alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Reset Your Own Multi-Factor Authentication Status

To reset your own multi-factor authentication status, complete the following steps:

1. On the Offline Application login page, select Retrieve Admin Profile. 

2. The system retrieves your user profile and prompts you to change your offline password. 

3. Change your offline password. 

4. The system updates your offline password and initialization file and saves your profile and 

login credentials. 

5. The system will prompt you to set up multi-factor authentication (MFA).

6. If you have already set up MFA, you will be prompted to input your one-time code. 

7. If you have not set up the MFA, the system prompts you to set up MFA with your chosen 

authenticator application by downloading the application on your workstation device. 

8. Follow the steps in the authenticator to set up MFA. The system displays the authenticator 

secret and instructs you to enter it into your chosen authenticator as shown in Figure 1. 

9. Input the authenticator secret into your authenticator application and label it as “OTCnet 

Offline.” 

10. Enter your Time-Based One-Time Password (TOTP) code generated by the authenticator 

into the textbox and select OK.

Figure 1: Prompt for Multi-Factor Authentication Setup

User must ensure they have selected TOTP as their authenticator option with SHA1 and 

an OTP code length of six characters. Not all authenticators will present this option, but 

if it is an option, these parameters should be selected.

11. If you enter correctly the TOTP code, system will display a message that you have 

successfully set up multi-factor authentication for OTCnet Offline. Select the OK button to 

proceed to the login page as shown in Figure 2. Otherwise, system will prompt you to verify 

your MFA setup and TOTP code and try again. 

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 2: Successful Multi-Factor Authentication Setup Message

12. The system completes user authentication and displays a message informing you that MFA

has been successfully set up. 

13. Acknowledge the message. The system logs you out and displays the OTCnet Offline login 

screen.
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- USSGL
- Meeting Materials & Bylaws
- USSGL IRC Meeting September 18, 2014

# U.S. Government Standard General Ledger Issues Resolution Committee (IRC) Handouts

## September 18, 2014, USSGL IRC Meeting Handouts

- Summary of Changes Bulletin 2014    PDF File  |  Excel File
- Reappropriations - Budgetary Resources Transferred Out Due to a Reappropriation Effective Fiscal Year 2010
- Railroad Retirement Board Lost Investment Opportunity (Indefinite Budget Authority) Effective Fiscal Year 2014
- Part 1 Section 3 for Fiscal 2014              Proposed Changes for D104 & A418   PDF File  |  Word File
- Part 1 Section 5 for Fiscal 2014              Statement of Budgetary Resources   PDF File  |  Excel File                 SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources   PDF File  |  Excel File                 Budget Program and Financing (P&F) Schedule    PDF File  |  Excel File 
- FMS 2108 Yearend Closing Statement    PDF File  |  Excel File 
- Part 1 Section 7 for Fiscal 2014              Validation Detail   PDF File  |  Excel File
- Part 3 Section 5 for Fiscal 2014              SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources   PDF File  |  Excel File                 Statement of Budgetary Resources   PDF File  |  Excel File 

Last modified 08/22/18
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHILES OFFSHORE LLC CONTAINED IN THE ACCOMPANYING
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             862
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,895
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,848
<PP&E>                                         175,236
<DEPRECIATION>                                     284
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 182,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,807
<BONDS>                                        110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      63,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   182,209
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   527
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      402
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    193
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       193
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:04-cv-0776 TLN EFB P

ORDER

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 

U.S.C. § 1983. The pretrial order in this action issued on March 6, 2015. ECF No. 275. Because 

Plaintiff had not complied with this court’s prior orders instructing him to file motions to obtain 

the appearance of his incarcerated witnesses accompanied by affidavits, the Court provided 

Plaintiff with additional time to file such motions. Id. at 12. Plaintiff has now filed two motions 

to obtain the appearance of dozens of incarcerated witnesses. ECF Nos. 282, 284. Plaintiff also 

asks that the Court allow many, if not all, of these witnesses to appear remotely. ECF Nos. 282, 

283, 284. Lastly, Plaintiff asks that he himself be allowed to participate in the trial remotely, via 

videoconference. ECF No. 278.

A preliminary review of Plaintiff’s witness motions reveals that the proposed incarcerated 

witnesses will testify generally to their experiences during the institutional lockdown that is the 

subject of this litigation. The presentation of the number of witnesses proposed by Plaintiff to all 

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 285 Filed 06/02/15 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

testify on the same general facts would be an undue waste of time and needlessly present 

cumulative evidence to the jury. Fed. R. Evid. 403. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motions to obtain 

the appearance of incarcerated witnesses (ECF Nos. 282, 284) are denied without prejudice. 

Within 14 days of the date of this order, Plaintiff shall submit a motion to obtain the attendance of 

incarcerated witnesses limited to five incarcerated witnesses.

Plaintiff’s motions for an order permitting the video or telephonic appearance at trial by 

himself and his witnesses (ECF Nos. 278, 283) are also denied. The Court will issue the 

necessary writ to ensure Plaintiff’s appearance at trial, along with any writs necessary to ensure 

the appearance of Plaintiff’s five incarcerated witnesses (upon receipt of a proper motion and 

affidavits to obtain their appearance).

So ordered.

Dated: June 2, 2015

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 285 Filed 06/02/15 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2

Certification

I, Patrick L. Alesia, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Griffon Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
December 11, 2008

By:

/s/ PATRICK L. ALESIAPatrick L. Alesia Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
No. 60041.

#### Remington Rand, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 241579-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of wooden containers of typewriters which constitute the usual and ordinary containers of typewriters and are not suitable for any other use. On the record presented and following *United States*v. *American Railway Express Co.*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 211, T. D. 38968), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Page 1 of 1 IRC Handout 12/1/2021 

Proposed Account Definition Changes to Distinguish Contingent Liabilities 

From EDL/Cleanup Cost Liabilities 

Account Title: Contingent Liabilities 

Account Number: 292000 

Normal Balance: Credit 

Definition: This account is used to record the amount of liability recognized as a result of past 

events or exchange transactions in which where a future outflow or other sacrifice of resources is 

both probable and measurable. Pending/threatened litigation and unasserted claims, administrative 

or judicial proceedings, lawsuits, and/or other legal actions filed against a federal entity that could 

ultimately result in settlements or decisions adverse to the federal government should be reported 

in this account. This account does not close at year-end. Record a Contingent liabilities related to 

environmental cleanup costs rather than legal actions are reported in USSGL 299500, "Estimated 

Cleanup Cost Liability." Record the Estimated losses arising from adverse events expected during a 

coverage period of Exchange Transaction Insurance Programs Other Than Life Insurance are 

reported in USSGL 266000, "Actuarial Liabilities for Federal Insurance and Guarantee Programs." 

Account Title: Estimated Cleanup Cost Liability 

Account Number: 299500 

Normal Balance: Credit 

Definition: This account is used to record the estimated amount of liability for projected future 

cleanup costs (not yet due and payable) directly related to the storage and disposal of hazardous 

material as well as the operations and closures of facilities at which environmental contamination 

may be present. Cleanup costs arise from the removal, storage, and/or disposal of (1) hazardous 

waste from property, or (2) material and/or property consisting of hazardous waste, at permanent 

or temporary closure or shutdown of the associated property, plant, and equipment. Estimated 

cleanup costs that are part of pending/threatened litigation, unasserted claims, administrative or 

judicial proceedings, lawsuits, and/or other legal actions are reported in USSGL 292000, 

“Contingent Liabilities”. This account does not close at year-end.
June 5, 1956

No. 60023.

#### Compania Mexicana de Aviacion, S. A. *v.*United States,

protest 259294-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Before the First Division,

April 14, 1954

No. 57996.

protests 809880-G, 871337-G, and 917176-G (New York).

#### Natt Weinstock, Inc. *v*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Reject a Deposit

To reject a deposit, complete the following steps:

1. From the Deposit Processing tab, click View Deposits. The View Deposits page displays. 

To locate deposits, you can also select Search Deposits and click the Voucher 

Number of the deposit you would like to continue processing.

2. From the Select Display drop-down menu, select My Deposits in Process.

3. Click the Voucher Number of the deposit you would like to continue processing. 

The View Submitted Deposit page displays, as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Reject Deposit

4. Click Reject. The Step 1 of 2: Define Information for Deposit Rejection displays.

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Deposit Total is not displayed on the Define Information for Deposit Rejection page for 

a foreign check deposit with Other selected for the country of deposit.

5. Enter Comments describing the reason you are rejecting the deposit, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Enter Rejection Comments

6. Click Next. The Step 2 of 2: Review Information for Deposit Rejection page displays.

Deposit Total is not displayed on the Review Information for Deposit Rejection page for 

a foreign check deposit with Other selected for the country of deposit.

7. If the information is correct, click Submit. Click Edit to modify the comment. 

8. A Confirmation page displays stating that the deposit is rejected.

Application Tip

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• Click Adjust to adjust a deposit.

• Click Cancel to return to the OTCnet Home Page. No data is saved. 

• Click Confirm to confirm a deposit. 

• Click View Voucher Event Log to view the history of the deposit voucher.

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

• Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

Additional Buttons
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 00-2779

___________ Vishnue L. Jennings, * * Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the District * of Nebraska. Kellogg USA, Inc.; American * Federation of Grain Millers, Local * [UNPUBLISHED] #50, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: June 7, 2001 Filed: June 12, 2001

___________ Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Vishnue L. Jennings appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in Jennings's employment discrimination action. After de novo review of the record and a thorough review of the parties' submissions, see LaCroix v. Sears, Roebuck, & Co. , 240 F.3d 688, 690 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review), we conclude summaryjudgment for defendants was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.-2-

A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 23

- 00346

- CV

HECTOR SANCHEZ

v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, ET AL.
On Appeal from the 36th District Court of Bee County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. B

- 22

- 1419

- CV

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered thi s cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and th e case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 50% against appellant and 50 % against a ppell ee s

. However , no cost s are assessed against appel lant , as appellant filed an affidavi t of inab ility to pay
costs. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 2, 2024
Letter of Undertaking



 Exhibit 10.9 
 To: Beijing Champion Hi-Tech Co., Ltd.  
 Date: February 13, 2008 
 I refer to the Technical Support and Consulting Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) entered into by and between us as of the date of May 1, 2004. According to Article 8 of the Agreement, I, Beijing
Champion Distance Education Technology Co., Ltd., will provide you financial support at your request (the “Request”) in the manners as permitted by law. 
 I hereby further undertake irrevocably that: 
 I shall provide financial support to you in any case of loss regardless of the Request made or not.

 Yours Faithfully, 
 Beijing Champion Distance Education
Technology Co., Ltd. 
  

			
	Name:	 	  

	Title:
CERTIFICATION   Exhibit 31.2

I, Robert Knoth, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of Form 10-KSB/A of IEH Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;


4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
     report is being prepared;

     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
     business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially effected, or is
     reasonably likely to materially effect, the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function);

     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
     to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
     internal controls over financial reporting; and

Date: May 4, 2005
      -----------

/s/ Robert Knoth
----------------
Robert Knoth
Chief Financial Officer, Controller and
Principal Accounting Officer




                                       15
No. 52257.

protests 130047-K, etc. (Boston, etc.).

#### Dolliff & McGrath et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Case 2:02-cv-04388-JF Document 2 Filed 07/26/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 53519.

protest 58770-K (Boston).

#### Oxford University Press, N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Swanson, Brian (OST) h6T-(>cr--iq^?'2?-ft5 

From: VanDerBellen, Alexander [sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com] , !|^'^Q:-;j'^iy|n',! 

Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 2:12 PM :. r r'r'~p^"^',' " 

To: ' • . • Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) ' " ' '- ' ^"^ • 

Cc: Adams, Kevin (OST) ^ , . .., 

Subject: FW: EAS Proposaljamestown and Devils Lake. North Dakota •'<> o /\ U- 32 

Dennis, Brian 

The communities both support our request for an extension. Jamestown below and I will forward Devils Lake by separate 

email 

Thanks for your help and understanding. 

-Sascha 

From: Matthew Leitner fmailtoijmsairDortOidaktel.coml 

Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 11:58 AM 

To: Hedden, Stephen A 

Cc: VanDerBellen, Alexander; Davidman, JelT; Loeffelholz, Mary; Morgan, JelT; Jim Boyd 

Subject: RE: EAS Proposal Jamestown and Devils Lake, North Dakota 

Good Afternoon Stephen, 

It was a pleasure to talk to you as well. Please let this email serve as confirmation that JMS has no objections with 

respect to the EAS service proposal submission deadline being extended to August 1, 2011. 

Respectfully, 

Matthew J. Leilner 

Manager 

Jamestown Regional Airport 

PC Box 1560 

Jamestown, NO 58402-1560 

(701) 252-6466 (phone) 

(701) 252-2919 (fa\) 

Aiipori Information 

Delta Connection offers daily schedulefl services to and from the World via Minneapolis, Minnesota. 

Convenient and FREE parking is available near ttie airport terminal! 

This communication may contain confidential and/or proprietary inlormation and may not be disclosed to anyone other than the intended addressee. Any other disclosure is strictly prohibited by law. 

If you are not the intended addressee, you have received tfiis communication in error. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy the communicatwn including all content and any 

attachments. Thanh you. 
From: Hedden, Stephen A rmailto:Stephen.A.Hedden(iQ)delta.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 10:20 AM 

To; 'Jamestown Regional Airport' 

Cc: VanDerBellen, Alexander; Davidman, Jeff; Loeffelholz, Mary; Morgan, Jeff 

Subject: RE: EAS Proposal Jamestown and Devils Lake, North Dakota 

Matthew, 

It was good to talk to you. 

Regarding the EAS service proposals for Jamestown and Devils Lake that are due tomorrow, April 6, Delta has 

approached the DOT about extending the submission deadline to Aug 1. The DOT was agreeable, but wants to make 

sure the communities are OK with this. Since the new contract period would not begin until Oct 1, this would still allow the 

DOT two months to review bids and receive comments before the end of the current contract period. Please let me know 

if this is agreeable with JMS. 

Thanks, 

Steve Hedden 

Delta Air Lines 

Network Management 

404-773-0311