alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3908 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3908

 To restrict United States voluntary and assessed contributions to the 
                United Nations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 12, 2024

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To restrict United States voluntary and assessed contributions to the 
                United Nations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Funding Global Terrorists Act 
of 2024''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON FUNDING FOR UNITED NATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The United States may not make any voluntary or 
assessed contributions to the United Nations for assistance in 
Afghanistan until the Secretary of State certifies to the appropriate 
congressional committees that--
            (1) no United States funds are used in cash shipments by 
        the United Nations into Afghanistan; and
            (2) no specially designated global terrorist organization 
        receives funds as a result of such cash shipments.
    (b) Revocation.--If, after making a certification pursuant to 
subsection (a), the Secretary determines that such certification is 
inaccurate, the Secretary shall--
            (1) revoke such certification; and
            (2) provide to the appropriate congressional committees--
                    (A) a notification of such revocation; and
                    (B) a detailed justification for such revocation.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Appropriate congressional committees.--The term 
        ``appropriate congressional committees'' means--
                    (A) Committee on Foreign Relations and the 
                Committee on Appropriations of the Senate; and
                    (B) Committee on Foreign Affairs and the Committee 
                on Appropriations of the House of Representatives.
            (2) Specially designated global terrorist organization.--
        The term ``specially designated global terrorist organization'' 
        means an organization that has been designated as a specially 
        designated global terrorist pursuant to Executive Order 13224 
        (50 U.S.C. 1701 note; relating to blocking property and 
        prohibiting transactions with persons who commit, threaten to 
        commit, or support terrorism).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-41103

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BENIGNO AYALA-JUAREZ, also known as Benigno Juarez-Ayalanull also

known as Benigno Juarez Ayala,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:11-CR-330-1

Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Benigno Ayala-Juarez (Ayala) appeals the sentence he received after he

pleaded guilty to possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and to possession

of ammunition by a convicted felon. Each count charged a violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g)(1). Ayala argues that under United States v. Berry, 977 F.2d 915,

919-20 (5th Cir. 1992), his conviction and sentence on one of his counts must be

vacated because his two convictions and sentences are multiplicitous and violate

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 2, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-41103 Document: 00511907088 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/02/2012
No. 11-41103

the Double Jeopardy Clause. The government agrees and has filed an

Unopposed Motion for Summary Remand in lieu of Filing Appellee’s Brief. 

The government’s motion is GRANTED. Ayala’s sentences are VACATED,

and the case is REMANDED for dismissal of the multiplicitous count and for

resentencing on the count selected by the government. See Berry, 977 F.2d at

919-20; United States v. Osunegbu, 822 F.2d 472, 481 (5th Cir. 1987).

2

Case: 11-41103 Document: 00511907088 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/02/2012
~4/28/2012 08:51 FAX 2024935142 FAA + OMS ~001/003 

u.s. DEPAaTMENT OF TRANSPORTATI~ECEIVED FEDERAL AVI~TION ADMINlSTRATI~ 

FBDERAL AVIATION 

ADMINJSTAATION 

APR 2 0 2012 

HEARING DOCKET 

v. 

BRIAN WA.LLAESA. 

Comp laina n L., 

Respondent 

Dock~t No. CP10WP0010 

Before: Judge ~oder 

Hearing: May 22, 2012 

Comp~ainant's Notice o£ Depos.ition 

Pursuant to section 13.220(j) of the Rules of Practics 

jn FAA Civil Penalty Actions, 14 C.F'.R. § l3.220(j), 

counsel fo.r:· Complc:tinant will take t.he deposition of 

Jaime '1'omchik, P.o. Box 72088, Baltimore, MD 21237, 

Ms. Tomchik has advised that she will be out of state from 

May 16 through May 24. due to proviously scheduled travel 

plans and therefore cannot appea~ at the he~ring as it is 

cur~ently scheduled. The deposition will serve as an 

evidentiary deposition and will be both video recorded and 

tran:scribcd. 

Ms. Tomchik is expected to testify about Respondent's 

interactions with her on the flight and the crew's efforts 

to keep Respondent away from her during the flight. 

The depositi()n wilJ. be taken before a person duly 

qua J i.fied to administer the oath, at 1.37 8 Cape St. Claire I 

a 

0 
04/28/2012 08:51 FAX 2024835142 FAA + OMS 

Road, Annapolis, Maryland 21409; telephone: (410) 626-8973. 

The deposition will commence at 2;00 p.m. on 

April 30, 2012. 

Dated: April 16, 2012 

Respectfully submitted, 

Federal AviaLion ll.dmin'i.stration 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

BOO Independence Avenue, SN 

Washington, D.c. 20591 

Tel: (202) 2 67-9958 

FAX: (202) 267-5106 

@ 002/003 

2 
04/28/2012 08~51 FAX 2024935142 FAA -> OMS 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that i have sent by certified mail, 

return receipt requested, an original.and one copy of the 

foregoing Complainant's Nobce of Deposition in 

FAA v. BL·ian Wallaesa, FAA Docket No. CP10WP0010; FDMS No. 

FAA-2010-0628, addressed to: 

E'ederal 1\viation Administration 

800 Independence Av~, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Att~ntion: H~aring Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

In addition, I hereby certify that I have sent.by 

certified mail, return receipt requested one copy of the 

foregoing document, uddressed to: 

BriDn Wa11aesa, Respondent 

1127/. Wortham Crest Circle 

Manassas, VA 20109 

Jaime Tomchik 

P.O. Box 72088 

Daltimore,.MD 21237 

The Hon. Ronnie A. Yoder 

ChJ.ef Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E, 

Wa~hington, DC 20590 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

t r•(J• ' .) , .. ,, -~·-r 

·1.) I .•.:Yi ~ --'1'-" . .)'-"(_=-=( .._··_,_\.~:...._, -----

Dated: April 16, 2012 

Iii 003/003 

3
EXHIBIT 23


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-43625, 33-36707, 333-62905, 333-86829), Form
S-8 (Nos. 33-19425, 33-25872, 33-65230, 33-48818, 33-56061, 33-62367, 33-59139,
333-16037, 333-44517, 333-68153, 333-83365, 333-95727), and Form S-4 (Nos.
33-58573, 33-58933, 333-42247, 333-82433) of Fleet Boston Corporation of our
report dated January 19, 2000 relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 9, 2000
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT F

Edit

No

Prior 

Year 

USSGL 

Account

Beginning

Ending 

Balance 

Indicator

Authority

Type Code

TAS 

Status

Reporting

Type Code

TAS Status 

Transitioning 

Code

417000 E D/P/S 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Closing Edits Detail Report

Bulletin No. 2018-04 DRAFT VII CER - 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 14

- 00361

- CV

In re Robert Galvin

T. L., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, NO. D

- 1

- FM

- 13

- 002211, THE HONORABLE SCOTT H. J ENKINS, JUDGE PRESID ING

O R D E R T O S H O W C A U S E

PER CURIAM

This is a contempt proceeding ancillary to the appeal of T. L . The subject of this

proceeding is Robert Galvin , appellant’s attorney.

Appellant filed her notice of appeal on June 4, 2014 , and h er brief was due July

14, 2014 . On July 21, 2014, we ordered counsel to file appellant’s brief no later than August 5,

2014 . To date, appellant’s brief has not been filed.

Therefore, it is hereby ordered that Ro bert Galvin shall appear in person before

this Court on Thursday , August 28 , 2014 , at 1:30 p.m. , in the Third Court of Appeals

courtroom, located on the first floor of the Price Daniel, Sr. Building, 209 West 14th Street, in

Austin, Travis County, Texas, t o show cause why he should not be held in contempt and havesanctions imposed for his failure to obey our July 21, 2014 order. This order to show cause will

be withdrawn and Galvin will be relieved of his obligation to appear before this Court as ordered

above if the Clerk of this Court receives appellant’s brief on or before August 2 6 , 2014

.

It is ordered on August 12 , 2014.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Field
No. 67798.

#### Ace Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/21146, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bicycle horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *G. Joannou Cycle Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 172, C.D. 2253), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1834 Prepped byKeeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 40 ) IV-E-13 Docket Number: 

# A-90-07

Printed 11/10/20082:14:35PM

Sheet 40of 61P. 2 £> UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO N AGENC YT\Tj - £" - 1 3 AN N ARBOR . MICHIGA N 4810 5

MEMORANDUM OFFIC E O F AI R AN O RADIATIO N 

## 27

## 199 4|ID ! 

## J 1 MA Y

## 2 6199 4

SUBJECT :
FROM : Meetin g o nApri l 21 , 199 4 wit hth e Chemica l Manufacturer s

Associatio n(CMA ) regardin g th e Fuel s an d Fue l Additive s (F/FA ) Registratio n (Healt hEffect s Testing ) Progra m



# U ^ Judit hGray , Senio r Projec t Manage r i Specia l Regulator yProject s Bran c TO : Docke t A-90-0 7 Attendin g th e meetin g wer e th e following : Fro mCMA : Charle s Keller , Ma xMason , Nei l Kin g Fro m EPA/OMS : Richar d Wilson , Cheste r France , Car l Fulper , Davi d Kortum , Ine s Figueroa , Rober t Johnson , Judit hGra y Fro m EPA/OGC : Lori e Schmidt , Mar yElle nLevin e CM Arepresentative s me t wit hEP Aofficial s a t CMA' s reques t t o discus s th e F/F Atestin g rule . CMArepresentative s aske d a numbe r o f ver yspecifi c question s abou t th e inten t o f th e propose d rul e a s describe d i n th e Notic e o f Reopenin g o f th e Commen t Perio d (5 9 F R 8886 ) . Th e question s particularl yaddresse d th e detail s o f wha t F/F Aproduct s EP Aintende d t o cove r a s "registrable " an d ho wfue l additive s woul d b e tested , unde r th e propose d rule . CMA representative s furthe r reiterate d a numbe r o f point s i nthei r previou s writte ncomments , includin g thei r argument s agains t a n Alternativ e Tie r 2 provision , EPA' s propose d definitio no f baselin e diese l and , i nparticular , th e impossibilit yo f completin g Tie r 3 testin g withi n th e thre e yea r perio d prescribe d i nth e proposals .
07.01
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of The United States Code**

 

I, Harry J. Mullany III, the Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 
|   | /s/   Harry J. Mullany III |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   | Harry   J. Mullany III     |
|   | May 16,   2011        |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FILED WITH THE COMPANY'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 ANNUAL REPORT
ON FORM 10-KSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             122
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   122
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,569
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       124,867
<OTHER-SE>                                   (137,290)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,569
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (45,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (45,534)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     405
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (45,129)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

October 28, 1954

No. 58444.

protests 202406-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Draper & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable *395at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content Under T. D. 53159” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
----

Order of the Court of First Instance of 24 July 2006 — AITEC and Others v Commission

(Case T -371/05) (1)

(2006/C 237/25)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

----

(1)OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.

----
09.07
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000050217
<NAME> INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    1,787,969
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      5,799
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         108,492
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       150,140
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,052,400
<COMMON>                                       324,537
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            456,349
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 782,249
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     51,898
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           627,791
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              34,000
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   11,250
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 545,212
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                2,052,400
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      762,503
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            68,248
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     531,036
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     599,284
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        163,219
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               4,422
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 167,641
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        45,053
<NET-INCOME>                                   122,588
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      3,182
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  119,406
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        83,630
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       43,425
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         254,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

### OCT 

### 1 0 2014

MEMORANDUM OFFICE OF WATER

SUBJECT: " Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 4

- Draft"- Executive Order 12866 Docketing Requirements Compliance SAN 4745; (RIN : 2040- A537) FROM : Meredith Russell , CCL 4 Team Lead

### rr~ 

## d 

# .t**Tuvy~** Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water TO: Docket: EPA- HQ-OW

-2012-0027 OVERVIEW The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) requires the U
. S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to publish a list of currently unregulated contaminants that are known or anticipated to occur in public water systems and which may require regulation. The EPA must publish the Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) every five years . The EPA last published a CCL (CCL 3) on Octo ber 8, 2009. After publication ofthe CCL, SDWA requires the EPA to determine whether or not to regulate at least 5 contaminants from the most current CCL. Thi s a separate process called regulatory determinations. The purpose ofthis action is to:
• present the EPA's CCL (CCL 4), • describe the agency's approach for identifying contaminants on the Draft CCL 4, and • request comments on the Draft CCL 4 and on ways the agency can improve or refine the CCL process for future CCLs
. This Draft CCL 4 includes 100 chemicals or chemical groups and 12 microbes. The list includes chemicals used in commerce, pesticides, biological toxins, disinfection byproducts and waterborne pathogens. The EPA conducted an abbreviated evaluation and selection process for CCL 4. This abbreviated CCL 4 process includes a three pronged approach: (1) carrying forward CCL 3 contaminants (minus those with regulatory determinations), (2) seeking and evaluating nominations from the public for additional contaminants to consider, and (3) evaluating any new data for those contaminants with previous negative regulatory determinations from CCL 1 or CCL 2 for potential inclusion on the CCL 4. 

### 1 I n ternet Add ress (URL) • http ://www

. epa .g ov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetab l e O i l Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlori ne Free Recyc l ed Pape rOMB Transaction The Office of Management and Budget review ofthe Federal Register notice : " Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List 4-Draft" was initiated on May 17 , 2014. OMB requested only minor editorial and clarifying changes. OMB concluded its review on August 27, 2014, with a designation of"consistent with changes
.''

2