UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

-----------------------------------------------------X 

 : 

IN RE WORLD TRADE CENTER : 

DISASTER SITE LITIGATION : 

 : 

-----------------------------------------------------X 

 

CORRECTIVE ORDER 

21 MC 100 (AKH) 

ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: 

I issue this Order to rescind and correct my Order of February 27, 2004. 

In my Order of February 27, 2004, I ordered that actions consolidated in 21 MC 

100 and heretofore suspended for purposes of filing claims with the Victim Compensation Fund 

(VCF) be further extended to April 16, 2004. 

That Order is hereby modified. Appendix A, attached to this Order, identifies the 

cases consolidated in 21 MC 100 and their active or suspense status. Plaintiffs with cases on the 

suspense docket shall appear before this court on March 17, 2004, at 4:00 p.m., at the same 

hearing scheduled for the cases consolidated in 21 MC 97, and show cause why such cases 

should be suspended beyond that date; otherwise, such cases will be dismissed. 

I also ordered that cases that were consolidated in 21 MC 100 can remain on the 

suspense calendar until the earlier of (a) notice of eligibility for an award by the Victim 

Compensation Fund, or (b) notice by a plaintiff, served and filed as late as April 16, 2004, stating 

a wish to proceed with litigation in preference to making claim to the VCF. According to the list 

provided by the VCF pursuant to my Order of February 25, 2004, no plaintiffs in these 

consolidated actions have claims pending before the VCF. Therefore, this Order of February 27, 

2004 is rescinded. And, generally, except possibly in narrow circumstances, there is no more 

need for a suspense calendar for the cases consolidated in 21 MC 100 than there is for the cases 

consolidated in 21 MC 97. 
Finally, in my Opinion and Order of June 20, 2003, I ordered that actions 

consolidated in 21 MC 100 “shall remain suspended until the determination by the Court of 

Appeals on the issue of jurisdiction.” That suspension shall relate only to the proceedings 

relating to jurisdiction that I assigned to the Honorable Theodore H. Katz, U.S.M.J. These 

actions shall not be suspended for any other purpose. 

SO ORDERED. 

Dated: New York, New York 

 March 2, 2004 

_________________//S//__________________

 ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN 

 United States District Judge 

2
APPENDIX A 

21 MC 100 

02 Civ. 05288 Taha v. City of New York Active 

02 Civ. 08092 Bel, et al. v. Port Authority of New York and New Active 

Jersey, et al. 

02 Civ. 08100 Bel, et al. v. Port Authority of New York and New Active 

Jersey, et al. 

02 Civ. 08434 Hickey v. City of New York and Port Authority of Active 

New York and New Jersey 

02 Civ. 08938 Beyer, et al. v. Port Authority of New York and Active 

New Jersey 

02 Civ. 09126 McNally, et al. v. Port Authority of New York and Active 

New Jersey 

02 Civ. 09127 Ariola, et al. v. Port Authority of New York and Active 

New Jersey 

02 Civ. 09128 Blake, et al. v. Port Authority of New York and Active 

New Jersey 

02 Civ. 10270 Adams, et al. v. City of New York Suspended 

02 Civ. 10272 Greenwood, et al. v. City of New York Suspended 

02 Civ. 10273 Miller v. City of New York, et al. Active 

02 Civ. 10274 Rowe v. City of New York Active 

02 Civ. 10275 Rementeria, et al. v. City of New York Active 

02 Civ. 10304 Davi v. City of New York Suspended 

03 Civ. 00006 Dalton v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 00007 Johnson, et al. v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 00008 Flechaus v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 00033 Annerino, et al. v. City of New York Suspended 

03 Civ. 00034 Albrecht, et al. v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 00035 Arocho, et al. v. City of New York Suspended 

03 Civ. 00036 Agugliaro, et al. v. City of New York Suspended 

03 Civ. 00037 Stephenson, et al. v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 00038 Accardo, et al. v. City of New York, et al. Active 

03 Civ. 00193 Baiano, et al. v. City of New York, et al. Active 

03 Civ. 00912 Hendrickson, et al. v. City of New York Active 

1 
03 Civ. 02067 Maskimowich v. New York City Active 

03 Civ. 02104 D’Elia v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 02447 Samaroo v. Port Authority of New York and New Active 

 Jersey, et al. 

03 Civ. 02621 Fucella, et al. v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 02622 McGrory v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 02623 Berardi v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 03040 Hartey, et al. v. City of New York, et al. Active 

03 Civ. 04064 Lazaar v. City of New York, et al. Active 

03 Civ. 05052 Romano v. New York City Active 

03 Civ. 08448 City of New York v. Liberty Mutual Fire Active 

03 Civ. 08577 Nolan, et al. v. City of New York Active 

03 Civ. 08812 Anastassatos v. Tully Construction, et al. Active 

04 Civ. 00491 Nolan, et al. v. Silverstein Properties, Inc., et al. Active 

04 Civ. 01123 Wolf v. the City of New York Active 

2