alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2008 - 0442 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2007 - SW - 24 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 1 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 2 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 3 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 4 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 5 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 6 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 7 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 8 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 9 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 10 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 11 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 12 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 13 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 14 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 15 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 16 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 17 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 18 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 19 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 20 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 21 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 22 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 23 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 24 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 25 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 26 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 27 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 28 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 29 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 30 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 31 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 32 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 33 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 34 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 35 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 36 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 5-4 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 37 of 37
----

----

I Tiedonantoja

Komissio

----

Lääkinnällisistä laitteista 14 päivänä kesäkuuta 1993 annetun neuvoston direktiivin 93/42/ETY täytäntöönpanoon liittyvä komission tiedonanto

(2006/C 216/01)

(ETA:n kannalta merkityksellinen teksti)

(Direktiivin soveltamisalaan kuuluvien yhdenmukaistettujen standardien nimet ja viitenumerot)

Huom:

Lisätietoja yhdenmukaistetuista standardeista saa Internet-osoitteesta

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/.

----

(1)  ESO: Eurooppalaiset standardointielimet:

(2)EYVL L 204, 21.7.1998, s. 37.

(3)EYVL L 217, 5.8.1998, s. 18.

----

----

Aktiivisia implantoitavia lääkinnällisiä laitteita koskevan jäsenvaltioiden lainsäädännön lähentämisestä 20 päivänä kesäkuuta 1990 annetun neuvoston direktiivin 90/385/ETY täytäntöönpanoon liittyvä komission tiedonanto

(2006/C 216/02)

(ETA:n kannalta merkityksellinen teksti)

(Direktiivin soveltamisalaan kuuluvien yhdenmukaistettujen standardien nimet ja viitenumerot)

Huom:

Lisätietoja yhdenmukaistetuista standardeista saa Internet-osoitteesta

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/.

----

(1)  ESO: Eurooppalaiset standardointielimet:

(2)EYVL L 204, 21.7.1998, s. 37.

(3)EYVL L 217, 5.8.1998, s. 18.

----

----

In vitro -diagnostiikkaan tarkoitetuista lääkinnällisistä laitteista 27 päivänä lokakuuta 1998 annetun Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston direktiivin 98/79/EY täytäntöönpanoon liittyvä komission tiedonanto

(2006/C 216/03)

(ETA:n kannalta merkityksellinen teksti)

(Direktiivin soveltamisalaan kuuluvien yhdenmukaistettujen standardien nimet ja viitenumerot)

Huom:

Lisätietoja yhdenmukaistetuista standardeista saa Internet-osoitteesta

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/.

----

(1)  ESO: Eurooppalaiset standardointielimet:

(2)EYVL L 204, 21.7.1998, s. 37.

(3)EYVL L 217, 5.8.1998, s. 18.

----
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 37 (Monday, February 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-3235]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-485-806]


Notice of Extension of Time Limit for the Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Certain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel 
Flat Products from Romania

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

EFFECTIVE DATE: February 26, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Dirstine, AD/CVD Operations 
Office 5, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, 
Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-4033.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On October 23, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) 
published its preliminary results of administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products 
from Romania. See Cetain Hot-Rolled Carbon Steel Flat Products from 
Romania: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 
Review, 71 FR 62082 (October 23, 2006). The period of review is 
November 1, 2004, through October 31, 2005. The final results of review 
are currently due no later than February 20, 2007.

Extension of Time Limit for Final Results

    The Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), provides at section 
751(a)(3)(A) that the Department will issue the final results of an 
administrative review of an antidumping duty order within 120 days 
after the date on which the preliminary determination is published. 
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act provides further that, if the 
Department determines that it is not practicable to complete the review 
within this time period, the Department may extend the 120-day period 
to 180 days.
    The Department has determined that it is not practicable to 
complete the preliminary results by the current deadline of February 
20, 2007, because it has extended the briefing schedule for interested 
parties and needs additional time to consider the issues raised in case 
and rebuttal briefs.
    Therefore, in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department is extending the time limit for 
the preliminary results by 45 days to April 6, 2007.
    We are issuing this notice in accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) 
of the Act.

    Dated: February 16, 2007.
Stephen J. Claeys,
Deputy Assistant Secretaryfor Import Administration.
[FR Doc. E7-3235 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2025 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2024-01	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 11/29/23
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

 :

v. : NO. 05-614-02

 :

PHILIP CHARTOCK :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 17th day of June, 2013, upon careful consideration of Mr. 

Chartock’s petition for writ of error coram nobis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 

(Document #294), the government’s response thereto (Document #295), and Mr. 

Chartock’s reply (Document #297), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is 

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that:

1. Mr. Chartock’s convictions on Counts Five and Six are VACATED.

2. Mr. Chartock’s convictions on the remaining counts remain. 

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
No. 50394.

#### Protests 107801-K, etc., of Traders Distributing Co. et al. (San Francisco, etc.).

*246Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1413 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 45 ) 11-1-4 5 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/9/2008 3:11:22 PM

Sheet 45 of 114P. 2
A-94-5 2 

### ii-r - 

### iiS: Docke t No . A-94-5 2 Categor y II- I Th e following information i s locate din th e confidentia l files ofth e Director , Emissio n Standard s Division , Offic

e o f Ai r Qualit y Planning an

dStandards , U.S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Research Triangl e Park , Nort h Carolin a27711 . Thi s information i s confidentia

l pendin g fina

l determinatio n b

y th e Administrato

r an di s no t availabl e fo

r publi c inspection . Premix , Inc. , Ashtabula , O H - contro l technology Info . 9 pp . N o Date .

A*- . . f ,r : v9" o ICOO I EP A AI R DOCKE T

CN-308-2 1 94185-C18-0 3
No. 63615.

protest 58/16343 (New York).

#### Erich S. Herrmann, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3900 

To prohibit no-knock warrants, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 11, 2024 

Mr. PAUL (for himself and Mr. BOOKER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit no-knock warrants, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Breonna 

5 Taylor Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON NO-KNOCK WARRANTS. 

7 (a) FEDERAL PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any 

8 other provision of law, a Federal law enforcement officer 

9 (as defined in section 115 of title 18, United States Code) 

10 may not execute a warrant until after the officer provides 

11 notice of his or her authority and purpose. 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3900 IS

1 (b) STATE AND LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGEN2 CIES.—Beginning in the first fiscal year beginning after 

3 the date of enactment of this Act, and each fiscal year 

4 thereafter, a State or local law enforcement agency that 

5 receives funds from the Department of Justice during the 

6 fiscal year may not execute a warrant that does not re7 quire the law enforcement officer serving the warrant to 

8 provide notice of his or her authority and purpose before 

9 forcibly entering a premises. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
No. 63056.

#### American Commercial Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/13917 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

An examination of the papers revealing that the merchandise consisted of poreelainware and not distilled spirits, the protest was dismissed.
Before the First Division,

June 12, 1956

No. 60024.

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 223580-K/5421 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20-4 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 10 of 10
# sec5_sbr_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2020-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2020
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION


1350




In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tongli
Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2009, I, Li Li, Chief
Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:




1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended June 30, 2009, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and




2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the year ended
June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Tongli Pharmaceuticals (USA),
Inc.





Dated:
      August 13, 2009/s/ Li LiLi
      LiChief
      Financial Officer
EX-10.32





Exhibit 10.32



ATARI, INC.

DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S FISCAL

YEAR 2008 ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN



     Target annual bonuses are set for each eligible employee based upon a
percentage of base salary. Bonuses are calculated based on three components,
one of which relates to the U.S. Company’s and/or the business unit’s profit
and revenue results, one of which is measured against worldwide cash flow,
profit and revenue results, and in the case of production related employees,
one of which is based on the timeliness of product delivery. If Atari, Inc.’s
worldwide operating profit attainment for the fiscal year is less than 80% of
the Company’s plan, no bonus is required to be paid for the fiscal year;
bonuses then become discretionary. If profits and/or revenue exceed plan for
the fiscal year the bonus rate is accelerated for the incremental profits and
revenue above plan, with a maximum of 150% payout of the bonus target.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DARRYL WAYNE OAK,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0624 FCD DAD P

vs.

GOVERNMENT CLAIMS 

BRANCH, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action

seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On September 29, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections

to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that: 

Case 2:04-cv-00624-FCD-DAD Document 16 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 29, 2005, are adopted in

full; and

2. This action is dismissed for failure to state a claim.

DATED:November 9, 2005

/s/ Frank C. Damrell Jr. 

FRANK C. DAMRELL JR.

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00624-FCD-DAD Document 16 Filed 11/09/05 Page 2 of 2
0691922.01

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSEPH MARINO :

: CIVIL ACTION

v. :

: NO. 02-cv-4488

KENT LINE INTERNATIONAL d/b/a :

VOYAGEUR SHIPPING LTD. :

and :

SLS, INC. d/b/a HOLT OVERSIGHT AND :

LOGISTICAL TECHNOLOGIES :

and :

INCHCAPE SHIPPING :

PRAECIPE

TO THE CLERK:

Kindly be advised that Exhibits in Support of Defendant’s Notice of Removal and 

Defendant’s Amended Notice of Removal have been filed in hard copy only

RAWLE & HENDERSON LLP

By:_______________________________

Carl D. Buchholz, III, Esquire

Ann-Michele G. Higgins, Esquire

Attorneys for Defendant,

Inchcape Shipping

Date: _____________________________

Case 2:02-cv-04488-BMS Document 4 Filed 07/17/2002 Page 1 of 2
0691922.01

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the Praecipe on behalf of 

defendant Inchcape Shipping, was sent by First Class Mail, postage prepaid, to the following 

counsel and/or parties of record:

Thomas More Holland, Esquire

Law Offices of Thomas More Holland

1522 Locust Street

Grace Hall 

Philadelphia, PA 19102

Attorney for Plaintiff

RAWLE & HENDERSON LLP

By:_______________________________

Ann-Michele G. Higgins, Esquire 

Attorneys for Defendant,

Inchcape Shipping

The Widener Building

One South Penn Square

Philadelphia, PA 19107

(2l5) 575-4200

DATED: _______________________________

Case 2:02-cv-04488-BMS Document 4 Filed 07/17/2002 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 4000 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 510
118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 4000

                          [Report No. 118-223]

 To reaffirm the applicability of the Indian Reorganization Act to the 
        Lytton Rancheria of California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2024

  Mr. Padilla introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

                           September 12, 2024

               Reported by Mr. Schatz, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To reaffirm the applicability of the Indian Reorganization Act to the 
        Lytton Rancheria of California, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LYTTON RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA LAND REAFFIRMATION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Lytton Rancheria of California is subject to the Act of June 18, 1934 
(commonly known as the ``Indian Reorganization Act'') (48 Stat. 984, 
chapter 576; 25 U.S.C. 5101 et seq.), and the Secretary of the Interior 
may acquire and take into trust land for the benefit of the Lytton 
Rancheria of California pursuant to section 5 of that Act (25 U.S.C. 
5108).
    (b) Land To Be Made Part of the Reservation.--Land taken into trust 
pursuant to subsection (a) shall be--
            (1) part of the reservation of the Lytton Rancheria of 
        California; and
            (2) administered in accordance with the laws and 
        regulations generally applicable to property held in trust by 
        the United States for an Indian Tribe.
                                                       Calendar No. 510

118th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 4000

                          [Report No. 118-223]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To reaffirm the applicability of the Indian Reorganization Act to the 
        Lytton Rancheria of California, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 12, 2024

                       Reported without amendment
```
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

27E

Credit Cohort Year and Financing Account Code Validation

If Financing Account Code for the TAS is D (Direct) or G (Guaranteed) on the SMAF and the USSGL account is budgetary, then the Credit Cohort Year is required. Otherwise, Credit Cohort Year should be null.

CREDIT 

COHORT YEAR

CONCATENATE

D TAS

FINANCING 

ACCOUNT 

CODE

Pass 2019 012 X4158000 DPass 2019 012 X4158000 GPass 2019 086 X4587000 DPass 2019 086 X4587000 G

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Draft Bulletin No. 2017-06 VII VDR - 1
.

UNrrEn STATU DISTRICT COU:R.T

EASTERN DISTRICl' OJ' PENNSYLV ANJA

)

S cou Rttffina and I(jmb=r1y Ruffing" ) CivU Action No. 02-CV-442Z

)

Plai~, )

)

Y. )

)

Kg1mar ~~ US~ !Dc.. XI..NJ, LLC )

And Transportation.Equipment ~c~ !no. )

)

Dd'eIJdanm. )

)

S1'~TION OF mS~AL

And now~ this 24,da day of JUDB~ 2003, it is her=by agxeed 'by and ~ coB8C'J of

.!eCCIrd for all paxtie8 that tbis action Is h~by diSl!!iaed pursuant to F.~C.P. 41 (a)(l) ag to

dofo!Jd8.tl1 Trunsportation Equi:pment Se,r"wss~ Inc. ~~::::~~~~~~~~~:= -.

Richard Stola1f. P.'f:I. -

CoUDsclforPWIrtiffil

Scott and K:imbqiy Ruffing

J.. 1];- ~ d..- '

~~!~ -; ._~ ~- -

~~~ Industries~ htc./ KI-NJ UC

Case 2:02-cv-04422-TJS Document 25 Filed 06/27/2003 Page 1 of 1
21.11 Approve a Batch