alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~. Revision Authorization Application

TO

u.s. Environmental Protection Agency

Ai' .

?'.

,. ),

State of Oregon's WASTE MANAGEMENT BRANCH

Hazardous Waste Management Program

•

Department of Environmental Quality

June 1994
e··

Table of Contents

_. aSR . egg 'WS*¥H*' PiAP

..i.,

. 'r.' r.·· ( -,~

Oregon

Department of Environmental Quality

June 1994
• I TABLE' OF CONTENTS'

r

I. Introduction

II. Pro~ram Description

III. AttornevGeneral Statement J

IV. Memorandum of Agreement

V. Regulatory Checklist

\

.-

VI.. Appendices

,

\

\

t

I,

I
I. Introduction

Oregon

Department of Environmental Quality

June 1994
•

'•

•

INTRODUCTION

The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality has been administering much of the federal

Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program. Since the initial authorization in 1986,

the Department has requested and became authorized for significant, additional parts of RCRA.

With this application, the Department is requesting authorization for the remainder of the RCRA

program through June 30, 1993. That includes regulations promulgated by the Hazardous and Solid

Waste Amendments of 1984, contained in HSWA Clusters I, II and III, except Corrective Action.

This package also includes an updated Program Description and Memorandum of Agreement.

Oregon has considerable experience administering RCRA, and looks forward to gaining HSWA

authorization. RCRA will share the spotlight with the Department's Toxics Use Reduction and

Hazardous Waste Reduction technical assistance program which will, in conjunction with RCRA,

receive high priority for the foreseeable future. This program is designed and being implemented

to eliminate, or reduce, the production of hazardous waste. This strategy is environmentally sound,

and will help Oregon (and the Environmental Protection Agency) to more efficiently use scarce

resources and personnel to restore, enhance, and maintain the quality of life in Oregon.
From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject: Lowry, Nick (OST) Thursday, February 14, 2013 1:44 PM John Mietus Jr. Qohn@mietuslaw.com) B. Edelman (bedelman@hbs.edu); Dockets Mail; Podberesky, Samuel (OST); Graber, Kimberly (OST) Edelman v Cathay Pacific; Motion for extension, Dkt DOT-OST-2013-0027
This notice is In reference your motion of February 14, 2013. By a motion dated February 14, 2013, Counsel for Cathay Pacific Airways, 

### Ltd., requested an extension oftime in which to prepare an answer in the above-referenced third-party complaint to March 8, 2013. The Respondent's motion advises thatthe Complainantwas contacted and has no objection to grantofthe request. This office has decided to grantfor good cause the requested extension. This notice is issued under authority assigned in 14CFR 302.405{a). Noteto Dockets: Please placethis e-mail in Dkt DOT-OST-2013-0027.



### Nicholas Lowry SeniorAttorney Oflice ofAviation Enforcement& 

### Proceedings Oflice ofthe General Counsel U.S. Dept. ofTransportation 202-366-9351 (ph)

1
**Part 2, Section I: Chart of Accounts**

The Chart of Accounts provides the basic structure for the U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL). It incorporates both proprietary and budgetary accounts. The proprietary and budgetary sets of general ledger accounts are self balancing (the total debits equal total credits). It is important to note that central agency reporting requires a lower level of detail than the 6-digit USSGL account numbers provided. Therefore, the USSGL Board developed attributes containing various domain values that, when added to a basic 6-digit USSGL account, provide the appropriate level of detail needed for central agency reporting and, in effect, create new USSGL accounts. See Section IV for attribute definitions and domain values. It is this lower level of detail, the basic 6-digit USSGL account plus applicable attribute domain values, that agencies must capture at the transaction level to (1) comply with USSGL policy contained herein, and (2) achieve the desired result for proper reporting.

The basic 6-digit USSGL accounts are classified as follows:

**100000 Assets**

**200000 Liabilities**

**300000 Net Position**

**400000 Budgetary**

**500000 Revenue and Other Financing Sources 600000 Expenses**

**700000 Gains/Losses/Miscellaneous Items**

**800000 Memorandum**

Agencies may expand this numbering system to as many digits as necessary to accommodate agency- specific requirements. However, subsidiary accounts must summarize or “roll up” to the 6-digit USSGL accounts plus any related attributes as defined herein.

In February 1999, the USSGL Board voted to delete summary accounts. However, agencies may summarize accounts as they find useful. Section headings replace many of the deleted summary accounts to maintain the integrity of the account structure.

Page 1 of 1

 (Part 2SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection I) (U.S. Standard General LedgerChart of Accounts) (Account Number) (Normal Balance) (Title)

 (Bulletin No. 2017-16) (I CA - 10) (December 2017)

# image1.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                          5
<LEGEND>
   This schedule contains summary financial
   information extracted from Saucony, Inc's.
   Industries, Inc. Form 10-K for the period
   ended December 31, 1999 and is qualified in
   its entirety by reference to such 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                              0000049401
<NAME>                                             Saucony, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                                         1
<CURRENCY>                                         US Dollars

<S>                                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                      12-Mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                     Jan-02-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1.0000
<CASH>                                                            3515
<SECURITIES>                                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                    23968
<ALLOWANCES>                                                      2976
<INVENTORY>                                                      35270
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                 66480
<PP&E>                                                           19267
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   10988
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                   77181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                            15403
<BONDS>                                                            292
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                0
<PREFERRED>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                          2222
<OTHER-SE>                                                       56740
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                     77181
<SALES>                                                         154058
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                154691
<CGS>                                                            95234
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                    95234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                 41261
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  2317
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                 683
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                  17589
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      7194
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                              10319
<DISCONTINUED>                                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                      0
<CHANGES>                                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                                     10319
<EPS-BASIC>                                                       1.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     1.57


</TABLE>
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 34-2 Filed 09/03/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 34-2 Filed 09/03/2003 Page 2 of 2
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS
Minerals Information
Home /  Commodity /  Country /  State /  Products /  Contacts /  MI Home > Products > Minerals YearbookMinerals Yearbook
The Minerals Yearbook is an annual publication that reviews the mineral and material industries of the United States and foreign countries. The Yearbook contains statistical data on materials and minerals and includes information on economic and technical trends and development. The Minerals Yearbook includes chapters on approximately 90 commodities and over 175 countries. 
Volume I. -- Metals and MineralsThis volume, covering metals and minerals, contains chapters on   approximately 90 commodities. In addition, this volume has chapters on mining   and quarrying trends and on statistical surveying methods used by Minerals   Information, plus a statistical summary. 
Volume II. -- Area Reports: DomesticThis volume reviews the U.S. mineral industry by State and Island   possessions. It presents salient statistics on production, consumption, and   other pertinent data for each State and is prepared in cooperation with State   Geological Surveys or related agencies. 
Volume III. -- Area Reports: InternationalThis volume of the Minerals Yearbook provides an annual review of mineral   production and trade and of mineral-related government and industry   developments in more than 175 foreign countries. Each report includes sections   on government policies and programs, environmental issues, trade and   production data, industry structure and ownership, commodity sector   developments, infrastructure, and a summary outlook. 
If needed, file viewers can be obtained through these links: Excel Viewer | PDF Reader | Word ViewerMineral     ResourcesEastern /  Central /  Western /        Alaska /  Minerals       InformationCrustal       Geophysics and Geochemistry /  Spatial Data
AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices

U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological SurveyURL: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/myb.html Page Maintained By: mailto:rcallaghan@usgs.gov?subject=Minerals Information webmaster feedbackPage Last Modified: Thursday, 14-May-2009 10:11:25 EDT
No. 50405.

#### Protest 909111-G/11059 of Sazerac Co., Inc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The only evidence produced consisted of the official papers including a report of the Government chemist as to the alcoholic content of the commodity and the testimony of one witness for. the Government. Plaintiff did not specify which of the commodities enumerated under paragraph 802 in said T. D. 48316 he claims this merchandise to be, but in his brief claims it falls under the specific provision for liqueurs, or, in the alternative, for brandy. Government- counsel contended that the protest should be dismissed as defective, apparently because of lack of specificity. The court, being of the opinion that the invoice description of the instant commodity and the mention of the commodity as “maraschino” is sufficient to direct the paind of the collector to the claim that the commodity is a liqueur, held the protest to be sufficient. The experience of the witness produced on behalf of the Government did not qualify him as an expert on imported cordials or liqueurs, and the chemist’s report was of little value. However, in the answer to protest the appraiser stated that the merchandise was “found to be maraschino, an unsweetened compound.” Plaintiff quoted dictionary definitions to support the claim that maraschino is a liqueur. (See *Batjer & Co. et al.*v. *United States,*11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 60, T. D. 38726.) Inasmuch as the appraiser reported the commodity to be maraschino, unsweetened, and the definitions of “maraschino” describe same as a liqueur, it was held that the merchandise was properly dutiable at $2.50 per proof gallon, as claimed.
Part 1 Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section III

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Account Transaction Categories

TRANSACTION

CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION

Bulletin No. 2021-17 III AC - 1 June 2021

A. Funding

100 - 399 Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections

400 - 699 Authority Transfers

700 - 799 Reimbursables and Other Income

B. Disbursements and Payables

100 - 299 Payments/Purchases

300 - 399 Commitments/Undelivered Orders/Expended Authority - Unpaid

400 - 599 Payables/Accrued Liabilities

600 - 699 Advances and Prepayments

C. Collections and Receivables

100 - 399 Receipts

400 - 599 Receivables/Accrued Revenue

600 - 799 Asset Sale and Disposition (Gains and Losses)

D. Adjustments/Write-offs/Reclassification

100 - 299 Upward and Downward Adjustments

300 - 399 Prior-Period Adjustments

400 - 499 Write-offs

500 - 799 Reclassification/Revaluation

E. Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections

100 - 399 Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499 Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above

500 - 799 Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

F. Yearend

100 - 299 Preclosing Entries

300 - 499 Closing Entries

G. Memorandum Entries

100 - 299 All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

H. Other Specialized Transaction Entries

100 - 799 Other
No. 57242.

protest 188943-K (New York).

#### James McCreery & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon the 61 slips and 1 nightgown missing.from case No.. 225. The protest was sustained to this extent.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 5, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50233

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ADAN FLORES-GONZALES,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CR-2095-ALL

--------------------

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Adan FloresGonzales raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
No. 56387.

protest 148771-K (Los Angeles).

#### Geraldine Litwin *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

When this case was called for trial counsel for the Government admitted that the collector was satisfied that the merchandise should have been admitted free of duty. In view of the evidence presented, the protest was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KRISTIN C. PEREZ HAINES : CIVIL ACTION

:

: NO. 02-CV-4432

v. :

:

RODNEY GENE LEE, et al. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of June, 2003, it is ORDERED that a Jury Trial in

this matter is set for Monday, July 21, 2003 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3-B, United States

Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. It is FURTHER ORDERED that

the final pretrial conference previously scheduled for July 14, 2003 shall be held on Wednesday,

July 16, 2003 at 4:00 p.m. 

BY THE COURT:

 

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04432-BWK Document 24 Filed 06/10/2003 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

Gordon &

Rees LLP

E

mbarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, C

A 94111

-1-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Civil Docket NO. 2:04-CV-00542

STUART M. GORDON (SBN: 037477) 

BRIAN J. MOONEY (SBN: 143795) 

EDWARD R. FITZGERALD (SBN: 227218) 

GORDON & REES LLP 

Embarcadero Center West 

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 

San Francisco, California 94111 

Telephone: (415) 986-5900 

Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 

MARK J. SPOONER (SBN: 171732) 

STEVEN D. PARK (SBN: 215219) 

ARNOLD & PORTER 

777 South Figueroa Street, 44th Floor 

Los Angeles, California 90017 

Telephone: (213) 243-4000 

Facsimile: (213) 243-4199 

Attorneys for Defendants 

WYETH, WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and 

WYETH-AYERST INTERNATIONAL INC. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 

PAUL KROW, et al. 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

WYETH, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 

WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., 

a Delaware Corporation and WYETHAYERST INTERNATIONAL, INC., a 

New York Corporation, 

Defendants. 

_______________________________________

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIVIL DOCKET NO. 2:04-CV-00542 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND 

[PROPOSED] ORDER 

AHP\1016474\908799.1 

Case 2:04-cv-00542-GEB-EFB Document 20 Filed 11/08/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

2

Gordon &

Rees LLP

E

mbarcadero Center West

275 Battery Street, Suite 2000

San Francisco, C

A 94111

-2-

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Civil Docket NO. 2:04-CV-00542

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiff Paul Krow and defendants 

Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., and Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc. (herein 

“Defendants”), by and through their designated counsel that the above-captioned action brought 

by plaintiff Paul Krow in this matter be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 

41(a)(1). 

This Stipulation of Dismissal shall apply to the action brought against Defendants by 

plaintiff Paul Krow only, and will have no effect on the actions brought by plaintiffs Susan 

Bullock, Jacqueline Nielsen, and Loretta Lawrence joined therewith. 

Dated: October ___, 2005 PETROFF & ASSOCIATES 

 

 

 Kip Petroff 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 Paul Krow 

Dated: September___, 2005 GORDON & REES LLP 

 

 Edward R. Fitzgerald. 

 Attorney for Defendants 

 Wyeth, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and 

 Wyeth-Ayerst International, Inc. 

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: November 7, 2005 /s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr. 

 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. 

 United States District Judge 

Case 2:04-cv-00542-GEB-EFB Document 20 Filed 11/08/05 Page 2 of 2
----

----

I Information

Commission

----

COMMON CATALOGUE OF VARIETIES OF VEGETABLE SPECIES

sixth supplement to the 24th complete edition

(2006/C 241 A/01)

CONTENTS

Legend

List of vegetable species

----

LEGEND

----

(1)OJ C 275 A, 8.11.2005, p. 1. Catalogue as last amended by the fifth supplement (OJ C 158 A, 7.7.2006, p. 23).

(2)OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 33. Directive as last amended by Directive 2004/117/EC (OJ L 14, 18.1.2005, p. 18).

----

1.ALLIUM ASCALONICUM L.

2.ALLIUM CEPA L.

5.ALLIUM SATIVUM L.

16.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. CAPITATA (L.) ALEF. VAR. ALBA DC.

17.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. CAPITATA (L.) ALEF. VAR. RUBRA DC.

20.BRASSICA RAPA L. VAR. RAPA

21.CAPSICUM ANNUUM L.

23.CICHORIUM INTYBUS L. (PARTIM)

24.CICHORIUM INTYBUS L. (PARTIM)

26.CUCUMIS MELO L.

27.CUCUMIS SATIVUS L.

32.DAUCUS CAROTA L.

34.LACTUCA SATIVA L.

35.LYCOPERSICON LYCOPERSICUM (L.) KARSTEN EX FARW.

38.PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.

39.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

40.RAPHANUS SATIVUS L.

43.SOLANUM MELONGENA L.

----
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Annual Report of Interdyne  Company (the  "Company") on
Form  10-KSB  for the  fiscal  year  ending  June 30,  2007,  as filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned  hereby certify,  pursuant to and for purposes of 18 U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted  pursuant  to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,
that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

September 10, 2007

                                             By: /s/ Sun Tze Whang
                                                     Sun Tze Whang
                                                     Chief Executive Officer

September 10, 2007

                                             By: /s/ Kit H. Tan
                                                     Kit H. Tan
                                                     Chief Financial Officer

                                       17
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

Number Name Description

Fatal/Proposed

Analytical Type

Applicable SMAF Attribute

/ Domain Value Left Side Label 

994

Potential Edit 4 Replacement

This edit compares specific USSGL accounts and is intended as a replacement for Edit 4 which currently uses statement lines from the 2108. USSGL / USSGL All

2108 Columns 2,3,4,5and 8.

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Summary Report

Draft Bulletin No. 2017-04 VII ESR - 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[Proposed] Order Granting Defendant’s Second Request for an EOT to file a MSJ

1

BILL LOCKYER

Attorney General of the State of California

JAMES M. HUMES

Chief Assistant Attorney General

FRANCES T. GRUNDER

Senior Assistant Attorney General

JAMES E. FLYNN

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

MARIA G. CHAN, State Bar No. 192130

Deputy Attorney General

1300 I Street, Suite 125

P.O. Box 944255

Sacramento, CA 94244-2550

Telephone: (916) 323-1940

Fax: (916) 324-5205

Attorneys for Defendant Runnels

SA2004103389

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTIAGO SOTO,

Plaintiff,

v.

D. L. RUNNELS,

Defendant.

NO. CIV S-04-0571 FCD GGH P

ORDER GRANTING

DEFENDANT’S SECOND

REQUEST FOR AN

EXTENSION OF TIME

Defendant Runnels’ second request for an extension of time to file a motion for

summary judgment was considered by the Court, and good cause appearing, Defendant’s request

is granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant shall have until October 1, 2005 to file a

motion for summary judgment.

DATED: 9/29/05

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

United States Magistrate Judge

soto0571.po2

Case 2:04-cv-00571-FCD-GGH Document 33 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 1