alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Michael L. Sheriff, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on form 10-KSB of the X-Change
Corporation, Inc. (the "Company").

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in exchange act rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: April 5, 2007
/S/ Michael L. Sheriff
Michael L. Sheriff
C.E.O., President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 58546.

protest 224423-K (New York).

#### M. Farris & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest -was overruled.
In the

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-23-00060-CR

GREGORY LYNN GRIMES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 114th District Court

Smith County, Texas

Trial Court No. 114-0474-19

Before Stevens, C.J., van Cleef and Rambin, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Stevens
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Gregory Lynn Grimes has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal.1 The motion 

was signed by both Grimes and his appellate counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). As authorized by Rule 

42.2(a), we grant the motion. See id.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal.

Scott E. Stevens

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: June 19, 2023

Date Decided: June 20, 2023

Do Not Publish

1Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme 

Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001.
Before the First Division,

June 15, 1956

No. 60056.

#### Olivier Straw Goods Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 190099-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas W. Perry, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Merrill Lynch
& Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ THOMAS W. PERRY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Thomas W. Perry*
                              Title:   Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
                                       Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 14, 2009
-----------------------

*  Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARK PAYNE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-04-1585 MCE KJM P

vs.

MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 8, 2010 defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. On July

14, 2010, plaintiff was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the

motion within thirty days. In the same order, plaintiff was informed that failure to file an

opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).1

 The thirty day period has now expired and plaintiff has not responded to the

court’s order. 

/////

1

 Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the July 14, 2010 order was

returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court

apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents

at the record address of the party is fully effective.

1

Case 2:04-cv-01585-MCE -KJM Document 108 Filed 08/25/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be

dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twentyone days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the

objections shall be filed and served within seven days after service of the objections. The parties

are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal

the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: August 25, 2010. 

1

payn1585.41

2

Case 2:04-cv-01585-MCE -KJM Document 108 Filed 08/25/10 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the “Company”)
      hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




(i)  the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
      June
      30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended (subject to the Company's position prevailing in regard to the
      remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more fully described in the Report);
      and




(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      August 9, 2007




BY:/s/
      Thomas J. Stirnweis


(Signature)


THOMAS
      J.
      STIRNWEIS


Vice
      President, Treasurer and


Chief
      Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.
KENNETH SMITH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3577

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 6, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

William E. Davis, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Barbara J. Busharis, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., SWANSON, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
No. 52238.

protest 94151-K (New York).

#### V. Casazza & Bro. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall J.

On rehearing no evidence was produced and the case was submitted upon the record as originally made. In *Morales & Co. Sucs*v. *291*United States*(54 Treas. Dec. 425, T. D. 43062) it was held that the inspector's official report to the collector is presumptively correct. In the absence of direct evidence contradicting the inspector’s report in this case it was found that the original decision reported in Abstract 50590 should be and the same is herebv adhered to.
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-114065 on Form S-3 of our report dated March 2, 2005(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption on January 1, 2003 ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”) relating to the financialstatements and financial statement schedule of Interstate Power and Light Company, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K ofInterstate Power and Light Company for the year ended December 31, 2004.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

March 2, 2005
Exhibit 31(a)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert Chestnov, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jaclyn, Inc.;

2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 28, 2006            /s/ ROBERT CHESTNOV
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Robert Chestnov, Principal Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q of Internet Security Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) for theperiod ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the ChiefExecutive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board of the Company,certifies that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ THOMAS E. NOONAN    |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Thomas E. Noonan        |
| Chairman, President and |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

November 9, 2005

----
(Reap. Dec. 9477)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 4023; 2842.

(Decided June 23, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doul>,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

Counsel for the parties, have submitted the above-entitled appeals for reappraisement upon a stipulation on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved, and that such value, in each instance, was the invoice unit values, packed, less ocean freight and insurance or any other charges as are noted by the appraiser on the invoices as nondutiable.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 63087.

#### Air Express International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/11245 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2

ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.
                     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Schall, Chief Financial Officer of Essex Property Trust,
Inc., the general partner of the registrant Essex Portfolio, L.P., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Essex Portfolio,
L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

1. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
2. The general partner's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
3. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
4. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
5. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

1. The general partner's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the general partner's auditors and the audit committee of the
general partner's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

May 17, 2004

By: /s/ MICHAEL J. SCHALL

Michael J. Schall
                  Chief Financial Officer
                  Essex Property Trust, Inc., general partner of
                  Essex Portfolio, L.P.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TINA M. EQUELS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1567 FCD KJM P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed August 5, 2004, plaintiff was given leave to file an amended civil

action and application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the application filing fee. Plaintiff has

not responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01567-FCD-KJM Document 2 Filed 06/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 29, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

eque1567.fta

Case 2:04-cv-01567-FCD-KJM Document 2 Filed 06/30/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas America Public #12-2003 Limited
Partnership (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      14, 2009