alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Danielle Lewis

- EPA request for sampling of carbon capture wastewater at Moun taineer

Ron, here is some additional information regarding th e carbon capture process at the AEP Mountaineer Plant.

We have confirmed that you would like us to collect sample s from the hose leading to the PVF bleed stream frac tank. You may also want us to collect samples from the fly gas condensed condensate (FGCC) tank discharge, however, this process water is not unique to the carbon capture process. This water is condensate from the flue gas stream as it is cooled from 80 to 40 F. It is relati vely "clean" water that is directed to the main plant co oling
tower to help provide cooling make-up water.

A flow diagram that illustrates each process flow stream in sufficient detail to allow you to determine if you want the FGCC tank to be sampled has been prepared and wil l be sent to TJ Finseth at ERG later today. The PVF bleed stream sampling location has also been indicated on the drawing. This drawing is considered to be "Confidential Business Information" for the purposes of this study and we request that it not be distributed o utside
of EPA or the agency contractors directly involved with this study.

The PVF bleed stream is not treated, but is hauled of f-site for disposal into deep injection wells. During o ur call, you asked why the waste water was injected rather than tre ated. Originally, this waste water was given to a farmer's coop for use as a fertilizer. However, we did n ot anticipate that the water would have high selenium levels and could be classified as "hazardous" (failed TCLP) . We also didn't anticipate that we would generate t he high volume of waste water. The farmer's coop will stil l accept the waste water, as the selenium levels do not prevent its beneficial reuse as a fertilizer, however, our legal staff have recommended that we discontinue this practice to reduce any future legal liabilities for AEP . Due to the short-term nature of this project, deep well injection by a third party is an effective method of han dling the waste water. Such disposal will not be used f or the planned commercial scale carbon capture and storage proje ct. For that installation, the waste water will be
treated to a solid phase for use as a fertilizer.

We are still scheduled to collect the EPA samples during the week of January 24th.

Tim 

### From: <twlohner@aep.com>

To: Jordan.Ronald@epamail.epa.gov

Date: 12/6/2010 2:45 PM Subject: EPA request for sampling of carbon capture wastewater at Mountainee r CC: Thomas.Finseth@erg.com

Attachments: Part.002 Page 1 of 1

5/7/2012 file://C:\Documents and Settings\DLewis\Local Settings\Temp\XP grpwise\4F97F9FDDOM

...
No. 49621.

#### Protests 953442-G, etc., of Swift & Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese similar to that passed upon in Abstracts 36724 and 38186, an allowance was made for the weight of the paper or foil, or both, in which- certain Gorgonzola cheese was wrapped.
# sec5_balsh_2022

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10Streamlined Balance Sheet - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10April 2022
No. P68/268.

protests 61/6467, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Standard Brands Paint Co., Inc., and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*1049Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consist of wooden doors similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 383, C.D. 2997), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6064** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. CHARLETTE DUFRAY JOHNSON, a/k/a Charlotte Johnson , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Wilmington

. W. Earl Britt, Senior District Judge. ( 7:10

- cr - 00093

- BR

- 1 )

Submitted : February 27, 2014 Decided: March 5 , 2014

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Charlette Dufray Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jason Harris Cowley, Assistant United States Attorney, Susan Beth Menzer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, fo r Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Charlette Dufray Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying without prejudice Johnson’s pro se motions to vacate her sentence * and for a hearing on th at motion. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (20 12 ), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (20 12 ); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 , 545

- 46 (1949).

“ A judgment in a criminal case becomes final after convict ion and imposition of sentence.” United States v. Hartwell , 448 F.3d 707, 712 (4th Cir. 2006). Although Johnson previously was convicted and twice sentenced, this court recently vacated her criminal judgment in part and remanded for resentencing. Because the resentencing hearing has not yet occurred, no final judgment has been entered in the district court. We conclude the order Johnson seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an a ppealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We deny as moot Johnson’s motion to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

* This motion was not brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012).3 contentions are adequately prese nted in t he materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 12

INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES    Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges    (dollars in thousands)

|                                                        |  | Fiscal Year Ended |       
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | ------
|
|Earnings from continuing operations before income taxes |  | $                 | 43,977
|Plus: Fixed charges(1)                                  |  |                   | 36,419
|Less: Capitalized interest                              |  |                   | (625  
|                                                        |  |                   |       
|Earnings available to cover fixed charges               |  | $                 | 79,771
|                                                        |  |                   |       
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                      |  |                   | 2.19  
|                                                        |  |                   |       

---

Fiscal Year EndedMarch 1,
2003

March 2,
2002

March 3,
2001

February 29,
2000

February 28,
1999Interest expense, gross

$
30,713

$
22,980

$
18,269

$
16,397

$
16,519Rentals (interest factor)


5,706


10,041


8,905


9,047


9,200Total fixed charges

$
36,419

$
33,021

$
27,174

$
25,444

$
25,719


---

QuickLinks
From: Khan, Mohammed

Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:26 PM Subject: DOE Publication of Notice of Publ ic Mtg and Availability of PreTSD

Dear Interested Parties:

I would like to inform you th at today the U.S. Department of Energy published in the Federal Register its notice of public meeting and availability of a preliminary technical support document for Energy Conservation Standards for Residential Water Heaters, Direct Heating Equipment, and Pool Heaters. Additionally, I would like to inform you that the preliminary TSD and other material that are referenced and indicated in the

notice to be available on the DOE website wi ll soon be available at the below URL. Please also note in order to allow for an ope n discussion and receive comments relevant to this standards activity, the U.S. Depart ment of Energy scheduled a public meeting which will be held on February 9, 2009, from 9 AM to 5 PM at the U.S. Department of Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 1E -245, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585.

Please feel free to contact me if you require additional information.

http://www1.eere.energy.gov/ buildings/appliance_standards/residential/water_po ol_heaters_nopm.html

Mohammed Khan Building Technologies Program (202) 586-7892 voice (202) 586-4617 fax
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 118 Filed 01/03/2005 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 118 Filed 01/03/2005 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 118 Filed 01/03/2005 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 118 Filed 01/03/2005 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 118 Filed 01/03/2005 Page 5 of 5
No. 52958.

#### Mamary Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 78121-K, etc. (New York).

*270Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and the issue herein are the same in all material respects as those presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SCOTT JOHNSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

THE NORMAN and EDITH HILL

TRUST, PAIMAN RAHBARIAN,

Defendants.

_____________________________/

CIV. S-04-0699-LKK-PAN

ORDER

This matter is before the court upon plaintiff’s motion for

default judgment. The matter was referred to the Honorable Peter

A. Nowinski, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. 636, et seq., and Local Rule 72-302. On January 20, 2006,

Judge Nowinski filed findings and recommendations which were

served on all parties. No objections to the findings and

recommendations have been filed.

////

Case 2:04-cv-00699-LKK -PAN Document 50 Filed 03/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations filed January 20, 2006, 

are adopted in full; 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment is

granted;

3. The clerk shall enter judgment in the form of an

injunction directing defendant Rahbarian to remove the

architectural barriers described in the magistrate judge’s

recommendations within 90 days from entry of judgment and for

damages in the amount of $4,000.00; and

4. Plaintiff may file a motion for reasonable attorney fees

within 30 days of entry of judgment.

DATED: _March 20, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00699-LKK -PAN Document 50 Filed 03/21/06 Page 2 of 2
Dvn eg yR esour.ce

J ,IL!LC 1500 Eastport Plaza Drive Collinsville, Illinois 62234 June 11, 2015 Mr. Christopher Beekman Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division
of Air Pollution Control P.O. Box 1049 Columbus,
Oh 43216

-1049 Re: Miami Fort Power Station,
ID No. 1431350093 MATS Rule Compliance Extension for Unit 6- Final Quarterly Status Update Dear Mr. Beekman: On December
12, 2013, Ohio EPA's Division
of Air Pollution Control (DAPC) approved

a request by Duke Energy Kentucky (DEK) toextend the Mercury and Air Taxies (MATS) Rule compliance date for Unit
6 atMiami Fort Power Station by 47 days, toJune
1, 2015. DAPC's approval directed DEK tosubmit quarterly status update reports regarding this extension within 15 days after the end of calendar quarters. Though DEK remains the ownerof Miami Fort Unit 6, responsibility

for its operation shifted from Duke Energy
to Dynegy on April 2, 2015. This final quarterly status update report

is provided
by Dynegy. During the second quarter
of 2015,DEK continued

toinclude Miami Fort Unit
6 asan eligible resource

in its Fixed Resource Requirement (FRR) plan tomeetits FRR capacity obligation, and offered

it ona day-ahead basis into the PJM energymarket until May 31, 2015. Consistent with the termsof DAPC's compliance extension, operation

of Miami Fort Unit
6 has ceased, effective June
1, 2015. Please contactmeat513-467-5885 (Chris.Osterbrink@Dynegy.com)

or Larry Waite at618-343- 7828 (Larry.Waite@Dynegy.com)

with any questions regarding this report

. Sincerely, **1CJ:~,u-~** Chris Osterbrink Managing Director, Plant Operations Miami Fort Power Station cc:Robert Hodanbosi, Ohio EPA, DAPC, Central Office Brad Miller, Southwest Ohio Air Quality Agency J. Michael Geers, Duke Energy
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                       TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Arthur T. Taylor,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: May 15, 2003                          By:      /s/ Arthur T. Taylor
                                                     --------------------
                                                     Arthur T. Taylor
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
Everly Jazi 

t{!Jt dkti IF Pb: 

Hello. My name is Everly Jazi. Starting from when I was four years old, I would sometimes feel out of 

breath and start wheezing, my rriom panicking and calling my pediatrician, who I remember had a 

Mickey Mouse watch like me. He didn't have much advice to give, just telling my mom to have me 

stand in front of freezer and breathe the cold air. But one night when I was nine, the freezer method 

didn't work. I started wheezing uncontrollably. My mom drove me to the emergency room of the 

children's hospital. I never painted my nails when I was little but I remember that the day before I 

had put sparkly nail polish on and when the nurse went to take the oxygen test with a pulse 

oximeter, she had to scratch off my nail polish to get an accurate reading of my finger. 

They put a face mask on me and turned the machine on. We also didn't have cable at my house so I 

was really excited to watch the newest "Sponge bob" on the hospital TV. The doctors explained that I 

had just had an asthma attack and showed my mom how to use my cool new nebulizer. 

My pediatrician prescribed many medications like Singulair and Advair. The medications didn't do 

that great because I still had to be hooked up to the nebulizer whenever I felt an attack coming on 

and sit on the couch watching one of the seven TV channels we had with a mask over my face. 

When I was in high school, I read articles about cases of asthma and allergies across the nation. The 

cities listed had a lot of coal nearby. Atlanta repeatedly made the lists of worst cities to live in with 

asthma. But I think wh•'t surprls•o:d me the most was that Daytcn, Ohio, where I was born and where I 

lived for ten years, always made the lists. To me, it was strange that such a random city would be 

picked out in national articles. 

I definitely don't have the most severe case of asthma in the nation. I haven't had an asthma attack in 

over five years, thanks in part to my inhaler that I carry everywhere. But, I do believe that living in a 

state that burns a lot of coal and is very polluted influenced my life. When thinking about your 

position on the issue, I would like you to consider the over 25 million Americans living with asthma, 

the 1.9 million asthma attacks that make up one-fourth of all emergency room visits, and $56 billion 

that the United States spends on asthma annually. I know you all have or know someone who has 

asthma and I'd like you to think of them. No one should have their health sacrificed for dirty energy. I 

support the Clean Power Plan so we can clean up our air and keep our children healthy. 

Thank you.
No. 76-5598.

#### Sayles *v.*McGuire, U. S. District Judge.

Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.
No. 46099.

#### Protests 988400-G, etc., of Miglioretti Bros. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# USSGL AcctngTransaction History
Case 0:04-cr-00029-JRT-FLN Document 173 Filed 07/09/09 Page 1 of 3
Case 0:04-cr-00029-JRT-FLN Document 173 Filed 07/09/09 Page 2 of 3
Case 0:04-cr-00029-JRT-FLN Document 173 Filed 07/09/09 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GLENN EDWARD MERRIFIELD, No. 2:04-cv-0488-MCE-PAN-P

Plaintiff, 

v. ORDER

KLU KLUX KLAN, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed

this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No.

262.

On March 2, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and

recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which

contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. 

///

Case 2:04-cv-00488-MCE -PAN Document 9 Filed 04/21/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and

recommendations.

A party appearing without counsel must notify the clerk and

all parties of any address change. L.R. 83-183(b). Absent such

notice, service of papers on the prior address is effective. 

L.R. 83-182(d).

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and

recommendations to be supported by the record and by the

magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 2, 2006,

are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: April 20, 2006

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00488-MCE -PAN Document 9 Filed 04/21/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 60032.

#### W. N. Proctor Company *v.*United States,

protests 257609-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Angora rabbit hair similar in all material respects to that the subject of *W. N. Proctor Company*v. *United States*(35 Cust. Ct. 89, C. D. 1727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 21
                            IONICS, INCORPORATED

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

                                                 

                                             State or Other Jurisdiction
        Name                                       of Incorporation     


Ionics Foreign Sales Corporation Limited             Jamaica

Global Water Services, S.A.                          Panama

Ionics Italba, S.p.A.                                Italy

Ionics Iberica, S.A.                                 Spain

Ionics Nederland B.V.                                The Netherlands

Ionics Ultrapure Water Corporation                   California

Ionics Securities Corporation                        Massachusetts

Ionics (U.K.) Limited                                United Kingdom

Ionics (Bermuda) Ltd.*                               Bermuda

Elite Chemicals Pty. Ltd.                            Australia

Eau et Industrie                                     France

Resources Conservation Co. International             Delaware

Apollo Ultrapure Water Systems, Inc.                 California

Aqua Design, Inc.*                                   California

Separation Technology, Inc.**                        Minnesota

Ionics (Korea) Ltd.                                  Delaware

Sievers Instruments, Inc.                            Colorado

*   The Registrant, either directly, through Aqua Design, Inc. or
    through Ionics (Bermuda) Ltd., wholly owns nine subsidiary
    corporations incorporated in various Caribbean jurisdictions.
    These subsidiary corporations own and operate, or operate and
    maintain, desalination plants for the supply of potable water
    to resorts, hotels and municipalities.

**  Owns a U.K. subsidiary, SeparaTech Limited.


95
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian R.Ervine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report ofEvolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition andresults of operations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ BRIAN R. ERVINE                               |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                              |
| Brian R. Ervine                                   |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
| May 10, 2004                                      |

 

 

----
No. 63626.

protest 309193-K (New York).

#### Rietmann Pilcer Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C.D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.