alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William Scigliano, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of IQ Biometrix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant is made known to us by others
within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 6, 2004


                                /s/ William Scigliano
                                ---------------------------
                                William Scigliano
                                Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have issued our report dated November 3, 2000 accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Innovex, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 2000. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Innovex, Inc. on
Forms S-8 (File No. 33-14776, effective June 3, 1987, File No. 33-27530,
effective March 17, 1989, File No. 33-59035, effective May 2, 1995, File No.
333-10045, effective August 12, 1996, File No. 333-10047, effective August 12,
1996, File No. 333-79427, effective May 27, 1999 and File No. 333-37380,
effective May 19, 2000.)





                                       \s\ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 14, 2000


                                      E-43
Before the Second Division,

July 12, 1944

No. 49618.

#### Protest 837288-G of Absorbo Beer Pad Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is of the same dutiable character as that in *Absorbo Beer Pad Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 176, C. D. 748). In accordance therewith the protest was sustained.
Before the First Division,

October 9, 1951

No. 55912.

protests 898408-G (A), etc. (New York).

#### Banner Bead Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 10368)

Entry No. 27562, etc.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided November 8, 1962)

*Stein*<6 *ShostaJc*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

JohNsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties.:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, consists of Christmas tree light sets, exported from Japan ; and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of • trade. *443for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs' Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> . IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the. appeals for reap-praisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for a decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, TO Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination, of the value of the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisemeht enumerated in the attached schedule and that such values are the invoice unit values, net, packed.

* Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00237-CV

James L. Mundie Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

From the 211th District Court

of Denton County (F-2001-0224-C)

December 22, 2016

Opinion by Justice Meier

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 09/08 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.11 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Brian
Chaiken, Chief Financial Officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my
knowledge:




(1)           The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.




Dated:  September
      15, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Brian
      ChaikenBrian
      ChaikenChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
No. 50006.

#### Protests 62738-K, etc., of Charles T. Smith, Inc., et al. (New York).

’Keefe, Judge:

This case involves the classification'of certain grind or grinding stones imported from Scotland. The merchandise was assessed for duty at 30 percent ad valorem under paragraph 214, Tariff Act of 1930. The plaintiffs claim that the merchandise is free of duty under paragraph 1692, as whetstones.

At the trial the importer testified that the Tam O’Shanter octagon grinding stones he imports range in size between 5-8 inches across the face and from 2)4, 3 vto 5 inches thiek, and that said diameter is not less than 5 inches nor over 8 inches. After examining the sample produced in the case of *Stein*v. *United States,*6 Cust. Ct. 443, C. D. 511, the witness testified that the stones he imports are exactly the same except for size. He further testified that the stones covered by protests 110263-K, 22522-K, and 113059-K, invoiced as solid Tam O’Shanter grinding stones, were in fact octagonal in shape, 6-8 inches in diameter, and 3-5 inches thick. The record in *Rhodes*v. *United States,*Abstract 49359 (which included the *Stein*case, *supra),*was incorporated with and made a part of the record herein, the merchandise having been establisned to be the same.

In the *Rhodes*case, *supra,*the merchandise involved consisted of Tam O’Shariter octagon sharpening hones, 7)4-8 inches in diameter by 3-4 inches thick, Tam O’Shanter joiners hones, 6-7 inches by 2 inches by *%-l*inch, and Tam O’Shanter octagon blocks, 7)4-8 inches in diameter x 3-4 inches thick. The testimony in that case also established that where the invoices called for Tam O’Shanter octagon 'blocks measuring 8-10 inches in diameter x 2)4-4 inches thick, 25 percent or more thereof consisted of blocks measuring 8 inches or less in diameter. The court there held that the merchandise involved in that case was free of duty as whet stones upon evidence establishing that stones measuring up to and including 8 'inches in diameter and up to and including 5 inches thick were chiefly used as whetstones rather than as polishing stones in textile works or by rotogravure printers.

Upon the evidence here presented and following the incorporated case we hold that insofar as the merchandise as invoiced herein consists of octogan Tam O’Shanter grinding stones, or grindstones, or as solid Tam O’Shanter grinding stones, the same is free of duty under paragraph 1692, as whetstones. The collector will reliquidate the entries and make refund of all duty taken upon said merchandise. In all other respects the protests are overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,240,190
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,172,904
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                         136,524,047
<DEPRECIATION>                                  95,613,778
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,585,976
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,585,976
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,607,757
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,821,039
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    14,913
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,690,344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,726,836
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:05-cv-04983-RB Document 105 Filed 11/13/2008 Page 13 of 13
No. 50947.

#### Protests 12061-K, etc., of Jos. Riedel Glass Works, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorites cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Room A/C Standby Testing

4/25/2008

Inactive Mode

(No display showing, waiting to receive signal from remote)

Voltage (V) Power (W)

123.74 0.6873123.51 0.6881123.52 0.6777123.72 0.654123.23 0.6844123.67 0.6773123.35 0.6606123.32 0.6832123.74 0.6996123.75 0.6678

Delay-start Mode V

D

Voltage (V) Power (W) Voltage (V) Power (W) Voltage (V) Power (W) Voltage (V) Power (W)

123.83 0.7758 123.65 0.8429 123.81 0.8944 123.51 0.9364 A

123.82 0.7875 123.64 0.8608 123.73 0.8823 123.75 0.939 M123.76 0.7816 123.64 0.8611 123.74 0.8958 123.82 0.9614 M123.65 0.7804 123.8 0.8556 123.76 0.9114 123.23 0.9376 ∆ 

123.53 0.7722 123.87 0.8472 123.33 0.8948 123.65 0.9382123.65 0.8429 123.79 0.8527 123.62 0.8896 123.71 0.951123.64 0.8608 123.82 0.8741 123.79 0.8935 123.59 0.9502123.64 0.8611 123.84 0.8666 123.8 0.8955 123.76 0.9381

123.8 0.8556 123.49 0.8575 123.72 0.8932 123.87 0.9481

123.87 0.8472 123.62 0.8553 123.73 0.9013 123.79 0.94

Fan-Only Mode (w/o front grille)

Voltage (V) Power (W) Voltage (V) Power (W)

123.43 105.41 123.41 114.59

123.6 105.54 123.57 114.86

123.44 105.27 123.66 114.87123.59 105.34 123.26 114.35122.99 104.29 123.49 114.67123.36 104.91 123.67 114.87

123.4 104.88 123.63 114.71

123.55 104.94 123.31 114.22123.22 104.46 123.47 114.4

123.61 104.9 123.54 114.62

1 hr display 5 hr display 8 hr display 10 hr display

Lo Med

 EERE-2008-BT-TP-0010 COMMENT 01
Off-Cycle

Voltage (V) Power (W) Voltage (V) Power (W)

123.16 1.0286 123.23 0.9117123.41 1.0299 123.5 0.9024

123.51 1.0289 123.39 0.903123.51 1.0317 123.53 0.9121123.48 1.0386 123.22 0.9078123.52 1.0266 123.41 0.9072123.05 1.041 122.92 0.89123.53 1.0301 123.43 0.9021122.97 1.0378 123.42 0.9039123.18 1.0317 123.42 0.9152

Fan-Only Mode (w/ front grille)

Voltage (V) Power (W) Voltage (V) Power (W) Voltage (V) Power (W)

123.01 100.59 122.1 110.22 122.28 124.07

122.93 100.44 122.09 110.32 122.23 123.98122.92 100.39 122.04 110.24 122.22 123.88123.08 100.4 121.8 109.89 121.91 123.58

122.81 100.08 121.98 110.16 122.009 123.89122.48 99.68 122.12 110.3 122.41 124.13

122.85 100.1 121.93 109.83 122.09 123.68123.05 100.28 121.93 109.96 122.16 123.8122.76 99.89 121.67 109.53 122.26 124.1123.07 100.26 122.15 110.26 122.39 124.26

Hi

T=65 T=71

Lo Med

 EERE-2008-BT-TP-0010 COMMENT 01
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT
TO
  SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  I, Andrew
Stewart, the President, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer
of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I
L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the
Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
     Date: May 15,
      2009
              /s/ Andrew
      StewartAndrew
      StewartPresident and
      Chief Executive Officer
   
   
        E-4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PAULL

: CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-4461

KEMPER INC., et al.

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 3rd day of February, 2004,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Sheila M. Jeffers 

 Deputy Clerk

Civ 2 (8/2000)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-04461-CRW Document 15 Filed 02/03/2004 Page 1 of 1
No. 57979.

protest 101325-K (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the Western white spruce lumber the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 13, C. D. 1538), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.
No. 59512.

protests 170148-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**
**FAA -**  **2014 -**  **0579** Docket Number
**2014 -**  **SW -**  **020 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket - NPRM Agusta W estland S.p.A. Bollettino Tecnico (BT) No. 109S - 49, BT No. 109SP - 052, and BT No. 119 - 50, all Revision A, and all dated December 3, 2013


### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 260 1 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Adventure 

X J L TRAVEL & CRUISE CENTER 

Uii) ; 

February 24, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's 

application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International 

Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last 

December in reaching a landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up 

Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New 

York and Los Angeles to Hafieda in order to provide an essential connection between 

three of the world's largest fmancral and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld Alliance 

membership, have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific 

market. American is likewise committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal 

points of business, trade, entertainment, technology and education - providing 

unsaf|3assed air service since the mid-1900s 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain signiificant economic benefits 

from these proposed new flights, as will. American's customers and employees. 

However, we need your help to make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a reality. , 
Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to 

fly from Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Sincerely, 

Wanda Mattiace,Owner Adventure Travel Inc. 

William Mattiace, Former Mayor City of Las Cruces
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee, v. Donald B. TALLEY, Defendant—Appellant.

No. 00-10375.

D.C. No. CR 99-40235-SBA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Subitted May 15, 2001.*

Decided May 18, 2001.

*513Before SNEED, SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges, and SEDWICK,** District Judge.

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

 The Honorable John W. Sedwick, United States District Judge for Alaska, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Donald Talley appeals his conviction following his conditional guilty plea to two counts of unarmed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2144(a). Talley argues that he was arrested without probable cause and that evidence found as a result of the arrest should have been suppressed. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review the district court’s denial of a motion to suppress and application of the law de novo. *United States v. Mattarolo,*209 F.3d 1153, 1155-56 (9th Cir.2000). We accept the district court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous. *Id.*

“Probable cause exists when police officers have reasonably trustworthy information sufficient to warrant a prudent person in believing that the accused had committed or was committing an offense.” *United States v. Harvey,*3 F.3d 1294, 1296 (9th Cir.1993) (quotation marks and citation omitted). We review “the totality of the circumstances known to the officers prior to any search conducted incident to the arrest.” *Id.*“Neither certainty, nor proof beyond a reasonable doubt, is required for probable cause to arrest.” *Id.*

Oakland Police Sergeant Williams stopped Talley upon noticing that his unique hairstyle, distinctive jacket, and physical features matched those of a bank robbery suspect as depicted in a witness drawing, witness statements, and viewed in bank surveillance tapes. At the motion to suppress hearing, the district court noted that the witness drawing clearly showed the robber’s unique hairstyle, and that the *514videos clearly showed the robber’s distinctive jacket, hairstyle, and general appearance. The district court did not clearly err in finding that given Williams’ personal knowledge of the robber’s specific and general characteristics, a reasonably prudent person could have believed that Talley was the bank robbery suspect, and therefore Williams had probable cause to arrest Talley.

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.