alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31(ii)

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Richard M. Hewitt, CFO do hereby certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Local Telecom Systems,
Inc

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
           material information relating to the registrant, including its
           consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
           entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
           is being prepared;
        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
           and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date
           of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
        c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
           effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
           evaluation as of the Evaluation Date:

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

        a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
           controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
           record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
           identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
           internal controls; and
        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
           employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
           controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

     Date: February 16, 2005
     ----------------------
                                   /s/Richard M. Hewitt
                                   ------------------------
                                   Richard M. Hewitt, Chief Financial Officer
No. 57990.

protest 21284-L-K (New York).

#### Standard Wine & Liquor Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*454Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the three cases of vermuth reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, w^ere not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
EXHIBIT 10.15

JEFFERSON BANCORP, INC.

RESOLUTIONS AMENDING THE COMPANY'S 1983, 1985, 1987 AND DIRECTORS' 
STOCK OPTION PLANS, ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON DECEMBER 
19, 1995

RESOLVED, that Section 4(k) of the Jefferson Bancorp 1983 Stock 
Option Plan, Section 4(k) of the Jefferson Bancorp 1985 Stock 
Option Plan and Section 4(k) of the Jefferson Bancorp 1987 Stock 
Option Plan be, and each of them hereby is, amended by adding 
the following as the concluding sentence of each such section: 
"If such cancellation is effectively made during the period 
specified in Rule 16b-3(e)(3), promulgated by the Securities 
and Exchange Commission, under the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934, as amended, the fair market value shall be the average 
of the closing prices of the Common Stock during said period 
reported in the automated quotation system (NASDAQ) operated 
by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc."; and 
be it further

RESOLVED, that Section 5(k) of the Jefferson Bancorp Directors' 
Stock Option Plan be, and it hereby is, amended by adding the 
following as the concluding sentence of such section: "If such 
surrender is effectively made during the period specified in 
Rule 16b-3(e)(3), promulgated by the Securities and Exchange 
Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, 
the fair market value shall be the average of the closing prices 
of the Common Stock during said period reported in the automated 
quotation system (NASDAQ) operated by the National Association 
of Securities Dealers, Inc."
# C_2021242EN.01001601.xml

| 21.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2021 — Repower v EUIPO — repowermap.org (REPOWER)

(Case T-842/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark REPOWER - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001))

(2021/C 242/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Repower AG (Brusio, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Kunz-Hallstein and H. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: repowermap.org (Bern, Switzerland) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón and W. Sakulin, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2016 (Case R 2311/2014-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between repowermap.org and Repower.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 September 2016 (Case R 2311/2014-5) in so far as the application for a declaration of invalidity has been upheld in respect of voice tubes in Class 9; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 September 2016 (Case R 2311/2014-5) in so far as the application for a declaration of invalidity has been upheld in respect of voice tubes in Class 9;

| 2. | Dismisses the action for the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action for the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Repower AG to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by EUIPO and repowermap.org. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Repower AG to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by EUIPO and repowermap.org.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

---
No. 55197.

#### Carl Antholz, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 163072-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

April 2, 1948

No. 52245.

protest 130032-K (Los Angeles).

#### William Prentiss, Jr., Trustee in Bankruptcy of National Merchandise Corporation, Bankrupt *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of imitation gut similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *Bush*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

March 22, 1949

No. 52951.

#### Gerhard & Hey Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6713-R (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Petitioner’s import manager, who prepared the entries in question, consulted customs officials prior to entry for information concerning dutiable value of the merchandise and in making the original entries followed the instructions given by the appraiser. Subsequent thereto, and upon advice of counsel, timely amendments were filed at lower values, claimed to be the cost of production. The amended values were advanced by the appraiser to meet the original entered prices, which were adopted as dutiable foreign value. The matter became the subject of much litigation in reappraisement proceedings before this court. In its last decision (Reap. Dec. 7580), the court sustained the importer’s contention as to the proper basis for appraisement, but held that “the record contains no evidence of sufficient probation to establish” such statutory value, and therefore upheld the values found by the appraiser. From the record presented- it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
# sec5_sbr_2021

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2020-21	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout July 16, 2020
No. 48456.

#### Protests 919839-G, etc., of John Morgan, Inc., et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 tli@ court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit
32.2





Statement
of Chief Financial Officer Furnished


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is
the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the
“Company”).





This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I
certify that to the best of my knowledge:





A)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
      and





B)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.





August 13, 2009
              
              /s/ Gary F. HoskinsDated
              
              Gary
      F. HoskinsChief
      Financial Officer





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained
by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Part 2, Section V: USSGL Crosswalks to Standard 

External Reports

This section includes crosswalks for use in Fiscal Year 2024 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map 

USSGL accounts to external reports in accordance with current reporting guidance from the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB), and the 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service).

Each report crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or 

column on the reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This 

subsidiary information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional 

information on attributes.

All crosswalks require pre-closing USSGL account balances.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by 

OMB and Fiscal Service:

Section V Page Number

Balance Sheet (BS) V BS - 1

Statement of Net Cost (SNC) V SNC - 1

Statement of Changes in Net Position (SCNP) V SCNP - 1

Statement of Custodial Activity (SCA) V SCA - 1

Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) V SBR - 1

SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution 

and Budgetary Resources and Budget Program and 

Financing Schedule

V SF 133/Sch P - 1

Page 1 of 1
EX-12



              Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                                       1991    1992    1993    1994    1995 
                                              (Thousands of Dollars)
Fixed Charges, as defined:
  Interest on long-term debt        $ 15,120  16,292  16,166  15,405  14,811
  Other interest                       1,605     586     596   1,771   2,325
  Interest component of rents         
    charged to operating expenses        232     214     183     177     227
Total Fixed Charges, as defined     $ 16,957  17,092  16,945  17,353  17,363

Earnings, as defined:
Net income                          $ 29,510  19,217  18,987  20,667  27,656
Add:
    Income taxes                      17,382   9,698   9,464   9,188  19,453
    Fixed charges                     16,957  17,092  16,945  17,353  17,363
Total Earnings, as defined          $ 63,849  46,007  45,396  47,208  64,472

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges     3.77x   2.69x   2.68x   2.72x   3.71x




              Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                    and Preferred & Preference Dividends

                                       1991    1992    1993    1994    1995 
                                              (Thousands of Dollars)
Fixed Charges, as defined:
  Interest on long-term debt        $ 15,120  16,292  16,166  15,405  14,811
  Other interest                       1,605     586     596   1,771   2,325 
  Interest component of rents         
    charged to operating expenses        232     214     183     177     227 
Total Fixed Charges, as defined     $ 16,957  17,092  16,945  17,353  17,363
Preferred & Preference Dividends,
    as defined (a)                     4,886   4,476   4,287   3,545   4,187
Fixed Charges and Preferred &
  Preference Dividends, as defined  $ 21,843  21,568  21,232  20,898  21,550

Earnings, as defined:
Net income                          $ 29,510  19,217  18,987  20,667  27,656
Add:
    Income taxes                      17,382   9,698   9,464   9,188  19,453
    Fixed charges                     16,957  17,092  16,945  17,353  17,363
Total Earnings, as defined          $ 63,849  46,007  45,396  47,208  64,472

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 
  and Preferred & Preference
  Dividends, as defined                2.92x   2.13x   2.14x   2.26x   2.99x


(a) Preferred and preference dividends have been adjusted by multiplying the
    requirement by the ratio that income before income taxes bears to net
    income.  Such ratios were as follows: 159% in 1991, 151% in 1992, 150% in
    1993, 145% in 1994 and 170% in 1995.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BEVERLY DOVE,

NO. CIV. S-04-522 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISPOSAL

DOCUMENTS AFTER

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

Defendants.

 /

Counsel for plaintiff has informed the court that the parties

have settled the above-captioned case. The court now orders that

the dispositional documents disposing of the case be filed no later

than thirty (30) days from the effective date of this order.

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby

VACATED.

////

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-00522-LKK -DAD Document 64 Filed 02/22/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: February 22, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00522-LKK -DAD Document 64 Filed 02/22/06 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017300EN.01002703.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/27

---

Order of the President of the Court of 30 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Richard Rodriguez Serin v HOP!-Regional

(Case C-539/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 300/33)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.

1

---
----

----

----

AVIS AU LECTEUR

----

Rectificatifs

----

Rectificatif à l'avis de concours généraux EPSO/AD/53-62/06 pour la constitution d'une réserve d'administrateurs (AD5) de citoyennetés chypriote, tchèque, estonienne, hongroise, lituanienne, lettone, maltaise, polonaise, slovène, slovaque dans les domaines de l'administration publique européenne/ressources humaines, du droit, de l'économie et de la microéconomie/business administration

(«Journal officiel de l'Union européenne»C 172 A du 25 juillet 2006)

(2006/C 240 A/01)

Page 11, au titre B, point 1:

au lieu de:

«Pour l'ensemble des tests d'accès, les candidats (4) (voir tableau ci-dessous) ayant obtenu les meilleures notes ainsi que le minimum requis à chacun de ces tests seront invités à soumettre une candidature complète en vue de leur admission au concours.

lire:

«Pour l'ensemble des tests d'accès, les candidats (4) (voir tableau ci-dessous) ayant obtenu les meilleures notes ainsi que le minimum requis à chacun de ces tests seront invités à soumettre une candidature complète en vue de leur admission au concours.

Page 13, au titre C, point 1:

au lieu de:

«Le jury procédera à la correction des épreuves écrites b) et c) des candidats (4) (voir tableau ci-dessous) ayant obtenu les meilleures notes ainsi que le minimum requis à l'épreuve écrite a).

lire:

«Le jury procédera à la correction des épreuves écrites b) et c) des candidats (4) (voir tableau ci-dessous) ayant obtenu les meilleures notes ainsi que le minimum requis à l'épreuve écrite a).

Page 14, au titre C, point 2:

au lieu de:

«2.   Épreuve orale — Notation

À l'issue de la correction des épreuves écrites b) et c), les candidats (4) (voir tableau ci-dessous) ayant obtenu les meilleures notes pour l'ensemble de ces épreuves ainsi que le minimum requis à chacune de ces épreuves seront invités à l'épreuve orale d).

lire:

«2.   Épreuve orale — Notation

À l'issue de la correction des épreuves écrites b) et c), les candidats (4) (voir tableau ci-dessous) ayant obtenu les meilleures notes pour l'ensemble de ces épreuves ainsi que le minimum requis à chacune de ces épreuves seront invités à l'épreuve orale d).

----
No. 47324.

#### Protests 10352-K, etc., of C. S. Emery & Co. (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that fhe subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported and that no addition should have been made for planing, or tonguing and grooving. Protests sustained to this extent.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in LocalRule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-20625

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD QUINONEZ-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 94-CV-2906

July 8, 1996

Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Donald Quinonez-Martinez argues that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion for abuse of procedure. We have viewed the record, the opinion of the

district court, and the briefs, and find that the district court did not abuse its discretion. Therefore,

the denial of Quinonez-Martinez’s § 2255 motion is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by

the district court. United States v. Quinonez-Martinez, No. H-94-2906 (S.D. Tex. June 1, 1995).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: CRIMINAL ACTION 

v. : 

: NO. 05-307-3

REGINALD YOUNG : 

______________________________________________________________________________

REGINALD YOUNG :

: CIVIL ACTION 

v. : 

: NO. 10-5518

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : 

ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of January , 2012, upon consideration of

Petitioner’s Motion To Vacate, Set Aside, Or Correct Sentence By A Person In Federal Custody

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 269, 05-307-3), it is ORDERED that the Motion is

DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________

R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.

Case 2:05-cr-00307-RBS Document 288 Filed 01/20/12 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6308

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ALAND TRACY HALL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CR-94-92, CA-01-4-7)

Submitted: April 27, 2001 Decided: May 7, 2001

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aland Tracy Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Aland Tracy Hall appeals the district court’s orders: (1)

dismissing without prejudice his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2000) motion for failure to obtain authorization pursuant to 28

U.S.C.A. § 2244 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000); and (2) denying his

motion for reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Hall, Nos. CR-94-92; CA-01-4-7 (W.D. Va.

Jan. 5 and 24, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED