alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EL COMITE PARA EL BIENESTAR DE

EARLIMART, an unincorporated

association; ASSOCIATION OF

IRRITATE RESIDENTS, an NO. CIV. S-04-882 LKK/KJM

unincorporated association;

COMMUNITY AND CHILDREN’S

ADVOCATES AGAINST PESTICIDE 

POISONING, a California non-profit

corporation; WISHTOYO FOUNDATION,

a California non-profit corporation;

and VENTURA COASTKEEPER, a California

non-profit corporation,

Plaintiffs,

v.

PAUL HELLIKER, in his official O R D E R

capacity as Director, Department

of Pesticide Regulation; TERRY

TAMMINEN, in his official capacity

as Secretary, California Environmental

Protection Agency; CATHERINE 

WITHERSPOON, in her official capacity

as Executive Officer, Air Resources

Board; ALAN LLOYD, in his official

capacity as Chairman, Air Resources

Board; and WILLIAM BURKE, JOSEPH CALHOUN,

DORENE D’ADAMO, MARK DESAULNIER, C. HUGH

FRIEDMAN, WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAN, MATTHEW

McKINNON, BARBARA PATRICK, BARBARA RIORDAN

and RON ROBERTS, in their official 

capacities as members, Air Resources Board,

Defendants.

 /

Case 2:04-cv-00882-LKK -KJM Document 112 Filed 03/10/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The parties in the above-captioned case appeared before the

court via telephone conference on March 8, 2006. As a result of

the discussions during that conference, the court hereby GRANTS the

parties ten (10) additional days to brief the matter of remedies.

The parties are ORDERED to file their remedies briefs no later than

4:30 p.m. on March 27, 2006. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: March 8, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00882-LKK -KJM Document 112 Filed 03/10/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Darrel L. Smith,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-0702 MCE PAN P

vs. Order

King, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a prisoner, without counsel, who claims his

civil rights were violated by defendant King’s deliberate

indifference to plaintiff’s safety by releasing confidential

information about plaintiff’s enemies. Plaintiff requests the

court enter defendant King’s default and award punitive damages

upon the ground that defendant King has failed to comply with an

order to answer any discovery request within 14 days.

A party may move for an order compelling discovery with 

respect to objections or other failure to respond to 

Case 2:04-cv-00702-MCE -EFB Document 66 Filed 08/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

interrogatories or requests to produce documents. Fed. R. Civ.

P. 37(a)(2)(B), 33(b)(5), 34(b). When a party disobeys an order

to provide or to permit discovery, the court may make such orders

as are just, including “rendering a judgment by default against

the disobedient party.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b). The court may

render judgement of default against a party who fails to serve

“answers or objections to interrogatories under Rule 33" or “a

written request for inspection submitted under Rule 34,” provided

the interrogatories or request properly was served. Fed. R. Civ.

P. 37(d)(2), (3). 

The court has made no order compelling discovery. Insofar

as plaintiff believes paragraph three of the December 10, 2004,

order governing discovery creates a right to responses within 14

days, it does not. The order requires defendant to give 14 days’

notice to plaintiff or any other prisoner before examining him at

deposition. Plaintiff does not allege he properly served

interrogatories or a request for inspection and in any event,

absent an order or a written agreement between the parties, a

party has 30 days to respond to requests made pursuant to Rules

33 and 34. Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(b)(2), 34(b).

Accordingly, plaintiff’s January 18, 2005, motion is denied. 

So ordered.

Dated: August 17, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

/smith0702.dny mtn.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-00702-MCE -EFB Document 66 Filed 08/17/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit
      10.8

    NEW
      ASIA PARTNERS CHINA CORPORATION

     

    ____________,
      2008

    


    New
      Asia
      Partners Limited

    1401-02
      China Insurance Building

    166
      Lu
      Jia Zui Dong Lu

    Pudong,
      Shanghai, 200120, China

     

    Gentlemen:

    


    This
      letter will confirm our agreement that, commencing on the effective date
      (“Effective Date”) of the registration statement for the initial public offering
      (“IPO”) of the securities of New Asia Partners China Corporation (“Company”) and
      continuing until the consummation by the Company of a “Business Combination” (as
      described in the Company’s IPO prospectus) or its liquidation, New Asia Partners
      Limited shall make available to the Company certain general and administrative
      services including office space, utilities and secretarial support, as may
      be
      required by the Company from time to time, situated at 1401-02 China Insurance
      Building, 166 Lu Jia Zui Dong Lu, Pudong, Shanghai, 200120, China (or any
      successor location). In exchange therefor, the Company shall pay New Asia
      Partners Limited the sum of $7,500 per month on the Effective Date and
      continuing monthly thereafter.

     

    
      
        	
                Very
                  truly yours,

              
	
                 

              
	
                NEW
                  ASIA PARTNERS CHINA 
CORPORATION

              
	
                 

              	 
	
                By:

              	
                 

              
	
                 

              	
                Name:

              
	
                 

              	
                Title:

              


      

      


      
        	
                AGREED
                  TO AND ACCEPTED BY:

              
	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                NEW
                  ASIA PARTNERS LIMITED

              
	
                 

              	
                 

              
	
                By:

              	
                 

              
	
                Name:

              	
                 

              
	
                Title:
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Chief Financial Officer

 

March 1, 2007
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 1 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 2 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 3 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 4 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 5 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 6 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 7 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 8 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 9 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 10 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 11 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 12 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 13 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 14 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 15 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 16 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 17 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 18 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 19 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 20 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 21 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 22 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 23 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 24 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 25 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 26 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 27 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 28 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 29 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20132-HB Document 4 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 30 of 30
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0776 LKK EFB P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. 

See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants request an extension of time to file and serve a response to

the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b).

Defendants’ March 22, 2007, request is granted and defendants have 20 days from the

date this order is served to file and serve a response to the complaint.

So ordered. 

Dated: March 29, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 82 Filed 03/29/07 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of American BankNote Holographics, Inc. (the “Company”), that the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and the results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 

 
|   | By: /s/ Kenneth H. Traub              |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Kenneth H. Traub                      |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Date:  November 14, 2005

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906,or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to AmericanBank Note Holographics, Inc. and will be retained by American Bank NoteHolographics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the balance
sheet and income statement, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial schedules.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             809
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      364
<ALLOWANCES>                                         8
<INVENTORY>                                        316
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,617
<PP&E>                                           1,330
<DEPRECIATION>                                     502
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,988
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              654
<BONDS>                                            545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,153
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,988
<SALES>                                          1,861
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,861
<CGS>                                            1,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  48
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    288
<INCOME-TAX>                                       102
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                186
<DISCONTINUED>                                       4
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       190
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.52
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

MONICA N. ANDERSON

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

DANIEL P. O’DONNELL, State Bar No. 177872

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 324-5810

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants Hirschler, Finn, Moore,

Cook

SA2004101589

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

 SACRAMENTO DIVISION

ORZELL LONG,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. CIV S-04-0881 DFL PAN

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND

DISCOVERY RELATED TO EXPERT

WITNESSES AND THE DISCOVERY

CUT-OFF DATES AND ORDER

THEREIN 

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-00881-DFL-EFB Document 37 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION

2

The parties hereby stipulate to extend the discovery cut off dates, as it is related to

expert witnesses, to August 19, 2005, with supplemental expert disclosures due September 2,

2005. This extension is necessary for Defendants to secure an appropriate expert to examine

Plaintiff’s medical condition. 

DATED: 08/05/2005

/s/

DANIEL P. O’DONNELL

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Defendants

DATED: 08/05/2005

/s/

BEREHANU H. CHALLA

Attorney for Plaintiff

IT IS SO ORDERED:

DATED: August 15, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-00881-DFL-EFB Document 37 Filed 08/16/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOINT STIPULATION

3

04cv881.o.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-00881-DFL-EFB Document 37 Filed 08/16/05 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 142 Filed 05/23/08 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 142 Filed 05/23/08 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 142 Filed 05/23/08 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 142 Filed 05/23/08 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 142 Filed 05/23/08 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-05350-SD Document 142 Filed 05/23/08 Page 6 of 6
No. 58964.

protests 26011-K, etc. (New York).

#### Sam Bernstein China Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480) and that the items marked “B” consist of lambskin plates similar to those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decisions, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra.*
No. 46100.

#### Petition 6130-R of Collin & Gissel (Galveston).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that there was no intention to conceal or misrepresent the facts or to defraud the revenue. The petition was therefore granted.
# C_2018104EN.01003601.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Zaharieva (Ice cream cornet packaging)

(Case T-794/16) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an ice cream cornet - Earlier international registration designating Bulgaria - Ground for invalidity - Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use - Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 - Duty of diligence - Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002))

(2018/C 104/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Şehitkamil Gaziantep, Turkey) (represented by: T. Tsenova, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court: Elka Zaharieva (Plovdiv, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Kostov, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 September 2016 (Case R 1144/2015-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret and Mrs Zaharieva.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 September 2016 (Case R 1144/2015-3); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 September 2016 (Case R 1144/2015-3);

| 2. | Grants the application for a declaration that the design registered under number 002343244-0001 is invalid; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Grants the application for a declaration that the design registered under number 002343244-0001 is invalid;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

| 4. | Orders Mrs Elka Zaharieva to bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Mrs Elka Zaharieva to bear her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3180]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Office of International Regimes and Agreements; Proposed 
Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is being issued under the authority of section 131 
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The 
Department is providing notice of a proposed ``subsequent arrangement'' 
under the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear 
Energy between the United States and the European Atomic Energy 
Community (Euratom) and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful 
Uses of Nuclear Energy between the United States and Canada.
    This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 846,126 kg 
of Natural UO<INF>3</INF> (82.7% U), containing 700,000 kg of Uranium. 
This material will be retransferred from Cameco Corporation, Canada, to 
Springfields Fuels Ltd., United Kingdom for ultimate use as nuclear 
power reactor fuel by Electric Power Development Company Ltd., Japan. 
Springfields Fuels Ltd. is authorized to receive nuclear material 
pursuant to the U.S.-Euratom Agreement for Cooperation.
    In accordance with section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as 
amended, we have determined that this subsequent arrangement will not 
be inimical to the common defense and security.
    This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen 
days after the date of publication of this notice.

    Dated: February 20, 2007.

    For the Department of Energy.
Anatoli Welihozkiy,
Acting Director, Office of International Regimes and Agreements.
 [FR Doc. E7-3180 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statement of IBP, inc. on Form S-3
(File No. 33-64459) and on Form S-8 (File No. 33-
19441) of our report dated February 7, 2000, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and
financial statement schedule of IBP, inc. as of
December 25, 1999 and December 26, 1998 and for each
of the three years ended December 25, 1999, which
report is incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
March 23, 2000
# sec5_sbr_2019

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout December 4, 2018