alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
!"#$%&#'( $)#'**    !+!,!-. /0*#$#12234 ))&56$)#'7'8''&') "&.#'#9 # .  ' )#!+!,8)*#$ ' )#'&'#$12234/0*#$# ))&'"!&' #,&'5.#'')#"+#*' 6#,&:9###;" *  6#,& ,!9,.""# 8 *,&*$ 812234 ))&' * #,&' "*.3+-#* '&86))&28,!6*<&'*# != ! ) 28'>362?5 .6#,&:9###""+#*'*9###' *! *#9 #9 !! #,&' '')# *-#. ).856$)#'".' #,&' *')#,*#.* #!*9# )# !#9 ##85.6#,& ,! '.-'12234 ))&'( ))&#!'( * !, ! )#*#) '912234 ))&'.  $)#'&'9362"#$56!'(. ,!''.-! * #,&' $)#'&'"+#*9 ).12234 ))&"*#3625 .12234""# 8 ))&*  #.6#,& ,!'.-'.! * #,	 #) "&* . ' )#!+!. '&"""*&)# 9.@ABCBDACEFGHIJKILKMGNBAKGOPKCKGQRISGJBTGBK5.12234)''- !U' 9.9# )# !' '9).' #,&' ' %	 """#$." #)&! 9# )# !' !##'5 6#,&' !#U *<)#+'. 9&.*')#, 12234 ))&#*  '")#9#)"#$%: #+ !&'  !!9."''#,! + !#*).#)'-#.#  #,&5V "!(#9.#' *). # * ,!&). ## (.8&!8* #,&*')#,.W)!5 .+ !#** #+ !&'-#.#. #,&X)!Y-&!*,X*YX,!&5Y Z98&- *.*). #(.-&!*,*&' **## ! *<)#+' '&). '-#$.(.#$.('#[*')#,#5.#'#',) &'(#.#'  "!()!#'&$.&#%&!8#*#98.). #5.9(!8.' #,&' *.'* #+ !&'.  )'' 8&#%&!8#*#98. "#$%&# "" .)''- !U'5 \	 212234 ))&'*. +) # #,&'#.#'*)&9"#$"&"''( ,&*%&#.' #,&'9 ))&#$"&"''56 "!#'*-- * *<&''9 "#08 ,!#$ #'5V"#$"&"''(.9!!-#$122346))&'**. #,&' ,!9! $ #,&-#..* #+ !&'9*#) *#,&' ,!W12234 ))&' ]^_`aa(X:-- *6*<&''9b#0c 1" #*1*!#+*d*'ed,!#$ #'( ;)+#'(Y]^_faa(X:-- *6*<&''9b#0c b" #*g6*+ )*1*!#+*d*'e d,!#$ #'(;9&*'h!!)*(Y]i_`aa(X:-- *6*<&''9b#0c 1" #*:!#+* d*'ed,!#$ #'(;)+#'(Y *]i_faa(X:-- *6*<&''9b#0c b #* :!#+*d*'ed,!#$ #'(;9&*'h!!)*5Yj-+( 8 0*.' ))&')!' klmnopqr
	



					






 	! " #"		

	 $%
 	! " #

"		
&	 '( !
 $)*	! " #"		

	 $
 )%

*	! " #"		
&	 +$,

-		-	 
	-

 .


-+

/01234567 89:0;<=>0?



(	*	
		
@A(*@BCD(*@E



(
(	,A(,B CD(,E

FGHIJKLJ
# Bulletin No. 2018-04

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes(Consolidated)	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2018

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes(Consolidated)	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2018
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20105 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BOBBY NORRIS MCAFFEE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. (CR-H-92-137-18)

- - - - - - - - - - December 11, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Bobby Norris McAffee appeals the district court’s forfeiture order, arguing that the Government failed to prove the extent of his interest in two properties in Houston, Texas, and failed to prove that any interest that he had in these properties was acquired or maintained in violation of RICO. Only one of the properties is at issue on appeal because the district court vacated its order of forfeiture with respect to the otherNo. 95-20105 - 2 - property. McAffee also contends for the first time on appeal that the seizure of his property after his criminal conviction constitutes a violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause. Our review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The district court’s forfeiture of substitute assets was appropriate.
See 18 U.S.C.§ 1963(m)(2). The Double Jeopardy Clause did not preclude the Government from seeking the full range of statutorily authorized criminal penalties. See United States v. Halper , 490 U.S. 435, 450 (1989).
AFFIRMED.
This exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill

Congress’ goal in passing Section 333 (a) through (c) of the

Reform Act. This directs the Secretary of Transportation to

consider whether certain unmanned aircraft systems may

operate safely in the national airspace system (NAS) before

completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of

the Reform Act. I n making this determination, the Secretary

is required to determine which types of UASs do not create a

hazard to users of the NAS or the public or pose a threat to

national security in light of the following:

• The UAS’s size, weight, speed, and oper ational capability:

• Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and

populated areas; and

• Operation of the UAS within Visual Line of Sight

(VLOS) of the Pilot and Observers.

Reform Act §333

(a). Lastly, if the Secretary determines that such

vehicles “may operate safely in the national airspace

system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for

the safe operation of such aircraft in the national

airspace system.” Id. §333 (c) (emphasis added).

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA the

authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority

by its terms includes exempting civil aircraft, as the

term is defined under §40101 of the Act; that includes

sUASs, from the requi rement that all civil aircraft must

have a current airworthiness certificate.

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a

requirement of a regulation prescribed under

subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections

44702

- 44716 of this title if the Administrator finds the

exemption in the public interest. 49 U.S.C. §44704; 14

CFR §91.203 (a) (1).
# C_2017038EN.01005501.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/55

---

Order of the General Court of 5 December 2016 — McGillivray v Commission

(Case T-535/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 038/72)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eight Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F 12/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
----

|                     |   |                                                       |
|--------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      March 4, 2009 |   | /s/      Richard      A. Hubbell                           |
|                     |   | Richard      A. Hubbell                                    |
|                     |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                     |   | (Principal      Executive Officer)                         |
|                     |   |                                                       |
| Date:      March 4, 2009 |   | /s/      Ben      M. Palmer                                |
|                     |   | Ben      M. Palmer                                         |
|                     |   | Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                     |   | (Principal      Financial and AccountingOfficer)           |
No. 51381.

#### Protests 513099-G, etc., of B. F. Montague Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2017161EN.01002901.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v ERCEA

(Case T-348/16) (1)

1

((Arbitration clause - Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development and Demonstration Activities - Minatran contract - Eligible costs - Procedure by default))

(2017/C 161/41)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) (represented by: M. Pesquera Alonso and F. Sgritta, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 272 TFEU seeking a declaration that the debt in ERCEA debit note numbered 3241606289, of 26 May 2016, that the applicant repay part of the grant which it received for the Minatran project, a sum of EUR 245 525,43, is unfounded, and that that sum corresponds to eligible costs.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Declares that the debt in European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) debit note numbered 3241606289 of 26 May 2016, that Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis repay part of the grant which it received for the Minatran project, a sum of EUR 245 525,43, is unfounded, and that that sum corresponds to eligible costs; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Declares that the debt in European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) debit note numbered 3241606289 of 26 May 2016, that Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis repay part of the grant which it received for the Minatran project, a sum of EUR 245 525,43, is unfounded, and that that sum corresponds to eligible costs;

| 2) | Declares that partial recovery by way of compensation, to the amount of EUR 132 192,12 of the debt claimed is contrary to grant agreement No 211166 concluded on 18 August 2008 for the implementation of the Minatran project and to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Declares that partial recovery by way of compensation, to the amount of EUR 132 192,12 of the debt claimed is contrary to grant agreement No 211166 concluded on 18 August 2008 for the implementation of the Minatran project and to Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities.

| 3) | Orders the ERCEA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the ERCEA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
# List of Notes

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 02

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 03

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 04(1)

NOVEMBER 2023

# 04(2)

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 05

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 06

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 08

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 09

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 10

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 11

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 12

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 13

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 14

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 15

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 16

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 22

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023

# 23

&"Arial,Bold"NOVEMBER 2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KEVIN MITCHELL : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

TRANS UNION, LLC et al. : NO. 02-4439

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2003, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable Anita B. Brody to the calendar of the Honorable John P. Fullam, as related to Civil

Action No. 02-3812.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04439-JF Document 17 Filed 01/09/2003 Page 1 of 1
Order entered March 3 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 19
- 01205
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF E . H., A MINOR CHILD On Appeal from the 254th Judicial District Court

Da llas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 18
- 18908

ORDER In accordance with our February 24, 2020 order, appellant has provided written verification he has requested the reporter’s record

. Accordingly, we ORDER Janet Saavedra, Official Court Reporter for the 254 th Judicial District Court, to file the reporter’s record no later than April 3, 2020.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Ms. Saavedra and the parties.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JAMES ANDREW GRAY : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE :

COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE :

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE :

OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN KERESTES : NO. 05-2382

ORDER

NOW, this 19th day of August, 2021, upon consideration of petitioner’s Motion for 

Relief from Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (Doc. No. 47), his Supplement and 

Amendment for Relief from Judgment Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60 (Doc. Nos. 50 and 51), 

and the response, it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

/s/ TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE J.

Case 2:05-cv-02382-TJS Document 66 Filed 08/20/21 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

THE RITZ HOTEL LIMITED : CIVIL ACTION 

 Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant : 

 : 

 : 2:05-cv-04730 (NS) 

v. : 

 : 

 : 

SHEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY : 

INCORPORATED, : 

 Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff : 

 : 

 : 

MOTION OF SHEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY INCORPORATED TO TREAT 

THE RITZ HOTEL LIMITED’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIOMNY OF GARY 

KRUGMAN (DKT. 128) AS MOOT 

 Shen Manufacturing Company Incorporated hereby withdraws from its witness list the 

designation of Gary Krugman, and therefore, the Ritz Hotel Limited’s Motion to exclude 

testimony of Gary Krugman (Dkt. 128) should be dismissed as moot. 

Date: November 18, 2009 Respectfully submitted, 

 HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY 

 s/Frank J. Bonini, Jr./_______ 

 John F.A. Earley III, Esquire, 

 Frank J. Bonini, Jr., Esquire, 

 86 The Commons at Valley Forge East 

 1288 Valley Forge Road 

 P.O. Box 750 

 Valley Forge, PA 19482-0750 

 (610) 935-2300 

Attorneys for Defendant Counterclaim-Plaintiff 

Shen Manufacturing Company, Incorporated 

Case 2:05-cv-04730-NS Document 136 Filed 11/18/09 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Defendant Shen Manufacturing Company 

Incorporated’s MOTION OF SHEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY INCORPORATED TO 

TREAT THE RITZ HOTEL LIMITED’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIOMNY OF GARY 

KRUGMAN (DKT. 128) AS MOOT and PROPOSED ORDER were served on this 18th day of 

November, 2009, by sending the same electronically to:

Lile H. Deinard, Esquire 

Bruce R. Ewing, Esquire 

DORSEY & WHITNEY, LLP 

250 Park Avenue 

New York, New York 10177 

Christopher Scott D’Angelo, Esquire 

Christina D. Frangiosa, Esquire 

MONTGOMERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS LLP 

123 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19109-1099 

Mitchell R. Schrage, Esquire 

R. Tali Epstein, Esquire 

Kasowitz, Benson, Torres & Friedman, LLP 

1633 Broadway 

New York, New York 10119 

 By: s/Frank J. Bonini, Jr./ 

Case 2:05-cv-04730-NS Document 136 Filed 11/18/09 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

May 27, 1968

No. P68/247.

protests 59/18805 and 60/2193 (Houston).

No. P68/248.

protests 60/22068, etc. (Boston).

No. P68/249.

protest 60/26141 (New York).

No. P68/250.

protest 60/31347 (Tampa).

No. P68/251.

protest 61/9082 (Philadelphia).

#### W. R. Zanes & Company *v.*United States, Advance Brokers, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States, Margro Trading Corporation *v.*United States, Heidemann Industries, Inc. *v.*United States, Margro Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

Beckworti-i, *J.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bicycles, with or without tires having wheels in diameter (measured to the outer circumference of the tire) over 25 inches, weighing less than 36 pounds complete without accessories, and not designed for use with tires having a cross-sectional diameter exceeding 1% inches and that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard &*Co., *Mangano Cycles Co.*(47 CCPA 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF

2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Dwayne Powell, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).



This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2005 (the Report).



By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement
is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                        |  |                               
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------------
|February 10, 2006 Dated |  | /s/ Dwayne PowellDwayne Powell
----

Action brought on 28 July 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Kingdom of Sweden

(Case C-333/06)

(2006/C 224/58)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J.R. Vidal Puig and K. Simonsson, acting as Agent)

Defendant: Kingdom of Sweden

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Article 16(3) of Regulation No 261/2004 requires the Member States to lay down effective, proportionate and dissuasive sanctions for infringements of the provisions of the regulation.

According to the information available to the Commission, the Kingdom of Sweden — by failing to lay down sanctions for infringements of the provisions of Article 14 of the regulation and nearly one and a half years after its entry into force — has not yet introduced a complete system of sanctions for infringements of the regulation.

----

(1)OJ L 46, 17.2.2004, p. 1.

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED KE LECHI LINARDON , App ellant ,
v. Cas e No

. 5D 21

- 2868 LT Cas e No. 2018-38162- COCI

THE CONDOMINIUMS A T GEORGETOWNE LAKE C ONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. ,

Appellee

.

______ ___ __________________________/ Decision filed November 1, 2022 Appeal from the C ounty Court for Volusia County , Wesley Heidt , Judge. Lane Weinbaum, o f

W einbaum, P.A. , Coral Springs , f or Appellant. Rober t D

. Robins, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. AFF IRMED.

EVAND ER , COHEN and EDWARDS , JJ., concur.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of The Art  Boutique,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period  ending  December 31 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report").  I,
Tsang Ping Lam, CEO of the company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief.

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.


                                         /s/ Tsang  Ping Lam
                                         --------------------------------
                                         Tsang  Ping Lam,  CEO

Dated:  April ____, 2007
----

Information communicated by Member States regarding State aid granted under Commission Regulation (EC) No 68/2001 of 12 January 2001 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to training aid

(2006/C 278/03)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Zaki Rakib,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for
the periods indicated.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: November 10, 2003



| | Zaki Rakib
Chief Executive Officer
| | ----------------------------------