alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10709)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1937.

(Decided April 7, 1964)

*Stem & Shostak*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation entered into between counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for-the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Oourt, as to the-merchandise covered by the entry the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases which is incorporated herein that on the date of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value- or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale-to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, i.n the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States,.*490were the invoice unit values plus f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission on said merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that as to any of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the e.ntry 'the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases which is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521 as provided for in See. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress which is subject to- appraisement under Sec. 402 of’ (the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise op. the dates of exportation involved herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the footwear covered by the entry, the subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, is unlike any articles manufactured or produced in the United States.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal for reap-praisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value was the invoice unit value, plus the f.o.b. charges set out on the invoice, but not including the buying commission on said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4029 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4029

 To prohibit the Department of Defense from offering services through, 
        or maintaining a business relationship with, Tutor.com.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2024

  Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the Department of Defense from offering services through, 
        or maintaining a business relationship with, Tutor.com.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ban Chinese Communist Party Access 
to U.S. Military Students Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE USAGE OF TUTOR.COM.

    (a) Findings.--Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The website Tutor.com is a long-standing provider of 
        tutoring services to members of the United States Armed Forces 
        and their families.
            (2) In January 2022, Primavera Capital Group, a Chinese-
        owned corporation associated with TikTok's parent company, 
        ByteDance, acquired Tutor.com and The Princeton Review (TPR 
        Education LLC) from ST Unitas.
            (3) While providing educational services, Tutor.com 
        collects personal data on users, such as location, internet 
        protocol addresses, and contents of the tutoring sessions.
            (4) As the national security laws of the People's Republic 
        of China require companies to release confidential business and 
        customer data to the Government of the People's Republic of 
        China, the United States is paying to expose the private 
        information of members of the United States Armed Forces and 
        their children to the Chinese Communist Party.
    (b) Prohibition.--
            (1) In general.--The Department of Defense shall--
                    (A) cease offering services through Tutor.com not 
                later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of 
                this Act; and
                    (B) terminate any business relationships with 
                Tutor.com as soon as legally possible.
            (2) Future relationships.--The Department shall not enter 
        into any other relationship with Tutor.com as long as Tutor.com 
        is owned by Primavera Capital Group or any other entity owned 
        or controlled by nationals of the People's Republic of China.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARK JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 05-4988

ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2009, upon consideration of the pleadings

and record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M. Faith

Angell, United States Magistrate Judge, as well as objections submitted by plaintiff, it is

hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 211) is APPROVED and

ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Objections (Docket No. 220) are OVERRULED.

3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction To Enjoin The Merger Between

Rohm and Haas Company And The Dow Chemical Company And The Acquisition

Of Safeco Insurance Company by The Liberty Mutual Group And To Require Full

And Proper Disclosures (Docket No. 184) is DENIED.

4. Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Memorandum (Docket No.

246) is DENIED as moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Louis H. Pollak, J. 

POLLAK, J.

Case 2:05-cv-04988-JKG Document 251 Filed 03/20/09 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE>
                             EXHIBIT 24

                          POWER OF ATTORNEY

    We, the undersigned officers and directors of Ionics, Incorporated (the
"Company"), hereby severally constitute Arthur L. Goldstein and Stephen
Korn, and each of them, to sign for us, and in our names in the capacities
indicated below, the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, and any and all amendments to such
Annual Report, hereby ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be
signed by our attorneys to such Annual Report and any and all amendments
thereto.

    Witness our hands on the respective dates set forth below.
<CAPTION>
     Signature                      Title                    Date
<S>                                 <C>                    <C>

/s/Douglas R. Brown                 Director               February 24, 1998
Douglas R. Brown

/s/William L. Brown                 Director               February 24, 1998
William L. Brown

/s/Arnaud de Vitry d'Avaucourt      Director               February 24, 1998
Arnaud de Vitry d'Avaucourt

/s/Kathleen F. Feldstein            Director               February 24, 1998
Kathleen F. Feldstein

/s/Arthur L. Goldstein              Chairman of the Board  February 24, 1998
Arthur L. Goldstein                 of Directors, Chief
                                    Executive Officer and
                                    President (Principal
                                    Executive Officer)

/s/William E. Katz                  Director               February 24, 1998
William E. Katz

/s/Robert B. Luick                  Director               February 24, 1998
Robert B. Luick

/s/John J. Shields                  Director               February 24, 1998
John J. Shields

/s/Carl S. Sloane                   Director               February 24, 1998
Carl S. Sloane

/s/Daniel I.C. Wang                 Director               February 24, 1998
Daniel I.C. Wang

/s/Mark S. Wrighton                 Director               February 24, 1998
Mark S. Wrighton

/s/Allen S. Wyett                   Director               February 24, 1998
Allen S. Wyett
</TABLE>
/215
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      Section 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Vitasti, Inc.  (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tammy-Lynn McNabb,
      Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: August
      18, 2006


By: /s/
      TAMMY-LYNN MCNABB





Name:
      Tammy-Lynn McNabb


Title:
        Chief Financial Officer
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1796 Prepped by Keeia Richards



# Document

Number: 

# 32 ) IV-H-5 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/20084:20:37

PM Sheet 32 of 107

### 11/26/200 2 15:1 4 919484012 2 

### EC R eeer d 1 i-22-0 2 : Q-,52AM;BA Y APE AOP C :9Z02564140 B FA XTiUNaMXsszo N OmO> OF INPOWUTTO N AN D *B«UUTO0 y AFP-IR S OPRCf ? O fMANAGEMBtf

TAND BUOCE

T NATURA L REflOUftdEfl , EN6M W AN O AetacyUUR E ifUNC H 

### 72 5 17thStreet , NW . Roo m1020 2 Washington . D C 2090 3 Office : 202-398-3084/Fax : 202-395-728 5 

# ___l Date : To ; f-J.-a^U^ I *- • 

# F « * (c____________i P«9«

> 

# !^ t P.2 PAG E 0 3 * 7 3 / " / 4 

### p.01/0 2 

# fl-qo-31 IV/-H-6 8

4 —" 7 irtcludina . thi s cove r sheet . 

### From : »

, Comments i [ ) Ar t Fran s

[ ) Ric h Therou * [ ) Ji m Lait y [ ) Amand a Le e ( S* S * m 

### 7 F a 

### rrel l C ) Brya n Alle n [ ) Margi e AAalanosk i ) Davi d Rcstke r ) Rut h Salomo n ) Edmon d To y


# 7
o . c~l < C2- ' 3^5--7Jtr - 

# ^\V-~^^

p»ns-err>a» B 

# NOV2 2002 E M

zoo ® Vd 3 DI I Dd O 

### 609 9 t> 3 BT 6 XV d T*-T T IIW Z0/ZZ/T 1t

M S I

0 

# j ?

- a ; z i • * % I 201 0 LHilU y Emission s Projection s Unde r Base Cas e an d NS R Rafprn . 440000 0 

# s a .

_ i ( L 1 — 

## • H t c cn

» - v^ C S N D r a a ( S ND • n w

[Bas e Cas e aAeRRetenn;Soen»k> 1 QWRRtrftKntS.»miff2flN^RetaircScanafo 3

SBS & Cas e = Clona l taw wi&afl . NS Rrefon n NSRRefinm . Scenari o 1 =Nodiffl]geinavmlah2i$yan d 0.1 % peryeaiitjiprovKosn,iofcealrat e (EPADtaflRIAfo rHMRRProposal^Appou& tB,Tablel , Increased Mamtensno e Caa e 82. ) NS RReform : Stedari o 1 = Inaeas e i n avaUairiUt y rangingfrom 2.2 % (summer ) to 3.4 % (winter) an

d 3 .2 % imp-uvsraH i i n hea L ut e (EP

A Draf tRI A fo e RMR RProposal , Appendi

x B , Tabl e 3 , Increase d Maintenanc e Cas e 84. ) N n i*nno e in Hvailabilit

vand 0. 1 % pe rvca

r.nroroveinea

l i n tea l rale. (EP

A Draf tRI A forRMRRProposal , Appendi x A. ) 

