alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Raymond A. Low, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 9, 2009 | By:    | /s/ RAYMOND A. LOW                                                                                           |
|--------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Raymond A. Low

*Chief Financial Officer*

*(Principal Financial Officer and**Principal Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT 

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

32E

Is First Year and Year of Budget Authority Indicator Validation

If Is First Year is Y, then Year of BA must be NEW. If Is First Year is N, then Year of BA must be BAL for annual & multiyear TAS when using PYA of X, and can be NEW or BAL for X year TAS and for annual & multiyear TAS when using PYA B or P.

YEAR OF BUDGET 

AUTHORITY CODE IS FIRST YEAR

CONCATENATED 

TAS

Pass BAL Y

03620202020 

0140000

Pass BAL Y 086 X0480000

70E

Limited Use of USSGL 415100 with Authority Type Code "P"

The use of USSGL 415100 with Authority Type Code "P" is limited to specific Treasury Account Symbols.

BEA CATEGORY 

INDICATOR

CONCATENATED 

TAS

Pass M 012 X5203000Pass M

02020152016 

5445000

Pass M

02020162017 

5445000

Pass M

02020172018 

5445000

Pass M

02020182019 

5445000

74E

Limited Use of USSGL 439100 with PYA "X" on Expired TAS

The use of USSGL 439100 with PYA "X" on an expired TAS is limited to specific TAS.

CONCATENATED 

TAS

Pass

07520192019 1545000

90E

Disaster Emergency Fund Code Domain Value Restrictions

The use of DEF Code domain values other than "Q" is limited to specific fund families.

DISASTER 

EMERGENCY FUND 

CODE Fund Family

Pass J 0141125Pass L 0750343Pass N 0171810Pass N 0190209Pass N 0700540Pass N 0970361Pass N 0970390Pass N 0970819

99E USSGL Reimbursable Flag "R" Restriction

The use of some USSGL accounts with Reimbursable Flag "R" is limited to specific TAS.

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

CONCATENATED 

TAS

Pass 419000 097 X4930000Pass 419000 097 X4930002Pass 419000 097 X4930003Pass 419000 097 X4930005Pass 438200 455 X4110000

112 Main Account 3611 USSGL Restrictions

TAS with Main Account 3611 are only permitted to report specific USSGL accounts. Pass

MAIN ACCOUNT 

CODE

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

<>3611 =131900<>3611 <>131900<>3611 =590900

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Bulletin No. 2021-07 DRAFT VII VDR - 1 
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT 

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

<>3611 <>590900=3611 =131900=3611 =590900

113 Main Account 3612 USSGL Restrictions

TAS with Main Account 3612 are only permitted to report specific USSGL accounts. Pass

MAIN ACCOUNT 

CODE

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

<>3612 =131900<>3612 <>131900<>3612 =590900<>3612 <>590900=3612 =131900=3612 =590900

Bulletin No. 2021-07 DRAFT VII VDR - 2
#### David Henry MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim HUNT, Governor; Mike Easley; North Carolina State Bar; Franklin Freeman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 01-6218.

UMted States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 12, 2001.

Decided April 19, 2001.

David Henry Miller, pro se.

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

David Henry Miller appeals the district court’s order denymg relief on Ms 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opiMon and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal as frivolous on the reasoning of the district court. *Miller v. Hunt,*No. CA-00-810-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented m the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I,
Steven  J. Cohen, President of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1)           The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.




Dated:  September
      15, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Steven
      J. CohenSteven
      J. CohenPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

- 

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff, 

- against - 

DAVID FORREST and T. BEAUCLERC 

ROGERS IV,, 

Defendants. 

x

:

:

:

:

:

:

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

- 

x

STATE OF NEW YORK ) 

 : ss.: 

COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) 

MAURA A. McLOUGHLIN, being duly sworn, deposes and 

says: 

1. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to 

this action. 

2. On the 6th day of January, 2003 I served the annexed DISCLOSURE STATEMENT OF PLAINTIFF upon: 

Nicholas M. Centrella, Esq. 

Conrad O'Brien Gellman & Rohn, PC 

1515 Market Street 

16th Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19102 

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 24 Filed 01/06/2003 Page 1 of 2
-2- 

DRAFT: 1/6/03 C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\B5NX01!.DOC

Edward M.Dunham, Jr.,Esq. 

Duane Morris, LLP 

One Liberty Place 

Suite 4200 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

by depositing true and correct copies thereof in the letter 

drop maintained by the United States Postal Service located at 

80 Pine Street, New York, New York 10005 enclosed in stamped, 

sealed envelopes addressed to the above-mentioned attorneys. 

/s/ Maura A. McLoughlin_____ MAURA A. McLOUGHLIN 

Sworn to before me this 

6th day of January, 2003 

/s/ Lynn Feldman______________ Notary Public 

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 24 Filed 01/06/2003 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 21 SUBSIDIARIES OF INCO LIMITED Inco Limited (the Registrant) has no parent. The Registrants subsidiaries as of December
31, 2004 (excluding those subsidiaries
which considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary
would not constitute a significant subsidiary as defined under Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X of the
Securities and Exchange Commission), the jurisdiction in which each such subsidiary was organized,
and the percentage of voting securities owned by the immediate parent of such subsidiary are shown
in the following chart: Inco Limited (the Registrant)International Nickel, Inc. (Delaware)
    
    
    100
    %I.E.L. Holdings (England)
    
    
    100
    %Inco Europe Limited (England)
    
    
    100
    %Goro Nickel S.A. (France) (1)
    
    
    85
    %Monticello Capital (Barbados) Limited (Barbados)
    
    
    100
    %Inco Asia Limited (Barbados)
    
    
    100
    %P.T. International Nickel Indonesia Tbk (Indonesia)
    
    
    61
    %Inco TNC Limited (Japan)
    
    
    67
    %Voiseys Bay Nickel Company Limited (Newfoundland and Labrador)
    
    
    100
    %
   (1)
    
    The Registrants interest in Goro Nickel S.A. has increased to approximately 90 per cent
following the capitalization of certain shareholder advances in February 2005. None of the subsidiaries listed above generally conducts business under a name other than
the particular name so listed. All of the above named subsidiaries are included in the consolidated financial statements of
the Registrant for the year ended December 31, 2004.
<PAGE>

                          AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This Amendment is made and entered into as of the 12th day of January, 1998
by and between INTEK DIVERSIFIED CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (together
with its successors and assigns the "Company"), and ROBERT J. SHIVER (the
"Executive").

                                 W I T N E S S E T H:

     WHEREAS, on September 8, 1997 the Company and the Executive entered into a
certain Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") whereby the Company agreed to
employ the Executive, subject to the terms and provisions said Agreement; and

     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement to
more accurately define certain terms and conditions relating to the Executive's
participation in the Company's applicable long-term incentive compensation plan;

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants
contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of
which is mutually acknowledged, the Company and the Executive agree as follows:

     1.   Paragraph 7(b)(ii) is hereby deleted in its entirety and is amended to
read as follows:

          (ii)  In the event the Fair Market Value of the 300,000 shares of
                Common Stock granted to Executive pursuant to Section 7(b)(i),
                above, is less than $1 million on December 31, 1998, Company
                further agrees to pay to Executive a sum equal to the
                difference between $1 million and the (lesser) Fair Market
                Value on December 31, 1998 of the 300,000 shares of Common
                Stock.  The sum which shall become due and payable to Executive
                on or before February 28, 1999, but not before January 1, 1999
                shall, at Executive's option, be payable either in cash or in
                Common Stock (based upon its Fair Market Value at the time of
                payment), or in a combination of cash and Common Stock.  If
                applicable, Executive shall notify Company, in writing, on or
                before January 7, 1999 as to whether he elects to be paid in
                cash, Common Stock, or a combination of cash and Common Stock.

     2.   All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect except as otherwise modified by this Amendment.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment as of the
date first written above.

                                   INTEK Diversified Corporation

                                   By:  /s/ Steven L. Wasserman, Secretary
                                       --------------------------------------


                                        /s/ Robert J. Shiver
                                   ------------------------------------------
                                   Robert J. Shiver
# sec4_attribtable

Draft	&"Arial,Bold"&9IV AT - &P	 February 15, 2024 IRC Handout
#### Edward J. GRABOWSKI, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent.

Appeal No. 84-1042.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 21, 1984.

*404Alan Hilliard Legum, Annapolis, Md., for petitioner.

Richard W. Oehler, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

ORDER

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion for Reconsideration filed 18 June 1984, our ORDER of May 11, 1984, dismissing this appeal and the Mandate issued June 4, 1984, pursuant thereto are hereby VACATED. This appeal is restored to the calendar and further proceedings are STAYED therein pending final disposition by the Supreme Court on review of *Lindahl v. Office of Personnel Management,*718 F.2d 391 (Fed.Cir.1983), with respect to which certiorari was granted 18 June 1984, Supreme Court docket No. 83-5954.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Independence Lead Mines Company (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bernard C. Lannen, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Bernard C. Lannen President  Dated: December 13, 2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 : 

LEE ARTERS t/a GREENDALE BUILDERS : CIVIL ACTION - LAW 

 : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : 

 v. : 

: No. 02-CV-4388 

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. t/a, : 

ZURICH NORTH AMERICA as successor in : 

Interest to ASSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA, et al. : 

 : 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

 : 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that on this day a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Amended Notice of Appeal was served by first class mail, postage prepaid, addressed as 

follows upon the following: 

Honorable John P. Fullam 

Room 15614 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 

United States Courthouse 

601 Market Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19106 

Carl Delacato, Jr., Esquire 

Hecker, Brown, Sherry & Johnson, LLP 

1700 Two Logan Square 

18th and Arch Streets 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Frank Marcone, Esquire 

127 Chester Pike 

Ridley Park, PA 19078 

Case 2:02-cv-04388-JF Document 34-2 Filed 02/02/2004 Page 1 of 2
 VAUGHAN, DUFFY & CONNORS, LLP 

 

 By: ________________________________ 

 Francis X. Nolan, Esquire 

 Attorney I.D. No. 09237 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 102 Pickering Way, Suite 400 

 Exton, PA 19341 

 (610) 524-2100 

Date: January 29, 2004 

Case 2:02-cv-04388-JF Document 34-2 Filed 02/02/2004 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 1 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 2 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 3 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 4 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 5 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 6 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 7 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 8 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 9 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 10 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 11 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 12 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 13 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 14 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 15 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 16 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 17 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 18 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 19 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 20 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 21 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 22 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 23 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 24 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 25 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 26 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 27 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 28 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 29 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 30 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 31 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 32 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 33 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 34 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 35 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 36 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 37 of 38
Case 2:02-cv-04410-CRW Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 38 of 38
Exhibit 24.2
**POWER OF ATTORNEY**
     Bruce R. Worthington,the undersigned, Director of PG&E National EnergyGroup, Inc., hereby constitutes and appoints Thomas B. King as hisattorney-in-fact with full power of substitution to sign and file with theSecurities and Exchange Commission in his capacity as Director of said corporation the Form10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2002, required by Section 13or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any and all amendments andother filings or documents related thereto, and hereby ratifies all that saidattorney-in-fact does or causes to be done by virtue hereof.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ihave executed this document this 4th day of March,2003.                         /s/ Bruce R. Worthington
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1387 

To require the Secretary of Defense to implement processes and procedures 

to provide expedited evaluation and treatment for prenatal surgery under 

the TRICARE program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2017 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. CASEY, and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to implement processes 

and procedures to provide expedited evaluation and treatment for prenatal surgery under the TRICARE program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TRICARE Expedited 

5 Evaluation and Treatment for Prenatal Surgery Act of 

6 2017’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1387 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPEDITED EVALUATION AND TREATMENT FOR 

2 PRENATAL SURGERY UNDER THE TRICARE 

3 PROGRAM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

5 implement processes and procedures to ensure that a cov6 ered beneficiary under the TRICARE program whose 

7 pregnancy is complicated with a fetal anomaly or sus8 pected of being complicated with a fetal anomaly receives, 

9 in an expedited manner and at the discretion of the cov10 ered beneficiary, evaluation and treatment from a 

11 perinatal or pediatric specialist capable of providing sur12 gical management and intervention in utero. 

13 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the terms ‘‘cov14 ered beneficiary’’ and ‘‘TRICARE program’’ have the 

15 meanings given those terms in section 1072 of title 10, 

16 United States Code. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WAYNE CHILDS : CIVIL ACTION

 :

v. :

 :

SECRETARY OF THE NAVY : NO. 05-cv-04050-JF

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Fullam, Sr. J. March 14, 2006

Plaintiff worked for a brief period as an employee of

the Department of the Navy. In 1988, during his probationary

period, he was fired – allegedly, for sleeping on the job, and

for being AWOL. Mr. Childs contended that he was the victim of

racial and/or disability discrimination. These charges were

thoroughly investigated by the Navy, and by EEOC, and were found

to lack merit. In November 1998, plaintiff brought suit in this

court against the Secretary of the Navy (C.A. No. 98-5379). On

April 22, 1999, this court granted the defendant’s motion to

dismiss, and dismissed the complaint. On July 10, 2000, the

Third Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that decision. Plaintiff

sought reconsideration by the Court en banc, but his application

was rejected. He then made repeated, unsuccessful, attempts to

have the United States Supreme Court issue a writ of certiorari

to review the Third Circuit’s action.

On July 29, 2005, plaintiff brought the present lawsuit

which, to the extent it is comprehensible, is merely a repetition

of the earlier lawsuit. Indeed, plaintiff has obligingly

Case 2:05-cv-04050-JF Document 20 Filed 03/14/06 Page 1 of 3
2

included, among his voluminous pro se filings, much of the file

in the earlier case.

The defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, and it is

clear that this motion must be granted. All of the plaintiff’s

claims are barred by the res judicata effect of the earlier

judgment, and are plainly lacking in merit.

An Order follows.

Case 2:05-cv-04050-JF Document 20 Filed 03/14/06 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WAYNE CHILDS : CIVIL ACTION

 :

v. :

 :

SECRETARY OF THE NAVY : NO. 05-cv-04050-JF

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14 day of March 2006, IT IS ORDERED: th

1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and this

action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

2. This court’s order dated August 2, 2005, granting

plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis, is VACATED.

3. Any and all pending motions filed by plaintiff are

DENIED as moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John P. Fullam 

John P. Fullam, Sr. J.

Case 2:05-cv-04050-JF Document 20 Filed 03/14/06 Page 3 of 3