alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM MARCH 31,
1999 10Q 1ST QTR. AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      12,862,603              16,169,749
<SECURITIES>                                 4,584,333               2,824,417
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,176,773               6,775,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                   427,714                 341,942
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,192,277              26,364,207
<PP&E>                                       3,941,697               3,852,245
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,777,521               1,569,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,206,384              35,647,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,962,013               5,192,345
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        34,818                  34,818
<OTHER-SE>                                     312,313                 315,883
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,206,384              35,647,691
<SALES>                                      6,932,411              35,214,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,932,411              35,214,586
<CGS>                                        5,366,725              24,527,627
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,366,725              24,527,627
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,048,855              13,725,527
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,256)                (40,536)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,214,545)             (2,084,846)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                 317,589
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,214,545)             (1,767,257)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,214,545)             (1,767,257)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.16)                   (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.16)                   (.29)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       147,584,051
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   2,607,818
<MORTGAGE>                                  13,881,835
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  212,843
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             174,990,393
<CASH>                                       2,647,566
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             158,314
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      27,921,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             227,139,628
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            171,094,370
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          9,282,242
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,594,541
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,948,683
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,441,718
<OTHER-SE>                                  36,230,310
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               227,139,628
<PREMIUMS>                                  36,354,025
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         11,653,732
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (489,685)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 261,524
<BENEFITS>                                  19,134,559
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    764,528
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        26,324,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,555,574
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (46,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,601,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,601,574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY BARBARIN,

Petitioner,

v.

A.K. SCRIBNER, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV S-04-0894 RRB KJM P

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that respondent may have until

December 12, 2005, to file its answer to the petition for writ of habeas corpus. If the response to the

habeas petition is an answer, petitioner’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days

after service of the answer. If the response to the habeas petition is a motion, petitioner’s opposition

or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within thirty days after service

of the motion, and respondent’s reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fifteen days thereafter.

DATED: November 30, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00894-MDS Document 29 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4242 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4242

To extend the authorization of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought 
              Relief Act of 1991, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 2, 2024

 Mr. Hickenlooper (for himself, Ms. Lummis, and Mr. Wyden) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the authorization of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought 
              Relief Act of 1991, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Drought Preparedness Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Drought Program.--Section 104(c) of the Reclamation States 
Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) is amended by 
striking ``2022'' and inserting ``2028''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 301 of the 
Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 
2241) is amended by striking ``2022'' and inserting ``2028''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 60037.

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

protests 234424-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef or veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
|Exhibit 99.1


CERTIFICATION


The
undersigned certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(1) | The
accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30,
          2002, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | The
information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
          Company.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Date: December 10,
        2002
        
      
      Date: December 10, 2002
         |  | /s/ William P. Murnane
        
        President and
        Chief Executive Officer
      /s/ Thomas Paulson
        
        Chief Financial Officer
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|-18-
|----
14.01 Approve or Return a Deposit to Draft
CMF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0246

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ZANE AARON TENOLD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time 

to and including June 17, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 12 2020

05/12/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0246
EXHIBIT 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

Solely for the purposes of
complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Jilco Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB of the
Company for the quarter ended July 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 30, 2008                                     
|                                                           
|/s/ MARTHA
KRETZMER                                        
|Martha Kretzmer                                            
|Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
No. 59480.

protests 186527-K, etc. (New York).

#### Regal Accessories, Inc., and Dunlap Alpers and Mott, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
ra.v,v

' ■ eft 

# -■' ,\ \--^® ■/ ' f ^

# 0 BEXAR COUNTY JUDICIAL DISTRICT JUSTICE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS 300 Dolorosa #3200 

### San Antonio, TX 78205

: r CARLOS ANTONIO RAYMOND Appellant VS MARTIN JOSEPH ROY, PIZZA VENTURE OF SAN ANTONIO, LLC Appellee TRIAL CASE# 2015-CV-00935 APPEAL # 04-17-00061-CV

DATE: OCTOBER 30, 2017 MOTION TO CORRECT OR MODIFY THE RECORD PURUANT TO APPELLATE RULE 10(e) 

### Appellant, CarlosAntonio Raymond, prose, hereby movesthis Courtto correctthe record. In support ofthis motion, Appellant RAYMOND states as follows: 

### 1. In bothAppellant's AMENDEDAND REPLY BRIEFF, Appellant made reference tothe onlywitness secured and called by Pizza Venture attrial. Appellant referred to such witness as MARTHA LONSTON, and the record should be corrected to read, Ms. ANDREA STARKS, Pizza venture Operations Assistant. 

### 2. To recap previous points ofargument. Pizza Venturefailed to adequately and sufficiently address the relevanttestimony of Ms. Andrea Starks and the evidentiary Papa John's Pizza DUTY ROSTERS in its brief. This Duty Rosterwas admitted into evidence and is believed to be fabricated (made) up to deceive the jury. 

### 3. All along and throughoutthe pre-trial and discovery proceedings, Pizza Venture adamantly and vehemently insisted and asserted that MARTIN JOSEPH ROYwas " not scheduletowork on the day ofthe accident. Ms. Andrea Starks' testified to a DUTY ROSTER that was admitted into evidence on the day of trial. She also testified that MARTIN JOSEPH ROY was not "listed on such duty roster, thus he was not scheduled to work on the day ofthe accident." 4. Now, in complete contradiction. Pizza Venture has now briefed," The driver ofthe other vehicle, Roy, was apparently on his wayto hisjob at a Papa John's pizza restaurant owned byAppellant Pizza Venture, where Roy worked as a pizza delivery person.
1

Ogulei, David

From: Dennis J Warchol <dennis.warchol@veoliaes.com>

Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 8:36 AM

To: Ogulei, David

Subject: Title V Permit Application

Nancy Paddock will be giving you are call this morning between 10:30 AM and 11 AM to discuss you questions. I think 

we have them all figured out. Are you available or is a better time. Thanks 

SERVICE FIRST SAFETY ALWAYS 

Dennis J. Warchol 

EHS Manager 

Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. 

Trade Waste Incineration Facility 

#7 Mobile Avenue 

Sauget, IL 62201 

618-271-2804 (ext.169) 

618-271-2128 (fax) 

Dennis.warchol@VeoliaES.com

www.VeoliaES.com

This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Solutions, LLC is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may 

contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If 

you are not the intended recipient, please communicate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the 

original message and delete it from all computers.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE ) 2:04-cv-0836-GEB-JFM

COMPANY OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) ORDER

)

v. )

)

MBA CONSTRUCTION, et al. )

)

Defendants. )

 )

On August 11, 2005, the Court issued an Order denying

Plaintiff’s application for a temporary restraining order and

Plaintiff’s request to shorten time on its Application for Right to

Attach Order and Order for Issuance of Writ of Attachment. 

On August 23, 2005, Plaintiff filed a Request for Hearing or

Adjudication on Plaintiff’s Application for Right to Attach Order and

Order for Issuance of Writ of Attachment, in which Plaintiff states

that the Court “did not appear to enter a ruling on the merits of

Plaintiff’s application . . . and did not specify whether a hearing

would be held by the Court on this matter.” Plaintiff requests that

the Court set a hearing on Plaintiff’s Application. However, if

Case 2:04-cv-00836-GEB -JFM Document 69 Filed 08/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Plaintiff seeks a hearing on its Application, it must comply with the

procedures set forth in the Local Rules.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 23, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00836-GEB -JFM Document 69 Filed 08/24/05 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 21





                           SUBSIDIARIES OF IBP, inc.            
                              December 28, 1996

                         IBP Foreign Sales Corporation          
                           IBP Hog Markets, Inc.*                          
                           IBP International, Inc.
                         IBP International, Inc. Asia** 
                        IBP International, Inc. Europe**
                            IBP of Wisconsin, inc.   
                           IBP Service Center Corp.
                         Lakeside Farm Industries Ltd.                       
                           Lakeside Packers Ltd. ***
                                 PBX, inc.
                             Prepared Foods, Inc.      
                       Rural Energy Systems, Inc.                     
                      Southern Beef Processors, Inc.
                       Supreme Processed Foods, Inc.
                             Texas Transfer, Inc.

                            _______________________             
             * Also doing business as Heinold Hog Market

            ** Stock is 100% owned by IBP International, Inc.

           *** Stock is 100% owned by Lakeside Farm Industries Ltd.
Case No. 7,867.

#### KLEIN v. KLOMAN.

[See Case No. 7,808.]
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:     (i)the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for theperiod ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.          Dated:January 10, 2007 /s/ Mark A. Richman          Mark A. Richman    Chief Financial Officer and
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 13, 2002


/s/ LEO LIEBOWITZ
-----------------------------------------
Leo Liebowitz
President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
# C_2017424EN.01001001.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/10

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias — Greece) — Ypourgos Esoterikon, Ypourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton v Maria-Eleni Kalliri

(Case C-409/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 76/207/EEC - Equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation - Discrimination on the ground of sex - Competition for entry to the police school of a Member State - Law of that state imposing a minimum physical height requirement on all candidates for admission to that competition))

(2017/C 424/13)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikrateias

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Ypourgos Esoterikon, Ypourgos Ethnikis Pedias kai Thriskevmaton

Appellants:

Defendant: Maria-Eleni Kalliri

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The provisions of Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions, as amended by Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002, must be interpreted as precluding a law of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes candidates’ admission to the competition for entry to the police school of that Member State subject, whatever their sex, to a requirement that they are of a physical height of at least 1,70 m, since that law works to the disadvantage of a far greater number of women compared with men and that law does not appear to be either appropriate or necessary to achieve the legitimate objective that it pursues, which it is for the national court to determine.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23.1




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
registration statements and related prospectuses filed by
Mallinckrodt Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933 of our report
dated July 30, 1997 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Mallinckrodt Inc. included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1997:


                       Commission File No.
                   ---------------------------

                     Form S-8, No.   2-65727
                     Form S-8, No.   2-70868
                     Form S-8, No.   2-80553
                     Form S-8, No.   2-90910
                     Form S-8, No.   2-94151
                     Form S-8, No.  33-10381
                     Form S-8, No.  33-32109
                     Form S-8, No.  33-40246
                     Form S-3, No.  33-43925
                     Form S-3, No.  33-47081
                     Form S-3, No.  33-57821
                     Form S-8, No. 333-34489



----------------------
Ernst & Young LLP



St. Louis, Missouri
September 22, 1997
No. 48489.

#### Protests 73723-K, etc., of Accident & Casualty Ins. Co. of Winterthur et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# sec5_custodialact_2023

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCA - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2022