alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:ACACP Implementation of 2014 Recommendations And Update on 2012 Recommendations, Department of Transportation Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection
<Page>
                                                                   Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Ronald J. Ivans, Chief Financial Officer of the managing
owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the 'Managing Owner'), of
World Monitor Trust II--Series F ('Series F'), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) Series F's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
       26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
       date hereof (the 'Quarterly Report'), fully complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series F.


/s/ Ronald J. Ivans
------------------------------------------------------
Ronald J. Ivans
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner
November 7, 2003
STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, and SHERIFF OF SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA
,

Petitioner s ,

v.

MATHIS & MURPHY, P.A. and ALLIED VETERANS MANAGEMENT GROUP , INC.
, Respondent s

. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIR ST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3216

Opinion filed October 16, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Thomas W. Poul ton of DeBevoise & Poulton, P.A., Winter Park, for Petitioner Sheriff of Seminole County, Florida; David H Margolis , Orlando; and Jacqueline M. Boswell, Miami , for Petitioner State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs

.
Charles P. Pillans, III , and Henr y M. Coxe, III, of Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault, Pillans & Coxe, Jacksonville, for Respondent Mathis & Murphy, P.A.; Curtis S. Fallgatter of Fallgatter & Catlin, P.A., Jacksonville , for Respondent Allied Veterans Management Group

.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is granted. On remand, the Chief Judge

of the Fourth Judicial Circuit shall assign a successor judge.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ.
, CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 31.2


I, James D. Burnham, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of FrontLine Capital
Group;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:    August 19, 2003

                                              /s/  JAMES D. BURNHAM

                                       -------------------------------------
                                                 James D. Burnham
                                       Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                                            (Chief Accounting Officer)


                                       51
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 214 (Friday, November 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 76942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26734]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9029-9]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) Filed 10/24/
2016 Through 10/28/2016
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20160255, Draft, NPS, ND, Knife River Indian Villages National 
Historic Site Archeological Resources Management Plan, Comment Period 
Ends: 01/03/2017, Contact: James Lange 402-661-1900
EIS No. 20160256, Draft Supplement, USACE, MO, Mississippi River 
between the Ohio and Missouri Rivers (Regulating Works), Comment Period 
Ends: 12/19/2016, Contact: Kip Runyon 314-331-8396
EIS No. 20160257, Final, Caltrans, CA, State Route 79 Realignment 
Project: Domenigoni Parkway to Gilman Springs Road, Review Period Ends: 
12/05/2016, Contact: Aaron P. Burton 909-383-2841
EIS No. 20160258, Final, NRC, FL, Combine Licenses (COLs) for Turkey 
Point Nuclear Plant Units 6 and 7, Review Period Ends: 12/05/2016, 
Contact: Alicia Williamson Dickerson 301-415-1878
EIS No. 20160259, Draft, USFS, CO, Upper Monument Creek Landscape 
Restoration, Comment Period Ends: 12/19/2016, Contact: Carin Vadala 
719-636-1602
EIS No. 20160260, Draft, USACE, ND, Mouse River Enhanced Flood 
Protection Project, Comment Period Ends: 12/22/2016, Contact: Derek 
Ingvalson 651-290-5252

    Dated: November 1, 2016.
Karin Leff,
Acting Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal 
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2016-26734 Filed 11-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
No. 64078. protest 59/20683 (New York).

#### The Spiegel Bros. Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the record disclosed that the full amount of duty due had not been paid at the time of protest. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution was denied, and the protest was dismissed *sua sponte*for lack of prosecution.
No. 61790.

#### Marimac Novelty Co. *v.*United States,

protest 310918-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 6 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. (the  "Partnership")
for the  period  ended  June 30, 2009 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Thomas W. Perry,
Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the
General Partner of the Partnership, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ THOMAS W. PERRY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Thomas W. Perry *
                              Title:   Chief Accounting Officer and Controller,
                                       Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: August 14, 2009
----------------------

*  Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2


                      Park City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                            Certification Pursuant To
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Dunlavy, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: October 13, 2005


/s/ William Dunlavy
--------------------------
Chief Financial Officer


                  (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       137,401,716
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   2,565,936
<MORTGAGE>                                  13,058,464
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             164,357,100
<CASH>                                       2,376,981
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                              79,430
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      28,260,113
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             210,489,896
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            155,182,145
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          6,512,362
<POLICY-OTHER>                               1,665,949
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        2,100,363
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,441,797
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,218,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               210,489,896
<PREMIUMS>                                  33,061,376
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         10,815,048
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              57,048
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 142,934
<BENEFITS>                                  17,291,402
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,104,957
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        24,797,462
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                884,585
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (32,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            916,585
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   916,585
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

STIPULATION RE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & DuFRANE LLP 

PETER RUKIN (SBN 178336) 

STEPHANIE DORIA (SBN 196825) 

100 Pine Street 

Suite 725 

San Francisco, CA 94111 

Telephone: (415) 421-1800 

Facsimile: (415) 421-1700 

Attorneys for Plaintiff LANA VALENTE-HOOK 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

LANA VELENTE-HOOK, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

EASTERN PLUMAS HEALTH CARE 

and DOES 1-5, inclusive, 

 Defendants. 

