alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.0



                       EXTENDEDCARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC.

                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
              (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months ended
                                                              March 31
                                                        2000         1999
                                                      --------     --------

<S>                                                   <C>          <C>
Net Earnings                                          $(10,522)    $ (5,793)
Weighted Average Number of
  Common Shares Outstanding                                947          947
                                                      --------     --------

Net earnings per Common Share                         $   (11)     $     (6)
                                                      =======      ========
</TABLE>
The Company does not have a complex capital structure and therefore, only has
basic earnings per share.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                               
<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>                                    Optional or Required When Applicable
 This schedule contains summary financial   Optional or Required When Applicable
 information extracted from Saucony, Inc.'s
 Form  10-K for the  period  ended  January  1, 1999 and is  qualified  in its
 entirety by reference to such 10-K.
</LEGEND>                            
<CIK>  0000049401                    
<NAME>  Saucony, Inc.               
<MULTIPLIER> 1000                    
                                     
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                      Jan-03-1998 
<PERIOD-END>                        Jan-01-1999
<CASH>                                   5495
<SECURITIES>                              179
<RECEIVABLES>                           19473
<ALLOWANCES>                             1880
<INVENTORY>                             31072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        59142
<PP&E>                                  18119
<DEPRECIATION>                           9996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          69879
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   18840
<BONDS>                                   559
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                 2178
<OTHER-SE>                              46072
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            69879
<SALES>                                105074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       105810
<CGS>                                   67623
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           67623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        32446
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          775
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          5238
<INCOME-TAX>                             1629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      3579
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                             3579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0.56
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PETER KEENAN : CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-4420

UNUM PROVIDENT CORPORATION,

Successor-in-interest to Paul Revere Life

Insurance Company

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 7TH day of May, 2003,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Marie O’Donnell 

 Deputy Clerk

Civ 2 (8/2000)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-04420-AB Document 23 Filed 05/07/2003 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> BD
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Inter-Regional Financial Group, Inc.'s December 31, 1995 Form 10-K and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         437,167
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,102,348
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                             80,233
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0<F1>
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            322,892
<PP&E>                                          31,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,021,908
<SHORT-TERM>                                    97,000
<PAYABLES>                                   1,372,044
<REPOS-SOLD>                                   120,808
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0<F2>
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                              61,050
<LONG-TERM>                                     41,410
<COMMON>                                         1,508
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     222,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,021,908
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              179,180
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           109,393
<COMMISSIONS>                                  175,987
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                   89,763
<FEE-REVENUE>                                   27,088<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              64,777
<COMPENSATION>                                 345,834
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,271
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      35,873
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    35,873
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.81
<FN>
<F1>Included in Receivables
<F2>Included in Payables
<F3>Includes fees from Asset Management only
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 99.5

                                  CERTIFICATION

                        Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust
                           Series 2000-A (the "Trust")

I, Keith W. Schuck, the chief financial officer of Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, the depositor of assets into the above-referenced Trust ,
certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the sale
         and servicing agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in
         these reports;

4.       Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
         in this annual report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
         accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and
         except as disclosed in this annual report, the servicer has fulfilled
         its obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement; and

5.       This annual report discloses all significant deficiencies relating to
         the servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based
         upon the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         sale and servicing agreement, that is included in this annual report.





Date:    March 28, 2003


/s/ Keith W. Schuck
--------------------------------------
Name:    Keith W. Schuck
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Company: Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CRAIG ALLEN RODGERS, Appellant, vS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 83816



# FILED
DEC 1 3 2021
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY < %. 1 DEPEI 5 iY CLE tt This is a pro se appeal "from the ORDER denying and/or dismissing the petition for rehearing/reconsideration motion to modify ruled on the 12 day of October, 2021." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Susan Johnson, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for reconsideration in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

P rraguir

t r 11 7 8116.14.....1".

, J. Stiglich

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A - 3~ 3440

### cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Craig Allen Rodgers Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) i947A 

### 2
EXHIBIT 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                              Jurisdiction of      Percentage
              Name                             Incorporation       Ownership
------------------------------------          ---------------      ----------

Hyde, Inc.                                      Maine                 100%

Saucony Canada, Inc.(1)                         Ontario                95%

Saucony UK, Inc.(1)                             Massachusetts         100%

Saucony Sports, B.V.(1)                         Netherlands           100%

Saucony Deutschland Vertriebs GmbH(1)           Germany               100%

QR Divestiture, Inc.(2)                         Delaware              100%

Saucony Asia Pacific Limited                    Hong Kong             100%



______________________

(1)Does business as "Saucony."
(2)Formerly known as Quintana Roo, Inc.
EXHIBIT
31.2





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Brian
Chaiken, the principal financial officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc., certify
that:





1.           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.;





2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4.           The
registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:





(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;





(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based upon such evaluation; and





(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants' fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting;





5.           The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors:





(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any
material weaknesses in internal controls; and





(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.






August
      19, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Brian
      ChaikenBrian
      ChaikenChief
      Financial Officer (Principal
      Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions
Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust  Series A (Series A), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series As Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series A.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer     
|Kenneth A. Shewer         
|Co-Chief Executive Officer
|May 15, 2006
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

OPTHALMIC IMAGING SYSTEMS,

a California corporation,

NO. CIV. S-04-482 LKK/DAD

Plaintiff,

v.

MARK FUKUHARA, an individual;

DOUGLAS BURLAND, an individual;

MICHAEL GERKOVICH, an individual;

STEVEN LEACH, an individual;

EDMUND PETERSON, an individual;

DAN SALOMON, an individual; JOE

SILVA, an individual; DALE BRODSKY,

an individual; EYEPICTURES, INC., a

Missouri corporation; JUSTICE

OPTHALMICS, INC., a Tennessee

corporation; ZETA DEVELOPMENT LABS,

INC., a Tennessee corporation; and

JOHNNY JUSTICE, JR., an individual,

Defendants.

 /

STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER

Pursuant to court order, a Status (pretrial scheduling)

Conference was held in Chambers on October 24, 2005. STEPHEN DAVIS

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 183 Filed 10/27/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

appeared as counsel for plaintiff; LAWRENCE BRAGG appeared as

counsel for defendants Brodsky and Eyepictures; MARA LEE MacDONALD

appeared as counsel for defendant Zeta Development; RICHARD

BERTOLINO belatedly appeared as counsel for defendant Burland;

Defendant Silva, now in propria persona, failed to appear. 

At the hearing the parties represented that they have no objections

to the previously-set dates and those dates shall remain in effect.

MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Richard Bertolino, counsel for defendant Burland, failed to

timely appear at the Status Conference. Accordingly, counsel for

defendant Burland is SANCTIONED in the amount of one hundred and

fifty ($150.00) dollars. This sum shall be paid to the Clerk of

the Court no later than thirty (30) days from the effective date

of this order. Counsel shall file an affidavit accompanying the

payment of this sanction which states that it is paid personally

by counsel, out of personal funds, and is not and will not be

billed, directly or indirectly, to the client or in any way made

the responsibility of the client as attorneys' fees or costs.

Defendant Silva failed to appear at the hearing. Accordingly,

defendant Silva is now ORDERED to SHOW CAUSE in writing within ten

(10) days why sanctions should not be imposed for his failure to

appear.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 25, 2005.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00482-LKK -DAD Document 183 Filed 10/27/05 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                    SFX ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                  EXHIBIT 11.1
              STATEMENT REGARDING CALCULATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
              (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED            NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                            ------------------            -----------------
                                                               SEPTEMBER 30,                SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                               -------------                -------------


                                                             1998         1997            1998         1997
                                                             ----         ----            ----         ----
<S>                                                      <C>           <C>            <C>             <C>       
Average Common Shares Outstanding                        30,420,883    14,626,061     23,262,122      14,382,778
Net effect of dilutive  stock  options - based on the
treasury  stock  method  using  average market price        460,894             -              -               -

Common and Dilutive Shares Outstanding                   30,881,777    14,626,061     23,262,122      14,382,778

                                                                                     $   (30,203)    $     3,652
Net income (loss)                                        $   18,336    $    3,361
                                                        ------------  -------------  -------------  ----------------
Less: Accretion or stock subject to accretion                   825             -          1,925               -
                                                        ------------  -------------  -------------  ----------------

Net income (loss) applicable to common shares            $   17,511    $    3,361    $   (32,128)    $     3,652
                                                        ============  =============  =============  ================
Basic net income (loss) per common share                 $     0.58    $     0.23    $    ( 1.38)    $      0.25
                                                        ============  =============  =============  ================
Dilutive net income (loss) per common share              $     0.57    $     0.23    $     (1.38)    $      0.25
                                                        ============  =============  =============  ================
</TABLE>
\

ce

4) .
/\ we IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DONALD HOMAN,
Petitioner, :
v. : CRIMINAL NOS. 05-CR-708, 07-689
CIVIL NO. 10-7256
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : Fi L E D
Respondent. :
APR 1 2 2013
ORDER lad & RUNZ Glen

C80. Clerk

AND NOW, this 11" day of April 2013, upon consideration of the Petition filed in the
above captioned action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Doc. No. 55] and the Government’s
Response and Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 58], it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

lL. Petitioner Donald Homan’s Petition is DISMISSED without prejudice for
lack of jurisdiction;
2. The Government’s Motion is DISMISSED as MOOT;
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.
It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

=~ P Cova mait
1

The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Missouri.

2

In 2002, Rule 41 was reorganized, and the substance of former subsection (e)

was incorporated into subsection (g). See Fed. R. Crim. P. 41 advisory committee’s

notes (2002 amends.) (language of Rule 41 was amended as part of general restyling

of Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; except as otherwise noted, changes were

intended to be stylistic only).

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-2394

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* Eastern District of Missouri.

Isaac Pike, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: November 30, 2010

Filed: December 6, 2010

___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Isaac Pike appeals the district court’s1

 denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 41(e)2

 motions for the return of property. Upon reviewing the district
-2-

court’s legal conclusions de novo and its findings of fact for clear error, see Jackson

v. United States, 526 F.3d 394, 396 (8th Cir. 2008), we conclude that the district court

properly denied Pike’s motions for the reasons it stated. Accordingly, we affirm. See

8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________