9354 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices 

SUMMARY: The title of the investigation 

as published in the Federal Register on 

February 9, 2007 (72 FR 7455) suggests 

that the Commission will provide 

advice limited to the probable economic 

effect of modification of certain rules of 

origin in the Dominican RepublicCentral America-United States Free 

Trade Agreement for certain apparel 

goods of Costa Rica and the Dominican 

Republic only. However, the text of the 

notice indicates that the Commission 

will provide such advice with respect to 

the probable economic effect of 

modification of the rules of origin on 

such apparel goods of all the parties to 

the agreement. The Commission’s intent 

to is provide the broader advice. 

Accordingly, the title of the 

investigation is amended to delete ‘‘of 

Costa Rica and the Dominican 

Republic.’’ To allow additional time for 

any interested parties who may have 

been confused by the title, the 

Commission has extended the deadline 

for filing written submissions in this 

investigation from March 2, 2007 to 

March 16, 2007. 

All other information in the notice 

published on February 9, 2007, 

including with respect to Commission 

contacts, background information, and 

requirements for submitting written 

statements (except for the deadline) 

remains the same. 

Issued: February 23, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–3539 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–595] 

In the Matter of Certain Dynamic 

Random Access Memory Devices and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Institution of investigation 

pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

January 29, 2007, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Renesas 

Technology Corp., of Tokyo, Japan. A 

supplemental letter was filed on 

February 16, 2007. The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

and the sale within the United States 

after importation of certain dynamic 

random access memory devices and 

products containing same by reason of 

infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 

7,115,344 and 7,116,128. The 

complaint, as supplemented, further 

alleges that an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337. 

The complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

permanent exclusion order and 

permanent cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint and 

supplement, except for any confidential 

information contained therein, are 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 

20436, telephone 202–205–2000. 

Hearing impaired individuals are 

advised that information on this matter 

can be obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at http:// 

www.usitc.gov. The public record for 

this investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, telephone (202) 

205–2560. 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 

210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 

(2006). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

February 22, 2007, ordered that—

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain dynamic random 

access memory devices and products 

containing same by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 1 

and 8 of U.S. Patent No. 7,115,344 and 

claims 1 and 5 of U.S. Patent No. 

7,116,128, and whether an industry in 

the United States exists as required by 

subsection (a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is—

Renesas Technology Corp., Marunouchi 

Building, 4–1, Marunouchi 2-chome, 

Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100–6334. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung 

Main Building, 250, Taepyeongno 2- 

ga, Jung-ga, Seoul 100–742, Korea. 

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 105 

Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, 

New Jersey. 

(c) The Commission investigative 

attorney, party to this investigation, is 

Heidi E. Strain, Esq., Office of Unfair 

Import Investigations, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Room 401–R, Washington, DC 20436; 

and 

(3) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Honorable Paul J. Luckern is 

designated as the presiding 

administrative law judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such 

responses will be considered by the 

Commission if received not later than 20 

days after the date of service by the 

Commission of the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. Extensions of 

time for submitting responses to the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation will not be granted unless 

good cause therefor is shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of a limited exclusion order or 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 40 / Thursday, March 1, 2007 / Notices 9355 

cease and desist order or both directed 

against the respondent. 

Issued: February 23, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–3585 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–585] 

In the Matter of Certain Engines, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing the Same; Notice of 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review ALJ Order No. 6 Granting 

Complainant’s Motion To Amend the 

Complaint and Notice of Investigation 

by Adding a Respondent 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) (Order No. 6) granting 

complainant’s motion to amend the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation to add respondent Wuxi 

Kama Power Co. Ltd. to the 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–

205–3152. Copies of the ID and all other 

nonconfidential documents filed in 

connection with this investigation are or 

will be available for inspection during 

official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 

p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 19, 2006, the Commission 

instituted an investigation under section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, based on a complaint filed by 

American Honda Motor Company, Inc. 

of Torrance, California, alleging a 

violation of section 337 in the 

importation, sale for importation, and 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain engines, 

components thereof, and products 

containing the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,706,769 and 6,250,273. 71 

FR 61799 (Oct. 19, 2006). The 

complainant named Wuxi Kipor Power 

Co., Ltd. of Jiangsu, China as a 

respondent. 

On January 24, 2007, the ALJ issued 

Order No. 6 granting complainant’s 

motion to amend the complaint and the 

notice of investigation to add Wuxi 

Kama Power Co. Ltd. as a respondent to 

the investigation. No party petitioned 

for review of Order No. 6, and the 

Commission has determined not to 

review it. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 23, 2007. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–3587 Filed 2–28–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–556] 

In the Matter of Certain HighBrightness Light Emitting Diodes and 

Products Containing Same; Notice of 

Commission Decision To Review-inPart a Final Initial Determination 

Finding a Violation of Section 337 and 

To Grant a Motion To Strike 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to reviewin-part a final initial determination 

(‘‘ID’’) of the presiding administrative 

law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) finding a violation of 

section 337 by the respondent’s 

products in the above-captioned 

investigation. The Commission has also 

granted respondent’s motion to strike 

complainant’s arguments that are based 

on evidence that was excluded by the 

ALJ. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–5468. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on December 8, 2005, based on a 

complaint filed by Lumileds Lighting 

U.S., LLC (‘‘Lumileds’’) of San Jose, 

California. 70 FR 73026. The complaint, 

as amended and supplemented, alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain high-brightness 

light emitting diodes (‘‘LEDs’’) and 

products containing same by reason of 

infringement of claims 1 and 6 of U.S. 

Patent No. 5,008,718 (‘‘the ‘718 patent’’); 

claims 1–3, 8–9, 16, 18, and 23–28 of 

U.S. Patent No. 5,376,580 (‘‘the ‘580 

patent’’); and claims 12–16 of U.S. 

Patent No. 5,502,316 (‘‘the ‘316 patent’’). 

The complaint further alleges the 

existence of a domestic industry. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named Epistar Corporation (‘‘Epistar’’) 

of Hsinchu, Taiwan, and United Epitaxy 

Company (‘‘UEC’’) of Hsinchu, Taiwan 

as respondents. 

On April 28, 2006, Lumileds moved 

to amend the complaint to: (1) Remove 

UEC as a named respondent, (2) change 

the complainant’s full name from 

Lumileds Lighting U.S., LLC to Philips 

Lumileds Lighting Company LLC 

(‘‘Philips’’), and (3) identify additional 

Epistar LEDs alleged to infringe one or 

more patents-in-suit. Neither 

respondent opposed the motion. 

On May 15, 2006, the Commission 

issued a notice determining not to 

review an ID (Order No. 14) granting the 

complainant’s motion for partial 

summary determination to dismiss 


rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES