alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
,;. --j ^ -, \ (i: 32 

UeHtirttfe 

Histpric a 

ffl-u-s-eu-ni 

^Aooomrotwoofciffitfpati 

P. O. Box 1S97 

201 W. Gregory Ave 

TeUuride, CO 81435 

Teh 970-728-3344 

FAX! 970-7^-6757 

27 August 2010 

Department of Transportation 

In tiie Matter of Grant Applications 

Small Communly Air SeMce Development Program 

Under49US.C. 417«etseq. 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0124 

To Whom It May Concern: 

I am vwTling in support of the Telluride Airport Authority request for a Smal Community Air Service 

Development Program grant award from the Department of Transportation. 

TellurkJe's economy is primarily tourism based and as such convenient air access is critical. The 

reduction In Tetluride Airport service has ^e^'iK sjgnlicant over (he past several year? resutthg in a 

signiricant increase h fiares. As a local resident I can tell you I ha\A resorted to driving great distances to use other airports. Increased fares ha/e also discouraged visitors from coming at all. Our 

community's access to an air service grant award will g M Telluride a competitive chance to increase 

air sennce, reduce airfares and recover air seat capacity lost over the last couple of years. 

Telluride Regional Airport is the highest altitude commercial aiiport in the United States. This presents additional challenges to attracting new air service and requires more funding h order to do so. 

Start-up funding support via the Small Commmlty Air Service Grant program would go along way to 

help the Telluride Airport achieve its goals. 

Thank you in advance for your conskleration of the Telluride Airport Authority Small Community Air 

Service Development Program Grant request 

Best Regards, 

Laur«i Bloemsma 

Executive Director 

Telluride Historical Museum Board of Directors 

President 

Vice Presid'Snt 

Treasurer 

Secretary 

San Miguel County 

Mountain ^/illaoe 

T^llundi 

Deborati Fr-^ednL^n 

F'lSula WalciRp 

fianny Craft 

Vicki Eidsmo 

Elatne Fischer 

Dan Garner 

Bob Saundijrt 

Directors Todd Brown 

C'lana C'jno'jitz 

Pudy Davison 

Carol Hinterrneister 

S^^a^| :?eay Mitchen 

•John Shields 

Jim Th.ejrp 

Errientus Richard Betti 

jack Hdcrison 

JohnPill^J-.iiry HI 

•^heila Waid
No. 52268.

protests 531564-G, etc. (New York).

#### Heilig & Florea, Inc. *v.*United States,

*304Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
C,UNITEDSTATESENVIRONMENTALPROTECTIONAGENCYREGIONIII1650ArchStreetPhiladelphia,Pennsylvania19103-2029
OCT
2 72010 Mr. George
S. Aburn, Jr., Director Maryland Department
of the Environment Air and Radiation Management Administration 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21230 Dear Mr. Abum: On April 23, 2010, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received

a revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department
of the Environment. The SIP revision numbered SIP revision #10-06 pertains
to the repeal of the general emission limitation

in section C4 of Regulation
.15 under COMAR 26.11.19, Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes and replacing the general limitation with
a source specific RACT limitation. EPA has determined that the submittal

is administratively
and technically complete, and is reviewing

it to prepare

a notice of proposed rulemaking. If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Christopher Cripps
at (215) 814-2179. He is the principal contact for this rulemaking. Sincerely, Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division cc: Brian Hug, MDE Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
#### Edward Nathaniel BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Fred D. HILDEBRAND, Superintendent; P.J. Krieger, Captain of Security, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-6021.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 18, 2001.

Edward Nathaniel Bell, pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Edward Bell, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Bell v. Hildebrand,*No. CA-00-637-7 (W.D.Va. filed Dec. 11, 2000; entered Dec. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ Marlene Debel
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: May 12, 2006
_____________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CIVIL ACTION

: NO. 10-5942

v. :

: CRIMINAL ACTION

NATHANIEL HURT : NO. 05-431

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2011, upon careful and independent

consideration of the Motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or

Correct the Sentence, the response thereto, and after review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart anddefendant’s Motion

Requesting Permission to Amend a Pending Section 2255 (Document 74) deemed to be

Objections to the Report and Recommendation, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct the Sentence is DENIED.

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

Berle M. Schiller, J.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4050 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4050

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To extend the deadline to commence construction of certain 
                hydroelectric projects on the Red River.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO COMMENCE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN 
              HYDROELECTRIC PROJECTS ON THE RED RIVER.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission projects 
numbered P-12756 and P-13160, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 
(referred to in this section as the ``Commission'') may, at the request 
of the licensee for the applicable project, and after reasonable 
notice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 
interest requirements of that section and the procedures of the 
Commission under that section, extend the time period during which each 
licensee is required to commence construction of the applicable project 
for one year from the date of the expiration of the extension most 
recently issued by the Commission under that section for the applicable 
project.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the time period required 
under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) for 
commencement of construction of a project described in subsection (a) 
expires before the date of enactment of this Act--
            (1) the Commission may reinstate the license for the 
        applicable project effective as of the date of expiration of 
        the license; and
            (2) the extension authorized under subsection (a) shall 
        take effect on the date of that expiration.

            Passed the Senate March 21, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4050

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

      To extend the deadline to commence construction of certain 
                hydroelectric projects on the Red River.
```
No. 47319.

#### Protest 956034-G of Oviatt Importing Co.

C. D. 620. Plaintiff's application for rehearing granted.
# sec6_rbalsh_2021

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-12 1	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RBS - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2021
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE NORMAN and EDITH HILL

TRUST, PAIMAN RAHBARIAN,

Defendants.

CIV S-04-0699 LKK PAN 

ORDER

-oOoPlaintiff shall serve his motion for judgment by default

upon defendant Paiman Rahbarian, and file proof of such service,

on or before August 25, 2005. The August 17 hearing is vacated

and rescheduled for Wednesday, September 21, 2005, at 9 a.m., in

Courtroom 25.

So ordered.

Dated: August 17, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00699-LKK -PAN Document 40 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 1
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 10/9/2023 1

Discriminatory Voter Challengers 

Curington v. Richardson 

(Charles R. Simpson III, W.D. Ky. 3:03-cv-665) 

On the Friday before a general election, a federal complaint alleged 

that a political party was going to selectively position voter challengers in predominantly African American precincts. On Monday, 

a state judge denied immediate relief in a related state-court action, 

and the federal plaintiffs made a tactical decision to withdraw their 

request in federal court for immediate relief. A year and a half later, 

the parties settled the case. 

Subject: Polling-place activities. Topics: Registration challenges; 

equal protection; matters for state courts. 

On Friday, October 31, 2003, five voters filed a class-action federal complaint 

in the Western District of Kentucky’s Louisville courthouse, alleging that the 

Jefferson County Republican Party planned to selectively position voter challengers in 59 predominantly African American precincts on the following 

Tuesday’s general-election day.1 The court assigned the case to Judge Charles 

R. Simpson III.2

On Monday, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order.3

 That day, however, the plaintiffs’ ACLU attorney informed Judge Simpson that he was not prepared to pursue the motion after all.4

 The Louisville 

Courier-Journal reported that the attorney said that “passing up the opportunity for a hearing was a tactical maneuver intended to have a judge decide 

the case on its merits.”5 Also on that Monday, a state-court judge denied 

immediate relief in an action filed in state court.6

On November 26, Judge Simpson referred the case to a magistrate judge 

for pretrial matters.7

 Following orderly pretrial proceedings,8 the parties announced a settlement on April 13, 2005.9

 Judge Simpson dismissed the action 

on May 9.10

1. Complaint, Curington v. Richardson, No. 3:03-cv-665 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 31, 2003), D.E. 

1; see Gregory A. Hall, ACLU Files Suit to Block GOP Poll Challengers, Louisville Courier-J., 

Nov. 1, 2003, at A1. 

2. Assignment Notice, Curington, No. 3:03-cv-665 (W.D. Ky. Oct. 31, 2003), D.E. 2. 

3. Temporary-Restraining-Order Motion, id. (Nov. 3, 2003), D.E. 3; see also Amendments to Complaint, id. (Nov. 3, 2003), D.E. 4. 

4. Order, id. (Nov. 3, 2003), D.E. 5. 

5. Joseph Gerth & Sheldon S. Shafer, Judge Allows Vote Challengers, Louisville Courier-J., 

Nov. 4, 2003, at A1. 

6. See id. 

7. Order, Curington, No. 3:03-cv-665 (W.D. Ky. Nov. 26, 2003), D.E. 9. 

8. E.g., Order, id. (Apr. 27, 2004), D.E. 12 (specifying minutes of a telephonic status conference). 

9. Agreed Motion to Dismiss, id. (Apr. 13, 2005), D.E. 16. 

10. Order, id. (May 9, 2005), D.E. 17.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0407

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KEITH WILLIAM WALKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 30, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 22 2021

03/22/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0407
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Remove an Endpoint/Role for a User in OTCnet

To remove an endpoint/role for OTCnet User, complete the following steps:

1. From the OTCnet Home page>Administration>Manage Users>Manage OTCnet Users

screen, select the Search User Directory button. 

2. From the Search User Directory screen, type the user email address in the search field. 

3. Under Manage User Account, select View Account. 

4. The Manage User Account screen displays as shown in Figure 1. Review the read-only 

information including the current endpoint/role assignments listed for the user. 

5. Select the Remove Endpoint/Role button. 

Figure 1: Manage User Account Screen 

6. The Select an Endpoint and Role to Remove screen displays as show in Figure 2. 

7. Select the Delete checkbox next to the specific Assigned Endpoint or Assigned Role at 

Endpoint item. 

You can select multiple checkboxes to remove multiple assigned endpoints/roles. 

8. Then select the Submit button to submit your request. 

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 2: Select an Endpoint and Role to Remove Screen 

9. The confirmation page about removing an endpoint/role request being submitted and 

awaiting approval appears as shown in Figure 3. 

10. Select the OK button to return to the Manage OTCnet Users screen. 

Figure 3: Confirmation Screen on Removing Endpoint/Role Request Submitted 

• You will be notified via e-mail when the request is approved or rejected by another 

PLSA/LSA. 

Application Tip
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP06-421-000]


Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corporation; Notice of Public 
Meeting for the Proposed Potomac Expansion Project

February 22, 2007.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or 
Commission) is holding a public meeting for Transcontinental Gas Pipe 
Line Corporation's (Transco's) proposed Potomac Expansion Project. The 
project would consist of the construction of about 20 miles of new 42-
inch-diameter pipeline in three loops located in Campbell, 
Pittsylvania, and Fairfax Counties, Virginia; and various aboveground 
facilities, including a proposed pig launcher/receiver facility at 
milepost 1,586.17 in Fairfax County, Virginia.
    The meeting will be on Friday, March 2, 2007, at 7 p.m. (EST) in 
the Virginia Run Community Center, 15355 Wetherburn Court, Centreville, 
VA 20120.
    This event is posted on the Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related 
information. For additional information, please contact the 
Commission's Office of External Affairs at 1-866-208-FERC.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3490 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Before the Third Division,

January 13, 1944

No. 49135.

#### Protest 85573-K of Werner Marx (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the hearing the plaintiff submitted the protest without introducing evidence in support of the claim made. The record failed to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Follow-Up on February 24, 2010 Meeting Regarding NPDES Program and Aquatic Pesticide 

Applications 

Steve Via 

to: 

Allison Wiedeman 

04/12/2010 03:47 PM 

Cc: 

Jack Faulk, Mike Muse, Michael Finn, William Jordan, Erica Brown, 'Mark Rentz' 

Show Details 

Ms. Wiedeman,

Thank you for the opportunity in February to talk with you and your staff about the NPDES Program’s approach to 

pesticide application to, on, or near water of the U.S. Attached is a letter prepared collaboratively by the 

American Water Works Association (AWWA), Association of California Water Agencies (ACWA), and the 

Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA) addressing the questions you posed to us during our 

meeting on this topic.

As indicated in our letter, please feel to contact me, Mark Rentz, or Erica Brown if you or your staff has any 

questions.

Best regards,

Steve Via

Steve Via

Regulatory Affairs Manager

American Water Works Association

1300 Eye Street, NW, Suite 701W

Washington DC  20005

Email:  svia@awwa.org

Office: (202) 628‐8303

Direct: (202) 326‐6130

Cell: (703) 915‐4387

Fax: (202) 628‐2846

 

 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jfaulk\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web8401.htm 5/12/2010
Edmondson, Lucy 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Lucy, 

ANNERAN Brian <finneran.brian@deq.state.or.us> 

Tuesday, May 26, 2015 5:03 PM 

Edmondson, Lucy 

Transcription error 

Just to note, there is a transcription error in the Grants Pass Carbon Monoxide Limited Maintenance Plan, dated April 

16,2015. 

This can be found in Table 2 at the bottom of page 5 of the document, under the column "Season, Lbs/Day". The error is 

the total at the end of that column. Rather than 4,826, the total should be 87,855. 

This number is accurately reported in Appendix B of the Plan, on page 1, in Table 2.2.1. Both tables are the same. 

Brian Fi11neran 

Oregon DEQ Air Quality 

(503) 229-6278 

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SANDRA CORTEZ : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

TRANS UNION, LLC : NO. 05-5684

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 30th day of April, 2007, in accordance

with the jury verdict by interrogatories,

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be and the same is hereby

entered in favor of plaintiff Sandra Cortez and against defendant

Trans Union, LLC in the amounts of $50,000 for actual damages and 

$750,000 for punitive damages.

 BY THE COURT:

 ATTEST: /s/Rosalind Burton-Hoop

 Rosalind Burton-Hoop

 Deputy Clerk

 

COPIES BY MAIL ON 4/30/07 TO: Bruce S. Luckman, Esquire

 Bryan V. Arner, Esquire

 Christopher N. Jones, Esquire

 James A. Francis, Esquire

 John Soumilas, Esquire

 Timothy P. Creech, Esquire

Civ 1 (8/80)

Case 2:05-cv-05684-JF Document 44 Filed 04/30/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ETOYS INC.'S
FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         162,145
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     52,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,197
<PP&E>                                         102,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,152)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 475,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,254
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           74,075
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     189,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   475,010
<SALES>                                         24,862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,862
<CGS>                                           19,415
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,415
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                61,228
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,985
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (56,957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (56,957)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (56,957)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.49)


</TABLE>
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 09/25 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●