alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 57989.

protest 176466-K (New York).

#### Victor M. Calderon Co. and James E. Fox & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it involves the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, is subject to an allowance in duties. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Case 2:05-cv-04436-BMS Document 84 Filed 12/05/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-04436-BMS Document 84 Filed 12/05/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 64811.

#### Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33982 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollinson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133174 & (71)(72) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ANTHONY DiVERGILIO, JR. and Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, VICTORIA A. VALENTINE, Justices Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/ 

Appellants, 

v SC: 133174 

 COA: 261766 

Oakland CC: 2000-026598-CZ 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF WEST 

BLOOMFIELD, 

Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/

Appellee, 

and 

WEST BLOOMFIELD WETLANDS REVIEW 

BOARD and WEST BLOOMFIELD BOARD 

OF TRUSTEES. 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motions for leave to file amicus curiae briefs are 

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the November 2, 2006 judgment of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
Part 1, Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits

One of the goals the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) has envisioned for GTAS is to improve 

the consistency in agency trial balance reporting. This will be accomplished through validations and edits.

The validations ensure that the attributes reported in agencies’ GTAS trial balance submissions are valid for 

the USSGL account. The validations encompass both USSGL level attributes per the USSGL Attribute 

Table and Treasury Account Symbol (TAS) level attributes found in the Super Master Account (SMAF).

Simple validations are those involving one attribute while special validations involve more than one attribute. 

All validations are fatal.

The edits compare the agency trial balances with USSGL rules and with data from authoritative sources 

such as the Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS), Fiscal Service, and the Federal Financing Bank. 

The edits may be either fatal or proposed. Fiscal Service will use the proposed edits only for analytical 

purposes. Fiscal Service disclaims any role or responsibility with the agency auditor relationship concerning 

the GTAS fatal and proposed analytical edits.

The following are the validation and edit reports included in this section:

Section VII Page Number

GTAS Validation Summary Report (VSR) VII VSR - 1

GTAS Validation Detail Report (VDR) VII VDR - 1

GTAS Edits Summary Report (ESR) VII ESR - 1

GTAS Edits Detail Report (EDR) VII EDR - 1

GTAS Closing Edits Report (CER) VII CER - 1

Page 1 of 1
No. 43981.

#### Protests 179337-G, etc., of John Wanamaker (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel embroidered wearing apparel and other articles similar to those involved in *United States*v. *Jabara*(22 C. C. P. A. 77, T. D. 47065) were held dutiable at 75 percent under paragraph 1430. Knit wool lace outerwear similar to that the subject of *United States*v. *International Clearing House*(24 id. 117, T. D. 48416) was held dutiable under paragraph 1114 as claimed.
CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS
  
 I, Steven J. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., an Illinois corporation (the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) the Report on Form 10-Q for the period of the Registrant from January 1, 2011 through March 31, 2011 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
 Dated:  May 13, 2011
 By                 /s/ Steven J. Cohen
 Steven J. Cohen
 President and Director
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Download OTC Endpoints

To download OTC Endpoints, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, select Manage OTC Endpoints>Download OTC 

Endpoints. The Download OTC Endpoint message appears.

2. Click Download as shown in Figure 1. The OTC Endpoint and Form Update dialog box 

appears.

Figure 1. Download OTC Endpoints Review

• When the Task Download OTC Endpoint Started... message appears, the system 

downloads the check capture forms and form data, DDS flag configurations, 

accounting code information, and organization hierarchy details for all OTC Endpoint 

(CHK) for all OTC Endpoints present on the local application.

• To view the accounting codes associated with the OTC Endpoint before downloading 

the OTC Endpoints, click View on the Download OTC Endpoints page. After viewing 

the accounting codes, click Previous to return to the Download OTC Endpoints

page.

3. Click Close. A Confirmation page appears presenting the OTC Endpoints that have been 

successfully downloaded.

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• It is recommended that the Cancel button is not clicked. Instead, wait for the Close 

button to ensure the OTC Endpoints (CHK) and forms are downloaded on the 

Download OTC Endpoints page.

• Only active OTC Endpoints (CHK) that a user has access to are listed.

• OTC Endpoints (TGA) do not display. 

• CHK denotes check capture.

• TGA denotes deposit processing.

• CDC denotes card processing.

Click Return Home to return the OTCnet Home Page.

Application Tips

Additional Button
EXHIBIT
31.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Steven
J. Cohen, the principal executive officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.           The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based upon such evaluation; and





(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants' fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;





5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:





(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.






August
      19, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Steven
      J. CohenSteven
      J. CohenPresident (Principal
      Executive Officer)
Welcome
 Training Module Topics Below are the training topics you need to view deposits, reports and financial institutions and search adjustments in OTCnet. Click **Expand All** to view all resources for your role, or click the arrow next to a module to view the lesson(s) and resources. You can choose to view Web Based Training (WBT) modules, certificates are assigned for critical tasks and are noted by the certificate icon Certificate icon. You can also review Printable Job Aids (PJAs) and Videos that support your OTCnet user training.  Expand All
  GETTING STARTED MODULE 1: OTCNET OVERVIEW 1.1 OTCnet Overview
            PJA
            VideoOTCnet Overview
 MODULE 2: ACCESSING OTCnet Certificate icon2.1 Start and Stop the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB) Application
            PJA
            VideoStart and Stop the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB) ApplicationCertificate icon2.2 Request Your OTCnet AccessSelf-Register/Create an Account in SailPoint IIQRequest Your OTCnet Access in SailPoint IIQCertificate icon2.3 Log In to OTCnet OnlineLog In to OTCnet Online
 ADMINISTRATION/CONFIGURATION MODULE 5: VIEWING FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS 5.1 View a Financial Institution
            PJA
            VideoView a Financial Institution
 DEPOSIT PROCESSING MODULE 10: SEARCHING DEPOSITS Certificate icon10.1 Search for a Deposit
            PJA
            VideoSearch for a DepositDownload Search Results for a Deposit
 MODULE 11: VIEWING DEPOSITS Certificate icon11.1 View a Deposit
            PJA
            VideoView a Deposit
 MODULE 12: SEARCHING ADJUSTMENTS Certificate icon12.1 Search for and View an Adjustment
            PJA
            VideoSearch for and View an AdjustmentDownload Search Adjustment Results for a Deposit
 MODULE 17: VIEWING DEPOSIT PROCESSING AND HISTORICAL REPORTS 17.3 View an Administration Report
            PJA
            VideoView Administrative Reports: CIR File StatusView Administration Reports: View Vouchers CompletedView Administrative Reports: Vouchers in Progress17.4 View Historical ReportsDeposit Historical ReportAdjustment Historical ReportView Previously Generated Historical Reports
 Welcome
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1471 

To ensure the compliance of Department of Defense regulations with Federal 

consumer protection laws on the collection of debt. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2017 

Ms. WARREN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To ensure the compliance of Department of Defense regulations with Federal consumer protection laws on the collection of debt. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Servicemember Debt 

5 Collection Reform Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1471 IS

1 SEC. 2. REVIEW AND UPDATE OF REGULATIONS GOV2 ERNING DEBT COLLECTORS INTERACTIONS 

3 WITH UNIT COMMANDERS OF MEMBERS OF 

4 THE ARMED FORCES. 

5 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact6 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall review 

7 and update Department of Defense Directive 1344.09 and 

8 any associated regulations to ensure that such regulations 

9 comply with Federal consumer protection laws with re10 spect to the collection of debt. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 77-3 Filed 08/10/2004 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 77-3 Filed 08/10/2004 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 77-3 Filed 08/10/2004 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 77-3 Filed 08/10/2004 Page 4 of 4
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellant,

v.

IVAN GABALDON,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-21-00216-CR

Appeal from the

210th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC#20210D02909)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Soto, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.)(Sitting by Assignment)
Opinion issued November 10, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 5
- 00 934
- CV

——————————— IN RE C ELIA REAR , Relator

Original Proceeding o n Petition f or Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION R elator, Celia Rear , filed a petition for writ of mandamus on November 3 , 201 5 , seeking to compel the respondent trial judge to vacate her oral order , made during a hearing on February 5 , 2015, denying the relator’ s plea to the jurisdiction and request for the court to decline jurisdiction in the underlying petition to modify2

the parent

- child relationship. 1 R elator also filed a motion for emergency stay of jury trial on November 3, 2015, seeking a s tay of the pretrial conference set for November 6, 2015, and the jury trial set for November 16, 2015 , pending resolution of h er petition

. On November 3 , 2015, the real part y in interest, Jason Edward Min ton, filed a second amended response to relator’ s motion

. T he Court, having examined and considered the petition and appendix, motion, and response, is of the opinion that relator has not established herself entitled to the mandamus relief sought. Accordi ngly , w e d eny the petition for writ of mandamus

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.8(a) , (d)

. We dismiss the motion for emergency relief as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd

.

1 The underlying case is In the Interest of S.A.M., a Child , Cause No. 20 05

- 0474 7 , pending in the 3 1 1 th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Alicia Franklin York presiding.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA, No. CIV S-04-0544 MCE KJM P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

MULE CREEK STATE PRISON

MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, ET AL., 

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On June 6, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-00544-MCE -KJM Document 39 Filed 07/26/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that: 

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 6, 2005, are

adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Local

Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

DATED: July 26, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00544-MCE -KJM Document 39 Filed 07/26/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 22

INTERNATIONAL ALUMINUM CORPORATION  SUBSIDIARIES

The following is a list of the significant subsidiaries of the Registrant and the jurisdiction under which each is organized. The Company owns
100 percent of the voting securities of each such subsidiary.

|Name Of Subsidiary                                     |  | Jurisdiction
Of
Organization
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------
|International Window Corporation                       |  | California                  
|General Window Corporation*                            |  | California                  
|International Window-Arizona, Inc.                     |  | California                  
|Maestro Products, Inc.                                 |  | California                  
|International Window-Colorado, Inc.                    |  | Colorado                    
|United States Aluminum Corporation                     |  | California                  
|United States Aluminum Corporation-Illinois            |  | California                  
|United States Aluminum Corporation-Texas               |  | Texas                       
|United States Aluminum Corporation-Carolina            |  | California                  
|United States Aluminum Of Canada-British Columbia Ltd. |  | Canada                      
|United States Aluminum Of Canada-Ontario Ltd.          |  | Canada                      
|Raco Interior Products, Inc.                           |  | Texas                       
|International Extrusion Corporation                    |  | California                  
|International Extrusion Corporation-Texas              |  | California                  

---

---

QuickLinks
No. 55211.

#### Kwong Yuen Shing et al. *v.*United States,

protests 995740-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED SEPTEMBER 7, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENTOF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2011-1117 

FLEETAVIATION, LLC, 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2010EA110021 

Respondent 

ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE 

OF CR 16 LITIGATION SCHEDULING CONFERENCE 

On July 9, 2012 an Order Granting Continuance of Fourth Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling 

Conference was filed. Among other things, this Order re~set the Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling 

Conference to September 6, 2012. 

On September 6, 2012 the parties appeared fora 5th CR 16 Litigation Scheduling 

Conference. Among other things, the parties npted that a settlement was imminent, based on · 

recent action in a companion case that was filed in the U.S. District Court. The partiesjointly 

requested a brief continuance to obtain paperwork from the U.S. District Court case, and to 

exchange settlement documents in the case herein. 

After reviewing all relevant pleadings, motions, caselaw, regulation, statutory authority, 

and being fully advised; · · 

. It Is Hereby Ordered: 

1. The CR 16 Litigation Scheduling Conferenceis continued to October4, 2012 at 

2:00pm (EST). The Office of Hearings shall initiate the conference call. 

Attaclnilent - Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ORIGINAL & O~E COPY 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGG430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Slite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Gregory S. Winton, Respondent's Counsel 

The Aviation Law Firm 

One Research Court, Suite 450 · 

Rockville, MD 20850 

TEL: 301-294-8550 

FAX: 301-294-2525 

Zachery M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AEA-7 . 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: . 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office. of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 

1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS NO. FAA-2011-1117 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

.. 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

~