alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SILVIO PASOVIO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1385 GEB DAD P

vs.

WARDEN STRATON, et al., ORDER FOR PAYMENT

Defendants. OF INMATE FILING FEE

 /

To: The Director of the California Department of Corrections, 1515 S Street, Sacramento,

California 95814:

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, is obligated to

pay the statutory filing fee of $150.00 for this action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff will

be obligated to make monthly payments in the amount of twenty percent of the preceding

month’s income credited to plaintiff’s prison trust account. The California Department of

Corrections is required to send to the Clerk of the Court payments from plaintiff’s prison trust

account each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00, until the statutory filing fee is paid

in full. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01385-GEB-DAD Document 5 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

 In accordance with the above and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The Director of the California Department of Corrections or a designee shall

collect monthly payments from plaintiff’s prison trust account in an amount equal to twenty per

cent (20%) of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s prison trust account and shall

forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), until a total of $150.00 has been collected

and forwarded to the Clerk of the Court. The payments shall be clearly identified by the name

and number assigned to this action. 

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of

plaintiff’s signed in forma pauperis application on Director, California Department of

Corrections, 1515 S Street, Sacramento, California 95814.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial

Department of the court.

DATED: July 25, 2005.

DAD:13

paso1385.cdca

Case 2:04-cv-01385-GEB-DAD Document 5 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 

 

JOSE A. LOPEZ,

Plaintiff(s),

vs. CIV-S-04-1447-MCE/GGH

LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE, et al.,

Defendant(s).

______________________________________/

 Plaintiff filed a discovery motion on April 21, 2005 set for hearing May 12, 2005

@ 10:00 a.m.. Notwithstanding the three days specified by E.D. Cal. L.R. 37-251 the joint

statement shall be filed in no later than five court days before the scheduled hearing.

Notwithstanding E.D. Cal. L.R. 5-133(f), if the joint statement is more than 25 pages, or the

attachments are longer than 50 pages, the copy shall be hand delivered or sent by overnight mail

to chambers on the day of filing. The filing deadline, accordingly, will be May 5, 2005.

The dispute may be organized by category, with specific discovery items attached,

if appropriate, as an exhibit. For each disputed category or individual item, include: (1) the

specific disputed discovery category or item; (2) the response; (3) the moving party’s position;

and (4) the opposition. E.D.Cal. L.R. 37-251(c)(3). Do not file separate briefing. Id.

Privilege objections must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5). Except in

extraordinary circumstances, the party claiming privilege may not submit a post-hearing privilege

log. The failure properly to support a privilege objection with a privilege log may be deemed to

waive it. 

The moving party is responsible for filing the joint statement. The opposing party

nevertheless must timely draft and submit its portion. Failure of either party to use best efforts to

ensure timely filing will be cause for sanctions. 

Dated: 4/25/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 ___________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

U.S. Magistrate Judge

lopez1447.251

Case 2:04-cv-01447-MCE -GGH Document 27 Filed 04/25/05 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection
with the Yearly Report of Advantage Capital Development Corp. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey Sternberg, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. By:
    /s/   Jeffrey SternbergJeffrey Sternberg
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer Dated: July 13, 2005
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

Terrence Brownlee,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. S-04-1330 DFL PAN P

vs. Order on Request for Counsel

J. Burleson, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in a civil rights action. Plaintiff moved for

appointment of counsel December 23, 2005, upon the ground the

case is complex and he suffers serious, chronic pain. 

In proceedings that do not threaten a litigant with loss of

physical liberty, there presumptively is no right to appointed

counsel. Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18,

26-27 (1981). Section 1915(e)(1) of Title 28 confers discretion

upon the court to request counsel represent an indigent civil

Case 2:04-cv-01330-DFL-EFB Document 27 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

litigant. Mallard v. District Court, 490 U.S. 296 (1989).

In deciding whether to appoint counsel the court exercises

discretion governed by a number of factors, including the

likelihood of success on the merits and the applicant’s ability

to present his claims in light of their complexity. Weygandt v.

Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983); see also, LaMere v.

Risley, 827 F.2d 622, 626 (9th Cir. 1987). Ordinarily the

presumption of regularity in the state’s procedures for confining

prisoners suggests a lack of likely success and counsels against

appointment of counsel. See Maclin v. Freake, 650 F.2d 885, 887

(7th Cir. 1981). As a general rule, the court will not appoint

counsel unless the applicant shows his claim has merit in fact

and law. Id. Even if the applicant overcomes this hurdle, the

court will not appoint counsel if the law is settled and the

material facts are within the plaintiff’s possession, viz., they

do not require investigation outside the prison walls. Id. at

887-88. 

Here, plaintiff alleges his constitutional rights were

violated when defendants provided inadequate medical care. The

law governing this issue is settled and investigation outside the

prison walls is unnecessary to discover material facts. There

is, on the record before the court, no reason to believe

appointment of counsel would be of significant benefit. 

///

/// 

///

Case 2:04-cv-01330-DFL-EFB Document 27 Filed 01/18/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Plaintiff’s December 23, 2005, motion for the appointment of

counsel therefore is denied.

So ordered.

Dated: January 17, 2006. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01330-DFL-EFB Document 27 Filed 01/18/06 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN FRANCIS HILDEBRAND,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0607 FCD GGH P

vs.

VERNIE SPEIRS, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is proceeding through counsel with this application for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 17, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-00607-FCD-GGH Document 18 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 17, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s April 28, 2004, motion to dismiss is denied; and

3. Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.

DATED:July 27, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00607-FCD-GGH Document 18 Filed 07/27/05 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Mentalhealth [electronic resource]: a report of the Surgeon General.**
 
Full Report
Parts:
Forward/Preface
Acknowledgements
Chapter 1
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Chapter 5
Chapter 6
Chapter 7
Chapter 8
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.402:M 52/2
Item Number:0497-D-07 (online)
CGP systemNumber:
 
May 29, 2018
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MERRICK JOSE MOORE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0871 MCE EFB P

vs.

J. SLOSS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 / AD TESTIFICANDUM

J. Gillroy, inmate # D-98256, a necessary and material witness in proceedings in

this case on September 7, 2010, is confined in California State Prison, Sacramento, California, in

the custody of the Warden; in order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ

of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate in

Court, 14th Floor, Courtroom 7, United States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California

on September 7, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to testify in United States District

Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of court proceedings or

as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution; 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this

inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order and

writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum on the Out-To-Court Desk.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden James Walker, California State Prison, Sacramento, Prison Road, P.O. Box

290002, Represa, California 95671-0002:

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before the

United States District Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of

the proceedings or as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above

institution.

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody

of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

DATED: August 3, 2010.

Case 2:04-cv-00871-MCE -EFB Document 151 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

:

v. : CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 05-467-1

:

JAMES CARSTARPHEN :

 

ORDER

This 14th day of January, 2022, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motionsto Correct 

Sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255, ECF Nos. 119 and 122, are DENIED for the reasons set forth in 

the accompanying memorandum. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

 /s/ Gerald Austin McHugh

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00467-GAM Document 140 Filed 01/14/22 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT
32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp.(the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's
position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more
fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
November 9, 2009





BY:/s/ Thomas J.
Stirnweis


(Signature)


THOMAS J.
STIRNWEIS


Vice
President, Treasurer and


Chief
Financial Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Analytics

FLETC All Website Data

All Web Site Data

Go to report 

FLETC.gov Web Performance Metrics Mar 1, 2020 - Mar 31, 2020

Total Visits

98,969

% of Total: 100.00% (98,969)

Avg. Visit Duration

00:02:08

Avg for View: 00:02:08 (0.00%)

Pageviews

300,326

% of Total: 100.00% (300,326)

Unique Visitors

71,587

% of Total: 100.00% (71,587)

Avg. Pages / Visit

3.03

Avg for View: 3.03 (0.00%)

Avg. Time on Page

00:01:03

Avg for View: 00:01:03 (0.00%)

Bounce Rate

48.69%

Avg for View: 48.69% (0.00%)

Top Pages

Page Title Pageviews

Bounce

Rate

Search the Training Catalog | FLET

C

51,680 33.65%

Welcome to FLETC | FLETC 42,037 32.61%

FLETC monitoring of Novel Corona

virus (COVID-19) | FLETC

17,287 61.81%

Glynco, Georgia | FLETC 13,024 39.23%

Locations | FLETC 7,076 49.12%

Resources | FLETC 5,127 46.53%

News & Events | FLETC 4,806 38.75%

FedBizOpps | FLETC 4,557 48.62%

Basic Programs | FLETC 4,453 35.96%

Careers and Internships | FLETC 4,332 41.06%

Visits by Social Network

Social Network Sessions

Facebook 1,017

Twitter 322

LinkedIn 33

reddit 21

Instagram 19

Quora 7

YouTube 7

Blogger 3

Hacker News 1

Instagram Stories 1

Visits by Source

New vs. Returned Visitors

google (direct) bing

search.usa.gov

fletc-prod.modolabs.net

Other

20.9% 58.9%

New Visitor Returning Visitor

20.1%

79.9%

© 2020 Google

All Users

100.00% Sessions
Analytics

FLETC All Website Data

All Web Site Data

Go to report 

FLETC.gov Search Performance Metrics Mar 1, 2020 - Mar 31, 2020

Visits to FLETC.gov

98,969

% of Total: 100.00% (98,969)

Total Internal Searches

0

% of Total: 0.00% (0)

Total External Searches (Google)

64,256

% of Total: 64.93% (98,969)

Top Internal Searches by Search Term

Search Term Total Unique Searches Organic Searches

There is no data for this view.

