alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements Contained in the accompanying Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety by reference To such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                          1,000

<S>                                      <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        JAN-29-2000      JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                             OCT-30-1999      OCT-30-1999
<CASH>                                             0            4,896
<SECURITIES>                                       0                0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0            2,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0                0
<INVENTORY>                                        0           57,574
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0           69,181
<PP&E>                                             0           26,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0            7,005
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     0           92,742
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0           27,310
<BONDS>                                            0                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0                0
<PREFERRED>                                        0                0
<COMMON>                                           0              190
<OTHER-SE>                                         0           52,845
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       0           92,742
<SALES>                                       58,859          207,993
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              58,859          207,993
<CGS>                                         38,061          138,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 38,061          138,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              22,986           68,703
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               249              809
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (2,437)              59
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (2,437)              59
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0                0
<CHANGES>                                          0                0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (2,437)              59
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.13)            0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.13)            0.00


</TABLE>
#### ORAN K. HENDERSON, Colonel, U. S. Army, Petitioner v PETER S. WONDOLOWSKI, Colonel, Military Judge, Respondent

21 USCMA 63, 44 CMR 117

Miscellaneous Docket No. 71-32

August 20, 1971

*Lieutenant Colonel Frank J. Dorsey,*Counsel for Petitioner.

Memorandum Opinion of the Court

Charges alleging, inter alia, dereliction of duty, in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892, have been preferred against petitioner. A general court-martial to which the charges have been referred is scheduled to convene on August 23, 1971.

It appears from the Petition for Extraordinary Relief, presently under consideration, that petitioner filed a motion to make the specification of the dereliction of duty charge more definite and certain. This motion was briefed and argued by the parties before the military judge of said court-martial (see Article 39(a), Uniform Code, supra, 10 USC § 839(a)). The motion was denied.

Thereafter, petitioner filed a motion for a bill of particulars and it was denied by the military judge.

*64A petition for writ of mandamus to require the military judge to cause the said specification to be made more definite and certain was submitted to the United States Army Court of Military Review, and was denied by that tribunal.1

On August 16, 1971, petitioner submitted an oral motion to the military judge seeking dismissal of the said specification for failure to allege an offense. The motion was taken under advisement by the military judge who declared he would announce his decision thereon on August 23, 1971, the date trial on the merits is scheduled to commence.

Petitioner now files this Petition for Extraordinary Relief seeking:

> (1) A writ prohibiting the respondent, military judge, from proceeding with trial as to the specification in question or order it dismissed.

> (2) An order directing the specification be made more definite and certain, or, in the alternative, to require respondent to direct the prosecution to provide petitioner with a bill of particulars.

> (3)Written briefs and oral arguments by the parties on the issue raised.

It is apparent from the foregoing summary of petitioner’s representations that each action he seeks has been made the subject of an appropriate motion in the trial forum and of his petition before the Court of Military Review. The issue is therefore preserved for review at each stage of appellate review required or permitted by the Uniform Code, supra.

The petition sets forth no basis for a conclusion that any action of the military judge or of the Court of Military Review tends to deprive this Court of jurisdiction to review the proceedings in due course, or to provide relief from any error which may, upon such review, be shown to have occurred with respect to the rulings he now challenges (28 USC § 1651 (a); Gale v United States, 17 USCMA 40, 37 CMR 304 (1967)).

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

1

 We express no opinion respecting the applicability of 28 USC § 1651(a) to Courts of Military Review.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002.**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hayes LemmerzInternational, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for thequarterly period ended October 31, 2006 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Curtis J. Clawson, President andChief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge:          1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents,    in all material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     /s/ Curtis J. Clawson           Curtis J. Clawson *President and Chief Executive Officer*December 11, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS AND THE STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AS OF AND FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         107,516
<SECURITIES>                                   437,825
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,608
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               563,218
<PP&E>                                          11,914
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 687,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,630
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       683,317
<OTHER-SE>                                    (19,947)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   687,406
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,077
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                39,392
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 317
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,298)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,298)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,298)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLAR

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          79,347
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,777
<ALLOWANCES>                                       165
<INVENTORY>                                      5,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,817
<PP&E>                                           4,789
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  94,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,006
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,930
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    94,999
<SALES>                                          4,303
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,500
<CGS>                                            2,254
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    33
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    27
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,867)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,867)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,867)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
## Williams , Rene e (OST) t^cttj - 'QOT - 0 6>T - 2.00^ - /^5 ^

3 From : cyri l hetheringto n [cyhmly@hotmail.com ] Sent : Wednesday , Jun e 23 , 201 0 3:1 9 P M To : Williams , Rene e (OST ) Subject : Manle yEA S Ou rcurren t ai rcarrie r,Warbelo wha s provide d goo d servic e an d acceptabl e fo rrenewal . C yhetheringto n an d Ton n hetheringto n ,Resident s i n Manle yHo tSprings . Ou rpresen t airpor t serve s u s wel l bu t need s a littl e ADO Tmaintenance.Than k you . Th e Ne wBus yi s no t th e ol d busy . Search , cha tan d e-nnai l fro m you rinbox . Ge tstarted .

- a C 3
Exhibit 32.2

ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
                               PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this quarterly report of Essex Portfolio, L.P. on Form 10-
Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Michael J. Schall, Chief
Financial Officerof Essex Property Trust, Inc., the general partner of
the registrant Essex Portfolio, L.P., hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

August 13, 2003

By: /s/ MICHAEL J. SCHALL

Michael J. Schall
                  Cheif Financial Officer

---
AAM-12-366-E 

May 29, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10546 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0531 

Mr. Christopher Donovan 

Boston Executive Helicopters 

209 Access Road 

Norwood, MA 02062 

Dear Mr. Donovan: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 3, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Boston Executive Helicopters(BEH) for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow BEH to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to BEH. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing 

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of 

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was 

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Boston Executive Helicopters an exemption from 

14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow BEH to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations 

described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of BEH are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times 

while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the BEH part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on June 30, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4413 — Apollo Group/GE Advanced Materials)

(2006/C 267/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----
No. 57690.

#### International Dairy Engineering Company *v.*United States,

protest 205608-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS
  
 I,
Steven J. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., an Illinois
corporation (the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
the Report on Form 10-Q for the period of the Registrant ending June
30, 2010 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
  (2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
 Dated:  August
16, 2010
 By                 /s/ Steven J.
Cohen
 Steven J. Cohen
 President and Director
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 11.01

                      STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS

The calculation of earnings per share is detailed in the table below:

                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                      SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                 ------------------------
                                                      1999        1998
EARNINGS
Net income (in thousands)                             $207        $722
                                                 ---------   ---------

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES
Outstanding common stock during the period       4,933,900   4,933,900
Contingently issuable shares                        85,107           -
                                                 ---------   ---------

BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES          5,019,007   4,933,900
Effect of dilutive stock options and other
contingent shares                                      995           -
                                                 ---------   ---------

DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES        5,020,002   4,933,900
                                                 =========   =========
Basic earnings per share                             $0.04       $0.15
                                                 =========   =========
Diluted earning per share                            $0.04       $0.15
                                                 =========   =========

During the  three-month  period ended  September  30, 1999,  the Company  issued
options to purchase  7,500  shares of its common  stock at an exercise  price of
$7.50.  The above dilutive  earnings per share  calculations for the three-month
period  ended  September  30,  1999 and 1998,  exclude  the effect of options to
purchase 339,000 and 294,000,  respectively,  shares of common stock at exercise
prices  ranging  from  $9.1875 to $12.00  per  share,  due to the fact they were
anti-dilutive.  Also  see  "Note  4  (Goodwill)  to the  Consolidated  Condensed
Financial  Statements"  related  to  contingently  issuable  shares  related  to
acquisitions. The effect of contingent shares related to the guaranteed earn-out
amount not paid at the  closing  of the  Sunbelt  acquisition  and the effect of
satisfactory  completion  of part of the  first  contingent  earn-out  has  been
included  in the above  basic  earnings  per share  calculations.  However,  the
remainder  of the first  contingent  earn-out  and all of the second  contingent
earn-out are not  included,  as the  conditions  necessary  for such  contingent
shares to be issued have not been met as of September  30,  1999.  The effect of
contingent  shares  related  to the first and  second  earnouts  of AMCC are not
included,  as determination of the amount of such contingent shares to be issued
are not determinable.
REGULATION IV 

AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT REGULATIONS

Rule 401 Permit Required

Any person building, altering, or replacing any source of air contaminants shall 

first obtain an Authority to Construct from the Air Pollution Control Officer. An 

Authority to Construct shall remain in effect until the Permit to Operate for that 

source for which the application was filed is either granted or denied or until 

termination pursuant to other provisions of this Regulation. 

Major sources subject to Title V of the Clean Air Act of 1990, shall also comply 

with the requirements of Rule 522 Title V - Federal Operating Permits. The 

applicant for a major source shall apply to the U.S. EPA for applicable federal 

requirements pursuant to Title I of the Clean Air Act of 1990, that have not been 

delgated to the District. 

Northern Sierra AQMD Rule 400 - 1 Amended 

Rules & Regulations 05/11/94
Exhibit 99(j)



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Westar Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002 (the Report), which this certification accompanies, William B. Moore, in my capacity as Chairman of the Board and President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, and Mark A. Ruelle, in my capacity as Vice President and
Treasurer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify that the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|      |  |                |  | 
|----- |  | -------------- |  | 
|     
|Date: |  | April 15, 2003 |  | 
|      |  |                |  | 















|      |  |                |  | 
|----- |  | -------------- |  | 
|     
|Date: |  | April 15, 2003 |  | 
|      |  |                |  | 





The forgoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed
filed by the Company as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 46686.

#### Protests 25532-K, etc., of Central Vermont Railway, Inc. (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protests were sustained to that extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JULIUS JONES, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0950 LKK CMK P

vs.

DAVE RUNNELS, et al.,

Respondents.

 / ORDER

On August 7, 2006, petitioner filed a status report indicating that counsel had

obtained all necessary records, had to prepare an amended petition, and had to meet with

petitioner to review said amended petition. Accordingly, petitioner’s counsel requests an

additional time to file an amended petition. 

Good Cause Appearing, IT IS ORDERED THAT petitioner is granted an

extension of time to file an amended petition, and petitioner shall file an amended petition on or

before August 28, 2006. 

DATED: August 10, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00950-LKK -CMK Document 34 Filed 08/10/06 Page 1 of 1