Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules 42459 

date of final approval. EPA will notify 

the State by letter that this action has 

occurred. At that time, this commitment 

will no longer be a part of the approved 

New Hampshire SIP. EPA subsequently 

will publish a document in the Federal 

Register notifying the public that the 

conditional approval automatically 

converted to a disapproval. If the State 

meets its commitment, within the 

applicable time frame, the conditionally 

approved submission will remain a part 

of the SIP until EPA takes final action 

approving or disapproving the new 

submittal. If EPA disapproves the new 

submittal, the conditionally approved 

infrastructure SIP elements will also be 

disapproved at that time. In addition, a 

final disapproval would trigger the 

Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) 

requirement under section 110(c). If 

EPA approves the new submittal, the 

PSD program and relevant infrastructure 

SIP elements will be fully approved and 

replace the conditionally approved 

program in the SIP. 

EPA is soliciting public comments on 

the issues discussed in this proposal or 

on other relevant matters. These 

comments will be considered before 

EPA takes final action. Interested parties 

may participate in the Federal 

rulemaking procedure by submitting 

written comments to the EPA New 

England Regional Office listed in the 

ADDRESSES section of this Federal 

Register, or by submitting comments 

electronically, by mail, or through hand 

delivery/courier following the 

directions in the ADDRESSES section of 

this Federal Register. 

VI. Incorporation by Reference 

In this rulemaking, the EPA is 

proposing to include in a final EPA rule 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is proposing to 

incorporate by reference into the New 

Hampshire SIP the statutes identified 

within Table 1 of this proposal. The 

EPA has made, and will continue to 

make, these documents generally 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the appropriate EPA office (see 

the ADDRESSES section of this preamble 

for more information). 

VII. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this 

proposed action merely approves state 

law as meeting Federal requirements 

and does not impose additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

state law. For that reason, this proposed 

action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Sulfur Oxides, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: July 1, 2015. 

H. Curtis Spalding, 

Regional Administrator, EPA New England. 

[FR Doc. 2015–17475 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0404; FRL–9930–61– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Maryland; Adoption of Control 

Techniques Guidelines for Metal 

Furniture Coatings and Miscellaneous 

Metal Parts Coatings 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a 

State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

revision submitted by the State of 

Maryland (Maryland). This revision 

includes amendments to Maryland’s 

regulation for the control of volatile 

organic compounds (VOC) and meets 

the requirement to adopt reasonably 

available control technology (RACT) for 

sources covered by EPA’s Control 

Techniques Guidelines (CTG) standards 

for coatings for metal furniture and 

miscellaneous metal parts. These 

amendments will reduce emissions of 

VOC from these source categories and 

help Maryland attain and maintain the 

national ambient air quality standard 

(NAAQS) for ozone. This action is being 

taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before August 17, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 

R03–OAR–2015–0404 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov. 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0404, 

Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, 

Office of Air Program Planning, 

Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

42460 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

1Heavier vehicles includes all vehicles that meet 

the definition of the term ‘‘other motor vehicles,’’ 

as defined in the National Emission Standards for 

Surface Coating of Automobile and Light-Duty 

Trucks at 40 CFR 63.3176. 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2015– 

0404. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI, or otherwise 

protected, through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy during normal business 

hours at the Air Protection Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Maryland Department of 

the Environment, 1800 Washington 

Boulevard, Suite 705, Baltimore, 

Maryland 21230. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Ellen Schmitt, (215) 814–5787, or by 

email at schmitt.ellen@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 

28, 2014, the State of Maryland through 

the Maryland Department of the 

Environment (MDE) submitted a 

revision to its SIP concerning the 

adoption of the coating standards 

located in the Metal Furniture Coatings 

and the Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic 

Parts Coatings CTGs. 

I. Background 

Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides 

that SIPs for nonattainment areas must 

include reasonably available control 

measures (RACM), including RACT for 

sources of emissions. Section 

182(b)(2)(A) provides that for certain 

nonattainment areas, states must revise 

their SIPs to include RACT for sources 

of VOC emissions covered by a CTG 

document issued after November 15, 

1990 and prior to the area’s date of 

attainment. 

In developing these CTGs, EPA, 

among other things, evaluates the 

sources of VOC emissions from these 

categories, and the available control 

approaches for addressing these 

categories, including the cost of such 

approaches. Based on available 

information and data, EPA provides 

recommendations for RACT for VOC 

from these categories. States can follow 

the CTGs and adopt state regulations to 

implement the recommendations 

contained therein, or they can adopt 

alternative approaches. In either case, 

states must submit their RACT rules to 

EPA for review and approval as part of 

the SIP process. EPA will evaluate the 

rules and determine, through notice and 

comment rulemaking in the SIP 

approval process, whether the 

submitted rules meet the RACT 

requirements of the CAA and EPA’s 

regulations. 

In September 2007, EPA published a 

new CTG for Metal Furniture Coatings 

(EPA–453/R–07–005), and in September 

2008, EPA published a new CTG for 

Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts 

Coatings (EPA–453/R–08–003). These 

CTGs discuss the nature of VOC 

emissions from these industries, the 

available control technologies for 

addressing such emissions, the cost of 

available control options, and other 

information. EPA developed new CTGs 

for these industries after reviewing 

existing state and local VOC emission 

reduction approaches, new source 

performance standards (NSPS), 

previously issued CTGs, and national 

emission standards for hazardous air 

pollutants (NESHAP) for these source 

categories. 

A. Metal Furniture Coatings 

Metal furniture coatings include the 

coatings that are applied to the surfaces 

of metal furniture. A metal furniture 

substrate is the furniture or components 

of furniture constructed either entirely 

or partially from metal. Metal furniture 

includes, but is not limited to, the 

following types of products: Household, 

office, institutional, laboratory, hospital, 

public building, restaurant, barber and 

beauty shop, and dental furniture, as 

well as components of these products. 

Metal furniture also includes office and 

store fixtures, partitions, shelving, 

lockers, lamps and lighting fixtures, and 

wastebaskets. Metal furniture coatings 

include paints and adhesives and are 

typically applied without a primer. 

Higher solids and powder coatings are 

used extensively in the metal furniture 

surface coating industry. Metal furniture 

coatings provide a covering, finish, or 

functional or protective layer, and can 

also provide a decorative finish to metal 

furniture. 

B. Miscellaneous Metal Parts Coatings 

Miscellaneous metal parts surface 

coating categories include the coatings 

that are applied to the surfaces of a 

varied range of metal parts and 

products. These parts or products are 

constructed either entirely or partially 

from metal. They include, but are not 

limited to, metal components of the 

following types of products as well as 

the products themselves: Fabricated 

metal products, small and large farm 

machinery, commercial and industrial 

machinery and equipment, automotive 

or transportation equipment, interior or 

exterior automotive parts, construction 

equipment, motor vehicle accessories, 

bicycles and sporting goods, toys, 

recreational vehicles, pleasure craft 

(recreational boats), extruded aluminum 

structural components, railroad cars, 

heavier vehicles,1 lawn and garden 

equipment, business machines, 

laboratory and medical equipment, 

electronic equipment, steel drums, 

metal pipes, and numerous other 

industrial and household products 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘miscellaneous metal parts.’’) The CTG 

applies to manufacturers of 

miscellaneous metal parts that surfacecoat the parts they produce. 

Miscellaneous metal parts coatings do 

not include coatings that are a part of 

other product categories listed under 

section 183(e) of the CAA for which 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules 42461 

2Maryland previously submitted, and EPA 

subsequently approved, a SIP revision to meet the 

requirements to adopt RACT for plastic part 

coatings covered by the CTG for Miscellaneous 

Metal and Plastic Parts Coatings. See 76 FR 64020 

(October 17, 2011). 

CTGs have been published or coatings 

addressed by other CTGs. 

II. Summary of SIP Revision 

On July 28, 2014, MDE submitted to 

EPA a SIP revision (#14–02) concerning 

the adoption of the emission limits for 

metal furniture coatings found in the 

Metal Furniture Coatings CTG and 

miscellaneous metal parts coatings 

found in the Miscellaneous Metal and 

Plastic Parts Coatings CTG.2 Maryland 

has adopted EPA’s CTG standards for 

metal furniture and miscellaneous metal 

parts coating processes by amending 

Regulation .08 under COMAR 26.11.19, 

Volatile Organic Compounds from 

Specific Sources. Specifically, this 

revision amends the existing regulation 

in section 26.11.19.08 by adding coating 

standards for both metal furniture and 

miscellaneous metal parts that are either 

equal to or more stringent than the 

coating standards found in EPA’s CTGs. 

Additionally, new definitions and 

application methods were added to 

COMAR section 26.11.19.08. Tables 1 

and 2 outline the emissions standards 

adopted by Maryland for metal furniture 

coatings and miscellaneous metal parts 

coatings. A detailed summary of EPA’s 

review of and rationale for proposing to 

approve this SIP revision may be found 

in the Technical Support Document 

(TSD) for this action which is available 

online at regulations.gov, Docket 

number EPA–R03–OAR–2015–0404. 

TABLE 1—METAL FURNITURE COATING VOC CONTENT LIMITS—VOC CONTENT LIMITS ARE EXPRESSED AS MASS (KILOGRAM (KG) OR POUND (LB)) PER VOLUME (LITER (L)) OF COATING LESS WATER AND EXEMPT COMPOUNDS, AS APPLIED

Coating 

Air-dried Baked 

kg VOC/l 

coating 

lb VOC/l 

coating 

kg VOC/l 

coating 

lb VOC/l 

coating 

Extreme high gloss .......................................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.360 3.0

Extreme performance ...................................................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 

General, multi-component ............................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.275 2.3 

General, one-component ................................................................................. 0.275 2.3 0.275 2.3 

Metallic ............................................................................................................. 0.420 3.5 0.420 3.5 

Pretreatment .................................................................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.420 3.5 

Solar absorbent ............................................................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 

TABLE 2—MISCELLANEOUS METAL PARTS COATING VOC CONTENT LIMITS—VOC CONTENT LIMITS ARE EXPRESSED AS

MASS (KILOGRAM (KG) OR POUND (LB)) PER VOLUME (LITER (L)) OF COATING LESS WATER AND EXEMPT COMPOUNDS, AS APPLIED

Coating 

Air-dried Baked 

kg VOC/l 

coating 

lb VOC/l 

coating 

kg VOC/l 

coating 

lb VOC/l 

coating 

Adhesion promoter .......................................................................................... 0.479 4.0 0.479 4.0 

Camouflage ...................................................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

Electric insulating varnish ................................................................................ 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

Etching filler ..................................................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

Extreme high-gloss .......................................................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0

Extreme performance ...................................................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 

General, multi-component ............................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.275 2.3 

General, one-component ................................................................................. 0.340 2.8 0.275 2.3 

Heat-resistant ................................................................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 

High performance architectural ....................................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 

High temperature ............................................................................................. 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

Military specification ......................................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.280 2.3 

Metallic ............................................................................................................. 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

Mold-seal ......................................................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

Pan backing ..................................................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

Prefabricated architectural multi-component ................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.280 2.3 

Prefabricated architectural one-component ..................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.280 2.3 

Pretreatment .................................................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

Repair coating .................................................................................................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 

Silicone release ............................................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

Solar absorbent ............................................................................................... 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 

Touch up coating ............................................................................................. 0.420 3.5 0.360 3.0 

Vacuum-metalizing .......................................................................................... 0.340 2.8 0.420 3.5 

III. Proposed Action 

EPA is proposing to approve the State 

of Maryland’s SIP revision submitted on 

July 28, 2014, adopting the requirements 

of EPA’s CTGs for the coating of metal 

furniture and miscellaneous metal parts, 

as RACT for these source categories. 

EPA is soliciting public comments on 

the issues discussed in this document. 

These comments will be considered 

before taking final action. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS

42462 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 137 / Friday, July 17, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

IV. Incorporation by Reference 

In this proposed rulemaking action, 

the EPA is proposing to include in a 

final EPA rule, regulatory text that 

includes incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, the EPA is proposing to 

incorporate by reference the MDE rules 

regarding control of VOC emissions 

from metal furniture and miscellaneous 

metal parts coatings as described as 

section II of this proposed action. The 

EPA has made, and will continue to 

make, these documents generally 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the appropriate EPA office (see 

the ADDRESSES section of this preamble 

for more information). 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Public Law 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed rule, 

pertaining to Maryland’s adoption of 

CTG recommendations for metal 

furniture and miscellaneous metal parts 

coatings does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000), because the SIP is not approved 

to apply in Indian country located in the 

state, and EPA notes that it will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Ozone, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: July 7, 2015. 

William C. Early, 

Acting, Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2015–17470 Filed 7–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 174 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2015–0032; FRL–9929–13] 

Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions 

Filed for Residues of Pesticide 

Chemicals in or on Various 

Commodities 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and 

request for comment. 

SUMMARY: This document announces the 

Agency’s receipt of several initial filings 

of pesticide petitions requesting the 

establishment or modification of 

regulations for residues of pesticide 

chemicals in or on various commodities. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before August 17, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by docket identification (ID) 

number and the pesticide petition 

number (PP) of interest as shown in the 

body of this document, by one of the 

following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. 

• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental 

Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ 

DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. 

NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. 

• Hand Delivery: To make special 

arrangements for hand delivery or 

delivery of boxed information, please 

follow the instructions at http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. 

Additional instructions on 

commenting or visiting the docket, 

along with more information about 

dockets generally, is available at 

http://www.epa.gov/dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susan Lewis, Director, Registration 

Division (RD) (7505P), main telephone 

number: (703) 305–7090; email address: 

RDFRNotices@epa.gov, Robert McNally, 

Director, Biopesticide and Pollution 

Prevention Division (BPPD), main 

telephone number: (703) 305–7090; 

email address: BPPDFRNotices@

epa.gov. The mailing address for each 

contact person is: Office of Pesticide 

Programs, Environmental Protection 

Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460–0001. As part of 

the mailing address, include the contact 

person’s name, division, and mail code. 

The division to contact is listed at the 

end of each pesticide petition summary. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. Does this Action apply to me? 

You may be potentially affected by 

this action if you are an agricultural 

producer, food manufacturer, or 

pesticide manufacturer. The following 

list of North American Industrial 

Classification System (NAICS) codes is 

not intended to be exhaustive, but rather 

provides a guide to help readers 

determine whether this document 

applies to them. Potentially affected 

entities may include: 

• Crop production (NAICS code 111). 

• Animal production (NAICS code 

112). 

• Food manufacturing (NAICS code 

311). 

• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 

code 32532). 

If you have any questions regarding 

the applicability of this action to a 

particular entity, consult the person 

listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT for the division listed at the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS