alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 64834.

#### Richard M. Ott & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/27154 (Boston).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Amendment to Petition ID: FAA

- 2015

- 3501 12/3/15

Dear Sir or Madam

,

I, William J. Camp wish to further amend my petition to omit and proceed without the inclusion of “ CLOSED

SET FILMING ” in the proposed operating usag e of my Unmanned Aerial System (UAS ). On Page 4 , item

entitled INTRODUCTION AND INTEREST S OF THE PETITIONER and thus eliminating the requirement to

provide a Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) as required by Order 8900.1, Volume

3, Chapter 8, Section 1.

INTRODUCTION AND INTEREST S OF THE PETITIONER originally stated:

 General aerial still photos

 Commercial Media Applications i.e. Wedding Videography and Business Promotional Video

 Wildlife population surveys

 Real Estate marketing

 Aerial inspections of public and private structu res.

I would like to amend this section to now read as follows:

The objective of WILLIAM J CAMP and his aerial operations is to safely provide high quality imaging for a

variety of commercial, public, and residential uses, specifically targeting:

This exempt ion request, once granted would allow the petitioner to operate a

small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs), unmanned aircraft system (UAS) to

conduct bridge Inspections, flare stack inspection, utility

- power generation

system inspections and patrolling, aerial inspection, photography and

videography of residential and commercial real estate, weddings, and wedding

events, aerial inspection, photography and videography of utility

infrastructure including but not limited to electrical power lines, wind

turbines an d cell towers, pipeline inspection and patrolling, filmmaking,

cinematography, and videography, precision agriculture with on board

sensors, wildlife and forestry monitoring and mosquito and insect control,

aerial surveying, construction site inspection an d monitoring, public entity

support operations, Aerial imaging for safety, monitoring and comparing work

efforts and completion percentages, and security of controlled environment

of various sites, aerial video and live video feed to assist with search and

rescue operations under the authority and support of local authority

officials, aerial video and photography for public and private use including

television, public events, and cinematography live feed and live

newsgathering, training to persons individua lly or belonging to both private

and public organizations to increase awareness and improve safety for

current and future UAS operations within the NAS, special events: including

high schools. Colleges, professional sports, open air events and fairs,

resea rch, risk management and assessment, surface mining, disaster and catastrophe events.

I appreciate your further consideration on this matter and I’ve included my contact information below if

there are any further concerns.

Respectfu lly,

William J. Campwjcamp@gmail.com



### 305

- 879

- 8243
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of Extendicare Health Services, Inc. (the "Company"),
hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and that information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Mel Rhinelander
-------------------------------
Mel Rhinelander
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003


/s/ Mark W. Durishan
-------------------------------
Mark W. Durishan
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
August 13, 2003


                                       32
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              May-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                         165,181
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  85,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               250,280
<PP&E>                                         126,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 376,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          190,935
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    1
<COMMON>                                       1,378
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   376,283
<SALES>                                        122,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,518
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  599,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (477,103)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (477,103)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (477,103)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.08)



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3938 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3938

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, as the ``Private First Class 
                      Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 14, 2024

 Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, as the ``Private First Class 
                      Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PRIVATE FIRST CLASS DESMOND T. DOSS VA CLINIC 
              IN LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.-- The community-based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, shall after the 
date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 
``Private First Class Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic''.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the clinic 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Private First Class Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Abgenix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe quarter ending September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I hereby certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

November 9, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ H. WARD WOLFF                                           |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | H. Ward Wolff                                               |
|   | Chief Financial Officer  and Senior Vice President, Finance |
|   | (Principal Financial  and Accounting Officer)               |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Abgenix, Inc.and will be retained by Abgenix, Inc. and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Case No. 9,769.

#### MOORE v. DUNLOP.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 180.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1804.

Judgment — Writ of Error — When Actsas -- Supersedeas.

A writ of error is not a supersedeas unless a copy of the writ be filed in the clerk’s office for the adverse party, according to the 23d section of the judiciary act of 1789 [1 Stat. 85].

[This was a suit by Thomas Moore, use of W. Oxley, against Henry Dunlop.] Motion to quash the execution, it having issued before mandate, and after writ of error filed and citation issued. The judgment was rendered on the 6th of January, 1804. The writ of error was filed on the 13th of Janu*679ary. The bond and citation were filed in supreme court office on the 14th of January. The execution issued on the 2d of July, 1804, and the mandate was filed on the 7th of August, 1804. See Acts Sept. 24, 1789 (1 Stat. .73), § 22, and Feb. 27, 1801, § 8 (2 Stat. 106). No copy of the writ of error was filed in the clerk’s office for the adverse party, according to the 23d section of the judiciary act of 1789 (1 Stat. 85), and on that ground

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

refused to quash the execution.

KILTY, Chief Judge, absent.
# Attendee ReportGoToWebinar

Webinar NameWebinar ID ASRAC Webinar265936657 Actual Start Date/TimeActual Duration (minutes) Jun 27, 2013 02:28 PM EDT107 Total Attended 49 

# Session Details First NameLast NameEmailOrganization Karim Amrane AHRI Jeff Bauman National Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Rodney Beever United CoolAir Corp. Sarah Blackwood Banner Public Affairs Alex Boesenberg NEMA Rob Boteler Confluence Energy Ryan Carroll Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association Greg Case Pump Design, Development & Diagnostics John Caskey NEMA Tim Cassidy Best Buy Steven Cousins The Coca-Cola Company John Cymbalsky EERE Mary Dane Traulsen Andrew deLaski Tom Eckmqn Northwest Power and Conservation Council Mark Fly AAON Inc. Mark Friedrichs DOE Manny Gonzalez GE Power Conversion Keith Goshia Emerson Network Power Robert Hart Consortium for Energy Efficiency David Hungerford California Energy Commission 

# General InformationDiane Jakobs Rheem Dominic Kolandayan Daikin AC (Americas), Inc. Bijit Kundu Energy Solutions Emily Liggett NovaTorque Paul Lin Regal Beloit Ian Magenta Smiths Group John Mandyck United Technologies Mark Menzer Intertek Karen Meyers Rheem Mfg Co Eli Morris MassoudNeshan Southern store Fixtures, inc. charity njau Felix Storch ElizabethNoll Kent Peterson P2S Engineering, Inc. Robert Peterson Rheem Manufacturing Co. Philip Picotte CEE Steve Rosenstock Edison Electric Institute Frank Ryan John Sabelli Sabelli Engineering Terry Small Mortex Joe St John DNV KEMA Stephen Tabor Bluffton Motor Works Jay Taylor Schneider Electric Rusty Tharp Goodman Manufacturing Greg Towsley Christie Ulman US DOE Dennis Ulman GE Power Conversion Linda Wilson
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1038 

KA 13-00818 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JUSTIN JONES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JANE I. YOON OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (LEAH R. MERVINE OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (John

J. Ark, J.), rendered August 14, 2012. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon

in the second degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is

reserved and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County,

for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: 

On appeal from a judgment convicting him, upon his guilty plea, of

criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law §

265.03 [3]), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in denying

his request for a probable cause hearing to determine the lawfulness

of his arrest and the admissibility of evidence obtained by the police

as a result thereof. We agree. As the People correctly concede, the

court erred in determining that defendant was not entitled to a

hearing because his motion papers did not include an affidavit from

defendant (see CPL 710.60 [1]; People v Mendoza, 82 NY2d 415, 421;

People v Battle, 109 AD3d 1155, 1156, lv denied 22 NY3d 1038). The

court also erred in determining that the factual assertions contained

in defendant’s moving papers were insufficient to warrant a hearing. 

In determining whether a hearing is required pursuant to CPL

710.60, “the sufficiency of defendant’s factual allegations should be

evaluated by (1) the face of the pleadings, (2) assessed in

conjunction with the context of the motion, and (3) defendant’s access

to information” (Mendoza, 82 NY2d at 426). Here, considering

defendant’s limited access to information regarding the basis for the

actions of the arresting officers, he “could do little more than

dispute the circumstances surrounding his arrest . . . [D]efendant’s

lack of access to information precluded more specific factual

allegations and created factual disputes, the resolution of which

required a hearing” (People v Bryant, 8 NY3d 530, 534). Thus, “[w]e
-2- 1038 

KA 13-00818 

conclude that, under the circumstances, defense counsel’s affirmation

was sufficient to raise a factual issue necessitating a hearing”

(People v Fagan, 203 AD2d 933, 933). We therefore hold the case,

reserve decision and remit the matter to Supreme Court to conduct a

suppression hearing. 

