alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Honey - Final Estimates            NASSLog in or Sign Up to subscribe        

----

Frequency of Release:Other

----

Category:Animals and Animal Products:Bees and Honey

Keywords:honeyhoney and bee productsproduction economics

----

## Releases

            -  « Previous 
            -  Next » 
            -  1 
            -  2 

| Jun 25, 2019 | PDFTXTZIP | Jun 25, 2019: Honey - Final Estimates detailsx                Jun 25, 2019: Honey - Final EstimatesRelease datetime:Jun 25, 2019Close |
|--------------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact office name:National Agricultural Statistics Service

Contact email:nass@nass.usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001052636
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   876,300
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,949
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               892,249
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 892,249
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,949
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    850,000
<COMMON>                                        26,300
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   892,249
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,846
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 47,846
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             47,846
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,846
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 23-60554

Summary Calendar

____________

Jie Xu, 

Petitioner,

versus

Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General, 

Respondent.

______________________________

Petition for Review of an Order of the 

Board of Immigration Appeals

Agency No. A216 760 262

______________________________

Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Jie Xu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the 

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) upholding the 

immigration judge’s order of removal and denying sua sponte reopening. He 

argues that he was not allowed a fair opportunity to file his I-589 application 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 15, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 23-60554 Document: 59-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/15/2024
No. 23-60554

2

for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention 

Against Torture.

We review the BIA’s decision and consider the immigration judge’s 

decision only to the extent it influenced the BIA. Masih v. Mukasey, 536 F.3d 

370, 373 (5th Cir. 2008). The BIA reasoned that even if the immigration 

judge erred by not specifically warning Xu about abandonment of his I-589 

application and by finding that good cause for a continuance had not been 

shown, Xu failed to establish prejudice from any such errors because he had 

not shown that the outcome of his proceedings was materially affected.

Xu has not shown that the BIA erred in concluding that he failed to 

meet his burden of demonstrating prejudice. See Matter of Sibrun, 18 I.&N. 

Dec. 354, 356-57 (BIA 1983). He has not explained the basis of his claims for 

relief from removal and ultimately has failed to show why the outcome of his 

case would have been different had his proceedings continued. To the extent 

he argues that his right to due process was violated, the contention similarly 

is unavailing. See Santos-Alvarado v. Barr, 967 F.3d 428, 439 (5th Cir. 2020) 

(recognizing that an initial showing of substantial prejudice is required to 

prevail on a due process claim). Lastly, we lack jurisdiction to review Xu’s 

challenge to the BIA’s denial of sua sponte regulatory reopening.

The petition for review is DISMISSED in part for lack of 

jurisdiction and DENIED in all other respects.

Case: 23-60554 Document: 59-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/15/2024
**Exhibit
      32**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350**


**(As
      adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002)**




For
      this
      Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Life Partners Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending February 29, 2008 (the “Report”),
      the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company hereby certify that:




(i)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




(ii)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of and for the periods covered in the Report.




Dated:
      May 16, 2008





/s/ Brian D. PardoChief
                Executive Officer





/s/ David M. MartinChief
                Financial Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Life Partners Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by it and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




[This
      Section 906 certification accompanies the Report, but is not “filed” as part of
      the Report.]
Exhibit 32.2


                      Park City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                            Certification Pursuant To
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Dunlavy, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: October 12, 2004


/s/ William Dunlavy
-----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer





                  (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
(Reap. Dec. 8133)

#### F. W. Woolworth Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 807695/1-2.

(Decided June 24, 1952)

*Sharreüs, Hillis & Paley {Amos B. Sharrelts*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

JohnsoN, Judge:

Tbis appeal for reappraisement bas been submitted for decision upon tbe following stipulation of counsel for tbe parties hereto :

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, that the market value or the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the earthenware articles and smoking pipes covered by the Appeal to Reappraisement enumerated on schedule “A” hereto attached and made part hereof, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed, ready for shipment to the United States, was in each instance the appraised value less the amount added to meet advances made by the Appraiser in similar cases and that there is no foreign value.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED, that this appeal to reap-praisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts I find tbe export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe earthenware articles and smoking pipes bere involved, and that sucb value in eacb instance was tbe appraised value, less tbe amount added to meet advances made by tbe appraiser in similar cases.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. P68/232.

protest 67/844 (New York).

#### H. J. Ashe Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*1040Ford, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Torch Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein the court held that the flashlights and batteries were separate entities rather than an entirety and were separately dutiable, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Page 1 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

• GTAS bulk file format was updated: 

• Budget Object Class (BOC) – 4 characters 

• Disaster Emergency Fund Code (DEFC) – updated from 1 character to 3 characters

• Required for use beginning PD09 FY22, “FORMAT=B” must be in the header of bulk file

• https://fiscal.treasury.gov/files/gtas/bulk-file-format-new.pdf

• GTAS Kane Release 5.0 deployed on 2/22/2022

• Agency Wish List

• Financial Statements by Bureau for applicable agencies

• Providing financial statements within the User Interface

• Providing Prior Year comparison within the Reclassified Financial Statements Report

• Internal enhancements to Validation processing

• Quicker turnarounds for Validation exception requests

• ACB/PRC Module Updates

• Improved messaging and better usability 

• Future Release functionality through FY22:

• OMB Validation 122 Authoritative Interface, Improved Manual Adjustment functionality, Reports for proposed analytical 

edit failure research, G-Invoicing Data API Interface

GTAS Updates
1 

### NUMBER 13 - 15 - 00405 - CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

M I GUEL R IVAS , Appellant ,
v. T HE S TATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.

On appeal from the 319th District Court of Nueces County , Texas. 

## O R D E R
Before Justices Garza, Benavid es, and Lon g oria

Order Per Curia m
Appellant, Miguel Rivas, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his conviction in trial court cause number 13

- CR

- 3492

- G

. The trial court’s certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not hav e the right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); se e id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases from non

-2

appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system unhindered while eliminating, at an early stage, the time and e xpense associated with non

appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist. , 159 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State , 182 S.W.3d 906, 912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). Within thirty days of date of this no tice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Hon. Dason Roland , is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right t o appeal and/or advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within thirty days of this notice, iden tifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant has a right to appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610,
614

– 15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State , 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 200 3, no pet.) (certification f orm provided in appendix to appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the applicable case law, and any f actual allegations therein must be true and supported by the record. See Dears , 154 S.W.3d at 614

– 15; c f. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 10.1,
10.2.3 PER CURIAM

D o not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2( b). Delivered and filed the 8th day of September 2015

.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4179 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4179

       To extend and modify the lend-lease authority to Ukraine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             April 18, 2024

  Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Coons, and Mr. Scott of 
South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend and modify the lend-lease authority to Ukraine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease 
Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION OF LEND-LEASE AUTHORITY TO UKRAINE.

    Section 2 of the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022 
(Public Law 117-118; 136 Stat. 1184) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1), by striking ``fiscal years 2022 
        and 2023'' and inserting ``fiscal years 2022 through 2026'';
            (2) by redesignating subsection (c) as subsection (d); and
            (3) by inserting after subsection (b) the following:
    ``(c) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the use of the 
authority under subsection (a), the Secretary of Defense, in 
coordination with the Secretary of State, shall submit to Congress a 
report that includes--
            ``(1) a description of the defense articles loaned or 
        leased to the Government of Ukraine, or to the government of an 
        Eastern European country impacted by the Russian Federation's 
        invasion of Ukraine, under such authority; and
            ``(2) a strategy and timeline for recovery and return of 
        such defense articles.''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10(2)



                    NOTE EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT
         THIS NOTE EXTENSION AND MODIFICATION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered
into by and between JILCO INDUSTRIES, INC., a California corporation ("Payor")
and LEONARD M. ROSS, a California resident ("Payee").

         Payor and Payee do hereby mutually acknowledge and agree that Payor is
presently liable for the indebtedness represented by a certain promissory note
payable to Payee in the original principal amount of FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
($40,000.00) ("Note" herein), which has a present outstanding balance as of the
date hereof of FORTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($40,000.00) plus accrued interest.

         NOW, THEREFORE, FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION IN HAND
RECEIVED, the parties hereto, and each of them, do hereby agree that effective
as of the date hereof, the unpaid principal portion of the Note and all unpaid
accrued interest, if any, shall be all due and payable on December 31, 1991.

         Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to affect the obligation of
Payor regarding the payment of interest accrued on the Note through the date
hereof, or to affect any obligations of Payor under the Note, except as set
forth herein.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, and each of them, have executed
this Agreement as of the 7th day of November, 1989.

                                        JILCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
                                        a California corporation


                                        By /s/ Byron Wayne
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Byron Wayne, President

                                          "Payor"



                                          /s/ Leonard M. Ross
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Leonard M. Ross

                                          "Payee"
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4163 

To require a report on the United States supply of nitrocellulose. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

APRIL 18, 2024 

Mr. RISCH (for himself, Mr. COTTON, Mr. CRAPO, Mr. CASSIDY, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. DAINES, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. HAGERTY, Mrs. 

FISCHER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require a report on the United States supply of 

nitrocellulose. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ammunition Supply 

5 Chain Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPORT ON UNITED STATES SUPPLY OF NITRO7 CELLULOSE. 

8 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress makes the following find9 ings: 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4163 IS

1 (1) Congress remains concerned about the do2 mestic supply and production of nitrocellulose. 

3 (2) Any failure or supply shortage could restrict 

4 ammunition manufacturing for large and small cali5 bers, harming the commercial marketplace and plac6 ing the war fighters at risk. 

7 (b) REPORT.— 

8 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

9 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec10 retary of the Army shall submit to Congress a report 

11 on the United States supply chain for smokeless 

12 gunpowder, including nitrocellulose, nitroglycerin, 

13 and acid production, essential to ammunition manu14 facturing. 

15 (2) SCOPE.—The report required under para16 graph (1) should address the following topics: 

17 (A) Improving the sourcing of smokeless 

18 gunpowder necessary for the production of am19 munition, including nitrocellulose, nitroglycerin, 

20 and acid production. 

21 (B) Protecting against single points of fail22 ure across ammunition supply chain facilities, 

23 including primary and secondary locations. 

24 (C) Reducing the risk of disruptions 

25 caused by global demand for ammunition and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4163 IS

1 ammunition smokeless powder across commer2 cial and non-commercial markets. 

3 (D) Utilizing the private and commercial 

4 sector’s sourcing, manufacturing, and produc5 tion capacity and expertise to the greatest ex6 tent practicable to broaden points of production 

7 and private sector investment. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS