alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-2780

OPAL HERNANDEZ, wife of James Hernandez; JAMES

HERNANDEZ,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

versus

ARTHUR H. HOFFMAN; MARY C. HOFFMAN, wife of

Arthur H. Hoffman; RAND W. HOFFMAN; CHERYL

HOFFMAN, wife of Rand W. Hoffman; LAURA J.

WETSCH, Attorney at Law; DANNY LEE ALLEN,

Deputy Sheriff of Johnston County; R. FRANK

GRAY, Attorney at Law,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

KNOX V. JENKINS, Judge of Superior Court,

County of Johnston,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-96-543-5-BR)

Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: March 18, 1997

Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2
3

Opal Hernandez, James Hernandez, Appellants Pro Se. Ralph Frank

Gray, Laura J. Wetsch, JORDAN, PRICE, WALL, GRAY & JONES, L.L.P.,

Raleigh, North Carolina; Howard Edwards Manning, Sr., Kristen

Gardner Lingo, MANNING, FULTON & SKINNER, Raleigh, North Carolina,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court's order adopting the

magistrate judge's report and recommendation dismissing their 42

U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (1994) action. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hernandez

v. Hoffman, No. CA-96-543-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Nov. 6, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3911 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRCATED FROM
FINANCIALSTATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,149,901
<SECURITIES>                                   108,866
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     89,398
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,527,147
<PP&E>                                          35,618
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,914
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,685,936
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          724,601
<BONDS>                                        516,219
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,773
<OTHER-SE>                                     422,048
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,685,936
<SALES>                                        261,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               261,043
<CGS>                                          227,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  912,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             343,123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,221,736)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       455
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,222,191)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,222,191)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.10)



</TABLE>
August 6, 2015

Mr. James Waldon

Paramount Law Group, PLLC

1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3000

Seattle, WA 98104

Dear Mr. Waldon:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§ xx.xx of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your May 26, filed in Docket No. FAA-2015-1899, but we are unable to process 

your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 

(copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the 

following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.
2

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If

you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
3
No. 61838.

#### International Packers, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 241322-K, etc. (Laredo).

*528Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
-  Bureau of the Fiscal Service 
-  News 
- Useful Links for COVID-19 Information

# Useful Links for Economic Impact Payment Information

The  Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security ("CARES") Act was  signed into law on March 27, 2020. Among other things, the CARES Act authorizes  Economic Impact Payments (EIP) to eligible individuals. These payments are sometimes  referred to as "stimulus payments" or "recovery rebate  payments."             The Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2021,  which was signed into law on December 27, 2020, authorizes an additional round  of Economic Impact Payments to eligible individuals. 

The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021, which was signed into law on March 11, 2021, authorizes an additional round of Economic Impact Payments to eligible individuals.

**NOTE:** The IRS is delivering these payments over the coming weeks. Some payments have already been sent by direct deposit and have begun arriving in recipients’ accounts. **For the most current information on round 3 stimulus payments please visit the IRS “Get My Payment” portal**.

We want to make it  easy for our customers to get important information about the Economic Impact  Payments  by centralizing the links you’ll need to find that information  in one place.

This page provides links both to other federal government websites and to resources and information we have on our website.  It has been updated with new information and links relevant to the March 11, 2021 EIP  legislation.  More updates will be made as information becomes available.

## Treasury/IRS Information 

-  IRS Fact Sheet:  Updated Details about the third round of EIPs, 3/17/2021 
-  IRS Economic Impact Payment Information Center  
-  See Treasury and IRS press releases about EIPs  

## EIP Cards

-  Home page
-  FAQs

## Debt Collection

-  Treasury Offset Program FAQs
-  Cross Servicing FAQs

## Go Direct

-  FAQs  

## Direct Express

-  Home page
-  FAQs

## Financial Institutions

-  FAQs

## Additional Information

-  Social Security Administration 

We'll add to this page as more information becomes available, so check back frequently for updates.

Last modified 01/31/23
No. 63036.

#### Silberstein-Neulander Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 834888-G (New York).

*372Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates similar in all material respects to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C.D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in O. D. 1643, *supra.*
No. 49996.

#### Protest 108751 — K of Chas. M. McLean (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From an examination of the record the court found nothing to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action. The protest was therefore overruled.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GRACE LAWRENCE : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

TRANS UNION, LLC : NO. 02-4440

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of March, 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that a settlement conference is scheduled before the

undersigned on Wednesday, April 7, 2004 at 10:00 a.m. in Room

3029, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 

19106.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that trial counsel, clients and

any other person necessary to negotiate and agree to a settlement

shall appear in person at said conference. 

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT:

 

BY: Juanita M. Davis DIANE M. WELSH

 Deputy Clerk UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copy faxed on 3/3/04 to:

John Soumilas, Esq.

Timothy P. Creech, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 50 Filed 03/05/2004 Page 1 of 1
#### Charles Everett HASELDEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 01-6274.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 19, 2001.

Charles Everett Haselden, pro se.

*134Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Charles Everett Haselden appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. *See Haselden v. United States,*No. CA-00-897-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed Jan. 17, 2001; entered Jan. 18, 2001).* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 Even assuming Haselden could raise a claim under *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), in his § 2241 petition, his sentence was below the statutory maximum. *See United States v. Kinter,*235 F.3d 192, 199-200 (4th Cir.2000), *cert.*denied, — U.S. —, 121 S.Ct. 1393, — L.Ed.2d —, 2001 WL 185105 (U.S. March 19, 2001) (No. 00-8591); *United States v. Lewis,*235 F.3d 215, 219 (4th Cir.2000) (applying a plain error standard of review). Thus, any such claim would lack merit.
June 10, 2015

Mr. Charlie Dinges Icon Dips, LLC

302 Brookstone Dr SE Rochester, MN 55904

Dear Mr. Dinges:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 11, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015- 1307), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
No. 54632.

#### Colonial Bead Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 107049-K (New York).

*265Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 78, C. A. D. 401), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

EMILIO ESTEVEZ, 

Claimant-Appellant

v.

DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs, 

Respondent-Appellee

______________________

2023-2284

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 20-8637, Judge Coral Wong 

Pietsch, Chief Judge Margaret C. Bartley, Judge Scott 

Laurer. 

______________________

O R D E R

The parties having so agreed, it is ordered that:

(1) The proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed. R. App. 

P. 42 (b).

Case: 23-2284 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 12/18/2023
2 ESTEVEZ V. MCDONOUGH 

(2) Each side shall bear their own costs.

FOR THE COURT

December 18, 2023

Date

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: December 18, 2023

Case: 23-2284 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 12/18/2023
----

(2006/C 249/40)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 237, 30.9.2006

Past publications

OJ C 224, 16.9.2006

OJ C 212, 2.9.2006

OJ C 190, 12.8.2006

OJ C 178, 29.7.2006

OJ C 165, 15.7.2006

OJ C 154, 1.7.2006

These texts are available on:

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRCATED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          87,641
<SECURITIES>                                    47,459
<RECEIVABLES>                                  197,217
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    487,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,034,746
<PP&E>                                          35,276
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,302,349
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          362,184
<BONDS>                                        440,973
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,865
<OTHER-SE>                                     477,128
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,302,349
<SALES>                                      1,724,617
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,724,617
<CGS>                                        1,020,496
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,744,038
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             458,634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,498,551)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       455
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,499,006)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,499,006)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.117)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.117)



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUAN CE OF HEARING CASE NO. CIV. S 04-0896 LKK PAN

GIRARD & VINSON, LLP

CHRISTIAN M. KEINER, SBN 95144

MICHELLE L. CANNON, SBN 172680

1006 Fourth Street, Eighth Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814-3326

Telephone: (916) 446-9292

Facsimile: (916) 446-5711 

Attorneys for Defendant

AUBURN UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK P., A minor, By and Through JESSICA

P., His Guardian Ad Litem,

Plaintiff,

v.

AUBURN UNION ELEMENTARY

SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CIV. S 04-0896 LKK PAN

Date: May 23, 2005

Time: 10:00 a.m.

Place: Courtroom 4

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR

CONTINUANCE OF HEARING

TO THE HONORABLE LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, PRESIDING JUDGE:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for Jack P., a minor,

by and through Jessica P., his guardian ad litem, and Auburn Union Elementary School District that

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

. . .

