alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:October16,
                2006
            
            By:*/s/
                John B. Gallagher*Name:John
                B. GallagherTitle:Co-Chief Executive OfficerDate:October16,
                2006
            
            By:*/s/
                Harry D. Shields*Name:Harry
                D. ShieldsTitle:Co-Chief Executive Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




EXHIBIT
            32.1
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00604-CV

Roy Lynn McDavid Jr.

v.

John Doe Land and Structure Owner, 5701 Cougar Drive, Apt - D, Austin, Texas 78745

On Appeal from the

261st District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-1-GN-11-003724

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

August14, 2014
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Charles M. Kluck, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Amstar Financial Services, Inc..;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
          the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 5, 2008


/s/ Charles M. Kluck
------------------------
Charles M. Kluck
Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 41 (Friday, March 2, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9521]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3672]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6684-5]


Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7167 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 02/19/2007 through 02/23/2007
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

EIS No. 20070065, Draft EIS, BLM, CA, Eastern San Diego County Resource 
Management Plan, Implementation, San Diego County, CA, Comment Period 
Ends: 05/31/2007, Contact: Erin Dreyfuss 760-337-4436.
EIS No. 20070066, Final EIS, BLM, AZ, Arizona Strip Field Office 
Resource Management Plan, which includes: Vermilion Cliffs National 
Monument, Grand-Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Parashant) BLM 
Portion, General Management Plan for the Grand Canyon-Parashant 
National Monument NPS Portion of Parashant, Implementation, AZ, Wait 
Period Ends: 04/02/2007, Contact: Diana Hawks 435-688-3266.
EIS No. 20070067, Draft EIS, SFW, PR, Vieques National Wildlife Refuge 
Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Implementation, Vieques, PR, Comment 
Period Ends: 04/30/2007, Contact: Jim Oland 410-573-4592.
EIS No. 20070068, Draft EIS, BLM, AZ, Ironwood Forest National 
Monument, Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Tucson Field 
Office, AZ, Comment Period Ends: 05/31/2007, Contact: Patrick Madigan 
520-258-7200
EIS No. 20070069, Second Final Supplement, FHW, WV, Appalachian 
Corridor H Project, Construction of a 9-mile Long Segment between the 
Termini of Parsons and Davis, Updated Information the Parsons-to-Davis 
Project, Funding and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit Issuance, Tucker 
County, WV, Wait Period Ends: 04/27/2007, Contact: Thomas J. Smith 304-
347-5928.
EIS No. 20070070, Second Draft Supplement, AFS, CA, Empire Vegetation 
Management Project, Supplemental Information to Clarify Cumulative 
Effects Analysis, Mount Hough Ranger District, Plumas National Forest, 
Plumas County, CA, Comment Period Ends: 04/16/2007, Contact: Gary Rotta 
530-283-0555.
EIS No. 20070071, Draft EIS, USA, VA, Fort Belvoir 2005 Base 
Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Recommendations and Related Army 
Actions, Implementation, Fairfax County, VA, Comment Period Ends: 05/
01/2007, Contact:
    Karen Wilson 703-602-2861.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20070044, Draft EIS, AFS, NM, Surface Management of Gas Leasing 
and Development, Proposes to Amend the Forest Plan include Standard and 
Guidelines Related to Gas Leasing and Development in the Jicarilla 
Ranger District, Carson National Forest, Rio Arriba County, NM, Comment 
Period Ends: 04/17/2007, Contact: Audrey Kuykendall 505-758-6212 
Revision of FR Notice Published 02/16/2007: Extending Comment Period 
from 04/02/2007 to 04/17/2007.

    Dated: February 27, 2007.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7-3672 Filed 3-1-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Before the Third Division,

February 19, 1952

No. 56404.

protest 171569-K (New York).

#### Vintage Wines, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Lancers Rose Wine in bottles or jugs similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 53224, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6272

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MALIK X. SHAKUR, a/k/a Willie Lamb,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (3:08-cr-00485-CMC-2; 3:11-cv-70102-CMC)

Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Malik X. Shakur, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Chastain Wicker, 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Malik X. Shakur seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for 

reconsideration of the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion and for denying 

his first motion for reconsideration. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Shakur has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 
3

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### ,; . 

### --j ^ 

## - , 

# \ (i : 

# 3 2 UeHtirttfe 

# Histpric a ffl-u-s-eu-ni

^Aooomrotwoofciffitfpat i

P . O . Bo x1S9 7 20 1 W . Gregor yAv e TeUuride , C O 8143 5 Te h 970-728-334 4 FAX ! 970-7^-675 7 2 7 Augus t 201 0 Departmen t ofTransportatio n I n tiie Matte ro fGran t Application s Smal l Communl yAi rSeMc e Developmen t Progra m Under49US.C . 417«etseq . Docke t DOT-OST-2010-012 4 T o Who m I t Ma yConcern : I a m vwTlin g i n support o fth e Tellurid e Airport Authorit yreques t fo ra Sma l Communit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m gran t awar d fro m th e Departmen t o fTransportation . TellurkJe' s econom yi s primaril ytouris m base d an d a s suc h convenien t airacces s i s critical . Th e reductio n I n Tetlurid e Airpor t servic e ha s ^e^'i Ksjgnlican t ove r(h e pas t severa l year ? resutth g i n a signirican t increas e h fiares . A s a loca l residen t I ca n tel l yo u I ha\Aresorte d t o drivin g grea t dis tance s t o us e othe rairports . Increase d fare s ha/ e als o discourage d visitor s fro m comin g a t all . Ou r community' s acces s t o a n ai rservic e gran t awar d wil l g M Tellurid e a competitiv e chanc e t o increas e airsennce , reduce airfare s an d recove rai rsea t capacit ylos t ove rth e las t coupl e o fyears . Tellurid e Regiona l Airport i s th e highes t altitud e commercia l aiipor t i n th e Unite d States . Thi s pre sent s additiona l challenge s t o attractin g ne wai rservic e an d require s mor e fundin g h orde rt o d o so . Start-u p fundin g support vi a th e Small Commmlt yAi rServic e Gran t progra m woul d g o alon g wa yt o hel p th e Tellurid e Airport achiev e it s goals . Than k yo u i n advanc e fo ryou rconskleratio n ofth e Tellurid e Airport Authorit ySmal l Communit yAi r Servic e Developmen t Progra m Gran t reques t Bes t Regards ,

Laur« i Bloemsm a Executiv e Directo r

Tellurid e Historica l Museu m Boar d o fDirector s Presiden t Vic e Presid'Sn t Treasure r Secretar y Sa n Migue l Count y Mountai n ^/illao e T^llund i Deborat i Fr-^ednL^ n F'lSul a WalciR p fiann yCraf t Vick i Eidsm o Elatn e Fische r Da n Garne r Bo b Saundijr t Director s Tod d Brow n C'lan a C'jno'jit z Pud yDaviso n Caro l Hinterrneiste r S^^a^| :?ea yMitche n •Joh n Shield s Ji m Th.ejrp Errientu s Richar d Bett i jac k Hdcriso n JohnPill^J-.iir yH I •^heil a Wai d
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHNNY PARDO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1104 LKK GGH P

vs.

RICHARD RIMMER, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 20, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01104-LKK -GGH Document 17 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2005, are adopted in full; and 

2. This action is dismissed. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED: September 15, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/pard1104.801

Case 2:04-cv-01104-LKK -GGH Document 17 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2
REGISTRATION

69592-19

Vol.3
No. 60824.

#### Ascot, Ltd., and Heinrich, Herrmann & Weiss *v.*United States,

protests 305598-K and 285289-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 24-1705

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Ricky Shawn Bennett, also known as Shawn

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central

 ____________

Submitted: June 27, 2024

Filed: July 2, 2024

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Ricky Bennett appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release

and sentenced him to a term above the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range. His

1The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.
counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the

substantive reasonableness of the sentence.

We conclude that the sentence was not an abuse of discretion. See United

States v. Valure, 835 F.3d 789, 790 (8th Cir. 2016) (observing that the district court’s

revocation sentencing decisions are reviewed for an abuse of discretion). There is no

indication that the district court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant

weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment. 

See United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (setting forth the

considerations for the substantive reasonableness of a sentence); see also United

States v. Michels, 49 F.4th 1146, 1148-49 (8th Cir. 2022) (concluding that a

revocation sentence above the Guidelines range was not an abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment.

______________________________

-2-
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

EARNEST CASSELL WOODS, II, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TOM L. CAREY, et al., 

Defendants. 

No. 2:04-cv-1225 MCE AC P 

ORDER 

 A further telephonic settlement conference was set in this case for October 14, 2015, at 

1:30 p.m., and an order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum was issued to provide for 

plaintiff’s telephonic appearance. ECF Nos. 354, 355. The court has been advised that plaintiff 

has been transferred from Wasco State Prison and is now incarcerated at the California State 

Prison-Centinela. The previous order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued to the 

Warden of Wasco State Prison (ECF No. 355) will be vacated and a new order and writ of habeas 

corpus ad testificandum directed to the Warden of California State Prison-Centinela will be 

issued. The telephonic settlement conference remains scheduled for October 14, 2015, at 1:30 

p.m. 

 The court will direct the Clerk of the Court to update plaintiff’s address on the docket to 

reflect that he is currently incarcerated at California State Prison-Centinela. 

///// 

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 356 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

2

 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

 1. The order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued September 25, 2015, and 

served on the Warden of Wasco State Prison (ECF No. 355) is hereby vacated. 

 2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to update plaintiff’s address of record to reflect that 

he is currently housed at California State Prison-Centinela, Facility A, P.O. Box 901, Imperial, 

CA 92251. 

 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to fax a courtesy copy of this order to the Litigation 

Coordinator at Wasco State Prison at (661) 758-7093 and to the Litigation Coordinator at 

California State Prison-Centinela at (760) 337-7650. 

DATED: September 25, 2015 

Case 2:04-cv-01225-MCE-AC Document 356 Filed 09/28/15 Page 2 of 2
Total users

83.2K

-3.8% from previous 29 days

Sessions

107.5K

-4.5% from previous 29 days

30-day active users

164.2K

-0.5% from previous 29 days

Feb 1, 2024 - Feb 29, 2024 ▼

FLETC All Website Data - ▼

Views Engagement rate

1. 267,332 58.48%

▼

1 - 1 / 1

< >

Pageviews and Engagement

new returning

28.3%

71.7%

New vs. Returned Visitors

google

(direct)

bing

dhs.gov

fletcprod.modolabs.n

sass.fletc.dhs.g

usajobs.gov

yahoo

duckduckgo

others

6.4%

18.7%

62.6%

Visits by Source

Average session duration Engaged sessions

1. 00:02:51 62,852

▼

1 - 1 / 1

< >

Session Details

FLETC.gov Web Performance Metrics

Page title Views

1. Training Catalog | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

48

2. Frontpage | Federal Law Enforcement Training

Centers

27

3. Training | Federal Law Enforcement Training

Centers

15

4. Glynco, Georgia | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

14

5. Execution of a Search Warrant (I) (MP3) | Federal

Law Enforcement Training Centers

13

6. Programs | Federal Law Enforcement Training

Centers

9

7. Artesia, New Mexico | Federal Law Enforcement

Training Centers

8

8. Male Physical Efficiency Battery Scores | Fede

Law Enforcement Training Centers

7

9. Physical Efficiency Battery (PEB) | Federal 

Enforcement Training Centers

7

10. Careers and Internships | Federal Law

Enforcement Training Centers

5

▼

1 - 100 / 127 < >

Top Overall Pages

Active users 30-day active users

1... 82,063 164,173

▼

1 - 1 / 1

< >

Active Users
Views

1PM

2PM

3PM

11AM

12PM

10AM

4PM

8AM

9AM

6PM

0

10

20

30

27

26 26

25

22

21

17

16 16

14

Hour

Pageviews by Hour

Device category Sessions

1. desktop 58,479

2. mobile 51,904

3. tablet 960

4. smart tv 8

▼

1 - 4 / 4

< >

Sessions by Device Category

Session source / medium Sessions

1. google / organic 69,190

2. bing / organic 7,470

3. dhs.gov / referral 2,373

4. sass.fletc.dhs.gov / referral 1,1

5. usajobs.gov / referral 1,062

6. fletc-prod.modolabs.net / ref... 1,1

7. yahoo / organic 817

8. duckduckgo / organic 872

9. usa.gov / referral 226

10. cbp.usajobs.gov / referral 357

1 - 100 / 398

<

>

Sessions and Pageviews by Source / Medium

FLETC.gov Web Performance Metrics
No. 53526.

protest 142709-K (Laredo).

#### Raymor Manufacturing Division, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.