alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHILES OFFSHORE LLC CONTAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,760
<PP&E>                                         137,712
<DEPRECIATION>                                      80
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 178,998
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,108
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,889
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   178,998
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  46
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    295
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       295
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 62543.

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 179904-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 4.1


                                                               CUSIP
                        SMSA EL PASO II ACQUISITION CORP.


               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

                                                               SEE REVERSE FOR
                                  COMMON STOCK               CERTAIN DEFINITIONS



                                    SPECIMEN


This
certifies
that







is the owner of


 FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF
                        SMSA EL PASO II ACQUISITION CORP.


(hereinafter  called  the  "Corporation"),  transferable  on  the  books  of the
Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney,  upon
surrender of the Certificate properly endorsed.  This certificate and the shares
represented hereby are issued and shall be held subject to all the provisions of
the  Articles of  Incorporation  and the Bylaws of the  Corporation,  as amended
(copies of which are on file at the  office of the  Transfer  Agent),  to all of
which  the  holder  of this  Certificate  by  acceptance  hereof  assents.  This
Certificate  is not valid unless  countersigned  and  registered by the Transfer
Agent and  Registrar.  Witness  the  facsmile  seal of the  Corporation  and the
facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers.


DATE:


                            [CORPORATE SEAL OMITTED]



                               Countersigned:
PRESIDENT                                    SECURITIES TRANSFER CORPORATION
                                             P.O. Box 701629
                                             Dallas, TX 75370
                                          By:


SECRETARY                                    ___________________________________
                                             TRANSFER AGENT-AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
Before the Third Division,

February 17, 1945

No. 50030.

#### Protest 914977-G of A. L. Tuska Son & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated and agreed that the bone lemon picks-in question are similar in- all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 39426. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1537" was sustained.
No. 62486.

#### J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 323810-K (New (York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 23 

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Post Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-24187) pertaining to the Ingles Markets,Incorporated 1983 Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectus, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52103) pertaining to the Ingles Markets, Incorporated Investment/Profit Sharing Plan and in the related Prospectus, in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-13067) pertaining to Ingles Markets, Incorporated 1987 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectus, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-63167) pertaining to the Ingles Markets,Incorporated 1991 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectus, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-63165) pertaining to the Option Agreement dated July 21, 1993 entered into by Ingles Markets, Incorporated with Robert P.Ingle and in the related Prospectus, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-63163) pertaining to the Option Agreement dated July 21, 1993 entered into by Ingles Markets, Incorporated with Landy B. Laney and in the related Prospectus, in theRegistration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-88310) pertaining to the Ingles Markets, Incorporated Amended and Restated 1997 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectus, and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74459)pertaining to the Ingles Markets, Incorporated Investment/Profit Sharing Plan and in the related Prospectus, of our report dated November 28, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ingles Markets, Incorporated andsubsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 27, 2003. 

 

 

Greenville, South Carolina 

December 22, 2003
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 99-20392

KIMBERLY DAGLE BIGGS,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; ET AL.,

Defendants,

THE CITY OF BAYTOWN; MARVIN CURRIE, Officer,

Defendants-Appellees,

CHARLES SHAFFER, Chief of Police,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-1203)

June 28, 2000

Before REAVLEY, DAVIS and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After reviewing the record and based on the briefs and

arguments of counsel, we are satisfied that the district court
2

correctly concluded that material issues of fact were presented on

Chief Shaffer’s qualified immunity defense to Biggs’ sex

discrimination claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Accordingly, the

appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 
 We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on (i)
Form S-3 (No. 333-149090, (ii) Form S-3 (No. 333-145832), (iii) Form S-3 (No.
333-136794), (iv) Form S-8 (No. 333-150184), (v) Form S-8 (No. 333-149715), and
(vi) Form S-8 (No. 333-129203) of Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of our reports
dated March 8,2010 relating to our audits of the consolidated financial
statements and internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Javelin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2009.
 
 
 
 Burlington,
MA
 March 8,
2010
Date: August 4, 2000 

To: Wendy M. Comes, Executive Director 

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board 

From: Judy Yuran, Chairman 

Standard General Ledger – Issues Resolution Committee 

Subject: Issues Resolution Committee (IRC) Response to the Exposure Draft of Credit 

Program Reconciliation and Technical Amendments to Accounting 

Standards for Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees in Statements of Federal 

Financial Accounting Standards No. 2 and No. 18 

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Exposure Draft (ED) of Credit Program 

Reconciliation and Technical Amendments to Accounting Standards for Direct Loans and Loan 

Guarantees in Statements of Federal Financial Accounting Standards No. 2 and No. 18, dated 

May 10, 2000. The Issues Resolution Committee did not see a direct impact on the Standard 

General Ledger and therefore does not have any comments at this time. 

Thank you again for the opportunity to comment on this exposure draft. Please feel free to call 

me on (202) 874-6308 if you need additional information.
EXHIBIT
32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of Getty Realty Corp. (the “Company”) hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)  the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (subject to the Company's
position prevailing in regard to the remaining unresolved SEC comment, as more
fully described in the Report); and





(ii)  the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:
August 10, 2009





BY:/s/ Leo
Liebowitz


(Signature)


LEO
LIEBOWITZ


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Getty Realty Corp. and will be retained by Getty Realty Corp. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.
No. 61325.

protest 275166-K (New York).

#### Ivan Josephs, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Hello, \.(

### \ My name is Ben Topiel. The last name is spelled T-0-P-1-E-L I'm a student at George Washington University. I come here today in support ofthe Clean Power Plan. I grew up in Southern NewJersey. Spending long summer days atthe beach with family are some of my happiest memories. My sister, my cousins, and I spent hours making elaborate fortresses in the sand and boogey boarding in the ocean. In the mornings, my fathertook us to ourfavorite bakeryforwarm homemade donuts. But because of increasingly severe storms like hurricane sandy, so many kids will not getto enjoy the same wonderful, innocent memories. And, Because ofJhe_air_pollutioo--aRcl-extreme heat;- MY cherished childhood memories

**GOLo~-ifl--the-"Stlfl** are

**~n~** with darker, less happy

_ _ones. My mom, sister, and others in myfamily sufferfroMasthma which hasthreatened their lives on multiple occasions. I still remember a particularly vivid time, when I was 8 years old atthe shorewith myfamily, and my mom began to wheeze, and soon she could barely breathe. She was having a severe asthma attack, and before long was rushed to the hospital. Sadly, manyother New Jerseyans share this story. Statewide, over 500,000 adults and morethan 200,000 children sufferfrom asthma. Besides being a Jerseyean, I also belong to a generation that is keenly aware ofthe realities ofclimate change. At 10 years old, I bought a book on global warming at'my school bookfair. I remember sitting in my bedroom, reading aboutthe science ofthe Greenhouse Effect, and how humans are causing climates to change at rates ourearth had never seen before. This type ofstory is not uncommon among people myage. My generation is not only educated on climate change, but compelled to take the necessary action to address this greatchallenge. We aren't growing up in a world endowed with a seemingly infinite cheap energy supply, oronethat is unaware ofdamaging consequences burning fossil fuels hasfor ourselves and the people we care about. We recognize that using renewable energy isn'tjustabout protecting future generations from the perils ofclimate change. It is about preventing our health today from the other harmful pollutants spewing from fossil fuel fired power plants. And while the problems of climate change have moved firmly into the present, its solutions provide a powerful opportunityto re-energize our economy, protect our citizens, and lead the world in innovation and socialjustice. The Clean Power Plan will stimulate investments in efficiency and renewable energy sources such aswind and solar, creating thejob ofthe future and building an energy system that is safer and more resilient Fortunately we currently have the tools and knowledge need to tackle the challenge of climate change. Yet, corporate polluters and legislative inaction obstruct these solutions from being implemented. That is why I supportthe EPAfortaking action that is notonly a good first step in limiting carbon polluting, but that will also spark climate action and innovation around the world. I urge the EPAto finalize the rule so thatwe can all have a healthier, more prosperous present and future. Thankyou very much.
No. 52539.

protest 120729-K.

#### — Frances B. Wilcon *v.*United States,

— C. D. 1123. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS MARTEL,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0014 DFL PAN P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Several matters are pending before the court.

On December 27, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint

together with a proposed amended complaint. Defendants have not opposed the motion. Good

cause appearing, defendants will be directed to show cause in writing why plaintiff’s motion

should not be granted.

On January 19, 2006, defendants filed a request for an extension of time, to an

including February 2, 2006, to serve a response to a set of interrogatories served by plaintiff on

December 7, 2005. Good cause appearing, defendants’ request will be granted nunc pro tunc to

February 2, 2006.

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00014-ALA Document 40 Filed 03/01/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Finally, on February 15, 2006, defendants filed a document styled as an opposition

to a motion to compel that defendants represent was mailed to them by plaintiff on January 30,

2006. No motion to compel has been filed in this court on or after that date. Defendants’

opposition will be placed in the court record and disregarded.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within twenty days from the date of this order defendants shall show cause in

writing, if any they have, why plaintiff’s December 27, 2005 motion to amend his complaint

should not be granted;

2. Defendants’ January 19, 2006 request for extension of time to serve responses

to interrogatories is granted nunc pro tunc to February 2, 2006; and

3. Defendants’ February 15, 2006 opposition to plaintiff’s motion to compel shall

be placed in the court record and disregarded.

DATED: Feburary 27, 2006. 

12

mart0014.o

Case 2:04-cv-00014-ALA Document 40 Filed 03/01/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 

 v. : DATE FILED: 

DON RICARDO BLANCO : VIOLATIONS:

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) (convicted felon in

: possession of a firearm - 1 count)

18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. §

: 2461(c) (criminal forfeiture)

INDICTMENT

COUNT ONE

THE GRAND JURY CHARGES THAT:

On or about April 5, 2005, in Reading, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania,

defendant

DON RICARDO BLANCO,

having been convicted in a court of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania of a crime punishable by

imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, knowingly possessed in and affecting interstate

commerce a firearm, that is a Bryco Arms, .380 caliber semi-automatic handgun, Model Bryco

38, serial number 1222438, loaded with 7 live rounds of .380 caliber ammunition.

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1).

Case 2:05-cr-00473-MMB Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 2
2

NOTICE OF FORFEITURE

THE GRAND JURY FURTHER CHARGES THAT:

As a result of the violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(g)(1) set

forth in this indictment, defendant

DON RICARDO BLANCO

shall forfeit to the United States of America the firearm and ammunition involved in the

commission of this offense, including, but not limited to: 

(1) Bryco Arms, .380 caliber semi-automatic handgun, Model Bryco 38, serial

number 1222438; and

(2) 7 live rounds of .380 caliber ammunition.

All pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), and Title 18,

United States Code, Section 924(d). 

A TRUE BILL:

____________________________

GRAND JURY FOREPERSON

 

PATRICK L. MEEHAN

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

Case 2:05-cr-00473-MMB Document 1 Filed 08/23/05 Page 2 of 2
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 6/21/2023 1

Improperly Requiring Dormitory Names 

on Students’ Voter-Registration Forms 

Pitcher v. Dutchess County Board of Elections 

(Kenneth M. Karas, S.D.N.Y. 7:12-cv-8017) 

A federal complaint challenged the rejection of students’ voterregistration applications for failure to list dormitory names or room 

numbers despite the inclusion of valid street and mailing addresses. 

On the day before the election, the district judge ordered acceptance of registration applications for the student plaintiffs and 

others similarly situated. Several months later, the suit was closed 

by consent decree and a stipulated award of attorney fees. 

Subject: Registration procedures. Topics: Student registration; 

registration procedures; class action; attorney fees. 

Four students filed a federal class-action complaint on October 31, 2012, 

claiming wrongful rejection of their voter-registration applications for the 

November 6 general election because the students did not include on their 

applications dormitory names or room numbers in addition to the students’ 

street and mailing addresses.1

On the day that the complaint was filed, Judge Kenneth M. Karas issued 

an order that the defendants show cause on November 5 why relief should 

not be granted.2

On November 5, Judge Karas ordered the county election officials to register student applicants whose registrations were rejected for failure to provide a dormitory name or room number.3

The case was resolved by consent decree on May 13, 2013.4 County election officials agreed not to require dormitory names or room numbers for 

students registering to vote so long as communications with the voters were 

not returned as undeliverable and unless the state changed its election law to 

require dormitory names or room numbers for student voters.5

 The parties 

also agreed that the county’s board of elections would pay an award of attorney fees and costs totaling $37,237.50 to the plaintiffs and $20,797.50 to 

codefendants.6

1. Complaint, Pitcher v. Dutchess Cty. Bd. of Elections, No. 7:12-cv-8017 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 

31, 2012), D.E. 1. 

2. Order, id. (Oct. 31, 2012), D.E. 3. 

3. Preliminary Injunction, id. (Nov. 5, 2012), D.E. 6; Consent Decree at 2, id. (May 13, 

2013), D.E. 18; see College Students in Suit Get Right to Vote in Election Today, Westchester J. 

News, Nov. 6, 2012, at B1. 

4. Consent Decree, supra note 3. 

5. Id. at 3. 

6. Id. at 4.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 13, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00382

- CV

Anthony C. AGUILAR and Michael A. Aguilar

,

Appellant s

v.

Margaret Anne MORALES , individually and as In dependent Executor of the Estate of Alvilda

M. Aguilar; William E. Leighner, and Arthur Bayern,

Appellee s

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PC

- 2802 Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellees’ motion for a forty

- five day extension of time to file their brief is granted. We order the brief of appellees due Dece mber 2 0 , 2016.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 13th day of Octobe r, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 49144.

#### Protests 68745-K, etc., of Tuck Cheong & Co. (Baltimore).

*246Opinion by

Colb, J.

The' Ve-tsin in question was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 66805.

#### Bristol Antiques Importing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 173429-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material re*467spects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, the claim at 22% percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), for other metal articles, not specially provided for, was sustained. The items marked “0,” stipulated to be the same as those involved in said Abstract 62036, were held dutiable at 25 percent under the provision in said paragraph 397, as modified, *supra,*for articles, not specially provided for, plated with silver on nickel silver or copper, but not in chief value of silver, as claimed. The items marked “E,” stipulated to be the same as those the subject of said Abstract 62036, except that they are plated with gold, were held dutiable at 32% percent under the provision in said paragraph 397, as modified, *supra,*supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), for articles, not specially provided for, plated with gold, or colored with gold lacquer, as claimed.