alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

ACR Activity Report

To search for Adjustment, Correction, and Rescission (ACR) transactions, complete the 

following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, click Check Processing Reports>ACR Activity Report. The ACR 

Activity Report page appears.

2. Enter the search criteria you would like to view.

• Enter the From and To ACR Settlement date range

• Select a Report Type

• Select an ACR Type

• Select an ACR Reason Code

• The maximum date range for the From and To ACR (Adjustment, Correction, and 

Rescission) Settlement range is 45 days.

• Report Type options include Credit/Debit - ACR, Credit - ACR, and 

Debit - ACR.

• Search ACR Transaction options include All ACR, Adjustment, Correction, and 

Rescission.

• ACR Reason Code options include Duplicate Transaction Processed, Non-Cash 

Item, Transaction Amount Correction, Representment, Warranty Indemnity 

Claim, Voucher Date Change, Voucher Number Change, Account Switch, 

Transaction Account Switch, and ACH Reversal.

3. Click the Yes or No radio button to Include Subordinates.

4. Click an OTC Endpoint to initiate the report. The ACR Activity Report preview page appears

as shown in Figure 1.

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1: ACR Activity Report Preview Page

5. Under Export as, 

• Select a PDF, Excel or Word

• Click Download

Or

• Click Print PDF Report

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

Additional Button
No. 50966.

#### Protest 41989-K of Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protest was sustained to this extent.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2020 ReportingSection VII  &"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2020-15	&"Arial,Bold"VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"June 2020
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-22-00191-CV

ERICA QUINN, Appellant

V.

STATE FARM LLOYDS; STATE FARM 

LLOYDS, INC.; JIM GOLDSWORTHY;

HAROLD D. BAKER AS TRUSTEE OF 

HAROLD D. AND MADONNA A.

BAKER TRUST; RANDALL TODD 

BAKER AND SHELLY ZOYLA BAKER,

CO-TRUSTEES AS TRUSTEE OF THE 

NEW COVENANT FAMILY REVOCABLE 

TRUST; RANDALL TODD BAKER;

SHELLY ZOYLA BAKER; MICHAEL 

STEVEN WEY; RANDALL HOUSTON 

HARBERT; AND CHUCK PEDROSO, 

Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 235th District 

Court

of Cooke County (CV19-00103)

June 1, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Justice 

Bassel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgments. It is ordered that the judgments of the 

trial court are affirmed. 
It is further ordered that Appellant Erica Quinn shall pay all costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel 

 Justice Dabney Bassel
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           5,941
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,341
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,430
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,230
<PP&E>                                           2,131
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  39,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           31,087
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,317
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    39,035
<SALES>                                         85,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                           47,670
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (490)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,379)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        28
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2,407)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.31)
        


</TABLE>
1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District

of Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 03-2389

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of Minnesota.

Eulogio Martinez-Arrellano, also *

known as Angel Arteaga, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: March 4, 2004

Filed: March 11, 2004 

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Eulogio Martinez-Arrellano pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute and

possess with intent to distribute in excess of 500 grams of a mixture containing

methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846. The district court1

 assessed a 2-

level role enhancement and sentenced Mr. Martinez-Arrellano to 168 months

imprisonment and 5 years supervised release.
-2-

On appeal, Mr. Martinez-Arrellano contests the role enhancement and argues

that his sentence should be vacated because of misconduct by his public defender.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not clearly

err in determining Mr. Martinez-Arrellano’s role in the offense warranted a 2-level

enhancement. See U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c) (2-level increase if defendant was organizer,

leader, manager, or supervisor in any criminal activity); United States v. Johnson,

47 F.3d 272, 277 (8th Cir. 1995) (standard of review). We also conclude that

Mr. Martinez-Arrellano’s claim regarding misconduct by his public defender is not

properly before us. See United States v. Hughes, 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir.

2003). 

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
<PAGE>


                                       March 4, 1999



Mr. Kenneth J. Wessels
Senior Executive Vice President
Dain Rauscher Incorporated
Dain Rauscher Plaza, 18C9
60 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402

  Re:  Amendment of Employment Agreement

Dear Ken:

     This is to confirm the terms under which your Employment Agreement with 
Dain Rauscher Incorporated, dated March 31, 1998, has been amended.  
Specifically, you have agreed to accept $875,000, rather than $1,125,000, as 
guaranteed total cash compensation for 1998.

     Please acknowledge your agreement to this amendment by signing in the 
space below and returning this letter to me.

                                                  Sincerely,

                                                  /s/ Irving Weiser

                                                  Irving Weiser

IW:rwh


ACKNOWLEDGED, AGREED AND ACCEPTED:



     /s/ Kenneth J. Wessels
---------------------------------
Kenneth J. Wessels
Effective:  February 26, 1999
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez
Civil Action No. 09-4710

v. : Criminal No. 05-721

JAMES A. RUSSELL,

ORDER

This matter having come before the Court on an application by James A. Russell,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, and the Court having considered the submissions of the
parties, without an evidentiary hearing, and for the reasons set forth in the Opinion of
even date,

IT IS on this 15" day of November, 2010 hereby

ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied; and it is further

ORDERED that, in light of the failure of Petitioner to demonstrate the denial of a
constitutionally protected right and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c), no certificate of
appealability shall issue.

/s/ Joseph H. Rodriguez

Hon. Joseph H. Rodriguez,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-05886-MAM Document 36 Filed 05/30/08 Page 15 of 15
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Request for Dismissal and Order O’Campo v. Hollywood Video-Paradise 

 CIV. S-04-1171 DFL CMK

LYNN HUBBARD, III, SBN 69773

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970

LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

12 WILLIAMSBURG LANE

CHICO, CA 95926

Telephone: (530) 895-3252

Fax: (530) 894-8244

Attorneys for Plaintiff

PHILLIP BONOTTO, SBN 109257

TINA BELL, SBN 186019

RUSHFORD & BONOTTO

2277 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 495

Sacramento, CA 95825

Telephone: (916) 565-0590

Facsimile: (916) 565-0599

Attorneys for Defendant

HOLLYWOOD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

dba HOLLYWOOD VIDEO-PARADISE #5968

CHARLES L. POST, SBN 160443

LIZBETH V. WEST, SBN 207137

WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK SPROUL

400 Capitol Mall, 11 Floor

th

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 558-6000

Facsimile: (916) 446-1611

Attorneys for Defendant

STANLEY C. MINASIAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIMAS O’CAMPO,

Plaintiff,

v.

HO LL YW O OD ENTERTAINMENT

CORPORATION dba HOLLYWOOD

VIDEO-PARADISE #5968; STANLEY C.

MINASIAN; and DOES 1 through 10,

Defendants.

 /

Case No. CIV. S 04-1171 DFL CMK

REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL AND

ORDER THEREON 

Case 2:04-cv-01171-DFL-CMK Document 23 Filed 08/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Request for Dismissal and Order O’Campo v. Hollywood Video-Paradise 

- 2 - CIV. S-04-1171 DFL CMK

TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES:

Pursuant to a Settlement Agreement and Release between plaintiff, Dimas

O’Campo, and defendant, Hollywood Entertainment Corporation dba Hollywood VideoParadise #5968, the parties hereby request that all parties be dismissed with prejudice

from the above-entitled action.

Dated: August 25, 2005 LAW OFFICES OF LYNN HUBBARD, III

/s/ Scott Hubbard, IV 

SCOTTLYNN J HUBBARD, IV 

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Dated: August 25, 2005 RUSHFORD & BONOTTO

Signature on File 

TINA BELL, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant Hollywood

Entertainment Corporation dba Hollywood VideoParadise #5968

Dated: August 25, 2005 WEINTRAUB GENSHLEA CHEDIAK SPROUL

Signature on File 

LIZBETH WEST, ESQ.

Attorneys for Defendant Stanley C. Minasian

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. CIV.S-04-

1171 DFL CMK, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: 8/25/2005 _/s/ David F. Levi______________________

United States District Court Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01171-DFL-CMK Document 23 Filed 08/26/05 Page 2 of 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KAI STRICKLAND WALKER

, Appellant,

v.

EDGAR WIGGINS, JR.

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 22

- 3 051

[ June 15, 2023 ]

Appeal from the C ircuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Francis Viamontes , Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE15

-

005415

.

Kai Strickland Walker, pro se, Deerfield Beach.

No brief filed for appellee

.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, M AY and G ERBER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Johnathan Conrad Fuller,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-1276 FCD PAN P

vs. Findings & Recommendations

California Department

of Corrections, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoJanuary 6, 2005, the court directed plaintiff to submit

papers necessary to serve process upon defendants. January 24,

2005, plaintiff submitted the papers and a request for a

preliminary injunction against retaliation in the form of

interference with plaintiff’s ability to comply with the court’s

January 6, 2005, order. 

Since plaintiff complied with the January 6, 2005, order,

the January 24, 2005, motion should be denied as moot.

Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l), these 

Case 2:04-cv-01276-FCD-EFB Document 20 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States

District Judge assigned to this case. Written objections may be

filed within 20 days of service of these findings and

recommendations. The document should be captioned “Objections to

Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The district

judge may accept, reject, or modify these findings and

recommendations in whole or in part.

Dated: June 7, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01276-FCD-EFB Document 20 Filed 06/08/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 49609.

#### Protests 104574-K, etc., of China Overseas, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the trays in question are of brass, copper, or pewter, not plated, used chiefly for utilitarian purposes on the table or in the household, those in chief value of brass, similar to exhibits 1 to 6 inclusive in *Strauss*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 339; those in chief value of copper (not brass), similar to exhibits 1 to 6 in said C. D. 710, were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 339 as amended by the United Kingdom Trade Agreement (T. D. 49753); and those in chief value of pewter, the same in all material respects as exhibit 8 in said C. D. 710, were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 339 as modified by the said trade agreement.
No. 51687.

#### Protests 102511-K, etc., of G. E. Carver Co. et al. (Galveston, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.,
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Horizon Medical Products, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the
Corporation, hereby certifies:

     (1)        The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)        The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Corporation.



/s/ Elaine Swygert
----------------------------------------------------
Elaine Swygert
Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer

December 2, 2003


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Horizon Medical
Products, Inc. and will be retained by Horizon Medical Products, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of IEH Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending March 29, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being, Michael Offerman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer), and Robert Knoth, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer), of the Company, respectfully
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Dated: December 11, 2013





|/s/ Michael Offerman                  | /s/ Robert Knoth              
|------------------------------------- | ------------------------------
|Michael Offerman                      | Robert Knoth                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer | Chief Financial Officer       
|(Principal Executive Officer)         | (Principal Accounting Officer)











This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not
be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation
language contained in such filing. A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



58
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Air Force 

# AGENCY:

Department of the Air Force. 

# ACTION:

Record of Decision (ROD). 

# SUMMARY:

On February 13, 2007, the United States Air Force signed the ROD for the Housing Privatization Phase II, Hickam Air Force Base, Hawaii, and Bellows Air Force Station, Hawaii. The ROD states the Air Force decision to implement Alternative B (Privatization Excluding Fort Kamehameha) that will convey and privatize 1,297 of the remaining 1,330 Government-owned military housing units on Hickam AFB and six family housing units on Bellows AFS. Privatization would exclude the 25.75 acres of land and 33 historic housing units on Fort Kamehameha. 

                        The decision was based on matters discussed in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), inputs from the public and regulatory agencies, and other relevant factors. The Final EIS was made available on December 22, 2006 in the                         **Federal Register**                         (Volume 71, Number 246, Page 77013) with a wait period ending January 22, 2007. The ROD documents only the decision of the Air Force with respect to the proposed Air Force actions analyzed in the Final EIS.                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ronnie Lanier, 15 CES/CEV, 75 H Street, Hickam AFB, Hawaii, (808) 449-1584 x238. 

Bao-Anh Trinh, 

Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-3464 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001-05-P
**AMEETINGWITH THE UNIVERSEScience Discoveries from the SpaceProgram Table of Contents 
National Aeronauticsand Space AdministrationWashington, D.C. 20546
NASA EP-177, Published 1981 
------------------------------------------------------------------ >Specialthanks to Hans-Peter Engel for scanning and formatting this book for theWeb------------------------------------------------------------------ >UpdatedOctober 22, 2004Steve Garber, NASA History WebCuratorFor further information E-mail[email protected]

**
No. 54633.

#### Estel Novelty Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 107512-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States v. Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 78, C. A. D. 401), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.