alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3960 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3960

                     One Hundred Eighteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
         the third day of January, two thousand and twenty four

                                 An Act

 
To amend title 35, United States Code, to provide a good faith exception 
to the imposition of fines for false assertions and certifications, and 
                           for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. GOOD FAITH EXCEPTION TO THE IMPOSITION OF CERTAIN FINES.
    Title 35, United States Code, is amended--
        (1) in section 41(j), by inserting ``, unless the entity shows 
    that the assertion was made in good faith,'' before ``be subject''; 
    and
        (2) in section 123(f), by inserting ``, unless the entity shows 
    that the certification was made in good faith,'' before ``be 
    subject''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF OPERATINGOFFICER PURSUANT TOSECTION 302OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, David C. Treinen, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewed this Annual Report onForm 10-K of International Aluminum Corporation;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.               The registrant’s other certifyingofficers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.               designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

b.              evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

c.               disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a.               all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and

b.              any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date:  September 21, 2004 | DAVID C. TREINEN        |
|-------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                                | David C. Treinen        |
|                                | President and           |
|                                | Chief Operating Officer |

 

----
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 1 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 2 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 3 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 4 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 5 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 6 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 7 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 8 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 9 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 10 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 11 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 12 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 13 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 14 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 15 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 16 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 17 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 18 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 19 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 20 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 21 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 22 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 23 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 24 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 25 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 26 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 27 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 28 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 29 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 30 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 31 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 32 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 33 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 34 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 35 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 36 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 37 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 38 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 39 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 40 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 41 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 42 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 43 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 44 of 45
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-8 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 45 of 45
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 36 (Wednesday, February 23, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 10084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3976]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending January 22, 2011

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2006-24629.
    Date Filed: January 18, 2011.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify 
Scope: Febuary 8, 2011.
    Description: Application of Yangtze River Express Airlines Co., 
Ltd. requesting an exemption and amended foreign air carrier permit 
authorizing it to engage in charter foreign air transportation of 
property and mail between a point or points in the People's Republic of 
China, on the one hand, and a point or points in the United States, on 
the other hand; and a statement of authorization for 54 one-way third/
fourth freedom cargo charter flights on a Shanghai (PVG)--Qingdao, 
China (TAO)--Los Angeles (LAX)--Shanghai (PVG) routing.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2011-3976 Filed 2-22-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
# sec5_scnp_2019

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2018
No. 57977.

#### Prouvost Lefebvre of Rhode Island, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 192910-K, etc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159. Said T. D. 53159 was issued following the decision in *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 168, C. D. 1365), affirmed in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), wherein the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content under T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case. '
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

USSG

L Acct. USSGL Account Title

Anticipated

Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/ End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Year

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Nonfed

Trading 

Prtnr

Trading 

Partner 

Main

PY

Adj DEFC

Pgm 

Rpt 

Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account 

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

415730 Authority Made Available From Appropriations Previously 

Precluded From Obligation

N B D E D/C D P/X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D ES U N U X/N

415900 Repayment of Repayable Advances - Current-Year Authority N B C E D/C B/P M X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D ES/ET E/U N U N

415901 Repayment of Repayable Advances - Prior-Year Balances N B C E D/C B/P M B/P/X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D ES/ET E/U N U N

416612 Allocations of Realized Authority - To Be Transferred From 

Invested Balances - Prior Year

N B D E D/C P D F ### #### X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D ET E/F/U N U N

416712 Allocations of Realized Authority - Transferred From 

Invested Balances - Prior Year

N B D E D/C P D F ### #### X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D ET E/F/U N U N

417400 Transfers - Current-Year Borrowing Authority Converted to 

Cash

N B D E D/C X D/M F ### #### B/P/X 1 or 3 

character 

D EG/EP/ES E/F/U N U/E X/K/N

426900 Actual Collections of Voluntary Insurance Enrollment FeesBusiness Type FeesN B D E D D N X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D/R EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U N U/E X/K/N

740000 Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors N P C E D/C N/Z CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

740100 Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Changes in Accounting 

Principles

N P C E D/C N/Z CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

740500 Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors -Years 

Preceding the Prior-Year

N P C E D/C N/Z CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

Fiscal Year 2022 Reporting

Section IV

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Attributes to Accounts Report

U S S G L A C C O U N T USSGL ATTRIBUTES B U L K F I L E A T T R I B U T E S T A S A T T R I B U T E S

Bulletin No. 2022-04 Draft December 2021 IRC Handout
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Grace Lawrence :

 :

Plaintiff : 

 :

 v. : 02-4440

 :

Trans Union LLC :

 :

Defendant :

O R D E R

Defendant filed a motion to supplement record with new available deposition testimony of

third party (Docket #38). Plaintiff substantively responded to the supplementary filing, effectively

waiving the right to contest its filing (Docket #39).

AND NOW, this day of November 2003, Defendant’s motion to supplement record

with new available deposition testimony of third party (Docket #38) is GRANTED.

 

ANITA B. BRODY, J.

 Copies FAXED on to: Copies MAILED on to:

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 40 Filed 11/24/2003 Page 1 of 1
IC 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1532 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2017 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

AN ACT 

To disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle 

for life an individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony involving human trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1532 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Human Trafficking 

3 on Our Roads Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. LIFETIME DISQUALIFICATION WITHOUT REIN5 STATEMENT. 

6 Section 31310(d) of title 49, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘CONTROLLED

9 SUBSTANCE VIOLATIONS’’ and inserting ‘‘LIFETIME

10 DISQUALIFICATION WITHOUT REINSTATEMENT’’; 

11 (2) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting 

12 ‘‘(1) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE VIOLATIONS.—The 

13 Secretary’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(2) HUMAN TRAFFICKING VIOLATIONS.—The 

16 Secretary shall disqualify from operating a commer17 cial motor vehicle for life an individual who uses a 

18 commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony in19 volving an act or practice described in paragraph (9) 

20 of section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection 

21 Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9)).’’. 

Passed the Senate September 14, 2017. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RONALD WILSON,

NO. CIV. S-04-633 LKK/CMK

Plaintiff,

v.

PIER 1 IMPORTS (US), INC;

and MELLON/PIER 1 PROPERTIES

LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I,

Defendants.

 /

STEVE EIDEN,

NO. CIV. S-04-977 LKK/CMK

Plaintiff,

v.

HOME DEPOT USA, INC., dba

HOME DEPOT #6609; and HD

PROPERTIES OF MARYLAND,

Defendants.

 /

////

////

Case 2:04-cv-00633-LKK -CMK Document 126 Filed 07/18/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

BYRON CHAPMAN,

NO. CIV. S-04-1339 LKK CMK

Plaintiff,

O R D E R

v.

PIER 1 IMPORTS, et al.,

Defendants.

 /

The Pretrial Conference in the above-captioned cases were

vacated pending the resolution of cross-motions for summary

judgment. The motions have since been resolved and the court sets

the following dates for Pretrial Conference:

1. Eiden v. Home Depot, 04-977 September 18, 2006 at 1:30 p.m.

2. Wilson v. Pier 1, 04-633 September 18, 2006 at 2:00 p.m.

3. Chapman v. Pier 1, 04-1339 September 18, 2006 at 2:30 p.m.

The parties are referred to the court's Status Orders and the

local rules for the timing and contents of their

pretrial statements. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: July 17, 2006.

Case 2:04-cv-00633-LKK -CMK Document 126 Filed 07/18/06 Page 2 of 2
# IRC Handouts 09 25 18

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts 09 25 18

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold" DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts 09 25 18
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementon Form S-8 (No. 33-57109) of International Aluminum Corporation of our reportdated September 2, 2005 relating to the financial statements, management’sassessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingand the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by referenceof our report dated September 2, 2005 relating to the financial statementschedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

 

LosAngeles, California

September7, 2005

 

----
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4016 

To amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act to authorize the Secretary of 

the Interior to expend amounts in the Colorado River Dam fund, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Ms. SINEMA (for herself, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Mr. KELLY, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. 

PADILLA, and Ms. BUTLER) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Boulder Canyon Project Act to authorize 

the Secretary of the Interior to expend amounts in the 

Colorado River Dam fund, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Help Hoover Dam 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO EXPEND AMOUNTS. 

7 Section 2 of the Act of December 21, 1928 (43 

8 U.S.C. 617, et seq.; commonly known as the ‘‘Boulder 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4016 IS

1 Canyon Project Act’’), is amended by adding at the end 

2 the following: 

3 ‘‘(f) The Secretary of the Interior is authorized to 

4 expend moneys in the fund, including moneys in account 

5 XXXR5656P1, that were and hereafter are recovered on 

6 a non-reimbursable basis, for any authorized activity, in7 cluding operations, maintenance, investigation and clean8 up actions, and capital improvements, within the Boulder 

9 Canyon Project at Hoover Dam or on land used for the 

10 construction and operation of the Hoover Dam, subject 

11 to the review and approval of the Boulder Canyon Project 

12 contractors as identified in the Hoover Power Allocation 

13 Act of 2011 (Public Law 112–72).’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 51661.

#### Protests 48802-K, etc., of Cohn & Rosenberger, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020) and *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867). In accordance therewith the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

March 17, 1949

No. 52940.

#### Best & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 144334-K (New York).

Opinion by

Bao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/20/22
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

POP ART ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiffs, : NO. 05-5721

 :

v. :

:

GOODEN, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of February, 2006, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff

shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to show cause why this matter should not be

dismissed for want of prosecution.

BY THE COURT:

 S/ James T. Giles 

 J.

Case 2:05-cv-05721-JG Document 3 Filed 02/06/2006 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018134EN.01002001.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2018 — Zink v Commission

(Case T-338/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Expatriation allowance - No payment of the allowance for a number of years following an administrative error - Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Reasonable period of time))

(2018/C 134/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Richard Zink (Bamako, Mali) (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2016, Zink v Commission (F-77/15, EU:F:2016:74), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Zink

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2016, Zink v Commission (F-77/15); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 11 April 2016, Zink v Commission (F-77/15);

| 2. | Annuls the decision of 23 July 2014 of the Office for ‘Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements’ (PMO) of the European Commission to the extent that, pursuant to that decision, the Commission had refused to pay Mr Richard Zink the expatriation allowance relating to the period between 1 September 2007 and 30 April 2009; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls the decision of 23 July 2014 of the Office for ‘Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements’ (PMO) of the European Commission to the extent that, pursuant to that decision, the Commission had refused to pay Mr Richard Zink the expatriation allowance relating to the period between 1 September 2007 and 30 April 2009;

| 3. | Dismisses, as to the remainder, the action brought before the Civil Service Tribunal, registered as Case F-77/15; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses, as to the remainder, the action brought before the Civil Service Tribunal, registered as Case F-77/15;

| 4. | Orders the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings on appeal and at first instance. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission to pay the costs of the proceedings on appeal and at first instance.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.

1

---