alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 1 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 2 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 3 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 4 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 5 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 6 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 7 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 8 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 9 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 10 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 11 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 12 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 13 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 14 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 15 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 16 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 17 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 18 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 19 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 20 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 21 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 22 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 23 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 24 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 25 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 26 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 27 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 28 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 29 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 30 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 31 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 32 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 33 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 34 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 35 of 36
Case 2:04-cv-00265-TON Document 1 Filed 01/21/04 Page 36 of 36
Case No. 9,764.

#### MOORE et al. v. HARLEY.

[4 N. B. R. 242 (Quarto. 71); 1 2 Balt Law Trans. 666.]

District Court, D. Maryland.

1870.

Bankruptcy — Petition not Subscribed — Incurable Defect.

When in an involuntary case the petitioners failed to subscribe the affidavit to the petition, *held,*the petition was defective, inasmuch as the forms prescribed by the supreme court required the affidavit and petition to be subscribed by petitioners. Defect incurable, since petition was not a petition in propria forma, such as could be amended.

[Cited in Hunt v. Pooke, Case No. 6,896.]

R. McLaughlin, for plaintiffs.

Albert Ritchie, for defendant

1

 [Reprinted from 4 N. B. R. 242 (Quarto, 71), by permission.)

This was a case of involuntary bankruptcy [in the matter of Moore & Bro. against Harley.] The petition was regularly subscribed and sworn to, and the register who took the affidavit of the petitioners had signed his name in due form. But the petitioners had not subscribed the affidavit to the petition. Thereupon the respondent demurred to the petition, alleging that the petitioners had not by their petition made such a case as entitled them to have the respondent declared a bankrupt, within the provisions of the act of congress entitled, “An act to establish a uniform system of bankruptcy throughout the United States,” approved March 2, 1867 [14 Stat. 517]. Upon the hearing the demurrer was sustained, and the petition dismissed with costs. It was held that the petition was defective, inasmuch as the forms prescribed by the supreme court require that the affidavit as well as the petition should be subscribed by the petitioners, and that the defect was incurable, since the petition was not a petition in propria forma, such as could be amended.
No. 63082.

#### H. P. Lambert Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 322686-K/14995 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 5/22/2023 1

George Mason University Student 

Voter-Registration Addresses 

New Virginia Majority Education Fund 

v. Fairfax County Board of Elections 

(Rossie D. Alston, Jr., E.D. Va. 1:19-cv-1379) 

A district judge ordered relief for university students whose voterregistration applications were rejected because they did not include 

dormitory and room numbers. 

Subject: Nullifying registrations. Topics: Student registration; 

registration procedures; provisional ballots; case assignment. 

A Wednesday, October 30, 2019, federal complaint filed in the Eastern District of Virginia sought remedies for a county’s denying voter registration to 

George Mason University students who did not specify their dormitory and 

room numbers on their applications, alleging that this was contrary to prior 

practice, and alleging that the county’s offered remedies were inadequate.1

On the next day, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction 

completing approximately 170 voter registrations in time for the November 

5 election.2

The court initially assigned the case to Judge T.S. Ellis III, then to Judge 

Leonie M. Brinkema, and then to Judge Rossie D. Alston, Jr., who heard the 

case from 10:26 to 11:00 a.m. on November 1 and promised a decision by 

12:30.3

Judge Alston granted relief.4

 His order specified conditions for curing 

some incomplete registration applications for George Mason students in 

time for the election.5

On July 20, 2020, Judge Alston approved a voluntary dismissal of the 

case.6

1. Complaint, New Va. Majority Educ. Fund v. Fairfax Cty. Bd. of Elections, No. 1:19-cv1379 (E.D. Va. Oct. 30, 2019), D.E. 1; see Amy Gardner, Voting at GMU Made Difficult, 

Wash. Post, Oct. 25, 2019, at B4. 

2. Preliminary-Injunction Motion, New Va. Majority Educ. Fund, No. 1:19-cv-1379 (E.D. 

Va. Oct. 31, 2019), D.E. 9. 

3. Minutes, id. (Nov. 1, 2019), D.E. 16; Docket Sheet, id. (Oct. 30, 2019). 

4. Order, id. (Nov. 1, 2019), D.E. 17. 

5. Id.; see Antonio Olivo, Judge Orders Fairfax to Let GMU Students Vote, Wash. Post, 

Nov. 2, 2019, at B4. 

6. Order, New Va. Majority Educ. Fund, No. 1:19-cv-1379 (E.D. Va. July 20, 2020), D.E. 

19.
Before the Third Division,

May 1, 1947

No. 51681.

#### Protests 997142-G, etc., of Mon Hing & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp.(the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's position prevailing in regard to
the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more fully described in the Report);
and

     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 4, 2006


BY: /s/ Thomas J. Stirnweis
    ------------------------------------
    (Signature)
    THOMAS J. STIRNWEIS
    Vice President, Treasurer and
    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Carter J Ward, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.




Date:
August 15, 2011

/s/ Carter J. WardCarter J. WardChief Financial Officer ofElite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer




This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
        Here's how you know
            Navegar a la página de inicio en españolDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
          
          A
          **.gov**
          website belongs to an official government organization in the United
          States.
    Https**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
          
          A
          **lock**
          (
          A locked padlock
          ) or
          **https://**
          means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
          information only on official, secure websites. FEMA | National Flood Insurance ProgramClick to go to home pageFind a ProviderRiver Flooding: Coming soon to your homeIn a world where spring rains, melting snow and other changing weather patterns have caused more and more flooding, life by the river can be full of surprises. When you least expect it, the river can turn toward your home. Homeowners and renters policies do not cover flooding, so don't just wait at the edge of your seats. Be prepared for river flooding. Get flood insurance and protect yourself from the river's unexpected twists and turns.Find an insurance providerRiverine flooding is the 3rd costliest natural disaster.Your SpotlightThe StoryWhat's the historical flood risk in my area?View Flood MapsThe HeroWhat type of coverage is best for me?See types of Flood InsuranceThe ActionHow do I protect the life I've built?Get Flood InsuranceWhen the river takes a dramatic turn, flood insurance can help you rebuild.Find an Insurance ProviderA Story of ResilienceBobette Patton, a Local Missouri homeowner, and National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) policyholder, shares how she recovered from five floods in eight years (2008-2016) due to river overflow in Missouri. Learn how flood insurance plays a vital role in flood preparation.Find an insurance provider





FEMA | National Flood Insurance Program
                        500 C St SW,
            Washington,
            D.C.
            20472 Disaster Assistance:
          (800) 621-FEMA An official website of the Department of Homeland Security
 **Need Help?** About Us Contact Us Glossary Privacy Policy Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
 **Related Links** Footer Accordion Links
  

        


    
    
            Partner Sites
          No Fear Data Act

      
    
      
        Freedom of Information Act

      
    
      
        Office of the Inspector General

      
    
      
        Whitehouse.gov

      
    
      
        DHS.gov

      
    
      
        USA.gov
 FEMA.gov Ready.gov DisasterAssistance.gov Accessibility Plug-Ins
 **Connect with NFIP**
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FOUR RIVERS BROADCASTING, INC.,

Plaintiff, CIV-S-04-0580 FCD KJM 

vs.

VBNJ, INC. dba MT. SHASTA

BREWING CO.,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

The parties and their counsel met in settlement conference on May 11, 2005. 

Appearances were placed on the record. Settlement was reached, and the specific terms of

settlement were placed on the record and affirmed by all. The settlement contemplates a

possible, further recitation of details of the settlement, but such details cannot contradict the

terms of settlement as placed on the record (unless, of course, all agree to such changes). Subject

to the express conditions set forth in the record, and as between the parties in this action, the

settlement essentially permits defendants to use the tradename “Mount Shasta Brewing

Company” in the conduct of their business, and plaintiff may use the trademark “Mount Shasta”

in its beer/ale products. 

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-00580-FCD-KJM Document 33 Filed 05/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The case has therefore settled. As set forth in greater detail in the record, the

court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of this settlement for five years. Final

dispositional documents shall be filed no later than May 26, 2005. All other previously

scheduled dates in this case are vacated.

DATED: 5/17/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

____________________________________

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:gh:035

fourrivers.sett

Case 2:04-cv-00580-FCD-KJM Document 33 Filed 05/17/05 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WENDELL ANDERSON, Lance Corporal, U. S. Marine Corps, Appellant

18 USCMA 18, 39 CMR 18

No. 21,044

November 15, 1968

*Frank J. McGee, Jr., Esquire, Captain Peter B. Work,*USMC, and *Lieutenant Clinton F. Raymond,*JAGC, USNR, were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Captain John J. Kelly, Jr.,*USMCR, was on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

The decision of the board of review as to specification 3 of Charge II is reversed. United States v Tassos, 18 USCMA 12, 39 CMR 12, this day decided. The findings of guilty as to specification 3 of Charge II are set aside and the Charge is ordered dismissed. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy for submission to the board of review for reconsideration of the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<CASH>                                          25,299
<SECURITIES>                                   142,388
<RECEIVABLES>                                  520,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,785
<INVENTORY>                                    299,556
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,031,460
<PP&E>                                       1,480,938
<DEPRECIATION>                                 680,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,091,920
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          536,226
<BONDS>                                        260,127
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,184,578
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,091,920
<SALES>                                      9,520,930
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,520,930
<CGS>                                        9,132,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,132,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,211
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                291,182
<INCOME-TAX>                                   110,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            180,482
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   180,482
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.88
        

</TABLE>
Conversation with T. Busby, August 2009.

