alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameriprise Certificate
Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
William F. Truscott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Brian J.
McGrane, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.

/s/    William F. Truscott
--------------------------
Name:  William F. Truscott
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 1, 2007

/s/    Brian J. McGrane
-----------------------
Name:  Brian J. McGrane
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 1, 2007

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability
under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated
by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and
specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
.~ - -


### sP > !l r► F i q ' + ~ v r 

## ~ y t ~,~r ib J1t, 

## ~ ,r



## ~ ' 

# '~ t,.ii ~.~ ;-:ua'a.'?:. ~.~+~rat~Sr}~~ itisrf . . t r ft rt r ls t. . J .l,.r.i r ~ l? ' t ~ l.f. ~ ~ •ifi.r <-.5-'.



# ~ n .. ... ... 

# ~ ._.. 1N ♦aP .i ....- Nr .!'Sr... ) "W a 

### ~ !• 

### ~ YS+r 0. 

### ~~Y ~~ ~ S ~;f ~ 

### rS11tJ1t7r

. r ~k y ~ ,D 

### i[2' tk t ~'~ a ,.l. 

### ~~'~ 

# ~r r O~ 

# ICj` ~~J r •,:~~' • ~1C~1 ~~~ ~~~~ 

# Fkr E]

~ 

# 7 ~ } x

# , ~



# _ i ' 3L4 - ~



## ~ '' ._..,+ >... I.i.... 

## ~ .>.> 7.i. 

## ~ , .J. 

## ~ aw 

## ~ - Eti~u ~~. ,~ z;.a4• ,.1~ s.. ~ : ~ ~ K , r, _- ~ q k ~~ ` R ` ~ w•• -ftJ^aqj re~ ~ . ~ '. r„ ~ .,,+.,, _ ..3.- ~ tlb 

## 5

~ r • 

## ~ , ; . 

## ~ ir' St . 

## ~ .. ' 

## ~~~.s~~
, r- ' S Tr' 'i: t ri. Yk .. 

## ~~ 11•.

.. - ., aps l SS 

## SSt. 

## ~ . $.t 

## ~ "d r ~'~ ..

~ -. v . 

## ~-~ •
. l~ 

## ~~ f 

## v r~ a-a t~ 

## ~ sN ~~ v
~~~~ lF <• i tt



### ~ 

# P

~ ` 

# l f

. B ! .
~ 

# 4s EGIAL}$1{APS • ~ y 

# &"+ '

~ 

# R j

~ 

### ~~ {

~ 

### ~ i ~ 

# IC E

~ q 

### ~~~ 

# ~

.... 

# ~ ..,-. 

# ~ :..'. 

# ~
..... 

# ~~ `ZS•y i 

# ~~ tL• 

# ~ .

S"

- ." . -- . .5?c.tRT 

# ~Y~Ss~

T ~ :T!` . .... '



# ~ ✓ • 

# ~ 1i >N 

# Na m Y



# April 19, 2013

Alex Cristafaro, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency David Rostker, U.S. Small Business Administration, 0ffice of Advocacy Cortney , Higgins, U.S. Office of Management and Budget Dear Mr. Cristafaro, Mr. Rostker, and Ms. Higgins: 

# ; am writing today as ihe President of a small brick manufacturing company that has the potential to be significantly impacted by the upcorning MACT sfiandard for major sources in the brick and structural clay processing industry. W.e are not a formal Small Entity Representative (SER) in the current review p.aneL being conducted under ttie Small Ciusiness Regulator Enforcement Fairness-Act (SBREFA): We are also not members of the Brick industry Association (BlA). However, all of our industry is warking together with the BIA on this critical rulemaking and they are keeping us apprised of the activities on this rule. We consider them to be speaking on ali industry's behalf as they work with you. The proposed MACT standard will severely impact us and would most likely put us out of business in the current economic climate. Even if business were booming, it would be diff icult to survive since it would be hard to obtain financing and this would increase the cost of our brick by over

- 20%. This malces it very ciifficult to be competitive and to remain in business. Sincereiy,



# ~ i~ ,•-,- 

### ~ r-, '` t" , i r 

### ~;~ 

### !! f

- 

### L:.tilr r' ~ ~. j,:. ✓ ' 

### ~ •.. 

### ~ / ZC. 

### ~ : 

### ~ 9 J" 

# J. Murr

~

a y 

# X re-s 

# mas ident 

# ~



# (
TSNJi/I:ac
No. 61827.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States,

protests 312726-K and 325950-K (Seattle).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 55216.

#### A. Schulman, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 140277-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6235

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSEPH A. BOONE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District

Judge. (CR-95-227-H, CA-96-3683)

Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph A. Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Boone, Nos. CR-95-227-H; CA-96-3683 (D. Md.

Jan. 22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 47839.

#### Protest 20125-K of M. Shoenthal, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items consist of hats or hoods of ramie and cellophane the same as those involved in Abstract 47291. In accordance therewith, they were held dutiable at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2018 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif , as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Jason S. Bartylla , as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:February 26, 2019By/s/ Abu M. ArifAbu M. ArifChief Executive Officer


Date:February 26, 2019By/s/ Jason S. BartyllaJason S. BartyllaChief Financial Officer











E-6
No. 66808.

#### Hartford Spinning, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 267996-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste composed of synthetic materials, not *eo nomine*specified in the tariff act, and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
September 24, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MARY SHAVERS, ERMA HARRIS, WANDA COLLINS, DIANA OFFORD,

JOEL COCKRELL, CHARLES RANDLE, WALTER DAVIS, REVERAND GILMORE, BINNIE SHELLEY, GLORIA SIMMONS, BENNY SOLOMON, MERCHERA BURRELL, JAMES BURRELL, CAROLYN RANDLE, BESSIE COCKRELL, MARY ANDERSON, ROBERT BLACKMAN, OSCAR COCKRELL, WINTER GORDON, JR, EDDIE ANDERSON, TOMMY BLACKMON, JOHN BLACKMON, DONALD RODGERS, JOYC E STEIN, ELLA BANKS, VIOLA RANDLE, ROSIE BEAL, GOKI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 15

- 00169

- CV V.

LINEBARGER GOGGAN BL AIR & SAMPSON, FORT BEND COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR COLLECTOR, AND FORT BEND APPRAI SAL DISTRICT

, A ppellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard appellee's motion to dismiss the appeal from the order signed by the court below on January 6, 2015. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Diogu Kalu Diogu II.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

          - [P-12514-000, Indiana] 

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, and Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) regulations (18 CFR part 380), Commission staff has reviewed the application for license for the Norway-Oakdale Project and have prepared a final environmental assessment (FEA) for the project. The project is located on the Tippecanoe River in Carroll and White counties, Indiana. 

In this FEA, Commission staff analyzes the probable environmental effects of implementing the project and conclude that approval of the project, with appropriate staff-recommended environmental measures, would not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. 

                    Copies of the FEA are available for review in Public Reference Room 2-A of the Commission's offices at 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC. The FEA also may be viewed on the Commission's Internet Web site (                    *http://www.ferc.gov*) using the “eLibrary” link. Additional information about the project is available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs at (202) 502-6088, or on the Commission's website using the “eLibrary” link. For assistance with eLibrary, contact                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov;*                     call toll-free at (866) 208-3676; or, for TTY, contact (202) 502-8659.                 

                    For further information, please contact Sergiu Serban (202) 502-6211 or at                     *sergiu.serban@ferc.gov.*

Magalie R. Salas, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7-3346 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of American Express
Certificate Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paula R. Meyer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Brian
J. McGrane, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d)
              of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.



   /s/ Paula R. Meyer
   --------------------
Name:  Paula R. Meyer
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:   March 29, 2004



   /s/ Brian J. McGrane
   --------------------
Name:  Brian J. McGrane
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 29, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Information

&"Calibri"&11&K000000 NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#_x000D_		

# FIDS - Orders

&"Calibri"&11&K000000 NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#_x000D_		

# Version

&"Calibri"&11&K000000 NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#_x000D_
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,747,074              16,169,749
<SECURITIES>                                15,709,803               2,824,417
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,288,888               6,775,806
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (579,085)               (341,942)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            24,147,136              26,364,207
<PP&E>                                       3,987,432               3,852,245
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,983,395)             (1,569,489)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,888,971              35,647,691
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,547,468               5,192,345
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        34,818                  34,818
<OTHER-SE>                                     372,167               (315,883)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,888,975              35,647,691
<SALES>                                     13,930,629              16,630,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,930,629              16,630,819
<CGS>                                       10,522,872              11,059,173
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,727                  40,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,057,559)                 430,570
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                  48,607
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,057,559)               (479,777)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.27)                   (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.27)                   (.03)



</TABLE>
No. 48485.

#### Protests 58437-K/12308, etc., of Langfelder, Homma & Hayward, Inc., et al. (New Orleans, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 48476.

#### Protests 95111-K, etc., of Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. (New York).

*200Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH STAFFORD, an individual, )

) 2:04-cv-0047-GEB-EFB

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER

v. )

)

UNITED TREASURES, INC., a ) 

Washington corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

)

Since I have already spent considerable time preparing draft

jury instructions for the impending trial of this action and

mistakenly assumed the parties’ proposed instructions filed 

September 9, 2005, would be numbered “in a manner that shows where

each . . . instruction should be placed in the . . . instructions,”

(Final Pretrial Order, June 21, 2005, at 15), the parties are directed

to file a complete set of the preliminary and closing jury

instructions they desire no later than October 5, 2006.

Further, since Plaintiff contends the notice given to

Defendant’s counsel constituted substantial performance of notice

required by contract, sufficient reason has not been provided for

including Plaintiff’s additional notice instruction.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00047-GEB-EFB Document 149 Filed 09/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

The parties need only include the first sentence of their

proposed instruction No. 3 since I need not tell the jury about

answering a specific question on the jury verdict form.

The parties shall meet again to discuss Defendant’s

objections to this Court’s proposed jury instructions Nos. 9 and 10. 

Agreement should be reachable on these instructions.

Defendant’s objection to instruction No. 12 is sustained. 

(See Parties’ Joint Submission Re Additional Jury Instructions and

Verdict Forms, Sept. 9, 2005, at 23.)

Unless Defendant explains how it will be prejudiced if

Plaintiff’s position on how to prevent double recovery is adopted,

Plaintiff’s position will be adopted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 13, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00047-GEB-EFB Document 149 Filed 09/14/06 Page 2 of 2
U.S. Department ofTransportation, Could you please attach the following page with my signature to the 1';:" , : • 0 , •**l-.~ritf** ,;·.ft ..._L{ 

## 8 in regards to a 333 exemption that is currently pending review. 

### Thank you for your consideration. Chris Smith
EXHIBIT 21(a).  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                             State of
Name                                         Organization

Irwin Union Bank and Trust Company                     Indiana
     Irwin Union Collateral, Inc.                      Indiana
     Irwin Union Realty Corporation                    Indiana
     Irwin Union Insurance, Inc.                       Indiana
     Irwin Union Securities, Inc.                      Indiana

IFC Mortgage Corporation                               Indiana
     Irwin Mortgage Corporation                        Indiana

Irwin Union Investor Services, Inc.                    Indiana
     Irwin Union Advisory Services, Inc.               Indiana

Irwin Home Equity Corporation                          Indiana
     IHE Funding Corp.                                 Delaware

Irwin Equipment Finance Corp.                          Indiana
    Affiliated Capital Corp.(1)                        Illinois

Irwin Union Credit Insurance Corporation               Arizona

White River Capital Corporation                        Indiana

IFC Capital Trust I                                    Delaware

(1)80% owned by Registrant