alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOTICE FOR DISMISSAL - 1 

Invent This Inc. 

The Law Office of Anthony R. Carlis 

Suite 1D 

110 Hopewell Road 

Downingtown, PA 19335 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

Anthony R. Carlis 

Invent This Inc. 

The Law Office of Anthony R. Carlis 

Suite 1D 

110 Hopewell Road 

Downigtown, PA 19335 

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF 

PENNSYLVANIA 

Quick Switch Enterprises, L.L.C., 

 Plaintiff, 

 vs. 

Flair Electronics, Inc., 

 Defendant 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

Case No.: Civil No. 05-4401 

NOTICE FOR DISMISSAL 

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), Plaintiff, Quick Switch 

Enterprises, L.L.C. ("Quick-Switch") respectfully requests the dismissal of the present 

case and the associated claims pending in said case without prejudice. 

Dated this 19th day of January, 2006 

Anthony R. Carlis Esq. 

Invent This Inc. 

The Law Office of Anthony R. Carlis

Suite 1D 

110 Hopewell Road 

Downigtown, PA 19335 

Anthony R. Carlis 

Case 2:05-cv-04401-JD Document 4 Filed 01/19/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 54629.

#### Breidenbach Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 133082-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of American Bank Note Holographics,
Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered
by the Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



By: /s/ Kenneth H. TraubKenneth H. TraubPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 7, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. and will be retained by American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 143 (Thursday, July 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44946-44947]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17922]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9838-9]

Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board; Notice of Charter 
Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency 
(EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App. 2, the 
Environmental Laboratory Advisory Board (ELAB) is a necessary 
committee, which is in the public interest. Accordingly, ELAB will be 
renewed for an additional two-year period. The purpose of the ELAB is 
to provide advice and recommendations to the Administrator of EPA on 
issues associated with enhancing EPA's measurement programs and the 
systems and standards of environmental accreditation. Inquiries may be 
directed to Lara P. Phelps, Senior Advisor, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Office of the Science Advisor, 109 T W Alexander 
Drive (E243-05), Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 or by email: 
phelps.lara@epa.gov.

[[Page 44947]]

    Dated: June 5, 2013.
Glenn Paulson,
Science Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2013-17922 Filed 7-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of DirectorsFurniture Brands International, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statements (Nos. 33-65714, 333-6990, 333-39355, 333-80189, 333-100133and 333-130322) on Form S-8 of Furniture Brands International, Inc. (theCompany) of our reports dated March 1, 2007, with respect to the consolidatedbalance sheets of Furniture Brands International, Inc. as of December 31, 2006and 2005, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2006, the related financial statementschedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reportsappear in the December31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Furniture Brands International, Inc.

As discussed in note 2 to the consolidatedfinancial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 123 (Revised 2004), *Share-Based Payments*,effective January 1, 2006.  As discussedin note 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adoptedStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, *Employers’Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,*effective December 31, 2006.
| /s/ KPMG LLP |   |
|--------------|--------|

 

St. Louis, MissouriMarch 1, 2007

----
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 4/27/2023 1

Fatal Defect in a Petition 

to Replace a Primary-Election Candidate 

Diaz v. New York City Board of Elections 

(I. Leo Glasser, E.D.N.Y. 1:04-cv-3836) 

The district judge denied a discrimination claim filed by a plaintiff 

who was excluded as a replacement candidate for a primary election, because the plaintiff’s replacement application omitted a required signed consent to replace the withdrawn candidate. 

Subject: Getting on the ballot. Topics: Getting on the ballot; 

equal protection; primary election; intervention. 

A prospective candidate for female member of the Democratic State Committee for the 54th Assembly District filed a federal complaint in the Eastern 

District of New York on September 3, 2004, challenging her exclusion from 

the September 14 primary-election ballot.1 On the day that the case was filed, 

Magistrate Judge Steven M. Gold set the case for hearing on September 9.2

On September 7, District Judge I. Leo Glasser set the September 9 hearing for 

his courtroom.3

Judge Glasser denied the plaintiff a preliminary injunction putting her on 

the ballot.4

 He issued an opinion explaining his ruling on September 14.5

The plaintiff complained of discrimination in rejecting her application to 

replace a candidate who had withdrawn from the committee primary election.6

 Judge Glasser determined that omission from the plaintiff’s ballot petition of a signed consent to replace the withdrawn candidate was a fatal defect 

and no discrimination was shown.7

On September 6, 2005, Judge Glasser signed a voluntary dismissal.8

1. Complaint, Diaz v. N.Y. City Bd. of Elections, No. 1:04-cv-3836 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 3, 

2004), D.E. 1. 

2. Order to Show Cause, id. (Sept. 3, 2004), D.E. 3. 

Judge Gold retired on January 4, 2021. Judicial Milestones, www.uscourts.gov/judicialmilestones/steven-m-gold. 

3. Order to Show Cause, Diaz, No. 1:04-cv-3836 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 7, 2004), D.E. 2. 

4. Diaz v. N.Y. City Bd. of Elections, 335 F. Supp. 2d 364 (E.D.N.Y. 2004); Minutes, Diaz, 

No. 1:04-cv-3836 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 9, 2004), D.E. 8. 

5. Opinion, Diaz, No. 1:04-cv-3836 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 14, 2004), D.E. 7, 335 F. Supp. 2d 

364. 

6. Complaint, supra note 1; Diaz, 335 F. Supp. 2d at 365–67. 

7. Diaz, 335 F. Supp. 2d at 365–68. 

8. Order, Diaz, No. 1:04-cv-3836 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 6, 2005), D.E. 15.
#### Harold W. SAMPSON, III, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. State of CALIFORNIA, Defendant Elsinore Valley Municipal Water District, Defendant—Appellee.

No. 01-55012.

D.C. No. CV-00-00749-RJT.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 25, 2001.

*602Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a). The motion for oral argument filed September 27, 1999 is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Harold W. Sampson appeals the district court’s orders granting the defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) and declining jurisdiction over Sampson’s pendent state law claims. The facts and prior proceedings are known to the parties; they are not restated herein except as necessary.

I

The district court did not err in granting the motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). Sampson’s cause of action had already been determined on its merits between the same parties in the state eminent domain proceeding. Sampson’s federal suit thus is barred by res judicata and the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution. *Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama Bank,*474 U.S. 518, 523, 106 S.Ct. 768, 88 L.Ed.2d 877 (1986).

II

The district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to retain jurisdiction over Sampson’s state law claims. *See Binder v. Gillespie,*184 F.3d 1059, 1066 (9th Cir.1999), *cert. denied,*528 U.S. 1154, 120 S.Ct. 1158, 145 L.Ed.2d 1070 (2000).

AFFIRMED

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0006257 23-DEC-2014 08:06 AM
II 

Calendar No. 619 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4228 

To redesignate the Cottonwood Visitor Center at Joshua Tree National Park 

as the ‘‘Senator Dianne Feinstein Visitor Center’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 1, 2024 

Mr. PADILLA (for himself and Ms. BUTLER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Reported by Mr. MANCHIN, with an amendment and an amendment to the 

title 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Cottonwood Visitor Center at Joshua 

Tree National Park as the ‘‘Senator Dianne Feinstein 

Visitor Center’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4228 RS

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE COTTONWOOD VIS2 ITOR CENTER AT JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL 

3 PARK AS THE ‘‘SENATOR DIANNE FEINSTEIN 

4 VISITOR CENTER’’. 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Cottonwood Visitor Cen6 ter at Joshua Tree National Park shall be known and des7 ignated as the ‘‘Senator Dianne Feinstein Visitor Center’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the visitor center referred to in subsection (a) 

11 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Senator Dianne 

12 Feinstein Visitor Center’’. 

13 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF THE COTTONWOOD VIS14 ITOR CENTER AT JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL 

15 PARK AS THE ‘‘DIANNE FEINSTEIN VISITOR 

16 CENTER’’. 

17 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Cottonwood Visitor Center 

18 at Joshua Tree National Park, or any successor to that vis19 itor center, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Dianne 

20 Feinstein Visitor Center’’. 

21 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regu22 lation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

23 States to the visitor center referred to in subsection (a) shall 

24 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Dianne Feinstein Visitor 

25 Center’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4228 RS

Amend the title so as to read: ‘‘A bill to redesignate 

the Cottonwood Visitor Center at Joshua Tree National 

Park as the ‘Dianne Feinstein Visitor Center’.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 619 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4228 

A BILL 

To redesignate the Cottonwood Visitor Center at 

Dianne Feinstein Visitor Center’’. Joshua Tree National Park as the ‘‘Senator 

NOVEMBER 21, 2024 

Reported with an amendment and an amendment to the 

title 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8032]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2968]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review; Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its 
intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The 
purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations 
concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The 
agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals 
as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation 
may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The 
majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., 
Arlington, Virginia 22230.
    These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being 
reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, 
including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and 
personal information concerning individuals associated with the 
proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) 
of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the 
agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act.
    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an 
individual basis in the Federal Register. NSF intends to publish a 
notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of 
the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the 
proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on 
changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site: 
http://www.nsf.gov. This information may also be requested by 
telephoning, 703/292-8182.

    Dated: February 15, 2007.
Susanne Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-2968 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Williams. Renee (OST) From: Henrik & Snow [nordstar@sbcglobal.net] Sent: To: Cc: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 4:25 PM supervisor@town.massena.ny.us; anicola@twcny.rr.com; EAS (OST) Hawk and Toni-Marie Bayley Subject: support of Cape Air in Massena NY CapeAir is THE critical connection into (and out ofMassena). Without which Massena becomes so isolated from the rest ofthe country, it's ridiculous. CapeAiris efficient, convenient, with excellent service and staff. Forthose ofus who live across the country and have family in the Massena area, Cape Air makes visits possible. 

### Snow Babakhani nordstar@sbcglobal.net

1 '\0-
No. 54641.

#### J. & H. Baer Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 130221-K, etc. (New York).

*267Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
GAO-02-759R National Tropical Botanical Garden 

United States General Accounting Office

Washington, DC 20548 

May 17, 2002 

The Honorable F. James Sensenbrenner, Jr. 

Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary 

House of Representatives 

Subject: Federally Chartered Corporation: Review of the Financial Statement Audit 

Report for the National Tropical Botanical Garden for 2000 and 1999

Dear Mr. Chairman: 

As requested, we reviewed the audit report covering the financial statements of the 

National Tropical Botanical Garden, a federally chartered corporation, for the years 

ended December 31, 2000 and 1999. The corporation’s purpose is to establish, 

develop, operate, and maintain for the benefit of the people an educational and 

scientific center in the form of one or more tropical botanical gardens, and to foster 

and encourage fundamental research about tropical plant life and research and study 

of uses of tropical flora in agriculture, forestry, horticulture, medicine, and other 

sciencies. 

Federally chartered corporations are required under 36 U.S.C. 10101 to 

• present the corporation’s assets and liabilities and reasonable detail on the 

corporation’s income and expenses in annual financial statements, 

• obtain an annual financial audit by an independent public accountant, and 

• submit the auditors’ report and the corporation’s financial statements to the 

Congress. 

The objective of our review was to determine whether the audit report complied with 

the financial reporting requirements of the law. In carrying out our work, we 

reviewed the corporation’s financial statements and the accompanying notes, 

performed certain analytical procedures related to information presented in the 

financial statements, and reviewed the auditors’ report. However, we did not review 

the auditors’ working papers, and we are not rendering an audit opinion. Our review 

disclosed no reportable instances of noncompliance with the financial reporting 

requirements of the law. 
Page 2 GAO-02-759R National Tropical Botanical Garden 

The audit report included the auditors’ opinion that the financial statements of the 

corporation were presented fairly in accordance with U. S. generally accepted 

accounting principles. We are returning the audit report you sent with your letter. 

Sincerely yours, 

Jeanette M. Franzel 

Acting Director 

Financial Management and Assurance 

w/o Enclosure 

(194102)
LAW OFFICES OF

PORTER, SCOTT,

WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A PROFE S S IONA L C ORPORA T IO N

350 UN IVER S IT Y AVE ., SUIT E 200

P .O . BO X 255428

SACRAMENTO, CA 95865

(916) 929-1481

www.pswdlaw.com

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

00439858.WPD STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A Professional Corporation

Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 099180

John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301

350 University Avenue, Suite 200

Sacramento, California 95825

(916) 929-1481

(916) 927-3706 (facsimile)

Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANE DUNCAN,

Plaintiff,

vs.

S A C R A M E N T O C O U N T Y ;

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S

DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF LOU BLANAS,

and DOES I through XXX, inclusive, 

Defendants.

 /

Case No.: CIV S-04-0523 LKK DAD

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

PURSUANT TO FRCP 41 (a)(2)

First Amended Complaint filed 06/14/04

Trial Date: September 26, 2006

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff DIANE

DUNCAN and Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT by and through their undersigned counsel, that any and all

claims against Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

///

Case 2:04-cv-00523-LKK -EFB Document 107 Filed 09/25/06 Page 1 of 2
LAW OFFICES OF

PORTER, SCOTT,

WEIBERG & DELEHANT

A PROFE S S IONA L C ORPORA T IO N

350 UN IVER S IT Y AVE ., SUIT E 200

P .O . BO X 255428

SACRAMENTO, CA 95865

(916) 929-1481

www.pswdlaw.com

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

00439858.WPD STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

DATED: September 13, 2006 Respectfully Submitted,

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN

/s/ - “Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild”

BY:_____________________________________

Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild

Attorneys for Plaintiff

DATED: September 13, 2006 Respectfully Submitted,

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

/s/ - “John R. Whitefleet”

BY:_____________________________________

Terence J. Cassidy

John R. Whitefleet

Attorneys for Defendants

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 25, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-00523-LKK -EFB Document 107 Filed 09/25/06 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-59,863] 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(C) an application for administrative reconsideration was filed with the Director of the Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance for workers at Delphi Corporation, Automotive Holdings Group, Moraine, Ohio. The application did not contain new information supporting a conclusion that the determination was erroneous, and also did not provide a justification for reconsideration of the determination that was based on either mistaken facts or a misinterpretation of facts or of the law. Therefore, dismissal of the application was issued.

TA-W-59,863; Delphi Corporation, Automotive Holdings Group, Moraine, Ohio (February 20, 2007).

Signed at Washington, DC, this 21st day of February 2007. 

Ralph DiBattista, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7-3458 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 50429.

#### Protests 57164-K, etc., of Louis Meyers & Son, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲★

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 1000

 1500

 2000

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.50 N 76.81 W Meters AGL