alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3897 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3897

  To require the Election Assistance Commission to develop voluntary 
guidelines for the administration of elections that address the use and 
 risks of artificial intelligence technologies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 11, 2024

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Election Assistance Commission to develop voluntary 
guidelines for the administration of elections that address the use and 
 risks of artificial intelligence technologies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preparing Election Administrators 
for AI Act''.

SEC. 2. VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES FOR ADMINISTRATION OF ELECTIONS THAT 
              ADDRESS THE USE AND RISKS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE 
              TECHNOLOGIES.

    (a) Report and Voluntary Guidelines.--Not later than 60 days after 
the date of the enactment of this Act, the Election Assistance 
Commission shall, in consultation with the National Institute of 
Standards and Technology, submit to Congress, issue to State and local 
election offices, and make available to the public a report with 
voluntary guidelines for election offices that address the use and 
risks of artificial intelligence technologies in the administration of 
elections.
    (b) Contents.--The report submitted and made available pursuant to 
subsection (a) shall include voluntary guidelines that address--
            (1) the risks and benefits associated with using artificial 
        intelligence technologies to conduct election administration 
        activities;
            (2) the cybersecurity risks of artificial intelligence 
        technologies to election administration;
            (3) how information generated and distributed by artificial 
        intelligence technologies can affect the sharing of accurate 
        election information and how election offices should respond; 
        and
            (4) how information generated and distributed by artificial 
        intelligence technologies can affect the spreading of election 
        disinformation that undermines public trust and confidence in 
        elections.
                                 <all>
```
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT, : CIVIL ACTION NO.

: 02-cv-4421

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ, :

:

Defendants. :

DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF

THEIR MOTION TO PRECLUDE RECOVERY OF ATTORNEY’S FEES

I. INTRODUCTION:

Plaintiff instituted the instant action in this Court on July 3, 2002. Plaintiff’s

Complaint asserts a claim under the Pennsylvania Equal Rights Amendment to the

Pennsylvania Constitution for sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge. Plaintiff’s

Complaint includes a demand for attorney fees. Under Pennsylvania law, attorney’s fees

are not recoverable absent express statutory authorization. The Pennsylvania legislature

has not provided for a recovery of attorney fees under the Pennsylvania Equal Rights

Amendment to the Pennsylvania Constitution. Accordingly, the Court should grant the

Defendants’ Motion and preclude the Plaintiff from recovering attorney’s fees.

II. ARGUMENT:

In Merlino v. Delaware County, 556 Pa. 422; 728 A.2d 949 (1999), the

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 43-2 Filed 09/07/2005 Page 1 of 3
-2-

Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that there could be no recovery of attorney’s fees from

an adverse party absent an express statutory authorization, a clear agreement by the

parties, or some other established exception. See also Chatham Communications, Inc. v.

General Press Corp., 463 Pa. 292, 300-01, 344 A.2d 837, 842 (1975) (quoting Corace v.

Balint, 418 Pa. 262, 271, 210 A.2d 882, 886-87 (1965)); In re Kling, 433 Pa. 118, 121,

249 A.2d 552, 554 (1969); Shapiro v. Magaziner, 418 Pa. 278, 280, 210 A.2d 890, 892

(1965). The Court further noted that had the legislature intended to permit recovery of

attorney’s fees, it could have so stated. Merlino, 556 Pa. At 426.

Furthermore, 42 Pa.C.S. §2503(10), Right of Participants to Receive Counsel Fees,

provides that “a litigant is entitled to attorney’s fees as part of the taxable costs, only in

circumstances specified by statute heretofore or hereafter enacted.”

In enacting the Pennsylvania Equal Rights Amendment to the Pennsylvania

Constitution, the Pennsylvania legislature clearly did not explicitly authorize an award of

attorney’s fees. As such, the Court should preclude the Plaintiff from recovering

attorney’s fees in this case.

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 43-2 Filed 09/07/2005 Page 2 of 3
-3-

III. CONCLUSION:

For the reasons set forth herein, the Court should grant the Defendants’ Motion

and preclude the Plaintiff from recovering attorney’s fees in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

SIDNEY L. GOLD & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

/s/ Sidney L. Gold, Esquire SG1387 

SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

Identification No.: 21374

1835 Market Street, Suite 515

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 569-1999

Attorneys for Defendants

 

Dated: September 7, 2005

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 43-2 Filed 09/07/2005 Page 3 of 3
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NEIL DARROW,

Petitioner, No. CIV S-04-0762 GEB PAN P

vs.

