alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT JUNE 30, 1997 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE
30, 1997.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,889
<SECURITIES>                                     7,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,738
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,875
<INVENTORY>                                      1,948
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,405
<PP&E>                                          50,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,180
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  92,637
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,290
<BONDS>                                         43,310
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            75
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,962
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    92,637
<SALES>                                        225,093
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               279,380
<CGS>                                          205,914
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  256,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,822
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,810
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,379
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,379
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.49
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen K. Gartside, Jr., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EvolvingSystems, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August 12, 2005                 |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| /s/ STEPHEN K. GARTSIDE, JR.          |   |
| Stephen K. Gartside, Jr.              |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10Q AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,822                   1,822
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,358                  10,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                       200                     200
<INVENTORY>                                        561                     561
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,702                  12,702
<PP&E>                                           1,617                   1,617
<DEPRECIATION>                                     649                     649
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  18,557                  18,557
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,738                  10,738
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           20,370                  20,370
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           211                     211
<OTHER-SE>                                    (13,791)                (13,791)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    18,557                  18,557
<SALES>                                         11,601                  22,413
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,601                  22,413
<CGS>                                            7,657                  15,056
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,657                  15,056
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,046                   7,724
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    81                      81
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  65                     110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (248)                   (558)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (248)                   (558)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (248)                   (558)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.16)                  (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)                  (0.34)


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOHN FRANCIS HILDEBRAND,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0607 FCD GGH P

vs.

VERNE SPEIRS, et al., 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner has timely filed a notice of appeal of this court's July 27, 2005,denial of

his application for a writ of habeas corpus. Before petitioner can appeal this decision, a

certificate of appealability must issue. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b).

A certificate of appealability may issue under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 “only if the

applicant has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2). The certificate of appealability must “indicate which specific issue or issues

satisfy” the requirement. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(3).

A certificate of appealability should be granted for any issue that petitioner can

demonstrate is “‘debatable among jurists of reason,’” could be resolved differently by a different

court, or is “‘adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.’” Jennings v. Woodford,

Case 2:04-cv-00607-FCD-GGH Document 24 Filed 09/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

 Except for the requirement that appealable issues be specifically identified, the standard

for issuance of a certificate of appealability is the same as the standard that applied to issuance of

a certificate of probable cause. Jennings, at 1010.

2

290 F.3d 1006, 1010 (9th Cir. 2002) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 (1983)).1

Petitioner has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right in

the following issues presented in the instant petition: 1) ineffective assistance of counsel based

on counsel’s failure to investigate complaining witness Lederman’s record of making false

charges and false statements; 2) ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel’s failure to

investigate complaining witness Lederman’s poor reputation and character for untruthfulness; 3)

ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel’s failure to investigate collusion between

witnesses Lederman and Rodriguez; 4) denial of due process by admission of uncharged

misconduct; 5) whether petitioner was entitled to an evidentiary hearing.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is

issued in the present action.

DATED:September 22, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00607-FCD-GGH Document 24 Filed 09/23/05 Page 2 of 2
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Prices Received: Minnesota-Wisconsin Manufacturing Grade Milk            NASS

----

Frequency of Release:Not Specified

----

Category:Animals and Animal Products:Dairy

Keywords:manufacturing grade milkmilk pricesmilk productionminnesotawisconsin

----

## Releases

            -  « Previous 
            -  Next » 
            -  1 
            -  2 

| Jun  1, 1999 | PDFTXT | Jun  1, 1999: Prices Received: Minnesota-Wisconsin Manufacturing Grade Milk detailsx                Jun  1, 1999: Prices Received: Minnesota-Wisconsin Manufacturing Grade MilkRelease datetime:Jun  1, 1999Close |
|--------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact office name:National Agricultural Statistics Service

Contact email:nass@nass.usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
No. 56372.

Suit 4716.

#### United States *v.*Gillette Safety Razor Co.

C. D. 1346. (Appeal dismissed December 14, 1951.)
Before the First Division,

December 17, 1941

No. 46680.

#### Protest 946567-G of Fung Chong & Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Wing Duck*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446) the Chinese merchandise in question was held not to be distilled spirits and therefore not subject to said internal revenue tax; apricot kernels were held dutiable at 3 cents per pound under paragraph 762, following Abstract 34104; and crude drugs were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1669 on the authority of Abstract 44821. The protest was therefore sustained to that extent.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian R. Ervine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/   BRIAN R. ERVINE                                                     |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| Brian   R. Ervine                                                         |   |
| Executive   Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer |   |
| May   11, 2011                                                            |   |

 

This certification is furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

IN RE:

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY

TELECOMMUNICATIONS RECORDS

LITIGATION

This Document Relates To:

ALL CASES

 /

MDL Docket No 06-1791 VRW

ORDER

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE ORDER UPON 

TRANSFER PURSUANT TO § 1407(a)

1) This order shall govern the practice and procedure in

those actions transferred to this court by the Judicial

Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL Panel) pursuant to

its order of August 9, 2006, as well as all related

actions originally filed in this court or transferred or

removed to this court. This order shall also govern the

practice and procedure in any tag-along actions

transferred to this court by the MDL Panel pursuant to

Rule 12 of the Rules of Procedure of the MDL Panel

subsequent to the filing of the final transfer order by

the clerk of this court and any related actions

subsequently filed, transferred or removed to this court.

2) The actions described in paragraph 1 of this order are

consolidated for pretrial purposes.

Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW Document 15 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 2

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

3) All pleadings and submissions in these actions shall be

e-filed; no paper copies will be necessary. All

submissions filed in these actions shall bear the

identification “MDL Docket No 06-1791 VRW,” and when such

a submission relates to all of these actions, the “MDL

Docket No 06-1791 VRW” shall be followed by the notation

“ALL CASES.” If a submission does not relate to all of

these actions, the docket number of the individual action

or actions assigned by the clerk of this court shall

follow “MDL Docket No 06-1791 VRW.” 

4) Any submission which is to be filed in any of these

actions shall be filed only with the clerk of this court

and not with the transferor district court.

5) Any orders including protective orders previously entered

by this court or any transferor district court shall

remain in full force and effect unless modified by this

court upon application. 

6) The court will calendar an initial case management

conference shortly after September 15, 2006.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case M:06-cv-01791-VRW Document 15 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Internal Qualified Reserves Evaluator

I, Richard Leslie, hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Husky Energy Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2015, which is being filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of my Report on Reserves Data dated January 29, 2016 (the Report), included
in the 2015 Annual Information Form of Husky Energy Inc. (the AIF), and to the references to my name in the AIF. I also hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of the Report in the Companys registration statements on Form
S-8 (File No. 333-187135) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-208443) filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. I have signed this Consent in my capacity as an employee of Husky
Energy Inc. and not in my personal capacity.



|                         |  |                                      
|------------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|By:                      |  | /s/ Richard Leslie, P. Eng           
|                         |  | Richard Leslie, P. Eng               
|                         |  | Manager, Reserves                    
|                         |  | Internal Qualified Reserves Evaluator
|                        
|Calgary, Alberta, Canada
|February 26, 2016
Mineral Resources On-Line Spatial Data

Mineral Resources > Online Spatial Data > Geology > by state > Florida

Florida geology

To zoom in, hold shift key and drag mouse; click a geologic unit for details

-82.47559, 30.48447

[Geologic maps of this area, from the National Geologic Map Database catalog]

[Legend for the lithology shown on the map]

Download data shown on the map above:

Choose format: Google Earth 6 Get Data

City name: begins with 6 State: Florida 6 Search

[Specify coordinates?]

Map size: [Small] - [Medium] - [Large]

Florida geology Page 1 of 2

http://mrdata.usgs.gov/sgmc/fl.html 7/13/2011
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey

URL: http://mrdata.usgs.gov/sgmc/fl.html

Page Contact Information: Peter Schweitzer

Page Last Modified: Monday, 16-May-2011 16:37:26 EDT 

Florida geology Page 2 of 2

http://mrdata.usgs.gov/sgmc/fl.html 7/13/2011
Water Resources of Michigan

An Annotated Bibliography of Selected References on the Estimated Rates of Direct Ground-Water Discharge to the Great Lakes

US Geological Survey  Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4039Lansing, Michigan 1998

By: Norman G. Grannemann and Thomas L. Weaver 

----

Accessible Web version is available in Web (HTML) format at:http://mi.water.usgs.gov/pubs/WRIR/WRIR98-4039/WRIR98-4039LW.php

Table of Contents including Figures, Maps, Graphs, Tables, Appendix, Conversion Factors and Vertical Datum, and Additional Information.http://mi.water.usgs.gov/pubs/WRIR/WRIR98-4039/WRIR98-4039TOC.php

Abstract
Estimated rates of direct ground-water discharge to Lake Michigan range from 800 to 6,700 cubic feet per second. Highest rates are calculated for the northeastern shore of the Lake. Using generalized values, total direct ground-water discharge to Lake Michigan was estimated to be about 2,700 cubic feet per second. Insufficient data are available to make similar estimates for the remaining Great Lakes (Huron, Superior, Erie, and Ontario), but estimated rates from six studies are much smaller than those from studies for Lake Michigan.
Citation:
Grannemann, Norman G. and Weaver, Thomas L., An Annotated Bibliography of Selected References on the Estimated Rates of Direct Ground-Water Discharge to the Great Lakes, U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4039.
Back to Publications list
Back to USGS, WRD Michigan Home Page
U.S. Department of the Interior ||  U.S. Geological Survey| |Water Resources Division||  Michigan DistrictMaintainer:  Webmaster (gs-w-milns_webmaster@usgs.gov)Last modified: December 09 2002 14:45:33.Privacy Statement || Disclaimer|| FOIA || Accessibility URL Address: http://mi.water.usgs.gov