alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT 

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

52E Is First Year and Beginning Balance Validation

If the TAS is in the First Year of Authority then the Beginning/Ending Attribute must be E.

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass 075 1099001Pass 075 1099005Pass 075 1099006Pass 075 1099008Pass 075 1099009Pass 075 1099010Pass 075 1435001Pass 075 1435005Pass 075 1435006Pass 075 1435008Pass 075 1435009Pass 075 1435010Pass 075 3200001Pass 075 3200005Pass 075 3200006Pass 075 3200008Pass 075 3200009Pass 075 3200010Pass 075 3220001Pass 075 3220005Pass 075 3220006Pass 075 3220008Pass 075 3220009Pass 075 3220010

69E

Limited use of specific USSGL and Fund Type combinations

The use of some USSGL and GTAS Fund Type Code combinations is limited to specific Treasury Account Symbols.

ALLOCATION 

TRANSFER 

AGENCY 

IDENTIFIER

AGENCY 

IDENTIFIER

MAIN ACCOUNT 

CODE

Pass (BLANK) 047 5640 Pass (BLANK) 075 5551 Pass (BLANK) 089 5068 Pass (BLANK) 089 5369 Pass (BLANK) 480 5589 Pass (BLANK) 487 5415 Pass (BLANK) 012 1143 

Pass (BLANK) 016 0327 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Bulletin No. 2019-06 DRAFT VII VDR - 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus TERRY ANTONIO LEATH, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CR-97-78, CA-00-730-1) Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 14, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Antonio Leath, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Hewlett Miller, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* We note that Leath’s claim that his sentence violates the holding in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), is foreclosed in light of our recent determination that Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review. See United States v. Sanders , 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir. 2001). 2 PER CURIAM: Terry Antonio Leath seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. * See United States v. Leath , Nos. CR-97-78;CA-00-730-1 (M.D.N.C. May 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS R. ELLINGTON, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0666 DFL KJM P

vs.

E.S. ALAMEIDA, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action. On June 17,

2005, the court issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s request for a

temporary restraining order and a preliminary injunction be denied for his failure to notify the

defendants.

On June 27, 2005, plaintiff filed objections, noting that he has now given notice to

defendant Rohlfing and to David Runnels, the Warden of High Desert State Prison. Moreover,

on June 29, July 5, July 6, July 8, July 18, and August 8, 2005, plaintiff has filed additional

documents supporting his request for the use of a wheelchair for a limited time, to allow him

access to the law library in order to make the necessary copies for service of the complaint.

The court intends to act on plaintiff’s request for a temporary restraining order

within thirty days from the date of this order. If defendants wish to take any position with respect

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 35 Filed 08/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

to plaintiff’s request, they may do so within twenty-one days from the date of this order.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The findings and recommendations of June 17, 2005 are hereby vacated; 

2. Any filing by defendants in response to plaintiff’s request for a temporary

restraining order shall be filed within twenty-one days of this order; and

2. The Clerk’s Office is directed to send a copy of this order to Warden David

Runnels and Doctor Rohlfing at High Desert State Prison. 

DATED: August 12, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

elli0666.48a 

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 35 Filed 08/15/05 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1453 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1453

   To allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to designate 
  certain substance use disorder treatment facilities as eligible for 
                 National Health Service Corps service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2017

 Mr. Donnelly (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to designate 
  certain substance use disorder treatment facilities as eligible for 
                 National Health Service Corps service.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Strengthening the Addiction 
Treatment Workforce Act''.

SEC. 2. SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER TREATMENT FACILITIES.

    Section 332(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 
254e(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``; and'' and 
        inserting a semicolon;
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(E) a substance use disorder treatment facility that--
                    ``(i) provides treatment for substance use 
                disorders through, at a minimum, outpatient counseling, 
                medication-assisted treatment using drugs approved by 
                the Food and Drug Administration, other evidence-based 
                ambulatory services, or residential treatment services;
                    ``(ii) provides other evidence-based opioid 
                addiction treatment and recovery services;
                    ``(iii) is primarily engaged in serving individuals 
                living with, or in recovery from, substance use 
                disorders; and
                    ``(iv) has any license, certification, or 
                accreditation required by the State.''.
                                 <all>
```
(Reap. Dec. 8642)

Entry Nos. 1508; 1507.

#### International Packers Commercial Division of International Packers, Limited *v.*United States

(Decided September 14, 1956)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement relate to canned corned beef, packed 12 ounces to a tin, and 24 tins per case, exported from Uruguay.

The appeals have been submitted on stipulated facts, showing that foreign value, as defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, and that such statutory value is Uruguay pesos 4.9688 per dozen tins, packing included. I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2005

The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Joseph J. BouffardName:

Joseph J. BouffardTitle:

PresidentBy:

/s/ Bonnie M. KleinName:

Bonnie M. KleinTitle:

Senior Vice President and Treasurer


Date: July 16, 2007
1 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 

 

------------------------------------------------------ x 

IN RE SEPTEMBER 11 LITIGATION 

 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

21 MC 97 (AKH) 

This document relates to: 

Deena Burnett v. United Airlines, Inc., et 

al., 02 Civ. 6186 (AKH) 

Beverly Burnett v. United Airlines, Inc.,

et al., 03 Civ. 7073 (AKH) 

------------------------------------------------------ x 

ALVIN K. HELLERSTEIN, U.S.D.J.: 

ORDER CONCERNING SETTLEMENT AND FEES

Counsel for Plaintiffs Deena and Beverly Burnett—their clients’ claims having 

been settled—submit an application pursuant to my Order Concerning Settlement of June 28, 

2007, Filipov v. American Airlines, Inc., et al., No. 03 Civ. 7079 (AKH), for an allocation of 25 

percent of the net settlement amount as their reasonable contingency fee. See Gair v. Peck, 6 

N.Y.2d 97 (N.Y. 1959) (interpreting N.Y. Jud. L. § 474 and holding that under New York law 

contingent fee contracts are subject to considerations of reasonableness). For the following 

reasons, counsel’s application is denied. 

Plaintiffs settled their cases in the course of mediations conducted in January, 

2007, and with the assistance of the Court. The Burnett cases were settled around the same time 

as plaintiff Loretta Filipov settled her claims, and after numbers of other plaintiffs’ settlements. I 

reject the instant application for the same reasons that I declined to approve an allocation of 25 

percent of Ms. Filipov’s settlement amount as fee to her attorneys: At the time of both 

settlements, the practice regarding settlements was to limit contingent fees to 15 percent, and I 

had not approved an allocation of contingent fees after settlement of greater than 15 percent. 

There is no reason to distinguish the Burnetts’ settlement from the other plaintiffs’ cases that
---

Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Interdyne Company (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





September 1, 2011By:
/s/Sun Tze WhangSun Tze WhangChief Executive OfficerSeptember 1, 2011By:
/s/ Kit H. TanKit H. TanChief Financial Officer/Principal Accounting Officer
No. 51650.

#### Protests 503786-G, etc., of B. F. Montague Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: G.A.

PETITION OF: A.A., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 26 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: P.A.

PETITION OF: A.A., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 27 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

IN RE: ADOPTION OF: D.A.

PETITION OF: A.A., FATHER :

:

:

:

: No. 28 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of March, 2023

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
October 14, 2010 

A&C-10-403 

Page 1 of 1 

Sandy R. Liu 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of Environment and Energy, (AEE-100) Noise Division 

800 Independence Ave, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Subject: Gulfstream Application – Authorization to Exceed Mach 1 (§ 91.817) 

Dear Mr. Liu: 

Gulfstream requests FAA consideration to allow certain Flight Tests aspects associated with the 

company’s proposed maximum Design Dive Mach number (Md) of 0.99M to exceed Mach 1. 

This FAA authorization is conducive to 14 CFR Part 91, Appendix B – Authorization to Exceed 

Mach 1 (§ 91.817). 

Gulfstream proposes to conduct a series of actual test at or above Mach 1 to coincide with an 

analytical analysis in an effort to determine aircraft characteristics as the aircraft approaches the 

maximum Design Dive Mach number speed. 

If there are any questions, or if I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact 

me at (912) 965-5270 or GAC.Cert@Gulfstream.com. 

Sincerely, 

Anthony Beck, Manager 

Airworthiness & Certification
No. 60022.

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

protests 177602-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Page 1 of 3

 IRC Handout 04/21/2021

Proposed Criminal Restitution USSGL Accounts (Effective Fiscal Year 2021)

Account Title: Criminal Restitution Receivable 

Account Number: 137400

Normal Balance: Debit

Definition: The amount of criminal restitution funds receivable, resulting from court-ordered fines and restitution in which a convicted 

offender is ordered to reimburse funds for losses incurred to federal entities. Criminal restitution may be ordered for losses incurred 

directly related to the offender’s crime. Recognize as a receivable when court actions determine an assessment (SFFAS No. 7, par. 54). 

This account does not close at year-end.

Justification: Fiscal Service continuesthe analysis of criminal restitution in preparation of the Financial Report of the U.S. Government. 

The reporting requirement for entities will be removed for FY 2021. However, USSGL accounts separating criminal restitution from 

other accounts receivable will help to streamline the financial reporting and audit processes.

Account Title: Allowance for Loss on Criminal Restitution Receivable

Account Number: 137900

Normal Balance: Debit

Definition: The estimated amount of loss due to uncollectible criminal restitution receivables. This account does not close at year-end.

Justification: Fiscal Service continues the analysis of criminal restitution in preparation of the Financial Report of the U.S. Government. 

The reporting requirement for entities will be removed for FY 2021. However, USSGL accounts separating criminal restitution from 

other accounts receivable will help to streamline the financial reporting and audit processes.
Page 2 of 3

 IRC Handout 04/21/2021

 

Attribute Table (Effective Fiscal Year 2021)

No. USSGL Account Title Anticipated Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

137400 Criminal Restitution Receivable N P D B/E D/C

137900 Allowance for Loss on Criminal 

Restitution Receivable N P C B/E D/C

Avail 

Time

BEA Cat Borrow 

Source

Budgetary

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Yr

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Non 

Fed

Trading 

Ptnr

Trading 

Ptnr Main

PY

Adj

Program 

Indicator

A/S N

A/S N

Program 

Rpt Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing

Account 

Code

TAS

Status

Trans. 

Code

CF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/MR/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

CF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/MR/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N
Page 3 of 3

 IRC Handout 04/21/2021

 

Impact on Crosswalks (FY 2021):

USSGL

Account

 Balance 

 Sheet

Net

Cost

 Net 

Position

Custodial 

Activity

Reclassified 

Balance 

Sheet

Reclassified 

 Net 

 Cost

Reclassified

Net 

Position

SF133 Schedule 

P

SBR

137400 Line 8 N/A N/A Lines 7 & 9 Line 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

137900 Line 8 N/A N/A Lines 7 & 9 Line 8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Impacts to the following GTAS Edits/Validations: 

Edit Rule Number Rule Name

22 Beginning Proprietary Account Balance

23 Ending Proprietary Account Balance
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000Draft&"Arial,Regular"&K000000 &"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-06	&"Arial,Bold"VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 04-20-17
EXHIBIT 21
                            IONICS, INCORPORATED

                       SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



                                             State or Other Jurisdiction
        Name                                       of Incorporation

Ionics Foreign Sales Corporation Limited             Jamaica
Global Water Services, S.A.                          Panama
Ionics Italba, S.p.A.                                Italy
Ionics Iberica, S.A.                                 Spain
Ionics Nederland B.V.                                The Netherlands
Ionics Ultrapure Water Corporation                   California
Ionics Securities Corporation                        Massachusetts
Ionics (U.K.) Limited                                United Kingdom
Ionics (Bermuda) Ltd.*                               Bermuda
Elite Chemicals Pty. Ltd.                            Australia
Eau et Industrie                                     France
Resources Conservation Co. International             Delaware
Ionics Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.                        Singapore
Ionics Watertec Pty. Ltd.                            Australia
Enersave Engineering Systems Sdn Bhd***              Malaysia
Apollo Ultrapure Water Systems, Inc.                 California
Aqua Design, Inc.*                                   California
Separation Technology, Inc.**                        Minnesota
Ionics (Korea) Ltd.                                  Delaware
Sievers Instruments, Inc.                            Colorado

*   The Registrant, either directly, through Aqua Design, Inc. or
    through Ionics (Bermuda) Ltd., wholly owns nine subsidiary
    corporations incorporated in various Caribbean jurisdictions.
    These subsidiary corporations own and operate, or operate and
    maintain, desalination plants for the supply of potable water
    to resorts, hotels and municipalities.

**  Owns a U.K. subsidiary, SeparaTech Limited.

*** Registrant through Ionics Iberica, S.A. owns 55% of this
    entity.

/213
#### In re Martin LEE.

No. 00-1280.

Reexamination No. 90/003,884.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Jan. 12, 2000.

Before CLEVENGER, LINN, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

Judgment

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
1 

 2 

 3 

 4 

 5 

 6 

 7 

 8 

 9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

 1

 BARRY MORRIS, SBN #48368 

Attorney at Law 

1220 Oakland Blvd. #200 

Walnut Creek, CA 94596 

(925) 934-1100 

fax: (925) 934-1122 

barrymorris@mac.com

Attorney for Defendant 

BENITO JULIAN LUNA 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

 

BENITO JULIAN LUNA, No. CIV S-04-0627 FCD GGH 

 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

 

SCOTT KERNAN, 

 

Respondent./ 

 

 

Order Extending Time to File Status Report 

 GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, the time in which 

counsel for petitioner BENITO JULIAN LUNA must file a status report 

is extended until September 27, 2011 

Dated: August 10, 2011 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

_______________________________________ 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE-JUDGE 

Case 2:04-cv-00627-MCE-GGH Document 22 Filed 08/11/11 Page 1 of 1
No. 54620.

#### Eitinger Bead Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 115175-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 78, C. A. D. 401), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS RUBEN ELLINGTON,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0666 DFL KJM P

vs.

E.S. ALAMIEDA, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On February 23, 2006, plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. 

Defendants have filed a motion to strike or otherwise stay the motion for summary judgment to

allow them to complete discovery. Plaintiff has opposed the motion. 

Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment does not include a statement of

undisputed facts and so does not comply with L.R. 56-260(a). Moreover, it relies on

unauthenticated and in some cases unidentified documents. See Fed. R. Evid. 901. Because it

does not comply with the rules governing summary judgment, it should be denied.

/////

/////

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 73 Filed 03/16/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

1. Plaintiff’s February 23, 2006, motion for summary judgment is denied without

prejudice to refiling in accordance with the court’s scheduling order of February 21, 2006 and not

before the close of the period for discovery. 

2. Defendants’ March 1, 2006 motion to strike is denied as unnecessary in light of

the above ruling. 

DATED: March 16, 2006.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2

elli0666.dwp

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 73 Filed 03/16/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.CERTIFICATIONIn connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Mark A. Richman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as ofthe date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United StatesCode, that to the best of my knowledge: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.   Date: August 9, 2005 By /s/ Mark A. Richman
21.15