alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS R. ELLINGTON, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0666 DFL KJM P

vs.

E.S. ALAMEIDA, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. On October 28, 2005, plaintiff filed a “Declaration of Plaintiff in Support of Motions

and Amended Complaint.” To the extent plaintiff is attempting to bolster the showing in support

of his June 27, 2005 motion for injunctive relief, the matter is moot, for the court issued an order

addressing this motion on October 24, 2005.

In its order of November 19, 2004, the court informed plaintiff that his amended

complaint must be complete within itself. See Local Rule 15-220. To the extent that plaintiff is

attempting to amend his first amended complaint, his attempt is inconsistent with the local rule. 

Accordingly, the court will take no action on plaintiff’s October 28, 2005 declaration.

On November 7, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for the entry of default for

defendants’ failure to respond to the court’s order of August 15, 2005, which gave defendants

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 57 Filed 12/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Runnels and Rohlfing the opportunity to respond to plaintiff’s request for injunctive relief. 

Because the court did not order Runnels and Rohlfing to respond, their failure to do so is not a

basis for any type of sanction. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff’s October 28, 2005 declaration is disregarded; and

2. Plaintiff’s November 7, 2005 motion for the entry of default is denied. 

DATED: December 23, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

elli0666.mm

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 57 Filed 12/27/05 Page 2 of 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SYLVIA JAMES

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILIES

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 1482

[ May 5, 2022 ]

Appeal from the State of Florida, Department of Children and Families ;

L.T. Case No. 19

- 077CF

.

Sylvia James, Belle Glade, pro se

.

Jean A. Costa of the Florida Department of Children and Families

, Fort Lauderdale , for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, G ERBER and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40368 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RONALD ZUR BURLING, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CR-30-01

- - - - - - - - - - February 21, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ronald Zur Burling pleaded guilty to one count of aiding and abetting wire fraud through a check kiting scheme. On appeal, Burling argues that the district court erred in holding him accountable for $149,170 in the check-kiting scheme. The guideline applicable to cases involving fraud is § 2F1.1. The amount of loss under § 2F1.1(b) is based on a defendant’s relevant conduct, which in the case of a jointly undertaken criminal activity, whether charged as a conspiracy or not,No. 96-40368 - 2 - includes “all reasonably foreseeable acts and omissions of others in furtherance of jointly undertaken criminal activity.” § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B). In determining what amount was reasonably foreseeable to a particular defendant, the court should consider the defendant’s relationship role in the conspiracy and his relationship with the coconspirators. United States v. Scurlock , 52 F.3d 531, 539-40 (5th Cir. 1995). From the evidence presented at the sentencing hearing, the district court found that Burling knew that Small kited checks as part of his regular business operations, that Burling had participated in such schemes personally, and that Burling actively and passively misled the individuals cashing Small’s checks. These findings are not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Wimbish , 980 F.2d 312, 313 (5th Cir. 1992), cert. denied , 508 U.S. 919(1993).
AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 31.2****Section 302 Certifications**I, George DeCourcy, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on form 10-KSB of the X- Change Corporation, Inc. (the“Company”).2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport.3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in exchange act rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; andc) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.   Date: April 10, 2008   /s/ George DeCourcy   Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-8 (Nos.  33-14194,  33-5814,  33-2092,  2-72936,  2-82780,
2-64255, 33-41598, 33-54293, 33-59051, 333-05225, 333-29135, 33-54400, 333-39684
and  333-98139)  of Ionics,  Incorporated  of our report  dated March 26,  2003,
relating to the financial  statements and financial  statement  schedule,  which
appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
-----------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 31, 2003
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

Glenn T. Mason,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. S 04-1123 FCD PAN P

vs. Order on Request for Counsel

M. Sandham, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoJuly 14, 2005, plaintiff requested appointment of counsel. 

His request is denied for reasons explained in the court’s March

17, 2005, order.

So ordered.

Dated: July 28, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01123-FCD-EFB Document 35 Filed 07/29/05 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

   Dated: May 9, 2005           BY: /s/ Leo Liebowitz
                                    -----------------
                                       (Signature)
                                    LEO LIEBOWITZ
                                     Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

      The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.
Revised 08/2023

Shared Accounting Module (SAM)

Data Download User Authorization Form

The User listed is designated to perform the Role and Organization(s) responsibilities in the Shared Accounting Module (SAM) in 

accordance with the SAM Security Matrix. 

Section 1 – General Information

 Create New User

 Modify User Information (only applies to role, last name, e-mail address, phone number and/or address)

 Delete User

Add Remove Role 

Data Download (Access to the SAM Home Page and the ability to download lists of Agency Location Codes.)

Section 2 – Agency Location Code and Organization Information

• Specific to this request form, all of the roles above are provisioned at the “All ALCs” level.

Section 3 – User Profile 

User’s Employer/Agency/Bureau

User’s Name (Full name)

User’s E-mail Address 

Phone Number (Direct number to user)

Street Address (User location)

Street Address Line 2 (User location)

City / State / Zip (User location)

Section 4 – Authorized Signature By signing below, the individual certifies that he/she is duly authorized by the organization to 

designate individuals who can serve as a Shared Accounting Module (SAM) user. The authorized individual will be contacted and must confirm 

signature before request can be completed. The authorized individual signing this form cannot be designated as the user on this form.

Name (print) Signature

Title Phone ( ) - Date / /

Email Address

Please email the completed form to the SAM Treasury Support Center: SAM_TSC@stls.frb.org
No. 61333.

protests 140924-K, etc. (New York).

#### S. Farber & Sons et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fox skins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388) or *Sam Forwand Co.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 232, C. D. 1829), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold"VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2018
# Texas Conservation Alliance 

# W i I&L,IZi4cfr Serving Texas Conservation For More Than 40 Years

Testimony on the Proposed EPA Rule Regarding Carbon Emissions By Mack Turner, Chairman July 29, 2014
Each generation faces environmental challenges — over the past century we've limited clear cutting, cleaned up polluted lakes, protected endangered species, and taught people about recycling. Today we face an environmental challenge of global proportions. Climate change affects every aspect of our lives — human health, the health of our economy, the health of the terrestrial and marine ecosystems essential for human existence. The EPA rule has been carefully crafted with input from industry, state governments, public health advocates, wildlife and sporting interests -- a wide range of people — to limit the amount of carbon being added to the atmosphere while giving states as much flexibility as possible to control carbon output. The EPA rule is especially important in Texas. Scientists are becoming increasingly convinced that the droughts that have been so devastating to Texas over the past decade are due to climate change. We need to be actively reversing the causes and effects of climate change. Power plants account for 40% of the carbon pollution in the United States. We limit mercury, arsenic, lead, smog and soot from power plants — the time has definitely come to also limit carbon emissions. Every time the EPA has set pollution limits — such as carbon monoxide, smog, & chemicals that affect the ozone layer — there were people who said it would hurt the economy. Yet we've proceeded and found that we have cleaner safer lives AND a healthy economy. Opponents of the rule fear negative impacts on the economy. In truth, the greatest economic danger is inaction. The untold billions of dollars that will result from unchecked climate change will be staggering to the economies of the world. If handled properly, addressing climate change can be an economic asset. Texas is a prime example of the economic growth that can come from alternative sources of energy. Natural
P. 0. Box 822554 • Dallas, TX 75382 TCA@TCAtexas.org

• 512-327-4119 TCAtexas.org

### gas and wind energy are key drivers for the Texas economy, and solar power is growing fast.

Texas has shown that we can maintain grid reliability and keep costs down. This debate hinges on a very simple question: Should power plants be able to dump unlimited amounts of carbon pollution into our skies, or is there a reasonable limit? I vote for a reasonable limit, to give my grandchildren and their children the opportunity to enjoy the benefits I've had in my life. Thank you.

Mack Turner, Chairman Texas Conservation Alliance
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abgenix, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I herebycertify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

August 9, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ H. WARD WOLFF                                          |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | H. Ward Wolff                                              |
|   | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Finance |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)               |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Abgenix, Inc. and will be retained by Abgenix, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
Case No. 6,714a.

#### HOTALING v. The TITAN.

[23 Betts. D. C. MS. 42.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

March Term, 1857.

Collision — Negligence—Lights.

[It is an act of blamable misconduct for a vessel to run through a harbor at night time without exhibiting the lights prescribed by law.]

.[This was a libel in admiralty by Jasper K. Hotaling against the steamboat Titan.]

BETTS, District Judge.

The libellant’s barge was in tow of the steamer Marshall, passing up the East River on a moonlight night, displaying her lights according to usage, when a collision occurred between her and the steamer Titan, running down the river without any lights exhibited, about opposite *Fulton*ferry, but nearest the Brooklyn side. The conflict of testimony common to these actions, respecting the doings and omissions of the respective vessels, pervaded the statements of the witnesses on the opposing vessels. The evidence for the libellant that owing to a haze upon the water, or some other condition of the atmosphere, at the moment the vessels were nearing each other, the Titan was not discoverable from the Marshall, is corroborated by the testimony of witnesses outside the two vessels who were in a situation to notice the fact. Here was, then, an act of blamable misconduct in the Titan, to run through the harbor in the night time without exhibiting lights in the manner prescribed by law, and as she does not succeed in outweighing the evidence given by the Marshall and barge that they committed no fault in the transactions leading to the collision, the wrongful cause of the collision must be held to be with the Titan. Decree for damages, with order of reference.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
                  October
                  16, 2006
              By:
              */s/
                John B.
                Gallagher*Name:John
                  B. Gallagher
                  Title:Co-Chief Executive Officer
  Date:
                  October
                  16, 2006
              By:
              */s/
                Harry D.
                Shields*Name:Harry
                    D. Shields
                  Title:Co-Chief Executive
                      Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Mark I. Gittelman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
    of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                        
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition
        of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result
    of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

|      |  |                   |  | /s/ Mark I. Gittelman                    | 
|----- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | 
|Date: |  | February 14, 2008 |  |                                          | 
|      |  |                   |  | Mark I. Gittelman                        | 
|      |  |                   |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of | 
|      |  |                   |  | Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.              | 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
| Fauna Series No. 4

**Cover**

Contents

Foreword

Introduction

Population and Mortality

Habits

Food

Elk

Deer

Antelope

Bighorn

Other Larger Mammals

Small Mammals

Birds

Misc. Diet

Conclusions

Bibliography | **UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|