Page 1

DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Affirmative Action Plan

for the Recruitment, Hiring, Advancement, and

Retention of Persons with Disabilities

To capture agencies’ affirmative action plan for persons with disabilities (PWD) and persons with targeted disabilities (PWTD), 

EEOC regulations (29 C.F.R. § 1614.203(e)) and MD-715 require agencies to describe how their affirmative action plan will 

improve the recruitment, hiring, advancement, and retention of applicants and employees with disabilities.

Section I: Efforts to Reach Regulatory Goals

EEOC regulations (29 CFR §1614.203(d)(7)) require agencies to establish specific numerical goals for increasing the participation 

of persons with disabilities and persons with targeted disabilities in the federal government

1. Using the goal of 12% as the benchmark, does your agency have a trigger involving PWD by grade level cluster in the 

permanent workforce? If “yes”, describe the trigger(s) in the text box.

a. Cluster GS-1 to GS-10 (PWD) Answer No

b. Cluster GS-11 to SES (PWD) Answer No

GS-1 to GS-10 (PWD): 45.87% compared to 12% GS-11 to SES (PWD): 33.80% compared to 12%

*For GS employees, please use two clusters: GS-1 to GS-10 and GS-11 to SES, as set forth in 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203(d)(7). For all 

other pay plans, please use the approximate grade clusters that are above or below GS-11 Step 1 in the Washington, DC 

metropolitan region.

2. Using the goal of 2% as the benchmark, does your agency have a trigger involving PWTD by grade level cluster in the 

permanent workforce? If “yes”, describe the trigger(s) in the text box.

a. Cluster GS-1 to GS-10 (PWTD) Answer No

b. Cluster GS-11 to SES (PWTD) Answer No

GS-1 to GS-10 (PWTD): 8.26% compared to 2% GS-11 to SES (PWTD): 3.50% compared to 2%

Grade Level Cluster(GS or Alternate Pay 

Planb)

Total Reportable Disability Targeted Disability

# # % # %

Numarical Goal -- 12% 2%

Grades GS-1 to GS-10 109 50 45.87 9 8.26

Grades GS-11 to SES 931 312 33.51 33 3.54

3. Describe how the agency has communicated the numerical goals to the hiring managers and/or recruiters.

Once the EEOC establishes the numerical goals for each FY, the EEO Office and HCO WMB provide identified goals to key 

stakeholders and the SRDI Council. These goals are also communicated to senior level hiring managers in annual reports such as 

Disabled Veterans Affirmative Action Plan (DVAAP) and the Federal Equal Opportunity Recruitment Program (FEORP). They are 

also shared with FLETC staff through FLETC New Supervisor Training Program. Additionally, Federal disability hiring goals are 

posted on the EEO SharePoint page located under Disability and Reasonable Accommodation – What are Agency Responsibilities 

for Hiring People with Disabilities? Human Resource personnel discuss recruitment strategies with hiring managers, suggesting 

sources with disability in mind e.g., Schedule A direct hire authority, as well as 30% or more disabled veteran hiring sources.
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 2

Section II: Model Disability Program

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203(d)(1), agencies must ensure sufficient staff, training and resources to recruit and hire persons with 

disabilities and persons with targeted disabilities, administer the reasonable accommodation program and special emphasis program, 

and oversee any other disability hiring and advancement program the agency has in place.

A. PLAN TO PROVIDE SUFFICIENT & COMPETENT STAFFING FOR THE DISABILITY 

PROGRAM

1. Has the agency designated sufficient qualified personnel to implement its disability program during the reporting period? 

If “no”, describe the agency’s plan to improve the staffing for the upcoming year.

Answer Yes

To ensure FLETC’s ability to implement and sustain its disability programs, the FLETC employs a dedicated Disability Program 

Manager and four EEO Specialists who process requests for reasonable accommodation (RA) and Personal Assistance Services 

(PAS). Additionally, FLETC employs a Section 508 Coordinator, a Selective Placement Coordinator, a Disability Access 

Coordinator, and alternates to ensure accessibility for employees, students, and visitors to all FLETC points of service. FLETC 

established an assessment process for all requests for Reasonable Accommodation and PAS. This process requires that a 

Reasonable Accommodation Team consisting of an EEO Specialist, an Attorney from the Office of Chief Counsel, and a Labor 

Relations Specialist from the HCO individually assess each RA request. The Team provides advice and procedural guidance to the 

requestor’s supervisor to make an informed decision regarding the reasonable accommodation request. FLETC’s Medical Officer 

acts as an ad-hoc member of the Team providing occupational medical opinions and guidance to the Team. Federal Occupational 

Health Service physicians provide occupational medical opinions through contracted services, as needed.

2. Identify all staff responsible for implementing the agency's disability employment program by the office, staff 

employment status, and responsible official.

Disability Program Task

# of FTE Staff By Employment Status Responsible Official 

(Name, Title, Office 

Full Time Part Time Collateral Duty Email)

Special Emphasis Program for PWD and 

PWTD

1 0 0 Arlene Gonzalez

Disability Program 

Manager

arlene.gonzalez.@fletc.dhs.gov

Architectural Barriers Act Compliance 1 0 0 Arlene Gonzalez

Disability Program 

Manager

arlene.gonzalez@fletc.dhs.gov

Section 508 Compliance 1 0 0 Rose Mary Jones

Program Manager

rosemary.jones@fletc.dhs.gov

Answering questions from the public about 

hiring authorities that take disability into 

account

1 0 0 Malcolm F. Campbell

Human Resources 

Specialist (Recruitment)

malcolm.campbell@fletc.dhs.gov

Processing applications from PWD and PWTD 1 0 0 Malcolm F. Campbell

Human Resources 

Specialist (Recruitment)

malcolm.campbell@fletc.dhs.gov

Processing reasonable accommodation requests 

from applicants and employees

5 0 0 Arlene Gonzalez

Disability Program 

Manager

arlene.gonzalez@fletc.dhs.gov

3. Has the agency provided disability program staff with sufficient training to carry out their responsibilities during the 

reporting period? If “yes”, describe the training that disability program staff have received. If “no”, describe the training 

planned for the upcoming year.

Answer Yes
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 3

The Disability Program Manager and EEO Specialists participated in training, webinars and meetings presented by a variety of 

sources during FY 2021. The training sources included: DHS/CRCL, Disability Employment Advisory Council and Diversity 

Management Section and Component Meetings, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Job Accommodation Network, 

Department of Defense Computer/Electronic Accommodations Program, Federal Exchange on Employment and Disability, 

Department of Labor Employer Assistance & Resource Network, Department of Labor Office of Disability Employment Policy, 

LEAD Center and LRP Publications throughout the fiscal year, and Section 508 training. An 8-hour refresher training through 

CyberFeds E-learning that included training in Applying Disability Laws When Identifying Employees with Disabilities was 

provided to the EEO Specialists with an 85.7% completion rate. All EEO Specialists received training on the ACMS RA tracking 

system.

B. PLAN TO ENSURE SUFFICIENT FUNDING FOR THE DISABILITY PROGRAM

Has the agency provided sufficient funding and other resources to successfully implement the disability program during 

the reporting period? If “no”, describe the agency’s plan to ensure all aspects of the disability program have sufficient 

funding and other resources.

Answer Yes

All EEO, HCO, and Office of Chief Counsel staff who participate in RA and PAS processing and employee training, section 508 

and accessibility have received sufficient training, funding, and guidance to ensure timely completion of requests for these services.

Section III: Program Deficiencies In The Disability Program
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 4

Brief Description of Program 

Deficiency

C.2.b.5. Does the agency process all initial accommodation requests, excluding ongoing interpretative services, within 

the time frame set forth in its reasonable accommodation procedures? [see MD-715, II(C)] If “no”, please provide the 

percentage of timely-processed requests, excluding ongoing interpretative services, in the comments column.

Objective

FLETC Reasonable Accommodation Procedures that are in compliance with EEOC regulations and 

guidance, and to implement procedures to assist agency in processing accommodation requests 

within the timeframe set forth in its reasonable accommodation procedures.

Target Date Jan 18, 2019

Completion Date Sep 14, 2021

Planned Activities

Target Date Completion Date Planned Activity

May 31, 2020 November 22, 2019 Final review of Reasonable Accommodation Directive from MRSD, HCO 

and OCC.

Jun 15, 2020 July 23, 2020 Submission of Reasonable Accommodation Directive to the Director’s 

Office for the review and approval process for new FLETC Directives.

Sep 30, 2020 June 1, 2021 Implement the use of ACMS SMT system to process all reasonable 

accommodation requests ensuring accurate real time tracking processes 

and timeframes. The ACMS system has been revised by DHS. FLETC 

staff will be trained on the new system once revisions are complete. 

FLETC DPM and RAC continue to monitor and maintain an internal 

tracking system for reasonable accommodations for students and 

employees.

Nov 15, 2020 September 14, 2021 Completion and publishing of FLETC Reasonable Accommodation 

Directive.

Accomplishments

Fiscal Year Accomplishment

2021 The compliance rate for processing RA requests continued to improve during FY 

2021. The average processing time for cases closed was 85.7%, which is a 19.9% 

increase over FY 2020’s rate of 71.5%. The average number of days to process 

RA requests was 13.7 days, which is 3.5 days fewer than in FY 2020. The EEO 

staff completed the review process of FLETC’s Reasonable Accommodation 

Directive addressing the updates requested by EEOC. The new directive was 

issued on 9/14/2021 and established reasonable timelines for completion of RA 

requests. The increased focus the EEO staff placed on RA processing and 

timeliness was a considerable factor in this improvement. FLETC is tracking 

Reasonable Accommodation requests utilizing the Accessibility Compliance 

Management System Service Management Tool (ACMS SMT).

2019 FLETC’s Reasonable Accommodation Procedures have been updated to comply 

with EEOC’s regulations and guidance and was submitted to EEOC for review 

and approval on July 18, 2019. Additionally, the EEO Office, in consultation 

with key stakeholders in our Office of Chief Counsel, has incorporated FLETC’s 

Reasonable Accommodation Procedures into a draft Directive that is under 

review through the FLETC Directives Review Process and projected to be 

complete in FY 2020.

2020 The FY 2020 compliance rate reflected a 1.5 percentage point improvement over 

the FY 2019 compliance rate with 71.5% of employee Reasonable 

Accommodation Requests timely- processed in an average of 16.9 days. This 

slight percentage increase could be attributed to having two EEO Specialists 

assigned to provide SME assistance to the Disability Program Manager (DPM) 

with processing in-coming requests for reasonable accommodation; the cases 

were assigned as a “priority assignment.” EEO staff, inclusive of the DPM, also 

worked closely with Office of Chief Counsel, Human Capital Office and 

management officials, to ensure timeframes were met, to every extent possible, 

in compliance with regulatory requirements. The EEO Office also completed the 

review and update of the current EEO directive and procedures; this document is 

currently under concurrent clearance at FLETC and it is anticipated that this new 

guidance will be assistive with improving compliance rates on requests for 

accommodation.
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 5

Section IV: Plan to Recruit and Hire Individuals with Disabilities

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §1614.203(d)(1)(i) and (ii), agencies must establish a plan to increase the recruitment and hiring of 

individuals with disabilities. The questions below are designed to identify outcomes of the agency’s recruitment program plan for 

PWD and PWTD

A. PLAN TO IDENTIFY JOB APPLICATIONS WITH DISABILITIES

1. Describe the programs and resources the agency uses to identify job applicants with disabilities, including individuals with 

targeted disabilities.

Recruitment: FLETC has utilized a variety of targeted outreach efforts for Individuals with Disabilities, veterans, members of 

minority or racial groups, and women to increase these populations in the applicant pool. FLETC was able to participate in nine 

recruitment and outreach events during FY 2021 that included both virtual and in-person attendance. Four of the events were 

targeted to People with Disabilities and Veterans. Additionally, FLETC maintains an open continuous voluntary applicant file for 

specific series and grades of high-volume recruitment positions for those candidates with non-competitive hiring eligibility, 

including Schedule A and 30% or more disabled veterans. Outreach to the following targeted audiences: (Students, Recent 

Graduates, Pathways, Interns, Minorities, Women and STEM) include: Cybercorps®: Scholarship for Service Virtual Job Fair on 

3/3/2021-3/4/2021; Savannah State University Job Fair on 3/10/2021 (HBCU); Bethune Cookman University Job Fair on 3/17/2021 

(HBCU) Outreach to the following targeted audiences: (Veterans, Transitioning Service Members, Military Spouses, Women) US 

Veterans Chamber of Commerce Virtual Recruiting and Hiring Fair on 03/24/21-3/25/21, 06/23/21-06/24/21 and 

09/22/21-09/23/21; Careers and the Disabled Virtual Career Fair on 06/14/21. FLETC continuously reviews and recommends 

changes to the recruitment and outreach process and recruitment sources to ensure the continued success of FLETC’s ability to 

recruit and retain a diverse segment of qualified applicants. The opportunity to participate was significantly reduced due to the CDC 

requirements for social distancing, large groups, and safety and welfare of both recruiters and student populations. In FY 2021, 

FLETC exceeded DHS Workforce Participation Goals for People with Disabilities totaling 372 employees and comprising 34.16% 

of the permanent workforce, exceeding the requirement of 12%. Compared to FY 2020 updated data , this is an increase or 1.04% in 

representation. The participation of People with Targeted Disabilities rose to 4.04% of the permanent workforce (44 employees) 

surpassing FY 2020’s participation rate of 3.73%, exceeding the 2% requirement. Of the sixteen employees with disabilities who 

were hired during FY 2021, six were hired using the Schedule A appointing authority. Three of the Schedule A hires were people 

with targeted disabilities. FLETC exceeded DHS Goals for Schedule A hiring of 1.5% hiring a total of six employees and 

comprising 11.54% of all new hires. FLETC continued to use the Pathways Programs (Pathways), the federal government’s primary 

entry point for students and recent graduates. In FY 2021, four employees were hired under the Pathways Recent Graduates 

Program.

2. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §1614.203(a)(3), describe the agency’s use of hiring authorities that take disability into account 

(e.g., Schedule A) to recruit PWD and PWTD for positions in the permanent workforce

FLETC maintains an open continuous voluntary applicant file for specific series and grades of high-volume recruitment positions 

for those candidates with non-competitive hiring eligibility, including Schedule A and 30% or more disabled veterans.

3. When individuals apply for a position under a hiring authority that takes disability into account (e.g., Schedule A), explain 

how the agency (1) determines if the individual is eligible for appointment under such authority; and, (2) forwards the 

individual's application to the relevant hiring officials with an explanation of how and when the individual may be 

appointed.

The GS-1801, 2210, 0201 and 1102 series are the four-mission critical occupational opportunities that are offered through the 

automated online VAF. This file affords Schedule A applicants and disabled veterans consideration without competition for 

positions for which they are qualified. A 10-point preference file is also maintained that allows HCO to review and refer qualified 

applicants who are 30% or more disabled veterans to hiring managers for the possibility of non-competitive selections. The HCO 

offers these recruitment/hiring options to hiring managers as a first recruitment strategy. HCO staff completes a qualifications 

review of all applicants placed in the status file based on the same criteria as all other veteran applicants. FLETC determines 

eligibility for Schedule A appointment as follows: • The candidate self-identifies as an individual eligible for hiring under a special 
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 6

appointing authority (e.g., Schedule A). As part of the application for employment, the candidate must upload and provide 

documentation used to verify that the individual being hired is indeed a person eligible for hiring under a special appointment 

authority. For Schedule A this would be an ADA disability letter. • When the vacancy announcement closes, the HR Specialist 

reviews applications to determine eligibility and qualifications. The HR Specialist reviews the candidates’ qualifications against the 

vacancy announcement. For Schedule A eligibility, the HR Specialist ensures the documentation provided is addressed from a 

licensed medical professional; a licensed vocational rehabilitation specialist; or any Federal agency, state agency, or agency of the 

District of Columbia or a U.S. territory that issues or provides disability benefits. • If qualified and eligible, the application is 

“tagged” as non-competitively eligible and qualified within the hiring management system. Forwarding the individual's application 

(when a candidate applies through competitive procedures): • If deemed eligible and qualified, the candidate is referred to the 

selecting official on the vacancy certificate. The certificate includes the information that the candidate is non-competitively eligible. 

The hiring manager does not know the hiring authority for each person on their certificate of candidates (e.g., Schedule A, 30% or 

More Vet, VRA), only that everyone on their list is eligible and qualified for consideration. The certificate is issued in alphabetical 

order, regardless of hiring eligibility. • If selected, the HR Specialist requests the Schedule A candidate complete the SF-256 Self 

Identification of Disability Form to clarify the legal authority code for the Schedule A hiring Action. The HR Specialist also 

discusses possible onboarding dates with the hiring manager following completion of any pre-employment security or drug testing 

adjudication. Forwarding the individual's application (when a candidate applies through VAF procedures): • The HR Specialist 

provides a referral list to the hiring manager. All candidates who have applied for a position under the VAF are self-identifying as 

non-competitively eligible. • When the manager has made a selection, the HR Specialist informs the manager what kind of noncompetitive appointment memorandum is required. It is at this time that the manager is informed of the type of appointing 

authorities to be used for the selectee. • If selected, the HR Specialist requests the Schedule A candidate complete the SF-256 Self 

Identification of Disability Form to clarify the legal authority code for the Schedule A hiring Action. Following approval of the noncompetitive memorandum and any pre-employment security or drug testing adjudication, the HR Specialist discusses possible 

onboarding dates with the hiring manager.

4. Has the agency provided training to all hiring managers on the use of hiring authorities that take disability into account 

(e.g., Schedule A)? If “yes”, describe the type(s) of training and frequency. If “no”, describe the agency’s plan to provide 

this training.

Answer Yes

Managers receive training initially and biennially through online training modules in PALMS titled: Employment of People with 

Disabilities: A Roadmap to Success, and through Managers Workshops provided by HCO and EEO. Additionally, HCO provides 

training on the Recruitment Process for Supervisors that includes information about special hiring authorities to include 

employment of individuals with disabilities, which is included in the FLETC New Supervisor Training Program.

B. PLAN TO ESTABLISH CONTACTS WITH DISABILITY EMPLOYMENT ORGANIZATIONS

Describe the agency’s efforts to establish and maintain contacts with organizations that assist PWD, including PWTD, in 

securing and maintaining employment.

FLETC’s Disability Program Manager is a member of the Brunswick Glynn County Council on Disabilities. The mission of the 

Committee is to improve the quality of life of persons with disabilities in the Brunswick Glynn County area by promoting 

opportunities to work and live in an environment free of architectural or attitudinal barriers. The Disability Program Manager shares 

vacancy announcements with the Council members, as well as various other disability related service and support organizations, 

colleges and universities. The HCO utilizes a listing of diversity and disability related contacts and sends those contacts email 

notification of vacancy announcements.

C. PROGRESSION TOWARDS GOALS (RECRUITMENT AND HIRING)

1. Using the goals of 12% for PWD and 2% for PWTD as the benchmarks, do triggers exist for PWD and/or PWTD among 

the new hires in the permanent workforce? If “yes”, please describe the triggers below.

a. New Hires for Permanent Workforce (PWD) Answer No

b. New Hires for Permanent Workforce (PWTD) Answer No
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 7

New Hires for Permanent Workforce (PWD): 40.79% as compared to 12% New Hires for Permanent Workforce (PWTD): 9.21% as 

compared to 2%

New Hires Total

Reportable Disability Targeted Disability

Permanent 

Workforce

Temporary 

Workforce

Permanent 

Workforce

Temporary 

Workforce

(#) (%) (%) (%) (%)

340 16.18 0.00 7.06 0.00

308 15.91 0.00 7.47 0.00

9 11.11 0.00 0.00 0.00

% of Total 

Applicants

% of Qualified 

Applicants

% of New Hires

2. Using the qualified applicant pool as the benchmark, do triggers exist for PWD and/or PWTD among the new hires for any 

of the mission- critical occupations (MCO)? If “yes”, please describe the triggers below. Select “n/a” if the applicant data 

is not available for your agency, and describe your plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. New Hires for MCO (PWD) Answer No

b. New Hires for MCO (PWTD) Answer No

There were nine external selections in the 1801 series during FY 2021. 11.11% of selections were PWD compared to their 

benchmark of 15.91%. There were no external selections for PWTD compared to their benchmark of 7.45%. However, no trigger is 

being identified using the “rule of one” as directed by EEOC in that one gain or loss would remove the trigger.

New Hires to Mission-Critical Occupations

Total

Reportable Disability Targetable Disability

New Hires New Hires

(#) (%) (%)

Numerical Goal -- 12% 2%

1801 GENERAL INSPECTION, 

INVESTIGATION & COMPLIANCE

9 11.11 0.00

3. Using the relevant applicant pool as the benchmark, do triggers exist for PWD and/or PWTD among the qualified internal 

applicants for any of the mission-critical occupations (MCO)? If “yes”, please describe the triggers below. Select “n/a” if 

the applicant data is not available for your agency, and describe your plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. Qualified Applicants for MCO (PWD) Answer No

b. Qualified Applicants for MCO (PWTD) Answer No

There are no triggers for PWD or PWTD using the “rule of one” as directed by EEOC in that one gain or loss would remove the 

trigger. PWD had an application rate of 18.26% and their qualified internal application rate was 18.25%. PWTD qualified at the rate 

of 9.32% compared to their application rate of 9.53%.

4. Using the qualified applicant pool as the benchmark, do triggers exist for PWD and/or PWTD among employees promoted 

to any of the mission- critical occupations (MCO)? If “yes”, please describe the triggers below. Select “n/a” if the 

applicant data is not available for your agency, and describe your plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. Promotions for MCO (PWD) Answer No

b. Promotions for MCO (PWTD) Answer Yes
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 8

The selection rate for PWD in the 1801 series was 28.57% compared to the benchmark of 9.13%. There were no promotions for 

PWTD. The benchmark for PWTD was 9.32% indicating a trigger does exist for this group in FY 2021.

Section V: Plan to Ensure Advancement Opportunities for Employees with 

Disabilities

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §1614.203(d)(1)(iii), agencies are required to provide sufficient advancement opportunities for employees 

with disabilities. Such activities might include specialized training and mentoring programs, career development opportunities, 

awards programs, promotions, and similar programs that address advancement. In this section, agencies should identify, and provide 

data on programs designed to ensure advancement opportunities for employees with disabilities.

A. ADVANCEMENT PROGRAM PLAN

Describe the agency’s plan to ensure PWD, including PWTD, have sufficient opportunities for advancement.

FLETC encourages employee participation in an assortment of career development programs and training opportunities. Thousands 

of self-paced courses are available to employees through Skillsoft and LinkedIn Learning. Development opportunities include job 

related training, participation in the Developmental Assignment Program, DHS Leader Development Competency Café Series, and 

other formal and informal career development programs. General training opportunities were announced throughout the year by 

email and postings through FLETConnect covering a variety of subjects for employees at all grade levels. FLETC continues to 

make available college academic career development opportunities to permanent employees through the Tuition Assistance 

Program (TAP). The TAP reimburses eligible employees for mission-related college courses, helps improve job performance, and 

enhances needed skills for the future. There are several opportunities available for FLETC employees to participate in mentoring 

programs, as either a mentee or mentor. FLETC’s SRDI Council’s ongoing collaboration among HCO, and the EEO Office has 

developed into a viable partnership for participation in numerous community outreach activities, career/job fairs, and conferences at 

colleges and universities throughout the reporting year. The Council’s initiatives focus on, among other objectives, ways to meet 

prescribed workforce representation goals and benchmarks.

B. CAREER DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITES

1. Please describe the career development opportunities that the agency provides to its employees.

FLETC employees have an opportunity to participate in five different mentoring programs: FLETC Mentoring Program, FLETC 8-

hour Cornerstone Mentoring Program, DHS Disability Mentoring Program, DHS Women in Law Enforcement Mentoring Program, 

and the DHS Formal Mentoring Program. The Developmental Assignment Program offers FLETC employees the opportunity to 

grow in new areas to the benefit of the employee, as well as FLETC. This program provides the workforce an opportunity to expand 

job responsibilities; develop competencies and knowledge, skills, and abilities; and learn new tools, techniques, and business 

processes to meet mission requirements. Not all established developmental programs were offered during FY 2021 due to 

COVID-19 constraints. The mission of the DHS Leader Development Program is to maximize mission performance, strengthen the 

DHS leadership bench, and build leadership competencies at all levels of the DHS workforce through a coherent and seamless 

continuum of leader development opportunities across the Department. The Leader Development Program framework is a strategic 

road map designed to yield a stronger cadre of more effective and efficient leaders at every level of DHS leadership. The 

Foundations Program is one part of the strategic road map. The Foundations Program provides Team Members with tools to 

develop their current capabilities and navigate their own leadership development in order to strengthen individual abilities and the 

DHS and FLETC leadership pipeline. Whereas the Foundations Program focuses on the development of one’s own leadership 

behaviors, the Milestones Program provides Team Leads with tools to develop their current capabilities of leading others and 

navigate their own leadership development in order to strengthen management capabilities and the DHS leadership pipeline. In 

2021, FLETC employees had the opportunity to access more than 250,000 instructional videos and courses via LinkedIn Learning 

to help achieve learning goals through relevant, high-quality content. Other developmental opportunities include the FLETC New 

Supervisor Training Program, HR Academy’s Executive Speaker Series, Federal Leadership and Professional Development 

Seminar Series, SES Candidate Development Program, and TAP. Additionally, all employees have access to continuing education 

classes through Skillsoft available in the DHS Performance and Learning Management System.

2. In the table below, please provide the data for career development opportunities that require competition and/or 

supervisory recommendation/ approval to participate.
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 9

Career Development 

Opportunities

Total Participants PWD PWTD

Applicants (#) Selectees (#)

 Applicants 

(%) Selectees (%)

 Applicants 

(%) Selectees (%)

Mentoring Programs 29 29 55.17 100 6.90 100

Internship Programs 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fellowship Programs 0 0 0 0 0 0

Coaching Programs 0 0 0 0 0 0

Training Programs 0 0 0 0 0 0

Detail Programs 7 7 42.86 100 14.29 100

Other Career Development 

Programs

35 35 40.00 100 8.57 100

3. Do triggers exist for PWD among the applicants and/or selectees for any of the career development programs? (The 

appropriate benchmarks are the relevant applicant pool for the applicants and the applicant pool for selectees.) If “yes”, 

describe the trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the applicant data is not available for your agency, and describe your 

plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. Applicants (PWD) Answer No

b. Selections (PWD) Answer No

FY 2021 saw a decrease in the number of employees applying to career development programs by 49%. The benchmark for PWD is 

32.56%. Triggers do not exist for PWD in the application rate for career development programs in FY 2021. No triggers exist for 

PWD in selections as all applicants were selected. FLETC will continue to market career development programs to all employees, 

including those with disabilities.

4. Do triggers exist for PWTD among the applicants and/or selectees for any of the career development programs? (The 

appropriate benchmarks are the relevant applicant pool for the applicants and the applicant pool for selectees.) If “yes”, 

describe the trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the applicant data is not available for your agency, and describe your 

plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. Applicants (PWTD) Answer No

b. Selections (PWTD) Answer No

FY 2021 saw a decrease in the number of employees applying to career development programs by 49%. The benchmark for PWTD 

was 3.93%. Triggers do not exist for PWTD in the application rate for career development programs in FY 2021. No triggers exist 

for PWTD in selections as all applicants were selected. FLETC will continue to market career development programs to all 

employees, including those with disabilities.

C. AWARDS

1. Using the inclusion rate as the benchmark, does your agency have a trigger involving PWD and/or PWTD for any level of 

the time-off awards, bonuses, or other incentives? If “yes”, please describe the trigger(s) in the text box.

a. Awards, Bonuses, & Incentives (PWD) Answer Yes

b. Awards, Bonuses, & Incentives (PWTD) Answer Yes

Time off awards in the category of 1-10 hours presents a trigger for PWTD. Time off awards in the category of 21-30 hours 

presents a trigger for PWD. Average hours for time off awards are consistent across all groups. Monetary awards in the category of 

$501-$999 present a trigger for PWD. Monetary awards in the category of $1000-$1999 presents triggers for both PWD and 

PWTD. Averaged award amounts are less for PWD and PWTD in the $501-$999 and in the $1,000-$1,999 monetary award 
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 10

categories.

Time-Off Awards Total (#)

Reportable 

Disability %

Without Reportable 

Disability %

Targeted Disability 

%

Without Targeted 

Disability %

Time-Off Awards 1 - 10 hours: 

Awards Given

244 23.12 21.85 15.91 24.09

Time-Off Awards 1 - 10 Hours: 

Total Hours

1779 165.32 160.78 113.64 172.26

Time-Off Awards 1 - 10 Hours: 

Average Hours

7.29 1.92 1.07 16.23 0.00

Time-Off Awards 11 - 20 hours: 

Awards Given

52 5.11 4.63 4.55 5.18

Time-Off Awards 11 - 20 Hours: 

Total Hours

735 67.74 67.58 72.73 67.07

Time-Off Awards 11 - 20 Hours: 

Average Hours

14.13 3.56 2.11 36.36 -0.84

Time-Off Awards 21 - 30 hours: 

Awards Given

11 0.54 1.30 0.00 0.61

Time-Off Awards 21 - 30 Hours: 

Total Hours

272 12.90 32.42 0.00 14.63

Time-Off Awards 21 - 30 Hours: 

Average Hours

24.73 6.45 3.60 0.00 7.32

Time-Off Awards 31 - 40 hours: 

Awards Given

2 0.54 0.00 2.27 0.30

Time-Off Awards 31 - 40 Hours: 

Total Hours

80 21.51 0.00 90.91 12.20

Time-Off Awards 31 - 40 Hours: 

Average Hours

40 10.75 0.00 90.91 0.00

Time-Off Awards 41 or more 

Hours: Awards Given

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Time-Off Awards 41 or more 

Hours: Total Hours

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Time-Off Awards 41 or more 

Hours: Average Hours

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Cash Awards Total (#)

Reportable 

Disability %

Without Reportable 

Disability %

Targeted Disability 

%

Without Targeted 

Disability %

Cash Awards: $501 - $999: Awards 

Given

163 14.78 15.34 15.91 14.63

Cash Awards: $501 - $999: Total 

Amount

106340.32 10221.53 9674.85 11305.32 10076.14

Cash Awards: $501 - $999: 

Average Amount

652.39 185.85 91.27 1615.05 -5.88

Cash Awards: $1000 - $1999: 

Awards Given

940 81.45 89.58 81.82 81.40

Cash Awards: $1000 - $1999: Total 

Amount

1255900 107392.47 120535.46 106818.18 107469.51

Cash Awards: $1000 - $1999: 

Average Amount

1336.06 354.43 194.73 2967.18 3.94

Cash Awards: $2000 - $2999: 

Awards Given

6 0.54 0.58 0.00 0.61

Cash Awards: $2000 - $2999: Total 

Amount

13500 1075.27 1374.82 0.00 1219.51

Cash Awards: $2000 - $2999: 

Average Amount

2250 537.63 343.70 0.00 609.76

Cash Awards: $3000 - $3999: 

Awards Given

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 11

Cash Awards Total (#)

Reportable 

Disability %

Without Reportable 

Disability %

Targeted Disability 

%

Without Targeted 

Disability %

Cash Awards: $3000 - $3999: Total 

Amount

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Cash Awards: $3000 - $3999: 

Average Amount

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Cash Awards: $4000 - $4999: 

Awards Given

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Cash Awards: $4000 - $4999: Total 

Amount

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Cash Awards: $4000 - $4999: 

Average Amount

0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Cash Awards: $5000 or more: 

Awards Given

3 0.27 0.29 0.00 0.30

Cash Awards: $5000 or more: Total 

Amount

16500 1478.49 1591.90 0.00 1676.83

Cash Awards: $5000 or more: 

Average Amount

5500 1478.49 795.95 0.00 1676.83

2. Using the inclusion rate as the benchmark, does your agency have a trigger involving PWD and/or PWTD for quality step 

increases or performance- based pay increases? If “yes”, please describe the trigger(s) in the text box.

a. Pay Increases (PWD) Answer No

b. Pay Increases (PWTD) Answer No

Other Awards Total (#)

Reportable 

Disability %

Without Reportable 

Disability %

Targeted Disability 

%

Without Targeted 

Disability %

Total Performance Based Pay 

Increases Awarded

10 0.27 1.30 0.00 0.30

3. If the agency has other types of employee recognition programs, are PWD and/or PWTD recognized disproportionately 

less than employees without disabilities? (The appropriate benchmark is the inclusion rate.) If “yes”, describe the 

employee recognition program and relevant data in the text box.

a. Other Types of Recognition (PWD) Answer N/A

b. Other Types of Recognition (PWTD) Answer N/A

D. PROMOTIONS

1. Does your agency have a trigger involving PWD among the qualified internal applicants and/or selectees for promotions to 

the senior grade levels? (The appropriate benchmarks are the relevant applicant pool for qualified internal applicants and 

the qualified applicant pool for selectees.) For non-GS pay plans, please use the approximate senior grade levels. If “yes”, 

describe the trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the applicant data is not available for your agency, and describe your 

plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. SES

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWD) Answer No

ii. Internal Selections (PWD) Answer No

b. Grade GS-15

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWD) Answer Yes
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 12

ii. Internal Selections (PWD) Answer No

c. Grade GS-14

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWD) Answer Yes

ii. Internal Selections (PWD) Answer No

d. Grade GS-13

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWD) Answer Yes

ii. Internal Selections (PWD) Answer Yes

GS-15 – benchmark is 28.47% and both Qualified Internal Applicants and Internal Selections fall below that mark with 20% and 

4% respectively. GS-14 – benchmark is 33.04% and the Qualified Internal Applicants falls below that mark with 4.38%. GS-13 – 

benchmark is 33.67% and both the Qualified Internal Applicants and Internal Selections fall below that mark with 3.46% and 

21.05% respectively.

2. Does your agency have a trigger involving PWTD among the qualified internal applicants and/or selectees for promotions 

to the senior grade levels? (The appropriate benchmarks are the relevant applicant pool for qualified internal applicants 

and the qualified applicant pool for selectees.) For non-GS pay plans, please use the approximate senior grade levels. If 

“yes”, describe the trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the applicant data is not available for your agency, and 

describe your plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. SES

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWTD) Answer No

ii. Internal Selections (PWTD) Answer No

b. Grade GS-15

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWTD) Answer No

ii. Internal Selections (PWTD) Answer No

c. Grade GS-14

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWTD) Answer Yes

ii. Internal Selections (PWTD) Answer Yes

d. Grade GS-13

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWTD) Answer Yes

ii. Internal Selections (PWTD) Answer Yes

GS-14 benchmark for PWTD is 3.27%. Both Internal Qualified Applicants and Selections fall below the mark with 1.81% and 0% 

respectively. GS-13 benchmark for PWTD is 2.72%. Both Internal Qualified Applicants and Selections fall below the mark with 

1.62% and 0% respectively.

3. Using the qualified applicant pool as the benchmark, does your agency have a trigger involving PWD among the new hires 

to the senior grade levels? For non-GS pay plans, please use the approximate senior grade levels. If “yes”, describe the 

trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the applicant data is not available for your agency, and describe your plan to 

provide the data in the text box.

a. New Hires to SES (PWD) Answer No
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 13

b. New Hires to GS-15 (PWD) Answer No

c. New Hires to GS-14 (PWD) Answer No

d. New Hires to GS-13 (PWD) Answer No

Due to EEOC’s rule of one, the GS-15 new hires percentage is not considered a trigger.

4. Using the qualified applicant pool as the benchmark, does your agency have a trigger involving PWTD among the new 

hires to the senior grade levels? For non-GS pay plans, please use the approximate senior grade levels. If “yes”, describe 

the trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the applicant data is not available for your agency, and describe your plan to 

provide the data in the text box.

a. New Hires to SES (PWTD) Answer No

b. New Hires to GS-15 (PWTD) Answer No

c. New Hires to GS-14 (PWTD) Answer No

d. New Hires to GS-13 (PWTD) Answer No

Due to EEOC’s rule of one, the GS-15 new hires percentage is not considered a trigger.

5. Does your agency have a trigger involving PWD among the qualified internal applicants and/or selectees for promotions to 

supervisory

positions? (The appropriate benchmarks are the relevant applicant pool for qualified internal applicants and the qualified 

applicant pool for selectees.) If “yes”, describe the trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the applicant data is not 

available for your agency, and describe your plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. Executives

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWD) Answer N/A

ii. Internal Selections (PWD) Answer N/A

b. Managers

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWD) Answer N/A

ii. Internal Selections (PWD) Answer N/A

c. Supervisors

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWD) Answer N/A

ii. Internal Selections (PWD) Answer N/A

We note that the HR data systems do not track employee level categories as asked for by this question.

6. Does your agency have a trigger involving PWTD among the qualified internal applicants and/or selectees for promotions 

to supervisory positions? (The appropriate benchmarks are the relevant applicant pool for qualified internal applicants and 

the qualified applicant pool for selectees.) If “yes”, describe the trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the applicant data 

is not available for your agency, and describe your plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. Executives

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWTD) Answer N/A
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 14

ii. Internal Selections (PWTD) Answer N/A

b. Managers

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWTD) Answer N/A

ii. Internal Selections (PWTD) Answer N/A

c. Supervisors

i. Qualified Internal Applicants (PWTD) Answer N/A

ii. Internal Selections (PWTD) Answer N/A

We note that the HR data systems do not track employee level categories as asked for by this question.

7. Using the qualified applicant pool as the benchmark, does your agency have a trigger involving PWD among the selectees 

for new hires to supervisory positions? If “yes”, describe the trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the applicant data is 

not available for your agency, and describe your plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. New Hires for Executives (PWD) Answer N/A

b. New Hires for Managers (PWD) Answer N/A

c. New Hires for Supervisors (PWD) Answer N/A

We note that the HR data systems do not track employee level categories as asked for by this question.

8. Using the qualified applicant pool as the benchmark, does your agency have a trigger involving PWTD among the 

selectees for new hires to supervisory positions? If “yes”, describe the trigger(s) in the text box. Select “n/a” if the 

applicant data is not available for your agency, and describe your plan to provide the data in the text box.

a. New Hires for Executives (PWTD) Answer N/A

b. New Hires for Managers (PWTD) Answer N/A

c. New Hires for Supervisors (PWTD) Answer N/A

We note that the HR data systems do not track employee level categories as asked for by this question.

Section VI: Plan to Improve Retention of Persons with Disabilities

To be model employer for persons with disabilities, agencies must have policies and programs in place to retain employees with 

disabilities. In this section, agencies should: (1) analyze workforce separation data to identify barriers retaining employees with 

disabilities; (2) describe efforts to ensure accessibility of technology and facilities; and (3) provide information on the reasonable 

accommodation program and workplace assistance services.

A. VOLUNTARY AND INVOLUNTARY SEPARATIONS

1. In this reporting period, did the agency convert all eligible Schedule A employees with a disability into the competitive 

service after two years of satisfactory service (5 C.F.R. § 213.3102(u)(6)(i))? If “no”, please explain why the agency did 

not convert all eligible Schedule A employees.

Answer Yes

The FLETC HCO completed all five of the Schedule A conversions required in FY 2021. HCO also completed three of the four 
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 15

missed Schedule A conversions in FY 2020. HCO will complete the last FY 2020 action in Pay Period 3 of 2022. HCO will 

continue its current process of notifying the appropriate supervisors of actions needed to process conversions three months before 

the conversion due date.

2. Using the inclusion rate as the benchmark, did the percentage of PWD among voluntary and involuntary separations 

exceed that of persons without disabilities? If “yes”, describe the trigger below.

a.Voluntary Separations (PWD) Answer No

b.Involuntary Separations (PWD) Answer No

The category of Involuntary Separations totaled one. That individual was a PWD. Using the EEOC’s rule of one, this is not a trigger.

Seperations Total # Reportable Disabilities %

Without Reportable 

Disabilities %

Permanent Workforce: Reduction in Force 0 0.00 0.00

Permanent Workforce: Removal 1 0.24 0.00

Permanent Workforce: Resignation 10 1.18 0.57

Permanent Workforce: Retirement 46 3.31 3.65

Permanent Workforce: Other Separations 15 1.89 0.80

Permanent Workforce: Total Separations 72 6.62 5.02

3. Using the inclusion rate as the benchmark, did the percentage of PWTD among voluntary and involuntary separations 

exceed that of persons without targeted disabilities? If “yes”, describe the trigger below.

a.Voluntary Separations (PWTD) Answer Yes

b.Involuntary Separations (PWTD) Answer No

The voluntary separation rates for PWD and PWTD exceeded that of non-PWD. There was one involuntary separation in FY 2021. 

That individual was a PWD and is not considered a trigger using the EEOC’s rule of one.

Seperations Total # Targeted Disabilities %

Without Targeted Disabilities 

%

Permanent Workforce: Reduction in Force 0 0.00 0.00

Permanent Workforce: Removal 1 0.00 0.08

Permanent Workforce: Resignation 10 1.96 0.72

Permanent Workforce: Retirement 46 3.92 3.53

Permanent Workforce: Other Separations 15 0.00 1.20

Permanent Workforce: Total Separations 72 5.88 5.53

4. If a trigger exists involving the separation rate of PWD and/or PWTD, please explain why they left the agency using exit 

interview results and other data sources.

There was no information provided in the exit interviews and other data to indicate that the separations were due to the employee’s 

disability status or failure to reasonably accommodate.

B. ACCESSIBILITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND FACILITIES

Pursuant to 29 CFR §1614.203(d)(4), federal agencies are required to inform applicants and employees of their rights under Section 

508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. § 794(b), concerning the accessibility of agency technology, and the Architectural 

Barriers Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 4151-4157), concerning the accessibility of agency facilities. In addition, agencies are required to 

inform individuals where to file complaints if other agencies are responsible for a violation.
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 16

1. Please provide the internet address on the agency’s public website for its notice explaining employees’ and applicants’ 

rights under Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, including a description of how to file a complaint.

https://www.fletc.gov/accessibility-statement

2. Please provide the internet address on the agency’s public website for its notice explaining employees’ and applicants’ 

rights under the

Architectural Barriers Act, including a description of how to file a complaint.

https://www.fletc.gov/accessibility-statement

3. Describe any programs, policies, or practices that the agency has undertaken, or plans on undertaking over the next fiscal 

year, designed to improve accessibility of agency facilities and/or technology.

The DPM worked with Facilities Management Division Architect and Office of Public Affairs in formulating a plan for enhancing 

accessibility of Building 680. Those efforts culminated in the construction of a sidewalk ramp and installation of a new door button 

for automatic opening of the front entrance. FLETC Student Services Division is collaborating with the Facilities Management 

Division on the construction of accessible dorms. These dorms meet Architectural Barriers Act Requirements. Design completion 

was at 95% at the end of FY 2021.

C. REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION PROGRAM

Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.203(d)(3), agencies must adopt, post on their public website, and make available to all job applicants 

and employees, reasonable accommodation procedures.

1. Please provide the average time frame for processing initial requests for reasonable accommodations during the reporting 

period. (Please do not include previously approved requests with repetitive accommodations, such as interpreting services.)

FLETC processed accommodation requests in an average of 16.44 days in FY 2021.

2. Describe the effectiveness of the policies, procedures, or practices to implement the agency’s reasonable accommodation 

program. Some examples of an effective program include timely processing requests, timely providing approved 

accommodations, conducting training for managers and supervisors, and monitoring accommodation requests for trends.

FLETC EEO Specialists briefed all new employees (supervisors and non-supervisors) on the reasonable accommodation process 

during new employee orientations. The Disability Program Manager provided Reasonable Accommodation training during FLETC 

New Supervisor Training Program, as well as workshops for both supervisory and non-supervisory employees. In FY 2021, 85.7% 

of employee Reasonable Accommodation Requests were processed timely, with an average of 13.7 days. FLETC’s Chief of Staff 

approved FLETC’s Reasonable Accommodation Directive on September 14, 2021. This directive provides detailed guidance for the 

processing of requests and was published to the workforce on September 15, 2021. The FLETC team approach to processing 

requests for Reasonable Accommodation has demonstrated that this approach is effective in the accommodations provided, the 

processing time average, and the knowledge sharing between the HCO, Office of Chief Counsel and the EEO Office. The Student 

and Employee Disability and Accessibility (SEDA) Work Group consists of representatives from various divisions and offices at 

FLETC whose mission includes responsibility for adherence to the Rehabilitation Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. This 

work group falls under the auspices of the FLETC SRDI Council. The offices include the Facilities Management Division, IT 

Business Management Division, Student Services Division, Security Management Operations, HCO, End-User Computing Support 

Branch, Evaluation and Analysis Branch, Critical Incident Stress Management Office, and the EEO Office. This group has been 

very successful in providing information to the FLETC workforce on FLETC Connect on topics such as Schedule A Hiring, 

Veterans Hiring, Agency Responsibilities under the Rehabilitation Act, Reasonable Accommodation and Accessibility. The 

network established by SEDA was directly instrumental in facilitating requests for accommodation, especially in the areas of 

technology and accessibility. Lastly, FLETC celebrated National Disability Employment Awareness Month (NDEAM) in October. 

The DPM participated on a work group tasked with planning FLETC’s observance of NDEAM. Managers in Charleston and 

Glynco led efforts. Due to COVID pandemic working conditions, the work group opted to publish articles on FLETC Connect on 
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 17

topics such as Schedule A, Reasonable Accommodation, Veteran Hiring Authorities and Architectural Accessibility. The HCO 

SRDID Branch published the President’s Proclamation on NDEAM and an article on the history of NDEAM on FLETCConnect.

D. PERSONAL ASSISTANCE SERVICES ALLOWING EMPLOYEES TO PARTICIPATE IN THE 

WORKPLACE

Pursuant to 29 CFR §1614.203(d)(5), federal agencies, as an aspect of affirmative action, are required to provide personal 

assistance services (PAS) to employees who need them because of a targeted disability, unless doing so would impose an undue 

hardship on the agency.

