alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-----------------------------------------------------X 

 : 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER : 

DISASTER SITE LITIGATION : 

 : 

-----------------------------------------------------X 

 

ORDER 

21 MC 100 (AKH) 

ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: 

WHEREAS cases brought by plaintiffs alleging wrongful death or personal injury 

primarily based on circumstances and conduct in the period after the September 11, 2001 attacks 

were consolidated pursuant to this court’s Order of November 1, 2002; and 

WHEREAS plaintiffs who wished to filed claims with the Victim Compensation 

Fund suspended their cases pursuant to this court’s Case Management Order of February 11, 

2003; and 

WHEREAS the lawsuits need to remain dormant for an additional amount of time 

after the December 22, 2003 deadline so that plaintiffs may receive notification from the Victim 

Compensation Fund regarding eligibility. 

IT IS SO ORDERED THAT the date contained in Paragraph 10(a) of this court’s 

February 11, 2003 Order, by which the actions will cease to be suspended if not yet activated, is 

hereby amended from December 23, 2003 to February 27, 2004. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 November 17, 2003 

 ______________//S//______________ 

 ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN 

 United States District Judge
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3987 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES TAYLOR MURRAY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1367 MCE GGH P

vs.

H.D.S.P. MEDICAL CARE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On January 28, 2005, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the

amended complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant Dr. Brown was returned

unserved because “per CDC personnel svcs, unable to locate def. returned unexecuted.” Plaintiff

must provide additional information to serve this defendant. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such

information through discovery, the California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et

seq., or other means available to plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or

unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may seek judicial intervention.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01367-MCE -GGH Document 25 Filed 06/10/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one USM-285 form,

along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed October 8, 2004; and

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form for defendant Dr. Brown; 

b. Two copies of the endorsed amended complaint filed October 8, 2004;

and

c. One completed summons form (if not previously provided) 

or show good cause why he cannot provide such information.

DATED: 6/9/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:bb

murr1367.8e(2)

 

Case 2:04-cv-01367-MCE -GGH Document 25 Filed 06/10/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES TAYLOR MURRAY,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1367 MCE GGH P

vs.

H.D.S.P. MEDICAL CARE, et al.,

Defendants. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

 / OF DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court’s

order filed :

 One completed summons form

 One completed USM-285 form

 Two copies of the October 8, 2004 

 Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-01367-MCE -GGH Document 25 Filed 06/10/05 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Plaintiff has paid the filing fee. He has not filed an application requesting leave to

proceed in forma pauperis to have service effected by the U.S. Marshall pursuant to Rule 4(c)(2).

2

 In the same order, the court also stated that the parties’ status reports would be due

within 120 days. Because of the confusion concerning the deadline, the court will vacate the

dates for the filing of status reports.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEFFREY A. PATE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-1201 FCD DAD P

vs.

SACRAMENTO COUNTY

SHERIFFS DEPUTIES,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 On August 15, 2005, the court ordered plaintiff to serve process on defendant

Garcia within sixty days from the date of the order. The court also ordered plaintiff to file his

status report within ninety days from the date of the order.2 Plaintiff has not filed a notice

indicating that service has been executed on defendant Garcia. Therefore, the court will order

/////

Case 2:04-cv-01201-FCD-DAD Document 22 Filed 11/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

plaintiff to submit proof of service pursuant to Rule 4(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

or show cause why service has not been completed. 

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. Within fifteen days from the service of this order, plaintiff shall file his proof

of service on defendant Garcia, or show cause why service has not been completed;

2. The dates for the filing of status report, set forth in the court’s August 15, 2005

order, are vacated; and

3. Plaintiff’s failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this

action. 

DATED: November 14, 2005.

DAD:4

pate1201.osc

Case 2:04-cv-01201-FCD-DAD Document 22 Filed 11/15/05 Page 2 of 2
### Notes from Meeting with **Bob Spurgin**

**Attended by:** Spurgin and Associates : Bob Spurgin EPA Staff: Kristin Fitzgerald **Date:** January 24, 2014 EPA had a call with Bob Spurgin. He mentioned again that practice among POTWs varies, but one POTW in San Francisco is allowing aqueous pharmaceuticals to be discharged to it.
| **14-Oct-2004****Research Home****Opportunity Definitions****Search****Proposal Site***Subscribe for email notification
Submit Notice of Intent to Propose
Submit Proposal Information***NASA Links*****HQ's CBD Notices**
**Helpful References**
**Research Task Books**
**Help**
 
 

**Office of Space Science (Code S)**- Program Office Home Page
- Research Opportunities
Current (Open) Solicitations
- Other Open Announcements (Not managed by NASA Peer Review Services, e.g. IRTF Observing Time, Chandra X-Ray Observatory.)
Closed Solicitations (Selections not yet announced.)
Past/Archive Solicitations & Selections
Future Solicitations

- Submit Notice Of Intent (NOI) to Propose for OSS Announcements
- E/PO Proposal Site (For selected OSS grantees who wish to submit a related Education and Public Outreach Proposal.)
- NASA Guidebook for Proposers
- Non-Disclosure Form for Reviewers
Word Format
PDF Format

- Status of OSS Research Grants (as administered by Goddard Space Flight Center) 
- To subscribe to the OSS electronic notification system.
- Online Space Science Mission Data 
- OSS Help

**Curator:**NASA Peer Review Services**Responsible NASA Official:**Brent J. Bennett*Disclaimer** |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 60822.

#### Herz Specialty Products, Inc., and D. J. Ambrosio *v.*United States,

protest 279002-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

                                                                      Exhibit 21

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

Listed below are the principal subsidiaries and affiliates of Kaiser Aluminum
& Chemical Corporation, the jurisdiction of their incorporation or
organization, and the names under which such subsidiaries do business. The
Company's ownership is indicated for less than wholly owned affiliates. Certain
subsidiaries are omitted which, considered in the aggregate as a single
subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

                                                                                                     Place of
                                                                                                     Incorporation
         Name                                                                                        or Organization
         ----                                                                                        ---------------
         Alpart Jamaica Inc.(1)(2) .....................................................             Delaware
         Alumina Partners of Jamaica (partnership) (65%)(2).............................             Delaware
         Anglesey Aluminium Limited (49%)(2)............................................             United Kingdom
         Kaiser Alumina Australia Corporation(1)(2).....................................             Delaware
         Kaiser Aluminium International, Inc.(1)........................................             Delaware
         Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical of Canada Limited(1)................................             Ontario
         Kaiser Bauxite Company(1)(2)...................................................             Nevada
         Kaiser Bellwood Corporation(1).................................................             Delaware
         Kaiser Finance Corporation(1)(2) ..............................................             Delaware
         Kaiser Jamaica Bauxite Company (partnership) (49%)(2)..........................             Jamaica
         Kaiser Jamaica Corporation(1)(2)...............................................             Delaware
         Queensland Alumina Limited (20%)(2)............................................             Queensland
         Volta Aluminium Company Limited (90%)(2).......................................             Ghana

---------------------------
(1)      Filed a voluntary petition for reorganization under the Code.
(2)      Entities that may be materially affected if commodity asset sales are
         completed, as discussed more fully in Notes 1 and 5 of Notes to
         Consolidated Financial Statements.
```
Exhibit 4.1

 



This is to   certify that is I are the registered shareholders of: alue 0.001 id The above   shares are subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association of the   Company and transferable in accordance therewith. Director I Secretary   Director No. of Shares Date of Record Par V USD %Pa 100.00
STRAUB ASSOCIATES 

844 WALBRIDGE DR 

EAST LANSING. Ml 48823 

DFP; 

OOCKL : 

m Ft, 

FMTGr 

';••.: K/ i i 

""(o^^^ra-E-vwS-^J''.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4235 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4235

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    reauthorize grants to support for law enforcement officers and 
                   families, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reauthorizing Support and Treatment 
for Officers in Crisis Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 1001(a)(21) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and 
Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10261(a)(21)) is amended by 
striking ``2020 through 2024'' and inserting ``2025 through 2029''.

            Passed the Senate August 1, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4235

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
    reauthorize grants to support for law enforcement officers and 
                   families, and for other purposes.
```
No. 58977.

protests 186303-K and 190233-K (Philadelphia).

#### Caron Spinning Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “T. D. 53159 Clean Content Per cent” in schedule *“A,”*attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
From: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

To: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Date: 11/28/2011 02:59 PM 

Subject: FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on the EGU MACT Rule 

Hi, 

Attached are the handouts from this meeting. 

 

Regards, 

Cortney 

 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Echols, Mabel E. 

Subject: E.O. 12866 Meeting on the EGU MACT Rule 

When: Monday, November 28, 2011 1:00 PM-1:30 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time 

(US & Canada). 

Where: 10103 NEOB 

 

 

This meeting was requested by Many Warner, Environmental Defense Fund. 

 

   

2060AP52_2011_11_28_EDF_Handout2.pdf 

2060AP52_2011_11_28_EDF_Handout1.pdf 

 

2060AP52_2011_11_28_EDF_Handout5.pdf 

2060AP52_2011_11_28_EDF_Handout4.pdf 

2060AP52_2011_11_28_EDF_Handout3.pdf
Exhibit 10.30


July 14, 2008


Securities and Exchange Commission
100 F Street, NE
Washington, DC  20549

Dear Ladies and Gentlemen:

We  are  the  former independent registered public accounting firm for Stem Cell
Therapy  International,  Inc.  (the  "Company").  We  have  read  the  Company's
disclosure set forth in Item 9 "Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting  and  Financial Disclosure" of the Company's Annual Form 10-KSB dated
July  14, 2008 (the "Annual Report") and are in agreement with the disclosure in
the  Annual  Report,  insofar  as  it  pertains  to  our  firm.

Sincerely,



/s/ Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.
Aidman, Piser & Company, P.A.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6590

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FRANK PHILLIP KALITA, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (1:01-cr-00391-JCC)

Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006

Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Phillip Kalita, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Frank Phillip Kalita, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his request for copies at government expense. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. United States v. Kalita, No. 1:01-cr-00391-JCC (E.D. Va.

filed Mar. 3, 2006; entered Mar. 6, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

Kelly, Shaheerah

From: Dwight Mallory <Dmallory@resoluteenergy.com>

Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 9:49 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Cc: Patrick Flynn

Subject: RE: Information Request

Attachments: removed.txt; SC-521-S1R2.pdf

Shaheerah,

As Resolute stated in our November 19, 2014 comments to the draft permit, continuous monitoring of the volume of gas 

combusted in the Main Flare, as required by condition IX.E.1.c of the draft permit, already accounts for any purge gas that 

is combusted by the Main Flare. Purge gas is routed to the flare via the same flare gas inlet nozzle (N-1 on the attached 

diagram) as any process gas that is combusted during upset conditions. All of the gas that is sent to the Main Flare via the 

flare gas inlet nozzle is measured by the Main Flare meter. 

Again referencing our November 19, 2014 comments to the draft permit, the volume of pilot gas consumed by the Main 

Flare is not currently metered as required by condition IX.E.1.d of the draft permit. Emissions from pilot gas combustion 

are insignificant (<0.5 TPY for CO and <0.1 TPY for NOx) and do not justify the costs for installation of metering and 

SCADA equipment to measure the small volume of gas combusted by the pilot. 

Let me know if you need anything else. 

The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

Dwight E. Mallory

Environmental/Regulatory Manager

Resolute Energy Corporation

1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2800

Denver, CO 80203

Direct: 303-573-4886 X 1165

From: Kelly, Shaheerah [mailto:Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov]  

Sent: Monday, December 21, 2015 2:58 PM

To: Dwight Mallory <Dmallory@resoluteenergy.com>

Subject: Information Request

  

Dwight,

Regarding the following conditions in the draft PSD permit, does Please let me know.

Permit condition IX.E.1.c:

The Permittee shall continuously measure and record the volume of gas combusted in the Main Flare.

Permit condition IX.E.1.d:

The Permittee shall install, operate and maintain continuous monitoring systems on the Main Flare for the usage of pilot 

gas and purge gas (other than nitrogen or other inert gas) by the Main Flare, in standard cubic feet per minute 

(SCFM). Readings shall be taken at least once every 5 minutes and the average hourly values shall be recorded on an 

hourly and daily basis.

Thank you.
2

************************************ 

Shaheerah Kelly

Permits Office, Air Division (AIR-3)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

Phone: 415-947-4156 

Fax: 415-947-3579 

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov

  

  

This e-mail message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential, privileged, and 

proprietary information of Resolute Energy Corporation. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution may be prohibited 

under law. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply E-mail of any erroneous transmission, and destroy 

the original E-mail, any attachments, and all copies of the original message. Thank you.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

David S. Henningsen (SBN 064195)

Darrell V. Nguyen (SBN 228959)

ROBINSON & WOOD, INC.

227 North First Street 

San Jose, CA 95113 

Telephone: (408) 298-7120 

Facsimile: (408) 298-0477

Attorneys for Defendant, 

PERINI BUILDING COMPANY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUNTERRA CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs,

 v.

PERINI BUILDING COMPANY, 

et al. and DOES 1 through 100, 

Defendants.

 /

AND ALL RELATED CROSSACTIONS.

________________________________/

Case No. 2:04-cv-0784-MCE-EFB

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

PERINI BUILDING COMPANY'S EX

PARTE APPLICATION FOR AN ORDER

FOR PUBLICATION OF THE SUMMONS 

IT IS ORDERED that the service of the summons in this action be made upon

Cross-Defendants PRECISION GLASS SERVICE, INC. and WADE ADAM

RENSLOW by publication thereof in the Reno Gazette Journal, a newspaper of general

circulation published in Reno, Nevada, and that said publication be made at least once a

week for four successive weeks.

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-00784-MCE -EFB Document 149 Filed 01/12/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of said summons and of said Complaint

in this action be forthwith deposited in the United States Post Office, post-paid and,

directed to said Cross-Defendants if their address is ascertained before expiration of the

time prescribed for the publication of this summons. A declaration of this mailing, or of

the fact that the address was not ascertained must be filed at the expiration of the time

prescribed by publication.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant PERINI BUILDING COMPANY

having shown good cause, shall have one hundred and eighty (180) days from the filing

of the complaint to serve the summons and complaint. 

DATED: January 12, 2007

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00784-MCE -EFB Document 149 Filed 01/12/07 Page 2 of 2