alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of OdysseyHealthCare, Inc.:(1) Form S-8 (No. 333-72888) pertaining to the Odyssey HealthCare, Inc. Stock Option Plan, theOdyssey HealthCare, Inc. 2001 Equity-Based Compensation Plan and the Odyssey HealthCare, Inc.Employee Stock Purchase Plan and(2) Form S-8 (No. 333-129990) pertaining to the Odyssey HealthCare, Inc. 2001 Equity-BasedCompensation Plan,of our reports dated March 7, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements ofOdyssey HealthCare, Inc., Odyssey HealthCare, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Odyssey HealthCare, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2006, and to the reference to our firm in the Selected Financial Data tableincluded in the Form 10-K, Item 6. /s/  Ernst &    Young LLP     Dallas, Texas    March 7, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARREL L. SMITH, No. 2:04-cv-0702-MCE-PAN-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

C. KING,

Defendant.

 /

DARREL L. SMITH, No. 2:04-cv-0703-MCE-KJM-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

SGT. J. SWANEY and LT. GOLD,

Defendants.

 /

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cv-00703-MCE -KJM Document 19 Filed 02/27/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The Court has received the Notice of Related Cases

concerning the above-captioned cases filed August 11, 2005. See

Local Rule 83-123, E.D. Cal. (1997). The Court has, however,

determined that it is inappropriate to relate and reassign Civil

No. 2:04-cv-0702-MCE-PAN-P to Civil No. 2:04-cv-0703-MCE-KJM-P,

and it therefore declines to do so.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 24, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00703-MCE -KJM Document 19 Filed 02/27/06 Page 2 of 2
# sec5_balsh_2024

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10V BS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10June 2023
Before the Second Division,

October 29, 1947

No. 51980.

#### F. Schumacher & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 54249-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Acknowledgement Letter from Zhengdong Zhu and Baohong Yin to the Registrant



 Exhibit 10.16 
 CONFIRMATION 
 TO: China Distance Education Holdings Limited 
 We, Zhu Zhengdong and Yin Baohong, hereby confirm that we should donate the foreign exchange of the value equals to
RMB 3,200,000.00 for free to China Distance Education Holdings Limited as of May 1st, 2004 
  

			
	Signature:	 	Zhu Zhengdong
		
		 	Yin Baohong
		
	Date: 	 	March 25th, 2008

  

 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                             204
<SECURITIES>                                       144
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1677
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (31)
<INVENTORY>                                        463
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                            1612
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (842)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                           2304
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           786
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2315)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3752
<SALES>                                           5508
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  5731
<CGS>                                             4828
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5735
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   220
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    21
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 168
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (4)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (37)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (41)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (41)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>The company has adopted an unclassified presentation in the Statement of
Financial Condition.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Jerry D. Chase, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of thedate hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.   Date: August 9, 2005 By /s/ Jerry D. Chase  Jerry D. Chase  Chief Executive Officer
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3999 

To require mandatory review of performance improvement plans during tenure 

and promotion appraisal process. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 20, 2024 

Mr. RUBIO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require mandatory review of performance improvement 

plans during tenure and promotion appraisal process. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MANDATORY REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE IM4 PROVEMENT PLANS DURING TENURE AND 

5 PROMOTION APPRAISAL PROCESS. 

6 The Secretary of State shall ensure that the tenure 

7 and promotion appraisal process for any Foreign Service 

8 officer include a review of all Performance Improvement 

9 Plans that have been issued to such officer during the preVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:49 Apr 03, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3999.IS S3999

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3999 IS

1 ceding 5-year period regarding performance that was con2 sidered unacceptable. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4058 

To require that the regulations related to SAVE Plan shall have the force 

and effect of enacted law. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 22, 2024 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. CASEY, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, Mr. 

WYDEN, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. WELCH, Ms. HIRONO, 

Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. BUTLER, Ms. SMITH, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and Mr. 

PADILLA) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require that the regulations related to SAVE Plan shall 

have the force and effect of enacted law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Codifying SAVE Plan 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CODIFYING THE SAVE PLAN. 

7 The provisions of parts 682 and 685 of title 34, Code 

8 of Federal Regulations, (relating to the SAVE Plan), as 

9 amended by the final regulations published by the DepartVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:28 Apr 09, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S4058.IS S4058

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 4058 IS

1 ment of Education in the Federal Register on July 10, 

2 2023 (88 Fed. Reg. 43820), shall have the force and effect 

3 of enacted law. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Asim Ghosh, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 6, 2014

|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|                                              
|/s/ Asim Ghosh                                
|Asim Ghosh President & Chief
Executive Officer
No. 47321.

#### Protests 864310-G, etc., of Allied Stores Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400' the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendants’ First Request for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

SHAWN HAWK,

Plaintiff,

v.

ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants.

CASE NO. 2:04-cv-0731 MCE CMK P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION

OF TIME TO RESPOND TO

PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT

Good cause appearing, Defendants are granted a 30-day extension of time to respond

to Plaintiff’s Complaint. Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s complaint shall be due on or before

October 18, 2006.

September 25, 2006

/s/ CRAIG M. KELLISON 

Craig M. Kellison

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

04cv0731 -- 2nd order granting extension of time.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-00731-MCE -CMK Document 32 Filed 09/26/06 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit  32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of SoftNet Technology Corp. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James Booth, Chief Executive Officer certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.			   			Date: March 25, 2007                                    /s/ "James Booth"                                                                                      James Booth			                                                                     Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.7






Exhibit 10.7




NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT



The undersigned, (hereinafter called “investor”) in consideration for the use of certain
information, data and/or know-how related to the so-called “Entec Engine” the rights to which are
owned TecTransfer, Inc. a Nevada Corporation, hereby agrees as follows:



1. Investor shall keep in confidence and not use the Information for its commercial benefit (except
for technical and economic evaluation internal to investor). investor shall further keep in
confidence and not disclose any part of the Information to a third party or parties or use the
business plan without the written consent of TTI.



2. Any obligation of investor as set forth in the preceding paragraph shall apply to information
disclosed in writing and designated confidential, or if disclosed orally, shall be promptly reduced
to writing. However, this obligation shall not apply to any information, knowledge, data and/or
know-how which:





(a) Is or hereinafter becomes a part of the public knowledge through no fault of investor; or




(b) investor can demonstrate was in its possession prior to the time of disclosure by TTI; or




(c) investor can demonstrate was received by it from a third party who has not received the same
from TTI; or




(d) Is independently developed by or for investor by persons not having access to Information
hereunder as shown by written records.


3. Investor shall obligate its employees and the employees of its affiliates who shall have access
to any portion of the Information to protect the confidential and proprietary nature of the
Information.




Investor



 




Signature



 




Name



 




Title




 






Date



Address where information should be sent:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 :

ROGER LEE RECTOR, : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

 :

v. :

: NO. 05-CV-3660

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY : 

Defendant. :

 

ORDER

AND NOW, this _____ day of August, 2006, upon consideration of the parties’ crossMotions for Summary Judgment (Docs. 8 & 9), and after careful review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter (Doc. 12), and Plaintiff’s

Objections (Doc. 13), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation dated April 27, 2006, is APPROVED and

ADOPTED;

2. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and

3. The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall mark the above-captioned

case as CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Petrese B. Tucker

____________________________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. 

Case 2:05-cv-03660-PBT Document 14 Filed 08/15/06 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

August 23, 1949

No. 53515.

protests 971938-G, etc. (Los Angeles and San Francisco).

#### Wing Chong Lung Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 00-2779

___________

Vishnue L. Jennings, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the District

* of Nebraska.

Kellogg USA, Inc.; American *

Federation of Grain Millers, Local * [UNPUBLISHED]

#50, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: June 7, 2001

Filed: June 12, 2001

___________

Before MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and FAGG,

Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Vishnue L. Jennings appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary

judgment in Jennings's employment discrimination action. After de novo review of the

record and a thorough review of the parties' submissions, see LaCroix v. Sears,

Roebuck, & Co., 240 F.3d 688, 690 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review), we conclude

summary judgment for defendants was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated in the district court's opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
-2-

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Before the Second Division,

December 18, 1959

No. 63614.

protest 58/16285 (New York).

#### Boys’ Towns of Italy, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
136235 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices

v SC: 136235 COA: 271764 Macomb CC: 2 005-000694-AR 39 th District Court: 04-242199 EDWARD STROSS, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 21, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERS E the judgment of the Court of Appeals. Defendant received a variance to paint an oversized sign fro m the local Zoning Board of Appeals, under specified conditions, on July 15, 1997. In 2005 , a jury convicted defendant under a local ordina nce for violating these conditio ns. The Court of Appeals concluded that the condition prohibiting “lettering” was “a n unconstitutional regulation of speech, infringing on defend ant’s First Amendment protec tions,” and reversed the conviction.

The Court of Appeals erroneously reached this conclusion, in our judgment. At the time defendant’s variance was granted, then-current MCL 125.585(11) required a party to challenge the constitutionality of th e variance within 21 days. Defendant’s painting the word “LOVE” on the sign clearly violated the “lettering” condition of the variance. Because this statute prescribed the relevant procedur e for challenging the constitutionality of the conditions , defendant was oblig ated to challenge these conditions in accordance with this procedure. His failu re to do so precludes him from raising his constitutional challenge eight years later. See Finlayson v West Bloomfield Township

, 320 Mich 350, 357-358 (1948) (requiring a claim to be f iled within the time period specified by statute); City of Troy v Aslanian , 170 Mich App 523, 530 (1988) (“A party who has accepted and retained the advantages of a varian ce granted on condition is estopped to attack the propriety of the conditi on.”). Because the Cour t of Appeals did not_______________________________________ __ 2

address the remainder of defendant’s issues on appeal, we REMAND to the Court of Appeals to consider defenda nt’s remaining arguments.

C AVANAGH AND K ELLY
, JJ., would deny leave to appeal.

p0903 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2008

Clerk
No. 58501.

protests 229853-K, etc. (New York).

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Security Reports: User Information

To view a user information report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, select Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Security Reports, select User Information. The User Information parameters page 

appears.

3. Enter the User ID or E-mail Address of the user you must view.

Or

Enter both the First Name and Last Name of the user.

4. Select Submit to initiate the report. The User Information preview page appears as shown in 

Figure 1.

5. Under Export as, you have the following options:

• Select PDF, Excel or Word format

• Select Download

Or

• Select Print PDF Report

Figure 1: User Information Preview Page
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

For new users who have not logged into OTCnet yet, the User Name, User ID, and

Phone Number values will be empty in the database and displayed as blank values on 

the preview page. 

Application Tip
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 10(iii)

                            PROMISSORY NOTE -- 01-11
                            ------------------------

$1,000,000
July 20, 2001

     FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Excalibur I, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, duly
organized under the laws of the State of New York and having its usual business
address at 3000 Marcus Avenue, Suite IW5, Lake Success, New York, 10042
(hereinafter called "Borrower"), hereby promises to pay to the order of
ENVIRO-CLEAN OF AMERICA, INC., (hereinafter called "Payee") the sum of
$1,000,000 ("advanced sum") plus the amounts more fully stated in a certain
Private Placement Memorandum dated July 20, 2001, the terms of which are
incorporated herein by reference, which shall not exceed but may be less than
the amount of $500,000. Payments shall be paid in quarterly installments until
the Payee receives 150 percent of the advanced sum,/1/ or the time collections
derived from the defaulted-upon accounts receivable have been exhausted,
whichever event occurs first.

     Payments shall fluctuate each quarter based upon the Borrower's net
revenues.

     This note may be prepaid in full or in part, in advance of maturity,
without a penalty.

     The Borrower hereby waives presentment, protest, or further demand or
notice of any kind otherwise required in connection with the payment of
principal or interest on this note.

     All rights and obligations hereunder shall be governed by the laws of the
State of New York, and this Note shall be deemed to be under seal.

     All the covenants, agreements, and terms contained in this Note shall bind
Borrower and Borrower's successors and assigns.

     This Promissory Note may not be assigned by the Payee.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has executed this Note the day and year
first above written.

                                   EXCALIBUR I, LLC

                                   By: Anlyn Associates, Inc., Member


                                   By:     /s/ Melvin Schreiber
                                      ------------------------------
                                      Melvin Schreiber, President


--------------------
/1/ For tax purposes, any money received by Payee over and above the advanced
    sum shall be treated as interest.
No. 47829.

#### Protest 87847-K of Indo Persian Fine Art Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 46985, the mufflers in question were held dutiable at 60 percent under paragraph 1209 as claimed.