alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 8/23/2023 1

Suit Arising Under State Implementation of the 

Help America Vote Act Remanded to State Court 

Ohio ex rel. Mahal v. Brunner 

(George C. Smith, S.D. Ohio 2:08-cv-983) 

A state’s secretary of state removed a mandamus action filed with 

the state’s supreme court concerning the state’s compliance with 

the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). The district court immediately remanded the case, because the mandamus action sought enforcement of the state’s HAVA-implementing legislation, which 

meant that the case arose under state law. 

Subject: Registration procedures. Topics: Matters for state 

courts; removal; Help America Vote Act (HAVA). 

On Friday, October 17, 2008, an Ohio voter filed a mandamus action with 

Ohio’s supreme court complaining that Ohio’s secretary of state was not 

complying with the Help America Vote Act (HAVA)1 by adequately maintaining a statewide voter-registration database.2

 On Monday, the secretary of 

state removed the action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District 

of Ohio, which assigned the case to Judge George C. Smith.3

Judge Smith remanded the case on the day that it was removed.4 He determined that it was a case arising under state law because the mandamus 

petition sought enforcement of Ohio’s HAVA-implementing legislation.5

1. Pub. L. No. 107-252, 116 Stat. 1666 (2002), as amended, 52 U.S.C. §§ 20901–21145. See 

generally Marie Leary & Robert Timothy Reagan, The Help America Vote Act (Federal Judicial Center 2012); Symposium, HAVA @ 10, 12 Election L.J. 111 (2013). 

2. Mandamus Petition, State ex rel. Mahal v. Brunner, No. 08-2027 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 17, 

2008), filed as Complaint, Ohio ex rel. Mahal v. Brunner, No. 2:08-cv-983 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 

20, 2008), D.E. 4. 

3. Notice of Removal, Mahal, No. 2:08-cv-983 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 20, 2008), D.E. 2. 

Judge Smith died on April 15, 2020. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of 

Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

4. Order, Mahal, No. 2:08-cv-983 (S.D. Ohio Oct. 20, 2008), D.E. 5, 2008 WL 4647701. 

5. Id.
# Data

	&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 8/18/21
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 235 (Wednesday, December 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 76477]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31409]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7657]

Notice of Proposal To Extend the Memorandum of Understanding 
Between the Government of the United States of America and the 
Government of the Republic of Peru Concerning the Imposition of Import 
Restrictions on Archaeological Material From Pre-Hispanic Cultures and 
Certain Ethnological Material From the Colonial Period of Peru

    The Government of the Republic of Peru has informed the Government 
of the United States of America of its interest in an extension of the 
Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the United States 
of America and the Government of the Republic of Peru Concerning the 
Imposition of Import Restrictions on Archaeological Material from Pre-
Hispanic Cultures and Certain Ethnological Material from the Colonial 
Period of Peru (MOU).
    Pursuant to the authority vested in the Assistant Secretary for 
Educational and Cultural Affairs, and pursuant to the requirement under 
19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(1), an extension of this Memorandum of Understanding 
is hereby proposed.
    Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 2602(f)(2), the views and recommendations of 
the Cultural Property Advisory Committee regarding this proposal will 
be requested.
    A copy of the MOU, the Designated List of restricted categories of 
material, and related information can be found at the following Web 
site: http://exchanges.state.gov/heritage/culprop.

    Dated: November 30, 2011.
Adam Ereli,
Acting Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-31409 Filed 12-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Form of Amendment No. 1 to the Trademark License Agreement



 Exhibit 10.29 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO TRADEMARK LICENSE AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 to Trademark
License Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of [                    ], 2008 by and between Morgan Stanley,
a Delaware corporation (“Morgan Stanley”) and MSCI Inc., a Delaware corporation (“MSCI”). 
 RECITALS

 WHEREAS, predecessors of each of Morgan Stanley and MSCI are parties to a Trademark License Agreement dated as of March 18, 2002
(“Trademark License Agreement”) pursuant to which Morgan Stanley grants a trademark license to MSCI; and 
 WHEREAS, Morgan
Stanley and MSCI wish to amend the Trademark License Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Morgan Stanley and MSCI, for themselves, their successors and permitted assigns, hereby agree as follows: 
 Section 1. Defined Terms; References. (a) Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms used herein shall have the meaning given
to those terms in the Trademark License Agreement. Each reference to “hereof”, “hereunder”, “herein”, and “hereby” and each other similar reference and each reference to “this Agreement” and each
other similar reference contained in the Trademark License Agreement shall, after this Amendment becomes effective, refer to the Trademark License Agreement as amended hereby. 
 Section 2. Substantially Owned. The definition of “substantially owned” in Section 1.3 of the Trademark License Agreement is
amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 “substantially owned” means ownership of greater than 50% of the total voting power
to elect directors. 
 Section 3. Continuation of Trademark License Agreement. Except as otherwise modified by this Amendment,
all of the other terms and provisions of the Trademark License Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. 
 Section 4.
Governing Law. This Amendment shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of New York, without regard to the conflicts of laws rules thereof. 
 Section 5. Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective as of the date hereof. 







 Section 6. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, shall constitute one agreement. 
 [Remainder of page
intentionally left blank] 
  

 2 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their respective
authorized officers as of the date first above written. 
  

			
	MORGAN STANLEY
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:	 	
	
	MSCI INC.
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	
	Title:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                         WARNING MODEL MANAGEMENT, INC.
                           (F/K/A FAMOUS FIXINS, INC.)
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 2003


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warning Model  Management,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10QSB/A for the period  ending  September  30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Michael Rudolph,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company and Stanley Tepper,
Chief  Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that,
to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                              /s/  Michael Rudolph
                                              -----------------------------
                                              Michael Rudolph
                                              Chief Executive Officer, President
                                              and Chief Accounting Officer
                                              November 24, 2003
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    Exhibit 22.1

                                SUBSIDIARY LIST

1.     AEG Finance Corp, a Delaware corporation, wholly owned by Maytag Aircraft
       Corporation

2.     Mercury Acceptance Corporation, Inc., a California corporation, wholly
       owned by Mercury Air Group, Inc.

3.     Maytag Aircraft Corporation, a Colorado corporation, wholly owned by
       Mercury Air Group, Inc.

4.     Mercury Air Cargo, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by
       Mercury Air Group, Inc.

5.     Hermes Aviation, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by Mercury
       Air Cargo, Inc.

6.     Pegasus de Mexico S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, owned 99% by
       Mercury Air Cargo, Inc. and 1% by Hermes Aviation, Inc.

7.     Excel Cargo, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by Mercury Air
       Group, Inc.

8.     Vulcan Aviation, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by Mercury
       Air Cargo, Inc.

9.     Maytag Aircraft Corporation, a Cayman corporation, wholly owned by Maytag
       Aircraft Corporation.

10.    Mercury Air Centers, Inc., a California corporation, wholly owned by
       Mercury Air Group, Inc.

11.    Jupiter Airline Automation Services, Inc., a Florida corporation, wholly
       owned by Mercury Air Group, Inc.

12.    RPA Airline Automation Services, Division El Salvador S.A. de C.V., an El
       Salvadorian corporation, 99% owned by RPA Airline Automation Service,
       Inc. and 1% owned by Mercury Air Group, Inc.

13.    Hermes Aviation Canada, Inc., a Canadian corporation, wholly owned by
       Excel Cargo, Inc.

14.    Hermes de Mexico S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation, owned 99% by
       Mercury Air Cargo, Inc. and 1% by Hermes Aviation, Inc.

15.    MercFuel, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, wholly owned by Mercury Air
       Group, Inc.
#### Darrell J. WILLIAMS, a/k/a Abdullah Wajid Sami, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Grace MITCHUM, Librarian at Lieber Correctional Institution; Michael Moore, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 00-6783.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 30, 2001.

Decided April 16, 2001.

Darrell J. Williams, pro se. Peter G. Nistad, Hood Law Firm, Charleston, SC, for appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Darrell J. Williams appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants in his 42 U.S.C.A. *107§ 1983 (West Supp.2000) action.* We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Williams v. Mitchum,*No. CA-98-3033-412BF (D.S.C. filed Mar. 30, 2000; entered Mar. 31, 2000). Furthermore, we deny Williams’ motion to reduce the fees due under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915 (West Supp. 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*

*

 Williams also assigns error to the magistrate judge's orders regarding certain discovery motions. We find no abuse of discretion in the disposition of these motions.
----

Summary of Community decisions on marketing authorizations in respect of medicinal products from 1.7.2006 to 31.7.2006

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC (1)or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC (2))

(2006/C 217/04)

—   Issuing, maintenance or modification of a national marketing authorisation

----

(1)OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67.

(2)OJ L 311, 28.11.2001, p. 1.

----

ANNEX I

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORMS, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTES OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS IN THE MEMBER STATES

----

ANNEX II

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS IN THE MEMBER STATES

----

ANNEX III

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS IN THE MEMBER STATES

----

ANNEX IV

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS IN THE MEMBER STATES

----

ANNEX V

LIST OF THE NAMES, PHARMACEUTICAL FORM, STRENGTHS OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCTS, ROUTE OF ADMINISTRATION, MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDERS IN THE MEMBER STATES

----
No. 64112.

protests 154291-K, etc. (Detroit).

#### Jas. Barclay & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Part 1, Section VI: USSGL Crosswalks to Reclassified 

Statements

This section includes crosswalks for use in Fiscal Year 2023 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map 

USSGL accounts to external reports in accordance with TFM Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 4700, Federal 

Entity Reporting Requirements for the Financial Report of the United States Government. Each report 

crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or column on the 

reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This subsidiary 

information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional information 

on attributes.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by 

Fiscal Service:

Section VI Page Number

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Net Cost (RSNC) VI RSNC - 1

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Operations and 

Changes in Net Position (RSOCNP)

VI RSOCNP - 1

Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This document relates to:

 : CIVIL ACTION

02-4363 RONEY : NO. MDL 875

02-4409 HAMMOND :

02-4410 GRESH :

02-4411 GEARINGER :

02-4413 BRASSILL :

02-4414 FYE :

02-4415 SEARFOSS :

02-4416 SMITH :

02-4479 SMALL :

02-4480 MEYER :

02-4608 BINDER :

02-4658 BINDER :

02-4659 BOULOUS :

02-4730 NEES :

02-4753 CUTHBERT :

02-4754 WILLIAMS :

02-4841 BROWN :

02-5164 WHELAN :

02-5165 MENTZER :

02-5317 MCELHINEY :

02-5318 DELGAUDIO :

02-5319 WAGNER :

02-5891 WALSH :

02-5892 BRAUN :

02-5893 WAGNER :

02-5894 DELGADIO :

O R D E R

The Court having been advised that the issues raised in

each of these actions are also presently pending before the

Honorable District Court Judge Alfred Wolin. Judge Wolin has

been specially designated to sit in the District of Delaware and

preside over these matters. Further, the Judge has set a

schedule and will proceed appropriately. In the interest of

judicial economy and for a prompt resolution of all outstanding

issues this Court will hold its action in abeyance and await the

ruling by the Bankruptcy Court.

Case 2:02-cv-04416-SD Document 4 Filed 08/09/2002 Page 1 of 2
IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that all

pending motions for abstention and remand are denied without

prejudice at this time with leave to renew at a later date. The

cases are administratively dismissed, subject to reinstatement

following the determination of the bankruptcy issues by Judge

Wolin and any subsequent appeals thereto.

Done this 9th day of August, 2002.

 BY THE COURT

 

Charles R. Weiner, SJ

Case 2:02-cv-04416-SD Document 4 Filed 08/09/2002 Page 2 of 2
# UnitedStates Co urt o f Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

November 19, 2003 

### Before Hon . W ILLIAM J. B AUER , Circuit Judge 

### Hon . R ICHARD A. P OSNER , Circuit Judge 

### Hon . F RANK H. E ASTERBROOK , Circuit Judge

P ATRICIA H OLMES , Plaintiff-Appellee , And U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA , Intervening Plaintiff-Appellee , 

### No . 02-1377 v. MARION C OUNTY O FFICE OF F AMILY AND C HILDREN , Defendant-Appellant . Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division. No. IP 00-0677-C-M/S Larry J. McKinney, Chief Judge .

Order The opinion of this court issued on November 19, 2003, is amended as follows: Page 1, line 5, change “an banc” to “en banc”.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Delete an Accounting Code

To enter an accounting code, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, select Manage Organizations>Accounting Codes>Modify. 

The Step 1 of 3: Select OTC Endpoint page appears.

2. Select the organization endpoint for the accounting codes you wish to delete. The Step 2 of 

3: Update Accounting Codes page appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Step 2 of 3: Update Accounting Codes

If an Agency Accounting Code label is customized, it is displayed as the label above 

the imported or modified codes within the Maintain Accounting Codes module, according 

to the custom label that was defined for the highest-level organization. Within the rest of 

the application, custom labels apply to deposit processing functionalities, but are not 

extended to check processing functionalities. The default accounting code label is 

Agency Accounting Code.

3. Check the Delete box for the accounting code(s) you want to delete.

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• By default, the first 50 accounting codes display in ascending numerical order.

• If an OTC Endpoint has more than 50 accounting codes, click the pagination menu 

above the section containing the existing accounting codes to view additional pages 

of results.

• An accounting code is not eligible for deletion if it is associated with a transaction 

within an active or deactivated batch that is Open, Closed, or Approved. Additionally, 

an accounting code is not eligible for deletion if it is associated with a deposit that is 

in Draft or Awaiting Approval (AWAP) status. An error message is displayed if these 

scenarios occur.

4. Click Next. The Step 3 of 3: Review Accounting Codes page appears. 

5. Verify the information is correct and click Submit. A Confirmation page appears showing the 

accounting code has been deleted/saved for the organization.

Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

Application Tips

Additional Button
S. 3938 

One Hundred Eighteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four 

An Act 

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, as the ‘‘Private First Class Desmond T. Doss 

VA Clinic’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PRIVATE FIRST CLASS DESMOND T. DOSS 

VA CLINIC IN LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA. 

(a) IN GENERAL.— The community-based outpatient clinic of 

the Department of Veterans Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, shall 

after the date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated 

as the ‘‘Private First Class Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic’’. 

(b) REFERENCE.—Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the clinic 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference 

to the Private First Class Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-02	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout November 30, 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      16,267,116
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,056,983
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,296,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (4,372,748)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,056,983
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,238,098
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             105,139
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,343,237)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,343,237)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,343,237)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.065)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.065)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NORMAN TIMOTHY GREGORY, No. CIV S-04-0764 FCD DAD P

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME

v. FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE

AND SERVE MOTION FOR

D. RAMEREZ, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants.

 /

Defendants’ request for an extension of time to file and serve a motion for

summary judgment was considered by this court, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ January 20, 2006 request for extension of time is granted; and

2. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment shall be filed and served on or

before February 20, 2006.

DATED: January 23, 2006.

/greg0764.dispmotext

Case 2:04-cv-00764-FCD-DAD Document 37 Filed 01/23/06 Page 1 of 1