alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Action brought on 4 September 2006 — Arpaillange and Others v Commission

(Case F-104/06)

(2006/C 261/73)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Joséphine Arpaillange (Santiago do Chile, Chile) and Others (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought by the applicants

The applicants claim that the Court should:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants, after having worked for several years in Commission delegations outside the Community with the status of individual experts, were recruited with the status of contract staff, following the disappearance of the other status.

At the time of the applicants' grading, the Commission recognised them as having less professional experience than that which they submit they had actually gained, and, in any event, less than that which they were recognised as having acquired at the time of their recruitment as individual experts.

In support of their action, the applicants plead breach of the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities (‘Conditions of Employment’) on the ground that Article 2 of the General Provisions for Implementing the procedures governing the engagement and the employment of contract staff of 7 April 2004 (‘GPI’) imposes a requirement for the engagement of contract staff — one year of appropriate professional experience — which is not required by Article 82 of the Conditions of Employment.

Furthermore, the applicants submit that, at the time of the evaluation of their professional experience, the Commission infringed the principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations, was in breach of the duty to have regard for the interests of officials and made a manifest error of assessment.

Next, the applicants plead infringement of the principles of equal treatment and of non-discrimination on the grounds; first, that the GPI provide that staff having nearly 20 years of experience are graded in the same grade as staff having no more than seven years' experience; second, that contract staff covered by Article 3a of the Conditions of Employment, such as the applicants, and those covered by Article 3b of the Conditions of Employment are treated differently, in terms of possible grading on recruitment, and of developing their professional experience and career, whereas their situation is comparable; third, that compensation for loss of income, such as that which is provided for former local staff has not been provided for former individual experts.

Finally, the applicants allege breach of the principle of respect for vested rights, because of, first, a consequent reduction in their salary for identical duties and, second, the failure to take into account the years for which they had worked with the status of individual experts for the purposes of their grading in step and for the purposes of the conversion of their contracts as contract staff for a limited period into contracts for a fixed term.

----
Notes from Meeting with Bob Spurgin

Attended by:

Spurgin and Associates: Bob Spurgin

EPA Staff: Kristin Fitzgerald

Date: January 24, 2014

EPA had a call with Bob Spurgin. He mentioned again that practice among POTWs varies, but 

one POTW in San Francisco is allowing aqueous pharmaceuticals to be discharged to it.
Part 2 Fiscal Year 2020 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section III

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Account Transaction Categories

TRANSACTION

CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION

Bulletin No. 2019-10 III AC - 1 June 2019

A. Funding

100 - 399 Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections

400 - 699 Authority Transfers

700 - 799 Reimbursables and Other Income

B. Disbursements and Payables

100 - 299 Payments/Purchases

300 - 399 Commitments/Undelivered Orders/Expended Authority - Unpaid

400 - 599 Payables/Accrued Liabilities

600 - 699 Advances and Prepayments

C. Collections and Receivables

100 - 399 Receipts

400 - 599 Receivables/Accrued Revenue

600 - 799 Asset Sale and Disposition (Gains and Losses)

D. Adjustments/Writeoffs/Reclassification

100 - 299 Upward and Downward Adjustments

300 - 399 Prior-Period Adjustments

400 - 499 Writeoffs

500 - 799 Reclassification/Revaluation

E. Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections

100 - 399 Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499 Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above

500 - 799 Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

F. Yearend

100 - 299 Preclosing Entries

300 - 499 Closing Entries

G. Memorandum Entries

100 - 299 All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

H. Other Specialized Transaction Entries

100 - 799 Other
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, :

: CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff :

:

v. : No. 02-CV-4435

:

:

DAVID FORREST AND :

T. BEAUCLERC ROGERS IV :

:

Defendant. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter our appearance for Defendant David Forrest.

DUANE MORRIS LLP

By:

Edward M. Dunham, Jr.,

Pennsylvania I.D. No. 21550

One Liberty Place

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

(215) 979-1148 (Direct Dial)

(215) 979-1020 (fax)

emdunham@duanemorris.com

Attorney for Defendant

Dated: October 9, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 8 Filed 10/09/2002 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Edward M. Dunham, Jr., hereby certify that on this date a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Entry of Appearance was served via first class mail and facsimile upon the following:

Jeffrey R. Lerman, Esquire

Glenn F. Rosenblum, Esquire

Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhodes, LLP

123 South broad Street

Philadelphia, PA 19109

Edward P. Krugman, Esquire

Cahill, Gordon & Reindel

80 Pine Street

New York, New York 10005

James J. Rohn, Esquire

Nicholas M. Cantrella, Esquire

Kevin Dooley Kent, Esquire

Conrad O’Brien Gellman & Rohn, P.C.

1515 Market Street, 16th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19102

Edward M. Dunham, Jr.

Dated: October 9, 2002

PH2\679932.1

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 8 Filed 10/09/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 58512.

protest 224428-K (F) (New York).

#### American Wine Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was*fetipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the 3 cases of alcoholic beverages covered by warehouse entry No. 71765 and 10 cases of alcoholic beverages covered by warehouse entry No. 6824, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. (the  "Partnership")
for the  period  ended  April 1, 2005 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Kathleen Skero,
Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 12, 2005
_____________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DUARTE BLAMO DAVIES : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL : NO. 02-4459

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2002, upon

consideration of petitioner Duarte Blamo Davies' application to

proceed in forma pauperis, and the Court finding that petitioner

is unable to pay costs or fees or give security therefor, it is

hereby ORDERED that petitioner's application to proceed in forma

pauperis is GRANTED and petitioner may proceed without prepayment

of fees or costs.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

Stewart Dalzell, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04459-SD Document 7 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Saucony, Inc. on Forms S-8 (file numbers 33-50922, 33-61532, 33-66482, 33-80726,
333-33485) of our report dated March 15, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated
financial  statements  and  financial  statement  schedule of Saucony,  Inc. and
Subsidiaries  as of January 1, 1999 and  January 2, 1998 and for the years ended
January 1, 1999,  January 2, 1998,  and January 3, 1997 which report is included
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




                                          PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 1999
No. P68/289.

protest 65/12670 (New York).

#### Abercrombie & Fitch Co. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of “original miniatures” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Abercrombie*& *Fitch Company*v. *United States*(49 CCPA 129, C.A.D. 808), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
December 4, 1953

No. 57679.

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 162855-K/2975 and 170790-K/2815.

C. D. 1548. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOE RAYMOND CASTILLO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0737 GEB GGH P

vs.

CALIFORNIA YOUTH AUTHORITY, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

The parties are required to submit a joint status report addressing the following

matters:

 1. Service of process;

 2. Possible joinder of additional parties;

 3. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings;

 4. Jurisdiction and venue;

 5. Anticipated motions and the scheduling thereof;

 6. Anticipated discovery and the scheduling thereof;

 7. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cutoff dates for discovery

and law and motion and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial;

 8. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due to the

Case 2:04-cv-00737-GEB-GGH Document 35 Filed 10/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

relative simplicity or complexity of the action or proceedings;

 9. Whether this matter is to be tried before this court or the district court. See

28 U.S.C. § 636(c);

 10. Whether the counsel will stipulate to the trial judge acting as settlement

judge and waiving any disqualifications by virtue of his so acting, or whether they prefer to have

a Settlement Conference before another judge;

 11. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of

this matter.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file the joint status

report described above within thirty days of the date of this order; following receipt of the status

report, the court will issue a scheduling order.

DATED: 10/6/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

cas737.sch

Case 2:04-cv-00737-GEB-GGH Document 35 Filed 10/06/05 Page 2 of 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JAMES BERNARD BULL, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2459

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed April 24, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Michelle Sisco, 

Judge.

James Bernard Bull, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, KHOUZAM, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Exhibit 32.1
Park City Group, Inc.
& Subsidiaries
Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the annual Report
of Park City Group, Inc. (the Company) on form 10-KSB for the year ending June
30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Randall K. Fields, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| |  | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | (2) |  | The
information contained in the Report           fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: September 28, 2006

/s/ Randall K. FieldsPrincipal Executive Officer, CEO

(REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
Transfer of Current Year Authority

2004_transfer_in_cy.xls Spreadsheet

T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 C1 C2 C3 C4

Abbreviated Account Titles

Beginning 

ATB

UDO 

without 

Advances

Delivered 

Orders 

Unpaid

Unobligated 

Balances

Subtotal 

From 1151

Undelivered 

Orders Paid Assets

Subtotal 

before 

Closing

Closing 

Entries 

Proprietary 1

Closing 

Entries 

Budgetary 1

Closing 

Entries 

Budgetary 2

Closing 

Entries 

Budgetary 3

1010 FBwT - 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00

1410 Advances - - 800.00 800.00

1750 Equipment - - 1,000.00 1,000.00

2110 Accounts Payable - (1,000.00) (1,000.00) (1,000.00)

3100 Unexpended Approp Cumul -

3101 Unexpended Approp Receiv - - -

3102 Unexpended Approp Transfer - (1,000.00) (1,500.00) (2,500.00) (800.00) (3,300.00)

3107 Unexpended Approp Used - - -

3310 Cumulative Results - - - (1,000.00)

5200 Revenue from Services - - -

5700 Expended Approp. - - -

5720 Transferred In - - (1,000.00) (1,000.00) 1,000.00

5755 Non-Expend Transfer In - - - -

6100 Operating Expenses - - -

 Total - - - - - - - - - - -

4170 Transfers CY - 1,500.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 (1,500.00)

4119 Other Approp. Realized - - -

4190 Transfers PY - - -

4195 Transfer Obligated Bal - 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 800.00 2,800.00 (2,800.00)

4201 Total Actual Resources - - - 4,300.00

4450 Unapportioned Authority - (1,500.00) (1,500.00) (1,500.00)

4610 Allotments Realized - - -

4801 UDO Unpaid - - -

4802 UDO Paid - - -

4831 UDO Transferred Unpaid - (1,000.00) (1,000.00) (1,000.00)

4832 UDO Transferred Paid - - (800.00) (800.00)

4901 DO Unpaid - - - (1,000.00)

4902 DO Paid - - -

4931 DO Transferred Unpaid - (1,000.00) (1,000.00) (1,000.00) 1,000.00

 Total - - - - - - - - - - - -
Transfer of Current Year Authority

2004_transfer_in_cy.xls Spreadsheet

C5 C6 C7

Closing 

Entries 

Budgetary 4

Closing 

Entries 

Budgetary 5

Closing 

Entries 

Proprietary 2

Post Closing 

ATB

 3,500.00

 800.00

 1,000.00

 (1,000.00)

 (3,300.00) (3,300.00)

 -

 3,300.00 -

 -

 (1,000.00)

 -

 -

 -

 -

 -

 - - -

 -

 -

 -

 -

 4,300.00

 (1,500.00)

 -

 (1,000.00) (1,000.00)

 (800.00) (800.00)

 1,000.00 -

 800.00 -

 (1,000.00)

 -

 -

 - - -
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-01287-SD Document 1 Filed 03/18/05 Page 17 of 17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           7,494
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        110,671
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,024
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,061
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     57,500
<COMMON>                                           500
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,963
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 121,024
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    783
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   783
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              783
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    683
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         683
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       683
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.85
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View a Custom Label

To view a custom label, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, click Manage Organizations>Custom Labels>View. The 

Select OTC Endpoint page appears.

2. Select the highest-level organization for which you would like to view the custom labels. The 

View Custom Labels page appears showing the custom labels that are in effect for the 

organization hierarchy as shown in Figure 1

Figure 1. View Custom Labels

.

• Click Cancel to return to the OTCnet Home Page. No data is saved. 

• Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

Additional Buttons