alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 59529.

protest 176458-K (Bridgeport).

#### Fairfield Wool Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste sheepskin scrap similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fairfield Wool Co., Inc. v. United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1653), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WESTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

ROSHA CHARLES WILLIAMS, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 55 WM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 20th day of June, 2016, the “Petition for Review” is DENIED.
----

EUROPEAN ANTI-FRAUD OFFICE (OLAF)

Publication of a vacancy for the posts of

Director ‘Investigations and Operations II’ (OLAF.B)

(AD 14 — Ref. COM/2006/10031)

and Director ‘Operation and Policy Support’ (OLAF.C)

(AD 14 — Ref. COM/2006/10032)

(2006/C 238 A/01)

We are

The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). The fight against fraud to the detriment of the European Communities' financial interests is central to the credibility of the European project. It is therefore accorded high priority by all the EU Institutions. OLAF is both an investigative service and the Directorate-General of the Commission responsible for the design and delivery of anti-fraud policy.

We propose

Applicants must:

The Directors will be selected and appointed by the Commission according to its selection and recruitment procedures. Salaries and conditions of employment are those laid down in the Staff Regulations for AD 14 grade officials of the European Communities. The Commission applies an equal opportunities policy.

Full job descriptions, selection criteria and application details can be found at:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm.

The link to the online application is:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html.

If you encounter technical problems, please send an e-mail to:

admin-management-online@ec.europa.eu.

The closing date for registration is 6 November 2006. Online registration will not be possible after 12.00 noon Brussels time.

----
# Main

Bulletin No. 2021-20	DRAFT &P	IRC Handouts 07 07 21

# Footnotes and Additional Inform

Bulletin No. 2021-20	DRAFT &P	IRC Handouts 07 07 21
No. 53486.

protests 865925-G, etc. (New York).

#### Century Glove Co. et al. *v.*United States,

*150Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiffs was therefore sustained.
No. 51385.

#### Protest 123556-K/752 of Jim L. Reynolds (Chicago).

Opinion by

Molilson, J.

An examination of the record failing to reveal anything which would warrant disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
Case No. 14,425.

#### UNITED STATES v. The ADVANCE.

[Cited in The Acorn, Case No. 29. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
# Bulletin No. 2020-10

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2020-10	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2020

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2020-10	&"Arial,Bold"&P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2020
Exhibit 24


AMERIPRISE CERTIFICATE COMPANY


POWER OF ATTORNEY





City of Minneapolis





State of Minnesota





Each of the undersigned as a director of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company’), a face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, hereby constitutes and appoints Abu M. Arif, Brian Granger, James R. Hill, Megan E. Garcy and Ryan C. Larrenaga or any one of them, as his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact with power of substitution and resubstitution to sign in his or her name, place and stead in any and all capacities, and to do any and all things and execute any and all instruments that such attorneys-in-fact may deem necessary or advisable under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and any rules, regulations and requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), in connection with the filing with the Commission of an Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 (the “Form 10-K”), including specifically, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the power and authority to sign his or her name in his or her capacity as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company to the Form 10-K and such other form or forms as may be appropriate to be filed with the Commission as any of them may deem appropriate, together with all exhibits thereto, and to any and all amendments thereto and to any other documents filed with the Commission, as fully and for all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms all that said attorneys-in-fact, each acting alone, and his or her substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.








Signed on this 15 th day of November 2023








_/s/ Karen M. Bohn______


Karen M. Bohn








_/s/ Lorna P. Gleason_____


Lorna P. Gleason








_/s/ Ronald L. Guzior_____


Ronald L. Guzior








_/s/ Robert J. McReavy____


Robert J. McReavy
(Reap. Dec. 10995)

#### Sandoz, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1003543.

(Decided June 2, 1965)

*Sharretts, Paley é Carter*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement bas been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above-named appeal for reappraisement is Olareantin, a coal tar product provided for in Item 403.60 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States, exported from England on or about March 23, 1964, and that said merchandise is not on the Final List of products (T.D. 54521) from which the action of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 is withheld.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was a similar competitive article manufactured or produced in the United States and that the price including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the article in condition packed ready for delivery, at which such article was freely sold for domestic consumption in the principal market of the United States, in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities at the time of exportation of the imported article was $2.36 on a 100% basis molecular weight 370, net packed, steel drums extra.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal be submitted on this stipulation being limited to the merchandise described as Olareantin.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402 (g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value was $2.36 on a 100 percent basis molecular weight 370, net packed, steel drums extra.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JAKE SANDOVAL and

MARIE SANDOVAL

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4282

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04282-JCJ Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
(Reap. Dec. 8160)

#### United States *v.*Goff & Page Co., a/c Alfred L. Hutton, Jr.

Entry Nos. CE 166; CE 283.

(Decided August 26, 1952)

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

Defendant not represented by counsel.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated by and between the undersigned, subject to the approval of the court, that at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved in the above appeals, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for export to the United States, as provided for by Section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, at the unit invoice prices converted at the rate of $4.03 per English pound *(£),*and that there was no higher foreign market value for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

> That these cases are submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the unit invoice prices converted at the rate of $4.03 per English pound sterling.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 21(a).  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                                             State of
Name                                         Organization

Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company                Indiana
     Irwin Union Collateral, Inc.                 Indiana
     Irwin Union Realty Corporation               Indiana
     Irwin Union Insurance, Inc.                  Indiana
     Irwin Union Securities, Inc.                 Indiana
     Irwin Funding Corp.                          Delaware
     Irwin Union Advisory Services, Inc.          Indiana
     Irwin Reinsurance Corporation                Vermont

IFC Mortgage Corporation                          Indiana
     Irwin Mortgage Corporation                   Indiana

Irwin Union Investor Services, Inc.               Indiana

Irwin Home Equity Corporation                     Indiana
     IHE Funding Corp.                            Delaware

Irwin Equipment Finance Corp.                     Indiana
     Irwin Leasing Corporation
     (formerly Affiliated Capital Corp.)          Illinois

Irwin Union Credit Insurance Corporation          Arizona

White River Capital Corporation                   Indiana

IFC Capital Trust I                               Delaware
No. 52963.

#### Leonard Gordon Importation Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 723259-G and 72166-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICKY HAMMONDS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0909 MCE GGH P

vs.

I. REYES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel filed January 24, 2005. 

Plaintiff states that defendants did not respond to the discovery requests he served on January 2,

2005. Pursuant to the December 22, 2004, discovery order, responses to a discovery request are

due forty-five days after the request is served. Plaintiff’s motion to compel is premature because

the time for defendants to respond to the requests had not passed when plaintiff filed the motion. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 24, 2005,

motion to compel is denied.

DATED: 5/3/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

ham909.com UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00909-MCE -GGH Document 42 Filed 05/04/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 61796.

#### Garcia & Vega, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 220610-K (Tampa).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BYRON CHAPMAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0885 FCD GGH

vs.

CITY OF VACAVILLE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 31, 2006, the parties met in settlement conference, and an agreement to

resolve the case as between all parties was made subject to final resolution by the City Council of

Vacaville. The tentative agreement was placed on the record. Mr. Elliot and the Vacaville

representative intend to recommend the settlement to the City at the next Council meeting on or

about June 13, 2006.

Because final approval by the City appears likely, and because the parties

reasonably do not wish to expend further sums and time in preparation for the pretrial

conference, the court will not require adherence to previously scheduled dates pending settlement

final approval. Therefore, in anticipation of final approval, all dates previously scheduled in this

case are vacated.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00885-FCD-GGH Document 30 Filed 06/05/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The parties shall inform the court forthwith after the City Council has acted upon

the tentative agreement.

Again anticipating final approval by the City, the parties consented on the record

to the jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge Hollows with respect to all follow-up settlement

proceedings, including any proceedings related to enforcement of a final settlement. The consent

is approved.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED:June 2, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

DATED: June 1, 2006.

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:lg

chapman0885.ord

Case 2:04-cv-00885-FCD-GGH Document 30 Filed 06/05/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 48492.

#### Protests 78914-K, etc., of African Metals Corp. et al. (New York).

*202Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Interdyne Company (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

September 20, 2004

                                         By: /s/ Sun Tze Whang
                                             -----------------------
                                             Sun Tze Whang
                                             Chief Executive Officer

September 20, 2004

                                         By: /s/ Kit H. Tan
                                             -----------------------
                                             Kit H. Tan
                                             Chief Financial Officer


                                       16
No. 64107.

protests 149207-K, 149246-K, and 149247-K (Los Angeles).

#### British American Importation Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Current industrial reports.MQ332E, Plumbing fixtures, summary [electronic resource].**
 
1998 | 1999
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.158/40:
Item Number:0142-A-52 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000555928
 
February 11, 2020
# C_2017070EN.01003102.xml

| 6.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/31

---

Order of the General Court of 12 January 2017 — Belis v Commission

(Case T-557/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 070/41)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 294, 7.9.2005 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-97/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016.

1

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHESTER RAY WISEMAN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

JOHN SEBOK, Correctional Sergeant; et

al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 12-56245

D.C. No. 2:10-cv-04710-DSFAJW

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 15, 2013** 

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Chester Ray Wiseman appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that

defendants transferred him in retaliation for his legal filings. We have jurisdiction

FILED

OCT 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-56245

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies, and for clear error the district court’s underlying factual

determinations. Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1117 (9th Cir. 2003). We

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Wiseman’s action without prejudice

because Wiseman did not exhaust prison grievance procedures concerning his

claim and failed to show that exhaustion was effectively unavailable. See

Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93-95 (2006) (exhaustion is mandatory and must be

done in a timely manner consistent with prison policies); Wyatt, 315 F.3d at 1120

(dismissal for failure to exhaust is without prejudice); cf. Nunez v. Duncan, 591

F.3d 1217, 1224 (9th Cir. 2010) (excusing prisoner’s failure to exhaust where

prisoner is prevented from doing so).

AFFIRMED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 1578** 

JAMES B. SKELTON , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, on appeal of Roe vs Wade 1973; JOHN G. ROBERTS, Chief Justice and Associ ate Justices , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia
. Margaret B. Seymour , District Judge. ( 3:11

- cv - 00091

- MBS )

Submitted : July 21, 2011 Decided: J uly 25, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
James B. Skelton, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CU RIAM: James B. Skelton appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Skelton v. U.S. Supreme Ct. , No. 3:11

- cv - 00091

- MBS (D.S.C. May 26, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
Before the Third Division,

July 1, 1942

No. 47345.

#### Protest 390206-G of Sun Wing Wo (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following *Great Pacific Co.*v. *United States*(T. D. 46921) certain of the merchandise was held dutiable at *%*of 1 cent per pound in accordance with stipulation of counsel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,144
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,154
<ALLOWANCES>                                       931
<INVENTORY>                                        336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,729
<PP&E>                                           8,652
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,015
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,953
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           148
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,263
<SALES>                                         10,607
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,101
<CGS>                                            1,174
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   13,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,778)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,778)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.48)


</TABLE>
No. 46692.

#### Protests 984810-G, etc., of F. W. Myers *&*Co., Inc. (Ogdensburg).

*416Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 161, C.D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protests were sustained to that extent.