alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 1 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 2 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 3 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 4 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 5 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 6 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 7 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 8 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 9 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 10 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 11 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 12 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 13 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 14 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 15 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 16 of 17

Case 2:01-cv-01229-SD   Document 55   Filed 10/02/03   Page 17 of 17
No. 50428.

#### Protests 42050-K/89610, etc., of Marshall Field & Co. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. DR-CAFTA-103-016] 

# AGENCY:

United States International Trade Commission. 

# ACTION:

Clarification of scope of investigation, change in title, and extension of deadline for filing written submissions.

      ( print page 9354)    

# SUMMARY:

                        The title of the investigation as published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 9, 2007 (72 FR 7455) suggests that the Commission will provide advice limited to the probable economic effect of modification of certain rules of origin in the Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement for certain apparel goods of Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic only. However, the text of the notice indicates that the Commission will provide such advice with respect to the probable economic effect of modification of the rules of origin on such apparel goods of all the parties to the agreement. The Commission's intent to is provide the broader advice. Accordingly, the title of the investigation is amended to delete “of Costa Rica and the Dominican Republic.” To allow additional time for any interested parties who may have been confused by the title, the Commission has extended the deadline for filing written submissions in this investigation from March 2, 2007 to March 16, 2007.                     

All other information in the notice published on February 9, 2007, including with respect to Commission contacts, background information, and requirements for submitting written statements (except for the deadline) remains the same. 

 Issued: February 23, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

 [FR Doc. E7-3539 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Luna Innovations Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Dale E. Messick, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|                                       
|/s/ DALE E. MESSICK                    
|Dale E. Messick Chief Financial Officer

May 9, 2008
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

| Confirmed: KOHLBERG & COMPANY, L.L.C By:  /s/ Christopher W. AndersonName: Christopher W. AndersonTitle: Partner | CONTINENTAL COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS, LLC By:  /s/ James W. ShafferName: James W. ShafferTitle: Vice President & CFO                            |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                     | GLIT / GEMTEX, LTD. By:  /s/ James W. ShafferName: James W. ShafferTitle: Vice President & CFO                                        |
|                                                                                                                                     | KATY INDUSTRIES, INC.a Delaware corporation By:  /s/ James W. ShafferName: James W. ShafferTitle: Vice President & CFO                |
|                                                                                                                                     | PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Lender and as Agent By:  /s/ Glenn D. KreutzerName:  Glenn D. KreutzerTitle:  Vice President  |
|                                                                                                                                     | PNC BANK, CANADA BRANCH, as Lender By:  /s/ Stephen B. SmithName:  Stephen B. SmithTitle:  Vice President                  |

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANNE NELSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1103 DFL KJM PS

vs.

PLACER COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On March 13 and March 22, 2006, the Magistrate Judge issued orders denying plaintiff’s

request for appointment of counsel and granting defendants’ motion to compel . On March 30,

2006, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of those orders. In addition, on April 4, 2006,

the Magistrate Judge issued an order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants

Armstrong, Bloomfield, McInerney, Meeh, and LaBouff. On April 21, 2006, plaintiff filed a

request for reconsideration of that order as well. 

Local Rule 72-303(b), states “rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no

reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within ten court days . . . from the date of

service of the ruling on the parties.” E.D. Local Rule 72-303(b). Plaintiff’s request for

reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s order of March 13, 2006 is therefore untimely. As to

the other two orders, under E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be

Case 2:04-cv-01103-DFL -KJM Document 162 Filed 06/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

upheld unless “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court

finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge’s rulings were clearly erroneous or contrary

to law. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s March 13, 2006, March 22,

2006, and April 4, 2006 requests for reconsideration are denied.

Dated: 6/12/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01103-DFL -KJM Document 162 Filed 06/13/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer,
Chief Executive Officer of the managing owner as of October 1, 2004, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., of World Monitor TrustSeries A (Series A), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series As Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series A.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                             |  | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer                                                                                                                        |  | 
|Kenneth A. Shewer Chief Executive Officer of Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., the managing owner as of October 1, 2004 November 8, 2004
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Annual Report of K-tel International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K, asamended, for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry Dunmall,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)                                  Thereport fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed originalof this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| By                        |    /s/   LARRY DUNMALL |   |
|---------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Larry Dunmall             |                                                 |
| *Chief Financial Officer* |                                                 |
| September 18, 2006        |                                                 |
|                           |                                                      |        |  |

 

