Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 27, 2007 / Notices 8793 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Importer of Controlled Substances; 

Notice of Application 

Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 958(i), the 

Attorney General shall, prior to issuing 

a registration under this Section to a 

bulk manufacturer of a controlled 

substance in schedule I or II and prior 

to issuing a regulation under 21 U.S.C. 

952(a) authorizing the importation of 

such a substance, provide 

manufacturers holding registrations for 

the bulk manufacture of the substance 

an opportunity for a hearing. 

Therefore, in accordance with 21 CFR 

1301.34(a), this is notice that on January 

9, 2007, Sigma Aldrich Manufacturing 

LLC., Subsidiary of Sigma-Aldrich 

Company, 3500 Dekalb Street, St. Louis, 

Missouri 63118, made application by 

renewal to the Drug Enforcement 

Administration (DEA) to be registered as 

an importer of the basic classes of 

controlled substances listed in schedule 

I and II: 

Drug Schedule 

Cathinone (1235) .......................... I 

Methcathinone (1237) ................... I 

Aminorex (1585) ........................... I 

Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid 

(2010) ........................................ I 

Methaqualone (2565) ................... I 

Ibogaine (7260) ............................ I 

Lysergic acid diethylamide (7315) I 

Marihuana (7360) ......................... I 

Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370) ...... I 

Mescaline (7381) .......................... I 

4-Bromo-2,5- 

dimethoxyamphetamine (7391) I 

4-Bromo-2,5- 

dimethoxyphenethylamine 

(7392) ........................................ I 

4-Methyl-2,5- 

dimethoxyamphetamine (7395) I 

2,5-Dimethoxyamphetamine 

(7396) ........................................ I 

3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine 

(7400) ........................................ I 

N-Hydroxy-3,4- 

methylenedioxyamphetamine 

(7402) ........................................ I 

3,4-Methylenedioxy-Nethylamphetamine (7404) ......... I 

3,4- 

Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) (7405) ................... I 

4-Methoxyamphetamine (7411) .... I 

Bufotenine (7433) ......................... I 

Diethyltryptamine (7434) .............. I 

Dimethyltryptamine (7435) ........... I 

Psilocybin (7437) .......................... I 

Psilocyn (7438) ............................. I 

N-Ethyl-1-phenylcyclohexylamine 

(7455) ........................................ I 

N-Benzylpiperazine (BZP) (7493) I 

Trifluoromethylphenyl Piperazine 

(7494) ........................................ I 

Heroin (9200) ................................ I 

Drug Schedule 

Normorphine (9313) ..................... I 

Etonitazene (9624) ....................... I 

Amphetamine (1100) .................... II 

Methamphetamine (1105) ............ II 

Methylphenidate (1724) ................ II 

Amobarbital (2125) ....................... II 

Pentobarbital (2270) ..................... II 

Secobarbital (2315) ...................... II 

Glutethimide (2550) ...................... II 

Nabilone (7379) ............................ II 

Phencyclidine (7471) .................... II 

Cocaine (9041) ............................. II 

Codeine (9050) ............................. II 

Diprenorphine (9058) .................... II 

Oxycodone (9143) ........................ II 

Hydromorphone (9150) ................ II 

Diphenoxylate (9170) ................... II 

Ecgonine (9180) ........................... II 

Ethylmorphine (9190) ................... II 

Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... II 

Levorphanol (9220) ...................... II 

Meperidine (9230) ........................ II 

Methadone (9250) ........................ II 

Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (nondosage forms) (9273) ............... II 

Morphine (9300) ........................... II 

Thebaine (9333) ........................... II 

Opium powdered (9639) ............... II 

Oxymorphone (9652) .................... II 

Fentanyl (9801) ............................ II 

The company plans to import the 

listed controlled substances for sale to 

research facilities for drug testing and 

analysis. 

Any bulk manufacturer who is 

presently, or is applying to be, 

registered with DEA to manufacture 

such basic classes of controlled 

substances may file comments or 

objections to the issuance of the 

proposed registration and may, at the 

same time, file a written request for a 

hearing on such application pursuant to 

21 CFR 1301.43 and in such form as 

prescribed by 21 CFR 1316.47. 

Any such written comments or 

objections being sent via regular mail 

should be addressed, in quintuplicate, 

to the Deputy Assistant Administrator, 

Office of Diversion Control, Drug 

Enforcement Administration, 

Washington, D.C. 20537, Attention: DEA 

Federal Register Representative/ODL; or 

any being sent via express mail should 

be sent to DEA Headquarters, Attention: 

DEA Federal Register Representative/ 

ODL, 2401 Jefferson-Davis Highway, 

Alexandria, Virginia 22301; and must be 

filed no later than March 29, 2007. 

This procedure is to be conducted 

simultaneously with and independent 

of the procedures described in 21 CFR 

1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f). As noted 

in a previous notice published in the 

Federal Register on September 23, 1975, 

(40 FR 43745–46), all applicants for 

registration to import a basic classes of 

any controlled substances listed in 

schedule I or II are, and will continue 

to be required to demonstrate to the 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office 

of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration, that the requirements 

for such registration pursuant to 21 

U.S.C. 958(a), 21 U.S.C. 823(a), and 21 

CFR 1301.34(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f) are 

satisfied. 

Dated: February 16, 2007. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. E7–3297 Filed 2–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–60,837] 

Bright Horizons/MSX/Norfolk 

Assembly Plant, a/k/a Ford Family 

Service & Learning Center, Norfolk, 

VA; Notice of Termination of 

Investigation 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, as amended, an 

investigation was initiated on January 

26, 2007, in response to a worker 

petition filed on behalf of workers at 

Bright Horizons/MSX/Norfolk Assembly 

Plant, Norfolk, Virginia. 

The petitioners have requested that 

the petition be withdrawn. 

Consequently, the investigation has 

been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of 

February, 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–3277 Filed 2–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Notice of Determinations Regarding 

Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In accordance with Section 223 of the 

Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 

U.S.C. 2273) the Department of Labor 

herein presents summaries of 

determinations regarding eligibility to 

apply for trade adjustment assistance for 

workers (TA–W) number and alternative 

trade adjustment assistance (ATAA) by 

(TA–W) number issued during the 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
8794 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 27, 2007 / Notices 

period of January 12 through January 16, 

2007. 

In order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for workers of 

a primary firm and a certification issued 

regarding eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(a) of the Act must be met. 

I. Section (a)(2)(A) all of the following 

must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. The sales or production, or both, of 

such firm or subdivision have decreased 

absolutely; and 

C. Increased imports of articles like or 

directly competitive with articles 

produced by such firm or subdivision 

have contributed importantly to such 

workers’ separation or threat of 

separation and to the decline in sales or 

production of such firm or subdivision; 

or 

II. Section (a)(2)(B) both of the 

following must be satisfied: 

A. A significant number or proportion 

of the workers in such workers’ firm, or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm, 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

B. There has been a shift in 

production by such workers’ firm or 

subdivision to a foreign country of 

articles like or directly competitive with 

articles which are produced by such 

firm or subdivision; and 

C. One of the following must be 

satisfied: 

1. The country to which the workers’

firm has shifted production of the 

articles is a party to a free trade 

agreement with the United States; 

2. The country to which the workers’

firm has shifted production of the 

articles to a beneficiary country under 

the Andean Trade Preference Act, 

African Growth and Opportunity Act, or 

the Caribbean Basin Economic Recovery 

Act; or 

3. There has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports of articles that are 

like or directly competitive with articles 

which are or were produced by such 

firm or subdivision. 

Also, in order for an affirmative 

determination to be made for 

secondarily affected workers of a firm 

and a certification issued regarding 

eligibility to apply for worker 

adjustment assistance, each of the group 

eligibility requirements of Section 

222(b) of the Act must be met. 

(1) Significant number or proportion 

of the workers in the workers’ firm or 

an appropriate subdivision of the firm 

have become totally or partially 

separated, or are threatened to become 

totally or partially separated; 

(2) The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is a supplier or downstream producer to 

a firm (or subdivision) that employed a 

group of workers who received a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

trade adjustment assistance benefits and 

such supply or production is related to 

the article that was the basis for such 

certification; and 

(3) Either—

(A) the workers’ firm is a supplier and 

the component parts it supplied for the 

firm (or subdivision) described in 

paragraph (2) accounted for at least 20 

percent of the production or sales of the 

workers’ firm; or 

(B) a loss or business by the workers’

firm with the firm (or subdivision) 

described in paragraph (2) contributed 

importantly to the workers’ separation 

or threat of separation. 

In order for the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance to issue a 

certification of eligibility to apply for 

Alternative Trade Adjustment 

Assistance (ATAA) for older workers, 

the group eligibility requirements of 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

must be met. 

1. Whether a significant number of 

workers in the workers’ firm are 50 

years of age or older. 

2. Whether the workers in the 

workers’ firm possess skills that are not 

easily transferable. 

3. The competitive conditions within 

the workers’ industry (i.e., conditions 

within the industry are adverse). 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–60,557; Burley Design, LLC, 

Bicycles, Eugene, OR: December 6, 

2005. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) of the 

Trade Act have been met. 

TA–W–60,909; Kree Technologies USA, 

Plattsburgh, NY: February 5, 2006. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

of the Trade Act have been met. 

None. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

None. 

Affirmative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The date following the company 

name and location of each 

determination references the impact 

date for all workers of such 

determination. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(A) (increased imports) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–60,755; Illinois Tool Workers 

(ITW) Paslode, Nail Unit, Portage, 

WI: January 11, 2006. 

TA–W–60,762; Specialty Filaments, Inc., 

A Subsidiary of Capital Resource 

Partners, Middlebury, VT: January 

11, 2006. 

TA–W–60,773; Klaussner Furniture 

Industries, Inc., Plant #3—220 

Business South, Asheboro, NC: 

January 16, 2006. 

TA–W–60,828; Stimson Lumber 

Company, Libby Fingerjoint Plant, 

Libby, MT: January 24, 2006. 

TA–W–60,672; Affordable Upholstery 

LLC, Maynardville, TN: December 

24, 2005. 

TA–W–60,709; Carauster Custom 

Packaging Group, Inc., Austell, GA: 

December 20, 2005. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(a)(2)(B) (shift in production) and 

Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act 

have been met. 

TA–W–60,557C; Burley Design, LLC, 

Sewn Products, Eugene, OR: 

December 6, 2005. 

TA–W–60,819; Enhanced 

Manufacturing Solutions, Formerly 

Known as Viking New Castle, LLC, 

New Castle, IN: January 15, 2006. 

TA–W–60,820; Spencerville Metal 

Systems, Formerly Trim Trends Co 

Ohio, Inc., Spencerville, OH: 

January 9, 2006. 

TA–W–60,861; Elastic Corporation of 

America, Inc., Columbiana, AL: 

August 20, 2006. 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 38 / Tuesday, February 27, 2007 / Notices 8795 

TA–W–60,896; Merck and Company, 

Flint River Plant, Albany, GA: 

February 1, 2006. 

TA–W–60,915; Hanes Menswear, Hanes 

Menswear—Ponce Division, Ponce, 

PR: January 29, 2006. 

TA–W–60,699; Filtronic Comtek, Inc., 

Salisbury, MD: January 3, 2006. 

TA–W–60,927; IMI Cornelius, Inc., 

Mason City, IA: February 7, 2006. 

TA–W–60,932; North Star Yachts, LLC, 

North Sea Yachts, Express 

Personnel Service, Anderson, 

Kalama, WA: February 6, 2006. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (supplier to a firm whose workers 

are certified eligible to apply for TAA) 

and Section 246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade 

Act have been met. 

TA–W–60,556; Hitachi Electronic 

Devices (USA), Inc., Action Staffing, 

Greenville, SC: November 25, 2006. 

The following certifications have been 

issued. The requirements of Section 

222(b) (downstream producer for a firm 

whose workers are certified eligible to 

apply for TAA based on increased 

imports from or a shift in production to 

Mexico or Canada) and Section 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) of the Trade Act have 

been met. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, it has been 

determined that the requirements of 

246(a)(3)(A)(ii) have not been met for 

the reasons specified. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (1) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm are 50 years of 

age or older. 

TA–W–60,557; Burley Design, LLC, 

Bicycles, Eugene, OR: December 6, 

2005. 

TA–W–60,909; Kree Technologies USA, 

Plattsburgh, NY: February 5, 2006. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (2) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Workers at the firm possess skills 

that are easily transferable. 

None. 

The Department has determined that 

criterion (3) of Section 246 has not been 

met. Competition conditions within the 

workers’ industry are not adverse. 

None. 

Negative Determinations for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

In the following cases, the 

investigation revealed that the eligibility 

criteria for worker adjustment assistance 

have not been met for the reasons 

specified. 

Because the workers of the firm are 

not eligible to apply for TAA, the 

workers cannot be certified eligible for 

ATAA. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.A.) and (a)(2)(B)(II.A.) 

(employment decline) have not been 

met. 

TA–W–60,557A; Burley Design, LLC, 

Bicycle Trailers, Eugene, OR. 

TA–W–60,557B; Burley Design, LLC, Jog 

Strollers, Eugene, OR. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.B.) (Sales or 

production, or both, did not decline) 

and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in production 

to a foreign country) have not been met. 

TA–W–60,822; Shiloh Industries, 

Parma, OH. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria (a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased 

imports) and (a)(2)(B)(II.B.) (shift in 

production to a foreign country) have 

not been met. 

TA–W–60,715; Conair Group, Inc. (The), 

International Plastics Equipment 

Group, Inc., Franklin, PA. 

TA–W–60,740; Classic Picture 

Company, Inc., Dallas, TX. 

TA–W–60,393; R R Donnelley Premedia 

Technologies, Warsaw Premedia 

Center, Warsaw, IN. 

TA–W–60,760; Ahlstrom Corp., LLC, Mt. 

Holly Springs, PA. 

The investigation revealed that the 

predominate cause of worker 

separations is unrelated to criteria 

(a)(2)(A)(I.C.) (increased imports) and 

(a)(2)(B)(II.C) (shift in production to a 

foreign country under a free trade 

agreement or a beneficiary country 

under a preferential trade agreement, or 

there has been or is likely to be an 

increase in imports). 

None. 

The workers’ firm does not produce 

an article as required for certification 

under Section 222 of the Trade Act of 

1974. 

TA–W–60,753; Cerf Brothers Bag 

Company, Earth City, MO. 

TA–W–60,920; Allied Systems, Ltd., 

Chesapeake, VA. 

TA–W–60,938; Plastron Industries, 

Bensenville, IL. 

The investigation revealed that 

criteria of Section 222(b)(2) has not been 

met. The workers’ firm (or subdivision) 

is not a supplier to or a downstream 

producer for a firm whose workers were 

certified eligible to apply for TAA. 

None. 

I hereby certify that the 

aforementioned determinations were 

issued during the period of January 12 

through January 16, 2007. Copies of 

these determinations are available for 

inspection in Room C–5311, U.S. 

Department of Labor, 200 Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210 

during normal business hours or will be 

mailed to persons who write to the 

above address. 

Dated: February 21, 2007. 

Ralph DiBattista, 

Director, Division of Trade Adjustment 

Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–3275 Filed 2–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–60,786] 

Hanes Brands, Inc., a/k/a Hanes 

Menswear, Ponce, PR; Notice of 

Termination of Investigation 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade 

Act of 1974, an investigation was 

initiated on January 18, 2007 in 

response to a worker petition filed by a 

company official on behalf of workers at 

Hanes Menswear, a/k/a Hanes Brands, 

Inc., Ponce, Puerto Rico. 

The petitioning group of workers is 

covered by an active certification, (TA–

W–60,915), which expires on February 

13, 2009. Consequently, further 

investigation in this case would serve 

no purpose, and the investigation has 

been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of 

February, 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance. 

[FR Doc. E7–3276 Filed 2–26–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

Investigations Regarding Certifications 

of Eligibility To Apply for Worker 

Adjustment Assistance and Alternative 

Trade Adjustment Assistance 

Petitions have been filed with the 

Secretary of Labor under Section 221(a) 

of the Trade Act of 1974 (‘‘the Act’’) and 

are identified in the Appendix to this 

notice. Upon receipt of these petitions, 

the Director of the Division of Trade 

Adjustment Assistance, Employment 

and Training Administration, has 

instituted investigations pursuant to 

Section 221(a) of the Act. 

The purpose of each of the 

investigations is to determine whether 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC62 with NOTICES