alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018013EN.01001401.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2017 — Stada Arzneimittel v EUIPO — Urgo recherche innovation et développement (Immunostad)

(Case T-403/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Application for the EU word mark Immunostad - Earlier national word mark ImmunoStim - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the trade marks - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and Article 60(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Non-negligible part of the relevant public - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 013/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stada Arzneimittel AG (Bad Vilbel, Germany) (represented by: R. Kaase and J.-C. Plate, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: initially, D. Botis and, subsequently, D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Urgo recherche innovation et développement, formerly Société de développement et de recherche industrielle, then Vivatech (Chenôve, France) (represented by: A. Sion and A. Delafond-Nielsen, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 April 2016 (Case R 863/2015-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between Vivatech and Stada Arzneimittel.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Stada Arzneimittel AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Stada Arzneimittel AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.

1

---
-                          Home                     
-                          Data Products                     
-                 State Fact Sheets            

# State Fact Sheets

The ERS State Fact Sheets provide information on population, income, poverty, food security, education, employment/unemployment, farm characteristics, farm financial indicators, top commodities, and agricultural exports. Links to available county-level data are included where applicable.

Enter the App

The State Fact Sheets were updated September 5, 2024 to add average (2021–23) household food insecurity and very low food security estimates, and 2023 farm financial indicators and top commodities.

For details on updates and revisions, see the documentation.

Select a State or the U.S. summary:

- Overview
- Documentation

-  Rural Economy & Population 
-  ERS Celebrates World Statistics Day 2020 
-  Farm Sector Income & Finances 
-  Business & Industry 
-  Employment & Education 
-  Rural Poverty & Well-Being 
-  ERS Coronavirus (COVID-19) Media Resources 
-  Rural Classifications 
-  Population & Migration 

**Last updated:** Thursday, September 05, 2024

**For more information, contact:**Kathleen  Kassel
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TRUSTEES OF VALLEY CARPET

LAYERS INDUSTRY TRUST FUNDS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-04-0573 LKK GGH

vs.

SOLO FLOORING, INC.,

Defendant. ORDER

__________________________________/

On April 22, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed.

 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v.

United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are

reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.

1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-00573-LKK -GGH Document 19 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Proposed Findings and Recommendations filed April 22, 2005, are

ADOPTED; and

2. Plaintiffs’ motion for entry of default judgment is GRANTED in part and

DENIED in part. Judgment is rendered in the form of damages only, in the total amount of

$7,069.85, which reflects unpaid contributions, attorneys’ fees and costs. Plaintiff’s request for

injunctive relief is denied.

DATED: August 17, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

trustees573.jo

Case 2:04-cv-00573-LKK -GGH Document 19 Filed 08/18/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT



All of the subsidiaries listed below are included in the consolidated financial
statements.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                           Percentage of           Organized
                                          Voting Securities        Under the
Incorporated                            Owned by Registrant         Laws of
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                             <C>            <C>
IRT-II Trust                                    100%           Massachusetts (1)
Instron Realty Trust                            100%           Massachusetts (1)
Instron Japan Company, Ltd.                     100%           Massachusetts (1)
Instron Asia, Ltd.                              100%           Massachusetts (1)
Instron Canada Inc.                             100%           Canada (1)
Instron Foreign Sales Corporation               100%           Jamaica (1)
Equipamentos Cientificos Instron, Ltda.         100%           Brazil (1)
Instron Limited                                 100%           United Kingdom (2)
Instron S.A.                                    100%           France (2)
Instron Proprietary, Ltd.                       100%           Australia (2)
Instron International, Ltd.                     100%           United Kingdom (2)
Severn Furnaces, Ltd.                           100%           United Kingdom (2)
Instron Singapore Pte Limited                   100%           Singapore (1)
Instron Holdings, Ltd.                          100%           United Kingdom (1)
Instron Wolpert GmbH                            100%           Germany (2)
Instron Korea Co. Ltd.                          100%           Korea (1)
Instron Schenck Testing Systems                 100%           Delaware (1)
Instron Schenck Testing Systems - GmbH          100%           Germany (3)
</TABLE>

(1)  Subsidiaries of Instron Corporation (a Massachusetts corporation).

(2)  Subsidiaries of Instron Holdings Limited (United Kingdom).

(3)  Subsidiary of Instron GmbH
combustionsurvey - Additional information re reconsideration 

 

-----Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 07/16/2011 03:29PM -----

To: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Toni Jones/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Shannon Broome" <sbroome@pacbell.net> 

Date: 07/15/2011 09:11PM 

Subject: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Additional information re reconsideration 

(See attached file: Additional Information Submittal for Reconsideration.pdf)

Dear Mr. Shrager and Ms. Jones:

Please find attached the Auto Industry Forum’s submittal regarding additional information regarding 

reconsideration of the Boiler MACT and CISWI rules. Please contact me with any questions. Thanks

<<...>> 

Best regards, 

Shannon S. Broome 

5001 Proctor Avenue 

Oakland, CA 94618 

510-985-1710 (ph)/510-816-1710 (c)

This communication (including any attachments) is intended to be privileged under applicable law and is only for 

the recipient(s) listed above. Any review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited.

===================================================== 

Circular 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with IRS requirements, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax 

advice contained in this communication is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used by any 

taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding any federal tax penalties. Any legal advice expressed in this message is 

being delivered to you solely for your use in connection with the matters addressed herein and may not be 

relied upon by any other person or entity or used for any other purpose without our prior written consent. 

============================================================================ 

= 

From: Brian Shrager <Shrager.Brian@epamail.epa.gov>

To: <combustionsurvey@erg.com>

Date: 7/16/2011 3:30 PM

Subject: Additional information re reconsideration

Attachments: Additional Information Submittal for Reconsideration.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\GGibson\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4E21AE7DDO... 8/2/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

JOHN J. BUCKSHAW : NO. 02-4450

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the Rule 16

Preliminary Pretrial Conference scheduled for November 12, 2002, is CONTINUED. It will be

rescheduled at a later time, if appropriate.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04450-LP Document 6 Filed 11/05/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 60786.

#### Pennsylvania Saw Corp. and D. C. Andrews *v.*United States,

protest 279406-K (Baltimore).

*512Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When this case was called for hearing, the official papers were received in evidence. In the collector’s report, it is stated that the liquidator was in error in assessing the additional duty but that, since the 90-day period within which the collector may modify his decision had expired, the protest was forwarded to the court for action. An examination of the laboratory report showed that the sample in question did not contain any alloying element in sufficient quantity to subject it to the additional duty under paragraph 305, as modified, *supra.*On the uncontroverted facts of record, it was held that the items of merchandise in question should not have been subjected to the additional duty, as claimed.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 13 - 00522 - CR

PATRICK EVANS APPELLANT
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

---------- FROM CRIMINAL DISTRI CT COURT NO. 2 OF TA RRANT COUNTY

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- A jury convicted Appellant Patrick Evans of capital murder in 2007 , and the conviction was affirmed on appeal in 2009. See E vans v. State , No. 08

- 07

- 00213

- CR, 2009 WL 2462538, at *11 (Tex. App.

–– El Paso Aug. 12, 2009, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication)

. On October 22, 2013, we received Appellant ’s pro se “N otice of A ppeal of Recent Motions.” In response, we sent a

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 letter to Appellant advising him of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this appeal because it appeared he was attempting to appea l a judgment that had already been affirmed once on appeal. Appellant replied with a letter asking
to withdraw his notice of appeal , which we construe as a motion to dismiss the appeal. It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefo re we dismiss the appeal. See Tex . R. App. P. 42.2(a), 43.2(f) ; Willis v. State , No. 02

- 11

- 00 309

- CR, 2011 WL 4345301, at *1 (Tex. App

– - Fort Worth Sept. 15, 2011, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication)

. PER CURIAM PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ. DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: December 19, 2013
No. 62529.

#### Ben Goodman & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 327693-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Case No. 13,133a.

#### SMOOT v. WASHINGTON.

[2 Hayw. & H. 122.] 2

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Sept. 19, 1853.

Municipal Corporations — Grading Streets.

The power of grading and regrading the public streets of Washington must be considered as a continuing power in the corporation, to be exercised whenever and as often as the health, improvement and prosperity of the city makes it necessary.

[This was an action at law by Joseph Smoot against the corporation of Washington.] _

Jos. H. Bradley and W. D. Davidge, for plaintiff.

James M. Carlisle, for the corporation.

BY

THE COURT.

The whole subject of the power and responsibility of the corporation, touching the grading and regrading of the streets in Washington, was involved in this case. There were cited a great many authorities on both sides from the reports of the highest courts in the several states, and of the supreme court -of the United States, as well as English authorities. The court pronounced an oral opinion. The following conclusions were reduced to writing by the presiding judge: “The doctrine laid down by this court in the case of Devaughn v. Patterson (not reported) is affirmed and reasserted. The power of grading and regrading the public streets of Washington must be considered as a continuing power in the corporation, to be exercised whenever and as often as the health, improvement and prosperity of the city makes it necessary.” That the graduation and regraduation by said corporation cannot be considered in the nature of a compact with the proprietor cf the property fronting thereon, that it shall always so continue unchanged; and any such agreement to fetter or clog the exercise of legislative power would be void. That by the conveyance of the streets and squares, &c., from the commissioners in 1796, to the United States possessed an unqualified fee-simple in the streets and public squares exclusively, to which the corporation succeeded, so far as the power to grade and regrade is concerned. That though the right of ingress and egress in the proprietor of property fronting on a street is impaired by such regrading, it must be considered a loss in the nature of consequential damages, and not within the principle of the provision contained in the constitution, forbidding the taking private property for public use without just compensation. It is damnum absque injuria, for which no action lies. That there can be no breach of faith ascribed to the corporation in changing the graduation, because they had no power to make any pledge that it should always so continue. The foregoing propositions must however be considered as made with the qualification that the jury shall find from the evidence that such claim became necessary for the health, improvement and prosperity of the city, and was not capriciously or unskillfully made; also that the same was made in a proper manner, and within the line of said street so graduated.
No. 62523.

#### Beer Stern Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 313175-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Foed, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of narrow woven fabrics of cotton similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Beer Stern Import Corp.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 294, C. D. 1944), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Stephen K. Gartside, Jr., certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Evolving Systems, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ STEPHEN K. GARTSIDE, JR.          |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |
| Stephen K. Gartside, Jr.         |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |
| August 12, 2005                  |

 

----
# sec5_balsh_2020_optional

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2020-21	&"Arial,Bold"&10V BS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10August 2020
Hydration products include:

3CaO•3Al2O3•CaSO4•12H2O,

3CaO•3Al2O3•3CaSO4•32H2O (ettringite),

and Al(OH)3
Part 1, Section I: Chart of Accounts

The Chart of Accounts provides the basic structure for the U.S. Standard General

Ledger (USSGL). It incorporates both proprietary and budgetary accounts. The

proprietary and budgetary sets of general ledger accounts are self-balancing

(the total debits equal total credits). It is important to note that central

agency reporting requires a lower level of detail than the 6-digit USSGL account

numbers provided. Therefore, the USSGL Board developed attributes containing

various domain values that, when added to a basic 6-digit USSGL account, provide

the appropriate level of detail needed for central agency reporting and, in

effect, create new USSGL accounts. See Section IV for attribute definitions and

domain values. It is this lower level of detail, the basic 6-digit USSGL account

plus applicable attribute domain values, that agencies must capture at the

transaction level to (1) comply with USSGL policy, and (2) achieve the desired

result for proper reporting.

The basic 6-digit USSGL accounts are classified as follows:

 100000 Assets

 200000 Liabilities

 300000 Net Position

 400000 Budgetary

 500000 Revenue and Other Financing Sources

 600000 Expenses

 700000 Gains/Losses/Miscellaneous Items

 800000 Memorandum

Agencies may expand this numbering system to as many digits as necessary to

accommodate agency-specific requirements. However, subsidiary accounts must

summarize or “roll-up” to the 6-digit USSGL accounts plus any related

attributes.

In February 1999, the USSGL Board voted to delete summary accounts. However,

agencies may summarize accounts as they find useful. Section headings replace

many of the deleted summary accounts to maintain the integrity of the account

Page 1 of 2
structure.

Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

June 30, 1943

No. 48467.

#### Protests 991432-G, etc., of W. X. Huber Co. et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case 2:05-md-01712-MAM Document 434 Filed 10/13/2009 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-md-01712-MAM Document 434 Filed 10/13/2009 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Indiana Bell
Telephone Company, Incorporated's December 31, 1995 Financial Statements and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             100
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  243,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,900
<INVENTORY>                                      4,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               255,700
<PP&E>                                       3,085,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,892,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,588,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          450,300
<BONDS>                                         85,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       539,600
<OTHER-SE>                                      91,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,558,200
<SALES>                                              0<F2>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,212,400
<CGS>                                                0<F3>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  799,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (2,100)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                13,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                397,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   146,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            250,900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   250,900
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Securities are not material and therefore have not been stated separately in
the financial statements.  This amount is included in the Cash tag.
<F2>Net sales of tangible products is not more than 10% of total operating revenues
and therefore has not been stated separately in the financial statements
pursuant to Regulation S-X, Rule 5-03(b).  This amount is included in the
"Total Revenues" tag.
<F3>Cost of tangible goods sold is included in cost of service and products in  the
financial statements and the "Total Cost" tag, pursuant to Regulation S-X, Rule
5-03(b).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

I, Brian R. Ervine, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Evolving Systems, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of EvolvingSystems, Inc.

 
| /s/ BRIAN R. ERVINE                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                     |
| Brian R. Ervine                                                          |
| Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer |
| November 15, 2004                                                        |

 

----