alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4174 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4174

   To amend title IV of the Public Health Service Act to direct the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a clearinghouse on 
           intellectual disabilities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2024

Mr. Schmitt (for himself and Mr. Ossoff) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title IV of the Public Health Service Act to direct the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a clearinghouse on 
           intellectual disabilities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Think Differently Database Act''.

SEC. 2. CLEARINGHOUSE ON INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES.

    Subpart 7 of part C of title IV of the Public Health Service Act 
(42 U.S.C. 285g et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 450 (42 
U.S.C. 285g-2) the following:

``SEC. 450A. CLEARINGHOUSE ON INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with the Director 
of NIH and the Director of the Institute, shall establish within the 
Department of Health and Human Services, a publicly available 
clearinghouse to provide information with respect to resources and 
information for people with an intellectual disability and the 
caregivers and families of such people. Such clearinghouse shall 
include--
            ``(1) information on individual community-based services 
        and long-term support services available to individuals 
        eligible for medical assistance under a State plan under the 
        Medicaid program under title XIX of the Social Security Act (or 
        a waiver of such plan);
            ``(2) information on how to obtain health care, mental 
        health care, and other relevant services; and
            ``(3) a searchable database of such resources that may be 
        searched by postal ZIP Code.
    ``(b) Promotion.--The Secretary shall, as applicable and 
appropriate, identify and disseminate promotional activities to 
improve, among people with an intellectual disability and the 
caretakers and families of such people, the awareness of the resources 
included in the clearinghouse established under subsection (a).
    ``(c) Model.--In establishing the clearinghouse under this section, 
the Secretary may use the website thinkdifferently.net as a model.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

N OT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

E DWARD EGNELL , A ppellant ,

v. Case No

. 5D 21 -2 370 LT Cas e No. 2020-CP-15490

ESTATE OF BE ATE M. D IETZ, CHRISTIAN DIETZ , STEFANIE D. SIMPSON, AND ANGELIKA TEMPLE ,

Appellee s. ________________________________/

Decisio n filed J uly 27, 2022 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County , Morgan Laur Reinman, Judge. Elizabeth Siano Harris, of Harris Appellate Law Office, Mims, for Appellant.

Maureen Monaghan Matheson , of Mathes on Appellate Law, P .A., Satellite Beach, and Carmine D

. Gigliotti, of

T he Law Office of

C armine D. , P.A., Melbourn e, for Appellee s.
PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EVANDER, COHEN an d EISNAUGLE , JJ. , concur.
|  |
|--|
|  |

| MCD
  | Nonferrous Castings (MA33E)**NOTE: ASCII text files are       replaced with Portable Data Format (PDF) files. Worksheet files are available       only in the WK3 format. Please direct any questions and/or comments by e-mail       to our Information Services Center.**********Frequency: annual**PDF FORMAT** Years available |        1999 |        1998-Revised May 2000        |        1997 | **TEXT FILE FOR VIEWING (ASCll       text)** Years available        1997 |        1996 |        1995 |        1994 |        1993 |        1992 |**WORKSEET FILES ('WKl' format)** Years available        1997 |        1995 |        1994 |        1993 |**WORKSHEET FILES ('WK3' Format)** Years available        1999 |        1998-Revised May 2000       |        1997 |        1996*******************Data are available before       1992. Send your request by e-mail       or call the Information Services Center at 301-457-4673 or fax 301-457-4632.*** Go back to list of Current Industrial Reports******** |
|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Census 2000 |  Subjects A to Z  |  Search |  Product Catalog  |  Data Access Tools |  FOIA   |  Privacy · Policies |  Contact Us |  Home
Last revised:Wednesday, 08-Nov-00 13:04:29
-1-

Case No. 

04-1005 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBIT 3 OF THE DECLARATION OF FRANK A. 

CIALONE IN SUPPORT OF MINEGAR ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC. AND PETER J. MINEGAR’S BILL OF COSTS 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

S H

A

R T S I S F

R I E S E L L P

ONE MARITIME PLAZA

EIGHTEENTH FLOOR

SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111-3598

SHARTSIS FRIESE LLP

FRANK A. CIALONE (Bar #172816) 

ERICK C. HOWARD (Bar #214107) 

One Maritime Plaza, 18th Floor 

San Francisco, California 94111-3598 

Telephone: (415) 421-6500 

Facsimile: (415) 421-2922 

Attorneys for Defendants 

MINEGAR ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 

INC., AND PETER J. MINEGAR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

CONCRETE WASHOUT SYSTEMS, INC., a 

California corporation, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

MINEGAR ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 

INC., a California corporation, PETER J. 

MINEGAR, and DOES 1 - 10, 

Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

No. CIV.S-04-1005 

[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: REQUEST TO 

FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBIT 3 OF THE 

DECLARATION OF FRANK A. 

CIALONE IN SUPPORT OF MINEGAR 

ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, INC. 

AND PETER J. MINEGAR’S BILL OF 

COSTS 

The Court considered the Request To File Under Seal Exhibit 3 Of The Declaration Of 

Frank A. Cialone In Support Of Minegar Environmental Systems, Inc. And Peter J. Minegar’s Bill 

Of Costs. For good cause appearing: 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Request is GRANTED. The Exhibit 3 of the 

Declaration of Frank A. Cialone shall be filed under seal. 

DATED: July 26, 2005 

NAB\6773\001\1312592.01 

Case 2:04-cv-01005-WBS-DAD Document 111 Filed 07/27/05 Page 1 of 1
EUROPEAN MICRO HOLDINGS, INC.

EXHIBIT 11.01     STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS

The calculation of earnings per share is detailed in the table below:

                                                   THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                      SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                 ------------------------
                                                      2000        1999

EARNINGS

Net income (loss) (in thousands)                      $(68)       $207

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES

Outstanding common stock during the period       4,933,900   4,933,900
Contingently issuable shares                        68,054      85,107

BASIC WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES          5,001,954   5,019,007
Effect of dilutive stock options and other               -         995
contingent shares

DILUTED WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES        5,001,954   5,020,002

Basic earnings (loss) per share                     $(0.01)      $0.04

Diluted earnings per share (loss per share)         $(0.01)      $0.04


During the  three-month  period-ended  September  30, 2000,  the Company  issued
warrants  and  options  to  purchase  1,185,000  shares of its  common  stock at
exercise  prices ranging from $4.55 to $10.00.  The above dilutive  earnings per
share  calculations  exclude  the effect of  warrants  and  options to  purchase
1,185,000 and 339,000  shares of common stock for the  three-month  period ended
September 30, 2000 and 1999, respectively, at exercise prices ranging from $4.55
to $12.00 and $9.1875 to $12.00, respectively,  because they were anti-dilutive.
Also, see Note 5 to the Consolidated  Condensed Financial  Statements related to
contingently issuable shares related to an acquisition. The effect of contingent
shares related to the guaranteed  earn-out amount not paid at the closing of the
Sunbelt  acquisition  and the effect of  satisfactory  completion of part of the
second  contingent  earn-out has been  included in the above basic  earnings per
share  calculations.  The  effect  of  contingent  shares  related  to the first
earn-out of American Micro is not included,  as such payment was paid in cash in
March  2000.  The effect of  contingent  shares  related to second  earn-out  of
American Micro is not included,  as the amount of such  contingent  shares to be
issued is unable to be determined. Also see Notes 10 and 13.
November 29, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10378.

#### Stockheimer *&*Harder and American Foreign Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

Entered at New York, N.Y. Reap. Dec. 10355. Motion by defendant.
No. 64837.

#### Air Clearance Association, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33730 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2021
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Walter Maurice Savage,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-1079 MCE PAN P

vs. Order

State of CA, et al.,

Respondents.

-oOoFebruary 6, 2006, petitioner requested an extension of time

to object to January 24, 2006, findings and recommendations. 

Good cause appearing, petitioner’s request is granted and time is

extended until 10 days from the date this order is signed. No

further extensions will be granted absent a showing of manifest

injustice.

So ordered.

Dated: February 9, 2006. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01079-MCE -PAN Document 24 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 1
# sec6_rbalsh_2022

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RBS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10December 2021
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 11/3/2023 1

Voters’ Right 

to a Completely Open Primary Election 

Snellgrove v. Georgia (Hugh Lawson, M.D. Ga. 5:02-cv-288) 

Four days before a primary election, independent voters filed a federal complaint complaining that the primary election prevented 

them from voting for a member of one party for one office and a 

member of a different party for another office. After an evidentiary 

hearing on the day before the election, the district judge declined to 

issue an injunction. 

Subject: Voting procedures. Topic: Primary election. 

Four days before an August 20, 2020, primary election in Georgia, three independent voters filed a federal complaint in the Middle District of Georgia 

complaining that the primary election prevented them from voting for a 

member of one party for one office and a member of a different party for another office.1

 The court recognized the complaint as seeking a preliminary 

injunction.2 With their complaint, the plaintiffs filed a notice that the matter 

would be heard on Monday, three days later.3

From 10:30 a.m. until noon, Judge Hugh Lawson held an evidentiary 

hearing.4

 At 1:45 p.m., he announced his decision declining to issue an injunction.5

 His opinion issued on the following day explained, 

There is not now, nor has there ever been a constitutional right to vote 

for the candidate of choice in the sense that Plaintiffs contend. Rather, there 

exists only the right to have meaningful access to the electoral process. . . . 

. . . Certainly some restrictions employed by the various states have 

failed to withstand constitutional scrutiny. However, a state regulation, such 

as the one at issue here, restricting an elector from voting in the primary 

election of more than one political party, has never been held unconstitutional, and the Court declines to do so now.6

On September 3, Judge Lawson granted a voluntary dismissal.7

1. Complaint, Snellgrove v. Georgia, No. 5:02-cv-288 (M.D. Ga. Aug. 16, 2002), D.E. 1; 

see Travis Fain, Lawsuit Seeking to Stop Houston Primary Elections, Macon Telegraph, Aug. 

17, 2002, at B3 (“In Georgia, voters don’t have to declare a party when they register to vote 

and may request either a Republican or Democrat ballot on primary day.”). 

2. Docket Sheet, Snellgrove, No. 5:02-cv-288 (M.D. Ga. Aug. 16, 2002). 

3. Notice, id. (Aug. 16, 2002), D.E. 2. 

4. Minutes, id. (Aug. 20, 2002), D.E. 7. 

5. Opinion, id. (Aug. 20, 2002), D.E. 8; Minutes, supra note 4. 

6. Opinion, supra note 5, at 2. 

7. Dismissal, Snellgrove, No. 5:02-cv-288 (M.D. Ga. Sept. 3, 2002), D.E. 10; see Travis 

Fain & Debbie Rhyne, Men Drop Primary System Lawsuit, Macon Telegraph, Sept. 5, 2002, 

at B2.
No. 58931.

protests 942355-G, etc. (New York).

#### Kung Chen Fur Corpn. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Cold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
No. 67851.

#### Hi Test Twist Drill Works, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/25100, etc.

Plaintiffs’ application for hearing denied.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 MERCURY AIR GROUP, INC CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 CERTIFICATION I, Joseph Czyzyk, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on SEC Form 10-K of Mercury Air
Group, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have; a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c. disclosed in this report any changes in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions); a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. /s/ JOSEPH CZYZYKJoseph CzyzykChief Executive Officer and Director September 28, 2004
No. 54032.

#### French Italian Wine Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 117174-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection VII&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-12	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 2/10/21
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2022, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James R. Hill, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:February 23, 2023By/s/ Abu M. ArifAbu M. ArifChief Executive Officer


Date:February 23, 2023By/s/ James R. HillJames R. HillChief Financial Officer








E-7
No. 56407.

protest 153216-K (Baltimore).

#### F. W. Tracy *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the record disclosed that the protest was filed prior to liquidation. In view of the provisions of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the protest was dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANNE NELSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1103 DFL KJM PS

vs.

PLACER COUNTY, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Presently calendared for hearing on July 20, 2005 are plaintiff’s motion to strike

defendants’ initial disclosures, plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a motion to strike defendants’

answer, and plaintiff’s motion to file a second amended complaint and to supplement plaintiff’s

initial disclosures. As provided by Local Rule 78-230(h), the court has determined that the

matter will be submitted on the papers without oral argument; the July 20th hearing is vacated. 

An order resolving the merits of plaintiff’s motions will issue shortly.

DATED: July 12, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006 nelson.vachrg

Case 2:04-cv-01103-DFL -KJM Document 48 Filed 07/12/05 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         293,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  278,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               571,000
<PP&E>                                      12,178,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (330,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,679,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          842,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        57,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,679,000
<SALES>                                        596,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               772,000
<CGS>                                          833,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  833,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (7,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
Docket No: FAA-2015-6546 Dir ID: 2015-NM-179-AD

Record of

Discussion

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval

Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED

Gulfstream Aerospace

Corporation

Multiple Multiple Continued Operational

Safety of Product and AD

actions/termination

Other/Additional Information: Gulfstream concurs with all aspects of this AD action.
Before the First Division,

October 16, 1951

No. 55923.

protests 166971-K, etc. (New York).

#### Fleming Joffe, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.