alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1The Honorable Lawerence L. Piersol, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the District of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-3651

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

v. * Western District of Arkansas.

*

Darla Elmore, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: April 10, 2001

Filed: April 13, 2001 

___________

Before BOWMAN and FAGG, Circuit Judges, and PIERSOL,1 District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After Darla Elmore's motion to suppress was denied, she entered a conditional

plea of guilty to one count of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine and

was sentenced to thirty-seven months of imprisonment. She appeals, seeking reversal

of the denial of her motion.
2The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court

for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendation of

Honorable Beverly S. Jones, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District

of Arkansas.

-2-

Having reviewed the matter, we conclude that the District Court2 did not err in

denying Elmore's suppression motion. We agree with the District Court that (1) the

search of Elmore's vehicle was valid based on probable cause and as a proper search

incident to arrest, and (2) the inventory search of Elmore's vehicle the morning after her

arrest was lawful because the vehicle had been properly seized for forfeiture.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4278 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4278

    To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
  regulations to ensure due process rights for physicians before any 
termination, restriction, or reduction of the professional activity of 
        such physicians or staff privileges of such physicians.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 8, 2024

  Mr. Marshall (for himself and Ms. Warren) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to issue 
  regulations to ensure due process rights for physicians before any 
termination, restriction, or reduction of the professional activity of 
        such physicians or staff privileges of such physicians.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Physician and Patient Safety Act''.

SEC. 2. REGULATIONS TO ENSURE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS FOR PHYSICIANS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 
issue final regulations to provide that physicians who have been 
granted medical staff privileges at a hospital have a fair hearing and 
appellate review through appropriate medical staff mechanisms before 
any termination, restriction, or reduction of the professional activity 
of such physicians or staff privileges of such physicians at such 
hospital.
    (b) Requirements of Regulations.--The regulations described in 
subsection (a) shall provide that--
            (1) a hearing or appellate review may not be denied through 
        a third-party contract;
            (2) a physician shall not be requested or required to waive 
        their rights to such a hearing or appellate review as a 
        condition of employment, either with the hospital or with a 
        third-party contractor; and
            (3) any such hearing or appellate review shall be 
        confidential and not reportable to any entity, including the 
        National Practitioner Data Bank or future workplaces or 
        employers, unless there is an ongoing threat to patient safety, 
        or as otherwise required under the reporting requirements for 
        hospitals established by the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    (c) Effective Date.--The final regulations promulgated under 
subsection (a) shall take effect not later than 18 months after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50313

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN MORA-RIVAS, also known as Juan Sandoval-Martinez

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 2:06-CR-73-ALL

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Mora-Rivas

raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty

provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v.

Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug.

28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 5, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WALTER MAURICE SAVAGE,

Petitioner,

v.

W. DUNCAN, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV S-04-1079 MCE PAN P

[PROPOSED] ORDER

 Respondent has file a request for an enlargement of time to file a response to the petition

for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to this court’s order of March 17, 2005.

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ordered that:

 1. Respondent’s request for an enlargement of time is granted;

 2. Respondent shall file and serve a response to the petition within thirty days from the

date of this order.

Dated: May 17, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01079-MCE -PAN Document 11 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 1
Office lease with GNS Family Partnership, LLC





Exhibit 10.1

COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT

 

This Commercial Lease Agreement is made and effective, July 6, 2006 by and between GNS Family Partnership LLC, (“Landlord”) and The GNS Group, Inc. (“Tenant”).

Landlord is the owner of the land and improvements commonly known as: 4017 Colby Avenue, Everett, WA 98201.

Landlord desires to lease the Leased Premises to Tenant and Tenant desires to lease the Leased Premises from Landlord for a term, at the rental and upon the covenants, conditions, and provisions herein set forth:

Term: - The term of this lease shall be for a period of three (3) years beginning July 6, 2006 and ending July 5, 2009.

Rental: - Tenant shall pay to Landlord the monthly sum of $4,000 due and payable on or before the 1st of each month.

Use: - The leased premises shall be used for offices and as a showroom for furniture.

Repairs: - During the Lease Term, Tenant shall make, at Tenant’s expense, all necessary repairs to the Leased Premises.

Property Taxes: - The payment of all property taxes shall be the responsibility of the Tenant.

Governing Law: - Tenant shall comply with all laws governing the use of the Leased Premises.

This Agreement shall be governed, construed and interpreted through and under the State of Washington.

 

ROULA JARJOUR

By: Roula Jarjour

GNS Family Partnership LLC

 

ANTOINE JARJOUR

By: Antoine Jarjour

The GNS Group, Inc.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual Report of Interdyne  Company (the  "Company") on
Form  10-KSB  for the  fiscal  year  ending  June 30,  2005,  as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

September 23, 2005

                                        By:   /s/ Sun Tze Whang
                                                Sun Tze Whang
                                                Chief Executive Officer

September 23, 2005

                                        By:  /s/ Kit H. Tan
                                                Kit H. Tan
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Activate/Deactivate a Batch

To activate/deactivate a batch, complete the following steps:

1. From the Check Processing tab, click Batch Management. The Search Batch page appears.

2. Select or enter the batch search conditions you would like view.

Under Batch Search Conditions, optional

o Select the OTC Endpoint you want to activate/deactivate a batch for by checking 

the box under the Select column

Only batches with an Open or Closed status can be activated/deactivated. Additionally, 

batches currently in use cannot be deactivated.

Under Created On Date, optional

o Enter the From and To date range

• The From and To Created On Date must be entered in MM/DD/YYYY format.

• The Created On Date range cannot exceed 30 days. Additionally, if more than 1,000 

batches are created within 30 days, then only the most recent 1,000 batches appear.

• When running a search with the default From and To Created On Date range 

values, the search results include the most recent 30 days of batches that you have 

access to view. If more than 1,000 batches are created within the 30 days, then only 

the most recent 1,000 batches appear.

• When running a search without specifying any criteria (with the exception of the 

Batch ID field), the search results include the most recent 30 days of batches that 

you have access to view. If more than 1,000 batches are created within 30 days, 

then only the most recent 1,000 batches appear.

o Enter the Batch ID, optional

If the only search criteria entered is a valid Batch ID, then only a single result appears 

regardless of other search criteria specified.

o Enter the Cashier ID

Application Tip

Application Tips

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Under Batch Status, optional

o Select the Status you want to activate/deactivate by checking the Open and/or 

Closed boxes under the Select column

Only batches with an Open or Closed status can be activated/deactivated. Additionally, 

batches currently in use cannot be deactivated.

3. Click Search. The Summary of Batches page appears.

4. Check the checkbox of the Batch ID you want to activate or deactivate and click 

Activate/Deactivate. The Activate/Deactivate Batch page appears, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. View Batches Page (Activate/Deactivate)

If a batch is activated or deactivated a check appears under the Active Flag column. If a 

batch is deactivated, the Active Flag column is blank.

5. Click Confirm. A message appears stating the batch(es) have been 

activated/deactivated and the value under Active Status updates to Active/Inactive.

• Click Return to Batch Summary to return to the batch summary page.

• Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet homepage.

Application Tip

Application Tip

Additional Buttons
(Reap. Dec. 10059)

#### Innocenti Corporation *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 31763; 37445; 37816.

(Decided August 9, 1961)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*William S. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made a part of this decision, present the question of the proper value for dutiable purposes of certain motor-scooters, plus extras..

The parties hereto have submitted the appeals for decision on a stipulation of fact which reads as follows :

> That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement set forth in the Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof consists of motorscooters, plus extras, exported from Italy during 1959.

> That at the times of export such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Italy for home consumption or for export ..to, the. United States, nor was.it freely offered .for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the United States for domestic consumption.

> That “cost of pfddücttón” á's defined in Section-402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 for such merchandise at the time immediately preceding the date of exportation was as follows: : ‘

> For Model 150/LI — Lira 121,375.00, plus éxtras, as invoiced, net.

*436Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is the proper basis of value for the instant motorscooters, plus extras, and that said value is as follows:

> For Model 150/LI — Lira 121,375.00, plus extras, as invoiced, net.

As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
AMERICAN EXPRESS CERTIFICATE COMPANY
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

City of Minneapolis

State of Minnesota

Each of the undersigned as an officer of American Express Certificate Company, a
face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940, hereby constitutes and appoints Paula R. Meyer, Teresa J. Rasmussen, H.
Bernt von Ohlen, Walter S. Berman and Jeryl A. Millner or any one of them, as
his or her attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign for him or her in his or her
name, place and stead any and all registration statements and amendments thereto
(with all exhibits and other documents required or desirable in connection
therewith) that may be prepared from time to time in connection with said
Company's existing or future face-amount certificate products, and periodic
reports on Form 10-K. Form 10-Q and Form 8-K required pursuant to provisions of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any necessary or appropriate states or
other jurisdictions, and grants to any or all of them the full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act required or necessary or
appropriate in connection with such signatures or filings.

Signed on this 3rd day of March, 2004



/s/ Paula R. Meyer
--------------------------
    Paula R. Meyer


/s/ Walter S. Berman
--------------------------
    Walter S. Berman


/s/ Jeryl A. Millner
--------------------------
    Jeryl A. Millner
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3598]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-125-001]


Columbia Gulf Transmission Company; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 23, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 21, 2007, Columbia Gulf Transmission 
Company (Columbia Gulf) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas 
Tariff, Second Revised Volume No. 1, Second Revised Sheet No. 289, to 
be effective February 1, 2007.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bef8fbecfdf1d0d2d7d0dbedcbceced1cccafed8dbccdd90d9d1c8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4f090a1d0c00212326212a1c3a3f3f203d3b0f292a3d2c61282039">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3598 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Welcome
 Training Module Topics Below are the training topics you need to manage users in ISIM and view reports in OTCnet. Click **Expand All** to view all resources for your role, or click the arrow next to a module to view the lesson(s) and resources. You can choose to view Web Based Training (WBT) modules, certificates are assigned for critical tasks and are noted by the certificate icon Certificate icon. You can also review Printable Job Aids (PJAs) and Videos that support your OTCnet user training.  Expand All
  GETTING STARTED  1.1 OTCnet Overview
            PJA
            VideoOTCnet Overview
 MODULE 2: ACCESSING OTCnet Certificate icon2.1 Start and Stop the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB) Application
            PJA
            VideoStart and Stop the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB) ApplicationCertificate icon2.2 Request Your OTCnet AccessSelf-Register/Create an Account in SailPoint IIQRequest Your OTCnet Access in SailPoint IIQCertificate icon2.3 Log In to OTCnet OnlineLog In to OTCnet Online
 ADMINISTRATION/CONFIGURATION MODULE 3: MANAGING USERS Certificate icon3.1 Create a User Identity
            PJA
            VideoCreate a User Identity in SailPoint IIQCertificate icon3.2 Add or Remove User AccessAdd User Access in SailPoint IIQRemove User Access in SailPoint IIQCertificate icon3.3 Approve or Deny User Access RequestApprove or Deny User Access Requests in SailPoint IIQCertificate icon3.4 Import User Identity to OTCnetImport User Identity to OTCnetCertificate icon3.5 Add or Remove an Endpoint/Role for a UserAdd an Endpoint/Role for a User in OTCnetRemove an Endpoint/Role for a User in OTCnetCertificate icon3.6 Approve or Reject an Endpoint/Role RequestApprove or Reject an Endpoint/Role Request in OTCnet
 DEPOSIT PROCESSING MODULE 17: VIEWING DEPOSIT PROCESSING AND HISTORICAL REPORTS 17.2 View a Security Report
            PJA
            VideoView Security Reports: Users by Access Group (FI)View Security Reports: Users by Access Group (FPA)View Security Reports: User InformationView Security Reports: Users by Role (FI)View Security Reports: Users by Role (FPA)
 Welcome
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 3/23/2023 1

Federal Court Intervention 

in a Party-Nomination Dispute 

Hinkleman v. New York State Board of Elections 

(David N. Hurd, N.D.N.Y. 5:08-cv-207) 

The district judge declined to resolve an intraparty dispute over 

who would be the party’s nominee in a special legislative election. 

Subject: Getting on the ballot. Topics: Getting on the ballot; 

class action; party procedures; matters for state courts; case 

assignment. 

On February 22, 2008, a voter and two organizational parts of New York’s 

Independence Party filed a federal class-action complaint in the Northern 

District of New York seeking resolution in their favor of a dispute over what 

part or parts of the party were authorized to name a nominee for a February 

26 special election to fill a vacancy in the state’s senate.1

 On the day that the 

complaint was filed, the court reassigned the case from Judge Neal P. 

McCurn to Judge David N. Hurd.2

On February 25, Judge Hurd granted a motion to intervene filed by a 

candidate opposing the candidate supported by the plaintiffs.3 Judge Hurd 

denied the plaintiffs preliminary relief.4

New York’s court of appeals, however, ruled on February 25 that the federal court intervenor could not pursue a state-court challenge against the 

federal plaintiffs’ candidate’s being listed as the Independence nominee, because the federal intervenor was not a member of the Independence Party.5

The intervenor won the election.6

Having received the desired relief in state court, the plaintiffs dismissed 

their federal action on March 19.7

1. Complaint, Hinkleman v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections, No. 5:08-cv-207 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 

22, 2008), D.E. 1. 

2. Order, id. (Feb. 22, 2008), D.E. 5. 

Judge McCurn died on September 7, 2014. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

3. Order, Hinkleman, No. 5:08-cv-207 (N.D.N.Y. Feb. 25, 2008), D.E. 7. 

4. Order, id. (Feb. 25, 2008), D.E. 8; see Intervention Motion, id. (Feb. 25, 2008), D.E. 6. 

5. In re Fehrman v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections, 10 N.Y.3d 759, 883 N.E.2d 1008, 854 

N.Y.S.2d 101 (2008); see Charles McChesney, Court Grants Barclay Independence Line, Syracuse Post-Standard, Feb. 26, 2008, at B1; Rick Karlin, GOP Gains Edge in Contest, Albany 

Times Union, Feb. 26, 2008, at A3; Jeremy W. Peters, In Race Upstate, Republican Gets a 

Second Ballot Line, N.Y. Times, Feb. 26, 2008, at 5. 

6. See Trymaine Lee, Upset Sends Democrat to Albany, N.Y. Times, Feb. 27, 2008, at 1; 

Irene Jay Liu, Senate Loss Slams State GOP, Albany Times Union, Feb. 27, 2008, at A1. 

7. Voluntary Dismissal, Hinkleman, No. 5:08-cv-207 (N.D.N.Y. Mar. 19, 2008), D.E. 10.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4242 

To extend the authorization of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought 

Relief Act of 1991, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2024 

Mr. HICKENLOOPER (for himself, Ms. LUMMIS, and Mr. WYDEN) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drought Preparedness 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION. 

7 (a) DROUGHT PROGRAM.—Section 104(c) of the Rec8 lamation States Emergency Drought Relief Act of 1991 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4242 IS

1 (43 U.S.C. 2214(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘2022’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘2028’’. 

3 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

4 301 of the Reclamation States Emergency Drought Relief 

5 Act of 1991 (43 U.S.C. 2241) is amended by striking 

6 ‘‘2022’’ and inserting ‘‘2028’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB