alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
                           SECTION 302 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles Stidham, certify that:

         1. I have  reviewed  this annual  report on form 10-KSB of The X-Change
Corporation, Inc.,

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in exchange act rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating  to the small  business  issuer,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
reasonably  likely to materially  affect,  the small business  issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business  issuer's other certifying  officers and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting,  to the small business  issuer's  auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small business  issuer's  internal
control over financial reporting.

Date: April 13, 2005
/S/ Charles Stidham
Charles Stidham
C.E.O., President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3835 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

DONALD HOMAN 

USM # 60073-066 

CRIMINAL NOS. 05-708 AND 07-689 

~Of(Rt;e~ ORDER 

AND NOW this 971(__ day of fl~ , 2016, pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines, and by agreement of the 

parties, it is hereby ORDERED that the term of imprisonment in this case is reduced to 125 

months, effective November 1, 2015. Any and all pending prose motions related to Amendment 

782 are moot and hereby DISMISSED. 

BY THE COURT: 

United States District Court Judge 

Case 2:05-cr-00708-CMR Document 69 Filed 03/09/16 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals,  Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I, Bernard Berk,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the consolidated financial condition of the Company
         as of the dates presented and the consolidated  result of operations of
         the Company for the periods presented.

                                    /s/ Bernard Berk

Date:      November 11, 2004        _____________________________________
                                    Bernard Berk
                                    Chief Executive Officer of
                                    Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.


This  certification  has been  furnished  solely  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Elite  Pharmaceuticals,   Inc.  and  will  be  retained  by  Elite
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
No. 54631.

#### Morris Kopit Co. *v.*United States,

protest 132735-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 21



                              List of Subsidiaries
                                      of
                    Furniture Brands International, Inc.


                                                       Jurisdiction of
          Name of Subsidiary                            Incorporation 
          ------------------                           ---------------

     Action Transport, Inc.                            Delaware

     Action Industries, Inc.                           Mississippi

     Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc.               North Carolina

     Broyhill Transport, Inc.                          North Carolina

     Fayette Enterprises, Inc.                         Mississippi

     Interco Receivables Corp.                         Delaware

     Lane Advertising, Inc.                            Virginia

     Lane Furniture Industries, Inc.                   Delaware

     The Lane Company, Incorporated                    Virginia

     Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.            Delaware

     Thomasville Furniture Latin America, S.A.         Panama
<PAGE>
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-1- WILKE,FLEURY, HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SACRAMENTO ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY (Case No. S-04-1358 WBS/GGH)

WILKE, FLEURY, HOFFELT, GOULD & BIRNEY, LLP 

WILLIAM A. GOULD, JR. (SBN 035446) 

DANIEL L. BAXTER (SBN 203862) 

400 Capitol Mall, Twenty-Second Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 441-2430 

Facsimile: (916) 442-6664 

Attorneys for All Defendants 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

JAMES P. DeFAZIO, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOLLISTER, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case No. S-04-1358 WBS/GGH 

(Consolidated Action Master File Number) 

ORDER RE MOTION FOR LEAVE FOR 

OUT-OF-TOWN COUNSEL TO APPEAR 

TELEPHONICALLY AT JULY 21, 2008 

HEARING 

KATHLEEN ELLIS, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

HOLLISTER, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

BRENDA DIMARO; and HALLIE 

LAVICK, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

HOLLISTER, INC., et al., 

 Defendants. 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 366 Filed 07/18/08 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

-2- WILKE,FLEURY, HOFFELT,

GOULD &BIRNEY,LLP 

ATTORNEYS AT LA W

SACRAMENTO ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY (Case No. S-04-1358 WBS/GGH)

Upon reviewing Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Amend the Complaint, Reconsider 

Dismissal of Herbert, McCormack and Karlovsky, and to Clarify April 8, 2008 Order, and the 

papers submitted in opposition thereto, the court has determined that the matters are appropriate 

for submission and decision without oral argument. Therefore the application of attorneys 

Michael B. Roche, James D. Adducci, and James W. Ducayet to appear telephonically at the 

hearing scheduled for July 21, 2008 at 2:00 p.m. is moot. 

DATED: July 17, 2008 

373143.1 

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH Document 366 Filed 07/18/08 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6985

HENRY LEWIS ASTROP,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRUNSWICK,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District

Judge. (3:06-cv-00640)

Submitted: September 26, 2007 Decided: October 18, 2007

Before WILKINSON and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Henry Lewis Astrop, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Henry Lewis Astrop appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Astrop v.

Brunswick, No. 3:06-cv-00640 (E.D. Va. Apr. 26, 2007 & May 21,

2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENJAMIN ADAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0694 DFL KJM P

vs.

TERESA SCHWARTZ, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00694-RRB -KJM Document 17 Filed 07/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 24, 2005 request

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: July 6, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/kf

adam0694.31

Case 2:04-cv-00694-RRB -KJM Document 17 Filed 07/07/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051828
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             MAR-26-1999
<CASH>                                             0
<SECURITIES>                             485,182,958
<RECEIVABLES>                              8,549,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         493,732,156
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           493,732,156
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      8,549,198
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                              412,372,000
<COMMON>                                  72,810,958
<OTHER-SE>                                         0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             493,732,156
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           8,596,995
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            8,596,995
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        8,596,995
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               8,596,995
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
        


</TABLE>
ONL)iiiiAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0460

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

DAVINA ATTAR-WILLIAMS,

Petitioner and Appellant,

and

STEVEN THOMAS WILLIAMS,

Respondent and Appellee.

FILED

MAR 2 3 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Petitioner and Appellant Davina Attar-Williams has moved for a stay of this appeal

pending the resolution of her request to disqualify Hon. Donald L. Harris, who presided over the

underlying matter in the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, Cause No. DR19-0893. Respondent and Appellee Steven Thomas Williams objects to Attar-Williams's motion.

This Court has denied Attar-Williams's request to disqualify Judge Harris. As such, the

grounds for her motion to stay this appeal are moot.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner and Appellant Davina Attar-Williams motion to stay this

appeal is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner and Appellant Davina Attar-Williams shall

prepare, file, and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than April 22, 2021. Failure to file

the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further

notice.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to Attar-Williams personally and to all

counsel of record.

DATED this073 day of March, 2021.

/A(-,4( ,—Aff

Chief Justice

03/23/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0460
Exhibit 4.71


 





 


January 31, 2008


 


BY PERSONAL DELIVERY


 


Ms. Alida Gualtieri


11026 Paris Street


Montréal-Nord, Québec 
H2H 4L1


 


Re:
Employment Agreement


 


Dear Alida:


 


Further
to our recent discussions, we hereby confirm that your employment agreement
with DRAXIS Health Inc. dated October 17, 2003 and amended on March 26,
2004 (the “Employment Agreement”) is hereby amended as follows:


 


·                  By
deleting Section 3 and replacing it with the following Section 3:


 


You
will be entitled to participate in all benefit plans which the DRAXIS Group
shall, from time to time make available to its executive employees, subject to
applicable eligibility rules thereof. 
The benefits currently offered are:


·                  major medical


·                  drug


·                  dental


·                  group life


·                  short and long term disability


·                  accidental death and dismemberment


 


You will also be entitled
to an amount of up to 5% of your Base Salary, which exact percentage shall be
determined from year to year in lieu of participation in DRAXIS’ Retirement
Savings Program. (the “DRSP Amount”)


 


·                  By
deleting Section 13(c) and replacing it with the following Section 13(c):


 


(c)                                  Termination
by DRAXIS Without Serious Reason and Without Notice


 


DRAXIS may
terminate this Agreement and your employment hereunder, in its sole discretion,
Without Notice and Without Serious Reason, effective immediately upon the date
you are advised of the termination (the “Date of Termination”)


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


DRAXIS
HEALTH  INC. / SANTÉ DRAXIS INC.


16751 Route Trans Canada Highway, Kirkland, Québec, Canada H9H 4J4  Tel: (514) 694-8220 Fax: (514) 694-8201
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of K.R.G., Jr., a child

, * From the 326 th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 7719

- CX

.

No. 11

- 16

- 00025

- CV * July 20, 2016

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Bailey, J. , and Countiss, sitting by

assignment )

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Christopher J. Zyda, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Luminent MortgageCapital, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonable likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controls over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 9, 2004   By: /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZYDA  Christopher J. Zyda Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, March 14, 2007--6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pat Halsey, Federal Coordinator, 
Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, 
Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone: (865) 576-4025; Fax: (865) 576-5333 or e-
mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c5ada4a9b6a0bcb5af85aab7aaeba1aaa0eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e767f726d7b676e745e716c71307a717b30797168">[email protected]</span></a> or check the Web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE in the areas of environmental restoration, waste 
management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The main presentation topic will be ``Balance of 
Reservation Program and the Integrated Facility Disposition Project.''
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Pat Halsey at the address or telephone 
number listed above. Requests must be received five days prior to the 
meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include the 
presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer is 
empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate the 
orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public comment 
will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their comments.
    Minutes: Minutes of this meeting will be available for public 
review and copying at the Department of Energy's Information Center at 
475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, TN between 8 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday 
through Friday, or by writing to Pat Halsey, Department of Energy Oak 
Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, or 
by calling her at (865) 576-4025.

    Issued at Washington, DC on February 23, 2007.
Rachel M. Samuel,
Deputy Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-3503 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>