alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DESMON LOEB,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0730 LKK PAN P

vs.

T. FELKER, et al.,

Defendants ORDER

 /

On January 3, 2006, plaintiff filed a request that the Clerk of the Court enter the

default of defendants T. Felker’s and A. Martin’s. He asserts these defendants failed timely to

plead in response to the complaint. 

A party who waives service of process must respond to the complaint within 60

days from the date the request for waiver was sent. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(d)(3). When a party against

whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as

provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and that fact is made to appear by affidavit or

otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party’s default. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). 

The court may set aside entry of default upon a showing of good cause. Fed. R.

Civ. P. 55(c). Good causes exists where the default did not result from culpable conduct or

where the defendant has a meritorious defense. Franchise Holding II, LLC. V. Huntington 

Case 2:04-cv-00730-LKK -EFB Document 50 Filed 04/26/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Restaurants, 375 F.3d 922, 925-26 (9th Cir. 2004). Where a party timely seeks relief from a

default and has a meritorious defense, default should be set aside. Mendoza v. Wight Vineyard

Management, 783 F.2d 941, 945-46 (9th Cir. 1986).

On October 13, 2005, defendants T. Felker and A. Martin conceded and explained

their default, and they answered the complaint. They assert counsel did not calendar time for

responding to the complaint because counsel already had answered on behalf of the other

defendants and did not realize she had failed to respond until she received plaintiff’s request for

entry of default. 

There is no evidence that these defendants intentionally failed to respond so as to

gain unfair advantage in the litigation. Counsel promptly explained the default and answered

upon realizing the error.

The Clerk of the Court has not entered defendants’ default and defendants have shown

good cause.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 3, 2006, motion

for default judgment is denied and the Clerk of the Court shall not enter defendants’ default.

DATED: April 24, 2006.

\004\loeb0730.dny dflt (jfm)

Case 2:04-cv-00730-LKK -EFB Document 50 Filed 04/26/06 Page 2 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

----oo0oo----

MICHAEL D. BURCH and THE

BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF MICHAEL

D. BURCH,

NO. CIV. S-04-0038 WBS GGH

Plaintiffs,

v. ORDER RE: EVIDENTIARY

OBJECTIONS

REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF

CALIFORNIA, LARRY VANDERHOEF,

GREG WARZECKA, PAM GILLFISHER, ROBERT FRANKS, and

LAWRENCE SWANSON,

Defendants.

----oo0oo----

Before the court is defendants’ motions for summary

judgment. On April 24, 2006, defendants filed approximately 120

objections to statements in the declarations of Michael Burch,

Richard Seyman, Michael Maben, Charlie Hong, David Amato, and

Earl Walker, Jr. (submitted in opposition to defendants’ motions)

and moved to strike the portions of these declarations to which

they objected. Defendants’ objections are made primarily on the

grounds that the statements at issue constitute hearsay,

Case 2:04-cv-00038-WBS-GGH Document 254 Filed 04/25/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

One of the questions which the parties might consider 1

addressing in their briefs is whether it would be a more

efficient and economical use of the court’s time simply to

proceed to trial and rule on the objections at that time rather

than to plow through all of them in the context of this motion

and then, if the motion is not granted in its entirety, face them

a second time at trial.

2

contradict the declarant’s deposition testimony, or are vague,

conclusory, lacking in foundation, argumentative, and/or

speculative. In addition and more generally, defendants move to

strike these declarations in their entirety because they are

unsworn. 

To rule on defendants’ motions for summary judgment,

the court must first decide these objections. Moreover, because

of the volume of objections and their detail, the court would

benefit from a full briefing of the issues raised. Accordingly, 1

plaintiffs are given 10 days from the date of this order to file

a response to defendants’ objections and/or amended declarations

that cure the objections. Defendants have 5 days thereafter to

file a response, if necessary. The hearing on the motions for

summary judgment is hereby rescheduled for Tuesday, May 30, 2006,

at 1:30 p.m. in Courtroom 5.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: April 25, 2006

Case 2:04-cv-00038-WBS-GGH Document 254 Filed 04/25/06 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 36 (Friday, February 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8166-8167]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3100]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


National Center for Environmental Health/Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry

    The Health Department Subcommittee of the Board of Scientific 
Counselors (BSC), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 
National Center for Environmental Health (NCEH)/Agency for Toxic 
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR): Teleconference Meeting.

[[Page 8167]]

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, NCEH/ATSDR announces the following teleconference meeting 
of the aforementioned subcommittee:

    Times and Dates: 12:30 p.m.-2 p.m., March 19, 2007.
    Place: Century Center, 1825 Century Boulevard, Atlanta, Georgia 
30345.
    Status: Open to the public, teleconference access limited only 
by availability of telephone ports.
    Purpose: Under the charge of the Board of Scientific Counselors, 
NCEH/ATSDR the Health Department Subcommittee will provide the BSC, 
NCEH/ATSDR with advice and recommendations on local and State health 
department issues and concerns that pertain to the mandates and 
mission of NCEH/ATSDR.
    Matters to be Discussed: The meeting will include a review of 
the agenda; approval of minutes from the last conference call; a 
discussion on identifying State and Local government issues; a 
discussion on bridging NCEH/ATSDR programs; public comment and the 
next steps for the Health Department Subcommittee.
    Items are subject to change as priorities dictate.
    Supplementary Information: This teleconference meeting is 
scheduled to begin at 12:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Savings Time. To 
participate, please dial 877/315-6535 and enter conference code 
383520. The public comment period is scheduled from 1:30 p.m.-1:40 
p.m.
    Contact Person for More Information: Shirley D. Little, 
Committee Management Specialist, NCEH/ATSDR, 1600 Clifton Road, Mail 
Stop E-28, Atlanta, GA 30303; telephone 404/498-0615, fax 404/498-
0059; E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#95e6f9fce1e1f9f0d5f6f1f6bbf2fae3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="96e5faffe2e2faf3d6f5f2f5b8f1f9e0">[email protected]</span></a>. The Director, Management Analysis and 
Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal 
Register notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other 
committee management activities for both CDC and the ATSDR.

    Dated: February 16, 2007.
Elaine L. Baker,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7-3100 Filed 2-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
FILED

April 23, 1997

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

MIDDLE SECTION AT NASHVILLE

DORRIS M. DARDEN, )

)

Plaintiff/Appellant, )

) Davidson Chancery

) No. 95-417-III

VS. )

) Appeal No.

) 01A01-9610-CH-00458

BILLY J. STOKES, Commissioner )

of the Tennessee Department of )

Employment Security, and )

ALVIN C. YORK VETERANS )

MEDICAL CENTER, )

)

Defendants/Appellees. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I concur with the results of the court’s opinion. The administrative record

contains substantial and material evidence supporting the Board of Review’s

conclusions that Ms. Darden’s job did not cause her manic-depressive condition

and, therefore, that Ms. Darden left her employment voluntarily and without good

cause connected with the work.

____________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 18

- 00184

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 236th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 236

- 280819

- 15

Before Kerr, Pittman, and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### S OUTHLAKE 

### A VIATION 

### , LLC , Appellant

V



### .

S OUTHLAND 

### P ROPERTY 

### T AX 

### C ONSULTANTS 

### , I NC



### . , Appellee2 MEMORANDU M OPINION AND JUDGMENT

We have considered “Southlake Aviation, LLC’ s Uno pposed Motion to
Dismiss Appeal ” and see no reason not to grant it. We therefore grant the motion and
dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay th e costs of this appeal
, for which let execution issue. See
Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 4 , 2018
# sec6_rsonp_2019

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RSOCNP - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2019
Order entered November 19, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01313-CV

INSURANCE ALLIANCE, Appellant/Cross-Appellee

V.

LAKE TEXOMA HIGHPORT, LLC, Appellee/Cross-Appellant

AND

BOWOOD PARTNERS, LIMITED, Appellee/Cross-Appellee

On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 08-0604-397

ORDER

We DENY Insurance Alliance’s March 5, 2014 request to take judicial notice of Lake 

Texoma Highport’s arbitration award. We also DENY Lake Texoma Highport’s November 25, 

2013 motion to strike the exhibits attached to Insurance Alliance’s reply brief.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4072 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 350
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4072

   To prohibit the use of funds to implement, administer, or enforce 
         certain rules of the Environmental Protection Agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

               March 23 (legislative day, March 22), 2024

   Mr. Crapo introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  ordered to be placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the use of funds to implement, administer, or enforce 
         certain rules of the Environmental Protection Agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING THE USE OF FUNDS TO IMPLEMENT, ADMINISTER, OR 
              ENFORCE CERTAIN RULES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 
              AGENCY.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of the funds made 
available for fiscal year 2024 may be used to implement, administer, or 
enforce the proposed rule of the Environmental Protection Agency 
entitled ``Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and 
Later Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles'' (88 Fed. Reg. 29184 (May 5, 
2023)), the final rule of the Environmental Protection Agency entitled 
``Multi-Pollutant Emissions Standards for Model Years 2027 and Later 
Light-Duty and Medium-Duty Vehicles'' and submitted for publication in 
the Federal Register on March 20, 2024, or any substantially similar 
rule.
                                                       Calendar No. 350

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4072

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To prohibit the use of funds to implement, administer, or enforce 
         certain rules of the Environmental Protection Agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

               March 23 (legislative day, March 22), 2024

           Read twice and ordered to be placed on the calendar
```
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT Fiscal Year 2019 Reporting

Section VII

Edit

No

Prior 

Year 

USSGL 

Account

Beginning

Ending 

Balance 

Indicator

Authority

Type Code

TAS 

Status

Reporting

Type Code

TAS Status 

Transitioning 

Code

Beginning

Balance 

USSGL 

Account

438400 E 438400

439400 E 439400

439401 E 439400

439600 E 439400

415700 E 439700

415800 E 439800

439800 E 439800

439801 E 439800

442000 E U N 445000

443000 E U N 445000

498100 E 490100

490800 E 490800

414201 E TBD

435400 E TBD

438500 E TBD

45 101000 E 101000

110100 E 110100

192500 E 192500

198000 E 198000

198100 E 198100

199000 E 199000

199500 E 199500

219200 E 219200

219300 E 219300

220000 E 220000

220500 E 220500

221000 E 221000

221100 E 221100

571000 E U 331000

571200 E U 331000

571300 E E/F/U 331000

572000 E E/F/U 331000

573000 E E/F/U 331000

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Closing Edits Detail Report

Bulletin No. 2018-08 DRAFT VII CER - 1 IRC Handout 7/12/18
EXHIBIT 32.01

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Wherify Wireless, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

November 15, 2005

                                                         /s/ Timothy Neher
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Timothy Neher
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of New Bastion Development, Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Elliot Bellen, Chief Executive Officer of our Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that, to my knowledge:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of our Company.

Date:  November 30, 2011

/s/ Elliot BellenElliot BellenChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Alister Cowan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 6, 2014

|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|                                     
|/s/ Alister Cowan                    
|Alister Cowan Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust III (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
for the period ended March 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III


                              By:  /s/ Marlene Debel
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: May 11, 2007
_____________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
December 1, 1953

No. 57672.

Suit 4773.

#### United States *v.*The Winkler-Koch Engineering Company.

C. D. 1494 affirmed November 2, 1953. C. A. D. 540.
II 

Calendar No. 452 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3946 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Major Billy 

D. Waugh Post Office’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2024 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1106 Main Street in Bastrop, Texas, as the 

‘‘Sergeant Major Billy D. Waugh Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SERGEANT MAJOR BILLY D. WAUGH POST OF4 FICE. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 1106 Main Street in Bastrop, 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3946 RS

1 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sergeant 

2 Major Billy D. Waugh Post Office’’. 

3 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg4 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

5 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

6 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sergeant Major Billy 

7 D. Waugh Post Office’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB

kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
Calendar No. 452 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3946 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostWaugh Post Office’’. Bastrop, Texas, as the ‘‘Sergeant Major Billy D. al Service located at 1106 Main Street in 

AUGUST 1, 2024 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 54012.

#### Asche Bandor Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 129366-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit
23
 
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
  We
consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-108975 of Indiana Michigan Power Company on Form S-3 of our reports dated
February 28, 2005 (which reports express unqualified opinions and include an
explanatory paragraph concerning the adoption of new accounting pronouncements
in 2003 and 2004) relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedules of Indiana Michigan Power Company appearing in and incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Indiana Michigan Power Company
for the year ended December 31, 2004.
  
 /s/
Deloitte & Touche, LLP
 
 Columbus,
Ohio
 March 1,
2005
# FIDS - Performance

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#		

# Version

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#	History
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 1 of 28

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 17

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 2 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 3 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 4 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 5 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 6 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 7 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 8 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 9 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 10 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 11 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 12 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 13 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 14 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 15 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 16 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 17 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 18 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 19 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 20 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 21 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 22 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 23 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 24 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 25 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 26 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 27 of 28
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 17 Filed 03/16/2006 Page 28 of 28