1 SUPPORTING STATEMENT

GOLD MINE ORE PROCESSING AND PRODUCTION SOURCES

PART A

1.0 Identification of the Information Collection

(a) Title and Number of the Information Collection.

“ Gold Mine Ore Processing and Production Sources .” T his is a new information collection

request (ICR) and the EPA tracking number is 2383.01

. (b) Short Characterization.

This ICR covers information collection requirements in the final National Emissions

Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants ( NESHAP ) for gold mine ore processing and production

sources ( 40 CFR Part 63, S ubpart EEEEEEE )

. P otential respondents are owners or operators of

all gold mine ore processing and production facilities that use ore pretreatment, carbon processes

with mercury retorts, c arbon processes without mercury retorts , and non

- carbon concentrate

processes

. The owner or operator of an existing facility is required to comply with this rule no

later than 3 years after publication of the final rule in the Federal Register. A new aff ected

source is required to comply by the date of publication of the final rule in the Federal Register or

upon startup of the affected source, whichever occurs later.

The owners or operators of g old mine ore processing facilities subject to the NESHAP ar e

required to meet mercury emission limits . Facilities with existing ore pretreatment processes are

required to meet a mercury emission limit of 127 pounds of mercury per million tons (lb/million

tons) of ore processed, and new sources must meet a limit o f 84 lb/million tons of ore processed.

Facilities with existing carbon processes with mercury retorts are required to meet a mercury

emission limit of 2. 2 lb/ton of concentrate , and new sources must meet a limit of 0. 8 lb/ton of

concentrate

. Facilities w ith existing carbon processes without mercury retorts are required to

meet a mercury emission limit of 0.1 7 lb/ton of concentrate , and new sources must meet a limit

of 0.14 lb/ton of concentrate. Facilities with existing non

- carbon concentrate processes a re

required to meet a mercury emission limit of 0.2 lb/ton of concentrate processed, and new

sources must meet a limit of 0. 1 lb/ton of concentrate processed.

Testing requirements include annual mercury emissions tests of process stacks at affected2 sourc es. M onitoring requirements for roasters include either continuous monitoring of mercury

emissions from roaster stacks or sampl ing mercury concentration twice per month

. Facilities that

emit less than 10 lb/million tons of ore are exempt from the require ment to monitor mercury

continuously. If the twice per month sampling option is chosen, facilities are also required to

perform continuous parametric monitoring of the mercuric chloride scrubbers on roasters for the

scrubber liquor flow rate or line pres sure and the inlet gas temperature and the mercuric scrubber

solution chemistry

. The final rule includes t wo monitoring options for processes controlled by

carbon adsorbers: (1) sampling of the exit stream from the carbon bed for mercury, and (2)

samplin g the carbon for adsorbed mercury. The inlet to the carbon adsorber must also be

monitored for temperature. For wet scrubbers not followed by a mercury control system

, the

final rule requires the scrubber water flow rate or line pressure, and the scrubbe r pressure drop be

monitored. All control device parameters must be maintained within the limits established either

during the initial compliance test , from the manufacturer’s specifications, or approved by the

permitting authority

. Facilities in Nevada already perform annual sampling and analysis for

mercury using EPA Method 29 ; consequently, those facil i ties w ill not incur an y additional stack

testing burden under this proposed rule. In addition, these facil i ties already routinely monitor

scrubber pres sure drop and scrubber liquor flow rate, as well as the gas inlet temperature into

carbon adsorbers.

The owner or operator of an existing or new affected source is required to prepare and

submit an i nitial n otification of applicability and a n initial n oti fication of c ompliance s tatus.

Each owner or operator of an affected source is required to keep records to document compliance

w ith the mercury emission limits and also maintain records of all monitoring data and specified

process throughput data. If a deviation from the rule requirements occurs, an affected source is

required to submit a compliance report for that semi

- annual reporting period.

