alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry Paul PATRON, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-4189.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 27, 2001.

Before SEYMOUR, McKAY, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

McKAY, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously to honor the parties’ request for a decision on the briefs without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(f). The case is therefore submitted without oral argument.

Defendant, the driver of a car containing 2.2 kilograms of methamphetamine, appeals his sentence, challenging the trial *784court’s refusal to depart downward for minimal participation in a drug distribution scheme, or, in the alternative, to depart downward for minor participation. He likewise challenges the court’s refusal to depart downward for aberrant behavior.

The trial court’s finding that Defendant presented no evidence from which to compare his level of participation is not clearly erroneous. Courier status, standing alone, does not mandate reduction for either minimal or minor participation. *United States v. Ballard,*16 F.3d 1110, 1115 (10th Cir.1994).

The trial court clearly recognized its discretion to depart for aberrant behavior. It concluded that the facts did not support such a departure. It is settled that, absent an erroneous legal conclusion that it lacked discretion, the trial court’s refusal to depart is not subject to review on appeal. *United States v. Pearson,*203 F.3d 1243, 1276 (10th Cir.2000).

Finding no error, we AFFIRM Defendant’s conviction and sentence.

*

 This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir.R. 36.3.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/5/17
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENITO JULIAN LUNA,

Petitioner, NO. CIV S-04-0627 FCD GGH P

vs. ORDER

SCOTT KERNAN,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner’s former appointed counsel has requested $14,402.52 in attorneys’ fees. 

This case was unduly delayed by petitioner’s counsel during the exhaustion process and/or the

period after exhaustion but before re-commencement of the action in federal court, to the point

that when the amended petition was filed, the issue of the expiration of the statute of limitations

was raised sua sponte by the undersigned. That issue remains pending. Until the action has been

adjudicated, the undersigned declines to award attorneys’ fees. Should the action not be

dismissed on limitations’ grounds, the undersigned will reconsider this order.

DATED: August 2, 2011

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

luna0627.ord

1

Case 2:04-cv-00627-MCE-GGH Document 19 Filed 08/02/11 Page 1 of 1
No. 64068.

protest 59/21094 (New York).

#### Horrockses (U.S.A.), Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                                        0000052234
<NAME>                                       Bull & Bear Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         747,444
<SECURITIES>                                 1,176,547
<RECEIVABLES>                                  412,628
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,626,331
<PP&E>                                       1,452,738
<DEPRECIATION>                                 776,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,273,110
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          333,131
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,701
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,904,185
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,273,110
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,417,012
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,710,289
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (293,277)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,248
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (320,525)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.22)



</TABLE>
# sec6_rsnc_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSNC - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2019
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 10811]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Illinois (FEMA-1681-DR), dated February 9, 2007. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storm. *Incident Period:*
                         November 30, 2006 through December 1, 2006. *Effective Date:*
                         February 9, 2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         April 10, 2007.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
                        ( print page 8245)
                        Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, US Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on February 9, 2007, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Bond, Calhoun, Christian, De Witt, Fayette, Jersey, Logan, Macon, Macoupin, Madison, Mclean, Monroe, Montgomery, Piatt, Saint Clair, Sangamon, Shelby, Woodford. The Interest Rates are: PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is: 10811. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Roger B. Garland, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E7-3086 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
1.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARK JACKSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

ROHM & HAAS COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 05-4988

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2009, for the reasons stated in the

accompanying opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s “Motion to Vacate the

Reference of the Instant Matter to Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell” (Docket No. 196) is

DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Louis H. Pollak, J. 

Pollak, J.

Case 2:05-cv-04988-LP Document 248-1 Filed 03/19/09 Page 1 of 1
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1558 

To amend section 203 of Public Law 94–305 to ensure proper authority 

for the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2017 

Mr. RISCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To amend section 203 of Public Law 94–305 to ensure 

proper authority for the Office of Advocacy of the Small 

Business Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Advocacy Empower5 ment Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL POWERS OF THE CHIEF COUNSEL FOR 

7 ADVOCACY. 

8 (a) CHIEF COUNSEL AUTHORITY.—Section 203(a) of 

9 Public Law 94–305 (15 U.S.C. 634c(a)) is amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1558 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting a semicolon; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(7) issue, modify, or amend rules governing 

7 compliance by agencies with chapter 6 of title 5, 

8 United States Code, after opportunity for notice and 

9 comment under section 553 of title 5, United States 

10 Code; and 

11 ‘‘(8) authorize an agency to issue such supple12 mental rules governing compliance with chapter 6 of 

13 title 5, United States Code, as the Chief Counsel 

14 may approve, and ensure that the supplemental 

15 rules comply with such chapter 6 and with the notice 

16 and comment process under section 553 of title 5, 

17 United States Code.’’. 

18 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—On and after the date that 

19 is 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the 

20 Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Admin21 istration may exercise the authority under paragraphs (7) 

22 and (8) of section 203(a) of Public Law 94–305 (15 

23 U.S.C. 634c(a)), as added by subsection (a). 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View Card Terminal Configuration

To view card terminal configuration, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, select Manage Card Processing>Terminal 

Configuration>View. 

2. The Card Terminal Configuration View page appears, as shown in Figure 1.

3. Select Return Home to return to the home page. 

Figure 1: Card Terminal Configuration View
19.01 View a Check Processing Report
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

View and Print an Item Detail Report

To view and print an Item Detail report, complete the following steps:

1. From the Check Processing tab, select Batch Management. The Search Batch page 

appears.

2. Select or enter the batch search conditions you would like to view.

Under Batch Search Conditions, optional

• Select the OTC Endpoint you want to Edit a batch for by checking the under the 

Select column.

Under Created On Date, optional

• Enter the From and To date range.

• The From and To Created On Date must be entered in MM/DD/YYYY format.

• The Created On Date range cannot exceed 30 days. Additionally, if more than 1,000 

batches are created within 30 days, then only the most recent 1,000 batches appear.

• When running a search with the default From and To Created On Date range 

values, the search results include the most recent 30 days of batches that you have 

access to view. If more than 1,000 batches are created within the 30 days, then only 

the most recent 1,000 batches appear.

• When running a search without specifying any criteria (with the exception of the 

Batch ID field), the search results include the most recent 30 days of batches that 

you have access to view. If more than 1,000 batches are created within 30 days,

then only the most recent 1,000 batches appear.

o Enter the Batch ID, optional.

o Enter the Cashier ID, optional.

If the only search criteria entered is a valid Batch ID then only a single result appears 

regardless of other search criteria specified.

Under Batch Status, optional

o Select the Status you want to view by checking the Open or Closed box under 

the Select column.

3. Select Search. The View Batches page appears.

4. Select the Batch ID hyperlink. The Batch and Item Details page appears.

Application Tips

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

5. Select the Item ID of each scanned check. An image of the check and details of the check 

appear in the window below. 

6. Select Print Item. The Item Detail Report preview page appears as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Item Detail Report

7. Under Export as, 

o Select PDF, Word or Excel

o Select Download

Or

o Select Print PDF Report

• Select Previous to return to the previous page.

Additional Button
Accordingly, petitioner has not met his burden of demonstrating that our 

intervention is warranted, Pan, 120 Nev. at 228, 88 P.3d at 844, and we 

therefore deny the petition. NRAP 21(b)(1). 

It is so ORDERED. 

Gibbons 

cc: Jerry L.O. 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(0) 1947A ate°
# C_2017221EN.01002102.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Mühlbauer Technology v EUIPO (Magicrown)

(Case T-218/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Magicrown - Absolute grounds for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 221/28)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mühlbauer Technology GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2016 (Case R 1213/2015-4) concerning and application for registration of word sign Magicrown as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mühlbauer Technology GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mühlbauer Technology GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: May 14, 2009
_____________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARIUS GAINES,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0018 FCD GGH P

vs.

DARRELL G. ADAMS, et al.,

Respondents. ORDER

 /

The court hereby orders preparation of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing in

the above-captioned case which was held on July 26, 2005 and August 2, 2005. Pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2250, the Clerk shall then supply a copy of the transcript to petitioner’s counsel, free of

charge, forthwith.

DATED: 9/7/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:035

gain0018.trs

Case 2:04-cv-00018-FCD-GGH Document 45 Filed 09/08/05 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)


I, Gregory J. Halpern, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal
executive officer) of Circle Group Holdings, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certifies
that to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

             /s/ Gregory J. Halpern
             ---------------------------
             Name: Gregory J. Halpern
             Date: August 14, 2003
Order filed, October 08, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00591-CR

____________

MOHAMMAD SAEED ALZAHRANI, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Crim Ct at Law No 7

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1905659

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due September 15, 2014. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Sandra Powell, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed April 17, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D24-0232

Lower Tribunal No. F15-4909

________________

John Latham,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Zachary James, Judge.

John Latham, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.853(b) (requiring that a motion for 

postconviction DNA testing contain, inter alia: a statement that the evidence 

was not previously tested for DNA, that the results of previous DNA testing 

were inconclusive and that subsequent scientific developments in DNA 

testing techniques likely would produce a definitive result establishing that 

the movant is not the person who committed the crime; a statement that the 

movant is innocent and how the DNA testing requested by the motion will 

exonerate the movant of the crime for which the movant was sentenced, or 

a statement how the DNA testing will mitigate the sentence received by the 

movant for that crime; and a statement that identification of the movant is a 

genuinely disputed issue in the case and why it is an issue or an explanation 

of how the DNA evidence would either exonerate the defendant or mitigate 

the sentence that the movant received). See also Bates v. State, 3 So. 3d 

1091, 1098 (Fla. 2009) (“[A] defendant's motion must explain how the DNA 

testing requested will exonerate the defendant or mitigate the defendant's 

sentence. A defendant's motion ‘is facially sufficient with regard to the 

exoneration issue if the alleged facts demonstrate that there is a reasonable 

probability that the defendant would have been acquitted if the DNA evidence 

had been admitted at trial.’ Knighten v. State, 829 So. 2d 249, 252 (Fla. 2d 

DCA 2002). ‘The clear requirement of [the] provisions [of rule 3.853] is that 
3

a movant . . . must lay out with specificity how the DNA testing of each item 

requested to be tested would give rise to a reasonable probability of acquittal 

or a lesser sentence.’ Hitchcock v. State, 866 So. 2d 23, 27 (Fla. 2004). 

Further, ‘the movant must demonstrate the nexus between the potential 

results of DNA testing on each piece of evidence and the issues in the case.’

Id.”) (emphasis added).