alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018063EN.01001201.xml

| 19.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/12

---

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2017 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MONT ORIGINAL Super Slims)

(Case T-292/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Revocation of the earlier EU figurative trade mark GOLD MOUNT - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 063/15)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kaane American International Tobacco Co. FZE, formerly Kaane American International Tobacco Co. Ltd (Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez and I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Global Tobacco FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hussey, Solicitor, and B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 (Case R 2492/2014-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Kaane American International Tobacco and Global Tobacco.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

1

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**Park
      City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries**


**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**





In
      connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall K. Fields,
      Principal Executive Officer of the Company and I, John Merrill, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
      to my
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and


(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





Dated:    September
      28, 2007






_____________________________________________


/s/
      Randall K. Fields


Principal
      Executive Officer, CEO








Dated:   September
      28, 2007







_____________________________________________


/s/
      John
      R, Merrill


Principal
      Financial Officer, CFO























**(REMAINDER
      OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)**














---
**Part 1, Section I: Chart of Accounts**

The Chart of Accounts provides the basic structure for the U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL). It incorporates both proprietary and budgetary accounts. The proprietary and budgetary sets of general ledger accounts are self balancing (the total debits equal total credits). It is important to note that central agency reporting requires a lower level of detail than the 6-digit USSGL account numbers provided. Therefore, the USSGL Board developed attributes containing various domain values that, when added to a basic 6-digit USSGL account, provide the appropriate level of detail needed for central agency reporting and, in effect, create new USSGL accounts. See Section IV for attribute definitions and domain values. It is this lower level of detail, the basic 6-digit USSGL account plus applicable attribute domain values, that agencies must capture at the transaction level to (1) comply with USSGL policy contained herein, and (2) achieve the desired result for proper reporting.

The basic 6-digit USSGL accounts are classified as follows:

**100000 Assets**

**200000 Liabilities**

**300000 Net Position**

**400000 Budgetary**

**500000 Revenue and Other Financing Sources 600000 Expenses**

**700000 Gains/Losses/Miscellaneous Items**

**800000 Memorandum**

Agencies may expand this numbering system to as many digits as necessary to accommodate agency- specific requirements. However, subsidiary accounts must summarize or “roll up” to the 6-digit USSGL accounts plus any related attributes as defined herein.

In February 1999, the USSGL Board voted to delete summary accounts. However, agencies may summarize accounts as they find useful. Section headings replace many of the deleted summary accounts to maintain the integrity of the account structure.

Page 1 of 1

 (Part 1SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection I) (U.S. Standard General LedgerChart of Accounts) (Account Number) (Normal Balance) (Title)

 (Bulletin No. 2017-06) (I CA - 19) (June 2017)

# image1.png
Post Office Box 1569 

Carlsbad, NM8822L-1569 

(575)887-1191 

1-800-658-2713 

www. c ity of carlsbadnm. com 

March 24, 2011 

Oc?r- OST- 2002 -12-0^2-

DALE JANWAY 

MAYOU 

M'T F^ Lp I 1 

HARRY BURGESS 

CITY Ai).\ii\'isrnATOR 

Mr. Brian Swanson 

AlCP 

US Department of Transportation 

RE: Cavern City Air Terminal, Carlsbad, NM 

Dear Mr. Swanson: 

The City of Carlsbad recommends the approval of our Essential Air Service (EAS) with New Mexico 

Air. New Mexico Airlines continues to provide satisfactory services to the citizens of Carlsbad. 

Please feel free to contact City Administrator, Harry Burgess, at 575-887-1191. should you have any 

questions. 

Sincerely, 

Daie janway 

Mayor 

DJ:jab 

cc: George West, Airport Manager 

Enclosures 

COUNCILORS 

Wanll 

NICK G. SALCIDO 

PAUL C. AGUILAR 

Ward 2 

SANDRA K. IfUMLEY 

J.R. DOPORTO 

Ward 3 

WESLEY A. CARTER 

JUDl WATERS 

Vfud4 

JANELL E. WHITLOCK 

DICK DOSS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSEPH RICE : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART : NO. 05-2584

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 14th day of July, 2006, after independent consideration of the

parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, plaintiff’s reply brief, and review of the

Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and objections thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;

3. The Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and

4. Judgment is entered in favor of defendant, Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration, and against plaintiff, Joseph Rice.

BY THE COURT:

Berle M. Schiller, J.

Case 2:05-cv-02584-BMS Document 14 Filed 07/14/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Andre HOSKINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION; et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-35163.

D.C. No. CV-98-1345-ALA.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*541Submitted June 11, 2001.*

Decided June 21, 2001.

Before O’SCANNLAIN, SILVERMAN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.

*

 The panel unanimously Ends this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, Hoskins' request for oral argument is denied.

MEMORANDUM **

Andre Hoskins appeals pro se the district court’s judgment dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) his action bringing claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the dismissal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) for failure to state a claim, *Barren v. Harrington,*152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir.1998) (order), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Hoskins’ FTCA claim against the Federal Communications Commission because the FTCA provides for suits against the United States, and not individual agencies, for personal injuries arising out of the negligence of federal employees. *See*28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2679(a); *Allen v. Veterans Admin.,*749 F.2d 1386, 1388 (9th Cir.1984).

The district court properly dismissed Hoskins’ section 1983 claims against the remaining defendants because private parties are not generally acting under color of state law, and conclusory allegations, unsupported by fact, are insufficient to state a claim under the Civil Rights Act. *See Price v. Hawaii,*939 F.2d 702, 707-708 (9th Cir.1991).

AFFIRMED.

**

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, 

COLEMAN & GOGGIN 

BY: Joseph J. Santarone, Jr., Esquire Electronically Filed 

ID# 45723 

Suite 1002, One Montgomery Plaza 

Norristown, PA 19401 

(610) 292-4444 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

CANDACE RAY : Civil Action No: 02-4382 

 : 

v. : 

 : 

ABINGTON TOWNSHIP, CHIEF OF POLICE : 

WILLIAM KELLY, POLICE OFFICER NISBET, : 

POLICE OFFICER J. KING, POLICE OFFICER : 

BRUCE HASLAM, OFFICER MATZ, OFFICER : 

RAWTZ, OFFICER SCHOLL, OFFICER MANN : 

AND ABINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND : 

MARK SHNEA : 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Joseph J. Santarone, Jr., Esquire, do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Notice of Videotape 

Trial Deposition of Dr. Timothy J. Michals, was served upon all parties by first class mail on October 26, 2004 

at the following addressees and via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested and Hand Delivery upon Plaintiff, 

Candace Ray at the following address: 

Candace Ray David R. Zaslow, Esquire 

1350 High Avenue WHITE AND WILLIAMS 

Roslyn, PA 19001 1500 Lancaster Avenue 

 Paoli, PA 19301-1500 

Case 2:02-cv-04382-RB Document 39 Filed 10/26/2004 Page 1 of 2
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, 

 COLEMAN & GOGGIN 

 _s/JS1015____ 

JOSEPH J. SANTARONE, JR., ESQUIRE 

Attorney for Defendant 

Suite 1002, One Montgomery Plaza 

Norristown, PA 19401 

610-292-4444 (Phone) 

610-292-0410 (Fax) 

jsantarone@mdwcg.com 

PA45723 

DATE: October 26, 2004

Case 2:02-cv-04382-RB Document 39 Filed 10/26/2004 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 10      Filed 03/31/2004     Page 1 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 10      Filed 03/31/2004     Page 2 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 10      Filed 03/31/2004     Page 3 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 10      Filed 03/31/2004     Page 4 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 10      Filed 03/31/2004     Page 5 of 5
Exhibit (21)LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES (States of Formation)








100% Owned Subsidiaries of EastGroup Properties, Inc. (Maryland)





EastGroup Properties General Partners, Inc. (Delaware)


EastGroup Properties Holdings, Inc. (Delaware)


EastGroup TRS, Inc. (Delaware)





Partnerships and LLC’s with Partners and Members Indented:





EastGroup Properties, LP (Delaware)


99% EastGroup Properties Holdings, Inc.


1% EastGroup Properties General Partners, Inc.


EastGroup Property Services, LLC (Delaware)


100% EastGroup Properties, LP


EastGroup Property Services of Florida, LLC (Delaware)


100% EastGroup Property Services, LLC


EastGroup Jacksonville, LLC (Delaware)


100% EastGroup Properties, LP


EastGroup Kearn Creek, LLC (Delaware)


100% EastGroup Properties, LP


55 Castilian, LLC (Delaware)


80% EastGroup Properties, LP


20% BDC Castilian, LLC


Sample I-95 Associates (Florida)


99% EastGroup Properties, LP


1% EastGroup Properties General Partners, Inc.


University Business Center Associates (California)


80% Profit interest EastGroup Properties, LP


49% Capital interest EastGroup Properties, LP


31% Capital interest EastGroup Properties, Inc.


20% JCB Limited





75
STATE STREET





Mr. Michael Umana
Chief Financial Officer
Saucony, Inc.
13 Centennial Drive
Peabody, MA 01960

December 26, 2001

Re:      Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement dated August 31, 1998 by and
         between State Street Bank and Trust Company, a Massachusetts trust
         company, as lender and Saucony, Inc. ("Saucony"), as borrower (the
         "Credit Agreement").

Dear Michael:

         This letter is to confirm that the Termination Date (as defined in
Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement) shall be extended through January 31, 2002.

         Saucony agree that the Credit Agreement and all documents executed in
connection therewith or pursuant thereto remain in full force and effect after
giving effect to this letter amendment to Credit Agreement.

         Please confirm that the foregoing correctly sets forth our agreement by
signing and returning the duplicate copy of this letter agreement enclosed
herewith.

Very truly yours,

STATE STREET BANK AND TRUST COMPANY


BY: /s/ Jacqueline Kuss
Title: Vice President


BORROWER:

SAUCONY, INC.


By:  /s/ Michael Umana
Title:  Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, ThaddeusDupper, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the QuarterlyReport of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of EvolvingSystems, Inc.
| /s/ THADDEUS DUPPER                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Thaddeus Dupper                       |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 8, 2007                        |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “ExchangeAct”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by referenceinto any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the ExchangeAct, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference.

----
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1 D 2 0 2 4

- 0 207

_____________________________ K.A., father of A.C.S., R.D.E., K.S.A., A Minor Child

,
Appellant,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF C HILDREN AND F AMILIES ,
Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. R. Todd Harris , Judge

.

June 18, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.

D ISMISSED

. N.S.H. v. Dep’t of Child. & Fam. Servs. , 843 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 2003) (approving procedure that includes dismissal when, after counsel withdraws, the appellant fails to timely file his or her own brief in support of appeal of termination of parental rights)

.

L EWIS , N ORDBY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., co ncur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

K.A., pro se, Appellant.

Sarah J. Rumph, Children’s Legal Services

, Tallahassee

, for Appellee ; Sara Elizabeth Goldfarb, Statewide Director of Appeals, and Caitlin E. Burke, Senior Attorney, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, for Guardian ad Litem.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Thaddeus Dupper,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of EvolvingSystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30,2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ THADDEUS DUPPER                    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Thaddeus Dupper                        |   |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |
| August 4, 2009                    |   |

 

 

This certificationis furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification willnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat we specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CAROL JUROTICH :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4322

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04322-CN Document 8 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 4.10



Table of Contents



Exhibit 4.10 


[THE COCA-COLA COMPANY LETTERHEAD]


June 2, 2008 


Embotelladora Central, S.A. 

República de Guatemala 


Dear Sirs: 


In regards to the Bottler Agreement in force and effect since March 18, 2000 (“the Agreement”) entered into between you and The Coca-Cola Company (the “Company”), we inform you that a new bottler agreement is in the final stages
of discussion and approval among the parties, which we estimate will be executed towards the middle of September 2008, hereby the Agreement is temporarily extended from March 31, 2008 until:


September 30, 2008 


With the exception of said extension, all the terms and conditions of the Agreement will continue to be fully valid until the expiration of said additional term, and once the extension expires, the Bottler will no longer have the right to claim a
tacit renewal of the aforementioned Agreement.

 

		
	 	 Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ 
	 	 
	 	Authorized Representative 





Accepted by: 

EMBOTELLADORA CENTRAL, S.A. 

		
	/s/ 	 
	 	 
	Authorized Representative
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6942

In Re: ARTHUR LEE GOODEN, II,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-666-7)

Submitted: August 9, 2002 Decided: August 30, 2002

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Gooden, II, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Gooden has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus

in this court to compel the district court to expedite its

consideration of his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

The granting of a writ of mandamus is a drastic remedy to be used

in extraordinary circumstances. In re: Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826-27

(4th Cir. 1987). A petitioner must show that he has a clear right

to the relief sought, that the respondent has a clear duty to

perform the act requested by petitioner, and that there is no other

adequate remedy available. In re: First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n,

860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Gooden has failed to make the

requisite showing of extraordinary circumstances justifying

mandamus relief. Our review of the district court docket sheet

discloses that there has been no undue delay in considering

Gooden’s § 2254 petition. Accordingly, although we grant leave to

proceed in forma pauperis, we deny his petition for a writ of

mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3887 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3887

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty for 
                                rioting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 6, 2024

  Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the penalty for 
                                rioting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Stop Pro-Terrorist Riots Now Act''.

SEC. 2. RIOTS.

    Section 2101 of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding subsection 
        (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``subparagraph (A), (B), (C), or 
                (D) of this paragraph--'' and inserting ``paragraph 
                (1), (2), (3), or (4) of this subsection--'';
                    (B) by inserting ``less than one year if the 
                defendant, in carrying out an activity described in 
                this subsection, committed an act of violence or aided 
                or abetted any other person in committing an act of 
                violence, nor'' before ``more''; and
                    (C) by striking ``five'' and inserting ``ten''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), by striking ``subparagraph (A), (B), 
        (C), or (D) of paragraph (1) of subsection (a)'' and inserting 
        ``paragraph (1), (2), (3), or (4) of subsection (a)''.
                                 <all>
```