alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. (IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         219,929
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     62,014
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               296,449
<PP&E>                                          42,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,882)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 513,690
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           94,922
<BONDS>                                        150,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     261,100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   513,690
<SALES>                                        128,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,032
<CGS>                                          103,676
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  103,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               169,226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (141,213)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (1)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (141,214)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (141,214)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.39)


</TABLE>
13249-33556 AHN 501096.1 - 1 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FO- R DISMISSAL OF CALTRANS

LOMBARDI, LOPER

& CONANT, LLP

Lake Merritt Plaza 

1999 Harrison Street 

Suite 2600 

Oakland, CA 94612-3541

TEL: 510/433-2600 

FAX: 510/433-2699 

B. CLYDE HUTCHINSON, 037526 

AN H. NGUYEN, 215453 

LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 

Lake Merritt Plaza 

1999 Harrison Street, Suite 2600 

Oakland, CA 94612-3541 

TEL: (510) 433-2600 

FAX: (510) 433-2699 

Attorneys for Defendants 

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, 

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AND 

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION/CALTRANS 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT— 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA—SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

JOSHUA WARD, FONDA WARD, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION/CALTRANS; 

CALIFORNIA AMTRAK; STATE OF 

CALIFORNIA; JACOB KEATING; COUNTY 

OF SACRAMENTO; COUNTY OF YOLO; 

CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO; UNION 

PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a business 

organization of unknown status; and DOES 1 

through 50, inclusive, 

Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CIV. S-04-678 FCD PAN 

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 

DISMISSAL OF CALIFORNIA 

DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION/CAL TRANS 

WITH PREJUDICE, EACH PARTY TO 

BEAR THEIR OWN COSTS 

Case 2:04-cv-00678-FCD-PAN Document 52 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 2
13249-33556 AHN 501096.1 - 2 - 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FO- R DISMISSAL OF CALTRANS

LOMBARDI, LOPER

& CONANT, LLP

Lake Merritt Plaza 

1999 Harrison Street 

Suite 2600 

Oakland, CA 94612-3541

TEL: 510/433-2600 

FAX: 510/433-2699 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Joshua Ward and Fonda Ward 

and Defendants California Department of Transportation/CalTrans and Union Pacific Railroad 

Company, through their designated counsel, that: 

1. For the purposes of this litigation only, Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company 

owns and maintains the lower level of the I-Street Bridge where Plaintiff Joshua Ward sustained 

injuries, which are the subject of the present lawsuit, on or about March 8, 2003. 

2. The above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice as to 

Defendant California Department of Transportation/CalTrans pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 

Procedure 41(a)(1). Each party agrees to bear their own costs. 

 

DATED: May 23, 2005 

LOMBARDI, LOPER & CONANT, LLP 

By: /s/ An H. Nguyen 

AN H. NGUYEN 

Attorney For Defendants CalTrans/Amtrak/Union Pacific 

DATED: May 25, 2005 

LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT A. PIERING, ESQ. 

By: /s/ Robert A. Piering 

ROBERT A. PIERING 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

 ORDER

It is so ordered. 

DATED: May 26, 2005 

 

By: /s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

 FRANK C. DAMRELL JR. 

 US DISTRICT JUDGE 

Case 2:04-cv-00678-FCD-PAN Document 52 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 2
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2015 SECTION IV

DRAFT T/L S2 15-01	IV AT - &P	IRC Handout 5-7-15
Employment Agreement with Antoine Jarjour





Exhibit 10.2

 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

Agreement made between The GNS Group, Inc., located at 4017 Colby Avenue, Everett, WA, herein referred to as “Company”.

And

Antoine Jarjour, herein referred to as “Employee”.

Company hereby employs employee to perform such duties at such times and in such manner as the company may from time to time direct.

Employee agrees that he will perform those duties assigned to him to the best of his ability, to maintain a current and complete account of his work and expenses, to remit promptly to the company any monies paid to him or coming into his possession which belong to the company.

In consideration of the foregoing, company agrees to pay to employee the amount of $4,500 per month plus reasonable travel expenses incurred for the purpose of conducting company business.

This contract shall become effective on March 1, 2007 and remain in effect until it is terminated by either party. Either party may terminate this agreement by providing the other party with 30 days written notice of his or their intention. Should this agreement be terminated by either party, employee agrees that the payment in full to the date of termination shall fully satisfy all claims against the company under this agreement.


	Agreed:  	Agreed:  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	ANTOINE JARJOUR  	ANTOINE JARJOUR  
	By: President  	Employee  
	The GNS Group, Inc.
(Reap. Dec. 8643)

Entry No. 282.

#### Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc., a/c Askania-Werke *v.*United States

(Decided September 14, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*'Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by and between the respective parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the tools enumerated below, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, as follows:

> *5021 High Voltage Test Device Nr. 561616_ DM 47. 50

> 1 Countersink reamer M3 x 3,2- DM 5.

> 1 Countersink reamer M8 x 8,4- DM 8. 50

> 1 Synchronous Motor 220 V, 60 c/s 60:1_ DM 25. 95

> DM 86. 95

> f. o. b. Hamburg

> All items packed.

> IT IS' FURTHER AGREED AND STIPULATED that there was no higher foreign value, as defined in Sec. 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for merchandise such or similar to that involved herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> 1 high voltage test device Nr. 551616- DM 47. 50

> 1 countersink reamer M3 x 3,2_ “ 5. 00

> 1 “ “ M8 x 8,4_ “ 8. 50

> 1 synchronous motor 220 V, 60 c/s 60:1_ “ 25. 95

> DM 86. 95

> f. o. b. Hamburg

> All items packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**Parent Company Name Facility Location - City**  **Facility Location - State**

ACME Elgin TX

1 5/26/2011 1100 1 5/26/2011 1100 2 5/26/2011 1405 2 5/26/2011 1405 3 5/26/2011 1650 3 5/26/2011 1650 **Run Number Test Start Date**  **Test Start Time Source Tested ID** 

Brick Tunnel Kiln Outlet Stack (EPN 16)

5/26/2011 1200 Hydrogen Chloride

5/26/2011 1200 Hydrogen Fluoride 5/26/2011 1505 Hydrogen Chloride 5/26/2011 1505 Hydrogen Fluoride 5/26/2011 1750 Hydrogen Chloride 5/26/2011 1750 Hydrogen Fluoride

**Test End Time Pollutant Tested For**  **Test End Date Me**  **asured Value (ppm) Basis (Wet or Dry)**  **Test Method Used (ex. EPA Me**  **thod 320)** 17.39 Dry EPA Method 320 14.06 Dry EPA Method 320 14.48 Dry EPA Method 320 8.86 Dry EPA Method 320 22.04 Dry EPA Method 320 8.1 Dry EPA Method 320 **Emission Test Results Data Flag (A**  **DL, BDL, DLL) Test Method Comments**  **lb/hr**

ADL 1.41 ADL 0.63 ADL 1.15 ADL 0.39 ADL 1.85 ADL 0.37 **Calculated Emission Rate lb/ton Throughput**  9.65E-02 14.61 4.31E-02 14.61 7.87E-02 14.61 2.67E-02 14.61 1.27E-01 14.61 2.53E-02 14.61 **Calculated Emission Rate Throughput (tons/hr)**  **Throughput Material**11.78 4.2 13.7 11.78 4.2 13.7 15.58 4.3 13.4 15.58 4.3 13.4 12.33 4.6 13.1 12.33 4.6 13.1 **Flue Gas Moisture (%) Flue Gas O**  **2 (%)**  **Flue Gas CO 2** **(%)**24,644 14,308 333 24,644 14,308 333 25,271 14,032 333 25,271 14,032 333 25,695 14,032 333 25,695 14,032 333 **Flue Gas Glow Rate (acfm) Flue Gas Flow Rate (dscfm)**  **Flue Gas Temperature ( °**  **F) Other Supporting Information**
Before the Second Division,

April 19, 1961

No. 65476.

#### Ronco Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/29849, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal magnetos and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ronco Corporation*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 253, C.D. 2184), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

S.P.,

Respondent

v.

B.H.,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 70 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 12th day of June, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6387

JEFFREY L. MOORE, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-04-543-3) Submitted: June 23, 2005 Decided: June 30, 2005 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jeffrey L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Robert H. Anderson, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Jeffrey L. Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BLACKWATER SECURITY, |

CONSULTING, LLC, ET AL. |

Plaintiffs, |

| CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-CV-6020

v. |

|

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES |

INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. |

Defendants. |

ORDER

AND NOW, this _____ day of July, 2008, upon consideration of correspondence from

Plaintiffs and Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines, IT IS HEREBYORDERED and DECREED

that the status conference before the Honorable Petrese B. Tucker in room 9613 United States

Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19106, on Thursday, August 7, 2008 at 11:00 a.m.

has been re-scheduled for Tuesday, September 5, 2008 at 11:30 a.m. The Court shall delay

entering a decision on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment against Defendant

Westchester (Doc. 52) pending the status conference.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Petrese B. Tucker

_____________________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 91

Dockets.Justia.com
## Featured Stories

Supporting mental health
                        Suicide is a leading cause of death among working age adults. Find resources for workers and employers to support mental health and help prevent suicide.            

Opportunity infrastructure
                        Infrastructure isn't just roads and bridges - it's our workforce system too.            

Century of Service
                        Our Century of Service Honor Roll of American Labor Organizations honors labor unions that have reached their 100th anniversary and their contributions in American history.            

Child and forced labor
                        Two new reports document the current situation of child labor, forced labor and forced child labor around the world, as well as actions to end these abuses.            

## Quick Links

American Rescue Plan

Disaster Recovery Assistance

How Do I File for Unemployment Insurance?

Worker.gov

Employer.gov

MigrantWorker.gov

Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)

Grants

Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)

Workplace Posters

Minimum Wage

Guidance for Visitors to DOL National Office

Apprenticeship Finder

Worker rights and benefits depend on you exercising your fundamental right! Register to vote at Vote.gov

## Blog

**Older women's wealth: Still coming up short**

**Raising the bar and celebrating excellence during HBCU Week**

**Employment Supports Recovery: How Work Helps**

##  News 

September 26, 2024
Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims Report

September 25, 2024
US Department of Labor awards $6.5M in grants to support delivery of temporary, permanent housing services to farmworkers, dependents 

September 25, 2024
US Department of Labor, Albany State University launch partnership to support veterans, enhance employment opportunities at HBCUs 

September 25, 2024
Biden-Harris administration awards $71M in grants to improve job quality, prepare workers, expand access to good jobs in critical sectors

September 24, 2024
US Department of Labor announces framework to help employers promote inclusive hiring as AI-powered recruitment tools’ use grows

More News

FacebookXInstagramThreadsLinkedinYoutube
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MANUEL AYALA, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0903 RRB CMK P

vs.

ANDREASEN, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00903-JAM -CMK Document 20 Filed 06/23/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 12, 2006 motion

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: June 22, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/mp

ayal 04cv0903.31

Case 2:04-cv-00903-JAM -CMK Document 20 Filed 06/23/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 57684.

#### Lobsitz Mills Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 179363-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “T. D. 53159 Clean Content” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: October 16,
              2006
            By:
            */s/
              John B. Gallagher*Name:
                    John B. Gallagher
                  Title:
                    Co-Chief Executive
                    Officer




Date: October 16,
                2006
              By:
              */s/
                Harry D. Shields*Name:
                      Harry D. Shields
                    Title:
                      Co-Chief Executive
                      Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Part 2, Section VI: USSGL Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements**

This section includes crosswalks for use in Fiscal Year 2019 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map USSGL accounts to external reports in accordance with TFM Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 4700, Agency Reporting Requirements for the *Financial Report of the United States Government.*Each report crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or column on the reports.

Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This subsidiary information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional information on attributes.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by Fiscal Service:

Page 1 of 1

# image1.png
# 2108 2013 V31

# Footnotes
ZIP FILES NOT IN ELECTRONIC DOCKET FOR NEBRASKA RH PROPOSAL EPA-R07-OAR-2012-0158

February 28, 2012

The following files are a part of the docket for this rulemaking, but were in file formats which could not be 

uploaded into the electronic docket. If you would like copies of these files, please contact Chrissy 

Wolfersberger, EPA Region 7, at 913-551-7964 or Wolfersberger.chris@epa.gov. 

Chapter 8, Appendix 8.1: 2002 Emissions Inventory

Access Databases:

 AREA_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

 FIRE_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

 MOBILE_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

 OTHER_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

 POINT_2002_SMOKE_REPORTS[1].zip

 SMOKEREPORTS_2002.zip

Chapter 8, Appendix 8.2: 2018 Emissions Inventory

Access Databases:

 ALL_SECTORS_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

 AREA_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

 FIRE_2018_REPORTS.zip

 MOBILE_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

 OTHER_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

 POINT_2018_SMOKE_REPORTS.zip

Chapter 10, Appendix 10.5: Modeling Results

CALPOST files for Gerald Gentleman Station and Nebraska City Station:

 MODELING CD – GGS.zip

 MODELING CD – NCS.zip
exv10w21







 




    Exhibit 10.21



 



    BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 10.7 of
    the [Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation 1995 Director’s
    Stock Compensation Plan as amended and restated May 14,
    1998], the Board authorizes the Chief Executive Officer and the
    Executive Vice President — Human Resources to modify
    the terms of any outside director stock option outstanding as of
    December 31, 2005 that was not fully vested as of
    December 31, 2004 (including stock options issued in 2005),
    to remove the existing provisions regarding dividend equivalents
    and provide for the distribution, as soon as practical, of a
    dollar amount equal to the dividend equivalents accrued through
    the date of such distribution, and for future dividend
    equivalents, to distribute those amounts as soon as practical to
    the extent that they would otherwise have accrued.
No. 49629.

#### Protests 918780-G, etc., of American Straw Goods Co. (New York).

Opinion-by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain of the items in question consist of manila hemp hats similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which record was admitted in evidence herein. The claim at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) was therefore sustained as to this item.
# sec5_snc_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SNC - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2019