Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 16, 2007 / Notices 1783 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 

4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 

2 licensing basis to adopt a selective 

implementation of the alternative source 

term radiological analysis methodology. 

The amendments also revised Technical 

Specification 3.9.4, ‘‘Containment 

Penetrations.’’

Date of issuance: December 22, 2006. 

Effective date: As of the date of 

issuance and shall be implemented 

within 30 days from the date of 

issuance. 

Amendment Nos.: 236, 218 

Renewed Facility Operating License 

Nos. NPF–9 and NPF–17: Amendments 

revised the licenses and the technical 

specifications. 

Date of initial notice in Federal 

Register: August 24, 2006 (71 FR 

50105) 

The supplements dated May 4 and 

August 31, 2006, provided additional 

information that clarified the 

application, did not expand the scope of 

the application as originally noticed, 

and did not change the staff’s original 

proposed no significant hazards 

consideration determination. 

The Commission’s related evaluation 

of the amendments is contained in a 

Safety Evaluation dated. 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

Exelon Generation Company, LLC, 

Docket Nos. 50–373 and 50–374, LaSalle 

County Station, Units 1 and 2, LaSalle 

County, Illinois. 

Date of application for amendments: 

December 9, 2004, as supplemented by 

letters dated August 16, August 24, 

September 13, and October 12, 2006. 

Brief description of amendments: The 

amendments adopt Technical 

Specification Task Force (TSTF) 

Standard Technical Specification (STS) 

Change Traveler 360 (TSTF–360), 

Revision 1, ‘‘DC Electric Rewrite.’’ The 

amendment revised Technical 

Specification (TS) Section 3.8.4, ‘‘DC 

Sources-Operating,’’ TS 3.8.5, ‘‘DC 

Sources-Shutdown,’’ TS 3.8.6, ‘‘Battery 

Cell Parameters,’’ and adds a new TS 

Section 5.5.14, ‘‘Battery Monitoring and 

Maintenance Program.’’

Date of issuance: December 19, 2006. 

Effective date: As of the date of 

issuance and shall be implemented 

within 60 days. 

Amendment Nos.: 179/165. 

Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–

11 and NPF–18: The amendments 

revised the Technical Specifications and 

License. 

Date of initial notice in Federal 

Register: April 12, 2005 (70 FR 19115) 

The August 16, August 24, September 

13, and October 12, 2006 supplements 

contained clarifying information and 

did not change the NRC staff’s initial 

proposed finding of no significant 

hazards consideration. 

The Commission’s related evaluation 

of the amendments is contained in a 

Safety Evaluation dated December 19, 

2006. 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

Virginia Electric and Power Company, 

Docket Nos. 50–338 and 50–339, North 

Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2, 

Louisa County, Virginia. 

Date of application for amendment: 

May 30, 2006, as supplemented by letter 

dated June 30, 2006. 

Brief description of amendment: The 

proposed amendments would relocate 

the American Society for Testing and 

Materials (ASTM) standard being used 

to test the total particulate concentration 

of the stored fuel oil to the Technical 

Specification (TS) Bases. This proposed 

change is described in TS Task Force 

(TSTF) Standard TS Change Traveler 

TSTF–374, Rev. 0, ‘‘Revision to TS 

5.5.13 and Associated TS Bases for 

Diesel Fuel Oil.’’ In addition, the 

licensee has proposed to use a ‘‘water 

and sediment test’’ instead of the ‘‘clear 

and bright’’ test provided in TSTF–374. 

Date of issuance: December 11, 2006. 

Effective date: As of the date of 

issuance and shall be implemented 

within 30 days from the date of 

issuance. 

Amendment Nos.: 249, 229. 

Renewed Facility Operating License 

Nos. NPF–4 and NPF–7: Amendments 

change the licenses and the technical 

specifications. 

Date of initial notice in Federal 

Register: August 15, 2006 (71 FR 

46941) 

The Commission’s related evaluation 

of the amendments is contained in a 

Safety Evaluation dated December 11, 

2006. 

No significant hazards consideration 

comments received: No. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 5th day 

of January 2007. 

For The Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

John W. Lubinski, 

Deputy Director, Division of Operating 

Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. E7–321 Filed 1–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–55045; File No. SR–Amex–

2007–02] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice 

of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness 

of Proposed Rule Change Relating to 

Options Fee Changes 

January 5, 2007. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on January 4, 

2007, the American Stock Exchange LLC 

(‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the 

Securities and Exchange Commission 

(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule 

change as described in Items I, II, and 

III below, which Items have been 

substantially prepared by the Amex. 

The Amex has designated this proposal 

as one establishing or changing a 

member due, fee, or other charge 

imposed by a self-regulatory 

organization pursuant to Section 

19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–

4(f)(2) thereunder,4 which renders the 

proposal effective upon filing with the 

Commission. The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Amex proposes to modify its 

Options Fee Schedule. The text of the 

proposed rule change is available at the 

Amex, on the Amex’s Web site at 

http://www.amex.com, and at the 

Commission’s Public Reference Room. 

II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

In its filing with the Commission, the 

Amex included statements concerning 

the purpose of, and basis for, the 

proposed rule change and discussed any 

comments it received on the proposal. 

The text of these statements may be 

examined at the places specified in Item 

IV below. The Exchange has prepared 

summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, 

and C below, of the most significant 

aspects of such statements. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1784 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 16, 2007 / Notices 

5Section 6(b)(4) requires that the rules of a 

national securities exchange provide for the 

equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and 

other charges among its members and issuers and 

other persons using its facilities. 

6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 

7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 8 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 

9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 

2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 

A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Purpose of, and 

Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule 

Change 

1. Purpose 

The Exchange is proposing to amend 

its Options Fee schedule to eliminate 

the licensing fee of $0.10 a contract 

which is currently charged on options 

on the iShares Russell 1000 Index Fund 

(symbol: IWB), the iShares Russell 1000 

Growth Index Fund (symbol: IWF), the 

iShares Russell 1000 Value Index Fund 

(symbol: IWD), the iShares Russell 2000 

Index Fund (symbol: IWM), the iShares 

Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund 

(symbol: IWO), the iShares Russell 2000 

Value Index Fund (symbol: IWN), and 

the iShares Russell 3000 Index Fund 

(symbol: IWV) (collectively, the ‘‘ETF 

Options’’). 

The Exchange is proposing to 

eliminate the licensing fee applicable to 

the ETF Options as of January 3, 2007 

due to the termination of existing 

licensing agreements on December 31, 

2006. 

The Exchange asserts that the 

proposal is equitable as required by 

Section 6(b)(4) of the Act.5

2. Statutory Basis 

The proposed fee change is consistent 

with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act 6

regarding the equitable allocation of 

reasonable dues, fees, and other charges 

among exchange members and other 

persons using exchange facilities. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

The proposed rule change does not 

impose any burden on competition that 

is not necessary or appropriate in 

furtherance of the purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants, or Others 

No written comments were solicited 

or received with respect to the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing proposed rule change 

has become effective pursuant to 

Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 7 and 

paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 

thereunder 8 because it establishes or 

changes a member due, fee, or other 

charge. At any time within 60 days of 

the filing of the proposed rule change, 

the Commission may summarily 

abrogate such rule change if it appears 

to the Commission that such action is 

necessary or appropriate in the public 

interest, for the protection of investors, 

or otherwise in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

Number SR–Amex–2007–02 on the 

subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Nancy M. Morris, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–Amex–2007–02. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if e-mail is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for inspection and copying in 

the Commission’s Public Reference 

Room. Copies of such filing also will be 

available for inspection and copying at 

the Amex. All comments received will 

be posted without change; the 

Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. All submissions 

should refer to File Number SR–Amex–

2007–02 and should be submitted on or 

before February 6, 2007. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Market Regulation, pursuant to delegated 

authority.9

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7–381 Filed 1–12–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 

COMMISSION 

[Release No. 34–55048; File No. SR–Amex–

2006–119] 

Self-Regulatory Organizations; 

American Stock Exchange LLC; Notice 

of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change 

Relating to the Definition of Complex 

Trade as Applied to Trades Through 

the Options Intermarket Linkage 

January 5, 2007. 

Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the 

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 

(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2

notice is hereby given that on December 

28, 2006, the American Stock Exchange 

LLC (‘‘Amex’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with 

the Securities and Exchange 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the 

proposed rule change, as described in 

Items I, II, and III below, which Items 

have been prepared substantially by the 

Exchange. The Commission is 

publishing this notice to solicit 

comments on the proposed rule change 

from interested persons. 

I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement of the Terms of Substance of 

the Proposed Rule Change 

The Amex proposes to revise Amex 

Rule 940(b)(3) to amend the definition 

of ‘‘Complex Trade.’’ The text of the 

proposed rule change appears below, 

with additions italicized and deletions 

in [brackets]: 

Options Intermarket Linkage 

Rule 940 (a) No Change 

(b) Definitions—The following terms 

shall have the meaning specified in this 

Rule solely for the purpose of this 

Section 4: 

(1)–(2) No Change 

(3) ‘‘Complex Trade’’ means the 

execution of an order in an option series 

in conjunction with the execution of 

one or more related order(s) in different 

options series in the same underlying 

security occurring at or near the same 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES