alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Daniel C. Wright,  the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
GolfGear International,  Inc. (the "Company"),  certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, that to the best of
my knowledge:

(1)   the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the period  ended
      September 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of the
      Company.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.

Dated:  July 27, 2005                        /s/ Daniel C. Wright
                                             Daniel C. Wright
                                             Chief Executive Officer and
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Zuosheng Yu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 10, 2011
By:
/s/ Zuosheng YuZuosheng YuChief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID EARL WALKER, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1671 GEB KJM P

vs.

K. CLEMENT, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Defendants have requested an extension of time to comply with this court's

August 9, 2006 order. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ August 22, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Defendants are granted until September 1, 2006 to comply with this court’s

August 9, 2006 order.

DATED: August 23, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

walk1671.36

Case 2:04-cv-01671-GEB -KJM Document 40 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



                                   EXHIBIT 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF THE COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                                                 Organized                          Percentage of Voting
---                                                                Under Laws of                         Securities Owned By
                                                                   -------------                             Keane, Inc.
                                                                                                             ----------
<S>                                                                <C>                                          <C>
Dataskills, Inc.                                                   Massachusetts                                100%
Keane Federal Systems, Inc.                                           Delaware                                  100%
Keane Canada, Inc.                                                     Canada                                   100%
169963 Canada, Inc.                                                    Canada                                   100%
Keane Securities Corporation                                       Massachusetts                                100%
Keane Technology Services Company                                    California                                 100%
Keane Consulting Group                                                Illinois                                  100%
(formerly Bricker & Associates, Inc.)
Keane Limited, Inc.                                                United Kingdom                               100%
Keane Tech, LLC                                                       Delaware                                  100%
Keane Business Trust                                               Massachusetts                                100%
Keane Care, Inc.                                                     Washington                                 100%
 (formerly Care Computer Systems, Inc.)
Keane Service Company                                                California                                 100%
SignalTree Solutions Holdings, Inc.                                   Delaware                                  100%
SignalTree Solutions, Inc.                                            Delaware                                  100%
SignalTree Solutions (India) Holdings, Inc.                           Delaware                                  100%
SignalTree Solutions (India) Ltd.                                      India                                    100%
Metamor (Mauritius) Ltd. One                                         Mauritius                                  100%
Metamor (Mauritius) Ltd. Two                                         Mauritius                                  100%
</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TINA M. EQUELS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1567 FCD KJM P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 30, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01567-FCD-KJM Document 3 Filed 03/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 30, 2005, are adopted in full;

and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R.

Civ. P. 41(b). 

DATED:March 21, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01567-FCD-KJM Document 3 Filed 03/22/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Gregory F. Ehlinger, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Irwin FinancialCorporation;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
    /s/ Gregory F. Ehlinger
No. 6110.

#### WIDOW M. GLENNON vs. J. H. HOLMES.

Syllabus.

1. R. C. C., 2280, which provides that where a lost instrument is made the foundation of a suit it must appear that the loss has been advertised within a reasonable time, etc., prescribes a rule of evidence merely; and consequently it is not essential to the statement of a cause of action úpon a lost instrument that the petition should allege that the loss has been advertised.

2. The loss of an instrument may in a proper case be advertised as well after as before suit is instituted thereon, since all that R. C. C., 2280, requires is that the loss be advertised within a reasonable time.

Appeal from the. Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, Division “D,’’ No. 85,018. Honorable Porter Parker, Judge.

Rickard & Yidrine, Hall, Monroe & Lemann, for plaintiff and appellant.

Dinkelspiel, Hart &■ Davey, for defendant and appellee.

His Honor, EMILE GODCHAUX,

rendered the opinion and decree of the Court, as follows:

*4Plaintiff declared upon a written promise of defendant to pay her a snm of money, the petition reciting that the document is annexed to and made part of the petition. By supplemental petition, filed after a prayer for oyer had been interposed by defendant, plaintiff alleges, among other things, that though the document had been attached to the original petition, it was subsequently lost and cannot be found nor produced. Defendant thereupon filed a plea of no cause of action; and the trial Court having sustained the plea and dismissed the suit, plaintiff appeals.

Defendant’s contention is that the petition fails to state a cause of action because there is no allegation therein that the loss of the instrument sued upon has been advertised in accordance with R. C. C., 2280, which provides that where a lost instrument is the foundation of a suit, it must appear that its loss has been advertised within a reasonable time.

The contention cannot be sustained. R. C. C., 2280 does not announce a principle of substantive law or of pleading, but a rule of evidence merely.

Beebe vs. McNeill, 8 A., 130.

And since R. C. C., 2280 does not confer a right, but prescribes only the manner in which the existence of a right may be proved, it is not essential to the statement of a cause of action upon a lost instrument that the petition should recite that the loss has been advertised, for a pleader is not required to disclose in his petition the proof upon which he relies nor the manner in which he proposes to establish his case.

Moreover, all that R. C. C. 2280 demands is that the loss should be advertised within a reasonable time; and cl-aar*5ly, in a proper case, this may be done as well after as before suit is brought upon the lost instrument.

Opinion and decree, November 8th. 1915.

Rehearing refused, December 6th, 1915.

Weaver vs. Cox, 15 A., 463.

It is accordingly adjudged and decreed that tbe judgment be annulled and set aside and tbe cause remanded for further proceedings according to Jaw.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 123 (Monday, June 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 37343]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-16019]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, National 
Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of section 
131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The Department is 
providing notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under the 
Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear Energy 
Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of Canada and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the United States of America and the 
European Atomic Energy Community.

DATES: This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than July 
12, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Sean Oehlbert, Office of 
Nonproliferation and International Security, National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Department of Energy. Telephone: 202-586-3806 or e-
mail: Sean.Oehlbert@nnsa.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This subsequent arrangement concerns the 
retransfer of 924,556 kg of U.S.-origin natural uranium hexafluoride 
(UF6) (67.60% U), 625,000 kg of which is uranium, from Cameco 
Corporation (Cameco) in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, to URENCO in 
Capenhurst Works, Chester, United Kingdom. The material, UF6 produced 
from U.S.-origin concentrates, which currently is located at Cameco, 
will be transferred to URENCO for toll-enrichment at their Capenhurst 
UK facility. The material originally was obtained by Cameco from Crowe 
Butte Resources, Inc. pursuant to export license XSOU8798. In 
accordance with section 131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement 
concerning the retransfer of nuclear material of United States origin 
will not be inimical to the common defense and security.

    Dated: May 17, 2011.

    For the Department of Energy.
Anne M. Harrington,
Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2011-16019 Filed 6-24-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9950-9951]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3852]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel: Agricultural Center Review, Program Announcement (PAR) 
06-057

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces a meeting of the aforementioned Special 
Emphasis Panel.

    Times and Dates: 8 a.m.-5 p.m., April 10, 2007 (Closed). 8 a.m.-
12 p.m., April 11, 2007 (Closed).
    Place: Renaissance Hotel, 107 6th Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, 
telephone (412) 562-1200.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include the review, 
discussion, and evaluation of research grant applications in

[[Page 9951]]

response to PAR 06-057, ``Agricultural Center Review.''
    For Further Information Contact: Stephen Olenchock, Scientific 
Review Administrator, 1095 Willowdale Road, Morgantown, WV 26506, 
telephone (304) 285-6271.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both CDC and the Agency for Toxic Substances and 
Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-3852 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P