alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.15


Table of Contents

 Exhibit 4.15 

 [THE COCA-COLA COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

 June 2, 2008 

 Coca-Cola FEMSA de Panamá, S.A. 

República de Panamá 

 Dear Sirs: 

 In regards to the Bottler Agreement in force and effect since November 1, 1994 (“the Agreement”) entered into between you and The Coca-Cola Company (the “Company”), we inform you that a new bottler agreement is in the final
  stages of discussion and approval among the parties, which we estimate will be executed towards the middle of September 2008, hereby the Agreement is temporarily extended from March 31, 2008 until:

 September 30, 2008 

 With the exception of said extension, all the terms and conditions of the Agreement will continue to be fully valid until the expiration of the additional term, and once the extension expires, the Bottler will no longer have the right to claim a
  tacit renewal of the aforementioned Agreement. 

 

 

		
	 	 Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ 
	 	 
	 	Authorized Representative 




 

 

		
	 Accepted by: 	 
	 COCA-COLA FEMSA DE PANAMÁ, S.A. 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ 	 
	 	 
	Authorized Representative
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-1772

:

v. :

:

MARCEL HARPER : CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 05-170-02

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 24th day of June, 2010, upon consideration of Marcel Harper’s pro se

Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Crim. Docket No. 419) and all documents filed in connection

therewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED. As Harper has failed to make

a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, there is no basis for the issuance of a

certificate of appealability. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova

 

John R. Padova, J.
June 22, 1943

No. 48416.

Suit *4420.*

#### *Adolph Goldmark & Sons Corp.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 687 affirmed May 3, 1943. C. A. D. 241.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold"VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2018
No. 67801.

#### Empire Findings Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/14942 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of percussion hammers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arthur Salm, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 68, C.D. 2235), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed March 17, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-451 Lower Tribunal No. F82-18361

________________ 

### Eddie Dean Hill, Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marisa Tinkler Mendez, Judge. Eddie Dean Hill, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, HENDON, and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Edwin A. Miller, certify that: 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Infodata Systems Inc.; 

2.              Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement          of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the          statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were          made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

3.              Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information          included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the          financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as          of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4.              The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for          establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in          Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

a)              designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material          information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,          is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the          period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

b)              evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and          procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual          report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

c)              presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the          disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation          Date; 

5.              The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on          our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit          committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the          equivalent functions): 

a)              all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls          which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,          summarize and report financial data and have identified for the          registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and 

b)              any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees          who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

6.              The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this          annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in          other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to          the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with          regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

Date:   March 30, 2004

/s/ Edwin A. Miller
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Brad A. Luecke, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Midwest BancHoldings, Inc.; 2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15 (e)) for the registrantand have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) [intentionally omitted] c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5) The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 9, 2004
 /s/ Brad A. Luecke
# C_2017022EN.01000401.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Apelacyjny w Gdańsku (Poland) lodged on 4 October 2016 — Stefan Czerwiński v Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Gdańsku

(Case C-517/16)

(2017/C 022/06)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Apelacyjny w Gdańsku

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Stefan Czerwiński

Appellant:

Respondent: Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych Oddział w Gdańsku

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| (1) | Can the classification, made by a Member State in a declaration submitted pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, of a particular benefit as concerning a specific branch of social security referred to in Article 3 of that regulation be subject to assessment by a national authority or court? |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Can the classification, made by a Member State in a declaration submitted pursuant to Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, of a particular benefit as concerning a specific branch of social security referred to in Article 3 of that regulation be subject to assessment by a national authority or court?

| (2) | Does a bridging pension arising under the Polish Law of 19 December 2008 on bridging pensions (Dziennik Ustaw of 2015, item 965, as subsequently amended) constitute an old-age benefit within the meaning of Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 883/2004? |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Does a bridging pension arising under the Polish Law of 19 December 2008 on bridging pensions (Dziennik Ustaw of 2015, item 965, as subsequently amended) constitute an old-age benefit within the meaning of Article 3(1)(d) of Regulation No 883/2004?

Dziennik Ustaw

| (3) | Does the exclusion — in relation to pre-retirement benefits — of the principle of aggregation of periods of insurance (Article 66 of Regulation No 883/2004 and recital 33 thereof) perform a protective function in the field of social security arising from Article 48(a) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union? |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Does the exclusion — in relation to pre-retirement benefits — of the principle of aggregation of periods of insurance (Article 66 of Regulation No 883/2004 and recital 33 thereof) perform a protective function in the field of social security arising from Article 48(a) of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union?

---
Exhibit
23.1







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Forms S-8 (File No. 33-14776, effective June 3, 1987, File No. 33-27530,
effective March 17, 1989, File No. 33-59035, effective May 2, 1995,
File No. 333-10045, effec­tive August 13, 1996, File No. 333-10047,
effective August 13, 1996, File No. 333-79427, effective May 27, 1999,
File No. 333-37380, effective May 19, 2000, File No. 333-68228, effective
August 23, 2001, File No. 333-83452, effective Febru­ary 27, 2002
and File No. 333-112648, effective February 10, 2004) and Forms S-3 (No.
333-106734, effective July 22, 2003 and File No. 333-121981, effective
January 12, 2005) of Innovex Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated
December 19, 2008 relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule which appear in this form 10-K. Our report contains an explanatory
regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.







/s/ BDO
SEIDMAN LLP








Milwaukee,
Wisconsin


December
22, 2008















75
1

PENNA, GRABOIS & ASSOCIATES

BY: MARSHALL L. GRABOIS, ESQUIRE 

Attorney I.D. # 17170 Attorney for Plaintiffs

166 East Butler Avenue

Ambler, Pennsylvania 19002

(215) 643-7866

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT, PENNSYVANIA

CATHERINE MOLA AND :

AND JOHN MOLA, HER HUSBAND : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

937 Davis Grove Road :

Horsham, PA 19044 :

: No. 02 CV 4392

v :

:

GAETANO J. GIORDANO :

22 Eagle Road :

Turnersville, New Jersey 03352 :

PLAINTIFFS' AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE UPON DEFENDANT FOR

COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION

COMES NOW, the undersigned attorney for Plaintiffs in the above captioned matter

who deposes and says that he served a copy of the Summons, Complaint, Case Management

Track Designation Form and Civil Cover Sheet upon the Defendant, Gaetano J. Giordano, by

sending him said documents by United States Postal Service, Certified Mail, Return Receipt

Requested, to his address as appears below, on July 2, 2002; and said documents were received

by the Defendant's agent on July 6, 2002, as reflected upon the United States Postal Service

Return Receipt signed by said agent for Defendant. The letter of service to Defendant and a copy

of the signed return receipt being attached hereto. This service being pursuant to Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure, Rule 4(e)(1), being proper service upon an out of state Defendant pursuant to

Case 2:02-cv-04392-JW Document 2 Filed 10/03/2002 Page 1 of 2
2

the Rules for service of process in the courts of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania where this

instant Federal District Court is located.

Gaetano J. Giordano

22 Eagle Road

Turnersville, New Jersey 08012

PENNA, GRABOIS & ASSOCIATES

_______________________________

Marshall L. Grabois, Esquire

Sworn to and subscribed before me,

a Notary for the Commonwealth of PA 

on the day of , 2002.

___________________________________

Notary

Case 2:02-cv-04392-JW Document 2 Filed 10/03/2002 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the December 31, 1998
Aquarion Company form 10-k and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                             654
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    11325
<ALLOWANCES>                                      1976
<INVENTORY>                                       4526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 41485
<PP&E>                                          493279
<DEPRECIATION>                                  146034
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  457480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            35486
<BONDS>                                         141380
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          7507
<OTHER-SE>                                      139333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    457480
<SALES>                                         115669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                115669
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    71308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               10507
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  34054
<INCOME-TAX>                                     14095
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              19959
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     19959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.62
        

</TABLE>
No. 64093.

protest 59/21904 (San Francisco).

#### Green Bros. *&*Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (a)

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Form 10-Q"), I, John Whetzell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

      (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d));
      and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

DATE: 11-14-03

/s/ JOHN S. WHETZELL
    -------------------------------
John S. Whetzell
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Before the Third Division,

May 21, 1968

No. P68/243.

protests 60/22298-15901, etc. (New Orleans).

No. P68/244.

protests 64/3306-16287, etc. (New Orleans).

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States, United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

Landis, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *W. Kay*Company, *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

October 26, 1960

No. 64817.

#### Schmid Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 304682-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GORDON ROY PARKER : CIVIL ACTION

a/k/a RAY GORDON, :

d/b/a SNODGRASS PUBLISHING :

GROUP :

:

v. :

:

LEARN THE SKILLS CORP., :

et al. : NO. 05-2752

ORDER

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

(1) the motion for reconsideration of plaintiff Gordon

Roy Parker (Doc. No. 59) is DENIED; and

(2) the cross-motion for sanctions of defendant Learn

the Skills Corporation (Doc. No. 60) is DENIED without prejudice. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III 

 C.J.

Case 2:05-cv-02752-HB Document 62 Filed 08/31/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 05-363-4

vs. : 

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-4139

PEDRO RISQUET, :

Defendant. :

__________________________________________:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of November 2011, upon consideration of Petitioner Pedro

Risquet’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2255 (Doc.

No. 433), the Government’s response thereto (Doc. No. 446), and Petitioner’s Reply (Doc. No.

454), after a review of the record in this case, and for the reasons stated in the Opinion filed this

day, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Petitioner’s Motion is DENIED;

2. The Court finds no ground upon which to issue a certificate of appeal, as

Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right; and 1

3. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Hon. Cynthia M. Rufe

__________________________

HON. CYNTHIA M. RUFE

See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE ANNUAL
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          13,246
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,721
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                      6,529
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,907
<PP&E>                                           4,348
<DEPRECIATION>                                     819
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  29,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,590
<BONDS>                                          2,665
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,584
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    29,681
<SALES>                                         10,121
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,961
<CGS>                                            7,636
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,256
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    10
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 517
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,822)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,822)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,822)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.44)


</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1446 

To reauthorize the Historically Black Colleges and Universities Historic 

Preservation program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 27, 2017 

Ms. HARRIS (for herself and Mr. GRAHAM) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To reauthorize the Historically Black Colleges and 

Universities Historic Preservation program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVER4 SITIES HISTORIC PRESERVATION PROGRAM 

5 REAUTHORIZED. 

6 Section 507(d)(2) of the Omnibus Parks and Public 

7 Lands Management Act of 1996 (54 U.S.C. 302101 note) 

8 is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

9 ‘‘and each of fiscal years 2018 through 2024.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS