alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS*I, Mel Rhinelander, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Extendicare HealthServices, Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Extendicare HealthServices, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting./s/ Mel Rhinelander
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-2 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 1

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 55 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com
USSGL: Standard General Ledger - Federal Trust Fund Accounting Guide Cover Letter

The US Standard General Ledger (USSGL)

The cornerstone of financial systems

Trust Fund Guide Cover

U. S. Government

Standard General Ledger Board

3700 East West Highway, Room 213

Hyattsville, Maryland 20782

Phone: 202-874-9980

Fax: 202-874-7232

June 29, 2001

To: Heads of Agencies, Other Users, Preparers, and Auditors of Federal Financial Information

The U.S. Standard General Ledger Board (USSGL Board) is pleased to issue the Federal Trust Fund Accounting Guide.

The scenarios contained within record financial activities of Federal trust funds across the federal government. This

release updates the "final draft" guide that was released December 12, 2000, and incorporates comments that were

received. This final guide includes all USSGL accounts approved by the USSGL Board through the March 8, 2001

Board meeting.

The Federal Trust Fund Accounting Guide (Guide) is intended for use by all Federal agencies that maintain trust fund

accounts established on the books of the Department of Treasury, Financial Management Service (FMS), and are

subject to Treasury, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

(FASAB) guidance. It is a compilation of scenarios that have been developed and approved by the USSGL Board as

issues were presented to the USSGL staff. It follows current Treasury, OMB, and FASAB guidance. Please note that

this Guide will continue to be updated with additional scenarios as issues are presented to and resolved by the USSGL

Board.

The entire Guide is available for download on the USSGL website

(www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/ussgl//tfguide.htm). In addition to the introduction and eight (8) individual

scenarios, we have included, for your convenience, all of the color cover sheets to be inserted in the Guide. Also

included are four (4) color flowcharts depicting the basic framework or flows of the activity being illustrated. Please

insert the pages as instructed on the website. The files may be printed to a color or black and white printer. Printing the

cover sheets and flowcharts on white coated heavy stock paper is recommended. We also recommend purchasing a 1-

1/4" 3-ring binder with front pocket.

Judy Yuran

Chairman
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2





                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Ingles Markets, Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending September 28, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Brenda S. Tudor, Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.







/s/  Brenda S. Tudor
----------------------------------------------
Brenda S. Tudor
Vice President-Finance
and Chief Financial Officer
December 9, 2002
crc_ex411-31dec07.htm


    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    Exhibit
4-11

    


    Office
lease agreement between Sabo Bros. and KCP dated August 9, 2007.

    


    Please
see attached PDF document filed with this filing as an exhibit.
Exhibit 32.2


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF
                CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I,  Ernest  J.  Mrozek,  the  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  The
ServiceMaster  Company,  certify that (i) the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2005,  fully complies with  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information
contained  in such Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                                    /S/ ERNEST J. MROZEK
                                    -----------------------
                                    Ernest J. Mrozek
                                    President and Chief Financial Officer
                                    May 10, 2005


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster  Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.












                                       26
<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          21,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                       346
<INVENTORY>                                      2,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                58,692
<PP&E>                                           4,955
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,366
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,298
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,149
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            17
<OTHER-SE>                                      61,092
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,298
<SALES>                                         14,784
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,784
<CGS>                                            7,247
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,776
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,647)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,345)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        44
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,389)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,389)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.45)


</TABLE>
No. 49613.

#### Protests 65291-K (A), etc., of E. W. J. Hearty, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue and the merchandise are the same as those involved in *United States*v. *Hearty*(31 C. C. P. A. 106, C. A. D. 257), the claim that the merchandise should have been assessed on the weight' of the meat alone was sustained.
Exhibit 21


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES
                                       OF
                      FURNITURE BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC.


       Name of Subsidiary                         Jurisdiction of Incorporation
       ------------------                         -----------------------------

Action Transport, Inc.                                        Delaware
Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc.                           North Carolina
Broyhill Transport, Inc.                                      North Carolina
Cebu Agency Limited                                           Hong Kong
Classic Design Furnishings, Inc.                              Virginia
Decorative Hardware Solutions Ltd.                            Vanuatu
Design Agency Limited                                         Hong Kong
D-H Retail Space, Inc.                                        Delaware
Drexel Heritage Furniture Industries, Inc.                    Delaware
Fayette Enterprises, Inc.                                     Mississippi
Furniture Brands Export Co., Ltd.                             Barbados
HDM Furniture Industries, Inc.                                Delaware
Henredon Furniture Industries, Inc.                           Delaware
Henredon Transportation Company                               North Carolina
Henredon Designer Showrooms, Inc.                             Delaware
Lane Furniture Industries, Inc.                               Mississippi
Laneventure, Inc.                                             Delaware
Maitland-Smith Asia Holdings Limited                          Vanuatu
Maitland-Smith Cebu, Inc.                                     Philippines
Maitland-Smith Furniture Industries, Inc.                     Delaware
Maitland-Smith Home Furnishings, Inc.                         Delaware
Maitland-Smith Limited                                        Hong Kong
P.T. Maitland-Smith                                           Indonesia
Perabut Bermutu (L) Bhd.                                      Malaysia
The Lane Company, Incorporated                                Virginia
Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.                        Delaware
Thomasville Home Furnishings, Inc.                            Delaware


     Lane Furniture Industries, Inc. also does business as Laneventure.

     Thomasville Furniture Industries,  Inc. also does business as Hickory Chair
Company,  The Pearson  Company,  Hickory  Business  Furniture,  Highland  House,
Founders and Creative Interiors.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 PATTY L. SCHUMACHER, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, : 

:

 v. :

:

SOUDERTON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT, : NO. 02-4477

et al., :

:

Defendants. :

:

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of November, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that

the above-captioned matter is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Carol Wells for a

Report and Recommendation limited in scope to the following issues:

1. Whether accurate salary adjustments were forwarded to the Pennsylvania

Public School Education Retirement System (“PSERS”); and 

2. Whether salary and service adjustment forms forwarded to PSERS

reflected true and accurate dates and times of submission.

BY THE COURT:

 

JAMES T. GILES, C.J. 

copies by FAX on

to

Case 2:02-cv-04477-JG Document 10 Filed 11/27/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

v. :

: No. 05-cr-398

EDWARD ROSS :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of August 2024, upon consideration of Petitioner’s Motion for 

Equitable Relief, and/or Relief from Judgment (ECF No. 136), the Government’s Response in 

Opposition (ECF No. 138), and Petitioner’s Reply (ECF Nos. 140, 141), it is hereby ORDERED 

that:

1. Petitioner’s Motion (ECF No. 136) is DENIED.

2. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because Petitioner has not made a 

credible showing that this Court’s procedural ruling was incorrect or a substantial showing 

of a deprivation of constitutional rights.

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Chad F. Kenney 

CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE

Case 2:05-cr-00398-CFK Document 145 Filed 08/14/24 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1781

In re: DAVID CAIN, JR.,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (7:21-cv-00338-TTC-RSB)

Submitted: September 22, 2022 Decided: September 26, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Cain, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1781 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

David Cain, Jr., petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has 

unduly delayed in acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals 

that the district court denied Cain’s § 2241 petition shortly after he filed this mandamus 

petition. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Cain’s case, we deny 

the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1781 Doc: 9 Filed: 09/26/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I,
Steven  J. Cohen, President of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)           The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.


Dated:  November
      14, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Steven
      J. CohenSteven
      J. CohenPresident(Principal
      Executive Officer)
Page 1 of 6 

Inspection Alert! 

Twin Commander Aircraft LLC 

December 2, 2009 

Models Affected: 685, 690, 690A and 690B 

Reason for Publication: To provide input to the FAA in response to the 

Airworthiness Concern Sheet of November 27, 2009 

Subject: Inspection of the 310704-1 and -2 Picture Window Upper Frame Channel, 

the 310384-125 and -65 Left. And Right Hand Wing Main Spar Frame 

Support Channels and the 310704-159 Aft Pressure Bulkhead Web 

Inspection Instructions: 

1. Remove interior components as necessary to gain access to the upper picture 

window frame channels and the aft pressure bulkhead at fuselage station 178.81. 

2. Remove insulation and sound proofing materials for access to structure. 

3. Remove the 310736-120 Doors for access to the upper picture window frame 

channels. 

4. Remove the 310736-143, -144, -85, -86, -113 and -114 Inner Skins for access to 

the upper picture window frame channels and the left hand and right hand main 

spar frame support channels. 

Note: It is acceptable to only remove a sufficient number of fasteners as to allow for 

careful repositioning of the inner skins clear of the inspection areas. 

5. Carefully remove all sealant using non metallic tools and/or commercially 

available sealant removal solvents from the areas to be inspected. (Ref: Figure 1, 

2, 3 and 4 for Inspection Area Detail) 

6. Inspect the areas illustrated in Figures 1 through 4 for cracks, corrosion and any 

other damage. 

7. If damage is found, contact Geoffrey Pence at Twin Commander LLC for further 

inspection instructions. 
Page 2 of 6 

8. Report findings to: 

Twin Commander Aircraft LLC 

18933 59th Avenue N.E. Suite 115 

Arlington, WA 98223 

Attn. Geoffrey Pence 

Technical Service Manager 

(360) 435-9797 X221 

gpence@twincommander.com

Vince Massey 

Aerospace Engineer 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office 

Department ANM-130S 

1601 Lind Ave. S.W. 

Renton, WA 98057-3356 

(425) 917-6475 

Vince.massey@faa.gov

Please provide in your report the aircraft serial number, total airframe time and 

airframe time since a lower wing spar cap replacement if applicable. 

Figure 1 

Right Hand Side Shown With Window Channel Removed 

310704-2 Picture Window Upper Channel Location 

310384-125 Channel and 310412-24 Shear Clip 
Page 3 of 6 

Figure 2 
Page 4 of 6 

Figure 3 
Page 5 of 6 

Figure 4 
Page 6 of 6
March 25, 1948

No. 52241.

Suit 4566.

#### United States *v.*California Milk Producers Assn. et al.

Abstract 51352 reversed January 27, 1948. C. A. D. 382.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

h1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147619-21

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147619-21

COA: 314071; 314239; 315493

Kalamazoo CC: 2011-001144-FH

MORRIS LORENZO THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 23, 2013 orders 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,743
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  256,362
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,920
<INVENTORY>                                      9,972
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               287,027
<PP&E>                                         887,605
<DEPRECIATION>                                 190,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,251,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          196,491
<BONDS>                                        684,890
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,251,721
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               292,372
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,247
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                29,486
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,871
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,907
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,907
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        2
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        2
        

</TABLE>
#### SPECTRUM SCIENCES & SOFTWARE, INC., Appellant, v. Lawrence J. DELANEY, Acting Secretary of the Air Force, Appellee.

No. 00-1259.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 3, 2001.

Before MICHEL, LOURIE, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

*Judgment*

PER CURIAM.

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. *See*Fed. Cir. R. 36.
----

Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 June 2006 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-110/05) (1)

(Avian influenza - Exceptional support measures in the egg sector - Absence of exceptional support measures in the poultrymeat sector - Action for annulment - Inadmissible)

(2006/C 224/95)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Aiello, acting as Agent)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga and L. Visaggio, acting as Agents)

Re:

Annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2102/2004 of 9 December 2004 on certain exceptional market support measures for eggs in Italy (OJ 2004 L 365, p. 10), in so far as it fails to provide exceptional market support measures in the poultrymeat sector in accordance with Article 14 of Regulation (EEC) No 2777/75 of the Council of 29 October 1975 on the common organisation of the market in poultrymeat (OJ 1975 L 282, p. 77).

Operative part of the order

----

(1)OJ C 115 of 14. 5.2005.

----