alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 67844.

#### Advance Pet Supply Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 62/17197, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic feeders or fountains similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67011, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 48479.

#### Protests 952624-G, etc., of W. A. Bebenek et al. (Buffalo, etc.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 64839.

#### Max Eckardt & Sons Ornament Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 59/16078 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Christmas tree ornaments the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 61868, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4150 

To amend the Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections 

Act to extend bankruptcy eligibility requirements for an additional 2- 

year period. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 17, 2024 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. GRASSLEY, 

Mr. COONS, and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Bankruptcy Threshold Adjustment and Technical Corrections Act to extend bankruptcy eligibility requirements for an additional 2-year period. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bankruptcy Threshold 

5 Adjustment Extension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY PROVISIONS. 

7 Section 2(i)(1) of the Bankruptcy Threshold Adjust8 ment and Technical Corrections Act (Public Law 117– 

9 151; 136 Stat. 1300) is amended, in the matter preceding 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4150 IS

1 subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘2 years’’ and inserting ‘‘4 

2 years’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1

Defendant’s Reply Brief was filed March 16, 2005. Plaintiff’s

Memorandum of Law in Surreply to the Defendant’s Reply Brief was filed 

June 28, 2005

2

42 U.S.C. §§ 2000(e) to 2000(e)-17.

3

29 U.S.C. §§ 621 to 634.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SANDRA K. FRABLE, )

 ) Civil Action

Plaintiff ) No. 05-CV-00402

 )

vs. )

 )

CHRISTMAS CITY HOTEL, LLC, )

trading as )

Radisson Hotel Bethlehem, )

 )

Defendant )

O R D E R

NOW, this 28th day of September, 2005, upon

consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

Complaint, which motion was filed February 4, 2005; upon

consideration of Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to

Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, which response was

filed March 4, 2005; upon consideration of the briefs of the

parties;1 and for the reasons articulated in the accompanying

Opinion, 

IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s motion to dismiss is

granted in part and denied in part.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s motion to

dismiss plaintiff’s claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 19912 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act3 is

granted.

Case 2:05-cv-00402-JKG Document 12 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 2
4

It is the sense of this Order that defendant is free to raise any

additional issues raised in its motion to dismiss and not decided herein

before the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County, Pennsylvania.

-iiIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counts I and II of

plaintiff’s Complaint are dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other respects

defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice.4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is

directed to immediately remand this matter to the Court of Common

Pleas of Northampton County, Pennsylvania.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall

mark this matter closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James Knoll Gardner 

James Knoll Gardner

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00402-JKG Document 12 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN HAWK,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0731 MCE CMK P

vs.

ED ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested a second extension of time to file a second amended

complaint pursuant to the court’s order of April 27, 2005. Good cause appearing, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s June 20, 2005 motion for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint on or before July 22, 2005.

DATED: June 30, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

/bb

hawk0731.36(2) 

Case 2:04-cv-00731-MCE -CMK Document 13 Filed 07/01/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

Case 2:04-cv-00731-MCE -CMK Document 13 Filed 07/01/05 Page 2 of 2
1

 2

 4

 5

 6

 7

 8

 9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

KING HALL CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC

CARTER C. WHITE, CSB #164149

U.C. Davis School of Law

One Shields Avenue, Bldg. TB-30

Davis, CA 95616-8821

(530) 752-5440

Fax (530) 752-5788

Attorney for Plaintiff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOE RAYMOND CASTILLO,

Plaintiff,

vs.

CALIFORNIA YOUTH AUTHORITY, 

et al., 

Defendants.

____________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NO. CIV S-04-0737-GEB-GGH-P

ORDER ON 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL 

On this day came on to be considered the parties’ stipulation of dismissal of Orest Wesely,

M.D. (also referred to in the First Amended Complaint as “Crest” Wesely) as Defendant in the

above entitled action, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and

E.D. Cal. Local Rule 83-143, and the Court, having reviewed the stipulation, does hereby

ORDER, that pursuant to Rule 41, the Plaintiff’s action against Defendant Wesely is

dismissed with prejudice, by operation of law.

Dated: 6/19/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

_______________________________ 

United States Magistrate Judge 

 

 

reed936.stip

Case 2:04-cv-00737-GEB-GGH Document 45 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                                         MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
                                          MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.
                                            COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                          COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS (UNAUDITED)
                                                   (dollars in thousands)



                                FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED           FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                        March 28, 2008                      March 30, 2007
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                            CAPITAL TRUST V  FUNDING  V,L.P.   CAPITAL TRUST V  FUNDING  V,L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 15,949           $ 18,657        $ 15,949           $ 18,708
                               ========           ========        ========           ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    15,470             15,949          15,470             15,949
                               --------           --------        --------           --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                  $ 15,470           $ 15,949        $ 15,470           $ 15,949
                               ========           ========        ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17


</TABLE>
(Part 1SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection I) (U.S. Standard General LedgerChart of Accounts) (Account Number) (Normal Balance) (Title)

 (Bulletin No. 2021-20) (I CA - 10) (August 2021)
#### Richard L. BARNES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of WEST VIRGINIA; Fayette County; Danita Young; Southern Regional Jail, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-7194.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 17, 2001.

Richard L. Barnes, pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Richard L. Barnes, a West Virginia inmate, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915A (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. *See Barnes v. West Virginia,*No. CA-99-1039-5 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 15, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Log in to OTCnet Online

To log in to Fiscal Service Single Sign On (OTCnet Online), complete the following steps:

1. Access https://otcnet.for.fiscal.treasury.gov. A page is presented which displays the 

following log in options: PIV/CAC and ID.me, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. OTCnet Log In Screen

2. Select the option that best represents your status and follow the on-screen instructions to 

verify your identity or create an account in SailPoint IIQ. 

PIV/CAC (Government Users/Contractors)

• Select the PIV/CAC button.

• If prompted, select your certificate, and enter your pin.

• If prompted, follow the on-screen instructions to verify your email address.

The first time a PIV/CAC certificate is used to authenticate, the email verification process 

is initiated.

• A web page is displayed prompting you to submit your email address that will be 

associated with your certificate. A verification code is sent to the email address 

specified.

• A web page is displayed to allow you to input the verification code from the email.

Application Tip

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

ID.me for Non-Government Users

• Select the ID.me button.

• Follow the on-screen instructions to sign in with an existing account or create an 

account.

• If prompted, follow the on-screen instructions to verify your identity. 

• Use your work email address to create initially your ID.me identity. It is still 

recommended to add your personal email to your ID.me identity. 

3. When you log in to OTCnet Online for first time you may be alerted that you are not 

permitted to access the application until your agency’s security administrator completes your 

user provisioning in OTCnet as shown in Figure 2. 

4. Once your agency’s security administrator has imported your user identity to OTCnet, and 

assigned endpoints and roles for you, you will be able to access the application. 

Figure 2. First Time Log In Screen

5. To completely log out, close your browser. You will need to reauthenticate next time you 

login to OTCnet.

As a Check Capture Administrator, Check Capture Supervisor, Check Capture 

Lead Operator, Check Capture Operator, Card Operator or Card Administrator, 

when logging in to OTCnet Online and using Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome, the 

OTCnet splash screen does not appear.

Application Tip

Application Tip
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OPTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS,

a California corporation,

NO. CIV. S-04-482 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

MARK FUKUHARA, an individual;

DOUGLAS BURLAND, an individual;

MICHAEL GERKOVICH, an individual;

STEVEN LEACH, an individual;

EDMUND PETERSON, an individual;

DAN SALOMON, an individual; JOE

SILVA, an individual; DALE BRODSKY,

an individual; EYEPICTURES, INC., a

Missouri corporation; JUSTICE

OPTHALMICS, INC., a Tennessee

corporation; ZETA DEVELOPMENT LABS,

INC., a Tennessee corporation; and

JOHNNY JUSTICE, JR., an individual,

Defendants.

 /

The court is in receipt of plaintiff’s notices of dismissal

of defendants Edmund Peterson and Michael Gerkovich. Plaintiff,

however, has failed to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). 

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 130 Filed 07/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, the court will disregard the aforementioned

notices. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: July 22, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 130 Filed 07/25/05 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 21**

**FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATIONSUBSIDIARIES OF THE CORPORATION**

| SUBSIDIARY                                                                                         | JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Fleet National Bank                                                                                | United States                 |
|    Fleet Bank (RI), National Association                                            | United States                 |
|       Fleet Credit Card Holdings, Inc.                               | Delaware                      |
|    Fleet Holding Corp.                                                              | Rhode Island                  |
|       Fleet Capital Corporation                                      | Rhode Island                  |
|          Fleet Leasing Partners I, L.P.               | Rhode Island                  |
|             Fleet Business Credit, LLC | Delaware                      |
|    Fleet RI Holding Corp.                                                           | Rhode Island                  |
|       Fleet Investment Advisors Inc.                                 | New York                      |
|    Boston World Holding Corporation                                                 | Massachusetts                 |
|       Boston Overseas Financial Corporation S.A.                     | Argentina                     |
| Fleet Growth Resources, Inc.                                                                       | Rhode Island                  |
| Quick & Reilly/Fleet Securities, Inc.                                                          | Delaware                      |
| Robertson Stephens Group, Inc.                                                                     | Delaware                      |
| BancBoston Investments Inc.                                                                        | Massachusetts                 |
|    BancBoston Capital, Inc.                                                         | Massachusetts                 |
----

----

I Informácie

Komisia

----

SPOLOČNÝ KATALÓG ODRÔD POĽNOHOSPODÁRSKYCH RASTLINNÝCH DRUHOV

4. dodatok k 24. úplnému vydaniu

(2006/C 167 A/01)

OBSAH

Vysvetlivky

Zoznam poľnohospodárskych druhov

I.   Repy

II.   Kŕmne plodiny

III.   Olejniny a priadne rastliny

IV.   Obilniny

V.   Zemiaky

----

VYSVETLIVKY

----

(1)Ú. v. EÚ C 68 A, 21.3.2006, s. 1. Katalóg naposledy zmenený a doplnený tretím dodatkom (Ú. v. EÚ C 146 A, 22.6.2006, s. 1).

(2)Ú. v. ES L 193, 20.7.2002, s. 1. Smernica naposledy zmenená a doplnená nariadením Európskeho parlamentu a Rady (ES) č. 1829/2003 (Ú. v. EÚ L 268, 18.10.2003, s. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

5.AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA L.

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

27.POA TRIVIALIS L.

31.LUPINUS ALBUS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

33.LUPINUS LUTEUS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

37.ONOBRYCHIS VICIIFOLIA SCOP.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

39.TRIFOLIUM ALEXANDRINUM L.

40.TRIFOLIUM HYBRIDUM L.

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

44.TRIFOLIUM RESUPINATUM L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

53.RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. VAR. OLEIFORMIS PERS.

III

56.BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERNJ ET COSSON

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

59.CANNABIS SATIVA L.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

65.PAPAVER SOMNIFERUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual Report of Interdyne  Company (the  "Company") on
Form  10-KSB  for the  fiscal  year  ending  June 30,  2008,  as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

September 12, 2008

                                        By:  /s/ Sun Tze Whang
                                                Sun Tze Whang
                                                Chief Executive Officer

September 12, 2008

                                        By:  /s/ Kit H. Tan
                                                Kit H. Tan
                                                Chief Financial Officer

                                       17
----

----

I Informācija

Komisija

----

Komisijas paziņojums, īstenojot Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes 2004. gada 31. marta Direktīvu 2004/22/EK par mērinstrumentiem (1)

[Atsauču uz OIML izstrādātajiem normatīvajiem dokumentiem un šo dokumentu pamatprasībām atbilstošo daļu publicēšana (saskaņā ar direktīvas 16. panta 1. punktu)]

(2006/C 269/01)

(Dokuments attiecas uz EEZ)

MI-001:   Ūdens skaitītāji

saistībā ar:

MI-004:   Siltuma skaitītāji

saistībā ar:

MI-005:   Nepārtrauktas darbības un dinamiskā mēraparatūra šķidrumiem, kas nav ūdens,

saistībā ar:

MI-006, II NODAĻA:   Automātiskie svari atsevišķu preču svēršanai

saistībā ar:

MI-006, III NODAĻA:   Automātiskie gravimetriskie iepildes svari

saistībā ar:

MI-006, IV NODAĻA:   Atsevišķu objektu kopsvara noteikšanas iekārtas

saistībā ar:

MI-006, V NODAĻA:   Nepārtrauktas darbības summējošie svari

saistībā ar:

MI-006, VI NODAĻA:   Automātiskie dzelzceļa vagonu svari

saistībā ar:

MI-008, II NODAĻA:   Tilpuma mēri

saistībā ar:

MI-009, II NODAĻA:   Garuma mērlīdzekļi

saistībā ar:

MI-009, III NODAĻA:   Laukuma mērīšanas līdzekļi

saistībā ar:

(Nb: OIML R136-1 attiecas tikai uz ādas laukuma noteikšanu, taču MI 009 neaprobežojas ar ādas mērīšanu.)

MI-009, IV nodaļa:   Daudzdimensionālie mērīšanas līdzekļi

saistībā ar:

MI-010:   Izplūdes gāzu analizatori

saistībā ar:

----

(1)OV L 135, 30.4.2004.

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6688

JEFFREY WESTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN PERRY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee,

and

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION,

Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. J. Michelle Childs, District 

Judge. (4:10-cv-00107-JMC)

Submitted: November 10, 2011 Decided: January 12, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jeffrey Weston, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant 

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Weston seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Weston has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED