alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[House Report 108-267]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

108th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 1st Session                                                    108-267

======================================================================

 
  PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 2622, FAIR AND ACCURATE CREDIT 
                        TRANSACTIONS ACT OF 2003

                                _______
                                

 September 9, 2003.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res 360]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 360, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 2622, 
the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003, under a 
modified open rule. The rule provides one hour of general 
debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services.
    The rule waives all points of order against consideration 
of the bill. The rule provides that the amendment in the nature 
of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial 
Services now printed in the bill shall be considered as an 
original bill for the purpose of amendment and shall be 
considered as read. The rule waives all points of order against 
the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute.
    The rule makes in order only those amendments to the 
committee amendment that are preprinted in the Congressional 
Record or are pro forma amendments for the purpose of debate. 
The rule provides that each amendment printed in the 
Congressional Record may be offered only by the Member who 
cause it to be printed or a designee, and that each amendment 
shall be considered as read. Finally, the rule provides one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.

                                

```
EXHIBIT 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Circle Group Holdings,  Inc. on
Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  September  30,  2005 as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly  Report"),
I, Dana L. Dabney,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Circle Group Holdings,  Inc.
certify, pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in
all material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of
Circle Group Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  November 14, 2005
                                    By  /s/ Dana L. Dabney
                                        ------------------
                                        Dana L. Dabney
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 24(d)**

 

AMERIPRISE CERTIFICATE COMPANY

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

City of Minneapolis

 

State of Minnesota

 

The undersigned, as a director of Ameriprise Certificate Company, a face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, hereby constitutes and appoints William F. (Ted) Truscott, Ross P. Palacios, David K. Stewart, Scott R. Plummer and Christopher O. Petersen or any one of them, as her attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign for her in her name, place and stead any and all registration statements and amendments thereto (with all exhibits and other documents required or desirable in connection therewith) that may be prepared from time to time in connection with said Company’s existing or future face-amount certificate products — whether pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Investment Company Act of 1940 or otherwise — and periodic and other reports, and amendments thereto, including those on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, as required pursuant to provisions of applicable federal securities laws, and any necessary or appropriate filings with states or other jurisdictions, and grants to any or all of them the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act required or necessary or appropriate in connection with such signatures or filings.

 

Signed on this 14 day of February, 2011

 

 
| /s/   Lorna P. Gleason |   |
|------------------------|--------|
| Lorna   P. Gleason     |   |

 

----
Petition for Commercial Drone

I’m submitting my request for the ability for the use of a drone for the following use....

 I’m presently training pilots for the use of drones under the sport pilot minimum

 As an existing pilot and instructor I can better serve the public as drone pilot 

 I’m experience in the conduct of a pilot regulations and operational needs of coordinating with 

the proper authorities

 I would be operating with the realty and commercial markets

George Grall

(262) 378-9143
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.2


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Medical Products,
Inc. (the "Corporation") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, the Corporate Controller and Principal Financial
Officer of the Corporation, hereby certifies:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.


/s/ Elaine Swygert
---------------------------------
Elaine Swygert
Corporate Controller and
Principal Financial Officer

November 14, 2003


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,
or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Horizon Medical
Products, Inc. and will be retained by Horizon Medical Products, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GEORGE SPITTAL, )

) 2:04-cv-1198-GEB-DAD-PS

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 

) ORDER

JAY SCHENIRER, et al., ) 

)

Defendants. )

)

Plaintiff’s motion filed December 21, 2005, is

unintelligible and is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 27, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01198-GEB-DAD Document 52 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 1
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Business Reports: Adjustment Activity (FI)

To view the adjustment activity (FI) report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, click Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Business Reports, click Adjustment Activity (FI). The Adjustment Activity (FI)

parameters page appears.

3. Enter your search criteria.

• Select the Adjustment Type, required

• Select the Adjustment Reason

• Enter the From: and To: Voucher Date range

• Enter the From: and To: Original Date of Deposit range

• Enter the ALC (Agency Location Code)

• Enter the RTN (Routing Transit Number) 

• Enter the DDA (Demand Deposit Account)

• Enter the From: and To: Adjustment Amount range

• Enter the From: and To: Deposit Date range

• Enter the CAN (CA$HLINK II Account Number)

• Enter the CA$HLINK II Trace #

• The date range for Voucher Date, Original Date of Deposit, and Deposit Date

cannot exceed 15 months.

• Click Yes or No for Report With Children.

• Click Yes to generate a report that contains data for the selected OTC Endpoint and 

the lower level OTC Endpoints. 

• Click No to generate a report that contains data only for the selected OTC Endpoint.

Application Tip

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

4. Click an OTC Endpoint to initiate the report. The Adjustment Activity (FI) preview page 

appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Adjustments Activity (FI) Preview Page

• TGA denotes a deposit processing OTC Endpoint.

• CHK denotes a check capture OTC Endpoint.

• M denotes a mapped accounting code; an open lock denotes access permission; 

and a closed lock denotes no access permission.

• CDC denotes card processing OTC Endpoint.

5. Under Export as, you have the following options:

• Select PDF, Excel or Word format

• Click Download

Or

• Click Print PDF Report

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

All adjustments associated with Deposits with an original voucher date older than 5

years and Returned Item Adjustments with an adjustment voucher date older than 5

years are archived to the archive database, according to the Fiscal Service data 

retention policy. These transactions are viewable through the Historical Reports page 

(Home>Reports>Historical Reports).

Click Previous to return to the previous page.

Application Tip

Additional Button
# sec4_attribtable_2019

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2019-14	&"Arial,Bold"&9IV AT - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10DraftIRC Handout July 2019
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gregory CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-30114.

D.C. No. CR-98-00279-KI.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 8, 2001 *.

Decided March 19, 2001.

*463Before T.G. NELSON, GRABER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

To be entitled to a Franks1 hearing, Campbell “must first make a substantial preliminary showing that the affidavit contained a misleading omission and that the omission resulted from a deliberate or reckless disregard of the truth. Second, he must demonstrate that had there been no omission, the affidavit would have been insufficient to establish probable cause.”2 We need not undertake the second inquiry, because Campbell’s claim does not survive the first.3

“ Whether ... omissions are intentional or reckless is a factual finding reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard.’ ”4 In holding that “there is no evidence that Lawrence’s failure to report Hicks’ criminal record was either intentional or reckless,” the district court did not clearly err. The uncontroverted evidence shows that Lawrence did not obtain Hicks’ criminal record until four days after obtaining the search warrant. Campbell believes that Lawrence either chose not to run Hicks’ record, or that he ran Hicks’ record but intentionally withheld this information from the affidavit. The first proposition, even if true, does not require a hearing.5 The second, of course, would, *464if supported by evidence, but Campbell proffers none. He “disbelieves [Lawrence], but that disbelief does not amount to the substantial showing required under Franks.”6

Because Campbell did not make a substantial preliminary showing that the omission was made either recklessly or intentionally, the district court did not err.

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

1

. *Franks v. Delaware,*438 U.S. 154, 98 S.Ct. 2674, 57 L.Ed.2d 667 (1978).

2

. *United States v. Collins,*61 F.3d 1379, 1384 (9th Cir.1995).

3

. *Compare United States v. Hall,*113 F.3d 157, 159 (9th Cir.1997) (deciding the second issue when the Government conceded the first).

4

. *United States v. Bertrand,*926 F.2d 838, 842 (9th Cir.1991) (quoting *United States v. Dozier,*844 F.2d 701, 705 (9th Cir.1988)).

5

. *United States v. Miller,*753 F.2d 1475, 1478 (9th Cir.1985) (holding that although “[fit might have been prudent for, the federal agents to check on the [confidential informant's] background and criminal record, ... *464their failure to do so is not reckless disregard").

6

. *United States v. Meling,*47 F.3d 1546, 1554 (9th Cir.1995).
EXHIBIT
32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's
position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more
fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: May
12, 2008





BY:/s/ Leo
Liebowitz


(Signature)


LEO
LIEBOWITZ


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1223 KA 13-01583**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

FRANCIS S. SMITH, ALSO KNOWN AS FRANCIS SMITH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 1.)

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (ALAN WILLIAMS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C. Noonan, J.), rendered May 2, 2013. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1 and appeal No. 2, defendant appeals from separate judgments convicting him upon his pleas of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]). Both pleas were entered during one plea proceeding, during which defendant waived his right to appeal. We reject defendant’s challenge in each appeal to the validity of the waiver of the right to appeal. “The written waiver of the right to appeal, together with defendant’s responses during the plea proceeding, establish that the waiver was voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently entered” ( People v Griner , 50 AD3d 1557, 1558, lv denied 11 NY3d 737; see People v Ramos , 7 NY3d 737, 738). The valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses defendant’s challenge in each appeal to the severity of the sentence, including the period of postrelease supervision ( see People v Raynor , 107 AD3d 1567, 1568, lv denied 22 NY3d 1090; People v McMullen , 94 AD3d 1434, 1434-1435, lv denied 19 NY3d 964; People v Laskowski , 46 AD3d 1383, 1384). Although defendant’s challenge in each appeal to the validity of the orders of protection issued by County Court survives his waiver of the right to appeal ( see People v Smith , 83 AD3d 1213, 1214; People v Victor , 20 AD3d 927, 928, lv denied 5 NY3d 833, reconsideration denied 5 NY3d 885), he failed to preserve those challenges for our review inasmuch as he did not object to the orders of protection either during the plea proceeding or at sentencing ( see People v Russell , 120 AD3d 1594, 1594-1595; Smith , 83**-2- 1223 KA 13-01583** 
AD3d at 1213-1214). Indeed, defense counsel specifically advised the court that defendant had no objection to entry of the orders at issue. We therefore decline to exercise our power to review defendant’s challenges as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]).

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
### Open-File Report 97-500

# A DIGITAL VERSION OF THE 1970 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OFTHE SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGION, THREE SHEETS, 1:125,000

### By: Douglas S. Aitken

### 1997



---

Notes:

- General Help   | PDF help with downloads
- Disclaimers

---



### 1. Documentation files

Download the documentation file:



---



### 2. Topographic map database (spatial and attribute GIS) files:

A. Download all the topographic map database layers and supporting materials in ARC/INFO 7.x ASCII EXPORT format, by sheet, packaged in a single UNIX tar file, compressed with gzip:

#### - OR -



---
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Recover a Batch

To recover a batch, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, select Utilities>Batch Utilities>Batch Recovery. The 

Review Recovery page appears.

The Recover Batch function supports the recovery of batches containing transactions 

with associated accounting codes from secondary storage.

2. Click Submit as shown in Figure 1. The Percentage Complete dialog box appears.

Figure 1: Batch Recovery Review

Wait until the display percent completion reaches 100% before clicking Close. 

3. Click Close. The Review page presents the total number of batches that were successfully 

recovered from the secondary storage.

• If the Cancel button is clicked before the batch recovery is complete, a dialog box 

appears asking if you want to cancel the batch recovery. 

• Click Yes to cancel the batch recovery.

• Click No to continue recovering the batch.

• Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

Application Tip

Application Tip

Additional Buttons
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3


Summary of 2016 Nonemployee Director Compensation Program
IHS Markit Ltd.


Director Compensation


Our nonemployee directors receive compensation for their service on our Board of Directors.  Each of our nonemployee directors receives annual cash retainers and equity awards, as described in the table below.  The retainers received by the nonemployee directors may be converted into deferred stock units. 


	
			
	Annual Director Compensation
	 
	$

	Board Retainer
	 
	90,000

	Lead Independent Director Retainer
	 
	50,000

	Committee Chair Retainer:
	 
	 

	Nominating and Governance Committee
	 
	17,500

	All Other Committees
	 
	30,000

	Committee Member Retainer:
	 
	 

	Audit Committee
	 
	15,000

	All Other Committees
	 
	10,000

	Annual Equity Award (1)
	 
	180,000

	 
	 
	 

	(1) On December 1 of each year of service, each nonemployee director shall receive an award consisting of restricted stock units whose underlying shares shall have, on the date of grant, a fair market value equal to $180,000.  Directors may choose to defer receipt of the shares underlying the RSUs until after their termination of service.






Certain directors were awarded a special equity grant reflecting the pro rata portion of the annual equity award for the period of the 2016 fiscal year they served as directors of IHS Markit. 


All equity awards for nonemployee directors will be issued pursuant to the IHS Markit Ltd. 2014 Equity Incentive Award Plan.


We provide liability insurance for our directors and officers. In addition, our nonemployee directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: November 1, 2010





BY:/s/ David Driscoll


(Signature)


DAVID DRISCOLL


President and Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer

          Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

          (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended September 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's position prevailing
in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more fully described in
the Report); and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 7, 2005                 BY: /s/ Leo Liebowitz
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            (Signature)
                                            LEO LIEBOWITZ
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the
Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes
of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.