alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.3





 Exhibit 10.3 

APA Corporation 

Executive Termination Policy 
 This Policy,
which provides for the payment of certain benefits upon termination of employment, applies to: 
 All executive officers in the event of a
termination of employment without cause. 
 Pursuant to the Policy, in the event of a termination of employment without cause, executive officers are
eligible to receive the following benefits; 
  

	 	•	 	 base salary benefit: 


  

	 	•	 	 two times base salary for the chief executive officer; 



 

	 	•	 	 1.75 times base salary for executive vice presidents; 



 

	 	•	 	 1.5 times base salary for senior vice presidents and regional vice presidents; 



 

	 	•	 	 one times base salary for vice presidents; 



 

	 	•	 	 prorated target bonus; 



 

	 	•	 	 twelve months COBRA subsidy at active rates; 



 

	 	•	 	 three years’ service credit toward retiree medical; 



 

	 	•	 	 prorated vesting for restricted stock units and stock options and extension of exercise period to full life of
original stock option award; and 


  

	 	•	 	 prorated vesting based on time in performance period for performance shares provided the executive has
participated in the performance program for at least one year of the performance period (calculated at the end of the performance period and, if a payout is warranted, paid in cash according to the performance program’s vesting schedule).



 A condition precedent to an executive officer receiving the benefits under this Executive Termination Policy will be for such executive
to provide a full and final release to the Company of all claims in a form of release approved by the Company’s general counsel or chief executive officer. 

Upon termination of employment after a Change of Control, all executive officers will receive no additional benefits pursuant to this Policy during the 24
months following a Change of Control when they are entitled to termination benefits under the Income Continuance Plan. Benefits for such officers after termination of employment upon a Change of Control will continue to be administered under the
Company’s Income Continuance Plan and existing equity grant agreements with the Company. After expiration of the period that termination benefits are provided by the Income Continuance Plan, this Policy shall again be operative.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
      a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the
Companys fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Stephen J. TulipanoName:
    Stephen J. TulipanoTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
----

Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 May 2006 — R v Commission

(Case T-331/04) (1)

(Officials - Appointment - Classification in grade - Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)

(2006/C 165/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: R (Chaumont-Gistoux, Belgium) (represented by: B. Arians, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and H. Kraemer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for the annulment of the decision relating to the applicant's classification in grade

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

----
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

82 Limited Use of USSGL 439701

The use of USSGL 439701 is limited to specific Treasury TAS. Fail

USSGL 

ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

=439701

82E Limited Use of USSGL 439701

The use of USSGL 439701 is limited to specific Treasury TAS.

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass 011 X8242000

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Bulletin No. 2016-XX DRAFT VII VDR - 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ANCHOR GLASS CONTAINER CORPORATION INCLUDED IN FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,893
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   71,238
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,152
<INVENTORY>                                    122,785
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               202,299
<PP&E>                                         382,015
<DEPRECIATION>                                  55,906
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 635,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,806
<BONDS>                                        202,826
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           55,983
<PREFERRED>                                         34
<COMMON>                                           139
<OTHER-SE>                                      64,078
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   635,669
<SALES>                                        149,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               149,187
<CGS>                                          143,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  143,393
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (7,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (7,756)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (7,756)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (3.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (3.12)
        

</TABLE>
----

----

I Tájékoztatások

Bizottság

----

MEZŐGAZDASÁGI NÖVÉNYFAJOK KÖZÖS FAJTAJEGYZÉKE

Negyedik kiegészítés a 24. teljes kiadáshoz

(2006/C 167 A/01)

TARTALOM

Magyarázat

Szántóföldi fajok jegyzéke

I.   Répafélék

II.   Takarmánynövények

III.   Olaj- és rostnövények

IV.   Gabonafélék

V.   Burgonyafélék

----

MAGYARÁZAT

----

(1)HL C 68. A, 2006.3.21., 1. o. A legutóbb a harmadik kiegészítéssel (HL C 146. A, 2006.6.22., 1. o.) módosított fajtajegyzék.

(2)HL L 193., 2002.7.20., 1. o. A legutóbb az 1829/2003/EK európai parlamenti és tanácsi rendelettel (HL L 268., 2003.10.18., 1. o.) módosított irányelv.

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

5.AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA L.

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

27.POA TRIVIALIS L.

31.LUPINUS ALBUS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

33.LUPINUS LUTEUS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

37.ONOBRYCHIS VICIIFOLIA SCOP.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

39.TRIFOLIUM ALEXANDRINUM L.

40.TRIFOLIUM HYBRIDUM L.

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

44.TRIFOLIUM RESUPINATUM L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

53.RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. VAR. OLEIFORMIS PERS.

III

56.BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERNJ ET COSSON

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

59.CANNABIS SATIVA L.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

65.PAPAVER SOMNIFERUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
----

----

I Comunicazioni

Commissione

----

Tassi di cambio dell'euro (1)

4 settembre 2006

(2006/C 213/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Fonte: tassi di cambio di riferimento pubblicati dalla Banca centrale europea.

----

----

Comunicazione della Commissione ai sensi della procedura prevista dall'articolo 4, paragrafo 1, lettera a), del regolamento (CEE) n. 2408/92 del Consiglio

Imposizione di oneri di servizio pubblico sui servizi aerei regolari all'interno dell'Italia

(2006/C 213/02)

(Testo rilevante ai fini del SEE)

A norma delle disposizioni dell'articolo 4, paragrafo 1, lettera a), del regolamento (CEE) n. 2408/92 del Consiglio, del 23 luglio 1992, sull'accesso dei vettori aerei della Comunità alle rotte intracomunitarie, il governo italiano, in conformità alle decisioni assunte in sede di conferenza dei servizi tenutasi presso la Regione Piemonte, ha deciso di imporre oneri di servizio pubblico riguardo ai servizi aerei di linea sulla rotta seguente:

1.   Rotta interessata

Cuneo — Roma e v.v.

2.   Articolazione degli oneri di servizio pubblico

2.1.   In termini di numero di frequenze minime:

la frequenza minima sulla rotta sopra individuata è la seguente:

L'intera capacità di ciascun aeromobile dovrà essere messa in vendita secondo il regime degli oneri senza alcun contingentamento.

2.2.   In termini di orari:

Sulla rotta Cuneo — Roma gli orari dovranno prevedere:

sulla rotta Roma — Cuneo gli orari dovranno prevedere:

2.3.   In termini di aeromobili utilizzabili o di capacità offerta:

I servizi dovranno essere effettuati con aeromobili biturboelica o bireattori pressurizzati aventi una capacità minima di 40 posti per tutto l'anno.

Nel caso in cui il mercato lo richieda, dovrà essere offerta maggiore capacità tramite l'istituzione di voli supplementari i quali non daranno luogo a compensazioni aggiuntive.

Il vettore che accetta gli oneri, fatte salve le motivazioni di sicurezza che potranno determinare il rifiuto dell'imbarco, si adopererà, con ogni consentito sforzo, al fine di agevolare, sugli aeromobili utilizzati, il trasporto di passeggeri diversamente abili ed a ridotta mobilità.

2.4.   In termini di tariffe:

2.5.   In termini di continuità dei servizi:

Al fine di garantire la continuità, regolarità e puntualità dei voli, il vettore che accetta i presenti oneri di servizio pubblico si impegna a:

2.6.   Presentazione dell'accettazione:

I vettori che intendono accettare gli oneri di servizio pubblico contenuti nel presente documento, devono presentare, entro il termine perentorio di trenta giorni dalla data di pubblicazione nella Gazzetta ufficiale dell'Unione europea della comunicazione della Commissione relativa all'imposizione dei citati oneri, formale accettazione da indirizzare all'Ente Nazionale dell'Aviazione Civile.

----

----

Notifica preventiva di una concentrazione

(Caso n. COMP/M.4271 — Daikin/OYL)

(2006/C 213/03)

(Testo rilevante ai fini del SEE)

----

(1)GU L 24 del 29.1.2004, pag. 1.

----

----

Notifica preventiva di una concentrazione

(Caso n. COMP/M.4316 — Atos Origin/Banksys/BCC)

(2006/C 213/04)

(Testo rilevante ai fini del SEE)

----

(1)GU L 24 del 29.1.2004, pag. 1.

----
General Fund 

TAS/BETC Project 

05/05/2021

1

FY20 Audit Finding Overview

Fiscal Service proposed remediation steps

Data gathering and analysis

Present Methodology to GAO (Mid to late Summer)

Agency Confirmations of TAS/BETC relationships

Establish “Standard” BETC documentation

Establish “Nonstandard” BETC documentation 

Formalize review process for both “Standard” and “Nonstandard” 

Agenda

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

Supporting account attributes of active Treasury Account Symbols (TAS)

Fiscal Service was unable to readily provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support the account attributes assigned to active TASs (including BETCs)

FY20 Audit Finding Overview

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

High Level Steps for TAS/BETC population

Gather all open and active TAS/BETC permutations

Check these permutations to confirm usage

Confirm inactivity with Federal Entities

“Inactivate” unneeded permutations

Goal is to reduce total population down to a much more manageable number for documentation purposes.

Fiscal Service Remediation Steps

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

Fiscal Service will send out a Data Call asking entities to confirm which TAS/BETC relationships are needed and which are not.

Any conflicts between Federal Entities’ analysis and Fiscal Service’s analysis will be handled on case-by-case basis.

Data for Data Call and points of contact are still being compiled.

Plan is to send out by end of May 2021.

Agency Confirmations

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

Once we have a manageable population of TAS/BETC to work with we will divide the remaining population into two buckets:

Standard BETC’s

Nonstandard BETC’s

Much of the remaining population (>90%) will be covered under the standard BETC documentation

One-off documentation will be used to cover the various scenarios that comprise the Nonstandard BETC’s

Standard/Nonstandard BETC Documentation

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

As a final step, Fiscal Service will then formalize a regular and routine review process to ensure both Standard and Nonstandard BETC’s are appropriately assigned to accounts year over year.

Details on this are not available but will be communicated to agencies as they become available.

Formalize review process for both Standard and Nonstandard BETC’s

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

QUESTIONS?

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

Luke Sheppard

GFAB Manager

Luke.Sheppard@Fiscal.Treasury.gov

Joel Erb

GFAB Supervisor

Joel.Erb@fiscal.treasury.gov

Jordan Benson

GFAB Accountant

Jordan.Benson@fiscal.treasury.gov

Contact Information

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

# image1.png

# image3.png
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 111

- CR & 06

- 17

- 113

- CR

MICHAEL PATRICK HEALY, SR., Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 188th District Court Gregg County, Texas Trial Court No. 45,932

- A & 45,930

- A

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Our review of the reporter’s record in this case indicates that it contains “sensitive data” as that phrase is defined in Rule 9.10 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(a). Sensitive data includes “a birth date, a home addr ess, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(a)(3). Volume 6 of the reporter’s record contains the name of a person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed. Rule 9.10(b) sta tes, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(b). Rule 9.10(g) provides, “A court may also order that a document be filed under seal in paper form or electronic form, without redaction.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(g). Therefore, because the volume 6 of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we order t he clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(g), to seal the electronically filed volume 6 of the reporter’s record in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: January 17, 2018
EXHIBIT 24
                                
                        POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                
     The undersigned  hereby constitute and appoint IRVING WEISER
and DANIEL  J. REUSS  and  each  of  them  his  true  and  lawful
attorneys-in-fact and  agents, with  full powers  of substitution
and resubstitution,  for him and in his name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Inter-Regional Financial  Group, Inc.  for the fiscal year ending
December 31,  1994 and  all amendments  to such  Annual Report on
Form 10-K,  and to  file the  same with all exhibits thereto, and
other documents  in connection therewith, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission,  granting unto  said  attorneys-in-fact  and
agents, each  acting alone,  full power  and authority  to do and
perform to  all intents  and purposes  as he might or could do in
person, hereby  ratifying all  that  said  attorneys-in-fact  and
agents, each acting alone, or his substitutes, may lawfully do or
cause to be done by virtue thereof.

     SIGNATURE                                   DATE
     ---------                                   ----

John C. Appel                              February 7, 1996
-----------------------
John C. Appel

Susan S. Boren                             February 14, 1996
-----------------------
Susan S. Boren

Angela M. Chicoine                         February 7, 1996
-----------------------
Angela M. Chicoine

F. Gregory Fitz-Gerald                     February 7, 1996
-----------------------
F. Gregory Fitz-Gerald

Louis C. Fornetti                          February 7, 1996
-----------------------
Louis C. Fornetti

Lawrence Perlman                           February 7, 1996
-----------------------
Lawrence Perlman

C. A. Rundell, Jr.                         February 7, 1996
-----------------------
C.A. Rundell, Jr.

Robert L. Ryan                             February 7, 1996
-----------------------
Robert L. Ryan

Arthur R. Schulze, Jr.                     February 7, 1996
-----------------------
Arthur R. Schulze, Jr.

Irving Weiser                              February 7, 1996
-----------------------
Irving Weiser
AAM-12-305-E 

May 21, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10534 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0362 

Mr. Robert S. Walker 

Chief Pilot/Drug Manager 

CAL-ORE Life Flight, LCC dba DK Air, LCC 

202 Dale Rupert Road 

Cresent City, CA 95331 

Dear Mr. Walker: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated April 25, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of CAL-ORE Life Flight, LCC dba DK Air, LCC (DK Air), for an exemption from 

part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, 

would allow DK Air, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to DK Air. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant CAL-ORE Life Flight, LCC dba DK Air, LCC 

an exemption from 14 CFR part 120 to the extent necessary to allow DK Air which is 

operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees 

under one testing program, subject to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of DK Air are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at all times while 

conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

DK Air part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on May 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

James R. Fraser, M.D. 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Dwayne Powell, is the President and Chief Executive Officer
of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).



This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report).



By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement
is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                |  |                  
|--------------- |  | -----------------
|August 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Dwayne Powell
|Dated           |  | Dwayne Powell