alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT OF SUNAMERICA INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        18,523,655
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      96,541
<MORTGAGE>                                   3,139,309
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   81,569
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              24,408,178
<CASH>                                         993,349
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,118,582
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,636,886
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             19,998,418
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                              1,136,072
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    248,000
<COMMON>                                       195,349
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,140,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,636,886
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          1,637,947
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                            (29,203)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 317,703
<BENEFITS>                                     958,570
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    165,089
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                537,050
<INCOME-TAX>                                   158,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            379,050
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   379,050
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.80
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
August 30, 1945

No. 50443.

Suit 4493

#### Sherka *Chemical Co., Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 873 reversed July 3, 1945. C. A. D. 316.
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CounterPath Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the three-month period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark Bruk, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 9, 2007.

/s/ Mark Bruk                                                   

Mark Bruk 

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)
FinancialSection

*Management's Report on Responsibility for Financial Reporting*
        Management prepared the followingconsolidated financial statements and all other information included in thisAnnual Report and is responsible for its integrity, consistency and objectivity.In preparing these statements, management necessarily made certain estimates andjudgments and selected accounting principles in conformity with generallyaccepted accounting principles in the United States appropriate in thecircumstances. 

        Management is responsiblefor ensuring that these statements are not misstated due to material fraud orerror. Thus the Company has established and maintains a system of internalcontrol to provide efficient and effective operations, and reasonable assuranceas to the integrity and reliability of the financial statements, properfinancial disclosure and protection of assets. Qualified personnel in theCompany maintain and monitor these internal controls on an ongoing basis forcompliance. 

        The Audit Committee of theBoard of Directors, composed solely of outside directors, meets as required butnot less than quarterly with the independent auditors, management and internalaudit. Each has free and separate access to the Committee. The Committee reviewsaudit procedures, scope and findings, and the adequacy of the Company’sfinancial reporting. 

        The independent auditors,KPMG LLP, are elected by the Board of Directors to audit the financialstatements and render an opinion thereon. Management has made all corporaterecords and related data available to the independent auditors. Furthermore,management believes that all representations made to the independent auditorswere valid and appropriate. 
        /s/R. Philip Bixby                     /s/Tracy W. Knapp        R. Philip Bixby                        Tracy W. Knapp        President and CEO                      Senior Vice President, Finance   ***Contents:***   Management's Discussion ..............................     14   Selected Financial Data ..............................     16   Consolidated Financial Statements ....................     22   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements ...........     26   Independent Auditors' Report .........................     37   Stockholder Information ..............................     38
**MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION**
(Reap. Dec. 10407)

#### Hurricane Import Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 9298.

(Decided December 27, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*ior the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Quilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement upon stipulation reading as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise and the issues involved in the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Gitkin Co.,*A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 2. That at the time of exportation of the merchandise Involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation for exportation to the United States, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised *per se*unit values exclusive of the charges marked “X” in red ink.

> 3. That the involved merchandise was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after February 27,1958, and is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).

On tbe agreed facts, I find that export value, as defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise involved and that such values were the appraised *‘per se*unit values, exclusive of the charges marked “X” in red ink on the invoice.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Before the First Division,

February 16, 1945

No. 50026.

#### Protests 949849-G, etc., of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), certain of the *207items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent under the same paragraph as modified by T. D. 49458. The protests-were sustained to this extent.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3867 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Exhibit
      32.2










CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the quarterly report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with
      the Commission on November 14, 2006 (the “Report”), I, John Chen, Chief
      Financial Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:
                November 14, 2006/s/
                John Chen__________________________________By:
                John ChenTitle:
                Director and Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:04-cv-00886-MCE -PAN   Document 39    Filed 11/14/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-27T23:45:22-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4038 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Before the First Division,

November 10, 1960

No. 64853.

#### Joseph Markovits, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/4803, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
CONSENT OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN LIEU
OF MEETING


(AMERICATOWNE, INC.)


 


NOW COMES the Board
of Directors for AmericaTowne, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), pursuant to Article IV, Section 5
of the Bylaws for the Corporation consents to the following action in lieu of a meeting:


WHEREAS the Board
of Directors has determined to terminate the offering set forth in the registration statement on Form S-1, as amended, and related
prospectus, deemed effective by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on November 5, 2015 (referred to herein as
the “Offering”), in order to complete the processing of its FINRA Form 211 (“Form 211”).


WHEREAS the Board
of Directors has booked the sale of 386,524 shares of common stock under the Offering to 43 investors through the direct public
offering under the Offering during the term thereof for a total of $1,062,941.


NOW THEREFORE, the
Board of Directors consents to the following actions:


RESOLVED that the
Chairman of the Board, who also serves as the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer for the Corporation, shall disclose
on Form 8-K the termination of the Offering effective October 19, 2016 and the amounts sold under the direct public offering, and
to take any other action deemed proper to timely disclose the contents of these consents, including disclosure to Spartan Securities
Group, Ltd. for purposes of processing the Form 211.


Dated: October 19, 2016


/s/ Alton Perkins


By: Alton Perkins


Its: Chairman of the Board


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 








    	-1-
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Pursuant  to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned  officer of Genesis HealthCare Corporation (the Company) does hereby certify  with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the  quarterly period ended June 30, 2006 (the Report) that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                 |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|----------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: August 8, 2006 |   |   | /s/ James V. McKeon                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|                 |   |   |  

 

 

James V. McKeonChief Financial Officer

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

  |
```

                                    AGREEMENT

         This Agreement is made by and among George T. Haymaker, Jr. ("Optionee")
and Kaiser Aluminum Corporation and Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation, both
Delaware corporations (together, the "Company").

         WHEREAS, the Company granted to Optionee a stock option to purchase up
to 386,000 shares of common stock, $.01 par value per share, of Kaiser Aluminum
Corporation, and the terms and conditions of such grant are set forth in that
certain Performance-Accelerated Stock Option Grant between Optionee and the
Company having an effective date of January 1, 1998, as amended by that certain
Director and Non-Executive Chairman Agreement between Optionee and the Company
dated January 1, 2000 (the Performance-Accelerated Stock Option Grant, as so
amended, the "1998 Grant"); and

         WHEREAS, Optionee and the Company desire (i) to amend the 1998 Grant to
cancel 97,510 Option Shares, and (ii) to evidence the grant of a new stock
option to Optionee to purchase up to 97,510 Option Shares, on the same terms and
conditions as were applicable to the canceled portion of the 1998 Grant;

NOW, THEREFORE, Optionee and the Company hereby agree as follows:

         1. All capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings provided
in the 1998 Grant unless otherwise specifically provided herein.

         2. Effective as of April 14, 2000, the 1998 Grant is amended to cancel
97,510 Option Shares. Except as expressly set forth herein, the terms and
conditions of the 1998 Grant are hereby ratified and affirmed.

         3. This Agreement evidences that the Company has granted to Optionee,
effective as of April 14, 2000, the right, privilege and option to purchase up
to 97,510 Option Shares and that such grant is on the same terms and conditions
as are set forth in the 1998 Grant.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Optionee and the Company have executed this
Agreement effective as of the 14th day of April, 2000.

                                    "COMPANY"

                                    KAISER ALUMINUM CORPORATION

                                    By:      /S/ RAYMOND J. MILCHOVICH
                                    Raymond J. Milchovich
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

                                    KAISER ALUMINUM & CHEMICAL CORPORATION

                                    By:      /S/ RAYMOND J. MILCHOVICH
                                    Raymond J. Milchovich
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

                                    "OPTIONEE"

                                    /S/ GEORGE T. HAYMAKER, JR.
                                    George T. Haymaker, Jr.
```
Exhibit No. 23

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 (File Nos. 2-79770 and 333-45408) pertaining to the Journal
Communications, Inc. Employees' Individual Retirement Agreement and the Journal
Employees' Stock Trust of our report dated January 28, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Journal Communications, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.






/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 26, 2003

                                       74
Amendment No. 1 to Capital Support Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.5 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 CAPITAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Capital Support Agreement, is made as of the 15th day of July 2008, by and between the
Northern Trust Corporation (the “Support Provider”) and Northern Trust Global Funds plc (the “Company”) on behalf of its sub-fund The Sterling Fund (the “Fund”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties have entered into a Capital Support Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of February 21, 2008; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions provided herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement. 
 2. Section 3(c)(iii) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: 
 (iii) 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 28, 2009. 
 3. If the Board of Directors of the Fund (the “Board”) determines that the Maximum Contribution Amount, reduced by the amount of any Capital Contribution previously made by the Support Provider to the Fund,
will not be sufficient to maintain the Fund’s net asset value per share at no less than the Minimum Permissible NAV, the Board, at its option, may cause the Fund to sell the Eligible Notes. Such sale is a “sale” for purposes of
Section 1(c) of the Agreement, which defines a “Contribution Event.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this Amendment
No. 1 to the Capital Support Agreement to be executed this 15th day of July 2008. 








			
	NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ William R. Dodds, Jr.

	Name:	 	William R. Dodds, Jr.
	Title:	 	Treasurer
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	50 South LaSalle Street
	Chicago
	Illinois 60675
	United States of America
	
	NORTHERN TRUST GLOBAL
FUNDS PLC FOR AND ON BEHALF
OF THE STERLING FUND
		
	By:	 	 /s/ John Fitzpatrick

	Name:	 	John Fitzpatrick
	Title:	 	Director
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	George’s Court
	54-62 Townsend Street
	Dublin 2
	Ireland
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 * This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without

oral argument. L.R. 78-230(h).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DOUGLAS ENGRAHM, )

) 02:04-cv-1290-GEB-GGH

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER*

v. )

)

COUNTY OF COLUSA; COUNTY OF COLUSA )

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS; JOHN )

S. WRYSINSKI, individually and in )

his capacity as Director of County )

of Colusa Dept. of Public Works, )

)

Defendants. )

)

Defendants move for sanctions against Plaintiff’s counsel

(“Counsel”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 (“section 1927"). Counsel opposes

the motion.

 Section 1927 provides in relevant part: “Any attorney . . .

who so multiplies the proceedings in any case unreasonably and

vexatiously may be required by the court to satisfy personally the

excess costs, and attorneys’ fees reasonably incurred because of such

conduct.” Therefore, Defendants must establish that Counsel engaged

in “unreasonable” and “vexatious” conduct that “multipli[ed] the

proceedings.” See B.K.B v. Maui Police Dep’t, 276 F.3d 1091, 1107

(9th Cir. 2002).

Case 2:04-cv-01290-GEB-GGH Document 154 Filed 06/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Defendants contend Counsel “actually knew several [of

Plaintiff’s] claims were meritless as early as December 5, 2005,” but

“[C]ounsel maintained [these] meritless claims . . . in order to

increase the risk and costs to Defendants and extort a nuisance-value

settlement.” (Mot. at 1, 9.) Since Counsel did not rebut this point

in his opposition, the record indicates Counsel refused to dismiss

admittedly meritless and abandoned claims in order to enhance the

chances of settlement. But the issue is whether this refusal has been

shown to justify the imposition of sanctions under section 1927. 

Defendants’ argue Counsel’s conduct was like that of

plaintiff’s counsel in Edwards v. General Motors Corp., 153 F.3d 242

(5th Cir. 1998), and is therefore sanctionable. However, in Edwards,

the Fifth Circuit found that the record was “littered with indications

that [the plaintiff’s counsel] abandoned suit but willfully required

GM to continue to defend it . . . .” Id. at 246 (5th Cir. 1998)

(emphasis added). That is not the situation here; although Counsel

may have abandoned some claims, he did not abandon the entire action. 

Here, Defendants have not shown that any proceeding subsequent to

December 5, 2005, justifies the finding that the litigation

constituted an unreasonable multiplication of the proceedings. 

Since Counsel’s refusal to dismiss meritless claims has not

been shown to have “multiplie[d] the proceedings,” the motion is

denied. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: June 15, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01290-GEB-GGH Document 154 Filed 06/15/06 Page 2 of 2