alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Memo of Understanding



 Exhibit 10.1 
 MEMO OF UNDERSTANDING 
 The purpose of this memorandum is to outline the basis of the work and compensation that will
be performed by Lawrence A. Collett (Chairman) after he retires as Chief Executive Officer and assumes the role of Chairman of the Board of, and consultant to, Cass Information Systems, Inc. 
  

	 	I.	Role and Responsibilities 

 The Chairman’s duties
shall be as set forth in the description attached to this memorandum. 
  

	 	II.	Time Commitments 

 It is expected that the Chairman will
spend not more than one day per week engaged in the above duties or activities as requested by the Company. 
 This new position will begin
July 20, 2008. 
 It is understood that this position will be for an initial three-year period, but can be extended upon the mutual
agreement of the Chairman and the Board of Directors. It is recognized this understanding can be terminated at any time by either party. 
  

	 	III.	Compensation 

  

	 	A.	Annual Fee – For serving in the outlined capacity, the Chairman shall receive a fee of $150,000 per year, paid monthly. 

  

	 	B.	The Chairman shall also receive the annual stock compensation and the monthly Board of Directors retainer and monthly meeting fees. In addition he will receive fees for each loan
committee meeting he attends as a member of that committee. He shall not receive a fee as an ex-officio member of other board committees. 

  

	 	C.	He will be reimbursed for business-related expenses including but not limited to, country club membership and automobile expenses at a level equivalent to that provided during
employment, and membership dues for organizations such as the Regional Business Council and CEO Council which, in the Board’s opinion, are beneficial for the Company. 

  

	 	IV.	Other Compensation Issues 

  

	 	A.	He will not participate in the Profit Sharing Plan of the Company after 6/30/2008. 

  

	 	B.	He will retain full interest in the stock bonus awards and stock option awards that have been provided up to the time of his retirement. These will be allowed to vest according to
the original schedule and terms of the individual agreements with respect to all matters other than the terms of the individual agreements relating to the termination of Mr. Collett’s employment. 









	 	V.	Future Contingencies 

  

	 	A.	The annual fee, board fees and board stock compensation shall cease in the event of the Chairman’s death. 

  

	 	B.	In the event of disability, all payments would continue until the Board of Directors determined that the Chairman could not serve as originally planned for the duration of the term.


  

							
	 Cass Information Systems, Inc.
	 		 	
				
	By:	 	 /s/ Eric H. Brunngraber
	 		 	 /s/ Lawrence A. Collett

	Name:	 	Eric H. Brunngraber	 		 	Lawrence A. Collett
	Title:	 	President and Chief Operating Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-3073 FAE DRISCOLL,

Petitioner,

v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,

Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board

in SF075270409-I-1. ON MOTION 

### ORDER Upon consideration of the United States Postal Service's motion for an extension of time, until July 23, 2009, to file its brief, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. FOR THE COURT 

# JUN 1 6 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk 

# IfitalnatMEMLo poR L CIRCUIT cc: Keith Goffney, Esq. Michelle A. Windmueller, Esq. s8 JUN 16 2009

at fl I ittilbhLif GLAK
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Training
- ASAP.gov: Enrollment Help, Questions and Answers

# ASAP.gov: Enrollment Help, Questions and Answers

Audience:

Recipient Organizations enrolling in ASAP.gov

----

Location:

Online

----

Duration:

Wed., January 20, 2021 | 2:00 - 4:00 pm ET

----

Cost:

Free

----

Hosted by:

Payment Management

----

Point of Contact:

asaphelpdesk@fiscal.treasury.gov

## Event Details:

If you’re a  recipient organization that’s been invited to enroll into ASAP.gov by one of  our customer federal agencies, this training is perfect for you. 

In this  webinar, you’ll be able to get help with any enrollment issues before our next  webinar on How to Make  Payment Requests.            There is no charge for this training.            More details will be sent to you before the webinar date.

 

### Registration

Fields marked with an asterisk(*) are required.

**Dates:**
Exhibit 99

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch  Preferred  Funding V, L.P. (the
"Partnership")  for the period ended June 28, 2002 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, John C. Stomber,
Regular  Trustee of the Trust and Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Merrill
Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust
    and the Partnership.




                   MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V



                   By: /s/ John C. Stomber
                   --------------------------------------------
                   Name: John C. Stomber*
                   Title: Regular Trustee




                   MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.


                   By: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner



                   By: /s/ John C. Stomber
                   --------------------------------------------
                   Name: John C. Stomber*
                   Title: Senior Vice President and Treasurer


Dated: August 9, 2002

___________________________
* John C. Stomber functions as the equivalent of the chief executive officer and
chief financial officer of each of the Trust and the Partnership for purposes of
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
No. 43980.

#### Protests 64690-G, etc., of John Wanamaker (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

On the agreed facts embroidered wearing apparel1 similar to that involved in *Glemby’s*v. *United States*(13 Ct. Cust. Appls. 533, T. D. 41397) and Normandy laces like those the subject of *United States*v. *Amrein*(26 C. C. P. A. 353, C. A. D. 40) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Artificial flowers similar to those involved in *Robinson-Goodman*v. *United States*(17 id. 149, T. D. 43473) were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1419.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4142 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4142

   To increase the penalty for prohibited possession of a phone in a 
                         correctional facility.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 17, 2024

  Mr. Ossoff (for himself and Mr. Grassley) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To increase the penalty for prohibited possession of a phone in a 
                         correctional facility.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Lieutenant Osvaldo Albarati Stopping 
Prison Contraband Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITED POSSESSION OF A PHONE.

    Section 1791(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ``or (d)(1)(F)'' after 
        ``(d)(1)(B)''; and
            (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ``, (d)(1)(E), or 
        (d)(1)(F)'' and inserting ``or (d)(1)(E)''.
                                 <all>
```
-  Home 
          -  Training 
          -  Locations 
          -  Resources 
          -  Careers & Internships 
          -  News 
          -  About 

# Internet Investigations Training Program

Home » Training

Glynco, GA

### Description

The Internet Investigations Training Program (IITP) is designed to give investigators, analysts, and individuals serving as direct law enforcement support a basic understanding of and the skills needed to conduct Internet-based investigations.

Investigating Internet crimes can be one of the most complex tasks facing the law enforcement professional today. It requires a multidisciplinary approach, supported by technical expertise to a degree not commonly seen with traditional crime.

IITP will enable the student to develop the skills necessary to investigate Internet-based crimes in a legally accepted manner, while utilizing open-source and proprietary tools.  Emphasis is placed on the examination and collection of data from social-media, OSINT and the “Dark Web”. Students will be issued an investigative laptop computer with various hardware and software materials used in the training program. The students will be instructed how to properly configure their investigative computer and how to setup investigative profiles and personas. Software will include virtualization, operating system and collection tools. Students will perform various practical exercises to reinforce skills learned during the course. The graduate will leave with all of the equipment and software utilized during the program and will be able to conduct Internet-based investigations upon their return.

### Prerequisites

                  - Applicants should be investigators, intelligence analysts, intelligence specialists, or individuals serving as direct law enforcement support personnel, from the federal, state and local law enforcement community who are tasked with Internet-based investigations.
                  - Students should possess a working knowledge of computers, and the desire to load programs, utilize virtualization and various web browsers as well as install operating systems.  	 

### Required Training Materials

None.

### Program Syllabus/Curriculum

                        - Electronic Law and Evidence
                        - Computer Fundamentals and Internet Principals
                        - Internet Investigative Techniques
                        - Internet and Computer Evidence Collection

### Program Contact Info

**Glynco: (**912) 267-3447**State and Local:** (912) 261-4566

**NOTE:**This course is available for Export, please contact the training specialist at: (912) 267-3447.

### Program Registration

              - Federal organization personnel should contact their agency training officer to register for training or  Contact FLETC Admissions  with any additional questions.
              - State, local and tribal officers requesting training should  register online . If organizational support is required or you have additional needs, please  Contact FLETC Admissions .
              - International (non-US) personnel should email  FLETC-intlrqst@fletc.dhs.gov .
# C_2017369EN.01001401.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2017 — sheepworld v EUIPO (Beste Oma)

(Case T-421/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Beste Oma - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 369/19)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: sheepworld AG (Ursensollen, Germany) (represented by: S. von Rüden, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 May 2016 (Case R 91/2016-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign Beste Oma as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders sheepworld AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders sheepworld AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 343, 19.9.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Bastion Development, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Elliot Bellen, Principal Financial Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.



Date:  November 4, 2011



/s/ Elliot BellenElliot BellenPrincipal Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Patients & Physicians, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three and nine month periods ended September
      30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Form 10-QSB"), I, Fred F. Nazem, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)  The
      Form
      10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
      November 21, 2006


/s/
      Fred
      F. Nazem


Fred
      F.
      Nazem, Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, ThaddeusDupper, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the QuarterlyReport of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of EvolvingSystems, Inc.
| /s/ THADDEUS DUPPER                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Thaddeus Dupper                       |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| May 11, 2007                          |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the ExchangeAct, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference.

----
No. 60057.

#### Olivier Straw Goods Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 280830-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### David HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPARTANBURG COUNTY MAGISTRATE’S OFFICE; Magistrate Hin-son, Individually and in his official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-6277.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 19, 2001.

David Henderson, pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

David Henderson, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Henderson v. Spartanburg County Magistrate’s Office,*No. CA-00-3160-7-24BG (D.S.C. filed Jan. 17, 2001; entered Jan. 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
No. 47352.

#### Protests 34409-K, etc., of Lederer De Paris, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of mufflers similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in Abstract 44055 and that they are printed other than block printed by hand, valued at more than $5 per dozen, and imported subsequent to the effective date of the trade agreement with the United Kingdom. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 1209 was sustained as to these items.
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 3/23/2023 1

Requirement That a Party’s Nominee 

Be a Member of the Party 

South Dakota Libertarian Party v. Gant 

(Lawrence L. Piersol, D.S.D. 4:14-cv-4132) 

A party’s nominee was disqualified because the nominee’s party 

change was not effective until it was received by the county auditor, 

after the nomination. The district judge denied the party and the 

nominee a preliminary injunction, because the minimal burden of 

requiring the party change before the nomination was justified by 

the state’s interest in maintaining party integrity. 

Subject: Getting on the ballot. Topic: Getting on the ballot. 

South Dakota’s Libertarian Party and its candidate for public utilities commissioner filed a federal complaint in the District of South Dakota on August 

25, 2014, against South Dakota’s secretary of state, challenging as unconstitutional the disqualification of the candidate for being a member of the Republican Party.1

 Judge Lawrence L. Piersol set the case for hearing on August 28.2

The plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction on August 27.3

At the hearing, Judge Piersol denied the plaintiffs an injunction and 

granted the defendants a dismissal.4 On October 10, Judge Piersol issued a 

published opinion explaining his ruling.5

The candidate changed his registration on the morning of his nomination, but the change was not received by the county auditor until four days 

later.6

A change in voter registration is not effective until received by the county 

auditor. . . . 

. . . 

. . . [The candidate] easily could have met the affiliation requirement by 

simply filling out a voter registration card [in person] at an approved agency, or by getting the form to the county auditor, any time prior to his nomination.7

Judge Piersol agreed with South Dakota’s argument that “the State has an 

interest in preserving political parties as viable and identifiable groups, enhancing party building efforts, and guarding against party raiding and ‘sore 

1. Complaint, S.D. Libertarian Party v. Gant, No. 4:14-cv-4132 (D.S.D. Aug. 25, 2014), 

D.E. 1. 

2. Order, id. (Aug. 25, 2014), D.E. 7; see Minutes, id. (Aug. 28, 2014), D.E. 14. 

3. Preliminary-Injunction Motion, id. (Aug. 27, 2014), D.E. 9. 

4. Order, id. (Aug. 28, 2014), D.E. 16; S.D. Libertarian Party v. Gant, 60 F. Supp. 3d 1043, 

1043 (D.S.D. 2014). 

5. S.D. Libertarian Party, 60 F. Supp. 3d 1043. 

6. Id. at 1044. 

7. Id.
Requirement That a Party’s Nominee Be a Member of the Party 

2 Federal Judicial Center 3/23/2023 

loser’ candidacies by spurned primary contenders.”8 The minimal burden on 

the party was justified by the state’s legitimate and important interests.9

8. Id. at 1051. 

9. Id. at 1050–51.
July 8. 2015 

U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

AMENDMENT TO 

REGULATORY DOCKET: 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

FAA-2015-1549-0001 

Tadsen Photography LLC is hereby amending its Exemption Request submitted April 21, 

2015 (/{Application") under Regulatory Docket FAA-2015-1549-001 to include the 

activity: 

• Closed Set Filming 

For all of the reasons listed in the Application and enumerated in the attached 

documents, this Exemption Request is also in the public interest, within the FAA's 

authority, and not a danger to the NAS. The safety precautions and procedures 

mandated and followed by Tadsen Photography LLC to create an equivalent level of 

safety are enumerated in the attached confidential document, Tadsen Motion Picture 

and Television Operating Manual (/{MPTOM"). 1 

The Motion Picture Association of America and FAA has reviewed and approved other 

MPTOMs substantially similar to this manual and found them to be acceptable for 

closed set UAS filming operations for the television and movie industry. 

Applicant submits the attached MPTOM and appendices as a Confidential Document 

under 14 CFR 11.35 (b) as the the entire manual contains proprietary information that 

the applicant has not and will not share with others. The manual contains operating 

conditions and procedures that are not available to the public and are protected from 

release under the Freedom of Information Act 5 USC 552 et.seq. 

1 The conditions proposed by the applicant regarding Closed Set Filming are drawn from 

Order 8900.1 CHG 0, Volume 3, Chapter 8-lssue a Certificate of Waiver for Motion 

Picture and Television Filming. 

'' . '--- ' 
Page 2 of 2 

If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact our office. 

Sincerely, 

a~d,Esq. Attorney for Tadsen Photography LLC 

Law Office of Joshua Furnald 

2150 East Washington Ave. 

Madison, Wisconsin 53704 

{608) 347-3471
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00076-CV

Champion Energy Services, LLC

v.

City of Weslaco

On Appeal from the

398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-3865-10-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 15, 2015
No. 64852.

#### Atlas Fibers Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/4003 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

The protest was dismissed.