alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Ernest J. Mrozek, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of The ServiceMaster
Company;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Date:   November 9, 2004

                                /S/ ERNEST J. MROZEK
                                ---------------------
                                Ernest J. Mrozek
                                President and Chief Financial Officer




                                       28
<PAGE>
----

----

I Meddelanden

Rådet

----

Information om förlängning av 1995 års konvention om handel med spannmål

(2006/C 160/01)

Vid sitt 21:a möte (i London den 14 juni 2005) beslutade Internationella spannmålsrådet att i enlighet med bestämmelserna i 1995 års konvention om handel med spannmål (1) förlänga konventionen med ytterligare två år till och med den 30 juni 2007.

----

(1)EGT L 21, 27.1.1996, s. 47.

----

Kommissionen

----

Eurons växelkurs (1)

10 juli 2006

(2006/C 160/02)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Källa: Referensväxelkurs offentliggjord av Europeiska centralbanken.

----

----

Offentliggörande av medlemsstaters beslut att bevilja eller återkalla trafiktillstånd i enlighet med artikel 13.4 i rådets förordning nr 2407/92 om tillståndsgivning för flygbolag (1) (2)

(2006/C 160/03)

(Text med EES anknytning)

ÖSTERRIKE

Beviljade trafiktillstånd

Kategori A:   Trafiktillstånd utan de begränsningar som anges i artikel 5.7 a i förordning nr 2407/92

Återkallade tillstånd

Kategori A:   Trafiktillstånd utan de begränsningar som anges i artikel 5.7 a i förordning nr 2407/92

Kategori B:   Trafiktillstånd som omfattar de begränsningar som anges i artikel 5.7 a i förordning nr 2407/92

----

(1)EGT L 240, 24.8.1992, s. 1.

(2)  Meddelats Europeiska kommissionen innan 31.8.2005

----

----

Offentliggörande av medlemsstaters beslut att bevilja eller återkalla trafiktillstånd i enlighet med artikel 13.4 i rådets förordning nr 2407/92 om tillståndsgivning för flygbolag (1) (2)

(2006/C 160/04)

(Text med EES anknytning)

DANMARK

Beviljade trafiktillstånd

Kategori B:   Trafiktillstånd som omfattar de begränsningar som anges i artikel 5.7.a i rådets förordning nr 2407/92

----

(1)EGT L 240, 24.8.1992, s. 1

(2)  Meddelats Europeiska kommissionen innan 31.8.2005

----

----

Förhandsanmälan av en koncentration

(Ärende COMP/M.4244 – Ravago/Muehlstein)

Ärendet kan komma att handläggas enligt ett förenklat förfarande

(2006/C 160/05)

(Text av betydelse för EES)

----

(1)EUT L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

(2)EUT C 56, 5.3.2005, s. 32.

----

----

Förteckning över organ och laboratorier som har utsetts av tredje land för att utfärda de dokument som skall åtfölja varje försändelse av vin som förs in i gemenskapen

(Artikel 29 i kommissionens förordning (EG) nr 883/2001)

(2006/C 160/06)

(Denna förteckning upphäver och ersätter den förteckning som offentliggjordes i Europeiska gemenskapernas officiella tidning C 336 av den 31 december 2005)

----
**GAO-03-530**                      Published: May 09, 2003. Publicly Released: Jun 05, 2003.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

More than 28 million children receive meals daily through the federal school meal programs. Providing meals that are safe is especially important because young children have a higher risk of complications from some foodborne illnesses. GAO examined (1) the frequency and causes of reported foodborne illness outbreaks associated with the federal school meal programs and (2) the practices that federal, state, and local governments as well as other food providers find useful for safeguarding meals.

## Recommendations

## Recommendations for Executive Action

## Full Report

Highlights

Full Report (69 pages)

Accessible Text 

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Agriculture and Food

Food safetyChildrenContaminated foodsDisease controlEpidemicsFood and drug legislationFood facilitiesFood inspectionFood programs for childrenFood servicesSchoolsStrategic planning
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION



The undersigned certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, that:


(1)The accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30,
2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: December 6,
2004 |  |  |  | /s/ William P.
MurnanePresident and Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|                      
|Date: December 6,
2004 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas
PaulsonChief Financial Officer                  

50

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7898

LARRY DARNELL SPEARS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (1:04-cv-01198-TSE-LO)

Submitted: January 3, 2007 Decided: January 12, 2007

Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Darnell Spears, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Larry Darnell Spears seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his request to reopen for consideration his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the

district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive

procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable.

Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v.

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-

84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Spears has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny Spears’ request for a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# sec6_rbalsh_2023

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI BS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10June 2022
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6431

OLANDIO RAY WORKMAN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER , Respondent

- Appellee,
and STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; SCOTTY BODIFORD; JOHN VANDERMOSTEN, Respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 6:17

- cv
- 03046

- RBH )

Submitted : October 23, 2018 Decided: October 25, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Olandio Ray Workman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Olandio Ray Workman , a state pretrial detainee , seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief without prejudice on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court
denies relief o n the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Coc krell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a

cons titutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Workman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argu ment because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OPTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS,

a California corporation,

NO. CIV. S-04-482 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

MARK FUKUHARA, an individual;

DOUGLAS BURLAND, an individual;

MICHAEL GERKOVICH, an individual;

STEVEN LEACH, an individual;

EDMUND PETERSON, an individual;

DAN SALOMON, an individual; JOE

SILVA, an individual; DALE BRODSKY,

an individual; EYEPICTURES, INC., a

Missouri corporation; JUSTICE

OPTHALMICS, INC., a Tennessee

corporation; ZETA DEVELOPMENT LABS,

INC., a Tennessee corporation; and

JOHNNY JUSTICE, JR., an individual,

Defendants.

 /

ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION

In light of the settlement entered onto the record before the

Honorable Dale A. Drozd, the court now orders that the

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 217 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

dispositional documents disposing of the case be filed no later

than twenty (20) days from the effective date of this order.

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby

VACATED.

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

DATED: March 28, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 217 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6874

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JOSEPH IRVEN POWELL, JR., a/k/a Jody Powell,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cr-00079-FL-1; 5:16-cv-00956-FL)

Submitted: November 21, 2017 Decided: November 27, 2017

Before WYNN and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph Irven Powell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, Donald Russell 

Pender, Stephen Aubrey West, Seth Morgan Wood, Assistant United States Attorneys, 

Jennifer E. Wells, Special Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Irven Powell, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a 

constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Powell has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Powell’s motion for a certificate of 

appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
# sec5_balsht_2019

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V BS - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2018
Part 2, Section V: USSGL Crosswalks to Standard

External Reports

This section includes crosswalks for use in fiscal 2018 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map USSGL

accounts to external reports in accordance with current reporting guidance from the Office of Management

and Budget (OMB), the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB), and the Bureau of the

Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service).

Each report crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or

column on the reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This

subsidiary information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional

information on attributes.

All crosswalks require pre-closing USSGL account balances.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by

OMB and Fiscal Service: 

Section V Page Number

Balance Sheet (BS) V BS - 1

Statement of Net Cost (SNC) V SNC - 1

Statement of Changes in Net Position (SCNP) V SCNP - 1

Statement of Custodial Activity (SCA) V SCA - 1

Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) V SBR - 1

SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and

Budgetary Resources and Budget Program and Financing

Schedule

V SF 133/Sch P - 1 

 

Page 1 of 1
Bulletin No. 2020-10

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Changes to U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury Financial Manual (TFM)

Supplement

1. Purpose—This bulletin notifies agencies that Part 2 of the USSGL has been revised for Fiscal Year

(FY) 2020.

2. Summary of Changes—The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL.

3. Changes by Part/Section/File

Part 2—FY 2020 Reporting changes to files include Sections I, II, III, IV, V, and VII:

Section I: Chart of Accounts

Section II: Accounts and Definitions

Section III: Account Transactions

Transactions

Transaction Listing

T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

USSGL Account Attribute Definition Report

USSGL Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2020 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

Statement of Budgetary Resources

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources & Schedule P Budget Program

and Financing Schedule

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2020 Reporting

Page 1 of 2
Validation Summary

Validation Detail

Edit Summary

Edit Detail

Closing Edits

4. Effective Date

Part 2 requirements for FY 2020 are effectively immediately

5. Inquiries

Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Jaime M. Saling

Director, Financial Reports and Advisory Division Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Telephone: 304-480-6485

Fax: 304-480-5176

Date: March 12, 2020

Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:  May 8, 2009
    /s/ John R. KoelmelJohn R. KoelmelPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  May 8, 2009
    /s/ Michael W. HarringtonMichael W. HarringtonChief Financial Officer
| Certification      of Chief Financial Officer | Exhibit      32(b) |
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------------|
| EastGroup      Properties, Inc.               |               |

|   | By:      /s/ N. KEITH      MCKEY                                                                 |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | N.      KEITH MCKEY                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|   | February      26, 2010                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |

----