alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>   THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM(ISOMET CORPORATION'S FORM 10-K FOR THE PERIOD ENDED 12/31/95) AND IS 
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1995  
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1995  
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             85
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     832
<ALLOWANCES>                                        1
<INVENTORY>                                     3,249
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                4,559  
<PP&E>                                          2,495  
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,121  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             964
<BONDS>                                             0
<COMMON>                                        1,906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<OTHER-SE>                                        995
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,991
<SALES>                                         4,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                4,800
<CGS>                                           3,261
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   4,896
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    1
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                198 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (97)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (53)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (44)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0  
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (44)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0428 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. TONY RAY MANYGUNS,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including November 20 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 13 2023

10/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0428
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1778 Prepped byOllie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 203 ) 11-1-3

6 Docket Number: 

# A-90-0 6

Printed 10/28/20089:51:01 AM Sheet 203 of 276P. 2 h*<iL'i S*ie»f J- he-si/ Sc-it;- flu.

Tabl e 4 POTOMA C RIVE R UNI T1 LIF E EXTENSIO N - BENEFITS/COST S A . SPEN TTO DAT E $2,350,00 0 PRESEN TVALU E O F BENEFIT S PROJECTE D (I N ADDITIO N T O INVESTMEN TTA X CREDI TAN D DEPRECIATION. ) 1 . REPLACEMEN TPOWE R COSTS DU E T O IMPROVE D AVAILABILIT Y 2 . HEA TRAT E IMPROVEMEN T 3 . REDUCE D MAINTENANC E COSTS 4 . REGAINE D CAPABILIT Y TOTA L TH E BOTTO M LIN E I S SMILING : $5,371,00 0 $1,122,00 0 $ 243,00 0 $7,396,00 0 $14,132,00 0 BENEFIT/COS T= 6.3 3 

### II-I-3 6

Table s TYPE S O F UNIT S STUDIE D N . INDIAN A (MITCHEL L STATIO N NO . 4 ) CINCINNAT I G& E (W C BECKJOR D NO . 3 ) DUK E POWE R (DA N RIVE R NO . 2 ) BOSTO N EDISO N (MYSTI C NO . 6 ) 195 6 185 0 psi g 19 5 18 0 19 5 12 5 $140/kw 4 Opsi g $100/kw 0 Opsi g 19 6 194 1 Opsi g $175/kw 12 5 M

WP F 1005/100 5 ° F ^20-3 0 YEAR S L E 12 8 MWP F 1000/100 0 ° F » - 2 5 YEAR S L E 7 0 MWP F 95 0 ° F 2 0 YEAR S L E 15 6 MWNO . 6 OI L 1000/100 0 <>

F ^ 1 5 YEAR S L E



## 1 6
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 12

- 00346

- CV

IN RE MATTHEW JAMES

LEACHMAN RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ o f mandamus and is of

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied. Nothing in this opinion shall be construed as a ruling on

the trial court’s failure to rule on the merits of “Relator’s Verifie d Petition To Take

Deposition Before Suit,” which remains pending in the trial court until ruled on by

that court.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

LIVINGSTON, C.J. would request a response.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).2

DELIVERED: August 23, 2012
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 10/15/2023 1

Electronic Ballot-Petition Signatures 

in Rhode Island During a Pandemic 

Acosta v. Restrepo (Mary S. McElroy, D.R.I. 1:20-cv-262) 

Because of the global Covid-19 infectious pandemic, a district judge 

in Rhode Island ordered election officials to accept ballot-petition 

signatures electronically. 

Subject: Getting on the ballot. Topics: Getting on the ballot; 

Covid-19. 

Six prospective candidates for Rhode Island’s senate filed a federal complaint 

against election officials for Rhode Island and five of its municipalities on 

Tuesday, June 16, 2020, challenging Rhode Island’s requirement of collecting 

ballot-petition signatures in person during a narrow time window between 

June 30 and July 10, made difficult by the social distancing that became necessary during the global Covid-19 infectious pandemic.1

 With their complaint, 

the plaintiffs filed an emergency motion for injunctive relief and expedited 

consideration.2

Judge Mary S. McElroy set the case for a remote chambers videoconference 

on Friday at 3:00 p.m.3

 She set the conference for late in the day so that the 

parties had the morning to get organized.4

 She then set the case for a 3:30 p.m. 

hearing by videoconference on June 23, and then she set the case for another 

videoconference at noon on June 25.5

On June 25, Judge McElroy issued a preliminary injunction requiring 

Rhode Island’s election authorities to accept for the November election ballotpetition signatures collected electronically.6

 “Because of the pandemic, and the 

effect the in-person signature requirement will have on ballot access, the current signature process is not narrowly tailored to advance the state’s interests.”7

The parties stipulated dismissal of the action in September 2021.8

1. Complaint, Acosta v. Restrepo, No. 1:20-cv-262 (D.R.I. June 16, 2020), D.E. 1; Acosta v. 

Restrepo, 470 F. Supp. 3d 161, 163–65 (D.R.I. 2020); see Katherine Gregg, ACLU Sues to Suspend Signature Requirement for R.I. Ballot Access, Providence J., June 18, 2020, at A5. 

2. Motion, Acosta, No. 1:20-cv-262 (D.R.I. June 16, 2020), D.E. 2; Acosta, 470 F. Supp. 3d 

at 165. 

3. Docket Sheet, Acosta, No. 1:20-cv-262 (D.R.I. June 16, 2020). 

For this report, Tim Reagan interviewed Judge McElroy and her law clerk Kevin Rolando 

by telephone on September 4, 2020. 

4. Interview with Judge Mary S. McElroy and her law clerk Kevin Rolando, Sept. 4, 2020. 

5. Docket Sheet, supra note 3. 

6. Acosta, 470 F. Supp. 3d 161; see Katherine Gregg, Judge: Signatures Not Worth It in Virus 

Age, Providence J., June 24, 2020, at A4. 

7. Acosta, 470 F. Supp. 3d at 167. 

8. Docket Sheet, supra note 3 (order granting stipulated dismissal, Sept. 1, 2021); Stipulation, Acosta, No. 1:20-cv-262 (D.R.I. Sept. 1, 2021), D.E. 54.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force. 

# ACTION:

Record of Decision. 

# SUMMARY:

On February 13, 2007, the United States Air Force signed the ROD for the New Mexico Training Range Initiative, Cannon Air Force Base, New Mexico. The ROD states the Air Force decision to implement Alternative A (Preferred Alternative) that will expand the size, operational altitudes and usefulness of the Pecos Military Operations Area and Associated Air Traffic Controlled Assigned Airspace. 

                        The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), inputs from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made available on October 20, 2006 in                               ( print page 8974)                            the                         **Federal Register**                         (Volume 71, Number 203, Pages 61967-61968) with a wait period ending November 20, 2006. The ROD documents only the decision of the Air Force with respect to the proposed Air Force actions analyzed in the Final EIS.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sheryl K. Parker, Headquarters Air Combat Command, Integrated Planning Office, 129 Andrews St, Suite 102 Langley AFB VA 23655 or call (757) 764-9334. 

Bao-Anh Trinh, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

 [FR Doc. E7-3467 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
FacilityID SourceID LocationType Longitude Latitude UTMzone

1607_10 16070301L -76.17621 43.061582 1607_37 16070301L -84.17 39.81SourceType Lengthx Lengthy Angle HorzDim VertDim

P 0 0 0 P 0 0 0AreaVolReleaseHgt StackHgt_m StackDiameter_m ExitGasVel_m ExitGasTemp_K Elevation_m 0 5.181599992 1.219199998 8.839199987 299.814 0 5.181599992 1.219199998 8.839199987 299.814HillHeight
##### 



Exhibit 11.1
 
 Year Ended December 31,
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005Basic earnings per share calculation:Average number of shares outstanding
    
    
    29,347
    
    
    
    29,501
    
    
    
    28,518Net (loss) income from continuing operations
    
    $
    (14,387
    )
    
    $
    37,401
    
    
    $
    36,247Payment of preferred dividends
    
    
    (1,335
    )Net loss from continuing operations, adjusted
    
    $
    (15,722
    )Basic earnings per share from continuing
operations
    
    $
    (0.54
    )
    
    $
    1.27
    
    
    $
    1.27Net (loss) income from all operations
    
    $
    (44,930
    )
    
    $
    1,727
    
    
    $
    18,987Payment of preferred dividends
    
    
    (1,335
    )Net loss from all operations, adjusted
    
    $
    (46,265
    )Basic earnings per share from all operations
    
    $
    (1.58
    )
    
    $
    0.06
    
    
    $
    0.67Diluted earnings per share calculation:Diluted shares outstandingAverage number of shares outstanding
    
    
    29,347
    
    
    
    29,501
    
    
    
    28,518Assumed exercise of stock options(1)
    
    
    6
    
    
    
    189
    
    
    
    323Total shares
    
    
    29,353
    
    
    
    29,690
    
    
    
    28,841Net (loss) income from continuing operations,
adjusted
    
    $
    (15,722
    )
    
    $
    37,401
    
    
    $
    36,247Effect of stock options
    
    
    (1,019
    )
    
    
    (303
    )
    
    
    Net (loss) income from continuing operations
    
    $
    (16,741
    )
    
    $
    37,098
    
    
    $
    36,247Diluted earnings per share from continuing
operations
    
    $
    (0.57
    )
    
    $
    1.25
    
    
    $
    1.26Net (loss) income from all operations, adjusted
    
    $
    (46,265
    )
    
    $
    1,727
    
    
    $
    18,987Effect of stock options
    
    
    (1,019
    )
    
    
    (303
    )
    
    
    Net (loss) income from all operations
    
    $
    (47,284
    )
    
    $
    1,424
    
    
    $
    18,987Diluted earnings per share from all operations
    
    $
    (1.61
    )
    
    $
    0.05
    
    
    $
    0.66
 
 (1)
    
    The dilutive effect of stock options is based on the Treasury Stock method.
p.1 

OAR Box 1875 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

22) ll-E-40 

Docket Number: 

A-90-19 

Printed 12/1/200811:12:45 AM Sheet 22 of 86 
P.2 

A-90-19 

ll-E-40 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards •jaKu ) a. Willi e ui ni l <t_uaiuy i laniiui y au u oianuaiu s 

i ^.I/JL " Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 7<' r ft \\ ' 

:l' • DEC 1B199Z 

'"<< PRO^° 

April 13, 1992 

MEMORANDUM TO THE DOCKET 1 « .^^-

SUBJECT: Meeting with American Petroleum Institute to discuss 

the Source Category List 

FROM: David J. Svendsgaard __ 

Chemicals and Petroleiim'feranchY/fiSD 

The purpose of this memorandum is to memorialize for Docket 

Number A-90-49 that a meeting occurred November 8, 1991 between 

representatives of EPA and the American Petroleum Institute 

(API). The attendees are listed below. 

The topics discussed were: 

- general overview of the industries represented by API 

- Clean Air Act exemption for individual oil well heads 

[§112(n)(4)(a)] 

- disaggregation of Petroleum Refineries 

- Hazardous Organic NESHAP applicability 

- emissions averaging 

- future interaction with the industry on regulations 

and permits 

EPA concluded the meeting by providing the current status of 

the source category list project, including the anticipated 

timeframe for final publication. 

ATTENDEES: 

Chuck French, EPA/PAB 

Dan Gealy, Arco 

Steve Shedd, EPA/CPB 

Bob Strieter, API 

David Svendsgaard, EPA/CPB 

Susan Wyatt, EPA/CPB
No. 52960.

#### Bohemian Distributing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 997877-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
EXHIBIT 32.1


Date:   August 19, 2003

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of FrontLine Capital Group (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott
H. Rechler, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company as of June 30, 2003 (the last date of the period covered by
         the Report).

                  By:    \s\ Scott H. Rechler
                         ----------------------------------
                         Scott H. Rechler, President and Chief Executive Officer
                         (Principal Executive Officer)

                                       52
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  INCLUDED IN THE  QUARTERLY  REPORT ON
FORM  10-QSB  FOR  THE  QUARTERLY  PERIOD  ENDED  JUNE  30,  2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      32,429
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              993,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                97,887
<INVENTORY>                                820,754
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         1,794,645
<PP&E>                                     477,919
<DEPRECIATION>                             280,744
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           2,286,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   11,177,773
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                    226
<COMMON>                                    13,159
<OTHER-SE>                               1,105,140
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             2,286,298
<SALES>                                  2,059,425
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         2,059,425
<CGS>                                    1,007,082
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            1,007,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            62,829
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,088
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (95,928)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (95,928)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (95,928)
<EPS-BASIC>                                (.010)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.010)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
32
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Vitasti, Inc.  (the “Company”) on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tammy-Lynn McNabb,
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: August
23, 2005
 By: /s/
TAMMY-LYNN MCNABB
 
 Name:
Tammy-Lynn McNabb
 Title:
  Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>





                         NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   Exhibit 24
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


     Each person whose signature appears below does hereby make,  constitute and
appoint John J.  Bongiorno,  Phyllis E. Cochran and William W. Jones and each of
them  acting  individually,  true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact  and agents with
power to act without the other and with full power of substitution,  to execute,
deliver and file, for and on such person's behalf, and in such person's name and
capacity or capacities as stated below, any amendment,  exhibit or supplement to
the Form 10-K Report making such changes in the report as such  attorney-in-fact
deems appropriate.

                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, this
report  has  been  signed  below  by the  following  persons  on  behalf  of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Signature                  Title                           Date
<S><C>                    <C>                                <C>
/s/JOHN J. BONGIORNO      President and Chief Executive      December 22, 1997
   John J. Bongiorno      Officer; Director
                          (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/R. WAYNE CAIN          Vice President and Treasurer;      December 22, 1997
   R. Wayne Cain          Director
                          (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/PHYLLIS E. COCHRAN     Vice President and Controller;     December 22, 1997
   Phyllis E. Cochran     Director
                          (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/JORDAN H. FEIGER       Vice President, Operations;        December 22, 1997
   Jordan H. Feiger       Director


/s/JOHN R. HORNE          Director                           December 22, 1997
   John R. Horne


/s/THOMAS M. HOUGH        Director                           December 22, 1997
   Thomas M. Hough
</TABLE>


<PAGE>





                         NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES


                             SIGNATURES (Continued)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
    Signature                 Title                             Date

<S><C>                      <C>                              <C>
/s/ROBERT C. LANNERT        Director                         December 22, 1997
   Robert C. Lannert


/s/J. STEVEN KEATE          Director                         December 22, 1997
   J. Steven Keate


/s/THOMAS D. SILVER         Director                         December 22, 1997
   Thomas D. Silver
</TABLE>
No. 47343.

Suit 4384.

#### United *States*v. *Central Vermont Railway, Inc.,*

C. D. 581. Appeal dismissed May 8,. 1942; not yet published..
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY ESKRIDGE, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0865 LKK GGH P

vs.

A. CORREA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has filed discovery documents. Plaintiff is informed that court

permission is not necessary for discovery requests and that neither discovery requests served on

an opposing party nor that party's responses should be filed until such time as a party becomes

dissatisfied with a response and seeks relief from the court pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. Discovery requests between the parties shall not be filed with the court unless, and

until, they are at issue. 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s December 30, 2005

discovery documents will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Plaintiff is cautioned that

further filing of discovery requests or responses, except as required by rule of court, may result in

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00865-LKK -GGH Document 45 Filed 02/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

an order of sanctions, including, but not limited to, a recommendation that this action be

dismissed. 

DATED: 2/1/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

eskr0865.411

 

Case 2:04-cv-00865-LKK -GGH Document 45 Filed 02/02/06 Page 2 of 2