The New Zealand

Climate Science Coalition

Hon Secretary, Terry Dunleavy MBE, 14A Bayview Road, Hauraki, North Shore City 0622

Phone (09) 486 3859 - Mobile 0274 836688 - Email terry.dunleavy@nzclimatescience.org.nz

25 November 2009

Are we feeling warmer yet?

(A paper collated by Richard Treadgold, of the Climate Conversation Group, from a combined research 

project undertaken by members of the Climate Conversation Group and the New Zealand Climate Science 

Coalition)

There have been strident claims that New Zealand is warming. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), among other organisations and 

scientists, allege that, along with the rest of the world, we have been heating up 

for over 100 years.

But now, a simple check of publicly-available information proves these claims 

wrong. In fact, New Zealand’s temperature has been remarkably stable for a 

century and a half. So what’s going on?

New Zealand's National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research (NIWA) is 

responsible for New Zealand's National Climate Database. This database, 

available online, holds all New Zealand's climate data, including temperature 

readings, since the 1850s. Anybody can go and get the data for free. That’s what 

we did, and we made our own graph.

The official version

Before we see that, let’s look at the official temperature record. This is NIWA’s 

graph of temperatures covering the last 156 years:
From NIWA’s web site — Figure 7: Mean annual temperature over New Zealand, from 1853 to 2008 inclusive, based on between 2 (from 

1853) and 7 (from 1908) long-term station records. The blue and red bars show annual differences from the 1971 – 2000 average, the solid 

black line is a smoothed time series, and the dotted [straight] line is the linear trend over 1909 to 2008 (0.92°C/100 years).

This graph is the centrepiece of NIWA’s temperature claims. It contributes to 

global temperature statistics and the IPCC reports. It is partly why our 

government is insisting on introducing an ETS scheme and participating in the 

climate conference in Copenhagen. But it’s an illusion.

Dr Jim Salinger (who no longer works for NIWA) started this graph in the 1980s 

when he was at CRU (Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, 

UK) and it has been updated with the most recent data. It’s published on NIWA’s 

website at http://www.niwa.co.nz/our-science/climate/information-andresources/clivar/pastclimate and in their climate-related publications.

The actual thermometer readings

To get the original New Zealand temperature readings, you register on NIWA's 

web site, download what you want and make your own graph. We did that, but 

the result looked nothing like the official graph. Instead, we were surprised to get 

this:
Straight away you can see there’s no slope—either up or down. The 

temperatures are remarkably constant way back to the 1850s. Of course, the 

temperature still varies from year to year, but the trend stays level—statistically 

insignificant at 0.06°C per century since 1850.

Putting these two graphs side by side, you can see huge differences. What is 

going on? 

Why does NIWA’s graph show strong warming, but graphing their own raw data 

looks completely different? Their graph shows warming, but the actual 

temperature readings show none whatsoever!

Have the readings in the official NIWA graph been adjusted?

It is relatively easy to find out. We compared raw data for each station (from 

NIWA’s web site) with the adjusted official data, which we obtained from one of 

Dr Salinger’s colleagues. Requests for this information from Dr Salinger himself 

over the years, by different scientists, have long gone unanswered, but now we 

might discover the truth.

Proof of man-made warming

What did we find? First, the station histories are unremarkable. There are no 

reasons for any large corrections. But we were astonished to find that strong 

adjustments have indeed been made.
About half the adjustments actually created a warming trend where none existed; 

the other half greatly exaggerated existing warming. All the adjustments 

increased or even created a warming trend, with only one (Dunedin) going the 

other way and slightly reducing the original trend.

The shocking truth is that the oldest readings have been cranked way down and 

later readings artificially lifted to give a false impression of warming, as 

documented below. There is nothing in the station histories to warrant these 

adjustments and to date Dr Salinger and NIWA have not revealed why they did 

this.

One station, Hokitika, had its early temperatures reduced by a huge 1.3°C, 

creating strong warming from a mild cooling, yet there’s no apparent reason for it.

We have discovered that the warming in New Zealand over the past 156 years 

was indeed man-made, but it had nothing to do with emissions of CO2

—it was 

created by man-made adjustments of the temperature. It’s a disgrace.

NIWA claim their official graph reveals a rising trend of 0.92oC per century, which 

means (they claim) we warmed more than the rest of the globe, for according to 

the IPCC, global warming over the 20th century was only about 0.6°C.

Consequences

The unexplained changes to the official New Zealand temperature record cast 

strong doubt on the government’s assertions of urgency regarding so-called 

"climate change". Using NIWA’s public data, we have shown that global warming 

has not yet reached New Zealand (and what does that say for global warming?).

At a minimum, the adjustments made to the official NZ temperature record must 

be made public. NIWA’s predictions regarding climate change, including changes 

in temperatures, precipitation, winds, storms and sea levels, must be reexamined in the light of the absence of any changes in temperature to date, from 

any cause.

New Zealand’s contribution to the global statistics is now under a shadow, so 

there could be regional or even global implications of these disgraceful 

"adjustments" which should be investigated.

Now we must ask: do we really need an ETS? For, if all that "nasty" carbon 

dioxide and methane we are "pumping" into the atmosphere has utterly failed to 

increase our temperature until now, why ever should it do so in the future?

Coming soon
We analyse the adjustments made by the Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN) to temperature 

readings from around the globe and we ask: is this reasonable?

The facts and figures

Below are graphs showing both original and adjusted readings for each of the 

seven weather stations NIWA uses in its official graph. After the adjustments are 

made, the temperature trend at each station changes significantly. The seven 

stations Dr Salinger used to create the graph are (with start dates):

• Auckland (1853) 

• Masterton (1906) 

• Wellington (1862) 

• Hokitika (1866) 

• Nelson (1862) 

• Lincoln (1863) 

• Dunedin (1852)

Find the one nearest your place! Are you feeling warmer yet?

Here are all the adjustments, expressed in degrees Celsius per hundred years:

Trend: oC per century

Station Unadjusted Adjusted Difference

Auckland +0.22 +0.62 +0.40

Masterton +0.47 +1.10 +0.63

Wellington -0.51 +0.28 +0.79

Nelson -0.23 +0.47 +0.70

Hokitika -0.13 +0.76 +0.89

Lincoln +0.02 +0.89 +0.87

Dunedin +0.69 +0.54 -0.15
Six of the seven stations have had their past (pre-1950) data heavily adjusted 

downwards. In all six cases this significantly increased the overall trend. The 

trend at the remaining station, Dunedin, was decreased, but the reduction was 

not as great as the increases in the other six.

This graph helps to picture the differences. Note that, after adjustment, every 

station shows a warming trend, although, originally, three showed cooling and 

one (Lincoln) showed no trend. In every case, apart from Dunedin, a warming 

trend was either created or increased. It is highly unlikely this has happened by 

mere chance, yet to date Dr Salinger and NIWA refuse to reveal why they did it.

Comparisons at each station—before and after

The following graphs dramatically show the effect of the adjustments NIWA 

applied to the raw temperature readings. The important thing to note is the 

difference in the slopes of the two trend lines, unadjusted (blue) and adjusted 

(red). When the slope becomes a climb, or gets steeper, from left to right it 

means they created warming or made it stronger.