alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<HTML>
<HEAD><TITLE>Help Using CSV Files - Vegetables Final Estimates 1998-2003</title></head>
<BODY bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font size="+3"><b>Help Using CSV Files</b></font size>
<P>
<font size="+2"><b>Vegetables Final Estimates 1998-2003</b></font size>  -  Released May 28, 2004, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural Statistics Board, U.S. Department of Agriculture.<br>
<P>
<P>
You have downloaded "comma-separated value" (CSV) files which contain delimited-record representations of the tables in the report referenced above.  These CSV files can be imported into spreadsheets, or can be processed easily by other types of software.
<P>
The file<b> indxvegs.htm</b> is among the files you have downloaded.  It contains table descriptions and file names for the CSV files.
<P>
Each line in a given CSV file represents one line in the published table (exception: there is a separate line for each footnote, regardless of how the footnotes are presented in the published table).
<P>
The first two values on the line are not part of the table.  The first value is a table number.  The second value is a line "type", as follows:
<BR><BLOCKQUOTE>
       t = title line<BR>
       h = column heading line<BR>
       u = units definition line<BR>
       d = data line<BR>
       c = the horizontal "closing" line (___) at the bottom of the table<BR>
       f = footnote
</blockquote>
<P>
<b>Examples:</b>
<P>
  <b>Title Line</b><br>
  195,"t","Crop Summary:  Area Planted and Harvested, United States, 2000-2001"<br>
<P>
  <b>Column Heading Lines</b><br>
  195,"h","","Area Planted","Area Planted","Area Harvested","Area Harvested"<br>
  195,"h","Crop","","","",""<br>
  195,"h","","2000","2001","2000","2001"<br>
  195,"h","","","","",""<br>
<P>
  <b>Units Definition Line</b><br>
  195,"u","","1,000 Acres","1,000 Acres","1,000 Acres","1,000 Acres"<br>
<P>
  <b>Data Lines</b><br>
  195,"d","","","","",""<br>
  195,"d","Grains & Hay","","","",""<br>
  195,"d","  Corn for Grain 2/","79545.0","","72732.0",""<br>
<P>
  <b>Closing Line</b><br>
  195,"c",""<br>
<P>
  <b>Footnote</b><br>
  195,"f","2/ Area planted for all purposes."
</body>
</html>
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-96

LT Case No. 2019-CF-2840

_____________________________

SHAWN EDWARDS SIEBERG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Adrian G. Soud, Judge.

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Richard M. Bracey, III, 

Special Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Zac Lawton, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

February 20, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, LAMBERT, and PRATT, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
(Reap. Dec. 11016)

#### Samincorp South American Minerals & Mdse. Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 844469.

(Decided June 16, 1965)

*Henry I. Fillman*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above, has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialled “BS” by Examiner Benjamin Struminski on the invoice covered by the above numbered appeal to reappraisement, and is abandoned as to all other merchandise.

> 2. That the merchandise marked “A” consists of 36 galvanized steel drums which were exported from Japan on October 13,1963.

> 3. That the said galvanized steel drums were entered subsequent to the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 and are not identified in the final list proclaimed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to said Customs Simplification Act Treasury Decisions 54521.

> 4. That at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing appraisement such or similar merchandise was freely sold or in the absence of sales offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States.

> 5. That the export value as defined in Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the said Customs Simplification Act of 1956, of the galvanized steel drums involved herein is $4.35 per drum.

> 6. That the above entitled appeal may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issue described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts, I find and hold that the involved merchandise, marked “A” and initialed BS on the *724invoice by Examiner Benjamin Struminski, is not listed on the final list of articles published in T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958, and that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165 and T.D. 54521, effective on or after February 27, 1958, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and I find and hold that such statutory value is $4.35 per galvanized steel drum.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Draft Proposal CB-10 

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC).   Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/

Skylight Curbs Insulation Exemption (CB-10) 

Objective:  Clarify when a skylight curb can be exempted from meeting the requirements for insulating

the curb.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Exception number 2 to Section C402.2.1 as follows:  

C402.2.1 Roof assembly. 

Exceptions: 

1. (Remains unchanged.) 

2. Unit skylight curbs included as a component of an NFRC 100 rated assembly a skylight listed 

and labeled in accordance with NFRC 100 shall not be required to be insulated. 

Reason: Clarification of language.  The term “rated” is generally understood but the correct

presentation of the criterion is that the assembly be listed and labeled in accordance with NFRC 100.

Cost Impact:   There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
No. 56332.

protest 175910-K (New York).

#### Abercrombie & Fitch Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0428

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

TONY RAY MANYGUNS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 20, 2023, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 13 2023

10/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0428
VOL I APPENDIX 7 2-4700

Note: For closing package reporting purposes, all General Fund activity (TP AID 099) must be reclassified to a closing 

package line within Reciprocal Categories 29-48. 

1

FOR REVIEW PURPOSES ONLY – NOT FINALIZED 

Table 6: Eliminations Summary for Custodial and Non-Entity Transactions

Category Name Reciprocal

Category

Pairing of Eliminating Accounts for Transfers Transactions 

Agency 1–Receiving Agency Agency 2–Collecting Agency 

USSGL Account USSGL Account Title 

USSGL Account 

USSGL Account Title 

Custodial and NonEntity Transactions – 

Other Than the 

General Fund of the 

U.S. Government 

10

Custodial and 

Non-Entity

Liability/Asset

198100F (XXX) Asset for Agency's 

Custodial and NonEntity Liabilities - Other 

Than the General Fund 

of the U.S. Government 

298000F (XXX) 

298500F (XXX) 

Custodial Liability 

Liability for Non-Entity 

Assets Not Reported on 

the Statement of 

Custodial Activity 

 13 

Custodial

Transfers

(Exchange) 

599700FX (XXX) Financing Sources 

Transferred In From 

Custodial Statement 

Collections

599800FX (XXX) Custodial Collections 

Transferred Out to a 

Treasury Account 

Symbol Other Than the 

General Fund of the U.S. 

Government 

 14 

Custodial

Revenues

(Exchange) 

571300FX (XXX) Accrual of Agency 

Amount to be Collected 

- Custodial and NonEntity - Other Than the 

General Fund of the 

U.S. Government 

599000FX (XXX) 

599100FX (XXX) 

Collections for Others–

Statement of Custodial 

Activity

Accrued Collections for 

Others–Statement of 

Custodial Activity 

 15 

Custodial

Transfers (NonExchange) 

599700FE/T (XXX) Financing Sources 

Transferred In From 

Custodial Statement 

Collections

599800FE/T (XXX) Custodial Collections 

Transferred Out to a 

Treasury Account 

Symbol Other Than the 

General Fund of the U.S. 

Government 

16

Custodial

Revenues and 

Non-Entity

Transactions

(Non-Exchange) 

571300FE/T (XXX) Accrual of Agency 

Amount to be Collected 

- Custodial and NonEntity - Other Than the 

General Fund of the 

U.S. Government 

599000FE/T (XXX) 

599100FE/T (XXX) 

599300F (XXX) 

599400F (XXX) 

Collections for Others–

Statement of Custodial 

Activity

Accrued Collections for 

Others–Statement of 

Custodial Activity 

Offset to Non-Entity 

Collections–Statement of 

Changes in Net Position 

Offset to Non-Entity 

Accrued Collections–

Statement of Changes in FOR

Net Position 

R REVIEW al

es and 

EW

on-Entity

Transactions Transactio

(Non-Exchange

571300FE/ EW

R

VIE

- Co

NOT n

Than the han 

d of the 

ernment ernmen

Financing Sourc

Transferred I Transferred 

stodial stodNO

FIANLIZEDount Title

Liability 

ility for Non-Entity

Assets Not Report

the Statement o

Custodial Ac

D

LIZ

X) Custodia

Trans

Tr NL

d

599000FX (XX 599000FX IA F
# sec5_sbr_2018

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2018
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAY LYNN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0543 LKK GGH P

vs.

ARGRO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On April 21, 2005, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. That document

was not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted to the court for

consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served

electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a

document with the court on behalf of any defendants, then documents submitted by plaintiff must

be served on that attorney and not on the defendants. Every document submitted conventionally

to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate stating the date an

accurate copy of the document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and the address to

which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s April 21, 2005 notice of change of address on

Case 2:04-cv-00543-LKK -GGH Document 27 Filed 05/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

counsel for defendants and shall file proper proof of said service. Plaintiff is cautioned that

failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff is further

cautioned that failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and

failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation

that this action be dismissed.

DATED: 5/18/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

lynn0543.35a

Case 2:04-cv-00543-LKK -GGH Document 27 Filed 05/19/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended June 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ Marlene Debel
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: August 6, 2008
---------------------

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financials contained in the body of the accompanying Form 10-K and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           14256
<SECURITIES>                                      2133
<RECEIVABLES>                                    48482
<ALLOWANCES>                                       981
<INVENTORY>                                      35622
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                113135
<PP&E>                                          350372
<DEPRECIATION>                                   96385
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  480378
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            77602
<BONDS>                                         263548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           202
<OTHER-SE>                                       46075
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    480378
<SALES>                                         309450
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                309450
<CGS>                                           202158
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   270463
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               28864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   9733
<INCOME-TAX>                                       400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               4099
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4099
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          19,711
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  404,611
<ALLOWANCES>                                    36,718
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               387,604
<PP&E>                                         592,138
<DEPRECIATION>                                 325,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 660,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          171,600
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,223,702
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   660,678
<SALES>                                        213,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               213,407
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  273,428
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,865
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,184
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (61,886)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (61,886)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.049)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.049)
        

</TABLE>
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 5/29/2023 1

Denial of the Right to Vote Because of Eviction 

Dowd v. Town of Dedham (Joseph L. Tauro 

and Marianne B. Bowler, D. Mass. 1:01-cv-10944) 

A frequent pro se plaintiff filed a federal complaint four days before 

a municipal election. The plaintiff challenged denial of his right to 

vote arising from his eviction from a residence in the town. The 

judge granted the plaintiff in forma pauperis status and ordered 

him to show cause why the complaint should not be dismissed for 

lack of merit. The court of appeals affirmed dismissal of the action. 

Subject: Nullifying registrations. Topics: Pro se party; 

registration challenges. 

A pro se plaintiff filed a federal complaint in the District of Massachusetts on 

Tuesday, June 5, 2001, four days before an election scheduled for Dedham, 

Massachusetts.1

 The plaintiff challenged denial of his right to vote in Dedham arising from his eviction from a residence there.2

 On June 6, Judge Joseph L. Tauro granted the plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis,3

and Judge Tauro issued an order for the plaintiff to show cause why the 

complaint should not be dismissed for lack of merit.4

Based on an amended complaint filed on June 7,5 Judge Tauro ordered 

that day that the case be referred to a magistrate judge.6

 On June 8, Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler recommended dismissal of the action.7

 On 

July 8, Judge Tauro adopted Judge Bowler’s recommendation and dismissed 

the case.8 The court of appeals affirmed the dismissal on January 3, 2002.9

1. Complaint, Dowd v. Town of Dedham, No. 1:01-cv-10944 (D. Mass. June 6, 2001), 

D.E. 4. 

2. Dowd v. Dedham, 25 F. App’x 6 (1st Cir. 2002); see Complaint, Dowd v. McIntyre, No. 

1:00-cv-11611 (D. Mass. Aug. 14, 2000), D.E. 4 (unsuccessful eviction challenge); Complaint, 

Dowd v. Town of Dedham, No. 1:00-cv-10421 (D. Mass. Mar. 6, 2000), D.E. 2 (unsuccessful 

2000 action for the right to vote in Dedham). 

3. Docket Sheet, Dowd, No. 1:01-cv-10944 (D. Mass. June 5, 2001) (D.E. 2). 

Judge Tauro died on November 30, 2018. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory 

of Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

4. Order, Dowd, No. 1:01-cv-10944 (D. Mass. June 6, 2001), D.E. 3. 

5. Docket Sheet, supra note 3 (D.E. 5). 

6. Order, Dowd, No. 1:01-cv-10944 (D. Mass. June 7, 2001), D.E. 6. 

7. Docket Sheet, supra note 3 (D.E. 9). 

8. Id. (D.E. 14). 

9. Dowd v. Dedham, 25 F. App’x 6 (1st Cir. 2002).
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

------------------------------------------------------x 

LORETTA J. FILIPOV, : 

: 

Plaintiff, : ORDER CONCERNING

 : SETTLEMENT

-against- : 

 : 

AMERICAN AIRLINES et al., : 21 MC 97 (AKH) 

: 03 Civ. 7079 (AKH) 

Defendants. : 

------------------------------------------------------x 

ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: 

On May 9, 2007, I approved a settlement of this case. Pursuant to agreed and 

ordered procedure, plaintiff submitted a proposed order for division of the proceeds of 

settlement. I decline to approve the proposed division. 

The essential point of disagreement arises from a proposed distribution to 

plaintiff’s attorneys of 25 percent of the net settlement. All settlements thus far have been based 

on a 15 percent attorney’s fee, based on the net settlement proceeds. I have declined to approve 

settlements that allocated more to attorneys. In light of the public interest in the 9/11 cases, the 

efficiencies that have been created in the consolidated and coordinated proceedings before me, 

and the sizeable amounts involved, I have concluded, and counsel have agreed, that a 15 percent 

recovery out of net proceeds is fair and reasonable. 

I recognize, however, that at this stage, attorneys have spent more and devoted 

more time than was the case for earlier settlements. Current settlements may adequately reflect 

the costs that attorneys have incurred in expenses and disbursements, in relation to earlier 

settlements. On the other hand, there may be other criteria to consider, which differ from those 

considered at earlier stages.
June 20, 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals WILBURT DWAINE CASH , Appellant NO. 14 - 12 - 00718 - CR V. NO. 14 - 12 - 00719 - CR NO. 14 - 12 - 00728 - CR T HE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ Cause No. 14 - 12 - 00718 - CR was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders th e judgment in Cause No. 14 - 12 - 00718 - CR AFFIRMED . Cause Nos. 14 - 12 - 00719 - CR and 14 - 12 - 00728 - CR were heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeals should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeals in Cause Nos. 14 - 12 - 00719 - CR and 14 - 12 - 00728 - CR DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. We further order this decision certified below for observance.