alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION VII

901 NORTH 5TH STREET

KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101

July 21, 2010

Dear Owner/Resident:

RUBIN WILLIAMS

OMAHA, NE 68111

2557 FOWLER AVE

RE: 2557 FOWLER AV SAID: 671

 A Lead Based Paint (LBP) assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) as part of the Omaha Lead Superfund Site investigation. The purpose of this assessment 

is to determine whether a significant quantity of lead based paint is present on the exterior surface of structures, 

there deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc.) exist that might increase lead concentrations in 

the yard above acceptable levels.

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at (402) 731-3045.

Enclosure

Sincerely,

Robert Feild

Project Coordinator

Superfund Division

 As requested, enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 2557 FOWLER AV along with a LBP Fact Sheet. 

The EPA is currently developing paint stabilization eligibility criteria and at this time can not identify which homes 

will ultimately be eligible for EPA-funded paint stabilization. At present, paint stabilization is being offered at only 

those households with the most severe LPB problems, particularly where children under the age of 7 reside. The 

EPA stresses the importance of maintaining painted surfaces where any amount of LBP is present. The LBP Fact 

Sheet provides information pertaining to the EPA's Exterior LBP Response Program. Once the eligibility criterion is 

finalized (and if your property qualifies) a representative from EPA or the Omaha Lead Hazard Control Program 

(LHCP) will contact you to arrange for paint stabilization at your property.

 Exposure to lead contamination can adversely affect the development and behavior of young children. If you 

have children less than seven years of age living in your home, we strongly recommend that you contact your doctor 

or the Douglas County Health Department at (402) 444-7825 and arrange to have their blood tested.

Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045.

 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment
Omaha Lead Site LBP Assessment 

LEGEND: H - N - P - 01 - 671 

( I I -BYID Number 

1 - Sample Number 

Material, P = Paint 

-Side of Structure N = North S = South E = East W = West 

1 -Structure Type H = House G = Garage S = Shed F = Fence 

Sample Number 

Samples Analyzed 

XRF Unit: Book: IB~ 

Date: Gfl3/ud Time: jb:o 

Staff:ntS /m / 

/ I -' 

Lead Loading StructurelFeature Substrate Color Deteriorated 

(Window, siding, porch, etc.) (Wood, concrete, etc.) Area 

Lev LBP-I I Pruaed L12112lr;lX 15 16 11 11447111 111 23 
ALT: 

- - 

Omaha Lead Site 

Site Sketch 

LBP Assessment 

North Arrow 

I 

I' I I 

Plan View - Indicate number of stories and wrimeter dimensions of structure I1 

lndicate regions of deteriorstion and describe 

(Deterioration could include surfaces that are worn due to friction, checking, cracking and flaking, alligatoring, blistering and/or peeling) 

4 

~~ ---~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -.
No. 64072.

protests 117037-K, etc. (New York).

#### Empire Liquor Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

- against -

DAVID FORREST and T. BEAUCLERC ROGERS IV,

Defendants.

Civil Action

No. 02-CV-4435

DECLARATION OF STUART COTTON

I, STUART COTTON, declare as follows:

1. I am a partner in the law firm of Mound, Cotton, Wollan & Greengrass,

One Battery Park Plaza, New York, New York 10004. I am counsel of record for New

Hampshire Insurance Company in litigation arising out of the financing of the film “It Had To Be

You.” I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this Declaration and, if called as a

witness, could and would testify competently to such facts under oath.

2. I submit this declaration in support of the opposition of Lexington

Insurance Company (“Lexington”) to the motions of T. Beauclerc Rogers IV (“Rogers”) and

David Forrest (“Forrest”) to dismiss or stay prosecution of the Complaint filed in this Court by

Lexington against them.

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 19-2 Filed 12/24/2002 Page 1 of 2
-2-

3. The film “It Had To Be You” was financed by a California bank, Silicon

Valley Bank (“SVB”) and litigation relating to an insurance policy issued with respect to this

film was brought by SVB in California (but has now been resolved). Many of the individuals

who have relevant knowledge pertaining to the insurance aspects of this film and who were

deposed in the litigation or were scheduled to be deposed are United States-based and, in

particular, California-based. These individuals include various SVB employees (Carole Diane

Lemay, Paul Wyckoff), the film’s producer (Neil Kaplan), sales representatives (Gene George,

Ian Jessel), the insurers’ “designee” (Martin Fink) and the Completion Guarantor (Steve

Ransohoff).

/s/ Stuart Cotton

Stuart Cotton

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 19-2 Filed 12/24/2002 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Drug Enforcement Administration 

                    By Notice dated November 21, 2006 and published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on December 1, 2006, (71 FR 69591), JFC Technologies LLC., 100 West Main Street, P.O. Box 669, Bound Brook, New Jersey 08805, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of Meperidine intermediate-B (9233), a basic class of controlled substance listed in schedule II.                 

The company plans to import the basic class of controlled substance for production of controlled substances for distribution to its customers. 

                    No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. § 823(a) and § 952(a) and determined that the registration of JFC Technologies LLC to import the basic class of controlled substance is consistent with the public interest and with United States obligations under international treaties, conventions, or protocols in effect on May 1, 1971, at this time. DEA has investigated JFC Technologies LLC to ensure that the company's registration is consistent with the public interest. The investigation has included inspection and testing of the company's physical                           ( print page 8018)                        security systems, verification of the company's compliance with state and local laws, and a review of the company's background and history. Therefore, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 952(a) and § 958(a), and in accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34, the above named company is granted registration as an importer of the basic class of controlled substance listed.                 

Dated: February 14, 2007. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement Administration. 

 [FR Doc. E7-2991 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4019 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide regular updates to Livestock Indemnity Program payment rates to reflect market prices, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Agriculture to provide regular 

updates to Livestock Indemnity Program payment rates 

to reflect market prices, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Livestock Indemnity 

5 Program Improvement Act of 2024’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LIVESTOCK INDEMNITY PAYMENTS. 

7 Section 1501(b)(2) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 

8 (7 U.S.C. 9081(b)(2)) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4019 IS

1 (1) by redesignating subparagraphs (A) and 

2 (B) as clauses (i) and (ii), respectively, and indent3 ing appropriately; 

4 (2) in the matter preceding clause (i) (as so 

5 designated), by striking ‘‘Indemnity’’ and inserting 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Indemnity’’; and 

8 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(B) DETERMINATION OF MARKET

10 VALUE.—The Secretary shall determine the 

11 market value described in subparagraph (A)— 

12 ‘‘(i) in coordination with the Adminis13 trator of the Agricultural Marketing Serv14 ice; 

15 ‘‘(ii) using other appropriate re16 sources, as determined by the Secretary; 

17 and 

18 ‘‘(iii) on a quarterly basis.’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Before the Third Division,

June 13, 1963

No. 67816.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/10997 (New York).

*329Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earthenware eggcups similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 8, C.D. 2226), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Anticipated

Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/ End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Year

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Nonfed

Trading 

Prtnr

Trading 

Partner 

Main

PY

Adj DEFC

Pgm 

Rpt 

Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type BOC Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account 

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

417400 Transfers - Current-Year Borrowing Authority Converted to 

Cash

N B D E D/C P/X D/M F ### #### B/P/X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D EG/EP/ES E/F/U N U/E X/K/N

439502 Authority Unavailable for Obligation Pursuant to Public Law - 

Temporary - Anticipated Current-Year Authority

Y B C E C D/P/R

/S

D/M 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D EG/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U N U X/N

439730 Appropriations Temporarily Precluded From Obligation N B C B/E D/C D B/P/X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D ES E/F/U N U X/N

U S S G L A C C O U N T USSGL ATTRIBUTES B U L K F I L E A T T R I B U T E S T A S A T T R I B U T E S

Fiscal Year 2023 Reporting

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Attribute Table

Section IV

Bulletin No. 2023-04

Draft

IRC Handout Feb. 15, 2023
EXHIBIT 99.2





        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350
              OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Steven C. Preston, the chief financial officer of The ServiceMaster  Company,
certify that that (i) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended
June 30, 2002, fully complies with requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained in such Form
10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.









                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                     Steven C. Preston
                                                     August 13, 2002





                                       26
<PAGE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DIANE DUNCAN,

NO. CIV. S-04-523 LKK/PAN (JFM)

Plaintiff,

v. ORDER RE DISPOSAL

DOCUMENTS AFTER

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., NOTIFICATION OF SETTLEMENT

Defendants.

 /

Counsel for the parties have informed the court that the

parties have settled the above-captioned case. The court now

orders that the dispositional documents disposing of the case be

filed no later than sixty (60) days from the effective date of this

order.

All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter, including the

Pretrial Conference and trial, are hereby VACATED.

////

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-00523-LKK -EFB Document 104 Filed 08/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY BE GROUNDS FOR THE

IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON ANY AND ALL COUNSEL OR PARTIES WHO

CONTRIBUTED TO THE VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: August 4, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-00523-LKK -EFB Document 104 Filed 08/04/06 Page 2 of 2
2000 QUESTIONNAIRE

Census 2000 used two questionnaires—a long-form

(sample) and a short-form (100 percent) questionnaire.

The short-form questionnaire consisted of 7 questions

that could be answered by up to 6 persons within a household (see questions 1-6 and 33 on long-form questionnaire

reproduced here). Space was provided to identify 6 additional members of the household. The U.S. Census Bureau

would collect data on persons 7-12 by telephone interview.

The long-form questionnaire (pictured here), sent to a

sample of households throughout the United States and

territories, contained 29 inquiries in addition to the 8

questions asked on the short-form questionnaire. These

additional quesitons, as in the past, collected information

on the population, housing, economic, and social characteristics of the Nation’s households.

Measuring America 97

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

98 Measuring America

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

Measuring America 99

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

100 Measuring America

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

Measuring America 101

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

102 Measuring America

U.S. Census Bureau
Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 4 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 4 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 4 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 4 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 4 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 4 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 4 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 7 of 7
W:\FORMS\.FRM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIGUEL ANGEL DIAZ :

:

 vs. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4454 

 

:

JOHN ASHCROFT, ET AL :

 

REPORT OF PRETRIAL OR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE

 On this 10TH day of FEBRUARY, 2003, a [ X] Pretrial 

[ ] Settlement Conference was held before Judge J. Curtis Joyner.

 

REMARKS: 

 ______________________________

 Angela Mickie 

 Deputy Clerk to Judge Joyner 

Civ 14 (8/80)

Case 2:02-cv-04454-JCJ Document 11 Filed 02/27/2003 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18. U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                -------------------------------------------------
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that
this  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended March 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                            By: /s/ Gary C. Loraditch
                                -------------------------------------
                                Name:    Gary C. Loraditch
                                Title:   President



                            By: /s/ Bonnie M. Klein
                                -------------------------------------
                                Name:    Bonnie M. Klein
                                Title:   Vice President and Treasurer

Date: May 8, 2003
CERTIFICATION
OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS
  
 I,
Steven J. Cohen, Chief Executive Officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., an Illinois
corporation (the "Registrant"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
the Report on Form 10-Q for the period of the Registrant from January 1, 2010
through March 31, 2010 (the "Report") which this statement accompanies
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  
 
 Dated:  May
21, 2010
 By                 /s/ Steven J.
Cohen
 Steven J. Cohen
 President and Director
 
 A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4234 — Carlson/One Equity Partners/Carlson Wagonlit)

(2006/C 246/21)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 3 July 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
M14004 – Chemical 2

Part II, Section A.2 and A.3 – Industrial Sites Con trolled by Submitter Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release and Disposal Page 1 of 1



## CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IRWIN ERIC GARCIA :

 : CIVIL ACTION

:

:

v. :

: NO. 05-CV-3479

:

JOHN A. PALAKOVICH, ET AL. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 8 day of June, 2006, upon consideration of the Petition For Writ Of th

Habeas Corpus, after review of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 22) prepared by

Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa,, and no objections having been filed thereto, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendations is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice. 

3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. 

4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s R BARCLAY SURRICK

_____________________

R. Barclay Surrick, Judge

Case 2:05-cv-03479-RBS Document 26 Filed 06/08/06 Page 1 of 1
#### Rosan VENEGAS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MADERA COUNTY, a public entity; Madera County Board of Supervisors; Bill O’Brian, an individual and as an agent of County of Madera, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-17420.

D.C. No. CV-98-05994-AWI/SMS.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 9, 2001.

Decided May 3, 2001.

*486Before BEEZER, O’SCANNLAIN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM *

Rosan Venegas appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Madera County, Madera County Board of Supervisors and Bill O’Brian (collectively, “County”) on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. She argues that the court (1) improperly concluded that she did not have a property interest in her continued County employment, which would entitle her to a due process hearing; (2) incorrectly found that her claimed liberty interest was not violated when County terminated her employment based on false theft charges; and (3) improperly determined that County afforded her adequate due process by giving her an opportunity to refute the charges and clear her name.

We have jurisdiction, 12 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, *Weiner v. San Diego County,*210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000), and may affirm on any ground supported by the record, *Lujan v. Pacific Maritime Ass’n,*165 F.3d 738, 741 (9th Cir.1999).

With respect to Venegas’ claim that she has a constitutionally protected interest in her continued County employment, Venegas has failed to establish a legitimate claim of entitlement to such a benefit. *See Bd. of Regents v. Roth,*408 U.S. 564, 577, 92 S.Ct. 2701, 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); *Llamas v. Butte Cmty. Coll. Dist.,*238 F.3d *4871123, 1128 (9th Cir.2001). Neither the holding in *McGillicuddy v. Civil Service Commission,*133 Cal.App. 782, 24 P.2d 942 (1933), nor Venegas’ references to the California Constitution and Labor Code furnish a basis for establishing a property interest under the facts of this case. Venegas admitted in her deposition testimony that (1) she knew her position was temporary and part-time; (2) she knew she was ineligible to apply for a permanent position until she passed the required written examination; and (3) she had no cause to believe that her supervisor had the authority to exempt her from the examination and make her position permanent. These admissions defeat her claim of entitlement based on “mutually explicit understandings .” *See Perry v. Sindermann,*408 U.S. 593, 600-02, 92 S.Ct. 2694, 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972).

Although dismissal based on a charge of theft is sufficient to implicate liberty interests, *Vanelli v. Reynolds Sch. Dist. No. 7,*667 F.2d 773, 777 (9th Cir.1982), Venegas has not shown that her liberty interest was violated. County satisfied the requirements of due process by affording Venegas an opportunity to refute the charge and clear her name in the Special Incident Report. *See Bd. of Regents,*408 U.S. at 573 n.12, 92 S.Ct. 2701.

AFFIRMED.

*

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
No. 56350.

protests 168253-K, etc. (New York).

#### Abraham & Straus, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 47325.

#### Protests 14119-K, etc., of Pacific Customs Brokerage Co. (Detroit).

*367Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the lumber in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Seaboard Lumber Sales Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 161, C. D. 391). In accordance therewith it was held that the tax imposed should have been assessed on the basis of the condition in which imported and that no addition should have been made for planing, or tonguing and grooving.' Protests sustained to this extent.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 53-5 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 2

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 53 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 53-5 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 2 of 2