alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

January 12, 1944

No. 49129.

#### Protests 57572-K, etc., of Gruyere Cheese Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the cases were called for trial the plaintiffs submitted them without any evidence in support of the claims made. The record failed to disclose any error in the action of the collector. The protests were therefore overruled.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of International AluminumCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending June 30,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Cornelius C. Vanderstar, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   September 19,  2003 | /s/   CORNELIUS C. VANDERSTAR            |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                                            | Cornelius C. Vanderstar                            |
|                                            | Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 60029.

#### DuCaire Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 249553-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “B” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 51898), for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE : CIVIL ACTION

INSURANCE CO. et al., : NO. 05-5368

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

ARNOLD LINCOW et al., :

:

Defendants. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2009, it is hereby

ORDERED that there will be a final pretrial conference on

Thursday, February 19, 2009, at 3:00 P.M., in Chambers, Room

11614, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Eduardo C. Robreno 

 EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136235 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136235 

 COA: 271764 

Macomb CC: 2005-000694-AR 

39th District Court: 04-242199 

EDWARD STROSS,

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 21, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE the judgment of the Court of Appeals. 

Defendant received a variance to paint an oversized sign from the local Zoning Board of 

Appeals, under specified conditions, on July 15, 1997. In 2005, a jury convicted 

defendant under a local ordinance for violating these conditions. The Court of Appeals 

concluded that the condition prohibiting “lettering” was “an unconstitutional regulation 

of speech, infringing on defendant’s First Amendment protections,” and reversed the 

conviction. 

The Court of Appeals erroneously reached this conclusion, in our judgment. At 

the time defendant’s variance was granted, then-current MCL 125.585(11) required a 

party to challenge the constitutionality of the variance within 21 days. Defendant’s 

painting the word “LOVE” on the sign clearly violated the “lettering” condition of the 

variance. Because this statute prescribed the relevant procedure for challenging the 

constitutionality of the conditions, defendant was obligated to challenge these conditions 

in accordance with this procedure. His failure to do so precludes him from raising his 

constitutional challenge eight years later. See Finlayson v West Bloomfield Township, 

320 Mich 350, 357-358 (1948) (requiring a claim to be filed within the time period 

specified by statute); City of Troy v Aslanian, 170 Mich App 523, 530 (1988) (“A party 

who has accepted and retained the advantages of a variance granted on condition is 

estopped to attack the propriety of the condition.”). Because the Court of Appeals did not 
 _________________________________________ 

 

 

2 

address the remainder of defendant’s issues on appeal, we REMAND to the Court of 

Appeals to consider defendant’s remaining arguments. 

CAVANAGH AND KELLY, JJ., would deny leave to appeal. 

p0903 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2008 

 Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, Charles M. Kluck,
the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Amstar Financial Services, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


/s/ Charles M. Kluck
------------------------
Charles M. Kluck

February 22, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Registrant and will be retained by
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         79,770,013
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3,289,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               88,352,768
<PP&E>                                         40,649,960
<DEPRECIATION>                                 26,391,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 102,611,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          87,007,496
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     15,603,535
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   102,611,031
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               168,874,187
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               16,417,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,676,492
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                150,779,832
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            150,779,832
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   150,779,832
<EPS-BASIC>                                    87.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 01-10404

Summary Calendar

DIANE MANNEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

MARITZ TRAVEL COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Northern District of Texas

(3:00-CV-28-H)

November 20, 2001

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Diane Manney (“Manney”) sued her former employer, Maritz

Travel Company (“Maritz”), alleging a violation of the Age

Discrimination and Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq. Maritz

answered that Manney’s position had been eliminated in November

1998 as part of a reduction in force and change of focus for the
2

company business. Maritz moved for summary judgment based on

Manney’s failure to adduce sufficient evidence of pretext. The

district court carefully considered the pleadings, the summary

judgment motion, and the summary judgment evidence and concluded in

oral findings dated February 23, 2001, that there was not

sufficient evidence upon which a reasonable jury could find that

the non-discriminatory reason offered by Maritz for Manney’s

termination was a pretext for age discrimination. The district

court granted summary judgment in favor of Maritz and Manney

appeals to this Court.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts, and relevant portions of the record itself. For

the reasons stated by the district court in its oral findings dated

February 23, 2001, the decision of the district court to grant

summary judgment in favor of Maritz will be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
February 24 , 2014

President Barack Obama
The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest Washington DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

As leading medical and public health organizations, we write you to urge you to direct the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to adopt the Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Standards no later than February 28 , 2014 . These stronger public health protections will significantly reduce toxic air pollution from the U.S. passenger vehicle fleet, and are urgently needed. Nearly 150 million Americans still live in areas where the air is too dangerous to breathe. Cleaner gasoline will benefit their health immediately.

Passenger vehicles remain one of the major sources of volatile org anic compounds and nitrogen oxide emissions that react in the atmosphere to form ozone, which triggers asthma attacks, worsens lung disease and shortens life. Cars, light trucks and SUVs also contribute to ambient fine particulate matter
which threatens he art and lung health, as well as increased risk of premature death. Emerging health research indicates that people who live or work near roadways suffer disproportionate adverse health effects from air pollution.

Not only does the nation need these reduc tions in ozone and particulate matter to protect public health, lower sulfur gasoline and vehicle emissions standards are one of the most cost

- effective paths to cleaner

air. The National Association of Clean Air Agencies estimates that by lowering the sulfur content in gasoline , the nation could immediately reduce the amount of air pollution equal to removing 33 million cars and light trucks from our roads. Reducing the sulfur in gasoline will build on the strong foundation
of your efforts to increase f uel efficiency and cut carbon pollution in half by 2025

. Americans have the right to breathe clean and healthy air. In our work to improve the health of our patients and the public, we know first

- hand that the air too many Americans breathe puts their h ealthand their lives at risk. The new standards will protect the health of all, especially those who are most

vulnerable: our children; the elderly; those with chronic lung disease, heart disease or diabetes; and those who have low incomes. We urge you t o direct EPA to adopt the Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emissions
and Fuel Standards by February 28, 2014.

Sincerely,

American Academy of Pediatrics

American Heart Association American Lung Association
American Public Health Association American Thoracic Society Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America
Health Care Without Harm National Association of County and City H ealth
Officials
Trust for America’s Health

cc: Gina McCarthy, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Michael Boots

, Acting Chair, Council on Environmental Quality
Dan Utech

, Special Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change
Janet McCabe

, Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation, US EPA Chris Grundler, Director, Office of Transpo rtation and Air Quality, US EPA Howard Shelanski, Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB
Part 1

Supplement

Fiscal Year 2015 Reporting

Section V

T/L S2 15-01 Draft SBR V-1 IRC Handout May 7, 2015

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Debit/Credit Begin/End Auth Type Code Fed/NonFed TAS Status Fund Type Addl. Info.

1020

1020 411500 Loan Subsidy Appropriation D/C E D/P U/E EG/EP/ER

1020 411700 Loan Administrative Expense Appropriation D/C E D/P U/E EG/EP/ER

1020 411800 Reestimated Loan Subsidy Appropriation D/C E U/E EG/EP/ER

1020 412500 Loan Modification Adjustment Transfer Appropriation D/C E U/E EG/EP/ER

1020 438200 Temporary Reduction - New Budget Authority D/C E S U/E EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR

1020 438700

Temporary Reduction of Appropriation From Unavailable 

Receipts, New Budget Authority D/C E D/P U/E ES/ET

1020 438800

Temporary Reduction of Appropriation From Unavailable 

Receipts, Prior-Year Balances D/C E P U/E ES/ET

1020 439600

Special and Trust Fund Refunds and Recoveries Temporarily 

Unavailable - Receipts Unavailable for Obligation Upon 

Collection D/C E U EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET

1290

1290 411500 Loan Subsidy Appropriation D/C E D/P U EG/EP/ER

1290 411700 Loan Administrative Expense Appropriation D/C E D/P U EG/EP/ER

1290 411800 Reestimated Loan Subsidy Appropriation D/C E U EG/EP/ER

1290 412500 Loan Modification Adjustment Transfer Appropriation D/C E U EG/EP/ER

1290 438700

Temporary Reduction of Appropriation From Unavailable 

Receipts, New Budget Authority D/C E P U ES/ET

1290 438800

Temporary Reduction of Appropriation From Unavailable 

Receipts, Prior-Year Balances D/C E P U ES/ET

1490

1490 414200

Actual Repayment of Borrowing Authority Converted to 

Cash D/C E U EG/EP/ER/ET/TR

1890

1890 438200 Temporary Reduction - New Budget Authority D/C E S U EG/EP/ER/ES/TR

USSGL Crosswalk - Statement of Budgetary Resources

Budgetary resources:

Adjustment to unobligated balance brought forward, Oct 1 (+ or -) (Note 

28)

Appropriations (discretionary and mandatory)

Borrowing authority (discretionary and mandatory)

Spending authority from offsetting collections (discretionary and 

mandatory)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>  
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-13-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      18,690,039
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              19,680,425
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,764
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (312,617)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                19,680,425
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               303,869
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,748
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (312,617)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (312,617)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (312,617)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.015)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.015)
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Current industrial reports.MA34K, Steel shipping drums and pails**
 
1992 | 1993 | 1994| 1995 | 1996 | 1997
 
SuDoc Number:C 3.158/42:
Item Number:0142-A-54 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000507032
 
February 11, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 ROBINSON, et al. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al. 

DATE: June 11, 2010 CASE NO. 2:04-cv-00734-RRB-KJM 

THE HONORABLE RALPH R. BEISTLINE

PROCEEDINGS: MINUTE ORDER FROM CHAMBERS

RE MOTION PRACTICE

Parties shall file motions without obtaining a hearing date.

Oppositions to motions shall be filed within 14 days from service

and replies within 7 days from service. Motions filed under

Federal Civil Rule 12(b) and (c) and Rule 56 have response times

for oppositions of 21 days from service and replies of 14 days from

service.

Motions will be ruled on based on the filings. However, if a

hearing is desired by any party, a request for oral argument shall

be filed. If it is determined that oral argument is necessary, a

hearing will be scheduled and notice given to parties. Hearings

will be held and recorded in Anchorage, Alaska, with parties and

counsel attending telephonically.

Case 2:04-cv-00734-MCE -CMK Document 77 Filed 06/11/10 Page 1 of 1
No. 63074.

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

protest 239926-K (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fresh or frozen boneless pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 59714, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Darrel L. Smith,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-0702 MCE PAN P

vs. Order

King, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a prisoner, without counsel, prosecuting this

civil rights action on the claim defendant King was deliberately

indifferent to his safety by releasing confidential information

about plaintiff’s enemies. Plaintiff moves to compel discovery

of another inmate’s medical records.

A party may move for an order compelling discovery with

respect to objections or other failure to respond to

interrogatories or requests to produce documents. Fed. R. Civ.

P. 37(a)(2)(B), 33(b)(5), 34(b). 

Case 2:04-cv-00702-MCE -EFB Document 53 Filed 07/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff makes no showing he served defendant with either

interrogatories or a request to produce documents and that

defendant either objected or failed to respond.

Accordingly, plaintiff’s October 25, 2004, motion is denied.

So ordered.

Dated: July 12, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00702-MCE -EFB Document 53 Filed 07/13/05 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10704)

#### Authentic Furniture Products, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 7215.

(Decided April 1, 1964)

*Stein & Shostalc*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, manufactured by Otsubo Kogyo, Hida Sangyo, or by Kashiwa Mokko Ltd., consists of chairs and other wood furniture, *485and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value •or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to ■all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the .appraised unit values, net packed.

> 2. That all the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement was ■entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

> 3. That the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 4. That the merchandise and issues involved herein are the same in all material respects to those in *Authentic Furniture Products*v. *United States,*Reappt. No. R61/23233, etc., 51 Cust. Ct. 438, Reap, Dec. 10614, Advance Treasury Decisions, Vol. 98, No. 45, page 113, and that the record in said case may be incorporated with the record herein.

> 5. That the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule •of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is •defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question and that such value was the appraised unit value, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.