alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Curtis Wilson,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1105 LKK PAN P

vs.

California Department of Corrections,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 30, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

Case 2:04-cv-01105-LKK -PAN Document 7 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 30, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: September 2, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01105-LKK -PAN Document 7 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAFAR AFSHAR,

NO. CIV. S-04-1088 LKK/JFM

Plaintiff,

v.

O R D E R

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO

POLICE DEPARTMENT; COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; and SHERIFF

LOU BLANAS, individually and in his

official capacity as Sheriff of the

Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department,

Defendants.

 /

On May 17, 2006, the court issued an order continuing oral

argument on both a motion to strike and a motion to amend the

scheduling order. The motions are currently scheduled to be heard

on the June 12, 2006 law and motion calendar. The court is aware

that the Pretrial Conference is currently set for June 5, 2006 at

2:30 p.m. No trial date has been set. 

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01088-LKK -JFM Document 117 Filed 05/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Given the pending motions, the Pretrial Conference is

CONTINUED to July 10, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. At that conference, the

trial date will be set. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: May 22, 2006.

 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01088-LKK -JFM Document 117 Filed 05/23/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1225 LKK GGH P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On October 26, 2005, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s

August 24, 2005 request for a court appointed qualified medical examiner. On November 7,

2005, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 72-303(b), states

“rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court

within ten court days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties.” E.D. Local Rule

72-303(b). Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order of October 26,

2005 is therefore untimely.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s November 7, 2005

request for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: January 11, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/wood1225.851

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 55 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 21


              SUBSIDIARIES OF INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION

         The following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries as of March 5,
2001, except for unnamed subsidiaries which, considered in the aggregate as a
single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

                                                                 JURISDICTION
                                                                      OF
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                               INCORPORATION
------------------                                               -------------

Fantasia Confections, Inc.                                       California
Multifoods Bakery Distributors, Inc.                             Delaware
Multifoods Bakery International, Inc.                            Delaware
         Inversiones 91060, C.A.                                 Venezuela
Multifoods Distribution Management, Inc.                         Delaware
         Better Brands, Inc.                                     Delaware
         Multifoods Distribution Group, Inc.                     Colorado
               Multifoods Merchandising, Inc.                    Delaware
Robin Hood Multifoods Inc.                                       Ontario
         Multifoods Ltd.                                         Ontario
         985079 Ontario Inc.                                     Ontario
               Gourmet Baker Inc.                                Ontario
         980964 Ontario Limited                                  Ontario
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANNE NELSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1103 DFL KJM PS

vs.

PLACER COUNTY, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

This action was referred to the undersigned based on Local Rule 72-302(c)(21). 

Currently calendared for hearing on January 18, 2006 is defendants’ motion for summary

judgment. Plaintiff has requested additional time to file further opposition and defense counsel

has indicated he is unavailable on the date of the hearing. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The hearing date of January 18, 2006 is vacated. Hearing on defendants’

motion for summary judgment is continued to February 22, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no.

26.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01103-DFL -KJM Document 104 Filed 01/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Plaintiff shall file further opposition, if any, to the motion for summary

judgment no later than February 8, 2006. 

DATED: January 12, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

nelson.con

Case 2:04-cv-01103-DFL -KJM Document 104 Filed 01/13/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12.1
 IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Year Ended December 31,(In Thousands)
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Including Interest on DepositsEarnings:Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes
    
    $
    (361,465
    )
    
    $
    (29,183
    )
    
    $
    56,271
    
    
    $
    56,842
    
    
    $
    80,216Fixed charges from below
    
    
    212,353
    
    
    
    250,636
    
    
    
    242,089
    
    
    
    137,121
    
    
    
    80,137Earnings from continuing operations
    
    $
    (149,112
    )
    
    $
    221,453
    
    
    $
    298,360
    
    
    $
    193,963
    
    
    $
    160,353Fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    $
    212,353
    
    
    $
    250,636
    
    
    $
    242,089
    
    
    $
    137,121
    
    
    $
    80,137Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    (0.70
    )x
    
    
    0.88
    x

    
    
    1.23
    x

    
    
    1.41
    x

    
    
    2.00
    xExcluding Interest on DepositsEarnings:Earnings from continuing
operations before income taxes
    
    $
    (361,465
    )
    
    $
    (29,183
    )
    
    $
    56,271
    
    
    $
    56,842
    
    
    $
    80,216Fixed charges from below
    
    
    109,841
    
    
    
    113,276
    
    
    
    109,868
    
    
    
    53,260
    
    
    
    35,650Earnings from continuing operations
    
    $
    (251,624
    )
    
    $
    84,093
    
    
    $
    166,139
    
    
    $
    110,102
    
    
    $
    115,866Fixed charges:Interest expense, excluding
interest on deposits
    
    $
    109,841
    
    
    $
    113,276
    
    
    $
    109,868
    
    
    $
    53,260
    
    
    $
    35,650Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    (2.29
    )x

    
    
    0.74
    x

    
    
    1.51
    x

    
    
    2.07
    x

    
    
    3.25
    x
09.08 Recover a Batch
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:October16,
                2006
            By:
            */s/
              Jay P. Nash*Name:Jay
                P. NashTitle:Chief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Amendment No. 1 to Capital Support Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.4 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 CAPITAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Capital Support Agreement, is made as of the 15th day of July 2008, by and between NORTHERN
TRUST CORPORATION (the “Support Provider”) and NORTHERN FUNDS (the “Trust”), on behalf of its series the Money Market Fund (the “Fund”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a Capital Support Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of February 21, 2008; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions provided herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein,
capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 
 2. Section 3(c)(iii) of the Agreement is hereby deleted
in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: 
 (iii) 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 28, 2009. 
 3. If the Board of Trustees of the Trust (the “Board”) determines that the Maximum Contribution Amount, reduced by the amount of any Capital
Contribution previously made by the Support Provider to the Fund, will not be sufficient to maintain the Fund’s net asset value per share at no less than the Minimum Permissible NAV, the Board, at its option, may cause the Fund to sell the
Eligible Notes. Such sale is a “sale” for purposes of Section 1 (c) of the Agreement, which defines a “Contribution Event.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Capital Support Agreement to be executed this 15th day of July 2008. 








			
	NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ William R. Dodds, Jr.

	Name:	 	William R. Dodds, Jr.
	Title:	 	Treasurer
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	50 S. LaSalle St.
	Chicago, IL 60603
	Attn: William R. Dodds, Jr.
	
	NORTHERN FUNDS FOR AND ON
BEHALF OF ITS MONEY MARKET FUND
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Lloyd A. Wennlund

	Name:	 	Lloyd A. Wennlund
	Title:	 	President
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	50 S. LaSalle St.
	Chicago, IL 60603
	Attn: Lloyd A. Wennlund
SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


 


 


Voice Life, Inc.


c/o Robert Smith


7071Warner Ave. Suite 460


Huntington Beach, CA 92647


 


Gentlemen:


 


1.                 
Subscription. The undersigned, desiring to invest in Voice Life, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), hereby subscribes for the following securities of the Company:


 


____________________________________
shares of common stock of the Company (the “Shares”), par value $0.0001, issued in consideration for the


 


sum of __________________________________________.


 


2.                 
Representations and Warranties. By executing this Subscription Agreement, the undersigned
represents, warrants and acknowledges to the Company that:


 


a.The Shares are being
acquired for the account of the undersigned for investment and are not being acquired with a view to any distribution of the Shares,
and the undersigned is not, directly or indirectly, participating in an underwriting of any such distribution or transfer; and


 


b.The undersigned will
not sell or otherwise transfer or dispose of the Shares (i) except in strict compliance with (A) the provisions of this Subscription
Agreement and (B) the restrictions on transfer described herein and (ii) unless the Shares are (X) registered under the 1933 Act,
and any applicable state securities laws or (Y) the undersigned represents that the Shares may be sold in reliance on an exemption
from such registration requirements;


 


3.                 
Legend on Certificates. The undersigned agrees to the placement of an appropriate legend
reflecting the restrictive nature of the Shares on the certificates representing the Shares. 


 


4.                 
Successors and Assigns. This Subscription Agreement shall be binding upon and shall
inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and to the successors and assigns of the Company and to the legal representatives, successors
and permitted assignees of the undersigned. 


 


5.                 
Governing Law. This Subscription Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Nevada without regard to principles of conflicts of law.


 


6.                 
Counterparts. This Subscription Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.


 




    	 



    	 



    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Subscription Agreement.


 


DATED: _________________________


 


 


 





 


 


Address:


 


________________________


________________________


________________________


 


 


 


 


AGREED TO AND ACCEPTED BY:


 


VOICE LIFE, INC.


as of the ______ day of ____________________


 


 


By: ________________________________


 


Its: ______________
**Exhibit 99.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of K-telInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30,2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Philip Kives, Chairman, President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| By                                                              |   /s/ PHILIP  KIVES |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Philip  Kives                                                   |
| *Chairman,  Chief Executive Officer*                            |
| *(principal  executive officer), President  and  Director* |
| September  30, 2002                                             |

 

----
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ERIC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. JOSE ISR

AEL M ANZO-FLORES, De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 12-30255

D.C . No. 2:12-c r-06004-LR S M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Ea ste rn Distric t of W a shington Lonny R . Suko, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Ja

nua ry 21, 2014 ** B e fore : C ANB Y, SILVER M AN, a nd PAEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Jose Isra e l M anz o-Flore s a ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt a nd c ha lle nge s the 46-m onth se nte n c e im pose d following his guilty -ple a c onvic tion for be ing a n a lie n found in the

Unite d State s a fte r de porta tion, in viola

t ion of 8 U.S.C . § 1326. Pursua

nt to Ande rs v . C

alifornia , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), M anz o-Flore s’ s



# FIL ED JAN 27 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).c ounse l ha s file d a brie f stating tha

t the re are no grounds for re lie f, a long with a m otion to withdra

w a s c ounse l of re c ord. W e hav e provide d M anz o-Flore s the opportunity

to file a pro se supple m e nta l brie f. No pro se supple m e nta l brie f or answe ring brie f ha s be e n file d. M anz o-Flore s ha s wa ive d his right to a ppe a l his se nte nc e . Our indepe nde nt re vie w of the re c ord pursua nt to Pe nson v . Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), disc lose s no a rgua ble issue a s to theva lidity of the wa ive r. Se eUnite d State s v . W atson , 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th C ir. 2009). W e a c c ordingly dism iss thea

p pe a l. S e eid. at 988. C ounse l’ s m otion to withdra w is G RANT E D. DISM I SSE D.

1 2 - 3 0 2 5 5 2
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trey Resources, Inc. ("the Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark
Meller, President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of operations of
          the Company.


                                  Date: November 15, 2004

                                  By /s/ Mark Meller
                                  ---------------------
                                  Mark Meller
                                  President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                  Principal Financial Officer and Director
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Data Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul K. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

/s/ Paul K. McGrath
-----------------------

Paul K. McGrath
Chief Financial Officer
February 12, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ebank Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James L. Box, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/    James L. BoxJames L. BoxChief Executive OfficerMay 13, 2005