alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,464
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,464)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7436

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. RONALD COLLINS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Beckley

. Irene C. Berger , District Judge. ( 5:18

- cr - 00068

- 1 ; 5:22

- cv - 00161 )

Submitted : August 29, 2023 Decided: August 31, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Ronald Collins, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7436 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Ronald Collins, Jr. , seeks to appeal the district court’s o rder accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on Collins’ 28 U.S.C. § 225 5
motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certi ficate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonabl e jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. Davis , 580 U.S. 100, 115

- 17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must
demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Collins has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability , deny Collins’ motions for abeyance, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument becaus e the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7436 Doc: 17 Filed: 08/31/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 55925.

protests 155400-K, etc. (Detroit).

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Ppinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of keys which are, in fact, parts of agricultural implements, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1604 was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**





**ESSEX
      PORTFOLIO, L.P** **.**


**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**








Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), I, Keith R. Guericke,
      Principal Executive Officer, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that
      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Form
      10-Q”) of Essex Portfolio, L.P. fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended, and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Essex
      Portfolio, L.P. at the dates of and for the periods presented.











Date:
      August 7, 2006     /s/
      Keith R. Guericke


Keith
      R. Guericke


Chief
      Executive Officer and President,


Director
      and Vice Chairman of the Board,


Essex
      Property Trust, Inc., general partner of


Essex
      Portfolio, L.P.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3946 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
#### George A. STATEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-1114.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 18, 2001.

George A. Staten, pro se. Fenita Morris Shepard, Office of the United States Attorney, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

George A. Staten appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint, in which he sought a refund of all taxes paid into the Social Security system. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Suits of this type are expressly prohibited under 42 U.S.C.A. § 405(h) (West2000).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 Moreover, even assuming Staten could bring this action, the Internal Revenue Service, which collects Social Security taxes, would be the proper Defendant, not the Social Security Administration.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6479

TALIB D. SHABAZZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HAMLETT, Lieutenant; SHIFLETT, Unit Manager;

SUSSEX II STATE PRISON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CA-03-192-3)

Submitted: June 18, 2004 Decided: July 16, 2004

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Talib D. Shabazz, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Talib D. Shabazz appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Shabazz v.

Hamlett, No. CA-03-192-3 (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 43 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay adjustments 

for Members of Congress. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2023 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. HAWLEY) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the provision of law that provides automatic pay 

adjustments for Members of Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS FOR MEMBERS OF CONGRESS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 601(a) 

6 of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 (2 U.S.C. 

7 4501) is repealed. 

8 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

9 Section 601(a) of such Act (2 U.S.C. 4501) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting ‘‘(a)’’; 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 43 IS

1 (2) by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), 

2 and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), respectively; 

3 and 

4 (3) by striking ‘‘as adjusted by paragraph (2) 

5 of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘adjusted as pro6 vided by law’’. 

7 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section and the amend8 ments made by this section shall take effect on the date 

9 on which the 119th Congress convenes. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 23.2.d

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-18139 and 333-108215 of Kansas City Power & Light Company on Forms S-3 of our report dated January 30, 2002 (relating to the financial statements of DTI Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the "Company") not presented separately herein and which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the Company's filing for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code, substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern and an impairment charge recorded by the Company), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Kansas City Power & Light Company for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
Case 2:02-cv-04451-CG Document 23 Filed 10/30/2003 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04451-CG Document 23 Filed 10/30/2003 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04451-CG Document 23 Filed 10/30/2003 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04451-CG Document 23 Filed 10/30/2003 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04451-CG Document 23 Filed 10/30/2003 Page 5 of 5
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 33-8506 on Form S-8 effective September 25,
1986 in Registration Statement No. 33-25931 on Form S-8
effective December 28, 1988 in Registration Statement No. 33-
29493 on Form S-8 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment No.
1 effective December 22, 1989; in Registration Statement No.
33-32783 on Form S-8 effective January 11, 1990; in
Registration Statement No. 2-72249 on Form S-3 as amended by
Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Form S-16 effective
January 17, 1990; in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to
Registration Statement No. 33-6880 on Form S-8 effective
April 9, 1990; in Registration Statement No. 33-32783 on
Form S-8 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. I
effective April 9, 1990; in Registration Statement No. 33-
47680 on Form S-8 effective May 5, 1992 in Registration
Statement 2-72249 on Form S-3 as amended by Post-Effective
Amendment No. 4 to Form S-16 effective April 7, 1994; in
Registration Statement No. 33-80800 on Form S-8 effective
June 28, 1994; in Registration Statement No. 33-29493 on
Form S-8 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 2
effective September 27, 1994; in Registration Statement No.
33-62671 on Form S-8 effective September 15, 1995; in
Registration Statement No. 33-62669 on Form S-8 effective
September 15, 1995; and in Registration Statement No. 333-
26197 on Form S-8 effective April 30, 1997 by Irwin
Financial Corporation of our report, dated January 21, 1998
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of Irwin Financial Corporation
as of December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Indianapolis, Indiana
March 26, 1998
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105·3901
OFFICE OF THE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR 

### MAY 1 3 

### 2010
The Honorable Dr. Clinton Pattea Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation P.O. Box 17779 Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 Dear President Pattea: The purpose ofthis letter is to infonn you that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) intends to designate the lands ofthe Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation as "unclassifiable/attainment" for the 2006 24-hour fine particle (PM2 .5

