alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 02-CV-4421

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of 2005, upon consideration of

Plaintiff’s Answer Opposing Premature Motion to Preclude Recovery of Attorney Fees and

supporting Memorandum of Law, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Preclude

Counsel Fees is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED, and defendants are ordered to pay plaintiff’s

counsel $600 in reasonable fees in responding to the Motion.

BY THE COURT,

 

Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 54-2 Filed 09/13/2005 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4329 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4329

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 103 Benedette Street in Rayville, Louisiana, as the ``Luke Letlow 
                        Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2024

  Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 103 Benedette Street in Rayville, Louisiana, as the ``Luke Letlow 
                        Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LUKE LETLOW POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 103 Benedette Street in Rayville, Louisiana, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Luke Letlow Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Luke 
Letlow Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 41 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                      To reauthorize the READ Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``READ Act Reauthorization Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 4(a) of the Reinforcing Education Accountability in 
Development Act (division A of Public Law 115-56; 22 U.S.C. 2151c note) 
is amended by striking ``during the following five fiscal years'' and 
inserting ``during the following ten fiscal years''.

            Passed the Senate November 6, 2023.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 41

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                      To reauthorize the READ Act.
```
165 AI Mooney Road North



### r-' Kerrville. Texas 78028

..--..._ THIS BULLETIN IS FAA APPROVED FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN SERVICE .BULLETIN M20-313A · Date: February 29;**~012** 

# MOONEYAVIATION COMPANY KERRVILLE, 

### TEXAS 78028- FAX to 830-257-4635 

# AD za12-os-o9 N SERVICE (BULLETIN) (INSTRUCTION) NO. 

# M2.0-31.$4 HAS BEEN COMPUED SERIAL NUMBER 

# 2 5 0 Q_ 

## r WITH ON AIRCRAFT MODEL 

# NJ .3. 0 

### ETach. Time: N-Number 

## C.- 

# G WC E. (Reg. No.) Dateof 

# 2 2.S Compliance: 0 

### 12 - o

### ~ -

## ~~plied 

# Je y

# rv z e)'\

### +Yl 

# e y 

## M 2.44 707 Inspection Report: 

# Ajc. fo u. t\ 

## d

Fonn 07oG001 

## F A A

'. 

### '
. . . .. . . f**~** 

### MOONEYAVIATION COMPANY ATT'N: TECHNICAL SUPPORT 165 AI Mooney Road, North Kenville; Texas 78028

SEND 

### TO: Mooney Aviation Company 165

### AI·Moonev Road 

### North Kerrville, TX 78028 FiQure SB M20-313-2 - Compliance CUrd PLACE STAMP HERE 

## . .·:.



# . .........



### ·page4of4 MOONEY 

### AVIATION COMPANY. 

### INC. 165AIMooneyRoadNotth, Kerrville,

### T~**7~tei:B»8fi~** www.niooney.com '.1 • ,.(·.
No. 64860.

#### D. Stanley Corcoran, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/19748, 59/20335, and 59/7139 (New York).

*366Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vases in mineral colors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62694, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

No. 10-0156

IN RE  BOMBARDIER INC., BOMBARDIER AEROSPACE CORPORATION AND LEARJET INC.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

**ORDERED:**

1.Relators’ motion for immediate temporary relief, filed March 5, 2010, is granted.  All trial court proceedings in Cause No. DC-08-02249, styled *Sky Capital Group, Ltd., d/b/a G5000, Ltd. v. Bombardier, Inc., Bombardier, Inc., d/b/a Bombardier Aerospace Corporation, Bombardier Aerospace Corporation and Learjet, Inc.*, in the 44th District Court of Dallas County, Texas are stayed pending further order of this Court.

2.The real party in interest is requested to respond to relators’ petition for writ of mandamus on or before 3:00 p.m., March 29, 2010.

3.The petition for writ of mandamus remains pending before this Court.

Done at the City of Austin, this March 12, 2010.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

Supreme Court of Texas

By Claudia Jenks, Chief Deputy Clerk
Williams, Renee (OST) t^cttj - 'QOT- 0 6>T- 2.00^- /^5 ^ 3 

From: cyril hetherington [cyhmly@hotmail.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:19 PM 

To: Williams, Renee (OST) 

Subject: Manley EAS 

Our current air carrier ,Warbelow has provided good service and acceptable for renewal. 

Cy hetherington and Tonn hetherington ,Residents in Manley Hot Springs. Our present 

airport serves us well but needs a little ADOT maintenance.Thank you. 

The New Busy is not the old busy. Search, chat and e-nnail from your inbox. Get started. 

-a 

C 3
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3945 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6936

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TROY DONYEL STANSBURY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR89-434-S)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 17, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy Donyel Stansbury, Appellant Pro Se. Harvey Ellis Eisenberg,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his "Motion to Abolish Supervised Release" as frivolous. Our review of the

record discloses that Appellant's claims are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United

States v. Stansbury, No. CR-89-434-S (D. Md. June 30, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Before the Third Division,

June 21, 1956

No. 60065.

#### Artco Industrial Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 274812-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 64120.

protests 58/10093, 58/10132, and 329886-K (Seattle).

#### Close and Stewart *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements listed below of Irwin Financial Corporation of our report dated
February 19, 2004 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this
Form 10-K. /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Chicago, Illinois
March 5, 2004 Registration Statements:
No. 33-8506 on Form S-8 effective September 25, 1986
No. 33-25931 on Form S-8 effective November 28, 1988
No. 33-32783 on Form S-8 effective January 11, 1990
No. 2-72249 on Form S-3 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment
No. 3 to Form S-16 effective January 17, 1990
No. 33-32783 on Form S-8 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment
No. 1 effective April 9, 1990
No. 33-47680 on Form S-8 effective May 5, 1992
No. 2-72249 on Form S-3 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment
No. 4 to Form S-16 effective April 7, 1994
No. 33-62671 on Form S-8 effective September 15, 1995
No. 33-62669 on Form S-8 effective September 15, 1995
No. 333-26197 on Form S-8 effective April 30, 1997
No. 333-80777 on Form S-8 effective June 16, 1999
No. 333-41740 on Form S-8 effective July 19, 2000
No. 333-60748 on Form S-8 effective May 11, 2001
No. 333-69156 on Form S-8 effective September 7, 2001
No. 67818.

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/33400, 59/33424, and 60/29535 (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LEONARDO SOCCOLICH and )

MILA PAPIC-SOCCOLICH, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-504

)

WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND )

SOCIETY, FSB, d/b/a CHRISTIANA )

TRUST, not in its individual capacity )

but solely as Trustee for Brougham )

Fund I Trust, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed July 12, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Lon Arend, Judge.

Leonardo Soccolich and Mila PapicSoccolich, pro se.

Shannon T. Sinai and Brandon S. Vesely 

of Albertelli Law, Tampa, for Appellee 

Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

KHOUZAM, C.J., and LUCAS and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
Before the Second Division,

June 24, 1940

No. 44007.

#### Protests 988414-G, etc., of Wm. Filenes Sons Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Total users

80.0K

-10.5% from previous 31 days

Sessions

107.4K

-7.9% from previous 31 days

30-day active users

156.2K

-7.7% from previous 31 days

Mar 1, 2024 - Mar 31, 2024 ▼

FLETC All Website Data - ▼

Views Engagement rate

1. 264,820 58.08%

▼

1 - 1 / 1

< >

Pageviews and Engagement

new returning

33.6%

66.4%

New vs. Returned Visitors

google

(direct)

bing

dhs.gov

fletcprod.modolabs.n

usajobs.gov

sass.fletc.dhs.g

yahoo

duckduckgo

others

6.3%

17.5%

63.5%

Visits by Source

Average session duration Engaged sessions

1. 00:02:49 62,404

▼

1 - 1 / 1

< >

Session Details

FLETC.gov Web Performance Metrics

Page title Views

1. Training Catalog | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

1,180

2. Frontpage | Federal Law Enforcement Training

Centers

1,049

3. Glynco, Georgia | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

553

4. Training | Federal Law Enforcement Training

Centers

368

5. Programs | Federal Law Enforcement Training

Centers

222

6. Careers and Internships | Federal Law

Enforcement Training Centers

213

7. Careers | Federal Law Enforcement Training

Centers

198

8. Physical Efficiency Battery (PEB) | Federal 

Enforcement Training Centers

190

9. Glynco Campus Life | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

176

10. Basic Programs | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

174

▼

1 - 100 / 391 < >

Top Overall Pages

Active users 30-day active users

1... 78,613 156,243

▼

1 - 1 / 1

< >

Active Users
Views

