alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular"		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-12	&"Arial,Bold"VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2021
----

Appeal brought on 7 September 2006 by Beau against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 28 June 2006 in Case F-39/05, Beau v Commission

(Case T-252/06 P)

(2006/C 281/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Marie-Yolande Beau (Paris, France) (represented by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought by the appellant

Pleas in law and main arguments

In her appeal, the appellant alleges, firstly, that the Tribunal infringed Community law by an incorrect legal classification of certain facts and, secondly, that it committed a procedural error infringing her rights of the defence.

----
No. 55188.

#### Far Eastern Importex, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 165621-K, etc. (New York).

*351Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities Cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 11005)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 7247-H.

(Decided June 10, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. 160, etseq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> *7034. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 6.That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                        -------------------------------

           We consent to the incorporation by reference in the
           following registration statements and related
           prospectuses filed by Mallinckrodt Inc. under the
           Securities Act of 1933 of our report dated August 1,
           2000 with respect to the consolidated financial
           statements of Mallinckrodt Inc. included in this Annual
           Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2000:


                              Commission File No.
                           --------------------------


                            Form S-8, No.   2-65727
                            Form S-8, No.   2-80553
                            Form S-8, No.   2-90910
                            Form S-8, No.   2-94151
                            Form S-8, No.  33-10381
                            Form S-8, No.  33-32109
                            Form S-8, No.  33-40246
                            Form S-8, No.  33-43925
                            Form S-8, No. 333-34489
                            Form S-8, No. 333-38291
                            Form S-8, No. 333-38293
                            Form S-3, No. 333-42325
                            Form S-8, No. 333-85789
                            Form S-8, No. 333-89487
                            Form S-8, No. 333-91393
                            Form S-8, No. 333-92469




________________________
Ernst & Young LLP


St. Louis, Missouri
August 24, 2000
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3206]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[CGD01-07-016]


Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Housatonic River, Stratford, CT

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a 
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the 
Metro North Devon Bridge, across the Housatonic River, mile 3.9, at 
Stratford, Connecticut. Under this temporary deviation the draw may 
remain in the closed position from 8 a.m. through 11 p.m. on March 3, 
2007. This deviation is necessary to facilitate scheduled bridge 
maintenance.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 8 a.m. through 11 p.m. on March 
3, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this document are available for 
inspection or copying at the First Coast Guard District, Bridge Branch 
Office, One South Street, New York, New York, 10004, between 7 a.m. and 
3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone 
number is (212) 668-7165. The First Coast Guard District Bridge Branch 
Office maintains the public docket for this temporary deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First 
Coast Guard District, at (212) 668-7165.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Metro North Devon Bridge across the 
Housatonic River, mile 3.9, at Stratford, Connecticut, has a vertical 
clearance in the closed position of 19 feet at mean high water and 25 
feet at mean low water. The existing operating regulations are listed 
at 33 CFR 117.207(b).
    The bridge owner, Metro North, requested a temporary deviation to 
allow the bridge to remain in the closed position to facilitate 
scheduled bridge maintenance. Under this temporary deviation the Metro 
North Devon Bridge may remain in the closed position from 8 a.m. 
through 11 p.m. on March 3, 2007.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(c), this work will be performed 
with all due speed in order to return the bridge to normal operation as 
soon as possible.
    This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 
33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: February 15, 2007.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District.
 [FR Doc. E7-3206 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis E. PEYTON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-7212.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 30, 2001.

Decided June 15, 2001.

Cheryl Johns Sturm, Chadds Ford, PA, for appellant. Brian Huseman, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for appellee.

Before MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Louis E. Peyton seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error with respect to most of Peyton’s claims.* However, we note that Peyton’s affidavit successfully created a genuine issue of material fact with respect to counsel’s advice regarding the propriety of a guilty plea. *See Strickland v. Washington,*466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984). The district court erred in dismissing this claim without a hearing. Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings, Rule 8; *Raines v. United States,*423 F.2d 526, 529 (4th Cir.1970). Accordingly, although we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court with respect to all other claims, we vacate the portion of the district court’s order dismissing Peyton’s claim relating to the sufficiency of counsel’s advice regarding a guilty plea. We remand for further proceedings not inconsistent with this holding. We grant Peyton’s motion to file a supplemental brief and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*146
      *AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED.*

We have considered and rejected the possibility of reversible error in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in *Apprendi v. New Jersey,*530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). *See United States v. White,*238 F.3d 537, 542 (4th Cir.2001); *United States v. Kinter,*235 F.3d 192, 201 (4th Cir.2000).
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS R. ELLINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0666 DFL KJM P

vs.

E.S. ALAMEIDA, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner who is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Plaintiff

seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 

On December 12, 2005, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the

complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant Exum was returned unserved because

"unable to locate." Plaintiff must provide additional information to serve these defendants. 

Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through discovery, the California Public Records

Act, Calif. Gov't Code § 6250, et seq., or other means available to plaintiff. If access to the

required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may seek judicial intervention.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one USM-285 forms,

along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the amended complaint filed December 13, 2004;

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 79 Filed 04/13/06 Page 1 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

2. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and

submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following

documents:

a. One completed USM-285 form for defendant Exum; 

b. Two copies of the endorsed complaint filed December 13, 2004; and

c. One completed summons form (if not previously provided) 

or show good cause why he cannot provide such information.

DATED: April 12, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

elli0666.8e

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 79 Filed 04/13/06 Page 2 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS R. ELLINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0666 DFL KJM P

vs.

E.S. ALAMEIDA, et al., NOTICE OF SUBMISSION

Defendants. OF DOCUMENTS

 /

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's

order filed :

 One completed summons form

 One completed USM-285 forms

 Two copies of the December 13, 2004 

 Amended Complaint

DATED: 

 

Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 79 Filed 04/13/06 Page 3 of 3
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50233 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ADAN FLORES-GONZALES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:05-CR-2095-ALL

-------------------- Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Adan FloresGonzales raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
March 31, 1948

No. 52253.

Suit 4564.

#### United States *v.*Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al.

Abstract 51351 affirmed January 27, 1948. C. A. D. 381.
Brian Punch June 28, 2015
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

5515 Debit Voucher Report

To view a 5515 Debit Voucher report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Reports tab, click Deposit Processing Reports. The View Reports page 

appears. 

2. Under Business Reports, click 5515 Debit Voucher Report. The 5515 Debit Voucher 

parameters page appears.

3. Enter the search criteria for the report you would like to view.

Under Report Filters,

• Select a From and To Start Date range

• Click Yes or No to Include Subordinate OTC Endpoints.

• The From and To Start Date range is searchable for a duration of up to 45 days. 

Data for the report is available for a duration of one year.

• Click the Yes option to generate a report that contains data for the selected OTC 

Endpoint as well as all of the lower level OTC Endpoints. Click the No option to 

generate a report that contains data only for the selected OTC Endpoint.

• CHK denotes a check capture OTC Endpoint; TGA denotes a deposit processing 

OTC Endpoint; M denotes a mapped accounting code; an open lock denotes 

access permission; and a closed lock denotes no access permission.

4. Click an OTC Endpoint to initiate the report. The 5515 Debit Voucher preview page appears

as shown in Figure 1.

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Figure 1: 5515 Debit Voucher Report Preview Page

A 5515 Debit Voucher report will not generate for any day that is deemed a holiday 

during Monday-Friday hours.

5. Under Export as, 

• Select PDF, Excel or Word format

• Click Download

Or

• Click Print PDF Report

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

Application Tip

Additional Button
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

Line 

No.

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Begin/ 

End

Cust/ 

Noncust

Reporting 

Type Code

Addl. 

Info.

7

7 137400 Criminal Restitution Receivable E S E/U 2

7 137400 Criminal Restitution Receivable B S E/U 2

7 137900 Allowance for Loss on Criminal Restitution Receivable E S E/U 2

7 137900 Allowance for Loss on Criminal Restitution Receivable B S E/U 2

8

9

9 137400 Criminal Restitution Receivable E S E/U 2

9 137400 Criminal Restitution Receivable B S E/U 2

9 137900 Allowance for Loss on Criminal Restitution Receivable E S E/U 2

9 137900 Allowance for Loss on Criminal Restitution Receivable B S E/U 2

10

Section V

USSGL Crosswalk - Statement of Custodial Activity

Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

Total Custodial Revenue

This line is calculated. Equals sum of lines 8 through 9.

Miscellaneous

Total Cash Collections

This line is calculated. Equals sum of lines 1 through 7.

Accrual Adjustments (+/-)

Bulletin No. 2021-20 Draft

August 2021 IRC Meeting
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1432 

To prevent the Federal Aviation Administration’s Aircraft Registry Office 

from closing during a Government shutdown. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 26, 2017 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. MORAN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To prevent the Federal Aviation Administration’s Aircraft 

Registry Office from closing during a Government shutdown. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AIRCRAFT REGISTRY OFFICE. 

4 The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Adminis5 tration shall designate employees at the Aircraft Registry 

6 Office in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, as excepted employ7 ees in the event of a shutdown or emergency furlough to 

8 ensure that the office remains open for the duration of 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1432 IS

1 the lapse in Federal Government appropriations to the 

2 Federal Aviation Administration. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
# sec6_rbalsh_2019

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RBS - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2019
AO 247 (Rev. 11/11) Order Regarding Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) Page 1 of 2 (Page 2 Not for Public Disclosure) 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

for the 

Eastern District of California

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

v. 

JUAN PABLO VELAZQUEZ 

Case No: 2:04CR00388-06 

USM No: 15393-097 

Date of Original Judgment: 05/17/2007 

Date of Previous Amended Judgment: David Porter, Assistant Federal Defender 

(Use Date of Last Amended Judgment if Any) Defendant’s Attorney

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR SENTENCE REDUCTION 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

 Upon motion of the defendant the Director of the Bureau of Prisons the court under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in the term of imprisonment imposed based on a guideline sentencing range that has 

subsequently been lowered and made retroactive by the United States Sentencing Commission pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 994(u), and having considered such motion, and taking into account the policy statement set forth at USSG §1B1.10 

and the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), to the extent that they are applicable, 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is: 

DENIED. GRANTED and the defendant’s previously imposed sentence of imprisonment (as reflected in

the last judgment issued) of 135 months is reduced to 120 months . 

(Complete Parts I and II of Page 2 when motion is granted)

Except as otherwise provided, all provisions of the judgment dated 05/29/2007 shall remain in effect. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Order Date: 03/04/2015 ___________________ _____________________________________________________ 

 Judge’s signature

Effective Date: 11/1/2015 MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE ___________________ _____________________________________________________ (if different from order date) Printed name and title

 

Case 2:04-cr-00388-MCE Document 319 Filed 03/04/15 Page 1 of 1
No. 52246.

protest 102089-K (New York).

#### Louis Meyers & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of cotton fabric the same in all material respects as the fabric of which the gloves the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333) were made. The claim at 35 percent under paragraph 914, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
Before the First Division,

September 18, 1951

No. 55882.

protests 144011-K, etc. (New York).

#### Paramount Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
TABLE 3. Shady Hills Expansion: Proposed CO2e emission limits - per Turbine

Gas-fired operations

Unit load

Output, MW 

(gross)

Heat Rate, 

Btu/kWh (LHV, 

gross)

Heat Rate, 

Btu/kWh (HHV, 

gross) operating hours %

 Annual operating 

hours 

Generation, 

MWh/yr

lb/mmBtu (HHV 

basis) lb/hr lb/yr lb/MWh

100% 218 8,826 9,797 50% 1,445 314,835 119 254,040 367,088,173 1,166

50% 109 11,265 12,504 50% 1,445 157,417 119 162,120 234,264,066 1,488

Totals 472,252 601,352,239 1,273

Design margin 5.0%

Performance degradation margin 3.0%

 1,377

Proposed GHG limit on NG 

Normal Operations 12-Month Rolling Average lb/MWh at ISO 1,377

Start-up and Shut-down 12-Month Rolling Average Short tons per SU-SD event 21

Oil-fired operations

Unit load

Output, MW 

(gross)

Heat Rate, 

Btu/kWh (LHV, 

gross)

Heat Rate, 

Btu/kWh (HHV, 

gross) operating hours %

 Annual operating 

hours 

Generation, 

MWh/yr

lb/mmBtu (HHV 

basis) lb/hr lb/yr lb/MWh

100% 223 9,509 10,175 50% 250 55,658 163 368,883 92,220,787 1,657

50% 111 11,670 12,487 50% 250 27,829 163 226,358 56,589,621 2,033

Totals 83,487 148,810,408 1,782

Design margin 5.0%

Performance degradation margin 3.0%

 1,928

Proposed GHG limit on ULSD n)

Normal Operations 12-Month Rolling Average lb/MWh at ISO 1,928

Start-up and Shut-down 12-Month Rolling Average Short tons per SU-SD event 28

Notes:

1

2 CO2e - includes CO2, N2O, and CH4 and is based on 40 CFR Part 75 and Part 98 factors.

3 ISO = 59 deg. F., 60% relative humidity

4 Assumes 5% margin for design basis and 3% margin for degradation between major overhauls and the life of unit. 

5 CO2e lb/MMBtu Emission Factors based on Table 1. CO2e = CO2 + (21 x CH4) + (310 x N2O)

6 Startup Shutdown Emission based on CO2e Emission Factor and Estimated Fuel Consumption fer event: 338 MMBtu/event, and 339 

MMBtu/event, for Natural Gas and ULSD, respectively, and 119 lb CO2e/MMBtu and 163 lb CO2e/MMBtu, 

respectively for natural gas ans ULSD, respectively. 

Source: EFS, 2012

CO2e Emissions

CO2e Emissions

The above GHG limits take into consideration a number of operating, design and maintenance factors typical of combustion turbine generating facilities. The limits consider (a) 

operation across the range from minimum load to full load output, which is important for flexible, quick-starting resources under a utility's dispatch control; (b) design 

standards typical of construction contracts and equipment manufacturer’s supply contracts, which contain commercial terms for minimum performance test acceptance 

criteria; and (c) typical performance degradation of combustion turbines between major overhauls and the life of the equipment even with implementation of best 

maintenance practices.