alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50313 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JUAN MORA-RIVAS, also known as Juan Sandoval-Martinez Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:06-CR-73-ALL
Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Juan Mora-Rivas raises arguments that are foreclosed by A lmendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. U nited States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 5, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT&"Arial,Regular"&10&K000000	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/5/17
Docket No. FAA-2012-0142

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Helen Tsai 613-952-

4362

11/15/10 Sent email.

Bombardier Chester Liburski

(514) 855-5001

ext. 29036

11/15/10 Sent email.

Regional Airline 

Association

Connie Arnold

202-367-1252

11/30/10 Sent email.
No. 57997.

protests 71935-K, etc. (New York).

#### M. Tarlow *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those thp subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust Ct. 266, C. D. 1480;, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D 1480, *supra.*
No. 66311.

#### Paul E. Sernau, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/22640, etc. (New York).

*404Opinion by

Moulison, *3.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic back seratchers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 161, C.D. 2218), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALFRED COE,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART,

Commissioner of the Social Security

Administration.

Defendant.

Civil Action No. 05-3590

ORDER

June 26, 2006

AND NOW, upon review of the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United

States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, dated February 22, 2006 (Docket # 10), to

which no objections have been filed, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1) The R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2) The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Docket # 6) is DENIED; and

3) The defendant’s motion for summary judgment (Docket # 8) is GRANTED.

 BY THE COURT:

/s/ Louis H. Pollak

___________________________

Pollak, J.

Case 2:05-cv-03590-LP Document 11 Filed 06/27/06 Page 1 of 1
# sec4_attribtable_2021

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-12	&"Arial,Bold"&9IV AT - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2021
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4114 

To authorize a higher Federal share for emergency relief funds for the 

reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key Bridge located in Baltimore 

City and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland, that collapsed 

on March 26, 2024, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11 (legislative day, APRIL 10), 2024 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 

Public Works 

A BILL 

To authorize a higher Federal share for emergency relief 

funds for the reconstruction of the Francis Scott Key 

Bridge located in Baltimore City and Baltimore and 

Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland, that collapsed on 

March 26, 2024, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Baltimore Bridge Re5 sponse Invests and Delivers Global Economic Relief Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘Baltimore BRIDGE Relief Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4114 IS

1 SEC. 2. FINDING. 

2 Congress finds that, in accordance with section 

3 668.105(e) of title 23, Code of Federal Regulations (or 

4 a successor regulation), any compensation for damages or 

5 insurance proceeds, including interest, recovered by a 

6 State, a political subdivision of a State, or a toll authority 

7 for repair, including reconstruction, of the bridge de8 scribed in section 3 in response to the damage described 

9 in that section should be used on receipt to reduce liability 

10 on the repair, including reconstruction, of that bridge 

11 from the emergency fund authorized under section 125 of 

12 title 23, United States Code. 

13 SEC. 3. FEDERAL SHARE FOR CERTAIN EMERGENCY RE14 LIEF PROJECTS. 

15 Notwithstanding subsection (e) of section 120 of title 

16 23, United States Code, the Federal share for emergency 

17 relief funds made available under section 125 of that title 

18 to respond to damage caused by the cargo ship Dali to 

19 the Francis Scott Key Bridge located in Baltimore City 

20 and Baltimore and Anne Arundel Counties, Maryland, in21 cluding reconstruction of that bridge and its approaches, 

22 shall be 100 percent. 

23 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

24 This Act shall take effect as if enacted on March 26, 

25 2024. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Louis D. Levinson, 

International Financial Group, 

Inc., Guilford Specialty 

Group, Inc., Guilford 

Insurance Company, and The 

Burlington Insurance 

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 31, 2015

No. 04-14-00606-CV

ARGO GROUP US, Inc., Colony Management Services, Inc., Colony Insurance Company, 

Colony National Insurance Company, Colony Specialty Insurance Company, Colony Agency 

Services, Inc., and Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.,

Appellants

v.

Louis D. LEVINSON, International Financial Group, Inc., Guilford Specialty Group, Inc., 

Guilford Insurance Company, and The Burlington Insurance Company,

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-09550

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees' motion for leave to file surreply to appellants' reply to appellees' response to 

appellants' motion for rehearing is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 31st day of March, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Order entered December 7, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05-15-01372-CV

CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON AND STEVENS TRANSPORT, INC., Appellants

V.

GLENDY W. TOLBERT, JR., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-01126-D



### ORDER Before Justices Bridges, Lang-Miers, and Schenck

Based on the Court’s opin ion of this date, we DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to issue

the mandate INSTANTER

.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES
JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JACQUELINE DRINKS, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 02-CV-4352

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION :

MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, :

:

Defendant. :

DEFENDANT, LOCKHEED MARTIN 

CORPORATION MANAGEMENT & DATA 

SYSTEM’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant, Lockheed Martin Corporation, Management & Data Systems, hereby

moves this Court to enter Summary Judgment pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure for the reasons set forth in Defendant’s Memorandum of Law in

Support thereof.

Respectfully submitted,

SIDNEY L. GOLD & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

__________________________________

SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

Identification No.: 21374

Eleven Penn Center - Suite 515

1835 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 569-1999

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:02-cv-04352-JF Document 6 Filed 09/10/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 64105.

protests 122247-K, etc. (Indianapolis).

#### The Old Quaker Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
----

OPINION No 4/2006

on the draft Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities

(pursuant to Article 248(4), second subparagraph, EC)

(2006/C 273/02)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE COURT OF AUDITORS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community and, in particular Articles 248(4) and 279 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community and, in particular Articles 160C(4) and 183 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (1) and, in particular Article 184 thereof, which provides for a review of the Regulation every three years,

Having regard to the Court's Opinion No 10/2005 (2) on the draft Council Regulation amending the latter (3),

Having regard to the Court's Opinion No 2/2004 on the ‘single audit’ model (and a proposal for a Community internal control framework) (4),

Having regard to the Court's Opinion No 2/2002 on an amended proposal for a Council Regulation on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (5),

Having regard to a modified Proposal for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (6),

Having regard to the Council's request for an opinion on this proposal, which was submitted to the Court of Auditors on 26 June 2006,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING OPINION:

INTRODUCTION

EXCEPTIONS TO BUDGETARY PRINCIPLES

PRINCIPLE OF EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT INTERNAL CONTROL

METHODS OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BUDGET: COMPLIANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF THE FINANCIAL REGULATION

ACCOUNTABILITY OF FINANCIAL ACTORS

Authorising officer

Accounting officer

CONDITIONS FOR SIGNING CONTRACTS AWARDED BY THE COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONS ON THEIR OWN ACCOUNT

GRANTS AND SUBVENTIONS

EXTERNAL ACTIONS

REPORT ON BUDGETARY AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

TIMETABLE FOR THE PRESENTATION AND AUDIT OF THE ACCOUNTS

This Opinion was adopted by the Court of Auditors in Luxembourg at its meeting of 14 September 2006.

For the Court of Auditors

Hubert WEBER

President

----

(1)OJ L 248, 16.9.2002. Corrigendum published in OJ L 25, 30.1.2003.

(2)OJ C 13, 18.1.2006.

(3)  COM(2005) 181 final of 3 May 2005.

(4)OJ C 107, 30.4.2004.

(5)OJ C 92, 17.4.2002.

(6)  COM(2006) 213 final of 18 May 2006.

(7)  Directive 2004/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 (OJ L 134, 30.4.2004).

(8)  See proposed Articles 3, 30a, 53b, 54, 56 and 60.

(9)  See proposed Articles 3 and 28(a).

(10)  See proposed Articles 53b(2)(d), 53c(3), 53d(3) and 56(1)(f).

(11)  Opinion No 10/2005, paragraphs 19, 20, 22 and 24.

(12)OJ C 203, 25.8.2006.

----

ANNEX

Article 60, paragraph 7

----
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-10 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 5

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 55 Att. 9

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-10 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-10 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-10 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-10 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 5 of 5
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                      31,468,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            31,820,000
<PP&E>                                       7,204,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,768,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              42,293,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,209,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 86,714,000
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (53,835,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                42,293,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,818,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,609,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             242,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,833,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,833,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,833,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (10.73)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (10.73)


</TABLE>
Addendum to Loan and Security Agreement



 Exhibit 10.3 
 INVENTORY AGREEMENT 
 ADDENDUM TO LOAN AGREEMENT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT DATED JUNE 25, 2008

 AND DEMAND SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE DATED JUNE 25, 2008 
 THIS AGREEMENT made this twenty-fifth day of June, 2008 by and between Action Products International, Inc., a Florida Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Borrower”), and
Presidential Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Lender”) for the purpose of Lender advancing funds based upon inventory. The terms and conditions of said advances are as follows: 
  

	 	1.	The maximum amount available for draws against inventory is as shown below and is within the limits of the Demand Secured Promissory Note executed by Borrower, dated June 25,
2008 in the amount of Two Million and no/100 Dollars ($2,000,000.00), provided however draws against inventory shall not exceed draws against Approved Receivables (as that term is defined in the Loan Agreement and Security Agreement between Borrower
and Lender dated June 25, 2008): 

  

				
	 Period Available
	  	Maximum Amount Available
	October 1 through June 30	  	$	600,000.00
	July 1 through September 30	  	$	700,000.00

 If on October 1 of any calendar year, the amount outstanding against inventory exceeds
$600,000.00, Borrower shall immediately repay the amount of the inventory loan in excess of $600,000.00. Borrower’s failure to repay the inventory loan as required herein shall constitute a default under the Loan Agreement. 
  

	 	2.	A service charge of zero point six percent (.6%) based on the average daily outstanding inventory loan balance during the month shall be earned by Lender and the undersigned hereby
agrees that the service charge will be transferred to the A/R line. An interest rate of Prime plus one percent (1%) on the principal will also be earned by Lender and transferred to the A/R line. 

  

	 	3.	Borrower agrees to provide to Lender at the end of each month a summary listing of inventory stating approximate values and location. In addition, Borrower agrees to maintain
property damage insurance coverage on all inventory with Lender named as Loss Payee and Additional Insured. 

  

	 	4.	It is agreed that inventory advances will be limited to the lesser of (a) fifty percent (50%) of the value of all eligible inventory as provided by Borrower
(“inventory availability”); (b) Six Hundred Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($600,000.00) with the exception during the period of July 1 through September 30 when the maximum amount available for draws against inventory is Seven
Hundred Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($700,000.00) or (c) the accounts receivable loan balance. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have signed and sealed on the day first above written. 
  

			
	BORROWER:
	
	Action Products International, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Robert Burrows

	Name:	 	Robert L. Burrows
	Title :	 	CFO/Secretary
	
	LENDER:
	
	Presidential Financial Corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Raymond Alberti

	Name:	 	Raymond Alberti
	Title:	 	Senior Vice President
# 43

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT &K01+000VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/200
**Part 2		Fiscal Year 2016 Reporting**

**Supplement		Section II**

**PROPOSED CHANGES TO CURRENT USSGL ACCOUNTS FOR FISCAL 2016**

**Account Title:**          Capitalized Loan Interest Receivable - Non-Credit Reform 

**Account Number:**     135100 

**Normal Balance:**      Debit 

**Definition:** The amount of accrued interest due on a non-credit reform loan that has been capitalized. Capitalized interest, like loan principal, is subject to interest charges until such time as the debt is paid or otherwise settled. Also used to record the related receivable resulting from the accretion of the original issue discount for Black Lung Disability Trust Fund Obligations.  This account does not close at yearend. 

***Justification: Update definition to clarify its use for the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund Obligations***

**Account Title:**         Capitalized Loan Interest Payable - Non-Credit Reform 

**Account Number:**    251100 

**Normal Balance:**      Credit 

**Definition:** The amount of accrued interest owed on a non-credit reform loan that has been capitalized. Capitalized interest, like loan principal, is subject to interest charges until such time as the debt is paid or otherwise settled. Also used to record the related payable resulting from the accretion of the original issue discount for Black Lung Disability Trust Fund Obligations. This account does not close at yearend. 

***Justification: Update definition to clarify its use for the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund Obligations***

**T/L S2 15-01	II-1	IRC Handout April 2, 2015**
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED  CONDENSED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS  AS OF MARCH 31,  1999
CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S  QUARTERLY  REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDING
MARCH 31, 1999,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001052262
<NAME>                        Happy Kids Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U. S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                        1
<CASH>                                 490
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          31,558
<ALLOWANCES>                           1,313
<INVENTORY>                            16,852
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       53,581
<PP&E>                                 1,801
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         56,463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  15,181
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               103
<OTHER-SE>                             35,021
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           56,463
<SALES>                                45,872
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       45,872
<CGS>                                  34,092
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          6,955
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        4,471
<INCOME-TAX>                           1,878
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    2,593
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           2,593
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          0.25 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                          0.25 <F2>
<FN>
<F1>      This amount represents Basic Earnings per Share in accordance with the
          requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting Standards No. 128 -
          "Earnings per Share".

<F2>      This amount  represents  Diluted Earnings per Share in accordance with
          the  requirements of Statement of Financial  Accounting  Standards No.
          128 - "Earnings per Share".
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Banknote Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Patrick J. Gentile, Senior Vice President Finance and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                            /s/ Patrick J. Gentile
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Patrick J. Gentile
                                            Senior Vice President Finance and
                                            Chief Financial Officer

Date: April 29, 2005