alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-1423
CARL J. ROBERTS, Petitioner, versus CAVALIER MINING CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board. (No. 93-674-BLA) Submitted: January 28, 1997 Decided: February 12, 1997 Before HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Carl J. Roberts, Petitioner Pro Se. CAVALIER MINING CORPORATION, Wise, Virginia; Dorothy L. Page, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Roberts v. Cavalier Mining Corp. , No. 93-674-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 7, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Updated Analytical Summary 

Terri Zick to: Christopher Lambesis, Todd Ramaly 06/11/2008 07:33 AM 

From: 

To: 

History: 

Terri Zick <tzick@cticompanies.com > 

Christopher Lambesis/R5/USEPA/US@EPA, Todd Ramaly/R5/USEPA/US@EPA 

This message has been replied to. 

Hi ChrisAttached is the updated analytical data summary for the samples collected at Owosso Graphic Arts. I owe 

you the sampling description for the most recent samples and the certification statement. You should 

have them by tomorrow at the latest! 

Talk to you this afternoon! 

The information contained in this electronic message is privileged and/or confidential information intended only for the use of the 

individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible 

to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of the communication is 

neither allowed nor intended. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by return e-mail or by 

calling 800-CTI-TODAY and delete the message. Thank You!
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSEPH DAVID VINCZE,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0591 FCD KJM P

vs.

SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER FOR PAYMENT

 / OF INMATE FILING FEE

To: The Director of the California Department of Corrections, 1515 S Street, Sacramento,

California 95814:

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, is obligated to

pay the statutory filing fee in effect at the time of filing of his action, $150.00. 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff is obligated to make monthly payments in the amount of twenty percent

of the preceding month’s income credited to plaintiff’s trust account. The California Department

of Corrections is required to send to the Clerk of the Court payments from plaintiff’s account

each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00, until the statutory filing fee is paid in full. 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).

 In accordance with the above and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

Case 2:04-cv-00591-FCD-KJM Document 13 Filed 05/16/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The Director of the California Department of Corrections or a designee shall

collect monthly payments from plaintiff’s prison trust account in an amount equal to twenty

percent (20%) of the preceding month's income credited to the prisoner's trust account and shall

forward those payments to the Clerk of the Court each time the amount in the account exceeds

$10.00 in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) until a total of $150.00 has been collected and

forwarded to the Clerk of the Court. The payments shall be clearly identified by the name and

number assigned to this action. 

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of

plaintiff's in forma pauperis affidavit on Director, California Department of Corrections, 1515 S

Street, Sacramento, California 95814.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial

Department of the court.

DATED: May 13, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

1

vinc0591.cdc.a

Case 2:04-cv-00591-FCD-KJM Document 13 Filed 05/16/05 Page 2 of 2
# C_2018152EN.01005902.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/59

---

Order of the General Court of 6 March 2018 — CFA Institute v EUIPO — Bloss and Others (CERTIFIED FINANCIAL ENGINEER CFE)

(Case T-155/16) (1)

1

(2018/C 152/70)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

1

---
**General Fund of the U.S. Government’s Impacts to USSGL TFM**

**New USSGL Account (Effective FY 2017)**

**Account Title:**Cancellations of Revenue and Other Financing Sources – General Fund of the U.S. Government

**Account Number:** 591910

**Normal Balance:** Credit

**Definition:** The amount of canceled authority derived from revenue and other financing sources returned to the General Fund of the U.S. Government. This account is for the General Fund of the U.S. Government use only. 

**Justification:** This account is needed to properly eliminate with 591900 “Revenue and Other Financing Sources – Cancellations.”

****

**Attribute Table:**

****

**General Fund of U.S. Government Name Change:**

From “General Fund of the Treasury” to “General Fund of the **U.S. Government**”

Impacts the following USSGL accounts:

***Impacts to the following TCs:***

A104  To record the enactment of appropriations.

A112  To record in the losing fund the reappropriation of authority from an expired losing fund to an unexpired gaining fund

***Impacts to the following Attributes:***

***References:***

Account Title: Revenue and Other Financing Sources -Cancellations

Account Number: 591900 

Normal Balance: Debit

Definition: The amount of canceled authority returned to the General Fund of the Treasury that was originally derived from revenue or other financing sources. Examples include spending authority from offsetting collections and special or trust fund receipts that are administratively withdrawn, for example, cancellations pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1555. Do not include amounts in special or trust fund expenditure accounts that are rescinded or returned to a specific General Fund Receipt Account.

Page 1 of 8 		IRC Handout 04/20/2017
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for
the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C.S. Lau, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:February 18, 2009



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/    JOHN C. S.
LAU              
|John C.S. Lau                      
|President & Chief Executive Officer
II 

Calendar No. 203 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1532 

To disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle for life an individual 

who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony involving 

human trafficking. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2017 

Mr. THUNE (for himself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. NELSON, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

RUBIO, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, and Mr. HELLER) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

AUGUST 3, 2017 

Reported by Mr. THUNE, without amendment 

A BILL 

To disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle 

for life an individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony involving human trafficking. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Human Trafficking 

5 on Our Roads Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1532 RS

1 SEC. 2. LIFETIME DISQUALIFICATION WITHOUT REIN2 STATEMENT. 

3 Section 31310(d) of title 49, United States Code, is 

4 amended— 

5 (1) in the heading, by striking ‘‘CONTROLLED

6 SUBSTANCE VIOLATIONS’’ and inserting ‘‘LIFETIME

7 DISQUALIFICATION WITHOUT REINSTATEMENT’’; 

8 (2) by striking ‘‘The Secretary’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘(1) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE VIOLATIONS.—The 

10 Secretary’’; and 

11 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(2) HUMAN TRAFFICKING VIOLATIONS.—The 

13 Secretary shall disqualify from operating a commer14 cial motor vehicle for life an individual who uses a 

15 commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony in16 volving an act or practice described in paragraph (9) 

17 of section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection 

18 Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9)).’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 203 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1532 

A BILL 

To disqualify from operating a commercial motor 

ing human trafficking. cial motor vehicle in committing a felony involvvehicle for life an individual who uses a commerAUGUST 3, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Case 2:05-cv-04506-ER Document 156-2 Filed 06/30/2008 Page 1 of 1
----

Publication of the final accounts for the financial year 2005

(2006/C 230/10)

The complete version of the final accounts may be found at the following address:

http://www.eda.europa.eu/finance

----
**2-4700	APPENDIX 7	 VOL I**

**VOL I	Appendix 3	2-4700**

**Note:**For Closing Package reporting purposes, all General Fund activity (TP AID 099) must be reclassified to a Closing Package line within Reciprocal Categories 29-48.

**May 2017	16**

**DRAFT	1	IRC Handout April 23, 2019**

**2-4700	APPENDIX 7	 VOL I**

**VOL I	Appendix 3	2-4700**

**Note:**For Closing Package reporting purposes, all General Fund activity (TP AID 099) must be reclassified to a Closing Package line within Reciprocal Categories 29-48.

****May 2017********16****

Note: All General Fund activity (TP AID 099) must be reclassified to a line within Reciprocal Categories 30-48.

********3******May 2019**

### 

### 

### Category 29–Non-Reciprocating USSGL Accounts for Federal Activity 

	221300Z3	 Employer Contributions and Payroll Taxes Payable

	222500Z3	 Unfunded FECA Liability

	229000Z3	 Other Unfunded Employment Related Liability

	240000Z	 Liability for Non-Fiduciary Deposit Funds and Undeposited Collections

	241000Z	 Liability for Clearing Accounts

	299000Z	 Other Liabilities Without Related Budgetary Obligations

~~310500Z	 Unexpended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors–Years Preceding the Prior-Year~~

~~310800Z	 Unexpended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors~~

~~310900Z	 Unexpended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Changes in Accounting Principles		570500Z	 Expended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors–Years Preceding the Prior-Year~~

~~570800Z	 Expended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors~~

~~570900Z	 Expended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Changes in Accounting Principles~~

	573000Z	 Financing Sources Transferred Out Without Reimbursement

	579000Z	 Other Financing Sources

	579010Z	 Other General Fund Financing Sources

	590000Z E/T	 Other Revenue 

	590900Z E/T	 Contra Revenue for Other Revenue 

640000Z3	 Benefit Expense

	680000Z	 Future Funded Expenses

	690000Z	 Non-Production Costs	

740000Z	 Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors

740100Z	 Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Changes in Accounting Principles

	740500Z	 Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors–Years Preceding the Prior-Year
DRAFT

750000Z X/T	 Distribution of Income–Dividend

**Note:**For Closing Package reporting purposes, all General Fund activity (TP AID 099) must be reclassified to a Closing Package line within Reciprocal Categories 29-48.

**May 2017	16**

**DRAFT	2	IRC Handout April 23, 2019**
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 20, 2021

a0113 

# Order

Clerk January 20, 2021

161865

MEEMIC INSURANCE COMPANY,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 161865

COA: 346361

Wayne CC: 18

- 005480

- CK

ANGELA JONES,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 21, 2020 judgment

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to sch edule oral argument on

the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief within 42 days of the date of this order

addressing whether its declaration that a homeowners insurance policy was void ab initio

should be consider ed a denial of a claim under the policy such that it may invoke its right

to subrogation when it was required by a standard mortgage clause to pay the balance of

the appellee’s mortgage. In addition to the brief, the appellant shall electronically file an

appendix conforming to MCR 7.312(D)(2). In the brief, citations to the record must

provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall

file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant’s brief. The

appellee shall also electronically file an appendix, or in the alternative, stipulate to the use

of the appendix filed by the appellant. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within

14 days of being served with the appellee’s brief. The pa rties should not submit mere

restatements of their application papers.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of I.D. Systems,
Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jeffrey M. Jagid,
Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.




Dated: March 31, 2010
                /s/
      Jeffrey M. JagidName:
      Jeffrey M. JagidTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
August 2, 1956

Reap. Dec. 8628.

#### Baar *& Beards, Inc.*v. *United States.*

Entered at New York. Reap. Dec. 8588. Motions by plaintiff and defendant.
### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAKELAND REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM ) ) 

### Plaintiff, ) ) 

### v. ) Civil Case No. 12-600 (RJL) ) 

### KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary ) Department of Health andHuman Services ) ) 

### Defendant. ) :/?._ORDER (July

# J6, 20 13) (Dkts. ##9, 11) 

# 1-L Forthe reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion entered this 

# 'i_ day of July 20 13, it is hereby 

### ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #11] is 

### GRANTED; and it is further 

### ORDEREDthatplaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #9] is 

### DENIED; and it is further

1

### ORDEREDthat the above-captioned case is DISMISSEDwithprejudice. SO ORDERED.

United States District Judge

2
|EXHIBIT 21.
SUBSIDIARIES OF INNOVEX, INC.
|-----------------------------------------

|Name                                     |  | State or
      other jurisdiction of
      Incorporation or Organization
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Innovex
      Precision Components, Inc. |  | Minnesota                                                               
|                                         |  |                                                                         
|Innovex Southwest,
      Inc.            |  | Delaware                                                                
|                                         |  |                                                                         
|ADFlex Cayman
      Ltd.                 |  | Cayman Island                                                           
|                                         |  |                                                                         
|Innovex (Thailand)
      Ltd.            |  | Thailand                                                                
|                                         |  |                                                                         
|ADFlex Solutions
      Ltd.              |  | Delaware
      and United Kingdom                                       
|                                         |  |                                                                         
|ADFlex Mexico
      S.A. de C.V          |  | Mexico                                                                  
|                                         |  |                                                                         
|Iconovex
      Corporation               |  | Minnesota                                                               
|                                         |  |                                                                         
|Innovex Limited                          |  | Minnesota                                                               
|                                         |  |                                                                         
|Mar Engineering,
      Inc.              |  | Minnesota                                                               
|                                         |  |                                                                         
|Innovex Sales
      Limited              |  | Jamaica                                                                 

|-16-
|----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: AMERICAN INVESTORS :

LIFE INSURANCE CO. ANNUITY : MDL DOCKET NO. 1712

MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES :

LITIGATION :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2011, upon

consideration of the defendants’ Motion to Enforce Final Order

and Judgment (Docket No. 540), the plaintiff’s Cross-Motion Under 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) (Docket No. 541), the defendants’

consolidated response thereto, and for the reasons stated in a

memorandum of law bearing today’s date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

the defendants’ motion is GRANTED and the plaintiff’s motion is

DENIED. 

As set forth in the accompanying memorandum, the

plaintiff Alvany E. Wilson is ENJOINED from litigating the claims

currently brought against Aviva Life and Annuity Company in the

action styled Wilson v. Albertson, et al., No. 11-7478, pending

in Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Florida.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

Case 2:05-md-01712-MAM Document 544 Filed 12/06/11 Page 1 of 1
Case No. 13,737.

#### TALLAHASSEE v. NEWBY.

[This case was decided by the court of appeals of Florida, and is reported in 3 N. Y. Leg. Obs. 110.]
Before the First Division,

April 18, 1947

No. 51660.

#### Protests 45087-K, etc., of J. A. Deknatel & Son, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020). In accordance therewith the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained.
No. 56984.

#### Pennsylvania Textile Corp. v. United States,

protest 183737-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.