2404 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 14, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

or material that the Bureau considers 

unsuitable for posting. 

You may also view copies of this 

proposed rule, all related petitions, 

maps and other supporting materials, 

and any electronic or mailed comments 

that TTB receives about this proposal by 

appointment at the TTB Information 

Resource Center, 1310 G Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20005. You may also 

obtain copies at 20 cents per 8.5- × 11- 

inch page. Contact TTB’s information 

specialist at the above address or by 

telephone at 202–453–2270 to schedule 

an appointment or to request copies of 

comments or other materials. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act 

TTB certifies that this proposed 

regulation, if adopted, would not have 

a significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The proposed regulation imposes no 

new reporting, recordkeeping, or other 

administrative requirement. Any benefit 

derived from the use of an AVA name 

would be the result of a proprietor’s 

efforts and consumer acceptance of 

wines from that area. Therefore, no 

regulatory flexibility analysis is 

required. 

Executive Order 12866 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action as defined by 

Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 

1993. Therefore, no regulatory 

assessment is required. 

Drafting Information 

Karen A. Thornton of the Regulations 

and Rulings Division drafted this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9 

Wine. 

Proposed Regulatory Amendment 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, TTB proposes to amend title 

27, chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal 

Regulations, as follows: 

PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL 

AREAS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 9 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205. 

Subpart C—Approved American 

Viticultural Areas 

■ 2. Subpart C is amended by adding 

§ 9.____to read as follows: 

§ 9. Manton Valley. 

(a) Name. The name of the viticultural 

area described in this section is 

‘‘Manton Valley’’. For purposes of part 

4 of this chapter, ‘‘Manton Valley’’ is a 

term of viticultural significance. 

(b) Approved maps. The three United 

States Geological Survey (USGS) 

1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to 

determine the boundary of the Manton 

Valley viticultural area are titled: 

(1) Manton, CA, 1995; 

(2) Shingletown, CA, 1985 

(provisional); and 

(3) Grays Peak, CA, 1995. 

(c) Boundary. The Manton Valley 

viticultural area is located in Shasta and 

Tehama Counties in northern California. 

The boundary of the Manton Valley 

viticultural area is as described below: 

(1) The beginning point is on the 

Manton map, in the community of 

Manton, at the intersection of three 

unnamed light-duty roads known 

locally as Manton Road, Forward Road, 

and Rock Creek Road, section 21, T30N/ 

R1E. From the beginning point, proceed 

northerly, then northeasterly on Rock 

Creek Road approximately 0.8 mile to 

the road’s intersection with an unnamed 

light-duty road known locally as Wilson 

Hill Road, section 21, T30N/R1E; then 

(2) Proceed westerly, then northerly 

on Wilson Hill Road, crossing onto the 

Shingletown map, then continue 

westerly, then northerly, then 

northeasterly on the turning Wilson Hill 

Road, approximately 4 miles in total 

distance, to the road’s intersection with 

the marked power line in section 8, 

T30N/R1E; then 

(3) Proceed east-southeasterly along 

the marked power line, crossing onto 

the Manton map, approximately 1.1 

miles to the power line’s intersection 

with the Volta Powerhouse, section 16, 

T30N/R1E; then 

(4) From the Volta Powerhouse, 

proceed south-southeasterly 

(downstream) along an aqueduct and 

penstock, approximately 0.7 mile in 

total distance, to the penstock’s 

intersection with the North Fork of 

Battle Creek, section 16, T30N/R1E; 

then 

(5) Proceed north-northeasterly 

(upstream) along the North Fork of 

Battle Creek approximately 0.3 mile to 

the confluence of Bailey Creek, section 

15, T30N/R1E; then 

(6) Proceed east-northeasterly 

(upstream) along Bailey Creek 

approximately 2 miles to the creek’s 

intersection with an unnamed light-duty 

road known locally as Manton 

Ponderosa Way, section 11; T30N/R1E; 

then 

(7) Proceed southeasterly along 

Manton Ponderosa Way approximately 

1.8 miles to the road’s intersection with 

Rock Creek Road, and then proceed 

westerly on Rock Creek Road 

approximately 0.05 mile to the road’s 

intersection with an unnamed light-duty 

road known locally as Forwards Mill 

Road, section 19, T30N/R2E; then 

(8) Proceed easterly along Forwards 

Mill Road approximately 4.5 miles, 

crossing onto the Grays Peak map, to the 

road’s intersection with an unnamed 

light-duty road known locally as 

Forward Road, section 26, T30N/R2E; 

then 

(9) Proceed generally westerly along 

Forward Road approximately 4.8 miles, 

crossing onto the Manton map, to the 

road’s intersection with an unnamed 

light-duty road known locally as 

Ponderosa Way, section 31, T30N/R2E; 

then 

(10) Proceed southerly along 

Ponderosa Way approximately 1.7 miles 

to the road’s intersection with an 

unimproved road (Pacific Gas and 

Electric service road, approximately 

0.25 mile west-southwest of Bluff 

Springs), section 1, T29N/R1E; then 

(11) Proceed westerly along the 

unimproved road approximately 2.2 

miles to the road’s intersection with the 

South Battle Creek Canal, section 3, 

T29N/R1E; then 

(12) Proceed generally northwesterly 

(downstream) along the meandering 

South Battle Creek Canal approximately 

1.3 miles to the canal’s intersection with 

an unimproved road known locally as 

South Powerhouse Road, section 4, 

T29N/R1E; then 

(13) Proceed northerly along South 

Powerhouse Road approximately 2 

miles to the road’s intersection with an 

unnamed light-duty road known locally 

as Manton Road, section 21, T30N/R1E; 

then 

(14) Proceed easterly along Manton 

Road approximately 0.1 mile, returning 

to the beginning point. 

Signed: December 20, 2013. 

John J. Manfreda, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2014–00523 Filed 1–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–31–P?≤ 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R09–OAR–2013–0753; FRL–9905–28– 

Region 9] 

Revisions to the California State 

Implementation Plan, El Dorado 

County Air Quality Management 

District 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 9 / Tuesday, January 14, 2014 / Proposed Rules 2405 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

revisions to the El Dorado County Air 

Quality Management District 

(EDAQMD) portion of the California 

State Implementation Plan (SIP). These 

revisions concern negative declarations 

for volatile organic compound (VOC) 

source categories for the EDAQMD. We 

are proposing to approve these negative 

declarations under the Clean Air Act as 

amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). 

DATES: Any comments on this proposal 

must arrive by February 13, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, 

identified by docket number EPA–R09– 

OAR–2013–0753, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line 

instructions. 

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov. 

3. Mail or Deliver: Andrew Steckel 

(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, 

San Francisco, CA 94105–3901. 

Instructions: All comments will be 

included in the public docket without 

change and may be made available 

online at www.regulations.gov, 

including any personal information 

provided, unless the comment includes 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Information that 

you consider CBI or otherwise protected 

should be clearly identified as such and 

should not be submitted through 

www.regulations.gov or email. 

www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous 

access’’ system, and EPA will not know 

your identity or contact information 

unless you provide it in the body of 

your comment. If you send email 

directly to EPA, your email address will 

be automatically captured and included 

as part of the public comment. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: Generally, documents in the 

docket for this action are available 

electronically at www.regulations.gov 

and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 

Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, 

California 94105–3901. While all 

documents in the docket are listed at 

www.regulations.gov, some information 

may be publicly available only at the 

hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted 

material, large maps), and some may not 

be publicly available in either location 

(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy 

materials, please schedule an 

appointment during normal business 

hours with the contact listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415) 

947–4122, tong.stanley@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

proposal addresses the following 

negative declarations listed in Table 1: 

TABLE 1—SUBMITTED NEGATIVE DECLARATIONS

Local agency Title Adopted Submitted 

EDAQMD .......... EPA–450/2–78–015—Control of VOC Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources, 

Volume VI: Surface Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products.

12/11/12 09/30/13 

EDAQMD .......... EPA–450/2–77–022—Control of VOC Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning ............. 12/11/12 09/30/13 

EDAQMD .......... EPA–450/2–78–033—Control of VOC Emissions from Existing Stationary Sources, 

Volume VIII: Graphic Arts—Rotogravure and Flexography.

12/11/12 09/30/13 

In the Rules and Regulations section 

of this Federal Register, we are 

approving these negative declarations in 

a direct final action without prior 

proposal because we believe these 

negative declarations are not 

controversial. If we receive adverse 

comments, however, we will publish a 

timely withdrawal of the direct final 

rule and address the comments in a 

subsequent action based on this 

proposed rule. Please note that if we 

receive adverse comment on an 

amendment, paragraph, or section of 

this rule and if that provision may be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

we may adopt as final those provisions 

of the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

We do not plan to open a second 

comment period, so anyone interested 

in commenting should do so at this 

time. If we do not receive adverse 

comments, no further activity is 

planned. For further information, please 

see the direct final action. 

Dated: December 16, 2013. 

Jared Blumenfeld, 

Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

[FR Doc. 2014–00399 Filed 1–13–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[MB Docket No. 13–282; RM–11706; DA 13– 

2229] 

Radio Broadcasting Services; Bruce, 

Mississippi 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This document requests 

comments on a petition for rulemaking 

filed by Telesouth Communications, 

Inc., proposing the substitution of 

Channel 284A for vacant Channel 233A 

at Bruce, Mississippi to accommodate 

the contingently filed ‘‘hybrid’’ 

application for Station WTNM(FM), 

Water Valley, Mississippi. A staff 

engineering analysis indicates that 

Channel 284A can be allotted to Bruce 

consistent with the minimum distance 

separation requirements of the 

Commission’s rules with a site 

restriction 15.5 kilometers (9.6 miles) 

northeast of the community. The 

reference coordinates are 34–02–51 NL 

and 89–11–41 WL. See SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION. 

DATES: Comments must be filed on or 

before January 13, 2014, and reply 

comments on or before January 28, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: Secretary, Federal 

Communications Commission, 445 12th 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20554. In 

addition to filing comments with the 

FCC, interested parties should serve the 

petitioner as follows: M. Scott Johnson, 

Esq., Anne Goodwin Crump, Esq., 

Fletcher, Heald & Hildreth, P.L.C., 1300 

N. 17th Street, Eleventh Floor, 

Arlington, Virginia 22209. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–2700. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of 

Proposed Rule Making, MB Docket No. 

13–282, adopted November 21, 2013, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS