alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

D.L. RUNNELS, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:04-cv-776-TLN-EFB P 

ORDER REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL 

SETTLEMENT STATEMENTS FOR 

PRISONER SETTLEMENT PROGRAM 

Once again, the parties to this action shall each, no later than thirty (30) days from the date 

of the order, submit confidential statements as described below. The confidential statements shall 

not be served on the opposing party or filed with the court, but instead, delivered by mail, fax, 

email or personal delivery to the court’s Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) division at the 

address, fax number or email address below and marked “Confidential.” Such statements shall be 

limited to five (5) pages and shall include the following: 

1. The party’s assessment of whether the instant action is of the type that would 

benefit from a settlement proceeding; 

2. The party’s assessment of what factors, if any, will prevent settlement of this 

matter prior to trial; and 

3. Any additional information the court may find useful in determining whether to set 

this matter for a settlement conference. 

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 255 Filed 12/18/13 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Should the court determine that this action is appropriate for referral to the Prisoner 

Settlement Program, it will set this matter for settlement conference before a magistrate judge or 

district judge. If not, the court will direct the parties to file pretrial statements. 

 IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: December 18, 2013. 

cc: ADR Division, Attention: Sujean Park 

 US District Court 

 501 I Street, Suite 4-200 

 Sacramento, CA 95814 

 Fax: (916) 491-3912 

 email: spark@caed.uscourts.gov 

 

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 255 Filed 12/18/13 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICKY HAMMONDS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0909 MCE GGH P

vs.

I. REYES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On September 7, 2005, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. That

document was not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted to

the court for consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to

be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has

filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendants, then documents submitted by

plaintiff must be served on that attorney and not on the defendants. Every document submitted

conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate

stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and

the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s September 7, 2005 notice of change of address

Case 2:04-cv-00909-MCE -GGH Document 54 Filed 10/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

on counsel for defendants and shall file proper proof of said service. Plaintiff is cautioned that

failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff is further

cautioned that failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and

failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed.

DATED: 10/6/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DAD:kf

hamm0909.35a

Case 2:04-cv-00909-MCE -GGH Document 54 Filed 10/06/05 Page 2 of 2
UV Curable Ink Formulation and Use for NCS
----

|                                        |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                        |  |  |
|                                   |   |   |
| ATTEST:                                |   | KAMAN CORPORATION |
|                                   |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
| /s/ Shawn G. Lisle                     |   | By: /s/ William C. Denninger         |
| Shawn G. Lisle                         |   | William C. Denninger |
| Senior Vice President, General Counsel |   | Executive Vice President and Chief |
| and Assistant Secretary                |   | Financial Officer |
|                                   |   |   |
|                                   |   |   |
(Reap. Dec. 11011)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. v. United States

Entry No. 9146-H.

(Decided June 15, 1965)

*Sharp é Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, *for the*defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by ithe undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and 'the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to 'all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
### Docket Number EPA-R09-OAR-2009-0598 Eric C. Massey t o : Anita Lee 10/28/2009 05:49 PM
Cc: "Patrick J. Cunningham", "Nancy C. Wrona", "Ira M. Domsky" History: This message has been forwarded.

Dear Dr. Lee: Attached to this e-mail the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality's formal comments on EPA's advanced notice of proposed rulemaking regarding the visibility impacts of the Navajo Generating Station and the Four Corners Power Plant as published in the Federal Register on August 28, 2009 (74 Federal Register 44313), docket number EPA-R09-OAR- 2009-0598. If you have any questions regarding this e-mail transmission, please contact me at (602) 771-2288. Sincerely, Eric C. Massey, Manager Air Quality Compliance Section Arizona Department of Environmental Quality e-mail: ecm @ azdeq

. gov phone: (602) 771-2288 fax: (602) 771-2299

NOTICE: This e-mail (and any attachments) may contain PRIVILEGED OR CONFIDENTIAL information and is intended only for the use of the specific individual(s) to whom it is addressed. It may contain information that is privileged and confidential under state and federal law. This information may be used or disclosed only in accordance with law, and you may be subject to penalties under law for improper use or further disclosure of the information in this e-mail and its attachments. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the person named above by reply e-mail, and then delete the original e-mail. Thank you.
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

89–011 2001

107th Congress, 1st Session – – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document 107–33

2000 SECTION 102(b) REPORT

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

THE OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE

TRANSMITTING

A REPORT ON THE APPLICABILITY TO THE LEGISLATIVE BRANCH

OF FEDERAL LAW RELATING TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF

EMPLOYMENT AND ACCESS TO PUBLIC SERVICES AND ACCOMMODATIONS, PURSUANT TO SECTION 102(b) OF THE CONGRESSIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1995

JANUARY 30, 2001.—Referred jointly to the Committees on Education and

the Workforce and House Administration, and ordered to be printed

(1)

OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE,

Washington, DC, January 24, 2001.

Hon. J. DENNIS HASTERT,

Speaker of the House, House of Representatives,

The Capitol, Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. SPEAKER: Section 102(b) of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (CAA) mandates a review and report on the applicability to the legislative branch of federal law relating to terms

and conditions of employment and access to public services and accommodations.

Pursuant to section 102(b)(2) of the CAA, which provides that the

presiding officers of the House of Representatives and the Senate

shall cause each such report to be printed in the Congressional

Record and each report shall be referred to the committees of the

House of Representatives and the Senate with jurisdiction, the

Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance is pleased to transmit the enclosed report.

Sincerely yours,

SUSAN S. ROBFOGEL,

Chair of the Board of Directors.

Enclosures.

(3)

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 16, 2018

No. 04-18-00220-CR

Gilbert TELLO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CRN000013-D1

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Cynthia Perez Lenz’s notification of late record is hereby NOTED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of August, 2018.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Docket Number FAA - 2013 - 1025
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          18,781               1,936,194
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   52,325                 106,962
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,106               2,387,196
<PP&E>                                          91,788                 474,053
<DEPRECIATION>                                  54,048                 114,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 218,146               6,246,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,461                 401,620
<BONDS>                                              0               2,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                         4,390                   6,909
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,150               3,157,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   218,146               6,246,803
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               365,010               1,970,688
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  469,463               6,282,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,008                 460,482
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (105,461)             (4,771,836)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (105,461)             (4,771,836)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (105,461)             (4,771,836)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.024)                  (.729)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.024)                  (.729)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haig J. Nargesian,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                              By:  /s/ HAIG J. NARGESIAN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Haig J. Nargesian *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: November 9, 2005
______________________

* Haig J. Nargesian functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
U.S. flagAn official website of the United States government
        Here's how you know
            Navegar a la página de inicio en españolDot gov**Official websites use .gov**
          
          A
          **.gov**
          website belongs to an official government organization in the United
          States.
    Https**Secure .gov websites use HTTPS**
          
          A
          **lock**
          (
          A locked padlock
          ) or
          **https://**
          means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive
          information only on official, secure websites. HomeFIND A PROVIDEREnter Search Term(s):

  Protect the life you’ve built.

No home is completely safe from the risk of flooding. If you’re not protected, you could be stuck paying for costly damage all on your own. Just one inch of flood water can cost you roughly $25,000.

A National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) policy covers direct physical losses to your structure and belongings.

Learn more about building and contents coverage. Speak to a flood insurance provider today about how to protect your home.

FIND AN INSURANCE PROVIDER





Useful Resources

What’s My Risk?

Understand the flood risk to your area with our interactive model.

FLOOD MAPS

What's the Cost?

Use our tool to see how much flood damage - even from just a few inches of water - could cost you.

COST OF FLOODING

What’s Covered?

Understand the difference between flood insurance and homeowner’s insurance.

POLICY COVERAGE
Protect Your Corner Of The World
With Flood Insurance.

How to Buy Flood Insurance
My Flood Story.

Hear from real life flood survivors as they share their experiences battling high waters and rebuilding their lives with help from flood insurance.

FIND AN INSURANCE PROVIDER





FEMA | National Flood Insurance Program
                        500 C St SW,
            Washington,
            D.C.
            20472 Disaster Assistance:
          (800) 621-FEMA An official website of the Department of Homeland Security
 **Need Help?** About Us Contact Us Glossary Privacy Policy Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
 **Related Links** Footer Accordion Links
  

        


    
    
            Partner Sites
          No Fear Data Act

      
    
      
        Freedom of Information Act

      
    
      
        Office of the Inspector General

      
    
      
        Whitehouse.gov

      
    
      
        DHS.gov

      
    
      
        USA.gov
 FEMA.gov Ready.gov DisasterAssistance.gov Accessibility Plug-Ins
 **Connect with NFIP**
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4090 

To withhold Federal funding from any college or university that employs 

illegal aliens on campus. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 9, 2024 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. HAWLEY, and Mr. COTTON) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To withhold Federal funding from any college or university 

that employs illegal aliens on campus. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Enforcing the Rule 

5 of Law on Campus Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INELIGIBILITY OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES 

7 THAT EMPLOY ILLEGAL ALIENS TO RECEIVE 

8 FEDERAL FUNDING. 

9 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any in10 stitution of higher education (as defined in section 102 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4090 IS

1 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002)) 

2 with a policy or practice of employing aliens who are un3 lawfully present in the United States at any campus of 

4 such institution in violation of section 274A of the Immi5 gration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a) shall be in6 eligible to receive any Federal funding. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 4/24/2023 1

Exclusion from the Ballot 

Because of Invalid Ballot-Petition Signatures 

Briscoe v. Biggs (Eric F. Melgren, D. Kan. 2:10-cv-2488) 

A would-be independent candidate for Congress filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus ordering his inclusion on the November ballot on the grounds that he was excluded because of improperly invalidated ballot-petition signatures. The court denied immediate relief for lack of a likelihood of success on the merits and to 

protect the public interest in orderly elections. 

Subject: Getting on the ballot. Topics: Getting on the ballot; pro 

se party. 

A would-be independent candidate for Congress filed on September 7, 2010, 

in the District of Kansas’s Kansas City courthouse a pro se federal petition 

for a writ of mandamus ordering his inclusion on the November ballot on 

the grounds that he had been excluded because of improperly invalidated 

ballot-petition signatures.1

 On September 13, the candidate filed motions for 

a preliminary injunction and a temporary restraining order to expedite consideration of the case and for summary judgment.2

On September 16, Judge Eric F. Melgren denied the candidate immediate 

relief.3 “The Court cannot conclude that Plaintiff has demonstrated, or can 

demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, nor that the injunction 

would not adversely affect the public interest in orderly elections.”4

Ruling on pending motions, Judge Melgren dismissed the action on April 

27, 2011, because of mootness, Eleventh Amendment immunity for state officials acting in official capacities, and quasijudicial immunity for state officials acting in their individual capacities.5

1. Petition, Briscoe v. Biggs, No. 2:10-cv-2488 (D. Kan. Sept. 7, 2010), D.E. 1. 

2. Motions, id. (Sept. 13, 2010), D.E. 6–8. 

3. Opinion, id. (Sept. 16, 2010), D.E. 11. 

4. Id. 

5. Opinion, id. (Sept. 7, 2010), D.E. 27.
----

----

III Bekanntmachungen

Europäische Arzneimittel-Agentur

----

STELLENAUSSCHREIBUNG FÜR DIE EUROPÄISCHE ARZNEIMITTEL-AGENTUR (LONDON)

(2006/C 254 A/01)

Aufgabe der Agentur ist es, die Beurteilung und Überwachung von Human- und Tierarzneimitteln in der Europäischen Union zu koordinieren (siehe Verordnung (EG) Nr. 726/2004 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 31. März 2004, Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L  136 vom 30. April 2004, S. 1). Die EMEA nahm im Januar 1995 ihre Tätigkeit auf. Ihre Arbeit bedingt zahlreiche enge Kontakte zur Europäischen Kommission, den 25 Mitgliedstaaten der Europäischen Union, den EWR-/EFTA-Ländern und vielen anderen staatlichen und privatwirtschaftlichen Stellen.

Nähere Informationen über die EMEA und ihre Tätigkeiten sind im Internet auf ihrer Website unter http://www.emea.europa.eu/ abrufbar.

Die Europäische Arzneimittel-Agentur führt mehrere Auswahlverfahren im Hinblick auf die Erstellung eine Eignungsliste für folgende Stelle durch:

Die ausgewählten Bewerber werden in eine Eignungsliste aufgenommen; in Abhängigkeit von der Haushaltslage wird ihnen gegebenenfalls ein fünfjähriger verlängerbarer Arbeitsvertrag in Übereinstimmung mit den für die sonstigen Bediensteten der Europäischen Gemeinschaften geltenden Regelungen angeboten (Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften L  56 vom 4. März 1968).

Dienstort ist London.

Die Bewerber müssen Staatsangehörige eines Mitgliedstaats der Europäischen Gemeinschaften oder Islands, Norwegens oder Liechtensteins sein und die bürgerlichen Ehrenrechte besitzen.

Die vollständigen Bedingungen, Stellenbeschreibungen und das notwendige Bewerbungsformular sind von der EMEA-Websitehttp://www.emea.europa.eu/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htmherunterzuladen. Das ordnungsgemäß mit Datum und Unterschrift versehene Bewerbungsformular muss zusammen mit allen zweckdienlichen Unterlagen spätestens bis zum 1. Dezember 2006 (maßgeblich ist das Datum des Poststempels) an folgende Anschrift zurückgesandt werden:EMEA — Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London E14 4HB, United Kingdom (Tel.: (+44-207) 41 88 400; Fax: (+44-207) 41 88416).

In Zukunft wird das Amtsblatt nicht mehr automatisch an die Empfänger auf den jeweiligen Adressenlisten versandt. Wenn Sie über Veröffentlichungen benachrichtigt werden möchten, tragen Sie sich bitte online unter folgender Adresse ein:http://www.emea.europa.eu/„Online Mailing Service“.

----