alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA

BILLY TYLER, )

)

Plaintiff, ) 8:06CV523

) 

v. ) 

) 

AT&T, et al., ) ORDER

)

Defendants. )

______________________________)

The plaintiff has filed a notice of appeal but has

failed to pay the filing fee of $455.00. In addition, he has not

filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, now has he filed any

affidavit supporting such a motion. If plaintiff intends to

appeal in forma pauperis, he must also file with the Court a

statement of his inmate trust account for the past six months. 

Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff is granted until September

29, 2006, to comply with these requirements. 

DATED this 14th day of September, 2006.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lyle E. Strom

______________________________

LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge

United States District Court

Case: 8:06-cv-00523-LES-PRSE Document #: 23 Date Filed: 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
ex105.htm












PROMISSORY NOTE







USD $5,240.00                                                                                              Date:  June 30, 2016












TO:  Edward Aruda







The undersigned, Vet Online Supply Inc. (the “Borrower”), HEREBY PROMISES TO PAY to the order of Edward Aruda no later than June 30, 2017 (the “Payment Date”), Five Thousand Two Hundred and Forty United States Dollars (USD $5,240.00) (the “Loan Amount”).  The Loan Amount shall accrue interest monthly at a rate of Ten (10%) percent per annum.  Interest shall be due and payable on the Payment Date.







Amounts advanced by Mr. Aruda up to June 30, 2016 are detailed below:








	
$  3,240.00

	
April 15, 2016

	
BF Borgers – accounting fees


	
$  1,500.00

	
April 28, 2016

	
Bank deposit


	
$     500.00

	
May 25, 2016

	
Bank deposit


	
$   5,240.00

	  	
Total












If suit is brought on this Note, or if it is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection, after any default in payment, the Borrower promises and agrees to pay all costs of collection, including lawyers’ fees, incurred thereby.







For value received, the Borrower waives presentment, demand, protest and notice of demand, protest and nonpayment and consents to any and all renewals and extensions of the time of payment hereof, binds himself to obligations under this Note as principals and not as sureties, and further agrees that at any time the terms of payment hereof may be modified or security released without affecting the liability of any part of this Note or any person liable or to become liable with respect to any indebtedness evidenced hereby.












/s/Edward Aruda







By: Edward Aruda


Vet Online Supply Inc.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPI RES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT TROY E. HALE, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D14-5494 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed September 18, 2015. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Lee County; Bruce E. Kyle, Judge.

KHOUZAM, Judge.
Troy Hale appeals the order denying his motion for jail credi t under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801. We affirm without prejudice to Hale's right to file a timely motion under rule 3.850. See Johnson v. State, 60 So. 3 d 1045, 1052 (Fla. 2011). We caution, however, that "[w]hen a criminal defendant seeks to withdraw a negotiated plea, or to attack it collaterally, if he is success ful he loses the benefit of the bargain he has elected to attack." Id. (quoting Moreland v. Sm ith, 664 So. 2d 1039, 1040 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)).-2- CRENSHAW and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
(Reap. Dec. 8646)

Entry No. 976.

#### Louis Goldey *v.*United States

(Decided September 14, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this appeal for reappraisement consists of tile imported and entered at the port of Baltimore, Md. The merchandise was entered at the invoiced unit prices, less 5 per centum discount, less inland freight as invoiced, packed. It was appraised at invoiced unit prices, less *5*per centum packed. The item in dispute is, therefore, the inland freight.

When the case was called for trial, the examiner who passed the merchandise was called to the stand and testified that, since making the return of value in this case, he had received additional information from abroad to the effect that such merchandise was freely offered for sale by the manufacturer at the invoiced unit prices, less 5 per centum, less 1 cent per square foot for inland freight charges to seaport, packed. Upon calculation, the latter figure is equivalent to the inland freight, as invoiced in the case at bar, and the value so arrived at was conceded by counsel for the Government to be the value at which the instant merchandise would now be appraised.

Judgment will, therefore, issue accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK VALENZUELA, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0900 FCD DAD P

vs.

C. SMITH, M.D., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Defendants have requested an extension of time to file pretrial motions. Good

cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ June 13, 2005 request for an extension of time is granted;

2. The deadline for filing pretrial motions other than discovery motions is

continued from June 17, 2005, to July 18, 2005; and

3. No other changes to the court’s December 27, 2004 scheduling order are

effected by this order.

DATED: June 16, 2005.

DAD:13:bb

vale0900.36ptm

Case 2:04-cv-00900-FCD-DAD Document 37 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                         GENESIS HEALTHCARE CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of Genesis HealthCare Corporation (the "Company") does hereby certify
with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date: February 13, 2004                    George V. Hager, Jr.
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           George V. Hager, Jr.
                                           Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Chairman of the Board


     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of
the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Order Granting Application to Modify Scheduling Order (2:04-cv-0878-GEB-DAD (PC))

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

C/O KISSINGER, et al.,

Defendants.

Case No. 2:04-cv-0878-GEB-DAD (PC)

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO 

MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER

Defendants filed a motion to modify the scheduling order to reset the trial date due to a 

conflict with another trial for defense counsel. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. The trial is 

continued to August 6, 2013, commencing at 9:00 a.m.

Date: 1/15/2013

 ___________________________________

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 231 Filed 01/16/13 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Order Granting Application to Modify Scheduling Order (2:04-cv-0878-GEB-DAD (PC))

DEAC_Signature-END:

61khh4bb

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 231 Filed 01/16/13 Page 2 of 2
#### COMMANDER AIRCRAFT COMPANY, Petitioner v. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, Respondent

No. 00-1261.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 23, 2001.

Before SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This petition for review of an order of the Federal Aviation Administration was considered on the briefs and appendix filed by the parties. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition for review be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner filed its petition for judicial review while a request for agency reconsideration was pending, and the petition was thus premature when filed. *See TeleSTAR, Inc. v. FCC,*888 F.2d 132, 133 (D.C.Cir.1989) (per curiam). The subsequent action by the Federal Aviation Administration in denying reconsideration on November 27, 2000, “does not ripen the petition for review or secure appellate jurisdiction.” *Id.*at 134. Petitioner may seek judicial review of that order as well as the underlying order within the time provided for by the relevant statute, 49 U.S.C. § 46110(a). *See Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. v. FERC,*9 F.3d 980, 981 (D.C.Cir.1993) (per curiam).

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4325 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 427
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4325

   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program 
       relating to lifespan respite care, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 14, 2024

  Ms. Collins (for herself and Ms. Baldwin) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

                             June 18, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Sanders, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program 
       relating to lifespan respite care, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lifespan Respite Care 
Reauthorization Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF LIFESPAN RESPITE CARE PROGRAM.

    (a) Definition of Family Caregiver.--Section 2901(5) of the Public 
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300ii(5)) is amended by striking ``unpaid 
adult'' and inserting ``unpaid individual''.
    (b) Funding.--Section 2905 of the Public Health Service Act (42 
U.S.C. 300ii-4) is amended by striking ``fiscal years 2020 through 
fiscal year 2024'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2025 through 2029''.
                                                       Calendar No. 427

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4325

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend the Public Health Service Act to reauthorize the program 
       relating to lifespan respite care, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 18, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED
HEREIN AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,704)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,221
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                18,889
<PP&E>                                           4,642
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,703
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,796
<BONDS>                                          4,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,658)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,199
<SALES>                                         58,604
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,604
<CGS>                                           37,476
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,476
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   296
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (833)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,738)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,738)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.58)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nexicon, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


Date:     February 10, 2006             NEXICON, INC.

                                        By:   /s/ Richard A. Urrea
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Richard A. Urrea
                                              President, Chief Executive Officer
                                              and Principal Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Nexicon, Inc. and will
be retained by Nexicon, Inc. and furnished to the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request.
MEMORANDUM

TO: Lisa Biddle, US EPA/OW/EAD

FROM: Meghan Camp, ERG

DATE: 18 July 2013

SUBJECT: Materials for the Mississippi Lime Production & Produced Water Congress 2013

On June 26th and 27th, ERG the Mississippi Lime Produced Water Conference in 

Oklahoma City, OK. The conference materials in the following table are provided as 

attachments:
Memorandum

18 July 2013

Page 2 of 2

2

Table 1. Mississippi Lime Produced Water 2013 Presentations Referenced in Summary

Reference Presentation File Name Presenter Name and Affiliation Presentation Title

Black, 2013

10-day-one-1100-galyn-blackchesapeake-energy.pdfGalyn Black, Chesapeake Energy Case Study: Design, Implementation and 

Operation of an Effective Water Transfer 

System in the Mississippi Lime

Colwell, 2013

8-day-one-0840-cecil-colwell.pdf Cecil Colwell, Source Energy Development of Cost-Effective Systems for 

Handling Produced Water

Dees, 2013

16-day-one-1335-john-dees-reederenergy.pdfJohn Dees, Reeder Energy Mississippi Lime Production & Produced 

Water Congress 2013 – Re-Using Produced 

Water

Dorn, 2013

15-day-one-1335-forest-dorniofina-resources-inc.pdfForrest Dorn, Iofina plc Re-Using Produced Water

Garwood, 2013

17-day-one-1510-dan-garwoodhighmount-eandp.pdfDan Garwood, HighMount E&P How Operators are Minimizing Costs 

Associated with Gathering and Transporting 

Produced Water from Wells to Disposal Plants

Harpham, 2013

41-day-one-830-stephen-harphamdorado-eandp.pdfStephen Harpham, Dorado E&P Partners Opening Remarks

Murray, 2013

9-day-one-0920-kyle-murrayoklahoma-geological-survey.pdfKyle Murray, Oklahoma Geological 

Survey

Examining Water Production Volumes and 

Produced Water Quality in the Mississippi 

Lime to Develop Appropriate Management 

Strategies

Smith, 2013

45-day-two-1450-daniel-smithpetro-river.pdfDaniel Smith, PetroRiver Oil Optimizing Pressure Drawdown to Improve Oil 

Recovery

Tipton, 2013

18-day-one-1635-steve-tiptionnewfield-exploration.pdfSteven Tipton, Newfield Exploration 

Company

Outlining Water Storage Options for 

Fracturing Operations to Highlight Economic 

Options

Unruh, 2013

24-day-one-1715-don-unruh-partone-sullivan-and-co.pdf

25-day-one-1715-don-unruh-parttwo-sullivan-and-co.pdf

Don Unruh, Sullivan and Co. Pinpointing Oil-Water Contact Zones to 

Identify the Higher Oil Cut, Lower Water 

Saturation Areas in the Mississippi Lime and 

Chat
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHANH KOUIYOTH,

Petitioner, No. 2:04-cv-00662-MCE-JFM (HC)

vs.

MATTHEW C. KRAMER, ORDER

Respondent. 

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has timely filed a notice of appeal of

this court’s October 29, 2009 order denying petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s

September 30, 2009 denial of his application for a writ of habeas corpus. By order filed February

10, 2010, the United States Court of Appeals remanded the matter to this court for the limited

purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed.

R. App. P. 22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only if the

applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of appealability indicating which issues

satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue. 

Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

Case 2:04-cv-00662-MCE -JFM Document 68 Filed 02/23/10 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Petitioner paid the $5.00 filing fee in this court on April 14, 2004. 1

2

For the reasons set forth in the magistrate judge’s September 2, 2009 findings and

recommendations, petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right in his habeas corpus petition. Accordingly, a certificate of appealability should not issue in

this action.

On December 29, 2009, petitioner filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis on appeal. Examination of the in forma pauperis affidavit reveals that petitioner is

1

unable to afford the filing fee for his appeal. Accordingly, the request for leave to proceed in

forma pauperis will be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

2. Petitioner’s December 29, 2009 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis

is granted.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this order to the United

States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Dated: February 22, 2010

________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00662-MCE -JFM Document 68 Filed 02/23/10 Page 2 of 2
No. 52975.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. and A. F. Sullivan Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 946072-G and 955635-G (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
# sec5

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2017-06	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2017
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Curative Health Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph
Feshbach, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                              /s/  Joseph Feshbach

                                   -----------------------------------------
                                   Joseph Feshbach
                                   Chief Executive Officer
                                   August 9, 2004
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED****PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.**
     In connection with the Quarterly Report of HayesLemmerz International, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, James A. Yost, VicePresident, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
     1. The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
     2. The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ JAMES A. YOST      James A. Yost     *Vice President,* *Finance and Chief Financial Officer*
September 8, 2004