alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Follow-Up on February 24, 2010 Meeting Regard ing NPDES Program and Aquatic Pesticide Applications

Steve Via

to:

Allison Wiedeman

04/12/2010 03:47 PM

Cc:
Jack Faulk, Mike Muse, Michael Finn, Willi am Jordan, Erica Brown, 'Mark Rentz'

Show Details

Ms. Wiedeman,

Thank you for the opportunity in Februa ry to talk with you and your staff about the NPDES Program’s approach to pesticide application to, on, or near wa ter of the U.S. Attached is a le tter prepared collaboratively by the

A merican Water Works Association (AWWA), Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA), and the

A ssociation of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA) addressing the questions you posed to us during our meeting on this topic.

A s indicated in our letter, please feel to contact me, Mark Rentz, or Erica Brown if you or your staff has any questions.

Best regards,

Steve Via

Steve Via

Regulatory Affairs Manager



### American Water Works Association

1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 701W
Washington DC 20005

Email: svia@awwa.org

Office: (202) 628

‐ 8303

Direct: (202) 326

‐ 6130

Cell: (703) 915

‐ 4387

Fax: (202) 628

‐ 2846 

### Page 1 of 1

5/12/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\ j faulk\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web8401.htm
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN BOWMAN, an individual; and )

DISABILITY RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT, )

EDUCATION SERVICES: HELPING YOU )

HELP OTHERS, a California public )

benefit corporation, )

) CIV. S-04-755 GEB PAN

Plaintiffs, )

) ORDER

v. )

)

BEST WESTERN STATION HOUSE INN; )

THE WILLIFORD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP, )

L.P., a California limited )

partnership; BEST WESTERN INTER- )

NATIONAL, INC., an Arizona )

corporation and LEWIS T. WILLIFORD,)

an individual dba BEST WESTERN )

STATION HOUSE INN, )

)

Defendants. )

)

The parties indicate that certain discovery was not

conducted before the discovery completion date, which they desire to

conduct, and they request that this action be referenced to the

magistrate judge “for an immediate Settlement Conference.” The

parties’ request to reopen discovery is not supported by good cause. 

Further, the parties’ desire to have up until October 10, 2005, to

Case 2:04-cv-00755-GEB-PAN Document 18 Filed 07/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

conduct specified discovery. However, the final pretrial conference

is scheduled for October 24, 2005, and discovery and any dispute

regarding the same is supposed to be completed before the parties meet

and confer on the content of a joint pretrial statement.

Nevertheless, to accommodate the parties’ joint request to

reopen discovery, the final pretrial conference is rescheduled for

hearing on December 19, 2005, at 1:30 p.m. Discovery shall be

completed by October 11, 2005. 

Since discovery is not complete, the parties’ request for a

settlement conference to be referenced to the magistrate judge is

denied. However, the parties could contact the magistrate judge’s

deputy clerk to ascertain if the magistrate judge is willing to

conduct a settlement conference in this action, even though discovery

is not complete.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 1, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00755-GEB-PAN Document 18 Filed 07/05/05 Page 2 of 2
ACCEPTED

12-14-00321-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

4/7/2015 2:52:05 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 4/7/2015 2:52:05 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
```

[Federal Register: April 5, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 64)]
[Notices]               
[Page 17197]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr05ap10-108]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6940]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Cyprus: Crossroads of Civilizations''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Cyprus: Crossroads of Civilizations,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the 
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, 
Washington, DC, from on or about September 1, 2010, until on or about 
April 15, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: March 26, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-7632 Filed 4-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1537 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 580
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1537

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 
                                the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2017

 Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Franken, Mr. 
Nelson, Mr. Udall, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Carper, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Portman, 
 Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Merkley, and Mr. Markey) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

                           September 18, 2018

              Reported by Mr. Barrasso, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 
                                the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Migratory Birds of the Americas 
Conservation Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION ACT.

    Section 10 of the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 6109) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 10. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act $6,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2019 through 2023.
    ``(b) Use of Funds.--Of the amounts made available under subsection 
(a) for each fiscal year, not less than 75 percent shall be expended 
for projects carried out at a location outside of the United States.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 580

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1537

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 
                                the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 18, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

M2M SOLUTIONS LLC, Appellant

v.

AMAZON.COM, INC., Appellee

______________________

2019

- 2246, 2019

- 2247, 2019

- 2248

______________________

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No s . IPR2017

- 01891, IPR2017

- 01892, IPR2017

- 01893.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

M ARC N. H ENSCHKE , Cantor Colburn LLP, Hartford, CT, argued for appellant. Also represented by A NDREW C.

R YAN

.

C HRISTINA J ORDAN M C C ULLOUGH , Perkins Coie, LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for appellee. Also represented by

D ANIEL T. S HVODIAN , Palo Alto, CA.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is Case: 19-2246 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2020O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN

, L INN

, and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 11, 2020

Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court Case: 19-2246 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 09/11/2020
-  Home 
          -  Training 
          -  Locations 
          -  Resources 
          -  Careers & Internships 
          -  News 
          -  About 

# Basic Incident Response to Digital Evidence

Home » Training

Glynco, GA

Artesia, NM

Cheltenham, MD

### Description

The Basic Incident Response to Digital Evidence (BIRDE) provides training necessary to any criminal investigator who may be a first responder in a situation in which computer based evidence is or may be recovered. While not being overwhelmingly technical in delivery, this program provides a sufficient overview of technology in order to adequately prepare the criminal investigator for taking proper steps necessary to identify, collect, acquire, and preserve digital evidence during the conduct of an investigation.

### Prerequisites

Applicant must be a law enforcement officer/agent with arrest authority in the prevention, detection, apprehension, detention and/or investigation of felony and/or misdemeanor violations of federal, state, local, tribal, or military criminal laws; Direct Law Enforcement Support Personnel (DLESP); or Employees of a federal, state, local, tribal or international agency who perform functions directly related to a law enforcement or Department of Homeland Security (DHS) mission but do not necessarily have the authority to carry and use firearms, make arrests and/or conduct searches with or without a warrant. This category of personnel may also include military personnel preparing for deployment. This is an entry-level course. However, a functional knowledge of computers is recommended.

This program is part of the FLETC's Cybercrime Track (FCT) or the Electronic Surveillance (ELSUR) Track. By entering FCT or ELSUR into the search window, other related Cyber Division programs can be found.

### Required Training Materials

None.

### Program Syllabus/Curriculum

                        - Electronic Law and Evidence
                        - Cell Phone Investigations
                        - First Responders to Digital Evidence
                        - Data Acquisition

### Program Contact Info

**Glynco:** (912)267-3447 **Cheltenham:** (301) 877-8430**State and Local:** (912) 261-4566

### Program Registration

              - Federal organization personnel should contact their agency training officer to register for training or  Contact FLETC Admissions  with any additional questions.
              - State, local and tribal officers requesting training should  register online . If organizational support is required or you have additional needs, please  Contact FLETC Admissions .
              - International (non-US) personnel should email  FLETC-intlrqst@fletc.dhs.gov .
<PAGE>


Exhibit 21.1
------------

                               IIC INDUSTRIES INC.
                               ------------------

                              List of Subsidiaries
                              --------------------


Israel Tractor and Equipment Co. Ltd. (Israel)
              Ambache  Engineering, Ltd. (Israel)

Investor Rt. (Hungary)
              Interag Rt. (Hungary)
              Agrimpex Rt. (Hungary)
              Agrimpex International Ltd. (UK)
              Agrimill Rt. (Hungary)
              Viktoria Rt. (Hungary)
              Boma Kft. (Hungary)

Interag Rt. (Hungary)
              Kompakt Auto Kft.
              Interag Autohaz Kft.
              Motor Pedo, Kft.
              Frigoland Kft.
              H.H.H. Udvarhaz Kft.

Balton C.P. Limited (England)
              Amiran Zambia Ltd. (Zambia)
              Telkor Communications Systems, Ltd. (Zambia)
              Ghana Smartcomm Ltd. (Ghana)
              Bamiri Limited (Kenya)
              Amiran Communications, Ltd. (Kenya)
              Dizengoff Ghana Ltd. (Ghana)
              Amiran Kenya Ltd. (Kenya)
              Balton Tanzania  Ltd. (Tanzania)
              Balton BV-DWA (Nigeria) Ltd.  (Nigeria)
              Balton (U) Ltd. Uganda (Uganda)
              Dizengoff (WA) Nigeria Limited (Nigeria)
              Balton SNES S.A. (Ivory Coast)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

ENVIRONMENTAL PROT. INF. CTR.,

et al.,

NO. CIV. S-04-1027 WBS GGH

Plaintiffs, 

v. ORDER RE: COSTS

BLACKWELL, et al.,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

On May 5, 2005, the court entered final judgment in

favor of plaintiffs in this case. Plaintiffs have submitted a

cost bill totaling $491.40. Defendants do not object.

Rule 54(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

and Local Rule 54-292(f) govern the taxation of costs to losing

parties, subject to limits set under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. See 28

U.S.C. § 1920 (enumerating taxable costs); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(d)(1) (“costs other than attorneys’ fees shall be allowed as

of course to the prevailing party unless the court otherwise

directs . . . .”); L.R. 54-292(f); Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T.

Gibbons, 482 U.S. 437, 441 (1987) (limiting taxable costs to

those enumerated in 28 U.S.C. § 1920). The district court has

Case 2:04-cv-01027-WBS-GGH Document 29 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

discretion to determine what constitutes a taxable cost within

the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Amarel v. Connell, 102 F.3d

1494, 1523 (9th Cir. 1997); Alflex Corp. v. Underwriters’ Lab.,

Inc., 914 F.2d 175, 177 (9th Cir. 1990). The losing party has

the burden of overcoming the presumption in favor of awarding

costs to the prevailing party. See Russian River Watershed

Protection Comm. v. City of Santa Rosa, 142 F.3d 1136, 1144 (9th

Cir. 1998); Amarel, 102 F.3d at 1523.

After reviewing the bill, the court finds all costs to

be reasonable. Accordingly, costs of $491.40 will be allowed.

 IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: June 17, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-01027-WBS-GGH Document 29 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Griffon Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald J. Kramer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Douglas J. Wetmore,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of their knowledge:

/s/ RONALD J. KRAMERName: Ronald J. Kramer
Title:Chief Executive Officer
         (Principal Executive Officer)Date: November 24, 2009/s/ DOUGLAS J. WETMOREName: Douglas J. Wetmore
Title:Chief Financial Officer
         (Principal Financial Officer)Date: November 24, 2009


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Griffon Corporation and will be retained by Griffon Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [Project No. 12580-001] 

                    Take notice that Shenango Dam Hydroelectric Company, LLC, permittee for the proposed Shenango Dam Project, has requested that its preliminary permit be terminated. The permit was issued on August 18, 2005, and would have expired on July 31, 2008.[1]                                          The project would have been located on the Shenango River in Mercer County, Pennsylvania.                 

The permittee filed the request on February 6, 2007, and the preliminary permit for Project No. 12580 shall remain in effect through the thirtieth day after issuance of this notice unless that day is a Saturday, Sunday, part-day holiday that affects the Commission, or legal holiday as described in section 18 CFR 385.2007, in which case the effective date is the first business day following that day. New applications involving this project site, to the extent provided for under 18 CFR Part 4, may be filed on the next business day. 

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             112 FERC ¶62,154.                     
        Back to Citation      

 [FR Doc. E7-3217 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONPursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Strategic Internet
Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending
December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"). I, Ralph Shearing, Chief Executive Officer of the
company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Date: | April 11, 2007 |  | /s/ Ralph Shearing           
|----- | -------------- |  | -----------------------------
|      |                |  | Ralph Shearing, CEO, Director

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM KUNEMAN and

BILLIE CLAIRE KUNEMAN,

Plaintiffs, No. CIV S-04-0927 LKK DAD PS

vs.

CALIFORNIA WATER SERVICE,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On December 16, 2004, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Defendant has

filed objections to the findings and recommendations and plaintiffs have filed a reply.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00927-LKK-DAD Document 67 Filed 05/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 16, 2004, are adopted in

full; 

2. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ federal Safe Drinking Water Act

(“SDWA”) cause of action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is denied;

3. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ SDWA cause of action for failure to

state a claim is denied; and

4. Defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ state law cause of action for

conspiracy for failure to state a cognizable claim is granted.

DATED: May 19, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/kuneman0927.jo

Case 2:04-cv-00927-LKK-DAD Document 67 Filed 05/20/05 Page 2 of 2