alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**


**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Family Room Entertainment Corporation,
      a
      New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June
      30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
      I, George Furla, Chief Executive Officer of the Company do each hereby certify,
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
      the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
      October 20, 2006





/s/
                George FurlaChief
                Executive Officer
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/18/21
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1397 

To nullify any generalized, routine or ongoing reporting requirement imposed 

on a person licensed under section 923 of title 18, United States Code, 

that is based on the geographic location in which the licensee is located 

or on the sale of multiple rifles or shotguns, or any specific type of 

rifle or shotgun, to the same person. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2017 

Mr. STRANGE (for himself, Mr. CRUZ, and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To nullify any generalized, routine or ongoing reporting requirement imposed on a person licensed under section 

923 of title 18, United States Code, that is based on 

the geographic location in which the licensee is located 

or on the sale of multiple rifles or shotguns, or any 

specific type of rifle or shotgun, to the same person. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting the Second 

5 Amendment Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1397 IS

1 SEC. 2. NULLIFICATION OF ANY GENERALIZED, ROUTINE 

2 OR ONGOING REPORTING REQUIREMENT IM3 POSED ON A PERSON LICENSED UNDER SEC4 TION 923 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE, 

5 THAT IS BASED ON THE GEOGRAPHIC LOCA6 TION IN WHICH THE LICENSEE IS LOCATED 

7 OR ON THE SALE OF MULTIPLE RIFLES OR 

8 SHOTGUNS, OR ANY SPECIFIC TYPE OF RIFLE 

9 OR SHOTGUN, TO THE SAME PERSON. 

10 No person licensed under section 923 of title 18, 

11 United States Code, shall be subject to any generalized, 

12 routine or ongoing reporting requirement based on the ge13 ographic location in which the licensee is located or on 

14 the sale of multiple rifles or shotguns, or any specific type 

15 of rifle or shotgun, to the same person. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
### TEXAS COURT OF AP ` PEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03
- 23
- 00077
- CV

Norman Engel , Appellant

v. Texas Department of Insurance
- Division of Workers’ Compensation and Commissioner Cassie Brown, in Her Official Capacity; The State of Texas and the Atto rney General of the State of Texas by and through Ken Paxton in His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the State of Texas; and Illinois National Insurance Company , Appellee s

FROM THE 53RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D
- 1
- GN
- 19
- 001342 , THE H O NORABLE KARIN CRUMP , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due for filing in this Court on March 13,
2023

. On March 14, 2023 , we notified appellant that no clerk’s r ecord had b e en filed due to his failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the trial clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice requested that appellant make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status
report rega rding this appeal by Marc h 2 4 , 2023

. Further, the notice advised appellant that his failure to comply with this request could result in the dismissal of the appeal for want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a status re port or otherwise responded to this
Court’s no t ic e , and the clerk’s record has not been filed.

If a trial

- court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to an appellant’s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay for the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court2

may dismiss the ap p ea l for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). In this case, appellant has not established
that he is entitled to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145 . B e ca u se appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

____________ ______________________________ J. Woodfin Jones , Justice
Before Justices Bake r , Smith, and Jones *
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: April 21, 2023

* Before J. Woo dfin Jones, Chief Justice (Re tir e d), T hird Court of Appeals, si tting b y assignment

. See Tex. Gov ’ t C ode § 74.003( b).
No. 60769.

#### Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 198533-K (New York).

*506Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of table lighters similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59275, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 8622)

Entry No. 829510, etc.

#### Joseph Markovits, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided July 6, 1956)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto

> That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, cover artificial flowers, fruits, leaves, stems or parts thereof, or articles wholly or in chief value of the same imported from Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States was the appraised value less the amount added at the time of entry to make market value, packing included.

> That on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these cases be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the amounts added at the time of entry to make market value, packing included.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 24

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 55 Att. 2

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-3 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 24 of 24
# RC INVASION INT’L INC.

**DJI PHANTOM 3 PROFESSIONAL PRE -**  **FLIGHT CHECK LIST. 1.**  **Ground check prior to flight, includes checking battery level both on Drone and Radio check levels show as charged**  **. 2.**  **Check communication between Radio and Drone. 3.**  **Once connected Calibrate GPS prior to any flight this will assure**  **a safe return of the Drone during a low battery level or loss of signal.**  **4. Check GPS signals and only fly with a minimum**  **of 12 sat e**  **l lites.**  **5. Check signal and any message reading restricted zone on flight**  **scree n. Refrain from flight if you get restricted zone. “You are in**  **a restricted zone or within an airport proximity of 5 miles” DO**  **NOT FLY! 6.**  **Drone is not to be flown above 200 feet in altitude at any time. 7.**  **VFR visual flight Rules pertain to every flight. 8.**  **If its foggy, raining or high winds DRONE is not to be flown and**  **put at risk the safety of people and or properties. 9.**  **Only fly in clear un -** **obstructed areas.** 

# 91.13
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          47,331
<SECURITIES>                                    25,043
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,033
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                         31
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                88,029
<PP&E>                                           6,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,638
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  98,176
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,592
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           151
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,110
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    98,176
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,030
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,666
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,618
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,863
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,863
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .26
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 21, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 81093]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Advisory Board and NCI Board of Scientific Advisors, November 
29, 2023, 05:30 p.m. to November 30, 2023, 05:30 p.m., National Cancer 
Institute--Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Room TE406 & 408, 
Rockville, MD, 20850 which was published in the Federal Register on 
September 29, 2023, FR Doc 2023-21441, 88 FR 67328.
    This meeting notice is being amended to change the meeting format 
from hybrid (in-person & virtual) to virtual only. In addition, the 
National Cancer Advisory Board (NCAB) Subcommittee Meeting on November 
29, 2023, will now be held from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. instead of 5:30 
p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The closed session of the NCAB on November 30, 2023, 
will now be held from 12:00 p.m. to 1:05 p.m. instead of 4:30 p.m. to 
5:30 p.m. The open session of the NCAB and NCI Board of Scientific 
Advisors (BSA) on November 30, 2023, will now be held from 1:15 p.m. to 
5:00 p.m. instead of 8:00 a.m. to 4:15 p.m. The NCAB Subcommittee 
meeting and open session of the NCAB and BSA can be accessed from the 
NIH VideoCasting at the following link: https://videocast.nih.gov/. The 
meeting is partially closed to the public.

    Dated: November 15, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-25677 Filed 11-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                1,673
<SECURITIES>                                          5,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        24,503
<ALLOWANCES>                                            688
<INVENTORY>                                          21,571
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     56,578
<PP&E>                                              112,475
<DEPRECIATION>                                       17,955
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      167,680
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                50,281
<BONDS>                                              21,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                597
<OTHER-SE>                                           95,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        167,680
<SALES>                                             164,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    164,462
<CGS>                                               139,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       139,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        124
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3,193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (15,570)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (4,515)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (11,054)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (11,054)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.75)



</TABLE>
# C_2017022EN.01001301.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Irinodikio Lerou (Greece) lodged on 9 Νοvember 2016 — Alessandro Saponaro and Kalliopi-Chloi Xylina

(Case C-565/16)

(2017/C 022/19)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Irinodikio Lerou (Greece)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Alessandro Saponaro and Kalliopi-Chloi Xylina

Applicant:

Question referred

Question referred

In the event that a petition for leave to renounce an inheritance is brought before a Greek court by the parents of a minor child who is habitually resident in Italy, is it the case that, if there is to be a valid prorogation of jurisdiction under Article 12(3)(b) of Regulation No 2201/2003 (1): (a) the unequivocal agreement to the prorogation by the parents is demonstrated by merely the lodging of the application before the Greek court, (b) the prosecutor before the first instance courts is one of the parties who must agree to the prorogation at the time of the lodging of the application, given that under Greek law he is legally a party to the relevant proceedings, (c) the prorogation of jurisdiction is in the best interests of the child, given that the child and the applicants, who are the child’s parents, are habitually resident in Italy, while the place of residence of the person from whom property is inherited at the time of his death was Greece and the property inherited is in Greece.

1

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).

1

---
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the annual report of Industrial Development Bank of
Israel Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Uri Galili, General Manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Uri Galili
--------------
Name: Uri Galili
Title: General Manager
Date: September 20, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MULTI-GLASS INTERNATIONAL

CORP. : CIVIL ACTION

:

: NO. 02-4408

 VS. : 

:

REFRACTORY & INSULATION

SUPPLY CORP., ET AL

 ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th of JULY, 2002, in accordance with the

court’s procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby, 

 ORDERED that the above captioned case is reassigned from the

calendar of the Honorable Herbert J. Hutton to the Honorable William H. Yohn, Jr.

FOR THE COURT:

 

JAMES T. GILES

Chief Judge

ATTEST:

 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ

Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MLEA, INC. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 02-4393 

:

ATLANTIC RECYCLED RUBBER INC. :

 et al. :

ORDER

And now this 16th of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that a Status/Settlement

Conference will be held in the above-captioned matter on August 9, 2005, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom

TBA (parties to call chambers the day before). 

BY THE COURT:

 

 Juan R. Sánchez, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04393-JS Document 47 Filed 06/16/2005 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.2






CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                     OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Steven C. Preston, the Chief Financial Officer of The ServiceMaster  Company,
certify that (i) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2003,  fully  complies  with  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained in such Form
10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                             /S/ STEVEN C. PRESTON
                             ----------------------
                             Steven C. Preston
                             Chief Financial Officer
                             May 15, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster  Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.








                                       23
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alister Cowan, Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:February 18, 2009



|                                        
|----------------------------------------
|/s/    ALISTER
COWAN                    
|Alister Cowan                           
|Vice President & Chief Financial Officer