alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 16, 2019

No. 04-18-00819-CV

Margarita MALDONADO,

Appellant

v.

Trenton FRANKLIN,

Appellee

From the 225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-24167

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion to Withdraw by Michael McEvilly is hereby GRANTED. 

It is so ORDERED on August 16, 2019.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 9/15/2023 1

Superseded Registration Form 

Brown v. Rokita (Richard L. Young, S.D. Ind. 1:08-cv-1484) 

On the day before the 2008 general election, a voter filed a class action challenging the nullification of her voter registration because 

she had not used the latest version of the voter-registration form. At 

a temporary-restraining-order hearing that day, the parties announced an agreement that would permit voters who submitted old 

registration forms to cast provisional ballots that would be counted 

if the registration applications included all necessary information. 

Subject: Registration procedures. Topics: Registration 

procedures; provisional ballots. 

On the day before the 2008 general election, a voter in Marion County, Indiana, the county that includes Indianapolis, filed a class action challenging the 

nullification of her voter registration because she had not used the latest version of the voter-registration form.1

 With her complaint, she filed a motion 

for a temporary restraining order.2

Judge Richard L. Young drew the case and held a hearing on the motion 

on the day that it was filed.3 At the hearing, the parties announced that they 

had reached an agreement.4 Provisional ballots cast by voters who used superseded registration forms would be accepted so long as the voter met eligibility requirements and the registration application included all necessary 

information.5 A hand-written agreement was filed with the court that day.6

Judge Young signed a stipulated dismissal on February 4, 2009.7

1. Complaint, Brown v. Rokita, No. 1:08-cv-1484 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 3, 2008), D.E. 2. 

2. Temporary-Restraining-Order Motion, id. (Nov. 3, 2008), D.E. 9. 

3. Minutes, id. (Nov. 3, 2008), D.E. 13; Interview with Hon. Richard L. Young, July 24, 

2012 (noting that if he had not been available the motion could have been heard by the motions judge on duty for that week). 

Tim Reagan interviewed Judge Young for this report by telephone on July 24, 2012. 

4. Minutes, supra note 3. 

5. Agreement, Brown, No. 1:08-cv-1484 (S.D. Ind. Nov. 3, 2008), D.E. 14. 

6. Id.

7. Order, id. (Feb. 4, 2009), D.E. 27.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       3,439,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,774,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   255,000
<INVENTORY>                                  8,260,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,531,000
<PP&E>                                     116,821,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              39,783,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             126,281,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,161,000
<BONDS>                                     69,792,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        52,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,990,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               126,281,000
<SALES>                                     33,683,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            45,753,000
<CGS>                                        8,255,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,928,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               110,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,376,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,134,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   588,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            546,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   546,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INTERNET SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC.
AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          79,096
<SECURITIES>                                    51,985
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,071
<INVENTORY>                                        571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               173,616
<PP&E>                                          21,768
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 204,632
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,151
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,272
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,632
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,508
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    31
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,207
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,056
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,151
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.16


</TABLE>
# attribtable--OUTPUT

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold"&9IV AT - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>   THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND THE 
STATEMENT OF INCOME AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO 
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            2,283
<SECURITIES>                                     22,290
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 24,943
<PP&E>                                            5,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   30,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             7,087
<BONDS>                                           2,710
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                         55,506
<OTHER-SE>                                     (34,522)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     30,781
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,008
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 14,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (229)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,301)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (12,301)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,301)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.27)
         

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Stephen K.Gartside, Jr., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of EvolvingSystems, Inc.
| /s/ STEPHEN K. GARTSIDE, JR.          |   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Stephen K. Gartside, Jr.         |   |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |   |
| November 13, 2006                     |   |   |

 

This certification is furnished with this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the ExchangeAct, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
<TABLE>
EXHIBIT 11(i)

                                       INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
                              COMPUTATION OF BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (In millions of dollars except for shares and per share amounts)

                                                          Years  ended  December 31,
                                        <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
                                        1997          1996          1995         1994         1993
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Earnings before effect of
  <S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
  accounting changes..........        $380.5        $358.0        $270.3       $211.1       $163.5
Effect of accounting changes:
  - Postemployment benefits               --            --            --           --        (21.0)
Net earnings applicable
  to common stock.............        $380.5        $358.0        $270.3       $211.1       $142.5

Average number of common
  <S>                             <C>          <C>           <C>          <C>          <C>
  shares outstanding..........    163,206,932  161,238,547   159,103,617  158,187,174  157,487,303

Basic earnings per share:
Earnings before effect of
  <S>                                  <C>           <C>           <C>         <C>          <C>
  accounting changes..........         $2.33         $2.22         $1.70       $ 1.33       $ 1.04
  Effect of accounting changes:
    - Postemployment benefits             --            --            --           --        (0.13)
Basic earnings per
  share.......................         $2.33         $2.22         $1.70       $ 1.33       $ 0.91

Notes:   All common share and per share amounts have been adjusted for the
3-for-2 stock split which was made in the form of a stock dividend in August of
1997.
</TABLE>
y ^ 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

ORANGE COUNTY SOARING 

ASSOCIATION, MARY RUST, 

LARRY TOUHINO and CHRIS MANNION, 

Complainants, 

V. Docket No. 16-09-13 

THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, 

Respondent. 

ORDER 

The Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") received the Respondent's, City of Riverside, 

written Motion for a 15 day extension of time in which to file an Answer to the Complainant's 

Complaint. Based on counsel's representation that there is no opposition to the request and based 

upon good cause shown that Counsel is moving between offices, the FAA hereby grants the 

request for an extension until December 2,2009. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 

Complainant's Motion for an Extension of Time to File Answer is hereby granted. Pursuant to 

14 C.F.R. § 16.19, the time period for filing an Answer to the complaint in this case pursuant to 

14 C.F.R. § 16.23(d) is extended for fifteen days to and including December 2, 2009. 

Respondent may file a reply within 10 days after the date of service of the Answer. 

landall S. Fi6rtz Date 

Director 

Office of Airport Compliance 

and Field Operations 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on November 13, 2009,1 caused to be placed in the United States 

mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy of the foregoing EXTENSION 

OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER addressed to: 

Ronald J. Cozad, Esq. 

Law Offices of Ronald J. Cozad 

2100 Palomar Airport Road, Suite 214 

Carlsbad, CA 92011 

Pamela J. Walls, Esq. 

Deina M. Smith, Esq. 

Attorneys for County of Riverside 

3535 Tenth Street, Suite 300 

Riverside, CA 92501-3674 

Colby Cataldi 

Assistant Director Aviation 

3403 Tenth Street, Suite 300 

Riverside, CA 92501 

Daryl Shippy 

Airports Manager 

37552 Winchester Rd 

Murrieta, CA 92563 

FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-610) 

Airport Compliance Division 

Office of Airport Compliance and Field Operations 

ACQ-100 

\/K^.P., 

XnneTorgerson, ACOk]X)0 

Office of Airport Compliance
No. 43999.

#### Protests 981132-G, etc., of Jacques Doueck & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

On the records presented the protests were overruled.
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 22.1

                                 SUBSIDIARY LIST

1.      AEG Finance Corp, a Delaware corporation, wholly owned by Maytag
        Aircraft Corporation

2.      Mercury Acceptance Corporation, Inc., a California corporation, wholly
        owned by Mercury Air Group, Inc.

3.      Maytag Aircraft Corporation, a Colorado corporation, wholly owned by
        Mercury Air Group, Inc.

4.      Mercury Air Cargo, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by
        Mercury Air Group, Inc.

5.      Hermes Aviation, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by Mercury
        Air Cargo, Inc.

6.      Pegasus de Mexico S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, owned 99% by
        Mercury Air Cargo, Inc. and 1% by Hermes Aviation, Inc.

7.      Excel Cargo, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by Mercury Air
        Group, Inc.

8.      Vulcan Aviation, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by Mercury
        Air Cargo, Inc.

9.      Maytag Aircraft Corporation, a Cayman corporation, wholly owned by
        Maytag Aircraft Corporation.

10.     Mercury Air Centers, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by
        Mercury Air Group, Inc.

11.     RPA Airline Automation Services, Inc., a Florida corporation, wholly
        owned by Mercury Air Group, Inc.

12.     RPA Airline Automation Services, Division El Salvador S.A. de C.V., an
        El Salvadorian corporation, 99% owned by RPA Airline Automation Service,
        Inc. and 1% owned by Mercury Air Group, Inc.

13.     Aero Freightways, Inc, a Canadian corporation, wholly owned by Excel
        Cargo, Inc.

14.     Hermes de Mexico S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, owned 99% by
        Mercury Air Cargo, Inc. and 1% by Hermes Aviation, Inc.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Mark I. Gittelman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.


|                           |  |                                          | 
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- | 
|                          
|Date: August
     12, 2008 |  | /s/
     Mark I. Gittelman               | 
|                           |  | Mark I. Gittelman                        | 
|                           |  | Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of | 
|                           |  | Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.              | 

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

COURTNEY J. LINN 

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, California 95814-2322

Telephone: (916) 554-2700

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 2:04-CV-1037-LKK-KJM

)

Plaintiff, )

) 

v. ) DEFAULT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE

) AND FINAL JUDGMENT OF 

APPROXIMATELY $11,690.00 ) FORFEITURE

IN U.S. CURRENCY, )

)

Defendant. )

______________________________)

This matter came on for hearing on June 15, 2005, before the

Honorable Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller, on plaintiff United

States’ motion for default judgment. Assistant U.S. Attorney

Courtney J. Linn appeared for plaintiff United States. There was no

appearance by or on behalf of any other person or entity claiming an

interest in defendant currency to oppose plaintiff’s motion. The

Magistrate Judge has recommended that plaintiff's motion for default

judgment be granted. Based on the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and

Recommendations and the files and records of the Court, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are

adopted herein.

Case 2:04-cv-01037-LKK -KJM Document 16 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

2. Francis G. Orr and Dennis R. Wheeler are held in default.

3. A judgment by default is hereby entered against any right,

title or interest in the defendant currency of Francis G. Orr and

Dennis R. Wheeler.

4. A final judgment is hereby entered, forfeiting all right,

title and interest in the defendant currency to the United States of

America, to be disposed of according to law, including all right,

title and interest of Francis G. Orr and Dennis R. Wheeler.

5. All parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. 

SO ORDERED, this 12th day of July, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01037-LKK -KJM Document 16 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           6,231
<SECURITIES>                                    19,310
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,324
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,825
<INVENTORY>                                     15,892
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,317
<PP&E>                                         105,898
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,740
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           45,296
<BONDS>                                         26,376
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           593
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,541
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,806
<SALES>                                        103,198
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               103,198
<CGS>                                           76,277
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,277
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   107
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,239
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,559
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,559
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44



</TABLE>
Before the Third Division,

December 23, 1942

No. 47841.

#### Petition 6218-R of Montgomery Ward & Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From a careful consideration of the evidence, the court was of the opinion that the petitioners acted in good faith and were without intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts, or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.