alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Berle M. Schiller 5614 United States Courthouse

 JUDGE Independence Mall West

 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106

 

 267-299-7620

 

VIA FACSIMILE ONLY

September 23, 2003

NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT

Re: Joseph Marino v. Kent Line International

Docket No. 02-CV-4488

Dear Counsel:

Please be advised that Oral Argument regarding Defendants’ motions for summary

judgment in the above-referenced matter has been scheduled by the Honorable Berle M. Schiller

for Wednesday, October 1, 2003 at 2:00 P.M. in Courtroom 5C, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market

Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Very truly yours,

Patricia A. Callahan

(267) 299-7621

Deputy Clerk to

Hon. Berle M. Schiller

Case 2:02-cv-04488-BMS Document 59 Filed 09/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Ingles Markets, Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending
September 26, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert P. Ingle, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/S/    ROBERT P.
INGLE                 
|Robert P. Ingle Chief Executive Officer
|                                       
|December 7, 2009                       



The
foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit of the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of
the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing).
# sec4_attribtable_2020

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2020-10	&"Arial,Bold"&9IV AT - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BMarch 2020
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 83 Att. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
No. 63048.

#### The *Gren*Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/13221 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Case 2:04-cv-00622-FCD-GGH   Document 37    Filed 12/07/05   Page 1 of 1

    -       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2012-07-23T17:57:49-0400
      - US GPO, Washington, DC 20401
      - Superintendent of Documents
      - GPO attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by GPO
exhib10-1.htm


    
      
        

        

      

      Sanders|Ortoli|Vaughn-Flam|Rosenstadt llp

      501 Madison Avenue - 14th
Floor

      New York, NY 10022

      212-588-0022 (main)

      212-829-8937
(direct)

      212-826-9307(fax)

      wsr@sovrlaw.com

      www.sovrlaw.com

    

     

    
 

                                                   July 8, 2008

     

    BY EMAIL AND FIRST CLASS
U.S. MAIL

    Independence
Energy Corporation

    4750
Paton Street

    Vancouver,
BC V6C 2J1

    


    Attn:
Cameron King, Chief Executive Officer

              Email:
cking@endeavorenergy.com

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              Re:

            	
              Termination
      of the share exchange agreement between Independence Energy Corporation
      f/k/a Endeavor Energy Corporation (“Endeavor”) and Atlantic Wine Agencies,
      Inc. (“Atlantic”) dated May 16, 2008 (“Exchange
  Agreement”)

            


    

    


    Dear Mr.
King:

     

    In our
capacity as counsel for Atlantic, we are advising you that as a result of
Endeavor’s failure to provide various material due diligence items to the
satisfaction of Atlantic’s management, including but not limited to audited
financials statements for the period ending December 31, 2007 as well as forms
of opinion as to the title of the various assets owned by Endeavor, Atlantic is
hereby terminating the Exchange Agreement pursuant to Section 9.15
thereof.

    


    The Exchange Agreement is deemed
terminated except for any provision which may survive the termination of the
Exchange Agreement as provided therein. Atlantic strictly reserves the right to
seek and enforce any remedies available to it whether in law or
equity.

    


    Notwithstanding
the above, we wish you the best of luck in your efforts to build Endeavor into a
successful company.

    


                            Very truly
yours,

                                               /s/
William S. Rosenstadt

                                                            William S.
Rosenstadt
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-04165-MAM Document 50 Filed 10/24/07 Page 17 of 17
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 122 

Note 17. Advances from Others and Deferred Revenue 

Advances from Others and Deferred Revenue as of September 30, 2022, and 2021 

(In billions of dollars) 2022 2021 

Security Assistance Accounts ................................................................................. 167.7 125.7 

Department of Energy ............................................................................................ 50.6 48.8 

All other................................................................................................................. 28.9 27.5 

Total advances from others and deferred revenue ................................................. 247.2 202.0 

Advances from others and deferred revenue consists of payments received in advance of performance of activities for 

which revenue has not been earned and other deferred revenue or income received but not yet earned not otherwise classified 

as advances or repayments. Some examples include deferred project revenue funded in advance, funds received in advance 

under the terms of a settlement agreement, prepaid postage, and unearned fees, assessments, and surcharges. 

SAA advances from others represent liabilities for collections received to cover future expenses or acquisition of assets 

and are related to contracts authorizing progress payments based on cost as defined in the Federal Acquisition Regulation. In 

accordance with contract terms, specific rights to the contractors’ work vest when a specific type of contract financing 

payment is made. Due to the probability the contractors will complete their efforts and deliver satisfactory products, and 

because the amount of potential future payments is estimable, the SAA has recognized a contingent liability for estimated 

future payments which are conditional pending delivery and government acceptance. SAA had a large increase in advances 

from others and deferred revenue in FY 2022 due to adjustments to Foreign Military Sales cash collections from systems that 

do not directly feed into Defense Departmental Reporting System, and the funds advanced from State that were previously 

recognized as revenue. 

The DOE’s Nuclear Waste Fund collects revenues from owners or generators of high-level radioactive waste and SNF 

to pay their share of disposal costs. These revenues are recognized as a financing source as costs are incurred, and revenues 

that exceed the expenses are considered deferred revenue.
(Reap. Dec. 8638)

Entry No. 786846-1/2.

#### Andrew Fisher Cycle Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided September 7, 1956)

*Brooks & Brooks*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

By this appeal for reappraisement, plaintiff raises the question of the proper dutiable value of an importation of bicycles from Germany.

The parties hereto have stipulated and agreed that said bicycles were appraised on the basis of statutory cost of production equal to *498$22.04 per bicycle, less American-made cartons, freight to New York, and inland trucking, plus 3 per centum, plus American-made cartons.

It was further agreed that the cost of material and fabrication, manipulation, or other process employed in manufacturing or producing such or similar merchandise, at a time preceding the date of exportation of the involved merchandise which would ordinarily permit the manufacture or production thereof in the usual course of business, plus the usual general expenses (not less than 10 per centum of such cost) in the case of such or similar merchandise, plus the cost of all containers and coverings, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, and plus an addition for profit (not less than 8 per centum of the costs of materials and fabrication or manipulation and general expenses) equal to the profit which ordinarily is added to the cost of merchandise of the same general character by manufacturers or producers in the country of manufacture who are engaged in the manufacture of merchandise of the same class or kind equal $22.04 per bicycle, less freight to New York and inland trucking.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (f)), is the proper basis of value for the bicycles in issue, and that said value is $22.04 per bicycle, less freight to New York and inland trucking.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# Data

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold"VII VSR - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BDecember 2021
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 16 Filed 01/08/2003 Page 1 of 1
' ; c .I , ;• ,"**~**



### - ' ·**~** . . · ·**CI '1?** **-.I tTTEF**  or! 

### :**·~ 1G** **J~!7 ;~l/** **-~~~ ~~=~~-i~:** **;~: ;**  ·= · !nr

..



### The Honorable Ray LaH oo d Sccr c larv Oepartn1cnt of Transportati o n 1200 New Jcr s ev A venue. 

### SE W a shington. D.C. 

### 20590 De a r Secretary LaHood :**VV!~SH NGTO** **i'J ,**  iJ C 205 10 24W



### .June 6. 201 2

I 

### am writing today t o express 

### my support for the Tupelo Airport Authority's application to the Department ofTran sportation's Smn11 Community Air Service Development Program. c Qi;J r · .t : T rr:r: cr. , RULES r\f-.! 0

. ADf.;jt\ij STR t, T:Oh:



### Air service improvements are important to 

### ec o nomic d e velopment in Northeast Mississippi. A g rant from the Small Community Air Service Development Program will help to 

### enhance Mississippians' awaren e ss of services offered at 

### the Tupel o Regional Airp o rt. I hope that you will g ive full c on s ideration to this application

. Plea se do not he s itate to c o ntact me if I c an be of any further assi s tance.

T C / l\\



### S10-120620-016

### Jun e 5

. 2012

The Honorable 

### Ray LaHo od Sec retary , U.S. Department ofT ransport at i on 

### 400 Seventh Street, 

### SW Washington. D.C. 2 059 0-000 I

Dear Ra y . -,. · • : :( :· ! ' > :l (,I t• <



### I \VOuld 

### like to expres s 

### my support fo r 

### the Tupelo Airport A utho ri ty's application for a Small Community Air Service Development Program Grant Funding from the U.S

. Department of Transportation in the amount of $75,000 will allow t he Authority t o de v elop a new marketing campaign which will promote Silver Airways for Tupelo Regional Airport and e mphasis upcoming changes to air service and cust ome r convenience. ln addition, the Authority will reach out to the community through an aggressive 

### campaign to publicize the 

### value of fl y ing lo ca lly from Tupelo. It is projected th at the proposed efforts will allow the Tupelo Airport Authority to boo st airport performance to the lev el that t hey \vill no longer require an E sse ntial Air Service subsidy. I hope that you will give 

### lhe Tup e lo Airport A u thority's application ever y consideration. 

### S hou ld additio n a l 

### infonnation be 

### required from 

### my office , please contact Bevin 

### Wilkinson of 

### my staff at 

### (228) 6 04 -23 83

. With be s t wishes, I am



### R.FW / BW



### S10-120613-003 r' O i 1:;

..... -:. n: l '**~** ! ','**::~·~ ~**  .. ·. :: • .**(~ I**  t(**~** . : •**~** ') : (! .. ; Si nce relv vours ,

# ~~~

·, ',·. : ., ..**~** . . , _ , : .. . ·
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII &"Arial,Regular" 

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"June 2019
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Tongli
Pharmaceuticals (USA), Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Li Li, principal financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 14, 2012                                                      
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                           
|By:                                                                        
|Name: Li Li                                                                
|Title: Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)










This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed
filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
No. 54004.

#### B. Altman & Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 604227-G (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protest was dismissed.
# sec6_rbalsh_2022

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&10VI RBS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10June 2022
Part 1 Fiscal Year 2017 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section III

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Account Transaction Categories

TRANSACTION

CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION

Bulletin No. 2017-06 III AC - 1 June 2017

A. Funding

100 - 399 Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections

400 - 699 Authority Transfers

700 - 799 Reimbursables and Other Income

B. Disbursements and Payables

100 - 299 Payments/Purchases

300 - 399 Commitments/Undelivered Orders/Expended Authority - Unpaid

400 - 599 Payables/Accrued Liabilities

600 - 699 Advances and Prepayments

C. Collections and Receivables

100 - 399 Receipts

400 - 599 Receivables/Accrued Revenue

600 - 799 Asset Sale and Disposition (Gains and Losses)

D. Adjustments/Writeoffs/Reclassification

100 - 299 Upward and Downward Adjustments

300 - 399 Prior-Period Adjustments

400 - 499 Writeoffs

500 - 799 Reclassification/Revaluation

E. Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections

100 - 399 Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499 Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above

500 - 799 Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

F. Yearend

100 - 299 Preclosing Entries

300 - 499 Closing Entries

G. Memorandum Entries

100 - 299 All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

H. Other Specialized Transaction Entries

100 - 799 Other
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Intrac, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred H. Mermelstein,
President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Fred H. Mermelstein
-------------------------------------
Fred H. Mermelstein
President and Chief Executive Officer

March 28, 2005



         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Intrac, Inc. and will be retained by Intrac, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          29,636
<SECURITIES>                                     2,948
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                       464
<INVENTORY>                                      5,833
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,953
<PP&E>                                           3,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,234
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,150
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,530
<SALES>                                         18,776
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,776
<CGS>                                           22,023
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,023
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (41,743)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (41,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (6.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.39)
        

</TABLE>
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAY LYNN,

Plaintiff, No. CIV S-04-0543 LKK GGH P

vs.

ARGRO, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER

 /

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil

rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. 

The court has determined that this case may be appropriate for appointment of counsel. 

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to

require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist.

Court, 490 U.S. 296, (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, however, the court may

request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v.

Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015 (9th Cir. 1990); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332 (9th Cir. 1990). In

this case the court is not sure whether those exceptional circumstances exist or not. Therefore,

this court will refer this case to the civil rights panel in this district for review. 

\\\\\

Case 2:04-cv-00543-LKK -GGH Document 43 Filed 08/10/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

Plaintiff is cautioned while the case is under review, he has responsibility to

continue to prosecute his action. The court is not staying the litigation pending the review; rather

the review and continued processing of this case will take place at the same time. No scheduled

dates in this litigation have been vacated. Also, it may ultimately turn out that volunteer counsel

may not be procurable for plaintiff's case.

Plaintiff also seeks a court order governing discovery. However, this court

previously issued the discovery order in this matter on April 20, 2005.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order upon the University of

California, King Hall Civil Rights Clinic, and the Civil Rights Clinic is directed to contact the

Clerk’s Office to make arrangements to review the file in this case; and

2. The Civil Rights Clinic shall inform the court of their decision within 30 days

from the date of this order;

3. Plaintiff’s July 18, 2005 request for a discovery order is denied as moot, the

court’s discovery order having been previously filed; and

4. The Clerk of the Court is to re-serve by mail upon plaintiff prisoner pro se the

discovery order filed in this action on April 20, 2005.

DATED: 8/10/05 

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows

 

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

ggh:009

lynn0543.crc

Case 2:04-cv-00543-LKK -GGH Document 43 Filed 08/10/05 Page 2 of 2