alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      10.1

    


    THIRD
      ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER AND REORGANIZATION DATED MARCH 20,
      2008
      AMONG SINGLE TOUCH SYSTEMS INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HOSTING SITE NETWORK, INC.),
      SINGLE TOUCH ACQUISITION CORP. AND SINGLE TOUCH INTERACTIVE,
      INC.

    


    This
      Addendum is made and entered into as of the 27th
      day of
      June 2008. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this
      Addendum shall have the meaning given to them as in the Agreement and Plan
      of
      Merger and Reorganization.

    


    NOW,
      THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants contained herein and
      intending to be legally bound hereby, the Parties hereto agree as
      follows:

    


    1. Section
      8.2 of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization is amended to read
      as
      follows:

    


    “8.2. TERMINATION
      FOR FAILURE TO CLOSE.

    


    This
      Agreement shall be automatically terminated if the Closing Date shall not have
      occurred by July 31, 2008, unless extended in writing by mutual agreement of
      both the Parent and the Company”.

    


    2. All
      other
      terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization shall continue
      with
      full force and effect.

    


    3. This
      Addendum may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall
      be
      deemed to be an original, but all of which taken together shall constitute
      one
      and the same agreement.

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, this Addendum has been executed by the Parties as of the date
      first above written:

    


    
      	
              PARENT:

            	 
	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH SYSTEMS INC.

            	 
	 	 
	
              By: /s/
                Scott Vicari   

            	 
	
              Name: Scott
                Vicari

            	 
	
              Title: President

               

            	 
	 	 
	
              ACQUISITION
                SUBSIDIARY:

            	
              COMPANY:

            
	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH ACQUISITION CORP.

            	
              SINGLE
                TOUCH INTERACTIVE, INC.

            
	 	 
	
              By:  /s/
                Scott Vicari   

            	
              By:  /s/
                Anthony Macaluso  

            
	
              Name: Scott
                Vicari

            	
              Name: Anthony
                Macaluso

            
	
              Title: President

               

            	
              Title: Chief
                Executive Officer
----

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 July 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 33 de Madrid — Spain) — Sonia Chacón Navas v Eurest Colectividades SA

(Case C-13/05) (1)

(Directive 2000/78/EC - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Concept of disability)

(2006/C 224/15)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 33 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sonia Chacón Navas

Defendant: Eurest Colectividades SA

Re:

Interpretation of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ L 303, p. 16) — Scope — Dismissal on grounds of sickness — Sickness and disability.

Operative part of the judgment

----

(1)OJ C 69, 19.3.2005.

----
**Part 1 	 	Fiscal Year 2019 Reporting**

**SUPPLEMENT 	 	Section III**

**U.S. Standard General Ledger**

**Account Transaction Postings**

**Part 1 	 	Fiscal Year 2019 Reporting**

**SUPPLEMENT 	 	Section III**

**U.S. Standard General Ledger**

**Account Transaction Postings**

**Part 1 	 	Fiscal Year 2019 Reporting**

**SUPPLEMENT 	 	Section III**

**U.S. Standard General Ledger**

**Account Transaction Postings**

**R = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Reverse’ in the Comment. 	 AP = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Also Post’ in the Comment.**

****

**Bulletin No. 2019-10 	III AP -****1 	June 2019**

**R = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Reverse’ in the Comment. 	 AP = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Also Post’ in the Comment.**

****

**Bulletin No. 2019-10 	III AP -****1 	June 2019**

**R = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Reverse’ in the Comment. 	 AP = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Also Post’ in the Comment.**

****

**Bulletin No. 2019-10 	III AP -****1 	June 2019**
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 23

- 00336

- CV

I N RE K ENT K

ADDATZ

, Relator §

§

§

§

§ Original Proceeding

43rd District Court of Parker County,

Texas

Trial Court No. CV23

- 0960

November 2, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice

Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and holds

that the petition should be conditionally granted. Accordingly, we conditionally grant

the writ of mandamus and direct the trial court to vacate its or der granting Oil Patch

Group, In c. ’ s Rule 202 petition and render an order de nying the same. W rit will issue

only if the trial court fails to comply.

It is further ordered that Real Party in I n terest Oil Pat ch G roup, Inc. shall pay

all of the costs of this proceeding, for which let execution issue.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
NUMBER 13-09-00701-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

GERALD D. SHEETS, Appellant,

v.

THE OKONITE COMPANY, Appellee.

_____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 347th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellee The Okonite Company (“Okonite”) has filed an unopposed motion to

dismiss the appeal as to appellant Gerald D. Sheets (“Sheets”) on grounds that Sheets had

all claims non-suited or otherwise dismissed against Okonite.
2

The Court, having considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the

motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. Appellee’s unopposed motion to

dismiss is granted, and the appeal brought by appellant Gerald D. Sheets against The

Okonite Company is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 14th

day of January, 2010.
19.03
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT F

Edit

No

Prior 

Year 

USSGL 

Account

Beginning

Ending 

Balance 

Indicator

Authority

Type Code

TAS 

Status

Reporting

Type Code

TAS Status 

Transitioning 

Code

21 426800 E 21 411991 E 21 411992 E 21 411993 E 21 411994 E 21 435190 E 21 429590 E 45 119090 E 45 135090 E 45 135990 E 45 591910 E U 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Closing Edits Detail Report

Draft Bulletin No. 2017-06 VII CER - 1
----

----

I Informace

Komise

----

Směnné kurzy vůči euru (1)

25. září 2006

(2006/C 231/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Zdroj: referenční směnné kurzy jsou publikovány ECB.

----

----

Předběžné oznámení o spojení podniků

(Případ č.j. COMP/M.4319 – Mondi/Schleipen & Erkens)

(2006/C 231/02)

(Text s významem pro EHP)

----

(1)Úř. věst. L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

----

----

Předběžné oznámení o spojení podniků

(Případ č.j. COMP/M.4396 – Apollo Group/TNT Logistics)

Případ, který může být posouzen ve zjednodušeném řízení

(2006/C 231/03)

(Text s významem pro EHP)

----

(1)Úř. věst. L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

(2)Úř. věst. C 56, 5.3.2005, s. 32.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         114,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  158,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   247,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               519,000
<PP&E>                                         697,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 149,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,485,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          407,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,485,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               378,000
<CGS>                                          412,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  412,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                151,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
No. 59481.

protests 196915-K, etc. (New York).

#### Jack Frank *&*Co. and Airport Clearance Service et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Edit an MVD Record

To edit an Master Verification Database (MVD) record, complete the following steps:

1. From the Check ProcessingError! Bookmark not defined. tab, select Manage 

Verification>Search MVD Record. The Step 1 of 4: Search MVD Record page appears. 

2. Enter the MVD search criteria and click Search.

• Enter the OTC Endpoint, required

• Check Include Subordinates, optional

• Enter the IRN (Individual Record Number)

• Enter the User Defined Field, optional

• Select the Search Type, optional

• Enter the Bank Routing Number, optional

• Enter the individual’s Account number, optional

• Select the Trade Status, optional

• Enter the From and To MVD Date, optional

The From and To MVD Date is the date that the returned record was created in the 

MVD.

3. Click Search to initiate the search. The records appear in a table.

4. Click the IRN hyperlink for the check whose details you would like to view. The Step 2 of 4: 

Review the MVD Record page appears. 

5. Click Edit to edit the MVD record. The Step 3 of 4: Edit the MVD Record page appears as 

shown in Figure 1. Edit the appropriate details.

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1. Edit Verification Record

6. Click Next.

• Select the Trade Status

A Cleared Trade Status removes the Deny Date from the verification record and 

accepts the record into the system.

• Enter the Deny Date

• The Deny Date indicates the date when the suspension period ends. 

• The Deny Date must be greater or equal to today's date and is mandatory for a 

Suspend Trade Status. 

• The Deny Date for a Denied and Blocked trade status defaults to 9/09/2099.

• Select a Return Reason Code

The Return Reason Description is not editable and appears after a Return Reason 

Code is selected.

• Enter a Note referencing the reason for suspending, denying, or blocking the record.

7. The Step 4 of 4: Review the edited MVD Record. Verify the verification record information is 

correct and click Submit. Click Edit to modify the information entered.

8. A Confirmation page appears stating that the MVD record has been updated.

Application Tip

Application Tips

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• Click Cancel to return to the OTCnet Home Page. No data is saved. 

• Click Check Image and Research Archive (CIRA) Detail to display CIRA details. 

(Visible only if is a CIRA record exists.)

• Click Edit to update the MVD record.

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

• Click Return Home to the OTCnet Home Page.

Additional Buttons
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4135 

To require broad agreement for changes to sentencing law. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 16, 2024 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. COTTON, and Mr. 

RUBIO) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require broad agreement for changes to sentencing law. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consensus in Sen5 tencing Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO SENTENCING COMMISSION VOT7 ING REQUIREMENT. 

8 Section 994(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 

9 amended, in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by strik10 ing ‘‘four’’ and inserting ‘‘5’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JASON DONNELL WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0050 DFL JFM P

vs.

MULE CREEK STATE PRISON,

Facility “C” Administration of

Department of Corrections, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme

Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent

prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In

certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991);

Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court

does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of

counsel will therefore be denied.

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00050-DFL -JFM Document 31 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s October 31, 2005 request

for the appointment of counsel is denied.

DATED: November 28, 2005. 

/kf

will0050.31

Case 2:04-cv-00050-DFL -JFM Document 31 Filed 11/30/05 Page 2 of 2
#### Alton B. HORNBACK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 01-5074.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 2, 2001.

Before MICHEL, CLEVENGER, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

*ORDER*

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

The court has received a March 28, 2001 order from the Court of Federal Claims.

On March 8, 2001, the Court of Federal Claims dismissed Alton B. Hornback’s complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Horn-back appealed on March 19, 2001. The trial court’s March 28 order states, in part:

> This court has determined that its March 8, 2001, opinion and order contains errors that arise from oversight and omission. The court failed to accurately characterize and respond to plaintiffs contentions as set forth in the complaint and in plaintiffs response to defendant’s motion to dismiss----

> It would seem an inefficient waste of judicial resources to proceed with appellate review of an opinion and order that this court recognizes is erroneous and stands ready to correct. Accordingly, this court requests that the Federal Circuit remand this action back to this court so as to permit this court to correct the errors contained in its March 8, 2001, opinion and order....

> Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The request is granted and this case is remanded to the Court of Federal Claims for further proceedings.
No. 64826.

#### Osan Supply Company *v.*United States,

protest 59/10852 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann, Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 7,849.

#### KIRKPATRICK v. LANGPHIER.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 85.] 3

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1802.

Debt Sur Boxd — Presumption of Payment— Evidence.

The obligee's indorsement of a payment upon a bond is not evidence to rebut the “presumption of payment, unless made with the privity of the obligor.

Debt, on bond payable in 1775. The defendant relied on the length of time to prove payment. The suit was brought in April, 1801. The plaintiff [Kirkpatrick’s executor] relies on an indorsement, dated December, 1781, in the handwriting of the testator, (who died in 17S4) in these words, “Ree’d, 20 Dec., 17S1, your account, for work done, sixty shillings. T. K.” The plaintiff also contended that five years during the war were to be deducted from the limiting time.

3

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

directed the jury that they may presume payment, and ought to presume it, if they should not be satisfied that the indorsement was made with the privitj' of the defendant. Verdict for defendant.
No. 50416.

#### Protests 843449-G, etc., of N. Minami & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Exhibit 23.3

Consent of Independent Engineers

We
hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and reports evaluating a portion of the crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves of Husky Energy Inc. as of December 31, 2014, and the information derived from our reports, as
described or incorporated by reference in the Companys Annual Report on Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the Companys registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-187135) and Form F-10 (File
No. 333-191849), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.

Sincerely,



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|Sproule Unconventional Limited       
|                                     
|/s/ Cameron Six                      
|Cameron P. Six, P.Eng.               
|Senior Vice-President, Unconventional
|And Director                         

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

February 27, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from financial
statements in the Form 10-Q of Brill Medial  Company,  LLC for the quarter ended
May 31, 1998 and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                FEB-28-1999  
<PERIOD-START>                                   MAR-01-1998  
<PERIOD-END>                                     MAY-31-1998  
<CASH>                                            11,001,000  
<SECURITIES>                                               0  
<RECEIVABLES>                                      5,869,000  
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0  
<INVENTORY>                                          588,000  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  18,731,000  
<PP&E>                                            21,320,000  
<DEPRECIATION>                                     9,218,000  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    69,195,000  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              7,881,000  
<BONDS>                                          110,027,000  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0  
<PREFERRED>                                                0  
<COMMON>                                                   0  
<OTHER-SE>                                      (48,713,000)  
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      69,195,000  
<SALES>                                           10,605,000  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  10,605,000  
<CGS>                                              8,838,000  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      8,838,000  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      41,000  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 2,904,000  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (1,179,000)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                          41,000  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (1,219,000)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0  
<CHANGES>                                                  0  
<NET-INCOME>                                     (1,219,000)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0  
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0  
                                                              
                                               

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 33-36707, 333-43625, 333-36444), Form S-4 (No.
333-50346), and Form S-8 (Nos. 33-19425, 33-25872, 33-48818, 33-56061, 33-57677,
33-58933, 33-59139, 33-62367, 33-65230, 333-16037, 333-42247, 333-44517,
333-68153, 333-82433, 333-83365, 333-95727) of FleetBoston Financial Corporation
of our report dated January 17, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
February 28, 2001
No. 49610.

#### Protests 81581-K, etc., of Sullivan & Kennedy et al. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Richardson*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 6, C. D. 823). In accordance therewith the claim at 5 percent under paragraph 731, as modified, was sustained.