alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Page 1 of 3

Bulletin No. 2021-20

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to Bulletin No. 2021-17, U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury 

Financial Manual (TFM) Supplement

1. Purpose: This bulletin notifies agencies that Part 1 and Part 2 of the USSGL Supplement have been 

revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 and FY 2022. 

2. Summary of Changes: The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. 

3. Changes by Part/Section/File: 

Part 1 - FY 2021 Reporting changes to files in Sections I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII:

Section I: Chart of Accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting 

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2021 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Balance Sheet

 Statement of Changes in Net Position

 Statement of custodial Activity

 Statement of Budgetary Resources
Page 2 of 3

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2021 Reporting

 Reclassified Balance Sheet

 Reclassified Statement of Net Cost

 Reclassified Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position 

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2021 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

Part 2 - FY 2022 Reporting changes to files in Sections I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII:

Section I: Chart of Accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2022 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Balance Sheet

 Statement of Changes in Net Position

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 Statement of Custodial Activity

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2022 Reporting

 Reclassified Balance Sheet

 Reclassified Statement of Net Cost

 Reclassified Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position 
Page 3 of 3

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2022 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

4. Effective Date: 

Part 1 requirements for FY 2021 are effective immediately. 

Part 2 requirements for FY 2022 are effective immediately. 

5. Inquiries: 

Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Chris Beck

Director, General Ledger and Intragovernmental Transaction Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Email: USSGLTeam@fiscal.treasury.gov

Date: August 18, 2021
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (b)

     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Form 10-Q"), I, Gary Jones, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

      (1)   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d));
      and

      (2)   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

DATE: 11-14-03

/s/ GARY S. JONES
    ----------------------------
Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Amendment No. 1 to Capital Support Agreement



 EXHIBIT 10.6 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 CAPITAL SUPPORT AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 (the “Amendment”) to the Capital Support Agreement, is made as
of the 15th day of July 2008, by and between the Northern Trust Corporation (the “Support Provider”) and Northern Trust Global Funds plc
(the “Company”) on behalf of its sub-fund The U.S. Dollar Fund (the “Fund”). 
 WHEREAS, the parties have entered
into a Capital Support Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of February 21, 2008; and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend
the Agreement on the terms and subject to the conditions provided herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, the parties, intending to be legally bound,
hereby agree as follows: 
 1. Unless otherwise expressly provided herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings assigned to them in the
Agreement. 
 2. Section 3(c)(iii) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced as set forth below: 
 (iii) 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 28, 2009. 
 3. If the Board of Directors of the Fund (the “Board”) determines that the Maximum Contribution Amount, reduced by the amount of any Capital Contribution previously made by the Support Provider to the Fund,
will not be sufficient to maintain the Fund’s net asset value per share at no less than the Minimum Permissible NAV, the Board, at its option, may cause the Fund to sell the Eligible Notes. Such sale is a “sale” for purposes of
Section 1(c) of the Agreement, which defines a “Contribution Event.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties caused this Amendment No. 1 to the Capital Support Agreement to be executed this 15th day of July
2008. 








			
	NORTHERN TRUST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ William R. Dodds, Jr.

	Name:	 	William R. Dodds, Jr.
	Title:	 	Treasurer
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	50 South LaSalle Street
	Chicago
	Illinois 60675
	United States of America
	
	 NORTHERN TRUST GLOBAL
 FUNDS PLC FOR AND ON
BEHALF
 OF THE U. S. DOLLAR FUND

		
	By :	 	 /s/ John Fitzpatrick

	Name:	 	John Fitzpatrick
	Title:	 	Director
	
	ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
	
	George’s Court
	54-62 Townsend Street
	Dublin 2
	Ireland
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 36489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14689]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

 Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for June 21, 2012, at 10 a.m. in the Commission offices at the National 
Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street NW., 
Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, 
parks, and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: June 4, 2012 in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary, AIA.
[FR Doc. 2012-14689 Filed 6-18-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6331-01-M
```
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO **

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 **

| Date:                October                16, 2006 | By: */s/                John B.                Gallagher                                        *                  |
|------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 | Name: John                B. Gallagher                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|                                                 | Title:                 Co-Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |
|                                                 |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| Date:                October                16, 2006 | By: */s/                Harry D.                Shields                                           * |
|                                                 | Name: Harry                D. Shields                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|                                                 | Title:                 Co-Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

----
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of American BankNote Holographics, Inc. (the “Company”), that the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end ofthe period covered by the Report and the results of operations of the Company forthe period covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | By: /s/ Kenneth H. Traub              |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Kenneth H. Traub                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Date:  May 10, 2004

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided toAmerican Bank Note Holographics, Inc. and will be retained by AmericanBank Note Holographics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

Vance Edward Johnson,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. S 04-0776 LKK PAN P

vs. Order on Request for Counsel

D. L. Runnels, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in a civil rights action. Plaintiff moved for

appointment of counsel May 2, 2005. 

In proceedings that do not threaten a litigant with loss of

physical liberty, there presumptively is no right to appointed

counsel. Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18,

26-27 (1981). Section 1915(e)(1) of Title 28 confers discretion

upon the court to request counsel represent an indigent civil

litigant. Mallard v. District Court, 490 U.S. 296 (1989).

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 16 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In deciding whether to appoint counsel the court exercises

discretion governed by a number of factors, including the

likelihood of success on the merits and the applicant’s ability

to present his claims in light of their complexity. Weygandt v.

Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983); see also, LaMere v.

Risley, 827 F.2d 622, 626 (9th Cir. 1987). Ordinarily the

presumption of regularity in the state’s procedures for confining

prisoners suggests a lack of likely success and counsels against

appointment of counsel. See Maclin v. Freake, 650 F.2d 885, 887

(7th Cir. 1981). As a general rule, the court will not appoint

counsel unless the applicant shows his claim has merit in fact

and law. Id. Even if the applicant overcomes this hurdle, the

court will not appoint counsel if the law is settled and the

material facts are within the plaintiff’s possession, viz., they

do not require investigation outside the prison walls. Id. at

887-88.

It is impossible to evaluate these factors by reference to

plaintiff’s May 2, 2005, pleading. By separate order, plaintiff

will receive an explanation of what the procedural rules require

of a complaint. 

Plaintiff’s May 2, 2005, request for the appointment of

counsel is denied without prejudice to its renewal later in these

proceedings.

So ordered.

Dated: June 2, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 16 Filed 06/03/05 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 01-4891

ANTHONY GEORGE COOK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston.

Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge.

(CR-01-143)

Submitted: June 25, 2002

Decided: July 11, 2002

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Mary Lou Newberger, Federal Public Defender, Brian J. Kornbrath,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellant. Kasey Warner, United States Attorney, Larry R. Ellis,

Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for

Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Anthony George Cook pled guilty to mailing threatening communications, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 876 (1994), pursuant to a plea

agreement. Cook appeals his sentence and conviction. Finding no

reversible error, we affirm. 

Cook contends the Government breached the plea agreement. This

Court reviews a claim of breach of a plea agreement de novo. United

States v. Martin, 25 F.3d 211, 217 (4th Cir. 1994). Disputes about

what the parties said or did are reviewed under the clearly erroneous

standard. Id. A defendant bears the burden of showing a breach of the

plea agreement by a preponderance of the evidence. United States v.

Dixon, 998 F.2d 228, 230 (4th Cir. 1993); United States v. Connor,

930 F.2d 1073, 1076 (4th Cir. 1991). A careful review of the record

shows the Government did not breach the plea agreement. 

Cook also contends the district court erred in determining the

extent of the upward departure to which he was subject. The district

court enhanced Cook’s offense level by fourteen based on extreme

conduct, U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5K2.8 (2000), and dismissed and uncharged conduct, USSG § 5K2.21, thereby increasing

Cook’s sentencing guidelines range from six to twelve months to

fifty-one to sixty-three months. The district court’s determination of

the extent of a departure is reviewed for abuse of discretion. United

States v. Hummer, 916 F.2d 186, 192 (4th Cir. 1990). The court must

articulate a basis for the extent of the departure. See United States v.

Gary, 18 F.3d 1123, 1130 (4th Cir. 1994). The district court at sentencing gave a detailed explanation of its reasons for departing to a

sentence of 60 months, and we find the sentence was not an abuse of

discretion. 

Accordingly, we affirm Cook’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

2 UNITED STATES v. COOK
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

UNITED STATES v. COOK 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

LESLYN SYREN, SBN 206119

RUSHFORD & BONOTTO

2277 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 495

SACRAMENTO, CA 95825

Telephone: (916) 565-0590

Fax: (916) 565-0599

Attorney for Defendants

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD WILSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

IHOP CORP.; P & V INTERNATIONAL,

INC. DBA IHOP #1705; JOE MASSOLO

& SONS TRUCKING CO., et al.,

Defendants.

 

Case No. CIV.S.04-0631 MCE CMK

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL 

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S.04-

0631 MCE CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: April 18, 2005

__________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00631-MCE -CMK Document 15 Filed 04/19/05 Page 1 of 1
March 24, 1948

No. 52239.

Suit 4562.

#### United States *v.*Waterbury Lock & Specialty Co.

C. D_ 1025 affirmed January 27, 1948. C. A. D. 384.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SKYWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. 2012-NM-060025 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0292 

RECEI\/ED 

SEP 2 3 2015 

HEARING DOCKET 

RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FORAN EXTENSION OF TIME 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.233(c)(l), by agreement of the Parties, Respondent requests 

an extension of time to perfect its Reply to Complainant's Appeal Brief and states the following 

in support: 

1. On May 29, 2015, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Richard C. Goodwin issued 

an Initial Decision in the above-captioned matter. 

2. On June 5, 2015, Complainant filed a timely Notice of Appeal. 

3. Complainant requested and received an extension on June 24, 2015, and filed its 

Appeal Brief on August 21, 2015. 

4. Respondent's counsel has conferred with Complainant's co1msel and the parties 

have agreed to extend the time period for perfecting Respondent's Reply to Complainant's 

Appeal Brief by 30 days. 

WHEREFORE, Respondent respectfully requests the Decisionmaker grant an extension 

of time until October 26, 2015 to file its Reply Brief. 

Dated: September 22, 2015 

__ Respectfully submitted, 

"·~ct~) 

Todd C. Emerson 

444 South River Road 

St. George, Utah 84 790 

Telephone: (435) 634-3530 

Facsimile: (435) 634-3505 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I served by Federal Express, the original and one copy of the 

foregoing RESPONDENT'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME in the matter of 

SkyWest Airlines, Inc., FDMS NO.FAA 2013-0292, addressed to: 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue SW 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2Wl 00 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

In addition, I hereby certify that I served a copy of the same by E-mail 

(Casey.Gardner@faa.gov) and U.S. Mail, addressed to: 

Casey E. Gardner 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Counsel for Complainant 

Dated: September 22, 2015
Motion of 

BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. ,•-; 

::- ~ -- ~: .:-~~-

' - - · .. _:_ i.- ... i :,; ·.£ 

~ ; r, ---

1 ~:~ -i 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1996-1203 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

FRANCIS C. HEIL 

Managing Director -

Legal and Government Affairs 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5642 

francis.heil@aa.com 

May 7, 2014 
Motion of 

BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7) 

DOT-OST-1996-1203 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby 

moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 1Q2014, be accorded 

confidential treatment and withheld from public disclosure. 

The information for which confidential treatment is requested 

pertains to American's airframe and aircraft engine 

acquisitions and retirements. 

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 

41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report 

electronically to esubmit.rita.dot. 

On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted 

confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data 

filed by American. For the reasons stated in that letter, the 

current submission should also receive confidential treatment 

for 10 years. 
2 -

WHEREFORE, American moves that the schedule being 

submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be 

withheld from public disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 

10 years. 

May 7, 2014 

Respectfully submitted, 

Francis C. Heil 

Managing Director -

Legal and Government Affairs 

American Airlines, Inc.
Exhibit 21



                             List of Subsidiaries
                                     of
                      Furniture Brands International, Inc.


                                                   Jurisdiction of
               Name of Subsidiary                    Incorporation 
               ------------------                  ---------------

          Action Transport, Inc.                     Delaware

          Action Industries, Inc.                    Mississippi

          Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc.        North Carolina

          Broyhill Transport, Inc.                   North Carolina

          Fayette Enterprises, Inc.                  Mississippi

          Lane Advertising, Inc.                     Virginia

          Lane Furniture Industries, Inc.            Delaware

          The Lane Company, Incorporated             Virginia

          Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.     Delaware

          Thomasville Furniture Latin America, S.A.  Panama

          Furniture Brands Export Co., Ltd.          Barbados<PAGE>