alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8366]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3187]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER07-523-000]


ColumbiaGrid; Notice of Filing

February 13, 2007.

    Take notice that on February 2, 2007, ColumbiaGrid, acting on 
behalf of Avista Corporation and Puget Sound Energy, Inc. tendered for 
filing a Planning and Expansion Functional Agreement with an effective 
date of April 4, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#efa9aabdaca0818386818abc9a9f9f809d9baf898a9d8cc1888099"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c0868592838faeaca9aea593b5b0b0afb2b480a6a5b2a3eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on February 23, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3187 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT 

DRAFT Fiscal Year 2018 Reporting

Section VII 

Edit

No

Prior 

Year 

USSGL 

Account

Beginning

Ending 

Balance 

Indicator

Authority

Type Code

TAS 

Status

Reporting

Type Code

TAS Status 

Transitioning 

Code

Beginning

Balance 

USSGL 

Account

435100 E 420100

435500 E 420100

435600 E 420100

437000 E 420100

21 438500 E P/S 420100

438700 E 420100

438800 E 420100

439000 E 420100

439100 E 420100

435700 E 438400

438200 E 438400

438300 E 438400

438400 E 438400

21 438500 E 438400

439400 E 439400

439401 E 439400

439600 E 439400

415700 E 439700

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Closing Edits Detail Report

Bulletin No. 2019-02 DRAFT VII CER - 1 IRC Handout 12/4/18
<PAGE>


                                                                 EXHIBIT 32.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ameriprise Certificate
Company (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), Paula R. Meyer, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Brian J. McGrane, as Principal and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of 13(a) or
              15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
              all material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.


/s/ Paula R. Meyer
------------------------------
Name:  Paula R. Meyer
Title: Chief Executive Officer
Date:  March 10, 2006


/s/ Brian J. McGrane
------------------------------
Name:  Brian J. McGrane
Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:  March 10, 2006



The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being "filed" as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate
disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), or otherwise subject to
liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933,
as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1
is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 02-CV-4421

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Anita F. Alberts, Esquire, being duly sworn and according to law, hereby certify that a true and

correct copy of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File Addendum to Brief Opposing Defendants’ Motion

for Summary Judgment was served upon counsel for defendants by First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid,

at the address and on the date listed below.

Sidney L. Gold, Esquire

LOVITZ & GOLD, P.C.

Suite 515, Eleven Penn Center

1835 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Date: 

Anita F. Alberts, Esquire

Attorney I.D. #28086

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 26-2 Filed 01/25/2005 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 4-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 20 of 20
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 404 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 404

 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
   Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2023

 Ms. Cortez Masto (for herself and Ms. Rosen) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Secretary of Energy to obtain the consent of affected 
   State and local governments before making an expenditure from the 
   Nuclear Waste Fund for a nuclear waste repository, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nuclear Waste Informed Consent 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act, the terms ``affected Indian tribe'', ``affected unit 
of local government'', ``high-level radioactive waste'', 
``repository'', ``Secretary'', ``spent nuclear fuel'', and ``unit of 
general local government'' have the meanings given the terms in section 
2 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10101).

SEC. 3. CONSENT-BASED APPROVAL.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may not make an expenditure from the 
Nuclear Waste Fund established under section 302(c) of the Nuclear 
Waste Policy Act of 1982 (42 U.S.C. 10222(c)) for the costs of the 
activities described in paragraphs (4) and (5) of section 302(d) of 
that Act (42 U.S.C. 10222(d)) unless the Secretary has entered into an 
agreement for a repository with--
            (1) the Governor of the State in which the repository is 
        proposed to be located;
            (2) each affected unit of local government;
            (3) any unit of general local government contiguous to the 
        affected unit of local government if spent nuclear fuel or 
        high-level radioactive waste will be transported through that 
        unit of general local government for disposal at the 
        repository; and
            (4) each affected Indian tribe.
    (b) Conditions on Agreement.--Any agreement for a repository under 
this Act--
            (1) shall be in writing and signed by all parties;
            (2) shall be binding on the parties; and
            (3) shall not be amended or revoked except by mutual 
        agreement of the parties.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                           EARLE M. JORGENSEN COMPANY

                      LISTING OF THE COMPANY'S SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                          DATE                         STATE/
                                                        NATURE OF       ACQUIRED         %           COUNTRY OF
NAME                                                     BUSINESS      OR CREATED       OWNED       INCORPORATION
----                                                    ---------      ----------       -----       -------------
<S>                                                    <C>             <C>              <C>         <C>
Earle M. Jorgensen (Canada) Inc. (formerly Kilsby         Metal         11/13/90         100%           Canada
   Jorgensen Steel & Aluminum Inc.)                    Distributor

Stainless Insurance Ltd.                                 Captive        03/20/96         100%           Bermuda
                                                        Insurance
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on 10-Q of Tongli Pharmaceuticals
(USA), Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), Mingli Yao, principal executive officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date:  August 14, 2012                                      
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|By:                                                         
|Name: Mingli Yao                                            
|Title: Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)










This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 19
- 00264
- CR ADRIAN ANDRES RAMOS , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 19th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2015
- 705
- C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION
The jury convicted Adrian Ramos of the offense of sexual assault, and the trial court assessed punishment at three years confinement. The trial court suspended imposition of the confinement portion of the sentence and placed Ramos on community supervision for five years. The State filed a motion to revoke alleging thirteen violations of Ramos’s community supervision. The trial court held a hearing on the motion to revoke, and Ramos pleaded true to eleven of the violations. The trial court found elevenR amos v. State Page 2

o f the allegations to be true, revoked Ramos’s community supervision, and assessed punishment at three years confinement. We affirm. Ramos’s appointed counsel filed an Anders brief asserting that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and that, in his opinion, the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel informed Ramos of his right to submit a response on his own behalf. Ramos did not file a response. Counsel's brief evidences a professional evaluation of the record for error, and we conclude that counsel performed the duties required of appointed counsel. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. at 744; High v.
State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); s ee also In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 407 (Tex. Cri m. App. 2008). In reviewing an Anders appeal, we must, "after a full examination of all the proceedings, ... decide whether the case is wholly frivolous." See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. at; accord Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503, 509

- 11 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). An appeal is "wholly frivolous" or "without merit" when it "lacks any basis in law or fact." McCoy v. Court of Appeals , 486 U.S. 429, 439 n. 10 (1988). After a review of the entire record in this appeal, we determine the appeal to be wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

- 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment. Counsel's request that he be allowed to withdraw from representation of Ramos is granted. Additionally, counsel must send Ramos a copy of our decision, notify Ramos of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review, and send this Court a letterR amos v. State Page 3

certifying counsel's compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 48.4.
T EX .R.A PP .P . 48.4; see also In re Schulma n , 252 S.W.3d at 409 n.22.

JOHN E. NEILL Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Affirmed; motion granted Opinion delivered and filed November 27, 2019 Do not publish [CR25]
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 032 Attachment Name CSGPE Manufacturing Process Description Summary and Worker Exposure Associated PMN Section Number Pt.2, Sec.A, 1d.

Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 24

                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

    The undersigned hereby constitute and appoint Irving Weiser, John C. 
Appel, and David J. Parrin, and each of them, his true and lawful 
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full powers of substitution and 
resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all 
capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dain Rauscher 
Corporation for the fiscal year ending December 31, 1998 and all amendments to 
such Annual Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same with all exhibits 
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each 
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform to all intents and 
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying all that said 
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitutes, may 
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.


           SIGNATURE                           DATE
           ---------                           ----

        John C. Appel                       3/6/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
        John C. Appel


      David J. Parrin                       3/6/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
      David J. Parrin                       


       Irving Weiser                        3/6/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
       Irving Weiser


     Kenneth J. Wessels                     3/8/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
     Kenneth J. Wessels


     J. Evans Attwell                       3/1/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
     J. Evans Attwell


      Susan S. Boren                        3/1/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
      Susan S. Boren


   F. Gregory Fitz-Gerald                   3/6/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
   F. Gregory Fitz-Gerald


     Walter F. Mondale                      3/1/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
     Walter F. Mondale


     C.A. Rundell, Jr.                      3/1/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
     C.A. Rundell, Jr.


      Robert L. Ryan                        3/9/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
      Robert L. Ryan


   Arthur R. Schulze, Jr.                   3/2/99
  ------------------------            ---------------------
   Arthur R. Schulze, Jr.
EAR

February 11, 2013

Lauralyn J. Remo

DOT, Office of Aviation Analysis, Air Carrier Fitness Division, X-56

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Ms. Remo:

The SouthEast Alaska Regional Health Consortium (SEARHC) writes in support of continuing Island Air Express’s certificate to carry mail. 

SEARHC is one of the oldest nonprofit Tribal health consortiums in the nation. We provide health 

and wellness services for 18 communities in Southeast Alaska. Like many of our communities,

Prince of Wales Island is accessed by plane or boat. Quite often, weather hinders the delivery of mail 

to Klawock.

Island Air Express provides reliable day/night IFR passenger service as well as transporting the 

Klawock mail on these dependable flights. Additionally, the company is locally-based, and provides 

employment for local people.

Feel free to contact me at 907-463-4000, if you have questions.

Sincerely,

Charles Clement

President and CEO
No. 47821.

#### Protests 978300-G, etc., of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp. (New York).

*357Opinion by

Olives, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in-all material respects to the merchandise covered by Abstract 47109, and in view of the further stipulation that they are not composed in any part of synthetic resin or ivory, that they do not imitate pearls, and are not imitation pearl beads, the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 1503, as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Warning Model Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stanley Tepper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
 the Company.
 
 August 20 , 2004
 
 /s/ Stanley Tepper
 Stanley Tepper, Chief Financial Officer
No. 60028.

#### Albert Verley & Co. and Judson Sheldon Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 138864-K (New York).

*475Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co. Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EX-10.2






EXECUTIVE BONUS PLAN SCHEDULE

Pursuant to the Fiscal Year 2009 Campus Support Bonus Plan




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Award as a % of Annual Base Pay	 	Component	 	 	 	 
	Target %
	 	 	[   ]	%	 	Company Budgeted Operating Profit	 	 	100	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Maximum %
	 	 	[   ]	%	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Gate
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Compliance - The company must receive an annual average compliance audit score of

	“3.5” or better to achieve a bonus award.
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 







	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Company Budgeted Operating Profit Payout Tiers (1)

	 
	 	% of Operating Profit Goal Achieved	 	% of Bonus Target Earned
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Maximum
	 	 	= 130.0	%	 	 	200.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	124.00	%	 	 	180.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	118.00	%	 	 	160.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	112.00	%	 	 	140.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	106.00	%	 	 	120.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Target
	 	 	100.00	%	 	 	100.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	98.00	%	 	 	88.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	96.00	%	 	 	76.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	94.00	%	 	 	64.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	92.00	%	 	 	52.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	90.00	%	 	 	40.0	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	=  90.0	%	 	 	0.00	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 







	 	(1)	 	Awards for performance levels shown are calculated using interpolation between points.