alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Publication of existing State aid measures in the new Member States in the sector of transport

(2006/C 220/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

In accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 4, Chapter 3 of Annex IV to the Treaty of Accession the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic communicated to the Commission State aid measures which may be regarded as existing aid within the meaning of Article 88(1) of the EC Treaty until the end of the third year after the date of accession. The Republic of Lithuania did not inform the Commission of any such measures.

The list of these State aid measures, as notified to the Commission by these Member States, are/is hereby published in the official language of the submitting country.

This list, translated in a working language of the European Commission (EN, DE or FR) will be placed on the following Internet website of the European Commission:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/energy_transport/state_aid/index_en.htm.

This publication shall in no circumstances be regarded as an official position of the Commission regarding these measures, in particular as to whether these measures fulfil all the conditions as laid down by the Treaty of Accession or whether they are deemed compatible with the Treaty.

The Czech Republic

The Republic of Cyprus

The Reublic of Estonia

The Republic of Hungary

The Republic of Latvia

The Republic of Malta

The Republic of Poland

The Republic of Slovakia

The Republic of Slovenia

----
U:\DOCS\pak\Transoce an-Holt-Marino\c ert o f ser vice.wpd

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, PAUL A. KETTUNEN, Esquire, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of Joseph

and Maureen Levy’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Entry of Default Judgment Against Defendants

Joseph Levy and Maureen Levy, Memorandum of Law in Support Of Motion for Entry of Default

Judgment, and proposed Order was served on September 8, 2003, U.S. mail (with exhibits) and by

facsimile (without exhibits) on the following attorneys:

Ann-Michele G. Higgins, Esquire

Rawle & Henderson

The Widener Bldg.

One South Penn Square

Phila., PA 19107

(Inchcape Shipping)

A. Robert Degen, Esquire

Fox Rothschild O’Brien

& Frankel

2000 Market St. - 10th Fl.

Phila., PA 19103

(Kent Line International)

Thomas More Holland, Esquire

Grace Hall

1522 Locust St.

Phila., PA 19102

(Plaintiff)

___________________________________

PAUL A. KETTUNEN, ESQUIRE 

Case 2:02-cv-04488-BMS Document 50-3 Filed 09/08/2003 Page 1 of 1
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDEDMarch 31, 2010
    
    
    March 31, 2009MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    

FUNDING IV, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    

FUNDING IV, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    8,552
    
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    8,555Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    7,120
    
    
    
    7,340
    
    
    
    7,120
    
    
    
    7,340Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    7,120
    
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    7,120
    
    
    $
    7,340Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANDRE STRUM : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 05-5280

:

JOHN A. PALAKOVICH, et al :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of March, 2015, upon consideration of the Petitioner’s

Motion for Relief from Judgment Pursuant to Rule 60(b) (Document No. 33) and the

response to the motion, it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

 /s/Timothy J. Savage 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:05-cv-05280-TJS Document 39 Filed 03/19/15 Page 1 of 1
# sec5_custodialact_2023

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2023-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCA - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2022
**A Brief History - 35 Years
Contents / Next
**
Before the First Division,

December 18, 1959

No. 63613.

protests 304280-K, 311048-K, and 315989-K (New York).

#### Shell Chemical Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of teepol the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Shell Oil Co., Inc., et al.*(44 C.C.P.A. 54, C.A.D. 637), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                              EXHIBIT 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY CONSTITUTE AND APPOINT IRVING WEISER, JOHN C.
APPEL, AND DAVID J. PARRIN, AND EACH OF THEM, HIS TRUE AND LAWFUL
ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT AND AGENTS, WITH FULL POWERS OF SUBSTITUTION AND
RESUBSTITUTION, FOR HIM AND IN HIS NAME, PLACE AND STEAD, IN ANY AND ALL
CAPACITIES, TO SIGN THE ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF DAIN RAUSCHER CORPORATION
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND ALL AMENDMENTS TO SUCH ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-K, AND TO FILE THE SAME WITH ALL EXHIBITS THERETO, AND OTHER
DOCUMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
GRANTING UNTO SAID ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT AND AGENTS, EACH ACTING ALONE, FULL POWER
AND AUTHORITY TO DO AND PERFORM TO ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES AS HE MIGHT OR COULD
DO IN PERSON, HEREBY RATIFYING ALL THAT SAID ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT AND AGENTS, EACH
ACTING ALONE, OR HIS SUBSTITUTES, MAY LAWFULLY DO OR CAUSE TO BE DONE BY VIRTUE
THEREOF.

         SIGNATURE                                           DATE
         ---------                                           ----



-----------------------------                       ----------------------------
       JOHN C. APPEL


-----------------------------                       ----------------------------
       J. EVANS ATTWELL


------------------------------                      ----------------------------
       SUSAN S. BOREN


------------------------------                      ----------------------------
       F. GREGORY FITZGERALD



------------------------------                      ----------------------------
       WALTER F. MONDALE



-------------------------------                     ----------------------------
       C. A. RUNDELL, JR.



-------------------------------                     ----------------------------
       ROBERT L. RYAN



-------------------------------                     ----------------------------
       ARTHUR R. SCHULZE, JR.



-------------------------------                     ----------------------------
       IRVING WEISER



-------------------------------                     ----------------------------
       KENNETH J. WESSELS
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular" 	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII &"Arial,Regular" 

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/4/18
Before The Third Division,

September 23, 1948

No. 52551.

protest 961682-G (San Francisco) .

#### The Columbia Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial plaintiff'abandoned all claims except as to the merchandise assessed at 18)4 cents per pound, involved in case No. 511 and designated as “Almond Powder.” The appraiser’s answer to protest, received in evidence, stated that this merchandise should have been returned at 20 percent under paragraph 1558, following Abstract 36104. In view of this statement and following the cited authority, the merchandise contained in case No. 511, designated as almond powder, was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558, as a nonenumerated manufactured article. The protest was overruled in all other respects.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 23, 2015

Order 

June 23, 2015

149537(54)

In re WANGLER/PASCHKE, Minors.

SC: 149537

COA: 318186

Sanilac CC Family Division: 

07-035009-NA

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Family Defense Attorneys of 

Michigan for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief will be 

accepted for filing if submitted on or before July 22, 2015.
# C_2022303EN.01003401.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — Dumitrescu and Schwarz v Commission

(Case T-531/16) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations - Reimbursement of annual travel expenses - Place of origin located in a third country - Flat-rate payment calculated on the basis of the distance separating the place of employment from the capital of the Member State of which the official is a national)

(2022/C 303/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Vasile Dumitrescu (Berchem-Sainte-Agathe, Belgium), Guido Schwarz (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and M. Ecker, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Applications under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decisions to reduce, from 1 January 2014, the reimbursement of annual travel expenses enabling the applicants to maintain a connection with their place of origin and for an order requiring the Commission to make a reimbursement of annual travel expenses to the applicants’ place of origin that covers their actual expenses.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Vasile Dumitrescu and Guido Schwarz to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Vasile Dumitrescu and Guido Schwarz to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015 (case initially registered before the European Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-7/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In Re Cylink Securities : MISC. ACTION

Litigation :

 :

:

JONNY ALPERN, :

:

PLAINTIFF :

 :

v. :

:

THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET, INC. :

:

RESPONDENT : NO. 02-176

 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2002, it is Ordered

that a hearing on the Motion to Compel non-party, NASDAQ, to

comply with subpoena duces tecum (doc. no. 1) is scheduled for

July 31, 2002 at 9:00 a.m., before the Honorable Eduardo C.

Robreno, in Courtroom 12A, 12th floor, U.S. Courthouse, 601

Market Street, Philadelphia, PA.

 ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

 BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Judge 

 

C.V. 12 (4/99)

faxed & mailed to: John F. Innelli, Esq.

 William M. Connolly, Esq.

Case 2:02-mc-00176-ER Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-mc-00176-ER Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 021 Attachment Name CAS RN 1456803-12-5 Summary Molecular Weight Distribution and Percent Monomer Composition Associated PMN Section Number Pt.I, Sec.B, 2a. (Chem 5) Contains CBI Report Number Sanitized Version

# All CBI has been removed
Exhibit
32.1
 Park City Group, Inc. &
Subsidiaries
 Certification Pursuant
To
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As
Adopted Pursuant To
 Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
 
 In
connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Randall K. Fields,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company and I, John Merrill, Principal
Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 Dated:        September
29, 2008
 
 _______________________________________________
                /s/
      Randall K. Fields
                Principal
      Executive Officer, CEO
 
 
 Dated:        September
29, 2008
 
 _______________________________________________
                /s/
      John R, Merrill
                Principal
      Financial Officer, CFO
 
 
 
 
 (REMAINDER
OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
Before the First Division,

April 6, 1955

No. 58930.

protests 712844-G, etc. (New York).

#### J. H. Bleistein, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” consist of kidskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480); that the items marked “G” consist of goatskins the same as those involved in *United States*v. *Winograd Bros., Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302); that the items marked “L” consist of lambskin plates the same as those the subject of *A. S. Cold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643); and that the items marked “M” consist of moufflons similar to those involved in Abstract 57768. Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact and following the cited decisions, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinions in C. D. 1480 and C. D. 1643, *supra,*insofar as the items marked *“A”*and *“h”*are concerned.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on June 11, 2003, a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Plaintiff The Chester County Hospital's Response to Cigna Corporation's Objection and 

Motion for a Protective Order was served on the following counsel as follows: 

 Via Hand Delivery:

 

 William J. Leonard, Esquire 

 Obermayer Rebmann Maxwell & Hippel, LLP 

 One Penn Center, 19th Floor 

 1617 John F. Kennedy Boulevard 

 Philadelphia, PA 19103-1895 

 Via Federal Express: 

 John DeQ Briggs, Esquire 

 Howrey Simon Arnold & White LLP 

 1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

 Washington, D.C. 20004 

 ________________________ 

 Seth A. Goldberg 

 

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 65-2 Filed 06/11/2003 Page 1 of 1
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3938 

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, as the ‘‘Private First Class 

Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2024 

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs in Lynchburg, Virginia, 

as the ‘‘Private First Class Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF PRIVATE FIRST CLASS 

4 DESMOND T. DOSS VA CLINIC IN LYNCHBURG, 

5 VIRGINIA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.— The community-based outpatient 

7 clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs in Lynch8 burg, Virginia, shall after the date of the enactment of 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3938 IS

1 this Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Private First 

2 Class Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCE.—Any reference in any law, regula4 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be 

6 considered to be a reference to the Private First Class 

7 Desmond T. Doss VA Clinic. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
1       

Proposed Changes to current USSGL Accounts 2019 for SFFAS 51 Insurance Programs Account Title: Life Insurance Benefits Due and Payable to Beneficiaries Account Number: 221800 Normal Balance: Credit Definition: The amount of life insurance benefits due from the administering plans to eligible beneficiaries. This liability. (Refer to FASAB SFFAS No. 1, "Accounting for Selected Assets and Liabilities," paragraph 84 51, “Inparagraphs 53-64.) This account does not close at yearend. Justification: This account definition needs updated to reflect new guidance from SFFAS No. 51, Insurance Probecame effective for FY19 reporting. Account Title: Actuarial Life Insurance Liability Account Number: 263000 Normal Balance: Credit Definition: The amount recorded by administering Federal agencies for the expected present value of future outfon behalf of, existing policy holders, less expected present value of future net premiums to be collected. (Refer to 5, "Accounting for Liabilities of the Federal Government," paragraph 113. 51, “Insurance Programs,” paragraphs does not close at yearend. Justification: This account definition needs updated to reflect new guidance from SFFAS No. 51, Insurance Probecame effective for FY19 reporting.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Flagship Global Health, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three and nine month periods ended March
      31,
      2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Form 10-QSB"), I, Philip E. Barak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)  The
      Form
      10-QSB complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.


Dated:
                May 15, 2007
              
              /s/
                Philip E. BarakPhilip
                E. Barak - Chief Financial
                Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10687)

#### S. Jackson & Son, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 7105.

(Decided February 19, 1964)

*iSharp é Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, etseq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> *4625. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, within the provisions of section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, to be $19.59 per 1,000 square feet, and the purchase price of said merchandise, as defined in section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), bo be $21.85 per 1,000 square feet.

As to all other items of merchandise not identified in said schedule A, I find the foreign market value and the purchase price to be as reported by the appraiser.

In all other respects, the values of the merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 21, 2014

Order 

October 21, 2014

150126 & (53)

CARL MENNARE, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

and

FAY MARIE MENNARE,

Plaintiff,

v

BRETT DANIEL RAMSDEN,

Defendant,

and

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF LANSING

Defendant-Appellant.

SC: 150126

COA: 315182

Ingham CC: 11-000242-NI

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the stipulation to dismiss the application for leave to 

appeal is GRANTED. The dismissal is with prejudice and without costs or fees to any 

party.
No. 66309.

#### Design International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 61/8389 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall-hung furniture similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fabry Associates, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 88, C.D. 2203), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
-79 -78 -77 -76

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

08/23

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.06 N 76.88 W Meters AGL