9584 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Notices 

flexibility analysis if a rule would have 

a significant economic impact, either 

detrimental or beneficial on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The proposed shooting closure does not 

pertain specifically to commercial or 

governmental entities of any size, but to 

public recreational use of specific lands. 

Therefore, the BLM has determined 

under the RFA that these interim 

supplementary rules would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act (SBREFA) 

This proposed shooting closure does 

not constitute a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined 

by U.S.C. 804(2). The proposed shooting 

closure merely contains rules of conduct 

for recreational use of certain public 

lands. The proposed shooting closure 

has no effect on business, commercial, 

or industrial use of the public lands. 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The proposed shooting closure does 

not impose an unfunded mandate on 

state, local, or Tribal governments in the 

aggregate, or the private sector, of more 

than $100 million per year; nor does it 

have a significant or unique effect on 

small governments. The propsed 

shooting closure does not require 

anything of state, local, or Tribal 

governments. Therefore, the BLM is not 

required to prepare a statement 

containing the information required by 

the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 

U.S.C. 1532 et seq.). 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference With 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights (Takings) 

The proposed shooting closure is not 

a government action capable of 

interfering with constitutionally 

protected property rights. The proposed 

shooting closure does not address 

property rights in any form, and does 

not cause the impairment of anybody’s 

property rights. Therefore, the 

Department of the Interior has 

determined that this proposed shooting 

closure would not cause a taking of 

private property or require further 

discussion of takings implications under 

this Executive Order. 

Executive Order 13132 Federalism 

The proposed shooting closure will 

not have a substantial direct effect on 

the states, on the relationship between 

the national government and the states, 

or on the distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. The proposed 

shooting closure affects land in only one 

state, Nevada. Therefore, the BLM has 

determined that the proposed shooting 

closure does not have sufficient 

Federalism implications to warrant 

preparation of a Federalism Assessment. 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform 

Under Executive Order 12988, the 

Office of the Solicitor has determined 

that the proposed shooting closure will 

not unduly burden the judicial system 

and that the requirements of sections 

3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order are met. 

The proposed shooting closure includes 

rules of conduct and prohibited acts, but 

they are straightforward and not 

confusing, and their enforcement should 

not unreasonably burden the United 

States Magistrate who will try any 

persons cited for violating them. 

Executive Order 13175, Consultation 

and Coordination With Indian Tribal 

Governments 

In accordance with Executive Order 

13175, the BLM has found that this 

proposed shooting closure does not 

include policies that have Tribal 

implications. The proposed shooting 

closure does not affect lands held for the 

benefit of Indians, Aleuts or Eskimos. 

Paperwork Reduction Action 

The proposed shooting closure does 

not contain information collection 

requirements that the Office of 

Management and Budget must approve 

under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq. rules requiring 

special recreation permits for certain 

recreational users will involve 

collection of information contained on 

BLM Special Recreation Permit form 

2930–1. This permit form has been 

approved under OMB Number 10004–

0119. 

Author 

The principal author of these interim 

supplementary rules is Erika 

Schumacher, Chief Ranger, Las Vegas 

Field Office, Bureau of Land 

Management. 

Closure Area 

Public lands affected are within the 

following described area: Township 21 

Range 53 Sections 14, 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 

26, 27, 34, 35, 36; Township 21 Range 

54 Sections 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 

31, 32, 33, 34, Township 22 Range 53 

Sections 1, 2 and 12; Township 22 

Range 54 Sections 5, 6 and 7, Mount 

Diablo Meridian, Nevada. 

Maps Depicting the area affected by 

this closure order are available for 

public inspection at the Las Vegas Field 

Office, Bureau of Land Management, 

4701 N. Torrey Pines Drive, Las Vegas, 

Nevada. 

Exceptions to Closure 

a. Hunting with a valid state hunting 

license and in accordance with State 

laws, and 

b. Law Enforcement personnel in the 

performance of their duties. 

Closure Restrictions 

Unless otherwise authorized, within 

the closure area no person shall: 

a. Discharge any firearm. 

b. Possess an unregistered firearm, 

when registration of a firearm is 

required by the State of Nevada or Nye 

County. 

c. Possess an illegally obtained 

firearm. 

d. Possess any firearm in violation of 

Federal, state or county regulations. 

e. Unless specifically addressed by 

regulations set forth in 43 CFR, the laws 

and regulations of the State of Nevada 

and Nye County shall govern the use 

and possession of firearms. Such state 

and county laws and regulations, which 

are now or may later be in effect are 

hereby adopted and made part of this 

closure. 

Definitions 

Firearm: Any weapon capable of 

firing a projectile including but not 

limited to rifle, shotgun, handgun, BBgun, pellet gun, etc. 

This closure is issued under the 

authority of 43 CFR 8364.1. Violations 

of any terms, conditions, or restrictions 

contained in this closure order, may 

subject the violator to citation or arrest, 

with penalty of fine and imprisonment 

or both as specified by law. 

Juan Palma, 

Field Manager, Las Vegas Field Office. 

[FR Doc. E7–3642 Filed 3–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–40–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

Bureau of Land Management 

[CO–120–1610–DO–022C] 

Notice of Intent to Prepare a Resource 

Management Plans for the Kremmling 

and Glenwood Springs Field Office and 

Associated Environmental Impact 

Statement, Colorado 

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, 

Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land 

Management (BLM) Kremmling and 

Glenwood Springs Field Office, 

Colorado intends to prepare Resource 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Notices 9585 

Management Plans (RMP) with an 

associated Environmental Impact 

Statement (EIS) for the Kremmling and 

Glenwood Springs planning areas and 

by this notice is announcing public 

scoping meetings. The Field Offices will 

simultaneously revise their respective 

RMPs for the BLM-administered public 

lands within each Field Office under 

one EIS. The RMPs will replace the 

existing Kremmling and Glenwood 

Springs RMPs. 

DATES: This notice initiates the public 

scoping process. Comments and 

resource information should be 

submitted to the BLM within 60 days of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. The BLM will announce 

public scoping meetings to identify 

relevant issues through local news 

media, newsletters, and the BLM Web 

site (http://www.blm.gov/rmp/co/kfogsfo) at least 15 days prior to the first 

meeting. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit written 

comments by any of the following 

methods: 

• Web site: (http://www.blm.gov/rmp/ 

co/kfo-gsfo). 

• E-mail: cormpkg@blm.gov. 

• Fax: (970) 724–9590. 

• Bureau of Land Management, 

Kremmling Field Office, Joe Stout, RMP 

Project Manager, P.O. Box 68, 

Kremmling, CO 80459. 

Documents pertinent to this proposal 

may be examined at the Kremmling and 

Glenwood Springs Field Offices. 

Respondents’ comments, including their 

names and street addresses, will be 

available for public review at the 

Kremmling Field Office during regular 

business hours from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

and at the Glenwood Springs Field 

Office during regular business hours 

from 7:45 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday 

through Friday, except holidays, and 

may be published as part of the EIS. 

Individual respondents may request 

confidentiality. If you wish to withhold 

your name or street address from public 

review or from disclosure under the 

Freedom of Information Act, you must 

state this prominently at the beginning 

of your written comments. Such 

requests will be honored to the extent 

allowed by law. All submissions from 

organizations and businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, will be 

available for public inspection in their 

entirety. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information and\or to have your 

name added to our mailing list, contact 

Joe Stout, Kremmling Field Office, at 

(970) 724–3003. Comments may be sent 

electronically to cormpkg@blm.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Kremmling planning area is located in 

Grand, Eagle, Jackson, Larimer, and 

Summit Counties, Colorado. The 

Glenwood Springs planning area is 

located in Eagle, Garfield, Mesa, Pitkin, 

Rio Blanco, and Routt Counties, 

Colorado. This planning activity 

encompasses approximately 964,000 

acres of BLM-administered public lands. 

The plan will fulfill the needs and 

obligations set forth by the National 

Environmental Policy Act, the Federal 

Land Policy and Management Act, and 

BLM management policies. The BLM 

will work collaboratively with 

interested parties to identify the 

management decisions that are best 

suited to local, regional, and national 

needs and concerns. 

The purpose of the public scoping 

process is to determine relevant issues 

that will influence the scope of the 

environmental analysis and alternatives. 

These issues also guide the planning 

process. You may submit comments on 

issues and planning criteria in writing 

to the BLM at any public scoping 

meeting, or you may submit them to the 

BLM using one of the methods listed in 

the ADDRESSES section above. Individual 

respondents may request 

confidentiality. If you wish to withhold 

your name or street address from public 

review or from disclosure under the 

Freedom of Information Act, you must 

state this prominently at the beginning 

of your written comments. Such 

requests will be honored to the extent 

allowed by law. All submissions from 

organizations and businesses, and from 

individuals identifying themselves as 

representatives or officials of 

organizations or businesses, will be 

available for public inspection in their 

entirety. 

Preliminary issues and management 

concerns have been identified by BLM 

personnel, other agencies, and in 

meetings with individuals and user 

groups. They represent the BLM’s 

knowledge to date regarding the existing 

issues and concerns with current land 

management. The EIS will describe and 

analyze a range of alternatives, 

comprised of the No Action alternative 

(continued management) and a number 

of action alternatives, each of which 

will describe options for addressing the 

major issues. The major issues that will 

be addressed in this planning effort 

include: 

• Oil and gas development; 

• Range health/upland management; 

• Water/riparian issues; 

• Increased recreation demands and 

uses; 

• Comprehensive travel management 

and transportation; 

• High concentration of cultural sites; 

• Maintaining habitat for Sage Grouse 

and Sagebrush obligate species; and 

• Rapidly expanding urban interface 

areas. 

Issues identified through public 

comments will be placed into one of 

four categories: 

1. Issues to be resolved in the plan; 

2. Issues to be resolved through policy 

or administrative action; 

3. Issues beyond the scope of the plan; 

or 

4. Issues that have already been 

addressed but should be better 

communicated to the issue holder. 

Rationale will be provided for each 

issue placed in categories two, three, 

and four. The public is encouraged to 

help identify these questions and 

concerns during the scoping phase. 

An interdisciplinary approach will be 

used to develop the plan in order to 

consider the variety of resource issues 

and concerns identified. Disciplines 

involved in the planning process will 

include specialists with expertise in 

minerals and geology, forestry, range, 

fire and fuels, outdoor recreation, 

archaeology, paleontology, wildlife, 

fisheries, lands and realty, hydrology, 

soils, sociology, environmental justice 

and economics. 

The following planning criteria have 

been proposed to guide development of 

the plan, avoid unnecessary data 

collection and analyses, and to ensure 

the plan is tailored to the issues. Other 

criteria may be identified during the 

public scoping process. After gathering 

comments on planning criteria, the BLM 

will finalize the criteria and provide 

feedback to the public on the criteria to 

be used throughout the planning 

process. Some of the planning criteria 

that are under consideration include: 

• The plans will be completed in 

compliance with the Federal Land 

Policy and Management Act (43 U.S.C. 

1701 et seq.) and the National 

Environmental Policy Act. 

• The plan will recognize valid 

existing rights. 

• Public participation will be 

encouraged throughout the process. The 

BLM will collaborate and build 

relationships with tribes, state and local 

governments, federal agencies, local 

stakeholders and others in the 

community of interest of the plan as 

normal business. 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
9586 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 41 / Friday, March 2, 2007 / Notices 

Dated: November 8, 2006. 

Peter McFadden, 

Acting Kremmling Field Manager. 

Dated: November 9, 2006. 

Jamie Connell, 

Glenwood Springs Field Manager. 

[FR Doc. E7–3627 Filed 3–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 1610–DO–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1105–0030] 

Justice Management Division, Office of 

Attorney Recruitment and 

Management: Agency Information 

Collection Activities: Proposed 

Revision to Previously Approved 

Collection; Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Electronic 

Applications for the Attorney General’s 

Honors Program and the Summer Law 

Intern Program. 

The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Justice Management Division, Office of 

Attorney Recruitment and Management 

(OARM), has submitted the following 

information collection request for 

review and clearance in accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995. Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) approval is sought for the 

information collection listed below. 

This proposed information collection 

was previously published in the Federal 

Register on December 26, 2006, Volume 

71, Number 247, pages 77411–77412, 

allowing for a 60-day public comment 

period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

an additional 30 days for public 

comment until April 2, 2007. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the item(s) contained in this 

notice, especially regarding the 

estimated public burden and associated 

response time, should be directed to the 

Office of Management and Budget, 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Attention: Department of Justice 

Desk Officer, Washington, DC 20530. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to 202–

395–7285. Comments may also be 

submitted to the Department Clearance 

Officer, United States Department of 

Justice, Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

should address one or more of the 

following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of this Information 

Collection: 

(1) Type of Information Collection: 

Revision of a Currently Approved 

Collection 

(2) Title of the Form/Collection: 

Electronic Applications for the Attorney 

General’s Honors Program and the 

Summer Law Intern Program. 

(3) Agency form number, if any, and 

the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Form Number: none. Office of Attorney 

Recruitment and Management, Justice 

Management Division, U.S. Department 

of Justice. 

(4) Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: Primary: Individuals or 

households. Other: None. The 

application form is submitted 

voluntarily once a year by law students 

and judicial law clerks, who will be in 

this applicant pool only once; the 

revision to this collection concerns two 

additional forms required to be 

submitted only by those applicants who 

were selected to be interviewed by 

Department components. These forms 

seek information in order to prepare 

both the official Travel Authorizations 

prior to the interviewees’ performing 

pre-employment interview travel (as 

defined by 41 CFR 301–1.3), and the 

official Travel Vouchers after the travel 

is completed. The first new form is the 

Travel Survey—used by the Department 

in scheduling travel and/or hotel 

accommodations, which in turn 

provides the estimated travel costs 

required by the Travel Authorization 

form. The second new form is a simple 

Reimbursement Form—the interviewees 

are asked to provide their travel costs 

and/or hotel accommodations (if 

applicable) in order for the Department 

to prepare the Travel Vouchers required 

before these interviewees can be 

reimbursed by the Department for the 

authorized costs they incurred during 

this pre-employment interview travel. 

(5) An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond/reply: It is estimated that 5000 

respondents will complete the 

application in approximately one (1) 

hour per application. The revised 

burden would include 600 respondents 

who will complete the travel survey in 

approximately 10 minutes per form, and 

600 respondents who will complete the 

reimbursement form in approximately 

10 minutes per form. 

(6) An estimate of the total public 

burden (in hours) associated with the 

collection: The estimated revised total 

annual public burden associated with 

this application is 5200 hours. 

If additional information is required, 

contact Lynn Bryant, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Patrick Henry Building, 

Suite 1600, 601 D Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: February 26, 2007. 

Lynn Bryant, 

Department Clearance Officer, PRA, 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. E7–3634 Filed 3–1–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–PB–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Investigation 

[OMB Number 1110–0006] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection, 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: 30-day notice of information 

collection under review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection law 

enforcement officers killed or assaulted. 

The Department of Justice, Federal 

Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Justice 

Information Services Division will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and clearance in accordance 

with established review procedures of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. This 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 


pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES