alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 1, 2014

Order 

Clerk

July 1, 2014

149229(42)

WILLIAM LUCKETT, IV, a Minor, by his

Next Friends, BEVERLY LUCKETT and

WILLIAM LUCKETT,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

SC: 149229

v COA: 313280

Macomb CC: 2010-004265-NI

RICK KITTELL,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

SOUTH MACOMB DISPOSAL AUTHORITY,

a/k/a SOUTH MACOMB SANITARY DISTRICT, 

SOUTHEAST MACOMB SANITARY DISTRICT, 

a/k/a SOUTH MACOMB SANITARY DISTRICT, 

and PATRICK O’CONNELL,

Defendants-Appellees.

__________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Municipal League, the 

Michigan Townships Association, and the Public Corporation Law Section of the State 

Bar of Michigan to participate as amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief 

submitted on June 26, 2014, in support of the application for leave to appeal is accepted 

for filing.
The State 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 16, 2015

No. 04-15-00608-CR

Kevin Johnson,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011CR0685

Honorable Steve Hilbig, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file their brief is GRANTED. We order the 

brief due January 4, 2016. 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of December, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned herebycertifies, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of American Bank NoteHolographics, Inc. (the “Company”), that the Quarterly Report of the Company onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatthe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the periodcovered by the Report and the results of operations of the Company for theperiod covered by the Report.

 

 
|                       | By: /s/ Alan  Goldstein                                                |   |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | Alan  Goldstein                                                        |
|                       | Vice  President, Chief Financial Officer and  Chief Accounting Officer |
|                       |                                                                   |   |
|                       |                                                                   |   |
| Date:  August 2, 2004 |                                                                   |   |
|                            |                                                                        |        |  |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appearsin typed form within the electronic version of this written statement requiredby Section 906, has been provided to American Bank Note Holographics, Inc.and will be retained by American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

----------------------------------------- Application of : : BALTIA AIR LINES, INC. (BALTIA) : : DOCKET DOT-OST-2007-0007 for Waiver of Dormancy : : : (New York-St. Petersburg) :

----------------------------------------- SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION OF BALTIA AIR LINES, INC ("BALTIA")

FOR WAIVER OF DORMANCY PROVISION OF 14 CFR 294.7 AND REQUEST TO FILE OUT OF TIME. Baltia Air Lines, Inc. ("Baltia"), provides the documents listed on the Index to supplement its application for a waiver from the revocation for dormancy provisions of Section 204.7 (14 CFR § 204.7)that was filed on March 9, 2011.a) BALTIA AIR LINES, INC. By: ___________/s/________________________ Steffanie J. Lewis General Counsel Baltia Air Lines, Inc THE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW FIRM P.C. 1915 Eye Street, NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 20006-2118 Telephone: 202 296 1111 Facsimile: 202 296 1175 Email: slewis@iblf.com
Date: March 14, 2011BALTIA AIR LINES SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT INDEX

DOC No. DOCUMENT PAGES 11. HSBC Letter by VP and Branch Manager dated March 10, 2011. 43 12. D. Lipton Verification Letter .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44 13. Certification Costs Remaining .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that, this 14th day of March, 2011, the foregoing SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION FOR WAIVER OF DORMANCY has been served by Email upon the following: Via e-mail on the following persons. jeffrey.manley@united.com; carl.nelson@aa.com; howard_kass@usairways.com; rbkeiner@crowell.com; nssparks@fedex.com; recohn@hhlaw.com; prrizzi@hhlaw.com; msinick@ssd.com; hkamen@coair.com; sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com; dvaughan@kelleydrye.com; rpommer@atlasair.com; ben.graves@evergreenaviation.com; daniel.commins@evergreenaviation.com; sametta.c.barnett@delta.com; scott.mcclain@delta.com; Mark.treadaway@mwaa.com; donald.fields@mwaa.com; sbrocchi@panynj.gov; john.krepp@faa.gov

_______/s/___________________ Steffanie J. Lewis

Baltia : JFK-LED - page 2DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------ Application of : : BALTIA AIR LINES, INC. (BALTIA) : : DOCKET DOT-OST-2007-0007 for Waiver of Dormancy : : : (New York-St. Petersburg) :

------------------------------------ SUPPLEMENT TO APPLICATION OF BALTIA AIR LINES, INC ("BALTIA")

FOR WAIVER OF DORMANCY PROVISION OF 14 CFR 294.7 AND REQUEST TO FILE OUT OF TIME.
Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to: Igor Dmitrowsky President & CEO BALTIA AIR LINES, INC. 63-25 Saunders Street, Suite 7I Rego Park, New York 11374 Steffanie J. Lewis General Counsel Baltia Air Lines, Inc. THE INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LAW FIRM, PC 1915 Eye Street, NW, Suite 500 Telephone: 202 296 1111 Facsimile: 202 296 1175 Email: slewis@iblf.com March 14, 2011
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4073 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4073

To prohibit the use of funds to waive certain sanctions with respect to 
                                 Iran.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 23 (legislative day, March 22), 2024

   Mr. Cruz introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the use of funds to waive certain sanctions with respect to 
                                 Iran.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING THE USE OF FUNDS TO WAIVE CERTAIN SANCTIONS WITH 
              RESPECT TO IRAN.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds 
appropriated for fiscal year 2024 may be obligated or expended to make 
a determination or issue a waiver pursuant to--
            (1) section 1245(d)(5) of the National Defense 
        Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8513a(d)(5)); 
        or
            (2) section 1244(i) or 1247(f) of the Iran Freedom and 
        Counter-Proliferation Act of 2012 (22 U.S.C. 8803(i) and 
        8806(f)).
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Horizon Medical Products,
Inc. (the "Corporation") for the period ended March 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.



/s/ Marshall B. Hunt
-----------------------------------------------------
Marshall B. Hunt
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
No. 59525.

#### Lo Curto & Funk *v.*United States,

protest 224455-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “purified cerium oxyde,” which is not smalts, frostings, and all ceramic and glass colors, fluxes, glazes, and enamels, ground or pulverized, but is a chemical compound, other than ajinomoto and other monosodium glutamate preparations, ammonium silicofluoride, Haarlem oil, and products chiefly vised as assistants in preparing or finishing textiles, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

C/O KISSENGER, et al.,

Defendants.

2:04-CIV-0878 GEB DAD P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ FIRST REQUEST

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S

DISCOVERY REQUESTS

Defendants have filed a request for extension of time to respond to plaintiff’s discovery

requests. Plaintiff has filed objections. Good cause appearing, Defendants are granted a 30-day

extension of time to respond to Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests. Defendants’ responses to

Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests shall be due on or before Tuesday, June 5, 2007.

DATED: May 10, 2007.

/davi0878.36disc

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 74 Filed 05/11/07 Page 1 of 1
NO. 07-07 -030 0-CR IN THE CO URT OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL B AU GU ST 6, 2 007

_________

_________

_________

___ KE L L Y LYNN CH AI RE S- DYA L S F RY, Appel lan t
v. THE S TATE OF TEXAS, Appel lee

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE 33 rd DIS T RI CT COU RT OF B URN ET COU NT Y; NO. 175 13-C; HON. GUILFORD L. JONES, III, PRES IDING

_________

_________

_________

____ ORDER OF DISMISSAL

_________

_________

_________

____ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Appel lan t, Kel ly

Ly nn Cha ires- Dyals F ry , app eal s h er co nv icti on for three c ounts of theft of $1500 or

m ore but less than $20,000. The cer ti ficat ion of ri g ht t o appea l ex ecut ed bythe t r i a l c o u rts t a t e s t h a t“ t h i s i s a p l e a b a rg a i n c a s e a n d t h e D e fe n d a n th a s N O r ig ht of appeal .” Thi s c ircums tanc e w as broug ht to the atten ti on of ap pel lan t, and opp ortuni ty
w as g ran te d he r to ob ta i n an am en de d c er ti fi c at i on en ti tl i ng he r to ap pe al

. No such
cer ti ficat ion w as re cei v ed w it hin the ti m e we al lotted. H av ing recei v ed no cer ti ficat ion2

aut horizi ng an app eal, we dismiss the a ppe al per T exas Rule of A p p e ll a te Proce dure 25. 2(d). The appeal i s d is mis sed.
Per C ur iam Do not p ubl is h.
No. 49141.

#### Protests 102772-K, etc., of Meyer & Lange et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The collector’s letter and also a statement of goods remaining in warehouse on the effective date of said trade agreement were admitted in evidence at the trial without objection by the Government. As the bottles in question were withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to the effective date of said trade agreement, the claim at *Ye*cent per pound was sustained.
October 25, 1957

No. 61296.

Suit 4928.

#### United States *v.*Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni.

A. R. D. 74. (Appeal dismissed October 10, 1957.)
Before the Second Division,

October 16, 1946

No. 51358.

#### Protests 543288-G, etc., of Lewis & Locke, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
## In T he Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 22 - 00152 - CR
ELLIOT VENTURA , A

PPELLANT V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , APPELLEE On Appeal from the 100th District Court Carson County, Texas Trial Court No . 7100 , Honorable Stuart Messer , Presiding



### November 21 , 2022 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before QUINN, C.J., and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ. Appellant , Elliot Ventura, appeals his conviction for evading arrest 1 and sentence to thirty years’ confinement. The appellate record was o riginally due September 14, 2022

. The clerk ’ s record has been filed but we granted the reporter an extension of time to file the reporter ’ s record due to her caseload

. By letter of October 11, 2022 , we admonished the reporter that failure to file the reporter ’ s record by October 24 c ould result in the appeal

1 See T EX
. P ENAL C ODE A NN . § 38.04.2

being abated and the cause remanded to the trial court for further proceedings without further notice

. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed and the reporter has had no further communication with this Court. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 35.3(c) ( “ The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. ” ); 37.3(a)(2) (requiring appellate courts to “ make whatever order is appropriate to avoid further delay and to preserve the parties ’ rights ” when the appellate record is not timely filed). On remand, the trial court shal l determine the following: 1. what tasks remain to complete the filing of the reporter ’ s record; 2. why the reporter has not completed the necessary tasks; 3. what amount of time is reasonably necessary for the completion of those tasks; and 4. w hether the reporter can complete the tasks within the time the trial court finds reasonable. Should the trial court determine that the reporter will require more than thirty days to complete, certify, and file the reporter ’ s record, it shall arrange for a substitute reporter to do so. The trial court is directed to enter such orders necessary to address the aforementioned questions. So too shall it include its findings on those matters in a supplemental clerk ’ s record and cause that record to be filed with this C ourt by December 21 , 2022

.3

Should the reporter file the record on or before December 5, 2022, s he is directed to immediately notify the trial court of the filing, in writing, whereupon the trial court shall not be required to take any further action. It is so ordered. Per Curiam Do not publish.
**Exhibit 32.3**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wisconsin Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Chief Financial Officer

 

February 28, 2008
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DONALD LEE IVANS, No. CIV-S-04-0013 MCD/DAD P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

GLENN TOPPENBERG, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a former state prisoner proceeding pro se, has

filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On August 4, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days.

///

Case 2:04-cv-00013-MCE -DAD Document 27 Filed 09/20/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

 Plaintiff filed a letter on August 25, 2005, indicating that he wished to proceed with this

1

action against defendant Croll. However, in a confusing statement, plaintiff adds, “Also, with

the respect of the court I would like to request ‘Objections to Magistrate Judge’s findings and

recommendations to this court case # CIV-S-04-0013 MCE DAD P.” (Letter, filed 8/25/05, at

1.) No other statement or clarification are made about this request. Therefore, the court will

infer that plaintiff does not object to the dismissal of defendant Neal.

2

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.1

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 4, 2005,

are adopted in full; and

2. The claims against defendant Neal are dismissed without

prejudice.

DATED: September 19, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00013-MCE -DAD Document 27 Filed 09/20/05 Page 2 of 2
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View an Accounting Code

To view an accounting code, complete the following steps: 

1. From the Administration tab, click Manage Organizations>Accounting Codes>View. 

The View Accounting Codes page appears.

2. Select the highest-level organization endpoint accounting codes available to view. The View 

Accounting Codes page appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. View Accounting Codes

• Only active accounting codes available for deposit processing and check processing 

(if applicable) appear. 

• Under the Active Accounting Code table, both Treasury Account Symbols (TAS) 

and accounting codes not identified as TAS display.

• If an accounting code is a TAS, a check mark displays under the TAS column and 

the Share Accounting Module (SAM) validation status (Valid, Invalid or In Process) 

displays under the Validation Status column.

Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

Application Tips

Additional Button
No. 48480.

#### Protests 990431-G, etc., of F. Javier Molieri et al. (Galveston, etc.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 4.72


 





 


January 31, 2008


 


BY PERSONAL DELIVERY


 


Mr. Mark Oleksiw


4265 Pinewood


Pierrefonds, Québec 
H9H 2W1


 


Re:
Employment Agreement


 


Dear Mark:


 


Further
to our recent discussions, we hereby confirm that your employment agreement
with DRAXIS Health Inc. dated March 9, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”)
is hereby amended as follows:


 


·                  By
deleting Section 3 and replacing it with the following Section 3:


 


You
will be entitled to participate in all benefit plans which the DRAXIS Group
shall, from time to time make available to its executive employees, subject to
applicable eligibility rules thereof. 
The benefits currently offered are:


·                  major medical


·                  drug


·                  dental


·                  group life


·                  short and long term disability


·                  accidental death and dismemberment


 


You will also be entitled
to an amount of up to 5% of your Base Salary, which exact percentage shall be
determined from year to year in lieu of participation in DRAXIS’ Retirement
Savings Program. (the “DRSP Amount”)


 


·                  By
deleting Section 13(c) and replacing it with the following Section 13(c):


 


(c)                                  Termination
by DRAXIS Without Serious Reason and Without Notice


 


DRAXIS may
terminate this Agreement and your employment hereunder, in its sole discretion,
Without Notice and Without Serious Reason, effective immediately upon the date
you are advised of the termination (the “Date of Termination”)


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


DRAXIS
HEALTH  INC. / SANTÉ DRAXIS INC.


16751 Route Trans Canada Highway, Kirkland, Québec, Canada H9H 4J4  Tel: (514) 694-8220 Fax: (514) 694-8201
No. 58517.

protests 228948-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of magnesium articles similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 316, C. D. 1620) and that said articles are unfinished parts of internal-combustion engines of the carburetor type similar to those involved in *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited decisions, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.