alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TODD AVARA, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1044 MCE DAD P

vs.

DARREL G. ADAMS, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has filed a second request for appointment of counsel. As set forth in

the court’s order filed August 2, 2004, and docketed as #7, there is no absolute right to

appointment of counsel in federal habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460

(9th Cir. 1996). Counsel may be appointed at any stage of the case “if the interests of justice so

require.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A. See also Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. The court

does not find that the interests of justice require appointment of counsel in this case. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that petitioner’s January 30, 2006 request for

appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: February 9, 2006.

DAD:13:bb

avar1044.110s

Case 2:04-cv-01044-ALA Document 38 Filed 02/09/06 Page 1 of 1
1 { 

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

{ }

•
2 { }

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION { 

} 

•

 
3 { }

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION {

} 

•

 
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

{ } 
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

{

) 
6 { }

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION {

} 
7 { }

CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION{ }
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warning Model  Management,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10QSB for the period  ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Rudolph,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company and  Stanley  Tepper,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted  pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that, to the
best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                       /s/  Michael Rudolph
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Michael Rudolph
                                       Chief Executive Officer, President
                                       and Chief Accounting Officer
                                       August 19, 2003





<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8001-8002]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2942]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Office of the Secretary


Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council; Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of the Interior.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary is 
announcing a public meeting of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public 
Advisory Committee.

DATES: March 2, 2007, at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council Office, 441 West 5th 
Avenue, Suite 500, Anchorage, Alaska.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Douglas Mutter, Department of the 
Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 1689 ``C'' 
Street, Suite 119, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, (907) 271-5011.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Public Advisory Committee was created by 
Paragraph V.A.4 of the Memorandum of Agreement and Consent Decree 
entered into by the United States of America and the State of Alaska on 
August 27, 1991, and approved by the United States District Court for 
the District of Alaska in settlement of United States of America v. 
State of Alaska, Civil Action No. A91-081 CV. The meeting agenda will 
include a

[[Page 8002]]

discussion of the mission and vision for the restoration program, and a 
review of pending proposals for inclusion in the fiscal year 2007 work 
plan.

Willie R. Taylor,
Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.
 [FR Doc. E7-2942 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-RG-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30,
1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,797
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,642
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,953
<INVENTORY>                                      1,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                59,981
<PP&E>                                          91,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,787
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 127,302
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,359
<BONDS>                                         64,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            66
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,517
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   127,302
<SALES>                                        144,972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               224,675
<CGS>                                          115,416
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  192,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,496
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,721
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,422
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (483)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,939
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .68


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

Nos. 04-22-00645-CR, 04-22-00646-CR

Hayward Charlie THOMAS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2016-CR-7439, 2017-CR-2286

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED January 17, 2024.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2024 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-04	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 2/15/23
Exhibit 32.2

                      Statement of Chief Financial Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

August 13, 2003                      /s/ Gary F. Hoskins
------------------                   ---------------------------------
Dated                                Gary F. Hoskins
                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                       24
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sherwood Brands, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending October 31, 2002 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Uziel Frydman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 

Dated: December 12, 2003

 

 
|                                             | /s/ Uziel Frydman |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|-------------------|--------|
| Uziel Frydman                                    |
| Chairman, President and Chief Executive  Officer |

 

1

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Glenn T. Mason,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1123 FCD PAN P

vs. Order

M. Sandham, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoThe court’s June 28, 2005, order required discovery

responses within 45 days after service of a discovery request. 

August 25, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion, signed July 18,

2005, for an order compelling responses to discovery served July

10, 2005. 

Defendants opposed the motion to compel September 6, 2005,

submitting evidence they timely responded to discovery August 19,

2005. Plaintiff did not reply. The motion to compel is moot.

June 20, 2005, plaintiff moved for leave to amend the 

Case 2:04-cv-01123-FCD-EFB Document 56 Filed 12/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

complaint but did not submit a proposed amended complaint.

August 31 and September 28, 2005, plaintiff moved to appoint

counsel. I will not appoint counsel for reasons explained in my

March 17, 2005, order.

Accordingly, the court hereby orders that:

1. Plaintiff’s August 25, 2005, motion to compel is denied.

2. Plaintiff’s June 20, 2005, motion to amend is denied.

3. Plaintiff’s August 31 and September 28, 2005, motions to

appoint counsel are denied.

Dated: December 27, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01123-FCD-EFB Document 56 Filed 12/28/05 Page 2 of 2
16.01
EXHIBIT 21
<TABLE>
                    DAIN RAUSCHER CORPORATION
            (Formerly Interra Financial Incorporated)
          LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997
<CAPTION>
                                                       Percentage
                                                        of Voting
                                       State in Which  Securities
Name                                    Incorporated      Owned
----                                   --------------   ---------
<S>                                       <C>              <C>
Consolidated subsidiaries of
  Registrant:
Dain Bosworth Incorporated*               Delaware         100%
Interra Advisory Services Inc**           Minnesota        100
Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc.*            Delaware         100
Interra Clearing Services Inc.*           Minnesota        100
Dain Rauscher Lending Services Inc.       Minnesota        100

<FN>

* Merged into Dain Rauscher Incorporated, a wholly owned
Minnesota
corporation, during the first quarter of 1998.

** Renamed Insight Investment Management, Inc. on January 2,
1998.

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Cyco.net,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

            1.    The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operation of the Company.


                  By:  /s/   Richard A. Urrea         August 20, 2004
                       --------------------------
                  Richard A. Urrea
                  President and Chief Executive Officer
28 June 2013

Richard Payton

8P-AR

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region VIII

1595 Wynkoop Street

Denver, CO 80202-1129

Dear Richard:

Enclosed is the Exceptional Event report for the high wind/blowing dust episode that occurred on April 5, 2010 

in Alamosa, Pagosa Springs and Durango, Colorado. Data for this event are flagged on AQS, as required. This 

report, and the analysis and data contained within it, clearly shows that this exceptional event passed the four 

required tests under 40 CFR 50.14 (3)(iv).

This report was made available for public comment on our website from May 28 through June 27, 2013, and 

was also distributed to potentially interested parties. Some minor non-substantiative external comments were 

received and corrections have been made to the report. Some non-substantiative and formatting changes were

also made to the report by the Air Pollution Control Division.

We respectfully request a review of this exceptional event report and concurrence by EPA on this natural high 

wind/blowing dust event.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Gordon E. Pierce

Program Manager

Technical Services Program

Air Pollution Control Division

cc. Deirdre Rothery, EPA

Lisa Clarke, APCD

Kaitlin Stabrava, APCD

Pat McGraw, APCD

Pat Reddy, APCD

Terry Furuli, APCD
Before the First Division,

February 13, 1951

No. 55238.

#### A. S. Samper & Co. *v.*United States,

petition 6747-R (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

At the trial it was disclosed that the twine involved was invoiced and entry was made at 17 cents per pound, following advice from the appraiser; that subsequently, upon later advice from the examiner, the entry was amended to a basis of 17cents per pound; and that appraisement was made at a value of 18 cents per pound. It subsequently developed that the *36018-cent value returned by the appraiser was inadvertent and that 17% cents was considered by that officer to be the correct dutiable value. However, as this error was not" discovered until it was too late to be rectified, and no appeal from the appraised value was taken, it stands as the statutory dutiable value of the merchandise, and the additional duties here sought to be remitted automatically accrued. From an examination of the record the court held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted..
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ana Maria Lara v. Jose Sanchez

Appellate case number: 01-18-00025-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-19246

Trial court: 61st District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Ana Maria Lara, has filed a notice of interlocutory appeal of the trial 

court’s “Order Appointing Receiver for Cardenas Auto Sales,” signed on January 2, 

2108. And, Lara has filed an “Emergency Motion to Stay the Appointment of Receiver 

Pending Accelerated Appeal.” The motion is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: February 15, 2018
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Bonnie M. Klein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2006



/s/ Bonnie M. KleinBonnie M. KleinSenior Vice President and Treasurer(Principal Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEE ANDREW REED,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0936 LKK GGH P

vs.

S. HAFERKAMP, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff’s address recently changed although he failed to file a notice of change of

address. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all

times. The court will direct the Clerk of the Court to amend court records to reflect plaintiff’s

new address. However, if plaintiff’s address changes again and he fails to notify the court, the

court will recommend dismissal of this action. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to amend court records to reflect plaintiff’s

new address: P.O. Box 6000, Delano, CA, 93215-6000;

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00936-LKK -GGH Document 53 Filed 08/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The Clerk is directed to re-serve plaintiff with the findings and

recommendations and orders filed July 26, 2006, and August 6, 2006, which were returned

unserved.

DATED: 8/23/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:kj

ree936.add

 

Case 2:04-cv-00936-LKK -GGH Document 53 Filed 08/23/06 Page 2 of 2
**Part 2, Section II: Accounts and Definitions**

The account descriptions provide basic information about each USSGL account, including:

Account Title Account Number

Normal Balance of the Account (Debit or Credit) Account Definition

Page 1 of 1

# image1.png
Exhibit 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual Report of Israel Bank of  Agriculture  Ltd. (the
"Bank") on Form 20-F for the period  ended  December  31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  We, Lea
Patalovsky,  General  Manager  of the Bank,  and Yakov  Cohen,  Chief  Financial
Officer of the Bank,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Bank.

June 26, 2007


Lea Patalovsky
General Manager

/s/ Lea Patalovsky
----------------------


Yakov Cohen
Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Yakov Cohen
----------------------