alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
.^^^^]LL£^/. PITTSBURGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 

Allegheny County Airport Authority 

Landside Terminal, 4th Floor Mezz. 

P.O. Box 12370 

Pittsburgh, PA 15231-0370 

'^Tj^i'^^ 412-472-3500 

mmfijfPittsburgh^c'w 

May 18, 2010 

Dennis DeVaxiey, Chief 

US Department of Transportation , j 

Office of the Secretary of Transportation |=; 

Essential Air Service Division .==5 

Office of Aviation Analysis --

12oo New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Mr. DeVaney. 

The Allegheny County Airport Authority, managers of Pittsburgh International Airport, 

encovirage the selection of the services fix>m Clarksburg and Morgantown, West 

Virginia to be designated through Kttsburgh International Airport as the chosen use 

for Essential Air Service Funding. 

With Umited federal funding and increased airline operating costs, the Essential Air 

Servfce (EAS) program is under financial pressure. The goal of the EAS Program is to 

develop commercial^'useful, self-supporting air service. One of the goals of the 

Pennsylvania Air Service Committee and Pittsburgh International Airport has been to 

develop a system which will provide smaller communities' single ticket and transfer 

access to multiple carriers - legacy and LCC - with a single screening and baggage 

solution rather than only the single choice connection offered by contract carriers 

through hubs. While EAS acts as a safety net to carriers serving small communities, 

it can also act as a safety net to small and mid-sized airports wiUing to develop a plan 

for an air service solution. A more substantial partnership between airports and 

airlines can be achieved as some of the initial risk for carriers willing to partner in 

pilot programs, intended to reduce dependence of EAS support is mitigated, by the 

EAS safety program itself. Our support is for Gulfstream, a proven carrier that has 

agreed to take on this endeavor with PIT and work with the Pennsylvania Air Service 

Committee under Option 2. 
Dennis DeVaney 

Page Two 

May 18, 2010 

Pittsburgh International Airport supports the goals of carriers wiUing to bring traffic 

back through PIT and will partner with them to build a multi-carrier connection 

network solution. We feel that when the traveling public is given a travel connection 

choice, it wiU result in economic stimulatioti resulting in a natural market growth for 

smaller communities. 

Sincerely, 

Bradley D. Penrod, A.A.E. 

Executive Director/CEO 

BDP/par 

cc: Michael Martin 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Essential Air Service (EAS) 85 Domestic Analysis, X-53
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA


### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT

ROBERT HALGREN

,

Appellant,

v.

CITY OF LARGO and ELIZABETH SPARROW

- HALGREN

,

Appellee s

.

No. 2D 2 023

- 0426

June 14 , 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas M. Ramsberger , Judge.

Benjamin E. Hillard and Amy Cuykendall Jones of Hillard Cuykendall,
P.A., Largo, for Appellant.

Matthew D. Weidner of Weidner Law, P.A., St. Petersburg , for Appellee City of Largo

.

No appearance for Appellee Elizabeth Sparrow

- Halgren.

PER CURIAM

.

Af f irmed.

NORTHCUTT

, SILBERMAN, and ATKINSON , JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior publication.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0029

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

JOSE PERALTA, 

Defendant and Appellant, 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension 

of time, and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time until March 27, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve 

Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 14 2022

02/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0029
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           57,494
<BONDS>                                        180,263
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,133,151
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   313,395
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Change TC D528 Comment section “See USSGL TC D318” to “See USSGL TC-D526”

TC D318 no longer exists.

D528 To record the revaluation of a turned-in broken part from operating materials and supplies held for repair based on 

estimated repair costs. 

Comment: Reverse this entry when the repaired broken part is returned to stock as a serviceable item. See USSGL TC-D526. 

Reference: USSGL implementation guidance; Operating Materials and Supplies 

Budgetary Entry 

None 

Proprietary Entry 

Debit 679000 Other Expenses Not Requiring Budgetary Resources 

 Credit 151900 Operating Materials and Supplies – Allowance

We will continue to review Section III and make necessary updates.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION §

OF DOMINIQUE TISINGER § No. 455, 2016

FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS §

Submitted: September 12, 2016

Decided: November 1, 2016

Before VALIHURA, VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 1st day of November 2016, the Court has considered Dominique Tisinger’s 

petition for a writ of mandamus as well as the State=s answer and motion to dismiss.

Tisinger filed this petition requesting that the Superior Court be directed to rule on his 

motion for judgment of acquittal and motion for evidentiary hearing and appointment 

of counsel. A review of the Superior Court docket in Tisinger’s case reflects that the 

Superior Court denied Johnson’s motion on September 15, 2016. Accordingly, 

Tisinger’s petition for a writ of mandamus is moot. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of 

mandamus is DISMISSED as moot. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

 Justice
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES C. STRINGER, No. CIV S-04-0551-LKK-CMK-P

Petitioner, 

vs. ORDER

MICHAEL HARRISON, et al.,

Respondents.

 /

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with appointed counsel, brings this petition

for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 8, 2004, respondents filed

an answer to petitioner’s petition. Respondents have not, however, lodged the state court record

with the answer, as required by Rule 5 of the Federal Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. 

Respondent is directed to lodge the complete state court record within 30 days of the date of this

order and is cautioned that failure to comply may result in the imposition of sanctions. See

Local Rule 11-110. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: October 11, 2006.

______________________________________

CRAIG M. KELLISON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-00551-LKK -CMK Document 24 Filed 10/12/06 Page 1 of 1
Bulletin No. 2019-06

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Changes to U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury Financial Manual (TFM)

Supplement

1. Purpose—This Bulletin notifies agencies that Part 2 of the USSGL has been revised for Fiscal Year (FY)

2019.

2. Summary of Changes—The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL.

3. Changes by Part/Section/File

Part 2—FY 2019 Reporting changes to files in Sections IV, V, VI, and VII:

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

USSGL Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2019 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

Statement of Budgetary Resources

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources & Schedule P Budget Program

and Financing Schedule

Section VI: Crosswalks to Reclassified Statements for FY 2019 Reporting

Reclassified Balance Sheet

Reclassified Statement of Operations and Changes in Net Position

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2019 Reporting

Validation Detail

Edit Detail

4. Effective Date

Page 1 of 2
Part 2 requirements are effective immediately

5. Inquiries

Direct questions concerning this Bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Jaime M. Saling

Director, Financial Reports and Advisory Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Telephone: 304-480-6485

Fax: 304-480-5176

Date: March 14, 2019

Page 2 of 2
# U.S. Department of Education

**Guaranty Agency**  **Data Provider Instructions OMB COLLECTION**  According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 8 hours per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection is mandatory

under Title IV, Part G of the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965, as amended by

the 1998 Amendments to the HEA required to retain benefits under the HEA. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210

-4537 or email ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1845

-0035

.
EXHIBIT 99.1







        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350
               OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Jonathan P. Ward, the chief executive officer of The  ServiceMaster  Company,
certify that (i) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June
30, 2002,  fully  complies  with  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained in such Form
10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.









                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                    Jonathan P. Ward
                                                     August 13, 2002




                                       25
<PAGE>
DRAFT

ID

Simple or

Special Name Type Description Error Message 

118 SPECIAL

Restricted Use of USSGL Accounts 

113510 and 123500 Compound

The use of USSGL accounts 113510 and 123500 is 

restricted to specific Department of Defense TAS only.

This TAS is not permitted to report USS

113510 and 123500. 

123 SIMPLE

BUDGET OBJECT CLASS Bulk File Special

The Budget Object Class must be valid based on the OMB Circular A-11

The Budget Object Class is not valid. RA-11. 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Summary

Part 2SUPPLEMENT

Bulletin No. 2021-20 DRAFT VII VSR - 1
No. 58494.

petition 6923-R (New York).

#### Malhame & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

From the testimony, it appeared that although the prayer books were imported in a finished condition, the text and the bindings were dutiable separately. According to the testimony of one of the partners of the petitioning firm, the invoice for the particular shipment in question showed percentage breakdowns for the items in question, giving the percentage of the value attributable to the text and to the binding. The witness failed to notice that the percentages for text and bindings of the items in question had actually been transposed, so that the figure given for the text was actually that of the binding, and that given for the binding was the figure for the text. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 51973.

#### Mason Bros. & Tarlin et al. *v.*United States,

protests 79917-K, etc. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
----

----

I Informācija

Komisija

----

KOPĒJAIS LAUKSAIMNIECĪBAS AUGU ŠĶIRŅU KATALOGS

24. pilnā izdevuma 5. papildinājums

(2006/C 193 A/01)

SATURS

Paskaidrojumi

Lauksaimniecības augu sugu saraksts

I.   Bietes

II.   Lopbarības augi

III.   Eļļas augi un šķiedraugi

IV.   Labības

V.   Kartupeļi

----

PASKAIDROJUMI

----

(1)OV C 68 A, 21.3.2006., 1. lpp. Katalogā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar 4. papildinājumu (OV C 167 A, 19.7.2006., 1. lpp.).

(2)OV L 193, 20.7.2002., 1. lpp. Direktīvā jaunākie grozījumi izdarīti ar Eiropas Parlamenta un Padomes Regulu (EK) Nr. 1829/2003 (OV L 268, 18.10.2003., 1. lpp.).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

2.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

13.FESTUCA ARUNDINACEA SCHREBER

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

30.LOTUS CORNICULATUS L.

31.LUPINUS ALBUS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

39.TRIFOLIUM ALEXANDRINUM L.

40.TRIFOLIUM HYBRIDUM L.

41.TRIFOLIUM INCARNATUM L.

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

48.VICIA SATIVA L.

49.VICIA VILLOSA ROTH.

51.BRASSICA OLERACEA L. CONVAR. ACEPHALA (DC.) ALEF. VAR. MEDULLOSA THELL. + VAR. VIRIDIS L.

III

55.BRASSICA RAPA L. VAR. SILVESTRIS (LAM.) BRIGGS

56.BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERNJ ET COSSON

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

62.GOSSYPIUM SPP.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

65.PAPAVER SOMNIFERUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

70.ORYZA SATIVA L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

73.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH

74.SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

75.SORGHUM BICOLOR (L.) MOENCH × SORGHUM SUDANENSE (PIPER) STAPF.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
<PAGE>
Exhibit 99.01



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


           In connection with the Quarterly Report of Click2learn, Inc., on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I, Kevin M. Oakes,
Chief Executive Officer of Click2learn, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

           (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and

           (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Click2learn, Inc.


Dated: August 14, 2002




/s/ Kevin M. Oakes
-------------------------------------
Kevin M. Oakes
Chief Executive Officer
No. 56381.

protest 586837-G (New York).

#### O. Yoshizawa *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats known as harvest hats, valued at less than $3 per dozen, similar in all material respects to those involved in *Caradine Hat Co.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). Accepting this stipulation as a statement of fact, the hats imported or withdrawn from warehouse prior to the effective date of T. D. 48075 were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5),.and those items imported or withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to that date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph.
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-11 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 3

BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 60 Att. 10

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-11 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-06020-PBT Document 60-11 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 4049 

To appropriate more funds for the Federal Communication Commission’s 

‘‘rip and replace’’ program, to require a spectrum auction, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 21, 2024 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. WICKER, and Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To appropriate more funds for the Federal Communication 

Commission’s ‘‘rip and replace’’ program, to require a 

spectrum auction, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting National 

5 Security with Spectrum Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL ‘‘RIP AND REPLACE’’ FUNDING. 

7 Section 4(k) of the Secure and Trusted Communica8 tions Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1603(k)) is 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 4049 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘$1,900,000,000’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘$4,980,000,000’’. 

3 SEC. 3. APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS. 

4 There is appropriated to the Federal Communica5 tions Commission for fiscal year 2024, out of amounts in 

6 the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $3,080,000,000, 

7 to remain available until expended, to carry out section 

8 4 of the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks 

9 Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1603). 

10 SEC. 4. FCC AUCTION 97 REAUCTION OF CERTAIN LI11 CENSES; COMPLETION OF REAUCTION. 

12 (a) FCC AUCTION 97 REAUCTION OF CERTAIN LI13 CENSES.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enact14 ment of this Act, the Federal Communications Commis15 sion shall initiate a system of competitive bidding under 

16 section 309(j) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 

17 U.S.C. 309(j)) to grant licenses for spectrum in the inven18 tory of the Commission within the bands of frequencies 

19 referred to by the Commission as the ‘‘AWS–3 bands’’, 

20 without regard to whether the authority of the Commis21 sion under paragraph (11) of that section has expired. 

22 (b) COMPLETION OF REAUCTION.—The Federal 

23 Communications Commission shall complete the system of 

24 competitive bidding described in subsection (a), including 

25 receiving payments, processing applications, and granting 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 4049 IS

1 licenses, without regard to whether the authority of the 

2 Commission under paragraph (11) of section 309(j) of the 

3 Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 309(j)) has ex4 pired. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Part 1 Fiscal Year 2023 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section III

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Account Transaction Categories

TRANSACTION

CODE TRANSACTION DESCRIPTION

Bulletin No. 2023-02 III AC - 1 December 2022

A. Funding

100 - 399 Budgetary Resources Other Than Collections

400 - 699 Authority Transfers

700 - 799 Reimbursables and Other Income

B. Disbursements and Payables

100 - 299 Payments/Purchases

300 - 399 Commitments/Undelivered Orders/Expended Authority - Unpaid

400 - 599 Payables/Accrued Liabilities

600 - 699 Advances and Prepayments

C. Collections and Receivables

100 - 399 Receipts

400 - 599 Receivables/Accrued Revenue

600 - 799 Asset Sale and Disposition (Gains and Losses)

D. Adjustments/Write-offs/Reclassification

100 - 299 Upward and Downward Adjustments

300 - 399 Prior-Period Adjustments

400 - 499 Write-offs

500 - 799 Reclassification/Revaluation

E. Accruals/Nonbudgetary Transfers Other Than Disbursements and Collections

100 - 399 Accrual, Depreciation, Amortization, and Depletion

400 - 499 Accumulated and Allocated Costs Not in Categories Above

500 - 799 Transfers Without Budgetary Impact

F. Yearend

100 - 299 Preclosing Entries

300 - 499 Closing Entries

G. Memorandum Entries

100 - 299 All Memorandum Entries (Excluding Closing Memorandum Entries)

H. Other Specialized Transaction Entries

100 - 799 Other
----

RESERVE LIST

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/9/05

ASSISTANTS (AST 3)

IN THE FIELD OF PROOFREADING

(Irish language)

(2006/C 252 A/03)

----
List of Subsidiaries
                                       Of
                      Furniture Brands International, Inc.

                                                               Jurisdiction of
   Name of Subsidiary                                           Incorporation
   ------------------                                           ---------------

Action Transport, Inc.                                           Delaware
Action Industries, Inc.                                          Mississippi
Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc.                              North Carolina
Broyhill Transport, Inc.                                         North Carolina
Fayette Enterprises, Inc.                                        Mississippi
Classic Design Furnishings, Inc.                                 Virginia
Lane Furniture Industries, Inc.                                  Delaware
The Lane Company, Incorporated                                   Virginia
Thomasville Furniture Industries, Inc.                           Delaware
Thomasville Furniture Latin America, S.A.                        Panama
Thomasville Home Furnishings, Inc.                               Delaware
Laneventure, Inc.                                                Delaware
Furniture Brands Export Co., Ltd.                                Barbados