alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK VALENZUELA, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0900 FCD DAD P

vs.

C. SMITH, M.D., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Defendants’ newly assigned counsel has requested an extension of time to file

opposition to plaintiff’s motion to compel filed April 19, 2005. Good cause appearing, the

request will be granted.

The court’s records reflect that no opposition has been filed in response to

discovery motions filed by plaintiff on April 13, 2005. The April 13, 2005 filing consists of

three motions challenging defendants’ responses to requests for admissions served by plaintiff on

each of the three defendants. Plaintiff’s proof of service indicates that the motions were served

on defendants’ counsel by mail on April 7, 2005. Defendants will be directed to file their

opposition to these discovery motions along with their opposition to the April 19, 2005 motion to

compel.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00900-FCD-DAD Document 31 Filed 05/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ May 2, 2005 request for order extending time is granted; and

2. Defendants’ opposition to the discovery motions filed by plaintiff on April 13,

2005, and April 19, 2005, shall be filed and served on or before June 14, 2005; any reply by

plaintiff shall be filed and served on or before June 24, 2005.

DATED: May 13, 2005.

DAD:13

vale0900.36mtc

Case 2:04-cv-00900-FCD-DAD Document 31 Filed 05/13/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2

ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.
                     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael J. Schall, Chief Financial Officer of Essex Property Trust,
Inc., the general partner of the registrant Essex Portfolio, L.P., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Essex Portfolio,
L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

1. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
2. The general partner's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
3. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
4. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
5. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

1. The general partner's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the general partner's auditors and the audit committee of the
general partner's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

November 14, 2003

By: /s/ MICHAEL J. SCHALL

Michael J. Schall
                  Cheif Financial Officer
                  Essex Property Trust, Inc., general partner of
                  Essex Portfolio, L.P.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 Of The United States Code**

 

I, J. Patrick Spainhour, the Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ J. Patrick  Spainhour |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | J. Patrick Spainhour      |
|   | May 13, 2010         |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ERICA FLEAGLE LEACH,

Respondent

v.

PEGGY A. DAVIS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 184 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of August, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
----

----

III Paziņojumi

Eiropas Zāļu aģentūra

----

PIEŅEMŠANA DARBĀ EIROPAS ZĀĻU AĢENTŪRĀ (LONDONĀ)

(2006/C 254 A/01)

Aģentūra atbild par medikamentu izmantošanu cilvēku ārstēšanā un veterinārijā, to novērtēšanas un pārraudzības koordinēšanu Eiropas Savienībā (skatīt Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 726/2004, kas publicēta Eiropas Savienības Oficiālajā Vēstnesī L  136 2004. gada 30. aprīlī). Eiropas Zāļu aģentūra ir dibināta 1995. gada janvārī. Tai ir cieši kontakti ar Eiropas Komisiju, ar 25 ES dalībvalstīm, EEZ-EBTA valstīm un daudzām citām grupām valsts un privātajā sektorā.

Sīkāka informācija par Eiropas Zāļu aģentūru (EMEA) un tās darbību ir atrodama internetā; mūsu adrese ir http://www.emea.europa.eu/

Eiropas Zāļu aģentūra organizē atlases procedūras, lai veidotu rezerves sarakstu šādām vietām:

Izvēlētie kandidāti tiek iekļauti rezerves sarakstā, un atkarībā no budžeta situācijas tiem var piedāvāt atjaunojamu līgumu uz pieciem gadiem saskaņā ar citu Eiropas Kopienu darbinieku nodarbinātības nosacījumiem (Eiropas Kopienu Oficiālais Vēstnesis L 56, 1968. gada 4. marts).

Darba vieta ir Londona.

Kandidātiem ir jābūt Eiropas Kopienu dalībvalstu vai Islandes, Norvēģijas vai Lihtenšteinas pilsoņiem, ar nosacījumu, ka viņiem ir visas tiesības kā pilsoņiem.

Pilnu informāciju par darba apstākļiem, amata aprakstu un nepieciešamo veidlapu lejupielādē no EMEA tīmekļa vietneshttp://www.emea.europa.eu/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htmVeidlapa ir jāparaksta, norādot datumu, un kopā ar visiem apliecinošiem dokumentiem jānosūta ne vēlāk kā līdz 2006. gada 1. decembrim (pasta zīmoga datums) uz šādu adresi:EMEA – Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, United Kingdom (tālr.: (44-207) 418 84 00; fakss: (44-207) 418 84 16).

Turpmāk Oficiālais Vēstnesis netiks automātiski izsūtīts saskaņā ar abonentu sarakstiem. Ja jūs vēlaties saņemt informāciju par publikācijām, jums jāreģistrējashttp://www.emea.europa.eu/“Online Mailing Service”.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           9,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,364
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 152,922
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,087
<BONDS>                                         35,364
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,600
<COMMON>                                         1,226
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,645
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   152,922
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,858
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,257
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                       533
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,239
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.10
        

</TABLE>
WCI recommendations to US EPA concerning Draft Subpart W 

The WCI reporting committee requests that US EPA consider adding language 

which would: 

1) provide WCI jurisdictions with the ability to require more frequent sampling 

and analysis, 

2) provide WCI the option of requiring generation of site specific data rather 

than using default or generic data and emissions factors. 

 

1) sampling frequency - WCI requests that US EPA add language which 

would allow the use of higher frequency data (where available) than that 

required by the calculation methodology. The Reporter would then use a 

weighted average to calculate data inputs at the frequency required by the 

reporting rule. The requirement to use higher frequency data (when 

available) will provide more accurate data. 

Example language: 

If results of fuel sampling and carbon analysis are available more frequently than 

required, the reporter shall calculate a weighted average value and use this data 

to calculate emissions. (For instance: when weekly fuel carbon content data are 

available, and the reporting methodology requires calculation of monthly 

emissions, the reporter shall calculate a weighted average monthly carbon 

content using the weekly carbon content and fuel consumption data.) 

∑ ∑ = =

= ∗

n

i 1

i

n

i 1

CC monthly CCi Fueli / Fuel

Where: 

 CCmonthly = weighted average monthly carbon content for fuel 

 CCi = carbon content for week i 

 Fueli = mass of volume of fuel combusted in week i 

Where is the most appropriate place to insert this language? 

1) at each location where WCI would like to require higher frequency, or 

2) at a generic location in the regulation. 

2) use of unit specific data rather than generic default data – In certain 

instances WCI would like the ability to require that reporters develop 

equipment and site specific emissions factors rather than use default or 

generic EFs.

Example language: 

§98.233(f)(1)(i) Calculation Methodology 1. For each well or for each unique 

well tubing diameter and producing horizon/formation combination in each 

gas producing field where gas wells are vented to the atmosphere................ 
In this case reporters would measure the flow from each well that is unloaded 

rather than from a single well. 

It would seem that the best approach would be to add language to require site 

specific measurement where appropriate rather than insert a generic 

provision.
# sec5_sbr_2020

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2020-21	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout July 16, 2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE ACCOMPANYING FORM
10-Q OF FRONTLINE  CAPITAL  GROUP FOR THE NINE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001052743
<NAME>                        FRONTLINE CAPITAL GROUP
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                   US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          43,999
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,661
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,897
<PP&E>                                         258,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                (48,483)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,160,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          101,128
<BONDS>                                        569,420
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           366
<OTHER-SE>                                   (188,760)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,160,182
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               321,453
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  261,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,554
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,077
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (67,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,453
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (160,028)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,648)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (161,527)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.71)



</TABLE>
55 MPH 65 MPH

Engine Torque 347.4 Nm Engine Torque

Engine Speed 1401 RPM Engine Speed

FE 14.26 MPG FE

Fuel Rate 3.366 g/s Fuel Rate 

BSFC 237.7494 g/(kW-hr) BSFC
Engine Torque 434.8 Nm

Engine Speed 1655 RPM

11.73 MPG

4.835 g/s

230.9842 g/(kW-hr)
September 30, 2010

MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: N 2 O Data from EPA Heavy - Duty Testing FROM: Angela Cullen, Engineer

Antonio Fernandez, Engineer Assessment and Standards Division TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 20 10 - 0162 This memorandum contains the results of b oth engine and vehicle FTP testing. The vehicle FTP testing values include city cycle and the highway

fuel economy

cy cle. The vehicle emission levels reflect the composite result with the city cy cle accounting for 55% and the highway accounting for 45% o f the result. Vehicle testing was performed at EPA’s National Vehicles and Fuels Emissions L ab oratory (NVFEL) . N 2 O m easurements on vehicles were made with an INNOVA 1314 Photoacoustic Multi - gas Monitor and confirmed with a Fourier Transform In f r ar ed Spec trometer (FTI R). The engine testing was performed at Southwest Research Institute for the Advanced Collaborative Emissions Study ( ACES ) , an industry

and government collaboration . Inthe ACES program, N 2 O measurements on engines over the FTP engine test cycle were made using a FT IR . All of the engines tested met the cap of 0.05 g/bhp - hr. The average of the engines was .025 g/mi. The engines included 7 tests on 4 diesel engines from Cummins, Caterpillar, Detroit Diesel and Volvo. All of the vehicles tes ted met the cap of 0.05 g/mile. The average of the vehicles was .026 g/mi. The vehicles included 10 gasoline tests and 2 diesel tests.Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine FTP N2O Emission Levels

0.0000 0.0100 0.0200 0.0300 0.0400 0.0500 0.0600

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Testsg/bhp-hr

Heavy-Duty Vehicle N2O Levels Gasoline and Diesel Heavy Duty Vehicles Composite of FTP City and HWFE tests (55/45) Emissions

0 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Testgrams/mile
# C_2019238EN.01001501.xml

| 15.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 238/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 238/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Remag Metallhandel and Jaschinsky v Commission

(Case T-631/16) (1)

(Non-contractual liability - Anti-dumping - OLAF’s insistence that Member States recover anti-dumping duties relating to any importation of silicon metal originating in Taiwan without proof that that silicon metal originated in China - Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 - Causal link)

(2019/C 238/18)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Remag Metallhandel GmbH (Steyr, Austria) and Werner Jaschinsky (St. Ulrich bei Steyr, Austria) (represented by: M. Lux, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and A. Lewis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 268 TFEU, seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the request by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) that the customs authorities of the Member States recover anti-dumping duties for consignments of silicon exported from Taiwan to the European Union.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Remag Metallhandel GmbH and Mr Werner Jaschinsky to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Remag Metallhandel GmbH and Mr Werner Jaschinsky to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JACLYN,
INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,051
<SECURITIES>                                     1,674
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                       415
<INVENTORY>                                      6,341
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,882
<PP&E>                                           1,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  25,595
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,813
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,369
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,117
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    25,595
<SALES>                                         58,766
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,297
<CGS>                                           44,873
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,777)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (998)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,779)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,779)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 16, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00819

- CV

Margarita MALDONADO

, Appellant

v.

Trenton FRANKLIN

, Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 24167

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The App ellant ’ s Mo tion to Withd raw by Mich ael McEvilly is hereby GRAN TED.

It is so ORDERED on August 16, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 May 2006 — Lavagnoli v Commission

(Case T-95/04) (1)

(Officials - Staff report - Regularity of the assessment procedure - Carrying on of activities by staff and union representative - Obligation to state reasons - Action for annulment)

(2006/C 165/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Luciano Lavagnoli (Berchem, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Curral and H. Krämer, Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the assessment exercise for the period from 1 July 1999 to 30 June 2001 as regards the applicant and of the decision adopting the applicant's definitive staff report for that period

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 106, 30.4.2004.

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

WILLIAM J. BIGGS AND 

BETTY BIGGS,

Defendants.

__________________________/

CIV S-04-1263 FCD PAN (GGH) PS

ORDER

Plaintiff and defendant William Biggs appeared before this court on July 20,

2006, for consideration of plaintiff’s motion for default judgment filed June 8, 2006. For the

reasons set forth on the record, plaintiff’s motion is denied without prejudice to plaintiff filing,

within thirty days, an amended complaint, a separate complaint, or another acceptable means and

procedure for resolving the matters addressed in plaintiff’s motion for default judgment. 

DATED: 7/25/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

________________________ 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

 U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOW6:BIGGS.30 days

Case 2:04-cv-01263-FCD-GGH Document 57 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 1
(Reap. Dec. 10715)

#### Jacky Products Corp. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 1052233 and 721667.

(Decided April 15, 1964)

*Brooks £ Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement involve certain plastic baby pants, exported from Haiti and entered at the port of New York.

Stipulated facts, upon which the case has been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question is constructed value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), and that such statutory value therefor is 0.3964 per dozen, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.