alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 The July 12, 2005 order submitting on the papers plaintiff’s motions filed June 6, 2005 also

referred to plaintiff’s motion filed June 27, 2005. That motion, however, was previously vacated by

order filed June 29, 2005. The instant order therefore will address only the merits of the motions

filed June 6, 2005.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANNE NELSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1103 DFL KJM PS

vs.

PLACER COUNTY, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to strike defendants’ initial

disclosures, as well as plaintiff’s motion to file a second amended complaint and to supplement

plaintiff’s initial disclosure. As provided by Local Rule 78-230(h), the court submitted the

matter on the papers without oral argument.1 Upon review of the motion and the documents in

support and opposition, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AND

ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Defendants’ initial disclosures were timely. The motion to strike is denied.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01103-DFL -KJM Document 60 Filed 07/21/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty days

from the date of this order. Amendment shall be limited to correction of typographical errors as

identified in plaintiff’s motion to amend.

3. Plaintiff may supplement initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 26(e) without leave of court. 

DATED: July 19, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

nelson.mts

Case 2:04-cv-01103-DFL -KJM Document 60 Filed 07/21/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 65486.

#### Sports International, Inc., and H. B. Thomas & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/24087 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of golf caddy carts similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64052, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

May 21, 1962

No. 66774.

#### The Akron et al. *v.*United States,

protests 312467-K, etc. (Dos Angeles).

*455Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Federal Register: May 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 87)]
[Notices]               
[Page 24880]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06my10-25]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

 
Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date and Time: Friday, May 14, 2010; 11 a.m. EDT.

Place:  624 9th St., NW., Room 540, Washington, DC 20425.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public, except where noted otherwise.

I. Approval of Agenda
II. Announcements
III. Program Planning
     Approval of Briefing Report on Health Care Disparities
     Approval of Findings & Recommendations on Educational 
Effectiveness of Historically Black Colleges & Universities Briefing 
Report
     Approval of 2011 Business Meeting Calendar
     Update on Status of Title IX Project--Some of the 
discussion of this agenda item may be held in closed session.
IV. State Advisory Committee Issues
     Colorado SAC
     Ohio SAC
     South Carolina SAC
     Consideration of Additional Nominee to the New Jersey SAC
V. Staff Director's Report
VI. Adjourn

Contact Person for Further Information: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: May 4, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-10891 Filed 5-4-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
No. 54639.

#### Kornreich & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 126217-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 436), the claim at 10 nercent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
**Exhibit 21**

 

SUBSIDIARIESOF THE REGISTRANT

 

Subsidiaries of the Company and thejurisdiction in which each company was incorporated are listed below. Unlessotherwise indicated, all of the voting securities of each subsidiary are ownedby K-tel International, Inc. or one of its subsidiaries.

 

K-tel International (USA), Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

Dominion Entertainment, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

K-tel Ireland Limited

Dublin, Ireland (an Ireland Corporation)

 

K-tel Entertainment (CAN) Inc.

Winnipeg, Manitoba (a Canada corporation)

 

K-tel Marketing Limited

London, England (an England corporation)

 

K-tel Entertainment (U.K.) Ltd.

London, England (an England corporation)

 

K-tel Direct Limited

London, England (an England corporation)

 

K-tel (Australia) Pty. Limited

Southport, Queensland, Australia (an Australian corporation)

 

Seminars Direct, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

K-tel Consumer Products, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

K-tel Direct, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

K-tel TV, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

K-tel Video, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

K-tel DVD, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

K-tel Online, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

K-tel Entertainment, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

K-tel Services, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota (a Minnesota corporation)

 

Dominion VertriebsGmbH

Frankfurt, Germany (a German corporation)

 

1

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUL-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-2000
<CASH>                                         176,945
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               13,446,906
<ALLOWANCES>                                   214,360
<INVENTORY>                                 15,370,542
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,771,813
<PP&E>                                       5,330,697
<DEPRECIATION>                                 754,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,412,897
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,599,560
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        37,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,478,005
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,412,897
<SALES>                                     19,733,398
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            19,733,398
<CGS>                                       13,532,376
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,704,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (40,083)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (120,593)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,342,796
<INCOME-TAX>                                   856,678
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,486,118
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,486,118
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39


</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-18-00184-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 236th District Court

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 236-280819-15

Before Kerr, Pittman, and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

SOUTHLAKE AVIATION, LLC, Appellant

V.

SOUTHLAND PROPERTY TAX CONSULTANTS, INC., Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Southlake Aviation, LLC’s Unopposed Motion to 

Dismiss Appeal” and see no reason not to grant it. We therefore grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Appellant must pay the costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 4, 2018
No. 66801.

#### Cotra Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 60/17099 and 61/3421 (New York).

*466Opinion toy

Rao, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, identified in the record as items 3020 and 3022, and the issues axe the same as those involved in *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 02, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, July 02, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A19D0510. LORI INGRAM v. SPENCER R. MOORE, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF DRIVER SERVICES et al. .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 19CV0477
No. 50420.

#### Protests 114133-K/152, etc., of American Express Co. et al. (Chicago, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 64844.

#### Lindsley Import & Export Company *v.*United States,

protests 58/7600, etc. (Tampa).

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the protests enumerated in the attached schedule of protests is described on the invoices as “Music Boxes with 18 Notes” and further described as “No. 4, 7%" x *5Vz"*x 4%",” and as “No. 5, *T/s”*x 5(4" x 4%"-” It was assessed with duty at the rate of 47% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 411 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 54108, for bags in chief value of wood. The protest claim is for duty at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the said act, as modified by T.D. 52373 and T.D. 52476, for manufactures in chief value of wood, other than certain manufactures not involved here.

When the protests were called for trial, counsel for the parties stipulated in open court that—

1. Such articles are in chief value of wood.

2. Such articles are not designed and intended to be generally and commonly used as bags or handbags.

*362S. Such articles are designed and intended to be generally and commonly used as jewelry or trinket boxes, and they are generally and commonly so used.

The protests were submitted for decision upon the foregoing stipulation and a sample representative of the merchandise, which was received in evidence without objection as plaintiffs collective exhibit 1.

From an examination of the record as thus made, we are satisfied that the principles of the decisions in the cases of *Thorens, Inc.*v. *United States,*31 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 125, C.A.D. 261, and *Premier Decorations, Inc.*v. *United States,*24 Cust. Ct. 478, Abstract 54361, are applicable to the issues and facts in this case.

Following those authorities, the protest claim in each case is sustained and judgment will issue accordingly.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON, No. 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB P 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

 

D.L. RUNNELS, et al., 

 ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 Defendants. AD TESTIFICANDUM

 / 

Kenneth J. Wash, CDCR # T-68036, a necessary and material witness in a jury trial in 

this case on February 8, 2016, is confined in Folsom State Prison (FSP), in the custody of the 

Warden. In order to secure this inmate’s attendance it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus 

ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before Judge Troy L. 

Nunley at the U. S. District Court, Courtroom No. 2, 501 I Street, 15th Floor, Sacramento, 

California 95814, on Monday, February 8, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court, 

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a 

settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement 

conference or as ordered by Judge Claire. 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is 

ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden, FSP, P.O. Box 910, Represa, CA 95671: 

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge Nunley at the 

time and place above, until completion of the trial in this matter, or as ordered by the court. 

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate 

and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

DATED: December 17, 2015. 

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 296 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INCOME
STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          39,087
<SECURITIES>                                   311,097
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,898,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,249,048
<PP&E>                                          86,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                  38,499
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,499,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,837,812
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,630
<OTHER-SE>                                     388,120
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,499,855
<SALES>                                        944,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,015,138
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  742,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                96,776
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              70,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                104,867
<INCOME-TAX>                                    38,277
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             66,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    66,590
<EPS-BASIC>                                       5.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.95


</TABLE>
No. 67841.

#### Agency Tile Supply Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/21785, etc. (New York).

*339Opinion, by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of opal glass tiles or tiling, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**GAO-02-513T**                      Published: Apr 10, 2002. Publicly Released: Apr 10, 2002.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

The Department of Education has a history of financial management problems, including serious internal control weaknesses, that have affected the Department's ability to provide reliable financial information on its operations. GAO found that significant internal control weaknesses in payment processes and poor physical control over its computer assets led to fraud, improper payments, and lost assets. GAO also identified  instances of grant and loan fraud and pervasive control breakdowns and improper payments in other areas, particularly involving purchasing cards.

## Full Report

Full Report (15 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Computer equipment managementCreditComputer fraudCredit salesEducational grantsErroneous paymentsFinancial managementFraudInternal controlsComputers
No. 46096.

#### Protests 633089-G, etc., of Delgaizo Distributing Corp. et al. (Providence, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          3,112
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 115,561
<ALLOWANCES>                                   10,383
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              108,290
<PP&E>                                        597,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                376,280
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                345,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         180,652
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                    1,223,435
<OTHER-SE>                                          0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  345,606
<SALES>                                       143,727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              143,727
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 198,101
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              9,861
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (64,235)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (64,235)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (0.041)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.041)


</TABLE>