alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Welwind Energy International Corp.
      (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Tammy-Lynn McNabb, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ Tammy-Lynn
                McNabbTammy-Lynn
                McNabb
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              August
                14, 2007
Before the First Division,

December 23, 1959

No. 63631.

protest 58/5520 (New York).

#### Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of straw and raffia ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Louis Weinberg Associates, Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 182, C.D. 1465), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed June 13, 2019.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-19-00063-CV

BONG-BONG TINIO CENTENO, Appellant 

V.

EDEN G. CENTENO, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 3 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 1124120 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 16, 2019. The clerk’s 

record was filed April 5, 2019. The reporter’s record was filed March 26, 2019. No 

brief was filed.

On May 14, 2019, this court issued an order stating that unless appellant 

filed a brief on or before June 5, 2019, the court would dismiss the appeal for want 

of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
2

Appellant filed no brief. Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

 PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Jewell, and Hassan.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THIRD
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                      19,110,984                 391,687
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,481,398               4,463,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (71,891)               (259,893)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               658,856                 406,974
<PP&E>                                       3,758,647               2,859,730
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,335,018)               (825,562)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,698,505              14,425,087
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,971,366               4,542,039
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0              10,223,475
<COMMON>                                        34,818                   1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (920,919)               (723,414)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,698,505              14,425,087
<SALES>                                     25,552,056              17,741,755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,552,056              17,741,755
<CGS>                                       17,389,784              12,212,686
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               17,389,784              12,212,686
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,685,822               5,283,863
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (40,421)               (262,287)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                176,280                   4,161
<INCOME-TAX>                                   114,695                 672,330
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   290,975               (852,623)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00                   (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00                   (.20)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LARRY SHAW,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 200 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 25th day of October, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
18.13
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2020
(Reap. Dec. 10379)

Entry No. 1534, etc.

#### Brown, Alcantar & Brown, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 4, 1962)

*8harretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Ghtilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*466OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe parties hereto that tbe merchandise which is the subject of the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of phonograph records exported from Mexico after March 18, 1959.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that phonograph records are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States and the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for re-appraisement listed in Schedule B are hereby submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I ibid tbat the proper basis for appraisement of the phonograph records in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the prices shown in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Retrieve a Check Capture Administrator Offline Logon Profile

To retrieve a Check Capture Administrator Offline logon profile, complete the following steps:

1. Double-click the OTCnet Offline (Production or QA) icon on the workstation desktop.

Or 

Click Start>Programs>OTCnet Offline (Production or QA)>Start OTCnet Offline 

(Production or QA). The OTCnet Offline Server Startup page appears.

• If the OTCnet Offline icon is not located on the workstation desktop or Start Menu, 

under Programs, download and install the OTCnet Offline Check Capture software. 

• If the Offline server was previously started, proceed to Step 3.

2. Enter your User ID and Password in the appropriate text boxes and click Log In (if 

applicable). The OTCnet Login page appears.

3. Click the Retrieve Admin Profile hyperlink as shown in Figure 1. The Retrieve Admin 

Profile page appears.

Figure 1. OTCnet Offline Home Page

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Use the Retrieve Admin Profile hyperlink if this is the first time you are installing the 

OTCnet Offline application on your workstation or if you forgot your Offline password and 

had to create a new CCA Offline logon profile.

4. Enter your Online User ID and Online Password.

5. Under Proxy Server Configuration (if applicable):

• Check Use Firewall Agent and enter the Firewall Agent

• Check Use Proxy and enter Proxy Timeout, Proxy Password, Proxy Server

and Proxy Port

• If Proxy Server Configuration settings are entered, they are saved in the system 

and can later be viewed and modified in Terminal Configuration. 

• If the Use Firewall Agent option is enabled, the Firewall Agent is available for 

configuration and the agent name can be entered.

• If the Use Proxy option is enabled, then Proxy Timeout, Proxy Password, Proxy 

Server, and Proxy Port are available for configuration.

• The Proxy Timeout value is the number of minutes the application waits for a 

connection to the server before giving up. The maximum allowed timeout is 30 

minutes.

6. Click Retrieve Profile as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Retrieve Admin Profile Online Credentials

Application Tip

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

7. Enter your New Password, and Re-Enter New Password.

8. Click Save. A Confirmation page appears stating your new password has been set. 

• This new password is also the permanent password for your offline logon profile, 

used for starting up the Offline server and application.

• Once the profile is successfully downloaded and your permanent password is set, 

you are prompted to log in to the Offline application with your new password.

• If the profile download was unsuccessful, a message appears stating that the profile 

download was unsuccessful and to contact Customer Service for assistance.

9. Restart your computer to ensure that all OTCnet security features are fully enabled.

Application Tips
No. 60801.

#### Barker Brothers Silver Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 280167-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Gary C. Loraditch, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 13, 2006
```

                                                         Exhibit 21

                     NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                         AND SUBSIDIARIES
                ----------------------------------
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                      AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2003

                                                        STATE OR
                                                       COUNTRY IN
                                                          WHICH
                                                       SUBSIDIARY
                                                        ORGANIZED
                                                     ------------------

Subsidiaries that are 100% owned by Navistar
   Financial Corporation:
     Navistar Financial Retail Receivables Corporation.   Delaware
     Navistar Financial Securities Corporation.........   Delaware
     Truck Engine Receivables Financing Co.............   Delaware
     Truck Retail Accounts Corporation.................   Delaware
     Truck Retail Instalment Paper Corp................   Delaware

Subsidiaries not shown  by name  in the above listing, if considered in the
aggregate  as  a  single  subsidiary,  would  not  constitute a significant
subsidiary.
```
Before the Third Division,

February 14, 1952

No. 56392.

petition 6823-R (Boston).

#### Irving M. Sobin Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the entry in question was only one of a series of importations of stearic acid made between 1937 and 1940 from the same shipper in Belgium and that many conferences were had with the appraiser in an endeavor to arrive at the proper value. Finally, it was agreed that a test case should be made of the entry and that all of the other entries be suspended. Because of the war, it was impossible to secure definite information. After the war, the president of the petitioner went to Europe to obtain some information but discovered that the company selling the material was no longer there and, consequently, the appeal in the test case was abandoned. In view of the evidence presented it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue or to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 66790.

#### The Electro Motive Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/16094 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ceramic tubes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *John H. Faunce, Philadelphia, Inc.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58951.

protest 244207-K (New York).

#### Stern Glass Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

An examination of the papers disclosing nothing to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector, the protest was overruled.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Criminal No. 01-455-A

)

ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI )

a/k/a “Shaqil,” )

a/k/a “Abu Khalid )

al Sahrawi,” )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

The defendant, pro se, has filed a motion (Docket #658) in

which he complains that the United States produced a blank

videotape of the Al Jazeera interview of Ramzi Binalshibh. He

also requests a copy of a “good will” tape prepared by another

individual. 

The United States’ provision of a blank videotape is an

inexcusable error which must be corrected immediately. For this

reason, the defendant’s motion is GRANTED as to his request for a

new copy of the Binalshibh tape; and it is hereby

ORDERED that the United States forthwith provide the

defendant with a copy of the Binalshibh tape. 

However, we do not find that the defendant has articulated a

sufficient basis upon which the United States must be compelled

to produce the other requested tape. Accordingly, his motion is

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as to this request. If Mr. Moussaoui is

able to establish the relevance of this tape to his defense, we
1 If articulating the relevance of this tape will reveal

defense strategy, the defendant may file any submission regarding

this issue ex parte. Any such filing will be shared with standby

defense counsel.

2 In light of this decision, counsel for the United States

need not advise the Court of its proposed redactions. 

2

will reconsider this request.1

We further find that the defendant’s motion is not

appropriate for the public record because it is replete with

irrelevant and inflammatory rhetoric, including messages to third

parties and a prayer for the destruction of the United States. 

Therefore, in accordance with our Order of September 27, 2002, it

is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s pro se motion docketed as #658

remain under total seal.2 

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to the

defendant, pro se; counsel for the United States; and standby

defense counsel.

Entered this 5th day of November, 2002.

/s/

_________________________________

Leonie M. Brinkema

United States District Judge

Alexandria, Virginia
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should no t be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

April 9, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60942

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANIEL EASLEY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Mississippi

No. 2:03-CR-4-ALL-P

--------------------

Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Daniel Easley appeals his sentence following his guilty plea

conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more

than 100 kilograms of marihuana. He argues that the district court

erred in finding that he possessed a firearm during the offense for

purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) and erred in concluding that heNo. 03-60942

-2-

was ineligible for the “safety valve” reduction of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2.

As part of his written plea agreement, Easley agreed to waive

the right to appeal his conviction and sentence. The district

court personally addressed Easley and admonished him regarding his

waiver; Easley stated that he understood the waiver. Thus, he

knowingly and voluntarily waived the right to appeal his sentence.

See United States v. Robinson

, 187 F.3d 516, 517-18 (5th Cir.

1999). Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED as waived.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN HAWK, No. CIV S-04-0731-MCE-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time

(Doc. 19), filed on November 30, 2005. 

On November 4, 2005, the court dismissed plaintiff’s second amended complaint

with leave to amend and directed plaintiff to file a third amended complaint within 30 days. 

Plaintiff now seeks a 30-day extension of that deadline. Good cause appearing therefor, the

request will be granted. Plaintiff is warned that failure to comply with the court’s November 4,

2005, order within the time provided in this order may result in dismissal of this action for lack

of prosecution and failure to comply with court orders and rules. See Local Rule 11-110. 

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-00731-MCE -CMK Document 20 Filed 12/07/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff shall file a third amended complaint within 30 days of the date of

service of this order.

DATED: December 4, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00731-MCE -CMK Document 20 Filed 12/07/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 56389.

protests 890308-G, etc. (New York).

#### Balfour Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 56 Filed 12/12/05 Page 1 of 6Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 56 Filed 12/12/05 Page 2 of 6Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 56 Filed 12/12/05 Page 3 of 6Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 56 Filed 12/12/05 Page 4 of 6Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 56 Filed 12/12/05 Page 5 of 6Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 56 Filed 12/12/05 Page 6 of 6
No. 51969.

#### Argenta Products Co. *v.*United States,

protests 108324-K, etc. (Portland, Maine).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of fish scales similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Edward I. Petow & Son*(34 C. C. P. A. 55, C. A. D. 343). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited the claim for free entry under paragraph 1677 was sustained.