60290 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ 

paragraph 311a. This airspace action is 

not expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exists 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (Air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120, E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 6, 2015, effective 

September 15, 2015, is amended as 

follows: 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Audubon, IA [Amended] 

Audubon County Airport, IA 

(Lat. 41°42′06′′ N., long. 94°55′14′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of the Audubon County Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Corning IA [Amended] 

Corning Municipal Airport, IA 

(Lat. 40°59′39′′ N., long. 94°45′18′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile 

radius of Corning Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Cresco, IA [Amended] 

Ellen Church Field Airport, IA 

(Lat. 43°21′55′′ N., long. 92°07′59′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile 

radius of Ellen Church Field Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Eagle Grove, IA [Amended] 

Eagle Grove Municipal Airport, IA 

(Lat. 42°42′36′′ N., long 93°54′58′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of the Eagle Grove Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Guthrie Center, IA [Amended] 

Guthrie County Regional Airport, IA 

(Lat. 41°41′13′′ N., long. 94°26′06′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of the Guthrie County Regional 

Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Hampton, IA [Amended] 

Hampton Municipal Airport, IA 

(Lat. 42°43′25′′ N., long. 93°13′35′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Hampton Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Harlan, IA [Amended] 

Harlan Municipal Airport, IA 

(Lat. 41°35′04′′ N., long. 95°20′23′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Harlan Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Iowa Falls, IA [Amended] 

Iowa Falls Municipal Airport, IA 

(Lat. 42°28′17′′ N., long. 93°16′15′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.3-mile 

radius of Iowa Falls Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Knoxville, IA [Amended] 

Knoxville Municipal Airport, IA 

(Lat. 41°17′57′′ N., long. 93°06′50′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.8-mile 

radius of Knoxville Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Oelwein, IA [Amended] 

Oelwein Municipal Airport, IA 

(Lat. 42°40′51′′ N., long. 91°58′28′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 7.3-mile 

radius of Oelwein Municipal Airport. 

* * * * * 

ACE IA E5 Red Oak, IA [Amended] 

Red Oak Municipal Airport, IA 

(Lat. 41°00′39′′ N., long. 95°15′32′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface within a 6.4-mile 

radius of Red Oak Municipal Airport; and 

within 2 miles each side of the 354° bearing 

from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile 

radius to 11 miles north of the airport. 

Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on September 23, 

2015. 

Vonnie L. Royal, 

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, 

ATO Central Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2015–25083 Filed 10–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 71 

[Docket No. FAA–2015–1622; Airspace 

Docket No. 15–AWP–9] 

Amendment of Class D and Class E 

Airspace; Stockton, CA 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This action modifies Class D 

airspace, Class E surface area airspace, 

and Class E airspace extending upward 

from 700 feet above the surface, at 

Stockton Metropolitan Airport, 

Stockton, CA. A review of the airspace 

and the decommissioning of the 

Manteca VHF omnidirectional radio 

range and distance measuring 

equipment (VOR/DME), has made it 

necessary to amend the airspace areas 

for the safety and management of the 

new Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures (SIAPs) for Instrument 

Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the 

airport. 

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, December 

10, 2015. The Director of the Federal 

Register approves this incorporation by 

reference action under title 1, Code of 

Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to 

the annual revision of FAA Order 

7400.9 and publication of conforming 

amendments. 

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Z, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, and subsequent amendments can 

be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/ 

air_traffic/publications/. For further 

information, you can contact the 

Airspace Policy and ATC Regulations 

Group, Federal Aviation 

Administration, 800 Independence 

Avenue SW., Washington, DC, 29591; 

telephone: 202–267–8783. The Order is 

also available for inspection at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to http://www.archives.gov/


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 60291 

federal_register/code_of_federalregulations/ibr_locations.html. 

FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace 

Designations and Reporting Points, is 

published yearly and effective on 

September 15. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steve Haga, Federal Aviation 

Administration, Operations Support 

Group, Western Service Center, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; 

telephone (425) 203–4563. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

The FAA’s authority to issue rules 

regarding aviation safety is found in 

Title 49 of the United States Code. 

Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the 

authority of the FAA Administrator. 

Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, 

describes in more detail the scope of the 

agency’s authority. This rulemaking is 

promulgated under the authority 

described in Subtitle VII, Part A, 

Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that 

section, the FAA is charged with 

prescribing regulations to assign the use 

of airspace necessary to ensure the 

safety of aircraft and the efficient use of 

airspace. This regulation is within the 

scope of that authority as it amends 

controlled airspace at Stockton 

Metropolitan Airport, Stockton, CA. 

History 

On June 24, 2015, the FAA published 

in the Federal Register a notice of 

proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to modify 

Class D airspace and Class E airspace at 

Stockton Metropolitan Airport, 

Stockton, CA (80 FR 36261) . Interested 

parties were invited to participate in 

this rulemaking effort by submitting 

written comments on the proposal to the 

FAA. No comments were received. 

Class D and Class E airspace 

designations are published in paragraph 

5000, 6002, and 6005, respectively, of 

FAA Order 7400.9Z, dated August 6, 

2015, and effective September 15, 2015, 

which is incorporated by reference in 14 

CFR part 71.1. The Class D and Class E 

airspace designations listed in this 

document will be published 

subsequently in the Order. 

Availability and Summary of 

Documents for Incorporation by 

Reference 

This document amends FAA Order 

7400.9Z, airspace Designations and 

Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, 

and effective September 15, 2015. FAA 

Order 7400.9Z is publicly available as 

listed in the ADDRESSES section of this 

final rule. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists 

Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, 

air traffic service routes, and reporting 

points. 

The Rule 

This amendment to Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 

modifies Class D airspace, Class E 

surface area airspace, and Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface at Stockton 

Metropolitan Airport, Stockton, CA. 

Decommissioning of the Manteca VOR/ 

DME, and subsequent review of the 

airspace revealed airspace redesign 

necessary for the safety and 

management of standard instrument 

approach procedures for IFR operations 

at the airport. The Class D airspace and 

Class E surface area airspace are 

expanded to within a 4.5-mile radius of 

Stockton Metropolitan Airport. Class E 

airspace extending upward from 700 

feet above the surface is modified to 

within a 7-mile radius of Stockton 

Metropolitan Airport. This action 

enhances the safety and management of 

controlled airspace within the NAS. 

Regulatory Notices and Analyses 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current, is non-controversial and 

unlikely to result in adverse or negative 

comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. Since this is a 

routine matter that only affects air traffic 

procedures and air navigation, it is 

certified that this rule, when 

promulgated, does not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

Environmental Review 

The FAA has determined that this 

action qualifies for categorical exclusion 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act in accordance with FAA 

Order 1050.1E, ‘‘Environmental 

Impacts: Policies and Procedures,’’ 

paragraph 311a. This airspace action is 

not expected to cause any potentially 

significant environmental impacts, and 

no extraordinary circumstances exist 

that warrant preparation of an 

environmental assessment. 

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 

Airspace, Incorporation by reference, 

Navigation (Air). 

Adoption of the Amendment 

In consideration of the foregoing, the 

Federal Aviation Administration 

amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows: 

PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, 

B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR 

TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND 

REPORTING POINTS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 71 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 

40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 

1959–1963 Comp., p. 389. 

§ 71.1 [Amended] 

■ 2. The incorporation by reference in 

14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z, 

Airspace Designations and Reporting 

Points, dated August 6, 2015, and 

effective September 15, 2015, is 

amended as follows: 

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace 

* * * * * 

AWP CA D Stockton, CA (Modified) 

Stockton Metropolitan Airport, CA 

(Lat. 37°53′39′′ N., long. 121°14′18′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface to and including 2,500 feet MSL 

within a 4.5 mile radius of Stockton 

Metropolitan Airport. This Class D airspace 

area is effective during the specific dates and 

times established in advance by a Notice to 

Airmen. The effective date and time will 

thereafter be continuously published in the 

Airport/Facility Directory. 

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace 

Designated as Surface Areas 

* * * * * 

AWP CA E2 Stockton, CA (Modified) 

Stockton Metropolitan Airport, CA 

(Lat. 37°53′39′′ N., long. 121°14′18′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface within a 4.5 mile radius of Stockton 

Metropolitan Airport. 

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas 

Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More 

Above the Surface of the Earth 

* * * * * 

AWP CA E5 Stockton, CA (Modified) 

Stockton Metropolitan Airport, CA 

(Lat. 37°53′39′′ N., long. 121°14′18′′ W.) 

Stockton Metropolitan Airport, point in 

space coordinates 

(Lat. 37°53′04′′ N., long. 121°13′18′′ W.) 

That airspace extending upward from the 

surface within a 6.5-mile radius of the 

Stockton Metropolitan Airport point in space 

coordinates at lat. 37°53′04′′ N., long. 

121°13′18′′ W. That airspace extending 

upward from 1,200 feet above the surface 

bounded on the east by long. 120°04′04′′ W, 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES
60292 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 193 / Tuesday, October 6, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

on the southeast by a line extending from lat. 

37°52′00′′ N, long. 120°04′04′′ W; to lat. 

37°38′00′′ N, long. 121°00′04′′ W, on the 

south by lat. 37°38′00′′ N, on the west by 

long. 121°37′04′′ W, and on the north by lat. 

38°07′00′′ N; excluding that airspace within 

Restricted Area R–2531 when active. 

Issued in Seattle, Washington, on 

September 29, 2015. 

Christopher Ramirez, 

Manager, Operations Support Group, Western 

Service Center. 

[FR Doc. 2015–25281 Filed 10–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

U.S. Customs and Border Protection 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

19 CFR Part 12 

[CBP Dec. 15–13] 

RIN 1515–AE05 

Extension of Import Restrictions on 

Certain Categories of Archaeological 

Material From the Pre-Hispanic 

Cultures of the Republic of Nicaragua 

AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, 

Department of Homeland Security; 

Department of the Treasury. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This document amends 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

regulations to reflect the extension of 

import restrictions on certain categories 

of archaeological material from the PreHispanic cultures of the Republic of 

Nicaragua. The restrictions, which were 

originally imposed by Treasury Decision 

(T.D.) 00–75 and extended by CBP 

Decision (CBP Dec.) 05–33 and CBP 

Dec. 10–32 are due to expire on October 

20, 2015. The Assistant Secretary for 

Educational and Cultural Affairs, United 

States Department of State, has 

determined that factors continue to 

warrant the imposition of import 

restrictions and no cause for suspension 

exists. Accordingly, these import 

restrictions will remain in effect for an 

additional 5 years, and the CBP 

regulations are being amended to reflect 

this extension until October 20, 2020. 

These restrictions are being extended 

pursuant to determinations of the 

United States Department of State made 

under the terms of the Convention on 

Cultural Property Implementation Act 

that implemented the United Nations 

Educational, Scientific and Cultural 

Organization (UNESCO) Convention on 

the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing 

the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of 

Ownership of Cultural Property. T.D. 

00–75 contains the Designated List of 

archaeological material representing 

Pre-Hispanic cultures of Nicaragua to 

which the restrictions apply. 

DATES: Effective: October 20, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

legal aspects, Lisa L. Burley, Chief, 

Cargo Security, Carriers and Restricted 

Merchandise Branch, Regulations and 

Rulings, Office of International Trade, 

(202) 325–0030. For operational aspects, 

William R. Scopa, Branch Chief, Partner 

Government Agency Branch, Trade 

Policy and Programs, Office of 

International Trade, (202) 863–6554, 

William.R.Scopa@cbp.dhs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Pursuant to the provisions of the 1970 

United Nations Educational, Scientific 

and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) 

Convention, implemented by the 

Convention on Cultural Property 

Implementation Act (Pub. L. 97–446, 19 

U.S.C. 2601 et seq.), the United States 

entered into a bilateral agreement with 

the Republic of Nicaragua concerning 

the imposition of import restrictions on 

certain categories of archeological 

material from the Pre-Hispanic cultures 

of the Republic of Nicaragua on June 16, 

1999, and following completion by the 

Government of Nicaragua of all internal 

legal requirements, the agreement 

entered into force on October 20, 2000. 

On October 26, 2000, the former U.S. 

Customs Service (now U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP)) published T.D. 

00–75 in the Federal Register (65 FR 

64140), which amended 19 CFR 

12.104g(a) to reflect the imposition of 

these restrictions and included a list 

designating the types of articles covered 

by the restrictions. 

Import restrictions listed in 19 CFR 

12.104g(a) are ‘‘effective for no more 

than five years beginning on the date on 

which the agreement enters into force 

with respect to the United States. This 

period may be extended for additional 

periods of not more than five years if it 

is determined that the factors which 

justified the initial agreement still 

pertain and no cause for suspension of 

the agreement exists’’ (19 CFR 

12.104g(a)). 

Since the initial notice was published 

on October 26, 2000, the import 

restrictions were extended twice. First, 

on October 20, 2005, CBP published 

CBP Dec. 05–33 in the Federal Register 

(70 FR 61031) which amended 19 CFR 

12.104g(a) to reflect the extension for an 

additional period of 5 years. 

Subsequently, on October 20, 2010, CBP 

published CBP Dec. 10–32 in the 

Federal Register (75 FR 64654) to 

extend the import restriction for an 

additional five year period to October 

20, 2015. 

On October 17, 2014, the Department 

of State received a request by the 

Government of the Republic of 

Nicaragua to extend the Agreement. 

Subsequently, the Department of State 

proposed to extend the Agreement. 

After considering the views and 

recommendations of the Cultural 

Property Advisory Committee, the 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and 

Cultural Affairs, United States 

Department of State, determined that 

the cultural heritage of Nicaragua 

continues to be in jeopardy from pillage 

of Pre-Hispanic archaeological 

materials, and made the necessary 

determinations to extend the import 

restrictions for an additional five years. 

Diplomatic notes have been exchanged, 

reflecting the extension of those 

restrictions for an additional five year 

period. Accordingly, CBP is amending 

19 CFR 12.104g(a) to reflect this 

extension of the import restrictions. 

The Designated List of Pre-Hispanic 

Archaeological Material from Nicaragua 

covered by these import restrictions is 

set forth in T.D. 00–75. The Designated 

List and accompanying image database 

may also be found at the following 

Internet Web site address: http://

exchanges.state.gov/heritage/culprop/

nifact.html. 

The restrictions on the importation of 

these archaeological materials from the 

Republic of Nicaragua are to continue in 

effect for an additional 5 years. 

Importation of such material continues 

to be restricted unless the conditions set 

forth in 19 U.S.C. 2606 and 19 CFR 

12.104c are met. 

Inapplicability of Notice and Delayed 

Effective Date 

This amendment involves a foreign 

affairs function of the United States and 

is, therefore, being made without notice 

or public procedure (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). 

In addition, CBP has determined that 

such notice or public procedure would 

be impracticable and contrary to the 

public interest because the action being 

taken is essential to avoid interruption 

of the application of the existing import 

restrictions (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B)). For the 

same reasons, a delayed effective date is 

not required under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

Because no notice of proposed 

rulemaking is required, the provisions 

of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with RULES