alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRI CT OF CO L UM BIA District Department of the E nvironment 

# ***
A ir Quality Divi s ion MEMORANDUM TO: Tommy



# Wells **~** Director , District bepartment of the Env ironment FROM: Ccc il y Beall



# 0J./~\ **o.** \\cf Associate Dir ec tor , Air Qualit y Div isio n , DDO E DATE: Jun c5 , 20 15 SU BJ ECT : Hearing Officer's Certification for the Public Hearing on the Second Proposed Rulemaking to Regulate the Inter s tate Transport of Nitrogen Oxides (N O t) Emissions from Non-Electric Generating U nit (EGU) Sources and Propo se d Revision of the District 's tat e Implement atio n Plan (SIP)
Thi s is to certif y that a public bearing was held at appro ximatel y 5: 00p
. m . on January 5 , 2015, to g i ve the public th e opportun ity to comment on the Di strict 's s econd pro pos ed rulemaking to regulate the inters tate transport of nitrogen oxide s from the Di stri c t 's onl y non-electric g e neratin g un it app li cable und er the 

### NO x S IP Call. Once final , the rul emaking will be submitted to the U .S. En v ironme ntal Protectio n Agency (E P A ) a s a SIP revi s ion
. Notice of the public hearin g wa s po s ted in the 

### D .C. Register on November 2 l , 20 14 (61 DCR 012013 , Notice ID 5 19 1 069 ) , and o n DDOE ' s website. Cec il y Beall of th e District D epartment of the Environment , Air Quality Division , repres en ted the Distri ct. No o n e atte nd ed the publi c hearing .

DISTR ICt D EPARTMI:N I or Ti l [ ENVIRONMENT w · eenforward
12 00 Firs t St. NE, 5th F loor , Washin g ton , D C 2 000 21 t e l : 2 0 2
. 535.2 600 

### I web: ddoe.dc.gov 

# * * * Wrt ARrt WASI · HNGTO N 

# oc
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES BRITTINGHAM,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0037 LKK DAD P

vs.

HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

By order filed October 26, 2005, plaintiff was instructed to file and serve a status

report within thirty days. Plaintiff has filed a document titled “Response to Status Report.” The

document was not served on defendant Sandham. Plaintiff states that he submitted documents to

prison staff for photocopying in accordance with a new institutional policy and that all of his

documents were lost or destroyed. Plaintiff alleges that the loss or destruction was intentional

and that his “whole case is lost.” Citing the institution’s mishandling of his documents, plaintiff

claims he cannot comply with the rule requiring him to serve his status report on defendant’s

counsel. Plaintiff asks the court to serve the document on his behalf.

Plaintiff’s request for service by the court will be denied. Plaintiff will be granted

thirty days to file and serve an amended status report. The amended status report shall not

contain any matter other than plaintiff’s responses to the topics listed in the Order Requiring

Case 2:04-cv-00037-LKK -DAD Document 51 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The Order Requiring Status Report does not instruct plaintiff to submit copies of

exhibits or other documents with his status report, and no documents should be attached to

plaintiff’s amended status report. It appears that most of plaintiff’s lost documents are copies of

documents maintained in his prison central and medical files. Plaintiff has not shown that he will

be unable to obtain duplicates.

2

Status Report.1 Any other matter must be presented in a separate document that is appropriately

titled and properly supported. If plaintiff declines to follow institutional procedures for obtaining

copies of his amended status report, he must make identical handwritten copies for mailing to the

court and to defendant’s Sandham’s counsel. Plaintiff is cautioned that all subsequent

documents submitted to the court for filing must be served on defendant’s counsel and must

include proof of such service. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5; Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s November 21, 2005 request for service by the court is denied.

2. Plaintiff’s amended status report shall be filed and served within thirty days

from the date of this order. Defendant Sandham’s status report shall be filed and served within

thirty days after plaintiff’s amended status report is served. Any party’s failure to file a status

report in accordance with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions.

DATED: November 30, 2005.

DAD:13:bb

brit0037.35a

Case 2:04-cv-00037-LKK -DAD Document 51 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 9474)

#### Finwood Industries, Inc. Samuel S*h*apiro *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4291.

(Decided June 23, 1959)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain plywood exported from Finland in the year 1956, and entered at the port of Baltimore, Md.

In a written stipulation of submission, the parties have limited the case to the items of merchandise that were “advanced in value and appraised on the basis of home market value.” The agreed facts, upon which the case is before me, establish that the proper basis for ap-praisement of the said merchandise is foreign value, as defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and that such statutory value therefor is the appraised unit values, less 4 per centum, packed, and I so hold.

The appeal for reappraisement, having been abandoned as to the items of merchandise which were appraised “on the basis of the entered invoice unit values” is dismissed as to that merchandise.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1


            Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer


The undersigned, Chairman, President and Treasurer, of Jaco Electronics, Inc.
(the "Company"), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge, that: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended June 30, 2005 (the "Annual Report") accompanying this certification fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) the information contained in the
Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
presented as required by such report. The foregoing certification is based upon,
among other things, my responsibilities as principal executive officer of the
Company, my own due diligence and representations made by certain other members
of the Company's senior management.

Date:  September 28, 2005

                             /s/ Joel H. Girsky
                                --------------------------
                                 Joel H. Girsky
                                 Chairman, President and Treasurer
                                (Principal Executive Officer)


<PAGE>
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Intra-Governmental Payment and Collection
- Metric Resources
- IPAC Stats for July 2020

# IPAC Transaction Count July 2020

Table may scroll on smaller screens 

Last modified 08/06/20
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Walter Maurice Savage,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-1079 MCE PAN P

vs. Order

State of California, et al.,

Respondents.

-oOoRespondent moved June 17, 2005, to dismiss the petition as

time-barred and plaintiff has not opposed. 

August 22, 2005, petitioner requested an order granting

access to the law library or legal assistance. Prisoners have a

federal constitutional right of access to the courts to attack

their sentences, directly or collaterally, and to challenge the

conditions of their confinement. Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343

(1996). However, Lewis v. Casey does not guarantee access to a 

///

Case 2:04-cv-01079-MCE -PAN Document 20 Filed 11/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

prison law library or legal assistance to oppose a motion to

dismiss a petition for habeas corpus. 

Petitioner’s August 22, 2005, request for access to the law

library or legal assistance is denied. 

The court grants petitioner a final extension to oppose the

motion to dismiss. He may file and serve an opposition on or

before November 30, 2005. 

So ordered.

Dated: November 17, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01079-MCE -PAN Document 20 Filed 11/18/05 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:
    
    /s/ CHRISTOPHER J. ZYDAChristopher J. ZydaSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                         WARNING MODEL MANAGEMENT, INC.
                           (F/K/A FAMOUS FIXINS, INC.)
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warning Model  Management,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10QSB/A for the period  ending  September  30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Stanley Tepper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




                                                /s/ Stanley Tepper
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Stanley Tepper
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                November 24, 2003
No. 64857.

#### Reliance Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33417 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To: Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Charlotte Bertrand/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 07/26/2010 09:37 AM

Subject: RE: Portland Cement Supplemental Documents requested

Hi Keith,

Thank you for sending the of the ISIS model and the Engineering Analysis and Economic Impacts

Analysis. I’d like to request the following document as well:

‐ Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document: NESHAP from the Portland Cement

Manufacturing Industry (RIA, p. 5

‐ 1)

I’ve consolidated the list of documents we’ve asked for so far in one place

– do you know when they will

be ready?

‐ Summary of Public Comments and Response document (p. 13)

‐ “Review of Environmental Justice Impacts”, June 2010 (p. 303)

‐ Floor Calculations for Final Portland Cement NESHAP (p. 33)

‐ Summary of Organic HAP Test Data (p. 57)

‐ And if this has been updated, the Summary of Environmental and Cost Impacts of Proposed

Revisions to Portland Cement National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

ORDER

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

MONICA N. ANDERSON

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DANIEL P. O’DONNELL, State Bar No. 177872

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-5810

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Carey, Cervantes, Cheung,

McIntyre, and Traquina

SA2004104569

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 SACRAMENTO DIVISION

RONALD DWANE BROOK,

Plaintiff,

v.

TOM L. CAREY, WARDEN, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CIV-S-04-1254 GEB GGH P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

REQUEST FOR AND EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE THEIR MOTION TO

DISMISS

This Court has considered Defendants’ request for an extension of time, and good

cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time for filing of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

in this case is extended 30 days, to and including December 4, 2005. No further extension of

time will be granted.

DATED: 11/8/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

broo1254.po

Case 2:04-cv-01254-GGH Document 57 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 1
# Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH Working Group: Meeting and Webinar 871840009 Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) Jun 10, 2013 09:28 AM EDT 512 Total Attended 37 

# Session Details

First Name Last Name Email CountryAddress City StateOrganization Zip Code Rodney Beever US 491 E. Princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403 brice Bowley US Appliance Park Louisville KY GE 40225 Brian Buynacek US 138 Ashwood Ln Orchard Park NY Emerson 14127 d cohen US 1000 Independence Washington DC DOE 20585 Bruce HELFT US 1516 Ninth Street Sacramento CA Energy Commission 95814 Larry Howington US 1925 Ruffin Mill Road Colonial Heights VA AHRI 23834 brian jeanes US 908 HWY 15 North New Albany MSMaster-Bilt Products 38652 Stephen Kowalski US 2701 Wilma Rudolph Blvd.Clarksville TN Ingersoll Rand - Trane North America 37040 Ping Kumpanon US 6655 W Sahara Ave Las Vegas NV DNVKEMA 89146 Bill Larson US 891 county road U Hudson WI Norlake, Inc. 54016 Stacey Maloney US 6 Campus Dr., 1st Fl. N. Parsippany NJ Hydraulic institute 07054-4406 John Mandyck US 1 Carrier Place Farmington CT UTC 06032 John McLaughlin US John.Mclaughlin@daikinmcqua y.com Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021 David Mecadon US 539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem PA National Refrigeration and Air Conditioning 19020 Mark Menzer US 11112 chessington pl Reston VA Intertek 20194 John Morris US 539 Dunksferry rd Bensalem PA Continental Refrigerator 19020 charity njau US 770 garrison ave bronx NY Felix Storch Inc 10474 Elizabeth Noll US 400 North Capitol Street NWWashington DCAmerican Gas Association20001 Kenny Owen US 908 hwy 15 N New Albany MSMaster-Bilt 38652 Kent Peterson US 5000 East Spring St Long Beach CA P2S Engineering, Inc. 90815 David Ransom US 500 N. Capitol Street, NWWashington DCMcDermott Will and Emery20155

wes Roan US 1914 Randolph Drive Bryan OHBard Manufacturing Co., Inc.43506 

# General InformationCarl Roberts US 1401 Grandview Av Oconomowoc WI Zero Zone 53066 Joe Sanders US 4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106 Jason Sands US One Delfield Drive Covington TN The Delfield Company 38019 Rafik Sarhadian US 6060 N. Irwindale Ave, Suite PIrwindale CASouthern California Edison91702 Stephen Schaefer US 618 Hwy 74 South Peachtree City GAhoshizaki america 30265 Louis Starr US 421 sw 6th Portland ORNEEA 97204 Anwar Suharno US 5540 Ketch Road Prince Frederick MDRoyston LLC 20678 Knute Svenson US 1200 19th St NW Washington DCNavigant 20036 Elizabeth Tate US 201 Massachusetts Ave Washington DCAmerican Public Gas Assoc22301 Eric Truskoski US 200 Lafayette St. Middleville MI Bradford White Corporation49333 Tom Walsh US 4900 Technology Park BlvdAuburn NYdaikin mcquay 13021 kevin washington US 1250 conn ave nw washington DCitw 20036 linda wilson US 120 Broadway NY NY NYSOAG 10271 Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500Arlington VA AHRI 22201 Yanda Zhang US 11211 Gold Country Blvd, suite 103 Gold River CATRC 95670
Stimulation Plan for FutureGen Alliance 

Permit Number: IL-137-6A-0004 (Well #4) Page I1of 1

ATTACHMENT I: STIMULATION PROGRAM 

Facility Name: FutureGen 2.0 Morgan County CO2 Storage Site 

IL-137-6A-0004 (Well #4) 

Facility Contacts: Kenneth Humphreys, Chief Executive Officer, 

FutureGen Industrial Alliance, Inc., Morgan County Office, 

73 Central Park Plaza East, Jacksonville, IL 62650, 217-243-8215 

Location of Injection Well: Morgan County, IL; 26−16N−9W; 39.80111oN and 90.07544oW 

The need for stimulation to enhance the injectivity potential of the Mount Simon Sandstone is not 

anticipated at this time. The need for stimulation will be determined once the characterization data from 

the CO2 injection wells are available and have been evaluated (i.e., results of geophysical logs, core 

analyses, hydrogeologic testing). If it is determined that stimulation techniques are needed, a stimulation 

plan will be developed and submitted to EPA Region 5 for review and approval prior to conducting any 

stimulation.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 6 committee of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted in Mesa, Arizona. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (TAP) is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. The TAP will use citizen input to make recommendations to the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, March 29, 2007, Friday, March 30, 2007 and Saturday, March 31, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dave Coffman at 1-888-912-1227, or 206-220-6096. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Thursday, March 29, 2007 from 1 p.m. Mountain Standard Time to 2:30 p.m. Mountain Standard Time; Friday, March 30, 2007 from 8:30 a.m. Mountain Standard Time to 5 p.m. Mountain Standard Time; and Saturday, March 31, 2007 from 8:30 a.m. Mountain Standard Time to 11:30 a.m. Mountain Standard Time at 200 North Centennial Way, Mesa, Arizona. The public is invited to make oral comments. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096, or write to Dave Coffman, TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or you can contact us at                     *http://www.improveirs.org*. Due to limited space, notification of intent to participate in the meeting must be made with Dave Coffman. Mr. Coffman can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6096.                 

                    The agenda will include the following:                     *Various IRS issues*.                 

Dated: February 27, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E7-3731 Filed 3-2-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAFAR AFSHAR,

NO. CIV. S-04-1088 LKK/JFM

Plaintiff,

v.

O R D E R

CITY OF SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO

POLICE DEPARTMENT; COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO; SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT; and SHERIFF

LOU BLANAS, individually and in his

official capacity as Sheriff of the

Sacramento County Sheriff’s Department,

Defendants.

 /

The court is in receipt of motions for summary judgement from

the Sacramento City and County defendants. The court is also in

receipt of plaintiff’s opposition to the motions for summary

judgement and plaintiff’s motion to amend the scheduling order and

complaint. Plaintiff seeks to amend the complaint by deleting as

parties defendants the City of Sacramento and the Sacramento Police

Department and adding an individual, Deputy Sheriff Spaid, who

allegedly initiated the excessive use of force. By virtue of the

Case 2:04-cv-01088-LKK -JFM Document 76 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

proposed first amended complaint, it is clear that plaintiff no

longer seeks to impose liability on the City of Sacramento and the

Sacramento City Police Department. Therefore, the City defendants

are dismissed and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment

accordingly. 

With respect to the County defendants, the County is directed

to file an opposition to the motion to amend the scheduling order

and complaint by 4:30 p.m. on Wednesday, November 2, 2005. 

Plaintiff’s reply brief, if any, shall be filed not later than 4:30

p.m. on Monday, November 7, 2005. Thereafter, the matter will

stand submitted without oral argument. 

Ruling on the County defendants’ motion for summary judgement

is deferred pending resolution of the motion to amend. The hearing

originally scheduled for November 7, 2005 is vacated. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: October 27, 2005.

 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-01088-LKK -JFM Document 76 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HAROLD LEE BRITTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0472 LKK GGH P

vs.

JEANNE S. WOODFORD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file and serve objections to the

February 2, 2006 findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's February 24, 2006 application for an extension of time is granted; 

2. Plaintiff is granted until March 12, 2006 in which to file and serve objections

to the February 2, 2006 findings and recommendations; and

3. Due court calendar requirements, no further extension can be granted.

DATED: 3/1/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009/mp

brit0472.36 

Case 2:04-cv-00472-LKK-GGH Document 45 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 1