alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 8140)

#### E. Dillingham, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 0-571.

(Decided July 24, 1952)

*Eric C. Gordon*for the plaintiff.

*Charles J. Wagner,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED as follows, between the Counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, concerning the merchandise referred to herein:

> *4471. This appeal to re-appraisement involves fifteen (15) bales of nylon waste synthetic fibre type 3 A of a net quantity of 5094.5 pounds, imported from Canada at the Port of Alexandria Bay, New York, on November 18th, 1949 by the plaintiff for the account of Hartford Spinning, Inc., of Unionville, Connecticut.

> 2. As to the merchandise herein, there is no foreign value thereof, as defined in Section 402 (a) and (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930.

> 3. As to the merchandise involved herein, there existed an export value of sixty (.60) cents per pound, United States funds net packed, which was the market value or the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Canada, the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States, plus when not included in such price, the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States.

> 4. The instant appealed to re-appraisement shall be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find tbe export value, as tbat value is defined in section 402 (d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, to be tbe proper basis for the determination of the value of tbe merchandise here involved, and tbat such value was United States dollars 0.60 per pound, net packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 65452.

#### Ecuadorian Panama Hat Co., Inc. (S. Stern Henry *&*Co.) *v.*United States,

protest 60/26511 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of straw hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Pollak Industrial Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 251, C.D. 1991), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 021

Attachment Name

CAS RN 1456803-12-5 Summary Molecular Weight Distribution and Percent Monomer Composition

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.I, Sec.B, 2a. (Chem 5)

Contains CBI

Report Number

 Sanitized Version
All CBI has been removed
Exhibit 4.4

CORUS BANKSHARES, INC.
SUMMARY OF SUBORDINATED DEBENTURES
AS OF               12/31/2005

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                               SPREAD TO
                    ISSUE        PRINCIPAL      3-MONTH         CALL        YEARS       MATURITY
                     DATE       OUTSTANDING     LIBOR *         DATE      UNTIL CALL      DATE
                  ----------   -------------   ----------    ----------   ----------   ----------
 <S>              <C>          <C>                   <C>     <C>             <C>       <C>
  Trust I         6/26/2003    $  28,351,000         3.05%   6/26/2008       2.5       6/26/2033

 Trust II         6/24/2003    $  20,619,000         3.10%   6/24/2008       2.5       6/30/2033

 Trust III        9/17/2003    $  46,392,000         2.95%   9/17/2008       2.7       9/17/2033

 Trust IV         11/24/2003   $  30,928,000         2.85%   11/24/2008      2.9       12/15/2033

  Trust V         12/17/2003   $  51,547,000         2.85%   12/17/2008      3.0       12/17/2033

 Trust VI         5/18/2004    $  25,774,000         2.60%   5/18/2009       3.4       7/23/2034

 Trust VII        9/20/2004    $  51,547,000         2.22%   9/20/2009       3.7       9/20/2034

Trust VIII        3/15/2005    $  25,774,000         1.74%   3/15/2010       4.2       3/15/2035

 Trust IX         6/23/2005    $  25,774,000         1.56%   6/23/2010       4.5       6/23/2035

  Trust X         9/15/2005    $  25,774,000         1.38%   9/15/2010       4.7       9/15/2035

 Trust XI         12/19/2005   $  25,774,000         1.33%   12/19/2010      5.0       3/15/2036
                               -------------
     Totals                    $ 358,254,000
                               =============
</TABLE>

* 3-month LIBOR reprices quarterly
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

Line 

No.

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Begin/ 

End

Fed/ 

NonFed

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Reporting 

Type Code

Addl. 

Info.

