alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Security Reports: Users by Role (FI)

To view users by role (FI) report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, select Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Security Reports, select User by Role (FI). The Users by Role (FI) parameters page 

appears.

Enter your search criteria.

o Select a user Role.

o Select Yes or No for Report With Children

• For Report with Children, select Yes to generate a report that contains data for the 

selected FIs and all lower level FIs. 

• For Report with Children, select No to generate a report that contains data only for 

the selected FI.

• TGA denotes a deposit processing OTC Endpoint.

• CHK denotes a check capture OTC Endpoint.

• M denotes a mapped accounting code; an open lock denotes access permission; 

and a closed lock denotes no access permission.

• CDC denotes card processing OTC Endpoint.

3. Select a Financial Institution to initiate the report. The Users by Role (FI) preview page 

appears as shown in Figure 1.

4. Under Export as, you have the following options:

o Select PDF, Excel or Word format

o Select Download

Or

o Select Print PDF Report

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1: Users by Role (FI) Preview Page

For new users who have not logged into OTCnet yet, both the User Name and User ID

values will be empty in the database and displayed as blank values on the preview page. 

Select Previous to return to the previous page.

Application Tip

Additional Button
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed
pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.

    The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Ispat Inland Inc.

Date: March 30, 2005                     /s/ LOUIS L. SCHORSCH
      --------------                     ---------------------------------------
                                         Louis L. Schorsch
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         Ispat Inland Inc.



                                       14
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

    Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed
pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.

    The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Ispat Inland Inc.

Date: March 30, 2005                     /s/ MICHAEL G. RIPPEY
      --------------                     ---------------------------------------
                                         Michael G. Rippey
                                         Executive Vice President Commercial



                                       15
| 1.   | Section 2(c) of the      Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following sentence to the end of      Section 2(c): |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The remainder of the      Agreement shall remain in full force andeffect. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | ALLIANT      ENERGY CORPORATION(the      "Company")  |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By: |   |
|--------|-----|--------|

|   | Its: |   |
|--------|------|--------|

|   | EMPLOYEE: |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|
|   |      |   |
|   |      |   |

|   | Eliot G.      Protsch |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
No. 47330.

#### Protests 58412-K, etc., of M. V. Jenkins (Seattle).

*368Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is .similar in all material respects to that the subject of Seaboard *Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported and that no addition should have been made for planing, or tonguing and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
No. 54020.

#### Cohen Wholesale Grocer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 146551-K (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

When this case was called for trial it was submitted upon the official papers, the plaintiff having indicated by letter that “the grounds we have for the protest are fully and completely set out in the protest, and that our *369appearance to argue the same would be superfluous.” An examination of the record failing to disclose any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLARENDON NATIONAL INSURANCE ] Case No.: CIV.S-04-853 MCE PAN 

COMPANY and INSURANCE CORPORATION ] 

OF HANNOVER, ] 

 ] 

 Plaintiffs, ] 

 ] ORDER ON DISMISSAL OF 

 vs. ] ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 

 ] 

FRANCISCO CRUZ; CONNIE CRUZ; ] [F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)]

FERNANDO CRUZ; ANTONIA CRUZ; JUAN ] 

RAMOS CRUZ; MARIA LUISA FRAUSTO DE ] __________________________________ 

CRUZ; BRENDA CRUZ, a minor by and through ] 

her Guardian Ad Litem, MARIA LUISA ] 

FRAUSTO DE CRUZ; DIANA LAURA CRUZ ] 

FRAUSTO, a minor by and through her Guardian ] 

Ad Litem, MARIA LUISA FRAUSTO DE CRUZ; ] 

JAIME CRUZ FRAUSTO, a minor by and through ] 

her Guardian Ad Litem, MARIA LUISA ] 

FRAUSTO DE CRUZ; LIZETTE CRUZ ] 

FRAUSTO, a minor by and through her Guardian ] 

Ad Litem, MARIA LUISA FRAUSTO DE CRUZ; ] 

VIKTOR KHASHCHUK; VALERY TUTELYA; ] 

TVN TRANSPORTATION, INC., a Nevada ] 

Corporation; AMERICOLD LOGISTICS, LLC, a ] 

Delaware Corporation; IGOR PARFENOV; IGOR ] 

PARFENOV d.b.a. DC TRANSPORT; ] 

ADVANTAGE SYSTEMS, INC., an Iowa ] 

Corporation; CITY OF TRACY; COUNTY OF ] 

SAN JOAQUIN; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; and, ] 

DOES 1 through 25, Inclusive, ] 

 ] 

 Defendants. ] 

_________________________________________ ] 

/ / / 

Case 2:04-cv-00853-MCE -PAN Document 35 Filed 04/19/05 Page 1 of 2
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and 

parties' written stipulation to dismissal of this action with prejudice on file with the Court, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed with prejudice. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: April 18, 2005 

__________________________________ 

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:04-cv-00853-MCE -PAN Document 35 Filed 04/19/05 Page 2 of 2
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Remove User Access in SailPoint IIQ

To remove OTCnet user access, complete the following steps:

1. At the top left of left of the application, select the Hamburger Menu to display the options.

2. Select the Manage Access option, then select Manage User Access.

3. Search for the user by typing their email address and select the Search button (blue 

magnifying glass) as shown in Figure 1.

4. Select the checkmark to the left of the user's email address in the returned search result, 

then select Next at the bottom of the page.

Figure 1: Search Users Screen 

5. Select Remove Access as shown in Figure 2. Then select the Magnifying Glass icon to 

the right of the text box to return all currently assigned HLOs or roles for the selected user. 

Select Next. 

Figure 2: Remove User Access Screen 
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

The requestor will only be able to remove HLOs or roles that they are authorized to 

manage.

6. Review the information to confirm the removal as shown in Figure 3. You may add any 

comments using the voice bubble on the right side. Then select the Submit button to 

confirm the changes. 

 Figure 3: Review and Submit Remove Access Screen 

If the information is incorrect, select the Previous button to modify the removal.

Application Tip

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Search for and View an Adjustment

To search for and view an adjustment, complete the following steps:

1. Click Deposit Processing, click Search Adjustments. The Search Adjustments page 

appears. 

2. Enter the search criteria and click Search.

Under Search Conditions, optional

• Select an Organization

• Select an OTC Endpoint

• Enter an ALC (Agency Location Code)

• Select an Adjustment Category

• Enter a Voucher #

• Select an Adjustment Type

• Enter the Prepared by name

• Select an Adjustment Reason

• Enter the From: and To: Voucher Dates

• Enter the From: and To: Adjustment Amount

• Enter the From: and To: Deposit Date

• Enter the From: and To: Original Deposit Date

Additional search criteria is displayed as shown in Error! Reference source not found.. 

Figure 1. Additional Search Criteria
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Voucher From date must be five years or less prior to the current date. Vouchers more 

than five years old can be viewed from the Historical Reports menu.

3. The Search Results table appears. Click the Voucher Number of the adjustment for the

details you need to view.

Values do not display in the Adjustment Amount column for unconfirmed foreign check 

item deposits that were entered with a Country of Deposit of Other.

Click Download to save the adjustment results as an XML or CSV file. 

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

• Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page. 

• Click View Voucher Event Log to view the history of the deposit voucher.

Application Tip

Application Tip

Application Tip

Additional Buttons
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEANNETTE HALLEY : CIVIL ACTION

:

:

v. : No. 05-3513

:

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of Social Security :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of August, 2006, upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s

Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 8), the defendant’s Motion for Summary

Judgment (Document No. 9), the parties’ briefs, the Report and Recommendation of United

States Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport (Document No. 12), the plaintiff’s objections,

and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The plaintiff’s objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3. The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED;

4. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED; and,

5. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. 

 /s/ Timothy J. Savage 

 TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:05-cv-03513-TJS Document 14 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Circle Group
Holdings, Inc. as of June 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related statements of
operations, and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods then ended.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the company's
management. We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and
making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It
is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying interim financial statements for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.

As discussed in Note 2, certain conditions indicate that the Company may be
unable to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial
statements do not include any adjustments to the consolidated financial
statements that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a
going concern.


/s/Spector & Wong, LLP
-----------------------
Pasadena, CA
August 9, 2005
Exhibit 4.19


Table of Contents

 Exhibit 4.19 

 [THE COCA-COLA COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

 June 2, 2008 

 Industria Nacional de Gaseosas S.A. 

Colombia 

 Dear Sirs: 

 In regards to the Bottler Agreement in force and effect since July 1, 1999 (“the Agreement”) entered into between you and The Coca-Cola Company (the “Company”), we inform you that a new bottler agreement is in the final stages of
  discussion and approval among the parties, which we estimate will be executed towards the middle of September 2008, hereby the Agreement is temporarily extended from March 31, 2008 until:

 September 30, 2008 

 With the exception of said extension, all the terms and conditions of the Agreement will continue to be fully valid until the expiration of said additional term, and once the extension expires, the Bottler will no longer have the right to claim a
  tacit renewal of the aforementioned Agreement.

 

		
	 	 Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ 
	 	 
	 	Authorized Representative 




 

		
	 Accepted by: 
	 
	INDUSTRIA NACIONAL DE GASEOSAS S.A. 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ 	 
	 	 
	Authorized Representative
[){Ut 

## 1!JA,s,**/1/J~** 

## / :33 1 f7 3 - 03 ,DL/ 

### ·fj_p{)}Jj ; ( r 

## fs /LJdl 

### /ca 

## YJ7lor:k 

# oP a JLe q!JJtf- 

## tould {lm

### ~m J7JlQ 

## +Jv I {jj)f JW 

### l!tU 9 CO!JLi!lAJ;/uCJ ' J/)1 Cf ( CUM

. · IS- J 10 

### Jl/1/1- 

## +hJ !OJJf LJJJ!;/ 

### I ); 

### Jed

## cJk Y<Jt (fuu - 

### {Jf Ji/1/

### ~1;1 

## J;j I 

## rhf1

.**~_2gtjc?b** 

# fs, · bJ(2[) 

## 1 j)a11Jch(f}11c/



## .. /(J!Z {J/!11-

### a~aSL 

## bq IN Cr!UAl5::
FacilityID SourceID LocationType Longitude Latitude UTMzone

1607_10 16070301L -76.17621 43.061582

1607_37 16070301L -84.17 39.81
SourceType Lengthx Lengthy Angle HorzDim VertDim

P000

P000
AreaVolReleaseHgt StackHgt_m StackDiameter_m ExitGasVel_m ExitGasTemp_K Elevation_m

0 5.181599992 1.219199998 8.839199987 299.814

0 5.181599992 1.219199998 8.839199987 299.814
HillHeight
Before the Second Division,

June 25, 1968

No. P68/279.

protests 62/9913, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### John A. Steer Company *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of battery-operated *1052blinker lanterns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *John A. Steer Company*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 229, Abstract 68673), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# sec5_custodialact_2021

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&10Draft	&"Arial,Bold"&10August 2021 IRC Meeting
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Park City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries**

**Certification Pursuant To**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A No. 2 for the year ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William Dunlavy, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: | January 5, 2007 |
|--------|-----------------|

 

| /s/ William Dunlavy

       |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| William Dunlavy

           |   |
| Principal Financial Officer, CFO |   |

 

 

**REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)**
No. 52566. protests 938038-G, etc. (New York).

#### S. A. Haram *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson,. J.

Certain items of the merchandise stipulated to consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*
      *207v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269 were held subject to an allowance for tare of inedible coverings of 2)4 percent from the net weight reported by the United States Weigher. The items of merchandise stipulated to be the same as the cheese involved in *S. A. Haram*v. *United States*(17 Cust. Ct. 37, C. D. 1016) were held properly dutiable at 5 cents per pound, but not less than 20 percent ad valorem, under the provision in paragraph 710, as modified by the trade agreement with Finland (T. D. 48554), for “Cheese having the eye formation characteristic of the Swiss or Emmenthaler type.”
null

164.80092
# Bulletin No. 2021-12

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-12	&"Arial,Bold"&P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2021

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-12	&"Arial,Bold"&P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2021
**EXHIBIT      21**

|  Name                of Entity                                              |   | State                of Incorporation/Jurisdiction |   | Doing                Business As                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| §  Southern                Indiana Gas and Electric Company, Inc. |   | Indiana                                            |   | Vectren                Energy Delivery of Indiana, Inc.  |
| §  Indiana                Gas Company, Inc.                       |   | Indiana,                Ohio                       |   | Vectren                Energy Delivery of Indiana, Inc.  |
| §  Vectren                Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc.           |   | Ohio                                               |   |                                                          |
#### William HALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLIGHT SAFETY INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-3239.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 7, 2001.

Before EBEL, STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

PAUL J. KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of • this appeal. *See*Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2); 10th *827Cir.R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

William Hall appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant on claims of employment discrimination pursuant to Title VII, the ADEA, and 28 U.S.C. § 1981; retaliation; and hostile work environment. The parties are familiar with the underlying facts; we need not repeat them here. This court has jurisdiction as a result of 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and reviews the district court’s summary judgment decision *de novo,*applying the same standards as that court pursuant to Rule 56(c). *Gossett v. Oklahoma ex rel. Bd. of Regents,*245 F.3d 1172, 1175 (10th Cir.2001).

On appeal, ■ appellant presents four issues, arguing that: 1) the district court erred in barring one of his § 1981 claims on statute of limitations grounds; 2) he has presented sufficient evidence of pretext precluding summary judgment on his failure-to-promote claims based on racial discrimination; 3) he has made out a prima facie case of retaliation; and 4) he has demonstrated the existence of a hostile work environment. All other issues which were decided by the district court and are not raised on appeal are considered waived. *See State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Mhoon,*31 F.3d 979, 984 n. 7 (10th Cir.1994).

After careful review of the entire record on appeal in light of appellant’s arguments and the applicable legal standards, we conclude that the district court correctly decided this case. Therefore, for substantially the same reasons contained in the district court’s thorough Memorandum and Order dated July 11, 2000, the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas is AFFIRMED.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir.R. 36.3.
October 08, 2013 

Docket FAA-2013-0655

Docket Management Facility

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Part 117 – Early Implementation/Transition Exemption Petition 

Dear Sir or Madam:

On September 26, 2013, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) requested 

certificate holders seeking to implement Part 117 before its effective date to submit individual 

petitions to the above-referenced docket number. Per the FAA’s request, Trans States Airlines

submits this exemption petition for both early implementation and transition of Part 117 to 

begin between December 29, 2013 and January 04, 2014. 

. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or require 

additional information. 

Respectfully submitted,

Keith Stamper

Director of Flight Operations

Trans States Airlines

11495 Navaid Road, Suite 340

Bridgeton, Missouri 63044

(314)222-4770

kstamper@transstates.net

Keith Stamper

Director of Flight Operations

Trans States Airlines

11495 Navaid Road, Suite 340

Bridgeton, Missouri 63044

(314) 222-4770

(314) 222-4766 Fax

kstamper@transstates.net
No. 63073.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protests 187188-K, etc. Buffalo).

*383Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fresh or frozen pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 59714, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.