alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00543-CV

In the Interest of E.S. and B.S., children

On Appeal from the

36th District Court of Live Oak County, Texas

Trial Cause No. L-17-0051-CV-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed as each 

appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay costs. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

February 28, 2019
No. 48455.

#### Protests 811785-G, etc., of Lichtman & Kopel, Inc., et al. (Rochester etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 5/26/2023 1

Using Foreclosure Notices to Challenge Voters 

Maletski v. Macomb County Republican Party 

(David M. Lawson, E.D. Mich. 2:08-cv-13982) 

Based on a news website’s report that one party was planning to use 

foreclosure notices to challenge voter registrations during the 2008 

general election, the other party filed a federal complaint to enjoin 

the plan. In preparation for a hearing, the parties learned that the 

news report was not accurate, so the parties stipulated dismissal on 

the day of the hearing. 

Subject: Nullifying registrations. Topic: Registration challenges. 

The Democratic Party filed a federal complaint against the Republican Party 

in the Eastern District of Michigan on September 16, 2008, accusing the Republican Party of a plan to use foreclosure notices to challenge voter eligibility in the 2008 general election.1

 On September 25, the plaintiffs sought a 

preliminary injunction.2

 On September 29, Judge David M. Lawson set hearing on the injunction motion for October 20.3

The controversy apparently arose from a September 10 report posted on 

a Michigan Messenger website quoting the Macomb County Republican Party chair as “planning to use a list of foreclosed homes to block people from 

voting in the upcoming election.”4 The chair promptly denied the accuracy 

of the report.5

 After the Democratic Party’s federal complaint was filed, the 

Michigan Messenger retracted its story.6 The chair then filed a defamation 

action in state court.7

On the day of the hearing, the parties stipulated dismissal.8

 Sometimes a 

case can be resolved by merely scheduling a hearing, which prompts communication among the parties.9

1. Complaint, Maletski v. Macomb Cty. Republican Party, No. 2:08-cv-13982 (E.D. Mich. 

Sept. 16, 2008), D.E. 1; see Gordon Trowbridge, Dems File Lawsuit to Block Use of Foreclosure Lists to Bar Voters, Detroit News, Sept. 17, 2008, at B1. 

2. Preliminary-Injunction Motion, Maletski, No. 2:08-cv-13982 (E.D. Mich. Sept. 25, 

2008), D.E. 12. 

3. Order, id. (Sept. 29, 2008), D.E. 15. 

Tim Reagan interviewed Judge Lawson for this report by telephone on October 3, 2012. 

4. Ex. 5, Complaint, supra note 1. 

5. See Kathleen Gray, GOP Won’t Use Foreclosure List to Block Voters, Detroit Free Press, 

Sept. 12, 2008, at B2; Macomb County GOP Leader Denies Plan to Block Votes, Lansing State 

J., Sept. 12, 2008, at A1. 

6. See Kathy Barks Hoffman, Web Site Admits Error Over One Republican’s Comments on 

Voting, Flint J., Sept. 21, 2008, at 5. 

7. See Macomb GOP Official Files Suit, Grand Rapids Press, Oct. 2, 2008, at B4. 

8. Order, Maletski, No. 2:08-cv-13982 (E.D. Mich. Oct. 20, 2008), D.E. 40; Stipulation, id.

(Oct. 20, 2008), D.E. 39; see Kathleen Gray, GOP Vows Not to Use Foreclosure Lists at Polls, 

Detroit Free Press, Oct. 21, 2008, at A13; Kathy Barks Hoffman, GOP, Dems Settle Foreclosure Flap, Grand Rapids Press, Oct. 21, 2008, at B6; Jim Lynch, Voter Suit Settlement 

Reached, Detroit News, Oct. 21, 2008, at B3. 

9. Interview with Hon. David M. Lawson, Oct. 3, 2012.
April 9, 1958

No. 61818.

#### Dulien Steel Products, Inc., of Calif, et al. *v.*United States,

protest 182769-K.

C. D. 1968. Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing denied.
No. 49125.

#### Protests 93755-K, etc., of G. Hirsch Sons, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Abstract 38647, fabrics, with fast edges, not exceeding 12 inches in width, in chief value of rayon, jacquard-figured, imported and withdrawn for consumption prior to the French Trade Agreement (T. D. 48316) were held dutiable at 70 percent ad valorem plus 45 cents per pound under paragraph 1308, and those subsequent thereto were held dutiable at 45 percent ad valorem plus 45 cents per pound under paragraph 1308 and said trade agreement. Woven fabrics *241wholly or in chief value of any of the materials provided for in paragraph 385, classified at 90 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1529 (a), imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to the said trade agreement were held dutiable at 55 percent under paragraph 385, and those subsequent thereto at 40 percent under paragraph 385 and the said French Trade Agreement, following *Meyer*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 191, C. D. 459). Protests sustained to this extent.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. ET. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Inez E. De Jesus at 1-888-912-1227, or 954-423-7977. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 2 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Wednesday, March 21, 2007 at 2:30 p.m. ET via a telephone conference call. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write Inez E. De Jesus, TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Rd., Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Inez E. De Jesus. Ms. De Jesus can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*.                 

                    The agenda will include the following:                     *Various IRS issues*.                 

Dated: February 20, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. E7-3421 Filed 2-27-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
No. 56378.

protest 134230-K (Baltimore).

#### The American Import Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kit H. Tan, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Interdyne Company;

Based on my  knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report,  fairly present in all material  respects the financial
condition,  results of  operations  and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's   disclosure  controls  and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

The  registrant's  other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal  control over financial  reporting  which are  reasonably  likely to
adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and
report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting.

Dated: September 10, 2007

                                             By: /s/ Kit H. Tan
                                                     Kit H. Tan
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

                                       16
No.51387.

#### Protests 794747-G, etc., of Henry M. Peyser Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance! therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6820
VINCENT JOHN HALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CAPTAIN JOHNNY SAPP; NURSE CORA POUNCEY, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (6:06-cv-02476-RBH) Submitted: November 20, 2007 Decided: November 28, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Vincent John Hall, Appellant Pro Se. C. Heath Ruffner, HARRIS, MCLEOD & RUFFNER, Cheraw, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Vincent John Hall appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hall v. Sapp , No. 6:06-cv-02476-RBH (D.S.C. May 16, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

Yates, Lawrence - AMS

From: Daniel Schaefer <Daniel_Schaefer@cargill.com>

Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 4:11 PM

To: AMS - Beefcarcassrevisions; Yates, Lawrence - AMS

Cc: Glen Dolezal; Bill Thoni; Megan Hobbs; Daniel Genho; Scott Howard

Subject: Docket AMS LPS 14-052 Beef Carcass Revisions

Attachments: 0437_001.pdf

                Cargill comments relative to beef grading attached.

ds

Dan Schaefer

VP By Products

Cargill Beef

151 N. Main

Wichita, KS 67202

316 291 3409

316 304 5686
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

Honorable Robert H, rood 

Comlttee to Inrostlgate Rentals 

EOWO Of RepreSentatiVMI 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: 

th reference to 

the ab:ve matte 

\ attontlon, but 

iw mg attention not before this besn 

nnsneree . 

ladlctloa the Lt&~~aturs 

fuadr, alloostsd to this 

yours very truly
No. 58970.

protest 149854-K (New York).

#### Tombarel Products Corp. *v.*United States,

*341Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8641)

Entry No. H-5.

#### Mrs. Clifford Bennett *v.*United States

(Decided September 7, 1956)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into by and between the respective parties hereto:

> It is stipulated and agreed by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the involved barometer and field glasses, such or similar merchandise was being freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, as follows:

> Barometer_$20 each net packed

> Field Glasses_ $25 each net packed

> It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value, as defined in Section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for merchandise such or similar to that involved herein, at the time of exportation thereof.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that this case may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> Barometer_$20 each net packed

> Field glasses_$25 each net packed

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# —N’ 1- ( NO VA RAD CORPORATION November 3, 2004 Proposal SummaryFor 

### Utah

### Navajo Health System

—

### Montezuma Creek 

### Prices goodfor6

### Months Products NovaRad RAID Level 5, 5-YearOn-SiteArchive NovaRad PACS DICOM ServeriRouterand Telerad Software NovaRad Dual 2 Mp ColorMonitorClinical ReviewWorkstation NovaRad TechnologistWorkstation with Patent CD and DICOM Print Barcode Scanner (lncftided) NovaRad HomeViewer 

### (Induded) NovaStore Emergencyoff-siteback-up (Induded) Connection to CR and US modalities Kodak CR 500With DICOM Printand DICOM Store KodakCR500platesandcassettes(4—14x17ç4—lox 12) Software Obsolescence Installation and Training

— 3 days Au Dell Hardware and Maintenance (Included) Support 24 x 7 (included)
Purchase Price Annual Support (Firstyearfree) $98,250 

### $ 5.460



## APPENDIX DFra: Mtlenn IICdInI—S’irqtal at ti) wflHll43lfl zie—a—s io::I a. [U1 at a; TO: DOROTHY KI4Y CD: DOM4P SIN6ER FC*: 4356513376 Mckesson k4edjcaj-9uricaI X37OD

-- ORDER CONFIRMATrON 

### e/zs/o3 10:08:41 PQ BOCCflt4OE

REF* 00-61538! REP 5 CUST# 0L46870 P.Q DQNNR SINGER ORDER* 18-621819 ORDERED ON: 01/23/03 DI fl/P/i 86-06855 SI-lIP FROM: SHIP TO: Mckesson Medical_Surgical MONTEZUHR CREEK. COMM 14LT14 5301 PEORIR ST. UNIT E CTR/UTflH NflVRJD. HLTh SYS DENVER CD 80239 HIGI-IIIAY 262 MONTEZUMfl CREEK UT 845 PI-4QNE: 800 S2S-aoee Pi-4ONE: 425-651—3291 VENDOR PBV: MPI.MED VENDOR INV 4187722 TITUS P0: S92M31 QLJr1.JTI TY CR0 SHP TTEI4 NUMBER LiM DESCRIPTION PRICE EXTENDED. I 5271-0007200e Efl SPIROMETER STPTER KIT w/ i5S9..oe 1SSS.0g p-a 1/ER PRINTER.SP!RM,8E,RC P nRDER ITEM Ot24T: I P0 SUB TOTPL 1S99.oe STOOC sus TOTPL isgs.ee TRX in .oe PG TQTPL. 1599_Do STO TOTRL isss.ee PpROVflL



## APPENDIX D
Part 2, Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits

One of the goals the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) has envisioned for GTAS is to improve 

the consistency in agency trial balance reporting. This will be accomplished through validations and edits.

The validations ensure that the attributes reported in agencies’ GTAS trial balance submissions are valid for 

the USSGL account. The validations encompass both USSGL level attributes per the USSGL Attribute 

Table and Treasury Account Symbol (TAS) level attributes found in the Super Master Account (SMAF).

Simple validations are those involving one attribute while special validations involve more than one attribute. 

All validations are fatal.

The edits compare the agency trial balances with USSGL rules and with data from authoritative sources 

such as the Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS), Fiscal Service, and the Federal Financing Bank. 

The edits may be either fatal or proposed. Fiscal Service will use the proposed edits only for analytical 

purposes. Fiscal Service disclaims any role or responsibility with the agency auditor relationship concerning 

the GTAS fatal and proposed analytical edits.

The following are the validation and edit reports included in this section:

Section VII Page Number

GTAS Validation Summary Report (VSR) VII VSR - 1

GTAS Validation Detail Report (VDR) VII VDR - 1

GTAS Edits Summary Report (ESR) VII ESR - 1

GTAS Edits Detail Report (EDR) VII EDR - 1

GTAS Closing Edits Report (CER) VII CER - 1

Page 1 of 1
No. 56382.

protests 551511-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### American Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Part 2, Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits

One of the goals the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) has envisioned for GTAS is to improve 

the consistency in agency trial balance reporting. This will be accomplished through validations and edits.

The validations ensure that the attributes reported in agencies’ GTAS trial balance submissions are valid for 

the USSGL account. The validations encompass both USSGL level attributes per the USSGL Attribute 

Table and Treasury Account Symbol (TAS) level attributes found in the Super Master Account (SMAF).

Simple validations are those involving one attribute while special validations involve more than one attribute. 

All validations are fatal.

The edits compare the agency trial balances with USSGL rules and with data from authoritative sources 

such as the Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS), Fiscal Service, and the Federal Financing Bank. 

The edits may be either fatal or proposed. Fiscal Service will use the proposed edits only for analytical 

purposes. Fiscal Service disclaims any role or responsibility with the agency auditor relationship concerning 

the GTAS fatal and proposed analytical edits.

The following are the validation and edit reports included in this section: 

Section VII Page Number

GTAS Validation Summary Report (VSR) VII VSR - 1

GTAS Validation Detail Report (VDR) VII VDR - 1

GTAS Edits Summary Report (ESR) VII ESR - 1

GTAS Edits Detail Report (EDR) VII EDR - 1

GTAS Closing Edits Report (CER) VII CER - 1

Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-137197 on Form S-3 of our report datedFebruary 28, 2008 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of new accounting standards), relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of Interstate Power and Light Company and subsidiaries, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Interstate Power and Light Company for the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

 

Milwaukee, Wisconsin

February 28, 2008
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameriprise Certificate Company (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Abu M. Arif, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Ross P. Palacios, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| /s/   Abu M. Arif                       |                            |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------|
| Name:                                   | Abu   M. Arif                   |   |
| Title:                                  | Chief   Executive Officer       |   |
|                                    | (Principal   Executive Officer) |   |
| Date:  February 27, 2013 |                            |
|                                    |                            |
|                                    |                            |
| /s/   Ross P. Palacios                  |                            |
| Name:                                   | Ross   P. Palacios              |   |
| Title:                                  | Chief   Financial Officer       |   |
|                                    | (Principal   Financial Officer) |   |
| Date:  February 27, 2013 |                            |

 

----