SCRIBNER, Warden,

Respondent. ORDER

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges a decision finding him

unsuitable for parole. Petitioner was convicted Sacramento County but he is confined in Kings

County. Since petitioner challenges the duration of his confinement, venue lies in the court

sitting where he is confined. See Dunne v. Henman, 875 F.2d 244, 249 (9th Cir. 1989). Kings

County is in the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

California. See Local Rule 3-120(d). 

Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in

the proper division of a court may, on the court’s own motion, be transferred to the proper

division. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court. 

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00762-GEB-PAN Document 26 Filed 05/04/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of California sitting in Fresno; and

3. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and

shall be filed at:

United States District Court

Eastern District of California

2500 Tulare Street

Fresno, CA 93721

DATED: May 4, 2006.

\004

\darr0762.109

Case 2:04-cv-00762-GEB-PAN Document 26 Filed 05/04/06 Page 2 of 2
1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Red Lion Hotels Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and
have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under
our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;c)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and;
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors:
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Dan R. Jackson
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 31 July 2006 — K.D. Chuck v Raad van bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank

(Case C-331/06)

(2006/C 281/27)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: K.D. Chuck

Defendant: Raad van bestuur van de Sociale Verzekeringsbank

Question referred

Where a worker is resident outside the Community on the date on which he reaches pensionable age, should Article 48 of the Regulation (1) be applied in the same way as in a case where the worker concerned is resident in the territory of the Community?

----

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (English special edition: Series I Chapter 1971(II) p. 416).

----
Before the Third Division,

March 7, 1946

No. 50936.

#### Protests 113129-K(A), etc., of Louis Cohen et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our reports dated November 24, 2009 with respect to the consolidated financial statements, financial statement
schedules and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Griffon Corporation and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Griffon Corporation on Form S-3 (File No. 333-158273,
effective May 18, 2009), Form S-4 (File No. 333-158274, effective May 18, 2009) and Forms S-8 (File
No. 33-39090, effective February 22, 1991, File No. 33-62966, effective May 19, 1993, File No. 33-52319, effective
February 18, 1994, File No. 333-21503, effective February 10, 1997, File No. 333-62319, effective August 26, 1998, File
No. 333-84409, effective August 3, 1999, File No. 333-67760, effective August 17, 2001, File No. 333-88422, effective
May 16, 2002, File No. 333-102742, effective January 27, 2003, File No. 333-131737, effective February 10, 2006, File
No. 333-133833, effective May 5, 2006, File No. 333-149811, effective March 19, 2008 and File No. 333-157190, effective
February 9, 2009).

/s/
GRANT THORNTON LLP

New
York, New York
November 24, 2009

---



QuickLinks
No. 57984.

protest 186431-K (Los Angeles).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., of Los Angeles *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of hats or hoods, made of manila hemp, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained; that the case in question arrived at Los Angeles and was entered for consumption under entry DE 7224 on December 4, 1950, together with nine other cases of the same merchandise on the same invoice; that duty was deposited thereon at 15 percent, the rate then in effect on such merchandise under paragraph 1504 (b) (1), as modified, *supra',*that, because of inaccessibility, the involved case was over-carried to San Francisco, where it was transferred to another ship and returned to Los Angeles, where it was unladen; that the collector would not accept payment of duty under entry DE 7224 on the case over-carried, insisting that another entry be made and that duty be paid at 25 percent, the rate then in effect because of Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52587), terminating certain proclamations relating to concessions initially negotiated with China; and that entry DE 9641, the one in issue, was made in January 1951, duty being paid at 25 percent. Accepting the stipulation as a statement of fact, and following *United States*v. *Grossfeld*(1 Ct. Cust. Appls. 189, T. D. 31218) and *Hale Co. et al.*v. *United States*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 508, T. D. 39660), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, the court holding that the merchandise covered by entry DE 9641 is controlled by the rate of duty in effect on the date the original entry was made and duty paid.
Before the Third Division,

December 10, 1953

No. 57677.

#### Samuel Shapiro & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 192581-K (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that four items of the merchandise in question consist of original artistic busts or statues wrought as professional productions from marble by a professional sculptor under *335the same circumstances and of the same kind in all material respects as the statuary the subject of *Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc., a/c Charles Mason Remey*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 191, C. D. 1409), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1807 was sustained.
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by referencein the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 33-57109) of InternationalAluminum Corporation of our report dated September 8, 2006 relating to theconsolidated financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, which appears in the Annual Report toShareholders, which is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report datedSeptember 8, 2006 relating to the financial statement schedule, which appearsin this Form 10-K.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

LosAngeles, California

September 12, 2006

1

----
From: Christine.Donhardt@memphistn.gov

To: Holt, Jim

Cc: Rogers, Bob; Fritchie, Denis; Zeanah, John

Subject: RE: Voluntary measures 2-15 jh

Date: Friday, February 13, 2015 3:11:36 PM

Attachments: Voluntary measures 2-15 jh jzedits.docx

Jim,

See attached for our updates. We kept the track changes on so you can see what we changed.

Thanks!

From: Holt, Jim [mailto:Jim.Holt@shelbycountytn.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:11 AM

To: Donhardt, Christine

Cc: Rogers, Bob; Fritchie, Denis

Subject: Voluntary measures 2-15 jh

Hi Christine,

We are developing our new redesignation and maintenance plan, because we have data that

shows we are now below the current ozone standard. The attached document was prepared for

the off-set plan that was submitted to EPA last spring/summer. It needs to be updated. There are

various projects discussed and would you look at it and if you know the present status provide a

comment or update? For those projects that you don’t know about, we may discuss when you are

here next week. I may need some guidance on who to contact on those projects, because I can’t

remember now how I got the information for most of them.

Hope all is well. Jim
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/18/21
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

15 November 2006

(2006/C 278/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
for the period ended March 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                              By:  /s/ Marlene Debel
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: May 11, 2007
_____________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Joint Committee on Taxation

April 18, 2002

 JCX-30-02

DESCRIPTION OF H.R. 4156,

THE “CLERGY HOUSING CLARIFICATION ACT OF 2002,”

AS PASSED BY THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ON APRIL 16, 2002

Present Law

Section 107 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that a minister of the gospel’s gross 

income does not include: (1) the rental value of a home furnished as part of his or her 

compensation; or (2) the rental allowance paid as part of his or her compensation, to the extent 

used to rent or provide a home. The Internal Revenue Service’s position (Rev. Rul. 71-280, 

1971-2 C.B.92) is that the amount of the section 107 rental allowance exclusion may not exceed 

the fair rental value of the home plus the cost of utilities.

In Warren v. Commissioner, 114 T.C. No. 23 (2000), the Tax Court ruled that the section 

107 rental allowance exclusion is limited to the amount used to provide the home, and not the 

fair rental value of the home. That case currently is on appeal before the United States Court of 

Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Explanation of Provision

H.R. 4156, as passed, clarifies that the amount of the section 107 rental allowance 

exclusion may not exceed the fair rental value of the home (including furnishings and 

appurtenances) plus the cost of utilities.

Effective Date

The provision is generally applicable for taxable years beginning after December 31, 

2001. The provision also applies to taxable years beginning before January 1, 2002, for which 

the taxpayer: (1) filed a tax return before April 17, 2002, indicating that the section 107 rental 

allowance exclusion is limited to the fair rental value of the home (including furnishings and 

appurtenances) plus the cost of utilities; or (2) files a return after April 16, 2002. Other tax 

returns for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2002, are not subject to the fair rental value 

limitation added by the bill.
(Reap. Dec. 10358)

Entry No. 79008.

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided October 31, 1962)

*Lane, Young & Fox*for tbe plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement consists of prism binoculars manufactured in and exported from Japan to the United States.

> That on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, less the item designated on the invoice as “Agent Commission 5%” in the amount as shown on the invoice.

*433On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the binoculars in question is statutory export value and hold that such value for the merchandise is the appraised value, less the item designated on the invoice as “Agent commission 5%,” in the amount as shown on the invoice.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 47820.

#### Protests 995161-G, etc., of Hollander Bead & Novelty Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in all material respects to the merchandise covered by Abstract 47109, and in view of the further stipulation that they are not composed in any part of synthetic resin or ivory, that they do not imitate pearls, and are not imitation pearl beads, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1503 by virtue of T. D. 49458, as claimed.
Case 2:02-cv-04428-SD Document 25 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 1