alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 1 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 2 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 3 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 4 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 5 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 6 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 7 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 8 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 9 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 10 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 11 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 12 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 13 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 14 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 15 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 16 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 17 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 18 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 19 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 20 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 21 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 22 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 23 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 24 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 25 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 110 Filed 12/21/2004 Page 26 of 26
## SERVED: April3, 2014 US DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D.C.
IN THE MATTER OF MARTINAIRE AVIATION, LLC FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED]

· (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0040
AMENDED HEARING NOTICE 

### -- 3 ;:J

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thattestimony and evidence will be heard and considered onJune 18, 10 and 20, 2014, inclusive, inthe U.S. Tax Court, Courtroom 591, Federal Building, 207 S. Houston Street, Dallas, TX 75202. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties shall vacate the courthouse on orbefore 5:00p.m. each day. The parties are advised anotherjudge has the courtroomreserved for June 16 and 17. Ifthat case carries overthis case may be delayed.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Michael L. Dworkin, Respondent's Counsel Michael L. Dworkin and Associates Law Offices 465 California Street, Suite 210 SanFrancisco, CA 94104-1808 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 James Archier, Complainant's Counsel Agency Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Southwest Region Federal AviationAdministration 2601 Meacham Blvd., Suite 6E FortWorth, TX76137 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5092 The Honorable Richard C, Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJerseyAvenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0040 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

|

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT | CIVIL ACTION

|

Plaintiff, |

|

v. | NO. 02-4421

|

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER |

OF COMMERCE, INC., et al., |

|

Defendants. |

O R D E R

AND NOW, this ______ day of March, 2004, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to

Compel Deposition of Defendant John (“Bud”) Aiken, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion

is GRANTED. The deposition of Defendant Aiken shall take place no later than April 1, 2004.

Should Defendant Aiken fail to comply and attend the deposition in accordance with this Order, he

shall face contempt sanctions. 

BY THE COURT:

_____________________________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 14 Filed 03/19/2004 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 37-3 Filed 10/29/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 37-3 Filed 10/29/2003 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 1 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 2 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 3 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 4 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 5 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 6 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 7 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 8 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 9 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 10 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 11 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 12 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 13 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 14 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 15 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 16 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 17 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 18 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 19 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 20 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 21 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 22 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 23 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 24 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 25 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 26 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 27 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 28 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 29 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 30 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 31 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 32 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 33 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 34 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 35 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 36 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 37 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 38 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 39 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 40 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 41 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 42 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 43 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 44 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 45 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 128-4 Filed 01/27/2005 Page 46 of 46
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ronald J. Kramer, Chief Executive Officer of Griffon Corporation, certify that the Form 10-K of Griffon
Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Griffon Corporation for the periods presented.

By:

/s/ RONALD J. KRAMERName: Ronald J. Kramer
Date: December 11, 2008


I,
Patrick L. Alesia, Chief Financial Officer of Griffon Corporation, certify that the Form 10-K of Griffon Corporation for the period ended September 30, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all materials respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Griffon Corporation for the periods presented.

By:

/s/ PATRICK L. ALESIAName: Patrick L. Alesia
Date: December 11, 2008


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Griffon Corporation and will be retained by Griffon Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-5114

_____________________________

CONTESSA KOPP,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

James M. Colaw, Judge.

October 1, 2019

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 

(1967), the Court directed Appellant to show cause why the appeal 

should not be dismissed as untimely. In response, Appellant 

concedes that the notice of appeal was filed more than 30 days after 

rendition of the order to be reviewed. We therefore dismiss this 

case for lack of jurisdiction. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b).

DISMISSED.

RAY, C.J., and KELSEY and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Dain Rauscher Corporation:

         We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration 
Statement No. 333-53851, Registration  Statement No. 333-03113, Registration 
Statement No. 333-20487, Registration Statement No. 33-58069, Registration 
Statement No. 33-54223, Registration Statement No. 33-54907, Registration 
Statement No. 33-59426, Registration Statement No. 33-39182, Registration 
Statement No. 33-25979, post-effective amendment No. 1 to Registration 
Statement No. 33-13068, post-effective amendment No. 2 to  Registration 
Statement  No. 33-10243, post-effective amendment No. 2 to Registration 
Statement No. 33-10242, post-effective amendment No. 4 to  Registration 
Statement No. 2-90634, post-effective amendment No. 8 to  Registration 
Statement  No. 2-61514, post-effective amendment No. 11 to Registration 
Statement No. 2-57759, post-effective amendment No. 15 to  Registration 
Statement No. 2-53289, post-effective amendment No. 16 to Registration 
Statement No. 2-51150 and Registration Statement No. 1-08186 of Dain Rauscher 
Corporation, and  subsidiaries of our report dated February 3, 1999, relating 
to the consolidated balance sheets of Dain Rauscher Corporation and 
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and the consolidated statements 
of operations, shareholders' equity and cash flows and the related financial 
statement schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended 
December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 1998 Annual 
Report on Form 10-K of Dain Rauscher Corporation.




                                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP




Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 18 , 1999

                                      52
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANTTO**

**18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian R. Ervine, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterlyperiod ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition and results of operations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ BRIAN R. ERVINE                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                     |
| Brian R. Ervine                                                          |
| Executive Vice President and Chief Financial and Administrative  Officer |
| May 16, 2005                                                        |

 

----
1

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

______________

No. 22-2134

______________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

SHAMEK HYNSON,

also known as SHY

also known as LEGEND,

Appellant

______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(No. 2-05-cr-00576-002)

U.S. District Judge: Honorable Juan R. Sanchez

______________

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

May 16, 2023

______________

Before: SHWARTZ, MONTGOMERY-REEVES, and ROTH, Circuit Judges.

______________

JUDGMENT

______________

This cause came to be considered on the record from the United States District 

Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was submitted pursuant to Third 

Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a) on May 16, 2023.

On consideration whereof, it is now hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED by this 

Court that the judgment of the District Court entered on June 3, 2022, is hereby

Case: 22-2134 Document: 36-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/01/2023
2 

AFFIRMED. All of the above in accordance with the Opinion of this Court. 

 ATTEST:

 s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit

Clerk

Dated: July 10, 2023

August 1, 2023

Case: 22-2134 Document: 36-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/01/2023

Certified as a true copy and issued in lieu

of a formal mandate on 

Teste:

Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
EXHIBIT 4.10



PLEDGED SHARE AMENDMENT

     This Pledged Share Amendment, dated as of August 27, 1997, is delivered
pursuant to Section 5 of the Pledge Agreement referred to below.  The
undersigned hereby agrees that this Pledged Share Amendment may be attached to
the Pledge Agreement dated as of May 26, 1992, between the undersigned and
Chemical Bank, as Trustee (the "Pledge Agreement"; capitalized terms defined
therein being used herein as therein defined), and that the Pledged Shares
listed on this Pledged Share Amendment shall be deemed to be part of the
Pledged Shares and shall become part of the Pledged Collateral and shall
secure all Senior Obligations as provided in the Pledge Agreement.



                         AMERICAN BANKNOTE CORPORATION


                         By:   S/ Harvey J.  Kesner
                         Name:   Harvey J.  Kesner
                         Title:  Executive Vice President & General Counsel

                                                               Percentage of
                              Stock                            All Capital
                    Class of  Certificate  Par     Number of   Stock
Stock Issuer        Stock     Number       value   Shares      Outstanding



USBC Capital Corp. Common       1          0.01       100      100%
# sec5_sbr_2018

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2018-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10DRAFT V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout July 12, 2018
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Dermisonics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce H. Haglund, the acting Chief Executive Officer
(or equivalent thereof) and acting Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent
thereof) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:


     (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                          /s/ Bruce H. Haglund
                          -------------------------------
                          Bruce H. Haglund
                          Acting Chief Executive Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                          Acting Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                          January 17, 2006
----

Action brought on 24 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-351/06)

(2006/C 249/12)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and I. Kaufmann-Bühler, acting as Agents)

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive expired on 31 July 2005.

----

(1)OJ 2003 L 152, p. 16

----
May 14, 1965

Reap. Dec. 10990.

#### Tupman Thurlow *v.*United States,

Reappraisement abandoned April 23, 1965.

REHEARING MOTION GRANTED

Motion by plaintiff.
EXHIBIT 11
<TABLE>

              INTER-REGIONAL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
              COMPUTATION OF NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
          (Amounts in thousands, except per share data)

<CAPTION>
                                      Year ended December 31,
                                   ----------------------------
                                     1995      1994      1993
                                   ----------------------------
<S>                                <C>        <C>        <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
 Net earnings                      $35,873    $25,453    $47,649
                                   =======    =======    =======

 Average number of common and
  common equivalent shares outstanding:

   Average common shares
    outstanding                     12,115     12,155     12,170
   Diluted effect of stock
    options                            431        387        438
                                   -------    -------    -------
                                    12,546     12,542     12,608
                                   =======    =======    =======
Primary earnings per share           $2.86      $2.03      $3.78
                                   =======    =======    =======
EARNINGS PER SHARE ASSUMING
 FULL DILUTION:
 Net earnings                      $35,873    $25,453    $47,649
                                   =======    =======    =======

Average number of common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding:

 Average common shares
  outstanding                       12,115     12,155     12,170

 Dilutive effect of stock options      630        387        531
                                   -------    -------    -------
                                    12,745     12,542     12,701
                                   =======    =======    =======

Fully diluted earnings per share     $2.81      $2.03      $3.75
                                   =======    =======    =======
</TABLE>
Case 2:05-cv-03599-MMB Document 8-1 Filed 11/17/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-03599-MMB Document 8-1 Filed 11/17/05 Page 2 of 2
1. Plaintiff has failed to furnish a certified inmate account

statement for the six-month period prior to the filing of this

complaint, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

2. Because plaintiff's claims arose at SCI-Retreat, which is

located in the Middle District of Pennsylvania, and because it

does not appear that any defendant in this civil action resides

in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, plaintiff's complaint

may not be brought in the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania. 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FRANCIS MILLET : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

TROY RICE, et al. : NO. 05-4743

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of September, 2005, having

considered plaintiff's civil rights complaint and incomplete

motion to proceed in forma pauperis,

1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is

DENIED without prejudice;

(2) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), plaintiff may not

bring this civil action in this Court;2

(2) Plaintiff may reassert this civil action in the

United States District Court for the Middle District of

Pennsylvania, where venue appears to be properly laid according

to the facts alleged in this complaint; 
(3) The Clerk of Court shall retain the original

records filed in this case and forward copies of these records to

the plaintiff with this order; and

(4) The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case 

statistically. 

BY THE COURT:

/S/ ROBERT F. KELLY, J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

___________________________________

JOHN MILLER, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner : 

v. :

:

JEFFREY BEARD, et al, : NO. 05-5285

 Respondents

___________________________________

NOTICE OF APPEAL

COMES NOW, John Miller, Petitioner in the above entitled matter pursuant

to 28 United States Code § 2254, by his attorney, Burton A. Rose, Esquire, and

hereby gives Notice of an Appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the

Third Circuit from the Order and Memorandum of the Honorable Bruce Kauffman,

Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania,

filed January 30, 2007, a true and correct copy which is annexed hereto, denying

and dismissing the Petitioner s Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus and also

denying the issuance of a Certificate of Appealability.

Respectfully submitted,

__________________________

BURTON A. ROSE

Attorney for John Miller

Signature Validation Code: BAR 2021

1731 Spring Garden Street

Philadelphia, Pa 19106-3519

(215) 564-5550 

 

Case 2:05-cv-05285-BWK Document 24 Filed 02/16/07 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

___________________________________

JOHN MILLER, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner : 

v. :

:

JEFFREY BEARD, et al, : NO. 05-5285

 Respondents

___________________________________

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

COMES NOW, Burton A. Rose, Attorney for John Miller, in the above

captioned matter, and hereby respectfully certifies that a true and correct copy of

the attached Notice of Appeal for Defendant has been forwarded by First Class

Mail to: 

Honorable Bruce W. Kauffman John W. Goldsborough, Esquire

United States District Judge Assistant District Attorney

U. S. Courthouse, Suite 5613 Federal Litigation Unit

610 Market Street, Room Three South Penn Square

Philadelphia, PA 19106 Philadelphia, PA 19107

Respectfully submitted,

DATED: February 16, 2007 _______________________________

BURTON A. ROSE 

Attorney for John Miller

Signature Validation Code: BAR 2021

Case 2:05-cv-05285-BWK Document 24 Filed 02/16/07 Page 2 of 2
No. 46079.

#### Protests 32214-K, etc., of Julius Wile Sons & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of Abstract 43068 the protests were sustained as to certain items.