alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0

                        EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Three Months ended                       Nine Months ended
                                                             September 30                           September 30
                                                       2000               1999               2000                 1999
                                                  ---------------     --------------     --------------      ----------------
<S>                                               <C>                 <C>                <C>                 <C>
Net Earnings                                           $ (14,184)          $ (1,606)         $ (32,589)             $(10,655)
Weighted Average Number of
      Common Shares Outstanding                              947                947                947                   947
                                                  ---------------     --------------     --------------      ----------------

Net earnings per Common Share                              $ (15)              $ (1)             $ (34)                $ (11)
                                                  ===============     ==============     ==============      ================
</TABLE>

The Company does not have a complex capital structure and therefore, only has
basic earnings per share.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LINDA HUDSON AND STEPHANIE

HUDSON

V.

WILBERTO GONZALEZ & DOLLAR RENT

A CAR SYSTEMS, INC., & RENTAL CAR

FINANCE CORP. 

: CIVIL ACTION

:

:

:

:

: NO. 02-4365

DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S 

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES

Defendants, Wilberto Gonzalez & Dollar Rent A Car Systems, Inc., & Rental Car

Finance Corp., through their attorneys, MARGOLIS EDELSTEIN, hereby move this

Honorable Court to deny Plaintiff’s Order to compel discovery responses pursuant to the

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3).

1. Admitted.

2. Admitted.

3. Denied.

4. Denied.

5. Admitted. 

6. Admitted.

7. Denied as to use of phrase “written response.”

8. Admitted.

9. Admitted.

10. Admitted.

Case 2:02-cv-04365-MAM Document 18 Filed 01/21/2003 Page 1 of 4
11. Admitted.

12. Admitted in part and denied in part. Defendant’s counsel correctly stated that the 

Defendant’s statement was not discoverable pursuant to the Federal Rules.

13. Denied.

14. Denied as to the argument that a document response has not been produced.

15. Denied. Defendants contend that pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(b)(3), Plaintiffs are not

entitled to the statement made by Defendant Gonzalez because the Plaintiffs must

demonstrate a substantial need of the materials in preparation of the Plaintiffs’ case and

that the Plaintiffs are unable to do so with substantial hardship to obtain the substantial

equivalent of the materials by any means. Plaintiffs must first meet this burden in order

to obtain this sta tement.

16. Denied as moot because Defendants has served a document response and

Defendant, Gonzalez has given sworn deposition testimony concerning the Plaintiff’s

interrogatories and his answers.

17. Admitted.

18. Denied in part, as a document response has been served.

19. Admitted.

20. Admitted. 

21. Admitted.

22. Denied in part as Defendants have served document responses. 

23. Admitted.

Case 2:02-cv-04365-MAM Document 18 Filed 01/21/2003 Page 2 of 4
WHEREFORE, Defendants, Wilberto Gonzalez & Dollar Rent A Car Systems,

Inc., & Rental Car Finance Corp., respectfully request from this Court an Order in its

favor to deny the Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the Production of a Statement of

Defendant, Wilberto Gonalez. 

MARGOLIS EDELSTEIN

BY: 

JOSEPH GOLDBERG, ESQUIRE

I.D. No. 21376

ROBERT D. MACMAHON, ESQUIRE

I.D. No. 54367 

Attorneys for Defendants Dollar Rent A Car

Systems, Inc. and Rental Car Finance Corp. and

Wilberto Gonzalez

The Curtis Center - Fourth Floor

Independence Square West

Philadelphia, PA 19106-3304

(215) 931-5892

Case 2:02-cv-04365-MAM Document 18 Filed 01/21/2003 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04365-MAM Document 18 Filed 01/21/2003 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.1
TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
CERTIFICATION
In connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Jerry D. Chase, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of thedate hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge:
 (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.     Date: May 9, 2005   By /s/ Jerry D. Chase       Jerry D. Chase   Chief Executive Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL

ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION,

HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL

FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS

ANNUITY AND 401(K) RETIREMENT

PLAN,

Plaintiffs,

5.

HUGHES ELEVATOR CAB CO., INC.,

Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION 

No. 05-3704

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of August , 2009, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’

Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs

(Docket No. 29, filed Feb. 4, 2009), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying

Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs is GRANTED in the

amount of $13,319.50; 

2. Final Judgment is GRANTED for Plaintiffs in the amount of $43,783.56,

and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Louis H. Pollak

Pollak, J.

Case 2:05-cv-03704-LP Document 34 Filed 08/13/09 Page 1 of 1
No. 60815.

Suit 4891.

#### United States (Bellhouse Louver Windows, Party in Interest) *v.*Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.

C. D. 1782 affirmed March 29, 1957. C. A. D. 646.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of**

**Title 18 Of The United States Code**

 

I, J. Patrick Spainhour, the Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ J. Patrick  Spainhour |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | J. Patrick Spainhour      |
|   | November 16, 2009    |

 

1

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUSANNE H. LINN and MELISSA KNESZ,

Plaintiff,

v.

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 02 CV 4417

 

Judge Anita Brody

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK:

Kindly enter the appearance of John R. Bielski, Esquire, of Willig, Williams

& Davidson, as additional counsel for Defendant AFSCME Local 2549.

_______________________________

John R. Bielski

Attorney I.D. No. 86790

WILLIG, WILLIAMS & DAVIDSON

1845 Walnut Street, 24th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19109-1030

(215) 772-1500

Attorneys for Defendant,

AFSCME Local 2549

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 17 Filed 04/25/2003 Page 1 of 2
I, JOHN R. BIELSKI, ESQUIRE, hereby certify that I have this day caused

a true and correct copy of the foregoing Entry of Appearance to be served by first class

mail, postage prepaid, upon the following:

Anne P. Felker, Esquire

539 Center Street

P.O. Box 190

Bethlehem, PA 18016-0190

(610) 861-7737

Jordan Yeager, Esquire

Boockvar & Yeager

714 Main Street

Bethlehem, PA 18018

(610) 861-4662

Counsel for Plaintiffs

David J. MacMain, Esquire

L. Kristen Blanchard, Esquire

Montgomery, McCracken, Walker

 & Rhoads, LLP

123 South Broad Street

Philadelphia, PA 19109

Counsel for Defendants Northampton County

 and Todd Buskirk

_____________________________

JOHN R. BIELSKI, ESQUIRE

Dated: April 25, 2003

Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 17 Filed 04/25/2003 Page 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of
American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of
the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report and the results of
operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.

| |  |                                                       
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By: /s/ Kenneth H. Traub                              
| |  |                                                       
| |  | Kenneth H. Traub
President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: May 14, 2003

15
No. 53504.

protest 114382-K (Galveston).

#### W. R. Zanes & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
# sec5_balsh_2023

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10V BS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10June 2023
#### UNITED STATES, Appellee v DAVID A. BARKAI, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant UNITED STATES, Appellee v EDWARD R. KACHMARIK, Specialist Four, U. S. Army, Appellant UNITED STATES, Appellee v DANIEL H. PICARD, Private, U. S. Army, Appellant

No. 27,089

SPCM 8479

No. 27,279

CM 429039

No. 27,407

CM 429879

March 29, 1974

*Colonel Arnold I. Melnick*(No. 27,089; No. 27,279; No. 27,407), *Captain J. Houston Gordon*(No. 27,279; No. 27,407), *Captain Denis E. Hynes*(No. 27,279; No. 27,407), *Captain Leland M. Stenehjem, Jr.*(No. 27,089), and *Captain Gilbert J. Weller*(No. 27,089) were on the pleadings for Appellants, Accused.

*Lieutenant Colonel Ronald M. Holdaway*(No. 27,089; No. 27,279; No. 27,407), *Lieutenant Colonel Donald W. Hansen*(No. 27,407), *Major Thomas P. Burns, III*(No. 27,089; No. 27,279), *Captain M Douglas Deitchler*(No. 27,089; No. 27,279; No. 27,407), *Captain William A. Kolibash*(No. 27,089), *Captain Lawrence D. Martin*(No. 27,279), and *Captain Thomas P. McCullough, Jr.*(No. 27,407) were on the pleadings for Appellee, United States.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam:

For the reasons set out in United States v Sloan, 22 USCMA 587, 48 CMR 211 (1974), we affirm the decision of the Court of Military Review.
Exhibit 23






                          Independent Auditors' Consent



The Board of Directors
Furniture Brands International, Inc.:

We  consent  to  incorporation  by  reference  in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
33-65714,   333-6990,   333-39355,   333-80189,   333-100133  on  Form  S-8  and
Registration   Statement  No.   333-84992  on  Form  S-3  of  Furniture   Brands
International,  Inc.  of our report  dated  January  22,  2003,  relating to the
consolidated  balance  sheets  of  Furniture  Brands  International,   Inc.  and
subsidiaries  as of  December  31, 2002 and 2001,  and the related  consolidated
statements of operations,  shareholders'  equity, and cash flows and the related
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002,
which  report  appears in the  December  31, 2002 annual  report on Form 10-K of
Furniture Brands International, Inc.

Our report  refers to a change in accounting  for goodwill and other  intangible
assets.




KPMG LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
March 25, 2003
# Data

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/1/21
* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

Summary Calendar

No. 95-50884

_______________________

AUGUST BUTLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS LOCAL #81; NATIONAL

ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM; NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY,

INC.; INTERNATIONAL UNION OF ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS; MONTGOMERY

ELEVATOR COMPANY; OMNI ELEVATOR SERVICE CO.; DOVER ELEVATOR COL; A1 ELEVATOR SERVICE; OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY; SCHLINDER ELEVATOR

CORP.; ESCO ELEVATOR, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(SA-93-CV-305)

_________________________________________________________________

July 11, 1997

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

August Butler filed suit alleging that eleven defendants

had discriminated against him in violation of Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1964. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et. seq. As to all
2

the defendants except the International Union of Elevator

Constructors Local Union #81, the district court adopted the

magistrate judge’s recommendation that Butler’s claims be dismissed

without prejudice. Butler’s EEOC complaint named Local Union #81

as the only respondent, thus the district court concluded that

Butler had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies as to the

other eleven defendants. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1). The

district court also granted summary judgment for Local Union #81 on

the grounds that Butler had not produced any evidence that its

actions were racially motivated.

