alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80779-80780]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25626]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory 
Committee (#13883) (Virtual).
    Date and Time: December 15, 2023; 12:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m.
    Place: National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, 
Alexandria, VA 22314 (Zoom Videoconference).
    Attendance information for the meeting will be forthcoming on the 
website: https://www.nsf.gov/mps/ast/aaac.jsp.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Carrie Black, Program Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, Suite W 9188, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-2426.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and Space

[[Page 80780]]

Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on issues 
within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of mutual 
interest and concern to the agencies. To prepare the annual report.
    Agenda: To provide updates on Agency activities and to discuss the 
Committee's draft annual report due 15 March 2024.

    Dated: November 15, 2023.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-25626 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Chapter 6. Viewing Financial InstitutionsOTCnet Participant User Guide

****
Chapter 4 Managing Your Agency's Hierarchy Accounting Codes and Processing Options

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

	Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Chapter 6. Viewing Financial Institutions

Check Capture and Check Processing

User guide section												

Table of Contents

Overview, Topics, and Audience1

Overview1

Topics1

Audience1

Topic 1 View a Financial Institution2

View a Financial Institution3

Summary5

List of Figures

Figure 1. View FRB Detail3

Figure 2. View Financial Institution Detail4

****

Glossary

Click this link to access the full OTCnet Glossary.

1									         User Guide Category category								

1

	Administration

## Overview, Topics, and Audience

### Overview

Welcome to *Viewing Financial Institutions.* In this chapter, you will learn:

How to view a Financial Instruction 

### Topics

The topic in this chapter is: Viewing Financial Institutions

### Audience

The intended audience for the *Viewing Financial Institutions*Participant User Guide includes:

Financial Institution (FI) Confirmer

Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) Confirmer

FI Viewer

FRB Viewer

## Topic 1 View a Financial Institution

**Financial Institution** (**FI) Confirmers**, **Federal Reserve Bank (FRB)****Confirmers**, **FI Viewers** and **FRB Viewers**are authorized to locate and view the financial institution details. You can only view a financial institution with an **Active**status.

Viewing a Financial Institution allows you to see related details, including the following:

Institute Information

Routing Transit Numbers (RTN) and Status

CA$HLINK II Account Number (CAN)/Account Key Relationships 

View a Financial Institution

To view a Financial Institution (FI), complete the following steps:

1. From **Administration**, select **Manage FI**>**Financial Institution**>**View**. 

The *View the Financial Institution*page appears. View details for Financial Institutions as shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2.

Figure 1. View FRB Detail

Figure 2. View Financial Institution Detail

Application Tip

**FI Confirmers,****Federal Reserve Bank** (**FRB) Confirmers**, **FI Viewers**, and **FRB Viewers** are authorized to view Institution Information, Routing Transit Numbers (RTN) and Status and CAN/Acct Key Relationships.

Additional Button

Click **Return Home** to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

## Summary

In this chapter, you learned how to view a Financial Institution.

# image1.jpg

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.emf

# image5.emf

# image5.png

# image7.png
Before the Third Division,

August 17, 1949

No. 53506.

protest 58552-K (New York).

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-3      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 1 of 9

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-3      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 2 of 9

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-3      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 3 of 9

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-3      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 4 of 9

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-3      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 5 of 9

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-3      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 6 of 9

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-3      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 7 of 9

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-3      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 8 of 9

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-3      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 9 of 9
No. 50414.

#### Protests 992930-G, etc., of S. S. Kresge Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DESMON LOEB,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0730 LKK PAN P

vs.

T. FELKER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On May 22, 2006, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

judge’s order filed May 4, 2006, denying plaintiff’s November 2, 2005 motion for discovery. 

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 72-303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless

“clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does

not appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of

the magistrate judge filed May 4, 2006, is affirmed. 

DATED: July 25, 2006.

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/loeb0730.850

Case 2:04-cv-00730-LKK -EFB Document 62 Filed 07/25/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas W. Perry, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Merrill Lynch
& Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ THOMAS W. PERRY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Thomas W. Perry*
                              Title:   Chief Accounting Officer and Controller
                                       Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: August 14, 2009
----------------------

*  Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the accompanying Form 10-K of PG&E National Energy
Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Thomas Legro, Vice President
and Controller of PG&E National Energy Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (3) |  | such Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (4) |  | the information contained in such Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of PG&E National Energy Group, Inc.



|                    |  |                                            |  | 
|------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------ |  | 
|Date: March 5, 2003 |  | /s/ Thomas Legro                           |  | 
|                    |  |                                            |  | 
|                    |  | Thomas Legro
Vice President and Controller |  |
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT Fiscal Year 2017 Reporting

Section VII

Draft Bulletin No. 2017-04 VII VDR - 1 IRC Handout 03-02-17

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

24E Reporting Type Code

The USSGL Accounts must be valid for the 

Reporting Type Code.

USSGL 

ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

REPORTING 

TYPE CODE

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass 340000 U 020 X6311000

32E

Is First Year and Year of Budget Authority 

Indicator Validation

If Is First Year is Y, then Year of BA must be 

NEW. If Is First Year is N, then Year of BA 

must be BAL for annual & multiyear TAS 

when using PYA of X, and can be NEW or BAL 

for X year TAS and for annual & multiyear TAS 

when using PYA B or P.

YEAR OF 

BUDGET 

AUTHORITY 

CODE IS FIRST YEAR

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0228000

44E USSGLs limited to X Authority Duration Code

Specific USSGLs are limited to TAS with 

Authority Duration Code X (No Year TAS).

USSGL 

ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

AUTHORITY 

TYPE

BEA CATEGORY 

INDICATOR

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Reducti

on Type

Pass 438400 S M

07520162017 

0943000 SEQ

Pass 438400 S M

07520142014 

0511000 SEQ

Pass 438400 S M

07520162016 

0511000 SEQ

Pass 438400 S M

07520162021 

0511000 SEQ

71

Limited use of specific USSGL and Fund Type 

combinations with Authority Type Code "S"

The use of USSGL 438200 with Fund Types 

"ES/ET", or USSGL 438400 with Fund Type 

"ES", and Authority Type Code "S" is limited 

to specific TAS. Fail

USSGL 

ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

AUTHORITY 

TYPE FUND TYPE

=438400 =S =ET

71E

Limited use of specific USSGL and Fund Type 

combinations with Authority Type Code "S"

The use of USSGL 438200 with Fund Types 

"ES/ET", or USSGL 438400 with Fund Type 

"ES", and Authority Type Code "S" is limited 

to specific TAS.

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass 060 X8051001

77E Financing Account Code

The USSGL account must be valid for the 

Financing Account Code assigned to the TAS.

USSGL 

ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass 417000 091 X4300000

84

Limited Use of USSGL 419000 with Financing 

Account Code "G"

The use of USSGL account 419000 with 

Financing Account Code "G" is limited to 

specific TAS. Fail

USSGL 

ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

FINANCING 

ACCOUNT 

CODE

=419000 =G

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT Fiscal Year 2017 Reporting

Section VII

Draft Bulletin No. 2017-04 VII VDR - 2 IRC Handout 03-02-17

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

84E

Limited Use of USSGL 419000 with Financing 

Account Code "G"

The use of USSGL account 419000 with 

Financing Account Code "G" is limited to 

specific TAS.

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass 086 X4240000
EXHIBIT 21  Jostens, Inc. subsidiaries as of March 1,
2003  Name of
  Company
  
  Jurisdiction of IncorporationJostens
  Canada Ltd.
  
  CanadaJostens Can
  Investments B.V.
  
  The
  NetherlandsJostens
  International Holding B.V.
  
  The
  NetherlandsC.V. Jostens
  Global Trading
  
  The
  NetherlandsJC Trading,
  Inc.
  
  Puerto RicoConceptos
  Jostens, S.A. de C.V.
  
  MexicoReconocimientos
  E Incentivos, S.A. de C.V.
  
  Mexico
No. 56375.

protests 177024-K and 177455-K (New York).

#### The Kopf Manufacturing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of saddles, which saddles are in part of pigskin and valued at more than $40 each, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 54419, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Richard Alan Haase v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.; et.al. and

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00854

- CV

Trial court case number: 07

- DCV

- 161177

Trial court: 400th District Court of Fort Bend County

On A p ril 13, 2021, a ppellants, RICHARD ALAN HAASE and Richard Alan Haase , filed

a Motion for Trial Court to State Findings of Fact and Conclusions of La w in connection with

the trial co urt ’s summary judgments of February 20, 2019 and March 7, 2019 and the trial

court ’s judgment nunc pro tu n c of December 1, 2020.

A p pellants are not entitled to the requested relief. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 296. We deny the

motion.

O n A p ril 28, 2021, A ppe llant s filed a n original and an A mended Motion for Ruling and

Request for Extension o f Time to File Principal B rief seeking a ruling on their April 13 , 2021

Motion and “ an extension of time to file [their] principal brief. ” W e deny Appellants ’ Motion

for Rulin g as moot and grant appellants ’ Request for Extension of Time.

Appellant s ’ brief is due June 3, 2021.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge ’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas

- Molloy

Acting individually

Date: May 4, 2021
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHAWN HAWK, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0731 MCE CMK P

vs.

ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On June 23, 2006, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the

complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendants Cook and Chettham was returned

unserved because “CDC locator unable to locate (no info).” Plaintiff must provide additional

information to serve these defendants. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through

discovery, the California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov’t. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means

available to plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or unreasonably delayed,

plaintiff may seek judicial intervention. Once additional information sufficient to effect service

is obtained, plaintiff shall notify the court whereupon plaintiff will be forwarded the forms

Case 2:04-cv-00731-MCE -CMK Document 26 Filed 09/13/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

necessary for service by the U.S. Marshal. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to provide the court

with information necessary to effect service may result in the dismissal of unserved defendants. 

See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall promptly seek

additional information sufficient to effect service on any unserved defendants and notify the

court once such information is ascertained. 

DATED: September 12, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00731-MCE -CMK Document 26 Filed 09/13/06 Page 2 of 2
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4050 

To extend the deadline to commence construction of certain hydroelectric 

projects on the Red River. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline to commence construction of certain 

hydroelectric projects on the Red River. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE TO COMMENCE CON4 STRUCTION OF CERTAIN HYDROELECTRIC 

5 PROJECTS ON THE RED RIVER. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

7 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to Federal Energy 

9 Regulatory Commission projects numbered P–12756 and 

10 P–13160, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (reVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:03 Mar 22, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4050.CPS S4050

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4050 CPS

1 ferred to in this section as the ‘‘Commission’’) may, at 

2 the request of the licensee for the applicable project, and 

3 after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, 

4 due diligence, and public interest requirements of that sec5 tion and the procedures of the Commission under that sec6 tion, extend the time period during which each licensee 

7 is required to commence construction of the applicable 

8 project for one year from the date of the expiration of 

9 the extension most recently issued by the Commission 

10 under that section for the applicable project. 

11 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

12 time period required under section 13 of the Federal 

13 Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) for commencement of con14 struction of a project described in subsection (a) expires 

15 before the date of enactment of this Act— 

16 (1) the Commission may reinstate the license 

17 for the applicable project effective as of the date of 

18 expiration of the license; and 

19 (2) the extension authorized under subsection 

20 (a) shall take effect on the date of that expiration. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tongli Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Li Li, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 22, 2010
By:
/s/ Li LiName: Li LiTitle: Chief Financial Officer(principal accounting officer)
Exhibit 32.1 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 Of The United States Code I, J. Patrick Spainhour, the
Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fully
complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of The ServiceMaster Company. /s/ J. Patrick SpainhourJ. Patrick SpainhourChief Executive OfficerAugust 9, 2007 A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The
ServiceMaster Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 51
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 5/2/2023 1

Eligibility of a Removed Judge 

to Run for His Own Vacated Seat 

Jefferson v. Louisiana Supreme Court 

(Robert G. James, W.D. La. 3:00-cv-2200) 

A judge removed by the state’s supreme court for judicial conduct 

filed a federal complaint challenging his exclusion from an election 

to fill his vacant seat. The district judge determined that the federal 

court lacked jurisdiction to review a state court’s judgment. 

Subject: Getting on the ballot. Topics: Getting on the ballot; 

matters for state courts; primary election. 

On September 27, 2000, a Louisiana judge for the City Court of Monroe, Parish of Ouachita—who was removed from office for judicial misconduct by 

the state’s supreme court—and four additional voters filed a federal complaint in the Western District of Louisiana challenging removal of the judge 

from the ballot for a primary election to fill his seat.1 With their complaint, 

the plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction.2

Judge Robert G. James set the case for hearing on October 5.3 Following 

the hearing, Judge James determined that the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, 

which states that among federal courts only the Supreme Court has appellate 

jurisdiction over state-court proceedings, deprived the plaintiffs of relief.4

Moreover, “This Court agrees with the conclusion of the Louisiana Supreme 

Court that a judge removed from office because of misconduct cannot then 

run in a special election to fill the remainder of his term.”5

In 2006, Louisiana’s supreme court restored the judge’s eligibility for judicial office.6

 He was again elected to the bench in 2007.7

1. Complaint, Jefferson v. La. Supreme Ct., No. 3:00-cv-2200 (W.D. La. Sept. 27, 2000), 

D.E. 1; see Supplemental Complaint, id. (Sept. 29, 2000), D.E. 4; see also In re Jefferson, 753 

So. 2d 181 (La. 2000). 

2. Motion, Jefferson, No. 3:00-cv-2200 (W.D. La. Sept. 27, 2000), D.E. 2. 

3. Supplemental Order, id. (Oct. 2, 2000), D.E. 9 (denying an ex parte temporary restraining order); Order, id. (Oct. 2, 2000), D.E. 8 (same); see Minutes, id. (Oct. 5, 2000), D.E. 

11. 

4. Opinion at 7–8, id. (Oct. 5, 2000, filed Oct. 6, 2000), D.E. 6; see D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. 

Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923); Martin A. 

Schwartz, Section 1983 Litigation 21–24 (Federal Judicial Center 3d ed. 2014); see also Ousted Judge Fails in Try to Stop Election, Baton Rouge Advocate, Oct. 7, 2000, at 8-B. 

5. Opinion, supra note 4, at 8–9. 

6. In re Jefferson, 927 So. 2d 1103 (La. 2006); see Robbie Evans, Jefferson Eligible for Judicial Office, Monroe News-Star, Apr. 19, 2006, at 1A. 

7. See Elizabeth Fitch, Jefferson to Don Robes of City Court, Monroe News-Star, Nov. 18, 

2007, at 13a.