alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David K. Spohr, Vice President and Director of Fund Administration of the Managing Owner, Preferred
Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust  Series B (Series B), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                 
|/s/ David K. Spohr                                                               
|David K. Spohr Vice President and Director of Fund
Administration August 14, 2006
OSWER/OSRTI

Washington, DC 20460

NATIONAL PRIORITIES LIST (NPL) 

***Proposed Site*** May 2013 

GARDEN CITY GROUND WATER Garden City, Indiana 

PLUME Bartholomew County 

 Site Location:

The Garden City Ground Water Plume is located in the unincorporated town of Garden City in Bartholomew County, 

Indiana, approximately one mile south of the city of Columbus. Garden City is in the flood plain of the east fork of the 

White River. The Garden City Ground Water Plume has affected residential and commercial drinking water wells and 

covers approximately 3.4 acres. 

 Site History:

Since 1990, drinking water wells in Garden City have had intermittent trichloroethene (TCE) contamination, which 

has sometimes exceeded drinking water standards. Despite several investigations in the area, the origin of the TCE is 

unknown. 

 Site Contamination/Contaminants:

The ground water plume consists of TCE. 

 Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment:

The town includes approximately 50 i ndividual residences and a mobile home park. Garden City residential wells 

obtain drinking water from one common aquifer. All the residences, mobile homes and businesses in Garden City that 

are served by private ground water wells may be affected by the TCE plume. 

 Response Activities (to date):

The Indiana Department of Environmental Management supplies and maintains carbon filtration systems on t hree 

residential wells. Attempts to establish a water line main system in Garden City have not been financially feasible. 

 Need for NPL Listing:

The state of Indiana referred the site to the EPA because the site requires a long-term response and action and listing 

will allow for a proper and timely investigation of the nature and extent of contamination. Other federal and state 

cleanup programs were evaluated, but are not viable at this time. The EPA received a letter of support for placing the 

site on the NPL from the state of Indiana. 

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may 

change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination. See 56 FR 5600, February 11, 1991, or subsequent 

FR notices.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to 

these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs can be found on 

the Internet at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaqs/index.asp or by telephone at 1-888-42-ATSDR or 1-888-422-8737.
[ARTICLE] 5
[CIK] 0000051200
[NAME] GREAT DANE HOLDINGS INC.
[MULTIPLIER] 1,000
<TABLE>
<S>                             <C>
[PERIOD-TYPE]                   12-MOS
[FISCAL-YEAR-END]                          DEC-31-1995
[PERIOD-END]                               DEC-31-1995
[CASH]                                          41,086
[SECURITIES]                                         0
[RECEIVABLES]                                  102,702
[ALLOWANCES]                                     1,564
[INVENTORY]                                     84,686
[CURRENT-ASSETS]                               253,484
[PP&E]                                         239,865
[DEPRECIATION]                                 116,001
[TOTAL-ASSETS]                                 570,605
[CURRENT-LIABILITIES]                          187,931
[BONDS]                                        276,918
[COMMON]                                             1
[PREFERRED-MANDATORY]                                0
[PREFERRED]                                          0
[OTHER-SE]                                    (88,060)
[TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY]                   570,605
[SALES]                                      1,203,369
[TOTAL-REVENUES]                             1,292,574
[CGS]                                        1,048,825
[TOTAL-COSTS]                                1,113,649
[OTHER-EXPENSES]                                     0
[LOSS-PROVISION]                                     0
[INTEREST-EXPENSE]                              42,311
[INCOME-PRETAX]                                 59,302
[INCOME-TAX]                                    23,305
[INCOME-CONTINUING]                             34,997
[DISCONTINUED]                                       0
[EXTRAORDINARY]                                      0
[CHANGES]                                            0
[NET-INCOME]                                    34,997
[EPS-PRIMARY]                               34,997.000
[EPS-DILUTED]                               34,997.000
</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Request for

Second Extension of Time to Serve Responses to Discovery Requests

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. FLYNN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

CONSTANCE L. PICCIANO (SBN 66172)

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

Post Office Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 322-6453

Facsimile: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendants

Ramos, McKee, Lea, Gauthreaux, Johnson, 

Mathews, Chastain, Wheeler, Cade and Mini

SA2005100283

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN A. MARTIN,

Plaintiff,

v.

L. VILES, et al.,

Defendants.

No. CIV S-04-0756 LKK JFM P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR

SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO

SERVE RESPONSES TO

INTERROGATORIES,

ADMISSIONS, AND REQUEST FOR

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

The Court, having considered defendants’ request for an extension of time to serve

responses to plaintiff’s interrogatories and requests for admissions, and good cause having been

found:

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00756-LKK -JFM Document 33 Filed 08/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Granting Request for

Second Extension of Time to Serve Responses to Discovery Requests

2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendants shall be granted a second extension of

time, to and including September 9, 2005, to complete and serve defendants’ responses to

admissions and interrogatories.

DATED: August 25, 2005.

/mart0756.ext2

Case 2:04-cv-00756-LKK -JFM Document 33 Filed 08/26/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Interstate Power and Light Company (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Chief Financial Officer

 

March 1, 2006
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v THOMAS ROUNTREE, Jr., Airman First Class, U. S. Air Force, Appellant

21 USCMA 62, 44 CMR 116

No. 24,277

August 20, 1971

*Colonel Bertram Jacobson*and *Lieutenant Colonel Norman L. Paul*were on the pleadings for the Appellant, Accused.

*Colonel James M. Bumgarner*and *Captain Bruce D. Viles*were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Chief Judge:

The general court-martial convening order in this case designated Colonel Seymour Abrams as the military judge. Appellant Rountree requested in writing that his trial be by military judge alone. An amendment to the original court-martial order substituted the name of Colonel Carl Abrams as the military judge, but the accused did not execute a new request in writing to be tried by Colonel Carl Abrams. Instead, Colonel Carl Abrams, after satisfying himself that Rountree understood the significance of a request for trial by a military judge alone, struck the name Seymour from the request in writing Rountree had executed and inserted his first name.

Under Article 16, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 816, before requesting trial by a military judge alone an accused must know the identity of the judge who is to function. When the military judge who functions is different from the one named in an accused’s request to be tried by military judge alone, the accused must execute a new request in order to meet the jurisdictional prerequisite of Article 16. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

Despite Rountree’s indication after trial that he was satisfied with the trial that occurred we reverse the decision of the Court of Military Review and set aside the findings of guilty and the sentence. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Air Force. Another trial may be ordered.

Senior Judge FERGUSON concurs.

Quinn, Judge

(dissenting):

The meager indication in the trial record as to the accused’s knowledge of the actual identity of the trial judge *63might have required further inquiry. See United States v DuBay, 17 USCMA 147, 37 CMR 411 (1967). However, defense affidavits have clarified the matter, and as the record now stands there is no doubt as to the accused’s understanding. The situation here, therefore, is similar to that in United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 62 (1970). For the reasons set out in my dissent there, I dissent here.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                        OF AMERICAN BANKNOTE CORPORATION


     This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, and
accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the year ended
December 31, 2002 of American Banknote Corporation (the "Company").

          I, Steven G. Singer, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
  certify that to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





         Dated:  March 31, 2003.



                                                         /s/ STEVEN G. SINGER
                                                        ----------------------
                                                        Name: Steven G. Singer
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements and related prospectuses of Ingles Markets,Incorporated listed below of our reports dated November 26, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Ingles Markets, Incorporated, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of InglesMarkets, Incorporated included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended September 27, 2008: 

 

(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-52103) pertaining to the Ingles Markets, Incorporated Investment/Profit Sharing Plan andin the related Prospectus, 

 

(2) RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-88310) pertaining to the Ingles Markets, Incorporated Amended and Restated 1997 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan and in the related Prospectus, and 

 

(3) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-74459) pertaining to the Ingles Markets, IncorporatedInvestment and Profit Sharing Plan and in the related Prospectus. 

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Greenville,South Carolina 

November 26, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          37,938                       0
<SECURITIES>                                     1,044                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,332                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       409                       0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,540                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                65,930                       0
<PP&E>                                           4,121                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,170                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  86,139                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,718                       0
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            17                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,028                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    86,139                       0
<SALES>                                         10,556                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,556                       0
<CGS>                                            5,984                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,808                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,214)                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,022)                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        38                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,060)                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,060)                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.81)                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.81)                       0


</TABLE>
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Resetting a User Password

To reset a user password, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, select User Administration>Manage Users. The Step 1 of 2 

Select a User page appears.

2. Select the user profile radio button for the password you want to reset. 

3. Click Reset Password as shown in Figure 1. The Step 2 of 2 Review User Profile for 

Password Reset page appears. 

Figure 1. Step 1 of 2: Select User Profile

4. Verify the following user’s profile password should be reset and click Submit. A 

Confirmation page appears presenting the user profile’s temporary password.

• You can only reset one user password at a time.

• Communicate the User ID and temporary password and provide it to the appropriate 

user. The User ID is the same as the one used to access OTC Online.

• Click Return to View User Profile List to return to the View User Profile List for that 

terminal.

• Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

Application Tips

Additional Buttons
No. 56403.

protests 69112-K (A), etc. (San Francisco).

#### The American Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

MEETING OF NAIMA WITH ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Hilton Garden Inn Thursday, December 6, 2012

Kansas City, Kansas 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM (Central)

.....................................................................................................................

AGENDA

1. Review of NAIMA’s Antitrust Guidelines – A. Crane (Attachment)

2. Introductions

3. Meeting Overview

4. Presentation On Furnace Types

a. Discussion On Chrome Content of Refractories

b. Graphics Illustrate Why Hex Chrome Emissions Are Limited To Only One Furnace 

Type

c. Temperature of Furnace Is Relevant Factor 

• Reference To Dr. Brosnan

5. Modeling & Remodeling Results

a. Majority of Furnaces Do Not Meet Risk Threshold

b. Remodeling Results Show Even Greater Reduction In Number of Furnaces With 

Relevant Risk

c. Remainder Could Be Addressed Through Recommendations Set Forth In NAIMA’s 

Proposal

6. Presentation of NAIMA’s Proposal

7. Discussion With EPA About Timing

8. Next Steps

9. Adjournment
Order entered October 2, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00593

- CV

BROOKE ARMBRISTER, Appellant

V.

AMERICAN HONDA FINAN CIAL CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appea l from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 00400



### O RDER

Before the Court are appellee’s October 1, 2019 motion for extension of time to file its

brief and appellant’s October 2, 2019 re sponse. We GRANT the m otion and ORDER

appellee’s brief be filed no later than October 21, 2019

.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
<PAGE>


                        AMERIPRISE CERTIFICATE COMPANY
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

City of Minneapolis

State of Minnesota

The undersigned as a director and officer of Ameriprise Certificate Company, a
face-amount certificate company registered under the Investment Company Act of
1940, hereby constitutes and appoints Brian J. McGrane, David K. Stewart,
Scott R. Plummer, and Christopher O. Petersen or any one of them, as his
attorney-in-fact and agent, to sign for him in his name, place and stead any
and all registration statements and amendments thereto (with all exhibits and
other documents required or desirable in connection therewith) that may be
prepared from time to time in connection with said Company's existing or
future face-amount certificate products - whether pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Act of 1933, the Investment Company Act of 1940 or otherwise
- and periodic reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K required pursuant
to provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any necessary or
appropriate filings with states or other jurisdictions, and grants to any or
all of them the full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
required or necessary or appropriate in connection with such signatures or
filings.

Signed on this 1st day of August, 2006
               ---







/s/ William F. (Ted) Truscott
-----------------------------
    William F. (Ted) Truscott
No. 46104.

#### Protests 979218-G, etc., of Daniels *&*Fisher Stores Co. et al. (Denver, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Substitution of Counsel Case no. CIV 04-0627 FCD GGH

1

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN, ESQ., CSBN 107403

WISEMAN LAW GROUP, P.C.

 1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106

 Davis, California 95616

 Telephone: 530.759.0700

 Facsimile: 530.759.0800

Attorney for Defendant

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

BENITO JULIAN LUNA,

 

 Petitioner,

v.

SCOTT KERNAN

 Respondent.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No. CIV 04-0627 FCD GGH

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL

Notice is hereby given that, subject to the approval of the court, BENITO JULIAN 

LUNA, petitioner in the above-entitled matter, and pursuant to Rule 83.182(g) of the 

Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 

accepts and substitutes appointed counsel, Barry Morris, CSBN 48368, 1220 Oakland 

Blvd., Suite 200, Walnut Creek, CA 94596, for JOSEPH J. WISEMAN as attorney of 

record in the above-captioned case. 

The Office of the Federal Defender consulted with Mr. Morris regarding the 

above-captioned case and recommends that Mr. Morris be appointed. 

Case 2:04-cv-00627-MCE-GGH Document 23 Filed 09/13/11 Page 1 of 2
Substitution of Counsel Case no. CIV 04-0627 FCD GGH

2

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 Due to the need for new counsel to submit a Status Report by August 14, 2011, 

this Substitution is being filed without petitioner’s signature. Petitioner has been 

advised, however, that new counsel will be appointed to represent him and a 

Substitution of Counsel form has been sent to him for signature.

Dated: August 5, 2011 Respectfully submitted,

I accept the above substitution. 

By: /s/ Joseph J. Wiseman 

JOSEPH J. WISEMAN

Attorney for Defendant 

BENITO JULIAN LUNA

I accept the above substitution. 

Dated: August 5, 2011 By:__________________ 

BENITO JULIAN LUNA

 Substitution sent to Petitioner for 

Original Signature on file

I accept the above substitution.

Dated: August 5, 2011 BARRY L. MORRIS

By: /s/ Barry L Morris

BARRY L. MORRIS

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 12, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

________________________________

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00627-MCE-GGH Document 23 Filed 09/13/11 Page 2 of 2