alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## State of N ew York Su p reme Cou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: February 5, 2015 1 06145

________________________________ THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER TERRANCE F. NESBITT, Appellant.

________________________________ Calendar Date: December 2, 2014 Before: Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________ Jay L. Wilber, Public Defender, Binghamton (Michael A. Vargha of counsel), for appellant. Gerald F. Mollen, District Attorney, Binghamton (Joann Rose Parry of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Cawley Jr., J.), rendered May 10, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he waived his right to appeal and was to be sentenced as a second felony offender to 21⁄2 years in prison, to be followed by one year of postrelease supervision. At defendant's request, County Court adjourned the date of sentencing to allow defendant time to attend his son's birthday party. The court, however, admonished defendant that he was required to appear in court at 9:30 a.m. on March 5, 2013 for sentencing and that, if he did not, the court-2- 106145

could impose a sentence greater than the agreed-upon sentence. Defendant failed to appear in court on the sentencing date at 9:30 a.m., but showed up at approximately 1:00 p.m. County Court postponed sentencing to consider whether the sentence should be enhanced, and the matter was adjourned further as a result of defendant's motion to withdraw his plea. County Court denied the motion and ultimately sentenced defendant to three years in prison to be followed by two years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals. Defendant asserts that County Court abused its discretion in imposing the enhanced sentence. We disagree. County Court went out of its way to accommodate defendant's request to have sentencing adjourned so that he could attend his son's birthday party and even gave defendant an extra day so that he would not have to return on the date of the party. The court specifically warned him of the consequences of failing to appear, including the potentially longer sentence he faced, and indicated that bad weather or other such issues were not legitimate excuses. Nevertheless, defendant failed to appear at the required time and, when he finally came to court, claimed to have had transportation problems. Under the circumstances presented here, we cannot conclude that County Court abused its discretion in imposing an enhanced sentence (see People v Goodman, 79 AD3d 1285, 1286 [2010]; People v Baez, 67 AD3d 1204 [2009], lv denied 14 NY3d 797 [2010]). Lahtinen, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ., concur.-3- 106145

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
No. 48471.

#### Protests 53238-K, etc., of Butler Bros. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Interra Financial Incorporated's December 31, 1996 Form 10-K and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          49,387
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,313,572
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             81,631
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0<F1>
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            288,824
<PP&E>                                          32,946
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,827,425
<SHORT-TERM>                                    25,000
<PAYABLES>                                   1,246,848
<REPOS-SOLD>                                    57,967
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0<F2>
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              58,805
<LONG-TERM>                                     27,290
<COMMON>                                         1,522
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     274,364
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,827,425
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              169,040
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           110,551
<COMMISSIONS>                                  223,084
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                  111,391
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   35,890<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,560
<COMPENSATION>                                 385,905 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 87,402
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      56,811
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,811
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     4.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     4.39
<FN>
<F1>Included in receivables
<F2>Included in payables
<F3>Includes fees from Asset Management only
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
(Part 2SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2020 ReportingSection I) (U.S. Standard General LedgerChart of Accounts) (Account Number) (Normal Balance) (Title)

 (Bulletin No. 2020-10) (I CA - 10) (March 2020)
Exhibit
32.01
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Welwind Energy International Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Tammy-Lynn McNabb, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
   (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/
      Tammy-Lynn McNabbBy:
      Tammy-Lynn McNabbChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDated:
      November 14, 2008
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   1
As one of the very few US manufacturers of R- 22, we at MDA Manufacturing, Inc support action to restore

Production Allowance allocation to 38 percent of baseline in 2011 and apply similarly proportionate levels to Production Allowance allocations for the years 2012 - 2014. Regarding the concerns raised in the Interim Final Rule as published on August 5, 2011:

– Increased US production of HCFCs. Wh ile R- 22 production levels are also heavily influenced by dem ands for downstream products for which R- 22 is used as a chemical intermediate, and by availability/cost of raw materials, this potential increase in Production Allowances could result in a slight relative increase in US R - 22 production. However since the use of any such increased production in the US is co ntrolled and capped within the total allocation of Consumption Allowances, all or part of the increase would be counterbalanced by a decrease in R - 22 im portation. Globally, this could provide a net environmental benefit given the known/low levels of byprod uct emissions caused by US production and by reducing need for international transportation of R - 22.

– Greater US production of R - 22 for export. Given the factors mentioned above plus the fact that export opportunities would exist in any case for R - 22 used i n downstream chemical processes, it is unlikely that this increase in Production Allowances would lead to a significant increase in R - 22 exports. Globally, total R- 22 production will be driven by market factors including demands for downstream chemicals pl us regulated uses and constrained by availability, pricing, and allocation of raw materials and by opportunities for conversion of R - 22 production equipment for other uses. Relative to global production, any impact caused by the potential increase in Produ ction Allowances would be very small.

– Hindrance of the 2015 "next step" in HCFC phase - out plan. The availability and pricing of R - 22 in the US for regulated uses will continue to be influenced much more heavily by Consumption Allowances. An increase in ava ilable Production Allowances will provide broader options for expending those Consumption Allowances through US Production vs. Import of the associated R - 22 material. To summarize, we believe that this action relative to R - 22 Production Allowances entail s little if any risk, while potentially providing benefits to US manufacturers and to the global environment.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0635

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SAUL JAMES DOOLING,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 19, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 13 2023

03/13/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0635
No. 55915.

protests 135731-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bernard & Bernard, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# sec5

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2017-06	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCA - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ROCHELLE : 02-3867

MONTGOMERY : 02-3889

HINES : 02-3901

KARI, et al. : 02-3926

HABERMAN : 02-3936

MILEY : 02-3951

FRANCO, et al. : 02-3975

DAVIS : 02-4113

RUSSELL, et al. : 02-4116

HERNANDEZ, et al. : 02-4126

QUILLEN, et al. : 02-4167

SIMMONS, et al. : 02-4174

BIEDERMAN : 02-4194

DRY, et al. : 02-4225

COOK : 02-4237

STEFAN, et al. : 02-4277

WALKER, et al. : 02-4283

DUNCAN, et al. : 02-4301

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04301-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Stewart Dalzell, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04301-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:04-cv-00573-LKK -GGH   Document 20    Filed 08/18/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-26T16:52:50-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
----

Action brought on 26 April 2006 — Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret and Akar v Commission

(Case T-129/06)

(2006/C 212/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicants: Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Limited Sirketi (Cankaya/Ankara, Turkey) and M. Akar (Cankaya/Ankara, Turkey) (represented by: C. Sahin, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicants are contesting the decision of the European Commission Delegation in Turkey of 23 December 2005 which was addressed to the applicants with regard to the call for tenders in respect of the construction of educational establishments in the provinces of Diyarbakir and Siirt.

The applicants submit, inter alia, that their tender was the lowest and that the file in respect thereof was complete and therefore the contract should have been awarded to them. Furthermore, they submit that the contested decision infringes European Union law.

----
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report ofInternational Aluminum Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the periodended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, Mitchell K. Fogelman, the Senior Vice President-Finance and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:   September 7, 2005 | MITCHELL K. FOGELMAN                 |   |
|------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------|--------|
|                                     | Mitchell K. Fogelman                 |   |
|                                     | Senior Vice President – Finance |   |
|                                     | and Chief Financial Officer          |   |

 

----
June 06, 2014

USSGL Board Members,

All proposed accounts (Fiscal 2014 and 2015) on the U.S. Government Standard General 

Ledger (USSGL) Voting Ballot # 14-01 (dated May 22, 2014) have been approved by a 

majority of 22 votes from the USSGL Board Members.

These accounts will be effective for Fiscal 2014 and 2015 reporting as stated on the 

ballot.

Bureau of the Fiscal Service 

USSGL Agency Accounting Division
Case No. 14,484.

#### UNITED STATES v. ALVISO.

[Nowhere reported. Opinion not now accessible.]
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 This matter was determined to be suitable for decision without *

oral argument. L.R. 78-230(h).

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN BOWMAN, )

) 2:04-cv-0755-GEB-PAN (JFM)

Plaintiff, )

) ORDER*

v. )

)

BEST WESTERN STATION HOUSE INN; )

THE WILLIFORD FAMILY PARTNERSHIP; )

and BEST WESTERN INTERNATIONAL, )

INC., )

)

Defendants. )

)

On January 17, 2006, Defendants filed a motion for monetary

sanctions against Plaintiff’s counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1927 and the

Court’s inherent power. Plaintiff opposes the motion.

Since Defendants have not sufficiently distinguished the

fees attributable to the Americans with Disabilities Act claim from

those attributable to the state claims, the motion is denied. See

Pontarelli v. Stone, 781 F. Supp. 114, 127 (D. R.I. 1992) (finding an 

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00755-GEB-PAN Document 61 Filed 03/24/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

award of attorneys’ fees was not permitted where the movant failed to

distinguish time spent on frivolous and non-frivolous claims).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: March 23, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00755-GEB-PAN Document 61 Filed 03/24/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 52542.-

protests 131146-K, etc. (New York).

#### Lamson & Hubbard, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
##### Prepared in cooperation with the ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND
  TECK COMINCO LIMITED

Geologic Map of the Big Delta B-2 Quadrangle, East-Central Alaska

#### *By* **Warren C. Day*1*, John
    N. Aleinikoff*1*, Paul Roberts*2*, Moira Smith*2*,
    Bruce M. Gamble*1*, Mitchell W. Henning*3*, Larry P. Gough*1*,
and Laurie C. Morath*1***

Version 1.0

thumbnail image

***1***U.S. Geological Survey***2***Teck Cominco Limited, #600-200 Burrard Street, Vancouver, B.C., Canada
V6C3L9***3***Alaska Department of Natural Resources, Division of Mining and Water Management, Anchorage, AK 99501



---



|I-2788 PDF file (2.85 MB)         |                                                                      
|--------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                  |                                                                      
|I-2788 text only PDF file (57 KB) | (This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)
|                                  |                                                                      
|I-2788 MET file (21 KB)           | Metadata File                                                        
|                                  |                                                                      
|Bases ZIP file (1.14 MB)          | Contains georegistered raster images of the topographic base maps.   

|ArcInfo export  files of each geospatial data set are included 
  in the archived files (below).
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|I-2788 ZIP file (807 KB)                                                                        
|I-2788 TAR.GZ file (813 KB)                                                                     

---

|AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices                                                                                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/imap/i-2788/
Questions or Assistance: USGS Web Contact
Page Last Modified: Wed Nov 30 17:36 EDT 2016

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financials contained in the body of the accompanying Form 10-Q and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                             219
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,988
<ALLOWANCES>                                       224
<INVENTORY>                                      3,154
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,526
<PP&E>                                          12,433
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,295
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,993
<BONDS>                                          1,168
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           136
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,554
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,938
<SALES>                                          4,769
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,911
<CGS>                                            2,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,401
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    37
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 128
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    392
<INCOME-TAX>                                       157
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                235
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       235
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>