alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

I Comunicaciones

Comisión

----

CATÁLOGO COMÚN DE VARIEDADES DE ESPECIES DE PLANTAS AGRÍCOLAS

Sexto suplemento a la vigesimocuarta edición integral

(2006/C 272 A/01)

SUMARIO

Notas explicativas

Lista de especies de plantas agrícolas

I.   Remolachas

II.   Plantas forrajeras

III.   Plantas oleaginosoas y fibrosas

IV.   Cereales

V.   Patatas

----

NOTAS EXPLICATIVAS

----

(1)DO C 68 A de 21.3.2006, p. 1. Catálogo modificado en último lugar por el quinto suplemento (DO C 193 A de 17.8.2006, p. 1).

(2)DO L 193 de 20.7.2002, p. 1. Directiva modificada en último lugar por el Reglamento (CE) no 1829/2003 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo (DO L 268 de 18.10.2003, p. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

5.AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA L.

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

9.BROMUS CATHARTICUS VAHL

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

16A.× FESTULOLIUM

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

27.POA TRIVIALIS L.

30.LOTUS CORNICULATUS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

34.MEDICAGO LUPULINA L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

40.TRIFOLIUM HYBRIDUM L.

41.TRIFOLIUM INCARNATUM L.

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

44.TRIFOLIUM RESUPINATUM L.

45.TRIGONELLA FOENUM-GRAECUM L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

48.VICIA SATIVA L.

50.BRASSICA NAPUS L. VAR. NAPOBRASSICA (L.) RCHB.

51.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. ACEPHALA (DC.) ALEF. VAR. MEDULLOSA THELL. + VAR. VIRIDIS L.

52.PHACELIA TANACETIFOLIA BENTH.

53.RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. VAR. OLEIFORMIS PERS.

III

56.BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERNJ ET COSSON

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

58.BRASSICA NIGRA (L.) KOCH

59.CANNABIS SATIVA L.

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

65.PAPAVER SOMNIFERUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

73.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH

74.SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

75.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH × SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-20556 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GERALDO MENDOZA-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-53-1

-------------------- April 12, 2001 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and JONES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Geraldo Mendoza-Martinez appeals the conviction and 87-month sentence imposed following his plea of guilty to a charge of illegal reentry into the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment. Mendoza-Martinez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but heNo. 00-20556 -2- seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 120 S. Ct. 2348 (2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 120 S. Ct. at 2362; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). MendozaMartinez’s argument is foreclosed. Mendoza-Martinez argues that his indictment was defective under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments because it did not allege general intent. Because Mendoza-Martinez did not challenge his indictment in the district court, we review whether it was constitutionally sufficient under a "maximum liberality" standard. See United States v. Guzman-Ocampo , 236 F.3d 233, 236 (5th Cir. 2000). Mendoza-Martinez’s indictment “fairly imported that his reentry was a voluntary act” and satisfied the constitutional requirements of a valid indictment. See id. at 236, 239 & n.13. Mendoza-Martinez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 12

                         JOSTENS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
         COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                       Years ended
                                                           ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           December 29,  December 30,    January 1,       January 2,     January 3,
Dollars in thousands                                           2001          2000          2000             1999           1998
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                         <C>            <C>            <C>             <C>             <C>

Earnings
Income from continuing operations before income taxes       $ 26,540       $(10,468)      $43,999         $35,952         $52,379

Interest expense (excluding capitalized interest)             79,035         60,252         7,486           7,026           6,866

Portion of rent expense under long-term operating leases
representative of an interest factor                           1,164          1,121         1,483           1,233           2,133

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total earnings                                              $106,739       $ 50,905       $52,968         $44,211         $61,378
===================================================================================================================================

Fixed charges
Interest expense (including capitalized interest)           $ 79,035       $ 60,252       $ 7,887         $ 7,729         $ 6,866

Portion of rent expense under long-term operating leases
representative of an interest factor                           1,164          1,121         1,483           1,233           2,133

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total fixed charges                                         $ 80,199       $ 61,373       $ 9,370         $ 8,962         $ 8,999
====================================================================================================================================

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                               1.3            0.8           5.7             4.9             6.8

</TABLE>
No. 60818.

#### Kittay & Blitz, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 212914-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted; (2) the items marked with the letters “B” and “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted; and (3) the items marked with the letter “D” at 30 percent under the same provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802 and T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not cut or faceted.
Case 2:02-cv-04377-JD     Document 17      Filed 03/24/2003     Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-04377-JD     Document 17      Filed 03/24/2003     Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-04377-JD     Document 17      Filed 03/24/2003     Page 3 of 3
Dear Mr. Gibbons:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition 

(Docket No. FAA−2015−2868). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or 

electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any 

further, we must receive the information described above by 11/11/15. If we do not receive the 

information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4549.

Sincerely,

/s/

Michael J. Cameron

Program Analyst
Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID

ASRAC Webinar 265936657

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) 

Jun 27, 2013 02:28 PM EDT 107

Total Attended

49

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Organization

Karim Amrane AHRI

Jeff Bauman National Refrigeration and Air Conditioning

Rodney Beever United CoolAir Corp.

Sarah Blackwood Banner Public Affairs

Alex Boesenberg NEMA

Rob Boteler Confluence Energy

Ryan Carroll Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association

Greg Case Pump Design, Development & Diagnostics

John Caskey NEMA

Tim Cassidy Best Buy

Steven Cousins The Coca-Cola Company

John Cymbalsky EERE

Mary Dane Traulsen

Andrew deLaski

Tom Eckmqn Northwest Power and Conservation Council

Mark Fly AAON Inc.

Mark Friedrichs DOE

Manny Gonzalez GE Power Conversion

Keith Goshia Emerson Network Power

Robert Hart Consortium for Energy Efficiency

David Hungerford California Energy Commission

General Information
Diane Jakobs Rheem

Dominic Kolandayan Daikin AC (Americas), Inc.

Bijit Kundu Energy Solutions

Emily Liggett NovaTorque

Paul Lin Regal Beloit

Ian Magenta Smiths Group

John Mandyck United Technologies

Mark Menzer Intertek

Karen Meyers Rheem Mfg Co

Eli Morris

Massoud Neshan Southern store Fixtures, inc.

charity njau Felix Storch

Elizabeth Noll

Kent Peterson P2S Engineering, Inc.

Robert Peterson Rheem Manufacturing Co.

Philip Picotte CEE

Steve Rosenstock Edison Electric Institute

Frank Ryan

John Sabelli Sabelli Engineering

Terry Small Mortex

Joe St John DNV KEMA

Stephen Tabor Bluffton Motor Works

Jay Taylor Schneider Electric

Rusty Tharp Goodman Manufacturing

Greg Towsley

Christie Ulman US DOE

Dennis Ulman GE Power Conversion

Linda Wilson
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of IEH Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending March 26, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, being, Michael Offerman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), and Robert Knoth, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer), of the Company, respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  July 9, 2010





/s/ Michael Offerman
/s/ Robert KnothMichael Offerman
Robert KnothPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
(Principal Accounting Officer)





This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed “filed” by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7119

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

LLOYD GEORGE MAXWELL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-262-A; CA-04-635)

Submitted: December 23, 2004 Decided: January 7, 2005

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd George Maxwell, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas More Hollenhorst,

Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd George Maxwell seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his “New Rules Notice of Motion for a Writ of Habeas

Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [2000]”. An appeal may not be

taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 338 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Maxwell has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, while we grant his motion to file a

supplemental informal brief, we deny his motion for a certificate

of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Maxwell’s notice of appeal and

informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or

successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See United States v.

Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 995

(2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive
- 3 -

§ 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either: (1)

a new rule of constitutional law, previously unavailable, made

retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on collateral review; or

(2) newly discovered evidence that would be sufficient to establish

by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder

would have found the petitioner guilty of the offense. 28 U.S.C.

§§ 2244(b)(2), 2255 (2000). Maxwell’s claims do not satisfy either

of these conditions. Therefore, we decline to authorize Maxwell to

file a successive § 2255 motion. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Welwind Energy International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Tammy-Lynn McNabb, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Tammy-Lynn
      McNabbTammy-Lynn
      McNabb,
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                April
      4, 2008
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4050 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline to commence construction of certain 

hydroelectric projects on the Red River. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 4050 ES

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO COMMENCE CON2 STRUCTION OF CERTAIN HYDROELECTRIC 

3 PROJECTS ON THE RED RIVER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to Federal Energy 

7 Regulatory Commission projects numbered P–12756 and 

8 P–13160, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (re9 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at 

10 the request of the licensee for the applicable project, and 

11 after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, 

12 due diligence, and public interest requirements of that sec13 tion and the procedures of the Commission under that sec14 tion, extend the time period during which each licensee 

15 is required to commence construction of the applicable 

16 project for one year from the date of the expiration of 

17 the extension most recently issued by the Commission 

18 under that section for the applicable project. 

19 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

20 time period required under section 13 of the Federal 

21 Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) for commencement of con22 struction of a project described in subsection (a) expires 

23 before the date of enactment of this Act— 

24 (1) the Commission may reinstate the license 

25 for the applicable project effective as of the date of 

26 expiration of the license; and 
3 

†S 4050 ES

1 (2) the extension authorized under subsection 

2 (a) shall take effect on the date of that expiration. 

Passed the Senate March 21, 2024. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4050 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline to commence construction of 

certain hydroelectric projects on the Red River.
No. 55235.

#### Stanley Korshak, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 149620-K/2214 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entry for the date of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entry and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entry are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoice should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
Before the Third Division,

January 30, 1950

No. 53995.

#### F. B. Vandegrift & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 136037-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - [Report No. 2805] 

A Petition for Reconsideration has been filed in the Commission's Rulemaking proceeding listed in this Public Notice and published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). The full text of this document is available for viewing and copying in Room CY-B402, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC or may be purchased from the Commission's copy contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc. (BCPI) (1-800-378-3160). Oppositions to this petition must be filed by March 16, 2007. See Section 1.4(b)(1) of the Commission's rules (47 CFR 1.4(b)(1)). Replies to an opposition must be filed within 10 days after the time for filing oppositions has expired. 

*Subject:*                     In the Matter of Reallocation of 30 MHz of 700 MHz Spectrum (747-762/777-792 MHz) from Commercial Use (RM-11348).                 

Assignment of 30 MHz of 700 MHz Spectrum (747-762/777-792 MHz) to the Public Safety Broadband Trust for Deployment of a Shared Public Safety/Commercial Next Generation Wireless Network. 

*Number of Petitions Filed:*                     1.                 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. E7-3518 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vitasti, Inc.  (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tammy-Lynn McNabb,
      Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: April
      6,
      2006


By: /s/
      TAMMY-LYNN MCNABB





Name:
      Tammy-Lynn McNabb


Title:
        Chief Financial Officer
No. 52242.

Suit 4578.

#### Roche-Organon, Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1048 reversed January 6, 1948. C. A. D. 378.