## -5 S 

## » 2 £N J N D U l

o t n K a m

" 0 G ) m i n
p. 1



# OAR Box 1194 Prepped byCandice Davis



### Document

Number: 

# 51 ) II-F- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 5

Printed 5/13/200810:52:15AM Sheet 51 of 89P. 2



### J" L

### 2 4-1990

Mr . Barr yFelric e Associat e Administrato r fo r Rulemakin g Nationa l Highwa yTraffi c Safet yAdministratio n 40 0 Sevent hStreet , S W. \ i' > Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Dea r Mr . Felrice : Than k yo u fo r you r recen t respons e t o ou r reques t fo r commen t o nth e safet yaspect s o f th e Volkswage niron-base d diese l fue l additiv e system . W e hav e sen t tha t lette r o nt o V W alon g wit hth e enclose d transmitta l letter . EP Aha s als o bee napproache d b yLubrizo l regardin g a simila r additiv e tha t i s base d o ncoppe r rathe r tha niron . I hav e enclose d relevan t portion s o f th e Lubrizo l submitta l alon g wit htw o letter s fro mEP At o Lubrizol , th e latte r o f whic h mention s detail s o f th e Lubrizo l submitta l tha t ma yb e especiall ypertinen t t o you r review . Al l informatio no nth e Lubrizo l additiv e i s bein g place d i npubli c docke t A-90-15 . Lubrizo l ha s addresse d t o som e degre e th e potentia l direc t huma nexposur e t o th e liqui d additiv e a s coul d occu r i na vehicl e cras htha t rupture s th e additiv e storag e tan k (i f tha t approac hwer e use d fo r additiv e addition ) o r durin g fina l vehicl e dismantling , bu t w e woul d b e intereste d i nanyinpu t yo u woul d car e t o giv e o nthi s o r othe r relate d issues . Pleas e not e th e informatio nprovide d i nth e Materia l Safet yDat a Shee t i nAppendi xH o f th e larg e report . I appreciat e anyassistanc e yo u ca nprovid e o nthis . Sincerel yyours , 

### ORIGINA L SIGNE D B Y RICHAR D D.WILSO N Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s Enclosure s cc : Dr . Mar k Levin , Lubrizo l TSS:Harvey:cah:256 5 Plymout hRd.:X-237:06-29-90:ID # 4211 H Reviewe d by : JCABANISS:sbh:X27647:AR-455:7/24/90:Wan g No . 1458 T
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
 MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST VBy:
    /s/ MARLENE DEBELName:
    Marlene Debel*Title:
    Regular Trustee Dated:
May 13, 2010
 *
    
    Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Trust for purposes of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title: Currentindustrial reports. MA327A, Flat glass**
 
1998 | 1999 | 2000
2001 | 2002 | 
 
 
SuDoc Number: C 3.158/34:
Item Number: 0142-A-44(online)
CGP systemNumber: 000556158
 
January 18, 2023
Case No. 6,283.

#### GAYLOR et al. v. DYER.

[5 Cranch, C. C. 461.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1838.

Replevin.

If the vendee of goods on a credit, upon receiving possession of them, agree in writing that they shall remain the property of the vendors until the purchase-money is paid, the vendors may, before payment, maintain replev-in for them as their property against the marshal, who has seized them under an execution against the vendee.

[This was an action at law by Gaylor and Spicer against Edward Dyer.] The marshal had seized an iron chest as the property of one George K. Myers, under a fieri facias against him. The plaintiffs replevied it as their property, and produced in evidence the following writing, given to them by Myers, upon his receiving from them possession of the chest: “Philadelphia, Feb. 15th, 1836. This is to certify that I have this day purchased from C. J. Gaylor & Co., one iron chest for the Union Agency of Washington City, D. C., for which I have given them three notes of one hundred dollars each, payable on the last Friday of May next ensuing, and the said chest is to remain the property of C. J. Gaylor & Co. until the said notes are paid. Geo. K. Myers, for Thos. G. Henderson, Thos. Gibbons. Witness: J. B. rickering.”

Upon the trial. THE COURT (CRANCH, Chief Judge, giving no opinion) instructed the jury, at the motion of Mr. Coxe, for the plaintiffs, that the said instrument of writing, “is evidence of a conditional sale; and that the chest therein mentioned was, under said agreement, the property of plaintiffs until the payment of the notes given by said Myers; and unless the jury shall believe, from the evidence, that said notes are paid, the plaintiffs are entitled to recover.” Verdict for plaintiffs.
(Reap. Dec. 8149)

#### Raphael Weill *&*Co. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 3025, etc.

(Decided July 25, 1952)

*'Lawrence & Tuttle (George B. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Bichard E. FitzGibbon,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliveb, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

> 1) That the merchandise marked *“A”*on the invoices and initialed TLW by Customs Examiner T. L. Walton, involved in the appeals listed in the attached schedule, consists of merchandise exported from France, and appraised at values *456which included the so-called production or unique tax (also known as the French Fiscal Reform Law tax) in the amounts as shown by the invoices and accompanying certificates of pending reappraisement.

> 2) That merchandise such or similar to the imported merchandise, marked “A” in paragraph I, when sold or offered for sale at the time of exportation, in France for home consumption or for exportation to countries other than the United States, in the ordinary course of trade to all purchasers, and in the usual wholesale quantities, was sold or offered for sale at the appraised values herein, less the French Fiscal Reform Tax (Production or Unique tax) as referred to above in paragraph 1 and as added by the importer on entry, plus 1.01 percent Armament tax when not included in the appraised value, packed, and that the export value was no higher.

> 3) That all other claims of the plaintiffs, as raised by these appeals, are hereby abandoned, and that upon this stipulation these cases are submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended l>y section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoices by the items marked “A” and initialed TLW by Customs Examiner T. L. Walton, and that such values were the appraised values, less the French fiscal reform tax (production or unique tax) as added by the importers on entry, plus 1.01 per centum armament tax when not included in the appraised value, packed.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 36 (Friday, February 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES


National Endowment for the Arts; Arts Advisory Panel

    Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act 
(Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of 
the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be 
held by teleconference from the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending time is 
approximate):

Folk & Traditional Arts (application review): March 5, 2007. This 
meeting, from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. eastern standard time, will be closed.

    The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel 
review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial 
assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities 
Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to 
the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of 
April 8, 2005, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to 
subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code.
    Further information with reference to these meetings can be 
obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel 
Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or 
call 202/682-5691.

    Dated: February 20, 2007.
Kathy Plowitz-Worden,
Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts.
 [FR Doc. E7-3200 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
----

RESERVE LISTS (1)

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/4/04

ADMINISTRATORS (A*7)

of Cypriot, Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovenian and Slovakian citizenship, in the field of European Public Administration

(2006/C 181 A/01)

CYPRUS

Merit group 1:

Merit group 2:

CZECH REPUBLIC

Merit group 1:

Merit group 2:

ESTONIA

HUNGARY

LITHUANIA

LATVIA

MALTA

POLAND

Merit group 1:

Merit group 2:

Merit group 3:

SLOVENIA

Merit group 1:

Merit group 2:

SLOVAKIA

Merit group 1:

Merit group 2:

The reserve lists will be valid until 31 December 2007 and may be extended.

----

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request that her/his name not be published.

----