alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           7,893
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,069
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   554
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          59,845
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            58,992
<LOANS>                                        222,208
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,323
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,686
<DEPOSITS>                                     239,267
<SHORT-TERM>                                    16,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,167
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 304,686
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,118
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  570
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   107
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,172
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,442
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,679
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,493
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       51
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    469
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         469
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       288
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.24
<LOANS-NON>                                        513
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,273
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       38
<RECOVERIES>                                        37
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,323
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,323
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Gregory
J. Halpern, Chief Executive Officer of the Z Trim Holdings, Inc. certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Z
Trim Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  November 14, 2006
                                    By  /s/ Gregory J. Halpern
                                        ----------------------
                                        Gregory J. Halpern
                                        Chairman of the Board, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        (Principal Executive Officer)
## U NITED 

## S TATES 

## A IR 

## F ORCE 

## C OURT OF 

## C RIMINAL 

## A PPEALS

_______ _______ __________ No. ACM S32415

_______ _______ __________ UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Breanna T. WILSON Airman First Class (E

- 3 ) , U.S. Air Force, Appellant

_______ _______ __________ Appeal from the United S tates Air Force Trial Judiciary Decided 6 July 2017

_______ _______ __________ Military Judge: Andrew Kalavanos

. Approved sentence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 5 months , and reduction to E

- 1

. Sentence adjudged 11 April 2016 by SpCM convened at Joint Base Langley

- Eustis , Virginia

. For Appellant: Major Jarett Merk , USAF. For Appellee: M ajor Mary Ellen Payne , USAF

. Before MAYBERRY, HARDING, and C. BROWN , Appellate Military Judges

.

_______ _______ __________ This is an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

_______ _______ __________
PE R CURIAM : The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error materially prejudicial to Appellant ’ s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), U niform C ode of M ilitary J ustice , 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c).United States v. Wilson , No. ACM S32415

2 Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT

KURT J. BRUBAKER Clerk of the Court
No. 55898.

protest 64426-K (New York).

#### Burroughs Wellcome & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DeWAYNE G. THOMAS, No. CIV S-04-0695-LKK-CMK-P

Plaintiff, 

vs. ORDER

JOSEPH A. BICK,

Defendant.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant

to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

Eastern District of California local rules.

On April 7, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. Plaintiff has not filed objections

to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. 

/ / /

Case 2:04-cv-00695-LKK -CMK Document 35 Filed 06/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 7, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is granted; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file.

DATED: June 1, 2006.

 

Lawrence K. Karlton, Senior Judge

U.S. District Court

Case 2:04-cv-00695-LKK -CMK Document 35 Filed 06/02/06 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

April 17, 1961

No. 65456.

#### Sears, Roebuck and Co. *v.*United States,

protests 295575-K, etc. (Portland, Oreg.).

*426Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 50938.

C. D. 976.

#### Protest 44217-K of Standard Railway Equipment Mfg. Co.

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
#### Rubin THOMPSON, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RICHLAND COUNTY DETENTION CENTER; Richland County Detention Center Administration; Richland County Medical Division, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-6117.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 18, 2001.

Rubin Thompson, Jr., pro se. William Henry Davidson, II, Matthew Blaine Ros-brugh, Davidson, Morrison *&*Lindemann, P.A., Columbia, SC, for appellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rubin Thompson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See Thompson v. Richland County Det. Ctr.,*No. CA-00-276-9 (D.S.C. Dec. 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
FR Modernization

Jaime M. SalingMay 10, 2018

1

FY 2018 Reporting

No changes to closing package process

FY 2019 Reporting

GTAS and GFRS Update

DoD

Compilation

IGT

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

2

Current State

Governmentwide Financial Reporting System (GFRS)

Modules 6-8 Manual Entry

Governmentwide Treasury Account Symbol Adjusted Trial Balance System (GTAS)

Disclaimer

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Explain that the focus is just the preparation of the FR

Focus on all entities do GTAS reporting but for the FR significant entities still have to do all modules in GFRS.

Point out the use of significant entities GTAS data throughout the fiscal year and at year end for analysis and closing audit recommendations.

3

System Environment for FR Compilation - FY 2018

Phase 1 Objectives:

Gap analysis between GFRS/Cognos

Compare production FR to FR produced from the parallel process

Identify back office changes needed to support the new process (agency certifications and closing package procedures)

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

4

System Environment for FR Compilation - FY 2019

Phase 2 Objectives:

Position Treasury to decommission GFRS

Single point of entry for agency users

Modernize certifications for Closing Package approvers

Continue to support traceability between agency audited financial statements and governmentwide statements

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

5

Final Notes (only cover if needed): 

The 1S setup is better for external agency access, making it a good fit for SS.

1S does not have a component that is equivalent to CDM, making it a bad fit for FR publication.  CDM is a client installed application, making it a bad fit for SS.

The crosswalking aspect of creating agency financial statements can be done in either system.

Conceptually, it makes sense to do the data analysis work to crosswalk agency financial statements from GTAS as a conduit to the FR in Cognos as a proof of concept.  If decisions are made that send us down the path of needing external agency access in Cognos, it would make sense to take another look at 1S.  At that point, we will have plenty of 1S experience from the SS project.  Additionally, it would not be a huge stretch to re-create the data hierarchies in 1S from the Cognos proof of concept work.

FY 2018

No Changes to the Closing Package Process

What Does this Mean to You?

FY 2019

No more GFRS!

GTAS populated financial statement lines plus a significant portion of the footnotes

Provide “non-crosswalkable” footnotes, other data, RSI, RSSI to Treasury in a new way

Changes to the Closing Package audit (Full Financial Audit, AUPs, or Examination)

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Jaime M. Saling

	Department of the Treasury	Bureau of the Fiscal Service

	(304) 480-5129

	Jaime.Saling@fiscal.treasury.gov

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Contact Information

‹#›

7

# image2.png

# image1.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image6.png

# image5.png

# image7.png

# image8.jpeg

# image9.png
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Download an LVD

To download an Local Verification Database (LVD), complete the following steps:

1. From the Check Processing tab, select Manage Verification>Download LVD. The 

Download LVD page appears.

• Prior to downloading an LVD, you must log in using the OTCnet Offline icon on your

terminal desktop or access your Start Menu under Programs and enter your 

credentials. 

• Internet connection is required to download LVD records from the Master Verification 

Database (MVD).

2. Click Submit. The Download LVD dialog box appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Download LVD

Wait until the display percent completion reaches 100% before clicking Close.

3. Click Close. A Confirmation page appears stating that the verification records are updated.

Click Return Home to the OTCnet Home Page.

Application Tips

Application Tip

Additional Button
Case .No. 9,746.

#### MOODY v. FULLER.

[5 Cranch, C. C. 303.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1837.

Slavery — Removal into District of Columbia— Sale within Three Years — Suit for Freedom.

An officer of the United States, being the bona fide owner of a slave in Fortress Munroe. a place within the United States, but not within the jurisdiction of any one of the states, and removing thence with his family to the city of Washington in the District of Columbia, to reside therein, and, bringing his slave with him, cannot lawfully sell such slave within throe years after such removal and importation; and such slave, by such importation and sale, becomes free. •. —

Petition for freedom.

Mr. Bradley, for defendant

[Azariah Fuller] prayed the court to instruct the jury that if, from the evidence, they shall be of opinion that Andrew B. McLean was the bona fide owner of the petitioner [the ue-gress Sally Moody] and, while such bona fide owner, resided as an officer of, and in the employment of the United States, for a series of years, at Fortress Munroe, within the territory of the United States, and not within the limits of any state of this Union, and brought her from the said territory into the District of Columbia, with his family, when he removed here to reside; then, although the jury shall further find that the petitioner was sold within three years after such removal into the said district, she is not entitled to her freedom under such removal and sale, unless they shall further find that such residence at said Fortress Munroe was intended to defeat or avoid the law prohibiting the importation of slaves.

Mr. Dermott, for petitioner.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

But

THE COURT

(nem. con.) refused to give the instruction.
# sec5_balsh_2024

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI BS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10December 2022
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"ARIAL,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection VII  &"ARIAL,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 7/7/21
No. 61802.

#### Clarence S. Holmes et al. *v.*United States,

protests 220320-K, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

          <ARTICLE>     5
          <MULTIPLIER>     1,000
                 
          <S>                                <C>
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996 
          <PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1996 
          <PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1996 
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
          <CASH>                                                    19,365
          <SECURITIES>                                                   0
          <RECEIVABLES>                                            302,541
          <ALLOWANCES>                                              19,124
          <INVENTORY>                                              281,107
          <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         607,267
          <PP&E>                                                   425,729
          <DEPRECIATION>                                           123,767
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,269,204
          <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    144,606
          <BONDS>                                                  572,600
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
          <PREFERRED>                                                    0
          <COMMON>                                                  61,432
          <OTHER-SE>                                               278,554
          <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,269,204
          <SALES>                                                1,696,795
          <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,696,795
          <CGS>                                                  1,228,355
          <TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,228,355
          <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
          <LOSS-PROVISION>                                           6,179
          <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        45,217
          <INCOME-PRETAX>                                           88,292
          <INCOME-TAX>                                              34,070
          <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       54,222
          <DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
          <EXTRAORDINARY>                                           (7,417)
          <CHANGES>                                                      0
          <NET-INCOME>                                              46,805
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.79
          <EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.76
                  
          
</TABLE>
p.1 

OAR Box 1834 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

40) IV-E-13 

Docket Number: 

A-90-07 

Printed 11/10/2008 2:14:35 PM Sheet 40 of 61 
P.2 

£> 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY T\Tj- £" - 1 3 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

MEMORANDUM 

OFFICE OF 

AIR ANO RADIATION 

2 7 1994 |ID! 

J 1 MAY 2 6 1994 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

Meeting on April 21, 1994 with the Chemical Manufacturers 

Association (CMA) regarding the Fuels and Fuel Additives 

(F/FA) Registration (Health Effects Testing) Program 

Judith Gray, Senior Project Manager U ^ 

i Special Regulatory Projects Branc 

TO: Docket A-90-07 

Attending the meeting were the following: 

From CMA: Charles Keller, Max Mason, Neil King 

From EPA/OMS: Richard Wilson, Chester France, Carl 

Fulper, David Kortum, Ines Figueroa, Robert Johnson, 

Judith Gray 

From EPA/OGC: Lorie Schmidt, Mary Ellen Levine 

CMA representatives met with EPA officials at CMA's request to 

discuss the F/FA testing rule. CMA representatives asked a number 

of very specific questions about the intent of the proposed rule as 

described in the Notice of Reopening of the Comment Period (59 FR 

8886) . The questions particularly addressed the details of what 

F/FA products EPA intended to cover as "registrable" and how fuel 

additives would be tested, under the proposed rule. CMA 

representatives further reiterated a number of points in their 

previous written comments, including their arguments against an 

Alternative Tier 2 provision, EPA's proposed definition of baseline 

diesel and, in particular, the impossibility of completing Tier 3 

testing within the three year period prescribed in the proposals.
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors of Husky Energy Inc.

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-187135) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-208443) of Husky Energy Inc. of:



| |  | our independent auditors report dated February 25, 2016, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Husky Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the consolidated
statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information;
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | our independent auditors report of registered public accounting firm dated February 25, 2016, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Husky Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2015 and
December 31, 2014, the consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and
other explanatory information; and
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | our report of independent registered public accounting firm dated February 25, 2016 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2015,
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

which reports appear in the December 31, 2015 annual report on Form 40-F of Husky Energy Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, and
further consent to the use of such reports in such annual report on Form 40-F.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP                      
|KPMG LLP                          
|Chartered Professional Accountants
|                                  
|Calgary, Canada                   
|February 26, 2016