alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

) 05-cr-00615

v. )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

KEVIN RANKIN ) 09-cv-3428

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

v. ) 07-cr-00020-2

)

KEVIN RANKIN ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

) 09-cv-3428

ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day of June 2011, upon review and consideration of pro se

Petitioner Kevin Rankin’s Motions to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 2255 [05-cr-615, Doc. No. 119; 07-cr-20-2, Doc. No. 153], and the Government’s

Motion to Dismiss Both Petitions [05-cr-615, Doc. No. 125], it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s Motions in each of the above-captioned cases are DENIED; 

2. The Government’s Motion in each of the above-captioned cases is GRANTED;

3. The Court finds no grounds upon which to issue a certificate of appealability, as

Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right; and 1

4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE these cases. 

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe 

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

 See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 1
###    

     & X V K L Q J
 2 . : 7 , 6 S R W 3 U L F H ) 2 % ' R O O D U V S H U % D U U H O

K W W S    Z Z Z

 H L D

 J R

Y  G Q D Y  S H W  K L V W  / H D I + D Q G O H U

 D V K [ " Q S H W V U Z W F I D    

# 3 ( 7 5 2 / ( 8 0 2 7 + ( 5 / , 4 8 , ' 6

2 9 ( 5 9 , ( : $ 1 $ / < 6 , 6 3 5 2 - ( & 7 , 2 1 6 * / 2 6 6 $ 5 < 3⁄4 ) $ 4 6 3⁄4



### ' $ 7 $

5 H I H U U L Q J 3 D J H V  6 S R W 3 U L F H V I R U & U X G H 2 L O D Q G 3 H W U R O H X P 3 U R G X F W V

9 L H Z + L V W R U \  ' D L O \ : H H N O \ 0 R Q W K O \ $ Q Q X D O ' R Z Q O R D G ' D W D ; / 6 ) L O H

7 K L V V H U L H V L V D Y D L O D E O H W K U R X J K W K H ( , $ R S H Q G D W D $ 3 , D Q G F D Q E H G R Z Q O R D G H G W R ( [ F H O R U H P E H G G H G D V D Q L Q W H U D F W L Y H F K D U W R U P D S R Q \ R X U Z H E V L W H





### & X V K L Q J  2 . : 7 , 6 S R W 3 U L F H ) 2 % ' R O O D U V S H U % D U U H O

' H F D G H < H D U   < H D U   < H D U   < H D U   < H D U   < H D U   < H D U   < H D U   < H D U   < H D U  
    V  

    

    

    

  

    V  

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

  

    V  

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

    

  

    V  

    

    

    

    

    

  

 1 R ' D W D 5 H S R U W H G 

  1 R W $ S S O L F D E O H  1 $ 1 R W $ Y D L O D E O H  : : L W K K H O G W R D Y R L G G L V F O R V X U H R I L Q G L Y L G X D O F R P S D Q \ G D W D


5 H O H D V H ' D W H           1 H [ W 5 H O H D V H ' D W H         

5 H I H U U L Q J 3 D J H V  6 S R W 3 U L F H V I R U & U X G H 2 L O D Q G 3 H W U R O H X P 3 U R G X F W V ' 2 : 1 / 2 $ '

' R O O D U V S H U % D U U H O 

## & X V K L Q J  2 . : 7 , 6 S R W 3 U L F H ) 2 %

& X V K L Q J
 2 . : 7 , 6 S R W 3 U L F H ) 2 %                                                                         

' D W D 6 R X U F H  7 K R P V R Q 5 H X W H U V
# sec5_custodialact_2018

&L&"Arial"&10&BBulletin No. 2018-05	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SCA - &P	&R&"Arial"&10&BJune 2018
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the

attached communication shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

 

_______________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 18 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Fernando AGUILAR-CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 00-50448.

D.C. No. CR-99-03639-JTM.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

*610Submitted June 8, 2001.*

Decided June 27, 2001.

Before KOZINSKI and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and WHYTE, District Judge.**

*

 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

**

The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM ***

Because the certified DMV records “fortifie[d], augment[ed], or supported]” Aguilar-Chavez’s post-arrest admission that he was not the owner of the truck, the *corpus delicti*rule was satisfied. *See United States v. Corona-Garcia,*210 F.3d 973, 979 (9th Cir.2000).

Aguilar-Chavez’s post-arrest admission that he was not the owner of the truck, coupled with the DMV records, was sufficient to support the jury’s determination that Aguilar-Chavez’s earlier statement to Agent Nielsen-that he was the owner of the truck-was false. *See United States v. Lopez-Alvarez,*970 F.2d 583, 589 (9th Cir.1992).

AFFIRMED.

***

 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case 2:05-cv-02527-BMS   Document 1   Filed 05/26/05   Page 1 of 4

Case 2:05-cv-02527-BMS   Document 1   Filed 05/26/05   Page 2 of 4

Case 2:05-cv-02527-BMS   Document 1   Filed 05/26/05   Page 3 of 4

Case 2:05-cv-02527-BMS   Document 1   Filed 05/26/05   Page 4 of 4
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Anticipated

Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/ End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Year

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Nonfed

Trading 

Prtnr

Trading 

Partner 

Main

PY

Adj DEFC

Pgm 

Rpt 

Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type BOC Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account 

Code

TAS 

Status

134900 Interest Receivable on Uninvested Funds N P D B/E D/C D/E A/S F ### #### CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E

403500 Anticipated Adjustments to Unobligated Balances of Indefinite 

Contract Authority Withdrawn

Y B C E C M X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D ER/ET U N U

422300 Uncollected Subsidy from Program Account N B D B/E D/C M 1001/1992-

2024

F B/P/X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D EP/ER E/F/U D/G U

439401 Daily Inflation/Deflation Compensation Adjustment - 

Unavailable

N B C B/E D/C P/S D/M P/X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D EP/ES/ET E/F/U N U

U S S G L A C C O U N T USSGL ATTRIBUTES B U L K F I L E A T T R I B U T E S T A S A T T R I B U T E S

Fiscal Year 2023 Repo

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Attribute Table

Secti 

Bulletin No. 2023-02 Draft IRC Handout
Trans. 

Code

X/K/N

N

N

N

 

 orting

ion IV

Bulletin No. 2023-02 Draft IRC Handout
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2024 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2024-03	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 2/15/24
# Bulletin No. 2019-14

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-14	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts 07 11 19

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-14	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT&P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts  07 11 19
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

501 I Street, Suite 10-100

Sacramento, CA 95814

Telephone: (916) 554-2789

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

 

VICENTE OCADIO,

 

 Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CR-S-04-0389-MCE

STIPULATION AND ORDER 

WITHDRAWING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

FOR RELEASE PENDING TRIAL

Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

Plaintiff United States of America, by its counsel Assistant

United States Attorney Phillip A. Talbert, and defendant Vicente

Ocadio, by and through his counsel David G. Currie, hereby

stipulate and agree that defendant’s Motion for Release Pending

Trial, which is currently scheduled for a hearing on December 13,

2005, at 8:30 a.m., shall be withdrawn, without prejudice to

refiling consistent with any motions schedule later set by the 

///

///

///

Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 166 Filed 12/15/05 Page 1 of 2
1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

Court in this matter, based on continuing discussions between

counsel concerning the motion.

Date: December 9, 2005 McGREGOR W. SCOTT

United States Attorney

By: /s/ Phillip A. Talbert 

PHILLIP A. TALBERT

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Date: December 9, 2005 By: /s/ David G. Currie 

 DAVID G. CURRIE, Attorney for 

 defendant VICENTE OCADIO

(Signed by PAT per telephone

authorization)

O R D E R

FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Date: December 14, 2005

_____________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:04-cr-00389-MCE Document 166 Filed 12/15/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Employment and Training Administration 

          - [TA-W-60,862] 

Pursuant to Section 221 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, an investigation was initiated on January 31, 2007 in response to a petition filed by a company official on behalf of workers at Springs Global, Hartwell Weaving and Yarn, Hartwell, Georgia. 

The petitioner has requested that the petition be withdrawn. Consequently, the investigation has been terminated. 

Signed in Washington, DC, this 13th day of February 2007. 

Linda G. Poole, 

Certifying Officer, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance. 

 [FR Doc. E7-3273 Filed 2-26-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
No. 63042.

#### Henry Pollak, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/14514, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of straw hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Pollak Industrial Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 251, C.D. 1991), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 63623.

protests 957320-G, etc. (Boston).

#### Brockton Wholesale Bev. *Co.*et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richakdson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 51645.

#### Protests 987692-G, etc., of North American Mercantile Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nippon Co.*(32 C. C. P. A. 164, C. A. D. 303). In accordance therewith certain items of the merchandise were held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1705 as kelp, and other items were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1540 as seaweeds, manufactured.
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of International Diary Queen, Inc. of our report dated January 11, 1996,
included in the 1995 Annual Report to Shareholders of International Dairy
Queen, Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of International Dairy
Queen, Inc. listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audits. In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Nos. 33-40784, 33-52781 and 33-58615) on Form S-8 of our report dated January
11, 1996, with respect to the consolidated financial statements incorporated
herein by reference, and our report included in the preceding paragraph with
respect to the financial statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of International Dairy Queen, Inc.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Minneapolis, Minnesota
February 14, 1996
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




I, Andrew Stewart, the President, Chief Executive Officer and principal executive officer of Man Investments (USA) Corp., the general partner of Man-AHL Diversified I L.P. (the “Partnership”), certify that (i) the Quarterly Report of the Partnership on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.




Date: May 17, 2010                                                                                         /s/ Andrew Stewart


Andrew Stewart


President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We have issued our report dated October 30, 1997, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report of Innovex, Inc. on Form 10-K
for the year ended September 30, 1997. We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of said report in the Registration Statements of Innovex, Inc. on
Forms S-8 (File No. 33-14776, effective June 3, 1987, File No. 33-27530,
effective March 17, 1989, File No. 33-59035, effective May 2, 1995, File No.
333-10045, effective August 12, 1996 and File No. 333-10047, effective August
12, 1996.)


                                               \s\ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
December 12, 1997
No. 61812.

#### Wood, Niebuhr & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 310132-K (New York).

*517Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 6 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 49131.

#### Protests 16236-K, etc., of Saks & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Bullocks*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 110, C. D. 441) certain of the items in question were held not subject to countervailing duty.
Case No. 13,184.

#### SMYTHE v. BANKS.

[4 Dall. 329.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Pennsylvania.

April, 1797.

Witness — Privilege i-rom Arrest.

Capias. The defendant was a resident of Virginia, and had been subpoenaed as a witness in the case of Symes’s Lessee v. Irwine [Case No. 13,714], which was marked for trial at the present term, but was continued on the 20th of April. He was arrested on the 26th of April; and the following day, Levy moved, that he should be discharged from the arrest and process, on account of the privilege of a witness, eundo, morando, et redeundo. 4 Com. Dig. 475 ; 2 Strange, 1094, 986; Yin. Abr. tit. “Privilege.”

BY

THE COURT.

The witness is, undoubtedly, privileged from arrest, for a reasonable time, to prepare for his departure, and return to his home, as well as during his actual attendance upon the court. But the privilege does not extend throughout the term, at' which the cause is marked for trial; nor will it protect him while the witness is engaged in transacting his general private business, after he is discharged from the obligation of the subpoena.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas W. Perry, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Merrill Lynch
& Co., Inc., the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ THOMAS W. PERRY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Thomas W. Perry *
                              Title:   Chief Accounting Officer and Controller,
                                       Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: November 13, 2009
------------------------

*  Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
October 14, 2010

A&C-10-403 Page 1 of 1

Sandy R. Liu

Federal Aviation Administration Office of Environment and Energy, (AEE-100) Noise D ivision 800 Independence Ave, SW Washington, DC 20591

Subject: Gulfstream Application – Authorization to Exceed Mach 1 (§ 91.817)

Dear Mr. Liu:

Gulfstream requests FAA consideration to allow cert ain Flight Tests aspects associated with the company’s proposed maximum Design Dive Mach number (Md) of 0.99M to exceed Mach 1.

This FAA authorization is conducive to 14 CFR Part 91, Appendix B – Authorization to Exceed Mach 1 (§ 91.817).

Gulfstream proposes to conduct a series of actual t est at or above Mach 1 to coincide with an analytical analysis in an effort to determine aircr aft characteristics as the aircraft approaches the maximum Design Dive Mach number speed.

If there are any questions, or if I can be of furth er assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (912) 965-5270 or GAC.Cert@Gulfstream.com

.

Sincerely,

Anthony Beck, Manager

Airworthiness & Certification
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 83 Att. 9

Dockets.Justia.com
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3996 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3996

        To enhance the work of the North Pacific Research Board.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 20, 2024

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To enhance the work of the North Pacific Research Board.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``North Pacific Research Board 
Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. NORTH PACIFIC RESEARCH BOARD ENHANCEMENT.

    Section 401(e) of Public Law 105-83 (111 Stat. 1608; 43 U.S.C. 
1474d) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (L), by striking ``and'' after 
                the semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (M), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting a semicolon;
                    (C) in subparagraph (N), by striking the period at 
                the end and inserting ``; and'';
                    (D) by inserting after subparagraph (N) the 
                following:
            ``(O) one member who shall represent Alaska Natives and 
        possesses personal knowledge of, and direct experience with, 
        subsistence uses and shall be nominated by the Board and 
        appointed by the Secretary.''; and
                    (E) by adding at the end the following: ``Board 
                members appointed under subparagraphs (N) and (O) shall 
                serve for 3-year terms, and may be reappointed once.''; 
                and
            (2) in paragraph (4)(B), by striking ``Not more than 15 
        percent of the funds provided to the Secretary of Commerce 
        under paragraph (1) may be used to provide support for the 
        Board and administer grants under this subsection.'' and 
        inserting ``The funds provided to the Secretary of Commerce 
        under paragraph (1) may be used to provide support for the 
        Board and administer grants under this subsection. The Board 
        shall maximize the percentage of funds directed to research and 
        maintain the highest quality standards in administering grants 
        under this subsection. On the date that is 5 years after the 
        date of enactment of the North Pacific Research Board 
        Enhancement Act, not more than 15 percent of the funds provided 
        to the Secretary of Commerce under paragraph (1) may be used to 
        provide support for the Board and administer grants under this 
        subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
No. 58945.

protests 192957-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Wright Bros. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that case, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content T. D. 53159” in schedule “A,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.