alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 21

                        FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE CORPORATION

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
SUBSIDIARY                                            JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------                                            -----------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>
Fleet National Bank                                   United States
  Fleet Bank (RI), National Association               United States
      Fleet Credit Card Holdings, Inc.                Delaware
        FBF Credit Card Holdings, Inc. (99%)          Rhode Island
  Fleet Mortgage Corp.                                South Carolina
  Fleet Holding Corp.                                 Rhode Island
    Fleet Capital Corporation                         Rhode Island
      Fleet Leasing Partners I, L.P.                  Rhode Island
        Fleet Business Credit Corporation             Delaware
  Fleet RI Holding Corp.                              Rhode Island
    Fleet Investment Advisors Inc.                    New York
  Boston World Holding Corporation                    Massachusetts
    Boston Overseas Financial Corporation S.A.        Argentina
Fleet Growth Resources, Inc.                          Rhode Island
Quick & Reilly/Fleet Securities, Inc.                 Delaware
Robertson Stephens Group, Inc.                        Delaware
BancBoston Investments Inc.                           Massachusetts
  BancBoston Capital, Inc.                            Massachusetts
</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1



The following certification is provided by the undersigned to
accompany the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities law:



Each of the undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-Q fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Coast Federal Litigation Contingent Payment Rights Trust.



|
|
|
|
|
|
|



Dated: May 7, 2003
### SERVE D AUGUS T 9 , 201 1 •nrpARTMEN T O F '.OCKETOPERATlON

o

U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C I N TH E MATTERO F FROSTA D ATELIER , INC . FA A DOCKE T No . |T 0 B E ASSIGNED ] (Civi l Penalty Action ) FDM S No . FAA-2011-029 4 ORDE RGRANTIN GMOTIO N T O CONTINU E HEARIN G Responden t

FrostadAtelier , Inc . ("Respondent" ) on Augus t 5 , 2011 , move dt o continu e th e hearing . Th e hearin g currentl y i s schedule dt o begi n o n Augus t 30 , 20 1 i . I n suppor t o f il s motion . Responden t

cite s unavoidabl e calenda r conflicts . Complainan t ha s not filedaresponse . Respondent' s motio n i s hereb y GRANTED . Th e hearin g wil l b e continue dt o a later date , whic hwill b e set

b y subsequen t

order . 

# XiiZit\~;:(z^(i^ ^ Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t RichardC . Goodwi n Administrativ e La

w Judg eFDM S No . FAA-20 1 i-029 4 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n .80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Davi dW . Williams , Respondent' s Counse l Attorne y at

La w 1637 2 Underbil l Lan e Huntingto n Beach , C A 9264 7 TEL : 714-745-561 0 Lis aJ . Toscano , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AWP-7 " Western-Pacifi c Regio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n P.O . Bo x 9200 7 Lo s Angeles , C A 90009-200 7 TEL : 310-725-711 0 FAX : 310-725-681 6 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC . Goodwin , Administrativ e IM WJudg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-A dviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-7536 ,

' Service wa

s b y U.S . Mail . Fo

r servic e i n perso n o r b y expeditedcourier , use Ui

c followin g address : Federa

l Aviatio n AdniinisUalion , 60

0 Independence Avenue . S.W. . Wilbu r Wrigh t Building — Suile 2W]00 aWashington , D C 20591 , Aitention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk, AGC-430 .
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4188 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit trading of water and 

water rights for future delivery, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2024 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. MARKEY, and Mr. SANDERS) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Commodity Exchange Act to prohibit trading 

of water and water rights for future delivery, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Future of Water Act 

5 of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4188 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF TRADING IN WATER AND WATER 

2 RIGHTS FOR FUTURE DELIVERY. 

3 (a) COMMODITY EXCHANGE ACT.—Section 1a(9) of 

4 the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a(9)) is amend5 ed— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘(7 U.S.C. 13–1)) and’’ and in7 serting ‘‘(7 U.S.C. 13–1)),’’; 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘water or water rights (or any 

9 index, measure, value, or data related to water or 

10 water rights), and’’ after ‘‘receipts), and’’; and 

11 (3) by striking ‘‘receipts) in which’’ and insert12 ing ‘‘receipts, and water or water rights, or any 

13 index, measure, value, or data related to water or 

14 water rights) in which’’. 

15 (b) PUBLIC LAW 85–839.—The first section of Pub16 lic Law 85–839 (7 U.S.C. 13–1) is amended in the first 

17 sentence of subsection (a)— 

18 (1) by inserting ‘‘water or water rights (or any 

19 index, measure, value, or data related to water or 

20 water rights),’’ after ‘‘sale of’’; and 

21 (2) by striking ‘‘receipts)’’ and inserting ‘‘re22 ceipts),’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
### Served: July 22 , 201 1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 22 nd day of J uly , 2011

Essential Air Service at

DEVILS LAKE AND JAMESTOWN,

NORTH DAKOTA

Under 49 U.S.C. 41731 et seq

. Docket DOT

- OST

- 1997

- 2785

NOTICE OF EXTENSION

On July 15, 2011, Mesaba Aviation, Inc., Pinnacle Airlines, Inc., and SkyWest Airlines , all

operating as Delta Connection, filed 90

- day notices of their intent to suspend services at 24

Essential Air Service ( EAS ) communities , including Devils Lake and Jamestown, North

Dakota . Prior to the airlines’ announcement , the Department solicited proposals for EAS at

the ab ove communities, whose contract was due to expire, a nd established a due date for

proposals. As a result of the filing of these notices and in order to attract as broad a n array

of proposals as possible, we have decided to issue an Order soliciting a new round of

proposals, including a revised due date for the above communities. Carriers who were

prepared to submit proposals by the previously stated due date should wait until the

Department issues the forthcoming Order requestin g proposals.

Dennis DeVany, Chief,

EAS and Domestic Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the at

http://www.regulations.gov
# TRUSTED WORLDWIDE SINCE 1908

SPECIFICATIONS 

# INSTANTEYE

u Aircraft Weight: ~1 lb. 

### u Dimensions: 9"x9" 

### u Plug-n-Play Payloads: Real-time video, thermal, IR flood 

### u Propulsion: 4 brushless electric motors 

### u Video Range: LOS 650 – 1200 m 

### u Control Interface: Handheld GCS, digital encrypted 

### u Stowage: Waterproof custom fit case, 2 Instant Eye aircrafts, 1 GCS, batteries, charger, spare motors and propellers 

### u GCS: Trans-reflective daylight readable screen 

### u Service Ceiling: 12,000+ ft. MSL 

### u Wind Station Holding: 30+ mph 

### u Endurance: 20-35 minutes (Payload dependent)



## CONTACT DARLEY FOR A DEMO LOW COST, LIGHTWEIGHT ELECTRIC SUAS

Included Components Custom Fit Padded Case 

### Designed to be rapidly deployed to gather local (<1200 m) short term (<35 min.) situational awareness. The InstantEye is capable of flying in inclement weather including winds exceeding 30 mph, heavy rain/snow, altitudes up to 12,000 ft. MSL, and temperatures between -10 to 115o F. The standard payload consists of three fixed EO cameras with IR illumination for night capability. Other plug and play payloads include a gimbaled, zoomable, LWIR thermal imager, drop mechanism, and high resolution camera. Kit includes two InstantEye aircrafts, compact ground station controller, batteries, charging system, and spare components.



# KEY FEATURES

u Deploys in seconds 

### u Military utility demonstrated 

### u Covert day/night (thermal) real time aerial ISR 

### u All weather, winds 30+ mph 

### u Compact size 

### u Operated by individual Responder 

### u Data products on GCS (networked through relay) or recorded by GCS DVR

MIKE MOCERINO

ROBOTICS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

630.363.7288 • MIKEMOCERINO@DARLEY.COM

WWW.DARLEYDEFENSE.COM •   
No. 55230.

#### Fleming-Joffe, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 133607-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with'stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES HALL and LYDIA HALL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SHASTA, JIM FARMER,

JERRY SHEARMAN, CITY OF

REDDING, SHASTA COUNTY, and

DOES I-XXX, in their official

and individual capacities,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

JAMES HALL and LYDIA HALL,

Plaintiffs,

v.

COUNTY OF SHASTA, JIM FARMER,

JERRY SHEARMAN, and CITY OF

REDDING, 

Defendants.

_____________________________/

No. CIV-S-04-0796 MCE/KJM

RELATED CASE ORDER

No. CIV-S-05-0784 GEB/JFM

Examination of the above-entitled civil actions reveals that

these actions are related within the meaning of Local Rule 83-

123(a) (E.D. Cal. 1997). 

Case 2:04-cv-00796-MCE -KJM Document 6 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The actions involve many of the same defendants and are based on

the same or similar claims, the same property transaction or

event, similar questions of fact and the same questions of law,

and would therefore entail a substantial duplication of labor if

heard by different judges. Accordingly, the assignment of the

matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial

savings of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient

for the parties. 

The parties should be aware that relating the cases under

Local Rule 83-123 merely has the result that both actions are

assigned to the same judge; no consolidation of the action is

effected. Under the regular practice of this court, related

cases are generally assigned to the district judge and magistrate

judge to whom the first filed action was assigned. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated CIV-S05-0784 GEB/JFM, JAMES HALL AND LYDIA HALL v. COUNTY OF SHASTA is

reassigned to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. and Kimberly J.

Mueller for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set

in this reassigned case only is hereby VACATED. The parties are

referred to the attached Order Requiring Joint Status Report. 

Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case

shall be shown as CIV-S-05-0784 MCE/KJM.

///

///

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-00796-MCE -KJM Document 6 Filed 04/28/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make

appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to

compensate for this reassignment. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: April 27, 2005

__________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:04-cv-00796-MCE -KJM Document 6 Filed 04/28/05 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4014 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4014

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that income 
 received by a regulated investment company from precious metals shall 
                    be treated as qualifying income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2024

 Ms. Cortez Masto introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
                and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that income 
 received by a regulated investment company from precious metals shall 
                    be treated as qualifying income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Precious Metals Parity Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF INCOME RECEIVED BY REGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES 
              FROM PRECIOUS METALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 851(b)(2)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or foreign currencies'' and inserting ``, 
        foreign currencies, or precious metals,'', and
            (2) by striking ``or currencies'' and inserting 
        ``currencies, or precious metals''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 8649)

Entry No. 29686.

#### Consumer Service Co. *v.*United States

(Decided September 14, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated above consists of electric bulbs imported from Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade for export to the United States including the costs of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value or export value less buying commission. There was no higher foreign value for such or similar merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Reap-praisement enumerated above may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

*508On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value was the appraised value, less buying commission.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

v. : No. 05-576-02

:

SHAMEK HYNSON :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2022, it is hereby ORDERED Defendant

Shamek Hynson’s Motion for Clarity (ECF No. 506) is GRANTED IN PART.

1

It is further ORDERED the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Hynson copies of the 

documents docketed at ECF Nos. 500 and 501.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez s

Juan R. Sánchez, C.J. 

1 Hynson wrote the Court on July 8, 2022, requesting clarity as to the status of his motion 

for relief under Section 404 of the First Step Act. This Court denied Hynson’s motion for relief

on June 3, 2022. See Mem., ECF No. 500; Order of June 3, 2022, ECF No. 501. The Clerk of 

Court will send Hynson additional copies of these documents.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL A. COX,

Petitioner,

v.

WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison,

Respondent.

No. 2:04-CV-0065 MCE CKD

DEATH PENALTY CASE

ORDER

On May 29, 2015, the court granted in part petitioner’s motion to perpetuate testimony. 

(ECF No. 157.) The court permitted petitioner to preserve the testimony of Dr. Albert Globus, 

five social history witnesses, and Juror Kurtzman. The court ordered the parties to meet and 

confer, within thirty days of the court’s order, regarding the method for taking the testimony of 

the six lay witnesses. In the meantime, respondent sought, and was denied, reconsideration of the 

May 29 order. (ECF Nos. 160, 163.) Petitioner now files a status report partly describing the 

parties’ discussions regarding the perpetuation of testimony and requesting the court set a 

schedule for respondent to move for discovery prior to the testimony deposition or depositions. 

(ECF No. 164.) 

Petitioner’s filing leaves a number of questions unanswered. 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within ten days of the filed date of this order, respondent 

shall file a status report explaining the following:

Case 2:04-cv-00065-MCE-CKD Document 165 Filed 09/01/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

1. Whether, after review of discovery, he may be willing to stipulate to the submission of 

the declarations of the social history witnesses and Juror Kurtzman as their testimony;

2. Whether, after receipt of the discovery provided by petitioner on August 27, he intends 

to move for additional discovery prior to the taking of testimony; and

3. His position on the protective order proposed by petitioner, which this court has 

approved in Lenart v. Warden, 2:05-cv-1912 MCE CKD (ECF Nos. 139, 141).

Dated: September 1, 2015

Cox disco sts.or

_____________________________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00065-MCE-CKD Document 165 Filed 09/01/15 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9030-9031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3462]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-60,847]


Mid-West Wire Products Incorporated; Ferndale, MI; Notice of 
Termination of Investigation

    Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an 
investigation was initiated on January 29, 2007 in response to a 
petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Mid-West 
Wire Products Incorporated, Ferndale, Michigan.
    The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. 
Consequently, the investigation has been terminated.


[[Page 9031]]


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 21st day of February 2007.
Linda G. Poole,
Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7-3462 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1

STIPULATION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF HEARINGS ON MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.’S MOTION TO STAY AND ALBERT D. BOLT’S MOTION FOR 

FURTHER RELIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

G

o

o

d

win

Procter L

L

P

Exchange Place

Boston, M

A 02109-2881

William R. Warne (CASBN 141280) 

Philip T. Darke (CASBN 213598) 

DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

555 Capitol Mall, Tenth Floor 

Sacramento, CA 95814-4686 

Telephone: (916) 444-1000 

Facsimile: (916) 441-2100 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

ALBERT D. BOLT 

Todd M. Noonan (CASBN 172962) 

STEVENS & O’CONNELL LLP 

400 Capitol Mall, Suite 1400 

Sacramento, CA 95814 

Telephone: (916) 329-9111 

Facsimile: (916) 329-9110 

Deborah S. Birnbach (SBN 628243) 

David S. Schumacher (SBN 647917) 

James R. Sweet (SBN 646804) 

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 

Exchange Place 

Boston, MA 02109-2881 

Telephone: (617) 570-1000 

Facsimile: (617) 523-1231 

Attorneys For: Defendant 

MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

ALBERT D. BOLT 

Plaintiff, 

vs. 

MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No.S-04--893 WBS DAD 

STIPULATION FOR CONSOLIDATION 

OF HEARINGS ON MERRIMACK 

PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.’S MOTION 

TO STAY AND ALBERT D. BOLT’S 

MOTION FOR FURTHER RELIEF; 

PROPOSED ORDER 

Date: September 19, 2005 

Time: 1:30 p.m. 

Location: Courtroom 5 

Hon. William B. Shubb 

Plaintiff Albert D. Bolt (“Bolt”) and Defendant Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

(“Merrimack”), by and through their respective counsel (“the parties”), respectfully submit this 

Case 2:04-cv-00893-WBS-DAD Document 96 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 2

STIPULATION FOR CONSOLIDATION OF HEARINGS ON MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.’S MOTION TO STAY AND ALBERT D. BOLT’S MOTION FOR 

FURTHER RELIEF; PROPOSED ORDER

2

G

o

o

d

win

Procter L

L

P

Exchange Place

Boston, M

A 02109-2881

Stipulation for Consolidation of Hearings on Merrimack’s Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment 

Pending Appeal Without a Bond or in the Alternative With a Bond and Bolt’s Motion for Further 

Relief Under 28 U.S.C. § 2202. Following this Court’s June 17, 2005, Declaratory Judgment and 

Memorandum and Order re: Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment, Merrimack noticed its motion 

for August 1, 2005 and Bolt noticed his motion for August 22, 2005. The parties stipulate that both 

of these motions will be heard on September 19, 2005. 

Dated: July 29, 2005 /s/ William R. Warne_________________ 

William R. Warne 

DOWNEY BRAND LLP 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

ALBERT D. BOLT 

/s/ Deborah S. Birnbach_______________ 

Deborah S. Birnbach (SBN: 628243) 

GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 

Attorney for Defendant 

MERRIMACK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: August 1, 2005 

Case 2:04-cv-00893-WBS-DAD Document 96 Filed 08/02/05 Page 2 of 2