alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Part 2 Fiscal Year 2024 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section III

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Account Transaction Categories

TRANSACTION

CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION

Bulletin No. 2023-02 III AC - 1 December 2022

A. Funding

100 - 399 Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections

400 - 699 Authority Transfers

700 - 799 Reimbursables and Other Income

B. Disbursements and Payables

100 - 299 Payments/Purchases

300 - 399 Commitments/Undelivered Orders/Expended Authority - Unpaid

400 - 599 Payables/Accrued Liabilities

600 - 699 Advances and Prepayments

C. Collections and Receivables

100 - 399 Receipts

400 - 599 Receivables/Accrued Revenue

600 - 799 Asset Sale and Disposition (Gains and Losses)

D. Adjustments/Write-offs/Reclassification

100 - 299 Upward and Downward Adjustments

300 - 399 Prior-Period Adjustments

400 - 499 Write-offs

500 - 799 Reclassification/Revaluation

E. Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections

100 - 399 Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499 Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above

500 - 799 Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

F. Yearend

100 - 299 Preclosing Entries

300 - 499 Closing Entries

G. Memorandum Entries

100 - 299 All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

H. Other Specialized Transaction Entries

100 - 799 Other
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDEDMarch 31, 2011
    
    
    March 31, 2010MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV,L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV,L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    8,552
    
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    8,552Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    7,120
    
    
    
    7,340
    
    
    
    7,120
    
    
    
    7,340Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    7,120
    
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    7,120
    
    
    $
    7,340Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: CRIMINAL NO. 05-532

v. :

: CIVIL NO. 11-4374

ANTHONY SPRUILL :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 8 day of September , 2015, upon consideration of th

Petitioner’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 109), and all memoranda and exhibits

submitted in support and opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s Habeas Corpus Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED;

2. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue. 

3. Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

 

R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J. 

Case 2:05-cr-00532-RBS Document 128 Filed 09/09/15 Page 1 of 1
No. 66308.

#### Authentic Furniture Products *v.*United States,

protests 60/4220, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall shelves similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Fabry Associates, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 88, C.D. 2203), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1


                      Park City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                            Certification Pursuant To
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Randall K. Fields,
Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated: October 13, 2005


/s/ Randall K. Fields
-------------------------
Chief Executive Officer


                  (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas W. Perry, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Merrill Lynch
& Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ THOMAS W. PERRY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Thomas W. Perry *
                              Title:   Chief Accounting Officer and Controller,
                                       Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 14, 2009
_____________________

*  Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 23





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






Board of Directors and Shareholders of


Park City Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries


Park City, Utah






We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 and Form S-3, of Park City Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries of our reports dated September 15, 2010 and September 24, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Park City Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the two years then ended, which report appear in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Park City Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.








HJ & Associates, LLC


Salt Lake City, Utah


September 13, 2011
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6455

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES STATON, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CR-96-15, CA-97-3745-17) Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Staton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James Staton, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Staton , Nos. CR-96-15; CA97-3745-17 (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Federal Register: March 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 46)]
[Notices]               
[Page 11223]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr10mr10-137]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6915]

 
Lifting of Nonproliferation Measures Against One Russian Entity

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: A determination has been made, pursuant to Section 6 of 
Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, as amended, to remove 
nonproliferation measures on one Russian entity.

DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela K. Durham, Office of Missile 
Threat Reduction, Bureau of International Security and 
Nonproliferation, Department of State (202-647-4930).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the authorities vested in the 
President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (``IEEPA''), the National Emergencies Act (50 
U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et 
seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and Section 6 of 
Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, as amended, a determination 
was made on March 1, 2010, that it is in the foreign policy or national 
security interests of the United States to remove the restrictions 
imposed pursuant to sections 4(b), 4(c), and 4(d) of the Executive 
Order on the following Russian entity, its sub-units and successors:

    1. Glavkosmos.

    These restrictions were imposed on July 30, 1998 (see 63 FR 42089).

    Dated: March 4, 2010.
Vann H. Van Diepen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and 
Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2010-5135 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

FANARO : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

UNUM LIFE : NO. 02-2772

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 3rd day of April, 2003, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable Jay C. Waldman to the calendar of the Honorable Herbert J. Hutton, subject to further

order of this court.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-02772-HH Document 15 Filed 04/03/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BLACKWATER SECURITY, |

CONSULTING, LLC, ET AL. |

Plaintiffs, |

| CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-CV-6020

v. |

|

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES |

INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. |

Defendants. |

ORDER

AND NOW, this _____ day of February, 2007, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motions

for Leave to File Reply Memoranda (Doc. 27, 28), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED

that Defendants’ Motions are GRANTED.

Upon consideration of Defendants Evanston, Fidelity, and Liberty’s Motion to Transfer

Venue (Doc. 20), Plaintiff’s responses (Doc. 26 and 29), and related filings (Doc. 22, 27 and 28),

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Petrese B. Tucker

____________________________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 32 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 1

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 32

Dockets.Justia.com
**EXHIBIT 32(ii)****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Local Telecom Systems,Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-KSB forthe period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Richard M. Hewitt, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operation of the Company.     /s/ Richard M. Hewitt       Richard M. Hewitt     Chief Financial OfficerDate February 16, 2006
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FREDDY CURIEL,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

 v.

AMY MILLER, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellee.

No. 11-56949

D.C. No. 8:10-cv-00301-DDPFMO

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 

Judge Pregerson did not participate in the deliberations or vote

in this case. 

FILED

AUG 25 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
# C_2017277EN.01004501.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 July 2017 — Bodson and Others v EIB

(Case T-508/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - EIB staff - Contractual nature of the employment relationship - Remuneration - Reform of the bonus scheme - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Manifest error of assessment - Proportionality - Duty to have regard for the welfare of staff - Article 11(3) of the Rules of Procedure of the EIB - Equal treatment))

(2017/C 277/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Jean-Pierre Bodson (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and the 450 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: initially, C. Gómez de la Cruz, G. Nuvoli and T. Gilliams, and, subsequently, T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, assisted by P.-E. Partsch, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decisions, contained in the bonus statements for April 2013, applying to the applicants the decision of the EIB Board of Directors of 14 December 2010 and the decisions of the EIB Management Committee of 9 November 2010, 29 June 2011, 16 November 2011 and 20 February 2013; and, secondly, an order that the EIB pay to the applicants a sum corresponding to the difference between the amount of remuneration paid in application of the abovementioned decisions and the amount of remuneration due under the previous system, or, in the alternative, the amount of remuneration due under the new scheme when correctly implemented, as well as compensation for the material damage resulting from loss of purchasing power and for the non-material damage which the applicants claim to have suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Jean-Pierre Bodson and the other members of the staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Jean-Pierre Bodson and the other members of the staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 274, 21.9.2013 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-61/13 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1512

DAWN SWIGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WEST LIBERTY UNIVERSITY,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

STEPHEN GRIENER, individually, and in his official capacity as President of West 

Liberty University; BRIAN CRAWFORD, individually, and in his official capacity 

as Provost of West Liberty University; DIANA HARTO, individually, and in her 

official capacity as Chief Human Resource Officer of West Liberty University,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:21-cv-00188-JPB)

Submitted: October 19, 2023 Decided: October 23, 2023

Before KING and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1512 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/23/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

ON BRIEF: Patrick S. Cassidy, CASSIDY LAW, PLLC; Timothy F. Cogan, COGAN 

LAW OFFICE, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellant. David L. Wyant, Thomas 

E. Buck, BAILEY & WYANT PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1512 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/23/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Dawn Swiger appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendant’s (1) motion to 

dismiss Swiger’s First and Fourteenth Amendment claims, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983; and (2) summary judgment motion on Swiger’s age discrimination claim, brought 

pursuant to the West Virginia Human Rights Act, W. Va. Code §§ 5-11-1 to 5-11-20. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. See Swiger v. W. Liberty Univ., No. 5:21-cv-00188-JPB (N.D.W. Va. 

Apr. 18, 2023). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1512 Doc: 31 Filed: 10/23/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1553 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1553

 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to list fentanyl analogues as 
                   schedule I controlled substances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2017

  Mr. Johnson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Controlled Substances Act to list fentanyl analogues as 
                   schedule I controlled substances.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stopping Overdoses of Fentanyl 
Analogues Act''.

SEC. 2. FENTANYL ANALOGUES.

    Section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812) is 
amended--
     (a) by adding at the end of subsection (b) of Schedule I the 
following:
            ``(23) Acetyl fentanyl 4-methylphenethyl.
            ``(24) Acrylfentanyl.
            ``(25) 4-fluorobutyrylfentanyl.
            ``(26) 4-fluoroisobutyryl fentanyl.
            ``(27) 3-furanyl fentanyl.
            ``(28) Isobutyryl fentanyl.
            ``(29) Meta-fluorofentanyl.
            ``(30) Methoxyacetyl fentanyl.
            ``(31) 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl.
            ``(32) Ocfentanil.
            ``(33) Ortho-fluorofentanyl.
            ``(34) Tetrahydrofuranyl fentanyl.
            ``(35) Valeryl fentanyl.''; and
    (b) by adding at the end of Schedule I the following:
    ``(e)(1) Unless specifically exempted or unless listed in another 
schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or preparation which 
contains any quantity of fentanyl analogues, or which contains their 
salts, isomers, and salts of isomers whenever the existence of such 
salts, isomers, and salts of isomers is possible within the specific 
chemical designation.
    ``(2) In paragraph (1), the term `fentanyl analogues' includes any 
compound structurally derived from fentanyl--
            ``(A) by replacement of the phenyl portion of the phenethyl 
        group by any monocycle, whether or not further substituted in 
        or on the monocycle;
            ``(B) by substitution in or on the phenethyl group with 
        alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, hydroxy, halo, haloalkyl, amino or 
        nitro groups;
            ``(C) by substitution in or on the piperidine ring with 
        alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, ester, ether, hydroxy, halo, haloalkyl, 
        amino or nitro groups;
            ``(D) by replacement of the aniline ring with any aromatic 
        monocycle whether or not further substituted in or on the 
        aromatic monocycle; or
            ``(E) by replacement of the N-propionyl group by another 
        acyl group.''.
                                 <all>
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 18

- 00719

- CV

In re Dunster Live, LLC

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Field , and Bourland

Filed: November 28, 2018