alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ACCORD AND SATISFACTION


This Accord and Satisfaction (the "Agreement") is entered into effective as of
the 30th day of June, 2006 by and between William D. Dunlavy ("Will") and Park
City Group, Inc. ("PCG").

                                    RECITALS

Whereas, Will has an employment agreement (the Employment Agreement") with
Cooper Fields, LLC dated July 1, 1999; and

Whereas, PCG is the successor in interest to Cooper Fields, LLC and its
business, operations and obligations; and

Whereas, Will is presently employed by PCG and both Will and PCG desire to
memorialize the terms of Will's employment in writing; and

Whereas, Will acknowledges that any obligations of Cooper Fields, LLC that may
or may not exist as of the date hereof are the obligations of PCG and any
satisfaction by PCG of such obligations shall work as a satisfaction on behalf
of Cooper Fields LLC.

                                    AGREEMENT

Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained
herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:

1. PCG hereby agrees to memorialize the terms of Will's employment with PCG by
entering into a new employment agreement which sets forth the terms thereof, the
form of which is attached hereto and which shall be executed concurrent
herewith.

2. Will hereby releases and forever discharges and by these presents does, for
himself, his heirs, executors, administrators and successors, remise, release
acquit, satisfy and forever discharge PCG, its subsidiaries, affiliates and
officers and directors, of and from all, and all manner of action and actions,
cause and causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts,
covenants and contracts, promises, claims and demands whatsoever in law or in
equity arising out of the Employment Agreement which he ever had, now has or
which his heirs, executors or administrators, hereafter can, shall or may have,
for upon or by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever from the
beginning of the world to the day of the date of this Agreement.

In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Accord and Satisfaction
to be executed as of the date first above written.




Park City Group, Inc.


-----------------------------                      ----------------------------
William D. Dunlavy
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Business Reports: Adjustments by OTC Endpoint

To view adjustments by OTC Endpoint report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, click Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears.

2. Under Business Reports, click Adjustments by OTC Endpoint. The Adjustments by OTC 

Endpoint parameters page appears.

3. Enter your search criteria.

• Select the Organization, required

• Select the Adjustment Type, required

• Select the ALC (Agency Location Code)

• Enter the From: and To: Adjustment Date range

• Enter the From: and To: Deposit Date range

• Enter the From: and To: Adjustment Amount range

• Click Yes or No for Report With Children

• The date range for Adjustment Date and Deposit Date cannot exceed 15 months.

• Click Yes For Report with Children to generate a report that contains data for the 

selected OTC Endpoint and all lower level OTC Endpoints. 

• Click No For Report with Children to generate a report that contains data only for 

the selected OTC Endpoint.

4. Click an OTC Endpoint to initiate the report. The Adjustments by OTC Endpoint preview 

appears as shown in Figure 1.

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1: Adjustments by OTC Endpoint Parameters Page

• TGA denotes a deposit processing OTC Endpoint.

• CHK denotes a check capture OTC Endpoint.

• M denotes a mapped accounting code; an open lock denotes access permission; 

and a closed lock denotes no access permission.

• CDC denotes card processing OTC Endpoint.

5. Under Export as, you have the following options:

• Select PDF, Excel or Word format

• Click Download

▪ Or

• Click Print PDF Report

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

All adjustments associated with Deposits with an original voucher date older than 5

years and Returned Item Adjustments with an adjustment voucher date older than 5

years have been archived to the archive database, according to the Fiscal Service data 

retention policy. These transactions are viewable through the Historical Reports page 

(Home>Reports>Historical Reports).

Click Previous to return to the previous page.

Application Tip

Additional Button
February 12, 1945

No. 50011.

#### Protest 79473-K of Calif. Asia Co., Ltd.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 136941 & (15)(16)(17) Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. MENTOR TOWNSHIP, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, J ustices

v SC: 136941 COA: 283469 Oscoda CC: 06-004028-CE GENE HOY, Defendant-Appellant,

and

FLASKA PROPERTIES, LLC, Defendant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to ap peal the July 3, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that th e questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay and motion for miscellaneous relief are DENIED.

p0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
# C_2019230EN.01002801.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2019 — Poland v Commission

(Joined Cases T-836/16 and T-624/17) (1)

(State aid - Polish tax on the retail sector - Progressive tax levied on turnover - Decision to open the formal investigation procedure - Final decision classifying the measure as State aid incompatible with the internal market - Concept of State aid - Condition relating to selectivity)

(2019/C 230/34)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, M. Rzotkiewicz and A. Kramarczyk-Szaładzińska, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Hungary (represented by: in Case T-836/16, M. Fehér, G. Koós and E. Tóth, and in Case T-624/17, M. Fehér and G. Koós, acting as Agents)

Re:

Applications based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment, first, of Commission Decision C(2016) 5596 final of 19 September 2016 on the State Aid SA.44351 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) — Poland — Polish tax on the retail sector, opening the formal investigation procedure provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU in respect of that measure and, secondly, Commission Decision (EU) 2018/160 of 30 June 2017 on the State aid SA.44351 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Poland for the tax on the retail sector (OJ 2018 L 29, p.38), closing the procedure and according to which that measure constitutes State aid incompatible with the internal market which has been unlawfully implemented.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 5596 final of 19 September 2016 on the State Aid SA.44351 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) — Poland — Polish tax on the retail sector; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 5596 final of 19 September 2016 on the State Aid SA.44351 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) — Poland — Polish tax on the retail sector;

| 2. | Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2018/160 of 30 June 2017 on the State aid SA.44351 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Poland for the tax on the retail sector; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2018/160 of 30 June 2017 on the State aid SA.44351 (2016/C) (ex 2016/NN) implemented by Poland for the tax on the retail sector;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Poland in Cases T-836/16 and T-624/17; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Republic of Poland in Cases T-836/16 and T-624/17;

| 4. | Orders Hungary to bear its own costs in Cases T-836/6 and T-624/17. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Hungary to bear its own costs in Cases T-836/6 and T-624/17.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.

---
Part 1, Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits 

One of the goals the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) has envisioned for GTAS is to improve 

the consistency in agency trial balance reporting. This will be accomplished through validations and edits.

The validations ensure that the attributes reported in agencies’ GTAS trial balance submissions are valid for

the USSGL account. The validations encompass both USSGL level attributes per the USSGL Attribute

Table and Treasury Account Symbol (TAS) level attributes found in the Super Master Account (SMAF).

Simple validations are those involving one attribute while special validations involve more than one attribute.

All validations are fatal.

The edits compare the agency trial balances with USSGL rules and with data from authoritative sources

such as the Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS), Fiscal Service, and the Federal Financing Bank.

The edits may be either fatal or proposed. Fiscal Service will use the proposed edits only for analytical

purposes. Fiscal Service disclaims any role or responsibility with the agency auditor relationship concerning

the GTAS fatal and proposed analytical edits.

The following are the validation and edit reports included in this section:

Section VII Page Number

GTAS Validation Summary Report (VSR) VII VSR - 1

GTAS Validation Detail Report (VDR) VII VDR - 1

GTAS Edits Summary Report (ESR) VII ESR - 1

GTAS Edits Detail Report (EDR) VII EDR - 1

GTAS Closing Edits Report (CER) VII CER - 1

Page 1 of 1
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Training
- CIR Overview & System-to-System Project

# Collections Information Repository (CIR) Overview & System-to-System Project

Audience:

Open to all federal agencies

----

Location:

Online

----

Duration:

 Thurs, October 24, 2019 | 10:00 am — 11:00 am ET 

 Thurs, October 24, 2019 | 2:00 pm — 3:00 pm ET 

----

Cost:

Free

----

Hosted by:

Revenue Collections Management

----

Point of Contact:

arm@fiscal.treasury.gov

## Event Details:

The purpose of the webinar is to provide federal program agencies with a high level overview of the CIR Application, the data available, file transmission options and top 5 reports tips and tricks. 

Topics will include: 

- CIR Overview
- System-to-System Project
- CIR Top 5 Reports

If you have any questions, please e-mail arm@fiscal.treasury.gov

### Registration Form

Fields marked with an asterisk(*) are required. 

Last modified 08/08/21
No. 64831.

#### Curt L. Sterner Co., Inc., and Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/28103 and 58/24161 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 2095), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 54549.

#### Weil Bros. Textiles, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 137241-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
----

----

I Informacje

Komisja

----

Kursy walutowe euro (1)

18 października 2006

(2006/C 253/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Źródło: referencyjny kurs wymiany walut opublikowany przez ECB.

