alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10716)

#### Jacky Products Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1037379, etc.

(Decided April 15, 1964)

*Broolcs £ Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*511OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, involve certain plastic baby pants, exported from Haiti and entered at the port of New York.

Stipulated facts, upon which the appeals have been submitted, establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the articles in question is constructed value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.I).' 54165), and that such statutory value therefor is 0.3964 per dozen, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MICHAEL J. WYNNE; 1ST AND 

TRINITY SUPER MAJORITY, LLC 

AND 3RD; AND CONGRESS SUPER 

MAJORITY, L.L.C.,

Appellants, 

v.

GREGORY S. MILLIGAN, IN HIS 

INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY AND AS 

RECEIVER FOR WC 1ST AND 

TRINITY L.P. AND WC 3RD AND 

CONGRESS, L.P.; THE ROY F. & 

JOANN COLE MITTE FOUNDATION; 

RAY CHESTER; STEPHEN WAYNE 

LEMMON; AND RHONDA BEAR 

MATES,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-20-00230-CV

Appeal from the

250th District Court 

of Travis County, Texas1

(TC# D-1-GN-20-003550)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Michael J. Wynne has filed an agreed notice of settlement and motion to vacate 

the trial court’s judgment and to dismiss as moot this appeal as to himself individually. The motion 

indicates it is unopposed, and we have received no objection from any other party to this motion. 

As such, we will grant the motion and render judgment vacating the trial court’s judgment as to 

1 We hear this case on transfer from the Third Court of Appeals in Austin. See TEX.R.APP.P. 41.3. 
2

Wynne individually and dismiss this appeal as to Wynne individually. See TEX.R.APP.P.

42.1(a)(2)(A).

July 30, 2021

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
Case 2:04-cv-01203-KJM-CKD Document 51 Filed 09/27/06 Page 1 of 5Case 2:04-cv-01203-KJM-CKD Document 51 Filed 09/27/06 Page 2 of 5Case 2:04-cv-01203-KJM-CKD Document 51 Filed 09/27/06 Page 3 of 5Case 2:04-cv-01203-KJM-CKD Document 51 Filed 09/27/06 Page 4 of 5Case 2:04-cv-01203-KJM-CKD Document 51 Filed 09/27/06 Page 5 of 5
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 1- 36 08

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Mau ric e Kari uk i Gi ta W aweru ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lPeti ti on er

v. Eric H. Hold er, J r., Att or ne y Gene ral of t he Uni te d S ta te s ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll lResp on de nt

__ __ __ __ __ __ Pet it io n fo r Rev ie w of a n Ord er o f th e Bo ardof I m

m ig rat io n Ap pe al s

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: May 9, 20 12 Fil ed : Oct ob er 5 , 20 12 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re BYE, COLLOTON, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu it Ju dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.
Ken y an ci ti zen Mau ric e Kari uk i Git a W aweru pe ti ti on s fo r rev ie w of an or de r of th e Bo ard of Im

m ig rat io n App eal s (BIA), whi ch affi rm ed an imm ig rat io n jud ge ’s de ni al of as y lu m , wit hh ol di ng of r em ov al , and rel ie f un de r th e Co nv en ti on Aga in st Tort ur e (CAT). Thi s co ur t la ck s juri sd ic ti on to rev ie w de te rm in at io ns reg ard in g th e un ti m el in es s of W aweru ’s as y lu m ap pl ic at io n. See 8 U.S.C. § 11 58 (a)( 3) ; Gum an ehv. Mu ka se y , 53 5 F

. 3d 78 5, 78 8 (8 th Ci r. 20 08 ). As to W aweru ’s rem ai ni ng

co nt en ti on s, we de cl in e to co ns id er arg um en ts an d ev id en ce th at were no t pr es en te d to th e BIA. See Doe v. Hol de r, 65 1 F.3 d 82 4, 83 0 (8 th Ci r. 20 11 ); Luk ows ki v. INS, 27 9 F.3 d 64 4, 64 6 (8 th Ci r. 20 02 ) (“ jud ic ia l rev ie w is li m it ed t o a d mi ni st rat iv e reco rd ”). W e co nc lu de th at su bs ta nt ia l ev id en ce su pp or ts th e de ni al s of wit hh ol di ng of rem ov al an d CAT rel ie f, an d th at W aweru ’s du e pr oc es s rig ht s were no t vi ol at ed

. Fo r th es e reas on s, we di sm is s th e pe ti ti on wit h res pe ct to th e as y lu m cl ai m an d de ny it i n a ll ot he r res pe ct s. See 8t h C ir. R . 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
(Part 2SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2020 ReportingSection IV) (Account Attribute Definition Report)

 (Bulletin No. 2020-10) (IV ADR - 1) (March 2020)
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated:May 10, 2007        /s/ Jerry D. Chase     Jerry D. Chase    Chief Executive Officer  The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not beingfiled as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
No. 50960.

#### Protest 117895-K of Stoffel & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lithographically printed calendars similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Thorens, Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 298), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 53535.

protests 137202-K, etc. (Tampa).

#### Sta-Wite, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64. C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60036.

#### Railway Express Agency et al. *v.*United States,

protests 171363-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef or veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000151 14-MAR-2019 07:52 AM
EAR

February 11, 2013 Laural yn J. Remo DOT, Office of Aviation Analy sis, Air Carrier Fitness Division, X - 56 1200 New Jersey

Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Ms. Remo: The SouthEast Alaska Regional Health Consortium (SEARHC) writes in supp ort of continuing I sl and Air E xp ress’s certificate to carry mail . SEARHC is one of the oldest nonprofit Tribal health consortiums in the nation. We provide health and wellness services for 18 communities in Southeast Alaska. Like many of our communities, Prince of Wales Island is accessed b y plane or boat. Quite often , weather hinders the delivery of mail to Klawock . Island Air Express provides reliable day /night IFR passenger service as well as transporting the Klawock mail on these dependable flights. Additionally , the company is locally- based, and provides employ ment for local people. Feel free to contact me at 907 - 463 - 4000, if you have questions. Sincerel y, Charles Clement President and CEO
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROBERTO A. OLIVAS,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-1306 DFL CMK P

vs.

DARREL ADAMS, et al., 

Respondents. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. He seeks a writ of habeas corpus

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. 

Two orders recently served on petitioner at his address of record were returned by

the postal service. Mail returned on April 22, 2005, was undeliverable because “name and

number don’t match.” The mail returned on May 18, 2005, was undeliverable because “unable

to ID/no inmate .” Because petitioner’s mail was returned just after he filed a change of address

and there has been an increasing number of instances of the CDC failing to deliver inmates’ legal

mail, the court contacted the CDC to determine petitioner’s correct address. Upon contacting the

CDC, the court discovered that petitioner was no longer in the custody of the CDC, and had been

paroled into the custody of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement (“ICE”) for possible

deportation. 

Case 2:04-cv-01306-DFL-CMK Document 14 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In his petition for federal habeas relief, petitioner did not challenge his conviction,

but instead claimed that he was held in violation of his constitutional rights because the Board of

Prison Terms failed to have counsel appear at his 2002 hearing. Petitioner also claimed that the

district attorney violated his due process rights by violating his plea agreement. The relief

petitioner sought was a new hearing. As petitioner has been paroled from the custody of the

CDC, his request for relief is now moot. 

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed as moot. 

The clerk is directed to serve this order on petitioner at the following address:

Roberto Olivas-Garay

Eloy Detention Center

A#35875710 Cell 506

4465 East Hanna Road

Eloy, AZ 85321

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: May 26, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-01306-DFL-CMK Document 14 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 55217.

#### D. Roditi & Sons, Inc., and Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 145847-K and 161353-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Poliowing the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WILLIAM A. ROMERO,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0459 MCE CMK P

vs.

D. RUNNELS, Warden, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

On May 12, 2005, petitioner submitted a “traverse.” That document was not

served on respondent. Petitioner is advised that every document submitted to the court for

consideration must be served on respondent. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5; Rule 11, Fed. R. Governing

§ 2254 Cases. Documents not to be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in

the U.S. Mail. If an attorney has filed a document with the court on behalf of respondent, then

documents submitted by petitioner must be served on that attorney and not on the respondent

himself. Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding

pro se) must include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to

respondent or his attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and

(c).

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00459-MCE-CMK Document 14 Filed 05/24/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner’s May 12, 2005

“traverse” will be placed in the court file and disregarded. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to

properly serve any documents subsequently filed in this action, and failure to include a proper

certificate of service with such filing, will result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed.

DATED: May 23, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/kf

rome0459.135 

Case 2:04-cv-00459-MCE-CMK Document 14 Filed 05/24/05 Page 2 of 2
(Reap. Dec. 10381)

Entry No. 4193, etc.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 4, 1962)

*Sharretts, Paley & darter*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. G-uilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise which is the subject of the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of phonograph records exported from Mexico after January 1, 1960.

> *468IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that phonograph records are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927— 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of' all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for reap-praisement listed in Schedule B are hereby submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the phonograph records in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the prices shown in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

PETER D. KEISLER

Assistant Attorney General

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

KRISTIN S. DOOR

Assistant United States Attorney 

501 I Street, 10th Floor

Sacramento, California 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2723

Fax: (916) 554-2900

MICHAEL F. HERTZ

PATRICIA R. DAVIS

MICHAL TINGLE

Department of Justice

Civil Division

Commercial Litigation Branch

P. O. Box 261

Benjamin Franklin Station

Washington, D.C. 20044

Telephone: (202) 307-1381 

Attorneys for the United States of America

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ) 2:04-CV-1053 GEB JFM

THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA )

ex rel. KEITH JAMES, )

) ORDER [Proposed]

Plaintiff, ) 

)

 v. ) 

) FILED UNDER SEAL

MED-MART, INC.; PACIFIC ) 

PULMONARY SERVICES, et al., )

) 

 Defendants. )

______________________________) 

 

The United States and the State of California having

declined to intervene in this action pursuant to the False

Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4)(B), and California

Government Code § 12652(c)(6)(B), the Court rules as

follows:

Case 2:04-cv-01053-GEB -JFM Document 24 Filed 03/13/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

IT IS ORDERED that

1. The complaint be unsealed and served upon the

defendant by the relator;

2. All other contents of the Court's file in this

action remain under seal and not be made public or served

upon the defendant, except for this Order and the United

States of America's and the State of California's Joint

Notice of Election to Decline Intervention, which the

relator will serve upon the defendant only after service of

the complaint;

3. The seal be lifted as to all other matters

occurring in this action after the date of this Order; 

4. The parties shall serve all pleadings and motions

filed in this action, including supporting memoranda, upon

the United States, as provided for in 31 U.S.C.

§ 3730(c)(3), and upon the States of California, as provided

for in California Government Code § 12652(f)(1). The United

States and the State of California may order any deposition

transcripts and are entitled to intervene in this action,

for good cause, at any time; 

5. All orders of this Court shall be sent to the

United States and to the State of California, and that

6. Should the relator or the defendant propose that

this action be dismissed, settled, or otherwise

discontinued, the Court will provide the United States and

the State of California with notice and an opportunity to be

//

//

Case 2:04-cv-01053-GEB -JFM Document 24 Filed 03/13/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 3 -

heard before ruling or granting its approval.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 10, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01053-GEB -JFM Document 24 Filed 03/13/06 Page 3 of 3
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0

Column1 2006-2008 2007-2009 2008-2010 2009-2011 2010-2012**E x** **p e** **c t** **e d** **E x** **c e** **e d** **a n** **c e** **s** 

# South **Coast 1**

**- hour**  **Ozo ne 2006** 

**- 2013** 

2006-2008

#REF!
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4335 

To ensure funds are available under the aviation workforce development 

grant program for technical assistance and to require consideration for 

certain applicants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 14, 2024 

Mr. PETERS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To ensure funds are available under the aviation workforce 

development grant program for technical assistance and 

to require consideration for certain applicants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AVIATION WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT 

4 GRANTS. 

5 Section 625(b) of the FAA Reauthorization Act of 

6 2018 (49 U.S.C. 40101 note) is amended by adding at 

7 the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(3) SET ASIDE FOR TECHNICAL ASSIST9 ANCE.—The Secretary may set aside up to 2 percent 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4335 IS

1 of the funds appropriated to carry out this sub2 section for each of fiscal years 2025 through 2028 

3 to provide technical assistance to eligible applicants 

4 for a grant under this subsection. 

5 ‘‘(4) CONSIDERATION FOR CERTAIN APPLI6 CANTS.—In reviewing and selecting applications for 

7 grants under the programs established under sub8 section (a), the Secretary may give consideration to 

9 applicants that provide an assurance— 

10 ‘‘(A) to use grant funds to encourage the 

11 participation of populations that are underrep12 resented in the aviation industry, including in 

13 economically disadvantaged geographic areas 

14 and rural communities; 

15 ‘‘(B) to address the workforce needs of 

16 rural and regional airports; or 

17 ‘‘(C) to strengthen aviation programs at a 

18 minority-serving institution (as described in sec19 tion 371(a) of the Higher Education Act of 

20 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1067q(a)), a public institution 

21 of higher education, or a public postsecondary 

22 vocational institution.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
600 59th Street, Room 4001, Galveston County Justice Center, Galveston, Texas 77551‐2388

Phone (409) 766‐2424 Fax (409) 766‐2292

John D. Kinard 

DISTRICT CLERK 

GALVESTON COUNTY, TEXAS 

May 22, 2015 

First Court of Appeals 

Christopher A Prine Clerk of Court 

301 Fannin, 2nd floor 

Houston, TX 77002-2066 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT ON APPEAL 

IN RE: Cause No. 14-CV-1206, Styled Jose Martinez vs. University of Texas Medical Branch- Filed in 405th District Court 

of Galveston County, Texas 

Dear Clerk: 

Please find enclosed a copy of the notice of appeal filed in the above case. This case is assigned to the 1st Court of Appeals, 

Houston, Texas. 

Please note the following information: 

Date of Appealable Order or Judgment: February 25, 2015 

Notice of Appeal: May 21, 2015 

Motion for New Trial filed: March 30, 2015

Request for Finding of Facts and Conclusions of Law filed: None 

Trial Judge: Michelle Slaughter 

Court Reporter: Cylena Korkmas

Request is hereby made that all parties immediately file any designation of material to be included in the Clerk’s record. 

Any Motions for Extension of Time to file the record on appeal must be filed directly with the Court of Appeals A copy of this 

assignment letter is being mailed to all counsel of record. Please file mark the additional copy of this letter and return the same to 

my office. 

Sincerely, 

John D. Kinard 

 District Clerk 

Galveston County, Texas 

By: /s/ Shailja Dixit, Deputy 

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/22/2015 10:27:42 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
600 59th Street, Room 4001, Galveston County Justice Center, Galveston, Texas 77551‐2388

Phone (409) 766‐2424 Fax (409) 766‐2292

Copy sent to 

Jose Martinez, Pro Se 

TDCJ-ID #1678508 

Wayne Scott Unit 

6999 Retrieve 

Angleton, TX 77515 

 

Kyle Smith 

Attorney for UTMB 

P. O. Box 12548, Capitol Station 

Austin, TX 78711 

Cylena Korkmas, Court Reporter 

Hand-Delivered