alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions : “ Revisions”

Meeting Documentation : We yerhaeuser Date Staff Contact In formation (Name, email, phone #) Name of Organization (Attach list of all attendees names and emails if possible) Summary of Discussion (e.g., applicability , reporting requirements, etc.) Written Comments Provided? Did they also submit to Docket? Date sent to

EPA

- CCD

8 / 3 /2010 Lisa Hanle Hanle.Lisa@epa.gov W eyerhaeuser
sar a.kendall@weyerha euser.com, shari.brown@weyerha euser.com, steve.woock@weyerha
euser.com EPA provided the g eneral background on proposed

changes related to the reporting requirements for biogenic emissions. Specifically the proposal to all the option for separate reporting of biogenic
emissions for units following Part 75 methods. Weyerhaeuser had a number of questions about the proposed changes and discussed concerns associated with the option to report biogenic emissions separately for all units using Part 75 methods. They expressed concern that EPA would be missing key data. No w ritten comments were submitted at meeting. They will provide w

ritten comments. 8/5/10
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: August 9, 2010





BY:/s/ David Driscoll


(Signature)


DAVID DRISCOLL


President and Chief Executive Officer








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.
No. 64095.

protest 59/20672 (New York).

#### Pfeil & Holing, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the record disclosed that the full amount of duty due had not been paid at the time of protest. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was denied, and the protest was dismissed *sua sponte*for lack of prosecution.
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 4/5/2023 1

A New Party’s Qualification 

for the Ballot in Texas 

Natural Law Party of Texas v. Bomer 

(James R. Nowlin, W.D. Tex. 1:00-cv-592) 

A district judge determined that it was proper for election officials to 

use statistical sampling to determine that a new political party had 

not submitted enough signatures to qualify for a general-election 

ballot. Moreover, the party waited four weeks to file its complaint 

and then another week to seek an injunction. 

Subject: Getting on the ballot. Topics: Getting on the ballot; 

laches; interlocutory appeal. 

The Natural Law Party filed a federal complaint in the Western District of 

Texas’s Austin courthouse on September 12, 2000, challenging an August 15 

rejection of the party’s inclusion on the November 7 general-election ballot.1

On September 19, the party filed a motion for a preliminary injunction.2

Judge James R. Nowlin set the case for hearing on September 28.3

 On September 29, he issued an opinion explaining his ruling from the bench on the 

previous day denying the plaintiffs immediate relief.4

 Judge Nowlin ruled that 

it was proper for election officials to use statistical sampling to determine that 

the party had not submitted a sufficient number of valid signatures to qualify 

for the ballot.5 Moreover, the plaintiffs filed their complaint four weeks after 

their notice of ballot disqualification and did not seek immediate relief until a 

week after that.6

On October 6, the court of appeals denied the plaintiffs an injunction 

pending appeal.7 Two weeks later, Judge Nowlin granted the defendants’ unopposed motion to dismiss the case.8

1. Docket Sheet, Natural Law Party of Tex. v. Bomer, No. 1:00-cv-592 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 12, 

2000) (D.E. 1); Opinion at 1, 3, id. (Sept. 29, 2000), D.E. 15. 

2. Docket Sheet, supra note 1 (D.E. 4); Opinion, supra note 1, at 1, 3. 

3. Order, Natural Law Party of Tex., No. 1:00-cv-592 (W.D. Tex. Sept. 20, 2000), D.E. 6. 

4. Opinion, supra note 1. 

5. Id. at 2–3. 

6. Id. at 3–4. 

7. Order, Natural Law Party of Tex. v. Bomer, No. 00-50972 (5th Cir. Oct. 6, 2000), filed 

as Order, Natural Law Party of Tex., No. 1:00-cv-592 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2000), D.E. 19. 

On October 25, 2000, the court of appeals dismissed the appeal for lack of prosecution. 

Order, id. (Oct. 25, 2000), filed as Order, Natural Law Party of Tex., No. 1:00-cv-592 (W.D. 

Tex. Oct. 30, 2000), D.E. 21. 

8. Order, Natural Law Party of Tex., No. 1:00-cv-592 (W.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2000), D.E. 20.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0914

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM166AD

737-53A1301 --- 9/3/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 20

- 00442

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF J.A. , Y.A., A.A., Children

From the 131st Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI01637

Honorable Monique Diaz , Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 19, 2021

DIS MISSED

Appellant Wesam S. Aziz filed a motion to dismiss, stating the matter in controversy has

become moot as a result of the tr i al court’s ruling perm itting a nunc pro tunc order to resolve the

issue for which appellant sought an appeal

. Appellee Nissreen T. Aziz has not opposed the motion.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.3(a). Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 42.1(a )(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against appellant

.

PER CURIAM
# I Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: jesserinford

. <jesserinford@gmail.com> Wednesday, November 20, 2013 6:09PM EAS (OST) support for mokulele airlines - kalaupapa contract DearDepartment ofTransportation (DOT), I am writing to supportMokulele Airline's 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua and Hoolehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, frequent flights, multiple islands and ease ofbookingvia GlobalDistribution System (Expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline, etc.). Itis importantwe have safe, stable & affordable service to Kalaupapa. Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years. thanks, Jessie Ford

1
Validation of Air Enforcement Data Reported to 

EPA by Pennsylvania

APPENDIX D 

DISTRIBUTION

Headquarters

Office of Inspector General - Headquarters (2410) 

Agency Audit Followup Coordinator (3304) 

Agency Audit Followup Official (3101) 

Assistant Administrator for Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (2201A) 

Assistant Administrator for Air & Radiation (6101) 

Associate Administrator for Congressional & Legislative Affairs (1301) 

Associate Administrator for Communications, Education & Public Affairs (1701) 

Associate Administrator for Regional Operations & State/Local Relations (1501) 

EPA Library (3404) 

EPA Region 3

Regional Administrator (3RA00) 

Director, Air, Radiation & Toxics Division (3AT00) 

Director, Office of External Affairs (3EA00) 

Chief, Grants & Audit Management Branch (3PM70) 

Regional Library (3PM52) 

Other

Secretary, Department of Environmental Protection Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 

Chair, Citizens Advisory Council to the Department of Environmental Resources 

Vice-Chair, Citizens Advisory Council to the Department of Environmental Resources 

Office of Inspector General -- Divisional Offices 
General Accounting Office 

Go To:

Table of Contents
| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      NFC. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      December 21, 2009 |   | /s/   | DAVID J. JOHANNESON              |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------|----------------------------------|
|                         |   |            | David      J. Johanneson         |
|                         |   |            | Principal      Executive Officer |

| Date:      December 21, 2009 |   | /s/   | WILLIAM V. MCMENAMIN             |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------|----------------------------------|
|                         |   |            | William      V. McMenamin        |
|                         |   |            | Principal      Financial Officer |

| Date:      December 21, 2009 |   | /s/   | DAVID L. DERFELT                  |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------|-----------------------------------|
|                         |   |            | David      L. Derfelt             |
|                         |   |            | Principal      Accounting Officer |

----
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0472

SAT Date: 6/7/2013

Print Date: 7/2/2013

Related cases: : Yes

Health related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: SENS-S,L; MUTA; ONCO; DEVEL; MALE REPRO; LIVER; 

KIDNEY; REPRO; BLOOD; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: -13-0472

FATE: 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = -0.31 (E) 

S > 10 g/L at 25 C (E)

VP = 0.22 torr at 25 C (NOMO5)

BP = 215 C (NOMO5) based on 66 C @ 2.7 mm Hg (M)

H = 1.93E-7 (E)

log Koc = 1.0 (E)

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)
log Fish BAF = -0.036 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 0

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = low

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = rapid

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorbed all routes (analog); expect oxidation of the 

vinyl ether with spontaneous rearrangement and release of acetaldehyde. Concern for skin and 

lung sensitization, mutagenicity, oncogenicity, developmental toxicity, male reproductive, liver, 

and kidney toxicity based on the epoxide moiety. Concern for oncogenicity, reproductive 

toxicity, and blood toxicity based on vinyl ethers 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 8.9

daphnid 48-h LC50 >100

green algal 96-h EC50 >100

fish _ chronic value 1.0

daphnid _ chronic 

value

>10

algal _ chronic 

value

>10

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for vinyl ethers and 

monoepoxides; SAR chemical class = vinyl ether, monoepoxide; MW 144; log Kow = -0.31 

(EPI); liquid with mp unknown (P); S = 501 g/L at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations 

based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as 

CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

100

SARs vinyl ethers and monoepoxides

SAR Class vinyl ether, monoepoxide

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 
 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tongli Pharmaceuticals
(USA), Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,
2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), Li Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 15, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Li LiName:
      Li LiTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer(principal
      accounting officer)
No. 59516.

protests 194060-K, etc. (New York).

#### International Packers Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Darrel L. Smith,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-0702 MCE PAN P

vs. Order

King, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoDefendant King requests leave to examine M. Baker, a

prisoner in custody of the California Department of Corrections. 

Defendant asserts M. Baker is a witness in this action and

therefore his deposition is consistent with the principles stated

in Rule 26(b)(2). See Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2). Accordingly,

defendant King’s July 14, 2005, request is granted.

So ordered.

Dated: August 9, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00702-MCE -EFB Document 63 Filed 08/09/05 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**ESSEX
      PORTFOLIO, L.P.**





CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with this quarterly report of Essex
      Portfolio, L.P. on
      Form
      10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 (the "Report"), I, Michael T. Dance,
      Principal Financial Officer **** of
      Essex
      Property Trust, Inc., the general partner of the registrant Essex Portfolio,
      L.P., hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18,
      Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
      knowledge:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates
      and for the periods indicated.











Date:
      August 9, 2005    /s/
      Michael T.
      Dance


Michael
      T. Dance


Executive
      Vice President,


Chief
      Financial Officer


Essex
      Property Trust, Inc., general partner of


Essex
      Portfolio, L.P.
No. 76-5184.

#### Baylor *v.*United States.

Ct. App. D. C. Certiorari denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-1311

MARYANN BULLARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (2:05-cv-00269-HCM)

Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 8, 2006

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

MaryAnn Bullard, Appellant Pro Se. Linda Sue Laibstain, WILLIAMS,

MULLEN, HOFHEIMER & NUSBAUM, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia; David Richard

Kresser, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

MaryAnn Bullard appeals the district court’s dismissal of

her complaint alleging employment discrimination, retaliatory

discharge, sexual harassment and disparate treatment under Title

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C.

§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Bullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North

Am., No. 2:05-cv-00269-HCM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, AND
THE SUMMARY OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CONTAINED IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q TO WHICH THIS EXHIBIT IS ATTACHED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL SCHEDULES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                              0
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 235,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                   16,100
<INVENTORY>                                   200,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              450,400
<PP&E>                                      4,075,100
<DEPRECIATION>                              2,734,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,333,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         657,800
<BONDS>                                       262,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                    239,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,333,100
<SALES>                                     2,464,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            2,467,500
<CGS>                                       2,287,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,289,900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             40,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                88,500
<INCOME-TAX>                                   33,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            54,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                   54,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0


</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 7 A0 26 9 . TOMMY LEE BELL v . THE STATE.

In 1 99 9
, To m

m y L ee Bel l was co n v i ct ed o f m u rd er an d o t h er cri m es , an d t h e Su p r e m e Co u rt affi rm ed h i s co n v i ct i o n s on ap p eal

. B el l v. S t a te , 2 7 8 Ga. 6 9 (5 9 7
SE2 d 3 5 0 ) (2 0 04 ). In 20 1 6
, Bel l fi l ed an ex t rao rd i n ary m o ti o n fo r n ew t ri al
, wh i ch

t h e t r i a l co u rt d en i ed

. Bel l n o w ap p eal s d i rect l y t o t h i s Co u rt

. W e, h o w ev er, l a c k ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Un d er o u r Co ns t it u t i o n , t h e Su p rem e Co u rt h as ap p el l at e ju ri s d i c t i o n o v er

“ [a] l l cas es i n w h ich a s en t en ce o f d eat h was i m p o s ed o r co ul d b e i m

p o s ed .” Ga.
Co n s t

. o f 1 9 8 3, Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (8 ). Becau s e a p en al t y of d eat h can b e i m p o s ed fo r t h e cri m e o f m urd er, ju ri s d ict i o n i s pro p er i n t h e S u p r e m e Co u rt

. See
OCGA § 1 6 -5 -1 (a), (e) (1 ); Nea l v. S t a te , 29 0 Ga. 5 6 3
, 5 7 2 (7 2 2 SE2 d 7 6 5 ) (2 0 1 2 ) (Hu ns t ei n , C. J ., co n cu rri n g ); s ee al s o S t a t e v. Th o r n to n , 2 5 3 G a. 5 2 4
, 5 2 4 (1 ) (3 2 2
SE2 d 71 1 ) (1 9 84 ) (d irect i n g t h i s Co u rt t o t ran s fer “ al l cas es i n w h i ch ei t h er a

s en t en ce o f d eat h o r of l i fe i m p ri s o n m en t h as b een i m

p o s ed u po n co n v ict i o n o f

m u rd er”). Acco rd i n g l y , Bel l ’ s a p p eal is h ereb y TRANSFERRED t o th e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s po s it i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e is a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t
h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 10/03/2016 October 03, 2016
### Computed roughness coefficients for Skunk Creek above Interstate 17, Maricopa County, Arizona

By: Christie M. O'DayJeff V. Phillips

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/wri994248

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report** 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

#### Study Area

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.