alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 24
                              IONICS, INCORPORATED

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

We,  the  undersigned  officers  and  directors  of  Ionics,  Incorporated  (the
"Company"),  hereby severally  constitute  Arthur L. Goldstein and Stephen Korn,
and each of them, to sign for us, and in our names in the  capacities  indicated
below,  the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2000,  and any and all  amendments  to such Annual  Report,  hereby
ratifying and  confirming  our signatures as they may be signed by our attorneys
to such Annual Report and any and all amendments thereto.

Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Signature                                   Title                                            Date
<S>                                         <C>                                              <C>

/s/Douglas R. Brown                         Director                                         March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
Douglas R. Brown

/s/Stephen L. Brown                         Director                                         March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
Stephen L. Brown

/s/William L. Brown                         Director                                         March 27, 2001
------------------------------
William L. Brown

/s/Arnaud de Vitry d'Avacourt               Director                                         March 27, 2001
-----------------------------
Arnaud de Vitry d'Avaucourt

/s/Kathleen F. Feldstein                    Director                                         March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
Kathleen F. Feldstein

/s/Arthur L. Goldstein                      Chairman of the Board of Directors               March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
Arthur L. Goldstein                         Chief Executive Officer and President
                                            (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/William E. Katz                          Director                                         March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
William E. Katz

/s/William K. Reilly                        Director                                         March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
William K. Reilly

                                            Director
John J. Shields

/s/Carl S. Sloane                           Director                                         March 27, 2001
----------------------------------
Carl S. Sloane

/s/Daniel I. C. Wang                        Director                                         March 27, 2001
-------------------------------
Daniel I. C. Wang

/s/Mark S. Wrighton                         Director                                         March 27, 2001
------------------------------
Mark S. Wrighton

/s/Allen S. Wyett                           Director                                         March 27, 2001
--------------------------------
Allen S. Wyett
</TABLE>
Before the Second Division,

December 17, 1941

No. 46697.

#### Protest 8123-K/88787 of Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Chicago).

*417Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 43553 the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
# sec5_scnp_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2020-15	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2020
No. 46073.

#### Protests 836233-G, etc., of American Import Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Dallinger, J.

The record showed that the ages of the children using the baseball sets in question ranged from 5 to 7 years. They were therefore held properly classified as toys under paragraph 1513. *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 48573) distinguished.
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 8/23/2023 1

Denial of Voter-Registration Efforts 

Goodwin v. Meyer 

(William F. Downes, D. Wyo. 1:04-cv-256) 

A federal complaint challenged state proscriptions on voterregistration drives. The district judge determined that the plaintiffs 

had failed to show irreparable injury because voter-registration 

forms were available on the internet. 

Subject: Registration procedures. Topic: Registration 

procedures. 

Three citizens of Wyoming and 40 Doe plaintiffs filed a federal complaint in 

Wyoming’s Casper courthouse on September 23, 2004, against Wyoming’s 

secretary of state, three county clerks, and 20 unknown government officials, 

challenging Wyoming’s proscriptions on voter-registration drives.1 Each of 

the named plaintiffs apparently was refused a voter-registration form in one 

of the named counties.2

 Five days later, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a 

preliminary injunction and expedited hearing.3

 The court set a hearing for 

three days after that.4

Attorneys for the plaintiffs and the secretary appeared at the hearing in 

person, and attorneys for the counties appeared by telephone.5 Three days 

later, Judge William F. Downes denied the injunction by telephone.6 Ten 

days after that, Judge Downes issued a written ruling, concluding that the 

plaintiffs failed to show irreparable injury because voter-registration forms 

were available on the internet.7 On November 12, Judge Downes granted the 

plaintiffs a voluntary dismissal.8

1. Complaint, Goodwin v. Meyer, No. 1:04-cv-256 (D. Wyo. Sept. 23, 2004), D.E. 1. 

2. Id. at 3–4. 

3. Motion, id. (Sept. 28, 2004), D.E. 3. 

4. Notice, id. (Sept. 30, 2004), D.E. 6. 

5. Minutes, id. (Oct. 1, 2004), D.E. 18. 

6. Minutes, id. (Oct. 4, 2004), D.E. 19; see Ilene Olson, Tort Reform in Wyoming Attracts 

Out-of-Town Attorney, Wyo. Trib.-Eagle, Oct. 5, 2004. 

Judge Downes retired on July 24, 2011. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of 

Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

7. Order, Goodwin, No. 1:04-cv-256 (D. Wyo. Oct. 14, 2004), D.E. 24. 

8. Order, id. (Nov. 15, 2004), D.E. 31.
Analytics

FLETC All Website Data

All Web Site Data

Go to report 

FLETC.gov Web Performance Metrics Jun 1, 2021 - Jun 30, 2021

Total Visits

69,550

% of Total: 100.00% (69,550)

Avg. Visit Duration

00:02:10

Avg for View: 00:02:10 (0.00%)

Pageviews

185,434

% of Total: 100.00% (185,434)

Unique Visitors

53,516

% of Total: 100.00% (53,516)

Avg. Pages / Visit

2.67

Avg for View: 2.67 (0.00%)

Avg. Time on Page

00:01:18

Avg for View: 00:01:18 (0.00%)

Bounce Rate

53.31%

Avg for View: 53.31% (0.00%)

Top Pages

Page Title Pageviews

Bounce

Rate

Frontpage | Federal Law Enforcem

ent Training Centers

25,892 41.12%

Search the Training Catalog | Feder

al Law Enforcement Training Cente

rs

20,557 34.21%

Glynco, Georgia | Federal Law Enfo

rcement Training Centers

9,773 43.83%

Execution of a Search Warrant (I)

(MP3) | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

5,147 90.46%

Search | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

4,935 55.07%

PEB Scores for Age and Gender | F

ederal Law Enforcement Training C

enters

4,638 7.59%

Artesia, New Mexico | Federal Law

Enforcement Training Centers

4,140 41.24%

Basic Programs | Federal Law Enfo

rcement Training Centers

3,441 28.27%

State, Local & Tribal Law Enforcem

ent Training | Federal Law Enforce ment Training Centers2,911 38.81%

Locations | Federal Law Enforcem

ent Training Centers

2,667 45.64%

Visits by Social Network

Social Network Sessions

Facebook 585

LinkedIn 31

reddit 18

Twitter 15

Quora 14

YouTube 8

Instagram 7

Yelp 1

Visits by Source

New vs. Returned Visitors

google (direct) bing

dhs.gov sass.fletc.dhs.gov

Other

23.9% 59.7%

New Visitor Returning Visitor

17.1%

82.9%

All Users

100.00% Sessions
© 2021 Google
Analytics

FLETC All Website Data

All Web Site Data

Go to report 

FLETC.gov Search Performance Metrics Jun 1, 2021 - Jun 30, 2021

Visits to FLETC.gov

69,550

% of Total: 100.00% (69,550)

Total Internal Searches

0

% of Total: 0.00% (0)

Total External Searches (Google)

46,696

% of Total: 67.14% (69,550)

Top Internal Searches by Search Term

Search Term Total Unique Searches Organic Searches

There is no data for this view.

Top External Searches (Google - as reported)

Page Title Sessions

Frontpage | Federal Law Enforcement T

raining Centers

7,904

Execution of a Search Warrant (I) (MP

3) | Federal Law Enforcement Training

Centers

4,511

Glynco, Georgia | Federal Law Enforce ment Training Centers

2,121

Search the Training Catalog | Federal L

aw Enforcement Training Centers

1,559

FedBizOpps | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

1,179

PEB Scores for Age and Gender | Feder

al Law Enforcement Training Centers

1,071

Artesia, New Mexico | Federal Law Enfo

rcement Training Centers

908

Physical Efficiency Battery (PEB) | Fede

ral Law Enforcement Training Centers

844

P.O.S.T. Certification | Federal Law Enf

orcement Training Centers

814

Criminal Investigator Training Program

| Federal Law Enforcement Training Ce

nters

758

New vs. Returned Visitors

Avg. Visits per Visitor

New Visitor Returning Visitor

17.1%

82.9%

1 2 Other

16.9%

11.6%

71.5%

© 2021 Google

All Users

100.00% Sessions
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00191

- CV

E RICA Q UINN

, Appellant

V

.

S TATE F ARM L LOYDS ; S TATE F ARM

L LOYDS

, I NC

. ; J IM G OLDSWORTHY ;

H AROLD D. B AKER AS T RUSTEE OF

H AROLD D

. AND M ADONNA A.

B AKER T RUST ; R ANDALL T ODD

B AKER AND S HELLY Z OYLA B AKER

, C O

- T RUSTEES AS T RUSTEE OF THE

N EW C OVENANT F AMILY R EVOCABLE

T RUST ; R ANDALL T ODD B AKER ;

S HELLY Z OYLA B AKER ; M ICHAEL

S TEVEN W EY ; R ANDALL H OUSTON

H ARBERT ; AND C HUCK P EDROSO

, Appellees §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 235th District

Court

of Cooke County ( CV19

- 00103 )

June 1, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court ’s judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s of the

trial court are affirmed.It is further ordered that Appellant Erica Quinn shall pay all costs of this

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By / s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAVIER RAIGOZA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1208 GEB KJM

vs.

ARAMARK CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Defendants’ motion for extension of the deposition limit came on regularly for

hearing July 20, 2005. Randy Andrus appeared for plaintiff. Mona Badani appeared for

defendants. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the

arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS

FOLLOWS:

1. Defendants’ motion is granted in part. Depositions noticed by defendants shall

be limited to a total of seventy hours, subject to good faith scheduling by the parties.

2. The court finds, taking into account all the circumstances relating to

defendants’ motion, an award of expenses under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37 would be

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01208-GEB -KJM Document 42 Filed 07/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

unjust; the request for expenses accordingly is denied.

DATED: July 20, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

006 raigoza.oah

Case 2:04-cv-01208-GEB -KJM Document 42 Filed 07/21/05 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2016-1363 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2015-CE-040-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
No. 57665.

#### Bergdorf Goodman Co. and Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 209911-K and 208351-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of beaded bags the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56124, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Anti-cipatedBudg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin/ 

End

Debit/ 

Credit

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ Nonfed

Trading 

Prtnr

Trading 

Partner 

Main Fund Type

Reporting 

Type Code

Financing 

Account 

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

193000 Lessor Lease Receivable N P D B/E D/C CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

193900 Allowance for Loss on Lease Receivable N P C B/E D/C CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

195000 Lessee Right-To-Use Lease Asset N P D B/E D/C CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

195900 Accumulated Amortization on Lessee Lease Assets N P C B/E D/C CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

233000 Unearned Lessor Revenue N P C B/E D/C CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

293000 Lessee Lease Liability N P C B/E D/C CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

293010 Unfunded Lessee Lease Liability N P C B/E D/C CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

593000 Lessor Lease Revenue N P C E D/C X F/N ### /#### CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

593300 Amortization of Unearned Lessor Revenue N P C E D/C X N CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

593900 Contra Revenue for Lessor Lease Revenue N P D E D/C X F/N ### /#### CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

671300 Lessee Lease Amortization N P D E D/C N CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

693000 Lessee Lease Expense N P D E D/C F/N ### /#### CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

Fiscal Year 2024 Reporting

Section IV

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Attribute Table

U S S G L A C C O U N T USSGL ATTRIBUTES B U L K F I L E A T T R I B U T E S T A S A T T R I B U T E S

DRAFT IRC IV AT - 1 February 2024
Exhibit No. 99.2


Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Journal Communications, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, based
on my knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Steven J. Smith
----------------------------------
Steven J. Smith
March 31, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Journal Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Journal
Communications, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

                                       75
<PAGE>   1


                               M E M O R A N D U M

Date:    September 15, 1995

To:               Form 10-K Exhibit List

Re:               Summary of Mercury Air Group, Inc. Officer Life Insurance 
                  Policies with Benefits Payable to Officers or Their Designated
                  Beneficiaries

From:    Kathryn McCuskey
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         The Company presently maintains the following life insurance policies
on the lives of the officers of the corporation:

         1. Seymour Kahn. The Company maintains a whole-life insurance policy on
the life of Mr. Kahn which provides a death benefit in the amount of $5,025,000,
with $3,000,000 payable to the Company and $2,025,000 payable to Mr. Kahn's
designated beneficiary. The Company is entitled to receive the cash surrender
value of this policy and may use the cash surrender value to fund premiums.

         2. Joseph A. Czyzyk. The Company maintains whole-life insurance
policies on the life of Mr. Czyzyk which provide death benefits in the amount of
$1,500,000, with $1,000,000 payable to the Company and $500,000 payable to Mr.
Czyzyk's designated beneficiary. The Company is entitled to receive the cash
surrender value of these policies up to the amount of premiums paid, with the
remainder of the cash surrender value to be paid to the designated beneficiary.

         3. Kevin Walsh. The Company maintains a whole-life insurance policy on
the life of Mr. Walsh which provides a death benefit in the amount of $750,000,
with $500,000 payable to the Company and $250,000 payable to the designated
beneficiary of Mr. Walsh. The Company is entitled to receive the cash surrender
value of this policy up to the amount of premiums paid, with the remainder of
the cash surrender value to be paid to the designated beneficiary.

         4. Randolph E. Ajer. The Company maintains a whole-life insurance
policy on the life of Mr. Ajer which provides a death benefit in the amount of
$750,000, with $500,000 payable to the Company and $250,000 payable to Mr.
Ajer's designated beneficiary. The Company is entitled to receive the cash
surrender value of this policy up to the amount of premiums paid, with the
remainder of the cash surrender value to be paid to the designated beneficiary.

         5. William L. Silva. The Company maintains a whole-life insurance
policy on the life of Mr. Silva which provides a death benefit in the amount of
$750,000, with $500,000 payable to the Company and $250,000 payable to Mr.
Silva's designated beneficiary. The Company is entitled to receive the cash
surrender value of this policy up to the amount of premiums paid, with the
remainder of the cash surrender value to be paid to the designated beneficiary.

                                  Exhibit 10.6
Case 2:04-cv-01172-GEB-GGH   Document 34    Filed 06/22/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-27T13:27:15-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SherwoodBrands, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Uziel Frydman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, asadopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: December 12, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/ Uziel Frydman                       |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Uziel Frydman                           |   |
|   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive |
|   | Officer                                 |   |
|        |                                         |        |  |  |

 

----