alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6466
MICHAEL F. DEHONEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MICHAEL MOORE, SCDC Director; CHARLIE J. CEPAK, Warden; WILLIAM R. DAVIS, Warden, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District Judge. (CA-96-1356-4-21BE) Submitted: July 24, 1997 Decided: August 7, 1997 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael F. Dehoney, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Eric Petersen, LarryC. Batson, Sr., William Ansel Collins, Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Dehoney v. Moore , No. CA-96-1356-4-21BE (D.S.C. Feb. 24, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Business Reports: Deposit History by Status

To view a deposit history by status report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, click Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Business Reports, click Deposit History by Status. The Deposit History by Status

parameters page appears.

3. Enter your search criteria.

o Select the Organization, required

o Select the ALC (Agency Location Code)

o Select the Status, required

o Enter the From: and To: Status Date range

o Enter the From: and To: Deposit Total range

o Click Yes or No for Report With Children

• Click Yes for Report With Children to generate a report that contains data for the 

selected OTC Endpoint as well as all of the lower level OTC Endpoints. 

• Click No for Report With Children to generate a report that contains data only for 

the selected OTC Endpoint.

4. Click an OTC Endpoint to initiate the report. The Deposit History by Status preview page 

appears as shown in Figure 1.

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1: Deposit History by Status Preview Page

• TGA denotes a deposit processing OTC Endpoint.

• CHK denotes a check capture OTC Endpoint.

• M denotes a mapped accounting code; an open lock denotes access permission; 

and a closed lock denotes no access permission.

• CDC denotes card processing OTC Endpoint.

5. Under Export as, you have the following options:

o Select PDF, Excel or Word format

o Click Download

Or

o Click Print PDF Report

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• Deposits with a voucher date older than five years does not display on the report but 

they may be viewed from the Historical Reports page (Home>Reports>Historical 

Reports).

• Unconfirmed Foreign Check items entered with a Country of Deposit value of 

Other does not display values in the Voucher Amount column.

Click Previous to return to the previous page.

Application Tips

Additional Button
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SERGEI PORTNOY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1462 GEB JFM PS

vs.

WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. On May 20, 2005,

defendant’s motion to compel arbitration was granted and this action was stayed pending

arbitration. On December 14, 2005, plaintiff filed a document entitled “Motion for Further

Proceedings,” in which he asks the court to set a status conference in this action because the

arbitration concluded on November 21, 2005. 

Good cause appearing, plaintiff’s request will be granted. This matter will be set

for status conference on March 2, 2006. The Clerk of the Court will be directed to reopen this

action.

Pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 and Local Rule

16-240, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. A Status Conference is set for March 2, 2006, at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom # 26

before the undersigned.

Case 2:04-cv-01462-GEB -JFM Document 29 Filed 02/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. All parties shall appear by counsel or in person if acting without counsel.

3. Plaintiff and counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers

immediately of any settlement or other disposition (see Local Rule 16-160). In addition, the

parties are cautioned that pursuant to Local Rule 78-230(c), opposition to the granting of a

motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides

that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written

opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” Moreover, Local Rule 78-

230(j) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or

may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 11-110 provides that failure to comply with the

Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or

Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” 

DATED: February 9, 2006.

/001; portnoy.stat

Case 2:04-cv-01462-GEB -JFM Document 29 Filed 02/09/06 Page 2 of 2
Order entered December 3 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 15

- 01086

- CR

ADRIAN ROOSEVELT MCD ANIEL, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F14

- 57440

- H



### O RDER The reporter’s record is overdue in this appeal. We also note that the record does not contain the trial court’s certification of appellant’s right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a), (d); Cortez v. State , 42 0 S.W.3d 803 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to prepare and file a certification of appellant’s right to appeal that accurately reflects the trial court proceedings.

We further ORDER the trial court to make findings of fact re garding whether appellant has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any

other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect. If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed wi thout payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as m ay be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal.

 The trial court shall next determi ne: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order. The supplemental record shall also contain the trial court’s ce rtification of appellant’s right to appeal.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,
whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA B ROWN JUSTICE
( p pb) Chronic SARs SAR Class N ew Chemcial Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7643

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KENNETH RAY JOHNSON,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00316-LMB-1)

Submitted: March 29, 2018 Decided: April 3, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Ray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Gerard John Mene, Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Ray Johnson appeals the district court’s orders: authorizing the Bureau of 

Prisons to remit to the district court funds held in Johnson’s trust account as payment 

towards court-ordered restitution; and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 1:07-cr-00316-LMB-1 (E.D. 

Va. Oct. 27 & Dec. 6, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ISS GROUP, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          59,846
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,592
<ALLOWANCES>                                       258
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                67,857
<PP&E>                                           4,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,205
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  71,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,429
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    62,735
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,834
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,811
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (3,305)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,305)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,305)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.23)
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:04-cv-01702-DFL-PAN   Document 22    Filed 09/23/05   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-01702-DFL-PAN   Document 22    Filed 09/23/05   Page 2 of 2

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-28T00:27:26-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****POWRE, ProfessionalOpportunities for Women in Research and Education [electronic resource] : FY... program activities report.**
 
1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000
 
SuDoc Number:NS 1.61:
Item Number:0834-Z-01 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000521101
 
February 11, 2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-8283-4]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice; request for public comment.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with section 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement concerning the Star Lake Canal Superfund Site, with the Calabrian Corporation.

The settlement requires the settling parties to pay a total of $20,000 as payment of response costs to the Hazardous Substances Superfund. The settlement includes a covenant not to sue pursuant to section 107 of CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9607.

For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

# DATES:

Comments must be submitted on or before April 5, 2007.

# ADDRESSES:

The proposed settlement and additional background information relating to the settlement are available for public inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. A copy of the proposed settlement may be obtained from Lydia Johnson, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 665-8419. Comments should reference the Star Lake Canal Superfund Site, Jefferson County, Texas, and EPA Docket Number 06-03-07, and should be addressed to Lydia Johnson at the address listed above.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Edwin Quinones, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-8035.

Dated: February 9, 2007.

Lawrence E. Starfield,

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.

[FR Doc. E7-3881 Filed 3-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GENE PAUL WHEATON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1503 DFL DAD P

vs.

C. KING, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed August 15, 2005, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do

so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has

now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the

court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Case 2:04-cv-01503-DFL-DAD Document 5 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: September 28, 2005.

DAD:lg

whea1503.fta

Case 2:04-cv-01503-DFL-DAD Document 5 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Defendant’s Ex Parte Application for

Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Amended

Complaint

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND

TO PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED

COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CRAFT, ) Case No. S-04-0780 MCE KJM PS

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

)

JAMES G. ROCHE, Secretary of the United )

States Air Force, )

)

Defendant. )

__________________________________________)

For good cause shown, defendant’s ex parte application for extension of time to

respond to plaintiff's amended complaint, filed May 18, 2006, is hereby APPROVED. Defendant’s

deadline is extended to July 6, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: May 19, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00780-MCE -KJM Document 25 Filed 05/22/06 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600380

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

GARRETT S. MOUNTAIN

Corporal (E-4), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major Michael D. Zimmerman, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Headquarters and Support 

Battalion, Marine Corps Installations-West, Marine Corps Base, Camp 

Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel Todd 

Enge, USMC.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Ryan C. Mattina, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 13 April 2017

_________________________

Before MARKS, JONES, and Pettit, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

I, David D. Smith, ChiefFinancial Officer of Koss Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, that:

 

(i) the Annual Reporton Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(ii) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date: September 20,  2010 |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |   |
| /s/ David D. Smith             |   |
|                           |   |
| David D. Smith                 |   |
| Executive Vice President  and  |   |
| Chief Financial Officer        |   |

 

----
Order entered November 1, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00958-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF I.L.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-09-7655

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

On September 26, 2013, the Court ordered the trial court to conduct a hearing regarding 

appellant’s alleged errors and/or omissions from the reporter’s record. The trial court conducted 

a hearing and filed her findings and a reporter’s record from the hearing. The trial court found 

three errors in the record and a corrected reporter’s record has been filed with the Court.

Before the Court are the following motions filed by appellant: (1) September 23, 2013 

motion requesting copies of the original and supplemental records; and (2) October 17, 2013 

motion requesting that the Clerk of this Court serve all papers issued by the Court on five 

persons designated by appellant.

We GRANT appellant’s motion requesting copies of the records to the following extent:

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send appellant a paper copy of the following 

records:
1. clerk’s record filed on August 1, 2013;

2. supplemental clerk’s record filed on August 27, 2013;

3. supplemental clerk’s record filed on September 9, 2013;

4. volumes one through five of the reporter’s record filed on July 19, 2013; and

5. volume one of the supplemental reporter’s record of the final trial held on April 9, 

2013 that was filed with this Court on October 25, 2013.

With regard to appellant’s request for service of papers in this cause, we note that the 

Court is sending copies of correspondence to Annette Littleton, Scott Henson, and Shawn 

Williams. We DENY appellant’s motion with regard to D. Smith Sims & Associates, 

LLP and Monica Moorehead.

Appellant shall file his brief on or before DECEMBER 16, 2013.

/s/ DAVID LEWIS 

JUSTICE
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Ana Maria Lara v. Jose Sanchez

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 8

- 00 025

- CV

Trial court case number: 2016

- 19246

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Ana Maria Lara , ha s filed a notice of interlocutory appeal of the trial

court’s “Order Appointing Receiver for Cardenas Auto Sales,” signed on January 2,

2108. And, Lara has filed a n “ Emergency Motion to Stay the Appointment of Receiver

Pending Accelerated Appeal .” The motion is denied

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 15

, 2018