alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
The X-Change Corporation
File No.  000-53132
Form 10-K
For the year ended December 31, 2008

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of The X-Change Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31, 2008 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, R. Wayne Duke,
Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: December 21, 2009                    By: /s/ R. Wayne Duke
      -----------------                        ---------------------------------
                                                                   R. Wayne Duke
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to The  X-Change  Corporation  and will be  retained  by The  X-Change
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# Welcome to OTCnet Web-Based Training!

Click your OTCnet role to access Training resources for your learning needs. Once you have clicked on your role, you can view Web Based Training (WBT) modules, Printable Job Aids (PJAs) and Videos that support your OTCnet user training.

**OTCnet Participant User Guides: Glossary**

OTCnet Participant User Guides: Glossary

**OTCnet Participant User Guides**

OTCnet Participant User Guides

**Training Module Topics**

Training Module Topics

# Agency

## Security Administration

Accounting Specialist/Local Accounting Specialist(Acc Spec/Local)

Check Capture Administrator (CCA)

Primary/Local Security Administrator (P/LSA)

Card Administrator (CA)

## Check Capture and Check Processing

Agency Manager

Check Capture Lead Operator (CCLO)

Check Capture Operator (CCO)

Check Capture Supervisor (CCS)

Master Verification Database Editor (MVD Editor)

Master Verification Database Viewer (MVD Viewer)

## Deposit Processing

Deposit Preparer (DP)

Deposit Approver (DA)

Deposit Preparer/Deposit Approver (DP/A)

Agency Viewer (V)

## Card Processing

Card Operator (CO)

# Financial Institution (FI)

## Security Administration

Accounting Specialist/Local Accounting Specialist(Acc Spec/Local)

Primary/Local Security Administrator (P/LSA)

## Deposit Processing

FI Deposit Confirmer (DC)

FI Viewer (V)

# Federal Reserve Bank (FRB)

## Security Administration

Accounting Specialist/Local Accounting Specialist(Acc Spec/Local)

Primary/Local Security Administrator (P/LSA)

## Deposit Processing

FRB Deposit Confirmer (DC)

FRB Viewer (V)
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended June 25, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haig J. Nargesian,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ HAIG J. NARGESIAN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Haig J. Nargesian *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: August 4, 2004
_____________________

* Haig J. Nargesian functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
FLETC.gov

A FLETC All Website Data - GA4nalytics 

© 2023 Google | Analytics home | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |

WHERE DO YOUR NEW USERS COME FROM? WHAT ARE YOUR TOP CAMPAIGNS?

HOW ARE ACTIVE USERS TRENDING? HOW WELL DO YOU RETAIN YOUR USERS?

WHICH PAGES AND SCREENS GET THE MOST VIEWS? WHAT ARE YOUR TOP EVENTS?

 

02

Jul

09 16 23 30

0

1K

2K

3K

4K

5K

New users by First user default channel group  

Organic Search

Direct

Referral

Organic Social

Unassigned

Email

Organic Video

0 20K 40K 60K



Sessions by   Session default channel group

SESSION DEFAULT CHAN... SESSIONS

Organic Search 72K

Direct 20K

Referral 9.9K

Unassigned 1.5K

Organic Social 1.3K

Email 17

Organic Video 9



Users by Country  

COUNTRY USERS

United States 73K

Canada 456

United Kingdom 396

Germany 356

India 327

Philippines 242

Puerto Rico 218



User activity over time  

02

Jul

09 16 23 30

0

20K

40K

60K

80K

100K 30 DAYS

77K

7 DAYS

18K

1 DAY

2.1K

User activity by cohort

Based on device data only

 

Week 0 Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5

All Users

Jun 18 - Jun 24

Jun 25 - Jul 1

Jul 2 - Jul 8

Jul 9 - Jul 15

Jul 16 - Jul 22

Jul 23 - Jul 29

100.0% 2.5% 1.2% 1.0% 0.8% 0.6%

6 weeks ending Jul 29 

Views by Page title and screen class  

PAGE TITLE AND SCREEN CLASS VIEWS

Training Catalog | Fed...ement Training Centers 33K

Frontpage | Federal La...ment Training Centers 27K

Glynco, Georgia | Fede...ment Training Centers 15K

PEB Scores for Age and...ment Training Centers 4.8K

Glynco Campus Life | ...ment Training Centers 4.6K

Locations | Federal La...ment Training Centers 4.5K

FedBizOpps | Federal ...ment Training Centers 4.3K



Event count by Event name  

EVENT NAME EVENT COUNT

page_view 248K

user_engagement 193K

session_start 102K

first_visit 7

Click 28K

PDF 13K

DOCX 42



Users by Device category  

MOBILE

54.9%

DESKTOP

44.1%

TABLET

1.1%



New users by First user source  

FIRST USER SOURCE NEW USERS

google 47K

(direct) 15K

bing 3.8K

dhs.gov 2.2K

usajobs.gov 977

fletc-prod.modolabs.net 9

duckduckgo 703





Go to report

Users

78K

New users

76K

Average engagementtime 

1m 18s

Total revenue 

$0.00

View user acquisition View traffic acquisition

View countries View retention

View pages and screens View events View device categories View user acquisition

Send feedback

Add comparison 

Reports snapshot

A All Users



Custom Jul 1 - Jul 31, 2023 ▼
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A1 39 1 . STEPHEN LEKEY J ACKSON v

. THE STATE.

