alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P.
for the period ended March 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST V


                              By:  /s/ Marlene Debel
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: May 11, 2007
_____________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7615

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ELTRENTROSE F. LIVERMAN, a/k/a Trent,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief

District Judge. (2:95-cr-00151-JBF-FBS-7; 2:12-cv-00417-RBS)

Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eltrentrose F. Liverman, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob 

Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eltrentrose F. Liverman seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order construing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 

(2006) as a successive 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) 

motion and denying relief. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Liverman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 57987.

protests 107414-K and 107415-K (Laredo).

#### F. G. Jackson *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It appearing that the protests were filed prior to liquidation, same were dismissed as premature. (Section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.)
Accepted: RTR Bins 1 and 2 -- EPA/OMB Meeting

Fri 08/27/2010 3:00 PM - 4:00 

PM

Location: Conf. No. -- (919) 541-4332

RTP Conference Room -- D201

"Higgins, Cortney" has accepted this meeting invitation

Required:

Ann Johnson/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Brenda Shine/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

chiggins@OMB.eop.gov, Dave Guinnup/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Elaine 

Manning/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Eric Ginsburg/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jan
EXHIBIT 23

                  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Dain Rauscher Corporation:

  We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 333-03113, Registration Statement No. 333-20487,
Registration Statement No. 33-58069, Registration Statement No.
33-54223, Registration Statement No. 33-54907, Registration
Statement No. 33-59426, Registration Statement No. 33-39182,
Registration Statement No. 33-25979, post-effective amendment
No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-13068, post-effective
amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 33-10243, post-
effective amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No. 33-10242,
post-effective amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No. 2-
90634, post-effective amendment No. 8 to Registration Statement
No. 2-61514, post-effective amendment No. 11 to Registration
Statement No. 2-57759, post-effective amendment No. 15 to
Registration Statement No. 2-53289, post-effective amendment No.
16 to Registration Statement No. 2-51150 and Registration
Statement No. 1-08186 of Dain Rauscher Corporation, and
subsidiaries of our report dated February 5, 1998, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Dain Rauscher Corporation
(formerly Interra Financial Incorporated) and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows and the related
financial statement schedule for each of the years in the three-
year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the
December 31, 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Dain Rauscher
Corporation.

KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 16, 1998
SERVED: JANUARY 31, 2013 

0 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AERO MICRONESIA 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED]. 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. F AA-2012 - 0468 

IN THE MATTER OF 

AERO MICRONESIA 

. FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012- 0469 

ORDER CONTINUING CASE 

Ziill FED ~ l r) 1: 30 

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Complainant, filed a Motion for 

Continuance dated January 18., 2013. Complainant represents Aero Micronesia, 

Respondent, has no objection. 

WHEREFORE, the Motion for Continuance having been read and considered, the 

hearing currently scheduled for April17, 18 and 19, 2013, inclusive, in the U.S. District 

Court, District of Hawaii, be and is hereby continued to a date after May 17, 2013. 

Richard C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment- Service List 

1 
SERVICE LIST 0 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Michael R. Quinn, President 

Aero Micronesia, Inc., dba 

Pacific Airlines Respondent 

156 Diablo Road, Suite 203 

Danville, CA 94526 

TEL: 925-362-4430 

FAX: 925-362-4432 

Don Bobertz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.4 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-3454 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

ONE COPY 

FDMS Nos. FAA-2012-0468 

& FAA-2012-0469 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 

2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

2
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Data Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul K.
McGrath, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Paul K. McGrath
--------------------------
Paul K. McGrath
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2002
# sec5_snc

Draft	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SNC - &P	February 15, 2024 IRC Handout
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3969 

To amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice to expand the definition 

of aiding the enemy to include the provision of military education, military training, and tactical advice. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 19, 2024 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Uniform Code of Military Justice to expand 

the definition of aiding the enemy to include the provision of military education, military training, and tactical 

advice. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safeguarding Tactics 

5 and Operational Procedures from Enemies Act of 2024’’ 

6 or the ‘‘STOP Enemies Act’’. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3969 IS

1 SEC. 2. AIDING THE ENEMY DEFINITION FOR PURPOSES OF 

2 THE UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE. 

3 Section 903b(2) of title 10, United States Code (arti4 cle 103b(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice) is 

5 amended by inserting ‘‘provides military education, mili6 tary training, or tactical advice to,’’ after ‘‘gives intel7 ligence to,’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Part 1, Section VI: USSGL Crosswalks to Reclassified 

Statements

This section includes crosswalks for use in Fiscal Year 2021 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map 

USSGL accounts to external reports in accordance with TFM Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 4700, Federal 

Entity Reporting Requirements for the Financial Report of the United States Government. Each report 

crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or column on the 

reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This subsidiary 

information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional information 

on attributes.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by 

Fiscal Service:

Section VI Page Number

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Balance Sheet (RBS) VI RBS - 1

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Net Cost (RSNC) VI RSNC - 1

USSGL Crosswalk Reclassified Statement of Operations and 

Changes in Net Position (RSOCNP)

VI RSOCNP - 1

Page 1 of 1
No. 66804.

#### C. A. Haynes & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 269948-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, T.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB     Document 4      Filed 05/21/2004     Page 1 of 7

Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB     Document 4      Filed 05/21/2004     Page 2 of 7

Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB     Document 4      Filed 05/21/2004     Page 3 of 7

Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB     Document 4      Filed 05/21/2004     Page 4 of 7

Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB     Document 4      Filed 05/21/2004     Page 5 of 7

Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB     Document 4      Filed 05/21/2004     Page 6 of 7

Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB     Document 4      Filed 05/21/2004     Page 7 of 7
No. 46084.

#### Protests 969010-G, etc., of Tupman-Thurlow Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Stokby*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358) it was held that 10 percent allowance should have been made for the weight of the gelatinous material in question.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
128405 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 128405 COA: 250325 Wayne CC: 03-003652-02 JOHN WILLIAM FAIR, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to app eal the February 15, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

t1024 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2005

Clerk
Before the Third Division,

September 18, 1951

No. 55887.

protest 119173-K (New York).

#### K. Nissan *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of rugs and carpets exported from Iran between the dates of December 21, 1939, and September 26, 1941, and that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 54056. In accordance with stipulation of .counsel and pursuant to the instructions contained in T. D. 51892, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, converting the currency of the invoices, Iranian rials, to United States dollars at the rate of $.053475 as to all items, except as to the items covered by abandoned entry 31178, and as to any merchandise which was exported with benefit of drawback.
Before the Third Division,

June 18, 1941

No. 46074.

#### Petition 5931-R of W. H. Curtin & Co., Inc. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

A motion to incorporate the record in Reap. Dee. 4602 was granted. A motion to deny the petition was denied. It was held that the court has jurisdiction to determine the issue. *Guiste & Co.*v. *United States,*G. A. 9077 (T. D. 41274), *Howe Infants Wear*v. *United States*(T. D. 42957), *Hugo Falck & Co.*v. *United States*(T. D. 45667), *Henry Kayser & Fils*v. *United States*(T. D. 46166), and Abstract 16598 cited. In harmony with Abstract 42733, 3 Cust. Ct. 485, where the same situation was involved, it was hold that the petitioner acted without intention to misrepresent the facts or defraud the revenue. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 60027.

#### C. J. Tower *&*Sons *v.*United States,

protests 10237-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the lumber is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*(24 C. C. P. A. 156, T. D. 48640) and *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(73 Treas. Dec. 714, T. D. 49530), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to certain of the protests in question. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entries on the basis of the actual number of board feet of planed, tongued, and/or grooved lumber imported, as shown on the invoices and/or the entries covered by the said protests, or as may be calculated arithmetically from the information shown thereon. In all other respects and as to all other merchandise, the protests were overruled.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Modify an Accounting Code

To modify an existing accounting code, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, select Manage Organizations>Accounting Codes>Modify. 

The Step 1 of 3: Select OTC Endpoint page appears.

2. Select the organization endpoint for the accounting codes you wish to modify. The Step 2 of 

3: Update Accounting Codes page appears. 

3. Under the New Accounting Codes to be Added table, enter the accounting code details, 

and click Next. 

If an Agency Accounting Code label is customized, it is displayed as the label above 

the imported or modified codes within the Maintain Accounting Codes module, according 

to the custom label that was defined for the highest-level organization. Within the rest of 

the application, custom labels apply to deposit processing functionalities, but are not 

extended to check processing functionalities. The default accounting code label is 

Agency Accounting Code.

Update the details by completing the following:

• Clicking the TAS checkbox to indicate that the accounting code is a Treasury Account 

Symbol (TAS), if applicable

• Entering details in both the Agency Accounting Code and Description text boxes as 

shown in Figure 1

• Checking the Skip Selected box to skip saving any of the imported accounting codes

Figure 1. Step 2 of 3: Update Accounting Codes

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

4. The Step 3 of 3: Review Accounting Codes page appears. Verify the information is correct 

and click Submit. A Confirmation page appears presenting the imported accounting codes. 

Simultaneously, accounting codes flagged as TAS must be transmitted to the Shared 

Accounting Module (SAM) to confirm they are valid TAS strings.

Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

Additional Button
# Data

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2020-21	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 7/16/20
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-60505

Summary Calendar

JOHNNY BURSE, Sgt.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

ALICE SCOTT, in her official capacity as

Mayor of the City of Canton, Mississippi,

and in her individual capacity; JIMMY WILSON,

in his official capacity as Chief of Police

of the City of Canton, Mississippi, and in his

individual capacity; CITY OF CANTON, MISSISSIPPI,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:95-CV-678BN)

December 31, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Burse filed suit against Scott, the Mayor of the City of

Canton, Mississippi, and against Wilson, the Chief of Police of the
2

City of Canton, Mississippi, both in their individual and official

capacities, and against the City of Canton, Mississippi, itself,

alleging that he was suspended and ultimately demoted from his job

as Narcotics Investigator for the City of Canton/Madison County

Sheriff’s Department’s Joint Drug Task Force as a result of

retaliation for his support of the incumbent mayor of Canton in an

election won by his challenger. Burse also alleged that he was

denied due process by the actions of the defendants and that the

defendants had made defamatory statements about him. The

defendants moved for summary judgment which the lower court

granted. 

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts and relevant portions of the summary judgment

record itself. For the reasons stated by the district court in its

Opinion and Order filed under date of June 24, 1996, we are

satisfied that the Final Judgment filed under date of June 24 is

correct and should be affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 51-2 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 4

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 51 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 51-2 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 51-2 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 51-2 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

Tong Ho Zhang

Petitioner,

v.

John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney

General, Immigration and

Naturalization Service

Respondent.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4377

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of the Respondent

in the above-captioned matter. 

 

SUSAN R. BECKER

Assistant United States Attorney 

615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250 

Philadelphia, PA 19106

Tel: (215)861-8310

Fax: (215)861-8642

Dated: July 10, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-04377-JD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and

correct copy of the foregoing to be served by first-class United

States mail, postage prepaid, upon the following: 

Tong Ho Zhang

Berks County Prison

1287 Welfare County Road

Leesport, PA 19533

 

SUSAN R. BECKER

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: July 10, 2002 

Case 2:02-cv-04377-JD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 05-363-6

v. : 

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-986

DAVID CALHOUN, :

Defendant. :

__________________________________________:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of February 2013, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion 

to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct his Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 439), the 

Government’s response thereto, and the supplemental briefs submitted by the parties, and after 

an evidentiary hearing on the Motion, and for the reasons stated in the Opinion filed this day and 

in the June 28, 2012 Opinion of the Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is 

GRANTED and Defendant’s judgment of conviction and sentence dated August 11, 2006 is

VACATED.

It is further ORDERED that Defendant’s Motions for Reconsideration (Doc. Nos. 490, 

525) and his “Motion for Production of Juror’s Names and Addresses from Jury Clerk” (Doc. 

No. 520) are DISMISSED without prejudice as moot at this time.

The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE Civil Action No. 10-986.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

____________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.