alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WALTER V. LUCAS,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0586 GEB CMK P

vs.

B. ARNOLD, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

On September 8, 2005, plaintiff filed a “notificatione [sic] of change of address.” 

That document was not served on defendants. Plaintiff is advised that every document submitted

to the court for consideration must be served on defendants. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5. Documents not to

be served electronically are usually served by placing a copy in the U.S. mail. If an attorney has

filed a document with the court on behalf of any defendants, then documents submitted by

plaintiff must be served on that attorney and not on the defendants. Every document submitted

conventionally to the court (e.g., by a prisoner proceeding pro se) must include a certificate

stating the date an accurate copy of the document was mailed to defendants or their attorney and

the address to which it was mailed. See Local Rule 5-135(b) and (c).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fifteen days from the date of

this order plaintiff shall serve a copy of plaintiff’s September 8, 2005 “notificatione [sic] of

Case 2:04-cv-00586-CMK Document 45 Filed 09/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

change of address” on counsel for defendants and shall file proper proof of said service. Plaintiff

is cautioned that failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. 

Plaintiff is further cautioned that failure to serve any documents subsequently filed in this action

properly, and failure to include a proper certificate of service with such filing, may result in a

recommendation that this action be dismissed.

DATED: September 13, 2005.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00586-CMK Document 45 Filed 09/15/05 Page 2 of 2
DRAFT IV IRC Handout December 5, 2019

Part 2 Fiscal Year 2020 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT SECTION IV

USSGL ACCOUNT ATTRIBUTE DEFINITION REPORT

Attribute

Name 

Short 

Name 

Attribute 

Definition Domain

System 

Chars Reference

Supplied

By 

Disaster Emergency 

Fund Code

DEFC Distinguishes whether the budgetary resources, obligations 

incurred, unobligated and obligated balances, and outlays are 

classified as disaster, emergency, or neither. Note - Once a 

disaster has been identified, the title "Disaster and Emergency 

Item 1" for example will be replaced with the actual title 

identified by OMB such as "Emergency PL 115-56."

A - Emergency PL 115-56

B - Emergency PL 115-72

C - Emergency PL 115-123

D - Emergency PL 115-254

E - Emergency PL 116-20

F - Emergency PL 116-26

G - Disaster and Emergency Item 7

H - Disaster and Emergency Item 8

I - Disaster and Emergency Item 9

J - Disaster and Emergency Item 10

Q - Non Disaster or Emergency

1/A OMB 

Guidance/TFM

Bulk File
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051828
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-24-1999
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                   485,231
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               493,781
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 493,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,549
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    412,372
<COMMON>                                        72,860
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   493,781
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,810
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,810
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,810
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
No. 54604.

#### Edward Lembeck & Bros, et al. *v.*United States,

protests 122060-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2427

ROBERT EDWARD THORNTON, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus D. F. BILLETT, Administrative Law Judge; CARROLL H. CRAWFORD, Vocational Expert; JANE L. WARREN, DDS Examiner; SUSAN KING MARTIN, DDS Examiner, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-01-2520-6-22BC) Submitted: January 28, 2002 Decided: February 7, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Robert Edward Thornton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Robert Edward Thornton, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging that the Appellees improperly handled his social security case. Finding no reversible error, we affirm. We find that the action is most properly construed as oneunder Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). As noted by the district court, Thornton does not specify any claim against the Appellees other than that they improperly handled his application for socialsecurity benefits and improperly evaluated him. Even if we liberally construe his complaint to allege due process violations, we find that Thornton fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under Bivens . See Schweiker v. Chilicky , 487 U.S. 412, 428-29 (1988).Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
----

----

III Informations

Commission

----

OFFICE EUROPÉEN DE LUTTE ANTIFRAUDE (OLAF)

Publication d'un avis de vacance pour les postes de

directeur des «Enquêtes et opérations II» (OLAF.B)

(AD 14 — Réf. COM/2006/10031)

et de directeur du «Soutien opérationnel et politique» (OLAF.C)

(AD 14 — Réf. COM/2006/10032)

(2006/C 238 A/01)

Présentation

Nous sommes l'Office européen de lutte antifraude (OLAF). La lutte contre la fraude préjudiciable aux intérêts financiers des Communautés européennes est essentielle pour la crédibilité du projet européen. Elle constitue dès lors une priorité importante pour l'ensemble des institutions européennes. L'OLAF est à la fois un service d'enquête et la direction générale de la Commission chargée de la conception et de la mise en œuvre de la politique antifraude.

Postes proposés

Les candidats doivent:

Les directeurs seront choisis et nommés par la Commission conformément à ses procédures de sélection et de recrutement. La rémunération et les conditions d'emploi sont celles prévues par le statut du personnel pour les fonctionnaires de grade AD 14 des Communautés européennes. La Commission applique une politique d'égalité des chances.

Pour toute précision complémentaire concernant le poste à pourvoir, les critères de sélection et les conditions de candidature, consultez:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_fr.htm

Le lien vers l'inscription en ligne est:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_fr.html

Si vous rencontrez des difficultés techniques, veuillez vous adresser par courrier à:

admin-management-online@ec.europa.eu.

La date limite d'inscription est fixée au 6 novembre 2006. L'inscription en ligne sera clôturée à midi, heure de Bruxelles.

----
(Part 1SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection I) (U.S. Standard General LedgerChart of Accounts) (Account Number) (Normal Balance) (Title)

 (Bulletin No. 2019-10) (I CA - 10) (June 2019)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GRACE LAWRENCE

Plaintiff,

v.

TRANS UNION LLC

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA

Defendant.

C.A. NO: 02-CV-4440

ORDER

AND NOW, this ____ day of 2003, for good cause shown, the parties joint motion for an

extension of time is GRANTED and this Court’s scheduling order is amended as follows:

This case shall be placed into the trial pool on or after August 25, 2003, or as soon thereafter

as all dispositive motions have been decided.

No other deadlines set by this Court in previous orders shall be affected by this ruling.

______________________________________

Anita B. Brody, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 16-2 Filed 06/10/2003 Page 1 of 1
# sec5_scnp_2023

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (IN
THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         140,601
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     51,379
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               210,664
<PP&E>                                          23,365
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,156)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 414,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,352
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            12
<OTHER-SE>                                     331,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   414,177
<SALES>                                         13,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,306
<CGS>                                           10,752
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,752
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,358
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 162
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (44,944)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (44,944)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (44,944)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.38)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                       TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Zaki Rakib, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

         (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: May 15, 2003                          By:      /s/ Zaki Rakib
                                                     --------------
                                                     Zaki Rakib
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
**Part 1, Section II: Accounts and Definitions**

The account descriptions provide basic information about each USSGL account, including:

**Account Title**

**Account Number**

**Normal Balance of the Account (Debit or Credit)**

**Account Definition**

Page 2 of 2

# image1.jpg
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'Etat (Belgium) lodged on 15 September 2006 — Clear Channel Belgium S.A. v City of Liège

(Case C-378/06)

(2006/C 261/32)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d'Etat (Belgium)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Clear Channel Belgium S.A.

Defendant: City of Liège

Intervener: J.-C. Decaux Belgium S.A.

Questions referred

----

(1)OJ L 209, 24.07.1992, p. 1.

----
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We have issued our reports dated November 30, 2006 accompanying the consolidated financial statements and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financing reporting included in the Annual Report of Innovex, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2006.  We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements of Innovex, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-14776, effective June 3, 1987, File No. 33-27530, effective March 17, 1989, File No. 33-59035, effective May 2, 1995, File No. 333-10045, effective August 13, 1996, File No. 333-10047, effective August 13, 1996, File No. 333-79427, effective May 27, 1999, File No. 333-37380, effective May 19, 2000, File No. 333-68228, effective August 23, 2001, File No. 333-83452, effective February 27, 2002 and File No. 333-112648, effective February 10, 2004) and Forms S-3 (No. 333-106734,effective July 29, 2003 and File No. 333-121981, effective January 31, 2005).

| \s\ GRANT THORNTON LLP |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |   |
| Minneapolis, Minnesota |   |
| December 7, 2006       |   |
Opinion issued August 23, 2012 

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-12-00696-CR

IN RE KENNETH RAY BROWN, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

By petition for writ of mandamus, relator, Kenneth Ray Brown, seeks 

mandamus relief from the Tenth Court of Appeals’s January 21, 1988 judgment 

affirming his conviction.

We DENY the petition for writ of mandamus. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings and Keyes. 

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
# 4

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 37

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 42

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 125

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 126

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 127

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 128

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 129

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 130

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 131

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 132

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20

# 133

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/3/20
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extendicare Health Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Mark W. Durishan, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company, certify solely for purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based
on my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




 /s/ MARK W. DURISHAN
----------------------------
Mark W. Durishan
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
August 14, 2002



                                       24
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-16	&"Arial,Bold"VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"September 2022
# sec6_rsonp_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSOCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2019
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Bonnie M. Klein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 31, 2007



/s/ Bonnie M. KleinBonnie M. KleinSenior Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial
Officer)
Part 1 Fiscal Y

SUPPLEMENT 

USSGL ACCOUNT ATTRIBUTE DEFINITION REPORT 

Bulletin No. 2016-05 IV ADR - 1 IRC Han

Attribute 

Name 

Attribute 

Short 

Name 

Attribute 

Definition Domain 

System 

Characters Referen

TAS Status Transitioning Code 

Trans. Code Expiring - Applies to annual and multi year accounts only. 

TAS Status Transitioning Flag is set to expiring in period 12 of the ending year of availability. Canceling - Applies to annual, multi and no- year accounts. For annual and multi year accounts, the TAS Status Transitioning Flag is set to cancelling in period 12 of the 5th expired year. For no-year accounts, the TAS Status Transitioning Flag is set to cancelling when the account has been discontinued.

X - Expiring K - Canceling N - Not applicable 

1/A TFM
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 61-2 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 2

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 61 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 61-2 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 2 of 2