alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8150)

#### Mrs. J. D. Zellerbach and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 6914, etc.

(Decided July 25, 1952)

*Lawrence & Tuttle (George R. Tuttle*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. FitzQibbon,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

*457It is hereby stipulated, by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the court:

> 1) That the merchandise marked "A” on the invoices and initialed TLW by Customs Examiner T. L. Walton, involved in the appeals listed in the attached schedule, consists of merchandise exported from France, and appraised at values which included the so-called production or unique tax (also known as the French Fiscal Reform Law tax) in the amounts as shown by the invoices and accompanying certificates of pending reappraisement.

> 2) That merchandise such or similar to the imported merchandise, marked “A” in paragraph I, when sold or offered for sale at the time of exportation, in France for home consumption, or for exportation to countries other than the United States, in the ordinary course of trade to all purchasers, and in the usual wholesale quantities, was sold or offered for sale at the appraised values herein, less the French Fiscal Reform Tax (Production or Unique tax) as referred to above in paragraph 1 and as added by the importer on entry, plus 1.01 percent Armament tax when not included in the appraised value, packed, and that the export value was no higher.

> 3) That all other claims of the plaintiffs, as raised by these appeals, are hereby abandoned, and that upon this stipulation these cases are submitted.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise represented on the invoices by the items marked “A” and initialed TLW by Customs Examiner T. L. Walton, and that such values were the appraised values, less the French fiscal reform tax (production or unique tax) as added by the importers on entry, plus 1.01 per centum armament tax when not included in the appraised value, packed.

The appeals having been abandoned insofar as they relate to all other merchandise, to that extent the appeals are hereby dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Create an OTC Endpoint 

To add an OTC Endpoint from the highest organization hierarchy, complete the following steps:

1. From the Administration tab, select Manage Organization>Organization 

Hierarchy>Modify. The Step 1 of 3: Select an OTC Endpoint page appears.

2. Select your OTC Endpoint from the list. The Step 2 of 3: Update OTC Endpoint Information

page appears. View details for Add lower levels to this OTC Endpoint checkbox as 

shown in Figure 1.

3. Check the Add lower levels to this OTC Endpoint checkbox.

4. Enter the lower level OTC Endpoint’s Short Name(s) and Description(s) and click Next. 

Figure 1. Step 2 of 3: Update OTC Endpoint Information

• In the table that appears, add new OTC Endpoints that fall in the level under the 

current OTC Endpoint.

• Short name(s) are user-defined text describing an organization. Short names 

must be unique within an organization hierarchy (e.g., Short name: IRS; 

Description: Internal Revenue Service).

5. In the Step 3 of 3: Review OTC Endpoint(s) page, review and verify the OTC Endpoint 

details and click Submit. A Confirmation page appears presenting the modified OTC 

Endpoint (and verifies the added lower level OTC Endpoint).

Application Tips
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• Click Add More Lines to add additional lower levels to this endpoint.

• Click Cancel to return to the OTCnet Home Page. No data is saved. 

• Click Previous to return to the previous page.

• Click Return Home to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

Additional Buttons
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-50553

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

AARON EUGENE AUBREY,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. W-99-CR-99-1

--------------------

March 30, 2001

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Aaron Eugene Aubrey appeals the sentence he received as a

result of his guilty-plea conviction for two counts of making

false statements, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001; one count of

possession of a stolen firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(j); and one count of being an accessory after the fact to a

bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 3. 

Aubrey argues that he should not have received an increase

for obstruction of justice based on an alleged attempt to escape

from the jail where he was being held prior to sentencing because
No. 00-50553

-2-

the district court relied on evidence with insufficient indicia

of reliability. Aubrey has not met his burden of demonstrating

that the evidence relied upon by the district court to determine

that he obstructed justice was materially untrue. See United

States v. Slaughter, ___ F.3d ___ (5th Cir. Jan. 12, 2001, No.

99-11142) 2000 WL 1946670 at *5.

Aubrey also argues that the district court erred in denying

him credit for acceptance of responsibility because he admitted

the conduct alleged in the indictment and his admission was

consistent with the information contained in the factual basis. 

Aubrey has not demonstrated that this is an extraordinary case in

which adjustments for both acceptance of responsibility and

obstruction of justice may apply. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment.

(n.4). 

AFFIRMED.
02.01 Start and Stop the OTCnet OLB Application
No. 66267.

#### Dolliff & McGrath et al. *v.*United States,

protests 262211-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste pieces similar in all material respects to those the subject of *P. Silverman & Son*v. *United States*(27 C.C.P.A. 324, C.A.D. 107), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 24

Dockets.Justia.com
**Balance Sheet Modifications, Effective FY 22 Reporting**

**FASAB Authoritative (Level A GAAP) Guidance:**

· “Accounts payable are not intended to include liabilities related to on-going continuous expenses such as employees’ salary and benefits, which are covered by other current liabilities. (See recommended standard for Other Current Liabilities.)” **(SFFAS 1, Paragraph 75)**

· “Typical examples of other current liabilities to be recognized are: (a) accrued employees’ wages, bonuses, and salaries for services rendered in the current fiscal year for which paychecks will be issued in the following year; (b) accrued entitlement benefits payable, such as Old Age Survivors Insurance (OASI) and Veterans Compensation and Pension benefits applicable to the current period but not yet paid, and (c) annuities for the current fiscal year administered by trust, pension, or insurance programs for which payment would be made in the following fiscal year. Such liabilities may be presented on the face of the financial reports as Other Current Liabilities or as one or more separate categories depending on the materiality of the amounts.” **(SFFAS 1, Paragraph 84)**

Page 2 of 2	                                                                   IRC Handout 12/1/2021

# image1.png

# image2.png
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>
                    INTERRA FINANCIAL INCORPORATED
                COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
            (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)
<CAPTION>
                                        Year ended December 31,
                                      --------------------------
                                       1996      1995      1994
                                      --------------------------
<S>                                   <C>       <C>       <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Net earnings.......................   $56,811   $35,873   $25,453
                                       ======    ======    ======
Average number of common and
 common equivalent shares
 outstanding:
 Average common shares outstanding.    12,132    12,115    12,155
 Shares credited to deferred
  compensation plan participants...        98         -         -
 Dilutive effect of stock options..       522       431       387
                                       ------    ------    ------
                                       12,752    12,546    12,542
                                       ------    ------    ------
Primary earnings per share.........     $4.46     $2.86     $2.03
                                       ======    ======    ======

EARNINGS PER SHARE ASSUMING
 FULL DILUTION:
Net earnings.......................   $56,811   $35,873   $25,453
                                       ======    ======    ======

Average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding:
 Average common shares outstanding.    12,132    12,115    12,155
 Shares credited to deferred
  compensation plan participants...        98         -         -
 Dilutive effect of stock options..       716       630       387
                                       ------    ------    ------
                                       12,946    12,745    12,542
                                       ======    ======    ======
Fully diluted earnings per share...     $4.39     $2.81     $2.03
                                       ======    ======    ======

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________

)

DEDMAS SANCHEZ, )

Petitioner, )

 )

v. ) CRIMINAL NO. 05-123-3

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

Respondent. )

__________________________________________)

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29 day of December 2009, upon review and consideration of Petitioner’s TH

pro se Motion for Restructuring Petitioner’s Term of Imprisonment [docket entry No. 735] and the

Government’s Reply [docket entry No. 736], it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion is

DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

______________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
No. 65475.

#### R. H. Elsbach & Co., Inc., and H. B. Thomas & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 59/31539 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chewing gum similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fred L. Strauss*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 136, C.D. 2117), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 4.7

                     PLEDGED SHARE AMENDMENT


     This Pledged Share Amendment, dated as of August 1, 1994, is delivered
pursuant to Section 5 of the Pledge Agreement referred to below.  The
undersigned hereby agrees that this Pledged Share Amendment may be attached
to the Pledge Agreement dated as of May 26, 1992, between the undersigned
and Chemical Bank, as Trustee, as amended from time to time (the "Pledge
Agreement", capitalized terms defined therein being used herein as therein
defined), and that the attached Schedule I shall replace in its entirety
Schedule I to the Pledge Agreement.

                    UNITED STATES
                    BANKNOTE CORPORATION

                    By:S/ Harvey J. Kesner
                    Title:  Sr. Vice President

                            SCHEDULE I

Attached to and forming a part of that certain Pledge Agreement dated as of
May 26, 1992, by United States Banknote Corporation, as Pledgor, to Chemical
Bank, as Trustee, as amended from time to time.

                                                               Percentage of
                              Stock                            All Capital
                    Class of  Certificate  Par     Number of   Stock
Stock Issuer        Stock     Number       value   Shares      Outstanding

American Bank
Note Company        Common    4            $5.00   100          100%

American Bank Note
Holographics, Inc.  Common    8, 9, 11     $0.01   10,000       100%

NMI Corporation     Common    3            $0.01   1,000        100%

ABN Investments,
Inc.                Common    1            $1.00   10           100%

United States Banknote
Corporation,
International       Common    1            $0.01   100          100%
# 4

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2024-01	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 11/29/23

# 47

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2024-01	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 11/29/23

# 65

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2024-01	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 11/29/23

# 220

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2024-01	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 11/29/23
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  116,321
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,338
<INVENTORY>                                    133,986
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               266,683
<PP&E>                                          91,603
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,330
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 439,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           83,669
<BONDS>                                        313,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   439,808
<SALES>                                        116,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,168
<CGS>                                           80,804
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   80,804
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,805<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   292
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,154
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,567)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (121)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,303)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,303)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F2>
<FN>
<F2>
<F1>Product development expenses.
<F2>The Company's shares are not publicly traded.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00616

- CV

In the INTEREST OF D.S. , a Child

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 02108

Honorable Fred Shannon, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order of Termination

signed July 18, 2013, is AFFIRMED.

We order no costs assessed against appellant because he is indigent.

S IGNED January 15 , 2014.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 180 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 180 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 180 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 180 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 180 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 5 of 5
20-F










Exhibit 10.1  



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 



The Board of Directors  

B.V.R Systems (1998) Ltd.  



We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-125879 and No. 333-140937 on Form S-8 of
B.V.R Systems (1998) Ltd. (the “Company”) of our report dated June 29, 2008,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiary as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes
in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period
ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007. 



Our report on the consolidated
financial statements refers to a restatement in the US GAAP net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2006. 



Somekh Chaikin

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Member firm of KPMG International

June 29, 2008
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-11	&"Arial,Bold"VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"September 2023
April 5, 1948

No. 52254.

Suit 4581.

#### United States *v.*Joseph Fischer as Liquidating Agent of Schmoll Fils Assd., Inc., et al.

Reap. Dec. 6950 reversed and remanded January 6, 1948 C. A. D. 377.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000050471
<NAME>                        AmeriNet Group.com, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                          38,426
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   125,259
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                178,295
<PP&E>                          367,201
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  2,121,765
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           255,053
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        124,652
<OTHER-SE>                      11,469,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    2,121,765
<SALES>                         255,053
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                255,053
<CGS>                           210,293
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   5,163,710
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                86,286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              148,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (7,251,389)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (5,353,836)
<DISCONTINUED>                  (1,897,553)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (7,251,389)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (0.74)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.74)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

ALEXANDRIA DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 1:01cr455 (LMB)

)

ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI )

a/k/a “Shaqil,” )

a/k/a “Abu Khalid )

al Sahrawi,” )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in open court, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Defendant’s Memorandum in Support of His

Motion to Dismiss the Death Notice and for Other Relief (Docket

#1677) be and is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion

is GRANTED to the extent that the government is precluded from

introducing aviation related evidence, including witness

testimony and exhibits. The motion is DENIED to the extent that

the death notice is not dismissed. 

The Clerk is directed to forward copies of this Order to

counsel of record.

Entered this 14 day of March, 2006. th

 /s/

 

Leonie M. Brinkema

United States District Judge

Alexandria, Virginia
No. 57244.

protests 517920-G, etc. (New York).

#### Continental Fur Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission [FR ID 185692]
 The following items were adopted by the Commission on November 13, 2023 and deleted from the list of items scheduled for consideration at the Wednesday, November 15, 2023, Open Meeting. The items were previously listed in the Commission's Sunshine Notice on Wednesday, November 8, 2023. 5
WIRELESS
                             TELECOMMUNICATIONS
*TITLE:*
                             Amending Amateur Radio Rules for Greater Flexibility in Data Communications (WT Docket No. 16-239).
                             
                                *SUMMARY:*
                                 The Commission will consider a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that would eliminate the symbol rate (also known as baud rate) limitation and establish a bandwidth limitation that would provide flexibility to use modern digital emissions, thereby promoting innovation and experimentation in the amateur service. The item would also propose removal of the baud rate limitation in several additional bands.6
WIRELINE
                             COMPETITION
*TITLE:*
                             Reducing Regulatory Requirements for Rural Provider of Long-Distance Access Service (WC Docket No. 22-407).
                             
                                *SUMMARY:*
                                 The Commission will consider a Declaratory Ruling and Memorandum Opinion and Order that would grant the Minnesota Independent Equal Access Corporation (MIEAC) relief from dominant carrier regulation with respect to its provision of centralized equal access (CEA) service, and regulate MIEAC as a non-dominant competitive LEC for this service going forward. In light of declining demand, intervening exchange access service regulatory reforms, and technological changes in the voice services marketplace generally, dominant carrier regulation of MIEAC's CEA service is no longer necessary to serve the public interest.
 Federal Communications Commission. Marlene Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2023-25518 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P