alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Phillips *v.*Byrne et al., Appellants.

*Negligence*— Automobiles—Rear *end collision*— Case *for jury.*

In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained in a collision between automobiles, the case is for the jury and a verdict will be sustained, where the issue is one of fact as to the actual circumstances of the accident, and the case was submitted in a charge which was free from error.

Argued October 16, 1924.

Appeal, No. 54, Oct. T., 1924, by defendants, from judgment of Municipal Court, *217Phila. Co., June T., 1923, No. 469, on verdict for the plaintiff in the case of Herman Phillips v. Joseph T. Byrne, Jr., and John J. Grelis, Executors of the Estate of Joseph T. Byrne, deceased.

Before Orlady, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

Trespass to recover damages for personal injuries. Before Knowles, J.

From the record it appeared that the defendant was injured in a rear end collision of two automobiles proceeding in the same direction on Thirty-Third Street in the City of Philadelphia.

Verdict for the plaintiff in the sum of $300 and judgment thereon. Defendants appealed.

*Error assigned*was the refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

*Jay B. Leopold,*and with him *Russell Duane,*for appellants.

*George C. Klauder,*for appellee.

December 13, 1924:

Per Curiam,

The plaintiff’s right to recover in this case depended on the sufficiency of the proof he adduced in support of his allegation that the defendant was negligent. He assumed the burden of establishing this, and after a number of eye-witnesses testified to the essential facts of the case, the court below, in a charge that is free from reversible error submitted the question to the jury. The only point presented for instruction was that under the evidence the verdict should be for the defendant. This was refused, and after due consideration the jury returned a verdict in the plaintiff’s favor.

We see no reversible error in the trial, and the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 12.3

WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS

|                                                    | Years Ended Dec. 31, 
|--------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
|                                                    |                      
|                                                    | 2008                 
|                                                    |                      
|                                                    | (dollars in millions)
|EARNINGS:                                           |                      
|Net income                                          |                      
|Income taxes (a)                                    |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Income before income taxes                          |                      
|Fixed charges as defined                            |                      
|Adjustment for undistributed equity earnings        |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Total earnings as defined                           |                      
|                                                    |                      
|FIXED CHARGES:                                      |                      
|Interest expense                                    |                      
|Estimated interest component of rent expense        |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Total fixed charges as defined                      |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                  |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Preferred dividend requirements (pre-tax basis) (b) |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Fixed charges and preferred dividend requirements   |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and     |                      
|Preferred Dividend Requirements                     |                      
|                                                    |                      

(a) Includes net interest related to
unrecognized tax benefits.

(b) Preferred dividend requirements
(pre-tax basis) are computed by dividing the preferred dividend requirements by one
hundred percent minus the respective annual effective income tax rate.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The X-Change  Corporation,  Inc. on Form
10-KSB for the year ending  December 31, 2004, as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, , Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

(1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


/S/ Charles Stidham
Charles Stidham
C.E.O., President, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)


April 13, 2005

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.
The foregoing  certifications  are  accompanying the Company's Form 10-KSB soley
pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section  1350,  chapter 63 of title 18,  United  States  Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
### Geomorphic Effects of Overflow Dams on the Lower Neosho River, Kansas

By: Kyle E. Juracek**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wri994147

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (1.72 MB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

**For additional information, contact:**
Director, Kansas Water Science CenterU.S. Geological Survey1217 Biltmore DriveLawrence, KS 66049

The purpose of this report is to characterize the geomorphic (channel-changing) effects of overflow dams on the lower Neosho River channel in southeastern Kansas. Specifically, the report describes the types, upstream and downstream extents, and stability of the geomorphic effects in relation to site-specific, human-caused and natural conditions that may affect the channel’s response to the overflow dams.

#### Suggested Citation

Juracek, K.E., 1999, Geomorphic effects of overflow dams on the lower Neosho River, Kansas: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99–4147, 6 p., https://doi.org/10.3133/wri994147.

#### Table of Contents

- Introduction
- Description of Study Area
- Methods
- Geomorphic Effects
- Conclusions
- Acknowledgments
- References

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Welwind Energy International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Tammy-Lynn McNabb, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ 
      Tammy Lynn McNabbTammy
      Lynn McNabb
                Principal
      Executive Officer
                May
      20, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY ESKRIDGE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0865 LKK GGH P

vs.

A. CORREA, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 25, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00865-LKK -GGH Document 26 Filed 08/11/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 25, 2005 are adopted in full; 

2. The motion to dismiss filed December 1, 2004, on grounds that the claims

against defendants Surges are not administratively exhausted is denied; and

3. The motion to dismiss filed February 8, 2005, on grounds that the claims

against defendant Elsberry are not administratively exhausted is denied.

DATED: August 10, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/eskr0865.801

Case 2:04-cv-00865-LKK -GGH Document 26 Filed 08/11/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12.2

INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES
    AND PREFERRED DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS

|                                                    | Years Ended Dec. 31, 
|--------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
|                                                    |                      
|                                                    | 2006                 
|                                                    |                      
|                                                    | (dollars in millions)
|                                                    |                      
|EARNINGS:                                           |                      
|Net income                                          |                      
|Income taxes                                        |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Income before income taxes                          |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Fixed charges as defined                            |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Total earnings as defined                           |                      
|                                                    |                      
|                                                    |                      
|FIXED CHARGES:                                      |                      
|Interest expense                                    |                      
|Estimated interest component of rent expense        |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Total fixed charges as defined                      |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                  | 4.30                 
|                                                    |                      
|Preferred dividend requirements (pre-tax basis) (a) |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Fixed charges and preferred dividend requirements   |                      
|                                                    |                      
|Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and     |                      
|Preferred Dividend Requirements                     | 3.32                 
|                                                    |                      

(a) Preferred dividend requirements
(pre-tax basis) are computed by dividing the preferred dividend requirements by one
hundred percent minus the respective annual effective income tax rate.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1225 LKK GGHP 

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, et al.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On April 25, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion to stay the summary judgment motions,

now pending before the district court, so that he may conduct further discovery. Discovery

closed on October 21, 2005. Accordingly, the court construes plaintiff’s motion as request to reopen discovery. After reviewing the record, the court finds no good cause to re-open discovery.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s April 25, 2006, motion

to stay the summary judgment motions, construed as a request to re-open discovery, is denied.

DATED: 5/5/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

wo1225.dis

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 93 Filed 05/05/06 Page 1 of 1
# THompS ON ATLANTA CLEVELAND 

# _ 

# H I N E CINCINNATI COLUMBUS DAYTON WASHINGTON, D.C. NEW YORK

February 6, 2015 

### Via Regulations.gov and via e-mail —Jake.Troutman@,faa.gov Jake J. Troutman Program Analyst / Rulemaking Federal Aviaton Administration Office of Aviation Safety Airmen and Airspace Rules Division 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Re: Docket No. FAA-2014-0838, Southern Company Services, Inc.'s Section 333 Petition for an Exemption Dear Mr. Troutman, This letter is in response to your letter dated January 26, 2015, in which the Federal Aviation Administration requests additional information concerning Southern Company Services, Inc.'s ("Southern") section 333 petition for an exemption ("Petition") in the docket referenced above. As set forth below, Southern addresses each request in your letter: Reguest No. 1

• Your petition references the material listed below, however the material was not submitted for the record. Please provide a copy of the following referenced materials:

o SkyRanger User Guide, or aircraft manual (ref. in petition on page #26) Southern submitted a confidential copy of Aeryon's SkyRanger User Guide on January 27, 2015 and posted a notice of the submission in the docket via Regulations.gov on that same date. As noted in the letter of enclosure that accompanied the user guide, Aeryon does not share the user guide with the public and treats it as a confidential document. The copy provided to the Federal Aviation Administration is marked "CONFIDENTIAL" and Southern has requested that the FAA not share the document with the public. Reguest No. 2

• Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action taken in the aircraft record. Examples of processes include (1) the petitioner has elected to use its own process to maintain its UAS and ensure that only airworthy and safe

Brent.Connor@ThompsonHine.com Fax: (202) 331-8330 Phone: (202) 263-4188 279710.1
THOMPSON HINE LLP 1919 M Street, N.W. www.ThompsonHine.com ATTORNEYSAT LP.W Suite 700 Phone: 202.331.8800 Washington, D.C. 20036-3537 Fax: 202.331.8330

# THO I

NPE ON 

# H

Jake J. Troutman February 6, 2015 Page 2 UAS will be allowed to operate in the NAS and (2) the petitioner has elected to maintain its UAS in accordance with the manufacturer maintenance and inspection recommendations. Southern has elected to maintain the Aeryon SkyRanger in accordance with Aeryon's maintenance and inspection recommendations as set forth in the SkyRanger User Guide referenced above. Southern notes that maintenance and inspections are covered in Chapter 8 of the guide and that additional inspections are described in Chapter 2. Please feel free to contact us with any questions or if any additional information is required. Very truly yours,
I ~

.: 

### G. Brent Connor Jason Tutrone

cc: James Williams Robert Pappas
[J-73-2024] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT T. LEE ROUSE, : No. 6 WAP 2024 Appellant
V. KIMBERLY ROSENBERG AND HOWARD ROSENBERG, HER HUSBAND AND MARTHA LAUX, Appellees ORDER Appeal from the Order ofthe Superior Court entered May 15, 2023, at No. 828 WDA 2022

PER CURIAM AND NOW, this26th dayofSeptember, 2024, the appeal is DISMISSED as having been improvidentlygranted. Oral argument scheduled for October 10, 2024, is cancelled. Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision ofthis matter.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 

REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 

SPECTER & WILLOUGHBY, LLP 

Ronald C. Specter (SBN 118417) 

4675 MacArthur Court, Suite 1150 

Newport Beach, California 92660 

Telephone: (949) 833-9400 

Facsimile: (949) 833-9425 

DEWEY BALLANTINE LLP 

Matthew M. Walsh (SBN 175004) 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, California 90071-1530 

Telephone: (213) 621-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 621-6100 

Attorneys for defendant 

CIRCLE K STORES, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DIVISION OF CALIFORNIA 

VICKI WEST and WENDY FEGUNDES, 

individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated, 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

CIRCLE K STORES, INC., a foreign 

corporation, 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. CIV. S-04-0438 WBS (GGH) 

REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF 

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 

Judge: Hon. William B. Shubb 

Courtroom No. 5 

First Amended Complaint Filed: July 18, 2005

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-00438-WBS-GGH Document 46 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2 

REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 

Defendant Circle K Stores, Inc. hereby requests the Court to approve the 

substitution of Matthew M. Walsh of Dewey Ballantine LLP as attorneys of record in place of 

Specter & Willoughby, LLP pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(g). Mr. Walsh’s contact information 

is: 

Matthew M. Walsh 

Dewey Ballantine LLP 

333 South Grand Avenue 

Los Angeles, California 90071-1530 

Telephone: (213) 621-6000 

Facsimile: (213) 621-6100 

mwalsh@deweyballantine.com

I consent to this substitution. 

Dated November 7, 2005 _____________/s/______________________ 

Lynn Westerfield, Authorized Representative of 

Circle K Stores, Inc.

I consent to this substitution. 

Dated November 4, 2005 _____________/s/______________________ 

 Ronald C. Specter, Specter & Willoughby, LLP, 

 Withdrawing Attorneys 

 I have given proper notice pursuant to Local Rule 83-182(a)(2)(iv) and consent to 

this substitution. 

Dated November 3, 2005 _____________/s/______________________ 

 Matthew M. Walsh, Dewey Ballantine LLP, 

 Substituting Attorneys 

 ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: November 18, 2005 

226508 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 2:04-cv-00438-WBS-GGH Document 46 Filed 11/21/05 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

February 7, 1950

No. 54010.

#### International Harvest Hat Co. *v.*United States,

protest 938202-G (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

At the trial plaintiff’s witness, referring to a sample of the involved merchandise testified that: "This hat is not bleached, supposedly not. * * * X Q. You don’t know whether it is bleached or not then? — A. No. I wasn’t there.” The testimony adduced from the one witness called for the defendant tended to support the classification made by the collector. Upon an examination of the record the court was satisfied that the plaintiff failed to establish a *'prima facie*case. The protest was therefore overruled.
# sec5_sbr_2024

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2024-01	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout November 29, 2023