alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Perform Batch Control on Batch Close Offline

To close a batch, complete the following steps:

1. From the Batch Control page, 

Under Batch Detail,

• Enter the Batch Control Count

• Enter the Batch Control Amount

2. Select Next as shown in Figure 1. 

Figure 1. Batch Control Page (Batch Close)

• If Batch Control is set to optional, the CCLO, CCO, or CCS can choose to select to 

Next button without entering the Batch Control count and amount.

• If the amount of a check item was incorrectly entered, select Cancel to return to the 

OTCnet Home Page. No data is saved. 

• If you are a CCLO or CCO and discover that the amount of the check item was 

incorrectly entered, contact your CCS, and edit the check using the Show Item

window.

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

3. The Close Batch page appears. Select Print PDF Report or Export and select Confirm

to close the batch. After Print PDF Report or Export is selected, the Confirm button is 

enabled as shown in Figure 2. The batch is not closed until Confirm is selected.

Figure 2. Print Batch List Report (Batch Close)
Page 1 of 3

Bulletin No. 2022-04

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury Financial Manual (TFM) 

Supplement

1. Purpose: This bulletin notifies agencies that Part 1 and Part 2 of the USSGL Supplement have been 

revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2021 and FY 2022.

2. Summary of Changes: The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. 

3. Changes by Part/Section/File:

Part 1 - FY 2021 Reporting changes to files in Sections IV, V, and VII:

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

 USSGL Attribute Definition Report

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2021 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2021 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary
Page 2 of 3

Part 2 - FY 2022 Reporting changes to files in Sections I, II, III, IV, V, and VII:

Section I: Chart of Accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

 USSGL Attribute Definition Report

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2022 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Balance Sheet

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2022 Reporting

 Reclassified Balance Sheet

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2022 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

 Edits Closing Details

4. Effective Date:

Part 1 requirements for FY 2021 are effective immediately.

Part 2 requirements for FY 2022 are effective immediately.
Page 3 of 3

5. Inquiries:

Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Chris Beck

Director, General Ledger and Intragovernmental Transaction Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Email: USSGLTeam@fiscal.treasury.gov

Date: December 16, 2021
# C_2017144EN.01006202.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/62 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/62

---

Order of the General Court of 7 March 2017 — Isdin v EUIPO — Spirig Pharma (ERYFOTONA ACTINICA)

(Case T-117/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 144/92)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

1

---
March 10, 1948

No. 52224.

protest 117425-K.

#### American Pillowcase & Lace Co. v. United States,

C. D. 1083. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 41 99

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ Uni te d S ta te s o f Am eri ca
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el le e

v.
Dan ie l Dre ws
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an t - Ap pe ll an t

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Dis tri ctof Ne br as ka- Om ah a

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Apri l 3 , 20 17 Fil ed : Au gu st11 , 20 17 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re SM ITH, Chi ef J ud ge , ARNOLD andSHEPHERD, Circ ui t J ud ge s.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

Dan ie l Drews vi ol at ed th e te rm s of hi s supe rv is ed rel eas e an d was se nt en ced , in Nov em be r 20 16 , to 8 m on th s of im pr is on m en t an d 24 m or e m on th s of supe rv is ed rel eas e. He ap pe al ed t h a t s e n t e nc e, an d th e ap pe al was su bm it te d to th is pa ne l on Apr il 3, 20 17

. Si nc e th e ap pe a l w a s s u b mi tt ed , Drews ha s se rv ed hi s fu ll te rm ofi mp r i s o n ment , ha d hi s supe rv is io n rev ok ed ag ai n, an d be en se nt en ced to 6 m or e

m on th s o f im

pr is on m en t wi th no m or e su pe rv is edrel eas e.

“ Fi n a l jud gm en t in a cri m in al cas e m ean s se nt en ce. The se nt en ce is th e jud gm en t.” Bur to n v

. S t e w ar t , 54 9 U.S. 14 7, 15 6 (2 00 7) (p er cu ria m ) (quo ti ng Berma n v. Uni te d St at es , 30 2 U.S. 21 1, 21 2 (1 93 7) ). Bec au se D r e w s is no lo ng er
se rv in g th e se nt en ce, an d th eref or e th e jud gm en t, no w on ap pe al , th e ap pe al is m oo t. Se e Uni te d St at es v. Max ie , No. 16 -1 44 8, 20 17 W L 30 84 42 3 (8 th Ci r. Ju ly 20 , 20 17 ) (p er cu ria m ).

Acco rd in gl y , we di sm is s t hi s ap pe al

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-2

-
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 153 

To ensure reliable observation of hurricanes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2017 

Mr. NELSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To ensure reliable observation of hurricanes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring the Reli5 ability of Our Hurricane Hunter Aircraft Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HURRICANE HUNTER AIRCRAFT. 

7 The Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere of 

8 the Department of Commerce shall secure and maintain 

9 secondary backup capability for each class of hurricane re10 connaissance, research, surveillance, and response aircraft 

11 sufficient to prevent a single point of failure. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 153 IS

1 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

2 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums 

3 as may be necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. *51655.*

#### Protests 650659-G, etc., of B. F. Montague Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. *333).*In accordance therewith the claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was sustained.
#### Frank RISICA, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Respondent.

No. 01-3184.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 2001.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) and to file the required Statement Concerning Discrimination, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3915 

To prohibit sanctuary jurisdictions from receiving community development 

block grants. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2024 

Mr. VANCE (for himself and Mr. HAGERTY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit sanctuary jurisdictions from receiving community 

development block grants. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Community Devel5 opment Block Grants for Sanctuary Cities Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INELIGIBILITY OF SANCTUARY JURISDICTIONS FOR 

7 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS. 

8 Title I of the Housing and Community Development 

9 Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3915 IS

1 (1) in section 102(a) (42 U.S.C. 5302(a)), by 

2 adding at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(25)(A) Except as provided in subparagraph 

4 (B), the term ‘sanctuary jurisdiction’ means any 

5 State or political subdivision of a State that has in 

6 effect a statute, ordinance, policy, or practice that 

7 prohibits or restricts any government entity or offi8 cial from— 

9 ‘‘(i) sending, receiving, maintaining, or ex10 changing with any Federal, State, or local gov11 ernment entity information regarding the citi12 zenship or immigration status (lawful or unlaw13 ful) of any individual; or 

14 ‘‘(ii) complying with a request lawfully 

15 made by the Department of Homeland Security 

16 under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration 

17 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226, 1357) to 

18 comply with a detainer for, or notify about the 

19 release of, an individual. 

20 ‘‘(B) A State or political subdivision of a State 

21 shall not be deemed a sanctuary jurisdiction based 

22 solely on its having a policy whereby its officials will 

23 not share information regarding, or comply with a 

24 request made by the Department of Homeland Secu25 rity under section 236 or 287 of the Immigration 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3915 IS

1 and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1226, 1357) to com2 ply with a detainer regarding, an individual who 

3 comes forward as a victim or a witness to a criminal 

4 offense.’’; and 

5 (2) in section 104(b) (42 U.S.C. 5304(b))— 

6 (A) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at 

7 the end; 

8 (B) by redesignating paragraph (6) as 

9 paragraph (7); and 

10 (C) by inserting after paragraph (5) the 

11 following: 

12 ‘‘(6) the grantee is not a sanctuary jurisdiction 

13 and will not become a sanctuary jurisdiction during 

14 the period for which the grantee receives a grant 

15 under this title; and’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 47329.

#### Protests 41286-K, etc., of Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. (Portland, Maine.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported and that no addition should have been made for planing, or tonguing and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Financial Innovation & Transformation
- FMIP
- Agency Partnership

# Agency Partnership

For the third consecutive year, the Office of Financial Innovation and Transformation (FIT) is offering the Financial Management Innovation Partnership (FMIP). The FMIP is an initiative run by FIT to explore technologies that have the potential to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of federal financial management. Selected agencies will earn funding support for their projects to aid them in advancing their ideas, pilots, or proofs of concept with the intent of shaping novel concepts into concrete solutions. Preference is given to new/emerging technologies or technologies with limited adoption across the Federal government.

See the recipients for 2018 and 2019 and read their stories!

## Calling all Federal Agencies with innovative ideas!

FMIP is soliciting ideas from federal agencies that can help overcome the problems faced by the federal financial management community. Although all ideas are welcomed, the FMIP has specific interest in projects that involve artificial intelligence and blockchain. We’re also interested in innovative solutions to challenges surfaced by COVID-19 and the CARES Act.

Proposals must meet one or more of the following objectives:

- Optimize and digitize financial management processes
- Increase the value and availability of financial data and analytics to advance sound decision-making and insight 
- Improve the productivity, transparency, and quality of service of federal financial management
- Offer customers a modern user experience that is simple, reliable, transparent and secure when they interact in federal financial transactions

*By providing funding assistance to agencies to pilot and evaluate promising innovations through the FMIP, Treasury can accelerate and promote adoption of these capabilities across the federal government.*

## Summary and Requirements:

- Open to federal agencies in the executive branch
- 3-6 month duration for the proposed pilot or proof of concept
- Proposed solution needs to address at least one of the above objectives of the initiative
- Must be a solution that supports similar needs at other Federal agencies
- Funds must be obligated no later than September 30, 2020
- Recipients will be requested to meet on a periodic basis to:                 - Report out status updates and project findings; and
  - Share their best practices, lessons learned, and outcomes with FIT and other agencies across the federal government 

## Important Dates:

- 2020 FMIP application period opens: June 8, 2020
- Application Deadline: July 10, 2020
- Recipients Announced: by July 31, 2020

**Download the FMIP Submission Form and submit by July 10, 2020 to be considered.**

**Learn More:**

For more information, contact:FIT@fiscal.treasury.gov            In the subject line, note "FMIP Question".

Last modified 07/17/20
No. 64830.

#### Eastern Commission Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/1429, 60/2960, and 60/5389 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
U.S. Department of Justice

Office of Community Oriented Policing Services

Fact Sheet www.cops.usdoj.gov

Created: December 16, 2002

e10021763

All grantees must follow the regulations listed in 28 C.F.R. 66.36 Procurement. If an agency determines that 

non-competitive procurement applies to an award, it should submit a written request for an exception to the general rule

regarding competition. Use the following format if your agency intends to spend $100,000 or more without a

competitive bid:

COPS MORE: Sole Source Justification

Paragraph 1: Description

• Briefly describe the program.

• Describe the goods or services to be

procured non-competitively.

Paragraph 2: Necessity of Non-Competitive

Procurement

• Outline the contractor's expertise.

• Describe the advantages of the

contractor's management team.

• Illustrate the contractor's

responsiveness.

• Detail the contractor's knowledge of

the program.

• Explain the importance of 

the experience of the 

contractor's personnel.

• Either include the results of a market

survey that shows unavailability of

competition, or an explanation of why

such a survey was not conducted.

Paragraph 3: Time Constraints

• Explain when contractual coverage is

required and why.

• Outline the impact on the program of

unmet deadlines.

• Estimate how long it would take

another contractor to reach the same

level of competence.

Paragraph 4: Uniqueness

Paragraph 5: Other Relevant Factors

Paragraph 6: Declaration of Agency's Best Interests

Requests for a non-competitive procurement should be sent

to:

COPS MORE Control Desk

Office of Community 

Oriented Policing Services (COPS)

1100 Vermont Avenue NW, 7th Floor

Washington, D.C. 20530
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,678
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,971
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     43,384
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                89,260
<PP&E>                                         111,149
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,585
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,674
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,888
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,585
<SALES>                                        215,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               215,547
<CGS>                                          159,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  159,523
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   481
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 428
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,924
<INCOME-TAX>                                       670
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,254
<DISCONTINUED>                                     325
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,579
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED
SEPT. 30, 2000.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,056
<INVENTORY>                                    119,516
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               195,811
<PP&E>                                         465,728
<DEPRECIATION>                                 166,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 598,057
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,761
<BONDS>                                        208,926
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           75,018
<PREFERRED>                                         34
<COMMON>                                           216
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   598,057
<SALES>                                        492,712
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               492,712
<CGS>                                          453,487
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  453,487
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   223
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,169
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,757)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,757)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,757)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (2.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.34)


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON, No. 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB P 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

 

D.L. RUNNELS, et al., 

 ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 Defendants. AD TESTIFICANDUM

 / 

Vance Edward Johnson, CDCR # P-48409, a necessary and material witness in a jury 

trial in this case on February 8, 2016, is confined in Pleasant Valley State Prison (PVSP), in the 

custody of the Warden. In order to secure this inmate’s attendance it is necessary that a Writ of 

Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before 

Judge Troy L. Nunley at the U. S. District Court, Courtroom No. 2, 501 I Street, 15th Floor, 

Sacramento, California 95814, on Monday, February 8, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court, 

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a 

settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement 

conference or as ordered by Judge Claire. 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is 

ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden, PVSP, P.O. Box 8500, Coalinga, CA 93210: 

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge Nunley at the 

time and place above, until completion of the trial in this matter, or as ordered by the court. 

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate 

and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

DATED: December 17, 2015. 

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 293 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 1