alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
117 STAT. 856 PUBLIC LAW 108–55—JULY 14, 2003

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1609:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 149 (2003):

May 6, 7, considered and passed House.

June 25, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 108–55

108th Congress

An Act

To redesignate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201

West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, as the ‘‘Admiral Donald Davis Post

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

201 West Boston Street in Brookfield, Missouri, and known as

the Brookfield Main Office, shall be known and designated as

the ‘‘Admiral Donald Davis Post Office Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Admiral

Donald Davis Post Office Building’’.

Approved July 14, 2003.

July 14, 2003

[H.R. 1609]
P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that th i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e li m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 41030 Su m m ar y Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t if f
- A pp el l ee v. M I CH AEL T. GRU BER T D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e S ou t h ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 6 : 0 8 - CR- 7 - ALL B ef ore SM ITH , ST E W A R T an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IAM: * M i c hae lT. G r ube r tpl e ad e d g uil t y t o po s s e s s i o n o f c hil d p o r no gr ap hy and w as sentenced to a 90 - m on t h t e rm of i m pri sonm en tan d to a 10 - year peri od of supervi s e dr e l e a s e . As as p e c i a lc o nd i t i o n o f h i s s up e rv i s i o n, Gr ub e r twas o r de r e d t o “ pa r t i c i pa t e i n am e nt alhe al t h p rogram a s de e m e d ne c e s s ary and a p p rov edbythe pr ob a ti on off i cer.” United States Court of App eals Fifth Circuit 

### F I LE D Jul y 28, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 08- 41030

2 G r ube r t ar gue s t hat t he di s t r i c tc o ur tc o m m i t t e d p l ai n e r r o rb y de l e ga t i ng t o the pr obat i on o f

f i cer th e aut hor i t y t o de c i de w het herhe s houl d underg o m ent alhealt h t r eat m ent . Ci t i ng Un i t ed S t ate s v. A l bro , 32 F . 3 d17 3 , 17 4 ( 5 th C ir . 1 9 9 4 ), h e a r g u e s th a t th e d is tr ic t co u r t im p e r m is s ib lyd e le g a te dits A r tic le II I pow er t o i m pose cond i t i on s of su p e rv ise d rel ease by givi n g t h e probati on off i cer d i scre ti on to de ci d e w h eth er h e sh ou l dpa rticip a te i n a m en tal he a l th p r o g r a m . To s ho w pl ai n e r r o r , G r ube r tm us ts ho w an e r r o rt hati s c l e aro ro bv i o us a n dth a t a ffe c ts h is s u b s ta n tia l rig h ts . Un i t ed S t ate s v. B ak er , 538 F. 3d 324, 332 (5 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ), cer t . den i ed , 1 2 9 S . C t. 9 6 2 (2 0 0 9 ). O u rp r e c e d e n ts d o n o t p la in ly r e q u ir e th e re s u lt G r u b e ru r g e s . S ee Uni t e d S t at e sv. Vega , 332 F. 3d 849, 851- 54 (5 th C ir. 2 0 0 3 ); Un i t ed S t ate s v. W ard en , 2 9 1 F .3d3 6 3 , 3 6 5 -6 6 (5 th C ir. 2 0 0 2 ). T h e j u dg m en ti s A F F IR M E D .
1-WA/2787357.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, 

LLC, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

 v. 

ACE SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE 

COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants. 

Civil Action No. 05-6020 (PBT) 

 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL 

 TO THE CLERK AND ALL PARTIES: 

 Please withdraw the appearance of Harvey Bartle, IV of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 

on behalf of Plaintiffs Blackwater Security Consulting, LLC and Blackwater Lodge and Training 

Center, Inc.. Plaintiffs will continue to be represented by other counsel from Morgan, Lewis & 

Bockius LLP who have appeared in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

 _______________________________ 

Dated: July 6, 2007 Harvey Bartle, IV 

 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 

 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW 

 Washington, D.C. 20004 

 202.739.3000 

 202.739.3001 (facsimile) 

s/ Harvey Bartle, IV 

Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 49 Filed 07/06/2007 Page 1 of 1

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 49

Dockets.Justia.com
(Reap. Dec. 10039)

#### James G. Wiley, a/c Household Mfg. Co. *v.*United States

Entry No. 31027.

(Decided June 28, 1961)

*Stein, & Shostak*for the plaintiff.

*William H. Orrick, Jr.,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

JOHNSON, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been'submitted upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties: , . ..

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED' by and ' between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement enumerated on the attached Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of egg beaters, peelers, and knife blades exported from Japan.

> It is further stipulated and agreed that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale t'O' all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit values, ex factory, and that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise at the time of. exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal for re-appraisement may be deemed submitted for decision' on this stipulation. ..

Ón the agreed facts, I find that export value.,, as that "value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the *407Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that such values are the invoiced unit values, ex-factory.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23
                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-53385) pertaining to the Corus Bankshares, Inc. Commission Program
for Commercial Loan Officers, of our report dated January 16, 2004, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Corus Bankshares, Inc. incorporated
by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31,
2003.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-77481) pertaining to the Corus Bankshares, Inc. 1999 Stock
Option Plan, of our report dated January 16, 2004, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Corus Bankshares, Inc. incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended December 31,
2003.


                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Chicago, Illinois
March 18, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000049573
<NAME> WHITMAN CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          76,800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  396,900<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,300
<INVENTORY>                                    307,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               855,000
<PP&E>                                       1,445,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                 710,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,409,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          526,000
<BONDS>                                        837,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       456,300
<OTHER-SE>                                     185,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,409,400
<SALES>                                      3,111,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,111,300
<CGS>                                        2,008,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,744,700<F2>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                25,600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              65,300<F3>
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                275,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                   117,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            139,400<F4>
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   139,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.31
<FN>
<F1>Net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,300.
<F2>Includes Selling, General and Administrative Expenses, Amortization
Expense and Cost of Goods Sold.
<F3>Interest expense is offset by $6,900 of interest income, therefore
gross interest expense equals $72,200.
<F4>Income from continuing operations is reported after minority interest
of $19,100.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4737 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RAMONA ERAZO, : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff :

: NO. 02-CV-4438

 vs. :

:

TRANS UNION, LLC, et al, :

Defendants :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2002, it is ORDERED that a PRETRIAL

CONFERENCE shall be held on November 21, 2002, at 11:00 a. m. in Room 4006, United

States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

BY THE COURT:

 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04438-TJS Document 12 Filed 10/01/2002 Page 1 of 1
##### 



EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-53385)
pertaining to the Corus Bankshares, Inc. Commission Program for Commercial Loan Officers, of our
reports dated February 25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Corus
Bankshares, Inc., Corus Bankshares, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting of Corus Bankshares, Inc., incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2004. We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-77481) pertaining to the Corus Bankshares, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan, of our reports dated
February 25, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Corus Bankshares, Inc.,
Corus Bankshares, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Corus
Bankshares, Inc., incorporated by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2004. /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP Chicago, Illinois
March 7, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                       9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-30-1999   
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1999   
<CASH>                                   2,680,800
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                     962,111
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>             13,082,461
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             0
<LOANS>                                 50,172,456
<ALLOWANCE>                              1,243,899
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          67,908,170
<DEPOSITS>                              58,816,208
<SHORT-TERM>                             2,385,484
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        332,290
<LONG-TERM>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                 6,333,780
<OTHER-SE>                               2,758,182
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<INTEREST-LOAN>                          2,147,746 
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          387,517 
<INTEREST-OTHER>                            53,705 
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                         2,588,968 
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                       1,169,424 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       1,262,871 
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                    1,326,097 
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                4,000 
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               0 
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                          1,337,082 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            108,683 
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 108,683 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0       
<NET-INCOME>                                23,183
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   0        
<LOANS-NON>                                      0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    0
<RECOVERIES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0
                                        


</TABLE>
No. 56370.

petition 6843-R (Tampa).

#### M. J. Hulsey *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the petitioner had nothing to do with the making of the entry, which was filed by a broker engaged by the shipper. At the time of trial, said broker was out of business and could not be located. An investigation conducted by the Treasury Department disclosed that there was no intent on the part of the petitioner to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 38 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 2

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 38

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 38 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
No. 60797.

#### Merchants Importing, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 277185-K, etc. (New York).

*516Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letters “B” and “C” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUSANNE LINN, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, et al. : NO. 02-4417

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of June, 2003, it is hereby

ORDERED that the settlement conference scheduled in this matter

for Tuesday, July 15, 2003 has been rescheduled to Monday, August

18, 2003 at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall deliver the 

Settlement Conference Summary to chambers on or before August 4,

2003.

BY THE COURT:

 

DIANE M. WELSH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies faxed on 6/20/03 to:

Anne P. Felker, Esq.

Jordan Yeager,Esq.

Robert L. Sharpe, Jr., Esq.

David J. MacMain, Esq.

Amy L. Rosenberger, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 22 Filed 06/20/2003 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018408EN.01004701.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2018 — Sweden v Commission

(Case T-260/16) (1)

((EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Decoupled direct aids - On-the-spot checks - Remote sensing - Assessment of risk factors - Corrective action to be taken by the Member State concerned - Assessment of the financial loss - Proportionality))

(2018/C 408/59)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: initially, L. Swedenborg, A. Falk, N. Otte Widgren, C. Meyer-Seitz and U. Persson, and subsequently L. Swedenborg, A. Falk and C. Meyer-Seitz, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and K. Simonsson, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek and J. Vláčil, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking, primarily, annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/417 of 17 Μarch 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2016 L 75, p. 16), in so far as it concerns decoupled direct aids paid to the Kingdom of Sweden totalling EUR 8 811 286,44 for the claim year 2013 and, in the alternative, the reduction of the amount of those decoupled direct aids excluded from financing in the amount of EUR 1 022 259,46.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/417 of 17 Μarch 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it concerns decoupled direct aids paid to the Kingdom of Sweden totalling EUR 8 811 286,44 for the claim year 2013; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/417 of 17 Μarch 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it concerns decoupled direct aids paid to the Kingdom of Sweden totalling EUR 8 811 286,44 for the claim year 2013;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Kingdom of Sweden; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Kingdom of Sweden;

| 3. | Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.

---
(Part 1SUPPLEMENT) (Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection III) (U.S. Standard General LedgerAccount Transaction Postings)

 (R = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Reverse’ in the Comment. AP = The USSGL transaction mentions ‘Also Post’ in the Comment.) (Bulletin No. 2021-20) (III AP - 10) (August 2021)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                       TERAYON COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the periodic report of Terayon Communication Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Edward Lopez,
Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date
hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United
States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

                  (3)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
                        Exchange Act of 1934, and

                  (4)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company at the dates and
                        for the periods indicated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.

Date: November 9, 2004                                /s/ Edward Lopez
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                          Edward Lopez
                                                 Acting Chief Financial Officer