alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To:

Cc:

Bcc:

Subject: Gent - repsonse to request for PM2.5 descriptive statistics

To: Beth Hassett-Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Gent, Janneane" <janneane.gent@yale.edu>

Date: 10/21/2009 04:23PM

Subject: repsonse to request for PM2.5 descriptive statistics

Please see attached memo. 

Janneane F. Gent, Ph.D. 

Research Scientist 

Yale University 

Center for Perinatal, Pediatric and 

Environmental Epidemiology 

One Church Street , 6th Floor 

New Haven , Connecticut 06510 
October 21, 2009 

TO: Beth M. Hassett-Sipple, Environmental Health Scientist Ambient Standards Group 

FROM: Janneane F. Gent, Yale University 

RE: Request for PM2.5 descriptive statistics 

1. Table 1 shows descriptive statistics from the PM2.5 data used in Gent J. F., Triche E.W., 

Holford T.R., Belanger K., Bracken M.B., Beckett W.S., Leaderer B.P. (2003). "Association of 

low-level ozone and fine particles with respiratory symptoms in children with asthma." JAMA 

290(14): 1859-67. 

Table 1. PM2.5 concentration (in μg/m3) in Southern New England, April 1 to September 30, 2001.

EPA Monitoring Sites

Statistic New Haven East Hartford Springfield Chicopee 4-site mean

Mean 15.99 12.17 12.58 10.74 13.10

Minimum 3.70 2.80 2.10 0.50 3.68

p95 36.93 30.90 26.79 25.35 30.71

p96 39.56 31.32 28.53 26.40 32.41

p97 40.21 31.87 29.54 30.83 32.74

p98 41.16 33.95 34.02 31.82 33.23

p99 43.98 37.58 35.74 34.00 37.64

Maximum 48.40 41.30 42.80 35.10 44.17

Notes. data from Gent et al JAMA 2003;290:1859-1867 

Location of sites: New Haven (09-009-0018 Stiles St.) 

 East Hartford (09-003-1003 McAuliffe Park) 

 Springfield (25-013-0016 Liberty Parking Lot) 

 Chicopee (25-013-0008 Anderson AFB) 

2. Table 2 shows descriptive statistics from PM2.5 data used in Gent J.F., Koutrakis P., Belanger 

K., Triche E., Holford T.R., Bracken M.B., Leaderer B.P. (2009). “Symptoms and medication 

use in children with asthma and traffic-related sources of fine particle pollution.” Environ. 

Health Perspec. 117(7):1168-1174. 

As described in the methods section, PM2.5 filter samples were collected between 1 August 2000 

and 3 February 2004 from the Stiles Street monitoring site in New Haven (98% of the filters 

used) or the State Street site in New Haven (2% of the filters). Table 2 shows descriptive 

statistics by year and for the entire period of the study. 

Table 2. PM2.5 concentration (in μg/m3

) from Stiles Street monitoring site in New Haven, CT. 

Measurements from 8/1/2000 through 2/3/2004.

Study Year

2001 2001 2002 2003 2004 2000 - 2004

Statistic 8/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 8/1/2000 - 2/3/2004

Mean 16.13 16.84 16.12 16.89 17.55 16.59

Minimum 3.60 0.50 0.30 3.40 11.00 0.30

p95 30.50 35.82 34.80 33.70 29.30 33.65

p96 31.06 36.86 36.00 36.80 30.10 35.76

p97 32.64 39.42 39.38 38.46 30.96 38.61

p98 33.03 40.26 41.78 42.00 32.28 40.87

p99 37.84 43.62 46.16 46.74 33.59 46.30

Maximum 40.30 58.20 83.40 58.60 34.90 83.40
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1634 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1634

   To require auto dealers to fix outstanding safety recalls before 
           selling or leasing a used passenger motor vehicle.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2017

 Mr. Blumenthal (for himself and Mr. Markey) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require auto dealers to fix outstanding safety recalls before 
           selling or leasing a used passenger motor vehicle.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Used Car Safety Recall Repair Act''.

SEC. 2. USED PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLE CONSUMER PROTECTION.

    Section 30120 of title 49, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(k) Limitation on Sale or Lease of Used Passenger Motor 
Vehicles.--(1) Except as provided under paragraphs (2) and (4), a 
dealer may not sell or lease a used passenger motor vehicle until after 
any defect or noncompliance determined under section 30118 with respect 
to the vehicle has been remedied.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply if--
            ``(A) the recall information regarding the used passenger 
        motor vehicle--
                    ``(i) was not available at the time of sale or 
                lease using the means established by the Secretary 
                under section 31301 of the Moving Ahead for Progress in 
                the 21st Century Act (49 U.S.C. 30166 note); and
                    ``(ii) was not available on the manufacturer's 
                website; or
            ``(B) notification of the defect or noncompliance is 
        required under section 30118(b), but enforcement of the order 
        is set aside in a civil action to which section 30121(d) 
        applies.
    ``(3) Notwithstanding section 30102(a)(1), in this subsection--
            ``(A) the term `dealer' means a person that has sold at 
        least 10 motor vehicles to one or more consumers during the 
        most recent 12-month period; and
            ``(B) the term `used passenger motor vehicle' means a motor 
        vehicle that has previously been purchased other than for 
        resale.
    ``(4) By rule, the Secretary may exempt the auctioning of a used 
passenger motor vehicle to dealers from the requirements under 
paragraph (1) if such exemption does not harm public safety.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on that date that is 18 months after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1468 

To require reports on civilian casualties in connection with United States 

military operations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2017 

Ms. WARREN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require reports on civilian casualties in connection with 

United States military operations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preventing Civilian 

5 Casualties in Military Operations Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ANNUAL REPORT ON CIVILIAN CASUALTIES IN CON7 NECTION WITH UNITED STATES MILITARY 

8 OPERATIONS. 

9 (a) ANNUAL REPORT REQUIRED.—Not later than 

10 May 1 each year, the Secretary of Defense shall submit 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1468 IS

1 to the congressional defense committees a report on civil2 ian casualties caused as a result of United States military 

3 operations during the preceding year. 

4 (b) ELEMENTS.—Each report under subsection (a) 

5 shall set forth the following: 

6 (1) A list of all the United States military oper7 ations during the year covered by such report that 

8 were confirmed to have resulted in civilian casual9 ties. 

10 (2) For each military operation listed pursuant 

11 to paragraph (1), the following: 

12 (A) The date. 

13 (B) The location. 

14 (C) The type of operation. 

15 (D) The confirmed number of civilian cas16 ualties. 

17 (c) FORM.—Each report under subsection (a) shall 

18 be submitted in unclassified form, but may include a clas19 sified annex. 

20 (d) SUNSET.—The requirement to submit a report 

21 under subsection (a) shall expire on the date that is five 

22 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

23 (e) CONGRESSIONAL DEFENSE COMMITTEES DE24 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘congressional defense 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1468 IS

1 committees’’ has the meaning given that term in section 

2 101(a)(16) of title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 64065.

protest 59/20208 (New York).

#### Horrockses (U.S.A.), Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KEITH STAFFORD, an individual, )

) 2:04-cv-0047-GEB-EFB

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER

v. )

)

UNITED TREASURES, INC., a ) 

Washington corporation, )

)

Defendant. )

)

The “Notice of Settlement” filed September 29, 2006, states

“the parties have agreed in writing to a complete and full settlement

of this case” and “will file a dismissal of all claims against one

another.” (Notice of Settlement at 1.) Therefore, trial scheduled to

commence October 3, 2006, is vacated and a dismissal document shall be

filed no later than October 19, 2006. See L.R. 16-160(b) (indicating

dismissal documents should be filed within twenty days from the date

on which a notice of settlement is filed). Failure to respond by this

deadline may be construed as consent to dismissal of this action

without prejudice, and a dismissal order could be filed. See id. (“A 

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00047-GEB-EFB Document 155 Filed 09/29/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

failure to file dispositional papers on the date prescribed by the

Court may be grounds for sanctions.”).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: September 29, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00047-GEB-EFB Document 155 Filed 09/29/06 Page 2 of 2
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 19, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00538

- CV

William Alec TISDALL, M.D. and William A. Tisdall, M.D., P.A. d/b/a Spine & Joint Pain Specialists

, Appellant s

v.

Thomas VAREBROOK and Rebecca Varebrook,

Appellee s

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

T rial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 06007 Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this appeal was originally due September 9, 2019; however, we granted the court reporter Amy L. Hinds , an extension of time until October 9, 2019 to file it. On October 11, 2019, Hinds filed a request for f urther extension of time, explaining she had been in

trial for four weeks. On October 18, 2019, we issued an order granting the motion in part and ordering Hinds to file the record by November 8, 2019. Our order advised Hinds that the court would not gra nt a further extension of time unless she filed a timely notification that “(1) establishes there are extraordinary circumstances that prevent her from timely filing the record, (2) provides the court a status report showing the parts of the record that h ave been completed and a

detailed breakdown of what remains to be done, and (3) provides the court reasonable assurance the record will be completed and filed by the requested extended deadline.” We further advised Hinds that is she were “unable to perf orm all her duties and complete the record in a timely manner, she must take whatever steps are necessary, including requesting a substitute reporter or hiring competent assistance, so that she may timely complete and file the record in this appeal.”

Hin ds did not file the record by November 8. However, on November 14, she filed another notification of late record, requesting an extension until December 16. The only reason stated for failing to file the record is “I am in trial again.” The notification d oes not satisfy any of the three requirements of our October 18, 2019 order, nor does it indicate that Hinds has requested a substitute reporter or hired assistance in order to timely prepare and file the record.We therefore hold the requested extensio n of time in abeyance. We order Hinds to file a

notification that complies with our October 18, 2019 order by 9:00 a.m. on November . If Hinds fails to comply with this order, the requested extension of time will be denied and Hinds may be ordered to appea r and show cause why she should not be held in civil or criminal contempt.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

I N WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 19th day of November, 2019

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 7, 2017

NO. 03-16-00254-CV

Michael Morath, in his Official Capacity as Texas Commissioner of Education; and 

Michael Berry, in his Official Capacity as Deputy Commissioner of Education, Appellant

v.

Progreso Independent School District, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND

REVERSED AND RENDERED—OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court on April 1, 2016. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was reversible error in the 

court’s order. Therefore, the Court reverses the district court’s order and renders judgment 

dismissing PISD’s claims. The appellee shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this 

Court and the court below.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4077 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.4077

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    180 Steuart Street in San Francisco, California, as the ``Dianne 
                        Feinstein Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DIANNE FEINSTEIN POST OFFICE.
    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 180 Steuart Street in San Francisco, California, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Dianne Feinstein Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Dianne 
Feinstein Post Office''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**EXHIBIT 21**

 

**EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY**

 

**LISTING OF THE COMPANY’S SUBSIDIARIES**

 
| **Name**                                                                                |   | **Nature of  Business** |   | **Date  Acquired  or Created** |   | **%****Owned** |   | **State/  Country of  Incorporation** |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|--------------------------------|--------|----------------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Earle M. Jorgensen (Canada) Inc. (formerly Kilsby  Jorgensen Steel & Aluminum Inc.) |   | Metal Distributor       |   | 11/13/90                       |   | 100            | %      | Canada                                |   |
| Stainless Insurance Ltd.                                                                |   | Captive Insurance       |   | 03/20/96                       |   | 100            | %      | Bermuda                               |   |

 

----
### Mineral Resources On-Line Spatial Data
Mineral Resources > Online Spatial Data > Geology > by state > Florida 

### Florida geology To zoom in, hold shift key and drag mo use; click a geologic unit for details

-82.47559, 30.48447 [ Geologic maps of this area, from the National Geologic Map Database catalog ] [ Legend for the lithology shown on the map ] Download data shown on the map above:
Choose format: 6 Google Earth Get Data City name: 6 begins with State: 6 Florida Search [ Specify coordinates? ] Map size: [ Small ] - [ Medium ] - [ Large ] 

### Pa g e 1 of 2 Florida g eolo gy

7/13/2011 htt p ://mrdata.us g s. g ov/s g mc/fl.htmlU.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey URL: http://mrdata.usgs.gov/sgmc/fl.html Page Contact Information: Peter Schweitzer Page Last Modified: Monday, 16-May-2011 16:37:26 EDT 

### Pa g e 2 of 2 Florida g eolo gy

7/13/2011 htt p ://mrdata.us g s. g ov/s g mc/fl.html
No. 60046.

#### K. Ginsburg, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 281665-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at *30*percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 51898), for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-0878-GEB-DAD-P

vs.

C/O KISSENGER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 13, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections

to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has included in his objections a request for

reconsideration of the separate order filed by the magistrate judge on July 13, 2006. 

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations to be supported by the

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 51 Filed 08/14/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

record and by proper analysis. Upon review of the file, the court also finds that the rulings

contained in the magistrate judge’s separate order filed July 13, 2006, are not clearly erroneous or

contrary to law. See Local Rule 72-303(f).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 13, 2006 (#45) are adopted in

full;

2. Plaintiff’s January 23, 2006 application for a temporary restraining order (#16)

is denied;

3. Plaintiff’s April 24, 2006 motion for appointment of three-judge panel (#26) is

denied; and

4. The rulings contained in the magistrate judge’s order filed July 13, 2006 (#44)

are affirmed.

Dated: August 11, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 51 Filed 08/14/06 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>




                                                          EXHIBIT 99.1 AND 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Family Room Entertainment Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  we,
George Furla,  Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Stanley Tepper,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                /s/  Michael Rudolph
                                -----------------------------
                                Michael Rudolph
                                Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
                                Accounting Officer
                                June 11, 2003




                                /s/  Stanley Tepper
                                ------------------------------
                                Stanley Tepper
                                Chief Financial Officer
                                June 11, 2003


                                       27
<PAGE>
No. 56380.

protests 545009-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### American Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
# Data

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"VII VSR - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2018
No. 53524.

protests 123300-K/738 and 123301-K/739 (Chicago).

#### Cribben & Sexton Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.