Entered: October 9, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32.1

  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER
                    63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I,  Jonathan  P.  Ward,  the  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive   Officer  of  The
ServiceMaster  Company,  certify that (i) the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004,  fully complies with  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information
contained  in such Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                                           /S/ JONATHAN P. WARD
                                           -----------------------------
                                           Jonathan P. Ward
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                           May 10, 2004


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster  Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.







                                       26
<PAGE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

IRESHA CARN

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 22

- 2101

LT Case No. 2022

- 300857

- CFDB

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Decision filed January 10, 2023

Appeal from the Ci rcuit Court

for Volusia County

, Karen A. Foxman , Judge.

Matthew J. Metz , Public Defender, and

Steven N. Gosney, Assistant Public

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, and Deborah A. Chance,

As sistant Attorney General, Daytona

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

EDWARDS

, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS , JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 -  Certification  of Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial
     Officer required pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     and furnished herewith pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Axeda Systems Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarterly  period ended  September 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on November  21, 2005 (the  Report),  the
undersigned,  Robert M. Russell Jr.,  Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company and Karen F. Kupferberg,  Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

By:     /s/ Robert M. Russell Jr.
        ----------------------------
        Robert M. Russell Jr.
        Chairman of the Board and
        Chief Executive Officer
        November 21, 2005

By:     /s/ Karen F. Kupferberg
        ----------------------------
        Karen F. Kupferberg
        Executive Vice President,
        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
        November 21, 2005


This  certification  is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to Axeda  Systems Inc. and will be retained by Axeda Systems Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                       TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arthur T. Taylor,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

            (3)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, and

            (4)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
                  indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: July 26, 2004                               /s/ Arthur T. Taylor
                                                  --------------------
                                                    Arthur T. Taylor
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 3.1**

 

RESTATED

 

ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

 

OF

 

INTERNATIONAL ALUMINUM CORPORATION

a California corporation

 

ARTICLEI

 

Thename of this corporation shall be:

INTERNATIONALALUMINUM CORPORATION

 

ARTICLEII

 

Thecorporation elects to be governed by all of the provisions of the GeneralCorporation Law of 1977, as amended, not otherwise applicable to it underChapter 23 thereof.

 

ARTICLEIII

 

Thepurpose of this corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity forwhich a corporation may be organized under the General Corporation Law ofCalifornia other than the banking business, the trust company business orpractice of a profession permitted to be incorporated by the CaliforniaCorporations Code.

 

ARTICLEIV

 

Thiscorporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares to be designatedrespectively Preferred Stock and Common Stock. The total number of shares which this corporation shall have authorityto issue is 10,500,000; the aggregate par value of all shares that are to havea par value shall be $15,000,000.  Thenumber of shares of Preferred Stock that are to have par value shall be 500,000and the par value of each share of such class shall be $10.00.  The number of shares of Common Stock that areto have a par value shall be 10,000,000 and the par value of each share of suchclass shall be $1.00.The Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in oneor more series. The Board of Directors is hereby authorized to fix or alter the dividendrights, dividend rate, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms ofredemption (including sinking fund provisions), the redemption price or pricesand the liquidation preferences of any wholly unissued series of PreferredStock, and the number of shares constituting any such resolution originallyfixing the number of shares of such series.

 

ARTICLEV

 

Theliability of the directors of the corporation for monetary damages shall beeliminated to the fullest extent permissible under California law.

 

ARTICLEVI

 

Thecorporation is authorized to provide indemnification of agents (as defined inSection 317 of the California Corporations Code) for breach of duty to thecorporation and its shareholders through By-Law provisions or throughagreements with agents, or both, in excess of the indemnification otherwisepermitted by Section 317 of the California Corporations Code, subject to thelimits on such excess indemnification set forth in Section 204 of theCalifornia Corporations Code.

 

----