Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices 8399 

School MPS) 556 Parkway, Gatlinburg, 

07000185 

Sullivan County 

Washington, George, School, 205 E. Sevier 

Ave., Kingsport, 07000184 

VERMONT 

Lamoille County 

Morrisville Historic District, Portland, Lower 

Main, Upper Main, Railroad and Foundry 

Sts., Morristown, 07000196 

VIRGINIA 

Fauquier County 

Marshall Historic District, Inc. parts of 

Anderson R., Emerald Ln., Frost St., Main 

St., Rosstown Rd. Wild Aster Ct. and 

Winchester Rd., Marshall, 07000191 

Paris Historic District Area Inc. Federal St. 

and parts of Republican St. and Gap Run 

Rd., Paris, 07000192 

Hampton Independent City 

Chamberlin Hotel, #2 Fenwick Rd., Fort 

Monroe, Hampton (Independent City), 

07000190 

Isle Of Wight County 

Tynes, Robert, House, 13060 Courthouse 

Hwy., Smithfield, 07000194 

Nelson County 

Schuyler Historic District, Crossroads of 

Schuyler Rd., Salem Rd. and Rockfish 

River Rd., Schuyler, 07000195 

Suffolk Independent City 

Mount Sinai Baptist Church, 6100 Holy Neck 

Rd., Suffolk (Independent City), 07000193 

WISCONSIN 

Manitowoc County 

ROUSE SIMMONS (Shipwreck), (Great Lakes 

Shipwreck Sites of Wisconsin MPS) 6 mi. 

off Point Veach, Lake Michigan, 07000197 

A request for REMOVAL has been made for 

the following resource: 

TENNESSEE 

Meigs County 

Meigs County High School Gymnasium, 

(Meigs County, Tennessee MRA), Brown 

St., Decatur, 82004005 

[FR Doc. E7–3261 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–51–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–487 (Remand)] 

In the Matter of Certain Agricultural 

Vehicles and Components Thereof; 

Notice of Commission Decision To 

Review in Part the Administrative Law 

Judge’s Initial Determination on 

Remand; Schedule for Written 

Submissions on the Issues Under 

Review 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined to review 

in part the presiding administrative law 

judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) final initial 

determination on remand in the abovecaptioned investigation, including part 

of Order No. 55. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jonathan Engler, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3112. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on February 13, 2003, based on a 

complaint filed by Deere & Company 

(‘‘Deere’’) of Moline, Illinois. 68 FR 7388 

(February 13, 2003). The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleged violations of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in 

the importation into the United States, 

sale for importation, and sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain agricultural vehicles and 

components thereof by reason of 

infringement and dilution of U.S. 

Registered Trademarks Nos. 1,254,339; 

1,502,576; 1,503,576, and 91,860. 

Twenty-four respondents were named 

in the Commission’s notice of 

investigation. Most of the respondents 

were terminated from the investigation 

on the basis of consent orders, or found 

in default. Of the remaining 

respondents, Erntetechnik Franz Becker; 

Sunova Implement Company; Bourdeau 

Bros., Inc. and OK Enterprises 

(collectively, ‘‘the Bourdeau 

respondents’’); Fitzpatrick Farms; 

Stanley Farms; J&T Farms; and Co-Ag 

LLC (collectively, ‘‘the Fitzpatrick 

Farms respondents’’); and Agrideal 

participated in the investigation. On 

January 13, 2004, the ALJ issued his 

final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) finding 

a violation of section 337. He also 

recommended the issuance of remedial 

orders. The Bourdeau respondents and 

Fitzpatrick Farms respondents 

petitioned for review of the ID. 

On March 30, 2004, the Commission 

determined not to review the ID. The 

Commission then issued its final 

determination, together with a general 

exclusion order, two limited exclusion 

orders, and cease and desist orders, on 

May 14, 2004. 

The Bourdeau respondents appealed 

the Commission’s final determination to 

the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 

Federal Circuit (the ‘‘Federal Circuit’’). 

On March 30, 2006, the Federal Circuit 

vacated and remanded the 

Commission’s final determination as it 

related to Deere European-version selfpropelled forage harvesters. Bourdeau 

Bros. v. International Trade 

Commission, 444 F.3d 1317 (Fed. Cir. 

2006). 

On June 20, 2006, the Commission 

issued notice that it had rescinded the 

general exclusion order and certain 

cease and desist orders, and had 

remanded the investigation to the 

presiding ALJ for proceedings consistent 

with the Federal Circuit’s decision in 

Bourdeau. The ALJ issued his final ID 

on remand (‘‘Remand ID’’) on December 

20, 2006. He found that Deere did not 

authorize the sale of Deere Europeanversion self-propelled forage harvesters 

in the United States and that all or 

substantially all of the Deere selfpropelled forage harvesters sold in the 

United States were North American 

versions. The Bourdeau respondents 

have petitioned for review of the 

remand ID, including Order No. 55 and 

Order No. 59. Deere and the 

Commission investigative attorney 

oppose the petition. 

The Commission has determined to 

review in part Order No. 55 and the 

Remand ID. The Commission requests 

briefing by the parties (1) On the 

standard for authorization that was 

applied in Order No. 55 and how that 

standard was applied in light of the 

burden of proof; (2) on the issue of 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES
8400 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 37 / Monday, February 26, 2007 / Notices 

Deere’s alleged financing of certain 

EVSPFHs; (3) with respect to the ALJ’s 

application of the ‘‘all or substantially 

all’’ standard, including a statement of 

the type and number of sales relied on 

and the basis for reliance on those sales, 

especially the basis for including used 

sales of North American-version 

harvesters in the assessment of whether 

that standard has been met by Deere; 

and (4) on whether all or substantially 

all of Deere’s sales of SPFHs were of 

North American versions of these 

machines. The Commission has 

determined not to review Order No. 59. 

Schedule for Written Submissions: 

Written submissions on the issues under 

review are limited to the parties and 

must be filed by March 6, 2007. Reply 

submissions must be filed by March 13, 

2007. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

Issued: February 20, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–3139 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Inv. No. 337–TA–585] 

In the Matter of Certain Engines, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing the Same; Notice of 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review ALJ Order No. 7 Granting 

Complainant’s Motion To Add a Claim 

to the Complaint and Notice of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) of 

the presiding administrative law judge 

(‘‘ALJ’’) (Order No. 7) granting 

complainant’s motion to add a claim to 

the complaint and notice of 

investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Liberman, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–

205–3152. Copies of the ID and all other 

nonconfidential documents filed in 

connection with this investigation are or 

will be available for inspection during 

official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 

p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone 202–205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that 

information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–

205–1810. General information 

concerning the Commission may also be 

obtained by accessing its Internet server 

(http://www.usitc.gov). The public 

record for this investigation may be 

viewed on the Commission’s electronic 

docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

October 19, 2006, the Commission 

instituted an investigation under section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, based on a complaint filed by 

American Honda Motor Company, Inc. 

of Torrance, California, alleging a 

violation of section 337 in the 

importation, sale for importation, and 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain engines, 

components thereof, and products 

containing the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,706,769 (‘‘the ’769 

patent’’) and 6,250,273. 71 FR 61799 

(Oct. 19, 2006). The complainant named 

Wuxi Kipor Power Co., Ltd. of Jiangsu, 

China as a respondent. 

On January 30, 2007, the ALJ issued 

Order No. 7 granting complainant’s 

motion to add dependent claim 6 of the 

’769 patent to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation. No party 

petitioned for review of Order No. 7, 

and the Commission has determined not 

to review it. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

Issued: February 20, 2007. 

By order of the Commission. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. E7–3249 Filed 2–23–07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1122–0007] 

Office on Violence Against Women; 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Extension of a Currently 

Approved Collection; Comments 

Requested 

ACTION: 30-Day Notice of Information 

Collection Under Review: Semi-Annual 

Progress Report for the Grantees from 

the Legal Assistance for Victims Grant 

Program. 

The Department of Justice, Office on 

Violence Against Women (OVW) has 

submitted the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

The proposed information collection is 

published to obtain comments from the 

public and affected agencies. This 

proposed information collection was 

previously published in the Federal 

Register Volume 71, Number 243, page 

75984 on December 19, 2006, allowing 

for a 60-day comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until March 28, 2007. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to The Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

(1) Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(2) Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

(4) Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with NOTICES