alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2004 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
5-19-2004 

# S kr et vedt v . EI DuP on t de N e mours P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 03-2805

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2004 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du
. Re c omme nde d C it at ion

" S kr e t ve dt v

. EI DuP on t de N e mour s " (2004). 2004 D e cisio n s . P ape r 689. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004/689

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT O F APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ORRIN T. SKRETVEDT , )

Appellant, ) ) No. 03-2805 v. ) ) E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS ANDCOMPANY, ) a Del aware Corp orat

ion; P ENSION R

ET. ) PLAN; HO SPITAL A

ND MEDIC AL-SURGICAL ) PLAN; DE

NTAL ASSI STANCE PLA N; NON- ) CONTRIB UTORY GROU P LIFE I NSURANCE P LAN; ) TOTAL AND PERMANENT DISABILITY INCOME ) PLAN; SAVINGS PLAN; TAX REFORM ACT STOCK ) OWNERSH IP PLAN; SHORT TERM DISABILITY PLA

N )

_ __________ On Appeal from the United States Distri ct Court

for the District of Delaware Civil Act ion No. 98-cv- 00061 Magistr ate Judge : Honorable

Mary P. Thy nge Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

April 20, 2004 Before: SC IRICA, Chief Judge , GARTH and BRIG HT*, Circuit Judges

(Filed: April 23, 2004)

ORDER AMENDING OPI NION The above ent

itled Opi nion be and the

same is here by a mended i n the followi

ng respect: WHEREAS on page 2 and pa ge 4 of the ty

pescri pt Not Prec edentia

l Opinion the

### term

$226,000 appears, ther

e shall be substi tuted for t hat ter m the t erm $309, 217.

/s/ Leonard I. Garth, Circuit Judge Dated: Ma

y 19, 2004 CLW/cc: John M. Stull, Esq Ray

mond M. Rippl e, Esq.

____________________________ *Hono rable Myron H. Brigh t, United States C ourt of A ppeals for th e Eighth C ircuit, sitti ng by de signati on.
EXHIBIT 21. SUBSIDIARIES OF INNOVEX, INC.

                                                State or other jurisdiction of
Name                                            Incorporation or Organization
----                                            -----------------------------

Innovex Precision Components, Inc.              Minnesota

Innovex Southwest, Inc.                         Delaware

ADFlex Cayman Ltd.                              Cayman Island

Innovex (Thailand) Ltd.                         Thailand

ADFlex Solutions Ltd.                           Delaware and United Kingdom

ADFlex Mexico S.A. de C.V.                      Mexico

ADFlex Solutions FSC Inc.                       Barbados

Iconovex Corporation                            Minnesota

Innovex Limited                                 Minnesota

Mar Engineering, Inc.                           Minnesota

Innovex Sales Limited                           Jamaica


                                      E-42
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9502]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration


Cancellation of Minnesota's Delegation

AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Grain Standards Act, as amended (Act), 
provides for state agency delegations at export port locations within a 
state. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (Minnesota) is delegated 
to provide official export inspection and weighing services. Minnesota 
requested that they cease providing official services on April 2, 2007. 
Accordingly, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, 
USDA (GIPSA) is announcing that Minnesota's delegation will be 
cancelled effective April 2, 2007.

DATES: Effective April 2, 2007.

ADDRESSES: USDA, GIPSA, Karen Guagliardo, Chief, Review Branch, 
Compliance Division, STOP 3604, room 1647-S, 1400 Independence Ave., 
SW., Washington, DC 20250-3604.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karen Guagliardo at 202-720-8262, e-
mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c68da7b4a3a8e891e881b3a7a1aaafa7b4a2a986b3b5a2a7e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d49fb5a6b1bafa83fa93a1b5b3b8bdb5a6b0bb94a1a7b0b5fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action has been reviewed and determined 
not to be a rule or regulation as defined in Executive Order 12866 and 
Departmental Regulation 1512-1; therefore, the Executive Order and 
Departmental Regulation do not apply to this action.
    Section 7(e)(2) of the Act authorizes GIPSA' Administrator to 
delegate authority to a qualified State agency to perform all or 
specified functions involved in official inspection at export port 
locations within the state. Minnesota has been delegated authority to 
provide official export and weighing services since April 7, 1978. On 
January 2, 2007, Minnesota requested that they cease providing official 
services on April 2, 2007. Accordingly, Minnesota's delegation will be 
cancelled. For export services in Minnesota after April 2, 2007, 
contact David Mundwiler, Field Office Manager, Toledo, Ohio, telephone 
number 419-259-6276.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71 et seq.

Pat Donohue-Galvin,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards 
Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-3646 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Human Genome Project 

Completed in 2003, the Human Genome Project (HGP) was a 13-year project coordinated by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and the National Institutes of Health. During the early years of the HGP, the Wellcome Trust (U.K.) became a major partner; additional contributions came from Japan, France, Germany, China, and others.  This website details HGP history. 

## Explore the Project's History

## HGP Goals *+*

View more

## Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues *+*

View more

## Human Genome News *+*

View more

## Explore the Chromosomes

All chromosomes

View **

Chromosome 1

View **

Chromosome 2

View **

Chromosome 3

View **

Chromosome 4

View **

BER

GSP

JGI
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Petitioner is referred to the provisions of Local Rule 5-137 with respect to the

requirements for electronically lodging proposed orders, and petitioner is referred to the Court’s

web site to obtain the proper e:mail address to which a separate Word Perfect version of

proposed orders should be sent.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFRED R. DYER, SR.,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0484 DFL JFM P

vs.

T.L. ROSARIO,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has requested an extension of time to file and serve a supplemental brief

pursuant to the court’s order of March 25, 2005.1 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s May 4, 2005 request for an extension of time is granted; 

2. Petitioner shall file and serve a supplemental brief on or before June 9, 2005;

and

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00484-JAM -JFM Document 20 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3. Respondent’s response to petitioner’s supplemental brief, if any, shall be filed

and served not later than thirty days thereafter. 

DATED: May 26, 2005.

12/kf

dyer0484.111

Case 2:04-cv-00484-JAM -JFM Document 20 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 13,153.

#### SNYDER v. BRACHEN et al.

[5 Biss. 60.] 2

Circuit Court, D. Wisconsin.

Jan. Term. 1860.

Judgment — Release—Revivok.

A release of a judgment, which has been subsequently revived by scire facias, cannot be pleaded in an action brought on the revived judgment.

See, also, Cardesa v. Humes, 5 Serg. & R. 65; Share v. Becker, 8 Serg. & R. 239; Wilson v. Hurst [Case No. 17,809].

[This is a suit by John Snyder, executor of David Snyder, against John Brachen and Archibald Stett.]

MILLER, District Judge.

The summons was served on John Brachen. The suit is upon a record of a judgment rendered in the court of common pleas of Huntingdon county, Pennsylvania, by the plaintiff’s testator against these defendants and one William Simpson who has since died. The defendants pleaded nul tiel record, and a release in writing by plaintiff’s testator of Archibald Stett, dated September 24, 1850, of his liability, on the judgment for the consideration of $120, in which is an express stipulation that it shall not release or discharge Brachen and Simpson of their part of the debt. This was originally a partnership debt of the several defendants.

It appears from the record that the judgment was originally entered against the three defendants for $213, with interest, on the 11th of March, 1835. A fi. fa. was issued and personally served, property sold, and the proceeds of sale were applied to previous executions. The judgment was revived on the return of nihil' August 15, 1842. Alias scire facias to revive judgment was issued to the November term, 1857. Nihil returned. November 26, 1857, affidavit of defense filed, and defendants plead nul tiel record and payment, with leave to plead specially. July 16, 1858, a jury rendered a verdict for the plaintiffs of $478.51, and judgment was entered upon the verdict on the 21st of July, 1859.

Upon inspection of the transcript I am satisfied that there is such a record.

The plaintiff demurred to the plea of release. The release as set out was no doubt given to Stett. But there has been a revival of the judgment against the defendants by verdict, upon the plea of payment interposed, which would have entitled the release to be read in evidence, and a judgment since the date of the release.

This court is to give to judgments the same force and effect as given to them in the state where they were rendered. Now here is a judgment rendered by the court after the daté of the release pleaded. This is conclusive upon this court, and the demurrer to the plea must be sustained. It is a rule that after a judgment or revival, we cannot go behind that judgment to admit evidence affecting the judgment. Nor on a scire facias to revive a judgment can evidence be admitted affecting the merits of the original judgment, as that would have been a defense to the demand upon which the judgment was rendered. Demurrer sustained.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

TO: 

MOVES Modeling Files for Federal Register Document EPA-R04-0AR-2014-0904; 

Approval of Implementation Plans and Designation of Areas; Tennessee; Redesignation 

of the Tennessee Portion of the Chattanooga, 1997 PM2 s Nonattainment Area to 

Attainment 

Joydeb Majumder 1\J\ 

Air Regulatory Management Section 

File and Docket EPA-R04-0AR-2014-0904 

Due to the Moves modeling file type, the Region was unable to upload the MOVES files from 

Tennessee's submittal to the Federal Docket Management System. An electronic copy can be viewed at 

the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning & Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA request that, if at all possible, you schedule your inspection. Please 

contact Joydeb Majumder, listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section, of the Federal 

Register notice for an appointment. The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 to 4:30, excluding Federal holiday. 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for

the use and benefit of GELCO

SERVICES, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

EAI INTERNATIONAL, INC., et

al.,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

CIV. S-04-0814-DFL-PAN

ORDER

This matter was referred to the Honorable Peter A.

Nowinski, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§§ 636, et seq., and Local Rule 72-302. On September 30, 2005,

Judge Nowinski recommended judgment for plaintiff in the

principal amount of $185,179.35. No objections to the findings

and recommendation have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

Case 2:04-cv-00814-DFL-PAN Document 39 Filed 11/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed September

30, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. The clerk shall enter judgment in the amount

$185,179.35, plus prejudgment interest at the rate of 1.50

percent and postjudgment interest at the rate of 3.82 percent. 

If sought, counsel shall submit a request for attorneys fees and

costs within 30 days from service of this order.

DATED: 11/1/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00814-DFL-PAN Document 39 Filed 11/02/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. 2:04-cv-776-LKK-EFB P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

U.S.C. § 1983, has requested that the court issue a pretrial order. ECF No. 230. However,

defendants’ motion for summary judgment is currently pending. ECF Nos. 237, 248. Findings

and recommendations have issued, ECF No. 248, which are currently before the assigned district

judge for consideration. The court will issue a pretrial order in due course after the motion for

summary judgment has been resolved. Accordingly, plaintiff’s motion for a pretrial order (ECF

No. 230) is denied.

So ordered.

Dated: August 15, 2013.

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 250 Filed 08/15/13 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
                                                                    ------------

                               IIC INDUSTRIES INC.

                              List of Subsidiaries
                              --------------------

INVESTOR RT. (Hungary)
             Interag Rt. (Hungary)
                         Kompakt Auto Kft. (Hungary)
                         Interag Autohaz Kft. (Hungary)
                         Motor Pedo, Kft. (Hungary)
                         Frigoland Kft. (Hungary)
                         H.H.H. Udvarhaz Kft. (Hungary)

             Agrimill-Agrimpex Rt. (Hungary)
                         Agrimpex International Ltd. (UK)
                         Boma Kft. (Hungary)

ISRAEL TRACTORS AND EQUIPMENT CO. LTD. (Israel)
                  Ambache Engineering, Ltd. (Israel)

BALTON C.P. LIMITED (England)
            Amiran Zambia Ltd. (Zambia)
            Telkor Communications Systems, Ltd. (Zambia)
            Ghana Smartcomm Ltd. (Ghana)
            Bamari Limited (Kenya)
            Amiran Communications, Ltd. (Kenya)
            Dizengoff Ghana Ltd. (Ghana)
            Amiran Kenya Ltd. (Kenya)
            Balton Tanzania Ltd. (Tanzania)
            Balton BV-DWA (Nigeria) Ltd. (Nigeria)
            Balton (U) Ltd. Uganda (Uganda)
            Dizengoff (WA) Nigeria Limited (Nigeria)
            Balton SNES S.A. (Ivory Coast)
Hydration products include:

3CaO•3Al 2 O 3 •CaSO 4 •12H 2 O,

3CaO•3Al 2 O 3 •3CaSO 4 •32H 2 O (ettringite),

and Al(OH) 3
No. 51392.

#### Protests 951303-G, etc., of Bohemian Distributing Co. et al. (Los Angeles and San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Appendix I List of Acronyms and AbbreviationsLIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

I - 1 AB Assembly Bill ARB Air Resources Board ATCM Airborne Toxic Control Measure
BACT Best available control technology Board Air Resources Board Bhp Brake horsepower which is equivalent to horsepower
CAA Federal Clean Air Act CAPCOA California Air Pollution Control Officers Association CARB California Air Resource Board CCR California Code of Regulations CEQA California Environmental Quality Act Certified engine An engine certified to ARB/federal newly manufactured off-road engine emission standards CO Carbon Monoxide CO2 Carbon Dioxide CI Confidence Interval

Diesel PM Diesel Particulate Matter District Air pollution control or air quality management district Diesel Risk Reduction Plan Risk Reduction Plan to Reduce Particulate Matter Emissions from Diesel-Fueled Engines and Vehicles DOC Diesel Oxidation Catalyst DOF Department of Finance DPF Diesel particulate filter DTSC Department of Toxic Substance Control
EO Executive Officer of the Air Resources Board
FSOR Final Statement of Reasons FTF Flow-through filter g/ bhp-hr Grams per brake horsepower-hour GSE Ground Support Equipment
HC Hydrocarbon hp Horsepower which is equivalent to brake horsepower H&SC California Health and Safety Code
ISOR Initial Statement of Reasons
μg/m3 Microgram per cubic meter MOU Memorandum of UnderstandingI -2

NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standard NO Nitrogen oxide NO2 Nitrogen dioxide NOx Oxides of nitrogen
OCS Outer Continental Shelf OEHHA Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment Off-Road Model Off-Road Emissions Model

PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PERP ARB’s Statewide Portable Equipment Registration Program PM Particulate matter PM 10 Particulate matter 10 microns or less in diameter PM2.5 Particulate matter less then 2.5 microns in diameter ppm Parts per million Proposed ATCM Proposed air toxic control measure for diesel-fueled portable engines
ROE Return on Owner's Equity ROG Reactive Organic Gases
SCR Selective Catalytic Reduction SIC Standard Industrial Classification SRP Scientific Review Panel SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SOF Soluble Organic Fraction SO2 Sulfur Dioxide
TAC Toxic air contaminant Tier 1-3 engine Engines certified to California/federal newly manufactured Tier 1, 2 or 3 off-road engine emission standards Tier 4 engine Engines certified to United States Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed Tier 4 off-road engine emission standards tpd Tons per day TSE Tactical Support Equipment

UL Underwriters Lab Uncertified engine Engines that are not certified to a California/federal newly manufactured off-road engine emission standard U. S. EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1587 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1587

                       For the relief of Liu Xia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2017

   Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. Tillis) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                       For the relief of Liu Xia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR LIU XIA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Liu Xia 
shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment 
of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence 
upon filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under 
section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) or for adjustment of status to 
lawful permanent resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Liu Xia enters the United States 
before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), Liu Xia shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully in the United 
States and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 
of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
    (c) Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall 
apply only if the application for the issuance of an immigrant visa or 
the application for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 
not later than the later of--
            (1) 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act; or
            (2) 2 years after the date on which Liu Xia is released 
        from incarceration or travel restriction imposed by the 
        People's Republic of China.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Numbers.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Liu Xia, the Secretary of 
State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the 
current or next following fiscal year--
            (1) the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
        available to natives of the country of birth of Liu Xia under 
        section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
        1153(a)); or
            (2) if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that 
        are made available to natives of the country of birth of Liu 
        Xia under section 202(e) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)).
                                 <all>
```
----

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of the Council Directive 90/385/EEC of 20 June 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to active implantable medical devices

(2006/C 277/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the directive)

NOTE:

More information about harmonised standards on the Internet at:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(1)  ESO: European Standardisation Organisation:

(2)OJ L 204, 21.7.1998, p. 37.

(3)OJ L 217, 5.8.1998, p. 18.

----