alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                            755
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   755
<CGS>                                            2,243
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,243
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (14,369)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (14,369)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (14,369)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.39)
        

</TABLE>
-                          Home                     
-                          Data Products                     
-                     Organic Production                

# Organic Production

Note: Updates to this data product are discontinued.

ERS collected data from USDA-accredited State and private certification groups to calculate the extent of certified organic farmland acreage and livestock in the United States. These are presented in tables showing the change in U.S. organic acreage and livestock numbers from 1992 to 2011 (see the National tables section). Data for 1997 and 2000-11 are presented by State and commodity (see the State tables section).

Organic production tables are in .xls format. Each workbook contains multiple years of data in worksheets that are accessed through tabs. State-level tables cover the years 1997 and 2000-2011 (no data are available for 2009). National-level tables also include data from earlier years.

Errata: On October 24, 2013, table 3 was revised. The correct 2011 value for certified organic peanut acres was 5,066.

-  National Tables 
-  State-Level Tables 

- Overview
- Documentation
- Glossary

-  Environmental Quality 
-  Fertilizers & Pesticides 
-  Crop & Livestock Practices 
-  Climate Change 
-  Organic Agriculture 

**Last updated:** Monday, September 30, 2019

**For more information, contact:**Website Administrator
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OPTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS,

a California corporation,

NO. CIV. S-04-482 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

MARK FUKUHARA, an individual;

DOUGLAS BURLAND, an individual;

MICHAEL GERKOVICH, an individual;

STEVEN LEACH, an individual;

EDMUND PETERSON, an individual;

DAN SALOMON, an individual; JOE

SILVA, an individual; DALE BRODSKY,

an individual; EYEPICTURES, INC., a

Missouri corporation; JUSTICE

OPTHALMICS, INC., a Tennessee

corporation; ZETA DEVELOPMENT LABS,

INC., a Tennessee corporation; and

JOHNNY JUSTICE, JR., an individual,

Defendants.

 /

Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to amend the 

first amended complaint. The matter is currently scheduled to

be heard on February 13, 2006 on the court’s Law and Motion

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 196 Filed 01/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

calendar. However, pursuant to a court order filed on April 26,

2005, the Pretrial Conference is currently scheduled for

February 6, 2006.

Further, plaintiff has moved to amend under Fed. R. Civ. P. 

15(a). Rule 15 does not provide the standard by which to

consider a motion to amend at this time. Because a scheduling

order has been issued in this case, plaintiff’s motion to amend

is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b), not Rule

15. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604 (9th

Cir. 1992). 

Consequently, the court hereby ORDERS as follows: 

1. Plaintiff is ordered to re-file the motion to amend

under Rule 16(b) no later than January 13, 2006 at 8:00 a.m.;

2. Defendant is ordered to file an opposition brief or a

statement of non-opposition by January 20, 2006 at 8:00 a.m.;

3. No reply brief will be entertained;

4. After the filing of the opposition or statement of nonopposition, the matter will stand submitted unless the court

determines that oral argument is appropriate; and

5. The Law and Motion hearing date scheduled for February

13, 2006 in the above-captioned case is VACATED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: January 10, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 196 Filed 01/11/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE 1>
                                                                              
                                                            EXHIBIT 3


                  NAVISTAR INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION CORP.
                               AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  -------------------------------------------

                     ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BY-LAWS


     The following documents of Navistar International Transportation Corp.
are incorporated herein in those executed and conformed copies of this report
provided to the Securities and  Exchange Commission, the New York Stock
Exchange, the Chicago Stock Exchange and the Pacific Stock Exchange.

  3.1  Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Navistar International
       Transportation Corp. effective October 27, 1995, filed as
       Exhibit 3.1 on Annual Report on Form 10-K dated October 31, 1995,
       which was filed on January 26, 1996, Commission File No. 1-5236.

  3.2  The By-Laws of Navistar International Transportation Corp. effective
       February 14, 1995, filed as Exhibit 3.2 on Annual Report on Form 10-K
       dated October 31, 1995 which was filed on January 26, 1996, on
       Commission File No. 1-5236. 


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


                                  E-1
exhibit10-1.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    Note

     

    $34,000,000.00                                                                                                                                                   June 26, 2008

     

                            New
York, New York

     

    


    The
undersigned (“Borrower”), for value
received, promises to pay to the order of FOURTH THIRD LLC (“Lender”) at the
principal office of FOURTH THIRD LLC (the “Agent”) in New York
City, New York the principal sum of $34,000,000, representing the aggregate
unpaid amount of the Loan made to Borrower by Lender pursuant to the Credit
Agreement referred to below, such principal amount to be payable on the dates
set forth in the Credit Agreement.

     

    Borrower
further promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the Loan from
the date of such Loan until such Loan is Paid in Full, payable at the rate(s)
and at the time(s) set forth in the Credit Agreement.  Payments of
both principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States
of America to the deposit account located in New York City and identified in the
Credit Agreement.

     

    This Note
evidences indebtedness incurred under, and is subject to the terms and
provisions of, a certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June
__, 2008 (as heretofore amended, and as further amended, supplemented, restated
or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”;
terms not otherwise defined herein are used herein as defined in the Credit
Agreement), among Borrower, the other Loan Parties named therein, the financial
institutions (including Lender) party thereto from time to time and Agent, to
which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms and
provisions under which this Second Amended and Restated Note may or must be paid
prior to its due date or its due date accelerated.

     

    This Note is made under and governed by
the laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be
performed entirely within such State.

    


    


    [signature
page follows]

     


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    


     

    NEW EARTH
LNG, LLC

    


    


    By: /s/ Kevin Markey    

    Title:  President
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26 Plaintiff’s first motion was denied by order filed June 28, 2005. 1

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

STEVEN A. MARTIN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0756 LKK JFM P

vs.

CHERYL K. PLILER,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 31, 2005, plaintiff filed his second motion for the appointment of

counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require 1

counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court,

490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the

voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d

1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In

the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s

second motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Case 2:04-cv-00756-LKK -JFM Document 39 Filed 09/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

On September 12, 2005, defendants filed a request for a third extension of time to

serve responses to interrogatories and requests for admissions. In the request, defendants

represent that the responses were to be served on that day. Good cause appearing, the request

will be granted and responses served September 12, 2005 will be deemed timely. 

Finally, on September 21, 2005, defendants filed a request for an extension of

time to file dispositive motions in this matter. Defendants seek an extension of time from

September 23, 2005 to November 7, 2005 to file a dispositive motion. Good cause appearing,

defendants’ request will be granted. No further extensions of time to file such motions will be

granted.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s August 31, 2005 motion for the appointment of counsel is denied;

2. Defendants’ September 12, 2005 request for an extension of time is granted;

3. Defendants’ responses to interrogatories and requests for admissions are

deemed timely as served on September 12, 2005;

4. Defendants’ September 21, 2005 request for an extension of time to file a

dispositive motion is granted;

5. The parties are granted until November 7, 2005 to file and serve dispositive

motions and no further extensions of this deadline will be granted.

DATED: September 21, 2005. 

12/kf

mart0756.31a

Case 2:04-cv-00756-LKK -JFM Document 39 Filed 09/22/05 Page 2 of 2
Page 1 of 3

Bulletin No. 2023-08

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to Bulletin No. 2023-04, U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury 

Financial Manual (TFM) Supplement

1. Purpose: This bulletin notifies agencies that Part 1 and Part 2 of the USSGL Supplement have been 

revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 and FY 2024. 

2. Summary of Changes: The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. 

3. Changes by Part/Section/File: 

Part 1 - FY 2023 Reporting changes to files in Sections II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII:

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting 

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2023 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Balance Sheet

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule
Page 2 of 3

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2023 Reporting

 Reclassified Statement of Net Cost

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2023 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

 Edits Closing

Part 2 - FY 2024 Reporting changes to files in Sections I, II, III, IV, V, VI, and VII:

Section I: Chart of Accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2024 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Balance Sheet

 Statement of Net Cost

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2024 Reporting

 Reclassified Statement of Net Cost

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2024 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

 Edits Closing
Page 3 of 3

4. Effective Date: 

Part 1 requirements for FY 2023 are effective immediately. 

Part 2 requirements for FY 2024 are effective immediately. 

5. Inquiries: 

Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Chris Beck

Director, General Ledger and Intragovernmental Transaction Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Email: USSGLTeam@fiscal.treasury.gov

Date: June 7, 2023
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1244 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1244

To extend the authorization of appropriations for additional funds for 
                   the essential air service program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2017

Mr. Schumer (for Ms. Hirono (for herself, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Schatz, and 
Ms. Murkowski)) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the authorization of appropriations for additional funds for 
                   the essential air service program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keeping Our Commitment to Essential 
Air Service Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) The intent of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 
        (Public Law 95-504; 92 Stat. 1705) was to benefit consumers by 
        expanding competition and allowing United States air carriers 
        greater ability to decide which destinations to serve and set 
        pricing on airfares.
            (2) Congress recognized that the intended benefits of 
        deregulation may not reach all small communities, so the 
        Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 also authorized the essential 
        air service program so that small communities would not lose 
        air service or consumer choice if air carriers chose to serve 
        the larger and more profitable markets.
            (3) According to the Department of Transportation, more 
        than 170 communities in 35 States were served by the essential 
        air service program in fiscal year 2016.
            (4) Without the essential air service program, air service 
        would be cost prohibitive in many smaller communities, 
        especially in Alaska and Hawaii where air travel is often the 
        only mode of transportation.
            (5) The essential air service program provides small 
        communities greater consumer choice and a lifeline to essential 
        goods and services such as medical care, increases economic 
        opportunity, and attracts visitors and new businesses.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL 
              FUNDS FOR ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE PROGRAM.

    Section 41742(a)(2) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
striking ``and 2017'' and inserting ``through 2022''.
                                 <all>
```
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Import User Identity to OTCnet

To import OTCnet user identity to OTCnet, complete the following steps:

1. From the OTCnet Home page>Administration>Manage Users, select the Import OTCnet 

User Identity tab as shown in Figure 1. 

Figure 1: Import OTCnet User Identity 

2. On the Import OTCnet User Identity page, enter one or more email addresses of the 

users (separated by a space, comma, semicolon, or a new line) whose identity will be 

imported. 

3. Then select the Import User button as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Enter User’s Email Address to Import User 
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• If you select the Import User button without entering an email address, an error 

message will display, notifying you that at least one email address should be 

entered.

• When you select the Cancel button, you will be returned to the homepage.

4. A confirmation page displays alerting you that the user identity has been imported and/or if 

there are errors as shown in Figure 3. 

5. Select the OK button on the confirmation page to return to the OTCnet homepage or the Fix 

Errors and Reimport button to navigate back to the importing OTCnet user page to fix the 

errors.

Figure 3: Import User Identity Confirmation Screen

Error messages may include:

• The email address already exists in the OTCnet database.

• The email address has an invalid format. Ensure all email addresses are properly 

formatted and separated by a space, comma, semicolon, or a new line. 

• The email address is greater than 128 characters and cannot be imported.

Ensure that you enter the correct email address for the user. If you import an incorrect 

email address, another entry in the database will be created and the user will not be able 

to access the application.

Application Tip

Application Tip
Order filed October 2, 2014. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00715-CV

____________

MARSHAUN ROBINSON, Appellant

V.

TEXAS BOARD PARDONS AND PAROLES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-34153

ORDER

According to information provided to this court, appellant filed a notice of 

appeal from the trial court’s order signed August 14, 2014, sustaining a contest to 

his pauper’s oath. It appears that no final judgment has been signed in this case, 

and the order being appealed is interlocutory. The clerk’s record has not been filed 

in this appeal. Appellant filed a motion to appeal as indigent. 

To determine our jurisdiction over this appeal, we issue the following order for a 

partial clerk’s record.
We order the Harris County District Clerk to file a partial clerk’s record with the 

clerk of this court on or before October 31, 2014, containing a final judgment signed by 

the trial court. If the requested document is not part of the case file, the district clerk 

is directed to file a certified statement that the document is not part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 99.1

THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION IS PROVIDED BY THE UNDERSIGNED CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC. ON THE BASIS
OF SUCH OFFICER'S KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                /s/Brad A. Luecke
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name:  Brad A. Luecke
                                                Title:  President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                                Date:  May 15, 2003


                                                /s/Daniel R. Kadolph
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name:  Daniel R. Kadolph
                                                Title: Senior Vice President and
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                                Date:  May 15, 2003







A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UPON REQUEST. THIS CERTIFICATION ACCOMPANIES
THE REPORT AND SHALL NOT BE TREATED AS HAVING BEEN FILED AS PART OF THE REPORT.
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-12	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2021