Wildwood Consulting

To reduce nutrient runoff and satisfy its waste load allocation (WLA) under the Lower St. Johns 

River total maximum daily load (TMDL), Anheuser Bush used hyacinth management, a baffle 

system, and aeration in certain zones of its Lem Turner location. At its Main Street location, it 

reduced it’s nutrient load by altering its nutrient management plan, and increasing the acreage of 

its land application of wastewater. Georgia Pacific similarly reduced the quantity of nutrients 

added to its treatment ponds.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of American Bank NoteHolographics, Inc. (the “Company”), that the Quarterly Report of the Company onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 andthat the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periodcovered by the Report and the results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by the Report.

 

 
|                          | By: /s/ Kenneth H. Traub              |   |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                          | Kenneth H. Traub                      |
|                          | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                          |                                  |
| Date:  November 13, 2003 |                                  |

 

----
Jonathan B. Hill

202/776-2725

jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

June 3, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: FAA-Docket 2015-0513 Supplement to Application/Amendment filed ________

Dear Sir or Madam:

Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”) hereby files the attached confidential 

manual submitted to support its May 13, 2015 amendment to its Section 333 exemption request. 

1. “Liberty 3”

This manual was not filed with the original submission of the Supplemental 

Application/Amendment. With this submission the FAA has manuals for each of the additional 

aircraft that Liberty Mutual proposes to operate under the exemption when granted.

Liberty Mutual requests that this manual be maintained in confidence and not placed in the 

public docket or otherwise disclosed to the public. As the information included in the manual

includes trade secrets and commercial information that is confidential and not made available to 

the public, it is exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b) 

and 14 C.F.R. Part 11. Should the FAA receive a request for access to these manuals, we 

would request notification of such request prior to any action being taken by the FAA, as it may 

relate to the request.

Should you or your staff have any questions, please contact the undersigned.

Sincerely,

Jonathan B. Hill

M. Anne Swanson

Cooley LLP

Counsel for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Enclosures
James H. Williams

June 3, 2015

Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

cc: William Cozier

Robert Pappas

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith

Thuy H. Cooper
Exhibit 1

(Confidential)
EXHIBIT 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Circle Group Holdings, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Dana L.
Dabney, Chief Financial Officer of the Circle Group Holdings, Inc. certify,
pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  August 12, 2005                     /s/ Dana L. Dabney
                                            ------------------
                                            Dana L. Dabney
                                            Chief Financial Officer
                                           (Principal Financial Officer)
Clean Air Act Advisory Committee 

Draft Meeting Agenda 

May 26 -27, 2010 

Subcommittee meetings 

May 26 Hamilton Crowne Plaza Hotel (14th & K Streets, NW D.C.)

8:30 – 12:00 Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovation 

1:00 – 3:30 Permits/NSR/Toxics/Bact work group joint meeting 

Clean Air Excellence Awards Program 

May 26 Almas Temple (1315 K Street next to Hamilton Crowne Plaza) 

4:15 – 4:30 Movie – Air Science 40 - Celebrating Four Decades of Innovative Research

4:30 – 6:30 Clean Air Excellence Awards Ceremony 

6:30 – 7:45 Awards Reception 

Clean Air Act Advisory Committee 

Full Committee meeting 

May 27 Almas Temple (1315 K Street next to Hamilton Crowne Plaza) 

8:00- 8:30 Registration

8:30 – 9:15 Welcome/Opening Comments

 U.S. EPA Office of Air And Radiation 

 Assistant Administrator Gina McCarthy 

9:15 -9:45 Subcommittee Report Outs

 Mobile Sources Technical Review Subcommittee Report Out 

 Economic Incentives and Regulatory Innovation 

 

 Meet 2 of the Clean Air Excellence Award Winners 

9:45 – 10:05 Bridging the Gap – Kristin Riott 

10:05 – 10:30 ZGreen Certification Program – Mayor Mick Ireland 

10:30– 10:45 Break 

10:45 – 12:15 BACT Workgroup Update – EPA initial response to Phase 1 BACT 

 Report and status update on phase 2 of workgroup -Workgroup Chairs 

12:15 – 1:30 Lunch 

1:30 – 2:30 Voluntary and Community Programs 

 Jay Benforado – Environmental Protection Agency 

2:30– 3:30 Case Study for Incorporating Reductions from Renewable Portfolio 

 Standards and Energy Efficiency Measures in SIPs

 Chris Stoneman – Environmental Protection Agency 

 

3:30 – 3:45 Public Comments 

3:45 – 4:15 Next meeting/Close