Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-433 | August 31, 2018 Page 1 of 8

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), 

this Memorandum Decision shall not be 

regarded as precedent or cited before any 

court except for the purpose of establishing 

the defense of res judicata, collateral 

estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

Andrew Bernlohr

Indianapolis, Indiana

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Curtis T. Hill, Jr. 

Attorney General

Caryn N. Szyper

Deputy Attorney General 

Indianapolis, Indiana

I N T H E

COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

James Smalls,

Appellant-Defendant,

v.

State of Indiana,

Appellee-Plaintiff. 

August 31, 2018

Court of Appeals Case No.

18A-CR-433

Appeal from the Marion Superior 

Court

The Honorable Marc T. 

Rothenberg, Judge 

Trial Court Cause No.

49G02-1611-F2-44593

Brown, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-433 | August 31, 2018 Page 2 of 8

[1] James Smalls appeals convictions for criminal confinement as a level 3 felony 

and intimidation as a level 5 felony. We affirm. 

Procedural History

[2] In August 2016, Michael McMuray lived in Indianapolis with his girlfriend 

Heavenleigh Gentry. McMuray had met Smalls four or five months earlier 

through their mutual friend Blossom Kirby. McMuray, Gentry, and Kirby 

were at McMuray’s house on the evening of August 24, 2016. Kirby left the 

house at around 1:00 a.m., and McMuray and Gentry fell asleep.1 

[3] At approximately 7:30 a.m. on August 25, 2016, Smalls and another man 

knocked on the front door of McMuray’s house. Gentry was on the bed, and 

McMuray was waking up on the couch.2 McMuray opened the door, 

recognized Smalls but not the other man, and asked Smalls if he had the 

seventy dollars McMuray had previously loaned him, and Smalls indicated that 

he did not have the money. McMurray closed the door, turned to walk away,

and heard another knock on the door. When McMuray opened the door, a 

third man, Ulysses Sanders, stuck his arm through the open door and pointed a 

gun at McMuray’s face. McMuray pressed his body against the door in an 

attempt to push Sanders out and close the door, but Sanders’s arm was already 

 

1 McMuray testified that he, Gentry, and Kirby were “talking about a sexual endeavor” but that not 

“everybody was feeling comfortable so we all just backed out.” Transcript Volume II at 21. 

2

Photographs admitted into evidence show a mattress on the floor directly adjacent to a living room area and 

couch. 
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-433 | August 31, 2018 Page 3 of 8

in the door, and McMuray tried to obtain control of the gun. Smalls and the 

other two men forced their way into the home, knocked McMuray to the floor, 

and started to punch, kick, and stomp on him. McMuray screamed for help, 

yelled his neighbor’s name a couple of times, and tried to block the men’s 

blows. Gentry “was crying and hysterical” and “was sitting up on the bed and 

she watched the whole thing and screamed . . . .” Transcript Volume II at 28. 

The three men dragged McMuray into the middle of the room, and Smalls 

asked for money. Smalls and Sanders held guns, and the other man had a knife 

with an eight- or nine-inch blade. 

[4] Sanders walked over to Gentry, handed her his gun, and asked her to shoot 

McMuray. Gentry refused. Sanders then took the gun from Gentry, gave it to 

McMuray, and instructed him to shoot Gentry. McMuray also refused. Smalls 

said, “he ain’t got no heart.” Id. at 31. Smalls asked McMuray where he kept 

his money, McMuray said he had ten dollars on the computer stand, and 

Smalls took the money. Smalls walked back and forth while holding his gun in 

his hand, and Gentry was sitting on the bed. At some point, McMuray 

indicated he would shoot Gentry. Sanders handed the gun to McMuray, and 

McMuray pointed the gun at Sanders’s face and pulled the trigger, but the gun 

did not fire. Sanders wrestled the gun from McMuray and repeatedly struck 

him in the head with the butt of the gun, and Smalls pointed his gun at 

McMuray and said, “I’ll shoot you, you dumb b----.” Id. at 38. Gentry 

continued to sit on the bed, watch the attack, and cry. Smalls announced 

“we’re gonna straighten this out right now” and called Kirby, and McMuray 
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-433 | August 31, 2018 Page 4 of 8

heard Smalls say, while on the phone, “who did you say raped you? Who did 

you say robbed you?” Id. at 39. Smalls hung up and said “it don’t look good 

for you.” Id. Sanders again passed his gun to Gentry and attempted to 

convince her to shoot McMuray, and the intruders “were making comments 

about what they were going to do with her after they killed and got [McMuray] 

out of the why [sic].” Id. at 39-40. Kirby “burst in the door” and was “agitated 

that [McMuray] was still alive.” Id. at 40. The three intruders turned to Kirby

and, when they were paying attention to her, McMuray jumped up and “bolted 

out” the front door, ran toward a neighbor, and screamed for help and to call 

the police. Id. Soon afterwards, McMuray saw Smalls, Sanders, and the third 

man exit his home and go down the street. The responding police officer 

observed McMuray’s injuries and that Gentry “seemed to be very scared at the 

time.” Id. at 57. While law enforcement was gathering information, Kirby 

approached and began yelling and screaming, and the officer detained her. 

McMuray was treated at the hospital. 

[5] The State charged Smalls with: Count I, burglary as a level 2 felony; Count II, 

armed robbery as a level 3 felony; Count III, criminal confinement of McMuray 

as a level 3 felony; Count IV, criminal confinement of Gentry as a level 3 

felony; Count V, intimidation of McMuray as a level 5 felony; Count VI, 

intimidation of Gentry as a level 5 felony; and Count VII, battery resulting in 

moderate bodily injury to McMuray as a level 6 felony. At trial, Amber Fiers 

testified that she was dating Smalls in August 2016, that August 24th was their 

one-month anniversary, and that Smalls was with her the entire evening of 
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-433 | August 31, 2018 Page 5 of 8

August 24th and morning hours of August 25th. The jury found Smalls guilty 

on all counts. The court sentenced Smalls to twenty-three years with five years 

suspended on Count I, ordered that fourteen years of the sentence be served in 

the Department of Correction and four years be served through community 

corrections, and ordered that he serve one year on probation. The court also 

sentenced him to ten years for each of his convictions under Counts II, III, and 

IV, four years for each of his convictions under Counts V and VI, and one year 

for his conviction under Count VII, all to run concurrently with his sentence 

under Count I. 

Discussion

[6] Smalls claims the evidence does not support his convictions of criminal 

confinement of Gentry under Count IV and intimidation of Gentry under 

Count VI. When reviewing claims of insufficiency of the evidence, we do not 

reweigh the evidence or judge the credibility of witnesses. Jordan v. State, 656 

N.E.2d 816, 817 (Ind. 1995), reh’g denied. We look to the evidence and the 

reasonable inferences therefrom that support the verdict. Id. The conviction 

will be affirmed if there exists evidence of probative value from which a 

reasonable jury could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. 

A conviction may be sustained on the uncorroborated testimony of a single 

witness or victim. Lay v. State, 933 N.E.2d 38, 42 (Ind. Ct. App. 2010), trans. 

denied. A verdict may be sustained based on circumstantial evidence alone if 

that circumstantial evidence supports a reasonable inference of guilt. Maul v. 
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-433 | August 31, 2018 Page 6 of 8

State, 731 N.E.2d 438, 439 (Ind. 2000); Gonzalez v. State, 908 N.E.2d 338, 340 

(Ind. Ct. App. 2009). 

[7] Ind. Code § 35-42-3-3 provides in part that a person who knowingly or 

intentionally confines another person without the other person’s consent 

commits criminal confinement and that the offense is a level 3 felony if it is 

committed while armed with a deadly weapon. “Confine” means to 

substantially interfere with the liberty of a person. Ind. Code § 35-42-3-1. The 

State, under Count IV, alleged that Smalls and his accomplices knowingly

confined Gentry without her consent while Smalls and/or Sanders were armed 

with a handgun. Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1 provides in part that a person who 

communicates a threat to another person, with the intent that the other person 

engage in conduct against the other person’s will, commits intimidation and 

that the offense is a level 5 felony if, while committing it, the person draws or 

uses a deadly weapon. “Threat” means an expression, by words or action, of 

an intention to, among other things, unlawfully injure the person threatened or 

another person or unlawfully subject a person to physical confinement or 

restraint, or commit a crime. Ind. Code § 35-45-2-1(d). The State, under Count 

VI, alleged that Smalls and his accomplices communicated a threat to Gentry 

with the intent that she engage in conduct against her will, to-wit, to shoot 

McMuray, and in doing so they drew or used a handgun. 

[8] Smalls argues that Gentry did not testify and the State did not admit any 

statements she may have made to anyone. He argues “whether Gentry was in 

fact confined and, if so, whether that confinement was against her will and 
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-433 | August 31, 2018 Page 7 of 8

whether whatever, if anything, was conveyed from Smalls to Gentry were 

threats are wholly subjective inquiries” and “Gentry’s testimony is the only 

evidence that could prove what the State has asserted.” Appellant’s Brief at 10. 

[9] The State responds that it was not required to present Gentry’s testimony to 

show that Smalls committed the crimes against her and points to the violence of 

the home invasion, McMuray’s injuries, the fact the intruders were armed, 

Gentry’s demeanor during the attack, that Smalls pointed his firearm at 

McMuray and threatened to shoot, that the intruders openly discussed what 

they would do with Gentry after they killed McMuray, and that the intruders 

cajoled McMuray and Gentry into shooting one another. It maintains that 

Smalls’s argument is simply a request to reweigh the evidence. 

[10] The jury heard the testimony of McMuray regarding the violent actions of 

Smalls and the other intruders during the home invasion. McMuray testified 

regarding the men’s forceful entry into the residence while armed, the violent 

attack upon him, that Gentry was sitting on the mattress on the floor near the 

attack and witnessed the entire altercation, and that Gentry “was crying and 

hysterical.” Transcript Volume II at 28. The State presented photographic 

evidence of, and testimony describing, McMuray’s injuries as well as of the 

location of Gentry on the mattress on the floor relative to the attack upon 

McMuray in the residence. During the prolonged attack, Smalls and each of

the other attackers were armed. McMuray testified that Gentry “watched the 

whole thing and screamed.” Id. Smalls pointed his gun at McMuray and said 

he would shoot him. The men handed a gun to McMuray and directed him to 
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A-CR-433 | August 31, 2018 Page 8 of 8

shoot Gentry, which he refused to do, and they handed a gun to Gentry and 

commanded her to shoot McMuray, which she refused to do. The intruders 

discussed “what they were going to do with [Gentry] after they killed” 

McMuray. Id. at 39. Kirby arrived and was agitated that McMuray was alive. 

The officer responding to the scene observed that Gentry was “very scared.” Id. 

at 57. 

[11] A reasonable jury could find from the testimony and evidence presented that 

Smalls and his accomplices, while armed, knowingly or intentionally 

substantially interfered with Gentry’s liberty without her consent and that, 

while using a deadly weapon, they communicated a threat to Gentry by words 

or actions with the intent that she engage in conduct against her will to shoot 

McMuray as charged. Smalls’s arguments constitute requests for this Court to 

reweigh the evidence, which we will not do. See Jordan, 656 N.E.2d at 817. 

Based upon the record, we conclude the State presented evidence of a probative 

nature from which the jury could find beyond a reasonable doubt that Smalls 

committed the offenses of criminal confinement of Gentry as a level 3 felony 

and intimidation of Gentry as a level 5 felony. For the foregoing reasons, we 

affirm Smalls’s convictions. 

[12] Affirmed. 

Altice, J., and Tavitas, J., concur.