alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. P68/271.

protests 63/8194 and 63/9617 (Los Angeles).

#### Air Sea Forwarders and Wholesale Business Machines *v.*United States,

*1050Foed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of calculating machines similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Air-Sea Forwarders, Wholesale Business Machines*(54 CCPA 67, C.A.D. 907), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Banknote Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the year ended December 31,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Steven G. Singer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



                                               /s/ Steven G. Singer
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Steven G. Singer
                                               Chairman and
                                               Chief Executive Officer

Date: April 29, 2005
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Install the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB) Application

To install the OLB application, complete the following steps:

1. Locate the folder on the workstation where the OLB zip file resides, e.g., your Downloads 

folder. Double click the zip file. Double-click the EXE file as shown in Figure 1 to start the 

installation. 

The EXE must be launched and executed by a Windows Administrator.

Figure 1. OTCnet Local Bridge

2. The Welcome to the OTCnet OLB Setup program dialog box appears. Select Next.

• Select Cancel to cancel and exit the setup.

3. The Destination Location dialog box appears. Select Next.

• It is recommended that you install the OLB application into the default destination 

folder (i.e., C:\Program Files\OTCnet_ olb). 

• Select Cancel to cancel and exit the setup.

• Select Back to return to the previous dialog box.

4. The Start Installation dialog box appears. Select Next. 

5. The Server Port Settings dialog box appears. Select Next. Wait a moment while the files 

install.

Application Tip

Application Tip

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• It is recommended that you install the OLB application with the default list of fixed 

ports. 

• If your agency has different server port settings or needs, contact Customer Support.

6. Once the OTCnet Local Bridge has been successfully installed message appears, select 

Finish. 

• The OLB Installer verifies that Java is installed on the workstation.

• If Java is not installed, you will receive a “Java X must be installed for the OLB to 

function. The JAVA_HOME environment variable must also be set pointing to the 

main Java installation folder” message as shown in Figure 2. A Windows 

Administrator must install Java.

Figure 2. Java message

7. The OTCnet OLB start and stop icons appear on the workstation desktop as shown in 

Figure 3.

Application Tips

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

3

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 3. Start and Stop OTCnet Local Bridge icons
Order entered June 9, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00619
- CV
DENNIS JAMES POLEDOR E, JR., Appellant
V. CHERI YLONDA POLEDOR E, Appellee On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 14
- 13701 

### O RDER Appellant, an inmate appearing pro se, has filed a motion to suspend rule 9.3(a) which requires a party filing any document in paper form to file also one unbound copy of the document. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.3(a). Pursuant to rule 2, w e GRANT the May 27, 2015 motion and DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to accept the original of any document filed by appellant even if not accompanied by the required unbound copy. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 2.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUS TICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

DAVID FORREST, et al. : NO. 02-4435

__________________________________________________________

MARTIN FINK, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

 :

 v. :

 :

NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE :

COMPANY, et al. : NO. 04-5370

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2005, it is Ordered

that a FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE will be held on Monday,

September 12, 2005 at 4:00 p.m.. A Civil Jury Trial will be held

on Wednesday, September 14, 2005 at 10:00 a.m., in courtroom 7-B

on the 7th floor of the U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market St.,

Philadelphia, PA.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

S/Marie O’Donnell

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies via ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on ____________ to:

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 148 Filed 06/20/2005 Page 1 of 1
No. 54009.

#### Boston Brokerage Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 731246-G, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
1 

United States v. Moussaoui: 

Thank-You Letter to Anonymous Jurors 

Hon. Leonie M. Brinkema

Eastern District of Virginia 

May 3, 2006 

The following letter was sent by the Eastern District of Virginia’s United States 

District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema to jurors who served anonymously in the 

prosecution of an alleged conspirator with perpetrators of the September 11, 

2001, attacks on New York and Washington, in United States v. Moussaoui, No. 

1:01-cr-455 (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2001). 

Thank-You Letter 

Re: United States v. Moussaoui, 1:01-cr-455 

Dear Juror #_____: 

On behalf of the court, I want to thank and commend you for your outstanding public service as a juror in this very difficult case. [You and the other alternate jurors deserve special recognition because you remained fully attentive 

throughout this trial even though you knew that you might never be called upon 

to participate in the final sentencing decision. As I said many times in open court, 

you were necessary to insure that this case would not have to be retried if one of 

the deliberating jurors became ill.] The jury has reached its decision and this case 

is finally over. Therefore, you may go back to your regular routine, including 

watching news broadcasts about the case. 

Although the attorneys are prohibited from trying to communicate with you, 

members of the media or the public may eventually try to communicate with you 

about the case. You are free to speak with them if you wish; however, you may 

not disclose the identity of any of the other sixteen jurors, the contents of any 

classified information shown only to the jurors, or any confidential discussions 

the jurors may have had among themselves. You also have a right to refuse to 

communicate with anyone about the case and your experiences as a juror. If you 

exercise that right and believe that your wishes are not being respected, you may 

call the United States Marshals Service at _____ or me at _____ for assistance. 

You should feel a great sense of accomplishment in knowing that you were 

asked to make a sacrifice for your country and that you responded to that call. 

Our legal system would collapse if we did not have citizens like you who are 

willing to put aside their normal routine and spend days in a courtroom, sometimes to be exposed to some very terrible sights and sounds, and then being 

called upon to judge another human. Your outstanding service on the jury is clear 

proof of the willingness of Americans to serve their nation, and of the strength of 

our legal system. 
United States v. Moussaoui: Thank-You Letter to Anonymous Jurors 

2 

Once again, thank you for your service. 

Sincerely, 

Leonie M. Brinkema 

United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32(i)


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Local Telecom Systems, Inc. (the
"Company") on form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William R. Miertschin, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Okley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.


/s/ William R. Miertschin
--------------------------
William R. Miertschin
Chief Executive Officer

Date:   February 16, 2005
        ---------------
Page 1 of 2 IRC Handout 11/29/2023

FY 2023/24 Scenario Updates

Scenario Date originally 

published

Tentative release 

date of draft 

version

Status Update

Appropriation Transfers

(Previous Name)

Non-Expenditure Transfers 

(New Name)

1997 January 2024 Fiscal Service and OMB have been having 

regular meetings. When finalized this will 

be a 7-part scenario with several 

subsections. Parts I through III are

complete, as IRC has reviewed and GLAB 

has taken comments and updated as 

necessary. Parts IV (A&B) and V (A,B,&C) 

will be sent out for review in the near 

future.

Transfer of Prior Year 

Balances

2000 N/A Assigned but work has not yet begun.

Congressional Deferral 2004 N/A Assigned but work has not yet begun.

Leases – RTU (Budgetary 

Capital)

2002 based on 

SFFAS 5/6, 2023 

based on SFFAS 

54

4/13/23

12/14/23 (revised 

version)

Minor cleanup – No changes to the actual 

USSGL’s/posting logic. Clerical changes, 

such as labeling of transactions, will be 

made. Also a few new transactions will be 

published in the USSGL supplement and the 

tc # will be added to the scenario.

Leases – RTU (Budgetary 

Operating no cancellation)

2002 based on 

SFFAS 5/6, 2023 

based on SFFAS 

54

4/13/23

12/14/23 (revised 

version)

Minor cleanup – No changes to the actual 

USSGL’s/posting logic. Clerical changes, 

such as labeling of transactions, will be 

made. Also a few new transactions will be 

published in the USSGL supplement and the 

tc # will be added to the scenario.

Leases – RTU (Budgetary 

Operating with 

cancellation)

2002 based on 

SFFAS 5/6, 2023 

based on SFFAS 

54

4/13/23

12/14/23 (revised 

version)

Minor cleanup – No changes to the actual 

USSGL’s/posting logic. Clerical changes, 

such as labeling of transactions, will be 

made. Also a few new transactions will be 

published in the USSGL supplement and the 

tc # will be added to the scenario.

Foreign Military Sales N/A N/A GLAB has worked extensively with DoD to 

assist in formulating the FMS Scenario. 

There are several outstanding questions 

regarding FHOT/CIHO. GLAB, OMB, DoD, 

and several other branches at Fiscal 

continue to meet and discuss remaining

topics

Year-End Accrual Scenario N/A March 2024 Research, development, and analysis has 

begun.

Transfers – Foreign 

Assistance Act

N/A March 2024 Research, development, and analysis has 

begun.

Rescissions/Reductions 

Scenario

Various scenarios 

exist currently. 

May 2024 Research, development, and analysis has 

begun.
Page 2 of 2 IRC Handout 11/29/2023

Rollover of the TFM & GTAS Timeline

• 11/29/2023 – FY 2023 GTAS Material Difference Reporting (MDR) Window closes.

• 11/30/2023 – GTAS system rollover (Part I will now be FY 2024 & Part II will not be FY 2025) 

• 12/6/2023 – GTAS reporting window for November opens.

• 12/14/2023 – TFM Bulletin Publish – Bulletin # 2024-01. 

• Final FY 2023 crosswalks: The U.S. Standard General Ledger - Archives - Treasury Financial 

Manual
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3938 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3938

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, as the ``Private First Class 
                      Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PRIVATE FIRST CLASS DESMOND T. DOSS VA CLINIC 
              IN LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.-- The community-based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, shall after the 
date of the enactment of this Act be known and designated as the 
``Private First Class Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic''.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the clinic 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to 
the Private First Class Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic.

            Passed the Senate August 1, 2024.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3938

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
 Veterans Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, as the ``Private First Class 
                      Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic''.
```
No. 50941.

#### Protest 80303-K of Wing Woh Chong Hing Kee Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial a Government chemist testified that he had analyzed a sample of the merchandise and found it to consist entirely of synthetic phenolic resin with a little pigment, and that the synthetic resin did not serve as a binding agent. The case was submitted, plaintiff citing Abstract 50190. Upon the record presented and following the authority cited the chopsticks in question were held properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

Nos. 19-1300

 19-1298

 19-1296

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee,

v.

DAVID JOEL VÉLEZ-ANDINO,

Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this court issued on August 30, 2021, is 

corrected as follows:

On page 14, line 16, remove "There" and add the 

following: "A finding of unreasonableness would, of course, 

comprise such an extraordinary circumstance, see United States v. 

Battle, 637 F.3d 44, 51-52 (1st Cir. 2011), but the refusal to 

depart in this case was far from unreasonable. Simply put, there 

. . . "
No. 55904.

protest 163388-K (Seattle).

#### Marie Wendel *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The record disclosed that the entry was liquidated on November 8, 1948, and that the protest was filed on September 7, 1949. Inasmuch as section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, provides that a protest may be filed against the liquidation of a collector “within sixty days after, but not before such liquidation,” it was held that the protest herein was not filed in accordance with law. The protest was therefore dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FRANK VALENZUELA, JR.,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0900 FCD DAD P

vs.

C. SMITH, M.D., et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested an extension of time to file opposition to defendants’

motion for summary judgment. Defendants have filed a statement of non-opposition to the

request. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s August 9, 2005 application for enlargement of time is granted;

2. Plaintiff is granted an extension of time to September 1, 2005, in which to file

and serve opposition to defendants’ July 18, 2005 motion for summary judgment; and

3. Any reply shall be filed and served in accordance with Local Rule 78-230(m).

DATED: August 15, 2005.

DAD:13:bb

vale0900.36opp

Case 2:04-cv-00900-FCD-DAD Document 44 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 1
# sec6_rsonp_2019

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-06	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSOCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2019
# Part 2	Fiscal Year 2019 Reporting

**SUPPLEMENT	Section III**

**U.S. Standard General Ledger Account Transaction Categories**

**TRANSACTION**

**CODETRANSACTION DESCRIPTION**

# A. Funding

100 - 399	Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections 400 - 699	Authority Transfers

700 - 799	Reimbursables and Other Income

# B. Disbursements and Payables

E. **Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections**

100 - 399	Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499	Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above 500 - 799	Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

# F. Yearend

100 - 299	Preclosing Entries

300 - 499	Closing Entries

# G. Memorandum Entries

100 - 299	All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

# H. Other Specialized Transaction Entries

100 - 799	Other

# Bulletin No. 2018-05	III AC - 1	June 2018
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10- Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas L. Carter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Thomas L. Carter

Thomas L. Carter
Chief Financial Officer
May 6, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and will be retained by
Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 59517.

protests 202267-K, etc. (Cleveland).

#### The A. W. Fenton Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# sec5_sf133_sch

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10March 2018
No. 52231.

protests 61184-K, etc. (New York).

#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4113 

To allow States to require payment of State fees related to boating as 

a condition for issuance of a vessel number and to collect such fees 

in conjunction with other fees related to vessel numbering. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 11 (legislative day, APRIL 10), 2024 

Mrs. SHAHEEN (for herself, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To allow States to require payment of State fees related 

to boating as a condition for issuance of a vessel number 

and to collect such fees in conjunction with other fees 

related to vessel numbering. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘State Boating Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. COLLECTION OF STATE FEES RELATED TO BOAT6 ING. 

7 Section 12307 of title 46, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4113 IS

1 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘The authority’’ and in3 serting ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The authority’’; 

4 and 

5 (B) by striking ‘‘that are—’’ and inserting 

6 ‘‘that—’’; 

7 (2) in paragraph (1)— 

8 (A) by inserting ‘‘are’’ before ‘‘prescribed’’; 

9 and 

10 (B) by striking ‘‘; or’’ and inserting a 

11 semicolon; 

12 (3) in paragraph (2)— 

13 (A) by inserting ‘‘are’’ before ‘‘related’’; 

14 and 

15 (B) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘; 

16 or’’; and 

17 (4) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(3) require the payment of State fees related 

19 to boating, which may include fees for search and 

20 rescue operations, boating safety measures, or ef21 forts to address aquatic invasive species. 

22 ‘‘(b) STATE FEES RELATED TO BOATING.—A State 

23 issuing authority may collect a fee described in subsection 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4113 IS

1 (a)(3) in conjunction with the collection of any other fee 

2 established under this section.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0616

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY THOMAS DISHON,

Defendant and Appellant. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including November 14, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 6 2022

10/06/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0616