alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 160/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 160 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4911 July 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 160

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4911 July 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Council |
| 2006/C 160/1 | Information concerning the extension of the Grains Trade Convention, 1995 | 1 |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 160/2 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| 2006/C 160/3 | Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) | 3 |
| 2006/C 160/4 | Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 160/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4244 — Ravago/Muehlstein) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 5 |
| 2006/C 160/6 | List of agencies and laboratories which third countries have made responsible for completing the documents which must accompany each consignment of wine imported into the Community (Article 29 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Council

2006/C 160/1

Information concerning the extension of the Grains Trade Convention, 1995

1

Commission

2006/C 160/2

Euro exchange rates

2

2006/C 160/3

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)

3

2006/C 160/4

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1)

4

2006/C 160/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4244 — Ravago/Muehlstein) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

5

2006/C 160/6

List of agencies and laboratories which third countries have made responsible for completing the documents which must accompany each consignment of wine imported into the Community (Article 29 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 883/2001)

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Order entered August 6, 2021

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-00428-CV

MARCUS JARROD PAYNE, Appellant

V.

STACY ELEY (PAYNE), Appellee

On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-20-00663

ORDER

As directed to do so, appellant has filed written verification he has requested 

the reporter’s record. Because appellant filed a statement of inability to pay costs 

in the trial court and nothing before us reflects he’s been ordered to pay costs, we 

ORDER Donna Kindle, Official Court Reporter for the 303rd Judicial District 

Court, to file the reporter’s record without costs within thirty days of the date of 

this order. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 145.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Kindle and all parties.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### GO MEDICAL INDUSTRIES PTY, LTD., A.C.N. 009018339, Go Medical USA, Inc., and Alexander G.B. O’Neil, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. C.R. BARD, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-1326.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 2001.

ON MOTION

*ORDER*

Upon consideration of the stipulation of dismissal,

*956IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Medical Products,
Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Marshall B. Hunt
---------------------------
Marshall B. Hunt
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002
No. 46683.

#### Protests 2428-K, etc., of A. N. Deringer, Inc. (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C.D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The 'protests were sustained to that extent.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. 'SS'1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 'SS'1350, each of the undersigned certifies that
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of DSET Corporation.

      DATE: August 14, 2002           By: /s/ Dr. Binay Sugla
                                          --------------------------------------
                                              Dr. Binay Sugla,
                                              Chief Executive Officer

      DATE: August 14, 2002           By: /s/ Bruce M. Crowell
                                          --------------------------------------
                                              Bruce M. Crowell
                                              Vice President and Chief Financial
                                              Officer


                                       35
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Horizon Medical Products,
Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Vice President - Finance of the Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Julie F. Lancaster
-----------------------------------------------------
Julie F. Lancaster
Vice President - Finance
August 14, 2002
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Glen Echo Park.**
 
1988: 010304 | 1989: 020304 | 1990:01020304
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.98:
Item Number:0654-D
CGP systemNumber:000326392
 
February 11, 2020
Filed 10/ 7/13 P. v. Rogers CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.111 5(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

RONALD EUGENE ROGERS,

De fendant and Appellant. F065982

(Super. Ct. No. F12903935)



### OPINION

THE COURT * APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Alan M. Simpson, Judge. Deborah Prucha, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appell ant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Louis M. Vasquez and Lewis A. Martinez, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

- ooOoo

-

* Before Levy, Acting P.J., Kane, J. and Franson, J.2

.

Defendant Ronald Eugene Rogers contends on appeal that the abstract of judgment in his case does not reflect the trial court’s oral pronouncement of sentence. The People agree. Defendant pled no contest to possession of methamphetamine (Health & Saf. Code, § 11377, subd. (a)) and admitted a prior strike conviction. The trial court sentenced him to 16 months, doubled to 32 months because of the prior strike conviction. The court imposed a $240 fine pursuant to section 1202.4, 1 an additional $240 suspended fine purs uant to section 1202.45, a $296 probation report fee, and a few other fees. The abstract of judgment includes $480 fines, rather than $240 fines, pursuant to

sections 1202.4 and 1202.45. And, as the People note, the $296 probation report fee does
not app ear on the abstract. When there is a discrepancy between the trial court’s oral pronouncement rendering judgment and the abstract of judgment, the oral pronouncement controls; we presume any inconsistency is the result of clerical error and rely upon the o ral pronouncement contained in the reporter’s transcript. ( People v. Mitchell (2001) 26 Cal.4th 181, 185

- 186.) Accordingly, the abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect the oral pronouncement of judgment.

DISPOSITION The clerk of the superior c ourt is directed to correct the abstract of judgment to reflect a $240 fine pursuant to section 1202.4, a suspended $240 fine pursuant to

section 1202.45, and a $296 probation report fee. The clerk is directed to send a copy of

the corrected abstract to t he Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. As so corrected, the judgment is affirmed.

1 All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise noted.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8352]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3156]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration


North American Free-Trade Agreement, Article 1904 NAFTA Panel 
Reviews; Completion of Panel Review

AGENCY: NAFTA Secretariat, United States Section, International Trade 
Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of completion of panel review of the final affirmative 
antidumping determination made by the U.S. International Trade 
Administration, in the matter of Certain Softwood Lumber Products from 
Canada, Secretariat File No. USA-CDA-2002-1904-02.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Decision of the Binational Panel dated January 
5, 2007, respecting the motions to dismiss the final affirmative 
antidumping determination filed by the United States Department of 
Commerce and the Government of Canada, this proceeding was completed on 
February 16, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caratina L. Alston, United States 
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, 
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482-5438.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 5, 2007, the Binational Panel 
issued an order, which concluded that this matter has been rendered 
moot and granted the motions of the Administering Authority (the 
International Trade Administration) and the Government of Canada to 
dismiss this proceeding. The Secretariat was instructed to issue a 
Notice of Completion of Panel Review on the 31st day following the 
issuance of the Notice of Final Panel Action, if no request for an 
Extraordinary Challenge was filed. No such request was filed. 
Therefore, on the basis of the Panel Order and Rule 80 of the Article 
1904 Panel Rules, the Panel Review was completed and the panelists 
discharged from their duties effective February 16, 2007.

    Dated: February 20, 2007.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
 [FR Doc. E7-3156 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-GT-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DAIN
RAUSCHER CORPORATION'S DECEMBER 31, 1997 FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          35,909
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,480,448
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                            135,777
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0<F1>
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            541,511
<PP&E>                                          42,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,304,401
<SHORT-TERM>                                   179,000
<PAYABLES>                                   1,368,918
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   170,906
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0<F2>
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                             127,364
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,659
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,546
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     317,545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,304,401
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              152,150
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           122,492
<COMMISSIONS>                                  274,847
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  111,280
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   46,304<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,573
<COMPENSATION>                                 427,599
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,755
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      49,275
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,275
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.77
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDED IN RECEIVABLES
<F2>INCLUDED IN PAYABLES
<F3>INCLUDES FEES FROM ASSET MANAGEMENT ONLY
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit (23)


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
EASTGROUP PROPERTIES, INC.

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  registration  statements
(Nos.  333-134959 and  333-144785) on Form S-3 and the  registration  statements
(Nos. 33-60909, 333-91405,  333-51666, 333-117308 and 333-125719) on Form S-8 of
EastGroup Properties,  Inc. of our reports dated February 27, 2008, with respect
to the consolidated balance sheets of EastGroup Properties,  Inc. as of December
31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders'  equity  and cash  flows for each of the  years in the  three-year
period ended December 31, 2007, and all related financial  statement  schedules,
and the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over  financial  reporting  as of
December 31, 2007,  which reports  appear in the December 31, 2007 annual report
on Form 10-K of EastGroup Properties, Inc.

Our report  refers to a change in the  method of  accounting  for the  Company's
share-based payments as of January 1, 2006.

Jackson, Mississippi                           KPMG LLP
February 27, 2008


                                       62
#### Scott L. DENTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. State of ARIZONA; Department of Arizona Juvenile Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-16530.

D.C. No. CV-98-01663-RCB.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 21, 2001.

*554Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

Scott Denton (“Denton”) appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the State of Arizona (“State”) and the Arizona Department of Juvenile Corrections in his action for employment discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213, and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794(a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review the district court’s entry of summary judgment de novo. *DeGrassi v. City of Glendora,*207 F.3d 636, 641 (9th Cir.2000). We may affirm the district court’s order granting summary judgment on any ground fairly supported by the record. *Keyset v. Sacramento City Unified Sch. Dist.,*238 F.3d 1132, 1139 (9th Cir.2001).

We affirm summary judgment on Denton’s Title I ADA claim for money damages as barred by the Eleventh Amendment. *See Bd. of Trustees of the Univ. of Ala. v. Garrett,*531 U.S. 356, 121 S.Ct. 955, 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001). Additionally, we affirm summary judgment on Denton’s Title II ADA claim because Title II does not apply to claims of employment discrimination. *See Zimmerman v. State Dept. of Justice,*170 F.3d 1169, 1173 (9th Cir.1999).

Finally, even though Denton’s claim for injunctive relief is not barred by the Eleventh Amendment, we affirm summary judgment on Denton’s claim that the State failed to reasonably accommodate his disabilities in violation of the Rehabilitation Act and Title I of the ADA because Denton failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that he is a qualified individual, i.e., that he is capable of performing the *555essential functions of the job with reasonable accommodation. *See*42 U.S.C. § 12111(8); *Lucero v. Hart,*915 F.2d 1367, 1371 (9th Cir.1990); *Echazabal v. Chevron USA Inc.,*226 F.3d 1063, 1070 (9th Cir.2000).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

          <ARTICLE>     5
          <MULTIPLIER>     1,000
                 
          <S>                                <C>
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1998 
          <PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1998 
          <PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1998 
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
          <CASH>                                                    13,220
          <SECURITIES>                                                   0
          <RECEIVABLES>                                            342,497
          <ALLOWANCES>                                              18,333
          <INVENTORY>                                              307,382
          <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         675,873
          <PP&E>                                                   499,913
          <DEPRECIATION>                                           206,136
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,303,204
          <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    166,725
          <BONDS>                                                  589,200
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
          <PREFERRED>                                                    0
          <COMMON>                                                  52,277
          <OTHER-SE>                                               127,513
          <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,303,204
          <SALES>                                                1,960,250
          <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,960,250
          <CGS>                                                  1,406,434
          <TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,406,434
          <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
          <LOSS-PROVISION>                                           5,054
          <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        43,455
          <INCOME-PRETAX>                                          152,143
          <INCOME-TAX>                                              54,205
          <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       97,938
          <DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
          <EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
          <CHANGES>                                                      0
          <NET-INCOME>                                              97,938
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                                               1.88
          <EPS-DILUTED>                                               1.82
                  
          
</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 99-20392

KIMBERLY DAGLE BIGGS, Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; ET AL.,

Defendants, THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; MARVIN CURRIE, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees, CHARLES SHAFFER, Chief of Police,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-1203) June 28, 2000
Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
After reviewing the record and based on the briefs and arguments of counsel, we are satisfied that the district court2

correctly concluded that material issues of fact were presented on Chief Shaffer’s qualified immunity defense to Biggs’ sex discrimination claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.