alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extendicare Health Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Mark W. Durishan, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of
the Company, certify solely for purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
based on my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Mark W. Durishan
-----------------------------------------------------
Mark W. Durishan
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
November 14, 2002
-----------------












                                       30
Bulletin No. 2019-02

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to Bulletin No. 2018-05, U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury

Financial Manual (TFM) Supplement

1. Purpose—This Bulletin notifies agencies that Part 1 and Part 2 of the USSGL has been revised for

Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 and FY 2019.

2. Summary of Changes—The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. 

3. Changes by Part/Section/File

Part 1—FY 2018 Reporting changes to files in Sections V, VI, and VII:

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2018 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

Statement of Budgetary Resources

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources & Schedule P Budget Program

and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2018 Reporting

Reclassified Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2018 Reporting

Validation Detail

Edit Summary

Edit Detail

Closing Edits

Part 2—FY 2019 Reporting changes to files in Sections I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII:

Section I: Chart of accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Page 1 of 3
Section III: Account Transactions

Transaction Listing

Transactions

T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

USSGL Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2019 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

Balance Sheet

Statement of Net Cost

Statement of Changes in Net Position

Statement of Budgetary Resources

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources & Schedule P Budget Program

and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2019 Reporting

Reclassified Statement of Net Cost

Reclassified Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2019 Reporting

Validation Summary

Validation Detail

Edit Summary

Edit Detail

Closing Edits

4. Effective Date

Part 1 and Part 2 requirements are effective immediately

5. Inquiries

Direct questions concerning this Bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Jaime M. Saling

Director, Financial Reports and Advisory Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Telephone: 304-480-6485

Fax: 304-480-5176

Page 2 of 3
Date: December 20, 2018

Page 3 of 3
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 4/3/2023 1

Requiring Minor Parties to Qualify 

for the Ballot in Advance of Major Parties 

Barr v. Ireland 

(John T. Copenhaver, Jr., S.D. W. Va. 2:08-cv-990) 

A minor party complained that it was unfair to require it to submit 

ballot-petition signatures in advance of major parties’ declaring 

their candidates. The district judge dismissed the complaint, finding the deadline reasonable in light of the time required to verify 

signatures before the preparation of absentee ballots. The judge also 

concluded that the reason that the party did not meet the deadline 

was that it started collecting signatures too late. 

Subject: Getting on the ballot. Topics: Getting on the ballot; 

intervention; absentee ballots. 

The Libertarian Party, its candidates for President and Vice President, and 

two voters filed a federal complaint in the Southern District of West Virginia 

on August 13, 2008, complaining that the August 1 deadline for ballotpetition signatures for minor parties was unfair in light of the major parties’ 

not selecting their candidates until August 28 and September 4.1 With their 

complaint, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction extending the party’s signature deadline until September 4.2

On August 18, Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr., ordered service on the defendant secretary of state and set a conference and possible hearing for August 25.3

 At the plaintiffs’ request, Judge Copenhaver rescheduled the proceeding for August 27.4

On September 5, Judge Copenhaver dismissed the action.5 Judge Copenhaver found the August 1 deadline a reasonable period of time in advance of 

the September 23 deadline for distributing absentee ballots for signature verification.6

 Moreover, Judge Copenhaver concluded that the party’s failure to 

obtain enough signatures in time resulted from its late start in seeking them.7

1. Complaint, Barr v. Ireland, No. 2:08-cv-990 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 13, 2008), D.E. 1; Barr 

v. Ireland, 575 F. Supp. 2d 747, 749 (S.D. W. Va. 2008); see Tom Searls, Libertarian Candidate Barr Doesn’t Make Cut for State Ballot, Charleston Gazette, Aug. 9, 2008, at 1A (reporting that the campaign hoped to have enough signatures soon after the deadline). 

2. Preliminary-Injunction Motion, Barr, No. 2:08-cv-990 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 13, 2008), 

D.E. 3. 

3. Order, id. (Aug. 18, 2008), D.E. 7. 

4. Order, id. (Aug. 20, 2008), D.E. 9; see Barr, 575 F. Supp. 2d at 749; Minutes, Barr, No. 

2:08-cv-990 (S.D. W. Va. Aug. 27, 2008), D.E. 22 (preliminary-injunction hearing); Minutes, 

id. (Aug. 27, 2008), D.E. 21 (pretrial conference). 

5. Barr, 575 F. Supp. 2d 747; see Judge Tosses Barr’s W. Va. Ballot Access Lawsuit, 

Charleston Gazette, Sept. 8, 2008, at 2A. 

6. Barr, 575 F. Supp. 2d at 751–53. 

7. Id. at 761. 
Requiring Minor Parties to Qualify for the Ballot in Advance of Major Parties 

2 Federal Judicial Center 4/3/2023 

On May 21, 2009, Judge Copenhaver denied a request from a non-party 

to reopen the case, intervene, and seek reconsideration.8

8. Order, Barr, No. 2:08-cv-990 (S.D. W. Va. May 21, 2009), D.E. 25.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                         WARNING MODEL MANAGEMENT, INC.
                           (F/K/A FAMOUS FIXINS, INC.)
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warning Model  Management,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Stanley Tepper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.




                                                /s/ Stanley Tepper
                                                ------------------------------
                                                Stanley Tepper
                                                Chief Financial Officer
                                                November 18, 2003
KANEB SERVICES, INC.

      CORPORATE INSURERS LTD
 
      KANEB INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, INC.
          Kaneb Investment, L.L.C.

      KANEB (BVI) CORP.

      FURMANITE GERMANY, INC.
          Management Services Furmanite Holding GmbH
             Furmanite Technische Dienstleisfungen GmbH (formerly
                Zweipack GmbH)
             Furmanite Pipeline Ingenieur - Team GmbH
             Furmanite Industrie Service GmbH

      KANEB EQUIPMENT LEASING COMPANY, INC.
          Furmanite Equipment Leasing Company, Inc.

      KANEB INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
          InformaTech, Inc.
          National Asset Acceptance, Inc.
          National Asset Information Services, Inc.
          Fields Financial Services, Inc. (formerly Kaneb Metering Corp.)
             Fields Data Management
          Viata Corporation
          Greentree Software and Services, Inc.

      FURMANITE WORLDWIDE, INC. (formerly Kaneb International, Inc.)
          Furmanite America Inc.
             Kaneb Energy Canada, Ltd.
                 Furmanite Canada Ltd
          Furmanite Offshore Services, Inc.
             Furmseal (pty) Limited
             Furmanite Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Denon Pty Ltd)
             Furmanite V & P Engineering Ltd (formerly V & P Engineering Ltd)
             Furmanite Holding AS
                 Furmanite AS (Norway)
                    CMS:  Corrision Monitoring Services AS
             Furmanite SA
             Furmanite NV
                 Metalock NV (Belgium)
             Furmeta Holding BV
                 Metaholding BV
                    Furmanite BV
                    Metalock BV
             Furmanite East Asia Ltd (Hong Kong)
             Furmanite Singapore PTE Ltd.
          Furmanite plc (formerly Kaneb UK plc)
                 Furmanite 1986 LTD
                 Furmanite International LTD

       KANEB PIPE LINE COMPANY
          Kaneb Pipe Line Partners, L.P.
          Kaneb Pipe Line Operating Partnership, L.P.
             Support Terminal Operating Partnership, L.P.     
             Support Terminal Services, Inc. 
                 StanTrans, Inc. 
                    StanTrans Holding, Inc. 
                        StanTrans Partners, L.P.    
          Kaneb Management Company, Inc.
             Diamond K Limited
             Kaneb Management, L.L.C.
          Martin Oil Corporation
      SUSSEX INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
      TEXAS ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNEST CASSELL WOODS, II,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1225 LKK GGH P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY, Warden, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

rights action. On May 13, 2005, plaintiff filed his fourth request for the appointment of counsel. 

Plaintiff’s previous requests were filed on July 4, 2005, July 30, 2004 and April 19, 2005. All

requests were denied. In light of those orders, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s May

13, 2005 fourth request is denied. 

DATED: 6/15/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:kf

wood1225.31 

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 28 Filed 06/16/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of American Bank Note Holographics,
Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered
by the Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



By:

/s/ Mark J. BonneyMark J. Bonney Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer


Date: May 15, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. and will be retained by American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7558

CHRISTOPHER A. CALLOWAY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District

Judge. (CA-01-927-2)

Submitted: December 16, 2002 Decided: December 23, 2002

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher A. Calloway, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett

Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher A. Calloway, a state prisoner, seeks to appeal the

district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28

U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude on

the reasoning stated by the district court that Calloway has not

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

See Calloway v. Angelone, No. CA-01-927-2 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 3,

2002 & entered Oct. 4, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)

(2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 49147.

#### Protests 929805-G, etc., of Lou I. Lubin, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony showed that certain items consist of hats similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 47291. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as to those items.
exhibit101.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    Note

     

    $34,000,000.00                                                                                                                                                 June 26,
2008

     

                        New York, New
York

     

    


    The
undersigned (“Borrower”), for value
received, promises to pay to the order of FOURTH THIRD LLC (“Lender”) at the
principal office of FOURTH THIRD LLC (the “Agent”) in New York
City, New York the principal sum of $34,000,000, representing the aggregate
unpaid amount of the Loan made to Borrower by Lender pursuant to the Credit
Agreement referred to below, such principal amount to be payable on the dates
set forth in the Credit Agreement.

     

    Borrower
further promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the Loan from
the date of such Loan until such Loan is Paid in Full, payable at the rate(s)
and at the time(s) set forth in the Credit Agreement.  Payments of
both principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States
of America to the deposit account located in New York City and identified in the
Credit Agreement.

     

    This Note
evidences indebtedness incurred under, and is subject to the terms and
provisions of, a certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June
__, 2008 (as heretofore amended, and as further amended, supplemented, restated
or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”;
terms not otherwise defined herein are used herein as defined in the Credit
Agreement), among Borrower, the other Loan Parties named therein, the financial
institutions (including Lender) party thereto from time to time and Agent, to
which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms and
provisions under which this Second Amended and Restated Note may or must be paid
prior to its due date or its due date accelerated.

     

    This Note is made under and governed by
the laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be
performed entirely within such State.

    


    


    [signature
page follows]

     


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    


     

    NEW EARTH
LNG, INC.

    


    


    By: /s/ Kevin Markey    

    Title:
President
Meeting Notes

Subject: 316(b) ESA Consultation Status Update

Date: November 15, 2013

Location: 5233 B EPA West

Attendees: See attachment

EPA hosted a meeting with litigants, National Marine Fisheries Service and U.S. Fish and 

Wildlife Service. The litigants spoke about their findings and analysis of the threatened and 

endangered species impacted by cooling water intakes. EPA and the Services were in listening 

mode.

There were no outcomes of the meeting or next steps.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

IN THE MATTER OF: 

JAMES KEARNS 

Respondent. 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0683 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

FAA Case No. 2012S0275132 

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

The Complainant, by and through the undersigned attorney, pursuant to Section 13.215 of the 

Board's Rules of Practice [14 CFR 13.215] withdraws the Complaint in the above-referenced 

matter. 

The parties reached settlement of this matter on January 29, 2015. As a result, the Complainant 

respectfully requests that its Complaint be withdrawn and this matter closed. 

Respectfully submitted this 29th day of January. 

Senior Attorney 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a copy of the Withdrawal of Complaint has been sent via facsimile and 

Federal Express to: 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan 

DOT, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor 

Room E12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

(FAX) (202) 366-7536 

and 

John O.C. Moss, Esq. 

Moss & Moss, LLP 

220 Fifth A venue, Suite 900 

New York, New York 10001 

(FAX) (212) 644 2590 

and Federal Express to: 

James Kearns 

270 Union Street, Apt. 2 

Brooklyn, NY 11231 

and the original and one copy via Federal Express to: 

Hearing Docket 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-3 0 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

W shington, D.C. 20590 

Leg istant 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

~Jj ~l9 .au~ 

Dated
Exhibit 21


           SUBSIDIARIES OF INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION


     The following is a list of the Company's subsidiaries as of March 
1, 1998, except for unnamed subsidiaries which, considered in the 
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant 
subsidiary.

                                                          Jurisdiction
                                                               of 
Name of Subsidiary                                        Incorporation
------------------                                        -------------

Damca International Corporation                             Delaware
  Inversiones MONACA, C.A.                                  Venezuela
    AGROMONACA, C.A.                                        Venezuela
    Molinos Nacionales, C.A. (MONACA)                       Venezuela
  Robin Hood Multifoods Inc.                                Ontario
    Multifoods Inc.                                         Ontario
    Gourmet Baker Inc.                                      Ontario
    980964 Ontario Limited                                  Ontario
Fantasia Confections, Inc.                                  California
MINETCO - Minnesota International 
    Export Trading Company, Inc.                            Minnesota
Multifoods Bakery Distributors, Inc.                        Delaware
Multifoods Bakery International, Inc.                       Delaware
Multifoods Distribution Group, Inc.                         Delaware
    Multifoods Specialty Distribution, Inc.                 Delaware
    VSA, Inc.                                               Colorado
UPDATE ON THE FEDERAL 

JUVENILE DELINQUENCY 

ACT 

18 U.S.C. § 5033 

Former Legal Division Intern, Joey 

Caccarozzo, wrote an article for the 

October 2001 The Quarterly Review on 

Juvenile Miranda Rights under the Federal 

Juvenile Delinquency Act. There is 

another recent circuit court case which 

found a violation of the Act, resulting in 

the suppression of a confession. 

In U.S. v. Female Juvenile (Wendy 

G.), 255 F.3d 761 (9th Cir. 2001), the agent 

called the juvenile’s mother within one 

hour of the arrest on drug charges. The 

agent informed the mother of the charges 

and her daughter’s Miranda rights. When 

the mother asked where and when she 

could speak to her daughter, the agent 

gave her directions to the Federal Building 

and the time the next day when her 

daughter would be there. The mother was 

not told she could talk with her daughter 

before questioning. The agent got the 

juvenile’s Miranda waiver and her 

confession to drug smuggling. Trial 

testimony indicated that if the mother had 

been allowed to speak to her daughter 

before the interview, she would have 

advised her not to talk to the agent. 

The court held that the agent’s 

failure to inform the mother that she 

could confer with her daughter before 

any interrogation violated the Act’s 

requirement to give juveniles “access to 

meaningful support and counsel.” The 

court concluded that the violation of the 

Act caused the confession, which was 

highly prejudicial. The confession was 

suppressed.