alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                          EXHIBIT 12


                                                             MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
                                                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
                                                               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                                                   COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                                                                    (dollars in thousands)


                                             FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                   MARCH 28, 2003                          MARCH 29, 2002
                                          ----------------------------------       ----------------------------------
                                           MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH         MERRILL LYNCH      MERRILL LYNCH
                                            PREFERRED         PREFERRED             PREFERRED          PREFERRED
                                          CAPITAL TRUST IV   FUNDING IV, L.P.      CAPITAL TRUST IV   FUNDING IV, L.P.
                                          ----------------  ----------------       ----------------  ----------------
<S>                                       <C>               <C>                    <C>               <C>
Earnings                                    $  7,340           $  8,567              $  7,340           $  8,591
                                            ========           ========              ========           ========



Fixed charges                               $      -           $      -              $      -           $      -

Preferred securities distribution
  requirements                                 7,120              7,340                 7,120              7,340
                                            --------           --------              --------           --------

Total combined fixed charges and
  preferred securities distributions        $  7,120           $  7,340              $  7,120           $  7,340
                                            ========           ========              ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to combined
  fixed charges and preferred
  securities distributions                      1.03               1.17                  1.03               1.17





</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Gary C. Loraditch, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 12, 2005
Electronic Treasury Financial Manual (ETFM) and the USSGL update

5-22-14

Jack DeGrange

Enterprise Product Management Division

*

ETFM
        - Manages and publishes TFM content;
        - Cloud-based web content management system;
        - Out of the Box product Adobe CQ configured for our needs;
        - Running on the Amazon cloud.
        - http://tfm.fiscal.treasury.gov/home.html

*

Improvements
        - Internal
        - Rules-based work flow;
        - Cross-Assistant Commissioner area change management and governance;
        - Electronic approval process;
        - Audit Trails.
        - External
        - New user interface
        - Full text and metadata searches
        - Search Summaries, similar pages, and filtering.

*

Current USSGL website

*

Current USSGL website

*

Current USSGL website

*

USSGL Part 1
        - Breadcrumbs
        - USSGL Part Title
        - USSGL Part Subtitle
        - Part 1 Entire File (PDF)
        - Tag for Revised content
        - Transmittal Letter in native formats
        - Links to corresponding anchor for each section
        - Section title with entire PDF file
        - Cover page in 2 formats (No Word File)

Annotated Notes

B

A

Volume 1-Supplements

Left Navigation:

*

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

1

A

B

Advanced Search

*

Advanced Search Results

*

Timeline of Project
        - May 2014 – Design / Approval
        - June 2014 - Development
        - July 2014 – Testing
        - August 2014 - Production

*

Questions

*
EXHIBIT 23

                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Fleet Financial Group, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-19425, 33-25872, 33-65230, 33-48818, 33-56061, 33-62367, 33-58933, 33-64635,
33-59139, 333-16037 and 333-44517) on Form S-8, the registration statements
(Nos. 333-00701, 333-37231, 333-43625 and 33-36707) on Form S-3, and the
registration statements (Nos. 33-58573, 33-58933 and 333-42247) on Form S-4 of
Fleet Financial Group, Inc. of our report dated January 15, 1998, relating to
the consolidated balance sheets of Fleet Financial Group, Inc. as of December
31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the 1997 Annual Report
to Shareholders of Fleet Financial Group, Inc., and has been incorporated by
reference on Form 10-K of of Fleet Financial Group, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 1997.


                                                       /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 18, 1998
No. 57550.

#### China Fur Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protest 937003-G (San Francisco).

*269Opinion by

Olivee, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Fobd, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
[Cite as State v. Meador, 123 Ohio St.3d 450, 2009-Ohio-5861.] 

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. MEADOR, 

APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT. 

[Cite as State v. Meador, 123 Ohio St.3d 450, 2009-Ohio-5861.] 

Discretionary cross-appeal accepted and cause remanded to the court of appeals 

for consideration of an assignment of error. 

(No. 2009-0884 — Submitted October 20, 2009 — Decided November 10, 2009.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Warren County, No. CA2008-03-042, 

2009-Ohio-2195. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is not accepted. 

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is accepted. 

{¶ 3} The judgment of the court of appeals holding as moot the 

assignment of error in which appellant below challenged the sufficiency of the 

evidence is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for 

consideration of that assignment of error. 

 MOYER, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 

__________________ 

 Rachel A. Hutzel, Warren County Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael 

Greer, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant and cross-appellee. 

 Fred S. Miller; and Repper, Pagan & Cook, Ltd., and Christopher J. 

Pagan, for appellee and cross-appellant. 

______________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      494,597
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      6,186
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          65,996
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        71,970
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 638,749
<COMMON>                                        34,163
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      108,292
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             73,166
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 215,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,267
<PREFERRED>                                     10,819
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           165,280
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  33,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    6,300
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         85
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    14
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 182,863
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  638,749
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      331,847
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            14,715
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     276,347
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     291,062
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         40,785
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               3,819
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  44,604
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        15,436
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,168
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,469
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   26,699
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        20,225
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       13,590
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          66,745
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.74
        

</TABLE>
No. 51634.

#### Protests 95993-K, etc., of Amdelta Leather Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Molltson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIGUEL ANGEL DIAZ

Petitioner,

vs.

 JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES,

EDWARD MCELROY, NEW YORK

DISTRICT DIRECTOR FOR

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION

SERVICE, KENNETH ELWOOD,

PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA

DISTRICT DIRECTOR FOR

IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION

SERVICE, IMMIGRATION AND

NATURALIZATION SERVICE

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CIVIL ACTION NO.02-4318

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of the Respondents

in the above-captioned matter. 

 

STEPHEN J. BRITT

Assistant United States Attorney 

615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250 

Philadelphia, PA 19106

(215) 861-8443

Dated: July 10, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-04454-JCJ Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and

correct copy of the foregoing to be served by first-class United

States mail, postage prepaid, upon the following: 

Tatiana S. Aristova, Esquire

Law Office of John Gallagher

1760 Market Street

Suite 1100

Philadelphia, PA 19103

 

 

STEPHEN J. BRITT

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: July 10, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-04454-JCJ Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYL VANIA

JACQUELINE DRINKS, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 02-CV -4352

Plaintiff,

v.

LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION

MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS,

Defendant.

pursuant to Rule 41(a)(I) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that the abovecaptioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and without costs or fees to either

party

_A~{

SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

SIDNEY L. GOLD & ASSOCIATES, P .C.

1835 Market Street -Suite 515

Philadelphia, P A 19103

(215) 569-1999

~~~~~~f~~~~

Stephen Girard Building

21 South 12th Street

9th Floor

Philadelphia, P A 19107

Attorney for Defendant Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:02-cv-04352-JF Document 12 Filed 05/10/2004 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL BAKER, et al., ) 2:04-cv-0549-GEB-GGH

)

Plaintiffs, ) ORDER

)

v. )

)

ARAMARK UNIFORM AND CAREER )

APPAREL, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

 )

Pursuant to the parties’ request in the stipulation filed

September 6, 2005, the final pretrial conference in this action is

continued to October 3, 2005, at 1:30 p.m. A joint pretrial statement

shall be filed no later than September 26, 2005.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 Dated: September 7, 2005

/s/ Garland E. Burrell, Jr.

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00549-DAD Document 144 Filed 09/08/05 Page 1 of 1
REVISED INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT ID Number: P-04-0153

ENGINEER: Hall/WRL/CLH PV (kg/yr):
SUBMITTER:

USE:

OTHER USES:

MSDS: Label: General Eqp.: Respirator:
Health Effects: TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials):

CRSS (12/11/2003): Chemical Category:
Molecular Formula:

VP:
S-H 2 O:

MW: Phys State:

Consumer Use:

SAT (12/12/2003): Groundwater: Health:

Eco: PBT Potential:

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING:

ASSUMPTIONS:

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW?REVISED INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT ID Number: P-04-0153

PROC/USE:

Site/Location: Days/yr:

Process Description:

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.):

WATER: 1) 10.4 kg/site-day over Days/year
and 2) Worst: 2.4 kg/site-day over Days/year Typical: 0.24 kg/site-day over Days/year

from:

to: Basis:

AIR: negligible

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE Tot. # of workers: Days/yr:

Inhalation: mg/day over Days/yr Number of workers with inhalation exposure: Basis:

Inhalation Monitoring Data Review 1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit, or data not specific to industry): 2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day?
OR b) Hazard rating for health of 2 or greater? **Inhalation monitoring data desired?**

Dermal:
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 46 Filed 04/09/07 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 46 Filed 04/09/07 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 46 Filed 04/09/07 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 46 Filed 04/09/07 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 46 Filed 04/09/07 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 46 Filed 04/09/07 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 46 Filed 04/09/07 Page 7 of 7
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50987 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JOSEPH MICHAEL MCFARLAND

, also known as Joseph “Joey” Michael McFarland,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:15

- CR

- 68

- 1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joseph Michael

McFarland has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance

with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632

F.3d 2 29 (5th Cir. 2011). McFarland h a s not filed a response. We have
reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50987 Document: 00514121687 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017No. 16

- 50987

2 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review . Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave
to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50987 Document: 00514121687 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
```
Dislocated Workers: Proposed Re-employment Assistance Program (Letter
Report, 11/12/93, GAO/HRD-94-61).

A proposed Department of Labor re-employment assistance program would
target workers who lose their jobs as a result of the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)--either through rising imports or through
plant relocations to Canada and Mexico.  The proposed program basically
replicates the existing Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program but
sets new eligibility criteria for NAFTA-affected workers and changes the
certification process.  The proposed bridge program to help
NAFTA-affected workers, however, suffers from many of the same
shortcomings that have plagued TAA. GAO questions two major changes that
the bridge proposal makes to the basic TAA approach.  First, changes to
expedite the certification process would require Labor to complete a TAA
certification in 30 days, a task that has previously taken 60 days.
Second, although eliminating the training waiver allowed under TAA is a
positive step, other services, such as job search assistance, should be
included as allowable training activities for receiving income support
assistance.  If NAFTA is passed, Labor should address these concerns as
it develops the implementing regulations.

--------------------------- Indexing Terms -----------------------------

 REPORTNUM:  HRD-94-61
     TITLE:  Dislocated Workers: Proposed Re-employment Assistance 
             Program
      DATE:  11/12/93
   SUBJECT:  Eligibility criteria
             Employment or training programs
             Training utilization
             Eligibility determinations
             Full employment policies
             Human resources training
             Income maintenance programs
             International economic relations
             State-administered programs
             Aid for training or employment
IDENTIFIER:  North American Free Trade Agreement
             NAFTA
             Trade Adjustment Assistance Program
             DOL Economic Dislocation and Worker Adjustment Assistance 
             Program
             Canada
             Mexico
             North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
             
************************************************************************

We regret that the full text of this item is presently unavailable.

See the GAO FAQ - Section 2.0 for printed copy ordering information.
The FAQ is automatically retrieved with all WAIS search results or 
can be obtained by sending e-mail to: [email protected]
```
No. 56978.

#### American Express Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 960916-G, etc. (Boston).

*420Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in ail material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
----

----

III Oznámení

Komise

----

EVROPSKÝ ÚŘAD PRO BOJ PROTI PODVODŮM (OLAF)

Ředitel útvaru „Vyšetřování a operace II“ (OLAF.B)

(AD 14 – č. j. KOM/2006/10031)

a ředitel útvaru „Operační a politická podpora“ (OLAF.C)

(AD 14 – č. j. KOM/2006/10032)

(2006/C 238 A/01)

Kdo jsme:

Evropský úřad pro boj proti podvodům (OLAF). Boj proti podvodům ohrožujícím finanční zájmy Evropských společenství má pro důvěryhodnost evropského projektu zásadní význam. Všechny orgány EU jej tedy řadí mezi nejvyšší priority. Úřad OLAF je jak vyšetřovacím útvarem, tak generálním ředitelstvím Komise pověřeným navrhováním a prováděním politiky boje proti podvodům.

Co nabízíme:

Zájemci musí mít:

Ředitel bude vybrán a jmenován Komisí v souladu s jejími výběrovými a náborovými postupy. Platové a pracovní podmínky odpovídají podmínkám stanoveným ve služebním řádu pro úředníky Evropských společenství ve třídě AD 14. Komise uplatňuje politiku rovných příležitostí.

Úplný popis pracovní náplně, podmínky pro výběr a podrobnosti k zasílání přihlášek naleznete na adrese:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm.

Odkaz na on-line přihlášku:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html.

V případě technických problémů zašlete e-mail na:

admin-management-online@ec.europa.eu.

Datum uzávěrky pro registraci je 6. listopadu 2006. Po 12:00 hod. bruselského času (poledne) již nebude možná registrace on-line.

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHARLES A. DEBOW, JR., : 

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

 :

 v. :

 :

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of the :

Social Security Administration, : NO. 05-5168

Defendant. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 20 day of September 2006, upon consideration of the parties’ cross- th

motions for summary judgment, and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of

United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, the Commissioner’s Objections to the Report

and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 

2. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 12) is GRANTED to the

extent that the matter is remanded for further proceedings. 

3. The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 18) is DENIED.

4. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner to the Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further

proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter.

BY THE COURT:

/S/LEGROME D. DAVIS

Legrome D. Davis, J.

Case 2:05-cv-05168-LDD Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 1