alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# **Exhibit32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

## **OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Click2learn, Inc., on Form 10-Q for the period endedSeptember 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Form 10-Q”), I, Kevin M. Oakes, Chief Executive Officer andI, John D. Atherly, Chief Financial Officer, of Click2learn, Inc., certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Form 10-Q fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Click2learn, Inc.

 

Dated: November 12, 2003

 

 
| /s/ Kevin M. Oakes      |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| Kevin M. Oakes          |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| /s/ John D. Atherly     |   |
| John D. Atherly         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided toClick2learn, Inc. and will be retained by Click2learn, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection VII  &"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"December 2018
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: August 9, 2006
_____________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ALAN B. CURTIS,

Appellant,

v.

JEANINE R. SAXTON and SHILEEN D. PENDLETON,

Appellees.

No. 4D19-3402

[May 14, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Indian River County; Janet Carney Croom, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

312018CA000513.

Alan B. Curtis, Graceville, pro se.

Jeanine R. Saxton and Shileen D. Pendleton, Vine Grove, Kentucky, pro 

se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
----

Action brought on 21 July 2006 — Rathscheck Schiefer und Dach-Systeme and Others v Commission

(Case T-198/06)

(2006/C 237/16)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Rathscheck Schiefer und Dach-Systeme KG (Mayen, Germany), Nikolaus Theis Nachf. Böger GmbH (Bundenbach, Germany) and I.B. Rathscheck Söhne KG Moselschiefer-Bergwerke (Mayen, Germany) (represented by: T. Risse, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Declare invalid Article 1 of the Commission Decision of 8 March 2006 on Germany's State aid No C 31/2004 (ex NN 53/2004) to Magog Schiefergruben GmbH & Co. KG.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants contest Article 1 of Commission Decision C (2006) 641 final of 8 March 2006, by which the Commission decided that the State aid awarded by Germany to Schiefergruben Magog GmbH & Co. KG, a competitor of the applicants, is compatible in part with the common market in accordance with Article 87(3)(c) EC.

The applicants took part in the Commission's formal verification procedure.

In support of their claim, the applicants allege infringement of Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises (OJ 2001 L 10, p. 33) in the version amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 364/2004 of 25 February 2004 (OJ 2004 L 63, p. 22).

In the applicants' view, there is eligibility for aid under Articles 5a and 5b of Regulation No 70/2001 only if the new production process, the implementation of which was assisted by the aid, is a precompetitive development. They submit that that is not the case in the present situation, since the prototype for which aid was granted is not innovative.

Furthermore, the applicants submit in support of their claim that there is here no eligibility for aid under Article 4 of Regulation No 70/2001. There is eligibility only where the production process receiving aid is significantly changed from the previous production process. That precondition is not met in this case since the working procedure in the production process has remained the same.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                    

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted
from the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements
of operations of the Company's Form 10-K/A No. 1, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                              55
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      503
<ALLOWANCES>                                        17
<INVENTORY>                                        470
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1173
<PP&E>                                            1412
<DEPRECIATION>                                     517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1182
<BONDS>                                            945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         11
<COMMON>                                            87
<OTHER-SE>                                         908
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3873    
<SALES>                                           2367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2367
<CGS>                                             1369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (250)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        18
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (268)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      72 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           (8)
<NET-INCOME>                                      (204)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.81)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.81)
        

</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

Bulletin No. 2022-16

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to Bulletin No. 2022-12, U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury 

Financial Manual (TFM) Supplement

1. Purpose: This bulletin notifies agencies that Part 1 and Part 2 of the USSGL Supplement have been 

revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 and FY 2023. 

2. Summary of Changes: The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. 

3. Changes by Part/Section/File: 

Part 1 - FY 2022 Reporting changes to files in Sections I, II, III, IV, V, and VII:

Section I: Chart of Accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting 

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2022 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule
Page 2 of 3

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2022 Reporting 

 Validations Detail

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

 Edits Closing

Part 2 - FY 2023 Reporting changes to files in Sections I, II, III, IV, V, and VII:

Section I: Chart of Accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting 

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2023 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2023 Reporting 

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

 Edits Closing

4. Effective Date: 

Part 1 requirements for FY 2022 are effective immediately. 

Part 2 requirements for FY 2023 are effective immediately. 
Page 3 of 3

5. Inquiries: 

Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Chris Beck

Director, General Ledger and Intragovernmental Transaction Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Email: USSGLTeam@fiscal.treasury.gov

Date: September 12, 2022
FM QSMO MARKETPLACE

Providing access to innovative and standardsbased financial management solutions

BROKERING 

RELATIONSHIPS

WITH AGENCIES 

AND PROVIDERS 

FEDERAL AGENCIES 

Agencies are encouraged to consult 

with the FM QSMO early and often 

throughout their financial management 

modernization journey. 

We have created tools and resources 

that include a readiness assessment, 

an FM QSMO customer journey map, 

and Marketplace acquisition guidance.

We can also provide access to lessons 

learned and leading practices to help 

agencies prepare for modernization. 

VENDORS 

Vendors are invited to bring modern, 

configurable, and service-oriented 

solutions to the Marketplace. 

Vendors should apply to the FM QSMO 

Information Technology Special Item 

Number (SIN) 518210FM under the 

existing GSA Multiple Award Schedule 

(MAS) contract vehicle.

Email us at 

FMQSMO@fiscal.treasury.gov 

with questions or feedback 

about the FM QSMO, our 

Marketplace Catalog, or to sign 

up for our mailing lists. 

CURRENT NEEDS

Federal agencies continue to face 

challenges with financial management 

systems. The environment is complex,

systems are aging, costs to operate 

and maintain systems are increasing, 

and federal agencies work separately 

with vendors to implement changes or 

new requirements. Opportunities exist 

to improve modernization planning, 

streamline the acquisition process, and 

ensure systems comply with standards 

and meet new reporting requirements. 

There are also opportunities to 

increase and broaden the use of 

shared federal financial management 

services. 

FM QSMO MARKETPLACE 

The FM QSMO Marketplace, launched 

in December 2022, offers a mix of 

technology, advisory, and operational 

solutions and services to help agencies 

meet their financial management 

needs and shared government-wide 

goals. There is choice and flexibility 

through a network of commercial 

vendors and federal shared service 

providers, as well as a suite of valueadded services from Treasury’s 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service. The FM 

QSMO serves as a broker between 

agencies and providers to support

modernization planning and assist with 

using the Marketplace. 

The U.S. Department of the Treasury was designated by OMB as the Financial 

Management Quality Service Management Office (FM QSMO) in June 2020. The 

FM QSMO offers a new approach to shared services and federal financial 

management by managing a marketplace of solutions and services that drive 

innovation, compliance with federal policies, standardization, and automation.

ENGAGE

We welcome engagement from federal agencies and vendors and encourage our 

stakeholders to continue partnering with us as the Marketplace grows to meet 

agency needs. 

Visit the FM QSMO website for 

information on the Marketplace and to 

access helpful resources for both federal 

agencies and commercial vendors. 

April 2023

Visit the FM QSMO Marketplace 

Catalog for information on available 

services and solutions.
04.05
### BankofAmerica ,...

**~**

07/3112014 Ms. Cristina Fernandez Associate Director Office ofAir Program Planning US EPA Region III Air Protection Division 1650 Arch Street (3APOO) Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029

Re: Relieffrom Tier 4i Engine "Inducement" in Emergency Situations
Dear Ms. Fernandez, Bank ofAmerica is writing this letter in support ofCaterpillar and EMA's (Engine Manufacturers Association) position to obtain short term relieffrom the inducements (automatic engine shutdown due to emission control system malfunction) associated with Tier 4i certified _Aiesel

**engin~s** while operating in emergency situations.

Bank ofAmerica has recently installed five (5) Tier 4i certified 2,250 kW diesel generators at its Pennsylvania Data Center. These five generators are in addition to six generators installed prior to 2008. The purpose ofall generators at this site is to provide emergency backup in the event of a power outage or fluctuation. The Data Center is a critical facility and any loss ofpower while either onutility orbackup generatorpower would result in potentiallymillions ofdollars worth ofequipment losses/damages, as well as the loss and shutdown ofbanking services to our global customerbase. It is absolutely crucial that powerbe maintained even when utility service is interrupted. Thus, any possibility ofa generator shutdown while operating in emergency situations must be avoided. As a result ofextensive discussions with the EPA, EMA provided a letter on July 9, 2014 that proposed a potential solution to engine inducement when operating in emergency situations. Bank ofAmerica is also urging the EPA to change the current required manufacturer inducement protocols that are a part ofthe Tier 4i regulation. While Bank ofAmerica fully intends to properly maintain their generator emission control systems, the inability to prevent any ofthe Tier 4i engines from derating and shutdown creates an unacceptable risk no matter how remote the possibility. We also want to convey the urgency ofaddressing this situation because ofthe potential consequences ofengine inducement. Bank ofAmerica is also confronted with this situation at some ofits other facilities including locations inVirginia and Texas, where wehave installed Tier 4i engines that function as emergency generators. Although we could have installed Tier 2 engines, we opted to install the lower emission Tier 4i engines and now are at risk during a power outage because ofthe inducement requirement.

### BankofAmerica ,..

**~** Thank you for your consideration ofboth Bank ofAmerica's and EMA's request withrespect to this matter.

GalinaB. Chadwick, P.E. SVP, Environmental Manager Corporate Workplace galina.chadwick@bankofamerica.com

cc: Ms. Melanie King Energy Strategies Group, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Office ofAir Quality Planning and Standards, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Mr. BrianJabeck Market Development & Design Engineer Consultant, Cat Electric Power
EXHIBIT 32(ii)

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Local Telecom Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Arthur R. Berger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Okley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ Richard M. Hewitt
--------------------------
Richard M. Hewitt
Chief Financial Officer

Date:  February 16, 2005
       -----------------
Before the Third Division,

February 7, 1945

No. 50002.

#### Protest 111465-K of Wm. P. Teuscher, M. D. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial there was no appearance on the part of the plaintiff. An examination of the record failed to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s decision. The protest was therefore overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4090 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4090

To withhold Federal funding from any college or university that employs 
                       illegal aliens on campus.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 9, 2024

  Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Braun, Mr. Hawley, and Mr. Cotton) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To withhold Federal funding from any college or university that employs 
                       illegal aliens on campus.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enforcing the Rule of Law on Campus 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INELIGIBILITY OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES THAT EMPLOY ILLEGAL 
              ALIENS TO RECEIVE FEDERAL FUNDING.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any institution of 
higher education (as defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act 
of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1002)) with a policy or practice of employing aliens 
who are unlawfully present in the United States at any campus of such 
institution in violation of section 274A of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1324a) shall be ineligible to receive any 
Federal funding.
                                 <all>
```
# sec6_rsonp_2023

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSOCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2022
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONEL CANTU LOPEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-822 LKK KJM P

vs.

D. BUTLER, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. On April 8,

2005, the court issued findings and recommendations recommending that the action be dismissed

for plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint.

On April 18 and 21, 2005, plaintiff filed objections, noting that he had not

received the court’s order of January 3, 2005, dismissing his complaint with leave to file an

amended complaint.

/////

/////

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00822-LKK -KJM Document 13 Filed 04/25/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The findings and recommendations of April 8, 2005 are hereby vacated; 

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file an

amended complaint; and

3. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve the order of January 3, 2005 (docket

number 8) on plaintiff, along with a copy of this order.

DATED: April 25, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

lope0822.vacf&r

Case 2:04-cv-00822-LKK -KJM Document 13 Filed 04/25/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

|

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT | CIVIL ACTION

|

Plaintiff, |

|

v. | NO. 02-4421

|

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER |

OF COMMERCE, INC., et al., |

|

Defendants. |

O R D E R

AND NOW, this ______ day of July, 2004, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion for

Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Discovery Order (Doc. 17) and Defendants’ Response (Doc.

18), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT:

_____________________________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 20 Filed 07/12/2004 Page 1 of 1
No. 51667.

#### Protest 916411-G of Halle Brothers Co. (Cleveland).

*185Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of knit fabric the same in all material respects as the fabric of which the gloves the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333) were made. In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.