alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CRAFT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CIV S-04-0780 MCE KJM PS

JAMES ROCHE,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a second

amended complaint. Attached to the second amended complaint are 61 pages of exhibits. In

addition, a cassette tape has been submitted the court. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall obtain one USM-285 form for each defendant named in the

complaint, one summons for each defendant and an instruction sheet. Blank USM-285 forms ,

blank summons, and instruction sheets are available in the office of the Clerk of the Court.

2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the completed Notice to the court with

the following documents:

a. One completed summons for the defendant named in the complaint;

Case 2:04-cv-00780-MCE -KJM Document 12 Filed 04/26/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

b. One completed USM-285 form for the defendant named in the

complaint; and 

c. Two copies of the endorsed complaint and exhibits filed January 27,

2005. 

3. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States

Marshal to serve the defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4 without

prepayment of costs. 

4. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this

action be dismissed.

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to maintain in the court’s paper file the cassette

submitted in this matter and record on the docket the filing of said cassette tape.

DATED: April 25, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

006

craft.usm

Case 2:04-cv-00780-MCE -KJM Document 12 Filed 04/26/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ANTHONY CRAFT,

Plaintiff, 

vs. CIV S-04-0780 MCE KJM PS

JAMES ROCHE,

Defendant. NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 completed summons form

 completed USM-285 forms

 copies of the Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-00780-MCE -KJM Document 12 Filed 04/26/05 Page 3 of 3
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Financial Officer of
American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. (the Company), that the Quarterly
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at
the end of the period covered by the Report and the results of operations of
the Company for the period covered by the Report.



| | By: /s/ Alan Goldstein
Alan Goldstein
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 12, 2003
No. 57991.

protest 200312-K (Los Angeles).

#### Young’s Market Co. and John L. Westland & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantity reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
<PAGE>
                                                                     Exhibit 4.8

                                              Translation dated October 22, 2003

Non-binding English translation from the German original
Only the German version is legally binding

                   CANCELLATION AGREEMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE
                     PRINCIPLES OF COOPERATION OF MAY 2000

between

ALLIANZ AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, MUNICH,
referred to in the following as ALLIANZ,

and

MUNCHENER RUCKVERSICHERUNGS-GESELLSCHAFT
AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT IN MUNCHEN, MUNICH
referred to in the following as MUNICH RE

1. TERMINATION OF PRINCIPLES OF COOPERATION OF MAY 2000

Munich Re and Allianz agree to cancel the Principles of Cooperation of May 2000
with effect for the end of the year 2003. All obligations resulting from the
Principles of Cooperation shall be cancelled, including in particular such
obligations that are prescribed therein as consequence of termination of the
Principles of Cooperation.

Other existing agreements, namely individual reinsurance contracts as well as
the agreement regarding quotas of December 2001 in the currently valid form are
not affected by this cancellation agreement.

2. CONCLUDING REMARK

If particular provisions of this agreement are invalid, the validity of the
remaining provisions of this agreement shall not be affected thereby.

In such a case, the invalid provision shall be reinterpreted or supplemented in
order to obtain the intended economic purpose in a legally permissible way.

3. ARBITRATION TRIBUNAL

All disagreements resulting from this Agreement shall be adjudicated by an
arbitration tribunal in accordance with the separate arbitration agreement
entered into between Allianz and Munich Re in May 2000.

Munich, October 2003


Allianz Aktiengesellschaft             Munchener Ruckversicherungs-Gesellschaft
                                       Aktiengesellschaft in Munchen



signature                              signature
Diekmann               Bremkamp        Schinzler               Heyd
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Registration Statement 33-40233 and 333-83649) and the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Statement 2-95076, 33-19308, 33-58414,
333-00713, 333-13221, 333-13223, 333-56455 and 333-72347), of our report dated
February 2, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Jostens, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K), and our report
included in the following paragraph with respect to the financial statement
schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Jostens, Inc. for the
year ended January 1, 2000.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of Jostens, Inc.
listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.



                             /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                             ---------------------



Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 6, 2000
**EXHIBIT 31(ii)****CERTIFICATION**I, Richard M. Hewitt, CFO do hereby certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of MBI Financial, Inc.     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport.     4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14)for the registrant and have:     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared;     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to thefiling date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date:     5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data andhave identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal controls; and     6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual reportwhether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.Date:January 29, 2007                    /s/ Richard M. Hewitt    Richard M. Hewitt,   Chief Financial Officer
United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

United States District Court

For the Northern District of California

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TASH HEPTING, et al,

Plaintiffs,

v

AT&T CORPORATION, et al,

Defendants. /

No C-06-672 VRW

ORDER

Defendant AT&T Corp (“AT&T”) has moved to stay further

proceedings pending appeal. Doc #324. Based on the parties’

motions, Doc ##317, 315, 324, and oral arguments, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

All further proceedings in this litigation shall be

stayed until September 29, 2006. The court also directs the

parties on or before September 15, 2006, to apprise the court by

memoranda not to exceed five pages of any developments in the

interlocutory appeal motions of the government and AT&T affecting

or relating to this case and the status of 28 USC § 1407 transfers

pursuant to MDL 1791. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

VAUGHN R WALKER

United States District Chief Judge

Case 3:06-cv-00672-VRW Document 336 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case No. 7,852.

#### KISSAM v. The ALBERT.

[21 Law Rep. 41.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

May, 1858.

Collision.

When the connection of a vessel with a collision is wholly passive, and she has in no way, by her voluntary action, contributed to it, no decided case or recognized principle of the sea laws is known which subjects her to responsibility for its consecraences. As where the collision is caused by the swell raised by a passing steamer, and no fault or negligence of the libelled vessel is shown to have contributed to the damage.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Welwind Energy International Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Tammy-Lynn McNabb, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Tammy-Lynn
      McNabbTammy-Lynn
      McNabb
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                April
      4, 2008
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Modify a Custom Label

To modify a custom field label, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, click Manage Organizations>Custom Labels>Modify. The 

Select OTC Endpoint page appears.

2. Select the organization endpoint for which you want to modify custom labels. The Step 1 of 

2: Update Custom Labels appears. 

3. Update the custom labels for the organization hierarchy and click Next. The Step 2 of 2: 

Review Custom Labels page appears as shown in Figure 1. 

Figure 1. Step 2 of 2: Review Custom Labels

• If an Agency Accounting Code label is customized, it is displayed as the label above 

the imported or modified codes within the Maintain Accounting Codes module, 

according to the custom label that was defined for the highest-level organization.

• Within the rest of the application, custom labels apply to deposit processing 

functionalities, but are not extended to check processing functionalities. 

• The default accounting code label is Agency Accounting Code.

4. Verify the information is correct and click Submit. A Confirmation page appears presenting 

the custom labels modified for the organization hierarchy.

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Printing a User List

To print a user list, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, select User Administration>Manage Users. The Step 1 of 2 

Select a User page appears.

2. Select Print User List as shown in Figure 1. 

Figure 1. Step 1 of 2: Select a User (Print User List)

3. The Print User List preview page appears. Under Export as, you have the following options: 

• Select PDF, Word or Excel 

• Select Download

Or

• Select Print PDF Report

Select Previous to return to the View User Profile List for that terminal.

Additional Button
Exhibit 32.1


 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I,  Jonathan  P.  Ward,  the  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive   Officer  of  The
ServiceMaster  Company,  certify that (i) the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2004,  fully  complies with  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information
contained  in such Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                                       /S/ JONATHAN P. WARD
                                       --------------------
                                       Jonathan P. Ward
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                       August 9, 2004


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster  Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.







                                       29
<PAGE>
# sec6_rsonp_2021

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSOCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BAugust 2021
No. 62539.

#### Richter Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 326587-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fried herring similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Richter Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 128, C. A. D. 649), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,644
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,504
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,040
<INVENTORY>                                     24,337
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                79,864
<PP&E>                                          56,326
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,605
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,415
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,687
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,334
<SALES>                                        128,018
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               150,571
<CGS>                                           72,155
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   88,126
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   163
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,684
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,689
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,995
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-6235
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOSEPH A. BOONE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-227-H, CA-96-3683) Submitted: July 10, 1997 Decided: July 23, 1997 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph A. Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion andfind no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Boone , Nos. CR-95-227-H; CA-96-3683 (D. Md. Jan. 22, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Install OTCnet Offline Check Capture Software

To install the OTCnet Offline Check Capture software, complete the following steps:

1. Locate the folder on the workstation where the OTCnet Offline zip file resides, e.g., your 

Downloads folder. Double select the zip file. Double-click the EXE file. The Welcome to 

OTCnet Offline QA Setup program dialog box appears.

The EXE must be launched and executed by a Windows Administrator.

2. Select Next. The Destination Location dialog box appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Destination Location Dialog Box

• To install the software to another folder destination, select Browse to select a 

different folder. 

• Select Back to go back.

• Select Cancel to exit the setup.

3. Select Next. The Start Installation dialog box appears.

4. Select Next. The Server Port Settings dialog box appears. 

5. Select Next. The Installing dialog box appears. Wait a moment while the files install.

Application Tips

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• The Server Port Settings are pre-populated with the default values.

• If your location has specific Server Port Settings, enter the Server Start Port, 

Server Stop Port details, Server HTTPS Port, and Server Monitor Port

details.

6. The message “OTCnet Offline X.X.X has been successfully installed” appears. Select 

Finish. The OTCnet Offline icon appears on your desktop.

• The Offline Installer verifies that Java is installed on the workstation.

• If Java is not installed, you will receive a “Java must be installed for the Offline to 

function. The JAVA_HOME environment variable must also be set pointing to the 

main Java installation folder” message as shown in Figure 2. A Windows 

Administrator must install Java.

Figure 2. Java message

Application Tips

Application Tip
No. 50411.

#### Protests 877765-G, etc., of International Harvest Hat Co. et al. (St. Louis, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 50404.

#### Protest 98772-K of Italian Furniture Frame Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

From the evidence produced it was not clear to the court just what items were short shipped on one invoice and added to another invoice. Upon the record the court was unable to find that the collector erred in his assessment. The protest was therefore overruled.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-4 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 1

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 55 Att. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
No. 53495.

protests 135615-K/1449, etc. (Chicago).

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the crude curare passed upon in Abstract 52532. The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.