Describe the effectiveness of the policies, procedures, or practices to implement the PAS requirement. Some examples of 

an effective program include timely processing requests for PAS, timely providing approved services, conducting training 

for managers and supervisors, and monitoring PAS requests for trends.

Requests from employees with targeted disabilities who require personal assistance services (PAS) will be processed under the 

FLETC reasonable accommodation policy. In FY 2021, there were no requests for personal assistance services.

Section VII: EEO Complaint and Findings Data

A. EEO COMPLAINT DATA INVOLVING HARASSMENT

1. During the last fiscal year, did a higher percentage of PWD file a formal EEO complaint alleging harassment, as compared 

to the governmentwide average?

Answer No

2. During the last fiscal year, did any complaints alleging harassment based on disability status result in a finding of 

discrimination or a settlement agreement?

Answer No

3. If the agency had one or more findings of discrimination alleging harassment based on disability status during the last 

fiscal year, please describe the corrective measures taken by the agency.

There were no findings of discrimination.

B. EEO COMPLAINT DATA INVOLVING REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION

1. During the last fiscal year, did a higher percentage of PWD file a formal EEO complaint alleging failure to provide a 

reasonable

accommodation, as compared to the government-wide average?

Answer No

2. During the last fiscal year, did any complaints alleging failure to provide reasonable accommodation result in a finding of 

discrimination or a settlement agreement?

Answer No

3. If the agency had one or more findings of discrimination involving the failure to provide a reasonable accommodation 

during the last fiscal year, please describe the corrective measures taken by the agency.

There were no findings of discrimination.

Section VIII: Identification and Removal of Barriers
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 18

Element D of MD-715 requires agencies to conduct a barrier analysis when a trigger suggests that a policy, procedure, or practice 

may be impeding the employment opportunities of a protected EEO group.

1. Has the agency identified any barriers (policies, procedures, and/or practices) that affect employment opportunities for 

PWD and/or PWTD?

Answer No

2. Has the agency established a plan to correct the barrier(s) involving PWD and/or PWTD?

Answer N/A

3. Identify each trigger and plan to remove the barrier(s), including the identified barrier(s), objective(s), responsible 

official(s), planned activities, and, where applicable, accomplishments
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 19

STATEMENT OF 

CONDITION THAT WAS 

A TRIGGER FOR A 

POTENTIAL BARRIER:

Provide a brief narrative 

describing the condition at 

issue.

How was the condition 

recognized as a potential 

barrier?

Other

Workforce Data Table - B1

CAREER DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES FY 2020: The benchmark for PWD is 28.64%. 

Triggers exist for PWD in the application rate for all career development programs. No triggers 

exist for PWD in selections as all applicants were selected. The benchmark for PWTD is 3.73%. 

Triggers exist for PWTD in the application rate for all career development programs. No triggers 

exist for PWTD in selections as all applicants were selected. FLETC will continue to market career 

development programs to all employees, including those with disabilities. FY 2019: • In FY 2019, 

triggers exist for PWD among the applicants (16.67% for the Mentoring Program and 14.29% for 

the Detail Program), in comparison to 26.37% for the relevant applicant pool. • Triggers exist for 

PWTD in the Mentoring Program. There were no PWTD applicants for this program.

Y

N

STATEMENT OF 

BARRIER GROUPS:

STATEMENT OF 

IDENTIFIED BARRIER:

Provide a succinct statement 

of the agency policy, 

procedure

or practice that has been 

determined to be the barrier 

of the 

undesired condition.

Barrier Group

People with Disabilities

People with Targeted Disabilities

Source of the Trigger:

Specific Workforce Data 

Table:

Barrier Analysis Process 

Completed?:

Barrier(s) Identified?:

Barrier Name Description of Policy, Procedure, or Practice

Undetermined Continue to review policies, procedures and practices to identify any 

barriers for career development opportunities.

Objective(s) and Dates for EEO Plan

Date 

Initiated

Target Date Sufficient 

Funding / 

Staffing?

Date 

Modified

Date 

Completed

Objective Description

07/08/2020 09/30/2021 Yes To determine if barriers exist to PWD and PWTD in 

the application process for the Mentoring Program.

Responsible Official(s)

Title Name Standards Address The Plan?

EEO Officer John Weaver Yes

HCO Officer Candice Porter Yes

Planned Activities Toward Completion of Objective

Target Date Planned Activities Sufficient

Staffing &

Funding?

Modified

Date

Completion

Date

09/30/2020 Review the Mentor and Detail program policies and 

practices for barriers for PWD and PWTD.

Yes 05/11/2020

09/30/2020 Look at the marketing and announcement process for the 

Mentor and Detail programs and determine if efficient.

Yes 05/11/2020

09/30/2020 Identify other Career Development opportunities. Yes 01/17/2020
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 20

Report of Accomplishments

Fiscal Year Accomplishment

2020 FLETC Developmental Assignment Program opportunities were announced on FLETCconnect under Career 

Development. Additionally, the announcement was emailed to staff for their awareness.

In FY 2020, training opportunities for staff included cross-training opportunities through the Developmental 

Assignment Program for 10 employees, of which five or 50.00% were from a LPG, two or 20.00% were 

Persons with Disability (PWD) and one or 10.00% was a Person with a Targeted Disability (PWTD). 

Throughout the year, the Workforce Development Branch announced opportunities to participate in mentoring 

programs on FLETCconnect, emails, staff meetings and flyers. In FY 2020, 41 FLETC employees participated 

in five different mentoring programs, (The FLETC Formal Mentoring Program, The FLETC 8-hour 

Cornerstone Mentoring, The DHS Disability Mentoring Program, The DHS Women in Law Enforcement 

Mentoring Program, and The DHS Formal Mentoring Program). Of the 41 employees, (23 mentees and 18 

mentors), ten or 24.39% were PWD and one or 2.44% was a PWTD.

Other Career Development opportunities include the FLETC Milestone and Foundations Programs. In FY 

2020, in the FLETC Milestone Program, there were 19 participants, of which five or 26.32% were PWD. In 

the FLETC Foundations Program, there were seventeen participants, of which 11.77% were PWD. 

Additionally, FLETC included five participants from its participating organizations (Treasury Inspector 

General for Tax Administration and U.S. Customs and Border Protection) in order to take a collaborative 

approach to employee development.
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 21

STATEMENT OF 

CONDITION THAT WAS 

A TRIGGER FOR A 

POTENTIAL BARRIER:

Provide a brief narrative 

describing the condition at 

issue.

How was the condition 

recognized as a potential 

barrier?

Workforce Data (if so identify the table)

Workforce Data Table - B9

AWARDS FY 2021: Using the inclusion rate as the benchmark (Table B9-2), FLETC identified 

triggers involving the percentage of PWTD (22.73%), which is 6.22% lower than Non-PWTD in 

the category of Time off awards. Cash awards show PWD (123.394%, which is -4.36% lower than 

Non-PWD) and PWTD (125.00%, which is -2.75% lower than Non-PTWD) for Cash awards. 

Using the inclusion rate as the benchmark (Table B92), FLETC identified no triggers involving the 

percentage of PWD and PWTD in the category of Quality Step Increases. FY 2020: Using the 

inclusion rate as the benchmark (Table B9-1), FLETC identified triggers involving the percentage 

of PWD (24.02%, which is -7.56% lower than Non-PWD) and PWTD (17.07%, which is -14.51% 

lower than Non-PWTD) who received Time off awards; and PWD (125.81%, which is -8.47% 

lower that Non-PWD) and PWTD (134.15%, which is -0.13% lower than Non-PTWD) for Cash 

awards. Using the inclusion rate as the benchmark (Table B9-1), FLETC identified triggers 

involving of the percentage of PWTD (2.44%, which is -2.18% lower than Non-PWTD) who 

received Quality step increases. FY 2019: Using the inclusion rate as the benchmark (Table B9-1), 

FLETC identified triggers involving the percentage of PWD (24.02%, which is -7.56% lower than 

Non-PWD) and PWTD (17.07%, which is -14.51% lower than Non-PWTD) who received Time off 

awards; and PWD (125.81%, which is -8.47% lower that Non-PWD) and PWTD (134.15%, which 

is -0.13% lower than Non-PTWD) for Cash awards. Using the inclusion rate as the benchmark 

(Table B9-1), FLETC identified triggers involving of the percentage of PWTD (2.44%, which is 

-2.18% lower than Non-PWTD) who received Quality step increases.

Y

N

STATEMENT OF 

BARRIER GROUPS:

STATEMENT OF 

IDENTIFIED BARRIER:

Provide a succinct statement 

of the agency policy, 

procedure

or practice that has been 

determined to be the barrier 

of the 

undesired condition.

Barrier Group

People with Disabilities

People with Targeted Disabilities

Source of the Trigger:

Specific Workforce Data 

Table:

Barrier Analysis Process 

Completed?:

Barrier(s) Identified?:

Barrier Name Description of Policy, Procedure, or Practice

Undetermined Continue to review policies, procedures and practices to identify 

any barriers for awards.

Objective(s) and Dates for EEO Plan

Date 

Initiated

Target Date Sufficient 

Funding / 

Staffing?

Date 

Modified

Date 

Completed

Objective Description

11/04/2019 11/04/2022 Yes The EEO Office and HR will work in concert to 

ensure detailed workforce data is available to EEO for 

in-depth barrier analysis.

Responsible Official(s)

Title Name Standards Address The Plan?

EEO Officer John Weaver Yes

HCO Officer Candice Porter Yes
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 22

Planned Activities Toward Completion of Objective

Target Date Planned Activities Sufficient

Staffing &

Funding?

Modified

Date

Completion

Date

06/30/2020 Request HCO provide quarterly detail data for award and 

recognitions, or provide training to EEO staff.

Yes 09/15/2020

09/30/2020 Perform trend analysis of detail PWD workforce data. Yes 09/30/2021 09/30/2021

09/30/2020 Breakout trend analysis for awards and recognitions by 

Directorate and share with Senior Managers for 

awareness.

Yes 01/31/2021 09/30/2021

09/30/2022 Create new baseline of awards with updated FY 2021 

PWD rates.

Yes

09/30/2022 Set updated baseline using the updated FY 2021 veteran 

preference codes for PWD for awards and recognitions 

by Directorate and share with Senior Managers for 

awareness.

Yes

Report of Accomplishments

Fiscal Year Accomplishment

2020 Request HCO provide quarterly detail data for award and recognitions, or provide training to EEO staff. 

Update: The EEO Specialist was given access to detail data for awards and recognitions through NFC 

Reporting Center. 

Perform trend analysis of detail PWD workforce data. Update: Detail data for awards and recognitions have 

been pulled for FY 2016 through FY 2019. PWD and PWTD inclusion rate in all level of awards falls below 

their comparator from 2017 through 2019. FY 2020 data tables depict that trend did not continue in cash award 

categories $500-under, $2000-2999 and $3000-3999. Time off Awards also saw a change in participation in the 

1-10 Hours and 21-30 Hours. The upward swing is worth noting and will be included in the Departmental 

summaries. In FY 2021, FLETC will continue to evaluate the FY 2020 data against baselines that were 

established for FY 2019. Analysis of all awards given in FY 2019 showed that 99.91% of employees received 

at least one award. That number breaks down to 14.38% awards were to people with disabilities and 85.61% to 

those identifying no disability. Additional findings will be identified in the FY 2021 action planning. 

Breakout trend analysis for awards and recognitions by Directorate and share with Senior Managers for 

awareness. Update: FLETC has pulled the awards and recognitions detail data, is currently sorting it by 

organization, and will distribute to senior management for their awareness during FY 2021.

2021 Analysis of FY 2020 award data by Division was completed and provided to Senior Management which 

established a baseline for an ongoing data breakout through FY 2022. A trend analysis will be completed at that 

time to determine if barriers exist. Looking at all cash awards or time off awards as an aggregate gives only a 

partial picture. However, additional veteran codes are included in the PWD and PWTD data received from 

DHS in FY 2021. Baselines will need to be updated based on this new information.
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 23

STATEMENT OF 

CONDITION THAT WAS 

A TRIGGER FOR A 

POTENTIAL BARRIER:

Provide a brief narrative 

describing the condition at 

issue.

How was the condition 

recognized as a potential 

barrier?

Workforce Data (if so identify the table)

Workforce Data Table - B7

PROMOTIONS FY 2021: There were no triggers for PWD among the selectees for promotion at 

grades GS-13 and GS-14. The percentage of PWTD among the selectees for promotion to the 

GS-13 grade level (0.00%) fell below their benchmark. There were no triggers for PWD among the 

new hires at grades GS-13 and GS-14. and GS-15. There were no triggers for PWTD among the 

new hires at grades GS 13 and GS-14. There is no trigger identified for PWTD new hires at the 

GS-15 (0.00%) grade level due to EEOC’s rule of one. FY 2020: The percentage of PWD among 

the selectees for promotion at grades GS-13 (0.00%) and GS-14 (0.00%) fell below their 

benchmark. The percentage of PWTD among the selectees for promotion for grades GS-13 (0.00%) 

and GS-14 (0.00%) fell below their benchmarks. The percentage of PWD among the new hires at 

grades GS-13 (6.90%), GS-14 (0.00%) and GS-15 (0.00%) fell below their benchmarks. The 

percentage of PWTD among the new hires at grades GS 13 (3.45%), GS-14 (0.00%) and GS-15 

(0.00%) fell below their benchmarks. FY 2019: The percentage of PWD among the selectees for 

promotion at grades GS-13 (0.00%) and GS-14 (0.00%) fell below their benchmark. The percentage 

of PWTD among the selectees for promotion for grades GS-13 (0.00%) and GS-14 (0.00%) fell 

below their benchmarks. The percentage of PWD among the new hires at grades GS-13 (6.90%), 

GS-14 (0.00%) and GS-15 (0.00%) fell below their benchmarks. The percentage of PWTD among 

the new hires at grades GS 13 (3.45%), GS-14 (0.00%) and GS-15 (0.00%) fell below their 

benchmarks.

Y

N

STATEMENT OF 

BARRIER GROUPS:

STATEMENT OF 

IDENTIFIED BARRIER:

Provide a succinct statement 

of the agency policy, 

procedure

or practice that has been 

determined to be the barrier 

of the 

undesired condition.

Barrier Group

People with Disabilities

People with Targeted Disabilities

Source of the Trigger:

Specific Workforce Data 

Table:

Barrier Analysis Process 

Completed?:

Barrier(s) Identified?:

Barrier Name Description of Policy, Procedure, or Practice

Unidentifed Continue review of policies, procedures and practices for 

promotions.

Objective(s) and Dates for EEO Plan

Date 

Initiated

Target Date Sufficient 

Funding / 

Staffing?

Date 

Modified

Date 

Completed

Objective Description

11/04/2019 11/04/2022 Yes EEO and HCO will work toward identifying possible 

barriers to the external hiring and internal promotions 

of PWD and PWTD. Analysis of detailed hiring and 

promotion data will be the initial focus.

Responsible Official(s)

Title Name Standards Address The Plan?

HCO Officer Candice Porter Yes

EEO Officer John Weaver Yes
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 24

Planned Activities Toward Completion of Objective

Target Date Planned Activities Sufficient

Staffing &

Funding?

Modified

Date

Completion

Date

06/30/2020 Work with HR to gain access and receive training for 

pulling detailed work force data.

Yes 04/10/2020

06/30/2020 Work with HR to determine appropriate recruitment data 

and development of metrics.

Yes 09/30/2021 04/23/2021

09/30/2020 Perform data analysis to determine where hiring is 

occurring, series, grade, etc.

Yes 09/30/2021

09/30/2020 Perform data analysis including additional veteran 

preference codes to determine where hiring is occurring, 

series, grade, etc.

Yes 06/01/2022

Report of Accomplishments

Fiscal Year Accomplishment

2020 Work with HR to gain access and receive training for pulling detailed work force data. The EEO Specialist was 

given access to detail data through NFC Reporting Center. 

Work with HR to determine appropriate recruitment data and development of metrics. Update: Although due 

to the pandemic most of the targeted events were cancelled, for external new hires, FLETC was able to pursue 

diverse recruitment initiatives by sending vacancy announcements to targeted professional law enforcement, 

cultural and veterans organizations through the Diversity Initiative Notification in Monster Government 

Solutions. Additionally, we were able to participate virtually in the Navy Tri-Base Career Fair, DHS is Hiring 

Law Enforcement Virtual webinar, and Warriors to the Workforce Veteran’s Summit. FLETC DPM met with 

Ft. Stewart Wounded Warrior Program officials and briefed them on Schedule A Hiring Authority, usajobs.gov 

website, and reasonable accommodation. A FLETC Training Division representative participated in U.S. Army 

Garrison Fort Stewart Wounded Warrior Program Town Hall in November 2019 at which time he spoke of 

career opportunities at FLETC and shared his experience as an individual with a targeted disability working as 

an GS-1801 Law Enforcement Instructor at FLETC. 

Perform data analysis to determine where hiring is occurring, series, grade, etc. Update: Detail data for PWD/

PWTD new hires have been pulled for FY 2015 through FY 2020. In FY 2021, FLETC will continue to work 

to provide a baseline for trend analysis.

2021 Updated data for PWD reveals there are no triggers for PWD or PWTD in external hires to the GS-13 or GS-14 

grade levels in FY 2021. There continues to be a trigger for PWTD in internal promotions at the GS-13 and 

GS-14 grade levels. Although this deficiency qualifies under the EEOC’s rule of one, EEO will continue to 

monitor this exclusion to determine if possible barriers exist. 

The HR Specialist provided EEO structured reports to include diversity on the hiring certificates so they can be 

assessed for barrier analysis. EEO will continue to work with HCO regarding appropriate metrics.
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 25

STATEMENT OF 

CONDITION THAT WAS 

A TRIGGER FOR A 

POTENTIAL BARRIER:

Provide a brief narrative 

describing the condition at 

issue.

How was the condition 

recognized as a potential 

barrier?

Workforce Data (if so identify the table)

Workforce Data Table - B1

SEPARATIONS FY 2021: Using the inclusion rate, triggers exist for PWD (3.23%) who 

involuntarily separated from the agency, as compared to the rate of persons without disabilities 

(1.80%). FY 2020: Using the inclusion rate, triggers exist for PWD (3.23%) who involuntarily 

separated from the agency, as compared to the rate of persons without disabilities (1.80%). FY 

2019: Using the inclusion rate, triggers exist for PWD (3.23%) who involuntarily separated from 

the agency, as compared to the rate of persons without disabilities (1.80%).

Y

N

STATEMENT OF 

BARRIER GROUPS:

STATEMENT OF 

IDENTIFIED BARRIER:

Provide a succinct statement 

of the agency policy, 

procedure

or practice that has been 

determined to be the barrier 

of the 

undesired condition.

Barrier Group

People with Disabilities

Source of the Trigger:

Specific Workforce Data 

Table:

Barrier Analysis Process 

Completed?:

Barrier(s) Identified?:

Barrier Name Description of Policy, Procedure, or Practice

Objective(s) and Dates for EEO Plan

Date 

Initiated

Target Date Sufficient 

Funding / 

Staffing?

Date 

Modified

Date 

Completed

Objective Description

11/04/2019 11/04/2020 Yes 02/04/2022 To perform a trend analysis to identify if any barriers 

exist in the separation rate of PWD.

Responsible Official(s)

Title Name Standards Address The Plan?

EEO Officer John Weaver Yes

HCO Officer Candice Porter Yes

Planned Activities Toward Completion of Objective

Target Date Planned Activities Sufficient

Staffing &

Funding?

Modified

Date

Completion

Date

06/30/2020 Conduct further analysis on nature of action codes for 

other separations.

Yes 04/16/2020

09/30/2020 Identify any trends and/or barriers. Yes 02/04/2022
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 26

Report of Accomplishments

Fiscal Year Accomplishment

2020 An EEO Specialist has access to systems that contain employee data in singular caches. The data for each 

analysis point is pulled separately and then compiled by hand to provide the basis for substantive analysis. 

FLETC continues to gather Separations data for prior years to complete the trend analysis and make a 

determination if barriers exist regarding the separation rate of PWD and PWTD.

2021 Initial analysis of FY 2020 separations for PWD and PWTD did not identify barriers in their separation rates. 

Additional veteran preference codes are now included in the number of employees counted as PWD that could 

result in higher separations than previously reviewed. After review of the FY 2021 data tables, PWD depict no 

triggers in either the voluntary or involuntary separation category. A trigger has been identified for PWTD in 

the voluntary separation category based on the updated data.
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 27

STATEMENT OF 

CONDITION THAT WAS 

A TRIGGER FOR A 

POTENTIAL BARRIER:

Provide a brief narrative 

describing the condition at 

issue.

How was the condition 

recognized as a potential 

barrier?

Workforce Data (if so identify the table)

Workforce Data Table - B6

PROGRESSION TOWARDS GOALS (RECRUITMENT AND HIRING) FY 2021: In comparison 

to the qualified applicant benchmark (9.04%), a trigger does exist for PWD (8.51%) among the 

qualified external applicants for the GS-1801 series. In comparison to the benchmark for PWD 

(27.47%), a trigger does exist for PWD (12.00%) among the qualified internal applicants for the 

GS-1801 series. FY 2020: In comparison to the qualified applicant benchmark (9.04%), a trigger 

does exist for PWD (8.51%) among the qualified external applicants for the GS-1801 series. In 

comparison to the benchmark for PWD (27.47%), a trigger does exist for PWD (12.00%) among the 

qualified internal applicants for the GS-1801 series. FY 2019: Table B6-1, although the GS-1801 

permanent workforce, PWD (27.47%) and PWTD (3.65%) exceed their 12% and 2% goal, new 

hires fall below in comparison to applicant benchmarks.

Y

N

STATEMENT OF 

BARRIER GROUPS:

STATEMENT OF 

IDENTIFIED BARRIER:

Provide a succinct statement 

of the agency policy, 

procedure

or practice that has been 

determined to be the barrier 

of the 

undesired condition.

Barrier Group

People with Disabilities

Source of the Trigger:

Specific Workforce Data 

Table:

Barrier Analysis Process 

Completed?:

Barrier(s) Identified?:

Barrier Name Description of Policy, Procedure, or Practice

Unidentified Continue to review policies, procedures and practices for current 

triggers to ensure there are no barriers.

Objective(s) and Dates for EEO Plan

Date 

Initiated

Target Date Sufficient 

Funding / 

Staffing?

Date 

Modified

Date 

Completed

Objective Description

10/01/2019 09/30/2022 Yes To identify if barriers exist in the recruitment and 

hiring process for the 1801 series.

Responsible Official(s)

Title Name Standards Address The Plan?

Branch Chief, Strategic Recruitment 

Diversity Inclusion and Development

Brenda M. Lloyd Yes

Human Capital Officer Candice Porter Yes

EEO Officer John C. Weaver Yes

Planned Activities Toward Completion of Objective

Target Date Planned Activities Sufficient

Staffing &

Funding?

Modified

Date

Completion

Date

06/30/2020 Initiate analysis of recruitment processes for 1801 series. Yes 08/31/2020

09/30/2020 Work with HR to initiate an internal metric collection 

tool to better track the hiring process from advertisement 

to hire.

Yes 09/30/2021 04/23/2021
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 28

Planned Activities Toward Completion of Objective

Target Date Planned Activities Sufficient

Staffing &

Funding?

Modified

Date

Completion

Date

09/30/2020 Examine physical requirements for GS-1801 positions. Yes 01/29/2021

09/30/2020 Work with FLETC’s new Data Driven Management 

office statistician to request detailed data on exit surveys 

to include ERI and gender information to analyze for any 

indicators of why Hispanic or Latino males, White males 

and females separation rates exceed their participation 

rates.

Yes 01/27/2020

Report of Accomplishments

Fiscal Year Accomplishment

2020 Initiate analysis of recruitment processes for 1801 series. Update: Although due to the pandemic most of the 

targeted events were cancelled, FLETC was able to pursue recruitment initiatives for the GS-1801 series by 

sending vacancy announcements to targeted professional law enforcement, cultural and veterans organizations 

through the Diversity Initiative Notification in Monster Government Solutions. Additionally, we were able to 

participate virtually in the Navy Tri-Base Career Fair, DHS is Hiring Law Enforcement Virtual webinar, and 

Warriors to the Workforce Veterans Summit. FLETC DPM met with Ft. Stewart Wounded Warrior Program 

officials and briefed them on Schedule A Hiring Authority and usajobs.gov website and reasonable 

accommodation. A FLETC Training Division representative participated in U.S. Army Garrison Fort Stewart 

Wounded Warrior Program Town Hall in November 2019 at which time he spoke of career opportunities at 

FLETC and shared his experience as an individual with a targeted disability working as an GS-1801 Law 

Enforcement Instructor at FLETC.

Work with HR to initiate an internal metric collection tool to better track the hiring process from advertisement 

to hire. Update: In FY 2020, Monster Government Solutions worked to implement updates on applicant flow 

data. Pending this implementation, FLETC amended this planned activity for the EEO Specialist to work an 

overall five year GS-1801 trend analysis on ERI and gender participation, New Hires (internal and external), 

and Separation rates. The EEO Specialist will continue the trend analysis in FY 2021 to examine GS-1801 

individuals with disabilities. 

Examine physical requirements for GS-1801 positions. Update: Physical requirements for each of the GS-1801 

instructor positions is defined by the hiring manager when the position description is being created. The PDs 

are reviewed every time they are submitted and now that we are using Monster, PDs have a review cycle of 3 

years.

2021 HCO provided EEO access to an ad hoc report from Monster Government Solutions with hiring demographics 

that include the applicant status. Additionally, EEO participated in a Monster Government Solutions meeting 

regarding upcoming Monster Analytic Enhancements for all EEOC Application Data Table Reports. 

The Recruitment process was moved to the new HCO SRDID Branch in FY 2020. Many recruitment events 

were not held or were not scheduled due to the ongoing pandemic. FLETC was able to pursue diversity 

recruitment initiatives by sending vacancy announcements to targeted professional law enforcement, as well as 

cultural and veterans’ organizations, through the Diversity Initiative Notification in Monster Government 

Solutions. FLETC did participate in 19 recruitment and outreach events during FY 2021, which included both 

virtual and in-person attendance. Four of the events were targeted to People with Disabilities and Veterans. 

The HCO continues to notify targeted organizations of vacancies within the FLETC organization.

4. Please explain the factor(s) that prevented the agency from timely completing any of the planned activities.

PROGRESSION TOWARDS GOALS (RECRUITMENT AND HIRING) Planned Activity: Work with HR to initiate an internal 

metric collection tool to better track the hiring process from advertisement to hire. Factors: In FY 2020, FLETC was notified that 

Monster Government Solutions was in the process of implementing an update to their systems that will improve the reporting 
DHS Federal Law Enforcement 

Training Center

FY 2021

Page 29

capabilities of applicant flow data. The EEO Specialist took that time to conduct trend analysis on the GS-1801 series to further 

identify applicant trends. Once the updated reporting features are finalized, the EEO Specialist will work along with the newly 

formed FLETC Diversity Office and the Human Capital Office to identify any areas of the hiring process for GS-1801’s that are not 

identified in the new reporting feature in Monster Government Solutions.

5. For the planned activities that were completed, please describe the actual impact of those activities toward eliminating the 

barrier(s).

PROGRESSION TOWARDS GOALS (RECRUITMENT AND HIRING) Although no barriers have been identified thus far, the 

EEO Specialist, and the newly formed FLETC Strategic Recruitment, Diversity, Inclusion, and Development Office will assess 

GS-1801 applicant trend analysis against the identified recruitment processes for recommendations of future targeted recruitment 

efforts for women and members of minority racial or ethnic groups to include individuals with disabilities. AWARDS Impacts will 

be measured starting in FY 2021 during ongoing trend analysis.

6. If the planned activities did not correct the trigger(s) and/or barrier(s), please describe how the agency intends to improve 

the plan for the next fiscal year.

N/A