alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           6,988
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,075
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (175)
<INVENTORY>                                     11,290
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,359
<PP&E>                                          11,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,103)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  62,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,823
<BONDS>                                        105,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             4
<OTHER-SE>                                    (54,519)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,308
<SALES>                                         58,041
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,041
<CGS>                                           41,344
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,263
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   697
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,127
<INCOME-TAX>                                       368
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,759
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (1,517)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,242
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 17538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06968]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9014-2]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
    Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 03/17/2014 
Through 03/21/2014 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its 
comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html
EIS No. 20140091, Draft EIS, USFS, ID, Crooked River Valley 
Rehabilitation Project, Comment Period Ends: 05/12/2014, Contact: 
Jennie Fischer 208-983-4048
EIS No. 20140092, Final EIS, USFS, OR, Ochoco Summit Trail System, 
Review Period Ends: 04/28/2014, Contact: Marcy Anderson 541-416-6463
EIS No. 20140093, Final EIS, USFS, CA, Blacksmith Ecological 
Restoration Project, Review Period Ends: 04/28/2014, Contact: Dana 
Walsh 530-333-5558
EIS No. 20140094, Draft EIS, USFS, MT, North and West Big Hole 
Allotment Management Plans, Comment Period Ends: 05/12/2014, Contact: 
Russell Riebe 406-689-3243
EIS No. 20140095, Draft EIS, FHWA, WI, Interstate 43 North-South 
Freeway Silver Spring Drive to WI 60, Comment Period Ends: 05/12/2014, 
Contact: George Poirier 608-829-7500
EIS No. 20140096, Draft EIS, FHWA, IL, 75th Street Corridor Improvement 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 05/12/2014, Contact: Catherine A. Batey, 
217-492-4600
EIS No. 20140097, Draft EIS, OSM, NM, Four Corners Power Plant and 
Navajo Mine Energy Project, Comment Period Ends: 05/27/2014, Contact: 
Marcelo Calle 303-293-5035
EIS No. 20140098, Draft EIS, USFS, OR, Lower Imnaha Allotments 
Rangeland Analysis, Comment Period Ends: 05/12/2014, Contact: Jamie 
McCormack 541-426-5547
EIS No. 20140099, Final EIS, FHWA, MT, Billings Bypass Improvements, 
Review Period Ends: 04/28/2014, Contact: Brian Hasselbach, 406-441-3908

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20140078, Draft EIS, BLM, ID, Proposed Modification to the 
Thompson Creek Mine Plan of Operations, Section 404 Clean Water Act 
Permit Application, Public Land Disposal, and Draft Resource Management 
Plan Amendment, Comment Period Ends: 06/18/2014, Contact: Ken Gardner 
208-879-6210
Revision to the FR Notice Published 03/21/2014; Correction to EIS Title 
Name and Comment Period Ends should read 06/18/2014

    Dated: March 25, 2014
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014-06968 Filed 3-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Before the Third Division,

July 12, 1944

No. 49620.

#### Protests 899823-G, etc., of Du Val Moore & Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the cheese is similar to that passed upon in Abstracts 42146 and 42309 the claim- was sustained as to the Edam and Gouda cheese in question.
United States Court of Appeals 

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

(Argued October 30, 2000 - Decided September 21, 2001)

October 12, 2001

Before

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 98-3400, 98-4218, 99-3797

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

DENNIS M. MC GIFFEN and WALLACE

S. WEICHERDING,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeal from the United States

 District Court for the

 Southern District of Illinois.

Nos. 98 CR 30035 & 98 CR 30053

Paul E. Riley, Judge.

O R D E R

The opinion issued by this Court on September 21, 2001 is amended as follows:

Page 1, paragraph one: the order of the judges should read:

Before RIPPLE, DIANE P. WOOD and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

Page 5, first full paragraph, line 9: “Evansville” should read “Edwardsville.”

