alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Consent of Independent Auditors


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of International Dairy Queen, Inc. of our report dated January 10, 1997,
included in the 1996 Annual Report to Shareholders of International Dairy Queen,
Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of International Dairy
Queen, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-40784, 33-52781, and 33-58615) on Form S-8 of our report dated January
10, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated
herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with
respect to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of International Dairy Queen, Inc.



Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 19, 1997


/S/ Ernst & Young LLP
    Ernst & Young LLP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DONALD E. BENSON, MARYLAN J. BENSON, Case. No. CIV.S – 04 - 1249 

DONALD BENSON FAMILY LLC 

 Plaintiffs, 

 ORDER, 

v. DISMISSING DONALD E. 

 BENSON AS PLAINITFF 

 [FRCP RULE 25] 

CREST ENERGY, INC., a business entity form 

unknown, CREST OIL & GAS MANAGEMENT 

CORP., a business entity form unknown, CREST 

OIL NATURAL GAS MANAGEMENT CORP., 

a business entity form unknown, NQ TX 

QUIBONO,a business entity form unknown, 

EDWIN P. HORAN 111 and DOES 1 through 

100, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________________/ 

Barry G. Coleman, Esq. (CSB # 75383) Gregory J. Brod (CSB # 184456) 

Larry Rothman & Associates BROD LAW FIRM, P.C. 

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendants 

2400 E. Katella, Suite 320 633 Battery Street, Suite 640 

Anaheim, CA 92806 San Francisco, CA 94111 

FAX (714) 363-0229 FAX (415) 397-2121 

______________________________/ 

ORDER, DISMISSING DONALD E. BENSON AS PLAINTIFF 

Pursuant to FRCP Rule 25, and the NOTICE TO THE COURT OF 

SUGGESTION OF DEATH (“Notice”) filed and served by Defendant/Counter-Claimant 

CREST OIL & GAS MANAGEMENT CORP. (“CREST”) on September 16, 2005, 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-01249-FCD-EFB Document 31 Filed 01/05/06 Page 1 of 3
2

DONALD E. BENSON was to be dismissed as a Plaintiff to this action unless a 

substitution of parties was made on his behalf within 90 days of September 16, 2005. 

As the prescribed 90-day period has elapsed and no request for a substitution of 

parties has been made, DONALD E. BENSON is hereby dismissed as a plaintiff from the 

First Amended Complaint For Damages, with prejudice. 

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

HON. FRANK C. DAMRELL, JR. 

 

Signed at Sacramento, California, on January 4, 2006 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-01249-FCD-EFB Document 31 Filed 01/05/06 Page 2 of 3
3

_________________________________ 

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on this 21st day of December, 2005, I served by first-class mail, 

postage pre-paid, a true copy of the foregoing [PROPOSED] ORDER, DISMISSING 

DONALD E. BENSON AS PLAINTIFF thereof on counsel for Plaintiffs/CounterDefendants listed below: 

Larry Rothman, Esq. 

Larry Rothman & Associates 

2400 E. Katella, Suite 320 

Anaheim, CA 92806 

FAX (714) 363-0229 

Attorney for Defendant/Counter-Claimant 

_______________________________ 

Gregory Brod 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-01249-FCD-EFB Document 31 Filed 01/05/06 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 31.1
                           Section 302 Certifications

I, Michael Sheriff, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this annual report on form 10-KSB of The X- Change
Corporation, Inc.,

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in exchange act rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: March 24, 2004
/S/ Michael Sheriff
Michael Sheriff
C.E.O., President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
No. 53529.

protests 60649-K, etc. (Los Angeles and Portland, Oreg.).

#### Quon Quon Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 31.2
 CFO Certification
 
 I, Stanley Tepper, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Warning Model Management Inc. (the "Company");
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
 controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 Date: August 20 , 2004
 
 
 /s/ Stanley Tepper
 Stanley Tepper
 Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statements:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Form S-8, Nos. 2-36778, 2-56410,
    33-30530, and 333-101091 pertaining to the Long Term Stock
    Incentive Plan and predecessor stock plans, and outstanding
    effective registration statements on Form S-16 included in
    certain such S-8 filings;
|
| | Form S-8, No. 33-56369, pertaining to
    the JP Teamshare Plan and Guarantee Thrift Savings Plan and
    Trust;                                                                                                                                            
|
| | Form S-8, Nos. 33-64137, and
    333-109090, pertaining to the Non-Employee Directors Stock
    Option Plan                                                                                                                                                

of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation of our report
dated February 2, 2004, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of Jefferson-Pilot
Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for
the year ended December 31, 2003.



| |                      
| | ---------------------
| | /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Greensboro, North Carolina

March 11, 2004


E-21
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Tax incentive guide forbusinesses in the renewal communities, empowerment zones, and enterprisecommunities**
 
2001 | 2003
 
SuDoc Number:HH 1.108/4:
Item Number:0582-E-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000813330
 
February 11, 2020
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Data Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert
W. Howe, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert W. Howe
--------------------------
Robert W. Howe
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,600,241
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,089,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          760,678
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,185,939)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,089,329
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,296,569
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             425,337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,721,906)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,721,906)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,721,906)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.083)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.083)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JESSE SIMPKINS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1433 DFL PAN P

vs.

FOOTHILL ORTHOPEDIC, et al., 

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed March 27, 2006, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within thirty

days, why his action should not be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and

plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court's order.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01433-DFL-PAN Document 53 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: April 25, 2006. 

/001; simp1433.fsc

Case 2:04-cv-01433-DFL-PAN Document 53 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 In his objections to the findings and recommendations, respondent asks that the court

1

not adopt the magistrate judge’s ruling that the record be expanded in the manner requested by

petitioner on May 31, 2005. Resp’t’s Objections at 14. Respondent’s request is not properly

brought before this court in objections to findings and recommendations. Requests for

reconsideration of a ruling made by a magistrate judge must be made in accordance with local

rule 72-303(b) & (c). 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER A. TAYLOR,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0981 LKK KJM P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 14, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Both parties

have filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

1

Case 2:04-cv-00981-LKK -KJM Document 30 Filed 09/28/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 14, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Respondent’s June 27, 2005 motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in

part as follows:

A. Granted as to any claims arising from petitioner’s 1994, 1996 and 1998 

 parole hearings; and

B. Denied in all other respects.

3. Respondent is directed to file an answer within sixty days from the date of this

order.

DATED: September 28, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-00981-LKK -KJM Document 30 Filed 09/28/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEVIN B. JOHNSON,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0892 DFL DAD P

vs.

JIM HAMLET, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s May 16, 2005 application for enlargement of time is granted.

2. On or before June 16, 2005, petitioner shall file and serve either:

(a) a statement that petitioner will stand on his existing petition; such a

statement may be accompanied by supplemental points and authorities in

support of the existing petition; or

(b) a motion for leave to amend, accompanied by a proposed amended

petition that contains exhausted claims only; such a motion may be joined

with a motion to stay this action pending exhaustion of additional claims;

all motions shall be noticed for hearing before the undersigned and shall

be briefed in accordance with Local Rule 78-230(a)-(d).

DATED: May 17, 2005.

DAD:13

john0892.ext

Case 2:04-cv-00892-MCE -DAD Document 28 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

April 23, 1947

No. 51672.

#### Petition 6562-R of Golding Bros. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial the treasurer of the importing company testified that he conferred repeatedly with the customs officials before entry concerning the value of the merchandise and that he cooperated fully with them in furnishing requested information upon which the appraisal was ultimately based. From the record it was held that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that found on final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.