alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Chernours f\ECE!VEO 

OPPT Ctl!C 

The Chemours Company 

Fluoroproducts 

2015 OCT 26 AM 6: 08 

67 Canal Road, P. 0. Box 9001 

Chambers Works- Pedersen Building 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

October 16, 2015 Certified Mail- Return Receipt Requested 

7015 0640 0005 9657 6289 

CBIC Control Number 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Taxies 

EPA East 

Room4146 

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

RE: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0012 

~ •J-~·•4 

RECEIVED 

NOV 13 2015 · 

EPA DOCKET CENTER 

Chemours Chambers WorlQl NJPDES Permit No. NJOOOSlOO 

PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

September 2015 Sample Data 

Dear Chemical Control Division: 

366696 

Attached please find summaries ofPFOA analytical results for the Chemours 

Chambers Works weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in 

September 2015. 

In accordance with the cmTent site NJPDES permit (NJ00051 00, effective September 

2011 ), these results are provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic 

discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures include two paper and two electronic 

copies of the analytical results from this monitoring period. 

NJDEP has asked The Chemours Company FC, LLC to analyze for and report 

monthly Spot 662 PFNA concentrations for the next 12 months. The third of the 

requested 12 samples is reported in the attached table. 

Enclosures 
Analyte 

PFOA 

PFNA 

I 

Sample 10 

Date 

Top (ft) 

Total (D/ Bottom (ft) 

units Diss. (D) Duplicate# 

ug/L T 

ug/L T 

Summary of Analytical Results 

662- September 2015 

662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 

9/8/15 9114/15 9/21/15 9/28/15 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

1 1 1 11 

2.65 3.211 2.56 2.66 

NA NA 0.234 NA 

PFNA- Perfluorononanoic Acid 

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid 

ug/L = micrograms per Liter 

ug/L- micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) 

LOQ = limit of quantification = 0.100 ug/L 1 

NA - not analyzed L I 

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 

represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 9/21115. 

Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported results for 

the sample collected on 9/21/15 represent the average of lab 

duplicate results. 

I I I I 

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. 

I I I I i 

< and NO = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 

Copy of cwk 662 grab results_sep15.xls:Sheet1 

10116/2015 2:12PM
No. 49637.

#### Protest 935128-G of Samuel S. Perry (Seattle).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the hearing it was found that it was the duty of the collector to transmit the protest to this court in order that the importer might have the benefit of a hearing and produce proof of his authority. Following *United Bulb Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 78, C. D. 431) and *Rhodes*v. *United States*(7 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 528) cited by plaintiff, the protest was sustained, and the court held that the original protest should be forwarded to this court in order that plaintiff may obtain a judicial ruling. T. D. 50565, amending article 849 (a), Customs Regulations of 1937, and section 17.2, Customs Regulations of 1943, promulgated subsequent to the collector’s refusal to accept the protest, noted.
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Jaclyn, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), the
undersigned each hereby certifies that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: September 28, 2004              /s/ ROBERT CHESTNOV
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Robert Chestnov, President
                                       (Chief Executive Officer)


Dated: September 28, 2004              /s/ ANTHONY CHRISTON
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Anthony Christon,
                                       Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Jaclyn, Inc. and will be retained by Jaclyn, Inc. and forwarded to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23

- 60010 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,** 
Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Cadrius Baker,**
Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 97

- 1

**__________________ ____________**  Before **Barksdale, Engelhardt,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** Following a bench trial, Cadrius Baker was convicted of : making a false statement while acquiring , or attempting to acquire , a firearm ; making a false statement concerning information in an official record ; and possession of a firearm by a prohibited person , in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(6),

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED November 1, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-60010 Document: 00516953115 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/01/2023No. 23

- 60010

2 (n) , and 924(a)(1)(A)

. He contends the district court erred by den ying his request for a Guideline § 3E1.1 adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. Because the sentencing court is in a unique position to evaluate defendant’s acceptance of responsibility, great deference is afforded t he court’s finding: o ur court will “affirm the denial of a reduction for acceptance of responsibility unless it is without foundation, a standard of review more deferential than the clearly erroneous standard”

. United States v. Lord , 915 F.3d 1009, 1017 (5th Cir. 2019 ) (citation omitted) ; s ee Guideline § 3E1.1 cmt . n.5.

Baker does not me e t this standard. The court’s rejection of the requested adjustment was based on an implicit adverse credibility finding we will not disturb. See United States v. Spir es , 79 F.3d 464, 467 (5th Cir. 1996) (explaining decisions concerning acceptance of responsibility will almost always be upheld because they are heavily dependent on credibility determinations)

. **AFFIRMED**

. Case: 23-60010 Document: 00516953115 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/01/2023
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TUYEN NGUYEN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0655 LKK KJM PS

vs.

DAVID MARTIN,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Findings and recommendations were filed October 17, 2005 recommending this

action be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff has filed a letter indicating plaintiff was

under the mistaken impression that the status conference set for October 12, 2005 was vacated

due to a bankruptcy filing by defendant. The court’s docket does not reflect a notice of

bankruptcy nor is there any indication in which court such bankruptcy was filed. In any event, it

now appears plaintiff has not abandoned the litigation and wishes to proceed. Absent notice of

defendant’s filing of bankruptcy, which imposes an automatic stay, this litigation should proceed

forward. At the time this action was referred to the undersigned, the discovery and law and

motion cut-offs already had passed. Accordingly, dates will be set for pretrial conference and

trial.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00655-LKK -KJM Document 45 Filed 10/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The October 17, 2005 findings and recommendations are vacated.

2. The pretrial conference is set for February 13, 2006 at 1:30 p.m. before the

Honorable Lawrence K. Karlton. Pretrial statements shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule

16-281.

3. Trial of this matter is set for May 16, 2006 at 10:30 a.m. before the Honorable

Lawrence K. Karlton. The parties shall file trial briefs in accordance with Local Rule 16-285.

DATED: October 25, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

nguyen.vac

Case 2:04-cv-00655-LKK -KJM Document 45 Filed 10/25/05 Page 2 of 2
Louis D. Levinson, International Financial Group, Inc., Guilford Specialty Group, Inc., Guilford Insurance Company, and The Burlington Insurance 

# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 31, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00606

- CV

ARGO GROUP US , Inc., Colony Management Services, Inc., Colony Insurance Company, Colony National Insurance Company, Colony Specialty Insurance Company, Co lony Agency

Services, Inc., and Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.,

Appellant s

v.

Louis D. LEVINSON , International Financial Group, Inc., Guilford Specialty Group, Inc., Guilford Insurance Company, and The Burlington Insurance Company, Appellee s

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014

- CI

- 09550 Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees' motion for leave to file surreply to appellants' reply to appellees' response to appellants' motion for rehearing is hereby GRANTED.

__ _______________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 31st day of March, 20 15

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NO. 07-11-0165-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL B JANUARY 30, 2012

_________________________ COREY CONNER, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________ FROM THE 364TH DISTRICT CO URT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY; NO. 2010-426,098; HONORABLE BRAD LEY S. UNDERWOOD, PRESIDING

__________________________ Memorandum Opinion

__________________________ Before QUINN, C.J., a nd CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appellant Corey Conner cha llenges his conviction of mu rder by contending the State improperly bolstered and vouched for the credibility of its witnesses during closing argument. We affirm the judgment because the complain t was not preserved for appeal. Error pertaining to jury argument is waiv ed by the failure to make a timely and proper objection. Estrada v. State, 313 S.W.3d 274, 303 (Tex . Crim. App. 2010), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 131 S.Ct. 905 , 178 L.Ed.2d 760 (2011); Miles v. State , 312 S.W.3d2 909, 911 (Tex. App.–Houston [1 st Dist.] 2010, pet. ref’d); Lange v. State, 57 S.W.3d 458, 467 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2002, pet. ref’d). Moreover, the grounds underlying any objection uttered at trial must com port with those asserted on appeal. Pena v. State, 285 S.W.3d 459, 464 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009). Because appellant did not object to some of the comments in question and the objecti on raised regarding other s failed to comport with his complaint on appeal, the purported e rrors were not preserved for review. 1 Appellant concedes as much but nonetheless asks us to deem the complaint “plain error” under United States v. Gracia, 522 F.3d 597 (5 th Cir. 2008) and dispense with the preservation requirement. To do that, however, would be to ignore holdings of the Texas Court of Criminal A ppeals akin to that in Estrada. We may not do that. Instead, we invite appellant to propose his request fo r a new standard of review to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Accordingly, the issue is overru led, and the judgment is affirmed.

Brian Quinn Chief Justice Do not publish.

1 At one point, appellant objected to the prosecutor ’s reference to the statements purportedly made by individuals who did not testif y. When the prosecutor explained that he was only referring to the fact that statements were taken and not to their cont ent, appellant responded, “[t]hat’s fine.” The court then overruled the objection.
Certification of Principal
Executive Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 and
Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427
 
 I, Tammy
Lynn McNabb, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Welwind Energy International
Corp.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting the occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
      April 4, 2008
              
              /s/ Tammy
      Lynn McNabbTammy
      Lynn McNabb
                Principal
      Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                      EXHIBIT 23






Independent Auditors' Consent





     We consent to the incorporation by reference in
Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement 
No. 33-52674 of American Banknote Corporation on Form S-8; 
Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement 
No. 33-67560 of American Banknote Corporation on Form S-8; and
Registration Statement No. 33-58455 of American Banknote
Corporation on Form S-8 of our report dated February 21, 1997
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of American 
Banknote Corporation for the year ended December 31, 1996.







s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
March 27, 1997
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 36 (Friday, February 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3103]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Board of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for 
Occupational Safety and Health: Notice of Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Board of Scientific Counselors, 
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human 
Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through February 3, 
2009.
    For information, contact Dr. Roger Rosa, Executive Secretary, Board 
of Scientific Counselors, National Institute for Occupational Safety 
and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of 
Health and Human Services, CDC/Washington Office, HHH Building, 200 
Independence Ave, SW., Room 715H, MS P12, Washington, DC 20201--
telephone 202/205-7856 or fax 202/260-4464.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for 
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: February 15, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-3103 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 359 Filed 12/02/14 Page 1 of 2
X

DECEMBER 1, 2014

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 359 Filed 12/02/14 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 8650)

Entry No. 35430.

#### Otto Kadmon *v.*United States

(Decided September 14, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above consists of electric bulbs imported from Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the export value at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of Japan in the usual wholesale quantity in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including the costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States are the appraised values less five per centum buying commission. There was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise bere involved, and that sucb values were tbe appraised values, less 5 per centum buying commission.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
optiontreatmentsideletter.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing





Exhibit 10.1   

 [Executive] 

Hercules Incorporated 

Hercules Plaza 

1313 North Market Street 

Wilmington, Delaware 19894-0001

Confidential

Hercules Incorporated 

Hercules Plaza 

1313 North Market Street

July 10, 2008

To whom it may concern:

     Reference is made to the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), dated as of July 10, 2008, among Ashland Inc., Ashland Sub One Inc. and Hercules Incorporated (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used in this letter agreement that are not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to those terms in the Merger Agreement. I agree as follows:

	1.     	From the date hereof through the earlier of the Effective Time or the termination of the Merger Agreement, I will not exercise any Company Stock Options[; provided, however, that during such period I may exercise Company Stock Options with respect to up to 37,000 shares of Company Common Stock].1
	 
	2.     	All of my Company Stock Options that are outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time shall be treated as Cash Electing Options under the terms of the Merger Agreement and this letter agreement shall constitute my irrevocable election to that effect[; provided, however, that if and to the extent that Ashland Inc. determines in its sole discretion that the conversion of my Company Stock Options with an exercise price equal to or greater than the Cash Out Amount (“Underwater Options”) would not result in Ashland Inc. exceeding the Applicable Limitation, my Underwater Options shall constitute Stock Electing Options under the terms of the Merger Agreement (it being understood that, to the extent the number of available Stock Electing Options is limited, any such treatment shall apply on a pro rata basis taking into account the Underwater Options held by the two other executive officers of the Company who have executed an “Option Treatment Side Letter” containing this proviso regarding Underwater Options; and provided, further, however, that if the pro ration procedures set forth in Section 6.05(d) of the Merger Agreement apply, I agree that my Underwater Options shall be treated as Cash Electing Options, notwithstanding the immediately preceding proviso].2
	 
	3.     	This letter agreement shall terminate and cease to have any effect in the event that the Merger Agreement is terminated prior to the consummation of the Merger.
	 
	4.     	The Company shall have the right to enforce the terms of this letter agreement.
	 


[Signature Page to Follow]

1 Include for Mr. Dahlen only.

2 Include for Messrs. Floyd, Shears and Spizzo.






Very truly yours,

 

___________________________________________



      

Agreed and Acknowledged:

HERCULES INCORPORATED

___________________________________________

Name: 

Title:



ASHLAND INC.

___________________________________________

Name: 

Title:

 

 

[SIGNATURE PAGE TO OPTION TREATMENT SIDE LETTER]