----
file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0551 Focus Ready Draft 10/4/2012 ENGINEER: Arnold \ JAS PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER:file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM] SAT (concerns) (09/25/2012):
Migration to groundwater: Moderate PBT rating: P2B1T1 . Health: 1-2 Dermal, Drinking Water, Inhalation Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 78 ppb.) OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.file:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 12-0551 Use: Number of Sites/ Location: 1 Advanced Aromatics LLC Baytown TX 77520 Days/yr: 250

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium. Water or Incineration or Landfill High End: 1.2E+2 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site or 3.0E+4 kg/yrfile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM] Air Typical: 8.3E+0 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site Worst Case: 8.3E+0 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site

Air Output 2: 2.9E-2 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 1 site

RELEASE TOTAL 3.4E+4 kg/yr - all sites
OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 23

Inhalation:

Exposure to Vapor (Class II) Typical: 4.0E+3 mg/day over 250 days/yr Worst Case: 1.2E+5 mg/day over 250 days/yr Number of workers (all sites) with inhalation exposure: 23

INHALATION MONITORING DATA REVIEW 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit or data not specific to industry): Yes 2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? Yes OR b) Hazard Rating for health of 2 or greater? 1-2 No Inhalation Monitoring Data Desired? Yes (both criteria met) Dermal: Exposure to Liquid at 100.00% concentration High End: 1.8E+3 mg/day over 250 days/yrfile:///C|/Documents%20and%20Settings/jquennev/Desktop/p120551.eng.txt[3/4/2013 12:08:22 PM] Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 23
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Scott V. Fainor,  President and Chief Executive  Officer and Eugene T. Sobol,
Senior  Executive Vice President,  Chief  Operating  Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of KNBT  Bancorp,  Inc. (the  "Company"),  hereby  certify,  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     1.   The  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of the Company  for the  quarterly
          period  ended June 30, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
          of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and


     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
          the Company.


DATE: August 16, 2004               BY: /S/  Scott V. Fainor
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Scott V. Fainor
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer



DATE: August 16, 2004               BY: /S/  Eugene T. Sobol
                                        --------------------------------------
                                        Eugene T. Sobol
                                        Senior Executive Vice
                                        President, Chief Operating Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to KNBT Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained
by KNBT Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Reap. Dec. 10956)

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 9883.

(Decided April 20, 1965)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The following appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> *625IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by counsel for the parties hereto:

> That the merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above consists of wire strand exported from Japan during the period beginning February 16, 1960 and ending Jaunary 28, 1962; that wire strand is not identified in the Pinal List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that on or immediately preceding the date of exportation of each shipment of wire strand covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above, the price at which wire strand, such as or similar to the wire strand described on the invoices covered by the instant appeal to reappraisement was freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal market of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $245 per metric ton for wire strand of *%*inch diameter (United States funds).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above is submitted for decision upon this stipulation and the entry file covered by said appeal.

The stipulated facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, is statutory export value and that such value is $245 per metric ton for wire strand of %-inch diameter (United States funds), and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE> 
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,472
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 1,668
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    159,395
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,505
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,604
<LOANS>                                        195,406
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 400,189
<DEPOSITS>                                     195,814
<SHORT-TERM>                                   103,900
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,064
<LONG-TERM>                                     38,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            68
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,342
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 400,189
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,940
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,295
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,865
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,283
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,218
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,647
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  75
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,053
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,169
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,169
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   810,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.13
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.86
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,324
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,374
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,684
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      (6)
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,678
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000540

02-DEC-2015

07:54 AM
Before the Second Division,

September 7, 1949

No. 53532.

protest 126183-K (Tampa).

#### British West Indies Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material *157respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 8,428.

#### LLEWELLYN et al. v. TWO ANCHORS AND CHAINS.

[1 Ben. 80.] 1

District Court, E. D. New York.

Oct., 1866.

Salvage — Derelict—The Whole Value Decreed.

In a case of derelict property, of small value, notice of the proceedings having been brought home to the owners of it, who failed to appear in the suit and had expressly abandoned the property to the libellants, the court awarded the whole balance ($107) to the salvors after payment of costs.

[Cited in The Carl Sehurz, Case No. 2,414.]

[This was a libel in rem by John Llewellyn and others against two anchors and chains.]

Mr. Goodrich, for libellants.

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This is a ease of salvage of two derelict anchors and chains of no great value. Although actual notice of the proceeding is brought home to the owners of the property, no appearance is entered for any claimant, and the proofs disclose that the owners in express terms abandoned the property to the libellants. In such a case the balance of the whole proceeds, after payment of the costs, may be awarded to the salvors, by whose exertions the property was saved. The William Hamilton, 3 Hagg. 43. Let a decree be entered awarding to the libellants the whole proceeds in court ($107), after deducting the costs.