alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(V.D. 103)

#### L. Batlin & Son, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 751550-3.

(Decided October 29, 1959)

*Broolcs d JBroolcs*for tbe plaintiff.

*George Goehran Dowb,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

This matter is before me on remand from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *L. Batlin & Son, Inc.*v. *United States,*42 Cust. Ct. 331, Abstract 62892, and it has been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise consists of binoculars and cases which were held by the Court in Abstract 62892 to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of article.

> 2. That the market value or the price of the instruments and eases herein at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was as follows:

> Instrument Case Total Item

> $8. 00 $1.00 $9. 00 ‘RENOX” binoculars

> *4553. That there was no higher foreign value.

> 4. That the instant case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I hold that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vitasti, Inc.  (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Tammy-Lynn McNabb, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: May
      15,
      2006


By: /s/
      TAMMY-LYNN MCNABB





Name:
      Tammy-Lynn McNabb


Title:
        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American
Express Certificate Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), Paula R. Meyer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and Brian J. McGrane, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



   /s/ Paula R. Meyer
   --------------------
Name:  Paula R. Meyer
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  April 13, 2004





   /s/ Brian J. McGrane
   ----------------------
Name:  Brian J. McGrane
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  April 13, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
and is not being "filed" as part of Amendment No.1 to the Form 10-K or as a
separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to
liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is
expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 1404

FAISAL AMIN

,

Petitioner

,

v.

ROBERT M. WILKINSON

, Acting Attorney General

,

Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : February 4, 2021 Decided: February 11, 2021

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Faisal Amin , Petitioner Pro Se

. Anthony Cardozo Payne

, Assistant Director, Lance Lomond Jolley, Office of Immigration Litigation

, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Faisal Amin , a native and citizen of Pakistan

, petition s for review of an order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed

the administrative record and the Board’s order and c onclude that the Board did not abuse

its discretion in denying the motion as untimely. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (2020). We

therefore deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Amin

,

(B.I.A. Mar. 11, 2020). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2018

No. 04-18-00769-CV

Rolando Rafael SAENZ and Alberto Ortiz,

Appellants

v.

LAS BLANCAS MINERALS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Pedro I. Saenz, Jr., as General 

Partner of Las Blancas Minerals Limited Partnership, Pedro I. Saenz, Jr., Individually, Maria 

Graciela Saenz Martinez, as General Partner of Las Blancas Minerals, L.P., San Pedrominerals, 

Limited Partnership, as General Partner of Blanca Minerals, L.P., Saenz Management Co., 

Limited Liability Company, as General Partner of Las Blancas Investments, Limited Partnership,

Appellees

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVQ002991D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The docketing statement was due on November 5, 2018, but has not been filed. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 32.1(a) (providing an appellant in a civil case shall file a docketing statement promptly 

upon filing the notice of appeal). We order appellant to file the docketing statement by 

November 29, 2018.

Furthermore, a filing fee of $205 was due when this appeal was filed, but it was not paid. 

See Tex. Sup. Ct., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, In Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, 

and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015). 

The fee remains unpaid, and appellant has not filed a sworn statement of inability to afford 

payment of court costs. 

We therefore order appellant, by November 29, 2018, to either: (1) pay the filing fee; or 

(2) provide written proof to this court that appellant is indigent or otherwise excused by statute or 

the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from prepaying fees and costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1 

(providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may proceed without 

advance payment of costs). 

If appellant fails to respond satisfactorily within the time ordered, this appeal may be 

dismissed without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (providing appellate courts may enforce 
rule requiring payment of costs “by any order that is just”), 42.3(c) (permitting appellate courts 

to dismiss an appeal when appellant fails to comply with a court order). 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of November, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
****
****
REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT ON THE ASSAULT WEAPONS BAN

Department of Treasury Press Release
**The following files are in PDF format and are best viewed withAcrobat 3****TABLE OF CONTENTS*****See bottom of page to download the entire report as one file*** Page Executive Summary  Background   Defining the Type of Weapon Under Review          Scope of "Sporting Purposes"   Method of Study   Suitability for Sporting Purposes           Determination141616192136 **Exhibits:**
White House Memorandum: Importation of Modified Semiautomatic     Assault-type RiflesStudy Rifle ModelsStudy RiflesATF Form 4590, Factoring Criteria for WeaponsMilitary ConfigurationMemorandum to File From First Meeting of Firearms Advisory     PanelState Fish and Game Commission Review
**Appendix:**
Summary of Externally Gathered Information for the Study on the SportingSuitability of  Modified Semiautomatic WeaponsHunting Guides
Magazine Editors
Comments Provided by State Fish and Wildlife Commissions
Comments Provided by Law Enforcement Agenices
Comments Provided by Industry Members and Trade Associations
Comments Provided by Interest Groups
Comments Provided by Individuals
Magazine Articles
Advertising

Download the complete report
CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS
  
 I,
Steven J. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., an Illinois
corporation (the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
the Report on Form 10-Q for the period of the Registrant ending June
30, 2009 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and
  (2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
 Dated:  August
14, 2009
 By                 /s/ Steven J.
Cohen
 Steven J. Cohen
 President and Director
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the First Division,

April 29, 1953

No. 57273.

protests 590738-G, etc. (New York).

#### Brenner Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free' entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
No. 49601.

#### Protests 39657-K, etc., of Morny Sales Co. (New York).

*256Opinion by

Walker J.

At the trial counsel agreed that the so-called pomanders are the same as the clove oranges the subject of C. D. 445, the record in which was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable as nonenumerated manufactured articles, as claimed. As to the potpourri and sweet jars two of the exhibits consist of eathenware jars or bowls filled with what appears to be a mixture of dried herbs and flowers and the third exhibit consists of a cellophane box containing a similar mixture. The owner of the importing firm testified that all three exhibits consist of a mixture of 15 or 20 dried herbs or flowers, thyme or lavendar flowers, or rose petals, verbena, wild or cultivated flowers or herbs, and that aromatic herbs really are the basic principle. ■ He stated that the articles are distinguished from sachet and articles of perfumery, in that the latter are always artificially made, i. e., must contain some essential oil added to a base, “either alcohol or orris root, or something of that sort.” However, in the opinion of two of defendant’s witnesses perfume has beeD added to exhibit 1 and 2, and they agreed with a third witness that if placed in a drawer or closet all three exhibits would scent the clothes. Plaintiff cited *Peek & Velsor*v. *United States*(T. D. 48428) and Abstract 41637 but the court found that the material there involved was not at all similar to that before it, and also found that the merchandise at bar is completely manufactured into an article having a use similar to that of sachet. On the record the protest was sustained as to the pomanders but overruled in all other respects.
No. 47842.

#### Petition 6300-R of Cresca Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the evidence produced the court was of the opinion that in making entry of the merchandise the petitioner acted in good faith. In accordance therewith the petition was granted.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129358 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 129358 

 COA: 261738 

St. Clair CC: 03-001365-FH 

ROY STEPHEN HAMILTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2005 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. On the Court’s own motion, 

we REMAND this case to the St. Clair Circuit Court for correction of the judgment of 

sentence. Defendant was sentenced to a prison term of five years to forty years for his 

conviction for felonious assault, MCL 750.82, as a fourth habitual offender, MCL 769.12. 

The maximum possible term of imprisonment for a fourth habitual offender convicted of 

felonious assault is fifteen years. MCL 769.12(1)(b). On remand, the trial court shall 

correct the judgment of sentence so that the maximum term of imprisonment for 

defendant’s felonious assault conviction is fifteen years. 

p0124 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 27, 2006 

Clerk
No. 57688.

#### Orbis Products Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 175590-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of camphor oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Orbis Products Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 1527), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 49149.

#### Protests 530928-G, etc., of John Zimmermann Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony showed that certain of the items in question consist of hats similar to those involved in' *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as to those items.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Fact book, fiscal year
** 
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2012
 
SuDoc Number:HE 20.3216:
Item Number:0507-E-09 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000599230
 
January 9, 2018****
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001052636
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   876,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               876,300
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 876,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    850,000
<COMMON>                                        26,300
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   876,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,949
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 15,949
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,949
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,949
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE DECEMBER 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              72
<SECURITIES>                                         6
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,219
<ALLOWANCES>                                        42
<INVENTORY>                                        941
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,428
<PP&E>                                           2,416
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,069
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,310
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,849
<BONDS>                                          2,166
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              403
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           338
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,370
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,310
<SALES>                                          8,292
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,292
<CGS>                                            6,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,047
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 226
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    789
<INCOME-TAX>                                       280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       509
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.08
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Barbara Riching, certifythat:

 

1.                                       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q/A of Abgenix, Inc.; and

 

2.                                       Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

 

Dated: July 21, 2004

 
|   | /s/ BARBARA RICHING                             |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   | Barbara Riching                                 |
|   | *Senior  Director, Finance*                     |
|   | *(Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
Before the Second Division,

June 14, 1956

No. 60048.

#### Manufacturers Steel Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 239119-K, etc. (New York).

*483Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Berber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
18.01 Capture a Check Online