CASE NO.: CIV.S-04-0645 LKK GGH 

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

CONTINUING PRETRIAL 

CONFERENCE 

WHEREAS, the Pretrial Conference in the above-captioned case is set for May 16, 

2005 and trial is set for August 9, 2005; 

WHEREAS, the parties’ separate and joint Pretrial Statements are due on May 2, 

2005 and May 9, 2005; 

WHEREAS, the parties participated in a day-long mediation on April 26, 2004, at 

the conclusion of which the mediator made a mediator’s settlement proposal with a deadline of 

Friday, April 29, 2005 at 5:00 p.m.; 

Case 2:04-cv-00645-LKK -GGH Document 29 Filed 04/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 

-2- 

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

WHEREAS, the parties wish to avoid expending further resources in preparation 

for the Pretrial Conference and trial in the event that the parties are able to settle the case as a 

result of the mediation; 

THE PARTIES STIPULATE AND AGREE that the Pretrial Conference be 

continued for two weeks. 

DATED: April ___, 2005 RUKIN HYLAND DORIA & DuFRANE LLP 

By:/s signature on original 

STEPHANIE A. DORIA 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

LANA VALENTE-HOOK 

DATED: April ___, 2005 MILLSTONE PETERSON & WATTS 

By:/s signature on original 

JEREMY MILLSTONE 

Attorney for Defendant 

EASTERN PLUMAS HEALTH CARE DISTRICT 

ORDER 

The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, hereby determines that 

good cause exists to continue the Pretrial Conference in this matter. The Pretrial conference is 

therefore continued to May 31, 2005 at 3:00 p.m. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 25, 2005 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton

 Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-00645-LKK -GGH Document 29 Filed 04/28/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 52543.

protests 136084-K, etc. (New York).

#### G. de Blanc Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALFREDA JOHNSON-RICHARDSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0736 DFL JFM PS

vs.

EASTERN DISTRICT 

OF CALIFORNIA,

Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. On March 21, 2005, defendant’s motion to dismiss

this action was granted and this action was dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Judgment was entered on the same day. On April 4, 2005, plaintiff filed a motion for new trial

pursuant to Local Rule 59-291. In her April 25, 2005 document entitled “Objection,” plaintiff

appended a declaration in support of her motion for new trial or reversal of judgment in CIV S03-0422 DFL JFM.

Plaintiff appears to seek relief from this court’s order granting defendant’s motion

to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. However, plaintiff has provided no new

evidence in support of her motion. Rather, plaintiff rehashes the basis of her objections raised to

the October 8, 2004 findings and recommendations. In addition, plaintiff continues to attempt to

Case 2:04-cv-00736-DFL -JFM Document 40 Filed 06/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

revisit issues raised in CIV S-03-0422 DFL JFM in the instant action, despite being advised that

entry of judgment in another case does not provide plaintiff with a claim for relief in a new

action. (October 8, 2004 Findings and Recommendations at 2.) Thus, plaintiff has not shown

any grounds which justify relief from the judgment entered in this action. 

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s

April 4, 2005 motion be denied. 

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days

after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written

objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 

“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” The parties are advised that

failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District

Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 

DATED: June 8, 2005. 

1

rich0736.59

Case 2:04-cv-00736-DFL -JFM Document 40 Filed 06/08/05 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS R. ELLINGTON, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0666 DFL KJM P

vs.

E. S. ALAMEIDA, et al., ORDER AND

Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. On May 18,

2005, the court found service of the complaint appropriate for three defendants and sent plaintiff

the necessary forms with direction to return them along with three copies of the amended

complaint for service.

On May 27, 2005, plaintiff filed a request for a temporary restraining order,

averring he is unable to go to the law library to make the copies without a wheelchair. He asks

that prison officials be ordered to provide him with a wheelchair for one day to facilitate his law

library access.

On June 9, 2005, plaintiff filed a second request for a temporary restraining order

and preliminary injunction, arguing that he cannot reach the dining hall, the showers or the law

library without a walker or a wheelchair.

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 25 Filed 06/17/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

There is no indication in the court’s file that plaintiff has attempted to give notice

of his request for injunctive relief to defendants; he also has not explained what efforts he has

made to notify those who are responsible for his medical care, as required by the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a), (b).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s May 27 and June 9, 2005 motions

for temporary restraining orders are denied.

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s June 9, 2005 motion for a

preliminary injunction be denied.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 16, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

elli0666.tro

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 25 Filed 06/17/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 127 (Monday, July 2, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 39319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-16196]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7940]

Determination Under the Foreign Assistance Act and the Department 
of State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Acts

    Pursuant to Section 654(c) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 
as amended (FAA), notice is hereby given that the Deputy Secretary of 
State has made a determination pursuant to Section 620H of the FAA, and 
Section 7021 of the Department of State, Foreign Operations, and 
Related Programs Appropriations, 2012 (Div. I, Pub. L. 112-74), and 
similar provisions in prior-year appropriations acts, and has concluded 
that publication of the determination would be harmful to the national 
security of the United States.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: June 22, 2012.
Vann H. Van Diepen,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-16196 Filed 6-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```