alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Unobligated Balances of Receipts and Appropriations Temporarily Precluded From Obligation

**Per OMB Circular No. A-11:**

1035 Unobligated balance precluded from obligation (limitation on obligations) (-)

In cases where the total budgetary resources are precluded from obligation in a fiscal year by a provision of law (such as a limitation on obligations), unobligated balance of mandatory appropriation or contract authority is also precluded in special and non-revolving trust funds.

***Current USSGL account:***

******

***Proposed USSGL Account:***

**Account Title:** Unobligated Balances of Receipts and Appropriations Temporarily Precluded From Obligation

**Account Number:**439701

**Normal Balance:** Credit

**Definition:** Based on situations where total budgetary resources are precluded from obligation in a fiscal year by a provision of law (such as a limitation on obligations), the amount of unobligated balances of receipts and appropriations that becomes unavailable for obligation until specific legal requirements are met is also precluded in special and non-revolving trust funds.

**Justification:** To support OMB Circular No. A-11. 

***TC:***

**NEW A124**To record unobligated balances of appropriations derived from special or trust fund receipts as temporarily precluded from obligation.  For this situation, the appropriation was available for obligation in the previous fiscal year but is not part of an obligation limitation in the subsequent fiscal year.

**Comment:**The balance in USSGL account 439701 should be reflected as part of the end-of year balance on Schedule N: Special and Trust Fund Receipts Schedule of the Budget of the United States Government. Trust and special funds whose authority is limited to the current year obligations will record this transaction at yearend as a preclosing adjusting entry.

**Budgetary Entry**

Debit 445000 Unapportioned Authority

Debit 462000 Unobligated Funds Exempt From Apportionment

Credit 439701 Unobligated Balances of Receipts and Appropriations Temporarily 

Precluded From Obligation

**Attribute Table:**

1 			IRC Handout 7-21-16

# image1.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             547
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,233
<INVENTORY>                                     25,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,952
<PP&E>                                          69,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,592
<BONDS>                                        125,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,674
<SALES>                                         70,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,939
<CGS>                                           52,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   321
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,607)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,241)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

     The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that
this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended March 31, 2004 (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                               By:/s/ Gary C. Loraditch
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Name:    Gary C. Loraditch
                                  Title:   President



                               By:/s/ Bonnie M. Klein
                                  -----------------------------------
                                  Name:    Bonnie M. Klein
                                  Title:   Vice President and Treasurer

Date: May 12, 2004
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Each of the undersigned officers of Oglebay Norton Company (the Company), does hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her
knowledge:



The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Annual Report.



DATE: March 29, 2004



|    |  |                                           
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL D.
LUNDIN                  
|    |  | Michael D. Lundin                         
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer     
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/    JULIE A.
BOLAND                    
|    |  | Julie A. Boland                           
|    |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is being
furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4820 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KENNETH J. BAILEY, for himself and as

executor of the Estate of Linda Jean

Weeks,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

UNION BANK RETIREMENT PLAN;

EMPLOYEE DEFERRED

COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT

PLANS ADMINISTRATIVE

COMMITTEE,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-55734

D.C. No. 5:12-cv-01754-R-SP

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Manuel L. Real, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Kenneth J. Bailey appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

FILED

NOV 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
in his action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974

(“ERISA”) for surviving domestic partner benefits and breach of fiduciary duty.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court’s

grant of summary judgment. Tremain v. Bell Indus., Inc., 196 F.3d 970, 975 (9th

Cir. 1999). Where an ERISA-governed plan grants discretionary authority to

determine eligibility for benefits or to construe the terms of the plan, we review for

an abuse of discretion the administrator’s interpretation of the plan, and de novo

the district court’s application of this standard. Tapley v. Locals 302 & 612 of the

Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs-Emp’rs Constr. Indus. Ret. Plan, 728 F.3d 1134,

1139 (9th Cir. 2013). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record. 

Johnson v. Riverside Healthcare Sys., LP, 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008). 

We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment on Bailey’s claim for

surviving domestic partner benefits under 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B) because

Bailey failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the plan

administrator’s denial of benefits was an abuse of its discretion. See McDaniel v.

Chevron Corp., 203 F.3d 1099, 1113 (9th Cir. 2000) (under abuse of discretion

standard, plan administrator’s denial of benefits must be upheld “if it is based upon

a reasonable interpretation of the plan’s terms and if it was made in good faith”). 

2 14-55734
Summary judgment on Bailey’s breach of fiduciary duty claim was proper

because Bailey failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the

failure to inform Bailey or his domestic partner of the registration requirement for

surviving domestic partner benefits was a breach of defendants’ fiduciary duties. 

See 29 U.S.C. § 1104(a) (setting forth standard of care and duties of plan

fiduciary); In re Oracle Corp. Secs. Litig., 627 F.3d 376, 387 (9th Cir. 2010)

(describing non-moving party’s burden to show specific facts demonstrating

existence of genuine disputes for trial).

AFFIRMED.

3 14-55734
IN THE UNITED STATES OF DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

 : MDL DOCKET NO. 1203 

IN RE DIET DRUGS : 

(PHENTERMINE/FENFLURAMINE/ : 

DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS : 

LIABILITY LITIGATION : MDL NO. 02-20143 

 : 

 : 

CYNTHIA ACOSTA, ET AL. : 

 : 

v. : 

 : 

AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS : 

CORPORATION, ET AL. : 

 : 

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 

 AND NOW TO WIT: This ____ day of _______________, 2005, it having been 

reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Ruby 

Merrick in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of 

the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby 

 ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Ruby Merrick 

in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named 

Defendants. 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court 

BY: ____________________________ 

Katherine Gallagher 

Deputy Clerk 

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 27 Filed 04/13/2005 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

SHIRK, et al. : 02-2635

WATSON, et al. : 02-2735

HOOD, et al. : 02-2736

HART : 02-2737

JOHNSON, et al. : 02-2738

KINIUK, et al. : 02-2845

HRYCYK, et al. : 02-3166

GREEN, et al. : 02-3168

SAKEWICZ, et al. : 02-3169

HENDRICKS, et al. : 02-3170

PALMER, et al. : 02-3171

SOLOMON, et al. : 02-3175

O’DONNELL, et al. : 02-3177

HARTMANN : 02-3448

ROCKS, JR., set al. : 02-3449

REED, III, et al. : 02-3450

GAMBLER, et al. : 02-3451

MACAULEY, et al. : 02-3452

ALIBERT : 02-3630

VISCO, et al. : 02-3631

DANCSECS, et al. : 02-3632

HAMMOND, et al. : 02-3847

POTTER, et al. : 02-3848

SMITH, et al. : 02-4095

SEARFOSS : 02-4096

GEARINGER : 02-4097

FRYE : 02-4101

MEYER, et al. : 02-4339

:

VS. :

:

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, :

INC. :

Case 2:02-cv-04339-MMB Document 3 Filed 08/02/2002 Page 1 of 2
-2-

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case or cases are referred to the Honorable

Charles R. Weiner for the purposes of the monitoring and the coordination of the status of

discovery, scheduling of arbitration hearings (if appropriate), settlement negotiations (if

appropriate), and scheduling trial dates (if appropriate), and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case(s) shall remain on the calendar(s) of the

judge(s) to whom they were assigned at the time of filing, until further order of this court,

and, it is further 

ORDERED that counsel for defendant(s) who filed a petition for removal of the

above-captioned case(s) to this court shall serve a copy of this Order on counsel for

plaintiff(s) in the above-captioned case(s), and, it is further

ORDERED that the relevant Prothonotaries of the Courts of Common Pleas located

within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania that the above-captioned case or cases have been removed from shall retain the

original records in these matters, pending further Order of this court.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________

JAMES T. GILES, Ch.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04339-MMB Document 3 Filed 08/02/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 60795.

#### Merchants Overseas Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 260440-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked-with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted; (2) the items marked with the letters “B” and “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted; and (3) the items marked with the letter “D” at 30 percent under the same provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802 and T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not cut or faceted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

GRACE LAWRENCE ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 vs. ) 

 ) Civil Action No. 02-CV-4440 

TRANS UNION, LLC ) 

 ) 

 and ) 

 ) 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 )

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE AND OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT 

TRANS UNION LLC’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Plaintiff, Grace Lawrence, through counsel, hereby opposes the Motion For 

Reconsideration of Defendant Trans Union, LLC. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying 

Memorandum of Law, the Motion should be denied. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. 

 

 BY: ____________________________ 

 JAMES A. FRANCIS, ESQUIRE 

 MARK D. MAILMAN, ESQUIRE 

 JOHN SOUMILAS, ESQUIRE 

Land Title Building, 19th Floor 

100 South Broad Street 

 Philadelphia, PA 19110 

 (215) 735-8600 

Dated: January 5, 2004 Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 43 Filed 01/05/2004 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

GRACE LAWRENCE ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 vs. ) 

 ) Civil Action No. 02-CV-4440 

TRANS UNION, LLC ) 

 ) 

 and ) 

 ) 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 )

ORDER

 AND NOW, this day of , 2004, upon consideration of 

Defendant Trans Union, LLC’s Motion For Reconsideration and Plaintiff’s Response And 

Opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 _____________________________ 

 Brody, Anita B., J. 

 

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 43 Filed 01/05/2004 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017374EN.01003101.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena and Banca Widiba v EUIPO — ING-DIBa (widiba)

(Case T-84/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark widiba - Earlier national word mark DiBa - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Inadmissibility of the appeal before the Board of Appeal - Request for restitutio in integrum - Duty of care))

(2017/C 374/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA (Siena, Italy) and Wise Dialog Bank SpA (Banca Widiba SpA) (Milan, Italy) (represented by: L. Trevisan and D. Contini, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and J. García Murillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: ING-DIBa AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: N. Gerling and M. Wolpert-Witzel, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 November 2015 (Joined Cases R 113/2015-2 and R 174/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between ING-DIBa and Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA and Wise Dialog Bank SpA (Banca Widiba SpA) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena SpA and Wise Dialog Bank SpA (Banca Widiba SpA) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CATHERINE SWANSON :

: Date: June 6, 2003

:

v. : Civil Action

: No. 02-2765

ALEGIS GROUP, L.P :

NOTICE

Your attention is called to Rule 41.1(a) of the Local

Rules of Civil Procedure.

We have ascertained from the record in the above matter

that no proceeding has been docketed therein for a period of more

than ONE (1) YEAR as of this date.

You are hereby notified that unless the court shall

otherwise order, upon written application filed within THIRTY (30)

DAYS from the date of this notice, and upon good cause shown, the

action shall be dismissed. In the absence of such application to

or order by the Court, the Clerk shall, without special order,

enter upon the record "Dismissed without prejudice under Rule

41.1", and shall, upon application by defendant, tax costs against

the plaintiff.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ

Clerk

By: 

 MATTHEW J. HIGGINS

 Courtroom Deputy

 

 

Notice to:

Andrea M. Deutsch, Esq.

450 N. Narbeth Ave.

Narberth, PA 19072

Case 2:02-cv-02765-RB Document 3 Filed 06/06/2003 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 for the Company's 1996 Stock Option Plan and 1996
Recognition and Retention Plan (Registration No. 333-83198) of our report dated
March 29, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements of First
Federal of Northern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2006 which appear
in this Form 10-KSB of First Federal of Northern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2006.

Plante & Moran, PLLC

Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 29, 2007
COLLECTED BY
Alexa Crawls
Alexa Internet
Wayback Machine
Alexa Crawls DR
No. 52236.

protest 135394-K (New York).

#### Pilot Radio Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of record changer units similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Garrard Sales Corp.*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 369). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3873 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility for Post-9/ 

11 Educational Assistance to members of the National Guard who perform certain full-time duty, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2024 

Mr. MORAN (for himself and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to expand eligibility 

for Post-9/11 Educational Assistance to members of the 

National Guard who perform certain full-time duty, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guard and Reserve 

5 GI Bill Parity Act of 2024’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3873 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF ELIGIBILITY FOR POST-9/11 EDU2 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO MEMBERS OF THE 

3 NATIONAL GUARD WHO PERFORM CERTAIN 

4 FULL-TIME DUTY. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3301(1) of title 38, 

6 United States Code, is amended— 

7 (1) by amending subparagraph (B) to read as 

8 follows: 

9 ‘‘(B) In the case of members of the reserve 

10 components of the Armed Forces— 

11 ‘‘(i) service on active duty (as defined 

12 in section 101(d) of title 10), inactive-duty 

13 training (as defined in section 101(d) of 

14 title 10), or annual training duty; or 

15 ‘‘(ii) service on active duty under a 

16 call or order to active duty under section 

17 688, 12301(a), 12301(d), 12301(g), 

18 12301(h), 12302, 12304, 12304a, or 

19 12304b of title 10 or section 3713 of title 

20 14, but not including inactive duty training 

21 (as defined in section 101(d) of title 10) or 

22 annual training duty.’’; and 

23 (2) in subparagraph (C)— 

24 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and in25 serting a semicolon; and 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
3 

•S 3873 IS

1 (B) by striking clause (ii) and inserting the 

2 following new clauses: 

3 ‘‘(ii) in the National Guard when per4 forming full-time National Guard duty (as 

5 defined in section 101 of title 32); or 

6 ‘‘(iii) in the National Guard when per7 forming active duty (as defined in section 

8 101 of title 32).’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date that is one 

11 year after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

12 (c) RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY.—The amend13 ments made by subsection (a) shall apply with respect to 

14 service performed on or after September 11, 2001. 

15 (d) APPLICATION OF TIME LIMITATION FOR USE OF

16 ENTITLEMENT.—Section 3321(a) of title 38, United 

17 States Code, shall apply to entitlement to educational as18 sistance acquired as a result of the amendments made by 

19 subsection (a) as if such amendments had been enacted 

20 immediately after the enactment of the Post-9/11 Vet21 erans Educational Assistance Act of 2008 (Public Law 

22 110–252). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB