alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kit H. Tan, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Interdyne Company;

Based on my  knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report,  fairly present in all material  respects the financial
condition,  results of  operations  and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's   disclosure  controls  and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

The  registrant's  other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal  control over financial  reporting  which are  reasonably  likely to
adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and
report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting.

Dated: September 12, 2008

                                        By:  /s/ Kit H. Tan
                                                Kit H. Tan
                                                Chief Financial Officer

                                       16
##### 



Exhibit 11.1
 
 Year Ended December 31,
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Average number of shares outstanding
    
    
    28,518
    
    
    
    28,274
    
    
    
    27,915Net income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
    
    $
    18,987
    
    
    $
    68,445
    
    
    $
    72,817Basic earnings per share before cumulative effect
of change in accounting principle
    
    $
    0.67
    
    
    $
    2.42
    
    
    $
    2.61Diluted shares outstandingAverage number of shares outstanding
    
    
    28,518
    
    
    
    28,274
    
    
    
    27,915Assumed conversion of preferred shares (Note 1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,607
    
    
    
    2,610Assumed conversion of convertible trust
preferred shares (Note 1)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Assumed exercise of stock options (Note 2)
    
    
    323
    
    
    
    397
    
    
    
    325Total shares
    
    
    28,841
    
    
    
    31,278
    
    
    
    30,850Net income
    
    $
    18,987
    
    
    $
    68,445
    
    
    $
    72,817Add back interest on convertible shares (Note 1)
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    2,712
    
    
    
    2,715Net income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
    
    $
    18,987
    
    
    $
    71,157
    
    
    $
    75,532Diluted earnings per share before cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle
    
    $
    0.66
    
    
    $
    2.28
    
    
    $
    2.45
 
 (1)
    
    The dilutive effect of convertible shares is based on the if converted method. These shares and interest add back were not
included in 2005 because they were antidilutive.(2)
    
    The dilutive effect of stock options is based on the Treasury Stock method.
EXHIBIT 23

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 18,
2003 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of a new accounting principle)
on the consolidated financial statements of Alliant Energy Corporation
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Alliant Energy Corporation
for the year ended December 31, 2002 in the following Registration Statements
of Alliant Energy Corporation:

1.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-41485 and
    333-92783) - Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan
2.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-46735 and
    333-88306) - 401(k) Savings Plan
3.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-51126) -
    Deferred Compensation Plan
4.  Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-88304) - 2002
    Equity Incentive Plan
5.  Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-26627) -
    Shareowner Direct Plan registration of 6,500,000 shares of Common Stock
6.  Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-70964) -
    Registration of 12,000,000 shares of Common Stock
7.  Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-101209) -
    Shareowner Direct Plan registration of 145,893 shares of Common Stock
8.  Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-101307) -
    Shareowner Direct Plan registration of 2,500,000 shares of Common Stock.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Milwaukee, Wisconsin
March 25, 2003
Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID

ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH 

Working Group: Meeting and Webinar

871840009

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) 

Jun 10, 2013 09:28 AM EDT 512

Total Attended

37

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Country Address City State Organization Zip Code

Rodney Beever US 491 E. Princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403

brice Bowley US Appliance Park Louisville KY GE 40225

Brian Buynacek US 138 Ashwood Ln Orchard Park NY Emerson 14127

d cohen US 1000 Independence Washington DC DOE 20585

Bruce HELFT US 1516 Ninth Street Sacramento CA Energy Commission 95814

Larry Howington US 1925 Ruffin Mill Road Colonial Heights VA AHRI 23834

brian jeanes US 908 HWY 15 North New Albany MS Master-Bilt Products 38652

Stephen Kowalski US 2701 Wilma Rudolph Blvd. Clarksville TN Ingersoll Rand - Trane North 

America

37040

Ping Kumpanon US 6655 W Sahara Ave Las Vegas NV DNVKEMA 89146

Bill Larson US 891 county road U Hudson WI Norlake, Inc. 54016

Stacey Maloney US 6 Campus Dr., 1st Fl. N. Parsippany NJ Hydraulic institute 07054-4406

John Mandyck US 1 Carrier Place Farmington CT UTC 06032

John McLaughlin US John.Mclaughlin@daikinmcqua

y.com

Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021

David Mecadon US 539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem PA National Refrigeration and Air 

Conditioning

19020

Mark Menzer US 11112 chessington pl Reston VA Intertek 20194

John Morris US 539 Dunksferry rd Bensalem PA Continental Refrigerator 19020

charity njau US 770 garrison ave bronx NY Felix Storch Inc 10474

Elizabeth Noll US 400 North Capitol Street NW Washington DC American Gas Association 20001

Kenny Owen US 908 hwy 15 N New Albany MS Master-Bilt 38652

Kent Peterson US 5000 East Spring St Long Beach CA P2S Engineering, Inc. 90815

David Ransom US 500 N. Capitol Street, NW Washington DC McDermott Will and Emery 20155

wes Roan US 1914 Randolph Drive Bryan OH Bard Manufacturing Co., Inc. 43506

General Information
Carl Roberts US 1401 Grandview Av Oconomowoc WI Zero Zone 53066

Joe Sanders US 4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106

Jason Sands US One Delfield Drive Covington TN The Delfield Company 38019

Rafik Sarhadian US 6060 N. Irwindale Ave, Suite P Irwindale CA Southern California Edison 91702

Stephen Schaefer US 618 Hwy 74 South Peachtree City GA hoshizaki america 30265

Louis Starr US 421 sw 6th Portland OR NEEA 97204

Anwar Suharno US 5540 Ketch Road Prince Frederick MD Royston LLC 20678

Knute Svenson US 1200 19th St NW Washington DC Navigant 20036

Elizabeth Tate US 201 Massachusetts Ave Washington DC American Public Gas Assoc 22301

Eric Truskoski US 200 Lafayette St. Middleville MI Bradford White Corporation 49333

Tom Walsh US 4900 Technology Park Blvd Auburn NY daikin mcquay 13021

kevin washington US 1250 conn ave nw washington DC itw 20036

linda wilson US 120 Broadway NY NY NYSOAG 10271

Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201

Yanda Zhang US 11211 Gold Country Blvd, suite 

103

Gold River CA TRC 95670
#### Jerry Dale CARTWRIGHT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MONARCH CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Employer, An Ohio Corporation; Robert J. Smith, Commissioner of the Bureau of Employment Programs of the State of West Virginia, Workers’ Compensation Division, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-1013.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 18, 2001.

Jerry Dale Cartwright, pro se. Scott W. Andrews, Offutt, Fisher & Nord, Huntington, WV; Frederick George Staker, III, Employment Programs Litigation Unit, Charleston, WV, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Jerry Dale Cartwright appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district *129court. *See Cartwright v. Smith,*No. CA-00-396 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 7, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7832

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MAURICE EDGAR MCKENZIE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-01-4700-9; CR-97-32) Submitted: April 20, 2006 Decided: April 25, 2006 Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Maurice Edgar McKenzie, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Hayden Bickerton, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Maurice Edgar McKenzie seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McKenzie has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny McKenzie’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 41 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 41

                      To reauthorize the READ Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 24 (legislative day, January 3), 2023

 Mr. Durbin (for himself and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                      To reauthorize the READ Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``READ Act Reauthorization Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 4(a) of the Reinforcing Education Accountability in 
Development Act (division A of Public Law 115-56; 22 U.S.C. 2151c note) 
is amended by striking ``during the following five fiscal years'' and 
inserting ``during the following ten fiscal years''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 On February 20, 2007, however, plaintiff filed a document best described as a diatribe

against the court and against defendants. Nowhere in it does he show why the findings and

recommendations should not be adopted in full. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN LEE CHRISTMAN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0884 FCD EFB P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 26, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.1

Case 2:04-cv-00884-FCD-EFB Document 97 Filed 03/09/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 26, 2007, are adopted in full; 

2. Defendant’s September 15, 2006, motion for summary judgment is granted;

3. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant Micheletti; and

4. The Clerk is directed to close the case.

DATED: March 8, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-00884-FCD-EFB Document 97 Filed 03/09/07 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7394

ALEXANDER CAMERON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WARDEN, Greensville Correctional Center, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CA-98-1038-AM) Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 19, 1999Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alexander Cameron, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Alexander Cameron seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Cameron v. Warden , No. CA-98- 1038-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 1998). We deny Cameron’s motions for the production of documents and to supplement the record on appeal.We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4227 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4227

  To amend the California Desert Protection Act of 1994 to expand the 
                 boundary of Joshua Tree National Park.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 1, 2024

Mr. Padilla (for himself and Ms. Butler) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the California Desert Protection Act of 1994 to expand the 
                 boundary of Joshua Tree National Park.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Joshua Tree National Park Expansion 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF JOSHUA TREE NATIONAL PARK.

    Section 402 of the California Desert Protection Act of 1994 (16 
U.S.C. 410aaa-22) is amended, in the first sentence, by inserting after 
``October 1991 or prior,'' the following: ``and including the 
approximately 17,842 acres of land depicted on the map entitled 
`Proposed Joshua Tree National Park Expansion' and dated April 29, 
2024,''.
                                 <all>
```
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PACIFIC STATES CREDIT CO.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-04-1283 GEB GGH PS

vs.

LADELLE B. MORROW, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

__________________________________/

On February 2, 2005, the magistrate judge filed

findings and recommendations herein which were served on the

parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. 

No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact

are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th

Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,

708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

Case 2:04-cv-01283-GEB-GGH Document 5 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards

and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to

adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed

February 2, 2005, are ADOPTED; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See

Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

Dated: May 6, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01283-GEB-GGH Document 5 Filed 05/06/05 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

October 23, 1951

No. 55929.

protests 121396-K, etc. (New York).

#### Coro, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# sec5_scnp_2018

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2018-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BAugust 2018
<PAGE>





                         NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES


                                INDEX TO EXHIBITS


     The following documents of Navistar Financial  Corporation are incorporated
herein by reference:

3.1          Restated   Certificate  of  Incorporation  of  Navistar   Financial
             Corporation (as amended and in effect on December 15, 1987).  Filed
             on Form 8-K dated December 17, 1987.  Commission File No. 1-4146-l.

3.2          The By-Laws of Navistar Financial  Corporation (as amended February
             29,  1988). Filed on Form 10-K dated January 19, 1989.   Commission
             File No. 1-4146-1.
Before the First Division,

December 30, 1942

No. 47846.

#### Protests 999083-G, etc., of Frankel Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following Abstract 47109 and in view of stipulation entered into between counsel wherein the Government conceded that the items here in question are not composed in any part of synthetic resin or ivory, that they do not imitate pearls, and that they are not imitation pearl beads, they were found to be beads composed wholly or in chief value of glass and are in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones. The claim at 45 percent under paragraph 1503 was therefore sustained.
# FSIP Decisions

- 2024  FSIP 026 24026Case Number: 2024 FSIP 026 Issuance Date: April 8, 2024
- 2024  FSIP 025 24025Case Number: 2024 FSIP 025 Issuance Date: April 8, 2024
- 2023  FSIP 066 23066Case Number: 2023 FSIP 066 Issuance Date: January 23, 2024
- 2023  FSIP 058 23058Case Number: 2023 FSIP 058 Issuance Date: November 16, 2023
- 2023  FSIP 041 2023 FSIP 041Case Number: 2023 FSIP 041 Issuance Date: October 20, 2023
- 2023  FSIP 041 2023 FSIP 041Case Number: 2023 FSIP 041 Issuance Date: October 20, 2023
- 2023  FSIP 041 2023 FSIP 041Case Number: 2023 FSIP 041 Issuance Date: October 20, 2023
- 2023  FSIP 037 23037Case Number: 2023 FSIP 037 Issuance Date: October 18, 2023
- 2023  FSIP 039 and 04 23039 and 23042Case Number: 2023 FSIP 039 and 04 Issuance Date: July 28, 2023
- 2022  FSIP 089 22089Case Number: 2022 FSIP 089 Issuance Date: July 7, 2023
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350


Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. 1350, I, Nelson A. Locke,
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Amstar Financial Services, Inc.. (the
"Company"), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007,
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


/s/ Nelson A. Locke
--------------------
Nelson A. Locke

March 5, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Registrant and will be retained by
Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.