alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Martin Dennis ARRASMITH, Appellant.

No. 00-1614.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted April 5, 2001.

Decided April 9, 2001.

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Martin Dennis Arrasmith challenges the district court’s1 revocation of his supervised release. Upon careful review of the record, we conclude the revocation and resulting sentence were correct, and we reject each of Arrasmith’s arguments. Specifically, we reject Arrasmith’s unsupported arguments that the district court did not have jurisdiction over each of his alleged violations, *see*18 U.S.C. §§ 3231, 3237(a); and that the probation officer was required to immediately report his violations to the district court. Further, we conclude the district court’s finding that Arrasmith had violated his supervised release conditions was adequate and supported by the record, particularly by evidence that Arrasmith had used drugs and failed to comply with drug testing. *See*18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and (g)(3); *United States v. Stephens,*65 F.3d 738, 741 (8th Cir.1995) (defendant knowingly and willfully failed to comply with drug-treatment condition of supervised release when he failed to attend counseling sessions and submit urine specimens). We reject as meritless Arrasmith’s argument regarding disclosure of a mental health report. We construe Arrasmith’s remaining arguments as ineffective-assistance claims which would be better addressed in a collateral proceeding. *See United States v. Martin,*59 F.3d 767, 771 (8th Cir.1995).

Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Ar-rasmith’s pending motion.

A true copy.

1

. The HONORABLE GARY A. FENNER, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.
DuPont Chemical s & Fluoroproducts Chestnut Run Plaza 702 1276

- E 4417 Lancaster Pike Wilmington, DE 19805 USA

Chestnut Run Plaza 702 / 1276

- E , W ilmington, DE 19805 

## DuPont Chemicals & Fluoroproducts [ CONTAINS CLEAN AIR ACT CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION ]
October 10, 2014
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation Stratospheric Protection Division Attention: Margaret Sheppard 1310 L Street NW, 10 th Floor (Room 1029) Washingto n, DC 20005 Dear Ms Sheppard :
Reference: DuPont SNAP Information Notice

(Z)

- 1,1,1,4,4,4 - hexafluoro

- but

- 2 - ene (CAS RN 692

- 49 - 9 )

[ Studies for PMN Substance ] 

### [ Please see attached study reports regarding Formacel® 1100

.

DuPont

- 20806

- 385

– Inherent Biode gradability Study (OECD 302C)

DuPont

- 20806

- 1674

– Activated Sludge Respiration Inhibition Study (OECD 209)

DuPont

- 20806

- 316

– Acute Fish Toxicity Study (OECD 203)
We look forward to your response to this submission and finalization of the protocol. 

### Pleas e contact me if you have any questions about this submission or need further clarification ]

S incerely,

[ Helen Walter

- Terrinoni Global Marketing Manager Telephone: 302

- 999
- 2442 Email: helen.a.walter

- terrinoni@usa.dupont.com ] Via Federal Express
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD MANUEL BURGOS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S 04-0021 FCD DAD P

vs.

 M. YARBOROUGH, et al., 

Respondents. ORDER

 /

On November 3, 2005, the petitioner filed a motion for appointment of counsel. 

There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See

Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes

the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so require.” See

Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the

interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s November 3, 2005

motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a

later stage of the proceedings.

DATED: December 5, 2005.

DAD:mp

burg0021.110(2)

 

Case 2:04-cv-00021-FCD-DAD Document 64 Filed 12/05/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nexicon, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

                  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
         of the Company.


                                       By:  /s/   Richard A. Urrea
                                            --------------------------------
                                       August 15, 2005
                                       Richard A. Urrea
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Nexicon, Inc. and will
be retained by Nexicon, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
William Tepper 

<willt820@gmail.com>

Sent by: Environmental 

Defense <takeaction@edf.org>

10/05/2010 02:09 PM

Please respond to

William Tepper 

<willt820@gmail.com>

To Group A-AND-R-DOCKET@EPA

cc

bcc

Subject ATTENTION Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491

Oct 5, 2010

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Dear U.S. Agency,

ATTENTION Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491

I strongly support the proposed clean air plan to cut sulfur dioxide

and oxides of nitrogen from eastern smokestacks. And I urge the EPA to

strengthen its standards to secure greater health and environmental

benefits.

Your proposed rules to cut pollution from fossil fuel-fired power

plants would reduce power plant sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions by 71%

from 2005 levels and nitrogen oxide (NOx) by 52% from 2005 levels.

EPA's plan to clean up this smokestack pollution would protect public

health by avoiding:

14,000 to 36,000 premature deaths,

21,000 cases of acute bronchitis,

23,000 nonfatal heart attacks,

26,000 hospital and emergency room visits,

1.9 million days when people miss work or school,

240,000 cases of aggravated asthma, and

440,000 upper and lower respiratory symptoms.

And EPA's Rule would yield benefits of more than $120 to $290 billion

annually in 2014, compared to the estimated annual costs of $2.8

billion.

I support these rules and urge the EPA to strengthen its standards even

more to secure greater health and environmental benefits.

Reducing these emissioons will only help relieve the economic burden on

this country.

Sincerely,

William Tepper

125 Baycliff Dr

Rochester, NY 14609-4015
Docket No: FAA

- 2015

- 6546 Dir ID: 2015

- NM

- 179

- AD

Record of

Discussion

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval

Holder, manufactur e r, ATA, N B AA, R A A, A OPA, AL PA

, GAMA, e tc )?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTA C TED DATE TOPICS DI S CUSSED

Gu l fstream Aero s p ace

C o r p o r ation M u lti p le M u lti p le C on tin u e d O p erati on al

Safety o f Pr o d uct a n d A D

acti on s/ter m i n ati o n

Other/Additional Infor m ation: Gulfstream concurs w ith all aspects of this AD action.
Case 2:04-cv-01290-GEB-GGH Document 153 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 2Case 2:04-cv-01290-GEB-GGH Document 153 Filed 06/15/06 Page 2 of 2
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0551

Focus Ready Draft 10/4/2012

ENGINEER: Arnold \ JAS

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM]

SAT (concerns) (09/25/2012):

Migration to groundwater: Moderate

PBT rating: P2B1T1 .

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 78 ppb.)

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0551

Use: 

Number of Sites/ Location: 1

Advanced Aromatics LLC Baytown TX 77520

Days/yr: 250

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

Water or Incineration or Landfill

High End: 1.2E+2 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site

or 3.0E+4 kg/yr
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM]

Air

Typical: 8.3E+0 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site

Worst Case: 8.3E+0 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1

site

Air

Output 2: 2.9E-2 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site

RELEASE TOTAL

3.4E+4 kg/yr - all sites

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 23

Inhalation:

Exposure to Vapor (Class II)

Typical: 4.0E+3 mg/day over 250 days/yr

Worst Case: 1.2E+5 mg/day over 250 days/yr

Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 23

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit

 or data not specific to industry): Yes

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? Yes

 OR

 b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? 1-2 No

Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? Yes (both criteria

met)

Dermal:

Exposure to Liquid at 100.00% concentration

High End: 1.8E+3 mg/day over 250 days/yr
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM]

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 23
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INDIAN HARVEST SPECIALTIFOODS,

INC.,

NO. CIV. S-04-1055 FCD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISPOSAL

DOCUMENTS AFTER

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

Defendant.

 /

Based on the representations of counsel at a Settlement

Conference conducted before the undersigned on December 12, 2005,

the parties have settled the above-captioned case. The court now

orders that the dispositional documents disposing of the case be

filed no later than forty-five days from the effective date of this

order.

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby

VACATED.

