alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# Issues and Recommendations for Advancement of PRA Technology In Risk-Informed Decision Making (NUREG/CR-6813)

On this page:
        - Publication Information
        - Abstract

Download complete document
        - NUREG/CR-6813 (PDF - 3.66 MB)

## Publication Information

**Manuscript Completed:**January 2003**Date Published:**April 2003

**Prepared by:** Karl N. Fleming Technology Insights 6540 Lusk Boulevard, Suite C-102 San Diego, California 92121 

H.P. Nourbakhsh, NRC Project Manager 

**Prepared for:** Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ****Washington, DC 20555-0001

NRC Job Code B1564 

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The purpose of this report is to assess the adequacy of probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) for use in regulatory decisions and provide recommendations for its advancements. The insights and recommendations documented in this report were developed by conducting interviews, examining case studies in risk-informed regulation, and by applying experience in developing and applying PRA technology and participating in PRA peer reviews. A number of insights were developed from the review of the recent Davis-Besse vessel head degradation and previous risk-informed and deterministic safety evaluations of the Alloy 600 nozzle cracking issue. Using the author's experience in performing and reviewing several of the existing industry PRAs, a number of technical issues were identified that help defines the current state of the art in PRA technology. The results and conclusions of this report include a number of recommendations intended to resolve some of the issues that were identified and to advance the use of PRAs in risk-informed decision making.

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
| Certification      of Chief Executive Officer | Exhibit      32(a) |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| EastGroup      Properties, Inc.               |               |

|   | By:  /s/ DAVID H. HOSTER      II                                                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | DAVID      H. HOSTER II                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   | Chief      Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | February      26, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |

----
Exhibit
        23.1
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
        333-127820 and 333-146737 on Form S-8 of our report dated March 5, 2008,
        relating to the financial statements of Bio Solutions Manufacturing, Inc.,
        which
        appear in this Annual Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-KSB of Bio Solutions
        Manufacturing, Inc. for the fiscal years ended October 31, 2007 and October
        31,
        2006.
  
 /s/
        Sherb
& Co., LLP
 
 Sherb
        & Co., LLP
 New
        York,
        New York
 
 March
        7,
        2008
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1438 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial 

in the State of Missouri as the ‘‘Gateway Arch National 

Park’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1438 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gateway Arch National 

3 Park Designation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF GATEWAY ARCH NATIONAL PARK. 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Jefferson National Ex6 pansion Memorial established under the Act of May 17, 

7 1954 (16 U.S.C. 450jj et seq.), shall be known and des8 ignated as the ‘‘Gateway Arch National Park’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial shall 

12 be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Gateway Arch Na13 tional Park’’. 

Passed the Senate December 21, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1438 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the Jefferson National Expansion 

way Arch National Park’’. Memorial in the State of Missouri as the ‘‘Gate-
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

I, Dana L. Dabney, Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of
Circle Group Holdings, Inc. (the "Registrant"), certifies that to the best of my
knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the
period ended June 30, 2003 of the Registrant (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.

             /s/ Dana L. Dabney
             -----------------------
             Name: Dana L. Dabney
             Date: August 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IQ Biometrix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Walsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Michael Walsh
-----------------------------
Michael Walsh
Chief Financial Officer

November 15, 2004


                                       27
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                     Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2000-A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of December 1, 2000 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by
and between Chase USA and Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2000-A, as issuer
(the "Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January
     1, 2003 until December 31, 2003 was conducted under my supervision.

2.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fully
     performed in all material respects all its obligations, under the Pooling
     and Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no material default in
     the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as
     set forth in paragraph 3 below.

