alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERWIN HARRIS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0009 DFL KJM P

vs.

CAL A. TERHUNE, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s January 3, 2006 request for the

appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00009-DFL -KJM Document 23 Filed 04/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 3, 2006 request

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: April 20, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

harr0009.31

Case 2:04-cv-00009-DFL -KJM Document 23 Filed 04/21/06 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001052635
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                 1,031,060
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,031,061
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,031,061
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    876,300
<COMMON>                                       154,761
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,031,061
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,436
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 37,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             37,436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    37,436
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

Dennis Martel,

Plaintiff, Civ. No. S 04-0014 DFL PAN P

vs. Order on Request for Counsel

California Department

of Corrections, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoPlaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

pauperis in a civil rights action. Plaintiff moved for

appointment of counsel on August 25, 2005. 

In proceedings that do not threaten a litigant with loss of

physical liberty, there presumptively is no right to appointed

counsel. Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18,

26-27 (1981). Section 1915(e)(1) of Title 28 confers discretion

upon the court to request counsel represent an indigent civil

litigant. Mallard v. District Court, 490 U.S. 296 (1989).

Case 2:04-cv-00014-ALA Document 18 Filed 09/09/05 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In deciding whether to appoint counsel the court exercises

discretion governed by a number of factors, including the

likelihood of success on the merits and the applicant’s ability

to present his claims in light of their complexity. Weygandt v.

Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983); see also, LaMere v.

Risley, 827 F.2d 622, 626 (9th Cir. 1987). Ordinarily the

presumption of regularity in the state’s procedures for confining

prisoners suggests a lack of likely success and counsels against

appointment of counsel. See Maclin v. Freake, 650 F.2d 885, 887

(7th Cir. 1981). As a general rule, the court will not appoint

counsel unless the applicant shows his claim has merit in fact

and law. Id. Even if the applicant overcomes this hurdle, the

court will not appoint counsel if the law is settled and the

material facts are within the plaintiff’s possession, viz., they

do not require investigation outside the prison walls. Id. at

887-88. 

Here, plaintiff alleges his constitutional rights were

violated when defendants delayed and then interfered with

treatment for a serious medical need. The law governing this

issue is settled and investigation outside the prison walls is

unnecessary to discover material facts. There is, on the record

before the court, no reason to believe appointment of counsel

would be of significant benefit. 

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-00014-ALA Document 18 Filed 09/09/05 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

3

Plaintiff’s August 25, 2005, request for the appointment of

counsel therefore is denied.

So ordered.

Dated: September 8, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00014-ALA Document 18 Filed 09/09/05 Page 3 of 3
No. 53501.

protest 602915-G (New York).

#### Blum’s, Incorporated *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20872]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6775]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Enabling a Secure Environment for Vehicle-to-Infrastructure 
Research Workshop; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: ITS Joint Program Office, Research and Innovative Technology 
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) Intelligent 
Transportation System Joint Program Office (ITS JPO) will hold a free 
public meeting on the Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) research program 
on April 18, 2012, 8:30 a.m.-3:30 p.m. at ITS America, 1100 17th Street 
NW., Suite 1200, Washington DC 20036, 202-484-4847. The meeting will 
also be available by webinar. Persons planning to attend the workshop 
or participate in the webinar should register online no later than 
April 15, 2012 at http://www.itsa.org/v2i.
    This public meeting is being held in support of the V2I for Safety 
Program for Connected Vehicles Initiative lead by the ITS JPO. The 
meeting will allow primary stakeholders and subject matter experts to 
review concepts of how selected safety applications will work that 
involve infrastructure components. The outcome of this meeting will 
provide customer based feedback on how these safety applications can be 
developed to achieve maximum effectiveness while minimizing cost.
    The purpose of the V2I program is to enable the development of 
vehicle based applications and safety systems that will assist drivers 
in avoiding crashes. As part of this program, FHWA's role is to develop 
roadside equipment and other enabling technologies that will enable 
these safety applications to function properly.
    If you have any questions or you need any special accommodations, 
please send an email to Adam Hopps at Ahopps@itsa.org.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 15th day of March 2012.
Shelley Row,
Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2012-6775 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 10(pp)

                               SECOND AMENDMENT TO
                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

         The Employment Agreement by and between FLEET FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
(now FleetBoston Financial Corporation), a Rhode Island Corporation (the
"Company"), and Paul F. Hogan (the "Executive"), dated as of March 14, 1999 as
amended effective as of March 17, 2000 (the "Agreement"), is hereby further
amended, effective as of April 22, 2002, as set forth below.

         The following is hereby added at the end of Section 10(a) of the
Agreement:

         Notwithstanding the above, the Executive may designate a beneficiary
         who will be entitled to any portion of the payments under Section 5
         (a)(i) to which the Executive is entitled in the event of his death.
         The beneficiary may be designated or changed by the Executive (without
         the consent of any prior beneficiary) on a form provided by the Company
         and delivered to the Company before his death. If no such beneficiary
         shall have been designated, or if no designated beneficiary shall
         survive the Executive, such payments , if not previously paid, shall be
         paid to the Executive's estate.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Executive and the Company have caused this
Amendment to the Agreement to be entered into, as of the day and year as set
forth above.

                                           /s/ PAUL F. HOGAN
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Executive Signature

                                           FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORP.

                                           /s/ M. ANNE SZOSTAK
                                           ----------------------------
                                           By: M. Anne Szostak

                                           Title: Executive Vice President
EXHIBIT 10.3.2


     THIS IS AN AMENDMENT AGREEMENT (the "Amendment Agreement"), dated as of
February 8, 2005 among West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc., a Pennsylvania
corporation, ("WPS") its wholly owned subsidiary West Pharmaceutical Services
Drug Delivery & Clinical Research Centre Ltd., a corporation organized under the
laws of England and Wales, (together with WPS, the "West Group") and Innovative
Drug Delivery Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("IDDS").

                                   BACKGROUND

     The West Group and IDDS are parties to a License Agreement, dated as of
August 25, 2000, as amended (the "Umbrella License Agreement").

     In connection with the assignment of the Umbrella License Agreement in
connection with the sale of the West Group's drug delivery business, the parties
have agreed to further amend the Umbrella License Agreement.

     In consideration of IDDS's consent to the assignment, and intending to be
legally bound hereby, the parties agree as follows:

1.   Section 6.2.2 of the Umbrella License Agreement is hereby amended to read
     in its entirety as follows:

     "a summary balance sheet for the previous year; provided, however, that
     this Section 6.2.2 shall be deemed to be satisfied so long as the
     information to be furnished is readily available to West or any successor
     or assign (including Archimedes Pharma Limited) on the U.S. Securities and
     Exchange Commission's internet homepage or at the internet homepage of IDDS
     or its parent within the applicable time period required under this Section
     6.2."

2.   Except as expressly set forth above, the Umbrella License Agreement shall
     continue in full force and effect without further amendment.

3.   This Amendment Agreement sets forth the entire agreement between the
     parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all
     written or oral prior agreements or understanding with respect thereto.
     This Amendment Agreement may be executed in counterparts and shall be
     governed by the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania without regard to
     the conflicts of laws principles thereof.

                         [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]


<PAGE>


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this instrument to be
executed in duplicate by their respective duly authorized officers.

INNOVATIVE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS, INC.


By: _________________________________________
         Name:
         Title:

WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES, INC.


By: _________________________________________
         Name: John R. Gailey III
         Title: Vice President

WEST PHARMACEUTICAL SERVICES DRUG DELIVERY & CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTRE LTD.


By: _________________________________________
         Name: Donald E. Morel, Jr.
         Title: Director


                                       2
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No s . 19

- 1300 19

- 1298 19

- 1296
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Appellee ,

v. DAVID JOEL V É LEZ
- ANDINO , Defendant, Appellant
.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this court issued on August 30, 2021, is
corrected as follows:

On page 14, line 16, remove "There" and add the following: "A finding of unreasonableness would, of course, comprise such an extraordinary circumstance, see United States v. Battle , 637 F.3d 44, 51

- 52 (1st Cir. 2011), but the refusal to depart in this case was far from unreasonable. Simply put, there
. . . "
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Ardent Mines Limited(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Taras Chebountchak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 21st day of March, 2007.



| | TARAS CHEBOUNTCHAK                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Taras Chebountchak                                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES H. CARR,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0584 MCE JFM P

vs.

TOM CAREY, Warden, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an application for a

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges a May 28, 2002

decision of a panel of the California Board of Prison Terms (Board) to deny him a parole date. 

This matter is before the court on respondent’s motion to dismiss.

Respondent contends, inter alia, that petitioner has no federally protected liberty

interest in parole under California law. To support that contention, respondent relies on an order

of the district court in Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms, 376 F.Supp.2d 975 (E.D.Cal.

2005). The Sass case is set for oral argument in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

Circuit on March 16, 2006. Good cause appearing, respondent’s motion will be denied without

prejudice to its renewal, as appropriate, not later than thirty days after any decision by the court

of appeals in Sass. 

Case 2:04-cv-00584-MCE -JFM Document 45 Filed 02/15/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent’s

August 15, 2005 motion to dismiss is denied without prejudice.

DATED: February 15, 2006. 

12

mous2037.mtd

Case 2:04-cv-00584-MCE -JFM Document 45 Filed 02/15/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 52561.

protests 41212-K, etc. (St. Albans).

#### Central Vermont Railway, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RICHARD B. FEINBERG : CIVIL ACTION

:

:

v. :

I. ISABELLE BENTON, et al. : NO. 05-cv-4847

JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this day of June, 2008, judgment is hereby entered in favor of 

I. Isabelle Benton and Benton Partners II LLP and against Richard B. Feinberg in the amount of

$2,168.19.

 S/ MICHAEL E. KUNZ 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ

CLERK OF COURT

Case 2:05-cv-04847-RB Document 108 Filed 07/02/08 Page 1 of 1
## Breadcrumb

-  National Minerals Information Center 

#           The Mineral Industry of Pennsylvania      

      By National Minerals Information Center

-  Home 
-  Commodities 
-  Countries 
-  Materials Flow 
-  US States 
-  NMIC Seminars 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

Statistics and information on the nonfuel mineral commodities produced in Pennsylvania

### Minerals Yearbook Vol. II - Domestic

2018-2019 data for Pennsylvania are summarized in the table on this web page. The 2015 chapter data tables (XLS) and 2014 chapter containing text and data tables in PDF and XLS formats are available, with other years, through the links below.

### Sources of information

Pennsylvania is a major producer of crushed stone and produces construction and industrial sand and gravel, lime, portland cement, and peat. Metal and ferroalloy production was from materials acquired from other domestic and foreign sources.

                        - Statistical Summary
                        - Aggregates Data by State, Type, and End Use
                        - Mineral Commodity Summaries
                        -  Mineral Industry Surveys
                        - Minerals Yearbook Volume I -- Metals and Minerals
                        - Mineral Yearbook Volume II - Pennsylvania chapters

The following data table gives nonfuel mineral commodity production data for Pennsylvania extracted from Table 5 in the 2019 Minerals Yearbook Statistical Summary.

eEstimated. rRevised. NA Not available. XX Not applicable.

1Includes data from the commodity chapters published in the Minerals Yearbook as they were completed and released through January 2023.

2Production as measured by mine shipments, sales, or marketable production (including consumption by producers).

3Data are rounded to no more than three significant digits; may not add to totals shown.

4Withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data.

7Withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data; value included in "Undistributed" in the U.S. total value.

### **Minerals Yearbook Volume II Pennsylvania chapters:**

*Subscribe to receive an email notification when a publication is added to this p**age*.
                            - Minerals Yearbook:  The Mineral Industry of Pennsylvania   	  PDF Format:   	|  1994  |  1995  |  1996  |  1997  |  1998  |  1999  |  2000  |  2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010-2011  |  2012-2013  |  2014   |    	  XLS Format:   	     |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010-2011  |  2012-2013  |  2014   |  2015 tables-only release  | 
                            - Archive   	     |  1932-1993  |

### Links

                            - Pennsylvania Geological Survey
                            - Association of American State Geologists

### Contacts

#### Robert M Callaghan

##### Mineral Commodity Specialist - States

National Minerals Information Center

rcallaghan@usgs.gov

703-648-7709
(Part 1SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection IV) (U.S. Standard General Ledger - Account Attribute Definition Report)

 (Bulletin No. 2022-04) (IV ADR - 1) (December 2021)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,786] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation was initiated on January 18, 2007 in response to a worker petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Hanes Menswear, a/k/a Hanes Brands, Inc., Ponce, Puerto Rico. 

The petitioning group of workers is covered by an active certification, (TA-W-60,915), which expires on February 13, 2009. Consequently, further investigation in this case would serve no purpose, and the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed at Washington, DC this 13th day of February, 2007. 

Richard Church, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

 [FR Doc. E7-3276 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 55219.

#### H. Elkan & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 160283-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2006/C 283/02)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----