alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 10/26/2023 1

Consent Judgment 

That Circulators of a Ballot Petition 

Do Not Have to Be Eligible to Vote in the Election 

Malone v. Raffensperger 

(Leigh Martin May, N.D. Ga. 1:20-cv-2513) 

Four days after a case was filed, a district judge issued a consent judgment that it was unconstitutional to require circulators of a recall petition to be eligible to vote in the recall election. 

Subject: Recall elections. Topic: Getting on the ballot. 

“This is an action challenging the constitutionality of Georgia’s requirement 

that circulators of a recall petition be registered voters eligible to vote in the 

recall election.”1

 The federal complaint was filed in the Northern District of 

Georgia on June 15, 2020, against Georgia’s secretary of state by three voters 

seeking the recall of a district attorney who oversaw the investigation of the 

fatal shooting by White men of Ahmaud Arbery, an African American man.2

With their complaint, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining 

order.3

On the day that the case was filed, Judge Leigh Martin May set the case for 

hearing on June 24.4

 She added, “The Court will issue a separate order indicating whether this hearing will be held in person or via videoconference.”5

 On 

June 16, Judge May reset the hearing for June 25.6

On June 19, however, Judge May approved a consent judgment on the parties’ agreement that the challenged provision was probably unconstitutional.7

1. Complaint at 1, Malone v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-cv-2513 (N.D. Ga. June 15, 2020), 

D.E. 1. 

2. Complaint, id. See generally Cleve R. Wootson, Jr. & Michael Brice-Saddler, After Arrests 

in Ga. Killing, Many Ask Why It Took So Long, Wash. Post, May 10, 2020, at A1. 

3. Temporary-Restraining-Order Motion, Malone, No. 1:20-cv-2513 (N.D. Ga. June 15, 

2020), D.E. 2. 

4. Order, id. (June 15, 2020), D.E. 5. 

5. Id. 

6. Order, id. (June 16, 2020), D.E. 8. 

7. Consent Judgment, id. (June 19, 2020), D.E. 10; Consent Judgment Motion, id. (June 

19, 2020), D.E. 9.
----

----

I Ανακοινώσεις

Επιτροπή

----

Ισοτιμίες του ευρώ (1)

25 Σεπτεμβρίου 2006

(2006/C 231/01)

1 ευρώ= 

----

(1)

Πηγή: Ισοτιμίες αναφοράς που δημοσιεύονται από την Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα.

----

----

Προηγούμενη γνωστοποίηση συγκέντρωσης

(Υπόθεση COMP/M.4319 — Mondi/Schleipen & Erkens)

(2006/C 231/02)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

----

(1)ΕΕ L 24 της 29.1.2004, σ. 1.

----

----

Προηγούμενη γνωστοποίηση συγκέντρωσης

(Υπόθεση COMP/M.4396 — Apollo Group/TNT Logistics)

Υπόθεση υποψήφια για απλοποιημένη διαδικασία

(2006/C 231/03)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

----

(1)ΕΕ L 24 της 29.1.2004, σ. 1.

(2)ΕΕ C 56 της 5.3.2005, σ. 32.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000

<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      12,269
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                               93,659
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,267)
<INVENTORY>                                 26,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           144,422
<PP&E>                                     306,670
<DEPRECIATION>                            (120,853)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             378,589
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       68,173
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    15,823
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 276,394
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               378,589
<SALES>                                    326,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           326,662
<CGS>                                      219,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              219,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,011
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             39,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                13,053
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         26,503
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                26,503
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.71
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.65







</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT
10.39
 IRWIN COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORPORATION
2005 STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
 1. Grant of Option JOSEPH LaLEGGIA
 2. Exercise of Option
 (a) Right to Exercise
    (b) Method of Exercise




---



##### 



3. Method of Payment
 4. Restrictions on Exercise
 5. Termination of Relationship
 (a) Termination of Employment Due to Death
 (b) Termination
of Employment due to Disability or Retirement
 (c) Resignation or Termination Without Cause
 (d) Termination for Cause
 6. Effect of an Exit Offer
 -2-




---



##### 



Transferability of Option
 8. Term of Option
 9. Adjustment in Capitalization.
 10. Governing Law.
 11. Definitions.
   12. Withholding Tax Obligations
 -3-




---



##### 



IRWIN COMMERCIAL FINANCE CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Thomas D. WashburnThomas W. Washburn, Chairman   Dated:  December 23, 2005
    /s/ Joseph LaLeggiaJOSEPH LaLEGGIA -4-
No. 54623.

#### President Novelty & Jewelry Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 121414-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 78, C. A. D. 401), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
SUMMARY OF EXEMPTION REQUEST

Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (NGSC) seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 CFR 

91.7, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.405, 91.407, 91.409, and 91.417, to operate an Unmanned Aircraft 

System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This 

exemption will permit NGSC to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) in the National Airspace 

System (NAS) for the purpose of demonstrating airborne inactive products in the furtherance of 

business.

BACKGROUND

NGSC has been in the business of developing and producing aviation and aerospace products for over 75 

years. Utilizing a DJI S900 drone as part of a product demonstration is a practical, economical, and safer 

method of demonstrating data-gathering products to our customers.

EQUIPMENT

The DJI S900 Quadcopter has a maximum takeoff weight of 18 pounds, a maximum diagonal span of 51 

inches, and a LiPo battery that provides 18 minutes of hover time. The equipment that will be operated 

by NGSC will be registered in accordance with 49 USC 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 CFR 

Part 47, aircraft Registration, and marked in accordance with 14 CFR Part 45, Identification and 

Registration Marking.

PETITION

In consideration of the size, weight, speed and limited operating area associated with the unmanned 

aircraft and its operation, NGSC’s operation of the DJI S900 Quadcopter meets the conditions of FMRA 

Section 333 and therefore will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance with 14 CFR Part 

21, Subpart H. 
NGSC requests relief from 14 CFR Sections 91.405 thru 91.417, as these sections set forth requirements 

for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. NGSC will maintain the DJI 

S900 in accordance with the manufacture’s User Manual and maintenance requirements. 

NGSC requests relief from 14 CFR Sections 91.7, 91.119, 91.121, and 91.151, as these requirements are 

impractical due to the size of the equipment. NGSC will maintain at least a 20 per cent battery reserve at 

all times.

CONCLUSION

NGSC will operate the DJI S900 under this approval and within the parameters stated on the exemption 

in the associated Conditions and Limitations.
Exhibit 99(i)





Certification of


Randall K. Davis, Chief Executive Officer


of Titanium Holdings Group, Inc.





This certification is provided
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (the Form 10-QSB) for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 of Titanium Holdings Group, Inc. (the Issuer).





I, Randall K. Davis, the Chief Executive Officer of Issuer certify that, to the best of my knowledge:





| | (i) |  | the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (ii) |  | (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated:  November 13, 2002.


/s/  Randall K. DavisRandall K. Davis





Subscribed and sworn to before me


this 13 th day of November, 2002.





/s/  Rachel MoralesName:

Rachel MoralesTitle:

Notary Public





My commission expires: 09/25/2004
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 8/24/2023 1

Order of Names on the Ballot 

Crim v. Tennessee Democratic Party 

(Kevin H. Sharp, M.D. Tenn. 3:12-cv-838) 

A losing primary candidate filed a federal complaint alleging that 

the victor was improperly included on the ballot and improperly 

positioned on the ballot because his name was listed alphabetically 

first. On the next day, after a hearing, the district judge denied the 

plaintiff immediate relief, finding no wrongdoing and also observing that the plaintiff could have challenged the ballot before the 

election. 

Subject: Voting procedures. Topics: Enjoining certification; 

getting on the ballot; laches; equal protection; intervention. 

Thirteen days after the August 2, 2012, Democratic primary for United States 

Senate in Tennessee, losing candidate Larry Crim filed a federal complaint 

against the Democratic Party and the state division of elections alleging that 

winning candidate Mark Clayton was improperly placed on the ballot and he 

received a disproportionate number of votes because his name was listed alphabetically first.1

 The complaint sought a temporary restraining order and 

an emergency hearing.2

 News media reported that Clayton’s victory in the 

primary election was an embarrassment to the party.3

Judge Kevin H. Sharp held a hearing on August 16, the day after the 

complaint was filed.4 He granted Clayton’s motion to intervene.5 Judge Sharp 

also denied Crim immediate relief.6 Crim demonstrated no wrongdoing, and 

he could have challenged the ballot before the election.7

On August 30, Judge Sharp granted Crim a voluntary dismissal.8

1. Complaint, Crim v. Tenn. Democratic Party, No. 3:12-cv-838 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 15, 

2012), D.E. 1. 

2. Id. at 17. 

3. See Richard Locker, Tenn. Democrats Disavow Winner of Senate Primary, Memphis 

Commercial Appeal, Aug. 4, 2012, at 1. 

4. Docket Sheet, Crim, No. 3:12-cv-838 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 15, 2012); see Transcript Excerpt, id. (Aug. 16, 2012, filed Sept. 4, 2012), D.E. 19 (argument by the party’s lawyer). 

5. Order, id. (Aug. 16, 2012), D.E. 8; see Intervention Motion, id. (Aug. 16, 2012), D.E. 6. 

6. Order, id. (Aug. 16, 2012), D.E. 9; see Tom Humphrey, Judge Leaves U.S. Senate Candidate Clayton on Ballot, Knoxville News-Sentinel, Aug. 17, 2012. 

7. See Mark Clayton Victory in Democratic Primary Upheld by Nashville Judge, Nashville 

Tennessean, Aug. 16, 2012 (describing the hearing as “pointed and at times lively”). 

8. Order, Crim, No. 3:12-cv-838 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 30, 2012), D.E. 17.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4135 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4135

       To require broad agreement for changes to sentencing law.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 16, 2024

  Mr. Kennedy (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Cotton, and Mr. 
Rubio) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To require broad agreement for changes to sentencing law.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consensus in Sentencing Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO SENTENCING COMMISSION VOTING REQUIREMENT.

    Section 994(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended, in the 
matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``four'' and inserting 
``5''.
                                 <all>
```
# Data

&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 3/1/18
No. 63061.

#### Dualoy, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/13685, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison. J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 49130.

#### Petition 6330-R of Pan Pacific Importers, Ltd. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was calléd for trial counsel for the Government moved to dismiss same on the ground that it was untimely. The record showed that the petition was not filed within 60 days as required by section 489 and the rules of the court. The petition was therefore dismissed.
EXHIBIT 21
                              IONICS, INCORPORATED

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRAN


                                                State or Other
       Name                           Jurisdiction of Incorporation
       ----                           ------------------------------

Aqua Cool Enterprises, Inc                       Massachusetts
Aqua Design, Inc.*                               California
Aqua Cool France, S.A.+                          France
Elite Chemicals Pty. Ltd.                        Australia
Favourable Trading Ltd.                          Ireland
Fidelity Purewater, Inc.                         California
Fidelity Water Systems, Inc.                     California
Global Water Services, S.A.++                    Panama
Ionics Acapulco, S.A.                            Mexico
Ionics Agar Environmental Ltd.                   Israel
Ionics Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.                    Singapore
Ionics (Bermuda) Ltd.*                           Bermuda
Ionics Caribbean Investors Ltd.                  St. Lucia
Ionics Constructors Trinidad Ltd.                Trinidad and Tobago
Ionics Enersave Engineering Sdn Bhd**            Malaysia
Ionics Foreign Sales Corporation Limited         Jamaica
Ionics France S.A.                               France
Ionics Freshwater Ltd.+++                        Barbados
Ionics Iberica, S.A.                             Spain
Ionics Italba, S.p.A.++++                        Italy
Ionics Korea Inc.                                Delaware
Ionics Life Sciences, Inc.                       New Jersey
Ionics Mega a.s.***                              Czech Republic
Ionics Nederland B.V.                            The Netherlands
Ionics Taiwan, Inc.                              Taiwan
Ionics Ultrapure Water Corporation               California
Ionics (U.K.) Limited                            United Kingdom
Ionics Water Solutions Lda(degree)               Portugal
Ionics Watertec Pty. Ltd.                        Australia
Resources Conservation Co. International         Delaware
Separation Technology, Inc.****                  Minnesota
Sievers Instruments, Inc.                        Colorado

*    The  Registrant,  either  directly,  through Aqua  Design,  Inc. or through
     Ionics (Bermuda) Ltd., wholly owns 13 subsidiary corporations  incorporated
     in various Caribbean  jurisdictions.  These subsidiary corporations own and
     operate,  or operate and  maintain,  desalination  plants for the supply of
     potable water to resorts, hotels and municipalities.

**   Registrant  through  Ionics  Iberica,  S.A.  owns 55% of this entity.  This
     entity has subsidiary operations in Malaysia and China.

***  Registrant owns 80% of this entity.

**** Owns a U.K. subsidiary, SeparaTech Limited.

+    This entity is wholly owned by Ionics  France S.A.

++   This entity is wholly owned by Ionics (U.K.) Ltd.

+++  Registrant  owns 50% of this entity.

++++ This entity owns a 75% interest in Agrinord S.r.1., an Italian  corporation
     in the  waste  treatment  business.  (degree)  Registrant  owns 51% of this
     entity.
19.02
```

                                                                    Exhibit 3

                        NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                               AND SUBSIDIARIES

                   ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS

The following documents of Navistar Financial Corporation are incorporated
herein by reference:

3.1     Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar Financial Corporation
        (as  amended  and  in  effect on December 15, 1987).  Filed on Form 8-K
        dated December 17, 1987.  Commission File No.  001-04146.

3.2     The By-Laws of Navistar Financial  Corporation (as amended February 29,
        1988).  Filed on Form 10-K dated  January  19,  1989.  Commission  File
        No.  001-04146.

3.3     Amendment to the By-Laws of Navistar  Financial  Corporation.  Filed as
        Exhibit  3.1 on Form 10-K dated  December  18,  2003.  Commission  File
        No.  001-04146.
```
## Breadcrumb

-  National Minerals Information Center 

#           The Mineral Industry of Missouri      

      By National Minerals Information Center

-  Home 
-  Commodities 
-  Countries 
-  Materials Flow 
-  US States 
-  NMIC Seminars 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

Statistics and information on the nonfuel mineral commodities produced in Missouri

### Minerals Yearbook Vol. II - Domestic

2018-2019 data for Missouri are summarized in the table on this web page. The 2015 chapter data tables (XLS) and 2014 chapter containing text and data tables in PDF and XLS formats, and other years, are available through the links below.

### Sources of information

Missouri leads in fire clay, lead, lime, montmorillonite, and tripoli production; is a major producer of crushed stone, cement, and zinc. Produces common clay, construction & industrial sand & gravel, copper, dimension stone, gemstones, and silver.

                        - Statistical Summary
                        - Aggregates Data by State, Type, and End Use
                        - Mineral Commodity Summaries
                        - Mineral Industry Surveys
                        - Minerals Yearbook Volume I -- Metals and Minerals
                        - Mineral Yearbook Volume II - Missouri chapters

The following data table gives nonfuel mineral commodity production data for Missouri extracted from Table 5 in the 2019 Minerals Yearbook Statistical Summary

eEstimated. rRevised. NA Not available. XX Not applicable. -- Zero.

1Includes data from the commodity chapters published in the Minerals Yearbook as they were completed and released through January 2023.

2Production as measured by mine shipments, sales, or marketable production (including consumption by producers).

3Data are rounded to no more than three significant digits; may not add to totals shown. Mine output measured as sold or used by producers is primarily shown in the tables, because values can be assigned. Where sold or used data are not available, actual mine output is used as the production measurement and value is estimated average price of the mineral commodity for that year. Data are reported in gross weight unless otherwise specified.

4Withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data.

5Recoverable content of ores and concentrates.

### **Minerals Yearbook Volume II Missouri chapters:**

*Subscribe to receive an email notification when a publication is added to this page*.
                            - Minerals Yearbook:  The Mineral Industry of Missouri   	  PDF Format:     |  1994  |  1995  |  1996  |  1997  |  1998  |  1999  |  2000  |  2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010-2011  |  2012-2013  |  2014  |   	  XLS Format:   	     |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010-2011  |  2012-2013  |  2014  |  2015 tables-only release  | 
                            - Archive   	     |  1932-1993  |

### Contacts

#### Robert M Callaghan

##### Mineral Commodity Specialist - States

National Minerals Information Center

rcallaghan@usgs.gov

703-648-7709
<PAGE>   1

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(4)


                    NOTE EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT


         THIS NOTE EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered
into by and between JILCO INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation ("Payor")
and LEONARD N. ROSS, a California resident ("Payee").

         Payor and Payee do hereby mutually acknowledge and agree that Payor is
presently liable for the indebtedness represented by a certain promissory note
payable to Payee in the original principal amount of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS
($5,000.00) ("Note" herein), which has a present outstanding balance as of the
date hereof of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($5,000.00) plus accrued interest.

         NOW, THEREFORE, FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION IN HAND
RECEIVED, the parties hereto, and each of them, do hereby agree that effective
as of the date hereof, the unpaid principal portion of the Note and all unpaid
accrued interest, if any, shall be all due and payable on December 31, 1991.


         Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to affect the obligation of
Payor regarding the payment of interest accrued on the Note through the date
hereof, or to affect any obligations of Payor under the Note, except as set
forth herein.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, and each of them, have executed
this Agreement as of the 7th day of November, 1989.

                                        JILCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                        a California corporation 


                                        By /s/ Byron Wayne
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Byron Wayne, President

                                          "Payor"



                                          /s/ Leonard M. Ross
                                          -----------------------------------
                                          Leonard M. Ross

                                          "Payee"