alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CRAFT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CIV S-04-0780 MCE KJM PS

JAMES ROCHE,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se and in forma pauperis. By order filed

April 26, 2005, plaintiff was directed to submit completed USM-285 forms for service of

summons on defendant. Although plaintiff has submitted a USM-285 form, the address

identified on the form is insufficient for service of summons on the named defendant. See

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i). Plaintiff therefore will be granted an extension of time to

submit a form with sufficient information to properly serve defendant.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the court with

a completed USM-285 form for the defendant named in the complaint with addresses identified

therein which comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) and a copy of the complaint and 

Case 2:04-cv-00780-MCE -KJM Document 15 Filed 08/23/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

exhibits filed January 27, 2005.

2. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

DATED: August 22, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

craft.insuff

Case 2:04-cv-00780-MCE -KJM Document 15 Filed 08/23/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CRAFT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CIV S-04-0780 MCE KJM PS

JAMES ROCHE,

Defendant. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

 OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 completed summons form

 completed USM-285 forms

 copies of the complaint

 

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-00780-MCE -KJM Document 15 Filed 08/23/05 Page 3 of 3
No. 46092.

#### Protest 43387-K of R. U. Delapenha & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of preserved ginger composed in part of manufactured sugar the same as that the subject of Abstract 45762. It was therefore held not subject to the tax in question.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KRISTIN C. PEREZ HAINES : CIVIL ACTION

:

: NO. 02-CV-4432

v. :

:

RODNEY GENE LEE, et al. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of May, 2003, you are advised that the Court will conduct a

Settlement Conference on June 4, 2003 at 2:30 p.m. in the Judge’s Chambers, Fifth Floor,

United States Courthouse, 601 Market St., Philadelphia, PA 19106.

The senior attorney in charge of the matter for each of the parties, AND THE PARTIES

THEMSELVES, or if a corporation, an official of the corporation with full and final settlement

authority, are required to attend the conference in person. If a party is more than one hundred

miles from Philadelphia and prior permission is given by the Court, that party may participate by

telephone. The parties and counsel must be prepared to discuss settlement or other disposition of

the matter. Counsel are directed to fax confidential position papers not longer than two pages

directly to Chambers (fax no. 215-580-2281), no later than two business days prior to the date of

the conference. The position paper should address the party’s settlement position, as well as any

other issues that counsel believes will be of assistance to the Court in helping the parties resolve

this matter. POSITION PAPERS ARE NOT TO BE SHARED WITH OPPOSING

COUNSEL OR FILED OF RECORD. THEY ARE FOR THE COURT’S REVIEW

ONLY.

BY THE COURT:

 

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04432-BWK Document 16 Filed 05/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 52935.

#### Belimar Liquor Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 137757-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0776 LKK EFB P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al.

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On April 12, 2012, plaintiff filed “objections” to the magistrate judge’s order filed

March 12, 2012, which the court construes as a request for reconsideration. Pursuant to E.D.

Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s order shall be upheld unless “clearly erroneous or

contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the

magistrate judge’s order, directing the filing of pretrial statements, was clearly erroneous or

contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed March 12, 2012, is affirmed. 

DATED: June 11, 2012.

1

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 222 Filed 06/11/12 Page 1 of 1
Letter Agreement



 Exhibit 10.4 
 June 30, 2008 
 Manitex LiftKing, ULC 
 3000 South Austin Avenue 
 Georgetown, Texas 78626 
 Ladies and Gentlemen: 
  

	1.	As used in this letter, the following terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below: 

 “American Note” shall mean the U.S. $4,500,000 Master Revolving Note dated as of the date hereof, from the Borrower as maker to the Bank as
payee, as amended from time to time. 
 “Bank” shall mean Comerica Bank, a Texas banking association. 
 “Borrower” shall mean Manitex LiftKing, ULC, an Alberta corporation. 
 “Borrowing Base” shall mean, as of any date, the “Advance Formula”, as such term is defined in the Advance Formula Agreement dated as
of December         , 2007, between the Borrower and the Bank, as amended from time to time on such date. 
 “Canadian Dollar Equivalent Amount” shall mean (a) with respect to any amount outstanding under the Canadian Note, such amount, and (b) with respect to any amount outstanding under the American
Note, the Canadian Dollar Exchange Amount. 
 “Canadian Dollar Exchange Amount” shall mean, as of any date, with respect to any
advance under the American Note, the amount of Canadian Dollars which is equivalent to the then outstanding principal amount of such advance at the most favorable spot exchange rate determined by the Bank to be available to it for the sale of U.S.
Dollars for Canadian Dollars at the relevant time. 
 “Canadian Dollars” or “CDN $” shall mean lawful currency of Canada.

 “Canadian Note” shall mean the CDN $4,500,000 Master Revolving Note dated December 29, 2006, from the Borrower as maker to the
Bank as payee, as amended from time to time. 
 “Indebtedness” shall mean, as of any date, the outstanding principal balance of the
Notes on such date. 







 “Maximum Loan Amount” shall mean CDN $4,500,000. 
 “Notes” shall mean the American Note and the Canadian Note. 
 “U.S. Dollars” or “U.S. $” shall mean lawful money of the United States of America. 
  

	2.	The Borrower and the Bank acknowledge and agree that the American Note is intended to offer the Borrower the opportunity to borrow in U.S. Dollars, but only in an amount such that
the Canadian Dollar Equivalent Amount of the sum of all advances outstanding under the Notes shall not exceed the lesser of the Borrowing Base and the Maximum Loan Amount. 

  

	3.	If at any time and for any reason the Canadian Dollar Equivalent Amount of all advances outstanding under the Notes shall exceed the lesser of the Maximum Loan Amount and the
Borrowing Base, the Borrower shall immediately repay an amount of the Indebtedness equal to such excess. 

  

	4.	Any breach of this letter agreement by the Borrower will be an Event of Default under the Notes. 

 If this letter clearly sets forth our understanding regarding these matters, please sign where indicated below and return to me. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	COMERICA BANK
	
	 
	James Q. Goudie


 Acknowledged and agreed to 
 as of the date set forth above: 
  

			
	MANITEX LIFTKING, ULC
		
	By:	 	/s/ David H. Gransee
	Its:	 	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
S.IU'C¥ #: 001!3 ACTUAL AIR EMISSIONS CALENDAR YEAR 2011 DM Date l'ebl"'lttry l8, 21111 &IU'C¥ N.-: CLIO INC. &aru A41/Nn: 4615 VISCOUNT AVE Collllld: ACCOUNTS PAY ABLE, BOC DESIGN lltOi SO!JRml 9TDJRTIIAN PRY Q·JAW! TSP: 0.OO'i to1al toos S02: 0. OOOb to1al tons VOC: **~"!.'>** to1al tons NOX: 0. totaltoos PB: 0,0 total tons CO: o.0ft'{ to1al tons '!ij)R DRY 9£Wj! S9U&CES ONLj'! (J) **·~** •• ___ tohllUHIII **~~PF:J"IIOiEuJIIIUd** X.0033 •tollS) _........ (2)_,......, DO OIIIJ) Ifyou were notIa buabless please at0.80 lor each criteria poll:lltut 111111 ntun. form·.so2: **·--s--'~~~¥f2R-"-'~**voC:·· ...,.c.· **·---~7<1"'~'~"'~-+f~~tli**
# sec5_sbr_2019

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No 2019-14	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Meeting Handout July 11, 2019
# sec6_rsnc_2023

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSNC - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10June 2023
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Data Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Paul K. McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Paul K. McGrath
--------------------------------
Paul K. McGrath
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002
No. 64835.

#### Norwegian Frozen Fish, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 59/27501 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 61281.

protest 293987-K (New York).

#### Jonas & Naumberg Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of undressed blown rabbit fur, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4000 

To reaffirm the applicability of the Indian Reorganization Act to the Lytton 

Rancheria of California, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2024 

Mr. PADILLA introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To reaffirm the applicability of the Indian Reorganization 

Act to the Lytton Rancheria of California, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA LAND RE4 AFFIRMATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, the Lytton Rancheria of California is subject 

7 to the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the ‘‘In8 dian Reorganization Act’’) (48 Stat. 984, chapter 576; 25 

9 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.), and the Secretary of the Interior 

10 may acquire and take into trust land for the benefit of 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4000 IS

1 the Lytton Rancheria of California pursuant to section 5 

2 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 5108). 

3 (b) LAND TO BE MADE PART OF THE RESERVA4 TION.—Land taken into trust pursuant to subsection (a) 

5 shall be— 

6 (1) part of the reservation of the Lytton 

7 Rancheria of California; and 

8 (2) administered in accordance with the laws 

9 and regulations generally applicable to property held 

10 in trust by the United States for an Indian Tribe. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 55193.

#### Fleming-Joffe, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 139416-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1410 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM033AD

2000 - 29 - 024 --- 11/18/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
No. 62532.

#### General Preserve Co. *v.*United States,

protest 330637-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bitter orange pulp the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *T. M. Duche & Sons, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 60, C. A. D. 638), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of American Bank Note Holographics,
Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period
covered by the Report and the results of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



By:

/s/ Kenneth H. TraubKenneth H. TraubPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: October 30, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. and will be retained by American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended September 24, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene B. Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ MARLENE B. DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene B. Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: November 3, 2004
_______________________

* Marlene B. Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
05.01
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GUADALUPE P. PEREZ,

Appellant,

v.

OLD WEST CAPITAL CO., Assignee of

Hudson & Keyse, L.L.C.,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00037

- CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC#2007

- 058909

- 3

- A)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and her sureties, if any, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, on the judgment and all

costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT I S SO ORDERED THIS 14TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2013.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 8 (Friday, January 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-309]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration


Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Application; 
Correction

    By Notice dated November 21, 2006, and published in the Federal 
Register on December 1, 2006, (71 FR 69590), Notice of Application, 
Hospira, Inc., 1776 North Centennial Drive, McPherson, Kansas 67460-
1247, paragraph three should be corrected to read as follows: The 
company plans to import Remifentanil for use in dosage form 
manufacturing.

    Dated: January 5, 2007.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug 
Enforcement Administration.
 [FR Doc. E7-309 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
No. 61803.

#### American Meshed Fur Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 237874-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of goatskins and sheepskins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Nawi Noonoo & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 57, C. D. 1904), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 10.14


 


CASH
COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS WITH NON_EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS


 


	
  Annual Retainer*:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Board Members

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  25,000

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman of the
  Board (additional)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  15,000

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee
  Chairperson (additional)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  7,500

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation
  Committee Chairperson (additional)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,000

  	
   

  
	
  Corporate
  Governance and Nominating Committee Chairperson (additional)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  5,000

  	
   

  



 






*  Paid quarterly in
arrears.


 


	
  Meeting Fees:

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Board of
  Directors

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Annual offsite
  regular meeting

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,500

  	
   

  
	
  Regular meeting

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,000

  	
   

  
	
  Special
  (telephonic)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  500

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Audit Committee

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Regular meeting

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,500

  	
   

  
	
  Special (in
  person)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,000

  	
   

  
	
  Special
  (telephonic)

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  750

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Compensation
  Committee

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Regular meeting

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  
	
  Special

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  750

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Corporate
  Governance and Nominating Committee

  	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Regular meeting

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  2,000

  	
   

  
	
  Special

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  750
No. 47338.

#### Protest 32134-K of General Dyestuff Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 24
 
 AMERIPRISE CERTIFICATE COMPANY
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
 City of Minneapolis
 
 State of Minnesota
 
 Each of the undersigned as a director of Ameriprise Certificate Company, a face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, hereby constitutes and appoints Abu M. Arif, Jeffrey J. Scherman, Jason Bartylla, Megan E. Garcy, Christopher O. Petersen and Paul B. Goucher or any one of them, as his or her attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign for him or her in his or her name, place and stead any and all registration statements and amendments thereto (with all exhibits and other documents required or desirable in connection therewith) that may be prepared from time to time in connection with said Company’s existing or future face-amount certificate products - whether pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the Investment Company Act of 1940 or otherwise - and periodic and other reports, and amendments thereto, including those on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K, as required pursuant to provisions of applicable federal securities laws, and any necessary or appropriate filings with states or other jurisdictions, and grants to any or all of them the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act required or necessary or appropriate in connection with such signatures or filings.
 
 Signed on this 4 th day of September, 2019
 
 
 
 /s/ Karen M. Bohn
 Karen M. Bohn
 
 
 
 /s/ Lorna P. Gleason
 Lorna P. Gleason
 
 
 
 /s/ Jean B. Keffeler
 Jean B. Keffeler
 
 
 
 /s Robert McReavy
 Robert McReavy
 
 
 
 #336437
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

-- -- -- --

NO. 16-0563

YAN BENJAMIN WILHELM

ASSOUN

v.

ANAIS AMBER GUSTAFSON

(A/K/A ANAIS AMBER ASSOUN)

AND JOHN CHARLES

GUSTAFSON, JR.

§

§

§

§

§

§

Collin County,

5th District.

June 23, 2017

Petitioner's petition for review, filed herein in the above numbered and styled case,

having been duly considered, is ordered, and hereby is, denied.



I, BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, Clerk of the Supreme Court of Texas, do hereby certify

that the above is a true and correct copy of the orders of the Supreme Court of Texas in the case

numbered and styled as above, as the same appear of record in the minutes of said Court under

the date shown.

It is further ordered that petitioner, YAN BENJAMIN WILHELM ASSOUN, pay all

costs incurred on this petition.

WITNESS my hand and seal of the Supreme Court of Texas, at the City of Austin, this

the 3rd day of August, 2017.

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

By Monica Zamarripa, Deputy Clerk

FILE COPY