alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET, STATEMENT OF EARNINGS AND CASH FLOWS AND
ACCOMPANYING NOTES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1998
<CASH>                                          10,363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  148,947
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,746
<INVENTORY>                                    265,989
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               484,404
<PP&E>                                         372,085
<DEPRECIATION>                                 151,518
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 827,386
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          312,423
<BONDS>                                        162,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,184
<OTHER-SE>                                     307,169
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   827,386
<SALES>                                      2,611,792
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,611,792
<CGS>                                        2,401,501
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,401,501
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  (228)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,643
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,395
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,371
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,024
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
        

</TABLE>
----

Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2006 — Finland v Commission

(Case T-350/05) (1)

(Preliminary issues - Objection of inadmissibility - Act without binding legal effect - Own resources of the European Communities - Infringement procedure - Default interest provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1150/2000 - Negotiation of an agreement on a conditional payment)

(2006/C 281/64)

Language of the case: Finnish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: T. Pynnä and E. Bygglin, Agents)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Aalto and G. Wilms, Agents)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Commission (General Secretariat) contained in the letter of 8 July 2005, by which the Commission refused to open negotiations with the Republic of Finland concerning the conditional payment of duties claimed retroactively together with default interest accrued up to the date of payment of those duties, claimed by the Commission from the Republic of Finland in the context of infringement procedure No 2003/2180, brought under Article 226 EC.

Operative part of the order

----

(1)OJ C 281, 12.11.2005.

----
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-7159

ROBERT B. WISTER,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI,

Secretary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in

08-0196, Chief Judge William P. Greene, Jr.

Before GAJARSA, LINN, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Robert B. Wister and the Secretary of Veterans Affairs each respond to the

court's order concerning whether Robert B. Wister's appeal should be dismissed as

premature. Wister submits a supplemental response.

The United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims entered an order

denying Wister's motion to strike the Secretary's designation of the record on July 10,

2008. Wister filed a notice of appeal seeking review of the July 10 order. Because it

appeared that the July 10 order was not a final decision, this court directed Wister to

show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed as premature.

Wister responds that the court has authority to review the order on appeal

pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §§ 301 and 706. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 301, the head of an
executive department may prescribe regulations. 5 U.S.C. § 706 sets forth the scope of

review of certain agency actions. Neither provision provides this court with jurisdiction

to review interlocutory decisions of the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

This court's jurisdiction is generally limited to reviewing final decisions of the

Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims. See 38 U.S.C. § 7292. In this case, the Court of

Appeals for Veterans Claims has not issued a final decision. Thus, the appeal is

dismissed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The appeal is dismissed.

Each side shall bear its own costs.

FOR THE COURT

FEB 6 2009	/s/ Jan Horbaly

Date	 Jan Horbaly

Clerk

cc:	Robert B. Wister

Christopher A. Bowen, Esq.

s17

FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

FEB 0 6 2009

Alt) iTOHISHLY

CLERK

2008-7159	 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

BERWICK TOWNSHIP,

Respondent

v.

ROBERT F. O'BRIEN, LINDA A. O'BRIEN, ROBERT F. O'BRIEN, JR., AND LYDIA A. O'BRIEN,

Petitioners :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 923 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 17th day of May, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
<PAGE>






                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Flagstar Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
W. Carrie, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated:  May 9, 2003                      by:      /s/ Michael W. Carrie

                                                  Michael W. Carrie
                                                  Executive Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer











                                       15
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT
TO




SECTION
1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Uwe
Eberle, the President, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer
of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I
L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the
Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.




Date:  August 14,
2008


/s/ Uwe
Eberle


Uwe Eberle


President and Chief Executive
Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6911

HARRY SHAROD JAMES , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. TOM BRICKHOUSE; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , Respondents

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Frank D. Whitney , District Judge. ( 3:19

- cv - 00070

- FDW )

Submitted : March 19, 2021 Decided: June 1, 2021

Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and RUSHING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Harry Sharod James , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Harry Sharod James seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of t he denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists c ould find the district court’s assessment of the constitutiona l claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v.
Davis , 137 S. Ct. 759, 773

- 74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable and that the petition state s a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Gonzalez v. Thaler , 565 U.S. 134, 140

- 41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel , 529
U.S. 473, 484 (2000))

. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that James has not made the requisi te showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the deci sional process.
DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

CHRISTOPHER ANTHONY TAYLOR, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 778 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MERRICK JOSE MOORE,

Plaintiff, 2:04-cv-0763-GEB-KJM-P

vs.

S. SALENGER, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On March 3, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any

objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fifteen days. Plaintiff has

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-

304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

proper analysis.

Case 2:04-cv-00763-GEB-CKD Document 38 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 3, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. Defendants Bishop, Jackson, Moore, Norton, Quezada, Everett, Look, Salenger

and Cornish are dismissed from this action. 

Dated: March 29, 2006

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00763-GEB-CKD Document 38 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 2
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4362 — Voestalpine/K+N/Euroshipping)

(2006/C 267/06)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 26 September 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
For Prothonotary Use Only (Docket Number) Court of Common Pleas of 

Philadelphia County - Trial Division

 Civil Cover Sheet

Plaintiff’s Name

PHASE FORWARD INCORPORATED

Defendant’s Name

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY A MEMBER OF

CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES

Plaintiff’s Address

1440 Main Street

Waltham, MA 02451

Defendant’s Address

One Liberty Place

1650 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-7301

Defendant’s Name Defendant’s Name

Defendant’s Address Defendant’s Address

Total Number of

Plaintiffs

 1

Total No. of Defendants

1

Commencement of Action

X Complaint  Petition Action 

 Notice of Appeal  Transfer From Other Jurisdiction

__ Writ of Summons 

Amount in

Controversy

 $50,000.00 or less

X More than $50,000.00

Court Programs

__ Arbitration  Mass Tort  Commerce  Settlement

 Jury  Savings Action  Minor Court Appeal  Minors

X Non-Jury  Petition  Statutory Appeals  W/D/Survival

 Other

CASE TYPE AND CODE (See Instructions)

STATUTORY BASIS FOR CAUSE OF ACTION (See Instructions)

RELATED PENDING CASES (List by case caption and docket no.) Is Case Subject to 

Coordination Order?

Yes No

 

 

TO THE PROTHONOTARY:

Name of Plaintiff’s/Petitioner’s/Appellant’s Attorney

Hugh J. Hutchison, Esquire

Phone Number 

215-567-1530 

Fax Number

215-564-4611

Address (See Instructions)

Leonard, Tillery & Sciolla, LLP

1515 Market Street, 18th Floor

Philadelphia, Pa 19102

Case 2:02-cv-04430-JK Document 1-2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 1 of 2
Supreme Court Identification No.

02381

E-mail Address

Hhutchison@leonardtillery.com

Signature Date 

Case 2:02-cv-04430-JK Document 1-2 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 36 (Friday, February 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3059]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee <greek-i>13883; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 
(<greek-i>13883) meeting:

    Date and Time: March 9, 2007 1:45--3:30 p.m. EST.
    Place: Teleconference. National Science Foundation, Room 1045, 
Stafford I Building, 4121 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA, 22230.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. G. Wayne Van Citters, Director, Division of 
Astronomical Sciences, Suite 1045, National Science Foundation, 4201 
Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4908.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations to the 
National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Aeronautics and 
Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 
on issues within the field of astronomy and astrophysics that are of 
mutual interest and concern to the agencies.
    Agenda: To discuss the Committee's draft annual report due 15 
March 2007.

    Dated: February 16, 2007.
Susanne E. Bolton,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E7-3059 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Before the First Division,

November 7, 1960

No. 64825.

#### Osan Supply Company *v.*United States,

protest 58/18501 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
----

Order of the Court of 13 July 2006 — Front National and Others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union

(Case C-338/05 P) (1)

(Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 - Regulation and funding of political parties at European level - Action for annulment - Objection of inadmissibility - Act open to challenge - Standing to bring proceedings - Inadmissibility - Appeal manifestly inadmissible)

(2006/C 224/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: Front National, Marie-France Stirbois, Bruno Gollnisch, Carl Lang, Jean-Claude Martinez, Philip Claeys, Koen Dillen and Mario Borghezio (represented by: W. de Saint Just, avocat)

Respondents: European Parliament (represented by: H. Krück, N. Lorenz and D. Moore, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: I. Díez Parra and M. Sims-Robertson, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment delivered on 11 July 2005 by the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) in Case T-17/04 Front National and Others v European Parliament and Council, by which it dismissed as inadmissible an action for annulment of Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding (OJ 2003 L 297, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

The Court hereby:

----

(1)OJ C 315 of 10.12.2005

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Larry Joseph Thomas,

Petitioner, No. Civ. S 04-0733 MCE PAN 

vs. Order

A. K. Scribner, et al.,

Respondents.

-oOoGood cause appearing, respondents’ untimely July 20, 2005,

motion for reconsideration is denied without prejudice. 

Respondents shall respond to the petition within 20 days,

and may do so by filing and serving either an answer or a motion

to dismiss.

So ordered.

Dated: October 18, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00733-MCE -DAD Document 39 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE>
                                                                                     EXHIBIT 11(i)


                                            INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
                                   COMPUTATION OF PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE
                       (In millions of dollars except for shares and per share amounts)
                                                            Years ended December 31,                     
                                             1995          1994          1993          1992          1991
     PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
     Earnings before effect of
     <S>                                   <C>           <C>           <C>          <C>            <C>
       accounting changes..........        $270.3        $211.1        $163.5       $ 115.6        $150.6
     Effect of accounting changes:
       - Postemployment benefits               --            --         (21.0)           --            --
       - Postretirement benefits
         other than pensions.......            --            --            --        (332.0)           --
       - Income taxes..............            --            --            --         (18.0)           --
     Net earnings (loss) applicable
       to common stock.............        $270.3        $211.1        $142.5       $(234.4)       $150.6

     Average number of common
       shares outstanding..........   106,069,078   105,458,116   104,991,535   104,340,622   103,634,178

     Primary earnings per share:
     Earnings before effect of
       accounting changes..........         $2.55         $2.00        $ 1.56        $ 1.11         $1.45
       Effect of accounting changes:
         - Postemployment benefits             --            --         (0.20)           --            --
         - Postretirement benefits
           other than pensions.....            --            --            --         (3.19)           --
         - Income taxes............            --            --            --         (0.17)           --
     Primary earnings (loss) per
       share.......................         $2.55         $2.00        $ 1.36        $(2.25)        $1.45

     Notes:  All common share and per share amounts have been adjusted for the 2-for-1 stock split  which
     was made  in the form of a  stock dividend in 1992.  Shares  issuable under outstanding stock plans,
     applying the "Treasury Stock"  method, have been excluded  from the computation of  primary earnings
     per share  since such shares  were less than  1% of common shares  outstanding, as follows:   1995 -
     498,456; 1994 - 496,893; 1993 - 600,429; 1992 - 738,149; 1991 - 632,056.<PAGE>
<PAGE>
</TABLE>
                                                      112<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

          <ARTICLE>    5
          <MULTIPLIER>      1,000
                 
          <S>                                <C>
          <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    DEC-31-1996 
          <PERIOD-START>                                       JAN-01-1996 
          <PERIOD-END>                                         DEC-31-1996 
          <PERIOD-TYPE>                      12-MOS
          <CASH>                                                    19,365 
          <SECURITIES>                                                   0 
          <RECEIVABLES>                                            302,541 
          <ALLOWANCES>                                              19,124 
          <INVENTORY>                                              281,107 
          <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         607,267 
          <PP&E>                                                   425,729 
          <DEPRECIATION>                                           123,767 
          <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,269,204 
          <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    144,606 
          <BONDS>                                                  572,600 
          <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0 
          <PREFERRED>                                                    0 
          <COMMON>                                                  61,432 
          <OTHER-SE>                                               278,554 
          <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,269,204 
          <SALES>                                                1,696,795 
          <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,696,795 
          <CGS>                                                  1,228,355 
          <TOTAL-COSTS>                                          1,228,355 
          <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0 
          <LOSS-PROVISION>                                           6,179 
          <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        45,217 
          <INCOME-PRETAX>                                           88,292 
          <INCOME-TAX>                                              34,070 
          <INCOME-CONTINUING>                                       54,222 
          <DISCONTINUED>                                                 0 
          <EXTRAORDINARY>                                           (7,417)
          <CHANGES>                                                      0 
          <NET-INCOME>                                              46,805 
          <EPS-PRIMARY>                                               0.76 
          <EPS-DILUTED>                                               0.74 
                  
          
</TABLE>