alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON, No. 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB P 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

 

D.L. RUNNELS, et al., 

 ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 Defendants. AD TESTIFICANDUM

 / 

Kerry D. Thrower, CDCR # J-05979, a necessary and material witness in a jury trial in 

this case on February 8, 2016, is confined in San Quentin State Prison, in the custody of the 

Warden. In order to secure this inmate’s attendance it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus 

ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before Judge Troy L. 

Nunley at the U. S. District Court, Courtroom No. 2, 501 I Street, 15th Floor, Sacramento, 

California 95814, on Monday, February 8, 2016, at 9:00 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court, 

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to participate in a 

settlement conference at the time and place above, until completion of the settlement 

conference or as ordered by Judge Claire. 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is 

ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden, San Quentin State Prison, San Quentin, CA 94974: 

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before Judge Nunley at the 

time and place above, until completion of the trial in this matter, or as ordered by the court. 

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of the inmate 

and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ. 

DATED: December 17, 2015. 

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 295 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JILCO INDUSTRIES, INC. FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JULY
31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,049
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,049
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,049
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          160,272
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       749,950
<OTHER-SE>                                   (908,173)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,049
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,927
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,078
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                       800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (49,805)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,805)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM JOSTENS,
INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                     2,639
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,198
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (6,884)
<INVENTORY>                                     98,493
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               257,500
<PP&E>                                         210,925
<DEPRECIATION>                               (143,282)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 383,847
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          245,747
<BONDS>                                          3,881
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,888
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   383,847
<SALES>                                        277,118
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               277,118
<CGS>                                          141,493
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,493
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,473
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (4,330)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     26
<INCOME-TAX>                                       829
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (803)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (803)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02


</TABLE>
(Reap. Dec. 10385)

Entry No. 11919, etc.

#### R.C.A. Victor Mexicana et al. *v.*United States

(Decided December 4, 1962)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiffs.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OlxveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise which is the subject of the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of phonograph records exported from Mexico after April 1, 1959.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that phonograph records are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

> *472IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for re-appraisement listed in Schedule B, are hereby submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the phonograph records in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the prices shown in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Before the Third Division,

March 6, 1946

No. 50932.

#### Protests 44115-K, etc., of J. L. Hudson Co. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 56 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 1 of 2

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 56

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 56 Filed 08/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
# Sum of Change -Bulletin 2015-04

# Additional Information
Proposed USSGL Account 436000 and Transaction Code for FY 2016

Account Title: Appropriation Purpose Fulfilled - Balance Not Available

Account Number: 436000

Normal Balance: Credit 

Definition: The portion of the unobligated balances in a no-year Treasury account where the amount is no longer available for 

obligation since the purposes for which the appropriation was enacted has been carried out. This account does not close at the end of 

the year.

Justification: USSGL will be used when the purpose has been carried out but there is not explicit enacted language to withdraw the 

funding and return to Treasury. It reclassifies the amount from an available unobligated balance to an unavailable unobligated balance

and will remain open. In this case, 31 U.S.C 1555 is not applicable because the appropriation account is not closing. 

Attribute Table:

No. USSGL Account Title Anticipated Budg/

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/End

Debit/

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

436000 Appropriation Purpose Fulfilled -

Balance Not Available

N B C B/E D/C

Program

Rpt Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U N U N

Avail 

Time

BEA Cat Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact

Indicator

Cohort 

Yr

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Non

Fed

Trading 

Ptnr

Trading 

Ptnr 

Main

PY 

Adj

Program 

Indicator

P/X

Proposed USSGL account 436000 and transaction code IRC Handout August 6, 2015 
CrosswalksImpacted:

USSGL 

Account 

Number

Balance 

Sheet

Net 

Cost

Net 

Position

Custodial 

Activity

SF 133 P&F SBR Reclassified 

Balance 

Sheet

Reclassified 

Statement 

of Net Cost

Reclassified 

Statement 

of Changes 

in Net 

Position

436000 N/A N/A N/A N/A Lines

1000, 

1020, 

1031

Line 

1000, 

1020, 

1031

Line 

1000, 

1020, 

1043

N/A N/A N/A

F147 To reclassify the portion of unobligated available balances to unobligated unavailable in a no-year Treasury account where the amount is no 

longer available for obligation since the purposes for which the appropriation was enacted has been carried out.

Comment: USSGL account remains open at year end. See Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-11 for additional 

guidance.

Budgetary Entry

Debit 445000 Unapportioned Authority

Debit 451000 Apportionments

Debit 461000 Allotments - Realized Resources

Debit 462000 Unobligated Funds Exempt From Apportionment

 Credit 436000 Appropriation Purpose Fulfilled - Balance Not Available

Proprietary Entry

None

Proposed USSGL account 436000 and transaction code IRC Handout August 6, 2015
Before the Third Division,

June 19, 1963

No. 67836.

#### S. H. Kress & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/6400 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain merchandise consists, in fact, of 127% dozen each of items 11311 and 11312, each consisting of 2 pieces, said articles were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under the provision in paragraph 211, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877), for earthenware articles which are not tableware, valued under $3 per dozen pieces. Other articles, stipulated to consist of 127% dozen each of items 11313, 11318, 11319, and 11320; 191% dozen each of item 11314; and 63% dozen of items 11315, 11316, and 11317, were held dutiable at 45 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 212, as modified, *supra,*for porcelain articles which are not tableware. The collector was directed to re-liquidate the entry and refund duty on quantities in excess of the above.
No. 51986.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 72505-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of earthenware articles the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Copeland & Thomson, Inc.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833) and *Johnson Bros.*v. *United States*(15 id. 113, C. D. 955). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAURICE DAVIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0707 FCD CMK P

vs.

STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

On July 26, 2005, plaintiff filed “objection to defendant’s notice of motion and

motion to dismiss; memorandum of points and authorities.” That document was not served on

defendant. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted to the court for consideration must

be served on defendant. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to be served electronically are usually

served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has filed a document with the court on

behalf of any defendant, then documents submitted by plaintiff must be served on that attorney

and not on the defendant. Every document submitted conventionally to the court (e.g., by a

prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate stating the date an accurate copy of the

document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and the address to which it was mailed. See

Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00707-FCD-CMK Document 22 Filed 08/04/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s July 26, 2005 “objection to defendant’s notice

of motion and motion to dismiss; memorandum of points and authorities” on counsel for

defendant and shall file proper proof of said service. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to comply 

with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff is further cautioned that

failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in this action properly, and failure to include a

proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a recommendation that this action be

dismissed.

DATED: August 3, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00707-FCD-CMK Document 22 Filed 08/04/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000053500
<NAME> JETRONIC INDUSTRIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                             498
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                        24
<INVENTORY>                                      5,156
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,106
<PP&E>                                           3,767
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,329
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,381
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,596
<BONDS>                                          3,856
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           361
<OTHER-SE>                                       (678)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,407
<SALES>                                         23,671
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,671
<CGS>                                           19,747
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,118
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    576
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (9)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                585
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .16
        


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

June 19, 1968

No. P68/269.

protests 66/19816, etc. (New York).

#### D.N. & E. Walter Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Kao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of folding wood doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Gitkin Co.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Metals transport in theSacramento River, California, 1996-1997**
 
Volumes: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.42/4:00-4002 | I19.42/4:99-4286
Item Number:0624-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:000837432
 
February 11, 2020
[PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16

- 12279

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:16

- cv

- 00191

- KD

- M

VERNON MADISON,

Petitioner

– Appellant,

versus

COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent

– Appellee.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Alabama

________________________

(January 24, 2018 )

Before WILSON, MARTIN, and JORDAN, Circuit Judges.

M ARTIN, Circuit Judge :

T he United States Supreme Court reversed our March 15, 2017 opinion in

this matter on November 6, 2017 and denied a Petition for R ehearing on January 8,

2018 . O ur opinion is therefore VACATE D, and this action is remand ed to the

District Court for reinstatement of the judgment denying habeas relief

.

Case: 16-12279 Date Filed: 01/24/2018 Page: 1 of 1
#### Maurice ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Roger PHILLIPS, M.D., Head Physician/Medical Director; Abdul Jamalu-deen, M.D., Physician; Correctional Medical Services, Jails Medical Company, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-6112.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 18, 2001.

Maurice Anderson, pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Maurice Anderson, a Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying *124relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *Anderson v. Phillips,*No. CA-00-868-2 (E.D.Va. Dec. 13, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Training
- Treasury General Account (TGA) Initiative and Electronic Solutions

# Treasury General Account (TGA) Initiative and Electronic Solutions

Audience:

Open to all federal employees

----

Location:

Online

----

Duration:

                                    Thursday, December 8, 2022 | 1:00 pm - 3:00 pm ET

----

Cost:

Free

----

Hosted by:

Revenue Collections Management

----

Point of Contact:

arm@fiscal.treasury.gov

## Event Details:

Banks are leaving the TGA  Network – What’s Next? The Revenue Collections Management (RCM) Agency Relationship Management (ARM)  Team is excited to host an online event focusing on the Bureau’s cutting- edge  collection platforms, supporting the Bureau’s strategic objective to digitize  your agency’s paper processes.  

**Topics will include:**

- Mobile Applications (Mobile Point of Sale, Public App etc.)
- Credit Gateway (Online Bill Payment, ACH, Fedwire etc.)
- Pay.gov (Hosted Collection Pages, eBilling etc.)
- Communications Playbook and more

Please register using the form below.

### Registration

Fields marked with an asterisk(*) are required.
# sec6_rsonp_2022

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSOCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BAugust 2021
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

LVD Contents Report

To view an LVD Contents report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, click Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Business Reports, click LVD Contents Report. The LVD Contents Reports

parameters page appears.

3. Enter the search criteria for the report you would like to view.

Under Report Filters, complete the following:

• Select a Transaction Type

• Select a Trade Status

• Click Received Date or Captured Date

• Enter For Account

• Enter the User Defined Field 1

• Enter the Bank Routing Number

• Trade Status represents the status of the verification records (All, Cleared, Dynamic, 

Suspend, Denied, Blocked).

• CHK denotes a check capture OTC Endpoint; TGA denotes a deposit processing 

OTC Endpoint; M denotes a mapped accounting code; an open lock denotes 

access permission; and a closed lock denotes no access permission.

4. Click an OTC Endpoint to initiate the report. The LVD Contents Report preview page 

appears in a new window as shown in Figure 1.

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1: LVD Contents Report Preview Page

5. Under Export as, 

• Select a PDF, Excel or Word

• Click Download

Or

• Click Print PDF Report

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

Additional Button