alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 1 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 2 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 3 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 4 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 5 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 6 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 7 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 8 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 9 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 10 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 11 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 12 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 13 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 14 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 15 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 16 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 17 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 18 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 19 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 20 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 21 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 22 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 23 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 24 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 25 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 26 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 27 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 28 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 29 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 30 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 31 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 32 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 33 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 34 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 35 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 36 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 37 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 38 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 39 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 40 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 41 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 42 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 43 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 44 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-20131-HB Document 5 Filed 04/04/2005 Page 45 of 45
No. 51685.

#### Protest 119496-K of Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd. (Honolulu).

*189Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co.*(32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303). In accordance therewith certain items of the merchandise were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1705 as kelp, and other items were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured.
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 10/27/2023 1

Letting Campaign Workers 

Use the Restroom at Polling Places 

Robinson v. Shelby County Election Commission 

(John T. Fowlkes, Jr., W.D. Tenn. 2:19-cv-2653) 

A federal district judge ruled that it was unconstitutional to prohibit 

campaign workers—so long as they did not display visible campaign 

materials while in the building—from using the restroom at polling 

places. 

Subject: Polling-place activities. Topics: Poll locations; removal. 

On Thursday, September 26, 2019, Shelby County’s election commission, its 

administrator, and its members removed to federal court in the Western District of Tennessee a September 25 complaint filed in Tennessee’s chancery 

court seeking an injunction permitting campaign workers to use restrooms at 

polling places.1

 On Friday, the plaintiffs—a candidate, an organization, and 

two campaign workers—filed in federal court a motion for a preliminary injunction, noting that in past elections campaign workers could use restrooms 

at polling places so long as they did not display campaign materials in the 

buildings.2

Judge John T. Fowlkes, Jr., set the case for hearing on Monday.3 He granted 

the plaintiffs relief on Wednesday.4 Requiring campaign workers to travel to 

other locations to find a restroom infringes their rights of speech and association while they are away from the area.5

Judge Fowlkes granted a stipulated dismissal on January 30, 2020.6

1. Notice of Removal, Robinson v. Shelby Cty. Election Comm’n, No. 2:19-cv-2653 (W.D. 

Tenn. Sept. 26, 2019), D.E. 1; see Amended Complaint, id. (Sept. 30, 2019), D.E. 9. 

2. Preliminary-Injunction Motion, id. (Sept. 27, 2019), D.E. 6. 

3. Notice of Setting, id. (Sept. 27, 2019), D.E. 7; see Docket Sheet, id. (Sept. 26, 2019) 

(minutes, D.E. 10). 

4. Opinion, id. (Oct. 2, 2019), D.E. 20. 

5. Id. at 12. 

6. Order, id. (Jan. 30, 2020), D.E. 34.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4025 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4025

To include the identification of countries that are significant sources 
  of xylazine in the annual International Narcotics Control Strategy 
                                Report.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2024

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Merkley, 
Mr. Coons, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the following bill; which was 
     read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To include the identification of countries that are significant sources 
  of xylazine in the annual International Narcotics Control Strategy 
                                Report.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening Tracking Of Poisonous 
Tranq Requiring Analyzed National Quantification Act of 2024'' or the 
``STOP TRANQ Act''

SEC. 2. INTERNATIONAL NARCOTICS CONTROL STRATEGY REPORT.

    Section 489(a)(11) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2291h(a)(11)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by inserting ``, xylazine,'' after 
        ``illicit fentanyl''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by inserting ``)'' before the 
        semicolon at the end.
                                 <all>
```
No. 47817.

#### Protest 1099-K of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp. (New York).

*356Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in all material respects to the merchandise covered by Abstract 47109, and in view of the further stipulation that they are not composed in any part of synthetic resin or ivory, that they do not imitate pearls, and are not imitation pearl beads, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1503 by virtue of T. D. 49458, as claimed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 While different schedules governed the time for discovery as between plaintiff and

Martinez and plaintiff and the other defendants, the April 18, 2008, amended schedule governed

the time for dispositive motions as between plaintiff and all defendants. See Order of January 3,

2008, granting defendants’ motion to modify the schedules.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0776 LKK EFB P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants move to modify the April 18, 2008, scheduling order.1

 Plaintiff has

not filed any opposition.

A schedule may be modified upon a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). Good

cause exists when the moving party demonstrates he cannot meet the deadline despite exercising

due diligence. Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992). 

Pursuant to the April 18, 2008, schedule, dispositive motions had to be filed no later than

October 3, 2008. Defendants, represented by the Office of the Attorney General, assert that an

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 131 Filed 11/25/08 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

illness and death in their attorney’s family caused the attorney to be unavailable for extended

periods of time. Thus, they could not comply with the schedule. They did assert, however, that

they could file a dispositive motion in early November 2008. On November 8, 2008, defendants

filed a motion for summary judgment.

Good cause appearing therefore, defendants’ September 30, 2008, motion to modify the

schedule is granted and defendants’ motion for summary judgment is accepted as timely filed. 

Plaintiff shall file his opposition within thirty (30) days.

Dated: November 24, 2008.

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 131 Filed 11/25/08 Page 2 of 2
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 11-3608

___________________________

Maurice Kariuki Gita Waweru

lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

v.

Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States

lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent

____________

Petition for Review of an Order of the

 Board of Immigration Appeals

____________

 Submitted: May 9, 2012

 Filed: October 5, 2012

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BYE, COLLOTON, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Kenyan citizen Maurice Kariuki Gita Waweru petitions for review of an order

of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which affirmed an immigration judge’s

denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against

Torture (CAT). This court lacks jurisdiction to review determinations regarding the

untimeliness of Waweru’s asylum application. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3); Gumaneh
v. Mukasey, 535 F.3d 785, 788 (8th Cir. 2008). As to Waweru’s remaining

contentions, we decline to consider arguments and evidence that were not presented

to the BIA. See Doe v. Holder, 651 F.3d 824, 830 (8th Cir. 2011); Lukowski v. INS,

279 F.3d 644, 646 (8th Cir. 2002) (“judicial review is limited to administrative

record”). We conclude that substantial evidence supports the denials of withholding

of removal and CAT relief, and that Waweru’s due process rights were not violated.

For these reasons, we dismiss the petition with respect to the asylum claim and

deny it in all other respects. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
No. 61306.

protests 271186-K, etc. (New York).

#### Plus Computing Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of key-driven calculating machines the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Plus Computing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 160, C. A. D. 655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3970 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3970

To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the Secretary of 
    Veterans Affairs repays members of the Armed Forces for certain 
   contributions made by such members towards Post-9/11 Educational 
                  Assistance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 19, 2024

   Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Tillis, and Ms. Sinema) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 38, United States Code, to ensure that the Secretary of 
    Veterans Affairs repays members of the Armed Forces for certain 
   contributions made by such members towards Post-9/11 Educational 
                  Assistance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPAYMENT OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR CONTRIBUTIONS 
              TOWARD POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL ASSISTANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 3327(f)(3) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``together'' and all that follows through 
``(as applicable),''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on August 1, 2023.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN HOUSING LOAN FEES.

    The loan fee table in section 3729(b)(2) of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended by striking ``November 14, 2031'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``November 28, 2031''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41123

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE MARTINEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:07-CR-794-ALL

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Martinez has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Martinez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the

record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
EXHIBIT 22
                                                                
                                                                 
              INTER-REGIONAL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
                      LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                        December 31, 1995
                                
                                                          Percentage
                                             State in       of Voting
                                               Which       Securities
Name                                       Incorporated       Owned
----                                      ---------------------------
Consolidated subsidiaries of Registrant:

Dain Bosworth Incorporated                  Delaware           100%
IFG Asset Management Services, Inc.         Minnesota          100
Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc.               Delaware           100
Regional Operations Group, Inc.             Minnesota          100

Consolidated subsidiaries of Dain Bosworth Incorporated:

Clayton Brown Capital Corp.                 Delaware           100
Dain Equity Partners, Inc.                  Minnesota          100
Dain Kalman & Quail Municipal-
  Nebraska, Inc.                            Nebraska           100

Consolidated subsidiaries of Rauscher Pierce Refsnes, Inc.:

Rauscher Pierce Refsnes Leasing, Inc.       Arizona            100
RP Transportation Corp.                     Delaware           100
RPR Mortgage Finance Corporation            Texas              100
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 40 (Thursday, March 1, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9336-9337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3570]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than March 16, 2007.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Tracy Basinger, Director, 
Regional and Community Bank Group) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, 
California 94105-1579:
    1. NHB Holdings, Inc., and Proficio Mortgage Ventures, LLC, both of 
Jacksonville, Florida; to engage de novo through a joint venture with 
Plus Relocation Mortgage Solutions, Minneapolis, Minnesota, and thereby 
engage in Mortgage related activities pursuant to section 225.28(b)(1) 
of Regulation Y.



[[Page 9337]]


    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 23, 
2007.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-3570 Filed 2-28-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10596

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RENE BARRIENTES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-129-11

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rene Barrientes pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to 

distribute methamphetamine. Included in the calculation of his offense level 

was a two-level enhancement for possession of a firearm pursuant to U.S.S.G. 

§ 2D1.1(b)(1) and a two-level enhancement for importation of 

methamphetamine pursuant to § 2D1.1(b)(5). The district court overruled 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 31, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10596 Document: 00514012902 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/31/2017
No. 16-10596

2

Barrientes’s objections to the enhancements and sentenced him to 360 months 

of imprisonment and four years of supervised release.

On appeal, Barrientes argues that the district court erred in imposing 

the enhancement in § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a firearm because he 

personally did not possess a firearm and he had no knowledge that his 

codefendants possessed a firearm. He also argues that the district court erred 

in imposing the enhancement in § 2D1.1(b)(5) for importation of 

methamphetamine because did not know that the methamphetamine was 

imported. He concedes that this court has previously rejected both arguments,

but respectfully requests that we revisit our precedent. 

Barrientes’s arguments are foreclosed by United States v. AguileraZapata, 901 F.2d 1209, 1215 (5th Cir. 1990), and United States v. Serfass, 684 

F.3d 548, 552 (5th Cir. 2012), respectively. In Aguilera-Zapata, we held that 

the enhancement in § 2D1.1(b)(1) applies when a codefendant’s possession of a 

firearm during the offense was reasonably foreseeable. 901 F.2d at 1215. In 

Serfass, 684 F.3d at 552, we held that the enhancement in § 2D1.1(b)(5) applies 

when the offense involved the importation of methamphetamine regardless of 

whether the defendant knew of that importation. Accordingly, the 

Government’s unopposed motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the

Government’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a brief is 

DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-10596 Document: 00514012902 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/31/2017
### M E M O R A N D UM

T O: SS I N S

P S AN D E G D O C K E

T
F R O M: A MY L

A M S O N
, R I S K AN D B E N E F I T S GR

O U P
S U B J E C T: H E A LT H I N C I D E N C E S F O R SS I F I NA L R U L E
D A T E: 2

/ 18 / 201 1

D u e t o t i m e li m i t

a t i o n s und e r

t h e c o u r t

- o r d e r e d s c h e d u l e , we we r

e un a b l e t o f u ll y upd a t

e t h e R IA s f o r t h e SS I N S

P S a nd E G f

o r t h e f i n a l r u l e

. W

e p r o v i d e t h i s m e m o

t o t h e d o c k e t as d o c u m e n t a t i o n o f t h e e s

t i m a t e d h e a l t h i n c

i d e n c e s t o s upp o r t t h e i n f

o r m a t i o n i n

t h e
c o mm un i c a t i o n m a t e r i a l s

. T h e s e h e a l t h i n c

i d e n c e s we r e c a l c u l a t e d u s i n g t h e m e t h o d o l o g

y d e s c r i b e d i n t h e p r o p o sa l R IA u s

i n g t h e e m i s s i o n r e du ct i o n s e s

t i m a t e d f o r t h e f i n a l r u l e , w

h i c h i s
a v a il a b l e a t h tt p : //

www

. e p a

. g o v/ tt n / e c as / r i a

. h t ml

.
Su mm a r y o f R e d u c

t i on s i n H e a l t h I n c

i d e n c e s f r o m PM 2.5 f

o r t h e F i na l SS I N S P

S and E G i n 2015

*

F i na l M A C

T F l oo r A vo i d e d Pr

e m a t u r e M o r t a li t

y

P o p e e t a l. 2 L a d e n e t a l. 6 A vo i d e d M o r b i d i t

y C h r o n i c Br o n c h i t i s 2 A c u t e M y o c ar d i a l I n far ct i o n 4 H o s p i t a l A d m i s s i o n s , R e s p i ra t o r y 1 H o s p i t a l A d m i s s i o n s , C ar d i o v as c u l a r 1 E m e r g e n c y R oo m V i s i t s , R e s p i ra t o r y 2 A c u t e Br o n c h i t i s 4 W o rk L o ss D a y s 32 0 A s t h m a E xa c e r b a t i o n 42 M R A D 1
, 90 0 Lo we r R e s p i ra t o r y S y m p t o m s 46 U pp e r R e s p i ra t o r y S y m p t o m s 35

* T h e s e h e a l t h i n c

i d e n c e s ar e 81 % l o we r t h a n t h o s

e s h o w n i n t h e p r o p o sa l R IA f

o r t h i s r u l e

.