alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Part 1 Fiscal Year 2019 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section III

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Account Transaction Categories

TRANSACTION

CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION

Bulletin No. 2019-10 III AC - 1 June 2019

A. Funding

100 - 399 Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections

400 - 699 Authority Transfers

700 - 799 Reimbursables and Other Income

B. Disbursements and Payables

100 - 299 Payments/Purchases

300 - 399 Commitments/Undelivered Orders/Expended Authority - Unpaid

400 - 599 Payables/Accrued Liabilities

600 - 699 Advances and Prepayments

C. Collections and Receivables

100 - 399 Receipts

400 - 599 Receivables/Accrued Revenue

600 - 799 Asset Sale and Disposition (Gains and Losses)

D. Adjustments/Writeoffs/Reclassification

100 - 299 Upward and Downward Adjustments

300 - 399 Prior-Period Adjustments

400 - 499 Writeoffs

500 - 799 Reclassification/Revaluation

E. Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections

100 - 399 Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499 Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above

500 - 799 Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

F. Yearend

100 - 299 Preclosing Entries

300 - 499 Closing Entries

G. Memorandum Entries

100 - 299 All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

H. Other Specialized Transaction Entries

100 - 799 Other
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER




I, Uwe
Eberle, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P.
(“registrant”);




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(c)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(d)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of  internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant 's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant 's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant 's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant 's internal control over financial
reporting.




By:  /s/
Uwe Eberle




__________________________________


Uwe
Eberle


President
and Chief Executive Officer


August
14, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GARY SPANN : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner, :

:

v. :

:

FRANK D. GILLIS, et al., : NO. 05-CV-0034

Respondents. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of May 2007, upon a careful review of Petitioner’s pro se 28

U.S.C. § 2254 Petition (Doc. No. 1), his pro se Amended § 2254 Petition and Supplemental

Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 9, 10), Respondents’ Response (Doc. No. 11), Magistrate Judge

Thomas Rueter’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12), Petitioner’s Motion for Extension

of Time (Doc. No. 13), Petitioner’s Motion for Correction of Record (Doc. No. 15), and

Petitioner’s Objections to Judge Rueter’s R&R (Doc. No. 21), it is hereby ORDERED as

follows:

1. Petitioner’s Motion for Correction of Record (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED. This

Court’s August 23, 2005 Order is VACATED. 

2. Petitioner’s Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 13) is DENIED as moot.

3. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 12) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

4. The Petition for habeas corpus is DENIED.

5. A certificate of appealability is not granted.

BY THE COURT:

/S/LEGROME D. DAVIS

Legrome D. Davis, J.

Case 2:05-cv-00034-LDD Document 29 Filed 05/11/07 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of
operations of the Company's Form 10-K, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              55
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      503
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17
<INVENTORY>                                        470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1173
<PP&E>                                            1412
<DEPRECIATION>                                     517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1182
<BONDS>                                            945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                         820
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3786    
<SALES>                                           2367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2367
<CGS>                                             1369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2618
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (338)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (356)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      72 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           (8)
<NET-INCOME>                                      (292)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.01)
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-30505

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARNOLD MALCOLM PILLETTE,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CR-20067-02

- - - - - - - - - -

December 10, 1996

Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arnold Malcolm Pillette appeals his sentence for conspiracy

to possess cocaine base with intent to distribute and interstate

travel in aid of illegal activity. His argument that U.S.S.G.

§ 2D1.1(c), which provides that the penalty for cocaine base is

100 times higher than the penalty for cocaine powder, violates

the Equal Protection Clause is foreclosed. This court has

determined that the penalty scheme in § 2D1.1 is rationally
No. 96-30505

- 2 -

related to the legitimate government interest in protecting the

general welfare. See United States v. Wilson, 77 F.3d 105, 112

(5th Cir. 1996). Pillette’s new claim on appeal that the

Government did not prove by a preponderance of the evidence that

the cocaine base charged in the indictment was crack cocaine

within the meaning of § 2D1.1 is frivolous. 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


    Certification of Chief Financial Officer

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp.(the
"Company") hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

         (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended; and

         (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated: May 13, 2002
/s/ THOMAS J. STIRNWEIS
------------------------------------
Thomas J. Stirnweis
Corporate Controller and Treasurer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section
18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
----

Action brought on 4 August 2006 — Euro-Information v OHIM (word mark ‘CYBERCREDIT’)

(Case T-211/06)

(2006/C 249/29)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Applicant: Européenne de traitement de l'information SAS (Euro-Information) (Strasbourg, France) (represented by: A. Jacquet, J. Schouman and P. Greffe, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘CYBERCREDIT’ in respect of goods and services in Classes 9, 36 and 38 (application No 4 114 336)

Decision of the examiner: Refusal to register

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

Pleas in law: The applicant claims that, contrary to the finding of the Board of Appeal of OHIM in the contested decision, its mark is arbitrary and is sufficiently distinctive in relation to the goods and services applied for to meet the requirements of Council Regulation No 40/94.

----
Exhibit
        10.15

      Commitment
        to Product Quality and Customer Service

       

      I.
        Commitment to product quality

      We
        will
        try our best to keep the death rate of our chicks within 7 days after sale
        lower
        than 2%. If the quality of our chicks causes death rates above 2%, we shall
        compensate at original price for the losses of those exceeding 2%, and promise
        to:

       

      
        	 	1,	
                accept
                  return of all products

              


      

      
        	 	2,	
                compensate
                  for all the losses

              


      

      
        	 	3,	
                compensate
                  for subsequent losses or losses you additionally required us to
                  indemnify.

              


      

      


      II.
        Commitment to Customer Service

       

      1,
        We
        sincerely wish to establish a business relationship with you, and provide
        you
        with top-quality service (Sopes and Standards of our Service see Commitment
        of
        Weifang Yuhe Poultry Co., Ltd).

       

      2,
        We
        will try our best to satisfy your need. If you have issues or complaints
        with
        our service, please contact us through the 24-hour hotline and special line
        of
        Chairmen.

       

      Hotline:
        0536-7363688

       

      Special
        line: 136 0536 1998

       

      
        
          
          

        

        
          
          

          
            

          

        

        
          
          

        

      

       

      3,
        We
        apologize for any inconvenience we may cause you, and we promise to compensate
        all your losses. In addition, you can receive an “Award for Complaint” of 300
        RMB each time you contact us.

      


      We
        would
        be grateful for you to inform us of any deficiencies or defects of our products
        and services. Thanks!

      

        
          	
                  Weifang
                    Yuhe Poultry Co., Ltd

                	 
                  
	 
                  	 
                  
	
                  February
                    12th,
                    2004
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 398 

To prevent the use of additional Internal Revenue Service funds from being 

used for audits of taxpayers with taxable incomes below $400,000 in 

order to protect low- and middle-income earning American taxpayers 

from an onslaught of audits from an army of new Internal Revenue 

Service auditors funded by an unprecedented, nearly $80,000,000,000, 

infusion of new funds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2023 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. GRASSLEY, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. THUNE, Mr. 

SCOTT of South Carolina, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. YOUNG, Mr. 

BARRASSO, Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To prevent the use of additional Internal Revenue Service 

funds from being used for audits of taxpayers with taxable incomes below $400,000 in order to protect lowand middle-income earning American taxpayers from an 

onslaught of audits from an army of new Internal Revenue Service auditors funded by an unprecedented, nearly $80,000,000,000, infusion of new funds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 398 IS

1 SECTION 1. LIMITATIONS RELATED TO THE INTERNAL REV2 ENUE SERVICE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 10301 of Public Law 

4 117–169 is amended— 

5 (1) by striking ‘‘IN GENERAL.—’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—’’, and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(b) LIMITATIONS RELATED TO THE INTERNAL REV9 ENUE SERVICE.—None of the funds appropriated under 

10 subsection (a)(1) may be used to audit taxpayers with tax11 able incomes below $400,000.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 1 DECREE OF DIVORCE
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"June 2023
----

MEDIA PLUS — Development, distribution and promotion (2001-2006)

Call for proposals — EACEA 08/06

Support for the networking of cinemas screening European films

(2006/C 239/10)

1.   Objectives and Description

This notice of call for proposals is based on Council Decision 2000/821/EC concerning the implementation of a programme encouraging the development, distribution and promotion of European audiovisual works (MEDIA PLUS — Development, distribution and promotion — 2001-2005), adopted by the Council on 20 December 2000 and published in Official Journal of the European Communities L 13 of 17 January 2001, as modified by decision 846/2004/CE of the European Parliament and Council of 29 April 2004 (JO L 157, 30.4.2004), rectified by JO L 195, 2.6.2004, p. 0002 — 0002.

The measures to be implemented under the Decision include support for the creation and consolidation of networks of European cinema operators running joint schemes to encourage the scheduling of European films, and support for cinemas screening a significant proportion of non-domestic European films for a minimum screening period.

2.   Eligible applicants

This call for proposals is aimed at European companies whose activities contribute to the attainment of the objectives of the MEDIA programme as described in the Council Decision.

The present notification is addressed to European organisations; those registered in and controlled by nationals from the Member States of the European Union and countries of the European Economic Agreement participating in the MEDIA Plus Programme (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway), Switzerland, as well as those other countries that satisfy the conditions laid down in Article 11 of Decision No 2000/821/EC (at the date of publication: Bulgaria).

3.   Budget and project duration

The total budget earmarked for the co-financing of projects is estimated at 14 000 000 Euros. Financial assistance from the Executive Agency (EACEA) cannot exceed 50 % of the total eligible costs.

Projects must start between 1/01/07 and 31/12/2007. The maximum duration of projects is 24 months.

4.   Deadline

Applications must be sent to the Executive Agency (EACEA) no later than 23/10/2006.

5.   Further information

The full text of the call for proposals and the application forms are available on the following website:

http://ec.europa.eu/comm/avpolicy/media/distr_en.html#1d

Applications must comply with the requirements set out in the full text and be submitted using the form provided.

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF AMERICAN BANKNOTE CORPORATION

                  This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2003, and
accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the year ended
December 31, 2003 of American Banknote Corporation (the "Company").

                  I, Patrick J. Gentile, the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certify that, to the best of my knowledge:

         (i)      the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

         (ii)     the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: March 30, 2004.

                                                     /s/ Patrick J. Gentile
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Name: Patrick J. Gentile
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2006/C 239/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----
# Bulletin No. 2021-20

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"August 2021

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"August 2021
No. 52961.

#### Saccone, Speed & Jenney, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 103529-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 3, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-129

Lower Tribunal No. F83-9397

________________

Randolph Baggett,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.

Randolph Baggett, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Linda Katz, Assistant Attorney 

General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, SCALES and LINDSEY, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Baggett v. Inch, 349 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021); 

Baggett v. State, 271 So. 3d 1241 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Baggett v. State, 

150 So. 3d 1151 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290-

91 (Fla. 2003) (holding that although res judicata does not prevent a 

defendant from filing successive 3.800 motions raising new issues, collateral 

estoppel prevents a defendant from relitigating issues previously presented 

and decided). See also Franklin v. State, 258 So. 3d 1239, 1241 (Fla. 2018) 

(acknowledging that in State v. Michel, 257 So. 3d 3 (Fla. 2018), the Florida 

Supreme Court abrogated Atwell v. State, 197 So. 3d 1040 (Fla. 2016): “As 

we held in Michel, involving a juvenile homicide offender sentenced to life 

with the possibility of parole after 25 years, Florida's statutory parole process 

fulfills Graham's requirement that juveniles be given a “meaningful 

opportunity” to be considered for release during their natural life based upon 

“normal parole factors,” [Virginia v.] LeBlanc, 137 S.Ct. [1726,] 1729 (2017), 

as it includes initial and subsequent parole reviews based upon 

individualized considerations before the Florida Parole Commission that are 

subject to judicial review. . . .”)