Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2023 / Notices 80335 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

China; Ningbo Minzhou Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. (‘‘Ningbo Minzhou’’) of 

Beijing, China; Ruian Xiu Yuan Guoji 

MaoYi Youxian Gongsi Co., Ltd. of 

Zhejiang, China; Shandong Jiu Hui 

Xinxi Keji Youxian Gongsi Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘Shangdong Jiu Hui’’) of Shandong, 

China; Shanxi Chao Ma Xun Keji 

Youxian Gongsi Co., Ltd. of Shanxi, 

China; Shenzhen Baibaikang 

Technology Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, 

China; Shenzhen Leadfar Industry Co., 

Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen Leadfar’’) of 

Guangdong, China; Shenzhen Shi Mai 

Rui Ke Dianzi Shangwu Co., Ltd. of 

Guangdong, China; Shenzhen Shi Xin 

Shangpin Dianzi Shangwu Youxian 

Gongsi Co., Ltd. (‘‘Shenzhen Shi Xin’’) 

of Guangdong, China; Shenzhen Shi 

Yan Huang Chu Hai Keji Youxian 

Gongsi Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, China; 

Shenzhen Shi Yuxiang Meirong Yongju 

Youxian Gongsi Co., Ltd. of Guangdong, 

China; Shenzhen Tianrun Material Co., 

Ltd. of Guangdong, China; Wuhan 

Chenkuxuan Technology Co., Ltd. of 

Hubei, China; Xiao Dawei of Fujian, 

China; Xiao Xiao Pi Fa Shang Mao You 

Xian Ze Ren Gongsi Co. of Shanxi, 

China; YaRu Wang of Shanxi, China; 

Yiwu Youru E-commerce Co., Ltd. of 

Zhejiang, China; Zhejiang Xinhui 

Import & Export Co., Ltd. of Zhejiang, 

China; and Zhou Meng Bo of 

Guangdong, China. Id. at 56087–88. The 

Office of Unfair Import Investigations 

(‘‘OUII’’) was also a party to this 

investigation. Id. at 56088. 

Five (5) respondents were terminated 

by withdrawal of allegations in the 

Complaint pursuant to Order No. 15 

(Jan. 10, 2023), unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (Feb. 8, 2023). Twenty-five (25) 

additional respondents were terminated 

by withdrawal of allegations in the 

Complaint pursuant to Order No. 19 

(Feb. 16, 2023), unreviewed by Comm’n 

Notice (Mar. 20, 2023), reconsidered in 

part by Comm’n Notice (May 19, 2023). 

Complainant also withdrew its 

allegations with respect to trade dress 

infringement, the ’556 mark, the ’053 

mark, and the D’092 patent pursuant to 

Order No. 19. Id. Seven additional 

respondents were terminated by consent 

order pursuant to Order No. 23 (Mar. 30, 

2023) (Shenzhen Shi Xin), Order No. 24 

(Apr. 3, 2023) (Bedmate-U), Order No. 

25 (Apr. 7, 2023) (Henson Holdings), 

Order No. 26 (Apr. 10, 2023) (Ningbo 

Minzhou), Order No. 27 (Apr. 12, 2023) 

(Lei Lei Wang), Order No. 28 (Apr. 13, 

2023) (Hetaibao), and Order No. 29 (May 

10, 2023) (Ningbo Bolian), unreviewed 

by Comm’n Notice (May 19, 2023). 

Dirani Design, Dongguan Jingrui, 

Hangzhou Lydia, and Shenzhen Leadfar 

(collectively, the ‘‘Defaulting 

Respondents’’) were found in default 

pursuant to Order No. 16 (Jan. 11, 2023), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Feb. 8, 

2023), and Order No. 21 (Mar. 8, 2023), 

unreviewed by Comm’n Notice (Mar. 30, 

2023). 

On March 15, 2023, Complainant filed 

a motion for summary determination of 

violation with respect to infringement of 

certain claims of the ’837 patent and the 

’445 patent by the Defaulting 

Respondents. On March 29, 2023, OUII 

filed a response in support of the 

motion. 

On July 13, 2023, the ALJ issued an 

Initial Determination granting 

Complainant’s motion with respect to 

the ’445 patent, noted that a finding of 

violation was unnecessary as to Dirani 

Design relating to the ’837 patent 

because Complainant sought only an 

LEO, and issued a Recommended 

Determination on Remedy and Bond 

(Order No. 31, the ‘‘ID’’ and ‘‘RD’’). No 

petitions for review of the ID were filed. 

On August 28, 2023, the Commission 

determined to review the ID in part and 

to affirm, with modifications, the ALJ’s 

grant of summary determination of a 

violation of section 337 by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of the 

’445 patent by Dongguan Jingrui, 

Hangzhou Lydia, and Shenzhen Leadfar. 

88 FR 60491–94. The Commission 

requested submissions on remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding. Id. 

Complainant filed a public interest 

statement on August 14, 2023, and a 

written submission on remedy, the 

public interest, and bonding on 

September 11, 2023. OUII filed a written 

submission on remedy, the public 

interest, and bonding on September 11, 

2023, and a reply submission on 

remedy, the public interest, and 

bonding on September 18, 2023. 

Having examined the record in this 

investigation, the Commission has 

determined pursuant to section 

337(g)(1) and Commission Rule 

210.16(c) to issue an LEO prohibiting 

the unlicensed entry of certain pillows 

and seat cushions, components thereof, 

and packaging thereof that infringe one 

or more of claims 1, 3, 4, and 10 of the 

’837 patent that are manufactured 

abroad by, or on behalf of, or imported 

by or on behalf of Dirani Design. The 

Commission has also determined 

pursuant to section 337(d) to issue a 

GEO prohibiting the unlicensed entry of 

certain pillows and seat cushions, 

components thereof, and packaging 

thereof that infringe one or more of 

claims 18, 19, 21–29, and 33 of the ’445 

patent. The Commission has further 

determined to issue CDOs against Dirani 

Design, Dongguan Jingrui, Hangzhou 

Lydia, and Shenzhen Leadfar. 

The Commission has determined that 

the public interest factors enumerated in 

subsections (d)(1), (f), and (g)(1) of 

section 337 do not preclude the 

issuance of the remedial orders. The 

Commission has further determined that 

the bond during the period of 

Presidential review pursuant to section 

337(j) (19 U.S.C. 1337(j)) shall be set in 

the amount of one hundred percent 

(100%) of the entered value of the 

imported articles that are subject to the 

LEO and GEO. The Commission’s 

remedial orders were delivered to the 

President and to the United States Trade 

Representative on the day of their 

issuance. The investigation is hereby 

terminated. 

While temporary remote operating 

procedures are in place in response to 

COVID–19, the Office of the Secretary is 

not able to serve parties that have not 

retained counsel or otherwise provided 

a point of contact for electronic service. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Commission 

Rules 201.16(a) and 210.7(a)(1) (19 CFR 

201.16(a), 210.7(a)(1)), the Commission 

orders that the Complainant(s) complete 

service for any party/parties without a 

method of electronic service noted on 

the attached Certificate of Service and 

shall file proof of service on the 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS). 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on November 

13, 2023. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 13, 2023. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2023–25412 Filed 11–16–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–472 (Fifth 

Review)] 

Silicon Metal From China; 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
80336 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 221 / Friday, November 17, 2023 / Notices 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on silicon 

metal from China would be likely to 

lead to continuation or recurrence of 

material injury to an industry in the 

United States within a reasonably 

foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on May 1, 2023 (88 FR 26595) 

and determined on August 4, 2023 that 

it would conduct an expedited review 

(88 FR 61613, September 7, 2023). 

The Commission made this 

determination pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determination in 

this review on November 14, 2023. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5473 (November 

2023), entitled Silicon Metal from 

China: Investigation No. 731–TA–472 

(Fifth Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: November 14, 2023. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2023–25469 Filed 11–16–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1375] 

Certain Mobile Phones, Components 

Thereof, and Products Containing 

Same; Notice of Institution of 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

October 11, 2023, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Telefonaktiebolaget LM 

Ericsson of Sweden. Supplements were 

filed on October 31, 2023 and November 

9, 2023. The complaint alleges 

violations of section 337 based upon the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain mobile phones, components 

thereof, and products containing same 

by reason of the infringement of certain 

claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,425,817 

(‘‘the ’817 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

10,306,669 (‘‘the ’669 patent’’); U.S. 

Patent No. 11,317,342 (‘‘the ’342 

patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 11,515,893 

(‘‘the ’893 patent’’). The complaint 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists or is in the process 

of being established as required by the 

applicable Federal Statute. The 

complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

limited exclusion order and cease and 

desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: 

The authority for institution of this 

investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2023). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

November 13, 2023, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

10–16 of the ’817 patent; claims 1–23 of 

the ’669 patent; claims 1–18 and 34–40 

of the ’342 patent; and claims 1–12 of 

the ’893 patent, and whether an 

industry in the United States exists or 

is in the process of being established as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘mobile phones and 

smartphones capable of operating in a 

5G network’’; 

(3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the 

presiding administrative law judge shall 

take evidence or other information and 

hear arguments from the parties or other 

interested persons with respect to the 

public interest in this investigation, as 

appropriate, and provide the 

Commission with findings of fact and a 

recommended determination on this 

issue, which shall be limited to the 

statutory public interest factors set forth 

in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); 

(4) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: 

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, 

Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, Stockholm, 

Sweden 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 W. 

Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800, 

Chicago, Illinois 60654 

Lenovo (United States) Inc., 1009 Think 

Place, Building One, Morrisville, NC 

27560 

Lenovo Group Limited, 23rd Floor, 

Lincoln House, Taikoo Place, 979 

King’s Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong 

SAR 

Motorola (Wuhan) Mobility 

Technologies, Communication Co., 

LTD., 19 Gaoxin 4th Road, Donghu 

New Technology Development Zone, 

Hubei 430205 Wuhan, China 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(5) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES