alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 58942.

protest 244875-K (New York).

#### Carole Stupell, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of**

**Title 18 Of The United States Code**

 

I, J. Patrick Spainhour, the Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  J. Patrick Spainhour |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | J.  Patrick Spainhour     |
|   | November 14,  2008   |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALONZO PATRICK : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : No. 04-4968

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART :

Commissioner of the Social Security :

Administration

ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of March, 2006, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion

for Summary Judgment or, In the Alternative, Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand (Document No.

8), the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document No. 12), the plaintiff’s

response, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith

Angell (Document No. 20), and after a thorough and independent review of the record, and

the parties having advised the Court that they waive filing objections to the Magistrate

Judge’s Report and Recommendation, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report is APPROVED and her Recommendation is

ADOPTED;

2. The plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

3. The defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

4. The decision of Commissioner of Social Security is VACATED and this case

is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and

Recommendation.

 s/ Timothy J. Savage 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:04-cv-04968-TJS Document 21 Filed 03/20/06 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 153 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 153

             To ensure reliable observation of hurricanes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2017

  Mr. Nelson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
             To ensure reliable observation of hurricanes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring the Reliability of Our 
Hurricane Hunter Aircraft Act''.

SEC. 2. HURRICANE HUNTER AIRCRAFT.

    The Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere of the Department of 
Commerce shall secure and maintain secondary backup capability for each 
class of hurricane reconnaissance, research, surveillance, and response 
aircraft sufficient to prevent a single point of failure.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out this Act.
                                 <all>
```
No. 53505.

protests 117283-K, etc. (El Paso, etc.).

#### Henry W. Peabody & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 67829.

#### Glencourt Importing Co. and Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 62/2402, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                          OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        3,251
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          734
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                  0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  26,689
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       14,616
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         14,816
<LOANS>                                     156,222
<ALLOWANCE>                                   1,428
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              202,615
<DEPOSITS>                                  148,992
<SHORT-TERM>                                 10,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                           2,751
<LONG-TERM>                                  17,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                     18,132 
<OTHER-SE>                                   23,543 
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              220,918 
<INTEREST-LOAN>                               2,850
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               672
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                186
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                              3,708
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                            1,580
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            1,887
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                         1,821
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                               1,203
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 826
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                    526
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.12
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  2.8
<LOANS-NON>                                     215
<LOANS-PAST>                                      0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                247
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 869
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                              1,411
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     0
<RECOVERIES>                                      2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                             1,428
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                          1,428
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                               0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                           0
        


</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

[PROPOSED] ORDER ANNULLING BOND AND EXONERATING SURETY

CASE NO. CIV.S.04-0524 WBS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

PHILIP MORRIS USA INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

SOUS, et al.,

Defendants.

NO.: CIV.S.04-0524 WBS

(terminated June 18, 2004)

[PROPOSED] ORDER

ANNULLING BOND AND

EXONERATING SURETY

The Honorable William B. Shubb

Plaintiff Philip Morris USA Inc. requests that the Court annul the bond filed in this

action with regard to the Court’s issuance of a Temporary Restraining Order and Order to

Show Cause re Preliminary Injunction on March 17, 2004 and exonerate the surety with

regard to such bond. The case was terminated on June 18, 2004 and the original purpose

for which security was filed has been resolved without any liability having been incurred.

Good cause having been shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, the Court exonerates the surety bond in the

amount of $1,000, originally posted with the Court by Plaintiff Philip Morris USA Inc. on

March 18, 2004. The bond is annulled and the surety with regard thereto is exonerated. No

notification to terminated parties is required.

DATED: May 2, 2005

Case 2:04-cv-00524-WBS-DAD Document 27 Filed 05/03/05 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extendicare Health Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Melvin A. Rhinelander, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify solely for purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
based on my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Melvin A. Rhinelander
-------------------------------------------------
Melvin A. Rhinelander
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2002


























                                       29
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration # 10812]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Washington (FEMA-1682-DR), dated February 14, 2007. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storms, Landslides, and Mudslides. *Incident Period:*
                         December 14, 2006 through December 15, 2006. *Effective Date:*
                         February 14, 2007. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         April 16, 2007.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 02/14/2007, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of a governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Chelan, Clallam, Clark, Grant, Grays Harbor, Island, King, Klickitat, Lewis, Mason, Pacific, Pend Oreille, Pierce, San Juan, Skagit, Skamania, Snohomish, Thurston, Wahkiakum. The Interest Rates are: PercentOther (Including Non-Profit Organizations) With Credit Available Elsewhere
5.250Businesses and Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is: 10812. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008). Roger B. Garland, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. E7-3088 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with GM on June 7, 2011

FROM: Don Kopinski

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held by phone on June 7, 2011 between GM and EPA

staff. The following people attended:

GM: Barbara Kiss, Steve Fornetti

EPA: Angela Cullen, Tony Fernandez, Don Kopinski

The discussion focused on loose engines in the HD GHG program.
Before the Second Division,

November 2, 1960

No. 64824.

#### Illfelder Importing Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/13882 (Portland, Oreg.).

*357Opinion by

La whence, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of miniature knives similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 10, C.D. 2145), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE>   
          INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY                                           EXHIBIT 12.1

          Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
<CAPTION>
         

                                                     YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                             ---------------------------------------------     
                                               1996              1995              1994
                                             ---------         ---------         ---------
                                                        (Thousands of Dollars)
<S>                                          <C>               <C>               <C>
Earnings, as defined:
     Net income                              $122,588          $106,273          $103,823
     Income taxes                              67,266            53,568            54,720
     Fixed charges, as below                   48,570            51,778            48,302
                                             ---------         ---------         ---------
         Total earnings, as defined          $238,424          $211,619          $206,845
                                             =========         =========         =========
Fixed charges, as defined:
     Interest charges                        $ 48,407          $ 51,596          $ 48,164
     Rental interest factor                       164               182               138
                                             ---------         ---------         ---------
         Total fixed charges, as defined     $ 48,571          $ 51,778          $ 48,302
                                             =========         =========         =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               4.91              4.09              4.28
                                             =========         =========         =========

</TABLE>
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4294 — Arcelor/SNCFL/CFL Cargo)

(2006/C 258/10)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 9 October 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
Part 2 Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section IV

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Account Attribute Definition Report

Attribute Name Short

Name Attribute Definition Domain SystemChars Reference SuppliedBy

IRC Handout Draft July 2020

Authority Type Code Auth Type Code Distinguishes among the types of budgetary resources, where 

it is not possible to do so by the USSGL Account Number 

Code. For example, the USSGL rescission accounts (USSGL 

accounts 439200 and 439300) do not distinguish between 

rescissions of appropriations or contract authority.

B - Borrowing Authority,

C - Contract Authority,

D - Advance Appropriation,

E - Appropriation (Advance 

Funding) available in Prior Year,

F - Appropriation (Advance 

Funding) available from 

Subsequent Year,

P - Appropriation (excluding 

Advance Funding),

R - Reappropriation,

S - Spending Authority from 

Offsetting Collections,

X - Transfer of Borrowing 

Authority Converted to Cash

1/A OMB Circ. 

No. A-11, 

TFM 2-4200

Bulk File
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NADINE JOHNSON : CIVIL ACTION

V. : NO. 02-4489

NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS INC. :

 

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: this 8th day of October, 2002, it having been reported

that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the

Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this

Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: ___________________________ 

 Rita L. Polkowski

Deputy Clerk

 

 

Civ 2 (8/2000)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-04489-WY Document 9 Filed 10/08/2002 Page 1 of 1
# Beginning

New Budgetary Authority (Gross), Detail[1]

[1] For purposes of this scenario, budget authority is classified as discretionary.
Before the First Division,

December 31, 1943

No. 49093.

#### Protest 104752-K of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the opera glasses in question are similar to those the subject of *Wool-worth*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 1, C. D. 74), those entered or withdrawn prior to the French Trade Agreement (T. D. 48316) were held dutiable at 45 percent under para*235graph 228 (b), and those imported subsequent to said trade agreement were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 228 (b), as amended.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tongli Pharmaceuticals
(USA), Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
Mingli Yao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      November 15, 2010
                By:
                /s/ Mingli YaoName:
      Mingli YaoTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer(principal
      executive officer)
# Bulletin No. 2022-10

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-10	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2022

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-10	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2022
# Supplement (Web)

Below is a list of supplemental changes to the C570 published July 1, 2023. When reviewing the original C570, the below changes should be considered in order to view the most up to date changes. Please note that only the action changes are  populated for the applicable company. All other elements in grey remain consistent with the original C570.

# Legend
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-04-1998
<CASH>                                        2,498,00
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               42,927,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,287,000
<INVENTORY>                                 95,113,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           140,805,000
<PP&E>                                      29,881,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,690,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             192,302,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       62,918,000
<BONDS>                                     24,424,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       171,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  89,305,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               192,302,000
<SALES>                                    128,526,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           128,526,000
<CGS>                                       93,720,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               93,720,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                86,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,046,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,528,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 4,225,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          7,303,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                266,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 7,037,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41
        

</TABLE>
No. 47818.

#### Protests 998684-G, etc., of Frankel Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in all material respects to the merchandise covered by Abstract 47109, and in view of the further stipulation that they are not composed in any part of synthetic resin or ivory, that they do not imitate pearls, and are not imitation pearl beads, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1503 by virtue of T. D. 49458, as claimed.
# AVS



# Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action WOrXsheet with S6 QPM# AIR-ANM.Q30-F7 Date: April 19, 2010 Revision 1 

# Record ofContacts FDMS Docket No. FAA-29CtWIG ,.- 

## 0"(,S'6 With whom outside theFAA has this proposal been discussed (f.g., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Organization Perso~Contacted Date Air Transport Association Mark Lopez I Fob 18,2010 Boeing Todd Esselstyn I March 5,2010

UNCONTROLLEO COPY WHEf'l DOWNLOADED Check the Master Lisl to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use I