### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA
- 2012
- 0221 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2010
- SW
- 082
- AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. Yes 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.
Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA
- IR
- M
- 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following: service info If other, explain : Commenter(s): 

### Kevin Lorrigan, Saudi Aramco What change to the AD action is requested? 

### Update service information to latest Amendment Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

### clarification Do we agree? No If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because The later Service amendment does not affect the requirements of the AD. The only change was to tell operators to contact t he manufacturer if the "di screpancy was not encountered."
**ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following: other

If other, explain : 

### AD is in response to an EASA MCAI . EASA issued a revision to their AD. Commenter(s): 

### Kevin Lorrigan , Saudi Aramco What change to the AD action is requested? 

### Commenter requests that we update our AD to show the latest EASA revision. Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

### Clarification Do we agree? No

### Page 2 of 3

If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with becau se Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because EASA revised 2010
- 0237 to allow installation of a seachlight with a higher revision number than required by its AD, provided that the STC holder has certified the installation. The FAA AD did not mandate particular seachlight revision levels.

**ISSUE 3**  **:** Select one of the following : Other If other, explain : Commenter requests that the AD state compliance with the Helicopter ASB satisfies the intent of the AD. Commenter(s): Kevin Lorrigan, Saudi Aramco What change to the AD action is requested? Commenter requests that the AD state compliance with the Helicopter ASB satisfies the intent of the AD. Why is the change requested or how is it justified? AMOC Do we agree? No If **YES** , we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **P ARTIALLY AGREE**  , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don't agree because The searc hlight may be installed on other helicopter types. The Agusta Service Information does not add su b stative information covered in the state d service information. **For additional issues, double -**  **click here** 

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.:

**ASE** Printed Name **:** James A. Grigg **Date**

**Branch Manager Date**