alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017221EN.01002702.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/27

---

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2017 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-60/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - EIB staff - Appraisal - Career evaluation report - Appraisal year 2011 - Errors of law - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2017/C 221/38)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: initially by: G. Nuvoli and F. Martin, and subsequently by: G. Nuvoli and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015, De Nicola v EIB (F-55/13, EU:F:2015:165) seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

De Nicola

EIB

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (07-014)] 

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of inventions for licensing. 

# SUMMARY:

The invention listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, has been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and is available for licensing. 

# DATES:

February 22, 2007. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Heald, Patent Counsel, Kennedy Space Center, Mail Code CC-A, Kennedy Space Center, FL 32899; telephone (321) 867-7214; fax (321) 867-1817. 

NASA Case No. KSC-12878: Bimetallic Treatment System and Its Application for Removal and Remediation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs); NASA Case No. KSC-12899: Emission Control System; NASA Case No. KSC-12798: Data Acquisition System. 

Dated: February 9, 2007. 

Keith T. Sefton, 

Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management.

[FR Doc. E7-2913 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
No. 49098.

#### Protest 82955-K of Gambarelli & Davitto (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It appeared that the plaintiff claimed the refund of duty solely by reason of the provisions of section 563 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938. In view of these provisions it was held that this court is without jurisdiction to direct the collector to make an abatement in duties because of any injury, deterioration, loss, or damage *236sustained by merchandise while remaining in customs custody. ' On the authority of Abstract 27365- the court' dismissed the protest.
&XVKLQJ 2. :7, 6SRW 3ULFH )2% 'ROODUV SHU %DUUHO

KWWSZZZHLDJRYGQDYSHWKLVW/HDI+DQGOHUDVK["Q SHW	V UZWF	I D 

3(752/(80 	 27+(5 /,48,'6

29(59,(: '$ $1$/<6,6 	 352-(&7,216 */266$5< 3⁄4 )$46 3⁄4 7$

5HIHUULQJ 3DJHV

6SRW 3ULFHV IRU &UXGH 2LO DQG 3HWUROHXP 3URGXFWV

9LHZ +LVWRU\ 'DLO\ :HHNO\ 0RQWKO\ $QQXDO 'RZQORDG 'DWD ;/6 )LOH

7KLV VHULHV LV DYDLODEOH WKURXJK WKH (,$ RSHQ GDWD $3, DQG FDQ EH GRZQORDGHG WR ([FHO RU HPEHGGHG DV DQ LQWHUDFWLYH FKDUW RU PDS RQ \RXU ZHEVLWH

&XVKLQJ 2. :7, 6SRW 3ULFH )2% 'ROODUV SHU %DUUHO

'HFDGH <HDU <HDU <HDU <HDU <HDU <HDU <HDU <HDU <HDU <HDU


V    


V          


V          


V      

 1R 'DWD 5HSRUWHG  1RW $SSOLFDEOH 1$ 1RW $YDLODEOH : :LWKKHOG WR DYRLG GLVFORVXUH RI LQGLYLGXDO FRPSDQ\ GDWD

5HOHDVH 'DWH 

1H[W 5HOHDVH 'DWH 

5HIHUULQJ 3DJHV

6SRW 3ULFHV IRU &UXGH 2LO DQG 3HWUROHXP 3URGXFWV

'2:1/2$'

'ROODUV SHU %DUUHO

&XVKLQJ 2. :7, 6SRW 3ULFH )2%

&XVKLQJ 2. :7, 6SRW 3ULFH )2%

              













'DWD 6RXUFH 7KRPVRQ 5HXWHUV
Abatement Order filed September 3, 2020 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-20-00474-CV

____________

CHERYL SUE ZARSKY, APPELLANT

V.

CAROLYN ANN WHITE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF 

THE ESTATE OF ORA WHITE, DECEASED, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 2

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 456601-401

ABATEMENT ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment signed on April 2, 2020. The notice of 

appeal was timely filed on July 1, 2020. On August 26, 2020, counsel for 

appellant, Cheryl Sue Zarsky, filed a suggestion of death informing this court that 

Zarsky died on August 4, 2020. Counsel believes that his client died testate naming 

her daughter, Cherie Zarsky, as independent executrix. Counsel intends to seek the 

authority to represent the estate of Cheryl Sue Zarsky in this appeal. 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 7.1(a)(1) provides,

If a party to a civil case dies after the trial court renders judgment but 

before the case has been finally disposed of on appeal, the appeal may 
be perfected, and the appellate court will proceed to adjudicate the 

appeal as if all parties were alive. The appellate court’s judgment will 

have the same force and effect as if rendered when all parties were 

living. The decedent party’s name may be used on all papers. 

Tex. R. App. P. 7.1(a)(1).

Accordingly, we abate this appeal for 60 days to allow counsel time to 

obtain authority from the estate of Cheryl Sue Zarsky to pursue this appeal. This 

court will require assurance from the representative of the estate of Cheryl Sue 

Zarsky that it is represented by counsel within 60 days of this order, or the appeal 

will be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Casillas v. Cano, 79 S.W.3d 587, 

592 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi-Edinburgh 2002, no pet.); Murphy v. Murphy, 21 

S.W.3d 797, 798 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2000, published order).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Spain, Hassan, and Poissant.
Before the Second Division,

October 30, 1957

No. 61305.

protests 283713-K, etc. (New York).

#### D. J. Ambrosio and Eugene Hess et al. *v.*United States,

*474Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

CARNELL FRAZIER, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 111 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 19th day of July, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID D. RITTER,

Petitioner

v.

LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF

ELECTIONS

PETITION OF: ZAC COHEN :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 9 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 27th day of January, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

and the Application to File a Reply Brief in Support of Petition are DENIED

.
STATE OF WASH INGTON 

DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY 

PO /lox 47600 • Olympia, WA 985 0<1-7600 • 360-407-6000 

711 for Washi11glu11 Uclay Service • Perso11s IVilh a speech disability call call 1177-11.13-634 1 

April1, 2014 

Mr. Dennis M. McLerran, Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue 

Seattle, W A 9810 1 

RE: SIP Revision - Infrastructure Certification for the 2008 Lead Standard 

Dear Mr. McLerran: 

The Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) prepared an infrastructure State 

lmplementaion Plan (SIP) certification that demonstrates how Washington will maintain the 

2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for lead. As the Governor's designee for 

Washington's SIP, I am submitting this certification as a revision to the SIP. Ecology adopted 

the plan effective April1, 2014. 

When EPA establishes or revises a standard, the Clean Air Act requires that the state review our 

rules and programs to ensure we have the authority and means to maintain the new standard. 

This certification shows that the provisions currently in Washington's SIP are adequate to 

maintain the 2008 lead standard. 

Ecology met all state and federal procedural requirements. Notice for public comment and a 

hearing was posted as required. The public comment period was open from February 14, 2014, 

to March 24, 2014. No hearing was requested, therefore no hearing was held. 

I am enclosing one electronic, and one paper copy of the SIP submittal package. The elech·onic 

copy (on enclosed CD) contains an exact duplicate of the hard copy. Attachment A of this letter 

includes a list of these additional materials. 

If you have any questions on this submittal, please contact Laurie Hulse-Moyer at (360) 407-

6873 or laurie.hulsemoyer@ecy.wa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Maia D. Bellon 

Director 

® 
Mr. Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator 

April 1, 2014 

Page2 

Enclosures 

cc: Jeff Hunt, EPA (w/ CD) 

Laurie Hulse-Moyer, SIP Planner (w/o enclosures) 

Nancy Pritchett, Rules and Planning Unit Manager (w/o enclosures) 

Julie Oliver, Section Manager, Program Development (w/o enclosures) 

Jeff Johnston, Section Manager, Science and Engineering (w/o enclosures) 

Stu Clark, Program Manager, Air Quality Program (w/o enclosures) 

Records file (w/ enclosures) 
Mr. Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator 

April 1, 20 14 

Page 3 

Attachment A -Materials on Enclosed CD 

• Infrastructure SIP Certification for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard 

(includ'ing response to comments) Ecology Publication 13-02-035 

• SIP Adoption Order
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Total Logistics, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ William T. Donovan
|William T. Donovan    
|November 10, 2004     
|                      
|/s/ John Buono        
|John Buono            
|November 10, 2004     



25
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANGELA EWING and

CLARENCE EWING

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4226

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04226-BWK Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

August 15, 1950

No. 54602.

#### Isaac B. Cohen Sons Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 134673-K (New York).

*254Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial a sample of the merchandise involved (item 12809) was received in evidence as exhibit 1. It consists of a glass container, measuring approximately 1J4 inches by *1%*inches thick, divided into two compartments, one of which contains a statuette and the other a rosary. The container is fitted with an aluminum-hinged cover which, when snapped into place, holds the figures enclosed but visible through two doorlike windows of what appears to be plastic material. It was stipulated that the statuettes are composed wholly or in chief value of iron, steel, lead, copper, brass, nickel, pewter, zinc, and aluminum, but not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or coated with gold lacquer, and that the glass containers are the usual containers of the items contained therein. A report of the United States Customs Laboratory, received in evidence as exhibit 2, indicated that the rosaries are composed of brass, with no evidence of the presence of platinum, gold, or silver, or plating -with gold lacquer. Upon the record presented the statuettes (item 12809) were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 397 as manufactures of metal and the rosaries (item 12809), being valued over $1.25 per dozen, at 30 percent under the *eo nomine*provision therefor in paragraph 1544. The glass containers were held dutiable at the same rate as their contents as the usual containers for the merchandise involved. *(W. X. Huber Co.*v. *United States,*3 Cust. Ct. 316, Ct. D. 267, followed.) In all other respects and as to all other items the protest was overruled.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 14

- 00864

- CV

Jeremil RODRIGUEZ

, Appellant

v. JP Morgan

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK

, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14

- 0255

- CV Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE ANGELINI , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of appeal are assessed against appellant.

SIGNED February 11, 2015.

_____________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 87-2 Filed 10/13/2004 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 87-2 Filed 10/13/2004 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 87-2 Filed 10/13/2004 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 87-2 Filed 10/13/2004 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 87-2 Filed 10/13/2004 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 87-2 Filed 10/13/2004 Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing
Owner), of World Monitor Trust  Series A (Series A), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series As Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 25, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series A.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                            
|Maureen D. Howley                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|May 9, 2005
# 1

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT &K01+000VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/5/17 

# 4

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT &K01+000VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/5/17 

# 49

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT &K01+000VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/5/17 

# 50

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT &K01+000VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/5/17 

# 950

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT &K01+000VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/5/17 

# 951

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT &K01+000VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/5/17
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60320

Summary Calendar

 

MARK L. SALISBURY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

PHILIP MCLAURIN, In official capacity as Deputy Warden; 

INMATE ACCOUNTS SUPERVISOR, One unknown named Inmate Accounts

Supervisor, in official capacity as Inmate Accounts Supervisor;

DON GRANT, Warden; KIM WILLIAMS, in individual capacity; J. A.

BANKS, in individual capacity; L. POLK, in individual capacity;

MRS. COOPER; DWAYNE TAYLOR; ROBERT L. JOHNSON; WALTER BOOKER,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:99-CV-242-B-D

--------------------

April 25, 2002

Before JONES, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Salisbury, Mississippi prisoner # 67386, appeals the

district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint

without prejudice for failure to exhaust prison administrative

remedies under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. He argues that he did not intend

to include as a party to his action the person who filed the motion

to dismiss for failure to exhaust and that the magistrate judge at
No. 01-60320

-2-

the Spears v. McCotter, 766 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1985), hearing had

excused Salisbury’s failure to exhaust. 

The record does not support Salisbury’s contention that

the magistrate judge excused the exhaustion requirement in

Salisbury’s case. The district court’s dismissal of Salisbury’s

complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust was not error.

See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); Wendall v. Asher, 162 F.3d 887, 889-90

(5th Cir. 1998). 

AFFIRMED.
# sec5_scnp_2021

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BAugust 2021
exv4w25






Exhibit 4.25




	 	 	 
	13 June 2008


Mr Russell Chenu

Chief Financial Officer

James Hardie Industries NV 

Atrium, 8th Floor 

Strawinskylaan 3077

1077ZX Amsterdam 

The Netherlands 


Ms Leigh Sanderson

Deputy Director General 

Department of Premier & Cabinet

Governor Macquarie Tower

1 Farrer Place

Sydney NSW 2000


Mr Bruce Potts

Director

James Hardie 117 Pty Ltd (Performing Subsidiary)

Level 3, 22 Pitt Street

Sydney NSW 2000

	 	Asbestos Injuries Compensation

Fund Limited

ACN 117 363 461


Suite 1, Level 7

233 Castlereagh Street

Sydney NSW 2000


PO Box A962

Sydney South NSW 1235


DX 11548, Sydney Downtown


Telephone: (02) 9277 6600

Facsimile: (02) 9277 6699 






Dear Russell, Leigh and Bruce,




NOTICE — Address for Service of Notices on Trustee



In accordance with clause 30(i) of the Amended and Restated Final Funding Agreement (the FFA), I
hereby give Notice that the Trustee, Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund Limited, wishes to vary
the address for service of Notices on the Trustee under the FFA.



It would be appreciated if, in future, any Notice to the Trustee could be addressed as follows:




	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund Limited
	 
	 	 
	Attention:

	 	The Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	 
	Address:

	 	Suite 1, Level 7, 233 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000
	 
	 	 
	Facsimile:

	 	+61 2 9277 6699.






Yours sincerely,

Asbestos Injuries Compensation Fund Limited




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Peter W. Baker
 	 	 
	Peter W Baker 	 	 
	Chairman
No. 49089.

#### Protest 13265-K of New Victoria Importing Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The record failed to support the allegations in the pleadings. The claims were therefore overruled.
Exhibit 15.1  LETTER RE: UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Report of Independent Public Accountants

To the Shareholders of The ServiceMaster Company

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed balance sheet of The ServiceMaster
Company and Subsidiaries (organized under the laws of the State of Delaware) as
of March 31, 2002, and the related statements of income for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2002 and 2001, and the condensed statement of cash flows
for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2002 and 2001. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the financial statements referred to above for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally
accepted in the United States, the balance sheet of The ServiceMaster Company as
of December 31, 2001, and the related statements of income, retained earnings,
and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and, in our
report dated January 24, 2002, we expressed an unqualified opinion on that
statement. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying
condensed balance sheet as of December 31, 2001, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the balance sheet from which it has been
derived.


ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Chicago, Illinois
April 23, 2002