8

8.1

8.1 572000 Financing Sources Transferred In Without Reimbursement E F E/U

8.1 577500 Non-Budgetary Financing Sources Transferred In E F E/U

8.2

8.2 573000 Financing Sources Transferred Out Without Reimbursement E F E/U

8.2 577600 Non-Budgetary Financing Sources Transferred Out E F E/U

8.3

8.3 578000 Imputed Financing Sources E F E/U

8.4

8.4 599000 Collections for Others - Statement of Custodial Activity E G E/T E E/U 6

8.4 599300 Offset to Non-Entity Collections - Statement of Changes in Net Position E G E E/U 6

8.5

8.5 599100 Accrued Collections for Others - Statement of Custodial Activity E G E/T E E/U 6

8.5 599400 Offset to Non-Entity Accrued Collections - Statement of Changes in Net Position E G E E/U 6

8.6

8.6 579000 Other Financing Sources E G D/E E / U

8.6 579001 Other Non-Budgetary Financing Sources for Debt Accruals/Amortization E G U

Section VI

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Statement Of Operations and Changes in Net Position

Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

Other financing sources:

Transfers-in without reimbursement (RC 18) - Footnote 1

Transfers-out without reimbursement (RC 18) - Footnote 1

Imputed financing sources (RC 25) - Footnote 1

Non-entity collections transferred to the General Fund of the U.S. Government (RC 44)

Accrual for non-entity amounts to be collected and transferred to the General Fund of the U.S. Government 

Other non-budgetary financing sources for debt accruals/amortization (RC 37) - Footnote 1

Bulletin No. 2021-12 VI RSOCNP IRC Handout February 10, 2021
O

374%

flt 1

A UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECflON AGENCY

/ REGION IX ‘t 75 Hawthorne Street

San Franclaco, CA 941054901

MAR 1 2 2013

Eric Massey

Director, Air Quality Division

Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality

1110 West Washington St

Phoenix, 4rizona 85007

Dear Mr.114aSsey:

On ocher 29,2012, the Arizona Department ofEnvironmental Quality (ADEQ) submitted

revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). We havc reviewed materials submitted

with ADEQ’s submittal ofrevisions to its New Source Review regulations (2012 New Source

Review State Implementation Plan Submission) and found that they do not fulfill the completeness

criteria in 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V. Specifically, while the submittal includes an

underline/strikeout version ofChapter 2 showing the revisions you propose to make to the SIP. the

submittal does not include a clean final version ofthe regulations. which is a requirement under

our completeness criteria. Therefore we must deem the submittal incomplete. Please amend the

submittal by submitting a clean final version ofthe proposed regulations when it becomes

available. We will continue to review the current submittal, but we cannot propose any actions

until your submittal is complete.

Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Roger Kohn at (415) 972-3973

or kohn.rogerepa.gov.

Sincerely,

Deborah Jordan

Director, Air Division

Saud a., Recycled Riper
No. 60800.

#### L. D. Friedland *v.*United States,

protest 207967-K (Savannah).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-5 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 1 of 2

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 27 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 27-5 Filed 05/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
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	

 @	ABCD	 ./0)E !'- ')$11 %3<2%+E)<,EFFE)<GH ./0)E !'- 'I '!<2%+EI<, EFFEI<GH ./0)J-'")$11 %3<2%+J)<, EFFJ)<GH ./0)J-'"I '!<2%+JI<, EFFJI<GH ./0);!"'J-'"<2%+;J<, EFF;J<GH KLMNOPQO
CERTIFICATE
      OF AMENDMENT

    OF

    CERTIFICATE
      OF INCORPORATION

    OF

    DIET
      COFFEE, INC.

     

    Diet
      Coffee, Inc., a corporation duly organized and existing under the General
      Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “Corporation”), does hereby
      certify the following:

     

    I. The
      amendment to the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation set forth below was
      duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General
      Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and thereafter was duly adopted by
      the
      consent of the holders of a majority of the outstanding voting stock of the
      corporation in accordance with the provisions of Sections 228 and 242 of the
      General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

     

    II.       Article
      FIRST of the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation is amended to read in
      its entirety as follows:

     

    “FIRST:
      The name of the Corporation is Zevotek, Inc.”

    


    III.       Article
      FOURTH of the Corporation’s Certificate of Incorporation is amended by deleting
      the first sentence thereto and inserting the following in lieu thereof to read
      as follows

    


    “The
      total number of shares which the Corporation shall have authority to issue
      is
      1,010,000,000, consisting of 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
      $0.00001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and 10,000,000 shares of preferred
      stock, par value $0.00001 per share.

    


    Each
      fifty (50) shares of Common Stock,
      outstanding on the effective date of this Amendment shall be automatically
      converted into one (1) share of Common Stock and, in lieu of fractional shares,
      each share so converted shall be rounded up to the next highest number of full
      shares of Common Stock.”

    


    IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hereby duly executes this Certificate of
      Amendment hereby declaring and certifying under penalty of perjury that this
      is
      the act and deed of the Corporation and the facts herein stated are true, this
      25th
      day of
      June, 2008.

     

    
      	 	 	 
	 	
              DIET
                COFFEE, INC.

            
	 
 	 
 	 
 
	 	By:  	/s/ Adam
              Engel
	 	
              
Adam
              Engel, President
Before the Second Division,

December 17, 1942

No. 47810.

#### Petition 6165-R of S. H. Kress & Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The petition was dismissed.
Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 189 Filed 07/19/06 Page 1 of 6Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 189 Filed 07/19/06 Page 2 of 6Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 189 Filed 07/19/06 Page 3 of 6Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 189 Filed 07/19/06 Page 4 of 6Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 189 Filed 07/19/06 Page 5 of 6Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 189 Filed 07/19/06 Page 6 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

:

:

V. : CRIMINAL NUMBER 05-576-2

:

: CIVIL ACTION NOS. 16-3357,

SHAMEK HYNSON : 20-2636

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Shamek Hynson, the above-named defendant, hereby appeals 

to the United States Court of Appeals for The Third Circuit from the denial of his Motion for a 

Reduced Sentence Under Section 404 of the First Step Act that was issued on June 3rd,2022 by 

the Honorable Juan R. Sanchez.

Respectfully submitted,

Steve Jarmon

Steve E. Jarmon

Attorney for Shamek Hynson
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Steve E. Jarmon, CJA appointed attorney, hereby certify that I have served a copy of 

the Notice of Appeal, by electronic notification via PACER upon Robert Zuazmer, Assistant 

United States Attorney, office located at 615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250, Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania 19106.

Steve Jarmon

Steve E. Jarmon

Attorney for Shamek Hynson

DATE: June 16, 2022
No. 51978.

#### Netherlands Purchasing Commission *v.*United States,

protest 114417-K/12723 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that duty was assessed on one case of surgical needles marked “R & C 291 334” and that it has since been verified by the customs officials that the said merchandise was not imported. The issue was held not to be whether or not there was a compliance with the regulations but whether or not there was in fact a nonimportation. *(United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.,*34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) followed. In accordance with stipulation and on the authority of the case cited the claim that no duty is assessable on the merchandise was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                      Exhibit 4


                NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                       AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                

       INSTRUMENTS DEFINING RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS,
                     INCLUDING INDENTURES


     The following instruments of Navistar Financial Corporation
defining  the rights of security holders, including indentures,
are incorporated herein by reference:

     4.1   Indenture, dated as of November 15, 1993, between
           the  Corporation and Bank of America Illinois, formerly
           known  as  Continental Bank, National  Association,  as
           Trustee, for 8 7/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due  1998
           for $100,000,000.  Filed on Registration No. 33-50541.














                                  E-2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

: NO. 05-369

v. :

: CIVIL ACTION

JOSEPH NOBLE : NO. 09-594

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2010, for the

reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

(1) the motion of Joseph Noble to vacate, set aside,

or correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED;

and

(2) a certificate of appealability is not issued.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III 

C.J.
**Part 2, Section I: Chart of Accounts**

The Chart of Accounts provides the basic structure for the U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL). It incorporates both proprietary and budgetary accounts. The proprietary and budgetary sets of general ledger accounts are self-balancing (the total debits equal total credits). It is important to note that central agency reporting requires a lower level of detail than the 6-digit USSGL account numbers provided. Therefore, the USSGL Board developed attributes containing various domain values that, when added to a basic 6-digit USSGL account, provide the appropriate level of detail needed for central agency reporting and, in effect, create new USSGL accounts. See Section IV for attribute definitions and domain values. It is this lower level of detail, the basic 6-digit USSGL account plus applicable attribute domain values, that agencies must capture at the transaction level to (1) comply with USSGL policy, and (2) achieve the desired result for proper reporting.

The basic 6-digit USSGL accounts are classified as follows:

# 100000 Assets

**200000 Liabilities**

**300000 Net Position**

**400000 Budgetary**

**500000 Revenue and Other Financing Sources 600000 Expenses**

**700000 Gains/Losses/Miscellaneous Items**

**800000 Memorandum**

Agencies may expand this numbering system to as many digits as necessary to accommodate agency- specific requirements. However, subsidiary accounts must summarize or “roll up” to the 6-digit USSGL accounts plus any related attributes.

In February 1999, the USSGL Board voted to delete summary accounts. However, agencies may summarize accounts as they find useful. Section headings replace many of the deleted summary accounts to maintain the integrity of the account structure.

Page 1 of 1

# image1.png
# Chernours f\ECE!VEO OPPT Ctl!C The Chemours Company Fluoroproducts 

## 2015 OCT 

## 26 AM 

## 6: 08 67 Canal Road, P. 0. Box 9001 Chambers Works- Pedersen Building Deepwater, NJ 08023



### October 16, 2015 

### Certified Mail- Return ReceiptRequested 7015 0640 0005 9657 6289 

### CBICControl Number



### Director, Chemical Control Division US Environmental ProtectionAgency Office ofPollution Prevention and Taxies EPA East Room4146 1201 ConstitutionAvenue, NW Washington, DC 20004


### RE: EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0012**~ •J-~·•4**  

### RECEIVED 

## NOV 13 2015 · EPA DOCKET CENTER



### Chemours Chambers WorlQl NJPDES PermitNo. NJOOOSlOO PFOADataSubmittal- OutfallDSN662 Weekly Grab Samples September 2015 SampleData
Dear Chemical Control Division: 

# 366696

Attachedpleasefind summaries ofPFOA analytical results for the Chemours Chambers Works weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in September2015.

In accordance withthe cmTent site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are providedto NJDEP ona monthlybasis viaelectronic discharge monitoringreports. The enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies ofthe analytical results from this monitoringperiod.
NJDEP has asked The Chemours Company FC, LLC to analyze for and report monthly Spot 662 PFNA concentrations for the next 12 months. The third ofthe requested 12 samples is reportedinthe attached table.

EnclosuresAnalyte PFOA PFNA

I Sample 10 Date Top (ft) Total (D/ Bottom (ft) units Diss. (D) Duplicate# ug/L T ug/L T Summary ofAnalytical Results 662- September 2015

662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 9/8/15 9114/15 9/21/15 9/28/15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 11 2.65 3.211 2.56 2.66

NA NA 0.234 NA

PFNA- Perfluorononanoic Acid PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid ug/L = micrograms per Liter ug/L- micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) LOQ = limit ofquantification = 0.100 ug/L 1 NA - not analyzed L I Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 9/21115. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported results for the sample collected on 9/21/15 represent the average of lab duplicate results. I I I I The NJDEP lab certification numberfor Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. I I I I i

< and NO = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 Copy of cwk 662 grab results_sep15.xls:Sheet1 10116/2015 2:12PM
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, Joseph J. Bouffard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 28, 2007



/s/ Joseph J. BouffardJoseph J. BouffardPresident(Principal Executive Officer)
Case 2:05-cv-05934-MK   Document 11   Filed 03/08/06   Page 1 of 6

Case 2:05-cv-05934-MK   Document 11   Filed 03/08/06   Page 2 of 6

Case 2:05-cv-05934-MK   Document 11   Filed 03/08/06   Page 3 of 6

Case 2:05-cv-05934-MK   Document 11   Filed 03/08/06   Page 4 of 6

Case 2:05-cv-05934-MK   Document 11   Filed 03/08/06   Page 5 of 6

Case 2:05-cv-05934-MK   Document 11   Filed 03/08/06   Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I,
Steven  J. Cohen, President of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my knowledge:





(1)           The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.


Dated:  August
      19, 2008
              By:
              /s/ 
      Steven J. CohenSteven
      J. CohenPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)