alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HARRINGTON & CALDWELL, P.C. 

By: ROGER J. HARRINGTON ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF 

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 09885 

100 NORTH 17TH STREET, 15TH FL. 

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 

(215)751-1135 

 }

GEORGE S. PAULL 

 vs. 

KEMPER, INC. aka t/a KEMPER 

NATIONAL SERVICES, INC. 

and W.W. GRAINGER, INC. 

CLAIM UNIT, aka t/a 

INTEGRATED DISABILITY 

MANAGEMENT 

 and 

W.W. GRAINGER, INC.

IN THE UNITED STATED 

DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE EASTERN DISTRICT 

OF PENNSYLVANIA 

NO.: 02-4461 

SUGGESTION OF DEATH AND PRAECIPE TO SUBSTITUTE PLAINTIFF 

DECEDENT WITH ESTATE OF DECEDENT

TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA: 

 George S. Paull, plaintiff in the above matter, departed this world on 

December 9, 2002. Undersigned counsel requests that the Court substitute 

decedent with Janet O. Paull, Executrix of the Estate of George S. Paull as 

plaintiff in the above matter. Thank you. 

 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, 

 

 ROGER J. HARRINGTON 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:02-cv-04461-CRW Document 14 Filed 12/29/2003 Page 1 of 1
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 8/31/2023 1

Challenging Both Nominating 

and Voting Procedures 

White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Virginia 

(Henry C. Morgan, Jr., E.D. Va. 2:03-cv-897) 

A plaintiff who had desired to be a party nominee for an election to 

clerk of court filed a pro se federal complaint alleging improprieties 

in both nomination and voting procedures. The motion was heard 

and denied six days later. Six months after that, the court granted 

summary judgment to the defendants. 

Subject: Voting procedures. Topics: Getting on the ballot; pro se 

party. 

A plaintiff who had desired to be a party nominee for an election to clerk of 

court for Virginia’s circuit court in Norfolk filed a pro se federal complaint in 

the Eastern District of Virginia’s Norfolk courthouse on December 24, 2003.1

The complaint alleged improprieties in both nomination and voting procedures.2

 With her complaint, the plaintiff filed a motion for a temporary restraining order.3

Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr., heard and denied the motion on December 

30.4 The plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction on January 6, 

2004, and Judge Morgan granted summary judgment to the defendants on 

June 29.5

1. White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Va., 323 F. Supp. 2d 696, 698 (E.D. Va. 2004); see

Docket Sheet, White-Battle v. Democratic Party of Va., No. 2:03-cv-897 (E.D. Va. Dec. 24, 

2003). 

2. White-Battle, 323 F. Supp. 2d at 698–700. 

3. Id. at 700; Docket Sheet, supra note 1. 

4. White-Battle, 323 F. Supp. 2d at 700. 

Judge Morgan died on May 1, 2022. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of 

Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

5. White-Battle, 323 F. Supp. 2d at 700, 702–09.
No. 53503.

protests 110672-K, etc. (Pittsburgh).

#### Fisher Scientific Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<PAGE>
     
     

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                                          
                                          
The Board of Directors
Dain Rauscher Corporation:

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-53851, Registration Statement No. 333-03113, Registration Statement No.
333-20487, Registration Statement No. 33-58069, Registration Statement No.
33-54223, Registration Statement No. 33-54907, Registration Statement No.
33-59426, Registration Statement No. 33-39182, Registration Statement No.
33-25979, post-effective amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.
333-53851, post-effective amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.
33-13068, post-effective amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 33-10243,
post-effective amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 33-10242,
post-effective amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No. 2-90634,
post-effective amendment No. 8 to Registration Statement No. 2-61514,
post-effective amendment No. 11 to Registration Statement No. 2-57759,
post-effective amendment No. 15 to Registration Statement No. 2-53289,
post-effective amendment No. 16 to Registration Statement No. 2-51150 and
Registration Statement No. 1-08186 of Dain Rauscher Corporation, and
subsidiaries of our report dated February 5, 1998, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Dain Rauscher Corporation (formerly Interra Financial
Incorporated) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows and
the related financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the December 31, 1997
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dain Rauscher Corporation.








                                             KPMG Peat Marwick LLP






Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 26, 1998
No. 63622.

protests 715471-G, etc. (Boston).

#### H. P. Lambert Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richakdson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
-  Bureau of the Fiscal Service 
-  Financial Innovation & Transformation 
-  Blog 
- TFX Is Back In Business!

