alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Excluding the restated summary balance sheet information, this
schedule contains restated summary financial information taken from
the consolidated statements of operations of the Company's Form 10-K
for the year ended June 30, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                             496
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      323
<ALLOWANCES>                                         9
<INVENTORY>                                        313
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1200
<PP&E>                                            1130
<DEPRECIATION>                                     388
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3018 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              841
<BONDS>                                            557   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                        1134
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3018    
<SALES>                                           1597
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1597
<CGS>                                              838
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1317
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    228 
<INCOME-TAX>                                        84
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                144 
<DISCONTINUED>                                      68 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                       212 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.81 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.77 
        

</TABLE>
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Juan Carlos Flores v. State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 9

- 00 277

- C R

Trial court case number: 1531168D

Trial court: Criminal District Court No. 4 of Tarrant County

Appellant, J uan Carlos Flores

, filed a notice of appeal from a trial court judgment signed

on March 15 , 201 9

. On Ma y 14 , 201 9 , the court reporter filed in th is Court a sealed reporter’s

record containing a presentence investigation report (“PSI”)

. Flores has filed an “Unopposed Motion For Order Granting Parties’ Access To Sealed Materials in the Record on Appeal” by

which his counsel seeks to obtain a copy of t h is sealed record for use in preparing the appellant’s

brief.

W e abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a hearing, at which counsel for the parties shall be present, to determine whether the sealed PSI may be released for inspection

. T he trial court shall make findings and issue an order specifying :

(1) whether the sealed PSI may be released for inspection or access to the seal ed record permitted ; and

(2) if th at sealed record or any portions of it may be released or accessed :

a. the person or persons to whom the sealed record may be released or the person or persons who may have access to the sealed record ;

b. any limitations on release or access, e.g. , whether the sealed record may be

viewed or inspected only at this Court’s Clerk’s Office or whether the sealed

record or a copy of the sealed record may be viewed or inspected in Tarrant County at a place designated by the trial court

. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP . P. 34.5(g), 34.6(h);

1 

### The Supreme Court of Texas, pursuant to its docket

- equalization authority, transferred this appeal from the Second District Court of Appeals in Fort Worth to this Court. Seec. w hether the sealed record may be copied and, if appro priate

, provide for the return or disposal of any copies;

d. the purpose for which the sealed record may be used and any limitations on access or disclosure, including any use in appellate briefs or other documents.

The trial court may make any other findings and recommendations the court deems appropriate.

The trial court clerk is ordered to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and any order within 30 days of the date of this order.

The appeal is abated, treated a s a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this Court’s active docket without further order of the Court when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed with this Court.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signatu re:

_____

/s/ Sher ry Radack

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ May 30, 2019

____



### T EX



### . G OV 

### ’ T 

### C ODE 

### § 73.001 (“The supreme court may order cases transferred from one court of appeals to another at any time that, in the opinion of the supreme court, there is good cause for the transfer.”).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLINTON BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 432 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CLINTON BROWN,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 433 EAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of February, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

December 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131963 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131963 COA: 270964 Eaton CC: 00-020302-FC NICHOLAS MONROE SWINT, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e July 12, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would grant leave to appeal.

s1220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 29, 2006

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3353]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP96-312-162]


Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Termination of 
Negotiated Rate Agreement

February 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 12, 2007, Tennessee Gas Pipeline 
Company (Tennessee) tendered for filing a notice of termination of a 
negotiated rate agreement between Tennessee and Inergy Gas Marketing, 
LLC (Inergy), effective February 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a0e6e5f2e3efceccc9cec5f3d5d0d0cfd2d4e0c6c5d2c38ec7cfd6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c5838097868aaba9acaba096b0b5b5aab7b185a3a0b7a6eba2aab3">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3353 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Power of Attorney by Zhengdong Zhu, dated March 25, 2008



 Exhibit 10.13 
 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION 
 I, Zhu Zhengdong, the resident of People’s Republic of China (hereafter
“China”) and the ID card number 320102196806142439, am the shareholder who possesses 79% equity right (hereafter “Personal Equity”) of Beijing Dongda Zhengbao Science and Technology Co., Ltd (hereafter “S&T
Company”). I hereby, for my Personal Equity, irrevocably authorize the person appointed by Beijing Champion Distance Education Technology Co., Ltd (hereafter “Champion Company”) to exercise the following rights within the valid period
of this Letter of Authorization. 
 I authorize Champion Company or its appointed person as my exclusive agent to exercise the rights about my Personal
Equity on full behalf of myself, including without limitation: 
  

	1.	Exercise the shareholder’s right and the shareholder’s voting right that should be enjoyed by me according to the provisions of laws and Articles of Association, including
without limitation: sell, transfer, pledge, or dispose all or parts of my equity; and 

  

	2.	Designate and appoint the legal representative (chairman of the board of directors), directors, supervisors, general manager and other senior management staff of the company.


