alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust-Series C
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>

<CIK>               1051824

<NAME>              World Monitor Trust-Series C
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-25-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos

<CASH>                          16,761,787

<SECURITIES>                    498,213

<RECEIVABLES>                   67,901

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                17,327,901

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  17,327,901

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           278,253

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      17,049,648

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    17,327,901

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,703,104

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                829,203

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    873,901

<EPS-BASIC>                   6.49

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
for the period ended September 26, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Linda L. Lowry,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                              By:  /s/ LINDA L. LOWRY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Linda L. Lowry *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: November 6, 2003
_______________________

* Linda L. Lowry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-09-393-CV

ROGER K. PARSONS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF ESTHER ANN KARTSOTIS PARSONS

	APPELLANT

	V.

CONOCOPHILLIPS F/K/A CONOCO, INC. AND E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY

	APPELLEES

	----------

	FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss The Appeal For Want Of Jurisdiction.” 

	We received appellant’s pro se notice of appeal on October 22, 2009.  On November 12, 2009, we sent a letter to appellant stating that the court may not have jurisdiction over this appeal in that the trial court’s July 24, 2009 order does not appear to be a final, appealable order because it does not appear to dispose of all the issues and parties in the underlying case.  On November 23, 2009, we received appellant’s motion to retain the appeal on the docket and granted the parties until December 31, 2009 to furnish this court with a signed copy of the final order that appellant seeks to appeal.  On February 2, 2010, we received a copy of the trial court’s final judgment signed January 25, 2010, and we sent a letter to all parties stating that the court has jurisdiction over appellant’s appeal.

	Appellant has now filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the case should be dismissed because no final, appealable order was furnished to this court by the December 31, 2009 deadline.  Because appellant is requesting that we dismiss his appeal, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal without prejudice.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  WALKER, MCCOY, and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED:    April 1March 235, 2010
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-17	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/21/21
No. 50924.

#### Protest 483809-G of Sack & Bernstein, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the mer•chandise consist of goatskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros., Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, G. A. *D.*302). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
hbp-ex1022_40.htm



EXHIBIT 10.22

 

 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED EXECUTIVE AGREEMENT

 

This Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Executive Agreement (the "Amendment") is effective as of December 18, 2020 (the “Effective Date”) and amends that certain Amended and Restated  Executive Agreement effective as of March 16, 2016 (the “Agreement”) between Huttig Building Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), and Jon Vrabely (the "Executive"). All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 

 

WHEREAS, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company experienced disruptions to the business and implemented cost containment measures to mitigate the impact of the pandemic on the Company’s financial position; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company temporarily imposed a 20% pay cut to the base salary compensation for members of the executive management team; 

 

WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company entered into the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Executive Agreement dated April 27, 2020 (“First Amendment”) with Mr. Vrabely temporarily reducing his Base Salary by twenty percent (20%);

 

WHEREAS, by action of the Board of Directors on December 18, 2020, the Board approved the reinstatement of Mr. Vrabely’s base salary of $600,000 commencing on January 1, 2020;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto agree that the Agreement is amended as follows: 

 

1.Reinstatement of Original Base Salary. Paragraph 3(a)(i) of the Agreement is hereby amended so that, effective for pay periods beginning after January 1, 2021, the Executive’s annual base salary of Six Hundred Thousand Dollars ($600,000.00) (the “Base Salary”) shall be fully reinstated and the temporary salary reduction effected by the First Amendment shall no longer be in effect. 

2.No Effect on Severance Payments.  The Executive’s Base Salary shall be deemed to be his base salary for the purposes of the calculation of any Severance Payment payable to the Executive pursuant to Paragraph 4 of the Agreement or any termination payment payable to the Executive pursuant to Paragraph 4 of the Agreement; that is, any such calculation shall be made without regard to the salary reduction as provided in the First Amendment and the Base Salary as defined herein shall apply.

3.No Other Changes; Execution in Counterparts. Except as specifically modified by this Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed via .pdf and sent in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

[signature page next]

 



 

Accept and agreed as of the Effective Date set forth above. 

 

 

HUTTIG BUILDING PRODUCTS, INC.

 

 

By: /s/Del Tanner

Name:  Del Tanner

Title:   Chairman

 

 

EXECUTIVE:

 

 

/s/Jon Vrabely

Jon Vrabely

- 2 -
February 8, 2011 

Mr. Aaron H. Armstrong 

Director of Quality Assurance 

Trans States Airlines, LLC 

11495 Navaid Road 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

Dear Mr. Armstrong: 

We have received your email dated December 17, 2010, withdrawing your 

November 30, 2010, petition on behalf of Trans States Airlines for an exemption from 

§ 121.1109 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). 

No further action will be taken on your petition. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and 

 Airport Rules Division
(Part 1SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection III) (U.S. Standard General LedgerAccount Transaction Postings)

 (R = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Reverse’ in the Comment. AP = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Also Post’ in the Comment.) (Bulletin No. 2017-07) (III AP - 10) (August 2017)
Case No. 8,404.

#### In re LIVERMORE.

[5 Law Rep. 370.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Aug., 1842.

Practice — Unnecessary Delay — Negligence.

In bankruptcy.

Mr. Livermore, pro se.

A. Benedict, for the creditors.

THE COURT,

after a detailed opinion upon the points in contestation in this case, stated that the rules of the court were de■signed to prevent unnecessary delays in causes, and that strict diligence would be ■enforced in supporting opposition to petitioners, and accordingly the creditor must take an order on the docket for hearing within two days on points of law, and if his objections are to matters of fact, instanter on filing them, for a reference to a commissioner. The execution of the reference will only be suspended to abide the decision on the questions of law when those present •a bar to the petition. An omission to take the appropriate step within a reasonable time will be deemed a waiver of the objections.

THE COURT decided that objections filed against a decree of bankruptcy cannot, without an express order at the time, be •continued and employed against the application for a discharge. The opposition in the latter case, resting upon distinct principles, must be made at the time indicated by the notice and rules, and in the appropriate manner. That accordingly the course pursued by the creditors was irregular and would be nugatory had the bankrupt proceeded correctly and with diligence. But having been guilty of laches himself, and now applying to the favor of the court to Tectify his omissions, it was ordered that "the creditors have leave to show cause, the ■day after to-morrow, why he should not be permitted to take his amendments nunc pro tunc, and enter his final decree.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

BOUTIN DENTINO GIBSON 

DI GIUSTO HODELL INC.

Chris Gibson, Esq., SBN 073353

555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500

Sacramento, CA 95814-4603

(916) 321-4444

(916) 4410-7597

Attorneys for defendant

Zeta Development Labs, Inc.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OPHTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS, a

California corporation,

Plaintiff,

vs.

MARK FUKUHARA, ET AL.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.: CIV S-04-0482 LKK DAD

SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEYS

AND ORDER

Date Action Filed: March 9, 2004

Trial Date: April 18, 2006

Defendant Zeta Development Labs, Inc.substitutes Chris Gibson of the firm of Boutin

Dentino Gibson Di Giusto Hodell Inc, 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500, Sacramento, California 95814,

as its attorney of record in this action in place of Daniel P. Maguire and Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt,

Gould & Birney, LLP.

ZETA DEVELOPMENT LABS, INC.

Dated: May 23, 2005 By /s/ Johnny Justice, Jr.

Johnny Justice, Jr., President

BOUTIN DENTINO GIBSON DI GIUSTO HODELL, INC.

Dated: May 31, 2005 By /s/ Chris Gibson

Chris Gibson

WILKE,FLEURY HOFFELT,GOULD & BIRNEY,LLP

Dated: May 31, 2005 By /s/ Anthony J. DeCristoforo

Anthony J. DeCristoforo

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 126 Filed 06/13/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL P. MAGUIRE

Dated: May 31, 2005 By /s/ Daniel P. Maguire

Daniel P. Maguire

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 13, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 126 Filed 06/13/05 Page 2 of 2
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BLACKWATER SECURITY 

CONSULTING, LLC, a Delaware Limited 

Liability Company; and BLACKWATER 

LODGE AND TRAINING CENTER, INC., a 

Delaware Corporation

Plaintiffs,

vs.

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Georgia 

Corporation

and

EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, an 

Illinois Corporation

and

FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY 

OF NEW YORK, a South Carolina 

Corporation

and

LIBERTY INSURANCE 

UNDERWRITERS, a Massachusetts 

Corporation

Defendants.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-6020

DEFENDANT, WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE

COMPANY’S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL

SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE DUTY TO DEFEND AGAINST

WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY AND 

CROSS MOTION FOR ADDITIONAL DISCOVERY PURSUANT TO F.R.Civ.P. 56(f) 

Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company (“WSLIC”), by and through 

its attorneys, Deasey, Mahoney & Valentini, Ltd., respectfully responds to Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Partial Summary Judgment on the duty to defend and, pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56(f) cross motions 

for additional discovery in reliance upon the Affidavit of Keith Phillips, incorporated by 

reference hereto and attached to the Memorandum of Law in support of WSLIC’s response. 

Essentially, Plaintiffs’ Motion requests a declaration regarding WSLIC’s duty to defend 

Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 2

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 60

Dockets.Justia.com
2

Plaintiffs in the underlying action captioned Nordan v. Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC, et 

al., 05-CVS-000173 (hereinafter “Nordan litigation”) pursuant to WSLIC’s CGL policy No. 

GLW778197. In short, Plaintiffs’ Motion is moot as WSLIC has discharged its duty to defend 

Blackwater in connection with the Nordan litigation under a complete Reservation of Rights. To 

the extent that Plaintiffs’ Motion seeks a declaration that the grounds upon which WSLIC has 

reserved rights are inappropriate, WSLIC moves for additional discovery pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 

56(f) to obtain facts not currently available to WSLIC and in Plaintiffs’ possession in order to 

oppose Plaintiffs’ Motion. In support of this Response and Crossclaim, WSLIC relies upon and 

incorporates the attached Memorandum of Law and Affidavit of Keith Phillips pursuant to 

F.R.Civ.P. 56(f) in support thereof.

WHEREFORE, Defendant Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company respectfully

requests that this Court enter the accompanying proposed Order pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 56(f).

Respectfully Submitted,

DATE: 8-10-07 BY: /s/ Francis J. Deasey (Valid Code FD1214)_________

/s/ James W. Daly (Valid Code JD1216)___________

/s/ Michael F. Schleigh (Valid Code MS9874)

FRANCIS J. DEASEY, ESQUIRE (Atty. ID 25699)

JAMES W. DALY, ESQUIRE (Atty. ID 37660)

MICHAEL F. SCHLEIGH, ESQUIRE (Atty. ID 88407)

Deasey, Mahoney & Valentini, Ltd.

1601 Market St., Suite 3400

Philadelphia, PA 19103

215-587-9400 (PHONE)/215-587-9456 (FAX)

Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 15.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-137695) of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. and in the related prospectus of our report dated June 18, 2007, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of América Móvil,S.A.B. de C.V., América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V.’s management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over internal control over financialreporting of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

Mancera, S.C. 

A member firm of 

Ernst & Young Global 

            /s/ Agustín Aguilar Laurents            

C.P.C. Agustín Aguilar Laurents 

Mexico City, Mexico 

June 18, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24819]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Issuance of Revised OMB Circular No. A-4, ``Regulatory Analysis''

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is announcing the 
issuance of the revised Circular A-4, ``Regulatory Analysis.''

ADDRESSES: Circular A-4, ``Regulatory Analysis,'' is available at 
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CircularA-4.pdf. 
``OMB Circular No. A-4: Explanation and Response to Public Input''--a 
document providing explanations of OMB's decisions that are reflected 
in the revisions to Circular A-4, as well as responses to public 
comments and peer reviewers' reports on the draft revisions--is 
available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CircularA-4Explanation.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Office of Management and Budget, 
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, at MBX.OMB.OIRA 
.<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8fcebbc2e0ebeafde1e6f5eefbe6e0e1cfe0e2eda1eae0ffa1e8e0f9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ecadd8a18388899e8285968d98858382ac83818ec289839cc28b839a">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB announces the issuance of the revised 
Circular A-4, ``Regulatory Analysis.'' OMB Circular No. A-4 provides 
the Office of Management and Budget's guidance to Federal agencies on 
the development of regulatory analysis as required under section 
6(a)(3)(C) of Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993 (Regulatory 
Planning and Review), as amended; the Regulatory Right-to-Know Act, 
Public Law 106-554, 624, 114 Stat. 2763, 2763A-161 (2000) (codified as 
amended at 31 U.S.C. 1105 note); and a variety of related authorities. 
The Circular also provides guidance to agencies on the regulatory 
accounting statements that are required under the Regulatory Right-to-
Know Act. The new Circular is available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CircularA-4.pdf.
    This Circular supersedes and rescinds the previous version of OMB 
Circular No. A-4, issued on September 17, 2003.
    A draft of this Circular was subject to public comment, external 
peer review, and interagency review.

Richard L. Revesz,
Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2023-24819 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 80712]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25528]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2736-046]


Idaho Power Company; Notice of Tribal Consultation Meeting

    a. Project Name and Number: American Falls Hydroelectric Project 
No. 2736-046.
    b. Applicant: Idaho Power Company.
    c. Date and Time of Meeting: November 27, 2023, from 11:00 a.m. to 
12:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.
    d. FERC Contact: Golbahar Mirhosseini, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#296e46454b4841485b0764405b41465a5a4c404740694f4c5b4a074e465f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1e6cecdc3c0c9c0d38fecc8d3c9ced2d2c4c8cfc8e1c7c4d3c28fc6ced7">[email protected]</span></a>.
    e. Purpose of Meeting: Commission staff will hold a meeting with 
staff from the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes to discuss the Tribe's comments 
on scoping document and any concerns regarding the proposed American 
Falls Hydroelectric Project. The meeting will be held remotely via 
Microsoft Teams.
    f. All local, State, and Federal agencies, Native American Tribes, 
and other interested parties are invited to attend the meeting; 
however, participation will be limited to representation of the 
Shoshone-Bannock Tribe and the Commission's representatives. A summary 
of the meeting will be placed in the public record of this proceeding.
    g. Please email Golbahar Mirhosseini at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6700080b05060f0615490a0e150f081414020e090e270102150449000811">[email protected]</a> by November 22, 2023 at 4:30 p.m. EST, to 
RSVP and to receive specific instructions on how to participate.

    Dated: November 13, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-25528 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 2:02-cv-20139-HB Document 2 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20139-HB Document 2 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20139-HB Document 2 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-2 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 1 of 2

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 29 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 29-2 Filed 06/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit      32.1**

|  | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                            |   |   |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/              Bernard C.              Lannen |   |   |        |
| President                                       |   |   |        |
|                                                 |   |   |        |
| Dated: March 24, 2008                           |   |   |   |

----