alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES BRITTINGHAM,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0037 LKK DAD P

vs.

HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, et al., ORDER REQUIRING

Defendants. STATUS REPORT

 /

This matter has now been at issue for sufficient time that it should be ready to be

set for trial. Plaintiff and defendants shall therefore each submit to the court and serve by mail

on all other parties the following status report:

1. Whether this matter is ready for trial and, if not, why not;

2. Whether additional discovery is deemed necessary and, if so, the nature and

scope of the discovery and the time needed in which to complete it;

3. Whether a pretrial motion is contemplated and, if so, the type of motion and

the time needed to file the motion and complete the time schedule set forth in Local Rule 78-

230(m);

4. A narrative statement of the facts that will be offered by oral or documentary

evidence at trial;

Case 2:04-cv-00037-LKK -DAD Document 45 Filed 10/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

5. A list of all exhibits to be offered into evidence at the trial of the case;

6. A list of the names and addresses of all witnesses the party intends to call;

7. A summary of the anticipated testimony of any incarcerated witnesses;

8. The time estimated for trial;

9. Whether either party still requests trial by jury; and

 10. Any other matter, not covered above, which the party desires to call to the

attention of the court.

The parties are informed that they may, if all consent, have this case tried by a

United States Magistrate Judge while preserving their right to appeal to the United States Court

of Appeals. An appropriate form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge is attached. Any party

choosing to consent may complete the form and return it to the clerk of this court. Neither the

magistrate judge nor the district judge handling the case will be notified of the filing of a consent

form unless all parties to the action have consented.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s status report shall be filed and served within thirty days from the

date of service of this order. Defendants’ status report shall be filed within thirty days thereafter. 

The parties are advised that failure to file a status report in accordance with this order may result

in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of the action or preclusion of issues or

witnesses.

2. The clerk of the court is directed to mail to all parties the form “Consent to

Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge,” together with the instant order.

DATED: October 26, 2005.

DAD:lg

britt0037.40

Case 2:04-cv-00037-LKK -DAD Document 45 Filed 10/26/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSEPH MARINO, :

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

KENT LINE INTERNATIONAL, et al., : No. 02-4488

Defendants. :

 ORDER

AND NOW, this day of May, 2003, it is hereby ORDERED that:

This Court’s Revised Scheduling Order of February 21, 2003, shall be amended

as follows:

1. Paragraph 3 is amended to read: “All fact discovery shall be completed by

July 14, 2003. Defendant Kent Line International shall make the Chief

Mate available for deposition within two weeks of his return from sea, but

in no event later than the close of formal discovery on July 14, 2003.”

2. Paragraph 4 is amended to read: “Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 26(a)(2), Plaintiff’s experts’ identities and their reports

(including any curricula vitae) shall be disclosed by July 21, 2003;

Defendants’ experts’ identities and their reports (including any curricula

vitae) shall be disclosed by July 28, 2003.”

3. Paragraph 5 is amended to read: “Any motions for summary judgment

shall be filed by August 4, 2003. Responses to any motions for summary

judgment shall be filed within the time permitted under Local Rule of

Civil Procedure 7.1(c). Counsel are expected to communicate with each

other and, if possible, to produce a joint appendix for submission to the

court.”

BY THE COURT:

___________________

Berle M. Schiller, J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04488-BMS Document 35 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 53522.

protests 138071-K, etc. (New York).

#### Abels Wasserberg & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-04557-NS Document 26-10 Filed 01/04/07 Page 20 of 20
Before the Third Division,

April 6, 1955

No. 58935.

protests 202939-K and 186694-K (San Francisco).

#### Schenley Import Corp. and Hiram Walker & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case 2:04-cv-00021-FCD-DAD   Document 50    Filed 09/22/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-21T11:37:46-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
# EXHIBIT 32.2

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

# 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

# SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Infodata Systems, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Norman F. Welsch, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2)    
The information contained in the Report
          fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
          operations of the Company.

| | By:  /s/ Norman F. WelschNorman F. Welsch Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  March 31, 2005
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

OCT 6, 2011

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 11-11210

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 6:10-cr-83-GAP-DAB-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD A. MURDOCH,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(October 6, 2011)

Before HULL, PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

H. Kyle Fletcher, appointed counsel for Richard Murdoch in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct.
1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Murdoch’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.

2
EXHIBIT 21
  NAME
    
    STATE OF INCORPORATION/ORGANIZATIONOdyssey HealthCare Holding Company
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare Operating A, LP
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare Operating B, LP
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare Management, LP
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare GP, LLC
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare LP, LLC
    
    DEHospice of the Palm Coast, Inc.
    