 Champion Company or its appointed person has the right, within the authorization limitation, to sign the Equity Transfer Contract provided
by the Exclusive Purchase Contract in which I am the signing party, to perform the Equity Pledge Contract and the Exclusive Purchase Contract according to schedule. The performance of such rights will not make any restriction for this Letter of
Authorization. 
 All conducts of Champion Company or its appointed person about my Personal Equity should be deemed as my personal conducts, all the
documents signed by Champion Company or its appointed person should be deemed as signed by myself without my agreement in advance. I will accept all the conducts above. 
 Champion Company or its appointed person has the right to sub-authorize the authorized matter above to other persons or entities without notice to me or getting the permission from me in advance. 
 This Letter of Authorization will be irrevocable and continuously effective during the period I am the shareholder of S&T Company as of this Letter of Authorization
executed. 
 I hereby waive the rights in relation to my Personal Equity that has been empowered to Champion Company or its appointed person according to
this Letter of Authorization within the valid period of the Letter of Authorization, and will not exercise such rights by myself. 
  

 1 








 CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY REGISTRANT 
  

			
	Signature:	 	Zhu Zhengdong
	Date:	 	March 25th, 2008
		
	Witness:	 	Yu Ning
	Date:	 	March 25th, 2008

  

 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

Merrick Jose Moore,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. S 04-0871 MCE PAN P

vs. Order on Request for Counsel

J. Sloss, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in a civil rights action. Plaintiff moved for

appointment of counsel May 18, 2005. 

In proceedings that do not threaten a litigant with loss of

physical liberty, there presumptively is no right to appointed

counsel. Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18,

26-27 (1981). Section 1915(e)(1) of Title 28 confers discretion

upon the court to request counsel represent an indigent civil

litigant. Mallard v. District Court, 490 U.S. 296 (1989).

Case 2:04-cv-00871-MCE -EFB Document 25 Filed 10/21/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In deciding whether to appoint counsel the court exercises

discretion governed by a number of factors, including the

likelihood of success on the merits and the applicant’s ability

to present his claims in light of their complexity. Weygandt v.

Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983); see also, LaMere v.

Risley, 827 F.2d 622, 626 (9th Cir. 1987). Ordinarily the

presumption of regularity in the state’s procedures for confining

prisoners suggests a lack of likely success and counsels against

appointment of counsel. See Maclin v. Freake, 650 F.2d 885, 887

(7th Cir. 1981). As a general rule, the court will not appoint

counsel unless the applicant shows his claim has merit in fact

and law. Id. Even if the applicant overcomes this hurdle, the

court will not appoint counsel if the law is settled and the

material facts are within the plaintiff’s possession, viz., they

do not require investigation outside the prison walls. Id. at

887-88. 

Here, plaintiff alleges his constitutional rights when

defendants retaliated against him for filing a grievance. The

law governing this issue is settled and investigation outside the

prison walls is unnecessary to discover material facts. There

is, on the record before the court, no reason to believe

appointment of counsel would be of significant benefit. 

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-00871-MCE -EFB Document 25 Filed 10/21/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

 Plaintiff’s May 18, 2005, request for the appointment of

counsel therefore is denied.

So ordered.

Dated: October 20, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00871-MCE -EFB Document 25 Filed 10/21/05 Page 3 of 3
Pay.Gov FLETC Training and Conference Payment Instructions

1. Go to www.fletc.gov/payment. The FLETC Training and Conference payment link will 

take you directly to the Pay.gov payment page for FLETC.

2. The first page is for information only, defining the types of payment that are accepted. 

Click CONTINUE TO THE FORM
3. On the Payment Form, complete as required. Your notification email provides much of 

the information needed to complete the form. 

a. Bill Number should be entered as “0” (zero).

b. Class or Conference Name should include the full class number (e.g. “G_AIM1901”).

c. Enter Beginning Date and Ending Date for the class.

d. Enter the Applicant’s Name.

e. Enter the Payment Amount. 

f. Click CONTINUE at the bottom.

4. The remaining steps will allow you to submit your Payment Information.

5. Review and Submit Payment.

Once complete, you will receive a copy of the receipt via email. Forward a copy of your Pay.Gov 

receipt to FLETCAdmissions@fletc.dhs.gov and include the student’s last name and course 

number in the email subject. Your application will then be updated to indicate that payment has 

been received and you will receive a detailed registration confirmation email.

Please note, this must be completed immediately. If we have not received a response from you

within seven (7) days, your registration may be cancelled.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 421 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 421

 To prohibit Federal funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and to 
require a GAO study regarding Federal funds previously provided to such 
    institute or to entities affiliated with the Chinese Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2023

   Ms. Ernst introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit Federal funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology and to 
require a GAO study regarding Federal funds previously provided to such 
    institute or to entities affiliated with the Chinese Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defund the Wuhan Institute of 
Virology Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL FUNDING TO THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF 
              VIROLOGY.

    (a) In General.--No funds authorized or appropriated by Federal law 
may be made available to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for any 
purpose.
    (b) GAO Study and Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General of the United States 
shall conduct a study and submit a report to Congress regarding the 
amount of Federal funds that were awarded or indirectly provided 
(whether purposely or inadvertently) during the 15-year period 
immediately preceding such date of enactment to--
            (1) the Wuhan Institute of Virology, including affiliated 
        researchers;
            (2) the People's Republic of China;
            (3) the Chinese Communist Party; or
            (4) any agency or instrumentality of the entities listed in 
        paragraphs (1) through (3).
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL ANTHONY WESBECHER,

Petitioner,

v.

DANIEL FOY,

Respondent.

CIV-S-04-0807 FCD CMK

ORDER

Respondent has requested a thirty (30) day extension of time in which to file a response to the

petition for writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner. GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, Respondent is

granted an extension of time to and including July 15, 2005, in which to file a response to the petition for

writ of habeas corpus filed by Petitioner.

DATED: June 20, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00807-FCD-CMK Document 18 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
10.2


 


LINE
OF CREDIT PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


Date:
March 1,
2015


 


$500,000.00


 


 


FOR
VALUE RECEIVED,
Group Excellence Management, LLC
(OBA:
MyeasyHQ),
("Borrower")
promises
to pay
to the order of P413 Management,
LLC ("Lender"),
a/an Texas,
Limited Liability Company,
the principal
sum of
Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000.00),
or so much thereof as may
be disbursed to,
or for the benefit of the Borrower by Lender in
Lender's sole and absolute discretion. It
is the intent
of the Borrower and Lender hereunder to create
a line of credit agreement between
Borrower and Lender whereby Borrower may
borrow up to $500,000.00
from Lender;
provided, however, that
Lender has no obligation to lend Borrower
any amounts hereunder and the decision to lend
such money lies in the sole
and complete discretion of
the Lender.


INTEREST
& PRINCIPAL:
The unpaid
principal of
this line
of credit
shall bear simple
interest at
the rate of six
percent (6%) per annum. Interest
shall be calculated
based on the principal
balance as may be
adjusted from time to time
to reflect additional advances made
hereunder. Interest on the
unpaid balance
of this Note shall accrue monthly
but shall not be
due and payable
until such time
as when the principal
balance of this Note
becomes due and payable.
The principal
balance of this Note shall
be due and payable
on March 31,
2019. There
shall be no penalty for early
repayment of all or any
part of the
principal.


 


DEFAULT:
The Borrower
shall be in
default of this
Note on the occurrence
of any of
the following
events: (i)
the Borrower shall fail to
meet its obligation to
make the required principal or
interest payments hereunder; (ii) the Borrower shall
be dissolved or liquidated; (iii) the Borrower shall make
an assignment for the benefit of creditors or shall be
unable to, or shall admit
in writing their inability to pay
their debts as they become due; (iv) the
Borrower shall commence any case, proceeding,
or other action under any existing or future law
of any jurisdiction relating to bankruptcy, insolvency,
reorganization or relief of debtors, or
any such action shall
be commenced against the undersigned;
(v) the Borrower shall suffer a
receiver to
be appointed for it or for any
of its property or shall suffer a garnishment,
attachment , levy or execution.


REMEDIES:
Upon default
of this
Note, Lender may
declare the
entire amount due
and owing hereunder
to be immediately
due and payable. Lender may also use all remedies
in law and in equity to enforce and collect
the amount owed under this
Note.


Borrower
hereby waives demand,
presentment, notice
of dishonor, diligence
in collecting,
grace and notice of protest.


 


Lender:


 


 


/s/ Carl Dorvil___________________


Carl Dorvil


Chief Executive Officer


P413 Management, LLC


 


Borrower:


 


 


/s/ Chelsea Christopherson__________


Chelsea Christopherson


 


Chief Operating Officer


Group
Excellence Management, LLC (OBA:
MyeasyHQ)
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131203 & (13)(14)(15) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131203 

 COA: 269121 

Jackson CC: 90-053331-FC 

LONZIE WAYNE MCQUIRTER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). The motion for appointment of 

counsel, motion to remand, and motion for miscellaneous relief are DENIED. 

d1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk