alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          10,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  908,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (115,700)
<INVENTORY>                                     29,600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               868,800
<PP&E>                                      10,103,800
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,013,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,613,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,976,200
<BONDS>                                        544,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,638,800
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,613,500
<SALES>                                              0<F1><F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,078,700
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,882,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             123,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,058,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                   440,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            618,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   618,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
<FN>
<F1>WE HAVE NOT STATED SECURITIES SEPARATELY IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT MATERIAL.  WE HAVE INCLUDED THEM IN THE "CASH" TAG.
<F2>NET SALES OF TANGIBLE PRODUCTS IS NOT MORE THAN 10% OF TOTAL OPERATING
REVENUES.  WE THEREFORE HAVE NOT STATED THESE SALES SEPARATELY IN THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, PER REGULATION S-X, RULE 5-03(B).  WE HAVE INCLUDED
THESE SALES IN THE "TOTAL REVENUES" TAG.
<F3>WE HAVE INCLUDED COST OF TANGIBLE GOODS SOLD IN COST OF SERVICE AND
PRODUCTS IN OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE "TOTAL COST" TAG, PER REGULATION
S-X, RULE 5-03(B).
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
Order entered January 13, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00192-CR

RITO DUENAS-QUINTERO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1354251-Y

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s January 12, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file its 

brief in this case. The brief was tendered to the Court along with the motion. We GRANT the 

State’s motion. The State’s brief is deemed filed as of the date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 8/25/2023 1

School-Bond Opposition Dilution 

Duke v. Lawson 

(Charles Everingham IV, E.D. Tex. 2:11-cv-246) 

Voters opposing a school bond filed a federal complaint to enjoin 

the opening of school facilities for early voting. A magistrate judge 

denied the plaintiffs immediate relief, so the plaintiffs voluntarily 

dismissed the case. 

Subject: Voting procedures. Topics: Poll locations; early voting. 

Five voters opposing a school bond filed a federal action during early voting 

on the bond, claiming that the school district’s opening up school facilities 

for early voting diluted the votes of bond opponents.1 The school bond election was set to coincide with a May 14, 2011, municipal election for an overlapping municipality.2

 Early voting was set for May 2 through 10.3 The complaint, which sought a temporary restraining order, was filed on May 5.4

The case was referred to Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham IV, pursuant to a standing order.5

 On May 9, Judge Everingham heard and denied 

the plaintiffs’ motion.6

 The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the action on May 

16.7

1. Complaint, Duke v. Lawson, No. 2:11-cv-246 (E.D. Tex. May 5, 2011), D.E. 1. 

2. See id. at 4. 

3. See id. at 3. 

4. Docket Sheet, id. (May 5, 2011) (D.E. 1, 6). 

5. Order, id. (May 6, 2011), D.E. 2. 

Judge Everingham retired on October 1, 2011. General Order Appointing U.S. Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne, No. 11-14 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 3, 2011), txed.uscourts.gov/sites/default/ 

files/goFiles/GO-11-14.pdf. 

6. Minutes, Duke, No. 2:11-cv-246 (E.D. Tex. May 9, 2011), D.E. 7. 

7. Order, id. (May 18, 2011), D.E. 9; Notice, id. (May 16, 2011), D.E. 8.
|  |
|--|
|  |

| MCD
  | Antifriction Bearings (MA35Q)**NOTE: ASCII text files are       replaced with Portable Data Format (PDF) files. Worksheet files are available       only in the WK3 format. Please direct any questions and/or comments by e-mail       to our Information Services Center.**********Frequency: Annual  Contact: Dana Brooks,       301-457-4797 **PDF FORMAT** Years available |        1999 |        1998 |        1997 | **TEXT FILE FOR VIEWING (ASCll       text)** Years available |        1997 |        1996 |        1995 |        1994 |        1993 |        1992 |**WORKSHEET FILES ('WK1' format)** Years available |        1997 |        1996 |        1995 |        1994 |        1993 |**WORKSHEET FILES ("WK3" format)** Years available |        1999 |        1998 |        1997 |*******Data are available before       1992. Send your request by e-mail       or call the Information Services Center at (301) 457-4673, or fax (301)       457-4632.*****Go back to list of Current Industrial Reports**
Census 2000 |  Subjects A to Z  |  Search |  Product Catalog  |  Data Access Tools |  FOIA   |  Privacy · Policies |  Contact Us |  Home
Last revised:Wednesday, 06-Sep-00 15:19:09 

  |
|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23 - 0307 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT MICHAEL ZERMENO,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including October 6, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 30 2023

08/30/2023
Case Number: DA 23-0307
No. 57265.

protest 79136-K (New York).

#### Lulis Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists-of figures composed of synthetic resin articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstracts 51959 and 51306. The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HORIZON MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC. FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       2,166,079
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,687,304
<ALLOWANCES>                                   999,735
<INVENTORY>                                 18,630,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,816,275
<PP&E>                                       5,365,495
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,832,679
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,137,921
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,678,808
<BONDS>                                     40,254,723
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,366
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,131,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,137,921
<SALES>                                     17,099,203
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,099,203
<CGS>                                       11,060,598
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,060,598
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,676,760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,170,931
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                236,821
<INCOME-TAX>                                   153,730
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             83,091
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    83,091
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01


</TABLE>
staf-ex101_14.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

 

 

 

As of October 3, 2016

 

Re:  Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc.

 

Reference is made to that certain 8% Senior Secured Convertible Debenture (the “Debenture”) due April 1, 2017 with an original issue date of July 8, 2015 made by Staffing 360 Solutions, Inc. (“Staffing”) in favor of Hillair Capital Investments L.P. or its registered assigns (collectively, “Hillair”) in the original principal amount of $3,920,000.  Any terms not otherwise defined in this letter agreement (this “Agreement”) shall have the meanings set forth under the Debenture.

 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in the Debenture, Hillair and Staffing hereby agree that: 

 


	
 
	
(1)
	
effective as of October 3, 2016, Hillair shall convert an aggregate amount of $980,000.00 of indebtedness under the Debenture (the “Conversion Amount”), currently due October 3, 2016, into 890,910 shares of Common Stock of Staffing (the “Conversion Shares”), and




 


	
 
	
(2)
	
upon receipt of the Conversion Shares as set forth hereunder, the aggregate principal amount of the Debenture, and the next Periodic Redemption Amount, shall be reduced by the Conversion Amount (as set forth on the books and records of Staffing).




 

The parties agree that the total cumulative amount of shares issued to Hillair may not exceed the requirements of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d).  Staffing represents and warrants that the conversion of the indebtedness under the Debenture into Conversion Shares pursuant to this Agreement is exempt from registration pursuant to Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.

 

Delivery of the Conversion Shares shall be otherwise governed by Section 4 of the Debenture, including the timing of delivery and compensation and/or rescission rights for failure to deliver or delivery on a timely basis.  Except as otherwise provided herein, this agreement shall not modify or amend in any way the terms of the Debenture.  

 

Section 9(d) (Governing Law) of the Debenture is hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

 

HILLAIR CAPITAL INVESTMENTS L.P.STAFFING 360 SOLUTIONS, INC.


 

/s/ Sean M. McAvoy/s/ Brendan Flood

By:Sean M. McAvoyBy: Brendan Flood

Title:Managing MemberTitle: Executive Chairman 

Hillair Capital Advisors LLC
#### THORSON, INC., a Minnesota corporation, Appellee, v. FIRST COMMUNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a New York corporation, Appellant.

No. 00-3500.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.

Filed June 25, 2001.

*441Before BOWMAN and HEANEY, Circuit Judges, and KOPF,1 District Judge.

1

. The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

Thorson, Inc. sued First Community Insurance Company (FCIC) on a public contractor’s payment bond furnished by FCIC. This is a case that is in federal court because of our jurisdiction in cases in which the plaintiff is a citizen of one state and the defendant a citizen of another. The outcome is governed by the substantive law of Minnesota.

Thorson commenced its action within the limitation period provided in the bond, but not within the statutory limitation period provided in Minn.Stat. § 574.31 (1998). The District Court2 denied FCIC’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that Minn.Stat. § 574.26 (1998) does not preclude parties from providing a longer limitation period in their bond than that provided by the statute, that the limitation period provided in the bond governs the question whether Thorson’s lawsuit was timely filed, and, applying that limitation period to the undisputed facts, that the lawsuit was timely. The parties having agreed that Thorson was entitled to summary judgment if its lawsuit was timely, the court granted Thorson’s motion for summary judgment. In addition to entering judgment for Thorson on the bond, the District Court awarded Thorson attorney fees and costs pursuant to Minn.Stat. § 574.26 subd. 2.

FCIC appeals. Responding to the issues FCIC raises, we first hold that the District Court did not err as a matter of law by finding that the savings clause in the bond did not incorporate the relevant statute to supersede the longer period of limitation provided in the bond. Having reviewed the matter de novo, we are satisfied the District Court correctly read *Nelson Roofing & Contracting, Inc. v. C.W. Moore Co.,*310 Minn. 140, 245 N.W.2d 866 (Minn.1976), and properly interpreted Minnesota law. As to attorney feés and costs, we believe the amounts awarded Thorson are not excessive, especially in view of the success achieved by Thorson’s attorneys. In short, we discern no abuse of the District Court’s broad discretion in its determination of the quantum of attorney fees and costs to be awarded.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. *See*8th Cir. R. 47B.

2

. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.
EXHIBIT 99.2

Date:   May 20, 2003

         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report FrontLine Capital Group (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and exchange commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I James D. Burnham,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
    the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
    as of September 30, 2002 (the last date of the period covered by the
    Report).



                     By: \s\ James D. Burnham
                         ----------------------
                         James D. Burnham, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                         (Chief Accounting Officer)
No. 48472.

#### Protests 52527-K, etc., of Jordan Marsh Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DR. CHRIS THOMPSON, DC, PA, a/a/o KIMBERLY KRAM,

Appellant,

v.

SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3018

[January 19, 2022]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the County Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Terri-Ann Miller, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

COSO-21-004908.

Chad A. Barr of Chad Barr Law, Altamonte Springs, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The county court sua sponte transferred venue without any showing 

that plaintiff’s chosen venue was improper or that transfer was appropriate 

on forum non conveniens grounds. We issued an order directing Appellee 

to show cause why this case is not controlled by Advanced Diagnostic 

Group v. Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Co., 321 So. 3d 772, 773-74

(Fla. 4th DCA 2021), where this Court recently reversed a group of similar 

orders. Appellee did not respond. 

Accordingly, we reverse the order transferring venue and remand for 

further proceedings. 

Reversed and remanded.

CIKLIN, FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, David M. Meadows, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 10, 2006



/s/ David M. MeadowsDavid M. MeadowsActing President(Principal Executive Officer)
Swanson, Brian (OST) · 

Ft:om: . .; 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Thursday, August 16, 2012 10:07 AM 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

FW: Sky West proposal to service Rhinelander, Wisconsin (RHI) 

From: Denny Erardi [mailto:dcerardi@comcast.net] 

Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:28AM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: Sky West proposal to service Rhinelander, Wisconsin (RHI) 

Dear Mr. Devany, 

I would like to communicate my support for awarding an EAS contract to Delta Airlines/Sky West to provide service 

Rhinelander, Wisconsin ("RHI"). 

I've been traveling to northern Wisconsin from San Francisco for 7 years, and it's been something of a grind, with the 

changing airlines, and the uncertainty regarding who would be flying at any given time. Delta/Sky West provides the best 

option from the traveller's standpoint. ~ ' 

Thank you for listening, 

Ms. Denny Clarke Erardi 

1
No. 46681.

#### Protests 835312-G, etc., of Lenci Import, Ltd. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of bodies, hoods, and forms or shapes, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314). The protests were therefore sustained.