownership of these mortgage-backed securities is limited by the
provisions of the Investment Company Act. In satisfying the 55% requirement under the Investment Company Act, we
treat as qualifying interests mortgage-backed securities issued with respect to
an underlying pool as to which we hold all issued certificates. If the SEC or
its staff adopts a contrary interpretation of such treatment, we could be
required to sell a substantial amount of our mortgage-backed securities under
potentially adverse market conditions. Further, in our attempts to ensure that
we at all times qualify for the exemption under the Investment Company Act, we
might be precluded
from acquiring mortgage-backed securities if their yield is higher than
the yield on mortgage-backed securities that could be purchased in a manner
consistent with the exemption. These factors may lower or eliminate our net
income. Misplaced reliance on legal opinions or statements by issuers of
mortgage-backed securities could result in a failure to comply with the REIT
income or assets tests. When purchasing mortgage-backed securities, we may rely on opinions of
counsel for the issuer or sponsor of such securities, or statements made in
related offering documents, for purposes of determining whether and to what
extent those securities constitute REIT real estate assets for purposes of the
REIT asset tests and produce income that qualifies under the REIT gross income
tests. The inaccuracy of any such opinions or statements may adversely affect
our REIT qualification and result in significant corporate-level tax. One-action rules may harm the value of the underlying property. Several states have laws that prohibit more than one action to enforce a
mortgage obligation, and some courts have construed the term action broadly.
In such jurisdictions, if the judicial action is not conducted according to
law, there may be no other recourse in enforcing a mortgage obligation, thereby
decreasing the value of the underlying property. We may be harmed by changes in various laws and regulations. Changes in the laws or regulations governing the Manager or its affiliates
may impair the Managers or its affiliates ability to perform services in
accordance with the Management Agreement. Our business may be harmed by changes
to the laws and regulations affecting our Manager or us, including changes to
securities laws and changes to the Internal Revenue Code applicable to the
taxation of REITs. New legislation may be enacted into law or new
interpretations, rulings or regulations could be adopted, any of which could
harm us, our Manager and our stockholders, potentially with retroactive effect. Legislation was recently enacted that reduces the maximum tax rate of
non-corporate taxpayers for capital gains (for taxable years ending on or after
May 6, 2003 and before January 1, 2009) and for dividends (for taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2002 and before January 1, 2009) to 15%.
Generally, dividends paid by REITs are not eligible for the new 15% federal
income tax rate, with certain exceptions discussed at United States Federal
Income Tax ConsiderationsTaxation of Taxable United States
StockholdersDistributions Generally. Although this legislation does not
adversely affect the taxation of REITs or dividends paid by REITs, the more
favorable 48




---



##### Table of Contents



treatment of regular corporate dividends could cause investors who
are individuals to consider stocks of other corporations that pay dividends as
more attractive relative to stocks of REITs. It is not possible to predict
whether this change in perceived relative value will occur, or what the effect
will be on the market price of our common stock. In addition, legislation was recently introduced in the United States
House of Representatives and the United States Senate that would amend certain
rules relating to REITs. Among other changes, the proposed legislation would
provide the IRS with the ability to impose monetary penalties, rather than a
loss of REIT status, for reasonable cause violations of certain tests relating
to REIT qualification, and would change the formula for calculating the tax
imposed for certain violations of the income tests discussed at United States
Federal Income Tax ConsiderationsRequirements for Qualification as a
REITIncome Tests. In general, the changes would apply to taxable years
beginning after the date the legislation is enacted. At the date hereof, it is
not possible to predict with any certainty at this time whether the proposed
legislation will be enacted in its current form. We may incur excess inclusion income that would increase the tax liability of
our stockholders. In general, dividend income that a tax-exempt entity receives from us
should not constitute unrelated business taxable income as defined in Section
512 of the Internal Revenue Code. If we realize excess inclusion income and
allocate it to stockholders, this income cannot be offset by net operating
losses. If the stockholder is a tax-exempt entity, then this income would be
fully taxable as unrelated business taxable income under Section 512
of the Internal Revenue Code. If the stockholder is foreign, it would be
subject to U.S. federal income tax withholding on this income without reduction
pursuant to any otherwise applicable income-tax treaty. Excess inclusion income could result if we held a residual interest in a
real estate mortgage investment conduit, or REMIC. Excess inclusion income also
would be generated if we were to issue debt obligations with two or more
maturities and the terms of the payments on these obligations bore a
relationship to the payments that we received on our mortgage-backed securities
securing those debt obligations. We generally structure our borrowing
arrangements in a manner designed to avoid generating significant amounts of
excess inclusion income. We do, however, enter into various repurchase
agreements that have differing maturity dates and afford the lender the right
to sell any pledged mortgage securities if we default on our obligations. The
IRS may determine that these borrowings give rise to excess inclusion income
that should be allocated among stockholders. Furthermore, some types of
tax-exempt entities, including voluntary employee benefit associations and
entities that have borrowed funds to acquire their shares of our common stock,
may be required to treat a portion of or all of the dividends they may receive
from us as unrelated business taxable income. Finally, we may invest in equity
securities of other REITs and it is possible that we might receive excess
inclusion income from those investments. Risks Related to Investing in Our Common Stock We have not established a minimum distribution payment level, and we cannot
assure you of our ability to make distributions to our stockholders in the
future. We intend to make quarterly distributions to our stockholders in amounts
such that we distribute all or substantially all of our taxable income in each
year, subject to certain adjustments. This, along with other factors, should
enable us to qualify for the tax benefits accorded to a REIT under the Internal
Revenue Code. We have not established a minimum distribution payment level and
our ability to make distributions might be harmed by the risk factors described
in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All distributions will be made at the
discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, our
financial condition, maintenance of our REIT status and such other factors as
our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time. We cannot assure
you that we will have the ability to make distributions to our stockholders in
the future. Restrictions on ownership of a controlling percentage of our capital stock
might limit your opportunity to receive a premium on our stock. For the purpose of preserving our REIT qualification and for other
reasons, our charter prohibits direct or constructive ownership by any person
of more than 9.8% of the lesser of the total number or value of the outstanding 49




---



##### Table of Contents



shares of our common stock or more than 9.8% of the outstanding shares of our
preferred stock. The constructive ownership rules in our charter are complex
and may cause the outstanding stock owned by a group of related individuals or
entities to be deemed to be constructively owned by one individual or entity.
As a result, the acquisition of less than 9.8% of the outstanding stock by an
individual or entity could cause that individual or entity to own
constructively in excess of 9.8% of the outstanding stock, and thus be subject
to the ownership limit in our charter. Any attempt to own or transfer shares of
our common or preferred stock in excess of the ownership limit without the
consent of our board of directors shall be void, and will result in the shares
being transferred by operation of law to a charitable trust. These provisions
might inhibit market activity and the resulting opportunity for our
stockholders to receive a premium for their shares that might otherwise exist
if any person were to attempt to assemble a block of shares of our stock in
excess of the number of shares permitted under our charter and which may be in
the best interests of our stockholders. Certain provisions of Maryland law and our charter and bylaws could hinder,
delay or prevent a change in control of our company. Certain provisions of Maryland law, our charter and our bylaws have the
effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing transactions that involve an
actual or threatened change in control of our company. These provisions include
the following:  
    
    Classified Board of Directors.Our board of directors is
divided into three classes with staggered terms of office of
three years each. The classification and staggered terms of
office of our directors make it more difficult for a third
party to gain control of our board of directors. At least two
annual meetings of stockholders, instead of one, generally
would be required to effect a change in a majority of the
board of directors.
    
    Removal of Directors.Under our charter, subject to the
rights of one or more classes or series of preferred stock to
elect one or more directors, a director may be removed only
for cause and only by the affirmative vote of at least
two-thirds of all votes entitled to be cast by our
stockholders generally in the election of directors.
    
    Number of Directors, Board Vacancies, Term of Office.We have
elected to be subject to certain provisions of Maryland law
which vest in the board of directors the exclusive right to
determine the number of directors and the exclusive right, by
the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining
directors, to fill vacancies on the board even if the
remaining directors do not constitute a quorum. These
provisions of Maryland law, which are applicable even if
other provisions of Maryland law or the charter or bylaws
provide to the contrary, also provide that any director
elected to fill a vacancy shall hold office for the remainder
of the full term of the class of directors in which the
vacancy occurred, rather than the next annual meeting of
stockholders as would otherwise be the case, and until his or
her successor is elected and qualifies.
    
    Limitation on Stockholder-Requested Special Meetings.Our
bylaws provide that our stockholders have the right to call a
special meeting only upon the written request of stockholders
entitled to cast not less than a majority of all the votes
entitled to be cast by the stockholders at such meeting.
    
    Advance Notice Provisions for Stockholder Nominations and
Proposals.Our bylaws require advance written notice for
stockholders to nominate persons for election as directors
at, or to bring other business before, any meeting of
stockholders. This bylaw provision limits the ability of
stockholders to make nominations of persons for election as
directors or to introduce other proposals unless we are
notified in a timely manner prior to the meeting.
    
    Exclusive Authority of our Board to Amend the Bylaws.Our
bylaws provide that our board of directors has the exclusive
power to adopt, alter or repeal any provision of the bylaws
or to make new bylaws. Thus, our stockholders may not effect
any changes to our bylaws. 50




---



##### Table of Contents




    
    Preferred Stock.Under our charter, our board of directors
has authority to issue preferred stock from time to time in
one or more series and to establish the terms, preferences
and rights of any such series of preferred stock, all without
approval of our stockholders.
    
    Duties of Directors with Respect to Unsolicited Takeovers.
Maryland law provides protection for Maryland corporations
against unsolicited takeovers by limiting, among other
things, the duties of the directors in unsolicited takeover
situations. The duties of directors of Maryland corporations
do not require them to (1) accept, recommend or respond to
any proposal by a person seeking to acquire control of the
corporation, (2) authorize the corporation to redeem any
rights under, or modify or render inapplicable, any
stockholders rights plan, (3) make a determination under the
Maryland Business Combination Act or the Maryland Control
Share Acquisition Act, or (4) act or fail to act solely
because of the effect of the act or failure to act may have
on an acquisition or potential acquisition of control of the
corporation or the amount or type of consideration that may
be offered or paid to the stockholders in an acquisition.
Moreover, under Maryland law the act of the directors of a
Maryland corporation relating to or affecting an acquisition
or potential acquisition of control is not subject to any
higher duty or greater scrutiny than is applied to any other
act of a director. Maryland law also contains a statutory
presumption that an act of a director of a Maryland
corporation satisfies the applicable standards of conduct for
directors under Maryland law.
    
    Ownership Limit. In order to preserve our status as a REIT
under the Internal Revenue Code, our charter generally
permits any single stockholder, or any group of affiliated
stockholders, from beneficially owning more than 9.8% of our
outstanding common or preferred stock unless our board of
directors waives or modifies this ownership limit.
    
    Maryland Business Combination Act. The Maryland Business Combination
Act provides that unless exempted, a Maryland corporation may not
engage in business combinations, including mergers, dispositions of
10% or more of its assets, certain issuances of shares of stock and
other specified transactions, with an interested stockholder or an
affiliate of an interested stockholder for five years after the most
recent date on which the interested stockholder became an interested
stockholder, and thereafter unless specified criteria are met. An
interested stockholder is generally a person owning or controlling,
directly or indirectly, 10% or more of the voting power of the
outstanding stock of a Maryland corporation. Our board of directors
has adopted a resolution exempting our company from this statute.
However, our board of directors may repeal or modify this resolution
in the future, in which case the provisions of the Maryland Business
Combination Act will be applicable to business combinations between
our company and other persons.
    
    Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. Maryland law provides that
control shares of a corporation acquired in a control share
acquisition shall have no voting rights except to the extent approved
by a vote of two-thirds of the votes eligible to be cast on the matter
under the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. Control shares
means shares of stock that, if aggregated with all other shares of
stock previously acquired by the acquiror, would entitle the acquiror
to exercise voting power in electing directors within one of the
following ranges of the voting power: one-tenth or more but less than
one-third, one-third or more but less than a majority or a majority or
more of all voting power. A control share acquisition means the
acquisition of control shares, subject to certain exceptions. If
voting rights of control shares acquired in a control share
acquisition are not approved at a stockholders meeting, then subject
to certain conditions and limitations, the issuer may redeem any or
all of the control shares for fair value. If voting rights of such
control shares are approved at a stockholders meeting and the
acquiror becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares of stock
entitled to vote, all other stockholders may exercise appraisal
rights. Our bylaws contain a provision exempting acquisitions of our
shares from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. However, our
board of directors may amend our bylaws in the future to repeal or
modify this exemption, in which case any control shares of our company
acquired in a control share acquisition will be subject to the
Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. 51




---



##### Table of Contents



Future offerings of debt securities, which would be senior to our common stock
upon liquidation, or equity securities, which would dilute our existing
stockholders and may be senior to our common stock for the purposes of
distributions, may harm the value of our common stock. In the future, we may attempt to increase our capital resources by making
additional offerings of debt or equity securities, including commercial paper,
medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes and classes of preferred stock
or common stock. Upon the liquidation of our company, holders of our debt
securities and shares of preferred stock and lenders with respect to other
borrowings will receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the
holders of our common stock. Additional equity offerings by us may dilute the
holdings of our existing stockholders or reduce the value of our common stock,
or both. Our preferred stock, if issued, would have a preference on
distributions that could limit our ability to make distributions to the holders
of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future
offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control,
we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future
offerings. Thus, our stockholders bear the risk of our future offerings
reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their stock holdings
in us. The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile. Even if an active trading market develops for our common stock, the market
price of our common stock may be highly volatile and be subject to wide
fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate
and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our
common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at
or above your purchase price. We cannot assure you that the market price of our
common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. Some of
the factors that could negatively affect our stock price or result in
fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our common stock include:  
    
    actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results or distributions;
    
    changes in our funds from operations or earnings estimates or publication of research reports
about us or the real estate industry, although there can be no assurance that any research
reports about us will be published;
    
    increases in market interest rates that lead purchasers of our shares to demand a higher yield;
    
    changes in market valuations of similar companies;
    
    adverse market reaction to any increased indebtedness we incur in the future;
    
    additions or departures of key management personnel;
    
    the termination of or resignation by the Manager;
    
    actions by institutional stockholders;
    
    speculation in the press or investment community; and
    
    general market and economic conditions. Broad market fluctuations could harm the market price of our common stock. The stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations
that have affected the market price of many companies in industries similar or
related to ours and that have been unrelated to these companies operating
performances. These broad market fluctuations could reduce the market price of
our common stock. Furthermore, our operating results and prospects may be below
the expectations of public market analysts and investors or may be lower than
those of companies with comparable market capitalizations, which could harm the
market price of our common stock. 52




---



##### Table of Contents



Shares of our common stock eligible for future sale may harm our stock price. We cannot predict the effect, if any, of future sales of shares of our
common stock, or the availability of shares for future sales, on the market
price of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of these shares of
common stock, or the perception that these sales could occur, may harm
prevailing market prices for our common stock. At June 30, 2004, there are:  
    
    36,900,193 shares of outstanding common stock;  
    
    outstanding options to purchase 55,000 shares of our common stock at a
weighted-average exercise price of $14.82 per share; and  
    
    an additional 940,307 shares of our common stock available for future
awards under our stock incentive plans. A total of 940,307 shares of our common stock, or 1% of our current total
authorized shares, are reserved for future awards and grants under our stock
incentive plans. In January 2004, we filed a registration statement on Form S-8
under the Securities Act covering the 1.0 million shares of our common stock
issued or reserved for issuance under our stock incentive plans and/or subject
to outstanding options under our stock incentive plans. Shares of our common
stock issued upon exercise of options under the Form S-8 will be available for
sale in the public market, subject to Rule 144 volume limitations applicable to
affiliates and subject to the contractual restrictions described above. In
December 2003, we issued 13,110,000 shares of common stock in our initial
public offering. In March 2004, we issued 12,000,000 shares of common stock in
a public offering. All of these shares are eligible for immediate resale by
their holders. Additionally, in January 2004 we filed a registration statement
covering the resale of up to 11,500,000 shares of our common stock by the
selling stockholders named in the prospectus which is a part of such resale
registration statement. All of the shares sold from time to time pursuant to
our resale registration statement will be eligible for immediate resale by
their holders. If any or all of the above holders sell a large number of
securities in the public market, the sale could reduce the market price of our
common stock and could impede our ability to raise future capital through a
sale of additional equity securities. Changes in yields may harm the market price of our common stock. Our earnings are derived primarily from the expected positive spread
between the yield on our assets and the cost of our borrowings. This spread
will not necessarily be larger in high interest rate environments than in low
interest rate environments and may also be negative. In addition, during
periods of high interest rates, our net income and, therefore, the amount of
any distributions on our common stock, might be less attractive compared to
alternative investments of equal or lower risk. Each of these factors could
harm the market price of our common stock. Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war may affect the market for
our common stock, the industry in which we operate, and our operations and
profitability. Terrorist attacks may harm our results of operations and your investment.
We cannot assure you that there will not be further terrorist attacks against
the United States, U.S. businesses or elsewhere in the world. These attacks or
armed conflicts may impact the property underlying our mortgage-backed
securities, directly or indirectly, by undermining economic conditions in the
United States. Losses resulting from terrorist events are generally
uninsurable. 53




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Our primary component of market risk is interest rate risk, as described
below. While we do not seek to avoid risk completely, we do seek to assume risk
that can be quantified from historical experience, to actively manage that
risk, to earn sufficient compensation to justify taking those risks and to
maintain capital levels consistent with the risks we undertake or to
which we are exposed. Interest Rate Risk We are subject to interest rate risk in connection with our investments in
fixed-rate, adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed
securities and our related debt obligations, which are generally repurchase
agreements of limited duration that are periodically refinanced at current
market rates, and our derivative contracts. Effect on Net Interest Income We fund our investments in some long-term, fixed-rate and hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities with short-term borrowings under
repurchase agreements. During periods of rising interest rates, the borrowing
costs associated with those fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable rate
mortgage-backed securities tend to increase while the income earned on such
fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities (during the
fixed-rate component of such securities) may remain substantially unchanged.
This results in a narrowing of the net interest spread between the related
assets and borrowings and may result in losses. As a means to mitigate the negative impact of a rising interest rate
environment, we have entered into derivative transactions, specifically
Eurodollar futures contracts. Hedging techniques are based, in part, on assumed
levels of prepayments of our fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities. If prepayments are slower or faster than assumed,
the life of the mortgage-backed securities will be longer or shorter, which
would reduce the effectiveness of any hedging strategies we may utilize and may
result in losses on such transactions. Hedging strategies involving the use of
derivative securities are highly complex and may produce volatile returns. Our
hedging activity will also be limited by the asset and sources of income
requirements applicable to us as a REIT. Extension Risk We invest in fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed
securities. Hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities have interest
rates that are fixed for the first few years of the loantypically three, five,
seven or 10 yearsand thereafter their interest rates reset periodically on the
same basis as adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities. At June 30, 2004,
95.2% of our investment portfolio was comprised of hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities. We compute the projected weighted-average life of
our fixed-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities based on
the markets assumptions regarding the rate at which the borrowers will prepay
the underlying mortgages. In general, when a fixed-rate or hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed security is acquired with borrowings, we may,
but are not required to, enter into an interest rate swap agreement or other
hedging instrument that effectively fixes our borrowing costs for a period
close to the anticipated average life of the fixed-rate portion of the related
mortgage-backed security. This strategy is designed to protect us from rising
interest rates because the borrowing costs are fixed for the duration of the
fixed-rate portion of the related mortgage-backed security. However, if
prepayment rates decrease in a rising interest rate environment, the life of
the fixed-rate portion of the related mortgage-backed security could extend
beyond the term of the swap agreement or other hedging instrument. This
situation could negatively impact us as borrowing costs would no longer be
fixed after the end of the hedging instrument while the income earned on the
fixed-rate or hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed security would remain
fixed. This situation may also cause the market value of our fixed-rate and
hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities to decline with little or no
offsetting gain from the related hedging transactions. In certain situations,
we may be forced to sell assets and incur losses to maintain adequate
liquidity. 54




