alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Years Ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Earnings (loss)(1)Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes
    
    $
    235.7
    
    
    $
    (5.0
    )
    
    $
    (186.6
    )
    
    $
    (267.0
    )
    
    $
    (372.8
    )Fixed charges(1)Interest expense and other charges
    
    $
    236.7
    
    
    $
    218.7
    
    
    $
    181.9
    
    
    $
    172.0
    
    
    $
    206.6Interest factor of net operating rents (3)
    
    
    185.6
    
    
    
    185.1
    
    
    
    183.9
    
    
    
    190.0
    
    
    
    192.7Total fixed charges
    
    $
    422.3
    
    
    $
    403.8
    
    
    $
    365.8
    
    
    $
    362.0
    
    
    $
    399.3Earnings, as adjusted
    
    $
    658.0
    
    
    $
    398.8
    
    
    $
    179.2
    
    
    $
    95.0
    
    
    $
    26.5Ratio of earnings to fixed charges(2)
    
    
    1.6
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    N/A
 
 (1)
    
    Earnings (loss) consist of income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes, income applicable to minority interests and equity in net income of unconsolidated
affiliates, plus fixed charges. Fixed charges primarily consist of interest on indebtedness,
amortization of debt discount, waiver and other amendment fees, debt issuance costs (all
included in interest expense) and the portion of net rental expense deemed representative of
the interest component (one-third).(2)
    
    We had a less than 1:1 ratio of earnings to fixed charges due to our losses in the
years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003. To provide a 1:1 coverage ratio for the
deficient periods, results as reported would have required additional earnings of $5.0,
$186.6, $267.0 and $372.8 in 2006, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.(3)
    
    We have calculated the interest factor of net operating rents as one third of our
operating rents, as this represents a reasonable approximation of the interest factor.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Inco Limited (the registrant) on Form 10-K for the
year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the report), we, Scott M. Hand, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and Farokh S.
Hakimi, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our
knowledge:  (1)

The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)

The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the registrant. March 14, 2005 (Signed) SCOTT M. HAND  
 (Signed) FAROKH S. HAKIMI
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 90 

Note 6. General Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net 

General Property, Plant, and Equipment, net as of September 30, 2023, and 2022 

Accumulated Accumulated 

Depreciation/ Depreciation/ 

Cost Amortization Net Cost Amortization Net 

(In billions of dollars) 2023 2022 

Buildings, structures, and facilities 754.0 448.7 305.3 720.0 421.6 298.4 

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment 1,457.6 891.3 566.3 1,442.5 868.2 574.3 

Construction in progress 297.8 N/A 297.8 260.4 N/A 260.4 

Internal use software 69.3 43.3 26.0 66.1 40.9 25.2 

Land 22.9 N/A 22.9 22.4 N/A 22.4 

Other general property, plant, and equipment 36.5 19.8 16.7 35.2 18.4 16.8 

Total general property, plant, and equipment, 

net 2,638.1 1,403.1 1,235.0 2,546.6 1,349.1 1,197.5 

Note: "N/A" indicates not applicable. 

General PP&E consists of tangible assets, including land. Internal use software, land rights, assets acquired through 

capital leases, and leasehold improvements are also included. DOD comprises approximately 67.4 percent of the 

government’s reported general PP&E, net as of September 30, 2023. DOD continues to implement SFFAS No. 50, 

Establishing Opening Balances for General Property, Plant, and Equipment which permits alternative methods in 

establishing opening balances for general PP&E and has elected to exclude land and land rights. The total acreage excluded 

was 23,463,823 as of September 30, 2023, and 22,958,006 as of September 30, 2022. Differences year over year are due to 

DOD understating general PP&E due to asset balances that had a change in acquisition cost, change in acquisition date, 

retrospective depreciation adjustments, and unrecorded asset transfers in prior years. 

The following entities are the main contributors to the government’s reported general PP&E net of $1,235.0 billion as of 

September 30, 2023. Please refer to each entity’s financial statements for additional information. 

x DOD 

x DOE 

x GSA 

x DOC 

x Treasury 

x HHS 

x DOI 

x USPS 

x DHS 

x USDA 

x SSA 

x NASA 

x VA 

x TVA 

x State 

x DOJ 

x DOT 

Certain PP&E are multi-use heritage assets, see Note 26—Stewardship Property, Plant, and Equipment for additional 

information on multi-use heritage assets. Please refer to DM&R and Land and Permanent Land Rights located in the 

unaudited RSI for information concerning the estimated maintenance and repair costs related to PP&E and the federal 

estimated acreage by predominant use.
No. 64829.

#### Iceland Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/27816, 59/27817, and 59/28595 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             BULL & BEAR GROUP, INC.



     Bull & Bear Group, Inc., a corporation  organized and existing under and by
virtue  of  the  General   Corporation   Law  of  the  State  of  Delaware  (the
"Corporation"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:

                        FIRST:         The Board of Directors of the Corporation
has adopted the following  resolutions  proposing  and  declaring  advisable the
following amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation:

                                    "RESOLVED,  that the  amendment  to  Article
                        FIRST of the Corporation's Certificate of Incorporation,
                        to read in its entirety as follows (the "Amendment"), is
                        hereby  proposed and declared to be advisable and in the
                        best interests of the Corporation:

                                    "FIRST:      The name of the Corporation is:
                        Winmill & Co. Incorporated."

                        SECOND:        Thereafter, pursuant to resolution of its
Board  of  Directors,  in lieu  of a  meeting  and  vote  of  stockholders,  the
stockholders  of  the  Corporation  gave  a  unanimous  written  consent  to the
Amendment in accordance  with the provisions of the General  Corporation  Law of
the State of Delaware.

                        THIRD:         The Amendment  has  been  duly adopted in
accordance with  theprovisions of Section 242 of the General  Corporation Law of
the State of Delaware.


                        IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Corporation  has  caused  its
corporate seal to be hereunto  affixed and this  certificate to be signed by the
undersigned this 1st day of April, 1999.

                                                         BULL & BEAR GROUP, INC.


                                                        By:/s/ Thomas B. Winmill
                                                           ---------------------
                                                         Name: Thomas B. Winmill
                                                                Title: President
# sec5_balsh_2024

&"Arial,Bold"&10Balance Sheet FEVBP Changes	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 02/15/2023
## Draft Proposal CB-10

This concept has been developed by the DOE Building Energy Codes Program (BECP) as a possible code

change proposal to the Commercial provisions of the 2012 International Energy Conservation Code

(IECC). Interested parties are asked to submit any and all comments on DOE's initial concepts and draft

code change proposals. For instructions on submitting comments, visit:

www.energycodes.gov/development/ commercial/codes/iecc/concepts/



## Skylight Curbs Insulation Exemption (CB-10)

Objective: Clarify when a skylight curb can be exempted from meeting the requirements for insulating

the curb.

Suggested Code Change Proposal

Revise Exception number 2 to Section C402.2.1 as follows:

C402.2.1 Roof assembly.

Exceptions:

1

. (Remains unchanged.)

2. Unit skylight curbs included as a component of an NFRC 100 rated assembly a skylight listed

and labeled in accordance with NFRC 100 shall not be required to be insulated.

Reason: Clarification of language. The term “rated” is generally understood but the correct

presentation of the criterion is that the assembly be listed and labeled in accordance with NFRC 100.

Cost Impact: There is no cost impact associated with this proposed change.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-11	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/23/23
No. 60798.

#### F. B. Vandegrift *&*Co. *v.*United States,

protest 145619-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rates applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content Under T. D. 53159” in the schedule included in the stipulation.
# C_2016232EN.01000201.xml

| 27.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover (Germany) lodged on 17 February 2016 — Angelika Eckert v Société Air France SA

(Case C-95/16)

(2016/C 232/02)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Angelika Eckert

Applicant:

Defendant: Société Air France SA

Defendant:

The case was removed from the Register of the Court of Justice by order of the Court of 19 April 2016.

---
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Officer Certifications**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., a *sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable*organized under the laws of Mexico (the “Company”), does hereby certify to such officer’s knowledge that: 

The annual report onForm 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company. 

Dated: April 30, 2015 

 

Dated: April 30, 2015 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and willbe retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
April
      30,
      2007




Brian
      Israel


550
      N.
      Kingsbury, Unit #601 Chicago, IL 60610




Dear
      Brian:




This
      letter is our formal invitation to you for an appointment to the Z Trim
      Holdings, Inc. Board of Directors. Each month you are required to attend board
      meetings which or at
      3:00pm on the third Wednesday of every month at our offices in Mundelein,
      Illinois, unless there **are** five
      Wednesdays in a given month in which case the meeting is the fourth Wednesday.
      The meetings last between 2 and 3 hours.




For
      your
      appointment, the Company is prepared to immedsately grant you 200,000 options
      of
      ZTM stock provided under the Company's approved 2004 Employee option plan.
      The
      strike price will be decided **on** the
      date
      of **your** signature
      of **acceptance** to
      this **letter.**




**We
      believe you will be an asset to our hoard and would be thrilled if you accept
      the appointment**




**By
      signing below and faxing back to me ai 847-549-6028, you are signifying your
      acceptance of the terms outlined herein which is the same date that your
      services as a board member will commence. If** **you
      have any questions, please contact me at 847-549-6002.**






Verytruly
                yours,Date:
            By:
            /s/ Gregory
              J. HalpemGregory
                J. HalpemC.E.O.






Accepted
                and agreed to as of the date first above written:By:
                /s/ Brian Israel
              Brian Israel
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Committee for Purchase from People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled

                    In the document appearing on page 3782, FR Doc E7-1271, Procurement List Additions and Deletions, in the issue of Friday, January 26, 2007, in the first column, the Committee published deletion of a service for Grounds Maintenance, Marine Corps Air Station, San Diego, CA. This notice corrects that deletion of the service to read as follows: for Grounds Maintenance, Marine Corps Air Station, Bachelors Quarters Only, San Diego, CA. The other deletions announced in the Notice                           ( print page 8150)                        remain the same. The effective date of February 25, 2007 remains the same.                 

Sheryl D. Kennerly, 

Director, Information Management. 

[FR Doc. E7-3130 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
<PAGE>


                                                                  EXHIBIT 99.2




                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                        OF AMERICAN BANKNOTE CORPORATION



     This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002,and
accompanies the annual report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K") for the year ended
December 31, 2002 of American Banknote Corporation (the "Company").

     I, Patrick J. Gentile, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify
that to the best of my knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



         Dated: March 31, 2003.



                                                        /s/ PATRICK J. GENTILE
                                                       ------------------------
                                                       Name: Patrick J. Gentile
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTIAGO SOTO,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0571 FCD GGH P

vs.

WARDEN D.L. RUNNELS,

Defendant. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On January 5, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff

has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-00571-FCD-GGH Document 46 Filed 03/02/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 5, 2006, are adopted in full;

and

2. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction, filed on March 17, 2005, is

denied.

DATED:March 1, 2006

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00571-FCD-GGH Document 46 Filed 03/02/06 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

INTERNATIONAL ALUMINUM CORPORATION

SUBSIDIARIES

 

The following is a list of the significant subsidiaries of theRegistrant and the jurisdiction under which each is organized.  The Company owns 100 percent of the votingsecurities of each such subsidiary.

 
| **Name Of Subsidiary**                                  |   | **Jurisdiction  Of  Organization** |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                    |   |                               |   |
| International Window Corporation                        |   | California                         |   |
| General Window Corporation*                             |   | California                         |   |
| International Window-Arizona, Inc.                      |   | California                         |   |
| United States Aluminum Corporation                      |   | California                         |   |
| United States Aluminum Corporation-Illinois             |   | California                         |   |
| United States Aluminum Corporation-Texas                |   | Texas                              |   |
| United States Aluminum Corporation-Carolina             |   | California                         |   |
| United States Aluminum Of Canada-British  Columbia Ltd. |   | Canada                             |   |
| United States Aluminum Of Canada-Ontario  Ltd.          |   | Canada                             |   |
| Raco Interior Products, Inc.                            |   | Texas                              |   |
| International Extrusion Corporation                     |   | California                         |   |
| International Extrusion Corporation-Texas               |   | California                         |   |

 

----

*  dba InternationalWindow-Northern California

 

----
EX-4.14 Share Transfer Agreement









Exhibit 4.14




Share Transfer Agreement




Transferor (“Party A”): FENG Lei

Transferee (“Party B”): Beijing Run An Information Consultancy Company Limited



According to the articles of incorporation of Beijing Qian Cheng Si Jin Advertising Company Limited
and Party A’s request, Party A and Party B each agree to sign this Share Transfer Agreement on
November 12, 2007, in Room 704 of Global Trade Center Building B, located on No. 36 North Third
Circle Road (E), Dong Cheng District, Beijing.



Party A will transfer all the equity interest he possesses in Beijing Qian Cheng Si Jin Advertising
Company Limited in the amount RMB1,300,000, which is equal to 87% of the registered capital, to
Party B.



Upon the date that both Parties have signed this Agreement, the share ownership transfer
transaction shall be completed. Party A shall bear the creditor rights and debt obligations before
the transfer and Party B shall bear the creditor rights and debt obligations occurred after the
transfer.




	 	 	 
	Party A (signature):

	 	Party B (signature):
	 
	 	 
	/s/ FENG Lei                                            

	 	[Company Seal of Beijing Run An Information Consultancy Co., Ltd.]






November 12, 2007
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1 Although the parties continue to include “Doe” Defendants in

their captions, the “Doe” Defendants were dismissed and the caption was

amended in the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order filed June 17, 2004.

The parties shall use the correct caption in future filings. 

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAMON BRINDLE, )

) CV. S-04-590 GEB DAD

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) 

) ORDER

ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, an ) 

Illinois Corporation,1 )

)

Defendant. )

)

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the

Alternative for Partial Summary Judgment, which was filed on January

19, 2005, is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: May 9, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00590-GEB-DAD Document 19 Filed 05/09/05 Page 1 of 1
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

09/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Sep 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.11 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection VII&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 9/25/18