alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1.a

CERTIFICATIONS

 

I, Michael J. Chesser, certify that: 
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Great Plains Energy Incorporated;  
2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report:  
4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:   
(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   
(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   
(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and  
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   
(a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   
(b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:
March 10, 2004 
/s/Michael J. Chesser   
Michael J. Chesser
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date of Notice:

KEVIN MITCHELL : July 23, 2003

 vs. :

EXPERIAN INFORMATION : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4442

SOLUTIONS, INC.

TAKE NOTICE that the above-captioned matter is

scheduled for JURY TRIAL in the United States District Court,

United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA,

before the Honorable John P. Fullam, on November 17, 2003, at

10:00 A.M., in Courtroom No. 15-A.

If trial counsel is on trial or otherwise engaged at

the time of the scheduled trial, another attorney in such trial

counsel's office should appear.

THE MATTER WILL BE CONTINUED TO ANOTHER DATE ONLY IN

EXCEPTIONAL CASES.

Very truly yours,

Rosalind Burton-Hoop

Deputy Clerk to Judge Fullam

COPIES BY MAIL ON 7/23/03 TO: Mark D. Mailman, Esquire

 Howard R. Maniloff, Esquire

 John Keim Semler, Esquire

 Joseph F. Riga, Esquire

 Robert J. Martin, Esquire

 Shweta Gupta, Esquire

Case 2:02-cv-04442-JF Document 31 Filed 07/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
unis-ex105_931.htm



Exhibit 10.5

February 5, 2016

Amgen Inc.

One Amgen Center Drive

Thousand Oaks  CA  91320-1799

Attention:  Corporate Secretary

Re:    Amendment of Exclusivity Letter

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Unilife Corporation (“Unilife”) and Amgen Inc. (“Amgen” and, together with Unilife, the “Parties”) entered into an exclusivity letter agreement dated December 31, 2015 (the “Exclusivity Letter”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined in this letter shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Exclusivity Letter.

Pursuant to Section 13 of the Exclusivity Letter, the Parties intend to hereby amend the Exclusivity Letter, and agree that the Exclusivity Period in Section 1(a) of the Exclusivity Letter shall be extended through and to 11:59 pm Pacific Time on Monday, February 15, 2016 so long as the Parties continue to negotiate in good faith a Transaction. 

 


	
Very truly yours,

	
 

	
UNILIFE CORPORATION

	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ John Ryan

	
Name:
	
 
	
John Ryan

	
Title:
	
 
	
SVP, General Counsel & Secretary




 

CONFIRMED AND AGREED TO:

 

AMGEN INC.

 


	
By:
	
 
	
/s/ David Piacquad

	
Name:
	
 
	
David Piacquad

	
Title:
	
 
	
Sr. Vice President,

	
 
	
 
	
Business Development
Exhibit 12



KANSAS GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY

Computations of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Dollars in Thousands)



|                                                      |  | Year Ended December 31,
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                                                      |  | 2002                   
|Earnings from continuing operations                   |  | $                      
|                                                      |  |                        
|Fixed Charges:                                        |  |                        
|Interest expense                                      |  |                        
|Interest on Corporate-owned Life Insurance Borrowings |  |                        
|Interest Applicable to Rentals                        |  |                        
|                                                      |  |                        
|Total Fixed Charges                                   |  |                        
|                                                      |  |                        
|                                                     
|Earnings (a)                                          |  | $                      
|                                                      |  |                        
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                    |  |                        



|(a) |  | Earnings are deemed to consist of earnings from continuing operations and fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of all interest on indebtedness, amortization of debt
discount and expense, and the portion of rental expense which represents an interest factor.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 55244.

#### Nopco Chemical Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 165487-K (A) and 165488-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code, the undersigned officer of Genesis HealthCare Corporation (the "Company")
does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form
10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




Date: February 9, 2005                               /s/ James V. McKeon
      ----------------                               --------------------------
                                                     James V. McKeon
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES L. DAVIS, a.k.a.,

MICHAEL EL. HOLMES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1390 LKK EFB P

vs.

TERESA S. SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This

action proceeds on plaintiff’s December 20, 2004, amended complaint, which defendant

answered on June 26, 2006. On July 24, 2006, plaintiff filed an amended complaint without

complying with the requirements of Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R.

Civ. P.”).

“A party may amend the party’s pleading as a matter of course at any time before a

responsive pleading is served . . .,” after which, “a party may amend the party’s pleading only by

leave of court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be freely given when

justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). Because defendant filed an answer on June 26, 2006,

plaintiff must first move for leave to amend or obtain the written stipulation of the defendants

prior to filing an amended complaint. Plaintiff has done neither.

Case 2:04-cv-01390-LKK -EFB Document 52 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s July 24, 2006, amended complaint is

disregarded and the Clerk of the Court shall make a notation to that effect on the docket.

