alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Bonnie M. Klein, Vice President and Treasurer of BCSB Bancorp, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: February 24, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 02-cv-4421

:

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ, :

:

Defendants. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, to wit this _______ day of __________, 2005, upon consideration of 

the Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Jury Demand and any response thereto, it is

hereby ORDERED and DECREED that the said Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s

Jury Demand is hereby stricken.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

J.

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 47-2 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       193,911,467
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   3,377,213
<MORTGAGE>                                  16,189,127
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  379,977
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             224,557,887
<CASH>                                       2,461,887
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             186,154
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                      27,288,684
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             289,824,531
<POLICY-LOSSES>                            207,115,725
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                         20,069,565
<POLICY-OTHER>                               2,086,316
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                        1,838,602
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,447,797
<OTHER-SE>                                  46,388,119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               289,824,531
<PREMIUMS>                                  42,638,289
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         14,264,246
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             209,186
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 349,310
<BENEFITS>                                  20,767,497
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  (509,103)
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                        33,342,539
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,860,098
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,094,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,766,098
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,766,098
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Noe Lopez Trevino, * From the 42nd District Court

 of Taylor County

Trial Court No. 26485A.

Vs. No. 11-17-00103-CR * April 18, 2019

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Part 2 Fiscal Year 2018 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section III

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Account Transaction Categories

TRANSACTION

CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION

Bulletin No. 2017-06 III AC - 1 June 2017

A. Funding

100 - 399 Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections

400 - 699 Authority Transfers

700 - 799 Reimbursables and Other Income

B. Disbursements and Payables

100 - 299 Payments/Purchases

300 - 399 Commitments/Undelivered Orders/Expended Authority - Unpaid

400 - 599 Payables/Accrued Liabilities

600 - 699 Advances and Prepayments

C. Collections and Receivables

100 - 399 Receipts

400 - 599 Receivables/Accrued Revenue

600 - 799 Asset Sale and Disposition (Gains and Losses)

D. Adjustments/Writeoffs/Reclassification

100 - 299 Upward and Downward Adjustments

300 - 399 Prior-Period Adjustments

400 - 499 Writeoffs

500 - 799 Reclassification/Revaluation

E. Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections

100 - 399 Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499 Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above

500 - 799 Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

F. Yearend

100 - 299 Preclosing Entries

300 - 499 Closing Entries

G. Memorandum Entries

100 - 299 All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

H. Other Specialized Transaction Entries

100 - 799 Other
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO					18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO					SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of SoftNet Technology Corp (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I James Farinella, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.

By: /s/ James Farinella                        James Farinella				      Chief Executive Officer and 				      Chief Financial Officer      March 17, 2006

----
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 7717

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MARLON CORTEZ ROSS , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro

. William L. Osteen, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:15

- cr - 00271

- WO

- 1 ; 1:17

- cv - 00443

- WO

- LPA )

Submitted : November 18, 2020 Decided: December 3, 2020

Before MOTZ, HARRIS, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Marlon Cortez Ross, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Marlon Cort ez Ross seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 225 5 motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)( B ). A certificate of appeal ability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive p rocedural ruling is debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473,
484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ross has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are ad equately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4014 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that income received 

by a regulated investment company from precious metals shall be treated 

as qualifying income. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

that income received by a regulated investment company 

from precious metals shall be treated as qualifying income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Precious Metals Parity 

5 Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4014 IS

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF INCOME RECEIVED BY REGULATED 

2 INVESTMENT COMPANIES FROM PRECIOUS 

3 METALS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 851(b)(2)(A) of the Inter5 nal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

6 (1) by striking ‘‘or foreign currencies’’ and in7 serting ‘‘, foreign currencies, or precious metals,’’, 

8 and 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘or currencies’’ and inserting 

10 ‘‘currencies, or precious metals’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 10.13


EXHIBIT 10.13







Vidshadow, Inc.

1907 Estelle Lane

Placentia, CA 92870




P: 714.646.8102

F: 714.646.8133







November 1, 2007







Supafli Entertainment, Inc

11649 NW 5th Street,

Plantation, Florida 33325

Attn: Norman Brodeur







RE: Development of a Website Platform Technology




The purpose of this letter is to acknowledge the website platform technology development plan between Vidshadow, Inc. and Supafli Entertainment, Inc.




Supafli Entertainment, Inc. wishes Vidshadow, Inc. to develop a website platform whereby Supafli shall be able to show on its own website premium video content incorporating advertisements.




Supafli agrees to pay Vidshadow, Inc. $150,000.00 at the start of work, follow by five (5) monthly installments of $100,000.00 and (1) one final payment of $100,000.00 upon acceptance of the website prior to the site going live.




Total project Compensation $750,000.00










Supafli Entertainment, Inc.  

Vidshadow, Inc.







By: /s/ Norman Brodeur

By: /s/ Jordan Hudgens

Name: Norman Brodeur

Name: Jordan Hudgens

Title: CEO

Title: CEO
# sec6_rbalsh_2017

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RBS - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2017
Part 2, Section VI: USSGL Crosswalks to Reclassified

Statements

This section includes crosswalks for use in Fiscal Year 2020 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map

USSGL accounts to external reports in accordance with TFM Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 4700, Federal

Entity Reporting Requirements for the Financial Report of the United States Government. Each report

crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or column on the

reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This subsidiary

information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional information

on attributes.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by

Fiscal Service:

Section VI Page Number

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Balance Sheet (RBS) VI RBS - 1

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Net Cost (RSNC) VI RSNC - 1

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Operations and

Changes in Net Position (RSOCNP)

VI RSOCNP - 1 

 

Page 1 of 1
**FISC AL**  **YEA R**  **[YEA R]**  **SPREA DSHEET FOR SMA**  **LL, RURA L SCHOOL A**  **CHIEVEMENT PROGRA M**  **LEA s Defined as Rural**  To Define an LEA as Rural, the SEA needs to supply the following documentation in this worksheet:
1. The identity of the State governmental agency that established the definition 2. A copy of the rural definition 3. The SEA’s concurrence that the use of the definition and inclusion of the LEA in the Small, Rural School Achievement Program is appropriate. **1. State A gency that Established the Definition:**  **ST AT**  **E:**
**2. Copy of the State A pproved Definition of Rural:** 

**3. Identification of the LEA , and SEA**  **Concurrence that the use of the definition and inclusion of the LEA**  **in the Small, Rural School A chievement Program is appropriate.** 

**NCES SCHOOL**  **ID # ST**  **AT E**  **SCHOOL ID #**  **SCHOOL LEA NA**  **ME CITY**  **Does the SEA concur that**  **inclusion is appropriate?**  **(YES/NO) NCES** 

**SCHOOL ID #**  **ST AT**  **E SCHOOL**  **ID # SCHOOL LEA**  **NA ME**  **CITY Does the SEA**  **concur that inclusion is**  **appropriate? (YES/NO)** 

**Public Burden Statement:**According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection

displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 40 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and co mpleting and reviewing the collection of information. The obligatio n to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain benefit (ESEA Section 6212/6221). Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including sug gestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S . Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210

- 4537 or email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1810

- 0646. Note: Please do not return the completed REAP application to this address.
If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your individual submission of this form write directly to:

Email: REAPSEA@ed.gov Subject: SRSA Application Status
No. 55212.

#### Canton Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 10601-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Code, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       3,747,776
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,158,109
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      93,755,026
<DEPRECIATION>                              38,466,101
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             147,575,912
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,575,648
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (38,839,736)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               147,575,912
<SALES>                                     43,913,232
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            43,913,232
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               38,878,161
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,451,499
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,860,013)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,860,013)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 57666.

#### Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni *v.*United States,

protest 201821-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the official papers disclosing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest was dismissed as untimely.
No. 61826.

#### Border Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protests 210477-K, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Bulletin No. 2019-06

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-06	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2019

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-06	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2019
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BRIAN TRACEY HILL,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-0775-GEB-GGH-P

vs.

CA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, 

et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has

filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General

Order No. 262.

On August 19, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings

and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and

which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

Case 2:04-cv-00775-RRB-GGH Document 33 Filed 11/22/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Neither party has filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings

and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 19,

2005 are adopted in full; and 

2. Plaintiff’s July 13, 2005, motion for a temporary

restraining order is denied.

Dated: November 22, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00775-RRB-GGH Document 33 Filed 11/22/05 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11195 Conference Calendar

RICKEY LAVERN SHEPPARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLES WILSON; DEBBIE MUSIC; AMERICAN NATIONAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY COMPANY; AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY; ANPAC GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:96-CV-246

- - - - - - - - - - February 21, 1997 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rickey Lavern Sheppard, #232818, appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint. He has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal. The motion for leave to appeal IFP is GRANTED. No initial partial filing fee is required. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). Sheppard shall make monthly payments of twentyNo. 96-11195 - 2 - percent of the preceding month’s income credited to his prison
account. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Sheppard is directed to forward payments from his prisoner account to the clerk of the district court each time the amount in his account exceeds $10 until the filing fee of $105 is paid.
See id. Sheppard argues that he was injured because of defendant Wilson’s negligence and that the remaining defendants have conspired to deprive him of reimbursement for his medical bills. Because Sheppard’s claim lacks an arguable basis in law, the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing his complaint as frivolous. See Eason v. Thaler , 14 F.3d 8, 9 (5th Cir. 1994). Sheppard’s appeal is without arguable merit and, thus, frivolous. See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED.
See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
IFP GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.