alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tongli
Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. for the period ended December 31, 2009, I, Li Li,
Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended December 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Tongli Pharmaceuticals (USA),
Inc.




Dated:
February 22, 2010




/s/ Li LiLi
      LiChief
      Financial Officer
17EXHIBIT 31(ii)CERTIFICATIONI, Richard M. Hewitt, CFO do hereby certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Local Telecom Systems, Inc2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of thisannual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based onour evaluation as of the Evaluation Date:5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, base on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls;and6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in thisannual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors thatcould significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.          Date: February 16, 2005       /s/Richard M. Hewitt         Richard M. Hewitt, Chief Financial Officer
** **

**Exhibit31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

 

 

I, Brian R. Ervine, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-Q of Evolving Systems, Inc.;

2. Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 (b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.       The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 15, 2004

 
| /s/ BRIAN R. ERVINE                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian R. Ervine                                                          |
| Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer |

 

----
**PERMANENT REDUCTION TO GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION**

**EFFECTIVE FISCAL YEAR 2019**

**PREPARED BY:**

**GENERAL LEDGER AND ADVISORY BRANCH**

**FISCAL ACCOUNTING**

**BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE**

**U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY**

Page 21 of 25

**August 2018**

Page 2 of 25

**August 2018**

**PERMANENT REDUCTION TO GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION**

**EFFECTIVE FISCAL 2019**

**PERMANENT REDUCTION TO GENERAL FUND APPROPRIATION**

**EFFECTIVE FISCAL 2019**

**Introduction**

General Fund appropriations are derived from the General Fund of the U.S. Government (General Fund) as specified in an Appropriations Act or Authorization Act (i.e. Mandatory Appropriation) and are posted to a Treasury Appropriation Symbol (TAS) by a Treasury warrant.  Similarly, a General Fund of the U.S. Government appropriation can be reduced by a Treasury warrant. For reductions against a General Fund Appropriation, the transactions are classified as permanent because the amount is returned to the General Fund of the U.S. Treasury whereas a temporary reduction is not returned to the General Fund of the U.S. Treasury.  

The following two USSGL accounts are highlighted in this scenario.

· 439200 Permanent Reduction - New Budget Authority

· 439300 Permanent Reduction - Prior-Year Balances

Rescissions and cancellations of the General Fund appropriations are considered to be permanent reductions unless the legislation clearly indicates that the reduction is temporary. Permanent reductions of General Fund appropriations revert back to the General Fund of the U.S. Government. Reductions of contract authority and borrowing authority are also usually permanent. (OMB Circular No. A-11 Section 20). Permanent reductions are recorded on distinct SF 133 and Budget Schedule P line numbers (OMB Circular No. A-11 Appendix F). For more information on how to record a reduction, please see OMB Circular No. A-11.

This scenario captures permanent reductions of the General Fund appropriations. For report presentation purposes, the fund in this scenario is considered discretionary and does not expire at the end of year 1 or 2.  In year 1, USSGL account 439200, “Permanent Reduction – New Budget Authority” is used to reflect a reduction of new budget authority provided to a general fund appropriation.  Similarly, a reduction of prior-year balances derived from a general fund appropriation is reflected in USSGL account 439300, “Permanent Reduction – Prior-Year Balances” in year 2.

**Listing of USSGL Accounts Used in This Scenario**

*For USSGL Account Definitions, please refer to the USSGL Treasury Financial Manual Supplement, Section II, Accounts and Definitions

*A beginning Trial Balance is not used in this scenario.*

**Year 1**

**Illustrative Transactions**

**Year 1 Closing Entries**

**Reclassified Statements**

**Year 2**

**Year 2**

**Year 2 Closing Entries**

**Reclassified Statements**

Page 25 of 25

**August 2018**
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersignedcertifies that this periodic report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thatinformation contained in this periodic report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of Versicor Inc.

 

 
| Date:  November 13, 2002 | /s/ GEORGE F. HORNER III                              |
|-------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                          | **George F. Horner III**                              |
|                          | *President and Chief Executive Officer*               |
|                          |                                                  |
|                          |                                                  |
| Date:  November 13, 2002 | /s/ DOV A. GOLDSTEIN, M.D.                            |
|                          | **Dov A. Goldstein, M.D.**                            |
|                          | *Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28 1 The “Doe” defendants are dismissed. See Status (Pretrial

Scheduling) Order filed April 19, 2004, at 2.

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES COLLINS, )

) CIV. S-04-43 GEB KJM

Plaintiff, )

)

v. )

) ORDER

CHLN, INC., a California corpora- )

tion, dba CHART HOUSE RESTAURANT, )

MAMMOTH MALL MANAGEMENT, INC., a )

California corporation,1 )

)

Defendants. )

)

The vague representations in this action that a partial

settlement is reached are too inconclusive to justify vacating the

remaining scheduling dates. Therefore, the final pretrial

conference is rescheduled for hearing on July 18, 2005, at 1:30

p.m. A joint pretrial statement is due fourteen days before the

conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: June 22, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Case 2:04-cv-00043-GEB -KJM Document 18 Filed 06/23/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00043-GEB -KJM Document 18 Filed 06/23/05 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**MBNA Technology, Inc.**

**BA            Credit Card Trust**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of MBNA Technology, Inc., a            wholly-owned subsidiary of FIA Card Services, National Association ("FIA"), pursuant to            the Service Agreement dated as of May 1, 1993 (as amended from time to time, the            "Agreement") by and between FIA (formerly known as MBNA America Bank, National            Association) and MBNA Technology, Inc. (formerly known as MBNA Information Services,            Inc.), does hereby certify that:

| 1. | MBNA Technology, Inc. performs certain data processing                            and administrative functions on behalf of FIA under the                            Agreement. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | A review of MBNA Technology, Inc.'s activities during                            the period from and including July 1, 2006 through and including June                            30, 2007 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under                            my supervision. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, MBNA                            Technology, Inc. has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material                            respects under the Agreement throughout such period. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate            this 14th day of September 2007.

 

| By:    /s/ Scott                            C.                            Reynolds                                          |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Name: Scott C. Reynolds

|   | Title: | Senior Vice President |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|

 

 

 

----
(Reap. Dec. 10979)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 20914.

(Decided May 13, 1965)

*Stein & Shostah*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases which is incorporated herein:

> 1. That on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, where the invoice unit values plus the f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission on said merchandise.

> 2. That all of the merchandise covered by all of the appeals for reappraisement the subject of this stipulation was entered subsequent to February 27, 1958.

> 3. That as to any of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule *658of Cases which, is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, 93 Treas. Dec. 14, issued January 20,1958, as provided for in Sec. 0(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress that there was no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> 4. That the footwear covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases is unlike any articles manufactured or produced in the United States.

> 5. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases may he deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and bold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) or 402a(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tlie Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values, plus f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
----

----

I Informacije

Komisija

----

SKUPNI KATALOG SORT POLJŠČIN

šesti dodatek k 24. dopolnjeni izdaji

(2006/C 272 A/01)

VSEBINA

Legenda

Seznam vrst poljščin

I.   Sladkorna pesa

II.   Krmne rastline

III.   Oljnice in predivnice

IV.   Žita

V.   Krompir

----

LEGENDA

----

(1)UL C 68 A, 21.3.2006, str. 1. Katalog, kakor je bil nazadnje spremenjen s petim dodatkom (UL C 193 A, 17.8.2006, str. 1).

(2)UL L 193, 20.7.2002, str. 1. Direktiva, kakor je bila nazadnje spremenjena z Uredbo (ES) št. 1829/2003 Evropskega parlamenta in Sveta (UL L 268, 18.10.2003, str. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

5.AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA L.

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

9.BROMUS CATHARTICUS VAHL

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

16A.× FESTULOLIUM

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

27.POA TRIVIALIS L.

30.LOTUS CORNICULATUS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

34.MEDICAGO LUPULINA L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

40.TRIFOLIUM HYBRIDUM L.

41.TRIFOLIUM INCARNATUM L.

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

44.TRIFOLIUM RESUPINATUM L.

45.TRIGONELLA FOENUM-GRAECUM L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

48.VICIA SATIVA L.

50.BRASSICA NAPUS L. VAR. NAPOBRASSICA (L.) RCHB.

51.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. ACEPHALA (DC.) ALEF. VAR. MEDULLOSA THELL. + VAR. VIRIDIS L.

52.PHACELIA TANACETIFOLIA BENTH.

53.RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. VAR. OLEIFORMIS PERS.

III

56.BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERNJ ET COSSON

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

58.BRASSICA NIGRA (L.) KOCH

59.CANNABIS SATIVA L.

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

65.PAPAVER SOMNIFERUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

73.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH

74.SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

75.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH × SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
From: 

Sent: 8/30/2005 9:47:16 AM

To: 

Dear Ms. Howard,

During our August 24, 2010 meeting at your office, the Vinyl Institute

displayed a data base that utilized concentrations from submitted data

per the Section 114 Request. EPA expressed an interest in obtaining

our data base. Please accept our apologies for the late submission of

this information, but our members wanted to be sure the information was

properly vetted before it was submitted for your consideration and use.

The attached letter provides additional support explanation about the

data base as well. We trust that EPA finds this information of

interest. Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions that

may arise.

Regards,

Richard Krock

Technical Director

The Vinyl Institute

1737 King Street Suite 390

Alexandria, VA 22314

Direct: 571.970.3392

Mobile: 571.216.4474

Fax: 571.970.3271

Email: rkrock@vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylinfo.org

http://www.vinylindesign.com(See attached file: VI Letter to EPA

Conveying PVC MACT Resin Test Concentrations 9 16 10.pdf)(See attached

file: Industry Wide Concentration Data Aggregation 09 16 10.xls)
(Reap. Dec. 10041)

#### J. Gerber & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 6230, etc.

(Decided June 28, 1961)

*Sharp é Bogan (Charles A. Dukes, Jr.,*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*WUUam S. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General *(Morris Braverman,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

At Baltimore, on April 26,1961, these cases were consolidated for trial and submitted for decision on the following stipulation of facts:

> Mr. Braverman : Government will agree to a stipulation that this merchandise was not freely offered for sale in the principal market of the country of exportation at or about the time of exportation of this merchandise to the United States for home consumption, nor was it so freely offered for exportation to the United States.

> Mr. Dukes : Accepted.

> Mr. Braverman : The Government also is willing to stipulate that this merchandise was not freely offered for sale for domestic consumption in the principal market of the United States to all purchasers at the time of exportation of the imported merchandise in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade.

> Mr. Dukes : Accepted.

> Judge Donlon : The stipulation is accepted and made of record, as is also the written stipulation; and you submit, do you ?

> Mr. Dukes : Xes, ma’am.

> Judge Donlon : You submit, Mr. Braverman?

> Mr. Braverman : Government submits.

> Judge Donlon : All right. Case submitted.

The written stipulation referred to above is an agreed statement that the merchandise of these appeals consists of merchandise described on the invoices as A/A grade marine plywood, exported from Holland in 1954 and 1955; that such merchandise is the same in all material respects as the merchandise in *J. Gerber &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States,*46 Cust. Ct. 562, Reap. Dec. 9898, the record of which has been incorporated here; and that these appeals to reappraisements are *409limited to the merchandise described on the invoices as grade A/A marine plywood.

Accepting the two stipulations as an agreed statement of facts and on authority of the decision in *J. Gerber &*Co., *Inc., supra,*I find and hold that cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for determination of the value of this merchandise, grade A/A marine plywood from Holland, and that such value is the invoice unit price, not packed, less nondutiable charges for inland freight, ocean freight, and insurance.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.