2. Need For and Use of the Collection

(a) Need/Authority for the Collection

. Section 112(c)(6) of the Clean Air Act ( CAA ) requires that EPA list categories and

subcategories of sources assuring that sources accounting for not less than 90 percent of the

aggregate emissions of each of the seven specified hazardous air pollutants ( HAP ) , including3 mercury are subj ect to standards under section 112(d)(2) or (d)(4)

. The seven HAP specifi ed in

section 112 (c) (6) are as follows : alkylated lead compounds, polycyclic organic matter,

hexachlorobenzene, mercury, polychlorinated biphenyls, 2,3,7,9

- tetrachlorodibenzofuran s, and

2,3,7,8

- tetrachloridibenzo

- p

- dioxin. Congress targeted these HAP for regulation because of their

persistence and tendency to bioaccumulate in the environment. These HAP s are also associated

with adverse health effects such as nervous system damage and reproductive effects. We

published an initial list of source categories under CAA section 112(c)(6) on April 10, 1998 (63

FR 17838). W e are adding gold mine ore processing facilities to this list of source categories

under CAA section 112(c)(6) sole ly on the basis of mercury emissions.

The final standards for mercury are based on the maximum achievable control technology

( MACT ) because standards established under CAA section 112(d)(2) must reflect performance

of MACT. The MACT

- based regulation ca n be based on the emissions reductions achievable

through application of measures, processes, methods, systems, or techniques including, but not

limited to: (1) reducing the volume of, or eliminating emissions of, such pollutants through

process changes, substitutions of materials, or other modifications; (2) enclosing systems or

processes to eliminate emissions; (3) collecting, capturing, or treating such pollutants when

released from a process, stack, storage or fugitive emission point; (4) design, equip ment, work

practices, or operational standards as provided in section 112(h) of the CAA; or (5) a

combination of the above.

The MACT floor is the minimum control level allowed for NESHAP developed pursuant

to 112(d)(2) and is defined under CAA section 11 2(d)(3). For new sources, MACT standards

cannot be less stringent than the emission control achieved in practice by the best

- controlled

similar source, as determined by the Administrator. The MACT standards for existing sources

can be less stringent than standards for new sources, but they cannot be less stringent than the

average emission limitation achieved by the best performing 12 percent of existing sources in the

category or subcategory (for which the Administrator has emission information) or the b est

performing 5 sources for categories or subcategories with fewer than 30 sources.

Certain records and reports are nec essary for the Administrator to confir m the compliance

status of a ffected sources
, identify any new or reconstructed s ources subject to the standards, and4 confirm that the standards are being achieved on a continuous basis. These recordkeeping and

reporting requirements are specifically authorized by section 114 of the CAA (42 U.S.C. 7414)

and set out in the part 63 NESHAP General Provis ions

. Under part 63, the owner or operator

must keep each record for 5 years following the date of each occurrence, measurement,

maintenance, corrective action, report, or record.

(b) Use/Users of the Data.

The information will be used by the delega ted authority (State agency or Regional

Administrator if there is no delegated State agency) to ensure that the emission s limit s and other

requirements are being achieved. Based on review of the recorded information at the site and the

reported informatio n, the delegated permitting authority can identify facilities that may not be in

compliance and decide which plants, records, or processes may need inspection

.

3. Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

(a) Nonduplication.

A comp uter search of EPA's ongoing ICR's revealed no duplication of information

gathering efforts.

(b) Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB.

This section is not applicable because this is a rule

- related ICR.

(c) Consultations.

The final ru le w as developed in consultation with State permitting organizations

, individual plants and trade association s . The non

- EPA persons consulted on the information

collection activities are identified in Table 1.

TABLE 1. PERSONS CONSULTED ON THE INFORMATIO N COLLECTION ACTIVITIES

Contact Organization Telephone Number

Colleen Cripps and staff Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (775) 687

- 9302

John Barber Environmental Committee, Nevada Mining Assoc

. (715) 829

- 2121

Melissa Barbanell Counsel for Barr ick Gold Corporation ( 801 ) 990

- 3815

Joe Beetler N ewmont Mining Corporation ( 775 ) 778

- 4484

Greg Schoen Round M ountain Gold Corporation ( 775 ) 377

- 3336

Kevin Lewis Air S ciences Inc. ( 303 ) 988

- 2960 ext 2135 (d) Effects of Less Frequent Collection.

If the relevant information were collected less frequently, the delegated authority (State or

EPA) would not be reasonably assured that a plant is in compliance with the standards.

(e) General Guidelines

. None of the guidelines in 5 CFR 1320.6 are being exceede d.

(f) Confidentiality.

All information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will

be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart

B

-- Confidentiality of Business Informatio n (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976;

amended by 43 FR 39999, September 28, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 28, 1978; 44 FR

17674, March 23, 1979).

(g) Sensitive Questions.

This section is not applicable because this ICR does not involve matter s of a sensitive

nature.

4. The Respondents and the Information Requested

(a) Respondents/NAIC S Codes

. Potential respondents under S ubpart EEEEEEE are owners or operators of gold mine ore

processing and production facilit ies

. The North American Industry Classification System

( NAICS ) code is 212221 (gold ore mining ). W e estimate that 2 1 gold mine ore processing and

production facilities w ill be subject to the rule requirements; few

, if any

, new sources are

projected during the 3

- year period of this ICR

. (b) Information Requested.

(i) Data Items, Including Recordkeeping Requirements. Attachment 1, Source Data and

Information Requirements, summarizes the data items, including recordkeeping and reporting

requirements.

(ii) Respondent Activities. The respondent activities required by the final rule are

identified in Table 2 an d are introduced in section 6(a).6 5. The Information Collected

– Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and

Information Management

(a) Agency Activities.

The Agency activities are provided in Table 3 and are introduced in section 6(c).

(b) Collection Methodology and Management

. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in

compliance and enforcement programs of the delegated authority . T he monitoring reports

submitted to the delegated authority are used for problem identification, as a check on source

operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations. The EPA is the delegated

authority until the State agency is delegated autho rity to implement the final rule. Therefore,

i nformation contained in the reports submitted to the Regional Administrator will be entered into

the Air Facility System (AFS), which is operated and maintained by EPA's Office of

Compliance. The AFS is EPA’s database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of

compliance data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government

- owned facilities. The

EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by local and state

regulatory agen cies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. The EPA and its delegated

a uthorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data.

(c) Small Entity Flexibility.

A small entity for this industry is defined as: (1) a small business whose parent compan y

meets the Small Business Administration size standards for small businesses found at 13 CFR

121.201 (less than 500 employees for gold mine ore processing facilities); (2) a small

governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, sch ool district, or special

district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not

- for

profit enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. This

final rule is estimated to impact a bout 2 1 gold mine ore processing facilities, none of which are

small entities.

Although this final rule will not affect any small entities , EPA nonetheless has tried to

reduce the impact of this final rule on all of the affected sources . The standards include

parametric monitoring requirements for mercury emission control device s that are common7 throughout the industry and in many cases are already required by State operating permits. The

standards also require only the essential monitoring, recordkeep ing, and reporting needed to

verify compliance.

(d) Collection Schedule

. The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is

shown in Table s 2 and 3

.

6. Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

(a) Estimati ng Respondent Burden.

The annual burden estimates for the final NESHAP are shown in Table 2 . T hese numbers

were derived from estimates based on EPA’s experience with other standards. No burden

estimates are provided for new sources because no new facili ties are expected during the 3

- year

period of this ICR. These estimates represent the maximum burden that w ill be imposed by the

rul e based on all affected sources that are gold mine ore processing and production facilities

. (b) Estimating Respondent Cos ts.

The information collection activities for the final NESHAP are presented in Table 2.

(i) Estimating Labor Costs . Labor rates and associated costs are based on Bureau of

Labor Statistics (BLS) data. Technical, management, and clerical average hour ly rates for private

industry workers in the mining industry (NAICS 212200 ) were taken from the United States

Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 200 9 , which is available at :

http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_212200.htm

. Wages for oc cupational groups are used as

the basis for the labor rates with a total compensation of $ 35.24 /hour for technical

(environmental engineer) , $ 57.27 /hour for managerial, and $ 18.31 /hour for clerical. These rates

represent salaries plus fringe benefits and do not include the cost of overhead. An overhead rate

of 60 percent is used to account for these costs. The fully

- burdened hourly wage rates used to

represent respondent la bor costs are: technical at $ 5 6.38 , management at $ 91.63 , and clerical at

$ 29.30

. (ii) Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

. T he capital cost

for mercury continuous emissions monitoring systems ( CEMS ) and for sorbent trap sampling are8 estimated as $1. 0 4 million , the cost for performance tests are estimated at $1 60

, 140 , and the

annual operations and maintenance costs are estimated to be $ 52 ,000 per year.

(iii) Capital/Startup vs. O&M Costs

. N o startup costs are expected to be incurred over

the 3

- year period of this ICR

. (iv) Annualizing Capital Costs . Tab le 2 shows an estimate of the annualized cost of

capital to b e $ 3 08,210 per year with a total annualized cost of $ 360,210 per year

. (c) Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

. Because the information collection requirements were developed as an incidental pa rt of

standards development, no costs can be attributed to the development of the information

collection requirements. Because reporting and recordkeeping requirements on the part of the

respondents are required under the part 63 NESHAP General Provisions , no operational costs are

expected to be incurred by the Federal Government. Publication and distribution of the

information are part of the Compliance Data System, with the result that no Federal costs can be

directly attributed to the ICR. Examination of records to be maintained by the respondents will

occur incidentally as part of the periodic inspection of sources that is part of EPA's overall

compliance and enforcement program, and, therefore, is not attributable to the ICR. The only

costs that the Federal government w ill incur are user costs associated with the analysis of the

reported information, as presented in Table 3

. The Agency labor rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) 20 10

General Schedule which excludes locality rates o f pay. These rates can be obtained from Salary

Table 20 10

- GS available on the OPM website, http://www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/pdf/gs_h.pdf

. The government employee labor rates are $ 15.63 /hour for c lerical (GS

- 6, Step 3), $ 28.88 for

technical (GS

- 12, Step 1), and $ 38.92 /hr for management (GS

- 13, Step 5). These rates were

increased by 60 percent to include fringe benefits and overhead. The fully

- burdened wage rates

used to represent Agency labor cos ts are: clerical at $ 25.01 ; technical at $ 46.21 , and

management at $ 62.27

. (d) Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

.

There are an estimated 2 1 existing gold mine ore processing facilities that are subject to

the rule requiremen ts

. Few, if any
, new sources are expected to be constructed during the next9 3 y ears. Consequently, the average number of respondents during the 3 year period of this ICR

is 7

.

The component s of the total annual responses attributable to this ICR are tw o one

- time

notifications for each facility (applicability and compliance status)

. Gold mine ore processing

and production facilities are re quired to submit a notification of performance tests, prepare a test

plan, prepare a quality assurance (QA) plan for CEMS, if installed, and conduct a nnual

performance test s for mercury emissions. Each facility must perform continuous or frequent

monitoring for mercury concentration exiting emission control devices and perform parametric

monitoring of mercuric chloride scrubbers on roasters

, carbon adsorbers , and wet scrubbers ;

however, these activities will not be required during the 3

- year period of this ICR . Semi

- annual

reports of excess emissions are required , although no reports are expected to be submitted during

the 3

- year period of this ICR

. Each affected source w ill also be required to prepare a startup,

shutdown, and malfunction plan. T he number of total annual responses for S ubpart EEEEEEE

is estimated as: ( 7 annual average respondents × 1 notification of applicability ) + ( 7 annual

average respondents × 1 notification of compliance status ) + ( 7 annual average respondents × 1

performance test notification) + ( 7 annual average respondents × 1 test plan) + (1.3 annual

average respondents × 1 QA plan) + ( 7 ann ual average respondents × 1 startup, shutdown, and

malfunction plan). T he refore, the number of total annual responses for S ubpart EEEEEEE is

3 6.3 , or an average of 1.7 annual responses per respondent

.
(e) Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables.

(i) Re spondent tally. The bottom line respondent burden hours and costs, presented in

Table 2 are calculated by adding person

- hours per year down each column for technical,

managerial, and clerical staff, and by adding down the cost column.

The average annual b urden for the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements

in S ubpart EEEEEEE is 483 person hours with an annual average burden co st of $ 26,847 with

$1. 0 4 million in capital costs, $ 52 ,000/year in O&M costs , and $ 360,210 /year in total annualized

c ost

. (ii) The Agency tally. The total annual Federal Go vernment cost is for 56 total annual

hours and $ 3 ,8 68 /year . The bottom line Agency burden hours and costs presented in Table 3 are10 calculated by adding person

- hours per year down each column for t echnical, managerial, and

clerical staff, and by adding down the cost column.

(iii) Variations in the annual bottom line. This section does not apply since no

significant variation is anticipated.

(f) Reasons for Change in Burden.

This section does n ot apply because this is a new ICR.

(g) Burden Statement

The average annual respondent burden for the proposed NESHAP for gold mine ore

processing and production sources is estimated at 23 hours per facility

. Burden means the total

time, effort, or fin ancial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose

or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review

instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of

collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and

disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously

applicable instructions and requirements; train personne l to be able to respond to a collection of

information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit

or otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respo nd to a

collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB

control numbers for EPA's regulations in 40 CFR part 63 are listed in 40 CFR part 9.

PART B

This section is not applicable because statistical methods are not used in data collection

associated with the proposed rule

.11 TABLE 2 . ANNUAL RESPONDENT BURDEN AND COSTS

Burden item (A)

Person

hours per

occurrence (B)

No. of

occurrences

per respondent (C)

Person

- hours

per respondent (C=A*B) (D) Respondents

per year (E)

Technical

person

- hours

per year (E=C*D) (F) Management

person

- hours

per year (E*0.05) (G)

Clerical

person

- hours

per year (E*0.1) (H)

Cost a , $

1. Applications N/A 2. Surveys and Studies N/A 3. Acquisition, I nstallation, and Utilization of Technology and Systems N/A

4. Reporting Requirements

A. Read instructions 8 1 8 7 b 56 2.8 5.6 $3,578
B. Required activities N/A c

C. Create information See 4B D. Gather existing information See 4B E. Write report See 4B Initial notification of applicability 2 1 2 7 b 14 0.7 1.4 $8 95 Notification of compliance status 2 1 2 7 b 14 0.7 1.4 $8 95 Request for compliance extension N/A

Site

- specif i c test plan 4 1 4 7 b 28 1.4 2.8 $1, 789
Q ual ity assurance plan for CEMS 8 1 8 1.3 d 11 0.5 1.1 $6 82 Notification of performance test 2 1 2 7 b 14 0.7 1.4 $8 95 Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan 4 1 4 7 b 28 1.4 2.8 $1, 789

5. Re cordkeeping Requirements

A. Read instructions See 4A

B. Plan activities See 4A C. Implement activities See 4A D Develop record system 4 1 4 7 b 28 1.4 2.8 $1, 789

E. Time to enter information 0.5 52 26 7 b 182 9 18 $1 1,629

F. Time to transmit or disclose

information 0.25 2 1 7 b 4 0.2 0.4 $2 24

G. Time to adjust existing ways 2 1 2 7 b 14 0.7 1.4 $8 95 F. Time to train personne l 4 1 4 7 b 28 1.4 2.8 $1, 789

G. Time for audits N/A

TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COST 48 3 hours $ 26,847 Annualized cost of capital e $ 3 08,210 Operation and maintenance (O&M) f $ 52 ,000 Total (capital recovery plus O&M) $ 360,210

a This ICR uses the following labor rates based on Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) data for private industry workers in the mining industry (NAICS 212200) : $ 35.24 /hour for12 technical (environmental engineer), $ 57.27 /hour for managerial, and $ 18.31 /hour for clerical. For a n overhead rate of 60 percent

, t he fully

- bu rdened hourly wage rates are: technical at $5 6.38 , management at $ 91.63 , and clerical at $ 29.30

. b Assumes 21 facilities will be subject to the rule and will perform these activities over the 3

- year term of the ICR ( 21 /3 = 7 respondents per year).

c Rule will require operating CEMS, weekly sampling, and monthly sampling, but these activities will not begin until after the 3

- year ICR period.

d Assumes 4 roaster stacks will be equipped with mercury CEMS (4/3 = 1.33 respondents per year).

e A capital recovery factor of 0.1424 (10 year life at 7%) applied to a total installed capital cost of $1.34 million for monitoring equipment ; also includes $ 160,140 for Method 29 stack sampling for mercury on 17 process units outsid e of Nevada

. f Labor for O&M costs are in cluded in the burden estimates above. These O&M costs are for materials and supplies (e.g., sorbent trap tubes, calibration standards) estimated as

5 % of the installed capital costs ($1. 0 4 million).13 TABLE 3. ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST TO THE AGENCY

Burden Item (A)

Person hours

per occurrence (B)

Occurrences per respondent (C) Plants per

year (D)

Technical hours/year (D=A*B*C) (E) Management

hours/year (E=0.05*D) (F)

Clerical

hours/year (F=0.1*D) (G)

Cost a , $

Observe performance test b 16 1 1 16.0 0.8 1.6 $829
Report Review:

Initial notification of applicability 1 1 7 c 7.0 0.4 0.7 $363
Notification of compliance status 2 1 7 c 14 .0 0. 7 1.4 $ 726
Notification of performance test 2 1 7 c 14 .0 0. 7 1.4 $ 726
Deviation reports N/A

Startup, shutdown, malfunction plan 2 1 7 c 14 .0 0. 7 1.4 $ 726
Semiannual excess emissions report 1 0 0 d

TOTAL BURDEN AND COST (SALARY) $3,368
Travel expenses for tests observed e $500

TOTAL BURDEN AND COST 56.4 hours $3,868

a These rates w ere be obtained from Salary Table 2010

- GS available on the OPM website, http://www.opm.gov/oca/10tables/pdf/gs_h.pdf : $15.63/hour for clerical (GS

- 6, Step 3), $28.88 for technical (GS

- 12, Step 1 ), and $38.92/hr for management (GS

- 13, Step 5). These rates were increased by 60 percent to include fringe benefits and overhead. The fully

burdened wage rates used to represent Agency labor costs are: clerical at $25.01; technical at $46.21, and manag ement at $62.27.

b Assumes Agency staff will observe the performance test of one affected plant per year.

c Assumes 21 gold mine ore processing facilities will be subject to the rule and will perform these activities over the 3

- year term of the ICR ( 21 /3 = 7 respondents per year).

d No excess emissions reports expected during 3

- year ICR period.

e Assumes Agency staff (1 person) will spend 2 days per plant at $50 per diem and $400 transportation expense to observe perfor mance test.14 ATTACHMENT 1. INFORMATION REQUIREMENTS
Requirement for new and existing sources Rule citation Citation for NESHAP general provisions Annual p erformance test for mercury emission s § 63.11 646(a) and (b) 40 CFR 63.7
Monitoring for roasters §63.11 647(a), (b), (c ) NA Monitoring for carbon adsorbers § 63.1 1 647 (f) , (g) NA
Monitoring for wet scrubbers § 63.1 1 647( h ) NA
Notification of applicability § 63.11 648(a) 40 CFR 63.9(b)(2)

Notification of construction/reconstruction 1 NA 40 CFR 63.9(b)(5) Notification of spe cial compliance requirements 1 NA 40 CFR 63.9(d) Notification of performance test Table 1 40 CFR 63.9(c) Notification of opacity observations NA 40 CFR 63.9(f)

Additional CMS notifications NA 40 CFR 63.9(g) Notification of compliance status § 63.11648 (b) 40 CFR 63.9(h)(1)
Notification of changes in information 1 NA 40 CFR 63.9(j)

M alfunction reports § 63.11648(d) NA
Performance test plan Table 1 40 CFR 63.7(c)(2) CMS quality control plan NA 40 CFR 63.8(d) CMS performance evaluation test plan /repor t NA 40 CFR 63.8(e)

Records to support notifications § 63.11648( e ) (1) 40 CFR 63.10(b)(2)
Records of monitoring data § 63.11648( e ) (2) NA
Records of monthly ore and concentrate throughput, operating hours for each process unit § 63.11648( e ) (3) NA
Compliance report if deviation occurs § 63.11648( c ) 40 CFR 63.10(e)(3)

1 R equirement is not expected to occur during the 3

- year term of this ICR