alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Strategic Internet Investments, Incorporated
  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report").
  I, Ralph Shearing, President and CEO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18
  USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
  of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief.

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company.

Signed: /s/ Ralph Shearing
                
  Ralph Shearing, President/CEO

Dated:
    April 13, 2004

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4080 

To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study and submit a report 

on national resource adequacy, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 9, 2024 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study and 

submit a report on national resource adequacy, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON NATIONAL RESOURCE 

4 ADEQUACY. 

5 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

6 (1) RESOURCE ADEQUACY.—The term ‘‘re7 source adequacy’’ means the ability of supply-side 

8 and demand-side resources to meet aggregate elec9 tricity demand (including losses). 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4080 IS

1 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

2 the Secretary of Energy. 

3 (b) STUDY.—The Secretary shall conduct a com4 prehensive study on national resource adequacy to deter5 mine— 

6 (1) how recent retirements of baseload electric 

7 generation have affected the regional firm capacity 

8 available for all regional electric grids; 

9 (2) the effects that planned retirements of base10 load electric generation and the increased need for 

11 peaking capacity have or would have on energy 

12 shortfalls; 

13 (3) how the variable nature of certain sources 

14 of energy production and forecasting errors may im15 pact resource adequacy and capacity accreditation; 

16 (4)(A) a range of potential future electricity de17 mand trajectories that captures the uncertainty rep18 resented by a changing climate, decarbonization, and 

19 macroeconomic factors; and 

20 (B) whether that future electricity demand re21 quires increasing firm capacity or interregional 

22 transmission to load match with regional peak power 

23 demand during all hours of the year; and 

24 (5) the extent to which variable generation 

25 technologies in concert with other technical and nonVerDate Sep 11 2014 22:32 Apr 14, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4080.IS S4080

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4080 IS

1 technical solutions can provide adequate capacity to 

2 meet a range of potential future electricity demand 

3 trajectories. 

4 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

5 of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit to 

6 the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the 

7 Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of 

8 the House of Representatives a report describing the re9 sults of the study conducted under subsection (b), includ10 ing recommendations for Congress to ensure that the 

11 United States maintains necessary resource adequacy to 

12 meet forecasted demand. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 9/14/2023 1

Challenging a Victor’s Residence Qualification 

Harris v. Diaz (Richard M. Berman, S.D.N.Y. 1:04-cv-9124) 

A district judge dismissed a postelection complaint that a victorious 

legislature candidate did not live in the district he was elected to 

represent. On the one hand, the appropriate proceeding would be a 

state-court quo warranto action; on the other hand, the time to 

challenge eligibility was before the election. 

Subject: Voting irregularities. Topics: Enjoining certification; 

matters for state courts; laches. 

Sixteen days after the November 2, 2004, general election, a voter filed a federal complaint in the Southern District of New York alleging that the victor 

in an election for New York’s senate did not live in his district.1

On the following day, Judge Richard M. Berman held a conference with 

the parties and denied the voter immediate relief.2 Judge Berman dismissed 

the complaint on December 13.3 On the one hand, the proper procedure to 

litigate the plaintiff’s claims would be a quo warranto action in state court.4

On the other hand, the time to challenge the senator’s qualifications was 

more properly before the election.5

1. Complaint, Harris v. Diaz, No. 1:04-cv-9124 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 18, 2004), D.E. 1; see David Saltonstall & Christina Silva, Home Away from “Home,” N.Y. Daily News, Nov. 30, 2004, 

at 19 (reporting also that the victor spent only a handful of nights each month at the address 

he listed as his residence). 

2. Opinion at 3, Harris, No. 1:04-cv-9124 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2004), D.E. 13, 2004 WL 

2912888. 

3. Id. at 11; see Bill Egbert, Fed Judge Tosses Diaz Suit, N.Y. Daily News, Dec. 17, 2004, 

at 3. 

4. Opinion, supra note 2, at 9–11. 

5. Id.
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Training
- SPS Improvements for 2024 Webinar

# SPS Improvements for 2024 Webinar

Audience:

Open to all federal agency employees & vendors

- System Users
- Accountants
- Programmers
- Vendors

----

Location:

Online

----

Duration:

- Wednesday, April 24, 2024
- 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm ET
- Wednesday, July 10, 2024
- 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm ET
- Wednesday, October 16, 2024
- 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm ET

----

Cost:

Free

----

Hosted by:

Disbursing and Debt Management

----

Point of Contact:

FS.AgencyOutreach@fiscal.treasury.gov

## Event Details:

This webinar is designed to provide a high-level overview of the Secure Payment System (SPS) application as well as upcoming changes/refinements, the New FedNow Instant payment type, and previous enhancement recap.

There is no charge for this webinar.

You will need access to a phone and computer to participate in the webinar session. Logistical Information will be provided 1-2 days prior to the session.

### Registration Form

Fields marked with an asterisk(*) are required.

Last modified 03/13/24
Last updated on Monday, January 28, 2013

http://cfpub.epa.gov/dmr/facility_search.cfm

Search

About the Data Glossary Error Correction Contact Us

Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Pollutant Loading Tool

Note: The tool uses discharge monitoring report (DMR) data from ICIS-NPDES and PCS to calculate pollutant discharge amounts. EPA has verified the accuracy of the tool’s calculations. EPA has 

also performed a limited review of the underlying data that has focused on facilities with the largest amounts of pollutant discharges. Due to the large amount of DMR data, additional errors exist in 

ICIS-NPDES and PCS. Please see the User’s Guide (29 pp, 2.6MB), Frequently Asked Questions and Answers, and Error Correction page for instructions on how to use the tool and how to correct 

errors in ICIS-NPDES and PCS. You can send an email to waterloadings@epa.gov with any comments or questions about the tool. You can sign up for our e-mail news bulletin and be notified 

when new data, enhancements, or training materials are available. The tool also uses wastewater pollutant discharge data from the Toxics Release Inventory (TRI).

Facility Search (DMR)

Instructions. This Facility Search provides direct access to basic facility information and top pollutant discharges for one facility at a time. Enter or select a value for one or more of the 

criteria below and click the Search button to retrieve information on a facility. The Facility Search tool will find the facility(ies) that match all of the entered criteria. If more than one facility 

matches, a list of facilities will be provided from which you can choose. For more information about how to use this search feature, refer to the User’s Guide for the Discharge Monitoring 

Report (DMR) Pollutant Loading Tool (PDF) (29 pp, 2.6MB) or Frequently Asked Questions and Answers (FAQ).

Select Reporting Year: 2011

Facility Name:

NPDES Permit ID:

FRS ID:

TRI ID:

CWNS ID:

View Additional Search Criteria

DMR Pollutant Loading Tool | US EPA Page 1 of 1

http://cfpub.epa.gov/dmr/facility_search.cfm 1/28/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from financial
statements  in the Form 10-Q of Brill  Media  Company,  LLC for the nine  months
ended  November  30, 1998 and is  qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                     NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                             6,118,000
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      6,292,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                          555,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  13,671,000
<PP&E>                                            22,972,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     9,922,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    69,710,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              8,537,000
<BONDS>                                          113,154,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (51,981,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      69,710,000
<SALES>                                           31,483,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  31,483,000
<CGS>                                             26,880,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     26,880,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     126,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 8,827,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (4,351,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         137,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (4,487,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (4,487,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
        


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MERRICK JOSE MOORE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0871 MCE EFB P

vs.

J. SLOSS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 / AD TESTIFICANDUM

C. Gibson, inmate # H-39349, a necessary and material witness in proceedings in

this case on September 7, 2010, is confined in California State Prison- Corcoran, Corcoran,

California, in the custody of the Warden; in order to secure this inmate's attendance it is

necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to

produce the inmate in Court, 14th Floor, Courtroom 7, United States Courthouse, 501 I Street,

Sacramento, California on September 7, 2010, at 9:00 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to testify in United States District

Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of court proceedings or

as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution; 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this

inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order and

writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum on the Out-To-Court Desk.

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden Raul Lopez, California State Prison, Corcoran, 4001 King Avenue, P.O. Box

8800, Corcoran, California, 93212:

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before the

United States District Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of

the proceedings or as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above

institution.

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody

of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

DATED: August 3, 2010.

Case 2:04-cv-00871-MCE -EFB Document 153 Filed 08/04/10 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
for the period ended September 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                              By:  /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: November 9, 2007
______________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
No. 51671.

#### Protests 877963-G, etc., of H. L. Caplan & Co., Inc., et al. (Portland, Oreg., and Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400, the court dismissed the protests.
1 In our Order of July 8, 2002, we denied as cumulative that

portion of the defendant’s pro se Motion to Stop Leonie Brinkema

DJ [sic] Playing Games With My Life (Docket #426) that objected

to our refusal to accept his no contest plea.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Criminal No. 01-455-A

)

ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI )

a/k/a “Shaqil,” )

a/k/a “Abu Khalid )

al Sahrawi,” )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Before the Court is the defendant’s pro se Motion to Confirm

My No Plea Entry (Docket #236).1 In this motion, Mr. Moussaoui

complains that the Court has manipulated his defense and has

undermined his credibility by refusing to accept his “no contest”

plea. 

The defendant clearly does not understand the legal

significance of a nolo contendere or “no contest” plea. The

Latin phrase “nolo contendere” means “I will not contest it.”

Black’s Law Dictionary 1048 (6th ed. 1990). A plea of nolo

contendere or “no contest” is an admission of guilt which can

subject a defendant to the same punishment that he could receive

if he were to plead guilty. See United States v. Kahn, 822 F.2d

451, 455 (4th Cir. 1987); United States v. Dorman, 496 F.2d 438,

440 (4th Cir. 1974). 
2

A defendant does not have a right to plead nolo contendere; 

rather, he must have the permission of the Court to enter such a

plea. Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(b); see also Dorman, 496 F.2d at 440. 

In determining whether to allow a defendant to enter such a plea,

the Court must consider, among other factors, “the interest of

the public in the effective administration of justice.” Fed. R.

Civ. P. 11(b). The Court must also determine that such a plea is

knowingly and voluntarily made. 

It has been consistently clear in the defendant’s numerous

motions that he contests the allegations in the Superseding

Indictment. (See, e.g., Docket #s 185, 209, 231, 234, 235, 248,

256, 258, 261, 266 and 279). Such arguments are inconsistent

with a nolo contendere plea and show that such a plea by this

defendant would not be a “knowing” plea as required by Rule 11. 

To accept such a plea on this record would be an abuse of

discretion. For these reasons, the Court has declined to accept

a nolo contendere plea from the defendant. Therefore, the

defendant’s Motion to Confirm My No Plea Entry is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to the

defendant, pro se; counsel for the United States; and standby

defense counsel.

Entered this 9th day of July, 2002.

/s/

 

Leonie M. Brinkema

United States District Judge

Alexandria, Virginia
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management 

          - [ES-960-1420-BJ-TRST] 

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Minnesota.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States, Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                     

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. 

The lands we surveyed are: 

## Fifth Principal Meridian, Minnesota 

T. 141 N., R. 40 W. 

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of a portion of the subdivisional lines; and the dependent resurvey and survey of the subdivision of sections 10, 11, 12, 15, 24 and 36, Township 141 North, Range 40 West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, in the State of Minnesota, and was accepted February 15, 2007. 

We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information. 

If BLM receives a protest against this survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest. 

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals. 

      ( print page 8777)    
Dated: February 15, 2007. 

Jerry L. Wahl, 

Acting Chief Cadastral Surveyor. 

FR Doc. E7-3327 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
Appendix A—Maps of Fire Management Zones
 

Under the Proposed Action
 

93
 








102
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                      10,221,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  161,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,382,536
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,931,265
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          703,738
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    11,227,527
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,931,265
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,036
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,316,423
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,821
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,736,508)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                573,879
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,736,508)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .25
        

</TABLE>