Dated: November 1, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-01390-LKK -EFB Document 52 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 2
February 5, 1945

No. 50009.

#### Protest 981860-G of Republic Steel Corporation.

C. D. 903. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

###### Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards

The ACRS Subcommittee on Reliability and Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) will hold a meeting on March 22, 2007, Room T-2B1, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. 

The entire meeting will be open to public attendance. 

The agenda for the subject meeting shall be as follows:

*Thursday, March 22, 2007—8:30 a.m. until the conclusion of business.*      ( print page 9782)    

The Subcommittee will review the staff's plans for evaluating the agency's human reliability analysis models in an effort to propose either a single model for the agency to use or guidance on which model(s) should be used in specific circumstances. The Subcommittee will hear presentations by and hold discussions with representatives of the NRC staff and industry regarding this matter. The Subcommittee will gather information, analyze relevant issues and facts, and formulate proposed positions and actions, as appropriate, for deliberation by the full Committee. 

Members of the public desiring to provide oral statements and/or written comments should notify the Designated Federal Official, Dr. Hossein P. Nourbakhsh, (Telephone: 301-415-5622) five days prior to the meeting, if possible, so that appropriate arrangements can be made. Electronic recordings will be permitted. 

Further information regarding this meeting can be obtained by contacting the Designated Federal Official between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. (ET). Persons planning to attend this meeting are urged to contact the above named individual at least two working days prior to the meeting to be advised of any potential changes to the agenda. 

Dated: February 23, 2007. 

Cayetano Santos, 

Acting Branch Chief, ACRS.

[FR Doc. E7-3824 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
No. 58026.

protests 179858-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Wool Distributing Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in *465paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CELESTINO A. JAPNGIE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 2101

[ October 19, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit ; Palm Beach County, John S. Kastrenakis

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 2011CF007202A

.

Celestino A. Japngie, Doral , pro se.

No brief filed for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

G ROSS

, F ORST and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 22

                       K N ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name of Company                                                                        State of Incorporation
---------------                                                                        ----------------------
<S>                                                                                              <C>
AOG Gas Transmission Company, L.P.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Texas
American Gas Storage, L.P.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Texas
American Gathering, L.P.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Texas
American Oil & Gas Corporation  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Delaware
American Pipeline Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Delaware
American Processing, L.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Texas
Caprock Pipeline Company  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Delaware
K N Energy Services, Inc.   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Colorado
K N Gas Gathering, Inc.   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Colorado
K N Marketing, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Colorado
K N Marketing, L.P. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Delaware
K N Natural Gas, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Colorado
K N Gas Supply Services, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Colorado
K N Interstate Gas Transmission Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Colorado
K N Production Company  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Delaware
K N Trading, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Delaware
K N Wattenberg Transmission Limited Liability Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Colorado
K N WesTex Gas Service Company  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Texas
Northern Gas Company  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Wyoming
Red River Pipeline, L.P.  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Delaware
Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Colorado
Westar Transmission Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .      Delaware
</TABLE>


All of the subsidiaries named above are included in the consolidated financial
statements of the Registrant included herein.








 
                                       67
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAMON ALLGIRE

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1680 MCE GGH P

vs.

WARDEN R.A. CASTRO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action

filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed December 2, 2004, plaintiff’s complaint was

dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has now filed an amended

complaint.

The amended complaint states a cognizable claim for relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of the amended complaint are proven,

plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action. By concurrently

filed Findings and Recommendations, dismissal is recommended for several defendants. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendants: J. W. Rohlfing, O.

Case 2:04-cv-01680-MCE -GGH Document 10 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1The claims against defendant Woodford are found cognizable only in her official

capacity. See concurrently filed Findings and Recommendations.

2

Dickinson, R. W. Sandham, S. M. Roche, J. S. Woodford.1 

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff five (5) USM-285 forms, one

summons, an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed January 31, 2005.

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;

b. One completed summons;

c. One completed USM-285 form for each defendant listed in number 1

above; and 

d. Six (6) copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed January 31,

2005. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendants and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States

Marshal to serve the above-named defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4

without payment of costs. 

DATED: 6/17/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

allg1680.1am

Case 2:04-cv-01680-MCE -GGH Document 10 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAMON ALLGIRE

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1680 MCE GGH P

vs.

WARDEN R.A. CASTRO, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 1 completed summons form

 5 completed USM-285 forms

 6 copies of the January 31, 2005 

 Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-01680-MCE -GGH Document 10 Filed 06/17/05 Page 3 of 3
No. 63090.

#### Republic Chemical Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 58/12324 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Exhibit 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Trey Resources, Inc. ("the Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ("the Report"), I, Mark Meller,
President, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

1.   The Report containing the financial statements for the Company fully
     complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
     Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        Date: August 12, 2004

                                        By /s/ Mark Meller
                                        -----------------------------------
                                        Mark Meller
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer and Director
No. 54628.

#### Stern Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 128441-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.