alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.15**

**ALLIANT ENERGY CORPORATION**

**INTERSTATE POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY**

**WISCONSIN POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY**

**Summary of Compensation and Benefits for**

**Non-Employee Directors**

**Effective January 1, 2008**

Effective January 1, 2008, the aggregate compensation for non-employee members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Alliant Energy Corporation, Interstate Power and Light Company and Wisconsin Power and Light Company will be as follows:

Non-employee members of the Board will be entitled to receive the following annual retainers as applicable:

|   | • | $125,000 for each non-employee director; |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------|

 

|   | • | $20,000 for the Lead Independent Director of the Board; |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | • | $13,500 for the Chairperson of the Audit Committee of the Board; |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | • | $3,500 for each member of the Audit Committee of the Board other than the Chairperson; and |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | • | $5,000 for the Chairperson of each of the Compensation and Personnel Committee, the Nominating and Governance Committee, and the Nuclear, Health and Safety Committee of the Board. |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Payments of all retainers shall be in cash and shall be pro-rated for retiring directors and for those directors whose terms shall expire at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, with the balance of any annual retainer amounts being paid following such director’s re-election at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

Each director may, and is encouraged to, voluntarily elect an amount of any of the cash compensation retainers to purchase common stock of Alliant Energy Corporation under the Shareowner Direct Plan or to have an amount be deferred in the Alliant Energy Deferred Compensation Plan Stock Account.

Alliant Energy Corporation maintains a Director’s Charitable Award Program for directors who were elected or appointed to the Board on or prior to January 1, 2005. Under the Program, when a director dies, Alliant Energy Corporation will donate a total of $500,000 to one qualified charitable organization or divide that amount among a maximum of five qualified charitable organizations selected by the individual director. All deductions for charitable contributions are taken by Alliant Energy Corporation, and the donations are funded by Alliant Energy Corporation through life insurance policies on the directors.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 1, 2014

t0924

Order 

Clerk

October 1, 2014

149177

NASIR ALI, MIR ASGHAR, and MID

MICHIGAN AMBULATORY PHYSICIAN,

PLC d/b/a ADVANCE URGENT CARE &

WALK-IN CLINIC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v SC: 149177

COA: 313939 

Ingham CC: 11-001326-CK

HORA S. LOLOEE,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 18, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
No. 57988.

protests 109713-K, etc. (Laredo).

#### F. G. Jackson et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It appearing that protests 109713-K and 109714-K were filed prior to liquidation, same were dismissed as premature. Protest 110658-K, having been filed more than 60 days after liquidation, was held untimely and was also dismissed. (Section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.)
No. 64117.

protest 59/12556 (Los Angeles).

#### Railway Express Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DUARTIE BLAMO DAVIES : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL : NO. 02-4459

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, it appearing that petitioner has filed

a petition for Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2241, and

it further appearing that petitioner did not tender the required $5.00 filing fee, and, 

it further appearing that petitioner has not requested leave to proceed in forma

pauperis using the complete form, and has only furnished his certification of prison assets

without any other information, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Clerk shall promptly furnish petitioner with the in forma

pauperis form, and petitioner shall either complete and return it to the Clerk of Court within

thirty (30) days, or in the alternative, tender the required $5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of Court

within thirty (30) days, or else this action will be dismissed.

 

STEWART DALZELL, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04459-SD Document 2 Filed 07/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
|  |  |
|--|--|
|  |
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-5067 September Term, 2017

 1:08-cv-01252-BJR

Filed On: March 9, 2018

Angela Clemente, 

 Appellant

v.

Federal Bureau of Investigation, et al., 

 Appellees

BEFORE: Garland, Chief Judge; Henderson, Rogers, Tatel, Griffith,

Kavanaugh*, Srinivasan, Millett, Pillard, Wilkins, and Katsas, Circuit

Judges; Edwards, Senior Circuit Judge

O R D E R

 Upon consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc and the response

thereto; appellant’s motion for leave to reply; and the absence of a request by any

member of the court for a vote on the petition, it is

ORDERED that the motion for leave be denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk

BY: /s/

Ken R. Meadows

Deputy Clerk

* A separate statement by Circuit Judge Kavanaugh, concurring in the denial of rehearing

en banc, is attached. 
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 16-5067 September Term, 2017

Kavanaugh, Circuit Judge, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc: 

As explained in my separate opinion in Morley v. CIA, 719 F.3d 689 (D.C. Cir.

2013), this Court’s four-factor test for awarding attorney’s fees in FOIA cases is

inconsistent with FOIA’s text and structure, and impermissibly favors some FOIA plaintiffs

over other equally deserving FOIA plaintiffs. In an appropriate case, I believe that the en

banc Court should re-examine and jettison that four-factor test. But for reasons explained

by the Government in its response to the petition for rehearing en banc, this case is not

an appropriate vehicle for such reconsideration.

Page 2
Exhibit No. 21

                          JOURNAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

        The following list shows the subsidiaries of the Registrant, their
   respective states of incorporation and the percentage of voting securities
   of each subsidiary owned by its immediate parent.  All companies listed
   have been included in the consolidated financial statements filed
   herewith.

                                                          Percent of Voting
                                                          Securities Owned
                                      State/Country       by Registrant or
        Subsidiary                    of Incorporation    Immediate Parent

   Journal Sentinel Inc.              Wisconsin           100% by Registrant
   Journal Broadcast Group, Inc.      Wisconsin           100% by Registrant
   NorthStar Print Group, Inc.        Wisconsin           100% by Registrant
   ADD, Inc.                          Wisconsin           100% by Registrant
   Norlight Telecommunications, Inc.  Wisconsin           100% by Registrant
   PrimeNet Marketing Services, Inc.  Minnesota           100% by Registrant
   Trumbull Printing, Inc.            Connecticut         100% by Registrant
   IPC Communication Services, Inc.   Michigan            100% by Registrant
   Hometown Publications, Inc.        Connecticut         100% by ADD, Inc.
   Label Products & Design, Inc.      Wisconsin           100% by NorthStar
                                                           Print Group
   PPC Liquidations, Inc.             Wisconsin           100% by NorthStar
                                                           Print Group
   Mega Direct, Inc.                  Wisconsin           100% by ADD, Inc.
   Auto Mart Publications, Inc.       Ohio                100% by ADD, Inc.
   Nordoc Software Services, S. A.    France               99% by Imperial
                                                            Printing*
   _____________________________
   *    1% by other subsidiaries of the Registrant

        The Registrant has no controlling parent.  Twelve million nine
   hundred and sixty thousand (12,960,000) shares, or ninety percent (90%),
   of the Registrant's issued common stock at December 31, 1996, are owned of
   record by the Trust.  The right to vote these shares in most instances
   resides in the employees who hold units of beneficial interest in that
   trust.  Accordingly, the Registrant is not controlled by the Trust and
   does not consider it to be a "parent" of the Registrant within the meaning
   of Regulation 12b-2.  See Item 12 "Security Ownership of Certain
   Beneficial Owners and Management."
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-K  of  American  Express
Certificate Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  Paula R. Meyer, as Chief Executive  Officer of the Company and Brian
J. McGrane, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d)
               of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all
               material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
               operations of the Company.



   /s/ Paula R. Meyer
   --------------------
Name:  Paula R. Meyer
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 14, 2005



    /s/ Brian J. McGrane
    -------------------------
Name:   Brian J. McGrane
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Date:   March 14, 2005


The foregoing  certification  is being  furnished  solely  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
and is not being  "filed" as part of the Form 10-K or as a  separate  disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended  (the  "Exchange  Act"),  or otherwise  subject to liability  under that
section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the  Securities  Act of 1933, as amended,  or the Exchange
Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is  expressly  and  specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TOMMY ROY KEETON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0697 GEB JFM P

vs.

SERGEANT CAROLL, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00697-ALA Document 60 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s April 13, 2006 motion

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: April 25, 2006.

/mp:001

keet0697.31

Case 2:04-cv-00697-ALA Document 60 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4252 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to establish additional payments 

for unborn livestock under the livestock indemnity payment program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 2, 2024 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to establish additional payments for unborn livestock under the livestock 

indemnity payment program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Livestock Indemnity 

5 Program Enhancement Act of 2024’’ or the ‘‘LIP En6 hancement Act of 2024’’. 

7 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR UNBORN LIVESTOCK. 

8 Section 1501(b) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 

9 U.S.C. 9081(b)) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4252 IS

1 ‘‘(5) ADDITIONAL PAYMENT FOR UNBORN LIVE2 STOCK.— 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—In the case of unborn 

4 livestock death losses incurred on or after Janu5 ary 1, 2024, the Secretary shall make an addi6 tional payment to eligible producers on farms 

7 that have incurred such losses in excess of the 

8 normal mortality due to a condition specified in 

9 paragraph (1). 

10 ‘‘(B) PAYMENT RATE.—Additional pay11 ments under subparagraph (A) shall be made at 

12 a rate— 

13 ‘‘(i) determined by the Secretary; and 

14 ‘‘(ii) less than or equal to 85 percent 

15 of the payment rate established with re16 spect to the lowest weight class of the live17 stock, as determined by the Secretary, act18 ing through the Administrator of the Farm 

19 Service Agency. 

20 ‘‘(C) PAYMENT AMOUNT.—The amount of 

21 a payment to an eligible producer that has in22 curred unborn livestock death losses shall be 

23 equal to the payment rate determined under 

24 subparagraph (B) multiplied, in the case of live25 stock described in— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4252 IS

1 ‘‘(i) subparagraph (A), (B), or (F) of 

2 subsection (a)(4), by 1; 

3 ‘‘(ii) subparagraph (D) of such sub4 section, by 2; 

5 ‘‘(iii) subparagraph (E) of such sub6 section, by 12; and 

7 ‘‘(iv) subparagraph (G) of such sub8 section, by the average number of birthed 

9 animals (for one gestation cycle) for the 

10 species of each such livestock, as deter11 mined by the Secretary. 

12 ‘‘(D) UNBORN LIVESTOCK DEATH LOSSES

13 DEFINED.—In this paragraph, the term ‘unborn 

14 livestock death losses’ means losses of any live15 stock described in subparagraph (A), (B), (D), 

16 (E), (F), or (G) of subsection (a)(4) that was 

17 gestating on the date of the death of the live18 stock.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8719]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3344]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL06-80-003]


Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.; Notice of 
Filing

February 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 9, 2007, Midwest Independent 
Transmission System Operator, Inc. filed a refund report in compliance 
to the Commission's August 11, 2006 Order on Complaint.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. 
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8acccfd8c9c5e4e6e3e4efd9fffafae5f8fecaeceff8e9a4ede5fc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="65232037262a0b090c0b00361015150a171125030017064b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 2, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3344 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 50014.

#### Protests 972470-G, etc., of Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the-beads in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), certain of the-items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent under the same paragraph as modified by T. D. 49458. The protests were sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financials contained in the body of the accompanying Form 10-Q and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              89
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,103
<ALLOWANCES>                                       179
<INVENTORY>                                      5,766
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,453
<PP&E>                                          11,983
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,767
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  26,227
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,217
<BONDS>                                          3,325
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,942
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    26,227
<SALES>                                          5,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,232
<CGS>                                            3,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   587
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 587
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,105)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (653)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,452)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,452)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 11.1 IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 11(a)  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE Year Ended December 31,
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Average number of shares outstanding
    
    
    28,274
    
    
    
    27,915
    
    
    
    26,829Net income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
    
    $
    69,904
    
    
    $
    72,817
    
    
    $
    52,833Basic
earnings per share before cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle
    
    $
    2.47
    
    
    $
    2.61
    
    
    $
    1.97Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    495Net income
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    53,328Basic earnings per share
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    1.99Diluted shares outstandingAverage number of shares outstanding
    
    
    28,274
    
    
    
    27,915
    
    
    
    26,829Assumed conversion of preferred shares (Note 1)
    
    
    2,607
    
    
    
    2,610
    
    
    
    2,610Assumed conversion of convertible trust
preferred shares (Note 1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    72Assumed exercise of stock options (Note 2)
    
    
    397
    
    
    
    325
    
    
    
    164Total shares
    
    
    31,278
    
    
    
    30,850
    
    
    
    29,675Net income
    
    $
    69,904
    
    
    $
    72,817
    
    
    $
    52,833Add back interest on convertible shares (Note 1)
    
    
    2,712
    
    
    
    2,715
    
    
    
    2,801Net income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
    
    $
    72,616
    
    
    $
    75,532
    
    
    $
    55,634Diluted
earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
    
    $
    2.32
    
    
    $
    2.45
    
    
    $
    1.87Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    495Net income
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    56,129Diluted earnings per share
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    1.89
   (1)
    
    The dilutive effect of convertible shares is based on the if converted method.(2)
    
    The dilutive effect of stock options is based on the Treasury Stock method.