Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices 9357 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–565] 

In the Matter of Certain Ink Cartridges 

and Components Thereof; Notice of a 

Commission Determination Not to 

Review an Initial Determination 

Amending the Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation to Add a Respondent and 

Then Terminating the Respondent on 

the Basis of a Settlement Agreement, 

Consent Order Stipulation and 

Consent Order; Issuance of Consent 

Order 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) in the above-captioned 

investigation amending the complaint 

and notice of investigation to add a 

respondent and then terminating the 

investigation with respect to that 

respondent on the basis of a settlement 

agreement, consent order stipulation, 

and consent order. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael K. Haldenstein, Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3041. Copies of the public version 

of the ALJ’s ID and all other 

nonconfidential documents filed in 

connection with this investigation are or 

will be available for inspection during 

official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 

p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on 202–205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on March 23, 2006, based on a 

complaint filed by Epson Portland, Inc. 

of Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of 

California; and Seiko Epson Corporation 

of Japan. 71 FR 14720 (March 23, 2006). 

The complaint, as amended, alleged 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain ink cartridges and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement of claim 7 of U.S. Patent 

No. 5,615,957; claims 18, 81, 93, 149, 

164, and 165 of U.S. Patent No. 

5,622,439; claims 83 and 84 of U.S. 

Patent No. 5,158,377; claims 19 and 20 

of U.S. Patent No. 5,221,148; claims 29, 

31, 34, and 38 of U.S. Patent No. 

5,156,472; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 

5,488,401; claims 1–3 and 9 of U.S. 

Patent No. 6,502,917; claims 1, 31, and 

34 of U.S. Patent No. 6,550,902; claims 

1, 10, and 14 of U.S. Patent No. 

6,955,422; claim 1 of U.S. Patent No. 

7,008,053; and claims 21, 45, 53, and 54 

of U.S. Patent No. 7,011,397. The 

complaint further alleged that an 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337. The complainants requested that 

the Commission issue a general 

exclusion order and cease and desist 

orders. The Commission named as 

respondents 24 companies located in 

China, Germany, Hong Kong, Korea, and 

the United States. The ALJ set June 25, 

2007, as the target date for completion 

of the investigation. 

On January 9, 2007, complainants and 

proposed respondent Rhinotek 

Computer Products, Inc. (‘‘RCPI’’) filed 

a joint motion seeking to amend the 

complaint and notice of investigation to 

add RCPI as a respondent in the 

investigation and then to terminate the 

investigation with respect to RCPI based 

upon a settlement agreement, consent 

order stipulation, and proposed consent 

order. RCPI is the successor-in-interest 

to respondent Gerald Chamales 

Corporation (d/b/a/ Rhinotek Computer 

Products). The Commission 

investigative attorney supported the 

motion in a response dated January 26, 

2007. No other parties responded to the 

motion. 

On January 30, 2007, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 30) amending 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation to add RCPI to the 

investigation and then terminating the 

investigation with respect to RCPI on 

the basis of a settlement agreement, 

consent order stipulation, and proposed 

consent order. No petitions for review of 

the ID were filed and the Commission 

has determined not to review the ID. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, 

and Commission rules 210.14, 210.21 

and 210.42, 19 CFR 210.14, 210.21, 

210.42. 

Issued: February 22, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–3537 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–919 and 920 

(Review)] 

Welded Large Diameter Line Pipe From 

Japan and Mexico 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Scheduling of full five-year 

reviews concerning the antidumping 

duty orders on welded large diameter 

line pipe from Japan and Mexico. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of full reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) 

(the Act) to determine whether 

revocation of the antidumping duty 

orders on welded large diameter line 

pipe from Japan and Mexico would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. For further 

information concerning the conduct of 

these reviews and rules of general 

application, consult the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 

201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 

201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and 

F (19 CFR part 207). 

DATES: Effective Date: February 22, 

2007. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Dana Lofgren (202–205–3185), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server (http:// 

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

these reviews may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On February 5, 2007, 

the Commission determined that both 

the domestic interested party group 

response and the respondent group 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES