alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 66307.

#### James G. Wiley Co., a/c Authentic Furniture Products *v.*United States,

protests 59/22131, 59/31900, and 60/1944 (Los Angeles).

*403Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall shelves similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Fabry Associates, Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 88, C.D. 2203), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 1 of 10

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 11

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/21/2006 Page 10 of 10
•

ADDENDUM NO.1

This addendum modifies the Grant Agreement between the U.S. Department of Transportation (the

Department), Kawerak, Inc. (Diomede's community representative), and Erickson Helicopters, Inc. (Erickson).

under the Air Transportation to Noneligible Places program (Agreement), which was entered into by the Parties

on July 17,2014.

The following modifications are agreed to by the Parties and hereby made to the Agreement, pursuant to

Section VI, paragraph (L) of the Agreement:

Re-desigoate Seetlon VI, paragraph (I)(b) as paragraph (I)(c), and;

Insert Section VI, paragraph (I)(b) as follows:

b. Kawerak may terminate this agreement provided that it gives the Department. the Alaska

Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, and Erickson at least 30 days' notice

before terminating the agreement.

Dated: 4t!}nsf If' ,2014 U.S. Department of Transportation

BY:~4v~ jJ

Susan L urland

Assistant Secretary for

•

Aviation and International Affairs

Dated: Av" '";1-1 , 2014 Kawerak, Inc.

By:~Q

Melanie Bahnke

President

Kawerak., Inc.

Dated: iv~fc? ! ,2014

\

B'/y,.

~T.RI uti

Vice President, General Counsel

Erickson Helicopters, Inc.
|    |                                                                                                                                                         |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2017 of International Speedway Corporation.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                     |
|---------------------|
|                     |  |  |  |
| Date:  May 24, 2018 | By:   | /s/ Gregory S. Motto |   |
|                |   | Gregory S. Motto |   |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

h1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147619

- 21

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147619

- 21

COA: 314071; 314239; 315493

Kalamazoo CC: 2011

- 001144

- FH

MORRIS LORENZO THOMAS,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 23, 2013 orders

of the Court of Appeal s is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2016 Reporting

Section V

Bulletin No. 2015-XX DRAFT - V BS - 1 IRC Handout 8-6-15

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/End Fed/NonFed Reporting Type Code Addl. Info.

17 214000 Accrued Interest Payable - Not Otherwise 

Classified

E F/G E/U

32 633000 Other Interest Expenses E F/G/N/Z E

33 633000 Other Interest Expenses E F/G/N/Z U

USSGL Crosswalk - Balance Sheet

Liabilities With the Public

Assets With the Public
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2016 Reporting

Section V

Bulletin No. 2015-XX DRAFT - V BS - 2 IRC Handout 8-6-15

Footnotes and Additional Information

1. Use USSGL proprietary account attribute domain values as provided in USSGL Section 

IV, page 4.

2. Related to Government Account Series securities purchased using deposit funds. The 

Fed/Nonfed attribute domain value of Z was added to TFM 2-4700 in order to be able to 

correctly classify any Government Account Series securities reported to this USSGL account. 

The amounts are reported to a Federal line on the Reclassified Balance Sheet in accordance 

with Section 4705.20e. On the Balance Sheet this domain value would be reported on a NonFederal line.

3. FASAB recognizes amounts returned to Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands as nonfederal custodial liabilities as referenced in FASAB SFFAS No. 7, paragraph 289.

4. The Fed/Nonfed attribute domain value of Z was added to TFM 2-4700 in order to be able 

to correctly classify any Government Account Series securities reported to this USSGL 

account. The amounts are reported to a Federal line on the Reclassified Balance Sheet in 

accordance with Section 4705.20e. On the Balance Sheet this domain value would be 

reported on a Non-Federal line.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I,Thaddeus Dupper, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that theQuarterly Report of Evolving Systems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for thequarterly period ended June 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirementsof Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in allmaterial respects the financial condition and results of operations of EvolvingSystems, Inc.

 
| /s/  THADDEUS DUPPER                  |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| Thaddeus  Dupper                      |   |
| Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer |   |
| August 5,  2010                  |   |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Suchcertification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into anyfiling under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act,except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
# sec5_custodialact_2022

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCA - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2022
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL ACTION

v.

OMAR LYONS NO. 05-543-1

 ORDER

AND NOW, this 14thday of December, 2018, upon consideration of the Pro Se “Motion

to Dismiss” (Doc. #101), “Motion to Appoint Counsel” (Doc. #106), “Motion to Dismiss” (Doc.

#113), “Motion for Status Hearing” (Doc. #115) and “Motion for Revocation of Detention

Order” (Doc. #118) filed by Defendant Omar Lyons and for the reasons stated on the record

during the December 13, 2018 violation hearing, it is ORDERED that the Motions are DENIED

AS MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

S/MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG

United States District Judge
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

:

v. : CRIMINAL ACTION

: No. 05-467-1

JAMES CARSTARPHEN :

 :

ORDER

 

This 15th day of September, 2023, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying 

memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s pro se motion pursuant to Rule 32.1 of 

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is DENIED.

 /s/ Gerald Austin McHugh

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00467-GAM Document 167 Filed 09/15/23 Page 1 of 1
#### Thomas WILSON and Carolyn Wilson, Appellees, v. James P. FERRELL, individually and officially of Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office; William J. Flannery, individually and officially of the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office; John Hill, individually and officially of the Hudson County Prosecutor’s Office; George F. Accomondo, individually and officially of the Port Authority Police Department; James O’Neill, individually and officially of the Port Authority Police Department, Appellants.

No. 83-1952.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 5, 1984.

Decided July 13, 1984.

*638James L. Mann, II, Columbia, S.C. (Mann & Rickborn, Columbia, S.C., James M. Shoemaker, Jr., Frank S. Holleman, III, Wyche, Burgess, Freeman & Parham, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for appellants,

Fletcher N. Smith, Jr., Greenville, S.C. (Theo W. Mitchell, Mitchell, Smith & Pauling, Greenville, S.C., on brief), for appellees.

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Upon further consideration of the facts, issues, and course of proceedings to date in this action, we are of opinion that permission to appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) was improvidently granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.*

*

We have been advised that the claims of the Wilsons against appellants Accomondo and O’Neill have been settled, but do not act on their motion for dismissal under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b) because the entire appeal has been dismissed. The parties should notify the district court of their settlement agreement for entry of an appropriate order in that court.
# C_2020036EN.01002101.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2019 — Banco Cooperativo Español v SRB

(Case T-323/16) (1)

(Economic and Monetary Union - Banking union - Single Resolution Mechanism for credit institutions and certain investment firms (SRM) - Single Resolution Fund (SRF) - Decision of the SRB on the 2016 ex-ante contributions - Action for annulment - Direct and individual concern - Admissibility - Essential procedural requirements - Authentication of the decision - Procedure for the adoption of the decision)

(2020/C 36/25)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Banco Cooperativo Español, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: D. Sarmiento Ramírez-Escudero and J. Beltrán de Lubiano Sáez de Urabain, lawyers)

Defendant: Single Resolution Board (represented by: F. Málaga Diéguez, F. Fernández de Trocóniz Robles, B. Meyring, S. Schelo, T. Klupsch and S. Ianc, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Rius, A. Steiblytė and K.-P. Wojcik, Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the SRB in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) to the extent that it concerns the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | annuls the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) to the extent that it concerns Banco Cooperativo Español, SA; |
| --- | --- |

1.

annuls the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) in its executive session of 15 April 2016 on the 2016 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2016/06) to the extent that it concerns Banco Cooperativo Español, SA;

| 2. | orders Banco Cooperativo Español and the SRB to bear their own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Banco Cooperativo Español and the SRB to bear their own costs;

| 3. | orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

---
SUMMARY OF PERPETUAL DEPOSIT AGREEMENT                              EXHIBIT 4.4


     Pursuant to agreements (by way of exchange of letters) that were entered
into at various times between us and the Israeli Treasury, we deposited with the
Israeli Treasury the capital from the offerings of our preferred shares (C, CC,
CC1, D and DD). The total principal amount of perpetual deposits with the
Treasury was NIS 806.5 million, as of December 31, 2004, as compared with NIS
799.3 million, as of December 31, 2003. Pursuant to these agreements, we are
entitled, regarding the amounts so deposited, to receive dollar-interest at the
annual rate of 7.5% of the dollar value of the deposits (as of the date of their
deposit), which will be paid net to us by the Treasury, on the dates that we
will declare the payment of a dividend for the above preferred shares, in such
manner that after the payment of taxes and other charges, the net amount of
interest that we receive from the Treasury will be at the above rate of 7.5%.

     The deposit agreements do not expressly stipulate how the interest on the
perpetual deposits should be handled during periods in which the Bank is
prevented from distributing dividends on these preferred shares, and whether the
interest will accrue and be paid when the Bank pays the accrued preferred
dividends in arrears or upon liquidation. See Note 15 to our financial
statements in Item 17 of this annual report for details on the cessation of
dividend distribution and the matter of the accrued interest on the perpetual
deposits with the Israeli Treasury.


     The principal amounts that we so deposited will be returned to us by the
Israeli Treasury only upon our liquidation or for the purpose of redemption of
preferred D and DD shares (which were offered as redeemable shares), with the
principal amounts being linked to the dollar from the date of their deposit with
the Treasury and until October 1987, and from October 1, 1987 until the date of
their repayment to us, linked to the Consumer Price Index or the dollar,
whichever is higher. The deposit agreements establish that the Treasury shall
not have a right of set-off as to amounts that we will receive regarding the
deposits thereby deposited.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31938]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Federal Advisory Committee Act; Board of Advisors Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463), the purpose of this notice is to announce that the Election 
Assistance Commission (EAC) has renewed the charter for the Board of 
Advisors for a two-year period through December 14, 2012. The Board of 
Advisors is a federal advisory committee under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act.

DATES: Renewed through December 14, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Election Assistance Commission, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., 
Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas R. Wilkey, Designated Federal 
Officer, at (202) 566-3100. E-mail: boardofadvisors@eac.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board of Advisors is a Federal advisory 
committee created by statute whose mission is to advise EAC through 
review of the voluntary voting system guidelines (VVSG) described in 
Title II Part 3 of HAVA when EAC proposes updates to the VVSG; through 
review of the voluntary guidance described under Title III subtitle B 
of HAVA; and through review of the best practices recommendations 
contained in the report submitted under Section 242(b) of Title II of 
HAVA.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-31938 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
```
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Ingles Markets, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2006
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert P. Ingle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    ROBERT P.
INGLE                                   
|Robert P. Ingle Chief Executive Officer  December 1, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7495

CLENARD BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

MICHAEL MOORE, Director of SCDC; DOUGLAS A.

ROBINSON, Construction Supervisor, SCDC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-96-1966-2-21AJ)

Submitted: January 7, 1997 Decided: January 24, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clenard Brown, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint without prejudice. A dismissal

without prejudice is not reviewable by the court unless the reasons

stated for the dismissal clearly disclose that no amendment to the

complaint could cure its defects. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar

Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993). In

the present case, the district court expressly referred Appellant

to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation for instructions on how to cure his defective complaint. The appeal is therefore dismissed. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



      Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
                to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


         The following statement is provided by the undersigned to accompany the
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and shall not be deemed filed
pursuant to any provision of the Exchange Act of 1934 or any other securities
law.

         The undersigned certifies that the foregoing Report on Form 10-K fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and that the information contained in the Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Ispat Inland Inc.



Date:   March 31, 2003                   /s/  MICHAEL G. RIPPEY
       ------------------------         ----------------------------------------
                                        Michael G. Rippey

                                        Executive Vice President,
                                        Finance, Sales & Administration
                                        and Chief Financial Officer
                                        Ispat Inland Inc.
EX-10.1





Exhibit 10.1









[DANA HOLDING CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]







July 1, 2008




Ralf Goettel

Reinzstrasse 3-7

Neu-Ulm, Bavaria 89233

Germany



Dear Ralf:




     On behalf of Dana Limited (“Dana”), I am pleased to inform you that Dana intends to provide
you with a Retention Incentive Award of one year’s salary (est. 320,000 €). The award is intended
to provide you a financial incentive to remain employed with the company and encourage your active
participation on several key business initiatives. Dana management believes your valuable services
are key to our ongoing success.



     This award will be payable to you in 18 months or at the accomplishment of several key
business initiatives (whichever comes first). In order to be eligible to receive the award you
must be an active Dana employee in good standing at the time of the occurrence of either of the
events described above and deliver the executed form of Release which is attached. Payment of the
award will be through the payroll process and will occur within thirty days subsequent to the first
of the above events to occur.



     We look forward to your ongoing contributions to the Business and have extended this award to
you with the expectation that you will continue to perform with the highest quality standards which
you have exhibited in the past.



     Congratulations and thank you for being part of our team.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Sincerely,

 	 
	 	/s/ Gary Convis
 	 
	 	Gary Convis, 	 
	 	Chief Executive Officer
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July

18, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR

– 2013
- 0602 FROM: Katherine Buckley , EPA/OITA SUBJECT: July

17, 2014 , Meeting Regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on July 17, 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
. The Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2 , 2014
. **ATTENDEES** Jo Ty ndall, New Zealand Climate Change Ambassador Justine Arroll, Second Secretary , New Zealand Embass y
No. 51657.

#### Protests 36652-K, etc., of H. P. Lambert Co., Inc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.