alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                       TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Zaki Rakib, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

            (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934, and

            (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods
                  indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: July 26, 2004                                  /s/Zaki Rakib
                                                     -------------
                                                      Zaki Rakib
                                                Chief Executive Officer
#### Robert JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Martha A. WANNAMAKER, Warden at Tyger River Correctional Institution; Charles M. Condon, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 00-7804.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 17, 2001.

*115Robert Jones, pro se. Derrick K McFarland, Office of the Attorney General of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, for ap-pellees.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Robert Jones appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2000). We have reviewed the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. *Jones v. Wannamaker,*No. CA-1238-2-18AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 31, 2000).* We dispense with oral argument, because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*

*

**The district court denied relief based partially on the interpretation of § 2254(d)(1) announced in *Green v. French,*143 F.3d 865 (4th Cir.1998). The Supreme Court overruled that aspect of *Green,*however, in *Williams v. Taylor,*529 U.S. 362, 120 S.Ct. 1495, 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000). We have reviewed Jones' appeal in light of *Williams*and conclude that the state post conviction court's decision was not contraiy to, and did not involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court. *Id.*at 409-10.
No. 56998.

#### Matchless Electric Company *v.*United States,

protest 191036-K/3814 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The official papers disclosed that the entry was liquidated on January 16, 1952, and the protest was not filed until March 18, 1952, more than 60 days after liquidation of the entry. The protest, being untimely within the provision of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, was therefore dismissed.
January

18, 2010

Subject: Meeting with Tom Carter, Calera Corporation Location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , Research Triangle Park, NC Date: January

15, 2010 Participants: Tom Carter, VP of Government Affairs, Calera Corp.

Keith Barnett, EPA Bill Neuffer, EPA Sharon Nizich, EPA Elineth Torres, EPA Mike Laney , RTI
Tom Carter, Calera Corporation, provided an overview of the Calera process and its potential applications to industrial processes. As described by Mr. Carter, the Calera process, Carbonate Mineralization via Aqueous Precipitation (CMAP) , converts CO2 from industrial flue gas streams to CO3 and combines it with minerals to form carbonate minerals, which can be used as aggregate, supplemental cementitious materials, and potentially cement. T he process has a capture rate for CO2 from flue gases of 70

- 90%. The process also captures 95

- 99% of SO2 in the exhaust gas stream. Calera operated a pilot plant in California and is currently ramping the plant to a demonstration level. The company is also working with several electric utility companies to develop demonstration level projects which can later be scaled up to full scale.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                                        
                       EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Three Months ended          Nine Months ended
                                            September 30                September 30
                                        1998           1997         1998             1997
                                      --------       -------      --------        --------
<S>                                   <C>            <C>          <C>             <C>
Net Earnings                          $ 24,243       $ 8,154      $ 28,451        $ 28,630
Weighted Average Number of
 Common Shares Outstanding                 947           947           947             947
                                      --------       -------      --------        --------
Net earnings per Common Share         $     26       $     8      $     30        $     30
                                      ========       =======      ========        ========
</TABLE>

The Company does not have a complex capital structure and therefore, only has
basic earnings per share.
No. 66302.

#### R. H. Macy Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/29199 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of log fires similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *S. P. Skinner Co., Inc.*(46 C.C.P.A. 105, C.A.D. 708), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 1781

In re: DAVID CAIN, JR.

,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 7:21

- cv

- 00338

- TTC

- RSB )

Submitted : September 22, 2022 Decided: September 26, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

David Cain, Jr. , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1781 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

David Cain, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has

unduly delayed in acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He seeks an order from this

court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s d ocket reveals

that the district court den ied Cain’s § 2241 petition shortly after he filed this mandamus

petition . Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Cain’s case, we deny

the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argu ment because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 22-1781 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 1 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 2 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 3 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 4 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 5 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 6 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 7 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 8 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 9 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 10 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 11 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 12 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 13 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 14 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 15 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 16 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 17 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 18 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 19 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 20 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 21 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4-2 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 22 of 22
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian R. Ervine,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of EvolvingSystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ BRIAN R. ERVINE                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian R. Ervine                                                          |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer |
| November 3, 2009                                                    |

 

 

This certificationis furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification willnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat we specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
# sec5_custodialact_2024

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2023-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCA - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2022
# C_2018381EN.01001902.xml

| 22.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — PH v Commission

(Case T-613/16) (1)

((Civil Service - Recruitment - Open competition - Notice of competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 - Decision to exclude the candidate from the competition - Family connection to a member of the selection board - Equal treatment))

(2018/C 381/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: PH (represented by: M. Cornacchia, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of 19 May 2016 confirming, in response to a request for review made by the applicant, the exclusion of the latter from the competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-43/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. (the  "Partnership")
for the  period  ended  September 29, 2006 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Kathleen Skero,
Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: November 8, 2006
______________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### Ronnie WELCH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Richard H. CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 00-6741.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 12, 2001.

Before KEITH, BATCHELDER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges.

Ronnie Welch, a Kentucky citizen, appeals pro se a district court order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Welch filed this complaint against an administrative law judge who had issued a decision in a workers’ compensation case which Welch disagreed with. He sought to have the decision overturned and to be awarded the compensation he had sought in that proceeding. The district court dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and this appeal followed.

Upon review, we conclude that the district court properly raised the issue of subject matter jurisdiction sua sponte, and, after finding that jurisdiction was lacking, dismissed the complaint. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(h)(3); *Franzel v. Kerr Mfg. Co.,*959 F.2d 628, 630 (6th Cir.1992). This court reviews dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction de novo. *Greater Detroit Resource Recovery Auth. v. United States EPA*916 F.2d 317, 319 (6th Cir.1990). Review of the complaint filed in this case reveals that the district court correctly found that Welch had failed to allege grounds for jurisdiction as required by Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). No federal question is apparent, and diversity jurisdiction is also lacking. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1331-32. An appeal from a state workers’ compensation claim does not lie in federal court.

Accordingly, the district court’s order is affirmed. Rule 34(j)(2)(C), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>          5
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000
       
<S>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      28,770
<SECURITIES>                                   359
<RECEIVABLES>                              118,848
<ALLOWANCES>                                (2,860)
<INVENTORY>                                 31,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           187,093
<PP&E>                                     353,940
<DEPRECIATION>                            (158,257)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             452,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       85,934
<BONDS>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    16,117
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                 329,481
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               452,123
<SALES>                                    351,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           351,326
<CGS>                                      236,842
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              236,842
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,319
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             32,277
<INCOME-TAX>                                10,680
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         21,386
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                21,386
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 1.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 1.31

        





</TABLE>
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Search for a Deposit

To search for a deposit, complete the following steps:

1. From the Deposit Processing tab, click Search Deposit. The Search Deposit page 

appears.

2. Enter the search criteria for the deposit you would like to view and click Search. The Search 

Results table appears.

Under Search Conditions, optional

• Select the Organization

• Select the OTC Endpoint

• Enter the ALC (Agency Location Code)

• Enter Prepared by details

• Enter the Voucher #

• Select the Deposit Status

• Enter Agency Use (Block 6) details

• Select the Deposit Type

• Enter the From and To Voucher Date

• Enter the From and To Deposit Date

• Enter the From and To Deposit Total

Voucher From date must be five years or less from the current date. Vouchers more 

than five years old are viewed from the Historical Reports menu.

Under Financial Institution Information, optional

• Enter the RTN (Routing Transit Number)

• Enter the DDA (Demand Deposit Account)

• Enter the CAN (CA$HLINK II Account Number)

• Enter the FRB Account Key (Federal Reserve Bank Account Key)

• Enter the FRB CCWU (Federal Reserve Bank Cost Center Work Unit)

Under User Defined Field Information, if applicable, optional

• Enter the Deposit UDF (User Defined Fields)

• Enter the Accounting Subtotal UDF details

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• User Defined Fields (UDFs) only display to users who have access to an 

organization that has previously defined UDFs. 

• UDFs appear at the bottom of the page. 

• Up to three UDFs can be displayed for Deposit and two for Accounting Subtotal.

3. Click the Voucher Number of the deposit whose details you would like to view as shown in 

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Search Results Table

• Deposit totals are not displayed for unconfirmed foreign check items for which Other

was selected as the country of deposit during deposit creation. 

• Click Download to save the search deposit results as an XML or CSV file. 

• Click Edit to modify the deposit draft. (Visible if a user has Deposit Preparer

privileges.)

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

• Click Print Deposit Ticket to print a formatted deposit ticket.

• Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

• Click View Voucher Event Log to view the history of the 

deposit voucher events. 

Application Tips

Application Tips

Additional Buttons
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. (the  "Partnership")
for the  period  ended  September 28, 2007 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Gary Carlin,
Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ GARY CARLIN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Gary Carlin *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: November 9, 2007
_____________________

*  Gary Carlin functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.