alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AMERICAN EXPRESS CERTIFICATE COMPANY
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

City of Minneapolis

State of Minnesota

The undersigned as a director and officer of American Express Certificate
Company, a face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, hereby constitutes and appoints Brian J. McGrane, David K.
Stewart, Teresa J. Rasmussen, and H. Bernt von Ohlen or any one of them, as her
attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign for her in her name, place and stead any and
all registration statements and amendments thereto (with all exhibits and other
documents required or desirable in connection therewith) that may be prepared
from time to time in connection with said Company's existing or future
face-amount certificate products - whether pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Act of 1933, the Investment Company Act of 1940 or otherwise - and
periodic reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K required pursuant to
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any necessary or
appropriate filings with states or other jurisdictions, and grants to any or all
of them the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
required or necessary or appropriate in connection with such signatures or
filings.

Signed on this 22nd day of February, 2005





/s/ Paula R. Meyer
-------------------
    Paula R. Meyer
PUBLIC LAW 108–59—JULY 14, 2003 117 STAT. 1 

Public Law 108–59 

108th Congress 

An Act 

To extend the Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial Commission, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. ABRAHAM LINCOLN BICENTENNIAL COMMISSION. 

(a) DUTIES.—Section 4 of the Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial 

Commission Act (36 U.S.C. note prec. 101; Public Law 106–173) 

is amended— 

(1) in paragraph (1)(D), by striking ‘‘redesignation’’ and 

inserting ‘‘rededication’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(3) To recommend to Congress a plan to carry out the 

activities recommended under paragraph (2). 

‘‘(4) To carry out other related activities in support of 

the duties carried out under paragraphs (1) through (3).’’. 

(b) EXTENSION.—Section 8 of such Act (36 U.S.C. note prec. 

101; Public Law 106–173) is amended— 

(1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The’’ and inserting ‘‘In 

addition to the interim report required under subsection (b), 

the’’; 

(2) in subsection (b)— 

(A) in the subsection heading, by striking ‘‘FINAL

REPORT.—’’ and inserting ‘‘REQUIRED INTERIM REPORT.—’’; 

(B) by striking the first sentence and inserting: ‘‘Not 

later than June 24, 2004, the Commission shall submit 

an interim report to Congress.’’; and 

(C) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘final’’; and 

(3) by adding at the end the following: 

Reports. 

Deadline. 

July 14, 2003 

[S. 858] 

117 STAT. 2 PUBLIC LAW 108–59—JULY 14, 2003 

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 858: 

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003): 

May 23, considered and passed Senate. 

June 25, considered and passed House. 

Æ 

‘‘(c) FINAL REPORT.—Not later than April 30, 2010, the Commission shall submit a final report to Congress. The final report shall 

contain final statements, recommendations, and information 

described under subsection (b) (1), (2), and (3).’’. 

Approved July 14, 2003. 

Deadline.
**Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmWe consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:   No. 33-8506 on Form S-8 effective September 25, 1986No. 33-25931 on Form S-8 effective November 28, 1988No. 33-32783 on Form S-8 effective January 11, 1990No. 2-72249 on Form S-3 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Form S-16 effectiveJanuary 17, 1990No. 33-32783 on Form S-8 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 effective April 9,1990No. 2-72249 on Form S-3 as amended by Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Form S-16 effectiveApril 7, 1994No. 33-62671 on Form S-8 effective September 15, 1995No. 33-62669 on Form S-8 effective September 15, 1995No. 333-26197 on Form S-8 effective April 30, 1997No. 333-80777 on Form S-8 effective June 16, 1999No. 333-41740 on Form S-8 effective July 19, 2000No. 333-60748 on Form S-8 effective May 11, 2001No. 333-69156 on Form S-8 effective September 7, 2001No. 333-115064 on Form S-8 effective April 30, 2004No. 333-115066 on Form S-8 effective April 30, 2004No. 333-115565 on Form S-8 effective May 17, 2004No. 333-115566 on Form S-8 effective May 17, 2004;of our reports dated February 28, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofIrwin Financial Corporation, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting ofIrwin Financial Corporation, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December31, 2007./s/ Ernst & Young LLPChicago, Illinois
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 23, 2015

No. 04-15-00690-CV

Steven M. GARY,

Appellant

v.

Mary ROMAN, et al.,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-01986

Honorable Laura Salinas, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with the court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT 

OF JURISDICTION.

We order that appellees Mary Roman, et al. recover their costs of appeal, if any, from 

appellant Steven M. Gary. 

It is so ORDERED on December 23, 2015.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of December, 2015.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
No. 49636.

#### Protest 101842-K of Western States Importing Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the hearing it was agreed by counsel that the liquidation was erroneously made. The protest was therefore sustained to this extent.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                           EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY

                      LISTING OF THE COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                         STATE/
                                                        NATURE OF    DATE ACQUIRED         %           COUNTRY OF
NAME                                                     BUSINESS      OR CREATED        OWNED        INCORPORATION
----                                                    ---------    -------------       -----        -------------
<S>                                                    <C>           <C>                 <C>          <C>
Earle M. Jorgensen (Canada) Inc. (formerly Kilsby        Metal           11/13/90         100%           Canada
  Jorgensen Steel & Aluminum Inc.)                     Distributor

Stainless Insurance Ltd.                                Captive          03/20/96         100%           Bermuda
                                                       Insurance
</TABLE>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for
the periods expressed in the Report.
  /s/ Jack A. HockemaJack A. HockemaChief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

JOY M. FOX

v.

STACEY SMITH, DREW J. BAUM,GINAMARIE ELLIS, THERESA AGOSTINELLI, STEVE COCOZZA, ELLEN LUONGO, STEVEN LUONGO, MARYANN D. FURLONG, RICHARD B. KERNS, WILLIAM PASCALE, REPUBLICAN

COMMITTEE OF CHESTER HEIGHTS AND

COMMITTEE FOR THE FUTURE OF CHESTER HEIGHTS,

PETITION OF: THERESA AGOSTINELLI

AND DREW BAUM :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 324 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

JOY M. FOX

v.

STACEY SMITH, DREW J. BAUM, GINAMARIE ELLIS, THERESA AGOSTINELLI, STEVE COCOZZA, ELLEN LUONGO, STEVEN LUONGO, MARYANN D. FURLONG, RICHARD B. KERNS,

WILLIAM PASCALE, REPUBLICAN

COMMITTEE OF CHESTER HEIGHTS AND

COMMITTEE FOR THE FUTURE OF CHESTER HEIGHTS,

PETITION OF: STACEY SMITH :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 325 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

JOY M. FOX :

:

: No. 326 EAL 2019[ 324 EAL 2019, 325 EAL 2019, 326 EAL 2019 and 327 EAL 2019 ]

- 2 v.

STACEY SMITH, DREW J. BAUM, GINAMARIE ELLIS, THERESA AGOSTINELLI, STEVE COCOZZA, ELLEN LUONGO, STEVEN LUONGO, MARYANN D. FURLONG, RICHARD B. KERNS, WILLIAM PASCALE, REPUBLICAN

COMMITTEE OF CHESTER HEIGHTS AND

COMMITTEE FOR THE FUTURE O F CHESTER HEIGHTS,

PETITION OF: WILLIAM PASCALE AND

DREW BAUM :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

JOY M. FOX

v.

STACEY SMITH, DREW J. BAUM,

GINAMARIE ELLIS, THERESA AGOSTINELLI, STEVE COCOZZA, ELLEN LUONGO, STEVEN LUONGO, MARYANN D. FURLONG, RICHARD B. KERNS, WILLIAM PASCALE, REPUBLICAN

COMMITTEE OF CHESTER HEIGHTS AND

COMMITTEE FOR THE FUTURE OF CHESTER HEIGHTS,

PETITION OF: ELLEN LUONGO, STEVEN

LU ONGO, REPUBLICAN COMMITTEE OF CHESTER HEIGHTS, AND COMMITTEE

FOR THE FURTURE OF CHESTER HEIGHTS (COLLECTIVELY, "MOVING

Defendants :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 327 EAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER[ 324 EAL 2019, 325 EAL 2019, 326 EAL 2019 and 327 EAL 2019 ]

- 3

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 24 th day of December, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is GRANTED . The issue, as stated by Petitioner is:

Whether the Superior Court panel, in a matter of first impression, improperly developed a rule for determining proper venue in an internet

- based defamation action that deems venue proper anywhere the purported defamation is accessed through the internet despite the lack of any other connection to the venue, a rule

which abandons all of the protections accorded by the limiting characteristics of the venue rules and opens the door to unchecked forum shopping, calling for this Court to provide “decision and statutory guidance” as requested by the Opinion of the concurring panel member o f the Pennsylvania Superior Court?
Interagency Communications Group 4
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC 

WASHINGTON, U.C _'()460 

Mr. Adam M. Sherman 

O'Keane Automotive Services 

P.O. Box 243 - 2312 Gravois 

High Ridge, M0 63049 

Dear Mr. Sherman: 

= 10 2010 

OF F ICE (?E 

RFSOURCE, CONSERVATION 

AND RI :COVI:ItY 

Thank you for your letter of November 30, 2010; to U.S . Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) Administrator Lisa P. Jackson, regarding the Identification of Non-Hazardous. Secondary 

Materials that are Solid Waste (NHSM) proposed rule. In your letter, you express concerns that the rule 

may impact the current used oil management system and could have unintended consequences. I 

appreciate your interest in these important issues .' _ 

EPA does not want to reduce legitimate recycling of used oil : It is one of many non-hazardous 

secondary materials discussed in the proposed rule. The preamble specifically discusses the standards for 

management of used oil used under 40 CFR Part 279. Used oil that meets the criteria is considered "onspecification ;" that which does not meet the criteria, "off-specification :" Under the proposed rule, onspec used oil is considered a "traditional fuel," (i.e ., is considered historically managed as a valuable fuel 

product rather than as a waste material) . Traditional fuels are not considered solid wastes under the 

proposed rule. Thus, on-spec used oil would not be considered a solid waste when burned as a fuel under 

the proposed rule. 

Off-spec used oil is considered a solid waste under the proposed rule and combustion units 

burning it would be subject to the appropriate standards under section 129 of the Clean Air Act for solid 

waste incinerators. This proposed approach would provide an additional measure of control to address 

the higher level of contaminants that could be present in off-Spec used oil . Under the proposed rule, offspec used oil that is processed into on-spec used oil would not be considered a solid waste: 

The Agency will promulgate a final rule based on all available comments, information, and data. 

Your letter will be entered into the rulemaking docket (EPA-HQ-RCRA-2008-0329) : for consideration as 

the final rule is developed. 

Again; thank you for your letter . If you have further questions, please contact George Faison of 

my staff at (703) 305-7652 or via email at 1'aisoli .george ~je aa. 

Si:ncerely, 

Suzanne Rudzinski, Acting Director 

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

Sustainable Use of Resources - Life Cycle Approach to Managing Chemical Risks " Sate ; Environmentally Sound Waste 'vlanagement 

Internet Address (URL) - http .//w,~N-w .epa.g,ov _
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00237

- CV

James L. Mundie Jr.

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§ From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F

- 2001

- 0224

- C)

December 22, 2016

Opinion by Justice Meier



### JUDGMENT

This court has con sidered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s order . It is ordered that the order of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier

Justice Bill Meier
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4235 

AN ACT 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to reauthorize grants to support for law 

enforcement officers and families, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4235 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reauthorizing Support 

3 and Treatment for Officers in Crisis Act of 2024’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

5 Section 1001(a)(21) of title I of the Omnibus Crime 

6 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 

7 10261(a)(21)) is amended by striking ‘‘2020 through 

8 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘2025 through 2029’’. 

Passed the Senate August 1, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4235 

AN ACT 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

and for other purposes. port for law enforcement officers and families, Streets Act of 1968 to reauthorize grants to sup-
May 29, 1957

No. 60814.

Suit 4875.

#### United States *v.*Cody Manufacturing Co., Inc., and Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc.

C. A. D. 639.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAVIER RAIGOZA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1208 GEB KJM

vs.

ARAMARK CORPORATION, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

The undersigned conducted a telephonic conference with counsel on August 18,

2005. Plaintiff now has filed a letter brief addressing issues identified by his counsel at the

August 18, 2005 conference, but not previously raised or resolved by noticed motion. Good

cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants may file a letter brief, limited to two pages, addressing the issues

raised by plaintiff’s letter brief.

2. The matter will thereafter stand submitted. The hearing date of August 24,

2005 is vacated. 

DATED: August 23, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006 raigoza.sub

Case 2:04-cv-01208-GEB -KJM Document 57 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Essex
Portfolio, L.P. report for the nine months ended September 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          24,577
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   77,251
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               107,401
<PP&E>                                       1,175,608
<DEPRECIATION>                               (111,041)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,229,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,068
<BONDS>                                        545,113
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                2
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     629,632
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,229,175
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               129,306
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,611
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,468
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,620
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 50,760
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,760
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    50,760
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.79


</TABLE>
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 404 

To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected State 

and local governments before making an expenditure from the Nuclear 

Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO (for herself and Ms. ROSEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent 

of affected State and local governments before making 

an expenditure from the Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nuclear Waste In5 formed Consent Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act, the terms ‘‘affected Indian tribe’’, ‘‘af8 fected unit of local government’’, ‘‘high-level radioactive 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 404 IS

1 waste’’, ‘‘repository’’, ‘‘Secretary’’, ‘‘spent nuclear fuel’’, 

2 and ‘‘unit of general local government’’ have the meanings 

3 given the terms in section 2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy 

4 Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101). 

5 SEC. 3. CONSENT-BASED APPROVAL. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary may not make an 

7 expenditure from the Nuclear Waste Fund established 

8 under section 302(c) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 

9 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(c)) for the costs of the activities 

10 described in paragraphs (4) and (5) of section 302(d) of 

11 that Act (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) unless the Secretary has 

12 entered into an agreement for a repository with— 

13 (1) the Governor of the State in which the re14 pository is proposed to be located; 

15 (2) each affected unit of local government; 

16 (3) any unit of general local government contig17 uous to the affected unit of local government if 

18 spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste will 

19 be transported through that unit of general local 

20 government for disposal at the repository; and 

21 (4) each affected Indian tribe. 

22 (b) CONDITIONS ON AGREEMENT.—Any agreement 

23 for a repository under this Act— 

24 (1) shall be in writing and signed by all parties; 

25 (2) shall be binding on the parties; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 404 IS

1 (3) shall not be amended or revoked except by 

2 mutual agreement of the parties. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
No. P68/285.

protests 66/70341, etc. (Los Angeles).

No. P68/286.

protests 66/73588, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### The Newman Co. *v.*United States, Mitsubishi Int. Corp. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue herein is the specific issue in *United States*v. *Weather-Rite Sportswear Co., Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 2, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-2421 Lower Tribunal Nos. F02-9709 & F02-16327

________________ 

### Kevin Jordan , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lody Jean, Judge. Kevin Jordan, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LINDSEY, and HENDON, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 18 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with GM on June 7, 2011 FROM: Don Kopinski TO: Docket EPA- HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held by phone on June 7 , 2011 b etween GM and EPA staff. The following people attended : GM : Barbara Kiss, Steve Fornetti EPA: Angela Cullen, Tony Fernandez, Don Kopinski The discussion focused on loose engines in the HD GHG program .
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLENN CARROLL HOLSOME,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0924 LKK GGH P

vs.

DAVE RUNNELS,

Respondent. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On August 23, 2005, respondent filed a motion to

dismiss. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 78-230(m) provides in

part: “Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no

opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . .” Good

cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within twenty days,

why respondent’s August 23, 2005, motion to dismiss should not be granted. 

DATED: 11/21/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035 - hols0924.46

Case 2:04-cv-00924-LKK-CHS Document 24 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 1