alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
Exhibit 99.1


                                                             Contact: Brock Hill
                                                                  (626) 535-1932

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
----------------------

                COAST LITIGATION TRUST ANNOUNCES PARTICIPATION
                IN COURT ORDERED ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
                                        
       PASADENA, Calif., July 29, 1998 - The Coast Federal Litigation Contingent
Payment Rights Trust (NASDAQ:CCPRZ) reported today that, in response to the
government's request, the Trust has instructed counsel for the plaintiff in
Coast Federal Bank, Federal Savings Bank v. The United States (Civil Action No.
92-466C in the United States Court of Federal Claims) to participate in the
alternative dispute resolution process (the "ADR Process") established by Court
of Federal Claims Chief Judge Loren A. Smith in his order dated March 3, 1998
with respect to all Winstar related cases against the United States government.
Pursuant to the order, dated July 7, 1998, of Judge Lawrence S. Margolis, the
Claims Court judge appointed to implement the ADR Process, the plaintiffs in the
Coast case and two other Winstar related cases are to submit statements of their
claims for damages for consideration by the government and the Claims Court, the
government's responses are to be submitted to the respective plaintiffs and the
Claims Court, and the respective parties are then required to meet with the
Claims Court on October 8, 1998 to discuss whether any possibility of settling
the respective lawsuits exists. While the Trust anticipates a good faith
settlement effort by all parties, in light of the magnitude of the damages in
Coast's case and the complexities of the issues involved, the Trust believes
that reaching a settlement of the Coast litigation would be difficult.

       The Trust anticipates that future filings in connection with the ADR
Process, including the statements setting forth the plaintiffs' preliminary
claims for damages in their respective cases, will be filed with the Court of
Federal Claims under the seal of the Court and will therefore not be publicly
available.

       The Trust, established as part of the transaction pursuant to which Coast
Savings Financial, Inc., merged with and into H.F. Ahmanson & Co., holds
Ahmanson's commitment to pay the Trust the net after-tax proceeds, if any,
received by Coast Federal, or its successor, in the litigation. Certificates
representing undivided interests in the assets of the Trust, and therefore
interests in Ahmanson's commitment, were publicly issued by the Trust to the
holders of Coast Savings' common stock immediately prior to the effectiveness of
Coast Savings' merger with Ahmanson on February 13, 1998, which certificates
trade on The NASDAQ National Market under the symbol CCPRZ.##
Case 2:05-cv-04442-JF Document 27 Filed 09/20/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 53989.

#### Hide Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 136990-K (New York).

Ekwall, Judge:

This case relates to the dutiable classification of what is described on the invoice as uncombed rabbit hair imported from Holland. Duty was assessed thereon under the provision for waste, at 7)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1555 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by trade agreements with Canada, the United Kingdom, and Mexico, respectively. (T. D. 49752, T. D. 49753, and T. D. 50797.) It is claimed to be free of duty under paragraph 1688 of the same law which provides free entry for “Hair of horse, cattle, and other animals, cleaned or uncleaned, drawn or undrawn, but unmanufac-tured, not specially provided for.” By timely amendment an additional claim is made for free entry under paragraph 1681 of the same act, as modified, which covers furs and fur skins, not specially provided for, undressed.

Counsel have submitted the case upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the items marked “A” and checked FAS (Examiner’s initials) by Examiner F. A. Stubbe (Examiner’s name) on the invoices covered by the protest noted above, and assessed with duty at 7)4% under paragraph 1555 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with United Kingdom (T. D. 49753), consist of rabbit hair similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *W. Fein & Sons*v. *United States,*Abstract 53024, wherein the merchandise was held to be free of duty under paragraph 1681 of the Tariff Act of 1930.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED between the parties hereto, that the record in Abstract 53024 be incorporated and made a part of the record in the protest enumerated above, and that the protest be deemed submitted on this stipulation; the protest being limited to the items marked with the letter “A” as aforesaid.

Plaintiff waives the right to first docket call and further amendment of this protest.

In the case cited, the merchandise was assessed at 27)4 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1520 of the same act, as modified by the Belgian Trade Agreement (T. D. 47600), as “Hatters’ furs, or furs not on the skin, prepared for hatters’ use, including fur skins carroted.” The claims there presented by the protest were the same as in the case at bar. The question of the applicability of paragraph 1555, *supra,*was not raised or passed upon in that case. Moreover, the collector’s letter of transmittal in the decided case admitted error. The collector’s letter here involved states that no reason was found to modify the classification as waste, not specially provided for. The decision cited is not controlling of the issue here presented, i. e., whether the merchandise is properly dutiable as waste, or free of duty under the provisions of the statute cited.

Judgment will be rendered for the defendant.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDDIE J. JONES,

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT,

Defendant.

_____________________________/

CIV. S-04-0792-GEB-PAN-PS

ORDER

This matter was referred to the Honorable Peter A.

Nowinski, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§§ 636, et seq., and Local Rule 72-302. On May 23, 2005, Judge

Nowinski recommended that defendant’s motion to dismiss be

granted. No objections to the findings and recommendation have

been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

////

Case 2:04-cv-00792-GEB-PAN Document 14 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed May 23,

2005, are adopted in full; and 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.

Dated: June 30, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00792-GEB-PAN Document 14 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Request Your OTCnet Access in SailPoint IIQ

To request access for yourself in SailPoint IIQ, complete the following steps:

1. From the Home screen of SailPoint, navigate to Manage My Access through the Manage 

MyAccess button as shown in Figure 1. 

Figure 1. SailPoint Home Page with Manage My Access Button 

2. On the Manage My Access screen, ensure that Add Access tab is selected as shown in 

Figure 2. 

Search for the specific HLO name (e.g., Alaska USA Federal Credit Union) and user 

role (e.g., Check Capture Operator). If the HLO or user role’s name is not known, type 

HLO/Role in the search field.

3. Search for an HLO. Select an HLO by clicking the checkmark to the left of the HLO’s

name.

4. Continue on the same screen to search for a user role. Select a role by clicking the 

checkmark to the left of the role’s name. Then select Next.

• Multiple HLOs and roles can be selected.

• All roles selected in SailPoint IIQ will be validated (and edited as needed) in OTCnet 

by the designated PLSA/LSA.

Application Tips

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 2. Add Access Screen 

5. On the Review and Submit screen, verify the requested HLOs and role(s) are correct.

Select the voice bubble to the right of the HLO or role to add any comments. 

6. Select the Submit button at the bottom when finished, as shown in Figure 3. 

Figure 3. Review and Submit Screen 

7. A confirmation message will appear. SailPoint IIQ will automatically notify the necessary 

approvers to review the request. Once approved, your PLSA/LSA can create your identity in 

OTCnet and assign endpoints and roles for you.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• You will receive an autogenerated email when your user account is created in 

OTCnet.

• Then you can access the OTCnet application. 

Application Tips
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Stephen K.Gartside, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of EvolvingSystems, Inc.
| /s/ STEPHEN K. GARTSIDE, JR.          |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen K. Gartside, Jr.         |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 14, 2006                       |

 

This certification is furnished with this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed bythe Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to beincorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, asamended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Companyspecifically incorporates it by reference.

----
#### David Lee ALEXANDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-16584.

D.C. No. CV-98-01282-LDG.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 21, 2001.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

David Lee Alexander, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of his claims under 28 U.S.C. § 2671, the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal, *Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.,*143 F.3d 1293, 1295 (9th Cir.1998) (failure to state a claim); *Ma v. Reno,*114 F.3d 128, 130 (9th Cir.1997) (lack of subject matter), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Alexander’s FTCA claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. *See Brady v. United States,*211 F.3d 499, 502 (9th Cir.2000), *cert. denied,*531 U.S. 1037, 121 S.Ct. 627, 148 L.Ed.2d 536 (2000) (stating that a claimant under the Federal Tort *556Claims Act must comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2675(a) before a district court can exert jurisdiction over the claim). Thus, the district court properly dismissed Alexander’s claim for failure to state a claim. *See*Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6).

The district court properly construed Alexander’s complaint as asserting a *Bivens*claim. *See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,*403 U.S. 388, 396-97, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971) (recognizing constitutional claims can be brought against federal officials acting under color of federal law).

The district court properly dismissed the *Bivens*claim as time barred. *See*Nev. Rev. Stat § 11.190(4)(e); *W. Ctr. for Journalism v. Cederquist,*235 F.3d 1153, 1156 (9th Cir.2000) (per curiam).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
## SERVED: JANUARY 31, 2013

0 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THEMATTER OF 

### AERO MICRONESIA FAADOCKETNO. [TO BEASSIGNED]. (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012

- 0468
IN THE MATTER OF 

### AERO MICRONESIA

.FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0469


### ORDERCONTINUING CASE 

## Ziill FED**~** 

### l 

# r) 1: 30

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Complainant, filed a Motion for Continuance dated January 18., 2013. Complainant represents Aero Micronesia, Respondent, has no objection. WHEREFORE, the Motion for Continuance having been read and considered, the hearing currently scheduled for 

### April17, 18 and 

### 19, 2013, inclusive, in the U.S. District Court, District ofHawaii, be and is hereby continued to a date after May 17, 2013.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service List
1

### SERVICE LIST 0 

### ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1



### Michael R. 

### Quinn, President Aero Micronesia, Inc., dba Pacific Airlines

### Respondent 156 Diablo Road, Suite 203 Danville, CA94526 TEL: 925-362-4430 FAX: 925-362-4432 DonBobertz, 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofRegional Counsel Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.4 Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-3454 FAX: 310-725-6816 

### ONE COPY FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0468 & 

### FAA-2012-0469 (Civil Penalty Action)

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,

### AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service inperson orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### 2
No. 65487.

#### Albert Kessler *&*Co. and Arthur J. Fritz et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/31551, etc. (San Francisco).

*434Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal stoves similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63217, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
.IED STq T

~

S 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Q WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

y ~11t/► z 

FylqC 0 PROt~G~~ 

JUN 2 0 2011 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

J. R. Stroble 

Director, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

This is in response to your June 16, 2011, request for the Environmental Protection 

Agency's (EPA's) concurrence with the Department of Energy's (DOE) draft expansion 

certification letter to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) characterizing transuranic 

(TRU) waste at the Savannah River Site (SRS). Your request is in accordance with the Carlsbad 

Field Office (CBFO) procedures that are intended to ensure that DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot 

Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate appropriately with EPA approvals for waste 

characterization activities at DOE TRU waste generator sites. We concur that DOE's latest draft 

expansion certification letter comports with all of EPA's existing approvals for CH TR[1 waste 

(debris, soils, and solids) and RH TRU waste (debris and solids) at SRS. 

The purpose of this draft expanded certification is to add a new methodology for 

calibrating the Nondestructive Assay Box Counter (approved by EPA on May 31, 201 l) and 

adding a drum of RH waste generated at Battelle Columbus Laboratory (BCL), characterized by 

CCP at SRS (approved by EPA June 8, 2011). EPA has also received and reviewed quarterly 

tiering reports covering Tier 2 changes to the waste characterization program implemented by 

CCP at SRS and have found all changes made to be acceptable. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft expanded certification 

memo for SRS-CCP. If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 202-343-9422. 

Sincerely, 

Edward Feltcorn 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Intemet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable 0 Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Court Fesmire, CBFO 

Dennis Miehls, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO 

Donna Sellmer, CTAC
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HOLMES PRODUCTS CORP. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                       730
<INVENTORY>                                     61,856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               103,586
<PP&E>                                          38,217
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,245
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,335
<BONDS>                                        136,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,201
<OTHER-SE>                                    (37,013)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   136,245
<SALES>                                         91,238
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,238
<CGS>                                           67,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,124<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   271
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,926)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (424)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Product development expenses.
<F2>The Company's shares are not publicly traded.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IIIBy:
    /s/  MARLENE DEBELName:
    Marlene Debel*Title:
    Regular Trustee  
 *
    
    Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Trust for purposes of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
p. 1


# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 124 ) ll-E-8 4 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:07

AM Sheet 124 of 264P. 2 

### htB-aj-8 7 TH

U 10:5 1 DIAMON

D FIBERGLAS

S 02/20/9 7 11:1 9 Q1919941023 4 

### FA X NO . 512573045 1 PB S RI P NC 

### P . 01/0 1 (2002/00 2 

### A 945 2 

## II.-E-5 7

From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tReport Plasti c Composite s NESHA P Gre g LaFlam , Pacific Environmenta

l Services , Inc . (PES ) Novembe r 4,199 6 Mr . Gen e Bcnker , Presiden t Diamon d Fiberglas

s Fabricators , Victoria, T

X Telephon e Number * (512 ) 572-404 0
Contac tSummary : Aske d Diamon

d Fiberglass whethe

r th e referenc e i n thei r screenin g surve y respons e t o "interna l mi x systems " for thei r chop-hoo p winde r an d choppe r gun s indicate d tha tthey us e a

n enclose d mixin g proces s for their resi n matrix . Mr . Benkc r sai d tha tth e facilit

y doe s no td o an

y mixin g o f filler int o th e resin , althoug

h smal l amount s o f additive s ma y b e used . The described mi x system s ar

e use d to mi

x catalys tint o th e resi n a s th e resi n passes throug

h th e spra y gun .

REPOR T I S ACCURAT

E 

# £* &~JL
About this capture
Internet Archive
Wayback Machine
International News Crawls
No. 61340.

protest 232083-K (New York).

#### Julien Giguet, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of veils or veilings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Elvic Import Corp.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1837), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
FILED 

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 May 9, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-15927 

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 04-20366-CR-JAL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS OSPINA,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(May 9, 2005)

Before CARNES, MARCUS and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

David J. Joffe, retained counsel for Luis Ospina in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
2

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18

L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that

counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Ospina’s conviction and

sentence are AFFIRMED.