alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-46-2023]

      ( print page 81043)    
On July 19, 2023, the Metroplex International Trade Development Corporation, grantee of FTZ 168, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board on behalf of Samsung Electronics America, Inc., within Subzone 168D, in Coppell, Texas.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (88 FR 47846, July 25, 2023). On November 16, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: November 16, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-25730 Filed 11-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
No. 47335.

#### Protest 64332-K/12406 of Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills Co. (d b a Morten Milling Co.) (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

From an examination of the protest and official papers before the court nothing was found to warrant disturbance of the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 47332.

#### Protests 976462-G, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported and that no addition should have been made for planing, or tonguing and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 23.1




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                    -------------------------------
                 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
registration statements and related prospectuses filed by
Mallinckrodt Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933 of our report
dated August 12, 1998 with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of Mallinckrodt Inc. included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 1998:


                           Commission File No.
                           -------------------   
                  

                         Form S-8, No.   2-65727
                         Form S-8, No.   2-80553
                         Form S-8, No.   2-90910
                         Form S-8, No.   2-94151
                         Form S-8, No.  33-10381
                         Form S-8, No.  33-32109
                         Form S-8, No.  33-40246
                         Form S-3, No.  33-43925
                         Form S-8, No. 333-34489
                         Form S-8, No. 333-38291
                         Form S-8, No. 333-38293
                         Form S-3, No. 333-42325  
            

-------------------------
Ernst & Young LLP



St. Louis, Missouri
September 22, 1998
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 11/2/2023 1

Unsuccessful Complaint That Municipal Officers 

Were Too Incompetent to Oversee an Election 

Underwood v. Gulley 

(Madeline Hughes Haikala, N.D. Ala. 2:18-cv-1310) 

A federal judge denied plaintiffs a preliminary injunction against 

municipal officers’ overseeing an election scheduled days later. Although there was evidence of improper activity in the past, the evidence was not strong enough to show that the court’s interference 

with the upcoming election was justified. 

Subject: Voting procedures. Topics: Enjoining elections; case 

assignment. 

Six individuals filed a federal complaint in the Northern District of Alabama 

on Thursday, August 16, 2018, against officials of the City of Bessemer—

including the mayor and city-council members—who the complaint alleged 

“should be viewed as unfit to oversee another municipal election.”1 Among the 

relief sought was “a preliminary injunction to enjoin each Defendant from 

having any other role in the upcoming August 2018 elections outside of being 

allowed to cast a vote or run as a candidate.”2 On the day that the case was 

filed, the court reassigned it from Magistrate Judge John H. England III to District Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala.3

On Friday, Judge Haikala set the case for a telephone conference that afternoon,4

 and she held a hearing on Monday.5 Four days later, she denied the 

plaintiffs immediate relief.6

[T]he plaintiffs have offered evidence that suggests that there may have been 

some voter intimidation during the 2014 municipal election in Bessemer and 

that election officials may have tampered with absentee ballots and ballots 

cast on the day of the election. If ultimately proven on a full record, these 

would be serious election violations.7

But “on the record before it, the Court . . . cannot conclude that there is a 

substantial likelihood that the plaintiffs will succeed in proving a constitutional violation or a violation of the Voting Rights Act with respect to the August 28, 2018 election.”8

 Moreover: “Delaying next week’s election to accommodate new officials would impose significant logistical and financial challenges.”9

1. Complaint at 2, Underwood v. Gulley, No. 2:18-cv-1310 (N.D. Ala. Aug. 16, 2018), 

D.E. 1. 

2. Id. at 11; see Preliminary-Injunction Motion, id. (Aug. 16, 2018), D.E. 2. 

3. Reassignment Notice, id. (Aug. 16, 2018), D.E. 4. 

4. Docket Sheet, id. (Aug. 16, 2018). 

5. Id. 

6. Opinion, id. (Aug. 24, 2018), D.E. 17, 2018 WL 4052174. 

7. Id. at 3 (citation omitted). 

8. Id. at 4. 

9. Id. at 6. 
Unsuccessful Complaint That Municipal Officers 

Were Too Incompetent to Oversee an Election 

2 Federal Judicial Center 11/2/2023 

Several months after the election, Judge Haikala dismissed the case as 

moot without opposition from the plaintiffs.10

10. Order, id. (Feb. 12, 2019), D.E. 21.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
                to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed
pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.

         The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Ispat Inland Inc.


Date:      March 8, 2004                   /s/ LOUIS L. SCHORSCH
         -----------------                 -------------------------------------
                                           Louis L. Schorsch
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           Ispat Inland Inc.



<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32



      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
                to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed
pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.

         The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Ispat Inland Inc.


Date:      March 8, 2004                     /s/ MICHAEL G. RIPPEY
         -----------------                   -----------------------------------
                                             Michael G. Rippey
                                             Executive Vice President Commercial
Before the Second Division,

June 19, 1941

No. 46090.

#### Petition 6123-R of Stewart W. Percy (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence satisfied the court- of- the good faith of the petitioner. As there was no intention to defraud the revenue the petition was granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4048 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4048

      To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2024

  Mr. Heinrich (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Coons, Mr. Tillis, Ms. 
  Stabenow, Ms. Collins, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Boozman, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. 
   Crapo, Ms. Smith, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Van Hollen) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                      Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To reauthorize the North American Wetlands Conservation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North American Wetlands Conservation 
Extension Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION.

    Section 7(c) of the North American Wetlands Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 4406(c)) is amended by striking ``of this Act not to exceed 
$60,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2021 through 2025'' and inserting 
``not more than $65,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2024 through 
2028''.
                                 <all>
```
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2017 Reporting

Section VI

Bulletin No. 2017-01 DRAFT - VI RBS - 1 IRC handout 12 08 16

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/End Fed/NonFed Fund Type Reporting Type Code Recip. Cat. Addl. Info.

7.11 240000

Liability for Nonfiduciary Deposit Funds and Undeposited 

Collections E Z CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Balance Sheet
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2017 Reporting

Section VI

Bulletin No. 2017-01 DRAFT - VI RBS - 22 IRC Handout 12 08 16

Footnotes and Additional Information

1. For Reciprocal Category (RC) detail information, see TFM Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 4700, Agency Reporting 

Requirements for the Financial Report of the United States Government, Appendix 7.

2. FASAB recognizes amounts returned to Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands as non-federal custodial 

liabilities as referenced in SFFAS No. 7, paragraph 289.

3. Does not include derivative assets.

4. Related to investments in derivative assets.

5. Includes non-derivative liabilities.

6. Related to derivative liabilities.

7. Exclude General Fund (Trading Partner code 9900) activity in this account.

8. Report only General Fund (Trading Partner code 9900) activity associated with this account. With the 

implementation of GTAS there is a new Federal/Non-federal attribute domain value of G for the General Fund.
Eleventh Amendment to Employment Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 ELEVENTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This Eleventh Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into
as of March 1, 2008, by and between PriceSmart, Inc., a Delaware Corporation (“Employer”) and Edward Oats (“Executive”). 
 Recitals 
  

	A)	On January 11, 2000 an Employment Agreement was made and entered into by and between Employer and Executive. 

  

	B)	Said Employment Agreement has been amended on ten prior occasions; 

  

	C)	Employer and Executive now desire to further amend the Employment Agreement, as set forth hereinbelow: 

 Agreement 
  

	1.	Section 3.1 of the Agreement which provides: 

 3.1
Term. The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on March 31, 2000 and shall continue until March 31, 2008 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided. 
 is hereby amended, effective March 1, 2008, to provide as follows: 
 3.1 Term. The term of Executive’s employment hereunder shall commence on March 31, 2000 and shall continue until March 31, 2009 unless sooner terminated or extended as hereinafter provided.









	2.	All other terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended, shall remain unaltered and fully effective. 

 Executed in San Diego, California, as of the date first written above. 
  

							
	EXECUTIVE	 		 	EMPLOYER
			
		 		 	PRICESMART, INC.
				
	 Edward Oats
	 		 	By:	 	 /S/ JOSE LUIS LAPARTE

	 /S/ EDWARD OATS
	 		 	Name:	 	Jose Luis Laparte
		 		 	Its:	 	President
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350**

 

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alliant Energy Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

/s/ William D. Harvey

William D. Harvey

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

/s/ Eliot G. Protsch

Eliot G. Protsch

Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

March 1, 2007
**USSGL 169000 Other Investments**

**Section I & II – Chart of Accounts & Definitions**

**Account Title**:	Other Non-Federal Investments

**Account Number**:	169000

**Normal Balance**:	Debit

**Definition**:	This account is used to record the value of other non-federal investments owned by a federal entity. This account does not close at year-end.

**Section IV – Attribute Table**

**Section V – Balance Sheet & Schedule P**

**Section VII – GTAS Edits & Validations**

· Further analysis is being conducted on whether 169000 can be added to a current edit or if a new edit is necessary to facilitate proper tracking of this USSGL usage compared to balances in Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS).

**Timeline**

· Should we implement this in Fiscal Year 2024?

· Or wait and make all changes effective for period 01 of FY 2025?

Page 2 of 2                                        IRC Handout 02/15/2024

# image3.png

# image1.png

# image2.png
SUMMARY OF EXEMPTION REQUEST

Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (NGSC) seeks exemption from the requirements of 14 CFR 91.7, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.405, 91.407, 91.409, and 91.417, to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA). This exemption will permit NGSC to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) in the National Airspace System (NAS) for the purpose of demonstrating airborne inactive products in the furtherance of busine ss. BACKGROUND NGSC has been in the business of developing and producing aviation and aerospace products for over 75 years. Utilizing a DJI S900 drone as part of a product demonstration is a practical, economical, and safer method of demonstrating data
-g athering products to our customers. EQUIPMENT The DJI S900 Quadcopter has a maximum takeoff weight of 18 pounds, a maximum diagonal span of 51 inches, and a LiPo battery that provides 18 minutes of hover time. The equipment that will be operated by NGSC wi ll be registered in accordance with 49 USC 44103, Registration of Aircraft, as well as 14 CFR Part 47, aircraft Registration, and marked in accordance with 14 CFR Part 45, Identification and Registration Marking. PETITION In consideration of the size, weig ht, speed and limited operating area associated with the unmanned aircraft and its operation, NGSC’s operation of the DJI S900 Quadcopter meets the conditions of FMRA Section 333 and therefore will not require an airworthiness certificate in accordance wit h 14 CFR Part 21, Subpart H.NGSC requests relief from 14 CFR Sections 91.405 thru 91.417, as these sections set forth requirements

for maintenance that only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. NGSC will maintain the DJI S900 in accordan ce with the manufacture’s User Manual and maintenance requirements. NGSC requests relief from 14 CFR Sections 91.7, 91.119, 91.121, and 91.151, as these requirements are impractical due to the size of the equipment. NGSC will maintain at least a 20 per ce nt battery reserve at all times. CONCLUSION NGSC will operate the DJI S900 under this approval and within the parameters stated on the exemption in the associated Conditions and Limitations.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BERWICK TOWNSHIP,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT F. O'BRIEN, LINDA A. O'BRIEN, 

ROBERT F. O'BRIEN, JR., AND LYDIA A. 

O'BRIEN,

Petitioners

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 923 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of May, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
# Main

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VI

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-01	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT - VI RBS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC handout 12 08 16

# Footnotes and Additional Inform

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VI

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-01	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT - VI RBS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12 08 16
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Melinda S. Urion, the Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AmerUs Group Co. (the
Company), hereby certifies that:

      (i)   the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
            ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
            Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Commission Act of 1934; and

      (ii)  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Melinda S. Urion
-------------------------------------
Melinda S. Urion
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
AmerUs Group Co.

Dated: May 7, 2004
Part 1, Section VI: USSGL Crosswalks to Reclassified

Statements

This section includes crosswalks for use in fiscal 2017 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map USSGL

accounts to external reports in accordance with TFM Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 4700, Agency Reporting

Requirements for the Financial Report of the United States Government. Each report crosswalk lists the

proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or column on the reports. Attributes

identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This subsidiary information is

necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional information on attributes.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by

Fiscal Service:

Section VI Page Number

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Balance Sheet (RBS) VI RBS - 1

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Net Cost (RSNC) VI RSNC - 1

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Operations and Changes in Net

Position (RSOCNP)

VI RSOCNP - 1 

 

Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Gregory
J. Halpern, Chief Executive Officer of the Circle Group Holdings, Inc. certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                 (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                 (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
         of operations of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.


Dated:  August 16, 2004                    /s/ Gregory J. Halpern
                                           ----------------------
                                           Gregory J. Halpern
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 61321.

protests 306832-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### James G. Wiley *v*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 25, 2020

No. 04

- 19

- 00868

- CV

Sam YOUNGBLOOD ; Daniel P. Diepenhorst; Citrus Holdings, LLC; John William Hayes; Bob

Warshaw er; Jay McAnnelly; Ehrenberg Chesler Capital Partners, LLC; Ernest T. Wakabayashi,

Individually and as Trustee of The Wakabayashi Trust; Gil Hodge; Patricia Hodge; Carter Speer;

and Kai Wakabayashi (Cross

- Appellee)

,

Appellants

v.

Phil ZACCARIA and Pionee r C

- Stores Management, Inc. (Cross

- Appellant),

Appellees

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CI19312

Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Unopposed Joint Motion for Substitution of Counsel for Appellees, Phi Zaccaria and

Pioneer C

- Stones Management, Inc. is hereby GR ANTED.

It is so ORDERED on February 25, 2020

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________

MIC HAEL A. CRUZ

CLERK OF COURT