alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3372]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry

    The Program Peer Review Subcommittee (PPRS) of the Board of 
Scientific Counselors (BSC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
(CDC), National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry (NCEH/ATSDR): Teleconference.
    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), CDC, NCEH/ATSDR announces the 
teleconference meeting of the aforementioned subcommittee:

    Time and Date: 8:30 a.m.-10:30 a.m. Eastern Daylight Saving 
Time, March 19, 2007.
    Place: The teleconference will originate at NCEH/ATSDR in 
Atlanta, Georgia. To participate, dial 877/315-6535 and enter 
conference code 383520.
    Purpose: Under the charge of the BSC, NCEH/ATSDR, the PPRS will 
provide the BSC, NCEH/ATSDR with advice and recommendations on NCEH/
ATSDR program peer review. They will serve the function of 
organizing, facilitating, and providing a long-term perspective to 
the conduct of NCEH/ATSDR program peer review.
    Matters To Be Discussed: Review and approve previous meeting 
minutes; report on site-specific activities peer review; a 
discussion of preparedness and emergency response peer review: 
breadth and approach of the review, and areas of expertise required 
for the review; nominations for a PPRS panel member, a chairperson, 
peer reviewers, and partners and customers.
    Agenda items are subject to change as priorities dictate.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. 
Eastern Daylight Saving Time. To participate, please dial 877/315-6535 
and enter conference code 383520. Public comment period is scheduled 
for 10 a.m.-10:15 a.m.

FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Malcom, Committee Management 
Specialist, Office of Science, NCEH/ATSDR, M/S E-28, 1600 Clifton Road, 
NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 404/498-0622.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both CDC and ATSDR.

Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-3372 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
No. 54046.

#### Mondial Co. *v.*United States,

protest 147813-K (New York).

*376Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation that 46 cases of sardines in oil, valued at over 23 cents per pound, including the weight of the immediate container, were withdrawn subsequent to the effective date of T. D. 51802, as amended by T. D. 51954, the claim at 15 percent under paragraph 718 (a) was sustained.
P. 1



# OAR Box 1818 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 20 ) ll-C-1 7
Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/6/2008 3:12:44

PM Sheet 20 of 79P. 2



## JU L 

## 2 I 198 7

Honorabl e Jak e Garn , Rankin g Minorit y Membe r Senat e Appropriation s Subcommitte e o

nHUD-Independen t Agencie s 50 5 Senat e Dirkse n Washington , D.C . 2051 0
Dea r Senato r Garn : Inthe Conferenc e Committe e Repor t fo r the 198 7 fisca l yea r budget , th

e conferee s requeste dtha t the U.S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y (EPA) " provid e Congres s wit hcertai n backgroundinformatio nregardin g the regulatio no f refuelin g emission s fro

m moto r vehicles , a s detaile d inth e Hous e Appropriation s Committe e Report
. Th e Hous e Appropriation s Committe e expresse d concer n tha t th e Agenc yma y no t have develope dsufficien t dat a wit hwhic ht o properl y asses s the desirabilit y

o f a nationwid e refuelin g contro l program . A s a consequence , EPA

wa s directe dto : 1 ) revie w the nee dfor an d effectivenes s o f a nationwid e refuelin g contro l program , 2 ) evaluat e the cost s an dbenefit s o f alternative s t o assur e a cost-effectiv e strategy , 3 ) assur e tha t requirement s o f th e Federa l Moto r Vehicl e -ifet yStandar d 30 1 o r potentia l defec t problem s relate d t o on , -'.>ar d control s ar e adequatel yresolved , and 4 ) addres s th e effect s o f fue l volatilit yonrefuelin g controls . T

naddition , th e Hous e Appropriation s Committe e aske dtha t informatio nregardin g th e abov e issue s and al l o f th e rulemakin g suppor t material s b e provide d t o Congres s concurrentl y

wit hEPA' s submissio n o f the proposa l fo r Federa l Registe r publication . I a m please dt o provil e ou r proposa l t o contro l refuelin g emission s an d the regul^cor ysuppor t material s t o Congress , a s requeste d (se e enclosure:";}

. I woul d lik e t o assur e th e member s o f Congres s tha t th e p : oose d actio n i s th e culminatio n o f a n intensiv e analysi s t o itifyth e mos t appropriat e formfo rP. 3

controllin g refuelin g emissions , and tha t al l th e concern s expresse d byth e Appropriation s Committe e hav e bee n carefull y considered
. A s always , w e wil l b e carefull yconsiderin g al l comment s receive d i n th e upcomin g publi c commen t perio d and publi c hearin g befor e proceedin g wit h furthe r regulator yactio n i n thi s area . Sincerely , (Origina l signe

d b yL.M
. Lhama s )
Le e M
. Thoma s Enclosure s
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1997
<CASH>                                          27,170
<SECURITIES>                                    11,317
<RECEIVABLES>                                  637,586
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,743
<INVENTORY>                                    399,414
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,137,477
<PP&E>                                       1,734,296
<DEPRECIATION>                                 735,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,869,863
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          974,868
<BONDS>                                        568,633
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,196,243
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,869,863
<SALES>                                      6,582,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,582,927
<CGS>                                        6,380,308
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,380,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,503
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,442
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                106,674
<INCOME-TAX>                                    40,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,174
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .70
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4114 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4114

To authorize a higher Federal share for emergency relief funds for the 
  reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge located in Baltimore 
City and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland, that collapsed 
               on March 26, 2024, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               April 11 (legislative day, April 10), 2024

 Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize a higher Federal share for emergency relief funds for the 
  reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge located in Baltimore 
City and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland, that collapsed 
               on March 26, 2024, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Baltimore Bridge Response Invests 
and Delivers Global Economic Relief Act'' or the ``Baltimore BRIDGE 
Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. FINDING.

    Congress finds that, in accordance with section 668.105(e) of title 
23, Code of Federal Regulations (or a successor regulation), any 
compensation for damages or insurance proceeds, including interest, 
recovered by a State, a political subdivision of a State, or a toll 
authority for repair, including reconstruction, of the bridge described 
in section 3 in response to the damage described in that section should 
be used on receipt to reduce liability on the repair, including 
reconstruction, of that bridge from the emergency fund authorized under 
section 125 of title 23, United States Code.

SEC. 3. FEDERAL SHARE FOR CERTAIN EMERGENCY RELIEF PROJECTS.

    Notwithstanding subsection (e) of section 120 of title 23, United 
States Code, the Federal share for emergency relief funds made 
available under section 125 of that title to respond to damage caused 
by the cargo ship Dali to the Francis Scott Key Bridge located in 
Baltimore City and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland, 
including reconstruction of that bridge and its approaches, shall be 
100 percent.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect as if enacted on March 26, 2024.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 1 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 2 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 3 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 4 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 5 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 6 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 7 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 8 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 9 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 10 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 11 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 12 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 13 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 14 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 15 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 16 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 17 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 18 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 19 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 20 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 21 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 22 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 23 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 24 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 25 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 26 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 27 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 28 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 29 of 30
Case 2:05-cv-05663-WD Document 13 Filed 04/30/08 Page 30 of 30
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

INDIAN HARVEST SPECIALTIFOODS,

INC.,

NO. CIV. S-04-1055 FCD/KJM

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

Defendant.

 /

The court is in receipt of defendant Westchester Fire

Insurance Company’s request that its representative be allowed to

appear telephonically at a Settlement Conference currently set for

December 12, 2005. The request is denied.

////

////

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-01055-FCD-KJM Document 66 Filed 11/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Each party is directed to have a principal capable of

disposition at the Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized

to settle the matter on any terms and at the Settlement Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: November 15, 2005

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01055-FCD-KJM Document 66 Filed 11/15/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Michael A. Trahan,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1371 GEB PAN P

vs. Order

Stockton Police Department, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoJune 22, 2005, defendants moved to dismiss. Plaintiff did

not oppose. September 19, 2005, plaintiff (now incarcerated at

Vacaville) requested copies of court records. Good cause

appearing, the court hereby orders that:

1. Plaintiff’s September 19, 2005, request for copies is

denied.

2. The Clerk of Court shall enter the Vacaville address on

plaintiff’s September 19, 2005, filing as his address as record.

3. Defendants shall serve their motion to dismiss on 

Case 2:04-cv-01371-GEB-PAN Document 14 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

plaintiff at his Vacaville address and notify the court within 10

days they have done so. Otherwise the motion will be vacated.

4. Plaintiff may oppose the motion to dismiss within 10

days of its service upon him; if he does not his failure to

oppose the motion may be deemed a concession to its merit.

5. If plaintiff is released from custody he must notify the

court and defendants of his new address.

Dated: September 22, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01371-GEB-PAN Document 14 Filed 09/23/05 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

June 28, 1943

No. 48448.

#### Protests 59193-K, etc., of Wax Museum, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ First Request For An Extension Of Time To Respond To Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

ROBERT R. ANDERSON

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

MONICA N. ANDERSON

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DANIEL P. O’DONNELL, State Bar No. 177872

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-5810

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Herrera, Grannis, Fisher,

Providence, Allen, Herrera, Schwartz, O’Ran, Lee and

Thumser

SA2005100247

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

GUY T. STRINGHAM,

Plaintiff,

v.

R. LEE, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CIV S-04-1530 DFL GGH P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

FIRST REQUEST FOR AN

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S 

DISCOVERY REQUESTS

The request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests was

considered by this Court, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted a 45 day extension of time to

respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests, to take effect from the date this order is filed.

DATED: 5/31/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

stri1530.eot05

Case 2:04-cv-01530-JAM-GGH Document 21 Filed 05/31/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHARON WYNONA POPPERT,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1378 FCD GGH P

vs.

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CA.,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 29, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01378-FCD-GGH Document 16 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 29, 2005, are adopted in full;

and 

2. Respondent’s September 10, 2004, motion to dismiss is granted.

DATED: May 17, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

/popp1378.801

Case 2:04-cv-01378-FCD-GGH Document 16 Filed 05/18/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Dale E. Messick, certify that: 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Luna Innovations Incorporated; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have: 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: August 13, 2007
No. 44006.

#### Protest 821401-G of American Import Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson,. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of balls similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Woolworth*(24 C. C. P. A. 338, T. D. 48770). The claim at 30 percent under paragraph 1502 was therefore sustained.
No. 52249.

protests 503828-G, etc. (New York).

#### F. A. Ramig Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.