    FLOdyssey HealthCare Fort Worth, LLC
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare Detroit, LLC
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Collier County, Inc.
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Manatee County, Inc.
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Northwest Florida, Inc
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Hillsborough County, Inc.
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Marion County, Inc
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Pinellas County, Inc
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Northwest Florida, Inc
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Austin, LLC
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Augusta, LLC
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Savannah, LLC
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Kansas City, LLC
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of St. Louis, LLC
    
    DEVistaCare of Boston, LLC
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of South Texas, LLC
    
    DEOdyssey HealthCare of Flint, LLC
    
    DEVistaCare, Inc.
    
    DEVista Hospice Care, Inc.
    
    DEFHI Health Systems, Inc.
    
    DECareNation, Inc.
    
    DEVistaCare USA, Inc.
    
    DEFHI GP, Inc.
    
    TXFHI LP, Inc.
    
    NVFamily Hospice, Ltd.
    
    TXFHI Mangement, Ltd.
    
    TX
DASZKAL BOLTON MANELA DEVLIN & CO.
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                   A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS

       2401 N.W. BOCA RATON BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33431
                   TELEPHONE (561) 367-1040 FAX (561) 750-3236



JEFFREY A. BOLTON, CPA, P.A.                    MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE
MICHAEL I. DASZKAL, CPA, P.A.                    OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ROBERT A. MANELA, CPA, P.A.
TIMOTHY R. DEVLIN. CPA, P.A.
MICHAEL S. KRIDEL, CPA, P.A.



               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT


We hereby consent to the use of our audit report dated September 11, 2000 in the
Form 10-KSB of AmeriNet Group.com, Inc and subsidiaries, for the year ended June
30, 2000.



    /s/ Daszkal Bolton Manela Devlin & Company


Boca Raton, Florida
October 13, 2000

                                      167
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- News
- Fiscal Service Releases Playbook to Help Agencies Digitally Transform Their Business Processes

# Fiscal Service Releases Playbook to Help Agencies Digitally Transform Their Business Processes

May 26, 2021 

The Bureau of the Fiscal Service has released a playbook to help government agencies automate and  digitize their business processes.  The  playbook is part of Fiscal’s newest initiative, Digital  End-to-End Efficiency, aimed at streamlining the government’s financial  processes through the strategic adoption of technology. 

“People expect to engage with the government the same way they  engage with one another, through digitally enabled platforms,” said Adam  Goldberg, Acting Assistance Commissioner, Office of Financial Innovation and  Transformation.  “The Digital End-to-End  Efficiency framework is different from many digital transformation efforts  because it emphasizes both the customer and delivery experiences to identify the  highest priority opportunities for improvement.”

The Digital End-to-End Efficiency playbook contains a set of easy  to follow tools and instructions for agencies to follow and learn:

- How to select a business process to maximize cost savings;
- How to quickly identify areas that present the greatest  opportunities for automation and digitization; and 
- How to choose the right solution(s) for implementation 

The playbook was developed in coordination with  several Federal agencies who piloted the framework. The FIT office is looking  for other Federal agencies interested in partnering to evaluate their financial  management end-to-end processes. 

One can learn more about the playbook through  this introductory video             and blog. The complete playbook is also available for download. 

About FIT

FIT is responsible for leading the transformation of financial management to reduce costs, increase transparency, and improve delivery of agencies' missions by  operating at scale, relying on common standards, and using state-of-the-art  technology. 

About Bureau of the Fiscal Service

The Fiscal Service is a bureau of the United States Department of the Treasury.  Their mission is to promote the financial integrity and operational efficiency  of the federal government through exceptional accounting, financing, collections,  payments, and shared services.

Last modified 12/07/23
Before the First Division,

July 27, 1945

No. 50380.

#### Petition 6419-R of Deimel Linen Mesh System Co. (San Francisco).

*243Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial the customhouse broker testified that he prepared the entry which covered two invoices of shipments of handkerchiefs; that the undervaluation occurred only in connection with the entry of the merchandise covered by one of the invoices, the prices appearing thereon being made up of material and labor costs; that both prior to and after entry the president •of the petitioner company had conferences with the customs officials with respect to the value of the merchandise; and that the appraiser indicated that he considered the invoice values, proposed by the petitioner, too low by 10 percent, attributable to higher labor cost. The president, in order to establish a test case, caused the merchandise to be entered at the invoice values, which were advanced by the appraiser. An appeal to reappraisement was thereupon filed, but, after further consideration, same was abandoned. The court held that the undervaluation on entry in this case was the result of an honest difference of opinion between the importer and customs officers and that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or to misrepresent the facts of the ■case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Page 1 of 6 

## Inspection Alert!

Twin Commander Aircraft LLC

December 2, 2009

Models Affected: 685, 690, 690A and 690B

Reason for Publication: To provide input to the FAA in response to the

Airworthiness Concern Sheet of November 27, 2009

Subject: Inspection of the 310704-1 and -2 Pi cture Window Upper Frame Channel,

the 310384-125 and -65 Left. And Right Hand Wing Main Spar Frame

Support Channels and the 310704-159 Aft Pressure Bulkhead Web

Inspection Instructions:

1. Remove interior components as necessary to gain access to the upper picture

window frame channels and the aft pre ssure bulkhead at fuselage station 178.81.

2. Remove insulation and sound proofing materials for access to structure.

3. Remove the 310736-120 Doors for access to the upper picture window frame

channels.

4. Remove the 310736-143, -144, -85, -86, -113 and -114 Inner Skins for access to

the upper picture window frame channels a nd the left hand and right hand main

spar frame support channels.

Note: It is acceptable to only remove a suffi cient number of fasteners as to allow for

careful repositioning of the inner sk ins clear of the inspection areas.

5. Carefully remove all sealant using n on metallic tools and/or commercially

available sealant removal solvents from the areas to be inspected. (Ref: Figure 1,

2, 3 and 4 for Inspection Area Detail)

6. Inspect the areas illustrated in Figures 1 through 4 for cracks, corrosion and any

other damage.

7. If damage is found, contact Geoffrey Pe nce at Twin Commander LLC for further

inspection instructions.Page 2 of 6 8. Report findings to:

Twin Commander Aircraft LLC

18933 59 th Avenue N.E. Suite 115

Arlington, WA 98223

Attn. Geoffrey Pence

Technical Service Manager

(360) 435-9797 X221

gpence@twincommander.com Vince Massey

Aerospace Engineer

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office

Department ANM-130S

1601 Lind Ave. S.W.

Renton, WA 98057-3356

(425) 917-6475

Vince.massey@faa.gov

Please provide in your report the aircraft se rial number, total airframe time and

airframe time since a lower wing spar cap replacement if applicable.

Figure 1

Right Hand Side Shown With Window Channel Removed

310704-2 Picture Window Upper Channel Location

310384-125 Channel and 310412-24 Shear ClipPage 3 of 6 Figure 2Page 4 of 6 Figure 3Page 5 of 6 Figure 4Page 6 of 6
USSGL Account 599700 Custodial Modification Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

USSG

L Acct. USSGL Account Title

Anticipated

Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/ End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Year

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Nonfed

Trading 

Prtnr

Trading 

Partner 

Main

PY

Adj DEFC

Pgm 

Rpt 

Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account 

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

599700 Financing Sources Transferred In From Custodial Statement 

Collections

N P C E D/C D/E A E/T/X F ### /#### CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

Section IV

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Attribute Table

U S S G L A C C O U N T USSGL ATTRIBUTES B U L K F I L E A T T R I B U T E S T A S A T T R I B U T E S

IRC Handout Draft April 21, 2021
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

Line 

No.

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Begin/ 

End

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Cust/ 

Noncust

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Reporting 

Type Code

Addl. 

Info.

15

15 599700 Financing Sources Transferred In From Custodial Statement Collections E E/T A D E/U

22

22 599700 Financing Sources Transferred In From Custodial Statement Collections E E/T A E E/U

Other (+/-)

Nonexchange revenue

Section V

USSGL Crosswalk - Statement of Changes in Net Position

Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

IRC Handout Draft April 21, 2021
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

Line 

No.

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Begin/ 

End

Fed/ 

NonFed

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Reporting 

Type Code

Addl. 

Info.

6.8

6.8 599700 Financing Sources Transferred In From Custodial Statement Collections E F E/T D/E E/U

Collections transferred into a TAS Other Than the General Fund of the U.S. Government - Nonexchange (RC 

Section VI

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Statement Of Operations and Changes in Net Position

Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

IRC Handout Draft April 21, 2021
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

D. DUSTIN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0672 GEB JFM P

vs.

R. TOWNSEND, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file a second amended complaint. 

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's November 7, 2005 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a

second amended complaint. 

DATED: November 28, 2005.

/mp:001

dust0672.36(1)

Case 2:04-cv-00672-GEB -JFM Document 33 Filed 11/29/05 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

February 13, 1952

No. 56374.

protests 77447-K and 15893-K (New York).

#### Mon Fong Wo Co. and Tuck High & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of celluloid chopsticks composed of synthetic resin similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 54617. The claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARIO WOOTEN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0816 DFL JFM P

vs.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 22, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

Case 2:04-cv-00816-DFL -JFM Document 37 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 22, 2005 are adopted in full; and 

2. Defendants' April 11, 2005 motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed.

DATED: 9/14/2005

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00816-DFL -JFM Document 37 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2