alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANTTO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Donovan Jones, Chief Executive Officer of CounterPath
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|/s/ Donovan Jones                     | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|Donovan Jones                         | 
|President and Chief Executive Officer | 

December 15, 2009

I, David Karp, Chief Financial Officer of CounterPath
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|/s/ David Karp                                   | 
|------------------------------------------------ | 
|David Karp                                       | 
|Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary | 
|                                                 | 
|December 15, 2009                                | 

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROY RUSSELL LONG,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1444 FCD KJM P

vs.

PLACER COUNTY JAIL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a previous state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights

action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-01444-FCD-KJM Document 7 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 8, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED:May 23, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

/long1444.800

Case 2:04-cv-01444-FCD-KJM Document 7 Filed 05/25/05 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ ) MUKHTAR YAHYA NAJEE ) AL WARAFI ) ) Petitioner , ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 09-2368 (RCL) ) BARACK H. OBAMA , et al. , ) ) Respondents . ) ____________________________________)

ORDER Upon consideration of Petitioner Mukh tar al Warafi’s Consent Motion for Extension of Time, it is hereby ordered:
Petitioner’s Consent Motion for Extension of Time is gran ted. Petitioner shall file his response to the Respondents’ post-he aring brief on or before February 19, 2010.

SO ORDERED.

___________ /s/

_________________________ United States District Judge Date: ______ 2/16/2010

___________________
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

mniteb ~tate5 <!Court of ~peaI5 

for tbe jf eberaI <!Circuit 

JEFFREY A. KNOLL, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v. 

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS, 

Respondent-Appellee_ 

2012-7057 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in case no. 09-4422, Judge William A. 

Moorman. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 

Jeffrey A. Knoll moves to withdraw his appeal. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion to withdraw the appeal is granted. 

The appeal is dismissed. 
KNOLLv.DVA 2 

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

MAR 09 2012 

Date 

cc: Peter J. Meadows, Esq. 

Nelson R. Richards, Esq. 

s21 

FOR THE COURT 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

Issued As A Mandate: __ MA_R_0_9.....:2::...:0--'12'---_ 

FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR 

THE FED~RAl CIRCUIT 

MAR 092012 

JAN HORBALY 

CLERK
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN ELLIS, No. CIV S-04-1483-LKK-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

ALBONICO, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for

leave to amend his complaint (Doc. 19) and defendants’ opposition thereto (Doc. 20).

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that a party may amend his or her

pleading “. . . once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is served.” Fed.

R. Civ. P. 15(a). Once a responsive pleading is filed, a party’s pleadings may only be amended

upon leave of court or stipulation of all the parties. See id. Where leave of court to amend is

sought, the court considers the following factors: (1) whether there is a reasonable relationship

between the original and amended pleadings; (2) whether the grant of leave to amend is in the

interest of judicial economy and will promote the speedy resolution of the entire controversy; (3)

Case 2:04-cv-01483-LKK -CMK Document 21 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

whether there was a delay in seeking leave to amend; (4) whether the grant of leave to amend

would delay a trial on the merits of the original claim; and (5) whether the opposing party will be

prejudiced by amendment. See Jackson v. Bank of Hawai’i, 902 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1990). 

Leave to amend should be denied where the proposed amendment is frivolous. See DCD

Programs, Ltd. v. Leighton, 833 F.2d 183, 186 (9th Cir. 1987).

In his motion, plaintiff seeks leave to amend the complaint in order to add

allegations against a new defendant. Specifically, plaintiff seeks to add a claim against a prison

official who allegedly falsified information in plaintiff’s disciplinary proceeding. As defendants

correctly note in their opposition, such a claim is not cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because

a judgment in plaintiff’s favor would necessarily imply the invalidity of the underlying

disciplinary process. See Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 483-84 (1994); Edwards v. Balisok,

520 U.S. 641, 646 (1997). For this reason, plaintiff’s proposed amendment would be frivolous.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file an amended complaint is denied; and

2. This action shall proceed on the original complaint, filed on July 28, 2004.

DATED: October 12, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01483-LKK -CMK Document 21 Filed 10/13/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE13a-14(a)

I, Philip Kives, certifythat:

1.               I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, of K-tel International, Inc.;

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.               Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.              Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c.               Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (orpersons performing the equivalent functions):

a.               All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

b.              Any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: September 18, 2006 |
|--------------------------|
|                     |
|                     |
|                     | /s/ Philip Kives |
|                     | Philip Kives |
|                     | President and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9323]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3594]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER07-488-000]


Southern California Edison Company; Notice Extending Comment 
Period

February 23, 2007.
    On February 20, 2007, the Commission issued a ``Notice of Filing'' 
in the above-captioned proceeding. Combined Notice of Filings #2, 
February 20, 2007. By this notice the comment period has been extended 
to and including March 5, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3594 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 1 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 2 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 3 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 4 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 5 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 6 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 7 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 8 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 9 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 10 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 11 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 12 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 13 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 14 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 15 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 16 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 17 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 18 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 19 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 20 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 21 of 22
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 83 Filed 09/26/07 Page 22 of 22
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8978]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3500]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Northern 
New Mexico

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the cancellation of the March 5, 2007, 
meeting of the Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board 
(EM SSAB), Northern New Mexico. The Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this 
meeting cancellation be announced in the Federal Register. This meeting 
is being rescheduled to March 12, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Menice Santistevan, Northern New 
Mexico Citizens' Advisory Board (NNMCAB), 1660 Old Pecos Trail, Suite 
B, Santa Fe, NM 87505. Phone (505) 995-0393; Fax (505) 989-1752 or E-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#731e00121d071a00071605121d33171c16121f5d141c05"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e78a948689938e949382918689a7838882868bc9808891">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Issued at Washington, DC on February 23, 2007.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-3500 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6405-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
ZUCKERT SCOUTT

RASENBERGER

888 Sc\'cnrccnth Street, N\V, Suite 700

\'\\t,hington, DC 20006.3309

December 19, 2014

YIA REGULATIONS. GOY AND EMAIL

Docket Management Facility

West Building Ground Floor, Room W 12-140

U.S. Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Attn: DOT-OST-1998-3304

Michael Crook

Coordinator, Transportation Disaster Operations

Transportation Disaster Assistance Division

National Transportation Safety Board

490 L'Enfant Plaza East, SW

Washington, D.C. 20594

mi chael.crook@ntsb.gov

Re: Alitalia - Societa Aerea Italiana S.p.A.

Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Plan

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Effective January 1,2015, Alitalia - Societa Aerea ltaliana S.p.A. ("Alitalia SAl") will

succeed Alitalia - Compagnia Aerea Italiana S.p.A. 's ("Alitalia CAl") with respect to the latter's

air transport services. By means of this letter, Alitalia SAl hereby provides notification that it

shall adopt the Aviation Disaster Family Assistance Plan of Alitalia CAl, on file with both the

Department of Transportation and National TranspOltation Safety Board ("NTSB"). The

emergency contact information provided to the NTSB 011 April 3, 2014 remains unchanged.

Please do not hesitate to contact any of the undersigned at: should you have any

questions.

Respectfully submitted,

Jonathon H. Foglia

Richard D. Mathias

David M. Endersbee

COlll1selto ALIT ALIA - SOCIET A

AEREA ITALIANA S.P.A.

Zuckerl. Scautt & Rascnbergcr. 'L.L.P.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



| |  | The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of
American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and the results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  |                                                                                    
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: /s/ Alan Goldstein                                                             
| |  |                                                                                    
| |  | Alan Goldstein
Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer

Date: May 14, 2003

16
(Reap. Dec. 10710)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 8431, etc.

(Decided April 7, 1964)

*Stein & SKostak*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise manufactured by Yacht Rubber Ind. Co. or Yamamoto Kagaku Kenkyusho, covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, which is incorporated herein:

> 1. That, on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for *491sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values, ex factory, net packed.

> 2. That all of the merchandise covered by all of the appeals for reappraisement the subject of this stipulation was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

> 3. That as to any of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases which is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521 as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress which is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> 4. That the footwear covered by the entries, 'the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, is unlike any articles manufactured or produced in the United States.

> 5. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is-defined in section 402a(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value was the invoice unit value, ex-factory, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.