alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  Schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
ServiceMaster  quarterly  report to  shareholders  for the period ended June 30,
2000 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000  JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              47,477       53,934
<SECURITIES>                                        54,096       55,713
<RECEIVABLES>                                      676,978      618,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                        40,233       43,608
<INVENTORY>                                         98,981       82,586
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,099,489      984,584
<PP&E>                                             678,864      629,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                     357,795      320,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,148,534    3,809,179
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              929,658      845,811
<BONDS>                                          1,852,419    1,644,961
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0            0
<PREFERRED>                                              0            0
<COMMON>                                             3,057        3,115
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,245,422    1,190,249
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,148,534    3,809,179
<SALES>                                                  0            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,972,864    2,652,136
<CGS>                                                    0            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,316,934    2,068,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   418,631      448,217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  67,545       50,838
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    186,765       93,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                        78,383       40,055
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                108,382       53,644
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0            0
<CHANGES>                                                0            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        108,382      53,644
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0.36        0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.35        0.17



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6381
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus STEVE RUDOLPH GELIS, a/k/a Steve Randolph Gellis, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge. (CR-88-56-F) Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Steve Rudolph Gelis, Appellant Pro Se. Bruce Charles Johnson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his "All Writs Act 28 U.S.C. § 1651, Motion in de Novo Pursuant to New Law and Evidence." We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Gelis , No. CR-88-56-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE>

                                                                       EXHIBIT 12

                        INDIANA GAS COMPANY, INC.
                        AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

            COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                      (In Thousands, Except Ratios)

                                                   Year Ended December 31
                                  1999           1998        1997(1)      1996        1995
<S>                             <C>            <C>           <C>         <C>        <C>
Earnings:
 Net income                     $29,742        $26,825       $13,648     $36,121    $40,258
   Income taxes                  16,734         14,058         7,813      21,637     24,110
   Fixed charges (see below)     17,691         16,133        17,782      17,154     16,465
Total adjusted earnings         $64,167        $57,016       $39,243     $74,912    $80,833

Fixed charges:
 Total interest expense         $16,969        $15,802       $17,049     $16,200    $15,528
 Interest component of rents        722            331           733         954        937
Total fixed charges             $17,691        $16,133       $17,782     $17,154    $16,465

Ratio of earnings to fixed
  charges                           3.6            3.5           2.2         4.4        4.9


(1)Reflects the recording of restructuring costs in  1997
   (see Item 8, Note 3).  Indiana Gas' ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges for 1997 before restructuring costs was
   4.4.

</TABLE>
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

ID

Simple or

 Special Name Type Description Rule

51 SPECIAL

Backdated Transaction and Prior Year Adjustment Compound

If a transaction has been backdated to a previous fiscal year in CARS, then the Prior Year Adjustment for the transaction is B. The Backdated Transaction field on the SMAF will be Y (yes) if a backdated transaction has been processed. Fail 

Data Validations - Summary

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Bulletin No. 2024-01 DRAFT VII VSR - 1
Note to Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2009 - 0837

Based on an August 2, 2010 telephone call between EPA and Linde, EPA understands that cylinders labeled as NO x can contain NO, NO 2 or a combination of NO and NO 2 ; and cylinders containing an SO 2 and NO 2 combination may be possible .
Certification of Principal
Financial Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 and
Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427
 
 I, Tammy
Lynn McNabb, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Welwind Energy International
Corp.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation;
 
 c)
disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting the occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
and
 
 5. The
registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) all
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and
 
 b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
  Date:
      April 4, 2008
              
              /s/ Tammy
      Lynn McNabbTammy
      Lynn McNabb,
                Principal
      Financial Officer
17.02
EX-12
                              RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                          EXHIBIT 12


                                                             MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V
                                                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.
                                                               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                    (dollars in thousands)


                                             FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                   MARCH 30, 2001                           MARCH 31, 2000
                                         ----------------------------------       ----------------------------------
                                          MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH         MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH
                                            PREFERRED          PREFERRED             PREFERRED          PREFERRED
                                         CAPITAL TRUST V    FUNDING V, L.P.       CAPITAL TRUST V    FUNDING V, L.P.
                                         ---------------    ---------------       ---------------    ---------------
<S>                                        <C>                <C>                   <C>                <C>
Earnings                                    $ 15,949           $ 18,736              $ 15,949           $ 18,712
                                            ========           ========              ========           ========



Fixed charges                               $      -           $   -                 $      -           $      -

Preferred securities distribution
  requirements                                15,470             15,949                15,470             15,949
                                            --------           --------              --------           --------

Total combined fixed charges and
  preferred securities distributions        $ 15,470           $ 15,949              $ 15,470           $ 15,949
                                            ========           ========              ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
  fixed charges and preferred
  securities distributions                      1.03               1.17                  1.03               1.17




</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                             442
<SECURITIES>                                       226
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (28)
<INVENTORY>                                        416
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                           1,447
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (764)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,081
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          2,380
<COMMON>                                           785
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,307)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,081
<SALES>                                          6,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,326
<CGS>                                            5,289
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,784
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   206
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     5
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 173
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    158
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (56)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                102
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       102
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Transportation has adopted an unclassified presentation in the Statement of
Financial Condition.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Order Vacating Scheduling Order filed June 7, 2005

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

ALVIN GITTISRIBOONGUL

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MARIA G. CHAN, State Bar No. 192130

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 323-1940

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendant Rose

SF2004401281

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION 

GREGORY L. BROWN,

Plaintiff,

v.

D.L. RUNNELS, et al. ,

Defendants.

NO. 2:04-CV-0055 LKK GGH-P

ORDER VACATING

SCHEDULING ORDER FILED

JUNE 7, 2005

Defendant’s request for an order vacating the June 7, 2005 Court Scheduling Order

was considered by the Court, and good cause appearing, Defendant’s request is granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Order is vacated and the dates will be

reset, if necessary, at a later date.

DATED: 1/30/06 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States Magistrate Judge

br55.vac.wpd

Case 2:04-cv-00055-LKK -GGH Document 55 Filed 01/30/06 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,875
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,550
<INVENTORY>                                    132,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               262,900
<PP&E>                                          96,232
<DEPRECIATION>                                  37,769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 435,703
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           69,286
<BONDS>                                        333,232
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,203
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   435,703
<SALES>                                        240,692
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               240,692
<CGS>                                          174,874
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  174,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,511<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   504
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,546
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,943)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (532)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,075)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,075)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F1>Product development expenses.
<F2>The Company's shares are not publicly traded.
</FN>


</TABLE>
May 24, 1957

No. 60792.

Suit 4887.

#### John J. Coates Co. et al. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1768 reversed March 29, 1957. C. A. D. 643.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JAMIE B. MARRACCINI : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART : NO. 05-2871

 

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of February 2006, upon consideration of the parties’ crossmotions for summary judgment, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate

Judge Linda K. Caracappa, and plaintiff’s Exceptions to the Report and Recommendation of the

Magistrate Judge, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

4. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant, Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of

the Social Security Administration, and against plaintiff, Jamie B. Marraccini.

BY THE COURT:

s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr. 

THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J. 

Case 2:05-cv-02871-TON Document 13 Filed 02/10/06 Page 1 of 1
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&B&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&B&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2017
(Reap. Dec. 10985)

#### J. J. Murphy & Company *v.*United States

Entry No. 820248, etc.

(Decided May 19, 1965)

*Barnes, Rieharéson é Oolbwm*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of facts :

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule A, attached hereto 'and made a part hereof, consists of steel balls exported from Spain.

> 2. That the merchandise in question was entered after February 28, 1958 and appears in the Secretary’s final list, T.D. 54521.

> 3. That at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of Spain, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised unit value indicated on invoice in red ink less the discounts set forth in paragraph 4 of this stipulation, less 2%, plus export packing of 90 Pesetas per case; and there was no higher export value.

> *6714. That the discounts referred to in paragraph 3 of this stipulation are as follows:

> Entered Entered Entered Size during 1961 during 1962 during 1963

> DISCOUNT

> % 54% 38% 53%

> *%**58% 52% 58%

> 3/w 60% 38% 56%

> K 53% 45% 53%

> %2 76% 76% 74%

> *Viz*75% 74% 74%

> *n/32*None None 79%

> *n/s2*None None 80%

> **%2*None None 80%

> *t-Yus*None None 80%

> *%a*None None 80%

> None None 80%

> *%*None None 76%

> 34 None None 77%

> Ke None None 75%

> o. That the instant appeals are submitted for decision on this stipulation.

Upon tbe agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402a (c) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be tbe proper basis for determining the value of the steel balls, covered by tbe instant appeals for a reappraisement, and that such value is tbe appraised unit value indicated on the invoices in red ink, less discounts set forth in paragraph 4 of the above-quoted stipulation, less 2 percent, plus export packing of 90 pesetas per case.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 23.1


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements for the Ionics 1997 Stock Incentive Plan on Form S-8
(registration no. 333-29135); the 1979 Stock Option Plan on Form S-8
(registration nos. 333-05225, 33-54293, 33-41598, 33-5814, 33-14194, 2-
64255, 2-72936 and 2-82780); in the registration statement for the Ionics
Section 401(k) Stock Savings Plan on Form S-8 (registration no. 33-2092);
in the registration statement for the Ionics 1994 Restricted Stock Plan
(No. 33-59051); and in the registration statement for the Ionics 1986
Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors (registration no. 33-54400),
of our reports, dated February 17, 1998, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements and the financial statement schedule of Ionics,
Incorporated as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1997, which are included or
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                             /s/COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.



Boston, Massachusetts
March 27, 1998
















/214
# Fourth Court of App eals San Antonio, Texas

March 23, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00045

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.M.W. AND S.

- L.W., CHILDREN,

From the 438th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020

- PA

- 00394 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presid ing



### O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating appellant’s parental rights which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. Appellant’s brief was originally due on March 23, 2021, and appellant filed a motion requesting a twenty

- day extension of time.

After consideration, we GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant to file her brief by April 12, 2021

. Appellant is advised that further extensions of time will be disfavored

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 23rd day of March, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court