alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6246

VICTOR TOWNES, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusCITY OF BALTIMORE; UNKNOWN BALTIMORE CITY UNIFORM, and Possible Plainclothes Police Officers and their Superiors; UNKNOWN BALTIMORE FIRE & AMBULANCE SERVICE ATTENDANTS; UNKNOWN FIELD DIRECTORS OF THE BALTIMORE F.B.I. OFFICE; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTM ENT; UNKNOWN BALTIMORE CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER; UNKNOWN COMMISSIONER FOR THE BALTIMORE CITY FIRE AND AMBULANCE SERVICES; VAUGHN FOREMAN, Trooper; SAMUEL N. WICHNER, Special Agent, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA95-3529-WMN) Submitted: May 1, 1997 Decided: May 13, 1997 Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor Townes, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Charles Derr, As sistant City Solicitor, William Rowe Ph elan, Jr., OFFICE OF THE CITY SOLICITOR, Baltimore, Maryland; Charles Joseph Peters, Sr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland; Duane Anthony2 Verderaime, BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Baltimore, Maryland; John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland; Donald E. Hoffman, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals a district court order dismissing some, butnot all, parties from his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is nondispositive as to the entire action and therefore not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (19 94), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED3
June 17, 1942

No. 47318.

#### Protest 44266-K of Henry Seligman.

C. D. 617. Motion of Government for rehearing granted.
### NUM BER 13-0 9-00 701- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ GERA LD D . SH EET S, A pp ellan t,
v . TH E OK ONIT E C OM PA NY, A pp ellee.

____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ On ap pe al f rom th e 3 47t h Dist rict C ou rt of N ue ces Co un ty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ju stice s R od rigu ez, Garza, a nd B en av ide s M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam Appel lee The Okoni te C ompany ( “O koni te” ) has filed a n u n o p p osed moti on to dis mis s t he appeal as to appell ant Gerald D. Sh eets ( “S heets ”)on g ro unds that Sheetshad all cl aims non- sui ted o r other w is e di smi ss ed ag ain st Oko nit e.2

The Co urt, hav ing co nsi dered th e doc uments on f ile , i s o f the opi nio n tha t t he moti on s hould be g ra nted. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.3. Appel lee ’s unoppo sed moti on to dis mi s s i s g ra n t e d , a n d t h e a p p e a l b ro u g h t b y a p p e l l a n t G e ra l d D

. S h e e t s a g ain st The Oko nit e C ompany

i s h ereby

D ISM ISSE D FO R W AN T OF JU RI SD IC TION

. P E RC U R I A M Del iv ered and filed the 14th day of Janua ry , 201 0.
No. 54621.

#### Eve Brueser Studios, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 117167-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 78, C. A. D. 401), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 53480.

protests 144174-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Eastern Grocery Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Case No. 6,241.

#### GAREY v. UNION BANK.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 91.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1826.

Depositions Taken by Cocntt Commissioner.

A “county commissioner,” in the state of Illinois, is not authorized to take depositions under the judiciary act of September 24. 1789, S 30 [1 Stat. 73], to be used in the courts of the United States.

In equity.

Mr. Taylor, for defendants

[the Union Bank of Georgetown], objected to a deposition. purporting to be taken de bene esse under the thirtieth section of the judiciary act of 1789, which authorizes such depositions to be taken “before any justice or judge of any of the courts of the United States; or before any chancellor, justice, or judge of a supreme or superior court, mayor or chief magistrate of a city; or judge of a county court, or court of common pleas of any of the United States.” The deposition was taken before a county commissioner of the state of Illinois, who is a judge of the county commissioners’ court, which is a •court of record composed of three judges, called county commissioners, who are elected by the people and hold their offices for the term of two years. They hold four sessions a year, and their jurisdiction extends to all matter concerning the county revenue, and the county tax. • They grant licenses for ferries and taverns, and other licenses. They have jurisdiction in all cases of roads, canals, toll-bridges, and many other cases appertaining to county government and police; and have power to issue all kinds of writs and processes necessary to the execution of their jurisdiction. 3 Griff. Law Reg. 412.

THE COURT

(nem. con.), rejected the deposition, being of opinion that the county commissioners’- court was not one of the courts described in Act Cong. Sept 24, 1789, § 30 (1 Stat. 73).
#### Carol A. ROTHER, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

No. 00-3323.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 27, 2001.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

Carol A. Rother moves for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing her appeal for failure to file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement or a brief.

In this case, the Merit Systems Protection Board affirmed OPM’s disallowance of Rother’s application for disability benefits. Rother petitioned this court for review. Her petition was dismissed for failure to file a brief and to file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement.*

In her petition for review, Rother notes that she disagrees with the administrative law judge’s determination that she did not show that she is disabled for purposes of receiving disability benefits. Pursuant to *Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management,*470 U.S. 768, 105 S.Ct. 1620, 84 L.Ed.2d 674 (1985), this court has no jurisdiction to review that issue. *Lindahl,*470 U.S. at 791, 105 S.Ct. 1620 (“the factual underpinnings of [5 U.S.C. ] § 8347 disability determinations may not be judicially reviewed”). We will grant Rother’s motion to the extent that it changes the ground for dismissal of Rother’s case. Rother’s petition is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and not for failure to prosecute.

*945Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Rother’s motion for reconsideration is granted in part. The mandate is recalled and the court’s order dismissing Rother’s petition for failure to prosecute is vacated.

(2) This petition for review is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

(3) Each side shall bear its own costs.

*

 The court notes that the due date for filing the brief had not passed and the case was incorrectly dismissed on that ground.
**Part 2	Fiscal Year 2022 Reporting**

**SUPPLEMENT	Section III**

**U.S. Standard General Ledger Account Transaction Categories**

**TRANSACTION**

**CODETRANSACTION DESCRIPTION**

A. **Funding**

100 - 399	Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections 400 - 699	Authority Transfers

700 - 799	Reimbursables and Other Income

B. **Disbursements and Payables**

E. **Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections**

100 - 399	Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499	Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above 500 - 799	Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

F. **Yearend**

100 - 299	Preclosing Entries

300 - 499	Closing Entries

G. **Memorandum Entries**

100 - 299	All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

H. **Other Specialized Transaction Entries**

100 - 799	Other

**Bulletin No. 2021-17	III AC - 1	June 2021**
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Security Reports: Users by Role (FPA)

To view users by role (FPA) report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, select Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Security Reports, select User by Role (FPA). The Users by Role (FPA) parameters 

page appears.

Enter your search criteria.

• Select a user Role

• Select Yes or No for Report With Children 

• Select Yes to generate a report that contains data for the selected OTC Endpoint as well 

as all of the lower level OTC Endpoints. 

• Select No to generate a report that contains data only for the selected OTC Endpoint.

3. Select an OTC Endpoint to initiate the report. The report Users by Role (FPA) preview page 

appears as shown in Figure 1.

4. Under Export as, you have the following options:

• Select PDF, Excel or Word format

• Select Download

Or

• Select Print PDF Report

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1. Users by Role (FPA) Preview Page

• For new users who have not logged into OTCnet yet, both the User Name and User 

ID values will be empty in the database and displayed as blank values on the 

preview page.

• If your agency has over 50 endpoints and/or over 100 users, you must drill down to a 

lower level within your agency to run the report. Running the report at a lower level 

prevents the report from overloading. Overloading results in a report with no data 

output.

• TGA denotes a deposit processing OTC Endpoint.

• CHK denotes a check capture OTC Endpoint.

• M denotes a mapped accounting code; an open lock denotes access permission; 

and a closed lock denotes no access permission.

CDC denotes card processing OTC Endpoint.

Select Previous to return to the previous page.

Application Tips

Application Tips

Additional Button
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **2 -**  **6043**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. CARLTON LAMONT MURDOCK , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the West ern District of Virginia , at Roanoke
. James C. Turk , Senior District Judge. ( 7:08

- cr - 00010

- JCT

- 1 )

Submitted : March 29, 2012 Decided: April 3, 2012

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirm ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Carlton Lamont Murdock , Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford , Assistant United States Attorney , Roanoke , Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Carlton Lamont Murdock appeals the distr ict court ’ s order denying his motion for sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Murdock , No. 7: 08

- cr 00010

- JCT

- 1 (W.D. Va. Dec. 29, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Before The First Division,

December 18, 1942

No. 47811.

#### Protests 2111-K, etc., of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (New York).

*355Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Abstracts 47083 and 47500 the harmonicas and mouth organs in question were held dutiable at 40 percent under paragraph 1541 as claimed. x
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DARRYL MURRAY : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

DAVID S. FERRIERO, Archivist of the United :

States, National Archives and Records :

Administration : NO. 05-4557

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29 day of January, 2013, it having been reported to the court th

that the issues between plaintiff and defendant in this action have been settled, and upon Order

of the court, pursuant to the provisions of 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this

court, it is ORDERED that:

1. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel and

pro se plaintiff without costs, AS TO DAVID S. FERRIERO, ARCHIVIST OF THE UNITED

STATES, NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION, THE NAMED

DEFENDANT TO THIS ACTION.

2. The Clerk is directed to mark this case CLOSED.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT:

/s/ Madeline F. Ward /s/ Norma L. Shapiro 

 Madeline F. Ward, Deputy Clerk J.

Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 50 Filed 01/29/13 Page 1 of 1
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDEDSeptember 30, 2010
    
    
    September 30, 2009MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    7,341
    
    
    $
    8,551
    
    
    $
    7,341
    
    
    $
    8,552Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    7,120
    
    
    
    7,340
    
    
    
    7,120
    
    
    
    7,340Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    7,120
    
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    7,120
    
    
    $
    7,340Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.16
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
 FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDEDSeptember 30, 2010
    
    
    September 30, 2009MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    22,021
    
    
    $
    25,654
    
    
    $
    22,021
    
    
    $
    25,661Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    21,360
    
    
    
    22,020
    
    
    
    21,360
    
    
    
    22,020Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    21,360
    
    
    $
    22,020
    
    
    $
    21,360
    
    
    $
    22,020Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
/Letterhead/

                      Schvaneveldt & Company
                   Certified Public Accountant
                275 East South Temple, Suite #300
                    Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
                          (801) 521-2392

Darrell T. Schvaneveldt, C.P.A.



               Consent of Darrell T. Schvaneveldt
                       Independent Auditor




I consent to the use, of our report dated October 20, 1999, on
the financial statements in the Form 10-KSB, of Customer Sports,
Inc., dated July 31, 1998, included herein and to the reference
made to me.



/S/ Schvaneveldt & Company
Salt Lake City, Utah
October 20, 1999
**Exhibit 10. (o)**

 

**AMENDMENT FOUR**

**TO**

**THE FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION**

**EXECUTIVE SUPPLEMENTAL PLAN**

**(1996 Restatement)**

 

The FleetBoston Financial Corporation Executive Supplemental Plan(“Plan”) is amended effective January 1, 2003, as follows: 

 

1. Section 1.2 of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

 

“1.2 **Purpose of the Plan**. The purpose of the Plan is to provide key employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and affiliates (the “Employer”), with the opportunity to defer receipt of six percent of base salaryabove a threshold specified herein, as well as to receive matching credits, to make up for benefits they would have received under the FleetBoston Financial Savings Plan (the “Fleet Savings Plan”) but for limitations imposed oncontributions under the Fleet Savings Plan by Sections 402(g) and 401(a)(17) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (and the provisions of the Fleet Savings Plan applying those limitations) (hereinafter referred to as the “CodeLimitations”).” 

 

2. Article 2 of the Plan is amendedby replacing the term “Director of Rewards, Recognition and Benefit Services” with “Director of Compensation and Benefits” wherever the former appears. 

 

3. The first sentence of Article 3 of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

 

“Each employee of the Employer who satisfies the following threerequirements shall be eligible to participate in the Plan during a specified future Plan Year if so notified by the Committee: (1) the employee is a participant in the Fleet Savings Plan; (2) the annual rate of the employee’s regular basesalary in November of a Plan Year is in excess of the lesser of (a) the quotient of the dollar limit on Section 401(k) contributions under Section 402(g) for the following calendar year divided by six percent, or (b) the Section 401(a)(17)compensation limit for the following calendar year; and (3) the employee is employed during the deferral election period in December of such Plan Year.” 

4. The first sentence of Article 5 of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

 

“For each calendar year, a Participant may irrevocably elect to deferreceipt of six percent of his or her regular base salary payments, commencing with the first base salary payment due after the Participant has deferred receipt of the maximum amount of base salary which he or she is permitted to defer on a pre-taxbasis under the Fleet Savings Plan because of the Code Limitations.” 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment Four was adopted by the Human Resources Committee at its December 16, 2003 meeting and is executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company on this 19th day of December 2003.

 

 

**FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION**

By:
 
/S/    M. ANNE SZOSTAK
  M. Anne Szostak  
Executive Vice President and Director of Human Resources
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               5                     357
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   46,283                  25,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,854                     513
<INVENTORY>                                     21,122                  21,331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,893                  51,787
<PP&E>                                           2,352                   1,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  84,202                  53,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,026                  18,733
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           104                     103
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,262                  29,070
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    84,202                  53,835
<SALES>                                        148,850                 114,721
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               148,850                 114,721
<CGS>                                          109,607                  85,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,067                  16,539
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,187                   1,790
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,880                  11,090
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,250                   2,814
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,630                   8,276
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,630                   8,276
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .83                     .88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83                     .88


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE DECEMBER 31, 1996 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             184
<SECURITIES>                                         8
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,101
<ALLOWANCES>                                        34
<INVENTORY>                                        775
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,536
<PP&E>                                           2,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                     958
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,290
<BONDS>                                          1,164
<COMMON>                                           221
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,870
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,622
<SALES>                                          6,703
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,703
<CGS>                                            5,030
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,030
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 120
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    568
<INCOME-TAX>                                       210
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       358
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     3.31
        

</TABLE>