alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Ingles Markets, Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30,  2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald B. Freeman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

| ﻿                      |
|-------------------------------|
| ﻿                      |
| ﻿                      |
| /s/ Ronald B. Freeman

  |
| Ronald B. Freeman             |
| Chief Financial Officer       |
| January 26,  2018   |

﻿

﻿

The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit of the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing). 

			 		

			 		

----
Before the Third Division,

April 20, 1960

No. 64096.

protest 58/23585 (A) (Los Angeles).

#### Reliance Merchandise Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed'for lack of prosecution.
```

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.6

SUMMARY OF SPECIAL COLLECTIVE AGREEMENTS WITH EMPLOYEES

     On November 16, 2008, a new collective agreement was signed by us, the
Histadrut and our workers committee, in connection with the termination
arrangements of employees who are employed under the Bank's collective
agreements. This agreement was approved by the Supervisor of Wages and Labor
Agreements at the Finance Ministry and it replaces the previous collective
agreements that regulated the terms of termination of these employees. The
agreement of November 16, 2008 sets forth the right of management to dismiss
employees as part of the reduction in our activity, extends the validity of the
reductions that were agreed to in the past in connection with the wages of the
employees and the fringe benefits to which they are entitled, and grants various
benefits to employees in the event of dismissal (including resignations to be
treated as dismissals). According to the agreements, there are two termination
tracks for dismissed employees: a severance track and a pension track. A
dismissed employee in the pension track is one whose seniority is at least 20
years and who is at least 50 years old and who, upon dismissal is entitled to
early pension. A dismissed employee who does not meet these two conditions
together, belongs to the severance track, in which he is entitled to enhanced
severance pay. In the event of the privatization or liquidation of the Bank
and/or if the privatization is not implemented by December 31, 2009, then
immediately thereafter, employees are allowed to resign and be treated as if
they had been dismissed, but we have the right to require the employee to
continue working for an additional period of time. According to the agreement,
part of the termination payments to the employees will be deposited in trust
with a trust company. For this purpose, we engaged the trust company of an
Israeli bank which will serve as trustee. The collective agreement of November
16, 2008 will be in effect until the termination of the last employee to which
the agreement applies. The waivers and part of the benefits set forth in the
aforementioned collective agreement also apply and/or will apply to some of our
employees who are employed under personal contracts.

     We recorded appropriate provisions in our books for this agreement. The
agreements that were signed were approved by the Commissioner of Wages and Labor
Agreements in the Ministry of Finance.
```
Opinion issued March 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00219-CV

———————————

IN RE BAC TRAC PLUMBING, LP AND JOSE GRAJALES, Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators, Bac Trac Plumbing, LP and Jose Grajales, have filed a petition for 

writ of mandamus challenging the trial court’s separate orders (1) excluding the 

testimony of Thomas D. Greider, M.D. and Walter R. Sassard, M.D., and (2) 

denying relators’ subsequent motion for continuance of trial pursuant to Texas 
2

Rule of Civil Procedure 193.6(c).

* We deny the petition. Relators’ motion for 

emergency stay filed in conjunction with the petition is dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Bland, and Massengale.

 

*

The underlying case is Donna Dudley v. Bac Trac Plumbing, LP and Jose 

Grajales, cause number 2013-12224, pending in the 215th District Court of Harris 

County, Texas, the Honorable Elaine H. Palmer presiding.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARK JACKSON, :

:

Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY, et al. : NO. 05-4988

:

:

Defendants :

 

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY 

HARKINS CUNNINGHAM LLP AND ITS INDIVIDUAL ATTORNEYS

Plaintiff, Mark Jackson, by his counsel, hereby sets forth his Motion to Disqualify

Harkins Cunningham LLP and Its Individual Attorneys. For the reasons set forth in the attached

memorandum of law, plaintiff’s motion should be granted.

WHEREFORE, plaintiff’s motion should be GRANTED.

RICHARD J. SILVERBERG & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

BY: Validation of Signature Code RJS1716

RICHARD J. SILVERBERG

1500 Walnut Street, Suite 1500

Philadelphia, PA 19102

(215) 546-1110

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Case 2:05-cv-04988-JKG Document 165-1 Filed 06/02/08 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEFFREY LILY :

:

: CIVIL ACTION 

v. :

: NO. 02-CV-2784

:

ALDI, INC. :

AND NOW, this ____ day of May, 2004, the parties having executed and filed a

stipulation of dismissal pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement

of counsel without costs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

___________________

R. Barclay Surrick, Judge 

Case 2:02-cv-02784-RBS Document 15 Filed 05/14/2004 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 25 (Wednesday, February 6, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 8683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02685]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8178]

Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services

AGENCY: Department of State.

