alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3917 

To require the Secretary of Commerce to reimpose duties on steel imported 

into the United States from Mexico, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2024 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. CASEY, Mr. SCOTT

of Florida, Mr. BUDD, Ms. WARREN, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. VANCE, and Mr. 

BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Commerce to reimpose duties 

on steel imported into the United States from Mexico, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Mexico’s Steel 

5 Surge Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3917 IS

1 SEC. 2. REIMPOSITION OF DUTIES ON AND ESTABLISH2 MENT OF QUOTAS OR TARIFF RATE QUOTAS 

3 FOR STEEL IMPORTED INTO THE UNITED 

4 STATES FROM MEXICO. 

5 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con6 gress that— 

7 (1) the Government of Mexico is in material 

8 breach of the commitments made under the Joint 

9 Statement; and 

10 (2) that material breach has caused significant 

11 damage to the steel industry in the United States, 

12 which is vital to the national security of the United 

13 States. 

14 (b) REIMPOSITION OF DUTIES.— 

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to section 232 of 

16 the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 (19 U.S.C. 1862), 

17 for a period of not less than one year, the Secretary 

18 of Commerce shall impose duties on steel imported 

19 into the United States from Mexico equivalent to the 

20 duties that were in place on May 16, 2019. 

21 (2) LIFTING OF DUTIES.—The Secretary of 

22 Commerce may not decrease or eliminate the duties 

23 required to be imposed under paragraph (1) unless 

24 the Secretary of Commerce and the United States 

25 Trade Representative certify to Congress that— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3917 IS

1 (A) the Government of Mexico has adopted 

2 policies and practices to bring that Government 

3 into compliance with the terms of the Joint 

4 Statement; and 

5 (B) the Secretary of Commerce and the 

6 United States Trade Representative are con7 fident that the Government of Mexico will 

8 maintain the policies necessary to remain in 

9 compliance with its commitments to the United 

10 States in connection with the Joint Statement. 

11 (c) QUOTAS OR TARIFF RATE QUOTAS.—The Presi12 dent may impose supplementary quotas or tariff rate 

13 quotas on steel imported into the United States from Mex14 ico to ensure that imports of steel into the United States 

15 from Mexico return to historic volumes of trade, as speci16 fied under the Joint Statement. 

17 (d) JOINT STATEMENT DEFINED.—In this section, 

18 the term ‘‘Joint Statement’’ means the Joint Statement 

19 by the United States and Mexico on Section 232 Duties 

20 on Steel and Aluminum, agreed to on May 17, 2019. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 31(b)
                                                                   -------------

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

I, Anthony Christon, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jaclyn, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
     controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
     that material information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
     entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
     prepared;

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
     the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
     fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
     annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
     materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
     summarize and report financial information; and

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
     over financial reporting.

Date: September 24, 2003


/s/ ANTHONY CHRISTON
----------------------------------------------
Anthony Christon, Principal Financial Officer
# sec5_snc_2019

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SNC - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2018
Before the First Division,

November 18, 1954

No. 58515.

protests 167073-K, etc. (Detroit).

#### F. S. Whelan & Sons et al. *v.*United States,

*428Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *E. Dillingham, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 555), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1805 as pickets was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

October 16, 1951

No. 55924.

protests 138086-K and 138879-K (New York).

#### B. Westergaard & Co. *v.*United States,

*329Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese knives without handles, with blades less than 6 inches in length, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. Westergaard & Co.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 77, C. D. 1302), except that the instant merchandise was imported without handles, whereas the merchandise involved in C. D. 1302 had handles of a material similar to celluloid, pyroxylin, or casein, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 
                               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Essex Portfolio, L.P. on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the "Report"), I, Keith R. Guericke, Chief
Executive Officerof Essex Property Trust, Inc., the general partner of
the registrant Essex Portfolio, L.P., hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

May 17, 2004

By: /s/ KEITH R. GUERICKE

Keith R. Guericke
                  Chief Executive Officer

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DWAYNE EICHLER,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1108 GEB JFM P

vs.

CDC OFFICER SHERBIN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On

December 23, 2005, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Opposition to Third Amended

Complaint.” Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows:

There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim

denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a

cross-claim; a third-party complaint, if a person who was not an original

party is summoned under the provisions of Rule 14; and a third-party

answer, if a third-party complaint is served. No other pleading shall be

allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a thirdparty answer. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) (emphasis added). The court has not ordered plaintiff to reply to defendants’

answer and declines to make such an order.

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01108-GEB-JFM Document 53 Filed 02/07/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s

December 23, 2005 opposition will be placed in the court file and disregarded.

DATED: February 7, 2006.

/001; eich1108.frcp7

Case 2:04-cv-01108-GEB-JFM Document 53 Filed 02/07/06 Page 2 of 2
-1-

Case No. 

04-1005 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS R. 1, T, AND A PORTION OF EXHIBIT B OF 

THE DECLARATION OF ERICK C. HOWARD, AND A PORTION OF THE DECLARATION OF PETER J. MINEGAR 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

S H

A

R T S I S F

R I E S E L L P

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3598

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

FRANK A. CIALONE (Bar #172816) 

ERICK C. HOWARD (Bar #214107) 

One Maritime Plaza, 18th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-3598 

Telephone: (415) 421-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 421-2922 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MINEGAR ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 

INC., AND PETER J. MINEGAR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CONCRETE WASHOUT SYSTEMS, INC., a 

California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MINEGAR ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 

INC., a California corporation, PETER J. 

MINEGAR, and DOES 1 - 10, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. CIV.S-04-1005 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST TO 

FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS R. 1, T, 

AND A PORTION OF EXHIBIT B OF 

THE DECLARATION OF ERICK C. 

HOWARD IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND A 

PORTION OF THE DECLARATION OF 

PETER J. MINEGAR IN SUPPORT OF 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 

SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Date: July 11, 2005 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Courtroom: 5 

District Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb 

The Court considered the Request to File Under Seal Exhibits R. 1, T and a Portion of 

Exhibit B of the Declaration of Erick C. Howard in Support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary 

Judgment, and a Portion of the Declaration of Peter J. Minegar in Support of Defendants’ Motion 

for Summary Judgment. For good cause appearing: 

/ / / / / 

/ / / / / 

/ / / / / 

Case 2:04-cv-01005-WBS-DAD Document 70 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 2
-2-

Case No. 

04-1005 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS R. 1, T, AND A PORTION OF EXHIBIT B OF 

THE DECLARATION OF ERICK C. HOWARD, AND A PORTION OF THE DECLARATION OF PETER J. MINEGAR 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

S H

A

R T S I S F

R I E S E L L P

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3598

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Request is GRANTED. The Exhibits R. 1, T, a 

portion of Exhibit B of the Declaration of Erick C. Howard and Paragraph 14 of the Declaration of 

Peter J. Minegar shall be filed under seal. The party who files the exhibits under seal shall make 

sure that copies the exhibits in their entirety, unsealed, are provided along with the copies of the 

papers which are submitted to the judges’ chambers at the time the exhibits are filed. 

DATED: June 2, 2005 

NAB\6773\001\1309398.01 

Case 2:04-cv-01005-WBS-DAD Document 70 Filed 06/03/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES H. JERNIGAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1280 GEB JFM P

vs.

WARDEN CLAUDE E. FINN, 

et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has

filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On March 16, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and

which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

Case 2:04-cv-01280-GEB -JFM Document 27 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 16,

2005, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 

Dated: April 25, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01280-GEB -JFM Document 27 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Ross P. Palacios, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                              
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










Date:  February 25, 2016By/s/   Abu M. ArifAbu M. ArifChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)








Date:  February 25, 2016By/s/   Ross P. PalaciosRoss P. PalaciosChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)





E-5
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3434]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

Order No. 1501


Approval for Expansion of Authority for Subzone 99E The Premcor 
Refining Group Inc. (Oil Refinery), Delaware City, DE

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:
    Whereas, the Delaware Economic Development Office, grantee of FTZ 
99, has requested authority on behalf of The Premcor Refining Group 
Inc. (Premcor), to expand the scope of manufacturing activity conducted 
under zone procedures within Subzone 99E at the Premcor refinery in 
Delaware City, Delaware (FTZ Docket 21-2006, filed 5/31/2006);
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment has been given in the 
Federal Register (71 FR 34303, 6/14/2006);
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
Board's regulations would be satisfied, and that approval of the 
application would be in the public interest if approval is subject to 
the conditions listed below;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to expand the scope of manufacturing authority 
under zone procedures within Subzone 99E, is approved, subject to the 
FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Sec.  400.28, and 
subject to the following conditions:
    1. Foreign status (19 CFR Sec.  146.41, 146.42) products consumed 
as fuel for the petrochemical complex shall be subject to the 
applicable duty rate.
    2. Privileged foreign status (19 CFR Sec.  146.41) shall be elected 
on all foreign merchandise admitted to the subzone, except that non-
privileged foreign (NPF) status (19 CFR Sec.  146.42) may be elected on 
refinery inputs covered under HTSUS Subheadings <greek-i>2709.00.10, 
<greek-i>2709.00.20, <greek-i>2710.11.25, <greek-i>2710.11.45, 
<greek-i>2710.19.05, <greek-i>2710.19.10, <greek-i>2710.19.45, 
<greek-i>2710.91.00, <greek-i>2710.99.05, <greek-i>2710.99.10, 
<greek-i>2710.99.16, <greek-i>2710.99.21 and <greek-i>2710.99.45 which 
are used in the production of:
    -petrochemical feedstocks (examiners report, Appendix ``C'');
    -products for export;
    -and, products eligible for entry under HTSUS <greek-i>9808.00.30 
and <greek-i>9808.00.40 (U.S. Government purchases).
    Signed at Washington, DC, this 12th day of February 2007.

David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Import Administration.
Alternate Chairman Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3434 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
Exhibit













Page 1







June 10, 2010






Bernard Shay
Vice President Law and General Counsel
Miramar Labs, Inc.
445 Indio Way
Sunnyvale, CA 94085
		
	Re:
	Assignment and License Agreement between The Foundry, Inc. (“Inc.”) and Miramar Labs, Inc. (“Miramar”) dated December 31, 2008 (the “Agreement”).


Dear Mr. Shay:
As discussed, The Foundry, LLC (“LLC”) and Miramar wish to clarify any ambiguity regarding Miramar’s rights in and to certain patents and related technology under the Agreement as a result of Inc.’s transfer of assets to LLC as set forth in the following agreements between Inc. and LLC effective as of December 31, 2008: the Bill of Sale, the Assumption Agreement and the Revised and Restated Assignment Agreement (collectively, the “Asset Documents”). This letter sets forth the agreement and understanding of LLC and Miramar with regard to Inc.’s assignment and license of certain patent rights and related technology to Miramar under the Agreement. All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.
1.    LLC hereby confirms and agrees that the Assigned Patents, Assigned Technology and Related Documentation were in fact assigned to Miramar, subject to the terms of the Agreement, prior to Inc.’s transfer of assets to LLC pursuant to the Asset Documents.
2.    LLC and Miramar hereby agree that the Agreement was effectively assigned by Inc. to LLC pursuant to the Asset Documents, and accordingly LLC hereby agrees to be bound by the terms of the Agreement, including, without limitation, all assignments, licenses and obligations of Inc. set forth therein, and Miramar agrees to perform its obligations to Inc. set forth therein, as if LLC were the named party thereto.
We appreciate your time and attention to this matter and look forward to continuing our business relationship with Miramar.
Sincerely, 
/s/ Hanson S. Gifford
Hanson S. Gifford
President and CEO
The Foundry, LLC


Document3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 05-_________

:

v. : DATE FILED: 

:

KENNETH H. WATERSTRADT :

 : VIOLATION: 

: 18 U.S.C. § 2423(a) 

: (transporting a minor for sex -- 1 count)

I N F O R M A T I O N

COUNT ONE

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES THAT:

On or about June 2, 2005, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, in the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania, and elsewhere, defendant

KENNETH H. WATERSTRADT,

knowingly transported an individual who had not attained the age of 18 years, known to the

United States Attorney and identified here as S.S., in interstate commerce with intent that the

individual engage in sexual activity for which the defendant could be charged with a criminal

offense.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 2423(a).

 

PATRICK L. MEEHAN

United States Attorney