alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-30-1995
<CASH>                                         116,277
<SECURITIES>                                    63,851
<RECEIVABLES>                                  539,290
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,494
<INVENTORY>                                    303,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,068,890
<PP&E>                                       1,359,525
<DEPRECIATION>                                 632,666
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,027,601
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          641,649
<BONDS>                                        260,752
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,750
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,018,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,027,601
<SALES>                                     12,667,562
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,667,562
<CGS>                                       12,063,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,063,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               123,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,784
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                459,312
<INCOME-TAX>                                   179,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            280,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (22,189)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   257,923
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.69
        

</TABLE>
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-10	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 3/10/22
(Reap. Dec. 8148)

#### D. F. De Bernardi & Co. et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 10775, etc.

(Decided July 25, 1952)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George B. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Richard R. FitzGibbon,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

> 1) That the merchandise marked “A” on the invoices and initialed TLW by Customs Examiner T. L. Walton, involved in the appeals listed in the attached schedule, consists of merchandise exported from France, and appraised at values which included the so-called production or unique tax (also known as the French Fiscal Reform Law tax) in the amounts as shown by the invoices and accompanying certificates of pending reappraisement.

> *4552) That merchandise such or similar to the imported merchandise, marked “A” in paragraph I, when sold or offered for sale at the time of exportation, in France for home consumption, or for exportation to countries other than the United States, in the ordinary course of trade to all purchasers, and in the usual wholesale quantities, was sold or offered for sale at the appraised values herein, less the French Fiscal Reform Tax (Production or Unique tax) as referred to above in paragraph 1 and as added by the importer on entry, plus 1.01 percent Armament tax when not included in the appraised value, packed, and that the export value was no higher.

> 3) That all other claims of the plaintiffs, as raised by these appeals, are hereby abandoned, and that upon this stipulation these cases are submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoices by the items marked "A” and initialed TLW by Customs Examiner T. L. Walton, and that such values were the appraised values, less the French fiscal reform tax (production or unique tax) as added by the importers on entry, plus 1.01 per centum armament tax when not included in the appraised value, packed.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals were hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 67838.

#### Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/15067-16652 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
June 10, 2015 

Mr. Charlie Dinges 

Icon Dips, LLC 

302 Brookstone Dr SE 

Rochester, MN 55904 

Dear Mr. Dinges: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 11, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1307), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
UAS Information

Make Model Type Description Christopher Todd Hill X8L Rotorcraft Max Wt: 54lbs Power Source:Electric/ Battery Yuneec Q500 Rotorcraft Max Wt: 12lbs Power Source:Electric/ Battery DJI Inspire 1 Rotorcraft Max Wt: 17lbs Power Source:Electric/ Battery DJI PhantomRotorcraft Max Wt: 8 lbs Power Source:Electric/ Battery Infotron IT80 Rotorcraft Max Wt: 54lbs Power Source:Electric/ Battery
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0351

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ISAAC WILLIAM MACY,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 6, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 28 2022

11/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0351
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michelle LINDBERG, aka Gina Lindberg, aka Pho Duoc Lindberg, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-10322.

D.C. No. CR-95-00312-ADE.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 23, 2001 *.

Decided May 3, 2001.

*496Before CHOY, SKOPIL, and FARRIS, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant's request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Michelle Lindberg appeals her sentence, arguing that *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), prohibits the district court from making upward adjustments to her base offense level without first submitting the underlying facts to a jury for proof beyond a reasonable doubt. We have previously considered and rejected this argument. *See United States v. Ellis,*241 F.3d 1096, 1104 (9th Cir.2001); *United States v. Panaro,*241 F.3d 1104, 1114 (9th Cir.2001); *United States v. Hernandez-Guardado,*228 F.3d 1017, 1024-27 (9th Cir.2000). These cases make clear that *Apprendi*does not apply to sentencing guideline adjustments and enhancements that do not increase a defendant’s sentence beyond the statutory maximum for the crime committed. Because Lindberg’s sentence does not exceed the statutory máximums for the crimes she committed, her sentence does not violate *Apprendi.*

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the cpurts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Before the Third Division,

August 15, 1949

No. 53492.

protests 143983-K, etc. (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4179 

To extend and modify the lend-lease authority to Ukraine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2024 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. COONS, and Mr. SCOTT of 

South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To extend and modify the lend-lease authority to Ukraine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ukraine Democracy 

5 Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF LEND-LEASE 

7 AUTHORITY TO UKRAINE. 

8 Section 2 of the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend9 Lease Act of 2022 (Public Law 117–118; 136 Stat. 1184) 

10 is amended— 


rfrederick on LAP8M3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4179 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ‘‘fiscal 

2 years 2022 and 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘fiscal years 

3 2022 through 2026’’; 

4 (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as sub5 section (d); and 

6 (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(c) REPORT.—Not later than 90 days after the use 

9 of the authority under subsection (a), the Secretary of De10 fense, in coordination with the Secretary of State, shall 

11 submit to Congress a report that includes— 

12 ‘‘(1) a description of the defense articles loaned 

13 or leased to the Government of Ukraine, or to the 

14 government of an Eastern European country im15 pacted by the Russian Federation’s invasion of 

16 Ukraine, under such authority; and 

17 ‘‘(2) a strategy and timeline for recovery and 

18 return of such defense articles.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on LAP8M3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 3

Bulletin No. 2023-04

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury Financial Manual (TFM) 

Supplement

1. Purpose: This bulletin notifies agencies that Part 1 and 2 of the USSGL Supplement have been revised 

for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 and 2024. 

2. Summary of Changes: The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. 

3. Changes by Part/Section/File: 

Part 1 - FY 2023 Reporting changes to files in Sections III, IV, V, and VII:

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting 

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2023 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Balance Sheet

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule
Page 2 of 3

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2023 Reporting

 Reclassified Balance Sheet

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2023 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

 Edits Closing

Part 2 - FY 2024 Reporting changes to files in Sections III, IV, V, and VII:

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2024 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Balance Sheet

 Statement of Net Cost

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2024 Reporting

 Reclassified Balance Sheet

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2024 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

 Edits Closing
Page 3 of 3

4. Effective Date: 

 Part 1 requirements for FY 2023 are effective immediately.

 Part 2 requirements for FY 2024 are effective immediately.

5. Inquiries: 

Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Andrew Morris

Director, General Ledger and Intragovernmental Transaction Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Email: USSGLTeam@fiscal.treasury.gov

Date: March 8, 2023
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 24
                                 POWER OF ATTORNEY

     THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT IRVING WEISER, JOHN C. APPEL
AND DAVID J. PARRIN AND EACH OF THEM HIS TRUE AND LAWFUL ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT AND
AGENTS, WITH FULL POWERS OF SUBSTITUTION AND RESUBSTITUTION, FOR HIM AND IN HIS
NAME, PLACE AND STEAD, IN ANY AND ALL CAPACITIES, TO SIGN AMMENDMENTS TO THE
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF DAIN RAUSCHER CORPORATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1997, AND TO FILE THE SAME WITH ALL EXHIBITS THERETO, AND
OTHER DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION, GRANTING UNTO SAID ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT AND AGENTS, EACH ACTING ALONE,
FULL POWER AND AUTHORITY TO DO AND PERFORM TO ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES AS HE
MIGHT OR COULD DO IN PERSON, HEREBY RATIFYING ALL THAT SAID ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT
AND AGENTS, EACH ACTING ALONE, OR HIS SUBSTITUTES, MAY LAWFULLY DO OR CAUSE TO
BE DONE BY VIRTUE THEREOF.

          SIGNATURE                          DATE
          ---------                          ----


               JOHN C. APPEL                           MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               JOHN C. APPEL


               J. EVANS ATTWELL                        MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               J. EVANS ATTWELL


               SUSAN S. BOREN                          MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               SUSAN S. BOREN


               F. GREGORY FITZ-GERALD                  MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               F. GREGORY FITZ-GERALD


               WALTER F. MONDALE                       MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               WALTER F. MONDALE


               DAVID J. PARRIN                         MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               DAVID J. PARRIN


               C.A. RUNDELL, JR.                       MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               C.A. RUNDELL, JR.


               ROBERT L. RYAN                          MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               ROBERT L. RYAN


               ARTHUR R. SCHULZE, JR.                  MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               ARTHUR R. SCHULZE, JR.


               IRVING WEISER                           MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               IRVING WEISER


               KENNETH J. WESSELS                      MAY 6, 1998    
          ----------------------------       --------------------------
               KENNETH J. WESSELS
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.By:
    MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General PartnerBy:
    /s/ THOMAS W. PERRYName:
    Thomas W. Perry*Title:
    Chief Accounting Officer and Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. Dated:
May 13, 2010
 *
    
    Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 10.1


 


ADDENDUM TO EMPLOYMENT
AGREEMENT


 


This Addendum is made this 2nd
day of July, 2008 by and between Peter Kies (“Employee”), Inovio Biomedical
Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“Inovio”), and Genetronics, Inc., a
California corporation (“Company”), and amends the Employment Agreement (“Employment
Agreement,” a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A to the
Addendum) entered into and effective as of December 15, 2003 between
Employee, Company, and Genetronics Biomedical Corporation, subsequently renamed
as Inovio Biomedical Corporation, with reference to the following facts:


 


WHEREAS, the Employee is
considered by the Board of Directors of the Company to be of value to the
Company and to have skills and abilities and an extensive background in and
knowledge of the industry in which the Company is engaged; and


 


WHEREAS, the Company wishes
to recognize the Employee for his past service and anticipated continued
service to the Company by amending the terms of the Employment Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed
that Section 4.3.4.2(b) of the Employment Agreement shall hereby be
amended to reads as follows:


 


“the amount of compensation
payable under subsection 2.1 of this Agreement for the previous fiscal year
multiplied by three-fourths (3/4);”


 


FURTHER, it is agreed that
in the event that payment is made pursuant to Section 4.3.4 of the
Employment Agreement, payment shall be made in equal monthly installments over
a nine (9) month period;


 


FURTHER, it is agreed that
the following shall be added as Section 4.3.4.2(d):


 


“Health care benefits shall
continue for nine months from the date of termination.  The Company shall either continue Employee on
the Company’s healthcare plan or otherwise secure healthcare benefits for
Employee for the nine-month period.  No
other benefits shall be continued.”


 


In all other aspects the
Employment Agreement remains effective and enforceable as written.  Any conflict between this Addendum and the
Employment Agreement shall be governed by this Addendum.


 


Executed this 2nd day of July,
2008 and effective thereon.


 


INOVIO
BIOMEDICAL CORPORATION


Per:


 


	
  /s/ Jim Heppell

  	
   

  	
   

  



Authorized
Signatory


 


GENETRONICS,
INC.


Per:


 


	
  /s/ Jim Heppell

  	
   

  	
   

  



Authorized
Signatory


 


 


	
  /s/ Peter Kies

  	
   

  	
   

  



PETER
KIES
No. 63071.

#### J. M. Sutton Sons & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/6471 and 58/7205 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protests were filed more than 60 days after liquidation, they were dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Brian R. Ervine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of EvolvingSystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ BRIAN R. ERVINE                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian R. Ervine                                                          |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative  Officer |
| November 8, 2007                                                         |

 

This certificationis furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required bysuch Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification will not bedeemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that wespecifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----