alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WEYANT : 02-3886

GOODMAN : 02-3910

MARRA, et al. : 02-3913

FREDERICKSEN : 02-3948

FRANCIS : 02-3967

SPACCAMONTI : 02-3971

STETZENBACK : 02-3978

CLEMENT, et al. : 02-4031

CLEMENT, et al. : 02-4032

HARCOURT, et al. : 02-4128

WAGE, et al. : 02-4169

NUNNERY, et al. : 02-4173

JOHNSON, et al. : 02-4216

BLAIR, et al. : 02-4223

CASTO, et al. : 02-4228

ZAMBRANO, et al. : 02-4276

FOSS, et al. : 02-4286

BURKE-SHERMAN, et al. : 02-4366

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring the case to the District of Minnesota.

Case 2:02-cv-04286-RB Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Ronald L. Buckwalter, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04286-RB Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

October 23, 1957

No. 61287.

protest 288010-K (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

*469Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic lenses which are entitled to the reduced rate of duty, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# sec5_sbr_2022

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10December 1, 2021 IRC handout
**Section III Updates – Account Transactions**

**A140**To record anticipated collections including refunds from prior-year amounts that were obligated and outlayed in unexpired Treasury Account Symbol (TAS). 

**Comment:**See USSGL TC A118 for anticipated resources apportioned but not available for use until they are realized. Refunds that were obligated and outlayed from the prior year in a Treasury Account Symbol (TAS) that has not expired or canceled should use this transaction. This transaction is also applicable to credit card rebates.  Agencies posting to USSGL account 462000 should also post USSGL TC-A119.

**Reference:**USSGL implementation guidance; Credit Reform Case Study 

**Budgetary Entry**

Debit 406000 Anticipated Collections From Non-federal Sources 

Debit 407000 Anticipated Collections From federal Sources 

Debit 431000 Anticipated Recoveries of Prior-Year Obligations 

   Credit 445000 Unapportioned Authority 

   Credit 462000 Unobligated Funds Exempt From Apportionment

   Credit 463000 Funds Not Available for Commitment/Obligation

**Proprietary Entry**

None

		IRC Handout July 11, 2019
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended July 1, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kathleen Skero, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: August 11, 2005
______________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3920 

To make permanent the authority to reimburse a member of the uniformed 

services for spouse relicensing and business costs following the relocation 

of the member. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2024 

Mr. OSSOFF (for himself and Mr. SCHMITT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To make permanent the authority to reimburse a member 

of the uniformed services for spouse relicensing and business costs following the relocation of the member. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Military Spouse Job 

5 Continuity Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3920 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERMANENT AUTHORITY TO REIMBURSE A MEM2 BER OF THE UNIFORMED SERVICES FOR 

3 SPOUSE RELICENSING AND BUSINESS COSTS 

4 FOLLOWING MEMBER’S RELOCATION. 

5 Section 453(g) of title 37, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking paragraph (3); and 

8 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (4) and (5) as 

9 paragraphs (3) and (4), respectively. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,450
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,435
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,423
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          59,593
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            57,033
<LOANS>                                        237,697
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,290
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 323,726
<DEPOSITS>                                     262,364
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,042
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            59
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,277
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 323,726
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,570
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,793
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   293
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,766
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,754
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,442
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,324
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       79
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,673
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    978
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         978
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       595
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.15
<LOANS-NON>                                        317
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,273
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      145
<RECOVERIES>                                        83
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,290
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,290
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
#### John Paul TURNER, Appellant v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, Tobacco and Firearms, Appellee

No. 00-5279.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Jan. 25, 2001.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge; SENTELLE and HENDERSON, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. The court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for an opinion. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 36; D.C.Cir. Rule 36(b). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed June 19, 2000, and July 24, 2000, be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated therein.

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. *See*Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
2000 Questionnaire

Measuring America 103

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

104 Measuring America

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

Measuring America 105

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

106 Measuring America

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

Measuring America 107

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

108 Measuring America

U.S. Census Bureau
2000 Questionnaire

Measuring America 109

U.S. Census Bureau
United States Court of Federal Claims

No. 13-597 C

October 4, 2013

_____________________________________

TRC GLOBAL SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Plaintiff,

Subject-matter jurisdiction

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant.

__________________________________

OPINION AND ORDER

Block, Judge.

Plaintiff filed this bid protest seeking to enjoin the Federal Bureau of Investigation 

(“FBI”) from procuring relocation services under Blanket Purchase Agreements (“BPAs”) 

awarded to plaintiff’s competitors. The FBI has announced that it plans to conduct a new 

procurement to replace the challenged BPAs. The awardees are challenging this “corrective 

action” in two consolidated protests pending before the court, in which plaintiff is participating 

as a defendant-intervenor. See WHR Group, Inc. v. United States, 13-cv-515; Lexicon Gov’t 

Services, LLC v. United States, 13-cv-545.

Plaintiff’s protest is materially the same as Brookfield Relocation Inc. v. United States, 

13-cv-592. As in Brookfield, plaintiff and defendant agree that the challenged BPAs are invalid 

and that the FBI should not procure relocation services under them. But for the WHR and 

Lexicon protests, defendant would have already taken corrective action to replace the allegedly 

invalid BPAs. Thus, as in Brookfield, plaintiff and defendant have the same interests and there 

exists no justiciable case or controversy between them.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the court’s opinion in Brookfield, issued earlier 

this day, plaintiff’s protest is DISMISSED, without prejudice, for lack of subject-matter 

jurisdiction. The Clerk shall take the necessary steps to dismiss this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Lawrence J. Block

Lawrence J. Block

Judge
APPENDIX-C 

MICHAEL R FOYTHO 

MONTHLY MAINTENANCE LOG 

UAS #________________________ MONTH____________ YEAR__________ 

System Date

Discovered

Issue Description & Maintenance performed Date

Corrected

Maintenance performed by:

Print & Sign

Software Update

Airframe

Engine

Propellers

Camera Gimbal

Landing Gear

Vibration/Dampening

Other:
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                                                                   |                                    |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| February                  27, 2007 |                                                                                              | /s/ Timothy                  Neher |
|                               | Timothy                  Neher, Chief Executive Officer (Principal                  Executive Officer) |

----
Before the First Division,

April 14, 1955

No. 58943.

protests 71645-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### Samuel S. Perry *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the two classes of merchandise are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Calif-Asia Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 133, C. A. D. 475). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the items marked “A” were held dutiable at 40 percent ad valorem under paragraph 412, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at 25 percent under the said paragraph, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753). Protest 86081-K, having been abandoned, was dismissed.
No. 60794.

#### W. A. Taylor *&*Co. *v.*United States,

protest 231715-K (San Francisco).

*515Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass decanters, wholly or in chief value of glass, blown or partly blown, in the mold or otherwise, cut or engraved, valued at $3 or more each, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE>
                                                                      Exhibit 11
                                  INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
                            COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
            (In millions of dollars except for shares and per share amounts)

                                                  Years  ended December 31,
                                          <C>          <C>           <C>         <C>            <C>
                                        2000         1999          1998         1997          1996
Earnings from continuing operations
  applicable to common stock          $546.2       $563.1        $481.6       $367.6        $342.3
Earnings from discontinued operations
    applicable  to  common  stock      123.2         28.0          27.5         12.9          15.7
Net earnings applicable
  to common stock                     $669.4       $591.1        $509.1       $380.5        $358.0

Average number of common
  shares outstanding             161,205,386  163,644,073   163,669,777  163,206,932   161,238,547

Number of common shares
  issuable assuming exercise
  under incentive stock plans      1,205,463    2,108,724     1,812,035    1,617,803     1,031,137
Average number of outstanding
  shares for diluted earnings
  per share calculations         162,410,849  165,752,797   165,481,812  164,824,735   162,269,684

Basic earnings per share:
  Continuing operations                $3.39        $3.44         $2.94        $2.25         $2.12
  Discontinued operations               0.76         0.17          0.17         0.08          0.10
                                       $4.15        $3.61         $3.11        $2.33         $2.22

Diluted earnings per share:
  Continuing operations                $3.36        $3.40         $2.91         $2.23        $2.11
  Discontinued operations               0.76         0.17          0.17          0.08         0.10
                                       $4.12        $3.57         $3.08         $2.31        $2.21
</TABLE>

Note: The results of Dresser-Rand Company have been reclassified from
discontinued operations to continuing operations for all periods presented.
rtsp://multimedia.mcpa.virginia.edu/911/hearing10/2004041403_high.rm
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                                         MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III
                                         MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.
                                         COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                         COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS (UNAUDITED)
                                                 (dollars in thousands)



                              FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED          FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                     March 30, 2007                      March 31, 2006
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P. CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 13,531           $ 15,876        $ 13,531           $ 15,854
                               ========           ========        ========           ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    13,125             13,531          13,125             13,531
                               --------           --------        --------           --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirments                   $ 13,125           $ 13,531        $ 13,125           $ 13,531
                               ========           ========        ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 9


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS

We refer to our report auditing estimates of the
natural gas, natural gas liquids and conventional oil reserves
attributable to Husky Energy Inc. (the Company)
as of December 31, 2003 (the Report).

We hereby consent to references to our name in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 40-F to be filed
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
the Companys registration statement on Form F-9 (File
No. 333-89714). We also confirm that we have read the
Companys Annual Information Form for the year ended
December 31, 2003 dated March 18, 2004 and that we
have no reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations
in the information contained in it that was derived from the
Report or that is within our knowledge as a result of the
services we performed in connection with such Report.



| |                                       
| | --------------------------------------
| | Sincerely,                            
|
| | MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD.
|
| | /s/ B. H. EMSLIE                      
| |                                       
| | B. H. Emslie, P. Eng.                 
| | Senior Vice President                 

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

March 18, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARITRANS OPERATING :

COMPANY, L.P. :

: CIVIL ACTION

:

:

v. :

: NO. 02-CV-4429

:

CHRIS-MARINE USA, INC. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of April, 2003, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. An Initial Pretrial Conference will be held on June 6, 2003 at 10:00 a.m in

Chambers. All trial counsel and unrepresented parties shall attend. Counsel participating in the

conference must be authorized and empowered to discuss and make binding decisions with

regard to all aspects of this case. 

2. No later than five (5) days prior to the date of the Initial Pretrial Scheduling

 Conference, the parties shall file with the Court a written Joint Case Report which shall include

the following information:

A. A brief statement describing the facts of the case and the basis for the

Court’s jurisdiction over the parties and the action (not to exceed three (3) pages); 

B. A brief statement of all causes of action, the essential elements of each

cause of action, and the relief sought; 

C. A brief statement of the defenses asserted and the essential elements of each

Case 2:02-cv-04429-RBS Document 5 Filed 04/17/2003 Page 1 of 2
affirmative defense;

D. Whether the Parties have complied with the disclosure requirements of

Fed.R.Civ.P.26(a)(1) and, if not the date on which such disclosures will be completed;

E. The date by which the Parties anticipate all discovery (including expert

discovery) will be completed;

F. Whether all necessary parties have been properly joined, and if not, the

name of any such party and each Party’s respective position of why such party is or is not

necessary to the action; 

G. Whether settlement negotiations have taken place and each Party’s

respective position on settlement;

H. A list of all counsel who will be attending the Scheduling Conference,

identifying the party whom each attorney represents. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

BY THE COURT:

_____________________

R. Barclay Surrick, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04429-RBS Document 5 Filed 04/17/2003 Page 2 of 2
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 80 Att. 8

Dockets.Justia.com
# sec6_rsonp_2021

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSOCNP	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout February 10, 2021