alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TYRONE ACOSTA, : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

 :

v. :

: NO. 05-1425

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL :

SECURITY :

Defendant. :

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2006, upon consideration of the parties’ Motions

for Summary Judgment, and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United

States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, to which no objections have been filed, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;

3. The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

4. The Clerk is directed to enter JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND

AGAINST PLAINTIFF and to mark this case closed for statistical purposes.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Paul S. Diamond, J.

_______________________

Paul S. Diamond, J.

Case 2:05-cv-01425-PD Document 13 Filed 02/23/06 Page 1 of 1
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3951 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for adjustments 

to the Medicare part D cost-sharing reductions for low-income individuals. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 14, 2024 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for adjustments to the Medicare part D cost-sharing 

reductions for low-income individuals. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cutting Copays Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENTS TO MEDICARE PART D COST-SHAR6 ING REDUCTIONS FOR LOW-INCOME INDIVID7 UALS. 

8 Section 1860D–14(a) of the Social Security Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 1395w–114(a)) is amended— 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3951 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1)(D)(ii), by striking ‘‘that 

2 does not exceed $1 for’’ and all that follows through 

3 the period at the end and inserting ‘‘that does not 

4 exceed— 

5 ‘‘(I) for a plan year before 

6 2026— 

7 ‘‘(aa) for a generic drug or a 

8 preferred drug that is a multiple 

9 source drug (as defined in section 

10 1927(k)(7)(A)(i)), $1 or, if less, 

11 the copayment amount applicable 

12 to an individual under clause 

13 (iii); and 

14 ‘‘(bb) for any other drug, $3 

15 or, if less, the copayment amount 

16 applicable to an individual under 

17 clause (iii); and 

18 ‘‘(II) for plan year 2026 and 

19 each subsequent plan year— 

20 ‘‘(aa) for a generic drug, $0; 

21 ‘‘(bb) for a preferred drug 

22 that is a multiple source drug (as 

23 defined in section 

24 1927(k)(7)(A)(i)), the dollar 

25 amount applied under this clause 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3951 IS

1 for such a drug for the preceding 

2 year, increased by the annual 

3 percentage increase in the con4 sumer price index (all items; U.S. 

5 city average) as of September of 

6 such preceding year, or, if less, 

7 the copayment amount applicable 

8 to an individual under clause 

9 (iii); and 

10 ‘‘(cc) for a drug not de11 scribed in either item (aa) or 

12 (bb), the dollar amount applied 

13 under this clause for such a drug 

14 for the preceding year, increased 

15 in the manner specified in item 

16 (bb), or, if less, the copayment 

17 amount applicable to an indi18 vidual under clause (iii). 

19 Any amount established under item (bb) or 

20 (cc) of subclause (II), that is based on an 

21 increase of $1 or $3, that is not a multiple 

22 of 5 cents or 10 cents, respectively, shall 

23 be rounded to the nearest multiple of 5 

24 cents or 10 cents, respectively.’’; and 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 3951 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (4)(A)(ii), by inserting ‘‘(be2 fore 2026)’’ after ‘‘a subsequent year’’. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KESTER SANDY : CIVIL ACTION NO. 20-3290

:

v. : CRIMINAL NO. 04-324

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

MEMORANDUM

Savage, J. March 10, 2021

Petitioner Kester Sandy, who is currently an inmate in Otisville Correctional 

Facility, Otisville, New York, has filed a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 

He is serving a sentence imposed by a New York state court. The government has 

moved to dismiss the habeas petition for lack of jurisdiction because Sandy is not in 

federal custody in this district.

A habeas petition filed under § 2241 must be filed in the district where the prisoner 

is confined, and the prisoner must name the custodian at the facility where he is being 

held as the respondent. Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 435 (2004). The proper 

respondent is “the person who has custody over [the petitioner].” Id. At 434.

Petitioner is housed at Otisville Correctional Facility, Otisville, New York. The 

institution is in the Southern District of New York. Therefore, the petition should have 

been filed in that district, not this district. 

Additionally, Sandy has named the United States of America as the respondent 

instead of his custodian. The proper respondent is his present custodian in Otisville 

Correctional Facility where Sandy is housed.

Because Sandy has filed his § 2241 petition in the wrong district court and has not

Case 2:04-cr-00324-TJS Document 53 Filed 03/10/21 Page 1 of 2
2

named the proper respondent, we shall dismiss his petition without prejudice to his right 

to bring a § 2241 habeas petition in the proper district naming the appropriate respondent.

Case 2:04-cr-00324-TJS Document 53 Filed 03/10/21 Page 2 of 2
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-16	&"Arial,Bold"VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"September 2022
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-20087 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ALFONSO CORNEJO-JAIMES, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-278-ALL

-------------------- August 20, 2002 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Alfonso Cornejo-Jaimes (Cornejo) appeals his sentence for the offense of illegal reentry following deportation after having been convicted of an aggravated felony in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). Cornejo contends that the district court plainly erred when it delegated to the probation officer the authority to determine his ability to pay the costs of drug abuse detection. Cornejo’s argument is foreclosed by our opinion inNo. 02-20087 -2- United States v. Warden , 291 F.3d 363, 365-66 (5th Cir. 2002). Cornejo also argues that the “aggravated felony provision” of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is unconstitutional on its face and as applied. Cornejo acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 489-90 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for possible further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984. Moreover, Cornejo’s indictment did allege that he had been deported after having been convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2). Thus, to the extent that he contends that the indictment failed to allege his prior aggravated felony conviction, his argument lacks factual support in the record.
AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2
TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
CERTIFICATION
In connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “Report”), I, Mark A. Richman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as ofthe date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United StatesCode, that to the best of my knowledge:
 (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and  (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for theperiods indicated.
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
     This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and ExchangeCommission.     Date: May 9, 2005   By /s/ Mark A. Richman       Mark A. Richman   Chief Financial Officer
18400 V ON K ARMAN A VENUE , S UITE 800 I RVINE , C ALIFORNIA 92612

- 0514 T ELEPHONE (949) 760

- 1121 / F AX (949) 720

- 0182

Direct Dial Number: (949) 224

- 6247 Direct Facsimile Number: (949) 224

- 6407 E

- Mail Address: pfraidenburgh@buchalter.com

December 18, 2015

SUBMITTED ELECTRONIC ALLY (VIA REGULATION S.GOV)

Ms. Thuy H. Cooper Senior Rulemaking Analyst Airspace and Airmen Rules Division Office of Rulemaking Federal Aviation Administration

Re: Request for Amendment to New Sky Perspectives, LLC ’s Exemption No. 1 2857

Dear Ms. Cooper :

T his is a request for an amendment to New Sky Perspectives, LLC ’s existing Section 333 E xemption to add additional aircraft to the exemption

- holder’s authorized commercial operations

. The Petitioner seeks an amendment authorizing the operation of the Acecore NEO aircraft as documented in the confidential and proprietary manuals submitted in support of this amendment request.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you should have any qu estions.

Best regards,

BUCHALTER NEMER A Professional Corporation

By

Paul J. Fraidenburgh Counsel for New Sky Perspectives, LLC

Los Angeles • Irvine • San Francisco • Scottsdale BN 18975993v1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Board announces the following meeting: 

*Date and Time:*                         Thursday, March 8, 2007, 11:30 a.m.-1 p.m. EST (teleconference meeting).                     

*Place:*                         National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, Virginia. Room 1235 will be available to the public to listen to this teleconference meeting.                     

*Type of Meeting:*                         Open.                     

*Contact Person:*                         Dr. Elizabeth Strickland, Commission Executive Secretary, National Science Board Office, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, VA 22230. Telephone: 703-292-4527. E-mail:                         *estrickl@nsf.gov*.                     

*Purpose of Meeting:*                         To discuss draft report.                     

*Agenda:*                         Discussion of draft report for submission to the National Science Board.                     

Susanne Bolton, 

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. E7-2967 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2020 ReportingSection VII&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/23/19
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SANTIAGO SOTO, 

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0571 FCD GGH P

vs.

WARDEN D.L. RUNNELS, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff has requested a 15-day extension of time to file and serve his objections

to the January 5, 2006 findings and recommendations. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s February 6, 2006 request for an extension of time is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted fifteen days from the date of this order in which to file and

serve his objections to the January 5, 2006 findings and recommendations.

DATED: 2/16/06

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

GGH:009/bb

soto0571.36

Case 2:04-cv-00571-FCD-GGH Document 44 Filed 02/16/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 1 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 2 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 3 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 4 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 5 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 6 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 7 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 8 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 9 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 10 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 11 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 12 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 13 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 14 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 15 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 16 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 17 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 18 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 19 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 20 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 21 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 22 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 23 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 24 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 25 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 26 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 27 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 28 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 29 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 30 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 31 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 32 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 33 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 34 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 35 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 36 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 37 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 38 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 39 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 40 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 41 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 42 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 43 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 44 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 45 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 46 of 47
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-3 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 47 of 47
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Asim Ghosh, President & Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|Date: March 8, 2013                
|                                   
|/s/ Asim Ghosh                     
|Asim Ghosh                         
|President & Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Jonathan P. Ward, the Chief Executive Officer of The  ServiceMaster  Company,
certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March
31, 2002,  fully  complies  with  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained in such Form
10-Q/A fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                            /S/ JONATHAN P. WARD
                            ---------------------
                            Jonathan P. Ward
                             Chief Executive Officer
                            May 13, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster  Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.














                                       25
<PAGE>
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 83

Dockets.Justia.com
----

Action brought on 4 August 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria

(Case C-340/06)

(2006/C 249/08)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker, acting as Agent)

Defendant: Republic of Austria

Form of order sought

The Court is asked to:

Pleas in law and main arguments

The period prescribed for transposition of the directive expired on 14 February 2005.

----

(1)OJ 2003 L 41, pp. 26-32

----
(Reap. Dec. 10988)

#### John S. James, C.H.B. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1896.

(Decided May 20, 1965)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General *(Samuel D. Spector,*trial attorney) , for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This is an appeal for reappraisement of certain elastic bandages which were appraised at the invoice unit values, less items identified as insurance, ocean freight, charges at Savannah, and United States customs duties, packed. Apparently, it is the contention *675of plaintiff that tbe items invoiced as “Inland freight” and “Charges” should also have been deducted from the appraised value.

At the trial of this action, plaintiff, appearing in his own behalf, introduced into evidence as plaintiff’s exhibit 1, a letter from the German manufacturer of the subject merchandise to the appraiser of merchandise at the port of Savannah, wherein the proposed classification of the merchandise is protested.

Since the letter contains no proof with respect to the value of the subject bandages and no other evidence has been submitted on behalf of plaintiff, the presumption of correctness of the appraiser’s finding of value has not been overcome. The values returned by the appraiser are, therefore, held to be the values of the various items of merchandise covered by this appeal for reappraisement.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust-Series A
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>
<CIK>               1051822
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust-Series A
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-2000

<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-30-2000

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos

<CASH>                          19,325,174

<SECURITIES>                    342,850

<RECEIVABLES>                   3,233

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                19,671,257

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  19,671,257

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           232,250

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      19,439,007

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    19,671,257

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                (1,920,889)

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   976,971

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (2,897,860)

<EPS-BASIC>                   (9.58)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>