---



##### Table of Contents



Adjustable-Rate and Hybrid Adjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed Security
Interest Rate Cap Risk We also invest in adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities which are based on mortgages that are typically
subject to periodic and lifetime interest rate caps and floors, which limit the
amount by which an adjustable-rate or hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed
securitys interest yield may change during any given period. However, our
borrowing costs pursuant to our repurchase agreements will not be subject to
similar restrictions. Therefore, in a period of increasing interest rates,
interest rate costs on our borrowings could increase without limitation by
caps, while the interest-rate yields on our adjustable-rate and hybrid
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities would effectively be limited by
caps. This problem will be magnified to the extent we acquire adjustable-rate
and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities that are not based on
mortgages which are fully-indexed. In addition, the underlying mortgages may
be subject to periodic payment caps that result in some portion of the interest
being deferred and added to the principal outstanding. This could result in our
receipt of less cash income on our adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities than we need in order to pay the interest cost on
our related borrowings. These factors could lower our net interest income or
cause a net loss during periods of rising interest rates, which would
negatively impact our financial condition, cash flows and results of
operations. Interest Rate Mismatch Risk We intend to fund a substantial portion of our acquisitions of
adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities with
borrowings that have interest rates based on indices and repricing terms
similar to, but of somewhat shorter maturities than, the interest rate indices
and repricing terms of the mortgage-backed securities. Thus, we anticipate that
in most cases the interest rate indices and repricing terms of our mortgage
assets and our funding sources will not be identical, thereby creating an
interest rate mismatch between assets and liabilities. Therefore, our cost of
funds would likely rise or fall more quickly than would our earnings rate on
assets. During periods of changing interest rates, such interest rate
mismatches could negatively impact our financial condition, cash flows and
results of operations. To mitigate interest rate mismatches, we may utilize
hedging strategies discussed above. Our analysis of risks is based on managements experience, estimates,
models and assumptions. These analyses rely on models which utilize estimates
of fair value and interest rate sensitivity. Actual economic conditions or
implementation of investment decisions by our Manager may produce results that
differ significantly from our expectations. Prepayment Risk Prepayments are the full or partial repayment of principal prior to the
original term to maturity of a mortgage loan and typically occur due to
refinancing of mortgage loans. Prepayment rates for existing mortgage-backed
securities generally increase when prevailing interest rates fall below the
market rate existing when the underlying mortgages were originated. In
addition, prepayment rates on adjustable-rate and hybrid adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities generally increase when the difference between
long-term and short-term interest rates declines or becomes negative.
Prepayments of mortgage-backed securities could harm our results of operations
in several ways. Some adjustable-rate mortgages underlying our adjustable-rate
mortgage-backed securities may bear initial teaser interest rates that are
lower than their fully-indexed rates, which refers to the applicable index
rates plus a margin. In the event that such an adjustable-rate mortgage is
prepaid prior to or soon after the time of adjustment to a fully-indexed rate,
the holder of the related mortgage-backed security would have held such
security while it was less profitable and lost the opportunity to receive
interest at the fully-indexed rate over the expected life of the
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed security. Although we currently do not own any
adjustable-rate mortgage-backed securities with teaser rates, we may obtain
some in the future which would expose us to this prepayment risk. Additionally,
we currently own mortgage-backed securities that were purchased at a premium.
The prepayment of such mortgage-backed securities at a rate faster than
anticipated would result in a write-off of any remaining capitalized premium
amount and a consequent reduction of our net interest income by such amount.
Finally, in the event that we are unable to acquire new mortgage-backed
securities to replace the prepaid mortgage-backed securities, our financial
condition, cash flow and results of operations could be negatively impacted. 55




---



##### Table of Contents



Effect on Fair Value Another component of interest rate risk is the effect changes in interest
rates will have on the market value of our assets. We face the risk that the
market value of our assets will increase or decrease at different rates than
that of our liabilities, including our hedging instruments. We primarily assess our interest rate risk by estimating the duration of
our assets and the duration of our liabilities. Duration essentially measures
the market price volatility of financial instruments as interest rates change.
We generally calculate duration using various financial models and empirical
data. Different models and methodologies can produce different duration numbers
for the same securities. The following sensitivity analysis table shows at June 30, 2004, the
estimated impact on the fair value of our interest rate-sensitive investments
and repurchase agreement liabilities, assuming rates instantaneously fall 100
basis points, rise 100 basis points and rise 200 basis points: Interest Rates
    
    
    
    
    
    Interest Rates
    
    Interest RatesFall 100
    
    
    
    
    
    Rise 100
    
    Rise 200Basis Points
    
    Unchanged
    
    Basis Points
    
    Basis Points(in millions)Adjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed
SecuritiesFair value
    
    $
    150.5
    
    
    $
    148.5
    
    
    $
    144.9
    
    
    $
    143.0Change in fair value
    
    $
    2.0
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    (3.6
    )
    
    $
    (5.5
    )Change as a percent of fair value
    
    
    1.3
    %
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2.4
    )%
    
    
    (3.7
    )%Hybrid Adjustable-Rate Mortgage-Backed
SecuritiesFair value
    
    $
    4,089.1
    
    
    $
    4,012.4
    
    
    $
    3,929.6
    
    
    $
    3,880.6Change in fair value
    
    $
    76.7
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    (82.8
    )
    
    $
    (131.8
    )Change as a percent of fair value
    
    
    1.9
    %
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2.1
    )%
    
    
    (3.3
    )%Balloon Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesFair value
    
    $
    54.5
    
    
    $
    53.7
    
    
    $
    51.7
    
    
    $
    51.6Change in fair value
    
    $
    0.8
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    (2.0
    )
    
    $
    (2.1
    )Change as a percent of fair value
    
    
    1.5
    %
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (3.7
    )%
    
    
    (3.9
    )%Total Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesFair value
    
    $
    4,294.1
    
    
    $
    4,214.6
    
    
    $
    4,126.2
    
    
    $
    4,075.2Change in fair value
    
    $
    79.5
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    (88.4
    )
    
    $
    (139.4
    )Change as a percent of fair value
    
    
    1.9
    %
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (2.1
    )%
    
    
    (3.3
    )%Repurchase Agreements(1)Fair value
    
    $
    3,842.9
    
    
    $
    3,842.9
    
    
    $
    3,842.9
    
    
    $
    3,842.9Change in fair value
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Change as a percent of fair value
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Hedge InstrumentsFair value
    
    $
    (15.4
    )
    
    $
    9.2
    
    
    $
    33.8
    
    
    $
    58.5Change in fair value
    
    $
    (24.6
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    24.6
    
    
    $
    49.3Change as a percent of fair value
    
    nm
    
    
    
    
    
    nm
    
    nm-
 nm = not meaningful  (1)
    
    The fair value of the repurchase agreements would not change materially due to the short-term nature of these instruments. It is important to note that the impact of changing interest rates on fair
value can change significantly when interest rates change beyond 100 basis
points from current levels. Therefore, the volatility in the fair value of our
assets could increase significantly when interest rates change beyond 100 basis
points. In addition, other factors impact the fair value of our interest
rate-sensitive investments and hedging instruments, such as the shape of the
yield curve, market expectations as to future interest rate changes and other
market conditions. Accordingly, in the event of changes in actual interest
rates, the change in the fair value of our assets would likely differ from that
shown above, and such difference might be material and adverse to our
stockholders. 56




