alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer


The undersigned, the Chairman, President and Treasurer of Jaco Electronics, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  to the best of my
knowledge,  that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended June 30, 2006 (the "Annual Report")  accompanying this certification fully
complies  with the  requirements  of  Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities
Exchange  Act of 1934,  as amended;  and (2) the  information  contained  in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and  results of  operations  of the  Company as of the dates and for the periods
presented as required by such report. The foregoing certification is based upon,
among other things, my  responsibilities  as principal  executive officer of the
Company, my own due diligence and representations  made by certain other members
of the Company's senior management.

Date:  September 28, 2006

                                  /s/ Joel H. Girsky
                                  -------------------------------------------
                                  Joel H. Girsky
                                  Chairman, President and Treasurer
                                  (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Alicia Borst Derrah, the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial officer of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.








Date:  November 15, 2010
/s/ Alicia Borst DerrahAlicia Borst DerrahVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

of Man Investment (USA) Corp., the General Partner
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Jerry Treppel, Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date:
August 15, 2011

/s/ Jerry TreppelJerry TreppelChief Executive Officerof Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Principal Executive Officer)




This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit** ___________________________ No. 13-2127 ___________________________ In re: Genmar Holdings, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllllDebtor ------------------------------ David Scot Lynd lllllllllllllllllllll Appellant v. Charles W. Ries lllllllllllllllllllll Appellee ____________ Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit ____________ Submitted: December 26, 2013 Filed: December 30, 2013 [Unpublished] ____________ Before WOLLMAN, BYE, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. ____________ PER CURIAM.David Lynd appeals the decision of th e Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) affirming the bankruptcy court’s 1 order denying Lynd’s motion for reconsideration of his “restitution claim” against Wood Manufacturing Company, Inc. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ ar guments on appeal, we agree with the BAP’s decision and find no basis to set aside the bankruptcy court’s order. See In re Ungar , 633 F.3d 675, 678-79 (8th Cir. 2011) (this c ourt applies same standards as BAP, reviewing bankruptcy court’s factual fi ndings for clear error, and its legal determinations de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. ______________________________

1 The Honorable Dennis D. O’Brien, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the District of Minnesota, now retired. -2-
Conference Call to Discuss Imidacloprid Pollinator Field Studies

December 5, 2013 3:00-4:00 PM EST

Participants:

California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR): Ann Prichard, Liz Pelham, Denise Alder, 

Rich Bireley, John Troiano, Jill Townzen

Health Canada’s Pest Management Regulatory Authority (PMRA): Connie Hart, Wayne Hou, Tina Singal, 

Mary Mitchell, Nicole Lauro

Bayer CropScience: David Fischer, Clive Halder, Lisa Bowers, Allen Olmstead, Jeff Parsons, Pete Cody

EPA: Rusty Wasem, Tom Moriarty, Neil Anderson, Patricia Parrot , Steven Snyderman, Keith Sappington, 

Anita Pease, Don Brady, Clayton Myers, Elizabeth Hill, Michael Wagman

All three Agencies held a conference call with Bayer to discuss the upcoming pollinator field effects 

studies required to support the re-evaluation of imidacloprid. Specific study design elements and timing 

of the studies were discussed as were how the Agencies intend to use the studies for risk assessment 

and risk management.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVA NIA** 

IN RE: REASSIGNMENT OF JUDGE OF THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : : : : : No. 34 1 Common Pleas Judicial Classification Docket

**O R D E R PER CURIA** **M:**

AND NOW , this 29th day of March , 201 7, upon consideration of the Petition of Jeffrey A. Manning, President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of the Fifth Judicial District of Pennsylvania, for the reassignment of a Judge to a division of the court, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition is granted and the following reassignment is approved :

From the Juvenile Section of the Family Division to the Civil Division The Honorable John T. McVay, Jr.
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 81

Dockets.Justia.com
Skip to content

 

Welcome to the COLD Database.

-  ** Your Account 
-  ** Log Out 
-  ** Login 
-    Language ****    - English
  - Deutsch
  - Español
  - Français
  - Italiano
  - 日本語
  - Nederlands
  - Português
  - Português (Brasil)
  - 中文(简体)
  - 中文(繁體)
  - Türkçe
  - עברית
  - Gaeilge
  - Cymraeg
  - Ελληνικά
  - Català
  - Euskara
  - Русский
  - čeština
  - Suomi
  - Svenska
  - polski
  - Dansk
  - slovenščina
  - اللغة العربية
  - বাংলা
  - Galego 

Advanced
Geographic Search

 

## The COLD Database

The COLD Database is comprised of the following:

### The USPA Permafrost Alert Program (2011 - 2022)

Between September 2011 and December 2022, the **COLD Database** was updated each month with new references to permafrost.  These updates were supported by the U. S. Permafrost Association which, with generous support from program sponsors, posted a monthly alert to the recent permafrost literature. For more information on the Permafrost Monthly Alert and the program sponsors please visit: www.uspermafrost.org/permafrost-monthly-alerts

### Bibliography on Cold Regions Science and Technology (1900-2011)

The *Bibliography on Cold Regions Science and Technology* (early 1900’s – 2011) includesreferences to scientific and engineering research related to material and operations in a winter battlefield, the nature and impact of cold on facilities and activities, cold-related environmental problems, and the impact of human activity on cold environments. 

### Antarctic Bibliography (1950-2011)

The *Antarctic Bibliography* (1950 – 2011) covers all disciplines related to the regionincluding biological and geological sciences, medical sciences, meteorology, oceanography,atmospheric and terrestrial physics, expeditions, logistics equipment and supplies, and tourism.

For more information see About the Database. Other resources- View IPY 2007-2008 publications by visiting the  International Polar Year Publications Database . 
- Browse the  *Antarctic Journal of the United States*  and its predecessors online. 

**About**
- About the Database
- Data Protection
- Register Details
- COLD Database Links
- Our Partners

**Search Options**
- Browse the Catalog
- New Items
- Search History
- Advanced Search
-  Geographic Search
- Search by First/Last Indexed

**Need Help?**
- Search Tips
- How to Use the Database
- Contact Us
- My Account

Last Modified: 09/27/2019    © American Geosciences Institute    

×Loading...
**
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-04	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 2/15/23
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-4609

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ZAKARIA TAOUFIK,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:18-cr-00073-CMH-1)

Submitted: January 7, 2022 Decided: February 1, 2022

Before KING and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Gregory B. English, ENGLISH LAW FIRM, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, 

for Appellant. Raj Parekh, Acting United States Attorney, Grace L. Hill, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Jacqueline R. Bechara, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

After his sentence was vacated on appeal, see United States v. Taoufik, 811 F. App’x 

835 (4th Cir. 2020) (No. 19-4073), Zakaria Taoufik was resentenced to 33 months in prison 

and 3 years of supervised release. On appeal, Taoufik’s counsel filed a brief pursuant to 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there were no meritorious grounds 

for appeal, but questioning whether Taoufik’s sentence of incarceration was procedurally 

and substantively reasonable. After filing his notice of appeal, Taoufik was released from 

prison, and his supervised release term was terminated by the district court due to Taoufik’s

deportation. The parties agree that Taoufik’s appeal is now moot.

 “[O]nce the convict’s sentence has expired some concrete and continuing injury 

other than the now-ended incarceration or parole—some collateral consequence of the 

conviction—must exist if the suit is to be maintained.” United States v. Hardy, 545 F.3d 

280, 283 (4th Cir. 2008) (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted). Taoufik, 

having completed his terms of imprisonment and supervised release, “bears the burden of 

demonstrating collateral consequences sufficient to meet Article III’s case-or-controversy 

requirement.” Id. at 284 (internal quotation marks omitted). Taoufik’s counsel has not 

attempted to meet this requirement and, in fact, agrees that the appeal is moot.

Because Taoufik has already served his terms of imprisonment and supervised 

release, there is no longer a live controversy regarding the length of his confinement or 

supervision. Therefore, the appeal of his sentence is moot, and we dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference:

        (i) in Registration Statement No. 33-54491 on Form S-8 pertaining to the
        James River Corporation of Virginia StockPlus Investment Plan;

        (ii) in  Registration  Statement  No.  33-57153  on Form S-8  pertaining
        to the James River Corporation of Virginia Canadian Employees Stock
        Purchase Plan;

        (iii) in  Registration  Statement  No.  333-33435 on Form S-8 pertaining
        to the Fort Howard  Corporation  Profit  Sharing  Retirement  Plan and
        the  Harmon  Assoc., Corp. Profit Sharing Plan;

        (iv) in  Registration  Statement  No.  33-43894  on Form S-8  pertaining
        to the James River Corporation of Virginia Stock Option Plan for Outside
        Directors;

        (v) in  Registration  Statement  No.  333-02213  on Form S-8  pertaining
        to the James River Corporation of Virginia Director Stock Ownership
        Plan;

        (vi) in  Registration  Statement  No.  33-56657 on Form S-8  pertaining
        to James River Corporation of Virginia 1987 Stock Option Plan;

        (vii) in  Registration  Statement No. 333-02217 on Form S-8  pertaining
        to the James River Corporation of Virginia Stock Incentive Plan;

        (viii)  in  Registration  Statement  No.  333-35013  on  Form  S-8
        pertaining  to the amendment to the James River Corporation of Virginia
        Stock Incentive Plan;

        (ix) in  Registration  Statement  No.  333-33431  on Form S-8 pertaining
        to the Fort Howard  Corporation  Management  Equity  Participation
        Agreement,  the  Fort Howard Corporation  Management  Equity  Plan,  and
        the Fort  Howard  Corporation  1995  Stock Incentive Plan;

        (x) in Registration  Statement No.  333-66715 on Form S-8 pertaining to
        the Fort James Corporation MIP Bonus Deferral Plan; and

        (xi) in Registration Statement No. 333-47287 on Form S-3 pertaining to
        the shelf registration statement of $800,000,000 of debt securities of
        Fort James Corporation of our report, dated February 4, 1999, on our
        audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement
        schedule of Fort James Corporation as of December 27, 1998 and December
        28, 1997, and for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
        December 27, 1998, which reports are  included in the 1998 Annual
        Report, which is incorporated herein by reference, or included in this
        Annual Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 22, 1999

                                       25
No. 53920.

#### Artisan Products Import, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 141016-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
**CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Welwind Energy International Corp.
        (the
        "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Tammy-Lynn McNabb, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
        knowledge:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ 
                  Tammy Lynn McNabbTammy
                  Lynn McNabb
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
                November
                  14, 2007
Before The Second Division,

June 20, 1963

No. 67848.

#### Rex-Spanall, Inc., and Universal Builders Supply Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 62/8885 and 60/28610 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of form supports similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Universal Builders Supply Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2319), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
#### Kline, Appellant, *v.*Caplan.

*Partnership*— Dissolution—Terms *of*— Issue *of fact*— Case *for jury.*

In an action of assumpsit on a judgment note, given in connection with the dissolution of a partnership, the case is for the jury and a verdict for the plaintiff will be sustained, where the issue is one of fact as to the terms of the dissolution agreement, and the case was submitted in a charge which was free from error.

Argued October 17, 1924.

Appeal, No. 116, Oct. T., 1924, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 4, Phila. Co., June T., 1921, No. 4507, on verdict for the plaintiff in the case of J. Alex Kline v. Samuel Caplan.

Before Oready, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

Assumpsit on judgment note. Before Finletter, J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

*221Verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $140 and judgment thereon. Plaintiff appealed.

*Errors assigned*were various rulings on evidence and refusal to grant a new trial.

*Edwin Fischer,*and with him *Abraham M. Rose*and *George Wentworth Carr,*for appellant.

*Abe J. Goldin,*and with him *Maurice J. Speiser,*for appellee.

December 13, 1924:

Per Curiam,

These parties conducted a business together for a certain time, each one contributing what he pleased. The partnership agreement was verbal, and the terms of the dissolution agreement are disputed. The jury was instructed, “the real question for you to settle is, as to what were the terms of the dissolution agreement? If you adopt Capian’s statement Kline would be entitled to a verdict of $118.75, and if you adopt Kline’s theory of the case, he would be entitled to a verdict of $400 with interest.” The jury rendered a verdict in plaintiff’s favor for $140. On the hearing of a motion for a new trial, the disputed questions were again reviewed by the trial judge.

After a careful examination of the charge of the court and its opinion in refusing to grant a new trial, we are satisfied that no reversible error was committed.

The judgment is affirmed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TODD W. AVARA,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1044 MCE DAD P

vs.

DARREL G. ADAMS, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Respondents’ December14, 2005 request for a thirty-day enlargement of time

is granted; and

2. The time for filing Respondents’ response to Petitioner’s petition for writ of

habeas corpus is extended to January 13, 2006.

DATED: December 15, 2005.

/avar1044.ext3

Case 2:04-cv-01044-ALA Document 33 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 1
Bulletin No. 2019-14

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Changes to U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury Financial Manual (TFM)

Supplement

1. Purpose—This Bulletin notifies agencies that Part 1 and Part 2 of the USSGL have been revised for

Fiscal Year (FY) 2019 and FY 2020.

2. Summary of Changes—The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL.

3. Changes by Part/Section/File

Part 1—FY 2019 Reporting changes to files in Sections IV, V, and VII:

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

USSGL Account Attribute Definition Report

USSGL Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2019 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

Statement of Custodial Activity

Statement of Budgetary Resources

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources & Schedule P Budget Program

and Financing Schedule

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2019 Reporting

Validation Summary

Validation Detail

Edit Summary

Edit Detail

Part 2—FY 2020 Reporting changes to files includes Sections IV, V, and VII:

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

Page 1 of 2
USSGL Account Attribute Definition Report

USSGL Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2020 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

Statement of Custodial Activity

Statement of Budgetary Resources

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources & Schedule P Budget Program

and Financing Schedule

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2020 Reporting

Validation Summary

Validation Detail

Edit Summary

Edit Detail

4. Effective Date

Part 1 requirements for FY 2019 are effectively immediately

Part 2 requirements for FY 2020 are effective October 1, 2019

5. Inquiries

Direct questions concerning this Bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Jaime M. Saling

Director, Financial Reports and Advisory Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Telephone: 304-480-6485

Fax: 304-480-5176

Date: August 1, 2019

Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRISHA CLOWER,

Plaintiff,

v.

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; RON

SMITH; and DOES I through XX,

Inclusive,

Defendants.

______________________________/

No. CIV-S-04-0042 MCE/PAN

ORDER RE: SETTLEMENT AND

DISPOSITION

Pursuant to the representations of the attorney for

plaintiff, the court has determined that this case is settled.

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160,

dispositional documents are to be filed on or before September

19, 2005. 

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-00042-MCE -PAN Document 53 Filed 09/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the

imposition of sanctions on any and all counsel as well as any

party or parties who cause non-compliance with this order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: September 2, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00042-MCE -PAN Document 53 Filed 09/02/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our reports dated March 17, 2008, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsand management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingincluded in the Annual Report of Furmanite Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the RegistrationStatements of Furmanite Corporation on Form S-8 (FileNos. 333-101996, 333-87446, 333-83970, 333-83968, 333-68558,333-34496, 333-60195, 333-22109, 333-14071, 333-14069, 333-14067,333-08727, 333-08725, 333-08723, 33-58981, 33-54027 and 33-41295)./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPDallas, Texas