alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 Of The United States Code**

 

I, J. Patrick Spainhour, the Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  J. Patrick Spainhour |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | J.  Patrick Spainhour     |
|   | August 29,  2008     |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Thaddeus Dupper, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ THADDEUS DUPPER                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Thaddeus Dupper                       |   |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| November 12, 2008                |   |

 

 

This certificationis furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification willnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat we specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________

IN RE: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/ :

FENFLURAMINE/DEXFENFLURAMINE) : MDL DOCKET NO. 1203

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION :

 :

VERA WILLIAMS, et al. :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-20138

:

AMERICAN HOME PRODS. CORP., et al. :

 :

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 

AND NOW, on this 1st day of May, 2008, upon

consideration of the motion of Elmire Jacobs for substitution, it

is hereby ORDERED that Elmire Jacobs, as the representative of

the Estate of Milton Jacobs, is substituted for the named

plaintiff in this action.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III 

C.J.

Case 2:02-cv-20138-HB Document 14 Filed 05/01/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL :

MARKETING B.V., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, : NO. 05-3078

 :

v. :

:

THE PUROLITE COMPANY, :

:

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14 day of October, 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff ECEM European

th

Chemical MarketingB.V.’s Post-Trial Motion for New Trial (Doc. No. 118), Defendant The Purolite

Company’s Response in Opposition to the Motion for New Trial (Doc. No. 123), and arguments of

counsel for the parties at the hearing held on September 7, 2010, and for the reasons set forth in the

Court’s Opinion dated October 14, 2010, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s request for a new trial on

the counter-claim of Defendant The Purolite Company as contained in Plaintiff’s Motion for PostTrial Relief is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J. 

 JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PATTY L. SCHUMACHER, : CIVIL ACTION

 : 

 v. : 

Plaintiff, :

: NO. 02-4477

SOUDERTON AREA SCHOOL :

DISTRICT, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this ___ day of February, 2004, it is hereby ORDERED that the

proceeding held on November 22, 2002, in the above-captioned matter, is UNDER SEAL. The

parties to this action shall apply by Motion to this Court for authorization to have the proceeding

transcribed. 

This ORDER is entered WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the exercise of the

jurisdiction and procedural rules of the Third Circuit regarding appeal of matter under seal in the

District Court. 

BY THE COURT:

_____________________

JAMES T. GILES C.J.

copies by FAX on

to

Case 2:02-cv-04477-JG Document 20 Filed 02/27/2004 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

STEVE ENRIQUE QUINTERO RIOS,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-17-00045-CR

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150D04760)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until April 5, 2018. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE STATE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza, the State’s attorney, prepare the 

State’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 5, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of February, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
From: "Tim Adamowicz" <Tim.Adamowicz@ormet.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "John Reggi" <John.Reggi@ormet.com>

Date: 12/29/2010 11:47 AM

Subject: RE: Allowable Paste Plant Emission Calculations

It is a batch process.

From: Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Boyd.Rochelle@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:47 AM

To: John Reggi; Tim Adamowicz

Subject: Allowable Paste Plant Emission Calculations

In our calculations for allowable paste plant emissions we were going to use the limit for batch mixers but 

I figured I would just check to see if you have a continuous or batch paste plant production process so 

that we can have an accurate allowable calculation?

Rochelle Boyd, Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Sector Policies and Programs Division

109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711

Mail Drop D243-02

Ph: (919) 541-1390 Fax: (919) 541-3207

Email: boyd.rochelle@epa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET, AND
THE SUMMARY OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CONTAINED IN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM
10-K TO WHICH THIS EXHIBIT IS ATTACHED AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL SCHEDULES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             0
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                243,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                  17,900
<INVENTORY>                                  182,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             426,200
<PP&E>                                     4,011,400
<DEPRECIATION>                             2,642,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,342,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        644,300
<BONDS>                                      307,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                   210,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               2,342,800
<SALES>                                    2,394,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           2,397,300
<CGS>                                      2,278,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              2,280,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            48,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (12,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (3,500)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (9,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (8,800)
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                (17,900)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0


</TABLE>
Appendix I of TFM 2-4700

Jaime M. Saling

February 9, 2017

1

Reduce redundant guidance published by the Department of the Treasury to eliminate the risk of publishing inconsistent guidance to the agencies.

Objective

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

TFM 2-4700 : Appendix I

Reclassified Balance Sheet

Line Item Descriptions

Reclassified Statement of Net Cost

Line Item Descriptions

Reclassified Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position

Line Item Descriptions

TFM 2-4700 : Appendix I

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Reclassified Financial Statements

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

 TFM 2-4700 : Appendix I

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

USSGL Section IV: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Line Item Descriptions

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Page ‹#›

TFM 2-4700 : Appendix I

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

USSGL Section II: Accounts and Definitions

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Fiscal Year 2017 Proposed Changes

Reclassified Financial Statements

Line Item Descriptions

TFM 2-4700 : Appendix I

USSGL Supplement

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Send agency concerns, questions, suggestions, etc. to Financial.Reports@fiscal.treasury.gov by March 16

Next Steps

Financial Report Questions:

Financial.Reports@fiscal.treasury.gov

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

 Jaime M. Saling

	Department of the Treasury	Bureau of the Fiscal Service

	(304) 480-5129

	Jaime.Saling@fiscal.treasury.gov

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

Contact Information

‹#›

12

# image1.png

# image3.png

# image8.png

# image9.png

# image10.png

# image11.png

# image12.png

# image13.png
No. 52948.

#### Washington State Liquor Control Board *v.*United States,

protest 132841-K (Seattle).

*265Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Oust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protest was overruled in all other respects.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JAMES BURNETT and

LETHA A. BURNETT

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4236

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04236-LDD Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
© 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 53

Appendix

Appendix

6SHFLÀFDWLRQV

Aircraft

Weight (Battery & 

Propellers Included)

1280 g

Max. Ascent Speed 5 m/s

Max. Descent Speed 3 m/s

Max. Speed 16 m/s (ATTI mode, no wind)

Max. Flight Altitude 6000 m

Max. Flight Time Approximately 23 minutes

Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C

GPS Mode GPS/GLONASS

Gimbal 

Controllable Range Pitch: - 90° to + 30°

Vision Positioning

Velocity Range < 8 m/s (2 m above ground)

Altitude Range 30 cm-300 cm

Operating Range 30 cm-300 cm

Operating Environment Brightly lit (lux > 15) patterned surfaces

Camera

Sensor Sony EXMOR 1/2.3” Effective pixels:12.4 M (total pixels: 12.76 M)

Lens FOV 94° 20mm(35mm format equivalent ) f/2.8

ISO Range 100-3200(video) 100-1600(photo)

Electronic Shutter Speed 8s -1/8000s

Image Max. Size 4000 x 3000

Still Photography Modes

Single shot

Burst shooting: 3/5/7 frames

Auto Exposure Bracketing (AEB): 3/5 

Bracketed frames at 0.7EV Bias

Time-lapse

Supported SD Card Types

Micro SD

Max. capacity: 64 GB. Class 10 or UHS-1 rating required

Video Recording Modes

FHD:1920x1080p 24/25/30/48/50/60 

HD:1280x720p 24/25/30/48/50/60

Max. Bitrate Of Video 

Storage

40 Mbps

Supported File Formats

FAT32/exFAT

Photo: JPEG, DNG

Video: MP4/MOV (MPEG-4 AVC/H.264)

Operating Temperature 

Range

0°C to 40°C
54 © 2015 DJI. All Rights Reserved. 

Appendix

Phantom 3 Advanced User Manual

Remote Controller 

Operating Frequency 2.400 GHz-2.483 GHz

Transmitting Distance 2000 m (Outdoor And Unobstructed)

Video Output Port USB

Operating Temperature Range 0°C- 40°C

Battery 6000 mAh LiPo 2S

Mobile Device Holder Tablets and smartphones 

Transmitter Power(EIRP) FCC: 20 dbm; CE:16 dbm

Working Voltage 1.2 A @7.4 V

Charger

Voltage 17.4 V

Rated Power 57 W 

Intelligent Flight Battery ( PH3-4480 mAh-15.2 V )

Capacity 4480 mAh

Voltage 15.2 V

Battery Type LiPo 4S

Energy 68 Wh

Net Weight 365 g

Operating Temperature -10°C- 40°C

Max. Charging Power 100 W

"JSDSBGU4UBUVT*OEJDBUPS%FTDSJQUJPO

Normal

 Red, Green and Yellow Flash 

Alternatively Turning on and Self-Diagnostics

 Green and Yellow Flash Alternatively Aircraft Warming Up

 Green Flashes Slowly Safe to Fly (P-mode with GPS and Vision Positioning)

X2 Green Flashes Twice Safe to Fly (P-mode with Vision Positioning but without GPS)

 Yellow Flashes Slowly Safe to Fly (A-mode but No GPS and Vision Positioning)

Warning

 Fast Yellow Flashing Remote Controller Signal Lost

 Slow Red Flashing Low Battery Warning

 Fast Red Flashing Critical Battery Warning

 Red Flashing Alternatively IMU Error 

— Solid Red Critical Error 

 Red and Yellow Flash Alternatively Compass Calibration Required
EXHIBIT 13.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Industrial Development Bank of
Israel Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Rimon Shmaya, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Rimon Shmaya
----------------
Name: Rimon Shmaya
Title: Comptroller
Date: January 26, 2005
DRAFT

ID

Simple or

Special Name Type Description Error Message 

51 SPECIAL

Backdated Transaction and Prior Year Adjustment Compound

If a transaction has been backdated to a previous fiscal year in CARS, then the Prior Year Adjustment for the transaction is B. The Backdated Transaction field on the SMAF will be Y (yes) if a backdated transaction has been processed.

If a transaction has been backdated to in CARS, then the Prior Year Adjustmeis B. The Backdated Transaction field o(yes) if a backdated transaction has be

89 SPECIAL

Limited Use of USSGL 153200 Compound

The use of USSGL account 153200 is limited to specific TAS. Unauthorized use of USSGL account 1

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Summary

Part 1SUPPLEMENT

Bulletin No. 2017-16 DRAFT VII VSR - 1
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 1 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 2 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 3 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 4 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 5 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 6 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 7 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 8 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 9 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 10 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 11 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 12 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 13 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 14 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 15 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 16 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 17 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 18 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 19 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 20 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 21 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 22 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 23 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 24 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 25 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 26 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 27 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 28 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 29 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 30 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 31 of 32
Case 2:02-cv-04434-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 32 of 32
Before the Third Division,

August 8, 1945

No. 50399.

#### Protest 78516-K of Thomas Allen 3d (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HEATHER D., a minor individual, by and : CIVIL ACTION

through her parents and natural guardians :

JUDY D. and JAMES D., and JAMES D., : NO. 01-770

individually and JUDY D. individually, : NO. 03-3852

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

NORTHAMPTON AREA SCHOOL :

DISTRICT, :

Defendant. :

MEMORANDUM

BUCKWALTER, S. J. August 13, 2007

Plaintiff has filed a motion for counsel fees pursuant to this court’s order of June

19, 2007, which permitted plaintiff, as prevailing parties, to petition for legal fees under IDEA.

Defendant has filed objections, a substantial part of which concerns claims for

fees billed prior to the filing of the IDEA on June 27, 2003. Plaintiff in their reply brief, rather

cursorily, states . . . “the items listed for the most part refer to all claims litigated and would be

impossible to separate them. Regardless, . . . all of the work conducted by plaintiff’s counsel and

all claims filed on behalf of plaintiffs were related to the ultimate result obtained . . . .”

(Plaintiff’s Reply Brief at 5 and 6). This is not sufficient to deny defendant’s requested

deduction.

Case 2:01-cv-00770-RB Document 64 Filed 08/13/07 Page 1 of 3
With regard to defendant’s second substantive request for deduction relative to

depositions of any other one than Dr. Lazar, Lori Nicholas and Cynthia Polka, it is not clear that

defendant is entitled to this deduction substantially for the reasons in plaintiff’s reply.

A third and fourth substantial reduction request by defendant is appropriate for

reasons set forth by defendant relative to its motion to dismiss and later for summary judgment. 

Finally, it seems equitable to also give some deduction for the settlement

conference fees requested based upon defendant’s reasoning and plaintiff’s response, which is

not exactly on point with the nature of defendant’s request. The deductions will be granted as

follows:

(a) Prior Complaint $19,251

(b) Motion to Dismiss 2,461

(c) Summary Judgment 1,966

(d) Settlement Conference 4,000

TOTAL $27,678

An order follows.

2

Case 2:01-cv-00770-RB Document 64 Filed 08/13/07 Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HEATHER D., a minor individual, by and : CIVIL ACTION

through her parents and natural guardians :

JUDY D. and JAMES D., and JAMES D., : NO. 01-770

individually and JUDY D. individually, : NO. 03-3852

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

NORTHAMPTON AREA SCHOOL :

DISTRICT, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13 day of August, 2007, it is hereby ORDERED that th

plaintiff’s petition for counsel fees (Docket No. 78) is GRANTED as follows. Counsel is

awarded:

Fees $143,626.00

Costs 3,487.76

TOTAL $147,113.76

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter, S. J. 

 RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Case 2:01-cv-00770-RB Document 64 Filed 08/13/07 Page 3 of 3
Draft IRC Handout September 25, 2018

C109 To record the receipt of previously anticipated collections. 

Comment: See USSGL TC-C108 for unidentified collections. Also post USSGL TC-A122 if authority was 

previously anticipated and apportioned or USSGL TC-A123 if authority was previously anticipated in programs 

exempt from apportionment. See USSGL TCs-A710, A712, A714, and C186 for reimbursable agreement 

transactions. See USSGL TC-C156 for the collection of interest receivable from securities held by a nonfiduciary 

deposit fund. Fiduciary deposit funds would not record a budgetary entry. See TCs C453 and C457 for daily 

inflation or deflation of Treasury Inflation Protected Securities. 

Reference: USSGL implementation guidance; USSGL Budgetary Accounting Guide 

Budgetary Entry 

Debit 426000 Actual Collections of Governmental-Type Fees 

Debit 426100 Actual Collections of Business-Type Fees 

Debit 426200 Actual Collections of Loan Principal 

Debit 426300 Actual Collections of Loan Interest 

Debit 426400 Actual Collections of Rent 

Debit 426500 Actual Collections From Sale of Foreclosed Property 

Debit 426600 Other Actual Business-Type Collections From Non-Federal Sources 

Debit 426700 Other Actual Governmental-Type Collections From Non-Federal Sources 

Debit 427300 Interest Collected From Treasury 

Debit 427600 Actual Collections From Financing Fund 

Debit 427700 Other Actual Collections - Federal 

Credit 406000 Anticipated Collections From Non-Federal Sources 

Credit 407000 Anticipated Collections From Federal Sources 

Proprietary Entry 

Debit 101000 Fund Balance With Treasury 

Credit 131000 Accounts Receivable 

Credit 132000 Funded Employment Benefit Contributions Receivable

Credit 134000 Interest Receivable - Not Otherwise Classified 

Credit 134100 Interest Receivable - Loans 

Credit 134200 Interest Receivable - Investments 

Credit 134300 Interest Receivable - Taxes 

Credit 135000 Loans Receivable 

Credit 136000 Penalties and Fines Receivable - Not Otherwise Classified 

Credit 136100 Penalties and Fines Receivable - Loans 

Credit 136300 Penalties and Fines Receivable - Taxes 

Credit 137000 Administrative Fees Receivable - Not Otherwise Classified 

Credit 137100 Administrative Fees Receivable - Loans 

Credit 137300 Administrative Fees Receivable - Taxes 

Credit 139900 Allowance for Subsidy 

Credit 155100 Foreclosed Property 

Credit 510000 Revenue From Goods Sold 

Credit 520000 Revenue From Services Provided 

Credit 531000 Interest Revenue - Other 

Credit 531100 Interest Revenue - Investments 

Credit 531200 Interest Revenue - Loans Receivable/Uninvested Funds 

Credit 532000 Penalties and Fines Revenue 

Credit 532500 Administrative Fees Revenue 

Credit 540000 Funded Benefit Program Revenue 

Credit 550000 Insurance and Guarantee Premium Revenue 

Credit 575000 Expenditure Financing Sources - Transfers-In

Credit 590000 Other Revenue

Credit 599700 Financing Sources Transferred In From Custodial Statement Collections