alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**.ED sY;()i~ 

mi UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

3 %W,4 w REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Fr ncisco CA 941 05 

~AY 0 5 2206 

Mr. Lewis Wallenmeyer, Director 

Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management 

500 S Grand Central Parkway, lSt Floor 

P.O. Box 555210 

Las Vegas, Nevada 891 55-5210 

Dear Mr. Wallenmeyer: 

Thank you for your timely submission of the Annual Network Plan Report, June 

2007. We recognize that producing this document and the associated public inspection 

process represented new requirements and we appreciate your effort to meet them. 

We have reviewed the submitted document and have found that for the most part 

it meets the minimum requirements set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. Specifically, we 

found that the plan was complete, informative, very detailed and met nearly all of the 

requirements for annual network plans as required by our regulations. However, the plan 

contains some language which EPA Region 9 cannot approve. In the Section entitled 

"Particulate Matter of 2.5 microns or Less" on page 16, the plan includes the following 

paragraph: 

"Since there are no PM2.5 samplers in the DAQEM monitoring network that 

violate the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), there is no public 

review process in place with respect to sampler location, community monitoring 

zone, or the PM2.5 monitoring network. DAQEM officially requests EPA Region 

9 to authorize the elimination of a PM2.5 monitoring network public comment 

process until a violating sampler is discovered." 

EPA regulations at 40 CFR 58.10(c) state that "The annual monitoring network 

plan must document how States and local agencies provide for the review of changes to a 

PM2.5 monitoring network that impact the location of a violating PM2.5 monitor or the 

creationlchange to a community monitoring zone, including a description of the proposed 

use of spatial averaging for purposes of making comparisons to the annual PM2 5 NAAQS 

as set forth in appendix N to part 50 of this chapter. The affected State or local agency 

must document the process for obtaining public comment and include any comments 

received through the public notification process within their submitted plan." 

While Clark County is currently in attainment of the PM2.5 NAAQS and, based . . on data trends, will most likely remain in attainment of this NAAQS for the foreseeable 
future, EPA Region 9 does not have the authority to issue an exemption for this 

regulatory requirement. This part of the regulation requires DAQEM to engage the 

public in the event that a violating PM2.5 monitor is relocated. Other agencies in Region 

9 have met this requirement by simply committing to provide notice to the public in the 

event that a violating PM2.5 monitor needs to be discontinued or relocated and 

responding to any comments received. 

If you have any questions regarding this letter, please feel free to contact me at 

(4 15) 972-326 1. 

Sincerely, 

Air Quality Analysis Office 

Air Division 

cc: Tina M. Gingras, CCDAQEM 

Michael Sword, CCDAQEM 

Yousaf Hammeed, CCDAQEM
March 8, 1948

No. 52211.

Suit 4582.

#### United States *v.*International Paint Co., Inc.

C. D. 1052 affirmed January 6, 1948. C. A. D. 376.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2024 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"&K000000Bulletin No. 2023-02	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&K000000IRC Handout 11/30/22
Before the Third Division,

September 29, 1948

No. 52558.

protests 14891-K, etc. (New York).

#### James E. Markham, Alien Property Custodian *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
for the period ended June 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                              By:  /s/ Marlene Debel
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: August 6, 2008
---------------------

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
##### 



WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
Quarter ended September 30, 2006
 CERTIFICATIONS
 I, Edward J. McKeon, President and Chief Executive Officer of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.
(the small business issuer), certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Edward J. McKeonEdward J. McKeon, President and CEO
No. 51338.

#### Protests 57360-K, etc., of Ratsey & Lapthorn, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 57657.

#### Fred Gretsch Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 210214-K (New York).

*313Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pieces of vellum the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57385, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1736 was sustained.
Exhibit 23
                                                                               
                                                                               
                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
                                       
                                       
      As   independent  public  accountants,  we  hereby  consent  to  the
   incorporation  by  reference  of our report  dated  January  13,  1998,
   included  in this Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997,  into
   Illinois   Bell  Telephone  Company's  previously  filed   Registration
   Statement File No. 33-50007.
   
   
   
   
   ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
   
   
   Chicago, Illinois
   March 12, 1998
EXHIBIT 32.2

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Circle Group Holdings, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Dana L.
Dabney, Chief Financial Officer of the Circle Group Holdings, Inc. certify,
pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  May 13, 2005                               /s/ Dana L. Dabney
                                                   ------------------
                                                   Dana L. Dabney
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
2 Attachments 

Hi all,

Consistent with our EO, attached are the handouts from the 12866 meeting this morning.

Regards,

Cortney

 

When: Thursday, March 17, 2011 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: 9104 NEOB 

 

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments. 

 

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* 

 

Robert Nolan, ExxonMobil has requested this meeting. 

 

Call-in number: 202-395-6392; code 9325179

FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on NESHAP: Marine Tank Vessel Leading Operations, Printing 

and Publishing; Production and Group I Polymers and Resins 

Higgins, Cortney 

to: 

Ann Johnson, Ken Hustvedt, Nick Parsons 

03/17/2011 02:52 PM 

Show Details 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Mar17_2011_RTR_Group1_Handout1.pdf Mar17_2011_RTR_Group1_Handout2.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Settings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web3340.... 3/31/2011
# sec5_sbr_2022

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2022-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2022
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

lioaorabla C. 2. Pettersan 

County AttQm%y 

Brawater CQUBty 

, Plplne , Texas 

da aa follovs I 

DP1ea6e advise if n hm the right 

anythiag other 

As. en example, 

ch a person oad 

aaceF teln 1 tretiQQ card.” 

Commlsalon, end its deputo as “gag! vardelu” me 

exa8 aad a8 much the lau 

duty to %nforce the rtatotectloa and prerervatlota of 

.” nrticle 906, veraon’a Ancases of vi?latlons of the ane 

as the sheriff. PrtlcleS 4 % 3 end 905, V.A.P.C. Also, they 

18~s vlth tha seem authorltg 

“mg arest without a varrent cay poreon found by theta ia the 

act af violatiag any of the levs for the grotootlm end popeEation of ~UII~, wild birds or Slsh. . . . rftlcle 905, 

V.F.P.C. zurthermoy3, a 

or other raaegtacle 

pa werdeo nay search a *game bag 

aed amy b-y, uagon, automobile, or 

other vehlclc vithout a. warrant v&tell he ‘hae rcasm to 8unpcct m thet lt “may coatetn &em unlawfully killed ar taken, * 
aonorable C. 3. Bitterson, page 2 

Articleb d97 and 9234, V.A.P.C. Furthermore, 6 game varden 

la espouered to “enter upon my leads or veter where vlld 

game OT fish era knovu to reuge or strex fop the purpose of 

enforcing the game sad fish laws of this State. . . .* 

We are not reeking to enumerate all enforcement 

povera of the Geme, Fish Q Oystar CoPsnlseloa UQ~ its deputlee 

but It 18 sufficient to eey that they me numerou8 cud a8 a 

8SWWk1 prQpOSitiOl%, UC thiQk the 0ffiCie.l SCtS Of eUCh Officers rust aoncern or be directed toverd the enforcement of 

the gme end f lsh leve. Us fell to find aar authority for 

eecnch by gem verden unlesn it is la mcme vay portiasot to 

the lewe he its charged with enforcing. Thus, we do not see 

vhet right 8 ~SJES warden would have to seerch a pereon solely for the purpose of aecerteletrrg if he poraeseed a draft, 

card where no gene law violetlon op suspected violation uas 

1 nvolved . Bovever, ve do uot vfrh to be underetodd es holding that the search of a person and the eraminathx of h~.s 

pareor. affectr by a game warden vould in no event be verranteil by Iev. Xt is a Veu reaogaLted prlnolple of law in Texer 

that where a pemaon has beeo legeilp arrested, a ranch of his 

person ecd psreonel effect8 without a warrem ia permitted 8s 

an 1acLdeat of the arrest. 3ae 4 Texas Jurisprudence 7901 

51 A.L.B. 424; Havlep v. State, 2% S.U. 556; Rutherford v. 

State, 121 9.W. (ad) 342,ar MerrLck v. Atate, 167 S.Y. (26) 743. 

It is QUQ elncere hope that this op%nion vlll prove 

tQ be Of #ORW SSS%S64%UCS tQ gOU. 

Yerp truly yours 

BY 

EP :db
# C_2019328EN.01005201.xml

| 30.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/52

---

Order of the General Court of 8 July 2019 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Amedei (For you)

(Case T-480/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark For you - Decision to reject the application for registration based on absolute grounds for refusal - No longer any locus standi - No need to adjudicate)

(2019/C 328/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: A. Berger and M. Wolter, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Amedei Srl (Pontedera, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2016 (Case R 851/2015-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Amedei and Lidl Stiftung.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Ingles Markets, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 25, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronald B. Freeman, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|/s/    RONALD B.
FREEMAN                 
|Ronald B. Freeman Chief Financial Officer
|                                         
|November 30, 2010                        



The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit of the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
Exhibit 32.2


                      Park City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                            Certification Pursuant To
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
form 10-KSB/A for the year ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Dunlavy, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: October 14, 2005


/s/ William Dunlavy
--------------------------
Chief Financial Officer


                  (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GRACE LAWRENCE : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

TRANS UNION, LLC : NO. 02-4440

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of January, 2004, it is Ordered

that a CIVIL JURY TRIAL in the above captioned case will commence

on Monday, February 23, 2004 at 9:30 a.m., in courtroom 7-B on

the 7th floor of the U.S. District Court, 601 Market St.,

Philadelphia, PA. A Final Pretrial Conference will be held on

Wednesday, February 18, 2004 at 4:00 p.m. in chambers, room 7613

on the 7th floor.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies FAXED on _________ to: Copies MAILED on ____________ to:

James A. Francis, Esq. (via fax: 215-940-8000)

John Soumilas, Esq. (via fax: 215-940-8000)

Mark D. Mailman, Esq. (via fax: 215-940-8000)

Bruce S. Luckman, Esq. (via fax: 215-575-7688)

Timothy P. Creech, Esq. (via fax: 215-575-7688)

Jams P. Cousounis, Esq. (via fax: 215-683-5071)

Michael F. Eichert, Esq. (via fax: 215-683-5071)

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 44 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 1 of 1
W ith the exception of a date that is cited incorrectly and has no bearing on the outcome

1

(petitioner’s untimely claim regarding the jury instruction concerning possession of a firearm was filed on

September 6, 2005, rather than September 9, 2005), the magistrate judge’s recitation of the factual and

procedural history is accurate. His legal analysis is thorough and correct. Therefore, there is nothing to

add to his well reasoned and exhaustive report. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDWARD GRAZIANO : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 05-2300

:

JAMES L. GRACE, et al :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of February, 2009, upon consideration of the Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the Respondents’ Answer to Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus, the Petitioner’s ”Traverse Response” to Respondents’ Answer Filed, the

Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge David R.

Strawbridge and the petitioner’s objections to the Report and Recommendation, and after

a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:

1. The petitioner’s objections are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Strawbridge is

APPROVED and ADOPTED;

1

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and,

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

 s/ Timothy J. Savage 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:05-cv-02300-TJS Document 69 Filed 02/26/09 Page 1 of 1