alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10981)

#### F. S. Whelan & Sons *v.*United States

Entry No. 12860, etc.

(Decided May 13, 1965)

*Barnes, Riohardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, are before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to approval by the court:

> That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consisted of hardboard imported from Ganada.

> *660That at *the time*of *exportation*of said hardboard such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale or sold for home consumption in Canada or for exportation to the United States; and was likewise not freely offered for sale or sold in the United States; that at the time of exportation of said hardboard the sum of the following, (1) The cost of materials of, and of fabrication, manipulation, or other process employed in manufacturing or producing such or similar merchandise, at a time preceding the date of exportation of the particular merchandise under consideration which would ordinarily permit the manufacture or production of the particular merchandise under consideration in the usual course of business; (2) The usual general expenses in the case of such or similar merchandise; (3) The cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the particular merchandise under consideration in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States; and (4) An addition for profit (not less than 8 per centum of the sum of the amounts found under clauses (1) and (2) just recited) equal to *the*profit which ordinarily is added, in the case of merchandise of the same general character as the particular merchandise under consideration, by manufacturers or producers in the country of manufacture or production who are engaged in the production or manufacture of merchandise of the same class or kind, was the invoice unit value, net, packed.

> That the instant appeals are submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402a (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956,70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values, net, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy. 

# ACTION:

Notice of proposed subsequent arrangement. 

# SUMMARY:

This notice is being issued under the authority of section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2160). The Department is providing notice of a proposed “subsequent arrangement” under the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the United States and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom) and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear Energy between the United States and Canada. 

This subsequent arrangement concerns the retransfer of 51,775.1 kg of Natural UF6 (67.6% U), containing 35,000 kg of Uranium. This material will be retransferred from Cameco Corporation, Canada, to Urenco Ltd., Netherlands for enrichment and return to the United States for use as fuel in nuclear power reactors by STP Nuclear Operating Company, Texas. Urenco Ltd. is authorized to receive nuclear material pursuant to the U.S.-Euratom Agreement for Cooperation. 

In accordance with section 131 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, we have determined that this subsequent arrangement will not be inimical to the common defense and security. 

This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than fifteen days after the date of publication of this notice. 

Dated: February 20, 2007.

For the Department of Energy. 

Anatoli Welihozkiy, 

Acting Director, Office of International Regimes and Agreements.

[FR Doc. E7-3181 Filed 2-23-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
INNOVATIONS INC 

2108 St. George Ave. 

Saskatoon, SK S7M OK7 

Canada 

Phone: 306-955-9907 

Toll Free: 800-979-9794 

Fax: 306-955-9906 

August 6, 2015 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800IndependentAve.SVV 

VVashington D.C 20591 

Ref: Petition for an amendment to grant of exemption# 11281 paragraph 13. 

FAA Docket No. FAA-2014-0963 

To Whom It May Concern, 

As President of Draganfly Innovations Inc we respectfully request consideration for an amendment 

to our 333 exemption (#11281) which would allow for exceptions to the requirement 13 

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport, 

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a 

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver's license issued by a 

state, the District of Colombia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal 

government. The PIC must also meet the flight review requirements specified in 

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate. 

Specifically we are requesting that this exemption allow Benjamin Miller who has extensive 

experience operating Draganflyer multirotor systems (Draganflyer X4P, X4ES, X6, and Guardian) 

since 2008 act as a PIC in the operation of Draganflyer systems in US National Airspace as specified 

in our Exemption and associated COA. 

Benjamin Miller has been operating Draganflyer systems under the jurisdiction and authority of the 

Mesa County Sheriffs Office since 2008. With Ben's continuing demonstration of competence as a 

pilot and in developing a leading Public Safety sUAS Operations Program we are proud to say after 

appropriate testing and demonstration of skills, we have provided him with the designation of 

being a Certified Draganfly Innovations Flight Instructor. 

We believe there is substantial merit to allow an amendment to exemption 11281 paragraph 13. 

Whereby the FAA will allow, Benjamin Joseph Miller, to operate all UAS identified in exemption 

11281 having completed all mandatory flight training required by the MCSO, numerous operational 

missions in command, 12 hours of single engine, manned aircraft, flight training, attainment of 

Flight instructor certification by Draganfly Innovations and holding a driver's license in the state of 

Colorado. 

Draganfly Innovations Inc. www .draganfly .com info@draganfly .com 
INNOVATIO N S INC 

We believe Ben's VAS operations experience during his tenure with the Mesa County Sheriffs Office 

Unmanned Aircraft program creates an equivalent level of knowledge and safety that will allow him 

to operate VAS safely under exemption 11281. 

Your interest in providing public service employees increased opportunities for professional 

development in collaboration with Private Industry is appreciated. 

Respectfully, 

Zenon Dragan 

President 

Draganfly Innovations Inc. www.rctoys.com info@rctoys.com Page 2
# sec5_sbr_2024

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout November 30, 2022
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00420- CV
Richard Cheroske; D avid Pe nny; Bl ue Castle P roperty Managem ent, LLC;

190 Orange Avenue; and Jean Stanzick, App ellants
v. El Pat io, LLC d /b/a E l P atio Mote l, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TO M GREEN CO UNTY, 119 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. B -09 -09 77- C, H ONO RAB LE B EN WO ODW ARD, JUDGE P RESIDING

O R D E R P ER CURIAM

This appea l was stay ed for bankruptc y proce eding s. C o u n s el for appellants has notified this Court that the bankruptc y court g rante d David Penny ’s motion to resume this appea l. Penny filed an amende d unopposed motion for reinstateme nt of this appea l and for partial voluntary dismiss al of the other appellants, Richard Cheroske; Blue Castle Property Manag ement, L L C; 190 Ora ng e Avenue ; and J ean Stanzi ck, who for v arious rea sons no longe r wish to pursue this appeal. 1 We reinstate the appeal , gra n t the motion, and dismiss the appea l as to appellants Richard Cheroske; Blue Castle Property Manag ement, L L C; 1 9 0 O r a n g e Avenue; and J ean Stanzi ck.

Although the rema ining appellants did not join Penny ’s motion, Penny ’s counsel repr esents 1 all appellants in this case and filed the ir notice of a ppeal.See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)
. This appea l will continue under the same cause number and is restyled

as David Pe nny v. E l Patio, L LC d/ b/a El Patio Motel . Penny ’s brief is due on J uly

25, 2014. I t is ordere d on J une 25, 2014.

Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Rose

2
# sec5_custodialact_2021

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCA - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BAugust 2021
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 7, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 99 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-44, CP2024-44.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25256 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
STATE OF FLORIDA, 

DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL 

AFFAIRS, and SHERIFF OF 

SEMINOLE COUNTY, FLORIDA,

Petitioners,

v.

MATHIS & MURPHY, P.A. and 

ALLIED VETERANS 

MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.,

Respondents.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3216

Opinion filed October 16, 2014.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction.

Thomas W. Poulton of DeBevoise & Poulton, P.A., Winter Park, for Petitioner Sheriff 

of Seminole County, Florida; David H Margolis, Orlando; and Jacqueline M. Boswell, 

Miami, for Petitioner State of Florida, Department of Legal Affairs.

Charles P. Pillans, III, and Henry M. Coxe, III, of Bedell, Dittmar, DeVault, Pillans & 

Coxe, Jacksonville, for Respondent Mathis & Murphy, P.A.; Curtis S. Fallgatter of 

Fallgatter & Catlin, P.A., Jacksonville, for Respondent Allied Veterans Management 

Group.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is granted. On remand, the Chief Judge 

of the Fourth Judicial Circuit shall assign a successor judge. 

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
CERTIFICATION OF
                           CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB of Genesis
Realty Group, Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2001, I, Jeffrey Glick,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Realty Group,
Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:

     1.   Such Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
          2001, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the
          year ended December 31, 2001, fairly represents in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Genesis
          Realty Group, Inc.

Dated:    January 10, 2005

Genesis Realty Group, Inc.

By:  /s/ Jeffrey Glick
-----------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10350)

Entry Nos. 20984; 42867; 23105.

#### Radio Corp. of America *v.*United States

(Decided October 10, 1962)

*Sharretts, Raley & Garter*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> *416IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe parties hereto that tbe merchandise which is the subject of the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of phonograph records exported from Mexico between March 18, 1959, and November 9,1959.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that phonograph records are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing reappraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

On tlie agreed facts, I find tbat tbe proper basis for appraisement of the phonograph records in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the prices shown in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEREMY P. PUCKETT, No. 2:04-cv-0604-MCE-PAN-P

Petitioner, 

v. ORDER

D.L. RUNNELS, Warden,

Respondent.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas

corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate

Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 15, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has not filed

objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

Case 2:04-cv-00604-MCE -PAN Document 12 Filed 03/30/06 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 15, 2006, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.

DATED: March 30, 2006

___________________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00604-MCE -PAN Document 12 Filed 03/30/06 Page 2 of 2
Opinion issued November 10, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00934-CV

———————————

IN RE CELIA REAR, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Celia Rear, filed a petition for writ of mandamus on November 3, 

2015, seeking to compel the respondent trial judge to vacate her oral order, made 

during a hearing on February 5, 2015, denying the relator’s plea to the jurisdiction 

and request for the court to decline jurisdiction in the underlying petition to modify
2

the parent-child relationship.1 Relator also filed a motion for emergency stay of 

jury trial on November 3, 2015, seeking a stay of the pretrial conference set for 

November 6, 2015, and the jury trial set for November 16, 2015, pending 

resolution of her petition. On November 3, 2015, the real party in interest, Jason 

Edward Minton, filed a second amended response to relator’s motion.

The Court, having examined and considered the petition and appendix, 

motion, and response, is of the opinion that relator has not established herself 

entitled to the mandamus relief sought. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ 

of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), (d). We dismiss the motion for 

emergency relief as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Huddle, and Lloyd.

 

1

The underlying case is In the Interest of S.A.M., a Child, Cause No. 2005-04747, 

pending in the 311th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Alicia 

Franklin York presiding.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF ODYSSEY HEALTHCARE, INC. PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned officers of Odyssey HealthCare, Inc. (the Company) hereby certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 and filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), that: 1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
Companys financial condition and results of operations. /s/ RICHARD R. BURNHAM
    
    /s/ DOUGLAS B. CANNONRichard R. Burnham
    
    Douglas B. CannonPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    Chief Financial Officer
 Dated: March 14, 2005
No. P68/265.

protest 66/13626 (New York).

#### Amerex Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of nylon tights or leotards similar in all material respects to those subject of *Children’s*Hose, *Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 6, C.D. 2547), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 23.3



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (file numbers 333-41454,  33-50922,  33-61532,  33-66482,
33-80726,  333-33485,  333-65974) of Saucony,  Inc. of our report dated February
26, 2001  relating  to the  financial  statements  and the  financial  statement
schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.




                                    PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
April 3, 2003
No. 52219.

protests 738501-G, etc. (New York).

#### Nat Lewis Retail Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

Chemical Information for new substance 

Reactants:

Reaction (simplified):

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

Reaction (detailed):

[ ]

[ ]
CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

Representative structures 

[ ]
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Rickey G. YOUNG, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-4759.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 2001.

Decided June 18, 2001.

Rickey G. Young, pro se. Rick A. Mountcastle, Office of the United States Attorney, Abingdon, VA, for appellee.

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Rickey G. Young appeals the district court’s orders denying his pretrial motions to represent himself in association with other counsel, to dismiss the indictment due to pre-indictment delay and violation of the statute of limitations, and to discover evidence of selective prosecution. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the orders are not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); *Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,*337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders here appealed are neither final orders nor appeal-*148able interlocutory or collateral orders. We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*DISMISSED.*