alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 13,739.

#### In re TALLMAN.

[2 Ben. 348; 1 N. B. R. 462 (Quarto, 122); 1 Am. Law T. Rep. Bankr. 122.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

April, 1868.

Bankruptcy — Fraudulent Debt — Discharge.

Where, in. bankruptcy proceedings before the register, one of the creditors offered evidence to show that his debt was fraudulently contracted by the bankrupt, *held,*that the evidence was immaterial.

[Cited in Re Rosenfield, Case No. 12,058; Re Wright, Id. 18,065.]

[See Case No. 13,740.]

[In the matter of Darius Tallman, a bankrupt.]

[Counsel for Joseph Hacker, one of the creditors, proposes to introduce witnesses to prove the nature of the transaction out of which his debt arose, and that the debt was contracted by fraud, for the purpose of showing that this debt cannot be discharged under these proceedings. James M. Smith, At-' torney for Joseph Hacker. April 1, 1868.

[The bankrupt, Darius Tallman, objects that such inquiry is irrelevant; that the question cannot arise in these proceedings; that such a debt is not discharged, and can be collected notwithstanding such discharge; and that such question can only arise when it is undertaken to collect such debt after the discharge is granted. Warren G. Brown, Attorney for Bankrupt.

[It is conceded that the debt referred to, and the fraud alleged by the creditor, was so contracted, and that the alleged fraud took place in the year 1864, and that the debt is in judgment. Warren G. Brown, Attorney for Bankrupt. James M. Smith, Attorney for Creditor. April 1, 1868.] 2

2

 [Prom 1 N. B. R. 462 (Quarto, 122).]

By

THE REGISTER:

[Southern District of New York, ss.: I, Isaac Dayton, one of the registers in said court of bankruptcy, do hereby certify that, In the course of the proceedings in said cause before me, the foregoing question arose before me pertinent to the said proceedings and was stated, and agreed to, by the counsel for the opposing parties, as hereinbefore set forth, and the said parties requested that the same should be certified to the judge for his opinion thereon. Dated 6th April, 1868.

[The thirty-third section of the bankrupt act [14 Stat. 533], declares “that no debt created by the fraud of the bankrupt shall be discharged under the act, but the debt may be proved and the dividend thereon shall be a payment on account of the said debt.” The fact that the debt was created by fraud does not therefore constitute a ground of opposition to the discharge of the bankrupt; and as the examination of the bankrupt is for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the bankrupt is entitled to a discharge under the act, evidence of fraud in the creation of the debt is not admissible.) 2

BLATGHFORD, District Judge.

The register is correct in his view. The clerk will certify this decision to the register, Isaac Dayton, Esq.

2

 [Prom 1 N. B. R. 462 (Quarto, 122).]
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10065 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Tamala Evette Jones,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 421

- 1

Before **King, Costa,** and **Ho,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Tamala Evette Jones has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Jones has filed responses . We have reviewed counsel’s

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 13, 2021
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-10065 Document: 00516011634 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/13/2021No. 21

- 10065

2 brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Jones ’s response s . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s
motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th**
**Cir. R**

**.** 42. 2. Jones’s motion for the appointment of counsel is **DENIED**

. See United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902

- 03 (5th Cir. 1998). Case: 21-10065 Document: 00516011634 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/13/2021
April 13, 1953

No. 57259.

protest 143496-K.

#### Naess, Mejlaender & Co., Inc., and Gurge & Co. *v.*United States,

Abstract-57010. Plaintiffs’ application for rehearing denied.
No. 60019.

#### F. C. Mackay et al. *v.*United States,

protests 174467-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 53483.

protests 127700-K, etc. (New York).

#### Inter Ocean Forwarding Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

By virtue of the decision in *Pramette Juvenille Furniture Company*v. *United States*(36 C. C. P. A. 61, C. A. D. 398), the protests were dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JAY C. CRESSMAN, et al : CIVIL ACTION

 vs. 

 

 

LINCARE HOLDINGS INC. : 02-2783 

 

 

 O R D E R

 

BEFORE HONORABLE MARVIN KATZ, 

 AND NOW, this 28th day of OCTOBER, 2002, it is ORDERED that 

this case is fixed for a CIVIL JURY TRIAL to commence on JANUARY 6, 2003 

at 10:00 AM before the HONORABLE MARVIN KATZ, in Courtroom 13-B, 13th floor, 

 U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT:

By: ________________________ _____________________________ 

 Elizabeth M. Purnell, MARVIN KATZ, S. J. 

 Courtroom Deputy Clerk

Faxed: 10/28/02

 G. J. Williams, Esq.

 C. J. Bloom, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-02783 Document 11 Filed 10/28/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-02783 Document 11 Filed 10/28/2002 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3870 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3870

     To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to expand 
  eligibility for certain financial assistance for the acquisition of 
            slip-on tanker units for wildland firefighting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 5, 2024

 Ms. Cortez Masto introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
     and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to expand 
  eligibility for certain financial assistance for the acquisition of 
            slip-on tanker units for wildland firefighting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Slip-on Tanks for Tribes Act of 
2024''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR ACQUISITION OF FIREFIGHTING SLIP-ON 
              TANKER UNITS.

    Section 40803(c)(5) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act 
(16 U.S.C. 6592(c)(5)) is amended by inserting ``and Indian Tribes'' 
after ``local governments''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 50398.

#### Protests 88500-K, etc., of Jordan Marsh Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2016475EN.01001101.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen (Germany) lodged on 16 September 2016 — Criminal proceedings against Pál Aranyosi

(Case C-496/16)

(2016/C 475/16)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Pál Aranyosi

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are Article 1(3), Article 5 and Article 6(1) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (1) of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States to be interpreted as meaning that the executing Member State, when taking a decision on extradition for the purposes of prosecution, must eliminate any real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment of the person sought, within the meaning of Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, attributable to the conditions of his detention only in the first prison in which that person will be imprisoned following his surrender to the issuing Member State? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are Article 1(3), Article 5 and Article 6(1) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA (1) of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States to be interpreted as meaning that the executing Member State, when taking a decision on extradition for the purposes of prosecution, must eliminate any real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment of the person sought, within the meaning of Article 4 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, attributable to the conditions of his detention only in the first prison in which that person will be imprisoned following his surrender to the issuing Member State?

1

| 2. | Must the executing State, when taking that decision, also eliminate any real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment of the person whose surrender is sought that may be attributable to the conditions of his detention in the place of his subsequent imprisonment in the event of conviction? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must the executing State, when taking that decision, also eliminate any real risk of inhuman or degrading treatment of the person whose surrender is sought that may be attributable to the conditions of his detention in the place of his subsequent imprisonment in the event of conviction?

| 3. | Must the executing State eliminate that risk for the person whose surrender is sought also in the event of possible relocations to other prisons? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Must the executing State eliminate that risk for the person whose surrender is sought also in the event of possible relocations to other prisons?

---

(1)  OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1.

1

---
No. 53517.

protest 143301-K (Bridgeport).

#### Stratford Monument Works *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400-the court dismissed the protest.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View and Print a Batch List Report

To view and print a Batch List report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Check Processing tab, select Batch Management. The Search Batch page 

appears.

2. Select or enter the batch search conditions you would like to view.

Under Batch Search Conditions, optional

• Select the OTC Endpoint you want to Edit a batch for by checking the under the 

Select column.

Under Created On Date, optional

• Enter the From and To date range.

• The From and To Created On Date must be entered in MM/DD/YYYY format.

• The Created On Date range cannot exceed 30 days. Additionally, if more than 1,000 

batches are created within 30 days, then only the most recent 1,000 batches appear.

• When running a search with the default From and To Created On Date range 

values, the search results include the most recent 30 days of batches that you have 

access to view. If more than 1,000 batches are created within the 30 days, then only 

the most recent 1,000 batches appear.

• When running a search without specifying any criteria (with the exception of the 

Batch ID field), the search results include the most recent 30 days of batches that 

you have access to view. If more than 1,000 batches are created within 30 days,

then only the most recent 1,000 batches appear.

o Enter the Batch ID, optional.

o Enter the Cashier ID, optional.

If the only search criteria entered is a valid Batch ID then only a single result appears 

regardless of other search criteria specified.

Under Batch Status, optional

o Select the Status you want to view by checking the Open or Closed box under 

the Select column.

3. Select Search. The View Batches page appears.

4. Select the Batch ID hyperlink. The Batch and Check Details page appears.

Application Tips

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

If a batch is in use and another user attempts to access the same batch, a Batch Lock 

message appears stating the batch is in use and he/she cannot access the batch.

5. Select Print Batch List. The Batch List Report preview page appears as shown in 

Figure 1.

Figure 1. Batch List Report

6. Under Export as, 

o Select PDF, Word or Excel

o Select Download

Or

o Select Print PDF Report

• Select Previous to return to the previous page.

Application Tip

Additional Button
No. 65473.

#### A. A. Food Products and Chas. H. Asche & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/29621, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiffs was -sustained.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 392 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that bonds used 

to finance professional stadiums are not treated as tax-exempt bonds. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2023 

Mr. LANKFORD (for himself and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure 

that bonds used to finance professional stadiums are 

not treated as tax-exempt bonds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Tax Subsidies for 

5 Stadiums Act of 2023’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FOR PROFESSIONAL STA7 DIUMS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 103(b) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

10 the following new paragraph: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 392 IS

1 ‘‘(4) PROFESSIONAL STADIUM BOND.—Any pro2 fessional stadium bond.’’. 

3 (b) PROFESSIONAL STADIUM BOND DEFINED.—Sec4 tion 103(c) of such Code is amended by adding at the end 

5 the following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(3) PROFESSIONAL STADIUM BOND.—The 

7 term ‘professional stadium bond’ means any bond 

8 issued as part of an issue any proceeds of which are 

9 used to finance or refinance capital expenditures al10 locable to a facility (or appurtenant real property) 

11 which, during at least 5 days during any calendar 

12 year, is used as a stadium or arena for professional 

13 sports exhibitions, games, or training.’’. 

14 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to bonds issued after the date of 

16 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

GEORGE GILMORE, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

PHILADELPHIA COURT OF COMMON 

PLEAS, PRESIDENT JUDGE SHEILA A. 

WOODS-SKIPPER, CHRISTOPHER 

THOMAS, DIRECTOR CMR/PPS, 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 93 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Review/Writ of 

Mandamus is DENIED, the Motion to Dismiss is DISMISSED AS MOOT, and the 

Prothonotary is DIRECTED to strike the name of the jurist from the caption. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
No. 51640.

#### Protest 47365-K of Supreme Tire & Rubber Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Print a Receipt From the Card Capture—Perform Card Transaction

Page

To print a paper receipt from Card Processing, the Card Capture—Perform Card Transaction 

page, complete the following steps:

1. Enter the pertinent card details to process a card payment.

2. Under Terminal Controls, click Print Receipt as shown in Figure 1. An Approved Receipt

prints for the approved transaction.

Figure 1. Card Processing Card Capture – Perform Card Transaction, Print Receipt

• Print Receipt remains enabled to allow you to print additional receipts.

• You have about 4-6 seconds to click Print Receipt.

• If Print Receipt is not clicked within the allotted time, it grays out. If a receipt is still 

needed, access the Card Transaction Query function.

Application Tips
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           APR-2-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                APR-2-1999
<CASH>                                          15,120
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  810,551
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,062
<INVENTORY>                                    926,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,766,825
<PP&E>                                       6,216,029
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,777,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,296,129
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,955,702
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,151,734
<OTHER-SE>                                   (649,542)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,296,129
<SALES>                                      4,334,477
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,335,287
<CGS>                                        3,214,927
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,214,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,120,387
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             137,766
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (137,793)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    15,031
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (152,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (152,824)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.66)


</TABLE>
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

ID

Simple or

Special Name Type Description Error Message 

83 SPECIAL

Limited Use of 439700 with Authority Type "B" and/or Fund Type "EP" Compound

The use of USSGL 439700 with Authority Type Code "B" and/or Fund Type "EP" is restricted to specific TAS.

This TAS is not permitted to report USS439700 with Authority Type Code "B" and/or Fund Type "EP". 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Summary

Bulletin No. 2017-01 VII VSR - 1
No. 63591.

protest 59/835 (New York).

#### Maurice A. Auerbach, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 9/25/18
No. 50007.

#### Protest 107114-K of Atlantic Refining Co. (Philadelphia).

*203Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From an examination of the record the court found nothing to correct. The protest was overruled.
p . 1



# PS L

Ma y 30 , 201 3 

### RECEIVE D

OPP T CBI C 201 3 JU N -l * A N S ' 3 8 CBI C Contro l Numbe r 

# 35451 0

VI A FEDERA L EXPRES S Documen t Contro l Offic e (7407M ) Offic e o f Pollutio n Preventio n an

d Toxic s Environmenta

l Protectio n Agenc

y 120 1 Constitutio n Avenue , NW Room316 6 EPA Eas

t Washington , D C 20460
Re : Peac

h Stat e Labs , Inc . Sectio n 4 Tes tRul e Applicatio n fo r Exemption , 4 0 CF R799.508

9 Docke tU) : EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-011 2 Dea r Sir/Madam : Pleas e accep t thi s lette r a s a n Peac h Stat e Labs , Inc/ s (PSL ) Applicatio n fo r Exemptio n fro mTestin g Requirement s fo r 2-Butenedioi c aci d (2E)- } di-C8-18-alky l ester s i n complianc e wit h 4 0 C.F.R
. 790. 5 an d 790.45
. Test Rul e Identification :
Test Substance :
Testing Requirements : Applicant : 40 C.F.R
. § 799.508 9 Chemica l testin g requirements fo r thir dgrou p o f hig h productio n volum

e chemical s (HPV3 ) 2-Butenedioi c aci d (2E)- , di-C8-18-a!ky l esters , CASRN 68610-90- 2 Al l (Al , A2 , A3 , A4 , A5 , B , CI , D , El , E2 , Fl ) Peac h Stat e Labs , Inc. , 18

0 Burlingto n Rd. , Rome , G A 30162 , 706-291-874 3 Peac h Stat e Labs , In c P.O
. Bo x 108 7 Rome , G A 30162-108

7 706-291-874

3 fax : 706-291-488

8Pag e 2 of 2

Contac t Person : Michae l S
. William s

Chie f Operating Office r Peac h Stat e Labs , Inc
. P.O
. Bo x 108

7 18 0 Burlingto n Rd Rome , G A 30162 706-291-874 3 PS L submit

s thi s applicatio n on the basi s tha t PS L i s arelativel y small compan y fo r whic h performanc e o f

th e requiredtestin g woul db e unduly burdensom

e an d expensiv e a s compare

d to othe r companie s tha

t ma y manufactur

e thi s substance
. PS L understands tha

t i f thi s applicatio n i s granted befor e th e reimbursemen

t perio d describe

d i n Sectio n 4(c)(3)(B ) o f

the Toxi c Substances Contro l Ac t expires , PS L mus

t pa y fai r an d equitable reimbursemen

t t o th e perso n o r persons who incurre d o

r share d i n th e cost s o f complyin g wit h the requiremen t t o submi t dat aan d upon whos e dat

athe grantin g o f PSL' s applicatio n wa

s based
. Pleas e d o no t hesitat e to contac

t m e wit h an y question s or

concerns regarding thi s request . Sincerely ,
Michae l S
. William s Chie f Operating Office r Peac h Stat e Labs , Inc
.

Peac h Stat e Labs , In c P.O
. Bo x 108 7 Rome , G A 30162-108

7 706-291-874

3 fax : 706-291-488

8