Jump to Navigation

# FLRA.gov

RSS FEEDS

## Search form

Menu

eFilingAvailable Here

            -  **Home 
            -              About            -              Introduction to the FLRA           
-              Mission           
-              Budget & Performance           
-              Organizational Chart           
-              FLRA Leadership           
-              Press Releases           
-              Public Affairs           
-              FLRA Job Postings           
Our Mission
Protecting rights and facilitating stable relationships among federal agencies, labor organizations, and employees while advancing an effective and efficient government through the administration of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.  
Feedback about www.FLRA.gov
Let us know what you think about our new and improved website by emailing us at EngagetheFLRA@flra.gov.
 
            -              Components & Offices            -              Components            -              The Authority           
-              Office of the General Counsel           
-              The Federal Service Impasses Panel           
 
-              Offices            -              Office of Administrative Law Judges           
-              Collaboration and Alternative Dispute Resolution Office (CADRO)           
-              Office of Case Intake and Publication           
-              Office of the Executive Director           
-              Office of Inspector General           
-              Office of the Solicitor           
 
Is the FLRA hiring?
Find a listing of all of the FLRA's current job openings.    
Contact Us
Find a listing of FLRA contacts that you can call for more information.  
 
            -              Case Types            -              File a Case           
-              Unfair Labor Practice           
-              Representation           
-              Arbitration           
-              Negotiability           
-              Negotiation Impasse           
-              Other Types           
Ready to file a case?
Find everything you need to know about filing a case with the FLRA.    
  
            -              Decisions            -              Authority Decisions           
-              Administrative Law Judges Decisions           
-              Federal Service Impasses Panel Decisions           
-              Solicitor's Briefs and Court Decisions           
-              Archival Decisions, Legislative History, & Foreign Service Decisions           
-              Quarterly Digest of Authority Decisions           
Quarterly Digest of Authority Decisions
Case digests provide a brief synopsis of the most pertinent principles in merits decisions issued by the Authority. 
Archival Decisions
Find historical decisions of the Assistant Secretary of Labor for Labor-Management Relations and the Federal Labor Relations Council, as well as Foreign Service Labor Relations Board decisions.  
Legislative History 
View the legislative history of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, the Civil Service Reform Act, and the Foreign Service Act.
 
            -              Resources & Training            -              Resources            -              Quarterly Digest of Authority Decisions           
-              The Statute & Regulations           
-              Information by Case Type           
-              Policy Statements           
-              Guides & Manuals           
-              Forms & Checklists           
 
-              Training            -              Upcoming FLRA Training           
-              Training Contacts           
-              FLRA on YouTube           
-              Course Materials           
-              Video Training           
-              Customer Feedback           
 
FLRA Training on YouTube
Watch free online FLRA trainings on our Youtube channel and don’t forget to subscribe to receive updates on new videos.
  

## You are here

          - Home
          - [Decision Number]

# National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Inc. 

**71 FLRA No. 102                                                                                                             **

NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION, INC. 

 

0-PS-41

 

_____

 

DECISION ON

REQUEST FOR GENERAL STATEMENT

OF POLICY OR GUIDANCE

 

January 24, 2020

 

 

_____

 

Before the Authority:  Colleen Duffy Kiko, Chairman,and Ernest DuBester and James T. Abbott, Members

(Member DuBester concurring)

 
                      - Statement of the Case     The National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation (the Foundation) requests, pursuant to § 2427.2 of the Authority’s Regulations,[1] a general statement of policy or guidance on the interpretation of § 7131(b) of the Federal Service Labor‐Management Relations Statute (the Statute).[2]      Section 7131(b) states that “[a]ny activities performed by any employee relating to the internal business of a labor organization (including the solicitation of membership, elections of labor organization officials, and collection of dues) shall be performed during the time the employee is in a non‐duty status.”[3]  In *AFGE, AFL‐CIO, Local 2823*(*Local 2823*), the Authority interpreted § 7131(b) of the Statute as prohibiting official time for any activity that is “*solely* related to the institutional structure of a labor organization.”[4]      In its request, the Foundation asks the Authority to issue a general statement of policy or guidance overturning *Local 2823*and finding that § 7131(b) “prohibits [the] use of official time not only for activities that solely relate to the institutional structure of a labor organization, but for any activities that relate to the internal business of a labor organization, even if the activity also relates to other union business.”[5]  The Foundation asserts that the Authority’s interpretation of § 7131(b) in *Local 2823* “defies the [S]tatute’s plain language,”[6] which bars official time for activities “*relating* to the internal business” of a union.[7]    
                      - Decision     In deciding whether to issue a general statement of policy or guidance, the Authority considers the standards in § 2427.5 of the Authority’s Regulations.[8]  We find the Foundation’s request to be dependent upon the circumstances of the case at issue, so much so, that this issue of law and policy can be developed more fully in the context of an actual dispute.[9]  As the Authority has stated, internal union‐business activities “must be considered based on the particular facts and circumstances of each case.”[10]  Thus, the question is more appropriately addressed in a case or controversy – such as an arbitration, unfair‐labor‐practice, or negotiability dispute[11] – or, alternatively, through the rule‐making process.  Therefore, we deny the Foundation’s request for a general statement of policy or guidance.[12]     We note that Executive Order 13,837 has returned official time to the federal labor community’s attention.[13]  Among other things, that Order:  emphasizes that agencies should “give special attention to ensuring” that official time is not used for “internal union business in violation of [§] 7131(b);”[14] directs employees to obtain “advance written authorization from their agency” before using official time;[15] and states that the total amount of official time bargained under § 7131(d) of the Statute should ordinarily not exceed one hour per bargaining‐unit employee each fiscal year.[16]  The effect and application of the Executive Order is most appropriately addressed through a case or controversy – not a general statement of policy or guidance.[17]                                         **Member DuBester, concurring:**                  I agree that the request does not satisfy the standards governing the issuance of general statements of policy or guidance.  Because the questions posed by the request can more appropriately be addressed in the context of facts and circumstances presented by parties in an actual dispute, I concur in the Decision to deny the request.          

----

[1] 5 C.F.R. § 2427.2.

[2] 5 U.S.C. § 7131(b).

[3]*Id.*

[4] 2 FLRA 3, 9 (1979) (emphasis added); *see also NTEU*, 45 FLRA 339, 361‐62 (1992) (finding provision negotiable because it did “not solely relate to the structure and institution of the [u]nion”); *NTEU*, 38 FLRA 1366, 1368 (1991) (finding proposal negotiable because it did “not solely relate to the structure and institution of the [u]nion”);*AFGE, AFL‐CIO, Local 1692*, 3 FLRA 304, 308 (1980) (“The disputed proposal in the instant case clearly does not relate solely to the structure and institution of the labor organization.”).

[5] Request at 1.

[6]*Id.*

[7] 5 U.S.C. § 7131(b) (emphasis added).

[8] 5 C.F.R. § 2427.5.

[9]*Id.*§ 2427.5(a).

[10]*Dep’t of HHS, SSA*, 46 FLRA 1118, 1123 (1993); *see also USDA, Farm Serv. Agency, St. Louis, Mo.*, 66 FLRA 450, 451 (2012) (*USDA*).

[11]*See USDA*, 66 FLRA at 450-51 (arbitration); *AFGE, Local 987*, 37 FLRA 119 (1990) (unfair‐labor‐practice); *IAMAW, Lodge 2424*, 5 FLRA 438 (1981) (negotiability).

[12]*See Order Denying Request for Gen. Ruling*, 51 FLRA 409, 412 (1995) (“[I]ssues of law and policy generally may be developed more fully in the context of the facts and circumstances presented by parties within the context of a dispute between them.”).

[13] Member Abbott clarifies that he supports the Policy Statement’s reference to Executive Order 13,837 (E.O.) as addressing, at least in part, the question posed by the Foundation.  He also agrees that questions of this nature most naturally will be addressed as specific circumstances arise.  However, Member Abbott notes that the E.O. excludes the adverb “solely” when describing the limitation on activities that must be excluded from official time.  This exclusion is hardly accidental.  Thus, existing Authority precedent cited by the Foundation runs counter to the plain language of the E.O. and, as noted before, is “supported by nothing more than the Authority’s own repetition of it.”  *U.S. DHS, U.S. CBP,*

*El Paso, Tex.*, 70 FLRA 501, 503 (2018) (Member DuBester dissenting).  The axiomatic fact that disputes concerning this E.O. will be resolved by the Authority does not mean that we should not bring clarity where we can today.

[14]*Ensuring Transparency, Accountability, and Efficiency in Taxpayer-Funded Union Time Use*, 83 Fed. Reg. 25,335, 25,338 (May 25, 2018).

[15]*Id.*at 25,337.

[16]*Id.*at 25,336.

[17]*See AFGE, AFL-CIO v. Trump*, 929 F.3d 748, 754 (D.C. Cir. 2019) (stating that “the [u]nions must pursue their claims

[that Executive Orders 13,836, 13,837, and 13,839 are inconsistent with the Statute] through the scheme established by the Statute, which provides for administrative review by the FLRA followed by judicial review in the courts of appeals.”).

### Federal Labor Relations Authority

1400 K Street, NWWashington, DC 20424 771-444-5801

### Footer Menu Col1

              - Home
              - About Us
              - Components & Offices
              - Contact Us

### Footer Menu Col2

              - Case Types
              - Decisions
              - Resources & Training

### Promo Menu Block

eFilingAvailable Here

### Footer Secondary Menu

              - FOIA
              - Inspector General
              - No FEAR Act & EEO
              - Whistleblower Protection
              - Vulnerability Disclosure
              - OpenGov
              - 508 Compliance
              - Privacy Policy