alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,671
<SECURITIES>                                   104,518
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                       171
<INVENTORY>                                        286
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               133,886
<PP&E>                                           9,292
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,052
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 149,768
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,260
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                     122,419
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   149,768
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                32,750
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,794
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   592
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,657
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,137
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,137
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .52


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service 

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury. 

# ACTION:

Notice. 

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted (via teleconference). The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. 

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 20, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 (toll-free), or 718-488-2085 (non toll-free). 

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, March 20, 2007 from 9 a.m. ET to 10 a.m. ET via a telephone conference call. Individual comments will be limited to 5 minutes. If you would like to have the TAP consider a written statement, please call 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or write Audrey Y. Jenkins, TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate in the telephone conference call meeting must be made with Audrey Y. Jenkins. Ms. Jenkins can be reached at 1-888-912-1227 or 718-488-2085, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues. 

Dated: February 13, 2007. 

John Fay, 

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

 [FR Doc. E7-2937 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
## Breadcrumb

-  National Minerals Information Center 

#           The Mineral Industry of Colorado      

      By National Minerals Information Center

-  Home 
-  Commodities 
-  Countries 
-  Materials Flow 
-  US States 
-  NMIC Seminars 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

Statistics and information on the nonfuel mineral commodities produced in Colorado

### Minerals Yearbook Vol. II - Domestic

2018-2019 data for Colorado are summarized in the table on this web page. The 2015 chapter data tables (XLS) and 2014 chapter containing text and data tables in PDF and XLS formats are available, with other years, through the links below.

Download 2014 PDF

### Sources of information

Colorado leads in the production of molybdenum concentrates, and is a major producer of fire clay, gold, and Grade-A helium. It also produces bentonite, cement, common clay, crushed stone, gypsum, industrial sand and gravel, lime, and silver.

                        - Statistical Summary
                        - Aggregates Data by State, Type, and End Use
                        - Mineral Commodity Summaries
                        - Mineral Industry Surveys
                        - Minerals Yearbook Volume I -- Metals and Minerals
                        - Mineral Yearbook Volume II - Colorado chapters

The following data table gives nonfuel mineral commodity production data for Colorado extracted from from Table 5 in the 2019 statistical summary.

eEstimated. rRevised. NA Not available. W Withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data; included in combined value. XX Not applicable.

1Includes data from the commodity chapters published in the Minerals Yearbook as they were completed and released through January 2023.

2 Production as measured by mine shipments, sales, or marketable production (including consumption by producers). Mine output measured as sold or used by producers is primarily shown in the tables, because values can be assigned. Where sold or used data are not available, actual mine output is used as the production measurement and value is estimated average price of the mineral commodity for that year. Data are reported in gross weight unless otherwise specified.

3 Data are rounded to no more than three significant digits; may not add to totals shown.

### 

### **Minerals Yearbook Volume II Colorado chapters:**

*Subscribe to receive an email notification when a publication is added to this page*.

**Current:**

|** 2014 PDF format |  2014 XLS format | 2015 tables-only release  |**

**Recent archives**:
                            - PDF Format:

| 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010-11 |  2012-13 | 2014 |
                            - XLS Format:

| 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010-11 | 2012-13 | 2014 | 2015 tables-only release  |
                            - Archive   	     |  1932-1993  |

### Contacts

#### Robert M Callaghan

##### Mineral Commodity Specialist - States

National Minerals Information Center

rcallaghan@usgs.gov

703-648-7709
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 99.1


                            CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Eleanor L. Thomas, President (chief executive officer) of
the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the
"Managing Owner"), of World Monitor Trust--Series B ("Series B"), hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) Series B's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
   June 28, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
   date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), fully complies with the requirements
   of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
   all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
   Series B.


/s/ Eleanor L. Thomas
_________________________
Eleanor L. Thomas
President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner
August 12, 2002



   The undersigned, Steven Weinreb, Chief Financial Officer of the managing
owner, the Managing Owner, of Series B, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

   (1) Series B's Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
   all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
   Series B.


/s/ Steven Weinreb
_________________________
Steven Weinreb
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner
August 12, 2002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

CUMIS INSURANCE SOCIETY, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 05-1277 (PLF)

)

REGINALD CLARK, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiff CUMIS Insurance Society, Inc. (“CUMIS”) and defendant Reginald 

Clark advised the court they had reached an agreed resolution in the joint status report they filed 

on July 25, 2019 [Dkt. No. 181]. Since then, the Court has stayed the matter, based on 

representations in the parties’ periodic joint status reports that the preparation of the Settlement 

Agreement is ongoing. Based on the representation in the November 19, 2019 joint status report 

[Dkt. No. 187] that CUMIS and Mr. Clark are still working on the terms of the Settlement 

Agreement, the matter will be stayed until December 13, 2019. If CUMIS and Mr. Clark are not 

able to reach a settlement by that date, they are instructed to file a joint status report on or before 

December 13, 2019.

In the November 19, 2019 joint status report, the parties also ask the Court to stay 

the litigation related to Tonia Shuler’s motion to vacate the default judgment entered against her. 

See November 19, 2019 Joint Status Report [Dk. No. 187] at 1. While the report indicates that 

Ms. Shuler’s motion is “related to the pending Settlement,” Tonia Shuler is not a signatory to the 

November 19, 2019 Joint Status Report, nor was she served with a copy of the November 19,
2

2019 Joint Status Report, according to the certificate of service. See November 19, 2019 Joint 

Status Report [Dkt. No. 187] at 1-2. If the parties wish the litigation related to Ms. Shuler’s 

motion to vacate the default judgment entered against her to be stayed along with the rest of the 

case, they are instructed to file a motion to stay that complies with Local Civil Rule 7(m), so the 

Court knows that (1) Ms. Shuler has been apprised of the ongoing settlement negotiations that 

the November 19, 2019 Joint Status Report says now include her, and (2) either concurs or does 

not object to her matter being stayed. See L. CIV. R. 7(m) (requiring parties to confer with 

opposing counsel, including parties appearing pro se, and include in the motion a “statement that 

the required discussion occurred, and a statement as to whether the motion is opposed”). 

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the matter as to CUMIS and Mr. Clark is STAYED until 

December 13, 2019; it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that if the parties are not able to reach a settlement by that 

date, they are instructed to file a joint status report on or before December 13, 2019; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that after conferring with Tonia Shuler, the parties will 

file a motion that complies with Local Civil Rule 7(m), requesting that Ms. Shuler’s matter also 

be stayed.

SO ORDERED. 

_______________________________

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: November 21, 2019
ex10-1.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit 10.1

     

    DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

    
       

      
        	
                $1,000,000 

              	
                July 8,
      2008

              


      

       

    

     

               FOR
VALUE RECEIVED, Nature Vision, Inc., a Minnesota corporation (the “Company”), promises to pay to
Richard Kiphart or his successors or assigns (“Holder”), ON DEMAND AT ANY
TIME AFTER JUNE 30, 2010, at such place as the Holder of this Note may designate
in writing to the Company, the principal sum of One Million Dollars
($1,000,000), together with simple interest on the unpaid principal balance from
the date of this Note until fully paid at the rate of fifteen percent (15%) per
annum, based on actual days elapsed in a year of 365 days.  Principal
and interest are due and payable in lawful money of the United States of
America.

     

               Accrued
but unpaid interest is due and payable in monthly installments, with each
installment equal to the amount of interest that accrued under this Note during
the immediately preceding month, commencing on August 1, 2008, and continuing on
the first day of each month thereafter until all amounts owing under this Note
have been paid in full.  The first payment due on August 1,
2008 will include all interest accrued from July 1, 2008.

     

    This Note
is issued in renewal, amendment, replacement, extension and restatement of that
certain Promissory Note dated as of October 19, 2007 in the original
principal balance of $1,000,000 issued by the Company to the Holder (the “Prior Note”).

     

    This Note
may be fully or partially prepaid at any time during the term of this Note
without penalty or premium.  Any prepayment shall be applied first to
accrued but unpaid interest and the remainder to principal.

     

               The
Company waives presentment, dishonor, protest, demand, diligence, notice of
protest, notice of demand, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, and any
other notice of any kind otherwise required by law in connection with the
delivery, acceptance, performance, default, enforcement or collection of this
Note and expressly agrees that this Note, or any payment hereunder, may be
extended or subordinated (by forbearance or otherwise) at any time, without in
any way affecting the liability of the Company.

     

               The
Company agrees to pay on demand all reasonable
costs of collecting or enforcing payment under this Note, including
attorney fees and legal expenses, whether through courts of original
jurisdiction, courts of appellate jurisdiction, or bankruptcy courts, or through
other legal proceedings.

     

               This
Note may not be amended or modified, nor shall any waiver of any provision
hereof be effective, except only by an instrument in writing signed by the party
against whom enforcement of any amendment, modification, or waiver is
sought.  This Note shall be governed by and construed according to the
laws of the State of Minnesota without regard to conflicts of laws
principles.

     

    
      	 	NATURE VISION,
      INC.	
            
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	By:	 	 
	 	Its:
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4260 — Advent/RWE Solutions)

(2006/C 177/14)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 17 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 1 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 2 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 3 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 4 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 5 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 6 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 7 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 8 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 9 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 10 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 11 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 12 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 13 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 14 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 15 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 16 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 17 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 18 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 19 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 20 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 21 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 22 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 23 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 24 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 25 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 26 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 27 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 28 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 29 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 30 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 31 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 32 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 33 of 34
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-11 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 34 of 34
No. 55200.

#### Terrazzo & Marble Supply Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 159363-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of travertine stone similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 53963, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1216 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1216

 To clarify that an authorization to use military force, a declaration 
  of war, or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention 
 without charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of 
               the United States, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2017

  Mr. Lee (for himself, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Whitehouse, Ms. 
 Collins, and Mr. Coons) introduced the following bill; which was read 
          twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify that an authorization to use military force, a declaration 
  of war, or any similar authority shall not authorize the detention 
 without charge or trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of 
               the United States, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Due Process Guarantee Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE INDEFINITE DETENTION OF CITIZENS AND LAWFUL 
              PERMANENT RESIDENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 4001 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) No citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States 
shall be imprisoned or otherwise detained by the United States except 
consistent with the Constitution and pursuant to an Act of Congress 
that expressly authorizes such imprisonment or detention.''.
    (b) Relationship to an Authorization To Use Military Force, 
Declaration of War, or Similar Authority.--Section 4001 of title 18, 
United States Code, as amended by subsection (a) is further amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (b) as subsection (c); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b)(1) A general authorization to use military force, a 
declaration of war, or any similar authority, on its own, shall not be 
construed to authorize the imprisonment or detention without charge or 
trial of a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the United States 
apprehended in the United States.
    ``(2) Paragraph (1) applies to an authorization to use military 
force, a declaration of war, or any similar authority enacted before, 
on, or after the date of the enactment of the Due Process Guarantee 
Act.
    ``(3) This section shall not be construed to authorize the 
imprisonment or detention of a citizen of the United States, a lawful 
permanent resident of the United States, or any other person who is 
apprehended in the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Richard LEIDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, United States Treasury Department, and Paul H. O’Neill, Secretary of the Treasury, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-1097.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 30, 2001.

ON MOTION

ORDER

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

Richard Leider moves for reconsideration of the court’s February 15, 2001 order dismissing his appeal for failure to file a brief or to submit an entry of appearance form.

This case was transferred from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Leider states that he did not file a brief because the case was fully briefed before transfer and he believed that the Ninth Circuit’s entire file, including the briefs, would be transferred and the appeal would be placed on this court’s docket as “fully briefed.” While parties in a transferred case may elect to proceed in this court on the briefs previously filed in the other court, Fed. Cir. R. 28(j) specifies the procedure that must be followed. Rule *94928(j) provides that the parties in a case transferred after the briefs have been filed from another court of appeals may stipulate to proceed on those briefs instead of filing briefs prescribed by the rules of this court. Fed. Cir. R. 28(j) further provides that the number of briefs required by Fed. Cir. R. 31(b) must accompany any stipulation. Based on the circumstances of this case, the court grants Leider’s motion to reinstate his appeal.*

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) Leider’s motion for reconsideration is granted.

(2) The February 15, 2001 dismissal order is vacated, the mandate is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated.

(3) Within 14 days of the date of filing of this order, the parties may file a motion for leave to proceed on the briefs filed in the Ninth Circuit. Any motion should specify whether a joint appendix was filed in the Ninth Circuit and, if not, when an appendix will be filed here. If no motion to proceed on the Ninth Circuit briefs is submitted, Leider’s opening brief is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

*

 Leider's counsel has been admitted to this court and has submitted an entry of appearanee form.