alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUMMARY OF INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT                                 EXHIBIT 4.7
FOR DIRECTORS AND SENIOR OFFICERS


     We granted an indemnification agreement to our directors and senior
officers, which was approved by our General Meeting on August 8, 2002. Pursuant
to the agreement, we undertook to indemnify our directors and senior officers
for a monetary obligation imposed on them in favor of a third party pursuant to
a judgment (including a judgment by way of settlement or by an arbitrator's
decision which was approved by a court) and for reasonable litigation expenses
(including lawyers' fees), imposed upon them in consequence of an act (defined
as including omissions and decisions) performed or to be performed by virtue of
their being directors or senior officers in the Bank or by virtue of any office
or function they fulfilled and/or will fulfill according to our request or in
our name within any company in which we hold and/or will hold shares and any
other entity and any business venture in which we invested and/or will invest,
on condition however that such activities are related to at least one of the
types of events detailed in the indemnity agreement, which include, among
others, the following events: offering of securities, implementing voting rights
and rights to appoint directors in a company in which we hold and/or will hold
shares and/or in another entity and/or in a business venture in which we
invested and/or will invest, realization of collateral granted to us, approval
of credit and other acts within the framework of permitted activities for banks
pursuant to the Banking Law (Licensing) 1981-5741, holding of assets in trust,
granting of underwriter's undertaking, a transaction of our concerning any
assets for our account, giving any report or notice pursuant to the law, receipt
of licenses and permits, events related to employer-employee relations and the
failure to perform one or more of the above matters.

     The general and cumulative amount of indemnification that could be paid
pursuant to the above agreement shall not exceed 25% of our equity according to
our financial statements as of March 31, 2002, which stood at NIS 640,300,000,
meaning shall not exceed NIS 160,075,000, this amount being linked to the
Consumer Price Index published for the month of March 2002. The indemnification
pursuant to the indemnification agreement is subject to the provisions of the
Companies Law and to the various conditions detailed in the indemnification
agreement.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VI&"Arial,Regular"I

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold"VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"December 2021
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Ronald J. Kramer, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Griffon Corporation;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))
for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
November 24, 2009

/s/ RONALD J. KRAMERRonald J. Kramer Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)


---



QuickLinks
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STEVE AXELROTH, )

 ) Civil Action

Plaintiff ) No. 02-CV-04418

 )

vs. )

 )

CINDY LONESS CARPENTRY; )

JOHN LONESS; )

CINDY LONESS; and )

BERN TOWNSHIP; )

 )

Defendants )

ORDER

NOW, this 26th day of September, 2003, it appearing by

agreement of counsel that the issues between plaintiff Steve

Axelroth and defendant Cindy Loness Carpentry, John Loness, Cindy

Loness, and Bern Township have been settled, and upon Order of the

court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Rules of

Civil Procedure for the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania effective July 1, 1995,

IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice,

without costs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) the 

within dismissal Order “may be vacated, modified, or stricken

from the record, for cause shown, upon the application of any party

served within ninety (90) days of the entry of” the within Order.

BY THE COURT:

 

James Knoll Gardner

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04418-JKG Document 32 Filed 09/29/2003 Page 1 of 1
1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

7 

8 

9 

10 

11 

12 

13 

14 

15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

BENITO JULIAN LUNA, 

Petitioner, 

v. 

SCOTT KERNAN, 

Respondent. 

No. 2:04-cv-0627 MCE GGH P 

ORDER 

 Petitioner is a state prisoner represented by counsel, proceeding with an application for a 

writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 22, 2015, this court issued 

findings and recommendations which contained a clerical error. 

 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 

1. The findings and recommendations issued December 22, 2015 are vacated. 

2. Replacement findings and recommendations will be issued concurrently with this 

order. 

Dated: December 23, 2015 

 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows 

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

GGH:076/Luna0627.vacf&r 

Case 2:04-cv-00627-MCE-GGH Document 71 Filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 1
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A2 24 0 . DERUSHA v . BURROUGHS et a l.

On Ap ri l 24 , 2 0 1 9 , we g ran t ed Dav i d Deru sh a’ s ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret i o n ary

a p p e al i n t h i s m at t er. A rev i ew o f t h e co m p l et e reco rd , h o w ev er, s h o w s t h at t h e d i s cret i o n ary ap pl icat i o n w a s i m pro v i d en t l y g ran t ed

. Acco rd i ng l y , w e h ereb y DISM ISS t h i s ap p eal

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## November 14, 2019

11/14/2019
# sec5_sbr_2019

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2020-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2019
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6990

FRANCISCO CURBELO, a/k/a Angel HerreraPeralta,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AARON E. MICHEL,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior

District Judge. (CA-05-235-3-03)

Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 1, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Francisco Curbelo, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Francisco Curbelo appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Curbelo v. Michel, No.

CA-05-235-3-03 (W.D.N.C. June 16, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Create a Check Capture Administrator Offline Logon Profile

To create a Check Capture Administrator (CCA) Offline logon profile, complete the following 

steps:

1. Log into Over the Counter Channel Application (OTCnet) Online from the workstation in 

which you will be using the OTCnet Offline application. 

2. From the Administration tab, select Manage Users>Create Local Bridge and User 

Profile. The Create Local Bridge and User Profile page appears.

3. Under Application, choose your OTCnet Offline version.

The first two radio buttons on this page, Online Local Bridge version XXX or newer 

and Online Local Bridge version XXX or older are for OTCnet Online users.

4. Enter your Offline Password and Confirm Offline Password.

• If you forget your Offline password and the OTCnet Offline server is not available, 

you must log in to OTCnet Online from your OTCnet Offline workstation and create a 

new CCA Offline logon profile. You must be logged into your OTCnet workstation as 

a CCA to create your CCA Offline logon profile again.

• If you have an existing CCA account from an older version of OTCnet Offline 

installed, it is recommended that you set your CCA’s Offline logon profile password 

to the same password used for logging in to the Offline application. 

5. Click Submit.

• Click Submit, the system generates the credential file based on the application 

version selected. 

• Click Clear to reset the password fields.

• Click Cancel to return to the OTCnet Home Page.

6. A Do you want to open or save [file name].ini? dialog box appears. Click the Save dropdown arrow and select Save as.

Application Tip

Application Tips

Additional Buttons
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

• Save the Offline logon profile credential file with its generated file name, do not

rename the file as the file name must remain the same.

• Store the Offline logon profile credential file in the OTCnet Offline folder on the 

terminal.

• If the file name is changed, or if the file is saved in the wrong folder location, the 

OTCnet application will not run.

• Click Open and the opens in the Microsoft Notepad application. 

• Click Cancel and the Do you want to open or save dialog box closes, and you 

remain on the Create Local Bridge and User Profile page.

7. The Save dialog box appears. To store the Offline logon profile credential file in the Offline 

folder on the terminal:

o Click Local Disk (C:)

o Double-click the OTCnetOffline folder

o Double-click the data folder 

o Double-click the ini folder

8. Click Save as shown in Figure 1. The Offline logon profile credential file is saved in the 

appropriate folder on the terminal (C:\OTCnetOffline\data\ini\[file name].ini).

Figure 1. Save Credential File

Additional Buttons
# sec5_custodialact_2020

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2019-14	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCA - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10August 2019
EXHIBIT 23.1




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
                    -------------------------------
                 
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
registration statements and related prospectuses filed by
Mallinckrodt Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933 of our report
dated August 12, 1998, except for the restatement related to
purchased research and development referred to in Note 2, to which
the date is January 26, 1999, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Mallinckrodt Inc. included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A No. 1 for the year ended June 30, 1998:


                           Commission File No.
                           -------------------   
                  

                         Form S-8, No.   2-65727
                         Form S-8, No.   2-80553
                         Form S-8, No.   2-90910
                         Form S-8, No.   2-94151
                         Form S-8, No.  33-10381
                         Form S-8, No.  33-32109
                         Form S-8, No.  33-40246
                         Form S-3, No.  33-43925
                         Form S-8, No. 333-34489
                         Form S-8, No. 333-38291
                         Form S-8, No. 333-38293
                         Form S-3, No. 333-42325  
            


/S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
----------------------
Ernst & Young LLP



St. Louis, Missouri
February 12, 1999
Exhibit 10.26
                            FIRST AMENDMENT
                                 TO THE
                           FEE DEFERRAL PLAN
                      FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS OF
                   INTERNATIONAL MULTIFOODS CORPORATION
               (Amended and Restated as of September 17, 1993)


     Section 4.4 of the Fee Deferral Plan for Non-Employee Directors of 
International Multifoods Corporation (Amended and Restated as of 
September 17, 1993) is amended effective January 1, 1997, to read as 
follows:


4.4     The Account Balance of each Participant shall be credited as of 
the last day of each calendar quarter with interest at a rate equal to 
one-fourth of the annual rate reported for such date (or the next 
preceding business day) in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release as 
the yield on U.S. Treasury Bills with a constant maturity of 10 years.  
Such interest shall be credited based on the Account Balance as of the 
first day of the calendar quarter, reduced by any withdrawals or 
distributions made from the Account during the calendar quarter.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2025 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2024-03	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 2/15/24
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

TYRAIL RAHEEM KENDRICK,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D2022-0970

August 16, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Samantha L. 

Ward, Judge.

Rachael E. Reese and Olivia M. Goodman of O'Brien Hatfield Reese, P.A., 

Tampa, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and J. Wade Stidham, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, LaROSE, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 85

Dockets.Justia.com
EXHIBIT 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

Each person whose signature appears below does hereby make,
constitute and appoint DONA D. YOUNG, PETER A. HOFMANN, TRACY L. RICH and JOHN H. BEERS, and each of them, with full power to act as his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, in his or her name, place and stead to execute on his or
her behalf, as a director of The Phoenix Companies, Inc. (the Company), an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Annual Report), and any and all amendments or supplements to the Annual
Report, and to file the same with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) pursuant to the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (the Act), and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, and any and all other instruments which any of said attorneys-in-fact and agents deem necessary or advisable to enable the Company to comply with the Act, the rules, regulations and
requirements of the SEC in respect thereof, giving and granting to each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing whatsoever necessary or appropriate to be done in and about the
premises as fully to all intents as he or she might or could do in person, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, hereby gratifiying and confirming all that his or her said attorneys-in-fact and agents or substitutes may or shall
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof.

IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereunto subscribed this power of attorney this 23rdday of January, 2008.



|                       |  |  |  |                          
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|/s/ Sal H. Alfiero     |  |  |  | /s/ Gordon J. Davis      
|Sal H. Alfiero         |  |  |  | Gordon J. Davis          
|                       |  | 
|/s/ Martin N. Baily    |  |  |  | /s/ John H. Forsgren, Jr.
|Martin N. Baily        |  |  |  | John H. Forsgren, Jr.    
|                       |  | 
|/s/ Jean S. Blackwell  |  |  |  | /s/ Ann Maynard Gray     
|Jean S. Blackwell      |  |  |  | Ann Maynard Gray         
|                       |  | 
|/s/ Peter C. Browning  |  |  |  | /s/ John E. Haire        
|Peter C. Browning      |  |  |  | John E. Haire            
|                       |  | 
|/s/ Arthur P. Byrne    |  |  |  | /s/ Jerry J. Jasinowski  
|Arthur P. Byrne        |  |  |  | Jerry J. Jasinowski      
|                       |  | 
|/s/ Sanford Cloud, Jr. |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas S. Johnson    
|Sanford Cloud, Jr.     |  |  |  | Thomas S. Johnson
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Sandra Cortez :

 : CIVIL ACTION

v. :

 : NO. 05-5684

Trans Union, LLC :

MEMORANDUM

Fair Credit Reporting Act case. A jury trial was held and a

verdict rendered in favor of the Plaintiff and against the

Defendant, assessing $50,000 in actual damages, and $750,000.00

in punitive damages.

On September 13, 2007, I entered an order granting the

Defendant’s motion for a new trial with respect to damages,

unless the Plaintiff accepted a remittitur limiting the award to

$50,000 compensatory damages and $100,000 punitive damages, for a

total award of $150,000. On October 12, 2007 the Plaintiff filed

a notice of appeal of this order, as well as a conditional

acceptance of the remittitur. 

On February 14, 2008, the Third Circuit dismissed the

Plaintiff’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction, finding that an

appealable final order had not been entered. The Defendant then

moved for final judgment. Because the Plaintiff accepted the

remittitur, I will grant the Defendant’s motion and enter

judgment. An order will enter. 

Case 2:05-cv-05684-JF Document 77 Filed 05/01/08 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS AND CASH FLOWS AND
ACCOMPANYING NOTES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                           9,118
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  173,863
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,518
<INVENTORY>                                    305,682
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               549,034
<PP&E>                                         368,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 148,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 890,178
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          350,352
<BONDS>                                        178,001
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,184
<OTHER-SE>                                     305,723
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   890,178
<SALES>                                      1,973,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,973,202
<CGS>                                        1,813,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,813,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    94
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,111
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,317
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,367
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,950
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,950
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.86
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 1 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 2 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 3 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 4 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 5 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 6 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 7 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 8 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 9 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 10 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 11 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 12 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 13 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 14 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 15 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 16 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 17 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 18 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 19 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 20 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 21 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 22 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 23 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 24 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 25 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 26 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 27 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 28 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 29 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 30 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 31 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 32 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 33 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 34 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 35 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 36 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 37 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 135 Filed 02/08/2005 Page 38 of 38