alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Bulletin No. 2017-07

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to USSGL Supplement Bulletin No. 2017-06, U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL)

- A Treasury Financial Manual (TFM) Supplement

1. Purpose-This TFM bulletin notifies agencies that Part 1 and Part 2 of the USSGL Supplement has

been revised for Fiscal Year (FY) 2017 and FY 2018.

2. Summary of Changes-The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. The

summary header "Consolidated" refers to all changes to date for FY 2017 and FY 2018.

3. Changes by Part/Section/File

Part 1-FY 2017 Reporting changes to files in Sections III, IV, V, and VII:

Section III: Account Transactions

Transaction Listing

Transactions

T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

USSGL Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2017 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources & Schedule P

Budget Program and Financing Schedule

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2017 Reporting

Validation Detail

Edit Summary

Edit Detail

Page 1 of 2
Part 2-FY 2018 Reporting changes to files in Sections III, IV, V, and VII:

Section III: Account Transactions

Transaction Listing

Transactions

T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

USSGL Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2018 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources & Schedule P

Budget Program and Financing Schedule

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2018 Reporting

Validation Detail

Edit Summary

Edit Detail

4. Effective Date

Part 1, requirements for FY 2017, are effective immediately

Part 2, requirements for FY 2018, are effective October 1, 2017

5. Inquiries

Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Jaime M. Saling

Director, USSGL Advisory Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Telephone: 304-480-6485

Fax: 304-480-5176

Date: August 3, 2017

Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Firearms commerce in the UnitedStates [electronic resource].**
 
2001-02 | 2011
 
SuDoc Number:T 70.24: | J 38.19:
Item Number:0971-B-04 (online) | 0718-H-09(online)
CGP systemNumber:000557756
 
February 10, 2020
**Reappropriations - Budgetary Resources Transferred Out Due to a Reappropriation**

**Effective Fiscal 2010**

**Reappropriations - Budgetary Resources Transferred Out Due to a Reappropriation**

**EFFECTIVE FISCAL YEAR 2010**

**PREPARED BY:**

**UNITED STATES STANDARD GENERAL LEDGER ADVISORY DIVISION**

**GOVERNMENTWIDE ACCOUNTING**

**BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE**

**U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY**

**Background**

In Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-11, a reappropriation is defined as an extension of the availability of unobligated balances of budget authority that have *expired*  or would otherwise expire as a result of legislation enacted subsequent to the law that provided the budget authority.  The term does not apply to extensions of the availability of unobligated balances that result from standing provisions of law, enacted before the budget authority was provided, or from provisions of law included in the same law that appropriated the funds.

Reappropriations of expired balances that are newly available for obligation in the current or budget year will be recorded as new budget authority (reappropriations) in the year they are newly available.

Reappropriations of unexpired balances or reappropriations of expired balances that cannot take effect until a fiscal year beyond the budget year will be reported as balance transfers in the year they are newly available for obligation.

Agencies initiate a nonexpenditure transfer in the on-line Governmentwide Accounting (GWA) System NET Application, in addition to indicating the specific transfer type (that is, Reappropriation), they  are also required to select the appropriate budgetary USSGL account applicable to each transaction.This activity is accomplished via SF 1151: Nonexpenditure Transfer Authorization. Refer to OMB Circular A-11, Appendix F pages 49-64 for further guidance on reappropriations.

**Listing of USSGL Accounts Used in This Scenario**

*For Account Definitions please refer to the TFM Section II.****

**USSGL Scenario**

**Assumptions**

1. Activity in this scenario occurs between expired TAFS A and unexpired TAFS B.

2. The BEA Category for TAFS A and TAFS B is discretionary.

3. Both TAFSs are annual year.

**Illustrative Transactions**

# Closing Entries

Note: The FMS 2108 report will no longer be in GTAS for FY 2015 reporting.

� OMB Circular No. A-11 ( 2014), Sections 20 and 120.66

� OMB Circular No. A-11 (2014), Section 20

� OMB Circular No. A-11 (2014), Section 20

3Note:  USSGL TFM S2-14-01  Part 1  has two separate crosswalks for simplicity; we combined the SF 133 and P&F.

PAGE  

15 of 15

**Revised from June 3, 2010**

**September 9, 2014**
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1623 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1623

  To increase the maximum penalty for unfair and deceptive practices 
      relating to advertising of the costs of air transportation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2017

 Mr. Menendez introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To increase the maximum penalty for unfair and deceptive practices 
      relating to advertising of the costs of air transportation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Real Transparency in Airfares Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. INCREASED PENALTIES FOR UNFAIR AND DECEPTIVE AIRFARE 
              ADVERTISING PRACTICES.

    Section 46301(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(7) Penalty for Violations of Unfair and Deceptive Airfare 
Advertising Practices.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), the maximum 
civil penalty assessed on a person for an unfair or deceptive practice 
in violation of section 41712 and described in section 399.84 of title 
14, Code of Federal Regulations (or any corresponding similar 
regulation or ruling), shall be--
            ``(A) $55,000; or
            ``(B) if the person is an individual or small business 
        concern, $2,500.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 54606.

#### Joseph Blank *v.*United States,

protests 130551-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 02-cv-4421

:

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ, :

:

Defendants. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, to wit this _______ day of __________, 2005, upon consideration of

the Defendants’ Motion In Limine to Exclude Improper Documentary Evidence and any

response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that the said Motion is

GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

J.

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 50-3 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 1
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL HUNT,

NO. CIV. S-04-435 LKK/JFM P

Plaintiff,

v. O R D E R

COREY McKAY, et al., 

Defendants.

 /

In light of the court’s March 27, 2006 order, defendant’s June

15, 2005 motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

DATED: March 28, 2006.

/s/Lawrence K. Karlton 

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:04-cv-00435-LKK -JFM Document 47 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50987

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSEPH MICHAEL MCFARLAND, also known as Joseph “Joey” Michael 

McFarland,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:15-CR-68-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Joseph Michael 

McFarland has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). McFarland has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50987 Document: 00514121687 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
No. 16-50987

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50987 Document: 00514121687 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
ACCORD AND SATISFACTION

This Accord and Satisfaction (the "Agreement") is entered into on the __ day of
September, 2006 by and between William D. Dunlavy ("Will") and Park City Group,
Inc. ("PCG").

                                    RECITALS

Whereas, Will has an employment agreement (the Employment Agreement") with
Cooper Fields, LLC dated July 1, 1999; and

Whereas, PCG is the successor in interest to Cooper Fields, LLC and its
business, operations and obligations; and

Whereas, Will acknowledges that any obligations of Cooper Fields, LLC that may
or may not continue as of the date hereof are the obligations of PCG and any
satisfaction by PCG shall work as a satisfaction on behalf of Cooper Fields LLC.

                                    AGREEMENT

Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions contained
herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:

1. PCG hereby grants to Will a Common Stock Purchase Warrant to purchase up to
80,000 shares of common stock of PCG. The terms of the warrant are set forth in
the form of warrant attached hereto as Exhibit A, the original executed copy of
which shall be delivered to Will concurrent with the execution of the Agreement.

2. Will hereby releases and forever discharges and by these presents does, for
himself, his heirs, executors, administrators and successors, remise, release
acquit, satisfy and forever discharge PCG, its subsidiaries, affiliates and
officers and directors, of and from all, and all manner of action and actions,
cause and causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts,
covenants and contracts, promises, claims and demands whatsoever in law or in
equity arising out of the Employment Agreement which he ever had, now has or
which his heirs, executors or administrators, hereafter can, shall or may have,
for upon or by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever from the
beginning of the world to the day of the date of this Agreement.

3. Nothing contained herein shall effect the terms and conditions of Will's
employment with PCG as it currently exists other than whatever effect the
Employment Agreement had.

In witness whereof, the parties hereto have caused this Accord and Satisfaction
to be executed as of the date first above written.


Park City Group, Inc.

-----------------------------                       ----------------------------
William D. Dunlavy
### Thermal evolution of sedimentary basins in Alaska

By: D. G. Howell

Edited by: Mark J. Johnsson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b2142

#### Links

- More information:  **National Geologic Map Database Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plate:  **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1586 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1586

  To require the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere to update 
   periodically the environmental sensitivity index products of the 
 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for each coastal area 
              of the Great Lakes, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2017

 Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Young) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere to update 
   periodically the environmental sensitivity index products of the 
 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for each coastal area 
              of the Great Lakes, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UPDATE TO ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX PRODUCTS OF 
              NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION FOR GREAT 
              LAKES.

    (a) Update Required.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act and not less frequently than once every 7 years 
thereafter, the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere shall update 
the environmental sensitivity index products of the National Oceanic 
and Atmospheric Administration for each coastal area of the Great 
Lakes.
    (b) Environmental Sensitivity Index Product Defined.--In this 
subsection, the term ``environmental sensitivity index product'' means 
a map or similar tool that is utilized to identify sensitive shoreline, 
coastal or offshore, resources prior to an oil spill event in order to 
set baseline priorities for protection and plan cleanup strategies, 
typically including information relating to shoreline type, biological 
resources, and human use resources.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
        the Under Secretary $7,500,000 to carry out this section.
            (2) Availability.--Amounts appropriated or otherwise made 
        available pursuant to paragraph (1) shall be available to the 
        Under Secretary for the purposes set forth in such paragraph 
        until expended.
                                 <all>
```
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
RASHARD BENNETT, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1070 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed February 2, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; J. Kevin Abdoney, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Timothy J. Ferreri, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. CRENSHAW, MORRIS, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
Part 2, Section V: USSGL Crosswalks to Standard 

External Reports

This section includes crosswalks for use in Fiscal Year 2023 GTAS Reporting. These crosswalks map 

USSGL accounts to external reports in accordance with current reporting guidance from the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB), and the 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service).

Each report crosswalk lists the proper USSGL accounts and applicable attributes for each line and/or 

column on the reports. Attributes identify information subsidiary to the basic 6-digit USSGL accounts. This 

subsidiary information is necessary to meet external reporting requirements. See Section IV for additional 

information on attributes.

All crosswalks require pre-closing USSGL account balances.

The following are crosswalks from the USSGL Chart of Accounts to standard external reports required by 

OMB and Fiscal Service:

Section V Page Number

Balance Sheet (BS) V BS - 1

Statement of Net Cost (SNC) V SNC - 1

Statement of Changes in Net Position (SCNP) V SCNP - 1

Statement of Custodial Activity (SCA) V SCA - 1

Statement of Budgetary Resources (SBR) V SBR - 1

SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution 

and Budgetary Resources and Budget Program and 

Financing Schedule

V SF 133/Sch P - 1

Page 1 of 1
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1300 

To prohibit the indefinite detention of persons by the United States, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2017 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the indefinite detention of persons by the United 

States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sixth Amendment 

5 Preservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE INDEFINITE DETENTION OF 

7 PERSONS BY THE UNITED STATES. 

8 (a) LIMITATION ON DETENTION.—Section 4001 of 

9 title 18, United States Code, is amended— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1300 IS

1 (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(a) No person shall be imprisoned or otherwise de4 tained by the United States except consistent with the 

5 Constitution.’’; 

6 (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub7 section (c); and 

8 (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(b)(1) A general authorization to use military force, 

11 a declaration of war, or any similar authority, on its own, 

12 shall not be construed to authorize the imprisonment or 

13 detention without charge or trial of a person apprehended 

14 in the United States. 

15 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) applies to an authorization to use 

16 military force, a declaration of war, or any similar author17 ity enacted before, on, or after the date of the enactment 

18 of the Sixth Amendment Preservation Act. 

19 ‘‘(3) This section shall not be construed to authorize 

20 the imprisonment or detention of any person who is appre21 hended in the United States.’’. 

22 (b) REPEAL OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES

23 OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS

24 PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILI25 TARY FORCE.—Section 1021 of the National Defense AuVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:04 Jun 10, 2017 Jkt 069000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1300.IS S1300

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1300 IS

1 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 

2 81; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is repealed. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2


                      Park City Group, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                            Certification Pursuant To
                 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In connection with the annual Report of Park City Group, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB/A No. 2 for the year ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Dunlavy, Principal Financial Officer, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: September 13, 2006


/s/ William Dunlavy
--------------------------------
Principal Financial Officer, CFO


                  (REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 Written Statement of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Mel RhinelanderMel RhinelanderChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 10, 2005
   
 /s/ Richard L. BertrandRichard L. BertrandSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerNovember 10, 2005
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 55-7 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 1

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 55 Att. 6

Dockets.Justia.com