alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bulletin No. 2020-21

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to Bulletin No. 2020-15, U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) —

A Treasury Financial Manual (TFM) Supplement

1. Purpose: This bulletin notifies agencies that Parts 1 and 2 of the USSGL

Supplement have been revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 and FY 2021.

2. Summary of Changes: The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made

to the USSGL.

3. Changes by Part/Section/File:

Part 1-FY2020 Reporting changes to files in Sections III, V, VI, and VII:

Section III: Account Transactions

Transactions

Transaction Listing

T-Accounts

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2020 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

Optional (2020) Balance Sheet

Statement of Net Cost

Statement of Budgetary Resources

SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary

Resources and Budget Program and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2020 Reporting

Reclassified Balance Sheet

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2020 Reporting

Validations Detail

Validations Summary

Edits Detail

Page 1 of 3
Edits Summary

Part 2—FY 2021 Reporting changes to files in Sections I, II, III, IV, V, VI,

and VII:

Section I: Chart of Accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

Transactions

Transaction Listing

T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary

Account Reporting

USSGL Attribute Definition Report

USSGL Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2021 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

Balance Sheet

Statement of Net Cost

Statement of Budgetary Resources

SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary

Resources and Budget Program and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2021 Reporting

Reclassified Balance Sheet

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2021 Reporting

Validations Detail

Validations Summary

Edits Detail

Edits Summary

4. Effective Date:

Part 1 requirements for FY 2020 are effective immediately.

Part 2 requirements for FY 2021 are effective October 1, 2020.

5. Inquiries:

Page 2 of 3
Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board

representative or:

Jaime M. Saling

Director, Financial Reports and Advisory Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Telephone: 304-480-6485

Fax: 304-480-5176

Date: August 5, 2020

Page 3 of 3
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1410

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM033AD

2000-29-024 --- 11/18/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE ESTATE OF PERRY 

BREWINGTON : CIVIL ACTION

 v. :

 

JOSEPH LOMBARDO, et al. : NO. 05-6016 

M E M O R A N D U M O R D E R

AND NOW, this 29th day of September, 2010, upon consideration of plaintiff’s

Motion For a New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 59(a) and 60(b) (the

“Motion”) (Doc. No. 75), and defendants’ response thereto (Doc. No. 76), it is hereby

O R D E R E D

that the motion is DENIED.

Plaintiff relies exclusively on Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(3) in support of the Motion. 

Rule 60(b)(3) provides that the court may relieve a party from a final judgment for fraud,

misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party. A motion for relief from a judgment

under Rule 60(b) is “addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court.” Wagner v.

Pennsylvania R.R. Co., 282 F.2d 392, 397 (3d Cir. 1960). A party seeking relief under Rule

60(b)(3) on the ground that the opposing party engaged in fraud, misrepresentation, or other

misconduct must prove fraud by clear and convincing evidence. Simons v. Gorsuch, 715 F.2d

1248, 1253 (7 Cir. 1983); Total Containment, Inc. v. Environ Products, Inc., 1996 WL 239877, th

at *2 (E.D. Pa. May 6, 1996). 

Plaintiff has failed to show by clear and convincing evidence that defendants

engaged in fraud or misrepresentation. Plaintiff claims that there are inconsistencies between
defendants’ deposition testimony taken during discovery and their testimony at trial. Plaintiff

alleges that the officers testified during discovery that if the Protection From Abuse Order (“PFA

Order”) required the officers to confiscate a weapon from a suspect, they would be required to do

so. At trial, the evidence showed that the PFA Order issued in this case only required the

defendant to “relinquish the firearm” to the Sheriff of Philadelphia County. There was no

explicit order from the court to the police officers to seize the firearm. Accordingly, this court

finds that defendants did not make any misrepresentations or commit a fraud upon the court.1

Therefore, the court cannot disturb the verdict of the jury, and the Motion must be DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Thomas J. Rueter 

THOMAS J. RUETER

Chief United States Magistrate Judge 

Plaintiff presented evidence and argument regarding this alleged inconsistency to 1

the jury. The jury returned a verdict in defendants’ favor.

2
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Administrative Reports: Vouchers in Progress

To view a voucher in progress report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, click Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Administration Reports, click View Vouchers In Progress. The View Vouchers in 

Progress page appears.

The Vouchers In Progress page only displays non-archived deposits or adjustments with 

a voucher date that is five years or less from to the current date.

3. Click the Voucher # hyperlink to view the Voucher Event Log page and additional voucher 

information. The View Voucher Event Log page appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: In Progress View Voucher Event Log Page

The View Voucher Event presents additional information about the voucher and the 

history of the voucher events through the Financial Institution (FI) System To System 

Interface.

Application Tip

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

4. Click the Voucher # hyperlink to view the details of the deposit or adjustment. The Voucher 

Details Information page or the View Adjustment Details page appears.

Or

Click a Voucher Event State hyperlink to view the voucher event details. The Voucher 

Event Details page appears as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: In Progress Voucher Event Details Report Output

The Voucher Event Details page presents processing errors associated with the voucher 

event and additional information about the voucher and the transmission associated with 

the voucher events through the FI System To System Interface, and the Collections 

Information Repository (CIR) interface.

• Click Cancel to return to the OTCnet Home Page. No data is saved. 

• Click Clear to clear all data fields and reset to the default selections.

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

• Click Refresh to redisplay the page with any additional vouchers that 

are in-process.

• Click Return Home to return to the previous page.

Application Tip

Additional Buttons
----

List of customs offices empowered to handle formalities for the exportation of cultural goods, published in accordance with Article 5(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3911/92 (1)

(2006/C 187/03)

----

(1)OJ L 395, 31.12.1992, p. 1.

----
No. 53999.

#### Michaels, Stern & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 67835-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was' stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-16	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/17/22
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

The undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of American BankNote Holographics, Inc. (the “Company”), that the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and the results ofoperations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

 
|        | By: /s/ Mark J. Bonney                                 |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Mark J. Bonney                                         |
|   | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer  and |
|   | Chief Accounting Officer                               |

 

Date: May 15,2006

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, orother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting thesignature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of thiswritten statement required by Section 906, has been provided to AmericanBank Note Holographics, Inc. and will be retained by American Bank NoteHolographics, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.

 

----
No. 57973.

protests 507215-G, etc. (New York).

#### A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of moufflons or goatskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57768, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
No. 54001.

#### C. J. Osborn Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 55756-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
18.08 Manage a Classification
**Exhibit 10.3**

**INTERNATIONAL  ALUMINUM CORPORATION**

**NON-EMPLOYEE  DIRECTOR COMPENSATION**

Effective July 1,2005
| BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEES                           |   |   |      |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------|
| Quarterly Retainer –  Chairman               |   | $      | 37,500.00 |   |
| Quarterly Retainer                                |   | $      | 7,000.00  |   |
| Meeting Fees – Chairman                      |   | $      | 0.00      |   |
| Meeting Fees                                      |   | $      | 500.00    |   |
|                                              |   |   |      |
| COMMITTEE FEES                                    |   |   |      |
| Audit Committee  Quarterly Retainer – Chair  |   | $      | 3,000.00  |   |
| Audit Committee  Quarterly Retainer – Member |   | $      | 2,000.00  |   |
| Meeting Fees – Chair                         |   | $      | 1,000.00  |   |
| Meeting Fees – Member                        |   | $      | 500.00    |   |

 

Effective July 1,2006
| BOARD OF DIRECTORS FEES                           |   |   |      |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|-----------|
| Quarterly Retainer –  Chairman               |   | $      | 37,500.00 |   |
| Quarterly Retainer                                |   | $      | 7,000.00  |   |
| Meeting Fees – Chairman                      |   | $      | 0.00      |   |
| Meeting Fees                                      |   | $      | 1,000.00  |   |
|                                              |   |   |      |
| COMMITTEE FEES                                    |   |   |      |
| Audit Committee  Quarterly Retainer – Chair  |   | $      | 5,000.00  |   |
| Audit Committee  Quarterly Retainer – Member |   | $      | 2,000.00  |   |
| Meeting Fees – Chair                         |   | $      | 1,500.00  |   |
| Meeting Fees – Member                        |   | $      | 1,000.00  |   |

 

1

----
# Main

# Footnotes and Additional Inf.
No. 52568.

protests 99669-K, etc. (New York).

#### Victor Cory Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Kraft-Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(T. D. 47955) it was held that an allowance for the weight of the paper or foil, or both, should have been made by the collector from the net weight used in computing the duty thereon.
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 69 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 69 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 69 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 69 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 69 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 69 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 69 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 69 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 8 of 8
No. 49594.

#### Protest 94787-K of Eugene B. Baehr & Sons (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial it was agreed by counsel that the harmonicas are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 40586, which record was incorporated herein. In'accordance therewith the claim under paragraph 1541 was sustained.
----

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2006 — Jongste v Commission

(Case T-249/99) (1)

(2006/C 261/59)

Language of the case: Dutch

The President of the Second Chamber Extended Composition has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

----

(1)OJ C 6, 8.1.2000.

----
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"ARIAL,Regular"		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII&"ARIAL,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-14	&"Arial,Bold"VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"August 2019
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Click2learn, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Kevin M. Oakes, Chief Executive Officer and I, John D. Atherly, Chief Financial Officer, of Click2learn, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Form 10-Q
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Click2learn, Inc.



Dated:  February
10, 2004



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    KEVIN M.
OAKES  
|Kevin M. Oakes         
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|/s/    JOHN D.
ATHERLY 
|John D. Atherly        
|Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 38-2 Filed 10/29/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 38-2 Filed 10/29/2003 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER CORPORATION INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             790
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,569
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,383
<INVENTORY>                                    111,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               212,403
<PP&E>                                         418,065
<DEPRECIATION>                                 100,621
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 630,625
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,640
<BONDS>                                        203,991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           55,983
<PREFERRED>                                         34
<COMMON>                                           163
<OTHER-SE>                                      60,244
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   630,625
<SALES>                                        146,927
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               146,927
<CGS>                                          137,937
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  137,937
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,312
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6,117)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6,117)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6,117)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (1.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (1.79)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BAKER, WILLIE ANDREWS, )

RICHARD ELEY, and TROY VARGAS, ) CIV. S-04-549 GEB GGH

)

Plaintiffs, )

) 

v. ) ORDER

) 

ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER APPAREL,)

INC., JEFF BLACK, DON CLOWES, )

DOUG BATTISTA, WILL POLIFKA, )

GREG LEWIS, TIM BICKERTON, )

DAVE KOCH, and TOM VELASCO, )

)

Defendants. )

)

The Court minutes filed September 13, 2005, seem to indicate

that the parties have stipulated to have this action reassigned to

Magistrate Judge Drozd for all purposes, since the minutes state the

parties “stipulate [that the] Magistrate Judge [will] retain

jurisdiction for enforcement of [their] settlement.” If this is what

the parties intend to do, a filing to reassign the case under Local

Rule 73-305(b) is required. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 26, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00549-DAD Document 148 Filed 09/27/05 Page 1 of 1
YEAR 2000 PROGRESS

Grade Distribution

3

1

0

CDF

Grades

ent and Agency Grades

November 22, 1999

report card and have your

or agency head sign

f your progress this grading period:

ncy Chief Information Officer

nt or Agency Head

REPORT CARD

For

Federal Departments and

Agencies

Prepared for Subcommittee Chairman Stephen Horn November 22, 1999Subcommittee on Government Management, Information, and Technology
YEAR 2000 PROGRESS REPORT CARD

96

July

 99

Feb

99

June

99

Aug

99

Nov

96

July

99

Feb

99

June

99

Aug

99

Nov

A A A A

A SBA Small Business Administration A A A- AB

B A A A

A State Department of State B F A- A

B

gency F B+ A A

A DOT Department of Transportation F F C BB

ment D A- A A

A AID Agency for International Development A FF D

B

B A- A A

A EPA Environmental Protection Agency D A A A- B

C A A A

A

D A- A A

A DOD Department of Defense C C- C- D C+

F B A A

A HHS Dept of Health and Human Services D C+ B- C

C

D A- A AA Treasury Department of the Treasury C B- C CCD A- A- AA

min D B+ B B+

A Justice Department of Justice D B C CD

F B C+ B

A

A A- A A A- Administration Overall Federal Departments and Agencies * C+ B- B- B+

D B B B A- *Administration grade not given.D C C+ C- A- Grades are based on mission-critical systems and associated criteria.

Prepared for Subcommittee Chairman Stephen Horn. Subcommittee on Government Management,Information, and Technology. Issued November 22,1999. Subcommittee Home Page on the Internet:http://www.house.gov/reform/gmit.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,837] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 26, 2007, in response to a worker petition filed on behalf of workers at Bright Horizons/MSX/Norfolk Assembly Plant, Norfolk, Virginia. 

The petitioners have requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of February, 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

 [FR Doc. E7-3277 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# sec6_rbalsh_2018

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2018-05	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RBS - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2018
Order filed, May 06, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00840-CR

____________

LORENZA ANDRE SAM, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-DCR-055360A

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due September 30, 2013. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. On December 12, 2013, this court granted the court reporters 

request for extension of time to file the record until January 02, 2014 with no 

further extensions. On January 07, 2014 this court granted the court reporters 

second request for extension of time to file the record until February 06, 2014 

with no further extensions. To date, the record has not been filed with the court. 
Because the reporter’s record was not filed within the time prescribed in the first 

two extensions the court issues the following order.

We order Elizabeth Wittu, the official court reporter, to file the record in 

this appeal on or before May 05, 2014. No further extension will be 

entertained. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that 

the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Elizabeth 

Wittu does not timely file the record as ordered, the Court may issue an order 

directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure 

to file the record.

PER CURIAM