alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION–NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT]



# United States Court of Appeals

**For the First Circuit**

No. 00-1310 FRANK CAMOSCIO, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. ROGER DEMINICO, Defendant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. William G. Young, U.S. District Judge ] Before Torruella, Chief Judge , Boudin and Lipez, Circuit Judges .

Frank Camoscio on brief pro se. Michael A. Goldsmith , Assistant Corporation Counsel, and Merita A. Hopkins , Corporation Counsel, on Motion for Summary Disposition, for appellee.
December 5, 2000-2- Per Curiam . Having thoroughly reviewed the record and the parties' submissions on appeal, we affirm the dismissal of the appellant's complaint on the ground that it is barred by the doctrine of res judicata . Costs to appellee . See Local Rule 27(c); Fed. R. App. P. 39(a)(2).
No. 47334.

#### Protests 993888-G, etc., of Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. (Portland, Maine).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported and that no addition should have been made for planing, or tonguing and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
### DELT A COUNT Y BOAR D O F COMMISSIONER S ADMINISTRATIO N OFFIC E 31 0 LUDfNGTO N STREE T ESCANABA , MICHIGA N 4982 9 PHONE : 906-789-510 0 FAX : 906-789-519 7 Octobe r 26,201 1 S ' ' Denni s J . DeVan y ' " rn^ri S Chief , Essentia l Ai r

Servic e Divisio n > 5=;^"- ^ Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s z z o^^ O 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave. . S.E . l ^ f^'^" Washington . D C 2059 0 i ^ RE:DOT-OST-2003-1512 8 Dciir Mr . DeVany : Th e Deitti Count y Airpor t

Boar dan dDelt aCount y Boar do f Commissioner s hav e considere dth e bi doffer s fo r Essentia l Ai r

Service . W e ar e convince dtha t Delt aAirlines , preferabl y th e # 1 option , present s ou r communit y wit hth e bes t ai r servic e opportunit y an dwil l suppor t

economi c an dairpor t

growth . Delta' s bi di s vita l t o facilitat e consisten t acces s t o anationa l hu b an dth e # 1 optio n o f tw o flight s ada y i s essentia l t o maintai n a minimu mfrequency . Man y o f ou r traveler s us e Sundays , i n particular , a s atrave l day . Th e Detroi t

hu b ha s prove dt o b e an invaluabl e connectio n fo r ou r community , i

t provide s acces s t o ou r

stat e capital , busines s center s an dgloba l exposure . Th e je t servic e t o Detroit , alon g withDelta' s experienc e an dconnections , provide s thi s communit y withrea l growt hopportunity . Delt aCount y Airport' s increase denplanement s i n pas t month s ar e astron g indicato r o f thi s potential . Th e Delt aCount y Aiipor t Boar d an dCount y Boar do f

Commissioner s see s thi s optio n a s ou r bes t chanc e t o generat e mor e airpor t revenu e an dwork

toward s eliminatin g HA S dependency . Tw o year s ag o w e wer e convince dtha t

th e ke y ste p toward s aretur n o f ou r los t boarding s wa s consisten t servic e t o th e Detroi t

hub . Workin g withDelt aAirlines , w e hav e see n ou r passenge r

boarding s increas e ever y month . Than k yo u for providin g u s th e oppormnit y t o commen t o n thi s matte r

an dw e appreciat e yo u consideration . Sincerely . Thoma s Elegeer t

" Conni e Nes s Deh aCount y Boar do f

Commissioners , Chairma n Delt aCount y Airpor t

Delt a Countyi s a n equa l opportunit yprovide ran d employe r
Order entered March 3, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01205-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E. H., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-18908

ORDER

In accordance with our February 24, 2020 order, appellant has provided 

written verification he has requested the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we 

ORDER Janet Saavedra, Official Court Reporter for the 254th Judicial District 

Court, to file the reporter’s record no later than April 3, 2020.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. 

Saavedra and the parties.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
# sec5_balsht_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10V BS - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2019
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Cyco.net,  Inc. (the  "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and results of operation
            of the Company.



                       By: /s/ Daniel Urrea               May 14, 2004
                           -----------------
                       Daniel Urrea
                       Chief Financial Officer
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3960 

AN ACT 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide a good 

faith exception to the imposition of fines for false assertions and certifications, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 3960 ES

1 SECTION 1. GOOD FAITH EXCEPTION TO THE IMPOSITION 

2 OF CERTAIN FINES. 

3 Title 35, United States Code, is amended— 

4 (1) in section 41(j), by inserting ‘‘, unless the 

5 entity shows that the assertion was made in good 

6 faith,’’ before ‘‘be subject’’; and 

7 (2) in section 123(f), by inserting ‘‘, unless the 

8 entity shows that the certification was made in good 

9 faith,’’ before ‘‘be subject’’. 

Passed the Senate June 20, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3960 

AN ACT 

To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide 

other purposes. for false assertions and certifications, and for a good faith exception to the imposition of fines
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet Security Systems, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, the
Senior Vice President Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ RICHARD MACCHIA                       
|Richard Macchia                           
|Senior Vice President Finance and         
|Administration and Chief Financial Officer



May 10, 2005
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133174 & (71)(72) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. ANTHONY DiVERGILIO, JR. and Stephen J. Markman, VICTORIA A. VALENTINE, Justices Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/ Appellants,

v SC: 133174 COA: 261766 Oakland CC: 2000-026598-CZ CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST BLOOMFIELD, Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/ Appellee,

and

WEST BLOOMFIELD WE TLANDS REVIEW BOARD and WEST BLOOMFIELD BOARD OF TRUSTEES. Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file amicus curiae briefs are GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DE NIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be re viewed by this Court.

p1119 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 29, 2007

Clerk
FLETC Form-121-00-03 (4/21)

Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers 

1. Applicant Information

Applicant’s Full Name: Last:

First:

Middle:

Course Number: Course Title: 

Course Dates: Beginning Date: Ending Date: 

DO NOT SUBMIT PAYMENT WITH THIS REQUEST FORM. 

A confirmation letter with details of the training will be provided to the applicant upon confirmation of availability of the seat in the course. Applicants are 

to make travel arrangements only after their requested seat in the course has been confirmed. A request for payment for the actual cost of the training will 

be issued after the program is completed.

2. Financial Reimbursement Information

THIS BLOCK TO BE COMPLETED BY STUDENT OR STUDENT’S AGENCY IF PAYMENT IS NOT BEING FUNDED BY A U.S. GOVERMENT AGENCY 

Card Holder’s Name as it appears on the Credit Card: 

Street Address: City: State: Zip Code: 

Card Holder’s Telephone Number: 

(include country/city codes) 

Card Type: MASTERCARD VISA AMERICAN EXPRESS 

16-Digit Credit Card Number:

3-Digit Security Code: (on

back of credit card) Card Expiration Date: (MM/YYYY) 

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE OF CREDIT CARD HOLDER: 

Note: Unsigned forms will not be processed 

3. Financial Reimbursement Information

THIS BLOCK TO BE COMPLETED BY SPONSORING AGENCY/FMO/FUNDS

CONTROL OFFICER IF FUNDED BY U.S. GOVERNMENT AGENCY BY FISCAL DATA

Agency Location Code (ALC) 

Agency Accounting Data 

Treasury Account Symbol U.S. Federal Agency 

Information 

Tax Identification Number 

Reimbursing Program or 

Organization Name: 

Reimbursing Program or Street Address: 

Organization Address: City: State: Zip Code: 

Telephone Number: 

(Country Code); (City Code) Title: 

Name of Person Authorizing Payment: Email: 

AUTHORIZING SIGNATURE: 

Note: Unsigned forms will not be processed 

RETURN COMPLETED FORMS TO: 

DHS FLETC International Training Division

Federal Law Enforcement Training Center 

1131 Chapel Crossing Road 

Townhouse 393

Glynco, Georgia 31524 

Page 1 of 1

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Foreign National Financial Reimbursement Information 

Obligating Number

FLETC-Intlrqst@fletc.dhs.gov
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Horizon Medical Products,
Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.


/s/ Marshall B. Hunt
-------------------------------------------------
Marshall B. Hunt
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
May 15, 2003
SUMMARY OF SPECIAL COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT WITH EMPLOYEES               EXHIBIT 4.6


     On December 26, 2002, a collective agreement was signed between us, the
General Federation of Labor and our employee committee, which applies to those
of our workers to which collective agreements apply (and not to those who are
employed on personal employment contracts). The contract was for a three year
period, and can be extended for an additional year. The contract established,
among other things: 1) the right of management to terminate the employment of
employees within the framework of the reduction of our banking services, and the
termination procedure; 2) the special benefits and payments to which an employee
is entitled if terminated, including additional severance payments beyond those
set by law and the conversion of the right to additional severance (for
employees with particular seniority and with a particular number of years until
their reaching retirement age); and 3) certain reductions to be made in the
salaries of the employees and the related benefits to which they are entitled.

     On March 14, 2005, the above parties signed a new collective agreement
which extended the term of the above agreement (dated December 26, 2002) until
the termination date of our run-off plan (including any modification or
extension to the plan, approved by the government) or until December 31, 2007,
whichever is first. This new agreement also established and clarified that
employees who under the original agreement are entitled to an early old-age
pension due to the termination of their employment, will be entitled to the
pension until they reach the age from which they will be entitled -in light of
the reform which took place in the pension field after the signing of the
original agreement- to receive a regular old-age pension from the pension fund
in which they are members, and it also established that some of the concessions
to which the employees agreed in the original agreement and which had a time
limit, will continue to apply also during the period of the new agreement.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSEPH C. COLACICCO : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

APOTEX, INC., et al. : NO. 05-5500

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10 day of December, 2009, for the reasons set forth in the foregoing th

Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion To Sever Claims Against

SmithKline Beecham d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline and Transfer Venue (Doc. No. 70) is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

s/Michael M. Baylson

 

Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

O:\CIVIL\05-5500 Colacicco v. Apotex\05-5500 Colacicco v. Apotex - Order re. Mot. Transfer and Sever.wpd
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 57-7 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 3

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 57 Att. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 57-7 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 57-7 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DARRYL MURRAY : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

JOHN McEVOY, DIRECTOR, NATIONAL :

ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, :

MID-ATLANTIC REGION; :

DAVID ROLAND, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR; and :

ALLEN WEINSTEIN, ARCHIVIST : NO. 05-4557

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23 day of March, 2006, it appearing that: rd

a. On August 29, 2005, plaintiff, Darryl Murray, filed a motion to proceed in

forma pauperis.

b. By Order of August 31, 2005, the court granted plaintiff leave to proceed in

forma pauperis, but dismissed his complaint for failure to state a claim for

which relief might be granted.

c. By Order of October 19, 2005, the court directed that plaintiff’s “Requested

Amended Action to Civil Case 05-4557" be deemed an amended complaint

and be filed of record. The court also granted plaintiff’s request for

appointment of counsel and directed that an attorney from the Plaintiffs’

Attorney Employment Panel Program be appointed to represent him. The

case was placed in administrative suspense pending appointment of

counsel.

d. The court has been advised that numerous unsuccessful attempts have

been made to find an attorney to represent plaintiff.

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. This case is REMOVED from administrative suspense.

2. Paragraphs 3 and 4 of this court’s Order of October 19, 2005, directing that counsel

from the Plaintiffs’ Employment Attorney Panel Program be appointed to represent plaintiff are

VACATED.

3. Plaintiff shall proceed pro se unless he is able to find an attorney to represent him.

 /s/ Norma L. Shapiro 

 S. J.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4142 

To increase the penalty for prohibited possession of a phone in a correctional 

facility. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2024 

Mr. OSSOFF (for himself and Mr. GRASSLEY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To increase the penalty for prohibited possession of a phone 

in a correctional facility. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lieutenant Osvaldo 

5 Albarati Stopping Prison Contraband Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITED POSSESSION OF A PHONE. 

7 Section 1791(b) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘or 

10 (d)(1)(F)’’ after ‘‘(d)(1)(B)’’; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4142 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (4), by striking ‘‘, (d)(1)(E), 

2 or (d)(1)(F)’’ and inserting ‘‘or (d)(1)(E)’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
ICRAS 1403 1845 - 0022 v 9

– Affected Public - In dividuals 9 / 27 /2013

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number 1845 - 0022 is expiring. This collection contains sections of the regulations at 34 CFR Part 668

– Student Assistance General Provisions. The regulations establish the standards to participate in the student financial aid assistance programs authorized by Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965, (HEA), as amended. These regulations establish institutional requirements in various areas of program administration. These regulations are an effort to minimize administrative burden for program participants, provide benefits to eligible Title IV, HEA program rec ipients, and protect the taxpay ers' interest from fraud and abuse of program funds. 34 CFR 668.22

– Treatment of title IV finds when a student withdraws This section describes the steps the institution must take in determining the eligibility of, and amount of Federal student aid a student who has withdrawn from all courses before the conclusion of the academic period may retain and what must be repaid b y either the institution, the student, or both. Respondents Responses Hours 45,075 425,075 318,806 TOTAL S Responses 425,075 Respondents 425,075 Burden Hours 318,806
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


October 11, 2016


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 270


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on October 10, 2016, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-212829) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO
	 	Gerardo Cipriano
	 	Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001052636
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-24-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   876,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               892,249
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 892,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,949
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    850,000
<COMMON>                                        26,300
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   892,249
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,846
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,846
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>