) national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). On October 14,2009,mypredecessor, LauraYoshii, sent you a letternotifying you that, based on 2006-2008 air quality data, Pinal County, Arizona was newly violating the 2006 24­ hourPM2 .5NAAQS. Because your reservation is located in an adjacent county with emissions that could potentially contribute to violations in Pinal County, she also notified you ofEPA's decision to defer the designation for Pinal County, as well as eight surrounding counties 1
, for the 2006 24-hour PM2 .5NAAQS so that EPA could collect and evaluate additional infonnation before promulgating designations for these counties and the tribal lands within them. Now that we have assessed the air quality data in Pinal County and the surrounding area, I am writing to notify you ofour intention to designate a portion ofPinal County as "nonattainment" for the 2006 24-hourPM2 .5NAAQS; however, EPA intends to designate the surrounding counties and the tribal lands within them as ''unclassifiable/attainment'' for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. The enclosed analysis ofPinal County and the surrounding area serves as the basis for EPA's intended designations. Should you have additional infonnation that you wish to be consideredbyEPA in this process, please provide it to us byJune 18,2010, as we intend to make final designation decisions for the 2006 24-hourPM2 .5NAAQS in August 2010.

1 The additional counties for which EPA deferred designation are Cochise County, Gila County, Graham County, La Paz County, Maricopa County, Pima County, Yavapai County, and Yuma County. See the Federal Register notice for final 24-hourPM2.5designations, at: www.epa.gov/pmdesignations/?006standards/regs.htm#3
.

Printed on Recycled PaperWe look forward to continuing to work with you and your staffto ensure a healthy environment. Should you or your air quality staffhave any questions, please contact Colleen McKaughan, Associate Air Division Director at 520-498-0118. Sincerely,

Jar Blumenfeld Regional Administrator
Enclosure cc: Mark Frank, Acting Environmental Manager
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 3/21/2023 1

State-Court Loss as Res Judicata 

Kowalski v. Cook County Officers’ Electoral Board 

(John W. Darrah, N.D. Ill. 1:16-cv-1891) 

The federal district judge denied relief to a prospective candidate for 

county recorder of deeds as barred by res judicata and unsuccessful 

efforts in state courts. 

Subject: Getting on the ballot. Topics: Getting on the ballot; 

matters for state courts; pro se party; primary election. 

A prospective candidate for Cook County’s recorder of deeds filed a pro se 

federal complaint on February 2, 2016, in the Northern District of Illinois 

seeking damages and other relief for her exclusion from the March 15 primary-election ballot.1

 On the following day, the plaintiff filed a motion for a 

temporary restraining order putting her on the ballot.2

An attorney appeared on behalf of the plaintiff on February 9,3

 and Judge 

John W. Darrah granted him permission to file an amended complaint on February 16.4

 The amended complaint added a voter as a plaintiff.5

On March 1, Judge Darrah denied the plaintiffs immediate relief; res judicata barred relief in conflict with earlier state-court rulings.6

 Following additional briefing, Judge Darrah dismissed the case on res judicata grounds on 

September 13.7

1. Complaint, Kowalski v. Cook Cty. Officers’ Electoral Bd., No. 1:16-cv-1891 (N.D. Ill. 

Feb. 2, 2016), D.E. 1. 

2. Temporary-Restraining-Order Motion, id. (Feb. 3, 2016), D.E. 7; see Emergency Notice 

of Motion, id. (Feb. 3, 2016), D.E. 8 (specifying a hearing date of February 9, 2016). 

3. Attorney Appearance, id. (Feb. 9, 2016), D.E. 14. 

4. Order, id. (Feb. 16, 2016), D.E. 21. 

Judge Darrah died on March 23, 2017. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of 

Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

5. Amended Complaint, Kowalski, No. 1:16-cv-1891 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 16, 2016), D.E. 23. 

6. Opinion, id. (Mar. 1, 2016), D.E. 29, 2016 WL 792333; Order, id. (Mar. 1, 2016), D.E. 

28; see Minutes, id. (Mar. 11, 2016), D.E. 35 (denying reconsideration). 

7. Opinion, id. (Sept. 13, 2016), D.E. 54, 2016 WL 4765711.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 32
                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS


In connection with the Annual Report of Corus Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
J. Glickman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Corus Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Corus Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



March 12, 2004                                      /s/ ROBERT J. GLICKMAN
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Robert J. Glickman
                                                    Chief Executive Officer



In connection with the Annual Report of Corus Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Tim H.
Taylor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Corus Bankshares, Inc. and will be retained by Corus Bankshares,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



March 12, 2004                                      /s/ TIM H. TAYLOR
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Tim. H. Taylor
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2010 - 0515 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM196AD

670SH - 78 -029 --- 7/3/08 670SH - 78 -029, RB --- 11/25/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                      16,307,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               42,223,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   692,000
<INVENTORY>                                 71,477,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           135,240,000
<PP&E>                                      44,599,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,548,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             190,315,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       40,602,000
<BONDS>                                      7,695,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 120,708,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               190,315,000
<SALES>                                    189,147,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           189,147,000
<CGS>                                      143,018,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              143,018,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (52,000)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             242,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             17,048,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,712,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         11,336,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,336,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .57


</TABLE>
Order entered July 1, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01521
- CV
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY AND AETNA H EALTH INC., Appellant s V.
KINDRED HOSPITALS LI MITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A K INDREND HOSPITAL

HOUSTON MEDICAL CENT ER , Appellee s On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 16
- 13831



### O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal which we first abated on March 12, 2019 to allo w the parties an opportunity to mediate

. At the time, appellee’s brief was due to be filed. Before the Court is the parties’ June 26, 2019 joint status report and motion to continue
abatement . T he parties i nform the Court they have settled their dispute , but request the abatement be continued until September 6, 2019 to allow them time to finalize the agreement

. We GRANT the motion to continue and ORDER either a motion to dismiss the appeal or appellees’ brief be filed no later than September 6, 2019.
We a gain ABATE the appeal. The appeal will be reinstated no later than September 9,
2019.
/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE