alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Farling, Appellant, *v.*Urich.

*Judgments*— Opening *judgments*— Married *women*— Accommo*dation maker*— Evidence—Sufficiency.

A rule to open judgment is properly allowed where the testimony taken in support of the rule is sufficient to support a finding that defendant signed the note as surety for her husband, in settlement of debts contracted by him, that she received none of the proceeds, and that the appellant knew such to be the facts.

Under such circumstances, it is not an abuse of discretion by the court below to open the judgment.

Argued October 14, 1924.

Appeal, No. 14, March T., 1925, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. Dauphin County, Jan. T., 1920, No. 400, making absolute rule to open judgment in the case of Minnie V. Farling v. Samuel T. *106Urich and Mary J. Urich.

Before Orlady, P. J., Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

Rule to open judgment. Before Wickersham, J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

The court made absolute the rule. Defendant appealed.

*Error assigned*was the order of the court.

*F. Stoddard Simpson,*and with him *Lynn M. Irvine,*for appellant.

*George V. Hoover,*for appellee.

November 17, 1924:

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Judgment was entered in the court below in favor of Minnie Y. Farling, the appellant, against Samuel T. Urich and Mary J. Urich, as joint defendants, upon a judgment note or single bill confessing judgment, for $2,000; and within five years thereafter the same was revived by scire facias. Subsequently a writ of fieri facias was issued thereon and certain personal property of the defendant, Mary J. Urich, levied upon. She then presented her petition to the Court of Common Pleas of Dauphin County setting forth that she was the wife of her codefendant, Samuel T. Urich, that her signature to said judgment note had been obtained by duress of her husband, and solely as surety or accommodation maker for him; that she had no knowledge of the entry of said judgment or its revival by scire facias until the levy upon her property; and praying that the said judgment might be opened as to her and that she be let into a defense. The testimony taken on the rule granted pursuant to said petition is sufficient to support a' finding *107that Mary J. Urich signed the note as surety for her husband, in settlement of debts contracted by him, that she received none of the proceeds, and that appellant knew such to be the facts. The judgment against the defendants cm the scire facias was by default,, (Penna. Stave Co.’s App., 225 Pa. 178), and the record, as printed, fails to show personal service of the writ on the defendant, Mary J. Urich. Under the circumstances we find no abuse of discretion by the court below in opening' the judgment as to her. Its action is supported by the following decisions: Appeal of First National Bank of Muncy, 106 Pa. 68, 71; Eldred v. Hazlett’s Admr., 38 Pa. 16, 32; Manor National Bank v. Lowery, 242 Pa. 559.

The order is affirmed.
================================================================================

EXHIBIT 32.2   PATIENT PORTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

   Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
         (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

I, Thomas Hagan, Financial Officer of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 of the
Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13(a)[15(d)] of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Registrant.


Dated:  1/31/2007                        /s/ THOMAS HAGAN
                                         -----------------------
                                         Thomas Hagan
                                         Chief Financial Officer
















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4165 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4165

  To require the national instant criminal background check system to 
notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the relevant State 
 and local law enforcement agencies whenever information contained in 
 the system indicates that an alien who is illegally or unlawfully in 
           the United States attempted to receive a firearm.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2024

  Mr. Cotton (for himself, Mr. Tillis, Ms. Ernst, Ms. Lummis, and Mr. 
   Boozman) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the national instant criminal background check system to 
notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the relevant State 
 and local law enforcement agencies whenever information contained in 
 the system indicates that an alien who is illegally or unlawfully in 
           the United States attempted to receive a firearm.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Illegal Alien NICS Alert Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIRED NOTIFICATION BY NICS TO ICE AND STATE AND LOCAL LAW 
              ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OF ATTEMPTED RECEIPT OF FIREARM BY 
              ALIEN WHO IS ILLEGALLY OR UNLAWFULLY IN THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    Section 103(e) of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (34 
U.S.C. 40901(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(3) Notification to ice and state and local law 
        enforcement agencies of attempted receipt of firearm by person 
        illegally or unlawfully in the united states.--Whenever 
        information contained in the system established under this 
        section indicates that a prospective firearm transferee is 
        illegally or unlawfully in the United States, the system shall 
        automatically notify U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
        and relevant State and local law enforcement agencies that an 
        alien may have attempted to receive a firearm in violation of 
        section 922(g)(5)(A) of title 18, United States Code, and 
        include all relevant information contained in the system.''.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 44 (Wednesday, March 7, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 10195]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3991]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-312-000]


Enbridge Pipelines (KPC); Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas 
Tariff

March 1, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 28, 2007, Enbridge Pipelines (KPC) 
(KPC) tendered for filing as part its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheets to be made effective April 1, 
2007:

Ninth Revised Sheet No. 15
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 21
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 26
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 28
Ninth Revised Sheet No. 30
Seventh Revised Sheet No. 31A

    KPC states that copies of its transmittal letter and appendices 
have been mailed to all affected customers and interested state 
commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of 
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). 
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that 
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on 
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e6a0a3b4a5a9888a8f8883b5939696899492a680839485c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b5f3f0e7f6fadbd9dcdbd0e6c0c5c5dac7c1f5d3d0c7d69bd2dac3">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3991 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Jeffrey Marshall,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1657 DFL PAN P

vs. Order

Solano County Sheriff, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and

26-36, the following provisions shall govern discovery in this

action.

1. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 and Local Rule

5-135 and shall be filed only when required by Local Rules

30-250(a), 33-250(c), 34-250(c) and 36-250(c).

2. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due 45

days after the request is served.

Case 2:04-cv-01657-AK Document 41 Filed 08/24/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. Defendants may examine at deposition plaintiff and any

other prisoner provided that at least 14 days before such

examination, defendants serve all parties with the notice

required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(1).

4. If disputes arise about the parties' discovery

obligations, the parties shall comply with Rules 5, 7, 11, 26,

and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 5-134,

5-135, 6-136, 7-130, 7-131, 7-132, 11-110, 43-140, and 78-230(m)

of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District

Court, Eastern District of California. Unless otherwise ordered,

Local Rule 37-251 shall not apply. 

5. Filing a discovery motion that does not comply with all

applicable rules may result in imposition of sanctions including

but not limited to denial of the motion.

6. Good cause appearing, the July 7, 2005, findings and

recommendations are vacated. Defendants Cullinson, Castro,

Molloy and Headley answered August 12, 2005. Plaintiff must

ensure defendants Solano County Sheriff, Purcells, Sheppard,

Cullison and Pettaway are served, and has a duty to prosecute

this action against all defendants.

7. Plaintiff’s August 15, 2005, motion for extension of 

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-01657-AK Document 41 Filed 08/24/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

time to gather discovery and August 16, 2005, motion for

discovery are moot in light of this order. 

So ordered.

Dated: August 23, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01657-AK Document 41 Filed 08/24/05 Page 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7844

GEORGE H. VAN WAGNER, III, Plaintiff - Appellant, and
ANTHONY RISH; JOHN MCMAHON; LARRY DOLPH; DAVID H. ROBERTS, Plaintiffs,
versusSALLY JOHNSON, Doctor, in her official capacity as Associate Warden of Mental Health Services and Head of United States Public HealthServices at Butner Federal Correctional Institute and individually; CATHY HICKS, in her official capacity as Unit Manager, FederalCorrectional Institute Butner and individually; JIM KING, Case Manager, in his official capacity at Federal Correctional InstituteButner and individually; WILBER LEMAY, Counselor, in his official capacity at Federal Correctional Institute Butner and individually, Defendants - Appellees, and MICHAEL J. QUINLAN, as Director of Bureau ofPrisons in his official capacity and individually; US GOVERNMENT, Defendants.23Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-92-200-5-BR) Submitted: April 17, 1997 Decided: April 30, 1997 Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George H. Van Wagner, III, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court order dismissing his claims and denying various motions in a multi-plaintiff civil action. The action continues below on the other plaintiffs' claims. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23-b









             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby consent to the incorporation by reference  in  the
Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File Nos. 33-51799, 333-
18139 and 333-50396) and Form S-8 (File Nos. 33-45618 and 333-
32636)  of  Kansas City Power & Light Company of  our  report
dated February 20, 2001 relating to the financial statements,
which appears in this Form 10-K.


                               /s/PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP
                               PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP




Kansas City, Missouri
February 28, 2001
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LIONELL THOLMER, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1368 GEB CMK P

vs.

PLILER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file his objections to the January 5,

2007 findings and recommendations (doc. 32). Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's January 19, 2007 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file his

objections to the January 5, 2007 findings and recommendations. 

DATED: January 25, 2007.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01368-GEB -CMK Document 39 Filed 01/29/07 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated October 11, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-212829) of Smart Trust 270,
comprising Smart Trust, Strategic Growth & Income Trust, Series 10.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 11, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                             6,673
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                            3,877
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                              3,903
<EQUITIES>                                         929
<MORTGAGE>                                       1,323
<REAL-ESTATE>                                       75
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                  14,143
<CASH>                                             105
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               1,260
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                             934
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,562
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                 13,308
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                 40
<POLICY-OTHER>                                      71
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                              200
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                    614
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               53
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,562
<PREMIUMS>                                         994
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                893
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                  47
<OTHER-INCOME>                                     191
<BENEFITS>                                       1,211
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                         89
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                              (141)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    443
<INCOME-TAX>                                       149
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                294
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       291
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.09
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                     259
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                401
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                  (63)
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                 246
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                    91
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                    260
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4242 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 620
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4242

To extend the authorization of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought 
              Relief Act of 1991, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2024

 Mr. Hickenlooper (for himself, Ms. Lummis, and Mr. Wyden) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Energy and Natural Resources

                           November 21, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the authorization of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought 
              Relief Act of 1991, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drought Preparedness Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Drought Program.--Section 104(c) of the Reclamation States 
Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) is amended by 
striking ``2022'' and inserting ``2028''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 301 of the 
Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 
2241) is amended by striking ``2022'' and inserting ``2028''.
                                                       Calendar No. 620

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4242

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To extend the authorization of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought 
              Relief Act of 1991, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 21, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 4.3


 


Consent of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm


We consent to the
reference made to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Part B of the Prospectus
and to the use of our report dated October 26, 2016, in this Registration Statement (Form S-6 No. 333-212827) of Smart Trust 276,
comprising Smart Trust, Smart Ten Trust, Series 6.


 


	 	/s/ Grant Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 26, 2016