# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 2- 27 64

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ St ev en Don ne ll e Co dy
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Ms . Jac ue li ne Newbu rn , Jai l Ad m in is tra to r, Cl arkCo un ty D et en ti on Cen te r; Ti m Pat te rs on , Chi ef Dep ut y , Cla rkCo un ty D et en ti on Cen te r; R ic k Lo y , Int eri m Jai l Adm in is tra to r, Cl arkCo un ty D et en ti on Cen te r; Da vi d Tu rn er, Sh eri ff, Cl ark

Co un ty; Raym on d M oo re, J ai le r
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- St ev en D. Cod y ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v.
Ja cu el in e Newb orn, J ai l Ad m in is tra to r, Cl arkCo un ty D et en ti on Cen te r; Ti m Pat te rs on , Chi ef Dep ut y , ClarkCo un ty D et en ti on Cen te r; R ic k Lo y , Jai l Adm in is tra to r, Cl arkCo un ty D et en ti on Cen te r; Da vi d Tu rn er, Sh eri ff, Cl ark Co un ty; Offic er Mo or e
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

----- ----- ----- ----- ----- -----St ev en Co dy
ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Ri ck Loy, Jai l Ad m in is tra to r; R ay W in sf ie ld , Chi ef Dep ut y ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co urt fo r th e Weste rnDis tri ctof Ark an sa s - Ho t Sp rin gs

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Apri l 1 1, 2 01 3 Fi le d: Apri l 1 6, 2 01 3 [Unpubl is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, BOW MAN, an d GRUENDER, Ci rcu itJu dg es
.

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.

In m at e St ev en Don ne ll e Co dy ap pe al s fro m th e or de r of th e Dis tri ct Co urt, 1

en te re d aft er an ev id en ti ary he ari ng , di sm is si ng hi s co ns ol id at ed 42 U.S.C. § 19 83 act io ns
. Upo n care fu l co ns id erat io n of Co dy’ s arg um en ts fo r rev ers al , we co nc lu de th at t h e D i st ric t Co urt pr op erl y en te red jud gm en t fo r th e de fen da nt s ba se d on th e he ari ng ev id en ce. See Hol de n v. Hirn er, 66 3 F.3 d 33 6, 3 4 0

– 4 2 ( 8t h Ci r. 20 11 )

The Hon or ab le Ro be rt T. Dawso n, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju dg e f or th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ct of Ark an sa s, ad op ti ng th e rep ort an d reco m m en d a t i o n of th e Hon or ab le Barry A. Bryant , Uni te d St at es Mag is tra te Ju dg e fo r th e W es te rn Dis tri ct of Arka ns as
. -2

-(d is cu ssi ng a pr et ria l de ta in ee’s fai lu re-t o- pr ot ect cl ai m ); St ory v. Norwoo d, 65 9 F.3 d

68 0, 68 4– 85 (8 th Ci r. 20 11 ) (rev ie win g fo r cl ear erro r a di st ric t co urt’s fin di ng s of fact m ad e fo ll owi ng an ev id en ti ary he ari ng , whi ch is th e equi va le nt of a be nc h tri al , a n d n o t in g th at cred ib il it y fin di ng s are vi rtu al ly un rev ie wab le on ap pe al ); Cro w v
. Mo nt go m ery, 40 3 F. 3d 59 8, 60 1– 02 (8 th Ci r. 20 05 ) (ex pl ai ni ng th at a pr et ria l de ta in ee’s co nd it io ns -o f-co nf in em en t cl ai m s are an al y zed un de r th e sa m e de li be rat ein di ffer en ce st an da rd as th os e br ou gh t by co nvi ct ed priso ne rs: th e de ta in ee m us t sh ow th at co nd it io ns po se d a subs ta nt ia l ris k of se rio us ha rm to hi s he al th or sa fety an d th at de fen da nt s kne w of b utwere d el ib erat el y in di ffer en t t o t hi s ri sk )

.
The jud gm en t of th e Dis tri ct Co urt is affi rm ed , an d Co dy’ s pe nd in g m ot io n is de ni ed

.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

-3

-