SO ORDERED.
EXHIBIT 24

                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned, an officer and/
or director of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation, a North Carolina holding company,
does hereby constitute and appoint John D. Hopkins, Robert A. Reed, Richard T.
Stange and Andrea H. Fox, and each of them (with full power of substitution
to appoint any Senior Officer, Vice President, Secretary or Assistant
Secretary of the Corporation), as his or her true and lawful attorney and
agent, to do any and all acts and things and to execute any and all instruments
which said attorney and agent may deem necessary or advisable to enable the
said Corporation to comply with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the Securities and
Exchange Commission in respect thereof, in connection with the filing of the
annual report for the year 1998 or any later year on Form 10-K, including
specifically, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the power
and authority to sign for and on behalf of the undersigned the name of the
undersigned as officer and/or director of the said Corporation to any such
Form 10-K or to any amendment thereto filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and to any instrument or document filed as part of, as an exhibit
to or in connection with, said Form 10-K or amendment; and the undersigned
does hereby ratify and confirm as his or her own act and deed all that said
attorney and agent (or the substitute) shall do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed these presents.

     (SEAL)                            ____________________________________
                                       Name: 
                                       Date: February 8, 1999
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DWAYNE EICHLER,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-1108-GEB-JFM-P

vs.

CDC OFFICER SHERBIN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 30, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01108-GEB-JFM Document 119 Filed 10/03/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 30, 2006, are adopted in full;

and

2. Plaintiff’s June 12, 2006 motion for preliminary injunction is denied. 

Dated: October 2, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01108-GEB-JFM Document 119 Filed 10/03/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 54036.

#### M. G. Krohn & Co., Inc., and Uddo & Taormina Co. *v.*United States,

protests 144446-K and 144759-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protests were sustained to this extent.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6172

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSE ANTONIO GARCIA, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge. (CR-98-1136; CA-04-2558) Submitted: April 14, 2005 Decided: April 21, 2005 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose Antonio Garcia, Appellant Pro Se. Miller Williams Shealy, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jose Antonia Garcia seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Garcia has not made the requisite showing to obtain a certificate of appealability. We, therefore, deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES L. DAVIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1390 LKK EFB P

vs.

TERESA A. SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Defendant Schwartz requests an extension of time to serve responses to

interrogatories. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b).

Defendant’s September 20, 2006, request is granted and defendant Schwartz has

30 days from the date this order is served to serve responses to interrogatories.

So ordered. 

Dated: September 29, 2006.

\schw1390. grnt def eot

Case 2:04-cv-01390-LKK -EFB Document 46 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 1
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT We ProtectHoosiers andOurEnvironment. MitchellE. DanielsJr. Governor Thomas W. Easterly Commissioner

Mr. George T. Czerniak Acting Director, Air and Radiation Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 77 WestJackson Boulevard Chicago, Illinois 60604-3950

Dear Mr. Czerniak: May 24, 2012 100 North Senate Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 (317) 232-8603 Toll Free (800) 451-6027 www.idem.IN.gov

Re: Clarification on Indiana's December 12, 2011 "Infrastructure" State Implementation Plan to Address the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National AmbientAir Quality Standards (NAAQS)

This letter is in response to a request by your stafffor clarification regarding Indiana's infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. Specifically, we wantto clarify how our existing SIP meets the requirements ofSection 110(a)(2)(D)(ii), relating to Section 115 and Section 126 ofthe Clean AirAct. Indiana has no pending obligations under Section 115 ofthe Clean AirAct, which pertains to international pollution abatement. With respect to the requirements ofSection 126(a), which would require Indiana to notify neighboring States of new or modified sources, Indiana's U.S. EPA-approved Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration (PSD) regulations contain the provisions to satisfythe applicable requirements of Section 126(a). Indiana has no obligations under Section 126{b), which pertains to petitions for finding that major sources emit or would emit prohibited air pollutants. Ifyou have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Deloney, Air Programs Branch Chief, Office ofAir Quality at (317) 233-5694.

KB/cp cc: Scott Deloney, IDEM RecycledPaper 

### (i) Sincerely,

Keith Baugues Assistant Commissioner Office ofAir Quality

An Equal OpportunityEmployer Please Recycle 

### 0
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERGEI PORTNOY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1462 GEB JFM PS

vs.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, F.A.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled

action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On April 22, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and

which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. 

No objections to the findings and recommendations have been

filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

Case 2:04-cv-01462-GEB -JFM Document 27 Filed 05/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 22,

2005, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant’s March 7, 2005 motion to compel

arbitration is granted;

3. The parties are directed to arbitrate all claims,

pursuant to 9 U.S.C. § 1et seq. and California Code of Civil

Procedure § 1281.1;

4. Defendant’s March 7, 2005 motion to stay this

action is granted; this action is stayed in its entirety pending

arbitration; 

5. The Clerk of the Court is directed to

administratively close this action pending arbitration; and

6. The parties are directed to notify this court

within thirty days of any decision rendered by the American

Arbitration Association.

Dated: May 19, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01462-GEB -JFM Document 27 Filed 05/20/05 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:**Current industrial reports. MA335F, Major household appliances

 
SuDoc Number: C 3.158/58:
Item Number:0142-A-71 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000556256
 
1992 |1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |2006 |2007 |2008 |2009 |2010 | 
 
January 25, 2023
 
Full run of zipped Annual issues, 1993-2010, available here:https://permanent.fdlp.gov/lps39100/files.zip
 
Archived capture of Census index page for title, as it appearedin 2008:
https://permanent.fdlp.gov/websites/www.census.gov/www.census.gov/cir/www/335/ma335f.html
 
 
Archived capture of Census index page for title, as itappeared in 2023:
https://permanent.fdlp.gov/websites/www.census.gov/2023/www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/econ/cir/ma335f.html
 
 
Live address, as of 2/2023: https://www.census.gov/data/tables/time-series/econ/cir/ma335f.html
Case No. 6,723.

#### HOUGH v. SMOOT.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 318.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May Term, 1822.

Attachment — Acts Ms. 1795, c. 56.

An attachment under the Maryland act of 1795 (chapter 56) will lie against lands and tenements in Alexandria county.

[Action at law by George S. Hough against James H. Smoot]

This was an attachment • issued by CKANCH, Chief Judge, out of court, and in vacation, against the lands and tenements in the county of Alexandria, of the defendant, under the act of Maryland of 1795, c. 69,- and the act of congress of the 24th of June, 1812, § 4 (2 Stat. 755).

Mr. Swann, for defendant,

stated that if the court should be of opinion that the process would lie, the defendant would give bail and set aside the attachment.

THE COUET

(nem. con.), upon an examination of the act of congress of the 24th of June, 1812, § 4 (2 Stat. 755), and the acts of Maryland of 1715, c. 40, and 1795, c. 56, was of opinion that this process was extended to the county of Alexandria, so far as regards the attachment of lands and tenements.

There was no argument of counsel upon the point
Exhibit 10(b)


                      AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT



           THIS AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ("Amendment") is entered
into as of April 10, 2000, between JACOBSON STORES INC., a Michigan
corporation of Jackson, Michigan (the "Company"), and PAUL W. GILBERT, of
Jackson, Michigan ("Gilbert").

           THE PARTIES HEREBY AGREE that the restated Employment Agreement
between them dated as of June 11, 1998, as amended effective April 11, 1999
(the "Agreement"), is further amended effective April 16, 2000, as follows:

           Compensation. The phrase "Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars
($350,000)" in paragraph 2 of the amended Agreement is amended to read "Four
Hundred Thousand Dollars ($400,000)".

           Except as expressly amended hereby, the Agreement shall continue
in full force and effect.


IN THE PRESENCE OF:                    JACOBSON STORES INC.



/s/  Dana J. Collins                   By: /s/ P. Gerald Mills
---------------------------                ---------------------------------
                                             P. Gerald Mills
                                             Its: Chairman of the Board and
                                                      Chief Executive Officer







/s/  Timothy J. Spalding               /s/  Paul W. Gilbert
---------------------------            -------------------------------------
                                       Paul W. Gilbert
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clifton Savings Bancorp, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as added by ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                the Report.




                               /s/ John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               John A. Celentano, Jr.
                               Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer



                               /s/ Christine R. Piano
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Christine R. Piano
                               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


Date: August 7, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4465 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4465

       To reauthorize the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2024

Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Merkley) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To reauthorize the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Uyghur Human Rights Policy 
Reauthorization Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 6(h) of the Uyghur Human Rights Policy Act of 2020 (Public 
Law 116-145; 22 U.S.C. 6901 note) is amended by striking ``5 years 
after'' and inserting ``10 years after''.
                                 <all>
```