alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED: MARCH 11, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE CO. 

DOCKET NO. FAA-2016-4261 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

~· .......... ....; 

1bis proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2013S0700189) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Ron)li A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative La 

Attachment- Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence A venue, S. W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

Winston E. Miller, Respondent's Counsel 

Frost, Brown, Todd, LLC 

400 Market Street, 32nd Floor 

Louisville, KY 40202-3363 

TEL: 502-589-0296 

FPC(: 502-581-1087 

President 

United Parcel Service, Inc., Respondent 

55 Glenlake Parkway NE 

Atlanta, GA 30328 

United Parcel Service, Inc. 

c/o Adam Briggs, Attorney 

55 Glenlake Parkway NE 

Atlanta, GA 30328 

James H. Dunfee Jr., Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Enforcement Division, Southern Team 

1701 Columbia Ave 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

F AJ(: 404-305-5223 

Hon. J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

Docket No. FAA-2016-4261 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-31 0) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

-3-
No. 52248.

protest 102091-K (New York).

#### Louis Meyers & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 21

# LIST OF SUBSIDIARIESOF
FURNITURE BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.

|                                           | Jurisdiction of
|------------------------------------------ | ---------------
|Name of Subsidiary                         | Incorporation  
|                                           |                
|Action Transport, Inc.                     | Delaware       
|Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc.        | North Carolina 
|Broyhill Home Furnishings, Inc.            | Delaware       
|Broyhill Retail, Inc.                      | Delaware       
|Broyhill Transport, Inc.                   | North Carolina 
|Classic Design Furnishings, Inc.           | Virginia       
|Decorative Hardware Solutions (L) Bhd      | Malaysia       
|D-H Retail Space, Inc.                     | Delaware       
|Drexel Heritage Furniture Industries, Inc. | Delaware       
|Fayette Enterprises, Inc.                  | Mississippi    
|HDM Furniture Industries, Inc.             | Delaware       
|Henredon Furniture Industries, Inc.        | Delaware       
|Henredon Transportation Company            | North Carolina 
|Henredon Designer Showrooms, Inc.          | Delaware       
|Lane Furniture Industries, Inc.            | Mississippi    
|Lane Home Furnishings Retail, Inc.         | Delaware       
|Laneventure, Inc.                          | Delaware       
|Maitland-Smith Asia Holdings Limited       | Vanuatu        
|Maitland-Smith Cebu, Inc.                  | Philippines    
|Maitland-Smith Furniture Industries, Inc.  | Delaware       
|Maitland-Smith Limited                     | Hong Kong      
|P.T. Maitland-Smith Indonesia              | Indonesia      
|Maitland-Smith Export (L) Bhd              | Malaysia       
|The Lane Company, Incorporated             | Virginia       
|Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.     | Delaware       
|Thomasville Home Furnishings, Inc.         | Delaware       

Lane
Furniture Industries, Inc. also does business as Laneventure.

Thomasville
Furniture Industries, Inc. also does business as Hickory Business Furniture, Founders and
Creative Interiors. Henredon Furniture Industries, Inc. also does business as Hickory
Chair Company and The Pearson Company.
EX-10.6







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.6




COGNOVIT PROMISSORY NOTE OF

JOHN D. OIL & GAS COMPANY, INC.




			
	 	 	 
	$_25,000.00
	 	MAY 27, 2008               






     For value received, the undersigned, promises to pay to the order of GREAT PLAINS EXPLORATION,
LLC the principal sum of Twenty Five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) with interest at the rate of
8% per annum. Payment of Principal and accrued interest is due and payable upon
DEMAND.



     The indebtedness evidenced hereby may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without
penalty or notice.



     Notwithstanding anything to the contrary which may be provided for, or implied by, the other
terms of this Note, the entire principal balance, together with all accrued and unpaid interest and
any other charges, advances and fees, if any, outstanding hereunder, shall be due and payable in
full on demand.



     The Maker waives demand presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest and of
non-payment, and any and all lack of diligence or delays in collection or enforcement of this Note,
and expressly consent to any extension of time of payment hereof, or any other indulgence of
forbearance, any of which may be made without notice to any party and without in any way affecting
the personal liability of any party.



     The undersigned authorize any attorney-at-law to appear in any court of record in Lake County,
Ohio after the indebtedness evidenced hereby becomes due in accordance with the terms hereof,
whether by acceleration or otherwise, and to thereupon waive the issuing and service of process,
waive presentment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of non-payment, and to confess
judgment against the undersigned Makers, in favor of the holder hereof for the amount then
appearing due together with the costs of this suit, and thereupon to waive all errors and all
rights of appeal and stays of execution.



     WARNING: BY SIGNING THIS PAPER, YOU GIVE UP YOUR RIGHT TO NOTICE AND COURT TRIAL. IF YOU DO
NOT PAY ON TIME, A COURT JUDGMENT MAY BE TAKEN AGAINST YOU WITHOUT YOUR PRIOR KNOWLEDGE AND THE
POWERS OF A COURT CAN BE USED TO COLLECT FROM YOU REGARDLESS OF ANY CLAIMS YOU MAY HAVE AGAINST THE
CREDITOR WHETHER FOR RETURNED GOODS, FAULTY GOODS, FAILURE ON HIS PART TO COMPLY WITH THE
AGREEMENT, OR ANY OTHER CAUSE.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	JOHN D. OIL & GAS COMPANY, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/      Gregory J. Osborne
 	 
	 	 	President and COO
04.04
Page 1 of 2 IRC Handout 02/15/2024

USSGL 169000 Other Investments

Section I & II – Chart of Accounts & Definitions

Account Title: Other Non-Federal Investments

Account Number: 169000

Normal Balance: Debit

Definition: This account is used to record the value of other non-federal investments owned by 

a federal entity. This account does not close at year-end.

Section IV – Attribute Table

Section V – Balance Sheet & Schedule P
Page 2 of 2 IRC Handout 02/15/2024

Section VII – GTAS Edits & Validations

• Further analysis is being conducted on whether 169000 can be added to a current edit or if a 

new edit is necessary to facilitate proper tracking of this USSGL usage compared to balances in 

Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS).

Timeline

• Should we implement this in Fiscal Year 2024?

• Or wait and make all changes effective for period 01 of FY 2025?
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Financial Innovation & Transformation
- Blog
- We Need Your Help: Do We Have the Right Ingredients

# We Need Your Help: Do We Have the Right Ingredients

            Date: February 1, 2018

There’s nothing better than a delicious pie. Or  cake. Or bread.

Eating is easy. But baking can be tricky. Is  the oven hot enough? Do we need to grease the pan?

Following every step in the process to the  letter and using the right ingredients can result in your desired outcome.

Federal financial management is a bit like  baking. By meeting the right requirements, following processes correctly (i.e.,  the steps), and choosing the best data elements (i.e., ingredients), you’ll  have far better results.

The Office of Financial Innovation and  Transformation worked to document the requirements and processes and the data  elements required to develop “recipes” for better, more efficient federal  financial management.

We’ve documented the steps: 

- **Federal Financial Management System Requirements**(FFMSR)
- Federal Financial Management Functions & Activities List
- **Federal Financial Management Business Use Cases**

We’re now at work on **Financial Management Standard Data  Elements.** These elements reflect the data  elements needed to meet the inputs, outputs, and processes defined in the  FFMSR.

Out of all this, regrettably, we will not  deliver delicious baked goods. But, these steps  and ingredients have the potential to equip federal agencies to work more  efficiently.

Agencies will be able to use these data  elements (and the other components) when evaluating their financial management  systems, acquisitions planning, transition planning, and in financial  management improvement planning. In other words, we’d all be using the same  cookbook, with better results.

One  of first uses of this material will be to help evaluate Software as a Service  solutions in partnership with GSA’s Unified Shared Service Management Office.  More information on this exciting initiative can be found at https://www.ussm.gov/. 

We’ve gotten a lot of input from some of the  best federal financial brains in the business. Over the past eight months, FIT  has collaborated with a government-wide working group, made up of  representatives of Executive Branch agencies, reviewing over 600 elements and  submitting over 300 comments to identify these core data elements.

The final inventory of 527 data elements deemed  critical for federal financial management is now available for public review.  Most of these elements can already be found in the Data Act Information Management Schema (DAIMS) or the Fiscal Service Data Registry, but we have also identified 27 more data elements that were previously not defined.

We encourage you to take a look and share your thoughts. Please visit our GitHub website (https://bureauofthefiscalservice.github.io/federalfinancialmanagement/), and let us know. Do we have the right  ingredients?

Last modified 01/30/24
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Start and Stop the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB) Application

To start the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB) application, complete the following steps:

1. Double-click the Start OTCnet Local Bridge icon located on the terminal desktop.

Or

Click Start>Programs>Start OTCnet Local Bridge

2. The OTCnet Local Bridge Startup page appears. Enter your OTCnet User ID and 

Password in the appropriate text boxes.

3. Click Log In. A Login Successful. OTCnet Local Bridge Application Started message 

appears.

• Click Cancel and the Are you sure you want to exit message appears. 

• Click Yes to cancel the OLB startup. 

• Click No to return to the OTCnet Local Bridge Startup page.

4. Click OK.

Once you start the OLB application, proceed to log in to OTCnet Online.

5. To stop the OLB application, double-click the Stop OTCnet Local Bridge icon located on 

the terminal desktop as shown in Figure 1. 

Figure 1. Stop OTCnet Local Bridge Icon

Or

Click Start>Programs>Stop OTCnet Local Bridge.

6. When the Stop OTCnet Local Bridge window and the Are you sure you want to stop the 

OTCnet Local Bridge Application? message appears, click Yes.

Application Tips

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• If you click No, the Are you sure you want to stop the OTCnet Local Bridge 

Application? message closes, and the OLB application remains running.

• Stopping the OLB application ensures the application is completely closed and that 

your OTCnet session is securely terminated.

• Before uninstalling the OLB application, you must first stop the OLB application. If 

the OLB application has been started on the terminal, ensure that it is stopped before 

uninstalling the application.

Application Tips
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of International Multifoods Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
March 1, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Gary E. Costley, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/GARY E. COSTLEYGary E. Costley
Chairman of the Board & Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:
May 12, 2003

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to International Multifoods Corporation and will be retained by International Multifoods Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---

QuickLinks
#### Nancy Lee BOGART, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NVR, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee, and NVR and Ryan Homes, Incorporated, Defendant.

Nos. 00-2005, 00-2397.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 23, 2001.

Decided April 12, 2001.

Nancy Lee Bogart, pro se. Thomas Joseph Flaherty, Elizabeth Anne Lalik, Hun-ton & Williams, McLean, VA, for appellee.

Before WILLIAMS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM.

In No. 00-2005, Nancy Lee Bogart appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice her civil action for wrongful discharge in violation of Title VII and the Americans with Disabilities Act and various interlocutory orders. In No. 00-2397, Bogart appeals the district court’s denial of her motion to provide transcripts. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. *See*
      *104
      *Bogart v. NVR, Inc.,*No. CA-99-1928-A (E.D. Va. July 7 and Sept. 11, 2000). We deny Bogart’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*AFFIRMED.*
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4238 — E.ON/Prazská Plynárenská)

(2006/C 242/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 11 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
No. 47823.

#### Protest 887124-G of Levin Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 40493 the claim at 45 percent under paragraph 409 was sustained.
#### CALIFORNIA HOUSING SECURITIES, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, In its Corporate Capacity as successor to the Resolution Trust Corporation as receiver for Sar-atoga Federal Savings & Loan Association, Intervenor-Appellee.

No. 99-71084.

D.C. No. CV-95-20410-RMW.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 16, 2001.

Decided June 13, 2001.

*520Before O’SCANNLAIN, TASHIMA, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

California Housing Securities, Inc. (“CHS”) appeals an order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The district court concluded that the FDIC, as successor to the Resolution Trust Corporation as receiver for Saratoga Savings and Loan Association (“Saratoga”), was entitled to a federal income tax refund that CHS sought from the Internal Revenue Service. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

CHS has presented no evidence to contradict the undisputed evidence that Saratoga performed the loan servicing operations and recorded the income and loss on its books.1 CHS’s statements on its tax returns, attributing the income and loss to Saratoga, constitute further evidence that Saratoga earned the income and suffered the loss that generated the tax refund. CHS has failed to cite any law in support of its argument that the income and loss should be reallocated from Saratoga to itself, and its declaration, stating that it is entitled to the refund when the income is reallocated, merely begs the question.2 “Absent any differing agreement ... a tax refund resulting solely from offsetting the losses of one member of a consolidated *521filing group against the income of that same member in a prior or subsequent year should inure to the benefit of that member.” *Western Dealer Mgmt., Inc. v. England (In re Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth Corp.),*473 F.2d 262, 265 (9th Cir.1973). For the foregoing reasons, the order of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of the FDIC is

AFFIRMED.

1

. Because the parties are familiar with the complicated facts of this case, we do not recite them here.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.

2

. The Federal Home Loan Bank Board letter on which CHS relies to support its claim that it actually owned the loan servicing rights did not undo the deal, but rather stated that its conditional approval was "not effective as to any *additional*payments to CHS contemplated by Saratoga." Excerpts of Record 241 (emphasis added).
(Reap. Dec. 10375)

Entry No. M-4951.

#### Reedy Forwarding Company, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided November 26, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Qidlfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

JohnsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise the subject of this appeal was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption after the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, and is not identified on the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury in pursuance thereto (T.D. 54521).

> 2. On or about the date of exportation of the involved merchandise, the prices in the principal markets of the country of exportation at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold for exportation to the United States, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, such prices including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States were equal to the invoice unit values plus the freight charges from the factory to Czechoslovakian border at $0.11 per carton.

> 3. The above-entitled appeal may be submitted upon this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise and issues described hereinabove and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find that the export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the chinaware involved herein and that such values are the invoice unit values, plus the freight charges from the factory to the Czechoslovakian border at $0.11 per carton.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# Bulletin No. 2023-08

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"June 2023

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"June 2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE LABORERS’ DISTRICT COUNCIL : CIVIL ACTION

CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION : NO. 02-4436-JKG

FUND, et al., :

 Plaintiffs :

 vs. :

:

MASTRO MASONERY, :

:

 Defendant :

ORDER

 NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2003, it appearing that

service of the Complaint has not been made, 

IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure the Complaint is dismissed without

prejudice as to defendant Mastro Masonery. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the dismissal will be

vacated if, within 10 days of the date of this Order plaintiff

shows good cause why service was not made within 120 days of the

date of the filing of the Complaint.

BY THE COURT:

 

James Knoll Gardner

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04436-JKG Document 4 Filed 01/24/2003 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 23, 2016

s0920 

# Order

Clerk September 23, 2016

154229

SC: 154229

In re KOZLOWSKI, Minors. COA: 330044

Livingston CC Family Division:

14

- 014681

- NA

_______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 12, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.