46612 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 137 / Monday, July 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and, 

• Does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this final clean data 

determination does not have tribal 

implications as specified by Executive 

Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 

2000) because the SIP obligations 

discussed herein do not apply to Indian 

Tribes, and thus will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by September 16, 

2016. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements (see section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Oxides of nitrogen, Ozone, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

Dated: June 30, 2016. 

Deborah Jordan, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX. 

Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for Part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart F—California 

■ 2. Section 52.282 is amended by 

adding paragraph (h) to read as follows: 

§ 52.282 Control strategy and regulations: 

Ozone 

* * * * * 

(h) Determination of attainment. EPA 

has determined that, as of August 17, 

2016, the San Joaquin Valley 1-hour 

ozone nonattainment area has attained 

the 1-hour ozone standard, based upon 

sufficient, quality-assured and certified 

ambient air quality monitoring data for 

2012–2014. 

[FR Doc. 2016–16792 Filed 7–15–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0051; FRL—9949– 

18–Region 10] 

Extension of the Attainment Date for 

the Oakridge, Oregon 24-hour PM2.5

Nonattainment Area 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is finalizing its decision 

to grant a 1-year extension of the 

attainment date for the Oakridge, 

Oregon nonattainment area to meet the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS from 

December 31, 2015 to December 31, 

2016, on the basis that the State has met 

the criteria for such an extension under 

the Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: This final rule is effective August 

17, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R10–OAR–2016–0051. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

(CBI) or other information the disclosure 

of which is restricted by statute. Certain 

other material, such as copyrighted 

material, is not placed on the Internet 

and will be publicly available only in 

hard copy form. Publicly available 

docket materials are available either 

electronically through http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air Planning Unit, Office of Air and 

Waste, EPA Region 10, 1200 Sixth 

Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101. The EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the individual listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

view the hard copy of the docket. You 

may view the hard copy of the docket 

Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 

4:00 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

information please contact Justin 

Spenillo at (206) 553–6125, 

spenillo.justin@epa.gov or by using the 

above EPA, Region 10 address. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background Information 

II. Final Action 

III. Statutory and Executive Orders Review 

I. Background Information 

On May 18, 2016, the EPA proposed 

to grant a 1-year extension of the 

attainment date for the Oakridge, 

Oregon nonattainment area to meet the 

2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS from 

December 31, 2015 to December 31, 

2016, on the basis that the State has met 

the criteria for such an extension under 

the CAA (81 FR 31202). An explanation 

of the CAA requirements, a detailed 

analysis of the submittal, and the EPA’s 

reasons for proposing approval were 

provided in the notice of proposed 

rulemaking, and will not be restated 

here. The public comment period for 

this proposed rule ended on June 17, 

2016. The EPA received no comments 

on the proposal. 

II. Final Action 

The EPA finds that the State has met 

the criteria for receiving a 1-year 

extension to the Moderate area 

attainment date for the 2006 PM2.5

NAAQS for the Oakridge NAA as 

provided in section 188(d) of the Act. 

The State is implementing the 

requirements and commitments in the 

applicable attainment plan for the PM2.5

NAAQS in the area, and the 98th 

percentile 24-hour PM2.5 air quality 

value for 2015 is below 35 mg/m3. 

Accordingly, the State has established 

that it meets the criteria of section 

188(d) as the EPA interprets those 

requirements for purposes of the 2006 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 137 / Monday, July 18, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 46613 

PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA therefore 

exercises the discretion granted to the 

Administrator by section 188(d) of the 

CAA to extend the Moderate area 

attainment date for the Oakridge NAA 

from December 31, 2015 to December 

31, 2016. 

III. Statutory and Executive Orders 

Review 

Under the Clean Air Act, the 

Administrator is required to approve a 

SIP submission that complies with the 

provisions of the Act and applicable 

Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 

40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP 

submissions, the EPA’s role is to 

approve state choices, provided that 

they meet the criteria of the Clean Air 

Act. Accordingly, this action merely 

approves state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and does not impose 

additional requirements beyond those 

imposed by state law. For that reason, 

this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on any 

Indian reservation land or in any other 

area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and it will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. The EPA will 

submit a report containing this action 

and other required information to the 

U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 

Representatives, and the Comptroller 

General of the United States prior to 

publication of the rule in the Federal 

Register. A major rule cannot take effect 

until 60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean 

Air Act, petitions for judicial review of 

this action must be filed in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the 

appropriate circuit by September 16, 

2016. Filing a petition for 

reconsideration by the Administrator of 

this final rule does not affect the finality 

of this action for the purposes of judicial 

review nor does it extend the time 

within which a petition for judicial 

review may be filed, and shall not 

postpone the effectiveness of such rule 

or action. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

oxides, Volatile organic compounds. 

Dated: July 7, 2016. 

Michelle L. Pirzadeh, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10. 

[FR Doc. 2016–16789 Filed 7–15–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Office of the Secretary 

45 CFR Part 92 

[HHS–OCR–2015–0006] 

RIN 0945–AA02 

Nondiscrimination in Health Programs 

and Activities; Correction 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OS), 

HHS. 

ACTION: Final rule; correction. 

SUMMARY: This document corrects a 

typographical error that appeared in the 

final rule published in the Federal 

Register on May 18, 2016, entitled 

‘‘Nondiscrimination in Health Programs 

and Activities.’’ 

DATES: This correction is effective on 

July 18, 2016. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Section 1557 mailbox at 1557@hhs.gov. 

Eileen Hanrahan, (800) 368–1019 or 

(800) 537–7697 (TDD). 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

In FR Doc. 2016–11458 of May 18, 

2016 (81 FR 31375) (hereinafter referred 

to as the Section 1557 final rule) there 

is a typographical error that is discussed 

in the ‘‘Summary of Error,’’ and further 

identified and corrected in the 

‘‘Correction of Error’’ section below. The 

provision in this correction document is 

effective as if it had been included in 

the Section 1557 final rule published in 

the Federal Register on May 18, 2016. 

II. Summary of Error 

On page 31473, in Appendix A to Part 

92—Sample Notice Informing 

Individuals About Nondiscrimination 

and Accessibility Requirements and 

Sample Nondiscrimination Statement: 

Discrimination is Against the Law, the 

telephone number provided for 

assistance with filing a civil rights 

complaint with the U.S. Department of 

Health and Human Services, Office for 

Civil Rights was incorrect. The correct 

telephone number is 800–368–1019. 

III. Correction of Error 

In FR Doc. 2016–11458 of May 18, 

2016 (81 FR 31375), make the following 

correction: 

1. On page 31473, first column, first 

full paragraph, line 22, ‘‘1–800–868– 

1019’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1–800–368– 

1019’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with RULES