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01055-FCD-KJM Document 67 Filed 12/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: December 13, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01055-FCD-KJM Document 67 Filed 12/13/05 Page 2 of 2
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk June 28, 2011

y0620 

# Order

June 28, 2011

142799

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 142799 COA: 295619 Wayne CC: 09-018971-FC JOSEPH HESTER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                        0000052466
<NAME>                       Ionics, Incorporated
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           13,169
<SECURITIES>                                        195
<RECEIVABLES>                                   129,240
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (3,459)
<INVENTORY>                                      33,880
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                193,802
<PP&E>                                          401,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (174,382)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  500,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            99,475
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         16,201
<OTHER-SE>                                      345,651
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    500,906
<SALES>                                         358,217
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                358,217
<CGS>                                           237,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   237,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2,643
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  668
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  28,620
<INCOME-TAX>                                      9,522
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              19,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     19,361
<EPS-BASIC>                                        1.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      1.18



</TABLE>
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 and
Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427
 
 I, Tammy
Lynn McNabb, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Welwind Energy International
Corp.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting the occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
      May 20, 2008
              
              /s/ Tammy
      Lynn McNabbTammy
      Lynn McNabb
                Principal
      Financial Officer
INVT     InvestAmerica,  Inc.

#148  -  4664  Lougheed  Highway,  Burnaby,  B.C.  V5C  5T5   Canada   Tel (604)
473-9331   Fax  (604)  473-9334

Crystsal  Marriott  S.A.                                      October  20,  2000
Suite  61,  Grosvenor  Close
Shirley  Street
Nassau,  New  Providence
Bahamas

Dear  Sirs:

Reference  is  made toa our agreement of November 22, 1999 pursuant to which you
acquired  preferred  stock  of  INVT  which is convertible into 7,604,980 common
shares  of  INVT  (the  "Shares").

This  confirms  that  you have agreed that the following sale restrictions shall
apply  during  the  5  year  period  following  November  22, 2000 (the "Lock-Up
Period"):

1.     Unless  specifically  authorized  in writing by the Board of Directors of
INVT  (or  an executive officer authorized by the Board) you shall not sell more
than  the  following  number of Shares during the following specified intervals,
subject  to  the  following  rights  of  cumulation  and  early  termination:

     Year  1  -  3  of  Lock-Up  Period:     .15%  (ie. 11,407 Shares) per month
     Year  4  -  5  of  Lock-Up  Period:     .30%  (ie. 22,815 Shares) per month

2.     The  above  monthly  rate  of  sale shall be cumulative for 6 months (ie.
Shares which become eligible for sale in any month may be sold during that month
or in any of the 5 months following).  Any Shares which are not sold during such
6  month  period  may  not  be  sold  until  expiry  of  the  Lock-Up  Period.

3.     If  during the Lock-Up Period INVT stock trades for $10 or more per share
for  60  consecutive  days  at  an  average  volume of 250,000 shares per day or
greater,  the  above  sale restrictions shall be terminated at the conclusion of
such  60  day  period.

You  agree  that  if  you  violate  the  terms  of  this agreement, INVT will be
entitled, without limitation, to obtain injunctive relief against you as well as
any other legal and equitable remedies available, and you will be liable for any
and  all  legal  fees  incurred  by  INVT  in  pursuing  such  remedies.

Please  acknowledge  your  agreement  to  the  foregoing  terms  by  signing and
returning  a  copy  of  this  letter.

Yours  very  truly,

INVESTAMERICA,  INC.          ACKNOWLEDGED  AND  AGREED  by
                              Cryststal  Marriott  S.A.
By: /s/ signed                By: /s/ signed
Douglas  Smith,               Madeline  Gray
President  and  CEO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRADY ARMSTRONG,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-1269-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

SILVA GARCIA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has

filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On July 26, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

On August 17, 2005, plaintiff was granted an additional thirty

Case 2:04-cv-01269-GEB -KJM Document 17 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

days to file objections. Plaintiff has not filed objections to

the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 26,

2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Dated: September 28, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01269-GEB -KJM Document 17 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Irwin Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the "Report"), I,
Gregory F. Ehlinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: March 17, 2003               /s/ Gregory F. Ehlinger
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 Gregory F. Ehlinger
                                 Chief Financial Officer