alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32 (b)


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q"), I, Gary Jones, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

      (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d));
      and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




DATE: 8-13-03


/s/  GARY S. JONES
------------------------------
Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- WILKE,FLEURY, HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SACRAMENTO ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY (Case No. S-04-1358 WBS/GGH)

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 

WILLIAM A. GOULD, JR. (SBN 035446) 

DANIEL L. BAXTER (SBN 203862) 

400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 441-2430 

Facsimile: (916) 442-6664 

Attorneys for All Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES P. DeFAZIO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOLLISTER, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. S-04-1358 WBS/GGH 

(Consolidated Action Master File Number) 

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE FOR OUTOF-TOWN COUNSEL TO APPEAR 

TELEPHONICALLY AT DECEMBER 3, 

2007 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) 

CONFERENCE 

KATHLEEN ELLIS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOLLISTER, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

BRENDA DIMARO; and HALLIE 

LAVICK, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HOLLISTER, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 295 Filed 11/08/07 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- WILKE,FLEURY, HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SACRAMENTO ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY (Case No. S-04-1358 WBS/GGH)

Upon reviewing and considering Defendants’ ex parte application for leave for out-oftown counsel to appear telephonically at the December 3, 2007 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 

Conference (“Application”), and good cause having been shown, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Defendants’ Application is hereby GRANTED, and 

that attorneys Michael B. Roche, L. Andrew Brehm, James D. Adducci, and James W. Ducayet 

are hereby permitted to appear telephonically at the forthcoming Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 

Conference in the above-entitled consolidated matters, currently scheduled for December 3, 2007, 

at 2:00 p.m. Said counsel shall be available at the telephone numbers listed in Defendants’ 

Application. 

DATED: November 7, 2007 

320122.1 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 295 Filed 11/08/07 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4174 

To amend title IV of the Public Health Service Act to direct the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services to establish a clearinghouse on intellectual 

disabilities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2024 

Mr. SCHMITT (for himself and Mr. OSSOFF) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend title IV of the Public Health Service Act to 

direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

establish a clearinghouse on intellectual disabilities, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Think Differently 

5 Database Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4174 IS

1 SEC. 2. CLEARINGHOUSE ON INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES. 

2 Subpart 7 of part C of title IV of the Public Health 

3 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 285g et seq.) is amended by insert4 ing after section 450 (42 U.S.C. 285g–2) the following: 

5 ‘‘SEC. 450A. CLEARINGHOUSE ON INTELLECTUAL DISABIL6 ITIES. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary, in consultation 

8 with the Director of NIH and the Director of the Insti9 tute, shall establish within the Department of Health and 

10 Human Services, a publicly available clearinghouse to pro11 vide information with respect to resources and information 

12 for people with an intellectual disability and the caregivers 

13 and families of such people. Such clearinghouse shall in14 clude— 

15 ‘‘(1) information on individual community-based 

16 services and long-term support services available to 

17 individuals eligible for medical assistance under a 

18 State plan under the Medicaid program under title 

19 XIX of the Social Security Act (or a waiver of such 

20 plan); 

21 ‘‘(2) information on how to obtain health care, 

22 mental health care, and other relevant services; and 

23 ‘‘(3) a searchable database of such resources 

24 that may be searched by postal ZIP Code. 

25 ‘‘(b) PROMOTION.—The Secretary shall, as applicable 

26 and appropriate, identify and disseminate promotional acVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:52 May 10, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4174.IS S4174

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4174 IS

1 tivities to improve, among people with an intellectual dis2 ability and the caretakers and families of such people, the 

3 awareness of the resources included in the clearinghouse 

4 established under subsection (a). 

5 ‘‘(c) MODEL.—In establishing the clearinghouse 

6 under this section, the Secretary may use the website 

7 thinkdifferently.net as a model.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
i i i i i i



### MEM ORA ND UM OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 82 3- CR Roge rs A. ADAM S a/k/ a Rog e r A da ms , Appellant
v . The STA TE of Texas, Appellee Fr om the 227th J udicial District Court, Be x ar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2007-CR- 1146 Honora ble Phili p A. Kazen, Judge Presiding PER C URI AM Sitt ing: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Steven C. Hilbig, Just ice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: J anuar y 14, 2009 DI SMI SSED Appellant Rog ers A. Adams a/k/a Rog er A dams pleade d nolo contender e to the cha rg e of manslaug hter pursua

nt to a plea ba

rg ain ag ree ment. As part of his plea- barg ain, appe llant signe d a
se pa rate “ Wai ve r of Ap pe a l.” Th e tr ia l cou rt imp os e d s e nte nc e a nd

sig ne d a c e rt if ic a te sta tin g “ thi s is a plea- barg ain ca se, and the defe ndant has NO rig ht of appe al” a nd “the defe ndant has wa ived the rig ht of appe al.” See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(a)( 2). Appe llant timely filed a notice of appe al. The04
- 08
- 00 82 3- CR

- 2- cler k’s re cord, w hich includes the ple a bar g ain ag ree ment and the tri al co u rt ’s R ule 25.2(a )(2)
cer tificatio n, has bee n filed. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d). This court must dismi ss an appe al “if a
cer tification that shows the def endant ha s the rig ht of appe al has not be en made part of the rec ord.” Id. The court g ave a

ppellant notice that the a

ppeal would be dismiss ed unless an a mended tria l
c ou rt c e rt if

ic a tio n sh ow ing he ha s the ri g ht to a pp e a l w e re ma de pa

rt of the a pp e lla te re c or d w ith in thirty day s. See T EX . R. A PP . P
. 25.2 (d ); 37 .1 ; Da nie ls v . S tat e , 110 S.W .3d 174 (Tex. App.–San Antonio 2003, order) , dis

p. on me rit

s , No. 04 -0 3- 00 17 6- CR, 20 03 WL 21 50 83 47 (Jul y 2, 20 03 , p e t. ref ’d) (not desig nated for publication). Appellant’s appointed appellate counsel fi l ed a written response , she has r eviewe d the re cord a nd can find no rig ht of appea l. After r eviewing the re cord and counsel’s notice, we ag ree that appellant does not ha ve a rig ht to a

ppeal. Se e De ar

s v . S tat e , 154 S.W. 3d 61 0 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 20 05 ) ( ho ldi ng tha t c ou rt of a

pp e a ls s ho uld

re vie w c le rk ’s re c or d to deter mine whether

trial court’ s cer

tification is acc urate ). We there fore dismiss this appea l. T EX . R. A PP . P. 25.2(d).

PER C URI AM Do no t pu bli sh
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAVIER RAIGOZA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1208 GEB KJM

vs.

ARAMARK CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Defendants’ motion to compel deposition of plaintiff came on shortened time for

hearing on July 29, 2005. Randy Andrus appeared telephonically for plaintiff. Mona Badani

appeared telephonically for defendants. Upon review of the documents in support and

opposition, upon hearing from counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT

ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. The deposition of plaintiff shall be taken on August 4, 2005 in the Robert T.

Matsui United States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California commencing at 9:30 a.m.;

counsel and the deponent shall report beforehand to Courtroom No. 26 on Eighth Floor. Plaintiff

shall not attend the deposition of any other deponent prior to the completion of plaintiff’s

deposition.

2. Other depositions previously noticed by defendants shall take place on August

2, 3, 5, 8, 11, 15, 16, 17, 18, 23 and 26, subject to the limit of a total of 70 hours previously set

Case 2:04-cv-01208-GEB -KJM Document 51 Filed 08/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

by the court, with the exact dates to be determined by counsel based on the availability of the

deponents. No right of priority in scheduling the depositions exists based on the date of their

notice. Depositions shall be coordinated so that deponents in similar locales will be deposed on

the same day or consecutive days. Ms. Badani shall be the sole contact for defendants for the

purpose of setting a schedule for the depositions. 

DATED: July 29, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

006 raigoza2.oah

Case 2:04-cv-01208-GEB -KJM Document 51 Filed 08/01/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 58545.

protest 184832-K (Ogdensburg).

#### Atlas Converting Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the collector’s classification, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 23(b), Form 10-K
                                                  Kansas City Life
                                                  Insurance Company

                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  2-97351)  pertaining  to the Savings and Profit  Sharing Plan of Kansas
City Life  Insurance  Company of our report dated February 24, 1999 with respect
to the  financial  statements  and  schedules of the Kansas City Life  Insurance
Company  Savings and Profit  Sharing  Plan  included in the Annual  Report (Form
11-K) for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                     /s/Ernst & Young LLP

Kansas City, Missouri
March 26, 1999
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4311 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4311

   To limit funds to the United Nations and other organizations that 
provide any status, rights, or privileges beyond observer status to the 
       Palestine Liberation Organization, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 9, 2024

Mr. Risch (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Graham, Mr. Cassidy, Mr. Lee, 
   Mr. Cotton, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Daines, Mr. Ricketts, Mr. Crapo, Mr. 
   Hagerty, Mr. Cruz, Mrs. Fischer, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Young, Mr. 
 Romney, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Scott of Florida, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Tillis, Mr. 
Rubio, Mr. Tuberville, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Mullin) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                          on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To limit funds to the United Nations and other organizations that 
provide any status, rights, or privileges beyond observer status to the 
       Palestine Liberation Organization, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Official Palestine Entry Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO MEMBERSHIP OF PALESTINE LIBERATION 
              ORGANIZATION IN UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES.

    Section 414(a) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1990 and 1991 (22 U.S.C. 287e note; Public Law 101-246) is 
amended by striking ``the same standing as member states'' and 
inserting ``any status, rights, or privileges beyond observer status''.

SEC. 3. AMENDMENTS TO LIMITATIONS ON CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE UNITED 
              NATIONS AND AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS.

    Section 410 of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal 
Years 1994 and 1995 (22 U.S.C. 287e note; Public Law 103-236) is 
amended by striking ``full membership'' each place it appears and 
inserting ``any status, rights, or privileges beyond observer status''.

SEC. 4. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing is this Act shall be construed to apply to Taiwan.
                                 <all>
```
No. 6432.

#### LOUISIANA MEADOWS COMPANY vs. COMMERCIAL SECURITY COMPANY, LIMITED.

Appeal from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “C.” No. 108,503. Honorable E. K. Skinner, Judge.

Poster, Milling, Brian & Saal, for plaintiff and appellee.

Stafford & Robinson, for defendant and appellant.

On Rehearing,

His Honor, JOHN ST. PAUL,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

A reconsideration of this case leads us to the conclusion that there was no error therein.

On the contrary, our conclusions are only strengthened .by a reading of Section 3 of Act 140 of 1890, identical with Section 67 of Act 170 of 1898, which is as follows:

> ‘ That no assessment or tax sale shall be set aside or annulled for any error in description or measurement of the property assessed, in the name of the owner, provided the property assessed or sold can be reasonably identified.”

*28Opinion and decree, November 8th, 1915.

Writ denied, December 14th, 1915.

For original opinion see Book XII, folio 415.

We have no donbt whatever about the identity of the property assessed and sold, or intended to be assessed and sold, (Sec. 4 of Act 140 of 1890) and the same was ■assessed “in the name of the owner.” .

It is therefore ordered that our former decree be reinstated and made the final judgment of the Court.
No. 56398.

protests 509771-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### The American Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80719-80720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25605]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-11549-01-R6]

Underground Injection Control Program; Hazardous Waste Injection 
Restrictions; Petition for Exemption Issuance--Class I Hazardous Waste 
Injection; Rubicon LLC, Geismar Louisiana Facility, Louisiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of a final decision on a no migration petition issuance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that an issuance of an exemption to the 
land disposal restrictions, under the 1984 Hazardous and Solid Waste 
Amendments to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, is

[[Page 80720]]

granted to Rubicon LLC for one Class I hazardous waste injection well 
at the Geismar Louisiana Facility located in Geismar, Louisiana.

DATES: This action was effective as of November 6, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the petition issuance and pertinent information 
relating thereto are on file at the following location: Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA), Region 6, Water Division, Safe Drinking Water 
Branch (6WD-D), 1201 Elm Street, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75270-2102.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian Ussery, Physical Scientist, Ground 
Water/UIC Section, EPA--Region 6, telephone (214) 665-6639.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As required by 40 CFR part 148, Rubicon LLC 
adequately demonstrated to the EPA by the petition issuance application 
and supporting documentation that, to a reasonable degree of certainty, 
there will be no migration of hazardous constituents from the injection 
zone for as long as the waste remains hazardous. This final decision 
allows the underground injection by the Geismar Louisiana Facility, of 
the specific restricted hazardous wastes identified in this exemption 
issuance, into Class I hazardous waste injection Well WDW-6 until 
December 31, 2040, unless EPA terminates this exemption under 
provisions of 40 CFR 148.24. Additional conditions included in this 
final decision may be reviewed by contacting the Region 6 Ground Water/
UIC Section. As required by 40 CFR 148.22(b) and 124.10, a public 
notice comment period started on April 6, 2023, and closed on May 22, 
2023. No comments were received. EPA made significant edits to the fact 
sheet after the public comment period including naming the petition an 
issuance instead of a reissuance and clarifying portions of the geology 
section. A second comment period was started on September 7th, 2023, 
and closed on October 23rd, 2023. No comments were received. This 
decision constitutes final Agency action, and there is no 
Administrative appeal.

    Dated: November 14, 2023.
Dzung Kim Ngo Kidd,
Acting Director, Water Division, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2023-25605 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
No. 6593.

#### STATE, EX REL., ANTOINE HAYDEL vs. DEMOCRATIC PARISH EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, ET ALS.

Appeal from the 28th Judicial District ’Court, Parish of St. John the Baptist, No. 483. Honorable John E. Eleury, Judge.

Guión, Lambremont and Chenet, for plaintiff and appellant.

P. E. Edrington, Jr., L.M. Reynaud, for defendant and appellee.

Per Curiam.

This case presents the same question involved in the matter of State, ex rel., Elfer vs. Parish Democratic Exec*271utive Committee, et als., No. 6590 of our docket, this day decided, and for the reasons therein set forth,

Opinion and decree, December 22nd, 1915.

The judgment herein is annulled and reversed and it is now decreed that there be judgment in favor of relator herein ordering and commanding the respondents herein to print and cause to be printed the name of relator upon all ballots, to be used .and cast at the primary election to be held in the Parish of St. John the Baptist on January 25, 1916, as a candidate of the Democratic Party for’ nomination to the office of Police Juror, Ward 1, of said Parish, and to certify relator’s name as such candidate to the Secretary of State of Louisiana; and it is further decreed that respondents pay the costs of both Courts.

Reversed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary 

The following Agreements were filed with the Department of Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation Act, as amended  (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 days after the filing of the application. 

*Docket Number:*                     OST-2006-26768.                 

*Date Filed:*                     December 28, 2006.                 

*Parties:*                     Members of the International Air Transport Association.                 

*Subject:*

Mail Vote 525—Resolution 010i, 

TC23/123 Europe-Japan Korea, 

Special Passenger Amending Resolution from Korea (Rep. of) to Europe. 

Intended effective date: 15 January 2007. 

Barbara J. Hairston, 

Supervisory Docket Officer, Docket Operations, Alternate Federal Register Liaison.

 [FR Doc. E7-360 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Benny Dean Bartee, Sr.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0965 DFL PAN P

vs.

Stephen Kennedy, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 31, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-00965-DFL-PAN Document 11 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 31, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed.

DATED: 11/11/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00965-DFL-PAN Document 11 Filed 11/14/05 Page 2 of 2