2PM

11AM

1PM

4PM

10AM

5PM

6PM

12AM

12PM

7PM

0

10

20

30

26

21

17

16

15

14

13

12 12 12

Hour

Pageviews by Hour

Device category Sessions

1. desktop 54,198

2. mobile 49,565

3. tablet 988

4. smart tv 7

▼

1 - 4 / 4

< >

Sessions by Device Category

Session source / medium Sessions

1. google / organic 66,038

2. bing / organic 7,299

3. dhs.gov / referral 2,293

4. usajobs.gov / referral 1,314

5. sass.fletc.dhs.gov / referral 1,1

6. fletc-prod.modolabs.net / ref... 1,2

7. yahoo / organic 703

8. duckduckgo / organic 736

9. usa.gov / referral 222

10. ncis.navy.mil / referral 297

1 - 100 / 367

<

>

Sessions and Pageviews by Source / Medium

FLETC.gov Web Performance Metrics
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4325 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program relating 

to lifespan respite care, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2024 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the 

program relating to lifespan respite care, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lifespan Respite Care 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF LIFESPAN RESPITE CARE 

7 PROGRAM. 

8 (a) DEFINITION OF FAMILY CAREGIVER.—Section 

9 2901(5) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4325 IS

1 300ii(5)) is amended by striking ‘‘unpaid adult’’ and in2 serting ‘‘unpaid individual’’. 

3 (b) FUNDING.—Section 2905 of the Public Health 

4 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300ii–4) is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘fiscal years 2020 through fiscal year 2024’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘fiscal years 2025 through 2029’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The following certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 and in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238. This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes
  of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall it be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the
  date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

In connection with the Annual Report of J. W. Mays, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending July 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), we, Lloyd J.
  Shulman and Mark S. Greenblatt, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that to our knowledge:

|   
|---
|(1)
|   
|(2)

October 11, 2007

|/s/ LLOYDS.
    SHULMAN  
|-------------------------
|Lloyd J. Shulman         
|Chief Executive Officer  
|                         
|/s/ MARKS.
    GREENBLATT
|Mark S. Greenblatt       
|Chief Financial Officer  









A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to J.W. Mays, Inc. and will be retained by J. W. Mays, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
  upon request.



---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Jonathan Conrad Fuller,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1276 FCD PAN P 

vs. Order

Altchek, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a prisoner prosecuting this action without

counsel. Confronted by defendants’ motion to dismiss, plaintiff

seeks leave to file a third-amended complaint. Defendants

oppose.

A party may amend the party’s pleading once as a matter of

right before the filing of a responsive pleading; otherwise a

party may amend only by consent or with leave of court, which

must be freely given. Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). By statute, a

court must review a prisoner’s complaint and dismiss all or part

Case 2:04-cv-01276-FCD-EFB Document 31 Filed 01/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

of it if the complaint does not state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2); 1915A. 

The question is whether plaintiff may proceed on the August

2, 2005, amended complaint without leave of court, or whether his

right to amend once as of right was exhausted when he first

amended. Since the order requiring amendment made pursuant to

section 1915A is “like” one made pursuant to a motion to dismiss

pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), and a such a motion is not a pleading,

I conclude plaintiff retained the right conferred by Rule 15. 

See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2000) (language of

section 1915(e)(2) parallels language of 12(b)(6) and fifty

years’ precedent instructs court ordinarily should grant leave to

amend when dismissing pursuant to 12(b)(6)); Rule 7(a) (defining

pleadings and not including motions).

Since defendants have not filed and served a responsive

pleading, defendants’ July 29, 2005, motion to dismiss is denied

upon the ground it is moot. Defendants have 30 days to respond

to the August 2, 2005, amended complaint. 

So ordered.

Dated: January 24, 2006. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01276-FCD-EFB Document 31 Filed 01/24/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 60820.

#### Cosmos Shipping Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 280248-K and 280249-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

At the trial, the Government conceded that there was an error in liquidation and that the merchandise in question was properly dutiable, as claimed. The claim of the plaintiff was, therefore, sustained.
Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees; Order

Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc., Case No. 2:04-cv-01339-MCE-AC

- 1 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Byron Chapman, 

Plaintiff,

vs.

Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc., 

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. 2:04-cv-01339-MCE-AC

Stipulation to Continue Hearing on 

Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ 

Fees; Order Thereon

Scottlynn J Hubbard, IV, SBN 212970

Disabled Advocacy Group, APLC

12 Williamsburg Lane

Chico, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Facsimile: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Byron Chapman

Eden Anderson, SBN 233464

Seyfarth Shaw, LLP

560 Mission Street, 31st Floor

San Francisco, California 94105

Telephone: (415) 397-2823

Facsimile: (415) 397-8549

Attorney for Defendant 

Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc.

Case 2:04-cv-01339-MCE-AC Document 240 Filed 08/03/16 Page 1 of 2
Stipulation to Continue Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees; Order

Chapman v. Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc., Case No. 2:04-cv-01339-MCE-AC

- 2 -

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES: The parties to this action, 

Plaintiff Byron Chapman and Defendant Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc., hereby

request the hearing for Plaintiff’s motion for attorneys’ fees, costs and litigation 

expenses be continued by two (2) weeks, to August 25, 2016. 

Dated: July 29, 2016 DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC

/s/ Scottlynn J Hubbard IV, Esq.

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, ESQ.

Attorney for Plaintiff

Robert Dodson

Dated: July 29, 2016 SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP

/s/ Eden Anderson, Esq.

EDEN ANDERSON, ESQ.

Attorney for Defendant 

Pier 1 Imports (U.S.), Inc.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the hearing on Plaintiff’s motion for 

attorneys’ fees, costs and litigation expenses is hereby continued to August 

25, 2016 at 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 3, 2016

Case 2:04-cv-01339-MCE-AC Document 240 Filed 08/03/16 Page 2 of 2
**Publications | PCSD HomeProceedings of the Workshop**
No. 64132.

protests 118037-K, etc. (Tampa and San Francisco).

#### Parrott & Co. and R. C. Williams & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 10.6



LETTER DATED JULY 23, 2003 ACKNOWLEDGING TERMINATION OF

PREVIOUS SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN

KREISLER MANUFACTURING CORPORATION

AND WALLACE KELLY (JULY 11, 2001) AND

NEW
SUPPLEMENTAL COMPENSATION AGREEMENT



July 23,
2003



Dear Wally,



This letter confirms our mutual understanding that the original agreement
dated July 11, 2001 is null and void.



The new agreement as
outlined below replaces the original supplemental agreement.



Wallace N. Kelly will receive $110,000.00 additional compensation on February 15, 2004 as a continuation bonus for his additional services including transitioning a new COO.



In consideration of this agreement Wallace N. Kelly will remain employed until February 1, 2004 unless the Company decides
to terminate his employment at an earlier date. Compensation and living expenses will continue at the current rate until termination.



If you are in agreement with the above terms and conditions please acknowledge by signing below.



Thank you.



Sincerely,



|By:              |  | /s/ Edward L. Stern               
|---------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|                 |  | Kreisler Manufacturing Corporation
|                 |  | CEO and President                 
|                 | 
|Acknowledgement: |  | /s/ Wallace N. Kelly              
|                 |  | On July 30, 2003
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We haveissued our reports dated March 30, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financial statementsand schedules and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting included in the Annual Report of Xanser Corporation on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in theRegistration Statements of Xanser Corporation on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-101996, 333-87446, 333-83970, 333-83968,333-68558, 333-34496, 333-60195, 333-22109, 333-14071, 333-14069, 333-14067, 333-08727, 333-08725,333-08723, 33-58981, 33-54027 and 33-41295)./s/ Grant Thornton LLPDallas, Texas