alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- News
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service Announces Key Leadership Change

# Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service Seeks Direct Express® Program Services

November 27, 2018	

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, seeks applications from qualified financial institutions to serve as a financial agent of the United States.  The selected financial agent(s) will provide Direct Express® debit card services nationwide to recipients of social security and other federal benefit payments. The agreement with the current financial agent ends in January 2020.  Applications must be received no later than 5:00 pm ET February 15, 2019.

More than 4.5 million individuals receive their social security, veterans, and other benefit payments electronically to a Direct Express® prepaid debit card, a Treasury-sponsored account designed for those who do not have bank accounts.  The Direct Express® program is an essential instrument for Treasury to comply with Federal law requiring electronic federal benefits payments.  For many cardholders, their federal benefit is the sole source of income and essential for basic living needs.  Direct Express® provides a safe, convenient, and reliable way to receive their benefit.

Treasury established the terms and conditions of the Direct Express® account in 2010, following a rulemaking and a review of public comments. Direct Express® accounts are not issued or held by Treasury.  While Treasury establishes the features and fees of the Direct Express® debit card, the accounts are issued and maintained by a financial institution, as required by statute.  Among other features, the account must be offered at a reasonable cost and with the same consumer protections as a traditional bank account, including fraud protections under Regulation E.

For more information, please visit: http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/directexpress To learn more about the Fiscal Service, visit fiscal.treasury.gov

Last modified 12/14/23
No. 60054.

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

protests 239920-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef or veal similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Analytics

FLETC All Website Data

All Web Site Data

Go to report 

FLETC.gov Web Performance Metrics Jan 1, 2020 - Jan 31, 2020

Total Visits

115,915

% of Total: 100.00% (115,915)

Avg. Visit Duration

00:02:25

Avg for View: 00:02:25 (0.00%)

Pageviews

390,161

% of Total: 100.00% (390,161)

Unique Visitors

85,716

% of Total: 100.00% (85,716)

Avg. Pages / Visit

3.37

Avg for View: 3.37 (0.00%)

Avg. Time on Page

00:01:01

Avg for View: 00:01:01 (0.00%)

Bounce Rate

48.90%

Avg for View: 48.90% (0.00%)

Top Pages

Page Title Pageviews

Bounce

Rate

Search the Training Catalog | FLET

C

90,837 26.53%

Welcome to FLETC | FLETC 39,203 38.57%

Glynco, Georgia | FLETC 15,665 40.29%

National Terrorism Advisory Syste m | FLETC

11,263 58.19%

Locations | FLETC 10,868 43.81%

State, Local & Tribal Law Enforcem

ent Training | FLETC

6,975 33.11%

Basic Programs | FLETC 6,650 31.65%

Resources | FLETC 6,375 51.26%

PEB Scores for Age and Gender | F

LETC

5,751 12.76%

Careers and Internships | FLETC 5,296 43.32%

Visits by Social Network

Social Network Sessions

Facebook 748

Twitter 43

LinkedIn 24

Instagram 11

reddit 7

Quora 6

YouTube 6

Yelp 3

Blogger 1

foursquare 1

Visits by Source

New vs. Returned Visitors

google (direct) bing

search.usa.gov usajobs.gov

Other

21.8% 59.4%

New Visitor Returning Visitor

18.7%

81.3%

© 2020 Google

All Users

100.00% Sessions
Analytics

FLETC All Website Data

All Web Site Data

Go to report 

FLETC.gov Search Performance Metrics Jan 1, 2020 - Jan 31, 2020

Visits to FLETC.gov

115,915

% of Total: 100.00% (115,915)

Total Internal Searches

0

% of Total: 0.00% (0)

Total External Searches (Google)

76,391

% of Total: 65.90% (115,915)

Top Internal Searches by Search Term

Search Term Total Unique Searches Organic Searches

There is no data for this view.

Top External Searches (Google - as reported)

Page Title Sessions

Welcome to FLETC | FLETC 10,855

National Terrorism Advisory System | F

LETC

9,666

Search the Training Catalog | FLETC 3,579

Glynco, Georgia | FLETC 2,908

FedBizOpps | FLETC 1,365

PEB Scores for Age and Gender | FLET

C

1,356

Customs and Border Protection, Officer

Basic Training | FLETC

1,352

Execution of a Search Warrant (I) (MP

3) | FLETC

1,285

Physical Efficiency Battery (PEB) | FLET

C

1,189

Criminal Investigator Training Program

| FLETC

994

New vs. Returned Visitors

Avg. Visits per Visitor

New Visitor Returning Visitor

18.7%

81.3%

1 2 Other

18.8%

12.4%

68.7%

© 2020 Google

All Users

100.00% Sessions
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4054 

To require entities to meet minimum cybersecurity standards to be eligible 

for Medicare accelerated and advance payment programs if the reason 

for the need for such payments is due to a cybersecurity incident. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2024 

Mr. WARNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require entities to meet minimum cybersecurity standards 

to be eligible for Medicare accelerated and advance payment programs if the reason for the need for such payments is due to a cybersecurity incident. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Care Cyberse5 curity Improvement Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4054 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF THE MEDICARE HOSPITAL AC2 CELERATED PAYMENT PROGRAM. 

3 Section 1815(e)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 1395g(e)(3)) is amended— 

5 (1) by inserting ‘‘(A)’’ after ‘‘(3)’’; 

6 (2) by inserting ‘‘subparagraph (B) and’’ after 

7 ‘‘Subject to’’; and 

8 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub9 paragraph: 

10 ‘‘(B) Beginning on the date that is 2 years 

11 after the date of enactment of the Health Care Cy12 bersecurity Improvement Act of 2024, if the Sec13 retary determines that a cybersecurity incident led 

14 to the disruptions of the operations of such hos15 pital’s intermediary or the unusual circumstances to 

16 such hospital’s operation that resulted in such sig17 nificant cash flow problems, accelerated payments 

18 shall not be made to such hospital under subpara19 graph (A) unless— 

20 ‘‘(i) such hospital meets minimum cyberse21 curity standards, as determined by the Sec22 retary; and 

23 ‘‘(ii) in the case of operations of such hos24 pital’s intermediary, such intermediary meets 

25 minimum cybersecurity standards, as deter26 mined by the Secretary.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 4054 IS

1 SEC. 3. MODIFICATION OF THE MEDICARE PART B AD2 VANCE PAYMENT PROGRAM. 

3 Beginning on the date that is 2 years after the date 

4 of enactment of this Act, in the event of a cybersecurity 

5 incident, as determined by the Secretary of Health and 

6 Human Services, leading to the making of payments pur7 suant to the program described in section 421.214 of title 

8 42, Code of Federal Regulations (or any successor regula9 tion), such payments shall not be made to a provider of 

10 services or supplier unless— 

11 (1) such provider of services or supplier meets 

12 minimum cybersecurity standards, as determined by 

13 the Secretary; and 

14 (2) in the case of such provider’s or supplier’s 

15 intermediary being the target of such incident, such 

16 intermediary meets minimum cybersecurity stand17 ards, as determined by the Secretary. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

VICTOR S. HALTOM

Attorney at Law

State Bar No. 155157

428 J Street, Suite 350

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 444-8663

Facsimile: 444-1546

e-mail: vshjah@aol.com

Attorney for Petitioner

GLENN CARROLL HOLSOME

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 IN AND FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLENN CARROLL HOLSOME, ) CIV-S-04-0924 LKK GGH P

)

Petitioner, ) ORDER

)

v. )

)

DAVE RUNNELS, Warden, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

________________________________ )

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner’s application for an enlargement of

time until May 12, 2006, to file an exhaustion petition in state court, is granted. 

DATE: 5/8/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_______________________________

HON. GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States Magistrate Judge

hols0924.po

Case 2:04-cv-00924-LKK-CHS Document 31 Filed 05/08/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

June 25, 1968

No. P68/272.

protests 63/11168, etc. (Los Angeles)

#### Castelazo and Associates, a/c Marbro Lamp Company et al. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wall-hanging fixtures similar in all material respects to the wrought-iron ornaments the subject of *Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 112, C.D. 2289) and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of wall-hanging ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alpine Importers of Calif.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 81, C.D. 2555), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DUARTE BLAMO DAVIES : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL : NO. 02-4459

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2002, upon

consideration of the Motion for Appointment of Counsel Under the

Criminal Justice Act of § 2441 petitioner Duarte Blamo Davies,

the Court having already made a finding that Davies is indigent

and granted his application for leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 6)

is GRANTED;

2. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A, the Defender

Association, Federal Division, is APPOINTED to represent Davies

in his petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. §

2241;

3. Davies is granted LEAVE to file an amended habeas

petition through counsel by September 16, 2002; and

4. The Government shall not respond to Davies'

petition by September 20, 2002, as required by our August 5, 2002

Order, as Paragraph 2 of our August 5th Order is AMENDED to read

that "The Government shall RESPOND to the amended habeas petition

by October 11, 2002."

BY THE COURT:

______________________

Stewart Dalzell, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04459-SD Document 10 Filed 08/14/2002 Page 1 of 1
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 10/9/2023 1

Suit to Keep Polls Open Later Unsuccessful 

Because It Was Filed Less Than an Hour 

Before the Polls Closed 

Bernie 2020 v. Logan 

(Consuelo B. Marshall, C.D. Cal. 2:20-cv-2096) 

A suit filed after 7:00 p.m. to keep polls open after 8:00 because of 

long lines was unsuccessful because it was not assigned to a judge 

until two days later. 

Subject: Poll hours. Topics: Polling hours; primary election; case 

assignment; laches. 

A presidential campaign filed a federal complaint in the Central District of 

California against the registrar for Los Angeles County at 7:09 p.m. on 

March 3, 2020, seeking a court order keeping the polls open past 8:00 for a 

presidential primary election, alleging “wait times up to four hours to cast a 

ballot.”1

 With its complaint, the campaign filed an application for a temporary restraining order at 7:12.2

On March 5, the court assigned the case to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall.3

As it was too late to provide the plaintiff with the requested relief, Judge 

Marshall dismissed the case as moot.4

1. Complaint at 1, Bernie 2020 v. Logan, No. 2:20-cv-2096 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 3, 2020), 

D.E. 1; Minutes, id. (Mar. 5, 2020), D.E. 9. 

2. Temporary-Restraining-Order Application, id. (May 3, 2020), D.E. 2; Minutes, supra

note 1. 

3. Notice, Bernie 2020, No. 2:20-cv-2096 (C.D. Cal. May 5, 2020), D.E. 6; Minutes, supra

note 1. 

4. Minutes, supra note 1.
FILER

27
age gun te WHE .
OUR
ae sights ae Fano
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
WESTERN DIVISION
United States of America, Case No. 3:06cr719
Plaintiff(s)
v. SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTION

Mohammad Zaki Amawi, et al.,

Defendant(s)

You are being provided with Exhibit Books which contain government exhibits to assist you
in your deliberations. These books contain photocopies and/or photographs of some of the actual
evidence in the case. Should you wish to examine any of the actual evidence (for example, a
telephone or a book), please indicate in a note to the court which exhibit(s) you would like to review.

Certain evidence in the case will need to be reviewed in the courtroom. This evidence
includes audio/video recordings, other videos admitted into evidence, and any of the computer
evidence admitted in the case. Should you wish to review any such evidence, please indicate in a
note to the court. Your note should include descriptive information such as a date, 1D or exhibit
number if known, participants in the conversation, and a general description of the topic discussed.

- : C .

James G. Carr
Chief Judge
No. 67843.

#### Reliance Int’l Mfg., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 60/8984 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic fishes and plantlike forms similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67011, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

April 22, 1960

No. 64108.

protests 137809-K, etc. (Honolulu, Minneapolis, Portland, Oreg., and Seattle).

#### Hawaii Liquor Company, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH DAVID VINCZE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0591 FCD KJM P

vs.

SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 7, 2006, the court recommended that this

action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has filed

objections to the court’s findings and recommendations. In light of those objections, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The court’s February 7, 2006 findings and recommendations are vacated;

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to re-serve plaintiff with a copy of this

court’s May 16, 2005 order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint (docket #12) and a copy of the

court’s form complaint for violations of civil rights alleged by prisoners under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ;

and

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00591-FCD-KJM Document 20 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days within which to comply with the May 16, 2005

order. Plaintiff’s failure to do so will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed

without prejudice.

DATED: April 25, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

vinc0591.vfrs

Case 2:04-cv-00591-FCD-KJM Document 20 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), William F. Truscott, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Ross P. Palacios, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)              The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)              The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/   William F. Truscott |                            |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Name:                     | William   F. Truscott           |   |
| Title:                    | Chief   Executive Officer       |   |
|                      | (Principal   Executive Officer) |   |
| Date:                     | February 23, 2011     |   |

 

 
| /s/   Ross P. Palacios |                            |
|------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Name:                  | Ross   P. Palacios              |   |
| Title:                 | Chief   Financial Officer       |   |
|                   | (Principal   Financial Officer) |   |
| Date:                  | February 23, 2011     |   |

 

----
July 15, 2003

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of CEC Industries, Corp., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending March
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report"),
I, Brian Dvorak, Chairman of the Board, and President, of the Company,
certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18
U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
    material respects, the financial condition and result of
    operations of the Company.



                                            /s/ Brian Dvorak
                             -------------------------------------------
                                             Brian Dvorak
                                          Chief Financial Officer
No. 49152.

#### Petition 6311-R of F. & R. Lazarus & Co. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared at the trial that due to the war the merchandise in question was compelled to be shipped from a different point than usual, and that in this exceptional case the inland freight was a dutiable item. The court was of the opinion that the entry was made in good faith. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 58928.

protests 242955-K and 242956-K (New York).

#### J. Ossola Co., Inc., and Joseph L. Sclafani, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fontana Hollywood Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1503), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 8/26/2023 1

Unsuccessful Challenge to Straight-Ticket Voting 

Meyer v. Texas (Kenneth M. Hoyt, S.D. Tex. 4:10-cv-3860) 

An independent write-in candidate for Congress filed a pro se federal 

complaint challenging the constitutionality of state election laws favoring party candidates, including straight-ticket voting. The district 

judge concluded that the complaint did not allege a constitutional 

violation, and the state laws served the state’s interest in regulating 

elections. 

Subject: Voting procedures. Topics: Pro se party; write-in 

candidate. 

On Friday, October 15, 2010, an independent write-in candidate for Congress 

filed a pro se federal complaint in the Southern District of Texas challenging 

the constitutionality of state election laws favoring party candidates.1

 The 

complaint included a prayer for a temporary restraining order against 

straight-ticket voting.2

 The plaintiff filed an amended complaint and request 

for a temporary restraining order on Monday.3 The court set the case for a 

telephone conference on Wednesday.4

Judge Kenneth M. Hoyt denied the plaintiff immediate relief on October 

22.5 “The fact that early voters would be disenfranchised were an injunction or 

restraining order to issue is sufficient cause to deny the plaintiff’s request.”6

On May 11, 2011, Judge Hoyt dismissed the complaint.7

The Texas Election Code does not prevent the plaintiff from being placed on 

the ballot, nor does it unconstitutionally burden him. The contested laws 

merely serve to: (1) cause the plaintiff’s supporters to write his name on the 

ballot rather than to check a box beside his name; (2) prevent him from being 

the first candidate listed on the ballot; and (3) require that he obtain petition 

signatures from non-primary voters. None of these facts amount to constitutional violations. Furthermore, even if he had properly alleged any constitutional burden, that slight burden would be outweighed by the state’s important interests in regulating elections.8

An appeal was dismissed for lack of prosecution.9

1. Complaint, Meyer v. Texas, No. 4:10-cv-3860 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 15, 2010), D.E. 1; see Temporary-Restraining-Order Denial at 1, id. (Oct. 20, 2010), D.E. 10. 

2. Complaint, supra note 1, at 5. 

3. Amended Complaint, Meyer, No. 4:10-cv-3860 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 18, 2010), D.E. 4; see 

Order, id. (Oct. 20, 2010), D.E. 6 (granting permission for an amended complaint). 

4. Notice, id. (Oct. 18, 2010), D.E. 2. 

5. Temporary-Restraining-Order Denial, supra note 1. 

6. Id. at 3; see also id. at 1 (observing that “ballots for the November 2 election have been 

printed and early voting commenced on October 18. As well, ballots have been mailed to military personnel serving overseas and locally to citizens who desire to vote by mail.”). 

7. Opinion, Meyer, No. 4:10-cv-3860 (S.D. Tex. May 11, 2011), D.E. 16, 2011 WL 1806524. 

8. Id. at 4. 

9. Order, Meyer v. Texas, No. 11-20512 (5th Cir. Aug. 1, 2011); see Order, id. (Jan. 6, 2012) 

(denying a motion to reopen the appeal).
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 41 

To reauthorize the READ Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 24 (legislative day, JANUARY 3), 2023 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the READ Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘READ Act Reauthor5 ization Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION. 

7 Section 4(a) of the Reinforcing Education Account8 ability in Development Act (division A of Public Law 115– 

9 56; 22 U.S.C. 2151c note) is amended by striking ‘‘during 

10 the following five fiscal years’’ and inserting ‘‘during the 

11 following ten fiscal years’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Before the Second Division,

July 14, 1944

No. 49626.

#### Protests 532281-G, etc., of Seaboard Foreign Trading Co. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony adduced at the triai showed that certain of the items in question consist of hats similar in all material respects to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim at only 25 percent ad valorem was sustained as to" those items.