# TFX Is Back In Business!

The Bureau of the Fiscal Service is proud to announce the next phase of the Treasury Financial Experience (TFX).

In recent months, we met with subject matter experts (SMEs) of the Treasury Financial Manual (TFM) Volumes II-IV to discuss organizing this content on the TFX website.

The SMEs identified existing topical views and created new topical views to streamline the content on the TFX website.

By October 2023, TFX will finish reorganizing Treasury Financial Manual (TFM) Volumes II-IV content into topical views on the TFX website. Once the reorganization is finished, all TFM Volumes I-IV content will be arranged in the topical views of the TFX website to ensure all information is easy to find.

TFX updates coming soon:

- Reorganization of the TFM Volumes II-IV content into existing TFX topical views.
- Creation of a new topical view for Federal Reserve Bank Reporting in topical views for Disbursing and Payment Reporting.
- Creation of a new topical view for Federal Reserve Bank Procedures in topical views for Collections and Revenue Collections.

We encourage you to stay connected by visiting TFX.treasury.gov.

Users can also sign up at join-tfx-mailing-list@lists.fiscal.treasury.gov to join the conversation by participating in user research or being the first to find out when new content and functionality is added.

To provide feedback, please send your comments to TFXFeedback@fiscal.treasury.gov.                

Last modified 09/12/23
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-41464 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIO TREVINO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. C-99-CR-263-1

-------------------- August 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mario Trevino appeals his sentence following his guilty plea conviction of one count of possession of 6,704 grams of methamphetamine with intent to distribute. He argues that the district court abused its discretion when it refused to grant him a downward departure at sentencing based on the alleged low purity of the methamphetamine and based on his mistaken belief that the contraband he possessed was marijuana.No. 01-41464 -2- This court lacks jurisdiction to review a defendant’s challenge to his sentence based on mere dissatisfaction with the court’s refusal to grant a downward departure, unless the court’s refusal was the result of a violation of law or a misapplication of the Guidelines. United States v. DiMarco , 46 F.3d 476, 477 (5th Cir. 1995). A refusal to depart is a violation of law if the court mistakenly believed that it lacked the authority to depart. United States v. Burleson , 22 F.3d 93, 95 (5th Cir. 1994). The record does not show that the district court’s refusal to grant his requested downward departures was based on a mistaken belief that it could not do so. Rather, the district court based its decision on its belief that the requested departures were not appropriate. Because the district court did not misapprehend its authority under the Sentencing Guidelines, we lack jurisdiction to hear this appeal. Id. Accordingly, Trevino’s appeal is DISMISSED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary 

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Department of the Interior. 

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting. 

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Interior, Office of the Secretary is announcing a public meeting of the Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Public Advisory Committee. 

# DATES:

March 2, 2007, at 9 a.m. 

# ADDRESSES:

Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Trustee Council Office, 441 West 5th Avenue, Suite 500, Anchorage, Alaska. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Douglas Mutter, Department of the Interior, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, 1689 “C” Street, Suite 119, Anchorage, Alaska 99501, (907) 271-5011. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Public Advisory Committee was created by Paragraph V.A.4 of the Memorandum of Agreement and Consent Decree entered into by the United States of America and the State of Alaska on August 27, 1991, and approved by the United States District Court for the District of Alaska in settlement of                     *United States of America*                     v.                     *State of Alaska*, Civil Action No. A91-081 CV. The meeting agenda will include a                           ( print page 8002)                        discussion of the mission and vision for the restoration program, and a review of pending proposals for inclusion in the fiscal year 2007 work plan.                 

Willie R. Taylor, 

Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance.

 [FR Doc. E7-2942 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310-RG-P
(Reap. Dec. 10712)

#### American Roland Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 796007, etc.

(Decided April 7, 1964)

*Eugene R. Pielcrell*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement listed on the •schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof have been submited for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between •counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, defendant, subject to the approval of the Court:

> *4931.The merchandise marked “A” and initialed BOA by Examiner E. 0. Alfano on the invoices herein consists of Thiamine Hydrochloride exported from Denmark to the United States, during the period September 14, 1961 through May 17, 1963, which was appraised on the basis of foreign value, as that value is defined in Section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Section •8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938.

> 2.Thiamine Hydrochloride is on the final list promulgated by the Customs :Simplifications Act of 1956, published as T.D. 54521, in the Federal Register, issue of January 20,1958.

> 3.At the time of exportation of the merchandise marked “A” as aforesaid, the price at which such merchandise was freely offered for sale and sold to all purchasers in the principal market of Denmark, in the usuhl wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trg.de, for exportation to the United States, including the cost for all containers and coverings of whatever nature and •all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in •condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was:

> Period ■Dutiable value Basis

> :9/14/61 to 11/9/61 U.S. $16.50 per kilo, CIF Export value

> 11/14/61 to 12/30/61 U.S. $16.25 per kilo, CIF Export value

> .3/31/62 to 7/20/62 U.S. $15.00 per kilo, CIF Export value

> 8/28/62 to 10/31/62 U.S. $14.00 per kilo, CIF Export value

> 11/9/62 to 5/17/63 UjS. $13.00 per kilo, CIF Export value

> These values are higher than the foreign values for the periods indicated.

> 4.These appeals for reappraisement, as enumerated in Schedule 1, annexed hereto, may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such values for the respective periods of exportation were' as follows:

> Period Value

> 9/14/61 to 11/ 9/61 U.S. $16.50 per kilo, CIF

> 11/14/61 to 12/30/61 U.S. $16.25 per kilo, CIF

> 3/31/62 to 7/20/62 U.S. $15.00 per kilo, CIF

> 8/28/62 to 10/31/62 U.S. $14.00 per kilo, CIF

> 11/ 9/62 to 5/17/63 U.S. $13.00 per kilo, CIF

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 99(a)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the annual report of Furniture  Brands  International,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending  December 31, 2002
as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, W. G. Holliman,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company. of the Company.



                                   /s/  W. G. Holliman, Jr.
                                  ------------------------------------------
                                   W. G. Holliman
                                   Title:  Chief Executive Officer
                                   Furniture Brands International, Inc.
                                   March 25, 2003
IMPROVE Monitoring Data 2000-2004

Site Method Year N

SO4 

Extinction

NO3 

Extinction

OMC 

Extinction

EC 

Extinction

Soil 

Extinction

LOST1 NIA 2000 19 19.98 15.96 17.78 4.49 0.85

LOST1 NIA 2001 24 21.52 29.33 9.19 2.84 0.72

LOST1 NIA 2002 24 20.14 23.33 7.58 2.26 0.5

LOST1 NIA 2003 24 18.57 19.4 9.15 2.4 0.63

LOST1 NIA 2004 24 26.78 26.71 11.57 2.22 0.41

Site Method Year N

SO4 

Extinction

NO3 

Extinction

OMC 

Extinction

EC 

Extinction

Soil 

Extinction

THRO1 NIA 2000 21 16.4 13.61 11.81 3.26 0.76

THRO1 NIA 2001 22 18.77 17.7 6.67 2.69 1.01

THRO1 NIA 2002 19 20.83 10.7 5.85 1.9 1.2

THRO1 NIA 2003 21 17.7 10.34 16.43 3.36 0.97

THRO1 NIA 2004 23 13.96 16.35 13.35 2.52 0.55
CM 

Extinction

SeaSalt 

Extinction

Total 

Particle 

Extinction

Nitrate

%

5.19 0 83.25 19.2%

4.75 0.87 93.22 31.5%

2.64 0.11 80.56 29.0%

4.35 0.05 78.55 24.7%

2.73 0.27 94.69 28.2%

CM 

Extinction

SeaSalt 

Extinction

Total 

Particle 

Extinction

Nitrate

%

5.61 0 72.45 18.8%

4.52 0 73.36 24.1%

5.58 0 65.06 16.4%

5.39 0 75.19 13.8%

2.99 0.35 73.07 22.4%
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM RELTEC'S 
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE 
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                      40,800,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              174,900,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,700,000
<INVENTORY>                                130,000,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           381,300,000
<PP&E>                                     185,300,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              47,400,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,047,800,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      206,900,000
<BONDS>                                    307,500,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        1,000,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       600,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 480,900,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,047,800,000
<SALES>                                    769,600,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           769,600,000
<CGS>                                      540,200,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              540,200,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           240,500,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             2,400,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,100,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (20,200,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                23,600,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (43,800,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (43,800,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.80)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.80)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
------------




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of SoftNet Technology Corp (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I James Farinella,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.



By: /s/ James Farinella
   -----------------------
   James Farinella
   Chief Executive Officer
   March 16, 2005
Before the Third Division,

February 3, 1945

No. 49995.

#### Protests 5721-K, etc., of Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From an examination of the records the court held the action of the collector to be presumptively correct. The protests were therefore overruled.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of American Banknote Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Steven G. Singer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                                     /s/ Steven G. Singer
                                                     ---------------------
                                                     Steven G. Singer
                                                     Chairman and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 30, 2004