alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o . 1 0

- 1 0 0 4 3

M A T T H E W R O L L I N S ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v . D A L L A S C O U N T Y T E X A S ; D A L L A S C O U N T Y C O N S T A B L E O F F I C E P R E C I N C T 2 ; M I C H A E L G O T H A R D ,

D e f e n d a n t s - A p p e l l a n t s

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o . 3 : 0 8

- C V

- 1 2 3 5

B e f o r e K I N G , D A V I S , a n d S O U T H W I C K , C i r c u i t J u d g e s . P E R C U R I A M : * A F F I R M E D

. S e e 5 C i r . R

. 4 7

. 6

. t h U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D March 3, 20 11 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C I R . R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion s hould not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R . R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10043 Document: 00511400508 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2011
Exhibit
        10.25

      

        Summary
          of Loan Agreement

      

       

      Loan
        from Hanting Kaiyuan Rural Credit Cooperative

       

      On
        July
        1, 2007, Weifong entered into a loan agreement with Hanting Kaiyuan Rural
        Credit
        Cooperative. Pursuant to the loan agreement, Hanting Kaiyuan Rural Credit
        Cooperative loaned Weifong $874,555, at interest rate of 11.088% per annum.
        Weifang is obligated under the loan agreement to pay interest monthly and
        repay
        the loan on the maturity date, January 1, 2009. Weifang plans to use the
        loan to
        finance the purchase of raw materials. The loan is secured by the plant and
        equipment of Weifang with a net book of $1,407,683 at December 31, 2007 and
        $1,399,552 as of March 31, 2008.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4021 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4021

   To place restrictions on the official display of flags, seals, or 
               emblems other than the United States flag.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 21, 2024

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To place restrictions on the official display of flags, seals, or 
               emblems other than the United States flag.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISPLAY OF FLAGS, SEALS, AND EMBLEMS OTHER THAN THE UNITED 
              STATES FLAG.

    Any flag, seal, or emblem that is not the United States flag and is 
flown, draped, projected, or displayed otherwise as a visual and 
symbolic representation at a United States diplomatic mission, official 
residence, or official office, or on an official United States 
vehicle--
            (1) shall be smaller than the official United States flag; 
        and
            (2) if flown, may not be displayed higher than or above the 
        United States flag.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

May 13, 1959

No. 63039.

#### Dunnington & Arnold, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 327635-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise involved consists of a Mercedes Benz automobile imported as unaccompanied baggage for the account of a nonresident of the United States; that the collector assessed duty on said automobile for the reason that the record showing the arrival of the nonresident in the United States had not been located; that such record has now been established; and that the automobile is properly entitled to free entry, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### -79 -78 -77 -76

39 40



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/23 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL
Before the First Division,

April 10, 1958

No. 61798.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 309199-K and 309201-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
SPA
 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 139: Hazardous Waste Management System;
 

Testing and Monitoring Activities I (cont'd)
 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 139
 

Testing and Monitoring"Activities Amendment I
 

60 FR 3089-3095
 

January 13, 1995
 

(RCRA Cluster V, Non-HSWA provisions)
 

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION 

WAC 173-303· 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

EQUIV· LESS MORE BROADER 

ALENT STRIN· STRIN· IN SCOPE 

GENT GENT 

PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
 

SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
 

REFERENCES
 

•
 

revise reference to 260.11(a) 110(3)(a) X 

"Test Methods for 

Evaluating Solid 

Waste, 

Physical/Chemical 

Methods" by 

replacing "Updates I 

and IIA" in the first 

sentence with 

"Updates I (July, 

1992), II 

(September, 1994), 

and IIA 

(August,1993)"; in 

the second 

sentence, replace 

"Update I" with 

"Updates I, II, and 

IIA"; replace the last 

portion of the 

second sentence 

beginning with "; 

and Update IIA is 

available from ..." 

with the new 

sentence, "Copies 

may be inspected at 

CL139.16 - Revised: 11/8/96 

Printed: 10/21198 January 13, 1995 - Page 1 of 1 
SP~

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 139: Hazardous Waste Management System; 

Testing and Monitoring Activities I (cont'd) 

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS: 

WAC 173-303· EQUIV- LESS MORE BROADER 

ALENT STRIN- STRIN- IN SCOPE 

GENT GENT 

the Library, U.S. 

Environmental 

Protection Agency, 

401 M Street, SW,. 

Washington, DC 

20460." 

o
 

CL139.16 - Revised: 11/8/96 

Printed: 10/21/98 January 13, 1995 - Page 2 of 1
No. 67832.

#### George A. Abood Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/20284 (New York).

*333Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sodium phosphate (brifisol 410) similiar in all material respects to that the subject of *George A. Abood Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 2270), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51646.

#### Protests 106833-K, etc., of Hirkos Trading Co. et. al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 63620.

protests 276641-K, etc. (New York).

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al. (42*C.C.P.A. 136, C.A.D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
----

----

I Meddelelser

Kommissionen

----

Euroens vekselkurs (1)

22. august 2006

(2006/C 198/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Kilde: Referencekurs offentliggjort af Den Europæiske Centralbank.

----

----

Medlemsstaternes oplysninger om statsstøtte ydet i henhold til Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 70/2001 af 12. januar 2001 om anvendelse af EF-traktatens artikel 87 og 88 på statsstøtte til små og mellemstore virksomheder

(2006/C 198/02)

(EØS-relevant tekst)

----

----

Medlemsstaternes oplysninger om statsstøtte ydet i henhold til Kommissionens forordning (EF) nr. 70/2001 af 12. januar 2001 om anvendelse af EF-traktatens artikel 87 og 88 på statsstøtte til små og mellemstore virksomheder

(2006/C 198/03)

(EØS-relevant tekst)

----

----

Anmeldelse af en planlagt fusion

(Sag COMP/M.4215 — Glatfelter/Crompton Assets)

(2006/C 198/04)

(EØS-relevant tekst)

----

(1)EUT L 24 af 29.1.2004, s. 1.

----

III Oplysninger

Kommissionen

----

Ændring af bekendtgørelsen om licitation over restitutionen ved eksport af byg til visse tredjelande

(»Den Europæiske Unions Tidende« C 148 af 24. juni 2006)

(2006/C 198/05)

På side 43 affattes nr. 1 i punkt III »Bud« således:

----

----

Ændring af bekendtgørelsen om licitation over restitutionen ved eksport af blød hvede til visse tredjelande

(»Den Europæiske Unions Tidende« C 148 af 24. juni 2006)

(2006/C 198/06)

På side 46 affattes nr. 1 i punkt III »Bud« således:

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2923]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (07-009)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

DATES: February 21, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert M. Padilla, Patent Counsel, 
Ames Research Center, Code 202A-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000; 
telephone (650) 604-5104; fax (650) 604-2767.
    NASA Case No. ARC-15566-3: Real Time Oil Reservoir Evaluation Using 
Nanotechnology;
    NASA Case No. ARC-15578-2: Visual Image Sensor Organ Replacement 
Implementation;
    NASA Case No. ARC-15201-1: Toughened Uni-piece Fibrous Reinforced 
Oxidation-Resistant Composite (TUFROC);
    NASA Case No. ARC-15890-1: Contaminated Water Treatment.

    Dated: February 9, 2007.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management.
 [FR Doc. E7-2923 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
# Main

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENTUSSGL Crosswalk- Statement of Changes in Net Position		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection V&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT V SCNP - &P	I&"Arial,Bold"RC Handout March 1, 2018

# Footnotes and Additional Inform

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENTUSSGL Crosswalk- Statement of Changes in Net Position		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection V&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT V SCNP - &[8	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout March 1, 2018
No. 52920.

#### Model City Canning Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 142414-K (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of offal, beef lips, cow udders, and the like, which were in an adulterated condition at the time of importation; that this offal, or waste, was not handled in a sanitary manner and was unfit for human consumption; and that it was actually used for dog food. On the record presented the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

March 26, 1947

No. 51637.

#### Protests 871484-G, etc., of Q. W. Lung Co. et al. (Boston).

*178Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kuruquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

June 10, 1968

No. P68/261.

protests 66/8572, etc. (New York).

#### Goodman & Weinberg et al. *v.*United States,

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of water repellent twill backed velveteens similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Amity*Fabrics, *Inc.*v. *United States*(51 Cust. Ct. 97, C.D. 2416), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 7 Filed 11/05/2002 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 7 Filed 11/05/2002 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 7 Filed 11/05/2002 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 7 Filed 11/05/2002 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 7 Filed 11/05/2002 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 7 Filed 11/05/2002 Page 6 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 :

DOLORES BARRETT : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4421

Plaintiff, :

:

vs. :

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., ET AL. :

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of September 2003, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion

for Certification Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) (Doc. 6) and Plaintiff’s Response thereto (Doc.

7), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is DENIED. This Court finds that the

controlling question of law in this case, for purposes of certification under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), is

whether there is a requirement of state action under Article I § 28 of the Pennsylvania Constitution

(the “PERA”) before an individual can file a claim. In this Court’s Memorandum and Order dated

August 19, 2003, this Court found that, in light of Hartford, Pfeiffer, and Welsch, there is a purely

private right of action under the PERA absent any type of state action. Id. at 7. The Pennsylvania

Supreme Court in Hartford and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Pfeiffer have decided this

issue, and there is no substantial ground for difference of opinion. Furthermore, immediate appeal

from the Court’s August 19, 2003 Order will not materially advance the ultimate termination of this

litigation, but rather cause further delay.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 9 Filed 09/25/2003 Page 1 of 1
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, May 31, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, May 31, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19A2070. THE STATE v. EDDIE WILL TOOLEY, et al..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
No. 64087.

protest 59/27627 (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

*430Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of parts of pbotomicrograpbie cameras, tbe claim of tbe plaintiff was sustained.
J IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DARRYL MURRAY : CIVIL ACTION
NX

Vv

DAVID S. FERRIERO : i

Archivist of the United States, National : FILED

Archives and Records Administration : NO. 05-4557 FEB U5 201%
ICHAEL E, KUNZ, Clem

ORDER act aaa

‘

AND NOW, this 15" day of February, 2013, it is ORDERED that the within

document is filed under seal and impounded until further Order of the court.

(QC 60 spe
{ leg .
2, Ba 42!

ENTERED
Lae FEB 15 2013
. CLERK OF COURT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

JAMES WIIlTTED 

J. Baylson 

CRIMINAL ACTION 

NO. 05-59802 

CIVIL ACTION 

NO. 15-1503 

MEMORANDUM 

October 23, 2015 

Defendant J arnes Whitted has filed a motion for reconsideration of this Court's Order dated 

April 2, 2015 dismissing a motion pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as an unauthorized second or 

successive petition (ECF 763). The government has filed a response, and defendant has filed a 

reply (ECF 779). 

Defendant's motion for reconsideration appears to be based on a misleading and erroneous 

reading of a prior decision of the Third Circuit in United States v. Miller, 197 F .3d, 644 (3d Cir. 

1997). Defendant argues that he did not receive the warning to which he believes he was entitled 

to under Miller, that he has to be notified that he must raise in a first Section 2255 motion, all 

grounds that exist for relief, because a second or successive petition is not allowed. The lower 

courts in other circuits have dealt with this issue, but it needs not to be explored in this case 

because the facts show that defendant did receive the requisite notice that he must raise all grounds 

in his first 2255 petition, which was filed on May 24, 2012. 

The government's reply has an accurate procedural history of this case. 

Although the ECF docket in this case for this petition (ECF 675) does not contain the two 

page warnings that give the advice arguably required by Miller based on government form 

Case 2:05-cr-00598-MMB Document 780 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 2
PAE-A0243 (Rev. 10/09), the undersigned has ascertained from the Clerk's Office that this two 

page document is always attached to the petition that federal prisoners must use to have a 2255 

petition docketed. This form is available in federal prisons (or on line) and incudes the two page 

instructions arguably required by Miller. The fact that when the petition is filed by the petitioner 

the two page instructions are not included on the docket does not prove that petitioner did not 

receive the instructions. 

Although the government's brief asserts that the requisite warning required by Miller is no 

longer required because of intervening Supreme Court cases, the Court need not reach this issue. 

An appropriate Order follows. 

O:\CRlMINAL CASES\05-598 HARRIS, US V\WHITfED 05.598.2.093015.2255.DOCX 

Case 2:05-cr-00598-MMB Document 780 Filed 10/23/15 Page 2 of 2
----

Action brought on 17 August 2006 — PTV v OHIM (map&guide travelbook)

(Case T-219/06)

(2006/C 237/23)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: PTV Planung Transport Verkehr AG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by F. Nielsen, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Forms of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘map&guide travelbook’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16 and 42.

Decision of the Examiner: Partial dismissal of the application.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.

Pleas in law: The mark applied for does have distinctive character for the purposes of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1).

----

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

WILLIE JAMES MCCANTS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1846

[January 7, 2021]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Rosemarie Scher, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 502016CF012797AXXXWB.

Willie James McCants, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alister Cowan, Vice
President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:March 8, 2011



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/ Alister Cowan                       
|Alister Cowan                           
|Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
Harcros Chemicals Inc. 

5200 Speaker Road 

Kansas City, KS 66106 

Telephone: 913/621-7747 

Fax: 913/621-7746 

E-mail: OrganicsCS@Harcros.com 

Date 10/11/12 

Paul Campanella 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7 407M) 

Office of Pollution Control and Toxics (OPPT) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

EPA East Building, Room E6428 (202-564-8930) 

1201 Constitution Ave., NW 

Washington, D.C. 20460 (202-564-8930) 

Attn: TSCA Section 4 

40 CFR § 799.5087 (Docket# EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531) 

Telephone number: 202-564-8091 

RE: Request for Extension of Testing for 0-Giuco-Heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2 xi)-

Dear Paul: 

Harcros Chemicals Inc. submitted a letter of intent for D-gluco-Heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi.)-

[CAS# 31138-65-5] on April 5, 2011. We are requesting an extension until May 31, 2013 to complete the 

testing requirements in accordance with EPA's final rule, Testing of Certain High Production Volume 

Chemicals; Second Group of Chemicals, published in the Federal Register on January 7, 2011 at 76 

Fed. Reg. 1067. 

D-gluco-Heptonic acid, monosodium salt, (2.xi.)- [CAS# 31138-65-5] contains water as a result of the 

manufacturing process. It was necessary for Harlan Laboratories, our testing facility, to determine the 

amount of water contained in the sample Harcros provided for testing purposes. Harlan Laboratories 

experienced difficulty removing the water as they were unable to obtain a constant weight during the drying 

process. After discussions with EPA, Harcros was able to obtain advice on how to resolve this issue. 

However, this has caused a substantial delay which has changed the expected completion date to April of 

2013. 

Please let us know if this extension request is acceptable to EPA. If any further information is required, 

please do not hesitate to contact me at (913) 621-7802 or at asavini@harcros.com. 

Ann Marie Savini 

Harcros Chemicals Inc. 

Regulatory Specialist 

cc: Peter Radford 

Howard Stevenson 

John Miles 

James Grantham 

Don Meuschke 

File 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 

4 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 

CONTAINS NO CE' 
ORIGIN ID: KCKA <913) 621-7733 

JAKE BOOREM 

HARCROS CHEMICALS INC 

5200 SPEAKER RD 

KANSAS CITY, KS 66106 

UNITED STATES US 

SHIP DATE: 110CT12 

ACTWGT: 0.5 LB MAN 

CAD: 09784151CAFE2511 

BILL THIRD PARTY 

10 OPPT DOC CONTROL OFFICE 

EPA EAST 

., 

"' 

~ 

If 

~ ~ 

iii 

1201 CONSTITUTION AVE NW 

TSCA SECTION 4 

WASHINGTON DC 20460 

(202) 664- 8930 

REF: POSTAGE 

j I 

'I .... 'IIYI Pll'~~ Wlolo/JI .. II~ ~~~~~~"~~Nrl; 

Express 

[E)! 

~ 5408 5998 8037 

FRI - 12 OCT A1 

PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 

XC RDVA 20460 DC-US DCA