alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER




I,
Rhowena Blank, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P.
(“registrant”);




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrant’s
other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of  internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control
over financial reporting.




By:  /s/ Rhowena Blank


Rhowena
Blank


Vice
President and Head of Accounting and Operations


November
13, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           28200
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   100600
<ALLOWANCES>                                       900
<INVENTORY>                                      15300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                171500
<PP&E>                                         1408700
<DEPRECIATION>                                   45800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1731000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           208000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      556000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1731000
<SALES>                                         622500
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                622500
<CGS>                                           394600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   394600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                (6600)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               28200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 206300
<INCOME-TAX>                                     70100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             136200
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    136200
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018022EN.01003902.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2017 — Laboratorios Ern v EUIPO — Sharma (NRIM Life Sciences)

(Case T-909/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark NRIM Life Sciences - Earlier national word mark RYM - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2001)))

(2018/C 022/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laboratorios Ern, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Anil K. Sharma (Hillingdon, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2016 (Case R 2376/2015-5), concerning opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Ern and Mr Sharma.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Laboratorios Ern, SA, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Laboratorios Ern, SA, to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.

1

---
1

Joint Committee on Taxation

May 2, 2002

JCX-34-02

DESCRIPTION OF CHAIRMAN’S AMENDMENT TO H.R. 4626,

 THE “ENCOURAGING WORK

 AND SUPPORTING MARRIAGE ACT OF 2002”

Scheduled for a Markup by the House Committee on Ways and Means on May 2, 2002

Description of the Combined Tax Credit in H.R. 4626

Targeted groups eligible for the combined work opportunity tax credit and welfare to work tax 

credit

The Encouraging Work and Supporting Marriage Act of 2002 would combine the work 

opportunity tax credit and the welfare to work tax credit. The combined credit would be 

available on an elective basis for employers hiring individuals from one or more of nine targeted 

groups. The nine targeted groups would be: (1) certain families eligible to receive benefits under 

the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program; (2) high-risk youth; (3) qualified exfelons; (4) vocational rehabilitation referrals; (5) qualified summer youth employees; (6) 

qualified veterans; (7) families receiving food stamps; (8) persons receiving certain 

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits; and (9) qualified long-term family assistance 

recipients.

Vocational rehabilitation referral targeted group

The combined credit would retain the present-law definitions for purposes of the 

vocational rehabilitation referral targeted group. Vocational rehabilitation referrals would be 

those individuals who have a physical or mental disability that constitutes a substantial handicap 

to employment and who have been referred to the employer while receiving, or after completing, 

vocational rehabilitation services under an individualized, written rehabilitation plan under a 

State plan approved under the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 or under a rehabilitation plan for 

veterans carried out under Chapter 31 of Title 38, U.S. Code. Certification would be provided by 

the designated local employment agency upon assurances from the vocation rehabilitation 

agency that the employee has met the above conditions.
2

Description of Proposal

The Chairman’s amendment1 would add an additional type of individual eligible for the 

credit under the category of vocational rehabilitation referrals. Under the amendment, certain 

individuals who have a physical or mental disability that constitutes a substantial handicap to 

employment and who are receiving vocational services or have completed an individual work 

plan developed by a private employment network as defined under section 1148(f) of the Social 

Security Act would qualify as members of the vocational rehabilitation referral targeted group.

Effective Date

The proposal would be effective for wages paid or incurred with respect to qualified 

individuals who begin work for an employer after December 31, 2002.

 

1

 The Chairman’s amendment also includes a technical drafting change to the 

acceleration of the basic standard deduction marriage penalty relief provision of H.R. 4626.
No. 53507.

protests 142057-K, etc. (New York).

#### D. & A. Sclafani et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 21



SUBSIDIARY LIST



|                                                              |  |              
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY INCORPORATION                              |  | STATE OF     
|Oglebay Norton Engineered Materials, Inc.                     |  | Ohio         
|Oglebay Norton Industrial Sands, Inc.                         |  | California   
|Oglebay Norton Management Company                             |  | Ohio         
|Oglebay Norton Marine Management Company, L.L.C.              |  | Delaware     
|Oglebay Norton Marine Services Company, L.L.C.                |  | Delaware     
|Oglebay Norton Minerals, Inc.                                 |  | Delaware     
|Oglebay Norton Specialty Minerals, Inc.                       |  | Ohio         
|Oglebay Norton Terminals, Inc. d/b/a/ Cleveland Bulk Terminal |  | Ohio         
|ON Coast Petroleum Company                                    |  | Texas        
|ON Marine Services Company                                    |  | Delaware     
|ONCO Investment Company                                       |  | Delaware     
|ONCO WVA, Inc.                                                |  | West Virginia
|ONMS Management Company, LLC                                  |  | Delaware     
|ONTEX, Inc.                                                   |  | Delaware     
|Saginaw Mining Company                                        |  | Ohio         
|Texas Mining, LP                                              |  | Delaware     
|Global Stone Corporation                                      |  | Ohio         
|Global Stone Chemstone Company                                |  | Delaware     
|Global Stone Filler Products Company                          |  | Delaware     
|Global Stone James River, Inc.                                |  | Delaware     
|Global Stone Management Company                               |  | Georgia      
|Global Stone PenRoc, LP                                       |  | Pennsylvania 
|Global Stone Portage, LLC                                     |  | Indiana      
|Global Stone St. Clair Inc.                                   |  | Delaware     
|Global Stone Tenn Luttrell Company                            |  | Delaware     
|GS Lime Company                                               |  | Georgia      
|GS PC Inc.                                                    |  | Delaware     
|Michigan Limestone Operations, Inc.                           |  | Michigan     
|Erie Sand and Gravel Company                                  |  | Pennsylvania 
|Erie Navigation Company                                       |  | Pennsylvania 
|Erie Steamship Company                                        |  | Delaware     
|Mountfort Terminal, Ltd.                                      |  | Pennsylvania
Case 2:05-cv-06004-LDD Document 1 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-06004-LDD Document 1 Filed 11/14/05 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-06004-LDD Document 1 Filed 11/14/05 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-06004-LDD Document 1 Filed 11/14/05 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-06004-LDD Document 1 Filed 11/14/05 Page 5 of 5
#   7

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&18&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-01	&"Arial,Bold"VII EDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12-8-16

#   10

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&18&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-01	&"Arial,Bold"VII EDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12-8-16
Presentation to the SGL Board

February 24, 1999

Proposal to Establish a Standard General Ledger Account

For 

Allocation Transfers from Prior Year Balances

This proposal illustrates an allocation transfer of prior year balances and is applicable to general funds. It was recommended that a separate account be established for allocation transfer of prior year balances by a FACTS II subcommittee whose purpose is to ensure that the SGL and FACTS II  provide consistent guidance.  Currently, only  allocation transfers from current year balances are captured in an SGL account (4175-Allocation Transfers from Current-Year Balances).  The following outline summarizes some important aspects of allocation transfers for both current year and prior year. 

1. Purpose:

Transfers to Carry Out the Purposes of the Parent Treasury Appropriation Fund Symbol (TAFS).  

2. Establishment:

The authority to obligate and spend funds made available to one TAFS may be delegated to another TAFS in law.  The authority is made available to the parent TAFS while the authority to obligate and spend is delegated to the transfer TAFS.

3. TAFS Accounts:

The allocation account carries the same symbol and title as the parent account with the 2-digit prefix of the receiving agency.  

Parent TAFS: 12X0200

Transfer TAFS: 46-12X0200

4. Availability:

Available for obligation only for the same period as the parent TAFS

5. Apportionment:

Parent will submit a consolidated S.F. 132 covering both the parent and all allocations.

6. Reports on Budget Execution: 

The parent will submit a consolidated S.F. 133 covering both the parent and the transfer TAFS.

In the following scenario transactions are shown for both the parent TAFS and the transfer (receiving TAFS).  The parent receives the authority in year 1 and transfers the allocation in year 2 via 1151 Non- expenditure Transfer Authorization. The transfer TAFS obligates and expends the authority in year 2.  The parent TAFS expires at the end of year 2 and is canceled five years later.

February 24, 1999

17. Statements - Year 2

**Account Title:**Allocation Transfer - Prior-Year Balances

**Account Number:**4176

**Normal Balance:**Either

**Type of Account:**Posting

**Definition:**The amount of prior year balances transferred between a parent appropriation and a transfer appropriation during the fiscal year. Fund balance transfers, which may or may not occur at the time of the transfer of balances, will be accomplished via SF-1151 Nonexpenditure transfer Authorization.

�Per A-34, section 11.2: The agency responsible for administering the parent appropriation will submit a consolidated SF 132 covering both the parent account and all allocations therefrom. (Usually, the receiving agencies will not prepare an SF 132 for transfer appropriation accounts unless requested by OMB).

1
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 1 of 12

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 20

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 20 Filed 04/19/2006 Page 12 of 12
Before the First Division,

March 7, 1946

No. 50935.

#### Protest 107238-K of Maryland Distillers Products Co. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

The sole question before the court was whether these glass containers are bottles or demijohns within the meaning of those terms as used in the tariff act, there being no proof of a commercial meaning differing from the common meaning. It was held that the containers in question, having straight sides and a fiat bottom, not being enclosed in wickerwork and having no handles, are not demijohns as that term is defined in the dictionaries and as described by the court in *United States*v. *Ninety Demijohns of Rum*(8 Fed. 485, 487). On the record it was found that the glass containers are bottles and, as such, properly dutiable at one-sixth of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 217, by virtue of paragraph 810, and T. D. 50797.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KATHY IRIZARRY, :

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION

: NO. 02-CV-04412

HENRY MEARIG, INC., :

Defendant :

:

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 11th day of September, 2002, it is ORDERED that a

[X] scheduling conference 

[ ] settlement conference

[ ] status conference

in the above-captioned case will be held on September 18, 2002 at 2 p.m. before the Honorable Cynthia

M. Rufe. This conference will be held

[x] in chambers, Room 4000

[ ] by telephone* 

*Counsel for the plaintiff will be responsible for contacting all parties, at which

time you may contact Judge Rufe's chambers at (267)-299-7490.

If trial counsel is on trial in a court of record prior to the time of the conference, the Judge and

opposing counsel should be advised of this in writing at the earliest possible date. Another attorney in

such trial counsel's office, who should be as familiar as is feasible with the case, have authority from the

client, and an evaluation of the case for settlement purposes, should appear at the conference.

Failure to comply with this directive may result in the imposition of sanctions. The conference

will be continued to another date only under exceptional circumstances. 

BY THE COURT:

 ________________________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. 

 

Case 2:02-cv-04412-CMR Document 4 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 3
SCHEDULING INFORMATION REPORT

(To be completed and returned to Judge Rufe’s

Chambers three (3) days before the pretrial conference)

Caption: 

Civil Action No.: 

Jury Trial Non-Jury Trial Arbitration 

Plaintiff’s Counsel: 

Address: 

Phone: Fax: 

Defendant’s Counsel: 

Address: 

Phone: Fax: 

Have you complied with the duty of self-executing disclosure under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

26(a)?

 When? If not, why? 

 

Have you filed a discovery plan pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f)?

 When? If not, why? 

 

Discovery completed? If not, when? 

If you contend the discovery period should exceed four months after the last appearance by all

defendants is filed, please state reasons:

 

Case 2:02-cv-04412-CMR Document 4 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 2 of 3
Ready for trial by: 

 Date

Is a settlement conference likely to be helpful? 

If so, when: Early (yes/no) After discovery 

Do you expect to file a case dispositive motion? 

 

If so, by what date? 

Trial time estimate: 

Time to present your case: 

Time for entire trial: 

Date: 

Signature of counsel preparing the form

 

Typed or printed name

Case 2:02-cv-04412-CMR Document 4 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 3 of 3
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000Draft&K000000 Bulletin No. 2017-04	&"Arial,Bold"VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 03-02-17
Case 2:04-cv-00571-FCD-GGH   Document 23    Filed 05/26/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-26T19:00:41-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 80763]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25615]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--ASTM International

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 26, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), ASTM International 
(``ASTM'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions 
or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications 
were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting 
the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified 
circumstances. Specifically, ASTM has provided an updated list of 
current, ongoing ASTM activities originating between May 14, 2023 and 
September 14, 2023 designated as Work Items. A complete listing of ASTM 
Work Items, along with a brief description of each, is available at 
http://www.astm.org.
    On September 15, 2004, ASTM filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 10, 2004 (69 FR 65226).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 22, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 16, 2023 (88 FR 39479).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-25615 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2024 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-11	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/23/23
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUNGARD RECOVERY SERVICES,

L.P.,

 Plaintiff ,

 v.

DELTANET, INC.,

 Defendant.

 

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4445

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 26th day of September , 2002, it having been reported that the issues

between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to

the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, it is ORDERED that the above

action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04445-MK Document 11 Filed 09/26/2002 Page 1 of 1