alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 66310.

#### American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/2129(B)-15206, etc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cutback asphalt the same in all material respects as that the subject of *American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 2188), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the annual report of Furniture Brands International, Inc.(the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, W. G. Holliman, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ W. G. Holliman, Jr.             
| | ------------------------------------
| | W. G. Holliman                      
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer      
| | Furniture Brands International, Inc.
| | March 11, 2005
From: Khan, Mohammed 

Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:26 PM 

Subject: DOE Publication of Notice of Public Mtg and Availability of PreTSD

Dear Interested Parties: 

 

I would like to inform you that today the U.S. Department of Energy published in the 

Federal Register its notice of public meeting and availability of a preliminary technical 

support document for Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Water Heaters, 

Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool Heaters. Additionally, I would like to inform you 

that the preliminary TSD and other material that are referenced and indicated in the 

notice to be available on the DOE website will soon be available at the below URL. 

Please also note in order to allow for an open discussion and receive comments relevant 

to this standards activity, the U.S. Department of Energy scheduled a public meeting 

which will be held on February 9, 2009, from 9 AM to 5 PM at the U.S. Department of 

Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 1E-245, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, 

Washington, DC 20585. 

 

Please feel free to contact me if you require additional information.

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/water_po

ol_heaters_nopm.html

Mohammed Khan

Building Technologies Program

(202) 586-7892 voice

(202) 586-4617 fax

EE-2006-STD-0129 and EERE-2006-BT-STD-0129 COMMENT 31.2
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 26-2 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 1 of 4

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 26 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 26-2 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 26-2 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 26-2 Filed 05/12/2006 Page 4 of 4
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN TIMOTHY GREGORY,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. RAMIREZ, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:04-CV-0764-FCD-DAD-P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS'

REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO EXCHANGE

TRIAL EXHIBITS

ORDER

Defendants’ request for an extension of time to exchange trial exhibits was considered

by this Court, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties have until 30 days from the date of this

order within which to exchange trial exhibits.

DATED: September 15, 2006.

DAD:4

greg764.exhEot

Case 2:04-cv-00764-FCD-DAD Document 61 Filed 09/15/06 Page 1 of 1
No. 50961.

#### Protests 121548-K, etc., of A. N. Deringer, Inc. (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Ktncheloe, J.

It -was stipulated that the merchandise consists of a paper-covered periodical entitled “Franciscan Studies” which is published jointly by members of the Order of St. Francis of the Roman Catholic Church in the United States and other countries, including Canada; that it is printed in Canada and issued to its subscribers in Canada and the United States at regular quarterly periods; and that the said periodica] is devoted to current literature in the fields of religion, philosophy, theology, etc., and carries book reviews of current publications in these fields. As the stipulated facts seemed to meet all the requirements for classification of the merchandise under said paragraph 1726, as periodicals, the protests were sustained.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 33

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 60 Att. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 3 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 4 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 5 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 6 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 7 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 8 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 9 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 10 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 11 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 12 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 13 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 14 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 15 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 16 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 17 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 18 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 19 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 20 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 21 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 22 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 23 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 24 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 25 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 26 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 27 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 28 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 29 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 30 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 31 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 32 of 33
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-6 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 33 of 33
No. 43983.

#### Protests 220988-G, etc., of American Express Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EASTERN DIVISION

STEVEN ANTHONY GUZMAN,

Petitioner,

v.

A. LAMARQUE, Warden,

Respondent.

CIV-S-04-0700 FCD GGH P

ORDER

Respondent has requested an extension of time to file a response to the second

amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. Good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Respondent Lamarque is granted an extension of

time of twenty-two days up to and including March 23, 2006, to complete and file the response to

Petitioner’s second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.

Dated: 3/3/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

__________________________________

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

guzm0700.po

Case 2:04-cv-00700-FCD-GGH Document 22 Filed 03/03/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,852
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,892
<ALLOWANCES>                                       906
<INVENTORY>                                        360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,146
<PP&E>                                           8,885
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,324
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,661
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,714
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           141
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,661
<SALES>                                          3,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 7,460
<CGS>                                              314
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,591
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,515
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,406)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,406)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,406)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.17)
        

</TABLE>
No. 50953.

#### Protests 14193-K, etc., of S. H. Kresge Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the •court dismissed the protests.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 39 (Wednesday, February 28, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 9080]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3421]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Delaware, North Carolina, South Carolina, New Jersey, 
Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia and the District of 
Columbia)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. 
ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inez E. De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227, or 
954-423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. ET via a telephone conference 
call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, 
please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write Inez E. De Jesus, 
TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, Plantation, FL 
33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to 
participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with 
Inez E. De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7977, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include the following: Various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 20, 2007.
John Fay,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. E7-3421 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 10.10
                            FIRST AMENDMENT
                                TO THE
                      COMPENSATION DEFERRAL PLAN
                           FOR EXECUTIVES OF
                  INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION
             (Amended and Restated as of September 17, 1993)


     The Compensation Deferral Plan for Executives of International 
Multifoods Corporation (Amended and Restated as of September 17, 1993) 
is amended as follows:

                                   I

     Section 3.7 is added effective January 1, 1997, to read as follows:

3.7     Notwithstanding any contrary provision of the Plan, no 
additional deferrals shall be allowed under the Plan on or after January 
1, 1997, by any current Participant, and no new Participants shall be 
added to the Plan on or after January 1, 1997.

                                  II

     Section 4.5 is amended effective January 1, 1997, to read as 
follows:

4.5     The Account Balance of each Participant shall be credited as of 
the last day of each calendar quarter with interest at a rate equal to 
one-fourth of the annual rate reported for such date (or the next 
preceding business day) in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release as 
the yield on U.S. Treasury Bills with a constant maturity of 10 years.  
Such interest shall be credited based on the Account Balance as of the 
first day of the calendar quarter, reduced by any withdrawals or 
distributions made from the Account during the calendar quarter.
EXHIBIT 10.20
 AMENDMENT ONE TO THE IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN FOR
 [NAMED EXECUTIVE]
         1.12
    
    Supplemental Benefit means, to the extent vested and to the extent
that such amounts have not been forfeited pursuant to Section Two below, the
excess, if any, of (i) the accrued benefit which would have been payable to, or
with respect to, a Participant under the Pension Plan if the amount of such
accrued benefit were calculated without giving effect to the




---



##### 



limitations on compensation and benefits under Code Sections 415 and
401(a)(17), and (ii) the Participants Regular Benefit; provided however,
that no Supplemental Benefit shall accrue after January 31, 2009.
   IRWIN FINANCIAL CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/[SIGNED BY/TITLE] ATTEST:/s/[ATTESTED BY/TITLE] -2-




---



##### 



Exhibit ______
  NAMED EXECUTIVE:  DATE SIGNED:  SIGNED BY/TITLE:  ATTESTED BY/TITLE:
 NAMED EXECUTIVE:  DATE SIGNED:  SIGNED BY/TITLE:  ATTESTED BY/TITLE:
 NAMED EXECUTIVE:  DATE SIGNED:  SIGNED BY/TITLE:  ATTESTED BY/TITLE:
 NAMED EXECUTIVE:  DATE SIGNED:  SIGNED BY/TITLE:  ATTESTED BY/TITLE:
 -3-
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VANCE EDWARD JOHNSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0776 LKK EFB P

vs.

D. L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel suing for alleged civil rights violations under 42

U.S.C. § 1983. The matter is currently before the court on plaintiff’s on June 14, 2007, motion

styled, “Notice and Motion to Compel Disclosure/Discovery Info. In re. R. Kelly” seeking an

order to compel discovery pursuant to Rules 26(a) and 37(a)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure. He requests an order directing D. L. Runnels or counsel for defendants to produce

information which would enable him to locate R. Kelly for service of process. For the reasons

explained, the motion is denied.

On January 18, 2007, the court directed that process be served on defendant R. Kelly. On

February16, 2007, process was returned unexecuted with the notation that there was “no R.

Kelly in CDC database. Need more info.” Docket # 73. On February 26, 2007, the court

instructed plaintiff that he must provide more information about this defendant so that he could

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 96 Filed 07/17/07 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

be located and served, and that if he was unreasonably denied the information or delayed in

obtaining it, he could request this court’s assistance. Docket # 74. He submits evidence that he

has written to D. L. Runnels and counsel for defendants asking that they provide information so

that he may effect service of process on R. Kelly. Counsel opposes the request on three grounds:

(1) since defendants have yet to answer the complaint, discovery is premature; (2) the automatic

discovery provisions do not apply in this action; and in any event, (3) counsel has determined

that R. Kelly no longer is employed by the California Department of Corrections and

Rehabilitations (CDCR). 

Rule 26(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applies only to parties to an action. 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a). Neither D. L. Runnels nor counsel for the defendants are parties to this

action. Furthermore, the automatic disclosure provisions of Rule 26 do not apply in “an action

brought without counsel by a person in custody of the United States, a state, or a state

subdivision.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(E)(iv). Plaintiff is in the custody of the State of California

and proceeds without counsel. 

Finally, plaintiff has not submitted any evidence that defendants have unreasonably

denied or delayed access to information about R. Kelly’s whereabouts. Instead, counsel for

defendants has contacted the CDCR and determined that R. Kelly no longer works for that

agency. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that plaintiff’s June 14, 2007, motion is denied.

Dated: July 16, 2007.

Case 2:04-cv-00776-TLN-EFB Document 96 Filed 07/17/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 64801.

#### Theodore W. Svensson *v.*United States,

protests 59/12409 and 59/12410 (Duluth).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by entries 156, 178, 183, 188, and 180 was crude petroleum, testing under 25 degrees A.P.I., the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said entries. The protests having been abandoned as to entries 167, 169, 170, 173, and 174, to that extent, the protests were dismissed.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4317 — Aviva/De Agostini/Sopaf/Bipielle Net)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 193/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust--Series B
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               1051823
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust--Series B
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-26-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos

<CASH>                          15,415,131

<SECURITIES>                    359,975

<RECEIVABLES>                   59,395

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                15,834,501

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  15,834,501

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           191,177

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      15,643,324

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    15,834,501

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                789,847

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                369,734

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    420,113

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   3.58

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
No. 58938.

protest 242980-K (New York).

#### Chivas Brothers Import Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas L. Carter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Thomas L. Carter

Thomas L. Carter
Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and will be retained by
Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1





                                                                      EXHIBIT 23




                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on
Form S-3 (File No. 2-77062), and Forms S-8 (File Nos. 2-77060, 2-91694, 33-43955
and 33-48287) of our reports dated February 18, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedule of
Instron Corporation as of December 31, 1998, and 1997, and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1998, which reports are included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.




                                                /s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
July 22, 1999