alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
September 24, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARY SHAVERS, ERMA HARRIS, WANDA COLLINS, DIANA OFFORD, 

JOEL COCKRELL, CHARLES RANDLE, WALTER DAVIS, REVERAND 

GILMORE, BINNIE SHELLEY, GLORIA SIMMONS, BENNY SOLOMON, 

MERCHERA BURRELL, JAMES BURRELL, CAROLYN RANDLE, BESSIE 

COCKRELL, MARY ANDERSON, ROBERT BLACKMAN, OSCAR 

COCKRELL, WINTER GORDON, JR, EDDIE ANDERSON, TOMMY 

BLACKMON, JOHN BLACKMON, DONALD RODGERS, JOYCE STEIN, 

ELLA BANKS, VIOLA RANDLE, ROSIE BEAL, GOKI DEVELOPMENT 

CORPORATION, Appellants

NO. 14-15-00169-CV V.

LINEBARGER GOGGAN BLAIR & SAMPSON, FORT BEND COUNTY TAX 

ASSESSOR COLLECTOR, AND FORT BEND APPRAISAL DISTRICT, 

Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

order signed by the court below on January 6, 2015. Having considered the motion 

and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Diogu Kalu Diogu II.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TOM L. CAREY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:04-cv-1225 MCE AC P 

ORDER 

 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has submitted a request to file a motion to compel. ECF No. 375. 

 Plaintiff wishes to file a motion to compel the court to send him a copy of the November 

4, 2015 order. Id. He also alleges that defendant refuses to send him a copy of the order. Id. 

The court did not issue a written order on November 4, 2015. The court’s only docket entry on 

November 4, 2015, was a minute entry memorializing the hearing that took place the same day. 

ECF No. 370. The Clerk of the Court will be directed to send plaintiff a copy of the minute entry. 

However, the court assumes that plaintiff is actually seeking a copy of the order and findings and 

recommendations setting forth the undersigned’s reasons for recommending defendant’s motion 

to enforce the settlement agreement be granted. The findings and recommendations were not 

filed until November 18, 2015 (ECF No. 374), three days after plaintiff certifies that he submitted 

his request for mailing (ECF No. 375 at 3). The court assumes that plaintiff has since received 

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 376 Filed 11/30/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

the November 18, 2015 order and findings and recommendations. 

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. Plaintiff’s request to file a motion to compel (ECF No. 375) is denied. 

 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a copy of the November 4, 2015 

minute entry (ECF No. 370). 

DATED: November 30, 2015 

 

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 376 Filed 11/30/15 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

Richard M. Deneau, President and Chief Executive Officer and Darrin J. Campbell,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Anchor Glass Container
Corporation, hereby certify that:

      1.    The quarterly report of the registrant on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the quarterly report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the registrant as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the quarterly
report.

Date: May 6, 2004

/s/ Richard M. Deneau
--------------------------------------------
Name: Richard M. Deneau
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Darrin J. Campbell
--------------------------------------------
Name: Darrin J. Campbell
Title: Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
1 

# FILED
November 25, 1997 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE

TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE , ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs/Appellants, ) Davidson Chancery ) ) Vs. ) Supreme Court ) No. 01S01-9711-CH-00242 ) BROOK THOMPSON, in his official ) capacity as the State Elec tion ) Coordinator, et al., ) ) Defendants/Appellees. )

O R D E R We granted this expedited appeal pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 16-3- 201(d) in order to determine a question of unusual public i mportance--whether 1997 Tenn. Pub. Acts, ch. 98, (“the Ac t”), violates the Tenness ee Constitution. The Chancery Court held that the Act is constitutional . We conclude, however, that the Act violates Articl e II, § 17 of the Tennessee Constitutio n because the body of the Act is broader than its c aption. Accordingly, we reverse. A full opinion based on this orde r will follo w. IT IS SO ORDERED.
PER CURIAM
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM JACKSON KITCHENS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1206 MCE PAN P

vs.

PAT HOUGE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is an individual housed at Coalinga State Hospital pursuant to California

Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 19, 2005, plaintiff filed a document styled “Plaintiff’s

Objection to Defendant’s Answer and Demand for Jury Trial.” The court construes this

document as a reply to the answer to plaintiff’s complaint filed by defendant Houge on December

5, 2005.

Rule 7 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides as follows:

There shall be a complaint and an answer; a reply to a counterclaim

denominated as such; an answer to a cross-claim, if the answer contains a

cross-claim; a third-party complaint, if a person who was not an original

party is summoned under the provisions of Rule 14; and a third-party

answer, if a third-party complaint is served. No other pleading shall be

allowed, except that the court may order a reply to an answer or a thirdparty answer. 

Case 2:04-cv-01206-MCE -EFB Document 68 Filed 08/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a) (emphasis added). The court has not ordered plaintiff to reply to defendants’

answer and declines to make such an order. For that reason, the document filed by plaintiff on

December 19, 2005 will be disregarded.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s

December 19, 2005 objection to defendant’s answer shall be disregarded. 

DATED: July 31, 2006.

12

kitc1206.77e

Case 2:04-cv-01206-MCE -EFB Document 68 Filed 08/02/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 12.2****IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION****COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                       **YearEnded December 31,** **(In Thousands)** **2004**  **2003**  **2002**  **2001**  **2000**                      **Including Interest on Deposits**                                         Earnings:                    Earnings before income taxes $114,177  $118,402  $86,231  $74,200  $59,342 Fixed charges from below  92,225   99,099   97,795   121,083   93,539                 Earnings $206,402  $217,501  $184,026  $195,283  $152,881                                      Fixed charges:                    Interest expense $92,225  $99,099  $97,795  $121,083  $93,539                                      Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  2.24x  2.19x  1.88x  1.61x  1.63x                                     **Excluding Interest on Deposits**                                         Earnings:                    Earnings before income taxes $114,177  $118,402  $86,231  $74,200  $59,342 Fixed charges from below  47,738   56,734   43,434   47,743   40,719                 Earnings $161,915  $175,136  $129,665  $121,943  $100,061                                      Fixed charges:                    Interest expense, excludinginterest on deposits $47,738  $56,734  $43,434  $47,743  $40,719                                      Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  3.39x  3.09x  2.99x  2.55x  2.46x
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 10/26/2023 1

A Party’s Standing 

to Challenge Voter-Registration Procedures 

Florida Democratic Party v. Hood 

(Stephan P. Mickle, N.D. Fla. 4:04-cv-405) 

A political party filed a federal complaint challenging election officials’ not processing voter-registration applications on which applicants did not check a box stating that they were U.S. citizens even if 

they signed a statement that they were citizens. The district judge ordered a prompt response and then dismissed the case for lack of 

standing, because the party had not alleged actual denial of registration for one of its members. 

Subject: Registration procedures. Topics: Citizenship; 

registration procedures; National Voter Registration Act. 

The Florida Democratic Party filed a federal complaint against Florida’s secretary of state on October 7, 2004, alleging that election officials in Florida 

were not processing voter-registration applications on which the checkbox for 

U.S. citizen status was not checked “yes” even if the attestation of citizenship 

was signed.1 With its complaint, the party filed a motion for a preliminary injunction.2

Finding that time was of the essence, Judge Stephan P. Mickle ordered the 

secretary to respond by October 12.3 On October 11, the party moved for joinder of the U.S. Department of Justice as a party or participation as an amicus 

curiae by the department as an alternative.4

On October 14, Judge Mickle dismissed the case.5 “Plaintiff has simply 

failed to allege that any member or members of the Democratic Party could 

have sued in his or her own right. In fact, nowhere does Plaintiff’s complaint 

state that any members of the Democratic Party will be injured personally by 

the challenged state action.”6 Because the complaint did not allege that a Democrat was actually denied registration for failing to check the box, the party 

lacked standing to pursue the case.7

1. Complaint, Fla. Democratic Party v. Hood, No. 4:04-cv-405 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 7, 2004), 

D.E. 1; see Lucy Morgan & Joni James, New Suit Expands Pre-Election Battles, St. Petersburg 

Times, Oct. 8, 2004, at 5B. 

2. Preliminary-Injunction Motion, Fla. Democratic Party, No. 4:04-cv-405 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 

7, 2004), D.E. 3. 

3. Order, id. (Oct. 7, 2004), D.E. 5. 

Judge Mickle died on January 26, 2021. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of 

Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

4. Motion, Fla. Democratic Party, No. 4:04-cv-405 (N.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2004), D.E. 7. 

5. Opinion, id. (Oct. 14, 2004), D.E. 10. 

6. Id. at 3. 

7. Id. at 4.
No. 43993.

#### Protests 210243-G, etc., of American Shipping Co. et al. (New York),

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Memorandum

To: Four Corners Power Plant Permit Fite, NN 14-01 and T-0002-NN

From: Lisa Beckham

Date: July 28, 2014

Re: Summary of Phone Call with Dr. John Spar

On July 28, 2014, I received a phone call from Dr. John Spar with WildEarth Guardians. Dr. Spar was

asked several questions regarding the project associated with the proposed permit. Dr. Spar seemed to

be particularly concerned about acid deposition and I referred him to the Biological Assessment and the

concurrence from the Fish and Wildlife Service, available in the docket for this action.

Dr. Spar explained that he and his organization are still concerned about CO2 emissions from Units 4 and

5 and asked whether they should submit comments on this issue. I informed him that we are only

seeking comment on the narrow issue of the SCR Project at this time.
S?[rE of WeSnINGToN

sEcREmRr of sTArn

I, SAM REED, Secretary of State of the State of Washington and custodian of its seal,

hereby issue this

CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION

to

MORNING STAR PHOTOGRAPHY, LLC

A Washington Limited

filed for record in

Liability

this office

Company. An

on the date

applicatj-on was

indicated below

UBI Number: 602 LlB 189 Date: Januarv 3L, 2402

Gioenunder my hand nndthe Seal of the State

of Washington at Olympio the State Capital
EXHIBIT 21(a).  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                              
                              
                              
                                             State of
Name                                         Organization

Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company                Indiana
     Irwin Union Collateral, Inc.                 Indiana
     Irwin Union Realty Corporation               Indiana
     Irwin Union Insurance, Inc.                  Indiana

Irwin Mortgage Corporation                        Indiana
     Inland Mortgage Corporation                  Indiana

Irwin Union Investor Services, Inc.
Indiana
     Irwin Union Securities, Inc.                 Indiana
     Irwin Union Advisory Services, Inc.
Indiana

Irwin Home Equity Corporation                     Indiana
     IHE Funding Corp.                            Delaware

Irwin Union Leasing Corporation                   Indiana
     Affiliated Capital Corp.1                    Illinois

Irwin Union Credit Insurance Corporation
Arizona

White River Capital Corporation                   Indiana

IFC Capital Trust I                               Delaware


_______________________________
1 80%owned by Registrant
XXXPAGE 205XXX
EUROPEAN MICRO HOLDINGS, INC.


                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT

                                  EXHIBIT 15.01


We have  reviewed  the  accompanying  consolidated  condensed  balance  sheet of
European Micro  Holdings,  Inc. and  subsidiaries  as of March 31, 2000, and the
related consolidated  condensed statements of operations for the three-month and
nine-month periods then ended, and the related consolidated condensed statements
of  stockholders'  equity and cash flows for the  nine-month  period then ended.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute  of  Certified  Public  Accountants.  A review  of  interim  financial
information consists principally of applying analytical  procedures to financial
data and making  inquiries of persons  responsible  for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with  generally  accepted  auditing  standards,  the  objective  of which is the
expression of an opinion  regarding the financial  statements  taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material  modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements for them
to be in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.

We have  previously  audited,  in accordance  with generally  accepted  auditing
standards,  the consolidated balance sheet of European Micro Holdings,  Inc. and
subsidiaries  as of June 30, 1999,  and the related  consolidated  statements of
operations,  shareholders'  equity,  and cash flows for the year then ended (not
presented  herein);  and in our report dated  August 20,  1999,  we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.  In our opinion,
the information set forth in the  accompanying  consolidated  condensed  balance
sheet at June 30, 1999, is fairly stated, in all material respects,  in relation
to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

The accompanying  consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note
11 to the consolidated condensed financial statements,  the Company has suffered
losses from operations in the current quarter and is out of compliance with loan
covenants of certain of its debt  agreements.  In addition,  certain  other loan
agreements contain  contractual  provisions which allow the lender to accelerate
the maturity of such borrowings.  Such conditions  indicate that the Company may
be unable to continue as a going concern.  Management's plans in regard to these
matters are also  described  in Note 11. The  consolidated  condensed  financial
statements do not include any adjustments  that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.

/s/ KPMG

Nashville, TN
May 8, 2000
<PAGE>
         Exhibit 21.1
         ------------


                              IIC INDUSTRIES INC.
                              ------------------

                              List of Subsidiaries
                              --------------------



Israel Tractors and Equipment Co. Ltd. (Israel)
              Ambache  Engineering, Ltd. (Israel)

Investor Rt. (Hungary)
              Interag Rt. (Hungary)
              Agrimpex Rt. (Hungary)
              Agrimpex International Ltd. (UK)
              Agrimill Rt. (Hungary)
              Viktoria Rt. (Hungary)
              Zenit Kft. (Hungary)

Interag Rt. (Hungary)
              Interag Auto Kft.
              Kompakt Auto Kft.
              Ferencvarosi Autoszerviz Kft.
              Motor Pedo, Kft.
              Frigoland Kft.
              Royal Motor, Kft.
              Bunter Kft.
              H.H.H. Udvarhaz Kft.
              ATI Depot, Rt.
              Multisales, Kft.
              DP Invest, Kft.
              Agriterminal, Kft.

Balton C.P. Limited (England)
              Amiran Zambia Ltd. (Zambia)
              Dizengoff Ghana Ltd. (Ghana)
              Amiran Kenya Ltd. (Kenya)
              Tanzania Transcontinental Trading Co. Ltd. (Tanzania)
              Balton BV-DWA (Nigeria) Ltd.  (Nigeria)
              Balton (U) Ltd. Uganda (Uganda)
              Dizengoff (WA) Nigeria Limited (Nigeria)
              Balton SNES S.A. (Ivory Coast)
18.02
No. 90-414 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

1991 

THE STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Respondent, 

-vsBRIAN TRENT WELDELE, 

Defendant and Appellant. 

APPEAL FROM: District Court of the First Judicial District, 

In and for the County of Lewis & Clark, 

The Honorable Jeffrey Sherlock, Judge presiding. 

COUNSEL OF RECORD: 

For Appellant: 

Charles A. Graveley, Helena, Montana. 

For Respondent: 

Hon. Marc Racicot, Attorney General, State of 

Montana, Helena, Montana; Michael J. Rieley, 

Assistant City Attorney, City of East Helena, Luxan 

& Murfitt, Helena, Montana. 

Submitted: March 28, 1991 

Decided : May 7, 1991 

Filed: 

STA-rE GF ii~~ei+~i~ii~ 
Chief Justice J. A. Turnage delivered the Opinion of the Court. 

Brian Trent Weldele appeals an order and a judgment of the 

First Judicial District, Lewis and Clark County, which denied his 

motion to dismiss and found him guilty of driving while under the 

influence of alcohol (third offense), a misdemeanor. The District 

Court sentenced Weldele to the following: one year imprisonment 

with thirty days suspended, a $1,000.00 fine, a $10.00 mandatory 

surcharge fee, court costs, suspended his driver's license, and 

ordered him to attend the ACT program through Boyd Andrew Care 

Center. We affirm. 

The sole issue presented on appeal is a factual dispute: 

following his arrest for driving under the influence of alcohol, 

did Weldele request a blood test during the booking process, and 

did the arresting police officer deny him this right? A videotape 

of the Weldelels booking process, although poor in quality, is 

consistent with the arresting police officer's testimony that 

although Weldele once inquired about a blood test, he never at any 

time requested that a blood test be performed. We therefore agree 

with the District Court and hold that, based upon the videotape and 

the testimony of the arresting police officer, Weldele did not 

request a blood test during the booking process and accordingly, 

was not denied his right to a blood test. 

Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(c), Montana Supreme Court 

Operating Rules, this decision shall not be cited as precedent and 
shall be published by its filing as a public document with the 

Clerk of this Court and by a report of its result to West 

Publishing Company. 

Let remittitur issue forthwith. 

We concur: 
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. 90-414 

THE STATE OF MONTANA, 1 

Plaintiff and Respondent, 

1 -- - -- 1 - ;- --- -- 

- v. 

1 

BRIAN TRENT WELDELE, 1 

1 

Defendant and Appellant. 1 

On May 7, 1991, the Opinion of this Court was issued in the 

above-entitled appeal. It appearing that there is an error in said 

Opinion, 

IT IS ORDERED that the following language found at page 2 of 

the Opinion of this Court dated May 7, 1991, . . . one year 

imprisonment with thirty days suspended, . . .I8 be amended to read, 

It. . . one year imprisonment with all but thirty days suspended, 

The Clerk is directed to mail a true copy of this order to 

coun .sel of 

DATED 

record for the respective parties. 

this ) day of May, 1991.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,797
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,023
<INVENTORY>                                     32,603
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,500
<PP&E>                                          34,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           52,171
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,586
<OTHER-SE>                                      86,847
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,838
<SALES>                                        203,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,710
<CGS>                                          155,059
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                43,543
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,776
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,270
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,207
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,629
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,629
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.64
        


</TABLE>
Top of page

Skip to main content

Library of Congress

              - Discover
              - Services
              - Visit
              - Education
              - Connect
              - Shop *external link*
              - Donate
              - About
              - Ask a Librarian
              - Help
              - Contact
              - Search Online Catalog
              - Copyright.gov
              - Congress.gov

Library of Congress
Digital Collections
Country Studies