ACTION: Notice; FACA Committee meeting announcement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 
92-463, the Department of State gives notice of a meeting of the 
Advisory Committee on International Postal and Delivery Services. This 
Committee has been formed in fulfillment of the provisions of the 2006 
Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act (Pub. L. 109-435) and in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 6, from 
10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Location: The American Institute of Architects, Board Room, 1735 
New York Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20006.
    Public input: Any member of the public interested in providing 
public input to the meeting should contact Ms. Helen Grove, whose 
contact information is listed under for further information section of 
this notice. Each individual providing oral input is requested to limit 
his or her comments to five minutes. Requests to be added to the 
speaker list must be received in writing (letter, email or fax) prior 
to the close of business on March 1, 2013; written comments from 
members of the public for distribution at this meeting must reach Ms. 
Grove by letter, email or fax by this same date. A member of the public 
requesting reasonable accommodation should make the request to Ms. 
Grove by that same date.
    Meeting agenda: The agenda of the meeting will include a review of 
the major proposals and issues to be considered by the April Postal 
Operations Council meeting in Bern, Switzerland, and other subjects 
related to international postal and delivery services of interest to 
Advisory Committee members and the public.
    For further information, please contact Ms. Helen Grove of the 
Office of Global Systems (IO/GS), Bureau of International Organization 
Affairs, U.S. Department of State, at (202) 647-1044 or by email at 
GroveHA@state.gov.mailto:

    Dated: January 30, 2013.
Robert Downes,
Designated Federal Officer, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-02685 Filed 2-5-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-19-P
```
Order filed, May 06 , 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00840

- CR

____________ LORENZA ANDRE SAM , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 240th District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Tr ial Court Cause No. 10

- DCR

- 055360A

ORDER
The reporter’s record in this case was due September 30, 2013

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On December 12, 2013 , this court granted the court reporters request for extension of time to file the record until Janua ry 02, 2014 with no
further extensions

. On January 07, 2014 this court granted the court reporters second request for extension of time to file the record until February 06, 2014
with no further extensions

. To date, the record has not been filed with th e court.Because the reporter’s record was not filed within the time prescribed in the first

two extensions the court issues the following order.

We order Elizabeth Wittu , the official court reporter, to file the record in this appeal on or before May 05, 2014

. No further extension will be
entertained

. The trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(c). If Elizabeth
Wittu does not timely file the record as ordered, the Court may issue an order directing the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for the failure
to file the record.

PER CURIAM
(Reap. Dec. 10693)

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1312.

(Decided March 10, 1964)

*Sharretts, Batey & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*John*TV. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

LaweeNce, Judge:

The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain wire strand forms the subject of the above-enumerated appeal for a reappraisement.

*472The case has been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed as follows:

> That the merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above consists of wire strand exported from Japan on October 1, 1960; that the wire strand is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that on or immediately preceding the date of exportation of this shipment of wire strand covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above, the price at which wire strand, such as or similar to the wire strand described on the invoice covered by the instant appeal to reap-praisement was freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal market of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was $249. per metric ton for wire strand of % inch diameter (United States funds),.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165 (19 U.S.C. § 1401a (b)), is the proper basis of value for the wire strand in issue and that said value is $249 per metric ton for wire strand of %-inch diameter (United States funds).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities

Pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), as amended, notice is hereby given that a meeting of the Arts Advisory Panel to the National Council on the Arts will be held by teleconference from the Nancy Hanks Center, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20506 as follows (ending time is approximate): 

Folk & Traditional Arts (application review): March 5, 2007. This meeting, from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. eastern standard time, will be closed. 

The closed portions of meetings are for the purpose of Panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendations on financial assistance under the National Foundation on the Arts and the Humanities Act of 1965, as amended, including information given in confidence to the agency. In accordance with the determination of the Chairman of April 8, 2005, these sessions will be closed to the public pursuant to subsection (c)(6) of section 552b of Title 5, United States Code. 

Further information with reference to these meetings can be obtained from Ms. Kathy Plowitz-Worden, Office of Guidelines & Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts, Washington, DC 20506, or call 202/682-5691. 

Dated: February 20, 2007. 

Kathy Plowitz-Worden, 

Panel Coordinator, Panel Operations, National Endowment for the Arts. 

 [FR Doc. E7-3200 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7537-01-P
Page 1 of 3

Bulletin No. 2023-11

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to Bulletin No. 2023-08, U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury 

Financial Manual (TFM) Supplement

1. Purpose: This bulletin notifies agencies that Part 1 and Part 2 of the USSGL Supplement have been 

revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 and FY 2024. 

2. Summary of Changes: The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. 

3. Changes by Part/Section/File: 

Part 1 - FY 2023 Reporting changes to files in Sections III, IV, V, and VII:

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting 

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2023 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule
Page 2 of 3

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2023 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail

 Edits Closing

Part 2 - FY 2024 Reporting changes to files in Sections I, II, III, IV, V, and VII:

Section I: Chart of Accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting 

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2024 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2024 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail

 Edits Summary

 Edits Closing

4. Effective Date: 

Part 1 requirements for FY 2023 are effective immediately. 

Part 2 requirements for FY 2024 are effective October 1, 2023. 
Page 3 of 3

5. Inquiries: 

Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Chris Beck

Director, General Ledger and Intragovernmental Transaction Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Email: USSGLTeam@fiscal.treasury.gov

Date: September 14, 2023
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection VII&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/4/18
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 57-5 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 2

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 57 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 57-5 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1

                     Certification pursuant to Section 1350
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  DA Consulting Group, Inc. (the
"COMPANY")  on  Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof  (the "REPORT"), I,
Virginia  L. Pierpont, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

     1)   the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended; and

     2)   the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.




                                             /s/ Virginia L. Pierpont
                                        -------------------------------------
                                                 Virginia L. Pierpont
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
                                                Date:  May 20, 2003




A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  DA  Consulting  Group,  Inc. and will be retained by DA Consulting
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon  its  request.


                                       19
<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROGER EDWARD JEROME BIEROS, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner :

:

VS. :

:

SUPERINTENDENT KENNETH KYLER :

(SCI at Huntingdon), :

AND :

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF :

THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, :

AND :

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF :

THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, :

Respondents : NO. 02-4453

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2002, upon consideration of

petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after a

thorough investigation of the procedural history of the instant

habeas petition, it is apparent that the petitioner has failed to

exhaust his state remedies. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that

petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel filed with the Clerk

on October 21, 2002 (document #10), is DENIED, since there is no

automatic right to counsel in a federal habeas corpus proceeding.

Reese v. Fulcomer, 946 F.2d 247, 263 (3d Cir. 1991).

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________________

 CHARLES B. SMITH

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04453-JCJ Document 12 Filed 10/23/2002 Page 1 of 1
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SETONDJI VIRGILE NAHUM,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

LONNIE SPEAR; AMBER HODGE;

HOME DEPOT USA, INC.; GEORGE M.

DEREZES; JAMES P. SCOTT ; CITY OF

SEATTLE

,

Defendants

- Appellees,

and

SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendant. No. 21

- 35225

D.C. No. 2:20

- cv

- 01151

- DWC

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

David W. Christel, Magistrate Judge, Presiding **

Submitted June 15, 2022 * * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28

U.S.C. § 636(c).

* * * The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decis ion

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 35225

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Setondji Virgile Nahum appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging various federal and s tate law claims in connection

with the filing of a police report. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

Colony Cove Props, LLC v. City of Carson , 640 F.3d 948, 955 (9th Cir. 2011). We

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Nahum’s action because Nahum failed

to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal

,

556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) ( t o avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient

factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its

face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)) ; see also West v. Atkins , 487

U.S. 42, 48 (1988) (elements of a § 1983 claim); Evans v. McKay , 869 F.2d 1341,

1344 (9th Cir. 1989) (in a § 1981 action, “plaintiffs must show intentional

discrimination on account of race”) ; Castro v. County of Los Angeles , 833 F.3d

1060, 1073

- 76 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (discussing requirements for m unicipal

liability); Phoenix Trading, Inc. v. Loops LLC , 732 F.3d 936, 942 (9th Cir. 2013)

( explaining immunity for statements made to government entities under Wash.

Rev. Code § 4.24.510 ; providing that it does not include a good faith requirement ) ;

Reykd al v. Espinoza , 473 P.3d 1221, 1224 (Wash. 2020) (setting forth elements of3 21

- 35225

a defamation claim); Harper v. State , 429 P.3d 1071, 1076 ( Wash. 2018)

( discussing elements of a gross negligence claim )

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief

, or arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett

v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.