December 2001

NASA/CR-2001-211257

An Updated Catalog of 521 Social Surveys

of Residents’ Reactions to Environmental

Noise (1943-2000)

James M. Fields

Wyle Laboratories, El Segundo, California
The NASA STI Program Office ... in Profile

Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to

the advancement of aeronautics and space

science. The NASA Scientific and Technical

Information (STI) Program Office plays a key

part in helping NASA maintain this important

role.

The NASA STI Program Office is operated by

Langley Research Center, the lead center for

NASA’s scientific and technical information. The

NASA STI Program Office provides access to the

NASA STI Database, the largest collection of

aeronautical and space science STI in the world.

The Program Office is also NASA’s institutional

mechanism for disseminating the results of its

research and development activities. These

results are published by NASA in the NASA STI

Report Series, which includes the following

report types:

• TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of

completed research or a major significant

phase of research that present the results of

NASA programs and include extensive

data or theoretical analysis. Includes

compilations of significant scientific and

technical data and information deemed to

be of continuing reference value. NASA

counterpart of peer-reviewed formal

professional papers, but having less

stringent limitations on manuscript length

and extent of graphic presentations.

• TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Scientific

and technical findings that are preliminary

or of specialized interest, e.g., quick release

reports, working papers, and

bibliographies that contain minimal

annotation. Does not contain extensive

analysis.

• CONTRACTOR REPORT. Scientific and

technical findings by NASA-sponsored

contractors and grantees.

• CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected

papers from scientific and technical

conferences, symposia, seminars, or other

meetings sponsored or co-sponsored by

NASA.

• SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific,

technical, or historical information from

NASA programs, projects, and missions,

often concerned with subjects having

substantial public interest.

• TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. Englishlanguage translations of foreign scientific

and technical material pertinent to NASA’s

mission.

Specialized services that complement the STI

Program Office’s diverse offerings include

creating custom thesauri, building customized

databases, organizing and publishing research

results ... even providing videos.

For more information about the NASA STI

Program Office, see the following:

• Access the NASA STI Program Home Page

at http://www.sti.nasa.gov

• E-mail your question via the Internet to

help@sti.nasa.gov

• Fax your question to the NASA STI Help

Desk at (301) 621-0134

• Phone the NASA STI Help Desk at

(301) 621-0390

• Write to:

 NASA STI Help Desk

 NASA Center for AeroSpace Information

 7121 Standard Drive

 Hanover, MD 21076-1320
National Aeronautics and

Space Administration

Langley Research Center Prepared for Langley Research Center

Hampton, Virginia 23681-2199 under Contract NAS1-20103

December 2001

NASA/CR-2001-211257

An Updated Catalog of 521 Social Surveys

of Residents’ Reactions to Environmental

Noise (1943-2000)

James M. Fields

Wyle Laboratories, El Segundo, California
Available from:

NASA Center for AeroSpace Information (CASI) National Technical Information Service (NTIS)

7121 Standard Drive 5285 Port Royal Road

Hanover, MD 21076-1320 Springfield, VA 22161-2171

(301) 621-0390 (703) 605-6000
TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY ............................................................... 1

INTRODUCTION .......................................................... 2

DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION IN CATALOG ................................ 3

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................... 5

SURVEY CATALOG ........................................................ 6

NOISE SOURCE INDEX .................................................... 75

CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX ................................................. 84

SERIAL NUMBER INDEX .................................................. 91

BIBLIOGRAPHY .......................................................... 97
-1-

SUMMARY

This report describes all social surveys of residents' reactions to environmental noise in residential

areas that have been located in English language publications from 1943 to December of 2000. A

total of 521 surveys are described. The surveys are indexed by country, noise source and date of

survey. The publications and reports from each survey are listed in a bibliography.
-2-

INTRODUCTION

Social surveys have been widely used since the early 1960's to assess the impact of environmental

noise in residential areas. These surveys have usually measured impact on each surveyed

individual (respondent) with some type of standardized questionnaire. These questionnaires have

usually been personally administered by an interviewer in the home. In most studies,

environmental noise levels have been either measured or estimated for each respondent's

residence.

The results from these surveys have not been utilized to their full potential. The large number of

surveys and publications may have contributed to their underutilization. Researchers find it

difficult to locate relevant publications and, once located, find it difficult to determine which

surveys are being referred to in the publications. This catalog of social surveys of environmental

noise contributes to a fuller utilization by identifying the surveys and their publications.

 This report attempts to identify all social surveys of residents' reactions to environmental noise in

residential areas that have been described in English language publications through December of

2000. A total of 521 surveys are described. The catalog was compiled with the goal of providing

readers with access to all English language information about residents' responses to

environmental noise. An attempt has been made to include both well-known and obscure

publications and reports. Foreign surveys are included even if the only English publication is an

English language translation of a foreign language report. Some surveys from English-speaking

countries have been included even though they have only appeared in unpublished reports. 

Despite the effort to be broadly inclusive some surveys from English-speaking countries are not

included that have only appeared in theses or in reports that could not be located. Surveys from

other countries have generally been excluded if they have not been described in an English

language publication. Some surveys that have been briefly mentioned in publications are not

included in the catalog if basic information about the sample size, study location or study design

has not been published. Other surveys have been included when direct communication with the

survey investigator could provide needed information.

A large number of published and unpublished sources were examined to identify surveys. Some

of the most important sources are the following: Journal of Sound and Vibration (Vol. 1-238),

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America (Vol. 1-108), Journal of the Acoustical Society of

Japan (English edition) (Vol. 1-21) Noise Control (All issues), Sound (All issues), Noise Control

Engineering (Vol. 1-48), Proceedings of International Commission on the Biological Effects of

Noise (ICBEN)(1973-1998), Inter-noise Proceedings (through 2000), Noise-con Proceedings

(through 2000), ICA Proceedings (through 1998) a Wyle report on social surveys (Wyle, 1977)

and three articles reviewing surveys (Schultz 1978; Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991; Miedema

and Vos 1998).

Although most surveys of reactions to noise in residential areas follow a common basic study

design, other studies in this catalog have also explored a wide range of alternative data collection
-3-

methods. The majority of the studies are based on either self-administered or intervieweradministered, structured questionnaires that ask about long-term reactions to relatively stable

noise environments. These studies obtain respondents' self-reported feelings about their noise

environments. Other surveys in the catalog, however, have used such diverse methods as

unstructured interviews, reports of behavioral changes, reports of disturbance during the

immediately preceding hours, paper diaries of perceptions of noise events, real-time instantaneous

responses recorded on computers, and mechanical monitoring of movements during sleep. Many

studies have examined reactions to changing noise environments. Some studies have been based

on longitudinal designs in which respondents are repeatedly interviewed.

The present catalog only concerns the residential environment. The catalog does not list the

lesser number of social surveys that have measured reactions to noise in other settings such as

recreational areas, school or places of work. 

This catalog replaces and expands upon the first edition of the catalog that was issued for 200

surveys through 1980 (Fields 1981) and the subsequent revision for 318 surveys through 1989

(Fields 1991). The surveys from those earlier editions also appear in this catalog of 521 surveys

although some of the information for the previous surveys, such as lists of publications, has been

updated. The large number of additions (200) between the 1989 and 2000 catalogs is partly

explained by the number of new surveys conducted in the 1990's. Other factors accounting for

the 200 additions are the identification of more pre-1989 surveys (especially from Japan), the

decision to include more studies with innovative data collection techniques for which the survey

was a peripheral activity, and an intensive effort to upgrade insufficient published information

through personal correspondence (usually via E-mail). This later effort resulted in the inclusion of

information in the survey descriptions that has not appeared in publications. 

The first section of this report consists of the descriptions of the 521 surveys. These descriptions

are ordered alphabetically by country. Later sections consist of indices in which the studies are

ordered by noise source, data of survey and survey identification number. The noise source index

also sorts the studies by country with the result that all the surveys within one country of a single

noise source are presented contiguously. A bibliography of all of the associated publications and

reports is provided.

Complete noise-reaction survey data sets are available for some surveys in various national and

international general social survey archives. The UK Data Archive (formerly ESRC Data

Archive) at the University of Essex in England has more than 25 community noise study data sets

(http://www.data-archive.ac.uk) . Researchers at TNO in the Netherlands (Miedema and Vos

1998) have acquired more than 50 data sets that measure residents' reactions to noise. 

DESCRIPTION OF INFORMATION IN CATALOG

Each survey's entry in the catalog consists of a basic description and a list of the survey's
-4-

publications and reports. Although each description is brief, it provides enough information to

positively identify the survey and the primary characteristics of the survey design. Although the

statements about findings are sometimes included under the "Notes" heading, this catalog does

not provide a systematic summary or review of study findings. Most studies have multiple

findings. Any summary of these findings would have involved arbitrary judgements and have

prohibitively increased the resources required for this catalog without relieving most readers of

the necessity of consulting study reports.

Each study's entry consists of the following nine items of information:

Survey Identification Number: Each entry begins with a two-part alphanumeric code. 

The first part is a three-letter abbreviation for the country. The second part is a serial number

from 001 to 521 that uniquely identifies the survey. (The initial three-letter country abbreviation

is attached as an aid to locate the survey within the catalog). 

Title: Each survey is identified with a unique, descriptive title. Any other widely used title

for the survey follows in parentheses or is given under "Notes." The terms "pilot" or

"preliminary" are used only when the authors used the terms. Some "pilot" surveys are larger

than other "main" surveys.

Date: The dates given are the years and, if known, months in which the social survey data

were obtained from respondents. If the date of a survey is unknown, then the date is the earliest

publication date and is listed as "Publication (Survey date not reported)." Associated noise

measurement programs, if any, may have been conducted during a different time period.

Source: The major sources of noise that are explored in the survey questionnaire are

listed. All surveys are listed by their major noise sources in the noise source index. The four

most often studied noise sources are aircraft, road traffic, railway, and community noise. Other

less frequently studied sources are grouped under the headings of sonic boom, impulsive noise,

interior noise, industrial noise, construction noise, and miscellaneous. The meaning of community

noise and the distinctions between road traffic and community noise are not always clear. The

"community" category is often not precisely defined and includes some studies that use a vague

phrase such as "noise in this neighborhood" without clearly specifying the source. Some

"community" studies have asked about each of a long list of noise sources without focusing either

acoustical noise measurements or the questionnaire on one or two sources. The publications

sometimes characterize a study as a "road traffic noise" study when road traffic is the dominant

noise source, but unattended acoustical measurements included all noise sources. Some such

"road traffic noise" studies are based on a noise annoyance question that only refers to noise in the

neighborhood generally.

Location: The country and city or airport where the survey was conducted are named. 

Most studies are confined to only a few, specially selected study areas within the city or airport. 

For studies with noise measurements such clustering of respondents reduces study costs. In a few
-5-

instances that are noted, a probability sample of an entire area has been studied. 

Sample size (N=): This is the number of questionnaires available for the survey analyses. 

This number does not always match the number found in specific publications that are based on

only subsets of the data sets. For studies in which some respondents were reinterviewed, the

number of respondents is reported separately. Sample size information is usually presented

separately for any supplementary studies of special groups (eg. complainants).

Noise data: A "Yes" indicates that acoustical information about the respondent's noise

exposure is available. The acoustical data may come from either noise measurements or some

type of noise exposure model that estimates exposure from information about the noise source. 

No attempt has been made to evaluate the quality of the noise exposure information because

published information is generally insufficient to evaluate the accuracy of the long-term average

noise exposure about which respondents have been asked. A few studies are classified as not

having noise data available even if both social survey and noise exposure data were collected but

the investigators did not coordinate either the data collection or analysis of the two types of data.

Reference: The authors and dates of all known reports and publications are listed for each

study. The complete reference for each publication is included in the bibliography section of this

report. The availability of English translations is noted in the bibliography. Preliminary reports

and short papers that appear in printed conference proceedings are included even though more

complete reports are also listed for the same study. Papers that are presented in conferences, but

not in published proceedings, are usually not listed. Publications that contain only secondary

analyses or references to previously published data are not usually included.

Notes: Information is presented about any unusual aspects of the survey. A comment is

included if the survey departs from the modal methodology in which the residents' opinions were

obtained at a single point in time through face-to-face interviews using a fixed-format,

interviewer-administered questionnaire. Any unusual aspects of the surveys are described. Close

linkages with other studies are noted. The study's purpose or at least one study finding is briefly

noted for most surveys.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

More than 90 researchers generously contributed to this catalog by providing publications and

study information that does not appear in widely-available English language publications. The

completeness of this catalog owes much to their assistance. Thanks are also offered to Barry

Reed who provided computer programming assistance at strategic points and to Helen Fields who

searched for studies and entered studies into the bibliography and catalog data bases.
-6-

SURVEY CATALOG

The surveys are ordered by the full six-character, alphanumeric identifier. As a result, surveys are

ordered alphabetically by country. Multinational surveys are reported separately for each country. 

As a result some surveys that are sometimes considered to have been a single-coordinated study

are listed as three separate surveys. The notes always identify such instances. The Scandinavian

aircraft noise study that was listed as single survey in previous editions of this catalog (SWE-035)

now appears as three surveys, one for each of the three participating countries (DEN-519, NOR520, SWE-035).

AUL-036 1969 Sydney Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1969

Source: Aircraft

Location: Australia: Sydney Airport

N=: 296 main sample (also sample of 20 complainants) 

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Mather 1971

Notes: The study includes an additional sample of 20

complainants.

AUL-209 1979 Hornsby Rifle Range Survey

Date: 1979 (November)

Source: Rifle range

Location: Australia: Hornsby (Suburb of Sydney)

N=: 201

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bullen and Hede 1982;Bullen and Hede

1983a;Hede and Bullen 1981;Hede and Bullen

1982b

Notes: Alternative noise indices for assessing residents'

responses to shooting ranges are evaluated.

AUL-210 1980 Australian Five-Airport Survey

Date: 1980 (February to August)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Australia: Five airports (Sydney, Adelaide, Perth,

Melbourne, Richmond Air base)

N=: 3,575

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bullen and Hede 1983a;Bullen and Hede

1983b;Bullen and Hede 1986;Bullen, Hede, and

Kyriacos 1986;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz

1991;Hede and Bullen 1982a

Notes: Noise indices are assessed. Personal,

demographic, and attitudinal factors that affect

annoyance are identified.

AUL-211 1979 Sydney Airport Study of Type of Noise

Reactions

Date: 1979 (June)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Australia: Sydney airport

N=: 100

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hede 1980;Hede, Bullen, and Rose 1979

Notes: Annoyance is the main component in reaction to

aircraft noise, but other reactions are also

important.

AUL-214 1978 Leichhardt Municipality Complaint

Comparison Survey

Date: 1978 (October, November)

Source: Community

Location: Australia: Leichhardt Municipality in Sydney

N=: 148

Noise data: No

Reference: Avery 1982

Notes: The sample survey data are compared with

telephone complaints from the same area. The

complaints underestimated the annoyance rates

and do not correctly rank order the annoyance from

different noise sources.

AUL-226 1974 Brisbane S-E Freeway Study

Date: 1974 (August, September)

Source: Expressway traffic

Location: Australia: Residents near a 2 km section of a

freeway

N=: 288

Noise data: Yes (for 142 respondents)

Reference: Brown 1980b;Brown and Law 1976;Brown and

Law 1978

Notes: Only a narrow range of low noise levels (52 to 65

dB(A) LAeq) are included.

AUL-227 1975-76 Australian Three-City Roadway Study
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-7-

Date: 1975 (October to December), 1976 (April, May)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Australia: 19 areas near roads in Brisbane, Sydney,

and Melbourne

N=: 818

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Brown 1978;Brown 1980a

Notes: None

AUL-244 1979 Sydney Airport Pilot Survey

Date: 1979

Source: Aircraft

Location: Australia: Sydney airport

N=: 160

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hede 1980

Notes: This was a pilot survey for the 1980 Australia

Five-Airport Survey (AUL-210).

AUL-247 Victoria Australia Entertainment Center Study

Date: 1984 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Entertainment noise

Location: Australia: Victoria (residents near hotels, large

music venues, restaurant, roller skating rink,

reception center, recording studio)

N=: 27

Noise data: Yes: inside and outside

Reference: Parris 1984

Notes: Residents also rated the noise during ten minutes

of their interviews.

AUL-248 1983 Melbourne Australia Simon and Garfunkel

Concert

Date: 1983 (February)

Source: Outdoor concert by Simon and Garfunkel

Location: Australia: Melbourne

N=: 442

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Parris 1984

Notes: Residents of the area were interviewed by

telephone in the three evenings following the

concert.

AUL-249 1983 Melbourne Australia David Bowie Concert

Date: 1983 (November)

Source: Outdoor concert by David Bowie

Location: Australia: Melbourne

N=: 402

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Parris 1984

Notes: Residents of the area were interviewed by

telephone in the three evenings following the

concert.

AUL-264 1980 Brisbane Traffic Noise Reduction Survey

Date: 1980 (November) to 1981 (April)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Australia: Three locations in Brisbane

N=: 152 (Most analyses exclude 11 new in-migrants.)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Brown, Hall, and Kyle-Little 1985

Notes: Residents who experience a reduction in noise

from a road bypass are compared to other residents

with similar noise exposures. This was part of a

broader study of all environmental forces

associated with living near a roadway. Part of each

questionnaire was interviewer-administered and

part was left for respondents to answer.

AUL-265 1980 Brisbane Traffic Noise Increase Survey

Date: 1980 (October), 1981 (May), 1982 (June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Australia: One roadway in Brisbane

N=: 20 (60 interviews)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Brown 1987

Notes: All 20 respondents were interviewed two weeks

before the traffic increased and at 7 and 19 months

after the increase.

AUL-285 1986 Australian National Noise Survey

Date: 1986 (February)

Source: Community

Location: Australia: National survey

N=: 2,332

Noise data: No

Reference: Australian Government Publishing Service 1988

Notes: The six noise questions in this general-purpose,

national omnibus survey found that noise is one of

the most serious pollution problems in residential

communities. Traffic noise and domestic noise are

the biggest problems.

AUL-286 1986 Brisbane Noise Survey

Date: 1986 (March to May)

Source: Community, Road traffic, Aircraft

Location: Australia: Brisbane (27 sites spread over 6 noise

area categories)

N=: 1,350

Noise data: No (Sites are classified by type of noise area using

density of transportation and extent of commerce

and industry.)

Reference: Duhs, Eddington, and Renew 1988

Notes: Road traffic noise is the most often mentioned

noise problem. The study is based on a probability

sample.

AUL-287 1986 Toowoomba Community Noise Survey
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-8-

Date: 1986 (May to December), 1987

Source: Community

Location: Australia: Toowoomba

N=: 600 (Approximate)

Noise data: No (Sites are classified by type of noise area using

density of transportation and extent of commerce

and industry.)

Reference: Eddington and Eddington 1988

Notes: Road traffic noise is the most annoying noise in all

types of noise areas.

AUL-306 1988 New South Wales Power Station Survey

Date: 1988 (Winter)

Source: Power station

Location: Australia: Two power station sites in New South

Wales

N=: 301 respondents in 12 areas

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Job and Hede 1989

Notes: The response to power plant noise was similar to

the response to aircraft noise at the same noise

level found in a previous survey (AUL-210).

AUL-307 1986 Sydney Aircraft/Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1986 (November, December), 1987 (January,

February)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: Australia: Sydney airport

N=: 426

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lawrence and Putra 1989;Putra 1990;Putra and

Lawrence 1991

Notes: Aircraft noise annoyance is affected by road traffic

noise levels. The data come from 314 mail

questionnaires and 112 face-to-face interviews.

AUL-321 1983 Sydney Artillery Range Survey

Date: 1983

Source: Artillery

Location: Australia: areas near Holsworthy Artillery Range

(Sydney)

N=: 1,626

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bullen, Hede, and Job 1991;Job, Bullen, and Hede

1991

Notes: Artillery noise is more annoying than intermittent,

non-impulsive noise of the same noise level.

AUL-332 1991 Brisbane Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1991

Source: Road traffic

Location: Australia: Brisbane

N=: 1,038

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Renew 1993;Renew 2000

Notes: The study was designed for comparison with

previous Australian road traffic noise studies.

AUL-383 1994-95 Sydney Airport Noise Change Survey

Date: 1994 - 1995 (Early 1994 for before-change survey. 

December 1994 - February 1995 for after-change

survey)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Australia: Sydney (4 areas near Kingsford Smith

airport)

N=: 1,332 (1,015 before the change , 97 repeated before

the change, 220 after the change).

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Carter, Job, Taylor, Peploe, and Morell

1996;Hatfield, Job, Carter, Peploe, Taylor, and

Morell 1998;Hatfield, Job, Carter, Peploe, Taylor,

and Morell 1999;Job, Topple, Carter, Peploe,

Taylor, and Morell 1996a;Job, Topple, Carter,

Peploe, Taylor, and Morell 1996b Hatfield, Job,

Carter, Peploe, Taylor, and Morell 2000;Job,

Cuthbert, and Hatfield 2000;Job, Hatfield, Carter,

Peploe, Taylor, and Morell 1998b;Job, Hatfield,

Carter, Peploe, Taylor, and Morell 1999a;Job,

Hatfield, Carter, Peploe, Taylor, and Morell

1999b;Job, Hatfield, Carter, Peploe, Taylor, and

Morell 2000a;Job, Hatfield, Carter, Peploe, Taylor,

and Morell 2000b;Job, Hatfield, Peploe, Carter,

Taylor, and Morell 1998a

Notes: Respondents answered a face-to-face, structured

interview, then completed self-administered

questionnaires (Grossarth-Matticeck health risk

questionnaire and POMS Depression, Anxiety, and

Anger scale) while the interviewer waited.

AUL-384 1992 Sydney Aircraft Noise Amelioration Attitudes

Survey

Date: 1992 (March to June)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Australia: Sydney (Kingsford Smith Airport)

N=: 431 (about 100 from each of the four cells of a

design based on noise exposure)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Burgess and Zehner 1993;Burgess and Zehner

1994a;Burgess and Zehner 1994b

Notes: The study found that most residents preferred noise

amelioration options that allowed them to stay in

their homes. Most residents did not realize that

noise insulation schemes would require the use of

air conditioning.

AUL-456 1995 Sydney Airport Ku-ring-gai Noise Survey

Date: 1995 (August to October: Follows a change in

operations in November 1994)
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-9-

Source: Aircraft

Location: Australia: Ku-ring-gai ( low-density housing areas

15 and 30 km north of Sydney airport)

N=: 1,138 (Some analyses use 1,018 responses)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bray 1996;Gross and Sim 1995;Gross and Sim

1997;Gross and Sim 1998

Notes: Responses were obtained through a mail

questionnaire. A larger number of people are

affected at low aircraft noise levels because more

people live at low noise levels.

AUL-461 1995-96 Four-Phase Sydney Road Traffic Noise

Survey

Date: 1995, 1996 (intervals of 4-6 months for a period of

two years)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Australia: Sydney (several suburbs)

N=: 48 responses from 12 respondents

Noise data: No

Reference: Jeon 1996;Jeon and Fricke 1995;Jeon and Fricke

1998

Notes: Respondents answered a mail survey at four times

over the two-year period. The noise exposure

appeared to not change and the respondents'

reactions did not change.

AUS-014 1964 Vienna Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1964

Source: Road traffic, Aircraft, Railway, Trolleys

Location: Austria: Vienna

N=: 400 (265 residents, 100 office workers, 35

teachers)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bruckmayer and Lang 1967;Fidell, Barber, and

Schultz 1991;Schultz 1978

Notes: Annoyance was the same in residences and offices

at the same noise levels and thus the two types of

ratings are not separated in the published tables. 

All respondents were employees or otherwise

associated with the Vienna Technological

Industrial Museum.

AUS-093 1973 Vienna Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1973

Source: Road traffic

Location: Austria: Vienna

N=: 2,624

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Lang 1975;Lang

1976;Lang 1977;Lang 1978;Schultz 1978

Notes: Respondents are more annoyed if their most

important rooms are on the noisy side of the house.

AUS-178 1977 Austrian Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1977

Source: Road traffic

Location: Austria: 49 measurement points in both rural and

urban areas

N=: 462

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lang 1978;Lang 1980

Notes: Respondents in rural areas were more likely to be

in single family homes, to have gardens, to be

along highways, and to be less annoyed by noise

than urban respondents at the same noise levels.

AUS-329 1989 Austrian Alps Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1989

Source: Road traffic (may be other sources)

Location: Austria: 5 communities in an area designated as

sensitive to environmental pollution

N=: 1,989

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lercher 1992;Lercher 1996;Lercher 1998;Lercher

and Widmann 1993

Notes: Perceived air pollution, noise sensitivity, and home

ownership were related to noise annoyance.

AUS-487 1998 Inn Valley Road/Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1998 (July)

Source: Road traffic, Railway

Location: Austria: rural areas in the Tyrol Alps

N=: 2,007

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Botteldooren, Verkeyn, and Lercher

2000a;Botteldooren, Verkeyn, and Lercher

2000b;Lercher 2001;Lercher, Brauchle, and

Widmann 1999;Sölder 1998

Notes: Interviews were conducted via telephone. The

study was conducted to identify recommendations

for a health impact assessment study.

AUS-488 1998 Tyrol Children/Mothers Noise Survey

Date: 1998 (June)

Source: Road traffic, Railway

Location: Austria: the Inn Valley (rural alpine area east of

Innsbruck)

N=: 1,280 children (number mailed to mothers is not

reported)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lercher 2001;Lercher, Brauchle, Kofler,

Widmann, and Meis 2000;Roner 1999;Roner and

Roitner-Grabher 1998;Sölder 1998

Notes: The study compared children's and mothers'

reactions to the same residential noise

environments. The self-administered

questionnaires were completed by children in a
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-10-

classroom and by mothers at home.

AUS-521 Austrian Transportation Noise and Blood Pressure

Survey

Date: 1998 (September to November)

Source: Road traffic, Railway

Location: Austria: the Inn Valley (rural alpine area east of

Innsbruck)

N=: 807

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lercher 2001;Lercher, Widmann, and Kofler

2000;Sölder 1998

Notes: This study used many of the same questions that

were used in AUS-487 and AUS-488. Only about

10 of the same people were in the other studies. 

The study took blood pressure readings and

analyzed the relationship between noise level and

blood pressure.

BEL-107 Preliminary Leuven Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1976 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Belgium: Leuven

N=: 247

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Gambart, Myncke, and Cops 1976

Notes: The survey was conducted to design two traffic

noise surveys (BEL-122, BEL-137).

BEL-122 1975 Antwerp Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1975 (May to October)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Belgium: Antwerp

N=: 1,319

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Cops, Myncke, Gambart, and Steenackers

1978;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Myncke,

Cops, and Gambart 1977;Myncke, Cops, Gambart,

and Steenackers 1979;Myncke, Cops, and

Steenackers 1977;Myncke, Cops, Steenackers,

Bruyninckx, Gambart, and Verleysen 1977;Schultz

1978

Notes: Respondents who volunteered to take part on the

basis of a request letter (about 14% response rate)

filled out a self-administered questionnaire. The

study is quite similar to the 1976 Brussels study

(BEL-137). Some questions were different in the

two questionnaires.

BEL-137 1976 Brussels Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1976 (May to October)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Belgium: Brussels

N=: 495

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Myncke, Cops,

and Gambart 1977;Myncke, Cops, Gambart, and

Steenackers 1979;Myncke, Cops, and Steenackers

1977;Myncke, Cops, Steenackers, Bruyninckx,

Gambart, and Verleysen 1977;Schultz 1978

Notes: Respondents who volunteered to take part on the

basis of a request letter (9% response rate) filled

out a self-administered questionnaire. The study is

quite similar to the 1975 Antwerp study (BEL122). Some questions were different in the two

questionnaires.

BEL-151 1977-78 Belgium Four-Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1977, 1978

Source: Aircraft

Location: Belgium: Four airports (Helchteren, Grimbergen,

Deurne, Middelkerke)

N=: 150

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Myncke and Cops 1978

Notes: The four airports include one military airfield, one

general aviation airport and two airports with both

commercial and general aviation movements.

BEL-288 1980s Brussels International Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1980 (June to November), 1984 (January to May),

1985 (January to May)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Belgium: Brussels (residents near 11 measurement

locations)

N=: 677 (1,400 were asked to participate)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Jonckheere 1984;Jonckheere 1987;Jonckheere

1988;Jonckheere 1989;Jonckheere and Swalens

1981

Notes: In 1980, 540 residents from the 1,000 sampled

addresses participated. Residents at rural sites are

somewhat less likely to be affected.

BRA-474 1994 Porto Alegre Noise Survey

Date: 1994 (September to December)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Brazil: Porto Alegro (southernmost capital city)

N=: 321

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Rott 1995;Sattler 1999;Sattler and Rott 1996

Notes: Road traffic is a major source of annoyance for the

population. Busses were the most annoying source

of road traffic noise.

CAN-055 1971 Dorval Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1971 (June to August)

Source: Aircraft
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-11-

Location: Canada: Dorval Airport in Montreal

N=: 1,000

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Canada Ministry of Transport 1972

Notes: Interviews were conducted with approximately 800

randomly selected residents and with subsamples

of approximately 150 specially identified

complainants and 150 anti-noise organization

members.

CAN-076 1972 London/Woodstock Community Noise Survey

Date: 1972-1973

Source: Community

Location: Canada: Ontario (London, Woodstock)

N=: 800

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Foreman and Dickinson 1973;Foreman and

Dickinson 1974;Foreman, Emmerson, and

Dickinson 1974

Notes: Two forms of the questionnaire were administered

to study methodological issues.

CAN-077 1972 Edmonton Community Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (Summer and early Fall)

Source: Community

Location: Canada: Edmonton

N=: 4,214

Noise data: No (No noise data are analyzed with interviews.)

Reference: Bolstad Engineering Associates 1973

Notes: The questionnaires were divided between 1201

face-to-face interviews and 3013 self-administered

questionnaires.

CAN-078 1972 Calgary Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (February to October)

Source: Community, Aircraft, Railway

Location: Canada: Calgary

N=: 1081

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Dunn, Hanington, Wilk, Wilson, and Dunn

1985;Dunn and Jones 1975;Dunn and Posey

1974;Jones, Li, and McKee 1973

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were used for the

"winter" (N504) and "summer" surveys (N226). A

different questionnaire was used for the personal,

face-to-face interviews (N351). In addition to the

residential data, information was collected in

hospitals, nursing homes, schools and shopping

areas.

CAN-079 1972 Toronto Community Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (March, April)

Source: Community

Location: Canada: Toronto

N=: 2,454

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bremner 1973

Notes: Interviews were completed near the noise

monitoring sites with both residents and some

nearby workers who lived elsewhere.

CAN-120 1975 Western Ontario University Traffic Noise

Survey

Date: 1975 (Summer and Fall), 1976 (May to September)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Canada: 47 sites in four cities (London, Toronto,

Tillsonburg, Ingersoll)

N=: 1,216 interviews with 1150 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bradley 1976;Bradley 1979;Bradley 1980;Bradley

and Jonah 1977;Bradley and Jonah 1979a;Bradley

and Jonah 1979b;Bradley and Jonah 1979c;Fields

and Hall 1987;Jonah, Bradley, and Dawson 1981

Notes: Sixty-six respondents were interviewed twice. The

same interview form was administered in two years

in four locations to study five types of area

characteristics.

CAN-121 1975-76 Southern Ontario Community Survey

Date: 1975 (May to July), 1976 (Summer)

Source: Community (especially road traffic)

Location: Canada: Toronto area (Hamilton, Burlington, 

Mississauga)

N=: 1,786

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Hall 1979;Hall,

Birnie, and Taylor 1978b;Hall, Birnie, and Taylor

1978a;Hall, Palmer, and Taylor 1983;Hall and

Taylor 1976a;Hall and Taylor 1976b;Hall and

Taylor 1977;Hall, Taylor, and Birnie 1977;Hall,

Taylor, Birnie, Breston, Gertler, and Moreau

1977;Schultz 1978;Taylor, Birnie, and Hall

1978;Taylor, Gertler, and Hall 1978;Taylor and

Hall 1977;Uptegrove, Hall, Taylor, and Goulden

1977

Notes: The questionnaire in the second year obtained

more information about road traffic. Some sites

had noise barriers.

CAN-126 Toronto Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1975 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Railway

Location: Canada: Toronto

N=: 170 (approximately)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hemingway 1975;Hemingway 1976

Notes: Ambient noise levels did not affect ratings of

railway noise.
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-12-

CAN-136 1976 Canada Impulse Noise Survey

Date: 1976 (June to October)

Source: Impulse noise from drop forging industrial plants

Location: Canada: Welland, Port Colborne, Windsor

N=: 607

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Seshagiri 1979;Seshagiri 1981

Notes: Residents rated industrial noise that could be heard

from their homes. The annoyance with drop forge

noise is greater than with road traffic noise of an

equivalent noise level.

CAN-168 1978 Canadian Four-Airport Survey

Date: 1978 (Summer), 1979 (Summer)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Canada: Four airports (Toronto, Buttonville,

Waterloo-Wellington, Oshawa)

N=: 965 original interviews (212 repeated interviews in

1979)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Birnie, Hall, and Taylor 1980a;Birnie, Hall, and

Taylor 1980b;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz

1991;Hall, Birnie, and Taylor 1979;Hall, Birnie,

Taylor, and Palmer 1981;Hall, Dixit, and Taylor

1980;Hall, Palmer, and Taylor 1983;Hall and

Taylor 1982;Hall, Taylor, and Birnie 1980;Taylor

1982;Taylor 1984;Taylor, Hall, and Birnie

1979;Taylor, Hall, and Birnie 1980;Taylor, Hall,

and Birnie 1981;Taylor, Hall, and Birnie 1987

Notes: In 1979, 212 respondents were reinterviewed in

Toronto. Three of the airports were general

aviation airports. Conclusions about the relative

degree of annoyance at Toronto and a smaller

airport differed for different noise impact

indicators.

CAN-169 1978-79 Canadian Five Railway Yard Survey

Date: 1978-1979

Source: Railway

Location: Canada: Five railway yards in Ontario

N=: 544

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Dixit and Reburn 1980;Hall, Dixit, and Taylor

1980

Notes: Annoyance with railway yard noise is greater than

with road traffic or aircraft noise at the same noise

levels.

CAN-174 1978 Canadian National Community Noise Survey

Date: 1978 (June to September)

Source: Community, Aircraft, Railway

Location: Canada: National sample as well as special

samples near two airports (St. Hubert in Quebec:

Waterville in Nova Scotia) and four railway sites

(Truro in Nova Scotia; Grand Falls, St. Leonard,

and Edmunston in New Brunswick).

N=: 8,838

Noise data: Yes (for 150 respondents)

Reference: Peat Marwick and Partners 1979

Notes: These data have not been analyzed but are fully

documented. The survey is sometimes labeled the

"National Household Survey of Noise Exposure."

CAN-181 1979 Canadian Three Airport General Aviation

Study

Date: 1979 (July)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Canada: Three general aviation airports (Oshawa,

Buttonville, Maple)

N=: 30

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Taylor, Birnie, and Hall 1980

Notes: Some residents had also been interviewed in 1978

(CAN-168). A major study objective is to contrast

three study methods: in-depth interview, diary, and

field experiment.

CAN-236 1981 Southern Ontario Community Survey

Date: 1981 (Summer)

Source: Road traffic, Railway, Aircraft

Location: Canada: Southern Ontario

N=: 406 (57 study sites)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hall, Taylor, and Birnie 1983;Hall, Taylor, and

Birnie 1985;Taylor, Hall, and Birnie 1984

Notes: The probability of annoyance is predicted as a

function of self-reported activity interference in a

logit analysis.

CAN-262 Canadian Party Wall Insulation Pilot Survey

Date: 1982 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Interior noise

Location: Canada

N=: 98 (49 pairs of adjacent neighbors)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bradley 1982;Bradley 1983a;Bradley 1983b

Notes: Annoyance with neighbors' noise is less in

residences with greater transmission loss for the

party walls.

CAN-279 1976 Toronto Freeway 401 Privacy Fence Survey

Date: 1976 (Spring and Autumn)

Source: Freeway traffic

Location: Canada: Four areas along the 401 freeway in

Toronto

N=: 251

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Andrew and Sharratt 1976
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-13-

Notes: Residents were interviewed about a privacy fence

that had been erected in November 1974. No

interviews were conducted before the installation of

the fence. The survey was conducted at two times

to contrast reactions to freeway conditions at two

times of year.

CAN-280 1978 Etobicoke/Ottawa Noise Barrier Study

Date: 1976, 1978 (Autumn in both years)

Source: Freeway traffic

Location: Canada: Etobicoke (2 areas on Route 401 near

Toronto) and Ottawa (near Queensway)

N=: 1,194

Noise data: Yes (for some locations near barriers)

Reference: Schliewinsky and Adams 1979

Notes: Interviews were conducted before and after a

barrier was installed in areas near the barrier and

in nearby control areas. Some respondents were

reinterviewed. Noise levels decreased by 6 decibels

in some locations. Results are not analyzed by

noise level.

CAN-322 1990 Toronto Air Conditioner Survey

Date: 1990 (Summer)

Source: Residential air conditioners, Heat pumps

Location: Canada: Toronto

N=: 550 with both survey and noise data

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bradley 1991;Bradley 1993

Notes: Annoyance with air conditioners decreases as

ambient noise levels increase. The interpretation is

uncertain because the air conditioner noise level

indicator includes ambient noise in some locations.

CAN-385 1990s Vancouver Airport Noise Change Survey

Date: 1995 (August 17-20), 1998 (August 20-24)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Canada: Vancouver International Airport (10

areas)

N=: 2,067 (1,000 in the year 1995, 1,067 in 1998)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell and Silvati 1998;Fidell, Silvati, and Fletcher

1995;Grigg, Haboly, and Cheng 2000

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted in the same

area before and after a change in noise exposure.

CHI-230 1975 Beijing Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1975

Source: Road traffic

Location: China: 20 streets in Beijing

N=: Not known

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Chang 1981

Notes: Residents answered a self-administered

questionnaire.

CHI-386 1986-1989 Chinese Five-City Road Traffic Noise

Survey

Date: 1986 to 1989 (Year may differ by city)

Source: Road traffic

Location: China: 5 cities (Harbin, Tianjin, Shanghai,

Shijiazhuang, Fuzhou)

N=: 2,969

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Zhao and Chen 1992

Notes: There was no obvious difference in the reactions of

respondents of different genders or ages to similar

noise levels.

CHI-457 1986 Beijing City (Nagoya Comparison) Survey

Date: 1986 (Spring)

Source: Community, Road traffic

Location: China: Beijing

N=: 353

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kuno et al. 1987;Kuno, Oishi, Mishina, Hayashi,

Zheng, Cai, and Chen 1992;Kuno, Oishi, Mishina,

Hayashi, Zheng, Cai, and Chen 1993;Oishi,

Mishina, Hayashi, Okumura, and Kuno 1989

Notes: Reactions to noise in Beijing, China were similar

to those in a Nagoya, Japan study (JPN-294).

CHI-514 1985 Student Noise Attitudes Study

(Beijing/Tsinghua)

Date: 1985 (September)

Source: Community

Location: China: Beijing

N=: 402

Noise data: No

Reference: Zheng, Cai, and Chen 1986

Notes: University students answered this written

questionnaire's general statements about neighbors'

noise. There are some differences between

perceptions and attitudes toward neighbors' noise

in England, Germany and Japan. The

questionnaire is nearly identical to questionnaires

administered in Japan (JPN-510), England (UKD512), Germany (GER-511), and the United States

(USA-513).

CZE-109 Bratislava Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1974 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Czechoslovakia: 12 streets in Bratislava

N=: The survey was carried out for 340 apartments

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Radulov 1974

Notes: Annoyance is affected by the height of the
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-14-

apartment.

CZE-402 1995-97 Czech Noise/Public Health Survey

Date: 1995, 1997 (April in 1997)

Source: Community

Location: Czech Republic: (21 cities)

N=: 24,277

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sisma 1998;Sisma 2000

Notes: The study reports a relationship between noise and

some types of diseases.

DEN-075 1972 Copenhagen Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (August, September)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Denmark: Copenhagen (28 study areas)

N=: 960

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Kragh

1977;Relster 1975;Relster 1981;Schultz 1978

Notes: The study was designed to test the effect of housing

type (apartments compared to other types) on

response to traffic noise.

DEN-200 1979 Danish Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1979 (August, September)

Source: Railway

Location: Denmark

N=: 615

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Andersen, Kühl, and Relster 1980;Andersen, Kühl,

and Relster 1983;Andersen, Kühl, and Relster

1988;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Kühl

1980;Miljøstyrelsen 1982

Notes: More than half reported that goods trains are a

special problem.

DEN-333 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study (Denmark)

Date: 1992 (November)

Source: Wind Turbine

Location: Denmark

N=: 199

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Wolsink and Sprengers 1993

Notes: Two similar studies were conducted in Germany

(GER-335) and the Netherlands (NET-334).

DEN-380 1983 Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Survey

Date: 1983 (September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Denmark: Kastrup Airport

N=: At least 570 (total is uncertain)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Socialforskningsintituttet 1987

Notes: None

DEN-381 1986 Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Followup

Survey

Date: 1986 (September 19 to 30)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Denmark: Kastrup Airport

N=: At least 570 (total is uncertain)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Socialforskningsintituttet 1987

Notes: None

DEN-387 1999-2000 Øster Søgade Copenhagen Porous

Asphalt Survey

Date: 1999 (March, before study), 2000 (March, after

study)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Denmark: Copenhagen (Øster Søgade)

N=: 329 (173 before change, 156 after change )

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Larsen and Bendtsen 2001

Notes: A questionnaire was left in the mailbox with a selfaddressed return envelope. The study examined

reactions before and seven months after a road was

rebuilt with a quieter road surface, porous asphalt.

DEN-388 1998 Danish Speed Bump Noise Survey

Date: 1998 (April)

Source: Road traffic (near speed bumps)

Location: Denmark

N=: 262

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bendtsen and Larsen 2000

Notes: None

DEN-389 1998 Danish Road Traffic Noise Barrier Study

Date: 1998 (April)

Source: Major roads

Location: Denmark: 5 areas, two without barriers and three

with barriers

N=: 261

Noise data: No

Reference: Bendtsen and Larsen 2001

Notes: A questionnaire was left in the mailbox with a selfaddressed return envelope. This was a pilot survey

to learn about reactions to noise barriers.

DEN-390 1999 Aarhus Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1999 (May, June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Denmark: Aarhus Municipality, including the

second largest city (Aarhus), small communities,

and rural areas

N=: 3,378
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-15-

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bendtsen, Larsen, and Mikkelsen 2000

Notes: A postal questionnaire was distributed.

DEN-519 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study

(Denmark)

Date: 1971

Source: Aircraft

Location: Denmark: Copenhagen and Billund airports

N=: 1,119 from 12 areas (10 at Copenhagen and 2 at

Billund)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Åhrlin 1988;Åhrlin and Rylander 1979;Berglund,

Berglund, Jonsson, and Lindvall 1977;Berglund,

Berglund, and Lindvall 1975;Berglund, Berglund,

and Lindvall 1987;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz

1991;Rylander, Björkman, Åhrlin, Sörensen, and

Berglund 1980;Rylander, Björkman, and Sörensen

1993;Rylander and Sörensen 1973;Rylander,

Sörensen, Alexandre, and Gilbert 1973;Rylander,

Sörensen, and Berglund 1974;Rylander, Sörensen,

and Kajland 1972;Schultz 1978;Sörensen,

Berglund, and Rylander 1973

Notes: The 3,746 interviews from this and two other

studies (DEN-519, NOR-520, SWE-035) have been

analyzed as a single data set. (They were

represented as a single study, SWE-035, in the

1981 and 1991 editions of this catalog.) The faceto-face interview was modified somewhat between

the first and last interviews (from 1969 to 1976) in

the three countries. The reports state that

annoyance is less closely related to energy-based

noise indices such as LAeq and FBN than to

indices based on peak noise levels and numbers of

aircraft.

EGY-357 Alexandria Tram Noise Study

Date: 1993 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Tramway

Location: Egypt: Alexandria

N=: 85

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Alim and Zaki 1993a;Alim and Zaki 1993b;Alim

and Zaki 1994

Notes: Annoyance with noise and vibration was studied at

10 sites.

FRA-016 1965 French Four-Airport Noise Study

Date: 1965 (November) to 1966 (April)

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: Four airports (Le Bourget (Paris), Orly

(Paris), Marseilles, Lyon)

N=: Approximately 2,000

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Alexandre 1970;Association d'Anthropologie

Appliquée 1967;Centre Scientifique et Technique

du Bâtiment 1968;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz

1991;Josse 1969;Rylander, Sörensen, Alexandre,

and Gilbert 1973;Rylander, Sörensen, and

Berglund 1974;Schultz 1978

Notes: None

FRA-017 1965 French Regional Sonic Boom Survey

Date: 1965

Source: Sonic booms

Location: France: both eastern and southwestern regions of

France

N=: 2,296

Noise data: No

Reference: de Brisson 1966

Notes: The study included a subsample of residents who

had complained about sonic booms.

FRA-019 1965 Paris Expressway Noise Survey

Date: 1965

Source: Expressway traffic

Location: France: Paris area

N=: 420 (370 were used in the analysis)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Lamure and

Bacelon 1967;Schultz 1978

Notes: None

FRA-041 1969 Paris Road Traffic Noise Study

Date: 1969

Source: Road traffic

Location: France: Paris area

N=: 700

Noise data: Yes (for 500 interviews)

Reference: Aubree, Auzou, and Rapin 1971;Fidell, Barber,

and Schultz 1991;Schultz 1978

Notes: Noise annoyance is related to other evaluations of

neighborhoods.

FRA-045 1970 French Sonic Boom Survey

Date: 1970 (November 11 to 16)

Source: Sonic booms

Location: France

N=: 2,848 main study interviews, also 283

complainants

Noise data: No (Only the number of booms is known.)

Reference: Bremond 1974;Centre d'Etudes et Recherches

Psychologiques Air 1971

Notes: The study includes a subsample of 283

complainants.

FRA-056 1971 Orly Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1971 (April 18 to May 17 for main study)
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-16-

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: Orly airport (Paris)

N=: 4,998 in main study. In-depth interviews were

conducted with 39 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Francois 1972;Francois 1975a;Francois

1979b;Francois and Roche 1973

Notes: The in-depth interviews are described in one

publication (Francois, 1972).

FRA-063 1972 Paris Area Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (April)

Source: Railway

Location: France: Paris area

N=: 350

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Aubree 1973;Aubree 1975;Fidell, Barber, and

Schultz 1991;Gilbert 1973;Schultz 1978

Notes: None

FRA-087 1973 St Cyr L'Ecole General Aviation Noise

Survey

Date: 1973 (October)

Source: General aviation

Location: France: Six areas around St. Cyr L'Ecole Airport

N=: 401

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Francois 1975b

Notes: The study was designed for comparison with the

1971 Orly Study (FRA-056).

FRA-092 1973 French Ten-City Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1973 (September, October), 1974 (January), 1975

(September)

Source: Road traffic

Location: France: 10 cities

N=: 1,200

Noise data: Yes

Reference: IRT-CERN 1976;Vallet, Maurin, Page, Favre, and

Pachiaudi 1978

Notes: After the first set of interviews (in 1973 for nine

sites and January 1974 for Lyon Villeurbanne) two

of the sites (Nimes and Bourg) were revisited for

200 additional interviews (September 1975). 

Interviews were not necessarily conducted with the

same respondents.

FRA-098 1974-75 Roissy Airport Before/After Opening

Noise Survey

Date: 1974 (February 19 to 25), 1975 (March 17 to April

3)

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: Charles de Gaulle airport (Roissy area near

Paris)

N=: 1,174 interviews from 690 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Francois 1975d;Francois 1977a;Francois 1979b

Notes: Interviews were conducted with the same 484

residents just before and one year after opening the

opening of Charles de Gaulle airport on March 8,

1974. The study was especially designed for

comparison to a 1975 Orly survey (FRA-113) and

1974 French National Aircraft survey (FRA-099). 

Information is available on 80 respondents leaving

the area in the first year of the airport's operation.

FRA-099 1974 French National Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1974 (December 9 to 20)

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: Probability sample of France

N=: 1,000

Noise data: No

Reference: Francois 1975d;Francois 1980

Notes: This study was designed for comparison with the

1975 Orly (FRA-113) and 1974-75 Roissy studies

(FRA-098)

FRA-113 1975 Orly Airport Noise Study

Date: 1975 (March 3 to 15)

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: Orly Airport (Paris)

N=: 997

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Francois 1975d;Francois 1977a;Francois

1977b;Francois 1979b;Francois 1980

Notes: The study was designed for comparison with the

1974 French National Aircraft Noise Survey (FRA099) and the Roissy Airport Before-After Opening

Noise Survey (FRA-098).

FRA-124 1975-76 l'Hay les Roses Barrier Survey

Date: 1975-76 (October)

Source: Motorway traffic

Location: France: l'Hay les Roses (South of Paris)

N=: 700

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Vallet, Abramowitch, and Lambert 1977;Vallet,

Abramowitch, and Lambert 1979

Notes: Residents were interviewed six months after the

barrier was built about their evaluation of the noise

before and after the barrier was built.

FRA-131 1976 Orly Medical Effects Pilot Study

Date: 1976 (June)

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: One high noise area around Orly and two

comparative samples from low noise areas

N=: 150
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-17-

Noise data: No

Reference: Francois 1977c

Notes: The standard interview is supplemented by a selfadministered questionnaire and by a medical

examination. The study was designed to test the

methodology for a medical effects survey. The

study examined the possibility that some of the

variation in attitudes could be related to physical

characteristics of respondents.

FRA-146 1977 French Light Aircraft Study

Date: 1977 (May 25 to June 22)

Source: Light aircraft

Location: France: Four Paris-area airports (Chavenay,

Guyancourt, St-Cyr-l`Ecole, Chelles-le-Pin)

N=: 800

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bremond 1979b;Centre d'Etudes et Recherches

Psychologiques Air 1978

Notes: Aircraft noise annoyance is greatest on weekends.

FRA-150 1977 Roissy Airport Survey

Date: 1977 (October 24 to November 21)

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: Roissy

N=: 943

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Francois 1979a

Notes: Of the 943 respondents, 218 had also been

interviewed in 1974 and 1975. The study was

designed for comparison with an earlier Roissy

study (FRA-098).

FRA-189 1971 French Concorde Sonic Boom Study

Date: 1971 (May)

Source: Sonic booms from Concorde

Location: France: Three areas from previous sonic boom

study (FRA-045)

N=: 1,202

Noise data: No (Only the number of booms is known.)

Reference: Bremond 1971

Notes: Concorde flights generated three booms in the

week preceding the interview. Respondents

regularly heard other sonic booms. Respondents

compared reactions to booms in the previous week

to the booms normally heard.

FRA-197 1979 French Behavioral Effects of Road Noise

Study

Date: 1979

Source: Road traffic

Location: France: 15 areas in Lyon and Marseilles

N=: 1,486

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lambert and Plouhinec 1985;Lambert and

Simonnet 1980;Lambert, Simonnet, and Vallet

1983;Lambert, Simonnet, and Vallet 1984

Notes: The study measured behavioral reactions (e.g..

closing windows, location of activities in the home

and use of out-of-doors space) at different noise

levels. In-depth interviews and observations were

completed with 40 respondents in five of the sites

after the main survey.

FRA-218 1975 Strasbourg Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1975

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: Strasbourg airport

N=: 405 interviews (9 other in-depth interviews)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Francois 1974;Francois 1975c

Notes: The study was designed for comparison with an

earlier study at Orly (FRA-056). Detailed

information is available for nine in-depth

exploratory interviews conducted in December

1974.

FRA-239 1984-1986 French Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

Date: 1984 (September) to 1986 (May)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: France: around Orly, Roissy, Nice, and Antibes

airports

N=: 1,032 (570, Orly; 281, Roissy; 101, Nice; 80

Antibes)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Diamond and Walker 1986a;Diamond and Walker

1986b;Vallet et al. 1986;Vallet, Pachiaudi,

Depitre, Tanguy, and Francois 1988

Notes: This survey was jointly designed under

Commission of European Communities auspices

for comparison with a Glasgow Survey (UKD-238)

and a Schiphol Survey (NET-240).

FRA-252 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study (France)

Date: 1982 (December), 1983 (January to March)

Source: Impulse noise (Shooting range, Shunting Yard,

Building Site), Road traffic

Location: France: Athis-Mons, Antibes, Saint-Denis

N=: 451

Noise data: Yes

Reference: de Jong and Commins 1983;Groeneveld

1986;Groeneveld and de Jong 1984;Groeneveld

and de Jong 1985b;Groeneveld and de Jong

1985a;Miedema 1987;Rabrait 1984

Notes: This is part of a coordinated Commission of

European Communities joint study in Germany

(GER-253), Ireland (IRE-254) and the Netherlands
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-18-

(NET- 355). The study results support at least

a 15-decibel penalty for impulse noise.

FRA-289 1986-87 French National Transportation Noise

Survey

Date: 1986, 1987

Source: Community, Road traffic

Location: France: Probability sample of the French

population

N=: 2,010

Noise data: Yes (for 375 respondents)

Reference: Lambert, Maurin, Boscher, and Lebart

1988;Maurin and Lambert 1990;Maurin, Lambert,

and Alauzet 1988;Maurin, Lambert, Alauzet, and

Chapuy 1988

Notes: Noise is the nuisance that is most often mentioned

in this national study.

FRA-323 1976 Nationwide Noise Survey of France

Date: 1976

Source: Community, Road traffic

Location: France: National random sample of France

N=: 1,000

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Maurin and Lambert 1990;Maurin, Lambert, and

Alauzet 1988

Notes: Many aspects of the study were repeated in a 1986

survey (FRA-289). Road traffic is the most often

mentioned noise nuisance.

FRA-336 1991 TGV High Speed Train Pilot Survey

Date: 1991 (September)

Source: Railway

Location: France: 4 sites

N=: 39

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lambert, Champelovier, and Vernet 1993

Notes: The interviews were tape recorded, and conducted

with open questions to aid in the development of

the questionnaire for a large scale survey. TGV

operations were begun one to two years before the

study.

FRA-342 1992 French Home Insulation Survey

Date: 1992 (July-September)

Source: Community, Interior noise from other dwellings.

Location: France: three regions

N=: 453

Noise data: Yes: sound insulation information

Reference: Aubree 1993

Notes: Acoustic properties were found to have improved

during a 20-year period but a large minority of the

owners were still not satisfied.

FRA-346 1991 French Before/After Noise Abatement Survey

Date: 1991 (January and March--before), (June and

September--after)

Source: Motorway

Location: France

N=: 75

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Vallet, Vincent, Champelovier, Vernet, Annequin,

Olivier, and Baez 1992;Vernet, Vallet, Vincent,

Champelovier, Annequin, Baez, and Olivier

1992;Vincent and Champelovier 1992;Vincent and

Champelovier 1993

Notes: Road traffic noise was reduced through barriers

and a low noise surface at two locations, but

annoyance did not decrease as much as expected.

FRA-364 1993-94 French 18-Site Time-Of-Day Study

Date: 1993 (September) - 1994 (June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: France: (18 sites)

N=: 895 analyzed responses (Of the 1,018 collected,

the 66 with no noise data and 57 with incomplete

or inconsistent annoyance data were not analyzed)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Maurin 1996;Vallet, Vernet, Champelovier, and

Maurin 1996

Notes: Annoyance was assessed at different times of day

and for dwellings with and without all windows

facing on the main road.

FRA-391 1998-99 Orly Airport Contingent Valuation Noise

Survey

Date: 1998 (October), 1999 (April)

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: Orly airport (6 districts of Val-de-Marne:

Ablon, Boissy-St-Léger, Limeil-Brévannes, Orly,

Valenton, Villeneuve-le-Roi)

N=: 607 (It is not clear whether this includes some

pretests)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Faburel and Luchini 2000

Notes: The exposure to aircraft noise and degree of

aircraft noise annoyance affect the willingness to

pay for aircraft noise reduction.

FRA-392 1998 Paris "Zone 30" Noise Survey

Date: 1998 (May, June, September)

Source: Many community sounds ( Some may be generally

be positively evaluated)

Location: France: Two roads in Paris (Buttes-aux-Cailles13éA and Nationale 13éA)

N=: 400

Noise data: No

Reference: Rozec and Moch 2000;Rozec and Rumeau 2000
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-19-

Notes: Respondents were interviewed on the street, but

were asked about their reactions in their local

homes as well as other locations. The study

examined reactions in specially protected noise

zones (zones 30).

FRA-393 1997 France Road/Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1997 (October, November)

Source: Road traffic, Railway

Location: France: (62 sites along railway lines)

N=: 700

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Joncour, Cailhau, Gautier, Champelovier, and

Lambert 2000

Notes: The purpose of the study was to determine the

effects of combined noise sources.

FRA-394 1997 Besançon Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1997 (October)

Source: Road traffic

Location: France: Besançon

N=: 1,910 (total of 2,702 responses but analyzed only

the 1,910 from types of areas with more than 30

responses)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Houot 1999a;Houot 1999b;Houot 2000

Notes: The self-administered questionnaires were left in

each respondent's postbox. The study is part of a

project to link annoyance levels to information

available from geographical GIS data bases.

FRA-395 1998 Orly/Roissy Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1998 (Autumn) - 1999 (January)

Source: Aircraft

Location: France: Orly and Roissy airports (42 locations in

32 communities)

N=: 1,473

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Vincent, Vallet, Olivier, and Paque 2000

Notes: The study was planned to test the French IP index

and to measure reactions where the noise levels

had increased at Roissy Airport.

FRA-396 1993 TGV High Speed Train Survey

Date: 1993

Source: High speed railway (TGV Atlantique railway line)

Location: France: (25 rural sites)

N=: 260

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lambert, Champelovier, and Vernet

1996;Lambert, Champelovier, Vernet, Annequin,

and Baez 1994;Lambert, Champelovier, Vernet,

Annequin, and Baez 1995

Notes: The purpose of the study is to determine whether

existing noise limit guidelines are suitable for high

speed railways.

GER-034 1969 Munich Airport Noise (DFG Aircraft Noise

Study)

Date: 1969 (February to June)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Germany: Munich Airport

N=: 660 main social survey interviews (also 115

repeated interviews, 152 migrant interviews)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 1974;Fidell,

Barber, and Schultz 1991;Finke and Martin

1974;Finke, Martin, Guski, Rohrmann, Schümer,

and Schümer-Kohrs 1975;Martin, Rohrmann, and

Finke 1973;Rohrmann, Schümer, Schümer-Kohrs,

Guski, and Finke 1973;Schultz 1978

Notes: This survey was one part of a multi-disciplinary

study. In addition to 660 main interviews, 152

migrants were interviewed, 115 retests were

performed, 375 respondents had special

psychological and physiological tests, and 392 had

medical tests.

GER-037 1969 Meppen Sonic Boom Field Experiment

Date: 1969 (September)

Source: Sonic booms

Location: Germany: Meppen

N=: 39

Noise data: Yes

Reference: May 1971b;May 1971a;May 1972

Notes: Respondents rated every sonic boom that they

heard as they went about their normal activities.

GER-114 1975 German General Aviation Survey

Date: 1975 (April)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Germany: Four airports (Egelsbach, BonnHangelar, Karlsruhe-Forchheim, Braunschweig)

N=: 398

Noise data: No

Reference: Rohrmann 1975;Rohrmann 1976

Notes: It is concluded that disturbance is greater (for the

same noise level) at small airports than at large

airports.

GER-134 1976 Hamburg Urban Noise Survey

Date: 1976 (August, September)

Source: Road traffic, Railway, Industrial, Aircraft,

Construction

Location: Germany: Hamburg

N=: 643

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Finke, Guski, and Rohrmann 1980;Guski
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-20-

1985;Guski, Wichmann, Rohrmann, and Finke

1978;Rohrmann 1978;Rohrmann, Finke, and

Guski 1980;Rohrmann and Scharnberg

1981;Rylander, Sörensen, and Berglund 1974

Notes: This is part of an interdisciplinary study that

included several other data collection techniques.

GER-135 1976 Stuttgart Railway/Road Noise Survey

Date: 1976 (Summer)

Source: Railway, Road traffic

Location: Germany: Stuttgart

N=: 1,125

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Heimerl and Holzmann 1978

Notes: Railway noise is less annoying than road traffic

noise at the same noise level.

GER-164 1973 Düsseldorf Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1973

Source: Road traffic

Location: Germany: Düsseldorf (8 streets)

N=: 274

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Buchta and Kastka 1977a;Buchta and Kastka

1977b;Kastka 1983;Kastka and Buchta

1977;Kastka, Buchta, Paulsen, and Ritterstaedt

1984

Notes: The study examined the different sources of

annoyance.

GER-192 1977-83 German Road/Railway Noise Comparison

Study

Date: 1977-1978 1983 (Winter, 1977 or Summer, 1978

for most sites. Some sites added in 1983.)

Source: Road traffic, Railway

Location: Germany: 26 areas

N=: 1,651

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Knall and Schümer 1983;Möhler 1988;Möhler and

Knall 1983;Möhler, Schümer, Knall, and

Schümer-Kohrs 1986;Planungsbüro Obermeyer

1983;Schümer, Kasubek, Knall, and SchümerKohrs 1981;Schümer and Schümer-Kohrs

1983;Schümer and Zeichart 1989a;Schümer and

Zeichart 1989b;Schümer, Zeichart, and SchümerKohrs 1988

Notes: Road traffic is generally more annoying than

railway noise at the same noise level. Since the

initial 1977-78 survey at 14 sites, additional sites

have been added.

GER-231 1981 Blast Furnace and Road Noise Study

Date: 1981

Source: Road traffic

Location: Germany: 2 areas

N=: Approximately 35

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Ritterstaedt and Kastka 1981

Notes: The study compared reactions to road traffic noise

and to less variable noise from a blast furnace.

GER-246 1977-78 German Six-City Traffic Change Panel

Study

Date: 1977-1978 (Autumn both years)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Germany: residential areas in 6 cities

N=: 3,405 interviews (1,709 before and 1,696 after a

change.)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kastka 1980;Kastka 1981

Notes: Residents were surveyed both before and after

changes had been made in traffic patterns for

safety reasons. The mean change in noise level

between the two phases was about one decibel

(with accompanying changes in numbers and speed

of vehicles) but there was a disproportionately

large change in annoyance.

GER-253 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Germany)

Date: 1983 (January to March)

Source: Impulse noise (Drop forges, Shooting range), Road

traffic

Location: Germany: Resse, Haan, Solingen, Plettenberg

N=: 334

Noise data: Yes

Reference: de Jong and Commins 1983;Groeneveld

1986;Groeneveld and de Jong 1984;Groeneveld

and de Jong 1985a;Groeneveld and de Jong

1985b;Kastka and Langdon 1985;Kastka and

Ritterstaedt 1984;Miedema 1987;Ritterstaedt and

Kastka 1985

Notes: This is part of a Commission of European

Communities coordinated joint study in France

(FRA-252), Germany (GER-253), Ireland (IRE254) and the Netherlands (NET- 355). The study

results support at least a 10-decibel penalty for

impulse noise.

GER-256 Berlin Nighttime Noise Survey

Date: 1985 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Germany: 222 residential areas in West Berlin

N=: 683

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Guski 1985;Scharnberg 1985;Scharnberg and

Wühler 1982;Scharnberg, Wühler, Finke, and

Guski 1982
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-21-

Notes: Daytime disturbance levels are related to

annoyance. Window closing behavior and the

location of sleeping rooms appear to explain the

low relation between noise level and sleep

response.

GER-275 1986-87 Darmstadt Movers Survey

Date: 1986 (August) to 1987 (about November)

Source: Community

Location: Germany: Urban and suburban areas in Darmstadt

N=: 163 respondents providing approximately 400

responses

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Paechter, Rohrmann, Wertenbroch, and Wetzel

1988

Notes: The sample consisted of 92 movers who were

looking for new homes and a control group of 71

residents who were not looking. Both groups

received an initial face-to-face interview and a

final telephone interview. Movers evaluated the

noise at their new residence less favorably four

months after moving in than they did before

moving in.

GER-278 1980 German Shooting Range Survey

Date: 1980 (May to October), 1981 (April)

Source: Small firearms, Road traffic

Location: Germany: two military shooting ranges (Resse,

Schepsdorf) and three civil shooting ranges

(Bottrop, Datteln, Troisdorf)

N=: 392 (about 80 from each site)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Buchta 1984;Buchta 1988;Buchta 1990;Buchta,

Buchta, Koslowsky, and Rohland 1982;Vos and

Buchta 2000

Notes: Results from this field survey indicate that

shooting range noise is the equivalent of about 15

decibels more annoying than road traffic noise. 

These findings are compared to a laboratory study

that found a difference in reactions equivalent to

approximately 6 decibels.

GER-281 1976-77 German Highway Noise Study

Date: 1980 (May to October), 1981 (April)

Source: Expressway traffic

Location: Germany: (4 towns with 5 sites with 2 to 4 study

zones at each site)

N=: 359

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kastka 1983;Kastka, Buchta, Paulsen, and

Ritterstaedt 1984;Kastka, Hall, and Noack 1983

Notes: Distance from the highway has only a small effect

on noise annoyance after controlling for noise

level. Some of these sites were resurveyed in a

later survey (GER-282).

GER-282 1979 Wuppertal/Düsseldorf Traffic Noise Barriers

Study

Date: 1979

Source: Road traffic

Location: Germany: Wuppertal and Düsseldorf

N=: 138

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kastka, Buchta, Paulsen, and Ritterstaedt

1984;Kastka and Paulsen 1979;Langdon and

Griffiths 1982

Notes: The interviews were conducted after barriers had

been erected in some areas where interviews had

previously been conducted in 1976 or 1977 (GER281).

GER-290 1981 German Military Training Area Survey

Date: 1981

Source: Cannon fire, Aircraft, Rifle fire

Location: Germany: 21 communities near five military

training areas (Munster, Senne, Grafenwöhr,

Bergen, Hohenfels)

N=: 427

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Buchta 1988;Buchta, Buchta, and Loosen 1986

Notes: C-weighted indices of the noise environment

correlated only slightly better with the annoyance

scores than A-weighted indices. This study was

designed for comparison to a road traffic and

impulse noise study (GER-278).

GER-291 1984 Visual Context of Noise Survey (Germany)

Date: 1984

Source: Road traffic

Location: Germany: Ratingen

N=: 240 (approximately) surveyed but fewer are used

for many analyses

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kastka and Noack 1987;Kastka, Noack, Mau,

Maas, Conrad, Ritterstaedt, and Hangartner 1986

Notes: This is the German part of a German/Swiss survey

(SWI-312). Both mail and face-to-face

questionnaires were used in Germany. The streets

of the Swiss town were judged to be more

attractive. At the same noise exposure, the Swiss

respondents were less annoyed than the German

respondents.

GER-335 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study (Germany)

Date: 1992 (September, November)

Source: Wind Turbine

Location: Germany

N=: 216
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-22-

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Wolsink and Sprengers 1993

Notes: Similar studies were conducted at the same time in

Denmark (DEN-333) and the Netherlands (NET334).

GER-363 1988 German Noise Barrier Evaluation Survey

Date: 1988

Source: Road traffic

Location: Germany: Düsseldorf, Wuppertal, Krefeld, Neuss

N=: 293

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kastka, Buchta, Ritterstaedt, Paulsen, and Mau

1995

Notes: Interviews were conducted after barriers had been

erected in some areas where interviews had

previously been conducted in 1976 (GER-281).

Many, but not all, respondents were interviewed

both times.

GER-372 1985-86 Ratingen Düsseldorf Road Traffic/Aircraft

Survey

Date: 1985 (December), 1986 (January)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: Germany: Düsseldorf, Ratingen

N=: 564

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kastka, Borsch-Galetke, Guski, Krauth, Paulsen,

Schümer, and Oliva 1995;Paulsen, Mau, and

Kastka 1986

Notes: None

GER-373 1987 Düsseldorf/Ratingen Aircraft/ Road Traffic

Survey

Date: 1987 (November, December)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: Germany: Ratingen

N=: 516

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kastka, Borsch-Galetke, Guski, Krauth, Paulsen,

Schümer, and Oliva 1995;Kastka, Mau, Muth, and

Siegmann 1996

Notes: None

GER-374 1993 Greifswald Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1993 ( June to August )

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: Germany: Greifswald

N=: 578 (61 streets)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Schomer 1996

Notes: The study was conducted in Griefswald, a city in

the former German Democratic Republic, that

experienced substantial changes in road traffic

after reunification with the German Federal

Republic.

GER-454 1991 German Artillery and Road Traffic Noise

Survey

Date: 1991 (Summer)

Source: Large firearms, Road traffic

Location: Germany: 2 military training fields (17 residential

areas near Bergen and Munster)

N=: 433

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Buchta and Vos 1998;Buchta and Vos

1999;Schomer 1999;Vos and Buchta 2000

Notes: Face-to-face interviews were conducted to compare

the reactions to artillery and road traffic noise.

GER-463 1993-94 Berlin Women Environmental Health

Survey

Date: 1993-1994 (Winter)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Germany: Berlin (2 inner city districts)

N=: 801

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Babisch, Fromme, Beyer, and Ising 1996

Notes: Data were gathered through face-to-face interviews

and various physiological measurements. There

was some evidence in an analysis of a random

subsample that noise is related to neuroendocrine

physiological reactions.

GER-464 Oldenburg Noise Situation Investigation

Date: 1996 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic, Railway, Aircraft (mainly in one area)

Location: Germany: Oldenburg (2 areas)

N=: 40 (approximate)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Nitsch and Schulte-Fortkamp 1997;SchulteFortkamp 1994;Schulte-Fortkamp 1995;SchulteFortkamp 1996;Schulte-Fortkamp 2000

Notes: Semi-structured face-to-face interviews included

some closed questions but primarily open-ended

questions for unstructured descriptions of

experiences with noise. It was concluded that

people form their impressions of noise within

particular contexts defined by activities, location

and particular types of noise events.

GER-465 1996-97 German Sleep Disturbance Survey

Date: 1996 (Spring and Autumn), 1997 (Spring and

Autumn)

Source: Railway, Road traffic

Location: Germany: 8 locations within Northrhein-Westfalia

and Hessen (i.e. two Bundeslanders)

N=: 383 (377 used in the analyses)
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-23-

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griefahn, Deppe, Mehnert, Moog, Möhler, and

Schümer-Kohrs 1998;Griefahn, Deppe, Mehnert,

Moog, Möhler, and Schümer 1998;Griefahn,

Schümer-Kohrs, Schümer, Möhler, and Mehnert

2000

Notes: The participants were recruited using a screening

questionnaire that had been administered to 1703

respondents. The 383 study participants answered

short self-administered questionnaires each

evening and morning for 10 weekday study nights. 

No relationship was found between objectively

measured road and railway noise and body

movements except for the self-identified sensitive

residents living near roads.

GER-466 1998 Düsseldorf/Dortmund Airport Noise

Information Survey

Date: 1998 (February to July), 1999 (May to June for

some reinterviews)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Germany: Düsseldorf International Airport and

Dortmund Regional Airport

N=: 223 responses from 180 respondents (43 were

reinterviewed in 1999)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Vogt and Kastner 1999;Vogt and Kastner 2000

Notes: The initial 180 interviews were conducted in

person. Respondents were then informed about the

airport noise information service. After a year, 43

respondents were reinterviewed via telephone. 

There was not evidence that the existence of the

information service reduced annoyance.

GER-467 1997 ICE High-Speed Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1997 (mid-October to November)

Source: Railway

Location: Germany: along 2 sections of a new high-speed

railway line between Hannover and Wuerzburg (8

small rural communities)

N=: 315

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Zeichart 1999;Zeichart, Kilcher, Herrmann, Hils,

and Gawlik 2000

Notes: Reactions to high speed railway noise are

consistent with that found for standard railway

lines at the same noise exposure.

GER-470 1996-97 German Road/Rail Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1996 (Spring) to 1997 (Autumn)

Source: Railway, Road traffic

Location: Germany: 8 areas (Kreuztal/Hilchenbach, HerbornSeelbach/Herborn-Burg, Bottrop, Langenfeld,

Rheda, Oelde, Bönen, Essen)

N=: 1,600 interviews from 1,121 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griefahn, Möhler, and Schümer 1999;Möhler and

Liepert 2000;Möhler, Liepert, Schümer, and

Griefahn 2000;Möhler, Liepert, Schümer,

Schümer-Kohrs, Schreckenberg, Mehnert, and

Griefahn 2000;Schümer-Kohrs, Schümer,

Schreckenberg, Griefahn, and Möhler 1998

Notes: Some 479 of the 1,121 respondents were

interviewed a second time. Some 377 respondents

participated in a later sleep study (GER-480). Rail

traffic is less annoying than road traffic at the same

noise exposure as measured in LAeq.

GER-471 1995-96 Germany Rail-Grinding Noise Reduction

Study (Pilot)

Date: 1995 (early summer-before grinding), 1995

(Autumn - after grinding), 1996 (repeated in

summer in one location)

Source: Railway (before and after rail grinding to smooth

the rail surface)

Location: Germany: 3 areas along the Munich-RosenheimSalzburg railway line (Vaterstetten, Bernau,

Übersee)

N=: 443 interviews from approximately 194

respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hegner, Möhler, Prestele, and Schümer-Kohrs

1996;Hegner, Möhler, Prestele, and SchümerKohrs 1997;Möhler, Hegner, Schümer, and

Schümer-Kohrs 1997;Schümer and Schreckenberg

2000

Notes: Annoyance was reduced by the reduction in noise

level due to rail grinding. The effect was still

present a year after the change. This study served

as a pilot study for a 1997-98 study (GER-479),

GER-472 1994 1996 Düsseldorf Activity Disturbance Study

Date: 1994, 1996 (part of sample reinterviewed in 1996)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: Germany: Düsseldorf (4 areas: high and low

exposure areas for both aircraft and road traffic)

N=: 3,530 responses from 230 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Felscher-Suhr 1997;Felscher-Suhr, Guski,

Hunecke, Kastka, Paulsen, and Schümer

1996;Felscher-Suhr, Guski, Hunecke, Kastka,

Paulsen, Schümer, and Vogt 1996;Guski 1996

Notes: The study examined the relation between

immediate annoyance and the activity and noise

level during the activity. During the main study,

respondents were called on mobile telephones up to

ten times a day on eight different days over a sixweek period to ask for their location, current
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-24-

activity, and degree of disturbance. The primary study period was

preceded by one face-to-face interview. Two years after the main

study, a structured telephone interview was conducted as well as

a semi-structured face-to-face interview that was tape recorded

and then analyzed.

GER-473 1995 Düsseldorf Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1995 (July to September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Germany: 25 areas in communities near Düsseldorf

airport (Ratingen, Hösel, Lintorf, Homberg,

Breitscheid)

N=: 750 (25 areas)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kastka, Borsch-Galetke, Guski, Krauth, Paulsen,

Schümer, and Oliva 1995;Kastka, Mau, Muth, and

Siegmann 1996

Notes: This survey's results have been compared with

those from the 1987 Düsseldorf Airport Noise

Survey (GER-373).

GER-479 1997-98 Germany Rail-Grinding Noise Reduction

Study (Primary)

Date: 1997 (November, December), 1998 (March, April)

Source: Railway (before and after rail grinding to smooth

the rail surface)

Location: Germany: 3 sites in two areas along the MunichRosenheim-Salzburg railway line

(Burlafingen/Unterfahlheim, Uhingen)

N=: 751 (398 before rail grinding and 353 after)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Liepert, Hegner, Möhler, Schreckenberg, SchümerKohrs, and Schümer 1999

Notes: Annoyance was reduced by the reduction in noise

level due to rail grinding. The methods for this

study had been tested in a pilot survey (GER-471).

GER-480 1996-97 German Road/Rail Sleep Study

Date: 1996 (Spring and Autumn), 1997 (Spring and

Autumn)

Source: Railway, Road traffic

Location: Germany: 8 areas (Kreuztal / Hilchenbach,

Herborn-Seelbach /Herborn-Burg , Bottrop,

Langenfeld, Rheda, Oelde, Bönen, Essen)

N=: 377

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griefahn, Möhler, and Schümer 1999;Möhler and

Liepert 2000;Möhler, Liepert, Schümer, and

Griefahn 2000;Möhler, Liepert, Schümer,

Schümer-Kohrs, Schreckenberg, Mehnert, and

Griefahn 2000

Notes: All 377 respondents had been interviewed in a

previous study (GER-470). A questionnaire was

answered after each night that sleep was

monitored. Rail traffic is less annoying than road

traffic at the same noise exposure as measured in

LAeq.

GER-502 German Noise Change Part of CEC Sleep Study

Date: 1986 Publication (Study date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Germany

N=: 20 sleep study participants drawn from a screening

survey of 240 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griefahn 1988;Griefahn and Gros 1983;Griefahn

and Gros 1985;Griefahn and Gros 1986;Griefahn,

Gros, Kauth, and Rehm 1980;Gros and Griefahn

1985b;Gros and Griefahn 1985a

Notes: On the basis of replies on 240 mail questionnaires,

20 subjects were selected to participate in a 12-

night study in their homes. The 20 participants

filled out short questionnaires on each of the 12

mornings and evenings of the test. A reaction time

test was administered each morning and evening. 

One electroencephalogram (EEG) and two

electrooculograms (EOG) were recorded each

night. Latent effects of noise were found for the

noisy, window-open nights. Only the females,

however, reported a change in sleep quality.

GER-511 1980 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Germany)

Date: 1980

Source: Community

Location: Germany

N=: 457

Noise data: No

Reference: Namba and Kuwano 1986;Namba, Kuwano, and

Schick 1986;Thomas, Namba, Schick, and

Kuwano 1983

Notes: University students answered this written

questionnaire's general statements about neighbors'

noise without direct reference to their present

residence. There are some differences between

perceptions and attitudes toward neighbors' noise

in England, Germany and Japan. The

questionnaire is nearly identical to questionnaires

administered in Japan (JPN-510), England (UKD512), China (CHI-514), and the United States

(USA-513).

GER-516 1983 Apartment Noise Attitudes Study (Germany)

Date: 1983

Source: General community noise including noise from

neighbors in apartments

Location: Germany

N=: 296

Noise data: No
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-25-

Reference: Namba, Kuwano, and Schick 1986;Schick,

Kuwano, and Namba 1984;Schick, Zheng, MüllerAndritzky, Namba, Kuwano, and Chassein 1992

Notes: The study's purpose was to compare Japanese and

German's attitudes toward neighborhood noise

problems. When annoyed by noise from

neighboring apartments, this planned comparison

with a Japanese survey found that Germans are

more likely than Japanese to contact those

neighbors (JPN-516). Data were collected from

university students using a self-administered

questionnaire.

GRE-331 1992 Rhodes Residential Noise Survey

Date: 1992 (Summer)

Source: Community

Location: Greece: Rhodes

N=: 232

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Psichas, Vallet, and Vogiatzis 1993

Notes: Tourists were interviewed with a similar

questionnaire in a non-residential survey.

HKG-125 1975 Hong Kong Fireman Environmental Noise

Survey

Date: 1975 (April to October)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: Hong Kong: 12 fire stations (10 are near Kai Tak

airport)

N=: 522

Noise data: Yes for inside the fire stations

Reference: Ko, Chan, and Kwan 1977;Ko, Kwan, and Chan

1976

Notes: Firemen answered a self-administered

questionnaire. Reactions to both home and fire

station environments were obtained but noise

measures are only available at the fire station. 

Firemen live at the station on alternate days.

HKG-187 Hong Kong Socio-Economic Area Road Traffic

Survey

Date: 1980 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Hong Kong: Two neighborhoods

N=: 180

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Ko and Wong 1980

Notes: Residents in the higher socio-economic

neighborhood are more annoyed by noise at the

same noise level.

HKG-208 Preliminary Hong Kong Fireman Noise Survey

Date: 1975 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic, Aircraft

Location: Hong Kong: Two fire stations

N=: 68

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Ko 1975

Notes: The interviewer translated the questions from

English into Chinese during the interview. A

comparison of these responses with some European

data suggested greater annoyance for these

firemen. The firemen live at the station on

alternate days. This study preceded a larger scale

study (HKG-125).

HUN-458 1995 Hungary Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1995 (July to November), 1999 (November)

(Additional data collection was planned.)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Hungary: 300 locations in 100 towns

N=: 860 (approximate number of responses processed

by 2,000.)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Demeter and Berndt 1996

Notes: The purposes of the study were to determine that

areas were most affected by noise and to aid in

identifying areas for noise insulation.

IRE-254 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study (Ireland)

Date: 1982 (December), 1983 (January to March)

Source: Impulse noise (Shooting range, Shipyard,

Scrapyard, Dairy), Road traffic

Location: Ireland: Kileek, Rushbroke, Ringsend, Blackpool,

Churchtown

N=: 454

Noise data: Yes

Reference: de Jong and Commins 1983;Groeneveld

1986;Groeneveld and de Jong 1984;Groeneveld

and de Jong 1985a;Groeneveld and de Jong

1985b;Hayden, Whelan, and Dillon 1984;Miedema

1987

Notes: This is part of a Commission of European

Communities coordinated joint study in France

(FRA-252), Germany (GER-253), and the

Netherlands (NET-355). The study results support

at least a 10-decibel penalty for impulse noise.

IRN-459 1977 Tehran Community Noise Survey

Date: 1977 (February)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Iran: Tehran (23 sites)

N=: 608 (some households had multiple respondents)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bertlin Cooper McDonald 1977

Notes: Face-to-face interviews were conducted at the door

over a range of noise levels and residential

conditions in Tehran. Residents were bothered by
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-26-

noise in many of the highest and moderate noise exposure areas.

IRQ-229 1980 Baghdad Street Noise Survey

Date: 1980 (Summer)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Iraq: Baghdad

N=: 329 residents and shopkeepers and 360 pedestrians

were interviewed

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Al-Samarrai and Al-Jawadi 1981

Notes: One type of interview was administered to

pedestrians on the streets. Another type was used

for residents and shopkeepers.

ITL-318 1967 Ferrara Comparative Traffic Noise Study

Date: 1967

Source: Road traffic

Location: Italy: Ferrara

N=: 166

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Jonsson, Kajland, Paccagnella, and Sörensen 1969

Notes: This study was designed for comparison to the

1967 Stockholm Comparative Traffic Noise Study

(SWE-025). In spite of a higher traffic noise level

(measured indoors) in the Ferrara sample, those in

the Stockholm sample were more annoyed. The

sample consisted of residents living one story

above street level.

ITL-350 1990 Modena Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1990 (June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Italy: Modena

N=: 908

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bertoni, Franchini, Lambert, Magnoni, Tartoni,

and Vallet 1994;Bertoni, Franchini, Magnoni,

Tartoni, and Vallet 1993

Notes: A series of behavioral effects were found to be

present above 60 dB(A) DNL.

JPN-005 1953 Osaka/Amagasaki Industrial Noise Survey

Date: 1953

Source: Industry

Location: Japan: Osaka, Amagasaki

N=: 136

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Osada 1971;Shoji, Kitamura, Takeuchi, Kitamura,

Hiwatari, Tsuji, and Horiuchi 1953;Yamamoto,

Takagi, Hashimoto, and Yoneda 1970

Notes: Housewives were interviewed.

JPN-018 1965 Osaka Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1965

Source: Aircraft

Location: Japan: 27 sites near Osaka airport

N=: 2,700

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kansai Toshi Soon Talsaku Iinkai 1965;Osada

1971

Notes: Most respondents were housewives.

JPN-046 1970 Yokota Air Base Study

Date: 1970 (July)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Japan: Yokota air base

N=: 991 interviews (from 1,000 households)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kodama 1971;Osada 1971;Rylander, Sörensen,

and Berglund 1974;Tokyoto Kogai Kenkyujo

1971;Tokyoto Kogai Kenkyujo 1972

Notes: Housewives were interviewed.

JPN-062 1972 Akishima City Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Japan: Ten areas in Akishima City near Yokota air

base

N=: Approximately 1,000

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hayashi, Hayashi, Kodama, and Kondo

1973;Hayashi, Kondo, and Kodama 1974;Hayashi,

Kondo, and Kodama 1978;Kondo, Hayashi, and

Kodama 1975;Kondo, Hayashi, and Kodama 1978

Notes: The Psychological Assessment of Aircraft Noise

Index (PANNI) is described.

JPN-064 1972 Environmental Agency of Japan Shinkansen

Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (November)

Source: High speed railway

Location: Japan: The New Tokaido Shinkansen Line

N=: 968

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Environmental Agency of Japan 1973;Kumagai,

Kono, Sone, and Nimura 1975;Nimura, Sone, and

Kono 1981

Notes: Residents are the equivalent of five decibels more

annoyed near the high-speed Shinkansen lines than

near four regular railway lines (JPN-101).

JPN-065 1972 New Tokaido and New Sanyo Shinkansen

Railway Noise

Date: 1972 (July)

Source: High speed railway

Location: Japan: The New Tokaido and New Sanyo

Shinkansen railway routes

N=: 424
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-27-

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kaku 1994;Nimura, Sone, Ebata, and Matsumato

1975;Nimura, Sone, and Kono 1973;Nimura,

Sone, and Kono 1981;Sone, Kono, Nimura,

Kameyama, and Kumagai 1973;Takeshita 1984

Notes: The study compares reactions to a newly opened

route (four months old) and a more established

route (eight years old).

JPN-094 1973-74 Sendai Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1973 (December), 1974 (January)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Sendai City (20 areas)

N=: 939

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Shibuya, Tanno, Sone, and Nimura 1975

Notes: Demographic and neighborhood characteristics

that affect road traffic noise annoyance are studied.

JPN-101 1974 Sendai City Regular Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1974

Source: Railway

Location: Japan: Sendai City

N=: 717

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kumagai, Kono, Sone, and Nimura 1975;Nimura,

Sone, and Kono 1981

Notes: Residents are the equivalent of five-decibels less

annoyed near four regular railways than at similar

noise levels in a high-speed Shinkansen noise

study (JPN-064).

JPN-123 1975 Yokohama Road/Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1975 (October to December)

Source: Railway, Road traffic

Location: Japan: Yokohama

N=: 356 (1975)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Tamura 1978;Tamura and Gotoh 1977

Notes: Another survey was carried out in this area in

1976.

JPN-138 1976 Kanagawa Ward Community Noise Survey

Date: 1976 (October, November)

Source: Community

Location: Japan: Kanagawa Ward in Yokohama

N=: 427

Noise data: No noise data described in available English

publication

Reference: Tamura and Gotoh 1980

Notes: None

JPN-139 1976 Japanese Road/Railway Noise Study

Date: 1976 (December)

Source: Road traffic, Railway

Location: Japan

N=: 372

Noise data: No noise data described in available English

publication

Reference: Tamura and Gotoh 1980

Notes: None

JPN-140 1977 Camp Fuji Noise Survey

Date: 1977 (October, November)

Source: Road traffic, Community, Artillery

Location: Japan: Area around Camp Fuji

N=: 342

Noise data: No noise data described in available English

publication

Reference: Tamura and Gotoh 1980

Notes: None

JPN-152 1977 Atugi Military Aircraft Noise Study

Date: 1977 (November, December)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Japan: Residential areas surrounding Atugi Base

N=: 345

Noise data: No noise data described in available English

publication

Reference: Tamura and Gotoh 1980

Notes: None

JPN-163 1972 Itami City Osaka Airport Noise Study

Date: 1972 (November) to 1973 (January)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Japan: Osaka Airport

N=: 1,209

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Aircraft Nuisance Prevention Assoc. 1973;Itami

City Airport Noise Pollution Abatement Agency

1973

Notes: None

JPN-177 1978 Kanagawa Ward Community Noise Survey

Date: 1978 (October, November)

Source: Community

Location: Japan: Kanagawa Ward in Yokohama

N=: 387

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Tamura and Gotoh 1980

Notes: None

JPN-190 1956 Kyoto Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1956

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Kyoto

N=: 956

Noise data: Yes
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-28-

Reference: Aoki 1959;Osada 1971

Notes: Questionnaires were left at households and later

collected.

JPN-201 1975 Shinkansen Railway Survey

Date: 1975 (March)

Source: Railway

Location: Japan: Shinkansen line in Nagoya City

N=: 1,187

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Yamanaka 1982

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were used. 

Questions concerned only health. Community

noise was not explicitly rated. Some of the 190

indicators of poor health were related to noise and

vibration levels.

JPN-271 Japan Three-Site Construction Noise Survey

Date: 1984 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Construction

Location: Japan: Abiko City, Tuchiura City, Misato City

N=: 689

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sakai 1984

Notes: Construction noise annoyance was less in the area

with a higher ambient noise level.

JPN-292 1984 Sapporo City Traffic Noise and Vibration

Survey

Date: 1984 (September, October)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Sapporo City (8 high vibration areas, 5 low

vibration areas)

N=: 219

Noise data: Yes: noise and vibration data

Reference: Sato 1988;Sato 1993;Sato 1994

Notes: Respondents are more annoyed by the same level of

traffic noise in areas where there is greater

vibration. The measured vibration levels are

correlated with vibration annoyance. These data

are combined in some publications with data from

two other surveys (JPN-341, JPN-447).

JPN-293 Osaka Aircraft and Environmental Noise Survey

Date: 1987 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Aircraft, Community

Location: Japan: Areas near Osaka International Airport

including Northern Osaka, Sennan, Wakayama,

and Awaji

N=: 6,080 from 58 areas

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hiramatsu, Takagi, Yamamoto, and Yano 1987

Notes: Both aircraft noise and environmental noise affect

ratings of aircraft noise.

JPN-294 Nagoya City 1980s Cumulative Noise Survey

Date: 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1987, 1988

Source: Community, Road traffic

Location: Japan: Nagoya City

N=: over 2,000 responses (as of 1998 publication)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hayashi 1987;Hayashi 2000;Hayashi, Kuno,

Mishina, and Ikegaya 1987;Hayashi, Kuno, Oishi,

Mishina, and Ikegaya 1988;Izumi 1988;Kuno et al.

1987;Kuno, Hayashi, Oishi, and Mishina

1988;Kuno, Noro, Oishi, Mishina, and Hayashi

1997;Kuno, Ohara, Takeda, and Mishina

1986;Kuno, Oishi, Hayashi, Mishina, and Ikegaya

1985 Kuno, Oishi, Mishina, Hayashi, Zheng, Cai,

and Chen 1992;Kuno, Oishi, Mishina, Hayashi,

Zheng, Cai, and Chen 1993;Kuno, Omiya,

Mishina, Oishi, and Hayashi 1996;Kuno, Omiya,

Okumura, Hayashi, Mishina, and Oishi

2000;Kuno, Zheng, Takeda, Ikegaya, and Mishina

1984;Oishi, Mishina, Hayashi, Okumura, and

Kuno 1989;Omiya, Kuno, Mishina, Oishi,

Hayashi, and Okumura 1998;Omiya, Kuno,

Mishina, Oishi, and Hayashi 1997

Notes: Additional noise measurement locations and

interviews were added at several times since the

first survey in 1982. Residents in residential areas

are slightly more annoyed by the same noise level

than are residents in predominant industrial or

commercial areas.

JPN-319 1989 Muroran Road/Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1989 (June 28 to July 24), 1990 (July 9-19)

Source: Road traffic, Railway

Location: Japan: Muroran City

N=: 204 in 1989, 166 in 1990

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Izumi and Yano 1990;Takahashi 1991

Notes: Road traffic annoyance is affected by the presence

of railway noise but railway noise annoyance is not

affected by the presence of road traffic noise. The

1990 questionnaire was answered by 166 of the

204 respondents from 1989. In both years,

questionnaires were mailed to respondents who

subsequently provided their answers in telephone

interviews.

JPN-326 1991 Muroran Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1991 (September, October)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Muroran City

N=: 96

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Dankittikul, Izumi, Yano, Kurosawa, and

Yamashita 1993
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-29-

Notes: A self-administered questionnaire was delivered by

staff who later collected it. A comparison with a

Thai survey (THA-327) found strong cross-cultural

similarities.

JPN-340 1983 Tokyo Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1983 (November)

Source: Railway

Location: Japan: 15 sites in Tokyo along 10 railway lines

N=: 830

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Nakamura 1985;Nakamura, Uehara, and Imaizumi

1985;Nakamura and Yoshida 1990;Yoshida and

Nakamura 1988b;Yoshida and Nakamura

1988a;Yoshida and Nakamura 1994;Yoshida and

Nakamura 1989;Yoshida, Tokuyama, and

Nakamura 1994

Notes: The residents' annoyance is compared to the

annoyance in four other railway noise surveys.

JPN-341 1989 Sapporo Traffic Noise/Vibration Survey

Date: 1989 (September to November)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Sapporo

N=: 99

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sato 1993;Sato 1994

Notes: These data are combined in some publications with

data from two other surveys (JPN-292, JPN-447). 

The effect on noise annoyance of about 10 decibels

in vibration exposure (dBVL) is equal to about 3.5

dB(A) LAeq in noise exposure.

JPN-343 1990-93 Tokyo Five-Area Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1990 (October, 1st area), 1992 (August; 2nd, 3rd

areas), 1993 (August-October; 4th, 5th areas)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Tokyo (five areas in and around Tokyo)

N=: 1,181

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Ishiyama 1993;Ishiyama 1995

Notes: Road noise was the most serious environmental

problem for residents near main roads.

JPN-353 1992 Chatan Town Kadena Air Base Survey

Date: 1993 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Military airport

Location: Japan: area near a U.S. air base on Okinawa

(Chatan Town)

N=: 1,053

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hiramatsu, Minoura, Matsui, Miyakita, Osada, and

Yamamoto 2000;Hiramatsu, Yamamoto, Taira, Ito,

and Nakasone 1993;Ito, Hiramatsu, Taira,

Nakasone, and Yamamoto 1994;Miyakita et al.

1998a;Yamamoto 1999

Notes: A self-administered health survey was collected

from respondents.

JPN-358 Central Tokyo Combined Residential and Personal

Noise Survey

Date: 1988 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Neighborhood

Location: Japan: Central Tokyo

N=: 147

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kono and Sone 1988

Notes: Noise was measured outdoors at the residence and

on the person of the respondent by a personal

device for 24 hours a day. All respondents were

either housewives or worked at home. General

road traffic annoyance and speech and

conversation interference were predicted better by

the environmental noise than by the personal noise

exposures.

JPN-369 1996 Kumamoto Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1996 (May-July)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Kumamoto City (15 areas)

N=: 837 (378 in detached houses; 459 in apartments)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sato, Yano, Björkman, and Rylander 2000;Sato,

Yano, Yamashita, Kawai, Rylander, Björkman,

and Öhrström 1998a;Sato, Yano, Yamashita,

Kawai, Rylander, Björkman, and Öhrström

1998b;Yano, Murakami, Kawai, and Sato

1998;Yano, Sato, Björkman, and Rylander

2000;Yano, Sato, Kawai, and Kurosawa 1997

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were completed. 

Indoor activity disturbance was similar in

Kumamoto, Japan and Gothenburg, Sweden

(SWE-368) for similar noise exposures, but

outdoor activity disturbance was greater in

Gothenburg (SWE-368). Exhaust fume

evaluations are related to noise evaluations.

JPN-370 1994-95 Kyushu Railway Survey

Date: 1994 (May, June, September, January), 1995

(May)

Source: Railway

Location: Japan: Kyushu Prefecture (including Kumamoto

and Fukuoka)

N=: 1,828

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Yano, Izumi, Yamashita, and Tabata 1997;Yano,

Murakami, Kawai, and Sato 1998;Yano, Sato,

Kawai, and Kurosawa 1997;Yano, Yamashita, and
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-30-

Izumi 1996;Yano, Yamashita, and Izumi 1997

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were completed. 

A comparison with methodologically similar

Japanese road traffic surveys found that reactions

to railway noise and road traffic noise were similar

at the same noise levels. Responses were measured

and compared for four types of annoyance scales.

JPN-376 1971-77 Chiba Multi-Family Dwelling Survey

Date: 1971, 1974 to 1977

Source: Interior (apartment buildings)

Location: Japan: Chiba area near Tokyo (Multiple buildings

in 17 housing developments)

N=: 3,765

Noise data: Yes: Some information about neighbor noise

measured in 13 vacant apartments

Reference: Mitsuda and Kimura 1980

Notes: TNEL is recommended as a noise exposure

measure for noise from neighbors. Most of the

noise annoyance was directed at the apartment

above the respondent.

JPN-377 1992-95 Tokyo Multi-Family Dwelling Study

Date: 1992-1995

Source: Interior (apartment buildings)

Location: Japan: Tokyo, Saitama and Chiba Prefectures

N=: 3,294

Noise data: Yes: attenuation to overhead apartment estimated

Reference: Kimura, Inoue, So, and Fujisawa 1994;So and

Kimura 1998;So, Kimura, and Inoue 1995;So,

Kimura, and Inoue 1996;So, Kimura, and Kaji

1998;So, Kimura, Kaji, and Suzuki 1996;So,

Kimura, Suzuki, and Kaji 1997

Notes: A self-administered questionnaire was left at

homes where attempts were made to contact

inhabitants. Inhabitants of both public and private

housing participated. Reactions were related to the

estimated attenuation of the floor above an

apartment and to the size of the family in the

overhead apartment.

JPN-382 1997-98 Sapporo Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1997 (October) - 1998 (October)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Sapporo

N=: 780

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Murase, Sato, Yano, Björkman, Rylander, and

Dankittikul 2000;Sato, Murase, Yano, Björkman,

Rylander, and Dankittikul 2000;Sato, Yano,

Björkman, and Rylander 2000;Yano, Sato,

Björkman, and Rylander 2000

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were distributed

and then collected from each address. Respondents

living in the colder Sapporo area and the warmer

Kumamoto area (JPN-369) are equally annoyed by

road traffic at the same noise level. Respondents in

detached houses in Sweden (SWE-368) are more

annoyed.

JPN-438 1991 Fukuoka Green Areas Noise Survey

Date: 1991 (June)

Source: Community

Location: Japan: Fukuoka City (8 residential areas that

include 18 parks)

N=: 624 used in reported analyses

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Fujimoto 1991;Fujimoto 1993;Fujimoto

1994;Imamura, Fujimoto, Kim, and Nakamura

1991;Kim, Fujimoto, Imamura, and Nakamura

1991

Notes: The study primarily focused on residents' feelings

about a park in the residential area but also asked

about reactions to noise at their home. The selfadministered questionnaire was mailed but then

personally collected.

JPN-439 1992 Fukuoka Green Areas Survey

Date: 1992 (November)

Source: Natural sounds heard in daily life

Location: Japan: Fukuoka City (8 neighborhoods)

N=: 711

Noise data: No

Reference: Kim and Fujimoto 1994

Notes: Respondents answered a self-administered

questionnaire to describe their evaluation of the

residential environment and green spaces in the

neighborhood.

JPN-440 1984 Fukuoka Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1984 (September)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Fukuoka city (27 sites along main roads and

3 sites in other residential areas)

N=: 1,286 used in analyses

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fujimoto 1991;Fujimoto 1994;Fujimoto, Haruta,

and Sakata 1986;Izumi 1988

Notes: The Japanese respondents appear to give a more

negative response to road traffic noise than would

be expected from studies in other countries.

JPN-441 1987 Fukuoka Railway Crossing Noise Survey

Date: 1987 (October)

Source: Railway trains, Railway crossing alarms

Location: Japan: Fukuoka City (30 areas)

N=: 571 (555 used in some analyses)

Noise data: No
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-31-

Reference: Fujimoto 1991;Fujimoto 1994;Fujimoto and Haruta

1988;Haruta and Fujimoto 1988

Notes: The self-administered questionnaires were handdelivered to residents living near railway crossings. 

Respondents disliked the sound of railway crossing

alarms.

JPN-442 1987 Fukuoka 19-Area Community Noise Survey

Date: 1987 (December)

Source: Community

Location: Japan: Fukuoka city

N=: 1,034 (parents of students in 19 elementary

schools)

Noise data: No

Reference: Fujimoto 1991;Fujimoto 1994

Notes: Parents of fifth grade students were given selfadministered questionnaires to report their

impressions of sounds heard in daily life at their

residences.

JPN-443 1993 Fukuoka 12-Area Community Noise Survey

Date: 1993 (May)

Source: Community

Location: Japan: Fukuoka City (12 areas)

N=: 1,248 (1,074 used in some analyses)

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Furuya, Fujimoto, and Haruta 1994

Notes: This self-administered questionnaire was used to

investigate respondents' feelings about their

residential environments.

JPN-444 1996-97 Kadena/Futenma Military Aircraft Noise

Survey

Date: 1996 (November) - 1997 (March)

Source: Aircraft (Conventional aircraft at Kadena with

more helicopters at Futenma)

Location: Japan: Okinawa (municipalities in the vicinity of

Kadena and Futenma U.S. airfields, control area in

Shimajiri district)

N=: 5,693 (3,560 from Kadena, 1,448 from Futenma,

685 from Shimajiri)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hiramatsu, Minoura, Matsui, Miyakita, Taira,

Osada, and Yamamoto 1998a;Hiramatsu, Minoura,

Matsui, Miyakita, Taira, Osada, and Yamamoto

1998b;Matsui, Nakada, Hiramatsu, Taira, Osada,

and Yamamoto 1998;Minoura, Matsui, Miyakita,

Taira, Hiramatsu, Osada, and Yamamoto

1998;Miyakita et al. 1998b;Tokuyama et al.

1998;Yamamoto 1999

Notes: The self-administered questionnaire was left at

residences and later picked up by the researchers. 

Most of the respondents had participated in an

earlier health survey (JPN-445).

JPN-445 1995-96 Kadena General Health Questionnaire

Survey

Date: 1995 (November) - 1996 (September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Japan: Okinawa (municipalities in the vicinity of

Kadena and Futenma U.S. airfields, control area in

Shimajiri district)

N=: 6,480 (combined with an additional 615 from study

JPN-353 in some analyses)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hiramatsu et al. 1998;Hiramatsu, Minoura,

Matsui, Miyakita, Taira, Osada, and Yamamoto

1998b;Hiramatsu, Minoura, Matsui, Miyakita,

Taira, Osada, and Yamamoto 1998a;Matsui,

Nakada, Hiramatsu, Taira, Osada, and Yamamoto

1998;Miyakita et al. 1998a;Yamamoto 1999

Notes: The self-administered questionnaire primarily

addressed health issues. Some of the respondents

were later included in a standard noise annoyance

survey (JPN-444). It was left at residences and

later picked up by the researchers. The study

concluded that residents near the airfield may

experience both physical and mental effects from

aircraft noise.

JPN-446 1994 Sapporo Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1994 (April - October)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Sapporo (4 residential areas)

N=: 260

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sato, Yamashita, Yano, and Kurosawa 1997

Notes: Respondents in detached houses were more

annoyed by the same noise than those in apartment

houses. Respondents completed self-administered

questionnaires.

JPN-447 1990 Sapporo Traffic Noise and Vibration Survey

Date: 1990 (September - November)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Sapporo

N=: 266

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sato 1993;Sato 1994

Notes: These data are combined in some publications with

data from two other surveys (JPN-292, JPN-341). 

A 10-decibel difference in vibration exposure

(dBVL) has about the same effect on annoyance as

a 3.5 LAeq, dB(A) difference in noise exposure.

JPN-448 1987 Sapporo Railway Noise and Vibration Survey

Date: 1987 (September to November)

Source: Railway

Location: Japan: Sapporo (This and a related survey (JPN-
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-32-

449) together covered 37 blocks in 13 areas

along 3 railways.)

N=: 154 (combined with 96 from survey JPN-449 in

some analyses)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sato 1994

Notes: This interview is similar to that used in another

railway survey (JPN-449).

JPN-449 1991 Sapporo Railway Noise and Vibration Survey

Date: 1991 (September - November)

Source: Railway

Location: Japan: Sapporo (This and a related survey (JNP448) together covered 37 blocks in 13 areas along

3 railways.)

N=: 96 (combined with 154 from survey JPN-448 in

some analyses)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sato 1994

Notes: This interview is similar to that used in another

railway survey (JPN-448).

JPN-450 1995-96 Kyushu Expressway Survey

Date: 1995 (June) - 1996 (October)

Source: Expressway (Kyushu Highway)

Location: Japan: Kumamoto Prefecture (Kumamoto City,

Kikuyo, Mishigoshi, Ueki, Kikusui)

N=: 387 (212 from sites with noise barriers, 175

without barriers)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Yano, Kurosawa, and Kawai 1997

Notes: Annoyance was lower at noise-barrier sites than at

non-barrier sites with the same noise exposure. 

The self-administered questionnaires were

distributed and collected at respondents' homes by

the researchers.

JPN-451 1993 Kumamoto Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1993 (September, October)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Kumamoto (3 sites)

N=: 155

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Yano, Izumi, Rylander, and Bjorkman 1994

Notes: The annoyance reactions were similar for all selfadministered questionnaires whether distributed by

mail or by hand with personal collection. 

Annoyance was lower at the same noise exposure

than that previously observed in a Gothenburg,

Sweden survey (SWE-420).

JPN-452 1993 Tomakomai Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1993 (July)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: A major road in Tomokomai (Hokkaido

district))

N=: 268 (184 were screened by a belt of trees)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Izumi, Dankittikul, Yamashita, and Yano

1994;Yamashita, Yano, and Izumi 1996

Notes: Reactions to noise for the same noise exposure

were less when the road was screened by trees. 

Comparisons with a Thai survey (THA-327) found

strong cross-cultural similarities. Selfadministered questionnaires were completed.

JPN-453 1988-1990 Hokkaido/Kyushu Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1988 (September, October), 1989 (September,

October), 1990 (March to May, October,

November)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Hokkaido District (Muroran, Asahikawa,

Noboribetsu) and Kumamoto

N=: 348

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Izumi and Yano 1991;Izumi, Yano, and Yamashita

1992;Yano, Izumi, Yamashita, Dankittikul, and

Kurosawa 1993;Yano, Yamashita, and Izumi

1991a;Yano, Yamashita, and Izumi 1991b

Notes: This survey was planned for a comparison to a

Gothenburg survey (SWE-420) that has not yet

been reported and another Muroran Japan survey

(JPN-319). Reactions are about the same to at

similar noise levels in warm and cold areas of

Japan.

JPN-491 1996 Osaka International Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1996 (January)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Japan: Osaka International Airport (10 areas)

N=: 215 (148 questionnaires under takeoff paths and

67 under landing paths)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Yamada 2000;Yamada and Kaku 1996

Notes: The amount of annoyance with aircraft noise was

reported to be similar to 25 years earlier, even after

a decrease in noise exposure. Questionnaires were

distributed by mail.

JPN-492 1991 Yokohama Sound Environment Survey

Date: 1991 (October - December)

Source: Overall sound environment

Location: Japan: Yokohama City

N=: 1,240

Noise data: No

Reference: Kashima, Tamura, Shima, and Sawada

1994;Tamura 1998

Notes: Residents like to hear natural sounds. Mail
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-33-

questionnaires were used with two follow up

mailings.

JPN-493 1985-86 Shinkansen/Conventional Rail Noise

Survey

Date: 1985 to 1986

Source: High speed and standard railway

Location: Japan: Kanagawa Prefecture (12 areas)

N=: 613

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Tamura 1994

Notes: The Shinkansen (high speed train) is viewed more

negatively than ordinary railways. Respondents

completed self-administered questionnaires. In the

following year, 55 of the respondents were

interviewed at length with open-ended questions.

JPN-494 1987 Odawara Sound Environment Survey

Date: 1987 (September)

Source: Overall sound environment

Location: Japan: 8 areas in Odawara city (Kanagawa

Prefecture)

N=: 136

Noise data: No

Reference: Shima and Tamura 1993

Notes: Most of the self-administered questionnaire

focused on sounds, including positive sounds. 

Road traffic was often mentioned as a sound heard

at home.

JPN-495 1984 Nagoya Neighborhood Noise Survey

Date: 1985

Source: Neighborhood

Location: Japan: Nagoya city

N=: 1,200

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Oishi, Mishina, Hayashi, Okumura, and Kuno

1989

Notes: The study examined the awareness of noise in

neighborhoods of Nagoya with face-to-face

interviews.

JPN-496 1994-96 Tokyo Trunk Road Noise Survey

Date: 1994 to 1996

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Tokyo (5 areas along 3 trunk roads)

N=: 1,880

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hoshiyama, Kawaguchi, Yoshida, Yamamoto,

Chiba, and Osada 1998;Osada, Yoshida, Yoshida,

Kawaguchi, Hoshiyama, and Yamamoto

1997;Yoshida, Osada, Kawaguchi, Hoshiyama,

Yoshida, and Yamamoto 1997

Notes: A dose-response relationship was found for noise

level with annoyance, but not with illness. The

questionnaire was mailed and then collected by

appointment at homes.

JPN-497 1992 Itabashi Tokyo Environmental Complaints

Survey

Date: 1992 (Began in April, end date not reported))

Source: Industry

Location: Japan: Itabashi City (Tokyo area) a city with a high

concentration of industry

N=: 150 (approximate)

Noise data: No

Reference: Oi, Suga, and Kondoh 1994

Notes: A postal questionnaire that included open-ended

questions was sent to residents, including new

residents, who had complained about noise in an

area that is changing from a predominant

industrial area to a mixed residential-industrial

area. For 80 complaints, the case was discussed

with the government official who processed the

complaint.

JPN-498 1988-91 Setagaya Tokyo Environmental

Complaints Survey

Date: 1988 (October) to 1991 (April)

Source: Community

Location: Japan: Setagaya City (Tokyo area)

N=: 136

Noise data: No

Reference: Suga, Oi, Kondoh, and Miyamoto 1994

Notes: Respondents completed a postal questionnaire that

included open-ended questions. A cluster analysis

was conducted of the words that 118 of the

respondents used to describe their problems.

JPN-499 Tokyo Four-Area Nighttime Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1994 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic (nighttime)

Location: Japan: Tokyo (4 areas)

N=: 1,145 (1,037 questionnaires were used in analysis

because 117 respondents reported hearing

problems)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kabuto and Kageyama 1994

Notes: The study inquired about sleep quality with a

postal questionnaire. Some 198 respondents wore

a sound exposure meter for 24 hours.

JPN-500 1999 Osaka Aircraft Noise and Health Survey

Date: 1999 (April-June)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Japan: Osaka (areas at 3 noise levels under

landing operations)

N=: 390
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-34-

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Goto, Kaneko, and Tokita 2000

Notes: None

JPN-501 1985 Kawasaki Life-Related Noise Survey

Date: 1985 (October)

Source: Neighbors' equipment or voices

Location: Japan: Kawasaki City (Tokyo area)

N=: 2,000 (approximate)

Noise data: No

Reference: Suzuki 1994

Notes: About half the respondents reported that they had

experienced some annoyance from neighbors'

appliances, audio equipment, vehicles or other

neighbor noises. Respondents were often aware

that their audio equipment could be annoying but

relatively unaware that their car or pet's sound

could be annoying. The type of questionnaire is

not identified in the report.

JPN-503 1986 Tokyo Main-Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1986 (November 6-23)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Japan: Tokyo

N=: 176 (an additional 5 responses were not analyzed)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Yoshida 1987;Yoshida 1991;Yoshida and

Nakamura 1994;Yoshida, Tokuyama, and

Nakamura 1994

Notes: Face-to-face interviews were conducted

JPN-504 1987 Tokyo Side Streets Noise Survey

Date: 1987 (October, November)

Source: Road traffic in narrow roads

Location: Japan: Tokyo

N=: 1,000 (Subsets of 376 or 885 have been used in

some publications)

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Kuga 1989;Nakamura and Yoshida 1990;Yoshida

1991;Yoshida and Nakamura 1994;Yoshida,

Tokuyama, and Nakamura 1994

Notes: Some mixed evidence suggests a relationship

between noise and mental health problems. Faceto-face interviews were conducted.

JPN-505 1993 Osaka Free-Response Industrial Noise Survey

Date: 1993 (August)

Source: All sources of sounds or noise

Location: Japan: Sakai city (Osaka area)

N=: 308

Noise data: No

Reference: Minoura and Hiramatsu 2000;Minoura, Hiramatsu,

Matsui, Takagi, and Oi 1997

Notes: Respondents were asked to write a free response to

an open question about sounds in their house and

neighborhood.

JPN-506 1980s Yomahoko Community Noise Survey

Date: 1988 and five other years (Most data from the

months of July and August)

Source: Road traffic, Festivals and other community noise

Location: Japan: Kyoto (8 areas in Yamohoko-cho)

N=: 223

Noise data: No

Reference: Hiramatsu and Minoura 2000

Notes: The study examined how residents' responses

varied with their connection to the sound source. 

The self-administered questionnaires were left at

the home and later picked up by the research team.

JPN-507 1996 Nishijin Textile Neighborhood Noise Survey

Date: 1996 (August, September)

Source: Community

Location: Japan: Nishijin area of Kyoto

N=: 208

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Minoura and Hiramatsu 1998;Minoura and

Hiramatsu 2000

Notes: Respondents answered free-response, selfadministered questionnaires that asked for their

description of the present and past sound

environments in a traditional textile production

area in Kyoto, Japan. Residents with experience in

textiles more often mention textile industry sounds.

JPN-508 Toyonaka City Free-Response Noise Survey

Date: 2000 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Any community sounds

Location: Japan: Toyonaka City

N=: 176

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Minoura and Hiramatsu 2000

Notes: Residents in apartments were asked to describe

their sound environment with unstructured

questions in a self-administered questionnaire.

JPN-509 1972-81 Kyushu Airport Opening Survey

Date: 1972 to 1981(Cooler months from October to

March)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Japan: 3 airports in Kyushu (Nagasaki,

Kagoshima, Oita)

N=: 9,819 (Kagoshima, 6,654; Oita, 1,539; Nagasaki,

1,626)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Miyahara 1988

Notes: Questionnaire surveys were conducted in two or

three different years at each airport at intervals of
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-35-

one to 11 years after the airports had opened. 

All respondents had lived in the areas before

the airports opened. The purpose was to

determine if reactions changed over time after

introducing aircraft. Questionnaires were

distributed to residents and then personally

collected.

JPN-510 1980s Student Noise Attitudes Study (Japan)

Date: 1980, (also 5 data collection periods between 1981

to 1985 and/or 1986)

Source: Community

Location: Japan: Osaka area

N=: 894 (434 in first year)

Noise data: No

Reference: Florentine, Namba, and Kuwano 1986;Izumi

1988;Namba and Kuwano 1986;Thomas, Namba,

Schick, and Kuwano 1983

Notes: University students answered this written

questionnaire's general statements about neighbors'

noise without direct reference to their present

residence. There are some differences between

perceptions and attitudes toward neighbors' noise

in England, Germany and Japan. The

questionnaire is nearly identical to questionnaires

administered in England (UKD-512), Germany

(GER-511), China (CHI-514), and the United

States (USA-513).

JPN-515 1983 Apartment Noise Attitudes Study (Japan)

Date: 1983

Source: General community noise including noise from

neighbors in apartments

Location: Japan: Osaka area

N=: 375

Noise data: No

Reference: Namba, Kuwano, and Schick 1986;Schick,

Kuwano, and Namba 1984;Schick, Zheng, MüllerAndritzky, Namba, Kuwano, and Chassein 1992

Notes: The study's purpose was to compare Japanese and

German's attitudes toward neighborhood noise

problems. When annoyed by noise from

neighboring apartments, this planned comparison

with a German survey found that Japanese are less

likely than Germans to contact those neighbors

(GER-515). Data were collected from university

students using a self-administered questionnaire.

JPN-517 1990, 1995 Japanese/English Questionnaire

Testing Study (Osaka)

Date: 1990, 1995 (February, November)

Source: community

Location: Japan: Kansai region

N=: 621

Noise data: No

Reference: Kuwano, Namba, and Florentine 1996

Notes: This questionnaire was developed for broad use by

the Acoustical society of Japan and administered

on a test basis in this study and one study in the

United States (USA-518).

KOR-295 1987 Seoul Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1987 (February)

Source: Road Traffic

Location: Korea: Seoul

N=: 351 (144 industrial area, 207 residential area)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Yu 1987;Yu 1988

Notes: Interviews were conducted with residents in both a

residential and an industrial area.

KOR-475 1980s Seoul Multiple-Source Noise Survey

Date: 1985 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic, Railway

Location: Korea: Seoul (3 residential areas.)

N=: 646 (only 197 used in some reports)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lee 1985;Lee, Lee, and Cha 1985

Notes: Responses are affected more by noise level than by

the measured personal variables.

NET-002 1950 Netherlands Sound Insulation Effects Study

Date: 1950 (April to July)

Source: Neighbors in apartment buildings

Location: Netherlands: Rotterdam, The Hague

N=: Approximately 1,215

Noise data: Yes: sound insulation information

Reference: Bitter and Horch 1958;Bitter and van Weeren

1955;van den Eijk, Kasteleijn, and Kosten 1956

Notes: None

NET-013 1963 Schiphol Airport Survey

Date: 1963 (August, September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Netherlands: Eight areas around Schiphol airport

N=: 1,000

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bitter 1970;Bitter 1972;Bitter and Schwager

1964;de Jong 1981f;de Jong 1981d;de Jong

1983a;Kosten, de Zwaan, Steenbergen,

Falkenhagen, de Jonge, and van Os 1967;Rylander,

Sörensen, and Berglund 1974

Notes: This survey supported early Dutch aircraft noise

regulations.

NET-106 1974 Dordrecht Home Sound Insulation Study

Date: 1974 (April) and 1976 (April)

Source: Highway Traffic
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-36-

Location: Netherlands: Dordrecht (Highway 16)

N=: 383 (before insulation), and 376 (after insulation)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bitter 1979b;Bitter 1979a;Bitter, Kaper, and

Pinkse 1978;de Jong 1983b;van Dongen 1981a;van

Dongen 1982

Notes: The study compares two sound insulation

situations: one before noise abatement; the second,

two years after noise insulation measures were

installed in the homes as a result of residents'

strong opposition to changes in nearby road traffic. 

The study was designed for comparison with a

similar later study (NET-238).

NET-115 1975 Schiphol/Marssum Aircraft Noise Insulation

Survey

Date: 1975 (September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Netherlands: Five areas around Schiphol and one

area (Marssum) near Leeuwarden Military Airfield

N=: 434 (376,Schiphol) (58, Marssum)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bitter 1980;Bitter and Willigers 1979;de Jong

1981d;de Jong 1981f;de Jong 1983a;Lingen and

Voorn 1979;Willigers 1979

Notes: The noise annoyance relationship had not changed

since the 1963 Schiphol survey (NET-013). The

survey preceded sound insulation installation and

can be compared with a post-insulation survey

(NET-149). The survey occurred during an

unusually warm summer.

NET-149 1977 Schiphol/Marssum Sound Insulation Survey

Date: 1977 (September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Netherlands: Five areas around Schiphol and one

area (Marssum) around Leeuwarden Military

Airfield

N=: 353 (304, Schiphol) (49, Marssum)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bitter 1980;Bitter and Willigers 1979;de Jong

1981f;de Jong 1981d;Lingen and Voorn

1979;Willigers 1979

Notes: Interviews followed the installation of sound

insulation in the same areas as a 1975 study (NET115).

NET-153 1977 Netherlands Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1977 (October)

Source: Railway

Location: Netherlands: (12 locations)

N=: 671

Noise data: Yes: inside and outside

Reference: de Jong 1979a;de Jong 1983b;de Jong and

Miedema 1996;de Jong and Peeters 1983;de Jong

and Tukker 1983;Peeters 1981;Peeters, de Jong,

Kaper, and Tukker 1984

Notes: Inside noise measurements were made as well as

outside measurements but did not correlate more

highly with annoyance.

NET-193 1976 Netherlands Military Airfields Noise Study

Date: 1976 (August, September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Netherlands: areas near three military airfields

(Soesterberg, Twente, Volkel)

N=: 867

Noise data: Yes

Reference: de Jong 1980a;de Jong 1981f;de Jong 1983a;de

Jong and Beers 1980c;de Jong and Groeneveld

1983

Notes: This study is designed for comparison to three

other studies: Schiphol, 1963 (NET-013);

Schiphol/Marssum, 1975 (NET-115); 

Schiphol/Marssum, 1977 (NET-149).

NET-194 1976 Netherlands Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1976 (October)

Source: Railway

Location: Netherlands: 9 locations (5 near railways, 2 near

tramways, and 2 near metro-tramways)

N=: 65 (45 near railways, 10 near tramways, 10 near

metro-tramways)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: de Jong 1977a;de Jong 1977b

Notes: Open, unstructured interviews were conducted as

part of the planning for a larger railway survey

(NET-153).

NET-195 1977-78 Netherlands New Railway Line Survey

Date: 1977 (March, September), 1978 (September)

Source: Railway

Location: Netherlands: Zoetermeer

N=: 960: 425 (before railway opened), 299 (4 months

after opened), 221 (16 months after opened), 15

(new residents moving in between 4 and 16 months

after opening)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: de Jong 1983b;van Dongen and van den Berg 1980

Notes: Respondents were interviewed several times.

NET-196 1978 Dutch Homes for the Aged Environmental

Noise Study

Date: 1978 (September)

Source: Road traffic, Airports, Railways, Industry

Location: Netherlands: 57 locations (37 near roads and 20

near airports, industries or railway tracks)

N=: 345 (228 road traffic, 117 other sources)
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-37-

Noise data: Yes

Reference: van Dongen 1980b;van Dongen 1980a;van Dongen

1981b

Notes: Residents of homes for the aged were interviewed.

NET-232 1980 Netherlands Industrial Noise Survey

Date: 1980 (January)

Source: Industry (include railway shunting yards)

Location: Netherlands: 20 industrial and 6 railway shunting

yard areas

N=: 695

Noise data: Yes (for 297 respondents)

Reference: Groeneveld 1981;Groeneveld and Gerretsen

1984;Groeneveld and Verboom 1981;Vos 1985

Notes: None

NET-240 1984 Schiphol Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

Date: 1984 (Autumn)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: Netherlands: Schiphol airport

N=: 581

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Diamond and Walker 1986b;Diamond and Walker

1986a;Miedema 1987

Notes: This survey was jointly designed under

Commission of European Communities auspices

for comparison with an Orly Survey (FRA-239)

and Glasgow Survey (UKD-238).

NET-255 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Netherlands)

Date: 1982 (September, October)

Source: Impulse noise (Shooting range, Shipyard,

Scrapyard, Metal Working), Road traffic

Location: Netherlands: Bussum, Driebergen, Vught,

Bolnes/Ridderkerk, H.I.Ambacht/Zwijndrecht,

Sittard, Lekkerkerk, Raamsdonksveer

N=: 389

Noise data: Yes

Reference: de Jong and Commins 1983;Groeneveld

1984;Groeneveld 1986;Groeneveld and de Jong

1984;Groeneveld and de Jong 1985b;Groeneveld

and de Jong 1985a;Groeneveld, van den Berg, and

de Jong 1985;Miedema 1987

Notes: This is part of a Commission of European

Communities coordinated joint study in France

(FRA-252), Germany (GER-253), and Ireland

(IRE-254). The study results support at least a 10-

decibel penalty for impulse noise.

NET-257 1979 Netherlands Industrial Noise Pilot Survey

Date: 1979 (Summer)

Source: Industrial (includes railway shunting yards)

Location: Netherlands: 50 locations

N=: 308

Noise data: No

Reference: Groeneveld 1980

Notes: Interviews were conducted by telephone. This

study was used as a pilot survey and as a basis for

sample selection for the 1980 Netherlands

Industrial Noise Survey (NET-232).

NET-258 1975 Amsterdam Home Sound Insulation Study

Date: 1975 (March), 1978 (November)

Source: Expressway traffic

Location: Netherlands: the Einsteinweg area (along National

Road 10) in Amsterdam

N=: 622 (before insulation installed), 347 (after

installed)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bitter, Holst, and Kandelaar 1982;de Jong

1981f;de Jong 1981a;van Dongen 1981a;van

Dongen 1982

Notes: This study was planned for comparison to a similar

earlier study (NET-106).

NET-259 1977 Netherlands Industrial Noise Pilot Survey

Date: 1977 (October, November)

Source: Industrial

Location: Netherlands: Eerbeek, Geleen/Stein, Hoogvliet,

Wormerveer

N=: 40

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hentenaar 1978

Notes: A variable format, unstructured interview was

administered. This is a qualitative pilot study for

the 1980 Netherlands Industrial Noise Survey

(NET-232).

NET-260 1980-81 Netherlands Pile Driver Impulse Noise

Survey

Date: 1980-1981

Source: Industrial (Impulse noise from a pile driver)

Location: Netherlands: The Hague Wormerveer

N=: 56

Noise data: Yes

Reference: de Jong, van den Berg, and Stolk 1981e

Notes: This is a pilot study initiated by the European

Economic Community.

NET-261 1977 Netherlands National Noise Survey

Date: 1977 (August 14 to September 14)

Source: Community

Location: Netherlands: Representative national sample

N=: 3,974

Noise data: No

Reference: de Jong 1980b;de Jong 1981b
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-38-

Notes: The study measures the extent of noise annoyance

from a national probability sample. A follow-up

study (NET-356) was also conducted.

NET-263 1982-1983 Netherlands New Dwelling Survey

Date: 1982-1983

Source: Equipment in homes

Location: Netherlands

N=: 193 (dwellings)

Noise data: Yes (some dwellings)

Reference: van Dongen 1984;van Dongen 1985

Notes: None

NET-269 1986 Netherlands Low-Level Military Aircraft

Study

Date: 1986 (June)

Source: Military aircraft

Location: Netherlands: Overijssel Province

N=: 625

Noise data: Yes

Reference: de Jong 1986b;de Jong 1986a;de Jong and Kok

1987

Notes: Respondents were interviewed via telephone. The

study compares the reactions of those living under

low-level military flying routes with those at

various distances from the routes and those living

near a military airfield. Some 43% living under

the routes are "very" annoyed. This is

unsatisfactory according to Netherlands noise

criteria.

NET-276 1983 Netherlands Tram/Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1983 (Summer)

Source: Trams, Road traffic

Location: Netherlands: Rotterdam, The Hague, Amsterdam

N=: 798

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Miedema 1987;Miedema and van den Berg

1985;Miedema and van den Berg 1988

Notes: Noise annoyance is lower near straight track than

near curves or junctions at the same noise level.

NET-334 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study

(Netherlands)

Date: 1992 (June)

Source: Wind turbine

Location: Netherlands

N=: 159

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Wolsink and Sprengers 1993

Notes: Similar studies were conducted at the same time in

Germany (GER-335) and Denmark (DEN-333).

NET-354 1990 Marnewaard Shooting Range Residential

Survey

Date: 1990 (October)

Source: Shooting range

Location: Netherlands: Marnewaard

N=: 95

Noise data: Yes

Reference: van den Berg 1993;van Dongen 1991

Notes: About 40% of the respondents who reported

hearing shooting noise were annoyed by it. 

Holiday makers were interviewed in a separate

survey.

NET-356 1987 Netherlands National Noise Survey

Date: 1987

Source: Community

Location: Netherlands: Nationally representative survey

N=: 4,062

Noise data: Yes (for those respondents reporting regularly

hearing noise from highways/motorways)

Reference: De Jong, Groeneveld, and Halkes 1990;de Jong

1988a;de Jong 1988b;de Jong and Groeneveld

1990

Notes: This study was created for comparison to a 1977

study (NET-261). Traffic noise is less annoying in

areas that are otherwise quiet.

NET-361 1993 Netherlands National Environmental Survey

Date: 1993 (June, July, September, October)

Source: Community

Location: Netherlands

N=: 4,038

Noise data: No

Reference: de Jong, Opmeer, and Miedema 1994;de Jong,

Opmeer, and Miedema 1995

Notes: This is the third in a series of national probability

surveys conducted in the Netherlands (NET-261).

Noise is the most annoying of all surveyed

environmental pollutants. Road traffic is the

greatest source of annoyance.

NET-362 1984-85 Arnhem Trolley Bus Introduction Survey

Date: 1984 (May, June), 1995 (May, June)

Source: Road traffic (special focus on busses)

Location: Netherlands: Arnhem on 35 streets in 3 areas

N=: 1,322 (Interviews were attempted at 550

residences.)

Noise data: Yes (For 220 respondents who were interviewed in

all three study waves.)

Reference: Ericz, Noordam, and Schoonderbeek

1986;Miedema 1992;Schoonderbeek 1986

Notes: Interviews were conducted just before, one month

after, and one year after electric trolley buses

replaced diesel buses on one bus route. Annoyance

was reduced after the introduction of the trolley
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-39-

buses.

NET-371 1996-97 Schiphol Airport GES Survey

Date: 1996 (November) to 1997 (February)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Netherlands: within 25 kilometers of Schiphol

N=: 11,812

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Franssen et al. 1998;Franssen et al.

1999;Franssen, Lebret, and Staatsen

1999;Franssen, Van Kamp, and de Jong

2000;Franssen, van Wiechen, van Poll, Kruize, de

Jong, Miedema, and Lebret 1998

Notes: The mail survey with a 39% response rate was

supplemented by a telephone survey of about 500

respondents that provided a basis for adjustments

to mail survey results. Noise was related to noise

annoyance, sleep disturbance, perceived health, the

use of medication, and perception of quality of life.

NET-378 1998 Rotterdam-Ruhrgebiet Freight Railway Pilot

Study

Date: 1998

Source: Aircraft

Location: Netherlands: near a planned heavy-goods railway

line in the Netherlands that connects Rotterdam

(Netherlands) and Ruhrgebiet (Germany)

N=: 55 (approximate)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Claassen, Katteler, Steenbekkers, and de Jong

1999

Notes: The study tested the questionnaire for a main study

among residents living in the vicinity of the socalled 'Betuwe-spoorlijn', a projected heavy-goodsonly line connecting Rotterdam port with the

Ruhrgebiet in Germany.

NET-379 1998 Groningen Eelde Airport Survey

Date: 1998 (Spring, Autumn)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Netherlands

N=: 407 residents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: van Dongen, Steenbekkers, and Vos 1999

Notes: Other residents using recreation facilities near the

airport were interviewed with a different

questionnaire as part of the same project.

NET-460 1993 Dutch Artillery Range Noise Annoyance and

Startle Survey

Date: 1993 (Autumn)

Source: Artillery (bangs from large and moderately large

artillery: 25 mm guns, 81 and 120 mm mortars,

155 mm howitzers)

Location: Netherlands: 't Harde military artillery range.

N=: 300 (divided evenly between areas near and far

from the artillery range)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Vos 1999a;Vos 1999b

Notes: Since annoyance and startle responses were highly

correlated, it was concluded that only annoyance

responses are needed for rating criteria.

NET-462 1997 Netherlands Home Insulation Survey

Date: 1997 (February, March, May, June)

Source: Neighbors in adjacent dwellings

Location: Netherlands: 23 municipalities (Both urban and

rural areas)

N=: 660

Noise data: Yes: sound insulation data were obtained

Reference: van Dongen, Vos, van Luxemburg, and Raijmakers

1998

Notes: About 10 percent of those surveyed are very

annoyed by the noise from adjacent dwellings. The

annoying noises are of both mechanical and human

origin.

NET-468 1998 Schiphol Sleep Disturbance Pilot Survey

Date: 1998

Source: Aircraft

Location: Netherlands: 2 areas near Schiphol airport

(Rijsenhout, Spaarndam)

N=: 22 respondents, including one couple, participated

for 27 consecutive nights

Noise data: Yes: exterior measurements and, for some nights,

interior measurements

Reference: Passchier-Vermeer, van Gils, Vos, Miedema, de

Roo, Verhoeff, and Middelkoop 1999

Notes: A self-administered questionnaire was completed

in the evening and morning of each of the 27 study

nights. In addition, a face-to-face interview was

conducted before the study and a self-administered

questionnaire was completed after the study. 

Based on this pilot study, it was concluded that a

study of 300 subjects for 12 nights would be

sufficient to estimate dose/response relationships.

NIG-485 Nigeria Eight-City Noise Survey

Date: 1996 Publication (July to November survey but

year not reported)

Source: Noise in the neighborhood

Location: Nigeria: 8 large cities (Benin, Omitsha, Port

Harcourt, Ilorin, Lagos, Ibadan, Kano, Kaduna)

N=: 577

Noise data: No (Measurements were not linked to respondents'

addresses.)

Reference: Saadu, Onyeonwu, Ayorinde, and Ogisi

1996;Saadu, Onyeonwu, Ayorinde, and Ogisi 1998
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-40-

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were distributed

to workers, traders and adult pedestrians who then

completed questions about their home

environments. Road traffic and conversations of

others are the most important sources of

annoyance.

NIG-486 South-Eastern Nigeria Eight-City Road Traffic

Survey

Date: 2000 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Nigeria: 60 sites in 8 cities (Aba, Calabar, Enugu,

Ikot Ekpene, Onitsha, Owerri, Port-Harcourt, Uyo)

N=: 2,892

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Onuu 2000

Notes: Road traffic noise is a major environmental

problem in South-Eastern Nigeria. The method of

administering the questionnaire is not described.

NOR-311 1989 Oslo Airport Survey

Date: 1989 (April, September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Norway: Oslo (15 areas)

N=: 3,337

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Aas, Kolbenstvedt, Bakketeig, Larssen, ClenchAas, Solberg, and Klæboe 1991;Gjestland, Liasjø,

and Bøhn 1990;Gjestland, Liasjø, Granøien, Bøhn,

and Gaustad 1990;Gjestland, Liasjø, Granøien, and

Fields 1990

Notes: Residents were surveyed before and after a change

in air traffic. The effect of flight-path location on

annoyance is studied.

NOR-328 1992-93 Bodö Aircraft Military Exercise Survey

Date: 1992 (5 periods), 1993 (February)

Source: Military aircraft

Location: Norway: Bodö

N=: 4,303

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bugge 1994;Gjestland, Granøien, and Liasjø

1995;Gjestland, Granøien, Liasjø, and Bugge

1993;Gjestland, Liasjø, and Granøien

1994;Gjestland, Liasjø, and Granøien 1995

Notes: Respondents were approached before (February),

during the first short-term military exercise

(March), after the first exercise (April, August), or

at two times after a September exercise (October

1992, February 1993). An identical questionnaire

was used in a similar study at Værnes airport

(NOR-366).

NOR-366 1990-91 Værnes Aircraft Military Exercise Survey

Date: 1990 (3 periods), 1991 (August)

Source: Military aircraft

Location: Norway: Værnes airport (Trondheim)

N=: 1,424 responses from approximately 1,233

respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bugge 1994;Bugge, Gjestland, Liasjø, and

Granøien 1991;Gjestland, Liasjø, and Granøien

1994

Notes: Respondents were interviewed by telephone before

(August 1990), during (September 1990),

immediately after (October 1990), and one year

later (August 1991). Some respondents were

interviewed more than once. An identical

questionnaire was used in a similar study at Bodö

airport (NOR-328).

NOR-397 1999 Oslo Contingent Valuation Noise Survey

Date: 1999 (June, July)

Source: Road traffic (406 selected based on only road

traffic noise, railway, aircraft, or rifle range: 204

selected based on one or more of road, rail,

aircraft, rifle range)

Location: Norway: Oslo and Ullensaker (new Oslo airport)

N=: 610 (Oslo, 406; Ullensaker, 204)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Navrud 2000

Notes: The study used the contingent valuation method

(CV) to estimate that the reported willingness-topay (WTP) for noise reduction was about 120 Euro

per household per year.

NOR-398 1987 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1987 (September)

Source: Road traffic (before change in exposure)

Location: Norway: Oslo (8 areas in Vålerenga/Gamlebyen

area)

N=: 1,028

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Aas, Kolbenstvedt, Bakketeig, Larssen, ClenchAas, Solberg, and Klæboe 1991;Bartonova,

Clench-Aas, Walker, Tønnesen, and Larssen

1999;Clench-Aas, Bartonova, Klæboe, and

Kolbenstvedt 1999;Clench-Aas, Bartonova,

Klæboe, and Kolbenstvedt 2000;Klæboe

1998;Klæboe 2000;Klæboe, Kolbenstvedt, ClenchAas, and Bartonova 1999;Klæboe, Kolbenstvedt,

Clench-Aas, and Bartonova 2000;Klæboe,

Kolbenstvedt, Lercher, and Solberg

1998;Kolbenstvedt 1998b;Kolbenstvedt, Klæboe,

Clench-Aas, and Bartonova 1999

Notes: Reactions were measured in the area before a

change in exposure that was examined in two later

surveys (NOR-400, NOR-401).
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-41-

NOR-399 1990 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1990 (early Summer)

Source: Road traffic (change due to construction of a tunnel

that reduced traffic in the area)

Location: Norway: Oslo (Vålerenga/Gamlebyen area)

N=: 500 (approximate)

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Aas, Kolbenstvedt, Bakketeig, Larssen, ClenchAas, Solberg, and Klæboe 1991

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted to study

changes due to the construction of a tunnel that

reduced traffic in the area.

NOR-400 1994 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1994 (Autumn)

Source: Road traffic (change due to construction of a tunnel

that reduced traffic in the area)

Location: Norway: Oslo (14 areas in Vålerenga/Gamlebyen

area)

N=: 1,078

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bartonova, Clench-Aas, Walker, Tønnesen, and

Larssen 1999;Clench-Aas, Bartonova, Klæboe, and

Kolbenstvedt 1999;Clench-Aas, Bartonova,

Klæboe, and Kolbenstvedt 2000;Klæboe

1998;Klæboe 2000;Klæboe, Kolbenstvedt, ClenchAas, and Bartonova 1999;Klæboe, Kolbenstvedt,

Clench-Aas, and Bartonova 2000;Klæboe,

Kolbenstvedt, Lercher, and Solberg

1998;Kolbenstvedt 1998b;Kolbenstvedt, Klæboe,

Clench-Aas, and Bartonova 1999

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted to study

changes due to construction of a tunnel that

reduced traffic in the area.

NOR-401 1996 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1996 (November)

Source: Road traffic (change due to construction of new

main road in neighborhood)

Location: Norway: Oslo (14 areas in Vålerenga/Gamlebyen

area)

N=: 1,079

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bartonova, Clench-Aas, Walker, Tønnesen, and

Larssen 1999;Clench-Aas, Bartonova, Klæboe, and

Kolbenstvedt 1999;Clench-Aas, Bartonova,

Klæboe, and Kolbenstvedt 2000;Klæboe

1998;Klæboe 2000;Klæboe and Fyhri

1997;Klæboe, Kolbenstvedt, Clench-Aas, and

Bartonova 1999;Klæboe, Kolbenstvedt, ClenchAas, and Bartonova 2000;Klæboe, Kolbenstvedt,

Lercher, and Solberg 1998;Kolbenstvedt

1998b;Kolbenstvedt, Klæboe, Clench-Aas, and

Bartonova 1999

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted to study the

reactions after changes due to construction of a

new main road in the neighborhood.

NOR-403 1989 Horton Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1989 (August)

Source: Road traffic (before change in exposure)

Location: Norway: Oslo (Horten area)

N=: 500 (approximate)

Noise data: No

Reference: Aas, Kolbenstvedt, Bakketeig, Larssen, ClenchAas, Solberg, and Klæboe 1991

Notes: The study examined reactions to noise before a

change in noise exposure.

NOR-404 1986 Drammen Road Traffic Noise survey

Date: 1986 (January)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Norway: Oslo (Drammen area)

N=: 1,000 (approximate)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Aas, Kolbenstvedt, Bakketeig, Larssen, ClenchAas, Solberg, and Klæboe 1991

Notes: This was a preparatory study for three later

Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Noise studies

(NOR-398, NOR-400, NOR-401). Information

was also collected about air pollution.

NOR-405 1997 Norwegian Survey of Living Conditions

Date: 1997 (September 22) to 1998 (January 9)

Source: Road traffic, Aircraft, Railway, Industry

Location: Norway: National probability sample

N=: 3,663

Noise data: No

Reference: Kolbenstvedt 1998a;Kolbenstvedt and Klæboe

1999;Sundvoll A. and Teigum M. 1998

Notes: The survey obtained views from a nationally

representative sample. Road traffic noise is the

environmental problem that affects the greatest

number of Norwegians.

NOR-520 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study (Norway)

Date: 1971

Source: Aircraft

Location: Norway: Oslo airport (6 areas)

N=: 598 (6 areas)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Åhrlin 1988;Åhrlin and Rylander 1979;Berglund,

Berglund, Jonsson, and Lindvall 1977;Berglund,

Berglund, and Lindvall 1975;Berglund, Berglund,

and Lindvall 1987;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz

1991;Rylander, Björkman, Åhrlin, Sörensen, and

Berglund 1980;Rylander, Björkman, and Sörensen

1993;Rylander and Sörensen 1973;Rylander,
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-42-

Sörensen, Alexandre, and Gilbert

1973;Rylander, Sörensen, and Berglund

1974;Rylander, Sörensen, and Kajland

1972;Schultz 1978;Sörensen, Berglund, and

Rylander 1973

Notes: The 3,746 interviews from this and two other

studies (DEN-519, NOR-520, SWE-035) have been

analyzed as a single data set. (They were

represented as a single study, SWE-035, in the

1981 and 1991 editions of this catalog.) The faceto-face interview was modified somewhat between

the first and last interviews (from 1969 to 1976) in

the three countries. The reports state that

annoyance is less closely related to energy-based

noise indices such as LAeq and FBN than to

indices based on peak noise levels and numbers of

aircraft.

OMA-476 1996-98 Oman Sound Environment Survey

Date: 1996 (April for Muscat), 1998 (October for Ibra

and Jibbal)

Source: Overall sound environment

Location: Oman: 7 areas (5 in Muscat City, 2 in the villages

of Ibra and Jibbal)

N=: 647

Noise data: Measurements were made to characterize large

areas

Reference: Al-harthy 2000;Al-harthy and Tamura 1997b;Alharthy and Tamura 1997a;Al-harthy and Tamura

1997c;Al-harthy and Tamura 1999a;Al-harthy and

Tamura 1999b

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were personally

delivered to each study household. The primary

noise problem in Muscat is road traffic.

POL-184 Polish Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1979 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Railway

Location: Poland

N=: 837

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Koszarny, Szata, and Gorynski 1979;Koszarny,

Szata, and Gorynski 1980

Notes: None

POL-198 1974 Warsaw Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1974-75 (Winter)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Poland: Warszawa-Okecie Airport

N=: 511

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Koszarny and Maziarka 1975;Koszarny, Maziarka,

and Szata 1976

Notes: Some indications of links between health and noise

are reported.

POL-477 1997 Warsaw Low-Frequency Interior Noise Study

Date: 1997 (April to September)

Source: Low frequency noise (mechanical sources either

inside or outside building)

Location: Poland: Warsaw (9 blocks of flats)

N=: 47 (at least 27 had complained about low frequency

noise to the authorities)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Mirowska 2000;Mirowska and Mróz

1999;Mirowska and Mróz 2000;Mirowska, Mróz,

and Nidzinska-Mróz 1998;Mróz, Nidzinska-Mróz,

Nejno-Borkowska, and Mularczyk-Bal 1998

Notes: All adults in each flat were personally interviewed. 

Low frequency noise that is near the hearing

threshold can be annoying.

POR-478 1999 Lisbon Contingent Valuation Road Traffic

Noise Survey

Date: 1999 (June, July, September, October, November)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Portugal: Lisbon metropolitan area

N=: 412

Noise data: Yes: inside and outside

Reference: Arsenio, Bristow, and Wardman 2000;Arsenio,

Patricio, Bristow, Pinelo, Silva, and Wardman

2000

Notes: Computer-assisted, face-to-face interviews were

conducted. A single answer was agreed upon by

all participants from a household. A contingent

valuation method was applied in which

participants attached an economic value to their

apartment relative to that of other apartments at

other noise levels and positions within the same

apartment building.

PUR-188 San Juan Community Noise Survey

Date: 1970's (Year of survey not determined)

Source: Community

Location: Puerto Rico: San Juan

N=: 642

Noise data: No

Reference: Snyder 1977

Notes: Both English and Spanish versions of the

questionnaire were administered.

SAF-028 1968 South Africa Preliminary Aircraft Noise

Survey

Date: 1968 (April)

Source: Aircraft

Location: South Africa: Jan Smuts airport

N=: 120

Noise data: Yes
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-43-

Reference: Mauer 1968;van Niekerk and Muller 1969

Notes: None

SLO-406 1989 Bratislava Medical Student Survey

Date: 1989 (March to June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Slovakia: Bratislava (one noisy dormitory and one

quiet residential area)

N=: 511 (166 in noisy dormitory area, 346 in quiet

area)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Ághová, Voleková, and Jurkovicová 1990;Ághová,

Voleková, Jurkovicová, and Sitár

1992;Jurkovicová, Sobotová, Aghova, and

Voleková 2000;Sobotová, Ághová, Jurkovicová,

and Voleková 2000b;Sobotová, Ághová,

Jurkovicová, and Voleková 2000a;Sobotová,

Ághová, Voleková, and Jurkovicová

1997;Sobotová, Jurkovicová, Voleková, and

Ághová 2000

Notes: A face-to-face interview was conducted with these

medical students during their training. The survey

was the first of two surveys that were separated by

ten years (SLO-407).

SLO-407 1999 Bratislava Medical Student Survey

Date: 1999 (March to June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Slovakia: Bratislava (one noisy dormitory and one

quiet residential area)

N=: 857 (374 in noisy dormitory area, 483 in quiet

area)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sobotová, Ághová, Jurkovicová, and Voleková

2000c;Sobotová, Ághová, Jurkovicová, and

Voleková 2000a;Sobotová, Ághová, Jurkovicová,

and Voleková 2000b

Notes: A face-to-face interview was conducted with these

medical students during their training. The survey

was conducted ten years after a previous study

(SLO-406) and found that noise annoyance had

increased.

SPA-272 1981 Valencia City-Wide Survey

Date: 1981 (January to July)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Spain: Valencia

N=: 400

Noise data: No

Reference: García 1983;García and Fajari 1982;García and

Fajari 1983;García, Romero, and Alamar 1988

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were distributed

through personal channels available to the

investigators.

SPA-273 1982 Valencia Five-Site Survey

Date: 1982 (March to June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Spain: Valencia (five sites)

N=: 490

Noise data: Yes

Reference: García 1983;García and Fajari 1982;García,

Romero, and Alamar 1988

Notes: Respondents completed a self-administered

questionnaire. The survey was designed to

estimate the relationship between noise level and

annoyance.

SPA-274 1982 Valencia Single-Site Survey

Date: 1982 (October to December)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Spain: Valencia (one site)

N=: 200

Noise data: Yes

Reference: García 1983;García and Fajari 1982;García,

Romero, and Alamar 1988

Notes: Respondents completed a self-administered

questionnaire. The survey was planned to study

socio-economic and demographic differences in

annoyance.

SPA-302 1986 Valencia Five-Site Survey

Date: 1986 (December) to 1987 (March)

Source: Community

Location: Spain: Valencia (five sites)

N=: 263

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Arana and García 1997;García, Miralles, García,

and Sempere 1988;García, Miralles, García, and

Sempere 1990;García, Romero, and Alamar

1988;García, Romero, García, and Arana 1989

Notes: Satisfaction with the neighborhood is greater in the

quieter than the noisier areas.

SPA-313 1984-85 Ganda Three-Site Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1984 (Summer), 1984-85 (Winter), 1985

(Summer)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Spain: Ganda

N=: 543

Noise data: Yes

Reference: García, Romero, and Alamar 1988;García,

Romero, García, and Arana 1989;García and

Romero 1987b;García and Romero 1987a;RomeroFaus 1987

Notes: Residents completed a self-administered

questionnaire. The season of the survey does not

affect response, even though there is more traffic

and residents are more likely to have windows
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-44-

open in the summer.

SPA-314 1987-91 Gandía Beach Resort Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1987, 1988, and 1991 (Summers)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Spain: Gandía (a beach resort)

N=: 400

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Romero and García 1992;Romero, García, and

García 1989

Notes: Vacationers completed a self-administered

questionnaire. Road traffic noise is the most

important source of annoyance in this beach resort.

SPA-315 1988 Pamplona Five-Site Noise Survey

Date: 1988 (Spring)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Spain: Pamplona (five sites)

N=: 496

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Arana and García 1989;Arana and García

1997;García, Romero, García, and Arana 1989

Notes: Road traffic was the most annoying noise source in

some areas. Bars, pubs and discotheques were

most annoying in other areas.

SPA-316 1983 Valencia Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1983 (October, November)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Spain: Valencia (26 streets)

N=: 600 (725 were distributed)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Daz, Quiros, Ibñez, Belenguer, Pérez, and Sanchis

1987;Manglano, Gaja, Estellés, and Belmar 1984

Notes: Residents were contacted who lived above the

fourth floor of their buildings.

SPA-317 1984 Gandía City-Wide Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1984 (April) - 1985 (February)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Spain: Gandía (a beach resort)

N=: 600

Noise data: No

Reference: García, Romero, and Alamar 1988;García and

Romero 1986;García and Romero 1987a;Romero

and García 1992

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were distributed

to permanent residents through personal channels

available to the investigators. This is a first of

several studies in this coastal resort.

SPA-320 Zaragoza City Noise Survey

Date: 1993 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Community

Location: Spain: Zaragoza

N=: 700

Noise data: No

Reference: Aguerri Sanchez and Celma Celma 1993

Notes: Residents ranked noise fifth in a list of 18 general

social problems.

SPA-330 Madrid Two-Site Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1993 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Spain: Madrid (2 areas of subsidized housing)

N=: 800

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lopez Barrio and Carles 1993

Notes: Self-reported noise sensitivity was strongly related

to road traffic noise annoyance.

SPA-348 1989-90 Spanish Airport Survey

Date: 1989 (December) to 1990 (March)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Spain: Madrid, Palma, Barcelona, Sevilla,

Valencia, Zaragoza

N=: 1800

Noise data: Yes

Reference: García, Faus, and García 1993

Notes: Some important differences were found between

reactions at around different airports.

SPA-408 1994-95 Spanish Underground Railway Noise

Survey

Date: 1994 - 1995

Source: Structurally radiated sound from underground

railway traffic

Location: Spain: Basque

N=: 24

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Vadillo, Herreros, and Walker 1996

Notes: Residents exposed to the lowest noise levels (below

32 dB(A)) were not bothered by noise from the

railway even though they could sometimes feel

vibrations from a train passage.

SPA-409 Pozuelo de Alarcón Two-Area Acoustical

Environment Survey

Date: 1996 Publication (Survey date not reported) ( noise

measurements in December 1994, January 1995)

Source: No information

Location: Spain: Pozuelo de Alarcón, a small city on the

outskirts of Madrid ( 2 areas)

N=: 354 (214 respondents in the "center" area and 140

in the "station" area)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Recuero, Blanco-Martin, and Grundman 1996

Notes: Noise sources that annoyed residents included road
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-45-

traffic, railway, aircraft, and neighbors.

SPA-410 1999 Pamplona Contingent Valuation Noise

Survey

Date: 1998 (December) - 1999 (December)

Source: Community

Location: Spain: Pamplona

N=: 600

Noise data: No

Reference: Barreiro, Sanchez, and Viladrich-Grau 2000

Notes: Interviews were conducted via telephone. The

contingent valuation method provides estimates of

residents' willingness to pay for noise reduction.

SPA-411 1998 Altet-Alicante Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1998 (May, June)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Spain: Altet-Alicante Airport (3 areas)

N=: 107

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Mallebrera, Romero, Giminez, Marin, and Sanchis

2000

Notes: A related study was conducted of 28 workers in

nearby areas.

SWE-011 1963 Linköping Airport Noise Study

Date: 1963 (Spring), 1964 (September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Sweden: Linköping Airfield

N=: 448 interviews from more than 272 respondents

Noise data: No

Reference: Berlin, Jonsson, and Kajland 1964;Cederlöf,

Jonsson, and Sörensen 1967;Jonsson and Sörensen

1970;Jonsson, Sörensen, Arvidsson, and Berglund

1975

Notes: Some of the original 272 respondents were among

the 176 respondents interviewed in 1964 as part of

an experiment on changing residents' attitudes

toward noise. An experimental group receiving

positive information about the aircraft was less

annoyed than other residents. The area was later

resurveyed as the Linköping I site in the

Scandinavian Nine-Airport survey (SWE-035).

SWE-015 1964-70 Karlstad Artillery Range Noise Study

Date: 1964-1970

Source: Artillery firing

Location: Sweden: Karlstad

N=: 427

Noise data: No

Reference: Jonsson, Sörensen, Arvidsson, and Berglund 1975

Notes: The original 1964 study (334 interviews) was

repeated in 1970 (93 interviews).

SWE-021 1966-67 Stockholm/Gothenburg Traffic Study

Date: 1966 (October, December), 1967 (August,

September)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Stockholm, Gothenburg

N=: 443 (1966), 221 (1967)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fog and Jonsson 1968;Kajland 1970;Schultz 1978

Notes: The 1967 results are included as a non-clustering

survey in the review by Schultz (1978: 395).

SWE-025 1967 Stockholm Comparative Traffic Noise Study

Date: 1967

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Stockholm

N=: 200

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Jonsson, Kajland, Paccagnella, and Sörensen 1969

Notes: This study was designed for comparison to the

1967 Ferrara Comparative Traffic Noise Study

(ITL-318). Despite a higher traffic noise level

(measured indoors) in the Ferrara sample, those in

the Stockholm sample were more annoyed. 

Residents living one story above street level were

interviewed.

SWE-026 1967 Huddinge New Motorway Study

Date: 1967, 1968

Source: Motorway traffic

Location: Sweden: The Stockholm suburb of Huddinge

N=: 144 interviews from 84 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Jonsson and Sörensen 1973;Jonsson, Sörensen,

Arvidsson, and Berglund 1975

Notes: Annoyance did not decrease between the initial

interview with 84 residents (six months after a new

motorway opened) and the reinterview with 60 of

the same residents one year later. Respondents

who moved from the area during the year were no

more annoyed than those remaining.

SWE-035 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study (Sweden)

Date: 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, 1974, 1976

Source: Aircraft

Location: Sweden, Norway, and Denmark: 38 Areas around

9 Airports

N=: 3,746

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Åhrlin 1988;Åhrlin and Rylander 1979;Berglund,

Berglund, Jonsson, and Lindvall 1977;Berglund,

Berglund, and Lindvall 1975;Berglund, Berglund,

and Lindvall 1987;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz

1991;Rylander, Björkman, Åhrlin, Sörensen, and

Berglund 1980;Rylander, Björkman, and Sörensen
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-46-

1993;Rylander and Sörensen 1973;Rylander,

Sörensen, Alexandre, and Gilbert

1973;Rylander, Sörensen, and Berglund

1974;Rylander, Sörensen, and Kajland

1972;Schultz 1978;Sörensen, Berglund, and

Rylander 1973

Notes: The 3,746 interviews from this and two other

studies (DEN-519, NOR-520, SWE-035) have been

analyzed as a single data set. (They were

represented as a single study, SWE-035, in the

1981 and 1991 editions of this catalog.) The faceto-face interview was modified somewhat between

the first and last interviews (from 1969 to 1976) in

the three countries. The reports state that

annoyance is less closely related to energy-based

noise indices such as LAeq and FBN than to

indices based on peak noise levels and numbers of

aircraft.

SWE-054 1971 Trängslet Sonic Boom Study

Date: 1971 (June, July)

Source: Sonic booms from military aircraft

Location: Sweden: Trängslet

N=: 391

Noise data: Yes (for the military sample)

Reference: Rylander, Sörensen, and Berglund 1972

Notes: The 179 questionnaires filled out by soldiers were

self-administered. The 212 civilian questionnaires

are from a mail survey. All booms occurred at

night. Some of the military subjects indicated

nighttime disturbance by pushing buttons. There

was also a "bed-indicator" that showed movements

during sleep.

SWE-100 1970s Kungälv Noise Barrier Study

Date: 1972, 1975

Source: Road traffic, Expressway

Location: Sweden: The Kungälv area of Gothenburg

N=: 161 (83 in Phase I and 78 in Phase II)

Noise data: No

Reference: Holmquist, Claesson, and Tuvegran 1975

Notes: Interviews were carried out in 1972 before, and in

1975 after a barrier was erected.

SWE-108 1972 Burgsvik Sonic Boom Study

Date: 1972 (May, June)

Source: Sonic booms

Location: Sweden: Burgsvik on the island of Gotland

N=: Approximately 346 interviews from approximately

200 people

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Rylander, Sörensen, Andrae, Chatelier, Espmark,

Larsson, and Thackray 1974

Notes: After the main study period, 146 respondents were

reinterviewed. This was part of a coordinated

laboratory/field study.

SWE-142 1976 Stockholm Visby Gothenburg Traffic Noise

Study

Date: 1976 (April, May)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Stockholm, Visby, Gothenburg

N=: 1,377

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Åhrlin 1988;Åhrlin and Rylander 1979;Rylander

1977;Rylander, Åhrlin, and Björkman

1977;Rylander, Sörensen, and Kajland 1976

Notes: Peak noise levels from heavy vehicles are

especially closely related to annoyance. 

Gothenburg results are not included in the 1976

publication.

SWE-165 1976 Gothenburg Tramway Noise Survey

Date: 1976 (April, May)

Source: Tramway, Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Gothenburg (6 areas)

N=: 464

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Åhrlin and Rylander 1979;Fidell, Barber, and

Schultz 1991;Rylander, Björkman, Åhrlin, and

Sörensen 1977

Notes: None

SWE-185 1975 Gothenburg Rifle Range Survey

Date: 1975 (April, May)

Source: Civilian rifle range

Location: Sweden: Gothenburg (9 sites in 4 areas)

N=: 323

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sörensen and Magnusson 1979

Notes: The relationship between peak noise levels and

annoyance is studied.

SWE-222 Nausta Research Camp Sonic Boom Study

Date: 1970 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Sonic booms from military aircraft

Location: Sweden: Research camp in Nausta within a

Swedish military testing area

N=: 198

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Rylander, Sörensen, Berglund, and Brodin 1972

Notes: The sample consists of 33 women from a testing

program and 165 military recruits in road

construction camps.

SWE-223 1981 Swedish Sleep Disturbance and Sound

Insulation Study

Date: 1981
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-47-

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden

N=: 3 (annoyance was measured on 8 nights)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Öhrström and Björkman 1983

Notes: Respondents were first interviewed in June before

insulation was installed and then reinterviewed ten

months later on seven consecutive nights. Bed

movements were measured on four nights.

SWE-228 1978-80 Swedish Railway Study

Date: 1978 (April), 1980 (May)

Source: Railway

Location: Sweden: 15 areas in Stockholm and Malmö

N=: 877

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Åhrlin 1988;Åhrlin and Rylander 1979;Fidell,

Barber, and Schultz 1991;Möhler 1988;Rylander,

Björkman, and Sörensen 1993;Sörensen and

Hammar 1983b;Sörensen and Hammar 1983a

Notes: Face-to-face interviews were conducted with

residents.

SWE-303 1986 Gothenburg Sleep Disturbance Pilot Survey

Date: 1986 (February, March)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Gothenburg

N=: 106 (69 at high noise site, 37 at control site)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Björkman, Levein, Rylander, and Öhrström

1988;Öhrström 1988;Öhrström 1989;Öhrström,

Björkman, and Rylander 1990;Öhrström,

Rylander, and Björkman 1988

Notes: After the initial interview, more detailed

information was collected from the 63 respondents

who also completed a "sleep and mood"

questionnaire for three days. Reports of sleep

quality and mood were lower in the noisy area than

in the control area.

SWE-337 Swedish Low Frequency Heat Pump Noise Study

Date: 1993 Publication (Survey date not determined.)

Source: Low frequency heat pump noise

Location: Sweden

N=: 93

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Persson and Rylander 1993

Notes: This pilot survey presents some information about

the relationship between long-term exposure to low

frequency noise and annoyance.

SWE-344 1988 Gothenburg Psycho-Social Wellbeing Traffic

Survey (Pilot)

Date: 1988 (May, June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: 2 areas in central Gothenburg

N=: 248

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Öhrström 1991;Öhrström 1993;Öhrström and

Rylander 1989;Öhrström and Rylander 1990

Notes: Residents in two areas completed mail

questionnaires about annoyance, sleep, and

depression.

SWE-345 1990 Gothenburg Psycho-Social Wellbeing Traffic

Survey (Main)

Date: 1990

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Gothenburg

N=: 529

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Öhrström 1993

Notes: Mail questionnaires were used. Psycho-social

well-being and self-reported sleep disturbance were

related to annoyance but not to noise level.

SWE-359 Gothenburg 12-Area Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1990 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: 12 areas in Gothenburg

N=: 785

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Björkman 1991;Björkman and Rylander

1990;Rylander, Björkman, and Sörensen 1993

Notes: Respondents completed a mail questionnaire.

SWE-360 Swedish Four-Site Shooting Range Noise

Annoyance Survey

Date: 1988 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Light and heavy caliber weapons

Location: Sweden: within 2 km of any of four shooting

ranges

N=: 299 residents provided 455 responses

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Levein and Åhrlin 1988

Notes: Respondents completed a mail questionnaire. Of

the initial 299 respondents receiving a general

environmental questionnaire, 156 also responded

to the second stage questionnaire that was sent to

only those who indicated that they were annoyed

by noise from shooting ranges on the first

questionnaire.

SWE-365 1989-93 Swedish Railway Survey

Date: 1989 to 1993

Source: Railway

Location: Sweden: (15 areas)

N=: 3,216 (2,883 from first round: 333 from follow-up)
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-48-

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Öhrström 1996a;Öhrström 1997b;Öhrström and

Skånberg 1993;Öhrström and Skånberg

1995;Öhrström and Skånberg 1996

Notes: A main postal questionnaire (2,883 respondents)

with a disguised focus was followed by a second

detailed postal questionnaire to those who were

"rather" or "very" annoyed (338 respondents). 

Train noise is more annoying when there is also

vibration.

SWE-368 1996 Gothenburg Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1996 (January-June )

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Gothenburg (15 areas)

N=: 1,316

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Björkman, Sato, Yano, and Rylander 1998;Murase,

Sato, Yano, Björkman, Rylander, and Dankittikul

2000;Sato, Murase, Yano, Björkman, Rylander,

and Dankittikul 2000;Sato, Yano, Björkman, and

Rylander 1999;Sato, Yano, Björkman, and

Rylander 2000;Sato, Yano, Yamashita, Kawai,

Rylander, Björkman, and Öhrström 1998a;Sato,

Yano, Yamashita, Kawai, Rylander, Björkman,

and Öhrström 1998b;Yano, Sato, Björkman, and

Rylander 2000

Notes: Respondents completed a mail questionnaire about

noise and environmental conditions. Noise level

was represented by both LAeq and the highest

noise event in one hour of observation.

Respondents in apartments were less annoyed at

the same noise exposure than those in detached or

row houses. Comparable surveys were conducted

in Japan (JPN-369, JPN-382).

SWE-412 1997 Sollentuna Road/Rail Noise Survey

Date: 1997 (April: questionnaire distribution date)

Source: Road traffic, Railway

Location: Sweden: Sollentuna municipality ten miles north of

Stockholm

N=: 759

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bluhm and Nordling 2000;Bluhm, Rosenlund, and

Berglind 1998

Notes: Respondents completed a postal questionnaire. 

Hypertension was related to road traffic noise

exposure among women but not among men.

SWE-413 1996 Kungsbacka Railway Noise Countermeasures

Study

Date: 1996

Source: Railway

Location: Sweden: Kungsbacka

N=: 512

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Öhrström 1997a

Notes: Respondents completed a postal questionnaire. 

Countermeasures against vibration were found to

reduce annoyance with vibration. Some 36 persons

in this study also participated in a 1990 study

(SWE-365). Some 330 respondents had been

living in the house before the countermeasures

introduced a change in exposure.

SWE-414 1995-96 Lund Railway Noise Barrier Survey

Date: 1995, 1996 (all were about two years after new

noise barrier)

Source: Railway

Location: Sweden: Lund

N=: 127

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Öhrström 1996b

Notes: A postal questionnaire was completed. The study

was conducted about two years after noise barriers

had been installed near the railway. A study had

previously been conducted in the same area (SWE365).

SWE-415 1997 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey (Before)

Date: 1997 (October - December-- before the tunnel

opening in January 1998)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Gothenburg (2 areas on Västre

Bräckevägen island)

N=: 142: a 3-day sleep questionnaire was completed by

116 people, 26 participated in a sleep-actimeter

study

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Öhrström, Agge, and Björkman 1998;Öhrström

and Skånberg 2000

Notes: The self-administered questionnaire was personally

delivered to one or two residents in each

household. This is the first of three 1997-1998

studies in the area (SWE-416 SWE-417).

SWE-416 1998 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey (After,

Preliminary)

Date: 1998 (May, June -- Minor follow-up study on sleep 

after January 1998 tunnel opening)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Gothenburg (Västre Bräckevägen island)

N=: 24 respondents (from among the 26 who had

completed a 1997 sleep-actimeter study)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Öhrström, Agge, and Björkman 1998;Öhrström

and Skånberg 2000

Notes: This is a small follow-up study on sleep issues that
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-49-

was conducted after the opening of the road

traffic tunnel in January 1998. Two other

studies were conducted in the same area before

and after the opening (SWE-415, SWE-417).

The self-administered questionnaires were

personally delivered to one or two residents in

each house.

SWE-417 1999 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey (After,

Primary)

Date: 1999 (April, May for this main study after January

1998 tunnel opening)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Gothenburg (2 areas on Västre

Bräckevägen island)

N=: 120 respondents who previously participated in a

1997 study

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Öhrström and Skånberg 2000

Notes: The self-administered questionnaire was delivered

to one or two residents in each household. This

was the main study that followed the opening of a

new traffic tunnel and is related to two studies

conducted before the tunnel opened (SWE-415,

SWE-416).

SWE-418 1999 Stockholm Noise Barrier Traffic Survey

Date: 1999 (May, June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Stockholm

N=: 741 respondents from 459 households

Noise data: No

Reference: Berglund and Nilsson 2000

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were personally

delivered to each household and later personally

collected. All adults in the household were asked

to respond.

SWE-419 1988-93 Swedish Small Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1988 (May, Landvetter airport), 1989 (October,

Säve airport), 1993 (May, Everöd airport)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Sweden: Three small airports (Landvetter, Säve,

and Everöd (8 areas))

N=: 513

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Rylander and Björkman 1997

Notes: The data were collected using a postal

questionnaire.

SWE-420 1992 Gothenburg Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1992 (November, December)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Sweden: Gothenburg (2 sites)

N=: 115 (two sites)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Yano, Izumi, Rylander, and Bjorkman 1994

Notes: The data were collected using a postal

questionnaire.

SWE-437 Swedish Eight-Range Heavy Weapons Noise

Survey

Date: 1996 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Artillery

Location: Sweden: 29 areas near 8 shooting ranges

N=: 1,483 (approximate)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Rylander, Åhrlin, and Lundquist 1993;Rylander,

Åhrlin, and Lundquist 1994;Rylander and

Lundquist 1996

Notes: All respondents completed an initial postal

questionnaire. Those indicating annoyance with

heavy weapons noise were sent a second

questionnaire with detailed questions about heavy

weapons noise effects.

SWI-053 1971 Swiss Three-City Noise Survey

Date: 1971 (April), 1972 (June)

Source: Aircraft (all three cities), Road traffic (Basel)

Location: Switzerland: Zurich, Geneva, Basel

N=: 3,939

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Graf, Meier, and

Müller 1974;Graf, Müller, and Meier

1974;Grandjean, Graf, Lauber, Meier, and Mueller

1973;Grandjean, Graf, Lauber, Meier, and Mueller

1976;Nemecek, Wehrli, and Turrian 1981;Schultz

1978;Wehrli and Nemecek 1979

Notes: None

SWI-133 1976 Zurich Street Traffic Noise (Apartments)

Survey

Date: 1976

Source: Road traffic

Location: Switzerland: Zurich

N=: 800

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bakke, Wehrli, Wanner, Nemecek, Turrian, and

Grandjean 1977;Nemecek, Wehrli, and Turrian

1981;Wanner, Wehrli, Bakke, Nemecek, Turrian,

and Grandjean 1977;Wehrli, Huser, Egli, Bakke,

and Grandjean 1976;Wehrli and Nemecek 1979

Notes: Women were interviewed who lived in apartments

built after 1962.

SWI-158 1977 Zurich Pilot Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1977

Source: Road traffic
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-50-

Location: Switzerland: Four areas in Zurich

N=: 1,297

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bakke, Wehrli, Wanner, Nemecek, Turrian, and

Grandjean 1977;Nemecek, Wehrli, and Turrian

1981;Wanner, Wehrli, Bakke, Nemecek, Turrian,

and Grandjean 1977;Wanner, Wehrli, Nemecek,

and Turrian 1977;Wehrli and Nemecek 1979

Notes: A mail questionnaire was used. Air quality was

also assessed.

SWI-159 1977 Swiss N-3 Motorway Study

Date: 1977 (September)

Source: Motorway traffic

Location: Switzerland: N-3 motorway in the vicinity of

Sargans

N=: 150

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Nemecek, Grandjean, Baumgartner, Müller, and

Roth 1979;Nemecek, Grandjean, Baumgartner,

Roth, and Müller 1978

Notes: A self-administered questionnaire was used. 

Special attention was directed at the costs of noise

and at evaluating alternatives for alleviating the

effects of noise.

SWI-173 1978 Zurich Time-of-Day Survey

Date: 1978

Source: Road traffic

Location: Switzerland: Zurich and vicinity (18 study sites)

N=: 1607

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Nemecek, Wehrli, and Turrian 1981;Wehrli and

Grandjean 1979;Wehrli and Nemecek

1979;Wehrli, Nemecek, Turrian, Hofmann, and

Wanner 1978;Wehrli, Nemecek, Turrian, Wanner,

and Hofmann 1978

Notes: Respondents completed a mail questionnaire.

SWI-180 1979 Swiss General Aviation Survey

Date: 1979 (Late Summer)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Switzerland: Six general aviation airports (BernBelp, Birrfeld, Buttwil, Gruyeres, La Chaux-deFonds, Lugano-Agno)

N=: 1,428

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Institut für Praxisorientierte Sozialforschung 1980

Notes: Noise from general aviation was not perceived to

be the dominating noise problem except in the

areas immediately surrounding airports.

SWI-304 1986 Swiss Multi-Story Building Sound Insulation

Study

Date: 1986 (April, May)

Source: Community, Interior noise

Location: Switzerland: 11 groups of buildings

N=: 447

Noise data: Yes: inside and outside

Reference: Rabinowitz, Bakonyi, Bocquet, Meyer, Olivetti,

and Rey 1988

Notes: Mail questionnaires were used. Respondents'

ratings of exterior noise, facade sound reduction

and indoor sound reduction are all related to the

respective measured acoustical criteria.

SWI-312 1984 Visual Context of Noise Survey (Switzerland)

Date: 1984

Source: Road traffic

Location: Switzerland: Zug

N=: 240 (approximately) surveyed but fewer are used

for many analyses

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kastka and Noack 1987;Kastka, Noack, Mau,

Maas, Conrad, Ritterstaedt, and Hangartner 1986

Notes: This is part of a German/Swiss survey (GER-291). 

Mail questionnaires were used in Switzerland. The

streets of the Swiss town were judged to be more

attractive. At the same noise level, there was less

annoyance for residents in the Swiss than the

German town.

SWI-469 1999 Swiss Noise Barrier Survey

Date: 1999 (June, July)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Switzerland: 17 locations in 12 cities

N=: 509

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Meloni and Fischer 2000

Notes: Computer-assisted telephone interviews were

conducted. Traffic noise annoyance is less with a

barrier than at a similar noise level without a

barrier.

THA-327 1992 Songkhla Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1992 (July, August)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Thailand: two sites in Songkhla. One site is a

recently developed suburban area with low housing

density, and one a densely populated urban area.

N=: 232 (138 at urban site, 94 at suburban site)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Dankittikul, Izumi, Yano, Kurosawa, and

Yamashita 1993;Izumi, Dankittikul, Yamashita,

and Yano 1994

Notes: A comparison with a Japanese survey (JPN-326)

found strong cross-cultural similarities. A selfadministered questionnaire was used.
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-51-

THA-421 1997-98 Bangkok Road Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1997 (July, August) - 1998 (August)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Thailand: Bangkok (2 areas in 1997 and 4 areas in

1998)

N=: 373 (approximate: 183 from detached and about

190 from attached row houses)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Murase, Sato, Yano, Björkman, Rylander, and

Dankittikul 2000;Sato, Murase, Yano, Björkman,

Rylander, and Dankittikul 2000

Notes: Questionnaires were distributed at homes and then

collected from each address. Residents in Bangkok

were more annoyed at the same noise level than

were respondents in Japanese surveys (JPN-369,

JPN-382). The study was also designed for

comparison to a Swedish survey (SWE-368).

THA-455 1990-91 Bangkok Personal Noise Exposure Survey

Date: 1990 (November) - 1991 (October)

Source: Community

Location: Thailand: Bangkok (36 districts)

N=: 198

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Phothiphichitr 1994

Notes: Respondents carried exposure meters for 24 hours

during all of their work and home activities and

then answered questions about their reaction to

each noise environment.

TRK-283 1980-84 Istanbul Noise Survey

Date: 1980 (10 sites), 1983-1984 (7 sites)

Source: Road traffic, Aircraft, Railway

Location: Turkey: Istanbul (17 sites)

N=: 3,179 (1,460 traffic, 721 aircraft, 998 railway)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kurra 1983;Kurra 1988

Notes: Considerable annoyance with noise is found in this

city in a developing country.

TRK-367 Istanbul Trans-European Motorway Survey

Date: 1995 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Motorway traffic

Location: Turkey: Istanbul (19 sites in one area)

N=: 154

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kurra, Tamer, and Rice 1995

Notes: A random sample of residents from ages 18 to 65

were interviewed who had lived in the area at least

6 months. Annoyance was found to increase with

increasing noise level.

UKD-001 1943 British Home Noise Survey

Date: 1943 (November)

Source: Community, Interior noise inside dwellings

Location: U.K.: 40 cities in Great Britain

N=: 2,017

Noise data: No

Reference: Chapman 1948

Notes: None

UKD-003 1952 Sound Insulation in Flats Survey

Date: 1952 (December), 1953 (March)

Source: Interior

Location: U.K.: London, Glasgow

N=: 1,491

Noise data: Yes: sound insulation of floors data

Reference: Gray 1956;Gray, Cartwright, and Parkin

1958;Pickles 1956

Notes: All respondents were housewives. Both airborne

and impact noises from adjacent flats are

disturbing.

UKD-008 1961 Heathrow Aircraft Noise Survey (First

Heathrow Survey)

Date: 1961 (September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: London Heathrow Airport

N=: 1,731 Main study, (also a special sample of 178

complainants)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;McKennell

1963;McKennell 1965;McKennell

1969;McKennell 1970;McKennell 1973;Schultz

1978;Wilson 1963

Notes: The NNI (Noise and Number Index) was derived

from the analysis. The study includes a subsample

of complainants.

UKD-009 1961 Central London Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1961 (July, August)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Central London

N=: 1,377

Noise data: Yes

Reference: McKennell and Hunt 1966

Notes: Traffic noise is the most important noise heard by

and bothering residents.

UKD-010 1963 Welsh Village Impulse Noise (Exercise

Yellow Hammer)

Date: 1963 (June to September)

Source: Explosive charges at height of 500 feet (simulating

sonic booms from aircraft)

Location: U.K.: One small Welsh village

N=: Several thousand interviews from approximately

220 respondents

Noise data: Yes
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-52-

Reference: Webb and Warren 1967

Notes: Four panels of respondents were repeatedly

interviewed. The level of annoyance decreased

somewhat over the fourteen-week study period

UKD-024 1967 Heathrow Aircraft Noise Study (Second

Heathrow Survey)

Date: 1967 (September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: London Heathrow Airport

N=: 4,699 main sample

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis

1971;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Knowler

1971;MIL Research 1971;Schultz 1978

Notes: The study was designed for comparison with the

1961 Heathrow study (UKD-008). The study

includes a subsample of noise-insulated homes.

UKD-029 1968 Coventry Pilot Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1968

Source: Railway

Location: U.K.: Coventry

N=: 85

Noise data: No

Reference: Walters 1970

Notes: Two different questionnaires were used.

UKD-030 1967 B.R.S. London Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1967

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: London Area (11 sites)

N=: 1,200

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griffiths 1968;Griffiths and Langdon

1968;Langdon 1980

Notes: The Traffic Noise Index (TNI) was derived from

the survey's results.

UKD-033 1969 Mixed Road/Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1969-1970 (Winter)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: U.K.: London Heathrow Airport

N=: 315 (approximately)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Bottom 1971a;Bottom 1971b;Bottom and Waters

1971;Bottom and Waters 1972;Waters and Bottom

1971

Notes: Residents in high road traffic noise environments

are less annoyed by aircraft noise.

UKD-038 1969 Central England Railway Survey

Date: 1969

Source: Railway

Location: U.K.: Central England

N=: 258

Noise data: No

Reference: Hall 1969;Walters 1970

Notes: None

UKD-050 1970-71 Heston Noise Barrier Study

Date: 1970 (September) to 1971 (September)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: one site along the M14 motorway near

Heston

N=: 458 interviews (142 before barrier, 316 after)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Scholes 1977;Scholes, Mackie, Vulkan, and

Harland 1974

Notes: Residents were first interviewed when a relatively

ineffective wooden fence was in place and later

interviewed after an acoustical barrier was erected. 

Annoyance was reduced by more than would be

expected from previous studies of steady-state noise

conditions.

UKD-052 1971 Gatwick Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1971 (August)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Gatwick Airport

N=: 1,030

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Ollerhead and Cousins 1975

Notes: This study was designed for comparison with the

1961 and 1967 Heathrow surveys (UKD-008,

UKD-024). Reactions were similar in the three

surveys.

UKD-061 1972 Heathrow Airport Noise Pilot Survey

Date: 1972

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: London Heathrow Airport

N=: 600

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Ollerhead 1973;Ollerhead 1977b;Ollerhead

1977c;Ollerhead 1978;Ollerhead 1980;Ollerhead

and Edwards 1974;Ollerhead and Edwards 1977

Notes: Nighttime annoyance was a major topic of this

survey.

UKD-071 1972 B.R.S. London Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (May to July)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: London Area (53 sites)

N=: 2,933

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Berry 1983;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Hood

1977;Langdon 1975;Langdon 1976b;Langdon
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-53-

1976a;Langdon 1977b;Langdon

1977a;Langdon 1978a;Langdon

1978b;Langdon and Buller 1977b;Langdon and

Buller 1977a;Schultz 1978

Notes: This investigation is similar in some respects to the

Building Research Station's earlier 1967 B.R.S.

London Traffic Survey (UKD-030). Reactions

were different for free-flowing and congested

traffic.

UKD-072 1972 English Road Traffic Survey

Date: 1972

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Probability sample of England

N=: 6017

Noise data: Yes (for 1,235 interviews)

Reference: Hapuarachchi 1980;Harland 1977a;Harland

1977b;Harland and Abbott 1977;Hedges

1973;Morton-Williams, Hedges, and Fernando

1978;Sando and Batty 1975

Notes: Noise is the most important disturbance from

traffic after pedestrian danger. Road traffic noise

bothers more people in England than any other

noise source.

UKD-073 1972 Birmingham New Motorway Study

Date: 1972 (April), 1973 (March)

Source: Motorway traffic

Location: U.K.: Bromford Bridge and Firs Estate in

Birmingham

N=: 363 interviews (189 in first wave, 174 in second

wave)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lawson and Walters 1973

Notes: Residents were interviewed both before and after

the motorway was opened in May of 1972.

UKD-074 1972 London Construction Site Survey

Date: 1972

Source: Construction

Location: U.K.: One construction site in London

N=: 535

Noise data: Yes for construction and road traffic

Reference: Large and Ludlow 1975;Large and Ludlow

1976;Ludlow 1973;Ludlow 1976

Notes: This postal survey achieved a 55% response rate

with two reminder letters. The questionnaires

asked about many noise sources. Construction

noise was more annoying than road traffic noise of

the same noise level.

UKD-080 1972 Loughborough Interrupted Traffic Flow

Survey

Date: 1972

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: 12 sites in England

N=: Approximately 250

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Jones and Waters 1974

Notes: Residents completed a postal questionnaire. 

Annoyance was slightly greater at the 6

interrupted-flow traffic sites than at the 6 free-flow

traffic sites.

UKD-086 1973 Kew Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1973

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Kew London

N=: 469 mail interviews, 28 face-to-face interviews

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Edwards 1975;Edwards and Ollerhead

1974;Ollerhead and Edwards 1974

Notes: Respondents completed a mail questionnaire about

reactions to aircraft noise on the previous evening.

UKD-097 1974 English Aircraft Noise Postal Survey

Date: 1974

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Three cities (London-Heathrow, Manchester,

Liverpool)

N=: 725

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Ollerhead 1977a

Notes: The mail questionnaire concerned annoyance with

aircraft noise in the previous month. The response

rate was about 24%. Reactions at the airports

differed.

UKD-111 1975-76 English Mental Health Pilot Survey

Date: 1975 (April, May), 1976

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Two locations near London Heathrow

Airport

N=: 245 interviews from 208 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Barker and Tarnopolsky 1978;Hede 1979;McLean

and Tarnopolsky 1977;Tarnopolsky

1978;Tarnopolsky, Barker, Wiggins, and McLean

1978;Tarnopolsky and Morton-Williams 1980

Notes: Noise annoyance was related to psychiatric

measures, but an association between noise and

psychiatric measures was not widespread. 

Experiments with question order were included. 

Of the 208 respondents in 1975, 137 were

reinterviewed in 1976.

UKD-112 1975 Luton In-migrants Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1975 (August)
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-54-

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Luton Airport

N=: 112

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Wrigley 1976a;Wrigley 1976b

Notes: This is a study of new residents in an airport area. 

Those living further from the airport are more

likely to report that the noise is worst than

expected.

UKD-116 1975 British National Railway Noise Survey

Date: 1975 (October) to 1976 (January)

Source: Railway

Location: U.K.

N=: 1,453

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Berry 1983;de Jong and Miedema 1996;Fidell,

Barber, and Schultz 1991;Fields 1977;Fields

1979;Fields 1983;Fields and Tomberlin

1978;Fields and Walker 1977a;Fields and Walker

1977b;Fields and Walker 1978;Fields and Walker

1980a;Fields and Walker 1980b;Fields and Walker

1980d;Fields and Walker 1980c;Fields and Walker

1980e Fields and Walker 1982b;Fields and Walker

1982a;Fields, Walker, and Large

1976;Garnsworthy 1977;Phillips 1978;Richardson

1976;Walker and Fields 1977;Walker and Fields

1978;Walker and Fields 1980;Windle 1977

Notes: The interview was administered in two slightly

different forms to test question order and question

wording effects. A comparison with previous

surveys showed that railway noise is less annoying

than road traffic and aircraft noise at the same

noise levels.

UKD-118 1975-76 London/Liverpool Panel Survey

Date: 1975 (November), 1976 (January, March)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: London, Liverpool

N=: 738 interviews from 413 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griffiths and Delauzun 1977b;Griffiths and

Delauzun 1977a

Notes: Of the 413 original respondents, 325 were

reinterviewed one year later. Variation in

individual annoyance scores is due more to random

response measurement error than to individual

differences in sensitivity. Twenty-five of the

respondents were also given two self-administered

personality tests that were found to not be related

to annoyance.

UKD-119 1975 Great Britain Interior Noise Survey

Date: 1975

Source: Interior noise from adjacent dwellings

Location: U.K.: Great Britain

N=: 3122

Noise data: No

Reference: Langdon and Buller 1977a

Notes: Respondents lived in dwelling units sharing a

common wall with another dwelling. Residents in

newly constructed dwellings were not less annoyed

than respondents in surveys from earlier periods.

UKD-130 1976 Heathrow Concorde Noise Survey

Date: 1976

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: London Heathrow Airport

N=: 2,631

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Large and Ludlow 1977;McKennell

1977;McKennell 1978;McKennell 1980

Notes: Vibration is relatively annoying for Concorde

noise. It was not possible to assess the effect of

Concorde noise on overall aircraft noise

annoyance. Residents found Concorde flights were

less annoying than they had expected.

UKD-132 1976 Darlington Quiet Town Survey

Date: 1976 (June)

Source: Community

Location: U.K.: Probability sample of Darlington

N=: 494

Noise data: No

Reference: Jupp and Sutton 1976;Landon 1976

Notes: This is the before-treatment survey for the

Darlington Quiet Town Experiment. (Survey

UKD-199 is the after-treatment survey.) About

20% were annoyed by road traffic noise at home

(the most annoying source) but about 30% of those

who work were annoyed by noise at work.

UKD-147 1977 Heathrow Nighttime Pilot Survey

Date: 1977 (December), 1978 (January to April)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: London Heathrow Airport (7 sites)

N=: 1,055 (279 face-to-face interviews, 776 postal

questionnaires)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis

1978c;Directorate of Operational Research and

Analysis 1978b;Directorate of Operational

Research and Analysis 1978a;Directorate of

Operational Research and Analysis 1979;PrescottClarke and Stowell 1983

Notes: Though there were some differences, broadly

similar answers were found on postal and

interviewer-administered surveys.
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-55-

UKD-148 1977 West London (Heathrow) Psychiatric

Morbidity Survey

Date: 1977 (April through Autumn)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: West London area near Heathrow airport

N=: 5,885

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Tarnopolsky, Hand, Barker, and Jenkins

1980;Tarnopolsky, Jenkins, Watkins, and Hand

1980;Tarnopolsky and Morton-Williams

1980;Tarnopolsky, Watkins, and Hand

1980;Watkins, Tarnopolsky, and Jenkins 1981

Notes: Reports of some psychiatric symptoms were related

to annoyance within high noise level areas. 

Question order experiments were conducted. A

detailed follow-up survey was conducted with 77

women (UKD-305).

UKD-157 1977 London Area Panel Survey

Date: 1977 (December), 1978 (September)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: London area (6 sites)

N=: 1,363 interviews from 507 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Atkins Research and Development 1979;Griffiths,

Langdon, and Swan 1980;Langdon and Griffiths

1982

Notes: The same interview questions were asked of a

panel of respondents at different times of the year. 

Some 364 respondents were interviewed four

times. Alternative question wordings, question

instructions, and question ordering were examined. 

The monetary evaluation of noise nuisance was

examined.

UKD-160 1977 Hampshire Village Noise Study

Date: 1977 (October) to 1978 (January)

Source: Community, Road traffic

Location: U.K.: 10 villages in Hampshire and Wiltshire

N=: 756

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hawkins 1979b;Hawkins 1979a;Hawkins

1980;McEntagart 1980;Prescott-Clarke 1978

Notes: Residents are no more annoyed by traffic noise of

the same noise level in these rural areas than they

were in an earlier survey of the general population

of England (UKD-072). Respondents liked some

sounds in their environment.

UKD-161 1977 Southampton Hovercraft Noise Survey

Date: 1977

Source: Hovercraft

Location: U.K.: Neighborhoods near Southampton Water

N=: 241

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Samra 1978

Notes: In some areas hovercraft noise was as disturbing as

road traffic noise.

UKD-162 Greater Manchester Traffic Survey

Date: 1977 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Greater Manchester area

N=: 846

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Berry 1983;Rossall 1978;Wilcox 1978;Yeowart,

Wilcox, and Rossall 1977b;Yeowart, Wilcox, and

Rossall 1977a

Notes: Nighttime noise from vehicles aided in predicting

reactions to noise.

UKD-175 1978 Southampton Hovercraft Terminal Noise

Survey

Date: 1978

Source: Hovercraft

Location: U.K.: Southampton area near Hovercraft Terminal

N=: 52

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hutton 1978

Notes: Hovercraft noise is more annoying than other noise

sources near the terminal area. The survey was

designed for comparison with the 1977 Solent

Hovercraft Survey (UKD-161).

UKD-176 1978 ISVR Lab/Field Comparison Survey

Date: 1978 (June, July)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: one neighborhood in Southampton, England

N=: 60

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Flindell 1979;Flindell 1982

Notes: As part of a laboratory/field comparison study, the

residents were first interviewed at home and then

brought into a simulated living room listening

facility to rate recorded traffic noise. Annoyance

in the laboratory was not affected by the home

noise environment.

UKD-182 1979 Heathrow/Gatwick Sleep Study

Date: 1979 (June to October)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Two airports (17 sites near Heathrow, 8 sites

near Gatwick)

N=: 964 face-to-face, 3,188 postal

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Davies, Brooker, and Critchley 1987;Directorate of

Operational Research and Analysis

1980b;Directorate of Operational Research and
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-56-

Analysis 1980a;Directorate of Operational

Research and Analysis 1980c;Directorate of

Operational Research and Analysis

1980e;Directorate of Operational Research and

Analysis 1980d;Directorate of Operational

Research and Analysis 1980f;Makinson 1979

Notes: Both face-to-face interviews and postal

questionnaires were used. The nighttime noise

environment was measured. Some questions were

asked about experiences on the previous night. In

Great Britain this survey is known as the "Aircraft

Noise and Sleep Disturbance" survey. A large

scale preliminary study was also carried out (UKD147).

UKD-199 1978 Darlington Quiet Town Survey

Date: 1978 (June)

Source: Community

Location: U.K.: Probability sample of Darlington

N=: 488

Noise data: No

Reference: Jupp and Landon 1978

Notes: This follows an earlier study (UKD-132) of the

Darlington Quiet Town Experiment. After two

years, most respondents were aware of the quiet

city campaign. Noise annoyance was not reduced

in the neighborhoods.

UKD-220 1978 British Interior Noise Survey

Date: 1978 (November)

Source: Interior noise from adjacent dwellings

Location: U.K.: Great Britain

N=: 917

Noise data: Yes: sound insulation information

Reference: Langdon, Buller, and Scholes 1981

Notes: None

UKD-224 1982 Manchester Night Noise Survey

Date: 1982 (September 11 to September 26)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Six sites around Manchester airport

N=: 595

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Brooker and Nurse 1983;Monkman 1983;MortonWilliams 1983;Nurse 1983

Notes: Respondents completed self-administered

questionnaires on the morning following a night

when noise data had been collected. The

questionnaire included questions about that night's

sleep experience. Findings about reports of sleep

disturbance can be compared to an earlier study

around Heathrow and Gatwick (UKD-182).

UKD-225 1982 British Helicopter Disturbance Study

Date: 1982 (August 20 to September 13)

Source: Helicopters

Location: U.K.: Five areas affected by the Gatwick-Heathrow

helicopter airlink and two areas near Aberdeen

airport

N=: 438

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Atkins 1983;Atkins, Brooker, and Critchley

1983;Atkinson 1983;Prescott-Clarke 1983

Notes: None

UKD-233 1980 British Flats' Sound Insulation Survey

Date: 1980 (August, September)

Source: Interior noise

Location: U.K.: 63 sites with multistory residential

apartments (England and Wales)

N=: 709

Noise data: Yes: sound insulation information

Reference: Langdon, Buller, and Scholes 1983

Notes: The main interest was in the sound insulation from

noise originating in other flats. Other sources of

noise in the building were also found to be

important. Respondents were more annoyed by

impact sounds from overhead flats, than by

airborne sound. Physical measures of the impact

sound insulation were not related to occupants'

experiences. Comparisons are made with an

earlier survey of residents in other types of housing

structures (UKD-220).

UKD-237 1983-84 Southern England New Road Opening

Survey

Date: 1983-1984

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Eight sites with noise level reductions

(Bedfordshire, Essex, Kent, Suffolk) or increases

(Surrey, Alderney (Dorset))

N=: 469 in "before" survey, 391 in "after" survey

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griffiths and Raw 1984;Griffiths and Raw

1986;Griffiths and Raw 1989;Raw and Griffiths

1990

Notes: A total of 469 residents were interviewed from one

to four months before the opening of a new road

(one site was in the process of changes). Of these,

391 were reinterviewed two to three months after

the opening of the new road. In a later study

(UKD-297) 17 to 22 months later, 90 were

reinterviewed.

UKD-238 1984 Glasgow Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

Date: 1984 (May, June)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-57-

Location: U.K.: Glasgow airport

N=: 608

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Atkinson, Critchley, and Devine 1985;Diamond

and Rice 1987;Diamond and Walker

1986a;Diamond and Walker 1986b;Diamond,

Walker, Critchley, and Richmond 1986;Richmond

1985;Walker 1986

Notes: This survey was designed under Commission of

European Communities auspices for comparison

with an Orly Survey (FRA-239) and a Schiphol

Survey (NET-240).

UKD-241 1982 Heathrow Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

Date: 1982 (July, September)

Source: Aircraft, Road traffic

Location: U.K.: London Heathrow Airport

N=: 417

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Cooper, Diamond, Rice, and Walker 1984a

Notes: The sample is located in five aircraft noise areas

with a high and low ambient noise site in each. 

This study was conducted as an extension of the

1982 Aircraft Noise Index Study (UKD-242). 

Ambient noise does not consistently influence

aircraft noise annoyance.

UKD-242 1982 United Kingdom Aircraft Noise Index Study

Date: 1982 (July to September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: 5 airports (Heathrow, Gatwick, Luton,

Manchester, Aberdeen)

N=: 2,097

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Atkins, Nurse, and Richmond 1984;Brooker

1983;Brooker, Critchley, Monkman, and

Richmond 1985;Brooker and Richmond

1985a;Brooker and Richmond 1985b;PrescottClarke 1983

Notes: Results from a 1980 pilot survey were not reported. 

LAeq provides a better weighting of number of

events than does NNI. A 1982 ambient noise

survey (UKD-241) was conducted as an extension

of this study. The survey is sometimes labeled the

"ANIS" study.

UKD-243 1981 United Kingdom General Aviation Airport

Survey

Date: 1981 (Summer, Early Autumn)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Coventry, Kidlington, Leavesden, Shoreham,

Staverton

N=: 399

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Brooker 1982;Brooker and Davies 1983;Brooker

and Davies 1984;Diamond, Walker, Ollerhead,

Critchley, and Bradshaw 1987;Directorate of

Operational Research and Analysis 1982b;Taylor

Nelson & Associates 1982

Notes: Noise annoyance at one general aviation airport

(Leavesden) is similar to large airports. Residents

at the other general aviation airports are less

annoyed.

UKD-266 1971-72 Alton By-pass Study (Residents)

Date: 1971 (July), 1972 (July)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Alton, Bentley (Hampshire)

N=: 388 interviews (fewer respondents)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Dawson 1973

Notes: Some 225 respondents from 135 homes were

interviewed in July 1971. After the September

bypass opening, 163 respondents from 97 homes

were interviewed in July of 1972. Some homes

(48) were included in both studies. Some

interviews came from areas unaffected by the

bypass. A different interview was administered to

a sample of pedestrians and people in shops and

offices.

UKD-267 1970s Lake District A66 Traffic Change Study

(Residents)

Date: 1973, 1977, 1978 (August and September in all

years)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Lake District (Vicinity of Cockermouth and

Keswick)

N=: 1,596 (794 in 1973, 775 in 1977/1978)

Noise data: No (Information was only presented on numbers of

vehicles.)

Reference: Prescott-Clarke 1974;Prescott-Clarke

1977;Prescott-Clarke 1979;Prescott-Clarke 1980

Notes: Different samples of residents were interviewed in

1973 (construction started in 1974) and in 1977

and 1978 shortly after construction was completed. 

The changes in the road were seen as

improvements by both residents and visitors.

UKD-268 TRRL Multiple-Site Road Traffic Flow Change

Study (Residents)

Date: 1975-1976 for at least some sites (Tring: June

1975, September 1975, around December 1976;

Mere: May 1976, September 1976; Boughton,

Bridge, and Dunkirk: 1976)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Tring, Mere, Bridge, Lewes, East Grinstead,
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-58-

Ludlow, Leeds (2 locations), Boughton (Only

surveyed after change)

N=: At least 832 interviews from at least 582

respondents. (Tring: 132 before change, 126 after

change; Mere: 137 before, 123 after; Boughton:

165 after; Dunkirk 28 after; Bridge 113 [before and

after combined]:)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griffiths and Raw 1989;Langdon and Griffiths

1982;Mackie and Davies 1981;Mackie and Forster

1978;Mackie and Griffin 1977;Mackie and Griffin

1978b;Mackie and Griffin 1978a

Notes: At most study sites, residents were interviewed

both before and after road traffic flows changed. 

Traffic was reduced at most sites by new bypasses. 

In Leeds, however, a lorry control scheme

decreased noise levels at one site and increased

noise at another. Five sites were reinterviewed 6 to

7 years later in another study (UKD-298).

UKD-270 1983 English Road Traffic Vibration Survey

Date: 1983 (April)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Southern England

N=: 1,625 over 50 sites

Noise data: Yes: noise and vibration data

Reference: Watts 1984;Watts 1985;Watts 1987

Notes: Measured noise levels are analyzed with respect to

vibration annoyance. It was not possible to

determine whether measured vibration levels are

significantly related to vibration annoyance. Noise

was more annoying than vibration at all surveyed

sites.

UKD-277 TRRL Four-Road Laboratory/Field Comparison

Study

Date: 1980 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Four roads in Berkshire and Surrey

N=: 173

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Rosman 1980

Notes: Respondents were recruited for a related laboratory

study. After arriving at the laboratory they

answered a self-administered questionnaire about

their living experiences at home on their own road. 

They also rated the other roads during a visual and

auditory presentation in the laboratory. Laboratory

assessments were not affected by the subject's own

home environment. The laboratory assessments

were not substitutes for home assessments.

UKD-284 1983 English 11-Site Gypsy Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1983 (February, March)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.:11 temporary gypsy camp sites in Surrey

N=: 149

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griffiths, Raw, Hill, and Storrar 1985;Surrey

County Council 1983

Notes: These gypsies lived in mobile homes and were not

permanently settled at the sites. They reported less

noise annoyance with the same noise exposure than

had a stable population in a previous survey (UKD157).

UKD-296 1985 Great Britain Neighborhood Noise Survey

Date: 1985 (November)

Source: Community (especially noise from neighbors)

Location: U.K.: Representative probability sample

N=: 4,886 structured interviews (31 semi-structured,

follow-up interviews)

Noise data: No

Reference: Utley and Keighley 1988

Notes: Noise from neighbors and other people nearby was

the most widespread source of noise disturbance

(i.e., even more annoying than traffic noise). 

Noise disturbance was measured on few questions

included in a multi-purpose, national omnibus

opinion survey.

UKD-297 1985 Follow-up of 1983 New Road Opening

Survey

Date: 1985 (March, April)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Coggeshall, Ampthill, Beccles

N=: 90

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griffiths and Raw 1989

Notes: Respondents had previously been interviewed

before the reduction in noise environment and at

two to three months after the change in noise

environment (UKD-237). In the present survey,

17-22 months after the change, annoyance was still

higher than predicted from some other surveys.

UKD-298 1985 Follow-up of TRRL Multiple-Site Traffic

Flow Change Study

Date: 1985

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Boughton, Bridge, Mere, Lewes, East

Grinstead

N=: 430

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Griffiths and Raw 1989

Notes: After a gap of from seven to nine years, interviews

were repeated in five of a previous survey's study

areas both before and after changes in traffic noise
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-59-

environments (UKD-268). New residents are

more annoyed than those who experienced the

change.

UKD-305 1980-83 Noise Sensitivity Follow-up Survey

Date: 1980 (July-September), 1983 (November,

December)

Source: Aircraft noise

Location: U.K.: West London areas near Heathrow airport

N=: 137 (77 respondents, 60 reinterviewed in 1983)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Stansfeld 1983;Stansfeld 1988;Stansfeld

1992;Stansfeld, Clark, Jenkins, and Tarnopolsky

1985a;Stansfeld, Clark, Jenkins, and Tarnopolsky

1985b

Notes: A total of 77 women participants in a 1977

Heathrow survey (UKD-148) were interviewed in

1980. In 1983, 60 of the participants completed an

additional self-administered questionnaire and

provided psychological and physiological data. 

Some differences were found between high and low

noise-sensitive subjects.

UKD-309 1977 Hamble Airfield Survey

Date: 1977 (October) to 1978 (January)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Hamble

N=: 445 (probability sample within 3 miles of airport)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis

1982a;Stowell and Makinson 1979

Notes: The airfield is almost entirely a training center for

single and twin-piston engine aircraft. Annoyance

is not related to 12-hour NNI. Most respondents

were below 35 NNI. The amount of annoyance

was similar to that below 35 NNI around London

Heathrow airport.

UKD-324 1986 English General Aviation Survey

Date: 1986 (July to September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Wycombe, Elstree, Shoreham, Southampton, 

Biggin Hill

N=: 390

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Atkinson, Critchley, and Devine 1988;Diamond,

Ollerhead, Bradshaw, Walker, and Critchley

1988;Diamond, Walker, Ollerhead, Critchley, and

Bradshaw 1987

Notes: Some evidence suggests that general aviation noise

is more annoying than scheduled air traffic noise.

UKD-325 1989-91 TRL 15-Site Traffic Change Study

Date: 1989 (February) to 1991 (January)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.

N=: 1,407

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Baughan and Huddart 1992;Baughan and Huddart

1993

Notes: Noise reactions were different from those found for

steady-state conditions in another study (UKD351).

UKD-339 1991 United Kingdom Four-Airport Sleep Survey

Date: 1991 (March to August)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.

N=: 1,636

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Diamond, Reyner, Horne, and Brooks 2000;Jones

and Ollerhead 1992;Ollerhead et al.

1992;Ollerhead and Diamond 1993;Ollerhead and

Jones 1993;Pearsons, Tabachnick, and Fidell

2000;Porter, Kershaw, and Ollerhead

2000;Robertson, Flindell, Jiggins, Wright, and

Turner 2000

Notes: This social survey was part of a more extensive

series of nightly observation of indicators of sleep

disturbance patterns.

UKD-347 1990 Manchester Airport Sleep Survey

Date: 1990 (May)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: 9 communities around Manchester Airport

N=: 900 households

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hume and Thomas 1993

Notes: Responses were gathered using a computer-aided

telephone interview.

UKD-351 1988 TRL 35-Site Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1988 (October to December)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.

N=: 1,646

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Baughan and Huddart 1992;Baughan and Huddart

1993;Huddart and Baughan 1993

Notes: This study's results provide a steady-state baseline

for comparisons to changing noise environments in

another study (UKD-325).

UKD-355 1990 East London Docklands Light Rail Survey

Date: 1990

Source: Light railway

Location: U.K.: East London

N=: 149
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-60-

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Shield 1992;Shield and Zhukov 1992;Shield and

Zhukov 1993

Notes: Mail questionnaires were used at 16 sites. The

effect of low frequency noise is investigated.

UKD-422 1997 English Residential Soundproofing Survey

Date: 1997 (July, August)

Source: Interior (neighbors in flats)

Location: U.K.: many areas in England

N=: 147 (approximately 200 conducted, but only 147

analyzed due to uncertainty about insulation

conditions)

Noise data: Yes: sound insulation information

Reference: Grimwood and Tinsdeall 1998

Notes: The study concluded that residents do not rate the

noise insulation properties of their dwellings

directly, but rather base their subjective

impressions on the noises heard.

UKD-423 1991 England/Wales Environmental Noise Survey

Date: 1991 (November)

Source: Many types of environmental noises

Location: U.K.: England and Wales

N=: 2,373

Noise data: No

Reference: Grimwood 1993;Grimwood, Ling, and Wright

1998

Notes: Respondents from a representative sample were

asked about many noise sources. No noise

information is available.

UKD-424 1999 Bristol Community Noise Survey

Date: 1999 (July, August)

Source: Many community noise sources

Location: U.K.: Bristol

N=: 543

Noise data: No noise data described

Reference: Diamond et al. 2000;Hayward 1999;Smith,

Hayward, and Rich 2000;Smith and Rich 2000

Notes: The study investigates relationships between noise

exposure, noise sensitivity, noise disturbed sleep,

and health using a postal survey. A second phase

survey was conducted in 2000 but a report had not

been issued by the end of 2000.

UKD-425 1990s UK Road Resurfacing Survey

Date: 1994 (June), 1995 (June), 1998 (June) ( road

resurfacing between first two surveys)

Source: Motorway traffic

Location: U.K.: 4 rural villages

N=: 728 interviews from 182 respondents over three

survey years

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Baughan, Chinn, Harris, and Stait 2000

Notes: The study examined the effect of resurfacing with

porous asphalt on road traffic noise levels and on

residents' perceptions of those noise levels.

UKD-426 UK Road Traffic and Ischemic Heart Disease Study

Date: 1984 - 1988 (Caerphilly), 1982 - 85 (Speedwell)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: Caerphilly(South Wales) and Speedwell

(England)

N=: 3,997,(3,930 with complete information) Analyses

for 3,930 men for whom complete information was

available.

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Babisch, Ising, Elwood, Sharp, and Bainton

1993;Babisch, Ising, and Gallacher 2000;Babisch,

Ising, Gallacher, Sweetnam, and Elwood

1998;Babisch, Ising, Gallacher, Sweetnam, and

Elwood 1999;Stansfeld, Gallacher, Babisch, and

Elwood 1993;Stansfeld, Gallacher, Babisch, and

Shipley 1996;Stansfeld, Gallacher, Sharp, and

Babisch 1993

Notes: The primary objective is to study the relationship

between road traffic noise and Ischemic heart

disease in men more than 45 years of age. In the

second phase of the study, face-to-face interviews

were administered when men came to a clinic.

UKD-427 1996-97 Heathrow Area Children Noise Survey

Date: 1996 ( baseline), 1997 (follow-up)

Source: Aircraft, limited information on other sources

Location: U.K.: 8 primary schools near London Heathrow

Airport

N=: 615 from 340 children(340 primary school

children in 1996: 275 were surveyed again in

1997)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Haines and Stansfeld 2000;Haines, Stansfeld, Job,

and Berglund 1998

Notes: School children provided information about their

annoyance in their homes. The questions were

read to the children as a class group. Of the 340

children surveyed in 1996, 275 were surveyed

again in 1997.

UKD-436 London/Birmingham Converted Flats Survey

Date: 1991 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Interior noise, Exterior noise (limited information)

Location: U.K.: London, Birmingham

N=: 422 (additional interviews were obtained from 197

neighbors living above respondents) and 181

neighbors living below respondents)

Noise data: Noise measurements were being made at the time

of the 1991 publication
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-61-

Reference: Raw and Oseland 1991

Notes: The study was conducted to determine what factors

influence response to noise in houses converted to

flats. About 50 percent of the respondents felt that

the sound insulation between flats was poor.

UKD-481 UK 30-Site Noise Insulation Treatment Evaluation

Survey

Date: 1983 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.K.: 30 sites in 10 cities

N=: 882

Noise data: Yes: measures of both exterior exposures and

attenuation

Reference: Sargent 1984;Utley, Buller, Keighley, and Sargent

1986;Utley, Keighley, and Sargent 1983

Notes: Respondents gave their opinions about the sound

insulation package that had been installed in their

homes. Only about 8 percent reported that the

sound insulation package as a whole was

unsatisfactory, but many more disliked the

ventilator part of the package. A separate pilot

study was conducted with 94 respondents at three

sites.

UKD-482 1999-2000 UK 5-Airport Night Noise Perception

Survey

Date: 1999 (November) - 2000 (January plus a few

outside this period)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: 20 sites at 5 airports (Heathrow, East

Midlands, Gatwick, Manchester, Stansted)

N=: 1,531

Noise data: No

Reference: Diamond et al. 2000;Diamond, Smith, Hayward,

Heatherley, and Sheppard 2000

Notes: The study was designed to identify the nature and

extent to which residents perceive their lives are

impacted by noise at night. This is a face-to-face

interview survey, but a related mail survey was also

conducted (UKD-489).

UKD-483 1999 Manchester Nighttime Aircraft Noise Trial

Methodology Study

Date: 1999 (September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: Manchester airport

N=: 18 respondents on several nights (9 respondents

each from high and low noise areas)

Noise data: Yes: inside and outside

Reference: Flindell et al. 2000;Robertson, Flindell, Jiggins,

Wright, and Turner 2000

Notes: This trial study was conducted for planning

another study (UKD-339). The study tested

alternative methods for measuring the effects of

aircraft noise during sleeping periods. Subjects

were instrumented each night and then slept at

their home. Awakenings were measured with

instruments and with a questionnaire completed

the next morning.

UKD-484 1992-94 Great Britain Insulation Complaint

Survey

Date: 1992 (April) to 1994 (March)

Source: Neighbors, Any interior sounds from outside a flat

Location: U.K.: England and Wales

N=: 80 (one occupant and one neighbor for each of 40

flats)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Grimwood 1997

Notes: Residents who had earlier complained to

authorities about noise were interviewed. Many

complainants live in dwellings with insulation

below the generally accepted standard, but some

are dissatisfied even when the noise insulation

standards were met. In some cases this is due to

types of noise that are not controlled by

regulations.

UKD-489 1999-2000 UK 4-Airport Night Noise Mail Survey

Date: 1999 (November, December) - 2000 (primarily in

January)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.K.: 19 sites at 4 airports (Heathrow, East

Midlands, Manchester, Coventry)

N=: 672

Noise data: No

Reference: Diamond et al. 2000;Diamond, Smith, Hayward,

Heatherley, and Sheppard 2000

Notes: A postal questionnaire was followed by two

followup mailings. A related face-to-face survey

was also conducted (UKD448).

UKD-512 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Britain)

Date: 1980 or/and 1981

Source: Sounds from neighbors

Location: U.K.

N=: 110

Noise data: No

Reference: Florentine, Namba, and Kuwano 1986;Namba and

Kuwano 1986;Namba, Kuwano, and Schick

1986;Thomas, Namba, Schick, and Kuwano 1983

Notes: University students answered this written

questionnaire's general statements about neighbors'

noise without direct reference to their present

residence. There are some differences between

perceptions and attitudes toward neighbors' noise

in England, Germany and Japan. The
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-62-

questionnaire is nearly identical to

questionnaires administered in Japan (JPN510), Germany (GER-511), China (CHI-514),

and the United States (USA-513).

USA-004 1953 USA Eight-Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1953 (Spring and Fall)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Eight airports in 7 cities (Atlanta,

Chicago, Memphis, Miami, Minneapolis,

Philadelphia, St. Louis, Idlewild (New York), La

Guardia (New York))

N=: 3,635

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Borsky 1954;Borsky 1961a

Notes: Fear and aircraft noise annoyance are related.

USA-006 1957 USA Air Force Base Noise Survey

Date: 1957 (May to July), (Pilot in June, July 1956)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: One East coast and one West coast

Tactical Air Command Base (Also a pilot study at

a West coast Strategic Air Command base)

N=: 1,598 in main study, (732 in pilot study)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Borsky 1961a;Borsky 1961b

Notes: This is one of the first studies of reactions to jet

aircraft noise. Annoyance is increased by fear of

aircraft crashes. One report presents results from

several rounds of preliminary unstructured

interviews (Borsky, 1961a).

USA-007 1961 St Louis Sonic Boom Study

Date: 1961 (November, December), 1962 (January)

Source: Sonic booms from military aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: St. Louis Area

N=: Approximately 2,200 interviews from

approximately 1,157 respondents

Noise data: No

Reference: Borsky 1962;Nixon and Borsky 1966;Nixon and

Hubbard 1965

Notes: A total of 1,043 respondents were reinterviewed. 

Both telephone and face-to-face interviews were

used for the reinterview. Some interviews were

carried out to test for reinterviewing effects and to

test for differences between face-to-face and

telephone interviewing.

USA-012 1964 Oklahoma City Sonic Boom Study

Date: 1964

Source: Sonic booms from military aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Oklahoma City area

N=: 8,997 interviews from approximately 3,200

respondents

Noise data: No

Reference: Borsky 1965;Hilton, Huckel, Steiner, and Maglieri

1964;Maglieri and Sothcott 1990

Notes: Most original respondents were reinterviewed

twice by telephone. Some interviews were

conducted to test for reinterviewing effects and to

test for differences between telephone and face-toface interviews. Some changes occurred in the

questionnaire between waves.

USA-020 1966 USA Three-City Community Noise Study

Date: 1966

Source: Community, Road traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles, Boston, New York

N=: 259

Noise data: No

Reference: Bolt Beranek and Newman 1967

Notes: None

USA-022 1967 USA Four-Airport Survey (Phase I Tracor

Survey)

Date: 1967 (May to August)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: 4 airports; Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Los

Angeles

N=: 3,590

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Connor 1968;Connor and Patterson 1972;Connor

and Patterson 1976;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz

1991;Hazard 1968;Hazard 1971;Patterson

1975;Patterson and Connor 1973;Schultz

1978;Tracor Inc 1971

Notes: This is the first of three surveys (USA-044, USA032). This first survey's questionnaire differed

substantially from the other two.

USA-023 1967-68 SR-71 Supersonic Aircraft Noise Study

Date: 1967-1968

Source: Sonic booms

Location: U.S.A.: Six metropolitan areas; Atlanta, Chicago

Dallas, Denver, Los Angeles, Minneapolis

N=: 6,375 interviews (Some respondents were

interviewed more than once.)

Noise data: No

Reference: Tracor Inc 1970

Notes: Some interviews were held before, during and after

the supersonic overflights. The questionnaire was

altered between interview phases. The study

includes a subsample of complainants.

USA-027 1968 LAX Aircraft Noise Study

Date: 1968 (October)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles International Airport
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-63-

N=: 200

Noise data: No

Reference: Zamarin, Langdon, and Gabriel 1971

Notes: This was a qualitative planning study for the 1969

LAX study (USA-031).

USA-031 1969 LAX Aircraft Noise Study

Date: 1969 (Autumn)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles International Airport

N=: 500

Noise data: No

Reference: Burrows and Zamarin 1972;Zamarin, Langdon,

and Gabriel 1971

Notes: None

USA-032 1969 USA Three-Airport Survey (Phase II Tracor

Survey)

Date: 1969 (July to November)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Three Airports; Boston, Miami, New York

N=: 2,912

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Connor and Patterson 1972;Connor and Patterson

1976;Edmiston 1972;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz

1991;Hazard 1971;Patterson 1975;Patterson and

Connor 1973;Schultz 1978;Tracor Inc 1971

Notes: This is the second of a series of three surveys

(USA-022, USA-044). The interview is almost

identical to the third survey's interview (USA-044).

USA-039 1969-70 San Francisco Three-Street Pilot Study

Date: 1969-1970

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: San Francisco

N=: 36

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Appleyard and Lintell 1972

Notes: This study explores a wide range of reactions and

behavior associated with many aspects of traffic

(including noise).

USA-040 1969 Inglewood Community Noise Survey

Date: 1969 (December)

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Inglewood (California)

N=: 13,000

Noise data: Yes for aircraft

Reference: Toward... 1972

Notes: The study is briefly described on pages 105 and

106 in the publication.

USA-043 Los Angeles Freeway Five-Site Study

Date: 1969 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Freeway traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles

N=: 325 (Five study sites)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Galloway, Clark, and Kerrick 1969

Notes: The relationship between noise level and

annoyance was very weak but statistically

significant.

USA-044 1970 USA Small City Airports (Small City Tracor

survey)

Date: 1970 (October) to 1971 (January)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Two airports; Chattanooga, Reno

N=: 1,,960

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Connor and Patterson 1972;Connor and Patterson

1976;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Patterson

1975;Patterson and Connor 1973;Schultz 1978

Notes: This is the third of a series of three surveys (USA022, USA-032). The interview is almost identical

to the second survey's interview (USA-032).

USA-047 1970 Minneapolis Freeway Noise Study

Date: 1970 (July, August)

Source: Expressway traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Interstate Highway I35W in Minneapolis,

Minnesota

N=: 148

Noise data: No

Reference: Bouchard 1970;Lambert 1971;Minnesota Dept.of

Transportation 1971

Notes: The 1972 Minneapolis Freeway Noise Barrier

Study (USA-069) was also conducted in this area.

USA-048 1970 C.R.P. Inglewood Community Noise Survey

Date: 1970 (January)

Source: Aircraft, Community

Location: U.S.A.: Inglewood (California)

N=: 5,500

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Toward... 1972

Notes: A mailed survey was used (13% response rate).

USA-049 1970 Cedar Rock Drive Neighborhood Noise

Investigation

Date: 1970

Source: Manufacturing plan

Location: U.S.A.: one neighborhood in Pickens, South

Carolina

N=: 17

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Hart, Reiter, and Royster 1972

Notes: Two of the 17 respondents were in business
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-64-

establishments. Only one question was asked

of each person. The study was used in a court

case.

USA-051 1971 J.F.K. Dynamic Preferential Runway System

Survey

Date: 1971 (August, September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: John F. Kennedy Airport (New York)

N=: 441

Noise data: No

Reference: Patterson, Edmiston, and Connor 1972

Notes: Study areas were chosen to provide a closely

comparable sample to that from the 1969 Tracor

study (USA-032) to study changes in reactions due

to a new dynamic preferential runway system at

J.F.K. The two-month trial period was too short a

time for an adequate evaluation.

USA-057 USA Vehicle Noise Situation Survey

Date: 1971 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Boston, Los Angeles, Detroit

N=: 1,201 (60 sites)

Noise data: Yes (for 20 sites)

Reference: Bolt Beranek and Newman 1971a;Bolt Beranek

and Newman 1971b;Franken 1971;Jones 1971

Notes: These telephone interviews followed a loosely

structured, conversational format. The survey

explored the "vehicle noise situations that

annoyed" respondents.

USA-058 Philadelphia Community Noise Survey

Date: 1969 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Philadelphia

N=: 500

Noise data: No

Reference: Bragdon 1969;Bragdon 1971

Notes: Length of residence does not affect annoyance.

USA-059 1972 J.F.K. Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (February, March, August, October)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: John F. Kennedy airport (New York)

N=: 2,930 interviews from 1465 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Borsky 1974b;Borsky 1975;Borsky 1976a;Borsky

1976b;Borsky and Leonard 1973;Leonard and

Borsky 1973

Notes: The initial face-to-face interviews were followed by

repeated interviews by telephone.

USA-060 1972 Portland Northshore Aircraft Survey

Date: 1972 (November)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Portland, Oregon

N=: 303

Noise data: No

Reference: Yaden and West 1972

Notes: None

USA-066 1972 BART Residential Impact Survey

Date: 1972

Source: Suburban railway system (Bay Area Rapid Transit

system)

Location: U.S.A.: San Francisco area

N=: 2,541

Noise data: No

Reference: Appleyard and Carp 1973;Carp and Carp

1982a;Carp and Carp 1982c;Carp and Carp

1982b;Carp, Zawadski, and Shokron 1976

Notes: The survey is part of a larger, multi-sample

assessment project. Trains were running on a trial

basis before the Bay Area Rapid Transit system

(BART) opened to passengers. Noise annoyance is

less for older respondents.

USA-067 1972 Boulder Community Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (March, April)

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Boulder, Colorado

N=: 917

Noise data: No

Reference: Chanaud 1972

Notes: Motorcycles, road traffic, and barking dogs are the

most important noise problems.

USA-068 1972 College Park Community Noise Survey

Date: 1972

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: College Park (Georgia)

N=: 280

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Lambert et al. 1973

Notes: Annoyance is not correlated with noise level.

USA-069 1972 Minneapolis Freeway Noise Barrier Study

Date: 1972 (June to August), 1973 (July, August)

Source: Expressway traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Interstate Highway I-35W at Minnehaha

Creek in Minneapolis, Minnesota

N=: 272 interviews (from about 205 respondents)

Noise data: Yes (for the first three rows of houses)

Reference: Lambert 1978;Lambert and Bouchard 1974

Notes: Residents were interviewed before and about seven

months after a barrier was installed. The barrier

reduced noise levels and annoyance. An earlier
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-65-

study (USA-047) had been conducted in the

same area.

USA-070 1972 Eastern USA Four-Community Highway

Noise Survey

Date: 1972

Source: Freeway traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Four communities (Bogota (New Jersey),

Towson (Maryland), North Springfield (Virginia),

Rosedale (Maryland))

N=: 1,114

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Gamble, Langley, Pashek, Sauerlender, and Twark

1973;Gamble, Sauerlender, and Langley

1974;Humphrey 1973

Notes: The study examined both positive and negative

effects of highways (including noise) on property

values.

USA-081 Boulder Newspaper Community Noise Survey

Date: 1972 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Boulder (Colorado)

N=: 215

Noise data: No

Reference: Chanaud 1972

Notes: Readers selected themselves by mailing in a form

printed in the Boulder Camera newspaper. 

Motorcycles, road traffic and barking dogs were

the most significant noise problems.

USA-082 1973 Los Angeles Airport Night Study

Date: 1973 (April to June)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles International Airport

N=: 1,417 interviews, from 940 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Fidell and Jones

1975;Schultz 1978

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted once before

and twice after late night flights were reduced. 

Interviews were conducted in both English and

Spanish. Annoyance was not reduced by the

reduction in nighttime noise exposure.

USA-083 1973 LAX Airport Noise Study

Date: 1973 (December)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles International Airport

N=: 880

Noise data: No

Reference: Olson Laboratories 1976;Opinion Research of

California 1975

Notes: None

USA-084 1973 J.F.K. Airport Noise Study

Date: 1973 (Autumn)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: John F. Kennedy Airport in New York

City

N=: 1,059

Noise data: No

Reference: Borsky 1974a

Notes: The primary purpose of the field survey was to

recruit laboratory subjects.

USA-085 1973 Seattle-Tacoma Airport Noise Study

Date: 1973 (May to July)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Seattle-Tacoma International Airport

(three community areas)

N=: 716

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fiedler and Fiedler 1974;Fiedler and Fiedler

1975;Hughes and Mabry 1976

Notes: About half of the respondents (those in a control

group) were interviewed by telephone. The

number of open windows and presence of outdoor

equipment were similar in high aircraft noise and

other areas. Two of the three study areas were far

from the airport and served as control groups.

USA-088 1973 U.S.C. Los Angeles Freeway Noise Study

Date: 1973 (July) to 1974 (January)

Source: Freeway traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles

N=: 696 from main sample (An additional 59

interviews from new freeway sites were not

analyzed.)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Jenkins, Pahl, Carroll, Alyassini, and Heller

1974;Jenkins and Pahl 1975;Small and Jenkins

1982;Small, Jenkins, and Carroll 1976;Small,

Jenkins, and Pahl 1974

Notes: Subjective feelings about noise are more closely

correlated with response to noise than behavioral

measures. Residents are annoyed by freeway noise

even if they do not report activity interference.

USA-089 1973 Portland-Multnomah Community Noise

Survey

Date: 1973 (September to November)

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: City of Portland and Multnomah County

(Oregon)

N=: 59

Noise data: No

Reference: MAN-Acoustics and Noise 1975

Notes: Motor vehicle noise is the largest contributor to
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-66-

noise annoyance.

USA-090 1973 E.P.A. Community Noise Questionnaire Pilot

Study

Date: 1973

Source: Community, Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles, New York

N=: 179

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Sutherland, Braden, and Colman 1973

Notes: The study was carried out in four diverse types of

areas to test an interview intended for general use

by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

USA-091 1973 Test of Real-Time Personal Annoyance

Monitoring Devices

Date: 1973

Source: Community, Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles

N=: 11

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Jones, and Pearsons 1973

Notes: The primary data consisted of time-coded ratings

of individual noise events that respondents sent

using a wrist-worn F.M. transmitter. A summary

questionnaire was also used. Some subjects also

described each noise event using a portable

microphone. The participants produced data that

were consistent with detailed analyses.

USA-095 U.S. Census Bureau Annual Housing Surveys

Date: 1976, 1977, 1979, 1981 1983

Source: Community, Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: National sample and selected Standard

Metropolitan Statistical Areas (SMSA)

N=: Approximately 70,000 national representative

interviews per year and approximately 5,000 to

15,000 additional interviews in selected

metropolitan areas.

Noise data: No

Reference: U.S.Department of Housing and Urban

Development 1976

Notes: This national survey included two noise questions

in 1976, 1977, 1979, 1981, and 1983. The noise

question wordings were not the same each year. 

The national sample interviews were repeated in

the same housing units each year.

USA-096 1974 Fort Campbell Area Helicopter Noise Survey

Date: 1974

Source: Helicopters

Location: U.S.A.: Near Fort Campbell in Kentucky and

Tennessee

N=: 213

Noise data: No (Some helicopter noise levels were measured

but not analyzed in publications.)

Reference: Broderson and Edwards 1976

Notes: The study evaluated proposed low-altitude flights

for 2,500 square miles surrounding Fort Campbell.

USA-102 1974 USA 24-Site Community Noise Survey

Date: 1974 (Spring)

Source: Community noise (neighborhood as well as road

traffic)

Location: U.S.A.: 24 sites in seven cities

N=: 2,037

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell 1977;Fidell 1978;Fidell, Barber, and Schultz

1991;Galloway 1977;Schultz 1978;Simpson,

Pearsons, Fidell, and Muehlenbeck 1974

Notes: Interviews were conducted by telephone for 1834

respondents and in person for 203 respondents.

USA-103 1974 Capital Beltway Survey

Date: 1974

Source: Freeway traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Suburb of Washington, D.C.

N=: 149

Noise data: No

Reference: Humphrey, Bradshaw, and Krout 1978

Notes: None

USA-104 1974 Boston Economic Impact Pretest

Date: 1974

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Boston Metropolitan Area

N=: 60

Noise data: No

Reference: Thorpe and Holmes 1976

Notes: The questionnaire was tested for inclusion in a

large study of the economic welfare effects of

noise.

USA-105 1974 San Francisco Livable Streets Survey

Date: 1974 (June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.S.A.: San Francisco

N=: 450

Noise data: No

Reference: Appleyard, Gerson, and Lintell 1980

Notes: None

USA-110 1975 J.F.K. Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1975 (Autumn)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: John F. Kennedy Airport (New York)

N=: 1,294

Noise data: No
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-67-

Reference: Borsky 1977

Notes: Interviews were conducted to support a laboratory

study program.

USA-117 1975 Boulder Noise Survey

Date: 1975 (Summer)

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Boulder (Colorado)

N=: 184

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Gourdin 1975

Notes: Motorcycles, road traffic, and barking dogs were

the most significant noise problems.

USA-127 1976-77 Dulles Concorde Noise Study

Date: 1976 (May, December), 1977 (May)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Dulles International Airport (Washington,

D.C.)

N=: 5,291 spread over three waves

Noise data: No (Four noise impacted areas werecharacterized

with the verbal labels:" high, medium, low, nonimpacted")

Reference: Bremond 1979a;Committee on Community

Reactions to Concorde 1977;Federal Aviation

Administration 1977;Kirschner Associates 1976

Notes: Telephone interviewing was conducted once before

and twice after Concorde began operations.

USA-128 1976 Orange County Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1976

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Orange County (California)

N=: 666

Noise data: Yes

Reference: POS Associates 1976

Notes: The 1976 study was prepared for the Orange

County Board of Supervisors. Some of the

questionnaire was used in a later 1977 survey

(USA-145).

USA-129 Albany/Louisville Aircraft Fear Study

Date: 1975 (November, December: Louisville), 1976

(June, July: Albany)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Albany (New York) and Louisville

(Kentucky)

N=: 200

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Loeb and Moran 1977;Moran, Gunn, and Loeb

1981

Notes: Respondents were interviewed after aircraft crashes

in sites near and distant from the crashes in Albany

(51 months after crash) and Louisville (six months

after crash). Respondents near crashes were more

fearful and more annoyed.

USA-143 1977-78 Three-Phase J.F.K. Concorde Noise Study

Date: 1977 (October, November), 1978 (May, June),

1978 (August, September)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: John F. Kennedy Airport (New York)

N=: 5,404 interviews from approximately 2,400 people

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Borsky 1978

Notes: Respondents were less annoyed during the one

winter interview than during the two summer

interviews. "No substantial differences" were found

between those reinterviewed and 400 new

respondents.

USA-144 1977-78 F.A.A. J.F.K. Concorde Noise Study

Date: 1977 (January to April), 1978 (January, February)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: John F. Kennedy Airport (New York)

N=: 2,020

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Federal Aviation Administration 1979

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted nine months

before and three months after Concorde began

operations. Respondents disapproved of the

decision to admit Concorde more before than after

operations began.

USA-145 1977 Orange County Airport Noise Study

Date: 1977 (January)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Orange County California

N=: 400

Noise data: Yes (for 200 respondents)

Reference: Opinion Research of California 1977

Notes: The study was prepared for the City of Newport

Beach. Some of the interview was designed for

comparison with a 1976 study (USA-128).

USA-154 1977 Youngmann Highway Noise Abatement

Study

Date: 1977 (August)

Source: Expressway traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Interstate Highway (I-290) in Amherst

(Buffalo), New York

N=: 160

Noise data: Yes

Reference: McColl 1979

Notes: Interviews were conducted before construction of a

noise barrier. The major noise problems were in

the first two rows of houses.
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-68-

USA-155 1977 Minnesota Five-Site Freeway Noise Barrier

Study

Date: 1977-1978

Source: Freeway traffic

Location: U.S.A.: 19 study areas in the Minneapolis-St. Paul

vicinity

N=: 756 questionnaires in the follow up survey, a

smaller number in the original survey

Noise data: No

Reference: Minnesota Dept.of Transportation 1980;Orlich

1979

Notes: Respondents complete a mail questionnaire both

before and after barrier installation in four areas

and only after installation in 15 areas. The

barriers were generally evaluated positively.

USA-156 1977 Ohio New Highway Survey

Date: 1977 (three months before January 1978 opening),

1978 (June), 1979(June)

Source: Road traffic

Location: U.S.A.: Ohio (a two-mile section along a new

motorway)

N=: 483 interviews (113 people interviewed three

times), 163 before opening, 163 for first follow-up

and 160 for second follow-up

Noise data: Yes: Noise data for after the highway opened.

Reference: Weinstein 1980;Weinstein 1982

Notes: Residents were interviewed 3 months before and 4

months and 16 months after a new highway

opened. Residents did not adapt between the time

of the 4-month and 16-month interviews. A

separate study of public protest and home

modifications was made at the last interview, but

no references for this study are in the publications.

USA-166 1978 Salt Lake Airport Noise Study

Date: 1978 (May)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Salt Lake City (4 areas)

N=: 353

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Systems Control 1978

Notes: Interviews were conducted by telephone. This was

an Aircraft Noise Control and Land Use

Compatibility study.

USA-167 1978-79 USA Helicopter Survey of Selected

Occupations

Date: 1978 (November), 1979 (February)

Source: Helicopters

Location: U.S.A.

N=: 272

Noise data: No

Reference: Edwards, Broderson, Barbour, McCoy, and

Johnson 1979;Edwards, Broderson, and Johnson

1980

Notes: Mail questionnaires were sent to wildlife refuge

managers, forest service employees, postmasters,

and national park superintendents. Information

about their perceptions of other people's responses

was also sought. Respondents reported about

reactions generally and thus may have included

work locations.

USA-170 1978 U.S. Army Impulse Noise Survey

Date: 1978 (July to September)

Source: Artillery, Helicopters

Location: U.S.A.: Vicinity of Ft. Bragg

N=: 2,147

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Schomer 1979;Schomer 1981a;Schomer

1981b;Schomer 1982;Schomer 1983b

Notes: None

USA-171 1978 Spokane Community Noise Survey

Date: 1978 (Summer)

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Spokane County

N=: 761

Noise data: No

Reference: Perdue 1979;Perdue and Coates 1979

Notes: The study is based on a probability sample. The

survey showed support for a community noise

control program. The interview was adapted from

the questionnaire developed for the U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency.

USA-172 1978 Kentucky Urban Noise Survey

Date: 1978

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Kentucky (20 sites)

N=: 845

Noise data: No (Respondents' exposures are not estimated from

the collected noise data.)

Reference: Broderson, Edwards, and Hauser 1979;Broderson,

Edwards, McCoy, and Coakley 1981

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were used. 

Surface transportation was the most annoying

noise source.

USA-179 1979 Oklahoma City Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1979 (February)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Seven areas near Will Rogers World

Airport (Oklahoma City)

N=: 406

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Systems Control 1979
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-69-

Notes: Interviews were conducted by telephone. This was

an Airport Noise Control and Land Use

Compatibility study.

USA-183 1979 Salt Lake City Community Noise Survey

Date: 1979 (July, August)

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Probability sample of Salt Lake City

N=: 451

Noise data: No

Reference: Fricks 1980

Notes: The interview was adapted from the questionnaire

developed for the U.S. Environmental Protection

Agency.

USA-186 1980 Bradley International Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1980 (February)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Connecticut around Bradley Airport

N=: 343

Noise data: Yes

Reference: CH2M Hill 1980

Notes: Randomly selected respondents were interviewed

by telephone. This was an Aircraft Noise Control

and Land Use Compatibility study.

USA-191 1979 Philadelphia Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1979 (November, December)

Source: Aircraft, Community

Location: U.S.A.: Philadelphia International Airport

N=: 1,723

Noise data: No

Reference: FAA 1980

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted.

USA-202 1978-79 Time-of-Day Study with Annoyance

Recording Device

Date: 1978

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Burbank (California), Atlanta (Georgia)

N=: 46

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Horonjeff and Teffeteller 1980

Notes: Respondents were asked to push a personal,

portable counter each time they were bothered by

aircraft noise as they went about their normal daily

activities. They were also asked to report counter

totals on a postcard four times a day. Brief prestudy and post-study questionnaires were also

completed.

USA-203 1979 Burbank Aircraft Noise Change Study

Date: 1979 (August) to 1980 (December)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Four areas around an airport in Burbank,

California

N=: 5,041 interviews from more than 1,000 people

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Fidell, Horonjeff,

Mills, Baldwin, Teffeteller, and Pearsons

1985;Fidell, Horonjeff, Teffeteller, and Pearsons

1981;Fidell and Pearsons 1985b;Fidell and

Pearsons 1985a;Griffiths and Raw 1985a;Griffiths

and Raw 1985b;Raw and Griffiths 1985

Notes: Interviews were carried out in four neighborhoods

at five times: once before closing one runway for

repairs, three times during the period the runway

was closed, and once after the runway was

reopened. Both telephone and face-to-face

interviews were used.

USA-204 1981 John Wayne Airport Operation Change Study

Date: 1981 (September to November)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: John Wayne Airport at Santa Ana,

California

N=: 3,105 interviews from more than 800 people

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Fidell, Horonjeff,

Mills, Baldwin, Teffeteller, and Pearsons

1985;Fidell, Mills, Teffeteller, and Pearsons 1982

Notes: Four rounds of telephone interviews were

conducted. The second, third, and fourth rounds

were each conducted after the introduction of new

flight departure procedures. Most respondents

were interviewed for only one round. Neither

exposure nor annoyance changed appreciably

during the study.

USA-205 1980 Bellevue Airport Noise Study

Date: 1980 (May)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Bellevue, Washington Airport

N=: 27

Noise data: No

Reference: Mabry 1982

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted. This small

survey was part of a larger study of general

aviation noise at four airports. The larger study

primarily focused on complaint data.

USA-206 1981 Alabama Three-Site Blast Noise Survey

Date: 1981 (February)

Source: Blasting (two surface coal mines and one quarry)

Location: U.S.A.: Communities around 3 blasting sites in

Alabama

N=: 1,042

Noise data: Yes: noise and vibration data
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-70-

Reference: Bullen and Job 1985;Fidell and Horonjeff

1982;Fidell and Horonjeff 1985;Fidell, Horonjeff,

Schultz, and Teffeteller 1982;Fidell, Horonjeff,

Schultz, and Teffeteller 1983;Kessler 1985

Notes: Interviews were conducted either face-to-face or by

telephone. Annoyance was related to ground

vibration levels. An unsuccessful attempt was

made to measure annoyance with individual blasts

using postcards.

USA-207 1980 John Wayne Airport (Orange County) Survey

Date: 1980 (March)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Communities around John Wayne (Orange

County) Airport

N=: 310

Noise data: Yes

Reference: VTN Consolidated 1980

Notes: Both telephone (240) and face-to-face interviews

(71) were conducted with a random sample of

residents. This was an Aircraft Noise Control and

Land Use Compatibility study.

USA-212 1972 Minneapolis St Paul Airport Development

Survey

Date: 1972 (July)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport

N=: 400

Noise data: No (Areas were characterized as "high impact

noise area" and "other".)

Reference: Mid-Continent Surveys 1972

Notes: Though there were some questions on noise, the

main subject of the survey was attitudes toward

airport development.

USA-213 1973 Chicago Construction Site Survey

Date: 1973 (June, July)

Source: Construction

Location: U.S.A.: 14 construction sites in the Chicago area

N=: 128

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Newman 1973

Notes: None

USA-215 1974 Los Angeles International Aircraft Noise

Survey

Date: 1974 (Winter and Spring)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles International Airport

N=: 164

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Gabriel, Langdon, Creamer, and Kushner 1981

Notes: None

USA-216 1978 Electrical Power Line and Transformer Noise

Survey

Date: 1978 (Spring)

Source: Electrical transformers and transmission lines

Location: U.S.A.: 17 sites in Southern California

N=: 133

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Teffeteller, and Pearsons 1979

Notes: Transmission line noise is less acceptable than

transformer noise of the same level.

USA-217 1980 Aircraft Rating Diary (Pilot) Study

Date: 1980 (August to October)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Torrance Municipal Airport (California)

N=: 18 subjects provided over 920 aircraft noise ratings

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Stearns, Brown, and Neiswander 1983

Notes: A face-to-face interview was used to recruit

residents. The study evaluated a method for rating

individual aircraft noise events. Respondents kept a

diary for five days by noting some information

about every aircraft noise event that bothered them

when they were at home. Both indoor and outdoor

noise measurements were made.

USA-219 1980 Salt Lake City In-Home Aircraft Rating

Study

Date: 1980 (Nov.)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Salt Lake City Airport

N=: 100 people provided 1164 ratings of individual

aircraft flyovers

Noise data: Yes for the individually rated noise events

Reference: Dempsey, Stephens, Fields, and Shepherd 1983

Notes: A self-administered questionnaire on the long-term

noise environment was answered by respondents at

the beginning of the rating session. The purpose of

the study was to rate individual aircraft flyovers

that occurred during the one-hour rating sessions.

USA-221 1977 Allentown Community Noise Survey

Date: 1977

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Allentown (Pennsylvania)

N=: 467

Noise data: No

Reference: Levine 1981

Notes: The study was used to develop community noise

study procedures for the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency. A final report on the study's

findings was not published.

USA-235 1983 Controlled Exposure Helicopter Noise Study
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-71-

Date: 1983 (August to November)

Source: Military helicopters

Location: U.S.A.: Newport News (Virginia)

N=: 338 people provided a total of 6345 interviews

Noise data: Yes (for the controlled noise exposure test days)

Reference: Fields and Powell 1985;Fields and Powell

1987;Powell and Fields 1984

Notes: The initial face-to-face interview was conducted

with 338 respondents. These respondents were

reinterviewed with a short interview on daily noise

reactions on up to 22 additional days. The

helicopter noise exposure was controlled and

measured on 17 of the 22 follow-up study days.

USA-245 1970s LAX Six-Community Noise Survey

Date: 1972 (August)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles International Airport

(Inglewood, El Segundo, Westchester, Emerson

Manor, West Westchester, Lennox)

N=: 239

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Clary 1974;Goodman and Clary 1976

Notes: This telephone survey examines factors that

explain political activism with respect to noise.

USA-250 1982 Decatur General Aviation Airport Survey

Date: 1982 (March)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A: Decatur (Illinois)

N=: 234

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Barber, and Schultz 1991;Schomer 1983a

Notes: Interviews were obtained with both telephone and

face-to-face techniques.

USA-251 Two-Neighborhood San Francisco Airport Survey

Date: 1974 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Foster City and Fremont (San Francisco

area)

N=: 552

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Graeven 1974

Notes: Self-administered questionnaires were personally

distributed to female residents. Numbers of

reported health problems are related to aircraft

noise annoyance but only weakly, if at all, to

aircraft noise levels.

USA-299 1966 Edwards Air Force Base Resident Sonic

Boom Survey

Date: 1966 (July)

Source: Sonic booms from military aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Edwards Air Force Base (California)

N=: 783

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Kryter, Johnson, and Young 1968

Notes: On-base residents returned a mail questionnaire to

rate sonic booms and other noise environments for

June (approximately 10 booms per day, 1.7 p.s.f.

median nominal peak overpressure) and for prior

months. Some 26% reported that the June sonic

boom environment was unacceptable.

USA-300 1975 Rutgers Freshmen Dormitory Noise

Sensitivity Study

Date: 1975 (August), 1976 (April)

Source: Noise inside college dormitory

Location: U.S.A.: A dormitory at Rutgers State University

(New Jersey)

N=: 155 (55 participated in full study)

Noise data: No

Reference: Weinstein 1978

Notes: A mail questionnaire on noise sensitivity was

returned by 155 entering freshmen before

beginning the school year. Later in the school year

24 high-sensitive and 31 low-sensitive students in

one dormitory rated their disturbance from noise in

the dormitory. Disturbance increased for the

sensitive but remained the same for the lowsensitive students.

USA-301 1982 Westchester Airport Nighttime Noise Change

Study

Date: 1982 (May 1-3, "before" phase; June 26-28, "after"

phase)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Four areas around Westchester Country

Airport (New York)

N=: 1,465 (725, "before round; 740, "after round")

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Baldwin and Fidell 1982;Fidell, Barber, and

Schultz 1991;Fidell, Horonjeff, Mills, Baldwin,

Teffeteller, and Pearsons 1985

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted before and

about seven weeks after nighttime flight

restrictions were changed. There was no unusual

observed change in nighttime flights and,

correspondingly, no observed change in noise

reactions.

USA-308 1979 Salt Lake City Stationary Noise Source

Survey

Date: 1979 (June, July)

Source: Stationary neighborhood noises (dogs, sirens,

people, etc.)

Location: U.S.A: Salt Lake City
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-72-

N=: 63

Noise data: No

Reference: Alvord 1988

Notes: Residents were re interviewed who had indicated

in a 1979 survey (USA-183) that they were most

annoyed by a common neighborhood noise such as

dogs, sirens, garbage trucks, or people. The most

annoying aspects of these sounds were reported to

be loudness, quality of sound and time and

frequency of occurrence.

USA-310 1972 Los Angeles Airport Relocated Residents

Survey

Date: 1972 (September, October)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Los Angeles

N=: 50

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Clary 1974;Goodman and Clary 1976

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted with

respondents whose homes had been purchased by

the airport. Some had moved away from the

airport area and others remained in their homes.

USA-338 1981 USA Air Force Base Study

Date: 1981 (Some interviews may have been in 1982.)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: 7 air bases (Dover, Mather, George,

March, Marana, Carswell, Pope)

N=: 942

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Borsky 1983

Notes: Interviews were conducted near seven US Air

Force bases.

USA-349 Atlanta Airport Acoustical Insulation Survey

Date: 1991 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A: Atlanta

N=: 937

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell and Silvati 1991

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted with

residents of both treated and untreated homes. 

Treated residences had been noise-insulated at

least eight months before the survey. Annoyance

was not lower in the noise insulated homes.

USA-375 1993-95 Western USA Sonic Boom Study

Date: 1993 (April, May, December), 1995 (November)

Source: Sonic booms

Location: U.S.A.: Nevada (6 communities), California (8

communities)

N=: 1,573 interviews with 1,356 residents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fields 1996;Fields 1997;Fields, Moulton,

Baumgartner, and Thomas 1994

Notes: Interviews were conducted with residents in areas

with long-term exposure to sonic booms. Some

respondents were interviewed twice. Reactions

were more severe in one area than the other. 

Reactions were generally more severe to sonic

booms than would be expected from conventional

aircraft with the same exposure as measured in

LAeq.

USA-428 1996 Minneapolis-St Paul Aircraft Mitigation

Preference Survey

Date: 1996 (May 15 to June 1)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport 

(19 geographical areas in 9 communities)

N=: 2,880 (19 areas)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Silvati, and Howe 1996

Notes: Interviews were conducted by telephone. Residents

were asked about their preferences for future noise

mitigation strategies.

USA-429 1999 Minneapolis-St Paul Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1999 (June)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Minneapolis-St. Paul International

Airport

N=: 495 respondents

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell 2000;Fidell, Silvati, Pearsons, Howe, and

Sneddon 2000

Notes: Interviews were conducted by telephone.

USA-430 1994-95 Denver Airport Opening Sleep

Disturbance Study

Date: 1994 (February - May), 1995 (February - April)

Source: Aircraft on test nights.

Location: U.S.A.: Denver (2 neighborhoods near Stapleton

International Airport and one near the new Denver

international airport)

N=: 2,717 nights of information about sleep from 77

subjects in 37 households

Noise data: Yes: inside and outside

Reference: Fidell, Howe, Tabachnick, Pearsons, and Sneddon

1995;Fidell, Tabachnick, Pearsons, and Howe

2000;Pearsons, Tabachnick, and Fidell 2000

Notes: Test participants answered morning and evening

questionnaires on a palm top computer that also

registered reported behavioral awakenings during

the night. Actimeters were also used. There was

not a marked change in noise-induced sleep
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-73-

disturbance at either airport although aircraft

noise decreased greatly at subjects' residences at

one airport and increased slightly at the other

airport.

USA-431 1995 Seattle-Tacoma Airport Noise Survey

Date: 1995 ( February 16 - 19)

Source: Aircraft (following a period when noise levels

gradually reduced)

Location: U.S.A.: Seattle-Tacoma International Airport (6

areas)

N=: 1,444 (1,236 from respondents with noise data

from five communities)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell, Silvati, and Pearsons 1995;Fidell, Silvati,

and Pearsons 1996

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted. Despite an

approximate 1.5 dB(A) DNL decrease in aircraft

noise exposure more residents believed there had

been an increase than a decrease in aircraft noise.

USA-432 1997 LAX Low-Frequency Noise Survey

Date: 1997 (August)

Source: Aircraft (LAX)

Location: U.S.A.: El Segundo, California (1000 to 5000 feet

south of LAX runway)

N=: 644 respondents from among the 1,262 household

with listed telephone numbers in the area

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Fidell 2000;Fidell, Silvati, Pearsons, Howe, and

Sneddon 2000;Fidell, Silvati, Pearsons, Lind, and

Howe 1999

Notes: Telephone interviews were conducted. A dose

response relationship for the relationship between

annoyance and low frequency noise is presented.

USA-433 1993 LAX/Castle AFB Behavioral Awakening

Study

Date: 1993 (May to October)

Source: Aircraft on test nights.

Location: U.S.A.: Castle Air Force Base (Merced, California)

and Los Angeles International Airport and other

sites "Lacking appreciable nighttime aircraft noise"

N=: 1,823 nights of information from 86 subjects (82

were analyzed) in 45 households

Noise data: Yes: inside and outside

Reference: Fidell, Pearsons, Howe, Tabachnick, Silvati, and

Barber 1994;Fidell, Pearsons, Tabachnick, Howe,

Silvati, and Barber 1995;Pearsons, Tabachnick,

and Fidell 2000

Notes: This study measured sleep disturbance with nine

variables. Seven were obtained from a morningafter questionnaire and two from pushing a button

when there was a behavioral awakening. Sleep

disturbance was related to the noise level of the

individual events measured within the homes.

USA-435 1996 Olympic Games Aircraft Noise Sleep Study

Date: 1996 (July 2 to August 11)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.A.: Atlanta (a neighborhood near Georgia

DeKalb-Peachtree Airport that experienced an

increase in aircraft traffic during the 1996 Olympic

games)

N=: 686 nights of sleep information from 25 people in

12 dwellings

Noise data: Yes: Noise data were available for inside the

sleeping room and outside the house.

Reference: Fidell, Howe, Tabachnick, Pearsons, Silvati,

Sneddon, and Fletcher 1998

Notes: Respondents answered self-administered

questionnaires about each night in the evening and

morning. They wore a wrist movement detection

device (motility measurement) and were instructed

to press a button each time they woke up. 

Behavioral awakening and arousal were found to

be related to aircraft noise level, but motility was

not related to noise level.

USA-490 1993-94 USA Individual Sound Noticeability Study

Date: 1993 (May to October for CAFB & LAX), 1994

(Summer for APG)

Source: Aircraft

Location: USA: Castle Air Force Base (CAFB), California;

Los Angeles Airport (LAX); and Aberdeen

Proving Ground (APG), Maryland.

N=: 25 (There were 11 subjects at CAFB and 8 at LAX,

where 9 and 5, respectively, were useful. 11

subjects at APG were analyzed.)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Schomer 1996;Schomer and Wagner 1996

Notes: The noticeability of sounds was studied by asking

subjects to record their response to individual

aircraft events on a hand-held computer as they

went about their activities at home. The subjects at

CAFB and LAX were all of the participants in a

nighttime study (USA-433) who were home 

during the day and willing to cooperate in this

study as well.

USA-513 1985 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Boston)

Date: 1985

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Boston

N=: 53

Noise data: No

Reference: Florentine, Namba, and Kuwano 1986

Notes: University students answered this written
SURVEY DESCRIPTION (Continued)

-74-

questionnaire's general statements about

neighbors' noise without direct reference to

their present residence. There are some

differences between perceptions and attitudes

toward neighbors' noise in England, Germany

and Japan. The questionnaire is nearly identical

to questionnaires administered in Japan (JPN510), England (UKD-512), Germany (GER511), and China (CHI-514).

USA-518 1995 Japanese/English Questionnaire Testing

Study (Boston)

Date: 1995

Source: Community

Location: U.S.A.: Boston

N=: 100

Noise data: No

Reference: Kuwano, Namba, and Florentine 1996

Notes: This questionnaire was developed for broad use by

the Acoustical society of Japan and administered

on a test basis in this study and one study in Japan

(JPN-517).

USR-042 USSR 22-Settlement Aircraft Noise Survey

Date: 1969 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Aircraft

Location: U.S.S.R.: 22 settlements around 9 airports

N=: Over 2,000

Noise data: No (Noise data are not analyzed with responses.)

Reference: Karagodina, Soldatkina, Vinokur, and Klimukhin

1969

Notes: Disturbance with aircraft noise is related to

distance from airports.

YUG-141 Two-Area Belgrade Aircraft Noise Study

Date: 1976 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Yugoslavia: Two settlements near Belgrade airport

N=: (Not known)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Pravica 1976

Notes: The method of administering the questionnaire to

residents is not known. An abbreviated version of

the Cornell Medical Index showed more neurosis

near the airport.

YUG-234 1981 Split, Yugoslavia Airport Survey

Date: 1981 (April)

Source: Aircraft

Location: Yugoslavia: Split Airport

N=: 252

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Institut Saobracajnog Fakulteta 1981;Zoric, Lukic,

and Gvozdenovic 1982;Zoric and Miroslav 1981

Notes: None

YUG-352 Pancevo Noise and Air Pollution Health Survey

Date: 1993 Publication (Survey date not reported)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Yugoslavia: Pancevo

N=: 224 (165 from center, 59 from industrial zone)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Pjerotic and Nikolic 1993

Notes: Road traffic was reported to be the predominant

source of nervousness by respondents.

YUG-434 1994 Central Belgrade Traffic Noise Survey

Date: 1994 (October, November)

Source: Road traffic

Location: Yugoslavia: Belgrade (a noise central area)

N=: 409 (252 in noisy area, 157 in control area)

Noise data: Yes

Reference: Belojevic and Jakovljevic 1998;Belojevic,

Jakovljevic, and Aleksic 1997;Belojevic,

Jakovljevic, and Santric-Milicevic 1997

Notes: Reports of general sleep quality and specific sleep

disturbances were greater in the noisy (>65 dB(A)

LAeq) than the quiet area (<55 dB(A)LAeq.

Behavioral reactions to traffic noise were affected

by personality traits of subjective noise sensitivity

and neuroticism.
-75-

NOISE SOURCE INDEX

In this index each survey is listed under each of the primary noise sources studied in the survey. 

The noise source classification is based on the extent of information available about both the noise

reactions and the noise environment for the particular source. As a result, a survey is listed under

only a single noise heading when the standard survey approach is followed of focusing many

questions on only a single noise source while including a single short question about each other

possible noise source. If several noise sources are studied in detail, there are multiple entries for

the survey in this index.

The index is ordered alphabetically by noise source and, within noise source, by country and

survey identification number. The ten noise sources are Aircraft, Community, Construction,

Impulse, Industry, Interior (primarily noise from attached dwelling units), Railway (including all

tracked transit systems), Road Traffic, Sonic Boom, and Miscellaneous. The survey identification

number precedes each survey's title.

AIRCRAFT

AUL-036 1969 Sydney Airport Noise Survey

AUL-210 1980 Australian Five-Airport Survey

AUL-211 1979 Sydney Airport Study of Type of Noise

Reactions

AUL-244 1979 Sydney Airport Pilot Survey

AUL-307 1986 Sydney Aircraft/Road Traffic Survey

AUL-383 1994-95 Sydney Airport Noise Change Survey

AUL-384 1992 Sydney Aircraft Noise Amelioration

Attitudes Survey

AUL-456 1995 Sydney Airport Ku-ring-gai Noise Survey

BEL-151 1977-78 Belgium Four-Airport Noise Survey

BEL-288 1980s Brussels International Airport Noise

Survey

CAN-055 1971 Dorval Aircraft Noise Survey

CAN-078 1972 Calgary Noise Survey

CAN-168 1978 Canadian Four-Airport Survey

CAN-174 1978 Canadian National Community Noise

Survey

CAN-181 1979 Canadian Three Airport General Aviation

Study

CAN-236 1981 Southern Ontario Community Survey

CAN-385 1990s Vancouver Airport Noise Change Survey

DEN-380 1983 Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Survey

DEN-381 1986 Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Followup

Survey

DEN-519 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study

(Denmark)

FRA-016 1965 French Four-Airport Noise Study

FRA-017 1965 French Regional Sonic Boom Survey

FRA-045 1970 French Sonic Boom Survey

FRA-056 1971 Orly Aircraft Noise Survey

FRA-087 1973 St Cyr L'Ecole General Aviation Noise

Survey

FRA-098 1974-75 Roissy Airport Before/After Opening

Noise Survey

FRA-099 1974 French National Aircraft Noise Survey

FRA-113 1975 Orly Airport Noise Study

FRA-131 1976 Orly Medical Effects Pilot Study

FRA-146 1977 French Light Aircraft Study

FRA-150 1977 Roissy Airport Survey

FRA-189 1971 French Concorde Sonic Boom Study

FRA-218 1975 Strasbourg Airport Noise Survey

FRA-239 1984-1986 French Combined Aircraft/Road

Traffic Survey

FRA-391 1998-99 Orly Airport Contingent Valuation

Noise Survey

FRA-395 1998 Orly/Roissy Airport Noise Survey

GER-034 1969 Munich Airport Noise (DFG Aircraft

Noise Study)

GER-037 1969 Meppen Sonic Boom Field Experiment

GER-114 1975 German General Aviation Survey

GER-134 1976 Hamburg Urban Noise Survey

GER-372 1985-86 Ratingen Düsseldorf Road

Traffic/Aircraft Survey

GER-373 1987 Düsseldorf/Ratingen Aircraft/ Road

Traffic Survey

GER-374 1993 Greifswald Traffic Noise Survey

GER-464 Oldenburg Noise Situation Investigation

GER-466 1998 Düsseldorf/Dortmund Airport Noise
NOISE SOURCE INDEX (Continued)

-76-

Information Survey

GER-472 1994 1996 Düsseldorf Activity Disturbance

Study

GER-473 1995 Düsseldorf Airport Noise Survey

HKG-125 1975 Hong Kong Fireman Environmental

Noise Survey

HKG-208 Preliminary Hong Kong Fireman Noise Survey

JPN-018 1965 Osaka Aircraft Noise Survey

JPN-046 1970 Yokota Air Base Study

JPN-062 1972 Akishima City Aircraft Noise Survey

JPN-152 1977 Atugi Military Aircraft Noise Study

JPN-163 1972 Itami City Osaka Airport Noise Study

JPN-293 Osaka Aircraft and Environmental Noise

Survey

JPN-353 1992 Chatan Town Kadena Air Base Survey

JPN-444 1996-97 Kadena/Futenma Military Aircraft

Noise Survey

JPN-445 1995-96 Kadena General Health Questionnaire

Survey

JPN-446 1994 Sapporo Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-491 1996 Osaka International Airport Noise Survey

JPN-500 1999 Osaka Aircraft Noise and Health Survey

JPN-509 1972-81 Kyushu Airport Opening Survey

KOR-475 1980s Seoul Multiple-Source Noise Survey

NET-013 1963 Schiphol Airport Survey

NET-115 1975 Schiphol/Marssum Aircraft Noise

Insulation Survey

NET-149 1977 Schiphol/Marssum Sound Insulation

Survey

NET-193 1976 Netherlands Military Airfields Noise

Study

NET-196 1978 Dutch Homes for the Aged

Environmental Noise Study

NET-240 1984 Schiphol Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

NET-269 1986 Netherlands Low-Level Military Aircraft

Study

NET-371 1996-97 Schiphol Airport GES Survey

NET-379 1998 Groningen Eelde Airport Survey

NET-468 1998 Schiphol Sleep Disturbance Pilot Survey

NOR-311 1989 Oslo Airport Survey

NOR-328 1992-93 Bodö Aircraft Military Exercise

Survey

NOR-366 1990-91 Værnes Aircraft Military Exercise

Survey

NOR-397 1999 Oslo Contingent Valuation Noise Survey

NOR-520 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study

(Norway)

POL-198 1974 Warsaw Aircraft Noise Survey

SAF-028 1968 South Africa Preliminary Aircraft Noise

Survey

SPA-348 1989-90 Spanish Airport Survey

SPA-411 1998 Altet-Alicante Airport Noise Survey

SWE-011 1963 Linköping Airport Noise Study

SWE-035 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study

(Sweden)

SWE-054 1971 Trängslet Sonic Boom Study

SWE-108 1972 Burgsvik Sonic Boom Study

SWE-222 Nausta Research Camp Sonic Boom Study

SWE-419 1988-93 Swedish Small Airport Noise Survey

SWI-053 1971 Swiss Three-City Noise Survey

SWI-180 1979 Swiss General Aviation Survey

TRK-283 1980-84 Istanbul Noise Survey

UKD-008 1961 Heathrow Aircraft Noise Survey (First

Heathrow Survey)

UKD-024 1967 Heathrow Aircraft Noise Study (Second

Heathrow Survey)

UKD-033 1969 Mixed Road/Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-052 1971 Gatwick Airport Noise Survey

UKD-061 1972 Heathrow Airport Noise Pilot Survey

UKD-086 1973 Kew Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-097 1974 English Aircraft Noise Postal Survey

UKD-111 1975-76 English Mental Health Pilot Survey

UKD-112 1975 Luton In-migrants Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-130 1976 Heathrow Concorde Noise Survey

UKD-147 1977 Heathrow Nighttime Pilot Survey

UKD-148 1977 West London (Heathrow) Psychiatric

Morbidity Survey

UKD-182 1979 Heathrow/Gatwick Sleep Study

UKD-224 1982 Manchester Night Noise Survey

UKD-225 1982 British Helicopter Disturbance Study

UKD-238 1984 Glasgow Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

UKD-241 1982 Heathrow Combined Aircraft/Road

Traffic Survey

UKD-242 1982 United Kingdom Aircraft Noise Index

Study

UKD-243 1981 United Kingdom General Aviation

Airport Survey

UKD-305 1980-83 Noise Sensitivity Follow-up Survey

UKD-309 1977 Hamble Airfield Survey

UKD-324 1986 English General Aviation Survey

UKD-339 1991 United Kingdom Four-Airport Sleep

Survey

UKD-347 1990 Manchester Airport Sleep Survey

UKD-427 1996-97 Heathrow Area Children Noise Survey

UKD-482 1999-2000 UK 5-Airport Night Noise

Perception Survey

UKD-483 1999 Manchester Nighttime Aircraft Noise

Trial Methodology Study

UKD-489 1999-2000 UK 4-Airport Night Noise Mail

Survey

USA-004 1953 USA Eight-Airport Noise Survey

USA-006 1957 USA Air Force Base Noise Survey

USA-007 1961 St Louis Sonic Boom Study

USA-012 1964 Oklahoma City Sonic Boom Study

USA-022 1967 USA Four-Airport Survey (Phase I Tracor

Survey)
NOISE SOURCE INDEX (Continued)

-77-

USA-023 1967-68 SR-71 Supersonic Aircraft Noise

Study

USA-027 1968 LAX Aircraft Noise Study

USA-031 1969 LAX Aircraft Noise Study

USA-032 1969 USA Three-Airport Survey (Phase II

Tracor Survey)

USA-044 1970 USA Small City Airports (Small City

Tracor survey)

USA-048 1970 C.R.P. Inglewood Community Noise

Survey

USA-051 1971 J.F.K. Dynamic Preferential Runway

System Survey

USA-059 1972 J.F.K. Airport Noise Survey

USA-060 1972 Portland Northshore Aircraft Survey

USA-082 1973 Los Angeles Airport Night Study

USA-083 1973 LAX Airport Noise Study

USA-084 1973 J.F.K. Airport Noise Study

USA-085 1973 Seattle-Tacoma Airport Noise Study

USA-090 1973 E.P.A. Community Noise Questionnaire

Pilot Study

USA-091 1973 Test of Real-Time Personal Annoyance

Monitoring Devices

USA-095 U.S. Census Bureau Annual Housing Surveys

USA-096 1974 Fort Campbell Area Helicopter Noise

Survey

USA-110 1975 J.F.K. Airport Noise Survey

USA-127 1976-77 Dulles Concorde Noise Study

USA-128 1976 Orange County Airport Noise Survey

USA-129 Albany/Louisville Aircraft Fear Study

USA-143 1977-78 Three-Phase J.F.K. Concorde Noise

Study

USA-144 1977-78 F.A.A. J.F.K. Concorde Noise Study

USA-145 1977 Orange County Airport Noise Study

USA-166 1978 Salt Lake Airport Noise Study

USA-167 1978-79 USA Helicopter Survey of Selected

Occupations

USA-170 1978 U.S. Army Impulse Noise Survey

USA-179 1979 Oklahoma City Airport Noise Survey

USA-186 1980 Bradley International Airport Noise

Survey

USA-191 1979 Philadelphia Aircraft Noise Survey

USA-202 1978-79 Time-of-Day Study with Annoyance

Recording Device

USA-203 1979 Burbank Aircraft Noise Change Study

USA-204 1981 John Wayne Airport Operation Change

Study

USA-205 1980 Bellevue Airport Noise Study

USA-207 1980 John Wayne Airport (Orange County)

Survey

USA-212 1972 Minneapolis St Paul Airport Development

Survey

USA-215 1974 Los Angeles International Aircraft Noise

Survey

USA-217 1980 Aircraft Rating Diary (Pilot) Study

USA-219 1980 Salt Lake City In-Home Aircraft Rating

Study

USA-235 1983 Controlled Exposure Helicopter Noise

Study

USA-245 1970s LAX Six-Community Noise Survey

USA-250 1982 Decatur General Aviation Airport Survey

USA-251 Two-Neighborhood San Francisco Airport

Survey

USA-299 1966 Edwards Air Force Base Resident Sonic

Boom Survey

USA-301 1982 Westchester Airport Nighttime Noise

Change Study

USA-310 1972 Los Angeles Airport Relocated Residents

Survey

USA-338 1981 USA Air Force Base Study

USA-349 Atlanta Airport Acoustical Insulation Survey

USA-375 1993-95 Western USA Sonic Boom Study

USA-428 1996 Minneapolis-St Paul Aircraft Mitigation

Preference Survey

USA-429 1999 Minneapolis-St Paul Airport Noise

Survey

USA-430 1994-95 Denver Airport Opening Sleep

Disturbance Study

USA-431 1995 Seattle-Tacoma Airport Noise Survey

USA-432 1997 LAX Low-Frequency Noise Survey

USA-433 1993 LAX/Castle AFB Behavioral Awakening

Study

USA-435 1996 Olympic Games Aircraft Noise Sleep

Study

USA-490 1993-94 USA Individual Sound Noticeability

Study

USR-042 USSR 22-Settlement Aircraft Noise Survey

YUG-141 Two-Area Belgrade Aircraft Noise Study

YUG-234 1981 Split, Yugoslavia Airport Survey

COMMUNITY

AUL-214 1978 Leichhardt Municipality Complaint

Comparison Survey

AUL-285 1986 Australian National Noise Survey

AUL-286 1986 Brisbane Noise Survey

AUL-287 1986 Toowoomba Community Noise Survey

CAN-076 1972 London/Woodstock Community Noise

Survey

CAN-077 1972 Edmonton Community Noise Survey

CAN-078 1972 Calgary Noise Survey

CAN-079 1972 Toronto Community Noise Survey

CAN-121 1975-76 Southern Ontario Community Survey

CAN-174 1978 Canadian National Community Noise

Survey

CHI-457 1986 Beijing City (Nagoya Comparison)

Survey

CHI-514 1985 Student Noise Attitudes Study

(Beijing/Tsinghua)

CZE-402 1995-97 Czech Noise/Public Health Survey
NOISE SOURCE INDEX (Continued)

-78-

FRA-289 1986-87 French National Transportation Noise

Survey

FRA-323 1976 Nationwide Noise Survey of France

FRA-342 1992 French Home Insulation Survey

FRA-392 1998 Paris "Zone 30" Noise Survey

GER-275 1986-87 Darmstadt Movers Survey

GER-511 1980 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Germany)

GER-516 1983 Apartment Noise Attitudes Study

(Germany)

GRE-331 1992 Rhodes Residential Noise Survey

JPN-138 1976 Kanagawa Ward Community Noise

Survey

JPN-177 1978 Kanagawa Ward Community Noise

Survey

JPN-293 Osaka Aircraft and Environmental Noise

Survey

JPN-294 Nagoya City 1980s Cumulative Noise Survey

JPN-358 Central Tokyo Combined Residential and

Personal Noise Survey

JPN-438 1991 Fukuoka Green Areas Noise Survey

JPN-442 1987 Fukuoka 19-Area Community Noise

Survey

JPN-492 1991 Yokohama Sound Environment Survey

JPN-494 1987 Odawara Sound Environment Survey

JPN-495 1984 Nagoya Neighborhood Noise Survey

JPN-498 1988-91 Setagaya Tokyo Environmental

Complaints Survey

JPN-506 1980s Yomahoko Community Noise Survey

JPN-507 1996 Nishijin Textile Neighborhood Noise

Survey

JPN-510 1980s Student Noise Attitudes Study (Japan)

JPN-515 1983 Apartment Noise Attitudes Study (Japan)

JPN-517 1990, 1995 Japanese/English Questionnaire

Testing Study (Osaka)

NET-261 1977 Netherlands National Noise Survey

NET-356 1987 Netherlands National Noise Survey

NET-361 1993 Netherlands National Environmental

Survey

NIG-485 Nigeria Eight-City Noise Survey

NOR-405 1997 Norwegian Survey of Living Conditions

OMA-476 1996-98 Oman Sound Environment Survey

PUR-188 San Juan Community Noise Survey

SPA-302 1986 Valencia Five-Site Survey

SPA-320 Zaragoza City Noise Survey

SPA-409 Pozuelo de Alarcón Two-Area Acoustical

Environment Survey

SPA-410 1999 Pamplona Contingent Valuation Noise

Survey

SWI-304 1986 Swiss Multi-Story Building Sound

Insulation Study

THA-455 1990-91 Bangkok Personal Noise Exposure

Survey

UKD-001 1943 British Home Noise Survey

UKD-132 1976 Darlington Quiet Town Survey

UKD-160 1977 Hampshire Village Noise Study

UKD-199 1978 Darlington Quiet Town Survey

UKD-296 1985 Great Britain Neighborhood Noise Survey

UKD-423 1991 England/Wales Environmental Noise

Survey

UKD-424 1999 Bristol Community Noise Survey

UKD-512 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Britain)

USA-020 1966 USA Three-City Community Noise Study

USA-039 1969-70 San Francisco Three-Street Pilot Study

USA-040 1969 Inglewood Community Noise Survey

USA-048 1970 C.R.P. Inglewood Community Noise

Survey

USA-058 Philadelphia Community Noise Survey

USA-067 1972 Boulder Community Noise Survey

USA-068 1972 College Park Community Noise Survey

USA-081 Boulder Newspaper Community Noise Survey

USA-089 1973 Portland-Multnomah Community Noise

Survey

USA-090 1973 E.P.A. Community Noise Questionnaire

Pilot Study

USA-091 1973 Test of Real-Time Personal Annoyance

Monitoring Devices

USA-095 U.S. Census Bureau Annual Housing Surveys

USA-102 1974 USA 24-Site Community Noise Survey

USA-117 1975 Boulder Noise Survey

USA-171 1978 Spokane Community Noise Survey

USA-172 1978 Kentucky Urban Noise Survey

USA-183 1979 Salt Lake City Community Noise Survey

USA-191 1979 Philadelphia Aircraft Noise Survey

USA-221 1977 Allentown Community Noise Survey

USA-308 1979 Salt Lake City Stationary Noise Source

Survey

USA-513 1985 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Boston)

USA-518 1995 Japanese/English Questionnaire Testing

Study (Boston)

CONSTRUCTION

GER-134 1976 Hamburg Urban Noise Survey

JPN-271 Japan Three-Site Construction Noise Survey

UKD-074 1972 London Construction Site Survey

USA-213 1973 Chicago Construction Site Survey

IMPULSE

AUL-209 1979 Hornsby Rifle Range Survey

AUL-321 1983 Sydney Artillery Range Survey

CAN-136 1976 Canada Impulse Noise Survey

FRA-252 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(France)

GER-253 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Germany)

GER-278 1980 German Shooting Range Survey

GER-290 1981 German Military Training Area Survey

GER-454 1991 German Artillery and Road Traffic Noise

Survey
NOISE SOURCE INDEX (Continued)

-79-

IRE-254 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Ireland)

JPN-140 1977 Camp Fuji Noise Survey

NET-255 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Netherlands)

NET-260 1980-81 Netherlands Pile Driver Impulse Noise

Survey

NET-354 1990 Marnewaard Shooting Range Residential

Survey

NET-460 1993 Dutch Artillery Range Noise Annoyance

and Startle Survey

NOR-397 1999 Oslo Contingent Valuation Noise Survey

SWE-015 1964-70 Karlstad Artillery Range Noise Study

SWE-185 1975 Gothenburg Rifle Range Survey

SWE-360 Swedish Four-Site Shooting Range Noise

Annoyance Survey

SWE-437 Swedish Eight-Range Heavy Weapons Noise

Survey

UKD-010 1963 Welsh Village Impulse Noise (Exercise

Yellow Hammer)

USA-170 1978 U.S. Army Impulse Noise Survey

USA-206 1981 Alabama Three-Site Blast Noise Survey

INDUSTRY

CAN-136 1976 Canada Impulse Noise Survey

CAN-169 1978-79 Canadian Five Railway Yard Survey

GER-134 1976 Hamburg Urban Noise Survey

GER-231 1981 Blast Furnace and Road Noise Study

JPN-005 1953 Osaka/Amagasaki Industrial Noise

Survey

JPN-497 1992 Itabashi Tokyo Environmental

Complaints Survey

NET-196 1978 Dutch Homes for the Aged

Environmental Noise Study

NET-232 1980 Netherlands Industrial Noise Survey

NET-257 1979 Netherlands Industrial Noise Pilot Survey

NET-259 1977 Netherlands Industrial Noise Pilot Survey

NET-260 1980-81 Netherlands Pile Driver Impulse Noise

Survey

USA-049 1970 Cedar Rock Drive Neighborhood Noise

Investigation

INTERIOR

CAN-262 Canadian Party Wall Insulation Pilot Survey

FRA-342 1992 French Home Insulation Survey

JPN-376 1971-77 Chiba Multi-Family Dwelling Survey

JPN-377 1992-95 Tokyo Multi-Family Dwelling Study

NET-002 1950 Netherlands Sound Insulation Effects

Study

NET-263 1982-1983 Netherlands New Dwelling Survey

NET-462 1997 Netherlands Home Insulation Survey

POL-477 1997 Warsaw Low-Frequency Interior Noise

Study

SWI-304 1986 Swiss Multi-Story Building Sound

Insulation Study

UKD-001 1943 British Home Noise Survey

UKD-003 1952 Sound Insulation in Flats Survey

UKD-119 1975 Great Britain Interior Noise Survey

UKD-220 1978 British Interior Noise Survey

UKD-233 1980 British Flats' Sound Insulation Survey

UKD-422 1997 English Residential Soundproofing

Survey

UKD-436 London/Birmingham Converted Flats Survey

UKD-484 1992-94 Great Britain Insulation Complaint

Survey

USA-300 1975 Rutgers Freshmen Dormitory Noise

Sensitivity Study

MISCELLANEOUS

AUL-247 Victoria Australia Entertainment Center Study

AUL-248 1983 Melbourne Australia Simon and

Garfunkel Concerts

AUL-249 1983 Melbourne Australia David Bowie

Concert

AUL-306 1988 New South Wales Power Station Survey

CAN-322 1990 Toronto Air Conditioner Survey

DEN-333 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study

(Denmark)

GER-290 1981 German Military Training Area Survey

GER-335 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study

(Germany)

JPN-439 1992 Fukuoka Green Areas Survey

JPN-443 1993 Fukuoka 12-Area Community Noise

Survey

JPN-501 1985 Kawasaki Life-Related Noise Survey

JPN-505 1993 Osaka Free-Response Industrial Noise

Survey

JPN-508 Toyonaka City Free-Response Noise Survey

NET-334 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study

(Netherlands)

SWE-337 Swedish Low Frequency Heat Pump Noise

Study

UKD-161 1977 Southampton Hovercraft Noise Survey

UKD-175 1978 Southampton Hovercraft Terminal Noise

Survey

USA-216 1978 Electrical Power Line and Transformer

Noise Survey

RAILWAY

AUS-487 1998 Inn Valley Road/Railway Noise Survey

AUS-488 1998 Tyrol Children/Mothers Noise Survey

AUS-521 Austrian Transportation Noise and Blood

Pressure Survey

CAN-078 1972 Calgary Noise Survey

CAN-126 Toronto Railway Noise Survey

CAN-169 1978-79 Canadian Five Railway Yard Survey

CAN-174 1978 Canadian National Community Noise

Survey

CAN-236 1981 Southern Ontario Community Survey

DEN-200 1979 Danish Railway Noise Survey

EGY-357 Alexandria Tram Noise Study

FRA-063 1972 Paris Area Railway Noise Survey
NOISE SOURCE INDEX (Continued)

-80-

FRA-336 1991 TGV High Speed Train Pilot Survey

FRA-393 1997 France Road/Railway Noise Survey

FRA-396 1993 TGV High Speed Train Survey

GER-134 1976 Hamburg Urban Noise Survey

GER-135 1976 Stuttgart Railway/Road Noise Survey

GER-192 1977-83 German Road/Railway Noise

Comparison Study

GER-464 Oldenburg Noise Situation Investigation

GER-465 1996-97 German Sleep Disturbance Survey

GER-467 1997 ICE High-Speed Railway Noise Survey

GER-470 1996-97 German Road/Rail Traffic Noise

Survey

GER-471 1995-96 Germany Rail-Grinding Noise

Reduction Study (Pilot)

GER-479 1997-98 Germany Rail-Grinding Noise

Reduction Study (Primary)

GER-480 1996-97 German Road/Rail Sleep Study

JPN-064 1972 Environmental Agency of Japan

Shinkansen Noise Survey

JPN-065 1972 New Tokaido and New Sanyo Shinkansen

Railway Noise

JPN-101 1974 Sendai City Regular Railway Noise

Survey

JPN-123 1975 Yokohama Road/Railway Noise Survey

JPN-139 1976 Japanese Road/Railway Noise Study

JPN-201 1975 Shinkansen Railway Survey

JPN-319 1989 Muroran Road/Railway Noise Survey

JPN-340 1983 Tokyo Railway Noise Survey

JPN-370 1994-95 Kyushu Railway Survey

JPN-441 1987 Fukuoka Railway Crossing Noise Survey

JPN-448 1987 Sapporo Railway Noise and Vibration

Survey

JPN-449 1991 Sapporo Railway Noise and Vibration

Survey

JPN-493 1985-86 Shinkansen/Conventional Rail Noise

Survey

KOR-475 1980s Seoul Multiple-Source Noise Survey

NET-153 1977 Netherlands Railway Noise Survey

NET-194 1976 Netherlands Railway Noise Survey

NET-195 1977-78 Netherlands New Railway Line Survey

NET-196 1978 Dutch Homes for the Aged

Environmental Noise Study

NET-276 1983 Netherlands Tram/Road Traffic Noise

Survey

NET-378 1998 Rotterdam-Ruhrgebiet Freight Railway

Pilot Study

POL-184 Polish Railway Noise Survey

SPA-408 1994-95 Spanish Underground Railway Noise

Survey

SWE-165 1976 Gothenburg Tramway Noise Survey

SWE-228 1978-80 Swedish Railway Study

SWE-365 1989-93 Swedish Railway Survey

SWE-412 1997 Sollentuna Road/Rail Noise Survey

SWE-413 1996 Kungsbacka Railway Noise

Countermeasures Study

SWE-414 1995-96 Lund Railway Noise Barrier Survey

TRK-283 1980-84 Istanbul Noise Survey

UKD-029 1968 Coventry Pilot Railway Noise Survey

UKD-038 1969 Central England Railway Survey

UKD-116 1975 British National Railway Noise Survey

UKD-355 1990 East London Docklands Light Rail Survey

USA-066 1972 BART Residential Impact Survey

ROAD TRAFFIC

AUL-226 1974 Brisbane S-E Freeway Study

AUL-227 1975-76 Australian Three-City Roadway Study

AUL-264 1980 Brisbane Traffic Noise Reduction Survey

AUL-265 1980 Brisbane Traffic Noise Increase Survey

AUL-285 1986 Australian National Noise Survey

AUL-307 1986 Sydney Aircraft/Road Traffic Survey

AUL-332 1991 Brisbane Traffic Noise Survey

AUL-461 1995-96 Four-Phase Sydney Road Traffic Noise

Survey

AUS-014 1964 Vienna Road Traffic Noise Survey

AUS-093 1973 Vienna Road Traffic Noise Survey

AUS-178 1977 Austrian Road Traffic Survey

AUS-329 1989 Austrian Alps Road Traffic Noise Survey

AUS-487 1998 Inn Valley Road/Railway Noise Survey

AUS-488 1998 Tyrol Children/Mothers Noise Survey

AUS-521 Austrian Transportation Noise and Blood

Pressure Survey

BEL-107 Preliminary Leuven Traffic Noise Survey

BEL-122 1975 Antwerp Traffic Noise Survey

BEL-137 1976 Brussels Traffic Noise Survey

BRA-474 1994 Porto Alegre Noise Survey

CAN-120 1975 Western Ontario University Traffic Noise

Survey

CAN-121 1975-76 Southern Ontario Community Survey

CAN-236 1981 Southern Ontario Community Survey

CAN-279 1976 Toronto Freeway 401 Privacy Fence

Survey

CAN-280 1978 Etobicoke/Ottawa Noise Barrier Study

CHI-230 1975 Beijing Traffic Noise Survey

CHI-386 1986-1989 Chinese Five-City Road Traffic

Noise Survey

CHI-457 1986 Beijing City (Nagoya Comparison)

Survey

CZE-109 Bratislava Traffic Noise Survey

DEN-075 1972 Copenhagen Traffic Noise Survey

DEN-387 1999-2000 Øster Søgade Copenhagen Porous

Asphalt Survey

DEN-388 1998 Danish Speed Bump Noise Survey

DEN-389 1998 Danish Road Traffic Noise Barrier Study

DEN-390 1999 Aarhus Road Traffic Noise Survey

FRA-019 1965 Paris Expressway Noise Survey

FRA-041 1969 Paris Road Traffic Noise Study

FRA-092 1973 French Ten-City Traffic Noise Survey

FRA-124 1975-76 l'Hay les Roses Barrier Survey

FRA-197 1979 French Behavioral Effects of Road Noise
NOISE SOURCE INDEX (Continued)

-81-

Study

FRA-239 1984-1986 French Combined Aircraft/Road

Traffic Survey

FRA-252 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(France)

FRA-289 1986-87 French National Transportation Noise

Survey

FRA-346 1991 French Before/After Noise Abatement

Survey

FRA-364 1993-94 French 18-Site Time-Of-Day Study

FRA-393 1997 France Road/Railway Noise Survey

FRA-394 1997 Besançon Road Traffic Noise Survey

GER-134 1976 Hamburg Urban Noise Survey

GER-135 1976 Stuttgart Railway/Road Noise Survey

GER-164 1973 Düsseldorf Traffic Noise Survey

GER-192 1977-83 German Road/Railway Noise

Comparison Study

GER-231 1981 Blast Furnace and Road Noise Study

GER-246 1977-78 German Six-City Traffic Change

Panel Study

GER-253 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Germany)

GER-256 Berlin Nighttime Noise Survey

GER-278 1980 German Shooting Range Survey

GER-281 1976-77 German Highway Noise Study

GER-282 1979 Wuppertal/Düsseldorf Traffic Noise

Barriers Study

GER-291 1984 Visual Context of Noise Survey

(Germany)

GER-363 1988 German Noise Barrier Evaluation Survey

GER-372 1985-86 Ratingen Düsseldorf Road

Traffic/Aircraft Survey

GER-373 1987 Düsseldorf/Ratingen Aircraft/ Road

Traffic Survey

GER-374 1993 Greifswald Traffic Noise Survey

GER-454 1991 German Artillery and Road Traffic Noise

Survey

GER-463 1993-94 Berlin Women Environmental Health

Survey

GER-464 Oldenburg Noise Situation Investigation

GER-465 1996-97 German Sleep Disturbance Survey

GER-470 1996-97 German Road/Rail Traffic Noise

Survey

GER-472 1994 1996 Düsseldorf Activity Disturbance

Study

GER-480 1996-97 German Road/Rail Sleep Study

GER-502 German Noise Change Part of CEC Sleep

Study

HKG-125 1975 Hong Kong Fireman Environmental

Noise Survey

HKG-187 Hong Kong Socio-Economic Area Road Traffic

Survey

HKG-208 Preliminary Hong Kong Fireman Noise Survey

HUN-458 1995 Hungary Road Traffic Noise Survey

IRE-254 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Ireland)

IRN-459 1977 Tehran Community Noise Survey

IRQ-229 1980 Baghdad Street Noise Survey

ITL-318 1967 Ferrara Comparative Traffic Noise Study

ITL-350 1990 Modena Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-094 1973-74 Sendai Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-123 1975 Yokohama Road/Railway Noise Survey

JPN-139 1976 Japanese Road/Railway Noise Study

JPN-140 1977 Camp Fuji Noise Survey

JPN-190 1956 Kyoto Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-292 1984 Sapporo City Traffic Noise and Vibration

Survey

JPN-294 Nagoya City 1980s Cumulative Noise Survey

JPN-319 1989 Muroran Road/Railway Noise Survey

JPN-326 1991 Muroran Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-341 1989 Sapporo Traffic Noise/Vibration Survey

JPN-343 1990-93 Tokyo Five-Area Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-369 1996 Kumamoto Road Traffic Survey

JPN-382 1997-98 Sapporo Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-440 1984 Fukuoka Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-447 1990 Sapporo Traffic Noise and Vibration

Survey

JPN-450 1995-96 Kyushu Expressway Survey

JPN-451 1993 Kumamoto Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-452 1993 Tomakomai Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-453 1988-1990 Hokkaido/Kyushu Traffic Noise

Survey

JPN-496 1994-96 Tokyo Trunk Road Noise Survey

JPN-499 Tokyo Four-Area Nighttime Road Traffic

Survey

JPN-503 1986 Tokyo Main-Road Traffic Survey

JPN-504 1987 Tokyo Side Streets Noise Survey

KOR-295 1987 Seoul Traffic Noise Survey

KOR-475 1980s Seoul Multiple-Source Noise Survey

NET-106 1974 Dordrecht Home Sound Insulation Study

NET-196 1978 Dutch Homes for the Aged

Environmental Noise Study

NET-240 1984 Schiphol Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

NET-255 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Netherlands)

NET-258 1975 Amsterdam Home Sound Insulation Study

NET-276 1983 Netherlands Tram/Road Traffic Noise

Survey

NET-362 1984-85 Arnhem Trolley Bus Introduction

Survey

NIG-486 South-Eastern Nigeria Eight-City Road Traffic

Survey

NOR-397 1999 Oslo Contingent Valuation Noise Survey

NOR-398 1987 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic

Survey

NOR-399 1990 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic

Survey
NOISE SOURCE INDEX (Continued)

-82-

NOR-400 1994 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic

Survey

NOR-401 1996 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic

Survey

NOR-403 1989 Horton Road Traffic Noise Survey

NOR-404 1986 Drammen Road Traffic Noise survey

POR-478 1999 Lisbon Contingent Valuation Road

Traffic Noise Survey

SLO-406 1989 Bratislava Medical Student Survey

SLO-407 1999 Bratislava Medical Student Survey

SPA-272 1981 Valencia City-Wide Survey

SPA-273 1982 Valencia Five-Site Survey

SPA-274 1982 Valencia Single-Site Survey

SPA-313 1984-85 Ganda Three-Site Traffic Noise

Survey

SPA-314 1987-91 Gandía Beach Resort Traffic Noise

Survey

SPA-315 1988 Pamplona Five-Site Noise Survey

SPA-316 1983 Valencia Traffic Noise Survey

SPA-317 1984 Gandía City-Wide Traffic Noise Survey

SPA-330 Madrid Two-Site Traffic Noise Survey

SWE-021 1966-67 Stockholm/Gothenburg Traffic Study

SWE-025 1967 Stockholm Comparative Traffic Noise

Study

SWE-026 1967 Huddinge New Motorway Study

SWE-100 1970s Kungälv Noise Barrier Study

SWE-142 1976 Stockholm Visby Gothenburg Traffic

Noise Study

SWE-165 1976 Gothenburg Tramway Noise Survey

SWE-223 1981 Swedish Sleep Disturbance and Sound

Insulation Study

SWE-303 1986 Gothenburg Sleep Disturbance Pilot

Survey

SWE-344 1988 Gothenburg Psycho-Social Wellbeing

Traffic Survey (Pilot)

SWE-345 1990 Gothenburg Psycho-Social Wellbeing

Traffic Survey (Main)

SWE-359 Gothenburg 12-Area Traffic Noise Survey

SWE-368 1996 Gothenburg Road Traffic Survey

SWE-412 1997 Sollentuna Road/Rail Noise Survey

SWE-415 1997 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey

(Before)

SWE-416 1998 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey

(After, Preliminary)

SWE-417 1999 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey

(After, Primary)

SWE-418 1999 Stockholm Noise Barrier Traffic Survey

SWE-420 1992 Gothenburg Road Traffic Survey

SWI-053 1971 Swiss Three-City Noise Survey

SWI-133 1976 Zurich Street Traffic Noise (Apartments)

Survey

SWI-158 1977 Zurich Pilot Traffic Noise Survey

SWI-159 1977 Swiss N-3 Motorway Study

SWI-173 1978 Zurich Time-of-Day Survey

SWI-312 1984 Visual Context of Noise Survey

(Switzerland)

SWI-469 1999 Swiss Noise Barrier Survey

THA-327 1992 Songkhla Traffic Noise Survey

THA-421 1997-98 Bangkok Road Traffic Noise Survey

TRK-283 1980-84 Istanbul Noise Survey

TRK-367 Istanbul Trans-European Motorway Survey

UKD-009 1961 Central London Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-030 1967 B.R.S. London Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-033 1969 Mixed Road/Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-050 1970-71 Heston Noise Barrier Study

UKD-071 1972 B.R.S. London Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-072 1972 English Road Traffic Survey

UKD-073 1972 Birmingham New Motorway Study

UKD-080 1972 Loughborough Interrupted Traffic Flow

Survey

UKD-118 1975-76 London/Liverpool Panel Survey

UKD-157 1977 London Area Panel Survey

UKD-160 1977 Hampshire Village Noise Study

UKD-162 Greater Manchester Traffic Survey

UKD-176 1978 ISVR Lab/Field Comparison Survey

UKD-237 1983-84 Southern England New Road Opening

Survey

UKD-238 1984 Glasgow Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

UKD-241 1982 Heathrow Combined Aircraft/Road

Traffic Survey

UKD-266 1971-72 Alton By-pass Study (Residents)

UKD-267 1970s Lake District A66 Traffic Change Study

(Residents)

UKD-268 TRRL Multiple-Site Road Traffic Flow Change

Study (Residents)

UKD-270 1983 English Road Traffic Vibration Survey

UKD-277 TRRL Four-Road Laboratory/Field Comparison

Study

UKD-284 1983 English 11-Site Gypsy Traffic Noise

Survey

UKD-297 1985 Follow-up of 1983 New Road Opening

Survey

UKD-298 1985 Follow-up of TRRL Multiple-Site Traffic

Flow Change Study

UKD-325 1989-91 TRL 15-Site Traffic Change Study

UKD-351 1988 TRL 35-Site Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-425 1990s UK Road Resurfacing Survey

UKD-426 UK Road Traffic and Ischemic Heart Disease

Study

UKD-481 UK 30-Site Noise Insulation Treatment

Evaluation Survey

USA-020 1966 USA Three-City Community Noise Study

USA-043 Los Angeles Freeway Five-Site Study

USA-047 1970 Minneapolis Freeway Noise Study

USA-057 USA Vehicle Noise Situation Survey

USA-069 1972 Minneapolis Freeway Noise Barrier Study

USA-070 1972 Eastern USA Four-Community Highway
-83-

Noise Survey

USA-088 1973 U.S.C. Los Angeles Freeway Noise Study

USA-102 1974 USA 24-Site Community Noise Survey

USA-103 1974 Capital Beltway Survey

USA-104 1974 Boston Economic Impact Pretest

USA-105 1974 San Francisco Livable Streets Survey

USA-154 1977 Youngmann Highway Noise Abatement

Study

USA-155 1977 Minnesota Five-Site Freeway Noise

Barrier Study

USA-156 1977 Ohio New Highway Survey

YUG-352 Pancevo Noise and Air Pollution Health Survey

YUG-434 1994 Central Belgrade Traffic Noise Survey

SONIC BOOM

FRA-017 1965 French Regional Sonic Boom Survey

FRA-045 1970 French Sonic Boom Survey

FRA-189 1971 French Concorde Sonic Boom Study

GER-037 1969 Meppen Sonic Boom Field Experiment

SWE-054 1971 Trängslet Sonic Boom Study

SWE-108 1972 Burgsvik Sonic Boom Study

SWE-222 Nausta Research Camp Sonic Boom Study

UKD-010 1963 Welsh Village Impulse Noise (Exercise

Yellow Hammer)

USA-007 1961 St Louis Sonic Boom Study

USA-012 1964 Oklahoma City Sonic Boom Study

USA-023 1967-68 SR-71 Supersonic Aircraft Noise

Study

USA-299 1966 Edwards Air Force Base Resident Sonic

Boom Survey

USA-375 1993-95 Western USA Sonic Boom Study
-84-

CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX

The index is ordered by the year in which the social survey was begun. If the year of the social

survey is not known, the year of the first publication is used. Within year, studies are ordered by

country (indicated by the country identification code) and survey identification number.

1943 Surveys

UKD-001 1943 British Home Noise Survey

1950 Surveys

NET-002 1950 Netherlands Sound Insulation Effects Study

1952 Surveys

UKD-003 1952 Sound Insulation in Flats Survey

1953 Surveys

JPN-005 1953 Osaka/Amagasaki Industrial Noise Survey

USA-004 1953 USA Eight-Airport Noise Survey

1956 Surveys

JPN-190 1956 Kyoto Traffic Noise Survey

1957 Surveys

USA-006 1957 USA Air Force Base Noise Survey

1961 Surveys

UKD-008 1961 Heathrow Aircraft Noise Survey (First

Heathrow Survey)

UKD-009 1961 Central London Traffic Noise Survey

USA-007 1961 St Louis Sonic Boom Study

1963 Surveys

NET-013 1963 Schiphol Airport Survey

SWE-011 1963 Linköping Airport Noise Study

UKD-010 1963 Welsh Village Impulse Noise (Exercise

Yellow Hammer)

1964 Surveys

AUS-014 1964 Vienna Road Traffic Noise Survey

SWE-015 1964-70 Karlstad Artillery Range Noise Study

USA-012 1964 Oklahoma City Sonic Boom Study

1965 Surveys

FRA-016 1965 French Four-Airport Noise Study

FRA-017 1965 French Regional Sonic Boom Survey

FRA-019 1965 Paris Expressway Noise Survey

JPN-018 1965 Osaka Aircraft Noise Survey

1966 Surveys

SWE-021 1966-67 Stockholm/Gothenburg Traffic Study

USA-020 1966 USA Three-City Community Noise Study

USA-299 1966 Edwards Air Force Base Resident Sonic Boom

Survey

1967 Surveys

ITL-318 1967 Ferrara Comparative Traffic Noise Study

SWE-025 1967 Stockholm Comparative Traffic Noise Study

SWE-026 1967 Huddinge New Motorway Study

UKD-024 1967 Heathrow Aircraft Noise Study (Second

Heathrow Survey)

UKD-030 1967 B.R.S. London Traffic Noise Survey

USA-022 1967 USA Four-Airport Survey (Phase I Tracor

Survey)

USA-023 1967-68 SR-71 Supersonic Aircraft Noise Study

1968 Surveys

SAF-028 1968 South Africa Preliminary Aircraft Noise

Survey

UKD-029 1968 Coventry Pilot Railway Noise Survey

USA-027 1968 LAX Aircraft Noise Study

1969 Surveys

AUL-036 1969 Sydney Airport Noise Survey

FRA-041 1969 Paris Road Traffic Noise Study

GER-034 1969 Munich Airport Noise (DFG Aircraft Noise

Study)

GER-037 1969 Meppen Sonic Boom Field Experiment

SWE-035 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study (Sweden)

UKD-033 1969 Mixed Road/Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-038 1969 Central England Railway Survey

USA-031 1969 LAX Aircraft Noise Study

USA-032 1969 USA Three-Airport Survey (Phase II Tracor

Survey)

USA-039 1969-70 San Francisco Three-Street Pilot Study

USA-040 1969 Inglewood Community Noise Survey

USA-043 Los Angeles Freeway Five-Site Study

USA-058 Philadelphia Community Noise Survey

USR-042 USSR 22-Settlement Aircraft Noise Survey

1970 Surveys

FRA-045 1970 French Sonic Boom Survey

JPN-046 1970 Yokota Air Base Study

PUR-188 San Juan Community Noise Survey

SWE-222 Nausta Research Camp Sonic Boom Study

UKD-050 1970-71 Heston Noise Barrier Study

USA-044 1970 USA Small City Airports (Small City Tracor

survey)

USA-047 1970 Minneapolis Freeway Noise Study

USA-048 1970 C.R.P. Inglewood Community Noise Survey
CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX (Continued)

-85-

USA-049 1970 Cedar Rock Drive Neighborhood Noise

Investigation

1971 Surveys

CAN-055 1971 Dorval Aircraft Noise Survey

DEN-519 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study (Denmark)

FRA-056 1971 Orly Aircraft Noise Survey

FRA-189 1971 French Concorde Sonic Boom Study

JPN-376 1971-77 Chiba Multi-Family Dwelling Survey

NOR-520 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study (Norway)

SWE-054 1971 Trängslet Sonic Boom Study

SWI-053 1971 Swiss Three-City Noise Survey

UKD-052 1971 Gatwick Airport Noise Survey

UKD-266 1971-72 Alton By-pass Study (Residents)

USA-051 1971 J.F.K. Dynamic Preferential Runway System

Survey

USA-057 USA Vehicle Noise Situation Survey

1972 Surveys

CAN-076 1972 London/Woodstock Community Noise Survey

CAN-077 1972 Edmonton Community Noise Survey

CAN-078 1972 Calgary Noise Survey

CAN-079 1972 Toronto Community Noise Survey

DEN-075 1972 Copenhagen Traffic Noise Survey

FRA-063 1972 Paris Area Railway Noise Survey

JPN-062 1972 Akishima City Aircraft Noise Survey

JPN-064 1972 Environmental Agency of Japan Shinkansen

Noise Survey

JPN-065 1972 New Tokaido and New Sanyo Shinkansen

Railway Noise

JPN-163 1972 Itami City Osaka Airport Noise Study

JPN-509 1972-81 Kyushu Airport Opening Survey

SWE-100 1970s Kungälv Noise Barrier Study

SWE-108 1972 Burgsvik Sonic Boom Study

UKD-061 1972 Heathrow Airport Noise Pilot Survey

UKD-071 1972 B.R.S. London Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-072 1972 English Road Traffic Survey

UKD-073 1972 Birmingham New Motorway Study

UKD-074 1972 London Construction Site Survey

UKD-080 1972 Loughborough Interrupted Traffic Flow

Survey

USA-059 1972 J.F.K. Airport Noise Survey

USA-060 1972 Portland Northshore Aircraft Survey

USA-066 1972 BART Residential Impact Survey

USA-067 1972 Boulder Community Noise Survey

USA-068 1972 College Park Community Noise Survey

USA-069 1972 Minneapolis Freeway Noise Barrier Study

USA-070 1972 Eastern USA Four-Community Highway

Noise Survey

USA-081 Boulder Newspaper Community Noise Survey

USA-212 1972 Minneapolis St Paul Airport Development

Survey

USA-245 1970s LAX Six-Community Noise Survey

USA-310 1972 Los Angeles Airport Relocated Residents

Survey

1973 Surveys

AUS-093 1973 Vienna Road Traffic Noise Survey

FRA-087 1973 St Cyr L'Ecole General Aviation Noise Survey

FRA-092 1973 French Ten-City Traffic Noise Survey

GER-164 1973 Düsseldorf Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-094 1973-74 Sendai Road Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-086 1973 Kew Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-267 1970s Lake District A66 Traffic Change Study

(Residents)

USA-082 1973 Los Angeles Airport Night Study

USA-083 1973 LAX Airport Noise Study

USA-084 1973 J.F.K. Airport Noise Study

USA-085 1973 Seattle-Tacoma Airport Noise Study

USA-088 1973 U.S.C. Los Angeles Freeway Noise Study

USA-089 1973 Portland-Multnomah Community Noise

Survey

USA-090 1973 E.P.A. Community Noise Questionnaire Pilot

Study

USA-091 1973 Test of Real-Time Personal Annoyance

Monitoring Devices

USA-213 1973 Chicago Construction Site Survey

1974 Surveys

AUL-226 1974 Brisbane S-E Freeway Study

CZE-109 Bratislava Traffic Noise Survey

FRA-098 1974-75 Roissy Airport Before/After Opening Noise

Survey

FRA-099 1974 French National Aircraft Noise Survey

JPN-101 1974 Sendai City Regular Railway Noise Survey

NET-106 1974 Dordrecht Home Sound Insulation Study

POL-198 1974 Warsaw Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-097 1974 English Aircraft Noise Postal Survey

USA-096 1974 Fort Campbell Area Helicopter Noise Survey

USA-102 1974 USA 24-Site Community Noise Survey

USA-103 1974 Capital Beltway Survey

USA-104 1974 Boston Economic Impact Pretest

USA-105 1974 San Francisco Livable Streets Survey

USA-215 1974 Los Angeles International Aircraft Noise

Survey

USA-251 Two-Neighborhood San Francisco Airport Survey

1975 Surveys

AUL-227 1975-76 Australian Three-City Roadway Study

BEL-122 1975 Antwerp Traffic Noise Survey

CAN-120 1975 Western Ontario University Traffic Noise

Survey

CAN-121 1975-76 Southern Ontario Community Survey

CAN-126 Toronto Railway Noise Survey

CHI-230 1975 Beijing Traffic Noise Survey

FRA-113 1975 Orly Airport Noise Study

FRA-124 1975-76 l'Hay les Roses Barrier Survey

FRA-218 1975 Strasbourg Airport Noise Survey
CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX (Continued)

-86-

GER-114 1975 German General Aviation Survey

HKG-125 1975 Hong Kong Fireman Environmental Noise

Survey

HKG-208 Preliminary Hong Kong Fireman Noise Survey

JPN-123 1975 Yokohama Road/Railway Noise Survey

JPN-201 1975 Shinkansen Railway Survey

NET-115 1975 Schiphol/Marssum Aircraft Noise Insulation

Survey

NET-258 1975 Amsterdam Home Sound Insulation Study

SWE-185 1975 Gothenburg Rifle Range Survey

UKD-111 1975-76 English Mental Health Pilot Survey

UKD-112 1975 Luton In-migrants Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-116 1975 British National Railway Noise Survey

UKD-118 1975-76 London/Liverpool Panel Survey

UKD-119 1975 Great Britain Interior Noise Survey

UKD-268 TRRL Multiple-Site Road Traffic Flow Change

Study (Residents)

USA-110 1975 J.F.K. Airport Noise Survey

USA-117 1975 Boulder Noise Survey

USA-129 Albany/Louisville Aircraft Fear Study

USA-300 1975 Rutgers Freshmen Dormitory Noise

Sensitivity Study

1976 Surveys

BEL-107 Preliminary Leuven Traffic Noise Survey

BEL-137 1976 Brussels Traffic Noise Survey

CAN-136 1976 Canada Impulse Noise Survey

CAN-279 1976 Toronto Freeway 401 Privacy Fence Survey

CAN-280 1978 Etobicoke/Ottawa Noise Barrier Study

FRA-131 1976 Orly Medical Effects Pilot Study

FRA-323 1976 Nationwide Noise Survey of France

GER-134 1976 Hamburg Urban Noise Survey

GER-135 1976 Stuttgart Railway/Road Noise Survey

JPN-138 1976 Kanagawa Ward Community Noise Survey

JPN-139 1976 Japanese Road/Railway Noise Study

NET-193 1976 Netherlands Military Airfields Noise Study

NET-194 1976 Netherlands Railway Noise Survey

SWE-142 1976 Stockholm Visby Gothenburg Traffic Noise

Study

SWE-165 1976 Gothenburg Tramway Noise Survey

SWI-133 1976 Zurich Street Traffic Noise (Apartments)

Survey

UKD-130 1976 Heathrow Concorde Noise Survey

UKD-132 1976 Darlington Quiet Town Survey

USA-095 U.S. Census Bureau Annual Housing Surveys

USA-127 1976-77 Dulles Concorde Noise Study

USA-128 1976 Orange County Airport Noise Survey

YUG-141 Two-Area Belgrade Aircraft Noise Study

1977 Surveys

AUS-178 1977 Austrian Road Traffic Survey

BEL-151 1977-78 Belgium Four-Airport Noise Survey

FRA-146 1977 French Light Aircraft Study

FRA-150 1977 Roissy Airport Survey

GER-192 1977-83 German Road/Railway Noise Comparison

Study

GER-246 1977-78 German Six-City Traffic Change Panel

Study

IRN-459 1977 Tehran Community Noise Survey

JPN-140 1977 Camp Fuji Noise Survey

JPN-152 1977 Atugi Military Aircraft Noise Study

NET-149 1977 Schiphol/Marssum Sound Insulation Survey

NET-153 1977 Netherlands Railway Noise Survey

NET-195 1977-78 Netherlands New Railway Line Survey

NET-259 1977 Netherlands Industrial Noise Pilot Survey

NET-261 1977 Netherlands National Noise Survey

SWI-158 1977 Zurich Pilot Traffic Noise Survey

SWI-159 1977 Swiss N-3 Motorway Study

UKD-147 1977 Heathrow Nighttime Pilot Survey

UKD-148 1977 West London (Heathrow) Psychiatric

Morbidity Survey

UKD-157 1977 London Area Panel Survey

UKD-160 1977 Hampshire Village Noise Study

UKD-161 1977 Southampton Hovercraft Noise Survey

UKD-162 Greater Manchester Traffic Survey

UKD-309 1977 Hamble Airfield Survey

USA-143 1977-78 Three-Phase J.F.K. Concorde Noise Study

USA-144 1977-78 F.A.A. J.F.K. Concorde Noise Study

USA-145 1977 Orange County Airport Noise Study

USA-154 1977 Youngmann Highway Noise Abatement Study

USA-155 1977 Minnesota Five-Site Freeway Noise Barrier

Study

USA-156 1977 Ohio New Highway Survey

USA-221 1977 Allentown Community Noise Survey

1978 Surveys

AUL-214 1978 Leichhardt Municipality Complaint

Comparison Survey

CAN-168 1978 Canadian Four-Airport Survey

CAN-169 1978-79 Canadian Five Railway Yard Survey

CAN-174 1978 Canadian National Community Noise Survey

JPN-177 1978 Kanagawa Ward Community Noise Survey

NET-196 1978 Dutch Homes for the Aged Environmental

Noise Study

SWE-228 1978-80 Swedish Railway Study

SWI-173 1978 Zurich Time-of-Day Survey

UKD-175 1978 Southampton Hovercraft Terminal Noise

Survey

UKD-176 1978 ISVR Lab/Field Comparison Survey

UKD-199 1978 Darlington Quiet Town Survey

UKD-220 1978 British Interior Noise Survey

USA-166 1978 Salt Lake Airport Noise Study

USA-167 1978-79 USA Helicopter Survey of Selected

Occupations

USA-170 1978 U.S. Army Impulse Noise Survey

USA-171 1978 Spokane Community Noise Survey

USA-172 1978 Kentucky Urban Noise Survey

USA-202 1978-79 Time-of-Day Study with Annoyance
CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX (Continued)

-87-

Recording Device

USA-216 1978 Electrical Power Line and Transformer Noise

Survey

1979 Surveys

AUL-209 1979 Hornsby Rifle Range Survey

AUL-211 1979 Sydney Airport Study of Type of Noise

Reactions

AUL-244 1979 Sydney Airport Pilot Survey

CAN-181 1979 Canadian Three Airport General Aviation

Study

DEN-200 1979 Danish Railway Noise Survey

FRA-197 1979 French Behavioral Effects of Road Noise

Study

GER-282 1979 Wuppertal/Düsseldorf Traffic Noise Barriers

Study

NET-257 1979 Netherlands Industrial Noise Pilot Survey

POL-184 Polish Railway Noise Survey

SWI-180 1979 Swiss General Aviation Survey

UKD-182 1979 Heathrow/Gatwick Sleep Study

USA-179 1979 Oklahoma City Airport Noise Survey

USA-183 1979 Salt Lake City Community Noise Survey

USA-191 1979 Philadelphia Aircraft Noise Survey

USA-203 1979 Burbank Aircraft Noise Change Study

USA-308 1979 Salt Lake City Stationary Noise Source Survey

1980 Surveys

AUL-210 1980 Australian Five-Airport Survey

AUL-264 1980 Brisbane Traffic Noise Reduction Survey

AUL-265 1980 Brisbane Traffic Noise Increase Survey

BEL-288 1980s Brussels International Airport Noise Survey

GER-278 1980 German Shooting Range Survey

GER-281 1976-77 German Highway Noise Study

GER-511 1980 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Germany)

HKG-187 Hong Kong Socio-Economic Area Road Traffic

Survey

IRQ-229 1980 Baghdad Street Noise Survey

JPN-506 1980s Yomahoko Community Noise Survey

JPN-510 1980s Student Noise Attitudes Study (Japan)

NET-232 1980 Netherlands Industrial Noise Survey

NET-260 1980-81 Netherlands Pile Driver Impulse Noise

Survey

TRK-283 1980-84 Istanbul Noise Survey

UKD-233 1980 British Flats' Sound Insulation Survey

UKD-277 TRRL Four-Road Laboratory/Field Comparison

Study

UKD-305 1980-83 Noise Sensitivity Follow-up Survey

UKD-512 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Britain)

USA-186 1980 Bradley International Airport Noise Survey

USA-205 1980 Bellevue Airport Noise Study

USA-207 1980 John Wayne Airport (Orange County) Survey

USA-217 1980 Aircraft Rating Diary (Pilot) Study

USA-219 1980 Salt Lake City In-Home Aircraft Rating Study

1981 Surveys

CAN-236 1981 Southern Ontario Community Survey

GER-231 1981 Blast Furnace and Road Noise Study

GER-290 1981 German Military Training Area Survey

SPA-272 1981 Valencia City-Wide Survey

SWE-223 1981 Swedish Sleep Disturbance and Sound

Insulation Study

UKD-243 1981 United Kingdom General Aviation Airport

Survey

USA-204 1981 John Wayne Airport Operation Change Study

USA-206 1981 Alabama Three-Site Blast Noise Survey

USA-338 1981 USA Air Force Base Study

YUG-234 1981 Split, Yugoslavia Airport Survey

1982 Surveys

CAN-262 Canadian Party Wall Insulation Pilot Survey

FRA-252 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study (France)

IRE-254 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study (Ireland)

JPN-294 Nagoya City 1980s Cumulative Noise Survey

NET-255 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Netherlands)

NET-263 1982-1983 Netherlands New Dwelling Survey

SPA-273 1982 Valencia Five-Site Survey

SPA-274 1982 Valencia Single-Site Survey

UKD-224 1982 Manchester Night Noise Survey

UKD-225 1982 British Helicopter Disturbance Study

UKD-241 1982 Heathrow Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

UKD-242 1982 United Kingdom Aircraft Noise Index Study

UKD-426 UK Road Traffic and Ischemic Heart Disease Study

USA-250 1982 Decatur General Aviation Airport Survey

USA-301 1982 Westchester Airport Nighttime Noise Change

Study

1983 Surveys

AUL-248 1983 Melbourne Australia Simon and Garfunkel

Concerts

AUL-249 1983 Melbourne Australia David Bowie Concert

AUL-321 1983 Sydney Artillery Range Survey

DEN-380 1983 Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Survey

GER-253 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study (Germany)

GER-516 1983 Apartment Noise Attitudes Study (Germany)

JPN-340 1983 Tokyo Railway Noise Survey

JPN-515 1983 Apartment Noise Attitudes Study (Japan)

NET-276 1983 Netherlands Tram/Road Traffic Noise Survey

SPA-316 1983 Valencia Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-237 1983-84 Southern England New Road Opening

Survey

UKD-270 1983 English Road Traffic Vibration Survey

UKD-284 1983 English 11-Site Gypsy Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-481 UK 30-Site Noise Insulation Treatment Evaluation

Survey

USA-235 1983 Controlled Exposure Helicopter Noise Study
CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX (Continued)

-88-

1984 Surveys

AUL-247 Victoria Australia Entertainment Center Study

FRA-239 1984-1986 French Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

GER-291 1984 Visual Context of Noise Survey (Germany)

JPN-271 Japan Three-Site Construction Noise Survey

JPN-292 1984 Sapporo City Traffic Noise and Vibration

Survey

JPN-440 1984 Fukuoka Road Traffic Noise Survey

NET-240 1984 Schiphol Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

NET-362 1984-85 Arnhem Trolley Bus Introduction Survey

SPA-313 1984-85 Ganda Three-Site Traffic Noise Survey

SPA-317 1984 Gandía City-Wide Traffic Noise Survey

SWI-312 1984 Visual Context of Noise Survey (Switzerland)

UKD-238 1984 Glasgow Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

1985 Surveys

CHI-514 1985 Student Noise Attitudes Study

(Beijing/Tsinghua)

GER-256 Berlin Nighttime Noise Survey

GER-372 1985-86 Ratingen Düsseldorf Road Traffic/Aircraft

Survey

JPN-493 1985-86 Shinkansen/Conventional Rail Noise

Survey

JPN-495 1984 Nagoya Neighborhood Noise Survey

JPN-501 1985 Kawasaki Life-Related Noise Survey

KOR-475 1980s Seoul Multiple-Source Noise Survey

UKD-296 1985 Great Britain Neighborhood Noise Survey

UKD-297 1985 Follow-up of 1983 New Road Opening Survey

UKD-298 1985 Follow-up of TRRL Multiple-Site Traffic Flow

Change Study

USA-513 1985 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Boston)

1986 Surveys

AUL-285 1986 Australian National Noise Survey

AUL-286 1986 Brisbane Noise Survey

AUL-287 1986 Toowoomba Community Noise Survey

AUL-307 1986 Sydney Aircraft/Road Traffic Survey

CHI-386 1986-1989 Chinese Five-City Road Traffic Noise

Survey

CHI-457 1986 Beijing City (Nagoya Comparison) Survey

DEN-381 1986 Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Followup Survey

FRA-289 1986-87 French National Transportation Noise

Survey

GER-275 1986-87 Darmstadt Movers Survey

GER-502 German Noise Change Part of CEC Sleep Study

JPN-503 1986 Tokyo Main-Road Traffic Survey

NET-269 1986 Netherlands Low-Level Military Aircraft

Study

NOR-404 1986 Drammen Road Traffic Noise survey

SPA-302 1986 Valencia Five-Site Survey

SWE-303 1986 Gothenburg Sleep Disturbance Pilot Survey

SWI-304 1986 Swiss Multi-Story Building Sound Insulation

Study

UKD-324 1986 English General Aviation Survey

1987 Surveys

GER-373 1987 Düsseldorf/Ratingen Aircraft/ Road Traffic

Survey

JPN-293 Osaka Aircraft and Environmental Noise Survey

JPN-441 1987 Fukuoka Railway Crossing Noise Survey

JPN-442 1987 Fukuoka 19-Area Community Noise Survey

JPN-448 1987 Sapporo Railway Noise and Vibration Survey

JPN-494 1987 Odawara Sound Environment Survey

JPN-504 1987 Tokyo Side Streets Noise Survey

KOR-295 1987 Seoul Traffic Noise Survey

NET-356 1987 Netherlands National Noise Survey

NOR-398 1987 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

SPA-314 1987-91 Gandía Beach Resort Traffic Noise Survey

1988 Surveys

AUL-306 1988 New South Wales Power Station Survey

GER-363 1988 German Noise Barrier Evaluation Survey

JPN-358 Central Tokyo Combined Residential and Personal

Noise Survey

JPN-453 1988-1990 Hokkaido/Kyushu Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-498 1988-91 Setagaya Tokyo Environmental

Complaints Survey

SPA-315 1988 Pamplona Five-Site Noise Survey

SWE-344 1988 Gothenburg Psycho-Social Wellbeing Traffic

Survey (Pilot)

SWE-360 Swedish Four-Site Shooting Range Noise

Annoyance Survey

SWE-419 1988-93 Swedish Small Airport Noise Survey

UKD-351 1988 TRL 35-Site Traffic Noise Survey

1989 Surveys

AUS-329 1989 Austrian Alps Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-319 1989 Muroran Road/Railway Noise Survey

JPN-341 1989 Sapporo Traffic Noise/Vibration Survey

NOR-311 1989 Oslo Airport Survey

NOR-403 1989 Horton Road Traffic Noise Survey

SLO-406 1989 Bratislava Medical Student Survey

SPA-348 1989-90 Spanish Airport Survey

SWE-365 1989-93 Swedish Railway Survey

UKD-325 1989-91 TRL 15-Site Traffic Change Study

1990 Surveys

CAN-322 1990 Toronto Air Conditioner Survey

ITL-350 1990 Modena Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-343 1990-93 Tokyo Five-Area Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-447 1990 Sapporo Traffic Noise and Vibration Survey

JPN-517 1990, 1995 Japanese/English Questionnaire Testing

Study (Osaka)

NET-354 1990 Marnewaard Shooting Range Residential

Survey
CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX (Continued)

-89-

NOR-366 1990-91 Værnes Aircraft Military Exercise Survey

NOR-399 1990 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

SWE-345 1990 Gothenburg Psycho-Social Wellbeing Traffic

Survey (Main)

SWE-359 Gothenburg 12-Area Traffic Noise Survey

THA-455 1990-91 Bangkok Personal Noise Exposure Survey

UKD-347 1990 Manchester Airport Sleep Survey

UKD-355 1990 East London Docklands Light Rail Survey

1991 Surveys

AUL-332 1991 Brisbane Traffic Noise Survey

FRA-336 1991 TGV High Speed Train Pilot Survey

FRA-346 1991 French Before/After Noise Abatement Survey

GER-454 1991 German Artillery and Road Traffic Noise

Survey

JPN-326 1991 Muroran Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-438 1991 Fukuoka Green Areas Noise Survey

JPN-449 1991 Sapporo Railway Noise and Vibration Survey

JPN-492 1991 Yokohama Sound Environment Survey

UKD-339 1991 United Kingdom Four-Airport Sleep Survey

UKD-423 1991 England/Wales Environmental Noise Survey

UKD-436 London/Birmingham Converted Flats Survey

USA-349 Atlanta Airport Acoustical Insulation Survey

1992 Surveys

AUL-384 1992 Sydney Aircraft Noise Amelioration Attitudes

Survey

DEN-333 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study (Denmark)

FRA-342 1992 French Home Insulation Survey

GER-335 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study (Germany)

GRE-331 1992 Rhodes Residential Noise Survey

JPN-377 1992-95 Tokyo Multi-Family Dwelling Study

JPN-439 1992 Fukuoka Green Areas Survey

JPN-497 1992 Itabashi Tokyo Environmental Complaints

Survey

NET-334 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study (Netherlands)

NOR-328 1992-93 Bodö Aircraft Military Exercise Survey

SWE-420 1992 Gothenburg Road Traffic Survey

THA-327 1992 Songkhla Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-484 1992-94 Great Britain Insulation Complaint Survey

1993 Surveys

EGY-357 Alexandria Tram Noise Study

FRA-364 1993-94 French 18-Site Time-Of-Day Study

FRA-396 1993 TGV High Speed Train Survey

GER-374 1993 Greifswald Traffic Noise Survey

GER-463 1993-94 Berlin Women Environmental Health

Survey

JPN-353 1992 Chatan Town Kadena Air Base Survey

JPN-443 1993 Fukuoka 12-Area Community Noise Survey

JPN-451 1993 Kumamoto Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-452 1993 Tomakomai Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-505 1993 Osaka Free-Response Industrial Noise Survey

NET-361 1993 Netherlands National Environmental Survey

SPA-320 Zaragoza City Noise Survey

SPA-330 Madrid Two-Site Traffic Noise Survey

SWE-337 Swedish Low Frequency Heat Pump Noise Study

USA-375 1993-95 Western USA Sonic Boom Study

USA-433 1993 LAX/Castle AFB Behavioral Awakening

Study

USA-490 1993-94 USA Individual Sound Noticeability Study

YUG-352 Pancevo Noise and Air Pollution Health Survey

1994 Surveys

AUL-383 1994-95 Sydney Airport Noise Change Survey

GER-472 1994 1996 Düsseldorf Activity Disturbance Study

JPN-370 1994-95 Kyushu Railway Survey

JPN-446 1994 Sapporo Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-496 1994-96 Tokyo Trunk Road Noise Survey

JPN-499 Tokyo Four-Area Nighttime Road Traffic Survey

NOR-400 1994 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

SPA-408 1994-95 Spanish Underground Railway Noise

Survey

UKD-425 1990s UK Road Resurfacing Survey

USA-430 1994-95 Denver Airport Opening Sleep Disturbance

Study

YUG-434 1994 Central Belgrade Traffic Noise Survey

1995 Surveys

AUL-456 1995 Sydney Airport Ku-ring-gai Noise Survey

AUL-461 1995-96 Four-Phase Sydney Road Traffic Noise

Survey

CAN-385 1990s Vancouver Airport Noise Change Survey

CZE-402 1995-97 Czech Noise/Public Health Survey

GER-471 1995-96 Germany Rail-Grinding Noise Reduction

Study (Pilot)

GER-473 1995 Düsseldorf Airport Noise Survey

HUN-458 1995 Hungary Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-445 1995-96 Kadena General Health Questionnaire

Survey

JPN-450 1995-96 Kyushu Expressway Survey

SWE-414 1995-96 Lund Railway Noise Barrier Survey

TRK-367 Istanbul Trans-European Motorway Survey

USA-431 1995 Seattle-Tacoma Airport Noise Survey

USA-518 1995 Japanese/English Questionnaire Testing Study

(Boston)

1996 Surveys

BRA-474 1994 Porto Alegre Noise Survey

GER-464 Oldenburg Noise Situation Investigation

GER-465 1996-97 German Sleep Disturbance Survey

GER-470 1996-97 German Road/Rail Traffic Noise Survey

GER-480 1996-97 German Road/Rail Sleep Study

JPN-369 1996 Kumamoto Road Traffic Survey

JPN-444 1996-97 Kadena/Futenma Military Aircraft Noise

Survey

JPN-491 1996 Osaka International Airport Noise Survey

JPN-507 1996 Nishijin Textile Neighborhood Noise Survey
CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX (Continued)

-90-

NET-371 1996-97 Schiphol Airport GES Survey

NIG-485 Nigeria Eight-City Noise Survey

NOR-401 1996 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

OMA-476 1996-98 Oman Sound Environment Survey

SPA-409 Pozuelo de Alarcón Two-Area Acoustical

Environment Survey

SWE-368 1996 Gothenburg Road Traffic Survey

SWE-413 1996 Kungsbacka Railway Noise Countermeasures

Study

SWE-437 Swedish Eight-Range Heavy Weapons Noise Survey

UKD-427 1996-97 Heathrow Area Children Noise Survey

USA-428 1996 Minneapolis-St Paul Aircraft Mitigation

Preference Survey

USA-435 1996 Olympic Games Aircraft Noise Sleep Study

1997 Surveys

FRA-393 1997 France Road/Railway Noise Survey

FRA-394 1997 Besançon Road Traffic Noise Survey

GER-467 1997 ICE High-Speed Railway Noise Survey

GER-479 1997-98 Germany Rail-Grinding Noise Reduction

Study (Primary)

JPN-382 1997-98 Sapporo Road Traffic Noise Survey

NET-462 1997 Netherlands Home Insulation Survey

NOR-405 1997 Norwegian Survey of Living Conditions

POL-477 1997 Warsaw Low-Frequency Interior Noise Study

SWE-412 1997 Sollentuna Road/Rail Noise Survey

SWE-415 1997 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey (Before)

THA-421 1997-98 Bangkok Road Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-422 1997 English Residential Soundproofing Survey

USA-432 1997 LAX Low-Frequency Noise Survey

1998 Surveys

AUS-488 1998 Tyrol Children/Mothers Noise Survey

AUS-521 Austrian Transportation Noise and Blood Pressure

Survey

DEN-388 1998 Danish Speed Bump Noise Survey

DEN-389 1998 Danish Road Traffic Noise Barrier Study

FRA-391 1998-99 Orly Airport Contingent Valuation Noise

Survey

FRA-392 1998 Paris "Zone 30" Noise Survey

FRA-395 1998 Orly/Roissy Airport Noise Survey

GER-466 1998 Düsseldorf/Dortmund Airport Noise

Information Survey

NET-378 1998 Rotterdam-Ruhrgebiet Freight Railway Pilot

Study

NET-379 1998 Groningen Eelde Airport Survey

NET-468 1998 Schiphol Sleep Disturbance Pilot Survey

SPA-410 1999 Pamplona Contingent Valuation Noise Survey

SPA-411 1998 Altet-Alicante Airport Noise Survey

SWE-416 1998 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey (After,

Preliminary)

1999 Surveys

AUS-487 1998 Inn Valley Road/Railway Noise Survey

DEN-387 1999-2000 Øster Søgade Copenhagen Porous

Asphalt Survey

DEN-390 1999 Aarhus Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-500 1999 Osaka Aircraft Noise and Health Survey

NET-460 1993 Dutch Artillery Range Noise Annoyance and

Startle Survey

NOR-397 1999 Oslo Contingent Valuation Noise Survey

POR-478 1999 Lisbon Contingent Valuation Road Traffic

Noise Survey

SLO-407 1999 Bratislava Medical Student Survey

SWE-417 1999 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey (After,

Primary)

SWE-418 1999 Stockholm Noise Barrier Traffic Survey

SWI-469 1999 Swiss Noise Barrier Survey

UKD-424 1999 Bristol Community Noise Survey

UKD-482 1999-2000 UK 5-Airport Night Noise Perception

Survey

UKD-483 1999 Manchester Nighttime Aircraft Noise Trial

Methodology Study

UKD-489 1999-2000 UK 4-Airport Night Noise Mail Survey

USA-429 1999 Minneapolis-St Paul Airport Noise Survey

2000 Surveys

JPN-508 Toyonaka City Free-Response Noise Survey

NIG-486 South-Eastern Nigeria Eight-City Road Traffic

Survey
-91-

SERIAL NUMBER INDEX

This index is ordered by the unique, three-digit, numeric serial number which forms the second

part of the survey identification number. Most serial numbers from 001 to 187 were assigned in

ascending order by year of the social survey.

UKD-001 1943 British Home Noise Survey

NET-002 1950 Netherlands Sound Insulation Effects Study

UKD-003 1952 Sound Insulation in Flats Survey

USA-004 1953 USA Eight-Airport Noise Survey

JPN-005 1953 Osaka/Amagasaki Industrial Noise Survey

USA-006 1957 USA Air Force Base Noise Survey

USA-007 1961 St Louis Sonic Boom Study

UKD-008 1961 Heathrow Aircraft Noise Survey (First

Heathrow Survey)

UKD-009 1961 Central London Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-010 1963 Welsh Village Impulse Noise (Exercise Yellow

Hammer)

SWE-011 1963 Linköping Airport Noise Study

USA-012 1964 Oklahoma City Sonic Boom Study

NET-013 1963 Schiphol Airport Survey

AUS-014 1964 Vienna Road Traffic Noise Survey

SWE-015 1964-70 Karlstad Artillery Range Noise Study

FRA-016 1965 French Four-Airport Noise Study

FRA-017 1965 French Regional Sonic Boom Survey

JPN-018 1965 Osaka Aircraft Noise Survey

FRA-019 1965 Paris Expressway Noise Survey

USA-020 1966 USA Three-City Community Noise Study

SWE-021 1966-67 Stockholm/Gothenburg Traffic Study

USA-022 1967 USA Four-Airport Survey (Phase I Tracor

Survey)

USA-023 1967-68 SR-71 Supersonic Aircraft Noise Study

UKD-024 1967 Heathrow Aircraft Noise Study (Second

Heathrow Survey)

SWE-025 1967 Stockholm Comparative Traffic Noise Study

SWE-026 1967 Huddinge New Motorway Study

USA-027 1968 LAX Aircraft Noise Study

SAF-028 1968 South Africa Preliminary Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-029 1968 Coventry Pilot Railway Noise Survey

UKD-030 1967 B.R.S. London Traffic Noise Survey

USA-031 1969 LAX Aircraft Noise Study

USA-032 1969 USA Three-Airport Survey (Phase II Tracor

Survey)

UKD-033 1969 Mixed Road/Aircraft Noise Survey

GER-034 1969 Munich Airport Noise (DFG Aircraft Noise

Study)

SWE-035 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study (Sweden)

AUL-036 1969 Sydney Airport Noise Survey

GER-037 1969 Meppen Sonic Boom Field Experiment

UKD-038 1969 Central England Railway Survey

USA-039 1969-70 San Francisco Three-Street Pilot Study

USA-040 1969 Inglewood Community Noise Survey

FRA-041 1969 Paris Road Traffic Noise Study

USR-042 USSR 22-Settlement Aircraft Noise Survey

USA-043 Los Angeles Freeway Five-Site Study

USA-044 1970 USA Small City Airports (Small City Tracor

survey)

FRA-045 1970 French Sonic Boom Survey

JPN-046 1970 Yokota Air Base Study

USA-047 1970 Minneapolis Freeway Noise Study

USA-048 1970 C.R.P. Inglewood Community Noise Survey

USA-049 1970 Cedar Rock Drive Neighborhood Noise

Investigation

UKD-050 1970-71 Heston Noise Barrier Study

USA-051 1971 J.F.K. Dynamic Preferential Runway System

Survey

UKD-052 1971 Gatwick Airport Noise Survey

SWI-053 1971 Swiss Three-City Noise Survey

SWE-054 1971 Trängslet Sonic Boom Study

CAN-055 1971 Dorval Aircraft Noise Survey

FRA-056 1971 Orly Aircraft Noise Survey

USA-057 USA Vehicle Noise Situation Survey

USA-058 Philadelphia Community Noise Survey

USA-059 1972 J.F.K. Airport Noise Survey

USA-060 1972 Portland Northshore Aircraft Survey

UKD-061 1972 Heathrow Airport Noise Pilot Survey

JPN-062 1972 Akishima City Aircraft Noise Survey

FRA-063 1972 Paris Area Railway Noise Survey

JPN-064 1972 Environmental Agency of Japan Shinkansen

Noise Survey

JPN-065 1972 New Tokaido and New Sanyo Shinkansen

Railway Noise

USA-066 1972 BART Residential Impact Survey

USA-067 1972 Boulder Community Noise Survey

USA-068 1972 College Park Community Noise Survey

USA-069 1972 Minneapolis Freeway Noise Barrier Study

USA-070 1972 Eastern USA Four-Community Highway Noise

Survey

UKD-071 1972 B.R.S. London Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-072 1972 English Road Traffic Survey

UKD-073 1972 Birmingham New Motorway Study

UKD-074 1972 London Construction Site Survey

DEN-075 1972 Copenhagen Traffic Noise Survey

CAN-076 1972 London/Woodstock Community Noise Survey
SERIAL NUMBER INDEX (Continued)

-92-

CAN-077 1972 Edmonton Community Noise Survey

CAN-078 1972 Calgary Noise Survey

CAN-079 1972 Toronto Community Noise Survey

UKD-080 1972 Loughborough Interrupted Traffic Flow Survey

USA-081 Boulder Newspaper Community Noise Survey

USA-082 1973 Los Angeles Airport Night Study

USA-083 1973 LAX Airport Noise Study

USA-084 1973 J.F.K. Airport Noise Study

USA-085 1973 Seattle-Tacoma Airport Noise Study

UKD-086 1973 Kew Aircraft Noise Survey

FRA-087 1973 St Cyr L'Ecole General Aviation Noise Survey

USA-088 1973 U.S.C. Los Angeles Freeway Noise Study

USA-089 1973 Portland-Multnomah Community Noise Survey

USA-090 1973 E.P.A. Community Noise Questionnaire Pilot

Study

USA-091 1973 Test of Real-Time Personal Annoyance

Monitoring Devices

FRA-092 1973 French Ten-City Traffic Noise Survey

AUS-093 1973 Vienna Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-094 1973-74 Sendai Road Traffic Noise Survey

USA-095 U.S. Census Bureau Annual Housing Surveys

USA-096 1974 Fort Campbell Area Helicopter Noise Survey

UKD-097 1974 English Aircraft Noise Postal Survey

FRA-098 1974-75 Roissy Airport Before/After Opening Noise

Survey

FRA-099 1974 French National Aircraft Noise Survey

SWE-100 1970s Kungälv Noise Barrier Study

JPN-101 1974 Sendai City Regular Railway Noise Survey

USA-102 1974 USA 24-Site Community Noise Survey

USA-103 1974 Capital Beltway Survey

USA-104 1974 Boston Economic Impact Pretest

USA-105 1974 San Francisco Livable Streets Survey

NET-106 1974 Dordrecht Home Sound Insulation Study

BEL-107 Preliminary Leuven Traffic Noise Survey

SWE-108 1972 Burgsvik Sonic Boom Study

CZE-109 Bratislava Traffic Noise Survey

USA-110 1975 J.F.K. Airport Noise Survey

UKD-111 1975-76 English Mental Health Pilot Survey

UKD-112 1975 Luton In-migrants Aircraft Noise Survey

FRA-113 1975 Orly Airport Noise Study

GER-114 1975 German General Aviation Survey

NET-115 1975 Schiphol/Marssum Aircraft Noise Insulation

Survey

UKD-116 1975 British National Railway Noise Survey

USA-117 1975 Boulder Noise Survey

UKD-118 1975-76 London/Liverpool Panel Survey

UKD-119 1975 Great Britain Interior Noise Survey

CAN-120 1975 Western Ontario University Traffic Noise

Survey

CAN-121 1975-76 Southern Ontario Community Survey

BEL-122 1975 Antwerp Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-123 1975 Yokohama Road/Railway Noise Survey

FRA-124 1975-76 l'Hay les Roses Barrier Survey

HKG-125 1975 Hong Kong Fireman Environmental Noise

Survey

CAN-126 Toronto Railway Noise Survey

USA-127 1976-77 Dulles Concorde Noise Study

USA-128 1976 Orange County Airport Noise Survey

USA-129 Albany/Louisville Aircraft Fear Study

UKD-130 1976 Heathrow Concorde Noise Survey

FRA-131 1976 Orly Medical Effects Pilot Study

UKD-132 1976 Darlington Quiet Town Survey

SWI-133 1976 Zurich Street Traffic Noise (Apartments) Survey

GER-134 1976 Hamburg Urban Noise Survey

GER-135 1976 Stuttgart Railway/Road Noise Survey

CAN-136 1976 Canada Impulse Noise Survey

BEL-137 1976 Brussels Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-138 1976 Kanagawa Ward Community Noise Survey

JPN-139 1976 Japanese Road/Railway Noise Study

JPN-140 1977 Camp Fuji Noise Survey

YUG-141 Two-Area Belgrade Aircraft Noise Study

SWE-142 1976 Stockholm Visby Gothenburg Traffic Noise

Study

USA-143 1977-78 Three-Phase J.F.K. Concorde Noise Study

USA-144 1977-78 F.A.A. J.F.K. Concorde Noise Study

USA-145 1977 Orange County Airport Noise Study

FRA-146 1977 French Light Aircraft Study

UKD-147 1977 Heathrow Nighttime Pilot Survey

UKD-148 1977 West London (Heathrow) Psychiatric Morbidity

Survey

NET-149 1977 Schiphol/Marssum Sound Insulation Survey

FRA-150 1977 Roissy Airport Survey

BEL-151 1977-78 Belgium Four-Airport Noise Survey

JPN-152 1977 Atugi Military Aircraft Noise Study

NET-153 1977 Netherlands Railway Noise Survey

USA-154 1977 Youngmann Highway Noise Abatement Study

USA-155 1977 Minnesota Five-Site Freeway Noise Barrier

Study

USA-156 1977 Ohio New Highway Survey

UKD-157 1977 London Area Panel Survey

SWI-158 1977 Zurich Pilot Traffic Noise Survey

SWI-159 1977 Swiss N-3 Motorway Study

UKD-160 1977 Hampshire Village Noise Study

UKD-161 1977 Southampton Hovercraft Noise Survey

UKD-162 Greater Manchester Traffic Survey

JPN-163 1972 Itami City Osaka Airport Noise Study

GER-164 1973 Düsseldorf Traffic Noise Survey

SWE-165 1976 Gothenburg Tramway Noise Survey

USA-166 1978 Salt Lake Airport Noise Study

USA-167 1978-79 USA Helicopter Survey of Selected

Occupations

CAN-168 1978 Canadian Four-Airport Survey

CAN-169 1978-79 Canadian Five Railway Yard Survey

USA-170 1978 U.S. Army Impulse Noise Survey

USA-171 1978 Spokane Community Noise Survey

USA-172 1978 Kentucky Urban Noise Survey

SWI-173 1978 Zurich Time-of-Day Survey

CAN-174 1978 Canadian National Community Noise Survey
SERIAL NUMBER INDEX (Continued)

-93-

UKD-175 1978 Southampton Hovercraft Terminal Noise Survey

UKD-176 1978 ISVR Lab/Field Comparison Survey

JPN-177 1978 Kanagawa Ward Community Noise Survey

AUS-178 1977 Austrian Road Traffic Survey

USA-179 1979 Oklahoma City Airport Noise Survey

SWI-180 1979 Swiss General Aviation Survey

CAN-181 1979 Canadian Three Airport General Aviation Study

UKD-182 1979 Heathrow/Gatwick Sleep Study

USA-183 1979 Salt Lake City Community Noise Survey

POL-184 Polish Railway Noise Survey

SWE-185 1975 Gothenburg Rifle Range Survey

USA-186 1980 Bradley International Airport Noise Survey

HKG-187 Hong Kong Socio-Economic Area Road Traffic

Survey

PUR-188 San Juan Community Noise Survey

FRA-189 1971 French Concorde Sonic Boom Study

JPN-190 1956 Kyoto Traffic Noise Survey

USA-191 1979 Philadelphia Aircraft Noise Survey

GER-192 1977-83 German Road/Railway Noise Comparison

Study

NET-193 1976 Netherlands Military Airfields Noise Study

NET-194 1976 Netherlands Railway Noise Survey

NET-195 1977-78 Netherlands New Railway Line Survey

NET-196 1978 Dutch Homes for the Aged Environmental

Noise Study

FRA-197 1979 French Behavioral Effects of Road Noise Study

POL-198 1974 Warsaw Aircraft Noise Survey

UKD-199 1978 Darlington Quiet Town Survey

DEN-200 1979 Danish Railway Noise Survey

JPN-201 1975 Shinkansen Railway Survey

USA-202 1978-79 Time-of-Day Study with Annoyance

Recording Device

USA-203 1979 Burbank Aircraft Noise Change Study

USA-204 1981 John Wayne Airport Operation Change Study

USA-205 1980 Bellevue Airport Noise Study

USA-206 1981 Alabama Three-Site Blast Noise Survey

USA-207 1980 John Wayne Airport (Orange County) Survey

HKG-208 Preliminary Hong Kong Fireman Noise Survey

AUL-209 1979 Hornsby Rifle Range Survey

AUL-210 1980 Australian Five-Airport Survey

AUL-211 1979 Sydney Airport Study of Type of Noise

Reactions

USA-212 1972 Minneapolis St Paul Airport Development

Survey

USA-213 1973 Chicago Construction Site Survey

AUL-214 1978 Leichhardt Municipality Complaint Comparison

Survey

USA-215 1974 Los Angeles International Aircraft Noise Survey

USA-216 1978 Electrical Power Line and Transformer Noise

Survey

USA-217 1980 Aircraft Rating Diary (Pilot) Study

FRA-218 1975 Strasbourg Airport Noise Survey

USA-219 1980 Salt Lake City In-Home Aircraft Rating Study

UKD-220 1978 British Interior Noise Survey

USA-221 1977 Allentown Community Noise Survey

SWE-222 Nausta Research Camp Sonic Boom Study

SWE-223 1981 Swedish Sleep Disturbance and Sound

Insulation Study

UKD-224 1982 Manchester Night Noise Survey

UKD-225 1982 British Helicopter Disturbance Study

AUL-226 1974 Brisbane S-E Freeway Study

AUL-227 1975-76 Australian Three-City Roadway Study

SWE-228 1978-80 Swedish Railway Study

IRQ-229 1980 Baghdad Street Noise Survey

CHI-230 1975 Beijing Traffic Noise Survey

GER-231 1981 Blast Furnace and Road Noise Study

NET-232 1980 Netherlands Industrial Noise Survey

UKD-233 1980 British Flats' Sound Insulation Survey

YUG-234 1981 Split, Yugoslavia Airport Survey

USA-235 1983 Controlled Exposure Helicopter Noise Study

CAN-236 1981 Southern Ontario Community Survey

UKD-237 1983-84 Southern England New Road Opening

Survey

UKD-238 1984 Glasgow Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

FRA-239 1984-1986 French Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

NET-240 1984 Schiphol Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

UKD-241 1982 Heathrow Combined Aircraft/Road Traffic

Survey

UKD-242 1982 United Kingdom Aircraft Noise Index Study

UKD-243 1981 United Kingdom General Aviation Airport

Survey

AUL-244 1979 Sydney Airport Pilot Survey

USA-245 1970s LAX Six-Community Noise Survey

GER-246 1977-78 German Six-City Traffic Change Panel

Study

AUL-247 Victoria Australia Entertainment Center Study

AUL-248 1983 Melbourne Australia Simon and Garfunkel

Concerts

AUL-249 1983 Melbourne Australia David Bowie Concert

USA-250 1982 Decatur General Aviation Airport Survey

USA-251 Two-Neighborhood San Francisco Airport Survey

FRA-252 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study (France)

GER-253 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study (Germany)

IRE-254 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study (Ireland)

NET-255 1982-83 CEC Impulse Noise Field Study

(Netherlands)

GER-256 Berlin Nighttime Noise Survey

NET-257 1979 Netherlands Industrial Noise Pilot Survey

NET-258 1975 Amsterdam Home Sound Insulation Study

NET-259 1977 Netherlands Industrial Noise Pilot Survey

NET-260 1980-81 Netherlands Pile Driver Impulse Noise

Survey

NET-261 1977 Netherlands National Noise Survey

CAN-262 Canadian Party Wall Insulation Pilot Survey

NET-263 1982-1983 Netherlands New Dwelling Survey
SERIAL NUMBER INDEX (Continued)

-94-

AUL-264 1980 Brisbane Traffic Noise Reduction Survey

AUL-265 1980 Brisbane Traffic Noise Increase Survey

UKD-266 1971-72 Alton By-pass Study (Residents)

UKD-267 1970s Lake District A66 Traffic Change Study

(Residents)

UKD-268 TRRL Multiple-Site Road Traffic Flow Change Study

(Residents)

NET-269 1986 Netherlands Low-Level Military Aircraft Study

UKD-270 1983 English Road Traffic Vibration Survey

JPN-271 Japan Three-Site Construction Noise Survey

SPA-272 1981 Valencia City-Wide Survey

SPA-273 1982 Valencia Five-Site Survey

SPA-274 1982 Valencia Single-Site Survey

GER-275 1986-87 Darmstadt Movers Survey

NET-276 1983 Netherlands Tram/Road Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-277 TRRL Four-Road Laboratory/Field Comparison Study

GER-278 1980 German Shooting Range Survey

CAN-279 1976 Toronto Freeway 401 Privacy Fence Survey

CAN-280 1978 Etobicoke/Ottawa Noise Barrier Study

GER-281 1976-77 German Highway Noise Study

GER-282 1979 Wuppertal/Düsseldorf Traffic Noise Barriers

Study

TRK-283 1980-84 Istanbul Noise Survey

UKD-284 1983 English 11-Site Gypsy Traffic Noise Survey

AUL-285 1986 Australian National Noise Survey

AUL-286 1986 Brisbane Noise Survey

AUL-287 1986 Toowoomba Community Noise Survey

BEL-288 1980s Brussels International Airport Noise Survey

FRA-289 1986-87 French National Transportation Noise

Survey

GER-290 1981 German Military Training Area Survey

GER-291 1984 Visual Context of Noise Survey (Germany)

JPN-292 1984 Sapporo City Traffic Noise and Vibration

Survey

JPN-293 Osaka Aircraft and Environmental Noise Survey

JPN-294 Nagoya City 1980s Cumulative Noise Survey

KOR-295 1987 Seoul Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-296 1985 Great Britain Neighborhood Noise Survey

UKD-297 1985 Follow-up of 1983 New Road Opening Survey

UKD-298 1985 Follow-up of TRRL Multiple-Site Traffic Flow

Change Study

USA-299 1966 Edwards Air Force Base Resident Sonic Boom

Survey

USA-300 1975 Rutgers Freshmen Dormitory Noise Sensitivity

Study

USA-301 1982 Westchester Airport Nighttime Noise Change

Study

SPA-302 1986 Valencia Five-Site Survey

SWE-303 1986 Gothenburg Sleep Disturbance Pilot Survey

SWI-304 1986 Swiss Multi-Story Building Sound Insulation

Study

UKD-305 1980-83 Noise Sensitivity Follow-up Survey

AUL-306 1988 New South Wales Power Station Survey

AUL-307 1986 Sydney Aircraft/Road Traffic Survey

USA-308 1979 Salt Lake City Stationary Noise Source Survey

UKD-309 1977 Hamble Airfield Survey

USA-310 1972 Los Angeles Airport Relocated Residents

Survey

NOR-311 1989 Oslo Airport Survey

SWI-312 1984 Visual Context of Noise Survey (Switzerland)

SPA-313 1984-85 Ganda Three-Site Traffic Noise Survey

SPA-314 1987-91 Gandía Beach Resort Traffic Noise Survey

SPA-315 1988 Pamplona Five-Site Noise Survey

SPA-316 1983 Valencia Traffic Noise Survey

SPA-317 1984 Gandía City-Wide Traffic Noise Survey

ITL-318 1967 Ferrara Comparative Traffic Noise Study

JPN-319 1989 Muroran Road/Railway Noise Survey

SPA-320 Zaragoza City Noise Survey

AUL-321 1983 Sydney Artillery Range Survey

CAN-322 1990 Toronto Air Conditioner Survey

FRA-323 1976 Nationwide Noise Survey of France

UKD-324 1986 English General Aviation Survey

UKD-325 1989-91 TRL 15-Site Traffic Change Study

JPN-326 1991 Muroran Traffic Noise Survey

THA-327 1992 Songkhla Traffic Noise Survey

NOR-328 1992-93 Bodö Aircraft Military Exercise Survey

AUS-329 1989 Austrian Alps Road Traffic Noise Survey

SPA-330 Madrid Two-Site Traffic Noise Survey

GRE-331 1992 Rhodes Residential Noise Survey

AUL-332 1991 Brisbane Traffic Noise Survey

DEN-333 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study (Denmark)

NET-334 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study (Netherlands)

GER-335 1992 CEC Wind Turbine Noise Study (Germany)

FRA-336 1991 TGV High Speed Train Pilot Survey

SWE-337 Swedish Low Frequency Heat Pump Noise Study

USA-338 1981 USA Air Force Base Study

UKD-339 1991 United Kingdom Four-Airport Sleep Survey

JPN-340 1983 Tokyo Railway Noise Survey

JPN-341 1989 Sapporo Traffic Noise/Vibration Survey

FRA-342 1992 French Home Insulation Survey

JPN-343 1990-93 Tokyo Five-Area Traffic Noise Survey

SWE-344 1988 Gothenburg Psycho-Social Wellbeing Traffic

Survey (Pilot)

SWE-345 1990 Gothenburg Psycho-Social Wellbeing Traffic

Survey (Main)

FRA-346 1991 French Before/After Noise Abatement Survey

UKD-347 1990 Manchester Airport Sleep Survey

SPA-348 1989-90 Spanish Airport Survey

USA-349 Atlanta Airport Acoustical Insulation Survey

ITL-350 1990 Modena Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-351 1988 TRL 35-Site Traffic Noise Survey

YUG-352 Pancevo Noise and Air Pollution Health Survey

JPN-353 1992 Chatan Town Kadena Air Base Survey

NET-354 1990 Marnewaard Shooting Range Residential

Survey

UKD-355 1990 East London Docklands Light Rail Survey

NET-356 1987 Netherlands National Noise Survey

EGY-357 Alexandria Tram Noise Study
SERIAL NUMBER INDEX (Continued)

-95-

JPN-358 Central Tokyo Combined Residential and Personal

Noise Survey

SWE-359 Gothenburg 12-Area Traffic Noise Survey

SWE-360 Swedish Four-Site Shooting Range Noise Annoyance

Survey

NET-361 1993 Netherlands National Environmental Survey

NET-362 1984-85 Arnhem Trolley Bus Introduction Survey

GER-363 1988 German Noise Barrier Evaluation Survey

FRA-364 1993-94 French 18-Site Time-Of-Day Study

SWE-365 1989-93 Swedish Railway Survey

NOR-366 1990-91 Værnes Aircraft Military Exercise Survey

TRK-367 Istanbul Trans-European Motorway Survey

SWE-368 1996 Gothenburg Road Traffic Survey

JPN-369 1996 Kumamoto Road Traffic Survey

JPN-370 1994-95 Kyushu Railway Survey

NET-371 1996-97 Schiphol Airport GES Survey

GER-372 1985-86 Ratingen Düsseldorf Road Traffic/Aircraft

Survey

GER-373 1987 Düsseldorf/Ratingen Aircraft/ Road Traffic

Survey

GER-374 1993 Greifswald Traffic Noise Survey

USA-375 1993-95 Western USA Sonic Boom Study

JPN-376 1971-77 Chiba Multi-Family Dwelling Survey

JPN-377 1992-95 Tokyo Multi-Family Dwelling Study

NET-378 1998 Rotterdam-Ruhrgebiet Freight Railway Pilot

Study

NET-379 1998 Groningen Eelde Airport Survey

DEN-380 1983 Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Survey

DEN-381 1986 Copenhagen Kastrup Airport Followup Survey

JPN-382 1997-98 Sapporo Road Traffic Noise Survey

AUL-383 1994-95 Sydney Airport Noise Change Survey

AUL-384 1992 Sydney Aircraft Noise Amelioration Attitudes

Survey

CAN-385 1990s Vancouver Airport Noise Change Survey

CHI-386 1986-1989 Chinese Five-City Road Traffic Noise

Survey

DEN-387 1999-2000 Øster Søgade Copenhagen Porous Asphalt

Survey

DEN-388 1998 Danish Speed Bump Noise Survey

DEN-389 1998 Danish Road Traffic Noise Barrier Study

DEN-390 1999 Aarhus Road Traffic Noise Survey

FRA-391 1998-99 Orly Airport Contingent Valuation Noise

Survey

FRA-392 1998 Paris "Zone 30" Noise Survey

FRA-393 1997 France Road/Railway Noise Survey

FRA-394 1997 Besançon Road Traffic Noise Survey

FRA-395 1998 Orly/Roissy Airport Noise Survey

FRA-396 1993 TGV High Speed Train Survey

NOR-397 1999 Oslo Contingent Valuation Noise Survey

NOR-398 1987 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

NOR-399 1990 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

NOR-400 1994 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

NOR-401 1996 Vålerenga/Gamlebyen Road Traffic Survey

CZE-402 1995-97 Czech Noise/Public Health Survey

NOR-403 1989 Horton Road Traffic Noise Survey

NOR-404 1986 Drammen Road Traffic Noise survey

NOR-405 1997 Norwegian Survey of Living Conditions

SLO-406 1989 Bratislava Medical Student Survey

SLO-407 1999 Bratislava Medical Student Survey

SPA-408 1994-95 Spanish Underground Railway Noise Survey

SPA-409 Pozuelo de Alarcón Two-Area Acoustical

Environment Survey

SPA-410 1999 Pamplona Contingent Valuation Noise Survey

SPA-411 1998 Altet-Alicante Airport Noise Survey

SWE-412 1997 Sollentuna Road/Rail Noise Survey

SWE-413 1996 Kungsbacka Railway Noise Countermeasures

Study

SWE-414 1995-96 Lund Railway Noise Barrier Survey

SWE-415 1997 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey (Before)

SWE-416 1998 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey (After,

Preliminary)

SWE-417 1999 Västre Bräckevägen Change Survey (After,

Primary)

SWE-418 1999 Stockholm Noise Barrier Traffic Survey

SWE-419 1988-93 Swedish Small Airport Noise Survey

SWE-420 1992 Gothenburg Road Traffic Survey

THA-421 1997-98 Bangkok Road Traffic Noise Survey

UKD-422 1997 English Residential Soundproofing Survey

UKD-423 1991 England/Wales Environmental Noise Survey

UKD-424 1999 Bristol Community Noise Survey

UKD-425 1990s UK Road Resurfacing Survey

UKD-426 UK Road Traffic and Ischemic Heart Disease Study

UKD-427 1996-97 Heathrow Area Children Noise Survey

USA-428 1996 Minneapolis-St Paul Aircraft Mitigation

Preference Survey

USA-429 1999 Minneapolis-St Paul Airport Noise Survey

USA-430 1994-95 Denver Airport Opening Sleep Disturbance

Study

USA-431 1995 Seattle-Tacoma Airport Noise Survey

USA-432 1997 LAX Low-Frequency Noise Survey

USA-433 1993 LAX/Castle AFB Behavioral Awakening Study

YUG-434 1994 Central Belgrade Traffic Noise Survey

USA-435 1996 Olympic Games Aircraft Noise Sleep Study

UKD-436 London/Birmingham Converted Flats Survey

SWE-437 Swedish Eight-Range Heavy Weapons Noise Survey

JPN-438 1991 Fukuoka Green Areas Noise Survey

JPN-439 1992 Fukuoka Green Areas Survey

JPN-440 1984 Fukuoka Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-441 1987 Fukuoka Railway Crossing Noise Survey

JPN-442 1987 Fukuoka 19-Area Community Noise Survey

JPN-443 1993 Fukuoka 12-Area Community Noise Survey

JPN-444 1996-97 Kadena/Futenma Military Aircraft Noise

Survey

JPN-445 1995-96 Kadena General Health Questionnaire

Survey

JPN-446 1994 Sapporo Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-447 1990 Sapporo Traffic Noise and Vibration Survey

JPN-448 1987 Sapporo Railway Noise and Vibration Survey
SERIAL NUMBER INDEX (Continued)

-96-

JPN-449 1991 Sapporo Railway Noise and Vibration Survey

JPN-450 1995-96 Kyushu Expressway Survey

JPN-451 1993 Kumamoto Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-452 1993 Tomakomai Road Traffic Noise Survey

JPN-453 1988-1990 Hokkaido/Kyushu Traffic Noise Survey

GER-454 1991 German Artillery and Road Traffic Noise

Survey

THA-455 1990-91 Bangkok Personal Noise Exposure Survey

AUL-456 1995 Sydney Airport Ku-ring-gai Noise Survey

CHI-457 1986 Beijing City (Nagoya Comparison) Survey

HUN-458 1995 Hungary Road Traffic Noise Survey

IRN-459 1977 Tehran Community Noise Survey

NET-460 1993 Dutch Artillery Range Noise Annoyance and

Startle Survey

AUL-461 1995-96 Four-Phase Sydney Road Traffic Noise

Survey

NET-462 1997 Netherlands Home Insulation Survey

GER-463 1993-94 Berlin Women Environmental Health Survey

GER-464 Oldenburg Noise Situation Investigation

GER-465 1996-97 German Sleep Disturbance Survey

GER-466 1998 Düsseldorf/Dortmund Airport Noise

Information Survey

GER-467 1997 ICE High-Speed Railway Noise Survey

NET-468 1998 Schiphol Sleep Disturbance Pilot Survey

SWI-469 1999 Swiss Noise Barrier Survey

GER-470 1996-97 German Road/Rail Traffic Noise Survey

GER-471 1995-96 Germany Rail-Grinding Noise Reduction

Study (Pilot)

GER-472 1994 1996 Düsseldorf Activity Disturbance Study

GER-473 1995 Düsseldorf Airport Noise Survey

BRA-474 1994 Porto Alegre Noise Survey

KOR-475 1980s Seoul Multiple-Source Noise Survey

OMA-476 1996-98 Oman Sound Environment Survey

POL-477 1997 Warsaw Low-Frequency Interior Noise Study

POR-478 1999 Lisbon Contingent Valuation Road Traffic

Noise Survey

GER-479 1997-98 Germany Rail-Grinding Noise Reduction

Study (Primary)

GER-480 1996-97 German Road/Rail Sleep Study

UKD-481 UK 30-Site Noise Insulation Treatment Evaluation

Survey

UKD-482 1999-2000 UK 5-Airport Night Noise Perception

Survey

UKD-483 1999 Manchester Nighttime Aircraft Noise Trial

Methodology Study

UKD-484 1992-94 Great Britain Insulation Complaint Survey

NIG-485 Nigeria Eight-City Noise Survey

NIG-486 South-Eastern Nigeria Eight-City Road Traffic

Survey

AUS-487 1998 Inn Valley Road/Railway Noise Survey

AUS-488 1998 Tyrol Children/Mothers Noise Survey

UKD-489 1999-2000 UK 4-Airport Night Noise Mail Survey

USA-490 1993-94 USA Individual Sound Noticeability Study

JPN-491 1996 Osaka International Airport Noise Survey

JPN-492 1991 Yokohama Sound Environment Survey

JPN-493 1985-86 Shinkansen/Conventional Rail Noise Survey

JPN-494 1987 Odawara Sound Environment Survey

JPN-495 1984 Nagoya Neighborhood Noise Survey

JPN-496 1994-96 Tokyo Trunk Road Noise Survey

JPN-497 1992 Itabashi Tokyo Environmental Complaints

Survey

JPN-498 1988-91 Setagaya Tokyo Environmental Complaints

Survey

JPN-499 Tokyo Four-Area Nighttime Road Traffic Survey

JPN-500 1999 Osaka Aircraft Noise and Health Survey

JPN-501 1985 Kawasaki Life-Related Noise Survey

GER-502 German Noise Change Part of CEC Sleep Study

JPN-503 1986 Tokyo Main-Road Traffic Survey

JPN-504 1987 Tokyo Side Streets Noise Survey

JPN-505 1993 Osaka Free-Response Industrial Noise Survey

JPN-506 1980s Yomahoko Community Noise Survey

JPN-507 1996 Nishijin Textile Neighborhood Noise Survey

JPN-508 Toyonaka City Free-Response Noise Survey

JPN-509 1972-81 Kyushu Airport Opening Survey

JPN-510 1980s Student Noise Attitudes Study (Japan)

GER-511 1980 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Germany)

UKD-512 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Britain)

USA-513 1985 Student Noise Attitudes Study (Boston)

CHI-514 1985 Student Noise Attitudes Study

(Beijing/Tsinghua)

JPN-515 1983 Apartment Noise Attitudes Study (Japan)

GER-516 1983 Apartment Noise Attitudes Study (Germany)

JPN-517 1990, 1995 Japanese/English Questionnaire Testing

Study (Osaka)

USA-518 1995 Japanese/English Questionnaire Testing Study

(Boston)

DEN-519 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study (Denmark)

NOR-520 Scandinavian Nine-Airport Noise Study (Norway)

AUS-521 Austrian Transportation Noise and Blood Pressure

Survey
-97-

BIBLIOGRAPHY

This section includes all works referenced in this report. As a result the bibliography does not

include general publications on noise surveys and include only a few secondary analyses of these

data.. The availability of English translations is noted. Entries are ordered by authors' last names

and, within authors, by date of publication. The survey identification number follows each entry

.

Aas,H.; Kolbenstvedt,M.; Bakketeig,L.S.; Larssen,S.; ClenchAas,J.; Solberg,S.; and Klæboe,R.: 1991. Traffic and the

Environment: A Trans-Institutional Research Programme for

Road Traffic, the Environment and Health in Urban Areas

(NTNF). pp. 1-32, Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo.

NOR-311 NOR-398 NOR-399 NOR-403 NOR-404

Aguerri Sanchez,P.; and Celma Celma,J.: 1993. Effects of Noise

on the Citizen and Its Repercussions on Municipal

Management. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 323-326,

INRETS, Arcueil, France.

SPA-320

Aircraft Nuisance Prevention Assoc.: 1973. Report on

Investigation of Living Environment Around Osaka

International Airport. Aircraft Nuisance Prevention Assoc..

JPN-163

Al-harthy,I.: 2000. The Oman Sound Environment Project

(Effect of Sound Through Sense of Humanness) (D.Eng.),

Yokohama National University.

OMA-476

Al-harthy,I.; and Tamura,A.: 1997a. Sound Environment of the

Capital of Oman. Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual

Meeting, Architectural Institute of

Japan, vol. 1, pp. 977-978.

OMA-476

Al-harthy,I.; and Tamura,A.: 1997b. Survey on Sound

Environment of the Capital of Oman. Inter-noise 97, pp.

827-830, Budapest, Hungary.

OMA-476

Al-harthy,I.; and Tamura,A.: 1997c. Survey on the Situation of

Present Environment in the Capital of Oman (Muscat).

Proceeding of International Conference on Environment 

Behavior Studies for the 21st Century, pp. 201-206.

OMA-476

Al-harthy,I.; and Tamura,A.: 1999a. Comparison of Community

Response to Sound Environment In the Different Areas of

Oman. Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting,

Architectural Institute of

Japan, vol. 1, pp. 95-96.

OMA-476

Al-harthy,I.; and Tamura,A.: 1999b. Sound Environment

Evaluation and Categorization of Audible Sounds--The First

Survey of the Human Response to the Sound Environment in

Muscat City (Oman)--. J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn.(E), 5, vol. 20, pp.

353-364.

OMA-476

Al-Samarrai,H.S.; and Al-Jawadi,M.: 1981. Traffic Noise Levels

and Annoyance in Baghdad. Inter-noise 81, pp. 537-539.

IRQ-229

Alexandre,A.: 1970. Prévision De La Gêne Due Autour Des

Aéroports Et Perspectives Sur Les Moyens D'y Remédier.

(Prediction of Annoyance Due to Noise Around Airports and

Speculations on the Means for Controlling It). Doc. A.A.

28/70. pp. 1-151.

FRA-016

Alim,O.A.; and Zaki,N.A.: 1993a. Measurements of Tramway

Noise in Alexandria. Inter-noise 93, pp. 349-354.

EGY-357

Alim,O.A.; and Zaki,N.A.: 1993b. Subjective and Objective

Assessments of Tram Noise in City Alexandria. Inter-noise

93, pp. 1153-1160.

EGY-357

Alim,O.A.; and Zaki,N.A.: 1994. Psychoacoustic Tests on

Tramway Noise. Inter-noise 94, pp. 151-156.

EGY-357

Alvord,L.S.: 1988. Annoyance Factors for Common

Neighborhood (Stationary) Noise. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 84,

pp. 780-781.

USA-308

Andersen,T.V.; Kühl,K.; and Relster,E.: 1980. Beboerreaktioner

Pa Togstøj. (People's Reactions to Railway

Noise)(Translation Available in: Reactions to Railway Noise

in Denmark. Translation LK. National Agency of

Environmental Protection, Denmark, March 1981). ÅBO 10-

12.6. pp. 261-264.

DEN-200

Andersen,T.V.; Kühl,K.; and Relster,E.: 1983. Reactions to

Railway Noise in Denmark. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 87, pp.

311-314.

DEN-200

Andersen,T.V.; Kühl,K.; and Relster,E.: 1988. Reactions to

Railway Noise in Denmark: A Correction. J.Sound Vib., vol.

120, pp. 339-340.

DEN-200
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-98-

Andrew,C.; and Sharratt,K.: 1976. Privacy Fence: A Survey of

Public Reaction to the Privacy Fence Located Along

Highway 401 Within Metro Toronto Between Victoria Park

and Warden Avenues. Ministry of Transportation and

Communications, Toronto.

CAN-279

Aoki,H.: 1959. Study of Urban Noises As Public Health

Problems, Observed From Building Interior. Reports of

Medical School of Kyoto Municipal University, 4, vol. 65,

pp. 635-679.

JPN-190

Appleyard,D.; and Carp,F.M.: 1973. The BART Residential

Impact Study: A Longitudinal Empirical Study of

Environmental Impact, in W. F. E. Preiser (ed),

Environmental Design Research, Vol. II. pp. 296-306,

Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania.

USA-066

Appleyard,D.; Gerson,S.; and Lintell,M.: 1980. Livable Streets.

U.C. Press, University of California, Berkeley, California.

USA-105

Appleyard,D.; and Lintell,M.: 1972. The Environmental Quality

of City Streets: The Residents' Viewpoint. J.Amer.Institute

of Planners, vol. 38, pp. 84-101.

USA-039

Arana,M.; and García,A.: 1989. Community Noise Survey in

Pamplona (Spain). Congress of the Federation of Acoustical

Societies of Europe, FASE 89, pp. 129-132.

SPA-315

Arana,M.; and García,A.: 1997. A Comparison Between the

Noise Surveys Carried Out in Two Spanish Cities (Valencia

and Pamplona). Inter-noise 97, pp. 819-822, Budapest,

Hungary.

SPA-315 SPA-302

Arsenio,E.; Bristow,A.; and Wardman,M.: 2000. An Innovative

Stated Preference Computer Survey Model for Valuing Noise

Impacts From 

Road Traffic. (Proceedings of Seminar F: Behavioural

Modelling). European Transport Conference 2000, pp. 67-

80, Cambridge, England.

POR-478

Arsenio,E.; Patricio,J.; Bristow,A.; Pinelo,A.; Silva,F.; and

Wardman,M.: 2000. Measuring Households' Annoyance

From Road Traffic: An Intermediate Step Within an

Innovative Noise Valuation Model. Inter-noise 2000, pp.

1626-1629, Nice, France.

POR-478

Association d'Anthropologie Appliquée: 1967. Enquête Sur Le

Bruit Autour Des Aéroports. (Investigation of the Noise

Around Airports). R-16-67. Association d'Anthropologie

Appliquée, Paris.

FRA-016

Atkins Research and Development: 1979. Subjective Effects of

Traffic Noise Exposure: Reliability, Seasonal Effects and

Correlation With Noise Indices. Atkins Research and

Development, Surrey.

UKD-157

Atkins,C.L.R.: 1983. 1982 Helicopter Disturbance Study:

Tabulations of the Responses to the Social Surveys. DR

Communication 8302. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-225

Atkins,C.L.R.; Brooker,P.; and Critchley,J.B.: 1983. 1982

Helicopter Disturbance Study: Main Report. DR Report

8304. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-225

Atkins,C.L.R.; Nurse,K.; and Richmond,C.: 1984. 1982 Aircraft

Noise Index Study: Tabulations of the Responses to the

Social Surveys. DR Communication 8312. Civil Aviation

Authority, London.

UKD-242

Atkinson,B.J.: 1983. 1982 Helicopter Disturbance Study:

Tabulations of Noise Measurement Results. DR

Communication 8303. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-225

Atkinson,B.J.; Critchley,J.B.; and Devine,E.: 1985. CEC Joint

Study of Community Response to Aircraft Noise, 1984:

Noise Measurements Near Glasgow Airport. DR

Communication 8506. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-238

Atkinson,B.J.; Critchley,J.B.; and Devine,E.: 1988. General and

Business Aviation Noise Study: Noise Exposures in the

Survey Areas. DORA Report 8711. Civil Aviation Authority,

London.

UKD-324

Aubree,D.: 1973. Enquête Acoustique Et Sociologique

Permettant De Définir Une Echelle Des La Gêne Eprouvée

Par L'Homme Dans Son Logement Du Fait Des Bruits De

Train. (Translation Available in: Acoustical and Sociological

Survey to Define a Scale of Annoyance Felt by People in

Their Homes Due to the Noise of Railroad Trains. Technical

Information Report No. 88. Bolt Beranek and Newman.

Cambridge, Massachusetts). Centre Scientifique et

Technique du Bâtiment, Paris.

FRA-063

Aubree,D.: 1975. La Gêne Due Au Bruit Des Trains.

(Annoyance Due to Train Noise). EN-SH-75.2. Centre

Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment, Nantes.

FRA-063

Aubree,D.: 1993. Regulations, Noise, and Discomfort. Noise

and Man '93: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 335-338, INRETS,

Arcueil, France.

FRA-342

Aubree,D.; Auzou,J.; and Rapin,M.: 1971. Etude De La Gêne

Due Au Trafic Automobile Urbain: Compte Rendu

Scientifique. (Study of Annoyance Due to Urban Automobile

Traffic: Scientific Report)(Translation Available in: Study of

Annoyance Due to Urban Automobile Traffic: Scientific

Report. NASA TM-77514, 1984; Study of Annoyance Due to
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-99-

Urban Automobile Traffic. Annex 4: A Catalog of the

Characteristics of Noise at Different Measuring Points.

NASA TM-77516, 1984; Study of Annoyance Due to Urban

Automobile Traffic. Annex 5: Sociological Study. NASA

TM-77515, 1984). D.G.R.S.T. No. 68-01-389. Centre

Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment, Paris.

FRA-041

Australian Government Publishing Service: 1988. Community

Response to Noise in Australia: Results of the 1986 National

Noise Survey. Australian Environmental Council Report 21.

Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra.

AUL-285

Avery,G.C.: 1982. Comparison of Telephone Complaints and

Survey Measures of Noise Annoyance. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol.

82, pp. 215-225.

AUL-214

Ághová,L.; Voleková,J.; and Jurkovicová,J.: 1990. Problematike

Hluku v Obytnom Prostredí.(Problems of Noise in Urban

Environment). Acta Hygienica Epidemiologica

Microbiologica, vol. Suppl. 3, pp. 6-8.

SLO-406

Ághová,L.; Voleková,J.; Jurkovicová,J.; and Sitár,J.: 1992.

Psychohygienické Aspekty Hlukovej Zátaze v

Urbanizovanom Prostredí. In: Psychológia v Rieení

Ekologických Problémov (Psychohygienic Aspects of Noise

Effects in an Urban Environment. In: Psychology in Solving

Ecological Problems). pp. 63-66, Institute of Experimental

psychology, of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava.

SLO-406

Åhrlin,U.: 1988. Activity Disturbances Caused by Different

Environmental Noises. J.Sound Vib., vol. 127, pp. 599-603.

SWE-035 SWE-142 SWE-228

Åhrlin,U.; and Rylander,R.: 1979. Annoyance Caused by

Different Environmental Noises. J.Sound Vib., vol. 66, pp.

459-462.

SWE-035 SWE-142 SWE-165 SWE-228

Babisch,W.; Fromme,H.; Beyer,A.; and Ising,H.: 1996. Elevated

Catecholamine Levels in Urine in Traffic Noise Exposed

Subjects. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2153-2158, Liverpool, England.

GER-463

Babisch,W.; Ising,H.; Elwood,P.C.; Sharp,D.S.; and Bainton,D.:

1993. Traffic Noise and Cardiovascular Risk: The Caerphilly

and Speedwell Studies, Second Phase. Risk Estimation,

Prevalence, and Incidence of Ischemic Heart Disease.

Arch.Environ.Health, 6, vol. 48, pp. 406-413.

UKD-426

Babisch,W.; Ising,H.; and Gallacher,J.E.J.: 2000. Association

Between Noise Annoyance and Incidence of Ischaemic Heart

Disease in the Caerphilly and Speedwell Studies. Inter-noise

2000, pp. 2065-2070, Nice, France.

UKD-426

Babisch,W.; Ising,H.; Gallacher,J.E.J.; Sweetnam,P.M.; and

Elwood,P.C.: 1998. The Caerphilly and Speedwell Studies,

10 Year Follow-Up. Noise Effects '98: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Seventh International Congress), pp. 230-

235, Sydney, Australia.

UKD-426

Babisch,W.; Ising,H.; Gallacher,J.E.J.; Sweetnam,P.M.; and

Elwood,P.C.: 1999. Traffic Noise and Cardiovascular Risk:

The Caerphilly and Speedwell Studies, Third Phase - 10

Years Follow-Up. Arch.Environ.Health, vol. 54, pp. 210-

216.

UKD-426

Bakke,P.; Wehrli,B.; Wanner,H.U.; Nemecek,J.; Turrian,V.;

and Grandjean,E.: 1977. Annoyance of Road Traffic Noise

in Dwellings. 9th International Congress on Acoustics,

Madrid, July 4-9, p. 49.

SWI-158 SWI-133

Baldwin,E.; and Fidell,S.A.: 1982. Evaluation of Noise

Exposure and Community Response Due to Temporary

Reinstitution of Night Landings at Westchester Country

Airport, Spring 1982. BBN Rep. 5083. Bolt Beranek and

Newman, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

USA-301

Barker,S.M.; and Tarnopolsky,A.: 1978. Assessing Bias in

Surveys of Symptoms Attributed to Noise. J.Sound Vib., 3,

vol. 59, pp. 349-354.

UKD-111

Barreiro,J.; Sanchez,M.; and Viladrich-Grau,M.: 2000. How

Much People Are Willing to Pay for Silence? A One and

One-Half-Bound Dc Cv Estimate. Inter-noise 2000, pp.

3408-3412, Nice, France.

SPA-410

Bartonova,A.; Clench-Aas,J.; Walker,S.E.; Tønnesen,D.A.; and

Larssen,S.: 1999. Air Quality Modelling in Assessing

Impacts of Traffic Measures in Oslo. 8th International

Symposium "Transport and Air Pollution", pp. 15-23, Graz.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Baughan,C.J.; Chinn,L.; Harris,G.J.; and Stait,R.: 2000. Rural

Residents' Response to Reductions in Traffic Noise Caused

by Resurfacing a Section of Motorway With Porous Asphalt.

Inter-noise 2000, pp. 3321-3324, Nice, France.

UKD-425

Baughan,C.J.; and Huddart,L.: 1992. Effects of Changes in

Exposure to Traffic Noise. 20th Annual PTRC Summer

meeting: Seminar B, vol. P354, pp. 115-126, PTRC

Education and Research Services Ltd., London.

UKD-325 UKD-351

Baughan,C.J.; and Huddart,L.: 1993. Effects of Traffic Noise

Changes on Residents' Nuisance Ratings. Noise and Man

'93: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth International

Congress), vol. 2, pp. 585-588, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

UKD-325 UKD-351

Belojevic,G.; and Jakovljevic,B.: 1998. Traffic Noise and Sleep

Disturbances With Regard to Age. Noise Effects '98: Noise

as a Public Health Problem (Seventh International

Congress), pp. 455-458.

YUG-434
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-100-

Belojevic,G.; Jakovljevic,B.; and Aleksic,O.: 1997. Subjective

Reactions to Traffic Noise With Regard to Some Personality

Traits. Env.Int., 2, vol. 23, pp. 221-226.

YUG-434

Belojevic,G.; Jakovljevic,B.; and Santric-Milicevic,M.: 1997.

Influence of Personality Traits on Residential Behavior in a

Noisy Urban Area. Inter-noise 97, pp. 1249-1251, Budapest,

Hungary.

YUG-434

Bendtsen,H.; and Larsen,L.E.: 2000. Noise and Nuisance From

Road Humps. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 864-867, Nice, France.

DEN-388

Bendtsen,H.; Larsen,L.E.; and Mikkelsen,B.: 2000. Perceived

Annoyance From Road Traffic Noise. Inter-noise 2000, pp.

1622-1625, Nice, France.

DEN-390

Bendtsen,H.; and Larsen,L.E.: 2001. Perception of Noise

Reduction by Noise Barriers. Euronoise 2001.

DEN-389

Berglund,B.; Berglund,U.; Jonsson,E.; and Lindvall,T.: 1977.

On the Scaling of Annoyance Due to Environmental Factors.

Environmental Psychology and Nonverbal Behavior, vol. 2,

pp. 83-92.

SWE-035

Berglund,B.; Berglund,U.; and Lindvall,T.: 1975. A Study of

Response Criteria in Populations Exposed to Aircraft Noise.

J.Sound Vib., vol. 41, pp. 33-39.

SWE-035

Berglund,B.; Berglund,U.; and Lindvall,T.: 1987. Measurement

and Control of Annoyance, in H. S. Koelega (ed),

Environmental Annoyance: Characterization, Measurement,

and Control. pp. 29-44, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

SWE-035

Berglund,B.; and Nilsson,M.E.: 2000. Total Annoyance and

Perceptually Discernible Noise Sources. Inter-noise 2000,

pp. 3541-3544, Nice, France.

SWE-418

Berlin,M.; Jonsson,E.; and Kajland,A.: 1964. Undersökning

Rörande Expositioner Av Flygbuller I Vissa Delar Av

Linköping. (Aircraft Noise Annoyance Study in Special

Areas in Linköping). National Institute of Public Health,

Stockholm.

SWE-011

Berry,B.F.: 1983. LAeq and Subjective Reaction to Different

Noise Sources: A Review of Research. Inter-noise 83, pp.

993-996.

UKD-116 UKD-071 UKD-162

Bertlin Cooper McDonald: 1977. Proposals for Noise Control

Legislation Based on a Pilot Study of Noise in Tehran.

Berlin Cooper McDonald, England.

IRN-459

Bertoni,D.; Franchini,A.; Lambert,J.; Magnoni,M.; Tartoni,P.;

and Vallet,M.: 1994. Gli Effetti Del Rumore Dei Sistemi Di

Trasporto Sulla Popolazione. (Effects on the Population of

Noise Pollution From Transport Systems). Pitagore Editrice,

Bologna, Italy.

ITL-350

Bertoni,D.; Franchini,A.; Magnoni,M.; Tartoni,P.; and

Vallet,M.: 1993. Reactions of People to Urban Traffic Noise

in Modena, Italy. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp.

593-596, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

ITL-350

Birnie,S.E.; Hall,F.L.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1980a. Community

Response to Noise From a General Aviation Airport. Noise

Control Engineering, 1, vol. 15, pp. 37-45.

CAN-168

Birnie,S.E.; Hall,F.L.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1980b. The

Contribution of Indoor and Outdoor Effects to Annoyance in

Residential Areas. Inter-noise 80, pp. 975-978.

CAN-168

Bitter,C.: 1970. La Gêne Due Au Bruit Des Avions. (Annoyance

Due to Airplane Noise)[This Same Report Appears in a

Dutch Publication by C. Bitter (1972) and in an English

Translation]. Revue D'Acoustique, 10, vol. 3, pp. 88-96.

NET-013

Bitter,C.: 1972. Geluidhinder Door Vliegtuigen. (Sound

Nuisance Due to Aircraft Noise), in C. J. Lammers, M.

Mulder, M. Schroder, J. van Straten, and R. van der Vlist

(eds.), Menswetenschappen Vandaag: Twee Zijden Van De

Medaille. pp. 251-268, Boom, Meppel.

NET-013

Bitter,C.: 1979a. Beleving Van Lawaai Van Wegverkeer En

Van Geluidwerende Voorzieningen. (Experiencing Traffic

Noise and Evaluating Noise Abatement Measures)(Also

Published Under IMG-TNO Document Number 671). Geluid

En Omgeving (Noise and the Environment), vol. 2, pp. 22-

25.

NET-106

Bitter,C.: 1979b. Perception and Experience of Traffic Noise in

a Residential District Along a State Highway (Also

Published Under IMG-TNO Document Number 682). Urban

Ecology, vol. 4, pp. 161-177.

NET-106

Bitter,C.: 1980. Beleving Van Geluidwerende Voorzieningen

Tegen Vliegtuiglawaai in De Woonsituatie - De Enquête

Vóór Net Aanbrengen Van De Geluidwerende

Voorzieningen. Band 1: Tekstgedeelte, and Band 2 Tabellen.

(Experience of Noise Abatement Measures Against Aircraft

Noise on Residences - The Survey Before the Noise

Abatement Measures. Part 1: Text, Part 2: Tables)[Also

Published by Ministerie Van Volksgezondheid En

Milieuhygiëne As Interdepartementale Commissie

Geluidhinder Reports ICG-LL-HR-14-01; ICG-LL-HR-14-

02]. Report D44. IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-115 NET-149

Bitter,C.; Holst,J.H.K.; and Kandelaar,H.A.C.: 1982. Beleving

Geluidwerende Voorzieningen in De Woonsituatie Langs
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-101-

Rijksweg 10 in Amsterdam. (Effects of Noise Abatement

Measures on Residences Alongside Highway 10 at

Amsterdam). ICG-VL-DR-14-02. Ministerie van

Volksgezondheid en Milieuhygiëne, Leidschendam.

NET-258

Bitter,C.; and Horch,C.: 1958. Geluidhinder En Geluidisolatie

in De Woningbouw II: Sociaal-Psychologische Aspecten Van

De Geluidhinder. (Sound Nuisance and Sound Insulation in

Blocks of Dwellings II: Social-Psychological Aspects of

Sound Nuisance). Report No. 25. Research Institute for

Public Health Engineering, TNO, Delft.

NET-002

Bitter,C.; Kaper,J.P.; and Pinkse,W.A.H.: 1978. Beleving

Geluidwerende Voorzieningen in De Woonsituatie Langs

Rijksweg 16 in Dordrecht. (Effects of Noise Abatement

Measures on Residences Alongside Highway 16 at

Dordrecht)[Available in an English Translation With the

Same Report Number]. Report VL-DR-14-01.

Interdepartementale Commissie Geluidhinder,

Leidschendam, Netherlands.

NET-106

Bitter,C.; and Schwager,K.W.: 1964. Enquete Reacties

Bevolking Op Vliegtuiglawaai. (6 Parts)(The Translation Is

Most Useful When Used in Conjunction With the Full Dutch

Report Because It Translates Only Limited Sections and

Representative Table Headings: Survey Population Response

to Airplane Noise. NASA TM-75790). Institute for

Environmental Hygiene, TNO, Delft.

NET-013

Bitter,C.; and van Weeren,P.: 1955. Geluidshinder En

Geluidsisolatie in De Woningbouw I: Geluidsisolatie

Vereisten Voor Geluidshinder in De Woonsituatie (Sound

Nuisance and Sound Insulation in Blocks of Dwellings I:

Sound Insulation Measurements, Considered in Connection

With the Opinions of House Occupants Regarding Noise

Nuisance)[This Report Is Available in an English

Publication Under the Same Number.]. Report No. 24.

Institute for Public Health Engineering, TNO, Delft.

NET-002

Bitter,C.; and Willigers,L.H.J.: 1979. Beleving Van

Geluidwerende Voorzieningen Tegen Vliegtuiglawaai in De

Woonsituatie - Een Vergelijkende Studie (Experience of

Noise Abatement Measures Against Aircraft Noise on

Residences - A Comparative Study). Report D42. IMG-TNO,

Delft.

NET-115 NET-149

Björkman,M.: 1991. Community Noise Annoyance: Importance

of Noise Levels and the Number of Noise Events. J.Sound

Vib., vol. 151, pp. 497-503.

SWE-359

Björkman,M.; Levein,B.; Rylander,R.; and Öhrström,E.: 1988.

Effekter Av Trafikbuller På Befolkningen Vid Bräkeleden I

Göteborg (Effects of Road Traffic Noise on People Living

Near Bräckeleden in Gothenburg). Rapport 8/88.

Department of Environmental Hygiene, University of

Gothenburg, Gothenburg.

SWE-303

Björkman,M.; and Rylander,R.: 1990. Community Noise - the

Importance of Noise Levels and Number of Noise Events.

Inter-noise 90, pp. 271-274.

SWE-359

Björkman,M.; Sato,T.; Yano,T.; and Rylander,R.: 1998. Road

Traffic Noise Annoyance in Relation to the Individual Noise

Dose. Noise Effects ‘98: Noise as a Public Health Problem

(Seventh International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 539-542.

SWE-368

Bluhm,G.; and Nordling,E.: 2000. Traffic Noise and

Annoyance. Inter-noise 2000, Nice, France.

SWE-412

Bluhm,G.; Rosenlund,M.; and Berglind,N.: 1998. Traffic Noise

and Health Effects. Noise Effects '98: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Seventh International Congress), pp. 247-

250.

SWE-412

Bolstad Engineering Associates,I.: 1973. Edmonton Noise

Survey. Bolstad Engineering Associates, Inc., Edmonton,

Canada.

CAN-077

Bolt Beranek and Newman: 1967. Literature Search for the FHA

Contract on Urban Noise. BBN Rep. 1460. Bolt Beranek and

Newman, Canoga Park, California.

USA-020

Bolt Beranek and Newman: 1971a. Community Noise

Measurements in Los Angeles, Detroit and Boston. BBN

Rep. 2078. Bolt Beranek and Newman, Canoga Park,

California.

USA-057

Bolt Beranek and Newman: 1971b. Motor Vehicle Noise:

Identification and Analysis of Situations Contributing To

Annoyance. BBN Rep. 2082. Bolt Beranek and Newman,

Canoga Park, California.

USA-057

Borsky,P.N.: 1954. Community Aspects of Aircraft Annoyance.

NORC Report no. 54. National Opinion Research Center,

Chicago.

USA-004

Borsky,P.N.: 1961a. Community Reactions to Air Force Noise:

Part I. Basic Concepts and Preliminary Methodology. Wadd

Tech. Rep. 60-689 (I). Biomedical Laboratory, WrightPatterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

USA-004 USA-006

Borsky,P.N.: 1961b. Community Reactions to Air Force Noise:

Part II. Data on Community Studies and Their

Interpretation. Wadd Tech. Rep. 60-689 (II). Biomedical

Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.

USA-006

Borsky,P.N.: 1962. Community Reactions to Sonic Booms.

NASA CR-57022.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-102-

USA-007

Borsky,P.N.: 1965. Community Reactions to Sonic Booms in the

Oklahoma City Area. NORC Report no. 101. AMRL Report

no. AMRL-TR 65-37. AMRL, Wright Patterson Air Force

Base.

USA-012

Borsky,P.N.: 1974a. Annoyance and Acceptability Judgements

of Noise Produced by Three Types of Aircraft by Residents

Living Near J.F.K. Airport. NASA CR-142108.

USA-084

Borsky,P.N.: 1974b. Evaluation of the Effects of One Year's

Operation of the Dynamic Preferential Runway System.

NASA CR-140488.

USA-059

Borsky,P.N.: 1975. Special Analysis of Community Annoyance

With Aircraft Noise Reported by Residents in the Vicinity of

J.F.K. Airport-1972. NASA CR-132678.

USA-059

Borsky,P.N.: 1976a. New Insights into Community Annoyance

With Aircraft Noise. NOISEXPO '76, New York, March 29-

31, pp. 30-46, Acoustical Publications, Ohio.

USA-059

Borsky,P.N.: 1976b. Sleep Interference and Annoyance by

Aircraft Noise. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 10, pp. 18-21.

USA-059

Borsky,P.N.: 1977. A Comparison of a Laboratory and Field

Study of Annoyance and Acceptability of Aircraft Noise

Exposures. NASA CR-2772.

USA-110

Borsky,P.N.: 1978. Community Annoyance Before and After

Concorde Operation at J.F.K. Airport. Noise Research Unit,

Columbia Univ., New York.

USA-143

Borsky,P.N.: 1983. Integration of Multiple Aircraft Noise

Exposures Over Time by Residents Living Near U.S. Air

Force Bases. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fourth

International Congress), pp. 1049-1060, Centro Ricerche e

Studi Amplifon, Milano, Italy.

USA-338

Borsky,P.N.; and Leonard,S.: 1973. Annoyance Judgements of

Aircraft With and Without Acoustically Treated Nacelles.

NASA CR-2261. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-059

Botteldooren,D.; Verkeyn,A.; and Lercher,P.: 2000a. Extracting

Linguistic Rules to Model Community Traffic Noise

Annoyance. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 4, pp. 2302-2307, Nice,

France.

AUS-487

Botteldooren,D.; Verkeyn,A.; and Lercher,P.: 2000b. What Can

Classical and Fuzzy Concepts Contribute to the Analysis of

Masking Effects in Environmental Noise Surveys? NoiseCon 2000, vol. 4.

AUS-487

Bottom,C.G.: 1971a. A Social Survey Into Annoyance Caused

by the Interaction of Aircraft Noise and Traffic Noise (M.Sc.

Thesis), Loughborough Univ. of Tech., England.

UKD-033

Bottom,C.G.: 1971b. A Social Survey Into Annoyance Caused

by the Interaction of Aircraft Noise and Traffic Noise.

J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 19, pp. 473-476.

UKD-033

Bottom,C.G.; and Waters,D.M.: 1971. A Social Survey into

Annoyance Caused by the Interaction of Aircraft Noise and

Traffic Noise. [This Report Was Superseded by a Later

Report, Bottom and Waters, 1972]. TT-7102. Loughborough

Univ. of Tech., England.

UKD-033

Bottom,C.G.; and Waters,D.M.: 1972. A Survey Into the

Annoyance Caused by Aircraft Noise and Road Traffic

Noise. TT-7204. Loughborough Univ. of Tech., England.

UKD-033

Bouchard,T.J.: 1970. An Interview Study of Traffic Noise

Annoyance. Research Project No. 00-122. Minnesota

Department of Highways, Minnesota Dept. of

Transportation.

USA-047

Bradley,J.S.: 1976. A Second Generation Noise Survey. Internoise 76, pp. 377-380.

CAN-120

Bradley,J.S.: 1979. Predictors of Adverse Human Responses to

Traffic Noise. ASTM Special Technical Publication 692.

American Society For Testing and Materials, Philadelphia.

CAN-120

Bradley,J.S.: 1980. Field Study of Adverse Effects of Traffic

Noise. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Third International

Congress), ASHA Report 10, pp. 571-579, American

Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville,

Maryland.

CAN-120

Bradley,J.S.: 1982. Subjective Rating of Sound Insulation of

Party Walls. Building Research Note No. 196. Division of

Building Research, National Research Council, Canada.

CAN-262

Bradley,J.S.: 1983a. A Subjective Study of Party Wall Sound

Insulation. Inter-noise 83, pp. 563-566.

CAN-262

Bradley,J.S.: 1983b. Subjective Rating of Party Walls. Canadian

Acoustics, 4, vol. 11, pp. 37-45.

CAN-262

Bradley,J.S.: 1991. Survey of Outdoor Air Conditioner Noise.

Report No. CR-5954.2. National Research Council Canada,

Ottawa.

CAN-322

Bradley,J.S.: 1993. Disturbance Caused by Residential Air

Conditioner Noise. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 93, pp. 1978-

1986.

CAN-322

Bradley,J.S.; and Jonah,B.A.: 1977. A Field Study of Human
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-103-

Response to Traffic Noise. SV-77-2. Faculty of Engineering

Science, Univ. of Western Ontario.

CAN-120

Bradley,J.S.; and Jonah,B.A.: 1979a. The Effects of Site

Selected Variables on Human Responses to Traffic Noise,

Part I: Type of Housing by Traffic Noise Level. J.Sound

Vib., 4, vol. 66, pp. 589-604.

CAN-120

Bradley,J.S.; and Jonah,B.A.: 1979b. The Effects of Site

Selected Variables on Human Responses to Traffic Noise,

Part II: Road Type by Socio-Economic Status by Traffic

Noise Level. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 67, pp. 395-407.

CAN-120

Bradley,J.S.; and Jonah,B.A.: 1979c. The Effects of Site

Selected Variables on Human Responses to Traffic Noise,

Part III: Community Size by Socio-Economic Status by

Traffic Noise Level. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 67, pp. 409-423.

CAN-120

Bragdon,C.R.: 1969. Community Noise and the Public Interest.

Sound and Vibration, vol. December 1969, pp. 16-21.

USA-058

Bragdon,C.R.: 1971. Noise Pollution: The Unquiet Crisis. Univ.

of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

USA-058

Bray,V.: 1996. Opening of New Runway at Kingsford Smith

Airport, Sydney, Australia - Acoustic Impact. Inter-noise 96,

pp. 2457-2460, Liverpool.

AUL-456

Bremner,R.M.: 1973. Noise Control Study; Volume I: Summary

and Policy Report; Volume II: Technical Discussion. Report

to Committee on Public Works. Toronto Noise Control

Steering Committee, Toronto.

CAN-079

Bremond,J.: 1971. Enquete D'Opinion Effectuée a L'Occasion

Des Vols Experimentaux De Concorde Des 11, 13 Et 14,

Mai 1971. (Translation Available in: A Study of the Effects

on Public Opinion of Experimental Concorde Flights on May

11, 13, and 14, 1971). Centre d'Etudes et des Recherches

Psychologiques Air, Saint-Cyr-L'Ecole.

FRA-189

Bremond,J.: 1974. Reaction Des Populations Françaises Au

Bang Supersonic (Translation Available in: Reaction of the

French Population to the Supersonic Bang. NASA-TM75487). Revue De Médecine Aéronautique Et Spatiale, 3rd.

Qtr., vol. 13, pp. 208-213.

FRA-045

Bremond,J.: 1979a. Evaluation De La Gêne Due Au Bruit De

Concorde Autour De L'Aéroport International De

Washington-Dulles. Médecine Aéronautique Et Spatiale,

Médecine Subaquatique Et Hyperbare, 72, vol. 18, pp. 276-

280.

USA-127

Bremond,J.: 1979b. La Gêne Causée Par L'Aviation Légère.

(Annoyance From Light Aircraft). Médecine Aéronautique

Et Spatiale, Médecine Subaquatique Et Hyperbare, 72, vol.

18, pp. 297-302.

FRA-146

Broderson,A.B.; and Edwards,R.G.: 1976. Environmental Noise

Impact of Army Helicopters. J.Environmental Sci., vol. 19,

pp. 9-18.

USA-096

Broderson,A.B.; Edwards,R.G.; and Hauser,W.P.: 1979.

Environmental Noise in Kentucky: A Comprehensive Study

of Noise and Citizen Attitudes in Twenty Kentucky Cities

and of the Economic Impact of Regulation on Three

Kentucky Industries. Watkins and Assoc., Inc., Lexington,

Kentucky.

USA-172

Broderson,A.B.; Edwards,R.G.; McCoy,D.F.; and Coakley,W.S.:

1981. Proposed State Noise Regulations-An Urban Attitude

Survey. Sound and Vibration, 12, vol. 15, pp. 8-13.

USA-172

Brooker,P.: 1982. Reaction to Aircraft Noise Near General

Aviation Airfields: An Examination of Critiques of the

DORA Study. DORA Report 8213. Civil Aviation Authority,

London.

UKD-243

Brooker,P.: 1983. Public Reaction to Aircraft Noise: Recent

U.K. Studies. Inter-noise 83, pp. 951-955.

UKD-242

Brooker,P.; Critchley,J.B.; Monkman,D.J.; and Richmond,C.:

1985. United Kingdom Aircraft Noise Index Study: Main

Report. DR Report 8402. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-242

Brooker,P.; and Davies,L.I.C.: 1983. Reaction to Aircraft Noise

Near General Aviation Airfields. Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Fourth International Congress), pp. 1139-1143,

Centro Ricerche e Studi Amplifon, Milano, Italy.

UKD-243

Brooker,P.; and Davies,L.I.C.: 1984. Reaction to Aircraft Noise

Near General Aviation Airfields. Noise and Vibration

Control Worldwide, vol. June 1984, pp. 147-149.

UKD-243

Brooker,P.; and Nurse,K.: 1983. 1982 Manchester Night Noise

Study: Main Report. DR Report 8308. Directorate of

Research, Chief Scientist's Division, Civil Aviation

Authority, London.

UKD-224

Brooker,P.; and Richmond,C.: 1985a. The United Kingdom

Aircraft Noise Index Study: Part I -- Main Results. Institute

of Acoustics, April 1985 (York), pp. 323-329.

UKD-242

Brooker,P.; and Richmond,C.: 1985b. The United Kingdom

Aircraft Noise Index Study: Part II -- Statistical Analysis of

Disturbance and Noise Exposure. Institute of Acoustics,

April 1985 (York), pp. 331-338.

UKD-242

Brown,A.L.: 1978. Traffic Noise Annoyance Along Urban
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-104-

Roadways: Report on a Survey in Brisbane, Sydney and

Melbourne. ARRB Internal Report AIR 206-6. Australian

Road Research Board, Victoria, Australia.

AUL-227

Brown,A.L.: 1980a. Measuring Dose-Response Relationships

For Environmental Factors, in J. Morris (ed), Measuring

Social Behavior in Road Research. pp. 109-119, Australian

Road Research Board, Australia.

AUL-227

Brown,A.L.: 1980b. The Noise-Response Relationship Near a

Freeway. ARRB Proceedings, 5, vol. 10, pp. 44-153.

AUL-226

Brown,A.L.: 1987. Responses to an Increase in Road Traffic

Noise. J.Sound Vib., vol. 117, pp. 69-79.

AUL-265

Brown,A.L.; Hall,A.; and Kyle-Little,J.: 1985. Response to a

Reduction in Traffic Noise Exposure. J.Sound Vib., vol. 98,

pp. 235-246.

AUL-264

Brown,A.L.; and Law,H.G.: 1976. Effects of Traffic Noise:

South-East Freeway, Brisbane. ARRB Proceedings, vol. 8,

pp. 8-30, Victoria, Australia.

AUL-226

Brown,A.L.; and Law,H.G.: 1978. South-East Freeway

(Brisbane) Noise Annoyance Study: Report on the Survey.

ARRB Report No. 82. Australian Road Research Board,

Victoria, Australia.

AUL-226

Bruckmayer,F.; and Lang,J.: 1967. Störung Der Bevölkerung

Durch Verkehrslärm. (Annoyance of People by Traffic

Noise)(Translation Available in: Disturbance of the Populace

by Traffic Noise. NASA TM-77723). Österreichische

Ingenieur-Zeitschrift, 8, 9, 10, vol. 10, pp. 302-306.

AUS-014

Buchta,E.: 1984. Annoyance Caused by Shooting Noise and

Road Traffic Noise in a Field-Study and a Laboratory Test.

Fourth Congress of the Federation of Acoustical Societies of

Europe, pp. 449-454.

GER-278

Buchta,E.: 1988. Annoyance of Residents Through Low

Frequency (Artillery) and High Frequency (Small Arms)

Impulse Noise. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth

International Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour,

Animal, Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp.

171-174, Swedish Council for Building Research,

Stockholm.

GER-278 GER-290

Buchta,E.: 1990. A Field Survey on Annoyance Caused by

Sounds From Small Firearms. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 88, pp.

1459-1467.

GER-278

Buchta,E.; Buchta,C.; Koslowsky,L.; and Rohland,P.: 1982.

Lästigkeit Von Schießlärm. (Annoyance Caused by Shooting

Noise). Forschungsbericht FE 82-105 01 314.

Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.

GER-278

Buchta,E.; Buchta,C.; and Loosen,W.: 1986. Lärmbelästigung

in Der Umgebung Von Truppenübungsplätzen. (Noise

Annoyance in the Vicinity of Military Training

Areas)(Translation Available in: Noise Stress in the Vicinity

of Military Training Areas. 1989. NASA-TT-20741).

Forschungsbericht 86 - 10501 314 / 02. Umweltbundesamt,

Berlin.

GER-290

Buchta,E.; and Kastka,J.: 1977a. Belästigung Durch

Autobahnlärm. (Nuisance by Highway Traffic). 9th

International Congress on Acoustics, p. 33.

GER-164

Buchta,E.; and Kastka,J.: 1977b. Relation Between the

Annoyance of Traffic Noise and Physical Noise Level Data.

Inter-noise 77, p. B731-B737.

GER-164

Buchta,E.; and Vos,J.: 1998. A Field Survey on the Annoyance

Caused by Sounds From Large Firearms and Road Traffic.

J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 5, vol. 104, pp. 2890-2902.

GER-454

Buchta,E.; and Vos,J.: 1999. Response to "Comments on 'A

Field Survey on the Annoyance Caused by Sounds From

Large Firearms and Road Traffic'"[J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106,

1594-1597 (1999)]. Journal of the Acoustical Society of

America, 3, vol. 106, pp. 1598-1601.

JPN-454

Bugge,J.J.: 1994. Community Response to Noise From Short

Term Military Aircraft Exercises at Airports Serving Both

Civil and Military Traffic. Inter-noise 94, pp. 243-246,

Yokohama, Japan.

NOR-328 NOR-366

Bugge,J.J.; Gjestland,T.; Liasjø,K.H.; and Granøien,I.L.N.:

1991. Preliminary Results From a Study of Community

Response to Noise From Military Aircraft Exercise. Internoise 91, pp. 203-206.

NOR-366

Bullen,R.B.; and Hede,A.J.: 1982. Assessment of Community

Noise Exposure From Rifle Shooting. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol.

82, pp. 29-37.

AUL-209

Bullen,R.B.; and Hede,A.J.: 1983a. Reliability and Validity of

Reaction Variables in Community Noise Research. Noise as

a Public Health Problem (Fourth International Congress), pp.

1105-1115, Centro Ricerche e Studi Amplifon, Milano, Italy.

AUL-209 AUL-210

Bullen,R.B.; and Hede,A.J.: 1983b. Time of Day Corrections in

Measures of Aircraft Noise Exposure. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 5,

vol. 73, pp. 1624-1630.

AUL-210

Bullen,R.B.; and Hede,A.J.: 1986. Comparison of the

Effectiveness of Measures of Aircraft Noise Exposure by

Using Social Survey Data. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 108, pp.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-105-

227-245.

AUL-210

Bullen,R.B.; Hede,A.J.; and Job,R.F.S.: 1991. Community

Reaction to Noise From an Artillery Range. Noise Control

Engineering, vol. 37, pp. 115-128.

AUL-321

Bullen,R.B.; Hede,A.J.; and Kyriacos,E.: 1986. Reaction to

Aircraft Noise in Residential Areas Around Australian

Airports. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 108, pp. 199-225.

AUL-210

Bullen,R.B.; and Job,R.F.S.: 1985. Re-Analysis of Data

Presented in "Community Response to Blasting" by Fidell,

Et Al. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 78, pp. 799-800.

USA-206

Burgess,M.; and Zehner,R.: 1993. Aircraft Noise Amelioration

Study. Unisearch Ltd., Canberra, Australia.

AUL-384

Burgess,M.; and Zehner,R.: 1994a. Aircraft Noise Amelioration

Schemes--Attitudes of Residents to the Options. Inter-noise

94, pp. 239-242, Yokohama, Japan.

AUL-384

Burgess,M.; and Zehner,R.: 1994b. Attitudes of Residents

Exposed to Aircraft Noise to Amelioration Measures. NATO

CCMS Symposium on Aircraft Noise Abatement Receiver

Technology, Baltimore.

AUL-384

Burrows,A.A.; and Zamarin,D.M.: 1972. Aircraft Noise and the

Community: Some Recent Survey Findings. Aerospace

Medicine, 1, vol. 43, pp. 27-33.

USA-031

Canada Ministry of Transport: 1972. Community Reaction to

Airport Noise-Dorval. Perspectives- Jeunesse, Vol. 1 and 2.

Project No. 267-4589. Canada Ministry of Transport,

Montreal.

CAN-055

Carp,F.M.; and Carp,A.: 1982a. A Role for Technical

Environmental Assessment in Perceptions of Environmental

Quality and Well-Being. J.Env.Psych., vol. 2, pp. 171-191.

USA-066

Carp,F.M.; and Carp,A.: 1982b. Perceived Environmental

Quality of Neighborhoods: Development of Assessment

Scales and Their Relation to Age and Gender. J.Env.Psych.,

vol. 2, pp. 295-312.

USA-066

Carp,F.M.; and Carp,A.: 1982c. The Ideal Residential Area.

Research on Aging, vol. 4, pp. 411-439.

USA-066

Carp,F.M.; Zawadski,R.T.; and Shokron,H.: 1976. Dimensions

of Urban Environmental Quality. Environment and

Behavior, vol. 8, pp. 239-264.

USA-066

Carter,N.L.; Job,R.F.S.; Taylor,R.; Peploe,P.; and Morell,S.:

1996. Progress Report on Sydney Airport Health Studies,

Phase 1. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2165-2170, Liverpool, England.

AUL-383

Cederlöf,R.; Jonsson,E.; and Sörensen,S.: 1967. On the

Influence of Attitudes Toward the Source on Annoyance

Reactions to Noise: A Field Experiment. Nordisk Hygienisk

Tidskrift, vol. 48, pp. 46-55.

SWE-011

Centre d'Etudes et Recherches Psychologiques Air: 1971.

Attitudes De La Population Française a L'Egard Du Bang

Supersonique. (Attitude of the People of France Towards the

Supersonic Bang)(Translation Available in: Attitudes of the

People of France Towards the Supersonic Bang. NASA TM76581). Centre d'Etudes et Recherches Psychologiques Air,

St. Cyr L'Ecole.

FRA-045

Centre d'Etudes et Recherches Psychologiques Air: 1978. La

Gêne Causée Par L'Aviation Légère Enquête Effectuée

Autour De Quatre Aérodromes De La Région Parisienne.

(Translation Available in: Annoyance From Light Aircraft:

Investigation Carried Out Around Four Airports Near Paris.

NASA-TM-75823. Nuisance Caused by Light Aviation:

Enquiry Conducted Around Four Aérodromes of The

Parisian District: Appendix to the Main Report. NASA-TM76532). Centre d'Etudes et Recherches Psychologiques Air,

St.-Cyr-L'Ecole; and ARC, Paris.

FRA-146

Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment: 1968. La Gêne

Causée Par Le Bruit Autour Des Aéroports: Rapport De Fin

D'Etude. (Translation Available in: The Annoyance Caused

by Noise Around Airports: Final Report. NASA TM-75784).

Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment, Paris.

FRA-016

CH2M Hill: 1980. Bradley International Airport Noise

Abatement Plan. CH2M Hill, Newport Beach, California.

USA-186

Chanaud,R.C.: 1972. Noise in Boulder, Colorado 1972.

Engineering Dynamics, Inc., Littleton, Colorado.

USA-067 USA-081

Chang,C.L.: 1981. Vehicles Noise Criteria As a Noise Control

Procedure. Inter-noise 81, pp. 845-848.

CHI-230

Chapman,D.: 1948. A Survey of Noise in British Homes.

National Building Studies, Tech Paper No. 2. HMSO,

London.

UKD-001

Claassen,A.W.M.; Katteler,H.A.; Steenbekkers,J.H.M.; and de

Jong,R.G.: 1999. Evaluatie Milieueffecten Betuweroute

1998: Beleving Van De Woonomgeving En Van Geluid.,

Deel 1: Pilot-Studie Havenspoorlijn (Evaluation of

Environmental Effects Betuweroute 1988 : Experience of the

Living Environment and Noise, Part 1 Pilot-Study

Havenspoorlijn). ITS/TNOPG: NS Railinfrabeheer, Utrecht.

NET-378

Clary,B.B.: 1974. The Political and Social Impact of Aircraft

Noise on Four Urban Communities (Ph.D. Dissertation),
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-106-

University of Southern California.

USA-245 USA-310

Clench-Aas,J.; Bartonova,A.; Klæboe,R.; and Kolbenstvedt,M.:

1999. Quantifying Effect of Traffic Measures Using

Individual Exposure Modeling. 8th International Symposium

"Transport and Air Pollution", pp. 581-590, Graz.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Clench-Aas,J.; Bartonova,A.; Klæboe,R.; and Kolbenstvedt,M.:

2000. Oslo Traffic Study Part 2: Quantifying Effects of

Traffic Measures Using Individual Exposure Modeling.

Atmospheric Environment, 27, vol. 34, pp. 4737-4744.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Committee on Community Reactions to Concorde: 1977.

Community Reactions to Concorde: An Assessment of the

Trial Period at Dulles Airport. National Research Council,

National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.

USA-127

Connor,W.K.: 1968. Community Reactions to Aircraft Noise:

Noise Measurements. NASA -SP-189. pp. 649-659, NASA,

Washington, D.C.

USA-022

Connor,W.K.; and Patterson,H.P.: 1972. Community Reaction

to Aircraft Noise Around Smaller City Airports. NASA CR2104. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-022 USA-032 USA-044

Connor,W.K.; and Patterson,H.P.: 1976. Analysis of the Effects

of Numbers of Aircraft Operations on Community

Annoyance. NASA CR-2741. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-022 USA-032 USA-044

Cooper,P.J.; Diamond,I.D.; Rice,C.G.; and Walker,J.G.: 1984a.

The Modeling of Source Specific and Total Noise

Annoyance Using Source Specific Noise Measurements.

Institute of Acoustics, 1984, pp. 301-308.

UKD-241

Cops,A.; Myncke,H.; Gambart,R.; and Steenackers,P.: 1978.

Traffic Noise Measurements and Their Relation With

Annoyance. Inter-noise 78, pp. 605-608.

BEL-122

Dankittikul,W.; Izumi,K.; Yano,T.; Kurosawa,K.; and

Yamashita,T.: 1993. Cross-Cultural Comparison of

Community Response to Road Traffic Noise in Japan and

Thailand. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 197-200,

INRETS, Arcueil, France.

JPN-326 THA-327

Davies,L.I.C.; Brooker,P.; and Critchley,J.B.: 1987. Noise

Disturbance at Night Near Heathrow and Gatwick Airports:

Critique of the Technical Issues Raised by Consultees

During the 1986 Public Consultation. DORA Report 8715.

Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-182

Dawson,R.F.F.: 1973. Environmental Effects of Alton By-Pass.

TRRL Report LR 589. Transport and Road Research

Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.

UKD-266

Daz,E.G.; Quiros,P.S.; Ibñez,F.B.; Belenguer,H.E.; Pérez,A.G.;

and Sanchis,A.M.: 1987. El Nivel Continuo Equivalente

Como Indice De Molestia. Revista De Acústica, vol. 18, pp.

5-16.

SPA-316

de Brisson: 1966. Etude D'Opinion Sur Le Bang Supersonique.

(Translation Available in: Opinion Study on the Sonic Bang.

Royal Aircraft Establishment Library Translation No. 1159,

Farnborough, Hampshire, Great Britain). Study no. 22.

Centre d'Etudes et d'Instruction Psychologiques de l'Armée

de l'Air, Saint-Cyr-L'Ecole.

FRA-017

De Jong,R.G.; Groeneveld,Y.; and Halkes,H.J.C.: 1990.

Geluidneveaus InNederland (Noise Annoyance in the

Netherlands). NIPG - 90.0605. TNO, Delft.

NET-356

de Jong,R.G.: 1977a. Rail Traffic: A Preliminary Study on

Attitudes to Rail Traffic. Report ICB-RL-WR-03.

Netherlands. [English version of a report].

NET-194

de Jong,R.G.: 1977b. Railverkeer - Orienterend Onderzoek Met

Betrekking Tot Belevingsaspecten Van Railverkeer. (Rail

Traffic - Pilot Study to Aspects of Experience of Rail

Traffic). Report D 37. IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-194

de Jong,R.G.: 1979a. A Dutch Study on Railway Traffic Noise.

J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 66, pp. 497-502.

NET-153

de Jong,R.G.: 1980b. Incidents of Annoyance and Complaints

Induced by Various Noise Sources. 10th International

Congress on Acoustics, pp. C2-15.1.

NET-261

de Jong,R.G.: 1980a. Noise Annoyance in the Vicinity of

Military Airbases. 10th International Congress on Acoustics,

pp. C2-5.3.

NET-193

de Jong,R.G.: 1981a. Beleving Van Geluidwerende

Voorzieningen Langs Rijksweg 10 (Evaluation of Noise

Abatement Measures Alongside Highway 10). Geluid En

Omgeving (Noise and the Environment), 1, vol. 4, pp. 16-

18.

NET-258

de Jong,R.G.: 1981b. Community Response Surveys and the

Dutch Noise Abatement. Inter-noise 81, pp. 787-792.

NET-261

de Jong,R.G.: 1981d. Nederlands Onderzoek Naar Geluidhinder

Door Vliegtuigen - Een Overzicht. (Research on Noise

Annoyance by Planes in the Nederlands - an Overview)(An

English Translation of This Paper Is Available As: Some

Highlights From the Dutch Aircraft Noise Studies. IMGTNO Document Number 765). Geluid En Omgeving (Noise

and the Environment), vol. 3, pp. 228-232.

NET-013 NET-115 NET-149 NET-193
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-107-

de Jong,R.G.: 1981f. Some Major Findings From Dutch Studies

on Aircraft Noise Annoyance. Inter-noise 81, pp. 793-796.

NET-013 NET-115 NET-149 NET-193 NET-258

de Jong,R.G.: 1983a. De Bruikbaarheid Van Kosten-Eenheid En

Bitter-Index Voor Het Bepalen Van Dosis-Effectrelaties Bij

Militaire Luchtvaart. (The Utility of the Kosten-Unit and

Bitter-Index in Assessing Dose-Response Relations for

Military Aircraft)(Translation Available in: Applicability of

Kosten Unit and Bitter Index to Determine Dose Effect

Relationships in Military Aeronautics. 1989. NASA-TT20494). TNO Report D-72. Delft.

NET-013 NET-115 NET-193

de Jong,R.G.: 1983b. Some Developments in Community

Response Research Since the Second International

Workshop on Railway and Tracked Transit System Noise in

1978. J.Sound Vib., vol. 87, pp. 297-309.

NET-106 NET-153 NET-195

de Jong,R.G.: 1986a. Annoyance by Low-Flying Aircraft.

NATO CCMS (Committee on the Challenges of Modern

Society) Conference in Mittenwald, Federal Republic of

Germany, September 22-26.

NET-269

de Jong,R.G.: 1986b. Geluidhinder Onder Laagvliegroutes in

Overijssel. (Noise Annoyance Under Low Flight Routes in

Overijssel)(Translation Available in: Noise Annoyance

Under Low Flight Routes in Overijssel. 1989. NASA TM20489). TNO report 86024. NIPG-TNO, Leiden.

NET-269

de Jong,R.G.: 1988a. Inventarisatie Van Geluidhinder in

Nederland: 10 Jaar Later. (Inventory of Noise Annoyance in

the Netherlands: 10 Years Later). Report No. 88050. NIPGTNO, Leiden.

NET-356

de Jong,R.G.: 1988b. Inventarisatie Van Geluidhinder in

Nederland: Rangordening Van Toestellen Naar

Hinderlijkheid. (Inventory of Noise Annoyance in the

Netherlands: Rank Ordering of Annoyance With Machinery

in or Around the Home). Report No. 88049. NIPG-TNO,

Leiden.

NET-356

de Jong,R.G.; and Beers,C.S.: 1980c. Geluidhinder Rond

Militaire Vliegvelden. (Noise Annoyance Around Military

Airfields)(Part 1: Text, Part 2: Appendix)[Also Published by

Ministerie Van Volksgezondheid En Milieuhygiëne As

Interdepartementale Commissie Geluidhinder Reports ICGLL-HR-16-01; ICG-LL-HR-16-02][Translation Available in:

Noise Annoyance Around Military Airports. FTD-ID(RS)T0998-89. Foreign Technology Division, Air Force Systems

Command. June 1990. Translation Available in: Noise

Annoyance Around Military Airfields: Volume 2:

Appendices. FTD-ID(RS)T-1030-89. Foreign Technology

Division, Air Force Systems Command. 1990. Questionnaire

Translated As: Survey DA 5729: Netherlands Foundation for

Statistics. FTD-ID(RS)T-1029-89. Foreign Technology

Division, Air Force Systems Command. March 1990].

Report D 51. IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-193

de Jong,R.G.; and Commins,D.: 1983. CEC Joint Research on

Annoyance Due to Impulse Noise: Field Studies. Noise as a

Public Health Problem (Fourth International Congress), pp.

1085-1093, Centro Ricerche e Studi Amplifon, Milano, Italy.

FRA-252 GER-253 IRE-254 NET-255

de Jong,R.G.; and Groeneveld,Y.: 1983. Geluidhinder Rond

Militaire Vliegvelden - Een Nieuwe Benadering -.

(Translation Available in: Noise Annoyance Around

Military Airfields - A New Approach. 1989. NASA TM20488). TNO Report D-77. IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-193

de Jong,R.G.; and Groeneveld,Y.: 1990. Annoyance at Low

Noise Levels. Noise-Con 90, pp. 221-224.

NET-356

de Jong,R.G.; and Kok,W.C.: 1987. Laagvliegen, Ernstige

Hinder Bij 20 Ke. (Low Level Flying; Severe Annoyance at

20 Ke). Geluid En Omgeving (Noise and the Environment),

vol. December 1987, pp. 158-161.

NET-269

de Jong,R.G.; and Miedema,H.M.E.: 1996. Is Freight Traffic

Noise More Annoying Than Passenger Traffic Noise?

J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 193, pp. 35-38.

NET-153 UKD-116

de Jong,R.G.; Opmeer,C.H.J.M.; and Miedema,H.M.E.: 1994.

Hinder Door Milieuverontreiniging in Nederland.

(Annoyance by Environmental Pollution in the Netherlands).

TNO-PG nr 94.056. TNO Prevention and Health, Leiden.

NET-361

de Jong,R.G.; Opmeer,C.H.J.M.; and Miedema,H.M.E.: 1995.

Annoyance Caused by Environmental Pollutants in the

Netherlands. 15th International Congress on Acoustics, vol.

2, pp. 65-68.

NET-361

de Jong,R.G.; and Peeters,A.L.: 1983. Hinder Door

Spoorweggeluid in De Woonomgeving. (Railway Noise in

the Living Environment). Geluid En Omgeving (Noise and

the Environment), vol. 6, pp. 11-14.

NET-153

de Jong,R.G.; and Tukker,J.C.: 1983. Hinder Door

Spoorweglawaai. (Annoyance by Railroad Traffic Noise).

NAG Report 67. pp. 48-59, TNO, Delft.

NET-153

de Jong,R.G.; van den Berg,R.; and Stolk,J.W.: 1981e. Research

on the Effects of Impulsive Sounds on Human Beings -

Subgroup 1: Field Enquiries and Measurements (2

Volumes). IMG-TNO report D56. IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-260

Demeter,E.; and Berndt,M.: 1996. Population's Reaction on

Road Traffic Noise: a Field Survey. Inter-noise 96, pp. 1883-

1886, Liverpool, England.

HUN-458
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-108-

Dempsey,T.K.; Stephens,D.G.; Fields,J.M.; and Shepherd,K.P.:

1983. Residents' Annoyance Responses to Aircraft Noise

Events. NASA TP-2121. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-219

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft: 1974. DFGForschungsbericht Fluglärmwirkungen: Eine

Interdisziplinäre Untersuchung Über Die Auswirkungen Des

Fluglärms Auf Den Menschen. (DFG-Research-Report

Aircraft Noise: An Interdisciplinary Investigation of the

Effect of Aircraft Noise on People)[The Translations Include

the Chapters and Corresponding Appendices Which Relate

to General Descriptions of the Project (Chapter 1,2, and 3),

to the Social Survey (Chapter 4) and to the InterDisciplinary Parts (Chapter 8) of the Analysis: Aircraft

Noise Effects: Part I: Basic Report. NASA-TM-75819;

Aircraft Noise Effects: Part II: Annex Volume. NASA TM75818; and Aircraft Noise Effects: Part III: Social Scientific

Supplementary Report. NASA-TM-75802]. Harald Boldt

Verlag KG, Boppard.

GER-034

Diamond,I.D.; Ollerhead,J.B.; Bradshaw,S.A.; Walker,J.G.; and

Critchley,J.B.: 1988. A Study of Community Disturbance

Caused by General and Business Aviation Operations.

University of Southampton, England.

UKD-324

Diamond,I.D.; Reyner,L.; Horne,J.A.; and Brooks,V.: 2000.

Multilevel Discrete Time Hazards Models of Sleep

Disturbance Due to Aircraft Noise at Night. Inter-noise

2000, vol. 2, pp. 1353-1356, Nice, France.

UKD-339

Diamond,I.D.; and Rice,C.G.: 1987. Models of Community

Reaction To Noise From More Than One Source, in H. S.

Koelega (ed), Environmental Annoyance: Characterization,

Measurement, and Control. pp. 301-312, Elsevier,

Amsterdam.

UKD-238

Diamond,I.D.; Smith,A.P.; Hayward,S.; Heatherley,S.; and

Sheppard,Z.: 2000. Perceptions of Health Effects of Night

Aircraft Noise. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 974-978, Nice, France.

UKD-482 UKD-489

Diamond,I.D.; Stephenson,R.; Sheppard,Z.; Smith,A.P.;

Hayward,S.; Heatherley,S.; Raw,G.J.; and Stansfeld,S.A.:

2000. Perceptions of Aircraft Noise, Sleep and Health., Dept.

Social Statistics, University of Southampton.

UKD-424 UKD-482 UKD-489

Diamond,I.D.; and Walker,J.G.: 1986a. An International Study

of the Influence of Residual Noise on Community

Disturbance to Aircraft Noise. Inter-noise 86, pp. 941-946.

UKD-238 FRA-239 NET-240

Diamond,I.D.; and Walker,J.G.: 1986b. CEC Joint Research

Project: Community Reactions to Aircraft Noise: Final

Report. ISVR, Univ. of Southampton.

UKD-238 FRA-239 NET-240

Diamond,I.D.; Walker,J.G.; Critchley,J.B.; and Richmond,G.C.:

1986. CEC Joint Study of Community Response to Aircraft

Noise 1984, Joint Report: The Influence of Residual Noise

on Disturbance From Aircraft Noise. DR Report 8601. Civil

Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-238

Diamond,I.D.; Walker,J.G.; Ollerhead,J.B.; Critchley,J.B.; and

Bradshaw,S.A.: 1987. Studying Community Disturbance

Around General and Business Aviation Aerodromes.

Institute of Acoustics, Spring 1987 (Portsmouth).

UKD-243 UKD-324

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1971.

Aircraft Noise in the Neighborhood of London Heathrow

Airport, 1967. DORA Report no. 7105. Dept. of Trade and

Industry, London.

UKD-024

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1978a.

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance. DORA

Communication 7815. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-147

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1978b. Night

Noise Disturbance Study: Tabulations of the Responses to

the Pilot Administered Survey Conducted Around London

(Heathrow) Airport, December 1977. DORA

Communication 7813. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-147

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1978c. Night

Noise Disturbance Study: Tabulations of the Responses to

the Pilot Postal Surveys Conducted Around London

(Heathrow) Airport, Winter/Spring 1978. DORA

Communication 7814. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-147

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1979.

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance: Summary of

Comments and Suggestions Received After the Preliminary

Phase of the Study. DORA Report no. 7817. Civil Aviation

Authority, London.

UKD-147

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1980a.

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance: A Description of the

Noise Measurement and Analysis Programme for the Main

Phase of the Study. DORA Communication 8003. Civil

Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-182

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1980b.

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance: A Selection of

Tabulations of the Responses to the Administered Surveys

for the Main Phase of the Study. DORA Communication

8006. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-182

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1980c.

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance: A Selection of

Tabulations of the Responses to the Postal Surveys for the

Main Phase of the Study. DORA Report no. 8007. Civil

Aviation Authority, London.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-109-

UKD-182

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1980d.

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance: Designated Night

Data for Sites Surveyed in the Main Phase of the Study.

DORA Report no. 8004. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-182

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1980e.

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance: Final Report. DORA

Report no. 8008. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-182

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1980f.

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance: Noise Climate Data

for Sites Surveyed in the Main Phase of the Study. DORA

Communication 8005. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-182

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1982a.

Reaction to Aircraft Noise Around Hamble Airfield. DORA

Communication 8105. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-309

Directorate of Operational Research and Analysis: 1982b.

Reaction to Aircraft Noise Near General Aviation Airfields.

DORA Report 8203. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-243

Dixit,A.K.; and Reburn,J.O.: 1980. Community Reaction to

Railway Yard Noise. Inter-noise 80, pp. 883-886.

CAN-169

Duhs,E.; Eddington,N.; and Renew,W.D.: 1988. Noise

Annoyance Study - Brisbane. Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Fifth International Congress), vol. 3: Performance,

Behaviour, Animal, Combined Agents and Community

Responses, pp. 175-180, Swedish Council for Building

Research, Stockholm.

AUL-286

Dunn,B.E.; Hanington,C.E.; Wilk,H.A.; Wilson,S.A.; and

Dunn,L.K.: 1985. A New Look at Noise Effects on Time

Sharing Tasks. Inter-noise 85, pp. 981-984.

CAN-078

Dunn,B.E.; and Jones,H.W.: 1975. Environmental Noise in a

Medium Size Canadian City. Inter-noise 75, pp. 421-424.

CAN-078

Dunn,B.E.; and Posey,M.H.: 1974. Calgary Noise Survey Vol.

II: The Human Response to Noise. Calgary Univ., Calgary.

CAN-078

Eddington,N.; and Eddington,I.: 1988. Environmental Noise

Disamenity in an Australian Provincial City. Noise as a

Public Health Problem (Fifth International Congress), vol. 3:

Performance, Behaviour, Animal, Combined Agents and

Community Responses, pp. 181-185, Swedish Council for

Building Research, Stockholm.

AUL-287

Edmiston,R.P.: 1972. Evaluation of Noise Pollution Level Based

Upon Community Exposure and Response Data. NASA CR130920. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-032

Edwards,R.M.: 1975. A Social Survey to Examine the Variance

of Aircraft Noise Annoyance. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 41, pp.

41-51.

UKD-086

Edwards,R.M.; and Ollerhead,J.B.: 1974. A Survey of Aircraft

Noise Annoyance in an Area of Invariant Noise to Eliminate

the Effects on Annoyance of Varying Noise Exposure.

Report TT 7405. Loughborough Univ. of Tech..

UKD-086

Edwards,R.G.; Broderson,A.B.; Barbour,R.W.; McCoy,D.F.;

and Johnson,C.W.: 1979. Assessment of the Environmental

Compatibility of Differing Helicopter Noise Certification

Standards. Report no. FAA-AEE-79-13. Federal Aviation

Administration.

USA-167

Edwards,R.G.; Broderson,A.B.; and Johnson,C.W.: 1980.

Helicopter Noise Impact. Sound and Vibration, vol. 14, pp.

20-25.

USA-167

Environmental Agency of Japan: 1973. An Investigation on the

Shinkansen Train Noise. Special Pollution Division, Air

Quality Bureau, Environmental Agency of Japan.

JPN-064

Ericz,W.J.; Noordam,A.; and Schoonderbeek,W.: 1986.

Trollificering Van Buslijn 9 in Arnhem. Onderzoek Naar De

Effecten Van Geluidhinder. (Trolley Conversion of Busline

#9 in Arnhem. Research on the Effects on Noise

Annoyance). Noise Series #GA-HR-12-1. Ministerie VROM,

Leidschendam.

NET-362

FAA: 1980. Effects of Airport Noise on a Neighboring State:

Report to Congress. Office of Environment and Energy,

FAA, Washington, D.C.

USA-191

Faburel,G.; and Luchini,S.: 2000. The Social Cost of Aircraft

Noise: the Contingent Valuation Method Applied to ParisOrly Airport. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 3401-3406, Nice, France.

FRA-391

Federal Aviation Administration: 1977. Concorde Monitoring

Summary Report Dulles International Airport May 1976-

May 1977. Department of Transportation, FAA,

Washington, D.C.

USA-127

Federal Aviation Administration: 1979. Concorde Monitoring

Summary Report J.F.K. International Airport November

1977-November 1978. Department of Transportation, FAA,

Washington, D.C.

USA-144

Felscher-Suhr,U.: 1997. On the Difference in the Evolution of

Judgements Depending on Either Retrospective or Actual

Noise Annoyance Measurement. Inter-noise 97, pp. 1179-

1182, Budapest, Hungary.

GER-472

Felscher-Suhr,U.; Guski,R.; Hunecke,M.; Kastka,J.; Paulsen,R.;
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-110-

and Schümer,R.: 1996. Disturbance of Every Day Activities

Due to Road Traffic and Aircraft Noise. Inter-noise 96, pp.

2321-2324, Liverpool, England.

GER-472

Felscher-Suhr,U.; Guski,R.; Hunecke,M.; Kastka,J.; Paulsen,R.;

Schümer,R.; and Vogt,J.: 1996. Eine Methodologische

Studie Zur Aktuellen Erfassung Von Alltagstätigkeiten Und

Deren Störungen Durch Umweltlärm (A Methodological

Study on the Measurement of Every Day Activities and Their

Disturbances Due to Environmental Noise). Zeitschrift Für

Lärmbekämpfung, vol. 43, pp. 61-68.

GER-472

Fidell,S.A.: 1977. The Urban Noise Survey. Report No. EPA

550-9-77-100. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Washington, D.C.

USA-102

Fidell,S.A.: 1978. Nationwide Urban Noise Survey.

J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 1, vol. 64, pp. 198-206.

USA-102

Fidell,S.A.: 2000. Developing a Criterion for the Annoyance of

Low Frequency Aircraft Noise. Inter-noise 2000, Nice,

France.

USA-429 USA-432

Fidell,S.A.; Barber,D.S.; and Schultz,T.J.: 1991. Updating a

Dosage-Effect Relationship for the Prevalence of Annoyance

Due to General Transportation Noise. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol.

89, pp. 221-233.

AUL-210 AUS-014 AUS-093 BEL-122 BEL-137 CAN-121

CAN-168 DEN-075 DEN-200 FRA-016 FRA-019 FRA-041

FRA-063 GER-034 SWE-021 SWE-025 SWE-035 SWE-165

SWE-228 SWI-053 UKD-008 UKD-024 UKD-071 UKD116 USA-022 USA-032 USA-044 USA-082 USA-102 USA203 USA-204 USA-250 USA-301 USA-338

Fidell,S.A.; and Horonjeff,R.D.: 1982. Dosage-Response

Relationships for Community Annoyance With Blasting.

Inter-noise 82, pp. 585-588.

USA-206

Fidell,S.A.; and Horonjeff,R.D.: 1985. Reply to "Re-Analysis of

Data Presented in `Community Response to Blasting'".

J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 2, vol. 78, pp. 800-801.

USA-206

Fidell,S.A.; Horonjeff,R.D.; Mills,J.; Baldwin,E.;

Teffeteller,S.R.; and Pearsons,K.S.: 1985. Aircraft Noise

Annoyance at Three Joint Air Carrier and General Aviation

Airports. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 3, vol. 77, pp. 1054-1068.

USA-203 USA-204 USA-301

Fidell,S.A.; Horonjeff,R.D.; Schultz,T.J.; and Teffeteller,S.R.:

1982. Initial Field Studies of Community Response to Blast

Noise and Vibration. BBN Rep. 4731. Bolt Beranek and

Newman, Canoga Park, California.

USA-206

Fidell,S.A.; Horonjeff,R.D.; Schultz,T.J.; and Teffeteller,S.R.:

1983. Community Response to Blasting. J.Acoust.Soc.Am.,

3, vol. 74, pp. 888-893.

USA-206

Fidell,S.A.; Horonjeff,R.D.; Teffeteller,S.R.; and Pearsons,K.S.:

1981. Community Sensitivity to Changes in Aircraft Noise

Exposure. NASA CR-3490. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-203

Fidell,S.A.; Howe,R.; Tabachnick,B.; Pearsons,K.S.; and

Sneddon,M.: 1995. Noise-Induced Sleep Disturbance in

Residences Near Two Civil Airports. NASA CR 198252.

NASA, Hampton, VA.

USA-430

Fidell,S.A.; and Jones,G.: 1975. Effects of Cessation of LateNight Flights on an Airport Community. J.Sound Vib., 4,

vol. 42, pp. 441-427.

USA-082

Fidell,S.A.; Jones,G.; and Pearsons,K.S.: 1973. Feasibility of a

Novel Technique for Assessing Noise-Induced Annoyance--

Human Response to Community Noise Exposure. DOT-TST74-3 (Bolt Beranek and Newman Report no. BBN-2423).

Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

USA-091

Fidell,S.A.; Mills,J.; Teffeteller,S.R.; and Pearsons,K.S.: 1982.

Community Response to Three Noise Abatement Departure

Procedures at John Wayne Airport. BBN Rep. 4743. Bolt

Beranek and Newman, Canoga Park, California.

USA-204

Fidell,S.A.; and Pearsons,K.S.: 1985b. Comments on "The

Effect of Changes in Aircraft Noise Exposure". J.Sound Vib.,

4, vol. 102, pp. 583-584.

USA-203

Fidell,S.A.; and Pearsons,K.S.: 1985a. Comments on Reply to

"The Effect of Changes in Aircraft Noise Exposure". J.Sound

Vib., vol. 103, pp. 139-140.

USA-203

Fidell,S.A.; Pearsons,K.S.; Howe,R.; Tabachnick,B.; Silvati,L.;

and Barber,D.S.: 1994. Noise-Induced Sleep Disturbance in

Residential Settings. AL/OE-TR-1994-0131. Armstrong

Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base.

USA-433

Fidell,S.A.; Pearsons,K.S.; Tabachnick,B.; Howe,R.; Silvati,L.;

and Barber,D.S.: 1995. Field Study of Noise-Induced Sleep

Disturbance. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 98, pp. 1025-1033.

USA-433

Fidell,S.A.; and Silvati,L.: 1991. An Assessment of the Effect of

Residential Acoustic Insulation on Prevalence of Annoyance

in an Airport Community. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 89, pp.

244-247.

USA-349

Fidell,S.A.; and Silvati,L.: 1998. Evaluation of Community

Response to Noise Following Completion of Runway

08L/26R at Vancouver International Airport. BBN Report

No. 8247.

CAN-385

Fidell,S.A.; Silvati,L.; and Fletcher,E.: 1995. Social Survey of

Community Response to Noise Exposure Near Vancouver
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-111-

International Airport. 8105. BBN Acoustic Technologies

Division, Canoga Park, California.

CAN-385

Fidell,S.A.; Silvati,L.; and Howe,R.: 1996. Social Survey of

Community Preferences for Aircraft Noise Mitigation

Measures. BBN Report No. 8172. BBN Systems and

Technologies, Canoga Park, CA.

USA-428

Fidell,S.A.; Silvati,L.; and Pearsons,K.S.: 1995. Social Survey

of Community Response to Noise Exposure Near SeattleTacoma International Airport. BBN Technical Report No.

8070. Bolt Beranek and Newman Systems and Technology,

Canoga Park, CA.

USA-431

Fidell,S.A.; Silvati,L.; and Pearsons,K.S.: 1996. On the

Noticeability of Small and Gradual Declines in Aircraft

Noise Exposure Levels. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2247-2252,

Liverpool, England.

USA-431

Fidell,S.A.; Silvati,L.; Pearsons,K.S.; Howe,R.; and

Sneddon,M.: 2000. Studies of the Annoyance of Low

Frequency Aircraft Noise at Two Civil Airports. Inter-noise

2000, Nice, France.

USA-429 USA-432

Fidell,S.A.; Silvati,L.; Pearsons,K.S.; Lind,S.; and Howe,R.:

1999. Field Study of the Annoyance of Low-Frequency

Runway Sideline Noise. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 3, vol. 106, pp.

1408-1415.

USA-432

Fidell,S.A.; Tabachnick,B.; Pearsons,K.S.; and Howe,R.: 2000.

Effects on Sleep Disturbance of Changes in Aircraft Noise

Near Three Airports. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 5, vol. 107, pp.

2535-2547.

USA-430

Fidell,S.A.; Teffeteller,S.R.; and Pearsons,K.S.: 1979. Initial

Study on the Effects of Transformer and Transmission Line

Noise on People, Vol. 3: Community Reaction. EA-1240,

vol. 3. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Palo Alto,

California.

USA-216

Fidell,S.; Howe,R.; Tabachnick,B.; Pearsons,K.S.; Silvati,L.;

Sneddon,M.; and Fletcher,E.: 1998. Field Studies of

Habituation to Change in Nighttime Aircraft Noise and of

Sleep Motility Measurement Methods. BBN Report 8195.

pp. 1-108, BBN, Canoga Park, CA.

USA-435

Fiedler,F.E.; and Fiedler,J.: 1974. The Social Impact of the

Seattle-Tacoma Airport on the Community. DOT-FA73

NW-011.

USA-085

Fiedler,F.E.; and Fiedler,J.: 1975. Port Noise Complaints:

Verbal and Behavioral Reactions to Airport-Related Noise.

J.Appl.Psych., vol. 60, pp. 498-506.

USA-085

Fields,J.M.: 1977. Railway Noise Annoyance in Residential

Areas: Current Findings and Suggestions For Future

Research. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 51, pp. 343-351.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.: 1979. Railway Noise and Vibration Annoyance in

Residential Areas. J.Sound Vib., vol. 66, pp. 445-458.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.: 1981. A Catalog of Social Surveys of Residents'

Reactions to Environmental Noise (1943-1980). NASA TM83187. NASA, Washington, D.C.

Fields,J.M.: 1983. Variability in Individuals' Responses to

Noise: Community Differences. Inter-noise 83, pp. 965-968.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.: 1991. An Updated Catalog of 318 Social Surveys of

Residents' Reactions to Environmental Noise (1943-1989).

NASA TM-187553. NASA, Washington, D.C.

Fields,J.M.: 1996. Measuring Residents' Reactions to Noise

With a Magnitude Scale. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2382-2388.

USA-375

Fields,J.M.: 1997. Reactions of Residents to Long-Term Sonic

Boom Noise Environments. NASA TM-20103. NASA,

Washington, D.C.

USA-375

Fields,J.M.; and Hall,F.L.: 1987. Community Effects of Noise,

Chapt. 3, in P. M. Nelson (ed), Transportation Noise

Reference Book. pp. 3-1-3/27, Butterworths & Co, London.

CAN-120

Fields,J.M.; Moulton,C.; Baumgartner,R.M.; and Thomas,J.:

1994. Residents' Reactions to Long-Term Sonic Boom

Exposure: Preliminary Results. NASA CP-3279. pp. 193-

208, NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-375

Fields,J.M.; and Powell,C.A.: 1985. A Community Survey of

Helicopter Noise Annoyance Conducted Under Controlled

Noise Exposure Conditions. NASA TM-86400. NASA,

Washington, D.C.

USA-235

Fields,J.M.; and Powell,C.A.: 1987. Community Reactions to

Helicopter Noise: Results From an Experimental Study.

J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 82, pp. 479-492.

USA-235

Fields,J.M.; and Tomberlin,T.J.: 1978. Noise Survey Design and

the Precision of Statistical Results: Further Evaluation of the

Design of a National Railway Noise Survey. Inter-noise 78,

pp. 597-600.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1977a. A National Study of

Railway Noise in Great Britain: the First Assessment of Its

Design. Noise-Con 77, pp. 137-154.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1977b. The Effects of Railway

Noise and Vibration on the Community. ISVR Contract

Report 77/18. Univ. of Southampton, England.

UKD-116
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-112-

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1978. Reactions to Railway Noise

in Great Britain. Inter-noise 78, pp. 585-590.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1980a. Community Response to

Railway Noise in Great Britain. 10th International Congress

on Acoustics, Sydney, pp. C2-9.2.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1980b. Comparing Reactions to

Transportation Noises From Different Surveys: a Railway

Noise Vs. Aircraft and Road Traffic Comparison. Noise as a

Public Health Problem (Third International Congress),

ASHA Report 10, pp. 580-587, American Speech-LanguageHearing Association, Rockville, Maryland.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1980c. Reactions to Railway

Noise in Great Britain: An Updated Report. Inter-noise 80,

pp. 871-874.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1980d. Reactions to Railway

Noise: A Survey Near Railway Lines in Great Britain Vols. I

and II. ISVR Technical Report 102. Institute of Sound and

Vibration Research, Southampton, England.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1980e. Traction Type and Railway

Noise Annoyance. ISVR Contract Report No. 8013. ISVR,

Southampton.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1982a. Comparing the

Relationships Between Noise Level and Annoyance in

Different Surveys: A Railway Noise Vs. Aircraft and Road

Traffic Comparison. J.Sound Vib., vol. 81, pp. 51-80.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; and Walker,J.G.: 1982b. The Response to Railway

Noise in Residential Areas in Great Britain. J.Sound Vib.,

vol. 85, pp. 177-255.

UKD-116

Fields,J.M.; Walker,J.G.; and Large,J.B.: 1976. Designing a

National Study of Railway Noise in Great Britain. Internoise 76, pp. 203-208.

UKD-116

Finke,H.O.; Guski,R.; and Rohrmann,B.: 1980. Betroffenheit

Einer Stadt Durch Lärm, Bericht Über Eine InterDisziplinäre Untersuchung. (Objective and Subjective

Impact on a Town: Report of an Interdisciplinary

Investigation). Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.

GER-134

Finke,H.O.; and Martin,R.: 1974. Fluglärm in WohngebietenMessung Und Beurteilung. Paper DGLR-74-27368.

(Translation Available in: Aircraft Noise in Residential

Areas: Measurement and Evaluation. NASA TT-F-15,907.

NASA, Washington, D.C.). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Luft -

und Raumfahrt, Symposium über Triebwerkslärm,

Braunschweig, West Germany, February 20-21, pp. 1-8.

GER-034

Finke,H.O.; Martin,R.; Guski,R.; Rohrmann,B.; Schümer,R.;

and Schümer-Kohrs,A.: 1975. Effects of Aircraft Noise on

Man. J.Sound Vib., vol. 43, pp. 335-349.

GER-034

Flindell,I.H.: 1979. A Combined Laboratory and Field Study of

Traffic Noise. Institute of Acoustics, Spring 1979

(Southampton), p. 20.N3.1-20.N3.4.

UKD-176

Flindell,I.H.: 1982. Community Response to Multiple Noise

Sources (Ph.D. Dissertation), Institute of Sound and

Vibration Research, Southampton, England.

UKD-176

Flindell,I.H.; Bullmore,A.J.; Robertson,K.A.; Wright,N.A.;

Turner,C.; Birch,C.L.; Jiggins,M.; Berry,B.F.; Davison,M.;

and Dix,M.: 2000. Aircraft Noise and Sleep -- 1999 UK

Trial Methodology Study., ISVR Consultancy Services.

UKD-483

Florentine,M.; Namba,S.; and Kuwano,S.: 1986. Concepts of

Loudness, Noisiness, Noise and Annoyance in the U.S.A.,

Japan, and England. Inter-noise 86, pp. 831-834.

JPN-510 UKD-512 USA-513

Fog,H.; and Jonsson,E.: 1968. Traffic Noise in Residential

Areas. Report 36 E/1986. The National Swedish Institute for

Building Research, Stockholm.

SWE-021

Foreman,J.E.K.; and Dickinson,S.M.: 1973. Noise Measurement

and Attitudinal Surveys of the Cities of London and

Woodstock. Report # 1. Univ. of Western Ontario (Faculty of

Engineering Science), London, Canada.

CAN-076

Foreman,J.E.K.; and Dickinson,S.M.: 1974. Community Noise

Survey of Typical Cities (London and Woodstock) in

Ontario. Eighth International Congress on Acoustics, pp. 93-

93, London, England.

CAN-076

Foreman,J.E.K.; Emmerson,M.A.; and Dickinson,S.M.: 1974.

Noise Level/Attitudinal Surveys of London and Woodstock,

Ontario. Sound and Vibration, 8, vol. 8, pp. 16-22.

CAN-076

Francois,J.: 1972. La Gêne Causée Par Le Bruit Des Avions Au

Voisinage De L'Aéroport D'Orly Et Les Réactions Des

Riverains: Etude Qualitive. (Translation Available in: The

Annoyance Caused by Airplane Noise in the Vicinity of Orly

Airport and the Reaction of Neighboring Residents:

Qualitative Research. NASA TM-76575, 1981). Institut

Français d'Opinion Publique, Paris.

FRA-056

Francois,J.: 1974. La Gêne Causée Par Le Bruit Des Avions

Autour De L'Aéroport De Strasbourg: Etude Exploratoire.

(The Annoyance Caused by Aircraft Noise Around

Strasbourg Airport: Exploratory Research). IFOP/ETMAR,

Paris.

FRA-218

Francois,J.: 1975a. Incidences Des Modifications De La
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-113-

Methode De Calcul De L'Indice Psophique. (Changes in the

Method of Calculating the Isopsophic Index)(Translation

Available in: Incidences From Modification of the

Computational Methods of the Psophic Index. NASA TM76577, 1981). IFOP/ETMAR, Paris.

FRA-056

Francois,J.: 1975b. La Gêne Causée Par L'Aviation Légère:

Etude Menée Autour De L'Aéroport De St. Cyr L'Ecole. (The

Annoyance Caused by Light Aircraft: Study Conducted

Around the Airport of St. Cyr L'Ecole). IFOP/ETMAR,

Paris.

FRA-087

Francois,J.: 1975c. Le Bruit Et La Gêne Autour De L'Aéroport

De Strasbourg. (Noise and Annoyance Around Strasbourg

Airport). IFOP/ETMAR, Paris.

FRA-218

Francois,J.: 1975d. Les Répercussions Du Bruit Des Avions Sur

L'Equilibre Des Riverains Des Aéroports: Recherche Menée

Autour De Roissy Et D'Orly. (The Effects of Aircraft Noise

on the Equilibrium of Residents Around Airports: Research

Conducted Around Roissy and Orly)[This Report Has Been

Translated into English]. IFOP/ETMAR. Paris.

FRA-098 FRA-099 FRA-113

Francois,J.: 1977a. La Prise En Compte De La Gêne Nocturne

Dans Le Calcul De L'Indice Psyophique. (Taking Account of

Night-Time Annoyance in the Calculation of N)(Translation

Available in: Taking Into Account Nighttime Annoyance in

the Calculation of the Psophic Index. NASA TM-76580,

1981). IFOP/ETMAR, Paris.

FRA-113 FRA-098

Francois,J.: 1977b. Répercussion Du Bruit Des Avions Sur

L'Equilibre Des Riverains Des Aéroports: Analyses

Complémentaires De L'Enquête Realisée Autour D'Orly.

(Translation Available in: Effects of Aircraft Noise on the

Equilibrium of Airport Residents: Supplementary Analyses

to the Study Carried Out Around Orly. NASA TM-76627,

1981). IFOP/ETMAR, Paris.

FRA-113

Francois,J.: 1977c. Répercussion Du Bruit Des Avions Sur

L'Equilibre Des Riverains Des Aéroports: Test Et Mise Au

Point D'Une Methodologie Nouvelle. (Translation Available

in: Effects of Aircraft Noise on the Equilibrium of Airport

Residents: Testing and Utilization of a New Methodology.

NASA TM-76628, 1981). IFOP/ETMAR, Paris.

FRA-131

Francois,J.: 1979a. Les Répercussions Du Bruit Des Avions Sur

L'Equilibre Des Riverains Des Aéroports: Etude

Longitudinal Autour De Roissy, 3ème Phase. (Effects of

Aircraft Noise on the Equilibrium of Airport Residents:

Longitudinal Study Around Roissy, Phase 3)(Translation

Available in: Effect of Aircraft Noise on the Equilibrium of

Airport Residents: Longitudinal Study Around Roissy--

Phase III. NASA TM-75906, 1981). IFOP/ETMAR, Paris.

FRA-150

Francois,J.: 1979b. Nature De La Gêne Et Relation Bruit-Gêne

Autour Des Aéroports. (Nature of the Annoyance and

Relation of Noise-Annoyance Around Airports)(Translation

Available in: Nature of the Annoyance and Noise Annoyance

Relation Around Airports. NASA TM-75873, 1981). Revue

D'Acoustique, vol. 48, pp. 70-78.

FRA-113 FRA-098 FRA-056

Francois,J.: 1980. Aircraft Noise, Annoyance, and Personal

Characteristics. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Third

International Congress)ASHA Report 10, pp. 594-599,

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville,

Maryland.

FRA-113 FRA-099

Francois,J.; and Roche,J.P.: 1973. Liaison Entre Le Bruit Et La

Gêne Autour D'Orly (Translation Available in: The

Relationship Between Noise and Annoyance Around Orly.

NASA TM-76573, 1981). Institut Français d'Opinion

Publique, Paris.

FRA-056

Franken,P.A.: 1971. Urban Noise Problems and Potential

Solutions. Seventh International Congress on Acoustics, vol.

1, pp. 233-236, Budapest.

USA-057

Franssen,E.A.M.; de Jong,R.G.; Lebret,E.; Miedema,H.M.E.;

van Poll,H.F.P.M.; Vos,H.; Walda,I.C.; and van

Wiechen,C.M.A.G.: 1998. Hinder, Slaapverstoring,

Gezondheid En Belevingsaspecten in De Regio Schiphol,

Resultaten Van Een Vragenlijstonderzoek. (Annoyance,

Sleep Disturbance, Health and Experience Aspects in the

Schiphol Region: Results of a Survey). TNO -PG Report

number 98.039, RIVM Report Number 441520010. TNO,

Leiden.

NET-371

Franssen,E.A.M.; de Jong,R.G.; Lebret,E.; Miedema,H.M.E.;

van Poll,H.F.P.M.; Vos,H.; Walda,I.C.; and van

Wiechen,C.M.A.G.: 1999. Annoyance, Sleep Disturbance,

Health Aspects, Perceived Risk, and Residential Satisfaction

Around Schiphol Airport; Results of a Questionnaire Survey.

Summary. TNO-PG: 98.052; RIVM:441520011. TNO,

Leiden/Bilthoven.

NET-371

Franssen,E.A.M.; Lebret,E.; and Staatsen,B.A.M.: 1999. Health

Impact Assessment Schiphol Airport. RIVM 441520 012.

RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands.

NET-371

Franssen,E.A.M.; Van Kamp,I.; and de Jong,R.G.: 2000.

Annoyance and Health Around Schiphol Airport and in a

Control Area. Inter-noise 2000, Nice, France.

NET-371 3080

Franssen,E.A.M.; van Wiechen,C.M.A.G.; van Poll,H.F.P.M.;

Kruize,H.; de Jong,R.G.; Miedema,H.M.E.; and Lebret,E.:

1998. Self-Reported Health, Risk Perception and Residential

Satisfaction Around Schiphol Airport, Netherlands. Noise

Effects ‘98: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Seventh
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-114-

International Congress), Congress Program and Abstract

book, p. 156.

NET-371

Fricks,P.T.: 1980. A Social Survey of Community Attitudes

Towards Noise. Bureau of Environmental Protection, Salt

Lake City, Utah.

USA-183

Fujimoto,K.: 1991. Relation Between Evaluation of Residential

Environment and Annoyance of Noise. Korea-Japan Joint

Symposium on Acoustics (Commemoration of 10th

Anniversary of ASK), pp. 424-429.

JPN-438 JPN-440 JPN-441 JPN-442

Fujimoto,K.: 1993. How Important Do People Think Quiet Is for

a Residential Environment? Inter-noise 93, pp. 1137-1140,

Leuven, Belgium.

JPN-438

Fujimoto,K.: 1994. How Important Do People Think Quiet Is for

a Residential Environment? (Part 2). Inter-noise 94, pp. 967-

972, Yokohama, Japan.

JPN-438 JPN-440 JPN-441 JPN-442 JPN-443

Fujimoto,K.; and Haruta,C.: 1988. An Investigation on the

Alarm Sound of Grade Crossings: A Survey of the Opinions

on Alarm Sound. WESTPACIII (Western Pacific Acoustics

Conference III -- Shanghai), pp. 1059-1062, Shanghai.

JPN-441

Fujimoto,K.; Haruta,C.; and Sakata,N.: 1986. Jidôsha Sôon No

Nichijô Seikatsu He No Eikyô No Chôsa to Sono Bunseki.

(Survey of Effects of Road Traffic Noise on Daily Life).

J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn., 6, vol. 42, pp. 432-440.

JPN-440

Furuya,H.; Fujimoto,K.; and Haruta,C.: 1994. Survey on

Environmental Noise and Human Response to

Environmental Sounds. Inter-noise 94, pp. 1161-1164.

JPN-443

Gabriel,R.F.; Langdon,L.E.; Creamer,L.R.; and Kushner,D.C.:

1981. A Field Investigation of the Relationship of Aircraft

Noise Exposure and Annoyance. Report MDC J8528.

Douglas Aircraft Co., Long Beach, California.

USA-215

Galloway,W.J.: 1977. An Assessment of the Relative

Importance of Sources of Urban Noise. Noise Control

Engineering, 2, vol. 9, pp. 68-73.

USA-102

Galloway,W.J.; Clark,W.E.; and Kerrick,J.S.: 1969. Highway

Noise: Measurement, Simulation and Mixed Reactions.

Report No. NCHRP-REP.-78. Highway Research Board,

Washington, D.C.

USA-043

Gambart,R.; Myncke,H.; and Cops,A.: 1976. Study of

Annoyance by Traffic Noise in Leuven (Belgium). Applied

Acoustics, 3, vol. 9, pp. 193-203.

BEL-107

Gamble,H.B.; Langley,C.J.; Pashek; Sauerlender,O.H.; and

Twark,R.D.: 1973. Community Effects of Highways

Reflected by Property Values. Report No. PB-233-157 (U.S.

Department of Transportation Report no. DOT-FH-11-

7800). Pennsylvania State Univ..

USA-070

Gamble,H.B.; Sauerlender,O.H.; and Langley,C.J.: 1974.

Adverse and Beneficial Effects of Highways on Residential

Property Values. pp. 37-48, Transportation Research Board,

National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences,

Washington, D.C.

USA-070

García,A.: 1983. Subjective Response to Noise Exposure in

Valencia. Inter-noise 83, pp. 938-942.

SPA-272 SPA-273 SPA-274

García,A.; and Fajari,M.: 1982. Respuesta Subjetiva Al Ruido

Del Tráfico En La Ciudad De Valencia. (Subjective

Response to Road Traffic Noise in the City of Valencia).

Revista De Acústica, vol. 13, pp. 19-32.

SPA-272 SPA-273 SPA-274

García,A.; and Fajari,M.: 1983. Traffic Noise Survey in

Valencia. Eleventh International Congress on Acoustics,

Lyon-Toulouse, Paris, vol. 7, pp. 377-380.

SPA-272

García,A.; Faus,L.J.; and García,A.M.: 1993. The Community

Response to Aircraft Noise Around Six Spanish Airports.

J.Sound Vib., vol. 164, pp. 45-52.

SPA-348

García,A.; Miralles,J.L.; García,A.M.; and Sempere,M.C.:

1988. Noise Nuisance Caused by Road Traffic in Urban

Areas. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth International

Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour, Animal,

Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp. 187-192,

Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm.

SPA-302

García,A.; Miralles,J.L.; García,A.M.; and Sempere,M.C.:

1990. Community Response to Environmental Noise in

Valencia. Env.Int., vol. 16, pp. 533-541.

SPA-302

García,A.; Romero,J.; and Alamar,M.: 1988. Traffic Noise

Exposure and Annoyance Reactions in Spain: a Review of

Three Surveys. Convegno Internazionale "IL RUMORE

URBANO E IL GOVERNO DEL TERRITORIO", pp. 199-

206.

SPA-272 SPA-273 SPA-274 SPA-302 SPA-313 SPA-317

García,A.; Romero,J.; García,A.M.; and Arana,M.: 1989.

Recent Studies on the Community Noise Response in Spain.

13th International Congress on Acoustics, Belgrade,

Yugoslavia, p. 7.5.1-7.5.4.

SPA-302 SPA-313 SPA-315

García,A.M.; and Romero,J.: 1986. Traffic Noise Survey in

Ganda. Convegno Annuale dell'Asociazione Italiana di

Acustica, Sorrento, April, pp. 115-122.

SPA-317

García,A.M.; and Romero,J.: 1987a. A Social Survey on the

Effects of Road Traffic Noise in Urban Areas. Federation of
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-115-

Acoustical Societies of Europe, FASE 87, pp. 173-176.

SPA-313 SPA-317

García,A.M.; and Romero,J.: 1987b. Road Traffic Noise and

Sleep Disturbance. Noise-Con 87, pp. 461-464.

SPA-313

Garnsworthy,J.: 1977. A Study of Question Order and Wording

Experiments (M.Sc. Dissertation), Dept. of Social Statistics,

Univ. of Southampton, England.

UKD-116

Gilbert,Ph.: 1973. The Effect of Train Noise on the

Environment. Institute of Acoustics, November 13-14, 1973

(Southampton).

FRA-063

Gjestland,T.; Granøien,I.L.N.; and Liasjø,K.H.: 1995.

Community Response to Noise From a Short Term Military

Aircraft Exercise. 15th International Congress on Acoustics,

vol. 2, pp. 109-112.

NOR-328

Gjestland,T.; Granøien,I.L.N.; Liasjø,K.H.; and Bugge,J.J.:

1993. Community Response to Noise From a Short Term

Military Aircraft Exercise. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a

Public Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2,

pp. 589-592, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

NOR-328

Gjestland,T.; Liasjø,K.H.; and Bøhn,H.E.: 1990. An Aircraft

Noise Study in Norway. NASA-CP-3067. pp. 289-302,

NASA, Washington, D.C.

NOR-311

Gjestland,T.; Liasjø,K.H.; and Granøien,I.L.N.: 1994. Response

to Noise Around Værnes and Bodø Airports. Report No.

STF40 A94095. SINTEF DELAB, Trondheim, Norway.

NOR-328 NOR-366

Gjestland,T.; Liasjø,K.H.; and Granøien,I.L.N.: 1995.

Community Response to Noise From Short-Term Military

Aircraft Exercises. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 182, pp. 221-228.

NOR-328

Gjestland,T.; Liasjø,K.H.; Granøien,I.L.N.; Bøhn,H.E.; and

Gaustad,A.: 1990. A Noise Survey Around Oslo Airport

Fornebu. Inter-noise 90, pp. 451-454.

NOR-311

Gjestland,T.; Liasjø,K.H.; Granøien,I.L.N.; and Fields,J.M.:

1990. Response to Noise Around Oslo Airport Fornebu.

Report No. STF40 A90189. ELAB-RUNIT, Trondheim,

Norway.

NOR-311

Goodman,R.F.; and Clary,B.B.: 1976. Community Attitudes and

Action in Response to Airport Noise. Environment and

Behavior, 3, vol. 8, pp. 441-470.

USA-245 USA-310

Goto,K.; Kaneko,T.; and Tokita,Y.: 2000. Annoyance and

Mental Health Status of People Around an Airport in Japan.

Inter-noise 2000, vol. 2, pp. 1379-1381, Nice, France.

JPN-500

Gourdin,D.: 1975. Boulder Community Noise Program

Attitudinal Survey, 12 August-17 September 1975.

U.S.E.P.A. Rocky Mountain-Prairie Region VIII, Denver,

Colorado.

USA-117

Graeven,D.B.: 1974. The Effects of Airplane Noise on Health:

An Examination of Three Hypotheses. J.Health and Social

Behavior, vol. 15, pp. 336-343.

USA-251

Graf,P.; Meier,H.P.; and Müller,R.: 1974. Sozio-Psychologische

Fluglärmuntersuchung Im Gebiet Der Drei Schweizer

Flughäfen, Zürich, Genf, Basel. (Translation Available in:

Sociopsychological Airplane Noise Investigation in the

Districts of Three Swiss Airports: Zurich, Geneva, and

Basel. NASA TM-75787). Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Soziopsychologische Fluglärmuntersuchung, Bern.

SWI-053

Graf,P.; Müller,R.; and Meier,H.P.: 1974. Enquêtes SocioPsychologiques Sur Le Bruit Des Avions Dans Le Périmètre

Des Trois Aéroports Suisses De Zurich, Genève, Et Bâle.

Office fédéral de l'air, Bern.

SWI-053

Grandjean,E.; Graf,P.; Lauber,A.; Meier,H.P.; and Mueller,R.:

1973. A Survey of Aircraft in Switzerland. International

Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem, Dubrovnik,

Yugoslavia, May 13-18, 1973. USEPA 550-9-73-008, pp.

745-659, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Washington D.C.

SWI-053

Grandjean,E.; Graf,P.; Lauber,A.; Meier,H.P.; and Mueller,R.:

1976. Survey on the Effects of Aircraft Noise Around Three

Civil Airports in Switzerland. Inter-noise 76, pp. 85-90.

SWI-053

Gray,P.G.: 1956. Examples of Interviewer Variability Taken

From Two Sample Surveys. Applied Statistics, 2, vol. 5, pp.

73-85.

UKD-003

Gray,P.G.; Cartwright,A.; and Parkin,P.H.: 1958. Noise In

Three Groups of Flats With Different Floor Insulations.

National Building Studies, Research Paper No. 27. HMSO,

London.

UKD-003

Griefahn,B.: 1988. Schlafverhalten Und Straßenverkehrslärm 

(Sleep Behavior and Street Traffic Noise). Arbeitsmedizin

Sozialmedizin Präventivmedizin, vol. 5, pp. 119-120.

GER-502

Griefahn,B.; Deppe,C.; Mehnert,P.; Moog,R.; Möhler,U.; and

Schümer-Kohrs,A.: 1998. Intermittent Versus Continuous

Noises. Their Influence on Sleep Latency and Motility

During the Night. Inter-noise 98, pp. 1013-1016,

Christchurch, New Zealand.

GER-465

Griefahn,B.; Deppe,C.; Mehnert,P.; Moog,R.; Möhler,U.; and

Schümer,R.: 1998. What Nighttimes Are Adequate to

Prevent Noise-Effects on Sleep? Noise Effects '98: Noise as a
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-116-

Public Health Problem (Seventh International Congress), pp.

445-450.

GER-465

Griefahn,B.; and Gros,E.: 1983. Disturbance of Sleep -

Interaction Between Noise, Personal, and Psychological

Variables. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fourth

International Congress), pp. 895-904, Centro Ricerche e

Studi Amplifon, Milano, Italy.

GER-502

Griefahn,B.; and Gros,E.: 1985. Zur Wirkung Von

Straßengeräuschen Auf Den Schlaf. Ergebnisse Einer

Feldstudie. (The Effect of Street Noise on Sleep. Results

From a Field Study). Arbeitsmedizin Sozialmedizin

Präventivmedizin, vol. 20, pp. 73-77.

GER-502

Griefahn,B.; and Gros,E.: 1986. Noise and Sleep at Home, a

Field Study on Primary and After-Effects. J.Sound Vib., 3,

vol. 105, pp. 373-383.

GER-502

Griefahn,B.; Gros,E.; Kauth,H.; and Rehm,S.: 1980. Sleep

Latency, Sleep Quality and Usual Traffic Noise. 10th

International Congress on Acoustics, pp. C.2-15.4.

GER-502

Griefahn,B.; Möhler,U.; and Schümer,R.: 1999. Vergleichende

Untersuchung Über Die Lärmrwirkung Bei Straßen Und

Schienenverkehr Abschlussbericht. (The Relative Noise

Effects Caused by Road and Railway Traffic. Final Report.).

München.

GER-470 GER-480

Griefahn,B.; Schümer-Kohrs,A.; Schümer,R.; Möhler,U.; and

Mehnert,P.: 2000. Physiological, Subjective, and

Behavioural Responses to Noise From Rail and Road Traffic.

Noise & Health, vol. 3, pp. 59-71.

GER-465

Griffiths,I.D.: 1968. A Note on the Traffic Noise Index and the

Equivalent Sound Level. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 8, pp. 298-

300.

UKD-030

Griffiths,I.D.; and Delauzun,F.R.: 1977a. Individual Differences

in Sensitivity to Traffic Noise. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 55, pp.

93-107.

UKD-118

Griffiths,I.D.; and Delauzun,F.R.: 1977b. Individual Differences

in Sensitivity to Traffic Noise. Institute of Acoustics, May

1977, p. 12.3.1-12.3.4.

UKD-118

Griffiths,I.D.; and Langdon,F.J.: 1968. Subjective Responses to

Road Traffic Noise. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 8, pp. 16-32.

UKD-030

Griffiths,I.D.; Langdon,F.J.; and Swan,M.A.: 1980. Subjective

Effects of Traffic Noise Exposure: Reliability and Seasonal

Effects. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 71, pp. 227-240.

UKD-157

Griffiths,I.D.; and Raw,G.J.: 1984. Subjective Response to

Decreases in Traffic Noise Exposure. Fourth Congress of the

Federation of Acoustical Societies of Europe, pp. 343-346.

UKD-237

Griffiths,I.D.; and Raw,G.J.: 1985b. Author's Reply. J.Sound

Vib., vol. 103, pp. 140-141.

USA-203

Griffiths,I.D.; and Raw,G.J.: 1985a. Author's Reply. J.Sound

Vib., vol. 102, pp. 585-587.

USA-203

Griffiths,I.D.; and Raw,G.J.: 1986. Community and Individual

Response to Changes in Traffic Noise Exposure. J.Sound

Vib., vol. 111, pp. 209-217.

UKD-237

Griffiths,I.D.; and Raw,G.J.: 1989. Adaptation to Changes in

Traffic Noise Exposure. J.Sound Vib., vol. 132, pp. 331-336.

UKD-237 UKD-268 UKD-297 UKD-298

Griffiths,I.D.; Raw,G.J.; Hill,C.A.; and Storrar,J.M.: 1985.

Gypsies' Response to Road Traffic Noise. J.Sound Vib., 1,

vol. 101, pp. 107-115.

UKD-284

Grigg,A.J.; Haboly,E.F.; and Cheng,M.C.: 2000. Evaluation of

Community Response to Aircraft Noise Following

Completion of a New Runway at Vancouver International

Aiport. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 596-600, Nice, France.

CAN-385

Grimwood,C.J.: 1993. Effects of Environmental Noise on People

at Home. BRE Information Paper IP22/93. Building

Research Establishment, Watford, UK.

UKD-423

Grimwood,C.J.: 1997. Complaints About Poor Sound Insulation

Between Dwellings in England and Wales. Applied

Acoustics, 3/4, vol. 52, pp. 211-223.

UKD-484

Grimwood,C.J.; Ling,M.K.; and Wright,P.: 1998. Incidence of

and Attitude to Environmental Noise in England and Wales.

Inter-noise 98, pp. 879-882, Christchurch, New Zealand.

UKD-423 UKD-885

Grimwood,C.J.; and Tinsdeall,N.J.: 1998. Occupant Opinion of

Sound Insulation in Converted and Refurbished Dwellings in

England and the Implications for National Building

Regulations. Inter-noise 98, pp. 1727-1732, Christchurch,

New Zealand.

UKD-422

Groeneveld,Y.: 1980. Karakterisering En Beoordeling Van

Industrielawaai, Fase 3.a: De Telefonische Enquête.

(Characterization and Evaluation of Industrial Noise, Stage

3A: the Survey by Phone). IMG-TNO-D 45. Delft.

NET-257

Groeneveld,Y.: 1981. Characterization and Judgment of

Industrial Noise. Inter-noise 81, pp. 797-802.

NET-232

Groeneveld,Y.: 1984. CEC Joint Research Project: Effects of

Impulse Noises on Human Beings - The Main Results of the

Field Study in the Netherlands. 13th AICB Conference
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-117-

(Sarajevo, 1984), p. 1.6.1-1.6.6.

NET-255

Groeneveld,Y.: 1986. CEC Joint Research Project: Effects of

Impulse Noise on Human Beings: Results of Secondary

Analysis of Field Survey Data. [Intended As a Supplement to

the Main Report 85008]. Report No. 86013. Netherlands

Institute for Preventive Health Care - TNO, Leiden.

FRA-252 GER-253 IRE-254 NET-255

Groeneveld,Y.; and de Jong,R.G.: 1984. CEC Joint Research

Project "Effects of Impulse Noise on Human Beings" Main

Results of the Field Survey. [This Replaced Reports D-75

and D-78]. Report D91. Netherlands Institute for Preventive

Health Care - TNO, Leiden.

FRA-252 GER-253 IRE-254 NET-255

Groeneveld,Y.; and de Jong,R.G.: 1985a. CEC Joint Project on

Impulse Noise: Overall Results of the Field Survey. Internoise 85, pp. 905-908.

FRA-252 GER-253 IRE-254 NET-255

Groeneveld,Y.; and de Jong,R.G.: 1985b. CEC Joint Research

Project "Effects of Impulse Noise on Human Beings" the

Field Survey. NIPG-TNO publication 85008. Netherlands

Institute for Preventive Health Care - TNO, Delft.

FRA-252 GER-253 IRE-254 NET-255

Groeneveld,Y.; and Gerretsen,E.: 1984. Karakterisering En

Beoordeling Van Industrielawaai - Samenvattend Rapport.

(Characterization and Evaluation of Industrial Noise -

Summary Report). ICG report IL-HR-09-02, IMG-TNO

report D64. TNO, Delft.

NET-232

Groeneveld,Y.; van den Berg,R.; and de Jong,R.G.: 1985.

Effects of Impulse Noise on Human Beings; The Field Study

in the Netherlands. (Two Volumes)(Also Published As

Report GA-HR-04-01). IMG-TNO report D84. Netherlands

Institute for Preventive Health Care IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-255

Groeneveld,Y.; and Verboom,W.C.: 1981. Karakterisering En

Beoordeling Van Industrielawaai, Fase 3C: De Mongelinge

Enquête. (Characterization and Evaluation of Industrial

Noise, Phase 3C; the Face to Face Interview Study). IMGTNO D54. IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-232

Gros,E.; and Griefahn,B.: 1985a. Habituelle

Schlafqualitätseinschätzung Und Lärmbelästigung Bei

Anwohnern Von Straßen Mit Hoher Verkehrsdichte (Normal

Sleep Quality and Noise Disturbance to Residents in Streets

With High Traffic Density). Zeitschrift Für

Lärmbekämpfung, vol. 32, pp. 100-107.

GER-502

Gros,E.; and Griefahn,B.: 1985b. Subjektive Und Objektive

Ermüdungserscheinungen Als Folge Lärmgestörter

Nachtruhe (Subjective and Objective Tiredness As a

Consequence of Noise-Induced Sleep Disturbances).

Zeitschrift Für Arbeitswissenschaften, vol. 39, pp. 243-247.

GER-502

Gross,E.M.A.; and Sim,A.-B.: 1995. Aircraft Noise in Ku-RingGai: A Survey of Community Reaction.

AUL-456

Gross,E.M.A.; and Sim,A.-B.: 1997. Aircraft Noise in Sydney: 

Community Reactions in Areas Between 15 and 30 Km

North of the Airport. Proceedings of the 5th International

Congress on Sound and Vibration, vol. 5, pp. 2581-2592,

Adelaide.

AUL-456

Gross,E.M.A.; and Sim,A.-B.: 1998. Community Reaction to

Aircraft Noise in Sydney: A Pilot Study on the Monetary

Value of Activity Disturbances. Noise Effects '98: Noise as a

Public Health Problem (Seventh International Congress), pp.

511-514.

AUL-456

Guski,R.: 1985. Is There Any Need for Quiet Periods in

Discontinuous Noise? Inter-noise 85, pp. 985-988.

GER-134 GER-256

Guski,R.: 1996. Activity Interference and Noise Annoyance:

Contradictory Results and Possible Interpretations. Internoise 96, pp. 2357-2362, Liverpool, England.

GER-472

Guski,R.; Wichmann,U.; Rohrmann,B.; and Finke,H.O.: 1978.

Konstruktion Und Anwendung Eines Fragebogens Zur

Sozialwissenschaftlichen Untersuchung Der Auswirkungen

Von Umweltlärm. (Translation Available in: Construction

and Application of a Questionnaire for the Social Scientific

Investigation of Environmental Noise Effects. NASA-TM75492, May 1980). Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, vol. 9,

pp. 50-65.

GER-134

Haines,M.M.; and Stansfeld,S.A.: 2000. Measuring Annoyance

and Health in Child Social Surveys. Inter-noise 2000, pp.

1609-1614, Nice, France.

UKD-427

Haines,M.M.; Stansfeld,S.A.; Job,R.F.S.; and Berglund,B.:

1998. Chronic Aircraft Noise Exposure and Child Cognitive

Performance and Stress. Noise Effects '98: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Seventh International Congress), pp. 329-

335, Sydney, Australia.

UKD-427

Hall,F.L.: 1979. Living With the Barrier: The Community's

View. Report No. DOT-FH-11-9490. pp. 77-79, Federal

Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

CAN-121

Hall,F.L.; Birnie,S.E.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1978a. Noise Impact

Prediction: Some Comparisons of Community Response

Measures and of Noise Metrics. Inter-noise 78, pp. 601-604.

CAN-121

Hall,F.L.; Birnie,S.E.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1978b. The

Effectiveness of Shielding in Reducing the Adverse Impacts

of Highway Traffic Noise. 57th Annual Transportation

Research Board Meeting, McMaster Univ., Canada.

CAN-121
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-118-

Hall,F.L.; Birnie,S.E.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1979. Comparisons of

Response to Road Traffic Noise and Aircraft Noise. Dept.

Geography and Dept. Civil Engineering, McMaster Univ.,

Ontario.

CAN-168

Hall,F.L.; Birnie,S.E.; Taylor,S.M.; and Palmer,J.E.: 1981.

Direct Comparison of Community Response to Road Traffic

Noise and to Aircraft Noise. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 6, vol. 70,

pp. 1690-1698.

CAN-168

Hall,F.L.; Dixit,A.K.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1980. A Comparison of

Community Responses to Rail Yard, Road Traffic, and

Aircraft Noise. Inter-noise 80, pp. 799-802.

CAN-169 CAN-168

Hall,F.L.; Palmer,J.E.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1983. The Use of

Time-Above Measures to Predict Speech Interference From

Aircraft and Road Traffic Noise. Inter-noise 83, pp. 851-854.

CAN-121 CAN-168

Hall,F.L.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1976a. Community Response to

Noise in the Toronto-Hamilton Urban Corridor. Dept.

Geography, McMaster Univ., Canada.

CAN-121

Hall,F.L.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1976b. Predicting Community

Response to Surface Transportation Noise: Preliminary

Findings From the Hamilton-Toronto Urban Corridor.

Acoustics Noise Control in Canada, vol. 4, pp. 9-18.

CAN-121

Hall,F.L.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1977. Predicting Community

Response to Road Traffic Noise. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 52, pp.

387-399.

CAN-121

Hall,F.L.; and Taylor,S.M.: 1982. Reliability of Social Survey

Data on Noise Effects. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 4, vol. 72, pp.

1212-1221.

CAN-168

Hall,F.L.; Taylor,S.M.; and Birnie,S.E.: 1977. Community

Response to Road Traffic Noise. Dept. Geography,

McMaster Univ., Canada.

CAN-121

Hall,F.L.; Taylor,S.M.; and Birnie,S.E.: 1980. Spatial Patterns

in Community Response to Aircraft Noise Associated With

Non-Noise Factors. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 71, pp. 361-381.

CAN-168

Hall,F.L.; Taylor,S.M.; and Birnie,S.E.: 1983. Development of a

Model to Predict the Effects of Environmental Noise on

Residential Communities. Dept. Geography, McMaster

Univ., Hamilton, Ontario.

CAN-236

Hall,F.L.; Taylor,S.M.; and Birnie,S.E.: 1985. Activity

Interference and Noise Annoyance. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol.

103, pp. 237-252.

CAN-236

Hall,F.L.; Taylor,S.M.; Birnie,S.E.; Breston,B.; Gertler,M.; and

Moreau,R.: 1977. Final Report, Experience '77 Project:

Community Effects of Road Traffic Noise. Dept. of

Geography, McMaster Univ., Canada.

CAN-121

Hall,N.C.: 1969. Annoyance Caused by Railway Noise: Second

Phase Study Interim Report. Architectural Science Dept.,

Birmingham School of Architecture, England.

UKD-038

Hapuarachchi,K.P.: 1980. Investigation Into Validity of Kish

and Frankel's Conjectures on Complex Statistics by Using

Annoyance Data From Road Traffic and the Environment

Survey (M.Sc. Dissertation), Dept. of Social Statistics,

University of Southampton, England.

UKD-072

Harland,D.G.: 1977a. A Survey of Noise and Traffic Nuisance at

Homes in England. Institute of Acoustics, 1977 (Bath), pp.

12-1-1-12-1-5.

UKD-072

Harland,D.G.: 1977b. Exposure and Response to Traffic Noise.

Inter-noise 77, p. A-115-A-121.

UKD-072

Harland,D.G.; and Abbott,P.G.: 1977. Noise and Road Traffic

Outside Homes in England. TRRL Laboratory Rep. 770.

Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne,

England.

UKD-072

Hart,F.D.; Reiter,W.F.; and Royster,L.H.: 1972. A Community

Noise Problem/Resolution. Inter-noise 72, pp. 44-48.

USA-049

Haruta,C.; and Fujimoto,K.: 1988. An Investigation on the

Alarm Sound of Grade Crossings: The Effects on

Inhabitants. WESTPACIII (Western Pacific Acoustics

Conference III), pp. 1055-1058, Shanghai.

JPN-441

Hatfield,J.; Job,R.F.S.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 1998. Attitude-Mediated Reaction to Noise

Influences Physiological Responses: Evidence Supporting

Causality. Inter-noise 98, pp. 1163-1166, Christchurch, New

Zealand.

AUL-383

Hatfield,J.; Job,R.F.S.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 1999. General Sensitivity to Stimulation

Influences Sensitivity to the Psychological and Physiological

Effects of Noise Exposure. Inter-noise 99, pp. 1231-1236,

Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

AUL-383

Hatfield,J.; Job,R.F.S.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 2000. Personality Type and Psychological

Outcomes Among Noise Exposed Residents. Proceedings of

Westprac VII, pp. 919-924, Kumamoto, Japan.

AUL-383

Hawkins,M.M.: 1979a. Human Response to Domestic Appliance

Sound. Inter-noise 79, pp. 861-864.

UKD-160

Hawkins,M.M.: 1979b. Subjective Evaluation of Noise in Areas
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-119-

With Low Ambient Levels. Institute of Acoustics, Spring

1979..

UKD-160

Hawkins,M.M.: 1980. An Exploratory Study of Response To

Sound (Including Noise) Occurring in Rural Hampshire and

Wiltshire. ISVR Contract Report 80/11. Univ. of

Southampton, England.

UKD-160

Hayashi,A.: 1987. Study on Noise Exposure Level of Residence

in Urban Area and Reaction of Inhabitants in Different Land

Use. J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn., vol. 43, pp. 786-792.

JPN-294

Hayashi,A.: 2000. Reaction of Inhabitants to Environmental

Noise. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 5, pp. 2848-2851, Nice.

JPN-294

Hayashi,A.; Kuno,K.; Mishina,Y.; and Ikegaya,K.: 1987. Study

on Noise Environment of Residence and Reaction of

Inhabitants. Inter-noise 87, pp. 867-870.

JPN-294

Hayashi,A.; Kuno,K.; Oishi,Y.; Mishina,Y.; and Ikegaya,K.:

1988. Study on Environmental Quality Standards for Noise

Based on Equivalent Sound Level. Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Fifth International Congress), vol. 3: Performance,

Behaviour, Animal, Combined Agents and Community

Responses, pp. 201-207, Swedish Council for Building

Research, Stockholm.

JPN-294

Hayashi,C.; Hayashi,F.; Kodama,H.; and Kondo,S.: 1973.

Construction of PAANI by the Statistical and Psychological

Idea. Proceedings of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics,

1, vol. 21.

JPN-062

Hayashi,C.; Kondo,S.; and Kodama,H.: 1974. Psychological

Assessment of Aircraft Noise Index. 8th International

Congress on Acoustics, vol. 1, p. 121.

JPN-062

Hayashi,C.; Kondo,S.; and Kodama,H.: 1978. Psychological

Assessment of Aircraft Noise Index. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol.

63, pp. 815-822.

JPN-062

Hayden,B.; Whelan,B.; and Dillon,M.: 1984. CEC Joint

Research Project on Impulsive Noise. Field Study Report,

Volume 1- Main Report. Institute for Industrial Research

and Standards, Ireland.

IRE-254

Hayward,S.: 1999. Perceptions of Aircraft Noise From the

Bristol Noise, Sleep and Health Study. Centre for

Occupational and Health Psychology, Cardiff University,

Cardiff.

UKD-424

Hazard,W.R.: 1968. Community Reactions to Aircraft Noise.

Report No. NASA-SP-189. pp. 661-672, NASA,

Washington, D.C.

USA-022

Hazard,W.R.: 1971. Predictions of Noise Disturbance Near

Large Airports. J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 15, pp. 425-445.

USA-022 USA-032

Hede,A.J.: 1979. "Comment on Assessing Bias in Survey of

Symptoms Attributed to Noise" (Letter to Editor). J.Sound

Vib., 3, vol. 59, pp. 285-289.

UKD-111

Hede,A.J.: 1980. Psychological Scaling in the Assessment of

Subjective Reaction to Aircraft Noise. 10th International

Congress on Acoustics, pp. C2-7.5.

AUL-211 AUL-244

Hede,A.J.; and Bullen,R.B.: 1981. Community Reaction to

Noise From Hornsby Rifle Range. NAL Report 84. National

Acoustic Laboratories, Commonwealth Dept. of Health,

Canberra, Australia.

AUL-209

Hede,A.J.; and Bullen,R.B.: 1982a. Aircraft Noise in Australia:

A Survey of Community Reaction. NAL Report 88. National

Acoustic Laboratories, Commonwealth Dept. of Health,

Canberra, Australia.

AUL-210

Hede,A.J.; and Bullen,R.B.: 1982b. Community Reaction to

Noise From a Suburban Rifle Range. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol.

82, pp. 39-50.

AUL-209

Hede,A.J.; Bullen,R.B.; and Rose,J.A.: 1979. A Social Study of

the Nature of Subjective Reaction to Aircraft Noise. NAL

Report 79. National Acoustic Laboratories, Commonwealth

Dept. of Health, Canberra, Australia.

AUL-211

Hedges,B.: 1973. Road Traffic and the Environment:

Methodological Report. SCPR no. 230/2. Social and

Community Planning Research, London.

UKD-072

Hegner,A.; Möhler,U.; Prestele,G.; and Schümer-Kohrs,A.:

1996. Lärmsanierungsstudie. Pilotstudie an Der Strecke

München-Rosenheim-Freilassing. Akzeptanzbefragung

(Noise Cleaning. A Pilot Study on the MünchenRosenheim-Freilassing Route -- Acceptability

Study)(Preliminary Report). Möhler & Partners, Munich.

GER-471

Hegner,A.; Möhler,U.; Prestele,G.; and Schümer-Kohrs,A.:

1997. Lärmbelästigung Durch Schienenverkslärm Vor Und

Nach Dem Schienenschleifen. Pilotstsudie an Der Strecke

München-Rosenheim-Freilassing Akzeptanzbefragung.

(Noise Annoyance From Railway Noise Before and After

Rail Grinding: Pilot Study on the the München-RosenheimFreilassing --Acceptability Study). Report No. 103-370.

Möhler & Partners, Munich.

GER-471

Heimerl,G.; and Holzmann,E.: 1978. Ermittlung Der

Belästigung Durch Verkehrslärm in Abhängigkeit Von

Verkehrsmittel Und Verkehrsdichte in Einem

Ballungsgebiet. (Straßen-Und Eisenbahnverkehr)(Summary
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-120-

of This Work Is Translated As: Determination of Traffic

Noise Nuisance As a Function of Traffic Type and Density in

a Heavily Populated Area. NASA TM-75414).

Verkehrswissenschaftlichen Instituts an der Universität

Stuttgart.

GER-135

Hemingway,J.R.: 1975. The Assessment of Annoyance Due to

Train Noise. Presented at Canadian Acoustical Association

Symposium on Applied Acoustics, October 1975. Pollution

Control Branch, Ministry of the Environment, Ontario.

CAN-126

Hemingway,J.R.: 1976. The Assessment of Annoyance Due to

Train Noise. Acoustics and Noise Control in Canada, 4, vol.

4, pp. 13-20.

CAN-126

Hentenaar,F.: 1978. Industriegeluiden: Karakterisering En

Beoordeling Van Industrielawaai. Fase 2: Kwalitatief

Vooronderzoek. (Characterization and Evaluation of

Industrial Noise. Stage 2: Qualitative Pilot). IMG-TNO-D

38. IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-259

Hilton,D.A.; Huckel,V.; Steiner,R.; and Maglieri,D.J.: 1964.

Sonic-Boom Exposures During FAA Community-Response

Studies Over a Six-Month Period in the Oklahoma City

Area. NASA TN D-2539. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-012

Hiramatsu,K.; Matsui,T.; Miyakita,T.; Tokuyama,T.;

Ashimine,K.; Taira,K.; Osada,Y.; and Yamamoto,T.: 1998.

General Health Questionnaire Survey Around Kadena U.S.

Airfield in the Ryukyus - an Analysis of the Discriminant

Score and the Factor Score. Noise Effects '98: Noise as a

Public Health Problem (Seventh International Congress),

vol. 1, pp. 280-283.

JPN-445

Hiramatsu,K.; and Minoura,K.: 2000. Response to Urban

Sounds in Relation to the Residents' Connection With the

Sound Sources. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 4, pp. 2292-2296,

Nice, France.

JPN-506

Hiramatsu,K.; Minoura,K.; Matsui,T.; Miyakita,T.; Osada,Y.;

and Yamamoto,T.: 2000. An Analysis of the General Health

Questionnaire Survey Around Airports in Terms of

Annoyance Reaction. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 2089-2093, Nice,

France.

JPN-444 JPN-445

Hiramatsu,K.; Minoura,K.; Matsui,T.; Miyakita,T.; Taira,K.;

Osada,Y.; and Yamamoto,T.: 1998a. Annoyance and Its

Related Responses of the Residents Around Kadena U.S.

Airfield in the Ryukyus. Noise Effects '98: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Seventh International Congress), vol. 2, pp.

590-593.

JPN-444

Hiramatsu,K.; Minoura,K.; Matsui,T.; Miyakita,T.; Taira,K.;

Osada,Y.; and Yamamoto,T.: 1998b. Evaluation of the

Residential Environment by the Inhabitants Around an Air

Field in the Ryukyus. Inter-noise 98, pp. 1167-1170.

JPN-444

Hiramatsu,K.; Takagi,K.; Yamamoto,T.; and Yano,K.: 1987. A

Field Survey on Human Response to Aircraft Noise Around

the Osaka International Airport --A Method for Rating

Aircraft Noise in the Presence of Background Noise. Internoise 87, pp. 1121-1124.

JPN-293

Hiramatsu,K.; Yamamoto,T.; Taira,K.; Ito,A.; and Nakasone,T.:

1993. Response to Questionnaire on Health Around a

Military Airport. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp.

473-476, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

JPN-353

Holmquist,A.; Claesson,T.; and Tuvegran,I.: 1975. Ströningar

Från Motörvagen Genom Kungälv Triko II. (Disturbance

From the Motorway Through Kungälv: Phase II).

Länslåkarorganisationen, Göteborgs och Bohus Iän, Sweden.

SWE-100

Hood,R.A.: 1977. Annoyance and Noise From Road Traffic.

(Letter to the Editor). J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 53, pp. 455-457.

UKD-071

Horonjeff,R.D.; and Teffeteller,S.R.: 1980. Initial Study of the

Immediate Annoyance of Aircraft Noise As a Function of

Time of Day. NASA CR-159167. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-202

Hoshiyama,Y.; Kawaguchi,T.; Yoshida,Y.; Yamamoto,K.;

Chiba,T.; and Osada,T.: 1998. Community Response to

Traffic Noise Along Trunk Roads in Tokyo. Noise Effects

'98: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Seventh International

Congress), vol. 2, pp. 586-589.

JPN-496

Houot,H.: 1999a. Approche Géographique Des Nuisances

Sonores Urbaines - Méthodologie D'Aide à La Prise En

Compte Des Nuisances Sonores En Aménagement Urbain :

Application à La Ville De Besançon, (Geographical

Approach to Urban Noise Pollution) (Ph.D.), 1-326,

Université de Besançon.

FRA-394

Houot,H.: 1999b. Elaboration Et Utilisation D'Un Outil Pour La

Prise En Compte Du Bruit Dans L'Aménagement De

L'Espace Urbain : L'Exemple De Besançon"(Noise and

Urban Planning : a Decision Making Tool Used in

Besançon). Maîtrise du bruit dans l'environnement urbain,

pp. 81-94, l'Agence de l'Environnement et de la Maîtrise de

l'Energie et le Ministère de l'aménagement du territoire et de

l'environnement.

FRA-394

Houot,H.: 2000. Geographical Approach of Annoyance Due to

Noise Transportation. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 5, pp. 2844-

2847, Nice, France.

FRA-394

Huddart,L.; and Baughan,C.J.: 1993. The Effects of Traffic
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-121-

Changes on Perceived Nuisance. TRL Research Report.

Transport Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.

UKD-325 UKD-351

Hughes,T.L.; and Mabry,J.E.: 1976. The Relationship Between

Aircraft Noise Annoyance and Duration Above Specified

Noise Levels: Final Report. Contract No. DOT-FA75WAI559. Man-Acoustics and Noise, Seattle.

USA-085

Hume,K.I.; and Thomas,C.: 1993. Sleep Disturbance Due to

Aircraft Noise at a Rapidly Expanding Airport (Manchester

Airport). Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 563-566,

INRETS, Arcueil, France.

UKD-347

Humphrey,C.R.: 1973. Community Effects of Highways

Reflected by Property Values, Volume III: Annoyance With

Interstate Traffic in Suburbs. Report No. DOT-FH-11-7800.

Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

USA-070

Humphrey,C.R.; Bradshaw,D.A.; and Krout,J.A.: 1978. The

Process of Adaptation Among Suburban Highway

Neighbors. Sociology and Soc.Res., 2, vol. 62, pp. 246-266.

USA-103

Hutton,R.W.: 1978. Hovercraft Noise Annoyance in the

Southampton Terminal Area. ISVR Memo. 584. Institute of

Sound and Vibration Research, Southampton, England.

UKD-175

Imamura,Y.; Fujimoto,K.; Kim,B.-C.; and Nakamura,H.: 1991.

Acoustical Environment of Residential Area From the ViewPoint of Soundscape: Part II Relation Between Identity in

Residential Environment and Acoustical Environment in

Open Space. Korea-Japan Joint Symposium on Acoustics

(Commemoration of 10th Anniversary of ASK), pp. 414-

417.

JPN-438

Institut für Praxisorientierte Sozialforschung: 1980.

Störwirkungen Durch Den Lärm Der Kleinaviatik.

(Translation Available in: Annoyance Caused by Light

Aircraft Noise. NASA-TM-76533). Bundesamt für

Umweltschutz, Bern.

SWI-180

Institut Saobracajnog Fakulteta: 1981. Studija Uklapanja

Aerodroma "Split" u Okolinu Sa Aspekta Buke Koju

Generise Vazdusni Saboracaj Aerodroma. (Study of the

Environment of the Airport of Split From the Aspect of Air

Traffic Noise). Institut Saobracajnog Fakulteta, Beograd,

Yugoslavia.

YUG-234

IRT-CERN: 1976. Aspects De La Gêne Due Au Bruit De La

Circulation Routière: Résultats D'Enquêtes Sur 10 Sites.

(Parts of the Report Have Been Translated As: Aspects of

Annoyance Due to Noise of Road Traffic: Survey Results at

10 Sites. NASA TM-76561, May 1981. The Questionnaire

Has Been Translated and Is Available As: Study of the

Effects of Noise on Residents. NASA TM-76578, May

1981). IRT-CERN, Bron.

FRA-092

Ishiyama,T.: 1993. A Social Survey of Community Responses to

Road Traffic Noise. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp.

375-378, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

JPN-343

Ishiyama,T.: 1995. Factors Affecting Annoyance Caused by

Road Traffic Noise. Inter-noise 95, pp. 1009-1012, Newport

Beach, CA.

JPN-343

Itami City Airport Noise Pollution Abatement Agency: 1973.

Report on the Effects of Aircraft Noise Pollution From the

Osaka International Airport on People's Health and

Environment. Itami City Airport Noise Pollution Abatement

Agency, Itami, Japan.

JPN-163

Ito,A.; Hiramatsu,K.; Taira,K.; Nakasone,T.; and Yamamoto,T.:

1994. Health Effects on the Residents Due to Aircraft Noise

Around Kadena U.S. Airbase in the Ryukyus. Inter-noise 94,

pp. 247-250, Yokohama, Japan.

JPN-353

Izumi,K.: 1988. Recent Studies on Community Response to

Noise in Japan. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth

International Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour,

Animal, Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp.

209-214, Swedish Council for Building Research,

Stockholm.

JPN-294

Izumi,K.; Dankittikul,W.; Yamashita,T.; and Yano,T.: 1994.

Cross-Cultural Study on Community Response to Traffic

Noise (1): Surveys in Songkhla, Thailand and Tomakomai,

Japan. Inter-noise 94, pp. 1145-1148.

JPN-452 THA-327

Izumi,K.; and Yano,T.: 1990. A Survey on the Community

Response to Road Traffic Noise in the Mixed Noise

Environment. Inter-noise 90, pp. 279-282.

JPN-319

Izumi,K.; and Yano,T.: 1991. Community Response to Road

Traffic Noise: Social Surveys in Three Cities in Hokkaido.

J.Sound Vib., vol. 151, pp. 505-512.

JPN-453

Izumi,K.; Yano,T.; and Yamashita,T.: 1992. Social Surveys on

Road Traffic Noise in Hokkaido and Kyushu; CrossRegional Comparison of Community Response to Road

Traffic Noise. Part 1 (in Japanese, Abstract in English).

Journal of Archit.Plann.Environ.Engng, AIJ, 442, vol. Dec,

1992, pp. 1-7.

JPN-453

Jenkins,A.; Pahl,J.; Carroll,F.T.; Alyassini,N.; and Heller,S.:

1974. Community Response to Freeway Noise in Los

Angeles County. Final Report. Safety Systems Management

Research Center, University of Southern California, Los
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-122-

Angeles, California.

USA-088

Jenkins,M.A.; and Pahl,J.: 1975. Measurement of Freeway

Noise and Community Response. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 6, vol.

58, pp. 1222-1231.

USA-088

Jeon,J.Y.: 1996. Predicting the Effects of Noise Exposure on

Activity Disturbance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of

Korea, 4E, vol. 15, pp. 58-64.

AUL-461

Jeon,J.Y.; and Fricke,F.R.: 1995. Sensitivity to Road Traffic

Noise. Proceedings of Australian Acoustical Society

Conference, pp. 49-51, Perth.

AUL-461

Jeon,J.Y.; and Fricke,F.R.: 1998. Developing Sensitivity Criteria

for Road Traffic Noise in Residential Areas. Inter-noise 98,

pp. 1063-1066, Christchurch, New Zealand.

AUL-461

Job,R.F.S.; Bullen,R.B.; and Hede,A.J.: 1991. Community

Reaction to Impulsive Noise: A Study of an Army Artilery

Range. Inter-noise 91, pp. 891-894.

AUL-321

Job,R.F.S.; Cuthbert,P.; and Hatfield,J.: 2000. Personality and

Reaction to Noise: Field & Lab Studies. Proceedings of

Westprac VII, vol. 2, pp. 913-918, Kumamoto, Japan.

AUL-383

Job,R.F.S.; Hatfield,J.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 1998b. Relationship Between Reactions to

Aircraft Noise, Psychological Health and Sleep Disturbance.

Inter-noise 98, pp. 1079-1082, Christchurch, New Zealand.

AUL-383

Job,R.F.S.; Hatfield,J.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 1999a. Reaction to Combined Noise Sources: The

Roles of General and Specific Noise Sensitivities. Inter-noise

99, pp. 1189-1194, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

AUL-383

Job,R.F.S.; Hatfield,J.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 1999b. Reaction to Noise: The Roles of

Soundscape, Enviroscape, and Psychscape. Inter-noise 99,

pp. 1309-1314, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

AUL-383

Job,R.F.S.; Hatfield,J.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 2000a. Comparison of Reaction (Dissatisfaction,

Annoyance Etc.) To Aircraft Noise Among Shift Workers

and Non-Shift Workers. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 617-622, Nice,

France.

AUL-383

Job,R.F.S.; Hatfield,J.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 2000b. The Influence of Activity Disturbance on

Reaction the Sydney Aiport Health Study. Inter-noise 2000,

pp. 2098-2102, Nice, France.

AUL-383

Job,R.F.S.; Hatfield,J.; Peploe,P.; Carter,N.L.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 1998a. Negative Attitudes to Noise Exposure

Have a Pure Modifying Effect on Noise Reaction. Noise

Effects '98: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Seventh

International Congress), pp. 631-634.

AUL-383

Job,R.F.S.; and Hede,A.J.: 1989. Community Reaction to Noise

From Power Stations. Inter-noise 89, pp. 865-868.

AUL-306

Job,R.F.S.; Topple,A.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 1996a. Public Reactions to Changes in Noise

Levels Around Sydney Airport. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2419-

2424, Liverpool, England.

AUL-383

Job,R.F.S.; Topple,A.; Carter,N.L.; Peploe,P.; Taylor,R.; and

Morell,S.: 1996b. Test-Retest Reliability of Psychological

Scales (Sensitivity and Attitude) Related to Community

Reaction to Noise. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2413-2418, Liverpool,

England.

AUL-383

Jonah,B.A.; Bradley,J.S.; and Dawson,N.E.: 1981. Predicting

Individual Subjective Responses to Traffic Noise.

J.Appl.Psych., vol. 66, pp. 490-501.

CAN-120

Jonckheere,R.E.: 1984. Noise Assessment Around the Brussels

International Airport. Fourth Congress of the Federation of

Acoustical Societies of Europe, FASE 84, pp. 317-320.

BEL-288

Jonckheere,R.E.: 1987. Energy Descriptor or Duration

Descriptor for Aircraft Noise Exposure. Inter-noise 87, pp.

45-48.

BEL-288

Jonckheere,R.E.: 1988. Noise Exposure, Annoyance, Pollution

and Defensive Behaviour Correlations in Relation With

Aircraft Operations. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth

International Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour,

Animal, Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp.

327-332, Swedish Council for Building Research,

Stockholm.

BEL-288

Jonckheere,R.E.: 1989. Evaluation of Noise Exposure and

Annoyance Around Brussels Airport: Energy Descriptor

Versus Exceedance-Duration Descriptor. Noise Control

Engineering, 3, vol. 32, pp. 93-98.

BEL-288

Jonckheere,R.E.; and Swalens,Y.: 1981. Noise Survey in the

Vicinity of the Brussels International Airport. Inter-noise 81,

pp. 525-528.

BEL-288

Joncour,S.; Cailhau,D.; Gautier,P.E.; Champelovier,P.; and

Lambert,J.: 2000. Annoyance Due to Combined Noise

Sources. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 3545-3550, Nice, France.

FRA-393

Jones,C.J.; and Ollerhead,J.B.: 1992. Aircraft Noise and Sleep

Disturbance: A Field Study. Euro-Noise 92 (I.O.A. Vol. 14,

Part 4), pp. 119-127.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-123-

UKD-339

Jones,G.: 1971. A Survey of Annoyance From Motor Vehicle

Noise. BBN Rep. 2112.

USA-057

Jones,H.W.; Li,P.L.; and McKee,A.C.: 1973. Calgary Noise

Survey: The Noise Environment. Alberta Dept. of

Environment, Canada.

CAN-078

Jones,R.R.K.; and Waters,D.M.: 1974. 19??. Traffic Noise Near

Light Controlled Intersections. Dept. of Transport

Technology, Loughborough University of Technology,

Loughborough, England.

UKD-080

Jonsson,E.; Kajland,A.; Paccagnella,B.; and Sörensen,S.: 1969.

Annoyance Reactions to Traffic Noise in Italy and Sweden.

Arch.Environ.Health, vol. 19, pp. 692-699.

ITL-318 SWE-025

Jonsson,E.; and Sörensen,S.: 1970. Relation Between

Annoyance and Attitude to Source of Annoyance. Public

Health Reports, December 1970, vol. 85, pp. 692-699.

SWE-011

Jonsson,E.; and Sörensen,S.: 1973. Adaptation to Community

Noise--A Case Study. (Letter). J.Sound Vib., vol. 26, pp.

571-575.

SWE-026

Jonsson,E.; Sörensen,S.; Arvidsson,O.; and Berglund,K.: 1975.

Reliability of Forecasts of Annoyance Reactions.

Arch.Environ.Health, vol. 30, February 1975, pp. 104-106.

SWE-011 SWE-015 SWE-026

Josse,R.: 1969. La Gêne Causée Par Le Bruit Des Avions.

(Translation Available in: Disturbance Caused by Aircraft

Noise. NASA TM-75454, April 1980). Report no. 100.

Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment, Paris.

FRA-016

Jupp,V.R.; and Landon,L.: 1978. People and Noise in

Darlington. Dept of Behavioral Studies, Newcastle-UponTyne Polytechnic, England.

UKD-199

Jupp,V.R.; and Sutton,J.S.: 1976. Noise in Darlington. Dept. of

Behavioral Studies, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Polytechnic,

England.

UKD-132

Jurkovicová,J.; Sobotová,L.; Aghova,L.; and Voleková,J.: 2000.

Noise Exposure Risks in Two Noise Annoyance Surveys

After Ten Years. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 5, pp. 2852-2855,

Nice, France.

SLO-406

Kabuto,M.; and Kageyama,T.: 1994. Nighttime Road Traffic

Noise and Sleep Quality. Inter-noise 94, pp. 1041-1046.

JPN-499

Kajland,A.: 1970. Traffic Noise Investigation, in J. D.

Chalupnik (ed), Transportation Noises: A Symposium on

Acceptability Criteria. pp. 327-330, Univ. of Washington

Press, Seattle.

SWE-021

Kaku,J.: 1994. Community Response to Railway Noise -

Comparison of Social Survey Results Between Japan and

Other Countries. Inter-noise 94, pp. 121-124, Yokohama.

JPN-065

Kansai Toshi Soon Talsaku Iinkai: 1965. Survey Report on

Aircraft Noise in the Vicinity of Osaka Airport: Second

Report-Effect of Aircraft Noise (In Japanese). Kansai Toshi

Soon Talsaku Iinkai, Japan.

JPN-018

Karagodina,I.L.; Soldatkina,S.A.; Vinokur,I.L.; and

Klimukhin,A.A.: 1969. Effect of Aircraft Noise on the

Population Near Airports. Hygiene and Sanitation, 4-6, vol.

34, pp. 182-187.

USR-042

Kashima,N.; Tamura,A.; Shima,R.; and Sawada,J.: 1994. Social

Survey of Public Opinion on Sound Environment in

Yokohama. Inter-noise 94, pp. 1157-1160.

JPN-492

Kastka,J.: 1980. Noise Annoyance Reduction in Residential

Areas by Traffic Control Techniques. 10th International

Congress on Acoustics, pp. C2-12.2.

GER-246

Kastka,J.: 1981. Zum Einfluß Verkehrsberuhigender

Maßnahmen Auf Lärmbelastung Und Lärmbelästigung. (The

Influence of Traffic Calming on Traffic Noise and Its

Nuisance Effect). Zeitschrift Für Lärmbekämpfung, vol. 28,

pp. 25-30.

GER-246

Kastka,J.: 1983. An Empirical Model of Noise Annoyance

Reaction. 11th International Congress on Acoustics, LyonToulouse, Paris, vol. 3, pp. 191-194.

GER-164 GER-281

Kastka,J.; Borsch-Galetke,E.; Guski,R.; Krauth,J.; Paulsen,R.;

Schümer,R.; and Oliva,C.: 1995. Longitudinal Study on

Aircraft Noise Effects at Düsseldorf Airport 1981-1993. vol.

4, pp. 447-451, 15th International Congress on Acoustics,

Trondheim, Norway.

GER-372 GER-373 GER-473

Kastka,J.; and Buchta,E.: 1977. Analysis of Traffic Noise

Annoyance by Survey Method. Institute of Acoustics, May

1977, pp. 12-5-1-12-5-4.

GER-164

Kastka,J.; Buchta,E.; Paulsen,R.; and Ritterstaedt,U.: 1984.

Vergleichende Untersuchungen Zur Lärmbelästigung Von

Autobahnen Und Anderen Straßen. (Comparative Studies on

Noise Nuisance Emanating From Autobahns and Other

Highways). Number 432. Forschung Straßenbau und

Straßenverkehrstechnik, Bonn.

GER-164 GER-281 GER-282

Kastka,J.; Buchta,E.; Ritterstaedt,U.; Paulsen,R.; and Mau,U.:

1995. The Long Term Effect of Noise Protection Barriers on

the Annoyance Response of Residents. J.Sound Vib., vol.

184, pp. 823-852.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-124-

GER-363

Kastka,J.; Hall,G.H.; and Noack,R.H.: 1983. On the

Relationship of Highway Noise Annoyance and Distance to

Highways. Inter-noise 83, pp. 943-946.

GER-281

Kastka,J.; and Langdon,F.J.: 1985. CEC Joint Project on

Impulse Noise: Non-Acoustic Determinants of Impulse Noise

Annoyance. Inter-noise 85, pp. 901-904.

GER-253

Kastka,J.; Mau,U.; Muth,T.; and Siegmann,S.: 1996. Standings

and Results of the Research on Aircraft Noise - Longitudinal

Study at Dusseldorf Airport 1987-1995. Inter-noise 96, pp.

305-310, Liverpool, England.

GER-373 GER-374

Kastka,J.; and Noack,R.H.: 1987. On the Interaction of Sensory

Experience, Causal Attributive Cognitions and Visual

Context Parameters in Noise Annoyance, in H. S. Koelega

(ed), Environmental Annoyance: Characterization,

Measurement, and Control. pp. 345-362, Elsevier,

Amsterdam.

GER-291 SWI-312

Kastka,J.; Noack,R.H.; Mau,U.; Maas,P.; Conrad,U.;

Ritterstaedt,U.; and Hangartner,M.: 1986. Comparison of

Traffic-Noise Annoyance in a German and Swiss Town:

Effects of the Cultural and Aesthetic Context, in A. Schick,

H. Höge, and G. Lazarus-Mainka (eds.), Contributions to

Psychological Acoustics. pp. 313-340, Universität

Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

GER-291 SWI-312

Kastka,J.; and Paulsen,R.: 1979. Untersuchung Über Die

Subjektive Und Objektive Wirksamkeit Von

Schallschutzeinrichtungen Und Ihre Nebenwirkungen Auf

Die Anlieger. (An Investigation of the Subjective and

Objective Effectiveness of Noise Protection and Its

Effectiveness for the Requester). Institut für Hygiene,

Universität Düsseldorf.

GER-282

Kastka,J.; and Ritterstaedt,U.: 1984. Joint Research Project on

Effects of Impulse Noise on Human Beings -German Study -

(Final Report). Medizinisches Institut für Umwelthygiene,

University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf.

GER-253

Kessler,F.: 1985. Comments on "Re-Analysis of Data Presented

in 'Community Response to Blasting'" and "Reply to ReAnalysis of Data Presented in 'Community Response to

Blasting'". J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 78, p. 1905.

USA-206

Kim,B.-C.; and Fujimoto,K.: 1994. Amenity of Environment in

Residential Area on the Basis of Sound and Green. Internoise 94, pp. 993-996.

JPN-439

Kim,B.-C.; Fujimoto,K.; Imamura,Y.; and Nakamura,H.: 1991.

Acoustical Environment of Residential Area From the ViewPoint of Soundscape: Part I Relation Between Amenity in

Residential Environment and Acoustical Environment in

Open Space. Korea-Japan Joint Symposium on Acoustics

(Commemoration of 10th Anniversary of ASK), pp. 409-

413.

JPN-438

Kimura,S.; Inoue,K.; So,M.; and Fujisawa,K.: 1994. Analysis of

Occupancy Evaluation and Behavior As to Multi-Family

Dwelling Sound Environment. J.Archit.Plann.Environ.Eng.,

AIJ, 466, pp. 1-8.

JPN-377

Kirschner Associates: 1976. Results of an Opinion Survey

Concerning the Limited Operations of the Concorde

Supersonic Airplane at Dulles International Airport.

Contract Report. Federal Aviation Administration,

Washington, D.C.

USA-127

Klæboe,R.: 1998. The Combined Effects of Road Traffic -

Implications for Environmental Guidelines. Noise Effects

'98: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Seventh International

Congress), pp. 264-267.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Klæboe,R.: 2000. Analysing the Impacts of Combined

Environmental Effects - Can Structural Equation Models

(SEM) Be of Benefit ? Inter-noise 2000, Nice, France.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Klæboe,R.; and Fyhri,A.: 1997. Peoples Choice of Words for

Describing Noise Reactions. Inter-noise 97, pp. 1095-1098,

Budapest, Hungary.

NOR-401

Klæboe,R.; Kolbenstvedt,M.; Clench-Aas,J.; and Bartonova,A.:

1999. A Holistic Approach to Assess Traffic Measures. 8th

International Symposium "Transport and Air Pollution", pp.

573-580, Graz.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Klæboe,R.; Kolbenstvedt,M.; Clench-Aas,J.; and Bartonova,A.:

2000. Oslo Traffic Study Part 1: an Integrated Approach to

Assess the Combined Effects of Noise and Air Pollution on

Annoyance. Atmospheric Environment, vol. 34, pp. 4727-

4736.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Klæboe,R.; Kolbenstvedt,M.; Lercher,P.; and Solberg,S.: 1998.

Changes in Noise Reactions - Evidence for an Area-Effect?

Inter-noise 98, pp. 1133-1136, Christchurch, New Zealand.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Knall,V.; and Schümer,R.: 1983. The Differing Annoyance

Levels of Rail and Road Traffic Noise. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol.

87, pp. 321-326.

GER-192

Knowler,A.E.: 1971. The Second Noise and Social Survey

Around Heathrow, London Airport. 7th International

Congress on Acoustics, Budapest, vol. 2, August 18-26,

1971, pp. 525-528.

UKD-024

Ko,N.W.M.: 1975. Responses of Firemen to Aircraft and Traffic
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-125-

Noise. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 40, pp. 287-292.

HKG-208

Ko,N.W.M.; Chan,W.T.; and Kwan,A.S.H.: 1977. An

Elementary Study on the Responses of Firemen to Aircraft

Noise. J.Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2, vol. 4, pp.

354-374.

HKG-125

Ko,N.W.M.; Kwan,A.S.H.; and Chan,W.T.: 1976. Further

Investigation in the Responses of Firemen to Noise. J.Sound

Vib., 4, vol. 49, pp. 575-591.

HKG-125

Ko,N.W.M.; and Wong,V.L.P.: 1980. Responses to Road Traffic

Noise: A Socio-Economic Approach. (Letter to the Editor).

J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 68, pp. 147-152.

HKG-187

Kodama,H.: 1971. Psychological Effect of Aircraft Noise Upon

Inhabitants of an Airport Neighborhood. 17th International

Congress of Applied Psychology, Liege, Belgium.

JPN-046

Kolbenstvedt,M.: 1998a. Miljøbelastninger Og Levekår. Noen

Resultater Fra Levekårsundersøkelsen 1997 (Environmental

Stressors and Living Conditions. Some Results From the

1997 Survey of Living Conditions). 1104/98. Institute of

Transport Economics, Oslo.

NOR-405

Kolbenstvedt,M.: 1998b. Miljøkonsekvenser Av

Hovedvegomlegging Oslo Øst. Oppsummering Av Studier

19871996.(Environmental Consequences of Main Road

Diversion in Oslo East. Summary of Studies 1987-1996).

TØI Rapport 405/98. Transportøkonomisk institutt, Oslo.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Kolbenstvedt,M.; and Klæboe,R.: 1999. Environmental

Annoyances in Norway 1997. Inter-noise 99, pp. 1343-1346,

Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

NOR-405

Kolbenstvedt,M.; Klæboe,R.; Clench-Aas,J.; and Bartonova,A.:

1999. Environmental Impacts of Traffic Diversion Measures

in Oslo: Study Design and Main Results. 8th International

Symposium "Transport and Air Pollution", pp. 7-13, Graz.

NOR-398 NOR-400 NOR-401

Kondo,S.; Hayashi,C.; and Kodama,H.: 1975. A New Method

Suggested For Estimating the Psychological Effect of the

Aircraft Noise at an Airport. Inter-noise 75, pp. 433-436.

JPN-062

Kondo,S.; Hayashi,C.; and Kodama,H.: 1978. Annoyance of

Aircraft Noise in Relation to Background Noise. Acoustical

Society of America and The Acoustical Society of Japan

Joint Meeting, November 27 to December 1.

JPN-062

Kono,S.; and Sone,T.: 1988. Residents' Response to

Environmental and Neighborhood Noise. J.Sound Vib., vol.

127, pp. 573-581.

JPN-358

Kosten,C.W.; de Zwaan,G.W.; Steenbergen,M.H.;

Falkenhagen,C.A.F.; de Jonge,J.A.C.; and van Os,G.J.:

1967. Geluidhinder Door Vliegtuigen. (Translation

Available in: Aircraft Noise Abatement. NASA TT-F12,093). TNO, Delft.

NET-013

Koszarny,Z.; and Maziarka,S.: 1975. Uciazliwosc Halasow

Lotniczych w Najblizszym Otoczeniu Lotniska WarszawaOkecie. (Annoyance of Aircraft Noise in the Closest

Proximity of the Warszawa-Okecie Airport)(Translation

Available in: Aviation Noise Overload in the Immediate

Proximity of the Warsaw-Okecie Airport. NASA TM75892). Rocznik Panstwowego Zakladu Hygieny, 1, vol. 26,

pp. 1-9.

POL-198

Koszarny,Z.; Maziarka,S.; and Szata,W.: 1976. Wplyw Halasu

Samolotowego Na Micszkancow Rejonow Przylotniskowych

Lotniska Okecie w Warzawie. (Translation Available in: The

Effect of Airplane Noise on the Inhabitants of Areas Near

the Okecie Airport in Warsaw. NASA TM-75879). Rocznik

Panstwowego Zakladu Hygieny, 2, vol. 27, pp. 113-121.

POL-198

Koszarny,Z.; Szata,W.; and Gorynski,P.: 1979. Ekspozycja Na

Halas Kolejowy I Jego Uciazliwosc Dla Mieszkancow.

(Exposure to Railway Noise and Its Nuisance for the

Population). Rocznik Panstwowego Zakladu Hygieny, 4, vol.

30, pp. 387-395.

POL-184

Koszarny,Z.; Szata,W.; and Gorynski,P.: 1980. Weryfikacja

Kryteriow Oceny Halasu Kolejowego. (Verification of

Railroad Noise Criteria). Rocznik Panstwowego Zakladu

Hygieny, 2, vol. 31, pp. 209-216.

POL-184

Kragh,J.: 1977. Analyse Af Sammenhængen Mellem Reaktioner

På Vejtrafikstøj Og Fysiske Mål for Støjen. (Analysis of the

Correlation Between Reactions to Road Traffic Noise and

Physical Indices of the Noise). Report no. 5. Acoustical

Laboratory, Danish Academy of Technical Sciences, Lyngby.

DEN-075

Kryter,K.D.; Johnson,P.J.; and Young,J.R.: 1968. Psychological

Experiments on Sonic Booms Conducted at Edwards Air

Force Base (Final Report). Contract AF-49(638)-1758.

National Sonic Boom Evaluation Office, Arlington,

Virginia.

USA-299

Kuga,S.: 1989. On a Survey to Inquire Noise Environments

Among the Old Housing Districts in Tokyo (In Japanese).

Journal of INCE Japan, vol. 13, pp. 42-46.

JPN-504

Kumagai,M.; Kono,S.; Sone,T.; and Nimura,T.: 1975. A

Consideration on the Rating of Train Noise From Ordinary

Railways. Inter-noise 75, pp. 429-432.

JPN-064 JPN-101

Kuno,K.; Hayashi,A.; Oishi,Y.; and Mishina,Y.: 1988. A

Consideration of Environmental Quality Standards for Noise
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-126-

in Japan. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 127, pp. 565-572.

JPN-294

Kuno,K.; Mishina,Y.; Hayashi,A.; Oishi,Y.; Ikegaya,K.;

Zheng,D.; Cai,X.; and Chen,T.: 1987. Survey on

Environment of Residence in Urban Area -- Comparative

Study Between China and Japan. Inter-noise 87, pp. 871-

874.

CHI-457 JPN-294

Kuno,K.; Noro,Y.; Oishi,Y.; Mishina,Y.; and Hayashi,A.: 1997.

Analysis and Prediction of Personal Reaction to

Environmental Noise. Psychological Acoustics: Results of

the 7th Oldenburg Symposium

on Psychological Acoustics, pp. 205-220, Bibliotheks und

Informations System der Universitat Oldenburg, Oldenburg.

JPN-294

Kuno,K.; Ohara,K.; Takeda,K.; and Mishina,Y.: 1986.

Residential Noise Exposure and Reaction of Inhabitants

Around Roadside Area. 12th International Congress on

Acoustics, pp. C4-2.

JPN-294

Kuno,K.; Oishi,Y.; Hayashi,A.; Mishina,Y.; and Ikegaya,K.:

1985. Analysis and Classification of Residential Noise

Exposure Patterns. China-Japan Joint Symposium on

Acoustics, pp. 34-37.

JPN-294

Kuno,K.; Oishi,Y.; Mishina,Y.; Hayashi,A.; Zheng,D.; Cai,X.;

and Chen,T.: 1992. Study on Reaction of Inhabitants to

Environmental Noise (Nagoya-Beijing). 14th International

Congress on Acoustics, pp. E1-7, Beijing.

CHI-457 JPN-294

Kuno,K.; Oishi,Y.; Mishina,Y.; Hayashi,A.; Zheng,D.; Cai,X.;

and Chen,T.: 1993. Comparison of Noise Environment of

Residences in Nagoya, Japan and Beijing, China. Applied

Acoustics, vol. 40, pp. 153-167.

CHI-457 JPN-294

Kuno,K.; Omiya,M.; Mishina,Y.; Oishi,Y.; and Hayashi,A.:

1996. Measurements and Ratings of Environmental Noise in

Japan. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2037-2042.

JPN-294

Kuno,K.; Omiya,M.; Okumura,Y.; Hayashi,A.; Mishina,Y.; and

Oishi,Y.: 2000. Survey and Analysis of Dose-Response to

Community Noise. WESTPRACVII (Seventh Western

Pacific Regional Acoustics Conference), pp. 901-906.

JPN-294

Kuno,K.; Zheng,D.; Takeda,K.; Ikegaya,K.; and Mishina,Y.:

1984. Study on Noise Environment of Residence in Urban

Area. Inter-noise 84, pp. 953-958.

JPN-294

Kurra,S.: 1983. Analysis of Environmental Noise and

Determination of Highest Acceptable Noise Levels With

Regard to Noise Control in Istanbul. Inter-noise 83, pp. 671-

676.

TRK-283

Kurra,S.: 1988. Analysis of Traffic Noise Problems in

Developing Countries With Reference to a Case Study in

Residential Areas. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth

International Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour,

Animal, Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp.

215-221, Swedish Council for Building Research,

Stockholm.

TRK-283

Kurra,S.; Tamer,N.; and Rice,C.G.: 1995. Environmental Noise

Pollution Research Project Report. Istanbul Technical

University, Istanbul.

TRK-367

Kuwano,S.; Namba,S.; and Florentine,M.: 1996. Introduction to

Experiences With Efforts to Standardize Social Noise

Surveys. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2047-2052.

JPN-517 USA-518

Kühl,K.: 1980. Togstøjprojektet: Arbejdsrapport. Volume I and

II. Miljøstyrelsen, Copenhagen.

DEN-200

Lambert,J.; Champelovier,P.; and Vernet,I.: 1993. Annoyance

From High Speed Train Noise: An Exploratory Field Study.

Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 389-392, INRETS,

Arcueil, France.

FRA-336

Lambert,J.; Champelovier,P.; and Vernet,I.: 1996. Annoyance

From High Speed Train Noise: A Social Survey. J.Sound

Vib., 1, vol. 193, pp. 21-28.

FRA-396

Lambert,J.; Champelovier,P.; Vernet,I.; Annequin,C.; and

Baez,D.: 1994. Community Response to High Speed Train

Noise in France. Inter-noise 94, pp. 125-128, Yokohama,

Japan.

FRA-396

Lambert,J.; Champelovier,P.; Vernet,I.; Annequin,C.; and

Baez,D.: 1995. Impact Du Bruit Sur Les Riverians Du TGV

Atlantique (Impact of Noise on Residents From TGV

Atlantique). INRETS no. 196.

FRA-396

Lambert,J.; Maurin,M.; Boscher,F.; and Lebart,L.: 1988.

Perception and Sensitiveness of the French Population to

Road Traffic Noise. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth

International Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour,

Animal, Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp.

333-338, Swedish Council for Building Research,

Stockholm.

FRA-289

Lambert,J.; and Plouhinec,M.: 1985. Day and Night Annoyance:

A Comparison. Inter-noise 85, pp. 941-944.

FRA-197

Lambert,J.; and Simonnet,F.: 1980. Comportements Dans

L'Habitat Soumis Au Bruit De Circulation. (Translation

Available in: Patterns of Behavior in Lodgings Subject to

Traffic Noise. NASA TM-77750, 1984). Research Report no.

47. IRT-CERNE, Bron, France.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-127-

FRA-197

Lambert,J.; Simonnet,F.; and Vallet,M.: 1983. Patterns of

Behavior in Dwellings Exposed to Road Traffic Noise. Noise

as a Public Health Problem (Fourth International Congress),

pp. 1115-1124, Centro Ricerche e Studi Amplifon, Milano,

Italy.

FRA-197

Lambert,J.; Simonnet,F.; and Vallet,M.: 1984. Patterns of

Behavior in Dwellings Exposed to Road Traffic Noise.

J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 92, pp. 159-172.

FRA-197

Lambert,R.F.: 1971. Noise Survey and Abatement Procedures.

Project 00-122. Office of Research and Development,

Minnesota Dept. of Transportation, St. Paul, Minnesota.

USA-047

Lambert,R.F.: 1978. Experimental Evaluation of a Freeway

Noise Barrier. Noise Control Engineering, 2, vol. 11, pp. 86-

94.

USA-069

Lambert,R.F.; and Bouchard,T.J.: 1974. Experimental

Evaluation of a Freeway Noise Barrier: I-35W at Minnehaha

Creek, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Project 00-132. Office of

Research and Development, Minnesota Dept. of

Transportation, St. Paul, Minnesota.

USA-069

Lambert,S.R.; Blood,J.H.; Callen,M.A.; Germano,A.T.;

Quinn,D.H.; Neislar,R.; Sherrill,D.G.; and Bragdon,C.R.:

1973. College Park Noise Study. Georgia Institute of

Technology, Atlanta.

USA-068

Lamure,C.; and Bacelon,M.: 1967. La Gêne Due Au Bruit De

La Circulation Automobile: Une Enquête Auprès De

Riverains D'Autoroutes. (Translation Available in: The

Nuisance Due to the Noise of Automobile Traffic: An

Investigation in the Neighborhoods of Freeways. NASA TM75812). Cahiers du Centre Scientifique et Technique du

Bâtiment 88. Centre Scientifique et Technique du Bâtiment,

Paris.

FRA-019

Landon,L.: 1976. Noise in Darlington: Processing and Analysis

of Results. Newcastle-Upon-Tyne Polytechnic, England.

UKD-132

Lang,J.: 1975. Über Den Zusammenhang Zwischen Objektiven

Meßergebnissen Und Subjectiv Empfundener Störung Von

Verkehrslärm. (Translation Available in: On the Correlation

Between Objective Measurements and Subjectively Felt

Disturbance From Traffic. NASA TM-75486).

Berufspaedagogisches Institut des Vienna.

AUS-093

Lang,J.: 1976. Zusammenhang Zwischen Objektiven

Meßergebnissen Und Subjektiv Empfundener Störung Von

Verkehrslärm. (Relation Between Objective Experimental

Results and Subjective Experienced Annoyance From Traffic

Noise). 9th AICB Congress, Budapest.

AUS-093

Lang,J.: 1977. Criteria for Road Traffic Noise Due to Subjective

Response. 9th International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid,

4-9 July 1977, p. 29.

AUS-093

Lang,J.: 1978. Lärmbelastung An Strassen, Wirksamkeit Und

Kosten Von Lärmschutzmassnahmen. (Translation

Available in: Noise Levels Near Streets, Effectiveness and

Cost Abatement Measures. NASA TM-75814). pp. 156-162.

AUS-093 AUS-178

Lang,J.: 1980. Lärmbelastung An Straßen, Wirksamkeit Und

Kosten Von Lärmschutzmaßnahmen. Report 150.

Bundesministerium für Bauten und Technik

Straßenforschung, Vienna, Austria.

AUS-178

Langdon,F.J.: 1975. Noise Nuisance Caused by Road Traffic In

Residential Areas. Inter-noise 75, pp. 395-398.

UKD-071

Langdon,F.J.: 1976a. Noise Nuisance Caused by Road Traffic in

Residential Areas: Part III. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 49, pp. 241-

256.

UKD-071

Langdon,F.J.: 1976b. Noise Nuisance Caused by Road Traffic in

Residential Areas: Parts I, II. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 47, pp.

243-282.

UKD-071

Langdon,F.J.: 1977a. Noise Nuisance From Road Traffic In

Residential Areas. 9th International Congress on Acoustics,

Madrid, 4-9 July 1977, p. 32.

UKD-071

Langdon,F.J.: 1977b. The Effects of Traffic Noise in Urban

Areas. Institute of Acoustics, May 1977, p. 12.2.1-12.2.3.

UKD-071

Langdon,F.J.: 1978a. Effects of Road Traffic Noise. Institute of

Acoustics, October 1978, pp. 18-2-1-18-2-4.

UKD-071

Langdon,F.J.: 1978b. Monetary Evaluation of Nuisance From

Road-Traffic Noise: An Exploratory Study. Environment and

Planning A., vol. 10, pp. 1015-1034.

UKD-071

Langdon,F.J.: 1980. Reliability of Estimates of Annoyance With

Road Traffic Noise. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Third

International Congress), ASHA Report 10, pp. 567-570,

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville,

Maryland.

UKD-030

Langdon,F.J.; and Buller,I.B.: 1977a. Party Wall Insulation and

Noise From Neighbors. J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 55, pp. 495-

507.

UKD-071 UKD-119

Langdon,F.J.; and Buller,I.B.: 1977b. Road Traffic Noise and

Disturbance to Sleep. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 50, pp. 13-28.

UKD-071

Langdon,F.J.; Buller,I.B.; and Scholes,W.E.: 1981. Noise From
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-128-

Neighbors and the Sound Insulation of Party Walls in

Houses. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 79, pp. 205-228.

UKD-220

Langdon,F.J.; Buller,I.B.; and Scholes,W.W.: 1983. Noise From

Neighbors and the Sound Insulation of Party Floors and

Walls in Flats. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 88, pp. 243-270.

UKD-233

Langdon,F.J.; and Griffiths,I.D.: 1982. Subjective Effects of

Traffic Noise Exposure, II: Comparisons of Noise Indices,

Response Scales, and the Effects of Changes in Noise Levels.

J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 82, pp. 171-180.

UKD-157 UKD-268 GER-282

Large,J.B.; and Ludlow,J.E.: 1975. Community Reaction To

Construction Noise. Inter-noise 75, pp. 13-20.

UKD-074

Large,J.B.; and Ludlow,J.E.: 1976. Community Reaction to

Noise From a Construction Site. Noise Control Engineering,

pp. 59-65.

UKD-074

Large,J.B.; and Ludlow,J.E.: 1977. Community Response to

Concorde Flights Round London (Heathrow) Airport-Noise

Exposure Prediction Methodology. Port Authority of New

York and New Jersey.

UKD-130

Larsen,L.E.; and Bendtsen,H.: 2001. Perception of Noise

Reduction by Porous Asphalt. Euronoise 2001.

DEN-387

Lawrence,A.B.; and Putra,A.: 1989. The Combined Effect of

Road Traffic and Aircraft Noise on People. Inter-noise 89,

pp. 891-894.

AUL-307

Lawson,B.R.; and Walters,D.: 1973. The Effects of a New

Motorway on an Established Residential Area. Dept. of

Architectural Planning and Urban Studies, Univ. of Aston,

Birmingham, England.

UKD-073

Lee,S.-W.: 1985. A Study on the Evaluation Model of

Environmental Noise Impacts in Urban Residential Areas.

pp. 1-144.

KOR-475

Lee,S.-W.; Lee,K.-H.; and Cha,I.-W.: 1985. A Subjective

Response Model for the Traffic Noise in Urban Residential

Area. WESTPAC II (Second Western/Pacific Regional

Acoustics Conference), pp. 96-101, Hong Kong.

KOR-475

Leonard,S.; and Borsky,P.N.: 1973. A Causal Model for

Relating Noise Exposure, Psycho-Social Variables and

Aircraft Noise Annoyance. International Congress on Noise

as a Public Health Problem, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May

13-18 1973. USEPA 550-9-008, pp. 691-705, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

USA-059

Lercher,P.: 1992. Auswirkungen Des Straßenverkehrs Auf

Lebensqualität Und Gesundheit (Effects of Road Traffic on

Quality of Life and Health). Abteilung Sozialmedizin,

Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck.

AUS-329

Lercher,P.: 1996. Road Traffic Noise, Self Medication, and

Prescriptions: a Community Study. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2171-

2176, Liverpool, England.

AUS-329

Lercher,P.: 1998. Deviant Dose-Response Curves for Traffic

Noise in 'Sensitive Areas'? Inter-noise 98, pp. 1141-1144,

Christchurch, New Zealand.

AUS-329

Lercher,P.: 2001. Dokumentation Der Zusatzerhebungen Zur

Uve Der Eisenbahnachse Brenner Zulaufstrecke Nord

Unteres Inntal Für Den Teilbereich Hygiene Und

Gesundheit. (Documentation for Additional Required

Studies for the Environmental Assessment of the New

Brenner Rail Track, North Part, Lower Inn Valley With

Respect to Hygiene and Health). Innsbruck.

AUS-487 AUS-488 AUS-521

Lercher,P.; Brauchle,G.; Kofler,W.; Widmann,U.; and Meis,M.:

2000. The Assessment of Noise Annoyance in

Schoolchildren and Their Mothers. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 4,

pp. 2318-2322, Nice, France.

AUS-488

Lercher,P.; Brauchle,G.; and Widmann,U.: 1999. The

Interaction of Landscape and Soundscape in the Alpine Area

of the Tyrol: An Annoyance Perspective. Inter-noise 99, pp.

1347-1350, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

AUS-487

Lercher,P.; and Widmann,U.: 1993. Factors Determining

Community Response to Road Traffic Noise. Noise and Man

'93: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth International

Congress), vol. 2, pp. 201-204, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

AUS-329

Lercher,P.; Widmann,U.; and Kofler,W.: 2000. Transportation

Noise and Blood Pressure: the Importance of Modifying

Factors. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 4, pp. 3071-3075, Nice,

France.

AUS-521

Levein,B.; and Åhrlin,U.: 1988. Annoyance Caused by Shooting

Range Noise. J.Sound Vib., vol. 127, pp. 589-592.

SWE-360

Levine,N.: 1981. The Development of an Annoyance Scale for

Community Noise Assessment. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 74, pp.

265-279.

USA-221 USA-822

Liepert,M.; Hegner,A.; Möhler,U.; Schreckenberg,D.; SchümerKohrs,A.; and Schümer,R.: 1999. Lärmbelästigung Durch

Schienenverkslärm Vor Und Nach Dem Schienenschleifen.

Zwischenbericht Zur Hauptstudie Akzeptanzbefragung. 

(Noise Annoyance From Railway Noise Before and After

Rail Grinding -- Acceptability Study). Report Nr. 101-707.

Möhler & Partners, Munich.

GER-479
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-129-

Lingen,W.K.; and Voorn,W.J.M.: 1979. Het Proefprojet Voor

Geluidwerende Voorzieningen Aan Woningentegen

Vliegtuiglawaai in Relatie Met Sanering. (Test Investigation

into the Application of Noise Abating Measures in Houses

Against Airplane Noise). Report LL-HR-11-01.

Interdepartementale Commissie Geluidhinder,

Leidschendam, Netherlands.

NET-115 NET-149

Loeb,M.; and Moran,S.V.: 1977. Annoyance by Aircraft Noise

and Fear of Overflying Aircraft in Relation to Attitudes

Toward the Environment and Community. Technical Report

7701. Performance Research Laboratory, Univ. of Kentucky,

Louisville.

USA-129

Lopez Barrio,I.; and Carles,J.L.: 1993. Subjective Response to

Traffic Noise: The Importance Given To Noise Environment

In Choosing A Place Of Residence. Noise and Man '93:

Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth International

Congress), vol. 2, pp. 205-208, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

SPA-330

Ludlow,J.E.: 1973. A Noise Survey at an Underpass

Construction Site. Institute of Physics, Acoustics Group

Meeting, February 8 1973, United Kingdom..

UKD-074

Ludlow,J.E.: 1976. A Survey of the Effects of Noise Around a

Construction Site. ISVR Memo 553. Univ. of Southampton,

England.

UKD-074

Mabry,J.E.: 1982. A Study of General Aviation Community

Noise Impact and Annoyance. NASA CR-165945. NASA,

Washington, D.C.

USA-205

Mackie,A.M.; and Davies,C.H.: 1981. Environmental Effects of

Traffic Changes. TRRL Report LR 1015. Transport and

Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.

UKD-268

Mackie,A.M.; and Forster,M.: 1978. Environmental Effects of

Traffic in Ludlow, Salop. TRRL Report SR 245. Transport

and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.

UKD-268

Mackie,A.M.; and Griffin,L.J.: 1977. Before and After Study of

the Environmental Effects of Tring By-Pass. TRRL Report

LR 589. Transport and Road Research Laboratory,

Crowthorne, England.

UKD-268

Mackie,A.M.; and Griffin,L.J.: 1978a. Environmental Effects of

By-Passing Small Towns - Case Studies at Boughton,

Dunkirk and Bridge. TRRL Report SR 349. Transport and

Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.

UKD-268

Mackie,A.M.; and Griffin,L.J.: 1978b. Environmental Effects of

Traffic: Case Study at Mere, Wiltshire. TRRL Report SR

428. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne,

England.

UKD-268

Maglieri,D.J.; and Sothcott,V.E.: 1990. Summary of Sonic

Boom Rise Times Observed During FAA Community

Response Studies Over a 6-Month Period in the Oklahoma

City Area. CR 4277. NASA, Washington D.C.

USA-012

Makinson,C.: 1979. Sleep Disturbance: Technical Report.

Project 560. Social and Community Planning Research,

London.

UKD-182

Mallebrera,M.; Romero,J.; Giminez,A.; Marin,A.; and

Sanchis,A.: 2000. Annoyance Produced by the Noise of the

Airport of Altet-Alicante, on the Cities of Altet,

Torremolinos, and Elche. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 2, pp. 1375-

1378, Nice, France.

SPA-411

MAN-Acoustics and Noise: 1975. City of Portland and

Multnomah County System Noise Management Program.

MAN-Acoustics and Noise, Seattle.

USA-089

Manglano,J.L.; Gaja,E.; Estellés,H.; and Belmar,F.: 1984.

Community Response to Traffic Nose in Valencia City.

Inter-noise 84, pp. 725-728.

SPA-316

Martin,R.; Rohrmann,B.; and Finke,H.O.: 1973. PsychoAcoustic Results of an Interdisciplinary Study on Effects of

Aircraft Noise on Man. Inter-noise 73, pp. 289-297.

GER-034

Mather,C.E.: 1971. A Study of Aircraft Noise in an Urban Area.

Physical Environment Rep. PR4. Dept. of Architectural

Science, Univ. of Sydney, Sydney.

AUL-036

Matsui,T.; Nakada,M.; Hiramatsu,K.; Taira,K.; Osada,Y.; and

Yamamoto,T.: 1998. Monitoring and Analysis of Aircraft

Noise Exposure Around Military and Civil Airfields in the

Ryukyus. Inter-noise 98, pp. 917-920.

JPN-444 JPN-445

Mauer,M.C.: 1968. Inwoners In Die Omgewing Van Lughawens

Se Reaksie Op En Opinies Oor Vliegtuiggeraas. (Reactions

to and Opinions of Residents in the Vicinity of Airports to

Aircraft Noise). Nasionale Instituut Vir Personeelnavorsing

Wetenskaplike En Nywerheidnavorsingsraad, Johannesburg,

South Africa.

SAF-028

Maurin,M.: 1996. Some Ways to Process Raw Data Coming

From Community Noise Surveys. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2537-

2540, Liverpool.

FRA-364

Maurin,M.; and Lambert,J.: 1990. Exposure of the French

Population to Transport Noise. Noise Control Engineering,

vol. 35, pp. 5-18.

FRA-289 FRA-323

Maurin,M.; Lambert,J.; and Alauzet,A.: 1988. Enquête

Nationale Sur Le Bruit Des Transports En France. (National
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-130-

Study of Transportation Noise in France). INRETS Report N

71. Laboratoire Energie Nuisances (LEN), Bron.

FRA-289 FRA-323

Maurin,M.; Lambert,J.; Alauzet,A.; and Chapuy,P.: 1988.

French Population Exposure to Transport Noise: Current

Situation and Future Outlook. Inter-noise 88, pp. 1293-1296.

FRA-289

May,D.N.: 1971a. Startle Due to Sonic Booms Heard Outdoors

As Functions of Overpressure and Rise Time. (Letter to the

Editor). J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 18, pp. 144-145.

GER-037

May,D.N.: 1971b. The Loudness of Sonic Booms Heard

Outdoors As Simple Functions of Overpressure and Rise

Time. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 18, pp. 31-43.

GER-037

May,D.N.: 1972. Sonic Boom Startle: A Field Study in Meppen,

West Germany. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 24, pp. 337-347.

GER-037

McColl,W.: 1979. Youngmann Highway Experimental Noise

Abatement Project: Social and Attitudinal Survey. DOT-FH11-9490. New York State Dept. of Transportation.

USA-154

McEntagart,D.J.: 1980. Sample Design For Community Noise

Surveys in Rural Areas (M.Sc. Dissertation), Dept. of Social

Statistics, Univ. of Southampton, England.

UKD-160

McKennell,A.C.: 1963. Aircraft Noise Annoyance Around

London (Heathrow) Airport. S.S.337. The Government

Social Survey, Central Office of Information, London.

UKD-008

McKennell,A.C.: 1965. Correlational Analysis of Survey Data.

Sociological Review, vol. 13, pp. 157-181.

UKD-008

McKennell,A.C.: 1969. Methodological Problems in a Survey of

Aircraft Noise Annoyance. The Statistician, 1, vol. 19, pp. 1-

29.

UKD-008

McKennell,A.C.: 1970. Noise Complaints and Community

Action, in J. D. Chalupnik (ed), Transportation Noises: A

Symposium on Acceptability Criteria. pp. 228-244,

University of Washington Press, Seattle.

UKD-008

McKennell,A.C.: 1973. Psycho-Social Factors in Aircraft Noise

Annoyance. International Congress on Noise as a Public

Health Problem, May 13-18, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia.

USEPA 550-9-73-008, pp. 627-644, U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Washington D.C.

UKD-008

McKennell,A.C.: 1977. Community Response to Concorde

Flights Round London (Heathrow) Airport. Social and

Community Planning Research, London.

UKD-130

McKennell,A.C.: 1978. Reactions to Concorde Flights by

Heathrow Residents. Inter-noise 78, pp. 573-578.

UKD-130

McKennell,A.C.: 1980. Annoyance From Concorde Flights

Round Heathrow. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Third

International Congress), ASHA Report 10, pp. 562-566,

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville,

Maryland.

UKD-130

McKennell,A.C.; and Hunt,E.A.: 1966. Noise Annoyance in

Central London. S.S.332. The Government Social Survey,

Central Office of Information, London.

UKD-009

McLean,E.K.; and Tarnopolsky,A.: 1977. Noise, Discomfort

and Mental Health. A Review of the Socio-Medical

Implications of Disturbance by Noise. Psychological

Medicine, vol. 7, pp. 19-62.

UKD-111

Meloni,T.; and Fischer,F.: 2000. Factors Moderating the Effect

of Noise Barriers. Noise-Con 2000.

SWI-469

Mid-Continent Surveys: 1972. Airport Area Adults' Attitudes

Toward Airport Noise and Airport Location: A Public

Opinion Poll. Mid-Continent Surveys, Inc., Minneapolis,

Minnesota.

USA-212

Miedema,H.M.E.: 1987. Annoyance From Combined Noise

Sources, in H. S. Koelega (ed), Environmental Annoyance:

Characterization, Measurement. pp. 313-320, Elsevier,

Amsterdam.

NET-255 FRA-252 GER-253 IRE-254 NET-240 NET-276

Miedema,H.M.E.: 1992. Response Functions for Environmental

Noise in Residential Areas. NIPG Report Nr. 92.021. NIPGTNO, Leiden.

NET-362

Miedema,H.M.E.; and van den Berg,R.: 1985. Hinder Door

Geluid Van Tram- En Wegverkeer. (Noise Nuisance Caused

by Trams and Road Traffic). Report GA-HR-08-02.

Ministerie van Volkshuisvesting, Ruimtelijke Ordening en

Milieubeheer (Ministry of Housing, Physical Planning and

Environment), the Hague.

NET-276

Miedema,H.M.E.; and van den Berg,R.: 1988. Community

Response to Tramway Noise. J.Sound Vib., vol. 120, pp.

341-346.

NET-276

Miedema,H.M.E.; and Vos,H.: 1998. Exposure-Response

Relationships for Transportation Noise. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 6,

vol. 104, pp. 3432-3445.

MIL Research: 1971. Second Survey of Aircraft Noise

Annoyance Around London (Heathrow) Airport. HMSO,

London.

UKD-024

Miljøstyrelsen: 1982. Reaktioner På Togstøj: En Analyse Af

Interviews Blandt Beboere Langs Danske Jernbaner.

(Reactions to Railway Noise: An Analysis of a Social Survey
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-131-

Among People Living Along Danish Railways).

Environmental Projects Report No. 42. Miljø-Projekter,

Miljøstyrelsen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

DEN-200

Minnesota Dept.of Transportation: 1971. Highway Traffic Noise

Survey and Analysis. Project 00-122. Minnesota Dept. of

Transportation.

USA-047

Minnesota Dept.of Transportation: 1980. Minneapolis-St. Paul

Metropolitan Area Noise Barrier Attitude Study. Minnesota

Dept. of Transportation, District Nine Planning.

USA-155

Minoura,K.; and Hiramatsu,K.: 1998. An Acoustic-Ecological

Survey on Community Response to Residential and Sonic

Environment in an Area of Traditional Textile Industry.

Inter-noise 98, vol. 2, pp. 1151-1156.

JPN-507

Minoura,K.; and Hiramatsu,K.: 2000. Comparing Soundscapes

Based on Free Response Questionnaire Surveys. Inter-noise

2000, vol. 5, pp. 2829-2832, Nice, France.

JPN-505 JPN-507 JPN-508

Minoura,K.; Hiramatsu,K.; Matsui,T.; Takagi,K.; and Oi,K.:

1997. An Intensive Survey on Community Response to Sonic

Environment in a Residential-Industrial Mixed Use Area.

J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 205, pp. 481-492.

JPN-505

Minoura,K.; Matsui,T.; Miyakita,T.; Taira,K.; Hiramatsu,K.;

Osada,Y.; and Yamamoto,T.: 1998. Sleep Disturbance

Reported Around Kadena U.S. Airfield in the Ryukyus.

Noise Effects '98: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Seventh

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 463-466.

JPN-444

Mirowska,M.: 2000. Evaluation of Low-Frequency Noise in

Dwellings. New Polish Recommendations. Proceedings of

9th Internation Meeting: Low Frequency Noise and

Vibration, pp. 117-124, Aalborg, Denmark.

POL-477

Mirowska,M.; and Mróz,E.: 1999. Wp»Yw D»Ugotrwa»Ego

Oddzia »Ywania Ha»Asu Niskocz"StotliwoÑiowego Na

Zdrowie Mieszka 1⁄2Ców w Ñwietle Bada1⁄2 Ankietowych

(Influence of Long-Term Effect of Low Frequency Noise on

Health of Dwellers in Light of Questionnaire

Investigation)(In Polish). Building Research Institute -

Quarterly, 1, vol. 109, pp. 55-62.

POL-477

Mirowska,M.; and Mróz,E.: 2000. Effect of Low-Frequency

Noise at Low Levels on Human Health in Light of

Questionnaire Investigation. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 5, pp.

2809-2812, Nice, France.

POL-477

Mirowska,M.; Mróz,E.; and Nidzinska-Mróz,W.: 1998. The

Influence of Low Frequency Noise on the Health of Exposed

Inhabitants. Noise Control '98, vol. 5, pp. 289-294, Central

Institute for Labour Protection, Warsaw.

POL-477

Mitsuda,Y.; and Kimura,S.: 1980. Evaluation of Inhabitant

Noise in Multifamily Dwellings Using TNEL. 10th

International Congress on Acoustics, pp. C1-3.5.

JPN-376

Miyahara,K.: 1988. An Investigation of Secular Change of

Social Response to Aircraft Noise. Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Fifth International Congress), vol. 5: New

Advances in Noise Research Part II, pp. 415-420, Swedish

Council for Building Research, Stockholm.

JPN-509

Miyakita,T.; Matsui,T.; Ito,A.; Tokuyama,T.; Taira,K.;

Hiramatsu,K.; Osada,Y.; and Yamamoto,T.: 1998a. General

Health Questionnaire Survey Around Kadena U.S. Airfield

in the Ryukyus - an Analysis of the 12 Scale Scores. Noise

Effects '98: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Seventh

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 608-612.

JPN-353 JPN-445

Miyakita,T.; Minoura,K.; Matsui,T.; Ito,A.; Tokuyama,T.;

Hiramatsu,K.; Taira,K.; Osada,Y.; and Yamamoto,T.:

1998b. Is Residential Sound-Proofing an Effective Measure

in Reducing the Effects of Aircraft Noise? Inter-noise 98, pp.

925-928, Christchurch, New Zealand.

JPN-444

Monkman,D.J.: 1983. 1982 Manchester Night Noise Study:

Tabulations of Noise Measurement Results. DR

Communication 8307. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-224

Moran,S.V.; Gunn,W.J.; and Loeb,M.: 1981. Annoyance by

Aircraft Noise and Fear of Overflying Aircraft in Relation to

Attitudes Toward the Environment and Community.

J.Auditory Res., vol. 21, pp. 217-225.

USA-129

Morton-Williams,J.: 1983. 1982 Manchester Night Noise Study:

Methodological Report. Social and Community Planning

Research, London.

UKD-224

Morton-Williams,J.; Hedges,B.; and Fernando,E.: 1978. Road

Traffic and the Environment. Social and Community

Planning Research, London.

UKD-072

Möhler,U.: 1988. Community Response to Railway Noise: A

Review of Social Surveys. J.Sound Vib., vol. 120, pp. 321-

332.

SWE-228 GER-192

Möhler,U.; Hegner,A.; Schümer,R.; and Schümer-Kohrs,A.:

1997. Effects of Railway-Noise Reduction on Annoyance

After Rail-Grinding. Inter-noise 97, pp. 1021-1026,

Budapest, Hungary.

GER-471

Möhler,U.; and Knall,V.: 1983. Correlation of Acoustic Indices

and Disturbance Reaction Factors on Railway and Road

Traffic Noise. Inter-noise 83, pp. 989-992.

GER-192
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-132-

Möhler,U.; and Liepert,M.: 2000. Differences in the Annoyance

Between Rail and Road Traffic Noise in Relation to the

Acoustic Situation. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 4088-4093, Nice,

France.

GER-470 GER-480

Möhler,U.; Liepert,M.; Schümer,R.; and Griefahn,B.: 2000.

Differences Between Rail and Road Traffic Noise. J.Sound

Vib., 3, vol. 231, pp. 853-864.

GER-470 GER-480

Möhler,U.; Liepert,M.; Schümer,R.; Schümer-Kohrs,A.;

Schreckenberg,D.; Mehnert,P.; and Griefahn,B.: 2000.

Vergleichende Untersuchung Über Die Lärmwirkung Bei

Straßen- Und Schienenverkehr. (The Relative Annoyance

Caused by Road Traffic and Railway Noise). Zeitschrift Für

Lärmbekämpfung, 4, vol. 46, pp. 144-151.

GER-470 GER-480

Möhler,U.; Schümer,R.; Knall,V.; and Schümer-Kohrs,A.:

1986. Vergleich Der Lästigkeit Von Schienen- Und

Straßenverkehrslärm. (Comparison of the Annoyance Due to

Railway and Road Traffic Noise). Zeitschrift Für

Lärmbekämpfung, vol. 33, pp. 132-142.

GER-192

Mróz,E.; Nidzinska-Mróz,W.; Nejno-Borkowska,U.; and

Mularczyk-Bal,M.: 1998. (Annex 1: Influence of Low

Frequency Noise Existing in Domestic Environment on the

Health of Dwellers. Questionniare Study IN Investigation of

Noise, in Frequency Range From 2 to 125 Hz in Building

Engineering, in Order to Develop the Noise Assessment

Criteria and a Degree of Noise Annoyance) (In Polish).

714/T07/95/09. Building Research Institute (ITB) , Warsaw.

POL-477

Murase,S.; Sato,T.; Yano,T.; Björkman,M.; Rylander,R.; and

Dankittikul,W.: 2000. Comparison of Path Models of Road

Traffic Noise Annoyance in Sweden, Japan, and Thailand.

WESTPRACVII (Seventh Western Pacific Regional

Acoustics Conference), vol. 2, pp. 939-942, Kumamoto,

Japan.

SWE-368 JPN-369 JPN-382 THA-421

Myncke,H.; and Cops,A.: 1978. Vliegtuiglawaai in De

Omgeving Van Vliegvelden En De Hinder Ervan Voor De

Bevolking. (Airplane Noise in the Surroundings of Airports

and Its Annoyance for the Population). Laboratorium Voor

Akoestiek en Warmtegeleiding of the Catholic University of

Leuven.

BEL-151

Myncke,H.; Cops,A.; and Gambart,R.: 1977. Traffic Noise

Measurements in Antwerp and Brussels. Part II: Enquiry

Concerning Annoyance. 9th International Congress on

Acoustics, Madrid, 4-9 July, p. 169.

BEL-122 BEL-137

Myncke,H.; Cops,A.; Gambart,R.; and Steenackers,P.: 1979.

Traffic Noise Measurements in Antwerp and Brussels and

Their Relation With Annoyance. Arch.Acoustics, vol. 30,

pp. 11-26.

BEL-122 BEL-137

Myncke,H.; Cops,A.; and Steenackers,P.: 1977. Traffic Noise

Measurements in Antwerp and Brussels. Part I: Physical

Measurements. 9th International Congress on Acoustics,

Madrid, 4-9 July.

BEL-122 BEL-137

Myncke,H.; Cops,A.; Steenackers,P.; Bruyninckx,W.;

Gambart,R.; and Verleysen,P.: 1977. Studie Van Het

Verkeerslawaai in Steden En De Hinder Ervan Voor De

Bevolking. (Study of Urban Traffic Noise and the Resulting

Annoyance Felt by the Population). Laboratorium voor

Akoestiek en Warmtegeleiding, K. U.-Leuven, Ministerie

van Volksgezondheid en van Het Gezin, Dienst

Milieuhinder.

BEL-122 BEL-137

Nakamura,S.: 1985. Community Response of Noise in Near

Area of Railway. Noise Control, vol. 9, pp. 314-319.

JPN-340

Nakamura,S.; Uehara,Y.; and Imaizumi,N.: 1985. Community

Responses to Noise in Near-Area of Railways. pp. 155-185.

JPN-340

Nakamura,S.; and Yoshida,T.: 1990. Relationship Among Noise

Indexes in Community Reactions to Railways [Sic] Noise.

Inter-noise 90, pp. 1137-1140.

JPN-340

Namba,S.; and Kuwano,S.: 1986. The Reliability of a CrossCultural Study on Noise Problems. Inter-noise 86, pp. 995-

1000.

JPN-510 GER-511 UKD-512

Namba,S.; Kuwano,S.; and Schick,A.: 1986. A Cross-Cultural

Study on Noise Problems. J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn.(E), 5, vol. 7, pp.

279-289.

GER-511 GER-516 JPN-510 JPN-515 UKD-512

Navrud,S.: 2000. Economic Benefits of a Program to Reduce

Transportation and Community Noise - a Contingent

Valuation Survey. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 3395-3400, Nice,

France.

NOR-397

Nemecek,J.; Grandjean,E.; Baumgartner,K.; Müller,T.; and

Roth,G.: 1979. Lärmimmissionen an Der Autobahn N3 Im

Raume Mels-Sargans: Ausmass Der Störung,

Lärmschutzmassnahmen Und Kosten. (Noise Pollution on

the Highway N3 in Area of Sargans: Degree of Disturbances,

Noise Protection and Its Costs). Schweizer Ingenieur Und

Architekt, 7, pp. 105-109.

SWI-159

Nemecek,J.; Grandjean,E.; Baumgartner,K.; Roth,A.; and

Müller,T.: 1978. Lärmschutz an Der Autobahn N3-

Fallstudie. (Noise Protection on the Highway N3- A Case

Study). Sozial-Und Präventivmedizin, vol. 23, pp. 303-304.

SWI-159

Nemecek,J.; Wehrli,B.; and Turrian,V.: 1981. Effects of Street

Traffic in Switzerland, a Review of Four Surveys. J.Sound

Vib., 2, vol. 78, pp. 223-234.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-133-

SWI-053 SWI-133 SWI-158 SWI-173

Newman,J.S.: 1973. Subjective Community Reactions to

Construction Noise (Thesis), Dept. Civil Engineering,

Northwestern University, Illinois.

USA-213

Nimura,T.; Sone,T.; Ebata,M.; and Matsumato,H.: 1975. Noise

Problems With High Speed Railways in Japan. Noise Control

Engineering, 1, vol. 5, pp. 5-11.

JPN-065

Nimura,T.; Sone,T.; and Kono,S.: 1973. Some Consideration on

Noise Problems of High-Speed Railways in Japan. Internoise 73, pp. 298-307.

JPN-065

Nimura,T.; Sone,T.; and Kono,S.: 1981. Evaluation of

Train/Railway Noise. Inter-noise 81, pp. 803-812.

JPN-065 JPN-064 JPN-101

Nitsch,W.; and Schulte-Fortkamp,B.: 1997.

Geräuscheinwirkungen in Stadtvierteln. Eine Sozio Und

Psychoakustische Feld Und Laborstudie ( Noise Effects in

Residential Areas. A Socio and Psycho Acoustical Field and

Laboratory Study), in U. Loeber-Pautsch, W. Nitsch, R.

Rieß, B. Schulte-Fortkamp, and D. Sterzel (eds.), Quer Zu

Den Disziplinen (Across the Disciplines). Offizin, Hannover.

GER-464

Nixon,C.W.; and Borsky,P.N.: 1966. Effects of Sonic Boom on

People; St. Louis, Mo., 1961-1962. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 5, part

2, vol. 39, p. S51-S58.

USA-007

Nixon,C.W.; and Hubbard,H.H.: 1965. Results of USAF-NASAFAA Flight Program to Study Community Responses to

Sonic Booms in the Greater St. Louis Area. NASA TN D2705. NASA.

USA-007

Nurse,K.: 1983. 1982 Manchester Night Noise Study:

Tabulations of the Responses to the Social Surveys. DR

Communication 8301. Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-224

Oi,K.; Suga,S.; and Kondoh,Y.: 1994. Management of

Complaints Caused by Noise and Other Pollution

Phenomena Filed By Residents Flowing Into Industrial

Areas. Inter-noise 94, pp. 1141-1144, Yokohama, Japan.

JPN-497

Oishi,Y.; Mishina,Y.; Hayashi,A.; Okumura,Y.; and Kuno,K.:

1989. Data Storage System for Noise and Vibration.

J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn.(E), 3, vol. 10, pp. 169-174.

CHI-457 JPN-294 JPN-495

Ollerhead,J.B.: 1973. A Pilot Survey of Some Effects of Aircraft

Noise in Residential Communities Near London (Heathrow)

Airport. TT-7302. Loughborough Univ. of Tech., England.

UKD-061

Ollerhead,J.B.: 1977a. A Comparison of Annoyance Caused by

Aircraft Noise Near London, Manchester and Liverpool

Airports. TT-7706. Loughborough Univ. of Tech., England.

UKD-097

Ollerhead,J.B.: 1977b. Alternative Measurements of Aircraft

Noise Nuisance. 9th International Congress on Acoustics, 4-

9 July, Madrid, p. 249.

UKD-061

Ollerhead,J.B.: 1977c. Variation of Community Noise

Sensitivity With Time of Day. Inter-noise 77, pp. 692-697.

UKD-061

Ollerhead,J.B.: 1978. Variation of Community Response to

Aircraft Noise With Time of Day. Noise Control

Engineering, 2, vol. 11, pp. 68-78.

UKD-061

Ollerhead,J.B.: 1980. Accounting for Time of Day and Mixed

Source Effects in the Assessment of Community Noise

Exposure. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Third

International Congress), ASHA Report 10, pp. 556-561,

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville,

Maryland.

UKD-061

Ollerhead,J.B.; and Cousins,J.M.: 1975. A Survey of Reactions

to Aircraft Noise Around London (Gatwick) Airport.

TT/NG/SCC/2. Loughborough Consultants Ltd.,

Loughborough, England.

UKD-052

Ollerhead,J.B.; and Diamond,I.D.: 1993. Social Surveys of

Night-Time Effects of Aircraft Noise. Noise and Man '93:

Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth International

Congress), vol. 3, pp. 373-376, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

UKD-339

Ollerhead,J.B.; and Edwards,R.M.: 1974. Measurement of

Aircraft Noise Impact in Residential Communities Near

Airports. 8th International Congress on Acoustics, London,

p. 122.

UKD-086 UKD-061

Ollerhead,J.B.; and Edwards,R.M.: 1977. A Further Survey of

Some Effects of Aircraft Noise in Residential Communities

Near London (Heathrow) Airport. TT-7705. Loughborough

Univ. of Tech., England.

UKD-061

Ollerhead,J.B.; and Jones,C.J.: 1993. Aircraft Noise and Sleep

Disturbance: A UK Field Study. Noise and Man '93: Noise

as a Public Health Problem (Sixth International Congress),

vol. 3, pp. 353-357, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

UKD-339

Ollerhead,J.B.; Jones,C.J.; Cadoux,R.E.; Woodley,A.;

Atkinson,B.J.; Horne,J.A.; Pankhurst,F.; Reyner,L.;

Hume,K.I.; Van,F.; Watson,A.; Diamond,I.D.; Egger,P.;

Holmes D.; and McKean,J.: 1992. Report of a Field Study of

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance. Department of Safety,

Environment and Engineeering: Civil Aviation Authority,

London.

UKD-339

Olson Laboratories: 1976. Los Angeles International Airport

Environmental Impact Report (Supplement A, Over-Ocean

Operations). Olson Laboratories, Inc., Anaheim, California.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-134-

USA-083

Omiya,M.; Kuno,K.; Mishina,Y.; Oishi,Y.; Hayashi,A.; and

Okumura,Y.: 1998. A Consideration of Criteria for

Environmental Noise Based on Dose-Response. Noise

Effects '98: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Seventh

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 598-601.

JPN-294

Omiya,M.; Kuno,K.; Mishina,Y.; Oishi,Y.; and Hayashi,A.:

1997. Comparison of Community Noise Ratings by L50 and

LAeq. J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 205, pp. 545-554.

JPN-294

Onuu,M.U.: 2000. Road Traffic Noise in Nigeria:

Measurements, Analysis and Evaluation of Nuisance.

J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 2333, pp. 391-405.

NIG-486

Opinion Research of California: 1975. A Public Opinion Study

of the Area Surrounding Los Angeles International Airport

in December 1973. Opinion Research of California, Long

Beach, California.

USA-083

Opinion Research of California: 1977. A Study Among

Residents of Orange County Relative to Operations at

Orange County Airport. Opinion Research of California,

Long Beach, California.

USA-145

Orlich,G.P.: 1979. Community Attitudes, Before and After

Barrier Construction. DOT-FH-11-9490. Minnesota Dept. of

Transportation.

USA-155

Osada,Y.: 1971. Koshu Eiseiin Kenkyu Hokoku (Translation

Available in: Community Reactions to Aircraft Noise in the

Vicinity of Airport: A Comparative Study of the Social

Surveys Using Interview Method. NASA-TM-75439).

Bulletin of Institute of Public Health, Tokyo, vol. 20, pp.

119-127.

JPN-005 JPN-046 JPN-018 JPN-190

Osada,Y.; Yoshida,T.; Yoshida,K.; Kawaguchi,T.;

Hoshiyama,Y.; and Yamamoto,K.: 1997. Path Analysis of

the Community Response to Road Traffic Noise. J.Sound

Vib., 4, vol. 205, pp. 493-498.

JPN-496

Öhrström,E.: 1988. Primary and After Effects on Noise During

Sleep With Reference to Noise Sensitivity and HabituationStudies in Laboratory and Field. Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Fifth International Congress), vol. 1: Abstracts, p.

121, Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm.

SWE-303

Öhrström,E.: 1989. Sleep Disturbance, Psycho-Social and

Medical Symptoms--A Pilot Survey Among Persons Exposed

to High Levels of Road Traffic Noise. J.Sound Vib., vol. 133,

pp. 117-128.

SWE-303

Öhrström,E.: 1991. Psycho-Social Effects of Traffic Noise

Exposure. J.Sound Vib., vol. 151, pp. 513-517.

SWE-344

Öhrström,E.: 1993. Long-Term Effects in Terms of PsychoSocial Wellbeing, Annoyance and Sleep Disturbance in

Areas Exposed to High Levels of Road Traffic Noise. Noise

and Man '93: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 209-212, INRETS,

Arcueil, France.

SWE-344 SWE-345

Öhrström,E.: 1996a. Community Reactions to Noise and

Vibrations From Railway Traffic. Inter-noise 96, pp. 2339-

2344, Liverpool, England.

SWE-365

Öhrström,E.: 1996b. Effekter Av Åtgärder Mot Buller Från

Tågtrafik - Undersökning Vid Bullerskårm i Lund (Effects of

Countermeasures Against Railway Noise a Study of a Noise

Barrier in Lund). 7/96. pp. 1-32, Department of

Environmental Hygiene, University of Gothenburg,

Gothenburg.

SWE-414

Öhrström,E.: 1997a. Community Reactions to Railway Traffic -

Effects of Countermeasures Against Noise and Vibration.

Inter-noise 97, pp. 1065-1070, Budapest, Hungary.

SWE-413

Öhrström,E.: 1997b. Effects of Exposure to Railway Noise--A

Comparison Between Areas With and Without Vibration.

J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 205, pp. 555-560.

SWE-365

Öhrström,E.; Agge,A.; and Björkman,M.: 1998. Sleep

Disturbances Before and After Reduction in Road Traffic

Noise. Noise Effects '98: Noise as a Public Health Problem

(Seventh International Congress), pp. 451-454.

SWE-415

Öhrström,E.; and Björkman,M.: 1983. Sleep Disturbance Before

and After Traffic Noise Attenuation in an Apartment

Building. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 3, vol. 73, pp. 877-879.

SWE-223

Öhrström,E.; Björkman,M.; and Rylander,R.: 1990. Effects of

Noise During Sleep With Reference to Noise Sensitivity and

Habituation: Studies in Laboratory and Field. Env.Int., vol.

16, pp. 447-482.

SWE-303

Öhrström,E.; and Rylander,R.: 1989. Psyko-Sociala

Konsekvenser Av Exponering För Vägtrafik: Resultat Från

Utprovning Av Frågeformulär i En Pilotstudie. Rapport

5/89. ISSN 0280-2600. Institution för Hygien, Göteborgs

Universitet, Göteborg, Sweden.

SWE-344

Öhrström,E.; and Rylander,R.: 1990. Psycho-Social Effects of

Traffic Noise Exposure. Inter-noise 90, pp. 1193-1196.

SWE-344

Öhrström,E.; Rylander,R.; and Björkman,M.: 1988. Effects of

Night Time Road Traffic Noise--An Overview of Laboratory

and Field Studies on Noise Dose and Subjective Noise

Sensitivity. J.Sound Vib., vol. 127, pp. 441-448.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-135-

SWE-303

Öhrström,E.; and Skånberg,A.B.: 1993. The Effect of Exposure

to Noise and Vibrations From Trains - Field Surveys in

Areas Exposed to Different Number of Trains and Different

Levels of Vibrations. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp.

403-406, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

SWE-365

Öhrström,E.; and Skånberg,A.B.: 1995. Effekter Av Exponering

För Buller Och Vibrationer Från Tågtrafik - Undersökningar

i 15 Tåttorter. (Effects of Exposure to Noise and Vibrations

From Railways Traffic). Report 1/95. Department of

Environmental Hygiene, University of Gothenburg.

SWE-365

Öhrström,E.; and Skånberg,A.B.: 1996. A Field Survey on

Effects of Exposure to Noise and Vibration From Railway

Traffic, Part I: Annoyance and Activity Disturbance Effects.

J.Sound Vib., vol. 193, pp. 39-47.

SWE-365

Öhrström,E.; and Skånberg,A.B.: 2000. Adverse Health Effects

in Relation to Noise Mitigation - a Longitudinal Study in the

City of Göteborg. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 2112-2115, Nice,

France.

SWE-415

Paechter,M.; Rohrmann,B.; Wertenbroch,K.; and Wetzel,S.:

1988. The Relevance of Noise for Evaluating and Selecting

Residences. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth

International Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour,

Animal, Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp.

71-76, Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm.

GER-275

Parris,N.: 1984. Community Response to Entertainment Noise.

Fourth Congress of the Federation of Acoustical Societies of

Europe, pp. 167-170.

AUL-247 AUL-248 AUL-249

Passchier-Vermeer,W.; van Gils,K.; Vos,H.; Miedema,H.M.E.;

de Roo,F.; Verhoeff,E.; and Middelkoop,H.A.M.: 1999.

Aircraft Noise and Sleep Disturbance. Pilot Study. TNO98.040, RIVM 441520013. TNO Prevention and Health,

Leiden.

NET-468

Patterson,H.P.: 1975. Documentation Handbook NASA Studies

of Community Response to Aircraft Noise. Doc. no. T75-

AU-9533U@. TRACOR, Austin, Texas.

USA-022 USA-032 USA-044

Patterson,H.P.; and Connor,W.K.: 1973. Community Responses

to Aircraft Noise in Large and Small Cities in the U.S.A.

International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem,

Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May 13-18. USEPA 550-9-73-008.,

pp. 707-720, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Washington D.C.

USA-022 USA-032 USA-044

Patterson,H.P.; Edmiston,R.P.; and Connor,W.K.: 1972.

Preliminary Evaluation of the Effect of a Dynamic

Preferential Runway System Upon Community Noise

Disturbance. NASA CR-125821. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-051

Paulsen,R.; Mau,U.; and Kastka,J.: 1986. Zur Störwirkung Von

Fluglärm Und Verkehrslärm Auf Die Anwohner.

(Disturbance to the Residents by Aircraft and Traffic Noise).

Medical Institut Für Umwelthygiene, Düsseldorf.

GER-372

Pearsons,K.S.; Tabachnick,B.; and Fidell,S.A.: 2000. Summary

of Findings of Recent Field Studies of Noise-Induced Sleep

Disturbance in the United States. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 979-

983, Nice, France.

UKD-339 USA-430 USA-433

Peat Marwick and Partners: 1979. Data Base of the Results of a

National Household Survey of Noise Exposure. Peat,

Marwick and Partners, Canada.

CAN-174

Peeters,A.L.: 1981. Annoyance Due to Railway Noise in

Residential Areas. Inter-noise 81, pp. 821-824.

NET-153

Peeters,A.L.; de Jong,R.G.; Kaper,J.P.; and Tukker,J.C.: 1984.

Hinder Door Spoorweggeluid in De Woonomgeving.

(Railroad Noise Annoyance in Residential Areas)(Also

Published As ICG Report RL-HR-03-03). IMG-TNO Report

D 60. IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-153

Perdue,W.D.: 1979. The Oppression of Noise: A Public Opinion

Survey of Spokane County Citizens on the Problem of

Destructive Sound. Center for Social Research, Eastern

Washington Univ..

USA-171

Perdue,W.D.; and Coates,R.: 1979. Noise: Attitudes and Action:

A Quantitative Analysis of a Public Opinion Survey of

Spokane County Citizens on the Problem of Destructive

Sound. Center for Social Research, Eastern Washington

Univ..

USA-171

Persson,K.; and Rylander,R.: 1993. A Pilot Study Assessing

Long-Term Effects Among People Exposed to Low Level,

Low Frequency Noise in Their Homes. Noise and Man '93:

Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth International

Congress), vol. 2, pp. 407-410, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

SWE-337

Phillips,B.R.: 1978. The Analysis of Social Science Data--The

Ordinal-Interval Controversy (M.Sc. Dissertation), Dept. of

Social Statistics, Univ. of Southampton, England.

UKD-116

Phothiphichitr,W.: 1994. Analysis of 24-Hour Noise Exposure

on Bangkok People. Inter-noise 94, pp. 1021-1026,

Yokohama, Japan.

THA-455

Pickles,A.T.: 1956. Standards of Sound Insulation in Buildings.

Second ICA Congress, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 17-

23, p. 155.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-136-

UKD-003

Pjerotic,L.; and Nikolic,M.: 1993. Impact of Noise and Air

Pollution on Health. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp.

283-286, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

YUG-352

Planungsbüro Obermeyer: 1983. Interdisziplinäre Feldstudie II

Über Die Besonderheiten Des Schienenverkehrslärms

Gegenüber Dem Straßenverkehrslärm, Kurzfassung, Band I,

Band II. (Interdisciplinary Field Study II of the Differences

Between Railway Traffic Noise and Street Traffic Noise,

Summary, Volume I, Volume II). Planungsbüro Obermeyer,

Munich.

GER-192

Porter,N.D.; Kershaw,A.; and Ollerhead,J.B.: 2000. Adverse

Effects of Night-Time Aircraft Noise: Review of 1992 Uk

Findings and Introduction to New Uk Work. Inter-noise

2000, pp. 963-967, Nice, France.

UKD-339, USA-435

POS Associates: 1976. Airport Community Survey: A Survey of

Orange County Residents Relative to the Orange County

Airport. POS Associates, Santa Ana, California.

USA-128

Powell,C.A.; and Fields,J.M.: 1984. Community Annoyance

Due to Controlled Helicopter Noise Exposures. Fourth

Congress of the Federation of Acoustical Societies of Europe,

pp. 313-317.

USA-235

Pravica,P.: 1976. Aircraft Noise Around the Belgrade Airport.

Inter-noise 76, pp. 95-98.

YUG-141

Prescott-Clarke,P.: 1974. People Roads and Countryside. SCPR

Report 09.289. Social and Community Planning Research,

London.

UKD-267

Prescott-Clarke,P.: 1977. Keswick and Cockermouth By-Passes:

The Environmental Effects. SCPR Report 09.473. Social and

Community Planning Research, London.

UKD-267

Prescott-Clarke,P.: 1978. Rural Noise Survey/Methodological

Report. SCPR Report-P.477. Social and Community

Planning Research, London.

UKD-160

Prescott-Clarke,P.: 1979. Upgrading the A66: The

Environmental Impact on Lake District Countryside. SCPR

Report 09.504. Social and Community Planning Research,

London.

UKD-267

Prescott-Clarke,P.: 1980. People and Roads in the Lake District:

a Study of the A66 Road Improvement Scheme. TRRL

Report SR 606. Transport and Road Research Laboratory,

Crowthorne, England.

UKD-267

Prescott-Clarke,P.: 1983. 1982 Aircraft Noise Index Study and

1982 Helicopter Disturbance Study: Methodological Report.

Social and Community Planning Research, London.

UKD-225 UKD-242

Prescott-Clarke,P.; and Stowell,R.: 1983. Night Noise

Disturbance by Aircraft: Methodological Report. Social and

Community Planning Research, London.

UKD-147

Psichas,K.; Vallet,M.; and Vogiatzis,C.: 1993. A Social Noise

Survey In The Holiday-City of Rhodes. Noise and Man '93:

Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth International

Congress), vol. 2, pp. 615-618, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

GRE-331

Putra,A.: 1990. The Effect of Ambient Noise Levels From Road

Traffic on Community Response to Aircraft Noise (Ph.D.

Thesis), Graduate School of the Built Environment,

University of New South Wales, Kensington, Australia.

AUL-307

Putra,A.; and Lawrence,A.B.: 1991. The Effect of Ambient

Noise Levels From Road Traffic on Peoples Responses to

Aircraft Noise. Inter-noise 91, pp. 899-902.

AUL-307

Rabinowitz,J.; Bakonyi,M.; Bocquet,J.J.; Meyer,G.R.;

Olivetti,R.é.; and Rey,P.: 1988. Effects of Noise in MultiStorey Buildings. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth

International Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour,

Animal, Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp.

247-252, Swedish Council for Building Research,

Stockholm.

SWI-304

Rabrait,J.M.: 1984. Etude "Gêne Due Aux Bruits Impulsifs":

Rapport Final. (Study "Discomfort Due to Impulse Noise":

Final Report). Société d'Etudes pour le Développement

Economique et Social, Paris.

FRA-252

Radulov,S.: 1974. The Disturbing Effect of Street Traffic Noise

on the Population of Housing Quarters. 8th International

Congress on Acoustics, London, p. 127.

CZE-109

Raw,G.J.; and Griffiths,I.D.: 1985. The Effect of Changes in

Aircraft Noise Exposure. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 101, pp. 273-

275.

USA-203

Raw,G.J.; and Griffiths,I.D.: 1990. Subjective Response to

Changes in Road Traffic Noise: A Model. J.Sound Vib., vol.

141, pp. 43-54.

UKD-237

Raw,G.J.; and Oseland,N.A.: 1991. Subjective Response to

Noise Through Party Floors in Conversion Flats. Applied

Acoustics, vol. 32, pp. 215-231.

UKD-436

Recuero,M.; Blanco-Martin,E.; and Grundman,J.: 1996. Study

of the Acoustical Environment of a City. Inter-noise 96, pp.

2367-2370, Liverpool, England.

SPA-409
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-137-

Relster,E.: 1975. Traffic Noise Annoyance, The Psychological

Effect of Traffic Noise in Housing Areas. Polyteknisk Forlag,

Lyngby, Denmark.

DEN-075

Relster,E.: 1981. Støjdaempning i Boligområder. (Noise

Reduction in Residential Areas). University of Copenhagen,

Copenhagen.

DEN-075

Renew,W.D.: 1993. Attitudes to Road Traffic in Brisbane. Noise

and Man '93: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 213-216, INRETS,

Arcueil, France.

AUL-332

Renew,W.D.: 2000. Responses to Road Traffic Noise in

Brisbane. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 5, pp. 2841-2843, Nice,

France.

AUL-332

Richardson,I.G.: 1976. A Study of Factors Causing Railway

Noise Annoyance (M.Sc. Dissertation), Dept. of Social

Statistics, Univ. of Southampton, England.

UKD-116

Richmond,C.: 1985. CEC Joint Study of Community Response

to Aircraft Noise 1984. Tabulations of Response to Social

Surveys Near Glasgow Airport. DORA Report 8509 (Second

Edition). Civil Aviation Authority, London.

UKD-238

Ritterstaedt,U.; and Kastka,J.: 1981. On the Difference in

Annoyance Between Road Traffic Noise and Industrial Plant

Noise. Inter-noise 81, pp. 817-820.

GER-231

Ritterstaedt,U.; and Kastka,J.: 1985. CEC Joint Project on

Impulse Noise: A New Definition of Impulsiveness of

Environmental Noise. Inter-noise 85, pp. 917-920.

GER-253

Robertson,K.; Flindell,I.H.; Jiggins,M.; Wright,N.; and

Turner,C.: 2000. Night-Time Aircraft Noise and Sleep - the

1999 Uk Trial Methodology Study Using Both Field and

Laboratory Methods. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 968-973, Nice,

France.

UKD-483

Rohrmann,B.: 1975. Die Gestörtheit Der Bevölkerung Durch

Den Flugbetrieb Auf Landerplätzen. (The Disturbance of the

Population by Aircraft Operations at Airports)(Unpublished

Report Prepared for Bundesministeriums Des Innern,

Bonn)(Translation Available in: Disturbance to the

Population Due to Flight Operations at Landing Fields.

NASA-TM-76531, 1981). Hamburg, Germany.

GER-114

Rohrmann,B.: 1976. Community Reaction on Non-Commercial

and Sporting Aviation. Inter-noise 76, pp. 427-430.

GER-114

Rohrmann,B.: 1978. Design and Preliminary Results of an

Interdisciplinary Field Study on Urban Noise. J.Sound Vib.,

vol. 59, pp. 111-113.

GER-134

Rohrmann,B.; Finke,H.O.; and Guski,R.: 1980. Analysis of

Reactions to Different Environmental Noise Sources in

Residential Areas (An Urban Noise Study). Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Third International Congress), ASHA

Report 10, pp. 548-555, American Speech-LanguageHearing Association, Rockville, Maryland.

GER-134

Rohrmann,B.; and Scharnberg,T.: 1981. Betroffenheit Einer

Stadt Durch Lärm: Bericht Über Eine Interdisziplinäre

Untersuchung (Projekt BSL) Band 2: Daten-Dokumentation

Und Zusatzstudien. [Objective and Subjective Noise Impact

on a Town: Report on an Interdisciplinary

Investigation(Project BSL) Vol. 2: Documentation of Data

and Additional Studies]. Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.

GER-134

Rohrmann,B.; Schümer,R.; Schümer-Kohrs,A.; Guski,R.; and

Finke,H.O.: 1973. An Interdisciplinary Study on the Effects

of Aircraft Noise on Man. International Congress on Noise

as a Public Health Problem, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May

13-18. USEPA 550-9-73-008., pp. 765-776, U.S.

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C.

GER-034

Romero-Faus,J.: 1987. Evaluacion De La Respuesta Subjetiva

Producida Por El Ruido De Trafico En La Ciudad De

Gandia. (Evaluation of the Subjective Response to Road

Traffic Noise in the City of Gandia) (Ph.D. Dissertation),

University of Valencia, Spain.

SPA-313

Romero,J.; and García,A.: 1992. Noise Survey in a Medium Size

Spanish Town. 14th International Congress on Acoustics,

pp. E1-6, Beijing.

SPA-314 SPA-317

Romero,J.; García,A.; and García,A.M.: 1989. Noise Survey in a

Holiday Beach Resort. Congress of the Federation of

Acoustical Societies of Europe, FASE 89, pp. 125-128.

SPA-314

Roner,A.: 1999. Verkher, Umwelt Und Lebensqualität Bei

Kindern Kinderstudie 1: Interner Bericht Des Institut Für

Sozialmedizin Zur UVPUnterinntaltrasse (Transportation,

Environment and Quality of Life for Children, Children

Study 1: Internal Report of the Institute for Social Medicine

on Lower Inn Valley Environmental Assessment). Institute

for Social Medicine, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck.

AUS-488

Roner,A.; and Roitner-Grabher,E.: 1998. Vergleiche Zwischen

Den Schulen: Interner Bericht Des Institut Für

Sozialmedizin Zur UVP - Unterinntaltrasse. (Comparisons

Between Schools: Internal Report of the Institute for Social

Medicine on the Lower Inn Valley Environmental

Assessment). Institute for Social Medicine, Universität

Innsbruck.

AUS-488

Rosman,P.F.: 1980. Subjective Responses to the Environmental
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-138-

Effects of Traffic in Real Life and Simulated Environments.

TRRL Laboratory Report 911. Transport and Road Research

Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.

UKD-277

Rossall,A.W.: 1978. The Measurement and Analysis of Road

Traffic Noise (M.Sc. Dissertation), University of Salford,

England.

UKD-162

Rott,J.A.: 1995. Mapa Simplificado De Ruídos Para a Cidade De

Porto Alegre (Simplified Noise Map for the City of Porto

Alegre) (M.Sc.), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do

Sul.

BRA-474

Rozec,V.; and Moch,A.: 2000. Towards a Comfortable Outdoor

Sound Environment. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 2, pp. 1467-

1470, Nice, France.

FRA-392

Rozec,V.; and Rumeau,M.: 2000. L'Évaluation De L'Ambiance

Sonore En Quartiers Tranquilles Ou Zones 30 (The

Evaluation of Sound Environment in Quiet Area or "Zone

30"). Acoustique & Techniques, vol. 20, pp. 30-38.

FRA-392

Rylander,R.: 1977. Traffic Noise Annoyance With Relation to

Vehicle Pattern. Institute of Acoustics, May 1977, p. 12.6.1-

12.6.4.

SWE-142

Rylander,R.; Åhrlin,U.; and Björkman,M.: 1977. Traffic Noise

Annoyance With Relation to Vehicle Pattern. Report 1-77.

Department of Environmental Hygiene, University of

Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

SWE-142

Rylander,R.; Åhrlin,U.; and Lundquist,B.: 1993. Annoyance

From Artillery Shooting Range Noise. Noise and Man '93:

Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth International

Congress), vol. 2, pp. 605-608, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

SWE-437

Rylander,R.; Åhrlin,U.; and Lundquist,B.: 1994. Strörningar Av

Buller Från Skjutfält För Tunga Vapen - Samband Mellan

Exponering Och Störning (Annoyance From Shooting Range

Noise for Heavy Weapons - Relation Between Exposure and

Annoyance). 1/94. Institutionen för Miljömedicin,

Gothenburg.

SWE-437

Rylander,R.; and Björkman,M.: 1997. Annoyance by Aircraft

Noise Around Small Airports. J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 205, pp.

533-537.

SWE-419

Rylander,R.; Björkman,M.; Åhrlin,U.; and Sörensen,S.: 1977.

Tramway Noise in City Traffic. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 51, pp.

353-358.

SWE-165

Rylander,R.; Björkman,M.; Åhrlin,U.; Sörensen,S.; and

Berglund,K.: 1980. Aircraft Noise Annoyance Contours:

Importance of Overflight Frequency and Noise Level.

J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 69, pp. 583-595.

SWE-035

Rylander,R.; Björkman,M.; and Sörensen,S.: 1993. DoseResponse Relationships for Environmental Noises. Noise and

Man '93: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 225-227, INRETS,

Arcueil, France.

SWE-035 SWE-228 SWE-359

Rylander,R.; and Lundquist,B.: 1996. Annoyance Caused by

Noise From Heavy Weapon Shooting Ranges. J.Sound Vib.,

1, vol. 192, pp. 199-206.

SWE-437

Rylander,R.; and Sörensen,S.: 1973. Aircraft Noise

Determinants for the Extent of Annoyance Reactions.

International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem,

Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May 13-18 1973. USEPA 550-9-73-

008., pp. 661-667, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Washington D.C.

SWE-035

Rylander,R.; Sörensen,S.; Alexandre,A.; and Gilbert,Ph.: 1973.

Determinants for Aircraft Noise Annoyance--A Comparison

Between French and Scandinavian Data. J.Sound Vib., vol.

28, pp. 15-21.

SWE-035 FRA-016

Rylander,R.; Sörensen,S.; Andrae,B.O.; Chatelier,G.;

Espmark,Y.; Larsson,T.; and Thackray,R.I.: 1974. Sonic

Boom Exposure Effects--A Field Study on Humans and

Animals. J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 33, pp. 471-486.

SWE-108

Rylander,R.; Sörensen,S.; and Berglund,K.: 1972. Sonic Boom

Effects on Sleep--a Field Experiment on Military and

Civilian Populations. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 24, pp. 41-50.

SWE-054

Rylander,R.; Sörensen,S.; and Berglund,K.: 1974. Re-Analysis

of Aircraft Noise Annoyance Data Against the DB(A) Peak

Concept. J.Sound Vib., vol. 36, pp. 399-406.

FRA-016 GER-134 JPN-046 NET-013 SWE-035

Rylander,R.; Sörensen,S.; Berglund,K.; and Brodin,C.: 1972.

Experiments on the Effects of Sonic-Boom Exposure on

Humans. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 2, vol. 51, pp. 790-798.

SWE-222

Rylander,R.; Sörensen,S.; and Kajland,A.: 1972. Annoyance

Reactions From Aircraft Noise Exposure. J.Sound Vib., 4,

vol. 24, pp. 419-444.

SWE-035

Rylander,R.; Sörensen,S.; and Kajland,A.: 1976. Traffic Noise

Exposure and Annoyance Reactions. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol.

47, pp. 1-6.

SWE-142

Saadu,A.A.; Onyeonwu,R.O.; Ayorinde,E.O.; and Ogisi,F.O.:

1996. Community Attitudinal Survey and Analysis of Eight

Nigerian Cities. Applied Acoustics, 1, vol. 49, pp. 49-69.

NIG-485

Saadu,A.A.; Onyeonwu,R.O.; Ayorinde,E.O.; and Ogisi,F.O.:
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-139-

1998. Road Traffic Noise Survey and Analysis of Some

Major Urban Centers in Nigeria. Noise Control Engineering,

4, vol. 46, pp. 146-158.

NIG-485

Sakai,T.: 1984. Community Reaction to Construction Noise.

Inter-noise 84, pp. 783-788.

JPN-271

Samra,S.: 1978. Hovercraft Noise Annoyance in the Solent.

ISVR Memo 580. Univ. of Southampton, England.

UKD-161

Sando,F.D.; and Batty,V.: 1975. Road Traffic and the

Environment. Social Trends, 5, pp. 64-69.

UKD-072

Sargent,J.W.: 1984. The Effectiveness of Insulation Measures

Against Traffic Noise. Institute of Acoustics Spring

Conference 1984, pp. 317-321, Swansea.

UKD-481

Sato,T.: 1988. The Effect of Vibration on Annoyance of Noise:

A Survey on Traffic Noise and Vibration in Sapporo. Noise

as a Public Health Problem (Fifth International Congress),

vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour, Animal, Combined Agents

and Community Responses, pp. 259-264, Swedish Council

for Building Research, Stockholm.

JPN-292

Sato,T.: 1993. A Path Analysis of the Effect of Vibration on

Road Traffic Noise Annoyance. Noise and Man '93: Noise as

a Public Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol.

2, pp. 411-414, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

JPN-292 JPN-341 JPN-447

Sato,T.: 1994. Path Analyses of the Effect of Vibration on Road

Traffic and Railway Noise Annoyance. Inter-noise 94, pp.

923-928, Yokohama, Japan.

JPN-292 JPN-341 JPN-447 JPN-448 JPN-449

Sato,T.; Murase,S.; Yano,T.; Björkman,M.; Rylander,R.; and

Dankittikul,W.: 2000. Comparison of Community Response

to Road Traffic Noise in Sweden, Japan and Thailand.

WESTPRACVII (Seventh Western Pacific Regional

Acoustics Conference), vol. 2, pp. 907-912, Kumamoto,

Japan.

SWE-368 JPN-369 JPN-382 THA-421

Sato,T.; Yamashita,T.; Yano,T.; and Kurosawa,K.: 1997.

Comparison of Community Responses to Road Traffic Noise

Between Detached and Apartment House Residents: a

Survey in Sapporo, Japan. Inter-noise 97, pp. 1257-1260.

JPN-446

Sato,T.; Yano,T.; Björkman,M.; and Rylander,R.: 1999.

Comparison of Community Responses to Road Traffic Noise

Among Residents of Different Types of Housing. Inter-noise

99, pp. 1321-1326, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

SWE-368

Sato,T.; Yano,T.; Björkman,M.; and Rylander,R.: 2000.

Comparison of Community Response to Road Traffic Noise

in Japan and Sweden, Part I: Outline of Surveys and DoseResponse Relationships. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 5, pp. 3189-

3194, Nice, France.

SWE-368 JPN-369 JPN-382

Sato,T.; Yano,T.; Yamashita,T.; Kawai,K.; Rylander,R.;

Björkman,M.; and Öhrström,E.: 1998a. Cross-Cultural

Comparison of Community Responses to Road Traffic Noise

in Gothenburg, Sweden, and Kumamoto, Japan, Part I:

Outline of Surveys and Dose-Response Relationships. Noise

Effects ‘98: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Seventh

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 561-564.

JPN-369 SWE-368

Sato,T.; Yano,T.; Yamashita,T.; Kawai,K.; Rylander,R.;

Björkman,M.; and Öhrström,E.: 1998b. Cross-Cultural

Comparison of Community Responses to Road Traffic Noise

in Gothenburg, Sweden, and Kumamoto, Japan, Part II:

Causal Modeling by Path Analysis. Noise Effects ‘98: Noise

as a Public Health Problem (Seventh International

Congress), vol. 2, pp. 565-568.

JPN-369 SWE-368

Sattler,M.A.: 1999. Urban Noise Survey for the City of Porto

Alegre, Brazil. ASA/EAA/DEGA Meeting (Published on a

CD of voluntary submitted papers), Berlin.

BRA-474

Sattler,M.A.; and Rott,J.A.: 1996. Social Survey on Traffic

Noise for the City of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Inter-noise 96, pp.

2371-2374, Liverpool, England.

BRA-474

Scharnberg,T.: 1985. Sleep Impairments Caused by Road

Traffic Noise in Cities. Inter-noise 85, pp. 953-956.

GER-256

Scharnberg,T.; and Wühler,K.: 1982. Beeinträchtigung Des

Nachtschlafs Durch Lärm. Materialienband. (Sleep

Impairments Caused by Road Traffic Noise. Annex).

Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.

GER-256

Scharnberg,T.; Wühler,K.; Finke,H.O.; and Guski,R.: 1982.

Beeinträchtigung Des Nachtschlafs Durch Lärm. (Sleep

Impairments Caused by Road Traffic Noise).

Umweltbundesamt, Berlin.

GER-256

Schick,A.; Kuwano,S.; and Namba,S.: 1984. Cross-Cultural

Examinations of Noise in the Neighborhood. Inter-noise 84,

pp. 967-970.

GER-511 JPN-510

Schick,A.; Zheng,D.; Müller-Andritzky,M.; Namba,S.;

Kuwano,S.; and Chassein,J.: 1992. Audibility and

Annoyance As a Factor in Residential Neighbourhoods. A

Comparison Between China, Germany and Japan. 14th ICA,

pp. H1-8, Beijing.

GER-516 JPN-515

Schliewinsky,F.; and Adams,M.J.: 1979. Analysis of Noise

Barrier Impact on Dissatisfaction With Freeway

Annoyances. Ministry of Transportation and

Communications, Toronto.

CAN-280
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-140-

Scholes,W.E.: 1977. The Physical and Subjective Evaluation of

Roadside Barriers. Inter-noise 77, p. A144-A153.

UKD-050

Scholes,W.E.; Mackie,A.M.; Vulkan,G.H.; and Harland,D.G.:

1974. Performance of a Motorway Noise Barrier at Heston.

Applied Acoustics, vol. 7, pp. 1-13.

UKD-050

Schomer,P.D.: 1979. The Growth of Community Annoyance

With Loudness of Events and With Frequency of Occurrence

of Events. TM N-83. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

USA-170

Schomer,P.D.: 1981a. Community Reaction to Impulse Noise;

Results of the First Survey. CERL Technical Report N-100.

Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign,

Illinois.

USA-170

Schomer,P.D.: 1981b. The Growth of Community Annoyance

With Loudness and Frequency of Occurrence of Events.

Noise Control Engineering, 1, vol. 17, pp. 30-37.

USA-170

Schomer,P.D.: 1982. A Model to Describe Community Response

to Impulse Noise. Noise Control Engineering, 1, vol. 18, pp.

5-15.

USA-170

Schomer,P.D.: 1983a. A Survey of Community Attitudes

Towards Noise Near a General Aviation Airport.

J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 6, vol. 74, pp. 1773-1781.

USA-250

Schomer,P.D.: 1983b. Time of Day Noise Adjustments or

"Penalties". J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 2, vol. 73, pp. 546-555.

USA-170

Schomer,P.D.: 1996. Penalties for Assessing Helicopter Noise

Annoyance--There Is None? Noise-Con 96, pp. 581-586,

Seattle, Washington.

USA-490

Schomer,P.D.: 1999. Comments on "A Field Survey on the

Annoyance Caused by Sounds From Large Firearms and

Road Traffic"[J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104, 2890-2902 (1998)].

Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 3, vol. 106, pp.

1594-1598.

GER-454

Schomer,P.D.; and Wagner,R.L.: 1996. On the Contribution of

Noticeability of Environmental Sounds to Noise Annoyance.

Noise Control Eng.J., 6, vol. 44, pp. 294-305.

USA-490

Schoonderbeek,W.: 1986. Akoestisch Onderzoek Naar De

Effecten Op De Geluidbelasting Door Invoering Van

Trolleybussen Op Buslijn 9 in Arnhem. (Acoustical Research

on the Effects on Noise Exposure From the Introduction of

Trolley Buses on Busline #9 in Arnhem). Van Dorsser bv

Report Nr. 3880.A. Van Dorsser bv, Arnhem.

NET-362

Schulte-Fortkamp,B.: 1994. Geraeusche Beurteilen Im Labor.

Entwicklung Interdisziplinaerer Forschungsmethoden Und

Ihre Forschungssoziologische Analyse (Assessing Noises in

the Laboratory. Developing Interdisciplinary Research

Methods and Their Sociological Analysis). VDIVerlag,

Düsseldorf.

GER-464

Schulte-Fortkamp,B.: 1995. Loudness Judgments of

Environmental Sounds. Validation by a Study in Laboratory

and Field. Inter-noise 95, pp. 889-892, Newport Beach, CA.

GER-464

Schulte-Fortkamp,B.: 1996. Combined Methods to Investigate

Effects of Noise Exposure and Subjective Noise Assessment.

Inter-noise 96, pp. 2351-2356, Liverpool.

GER-464

Schulte-Fortkamp,B.: 2000. Noise Annoyance and Decisions

Concerning Measurement on Combined Noises. Proceedings

of the 2nd Congress of Slovenian Acoustical Society, pp.

295-302, Portoroz, Slovonia.

GER-464

Schultz,T.J.: 1978. Synthesis of Social Surveys on Noise

Annoyance. J.Acoust.Soc.Am., vol. 64, pp. 377-405.

AUS-014 AUS-093 BEL-122 BEL-137 CAN-121 DEN-075

FRA-016 FRA-019 FRA-041 FRA-063 GER-034 SWE-021

SWE-025 SWE-035 SWI-053 UKD-008 UKD-024 UKD071 USA-022 USA-032 USA-044 USA-082 USA-102 USA203 USA-204

Schümer-Kohrs,A.; Schümer,R.; Schreckenberg,D.;

Griefahn,B.; and Möhler,U.: 1998. Annoyance Due to

Railway and Road Traffic Noise: First Results of an

Interdisciplinary Study. Noise Effects '98: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Seventh International Congress), pp. 487-

490.

GER-470

Schümer,R.; Kasubek,W.; Knall,V.; and Schümer-Kohrs,A.:

1981. Reactions to Road and Railway Traffic Noise in Urban

and Rural Areas. Inter-noise 81, pp. 827-830.

GER-192

Schümer,R.; and Schreckenberg,D.: 2000. Änderung Der

Lärmbelästigung Bei Maßnahme Bedingter, Stufenweise

Veränderter Geräuschbelastung: Hinweise Auf Einige

Befunde and Interpretationsansätze. Zeitschrift Für

Lärmbekämpfung, 4, vol. 46, pp. 134-143.

GER-471

Schümer,R.; and Schümer-Kohrs,A.: 1983. The Influence of

Some Non-Acoustical Factors on Reactions to Road and

Railway Noise. Inter-noise 83, pp. 935-938.

GER-192

Schümer,R.; and Zeichart,K.: 1989a. Strukturanalysen Zur

Reaktion Auf Verkehrslärm: Teil I: Untersuchungsansatz.

(Structural Models for the Reactions on Road and Railway

Traffic Noise: Part I: Study Methods). Zeitschrift Für

Lärmbekämpfung, vol. 36, pp. 12-18.

GER-192

Schümer,R.; and Zeichart,K.: 1989b. Strukturanalysen Zur

Reaktion Auf Verkehrslärm: Teil II: Ergebnisse. (Structural
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-141-

Models for the Reactions on Road and Railway Traffic

Noise: Part II: Results). Zeitschrift Für Lärmbekämpfung,

vol. 36, pp. 41-48.

GER-192

Schümer,R.; Zeichart,K.; and Schümer-Kohrs,A.: 1988.

Structural Models for the Effects of Road and Railway Noise.

Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth International

Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour, Animal,

Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp. 315-319,

Swedish Council for Building Research, Stockholm.

GER-192

Seshagiri,B.V.: 1979. Impulsive Noise From Forging

Operations. Reaction of Some Communities in Ontario.

Noise Pollution Control Section, Ontario Ministry of

Environment, Toronto, Canada.

CAN-136

Seshagiri,B.V.: 1981. Reaction of Communities to Impulse

Noise. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 74, pp. 47-60.

CAN-136

Shibuya,A.; Tanno,S.; Sone,T.; and Nimura,T.: 1975. Road

Traffic Noise and Community Response in Sendai City.

Inter-noise 75, pp. 425-428.

JPN-094

Shield,B.M.: 1992. Investigation of Noise Annoyance Caused by

Urban Light Rail Systems: Final Report.

UKD-355

Shield,B.M.; and Zhukov,A.N.: 1992. Correlation Between

Annoyance and Noise Level on an Urban Light Rail System.

Euro-Noise 92, pp. 413-419.

UKD-355

Shield,B.M.; and Zhukov,A.N.: 1993. Community Response to

Low Frequency Noise From an Urban Light Rail System.

Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public Health Problem (Sixth

International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 415-418, INRETS,

Arcueil, France.

UKD-355

Shima,R.; and Tamura,A.: 1993. Survey on Sound Environment

of the Central Part of Odawara. J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn.(E), 3, vol.

14, pp. 181-187.

JPN-494

Shoji,H.; Kitamura,Z.; Takeuchi,R.; Kitamura,O.; Hiwatari,S.;

Tsuji,K.; and Horiuchi,K.: 1953. Studies on the Permissible

Sound Levels for City-Noise, Part I: The Permissible Value

for Noise Levels Outside Factories. J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn., 4, vol.

9, pp. 255-264.

JPN-005

Simpson,M.A.; Pearsons,K.S.; Fidell,S.A.; and

Muehlenbeck,R.H.: 1974. Social Survey and Noise

Measurement Program to Assess the Effects of Noise on the

Urban Environment. BBN Rep. No. 2753. Bolt Beranek and

Newman, Canoga Park, California.

USA-102

Sisma,P.: 1998. Monitoring of Influence of Environmental

Noise on Health. Noise Effects '98: Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Seventh International Congress), pp. 289-292.

CZE-402

Sisma,P.: 2000. Health Significance of Data on Annoyance by

Ambient Noise. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 2107-2111, Nice,

France.

CZE-402

Small,A.M.; and Jenkins,A.: 1982. Methodological Concerns in

a Freeway Noise Study. Human Factors Society Bulletin, 10,

vol. 25, pp. 1-3.

USA-088

Small,A.M.; Jenkins,A.; and Carroll,F.T.: 1976. Methodological

Concerns in an Environmental Psychology Study. Western

Psychological Association Meeting.

USA-088

Small,A.M.; Jenkins,A.; and Pahl,J.: 1974. Community

Response to Freeway Noise in Los Angeles County. Internoise 74, pp. 445-448.

USA-088

Smith,A.P.; Hayward,S.; and Rich,N.: 2000. Perceptions of

Aircraft Noise Exposure, Noise Sensitivity? Sleep

Disturbance and Health: Results From the Bristol Noise,

Sleep and Health Study. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 984-987, Nice,

France.

UKD-424

Smith,A.P.; and Rich,N.: 2000. Noise Exposure, Noise

Sensitivity, Sleep and Subjective Health: Results From a

Community Sample. Inter-noise 2000, pp. 2094-2097, Nice,

France.

UKD-424

Snyder,J.C.: 1977. 19??. Environmental Data Analysis of

Results of a Survey in San Juan, Puerto Rico. Project E-17-

615. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.

PUR-188

So,M.; and Kimura,S.: 1998. Analysis About Occupant

Awareness Regarding the Multi-Family Housing Sound

Environment. Noise Effects ‘98: Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Seventh International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 548-

551.

JPN-377

So,M.; Kimura,S.; and Inoue,K.: 1995. Necessity of HeavyWeight Soft Impact Source for Impact Sound Insulation

Performance Tests: Floor Impact Sound Insulation

Performance of Floor Slab (Part 1). Inter-noise 95, pp. 731-

734.

JPN-377

So,M.; Kimura,S.; and Inoue,K.: 1996. Analysis of Occupancy

Evaluation As to Multi-Family Housing Sound Environment.

Third Joint Meeting of Acoustical Society of America and

Acoustical Society of Japan, pp. 495-500.

JPN-377

So,M.; Kimura,S.; and Kaji,Y.: 1998. Analysis of the Structure

of Occupancy Awareness Regarding the Multi-Family

Housing Sound Environment. J.Archit.Plann.Environ.Eng.,

AIJ, 506, pp. 1-7.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-142-

JPN-377

So,M.; Kimura,S.; Kaji,Y.; and Suzuki,H.: 1996. Research into

the Formation of Resident Awareness of Sound

Environments in Multi-Family Dwellings Through Analyses

of Freely-Offered Opinions. J.Archit.Plann.Environ.Eng.,

AIJ, 485, pp. 1-8.

JPN-377

So,M.; Kimura,S.; Suzuki,H.; and Kaji,Y.: 1997. Analysis of

Occupant Evaluations of the Overall Dwelling Environment

and Sound Environment in Multi-Family Housing

Complexes. J.Archit.Plann.Environ.Eng., AIJ, 493, pp. 9-15.

JPN-377

Sobotová,L.; Ághová,L.; Jurkovicová,J.; and Voleková,J.:

2000a. Hodnotenie Rizika z Hlukovej Expozície v Súbore

Vysokokolákov (Evaluation of the Risk of Exposure to Noise

in a Group of University Students). Hygiena, vol. 45, pp.

109-118.

SLO-406 SLO-407

Sobotová,L.; Ághová,L.; Jurkovicová,J.; and Voleková,J.:

2000b. Noise Annoyance Risk Estimation Possibilities -

Results From Two Surveys. pp. 7-12.

SLO-406 SLO-407

Sobotová,L.; Ághová,L.; Jurkovicová,J.; and Voleková,J.:

2000c. Road Traffic Noise and the Effect on Health. pp. 63-

66.

SLO-407

Sobotová,L.; Ághová,L.; Voleková,J.; and Jurkovicová,J.: 1997.

The Impact of Road Traffic Noise on Citizens in a Large

City. Transcom  ́97, vol. 3, pp. 207-210, University of

Zilina, Zilina.

SLO-406

Sobotová,L.; Jurkovicová,J.; Voleková,J.; and Ághová,L.: 2000.

Psychohygienic Aspects of Noise: Comparison of Two Noise

Annoyance Surveys Performed in an Interval of Ten Years.

Homeostasis, vol. 40, pp. 144-146.

SLO-406 SLO-407

Socialforskningsintituttet: 1987. Flystøjsgener i

Kastrup.[Annoyance by Aircraft Noise at Kastrup).

Socialforskningsintituttet (Institute for social sciences),

Copenhagen.

DEN-380 DEN-381

Sone,T.; Kono,S.; Nimura,T.; Kameyama,S.; and Kumagai,M.:

1973. Effects of High Speed Train Noise on the Community

Along a Railway. (Translation Available in BBN Technical

Information Report 87. Bolt Beranek and Newman,

Cambridge). J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn., vol. 29, pp. 214-224.

JPN-065

Sölder,M.: 1998. UVP Lärmmessungen, Einreichung Bei Der

UVP Behörde, Messbericht Teil 1- 5. Im Auftrag Der BEG

(Environmental Assessment Noise Measurement Report:

Submission of the Environmental Assessment Office,

Measurement Report Parts 1- 5,Commissioned by the

Brenner Eisenbahn Gesellschaft.). BEG.

AUS-487 AUS-488 AUS-521

Sörensen,S.; Berglund,K.; and Rylander,R.: 1973. Reaction

Patterns in Annoyance Response to Aircraft Noise.

International Congress on Noise as a Public Health Problem,

Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, May 13-18. USEPA 550-9-73-008,

pp. 669-667, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,

Washington D.C.

SWE-035

Sörensen,S.; and Hammar,N.: 1983a. Annoyance Reactions Due

to Railway Noise. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 87, pp. 315-319.

SWE-228

Sörensen,S.; and Hammar,N.: 1983b. Störingsreaktioner Vid

Exponering För Tagbuller. (Annoyance Reactions to Railway

Noise). Environmental Protection Board, Stockholm.

SWE-228

Sörensen,S.; and Magnusson,J.: 1979. Annoyance Caused by

Noise From Shooting Ranges. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 62, pp.

437-442.

SWE-185

Stansfeld,S.A.: 1983. Noise Sensitivity and Psychiatric Disorder

in a Community Sample. Noise as a Public Health Problem

(Fourth International Congress), pp. 703-706, Centro

Ricerche e Studi Amplifon, Milano, Italy.

UKD-305

Stansfeld,S.A.: 1988. Sensitivity to Noise--Source of Error or

Stable Personality Characteristic? Convegno Internazionale

"IL RUMORE URBANO E IL GOVERNO DEL

TERRITORIO", pp. 57-64.

UKD-305

Stansfeld,S.A.: 1992. Noise, Noise Sensitivity and Psychiatric

Disorder: Epidemiological and Psychophysiological Studies.

Psychological Medicine, Monograph Supplement 22.

Cambridge University Press.

UKD-305

Stansfeld,S.A.; Clark,C.R.; Jenkins,L.M.; and Tarnopolsky,A.:

1985a. Sensitivity to Noise in a Community Sample: I.

Measurement of Psychiatric Disorder and Personality.

Psychological Medicine, vol. 15, pp. 243-254.

UKD-305

Stansfeld,S.A.; Clark,C.R.; Jenkins,L.M.; and Tarnopolsky,A.:

1985b. Sensitivity to Noise in a Community Sample: II.

Measurement of Psychophysiological Indices. Psychological

Medicine, vol. 15, pp. 255-263.

UKD-305

Stansfeld,S.A.; Gallacher,J.E.J.; Babisch,W.; and Elwood,P.C.:

1993. Road Traffic Noise, Noise Sensitivity and Psychiatric

Disorder: Preliminary Prospective Findings From the

Caerphilly Study. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 3, pp.

268-274, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

UKD-426

Stansfeld,S.A.; Gallacher,J.E.J.; Babisch,W.; and Shipley,M.:

1996. Road Traffic Noise and Psychiatric Disorder:

Prospective Findings From the Caerphilly Study. BMJ, vol.

313, pp. 266-267.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-143-

UKD-426

Stansfeld,S.A.; Gallacher,J.E.J.; Sharp,D.S.; and Babisch,W.:

1993. Road Traffic Noise, Noise Sensitivity and

Psychological Disorder. Psychological Medicine, vol. 23, pp.

977-985.

UKD-426

Stearns,J.; Brown,R.; and Neiswander,P.: 1983. A Pilot Study of

Human Response to General Aviation Aircraft Noise. NASA

CR-166053. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-217

Stowell,R.; and Makinson,C.: 1979. The Solent Study:

Technical Report. Social and Community Planning

Research, London.

UKD-309

Suga,S.; Oi,K.; Kondoh,Y.; and Miyamoto,S.: 1994. Study on

Annoyance and Trouble Caused by Pollution in a Residential

Area in a Megalopolis by Analyzing Free Response Data.

Inter-noise 94, pp. 1169-1172.

JPN-498

Sundvoll A.; and Teigum M.: 1998. Samordnet

Levekårsundersøkelse 1997 - Tverrsnittsundersøkelsen.(The

1997 Survey of Living Conditions – The Cross-Sectional

Study.). Working Paper 98/34. Statistics Norway, Oslo.

NOR-405

Surrey County Council: 1983. Survey of Gypsy Attitudes to Sites

With Particular Reference to Road Traffic Noise. Surrey

County Council, England.

UKD-284

Sutherland,L.C.; Braden,M.H.; and Colman,R.: 1973. A

Program for the Measurement of Environmental Noise in the

Community and Its Associated Human Response: Vol. I--A

Feasibility Test of Measurement Techniques. DOT-TST-74-

5. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

USA-090

Suzuki,T.: 1994. Complaints and Opinions on Neighborhood

Noise in Kawasaki City. Inter-noise 94, pp. 1173-1176.

JPN-501

Systems Control: 1978. Airport Noise Control and Land Use

Compatibility Study for Salt Lake City International Airport.

Systems Control, Inc., Anaheim, California.

USA-166

Systems Control: 1979. Will Rogers World Airport: Noise

Control and Land Use Compatibility Study. Systems Control,

Inc., Anaheim, California.

USA-179

Takahashi,Y.: 1991. A Study on the Community Response to

the Combined Noises of Railway and Road Traffic. (In

Japanese Only) (Master of Engineering Thesis), Muroran

Institute of Technology.

JPN-319

Takeshita,S.: 1984. A Thermodynamics-Like Theory of

Annoyance. J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn.(E), 4, vol. 5, pp. 263-266.

JPN-065

Tamura,A.: 1978. Community Response to Outdoor Noise at the

Sites Exposed to Road or Railway Noise. Architectural

Acoustics and Noise Control, 21, January, pp. 47-52.

JPN-123

Tamura,A.: 1994. Comparison of Community Response to

Oudoor Noise in the Areas Along Shinkansen and Ordinary

Railroad. Inter-noise 94, pp. 815-820.

JPN-493

Tamura,A.: 1998. An Environmental Index Based on

Inhabitants' Recognition of Sounds. Noise Effects '98: Noise

as a Public Health Problem (Seventh International

Congress), pp. 556-559.

JPN-492

Tamura,A.; and Gotoh,S.: 1977. Community Response to

Outdoor Noise at the Sites Exposed to Road or Railway

Noise. 9th International Congress on Acoustics, Madrid, 4-9

July.

JPN-123

Tamura,A.; and Gotoh,S.: 1980. Comparative Study of the

Structure of Attitude to Noise Problem. 10th International

Congress on Acoustics, Sydney, pp. C2-7.6.

JPN-152 JPN-138 JPN-177 JPN-139 JPN-140

Tarnopolsky,A.: 1978. Effects of Aircraft Noise on Mental

Health. J.Sound Vib., vol. 59, pp. 89-97.

UKD-111

Tarnopolsky,A.; Barker,S.M.; Wiggins,R.D.; and McLean,E.K.:

1978. The Effect of Aircraft Noise on the Mental Health of a

Community Sample: A Pilot Study. Psychological Medicine,

vol. 8, pp. 219-233.

UKD-111

Tarnopolsky,A.; Hand,D.J.; Barker,S.M.; and Jenkins,L.M.:

1980. Aircraft Noise, Annoyance, and Mental Health: A

Psychiatric Viewpoint. Noise as a Public Health Problem

(Third International Congress), ASHA Report 10, pp. 588-

593, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association,

Rockville, Maryland.

UKD-148

Tarnopolsky,A.; Jenkins,L.; Watkins,G.; and Hand,D.J.: 1980.

Prospects for Research into the Effects of Environmental

Noise on Health. Inter Research Council Seminar on Noise

Pollution, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,

Southampton.

UKD-148

Tarnopolsky,A.; and Morton-Williams,J.: 1980. Aircraft Noise

and Psychiatric Disorders. Social and Community Planning

Research, London.

UKD-111 UKD-148

Tarnopolsky,A.; Watkins,G.; and Hand,D.J.: 1980. Aircraft

Noise and Mental Health: I. Prevalence of Individual

Symptoms. Psychological Medicine, vol. 10, pp. 683-698.

UKD-148

Taylor Nelson & Associates: 1982. Survey of Public Reaction to

General Aviation Methodology. TN Report 100/763. Taylor

Nelson Group Limited, Surrey, England.

UKD-243
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-144-

Taylor,S.M.: 1982. A Comparison of Models to Predict

Annoyance Reactions to Noise From Mixed Sources. J.Sound

Vib., 1, vol. 81, pp. 123-138.

CAN-168

Taylor,S.M.: 1984. A Path Model of Aircraft Noise Annoyance.

J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 96, pp. 243-260.

CAN-168

Taylor,S.M.; Birnie,S.E.; and Hall,F.L.: 1978. Housing Type

and Tenure Effects on Reactions to Road Traffic Noise.

Environment and Planning A., vol. 10, pp. 1377-1386.

CAN-121

Taylor,S.M.; Birnie,S.E.; and Hall,F.L.: 1980. Annoyance Due

to General Aviation Noise. Dept. Geography, McMaster

Univ., Canada.

CAN-181

Taylor,S.M.; Gertler,M.; and Hall,F.L.: 1978. Regulatory

Implications of Individual Reactions to Road Traffic Noise.

57th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting,

McMaster Univ., Canada.

CAN-121

Taylor,S.M.; and Hall,F.L.: 1977. Factors Affecting Response to

Road Noise. Environment and Planning A., vol. 9, pp. 585-

597.

CAN-121

Taylor,S.M.; Hall,F.L.; and Birnie,S.E.: 1979. A Comparison of

Community Response to Aircraft Noise at Toronto

International and Oshawa Municipal Airports. Presented at

the Canadian Acoustical Association, Windsor, Ontario,

October 25.

CAN-168

Taylor,S.M.; Hall,F.L.; and Birnie,S.E.: 1980. Effect of

Background Levels on Community Responses to Aircraft

Noise. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 71, pp. 261-270.

CAN-168

Taylor,S.M.; Hall,F.L.; and Birnie,S.E.: 1981. A Comparison of

Community Response to Aircraft Noise at Toronto

International and Oshawa Municipal Airports. J.Sound Vib.,

2, vol. 77, pp. 233-244.

CAN-168

Taylor,S.M.; Hall,F.L.; and Birnie,S.E.: 1984. Applications of a

Probabilistic Model of Transportation Noise Annoyance.

Fourth Congress of the Federation of Acoustical Societies of

Europe, pp. 347-350.

CAN-236

Taylor,S.M.; Hall,F.L.; and Birnie,S.E.: 1987. Transportation

Noise Annoyance: Testing of a Probabilistic Model. J.Sound

Vib., vol. 117, pp. 95-113.

CAN-168

Thomas,J.R.; Namba,S.; Schick,S.; and Kuwano,S.: 1983. A

Cross-Cultural Study on Noise Annoyance: A Comparison

Between Britain, Germany and Japan. Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Fourth International Congress), pp. 871-

874, Centro Ricerche e Studi Amplifon, Milano, Italy.

GER-511 JPN-510 UKD-512

Thorpe,R.; and Holmes,T.: 1976. Economic Welfare Impacts of

Urban Noise. USEPA 600 5-76-002. U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency, Washington D.C.

USA-104

Tokuyama,T.; Minoura,K.; Hiramatsu,K.; Matsui,T.;

Miyakita,T.; Taira,K.; Osada,Y.; and Yamamoto,T.: 1998.

Disturbance of TV and Telephone Use by Aircraft Noise

Reported Around an Airfield in the Ryukyus. Inter-noise 98,

pp. 921-924.

JPN-444

Tokyoto Kogai Kenkyujo: 1971. Yokota Kitchi Shuhen Soon No

Jumin Seikatsu e No Eikyo Ni Tsuite. (Effect of Noise in the

Vicinity of Yokota Airbase on the Populace). Tokyoto Kogai

Kenkyujo, Japan.

JPN-046

Tokyoto Kogai Kenkyujo: 1972. Investigation on Aircraft Noise

Around Yokota Airbase. Tokyo Perfect Pollution Research

Agency, Tokyoto Kogai Kenkyujo, Japan.

JPN-046

Toward...: 1972. "Toward a Quality City" Inglewood,

California. Inglewood, California.

USA-040 USA-048

Tracor Inc: 1970. Public Reactions to Sonic Booms. NASA CR1665. NASA, Washington, D.C.

USA-023

Tracor Inc: 1971. Community Reaction to Airport Noise. vol. I,

NASA CR-1761; vol. II, NASA CR-111316. NASA,

Washington, D.C.

USA-022 USA-032

U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development: 1976.

Annual Housing Survey. [Reports on the Annual Housing

Survey Were Issued Each Year 1976-1983]. U.S.

Department of Housing and Urban Development: Office of

Policy Development and Research; U.S. Dept. of Commerce:

Bureau of the Census, Washington, D.C.

USA-095

Uptegrove,S.; Hall,F.L.; Taylor,S.M.; and Goulden,K.: 1977.

Road Traffic Noise and Community Response in the

Toronto-Hamilton Region. Final Report: Experience '76

Project. Dept. of Geography, McMaster Univ..

CAN-121

Utley,W.A.; Buller,I.B.; Keighley,E.C.; and Sargent,J.W.: 1986.

The Effectiveness and Acceptability of Measures for

Insulating Dwellings Against Traffic Noise. J.Sound Vib., 1,

vol. 109, pp. 1-18.

UKD-481

Utley,W.A.; and Keighley,E.C.: 1988. Community Response to

Neighborhood Noise. Noise as a Public Health Problem

(Fifth International Congress), vol. 3: Performance,

Behaviour, Animal, Combined Agents and Community

Responses, pp. 283-288, Swedish Council for Building

Research, Stockholm.

UKD-296

Utley,W.A.; Keighley,E.C.; and Sargent,J.W.: 1983. Insulating
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-145-

Dwellings Against Road Traffic Noise. 11th International

Congress on Acoustics, Lyon-Toulouse, Paris, vol. 7, pp.

245-248, Paris.

UKD-481

Vadillo,E.G.; Herreros,J.; and Walker,J.G.: 1996. Subjective

Reaction to Structurally Radiated Sound From Underground

Railways: Field Results. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 193, pp. 65-74.

SPA-408

Vallet,M.; Abramowitch,J.M.; and Lambert,J.: 1977. Impact

Des Ecrans Anti Bruit Sur La Gêne Des Riverains. (Impact

of Noise Barrier Applications on the Annoyance of People).

Institute de Recherche des Transports, Bron, France.

FRA-124

Vallet,M.; Abramowitch,J.M.; and Lambert,J.: 1979. Impact of

Noise Barrier on People Annoyance: Case Study at L'Hay

Les Roses. Inter-noise 79, pp. 865-868.

FRA-124

Vallet,M.; Maurin,M.; Page,M.A.; Favre,B.; and Pachiaudi,G.:

1978. Annoyance From and Habituation to Road Traffic

Noise From Urban Expressways. J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 60,

pp. 423-440.

FRA-092

Vallet,M.; Pachiaudi,G.; Bruyere,J.; Signolles,C.; Tanguy,Y.;

Depitre,A.; Fischl,M.; Francois,J.; and Abramowitch,J.M.:

1986. Réactions De La Communaute Au Bruit Des Avions.

(Translation Available in: Reactions of the Community to

Aircraft Noise. NASA TT-20513). INRETS-Laboratoire

Energie Nuisances, Bron, France.

FRA-239

Vallet,M.; Pachiaudi,G.; Depitre,A.; Tanguy,Y.; and

Francois,J.: 1988. Community Reactions to Aircraft and

Residual Noise. Noise as a Public Health Problem (Fifth

International Congress), vol. 3: Performance, Behaviour,

Animal, Combined Agents and Community Responses, pp.

289-294, Swedish Council for Building Research,

Stockholm.

FRA-239

Vallet,M.; Vernet,I.; Champelovier,P.; and Maurin,M.: 1996. A

Road Traffic Noise Index for the Night Time. Inter-noise 96,

pp. 2345-2350, Liverpool, England.

FRA-364

Vallet,M.; Vincent,B.; Champelovier,P.; Vernet,I.;

Annequin,C.; Olivier,D.; and Baez,D.: 1992. Efficacite Des

Barrieres Acoustiques Routieres Pour Les Riverains

(Efficiency of Road Noise Barriers With Respect to

Residents). Proceedings of 17th AICB Congress, pp. 25-32,

Prague.

FRA-346

van den Berg,R.: 1993. Noise From the Marnewaard Shooting

Range A Review of Sound and Annoyance Measures. Internoise 93, pp. 1145-1148.

NET-354

van den Eijk,J.; Kasteleijn,M.L.; and Kosten,C.W.: 1956.

Review of the Netherlands Study of Noise Control in

Multiple Dwellings. Second ICA Congress, Cambridge,

Massachusetts, June 17-23, p. 155.

NET-002

van Dongen,J.E.F.: 1980a. Bejaardenoorden En Geluidhinder -

Met Name Afkomstig Van Het Wegverkeer. (Houses for the

Aged and Noise Annoyance - Especially From Road Traffic).

Report D 49. IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-196

van Dongen,J.E.F.: 1980b. Noise Annoyance Due to Road

Traffic Noise in Homes for the Aged. 10th International

Congress on Acoustics..

NET-196

van Dongen,J.E.F.: 1981a. Evaluation of Noise Abatement

Measures. Inter-noise 81, pp. 813-816.

NET-106 NET-258

van Dongen,J.E.F.: 1981b. Geluidhinder in Bejaardenoorden.

(Noise Annoyance in Homes for the Aged). Report ICG-VLDR-24-06. Ministerie van Volksgezondheid en

Milieuhygiëne, Leidschendam.

NET-196

van Dongen,J.E.F.: 1982. Beleving Van Geluidwerende

Voorzieningen Tegen Snelverkeerslawaai in De

Woonsituatie -Een Vergelijkende Studie-. (Evaluation of

Noise Abatement Measures Against Highway Traffic Noise -

A Comparative Study -). IMG-TNO report D-65. IMG-TNO,

Delft.

NET-106 NET-258

van Dongen,J.E.F.: 1984. Horen En Hinder Van Sanitaire

Geluiden En Installatiegeluiden Binnen En Tussen

Nieuwgebouwde Eensgezinswoningen En Gestapelde

Woningen. (Hearing and Annoyance of Sanitary and

Installation Noises Within and Between Newly Built

Terraced Houses and Apartments). IMG-TNO Report D 76.

IMG-TNO, Delft.

NET-263

van Dongen,J.E.F.: 1985. Noise Annoyance From Sanitary

Appliances, Ventilators and Gas Burner Furnaces in

Dwellings. Inter-noise 85, pp. 1017-1020.

NET-263

van Dongen,J.E.F.: 1991. Belevingsonderzoek Naar

Geluidhinder in De Omgeving Van De 25mm Schietbaau Bij

Marnewaard (Lauwersmeer). [Survey of Noise Annoyance

Perception in the Surroundings of the 25 Mm Shooting

Range Near Marnewaard (Lauwersmeer)]. Report NIPG

91.011. Netherlands Institute for Preventive Health Care -

TNO, Leiden.

NET-354

van Dongen,J.E.F.; Steenbekkers,J.H.M.; and Vos,H.: 1999. De

Kwaliteit Van Deleefomgeving Rond Groningen Airport

Eelde (The Quality of Life Around Groningen Airport

Eelde). PG/VGZ/99.031. TNO Preventie en Gezondheid,

Leiden, The Netherlands.

NET-379

van Dongen,J.E.F.; and van den Berg,R.: 1980. De Gewenning
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-146-

Aan De Nieuwe Spoorlijn Te Zoetermeer. (The Habituation

to the Noise of a Newly Opened Railroad at

Zoetermeer)(Translation Available in: Habituation to the

Noise of a Newly-Opened Railroad at Zoetermeer. FTDID(RS)T-0999-89. Foreign Technology Division, Air Force

Systems Command. January 1990). Report D 50. IMG-TNO,

Delft.

NET-195

van Dongen,J.E.F.; Vos,H.; van Luxemburg,L.C.J.; and

Raijmakers,T.M.J.: 1998. Dosis-Effect Relaties Voor Geluid

Van Buren (Dose-Effect Relations to Noise From

Neighbours). TNO-report 98.002. TNO Prevention and

Health, Leiden.

NET-462

van Niekerk,C.G.; and Muller,J.L.: 1969. Assessment of

Aircraft Noise Disturbance. The Aeronautical Journal, vol.

73, May 1969, pp. 383-396.

SAF-028

Vernet,I.; Vallet,M.; Vincent,B.; Champelovier,P.;

Annequin,C.; Baez,D.; and Olivier,D.: 1992. Efficacite Des

Barrieres Acoustiques Routieres Pour Les Riverains

(Efficiency of Road Noise Barriers With Respect to

Residents). Proceedings of Euro-noise 92, vol. 1, pp. 97-104,

Institute of Acoustics, St. Albans.

FRA-346

Vincent,B.; and Champelovier,P.: 1992. Attente Et Vecu Des

Ecrans Acoustiques. Eurosymposium: Maitrise du Bruit

Routier en Milieu Urbain (The Mitigation of Traffic Noise in

Urban Areas), Nantes.

FRA-346

Vincent,B.; and Champelovier,P.: 1993. Changes in the

Acoustic Environment: Need for an Extensive Evaluation of

Annoyance. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public Health

Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 425-428,

INRETS, Arcueil, France.

FRA-346

Vincent,B.; Vallet,M.; Olivier,D.; and Paque,G.: 2000.

Evaluation of Variations of the Annoyance Due to Aircraft

Noise. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 3, pp. 1382-1385, Nice, France.

FRA-395

Vogt,J.; and Kastner,M.: 1999. Sustainable Airport

Development: Investigating Psychological and HealthRelated Noise Effects and Potential Counter-Measures. Internoise 99, vol. 2, pp. 1223-1226.

GER-466

Vogt,J.; and Kastner,M.: 2000. The Role of Information Policy

in Annoyance Generation and Reduction. Inter-noise 2000,

Nice, France.

GER-466

Vos,J.: 1985. A Review of Field Studies on Annoyance Due to

Impulse and Road-Traffic Sounds. Inter-noise 85, pp. 1029-

1032.

NET-232

Vos,J.: 1999a. Startle Response to Shooting Sounds. Inter-noise

99, pp. 1255-1260, Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

NET-460

Vos,J.: 1999b. Veldonderzoek Naar Schrikreacties Ten Gevolge

Van Schietgeluid (A Field Survey on Startle Reactions to

Shooting Sounds). TNO Report TM99A041. TNO Human

Factors, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.

NET-460

Vos,J.; and Buchta,E.: 2000. Quantification of Context Effects

in the Determination of Source-Specific Annoyance Ratings

for Shooting and Road-Traffic Sounds. Inter-noise 2000, vol.

3, pp. 1597-1602, Nice, France.

GER-278 GER-454

VTN Consolidated: 1980. Airport Master Plan- ANCLUC Plan

for John Wayne Airport, Orange County, Volume II:

ANCLUC Plan Draft Report. VTN Consolidated, Inc..

USA-207

Walker,J.G.: 1986. CEC Joint Study of Community Reactions to

Aircraft Noise: Residual Noise Measurements in the Vicinity

of Glasgow Airport. ISVR Memorandum no. 661. ISVR,

Univ. of Southampton.

UKD-238

Walker,J.G.; and Fields,J.M.: 1977. Preliminary Results of the

Effects of Railway Noise on Nearby Residents. ISVR Tech.

Report No. 90. Institute of Sound and Vibration Research,

Southampton, England.

UKD-116

Walker,J.G.; and Fields,J.M.: 1978. Railway Noise: Noise

Measurement Techniques and Annoyance Reactions.

Institute of Acoustics, September 1978, pp. 17-16-1-17-16-4.

UKD-116

Walker,J.G.; and Fields,J.M.: 1980. Community Response to

Railway Noise in Great Britain. Acoustics 80: Institute of

Acoustics Meeting, April 8-11 1980, pp. 85-88.

UKD-116

Walters,D.: 1970. Annoyance Due to Railway Noise in

Residential Areas, in D. V. Center (ed), Architectural

Psychology. pp. 56-61, R.J.B.A. Publications, Ltd., England.

UKD-029 UKD-038

Wanner,H.U.; Wehrli,B.; Bakke,P.; Nemecek,J.; Turrian,V.;

and Grandjean,E.: 1977. Effects of Road Traffic Noise on

Residents. Inter-noise 77, p. B698-B702.

SWI-158 SWI-133

Wanner,H.U.; Wehrli,B.; Nemecek,J.; and Turrian,V.: 1977.

Die Belästigung Der Anwohner Verkehrsreicher Strassen

Durch Lärm Und Luftverunreinigungen. (Translation

Available in: Annoyance Due to Noise and Air Pollution to

the Residents of Heavily Frequented Streets. NASA TM75496). Sozial-Und Präventivmedizin, vol. 22, pp. 108-115.

SWI-158

Waters,D.M.; and Bottom,C.G.: 1971. The Influence of

Background Noise on Disturbance Due to Aircraft. 7th

International Congress on Acoustics, Budapest, vol. 2, pp.

521-524.

UKD-033
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-147-

Watkins,G.; Tarnopolsky,A.; and Jenkins,L.M.: 1981. Aircraft

Noise and Mental Health: II. Use of Medicines and Health

Care Services. Psychological Medicine, vol. 11, pp. 155-168.

UKD-148

Watts,G.R.: 1984. Vibration Nuisance From Road Traffic -

Results of a 50 Site Survey. TRRL Report LR 1119.

Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne,

England.

UKD-270

Watts,G.R.: 1985. Subjective Responses to Traffic Noise and

Noise Induced Vibration Effects in Dwellings. Inter-noise

85, pp. 1009-1012.

UKD-270

Watts,G.R.: 1987. Traffic Induced Ground-Borne Vibrations in

Dwellings. TRRL Report RR-102. Transport and Road

Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, England.

UKD-270

Webb,D.R.B.; and Warren,C.H.E.: 1967. An Investigation of the

Effect of Bangs on the Subjective Reaction of a Community.

J.Sound Vib., 3, vol. 6, pp. 375-385.

UKD-010

Wehrli,B.; and Grandjean,E.: 1979. Die Wirkungen Des

Strassenverkehrslärms: Grundlagen Für Massnahmen Und

Planung. (The Annoyance by Traffic Noise: Basis for

Measurement and Planning). 6th Saguf-Symposium on 4

November 1978. Institute für Hygiene und

Arbeitsphysiologie Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule,

Zurich.

SWI-173

Wehrli,B.; Huser,S.; Egli,H.; Bakke,P.; and Grandjean,E.: 1976.

Wohnen Im Neubau - Eine Interdisziplinäre Untersuchung

Über Die Wohnbedingungen in Zürcher Neubauwohnungen

Und Deren Beurteilung Durch Die Bewohner. (An

Interdisciplinary Investigation of the Living Conditions in

New Dwellings in Zurich and People's Judgement to These).

Verlag Paul Haupt, Bern.

SWI-133

Wehrli,B.; and Nemecek,J.: 1979. Effects of the Noise of Street

Traffic in Switzerland, a Review of Four Surveys. Dept. of

Hygiene and Applied Psychology, Swiss Federal Institute of

Technology, Zurich.

SWI-173 SWI-158 SWI-133 SWI-053

Wehrli,B.; Nemecek,J.; Turrian,V.; Hofmann,R.; and

Wanner,H.U.: 1978. Auswirkungen Des

Straßenverkehrslärm in Der Nacht. (Translation Available

in: Effects of Street Traffic Noise in the Night. NASA TM75495). Kampf Dem Lärm, vol. 25, pp. 138-149.

SWI-173

Wehrli,B.; Nemecek,J.; Turrian,V.; Wanner,H.U.; and

Hofmann,R.: 1978. Störwirkungen Des

Strassenverkehrslärms in Der Nacht. (Annoyance by Traffic

Noise by Night). Institut für Hygiene und Arbeitsphysiologie,

Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zürich.

SWI-173

Weinstein,N.D.: 1978. Individual Differences in Reactions to

Noise: A Longitudinal Study in a College Dormitory.

J.Appl.Psych., vol. 63, pp. 458-466.

USA-300

Weinstein,N.D.: 1980. Individual Differences in Critical

Tendencies and Noise Annoyance. J.Sound Vib., 2, vol. 68,

pp. 241-248.

USA-156

Weinstein,N.D.: 1982. Community Noise Problems: Evidence

Against Adaptation. J.Env.Psych., vol. 2, pp. 87-97.

USA-156

Wilcox,D.J.: 1978. Community and Individual Reactions to

Noise Exposure From Flowing, Congested, and Motorway

Traffic (M.Sc. Dissertation), Electrical Engineering Dept.,

University of Salford, England.

UKD-162

Willigers,L.H.J.: 1979. Verantwoording Proefproject -

Meetresultaten in De Deelprojecten. (Review of the Research

Project - Results of the Measurements Taken in the SubProjects). Report LL-WR-11-11. Interdepartementale

Commissie Geluidhinder, Leidschendam, Netherlands.

NET-115 NET-149

Wilson,A.: 1963. Noise: Final Report. Cmnd. 2056. HMSO,

London.

UKD-008

Windle,R.E.: 1977. Investigation of Non-Response in an

Interview Survey (M.Sc. Dissertation), Dept. of Social

Statistics, Univ. of Southampton, England.

UKD-116

Wolsink,M.; and Sprengers,M.: 1993. Windturbine Noise: A

New Environmental Threat? Noise and Man '93: Noise as a

Public Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2,

pp. 235-238, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

DEN-333 GER-335 NET-334

Wrigley,N.: 1976a. An Analysis of the Aircraft Noise

Expectations of Migrants into an Area Around Luton

Airport. ISVR Research Memo 560. Univ. Southampton,

England.

UKD-112

Wrigley,N.: 1976b. Distance From an Airport and the Noise

Expectations of Migrants. J.Sound Vib., 1, vol. 49, pp. 137-

140.

UKD-112

Wyle Research: 1977. An Attitudinal Assessment of Community

Noise: Volume I: A Critique of Selected Noise-Related

Attitudinal Surveys; Appendix C: Summary of 11 Additional

Surveys. Wyle Research, El Segundo, California.

Yaden,D.V.; and West,D.L.: 1972. Portland International

Airport Runway 2-20 Study: Survey of North Shore (Clark

County) Residents. Yaden and West, Portland, Oregon.

USA-060

Yamada,I.: 2000. Issues of Airport Noise in Japan Early in the

21st Century. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 5, pp. 2777-2783, Nice,

France.
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-148-

JPN-491

Yamada,I.; and Kaku,J.: 1996. Changes in People's Attitudes

Toward Airport Resulting From Decrease in Number of

Flights. Inter-noise 96, vol. 4, pp. 2079-2084.

JPN-491

Yamamoto,T.; Takagi,K.; Hashimoto,K.; and Yoneda,A.: 1970.

Survey Report on Intermittent Industrial Noise (Second

Report), Reaction of the Populace Based on Written

Response. Nihon Koeishi, 5, vol. 17, pp. 261-268.

JPN-005

Yamamoto,T.: 1999. A Report on the Aircraft Noise As a Public

Health Problem in Okinawa (English Summary Available at

Http://Www.Pref.Okinawa.Jp/Okinawa_Kankyo/Souon/Pdf_

e/Index.Html). Department of Culture and Environmental

Affairs, Okinawa Perfectual Government, Okinawa.

JPN-353 JPN-444 JPN-445

Yamanaka,K.: 1982. Criteria for Acceptable Levels of the

Shinkansen Super Express Train Noise and Vibrations in

Residential Areas. J.Sound Vib., 4, vol. 84, pp. 573-591.

JPN-201

Yamashita,T.; Yano,T.; and Izumi,K.: 1996. Effects of a Belt of

Trees on Road Traffic Noise Annoyance. Inter-noise 96, pp.

2307-2310.

JPN-452

Yano,T.; Izumi,K.; Rylander,R.; and Bjorkman,M.: 1994.

Cross-Cultural Study on Community Response to Traffic

Noise (2): Surveys in Gothenburg, Sweden and Kumamoto,

Japan. Inter-noise 94, pp. 1149-1152.

JPN-451 SWE-420

Yano,T.; Izumi,K.; Yamashita,T.; Dankittikul,W.; and

Kurosawa,K.: 1993. Cross-Regional Comparison of

Community Response to Road Traffic Noise in Hokkaido

and Kyushu, Japan. Noise and Man '93: Noise as a Public

Health Problem (Sixth International Congress), vol. 2, pp.

217-220, INRETS, Arcueil, France.

JPN-453

Yano,T.; Izumi,K.; Yamashita,T.; and Tabata,T.: 1997.

Comparison of Community Response to Railway Noises

Obtained With Different Category Scales. (In Japanese

Only). J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn., 1, vol. 53, pp. 13-23.

JPN-370

Yano,T.; Kurosawa,K.; and Kawai,K.: 1997. Effects of Noise

Barriers on Annoyance Caused by Road Traffic From

Kyushu Highway. Inter-noise 97, pp. 1253-1256.

JPN-450

Yano,T.; Murakami,Y.; Kawai,K.; and Sato,T.: 1998.

Comparison of Responses to Road Traffic and Railway

Noises. Noise Effects ‘98: Noise as a Public Health Problem

(Seventh International Congress), vol. 2, pp. 582-585.

JPN-369 JPN-370

Yano,T.; Sato,T.; Björkman,M.; and Rylander,R.: 2000.

Comparison of Community Responses to Road Traffic Noise

in Japan and Sweden, Part II: Causal Modeling by Path

Analysis. Inter-noise 2000, vol. 5, pp. 3195-3200, Nice,

France.

JPN-369 JPN-382 SWE-368

Yano,T.; Sato,T.; Kawai,K.; and Kurosawa,K.: 1997.

Comparison of Community Response to Road Traffic and

Railway Noises. (In Japanese Only). J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn., 7,

vol. 54, pp. 489-496.

JPN-369 JPN-370

Yano,T.; Yamashita,T.; and Izumi,K.: 1991a. Community

Response to Road Traffic Noise in Kumamoto. J.Sound Vib.,

vol. 151, pp. 487-495.

JPN-453

Yano,T.; Yamashita,T.; and Izumi,K.: 1991b. Comparison of

Community Response to Road Traffic Noise in Warmer and

Colder Areas in Japan. Inter-noise 91, pp. 903-906.

JPN-453

Yano,T.; Yamashita,T.; and Izumi,K.: 1996. Social Survey on

Community Response to Railway Noise - Comparison of

Responses Obtained With Different Annoyance Scales. Internoise 96, pp. 2299-2302.

JPN-370

Yano,T.; Yamashita,T.; and Izumi,K.: 1997. Comparison of

Community Annoyance From Railway Noise Evaluated by

Different Category Scales. J.Sound Vib., vol. 205, pp. 505-

511.

JPN-370

Yeowart,N.S.; Wilcox,D.J.; and Rossall,A.W.: 1977a.

Community Reactions to Noise From Freely Flowing Traffic,

Motorway Traffic and Congested Traffic Flow. J.Sound Vib.,

1, vol. 53, pp. 127-145.

UKD-162

Yeowart,N.S.; Wilcox,D.J.; and Rossall,A.W.: 1977b. Nuisance

Caused by Traffic Noise in Urban Areas. Institute of

Acoustics, May 1977, p. 12.4.1-12.4.4.

UKD-162

Yoshida,T.: 1987. Effects of Road Traffic Noise on Residents

(In Japanese). Proceedings of the Spring Meeting of the

Acoustical Society of Japan, pp. 433-434.

JPN-503

Yoshida,T.: 1991. A Study on Noise and Health of Inhabitants

(In Japanese). Proceedings, Acoustical Society of Japan, vol.

91-36, pp. 1-7.

JPN-503 JPN-504

Yoshida,T.; and Nakamura,S.: 1988a. Subjective Ratings of

Health State and Railway Noise. J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn.(E), vol.

9, pp. 181-190.

JPN-340

Yoshida,T.; and Nakamura,S.: 1988b. Subjective Ratings of

Health Status and Railway Noise. J.Sound Vib., vol. 127, pp.

593-598.

JPN-340

Yoshida,T.; and Nakamura,S.: 1994. Community Noise and

Health of Inhabitants. Inter-noise 90, vol. 2, pp. 1125-1128,

Gothenburg.

JPN-504
BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

-149-

Yoshida,T.; and Nakamura,S.: 1989. Effect of Noise Events on

Inhabitants' Reactions to Railway Noise.

J.Acoust.Soc.Jpn.(E), 6, vol. 10, pp. 339-348.

JPN-340

Yoshida,T.; Osada,Y.; Kawaguchi,T.; Hoshiyama,Y.;

Yoshida,K.; and Yamamoto,K.: 1997. Effects of Road

Traffic Noise on Inhabitants of Tokyo. J.Sound Vib., 4, vol.

205, pp. 517-522.

JPN-496

Yoshida,T.; Tokuyama,H.; and Nakamura,S.: 1994. Noise and

Subjective Symptoms of Inhabitants. Inter-noise 94, pp.

1137-1140.

JPN-340 JPN-503 JPN-504

Yu,W.: 1987. Accuracy of Measurement for Assessing Human

Response to Noise. Inter-noise 87, pp. 985-988.

KOR-295

Yu,W.: 1988. Disturbance of Daily Activities Due to Traffic

Noise. WESTPAC III (Third Western/Pacific Regional

Acoustics Conference, Shanghai, China, November 1988),

pp. 541-544.

KOR-295

Zamarin,D.M.; Langdon,L.E.; and Gabriel,R.F.: 1971. A

Summary of Two Community Surveys on the Effects of

Aircraft Noise. Report No. MDC J5033. Douglas Aircraft

Co..

USA-027 USA-031

Zeichart,K.: 1999. Noise Annoyance From High-Speed Trains

in Germany. Inter-noise 99, pp. 1337-1342, Fort Lauderdale,

Florida.

GER-467

Zeichart,K.; Kilcher,H.; Herrmann,W.; Hils,T.; and Gawlik,M.:

2000. Untersuchung Zur Lästigkeit Von

Hochgeschwindigkeitszügen Am Beispiel Der Neu- Und

Ausbaustrecke Hannover-Göttingen - Kurzfassung - (Study

of the Nuisance Caused by High-Speed Trains With

Reference to the Hanover-to-Göttingen NewlyBuilt/Upgraded Line). Deutsche Bahn AG, München.

GER-467

Zhao,P.; and Chen,G.: 1992. The Subjective Reaction to

Roadtraffic Noise. 14th International Congress on Acoustics,

pp. E5-8, Beijing.

CHI-386

Zheng,D.; Cai,X.; and Chen,T.: 1986. Chinese Definition of

Loudness, Noisiness and Annoyance and the Attitude

Towards Noise. Inter-noise 86, pp. 855-860.

CHI-514 JPN-510

Zoric,D.; Lukic,D.; and Gvozdenovic,S.: 1982. Noise Control

Programme For the Airport "Split" Based on the

Interviewing of the Residents in the Surrounding

Settlements, Analysis of the Existing Take-Off and Landing

Procedures and Direct Aircraft Noise Measurements. Internoise 82, pp. 539-541.

YUG-234

Zoric,D.; and Miroslav,H.: 1981. Reactions of the Inhabitants of

the Neighboring Residential Areas of the Airport Split to the

Aircraft Noise. Jugoslovenski Aerokosmonauticki Kongres,

Belgrade.

YUG-234
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved

OMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data

sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other

aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and

Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188),

Washington, DC 20503.

1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE

December 2001

3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED

Contractor Report

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE

An Updated Catalog of 521 Social Surveys of Residents' Reactions to

Environmental Noise (1943-2000)

5. FUNDING NUMBERS

C NAS1-20103

WU 538-03-15

6. AUTHOR(S)

James M. Fields 

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

 Wyle Laboratories

 El Segundo, California

 

 

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION

REPORT NUMBER

 

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Langley Research Center

Hampton, VA 23681-2199

10. SPONSORING/MONITORING

AGENCY REPORT NUMBER

NASA/CR-2001-211257

11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

NASA Langley technical monitor: Kevin P. Shepherd

12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Unclassified-Unlimited

Subject Category 71 Distribution: Standard

Availability: NASA CASI (301) 621-0390

12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE

13. ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 words)

This report describes all social surveys of residents' reactions to environmental noise in residential areas that

have been located in English language publications from 1943 to December of 2000. A total of 521 surveys are

described. The surveys are indexed by country, noise source, and date of survey. The publications and reports

from each survey are listed in a bibliography.

14. SUBJECT TERMS

Environmental Noise, Aircraft Noise, Social Surveys

15. NUMBER OF PAGES

155

 16. PRICE CODE

A08

17. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

OF REPORT

Unclassified

18. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

OF THIS PAGE

Unclassified

19. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

 OF ABSTRACT

Unclassified

20. LIMITATION

 OF ABSTRACT

 UL

NSN 7540-01-280-5500 Standard Form 298 (Rev. 2-89)

Prescribed by ANSI Std. Z-39-18

298-102