Case 2:04-cv-00896-LKK -PAN Document 40 Filed 05/05/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR CONTINUAN CE OF HEARING CASE NO. CIV. S 04-0896 LKK PAN

the current hearing date of May 23, 2005, be postponed and continued to June 13, 2005, at 10:00

a.m., because May 23, 2005, is a date counsel for the Auburn Union Elementary School District is

scheduled to appear in another matter before the Public Employment Relations Board.

GIRARD & VINSON, LLP

Dated: May 5, 2005. /signature on original

CHRISTIAN M. KEINER

Attorneys for AUBURN UNION ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

DISTRICT

VARMA & CLANCY

Dated: _____________________. /signature on original

BOB VARMA

Attorneys for JACK P., A minor, By and Through

JESSICA P., His Guardian Ad Litem

O R D E R

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing is continued to June 13, 2005 at 10:00 a.m.

in Courtroom No. 4.

Dated: May 5, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton

Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

Senior Judge

United States District Court

Case 2:04-cv-00896-LKK -PAN Document 40 Filed 05/05/05 Page 2 of 2
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Approve or Return a Deposit to Draft

To approve a deposit or return a deposit to draft, complete the following steps:

1. From the Deposit Processing tab, click View Deposits. The View Deposits page appears. 

To locate deposits, you can also select Search Deposits.

2. From the Select Display drop-down menu, select My Deposits in Process.

3. Click the Voucher Number for the deposit details you want to process.

• There are two sections on the View Deposits page. The My Deposits in Process

section displays your current deposits. 

• The Deposit Transactions section displays your deposit history. 

• Depending on your user role, the page displays deposits on the My Deposits in 

Process page. 

• For the Viewer only role, the My Deposits in Process does not appear.

4. Review the details and click Return to Draft, as shown in Figure 1 or Submit as shown in 

Figure 2 to process the deposit awaiting approval. The Confirmation page appears,

confirming the deposit was submitted to your Financial Institution.

Application Tip

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1. Return Deposit to Draft Status
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 2. Submit Deposit
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

4

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• Click Return to Draft—the deposit voucher returns to Draft status. A Deposit 

Preparer can modify the deposit.

• Click Submit. The deposit is submitted to your Financial Institution and the OTCnet 

Deposit Ticket displays, followed by the Print dialog box—it prompts you to print 

your deposit ticket. 

• Ensure the deposit ticket is printed and included with the items sent to the bank for 

deposit.

• You cannot modify a deposit after it is submitted. Only a Deposit Confirmer from a 

Financial Institution can modify deposits by creating adjustments.

• Click Adjust to adjust a deposit.

• Click Cancel to return to the OTCnet Home Page. No data is saved. 

• Click Confirm to confirm a deposit.

• Click Next to advance to the next page.

• Click Print Deposit Ticket to print a formatted deposit ticket.

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

• Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page. 

• Click Reject to reject a deposit (visible if a user has Deposit Confirmer privileges) .

• Click View Voucher Event Log to view the history of the deposit voucher.

Application Tips

Additional Buttons
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSEPH MARINO

02-4488

District Court Docket Number

vs.

KENT LINE INTERNATIONAL, et al

Notice of Appeal Filed 10/28/03

Court Reporter(s)/ESR Operator(s) esr

Filing Fee:

 Notice of Appeal x Paid Not Paid Seaman

 Docket Fee X Paid Not Paid USA/VI

CJA Appointment (Attach Copy of Order)

 Private Attorney

 Defender Association or Federal Public Defender

 Motion Pending

Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis status, if applicable: (Attach copy of the Order)

 Motion Granted

 Motion Denied

 Motion pending before district judge

Certificate of probable cause (state habeas corpus): (Attach copy of the Order)

 Granted

 Denied

 Pending

 Defendant's Address (for criminal appeals)

 

 Prepared by : 

Patricia Horning 10/28/03

Deputy Clerk Signature/Date

PLEASE APPEND TO THE NOTICE OF APPEAL AND FORWARD TO

THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

notapp.frm

Case 2:02-cv-04488-BMS Document 71 Filed 10/28/2003 Page 1 of 1