alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 15 Filed 01/18/06 Page 1 of 5Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 15 Filed 01/18/06 Page 2 of 5Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 15 Filed 01/18/06 Page 3 of 5Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 15 Filed 01/18/06 Page 4 of 5Case 2:04-cv-00878-TLN-DAD Document 15 Filed 01/18/06 Page 5 of 5
09.04 Manage User Profiles
Employment Agreement with David Cuthbert





Exhibit 10.3

 

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

Agreement made between The GNS Group, Inc., located at 4017 Colby Avenue, Everett, WA, herein referred to as “Company”.

And

David Cuthbert, herein referred to as “Employee”.

Company hereby employs employee to perform such duties at such times and in such manner as the company may from time to time direct.

Employee agrees that he will perform those duties assigned to him to the best of his ability, to maintain a current and complete account of his work and expenses, to remit promptly to the company any monies paid to him or coming into his possession which belong to the company.

In consideration of the foregoing, company agrees to pay to employee the amount of $3,000 per month plus reasonable travel expenses incurred for the purpose of conducting company business.

This contract shall become effective on March 1, 2007 and remain in effect until it is terminated by either party. Either party may terminate this agreement by providing the other party with 30 days written notice of his or their intention. Should this agreement be terminated by either party, employee agrees that the payment in full to the date of termination shall fully satisfy all claims against the company under this agreement.


	Agreed:  	Agreed:  
	  
	  
	  
	  
	ANTOINE JARJOUR  	DAVID CUTHBERT  
	By: President  	Employee  
	The GNS Group, Inc.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The
undersigned, Royce Diener and Geoffrey Alison, hereby jointly certify as Follows:



a. They are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, Respectively, of Intrac, Inc. (the Company);



b. To the best of their knowledge, the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report) complies in all material respects with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



c. To the best of their knowledge, based upon a review of the Report, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the period certified.



By:

/s/    ROYCE DIENERRoyce Diener President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:

January 28, 2004




By:

/s/    GEOFFREY ALISONGeoffrey Alison Chief Financial OfficerDate:

January 28, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICKY HAMMONDS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0909 MCE GGH P

vs.

I. REYES, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER & WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

 / AD TESTIFICANDUM

Ricky Hammonds, inmate # J-97984, a necessary and material witness in

proceedings in this case on March 22, 2006, is confined in California State Prison Sacramento,

Prison Road, P.O. Box 290002, Represa, CA, 95671-0002, in the custody of the Scott M.

Kernan; in order to secure this inmate's attendance it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus

ad Testificandum issue commanding the custodian to produce the inmate in Court, 15 Floor, th

Courtroom #3, United States Courthouse, 501 I Street, Sacramento, California on March 22,

2006, at 9:00 a.m. 

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum issue, under the seal of this court,

commanding the Warden to produce the inmate named above to testify in United States District

Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of court proceedings or

as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above institution; 

2. The custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this

inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order and

writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum on the Out-To-Court Desk, California State Prison -

Sacramento, P.O. Box 290007, Represa, California 95671.

4. The clerk of the court is directed to serve a courtesy copy of this order and writ

of habeas corpus ad testificandum by facsimile transmission to (916) 294-3116 at California

State Prison Sacramento, Out-To-Court Desk, Attention: Allison

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM

To: Warden Scott M. Kernan, California State Prison, Sacramento, Prison Road, P.O. Box

290002, Represa, CA 95671-0002:

WE COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to testify before the

United States District Court at the time and place above, and from day to day until completion of

the proceedings or as ordered by the court; and thereafter to return the inmate to the above

institution.

FURTHER, you have been ordered to notify the court of any change in custody

of the inmate and have been ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ.

DATED: March 9, 2006.

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

GGH:mp; hamm0909.841 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00909-MCE -GGH Document 72 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 1
Treasury Financial Experience (TFX) Brief 

Issues Resolution Committee (IRC) Meeting

February 15, 2024
Page 2 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

Agenda

When?

What?

Where?

Why?

Who?

The 5 Ws of TFX...

1. Who is impacted?

2. What is happening?

3. When are we moving? 

4. Where are we going?

5. Why are we changing?
Page 3 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

The 5 Ws of TFX – Who?

Who is impacted? 

 All users of the TFM site (https://tfm.fiscal.treasury.gov)*

*Site will be turned off 3/31/24
Page 4 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

The 5 Ws of TFX – What?

Classic View

 Traditional version of the TFM for users who 

prefer to navigate by Volume and Chapter. 

 Mirrors current TFM format. 

 Minor updates/fixes in navigation tabs.

Topical View

 Task-based navigation.

 Multiple ways to find information.

 Robust search with new content management 

system.

What is happening? 2 TFM Views!
Page 5 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

The 5 Ws of TFX – When? Where?

When? 

Save the date! 

March 31, 2024 

 Legacy TFM site turned 

off.

 Users will be redirected 

from TFM to TFX.

Where? 

New Location!

 Visit the TFX site to tour 

the 2 TFM view options!

https://tfx.treasury.gov/ 

 Site active now!!!
Page 6 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

The 5 Ws of TFX – Why?

Why are we changing?

Fiscal Service started the journey to reimagine the Federal Financial Management 

experience.

2017: Initial assessment of TFM Vol. 1, conducting 8 Focus Groups with over 350 participants, which 

identified significant issues in quality, consistency, search, content and external linking.

2019: TFX was initiated to address these issues and ultimately become a user-centric resource, 

integrating information across multiple areas to streamline financial management and provide a more 

personalized experience for those who use it. 

TFX will become one-stop-shop for Fiscal Service policy, guidance, and instruction.

Look for more content areas to move into TFX!

A look 

back...

Now

Future
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

Nos. 04-22-00409-CV, 04-22-00410-CV

Jim KIRKLAND and Joe Kirkland,

Appellants

v.

V & S TOTAL TRADE, LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2022CV01025, 2022CV01033

Honorable Kevin Henderson, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE RIOS

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, the judgments are 

VACATED IN PART and REVERSED AND RENDERED IN PART. We vacate the portion of 

the trial court’s judgments pertaining to possession. We reverse the portion of the trial court’s 

judgments awarding attorney’s fees, and render judgment that Total Trade recover no attorney’s 

fees in each cause. Costs of appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.

SIGNED June 12, 2024.

_____________________________

Irene Rios, Justice
(Reap. Dec. 11013)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 10088-H.

(Decided June 15, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisemeut has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part thereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs No. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit
32.1





Written
Statement of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350





Solely
for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we, the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Alliant Energy Corporation (the
“Company”), hereby certify, based on our knowledge, that the Annual Report on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/
William D. Harvey


William
D. Harvey


Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer





/s/
Patricia L. Kampling


Patricia
L. Kampling


Executive
Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer





February
26, 2010
exh10-2_note.htm


     

    
      

      

    

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    EXHIBIT 10.2

     

    DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE IN FAVOR OF

    GORDON E. BECKSTEAD DATED JULY 2, 2008

    
 

    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    DEMAND
PROMISSORY NOTE

     

    $25,000.00                                                                                                                                          Lakewood,
Colorado

                                                                                                                                                                                July 2,
2008

    


    For value
received, the undersigned, V2K INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Colorado corporation (the
“Borrower”),
hereby promises to pay on demand, to the order of Gordon E. Beckstead (the
“Lender”), at,
6635 East Sage Lane, Parker, CO 80138, or at any other place designated at any
time by the holder hereof, in lawful money of the United States of America and
in immediately available funds, the principal sum of TWENTY-FIVE THOUSAND AND
NO/100 DOLLARS ($25,000.00) together with interest on the principal amount
hereunder, computed on the basis of the actual number of days elapsed and a
365-day year, from the date hereof until this Note is fully paid at the rate of
TWELVE PERCENT (12%) per annum.

    


    The
Borrower hereby agrees to pay all costs of collection, including attorneys’ fees
and legal expenses, in the event this Note is not paid when due, whether or not
legal proceedings are commenced.

    


    Presentment
or other demand for payment, notice of dishonor and protest are expressly
waived.

    


    
      	 
      	
              V2K
      INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Colorado corporation

            
	 
      	
               

              By    /s/ Jerry A.
      Kukuchka                                    
      

               

              Its        
      CFO
IPAC Operational Metrics for January 2024

- Sheet1
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                       TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Zaki Rakib, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: May 10, 2004

                                                 /s/ Zaki Rakib
                                                --------------------------------
                                                           Zaki Rakib
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST NATIONAL INSURANCE ) 2:04-cv-0836-GEB-JFM

COMPANY OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, ) ORDER

)

v. )

)

MBA CONSTRUCTION, et al. )

)

Defendants. )

 )

In an Order filed on July 22, 2005, on Plaintiff’s Motion

for Partial Summary Judgment for collateralization, the Court found

that Plaintiff First National Insurance Company of America is entitled

to collateralization in the amount of $77,728.00 from the Defendants

MBA Construction, dba Mack Construction (“Mack Construction”), Kevin

Mack, Katie Baugh, and Danny Baugh, jointly and severally. However,

the Order failed to set a deadline for the payment. Therefore,

Defendants Mack Construction, Kevin Mack, Katie Baugh, and Danny

Baugh, shall collateralize Plaintiff in the amount of $77,728.00,

within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: August 11, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00836-GEB -JFM Document 64 Filed 08/12/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2
                                 ------------


                      Park City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                      ------------------------------------
                            Certification Pursuant To
                            -------------------------
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                 ----------------------------------------------
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Peter Jensen,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
              material   respects,   the  financial   condition  and  result  of
              operations of the Company.

Dated:   October 14, 2003


/s/ Peter Jensen
----------------
Peter Jensen
Chief Financial Officer
MATERIALS NOT INCLUDED IN

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (AD) DOCKET

FAA-2012-0087

Docket Number

2011-SW-029-AD

Directorate Identifier

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained 

in the Supplemental AD Docket

Aviation Specialties Unlimited Inc., ASB No. ASU 206-2010-11-1, dated 

November 4, 2010

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel,

Southwest Region

Rules Docket

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663

Fort Worth, Texas 76137

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________

No. 96-60064

Summary Calendar

____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN H. O’BRYANT,

Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

( 1:95-CR-33-D )

__________________________________________

August 14, 1996

Before SMITH, DUHÉ, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John H. O’Bryant appeals his jury conviction and sentence for

possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute under 21

U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(C), possession of marijuana with intent

to distribute under § 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(D), and using and carrying

a firearm during and in relation to a drug-trafficking offense

under § 924(c)(1). 
2

O’Bryant contends that the district court abused its

discretion in refusing to allow him to present the testimony of a

Sheriff and an attorney who represented O’Bryant in prior state

drug cases, to support the theory that the state and federal

officers planted the drugs. Of course, review of a district

court’s evidentiary ruling is “highly deferential”, and we will

generally reverse only for an abuse of discretion. United States

v. Williams, 993 F.2d 451, 457 (5th Cir. 1993). The court did not

abuse its discretion in concluding that the witnesses’ testimony,

which concerned only the 1992 state drug case against O’Bryant, was

not relevant to the issues of O’Bryant’s guilt as to the charges in

the instant case. Accordingly, we AFFIRM O’Bryant’s convictions

under § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) & (b)(1)(D).

O’Bryant contends that his conviction under § 924(c)(1) for

using and carrying a firearm in relation to a drug-trafficking

offense should be reversed based on the Supreme Court’s recent

decision in United States v. Bailey, ___ U.S. ___, 116 S. Ct. 501

(1995). The Government counters that, although the evidence may be

insufficient post-Bailey to support the “use” prong of § 924(c)(1),

it is sufficient to support the “carry” prong. 

But, because the jury may have rendered the guilty verdict

based on the pre-Bailey instructions concerning the “use” prong of

§ 924(c)(1), we REVERSE O’Bryant’s § 924(c)(1) conviction and
3

REMAND for a retrial based on the “carry” prong. See United States

v. Fike, 82 F.3d 1315, 1327-28 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED and REMANDED IN PART
----

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350    As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report (the "Report") of Strategic  Internet Investments, Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB  for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof. I, Abbas Salih, Chief Financial Officer of the  Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge andbelief:

| 1.     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                    |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                             |
| 2.     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|   |           |   |                       |
|--------|----------------|--------|----------------------------|
|   |           |   |                       |
| Date:  | March 31, 2005 |   | /s/ Abbas Salih            |
|   |                |   |                            |
|   |           |   | Abbas Salih, CFO, Director |
|   |           |   |                       |

----