alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DAVIS WILLIAMS : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL :

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION : NO. 2005-3756

 ORDER

AND NOW, this 4 day May, 2009, upon consideration of the parties’ Motions for th

Summary Judgment, and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of

United States Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport, and after review of Plaintiff’s

Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. the Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and

3. the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J.____________

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Case 2:05-cv-03756-JHS Document 15 Filed 05/05/09 Page 1 of 1
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4315 

To require Amtrak to install baby changing tables in all ADA-accessible 

bathrooms on passenger rail cars. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2024 

Mr. WELCH (for himself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require Amtrak to install baby changing tables in all 

ADA-accessible bathrooms on passenger rail cars. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baby Changing on 

5 Board Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INSTALLATION OF BABY CHANGING TABLES ON AM7 TRAK TRAINS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 243 of title 49, United 

9 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 24313 

10 the following: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4315 IS

1 ‘‘§ 24314. Baby changing tables 

2 ‘‘(a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

3 ‘‘(1) ADA-COMPLIANT RESTROOM.—The term 

4 ‘ADA-compliant restroom’ means a restroom that 

5 complies with the requirements set forth in section 

6 242(a) of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 

7 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12162(a)). 

8 ‘‘(2) BABY CHANGING TABLE.—The term ‘baby 

9 changing table’ means an elevated, freestanding 

10 structure generally designed to support and retain a 

11 child with a body weight of up to 30 pounds in a 

12 horizontal position for the purpose of allowing an in13 dividual to change the child’s diaper, including pull14 out or drop-down changing surfaces. 

15 ‘‘(3) COVERED PASSENGER RAIL TRAIN.—The 

16 term ‘covered passenger rail train’— 

17 ‘‘(A) means a passenger rail train that— 

18 ‘‘(i) is owned and operated by the Na19 tional Railroad Passenger Corporation 

20 (commonly known as ‘Amtrak’); and 

21 ‘‘(ii) was solicited for purchase after 

22 the date of the enactment of the Baby 

23 Changing on Board Act for use by Am24 trak; and 

25 ‘‘(B) does not include any passenger rail 

26 train that Amtrak operates, but does not own. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4315 IS

1 ‘‘(b) BABY CHANGING TABLES.— 

2 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—All covered passenger rail 

3 trains shall have a baby changing table in each 

4 ADA-compliant restroom. 

5 ‘‘(2) SIGNAGE.—Each ADA-compliant restroom 

6 shall clearly indicate with signage the presence of a 

7 baby changing table and such baby changing tables 

8 shall be clearly identified with signage.’’. 

9 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The chapter analysis 

10 for chapter 243 of title 49, United States Code, is amend11 ed by inserting after the item relating to section 24313 

12 the following: 

‘‘24314. Baby changing tables.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ISS GROUP, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         134,451
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,508
<ALLOWANCES>                                       644
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,909
<PP&E>                                          14,614
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 175,979
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,546
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                     149,782
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   175,979
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                80,255
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,962
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                       311
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,996
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,996
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09


</TABLE>
[Cite as Parks v. Blanchester Bd. of Pub. Affairs, 2022-Ohio-319.]

{¶1} On December 22, 2021, a Special Master issued a Report and 

Recommendation in this public-records case. The Special Master recommends (1) 

denying the claim for production of records and (2) assessing costs to Requester. 

{¶2} Neither party has timely filed written objections to the Report and 

Recommendation, as permitted by R.C. 2743.75(F)(2). Pursuant to R.C. 2743.75(F)(2), 

if neither party timely objects to a special master’s report and recommendation, then this 

Court is required to “promptly issue a final order adopting the report and 

recommendation, unless it determines that there is an error of law or other defect 

evident on the face of the report and recommendation.” 

{¶3} The Court determines that there is no error of law or other defect evident on 

the face of the Special Master’s Report and Recommendation of December 22, 2021. 

The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Court costs are assessed to 

Requester. The Clerk shall serve upon all parties notice of this judgment and its date of 

entry upon the journal. 

 

 PATRICK E. SHEERAN 

 Judge 

Filed January 11, 2022 

Sent to S.C. Reporter 2/4/22

JOSHUA PARKS 

 Requester 

 v. 

BLANCHESTER BOARD OF PUBLIC 

AFFAIRS, VILLAGE OF BLANCHESTER 

 Respondent 

Case No. 2021-00524PQ 

Judge Patrick E. Sheeran 

JUDGMENT ENTRY
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation of Dismissal; Order of Dismissal with Prejudice 1

DOUGLAS K. deVRIES (SB#70633)

deVRIES LAW FIRM

1792 Tribute Road, Suite 480

Sacramento, CA 95815

Tel: 916/473-4343

Fax: 916/473-4342

ROBERT K. SCOTT (SB#67466)

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT K. SCOTT

7700 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 605

Irvine, CA 92618

Tel: 949/753-4950

Fax: 949/753-4949 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

THOMAS M. HERLIHY (SBN 83615)

SEAN P. NALTY (SBN 121253) 

KELLY, HERLIHY & KLEIN LLP

44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2500

San Francisco, CA 94104

Telephone: (415) 951-0535

Facsimile: (415) 391-7808

Attorneys for Defendants

THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF AMERICA and

BERKSHIRE LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF AMERICA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

R. BROOKS BLOOMFIELD,

Plaintiff,

vs.

BERKSHIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA, THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF AMERICA,

Defendant. 

No. CIV.S-04-1080 DFL DAD

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL;

ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

PREJUDICE

________________________________

Case 2:04-cv-01080-DFL-DAD Document 17 Filed 10/11/05 Page 1 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation of Dismissal; Order of Dismissal, with Prejudice 2

Plaintiff R. Brooks Bloomfield (“plaintiff”) and defendants Berkshire Life Insurance Company

of America and The Guardian Life Insurance Company of America (“defendants”) have settled this

matter. Accordingly, plaintiff through his counsel of record Douglas K. deVries, deVries Law Firm, and

defendants, through their counsel of record Sean P. Nalty, Kelly, Herlihy & Klein, hereby stipulate, as

follows: This matter, having been settled, shall be dismissed with prejudice and in its entirety as to all

parties and all claims for relief.

Dated: October 3, 2005 deVRIES LAW FIRM

LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT K. SCOTT

 

By: /s/ Douglas K. deVries 

 DOUGLAS K. deVRIES

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: October 3, 2005 KELLY, HERLIHY & KLEIN LLP

 

By: /s/ Sean P. Nalty 

 Sean P. Nalty

Attorney for Defendant

THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF AMERICA and

BERKSHIRE LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY OF AMERICA

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties set forth above, this matter is dismissed with prejudice

and in its entirety as to all parties and all claims for relief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 7, 2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01080-DFL-DAD Document 17 Filed 10/11/05 Page 2 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation of Dismissal; Order of Dismissal, with Prejudice 3

Case 2:04-cv-01080-DFL-DAD Document 17 Filed 10/11/05 Page 3 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Stipulation of Dismissal; Order of Dismissal, with Prejudice 4

Case 2:04-cv-01080-DFL-DAD Document 17 Filed 10/11/05 Page 4 of 4
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

h1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

145936

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145936

COA: 305368

Saginaw CC: 10

- 034104

- FC

WENDOR MONCADO, SR.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 16, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Curtis J. Clawson, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;     c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting that are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       /s/ Curtis J. Clawson Curtis J. Clawson
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIUS JONES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0950 LKK CMK P

vs.

DAVE RUNNELS, Warden, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed his second request for an extension of time to file and serve a

response to the court’s order filed October 6, 2005. Good cause appearing, the request will be

granted. No further extensions of time will be granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's February 9, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and

serve a response to the court’s order filed October 6, 2005. 

DATED: February 22, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00950-LKK -CMK Document 29 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from James
River Corporation of Virginia's December 29, 1996 Form 10-K financial
statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000053117
<NAME>                        James River Corporation of Virginia
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                                34
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        718
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                          650
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    1520
<PP&E>                                              5867
<DEPRECIATION>                                      2116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      6542
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               1220
<BONDS>                                             1854
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          738
<COMMON>                                               9
<OTHER-SE>                                          1559
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        6542
<SALES>                                             5691
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    5691
<CGS>                                               4217
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       4217
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      11
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      289
<INCOME-TAX>                                         127
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  157
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                         157
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         1.14
        


</TABLE>
Part 2, Section V: USSGL Crosswalks to Standard

External Reports

This section includes crosswalks for use in Fiscal Year 2019 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map

USSGL accounts to external reports in accordance with current reporting guidance from the Office of

Management and Budget (OMB), the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB), and the

Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service).

Each report crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or

column on the reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This

subsidiary information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional

information on attributes.

All crosswalks require pre-closing USSGL account balances.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by

OMB and Fiscal Service: 

Section V Page Number

Balance Sheet (BS) V BS - 1

Statement of Net Cost (SNC) V SNC - 1

Statement of Changes in Net Position (SCNP) V SCNP - 1

Statement of Custodial Activity (SCA) V SCA - 1

Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) V SBR - 1

SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution

and Budgetary Resources and Budget Program and

Financing Schedule

V SF 133/Sch P - 1 

 

 

Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES T. DAVIS, No. 2:04-cv-0878 GEB DAD P

Plaintiff, ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

AD TESTIFICANDUM TO TRANSPORT

vs. CHARLES T. DAVIS, CDCR #P-05063,

PLAINTIFF

C/O KISSINGER, et al.,

DATE: September 25, 2012

Defendants. TIME: 9:00 a.m.

 /

Charles Davis, CDCR inmate # P-05063, a necessary and material witness in a

settlement conference in this case on September 25, 2012, is confined in Pleasant Valley State

Prison (PVSP), 24863 West Jayne Avenue, Coalinga, California 93210, in the custody of the

Warden. In order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus

ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before Magistrate

Judge Gregory G. Hollows at the U.S. District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814

in Courtroom #9, at 9:00 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a settlement

conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as

ordered by Judge Hollows; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution or other

appropriate facility at the discretion of the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation; 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this

inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden, PVSP, P. O. Box 8500, Coalinga, California, 93210:

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge

Hollows, at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement conference or as ordered

by Judge Hollows; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution, or other

appropriate facility at the discretion of the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitation. This inmate’s legal property, relevant to the above entitled case, shall accompany

the inmate.

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody

of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

DATED: August 1, 2012.

DAD:9

davi0878.841

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 213 Filed 08/02/12 Page 1 of 1
February 24,2010 \ 33 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's application to provide 

new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to 

Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

1 recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in reaching a 

landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and Los Angeles to 

Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's financial and commerce 

centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance membership, have 

underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. American is likewise committed to 

New York and Los Angles - both vital focal points of business, trade, entertainment, technology and education 

- providing unsurpassed air service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from these proposed 

new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need your help to make the 

JFK/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly from Kennedy to 

Haneda! 

Sincerely, 

/ /^A.^<£ /^Jj^v, Co H.LS. international Tours (NY), Inc.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Annual report**
 
1998 | 1999
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.89/2:
Item Number:0646-R-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000557062
 
February 12, 2020