alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 61823.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 264104-K (New York).

*519Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of parts of photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, parts for enlargers are properly dutiable as parts of photographic cameras under paragraph 1551, the claim of the plaintiff at 20 percent was sustained as to said items. Following *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protest was dismissed as to the items marked “B,” and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and
Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), Chris L.
Branscum, the Chief Executive Officer of Repeater Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company"), and Timothy A. Marcotte, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 28,
2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.1 (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the
period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the Company
for the period covered by the Periodic Report.

Dated:   August 9, 2002

/s/ CHRIS L. BRANSCUM                           /s/ TIMOTHY A. MARCOTTE
-------------------------------                 --------------------------------
Chris L. Branscum                               Timothy A. Marcotte
Chief Executive Officer                         Chief Financial Officer
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 ! (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 " (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # !
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # "
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # #
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # $
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # %
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # &
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # '
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 # (
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $ )
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $

1 ' + *7 3' 1 ')0 )' 8 + 09: ' ; 3 < ' 3 ; ); )= < ' 3 ;
! "# $ & '( ) ' *( + , - . '/ 0' 1 2 ' 3 4 - 5 6 6 $ !

: ' > 9? @' A B C D E A F A B D G H I F A E I J F D K D F F L G A B C

F L I L B B A F H H M N B L I H I M B C O 6# O L F P . D E N A B A B .

B D G H I C J L Q J . . H J L P C B L L R M H . D H S S A . D B K H I A Q L
exhibit102.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    Note

     

    $5,000,000.00                                                                                                                                                         June 26,
2008

     

                                New York, New
York

     

    


    The
undersigned (“Borrower”), for value
received, promises to pay to the order of FOURTH THIRD LLC (“Lender”) at the
principal office of FOURTH THIRD LLC (the “Agent”) in New York
City, New York the principal sum of $5,000,000, representing the aggregate
unpaid amount of the Loan made to Borrower by Lender pursuant to the Credit
Agreement referred to below, such principal amount to be payable on the dates
set forth in the Credit Agreement.

     

    Borrower
further promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of the Loan from
the date of such Loan until such Loan is Paid in Full, payable at the rate(s)
and at the time(s) set forth in the Credit Agreement.  Payments of
both principal and interest are to be made in lawful money of the United States
of America to the deposit account located in New York City and identified in the
Credit Agreement.

     

    This Note
evidences indebtedness incurred under, and is subject to the terms and
provisions of, a certain Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June
__, 2008 (as heretofore amended, and as further amended, supplemented, restated
or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”;
terms not otherwise defined herein are used herein as defined in the Credit
Agreement), among Borrower, the other Loan Parties named therein, the financial
institutions (including Lender) party thereto from time to time and Agent, to
which Credit Agreement reference is hereby made for a statement of the terms and
provisions under which this Second Amended and Restated Note may or must be paid
prior to its due date or its due date accelerated.

     

    This Note is made under and governed by
the laws of the State of New York applicable to contracts made and to be
performed entirely within such State.

    


    


    [signature
page follows]

     


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    


     

    DURANT
BIOFUELS, LLC

    


    


    By: /s/ Dennis G. McLaughlin, III    

    Title:  Chief
Executive Officer
No. 63634.

protests 159982-K, etc. (New York).

#### Albert Bonnier Publishing House and Milton Snedeker Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, X

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1 

### Yates, Lawrence - AMS

From: Daniel Schaefer <Daniel_Schaefer@cargill.com>

Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 4:11 PM

To: AMS - Beefcarcassrevisions; Yates, Lawrence - AMS

Cc: Glen Dolezal; Bill Thoni; Megan Hobbs; Daniel Genho; Scott Howard

Subject: Docket AMS LPS 14-052 Beef Carcass Revisions

Attachments: 0437_001.pdf

Cargill comments relative to beef grading attached.

ds

Dan Schaefer

VP By Products

Cargill Beef

151 N. Main

Wichita, KS 67202

316 291 3409

316 304 5686
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>       THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION
               EXTRACTED FROM  THE QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT  TO SECTION
               13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES  EXCHANGE  ACT  OF 1934 FOR
               THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                   JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             23,971
<SECURITIES>                                       82,287
<RECEIVABLES>                                      13,286
<ALLOWANCES>                                        1,258
<INVENTORY>                                         5,530
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  126,478
<PP&E>                                              5,798
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    230,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              28,090
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                               22
<OTHER-SE>                                        202,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      230,740
<SALES>                                            58,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   58,344
<CGS>                                              46,175
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      46,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   60,866
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (45,122)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (45,122)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (45,122)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (2.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (2.27)



</TABLE>
No. 60047.

#### Vita Food Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 280269-K and 283805-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the invoice in protest 280269-K consists of herring, prepared or preserved in any manner, packed in airtight containers weighing with their contents not more than 15 pounds each, the claim at 6}4 percent under paragraph 718 (b), as modified, *supra,*supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52782), was sustained. The merchandise covered by the invoice in protest 283805-K, stipulated to consist of herring, pickled or salted, in immediate containers weighing with their contents more than 15 pounds each, was held dutiable at one-half of 1 cent per pound, net, under paragraph 719, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), as claimed.
No. 64782.

#### Overseas Finance & Trading Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 313549-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C.D. 1619), the protest was dismissed, and the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in -the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)).
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Self-Register/Create an Account in SailPoint IIQ

To self-register in SailPoint IIQ, navigate to the SailPoint IIQ environment at: 

https://iiq.fiscal.treasury.gov/ and complete the following steps:

1. Log in using PIV/CAC or ID.me credentials as shown in Figure 1. 

Figure 1. SailPoint IIQ Login Page

2. Follow the on-screen instructions to sign in with an existing account or create an account.

3. If prompted, follow the on-screen instructions to verify your identity. 

4. After completing all steps, you should see the SailPoint IIQ home page. 

New OTCnet users including those with PIV/CAC access should go through SailPoint 

IIQ to do the self-registration to create an account and request role(s) and high-level 

org(s) before logging to OTCnet. Once their high-level access is approved in SailPoint 

IIQ, they can proceed to login to OTCnet. 

Application Tip
Before the First Division,

February 19, 1952

No. 56397.

protests 173489-K, etc. (New York).

#### Anco Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONEL CANTU LOPEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0822 LKK KJM P

vs.

DIANE BUTLER, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with an action

filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed May 23, 2006, the court found service of plaintiff’s

second amended complaint appropriate for one defendant but gave plaintiff the opportunity to

file a third amended complaint. On June 1, 2006, plaintiff notified the court he wished to

proceed with the second amended complaint. 

The second amended complaint states a cognizable claim for relief under 42

U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). If the allegations of this amended complaint are

proven, plaintiff has a reasonable opportunity to prevail on the merits of this action.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Service is appropriate for the following defendant: Bunnell.

///// 

Case 2:04-cv-00822-LKK -KJM Document 22 Filed 06/20/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff one USM-285 form, one summons,

an instruction sheet and a copy of the second amended complaint filed December 27, 2005.

3. Within thirty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the

attached Notice of Submission of Documents and submit the following documents to the court:

a. The completed Notice of Submission of Documents;

b. One completed summons;

c. One completed USM-285 form for the defendant listed in number 1

above; and 

d. Two copies of the endorsed second amended complaint filed December

27, 2005. 

4. Plaintiff need not attempt service on defendant and need not request waiver of

service. Upon receipt of the above-described documents, the court will direct the United States

Marshal to serve the above-named defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4

without payment of costs. 

DATED: June 19, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

lope0822.1amd

Case 2:04-cv-00822-LKK -KJM Document 22 Filed 06/20/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LEONEL CANTU LOPEZ,

Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-04-0822 LKK KJM P 

vs.

DIANE BUTLER, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 1 completed summons form

 1 completed USM-285 forms

 2 copies of the 12/27/05 

 Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-00822-LKK -KJM Document 22 Filed 06/20/06 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MELVIN LEE WILSON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0478 GEB GGH P

vs.

SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Defendant’s summary judgment motion is pending before the court. Because it is

unlikely that this motion will be resolved before the pretrial conference and jury trial, these dates

are vacated.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial conference set for

January 6, 2006, and the jury trial set for March 7, 2006, before the Honorable Garland E. Burrell

are vacated; these dates will be re-set at a later date if appropriate.

DATED: 1/10/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00478-GEB-GGH Document 35 Filed 01/10/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of PSB  BancGroup,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  "Report"),  I, Robert W. Woodard,
President and Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   To my knowledge,  the information  contained in the Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.









Date:  October 31, 2002                    By:  /s/ Robert W. Woodard
       ----------------                    -------------------------------------
                                                Robert W. Woodard, President and
                                                Chief Executive Officer
No. 52564.

protests 57256-K, etc. (New York).

#### John Alban & Co., Inc., et al. v. United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Certain items of the merchandise stipulated to consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269 were held subject to an allowance for tare of inedible coverings of 2)4 percent from the net weight reported by the United States Weigher.
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 80 Att. 9

Dockets.Justia.com
Before the Third Division,

June 20, 1941

No. 46102.

#### Protests 768300-G, etc., of Pittsburgh Casing Co. (Pittsburgh).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

On the authority of *Lamborn*v. *United States*(27 C. C. P. A. 46, C. A. D. 60) the protests were dismissed.
No. 51669.

#### Protests 821318-G, etc., of Alexander & Baldwin, Ltd., et al. (Honolulu, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 57992.

protests 156950-K, etc. (New York).

#### John Alban & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fontana Hollywood Corp.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 1503), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 46687.

#### Protests 30167-K, etc., of Seaboard Lumber Sales Co., Ltd. (Bridgeport).

*415Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed only on the net footage imported. The protests were sustained to that extent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Criminal No. 01-455-A

)

ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI )

a/k/a “Shaqil,” )

a/k/a “Abu Khalid )

al Sahrawi,” )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Before the Court are the pro se defendant’s pleadings docketed

as #s 1116 and 1117. Read generously, Docket # 1116 is a request

for a copy of the classified report of Congress concerning

September 11th, and Docket # 1117 is a request for reconsideration

of the Order of October 2, 2003, which imposed sanctions on the

government and is presently the subject of an interlocutory appeal.

On November 5, 2003, the Court stayed all further action in

this case, to conserve resources while the appeal is processed. By

a separate order issued on November 5, 2003, Mr. Moussaoui was

placed on clear notice that he faced sanctions, including losing

his right to represent himself, if he filed “further frivolous,

scandalous, disrespectful or repetitive pleadings,” or violated any

Court orders. By a letter dated November 7, 2003, the Court

informally reminded Mr. Moussaoui of the sanctions he faced if he

continued to send such writings to the Court.

Pleadings #s 1116 and 1117 violate the two orders of November
2

5, 2003. First, they ask for relief after the Court made clear

that all action in this case was stayed. Second, Docket # 1116

asks for relief to which the defendant knows he is not entitled.

Specifically, the defendant has been advised on numerous occasions

that he cannot have access to classified material. Docket # 1117

merely expresses the defendant’s dissatisfaction with the October

2, 2003 Opinion. It offers no new evidence or argument, and is

therefore cumulative of what defendant has previously filed.

Third, both pleadings include contemptuous language that would

never be tolerated from an attorney, and will no longer be

tolerated from this defendant.

Based on the defendant’s repeated violation of orders of this

Court, he has forfeited his right to represent himself any further

in this case. For these reasons, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Order issued on June 14, 2002, granting

defendant’s request to represent himself be and is VACATED; and it

is further 

ORDERED that standby counsel are appointed as counsel of

record for the defendant. The Court will only accept for filing

pleadings submitted by counsel of record. Anything submitted to

the Court by the defendant will simply be received for archival

purposes, with a copy sent only to defense counsel.

If defendant wants to appeal this decision, he must file a
3

written notice of appeal within ten days with the Clerk of this

Court.

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to

counsel of record and the defendant.

Entered this 14th day of November, 2003. 

_________/s/________________

Leonie M. Brinkema

United States District Judge

Alexandria, Virginia