alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 510 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4000 

[Report No. 118–223] 

To reaffirm the applicability of the Indian Reorganization Act to the Lytton 

Rancheria of California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2024 

Mr. PADILLA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 

Reported by Mr. SCHATZ, without amendment 

A BILL 

To reaffirm the applicability of the Indian Reorganization 

Act to the Lytton Rancheria of California, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA LAND RE4 AFFIRMATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, the Lytton Rancheria of California is subject 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4000 RS

1 to the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘In2 dian Reorganization Act’’) (48 Stat. 984, chapter 576; 25 

3 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.), and the Secretary of the Interior 

4 may acquire and take into trust land for the benefit of 

5 the Lytton Rancheria of California pursuant to section 5 

6 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 5108). 

7 (b) LAND TO BE MADE PART OF THE RESERVA8 TION.—Land taken into trust pursuant to subsection (a) 

9 shall be— 

10 (1) part of the reservation of the Lytton 

11 Rancheria of California; and 

12 (2) administered in accordance with the laws 

13 and regulations generally applicable to property held 

14 in trust by the United States for an Indian Tribe. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 510 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4000 

[Report No. 118–223] 

A BILL 

To reaffirm the applicability of the Indian Reorgafornia, and for other purposes. nization Act to the Lytton Rancheria of CaliSEPTEMBER 12, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
April 14, 1948

No. 52272.

protest 913614-G.

#### Charles Bruning Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Abstract 52215. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 53536.

protest 139973-K (Tampa).

#### Imports, Inc. *v.*United States,

*158Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEPHEN MENZIES,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1009 DFL KJM PS

vs.

MARY MUSE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 72-302(c)(21).

On September 26, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. No

objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01009-DFL -KJM Document 87 Filed 01/31/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 26, 2005, are adopted in

full; and

2. Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees is denied.

DATED: 1/31/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01009-DFL -KJM Document 87 Filed 01/31/06 Page 2 of 2
DECLARATION OF TRUST

 

 

 

I, Carolyne Vera Sing, hereby declare that the mineral claims described below and are registered in my name with the Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources for the Province of British Columbia are held by me in trust for the benefit of Sillenger Exploration Corp.

 

 

Mineral Claims:

 


	
	Tenure Number

	
	Claim Number

	
	Number

	
	Good to Date

	
	Status

	
	Area


	
	585682

	
	Bulkley 1

	
	208930 100%

	
	2009/June/03

	
	GOOD

	
	294.4642


	
	585683

	
	Bulkley 2

	
	208930 100%

	
	2009/June/03

	
	GOOD

	
	310.8017


	
	585685

	
	Bulkley 3

	
	208930 100%

	
	2009/June/03

	
	GOOD

	
	343.6187






 

 

Dated the 11th of June,
2008

 

 

/s/ Carolyne Vera
Sing

Carolyne Vera Sing
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Northwest Airlines, Inc., Delta Airlines, Inc. 

AirTran Airways Inc., Continental Airlines, 

Inc., Southwest Airlines, Inc. 

Complainants / Appellees 

Indianapolis Airport Authority, Indianapolis 

International Airport, BAA-Indianapolis 

Respondents / Appellants 

en 

- a 

J 3 

> ^ S 

Docket No. 16-07-04 

CO 

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME 

This matter is before the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for FederallyAssisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules of Practice). Pursuant 

to the Rules of Practice, Section 16.11 (a), the date by which the Final Agency Decision 

will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to May 14, 2009. 

An extension of time is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination 

in this case. 

^•^ -

Catherine M. Lang 

Acting Associate Adi 

for Airports 

I Datfe 

istrator 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that on m 2 5 I caused to be placed in the 

United States mail (first class mail, postage paid) a true copy of the Notice of Extension 

of Time addressed to: 

For Complainants 

Robert E. Cohn 

Jonathan L. Abram 

Patrick R. Rizzi 

HOGAN & HARTSON, L.L.P. 

555 Thirteenth Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Lorraine B. Halloway 

CROWELL & MORING LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Counsel for Continental Airlines, Inc. 

Brian Mattingly, 

Regional Director Airport Affairs 

Gary Bunce, 

Assistant General Counsel 

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC. 

2700 Lone Oak Parkway 

Eagan,MN 55121 

Robert W. Kneisley 

Associate General Counsel 

Leslie Abbott 

Attorney 

SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO. 

1901 L Street, NW, Suite 640 

Washington, DC 20036 

Joseph Zang 

Assistant General Counsel 

Rebecca Bays, 

General Attorney 

DELTA AIR LINES INC 

1030 Delta Boulevard 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

Richard P. Magurno 

Senior Vice President & General Counsel 

AIR TRAN AIRWAYS, INC 

9955 AirTran Boulevard 

Orlanda, FA 32827 

Thomas Newton Boiling 

Managing Attorney, Regulatory Affairs 

CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC 

P.O. Box 4607 - HQSLG 

Houston, TX 77210 
For Respondents 

Pablo O. Nuesch 

Jeffrey A. Schwarz 

SPIEGEL & MCDIARMID LLP 

1333 New Hampshire Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20036 

Robert A. Duncan 

Airport Director 

Indianapolis Airport Authority 

Indianapolis International Airport 

2500 South High School Road, Suite 100 

Indianapolis, IN 46241-4943 

Copy to FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket 

:ita&rfght 

Offii^o^ off A Airport Compliance 

and Field Operations
Supporting Local Jobs

Advanced Technology

B&W: WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTIONS

SOLID WASTE AUTHORITY OF PALM BEACH COUNTY RENEWABLE ENERGY PARK

Waste-to-Energy

(WtE) is a “Clean,

Reliable, Renewable 

source of Energy.”

 — EPA

WtE generates 

electricity “with 

less environmental 

impact than

almost any source 

of electricity.”

 —EPA

SOURCE: EPA

Municipal Solid Waste

combustion produces lower 

CO2 emissions than fossil 

fuel sources

Curbing CO2 Emissions

Air Emissions (Pounds per Megawatt Hour)

Oil

1,672

Natural 

Gas

1,135

Coal

2,249

MSW

1,016

Powering Community Homes

CLEANER

 EMISSIONS*



COMBUSTION

EFFICIENCY

B&W’s cutting-edge WtE

technology sets the standard

for highest efficiency and

lowest emissions in the U.S.

200+FULLTIME

JOBS*

*FACILITY #2 ONLY



INCLUDES DIOXINS AND FURANS, ACID GASES AND HEAVY METALS

*AT CAPACITY

85,000* HOMES

1,795,000* TONS

OF MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE

*AT CAPACITY

= 2,500 FL Homes

90–99%

REMOVAL

99%
# IRC Handouts 04 23 19

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts 04 23 19

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold" DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts 04 23 19
Part 1, Section V: USSGL Crosswalks to Standard

External Reports

This section includes crosswalks for use in fiscal 2017 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map USSGL

accounts to external reports in accordance with current reporting guidance from the Office of Management

and Budget (OMB), the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB), and the Bureau of the

Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service).

Each report crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or

column on the reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This

subsidiary information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional

information on attributes.

All crosswalks require pre-closing USSGL account balances.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by

OMB and Fiscal Service:

Section V Page Number

Balance Sheet (BS) V BS - 1

Statement of Net Cost (SNC) V SNC - 1

Statement of Changes in Net Position (SCNP) V SCNP - 1

Statement of Custodial Activity (SCA) V SCA - 1

Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) V SBR - 1

SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and

Budgetary Resources and Budget Program and Financing Schedule

V SF 133/Sch P - 1

 

Page 1 of 1
Case No. 15,044.

#### UNITED STATES v. ELLIOT.

[3 Mason, 156.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Maine.

May Term, 1823.

Indictment—Conclusion—False Swearing.

1. If a statute offence is alleged in the indictment according to the words of the act, it is not vitiated by a conclusion, which calls the of-fence by a wrong name.

2. As if the offence be false swearing under the pension act of 1820, c. 51 [3 Story’s Laws,. 1778 ; 3 Stat. 569, c. 53], the indictment is not vitiated by the jurors’ conclusion, “And so the jurors say, &c. &c. that the party did commit wilful and corrupt perjury.”

Indictment [against Jedediah Elliot] for taking a false oath under the pension act of 1st of May, 1820, c. 51 [3 Story’s Laws, 1778; 3 Stat. 569; c. 53]. Plea, not guilty. At the trial a verdict was found against the defendant.

Mr. Fessenden, for defendant,

made two points of law on a motion in arrest of judgment: (1) That the act did not make the offence perjury in its technical sense, though it affixed to it the same punishment. (2) That the indictment having concluded in the usual form of indictments for perjury, “And so the jurors &c. do say, that the defendant did falsely, &c. commit wilful and corrupt perjury,” the indictment was bad in substance if the offence was not perjury, and it was not helped by the previous particular description of facts in the indictment. He cited Plowd. 125; 3 Bac. Abr. “Indictment,” H, 3; 2 Hale, P. C. 168, 169, 192; 1 Esp. 280.

Mr. Shepley, U. S. Dist. Atty.

contended e contra on both points, and cited 2 Chit. Cr. Law, 291, (312); 1 Chit. Cr. Law, 156 (232).

1

 [Reported by William P. Mason, Esq.]

STORY-, Circuit Justice.

The pension act of 1820, c. 51, § 2 [3 Story’s Laws, 1778; 3 Stat. 569, c. 53], declares, that “any person, who shall swear or affirm falsely in the premises, and be thereof convicted, shall suffer as for wilful and corrupt perjury.” We incline to think, that the act does not make the offence a technical perjury, but only refers to it, for the purpose of affixing the *1003•same punishment. The other objection is more important. But we think that the conclusion does not vitiate the indictment, if the offence is in other respects fully and exactly described; for it is but an inference of law from the premises; and if the jury mistook the nature of the offence, but have truly stated all the facts constituting it, it Is sufficient, and the conclusion, “and so the jurors say &c.” may be rejected as surplus-age. In the previous part of this indictment, the offence is fully and exactly stated in the very words of the statute; and the party has been found guilty. If guilty of the of-fence, it is wholly immaterial whether it be perjury in the sense of the common law or not.

The motion in arrest of judgment must be overruled.
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification of Chief Executive Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.          Dated:  January 10,2007      /s/ Jerry D. Chase         Jerry D. Chase    Chief Executive Officer  Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report oras a separate disclosure document.
Case 2:04-cv-01009-DFL -KJM   Document 81    Filed 05/31/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-25T10:29:53-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
Before the Third Division,

October 31, 1947

No. 52002.

#### Eurasia Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petitions 6571-R, etc. (Chicago and New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and circumstances surrounding the making of the entries herein are similar in all material respects to the facts and circumstances surrounding the making of the entries in Abstract 51892. On the record herein, the court found that the petitioner, in making the entry in these cases, acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The- petitions were therefore granted.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification
of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 Of The United States Code I, Ernest J.
Mrozek, the Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of The ServiceMaster
Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company. /s/ Ernest
 J. MrozekErnest J.
 MrozekNovember 14,
 2007 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The
ServiceMaster Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 55
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 5/6/2023 1

No Relief from Different Counties 

Using Different Methods 

to Cure Absentee-Ballot Errors 

Barnette v. Lawrence 

(Timothy J. Savage, E.D. Pa. 2:20-cv-5477) 

An election-day complaint challenged unequal procedures in two 

counties for curing absentee-ballot errors. Following a hearing, the 

plaintiffs withdrew their motion for a temporary restraining order, 

and the judge denied the motion. 

Subject: Absentee and early voting. Topics: Absentee ballots; 

equal protection; intervention; matters for state courts; class action. 

On the day of the November 3, 2020, general election, a congressional candidate and a voter filed a class-action federal complaint in the Eastern District 

of Pennsylvania on behalf of voters in Montgomery County and Berks County against Montgomery County election officials alleging different election 

procedures in the two counties.1 With their complaint, the plaintiffs filed a 

motion for a temporary restraining order.2

After conferring with counsel that day, Judge Timothy J. Savage set the 

case for an evidentiary hearing on the following morning.3 At the beginning 

of the hearing, Judge Savage granted motions to intervene as defendants by 

the Democratic National Committee and the Pennsylvania Democratic Party.4

On the case’s third day, the plaintiffs moved to withdraw their temporary-restraining-order motion in light of commonwealth-court proceedings 

scheduled for the following day.5 “[U]pon consideration of the Motion for 

Temporary Restraining Order, the plaintiffs having moved to withdraw the 

motion, and after a hearing,” Judge Savage denied the plaintiffs a temporary 

restraining order.6

The plaintiffs dismissed their case voluntarily on November 11.7

1. Complaint, Barnette v. Lawrence, No. 2:20-cv-5477 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 2020), D.E. 1; see

Jeremy Roebuck, Chris Palmer & Julie Shaw, Pa. Legal Challenges Remain Sparse, Phila. Inquirer, Nov. 4, 2020, at A9 (“On Tuesday, GOP lawyers filed suit in state and federal courts 

contesting efforts by some Pennsylvania counties to allow voters an opportunity to correct 

mistakes in their mail ballots, such as missing signatures.”). 

2. Temporary-Restraining-Order Motion, Barnette, No. 2:20-cv-5477 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 

2020), D.E. 10. 

3. Order, id. (Nov. 3, 2020), D.E. 13. 

4. Transcript at 4–5, id. (Nov. 4, 2020, filed Nov. 16, 2020), D.E. 43; Orders, id. (Nov. 6, 

2020), D.E. 38, 39; Intervention Motions, id. (Nov. 3 and 4, 2020), D.E. 24, 28. 

5. Withdrawal Motion, id. (Nov. 5, 2020), D.E. 35. 

6. Order, id. (Nov. 6, 2020), D.E. 37 (citation omitted). 

7. Notice, id. (Nov. 11, 2020), D.E. 42.
No. 54622.

#### Karavan Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protest 117228-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 78, C. A. D. 401), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Page 1 of 1

Part 1, Section I: Chart of Accounts

The Chart of Accounts provides the basic structure for the U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL). It 

incorporates both proprietary and budgetary accounts. The proprietary and budgetary sets of general 

ledger accounts are self-balancing (total debits equal total credits). It is important to note that central 

agency reporting requires a lower level of detail than the 6-digit USSGL account numbers provided. 

Therefore, the USSGL Board developed attributes containing various domain values that, when added to a 

basic 6-digit USSGL account, provide the appropriate level of detail needed for central agency reporting 

and, in effect, create new USSGL accounts. See Section IV for attribute definitions and domain values. It is 

this lower level of detail, the basic 6-digit USSGL account plus applicable attribute domain values, that 

agencies must capture at the transaction level to (1) comply with USSGL policy, and (2) achieve the 

desired result for proper reporting.

The basic 6-digit USSGL accounts are classified as follows:

100000 Assets

200000 Liabilities

300000 Net Position

400000 Budgetary

500000 Revenue and Other Financing Sources

600000 Expenses

700000 Gains/Losses/Miscellaneous Items

800000 Memorandum

Agencies may expand this numbering system to as many digits as necessary to accommodate agency

specific requirements. However, subsidiary accounts must summarize or “roll up” to the 6-digit USSGL 

accounts plus any related attributes.

In February 1999, the USSGL Board voted to delete summary accounts. However, agencies may 

summarize accounts as they find useful. Section headings replace many of the deleted summary accounts 

to maintain the integrity of the account structure.
Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I, Douglas J. Wetmore, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Griffon Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
November 17, 2010

/s/ DOUGLAS J. WETMOREDouglas J. Wetmore Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)


---



QuickLinks
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 12 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 12 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 12 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of European Micro Holdings, Inc. (the
      “ Company ”)
      on
      Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report ”),
      the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:October16,
                2006
            By:
            */s/
              Jay P.
              Nash*Name:Jay
                P. Nash
                Title:Chief
                  Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to European Micro Holdings, Inc. and will
      be
      retained by European Micro Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.