alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3886 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3886

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to waive certain domestic 
  content procurement preferences with respect to certain State home 
                   projects, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2024

Mr. Risch (for himself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Crapo, and Mr. Lee) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                          on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to waive certain domestic 
  content procurement preferences with respect to certain State home 
                   projects, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Waiving Arbitrary and Inconsistent 
Veteran Home Eligibility and Requirements Act'' or the ``WAIVER Act''.

SEC. 2. WAIVER OF DOMESTIC PROCUREMENT PREFERENCE WITH RESPECT TO 
              CERTAIN STATE VETERANS HOME PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall waive 
under subsection (b) of section 70914 of the Build America, Buy America 
Act (subtitle A of title IX of division G of Public Law 117-58) the 
domestic content procurement preference under such section with respect 
to a project for the construction of State home facilities with respect 
to which the application under section 8135 of title 38, United States 
Code, for such project was submitted on or before April 15, 2022, and 
included in the ``VA State Home Construction Grants Priority List FY 
2023'', dated June 1, 2023.
    (b) State Home Defined.--In this section, the term ``State home'' 
has the meaning given that term in section 101(19) of title 38, United 
States Code.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
September 30, 1997 Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-Q and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            4209
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    82346
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3409
<INVENTORY>                                     142983
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                235959
<PP&E>                                          287565
<DEPRECIATION>                                  176642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  377281
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            70559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         69674
<OTHER-SE>                                      195886
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    377281
<SALES>                                         322649
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                322649
<CGS>                                           205219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   205219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  1326
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1307
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  27841
<INCOME-TAX>                                     10162
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              17679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     17679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .66


</TABLE>
No. 54655.

#### Paramount Bead Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 8891-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial the assistant chief chemist in the United States Customs Laboratory at the port of New York testified that an analysis of a sample of the merchandise involved showed it to be an article composed wholly of polymerized styrolene resin which, he stated, was a synthetic resin. The records in Abstracts 45795, 49907, 50189, and 51959 were incorporated herein. On the record presented and following the cited authorities, the claim-at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.
EXHIBIT  31. CERTIFICATION

I, William J. Reilly, President, certify that:

     1. I have  reviewed  this  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  of  Suncoast
Naturals, Inc.;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

     3.Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements  and other  financial
information  included in this  quarterly  report fairly  present in all material
respects the financial  condition,  results of operations  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
         a) Designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
         b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
and  procedures  as of a date  within 90 days prior to the  filing  date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
         c)  Presented  in this  quarterly  report  our  conclusions  about  the
effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

     5. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,  based
on our most  recent  evaluation,  to the  registrant's  auditors  and the  audit
committee  of  the  registrant's  board  of  directors  (or  persons  performing
theequivalent functions):
         a) All significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls  which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability to record,
process,  summarize  and  report  financial  data  and have  identified  for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
         b) Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
other  employees  who  have a  significant  role  in the  registrant's  internal
controls; and

     6. The registrant's other certifying  officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly  report  whether or not there  were  significant  changes in  internal
controls or in other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated: 12/13/04           /s/ WILLIAM J. REILLY
                        -----------------------
                        William J. Reilly
                        President, Director
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8720]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP06-416-001]


Northwest Pipeline Corporation; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 12, 2007, Northwest Pipeline 
Corporation (Northwest) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets, to 
become effective March 1, 2007:

Sixteenth Revised Sheet No. 7.
Original Sheet No. 7-A.
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 50.
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 51.
Sixth Revised Sheet No. 52.
Third Revised Sheet No. 52-A.
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 53.
First Revised Sheet No. 58.
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 322.
Fifth Revised Sheet No. 325.
Fourth Revised Sheet No. 326.
Original Sheet No. 326-A.
Third Revised Sheet No. 327.
Third Revised Sheet No. 328.
First Revised Sheet No. 329.

    Northwest states that the purpose of this filing is to comply with 
the Commission's February 5, 2007 order issuing a certificate to 
Northwest in Docket No. CP06-416-000.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing a 
protest must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d7b786f7e7253515453586e484d4d524f497d5b584f5e135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5f191a0d1c10313336313a0c2a2f2f302d2b1f393a2d3c71383029">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 8, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3343 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 58016.

protest 218423-K (New York).

#### Person & Weidhorn *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.




                                       /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       John A. Celentano, Jr.
                                       Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive
                                       Officer


                                       /s/ Christine R. Piano
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Christine R. Piano
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Date: November 7, 2008
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kevin Kelly, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: November 4, 2009

                                               /s/ Kevin Kelly
                                               Kevin Kelly
                                               Chief Executive Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANDRA DEANNE SHAYNE,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1492 MCE DAD P

vs.

DEBORAH JACQUES, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Respondents have filed a motion for reconsideration of the order filed July 21,

2005, denying respondents’ motion to dismiss. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s opposition to respondents’ motion for reconsideration shall be

filed and served within thirty days from the date of this order; and

2. Respondents’ reply shall be filed and served within fifteen days after

petitioner’s opposition is served.

DATED: November 23, 2005.

DAD:13

shay1492.mrecon

Case 2:04-cv-01492-MCE -DAD Document 24 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

TAC01-10:Order re Motion to Compel:8-24-05 - 1 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE TO 

SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES 

CALL, JENSEN & 

FERRELL 

A PROFESSIONAL 

CORPORATION

SCOTT J. FERRELL, Bar No. 202091 

LISA A. WEGNER, Bar No. 209917 

CALL, JENSEN & FERRELL 

A Professional Corporation 

610 Newport Center Drive, Suite 700 

Newport Beach, CA 92660 

(949) 717-3000 

Attorneys for Del Taco, Inc. dba DEL TACO #140; 

YUKATA MIURA and MARY MIURA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES SANFORD, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

DEL TACO, INC. dba DEL TACO 

#140; YUKATA MIURA and 

MARY MIURA; and DOES 1 

through 10, 

Defendants. 

Case No. CIVS-04-1337 DFL (CMK) 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 

COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE TO 

SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES 

Date: August 16, 2005 

Time: 10:00 a.m. 

Place: Redding 

Complaint Filed: August 10, 2004 

Trial Date: April 3, 2006 

The Motion to Compel Supplemental Response to Defendant Del Taco’s Second 

Set of Interrogatories Propounded on Plaintiff James Sanford (“Motion”) filed by 

Defendant Del Taco, Inc. dba Del Taco # 140 (“Defendant”) came on regularly for 

hearing on August 16, 2005 at 10:00 a.m., before the Honorable Craig M. Kellison of 

the above-entitled Court, located at 2986 Bechelli Lane, Redding, California. Lisa A. 

Case 2:04-cv-01337-DFL-CMK Document 34 Filed 08/24/05 Page 1 of 2
 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 

TAC01-10:Order re Motion to Compel:8-24-05 - 2 - 

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL FURTHER RESPONSE TO 

SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES 

CALL, JENSEN & 

FERRELL 

A PROFESSIONAL 

CORPORATION

Wegner of Call, Jensen & Ferrell appeared on behalf of Defendant. Mark Emmett of 

the Law Offices of Lynn Hubbard appeared on behalf of Plaintiff James Sanford 

(“Plaintiff”). 

After full consideration of the papers filed in support and opposition to the 

Motion, the Joint Statement setting forth the parties’ discovery disagreements with 

respect to the Motion, the declarations in support of the Motion, the other documents on 

file herein, and the oral argument of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Defendant’s Motion is hereby GRANTED. 

2. Plaintiff is hereby ordered to provide, within seven (7) calendar days of the 

date of this Court’s ruling on the Motion, a further and complete response, without 

objections, to Special Interrogatory No. 19 from Defendant’s Second Set of Special 

Interrogatories, seeking the identity of the preparer of the Site Inspection Report 

attached to Plaintiff’s complaint as Exhibit A. 

SO ORDERED. 

_____________________________________ 

CRAIG M. KELLISON 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01337-DFL-CMK Document 34 Filed 08/24/05 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10732)

#### Enco Chemical Corp. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 19477; 31621.

(Decided April 28, 1964)

*Eugene R. Pickrell*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement are directed to the merchandise, represented by the invoice items marked *533“A” and initialed “GWL,” which consists of sodium perborate, exported from West Germany during the period 1952 through May 15, 1961. Appraisement thereof was made on the basis of foreign value, as such value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (74 Treas. Dec. 17, T.D. 49646).

Counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the merchandise in question and the issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those which were the subject of decision in *United States*v. *Philipp Brothers Chemicals, Inc.,*46 Cust. Ct. 803, A.R.D. 134, the record in which case was incorporated herein by consent.

Following the cited decision, I find that the proper basis for ap-praisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and hold that such statutory value therefor, as shown in counsel’s stipulation of submission, is as follows:

> Date of exportation Value

> 9/17/59 through 12/7/60 $23.00 per 100 kilos, less ocean freight and insurance to New York

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-78709, 33-60443 and 33-60449) of Katy
Industries, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2004 relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Katy Industries, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K.
We also consent to the incorporation be reference of our report dated March 25,
2004 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form
10-K.

s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
April 29, 2004


                                       90
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TERRENCE BROWNLEE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1330 DFL PAN P

vs.

J. BURLESON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prison inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

rights action. On May 1, 2006, plaintiff filed his third motion for the appointment of counsel. 

Plaintiff's previous motions were filed on December 23, 2005, and January 23, 2006. All

motions were denied. In light of those orders, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s May 1,

2006, motion for the appointment of counsel is denied. 

DATED: May 30, 2006.

/mp/004

brow1330.31thr

Case 2:04-cv-01330-DFL-EFB Document 55 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 11

STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION

OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



|                                                                           |  |          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------
|                                                                           |  | SHARES   
|Basic Weighted Average Shares outstanding for the year ended June 30, 2008 |  | 1,867,948
|                                                                           |  |          



| |  |                          |  |  |  |   |           |  |   |  |                  |  | 
| |  | ------------------------ |  |  |  | - | --------- |  | - |  | ---------------- |  | 
| |  | Net income after tax     |  |  |  | $ | 1,865,757 |  | = |  | $ 1.00 per share |  | 
| |  | Basic shares outstanding |  |  |  |   | 1,867,948 |  |   |  |                  |  | 



|                                                                             |  |          
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------
|Diluted Weighted Average Shares outstanding for the year ended June 30, 2008 |  | 1,891,138
|                                                                             |  |          



| |  |                            |  |  |  |   |           |  |   |  |                  |  | 
| |  | -------------------------- |  |  |  | - | --------- |  | - |  | ---------------- |  | 
| |  | Net income after tax       |  |  |  | $ | 1,865,757 |  | = |  | $ 0.99 per share |  | 
| |  | Diluted shares outstanding |  |  |  |   | 1,891,138 |  |   |  |                  |  | 

Note: Basic earnings per common share are computed as earnings divided by weighted average basic shares
outstanding. Diluted shares outstanding includes the difference between 94,000 stock options outstanding at June 30, 2008 less 70,811 shares that could be purchased using the option exercise proceeds should all stock options be exercised,
weighted for the period these options were outstanding. Diluted shares outstanding also include those options that were exercised during fiscal 2008 (if any), weighted for the period before they were exercised. The total dilutive shares outstanding
related to stock options were 23,190. When a loss occurs, diluted earnings per common share and basic earnings per common share are the same.