31222 Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 18, 2016 / Proposed Rules 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide the EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address 

disproportionate human health or 

environmental effects with practical, 

appropriate, and legally permissible 

methods under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

Executive Order 13175, entitled 

‘‘Consultation and Coordination with 

Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 

67249, November 9, 2000), requires the 

EPA to develop an accountable process 

to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input 

by tribal officials in the development of 

regulatory policies that have tribal 

implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have Tribal 

implications’’ is defined in the 

Executive Order to include regulations 

that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on 

one or more Indian tribes, on the 

relationship between the Federal 

government and the Indian tribes, or on 

the distribution of power and 

responsibilities between the Federal 

government and Indian Tribes.’’ 

Eight Indian tribes are located within 

the boundaries of the San Joaquin 

Valley air quality planning area for the 

1997 8-hour ozone, 2006 24-hour PM2.5, 

and 1987 24-hour PM10 standards: the 

Big Sandy Rancheria of Mono Indians of 

California, the Cold Springs Rancheria 

of Mono Indians of California, the North 

Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians of 

California, the Picayune Rancheria of 

Chukchansi Indians of California, the 

Santa Rosa Rancheria of the Tachi 

Yokut Tribe, the Table Mountain 

Rancheria of California, the Tejon 

Indian Tribe, and the Tule River Indian 

Tribe of the Tule River Reservation. 

The EPA’s proposed approval of the 

revised budgets submitted by CARB to 

address the 1997 8-hour ozone, 2006 24- 

hour PM2.5, and 1987 24-hour PM10

standards in the San Joaquin Valley 

would not have tribal implications 

because the SIP is not approved to apply 

on any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where the EPA or an Indian 

tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the proposed SIP approvals do 

not have tribal implications and will not 

impose substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

Therefore, the EPA has concluded that 

the proposed action will not have tribal 

implications for the purposes of 

Executive Order 13175, and would not 

impose substantial direct costs upon the 

tribes, nor would it preempt Tribal law. 

We note that none of the tribes located 

in the San Joaquin Valley has requested 

eligibility to administer programs under 

the CAA. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental 

regulations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 

Particulate matter, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur 

dioxide, Volatile organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: May 9, 2016. 

Deborah Jordan, 

Acting Regional Administrator, EPA 

Region 9. 

[FR Doc. 2016–11741 Filed 5–17–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 82 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0663; FRL–9946–50– 

OAR] 

RIN 2060–AS80 

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: 

Proposed New Listings of Substitutes; 

Changes of Listing Status; and 

Reinterpretation of Unacceptability for 

Closed Cell Foam Products Under the 

Significant New Alternatives Policy 

Program; and Revision of Clean Air 

Act Section 608 Venting Prohibition for 

Propane 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; 

extension of public comment period. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is announcing that the 

period for providing public comments 

on the April 18, 2016, proposed 

‘‘Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: 

Proposed New Listings of Substitutes; 

Changes of Listing Status; and 

Reinterpretation of Unacceptability for 

Closed Cell Foam Products under the 

Significant New Alternatives Policy 

Program; and Revision of Clean Air Act 

Section 608 Venting Prohibition for 

Propane’’ is being extended by 14 days. 

DATES: Comments. The public comment 

period for the proposed rule, which 

published April 18, 2016, (81 FR 22810) 

is being extended by 14 days and will 

close on June 16, 2016. This extension 

provides the public additional time to 

submit comments and supporting 

information. 

ADDRESSES: Comments. Submit your 

comments, identified by Docket ID No. 

EPA–HQ–OAR–2015–0663, to the 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or withdrawn. The EPA may 

publish any comment received to its 

public docket. Do not submit 

electronically any information you 

consider to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. EPA will generally 

not consider comments or comment 

contents located outside of the primary 

submission (i.e., on the Web, cloud, or 

other file sharing system). For 


ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 96 / Wednesday, May 18, 2016 / Proposed Rules 31223 

additional submission methods, the full 

EPA public comment policy, 

information about CBI or multimedia 

submissions, and general guidance on 

making effective comments, please visit 

https://www.epa.gov/dockets/

commenting-epa-dockets. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Chenise Farquharson, Stratospheric 

Protection Division, Office of 

Atmospheric Programs (Mail Code 6205 

T), Environmental Protection Agency, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., 

Washington, DC 20460; telephone 

number: 202–564–7768; email address: 

Farquharson.chenise@epa.gov. Notices 

and rulemakings under EPA’s 

Significant New Alternatives Policy 

program are available on EPA’s 

Stratospheric Ozone Web site at https:// 

www.epa.gov/snap/snap-regulations. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Comment Period 

The EPA is extending the public 

comment period for the proposed rule 

(81 FR 22810; April 18, 2016) an 

additional 14 days. The public comment 

period will end on June 16, 2016, rather 

than June 2, 2016. This will provide the 

public additional time to review and 

comment on all of the information 

available, including the proposed rule 

and other materials in the docket. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Air pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Recycling, Reporting and 

recordkeeping requirements, 

Stratospheric ozone layer. 

Dated: May 11, 2016. 

Sarah Dunham, 

Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs. 

[FR Doc. 2016–11627 Filed 5–17–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Parts 73 and 74 

[MB Docket Nos. 07–294 and 10–103, MD 

Docket No. 10–234; Report No. 3043] 

Petitions for Reconsideration of Action 

in Rulemaking Proceeding 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Petitions for reconsideration. 

SUMMARY: Petitions for Reconsideration 

(Petitions) have been filed in the 

Commission’s rulemaking proceeding 

by: Lawrence M. Miller, on behalf of 

Public Broadcasting Parties, Sylvia 

Strobel, on behalf of American Public 

Media Group, Todd D. Gray, on behalf 

of NCE Licensees and Joseph B. Porter, 

on behalf of The State University of 

New York. 

DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions 

must be filed on or before June 2, 2016. 

Replies to an opposition must be filed 

on or before June 13, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications 

Commission, 445 12th Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jessica Campbell, Media Bureau, (202) 

418–3609, email: jessica.campbell@

fcc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of Commission’s document, 

Report No. 3043, released May 9, 2016. 

The full text of the Petitions is available 

for viewing and copying at the FCC 

Reference Information Center, 445 12th 

Street SW., Room CY–A257, 

Washington, DC 20554 or may be 

accessed online via the Commission’s 

Electronic Comment Filing System at 

http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The 

Commission will not send a copy of this 

Public Notice pursuant to the 

Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 

801(a)(1)(A), because this Public Notice 

does not have an impact on any rules of 

particular applicability. 

Subject: Promoting Diversification of 

Ownership in the Broadcasting Services, 

published at 81 FR 19432, April 4, 2016, 

in MB Docket Nos. 07–294 and 10–103, 

MD Docket No. 10–234, and FCC 16–1. 

This Public Notice is being published 

pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 

CFR 1.4(b)(1). 

Number of Petitions Filed: 4 

Federal Communications Commission. 

Marlene H. Dortch, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2016–11689 Filed 5–17–16; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 


ehiers on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS