alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2178

MICHAEL J. SINDRAM,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

S. RANDOLPH SENGEL; DIETRA Y. TRENT; MARK R.

WARNER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-04-1-JCC)

Submitted: December 9, 2004 Decided: December 14, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael J. Sindram, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko,

O’CONNEL, O’CONNELL & SARSFIELD, Rockville, Maryland; Martha

Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia,

for Appellees

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

We agree with the district court that Sindram has a history

of filing vexatious and frivolous cases, many of which resulted in

meritless appeals. If Sindram continues this conduct, which waste

judicial resources, this court will consider ordering sanctions and

a pre-filing injunction. 

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Michael J. Sindram appeals a district court order denying

his motion for reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure 60(b). We have reviewed the district court’s order and

the record and find the appeal frivolous. Sindram failed to allege

any proper grounds for reconsideration. Moreover, on appeal, he

failed to specifically challenge the district court’s findings in

this regard. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivolous.*

 We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 57262.

protests 120447-K/578, etc. (Chicago).

#### Imperial Gem Syndicate *v.*United States,

*429Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of beads made of tecali, which is the same material as used in-the stones involved in *L. Heller & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 1268). Since it was agreed that the beads are made of tecali, it was held that the-present merchandise consists of beads of semiprecious stones, for which there is no-specific provision. . Accordingly, the beads described on the invoices, as indicated, above, were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503, as claimed.
DO YOU EAT FISH?

Agency for Toxic Substances

and Disease Registry

EPA 823-H-01-001
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended March 26, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haig J. Nargesian,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ HAIG J. NARGESIAN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Haig J. Nargesian *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: May 6, 2004
__________________

* Haig J. Nargesian functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4201 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify the criteria 

for designation of rural emergency hospitals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 23, 2024 

Mrs. HYDE-SMITH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to modify 

the criteria for designation of rural emergency hospitals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rural Health Sustain5 ability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION OF 

7 RURAL EMERGENCY HOSPITALS. 

8 Section 1861(kkk)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1395x(kkk)(3)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4201 IS

1 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), 

2 by striking ‘‘as of the date of the enactment of this 

3 subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘as of January 1, 2014’’; 

4 (2) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

5 the end; 

6 (3) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period 

7 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

8 (4) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(C) was designated as rural by the Office 

11 of Rural Health Policy of the Health Resources 

12 and Services Administration.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4325 — BC Partners/Buziol/Fashion Box Group)

(2006/C 244/13)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 18 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:October16,
                2006
            By:
            */s/
              John B.
              Gallagher*Name:John
                B. Gallagher
                Title:Co-Chief Executive Officer




Date:October16,
                2006
            By:
            */s/
              Harry D.
              Shields*Name:Harry
                  D. Shields
                Title:Co-Chief Executive
                    Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

April 21, 1960

No. 64100.

protest 59/21613 (Los Angeles).

#### James G. Wiley *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                           EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY
 
                       STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF RATIO
                          OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,
                                                     --------------------------
                                                      1998     1997      1996
                                                     ------- --------  --------
<S>                                                  <C>     <C>       <C>
Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary
 loss..............................................  $25,708 $(26,055) $(38,248)
Fixed charges to be added back to earnings:
  Interest and debt expense........................   41,521   41,223    41,153
  Rentals (one-third of all rent and related costs
   charged to income)..............................    5,804    6,286     5,948
                                                     ------- --------  --------
    Total fixed charges............................   47,325   47,509    47,101
                                                     ------- --------  --------
Earnings before income taxes and fixed charges.....  $73,033 $ 21,454  $  8,853
                                                     ======= ========  ========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.................     1.54      .45       .19
                                                     ======= ========  ========
Amount by which earnings are inadequate to cover
 fixed charges.....................................  $   --  $(26,055) $(38,248)
                                                     ======= ========  ========
</TABLE>
----

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY  ACT**

I, Ralph Shearing, certify that:

 1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form  10-KSB of Strategic Internet Investments Incorporated; 

 2.      Based on my knowledge, this annual report  does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a  material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period  covered by this annual report; 

 3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,  and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present  in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and  cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual  report; 

 4.      The registrant's other certifying officers  and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant  and have: 

 a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures  to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its  consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 b)      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the  filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and 

 c)      presented in this annual report our conclusions  about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our  evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 5.      The registrant's other certifying officers  and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's  auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons  performing the equivalent functions): 

 a)      all significant deficiencies in the design  or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified  for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls;  and 

 b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that  involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal controls; and 

 6.      The registrant's other certifying officers  and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes  in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal  controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any  corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: April 13, 2004

 Signed: */s/ Ralph Shearing*                   Ralph Shearing 

----
No. 58949.

protest 243158-K (B) (New York).

#### Air Clearance Ass’n, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the papers disclosing nothing to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector, the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, William I. Miller, certify that:
     1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Irwin FinancialCorporation;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
    /s/ William I. Miller
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Daniel D. MaddoxDaniel D. MaddoxPrincipal Financial Officer
ACCEPTED 12-14-00321-CR TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS 4/7/2015 2:52:05 PM CATHY LUSK CLERK
DIRECTORY•DESC•SRPID•CONSULTANT•PHASE•STATUS•TRANSMIT•SUBMITDATE•PACKNUM DGW2H1P•DUPONT CHAMBERS WORKS DGW 2H10 PFOA•NJD002385730•URS•REMED ACTION•PACKAGED•A•04/29/11•
(Part 2SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection III) (U.S. Standard General LedgerAccount Transaction Postings)

 (R = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Reverse’ in the Comment. AP = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Also Post’ in the Comment.) (Bulletin No. 2019-02) (III AP - 10) (December 2018)
Before the Third Division,

June 14, 1956

No. 60053.

#### W. Y. Moberly *v.*United States,

protests 172032-K, etc. (Great Palls).

Opinion by

Donlon, J,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION   EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JOURNAL COMMUNICATIONS,  INC. AS OF AND FOR
THE YEAR ENDED  DECEMBER  31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         131,051
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  94,823
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    19,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               268,668
<PP&E>                                         427,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                 249,279
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 584,149
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,650
<BONDS>                                        1,643
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,600
<OTHER-SE>                                     444,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   584,149
<SALES>                                        732,420
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               732,420
<CGS>                                          398,050
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  628,768
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               230,718
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                   41,954
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            60,708
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   60,708
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  2.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.16
        


</TABLE>
No. 49628.

#### Protests 842814-G, etc., of Heinsheimer Bros., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony showed that certain of the merchandise consists of ramie hats similar to those involved in protest 969066-G (Abstract *26247291), and that other items consist of hemp hats similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), which records were admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith* these items were held dutiable at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD ENDING SPETEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                       9,364,635
<SECURITIES>                                 6,960,808
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,200,854
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (334,802)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            20,503,198
<PP&E>                                       3,584,868
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,390,909)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,914,794
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,709,682
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,818
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,914,794
<SALES>                                      6,341,556
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        4,354,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,684,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (393,096)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (35,917)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (429,013)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)



</TABLE>