alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40983 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

LEONARDO MARTINEZ TORRES, also known as Leo Torres, also known as Tiger

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:13

- CR

- 99

- 1

Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Leonardo Martinez Torres (Torres)

has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with
Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d
229 (5th Cir. 2011). Torres h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 8, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40983 Document: 00513372414 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/08/2016No. 14

- 40983

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous
issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-40983 Document: 00513372414 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/08/2016
No. 58956.

protest 243920-K (New York).

#### Artgift Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s action, the protest was overruled.
# sec5_sf133_schp_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2020-10	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2020
No. 54617.

#### Quong Hing *v.*United States,

protest 80269-K (New York).

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise the subject of this protest is described on the invoice as “Celluloid Chopstiek” and was assessed with duty at the rate of 50 cents per pound and 40 per centum ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 1539 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 1539 (b)), which, so far as pertinent, read as follows:

> Par. 1539. * * *

> (b) Laminated products * * *; manufactures wholly or in chief value of any of the foregoing, or of any other product of which any synthetic resin or resin-like substance is the chief binding agent, * * *.

The protest claim is for duty at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under either the nonenumerated manufactured articles provision in paragraph 1558 of the same act, or the provision for manufactures of amber or wax in paragraph 1536.

When the protest was called for trial counsel for the plaintiff called to the stand a chemist employed in the United States Customs Laboratory at New York who had made an analysis of a sample of the merchandise in question. The witness testified that analysis of the sample showed that it was composed of synthetic phenolic resin with a little coloring matter; that the synthetic phenolic resin did not in any way act as a binding agent; and that except for the small amount of coloring matter the article was wholly made of synthetic resin.

*258The chemist’s report, corroborating his testimony, was offered and received in evidence without objection as plaintiff’s exhibit 1, and the records in the following cases were, on motion of plaintiff’s counsel to which no objection was made, incorporated as part of the record in this case: *Fan Co. et al.*v. *United States,*14 Cust. Ct. 180, Abstract 49907; *Mimosa American Corp.*v. *United States,*15 Cust. Ct. 338, Abstract 50728; and *Tuck High & Co.*v. *United States,*16 Cust. Ct. 230, Abstract 50912.

Those cases related to various items of imported merchandise, including mah jong sets, exposure meters, and playing cards, all composed in chief value of synthetic resin, not laminated nor made of laminated products, and in which the synthetic resin did not act as a binding agent. It was there held that in view of these facts the merchandise was excluded from classification under paragraph 1539 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and, as there is no provision for manufactures composed wholly or in chief value of synthetic resin, either directly or by similitude, that it was properly dutiable at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 1558 of the tariff act for nonenumerated manufactured articles.

The protest claim for duty at the rate of 20 per centum under paragraph 1558 is therefore sustained as to the merchandise described on the invoice as “Celluloid Chopstick,” and judgment will issue accordingly.
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

Number Name Description

Fatal/Proposed

Analytical Type

Applicable SMAF Attribute

 / Domain Value Left Side Labe

4

Fund Resources Equals Fund Equities

The sum of USSGL

accounts that comprise Fund Resources must equal the sum of USSGL accounts that constitute Fund Equities.

Fatal Period # 10/11/12 USSGL / USSGL Account Type = EXPND Fund Resources 

44

Reclassified Balance Sheet Check

The Total Assets line must equal the Total Liabilities and Net Position line.

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12

Statement Line / Statement Line All Total Assets

67

Budgetary Resources Derived from Available Special and Trust Fund Receipt Accounts

The total End balance for

USSGL accounts 411400 

and 413810 must equal the 

balance for BETCs related to collections to available receipts in the Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS).

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

161

Normal balance post closing check for undelivered orders - obligations, unpaid

The sum of the USSGL accounts must be less than zero.

Fatal Period # 09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All TAS Status = U USSGL Account Nu

162

Normal balance post closing check for delivered orders - obligations, unpaid

The sum of the USSGL accounts must be less than zero.

Fatal Period # 09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All TAS Status = U USSGL Account Nu

193

Disaster Emergency Fund Code "AAB" Balance Check

The sum of the pre-closing

ending balances of USSGL accounts with Disaster Emergency Fund Code "AAB" must equal zero for each reported TAS.

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All USSGL Accounts 

194

Disaster Emergency Fund Code "AAC" Balance Check

The sum of the pre-closing

ending balances of USSGL accounts with Disaster Emergency Fund Code "AAC" must equal zero for each reported TAS.

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All USSGL Accounts 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Summary Report

Bulletin No. 2023-04 DRAFT VII ESR - 1 
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

Number Name Description

Fatal/Proposed

Analytical Type

Applicable SMAF Attribute

 / Domain Value Left Side Labe

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Summary Report

195

Normal balance post closing check for undelivered orders - obligations, unpaid

The sum of the USSGL accounts must be less than zero.

Proposed Analytical USSGL / Zero TAS Status = E USSGL Account Nu

196

Normal balance post closing check for delivered orders - obligations, unpaid

The sum of the USSGL accounts must be less than zero.

Proposed Analytical USSGL / Zero TAS Status = E USSGL Account Nu

197

Disaster Emergency Fund Code "AAD" Balance Check

The sum of the pre-closing

ending balances of USSGL accounts with Disaster Emergency Fund Code "AAD" must equal zero for each reported TAS.

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All USSGL Accounts 

Bulletin No. 2023-04 DRAFT VII ESR - 2
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1388 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to repeal the requirement for voting 

assistance officers for members of the Armed Forces. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2017 

Mr. ROUNDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to repeal the requirement for voting assistance officers for members of the 

Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR VOTING AS4 SISTANCE OFFICERS FOR MEMBERS OF THE 

5 ARMED FORCES. 

6 Section 1566 of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended by striking subsection (f). 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-1-

Gilbert Khachadourian Jr. (SBN 154413)

WATSON, KHACHADOURIAN & IAMS, LLP

1000 G Street, 2nd Floor

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 498-6240

Facsimile: (916) 498-6245

Attorneys for Appellee

JEFFERSON PILOT SECURITIES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

In Re:

CLAUDE G. COSSU,

Debtor,

CLAUDE G. COSSU,

Appellant,

v.

JEFFERSON PILOT SECURITIES,

Appellee.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

District Court Case Number:

CV-04-00502 MCE

Bankruptcy Court Case Number:

No. 01-25730-C-7

Adversary Proceeding Number:

No. 01-2397-C

AMENDED ORDER ON

STIPULATION REMANDING

CASE TO BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-captioned adversary proceeding

is hereby ordered remanded to the United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of

California, Sacramento Division, for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the

United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit Ninth in this case. 

///

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-00502-MCE Document 37 Filed 08/31/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-2-

The August 29, 2005 status conference is hereby vacated.

DATED: August 31, 2005

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00502-MCE Document 37 Filed 08/31/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust III (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III


                              By:  /s/  MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel*
                              Title:   Regular Trustee










Dated: August 14, 2009
----------------------

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vitasti, Inc.  (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tammy-Lynn McNabb,
      Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: April
      6,
      2006


By: /s/
      TAMMY-LYNN MCNABB





Name:
       Tammy-Lynn McNabb


Title:
         Chief Executive Officer
Before the Second Division,

October 9, 1946

No. 51342.

#### Protests 20636-K, etc., of Fulton County Silk Mills et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of knit fabric the same in all material respects as the fabric of which the gloves the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333) were made. In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
STATEMENT OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME AND RETAINED EARNINGS AND THE STATEMENT
OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL CONDITION AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     OCT-31-1997 <F1>
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,700
<SECURITIES>                                   114,200
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,223,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (12,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          12,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,810,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      1,082,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     116,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,810,600
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               234,900
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   73,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 74,600
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (28,900)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1> THE CORPORATION'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL CONDITION IS UNCLASSIFIED;
THEREFORE, THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN CURRENT AND LONG-TERM ASSETS AND
LIABILITIES IS NOT AVAILABLE.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3883 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3883

To appropriate funds for the Office for Civil Rights of the Department 
                             of Education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2024

Mr. Casey (for himself, Mr. Fetterman, Ms. Rosen, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. 
  Sanders, Ms. Butler, and Mr. Kaine) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Appropriations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To appropriate funds for the Office for Civil Rights of the Department 
                             of Education.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Showing Up for Students Act''.

SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR THE OFFICE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 
              EDUCATION.

    In addition to amounts otherwise made available, there is 
appropriated, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise 
appropriated, for expenses necessary for the Office for Civil Rights of 
the Department of Education, as established under section 203 of the 
Department of Education Organization Act (20 U.S.C. 3413), $280,000,000 
for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2024, to remain available 
until September 30, 2025.
                                 <all>
```
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
ELMER E. CAMPBELL, J R., Petitioner,

v.

MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD, Respondent,

AND

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE,
Intervenor.

______________________

2013

- 3166

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF0752100331 -M- 1.

______________________

O R D E R

______________________ Before N EWMAN
, L OURIE
, and D YK
, Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM

. Mr. Elmer E. Campbell has taken an appeal from the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”). Campbell v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd. , Appeal No. 13

- 3166 (Oct.CAMPBELL v. MSPB 2

9, 2013), ECF No. 12. Mr. Campbell’s brief states that his union “filed a grievance on the identical issues raised before the MSPB on November 12, 2009,” and that “USPS settled these issues, and issued a Regular Regional Pre

- [A]rbitration Settlement with bac k pay for the period November 12, 2009 to March 2, 2012.” Pet’r Br. at 2.

The Board in its brief states that this settlement “may provide full relief to Mr. Campbell as it relates to this matter[.]” Resp’t Br. at 10 n.2. The United States Postal Service (“USPS”), as Intervenor, provides a copy of the settlement agreement.

No party has moved for or otherwise requested, di smissal of this appeal. However, “A case becomes moot

— and therefore no longer a “Case or Controversy” for pu rposes of Article III

— when the issues presented are no longer ‘live’ or the parties lack a legally cognizable inte rest in the outcome.” Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. , 133 S. Ct. 721, 726

– 27 (2013) (citations omitted)

. Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Mr. Campbell is directed to show cause, within 14 days of the date of receipt of this order, why this petition sho uld not be dismissed as moot . The Board and USPS are also directed to respond within that time.

F OR THE C OURT

November 20, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date D aniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

cc: Nicholas Jabbour Lindsey Schreckengost
No. 61314.

protest 302049-K (New York).

#### Air Clearance Association, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that duty was assessed on a net weight of 620 pounds, and that the correct net weight of the merchandise was 3.2 pounds per dozen for the slip-on type sweaters and 4.7 pounds per dozen for the cardigan-type sweaters, a total of 395 pounds for the entire shipment, the protest was sustained, and the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry accordingly.
No. 61819.

#### Dulien Steel Products, Inc., of Calif, et al. *v.*United States,

protest 182770-K.

C. D. 1969. Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing denied.
#### Crockett *vs.*The State of Georgia.

An indictment for arson does not include the offence of malicious mischief, and although the indictment charged that the defendant wilfully and maliciously set fire to a dwelling-house, the defendant could not be found guilty of the offence of malicious mischief thereunder. Such a verdict having been found, a motion in arrest of judgment should have been sustained.

(a) Section 4627 of the code construed.

October 11, 1887.

Criminal law. Malicious mischief. Arson. Before Judge Richard H. Clark. Pulton superior court. March term, 1887.

Reported in the decision.

R. J. Jordan, for plaintiff in error.

O. D. Hill, solicitor-general, for the State.

Simmons, Justice.

Lucy Crockett was indicted by the grand jury of Pulton county for the offence of felony. • The specification was: “ that said Lucy Crockett, in the county aforesaid, on the 31st of January, in the year 1887, with force and arms, did wilfully and maliciously set fire to the dwelling-house of George Allen, said dwelling-house being in the city of Atlanta, contrary,” etc.

Upon the trial of the case, the following verdict was returned by the jury: “We find the defendant guilty of malicious mischief.” After the return of the verdict, she moved the court to arrest the judgment, on the ground, among others, that the defendant was indicted for the of-*105fence of arson, and was not indicted for malicious mischief; that malicious mischief is not included in arson. The court denied 'the motion, and to this the defendant excepted and brings the case here and assigns error.

We think that the court erred in not granting the motion and arresting the judgment. The defendant was in-dieted for a specific crime, well-defined in the code, to-wit, setting fire to a dwelling-house in a city. She ought to have been convicted of this offence, or an attempt to commit it, or acquitted. That would have exhausted this indictment. The section of the code, 4627, that all other acts of wilful and malicious mischief in the injuring or destroying other property, not therein enumerated, shall be punished, does not, in our opinion, embrace any crime already defined in the penal code. It means simply that any other acts of a wilful and malicious nature, not provided for and not enumerated, shall be prosecuted, and a conviction had under this section. Not that where an act has been made a crime by another section, and contains elements ofwilfulness and malice, the jury can acquit of that and convict of malicious mischief.

Judgment reversed.