1

2

3

4

5

6

7 

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Sanford v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co., et al. 

TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER Case No. 04-1033 FCD PAN 

LYNN HUBBARD, III SBN 69773 

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD, IV, SBN 212970 

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD 

12 Williamsburg Lane 

Chico, CA 95926 

Phone: (530) 895-3252 

Fax: (530) 894-8244 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ANN HOFFMANN LARSON, SBN 176461 

GARY R. JOHNSON, SBN 42894 

MCNAMARA DODGE NEY BEATTY SLATTERY & PFALZER 

1211 Newell Avenue, P.O. Box 5288 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

Phone: (925) 939-5330 

Fax: (925) 939-0203 

Attorneys For Defendant Kelly-Moore Paint Company, Inc.

ADRIAN RANDOLPH, SBN 133577 

JENNY J. RIM, SBN 231584 

RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP 

1030 “G” Street 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Phone: (916) 443-4443 

Fax: (916) 443-2124 

Attorneys For Defendant 

Alexander and Shirley Fahn Revocable Trust 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES SANFORD, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

KELLY-MOORE PAINT COMPANY, 

INC.; ALEXANDER FAHN and 

SHIRLEY FAHN TRUSTEES OF THE 

ALEXANDER and SHIRLEY FAHN 

REVOCABLE TRUST; and DOES 1 

through 20, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV.S-04-1033 FCD PAN 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

MODIFYING THE SCHEDULING 

ORDER REGULATING DISCOVERY 

Case 2:04-cv-01033-FCD-CMK Document 36 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7 

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

2 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Sanford v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co., et al. 

TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER Case No. 04-1033 FCD PAN

WHEREAS, on September 13, 2004, the parties were served with a Scheduling 

Order ("Scheduling Order") for this action; 

WHEREAS, the Scheduling Order provided that all discovery shall be completed 

by all parties on or before August 15, 2005; 

WHEREAS, defense counsel informed plaintiff’s counsel that defendant’s expert 

witness would not be available for deposition until the beginning of September 2005, both parties 

seek to extend the date for the close of discovery as to defendants’ expert only, in order for the 

deposition to occur; 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the parties hereto 

that the Scheduling Order shall be amended to provide as follows: 

(1) Defendants’ expert deposition will be conducted on or before September 30, 

2005. 

DATED: August 15, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III 

By:/s/ LYNN HUBBARD, III_____________ 

Lynn Hubbard, III 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

DATED: August 15, 2005 MCNAMARA DODGE NEY BEATTY SLATTERY & 

PFALZER 

By:Signature on file___________________

Gary R. Johnson 

Attorneys for Defendant Kelly-Moore Paint 

Company, Inc. 

DATED: August 15, 2005 RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT 

By:Signature on file___________________ 

Jenny J. Rim 

Attorneys for Defendant Alexander Fahn and 

Shirley Fahn, Trustees of the Alexander and 

Shirley Fahn Revocable Trust 

Case 2:04-cv-01033-FCD-CMK Document 36 Filed 08/17/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7 

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

3 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Sanford v. Kelly-Moore Paint Co., et al. 

TO AMEND THE SCHEDULING ORDER Case No. 04-1033 FCD PAN

ORDER

IT HAVING BEEN STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Scheduling Order shall be amended to provide as follows: 

(1) Defendants’ expert deposition will be conducted on or before September 30, 

2005. 

DATED: August 16, 2005 /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:04-cv-01033-FCD-CMK Document 36 Filed 08/17/05 Page 3 of 3