In 20 1 5

, St ep hen Lek ey J ack s o n p l ed g u i l t y to o ne co u n t o f ag grav at ed as s au l t

an d fo ur co u n t s o f reck l es s co n d u ct

. J ack s on was s en t en ced t o a t o t al t erm o f s ev en

y ears t o b e serv ed o n pro bat i o n

. On Feb ru ary 1 3

, 2 0 1 7

, J ack so n fi l ed an “ Ap p l i cat i o n

t o t h e G eo rg ia Co u rt o f A pp eal s ” i n t h e t ri al co urt

, seek i n g t o ap p eal t h e rev o cat i o n

o f h i s p ro b at i o n

. 1 W e, h o wev er, l ack ju ri s d ict i o n

. To ap p eal an o rd er rev o k i n g p ro b at i o n, a p art y m u s t fi rs t fi l e an ap pl i cat i o n fo r
d i s cret i o n ary ap peal in t h i s Co urt wi th i n 3 0 d ay s o f t h e en t ry o f t h e o rd er fro m wh i ch

t h e ap p eal i s s ou g h t

. OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (5 ), (d ); s ee To d d v. S t a t e , 2 3 6 Ga. Ap p.

7 5 7

, 7 5 8 ( 5 1 3 S E2 d 28 7 ) (1 99 9 ) (h o ld i n g th at wh ere t h e u n derl y i ng s u b ject m at t er

i s p ro b at i o n rev o cat i o n , t h e d i s cret i on ary ap p eal p ro ced u re ap pl i es ); acco rd W h i t e v.

S t a t e , 2 3 3 Ga. Ap p

. 8 7 3

, 8 7 4 (5 0 5 SE2 d 2 2 8 ) (1 9 98 ). Jack s o n ’ s ap p l i cat i o n , fi l ed in

t h e t ri al co u rt

, is i n effect i v e. See g en eral ly Ga b le v. S t at e , 2 9 0 Ga. 8 1

, 8 5 (2 ) (a) (7 2 0

1 O rd ers rev o k i n g J ack s o n ’ s p ro bat i o n were en t e r e d o n M arch 3, 20 1 7 an d
M arch 2 9 , 2 0 1 7

. April 16, 2018SE2 d 1 7 0) (2 0 1 1 ) (a di s cret io n a r y a p p l i cat i on m u s t o n l y be fi led i n an ap p el l at e

co u rt ).

Acco rd i ng l y , we l ack ju ri s di ct i o n an d t h e ap p eal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/16/2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PAUL A. WESBECHER, No. CIV S-04-0807-FCD-CMK

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

DANIEL FOY,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, who is no longer in custody, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis

in this petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before

the court is petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability (Doc. 44), filed on July 11, 2006. 

Before petitioner can appeal this decision, a certificate of appealability must issue. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). A certificate of appealability may issue under 28

U.S.C. § 2253 “only if the applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). The court must either issue a certificate of

appealability indicating which issues satisfy the required showing or must state the reasons why

such a certificate should not issue. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-00807-FCD-CMK Document 46 Filed 08/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement. See Scott v.

Younger, 739 F.2d 1464, 1466 (9th Cir. 1984). The time limit for filing a notice of appeal

following entry of judgment is thirty days. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). Petitioner's notice of appeal

in this action was filed more than thirty days after entry of judgment. It is, therefore, untimely

and cannot provide the court of appeals with jurisdiction. The issuance of a certificate of

appealability cannot vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction if jurisdiction is not proper in that

court. Cf. Hayward v. Britt, 572 F.2d 1324, 1325 (9th Cir. 1978) (addressing issuance of a

certificate of probable cause). Because petitioner’s notice of appeal is untimely, the court

declines to issue a certificate of appealability.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s request for a certificate

of appealability is denied.

DATED:August 21, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00807-FCD-CMK Document 46 Filed 08/21/06 Page 2 of 2
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Juan Ramon MATTA-LOPEZ, aka El Negro, aka Juan Ramon Matta-Bal-lesteros, aka Blacky, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 99-50707, 00-50031.

D.C. No. CR-85-00606-PAR.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 25, 2001.

*567Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

MEMORANDUM **

In No. 99-50707, federal prisoner Juan Ramon Matta-Lopez appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motion for a new trial after his conviction for conducting a continuing criminal enterprise. In No. 00-50031, Matta-Lopez appeals pro se the district court’s denial of his motion to extend time within which to file his notice of appeal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, consolidate the appeals, and affirm in part and dismiss in part.

Matta-Lopez contends the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to extend the time within which to file his notice of appeal. We review a district court’s determination concerning excusable neglect for failing to file a timely notice of appeal for an abuse of discretion. *See United States v. Prairie Pharmacy, Inc.,*921 F.2d 211, 212 (9th Cir.1990). “Because of the special importance of providing criminal defendants an opportunity to appeal, ... we will review more searchingly a district court’s finding of no excusable neglect in a criminal appeal.” *Id.*at 213.

Relying upon *United States v. Smith,*60 F.3d 595, 596 (9th Cir.1995), Matta-Lopez argues his attorney’s inability to communicate with him to determine whether to file a notice of appeal constitutes excusable neglect. Matta-Lopez’s reliance upon *Smith*is misplaced. Unlike *Smith,*the district court here found insufficient facts to constitute excusable neglect. *Cf. id.*The two declarations submitted to the district court by Matta-Lopez’s counsel described in conclusory terms the difficulty in communicating with Matta-Lopez. The declarant failed to describe with factual specificity any actual acts taken by counsel in attempting to contact Matta-Lopez. We conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in finding no excusable neglect. *See Prairie Pharmacy,*921 F.2d at 212-13.

Because we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion, we lack jurisdiction to consider the merits of Matta-Lopez’s untimely appeal.1*See United States v. Eccles,*850 F.2d 1357, 1363 (9th Cir.1988).

AFFIRMED in part; and DISMISSED in part.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

1

. Matta-Lopez has moved in this court for leave to amend his appeal to include the claim that his counsel's failure to timely file his Rule 33 motion constitutes ineffective assistance. We deny his motion. *See United States v. Houtchens,*926 F.2d 824, 828 (9th Cir.1991).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLENN CAROLE HOLSOME,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0924 LKK GGH P

vs.

DAVE RUNNELS, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is proceeding with an application pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, with

appointed counsel. On April 7, 2005, petitioner filed an exhausted-claims-only amended petition

upon which he apparently elects to proceed. Respondent has failed to file a response timely

pursuant to the court’s order, filed on September 27, 2004. Respondent must show cause for his

failure to file a response to the amended petition within twenty days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 6/1/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009

hols0924.osc

Case 2:04-cv-00924-LKK-CHS Document 16 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 1
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 7/6/2023 1

No Relief from a Constitutional-Amendment 

Waiting-Time Requirement During a Pandemic 

Fight Back Fund v. Illinois State Board of Elections 

(Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, N.D. Ill. 1:20-cv-2791) 

During a global infectious pandemic, supporters of a state constitutional amendment sought relief from a requirement that proposed 

amendments be passed by the legislature at least six months before 

an election, in light of interruptions to the legislature’s work because of the pandemic. The district judge denied immediate relief, 

because the legislature had not yet passed the plaintiffs’ proposal. 

Subject: Ballot measures. Topics: Ballot measure; getting on the 

ballot; Covid-19; case assignment. 

A May 8, 2020, federal complaint filed in the Northern District of Illinois 

sought relief from a requirement by Illinois’s constitution “that proposed 

amendments . . . be passed by the legislature at least six months prior to the 

next general election” in light of canceled general-assembly sessions because 

of the global Covid-19 infectious pandemic.1 A week later, the plaintiffs filed 

a motion for a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction.2

Acting as an emergency judge, Judge Rebecca R. Pallmeyer set the case 

for a telephonic hearing on May 19.3

 To accommodate disruptions to court 

operations resulting from the pandemic, a few district judges rotated duty 

days for emergency matters.4

At the hearing, Judge Pallmeyer declared the motion premature because 

the legislature had not approved the constitutional amendment proposed by 

the plaintiffs.5 “THE COURT: Go down there to Springfield and get this 

thing through. If you get it through, you come back to me and tell me I 

should enter a [temporary restraining order] that lifts the six-month restriction.”6

The plaintiffs dismissed their case voluntarily on June 30.7

1. Complaint, Fight Back Fund v. Ill. State Bd. of Elections, No. 1:20-cv-2791 (N.D. Ill. 

May 8, 2020), D.E. 1. 

2. Motion, id. (May 15, 2020), D.E. 8. 

3. Minutes, id. (May 15, 2020), D.E. 10. 

Tim Reagan interviewed Judge Pallmeyer for this report by telephone on October 7, 

2020. 

4. Interview with Hon. Rebecca R. Pallmeyer, Oct. 7, 2020. 

5. Minutes, Fight Back Fund, No. 1:20-cv-2791 (N.D. Ill. May 19, 2020), D.E. 14. 

6. Transcript at 12, id. (May 19, 2020, filed May 19, 2020), D.E. 15. 

7. Voluntary Dismissal, id. (June 30, 2020), D.E. 26; see Minutes, id. (July 27, 2020), D.E. 

28 (closing case).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

H.S. SADOW, JR. CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4476

 VS. 

McNEIL-PPC, INC.

 

MARNA BERKMAN

 VS. NO. 02-4362

McNEIL-PPC, INC.

 

RICHARD KIRSCH, ET AL

 VS. NO. 02-4387

McNEIL-PPC, INC.

 

ANDREW SPARK

NO. 02-4386

 VS.

McNEIL-PPC, INC.

Case 2:02-cv-04387-MK Document 2 Filed 07/12/2002 Page 1 of 2
 ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th of JULY, 2002, it is hereby, 

 ORDERED that the above captioned cases are reassigned from

the calendar of the Honorable Berle M. Schiller to the Honorable Marvin Katz, as

related to Civil Action Nos. 02-4093, 02-4149, 02-4105, 02-4180 and 02-4197.

FOR THE COURT:

 

JAMES T. GILES

Chief Judge

ATTEST:

 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ

Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04387-MK Document 2 Filed 07/12/2002 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
      32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the “Company”)
      hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




(i)  the
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended
      June
      30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended (subject to the Company's position prevailing in regard to the
      remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more fully described in the Report);
      and




(ii)  the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
      August 9, 2007




BY:/s/
      Leo Liebowitz


(Signature)


LEO
      LIEBOWITZ


Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished
      to
      the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.
-77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6 -76.4 -76.2 -76.0

39.2 39.4 39.6 39.8



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/22 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 22 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Page 1 of 2

Diane Duncan v. State of California, et al. USDC, Eastern District, Case No. CIV.S-04-523 LKK/DAD

VOLUNTARY STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CITY OF SACRAMENTO & CHIEF OF POLICE ALBERT NAJERA

LAW OFFICE OF MARK E. MERIN

Mark E. Merin, SBN 043849

Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild, SBN 192086

2001 P Street, Suite 100

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 443-6911

Facsimile: (916) 447-8336

E-Mail: office@markmerin.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff

---o0o---

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

---o0o---

DIANE DUNCAN, 

Plaintiff,

v.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY; SACRAMENTO

COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT,

SHERIFF LOU BLANAS, and DOES I through

XXX, inclusive,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CIV.S-04-523 LKK/DAD

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL BY

STIPULATION OF DEFENDANTS CITY OF

SACRAMENTO AND CHIEF OF POLICE

ALBERT NAJERA [FRCP Rule 41(a)]; and

ORDER

COMPLAINT FILED: March 16, 2004

TRIAL DATE: June 26, 2005

It is hereby stipulated by and between the parties hereto that the following parties only may be

dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs:

C CITY OF SACRAMENTO

C CHIEF OF POLICE ALBERT NAJERA

Dated: January 3, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

LAW OFFICES OF MARK E. MERIN

/s/ - “Jeffrey I. Schwarzschild”

By: 

JEFFREY I. SCHWARZSCHILD, Esq.

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-00523-LKK -EFB Document 54 Filed 01/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Page 2 of 2

Diane Duncan v. State of California, et al. USDC, Eastern District, Case No. CIV.S-04-523 LKK/DAD

VOLUNTARY STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CITY OF SACRAMENTO & CHIEF OF POLICE ALBERT NAJERA

Dated: January 4, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

SAMUEL L. JACKSON CITY ATTORNEY

CITY OF SACRAMENTO

/s/ - “Gerald C. Hicks”

By: 

GERALD C. HICKS

Sr. Deputy City Attorney

Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF SACRAMENTO

and CHIEF OF POLICE ALBERT NAJERA

Dated: January 5, 2006 Respectfully submitted,

PORTER, SCOTT, WEIBERG & DELEHANT

/s/ - “Keith E. Nourot”

By: 

KEITH E. NOUROT, Esq.

Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF 

SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT and SACRAMENTO

COUNTY SHERIFF LOU BLANAS

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants CITY OF SACRAMENTO and CHIEF OF POLICE

ALBERT NAJERA may be, and are hereby, dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs.

Dated: January 12, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton

Lawrence K. Karlton

Senior Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00523-LKK -EFB Document 54 Filed 01/13/06 Page 2 of 2