Pursuing his appeal pro se and in forma pauperis, Butler

alleges numerous points of error, arguing that the district court

erred by dismissing his claims on exhaustion grounds, denying

motions to compel discovery, and denying relief from the judgment

“when fraud and perjury had been perpetrated upon the district

court.” 

Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we find no

error in the resolution of this case by the magistrate judge and

the district court. For essentially the reasons articulated in its

orders, the decisions of the district court are

AFFIRMED.
TRUSTED WORLDWIDE SINCE 1908

SPECIFICATIONS

INSTANTEYE 

u Aircraft Weight: ~1 lb.

u Dimensions: 9"x9"

u Plug-n-Play Payloads: Real-time video, thermal, IR flood

u Propulsion: 4 brushless electric motors

u Video Range: LOS 650 – 1200 m

u Control Interface: Handheld GCS, digital encrypted

u Stowage: Waterproof custom fit case, 2 Instant Eye aircrafts, 1 GCS, 

batteries, charger, spare motors and propellers

u GCS: Trans-reflective daylight readable screen

u Service Ceiling: 12,000+ ft. MSL

u Wind Station Holding: 30+ mph

u Endurance: 20-35 minutes (Payload dependent)

CONTACT DARLEY FOR A DEMO

LOW COST, LIGHTWEIGHT ELECTRIC SUAS

Included Components

Custom Fit 

Padded Case

Designed to be rapidly deployed to gather local (<1200 m) short term 

(<35 min.) situational awareness. The InstantEye is capable of flying in 

inclement weather including winds exceeding 30 mph, heavy rain/snow, 

altitudes up to 12,000 ft. MSL, and temperatures between -10 to 115o F. 

The standard payload consists of three fixed EO cameras with IR illumination 

for night capability. Other plug and play payloads include a gimbaled, 

zoomable, LWIR thermal imager, drop mechanism, and high resolution 

camera. Kit includes two InstantEye aircrafts, compact ground station 

controller, batteries, charging system, and spare components.

KEY FEATURES

u Deploys in seconds

u Military utility demonstrated

u Covert day/night (thermal) real time aerial ISR

u All weather, winds 30+ mph

u Compact size

u Operated by individual Responder

u Data products on GCS (networked through relay) or recorded by GCS DVR

MIKE MOCERINO

ROBOTICS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT

630.363.7288 • MIKEMOCERINO@DARLEY.COM

WWW.DARLEYDEFENSE.COM •   
Exhibit 31.2

        Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer

I, Robert E. Dolan, certify that:

     1. I have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of  Sunshine  PCS
Corporation;

     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a  material  fact or omit to  state a  material  fact  necessary  to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances  under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

     3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

     4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer and I are  responsible for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal  control over financial
reporting  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(f) and  15d-15(f))  for the
registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  April 20, 2004


/s/ Robert E. Dolan
-------------------
Robert E. Dolan
Principal Accounting Officer
No. 67833.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/12290 (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of boiled wool fiber similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 107, C.D. 2320), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2****Certification of Chief Financial Officer**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:     (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and     (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.          Dated:January 10, 2007 /s/ Mark A. Richman          Mark A. Richman    Chief Financial Officer and
No. 65472.

#### Ritcher Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/487, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
1 Case No. S-04-0005-LKK-CMK 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Marc J. Feldman, State Bar No. 144830 

Seth M. Friedman, State Bar No. 186239 

LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP

600 West Broadway, Suite 2600 

San Diego, California 92101-3372 

Telephone No.: 619.236.1414 

Fax No.: 619.232.8311 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Allstate Insurance Company 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

DAVID BACK, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, 

INC., DOES ONE through 100, Inclusive, 

Defendants. 

Case No. CIV.S-04-0005LKK CMK 

The Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton 

Dept. 4 

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR 

DISMISSAL 

Complaint Filed: January 5, 2004 

WHEREAS, the parties have reached a settlement of this action, 

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their attorneys 

of record, that this action be dismissed with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs. 

DATED: _____________, 2005 /signature on original

 Larry L. Baumbach 

 Attorney for Plaintiff David Back 

Case 2:04-cv-00005-LKK -CMK Document 97 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 2
2 Case No. S-04-0005-LKK-CMK 

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

DATED: ___________, 2005 LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP

By: /signature on original

Marc J. Feldman 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Allstate Insurance Company 

 

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation set forth above, and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice, with each 

party to bear its own costs. 

Dated: November 14, 2005 

 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton

 Lawrence K. Karlton 

 Senior Judge 

 United States District Court 

Case 2:04-cv-00005-LKK -CMK Document 97 Filed 11/14/05 Page 2 of 2
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS3766 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.