----

----

Informacje przekazane przez Państwa Członkowskie, dotyczące pomocy państwa przyznanej na mocy rozporządzenia Komisji (WE) nr 70/2001 z dnia 12 stycznia 2001 r. w sprawie zastosowania art. 87 i 88 Traktatu WE w odniesieniu do pomocy państwa dla małych i średnich przedsiębiorstw

(2006/C 253/02)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

----

----

Przyjęcie trzech dokumentów referencyjnych do celów Dyrektywy Rady 96/61/WE dotyczącej zintegrowanego zapobiegania zanieczyszczeniom i ich kontroli (1)

(2006/C 253/03)

Dnia 25 lipca 2006 r. Komisja przyjęła pełne teksty dokumentów referencyjnych na temat:

Wymienione dokumenty są dostępne na stronie internetowej

http://eippcb.jrc.es.

----

(1)Dz.U. L 257 z 10.10.1996, str. 26.

----

----

Brak sprzeciwu wobec zgłoszonej koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.4291 — Voestalpine/Profilafroid/SAP)

(2006/C 253/04)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

W dniu 19 września 2006 r. Komisja podjęła decyzję o nie sprzeciwianiu się wyżej wymienionej koncentracji oraz uznaniu jej za zgodną z regułami wspólnego rynku. Powyższa decyzja zostaje wydana na mocy art. 6 ust. 1 lit. b) rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 139/2004. Pełny tekst decyzji jest dostępny wyłącznie w języku angielskim i będzie opublikowany po uprzednim usunięciu ewentualnych tajemnic handlowych przedsiębiorstw. Tekst decyzji będzie dostępny:

----

----

Brak sprzeciwu wobec zgłoszonej koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.4256 — Xstrata/Falconbridge)

(2006/C 253/05)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

W dniu 13 lipca 2006 r. Komisja podjęła decyzję o nie sprzeciwianiu się wyżej wymienionej koncentracji oraz uznaniu jej za zgodną z regułami wspólnego rynku. Powyższa decyzja zostaje wydana na mocy art. 6 ust. 1 lit. b) rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 139/2004. Pełny tekst decyzji jest dostępny wyłącznie w języku angielskim i będzie opublikowany po uprzednim usunięciu ewentualnych tajemnic handlowych przedsiębiorstw. Tekst decyzji będzie dostępny:

----

----

Brak sprzeciwu wobec zgłoszonej koncentracji

(Sprawa nr COMP/M.4332 — MEAS/DSPL/Sadoport)

(2006/C 253/06)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

W dniu 3 października 2006 r. Komisja podjęła decyzję o nie sprzeciwianiu się wyżej wymienionej koncentracji oraz uznaniu jej za zgodną z regułami wspólnego rynku. Powyższa decyzja zostaje wydana na mocy art. 6 ust. 1 lit. b) rozporządzenia Rady (WE) nr 139/2004. Pełny tekst decyzji jest dostępny wyłącznie w języku portugalskim i będzie opublikowany po uprzednim usunięciu ewentualnych tajemnic handlowych przedsiębiorstw. Tekst decyzji będzie dostępny:

----
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 10

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 55 Att. 17

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-18 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 10 of 10
SEP-28-99 20:08 FROM: KINKOS ID: 7145161853 PAGE 2/3

\ we

O54
—— AW

Cynthia L. Johnson

Director, Cash Management Policy and Planning Division
Financial Management Service, Room 420, 421

14” Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20227

Re: 31 CFR Part 203, Payment of Federal Taxes and the Treasury Tax and Loan Program
Dear Ms. Johnson:

Western Corporate Federal Credit Union (WesCorp) appreciates the opportunity to comment on
the U.S. Treasury’s proposed rule change regarding the rate of interest charged Treasury Tax &
Loan (TT&L) depositaries for the use of Treasury funds.

WesCorp is the largest of 36 corporate credit unions in the nation, providing financial services
for credit unions including investments, credit, item processing and electronic payment services
to more than 900 credit unions in our field of membership, which is the nine Western states. The
views expressed in this letter represent only those of WesCorp.

WesCorp is a $12 billion corporate credit union and a participant in the TT&L program for six
years, Currently, our participation is capped at $1.1 billion, which allows us to leverage unused
capital,

Because TT&L deposits can be called with same-day notification, WesCorp invests these funds
in overnight alternatives—primarily fed fund based investments. This allows us to earn a
minimal return of 20 basis points, significantly lower than the spread on term funding. An even
lower spread would not allow WesCorp to continue to receive TT&L note balances.

Treasury’s proposed change to an overnight repurchase agreement rate would effectively
increase the yield to the Treasury at the expense of the participants. To retain an acceptable
return, WesCotp would have to take interest rate risk by running mismatches against term
investments. This would entail added costs in capital allocations and operating expenses, as well
as potentially increased staff. We do not view this as an effective use of WesCorp’s resources.

Under the proposed rule change, we would at times, be operating at a loss if we were to continue
to receive TT&L note balances. Unless WesCorp can—with minimum operating
overhead—receive TT&L note balances with a reasonable expectation of a 20 basis point return,
then WesCorp cannot justify continuing participation in the TT&L program to our members.


SEP-28-99 28:08 FROM:KINKOS 1D: 7145161053 PAGE 373

WesCorp comment letter
Treasury proposed rule 31 CFR Part 203

Page 2

Thank you again, for the opportunity to comment on Treasury’s proposed rule change.

Respectfully,

. Johnson
Presidéfit/Chief Executive Officer
WesCorp
EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
            ----------------------------------      


     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
registration statements of IBP, inc. on Form S-3 (File No.
33-64459) and on Form S-8 (File No. 33-19441) of our report
dated January 24, 1997, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule of IBP,
inc. as of December 28, 1996 and December 30, 1995 and for the 
years ended December 28, 1996 and December 30, 1995, which
report is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on 
Form 10-K.


COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.

Omaha, Nebraska
March 27, 1997



EXHIBIT 23.2


                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
                 ----------------------------------


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-19441 and 1-6085)
relating to the IBP 1987 and 1993 Stock Option Plans of our
report dated February 3, 1995 appearing on page 23 of the 1994
Annual Report to Stockholders which is incorporated by reference
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report on the Financial
Statement Schedule, which appears on page 12 of this Annual 
Report on Form 10-K.



PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 27, 1997
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

Number Name Description

Fatal/Proposed

Analytical Type

Applicable SMAF Attribute

/ Domain Value Left Side Label 

1

Fund Balance With Treasury

The sum of USSGL accounts 101000 and 153200 must equal Fund Balance With Treasury from the Central Accounting and Reporting System (CARS).

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 USSGL / SMAF All FBWT

50

Normal Warrants Edit

The BETC balances from the Central Accounting and Reporting System (CARS) that represent all the normal warrant activity should equal USSGL account 310100.

Fatal Period # 10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Summary Report

Bulletin No. 2017-16 DRAFT VII ESR - 1
February 15, 1952

No. 56393.

Suit 4685.

#### Maggi Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

Abstract 55429 affirmed November 7, 1951. C. A. D. 473.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Communications Commission

          - 47 CFR Part 15 
          - [ET Docket No. 98-153; FCC 03-33] 

# AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission. 

# ACTION:

Final rule; announcement of effective date. 

# SUMMARY:

                        The Commission adopted new rules on the labeling of digital television receivers and other consumer electronics receiving devices. Certain rules contained new modified information collection requirements and were published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 27, 2000. This document announces the effective date of these published rules.                     

# DATES:

The amendment to § 15.525 (b) and (e) published at 68 FR 19746, April 22, 2003, became effective on April 5, 2006. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Nancy J. Brooks, Office of Engineering and Technology, Policy and Rules Division, (202) 418-2454. 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On April 5, 2006, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the information collection requirements contained in Section 15.525 (a) and (e), pursuant to OMB Control No. 3060-1015. Accordingly, the information collection requirements contained in these rules became effective on April 5, 2006. 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. E7-3060 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
# attribtable--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout March 1, 2018
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 454 Filed 03/20/09 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 454 Filed 03/20/09 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 454 Filed 03/20/09 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 454 Filed 03/20/09 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 454 Filed 03/20/09 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 454 Filed 03/20/09 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 454 Filed 03/20/09 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 454 Filed 03/20/09 Page 8 of 8
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy Defendants’

Response In Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel the Deposition of Bud

Aiken, in support thereof, to be served by United States Mail, First Class Service,

properly addressed and postage prepaid, upon the following:

Anita F. Alberts, Esquire

301 South Main Street

The Atrium, Suite W-2

Doylestown, PA 18901

Attorney for Plaintiff

 S/Sidney L. Gold, Esquire -SG-1387 

SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

Attorney for Defendants 

DATE: March 19, 2004

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 13-2 Filed 03/19/2004 Page 1 of 1