alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# OAENEN HENDERSON &COMPANY.L LC CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS • CONSULTANTS

June 19, 2012
Docket Management Facility U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590
Re: Docket Number FAA-2012-0350 3818 Bayou Rapides Road Alexandria, LA 71303-2326 Phone: 318-445-4585 Toll-Free: 800-738-6800

I= 

## Sb Fax: 318-442-1138 www.dhc-cpas.com

I am a private pilot, single engine land, instrument rated. My log book has about 1,100 hours, 750 of which are in a high-performance, retractable gear aircraft. Ifly for both business and pleasure and my last cross countrytripwas toJacksonville, Florida to attend a college graduation. It was a pleasure for the three of us to fly on "our schedule" and to avoid the airlines and airportstress. Istronglysupportthe EAA/AOPA Medical exemption request. I have a Class Ill physical and before each flight, Icheck the weather and whetherwe should go or not. The second whether revolves around my state of body and mind- a self-check. The day after my Class Ill medical is issued it is obsolete, in that it is up to me on a day to day basis to assess my ability to 

### fly safely. Therefore, a driver's license, selfassessing system would remove a burden from thetax payer

## I pilotas well as save the Federal Government millions ofdollars to administertests and licenses. In lieu ofthe Class Ill medical the FAA should develop education programs about health and weather and perhaps require proofofattendance at Webinars and/or in person seminars. Education is the key and should replace the need for a CLASS Ill medical, a rule that has outlived its usefulness. I participate in the FAA WINGS program and love it. These classes are very current, very practical and help me on the ground as well as in the air. Sincerely,

# B&tl.~,~~)v.

jacquelynS. Daenen, CPA. CCIFP • Boyle

### J. Henderson

### Jr., CPA • HeatherN. Sellers, CPA. CFE, CFF •juliusW. Crump III, CPA Lucy H. Pearson,CPA • Sara R. O'Brien, CPA • Chrystal L. Mabou, CPA. CITP • MarthaM. Cade, CPA
<Page>
                                                                 Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Eleanor L. Thomas, President (chief executive officer) of
the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the 'Managing
Owner'), of World Monitor Trust--Series C ('Series C'), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) Series C's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
       27, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
       date hereof (the 'Quarterly Report'), fully complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series C.

/s/ Eleanor L. Thomas
------------------------------------------------------
Eleanor L. Thomas
President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner
November 12, 2002

   The undersigned, Steven Weinreb, Chief Financial Officer of the managing
owner, the Managing Owner, of Series C, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

   (1) Series C's Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series C.

/s/ Steven Weinreb
------------------------------------------------------
Steven Weinreb
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner
November 12, 2002
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Banknote Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31,
2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Gentile, Senior Vice President Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

                                             /s/ Patrick J. Gentile
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Patrick J. Gentile
                                             Senior Vice President Finance and
                                             Chief Financial Officer


Date: April 30, 2004
1

The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of

Minnesota.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-4070

___________

State of Minnesota, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Philander Dermont Jenkins, Jr., * 

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: October 7, 2005

Filed: October 12, 2005

___________

Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Philander Dermont Jenkins sought to remove a criminal case pending against

him in Hennepin County, Minnesota, to federal court under 28 U.S.C. § 1443. The

district court1

 summarily remanded the action to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1446(c)(4). This appeal followed.

We note our authority to review whether the district court erred in denying

removal under section 1443, see 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d), and we agree with the district
-2-

court that Jenkins failed to show sufficient grounds to support his invocation of

section 1443, see 28 U.S.C. § 1443; Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780, 792, 797-99

(1966); City of Greenwood v. Peacock, 384 U.S. 808, 826-27, 832 (1966).

Accordingly, we affirm.

______________________________
**FY 2023 Scenario Updates**

Page 2 of 2                                        IRC Handout 02/15/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CERTAINTEED CORPORATION : CIVIL ACTION

V. :

BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION : NO. 02-2677

BOISE CASCADE CORPORATION : CIVIL ACTION

V. :

CERTAINTEED CORPORATION : NO. 02-4385

ORDER OF CONSOLIDATION

AND NOW, this 24th day of July, 2002, upon consideration of the agreement of the

parties to consolidate the above actions pursuant to Rule 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,

and it appearing that the above cases involve common questions of law and fact, IT IS

ORDERED that the above entitled actions are hereby consolidated for all purposes

and that Civil Action No. 02-2677 shall be the lead case; and it is further

ORDERED that all future pleadings shall be filed under Civil Action No. 02-2677;

and it is further 

ORDERED that Civil Action Number 02-4385 is hereby closed for statistical

purposes.

By agreement of the parties, all demands for jury trial are withdrawn.

 _________________________________

 William H. Yohn, Jr., Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04385-WY Document 2 Filed 07/25/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 53978.

#### Bellows & Co., Inc., and G. & N. Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 136978-K and 136973-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 117 The People &c., Appellant, v. Sparkle Daniel, Respondent.

David P. Stromes, for appellant. Natalie Rea, for respondent.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Appeal dismissed upon the ground that the reversal by the Appellate Division was not "on the law alone or upon the law and such facts which, but for the determination of law, would not have led to reversal" (CPL 450.90[2][a]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.
Decided June 30, 2016
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Terry Prichard, is the Chief Financial Officer of Pocahontas
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).



This statement is
being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report).



By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement
is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                |  |                   
|--------------- |  | ------------------
|August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Terry Prichard
|Dated           |  | Terry Prichard
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 1 of 12

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 29 Att. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-6 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 12 of 12
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**GEORGE GILMORE,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON**
**PLEAS, PRESIDENT JUDGE SHEILA A. WOODS-SKIPPER, CHRISTOPHER**  **THOMAS, DIRECTOR CMR/PPS,**

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 93 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 27th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Revie w/Writ of** 

**Mandamus is** DENIED **, the Motion to Dismiss is** DISMISSED AS MOOT **, and the**

**Prothonotary is** DIRECTED **to strike the name of the jurist from the caption.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
Case 2:05-cv-05878-MAM Document 8 Filed 12/01/09 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-05878-MAM Document 8 Filed 12/01/09 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-K of  Saucony,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  for the year ended January 3, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned,  John H.
Fisher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of the  operations of the
     Company.


Dated:  April 3, 2003                            /s/ John H. Fisher
                                                 John H. Fisher
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
O 374% flt

1 

## A UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECflON AGENCY 

## / REGION IX ‘t 75 Hawthorne Street San Franclaco, CA 941054901 

## MAR 1 2 2013 Eric Massey Director, Air Quality Division Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality 1110 West Washington St Phoenix, 4rizona 85007 Dear Mr.114aSsey: On ocher 29,2012, the Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality (ADEQ) submitted revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). We havcreviewed materials submitted with ADEQ’s submittal ofrevisions to its New Source Reviewregulations (2012 New Source Review State Implementation Plan Submission) andfound thatthey do notfulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. Specifically, while the submittal includes an underline/strikeoutversion ofChapter2 showing therevisions youpropose to make to the SIP. the submittal does not include a clean final version ofthe regulations. which is arequirement under our completeness criteria. Therefore we must deem the submittal incomplete. Please amend the submittal by submitting a clean final version ofthe proposed regulations when it becomes available. We will continue to review the current submittal, but we cannot propose any actions until your submittal is complete. Questions regarding our completeness review shouldbe directedto Roger Kohn at (415) 972-3973 or kohn.rogerepa.gov. Sincerely,

Deborah Jordan Director, Air Division

Saud a., Recycled Riper
The Health Consequences of Smoking
 

Chapter 1. Introduction and Approach to Causal Inference
 1 

Introduction 3
 

Smoking: Issues in Statistical and Causal Inference 10
 

Major Conclusions 25
 

Chapter Conclusions 25
 

References 31
 

Chapter 2. Cancer 35
 

Introduction 39
 

Lung Cancer 42
 

Laryngeal Cancer 62
 

Oral Cavity and Pharyngeal Cancers 63
 

Esophageal Cancer 116
 

Pancreatic Cancer 136
 

Bladder and Kidney Cancers 166
 

Cervical Cancer 167
 

Ovarian Cancer 171
 

Endometrial Cancer 172
 

Stomach Cancer 178
 

Colorectal Cancer 208
 

Prostate Cancer 250
 

Acute Leukemia 252
 

Liver Cancer 296
 

Adult Brain Cancer 302
 

Breast Cancer 303
 

Summary 324
 

Conclusions 324
 

References 326
 

Chapter 3. Cardiovascular Diseases 361
 

Introduction 363
 

Conclusions of Previous Surgeon General’s Reports 363
 

Biologic Basis 364
 

Smoking and Subclinical Atherosclerosis 371
 

Smoking, Coronary Heart Disease, and Sudden Death 384
 

Smoking and Cerebrovascular Disease 393
 

Smoking and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm 396
 

Summary 397
 

Conclusions 407
 

References 408
 

Chapter 4. Respiratory Diseases 421
 

Introduction 423
 

Acute Respiratory Illnesses 423
 

Chronic Respiratory Diseases 463
 

xiii 
 

 

 

 

2 Table of Contents

Surgeon General’s Report

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Conclusions 508
 

References 510
 

Chapter 5. Reproductive Effects 525
 

Introduction 527
 

Conclusions of Previous Surgeon General’s Reports 527
 

Biologic Basis 532
 

Fertility 533
 

Pregnancy and Pregnancy Outcomes 550
 

Congenital Malformations, Infant Mortality, and Child Physical and Cognitive Development 577
 

Conclusions 601
 

References 602
 

Chapter 6. Other Effects 611
 

Introduction 615
 

Diminished Health Status 615
 

Loss of Bone Mass and the Risk of Fractures 698
 

Dental Diseases 732
 

Erectile Dysfunction 767
 

Eye Diseases 777
 

Peptic Ulcer Disease 804
 

Conclusions 818
 

References 820
 

Chapter 7. The Impact of Smoking on Disease and the Benefits of Smoking Reduction 853
 

Overview 855
 

Introduction 855
 

Current Impact of Smoking 858
 

Health Benefits of Reducing Cigarette Smoking 871
 

Conclusions 876
 

Implications 877
 

Appendix 7-1: Estimating the Disease Impact of Smoking in the United States 878
 

References 888
 

Chapter 8. A Vision for the Future 895
 

Introduction 897
 

Tremendous Progress Since 1964 897
 

The Need for a Sustained Effort 898
 

The Need for a Comprehensive Approach 899
 

Continuing to Build the Scientific Foundation 899
 

Tobacco Control in the New Millennium 901
 

References 902
 

Appendix 905
 

Abbreviations 911
 

List of Tables and Figures 915
 

Index 921
 

xiv
Part 1, Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits

One of the goals the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) has envisioned for GTAS is to improve

the consistency in agency trial balance reporting. This will be accomplished through validations and edits.

The validations ensure that the attributes reported in agencies’ GTAS trial balance submissions are valid for

the USSGL account. The validations encompass both USSGL level attributes per the USSGL Attribute

Table and Treasury Account Symbol (TAS) level attributes found in the Super Master Account (SMAF).

Simple validations are those involving one attribute while special validations involve more than one attribute.

All validations are fatal.

The edits compare the agency trial balances with USSGL rules and with data from authoritative sources

such as the Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS), Fiscal Service, and the Federal Financing Bank.

The edits may be either fatal or proposed. Fiscal Service will use the proposed edits only for analytical

purposes. Fiscal Service disclaims any role or responsibility with the agency auditor relationship concerning

the GTAS fatal and proposed analytical edits.

The following are the validation and edit reports included in this section:

Section VII Page Number

GTAS Validation Summary Report (VSR) VII VSR - 1

GTAS Validation Detail Report (VDR) VII VDR - 1

GTAS Edits Summary Report (ESR) VII ESR - 1

GTAS Edits Detail Report (EDR) VII EDR - 1

GTAS Closing Edits Report (CER) VII CER - 1

Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PETER A. TAYLOR, 

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0981 LKK KJM P

vs.

TOM L. CAREY,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

For the same reason set forth in the court’s order of May 2, 2006, petitioner’s June

23, 2006 “motion for discovery” is denied without prejudice. Petitioner is warned, for the second

time, that if he fails to follow court orders in the future he may be sanctioned, possibly with

dismissal of this action under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DATED: August 11, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

tayl0981.dwp 

Case 2:04-cv-00981-LKK -KJM Document 29 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

October 6, 1948

No. 52582.

protests 41986-K, etc. (Baltimore).

#### Hutzler Bros. Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon of the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-0878-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

C/O KISSENGER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 12, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 65 Filed 03/13/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 12, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ April 28, 2006 motion to dismiss pursuant to non-enumerated

Rule 12(b) is granted as to Claims Five, Six, Ten, and Eleven and denied in all other respects;

3. Plaintiff’s Claims Five and Eleven against defendant Norlin and Claims Six

and Ten against defendant Runnels is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust

administrative remedies on those claims before bringing this action; and

4. Defendants Kissinger, Baker, Peery, Qualls, Money, Ingwerson, and Garrison

shall file an answer to plaintiff’s complaint.

Dated: March 12, 2007

 

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 65 Filed 03/13/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 66799.

#### Ira Furman Co. *v.*United States,

protests 296609-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Bao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.