alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL EXTRACTED FROM THE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF ENVIRO-CLEAN OF AMERICA, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES ENDING MARCH 31,
2000, CONTAINED HEREIN, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       8,179,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,910,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                   156,349
<INVENTORY>                                  1,658,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,676,020
<PP&E>                                       1,628,941
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,244,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,189,277
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,296,934
<BONDS>                                      5,056,792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  5,234,000
<COMMON>                                         4,946
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,737,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,189,277
<SALES>                                      3,615,207
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,615,207
<CGS>                                        2,002,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,741,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             212,925
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,442,528
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,612,171
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,830,357
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,830,357
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Page 1 of 1 

M U - 2

S E R V I C E N E W S

MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. 

NAGOYA AEROSPACE SYSTEMS WORKS 

10, OYE-CHO, MINATO-KU, NAGOYA, JAPAN 

JCAB T.C. : No.176 DATE: July 18, 2013 

FAA T.C. : No. 128/32-013 

SUBJECT: Main Landing Gear Oleo Attach Fitting – Inspection of 

MODELS AFFECTED: All A2PC Certified Long Body Airplanes 

 All A10SW Certified Long Body Airplanes 

Three failures of the long body main landing gear oleo strut attach fitting have been reported in the field as 

the result of improper lubrication and/or hard landings. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. (MHI) and 

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries America, Inc. (MHIA) have issued instructions for a periodic non-destructive 

ultrasonic inspection procedure for the main landing gear oleo strut attach fittings, P/N 030A-32314-1/-2.

This ultrasonic inspection procedure will require the owner/operators to have the strut attach fittings 

inspected every 600 hours. Utilizing the ultrasonic inspection procedure, this can be accomplished without 

disassembly of the main landing gear strut assembly. Main landing gear forward doors may be opened for 

easier access and inspection. 

This ultrasonic inspection procedure, repetitive at 600 hrs intervals, is added to applicable Maintenance 

Manuals (MM) and Maintenance Requirement Manual (MRM). The ultrasonic inspection requirement is 

also added to Hard or Overweight Landing inspection requirements in MRM. 

It is strongly recommended that this ultrasonic inspection be conducted during the next periodic inspection 

regardless of the inspection intervals. 

MHIA has prepared an inspection tool kit, P/N 035A-900020-101, to facilitate this inspection. Authorized 

MU-2 Service Centers will have the inspection tool kit on site to provide the ultrasonic inspection during the 

next periodic maintenance. MHIA will maintain one inspection kit in house to be loaned to the field as 

required for the inspection. 

For preventative maintenance, MHI recommends regularly applying grease to the Pin Assembly attached 

to the main landing gear oleo attach fitting through grease ports located on each end of the pin. 

For questions or additional information, contact MHIA Engineering at (972) 934-5480 Ext 207.
(Reap. Dec. 10707)

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. Evju Products Company et al. v. United States

Entry No. 799, etc.

(Decided April 7, 1964)

*1.Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*■John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

'Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are 'before me for decision on a written stipulation of submission, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties .hereto, subject to the approval of the court, as follows:

> ' 1. That the merchandise the subject of the appeals enumerated on Schedule “A” annexed consists of birch plywood exported from Finland.

> 2. That this stipulation is limited to the birch plywood described on Schedule “R” annexed; that as so limited the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United, States*v. *Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation,*46 Oust. Ct. 797, A.R.D. 133, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 3. That the involved merchandise is identified on the Final List published ¡by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act. *488of 1956 (T.D. 54521) ; that said, merchandise was imported both before and after the effective date of said act.

> 4. That the export value of said merchandise, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, or 402a(d), Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by said Customs-Simplification Act, is equal to the price indicated in the column headed “Price-per M sq. ft.” in Schedule “B”, less the proportionate part of the items of ocean freight, marine insurance (if any) and consular fee (if any) as invoiced; that-no foreign value, as defined in section 402(c), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, or 402a(c), Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, existed for the involved merchandise.

> 5. That the appeals may be submitted upon this stipulation, the same being limited to the merchandise described in said Schedule “B” and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts and following the cited decision on the law,. I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the birch plywood in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is equal to the price set forth in the column headed “Price Per M Sq. Ft.” in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, “less the proportionate part of the items of ocean freight, marine insurance (if any) and consular fee (if any) as invoiced.”

As to all merchandise, other than that hereinabove identified and included on the invoices covered by the entries involved herein, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
(Reap. Dec. 8637)

Entry No. 964730, etc.

#### Royal Hair Pin Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided September 7, 1956)

*Sylvan Schwartz*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant' Attorney General, *(Daniel I. Auster,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached to and made part of the decision herein, were filed against the decision of the appraiser in appraising the sewing-machine needles covered thereby for dutiable purposes.

When these cases came on for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of plaintiff, and the court ordered the cases submitted.

In conformity with the requirements of the statute (28 U. S. C. § 2631), I have examined the records in the appeals for a reappraisement before the court and find nothing therein which tends in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness which attaches to the decision of the appraiser. I find, and hold that the proper values of the merchandise are the values returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Order entered October 5 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05
- 14
- 00855
- CV DEUTSCHE BANK, NATIO NAL TRUST COMPANY , AS TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I INC. TRUST 2006
- NC5, MOR TGAGE PASS
- THOUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006 NC5 , Appellant
V. KINGMAN HOLDINGS, LL C , AS TRUSTEE FOR THE MAHOGANY 1857 LAND TRUST , Appellee On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429
- 04363
- 2013 

### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s September 14, 2015 motion to strike a brief tendered to the Court by Kevin Alaimo , who is not a party to this appeal

. The brief was received by the Court on September 10, 2015, but never filed with the Court.
T he motion is DENIED AS MOOT

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

United States District Court

Eastern District of California 

Darrel L. Smith,

Plaintiff, No. Civ. S 04-0702 MCE PAN P

vs. Order

King, et al.,

Defendants.

-oOoOctober 25, 2004, and January 18, 2005, plaintiff filed 

motions to compel discovery without the proof of service required

by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5 and Local Rule 5-135. Defendant answered

the complaint November 29, 2004. Accordingly, plaintiff shall

serve his motions on defendant and serve and file proof of

service within ten days. Otherwise the motion will be denied

without prejudice. 

So ordered.

Dated: June 2, 2005. 

 /s/ Peter A. Nowinski 

 PETER A. NOWINSKI

 Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00702-MCE -EFB Document 44 Filed 06/03/05 Page 1 of 1
From: Garvin, Caryn To: Finamore, Robert (OST) Cc: Heffernan, David Subject: TNT Application Date: Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:40:56 AM

Hi Bob,

We have confirmed that the block space arrangement between TNT and C.A.L. is for the purpose of transporting cargo between Israel and the U.S., via Liege. C.A.L. will not engage in seventh freedom services between LGG and JFK under this agreement. Let us know if you have any further questions.

Best regards,

Caryn

Caryn Garvin | WilmerHale Senior Paralegal 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20006 USA +1 202 247 4196 (t) +1 202 663 6363 (f) caryn.garvin@wilmerhale.com

Please consider the environment before printing this email.

This email message and any attachments are being sent by Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, are confidential, and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately—by replying to this message or by sending an email to postmaster@wilmerhale.com —and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. Thank you.

For more information about WilmerHale, please visit us at http://www.wilmerhale.com

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust--Series B
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>
<CIK>               1051823
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust--Series B
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos

<CASH>                          20,952,005

<SECURITIES>                    (368,252)

<RECEIVABLES>                   3,422

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  20,587,175

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           388,050

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      20,199,125

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    20,587,175

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                (691,213)

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,140,346

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (1,831,559)

<EPS-BASIC>                   (9.09)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces its intent to hold proposal review meetings throughout the year. The purpose of these meetings is to provide advice and recommendations concerning proposals submitted to the NSF for financial support. The agenda for each of these meetings is to review and evaluate proposals as part of the selection process for awards. The review and evaluation may also include assessment of the progress of awarded proposals. The majority of these meetings will take place at NSF, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia 22230. 

These meetings will be closed to the public. The proposals being reviewed include information of a proprietary or confidential nature, including technical information; financial data, such as salaries; and personal information concerning individuals associated with the proposals. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act. NSF will continue to review the agenda and merits of each meeting for overall compliance of the Federal Advisory Committee Act. 

                    These closed proposal review meetings will not be announced on an individual basis in the                     **Federal Register**                    . NSF intends to publish a notice similar to this on a quarterly basis. For an advance listing of the closed proposal review meetings that include the names of the proposal review panel and the time, date, place, and any information on changes, corrections, or cancellations, please visit the NSF Web site:                     *http://www.nsf.gov*. This information may also be requested by telephoning, 703/292-8182.                 

Dated: February 15, 2007. 

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-2968 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Richard B. GOSSARD, Joyce Gossard, Barney Dewees, John Daly, Nursefinders of Sarasota, Inc., Nursefinders of St. Petersberg, Inc., Nursef inders of Mobile, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. ADIA SERVICES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. No. 95-3305. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. April 23, 1999. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. (No. 91-11-CV-T-17B), Thomas G. Wilson, Judge. Before TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judg es, and GODBOLD, Senior Circuit Judge. BARKETT, Circuit Judge: In this tortious interference action, appellants Richard Gossard, Joyce Gossard, Barney Dewees, John Daly, Nursefinders of Sarasota, Inc., Nursefinders of St. Petersburg, Inc., and Nursefinders of Mobile, Inc. (collectively "Gossard") appeal the district court's entry of judgment as a matter of law in favor of Adia Services, Inc. ("Adia"), notwithstanding the jury verdict which resolved all the factual issues in favor of Gossard. The district court's order was based on two findings: (1) that Adia did not "induce or otherwise cause" a breach of contract under Florida law, see Ethan Allen, Inc. v. Georgetown Manor, Inc., 647 So.2d 812, 814 (Fla.1994) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 766 (1977) (defining the tort of "intentional interference with a contract")), and (2) that the jury's $2,488,000 compensatory damage award was based on an erroneous legal theory. The facts of this case are set out in Gossard v. Adia, 120 F.3d 1229 (11th Cir.1997). In that opinion, we concluded that the dispositive question of Florid a law was not dictated by the clear and controlling precedent of the Florida Supreme Court. Accordingl y, we certified the following question to the Florida Supreme Court: WHETHER FLORIDA LAW RECOGNIZES A CLAIM FOR TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE AGAINST A CORPORATION WHICH PURCHASES AS A SUBSIDIARY A CORPORATION

### 2 WHICH HAS A PREEXISTING OBLIGATION NOT TO COMPETE AGAINST ITS FRANCHISEE, PLAINTIFF HEREIN, AND SUBSEQUENTLY PURCHASES ANOTHER SUBSIDIARY WHICH IS IN DIRECT COMPETITION WITH THE FRANCHISEE. Gossard v. Adia, 120 F.3d 1229, 1231 (11th Cir.1997). The Florida Supreme Court answered the certified question in the affirmative. See Gossard v. Adia, (Fla.). Based on this opinion, we REVERSE the distri ct court's grant of judgment as a matter of law and remand this case to the district court for proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Florida Supreme Court.
# Main

Part 2SUPPLEMENT	DRAFT	Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection V

DRAFT Bulletin No. 2017-04	V SF 133/Sch P - &P	IRC Handout 03-02-17

# Footnotes and Additional Inform

Part 2SUPPLEMENT	DRAFT	Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection V

DRAFT Bulletin No. 2017-04	V SF 133/Sch P - &P	IRC Handout 03-02-17

# Attribute table change

DRAFT	

DRAFT Bulletin No. 2017-04		IRC Handout 03-02-17

# Sheet1
Case 2:05-cv-05003-TON Document 78 Filed 09/11/08 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-05003-TON Document 78 Filed 09/11/08 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-05003-TON Document 78 Filed 09/11/08 Page 3 of 3
**USSGL Account 219100 “Employee Health Care Liability Incurred but Not Reported”**

**Proposed FY 2020 Changes**

**Current USSGL Account Title and Definition**

**Account Title:**Employee Health Care Liability Incurred but Not Reported 

**Account Number:**219100 

**Normal Balance:**Credit 

**Definition:**The amount of claims or benefits that occurred during a particular time period but that have not yet been reported or submitted to an insurer. This account does not close at year-end.

**Proposed Modification to USSGL Account Title and Definition**

**Account Title:**Employee Health Care LiabilityLiability for Employer Benefits and Claims Incurred but Not Reported 

**Account Number:**219100 

**Normal Balance:**Credit

**Definition:**The amount of claims or benefits on behalf of employees and/or veterans that occurred during a particular time period, including claims incurred but that have not yet been reported or submitted to an insurer. This account does not close at year-end.

**Justification:**The current USSGL 219100 “Employee Health Care Liability Incurred but Not Reported” implies that only health care claims or benefits on behalf of federal employees should be recorded; the modification clarifies that the account is for claims/benefits on behalf of both active employees and veterans.  Further, the Definition is expanded to include reported benefit claims incurred but not yet reported.

Page 1 of 1                                    IRC Handout February 13, 2020
No. 51663.

#### Protest 58462-K of S. S. Schultz & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

A Government chemist testified that he analyzed a sample of the merchandise and found it to consist of synthetic phenolic resin cemented to a piece of galalith, the proportions being approximately 80 percent resin and 20 percent galalith. He also stated that the synthetic resin had no filler and did not'serve as a binding agent. By stipulation entered into between the respective parties the record in Abstract 45795 was received in evidence. On the record presented the merchandise in question was found to be a manufacture of synthetic phenolic resin and accordingly was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed.
----

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — Heintz van Landewijck SARL v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-494/04) (1)

(Tax provisions - Harmonisation of laws - Directive 92/12/EEC - Excise duty - Tax stamps - Sixth VAT Directive - Articles 2 and 27 - Disappearance of excise stamps)

(2006/C 212/09)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Heintz van Landewijck SARL

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Interpretation of Article 27(1) and (5) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1), as amended by Ninth Directive 78/583/EEC (OJ 1978 L 194, p. 16) — Interpretation of Council Directive 92/12/EEC of 25 February 1992 on the general arrangements for products subject to excise duty and on the holding, movement and monitoring of such products (OJ 1992 L 76, p. 1) — Compatibility of national law with Community law — Tax labels for tobacco products — Disappearance before use

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 45, 19.02.2005.

----
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Infodata Systems, Inc. on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman F. Welsch, Chief
Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.


                                By: /s/ Norman F. Welsch
                                -----------------------------------------------
                                Norman F. Welsch,
                                Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT 	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII  &"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 7/7/21