alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Security Reports: Users by Access Group (FPA)

To view the Users by Access Group (FPA) report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, select Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Security Reports, select Users by Access Group (FPA). The Users by Access 

Group (FPA) parameters page appears. Enter your search criteria.

• Select Yes or No for Report With Children

• Select Yes to generate a report that contains data for the selected OTC Endpoint as 

well as all of the lower level Endpoints. 

• Select No to generate a report that contains data only for the selected OTC 

Endpoint.

3. Select an OTC Endpoint to initiate the report. The Users by Access Group (FPA) preview 

page appears in a new window as shown in Figure 1.

Under Export as, you have the following options:

• Select PDF, Excel or Word format

• Select Download

Or

• Select Print PDF Report

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1. Users by Access Group (FPA) Preview Page

• For new users who have not logged into OTCnet yet, both the User Name and User 

ID values will be empty in the database and displayed as blank values on the 

preview page. 

• If your agency has over 50 endpoints and/or over 100 users, you must drill down to a 

lower level within your agency to run the report. Running the report at a lower level 

prevents the report from overloading. Overloading results in a report with no data 

output.

• TGA denotes a deposit processing OTC Endpoint.

• CHK denotes a check capture OTC Endpoint.

• M denotes a mapped accounting code; an open lock denotes access permission; 

and a closed lock denotes no access permission.

• CDC denotes card processing OTC Endpoint.

Select Previous to return to the previous page.

Application Tips

Additional Button
January 10, 1944

No. 49119.

Suit 4441.

#### *Hawley & Letzerich*v. *United States.*

affirmed. C. A. D. 258.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000053500
<NAME> JETRONICS INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                              10
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                       125
<INVENTORY>                                      7,751
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                13,001
<PP&E>                                           4,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,664
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,990
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,208
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         33
<COMMON>                                           370
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,621)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,990
<SALES>                                         25,194
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,194
<CGS>                                           23,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,357
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,744
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,907)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       280
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,187)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,187)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1572 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1572

 To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to provide that extraction of helium 
  from gas produced under a Federal mineral lease shall maintain the 
                lease as if the helium were oil and gas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2017

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Mineral Leasing Act to provide that extraction of helium 
  from gas produced under a Federal mineral lease shall maintain the 
                lease as if the helium were oil and gas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Helium Extraction Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. MAINTENANCE OF FEDERAL MINERAL LEASES BASED ON EXTRACTION OF 
              HELIUM.

    The first section of the Mineral Leasing Act (30 U.S.C. 181) is 
amended in fifth paragraph by inserting after ``purchaser thereof'' the 
following: ``, and that extraction of helium from gas produced from 
such lands shall maintain the lease as if the extracted helium were oil 
and gas''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 46 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 1 of 1

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 46

Dockets.Justia.com
No. P68/281.

protests 59/13103, etc. (Los Angles).

No. P68/282.

protests 59/23876, etc. (New York).

#### National Carloading et al. *v.*United States, Oxford Intnl. Corp. and National Carloading Corp. et al. v. United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *S. Hiller & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 79, C.D. 3082), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of The United States Code**

 

I, David W. Martin, the Senior Vice President, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 
|   | /s/   David W. Martin |
|--------|-----------------------|
|   | David   W. Martin     |
|   | May 16,   2011   |

 

----
# C_2017112EN.01003802.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/38

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 6 February 2017 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB

(Case T-645/16 R)

((Interim measures - Single Resolution Board - Single Resolution Fund - Ex-ante contributions - Application for stay of execution - No urgency))

(2017/C 112/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (SRB) (represented by: B. Meyring and S. Schelo, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the grant of interim measures as regards, firstly, a stay of execution of the decision of the Executive Session of the SRB (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) of 15 April 2016 concerning the ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund for 2016 and, secondly, an order that the SRB reimburse the ex-ante contributions paid by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is rejected. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is rejected.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4103 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to implement the anti-fraud and abuse recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 10, 2024 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to implement the anti-fraud and abuse recommendations of the Comptroller General of the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Terrorist 

5 and Narcotic Air Events Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF ANTI-TERRORIST AND NAR7 COTIC AIR EVENTS PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) IMPLEMENTATION.— 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4103 IS

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

2 after the date of enactment of this section, the Ad3 ministrator of the Federal Aviation Administration 

4 (in this section referred to as the ‘‘Administrator’’) 

5 shall implement the anti-fraud and abuse rec6 ommendations described in paragraph (2). 

7 (2) RECOMMENDATIONS DESCRIBED.—For pur8 poses of this section, the term ‘‘anti-fraud and abuse 

9 recommendations’’ means the recommendations set 

10 forth in the Government Accountability Office report 

11 entitled ‘‘Aviation: FAA Needs to Better Prevent, 

12 Detect, and Respond to Fraud and Abuse Risks in 

13 Aircraft Registration,’’ (dated March 25, 2020). 

14 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 60 days after the date 

15 on which the Administrator implements the recommenda16 tions under subsection (a), the Administrator shall submit 

17 to the Committees on the Judiciary and Commerce, 

18 Science, and Transportation of the Senate, the Commit19 tees on the Judiciary and Energy and Commerce of the 

20 House of Representatives, and the Caucus on Inter21 national Narcotics Control of the Senate a report on such 

22 implementation, including a description of any steps taken 

23 by the Administrator to complete such implementation. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NOS. WR-89,123-01 AND WR-89,123-02

EX P ARTE DANIEL ALBE RTO MONTOYA, Appli cant

ON AP P LICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NOS. W14-31191-R(A) AND W14- 31192-R(A ) IN THE 265T H DISTRICT COURT F ROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant filed these applications for writs of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district cler

k forwa rded them to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. Acc ording to the rec ord, the trial court held an evidentiar y hear ing on May 9, 2019, b u t the transcr ipt of the hear ing was not forwa

rded to this Court. Under Articl e 1 1

. 0 7 o f the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, a repor

ter is require d to transcr ibe a hear ing within fiftee n day s of its conclusion and then to immediately forwa

rd the transcr ipt to the district cler k in the county of conviction. Id

. at § 3(d). After rec eiving the transcr ipt, the district cler k is require d to forwa

rd it, among other things, to this Court. Id .; see also T E X . R. A P P . P. 73.4(b)( 4).2

The dist rict clerk s hall s er v e the reporter in Applicant’s case with a copy of t his order and then either forwa

rd to this Court the transcr ipt of the evidentiar y hear ing or cer

tify in writing that the repor ter has not transcr ibed the hear ing. The district cler k shall comply with this order within thirty day s from the da

te of this order

.
Filed: Apr il 9, 2020 Do not publish
No. 61779.

#### Frazar & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 310050-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GARY DEAN HEGLIN,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0770 DFL PAN P

vs.

D.L. RUNNELS, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner without counsel, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States

Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On June 8, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00770-DFL-PAN Document 7 Filed 09/12/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 8, 2005, are adopted in full; and 

2. Respondent’s September 22, 2004, motion to dismiss is granted.

DATED: 9/9/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00770-DFL-PAN Document 7 Filed 09/12/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Adelaide M. WALSH, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 01-3178.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 2001.

Order Vacated, See 2001 WL 456769.

ORDER

The petitioner having failed to pay the docketing fee required by Federal Circuit Rule 52(a)(1) within the time permitted by the rules, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED, for failure to prosecute in accordance with the rules.
Before the First Division,

August 29, 1949

No. 53520.

protests 75702-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gerstenzang Werner Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of beads, composed of galalith, alabaster beads, and white beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gerstenzang Werner Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 97, C. D. 1136), *Eitinger Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(17 id. 56, C. D. 1020), and *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 id. 50, C. D. 867), respectively. The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHILES OFFSHORE LLC CONTAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,813
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,013
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,975
<PP&E>                                         180,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 191,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,885
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   191,751
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,878
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,069
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,729)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4077 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4077

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 180 Steuart Street in San Francisco, California, as the ``Dianne 
                        Feinstein Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 8, 2024

Mr. Padilla (for himself and Ms. Butler) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
  at 180 Steuart Street in San Francisco, California, as the ``Dianne 
                        Feinstein Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIANNE FEINSTEIN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 180 Steuart Street in San Francisco, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dianne Feinstein Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dianne 
Feinstein Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Ingles Markets, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Brenda S. Tudor, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|/s/ Brenda S. Tudor          
|-----------------------------
|Brenda S. Tudor              
|Vice President of Finance and
|Chief Financial Officer      

December 22, 2003
----

Action brought on 20 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

(Case C-321/06)

(2006/C 212/46)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Enegren and G. Rozet, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period for the transposition of Directive 2002/14/EC into domestic law expired on 23 March 2005.

----

(1)  OJ L 80, p. 29.

----
No. 52258.

protests 125765-K, etc. (New York).

#### Loewengart & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

M ollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 AMENDED JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE

AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, 

et.al.,

CIV S-04-0778 MCE KJM

Plaintiffs,

v.

BILL LOCKER, et. al,

Defendants.

XX -- Decision by the Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues

have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED

THAT JUDGMENT IS HEREBYENTERED INFAVOROF PLAINTIFFS IN

ACCORDANCE WITH THE COURT'S ORDER OF OCTOBER 4, 2005.

Jack L. Wagner,

Clerk of the Court

ENTERED: October 6, 2005

by: /s/ M. Krueger________

 M. Krueger, Deputy Clerk

FILED

October 6, 2005

CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF

CALIFORNIA

DEPUTY CLERK

Case 2:04-cv-00778-MCE -KJM Document 72 Filed 10/06/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 52954.

#### Pittman-Moore Co. *v.*United States,

protest 138830-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the concentrated ox gall the subject of *G. D. Searle & Co.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.
No. 52927.

#### Monteverde & Parodi, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 43086-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protest was overruled in all other respects.