Top External Searches (Google - as reported)

Page Title Sessions

Welcome to FLETC | FLETC 12,911

FLETC monitoring of Novel Coronavirus

(COVID-19) | FLETC

4,109

FedBizOpps | FLETC 3,860

Glynco, Georgia | FLETC 2,557

Search the Training Catalog | FLETC 2,211

Execution of a Search Warrant (I) (MP

3) | FLETC

1,174

National Terrorism Advisory System | F

LETC

1,054

PEB Scores for Age and Gender | FLET

C

1,033

Customs and Border Protection, Officer

Basic Training | FLETC

951

Federal Conspiracy Law (Mp3) | FLETC 931

New vs. Returned Visitors

Avg. Visits per Visitor

New Visitor Returning Visitor

20.1%

79.9%

1 2 Other

21.4%

12.8%

65.8%

© 2020 Google

All Users

100.00% Sessions
# Qlante 

# TIT6-ra-n­ 'l,waHili.

March 19,2010

The Honorable Ray LaHood Dnited States pepartmellt**ofT!at}.~portation** 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Secretary LaHood: OnbehalfofPlante & Moran, PLLC, I am writing to express our strong support for the application ofDelta Air Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda.

, , Approval ofDelta's new service would be a major benefit for ourregion, where many' corporations have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are almost 250 Japanese companies located in Indiana and hundreds more whose business activities rely on access to Japan and its market. The growth ofourbusiness ties with Japan has created demand for increased capacityto Tokyo. Indiana corporate representatives look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda airport. Indianapolis does not offer international service to Asia, and many ofourbusiness travelers use Detroit as their hub when flying to Japan. Detroit is a proven and successful gatewayto Asia and is an airport that can supporttrans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the commitment Deltamade to DTWto make it the airline's gatewayto Asia.**Th~addition** ofHaneda as a destination is a natural fit that would clearly benefit our region. Thank you for consideration ofthis request. ';**~ ~i~~j**  i·,. ' / ' , • '.' ,.

, ,; -} Sincerely, 

# L', '" ::';"'/ ,,(7,," ; " '.,

### ~rt::J)/L--f?"/ George 

### H. Cumpata Plante & Moran, PLLC



# .. illinois Chicago' Elgin Michigan Ann Arbor' Auburn Hills' Detroit • East lansing 

## Praxity';
MEM:ER .,' Flint • Grand Rapids • Kalamazoo • Macomb' St. Joseph' Southfield • Traverse City GLO' AI. ALUANCE Of INOEPENOEtlT fiRMS Ohio Cleveland' Columbus' ToledO China Shanghai Mexico Monterrey plantemoran.com
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned officer of Genesis HealthCare Corporation (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 (the Report) that: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|               |   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: May 30, 2006 |   |   | /s/ James V. McKeon                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|               |   |   |  

 

 

James V. McKeonChief Financial Officer

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of National Drug Control Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of National Drug Control Policy.

The Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) proposes the collection of information concerning arrestee drug use. ONDCP hereby invites interested persons to submit comments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) regarding any aspect of this proposed effort. 

*Type of Information Collection:*                     New collection.                 

*Title:*                     Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM II) Program Questionnaire.                 

*Use:*                     The information will support statistical trend analysis.                 

*Frequency:*                     Ten sites will each conduct two cycles of surveys from 250 arrestees per cycle.                 

*Annual Number of Respondents:*                     5000.                 

*Total Annual Responses:*                     5000.                 

*Average Burden per Response:*                     20 minutes.                 

*Total Annual Hours:*                     1667.                 

Send comments to John Kraemer, OMB Desk Officer for ONDCP, New Executive Office Building, Room 10235, Washington, DC 20503. Comments must be received within 30 days. Request additional information by facsimile transmission to (202) 395-5598, attention: Robert Cohen, ONDCP, Office of Planning and Budget. 

Dated: January 9, 2007. 

Daniel R. Petersen, 

Assistant General Counsel.

 [FR Doc. E7-342 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3180-02-P