---



##### Table of Contents



Risk Management To the extent consistent with maintaining our status as a REIT, we seek
to manage our interest rate risk exposure to protect our portfolio of
mortgage-backed securities and related debt against the effects of major
interest rate changes. We generally seek to manage our interest rate risk by:  
    
    monitoring and adjusting, if necessary, the reset index and interest
rate related to our mortgage-backed securities and our borrowings;
    
    attempting to structure our borrowing agreements to have a range of
different maturities, terms, amortizations and interest rate
adjustment periods;
    
    using derivatives, financial futures, swaps, options, caps, floors and
forward sales, to adjust the interest rate sensitivity of our
mortgage-backed securities and our borrowings; and
    
    actively managing, on an aggregate basis, the interest rate indices,
interest rate adjustment periods, and gross reset margins of our
mortgage-backed securities and the interest rate indices and
adjustment periods of our borrowings. 
 ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES At June 30, 2004, our principal executive officer and our principal
financial officer have performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
of the Exchange Act,) and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the issuer
in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
SEC rules and forms. These officers have also concluded that there were no
changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Companys internal
control over financial reporting. 
 PART II OTHER INFORMATION 
 ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS At June 30, 2004, there were no pending legal proceedings to which we were
party or of which any of our properties were subject. 
 ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF
SECURITIES None. 
 ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES None. 57




---



##### Table of Contents



ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS We held our 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 26, 2004 at our
main offices, located at 909 Montgomery Street, Suite 500, San Francisco,
California 94133. At the annual meeting, our stockholders voted on the
following three items:  (i)
    
    Each of the following persons was elected as a Class I director, whose
terms will expire at our annual meeting of stockholders in 2007: Name
    
    For
    
    WithheldAlbert J. Gutierrez, CFA
    
    
    14,765,431
    
    
    
    111,465John McMahan
    
    
    14,766,031
    
    
    
    110,865Joseph E. Whitters, CPA
    
    
    14,772,031
    
    
    
    104,865
  The following person was elected as a Class III director, whose term will
expire at our annual meeting of stockholders in 2006: Name
    
    For
    
    WithheldDonald H. Putnam
    
    
    14,773,031
    
    
    
    103,865
  (ii)
    
    The Second Articles of Amendment and Restatement to the Amended and
Restated Articles of Incorporation was approved as follows: For
    
    Against
    
    Abstain21,819,194
    
    
    575,855
    
    
    
    56,085
  (iii)
    
    Ratification of Deloitte & Touche LLP as independent auditors for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 was approved as follows: For
    
    Against
    
    Abstain22,280,484
    
    
    129,000
    
    
    
    41,650
 
 ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION None. 
 ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (a) Exhibits The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the Signatures section
of this report) are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q. (b) Reports on Form 8-K On April 26, 2004, we filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 7, and
furnished information to the SEC on such report under Item 12, to announce the
issuance of our press release regarding our financial results for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004. The information provided on such report shall not be
deemed filed for the purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise
subject to the liabilities of that Section. 58




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. LUMINENT MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC.
(Registrant)By:
    
    /s/ GAIL P. SENECAGail P. SenecaChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date:
    
    August 9, 2004By:
    
    /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZYDAChristopher J. ZydaChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Date:
    
    August 9, 2004
 59




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX Pursuant to Item 601(a)(2) of Regulation S-K, this exhibit index
immediately precedes the exhibits. The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K. ExhibitNumber
    
    Description3.1
    
    Articles of Amendment and Restatement (1)3.2
    
    Articles Supplementary (2)3.3*
    
    Second Articles of Amendment and
Restatement3.4
    
    Amended and Restated Bylaws (1)3.5
    
    Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (1)4.1
    
    Form of Common Stock Certificate (1)4.2
    
    Registration Rights Agreement,
dated as of June 11, 2003, by and between the Registrant and Friedman,
Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc. (for itself and for the benefit of the holders from time to time of
registrable securities issued in the Registrants June 2003 private offering) (1)31.1*
    
    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Gail P. Seneca, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant31.2*
    
    Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Christopher J. Zyda, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant32.1*
    
    Section 1350 Certification of Gail P. Seneca, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant32.2*
    
    Section 1350 Certification of Christopher J. Zyda, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant
  (1)
    
    Incorporated by reference from our Registration Statement on Form S-11 (Registration No. 333-107984) which became effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, on
December 18, 2003.(2)
    
    Incorporated by reference from our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 23, 2003.*
    
    Filed herewith. 60