alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1538 

To amend the Small Business Act to establish awareness of, and technical 

assistance for, the creation of employee stock ownership plans, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2017 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. RISCH) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To amend the Small Business Act to establish awareness 

of, and technical assistance for, the creation of employee 

stock ownership plans, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Small Business Em5 ployee Ownership Promotion Enhancement Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SCORE PROGRAM ASSISTANCE. 

7 Section 8(b)(1)(B) of the Small Business Act (15 

8 U.S.C. 637(b)(1)(B)) is amended— 

9 (1) by inserting ‘‘(i)’’ after ‘‘(B)’’; 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 1538 IS

1 (2) in clause (i), as so designated, in the first 

2 sentence, by striking ‘‘(SCORE)’’ and inserting 

3 ‘‘(referred to in this subparagraph as ‘SCORE’)’’; 

4 and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(ii) SCORE shall appoint an individual to 

7 serve as the SCORE Employee Ownership Di8 rector— 

9 ‘‘(I) whose duties shall relate to the 

10 various forms of employee ownership; 

11 ‘‘(II) who shall be responsible for— 

12 ‘‘(aa) administering and dis13 bursing materials that contain general 

14 information and technical assistance 

15 with respect to the establishment of 

16 employee ownership structures; 

17 ‘‘(bb) coordinating efforts with 

18 respect to employee ownership with 

19 the chapters of SCORE located 

20 throughout the United States; 

21 ‘‘(cc) providing technical assist22 ance relating to a range of business 

23 forms and strategies that promote or 

24 facilitate employee ownership, includ25 ing— 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 1538 IS

1 ‘‘(AA) an employee stock 

2 ownership plan; 

3 ‘‘(BB) a cooperative; and 

4 ‘‘(CC) any other approach 

5 determined appropriate by the 

6 SCORE Employee Ownership Di7 rector; and 

8 ‘‘(dd) providing the Adminis9 trator and the Office of Entrepre10 neurial Development with statistics, 

11 including regional statistics from a 

12 chapter of SCORE, relating to serv13 ices provided to small business con14 cerns potentially undertaking a form 

15 of employee ownership; and 

16 ‘‘(III) who may be an employee of the 

17 Administration as of the date on which the 

18 appointment is made.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
```

                                                         Exhibit 21

                   NAVISTAR FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                         AND SUBSIDIARIES
                ----------------------------------
                  SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                      AS OF OCTOBER 31, 2004

                                                        STATE OR
                                                       COUNTRY IN
                                                          WHICH
                                                       SUBSIDIARY
                                                        ORGANIZED
                                                     ------------------

Subsidiaries that are 100% owned by Navistar
   Financial Corporation:
     Navistar Financial Retail Receivables Corporation.   Delaware
     Navistar Financial Securities Corporation.........   Delaware
     Truck Engine Receivables Financing Co.............   Delaware
     Truck Retail Accounts Corporation.................   Delaware
     Truck Retail Instalment Paper Corp................   Delaware
     International Truck Leasing Corporation...........   Delaware

Subsidiaries  not  shown by name in the above  listing,  if  considered  in the
aggregate  as  a  single   subsidiary,   would  not  constitute  a  significant
subsidiary.
```
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

People of Ml v Dukota Lynn hananaquct 

Docket Nos. 318251; 318252; 318378; 320342 

l.C Nos. 10-003343-FH: 12-003755-FH: 12-003749-fH; 

13-003852-FJ-I 

llcnry William Saad 

Presiding Judge 

Donald S. Owens 

Kirsten Frank Kelly 

Judges 

On its own motion, the Court on.lers that the unpublished, per curiam opinion in this case, 

which was issued March 17, 20 15. be amended to correct a clerical error. 

rhc third sentence of the second paragraph (bortom of page I) shall read: ··rn that month. 

defendant accompanied her friend to a doctor·s office, at which her friend's children had an 

appointment." In all other respects. the March 17, 20 15 opinion remains unchanged. 

A true copy entered and certilied by Jerome W. Zimmer .Ir., Chief Clerk, on 

MAR 3 0 2015
----

----

I Informacje

Komisja

----

Komunikat Komisji w ramach wykonania dyrektywy 2004/22/WE Parlamentu Europejskiego i Rady z dnia 31 marca 2004 r. w sprawie przyrządów pomiarowych (1)

[Publikacja odniesień do dokumentów normatywnych sporządzonych przez OIML oraz wykaz ich części odnoszących się do zasadniczych wymogów (zgodnie z art. 16 ust. 1 dyrektywy)]

(2006/C 269/01)

(Tekst mający znaczenie dla EOG)

MI-001:   Wodomierze

w odniesieniu do:

MI-004:   Ciepłomierze

w odniesieniu do:

MI-005:   Instalacje pomiarowe do ciągłego i dynamicznego pomiaru ilości cieczy innych niż woda

w odniesieniu do:

MI-006, ROZDZIAŁ II:   Wagi automatyczne dla pojedynczych ładunków

w odniesieniu do:

MI-006, ROZDZIAŁ III:   Wagi automatyczne porcjujące

w odniesieniu do:

MI-006, ROZDZIAŁ IV:   Wagi automatyczne odważające

w odniesieniu do:

MI-006, ROZDZIAŁ V:   Wagi automatyczne przenośnikowe

w odniesieniu do:

MI-006, ROZDZIAŁ VI:   Wagi automatyczne wagonowe

w odniesieniu do:

MI-008, ROZDZIAŁ II:   Naczynia wyszynkowe

w odniesieniu do:

MI-009, ROZDZIAŁ II:   Przyrządy do pomiaru długości

w odniesieniu do:

MI-009, ROZDZIAŁ III:   Przyrządy pomiaru pola powierzchni

w odniesieniu do:

(Uwaga: OIML R136-1 dotyczy tylko określania powierzchni skór, natomiast MI 009 nie ogranicza się wyłącznie do skóry)

MI-009, ROZDZIAŁ IV:   Przyrządy do pomiaru wielu wymiarów

w odniesieniu do:

MI-010:   Analizatory spalin samochodowych

w odniesieniu do:

----

(1)Dz.U. L 135 z 30.4.2004.

----
# Part 2	Fiscal Year 2020 Reporting

**SUPPLEMENT	Section III**

**U.S. Standard General Ledger Account Transaction Categories**

**TRANSACTION**

**CODETRANSACTION DESCRIPTION**

# A. Funding

100 - 399	Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections 400 - 699	Authority Transfers

700 - 799	Reimbursables and Other Income

# B. Disbursements and Payables

E. **Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections**

100 - 399	Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499	Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above 500 - 799	Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

# F. Yearend

100 - 299	Preclosing Entries

300 - 499	Closing Entries

# G. Memorandum Entries

100 - 299	All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

# H. Other Specialized Transaction Entries

100 - 799	Other

# Bulletin No. 2019-10	III AC - 1	June 2019
----

----

III Informazioni

Agenzia europea per i medicinali

----

ASSUNZIONI PER L’AGENZIA EUROPEA PER I MEDICINALI (LONDRA)

(2006/C 254 A/01)

L’Agenzia ha la responsabilità di coordinare la valutazione e la vigilanza dei medicinali per uso umano e veterinario in tutto il territorio dell’Unione europea [cfr. regolamento (CE) n. 726/2004 del Parlamento europeo e Consiglio, del 31 marzo 2004, GU L 136 del 30 aprile 2004, pag. 1]. L’Agenzia europea per i medicinali (EMEA) è stata istituita nel gennaio 1995 e lavora a stretto contatto con la Commissione europea, i 25 Stati membri dell’Unione europea, i paesi SEE-EFTA e molti altri gruppi del settore pubblico e privato.

Ulteriori informazioni sull’EMEA e le sue attività sono disponibili al seguente indirizzo Internet: http://www.emea.europa.eu/

L’Agenzia europea dei medicinali indice una serie di procedure di selezione al fine di costituire elenchi di idonei per i seguenti incarichi:

I candidati prescelti saranno iscritti in un elenco di idonei e, a seconda delle disponibilità di bilancio, potranno ricevere un’offerta di contratto quinquennale rinnovabile alle condizioni di impiego degli altri agenti delle Comunità europee (Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea L 56 del 4 marzo 1968).

La sede di lavoro è Londra.

I candidati devono essere cittadini di uno degli Stati membri delle Comunità europee oppure dell'Islanda, della Norvegia o del Liechtenstein, e godere dei diritti politici.

L’elenco completo delle condizioni, la descrizione dei posti e l’atto di candidatura da utilizzare vanno scaricati dal sito web dell’EMEA all’indirizzo:http://www.emea.europa.eu/htms/general/admin/recruit/recruitnew.htmL’atto di candidatura deve essere debitamente firmato e datato e, unitamente ai documenti giustificativi, deve essere inviato entro e non oltre il 1o dicembre 2006 (fa fede il timbro postale) al seguente indirizzo:EMEA — Head of Personnel, 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, Londra E14 4HB, Regno Unito [Tel. (44-207) 418 84 00; fax (44-207) 418 84 16]

In futuro la Gazzetta ufficiale non sarà più inviata automaticamente con la mailing list. Chi desidera essere informato delle pubblicazioni è pregato d'iscriversi online all’indirizzo:http://www.emea.europa.eu/nella rubrica «Online Mailing Service».

----
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Indiana Michigan Power Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael
G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








February
26, 2010








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30407

GULF SEAFOOD COMPANY OF EMPIRE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-2781)

February 9, 1999

Before WISDOM, STEWART and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appellant Gulf Seafood Company of Empire, Inc., appeals the district court’s decision that

appellant’s sale of diesel fuel to a nearby business was not exempt from the excise tax otherwise

imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) § 409(a). The United States counterclaimed for the

balance of unpaid taxes owed by the appellant. Having reviewed the record, the applicable law, and

the briefs filed by counsel, we find no error in the judgment of the district court. For the reasons

excellently set forth in the district court’s ORDER AND REASONS, the judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4386 — Cinven Limited/Aero Invest)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 217/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDEDJune 30, 2010
    
    
    June 30, 2009MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST V
    
    
    FUNDING V, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST V
    
    
    FUNDING V, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    15,948
    
    
    $
    18,579
    
    
    $
    15,948
    
    
    $
    18,584Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    15,470
    
    
    
    15,948
    
    
    
    15,470
    
    
    
    15,948Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    15,470
    
    
    $
    15,948
    
    
    $
    15,470
    
    
    $
    15,948Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.16
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDEDJune 30, 2010
    
    
    June 30, 2009MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST V
    
    
    FUNDING V, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST V
    
    
    FUNDING V, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    31,897
    
    
    $
    37,161
    
    
    $
    31,897
    
    
    $
    37,173Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    30,940
    
    
    
    31,897
    
    
    
    30,940
    
    
    
    31,897Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    30,940
    
    
    $
    31,897
    
    
    $
    30,940
    
    
    $
    31,897Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10September 2020
(Part 2SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection IV) (U.S. Standard General Ledger - Account Attribute Definition Report)

 (Bulletin No. 2018-05) (IV ADR - 1) (June 2018)
No. 52563.

protest 79424-K (New York).

#### James E. Markham, Alien Property Custodian *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MARCUS RUBEN ELLINGTON, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0666 DFL KJM P

vs.

E.S. ALAMEIDA, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 13, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 99 Filed 06/09/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 13, 2006, are adopted in full;

and

2. Plaintiff’s November 16, 2005 and February 23, 2006 motions for preliminary

injunctions are denied. 

DATED: 6/8/2006

DAVID F. LEVI

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00666-RSL-JLW Document 99 Filed 06/09/06 Page 2 of 2
# C_2016279EN.01001401.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 29 April 2016 — Heike Schottelius v Falk Seifert

(Case C-247/16)

(2016/C 279/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Heike Schottelius

Applicant:

Defendant: Falk Seifert

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Can a principle of EU consumer law be derived from the second indent of Article 3[(5)] of Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees (1) to the effect that for all transactions in respect of consumer goods between non-consumers and consumers it is sufficient, in order to claim secondary rights under a warranty, that the non-consumer with warranty obligations has not completed the remedy within a reasonable time, and there is no requirement in that respect that a period of time for removing the defect be fixed expressly, and that the relevant provisions of national law, for instance also in the case of a contract for work on consumer goods, should be interpreted accordingly and if necessary applied restrictively?

1

---

(1)  OJ L 171, 7.7.1999, p. 12.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0596

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH JOHN MCNAMARA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 30, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 23 2021

07/23/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0596
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:The CRonicle [electronic resource] /**** 
SuDocNumber:S1.155:
ItemNumber:0876-A-20(online)
CGPsystem Number:000584842
 
2001_1st.pdf
2001_2nd.pdf
2001_3rd.pdf
2002_2nd.pdf
2002_4th.pdf
2003_1st.pdf
2003_2nd.pdf
2003_3rd.pdf
2003_4th.pdf
2004_1st.pdf
2004_2nd.pdf**
Exhibit 23

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


                We have issued our reports dated December 12, 2007, which
contained an emphasis of matter paragraph related to the Company's liquidity,
accompanying the consolidated financial statements and schedule in the Annual
Report of Innovex, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended
September 29, 2007. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statements of Innovex, Inc. and subsidiaries on
Forms S-8 (File No. 33-14776, effective June 3, 1987, File No. 33-27530,
effective March 17, 1989, File No. 33-59035, effective May 2, 1995, File No.
333-10045, effective August 13, 1996, File No. 333-10047, effective August 13,
1996, File No. 333-79427, effective May 27, 1999, File No. 333-37380, effective
May 19, 2000, File No. 333-68228, effective August 23, 2001, File No. 333-83452,
effective February 27, 2002 and File No. 333-112648, effective February 10,
2004) and Forms S-3 (No. 333-106734, effective July 22, 2003 and File No.
333-121981, effective January 12, 2005).


/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
----------------------

Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 12, 2007

                                       5
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

SACINO BERTOLINO

HALLISSY & RALEY

A Professional Corporation

740 University Ave., Ste. 100

Sacramento, CA 95825-6751

Telephone (916) 649-2214

RICHARD P. BERTOLINO, State Bar Number 091593

Attorney for Defendants MARK FUKUHARA, DOUGLASBURLAND, JOESILVA,STEVEN

LEACH, DAN SALOMON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

_________________________________

OPHTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS, a

California Corporation, 

Plaintiff,

v.

MARK FUKUHARA, an individual,

DOUGLAS BURLAND, an individual,

MICHAEL GERKOVICH, an individual,

STEVEN LEACH, an individual,

EDMUND PETERSON, an individual,

DAN SALOMON, an individual, DALE

BRODSKY, an individual,

EYEPICTURES, INC. a Missouri

Corporation, JUSTICE OPHTHALMICS,

INC., a Tennessee Corporation, ZETA

DEVELOPMENT LABS, INC., a

Tennessee Corporation, JOHNNY

JUSTICE, JR., an individual, DOES ONE

through TEN, 

Defendants.

________________________________

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. CV. S-04-0482 LKK DAD

NOTICE AND SUBSTITUTION OF

ATTORNEY AND ORDER

TO THIS HONORABLE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendant DAN SALOMAN substitutes Richard P.

Bertolino of Sacino, Bertolino, Hallissy & Raley as his attorney of record in this action in

place of Daniel Maguire of Maguire Law Office, 423 E St., Davis, CA 95616 and Anthony

DeCristoforo of Wilke, Fleury, et.al., 400 Capitol Mall, 22nd Fl., Sacramento, CA 95814. 

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 154 Filed 09/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 2 -

Dated: By: /s/ Dan Salomon 

DAN SALOMON

I consent to this substitution. 

Dated: By: /s/ Daniel Maguire

DANIEL MAGUIRE

I consent to this substitution. 

Dated: By: /s/ Anthony DeCristoforo

ANTHONY DECRISTOFORO 

I accept this substitution. 

Dated: By: /s/ Richard P. Bertolino

RICHARD P. BERTOLINO

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

Dated: September 12, 2005. /s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 154 Filed 09/13/05 Page 2 of 2
ACCEPTED

12-16-00331-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

11/27/2017 12:23 PM

Pam Estes

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/27/2017 12:23:28 PM PAM ESTES Clerk
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0307

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ROBERT MICHAEL ZERMENO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including October 6, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 30 2023

08/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0307