alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX10-2



Exhibit 10.2



AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT



This amending agreement is made effective as of May 27, 2008 between My Screen Mobile, Inc. (the "Company") and Weather Investments S.P.A. (the "Purchaser").



WHEREAS:





	The Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase Agreement") dated May 15, 2008 with the Purchaser pursuant to which the Company agreed to issue to the Purchaser (or to a company affiliated therewith) 12,500,000 shares of its common stock and warrants to acquire up to 20,000,000 shares of its common stock in consideration for US$10,000,000 at the closing of the transactions contemplated thereby (the "Closing");


	Under Section 4.1 of the Purchase Agreement, the Company covenanted and agreed to appoint a Chief Financial Officer of the Company as instructed by the Purchaser at or prior to Closing;


	The parties desire to amend the terms of the appointment of such officer under the Purchase Agreement;



NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follow:





	The second sentence of Section 4.1 of the Purchase Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety as follow:



"In addition, the Company covenants and agrees to appoint a Chief Financial Officer of the Company as instructed by the Purchaser within 15 days of the Closing".




	All other terms of the Purchase Agreement shall remain unchanged.



 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have agreed to cause this agreement to be dated as of the day and year first above written.



	
Weather Investments S.P.A.



/s/ Naguib Sawiris

_______________________

Name:  Naguib Sawiris

Title:     Chairman
	
My Screen Mobile, Inc.



/s/ Terry Rodrigues

_______________________

Name:  Terry Rodrigues

Title:     Director
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMEN T A L PROTECT I ON AGEN CY WASH I NGTON , D
. C
. 20460

Memorandum DATE : November 3, 20 14 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY A N D POLLUTI O N P R EVE NTI O N

SUBJECT: Transm i ssion of Background Materials and Charge to the Panel for the December 2 through 5 , 2014 Session of the FIFRA Scientific Advi sory Panel (SAP) Entitled "Integrated Bioactivity and Exposure Ranking: A Computationa l Approach for the Prioritization and Screening of Chemicals in the Endocrine D i sruptor Screening Program" TO:

FROM:

THRU: Fred Jenkins , Ph.D. Designated Federal Official FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Office of Science Coordination and Policy Steven M. Knott , Director Exposure Assessment Coordination and Policy Divis ion Office of Science Coordination and Policy David Dix, Ph.D
. , Director Office of Science Coordination and Policy Transmitted with this memo are copies of the EPA white paper, all background documents, and the charge to the Panel for the December 2 through 5, 2014 session of the FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) reviewing the top ic: "Integrated Bioactivity and Exposure Ranking : A Computationa l Approach for the Prioritization and Screening of Chemicals in the Endocrine D i sruptor Screening Program." These documents do not contain any information protected by copyright, protected under statute as Confidential Business Information (CBI) or protected from disclosure to foreign and multi

-national pesticide producers under FIFRA Section 1 O(g). The attached documents include the following: Document Title Date Integrated Bioactivity and Exposure Ranking: A Computational Approach for the Prior itizat ion and Screening of Chemicals in the Endocrine Disruptor November 3 , 2014 Screening Program December 2014 FIFRA SAP Charge Questions November 3, 2014 Appendix 1: ER AUC Scores for Reference Chemicals November 3, 2014 Appendix 2: ER AUC Scores for All Chemicals November 3, 2014 Appendix 3: Supplementary Data November 3, 2014 Appendix 4: NICEATM Uterotrophic Database for Guideline Like Studies November 3, 2014 Appendix 5: Uterotrophic Study Design Radar Plots November 3, 2014 Appendix 6: Detailed Review ofUterotrophic Study

- ToxCast Discordance November 3, 2014 Appendix 7: AR AUC Scores for Reference Chemicals November 3 , 2014 Appendix 8 : AR AUC Scores for All Chemicals November 3, 2014
No. 60829.

#### Keuffel & Esser Co. *v.*United States,

protest 261187-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

__________________________________________________________________

No. DA 21-0215

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRUCE ALAN GARAY,

Defendant and Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

ORDER

__________________________________________________________________

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension

of time to and including June 15, 2022, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 18 2022

04/18/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0215
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

      Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp.(the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

      (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

   Dated: August 9, 2005                   BY: /s/ Thomas J. Stirnweis
                                               --------------------------
                                                      (Signature)
                                               THOMAS J. STIRNWEIS
                                               Vice President, Treasurer and
                                                Chief Financial Officer

   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

   The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 5693] 

The Government of the Republic of Guatemala has informed the Government of the United States of its interest in an extension of the Memorandum of Understanding Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Republic of Guatemala Concerning the Imposition of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Objects and Materials from the Pre-Columbian Cultures of Guatemala which entered into force on September 29, 1997, and was extended on September 29, 2002. 

Pursuant to the authority vested in the Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to the requirement under 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of this Memorandum of Understanding is hereby proposed. 

Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the views and recommendations of the Cultural Property Advisory Committee regarding this proposal will be requested. 

                    A copy of the Memorandum of Understanding, the designated list of restricted categories of material, and related information can be found at the following Web site:                     *http://exchanges.state.gov/​culprop.*

Dina Habib Powell, 

Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

 [FR Doc. E7-3384 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action WOrXsheet with S6

QPM#

AIR-ANM.Q30-F7

Date: April 19, 2010

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

FDMS Docket No. FAA-29Ct WIG ,.- 0"(, S'6

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (f.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Perso~Contacted Date

Air Transport Association Mark Lopez I Fob 18,2010

Boeing Todd Esselstyn I March 5, 2010

UNCONTROLLEO COPY WHEf'l DOWNLOADED

Check the Master Lisl to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use

I
# C_2018166EN.01002902.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/29

---

Order of the General Court of 19 March 2018 –Pio de Bragança v EUIPO — Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (QUIS UT DEUS)

(Case T-229/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark QUIS UT DEUS - Failure to apply for renewal of registration of the mark - Cancellation of the mark upon expiry of the registration - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 166/38)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Duarte Pio de Bragança (Sintra, Portugal) (represented by: J. Sardinha, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ordem de São Miguel da Ala (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: J. Motta Veiga, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 February 2016 (Case R 621/2015-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Duarte Pio De Bragança and Ordem de São Miguel da Ala.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.

1

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ARTHUR ANDERSON,

Petitioner, No. CIV-04-1172 GEB GGH P

vs.

CA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, et al.,

Respondents, ORDER

 /

Petitioner has requested a 90-day extension of time to file his objections to the

February 2, 2007, findings and recommendations. Petitioner has also requested the appointment

of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas

proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C.

§ 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case “if the interests of justice

so require.” See Rule 8(c), Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does

not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present

time. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's February 15, 2007 request for an extension of time is partially

granted; 

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-01172-GEB-GGH Document 72 Filed 02/26/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2. Petitioner is granted twenty days from the date of this order in which to file his

objections to the February 2, 2007, findings and recommendations;

3. There will be no further extension of time; and 

4. Petitioner’s February 15, 2007, request for appointment of counsel is denied

without prejudice.

DATED: 2/26/07

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009/bb

ande1172.111

 

Case 2:04-cv-01172-GEB-GGH Document 72 Filed 02/26/07 Page 2 of 2
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
  





 
 October 13, 2016 
 Jason
M. Hollar 
 Dear Jason, 
 On behalf of Sears Holdings
Corporation (“SHC”), subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee”) of Sears Holdings Corporation’s Board of Directors, I am pleased to provide you, effective October 14, 2016, with the
following changes to your position and compensation: 
  

	 	1.	You will serve as and have the title of Chief Financial Officer of Sears Holdings Corporation. 

  

	 	2.	You will receive base salary at an annual rate of $700,000. 

  

	 	3.	You will receive a one-time special payment of $100,000, subject to applicable tax withholdings, within thirty (30) days following December 31, 2017, provided you remain actively employed by SHC through the
date payment is made. 

  

	 	4.	Subject to all terms and conditions of the Sears Holdings Corporation Annual Incentive Plan, including but not limited to the requirement you remain actively employed by SHC through the payment date, your minimum annual
incentive bonus for the 2017 and 2018 fiscal years shall be $287,500. 

  

	 	5.	To clarify and confirm the treatment of the Special LTI Award, as provided for under the offer letter you executed on September 18, 2014 (the “Offer Letter”): If you are involuntarily terminated without
Cause or terminate for Good Reason (as such terms are defined by the Executive Severance Agreement between SHC and you, executed on September 18, 2014 (the “ESA”)) before October 6, 2017, you shall be entitled to the third
installment of the Special LTI Award provided for under the Offer Letter, to be paid in a lump-sum net of applicable withholdings within thirty (30) days of your last day worked. 


 

	 	6.	The definition of Good Reason provided in Section 2(c) of the ESA shall be expanded to include a material diminution in your authority, duties, or responsibilities. This paragraph constitutes an amendment to the
foregoing provision of the ESA. 

 All terms and conditions of your employment not specifically addressed in this letter remain in full force
and effect, including but not limited to the terms of the Offer Letter and ESA, both dated September 18, 2014. 
 (Signatures on next
page) 







 Jason M. Hollar 

October 13, 2016 
 Page 2 

To acknowledge and accept these changes, please sign and date below. 
  

 

					
		 	Very truly yours,
		 	
		 	/s/ Tiffany Morris
	 	 	 	 	Tiffany Morris
		 		 	Vice President, Human Resources
	 Accepted:
	 		 	
			
	 /s/ Jason M. Hollar
	 		 	10/13/16
	Jason M. Hollar	 		 	Date
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

THOMAS STEWART, JR., Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 18-0892 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR 2002-020994 

The Honorable Cari A. Harrison, Judge (Retired)

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

APPEARANCES

Maricopa County Attorney Office, Phoenix

By Andrea Kever

Counsel for Respondent

Thomas Stewart, Jr., Phoenix

Petitioner

FILED 8-6-2019
STATE v. STEWART

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Maria Elena Cruz, and Judge 

James B. Morse Jr. delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Thomas Stewart, Jr., seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant 

to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s eighth

petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction 

relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s 

burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying 

the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1

(App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on 

review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the 

petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse 

of discretion. 

¶4 For the foregoing reasons, we grant review and deny relief.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00346-CV

IN RE MATTHEW JAMES 

LEACHMAN

RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied. Nothing in this opinion shall be construed as a ruling on 

the trial court’s failure to rule on the merits of “Relator’s Verified Petition To Take 

Deposition Before Suit,” which remains pending in the trial court until ruled on by 

that court.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

LIVINGSTON, C.J. would request a response.

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
2

DELIVERED: August 23, 2012
No. 57691.

#### Railway Express Agency *v.*United States,

protest 211146-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
From: jptgilmore@hotmail.com

To: george.wellington@dot.gov CC: charles.hunnicutt@troutmansanders.com; pat.snyder@troutmansanders.com; brent.connor@troutmansanders.com Subject: United States, Barbados Reach Open

- Skies Agreement Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 01:51:4 1 +0100

AirOne Ventures Limited : Applications Docket DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0134

Mr. Wellington:

I note the July 2 Departmental Press Release DOT 132

- 10 below.

While this constitutes a material change in the bilateral regime as it realtes to the above noted a pplications, I believe my submissions in those applications deal with such an eventuality.

Accordingly I will not be requesting leave to file further submissions as a result of this development and thought I should so advise you to permit your continued d eliberations on those applications unimpeded by concern for any further action on my part.

I have copied this E

- Mail to Counsel to the Applicant and have posted it on the Docket.

Sincerely,

John P.T. Gilmore 205

– 4250 St. Ambroise Montreal, Quebec Can ada H4C 3R4 Telephone: 514 716 7665
E

- Mail : jptgilmore@hotmail.comDOT 132

- 10

Friday, July 2, 2010 Contact: Bill Mosley Tel.: (202) 366

- 4570

United States, Barbados Reach Open

- Skies Agreement

Representatives of the United States and Barbado s have reached an Open

- Skies Agreement
that will liberalize U.S.

- Barbados air services for airlines of both countries. Barbados will become the 99th U.S. Open

- Skies partner.

“This agreement means the travelers, airlines and economies of both the United S tates and Barbados will benefit from competitive pricing and more convenient service,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. Upon signature of the agreement, airlines from both countries will be allowed to select routes, destinations and prices fo r both passenger and cargo service based on consumer demand and market conditions. The agreement, which was reached on July 1, provides airlines, for the first time, with codesharing and intermodal rights. The previous U.S.

- Barbados air service agreement, signed in 1982, contained restrictions on the cities that carriers could serve and placed limits on charter operations. The new agreement will remove these restrictions and provide important enhanced cargo rights.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Be th Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 5, 2015

t0602 

# Order

Clerk June 5, 2015

150395

In re Application of CONSUMERS ENER GY

COMPANY for Reconciliation of 2009 Costs

__________________________________________

TES FILER CITY STATION LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP,

Appellant,

v SC: 150395

COA: 305066

Public Service Commission:

CONSUMERS ENERGY COMPANY, 00

- 015675

Petitioner

- Appellee,

and

MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

and ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 25, 2014

judgment of the Court of Appeal s is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral

argument on whether to grant the application or take other action. MCR 7.302(H)(1).

The parties shall file supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order

addressing when the Michigan De partment of Environmental Quality’s administrative

rules requiring generators to purchase NOx allowances were “implemented,” as that term

is used in MCL 460.6a(8). The parties should not submit mere restatements of their

application papers.
No. 62556.

#### H. S. Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 328571-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential Proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.