alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CASE STUDIES IN EMERGENCY ELECTION LITIGATION

Federal Judicial Center 10/30/2023 1

Voting Rights for Annexed Territory 

Marascalco v. Grenada (Rhesa Barksdale, Neal B. 

Biggers, Jr., and Glen Davidson, N.D. Miss. 3:00-cv-61) 

Ten days before a municipal election, residents of recently annexed 

territory filed a federal complaint seeking to halt the election in 

which they would not be able to vote because the Justice Department denied preclearance to the annexation. A three-judge district 

court heard the case six days later and denied immediate relief. The 

court doubted its jurisdiction over the matter and expressed concern about the filing of the complaint nearly two months after the 

denial of preclearance. 

Subject: District lines. Topics: Enjoining elections; equal 

protection; three-judge court; section 5 preclearance; laches. 

Ten days before a May 1, 2000, election in Grenada, Mississippi, residents of 

recently annexed territory filed a federal complaint in the Northern District 

of Mississippi, seeking to halt the election in which they would not be able to 

vote.1

 The Justice Department had denied preclearance to the annexation.2

The plaintiffs claimed that although they were unable to vote, they nevertheless were subject to taxation and regulation by Grenada.3

A three-judge district court heard the case on April 7: Circuit Judge Rhesa Barksdale and District Judges Neal B. Biggers, Jr., and Glen Davidson.4

After a ten-minute recess, Judge Barksdale announced that the court would 

deny the plaintiffs a preliminary injunction.5 The court doubted its jurisdiction over the matter and the merits of the case, and the court expressed concern about the plaintiffs’ filing the complaint so long after the Justice Department’s March 3 denial of preclearance.6

The case was dismissed on the parties’ stipulation on August 2.7

1. Docket Sheet, Marascalco v. Grenada, No. 3:00-cv-61 (N.D. Miss. Apr. 21, 2000); 

Transcript at 3–8, id. (Apr. 27, 2000, filed Sept. 9, 2000), D.E. 14. 

2. Transcript, supra note 1, at 21. 

3. Id. at 6–7. 

4. Transcript, supra note 1; Docket Sheet, supra note 1. 

Jude Biggers died on October 15, 2023. Federal Judicial Center Biographical Directory of 

Article III Federal Judges, www.fjc.gov/history/judges. 

5. Transcript, supra note 1, at 124; see Docket Sheet, supra note 1 (D.E. 9). 

6. Transcript, supra note 1, at 124–26. 

7. Docket Sheet, supra note 1.
Before the First Division,

June 26, 1968

No. P68/283.

protests 58/21311 (A), etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Castelazo & Associates and Carrara Marble Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of polished marble slabs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Selectile*Co., *Inc., et al.*(49 CPA 116, C.A.D. 805), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Upgrade the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB) Application

To upgrade the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB) Application, complete the following steps:

1. Stop the OTCnet OLB application. From the desktop, double-click Stop OTCnet Local 

Bridge.

2. Locate the folder where the OTCnet OLB application is installed and uninstall it. 

3. After downloading the latest version of the OTCnet OLB application, locate the folder on the 

workstation where the OLB zip file resides e.g., your Downloads folder. Double click the zip 

file. Double click the .EXE file to start the installation. 

4. The Welcome to the OTCnet OLB Setup program dialog box appears as shown in Figure 1. 

Select Next.

Figure 1. Welcome to the OTCnet OLB Setup Dialog Box

• Select Cancel to cancel and exit the setup.

5. The Destination Location dialog box appears. Select Next.

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

As a best practice, it is recommended that the OLB application is installed into the 

default destination folder (i.e., C:\Program Files\OTCnet_olb).

• Select Cancel to exit the setup. 

• Select Back to return to the previous dialog box.

6. The Start Installation dialog box appears. Select Next.

7. The Server Port Settings dialog box appears. Select Next. Wait a moment while the files 

install.

• It is recommended that you install the OLB application with the default list of fixed 

ports. 

• If your agency has different server port settings or needs, contact Customer Support. 

8. Once the OTCnet OLB has been successfully installed message appears, select Finish.

• The OLB Installer verifies that Java is installed on the workstation.

• If Java is not installed, you will receive a “Java X must be installed for the OLB to 

function. The JAVA_HOME environment variable must also be set pointing to the 

main Java installation folder” message as shown in Figure 2. A Windows 

Administrator must install Java.

• To upgrade your OLB version, you do not need to recreate or import your OLB 

credentials.

Application Tip

Additional Buttons

Application Tip

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 2. Java message

9. The OTCnet OLB start and stop icons appear on the desktop of the workstation as shown in 

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Start and Stop OTCnet Local Bridge icons
No. 51991.

#### Jas. M. McCunn & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 120180-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited'it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it pertains to the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed, is subject to an allowance in duties and internal revenue taxes. The protests were sustained to this extent.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/18/21
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *



In connection with the quarterly report of Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George F. Horner III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2005 |  | /s/ GEORGE F. HORNER III             
|                     |  | George F. Horner III                 
|                     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



This certification
accompanies this quarterly report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

JOSE ISRAEL MANZO-FLORES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-30255

D.C. No. 2:12-cr-06004-LRS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Lonny R. Suko, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 21, 2014** 

Before: CANBY, SILVERMAN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Jose Israel Manzo-Flores appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

being an alien found in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Manzo-Flores’s

FILED

JAN 27 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Manzo-Flores the

opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed. 

Manzo-Flores has waived his right to appeal his sentence. Our independent

review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses

no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582

F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at

988. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.

2 12-30255
Order entered February 19, 2020

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 01205
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF E . H., A MINOR CHILD On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Cour t

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 18
- 18908



### O RDER The reporter’s record in this appeal has not been filed. By postcard dated December 30, 2019, we directed Janet Saavedra, Official Court Reporter for the 254 th Judicial District Court, to
fi le, within thirty days, the reporter’s record or written verification no hearings were recorded or appellant had not requested the reporter’s record. To date, Ms. Saavedra has not complied. Accordingly, we ORDER Ms. Saavedra to file, no later than March 10, 2020, either the reporter’s record or requested verification.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Saavedra and the parties.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
<PAGE>
 
23.  Consent of Independent Auditors.

                 EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Number
33-40233 and Registration Statement Number 33-37076 on Form S-3; Registration
Statement Number 33-49968 on Form S-4; Post-effective Amendment Number 1 to
Registration Statement Number 2-95076, 33-19308, 33-58414 and 33-00713 on Form
S-8 of Jostens, Inc. of our report dated January 28, 1997 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Jostens Inc. and subsidiaries
included in this Transition Report (Form 10-K) for the six month transition
period ended December 28, 1996.


                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 26, 1997
Denise Kane .' •. whQfiW,[QC' 

237 Regent Street :; - PL:;! JIU io 

Lansing, Ml 48912 

Februarys, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket No. FAA-2012-0089 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SA 

West Building Grand Floor, Room W-120140 

Washington, DC 20590 

To whom it may concern: 

I am writing to express my support for the current daily non-stop flight that is 

currently running between Lansing, Michigan to Washington D.C. 

My family members and I have used this route several times, recently while it has 

been operated by SunCountry and in the past when it was operated by Midwest 

Airlines. 

We have used this flight both for tourism and for work commitments. The 

alternative to using this flight is to spend a half a day or more traveling each way -

either by traveling to the Detroit airport or flying from Grand Rapids and having to 

stop one or two times on the way to Washington D.C. Either of these alternatives 

add approximately one day of travel to the trip and make it impossible or inefficient 

to travel for a short time - say for a three-day weekend. 

I would ask you to consider keeping this convenient flight in place for the residents 

of Lansing and mid-Michigan. 

Thank you for your time. 

Sincerely, 

Denise Kane
15.01 Confirm a Deposit
No. 49122.

#### Protests 5007-K, etc., of Choungo Tea Garden et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 58961.

protest 244628-K (New York).

#### Metallurg, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

'From an examination of the papers in the case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
List of Certified Reinsurance Companies

July 1, 2023

Odyssey Reinsurance Company 

(NAIC #23680)

BUSINESS ADDRESS: 300 FIRST STAMFORD PLACE, STAMFORD, CT 06902

PHONE: (203) 977-8000

UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $368,791,000

SURETY LICENSES c,f/: 

INCORPORATED IN: Connecticut

Phoenix Insurance Company (The) 

(NAIC #25623)

BUSINESS ADDRESS: ONE TOWER SQUARE, HARTFORD, CT 06183

PHONE: (860) 277-0111

UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $129,687,000

SURETY LICENSES c,f/: 

INCORPORATED IN: Connecticut

RENAISSANCE REINSURANCE U.S. INC. 

(NAIC #10357)

BUSINESS ADDRESS: 140 Broadway, Suite 4200, New York, NY 10005

PHONE: (212) 238-9600

UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $107,804,000

SURETY LICENSES c,f/: 

INCORPORATED IN: Maryland

ST. PAUL PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY 

(NAIC #19224)

BUSINESS ADDRESS: ONE TOWER SQUARE, HARTFORD, CT 06183
PHONE: (860) 277-0111

UNDERWRITING LIMITATION b/: $22,066,000

SURETY LICENSES c,f/: 

INCORPORATED IN: Connecticut
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Steven
J. Cohen, the principal executive officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.           The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based upon such evaluation; and





(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants' fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;





5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:





(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Dated:  August
      19, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Steven
      J.
      CohenSteven
      J. CohenPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DONNA ANDREW : CIVIL ACTION

vs. : NO. 02-4478 

FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. :

RULE 16 CONFERENCE 

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16, a conference will held before the

Honorable Petrese B. Tucker on February 19, 2004, at 9:00 a.m. in Room 9613, United States

Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Attached is a Rule 16 Conference Information Report which you are required to complete

and forward to the court at least three (3) days prior to the conference. This report does not have to

be officially filed of record.

Counsel must be prepared to address all relevant issues including, but not limited to, the

following matters:

(a) Jurisdictional defects, if any;

(b) Time limits for the possible joinder of additional parties and to amend pleadings;

(c) Prospects of amicable settlement;

(d) Progress of Initial Disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure;

(e) Establishing schedules for the remaining pretrial proceedings including 

discovery, pretrial filings, the exchange of expert reports, etc.;

(f) Filing of dispositive motions;

(g) Setting a firm date for trial.

If trial counsel in this case is on trial in a Court of record at the time of the Rule 16

Conference, another attorney in such trial attorney’s office, who should be familiar with the case,

is required to appear at the Rule 16 Conference. The Rule 16 Conference will be continued to

another date only in exceptional cases.

Encl.

cc: R. Teitell

 H. Holloway 

 J. Bachrach Alisa Ross

Deputy Clerk to Judge Petrese B. Tucker

(267) 299-7619

Date issued: January 27, 2004

Case 2:02-cv-04478-PBT Document 11 Filed 01/29/2004 Page 1 of 1
# Sum of Change -Bulletin 2014-XX

# Additional Information
No. 58959.

protest 243779-K (New York).

#### W. R. Grace & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The collector’s memorandum states that the surveyor’s reply attached to the invoice showing a net weight for duty and tax purposes to be 802,455 pounds, the collector would not object to a stipulation giving effect to that weight. The said surveyor's reply states that “it is the opinion of this office that liquidation of Entry No. 778073 was incorrectly returned. Re-liquidation is recommended accordingly.’’ However, since these documents were not offered or received in evidence, it was held that they cannot be considered as proof of the matters contained therein, and the court was constrained to overrule the protest. *W. T. Grant Company*v. *United States*(38 C. C. P. A. 57, C. A. D. 440); *Swift & Company*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655); and *United States*v. *Western Electric Company*(26 Cust. Ct. 531, Reap. Dec. 7954) followed.
No. 54635.

#### De Spirt Mosaic & Marble Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 138375-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of travertine stone similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 53963, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4024 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enable secure and 

trustworthy technology through other transaction contracting authority. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to enable 

secure and trustworthy technology through other transaction contracting authority. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Better Enabling Se5 cure and Trustworthy Technology for the Homeland Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘BEST Technology for the Homeland Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4024 IS

1 SEC. 2. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACQUISITION 

2 PILOT PROGRAM EXTENSION. 

3 Section 831 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 

4 (6 U.S.C. 391) is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding 

6 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2024’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2031’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (c)(1), in the matter preceding 

9 subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘September 30, 

10 2024’’ and inserting ‘‘September 30, 2031’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS