alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. on Form
      10-QSB/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I,
      Steven  J. Cohen, President of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. certify, pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(1)           The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Z Trim Holdings,
      Inc.




Dated:  November
                    16, 2007
              By:
              /s/ Steven
                J. CohenSteven
                  J. CohenPresident(Principal
                Executive
                Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Eddie Dunbar,

Petitioner, 2:04-cv-1176-GEB-PAN-P 

vs.

A. K. Schribner, et al.,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely filed a notice of appeal of

this court's June 28, 2005. denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. Before petitioner

can appeal this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R.

App. P. 22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only if the

applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues

satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. 

Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01176-GEB-PAN Document 29 Filed 01/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s June 2, 2005,findings and

recommendations, petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 26, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01176-GEB-PAN Document 29 Filed 01/26/06 Page 2 of 2
Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TIMOTHY JOHNSON, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

FEB 0 9 2023 

Bowen Greenwood Glerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana 

ORDER 

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until March 10, 2023, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant's reply brief. 

No further extensions will be granted. 

DATED this 9th day of February, 2023. 

For the Court, 

B3 /•

Chief Justice
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LARRY SHAW,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 200 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trey Resources, Inc. ("the Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark Meller,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.



                                        Date: May 14, 2004


                                        By /s/ Mark Meller
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Mark Meller
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer and Director
**EXHIBIT12.1**

 

**EARLE M.JORGENSEN COMPANY**

 

**STATEMENTOF COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**

**(dollarsin thousands)**

 
|                                                                 |   | **Year Ended  March 31,** |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|                                                                 |   | **2002**                  |   | **2003** |   | **2004** |   |
| Income before  income taxes                                          |   | $                         | 5,809  |   | $ | 3,882 |   | $ | 18,379 |   |
| Fixed charges to  be added back to earnings:                         |   |                      |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest and  debt expense, including capitalized interest           |   | 43,025                    |   | 47,753 |   | 51,234 |   |
| Rentals  (one-third of all rent and related costs charged to income) |   | 7,118                     |   | 7,219 |   | 7,434 |   |
| Total fixed  charges                                                 |   | 50,143                    |   | 54,972 |   | 58,668 |   |
| Amortization of  capitalized interest                                |   | —                    |   | 13 |   | 47 |   |
| Less capitalized  interest                                           |   | (316                      | )      | (464 | ) | (61 | ) |
| Earnings before  income taxes and fixed charges                      |   | $                         | 55,636 |   | $ | 58,403 |   | $ | 77,033 |   |
| Ratio of  earnings to fixed charges                                  |   | 1.11                      |   | 1.06 |   | 1.31 |   |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GYPSIE JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

PEREGRINE REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT

TRUST; WINSHIP PROPERTIES, A

CALIFORNIA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT

TRUST, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV.S. 04-0955 DFL CMK

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No.

CIV.S-04-0955 DFL CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: 6/9/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00955-DFL-CMK Document 21 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTO A. OLIVAS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1306 DFL CMK P

vs.

DARREL ADAMS, et al., 

Respondents. Order

 /

A recent court order was served on petitioner’s address of record and returned as

undeliverable because “name and number don’t match.” The court notes that this occurred

shortly after plaintiff filed a change of address with the court. 

The clerk is directed to attempt to re-serve a copy of the court’s April 12, 2005

order (doc 10) on plaintiff. 

DATED: May 9, 2005

S/Craig M. Kellison

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

Case 2:04-cv-01306-DFL-CMK Document 12 Filed 05/10/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 52575.

protests 89794-K, etc. (New York).

#### Alberto Cabouli et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Certain items of the merchandise stipulated to consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269 were held subject to an allowance for tare of inedible coverings of 2)4 percent from the net weight reported bj the United States Weigher.
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 8/8/2023 1

Extension for Overseas Voters in Wisconsin 

Romney for President, Inc. v. Wisconsin 

(William M. Conley, W.D. Wis. 3:12-cv-745) 

A presidential campaign sought an extension for absentee ballots 

because they were not mailed on time as required by the Uniformed 

and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act of 1986 (UOCAVA). 

The matter settled. 

Subject: Absentee and early voting. Topics: Uniformed and 

Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA); absentee 

ballots. 

Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign filed a federal complaint in Madison, 

Wisconsin, on October 12, 2012, seeking an extension of time for overseas 

voters to mail back their absentee ballots because Wisconsin had not mailed 

them out by forty-five days before the November 6 general election, as required by the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act of 1986 

(UOCAVA).1

 With its complaint, the campaign filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction.2

Western District of Wisconsin District Judge William M. Conley drew 

the case and set the matter for hearing on October 26.3 On October 24, the 

parties stipulated dismissal without prejudice.4

1. Complaint, Romney for President, Inc. v. Wisconsin, No. 3:12-cv-745 (W.D. Wis. Oct. 

12, 2012), D.E. 1; see Pub. L. No. 99-410, 100 Stat. 924, as amended, 52 U.S.C. §§ 20301–

20311; see also Mark Guarino, Romney Campaign Sues Over Absentee Ballots in Wisconsin, 

Christian Science Monitor, Oct. 15, 2012 (“The campaign . . . is concerned about 44 ballots 

that the state’s Government Accountability Board says were sent out by local election officials after the Sept. 22 deadline.”). See generally Robert Timothy Reagan, Overseas Voting: 

The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (Federal Judicial Center 2016). 

2. Motion, Romney for President, Inc., No. 3:12-cv-745 (W.D. Wis. Oct. 12, 2012), D.E. 2. 

3. Docket Sheet, id. (Oct. 12, 2012). 

4. Stipulation, id. (Oct. 24, 2012), D.E. 12.
Exhibit 12
<TABLE>
                    KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
          Computations of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        (Dollars in Thousands)
<CAPTION>


                                                         Year Ended December 31,
                                        1997         1996         1995         1994         1993
<S>                                   <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . .   $ 52,128     $ 96,274     $110,873     $104,526     $108,103
Taxes on Income . . . . . . . . . .     17,408       36,258       51,787       55,349       46,896
     Net Income Plus Taxes. . . . .     69,536      132,532      162,660      159,875      154,999

Fixed Charges:
  Interest on Long-Term Debt. . . .     46,062       46,304       47,073       47,827       53,908
  Interest on Other Indebtedness. .      4,388       11,758        5,190        5,183        6,075
  Interest on Corporate-owned
    Life Insurance Borrowings . . .     31,253       27,636       25,357       20,990       11,865
  Interest Applicable to Rentals. .     25,143       25,539       25,375       25,096       24,967
      Total Fixed Charges . . . . .    106,846      111,237      102,995       99,096       96,815

Earnings (1). . . . . . . . . . . .   $176,382     $243,769     $265,655     $258,971     $251,814

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.       1.65         2.19         2.58         2.61         2.60





(1)  Earnings are deemed to consist of net income to which has been added income taxes (including net
     deferred  investment  tax  credit)  and  fixed  charges.  Fixed  charges consist of all interest
     on  indebtedness, amortization  of debt  discount  and  expense, and the portion of rental
     expense which represents an interest factor.
</TABLE>
No. 48496.

#### Protests 836964-G, etc., of Bullock’s, Inc., et al., (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT LEONARDO SOCCOLICH and ) MILA PAPIC-SOCCOLICH, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-504 ) WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND ) SOCIETY, FSB, d/b/a CHRISTIANA ) TRUST, not in its individual capacity ) but solely as Trustee for Brougham ) Fund I Trust, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed July 12, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Lon Arend, Judge.Leonardo Soccolich and Mila PapicSoccolich, pro se. Shannon T. Sinai and Brandon S. Vesely of Albertelli Law, Tampa, for Appellee Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KHOUZAM, C.J., and LUCAS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK VALENZUELA, JR.,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0460 MCE JFM P

vs.

SCOTT KERNAN, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file and serve objections to the

June 22, 2005 findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s July 8, 2005 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Petitioner shall file and serve objections to the June 22, 2005 findings and

recommendations on or before August 1, 2005.

DATED: July 14, 2005. 

12/kf

vale0460.111 

Case 2:04-cv-00460-MCE -JFM Document 9 Filed 07/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:04-cv-00460-MCE -JFM Document 9 Filed 07/15/05 Page 2 of 2
```
Occupational Safety and Health: Differences Between Program in the United
States and Canada (Fact Sheet, 12/06/93, GAO/HRD-94-15FS).

Every year an estimated 1.7 million workers suffer disabling on-the-job
injuries; 10,500 of these workers die as a result of their injuries.  In
addition, 390,000 cases of occupational illnesses are diagnosed and
100,000 workers die each year as a result of work-related illnesses.  A
1991 industrial fire that killed 25 workers and injured more than 50
others renewed debate about whether the U.S. approach to ensuring
workplace safety and health could be improved.  The NAFTA negotiations
have focused attention on how workers are protected in the United
States, Mexico, and Canada.  This fact sheet (1) compares the U.S. and
Canadian programs for ensuring workplace safety and health and (2)
identifies issues to consider in improving safety and health in the
United States.

--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------

 REPORTNUM:  HRD-94-15FS
     TITLE:  Occupational Safety and Health: Differences Between Program 
             in the United States and Canada
      DATE:  12/06/93
   SUBJECT:  Occupational health/safety programs
             Occupational safety
             Foreign governments
             Comparative analysis
             Workers compensation
             Law enforcement
             Accident prevention
             State programs
             Federal/state relations
             Labor-management relations
IDENTIFIER:  United States-Canada Free Trade Area Agreement
             Canada
             North American Free Trade Agreement
             NAFTA
             Ontario
             Quebec
             British Columbia (Canada)
             
************************************************************************

We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.

See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or 
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]
```
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24(A)

                         AMERIPRISE CERTIFICATE COMPANY
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

City of Minneapolis
State of Minnesota

Each of the undersigned as a director of Ameriprise Certificate Company, a
face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940, hereby constitutes and appoints William F. (Ted) Truscott, Ross P.
Palacios, David K. Stewart, Scott R. Plummer and Christopher O. Petersen or any
one of them, as his or her attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign for him or her in
his or her name, place and stead any and all registration statements and
amendments thereto (with all exhibits and other documents required or desirable
in connection therewith) that may be prepared from time to time in connection
with said Company's existing or future face-amount certificate products--whether
pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Investment
Company Act of 1940 or otherwise--and periodic and other reports, and amendments
thereto, including those on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, as required
pursuant to provisions of applicable federal securities laws, and any necessary
or appropriate filings with states or other jurisdictions, and grants to any or
all of them the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
required or necessary or appropriate in connection with such signatures or
filings.

Signed on this 24th day of February, 2009


/s/ Rodney P. Burwell
-----------------------------------
Name: Rodney P. Burwell


/s/ Jean B. Keffeler
-----------------------------------
Name: Jean B. Keffeler


/s/ Thomas R. McBurney
-----------------------------------
Name: Thomas R. McBurney


/s/ Karen M. Bohn
-----------------------------------
Name: Karen M. Bohn
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Inconnection with the Annual Report of K-tel International, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kimmy Lockwood,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  Thereport fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| By                       | /s/   KIMMY LOCKWOOD |   |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------|--------|--------|
| Kimmy Lockwood                |                      |   |
| *Principal Financial Officer* |                      |   |
| November 22, 2006             |                      |   |

 

----
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII  &"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"December 2018
No. 46093.

#### Protests 32778-K, etc., of F. B. Vandergrift & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise- consists of ginger root similar to that the subject of *Wilson v. United States*(28 C. C. P. A. 63, C. A. D. 126). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1768 -was therefore sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10394)

Entry No. 32288.

#### James G. Wiley, a/c Abbey Rents Co. *v.*United States

(Decided December 10, 1962)

*Stein & ShostaTc*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Johnson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement enumerated on the attached Schedule, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of wood articles, manufactured by Hida Sangyo Co. Ltd. and exported from Japan.

> *484That all the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

> XT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule is not included on the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Section 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, required to be valued in accordance with Section 402(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit values, net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal for reap-praisement may be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the wooden articles involved herein and that such value is represented by the invoiced unit values, net, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.