alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 55899.

protest 73164-K (New York).

#### Burroughs Wellcome & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole,-J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378), The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT, :

:

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 02-4421

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., et al., :

:

Defendants. :

:

NOTICE

Please be advised that the above-captioned matter is scheduled for oral argument on

defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 23) with the Honorable Petrese B. Tucker on

Wednesday, March 23, 2005 at 2:30p.m. Counsel shall report to Courtroom 9B, 601 Market

Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

FOR THE COURT:

 

Alisa Ross

Deputy Clerk to Judge Petrese B. Tucker

(267) 299-7619

cc: A. Alberts

S. Gold

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 31 Filed 02/02/2005 Page 1 of 1
Form of Demand Promissory Note issued to Michael Traina



 Exhibit 4.1 
 DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	AMOUNT:	  	US$109,449
		
	DATE:	  	June 6, 2008

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, CLEARPOINT BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC. promises to pay MICHAEL D.
TRAINA the principal amount of US$109,449 (One Hundred Nine Thousand Four Hundred Forty-Nine U.S. Dollars) on demand. No interest shall accrue on the unpaid principal balance of this Note until demand, with interest at the rate of 5% per
annum after demand. 
 ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. waives presentment, demand, notice of dishonour and protest or further notice of
any kind and agrees that he shall remain liable in respect of this Note as if presentment, demand, notice of dishonour and protest had been duly made or given. 
  

			
	FULL VALUE RECEIVED:
	 CLEARPOINT BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	  

	 Name:
	 	  

	 Title:
	 	  

	
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:
	
	  

	 Michael D. Traina
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HEALTHCARE ADVOCATES, INC. : CIVIL ACTION 

 :

 v. :

:

HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & : NO. 05-3524 

FRAILEY, et al.

O R D E R

Before the Honorable Robert F. Kelly

AND NOW, this 20th day of July, 2007, in accordance

with the Court’s Memorandum & Order on this date,

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be and the same is hereby

entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff.

BY THE COURT

 ATTEST: s/Thomas Garrity

 Thomas Garrity 

 Deputy Clerk

Civ 1 (8/80)

Case 2:05-cv-03524-RK Document 79 Filed 07/20/07 Page 1 of 1
#### Lewis *vs.*Lewis.

When a' wife has obtained final decree for alimony and the husband fails to comply therewith, and it is sufficiently shown to the court that this failure does not arise from lack of ability on part of the husband to comply, it is not error for the court to compel compliance, by an order of attachment directing his imprisonment in the event of his continued disregard of the decree.

(a) The enforcement of such final decree by attachment for contempt is not equivalent to imprisonment for debt.

.July 11, 1888.

Alimony. Attachment. Practice in superior court. - Constitutional law. Before Judge Kibbee. Pulaski supe■rior court. November term, 1887.

’Reported in the decision.

.J. EL Martin, for plaintiff in error.

W. L. Grice, by brief, *contra.*

Blandford, Justice.

This was an attachment for contempt, granted upon the: motion of the wife, against the husband (the plaintiff in error), because of his failure to comply with a final decree in her favor for alimony. The plaintiff in error contends that the court below had no power to attach him for con-, tempt upon this ground; that this was a decree for money, : and was a final disposition of the case, and that its enforcement by attachment for contempt would be equivalent to 'imprisonment for debt, and therefore contrary to the constitution and laws of this State. .

We are of the opinion that when a court directs the payment of alimony by a husband to his wife, it is a duty he owes, not only to his wife but to the public, to comply with the order; and if he fails to perform that duty, we see no reason why the court cannot compel him to do so by an order of attachment, directing his imprisonment in *707the event of his failure to comply with the order. Of course this is a power which should be carefully and cautiously exercised, and before granting the writ the court ought to be satisfied that there is good ground for the attachment; and such appears to have been the case here. This is a case in which the old adage applies, that “when a bird can singand will not sing, he must be made to sing.” When it appeared to the court that this defendant had the money to comply with the decree, and that he failed to comply with it, we think the court had the right and the power to imprison him until he did comply with it.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2018094EN.01002001.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2018 — Brunner v EUIPO

(Case T-367/16) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark H HOLY HAFERL HAFERL SHOE COUTURE - Earlier EU trade mark HOLY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 094/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gerd Brunner (Moosthenning, Germany) (represented by: N. Maenz and D. Oerter, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2016 (Case R 2943/2014-5) concerning opposition proceedings between CBM and Mr Brunner.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Gerd Brunner to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Gerd Brunner to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.

1

---
# Main

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENTUSSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Statement of Changes in Net Position		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2016 ReportingSection VI

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2016-XX	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT VI RSCNP - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Meeting December 3, 2015

# Footnotes and Additional Inform

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2016 ReportingSection VI

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2016-XX	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT VI RSCNP - 12	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Meeting December 3, 2015
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 8468 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 208

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Revise Maintence

Program 1 .0 $ 85.00 $ 85.00 

### 23 $ 2,210.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 2,210



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious . This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regu latory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it a ppropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
AXEDA SYSTEMS INC.

Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer required pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
furnished herewith pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of Axeda Systems Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the  quarterly  period  ended  March 31,  2005,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange   Commission  on  May  16,  2005  (the  Report),   the
undersigned,  Robert M. Russell Jr.,  Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive
Officer of the Company and Karen F. Kupferberg,  Executive Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:     /s/ Robert M. Russell Jr.
        ----------------------------
        Robert M. Russell Jr.
        Chairman of the Board and
        Chief Executive Officer
        May 16, 2005

By:     /s/ Karen F. Kupferberg
        ----------------------------
        Karen F. Kupferberg
        Executive Vice President,
        Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
        May 16, 2005


This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Axeda Systems Inc. and will be retained by Axeda Systems Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      498,527
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        555
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          65,349
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        69,885
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 634,316
<COMMON>                                        33,475
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      103,145
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             61,150
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 197,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,036
<PREFERRED>                                     10,819
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           188,880
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  39,300
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                        105
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    15
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 173,391
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  634,316
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      318,542
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            20,635
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     251,766
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     272,401
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         46,141
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                             (1,690)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  44,451
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        16,795
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,656
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,458
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   25,198
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        19,941
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,526
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                               0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.63
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $2.63
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Park City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries**

**Certification Pursuant To**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To**

**Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**

 

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A No. 2 for the year ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall K. Fields, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: | January 5, 2007 |
|--------|-----------------|

 

| /s/ Randall K. Fields            |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|
| Randall K. Fields                |   |
| Principal Executive Officer, CEO |   |

 

 

**(REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)**
## **Exhibit 21**

**LIST OFSUBSIDIARIESOFFURNITURE BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.**
| **Name of  Subsidiary**                   | ** ** | **Jurisdiction of  Incorporation** |
|-------------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------|
|                                      |       |                               |
| Action Transport, Inc.                    |       | Delaware                           |
| Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc.       |       | North Carolina                     |
| Broyhill Home Furnishings, Inc.           |       | Delaware                           |
| Broyhill Retail, Inc.                     |       | Delaware                           |
| Broyhill Transport, Inc.                  |       | North Carolina                     |
| Decorative Hardware Solutions (L) Bhd.    |       | Malaysia                           |
| Fayette Enterprises, Inc.                 |       | Mississippi                        |
| HDM Furniture Industries, Inc.            |       | Delaware                           |
| HDM Transport, Inc.                       |       | North Carolina                     |
| HDM Retail, Inc.                          |       | Delaware                           |
| Henredon Designer Showrooms, Inc.         |       | Delaware                           |
| Hickory Business Furniture, Inc.          |       | North Carolina                     |
| Lane Furniture Industries, Inc.           |       | Mississippi                        |
| Lane Home Furnishings Retail, Inc.        |       | Delaware                           |
| Laneventure, Inc.                         |       | Delaware                           |
| Maitland-Smith Asia Holdings Limited      |       | Vanuatu                            |
| Maitland-Smith Cebu, Inc.                 |       | Philippines                        |
| Maitland-Smith Furniture Industries, Inc. |       | Delaware                           |
| Maitland-Smith Limited                    |       | Hong Kong                          |
| P.T. Maitland-Smith Indonesia             |       | Indonesia                          |
| Maitland-Smith Export (L) Bhd.            |       | Malaysia                           |
| The Lane Company, Incorporated            |       | Virginia                           |
| Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.    |       | Delaware                           |
| Thomasville Home Furnishings, Inc.        |       | Delaware                           |
| Thomasville Retail, Inc.                  |       | Virginia                           |

 

Lane FurnitureIndustries, Inc. also does business as Laneventure.

ThomasvilleFurniture Industries, Inc. also does business as HBF, Founders, CreativeInteriors and Vignettes.  HDM FurnitureIndustries, Inc. also does business as Hickory Chair Company and The PearsonCompany.

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEFFREY LILY :

:

: CIVIL ACTION 

v. :

: NO. 02-CV-2784

:

ALDI, INC. :

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2003, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Clerk of Court shall mark the above-captioned matter closed for statistical

purposes and shall place it in the civil suspense file. 

2. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the matter for 120 days from the date of

this Order. 

3. Counsel shall notify the Court when the binding ADR has been completed. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

___________________

R. Barclay Surrick, Judge 

Case 2:02-cv-02784-RBS Document 13 Filed 07/01/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: AMERICAN INVESTORS :

LIFE INSURANCE CO. ANNUITY : MDL DOCKET NO. 1712

MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES :

LITIGATION :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2011, upon

consideration of the defendants’ Motion to Enforce Final Order

and Judgment (Docket No. 524), the opposition of Orlis M.

Charboneau as executor of the estate of class member Paul

Charboneau, the defendants’ reply thereto, an on-the-record oral

argument held via teleconference on July 28, 2011, and for the

reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s date, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants’ motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

Case 2:05-md-01712-MAM Document 539 Filed 09/16/11 Page 1 of 1
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 79 (Friday, April 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 22977]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09595]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List; Proposed Additions and Deletion

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Proposed Additions to and Deletion from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add products to the Procurement 
List that will be furnished by a nonprofit agency employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities, and deletes a service 
previously furnished by such agency.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before: May 25, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 1401 S. Clark Street, Suite 715, Arlington, Virginia 22202-
4149.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry S. Lineback, Telephone: (703) 
603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503 (a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Additions

    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
procure the products listed below from the nonprofit agency employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following products are proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for production by the nonprofit agency listed:

Products

Product Name/NSN(s): File Folder, Single Tab, 1/3 Cut
    7530-00-NIB-1105--Letter, Position 2
    7530-00-NIB-1106--Letter, Position 3
Distribution: A-List
    7530-00-NIB-1107--Legal, Position 1
    7530-00-NIB-1108--Legal, Position 2
    7530-00-NIB-1109--Legal, Position 3
Distribution: B-List
Mandatory Purchase By: Total and Broad Government Requirements
Mandatory Source of Supply: Association for Vision Rehabilitation 
and Employment, Inc., Binghamton, NY
Contracting Activity: General Services Administration, New York, NY

Deletion

    The following service is proposed for deletion from the Procurement 
List:

Service

Service Type: Shelf Stocking, Custodial & Warehousing Service
Service is Mandatory for: Travis Air Force Base, Travis AFB, CA
Mandatory Source of Supply: PRIDE Industries, Roseville, CA
Contracting Activity: Defense Commissary Agency, Fort Lee, VA

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015-09595 Filed 4-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```