alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

ESSEX PORTFOLIO, L.P.
                     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Keith R. Guericke, Chief Executive Officer of Essex Property Trust,
Inc., the general partner of the registrant Essex Portfolio, L.P., certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Essex Portfolio,
L.P.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

1. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
2. The general partner's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
3. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
4. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
5. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

1. The general partner's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the general partner's auditors and the audit committee of the
general partner's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

1. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data; and
2. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

May 17, 2004

By: /s/ KEITH R. GUERICKE

Keith R. Guericke
                  Chief Executive Officer
                  Essex Property Trust, Inc., general partner of
                  Essex Portfolio, L.P.

---

---
**Exhibit 24(a)**

 

AMERIPRISE CERTIFICATE COMPANY

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

City of Minneapolis

 

State of Minnesota

 

Each of the undersigned as a director of Ameriprise Certificate Company, a face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, hereby constitutes and appoints William F. (Ted) Truscott, Ross P. Palacios, David K. Stewart, Scott R. Plummer and Christopher O. Petersen or any one of them, as his or her attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign for him or her in his or her name, place and stead any and all registration statements and amendments thereto (with all exhibits and other documents required or desirable in connection therewith) that may be prepared from time to time in connection with said Company’s existing or future face-amount certificate products — whether pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Investment Company Act of 1940 or otherwise — and periodic and other reports, and amendments thereto, including those on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, as required pursuant to provisions of applicable federal securities laws, and any necessary or appropriate filings with states or other jurisdictions, and grants to any or all of them the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act required or necessary or appropriate in connection with such signatures or filings.

 

Signed on this 2nd day of March, 2010

 

 
| /s/   Rodney P. Burwell |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Rodney   P. Burwell     |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Jean B. Keffeler    |   |
| Jean B. Keffeler        |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ Karen M. Bohn       |   |
| Karen M. Bohn           |   |

 

----
Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB   Document 14   Filed 06/03/05   Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB   Document 14   Filed 06/03/05   Page 2 of 2

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2016-08-08T10:04:08-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of First BancTrust Corporation (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                                      /s/ Terry J. Howard
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Terry J. Howard
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 President


Date:  March 27, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Bernard Berk, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the
  dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented.

|                        |  |                            
|----------------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date:
November 14, 2007 |  | /s/
	    Bernard Berk      
|                        |  | Bernard Berk               
|                        |  | Chief Executive Officer of 
|                        |  | Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

This certification has been furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and will be retained by Elite Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
AVAQMD Rule 218 and 218.1 

B-3

Continuous Emission Monitoring 

Final Staff Report: 08/24/12
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 201o-NM-078-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES () explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
No. 52251.

protests 69301-K, etc. (New York).

#### Heir Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Mot becercey tL "Ss. PLE ER 2

Ee lber tlicwct 7. Lewecsl too. vé er ee
_ bere dexiphepe- the. weg secock. Kecseekes(
— naan seuccdiltzec. fa. J Thc. ann



Attorney-Client Privileged
Communication ft |
HRS my)

Tau the Merwe cof ALLALY

CLERK, Us. CLERK, US, DISiRICT COURT |
ALEXAN!

ie

_ ane Cov ene of ALLAL. y— Zcccertescr) Maeessencec(

Les coloe, tlre 22 AE COL ,. often ss

ff fpectiwe clyfuse bey etsercly wcedlvecliwe eed

~ Sp pocesscine cosvecclebecoer ofc oe Lrrinecedl,

. Teale tee soncloal of vege Olof asede.. bay

 ealesung | CX Crees So Defeeae. L oeffesepetcalilia

i eteclore | tos Le yemeeerl eee Bede. ole fere® eof’ the _
Cf Het LLLAY the Meat MY ercefacl leon Geece. fo nce.

a a a Cocewe. of ALL AL. ; Zeneca wos one
ocepect corptelely thee eeypaeseliorer of
. 7 the US. s Se. called apparnted Ca ; tft a

Necirbreser, Seach , Me Mealicorr _ . ie
it

arel shesicwepoctiz clecumece bay ceveol tleene


Attomney-Client Privileged
Communication

es caartileecice

, Sbxuve of La. Zeeceeseeed. Mesersetceece” .

. “ll eescyee eye aclu, cageuccest. tle US. Peporctanesat
of se cobbled" A Festbceal flee veray rereccess
_pruscocelucl scecwers, eal Pall con oeckey Wy axgbas
7 ue ee oo - SC

= / Sbeue. of ALLA. w, Zercasias Meocessacee? oa

lice we Ve eles Lee _ the. Leary ber lone praongy

te cesta We Lt e/a Lea} vaacalice aud |

chet vestscclig of Us ¢ xen 7 . 7 “lees Meortsice Cevseseger
cle. las Ue only, eall vol cxautin Ley

. seep rceseuteteac te, bo Me US Coens cet wey belial/

quel Cosel oe
Aeeseng Mey J2>CeL ELEC ix tle vs eaescel pcoame ceck i coe,


Attorney-Client Privileged

Communication 2 G 3
_ a coped ae

- ALE. eo cntle cortices’ lxcecol veccalescrcal LEI (ae

US. Caceselhy Caller Seccetedy Clewaccce _
. ceed ret Loe enlilod te. Ceca ge. bet. eet
- : Coozeersecart corkcter core seellelreree. cub. sf _

see c licckert Ketst ivi feuuyer, corecceteseeg

ony oupect. of may 26 Coehe. ne Seplenel i @,).

_— ai Leh | - | —_ a
Aloe Recbceol A Z Sealrrcceese

CRC cee LOS Meeeesnecoeed Phuce Bor Mewerancceee ee
TC here. Seclteaced_.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN F. SNOW, No. CIV S-04-0443-LKK-CMK

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

EDWARD ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, brings this civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 28, 2004, the court dismissed plaintiff’s

complaint with leave to amend and directed plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 30 days. 

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s May 28, 2004, order was denied on July 28,

2004. To date, plaintiff has failed to file an amended complaint as directed by the court.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-00443-LKK -CMK Document 10 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall show cause in

writing, within 20 days of the date of service of this order, why this action should not be

dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with rules and court order. See Local

Rule 11-110. 

DATED: September 21, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 

Case 2:04-cv-00443-LKK -CMK Document 10 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 3/7/2023 1

An Accusation 

of Widespread Fraudulent Registrations 

Golisano v. Pataki (John Gleeson, E.D.N.Y. 1:02-cv-4784) 

The district judge denied enhanced identification requirements at a 

minor party’s primary election for governor on allegations of widespread recent fraudulent registrations. 

Subject: Voter identification. Topics: Registration challenges; 

voter identification; primary election; matters for state courts. 

Twelve days before the September 10, 2002, Independence Party gubernatorial primary election in New York, a candidate for governor, a candidate for 

lieutenant governor, and three voters filed a federal complaint in the Eastern 

District of New York complaining that the incumbent governor was leading 

a scheme to create large numbers of fraudulent Independence Party registrations in an effort to win the party’s nomination.1

On the day after the complaint was filed, Judge John Gleeson signed an 

order that defendants show cause on September 5 why newly registered Independence Party voters should not show proof of identification.2

 At the 

hearing, Judge Gleeson denied the plaintiffs immediate relief.3 Following the 

lead plaintiff’s victory in the primary election, Judge Gleeson granted the 

plaintiffs a voluntary dismissal.4

1. Complaint, Golisano v. Pataki, No. 1:02-cv-4784 (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2002), D.E. 1. 

2. Order, id. (Sept. 4, 2002), D.E. 3. 

Judge Gleeson resigned on March 9, 2016. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory 

of Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/page/judges.html. 

3. Order, Golisano, No. 1:02-cv-4784 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 5, 2002, filed Sept. 10, 2002), D.E. 

26; see Tom Precious, Candidates Clash Over Calls About Sabres, Buffalo News, Sept. 6, 2002, 

at C1 (reporting that a state-court action also was unsuccessful). 

4. Order, Golisano, No. 1:02-cv-4784 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 30, 2002), D.E. 74.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abgenix, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



November 14,
2003

| |  | /s/RAYMOND M. WITHYRaymond M. Withy, Ph.D. President and Chief Executive
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Abgenix, Inc. and will be retained by Abgenix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH   Document 137   Filed 09/21/06   Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH   Document 137   Filed 09/21/06   Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-01358-WBS-GGH   Document 137   Filed 09/21/06   Page 3 of 3

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2015-09-02T11:07:04-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust-Series A
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          

<CIK>               1051822

<NAME>              World Monitor Trust-Series A
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-START>                  Jun-10-1998

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-25-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos

<CASH>                          8,809,200

<SECURITIES>                    45,224

<RECEIVABLES>                   38,019

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                8,892,443

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,892,443

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           99,938

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      8,792,505

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,892,443

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                512,401

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                261,139

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    251,262

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   3.21

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 6/14/2023 1

New School-Board Elections 

to Accommodate the Decennial Census 

Cox v. Donaldson 

(George Howard, Jr., E.D. Ark. 5:02-cv-319) 

Three school-board members filed a federal complaint on September 3, 2002, to enjoin a September 17 school-board election. Five 

school-board directors served staggered five-year terms, and the 

opening of all seats to new elections was intended to accommodate 

the 2000 census data. On the day after the election, the district 

judge issued an agreed order temporarily enjoining certification of 

the election. The following May, the parties agreed that the election 

would be certified only for the position with the expired term. 

Subject: District lines. Topics: Enjoining elections; enjoining 

certification. 

On September 3, 2002, three school-board members filed a federal complaint 

in the Eastern District of Arkansas against Chicot County’s clerk and its 

board of election commissioners to enjoin a September 17 school-board election.1

 The complaint alleged “an intent to eliminate African American presence on the Lakeside School Board” by vacating all positions—five directors 

serving five-year terms staggered so that one term expired each year—and 

holding new elections.2 With their complaint, the plaintiffs filed a motion for 

a preliminary injunction.3

On the day after the election, Judge George Howard, Jr., issued an agreed 

order enjoining certification of the election results pending further orders of 

the court.4 On the next day, the defendants explained in response to the injunction motion that the election was called to accommodate decennial redistricting.5

On May 21, 2003, Judge Howard granted a stipulated motion to dismiss 

the case, reciting the parties’ agreement that the election would be certified 

for only one of the board positions.6

1. Complaint, Cox v. Donaldson, No. 5:02-cv-319 (E.D. Ark. Sept. 3, 2002), D.E. 1. 

2. Id. at 2–4. 

3. Preliminary-Injunction Motion, id. (Sept. 3, 2002), D.E. 2. 

4. Order, id. (Sept. 18, 2002), D.E. 5. 

Judge Howard died on April 21, 2007. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of 

Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

5. Response, Cox, No. 5:02-cv-319 (E.D. Ark. Sept. 19, 2002), D.E. 7. 

6. Order, id. (May 21, 2003), D.E. 16.
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2014-0579

Docket Number

2014-SW-020-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM

AgustaWestland S.p.A. Bollettino Tecnico (BT) No. 109S-49, BT No. 109SP-052, and 

BT No. 119-50, all Revision A, and all dated December 3, 2013

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

C/O KISSINGER, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO.: 2:04-cv-0878-GEB-DAD (PC)

ORDER

Defendants request a one-week extension of time to file their opposition to plaintiff’s

motion for summary judgment and their cross motion for summary judgment. Good cause

appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants are granted a one-week extension of time,

up and until Tuesday, October 7, 2008, to oppose plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and

to file their cross motion for summary judgment.

DATED: October 1, 2008.

/davi0878.36msj

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 138 Filed 10/02/08 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Internet Security Systems, Inc.(the “Company”) for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Boardof the Company, certifies that:

 

(1)        The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/  THOMAS E. NOONAN    |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
| Thomas  E. Noonan        |
| Chairman,  President and |
| Chief  Executive Officer |
|                     |
| May  5, 2006             |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Brian R. Ervine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of EvolvingSystems, Inc.

 
| /s/ BRIAN R.  ERVINE                                                     |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian R. Ervine                                                          |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer |
| May 5, 2006                                                         |

 

This certification isfurnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Suchcertification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it byreference.

 

----
No. 54022.

#### A. I. Namm & Son et al. *v.*United States,

protests 505453-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.