alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Sound Revolution Inc. Form 10-Q





LOAN AGREEMENT



This Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated May 30, 2008, is made by and between Sound Revolution Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Sound Revolution”), Penny Green, Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company (“Green”), and Bacchus Entertainment Ltd. (“Bacchus”), a company owned by Green.

Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the parties hereby agree as follows:

	1.      	As of May 30, 2008: 
	 
	 	a.      	Sound Revolution has received loans from Green; 
	 
	 	b.      	Sound Revolution has received loans from Bacchus, pursuant to a loan agreement entered into on August 31, 2004 as amended on November 30, 2004, June 14, 2006, January 1, 2007, June 30, 2007 and January 1, 2008. 
	 
	2.      	Bacchus hereby assigns to Green all monies now due and accruing due to it from Sound Revolution as of the date of this agreement, with power to sue for or otherwise collect the monies absolutely (the “Loan”). 
	 
	3.      	Green is to be indemnified by Bacchus from all costs and charges of any kind incurred in the collection of these monies, or otherwise in connection with them. 
	 
	4.      	No interest shall be charged on any outstanding balance of the Loan from March 1, 2008 onwards. 
	 
	5.      	The full amount of the Loan is payable on demand to Green. 
	 
	6.      	Sound Revolution shall have the option to pay out the outstanding balance of the Loan and interest in full to Green at any time without a penalty. 
	 


This Agreement replaces the agreement between Sound Revolution, Bacchus and Green dated August 31, 2004 as amended on November 30, 2004, June 14, 2006, January 1, 2007, June 30, 2007, and January 1, 2008.

In witness whereof this Agreement has been executed by or on behalf of the parties hereto, as an instrument under seal as of the date first above written.


	Sound Revolution Inc.  	 	 Bacchus Entertainment Ltd. 
	  
	By: /s/ Robin Ram  		 By: /s/ Penny Green 
	
      Robin Ram

     Title: Chief Executive Officer  

		
      Penny Green

      Title:  President 


	  
	  	
                /s/ Penny Green 

                Penny Green
No. 66783.

#### Winter-Wolff & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 329929-K and 329930-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel hinges and screws similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Trans Atlantic Company*v. *United States*(35 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 1712) and that the value of the screws is $1.42 per thousand pieces, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott H. Rechler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FrontLine Capital
Group;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 19, 2003                         /S/  SCOTT H. RECHLER

                                            ---------------------------
                                                  Scott H. Rechler
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive Officer)


                                       50
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Bonnie M. Klein, Vice President and Treasurer of BCSB Bancorp, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 9, 2005
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3946 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3946

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, as the ``Sergeant Major Billy D. 
                          Waugh Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SERGEANT MAJOR BILLY D. WAUGH POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Sergeant Major Billy D. Waugh Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sergeant 
Major Billy D. Waugh Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

Environmental Protection Division 

A. Stanley Meiberg flPA-UGION H 

Acting Regional Administrator Atull'i.'A. G4 

U.S. EPA, Region 4 

61 Forsyth Street, S.W. 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303-31 04 

RE: Withdrawal of Section 11 O(a)(2)(D)(i)(l) Portion of the Georgia's Certification 

of 110(a) Infrastructure Elements for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQs 

Dear Mr. Meiburg: 

On 

U.S. 

March 6, 2012, the Georgia Environmental Division (EPD) submitted a letter to the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) certifying that Georgia's current State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) contains the Section 11 O(a) elements of the Clean Air Act 

Standards 

(CAA) that meet the requirements of the 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

(NAAQS) as revised in 2008. 

The 11 O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) is the interstate transport component, also known as the "good 

neighbor obligation" and requires the determination of significant contribution 

nonattainment 

to 

or maintenance of downwind States. On August 21, 2012, the decision 

Cross-State 

by The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to vacate the 2011 

Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) (EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. EPA, No. 

11-1302) clarified that only EPA can determine "significant contribution" and that "a SIP 

cannot be deemed to lack a required submission or be deemed deficient for failing to 

implement the good neighbor obligation until after EPA has defined the State's good 

Gina 

neighbor 

McCarthy, 

obligation," which is reiterated in the November 19, 2012 EPA memo from 

Assistant Administrator. 

At this time, EPA has yet to determine Georgia's significant contribution of pollutants, in 

regards to the 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS, to any downwind State. Therefore, no 

revision to Georgia's SIP is necessary at this time to incorporate this element of Section 

11 O(a) of the CAA. Once EPA determines Georgia's significant contribution 

nonattainment 

to 

Georgia 

or maintenance areas in downwind States, then EPA may require 

Section 

to submit a SIP revision under Section 11 O(k)(5) or submit a new SIP under 

110(a)(1) of the CAA. 

Therefore, the certification that GA EPD submitted relating to 11 O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) is no 

longer applicable. As such, the State of Georgia hereby withdraws the 11 O(a)(2)(D)i)(l) 

portion of the March 6, 2012 submission of the Certification of Infrastructure Elements 

for the 2008 8-hour Ozone NAAQS as they pertain to Georgia. 
A. Stanley Meiburg 

Page 2 of 2 

OCT!OI 2013 

If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Keith Bentley at 

(404) 363-7016 or Jimmy Johnston at (404) 363-7014. 

Sincerely, 

. IIC-_ 

JHT:JPJ:JLK 

c: Scott Davis, U.S. EPA Region 4 

Keith Bentley, EPD, Air Protection Branch 

Jimmy Johnston, EPD, Air Protection Branch
No. 60804.

#### Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc., and Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 253661-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

When this case was called for trial, the collector’s memorandum in connection with the protest and the papers with the entry were received in evidence, and counsel for the Government conceded that the facts stated in the collector’s memorandum were true. Said memorandum stated that “The Surveyor’s report of weight as shown on Customs Form 5985 (a) dated March 29, 1951 and attached to the entry papers was accepted in the liquidation *518of Warehouse Entry 20185 covering 200 cases of cheese,” and that “Following amended report of that officer on Customs Form 4371, attached to the entry, to the effect that the tares reported were insufficient and not actually representative, the weight which would now be taken in liquidation, in accordance with Surveyor’s recommendation, would be the reported gross weight less the invoiced tare.” Accordingly, it was held that the involved merchandise is subject to duty at the appropriate rate under paragraph 710, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, on the basis of the gross weight reported by the surveyor on customs Form 5985 (a), dated March 29, 1951, less the invoiced tare.
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 32(ii)

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Ionics, Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                                /s/Daniel M. Kuzmak
                                                --------------------------
                                                Daniel M. Kuzmak
                                                Vice President and Chief
                                                Financial Officer

Date: March 15, 2004
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CRAFT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CIV S-04-0780 MCE KJM PS

MICHAEL WYNNE,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

A status conference was held in this matter on September 20, 2006 before the

undersigned. No appearance was made for plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se in this action in

propria persona. Bobbie Montoya appeared for defendant. Upon consideration of the status

report on file in this action, discussion of counsel and good cause appearing therefor, THE

COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:

1. Under Federal Rule of Procedure 25(d)(1), Michael Wynne is substituted in as

defendant.

2. Modifications to the discovery limitations are allowed as set forth in the joint

status report.

3. Initial disclosures under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(1) shall be

made within twenty-one days from the date of this order.

Case 2:04-cv-00780-MCE -KJM Document 29 Filed 09/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

4. Plaintiff shall disclose experts no later than November 17, 2006.

5. Defendant shall disclose experts no later than December 15, 2006.

6. Discovery, including the hearing of discovery motions, shall be completed by

February 14, 2007. Discovery motions, if needed, shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule

37-251.

7. Dispositive motions, other than discovery motions, shall be noticed to be

heard by May 9, 2007.

8. The pretrial conference is set for August 6, 2007 at 3:30 p.m. before the

Honorable Morrison C. England. Pretrial statements shall be filed in accordance with Local Rule

16-281.

9. Trial of this matter is set for October 31, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. before the

Honorable Morrison C. England. The parties shall file trial briefs in accordance with Local Rule

16-285.

DATED: September 26, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

craft.oas

Case 2:04-cv-00780-MCE -KJM Document 29 Filed 09/27/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,574
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,767
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,897
<INVENTORY>                                      1,730
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               226,692
<PP&E>                                         913,361
<DEPRECIATION>                                 216,947
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,124,728
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          173,454
<BONDS>                                        566,292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     303,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,124,728
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               241,541
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  250,057
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,075
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,860
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,028
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,516)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,708)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,793)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (6)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (6)
        

</TABLE>
EPA/Polysius Meeting on NESHAP and NSPS 

Meeting Date: October 28, 2009 

Location: Polysius Corporation 

180 Interstate North Parkway 

Atlanta, GA 30339 

 Research Triangle Park, NC 

Participants: 

NAME AFFILIATION PHONE NUMBER 

Keith Barnett US EPA 919-541-5605 

Elineth Torres US EPA 919-541-4347 

David Read Florida Department of 

Environmental Protection 

850-414-7268 

Al Linero Florida Department of 

Environmental Protection 

850-921-9523 

Mark S. Terry Polysius 770-980-5013 

Detlev Vupper Polysius +49 25 25 99 2333 

Dietmar Schulz Polysius +49 25 25 99 2229 

Sebastian Frie Polysius +49 25 25 99 2665 

Wendy Greene SCDHEC 843-953-0150 

Whit Hoover SCDHEC 843-953-0150 

Mike Laney RTI International 919-316-3413 

Mark Mueller Polysius 770-980-5029 

Michael Herziger Polysius 770-980-5076 

Veronica Barringer South Carolina Department 

of Health and 

Environmental Control 

803-898-4127 

Melissa Poage South Carolina Department 

of Health and 

Environmental Control 

803-898-3235 

Neil Ballantyne Polysius 770-980-5926 

Uwe Eschenhorst Polysius 770-980-5092 

Alexandra Baskette Polysius 770-980-5004 

Taruna Vanjani Georgia Environmental 

Protection Department 

404-362-2523 

Heather Abrams US EPA Region 4 404-562-9185 

Sara Waterson US EPA Region 4 404-562-9061 

Elizabeth Munsey Georgia Environmental 

Protection Department 

404-363-7103 
Participants met to discuss issues and status of the NESHAP and NSPS for Portland 

cement manufacturing. During the Meeting the Polysius personnel presented general 

information on their company and some of their experience with various types of 

mercury and NOx emissions controls. 

Some of the key issues raised by the Polysius personnel related to the site specific effects 

of raw materials and fuels on NOx emissions and controls. They also raised questions on 

the achievability of the proposed mercury and total hydrocarbon emission limits, and 

question on disposal of wastes from mercury controls. Al Linero of the Florida 

Department of Environmental Protection gave a presentation on the possibilities of using 

dust shuttling for reducing mercury emissions.
EXHIBIT 4.6

                    PLEDGED SHARE AMENDMENT


     This Pledged Share Amendment, dated as of July 19, 1993, is
delivered pursuant to Section 5 of the Pledge Agreement referred to
below.  The undersigned hereby agrees that this Pledged Share Amendment
may be attached to the Pledge Agreement dated as of May 26, 1992, between
the undersigned and Chemical Bank, as Trustee (the "Pledge Agreement";
capitalized terms defined therein being used herein as therein defined),
and that the Pledged Shares listed on this Pledged Share Amendment shall
be deemed to be part of the Pledged Shares and shall become part of the
Pledged Collateral and shall secure all Senior Obligations as provided in
the Pledge Agreement.



                    UNITED STATES BANKNOTE CORPORATION


                    By:  s/Harvey Kesner
                    Name:  Harvey J.  Kesner
                    Title: Vice President


                                                            Percentage of
                           Stock                            All Capital
                 Class of  Certificate  Par     Number of   Stock
Stock Issuer     Stock     Number       value   Shares      Outstanding





United States Banknote
Corporation,
International    Common   1             $0.01    100         100%