alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSEPH MARINO, :

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

SLS, INC., et al., : No. 03-3058

Defendants. :

 ORDER

AND NOW, this day of July, 2003, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Civil Action Nos. 03-3058 and 02-4488 are hereby CONSOLIDATED

for all purposes including discovery and trial. All pleadings, motions,

discovery and other matters in all cases shall be filed at Civil Action No.

02-4488 as the lead case. A copy of this order shall be docketed at Civil

Action No. 02-4488. 

2. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case for statistical purposes. 

3. Counsel for Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this Order on Defendants

Joseph Levy and Maureen Levy.

BY THE COURT:

___________________

Berle M. Schiller, J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04488-BMS Document 60 Filed 07/10/2003 Page 1 of 1
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this

opinion sh o uld not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 95-10776 Summary Calendar

_______________________

MIGUEL REYNA, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division,
Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 6:95-CV-035-C

_________________________________________________________________ July 17, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Miguel Reyna appeals the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition on grounds of writ abuse. Having reviewed the record and
briefs, we AFFIRM the judgment for es sentially the same reasons adopted by the district court. Reyna v. Scott , No. 6:95-CV-045-C (N.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 1995). We add that petitioner has not alleged2

facts sufficient to bypass the cause and prejudice requirement with

a showing of “factual innocence.” S awyer v. Whitley ,

___ U.S. ___, 112 S.Ct. 2514 (1992). He alleges that he shot his former lover
twice in self-defense at close range with a 12-gauge shotgun. This issue, far from being concealed, was sent to the jury, and they rejected it. Such facts do not amount to a colorable claim of
innocence that would permit Reyna to escape the doctrine of writ

abuse. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 50415.

#### Protest 104460-K of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York)

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The record established that the paperweights are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Woolworth*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 221, C. A. D. 20). In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 339 was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

December 11, 1952

No. 56976.

#### Charles Garcia & Co., Inc., and J. M. Rodgers Co. *v.*United States,

protest 177884-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J,

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of foil blades similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Castello Fencing Equipment Co., Inc.,*and *Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 72, C. D. 1447), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
On September 12, 2013, EPA met with representatives from IKEA regarding the recently proposed

regulations implementing the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act. IKEA officials reiterated concerns that they submitted in their public comments, including concerns related to the labeling and recordkeeping requirements, the sell

- by dates, as well as the time frame for implementation of the third

- party certification program. IKEA suggested that EPA use certain Consumer Product Safety Commission labeling requirements as a model, in addition to the labeling requirements currently in place in California. IKEA alerted the Agency to new pressed wood product technologies currently being developed and suggested that the Agency develop regulations that squarely address products made with those new technologies.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 14

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 55 Att. 20

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-21 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 14 of 14
No. 60785.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 277089-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that item No. 1630 would now be properly classified at 7)4 percent under paragraph 340, as modified, *supra,*the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said item.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"December 2018
**Exhibit 23**

 

 

Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

TheBoard of Directors

FurnitureBrands International, Inc.:

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.33-65714, 333-6990, 333-39355, 333-80189, 333-100133 and 333-130322) on FormS-8 of Furniture Brands International, Inc. of our reports dated March 14,2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Furniture BrandsInternational, Inc. as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the related consolidatedstatements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income andcash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2005, the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2005, which reportsappear in the December 31, 2005annual report on Form 10-K of Furniture Brands International, Inc..
| /s/ KPMG LLP |
|--------------|

St.Louis, Missouri

March 14, 2006

 

----
**Part 2, Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits**

One of the goals the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) has envisioned for GTAS is to improve the consistency in agency trial balance reporting. This will be accomplished through validations and edits.

The validations ensure that the attributes reported in agencies’ GTAS trial balance submissions are valid for the USSGL account. The validations encompass both USSGL level attributes per the USSGL Attribute Table and Treasury Account Symbol (TAS) level attributes found in the Super Master Account (SMAF).

Simple validations are those involving one attribute while special validations involve more than one attribute. All validations are fatal.

The edits compare the agency trial balances with USSGL rules and with data from authoritative sources such as the Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS), Fiscal Service and the Federal Financing Bank. The edits may be either fatal or proposed. Fiscal Service will use the proposed edits only for analytical purposes. Fiscal Service disclaims any role or responsibility with the agency auditor relationship concerning the GTAS fatal and proposed analytical edits.

The following are the validation and edit reports included in this section:

Page 1 of 1

# image1.png
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Furniture Brands International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ralph P. Scozzafava, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  | /s/ Ralph P. ScozzafavaRalph P. Scozzafava
Title:Chief Executive OfficerFurniture Brands International, Inc.
February 29, 2008
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Brian
Chaiken, the principal financial officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.           The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;





(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based upon such evaluation; and





(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants' fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;





5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:





(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Dated:  August
      19, 2008
              By:
              /s/ 
      Brian ChaikenBrian
      ChaikenChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RICHARD ERNEST ANAYA,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0544 MCE KJM P

vs.

MULE CREEK STATE PRISON

MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

 /

By order filed December 28, 2004, plaintiff was directed to file his amended

complaint within thirty days. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an

amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed

without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District

Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty

days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written

objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s

Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the

/////

Case 2:04-cv-00544-MCE -KJM Document 38 Filed 06/06/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951

F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

DATED: June 3, 2005.

______________________________________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

anaya544.fta

Case 2:04-cv-00544-MCE -KJM Document 38 Filed 06/06/05 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

NICKEY JARMAIN TRAYLOR,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00222-CR

Appeal from

291st District Court

of Dallas County, Texas

(TC # F-1371826-U)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the judgment of the trial 

court should be modified to reflect that Appellant entered a plea of not true to the motion to 

revoke. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below as modified. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2016.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Power of Attorney by Baohong Yin, dated March 25, 2008



 Exhibit 10.14 
 LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION 
 I, Yin Baohong, the resident of People’s Republic of China (hereafter
“China”) and the ID card number 320102196710242849, am the shareholder who possesses 21% equity right (hereafter “Personal Equity”) of Beijing Dongda Zhengbao Science and Technology Co., Ltd (hereafter “S&T
Company”). I hereby, for my Personal Equity, irrevocably authorize the person appointed by Beijing Champion Distance Education Technology Co., Ltd (hereafter “Champion Company”) to exercise the following rights within the valid period
of this Letter of Authorization. 
 I authorize Champion Company or its appointed person as my exclusive agent to exercise the rights about my Personal
Equity on full behalf of myself, including without limitation: 
  

	1.	Exercise the shareholder’s right and the shareholder’s voting right that should be enjoyed by me according to the provisions of laws and Articles of Association, including
without limitation: sell, transfer, pledge, or dispose all or parts of my equity; and 

  

	2.	Designate and appoint the legal representative (chairman of the board of directors), directors, supervisors, general manager and other senior management staff of the company.


 Champion Company or its appointed person has the right, within the authorization limitation, to sign the Equity Transfer Contract provided
by the Exclusive Purchase Contract in which I am the signing party, to perform the Equity Pledge Contract and the Exclusive Purchase Contract according to schedule. The performance of such rights will not make any restriction for this Letter of
Authorization. 
 All conducts of Champion Company or its appointed person about my Personal Equity should be deemed as my personal conducts, all the
documents signed by Champion Company or its appointed person should be deemed as signed by myself without my agreement in advance. I will accept all the conducts above. 
 Champion Company or its appointed person has the right to sub-authorize the authorized matter above to other persons or entities without notice to me or getting the permission from me in advance. 
 This Letter of Authorization will be irrevocable and continuously effective during the period I am the shareholder of S&T Company as of this Letter of Authorization
executed. 
 I hereby waive the rights in relation to my Personal Equity that has been empowered to Champion Company or its appointed person according to
this Letter of Authorization within the valid period of the Letter of Authorization, and will not exercise such rights by myself. 
  

 1 








  

			
	Signature:	 	Yin Baohong
	Date:	 	March 25th, 2008
		
	Witness:	 	Yu Ning
	Date:	 	March 25th, 2008

  

 2
18.05
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00393-CV

NASSER REZAEE APPELLANT

V.

DAVID LITTMAN, A.T.L., INC., 

JULIE LOWRY, RENEE STACK, 

AND THOMAS STACK

APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant’s “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.” It is the 

court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. 

DELIVERED: December 15, 2011
(Reap. Dec. 10703)

#### Authentic Furniture Products *v.*United States

Entry No. 14203, etc.

(Decided April 1, 1964)

*Stem*<fi *Shostalc*for the plaintiff.

*John*TV. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached 'Schedule of Cases, manufactured by Otsubo Kogyo, Hida Sangyo, or by Kashiwa Mokko Ltd., consists of chairs and other wood furniture, and that, at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from *484which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values, net packed.

> 2. That all the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement was entered subsequent to February 27,1958.

> 3. That the merchandise the subject of this stipulation is not included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in See. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 4. That the merchandise and issues involved herein are the same in all material respects as those in *Authentic Furniture Products*v. *United States,*Reappt. No. R61/23233, etc., Oust. Ct. 438, Reap. Dec. 10614, Advance Treasury Decisions, Yol. 98, No. 45, page 113, and that the record in said case may be incorporated with the record herein.

> 5. That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here in question and that such value was the appraised unit value, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- FM QSMO
- Marketplace Catalog 
- Commercial Vendor Offerings

# Commercial Vendor Offerings

Federal agency customers can acquire FM solutions and services from commercial vendors through the General Services Administration (GSA) Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) government-wide contract vehicle using the FM QSMO Special Item Number (SIN) 518210FM. SIN 518210FM is comprised of four (4) subgroups, described as follows:

## Core Financial Management Solutions (Core FS)

Partially pre-configured commercial financial management software suites offered in a cloud environment.

## Additional Financial Management (FM) Solutions

Business capabilities that augment core financial systems. (Includes, but not limited to, cost management solutions, reporting tools, business information exchange (BIE) solutions, FM business analytics and intelligence)

## Financial Management (FM) Solution/Service Adoption and Transition Services

Services to help agencies in identifying, selecting, acquiring, migrating to, and using FM QSMO Marketplace offerings effectively and efficiently. These services may also be needed when extensive or complex FM solution/service changes are released, or significant functionality is removed. (Includes, but not limited to, strategy and planning, FM data conversion and migration, IV&V, readiness assessments, integration support, project management, and FM solution/service testing)

## Financial Management (FM) Technology Operations Support Services

Support and assist with technology implementation and operations. (Includes, but not limited to, FM technology development, testing, implementation, operations and maintenance (O&M) support, information exchanges between FM solutions and services and agency mission systems, service desk, related ancillary training, and support for legacy core financial systems (on premise or cloud), including infrastructure services and software license maintenance)

----

The FM QSMO partners with GSA to evaluate vendor applications to the SIN and ensure that offerings are compliant with applicable federal standards and other capabilities as defined in the Financial Management Capability Framework (FMCF). By pre-vetting commercial vendor solutions and services for baseline needs, agencies benefit from procurement efficiencies and can focus on their specific requirements.

Ready to proceed with an acquisition? Review the *SIN 518210FM Agency Acquisition Guide* available on the FM QSMO Resources web page for information on how agencies can conduct acquisitions using the FM QSMO Marketplace and submit requests through the FM QSMO Task Order Review Board (TORB) process.

# Available Commercial Vendors

----

Use this A-Z index to search for a specific vendor or select “RESET” to see all providers. Page numbers are at the bottom of the list.

----

Additional commercial vendors coming soon.