alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(V.D. 121)

#### Henry A. Wess, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 446, etc.

(Decided January 9, 1963)

*Tompkins é Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Cfuilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Richardson, Judge:

These matters are before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the second division of this court in *Henry A. Wess, Inc.*v. *United States,*47 Cust. Ct. 310, Abstract 66060, wherein the conclusion was reached upon the authority of *Henry A. Wess, Inc.*v. *United States,*43 Cust. Ct. 78, C.D. 2107, that appraisement of the involved merchandise, consisting of woodworking machinery, or parts thereof, some imported with and some imported without electric motors, was void, and that liquidation of the entries and filing of the protests were premature, in consequence of which, judgment was entered remanding these matters to a single judge sitting in reappraisement to determine the proper dutiable values in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C.A., § 2636(d)).

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts which establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the involved merchandise covered by the entries herein is export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, or section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as enacted prior to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and that such statutory value of said machines or parts, without motors, are the appraised values, less the values of such motors, and that such statutory value of said motors, imported with said machines or parts, is as follows:

> *344Value of one motor Total value of motors

> Invoices Entry No. Motors U.S. $ U.S. $

> 1 No. 1984 446 5 (#969) 426. 00 2, 556. 00

> 1(#940) 68. 00 204. 00

> 1 No. 2288 594 5 (#969) 426. 00 2, 556. 00

> 1(#940) 68.00 204. 00

> 1 No. 1385 159 1(#940) 68. 00 408. 00

> 1 No. 3219 593 1(#975

> [Ai 400]) 65.50 65. 50

> 1(#970

> [Di 600]) 97.00 97.00

> 1 No. 2038 492 none

> [Em 800]

> 1 No. 1974 546 5 (#969) 426. 00 2, 556.00

> 1 No. 3367 640 5 (#969) 426. 00 2, 556. 00

On tbe agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, or section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as enacted prior to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for determining the value of the involved merchandise and that such statutory value for each class of merchandise is as hereinabove set forth.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# sec5_snc_2018

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2018-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SNC - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BAugust 2018
Exhibit 11



                     IBP, inc. and SUBSIDIARIES
                  COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
              YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 28, 1996 (52 WEEKS),
      DECEMBER 30, 1995 (52 WEEKS) AND DECEMBER 31, 1994 (53 WEEKS)

                 (In thousands except per share data)

                                                            


                                        1996          1995          1994
                                        ----          ----          ----  
FINANCIAL STATEMENT COMPUTATIONS:

Earnings before extraordinary item    $198,735      $280,112      $182,289
Extraordinary item                        -          (22,189)         -   
                                       -------       -------       -------
Net earnings                          $198,735      $257,923      $182,289
                                       =======       =======       =======

  
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Shares used in this computation:
Weighted average shares outstanding     94,688       94,745         94,870
Dilutive effect of shares under     
  employee stock plans                   1,944        1,926          1,293
                                        ------       ------         ------
Common and common equivalent shares     96,632       96,671         96,163
                                        ======       ======         ======     

Primary earnings per share:                 
Earnings before extraordinary item       $2.06       $2.90          $1.90
Extraordinary item                         -          (.23)           - 
                                          ----        ----           ---- 
Net earnings                             $2.06       $2.67          $1.90
                                          ====        ====           ====


FULLY-DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Shares used in this computation:
Weighted average shares outstanding     94,688      94,745        94,870
Dilutive effect of shares under     
  employee stock plans                   2,002       2,274         1,496
                                        ------      ------        ------
Common and common equivalent shares     96,690      97,019        96,366
                                        ======      ======        ======


Fully-diluted earnings per share:
Earnings before extraordinary item       $2.06       $2.89         $1.89
Extraordinary item                         -          (.23)          -  
                                          ----        ----          ----
Net earnings                             $2.06       $2.66         $1.89
                                          ====        ====          ====
No. 66809.

#### Abercrombie & Fitch Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/9653 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon wearing apparel similar in rase to wool wearing apparel, valued over $4 per pound, and that the issue is the same as that involved in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros. (47*C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[108th Congress Public Law 57]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ057.108]

[[Page 117 STAT. 858]]

Public Law 108-57
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 120 Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, as the ``Patsy Takemoto Mink 
     Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: July 14, 2003 -  [H.R. 2030]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 120 
Baldwin Avenue in Paia, Maui, Hawaii, shall be known and designated as 
the ``Patsy Takemoto Mink Post Office Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Patsy Takemoto Mink Post 
Office Building''.

    Approved July 14, 2003.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 2030 (S. 1145):
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):
            June 10, considered and passed House.
            June 25, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                      12,732,231
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,421,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,817,505
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,806,743)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,421,838
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,034,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             199,935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,234,609)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,234,609)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,234,609)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.108)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.108)


</TABLE>
20.01
----

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") of Strategic  Internet Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB  for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof. I, Ralph Shearing, Chief Executive Officer of  the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge andbelief:

| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|   |           |   |                          |
|--------|----------------|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |           |   |                          |
| Date:  | March 31, 2005 |   | /s/ Ralph Shearing            |
|   |                |   |                               |
|   |           |   | Ralph Shearing, CEO, Director |
|   |           |   |                          |

----
Log In | Subscribe | | русский| English Search

First Carrier AquaForce Chillers using HFO-1234ze

2015/08/02

30 July 2015

Europe’s first installation of a water-cooled screw chiller using new PUREtec HFO1234ze refrigerant has been completed

Two Carrier AquaForce water-cooled screw chillers using new PUREtec HFO-1234ze 

refrigerant (GWP 7) have been installed as part of the Plan-les-Ouates district heating 

project in Geneva, Switzerland.

The first phase of the mixed-use real estate development project in Plan-les-Ouates uses 

recovery and re-use of waste heat from adata centre onsite, providing heating to local 

offices and other facilities.

As part of the second phase, the extended installation is expected to provide heating to 

3,000 individual homes within a planned residential zone.

To view the complete content, please log in.

Username/ID

Password *Forgot Password?

Log in

Latest JARN Magzine

Samsung Targets 

US$ 10 Billion in 

Air Solutions 

Annual Sales by 

2020

JCI & Hitachi 

Joining Forces to 

Achieve the Same 

HVAC Vision

Mitsubishi Electric 

Makes Global Move 

with M&A

Daikin TIC Opening Ceremony

1 2 3 4 5

Home Magazine Markets Products Editorial Interviews Company Events Statistics WebNews

JARN (Japan Air Conditioning, Heating & Refrigeration News) Page 1 of 2

https://www.ejarn.com/news.aspx?ID=35619 12/9/2015
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers

 Confirmation of Employee Reasonable Accommodation (RA) Request

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT 

Authority: Sections 501, 504 and 701 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; ADA Amendments of 2008; Executive Order 13164 (July 

28, 2000); and Executive Order 13548 (July 10, 2010).

Purpose: The purpose of this system is to allow FLETC to collect and maintain records on applicants for employment as well as 

employees with disabilities who requested or received reasonable accommodation as required by Sections 501, 504, and 701 of the 

Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the ADA Amendments of 2008.

Routine Uses: System of Records Notice (SORN) DHS/ALL-033 located at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2011-07-13/

html/2011-17548.htm.

Disclosure: Disclosure of this information is voluntary. Failure to provide requested information may lead to a delay in processing 

and/or denial of the request based on inadequate data on which to continue processing.

Employee Name: Employee Phone/Email Address: 

Job Title, Series & Grade: Directorate/Division/Branch/Office: 

Supervisor Name: Supervisor Phone: 

Briefly describe the nature of the physical or mental condition requiring accommodation:

Describe the specific accommodation(s) being requested (if known): 

Describe how the requested accommodations will assist the employee in performing the essential duties of their

Printed Name and Signature of Individual Submitting Request: Date of Request: 

FTC 256-05-01 (01/20) Page 1 of 1

position, using the job application process, or taking advantage of a benefit or privilege offered by FLETC:
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATION
I, Elaine Swygert, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of HorizonMedical Products, Inc.;
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and otherfinancial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for theregistrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004
 
/s/ Elaine Swygert
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0472 SAT Date: 6/7/2013 Print Date: 7/2/2013

Related cases : : Yes Health related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: SENS-S,L; MUTA; ONCO; DEVEL; MALE REPRO; LIVER; KIDNEY; REPRO; BLOOD; AQUATOX
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: -13-0472 FATE: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = -0.31 (E) S > 10 g/L at 25 C (E) VP = 0.22 torr at 25 C ( N OMO5) BP = 215 C ( N OMO5) based on 66 C @ 2.7 mm Hg (M) H = 1.93E-7 (E) log Koc = 1.0 (E) log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)log Fish BAF = -0.036 (E) POTW removal (%) = 0 Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = low PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorbed all routes (analog); expect oxidation of the vinyl ether with spontaneous rearrangement and release of acetaldehyde. Concern for skin and lung sensitization, mutagenicity, oncogenicity, developmental toxicity, male reproductive, liver, and kidney toxicity based on the epoxide moiety. Concern for oncogenicity, reproductive toxicity, and blood toxicity based on vinyl ethers

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 8.9 daphnid 48-h LC50 >100 green algal 96-h EC50 >100 fish

_ chronic value 1.0 daphnid

_ chronic value >10

algal

_ chronic value >10
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for vinyl ethers and monoepoxides; SAR chemical class = vinyl ether, monoepoxide; MW 144; log Kow = -0.31 (EPI); liquid with mp unknown (P); S = 501 g/L at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 100

SARs vinyl ethers and monoepoxides SAR Class vinyl ether, monoepoxide Ecotox Category N one
Ecotox Factors Comments:SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
```

                                                       EXHIBIT 32

                   CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF
               TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Navistar  Financial
Corporation  (the  "Corporation"),  subsidiary  of  International
Truck and Engine  Corporation,  on Form 10-K for the period ended
October  31,  2003 as filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,  Phyllis E.
Cochran,  Principal  Executive Officer and I, Andrew J. Cederoth,
Principal   Financial   Officer  of  the  Corporation,   certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  § 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
            13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of
            1934; and

(2)   The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
            in all material  respects,  the  financial  condition
            and result of operations of the Corporation.

   /s/ PHYLLIS E. COCHRAN
    Phyllis E. Cochran
       Principal Executive Officer
       December 18, 2003

   /s/ ANDREW J. CEDEROTH
    Andrew J. Cederoth
       Principal Financial Officer
       December 18, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to § 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by
the  Company  for  purposes  of  Section  18  of  the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended,  or  otherwise  subject to the
liability  of that  section.  This  certification  shall also not
be deemed to be  incorporated  by reference into any filing under
the  Securities  Act of  1933,  as  amended,  or  the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934,  as amended,  except to the extent that the
Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
```
EX-23.b
Consent of Independent Auditors


                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Kansas City Life Insurance  Company (the Company) of our report dated January
24, 2000 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of the Company as
of  December  31,  1999 and for each of the two years in the  period  then ended
included in the 2000 Annual Report to Shareholders of Kansas City Life Insurance
Company.

Our audits also included the financial  statement  schedules of Kansas City Life
Insurance  Company as of December  31, 1999 and for each of the two years in the
period then ended listed in item 14(a).  These schedules are the  responsibility
of the Company's  management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits. In our opinion,  the financial  statement  schedules  referred to
above, when considered in relation to the basic financial  statements taken as a
whole,  present  fairly,  in all material  respects,  the  information set forth
therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statement
(Form S-8 No.  2-97351)  pertaining  to the Savings and Profit  Sharing  Plan of
Kansas City Life  Insurance  Company of our report  dated  January 24, 2000 with
respect to the consolidated  financial statements referred to above incorporated
by reference  and our report dated March 24, 2000 with respect to the  financial
statement  schedules  referred to above in the Annual  Report (Form 10K) for the
year ended December 31, 2000.


                                                               Ernst & Young LLP


Kansas City, Missouri
March 28, 2001
Order entered January 13, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 00192 - CR RITO DUENAS - QUINTERO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F - 1354251 - Y



### O RDER Before the Court is the State’s January 12, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file its brief in this case

. The brief was tendered to the Court along with the motion. We GRANT the State’s motion. The State’s brief is deemed filed as of the date of this order

. /s/ ADA BROWN PRESIDING JUSTICE
Before the First Division,

March 17, 1949

No. 52939.

#### Lampson Fraser & Huth, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 93344-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 1 73

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)