alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001052743
<NAME> RECKSON SERVICE INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              48
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    36165
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 36213
<PP&E>                                              37
<DEPRECIATION>                                       2
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   36248
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            20024
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           247
<OTHER-SE>                                       15977
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     36248
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 (199)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      465
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    21
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 441
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1126)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.23)
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 21

                                 SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                STATE OR COUNTRY      PERCENTAGE
COMPANY                                         OF INCORPORATION        OWNED
-------------------------------------------  --------------------  --------------
<S>                                          <C>                   <C>
Research in Acoustics, Inc..................   New York                  100%
IAC Realty Corporation......................   New York                  100%
IAC Development Corporation.................   New York                  100%
Industrial Acoustics Company, Ltd...........   England                   100%
Intra-Acoustics Company, Ltd................   Canada                    100%
Industrial Acoustics Company, S.C. Inc. ....   South Carolina            100%
</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                      Park City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                            Certification Pursuant To
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall K. Fields,
Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: October 12, 2004


/s/ Randall K. Fields
----------------------------
Chief Executive Officer




                  (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUILLERMO CRUZ TRUJILLO,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

GOMEZ, C/O; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 16567

D.C. No. 1:14

- cv

- 01797

- DAD

DLB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 11, 2017 **

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Guillermo Cruz Trujillo, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing for failure to exhaust administrative remedies

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force

. We have juris diction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Albino v. Baca , 747 F.3d 1162, 1171 (9 th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 16567

Cir. 2014) (en banc) (legal rulings on exhaustion) ; Knievel v. ESPN , 393 F.3d

1068, 1072 (9th Cir. 2005) (Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss). We

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Trujillo’s action because it was clear

from the face of the amended complaint that Trujillo failed to exhaust his available

administrative remedies prior to filing his lawsuit. See McKinney v. Carey , 311

F.3d 1198, 1199

- 1200 (9th Cir. 2 002) (exhaustion must be completed before a

§ 1983 action is filed; exhaustion during the pendency of the litigation is

insufficient because exhaustion is a precondition to suit); see also Albino

, 747 F.3d

at 1169 (“[W]here a failure to exhaust is clear from the face of the complaint, a

defendant may successfully move to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) f or failure to

state a claim.”).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appea l. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of General Steel Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John Chen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 10, 2011
By:
/s/ John ChenJohn ChenChief Financial Officer
No. 44002.

#### Protest 985872-G of Sidney Adler & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was found that the flower pots m question are composed of only one piece of earthenware rather than two pieces and that claim was therefore sustained. A sample of the earthenware articles showed that it is in the form of a small baby carriage of white chinaware embossed in the mold. The claim at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 45 percent ad valorem as plain white earthenware under paragraph 211 was therefore sustained. *United States*v. *Todd*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 50, T. D. 38690) and T. D. 44592 cited.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOBBY W. ENDSLEY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S- 04-O990 FCD GGH P

vs.

YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPT., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §

1983. In response to plaintiff’s August 25, 2005 letter, asking that his case be dismissed until he

is out of prison, the court filed an order on September 12, 2005, presenting plaintiff with

alternatives for proceeding in this action and informing him that his voluntary dismissal of this

action would mean that he may only proceed by filing a new action. In addition to the

alternatives provided for proceeding in this action, the court also informed plaintiff that if he still

sought voluntary dismissal without prejudice of this action in its entirety, he should so inform the

court within 30 days. 

Plaintiff once again requested, by filing dated September 26, 2005, that this action

be dismissed. By order filed on October 21, 2005, defendants were directed to notify this court,

within twenty days, whether they had any objection to the dismissal of this action. On October

Case 2:04-cv-00990-FCD-GGH Document 28 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

24, 2005, defendants filed a statement of non-opposition to the dismissal of this action. Pursuant

to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), plaintiff’s request shall be honored.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's unopposed request for dismissal of

this action is granted, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a), and the Clerk of the Court is directed to

close this case.

DATED: 11/9/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

ends0990.dis

Case 2:04-cv-00990-FCD-GGH Document 28 Filed 11/08/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 32.2
                         GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350
of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of
Genesis HealthCare Corporation (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect
to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March
31, 2004 (the "Report") that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.




Date:    May 14, 2004                         James V. McKeon
      -------------------                     ---------------------------------
                                              James V. McKeon
                                              Chief Financial Officer


         The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
or as a separate disclosure document.
11

Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2013-NM-080-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED

Boeing Numerous On-going Concur.

NTSB Numerous On-going Concur.

JTSB Numerous On-going Concur.

JCAB Numerous On-going Concur.

Thales Numerous On-going Concur.

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information:
No. 57285.

protests 187555-K, etc. (New York).

#### L. Barbier *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.'

An examination of the papers showing that the protests were filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the motion to dismiss was granted.
P. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1796 Prepped by Keeia Richards
Document

Number: 

# 48 ) VI-A-0 2 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/20084:20:37

PM Sheet 48of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 Vl-A-0 2 Thi s Documen t

ha s bee n move dt o IV-A-0 2 a t th e reques t

o f th e Projec t Officer . Thi s documen t wa s incorrectl y categorize doriginally .
### powers, marilyn From: Fernandez, Cristina Sent: To: Subject: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:41 PM Mastro, Donna; powers, marilyn FW: EPA-R03-0AR-2014-0281 Categories: Purple Category
FYI Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director Office ofAir Program Planning (3AP30) Air Protection Division U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2023 Work: (215) 814-2178 Cell: (215) 375-0847
From: Robert Ukeiley [mailto:rukeiley@igc.org] 

### Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 4:07 PM To: Fernandez, Cristina 

### Cc: Hogan, Stephanie 

### Subject: EPA-R03-0AR-2014-0281 Dear Ms. Fernandez: With regard to the above referenced proposed rule, EPA cannot approve the redesignation until Maryland has PM2.5 increments fully approved into Maryland's SIP approved PSD program. Withoutthese increments, the Maryland does not have afully approved relevant SIP and does not have an adequate maintenance plan. Ifyou have any further questions aboutthis comment, please do not hesitate to ask. Sincerely, Robert Ukeiley Law Office of Robert Ukeiley 255 Mountain Meadows Road Boulder, CO 80302 Tel: 303-442-4033 rukeiley@igc.org 

### Icheckemailinfrequently. Ifthis is urgent,feelfree to call
.

1
No. 50963.

#### Protest 115734-K of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

November 14, 1957

No. 61349.

protest 306836-K (Los Angeles).

#### Cornman, Vellis & Co. and Williams, Clarke Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVE EIDEN,

NO. Civ.S-04-977 LKK/CMK

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISPOSAL

DOCUMENTS AFTER

HOME DEPOT USA, INC., and NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

HOME DEPOT #6609; HD PROPERTIES

OF MARYLAND; and DOES 1 through 10,

Defendants.

 /

Counsel for plaintiff has informed the court that the parties

have settled the above-captioned case. The court now orders that

the dispositional documents disposing of the case be filed no later

than thirty (30) days from the effective date of this order.

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby

VACATED.

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-00977-LKK -CMK Document 63 Filed 08/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 28, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-00977-LKK -CMK Document 63 Filed 08/29/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

Exhibit 21.1

                              IIC INDUSTRIES INC.

                              List of Subsidiaries


Israel Tractors and Equipment Co. Ltd. (Israel)
         Ambache  Engineering, Ltd. (Israel)


Investor Rt. (Hungary)

         Interag Rt. (Hungary)
         Agrimpex Rt. (Hungary)
         Agrimpex Kft. (Hungary)
         Agrimpex International Ltd. (UK)
         Agrimont Rt. (Hungary)
         Agriterminal Rt. (Hungary)
         Agrimill Rt. (Hungary)
         Viktoria Rt. (Hungary)
         Zenit Kft. (Hungary)
         Fortunate Rt. (Hungary)

Interag Rt. (Hungary)

         Interag Auto Kft.
         Kompakt Auto Kft.
         Ferencvarosi Autoszerviz Kft.
         Motor Pedo, Kft.
         Frigoland Kft.
         Royal Motor, Kft.
         Bunter Kft.

Balton C.P. Limited (England)

         Amiran Zambia Ltd. (Zambia)
         Dizengoff Ghana Ltd. (Ghana)
         Amiran Kenya Ltd. (Kenya)
         Tanzania Transcontinental Trading Co. Ltd. (Tanzania)
         Balton BV-DWA (Nigeria) Ltd.  (Nigeria)
         Balton (U) Ltd. Uganda (Uganda)
         Dizengoff (WA) Nigeria Limited (Nigeria)
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Alicia Borst Derrah, the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial officer of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.








Date:  May 16, 2011
/s/ Alicia Borst DerrahAlicia Borst DerrahVice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

of Man Investment (USA) Corp., the General Partner
No. 49593.

#### Protest 104796-K of National Distillers Products Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial the collector’s letter and statement of goods in warehouse referred to therein were admitted in evidence without objec*254tion of the Government. In view thereof the claim at )4 cent per pound was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.A
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Lisa A. Stewart, certify that:
1. I havereviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of El Paso Exploration& Production Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisReport;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this Report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this Report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisReport based on such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
Date: August 7, 2006          /s/ Lisa A. Stewart    Lisa A. Stewart    President(Principal Executive Officer)El Paso Exploration & Production Company
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER ANTONIO TAYLOR,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0981 EJG KJM P

vs.

T.L. CAREY, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Because petitioner may be entitled to the requested relief if the claimed violation

of constitutional rights is proved, respondent will be directed to file a response to petitioner’s

application. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file an answer within forty-five days from the date of

this order. See Rule 4, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. Respondent shall include with the

answer any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues

presented in the application. Rule 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases;

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00981-LKK -KJM Document 7 Filed 05/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Petitioner's traverse, if any, is due on or before thirty days from the date

respondent’s answer is filed;

3. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of

petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus on Jo Graves, Senior Assistant Attorney

General.

DATED: May 12, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

tayl0981.100

Case 2:04-cv-00981-LKK -KJM Document 7 Filed 05/13/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.17


 


Summary Promissory Note


 


Date: February 19, 2012


By: Email


 


Attn: UNorth LLC


274 E Hamilton Ave, Suite A


Campbell, CA 95008


 


RESOLVED, that LLC would borrow amount of $76,000 from Lily
Ju on February 19, 2012. LLC agrees to pay back the amount by March 19, 2012 with annual interest rate of 14% calculated on daily
basis. The payment schedule will be as follows:


 


Borrowed Amount: $76,000


Interest: 14.00%


Estimated Value on 03/19/12: $76,886


Daily Interest Rate: 0.038%


 


Should the LLC pay the amount later than the above date, the
interest will continue to be calculated on daily basis. In addition, amount of $4,125 will be added as bonus to the payment upon
paying back the amount.


 


	/s/ Michael Faro	 
	Michael Faro	 
	Managing Member	 
	UNorth LLC	 


 


	 	UNorth® LLC
	 	PO Box 1116, Campbell, CA 95009
	 	1.888.324.2787 tel
	 	1.408.378.7629 fax
	 	www.unorth.com