alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Process a Card Payment – Manual Card Entry

To capture a card payment with Manual Card Entry, complete the following steps:

1. From the Card Processing tab, click Process Card Payment. The Card Capture – Perform 

Card Transaction page appears.

OTCnet verifies the OLB connection. Next, OTCnet validates card terminal registration, 

the “Registration found!” message appears. 

2. Under Transaction Data, enter the Amount of the card payment.

3. Under Terminal Controls, click Manual Card Entry as shown in Figure 1. Press Clear to 

clear the Amount field.

Figure 1. Card Capture – Perform Card Transaction, enter Amount and click Manual Card Entry

Application Tip
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• Use Manual Card Entry only when the customer’s card is not properly read when 

the card is inserted, swiped, or tapped on the card terminal.

• When you select the Manual Card Entry button, a message appears, “Manual card 

entry should only be used as a contingency when other card payment methods do 

not work. Debit cards cannot be used for manual card entry. Are you sure you want 

to manually enter the customer’s card to complete this payment?”

• Once you click Manual Card Entry, Cancel Transaction also becomes enabled, 

and you can cancel the transaction.

• The latest version of the OLB must be installed to use Manual Card Entry.

4. Click Yes in response to the Manual Card Entry verification to proceed.

If you do not wish to proceed, click No to the Manual Card Entry verification. The screen 

returns to normal and the Process Payment, Manual Card Entry, and Clear buttons 

are clickable.

5. On the card terminal, the customer is presented with the Please Enter Card Number screen. 

The customer uses the card terminal buttons to enter the card number and presses the 

green (O) button.

6. The Please Enter Expiry Date (MM/YY) screen appears. The customer uses the card 

terminal buttons to enter the card’s expiration date and presses the green (O) button.

7. The Please Enter CCV Number screen appears. The customer uses the card terminal 

buttons to enter the card’s CCV number and presses the green (O) button.

8. The Pay Now screen appears. The customer presses either the green (O) button or the Pay 

Now button.

• On the card terminal, a number of messages may appear for the customer. After the 

customer completes the payment, you see the message, “Transaction was 

processed successfully. Card invoice ID XXXXXXXXXXXX, Amount $XX.00.”

• The Amount field is cleared out. Process Payment and Print Receipt are enabled. 

To print a receipt, you have 4-6 seconds to click Print Receipt. If Print Receipt is 

not clicked within the allotted time, it grays out.

Application Tips

Application Tip

Application Tips
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WALTER V. LUCAS,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-0586-GEB-CMK-P

vs.

B. ARNOLD, et al., 

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 29, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither

party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00586-CMK Document 61 Filed 04/11/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 29, 2005 are adopted in

full; and 

2. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant John Doe, Director of the California

Department of Corrections is dismissed.

Dated: April 11, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00586-CMK Document 61 Filed 04/11/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kit H. Tan, certify that:

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Interdyne Company;

Based on my  knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report,  fairly present in all material  respects the financial
condition,  results of  operations  and cash flows of the  registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such  disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,  particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's   disclosure  controls  and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

The  registrant's  other certifying  officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal  control over financial  reporting  which are  reasonably  likely to
adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to record,  process,  summarize and
report financial information; and

Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over financial
reporting.

Dated: September 15, 2006

                                                 By: /s/ Kit H. Tan
                                                         Kit H. Tan
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                       16
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3890 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3890

              To prohibit certain off-post demonstrations.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 7, 2024

  Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              To prohibit certain off-post demonstrations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prohibiting Certain Off-Post 
Demonstrations Act of 2024''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN OFF-POST DEMONSTRATIONS.

    (a) Prohibition.--Members of the United States Armed Forces are 
prohibited from participating in off-post demonstrations under any of 
the following circumstances:
            (1) They are on-duty.
            (2) They are in a foreign country.
            (3) The activities constitute a breach of law and order.
            (4) Violence is likely to result.
            (5) They are in uniform in violation of Department of 
        Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1334.1, ``Wearing of the Uniform,'' 
        or any successor regulation.
            (6) The demonstration is against United States military 
        action.
            (7) The demonstration is against United States support of a 
        United States ally at war.
            (8) The demonstration is outside the embassy of the United 
        States or a United States ally.
    (b) Dereliction of Duty.--Failure to adhere to the prohibition in 
subsection (a) shall be punishable under section 892 of title 10, 
United States Code (article 92 of the Uniform Code of Military 
Justice).
                                 <all>
```
### Court ofAppeals, State ofMichigan ORDER People ofMI v Daryl Edward Smith DocketNo. 338634 LC No. 89-003904-01-FC Peter D. O'Connell PresidingJudge Mark J. Cavanagh Deborah A. Servitto

Judges
The Court orders that the motion for reconsideration is GRANTED. The Court orders that the unpublished per curiam opinion released on September 20, 2018 in this matter is hereby AMENDED to correct a clerical error: the last paragraph ofthe opinion should read: We vacate the judgment of sentence. We remand to the trial court for reinstatement of Smith's original sentence imposed in 1989. We do not retain jurisdiction. In all otherrespects, the September20, 2018 opinion remains unchanged.

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. ZimmerJr., ChiefClerk, on



## NOV O 

## 22018 Date
p130070.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0070 Focus Ready Draft 11/19/2012

ENGINEER: Choudhary \ EV PV (kg/yr):

SUBMITTER:

USE:

Page 1p130070.eng

SAT (concerns) (11/09/2012): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Ecotox Related Cases:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P1B1T1 . Health: 2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 3 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 1 ppb.), No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1D

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

Page 2p130070.eng

Page 3p130070.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0070

Page 4p130070.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0070

Page 5p130070.eng

Page 6p130070.eng

Page 7
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust V and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding V, L.P. (the  "Partnership")
for the  period  ended  March 31, 2009 as filed  with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Thomas W. Perry,
Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the
General Partner of the Partnership, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING V, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ THOMAS W. PERRY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Thomas W. Perry *
                              Title:   Chief Accounting Officer and Controller,
                                       Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 14, 2009
_____________________

*  Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-2322

REGINA WASHINGTON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William G. Connelly, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-98-2455-AMD)

Submitted: December 22, 1999 Decided: January 20, 2000

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Regina Washington, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas James Cohen, SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
1 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate

judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (1994).

2 Although the district court's order is dated August 18,

1999, the district court's records show that it was entered on the

docket sheet on August 19, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order

was physically entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court's decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Regina Washington appeals from the magistrate judge’s order1

granting summary judgment to the Commissioner of Social Security on

her claim for disability benefits. Having reviewed the administrative record, we find that substantial evidence supported the

Administrative Law Judge’s decision denying benefits. See Hays v.

Sullivan, 907 F.2d 1453, 1456 (4th Cir. 1990). Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Washington v.

Apfel, No. CA-98-2455-AMD (D. Md. Aug. 19, 1999).2 We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
PUBLIC LAW 108–58—JULY 14, 2003 117 STAT. 859

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2474:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

June 25, considered and passed House.

June 27, considered and passed Senate.

WEEKLY COMPILATION OF PRESIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS, Vol. 39 (2003):

July 14, Presidential statement.

Æ

Public Law 108–58

108th Congress

An Act

To authorize the Congressional Hunger Center to award Bill Emerson and Mickey

Leland Hunger Fellowships for fiscal years 2003 and 2004.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY AUTHORITY FOR CONGRESSIONAL HUNGER

CENTER TO AWARD BILL EMERSON AND MICKEY LELAND

HUNGER FELLOWSHIPS.

Notwithstanding the Congressional Hunger Fellows Act of 2002

(section 4404 of Public Law 107–171; 2 U.S.C. 1161), funds appropriated for fiscal years 2003 and 2004 for the purpose of providing

the Bill Emerson and Mickey Leland Hunger Fellowships shall

be made available to the Congressional Hunger Center for the

purpose of awarding the fellowships, except that any such funds

provided in excess of $3,000,000 in fiscal year 2003 or $3,000,000

in fiscal year 2004 shall be appropriated to the Congressional

Hunger Fellows Trust Fund established by such Act.

Approved July 14, 2003.

July 14, 2003

[H.R. 2474]
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                                        
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         1819000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2795000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       147802000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                26536000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               132160000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           774000
<BONDS>                                       39798000
<COMMON>                                     124126000       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (34160000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 132160000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              24432000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              15635000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4867000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                3930000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            3930000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                6341000<F2>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  10271000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.91
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.91
<FN>
<F1>This item consists of Real Estate Investments Owned
<F2>This item consists of Gains on Sales of Properties
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 54596.

#### Van Gelder-Fanto Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 147040-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
No. 54005.

#### La Borteaux Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 149567-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protest was dismissed.
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

ID

Simple or

 Special Name Type Description Rule

132 SPECIAL

TAS Restrictions for USSGL Accounts 480110 and 490110 Compound

USSGL accounts 480110 and 490110 are restricted to specific TAS. Fail 

Data Validations - Summary

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Bulletin No. 2024-03 DRAFT VII VSR - 1
## UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII 901 NORTH 5TH STREET KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101

July 21, 2010 Dear Owner/Resident: RUBIN WILLIAMS OMAHA, NE 68111 2557 FOWLER AVE

RE: 2557 FOWLER AV SAID: 671

A Lead Based Paint (LBP) assessment was re cently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Omaha Lead S uperfund Site investigation. The purpose of this as sessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of lead based paint is present on the exterior surface of structures, there deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) exist that might increase leadconcentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3 045.

Enclosure Sincerely,

Robert Feild Project Coordinator Superfund Division As requested, enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 2557 FOWLER AV along with a LBP Fact Sheet. The EPA is currently developing paint stabilizationeligibility criteria and at this time can not identify which homes will ultimately be eligible for EPA-funded paint stabilization. At present, paint stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LPB problems, particularly where children under the age of 7 res ide. The EPA stresses the importance of maintaining painted surfaces where any amount of LBP is present. The LB P Fact Sheet provides information pertaining to the EPA's Exterior LBP Response Program. Once the eligibilitycriterion is finalized (and if your property qualifies) a repres entative from EPA or the Omaha Lead Hazard Control Program (LHCP) will contact you to arrange for paint stabilization at your property. Exposure to lead contamination can advers ely affect the development and behavior of young children. If you have children less than seven years of age living i n your home, we strongly recommend that you contact your doctor or the Douglas County Health Department at (402) 444-7825 and arrange to have their blood tested.

Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment

### Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment LEGEND: 

### H 

# - N 

## - P 

# - 01 

# - 671 

# ( 

# I I -BYID Number 1 - Sample Number Material, P = Paint -Side of Structure N = North S = South E = East W = West 1 -Structure Type H = House G = Garage S = Shed F = Fence 

### Sample Number Samples 

### Analyzed XRF Unit: Book: 

### IB~

Date: 

### Gfl3/ud Time: jb:o 

### Staff:ntS 

# /m / 

### / I -' 

### Lead Loading StructurelFeature Substrate Color Deteriorated (Window, siding, porch, etc.) (Wood, concrete, etc.) 

### Area

Lev LBP-I I Pruaed L12112lr;lX 15 16 11 11447111 111 23ALT:

- - 

### Omaha Lead Site Site Sketch 

## LBP Assessment North Arrow I 

# I' I I Plan View 

# - Indicate number of stories and wrimeter dimensions of structure 

### I1 lndicate regions of deteriorstion and describe (Deterioration could include surfaces that are worn due to friction, checking, cracking and flaking, alligatoring, blistering and/or peeling)

4

~~ ---~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -.
No. 56376.

protests 140223-K, etc. (New York).

#### Cohen & Mann et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.