alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Home  |  Publications  |  Topic index  |  Surveys  |  Databases  |  Search |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Keep Current!  Subscribe to NSF's Custom News Service |
|-------------------------------------------------------|
 

# Academic Research and Development Expenditures

-   Archived Publications     - Academic Research and Development Expenditures:         Fiscal Year 2000 *(NSF 02-308)*
  - Academic Research and Development Expenditures:         Fiscal Year 2000 *[Early Release Tables]*  	These tables were replaced by the report  Academic Research and Development Expenditures:        Fiscal Year 2000 *(NSF 02-308)*
  - Academic Research and Development Expenditures:         Fiscal Year 1999 *(NSF 01-329)*
  - Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 1999 *[Early Release Tables]*  	These tables were replaced by the report  Academic Research and Development Expenditures:Fiscal Year 1999 *(NSF 01-329)*  
  - Academic R&D Spending Continues         Steady Growth in FY 1998 *(NSF 00-326)*
  - Academic Research and Development Expenditures:         Fiscal Year 1998 *(NSF 00-330)*
  - Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 1998 *[Early Release Tables]*  		These tables were replaced by the report  Academic Research and Development Expenditures:Fiscal Year 1998 *(NSF 00-330)*  
  - Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 1997 *(NSF 99-336)* 
  - Public Use Statistical Data Files: Fiscal Year 1997 
  - Guide to the Data Files: Fiscal Year 1997
  - Academic R&D Expenditures Maintain Steady Growth in FY 1996 *(NSF 98-303)*
  - Academic Research and Development Expenditures: Fiscal Year 1996 *(NSF 98-304)*
  - Public Use Statistical Data Files: Fiscal Year 1996
  - Guide to the Data Files: Fiscal Year 1996 
  - Academic R&D Spending Continued to         Grow in Fiscal Year 1995 *(NSF 97-304)* 
  - Academic Science and Engineering R&D Expenditures:         Fiscal Year 1995 
  - Selected Data on Academic Science and         Engineering R&D Expenditures: Fiscal Year 1995 
  - Public Use Statistical Data Files: Fiscal Year 
  - Academic R & D Expenditures Outpace         Inflation in Fiscal Year 1994 *(NSF 96-301)* 
  - Academic Science and Engineering R&D Expenditures:         Fiscal Year 1994 *(NSF 96-308)* 
  - Public Use Statistical Data Files: Fiscal Year         1994 
  - Federal Share of Academic R&D Climbed         to 60 Percent in Fiscal Year 1993 *(NSF 95-301)* 
  - Selected Data on Academic Science and Engineering         R&D Expenditures: Fiscal Year 1993 *(NSF-95-326)* 
  - Academic Science and Engineering R&D Expenditures:         Fiscal Year 1993 *(NSF 95-332)* 
  - Academic R&D Spending Increased in         FY 1992 *(NSF 93-324)* 
  - Academic Science and Engineering R&D Expenditures: FY 1992         *(NSF 94-324)* 

Return to the Academic Research and Development Expenditures series page.

Contact SRS
Independent Accountants' Consent



The Board of Directors
Kansas City Life Insurance Company:


We  consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  registration   statement
(No.2-07351)  on Form S-8 of Kansas  City Life  Insurance  Company of our report
dated March 20, 2001,  relating to the  financial  statements  and  supplemental
schedule of the Kansas City Life  Insurance  Company  Savings and Profit Sharing
Plan,  which report  appears in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form 11-K
of Kansas City Life Insurance Company.

                                    KPMG LLP


Omaha, Nebraska
March 23, 2001
No. 58012.

protest 199279-K (Galveston).

#### Quality Beverage Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that certain quantities were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as short landed. The protest was sustained to this extent.
No. 6630.

#### NEWSPAPER FEATURE SERVICE CO., INC., vs. SOUTHERN PUBLISHING COMPANY, INC.

Appeal from the 'Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, Division “A,” No. 113,930. Honorable T. C. W. Ellis, Judge.

*308Opinion and decree, April 12th, 1916.

Rehearing refused, May 8th, 1916.

F. B. Freeland, EL W. Eobinson, for plaintiff and appellee.

E). H. Theard, for defendant and appellant.

On. Motion to Dismiss.

Per Curiam.

Appellee moves to dismiss this suspensive appeal on the ground that the trial Court found the surety on the appeal bond insufficient.

The ruling’ of the trial Court has been reviewed by us in an application for prohibition made by the appellant *(No. 6686 of*our docket) and the ruling of the trial Court-sustained in an opinion rendered March 26th, 1916, upon which a rehearing was refused this day.

This matter is then final, as to this Court and the motion to- dismiss must now prevail.

Appeal dismissed.

On Rule On Clerk.

Per Curiam.

The appeal herein was dismissed on April 12th, 1916. The delay in which a rehearing may be applied for has therefore not expired at this time (April 14th), and the decision herein is not yet final.

Motion denied.

Opinion and decree, April 14th, 1916.
No. 47861.

#### Protests 940911-G, etc., of Kreusser & Schaad (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 47291 the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The U.S. Small Business Administration, National Small Business Development Center Advisory Board will be hosting a public meeting via conference call to discuss such matters that may be presented by members, staff of the U.S. Small Business Administration, or interested others. The conference call will be held on Tuesday, March 20, 2007 at 1 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the internal Board issues; the March 5th agency meeting with senior program management; the Association of Small Business Development Center (ASBC) Board March meeting; and congressional visits conducted by board members.

Anyone wishing to make an oral presentation to the Board must contact Erika Fischer, Senior Program Analyst, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Small Business Development Centers, 409 3rd Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416, telephone (202) 205-7045 or fax (202) 481-0681.

Matthew Teague,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-3812 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

** After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge

panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material

assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th

Cir. R. 34.1 (G). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

FEB 16 1999

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

LEE TRAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

vs.

DIANE CYPERT; KEN KLINGER,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 98-6174

(D.C. No. 97-CV-909)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.**

Mr. Lee Traylor, an inmate appearing pro se in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action, appeals from a grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants. The

district court adopted, over Mr. Traylor’s objection, the magistrate judge’s report

and recommendation. On appeal, Mr. Traylor contends that he has been denied a

liberty interest without due process and equal protection based upon classification
- 2 -

changes culminating in his transfer to the Oklahoma State Penitentiary where he

was placed in protective custody in a single cell. The summary judgment record

indicates that prison officials moved Mr. Traylor based upon safety concerns of

other inmates. Despite Mr. Traylor’s characterization of the transfer as “summary

punishment,” his due process claim is barred by Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472

(1995). The confinement alleged does not implicate a protected liberty interest. 

See id. at 486. Mr. Traylor’s equal protection challenge is likewise without

merit--Defendants established that any disparate treatment is rationally related to

a legitimate governmental purpose. See Riddle v. Mondragon, 83 F.3d 1197,

1207 (10th Cir. 1996).

We have liberally construed Mr. Traylor’s pro se pleadings, see Haines v.

Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972) (per curiam), and reviewed the district

court’s grant of summary judgment on his remaining claims de novo, see Barney

v. Pulsipher, 143 F.3d 1299, 1306 (10th Cir. 1998). We affirm for substantially

the same reasons given by the district court, including the report and

recommendation of the magistrate judge. See R. docs. 15 & 17.

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Paul J. Kelly, Jr.

Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4244 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4244

 To amend the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions 
    Act of 1994 to include in technical assistance provided by the 
  Community Development Financial Institutions Fund resources for non-
         English speaking individuals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2024

  Ms. Butler introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Community Development Banking and Financial Institutions 
    Act of 1994 to include in technical assistance provided by the 
  Community Development Financial Institutions Fund resources for non-
         English speaking individuals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Finance Language Inclusion 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION OF RESOURCES FOR NON-ENGLISH SPEAKING INDIVIDUALS IN 
              TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY THE COMMUNITY 
              DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FUND.

    Section 108(c)(1) of the Community Development Banking and 
Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C. 4707(c)(1)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``training'' and inserting ``the 
        training'';
            (2) by striking ``and development'' and inserting ``, the 
        development''; and
            (3) by striking ``products.'' and inserting ``products, and 
        the provision of outreach and resources for non-English 
        speaking individuals or individuals with limited English 
        proficiency.''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LOREN ROBINSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1051 FCD JFM P

vs.

S. CERVANTES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 1, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01051-FCD-JFM Document 16 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 1, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ November 24, 2004 motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed.

DATED:September 8, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01051-FCD-JFM Document 16 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 2
================================================================================


EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the quarterly report of Patient Portal Technologies, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas Hagan, Acting Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: August 2, 2009


                                                /s/ Thomas Hagan
                                                ----------------
                                                Thomas Hagan
                                                Acting Chief Financial Officer




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2789

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

 

VICENTE OCADIO,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-S-04-0389-MCE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 

ON AMENDED BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR

DEFENDANT OCADIO'S MOTION FOR

PRODUCTION OF CO-CONSPIRATOR

STATEMENTS WHICH FAIL TO MEET FRE

801(d)(2)(E)

Hon. Peter A. Nowinski

Plaintiff United States of America, by its counsel Assistant

United States Attorney Phillip A. Talbert, and defendant Vicente

Ocadio, by and through his counsel David G. Currie, hereby

stipulate and agree to the following amended briefing schedule

for the Government's Response and the Defendant's Reply thereto

to Defendant Ocadio's Motion for Production of Alleged CoConspirator Statements Which Fail to Meet FRE 801(d)(2)(E):

1. Government Response filed by June 16, 2005; 

2. Defendant's Reply filed by June 23, 2005. 

Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 137 Filed 06/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Date: June 14, 2005 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Phillip A. Talbert 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Date: June 14, 2005 By: /s/ David G. Currie by PAT 

 DAVID G. CURRIE, Attorney for 

 defendant VICENTE OCADIO

O R D E R

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 20, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 137 Filed 06/21/05 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.A CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2006, of
El Paso Exploration
& Production Company (the Company) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lisa A. Stewart, President, certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and (ii) that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Lisa A. StewartLisa A. StewartPresident(Principal Executive Officer)May 5, 2006
 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to El Paso
Exploration
& Production Company and will be retained by El Paso Exploration & Production
Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(Reap. Dec. 8173)

#### United States *v.*The Linen Thread Company, Inc.

Entry No. 754459-1/2.

(Decided October 31, 1952)

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FitzGibbon,*special attorney), for tbe plaintiff.

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Hadley S. King*of counsel) for tbe defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is $60 per one thousand for cork floats described as “Special *4”*and $40 per one thousand for cork floats described as “Regular 4”, both net packed, less freight $249.15, less carriage, shipping charges, and consular fees of 646.50 pesetas at the rate of exchange of 45 pesetas to $1.00.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above entitled case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was $60 per one thousand for cork floats described as “Special *4"”*and $40 per one thousand for cork floats described as “Regular *4",”*both net packed, less freight $249.15, less carriage, shipping charges, and consular fees of 646.50 pesetas at the rate of exchange of 45 pesetas to $1.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32359-32360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13984]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting for EAC Board of Advisors (Amended).

DATE AND TIME: Monday, June 6, 2011, 8:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m. and Tuesday, 
June 7, 2011, 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m.

[[Page 32360]]

PLACE: Westin Washington, DC, City Center Hotel, 1400 M Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20005, Phone number (202) 429-1700.

PURPOSE: The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Board of 
Advisors will meet to receive updates on EAC's program activities and 
budget. The Board will receive updates on the Voting System Testing and 
Certification program. The Board will hear updates from a special 
committee on Defining Issues of Voting System Sustainability. The Board 
will hear presentations by the National Institute of Standards and 
Technology (NIST) and the Federal Voting Assistance Program (FVAP) on 
UOCAVA internet voting and common data format. The Board will receive 
updates on EAC grants programs including: the Accessible Voting 
Technology Initiative; and the Pre-Election Logic and Accuracy Testing 
and Post-Election Audit Initiative. The Board will receive updates on 
EAC research and studies. The Board will hear a presentation on a 
Rutgers report on Voter Participation of People with Disabilities in 
2010. The Board will hear other committee reports, elect officers and 
consider motions. The Board will consider other administrative matters.
    Members of the public may observe but not participate in EAC 
meetings unless this notice provides otherwise. Members of the public 
may use small electronic audio recording devices to record the 
proceedings. The use of other recording equipment and cameras requires 
advance notice to and coordination with the EAC's Communications 
Office.
    This meeting will be open for public observation.

STATEMENT OF EXCEPTIONAL CIRCUMSTANCES:
    The Monday, May 23, 2011 notice of the EAC Board of Advisors 
Meeting inadvertently omitted the fact that the notice would published 
in the Federal Register 14 days prior to the dates of the meeting 
instead of the required 15 days notice. Late notice was unavoidable due 
to the short timeline following the approval of the meeting agenda and 
the intent that the notice would publish on Friday, May 20, 2011.

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener. Telephone: (202) 
566-3100.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-13984 Filed 6-2-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
```
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13 - 22 - 00477 - CR ROY GUZMAN JR. AKA ROY JUNIOR GUZMAN v. THE STATE OF TEXAS On Appeal from the 454th Judicial District Court of Medina County, Texas Tr ial Cou rt Cause No. 17- 08 -12519- CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. June 22, 2023