alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. P68/273.

protests 62/9533, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of articles of synthetic rubber similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Horizon Medical Products, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the
Corporation, hereby certifies:

     (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.



/s/ Elaine Swygert
----------------------------------------------------
Elaine Swygert
Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer

December 2, 2003


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Horizon Medical
Products, Inc. and will be retained by Horizon Medical Products, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Fourth Court of **Appeals San Antonio, Texas** 

June 24, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00217

- CV

FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF A.S., a Mentally Ill Person,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015

- MH

- 0851 Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge P residing



### ORDER

In accordance with this court’s May 28, 2015 order , we suspended the appellate deadlines while t he trial court conducted an abandonment hearing . On June 18, 2015, the district clerk filed a supplemental reporter’s record of the hearing

. Appellant’s counsel filed the brief on June 22, 2015.
We REINSTATE the appellate deadlines. The State’s brief is due within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order. See T EX

. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN

. § 574.070(e); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2.

After the State’s brief is filed, this court will advance this appeal on the court’s docket in accordance with the statutory requirements. See T EX

. H EALTH & S AFETY C ODE A NN

. §§ 574.070(e), 574.108.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed t he seal of the said court on this 24th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
No. 47326.

#### Protests 22262-K, etc., of F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported and that no addition should have been made for planing, or tonguing and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
Appendix C Rhodia

PM10 NOx Maximum 24-hr actual Em ission Rate g/s g/s Unit 1 0.05 6.20 Unit 2 0.09 13.38
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAbgenix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

November 5, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/ WILLIAM R. RINGO                  |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | William R. Ringo                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to Abgenix, Inc. and will be retained by Abgenix, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

 

----
**Exhibit 12.1****IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION****COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES**                       Year Ended December 31, (In Thousands) 2007  2006  2005  2004  2003 **Including Interest on Deposits**                                         Earnings:                    Earnings from continuingoperations before incometaxes $(29,183) $56,271  $56,842  $80,216  $(9,462)Fixed charges from below  250,636   242,089   137,121   80,137   80,946                 Earnings from continuingoperations $221,453  $298,360  $193,963  $160,353  $71,484                                      Fixed charges:                    Interest expense $250,636  $242,089  $137,121  $80,137  $80,946                                      Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  0.88         x   1.23        x   1.41        x   2.00        x   0.88        x                                      **Excluding Interest on Deposits**                                         Earnings:                    Earnings from continuingoperations before incometaxes $(29,183) $56,271  $56,842  $80,216  $(9,462)Fixed charges from below  113,276   109,868   53,260   35,650   38,581                 Earnings from continuingoperations $84,093  $166,139  $110,102  $115,866  $29,119                                      Fixed charges:                    Interest expense, excludinginterest on deposits $113,276  $109,868  $53,260  $35,650  $38,581                                      Ratio of earnings to fixed charges  0.74         x   1.51        x   2.07        x   3.25        x   0.75        x
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERT GONZALES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1064 FCD CMK P

vs.

S. PALAGUMMI,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On May 10, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has filed objections

to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-01064-FCD-CMK Document 65 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 10, 2005, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff’s April 11, 2005 motion for judgment is denied;

3. Defendants’ March 25, 2005 motion to dismiss is granted and;

4. Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies.

DATED:June 16, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

/gonz1064.805

Case 2:04-cv-01064-FCD-CMK Document 65 Filed 06/16/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES RECORDS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0944 GEB JFM

vs.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

A settlement conference was held before the undersigned on May 31, 2005. 

Maurice Smith appeared on behalf of plaintiff. Kendall Newman, Assistant United States

Attorney, appeared on behalf of defendant. This case settled. 

In accordance with the provisions of Local Rule 16-160, dispositional documents

are to be filed on or before July 15, 2005.

Discovery and motion practice are stayed; all hearing dates set in this matter are

hereby vacated.

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions

on any and all counsel or parties who contributed to the violation of this order.

DATED: June 1, 2005. 

001; records.045

Case 2:04-cv-00944-GEB -JFM Document 12 Filed 06/01/05 Page 1 of 1
Letter to Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge

From Kenneth Santodomingo 

Dated July 23, 2014

Plus Attachment

Is Located at the FAA Hearing Docket,

600 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20591

Vicki S. Leemon

Mgr., Adjudication Branch, AGC-430

Federal Aviation Administration
# sec5_snc_2022

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-17	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SNC - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2021
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1-SF/7293989.1 1 CIV.S-04-0549 GEB DAD

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO UNSEAL RECORD FOR LIMITED PURPOSE

CECILY A. WATERMAN, State Bar No. 63502 

ERIC MECKLEY, State Bar No. 168181 

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

One Market, Spear Street Tower 

San Francisco, CA 94105-1126 

Tel: 415.442.1000 

Fax: 415.442.1001 

Attorneys for Defendants 

ARAMARK Uniform & Career Apparel, Inc., 

Don Clowes, Will Polifka, Tim Bickerton and Dave 

Koch 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

MICHAEL BAKER, WILLIE ANDREWS, 

RICHARD ELEY and TROY VARGAS, 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER 

APPAREL, INC., DON CLOWES, WILL 

POLIFKA, TIM BICKERTON and DAVE 

KOCH, 

Defendants. 

Case No. CIV.S-04-0549 GEB DAD 

ORDER TO UNSEAL RECORD FOR 

LIMITED PURPOSE

WHEREFORE, at the settlement conference on September 13, 2005, the case settled and 

the terms and conditions of the settlement were placed on the record in open court and ordered 

sealed by the Court. 

As a result of a dispute regarding the terms of the parties’ settlement, Defendants have 

requested a copy of the written transcript of the record made in Court on September 13, 2005. 

FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby orders that the transcript of the 

proceedings on September 13, 2005 be unsealed for the sole and limited purpose of allowing 

Case 2:04-cv-00549-DAD Document 150 Filed 09/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

1-SF/7293989.1 2 CIV.S-04-0549 GEB DAD

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO UNSEAL RECORD FOR LIMITED PURPOSE

Defendants, Plaintiffs and their counsel to review said transcript in order to resolve the parties’ 

dispute regarding the terms of the settlement. The transcript and proceedings will remain sealed 

for all other purposes and as to all other persons. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 30, 2005

Ddad1/orders.civil/baker0549.unseal 

Case 2:04-cv-00549-DAD Document 150 Filed 09/30/05 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 95-40698

Summary Calendar

_______________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROGER CHARLES BOILES,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

(1:95-CR-37)

_________________________________________________________________

February 26, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roger Charles Boiles appeals his conviction for being a

felon in the unlawful possession of a firearm, a violation of 18

U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Boiles maintains that the district court erred

by denying his motion to suppress evidence and by denying his

motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that § 922(g)(1) is

unconstitutional. Our review of the briefs and the record reveals

no reversible error; we AFFIRM.
Exhibit 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual Report of Israel Bank of  Agriculture  Ltd. (the
"Bank") on Form 20-F/A for the period ended  December 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  We, Lea
Patalovsky,  General  Manager  of the Bank,  and Yakov  Cohen,  Chief  Financial
Officer of the Bank,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.

January 12, 2006

Lea Patalovsky
General Manager


/s/ Lea Patalovsky
----------------------


Yakov Cohen
Chief Financial Officer


/s/ Yakov Cohen
----------------------
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 9/15/2023 1

Unsuccessful Attempt 

to Block Electoral College Votes 

Shtino v. Carlin 

(Alexander Williams, Jr., D. Md. 8:00-cv-3699) 

The district court denied a December 21, 2000, pro se complaint to 

enjoin presentation of Florida’s electoral votes. 

Subject: Voting irregularities. Topics: Electoral College; 

enjoining certification; pro se party. 

A pro se plaintiff filed a federal complaint in the District of Maryland on December 21, 2000, to enjoin the Archivist of the United States, whose office is 

in Maryland, from presenting Florida’s Electoral College votes.1

 Judge Alexander Williams, Jr., denied the plaintiff relief that same day.2

Following Congress’s January 6, 2001, certification3

 of the December 18, 

2000, Electoral College vote in favor of George W. Bush,4 Judge Williams 

dismissed the action on January 8.5 Judge Williams denied a motion for reconsideration on February 21.6

1. Docket Sheet, Shtino v. Carlin, No. 8:00-cv-3699 (D. Md. Dec. 21, 2000) (D.E. 1); 

Dismissal Order, id. (Jan. 8, 2001), D.E. 3. 

2. Docket Sheet, supra note 1 (D.E. 3). 

Judge Williams retired on January 3, 2014. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

3. See Alison Mitchell, Over Some Objections, Congress Certifies Electoral Vote, N.Y. 

Times, Jan. 7, 2001, at 17. 

4. See Charles Babington, Electors Reassert Their Role, Wash. Post, Dec. 19, 2000, at A1. 

5. Dismissal Order, supra note 1. 

6. Reconsideration Denial, Shtino, No. 8:00-cv-3699 (D. Md. Feb. 21, 2001), D.E. 6.
No. 67846.

#### IB Bolt Jorgensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 63/6009 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61327.

protest 289953-K (San Francisco).

#### Joseph A. Paredes & Co., a/c Hap Jones *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

At the hearing, it was stipulated “that the involved merchandise was liquidated at a value which included shipping charges in the amount of 107 pounds 18 shillings 10 pence, but that the amount was not included in the appraised value.” It appeared that the error was manifest to the appraising officer, as evidenced by the fact that, in appraising the merchandise, he did not include the nondutiable shipping charges in the appraised value. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and in view of section 503, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1503), as amended, that the final appraised value be used as the *487basis for the assessment of duties on imported merchandise subject to ad valorem rates of duty, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, and the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry using the value as returned by the appraiser.
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-3 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 12 of 12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED 
MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,758,365
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,994,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (318,805)
<INVENTORY>                                  5,313,264
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            12,727,103
<PP&E>                                       2,983,654
<DEPRECIATION>                                (487,039)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,379,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,474,634
<BONDS>                                     24,595,642
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,419
<OTHER-SE>                                     338,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,379,748
<SALES>                                      6,708,869
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,708,869
<CGS>                                        2,533,556
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,533,556
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,962,875
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,942,072
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (718,496)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (209,354)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (927,850)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              1,100,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   172,150
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 4.20  


CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

OF

ONEBEACON U.S. HOLDINGS TRUST III  


        THIS Certificate of Trust of ONEBEACON U.S. HOLDINGS TRUST III (the "Trust") is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a
statutory trust under the Delaware Statutory Trust Act (12 Del. C. §3801 et seq.) (the "Act"). 


        1.     Name.
The name of the statutory trust formed hereby is ONEBEACON U.S. HOLDINGS TRUST III. 


        2.     Delaware
Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the Trust in the State of Delaware are Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, 919 North Market Street,
Suite 1600, Wilmington, Delaware 19801, Attention: Corporate Trust Services. 


        3.     Effective
Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon filing. 


        IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate in accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act. 



	 	 	WELLS FARGO DELAWARE TRUST COMPANY, as Delaware Trustee
	

 	
 	

By:	

/s/  AMY L. MARTIN      

	 	 	Name: Amy L. Martin

Title: Vice President
	

 	
 	

/s/  JANE E. FREEDMAN      
 Name: Jane E. Freedman

Title: Regular Trustee
	

 	
 	

/s/  PAUL H. MCDONOUGH      
 Name: Paul H. McDonough

Title: Regular Trustee
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004



The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Gary C. LoraditchName:

Gary C. LoraditchTitle:

President




By:

/s/ Bonnie M. KleinName:

Bonnie M. KleinTitle:

Vice President and Treasurer




Date: August 12, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                  Exhibit 10.20


Description of Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation Short-Term Incentive Plan
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The Company maintains a broad based short-term incentive plan pursuant
to which participants, including the Named Executive Officers, may earn cash
awards. Awards are determined on a sliding scale based on attainment by the
Company of various levels of financial performance calculated using internal
measures of controllable continuing operating results. Depending on the level
of financial performance, participants may earn up to three times their annual
award target.

         Awards under the plan are paid in the year after they are earned. If a
participant's employment is terminated prior to the end of a plan year as a
result of death, disability or retirement, such participant will be entitled to
receive a pro rated portion of any award earned through the date of his or her
termination of employment. Except as may be provided in a separate agreement
with a participant, awards earned under the program are forfeited if a
participant is terminated for cause prior to payment, or a participant's
employment is terminated prior to the end of a plan year for any reason other
than death, disability or retirement.