alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Bastion Development, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Elliot Bellen, Chief Executive Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.

Date:  November 4, 2011

/s/ Elliot BellenElliot BellenChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
8040.5 09/29/06



# fAA- 2 OlO- 0760



# - Response Dave Loiterer Robert Harkrnan

I ,\:1Lopel. I Regional Aic1ine Association ATA Ajrcraff Owners & Pilots Association 

### Contacts. With whom outside the FM has this proposal been discussed? I 

### Organization Person Con~acted Date I\-:l{ionaiBusiness Aircraft Association Eli Colli
Attachment 005 ----- Process Flow Charts and Notes --- Sites Controlled by Submitter

Material redacted --- Confidential Business Information
----

| 1. | The Amendment No. 3 fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in this Amendment No. 3 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: April 20, 2010 |   | /s/ Sun Tze Whang            |
|----------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                 |   | Sun Tze Whang                |
|                 |   | Chief Executive Officer      |
|                 |   |                         |
|                 |   |                         |
|                 |   | /s/ Kit H. Tan               |
|                 |   | Kit H. Tan                   |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer/     |
|                 |   | Principal Accounting Officer |

----
No. 58506.

protests 204434-K and 213819-K (New York).

#### Lansen-Naeve Corp. and Alfred Schiftan, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the component material of chief value of the sets is papier máché and that, so far as the issue of entireties is concerned, the facts are the same as those involved in Abstracts 26783 and 45502. On the agreed facts and following the decisions cited, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# sec6_rsnc_2021

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSNC - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BAugust 2021
Order entered February 19, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-01205-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E. H., A MINOR CHILD

On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-18908

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal has not been filed. By postcard dated December 30, 

2019, we directed Janet Saavedra, Official Court Reporter for the 254th Judicial District Court, to 

file, within thirty days, the reporter’s record or written verification no hearings were recorded or 

appellant had not requested the reporter’s record. To date, Ms. Saavedra has not complied. 

Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Saavedra to file, no later than March 10, 2020, either the 

reporter’s record or requested verification. 

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Saavedra and the 

parties. 

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3351]



[[Page 8721]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-200-019]


Rockies Express Pipeline LLC; Notice of Compliance Filing

February 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 16, 2007 Rockies Express Pipeline LLC 
(REX) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised 
Volume No. 1, Fifteenth Revised Sheet No. 22, to be effective February 
17, 2007.
    REX stated that a copy of this filing has been served upon all 
parties to this proceeding, REX's customers, the Colorado Public 
Utilities Commission and the Wyoming Public Service Commission.
    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance 
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the 
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will 
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests 
must be filed in accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of 
the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing a protest 
must serve a copy of that document on all the parties to the 
proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu 
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons 
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies 
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First 
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c78182958488a9abaea9a294b2b7b7a8b5b387a1a2b5a4e9a0a8b1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b4f2f1e6f7fbdad8dddad1e7c1c4c4dbc6c0f4d2d1c6d79ad3dbc2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3351 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Before the First Division,

June 17, 1963

No. 67821.

#### Falcon Sales Co. v. United States,

protest 60/31346 (Tampa).

*330Opinion by

Oliver, O.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                      SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                            WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                  FORM 10-Q/A

[X]  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934

                     For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2000

[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

         For the transition period from ____________ to ______________
                       Commission File number 000-26287

                          RAVISENT Technologies Inc.
            (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)


             Delaware                                   23-2763854
             -----------------------------------------------------
 (State or Other Jurisdiction of          (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
                  Incorporation or Organization)

                           One Great Valley Parkway
                          Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355
                          ---------------------------
                   (Address of Principal Executive Offices)
      Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (800) 700-0362

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes     No  X
-------------------------------------------------------

On May 5, 2000, 16,191,022 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock, $.001 par
value, were outstanding.

Purpose of Amendment:

RAVISENT Technologies Inc. files this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report,
Form 10-Q, in order to include the Exhibit 10.31, Commercial Lease, omitted
inadvertently in the original filing of the Quarterly Report, Form 10-Q on May
15, 2000.
                                       1
<PAGE>

  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



May 16, 2000         RAVISENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.


            /s/ Jason C. Liu
                --------------------------
                Jason C. Liu
                Chief Financial Officer
## Alcoa Massena West Plant

**2012 January**  **February March**  **April** Total Roof Vent Fluoride Emissions (lb/Ton Al) 0.89 1.68 0.63 0.81 Total Primary

Control Fluoride Emissions (lb/Ton Al) 0.08 0.12 0.06 0.07 Total Fluoride Emissions (lb/Ton Al) 0.96 1.80 0.69 0.88**May June**  **July August** **September October** **November December** 

0.46 0.77 1.08 1.06 0.96 1.29 0.61 0.83 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.08 0.52 0.85 1.18 1.16 1.05 1.40 0.68 0.92**YTD**

0.92 0.09 1.01

## Reynolds Metals Co. (Alcoa East)

**2012 January**  **February March**  **April** Total Roof Vent Fluoride Emissions (lb/Ton Al) 1.91 2.13 1.88 2.19 Total Primary

Control Fluoride Emissions (lb/Ton Al) 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 Total Fluoride Emissions (lb/Ton Al) 1.98 2.20 1.94 2.26**May June**  **July August** **September October** **November December** 

2.08 1.93 1.69 2.13 2.18 2.21 2.09 2.17 0.07 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.02 0.02 0.02 2.15 2.00 1.76 2.19 2.25 2.23 2.11 2.19**YTD**

2.05 0.06 2.10
AAM-12-305-E May 21, 2012

Exemption No. 10534 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0362

Mr. Robert S. Walker Chief Pilot/Drug Manager CAL-ORE Life Flight, LCC dba DK Air, LCC 202 Dale Rupert Road Cresent City, CA 95331

Dear Mr. Walker:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 25, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of CAL-ORE Life Flight, LCC dba DK Air, LCC (DK Air), for an exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulati ons (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow DK Air, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to DK Air.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby grant CAL- ORE Life Flight, LCC dba DK Air, LCC an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow DK Air which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Employees of DK Air are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the DK Air part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/
James R. Fraser, M.D. Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 8/29/2023 1

Approving a Compressed Special Election 

Chicago Board of Election Commissioners 

v. Illinois State Board of Elections 

(Samuel Der-Yeghiayan, N.D. Ill. 1:09-cv-82) 

Election officials sought the blessing of a federal court to compress 

election deadlines, including those concerning overseas voters, to 

accommodate a special election set for a vacancy in the U.S. House 

of Representatives. The district judge approved an election schedule 

proposed by the parties. 

Topics: Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act 

(UOCAVA); absentee ballots; intervention. 

On January 7, 2009, five days after Rahm Emanuel resigned as a U.S. Representative to become President Obama’s chief of staff, Chicago’s election officials filed a federal complaint in the Northern District of Illinois against the 

state board of elections to obtain the court’s blessing for a time schedule to 

elect Emanuel’s replacement that, among other things, compressed the voting time for overseas voters.1

 The special election was set for April 7 to correspond with an already scheduled local election, with a primary set for March 

3 if necessary.2

Two days later, Judge Samuel Der-Yeghiayan held a status conference 

and ordered the plaintiffs to prepare a proposed order by January 12.3 On 

January 14, the U.S. Justice Department moved to participate as an amicus 

curiae to address matters concerning overseas voters.4 At a January 15 status 

conference, Judge Der-Yeghiayan granted the Justice Department’s motion.5

Also on that day, Judge Der-Yeghiayan approved the proposed election 

schedule.6

1. Complaint, Chi. Bd. of Election Comm’rs v. Ill. State Bd. of Elections, No. 1:09-cv-82 

(N.D. Ill. Jan. 7, 2009), D.E. 1; see 2 Election Dates Set for Emanuel Seat, Chi. Trib., Jan. 6, 

2009, at 11 [hereinafter 2 Election Dates]. 

2. See Complaint, supra note 1, at 1; see 2 Election Dates, supra note 1; see also Dan Mihalopoulos, 26 File for Emanuel’s Congressional Seat, Chi. Trib., Jan. 20, 2009, at 12 (reporting that primary elections would be held because party nominations were contested). 

3. Minutes, Chi. Bd. of Election Comm’rs, No. 1:09-cv-82 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 9, 2009), D.E. 7. 

Judge Der-Yeghiayan retired on February 17, 2018. Federal Judicial Center Biographical 

Directory of Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

4. Motion, Chi. Bd. of Election Comm’rs, No. 1:09-cv-82 (N.D. Ill.Jan. 14, 2009), D.E. 9. 

5. Minutes, id. (Jan. 15, 2009), D.E. 15. 

6. Order, id. (Jan. 15, 2009), D.E. 16; see Robert Timothy Reagan, Overseas Voting: The 

Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act 3–4 (Federal Judicial Center 2016).
<PAGE>



                         NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES

                                   Exhibit 24
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

     Each person whose signature appears below does hereby make,  constitute and
appoint John J.  Bongiorno,  Phyllis E. Cochran and William W. Jones and each of
them  acting  individually,  true and lawful  attorneys-in-fact  and agents with
power to act without the other and with full power of substitution,  to execute,
deliver and file, for and on such person's behalf, and in such person's name and
capacity or capacities as stated below, any amendment,  exhibit or supplement to
the Form 10-K Report making such changes in the report as such  attorney-in-fact
deems appropriate.