3.   None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March 2004.


                                              /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                                              ----------------------
                                              Richard J. Naeder
                                              Authorized Signatory
Amendment No. 3 to Yellow Corporation Pension Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 
 YELLOW CORPORATION PENSION PLAN 
 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2004) 
 THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by YRC Worldwide Inc. (the “Company”) this
1st day of July, 2008. 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS,
the Company maintains the Yellow Corporation Pension Plan (the “Plan”) for the benefit of the employees of the Company and its participating affiliates; 
 WHEREAS, Section 11.1 of the Plan provides that the Company, through action of its Board of Directors or Compensation Committee of its Board of Directors, may amend the Plan at any time; 
 WHEREAS, the Company has determined to amend the Plan to freeze future benefit accruals; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Company agrees that the Plan is amended, effective July 1, 2008, as set forth below: 
 1. Add the following sentence to the end of Section 3.3(b): 
 Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of determining an Active Participant’s Credited Service, no Hours of Employment on or after July 1, 2008 shall be considered. 
 2. Add the following sentence to the end of Section 4.3(c): 
 Notwithstanding the foregoing, for purposes of determining an Active Participant’s Average Final Compensation, his Base Wage shall not include any amounts earned on or after July 1, 2008. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Sponsor has caused this Agreement to be executed on the
1st day of July, 2008. 
  

			
	YRC WORLDWIDE INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Harold D. Marshall

		 	Harold D. Marshall,
		 	Vice President-Employee Benefits
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
for the period ended June 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                              By:  /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: August 10, 2007
______________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
#### Ramon GUTIERREZ, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 01-3201.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 4, 2001.

ORDER

A petition for review of an initial decision of the Merit Systems Protection *958Board having been docketed in this court, and it appearing that the petitioner has also sought review before the board, and it appearing that the initial decision of the board will not become a final decision, it is

ORDERED that the petition for review be, and it hereby is, DISMISSED, without prejudice to the subsequent filing of a petition for review after the board has again acted in the case.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

GERAWAN FARMING, INC., 

a California corporation,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY, 

a Delaware corporation,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-1264, -1290

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of California in No. 1:11-cv-01273-LJOBAM, Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JILL M. PIETRINI, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for the plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief were JAMES E. CURRY 

and MICHAEL MURPHY. 

SCOTT B. LIEBERMAN, Slater Hersey & Lieberman 

LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee. 
 

With him on the brief were MARK K. SLATER, JONATHAN P.

HERSEY, and NEIL J. COOPER. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 December 10, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We herebyconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 33-20291 and No. 33-2830 relating to the Management Incentive Compensation Plan of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. (the “Company”);Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 33-5352, No. 33-21605, No. 333-4747, and No. 333-23603 relating to the 1986 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1986 United Kingdom Stock Option Plan and the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan of the Company;Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 33-10087 and No. 33-25555 relating to the Long-Term Performance Incentive Plan of the Company; Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-28029 relating to The Interpublic OutsideDirectors’ Stock Incentive Plan of the Company; Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-42675 relating to the 1997 Performance Incentive Plan of the Company; Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement on Form S-4No. 333-59254 relating to the True North Communications Inc. Stock Option Plan and the Bozell, Jacobs, Kenyon & Eckhardt, Inc. Stock Option Plan; Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-89896 relating to the 2002 PerformanceIncentive Plan of the Company; Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-115923 relating to the 2004 Performance Incentive Plan of the Company; Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 333-115924 relating to the Non-ManagementDirectors’ Stock Incentive Plan of the Company and No. 333-159544 relating to the 2009 Non-Management Director’s Stock Incentive Plan of the Company; Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-134498 relating to the 2006Performance Incentive Plan of the Company; Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-134497, relating to the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2006) of the Company; Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-159546 relating to the 2009Performance Incentive Plan of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. of our report dated February 26, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears inthis Form 10-K. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

New York, New York 

February 26, 2010
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 34-4 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 34-4 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 34-4 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 34-4 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 34-4 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 34-4 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 34-4 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 34-4 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 34-4 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 9 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION
v.
ANTHONY SPRUILL NO. 05-532
ORDER
AND NOW, this 2. of I la fic h , 2018, upon consideration of the pro se

Motion Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3582(c) (2) According to U.S.S. Guideline Amendment 794, and
782 and 591 (ECF No. 136) and the pro se Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF

No. 138), it is ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED.'

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

' Defendant’s Motion Title 18 U.S.C. Section 3582(c) (2) According to U.S.S. Guideline
Amendment 794, and 782 and 591 (ECF No. 136) is completely devoid of merit.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1.

Stipulation and Order

THE LAW OFFICES OF RICHARD K. WERNER

RICHARD K. WERNER, ESQ., SBN: 133522

601 University Avenue, Suite 255

Sacramento, California 95825

Telephone: 916.929.3162

Facsimile: 916.929.3167

Attorneys for Plaintiff

KATHLEEN SEIFERT OK/HAV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KATHLEEN SEIFERT,

Plaintiff,

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT

OF AGRICULTURE, SCOTT MILES

and DOES 1 - 25, inclusive,

Defendants.

 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. S-04-0553 DFL GGH

STIPULATION AND ORDER

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED UPON by counsel for the parties as

follows:

The current Motion for Summary Judgment set for September 28. 2005 and

related dates will be continued. Motion for Summary Judgment will be heard on November 9,

2005 at 10:00 a.m.; Pre-Trial January 13, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., and Trial March 27, 2006, at 9:00

a.m..

DATED: September 28, 2005 /s/ 

RICHARD K. WERNER

Attorney for Plaintiffs

DATED: /s/ 

DEBORA G. LUTHER

Attorney for Defendants

Case 2:04-cv-00553-DFL-GGH Document 20 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2.

Stipulation and Order

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

That the Motion for Summary Judgment and the related dates be continued as set forth 

herein and agreed to by the parties.

DATED: 09/28/2005

/s/ David F. Levi 

THE HONORABLE DAVID F. LEVI

Case 2:04-cv-00553-DFL-GGH Document 20 Filed 09/28/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust-Series A
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>
<CIK>               1051822
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust-Series A
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-2000

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-29-2000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          16,099,624

<SECURITIES>                    36,580

<RECEIVABLES>                   2,646

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                16,138,850

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  16,138,850

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           219,419

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      15,919,431

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    16,138,850

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                (2,534,043)

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,374,259

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (3,908,302)

<EPS-BASIC>                   (13.42)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

GRACE LAWRENCE 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TRANS UNION LLC 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA 

Defendant. 

C.A. NO: 02-CV-4440 

ORDER

 AND NOW, this _______ day of _________________, 200___, upon 

consideration of defendant's within Motion for Reconsideration of this Court's Order 

denying, in part, defendant's motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff's response 

thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

 1) Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED; 

 2) The Order of December 11, 2003 is VACATED to the extent that 

defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to plaintiff's claim for willful 

violation of 15 U.S.C. §1681 and an entitlement to FCRA qualified immunity was 

denied; and 

 3) Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED with respect to 

plaintiff's claims of a willful violation of the FCRA and all state law claims. 

 

 SO ORDERED, 

 _________________

 ANITA B. BRODY, U.S.D.J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 42-5 Filed 12/18/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 48451.

#### Protests 895083-G, etc., of D. & B. Import Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 10(iii) (c)


                    DESCRIPTION OF BONUS ARRANGEMENT
                    FOR EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENTS OF
                        INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY

     There is no formal document setting forth this
arrangement.  However, as set forth in the Company's 2000
Proxy Statement, subject to the approval of the Board of
Directors which approves the amount of each award, the
Compensation and Benefits Committee will approve bonus
arrangements for the Executive Vice Presidents.  These
officers may receive bonuses attributable to 2000 dependent
upon the Company's attainment of predetermined earnings per
share goals.  The amount of such bonus is discretionary and
is subject to general guidelines.  Discretionary bonuses may
be paid in the event that corporate goals are not met.