8400 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices 

Deere’s alleged financing of certain 

EVSPFHs; (3) with respect to the ALJ’s 

application of the ‘‘all or substantially 

all’’ standard, including a statement of 

the type and number of sales relied on 

and the basis for reliance on those sales, 

especially the basis for including used 

sales of North American-version 

harvesters in the assessment of whether 

that standard has been met by Deere; 

and (4) on whether all or substantially 

all of Deere’s sales of SPFHs were of 

North American versions of these 

machines. The Commission has 

determined not to review Order No. 59. 

Schedule for Written Submissions: 

Written submissions on the issues under 

review are limited to the parties and 

must be filed by March 6, 2007. Reply 

submissions must be filed by March 13, 

2007. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

Issued: February 20, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–3139 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–585] 

In the Matter of Certain Engines, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing the Same; Notice of 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review ALJ Order No. 7 Granting 

Complainant’s Motion To Add a Claim 

to the Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) (Order No. 7) granting 

complainant’s motion to add a claim to 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–

205–3152. Copies of the ID and all other 

nonconfidential documents filed in 

connection with this investigation are or 

will be available for inspection during 

official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 

p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 19, 2006, the Commission 

instituted an investigation under section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, based on a complaint filed by 

American Honda Motor Company, Inc. 

of Torrance, California, alleging a 

violation of section 337 in the 

importation, sale for importation, and 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain engines, 

components thereof, and products 

containing the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,706,769 (‘‘the ’769 

patent’’) and 6,250,273. 71 FR 61799 

(Oct. 19, 2006). The complainant named 

Wuxi Kipor Power Co., Ltd. of Jiangsu, 

China as a respondent. 

On January 30, 2007, the ALJ issued 

Order No. 7 granting complainant’s 

motion to add dependent claim 6 of the 

’769 patent to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. No party 

petitioned for review of Order No. 7, 

and the Commission has determined not 

to review it. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

Issued: February 20, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–3249 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1122–0007] 

Office on Violence Against Women; 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Extension of a Currently 

Approved Collection; Comments 

Requested 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Semi-Annual 

Progress Report for the Grantees from 

the Legal Assistance for Victims Grant 

Program. 

The Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women (OVW) has 

submitted the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. This 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register Volume 71, Number 243, page 

75984 on December 19, 2006, allowing 

for a 60-day comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until March 28, 2007. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to The Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices 8401 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Extension of a currently approved 

collection. 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: SemiAnnual Progress Report for Grantees of 

the Legal Assistance for Victims Grant 

Program. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department of Justice sponsoring the 

collection: Form Number: 1122–0007. 

U.S. Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: The affected public includes 

the approximately 200 grantees of the 

Legal Assistance for Victims Grant 

Program (LAV Program) whose 

eligibility is determined by statute. In 

1998, Congress appropriated funding to 

provide civil legal assistance to 

domestic violence victims through a setaside under the Grants to Combat 

Violence Against Women, Public Law 

105–277. In the Violence Against 

Women Act of 2000 and again in 2005, 

Congress statutorily authorized the LAV 

Program. 42 U.S.C. 3796gg–6. The LAV 

Program is intended to increase the 

availability of legal assistance necessary 

to provide effective aid to victims of 

domestic violence, stalking, or sexual 

assault who are seeking relief in legal 

matters arising as a consequence of that 

abuse or violence. The LAV Program 

awards grants to law school legal 

clinics, legal aid or legal services 

programs, domestic violence victims’

shelters, bar associations, sexual assault 

programs, private nonprofit entities, and 

Indian tribal governments. These grants 

are for providing direct legal services to 

victims of domestic violence, sexual 

assault, and stalking in matters arising 

from the abuse or violence and for 

providing enhanced training for lawyers 

representing these victims. The goal of 

the Program is to develop innovative, 

collaborative projects that provide 

quality representation to victims of 

domestic violence, sexual assault, and 

stalking. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: It is estimated that it will 

take the approximately 200 respondents 

(LAV Program grantees) approximately 

one hour to complete a semi-annual 

progress report. The semi-annual 

progress report is divided into sections 

that pertain to the different types of 

activities that grantees may engage in 

and the different types of grantees that 

receive funds. An LAV Program grantee 

will only be required to complete the 

sections of the form that pertain to its 

own specific activities. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The total annual hour burden 

to complete the data collection forms is 

400 hours, that is 200 grantees 

completing a form twice a year with an 

estimated completion time for the form 

being one hour. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Suite 1600, Patrick 

Henry Building, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: February 21, 2007. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. E7–3183 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FX–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Antitrust Division 

Notice Pursuant to the National 

Cooperative Research and Production 

Act of 1993—Open Mobile Alliance 

Notice is hereby given that, on 

January 18, 2007, pursuant to Section 

6(a) of the National Cooperative 

Research and Production Act of 1993, 

15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), the 

Open Mobile Alliance (‘‘OMA’’) filed 

written notification simultaneously with 

the Attorney General and the Federal 

Trade Commission disclosing changes 

in its membership. The notifications 

were filed for the purpose of extending 

the Act’s provisions limiting the 

recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 

damages under specified circumstances. 

Specifically, 2–800 Mobiles Inc., New 

York, NY; Ad Vitam, Olivet, FRANCE; 

Advanced Strategies Corp., Garden City, 

NY; Along Mobile Technologies, Inc., 

Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province, PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Alox Co., Ltd., 

Kangnam-gu, Seoul REPUBLIC OF 

KOREA; Anyka (Guangzhou) Software 

Technology Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, 

Guangdong, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA; ATIO Corporation, Coombe 

Place, Rivonia, SOUTH AFRICA; CA 

Inc., Islandia, NY; Calton Hill, 

Edinburgh, UNITED KINGDOM; Cell 

Guide, Rehorot, ISRAEL; Ceno 

Technologies, Ltd., Shanghai, PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA; China 

Telecommunications Corporation, 

Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA; Cyberlink Corporation, HsinTien City, Taipei Hsien, TAIWAN; 

Datang Mobile Communication 

Equipment Co. Ltd., Beijing, PEOPLE’S 

REPUBLIC OF CHINA; DGIST, DeoksanDong, Daegu, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; 

Digital Connect PTE Ltd., Singapore, 

SINGAPORE; DKI Technology Inc., 

Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Elcoteq 

SE, Salo, FINLAND; Estacado Systems, 

LLC, Dallas, TX; Frost & Sullivan China, 

Beijing, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF 

CHINA; GaeaSoft Corporation, Seoul, 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Gemalto N.V., 

Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS; GMV 

Soluciones Globales Internet, S.A., 

Madrid, SPAIN; Hanmaro Co. Ltd., 

Seoul, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; IfEN 

GmbH, Poing, GERMANY; Marvell 

International Ltd., Hamilton, 

BERMUDA; Miyowa, Marseille, 

FRANCE; Mobiletop Co., Ltd. Seoul, 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA; Monotype 

Imaging Inc., Woburn, MA; MOSSEC—

Mobile Security Software, Madrid, 

SPAIN; Motive, Inc., Austin, TX; Movell 

Software, Santa Clara, CA; MStar 

Semiconductor, Inc., Hsinchu Hsien, 

TAIWAN; NineOne Co., Ltd., Kyongsan, 

Kyong-Buk, REPUBLIC OF KOREA; 

NOW Wireless Ltd., Croydon, UNITED 

KINGDOM; NXP Semiconductors, 

Eindhoven, NETHERLANDS; Perlego 

Systems, Inc., Gig Harbor, WA; Pointsec 

Wireless Solutions, Stockholm, 

SWEDEN; Protect Software GmbH, 

Dortmund, GERMANY; Purple Labs 

S.A., Le Bourget Du Lac, FRANCE; SIRF 

Technologies, San Joe, CA; Smith Micro 

Software, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA; Sonus 

Networks, Inc., Chelmsford, MA; Square 

Enix, Inc., El Segundo, CA; Synkia Sp. 

z.o.o., Krolewska, NORWAY; 

TechnoCom Corporation, Carlsbad, CA; 

Telefonica S.A., Madrid, SPAIN; 

TeleworX Group, Inc., McLean, VA; 

Trademobile Limited, Wakatipu, New 

Zealand; Trango Systems, Grenoble, 

FRANCE; U-blox AG, Thalwil, 

SWITZERLAND; Unichal Inc., Seoul, 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA Virtual Logix, 

Monigny-le-Bretonneux, FRANCE; Visa 

International Services Association, 

Foster City, CA; Vodaphone IT 

Hizmetleri A.S., Istanbul, Turkey; W2bi, 

Inc., Union, NJ; Webmessenger Inc., 

Tujunga, Ca; WINIT, Daejeon, 

REPUBLIC OF KOREA; and 

WISEWIRES Inc., Seoul, REPUBLIC OF 

KOREA, have been added as parties to 

this venture. 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES