alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

GREGORY ESKRIDGE,

Plaintiff,

v.

A. CORREA, et al.,

Defendants.

2:04-cv-0865 LKK GGH P

ORDER

The Court having considered Defendants’ request for an nunc pro tunc extension of

time to file an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to compel production of documents, and good

cause having been found:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendants shall be granted a nunc pro tunc extension

of time for the filing of their opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to compel. Defendants’ opposition

filed June 30, 2006, is deemed timely filed. 

Dated: 7/17/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

__________________________________

The Honorable Gregory G. Hollows

esk865.eot(com)

Case 2:04-cv-00865-LKK -GGH Document 60 Filed 07/17/06 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v WOODROW NIX, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant

21 USCMA 76, 44 CMR 130

No. 24,532

October 22, 1971

*77
      *Colonel George J. McCartin, Jr., Captain Albert J. Mainelli, Jr.,*and *Captain Norman L. Blumenfeld*were on the pleadings for Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel David T. Bryant, Lieutenant Colonel Ronald M. Holdaway,*and *Captain Steven Mallis*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Chief Judge:

If an accused indicates after a court is called to order that he desires a military judge alone to try him, the court-martial must be recessed and the request executed in writing. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

In this case, however, the written request followed the testimony of one witness. This procedure does not comply with the holding in *Dean,*supra, since acceptance of the written request is a jurisdictional prerequisite. Under *Dean*we do not test for prejudice.

Accordingly, the decision of the Court of Military Review is reversed and the findings and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Army. Another trial may be ordered.

Senior Judge Ferguson concurs.

Quinn, Judge

(dissenting) :

I would affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review. See my dissent in United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 1 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 2 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 3 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 4 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 5 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 6 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 7 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 8 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 9 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 10 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 11 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 12 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 13 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 14 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 15 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 16 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 17 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 18 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 19 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 20 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 21 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 22 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 23 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 24 of 25
Case 2:05-cr-00576-JS Document 301 Filed 08/26/08 Page 25 of 25
#### Tyrone G. MIGUEL, Claimant-Appellant, v. Hershel W. GOBER, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 00-7145.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Dec. 18, 2000.

ORDER

Appellant having filed the required brief, it is

ORDERED that the order of dismissal and the mandate be, and the same hereby are, VACATED and RECALLED, and the notice of appeal is REINSTATED.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Abgenix, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

May 10, 2004

 

 
|   |  /s/ BARBARA RICHING                    |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Barbara Riching                              |
|   | Senior Director, Finance                     |
|   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required bySection 906 has been provided to Abgenix, Inc. and will be retainedby Abgenix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

1

----
No. 61318.

protests 288435-K, 286906-K, and 296260-K (New York).

#### Herman H. Sticht Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawbence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber*& *Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
Donald C. Gadbury, Director, National TRU Prograni

Carlsbad Field Office oPFiee Or Departmetit of Energy AiRANORAOiAnoN

P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad: NM 88221

Dear Mr. Gadbury:

We received your letter dated July 10, 2007, requesting the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertifieation letter the Carlsbad Field Office (C13F0) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). 'I'his request is in accordance with the CBFO procedures that are intended to ensure that the Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site certifications correlate appropriately with EPA approvals for waste cbaracterization activities at DOE transuranic (TRU) waste generator sites.

In May 2006, EPA performed a baseline inspection of LANL CCP's TRU waste charaeterization program (EPA-LANL-CCP-06.05-08) for compliance with EPA reguiations as required by the 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571-42583). On June 21, 2007, EPA issued a final inspection report and a letter approving several aspects of the LANL CCP waste characterization program (BPA Air poeket No. A-98-49, Item II-A4-88).

Upon review of the draft recertification letter for LANL CCP, EPA determines that itappropriately authorizes characterization and certification of TRU contact-handled, retrievablystored solids (S3000), and contaet-handled, retrievably-stored debris (S5000) and Off Site Recovery Program (OSRP) sources packaged as newly generated debris (S5000) waste at LANL CCP. The EPA limitations concerning the TRU waste eharacterization program for CH retrievably-stored and newly-generated wastes contained in EPA's June 21, 2007, approval letter remain applieable and are appropriately included in Attachment 4 of your site recertification. We concur that the waste characterization equipment, procedures and waste streams encompassed in your draft recertification letter for LANL CCP agree with EPA's existing approvals at the site.

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification letter for LANL CCP. Ifyou have any questions or eoncerns, please contact Ed Felteorn (202-343- 9422).

Sincerely,



# ~~ ~ Tom Peake, Acting Director Center for Federal Regulations

iniemet Address (UftL) > hflp://www.eaa.gov 8ecyeled/Recyelable , Printetl wHh Vegetzbie Oii Sased Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)

### cc: Lloyd Piper, CBFO

Vernon Daub, CBFO Casey Gadbury, CBFO Courtland Fesmire, CBFO Norma Castaneda, CBFO Martin Navarrete, CBFO Dennis Miebls, CBFO Allison Pangle, CTAC Wayne T,edford, CTAC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARIUS GAINES, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0018 FCD GGH P

vs.

DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 / AD TESTIFICANDUM

Darius Gaines, inmate CDC# P-64072, a necessary and material witness in

proceedings in this case on July 25, 2005, is confined in California Substance Abuse Treatment

Facility and State Prison, 900 Quebec Avenue, PO Box 7100, Corcoran, California 93212, in the

custody of the Warden Derral Adams; in order to secure this inmate’s attendance it is necessary

that a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the

inmate in Court, 8th Floor, Courtroom 24, United States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento,

California on July 25, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to testify in United States District

Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of court proceedings or

as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution; 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this

inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order and

writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum on the Out-To-Court Desk, California State Prison -

Sacramento, P.O. Box 290007, Represa, California 95671.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden Derrel Adams, California State Abuse Treatment Facility and State Prison,

900 Quebec Avenue, PO Box 7100, Corcoran, California 93212:

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before the

United States District Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of

the proceedings or as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above

institution.

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody

of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

DATED: 5/17/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/gain0018.841 

Case 2:04-cv-01049-EJG-GGH Document 48 Filed 05/18/05 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RELTEC'S
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      30,400,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              134,600,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,300,000
<INVENTORY>                                107,000,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           311,500,000
<PP&E>                                     158,900,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              40,900,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             829,300,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      178,000,000
<BONDS>                                     90,100,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       600,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 521,300,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               829,300,000
<SALES>                                    240,200,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           240,200,000
<CGS>                                      171,000,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              171,000,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            55,700,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,500,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,000,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 5,900,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,100,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,100,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .06
        

</TABLE>
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS50435 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Uwe
Eberle, the President and principal executive officer of Man Investments (USA)
Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. (the “Partnership”),
certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date:  May 15,
2008




/s/
      Uwe
      Eberle
                  Uwe Eberle
                  President
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10** 
**- 1133** 

YURI J. STOYANOV ,
Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v.
RAYMOND E. MABUS, Secretary of the Navy; CHARLES BEHRLE, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of the C arderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center; GARY M. JEBSEN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 70, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center; GERALD A. SMITH, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Deputy He ad of Code 70, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center; KEVIN M. WILSON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center; JOHN C. DAVIES, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Deputy Head of Code 74; BRUCE CROCK, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 74, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center; PAUL SHANG, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 72, Carderock Division , Naval Surface Warfare Division; MATHEW CRAUN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as the Head of Code 722, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center; M. KATHLEEN FOWLER, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Administrative Officer Cod e 709, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center; DAVID CARON, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Assistant Counsel Code 39, Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warfare Center; KAREN EVANISH, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Huma n Resources Specialist ,
Defendants

– Appellees

.2 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore

. William D. Quarles, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:07

- cv
- 01764

- WDQ )

Submitted : June 17, 2010 Decided: June 24, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Yuri J. Stoyanov, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Ap pellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Yuri J. Stoyanov appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his claims against Defendants, including those
brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act o f 1964,

as amended, 42 U .S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (2006 ), the Age
Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.C.

§§ 621 to 634 (200 6 ), and the Whi s tleblower Protection Act, 5

U.S.C. §§ 1214, 1221 and 2302 (200 6 ). We have reviewed the

rec ord and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order. See Stoyanov v. Mabus , No. 1:07

- cv
01764

- WDQ (D. Md. Dec. 9, 2009). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in t he materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 13, 2016

No. 04-16-00382-CV

Anthony C. AGUILAR and Michael A. Aguilar,

Appellants

v.

Margaret Anne MORALES, individually and as Independent Executor of the Estate of Alvilda 

M. Aguilar; William E. Leighner, and Arthur Bayern,

Appellees

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-PC-2802

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ motion for a forty-five day extension of time to file their brief is granted. We 

order the brief of appellees due December 20, 2016.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of October, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 46094

#### Protest 845343-G of P. B. Signore (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists- of chickory similar to that the subject of Abstract 35757. The claim at cents per pound under paragraph 776 and T. D. 47600 was therefore sustained.
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |
|  |  |
|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|  |  |

| CIR Main

Issues by Subject

Issues by Subsector

Release Schedule

Mfg. Profiles

Instruction Manuals                                                                                                                                                                                          |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| MA331E - Nonferrous Castings                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| * The letters PDF or symbol  indicate         a document is in the Portable Document Format         (PDF). To view file you will need the         Adobe(R) Acrobat(R) Reader which is available for free from the Adobe         web site.

                                                |
| **PDF FORMAT**

**Years available**:  2001 |  2000 |  1999 |  1998 |  1997

**TEXT FILE FOR VIEWING**

**Years available**:  1997

**WORKSHEET FILES ('WK3' Format)**

**Years available**:          2001  |  2000  |          1999  |  1998-Revised         May 2000  |          1997  |  1996 |
|  

**Historical data are available. For questions or to make a purchase, contact MCD*info*         at (301) 763-4673.**

                                                                                                                                                             |

**Census 2000 |  Subjects A to Z  |  Search |  Product Catalog  |  Data Tools |  FOIA   |  Quality |  Privacy · Policies |  Contact Us |  Home**

Last revised:   Wednesday, 13-Nov-2002 14:07:14 EST
# sec6_rsonp_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSOCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2020
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 1 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 2 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 3 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 4 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 5 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 6 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 7 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 8 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 9 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 10 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 11 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 12 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 13 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 14 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 15 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 16 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 17 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 18 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 19 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 20 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 21 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 22 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 23 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 24 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 25 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 26 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 27 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 28 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 29 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 30 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 31 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 32 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 33 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 34 of 35
Case 2:05-cv-05994-MMB Document 99 Filed 08/24/07 Page 35 of 35
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Griffon Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald J. Kramer, as Chief Executive Officer of Griffon, and Douglas J. Wetmore, as
Chief Financial Officer of Griffon, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
their knowledge:

/s/ RONALD J. KRAMERName: Ronald J. Kramer
Title:Chief Executive Officer
         (Principal Executive Officer)Date: November 17, 2010/s/ DOUGLAS J. WETMOREName: Douglas J. Wetmore
Title:Chief Financial Officer
         (Principal Financial Officer)Date: November 17, 2010


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Griffon Corporation and will be retained by Griffon Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks