alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10049)

#### The Rubber Corp. of Calif. By: Edward S. Zerwekh Company *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 4414; 54337.

(Decided July 14, 1961)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (Ldwwrd N. Glad*of counsel) for tlie plaintiff.

*WilUam S. OrHclc, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Morris Braverman,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in these appeals consists of certain canvas shoe tops exported from Japan during June 1959. The appeals have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> Mb. Glad: * * *

> I offer to stipulate that the merchandise involved herein consists of youth size, boys’ size, and men's size canvas shoe tops, which were exported from Japan during the month of June, 1959.

> I further offer to stipulate that the export value of such merchandise, as defined under the New Value statute which went into effect on February 28, 1958, are as follows:

> For the youth size, 16.75 cents per pair; for the boys’ size, 21.75 cents per pair; and, for the men’s size, 28% cents per pair, net packed.

> Mb. Bbaveeman : From information obtained from Examiner Dresser, who is present in court today, the Government so stipulates.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as follows:

> For the youth size, 16.75 cents per pair; for the boys’ size, 21.75 cents per pair; and, for the men’s size, 28% cents per pair, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Download Firmware

To download firmware, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, click Manage Centralized Deployment >Download 

Release. 

2. From the Application drop-down menu, select Firmware. 

3. Click Next. The Select Firmware for Download page appears.

• Prior to each firmware upgrade, the currently installed firmware version must be 

uninstalled first. 

• Firmware upgrades are operating system (e.g., Windows 11 or Windows 10) and 

scanner (e.g., EC7000i, EC9100i, EC9600i, EC9700i, Panini MyVision X) specific. 

• Each firmware version has a corresponding terminal configuration(s) that it supports 

(by scanner and by operating system). Determine the appropriate firmware upgrade 

by firmware version, scanner, and operating system before downloading.

4. Click the Firmware hyperlink to download the firmware. The Review Firmware Download

page appears.

5. Click Download as shown in Figure 1. The Save Program dialog box appears.

Figure 1. Review Firmware Download

6. Click Save or Cancel. 

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• Click Save to choose the location where you want to save the file. 

• Click Cancel to the OTCnet Check Capture Application Download page without 

saving the file.

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

• Click Return Home to the OTCnet Home 

Application Tips

Additional Buttons
GTAS 2.11 – 

Manual Adjustment by USSGL

USSGL Board Meeting May 10, 2018

1

Manual Adjustments done at the USSGL level as opposed to only supplying the line item information.

Added Line Numbers

Added Text Box for justification.

What’s Changed?

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Manual Adjustments – On Entry (Preparer)

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Manual Adjustments – Edit (Preparer)

Example of Line with the USSGL Breakout for adjustment

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Manual Adjustments – Edit (Preparer)

Example of Line 9.2 (Net Position) & no USSGL Breakout

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Manual Adjustments – Edit (Preparer)

Clicking in the Adjustment Field allows it to be changed:

Clicking ‘enter’ or tabbing off the field saves the adjustment and the save button is enabled:

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Manual Adjustments – Edit (Preparer)

Adjustment is applied after clicking save in the prior examples

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Manual Adjustments – Edit (Preparer)

Available USSGL Accounts for the line available via the Reclassified Balance Sheet’s Configuration

Selecting a USSGL Account enables the ‘Add USSGL’ button

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Manual Adjustments – Edit (Preparer)

Adding a USSGL Account is placed at the bottom of the table.  The Preparer can apply the Adjustment amount on this line; if added by mistake, the Preparer can click the ‘remove’ button.

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Manual Adjustments – Edit (Preparer)

Example of a ‘removed’ USSGL Account; after clicking ‘save’, the USSGL Account will be permanently removed.

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

# image2.png

# image1.png

# image8.png

# image9.png

# image10.png

# image11.png

# image12.png

# image13.png

# image14.png

# image15.png

# image16.png

# image17.png
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUSANNE H. LINN, ET. AL. : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, ET. AL. : NO. 2002-4417

O R D E R

AND NOW, this ____ day of November, 2002, it is Ordered

that defendant AFSCME Local 2549's motion, docket entry #5, to

dismiss is RESOLVED as stated on the record of November 5, 2002.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Judge

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies faxed on ___________to: Copies mailed on __________to:

Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 10 Filed 12/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
----

Order of the Court of 1 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling of Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch (Netherlands)) — V.O.F. Dressuurstal Jespers v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Zuidwest/kantoor Breda van de rijksbelastingdienst

(Case C-233/05) (1)

(Sixth VAT Directive - Supplies under a contract to make up work - Concept of 'good produced' - Training of a horse - Whether or not tax is chargeable)

(2006/C 224/28)

Language of the case: Dutch

National court

Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch

Parties

Applicant: V.O.F. Dressuurstal Jespers

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Zuidwest/kantoor Breda van de rijksbelastingdienst

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Gerechtshof te 's-Hertogenbosch — Interpretation of Article 5(7)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member State relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Horse that has not been broken trained to make it suitable for a specific use — Horse trained for use as a riding horse capable, following training, of participating in competitions at a higher level — In both cases: new good produced? — Importance of a change which can be measured objectively in the horse and the attainment or non-attainment of the objective — Tax paid according to periodic declarations

Operative part of the order

----

(1)OJ C 205 of 20.8.2005.

----
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 7/19/2023 1

Last-Minute Challenge to a Debate Exclusion 

Barr v. Saddleback Valley Community Church 

(David O. Carter, C.D. Cal. 8:08-cv-927) 

A federal complaint alleged that incumbent school-board candidates, and not other candidates, were improperly allowed to appear 

before school-district staff meetings. Just over two weeks later, the 

district judge denied the plaintiffs immediate relief on a finding that 

the school board had not conspired to advance the incumbents’ 

candidacies. The incumbents were defeated in the election. 

Subject: Campaign activities. Topics: Early voting; intervention; 

equal protection. 

At 3:43 p.m. on Friday, August 15, 2008, Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party’s 

candidate for President, filed a complaint in the Central District of California’s Santa Ana courthouse against the Saddleback Valley Community 

Church, alleging that a program scheduled by the church for the following 

afternoon would include Democratic and Republican presidential candidates 

but would exclude Barr without applying well-established objective criteria.1

With their complaint, Barr and his vice presidential candidate filed an ex 

parte application for a preliminary injunction.2

Judge David O. Carter denied immediate relief on the day that the action 

was filed.3 “Plaintiffs have known about the pendency of this event since at 

least July . . . .”4 Noting that “[a]n ex parte Motion resides on the fringes of 

due process,” Judge Carter observed that the late filing suggested hubris and 

that the plaintiffs were “manipulating the ex parte procedure rather than suffering an actual emergency.”5

 In addition, the action made a weak showing of 

merit.6

1. Complaint, Barr v. Saddleback Valley Cmty. Church, No. 8:08-cv-927 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 

15, 2008), D.E. 1; see Maeve Reston & Seema Mehta, Chi. Trib., At Megachurch, Candidates 

Talk of Personal Faith, June 17, 2008, at 22 (describing the event). 

2. Ex Parte Application, Barr, No. 8:08-cv-927 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2008), D.E. 6; Preliminary Injunction Motion, id. (Aug. 15, 2008), D.E. 3. 

3. Opinion, id. (Aug. 15, 2008), D.E. 7. 

4. Id. at 3. 

5. Id.

6. Id. at 3–4.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                                             165,181
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       85,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   250,280
<PP&E>                                             126,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     376,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              190,935
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              1
<COMMON>                                             1,378
<OTHER-SE>                                         183,969
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       376,283
<SALES>                                            122,518
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   122,518
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      599,621
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (477,103)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (477,103)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (477,103)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.07)


</TABLE>
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 7/13/2023 1

Enjoining a Referendum on a Property Transfer 

Petitioners Alliance v. City Council 

(Sharon Lovelace Blackburn, N.D. Ala. 2:01-cv-497) 

On the day before a special election, five voters filed a federal complaint seeking to enjoin transfer of assets in frustration of a ballot 

question, which was a referendum on the city’s transfer of assets to 

a water-and-sewer board. The judge denied immediate injunctive 

relief and, in time, granted the defendants a dismissal because the 

plaintiffs had not alleged infringement of the right to vote. 

Subject: Ballot measures. Topic: Ballot measure. 

On the day before a February 27, 2001, special election in Birmingham, Alabama, following unsuccessful litigation in state courts, five voters filed a federal complaint in the Northern District of Alabama seeking to enjoin transfer 

of assets in frustration of a ballot question, which was a referendum on the 

city’s transfer of assets to a water-and-sewer board.1

 (The board had transferred the assets to the city in 1998.2

) With their complaint, the voters filed a 

motion for a temporary restraining order.3

Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn denied the plaintiffs immediate injunctive relief that same day.4

 On the following day, citizens voted to overturn the 

transfer.5

On March 15, 2002, Judge Blackburn granted the defendants a dismissal 

because the plaintiffs had not alleged infringement of the right to vote.6

1. Complaint, Petitioners Alliance v. City Council, No. 2:01-cv-497 (N.D. Ala. Feb. 26, 

2001), D.E. 1. 

2. Opinion at 2, id. (Mar. 15, 2002), D.E. 8; see Chris Scribner, Underlying Referendum Issue: Kincaid vs. Council, Birmingham News, Jan. 16, 2001, at 1. 

3. Temporary-Restraining-Order Motion, Petitioners Alliance, No. 2:01-cv-497 (N.D. 

Ala. Feb. 26, 2001), D.E. 2. 

4. Order, id. (Feb. 26, 2001), D.E. 3; see Chris Scribner, Election On, Doesn’t Count “Irrelevant” Vote, Birmingham News, Feb. 27, 2001, at 1. 

5. Opinion, supra note 2, at 4; see Chris Scribner & Benjamin Niolet, Vote Goes Big for 

Referendum, Birmingham News, Feb. 28, 2001, at 1 (reporting a vote of 13,923 to 3,340). 

6. Opinion, supra note 2.
No. 64110.

protest 140734-K/12986 (New Orleans).

#### W. A. Taylor & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that che merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration 

                    By Notice dated November 8, 2006 and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on November 17, 2006, (71 FR 66974), Kenco VPI, Division of Kenco Group Inc., 350 Corporate Place, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37419, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Nabilone (7379), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                 

The company plans to import the listed controlled substance for distribution to its customers. 

No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the registration of Kenco VPI to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated Kenco VPI to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 952(a) and 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed. 

Dated: February 16, 2007. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration.

 [FR Doc. E7-3298 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4074 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to approve interstate commerce carrier apprenticeship programs 

for purposes of veterans educational assistance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 8, 2024 

Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. CASSIDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs to approve interstate commerce carrier apprenticeship programs for purposes of 

veterans educational assistance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans’ Transition 

5 to Trucking Act of 2024’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4074 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

2 AFFAIRS TO APPROVE INTERSTATE COM3 MERCE CARRIER APPRENTICESHIP PRO4 GRAMS FOR PURPOSES OF VETERANS EDU5 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE. 

6 Section 3672(c)(1) of title 38, United States Code, 

7 is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub9 paragraph (C); 

10 (2) in subparagraph (A), in the matter before 

11 clause (i), by striking ‘‘The State’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the 

13 State’’; and 

14 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol15 lowing new subparagraph (B): 

16 ‘‘(B) The Secretary may act in the role of a State 

17 approving agency for purposes of approval of a multi-State 

18 apprenticeship program.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
---

FROM WELFARE TO WORK:
SERVING AMERICA'S VETERANS

April 1997In response to President Clinton's call for federal agencies to identify
employment opportunities for persons on welfare, the Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) has identified more than 400 potential employment opportunities
for fiscal year 1997 at VA facilities across the nation. The President's
challenge offers VA the opportunity to link its primary mission of serving
the nation's veterans with the welfare-to-work initiative by focusing on
veterans who are welfare recipients and their families.
VA's Compensated Work Therapy (CWT) and Vocational Rehabilitation &
Counseling (VR&C) Programs are already successful in moving veterans
from dependency to self-sufficiency by providing job training and vocational
rehabilitation. In fiscal year 1996, the CWT Program helped 2,900 veterans
become self-sufficient and competitively employed. VA has identified 2,000
veterans who are receiving both some form of welfare assistance and VA services
under the VR&C Program, which prepare veterans to enter the competitive
job market.

VA's Welfare-to-Work Plan:

- Encourages facilities to appoint local Welfare-to-Work
  Program Coordinators.
- Provides guidance on recruitment, networking,
  employee assistance and employee development.
- Permits VA facilities to restructure positions
  and to use a wide variety of appointing authorities.
- Encourages facilities to recruit graduates of
  the CWT and VR&C Programs.
- Encourages contractors to hire welfare recipients
  and VA grantees to participate in this initiative.
- Encourages VA facilities to host state welfare
  recipients in training and work experience programs.

Secretary of Veterans Affairs Jesse Brown is committed
to supporting the welfare-to-work initiative. Secretary Brown will:

- Send a memorandum to all VA leaders, managers
  and front-line supervisors expressing his personal commitment to the program
  and his expectation that they will work with local community resources
  to develop opportunities to recruit and retrain welfare recipients.
- Issue messages about the program on employee
  Earnings & Leave Statements and through the Secretary's Daily Broadcast
  Message, which is received at every VA facility.
- Include articles about the Welfare-to-Work Plan
  implementation and its successes in Vanguard, VA's official employee publication.

###



|[Home button] VA
Home Page | Putting Customers FirstCompliments, Questions,
Complaints, and Concerns | Table of ContentsTable
of Contents
|--------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | -----------------------------------
New BETCs for Loan Activity 

FY 2020 

Missy Williams

May 9, 2019

Schedule of Changes in Cash Balance

For use in the Schedules of the General Fund – Schedule 2 

Statements of Changes in Cash Balance

For use in the U.S Financial Report – Budgetary Statements 

Schedule of Changes in Cash Balance Vs. the Statements of Changes in Cash Balance

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

2

Statements of Changes in Cash Balance from Budget and Other Activities 

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

3

Statements of Changes in Cash Balance from Budget and Other Activities 

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

4

BETC Proposal

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

5

Questions? 

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

Primary Contact

	Missy D. Williams

	Supervisory Accountant

	(304) 480-7125

	Melissa.Williams@fiscal.treasury.gov

Secondary Contact

	D. Lynn Petty

	Accountant

	(304) 480-7404

	Deborah.Petty@fiscal.treasury.gov

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Contact Information

Page ‹#›

# image1.png

# image3.png

# image8.png

# image9.png

# image10.png

# image11.png

# image12.png