alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case No. 13,129.

#### SMITH v. WOODWARD et al.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 226.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1821.

Practice at Law — Consolidation or Cases.

If the writ be issued against two defendants, and one only be taken on the first writ, and the other be afterwards taken on an alias or pluries, the cause against the defendant first taken will be consolidated with that against the other defendant, although there may have been the intermission of a term between the issue of the first and second or other writ.

[See Case No. 5,253.]

Mr. Law, for plaintiff,

moved the court to consolidate the suit against Woodward with that against Yerby.

Mr. Taney, for defendant,

objected that the writ against Yerby had not been regularly continued. The object of the plaintiff is to avoid the plea of limitation. The docket, however, showed the connection, and the proceedings were ordered to be consolidated into one cause.

The first writ issued against Woodward & Yerby in 1818. Woodward only was taken. The writ was not renewed against Yerby until several terms after, when a writ was issued against him, upon which he was taken.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 *



In connection with the quarterly report of Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dov A. Goldstein, M.D., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 5, 2005 |  | /s/ DOV A. GOLDSTEIN, M.D.                          
|                     |  | Dov A. Goldstein, M.D.                              
|                     |  | Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer



This certification
accompanies this quarterly report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

---

|* | A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and will be retained by Vicuron Pharmaceuticals Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# March 2015

# April 2015

# May 2015

# June 2015

# July 2015

# August 2015

# September 2015

# October 2015

# November 2015

# December 2015
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

46 TAS Restrictions for Non-Federal Exceptions

Federal Non-Federal Code domain value E (Non-Federal exceptions) is restricted to specific TAS Fail

FEDERAL 

NONFEDERAL 

INDICATOR Fund Family

=E <>0131440

=E <>0140803=E <>0141610

46E TAS Restrictions for Non-Federal Exceptions

Federal Non-Federal Code domain value E (Non-Federal exceptions) is restricted to specific TAS

FEDERAL 

NONFEDERAL 

INDICATOR

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Fail E

01420092010 

2100000

Fail E

01420092011 

2100000

Fail E

01420102010 

2100000

Fail E

01420102011 

2100000

Fail E

01420112011 

2100000

Fail E

05720082010 

3010000

Fail E

05720092011 

3010000

Fail E

05720082010 

3020000

Fail E

05720092011 

3020000

Fail E

05720102010 

3400000

Fail E

05720112011 

3400000

Fail E

05720092010 

3600000

Fail E

05720102011 

3600000

Fail E

06905720102010 

3400005

Fail E

06905720112011 

3400005

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Bulletin No. 2017-16 DRAFT VII VDR - 1 
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

51E

Backdated Transaction and Prior Year Adjustment

If a transaction has been backdated to a previous fiscal year in CARS, then the Prior Year Adjustment for the transaction is B. The Backdated Transaction field on the SMAF will be Y (yes) if a backdated transaction has been processed.

PRIOR YEAR 

ADJUSTMENT 

CODE

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Backdated 

Transaction

Pass B 075 X3966000 N

70E

Limited Use of USSGL 415100 with Authority Type Code "P"

The use of USSGL 415100 with Authority Type Code "P" is limited to specific Treasury Account Symbols.

BEA CATEGORY 

INDICATOR

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass M

02020172018 

5445000

89 Limited Use of USSGL 153200

The use of USSGL account 153200 is limited to specific TAS. Fail

USSGL 

ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

=153200

89E Limited Use of USSGL 153200

The use of USSGL account 153200 is limited to specific TAS.

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass 015 X6874000Pass 020 X6511006Pass 070 X6511004

Bulletin No. 2017-16 DRAFT VII VDR - 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BENITO JULIAN LUNA,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0627 KJM GGH P

vs.

SCOTT KERNAN, 

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel with a petition for

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 1, 2011, prior counsel assigned to

this case was relieved and new counsel was appointed, as it appeared petitioner’s federal habeas

petition was never filed even though the claims were exhausted several years ago in the

California Supreme Court. On September 27, 2011, new counsel provided a status report

indicating that the best way to address the statute of limitations issue would be for respondent to

be served with the petition recently filed by petitioner. Respondent was served and filed a

motion to dismiss on December 6, 2011. A hearing was scheduled for February 16, 2012,

however the parties filed a stipulation to move the hearing to March 23, 2012. The court’s law

and motion calendar is on Thursdays, therefore the hearing was moved to March 22, 2012, at

10:00 am.

1

Case 2:04-cv-00627-MCE-GGH Document 38 Filed 03/16/12 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

On March 14, 2012, the undersigned issued an order to show cause why the action

should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, noting that petitioner had not filed an opposition

to the motion to dismiss even though the opposition was due on March 8, 2012. See Local Rule

230(c). On March 14, 2012, petitioner filed a stipulation and proposed order to move the hearing

to April 12, 2012. Therefore, the order to show cause is discharged and the hearing is moved to

April 12, 2012. No further extensions will be allowed. Furthermore, petitioner’s opposition to

the motion to dismiss is due on March 26, 2012, and a reply, if any is due on April 5, 2012.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The order to show cause is discharged;

2. The hearing is moved to April 12, 2012;

3. Petitioner’s opposition to the motion to dismiss is due on March 26, 2012, and

a reply, if any is due on April 5, 2012.

DATED: March 16, 2012

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

GGH:AB

luna0627.ord

2

Case 2:04-cv-00627-MCE-GGH Document 38 Filed 03/16/12 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3999 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3999

  To require mandatory review of performance improvement plans during 
                tenure and promotion appraisal process.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2024

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require mandatory review of performance improvement plans during 
                tenure and promotion appraisal process.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MANDATORY REVIEW OF PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT PLANS DURING 
              TENURE AND PROMOTION APPRAISAL PROCESS.

    The Secretary of State shall ensure that the tenure and promotion 
appraisal process for any Foreign Service officer include a review of 
all Performance Improvement Plans that have been issued to such officer 
during the preceding 5-year period regarding performance that was 
considered unacceptable.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Alicia Borst Derrah, the Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and principal financial officer of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.








Date:  May 17, 2010                                                                                        /s/ Alicia Borst Derrah


Alicia Borst Derrah


Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DENNIS MARTEL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Defendants.

No. 2:04-CV-0014 DFL JFM P

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

DANN’S REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO

RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST

SET OF INTERROGATORIES

The Court has considered Defendant Dann’s request for a 15-day extension of time to

and including April 18, 2006, to respond to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories and finds good

cause to grant the request.

Defendant Dann shall serve his responses to Plaintiff’s First Set of Interrogatories on or

before April 18, 2006. 

Dated: April 7, 2006.

/001; mart0014.eot

Case 2:04-cv-00014-ALA Document 44 Filed 04/07/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8832]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3268]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


National Advisory Council Public Meeting

    The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) National Advisory 
Council public meeting originally scheduled for Tuesday, February 27, 
2007, will be cancelled and rescheduled to Wednesday, February 28, 2007 
at 2 p.m. The meeting will take place using an audio/web conference 
system. To participate, please call our toll free conferencing service 
at 1-866-740-1260 and enter access code 3711001 at the prompt. The 
purpose of the meeting is to provide and discuss recent updates 
pertaining to the delivery of the Agency's programs and services. 
Information will be presented by the staff of the SBA, members of the 
council or interested others. Anyone wishing to attend or to make a 
presentation must contact Mina Wales in writing, phone or e-mail in 
order to be put on the agenda. Mina Wales, NAC Designated Federal 
Officer, SBA Headquarters, 409 3rd Street SW., Washington, DC 20416, 
phone (202) 205-8414, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fc9195929dd28b9d90998fbc8f9e9dd29b938a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2845414649065f49444d5b685b4a49064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>. For more information 
about the National Advisory Council, see our Web site at http://www.sba.gov/nac/index.html.

Matthew Teague,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-3268 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 38 (Tuesday, February 27, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8718]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3355]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. AC07-63-000]


Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power Company; Notice of Filing

February 21, 2007.
    Take notice that on January 26, 2007, Cheyenne Light, Fuel and 
Power Company submitted a request for limited waiver of the accountant 
certification requirement (CPA Certification Statement) under sections 
41.10-41.12 of the Commission's regulations. Cheyenne Light, Fuel and 
Power Company requests waiver of the requirement to file a CPA 
Certification Statement for its 2005 FERC Form No.1-F.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must 
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be 
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to 
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or 
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to 
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a0c0f180905242623242f193f3a3a25383e0a2c2f3829642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="296f6c7b6a66474540474c7a5c5959465b5d694f4c5b4a074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: March 13, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-3355 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
August 10, 1950

No. 54600.

#### Perfection Import & Export Co. *v.*United States,

protest 130672-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

ID

Simple or

Special Name Type Description Error Message 

82 SPECIAL

Limited Use of USSGL 439701 Compound

The use of USSGL 439701 is limited to specific Treasury TAS.

This TAS is not authorized to use USS439701 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Summary

Bulletin No. 2016-XX DRAFT VII VSR - 1
# sec6_rsnc_2022

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSNC - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2022
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 70/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises

(2006/C 283/09)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)  STAKOD — Στατιστική Ταξινόμηση των Κλάδων Οικονομικής Δραστηριότητας (Statistical Classification of Fields of Economic Activity)

----
No. 50382.

Suit 4469.

#### Mary *G. Ricks*v. *United States.*

C. D. 809 affirmed May 24, 1945. C. A. D. 308.
NO. 12-22-00064-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TIMBER LAKE ESTATES PROPERTY 

OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., 

APPELLANT

V.

JAMES DRISCOLL AND CAROL 

DRISCOLL,

APPELLEES

§

§

§

APPEAL FROM THE 173RD 

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3. 

Timber Lake Estates Property Owners Association, Inc., filed a notice of appeal on April 

1, 2022. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Timber Lake’s docketing statement was due to have been filed at 

the time appeal was perfected. See TEX. R. APP. P. 32.1. On April 5, this Court requested that 

Timber Lake file a docketing statement within ten days if it had not already done so. Timber 

Lake did not file the docketing statement as requested.

 On April 21, the Clerk of this Court issued a notice advising Timber Lake that the 

docketing statement was past due. The notice provided that unless the docketing statement was 

filed on or before May 2, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3. The date for filing the docketing statement has passed, and 

Timber Lake has not complied with the Court’s request.

Because Timber Lake failed, after notice, to comply with Rule 32.1, the appeal is 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (after giving ten days’ notice, appellate court may dismiss 
2

appeal because appellant failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court 

order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time).

Opinion delivered May 18, 2022.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MAY 18, 2022

NO. 12-22-00064-CV

TIMBER LAKE ESTATES PROPERTY

OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellant

V.

JAMES DRISCOLL AND CAROL DRISCOLL,

Appellees

Appeal from the 173rd District Court

of Henderson County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No. CV17-0093-3)

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the appellate record, and the same 

being considered, it is the opinion of this Court that the appeal should be dismissed.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this Court that 

this appeal be, and the same is, hereby dismissed; and that this decision be certified to the court 

below for observance.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-04-143-CV

SALVATORE SPINELLI, INDIVIDUALLY	APPELLANTS

AND D/B/A THE LAW OFFICES OF 

SALVATORE SPINELLI, ESQ. AND AS 

A GENERAL PARTNER OF AND/OR D/B/A 

OXFORD MANAGEMENT SERVICES; 

OXFORD COLLECTION AGENCY, INC. 

IN ITS CORPORATE CAPACITY AND 

AS A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP AND/OR

ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES KNOWN AS 

OXFORD MANAGEMENT SERVICES

	V.

SHARON BROWN AND BILL BROWN	APPELLEES

	----------

	FROM 97TH DISTRICT COURT OF MONTAGUE COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

We have considered the parties’ “Joint Motion To Dismiss And Release Of Deposit In Lieu Of Supersedeas Bond.”  It is the court's opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss this appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f).

In accordance with the parties’ motion, the District Clerk of Montague County is ordered to release to appellant Salvatore Spinelli the deposit in lieu of supersedeas bond previously deposited with the Clerk by Salvatore Spinelli on May 12, 2004.

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM	

PANEL D:	HOLMAN, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

		        DELIVERED: December 16, 2004
Proposed additions and changes to USSGL accounts (Credit Reform Guidance) – effective 

FY 2021

Proposed New USSGL Accounts:

Account Title: Uncollected Subsidy from Program Account

Account Number: 422300

Normal Balance: Debit

Definition: The amount of subsidy due to a financing account but not yet collected from a 

program account. This account does not close at year-end.

Justification: USSGL account 422100 is used with reimbursable work; however, all financial 

activity recorded in a financing account is classified as direct.

Proposed Modifications to USSGL Accounts:

Account Title: Unfilled Customer Orders Without Advance

Account Number: 422100

Normal Balance: Debit

Definition: The total amount of unearned reimbursable orders accepted without an advance. This 

account represents the amount of goods and/or services to be furnished for other Federal 

Government agencies and for the public, if permitted by law and by long-standing, generally 

accepted practice. It also includes amounts for "jointly supported projects." At the time goods 

and/or services are furnished, the amount becomes reimbursements earned. In addition, this 

account is used in the credit financing fund to record the subsidy that will be received when 

previously obligated loans are disbursed. This account does not close at year-end.

Justification: To remove the definition line that discusses subsidy as it will be accounted for in 

USSGL account 422300.
Proposed Modifications to TCs:

C101 To record the transfer of recognized subsidy from the program fund to the financing fund. 

Reference: USSGL implementation guidance; federal Credit Reform Program Basic Accounting 

and Reporting Guide 

Budgetary Entry 

Debit 422100 Unfilled Customer Orders Without Advance 

Debit 422300 Uncollected Subsidy from Program Account

 Credit 407000 Anticipated Collections From federal Sources 

Proprietary Entry 

None

C103 To record the collection of subsidy costs in the financing account. 

Reference: USSGL implementation guidance; federal Credit Reform Program Basic Accounting 

and Reporting Guide 

Budgetary Entry 

Debit 427100 Actual Program Fund Subsidy Collected 

 Credit 407000 Anticipated Collections From federal Sources 

 Credit 422100 Unfilled Customer Orders Without Advance 

 Credit 422300 Uncollected Subsidy from Program Account

Proprietary Entry 

Debit 101000 Fund Balance With Treasury 

 Credit 138900 Allowance for Subsidy - Loans - Troubled Assets Relief Program 

 Credit 139900 Allowance for Subsidy 

 Credit 218000 Loan Guarantee Liability
No. 50367.

Suit 4491.

#### *Oxford University Press, New York, Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 857 reversed May 24, 1945. 'c. A. D. 309.
# sec5_sbr_2019

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2018-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10DRAFT V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout July 12, 2018
No. 56986.

#### H. W. St. John & Company *v.*United States,

protest 185362-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.