                                   SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the  requirements of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, this
report  has  been  signed  below  by the  following  persons  on  behalf  of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

      Signature                     Title                          Date

/s/JOHN J. BONGIORNO       President and Chief Executive      December 22, 1999
---------------------
   John J. Bongiorno       Officer; Director
                           (Principal Executive Officer)

/s/R. WAYNE CAIN           Vice President and Treasurer;      December 22, 1999
---------------------
   R. Wayne Cain           Director
                           (Principal Financial Officer)

/s/PHYLLIS E. COCHRAN      Vice President and Controller;     December 22, 1999
---------------------
   Phyllis E. Cochran      Director
                           (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/JOHN R. HORNE           Director                           December 22, 1999
---------------------
   John R. Horne


/s/THOMAS M. HOUGH         Director                           December 22, 1999
---------------------
   Thomas M. Hough






<PAGE>




                         NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                AND SUBSIDIARIES


                             SIGNATURES (Continued)

       Signature                    Title                          Date


/s/ROBERT C. LANNERT       Director                           December 22, 1999
---------------------
   Robert C. Lannert


/s/MARK SCHWETSCHENAU      Director                           December 22, 1999
---------------------
   Mark Schwetschenau


/s/THOMAS D. SILVER        Director                           December 22, 1999
---------------------
   Thomas D. Silver
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY ESKRIDGE, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0865 LKK GGH P

vs.

A. CORREA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On December 15, 2005, plaintiff filed objections to the magistrate judge’s order

filed December 5, 2005, denying his motion for the appointment of counsel. The court construes

plaintiff’s objections as a request for reconsideration of the December 5, 2005, order. Pursuant

to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

magistrate judge filed December 5, 2005, is affirmed. 

DATED: January 12, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

esk865.850

Case 2:04-cv-00865-LKK -GGH Document 42 Filed 01/12/06 Page 1 of 1
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

46E Restriction for Non-Federal Exceptions

Federal Non-Federal Code domain value E

(Non-Federal exceptions) is restricted. Fund Family 

Pass 0573022

Pass 0573410Pass 0573620

99E USSGL Reimbursable Flag "R" Restriction

The use of some USSGL accounts with

Reimbursable Flag "R" is limited to specific TAS. 

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

CONCATENATED 

TAS 

Pass 438400 045 X4019000

111E

Special and Trust Fund Restriction for Specific USSGL Accounts with Reimbursable Flag "D"

Reporting some USSGL accounts with Reimbursable Flag "D" and Fund Type "ES" or "ET" is restricted to specific Fund Families. 

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER Fund Family 

Pass 426600 0705088

122 Abnormal Balance Validation

Reporting abnormal balances for specific 

USSGL accounts is restricted to TAS approved by OMB. Footnote 7 (Deadline June 2022), Footnote 8 (Deadline Sept 2021), Footnote 9 (Deadline June 2023), Footnote 10 (Deadline June 2023). Reporting abnormal 

balances for some USSGL accounts is restricted to TAS approved by OMB in the GTAS Override Request Exercise. For more information see the Abnormal Budgetary USSGL Account Balances Dashboard (https://go.max.gov/abnormalbalances). Fail

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

DEBIT CREDIT 

INDICATOR

PRIOR YEAR 

ADJUSTMENT 

CODE 

122E Abnormal Balance Validation

Reporting abnormal balances for specific USSGL accounts is restricted to TAS approved by OMB. Footnote 7 (Deadline June 2022), Footnote 8 (Deadline Sept 2021), Footnote 9 (Deadline June 2023), Footnote 10 (Deadline June 2023).

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER Begin End Indicator

REIMBURSABLE 

FLAG INDICATOR

BEA CA

INDIC

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Bulletin No. 2023-02 DRAFT VII VDR - 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0776 LKK EFB P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations. See 42

U.S.C. § 1983. On July 29, 2008, plaintiff filed a motion to compel discovery. Defendants have

not filed an opposition or a notice of no opposition. See L. R. 78-230(m).

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that defendants have 15 days to file either an opposition or

a statement of no opposition to the July 29, 2008, motion to compel. The court does not intend

to extend this time.

Dated: January 7, 2009.

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 139 Filed 01/07/09 Page 1 of 1
No. 54630.

#### Max Schuster *v.*United States,

protests 133104-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.